falsefalse800--12-31--12-31trueFYFY201920192019-12-31false10-K2325 E. Camelback Road, 9th FloorPhoenix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ver:RallysMember ver:HamtramckMIMember 2019-12-31 0001507385 ver:PizzaHutWingStreetMember ver:BatesburgSCMember 2019-12-31 0001507385 ver:PetSmartMember ver:SouthlakeTXMember 2019-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019
 OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file numbers: 001-35263 and 333-197780

VEREIT, Inc.
VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (VEREIT,(VEREIT, Inc.) 45-2482685
Delaware (VEREIT(VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.) 45-1255683
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100, 9th FloorPhoenixAZ 85016
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(800)606-3610
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
Title of each class:Trading symbol(s):Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock $0.01$0.01 par value per share (VEREIT, Inc.)VERNew York Stock Exchange
6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock $0.01$0.01 par value per share (VEREIT, Inc.)VER PRFNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Act of 1934: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
VEREIT, Inc. Yesx No oVEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yesx No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
VEREIT, Inc. Yes o Nox VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes o Nox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. VEREIT, Inc. Yesx No oVEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yesx No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). VEREIT, Inc. Yesx No oVEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yesx No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
VEREIT, Inc.Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filero 
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o
        
 Smaller reporting companyo Emerging growth companyo  
VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.Large accelerated filero Accelerated filero 
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
x
        
 Smaller reporting companyo Emerging growth companyo  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. VEREIT, Inc. ¨ VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
VEREIT, Inc. Yes o No x VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of VEREIT, Inc. as of June 30, 201728, 2019 was approximately $7.9$8.8 billion based on the closing sale price for VEREIT, Inc.’s common stock on that day as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. Such value excludes common stock held by executive officers and directors.

There were 974,297,9221,077,331,084 shares of common stock of VEREIT, Inc. outstanding as of February 20, 2018.21, 2020.
There is no public trading market for the common units of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. As a result, the aggregate market value of the common units held by non-affiliates of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. cannot be determined.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of VEREIT, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than those portions of the Proxy Statement specifically incorporated by reference pursuant to Items 10 through 14 of Part III hereof, no other portions of the Proxy Statement shall be deemed so incorporated.





EXPLANATORY NOTE


This report combines the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172019 of VEREIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, of which VEREIT, Inc. is the sole general partner. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “VEREIT,” the “Company” or the “General Partner” mean VEREIT, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., and all references to the “Operating Partnership” or “OP” mean VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
As the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., VEREIT, Inc. has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management and control.
We believe combining the Annual Reports on Form 10-K of VEREIT, Inc. and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. into this single report results in the following benefits:
enhancing investors’ understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminating duplicative disclosure and providing a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and
creating time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
There are a few differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important to understand the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how we operate as an interrelated consolidated company. VEREIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust whose only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. As a result, VEREIT, Inc. does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing equity or debt from time to time and guaranteeing certain unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company and holds the ownership interests in the Company’s joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity or debt issuances by VEREIT, Inc., which are generally contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units. To help investors understand the significant differences between VEREIT, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, there are separate sections in this report that separately discuss VEREIT, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, including the consolidated financial statements and certain notes to the consolidated financial statements as well as separate disclosures in Item 4.9A. Controls and Procedures and Exhibit 31 and Exhibit 32 certifications. As sole general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, VEREIT, Inc. consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of VEREIT, Inc. and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. are the same on their respective consolidated financial statements. The separate discussions of VEREIT, Inc. and VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.





VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019



 Page



Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the federal securities laws, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) thatwhich reflect our expectations and projections about ourregarding future events and plans, future financial condition, results performance, prospectsof operations and opportunities. We have attempted to identify these forward-looking statements bybusiness. Generally, the use of words such as“anticipates,” “assumes,” “believes,” “continues,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “goals,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “targets,” “will,” “seek,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “targets,” “intends,” “should,” “estimates,” “could,” “continue,” “assume,” “projects,” “plans” orvariations of such words and similar expressions.expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are subject toinvolve a number of known and unknown assumptions and risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be difficult to predict and beyond the Company’s control, that maycould cause actual events and plans or could cause our actualbusiness, financial condition, liquidity and results performance or achievementsof operations to bediffer materially different from any future results, performance or achievementsthose expressed or implied by thesein the forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, those discussed below. We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable by law.applicable. We do not undertakedisclaim any obligation to publicly to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required to satisfy our obligations under federal securitiesby law.
The following are some, but not all, of the assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all.
We are subject to risks associated with tenant, geographic and industry concentrations with respect to our properties.
Our properties goodwill and intangible assets and other assets may be subject to impairment charges.
We could be subject to unexpected costs or unexpected liabilities that may arise from potential dispositions.dispositions, including related to limited partnership, tenant-in-common and Delaware statutory trust real estate programs (“1031 real estate programs”) and VEREIT’s management with respect to such programs.
We are subject to competition in the acquisition and disposition of properties and in the leasing of our properties and we may be unable to acquire, dispose of, or lease properties on advantageous terms.
We could be subject to risks associated with bankruptcies or insolvencies of tenants, or from tenant defaults generally.
We are subject to risks associated with pending government investigations relating togenerally or from the findingsunpredictability of the investigation conducted in 2014 by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”)business plans and financial condition of the General Partner’s board of directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”) and related litigation, including the expense of such investigations and litigation and any potential payments upon resolution.our tenants.
We have substantial indebtedness, which may affect our ability to pay dividends, and expose us to interest rate fluctuation risk and the risk of default under our debt obligations.
We may be subject to increases in our borrowing costs as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors, including the potential phasing out of London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”) after 2021.
Our overall borrowing and operating flexibility may be adversely affected by the terms and restrictions within the indenture governing the Senior Notes (as defined in Note 10 –Debtsenior unsecured notes (the “Senior Notes”), and the Credit Agreement governing the terms of the Credit Facility (as both terms are defined in Note 10 –Debt)Item 1. Business).
Our access to capital and terms of future financings may be affected by adverse changes to our credit rating.
We may be affected by the incurrence of additional secured or unsecured debt.
We may not be able to achieve and maintain profitability.
We may not generate cash flows sufficient to pay our dividends to stockholders or meet our debt service obligations.
We may be affected by risks resulting from losses in excess of insured limits.
We may fail to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We are subject to risks associated with our joint ventures including their management.
Compliance with the REIT annual distribution requirements may limit our operating flexibility.
We may be unable to retain or hire key personnel.
All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors within ourthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

We use certain defined terms throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have the following meanings:
When we refer to “annualized rental income,” we mean the rental revenue under our leases on operating properties owned at the respective reporting date on a straight-line basis, which includes the effect of rent escalations and any tenant concessions, such as free rent, and our pro rata share of such revenues from properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures. Annualized rental income excludes any bad debt allowances and anyadjustments to rental income due to changes in the collectability assessment, contingent rent, such as percentage rent.rent, and operating expense reimbursements. Management uses annualized rental income as a basis for tenant, industry and geographic concentrations and other metrics within the portfolio. Annualized rental income is not indicative of future performance.
When we refer to a “creditworthy tenant,” we mean a tenant that has entered into a lease that we determine is creditworthy and may include tenants with an investment grade or below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating

agencies, or unrated tenants. To the extent we determine that a tenant is a “creditworthy tenant” even though it does not have an investment grade credit rating, we do so based on our management’s determination that a tenant should have the financial wherewithal to honor its obligations under its lease with us. As explained further below, this determination is based on our management’s substantial experience performing credit analysis and is made after evaluating all of a tenant’s due diligence materials that are made available to us, including financial statements and operating data.
When we refer to a “direct financing lease,” we mean a lease that requires specific treatment due to the significance of the lease payments from the inception of the lease compared to the fair value of the property, term of the lease, a transfer of ownership, or a bargain purchase option. These leases are recorded as a net asset on the balance sheet. The amount recorded is calculated as the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term.
When we refer to properties that are net leased on a “long term basis,” we mean properties with remaining primary lease terms of generally seven to 10 years or longer on average, depending on property type.
Under a “net lease,” the tenant occupying the leased property (usually as a single tenant) does so in much the same manner as if the tenant were the owner of the property. There are various forms of net leases, most typically classified as triple net or double net. Triple net leases typically require that the tenant pay all expenses associated with the property (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs). Double net leases typically require that the tenant pay all operating expenses associated with the property (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance), but excludes some or all major repairs (e.g., roof, structure and parking lot). Accordingly, the owner receives the rent “net” of these expenses, rendering the cash flow associated with the lease predictable for the term of the lease. Under a net lease, the tenant generally agrees to lease the property for a significant term and agrees that it will either have no ability or only limited ability to terminate the lease or abate rent prior to the expiration of the term of the lease as a result of real estate driven events such as casualty, condemnation or failure by the landlord to fulfill its obligations under the lease.
When we refer to “operating properties” we mean properties owned and consolidated by the Company, and beginning in 2017, omitting properties (the “Excluded Properties”) for which (i) the related mortgage loan is in default, and (ii) management decides to transfer the properties to the lender in connection with settling the mortgage note obligation. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no Excluded Properties. During the year ended December 31, 2019, there was one Excluded Property, which was an office property comprised of 145,186 square feet, of which 6,926 square feet were vacant, with principal outstanding of $19.5 million on the related mortgage loan. During the year ended December 31, 2018, there was one Excluded Property, which was a vacant industrial property, comprised of 307,725 square feet with principal outstanding of $16.2 million on the related mortgage loan. During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were seven Excluded Properties, which were two vacant office properties and five industrial properties, two of which were vacant, comprised of an aggregate 2.1 million square feet with aggregate principal outstanding of $116.6 million on the related mortgage loans.
Effective April 1, 2019, the Company determined that the real estate portfolio and economic metrics of operating properties should include the Company's pro rata share of square feet and annualized rental income from the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures, based upon the Company's legal ownership percentage, which may, at times, not equal the Company's economic interest because of various provisions in certain joint venture agreements regarding distributions of cash flow based on capital account balances, allocations of profits and losses and payments of preferred returns. The Company did not update data presented for prior periods as the impact on prior period metrics was immaterial.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, our portfolio was comprised of 4,0923,858 retail, restaurant, office and industrial real estate properties with an aggregate of 94.788.5 million square feet, of which 98.5%99.0% was leased, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.58.3 years. As of December 31, 2017, one vacant industrial property (the “Excluded Property”), comprised of 307,275Omitting the square feet which secured a mortgage note payable with debt outstanding of $16.2 million, was not considered an operating property. Omittingone redevelopment property and including the Excluded Property,pro rata share of square feet and annualized rental income from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures, we owned 4,091 operating properties withhad an aggregate of 94.489.5 million square feet, of which 98.8%99.1% was leased, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.58.3 years as of December 31, 2017.2019.





PART I
Item 1. Business.Business.
Overview
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. TheOmitting the square feet of one redevelopment property and including the pro rata share of square feet and annualized rental income from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures, the Company has 4,0913,858 retail, restaurant, office and industrial operating properties with an aggregate of 94.489.5 million square feet, of which 98.8%99.1% was leased as of December 31, 2017,2019, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.58.3 years. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties.
Substantially all of our real estate operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership. VEREIT, Inc. is the sole general partner and holder of 97.6%99.9% of the common partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (the “OP Units”) as of December 31, 2017 with the remaining 2.4% of the OP Units owned by certain non-affiliated investors and certain former directors, officers and employees of the Former Manager (defined below).2019.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. On November 13, 2017,The Company completed the Company entered into a purchasesale of Cole Capital on February 1, 2018. The assets, liabilities and sale agreement to sellrelated financial results of substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all ofsegment are reflected in the Cole Capital segment is presentedfinancial statements as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented. The Company's continuing operations represent primarily those of the real estate investment segment. See Note 5 —Discontinued Operations, for further information on the sale of Cole Capital.operations.
VEREIT, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Maryland on December 2, 2010 and has elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Operating Partnership was formed in the State of Delaware on January 13, 2011. We operate our business in a manner that permits us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).amended. VEREIT, Inc.’s shares of common stock (“Common Stock”) and 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the trading symbols “VER” and “VERVER PRF,” respectively.
20172019 Developments
Real Estate Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company acquired controlling financial interests in 8866 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million.$403.6 million, which includes $2.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized.
Real Estate Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company disposed of 137201 properties, forincluding the sale of six consolidated properties to two newly-formed joint ventures in which the Company owns a 20% equity interest (the “Industrial Partnership”) and one property sold through a foreclosure as discussed in Note 6 –Debt, for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9 million,$1.2 billion, of which the Company’sour share was $574.4 million$1.1 billion after the profit participation payments related to the disposition of 3136 Red Lobster properties and the consolidated joint venture partner’s share of the sales price, resultingproperties. The dispositions resulted in consolidated proceeds of $445.5 million$1.1 billion after closing costs and a $66.0 million debt assumption.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
2017 Bond Offering
On August 11, 2017,contributions to the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 3.950% Senior Notes due 2027, (the “2017 Bond Offering”). As discussed in Note 10 –Debt, the Company subsequently used the proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering to repay borrowings, including swap termination costs and accrued and unpaid interest under its $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan.Industrial Partnership. The Company usedrecorded a gain of $293.9 million related to the remaining proceeds to pay down secured debt.dispositions which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Share Repurchase ProgramLitigation Activity
On May 12, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock over the subsequent 12 months, as market conditions warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company also entered into agreements to settle certain outstanding litigation, including the pending class action lawsuit. In accordance with the terms of the agreements, certain defendants agreed to pay in the aggregate $1.025 billion, comprised of contributions from principals of the Company's former external manager, ARC Properties Advisors, LLC, (the “Former Manager”) totaling $225.0 million, $12.5 million from the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer (the “Former CFO”), $49.0 million from the Company’s former auditor, and the balance of $738.5 million from the Company. The contribution from the Company’s Former Manager and Former CFO were subsequently satisfied with a combination of (i) Limited Partner OP Units held by the Former Manager and the Former CFO, (ii) amounts due related to dividends on certain of

such Limited Partner OP Units previously withheld from distribution, (iii) the value of substantially all of the Limited Partner OP Units and dividends surrendered to the Company in July 2019 as a result of a settlement by the Former Manager with the SEC, and (iv) cash paid by the Former Manager and Former CFO. On October 15, 2019, the Company paid $966.3 million to fund its contribution and a portion of the Former Manager and Former CFO’s contributions in connection with their 19.9 million surrendered Limited Partner OP Units and dividends related to certain of such Limited Partner OP Units. The Company also reached an agreement on the material terms of a negotiated resolution relating to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) investigation pertaining to the findings of the investigation conducted in 2014 by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the General Partner’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”), among other things, as discussed in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
Credit Agreement
On May 23, 2018, the General Partner, as guarantor, and the OP, as borrower, entered into a credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and the other lenders party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provided for maximum borrowings of $2.9 billion, originally consisting of a $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $900.0 million unsecured term loan facility (the “Credit Facility Term Loan,” together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Facility”). In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, the OP repaid all of the outstanding obligations under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014 (as amended, the “2014 Credit Agreement”) and the 2014 Credit Agreement was terminated. Effective December 27, 2019, the Company reduced its Revolving Credit Facility capacity from $2.0 billion to $1.5 billion. At December 31, 2019, $150.0 million was outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and the full $900.0 million was drawn on the Credit Facility Term Loan.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million notional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, which were designated as cash flow hedges. Due to an improvement in the Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company also entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt.
Debt Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s total debt decreased by $382.2 million, from $6.1 billion to $5.7 billion, primarily due to the redemption of the 2019 Senior Notes of $750.0 million, the redemption of the 4.125% senior notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) of $400.0 million, the repurchase of $80.7 million of the 3.75% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2020 Convertible Notes”), net repayments on the Revolving Credit Facility of $103.0 million and a reduction of $388.1 million in secured debt, offset by the issuance of the 3.10% senior notes due 2029 (the “2029 Senior Notes”) of $600.0 million and borrowings on the Credit Facility Term Loan of $750.0 million.
Common Stock Offering
On September 26, 2019, the Company completed a public equity offering (the "Offering"), selling a total of 94.3 million shares of Common Stock, which included the full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares, for net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses, of $886.9 million. The Company contributed the net proceeds from the Offering to the OP in exchange for additional General Partner OP Units, which have substantially identical economic terms as the Company’s Common Stock. Subsequent to September 30, 2019, the net proceeds of the Offering were used to pay amounts owed in connection with the settlement of certain litigation, as described in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies, and for general corporate purposes.

Common Stock Continuous Offering Programs
On September 19, 2016, the Company registered a continuous equity offering program (the “Prior Program”) pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell, from time to time, in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions, shares of Common Stock with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $750.0 million, through its sales agents. As of and during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had issued 5.0 million shares under the Prior Program, at a weighted average price per share of $8.42, for gross proceeds of $42.5 million. The weighted average price per share, net of offering costs, was $8.30, for net proceeds of $41.8 million.
On April 15, 2019, the Company established a new continuous equity offering program pursuant to which the Company may sell shares of Common Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $750.0 million from time to time through April 15, 2022 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions (the “Current ATM Program”). The Current ATM Program replaced the Prior Program. The proceeds from any sale of shares under the Current ATM Program have been or will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding potential acquisitions and repurchasing or repaying outstanding indebtedness. As of and during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had issued 9.0 million shares under the Current ATM Program, at a weighted average price per share of $9.60, for gross proceeds of $86.7 million. The weighted average price per share, net of offering costs, was $9.46, for net proceeds of $85.4 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $663.3 million available to be sold under the Current ATM Program.
Share Repurchase Programs
On May 3, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors terminated its prior share repurchase program and authorized a new program (the “2018 Share Repurchase Program”) that permitted the Company to repurchase up to $200.0 million of its outstanding Common Stock through May 3, 2019, as market conditions warranted. On May 6, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the “2019 Share Repurchase Program”) that permits the Company to repurchase up to $200.0 million of its outstanding Common Stock through May 6, 2022. Under the share repurchase programs, repurchases can be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, structured or derivative transactions, including accelerated stock repurchase transactions, or other methods of acquiring shares in accordance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements. The share repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to make any repurchases at a specific time or in a specific situation, and repurchases are influenced by prevailing market conditions, the trading price of the Common Stock, the Company’s financial performance and other conditions. Shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company under the share repurchase programs, if any, will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.
There were no share repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program or the 2019 Share Repurchase Program during the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $200.0 million available for share repurchases under the 2019 Share Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 68,7590.8 million shares of Common Stock in multiple open market transactions, at a weighted average share price of $6.95 for $0.5an aggregate purchase price of $5.6 million as part ofunder the 2018 Share Repurchase Program.

Series F Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred OP Units
Debt Reductions
TheDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company decreasedredeemed a total debt by $293.8of 12.0 million from $6.4 billion to $6.1 billion, partially due to the repaymentshares of Series F Preferred Stock, representing approximately 28.02% of the Credit Facility Term Loan of $500.0 millionissued and a $579.9 million reduction of secured debt. These reductions of debt were partially offset by the issuance of $600.0 million of unsecured notes and net borrowings on the revolving credit facility of $185.0 million.
Cole Capital Sale
On November 13, 2017, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement (as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale agreement, datedoutstanding preferred shares as of February 1, 2018, the “Cole Capital Purchasebeginning of the year. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock were redeemed at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus all accrued and Sale Agreement”)unpaid dividends.
As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 30.9 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock, approximately 30.9 million corresponding General Partner Series F Preferred Units and 49,766 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding.
Termination of Services Agreement with the Cole Purchaser (as defined below)
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s obligation to provide certain initial transition services for CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC. UnderLLC, terminated in accordance with the terms of the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company agreed to sell to the Cole Purchaser all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. (“CCA”), our subsidiary that sponsors and manages non-listed real estate investment trusts, and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries. The sale closed (the “Cole Capital Closing Date”) on February 1, 2018 for total consideration of approximately $120 million paid in cash.

On the Cole Capital Closing Date, we entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with Cole Capital, pursuant to which we will continue. Under the Services Agreement, the Company had continued to provide certain initial transition services to the Cole Purchaser and the Cole REITs subsequent to the sale of Cole Capital on February 1, 2018. The Company recorded $10.5 million of restructuring expenses related to the reorganization of its business after the sale of Cole Capital and its subsidiaries andcessation of initial transition services performed pursuant to Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc. (“CCPT IV”), Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc. (“INAV”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”), and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V” and collectively with CCPT IV, INAV, CCIT II and CCIT III, the “Cole REITs”) including operational real estate support.Services Agreement. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, we willthe Company continues to be entitledobligated to receive reimbursement forprovide certain of theother services provided and fees based on the future revenues of Cole Capital above a specified dollar threshold (the “Net Revenue Payments”), upthrough December 31, 2023, which may be extended to an aggregate of $80 million in Net Revenue Payments.December 31, 2024 under certain circumstances.


Primary Investment Focus
We own and actively manage a diversified portfolio of single-tenant retail, restaurant, office and industrial real estate assets subject to long-term net leases with creditworthy tenants. Our focus is on single-tenant, net-leased properties that are strategically located and essential to the business operations of the tenant, as well as retail properties that offer necessity and value-oriented products or services. We actively manage the portfolio by considering several metrics including property type, tenant concentration, geography, credit and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity. We believe that actively managing our portfolio allows us to attain the best operating results for each asset and the overall portfolio through strategic planning, implementation of these plans and responding proactively to changes and challenges in the marketplace.
Investment Policies
When evaluating prospective investments in or dispositions of real property, our management considers relevant real estate and financial factors, including the location of the property, the leases and other agreements affecting the property and business operations of the tenant, the creditworthiness of major tenants, its income-producing capacity, its physical condition, its prospects for appreciation, its prospects for liquidity, tax considerations and other factors. In this regard, our management will have substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific investments, subject in certain instances to the approval of the Board of Directors.
As part of our overall portfolio strategy, we seek to lease space and/or acquire properties leased to creditworthy tenants that meet our underwriting and operating guidelines. Prior to entering into any transaction, our corporate credit analysis and underwriting professionals conduct a review of a tenant’s credit quality. In addition, we consistently monitor the credit quality of our portfolio by actively reviewing the creditworthiness of certain tenants, focusing primarily on those tenants representing the greatest concentration of our portfolio. This review primarily includes an analysis of the tenant’s financial statements either quarterly, or as frequently as the lease permits. We also consider tenant credit quality when assessing our portfolio for strategic dispositions. When we assess tenant credit quality, we, among other factors that we may deem relevant: (i) review relevant financial information, including financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity; (ii) evaluate the depth and experience of the tenant’s management team; and (iii) assess the strength/growth of the tenant’s industry. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts arising from estimated losses that could result from the tenant’s inability to make required current rent payments and an allowance against accrued rental incomerevenue for future potential losses that we deem to be unrecoverable over the term of the lease. The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We are of the opinion that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants and mitigation options.

Real Estate Investments
As of December 31, 2017, omitting the Excluded Property,2019, the Company owned 4,0913,858 operating properties comprising 94.489.5 million square feet of retail and commercial space located in 49 states and Puerto Rico, and Canada,of which includes properties owned through consolidated joint ventures. The rentable space at these properties99.1% was 98.8% leased with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years.8.3 years, which includes properties owned through consolidated joint ventures and the pro rata share of square feet and annualized rental income from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures and omits the square feet of one redevelopment property. There were no tenants exceeding 10% of our consolidated annualized rental income as of December 31, 2017, 20162019 or 2015.2018. As of December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015,2018, properties located in Texas represented 12.8%, 13.5% and 13.1%12.5%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. As of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, tenants in the casual dining restaurant and manufacturing industriesindustry accounted for 13.8%12.0%, and 10.1%12.8%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. As of December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018, tenants in the casual dining restaurant and manufacturing industriesindustry accounted for 15.6%9.3% and 10.1%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. As of December 31, 2015, tenants in the casual dining restaurant and manufacturing industries accounted for 16.6% and 10.1%, respectively, of our consolidated annualized rental income. 
Financing Policies
We rely on leverage to allow us to invest in a greater number of assets and enhance our asset returns. We expect our leverage metrics to improve over time.
We intend to finance future acquisitions with the most advantageous source of capital available to us at the time of the transaction, which may include a combination of public and private offerings of our equity and debt securities, secured and unsecured corporate-level debt, property-level debt and mortgage financing and other public, private or bank debt. In addition, we may acquire properties in exchange for the issuance of common stockCommon Stock or OP Units and we may acquire properties subject to existing mortgage indebtedness.

We also may obtain secured or unsecured debt to acquire properties, and we expect that our financing sources will include the public debt market, banks and institutional investment firms, including asset managers and life insurance companies. Although we intend to maintain a conservative capital structure, our charter does not contain a specific limitation on the amount of debt we may incur and the Board of Directors may implement or change target debt levels at any time without the approval of our stockholders.
We intend to continue to emphasize unsecured corporate-level or OP-level debt in our financing and to seek to reduce the percentage of our assets which are secured by mortgage loans. For information relating to our Credit Facility, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources.
Competition
We are subject to competition in the acquisition and disposition of properties and in the leasing of our properties. We compete with a number of developers, owners and operators of retail, restaurant, office and industrial real estate, many of which own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located. We also may face new competitors and, due to our focus on single-tenant properties located throughout the United States, and because many of our competitors are locally or regionally focused, we do not expect to encounter the same competitors in each region of the United States. Our competitors may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments and may succeed in buying the properties that we have targeted for acquisition. We may also incur costs in connection with unsuccessful acquisitions that we will not be able to recover. Foreign investors may view the U.S. real estate market as being more stable than other international markets and may increase investments in high-quality single-tenant properties, especially in gateway cities. We may also incur costs in connection with unsuccessful acquisitions that we will not be able to recover.
Regulations
Our investments are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws, ordinances and regulations, including, among other things, health, safety and zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all material permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments.
Our properties are also subject to laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), which require that all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Some of our properties may currently not be in compliance with the ADA. If one or more of the properties in our portfolio is not in compliance with the ADA or any other regulatory requirements, we may be required to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance.
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current owner of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up contaminated property. Under these laws, courts and government agencies have the authority to impose cleanup

responsibility and liability even if the owner did not know of and was not responsible for the contamination. For example, liability can be imposed upon us based on the activities of our tenants or a prior owner. In addition to the cost of the cleanup, environmental contamination on a property may adversely affect the value of the property and our ability to sell, rent or finance the property, and may adversely impact our investment in that property.
Prior to acquisition of a property, we will obtain Phase I environmental reports, or will rely on recent Phase I environmental reports. These reports will be prepared in accordance with an appropriate level of due diligence based on our standards and generally include a physical site inspection, a review of relevant federal, state and local environmental and health agency database records, one or more interviews with appropriate site-related personnel, review of the property’s chain of title and review of historic aerial photographs and other information on past uses of the property and nearby or adjoining properties. We may also obtain a Phase II investigation which may include limited subsurface investigations and tests for substances of concern where the results of the Phase I environmental reports or other information indicates possible contamination or where our consultants recommend such procedures.
Employees
As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had approximately 330160 employees. Following the closing of the Cole Capital sale, approximately 100 of these employees were employed by the Cole Purchaser.

Available Information
We electronically file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and proxy statements, with the SEC. You may read and copyaccess any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or you may access them through the EDGAR database at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from theour website maintained for us at www.ir.vereit.com. We are providing our website address solely for the information of investors. We do not intend for the information contained on our website to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or other filings with the SEC.
Supplemental U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

This summary is for general information purposes only and is not tax advice. This discussion does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to particular holders of our securities in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances.
Recent Legislation
The recently enacted “Tax Cutsfollowing discussion supplements and Jobs Act” (the “TCJA”), generally applicable for tax years beginningupdates the disclosures under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” in the prospectus dated April 15, 2019 contained in our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on April 15, 2019.

The sixth sentence of the discussion under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations - Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders - Distributions Attributable to Sale or Exchange of Real Property” is revised to read, “We must withhold 21% of any distribution that is a distribution attributable to USRPI gain,” such that the revised paragraph reads in full as follows:

Distributions Attributable to Sale or Exchange of Real Property. Except as discussed below with respect to 10% or less holders of regularly traded classes of stock, “qualified shareholders” and “qualified foreign pension funds” (for periods on and after December 31, 2017, made significant changes18, 2015), for any year in which we qualify as a REIT, a Non-U.S. Stockholder will incur tax on distributions by us that are attributable to the Internal Revenue Codegain from our sale or exchange of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), including a number ofUSRPIs under special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that affect the taxation of businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders.
Among other changes, the TCJA made the following changes:
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, (i) the U.S. federal income tax laws known as the Foreign Investment in Real Property Act, or FIRPTA. The term USRPIs includes interests in real property and shares in corporations at least 50% of whose real estate and business assets consist of interests in U.S. real property. Under those rules, a Non-U.S. Stockholder is taxed on distributions by us attributable to gain from sales of USRPIs as if the gain were effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Stockholder. A Non-U.S. Stockholder thus would be taxed on such a distribution at regular tax rates applicable to U.S. Stockholders, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax. A corporate Non-U.S. Stockholder not entitled to treaty relief or exemption also may be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on such a distribution. We must withhold 21% of any distribution that is a distribution attributable to USRPI gain. A Non-U.S. Stockholder may receive a credit against its tax liability for the amount we withhold. However, FIRPTA and the 21% withholding tax will not apply to any distribution with respect to any class of our stock that is regularly traded on an established securities market located in the United States if the recipient Non-U.S. Stockholder did not own more than 10% of such class of stock at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of distribution. Instead, any distribution will be treated as an ordinary distribution subject to the rules discussed above.

The second sentence of the discussion under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations - Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders - U.S. Federal Income Tax Withholding on Distributions not Subject to FIRPTA” is revised to read, “We also may be require to withhold tax at the rate of 21% on the portion of any dividend to a Non-U.S. Stockholder that is or could be designated by us as a capital gain dividend, even if not attributable to gain on a sale or exchange of an interest in U.S. real property,” such that the revised paragraph reads in full as follows:

U.S. Federal Income Tax Withholding on Distributions not Subject to FIRPTA. For U.S. federal income tax withholding purposes, we generally will withhold tax at the rate of individuals, trusts and estates have been generally reduced and (ii) non-corporate taxpayers are permitted to take a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received from REITs that are not30% on the amount of any distribution (other than distributions designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income,distributions of USRPI gain subject to certain limitations.FIRPTA as discussed above) made to a Non‑U.S. Stockholder, unless the Non‑U.S. Stockholder provides us with appropriate documentation (1) evidencing that such Non‑U.S. Stockholder is eligible for an exemption or reduced rate under an applicable income tax treaty, generally an IRS Form W‑8BEN or W-8BEN-E (in which case we will withhold at the lower treaty rate) or (2) claiming that the dividend is effectively connected with the Non‑U.S. Stockholder’s conduct of a trade or business within the U.S., generally an IRS Form W‑8ECI (in which case we will not withhold tax). We also may be require to withhold tax at the rate of 21% on the portion of any dividend to a Non-U.S. Stockholder that is or could be designated by us as a capital gain dividend, even if not attributable to gain on a sale or exchange of an interest in U.S. real property. Such withheld amounts of tax do not represent actual tax liabilities, but rather, represent payments in respect of those tax liabilities described in the preceding
The maximum
two paragraphs. Therefore, such withheld amounts are creditable by the Non‑U.S. Stockholder against its actual U.S. federal income tax rate for corporations has been reduced from 35%liabilities, including those described in the preceding two paragraphs. The Non‑U.S. Stockholder would be entitled to 21%, and corporate alternative minimum tax has been eliminated for corporations, which would generally reduce the amounta refund of any amounts withheld in excess of such Non‑U.S. Stockholder’s actual U.S. federal income tax payable by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and by usliabilities, provided the required information is timely furnished to the extent we wereIRS.

The paragraph under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations - Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders - Qualified Foreign Pension Funds” is replaced in its entirety, such that the revised paragraph reads in full as follows:

Qualified Foreign Pension Funds. For periods on or after December 18, 2015, for FIRPTA purposes neither a “qualified foreign pension fund” nor any “qualified controlled entity” is treated as a Non-U.S. Stockholder. A “qualified foreign pension fund” is an organization or arrangement (i) created or organized in a foreign country, (ii) established by a foreign country (or one or more political subdivisions thereof) or one or more employers to provide retirement or pension benefits to current or former employees (including self-employed individuals) or their designees as a result of, or in consideration for, services rendered, (iii) which does not have a single participant or beneficiary that has a right to more than 5% of its assets or income, (iv) which is subject to corporate U.S. federal incomegovernment regulation and with respect to which annual information about its beneficiaries is provided, or is otherwise available, to relevant local tax (for example, if we distributed less than 100% of our taxableauthorities and (v) with respect to which, under its local laws, (A) contributions that would otherwise be subject to tax are deductible or excluded from its gross income or recognized built-in gains in assets acquiredtaxed at a reduced rate, or (B) taxation of its investment income is deferred, or such income is excluded from C corporations).its gross income or taxed at a reduced rate. A “qualified controlled entity” is an entity all the interests of which are held by a qualified foreign pension fund. Alternatively, under proposed Treasury Regulations that taxpayers generally may rely on, but which are subject to change, a “qualified controlled entity” is a trust or corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country all of the interests of which are held by one or more qualifiedforeign pension funds either directly or indirectly through one or more qualified controlled entities or partnerships. Distributions received by qualified foreign pension funds and qualified controlled entities will be taxed as described above at - Distributions - In addition,General regardless of whether the maximum withholding rate on distributions by usdistribution is attributable to non-U.S. stockholders that arethe sale of a USRPI. Gain of a qualified foreign pension fund or qualified controlled entity treated as attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a U.S. real property interest is reducedour stock as well as our capital gain dividends and distributions treated as gain from 35% to 21%.
Certain new limitations on the deductibilitysale or exchange of interest expense now apply, which limitations may affectour stock under the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by us or our TRSs. However, a taxpayer that qualifies as a real estate business may elect torules described above at - Distributions - In General, will not be exempt from such limitations on the deductibility of interest expense.
Certain new limitations on net operating losses now apply, which limitations may affect net operating losses generated by us or our TRSs.
A U.S. tax-exempt stockholder that is subject to tax on its unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) will be required to separately compute its taxable income and loss for each unrelatedunless such gain is treated as effectively connected with the qualified foreign pension fund's (or the qualified controlled entity's, as applicable) conduct of a U.S. trade or business, activity for purposes of determining its UBTI.

New accounting rulesin which case the qualified foreign pension fund (or qualified controlled entity) generally require uswill be subject to recognize income items for federala tax at the same graduated rates applicable to U.S. Stockholders, unless an applicable income tax purposes no later than when we taketreaty provides otherwise, and may be subject to the item into account for financial statement purposes, which may accelerate our recognition30% branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits, subject to adjustments, in the case of certain income items.a foreign corporation.


Item 1A. Risk Factors.Factors.
Investors should carefully consider the following factors, together with all the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating the Company and our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, the trading price of the General Partner'sVEREIT's securities could decline and its stockholders and/or the Operating Partnership's unitholders may lose all or part of their investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. This “Risk Factors” section contains references to our “capital stock” and to our “stockholders” and “unitholders.” Unless expressly stated otherwise, references to our “capital stock” represent the General Partner’s common stockVEREIT’s Common Stock and any class or series of its preferred stock, references to our “stockholders” represent holders of the General Partner’s common stockVEREIT’s Common Stock and any class or series of its preferred stock, and references to our “unitholders” represent holders of the OP unitsUnits and any class of series of the Operating Partnership’s preferred units.


Risks Related to Our Business
We are primarily dependent on single-tenant leases for our revenue and, accordingly, if we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire, on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We focus our investment activities on ownership of freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties that are net leased to a single tenant.commercial properties. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default by, a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, this risk is increased where we lease multiple properties to the extent that we enter intoa single tenant under a master lease with a particular tenant,lease. In such an instance, a default specific to a particular property could result in a termination of the entire master lease, resulting in the loss of revenue from all suchproperties under the master lease.
We are subject to competition in the leasing of our properties.
We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of retail, restaurant, industrial and office real estate, many of which have greater financial and other resources than we do. We cannot assure you that our leases will be renewed or that we will be able to lease or re-lease the properties on favorable terms, or at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the properties at a loss. Any ofIf our properties thatare nearing the end of the lease term or become vacant could be difficult to re-leaseand our competitors offer alternative space at rental rates below current market rates or sell. We havebelow the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and may continue to experience vacancies either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. We typically must incur all of the costs of ownership for a property that is vacant. Upon or pending the expiration of leases at our properties, we may be requiredpressured to makereduce our rental rates below those we currently charge, offer substantial rent or other concessions, to tenants, orand accommodate requests for lower rents, remodeling and other improvements in order to retain andtenants when such tenants’ leases expire or to attract new tenants. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant (e.g., a retail bank branch or distribution warehouse) and major renovations and expenditures may be required in order for us to re-lease the space for other uses. Any of our properties that become vacant could be difficult to sell or re-lease at similar or favorable rental rates or at all. We have and may continue to experience vacancies due to the default of a tenant under its lease, the expiration of one of our leases or if we are not willing to agree to existing or new tenant accommodations or concessions. We typically must incur all of the costs of ownership for a property that is vacant. If the vacancies continue, for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues,rental income, resulting in less cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders. If we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire, on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We are subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to certain tenants, geographic areas or industries.
As of December 31, 2017,We have tenant, geographic and industry concentrations within our portfolio and as we had derived approximately:
$75.4 million,continue to acquire properties, our portfolio may become more concentrated by tenant, geographic area or 6.5%, of our annualized rental income from Red Lobster®, a wholly owned subsidiary of Golden Gate Capital;
$343.8 million, or 29.8%, of our annualized rental income from properties located in the following four states: Texas (12.8%), Ohio (5.9%), Florida (5.6%), and Illinois (5.5%); and
$612.7 million, or 53.0%, of our annualized rental income from tenants in the following six industries: the casual dining restaurant industry (13.8%), the manufacturing industry (10.1%), the quick service restaurant industry (8.9%), the discount retail industry (8.1%), the pharmacy retail industry (7.1%) and the grocery & supermarket retail industry (5.0%).
industry. Any adverse change in the financial condition of a tenant with whom we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, or any downturn of the economy in any state or industry in which we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us. These concentrations may also strengthen tenant bargaining power and make us more susceptible to adverse regulatory changes, natural disasters or other unexpected events that may impact a particular tenant, geographic location or industry which could negatively affect our operations or result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.


Our net leases may require us to pay property-related expenses that are not the obligations of our tenants.
Under the terms of the majority of our net leases, in addition to satisfying their rent obligations, our tenants are responsible for the payment or reimbursement of property expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. However, under the provisions of certain existing leases and leases that we may enter into in the future with our tenants, we may be required to pay some or all of the expenses of the property, such as the costs of environmental liabilities, roof and structural repairs, real estate taxes, insurance, certain non-structural repairs and maintenance. If our properties incur significant expenses that must be paid by us under the terms of our leases, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders may be reduced.
Our properties may be subject to impairment charges.
We routinely evaluate our real estate investments for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions and tenant performance. For example, the early termination of, or default under, a lease by a tenant may lead to an impairment charge. Since our investment focus is on properties net leased to a single tenant, the financial failure of, or other default by, a single tenant under its lease(s) may result in a significant impairment loss. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, we would be required to make a downward adjustment to the net carrying value of the property, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge is recorded. Management has recorded impairment charges related to certain properties in the year ended December 31, 2017, and may record future impairments based on actual results and changes in circumstances. Negative developments in the real estate market may cause management to reevaluate the business and macro-economic assumptions used in its impairment analysis. Changes in management’s assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. See “Note 9 – Fair Value Measures” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of real estate impairment charges.
Our ownership of certain properties and other facilities are subject to ground leases or other similar agreements which limit our uses of these properties and may restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer such properties.
As of December 31, 2017, we held interests in properties and other facilities through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located and we may acquire additional properties in the future that are subject to ground leases or other similar agreements. As of December 31, 2017, the costs associated with these ground leases represented 2.0% of annualized rental revenue. Many of our ground leases and other similar agreements limit our uses of these properties and may restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer such properties without the ground landlord’s consent, which may impair their value.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and therefore we may not be able to dispose of properties when appropriate or on favorable terms.terms which could, among other things, adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
We expect to hold our real estate investments until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our investment objectives and REIT qualification limitations. We generally intend to hold properties for an extended period of time, but our management or Board of Directors may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property (including

in connection with joint venture arrangements) to achieve investment or portfolio objectives. Real estate investments are, in general, relatively illiquid and may become even more illiquid during periods of economic downturn. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms or at all depends on certain factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers, the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties and the quality of the underlying tenant. In addition, if our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at all or at favorable pricing or terms. Furthermore, we may be required to seek modifications of an underlying lease or expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. As a result, once we determine to sell a property we may not be able to do so quickly, on favorable terms or at all. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions that may affect the disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties quicklyat a profit or on favorable terms in response to changesat all in the economy or other conditions when it otherwisefuture, which may be prudentimpact the extent to do so. which our stockholders and unitholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments.
In addition, certain significant real property expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including debt service obligations, real estate taxes, and operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable disposition revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings. Further, as a result of the 100% prohibited transactions tax applicable to REITs, we intend to hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be favorable. Therefore, we may be unable to adjust our portfolio promptly in response to economic, market or other conditions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our investments in
A substantial portion of our properties where the underlying tenant hasare leased to tenants with a below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating agencies, or where the tenant isare leased to tenants that are not rated, and may have a greater risk of default.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, approximately 60.4%61.4% of our tenants were not rated or did not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency or were not affiliates of companies having an investment grade credit rating.rating, which percentage may increase over time, including as property acquisition volume increases. Our investments in properties leased to such tenants may have a greater risk of default and bankruptcy than investments in properties leased exclusively to investment grade tenants.tenants, and these tenants may be more susceptible to default if economic conditions decline, including in the tenant’s industry. When we invest in properties where the tenant does not have a publicly available credit rating, we will use certain credit-assessment tools as well as rely on our own estimatesunderwriting and analysis of the tenant’s credit rating which includes, among other things, reviewing the tenant’s financial information (e.g., financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity, if applicable). If our ratings estimates are inaccurate, the default or bankruptcy risk for the subject tenant may be greater than anticipated. If our lender or a credit rating agency disagrees with our ratings estimates, we may not be able to obtain our desired level of leverage or

our financing costs may exceed those that we projected. This outcomeThese outcomes could have an adverse impact on our returns on that assetthe assets and hence our operating results.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, including as a result of uncertain market conditions, which could adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
We expect to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our investment business objectives and REIT limitations. We generally intend to hold properties for an extended time, but our management or Board of Directors may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property to achieve investment objectives. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms or at all depends on certain factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell such properties at a profit or at all in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which our stockholders and unitholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will depend upon fluctuating market conditions. Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold.
Dividends paid from sources other than our cash flow from operations could affect our profitability, restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and dilute stockholders’ and unitholders’ interests in us.
We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to pay dividends and we may in the future pay dividends from sources other than from our cash flow from operations, such as from the proceeds of property or other asset dispositions, borrowings (including on our existing Revolving Credit Facility), cash and cash equivalents balances, and/or the saleofferings of assets debt and/or the proceeds from offerings ofequity securities. We have not established any limit on the amount of borrowings and/or the sale of property or other assets or the proceeds from an offering of debt or equity securities that may be used to fund dividends, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make dividend distributions that would: (1) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (2) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences; or (3) jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT.
Funding dividends from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for portfolio investments, which may affect our ability to increase our property acquisitions and our profitability. Funding dividends with the sale of property or other assets or the proceeds of offerings of debt or equity securities may affect our ability to generate cash flows. In addition, funding dividends from the sale of additional securities could dilute your interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock or securities that are convertible or exercisable into shares of our common stock to third party investors. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced. Payment of dividends from these sources could affect our profitability, restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and dilute stockholders’ and unitholders’ interests in us, any or all of which may adversely affect your overall return. In addition, funding dividends from the sale of additional debt or equity securities could dilute your interest in us if we sell shares of our Common Stock or securities that are convertible or exercisable into shares of our Common Stock. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced.

We could face potential adverse effects from the bankruptcies or insolvencies of tenants or from tenant defaults generally.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. Under bankruptcy law, a tenant cannot be evicted solely because of its bankruptcy and has the option to assume or reject any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent will be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and it is unlikely that a bankrupt tenant that rejects its lease would pay in full amounts it owes us under the lease. Even if a lease is assumed and brought current, we still run the risk that a tenant could condition lease assumption on a restructuring of certain terms, including rent, that would have an adverse impact on us. Any shortfall resulting from the bankruptcy of one or more of our tenants could adversely affect our cash flows and results of operations and could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
In addition, the financial failure of, or other default by, one or more of the tenants to whom we have exposure could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations. While we evaluate the creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing available financial and other pertinent information, there can be no assurance that any tenant will be able to make timely rental payments or avoid defaulting under its lease. If any of our tenants’ businesses experience significant adverse changes, they may fail to make rental payments when due, close a number of stores,business locations, exercise early termination rights (to the extent such rights are available to the tenant) or declare bankruptcy. A default by a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, if a tenant defaults, we may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment.


If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized by the IRS or in a tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding, our REIT status or financial condition could be adversely affected.
We have entered and may continue to enter into sale-leaseback transactions. In a sale-leaseback transaction, we purchase a property and then lease it back to the third party from whom we purchased it. InThe IRS could challenge our characterization of certain leases and re-characterize them as financing transactions or loans for U.S. federal income tax purposes or, in the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a sale-leaseback transaction structured as a sale-leaseback might possibly be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, eitherventure.
If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized by the IRS, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification tests and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of which outcomesre-characterization. Alternatively, such a re-characterization could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows andcause the amount availableof our REIT taxable income to be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for distribution toa taxable year and thus lose our stockholders and unitholders.
IfREIT status. Further, if a sale-leaseback is re-characterized as a financing, we would not be considered the owner of the property and, as a result, would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. TheIn bankruptcy, the tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback is re-characterized as a joint venture, our lesseetenant and we could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the lesseetenant relating to the property.

We have a history of operating losses and cannot assure you that we will achieve or maintain profitability.
Since our inception in 2010, we have experienced net losses (calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP)GAAP”) and as of December 31, 2017,2019, had an accumulated deficit of $4.78$6.40 billion. The extent of our future operating losses and the timing of when we will achieve profitability are uncertain, and together depend on the demand for, and value of, our portfolio of properties. We may never achieve or sustainmaintain profitability.
We may be unable to enter into and consummate property acquisitions on advantageous terms or our property acquisitions may not perform as we expect due to competitive conditions and other factors.

We mayintend to acquire properties in the future. The acquisition of properties entails various risks, including the risks that our investments may not perform as we expect and that our cost estimates for bringing an acquired property up to market standards may prove inaccurate. Further, we expect to finance any future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings (including under our unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”)Revolving Credit Facility), cash and cash equivalent balances, proceeds from equity and/or debt offerings by the General Partner,VEREIT, the Operating Partnership or their subsidiaries, fundscash flow from operations and proceeds from property contributions andor other asset dispositions which, if unavailable, could adversely affect our cash flows.


In addition, our ability to acquire properties in the future on satisfactory terms and successfully integrate and operate such properties is subject to the following significant risks:

we may be unable to acquire desired properties or the purchase price of a desired property may increase significantly because of competition from other real estate investors, including other real estate operating companies, REITs and investment funds;
we may acquire properties that are not accretive to our earnings upon acquisition;
we may be unable to obtain the necessary debt or equity financing to consummate an acquisition or, if obtainable, financing may not be on satisfactory terms;
we may need to spend more than budgeted amounts to make necessary improvements or renovations to acquired properties;
agreements for the acquisition of properties are typically subject to customary conditions to closing, including satisfactory completion of due diligence investigations, and we may spend significant time and money on potential acquisitions that we do not consummate;
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations; and
we may acquire properties and assume existing liabilities without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, for liabilities, whether known or unknown, quantifiable or unquantifiable, such as tax liabilities, accrued but unpaid liabilities, cleanup of environmental contamination, remediation of latent defects, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.

Any of the above risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

We have assumed, and may in the future assume, liabilities in connection with our property acquisitions, including unknown liabilities.
We have assumed existing liabilities, some of which may have been unknown or unquantifiable at the time of the transaction. Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions, claims of tenants or other persons dealing with prior owners of the properties, tax liabilities, and accrued but unpaid liabilities whether incurred in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. If the magnitude of such unknown liabilities is high, either singly or in the aggregate, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
We face intense competition, which may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.
We are subject to competition in the leasing of our properties. We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of retail, restaurant, industrial and office real estate, many of which have greater financial and other resources than us. Many of our competitors own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located. If one of our properties is nearing the end of the lease term or becomes vacant and our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge or to offer substantial rent concessions in order to retain tenants when such tenants’ lease expire or attract new tenants. In addition, if our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in the same markets and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at all or at favorable pricing or on favorable terms. As a result of these actions by our competitors, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may be adversely affected.
The value of our real estate investments is subject to risks including risks associated with our real estate assets and with the real estate industry.
Our real estate investments are subject to various risks, fluctuations and cycles in value and demand, many of which are beyond our control. Certain events may decrease our cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders, as well as the value of our properties. These risks and events include, but are not limited to:

adverse changes in international, national or local economic and demographic conditions;
vacancies or our inability to lease space on favorable terms, including possible market pressures to offer tenants rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights or tenant-favorable renewal options;
adverse changes in financial conditions of buyers, sellers and tenants of properties;
ongoing disruption and/or consolidation in the retail sector;
negative developments in the real estate market, including tenant performance, that may cause management to reevaluate the business and macro-economic assumptions used in the impairment analysis of our properties, which may cause us to determine that an impairment has occurred and may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements;
inability to collect rent from tenants, or other failures by tenants to perform the obligations under their leases;
competition from other real estate investors, including other real estate operating companies, REITs and institutional investment funds;
the obsolescence of our properties over time, including as a result of age or a shift in market preference, which could impact our ability to re-tenant a property, particularly if the property was built to suit a particular tenant;
our ownership or future acquisition of properties subject to leasehold interests in the land (i.e., ground leases) or other similar agreements with terms different than the related operating lease for the property, may limit our uses of these properties and may restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer such properties without the ground landlord’s consent, all of which may impair their value;
reductions in the level of demand for commercial space generally, and freestanding net leased properties specifically, and changes in the relative popularity of our tenants and/or properties;
increases in the supply of freestanding single-tenant properties;
fluctuations in interest rates, which could adversely affect our ability, or the ability of buyers and tenants of our properties, to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all;
increases in expenses, including, but not limited to, insurance costs, labor costs, energy prices, real estate assessments and other taxes and costs of compliance with laws, regulations and governmental policies, all of which have an adverse impact on the rent a tenant may be willing to pay us in order to lease one or more of our properties;
loss of property rights, adverse impacts on our tenants’ business operations and/or increases in tenant vacancies resulting from eminent domain proceedings;

civil unrest, acts of God, including earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters, including extreme weather events or damage from rising sea levels from possible future climate change, which may result in uninsured losses, and acts of war or terrorism; and
changes in, and changes in enforcement of, laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety, environmental, zoning and tax laws, governmental fiscal policies and the AmericansADA.

In addition, our properties are subject to the ADA and while our tenants are obligated to comply with Disabilities Act.the ADA and may be obligated under our leases to pay for the costs associated with compliance with the ADA, if compliance involves expenditures that are greater than anticipated or if tenants fail or are unable to comply, we may be required to incur expenses to bring a property into compliance.
Any or all of these factors could materially adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs.


Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could materially adversely affect our financial condition and cash flows, and there can be no assurance as to future costs and the scope of coverage that may be available under insurance policies.
We carry comprehensivecommercial general liability, fire, extended coverage,flood, earthquake, and property and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under one or more blanket insurance policies with policy specifications, limits and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. In addition, weWe carry professional liability, and directors’ and officers’ insurance, and cyber liability insurance. We select policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, insurance coverages provided by tenants, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. There can be no assurance, however, that the insured limits on any particular policy will adequately cover an insured loss if one occurs. If any such loss is insured, we may be required to pay a significant deductible on any claim for recovery of such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us for the loss, or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage for the loss. In addition, we may reduce or discontinue terrorism, earthquake, flood or other insurancecertain coverages on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss. Our title insurance policies may not insure for the current aggregate market value of our portfolio, and we do not intend to increase our title insurance coverage as the market value of our portfolio increases.
Further, weWe do not carry insurance for certain losses including, but not limited to, losses caused by riots, war or nuclear explosions. Certainand certain types of losses may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes,nuclear explosions, riots or acts of war. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, ifIf the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. In addition, we carry several different lines of insurance, placed with several large insurance carriers. If any one of these large insurance carriers were to become insolvent, we would be forced to replace the existing insurance coverage with another suitable carrier, and any outstanding claims would be at risk for collection. In such an event, we cannot be certain that we would be able to replace the coverage at similar or otherwise favorable terms. As a result of any of the situations described above, our financial condition and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
We face possible risks associated with the physical effects of climate change which could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations and business.

Climate change, including rising sea levels, flooding, extreme weather, changes in precipitation and temperature, and air quality, may result in physical damage to, a decrease in demand for, and/or a decrease in rent from and value of our properties located in the areas affected by these conditions. A number of our properties are located in areas that have historically been impacted by earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, and tornadoes. To the extent climate change causes increased changes in weather patterns, our markets could experience heightened storm intensity and rising sea-levels. These conditions could result in declining demand for leased space in our buildings or an inability to operate the buildings at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we and/or our tenants find acceptable. There can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations or business. 

Our participation in joint ventures creates additional risks as compared to direct real estate investments, and the actions of our joint venture partners could adversely affect our operations or performance.
We haveparticipate in the past participated, and may in the future participate in additional transactions structured to purchase and dispose of assets jointly with unaffiliated third parties (a “joint venture”)., including the management of these joint ventures. There are additional risks involved in joint venture transactions. Astransactions apart from those associated with purchasing property directly. For example, as a co-investor in a joint venture, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority relating to significant decisions affecting

the property, joint venture, or other entity.property. In addition, there is the potential of the third-party participantco-participant in the joint venture becoming bankrupt and the possibility of diverging or inconsistent economic or business interests of us and that participant. We may also provide non-recourse guarantees of the indebtedness of the joint venture. These diverging interests could result in, among other things, exposure to liabilities of the joint venture in excess of our proportionate share of these liabilities. The competing rights of each owner in a jointly-owned property could effect a reduction in the value of each owner’s interest in the subject property.

If we are unable to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and effective internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence and our stock price could be adversely affected.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 20172019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, however, there can be no guarantee as to the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and we cannot assure you that our internal control over financial reporting will not be subject to material weaknesses in the future. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Government investigations relatingHistorical 1031 real estate programs we manage may divert resources from our core business operations and may subject us to unexpected liabilities and costs.
We continue to serve as the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation may result in significant legal expenses, fines, and/or penalties, including indemnification obligations, and cause our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations to suffer.
On November 13, 2014, we received the first of two subpoenas relating to the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation from the staff of the SEC, each of which called for the productionasset manager of certain documents. On December 19, 2014,1031 real estate programs. While the volume of programs under management has been decreasing, we received a subpoenacontinue to manage the remaining properties which requires the allocation of staff and other Company resources. Continuing management of these programs may divert resources from the Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York also contacted counsel for the Companyour core business operations and counsel for the Audit Committee. We

are cooperating with these regulators in their investigations. The amount of time needed to resolve these investigations is uncertain, and, although the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York has indicated that it does not intend to bring criminal charges against the Company arising from its investigation, we cannot predict the outcome of other investigations or whether we will face additional government investigations, inquiries or other actions related to these matters. Subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our current and former directors, officers and employees, among others in connection with the ongoing government investigations and potential future government inquiries, investigations or actions, including advancement of legal fees. These matters could result in actions seeking, among other things, injunctions against usunexpected liabilities and the payment of significant fines and/or penalties, as well as requiring payment of substantial legal fees and indemnification obligations, and cause our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations to suffer. We can provide no assurance as to the outcome of any government investigation.costs, including potential litigation.
The Company and certain of our former officers and directors, among others, have been named as defendantsChanges in various lawsuits related to the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation which have resulted in significant legal expenses which are expected to continue. Any resolutionaccounting pronouncements could require substantial payments by the Company, including indemnification obligations, and may materiallyadversely impact our business,or our tenants’ reported financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.performance.
Since the October 29, 2014 announcement of the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation and the subsequent restatement of the Company’s financial statements in March 2015, the Company and its former officers and directors (along with others) have been named as defendants in multiple putative securities class action complaints in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which were subsequently consolidated under the caption In re American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Litigation, 1:15-mc-00040-AKH, multiple individual securities lawsuits and multiple derivative lawsuits. See “Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding pending litigation matters related to the Audit Committee Investigation.
As a result of the various pending litigations, and subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to advance certain legal expenses to and indemnify our current and former directors, officers and employees, as well as certain outside individuals and entities. These lawsuits have resulted in significant ongoing legal expenses, which are expected to continue. The resolution of these matters, and the timing thereof, are uncertain. Any such resolution, whether through a judgment or a settlement, could require substantial payments by the Company, including potential indemnification obligations, which in large part are not expected to be covered by insurance, and may materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our accountingAccounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial positioncondition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on our reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on our tenants’ reported financial condition or results of operations and they require management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial position and results of operations. We have identified several accounting policies as being critical to the presentation of our financial position and results of operations because they require management to make particularly subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be recorded under different conditions or using different assumptions. Because of the inherent uncertainty of the estimates, judgments, and assumptions associated with these critical accounting policies, we cannot provide any assurance that we will not make subsequent significant adjustments to our consolidated financial statements. If our judgments, assumptions, and allocations prove to be incorrect, or if circumstances change, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Changes in U.S. accounting standardsaffect their preferences regarding operating leases may make the leasing of our properties less attractive to our potential tenants, which could reduce overall demand for our leasing services.
Under current authoritative accounting guidance for leases, a lease is classified by a tenant as a capital lease if the significant risks and rewards of ownership are considered to reside with the tenant. Under capital lease accounting for a tenant, both the leased asset and liability are reflected on its balance sheet. If the lease does not meet the criteria for a capital lease, the lease is to be considered an operating lease by the tenant, and the obligation does not appear on the tenant’s balance sheet; rather, the contractual future minimum payment obligations are only disclosed in the footnotes thereto. Thus, entering into an operating lease can appear to enhance a tenant’s balance sheet in comparison to direct ownership. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”) conducted a joint project to re-evaluate lease accounting. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”) which will require that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability and the disclosure of key information about the entity's leasing arrangements. These and other potential changes to the accounting guidance could affect both our accounting for leases as well as that of our current and potential tenants. These changes may affect how our real estate leasing business is conducted. For example, with the ASU 2016-02 revision, companies may be less willing to enter into leases in general or desire to enter into

leases with shorter terms because the apparent benefits to their balance sheets under current practice could be reduced or eliminated. This impact in turn could make it more difficult for us to enter into leases on terms we find favorable. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company expects the accounting for leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee to change and is currently evaluating the impact. Leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee primarily consist of corporate offices and ground leases.estate.
We may not be able to maintain our competitive advantages if we are not able to attract and retain key personnel.
Our success depends to a significant extent on our ability to attract and retain key members of our executive team and staff. Our future success depends in part on the continued service of our senior management team.teams and staff supporting our continuing operations. If there are changes in senior leadership affecting our continuing operations, such changes could be disruptive and could compromise our ability to executeoperate our strategic plan.business. While we have entered into employment agreements with certain key personnel, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain the services of individuals whose knowledge and skills are important to our businesses. Our success also depends on our ability to prospectively attract, integrate, train and retain qualified management personnel. Because the competition for qualified personnel is intense, costs related to compensation and retention could increase significantly in the future. If we were to lose a sufficient number of our key employees and were unable to replace them in a reasonable period of time, these losses could damage our business and adversely affect our results of operations.

Competition that traditional retail tenants face from e-commerce retail sales, or the integration of brick and mortar stores with e-commerce retailers, could adversely affect our business.
Our retail tenants continue to face increasingincreased competition from e-commerce retailers. E-commerce sales have accountedcontinue to account for an increasing percentage of retail sales, over the past few years and this trend is expected to continue.continue as our retail tenants continue to look for ways to increase their e-commerce presence and/or integrate their brick and mortar stores with an e-commerce platform. These trends may have an impact on decisions that retailers make regarding their brick and mortar stores. Changes in shopping trends as a result of the growth in e-commerce may also impact the profitability of retailers that do not adapt to changes in market conditions. The continued growth of e-commerce sales could decrease the need for traditional retail outlets and reduce retailers' space and property requirements. These conditions could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows if we are unable to meet the needs of our tenants or if our tenants encounter financial difficulties as a result of changing market conditions.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships or reputation, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack (e.g., the application of banking or other malware to intercept funds) or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations (e.g., disruption of finance or accounting systems that process or receive payment obligations, manage cash, warehouse data and other processes and procedures), misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant and investor relationships. In addition, from time to time, we update, modify or change our information systems and, although we have taken steps to protect the security of the data and systems, our security measures may not be able to prevent cyber incidents resulting from such modifications or changes. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. We have implemented processes, procedures (including training and recovery procedures) and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results, operations, business relationships or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident. The remediation of a cyber incident could result in significant unplanned expenditures and our cash flows and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions, which could result in the dilution of our stockholders and unitholders, and limit our ability to sell or refinance such assets.
We have in the past and may in the future acquire properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions in exchange for OP Units. Under the limited partnership agreementThird Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding the OP Units for a period of one year, unless otherwise consented to by the General Partner, holders of OP Units have a right to redeem the OP Units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of the General Partner’s common stockCommon Stock or, at the option of the General Partner, a corresponding number of shares of the General Partner’s common stock.Common Stock. This could result in the dilution of our stockholders and unitholders through the issuance of OP Units that may be exchanged for shares of our common stock.Common Stock. This acquisition structure may also have the effect of, among other things, reducing the amount of tax depreciation we could deduct over the tax life of the acquired properties, and may require that we agree to restrictions on our ability to dispose of, or refinance the debt on, the acquired properties in order to protect the contributors’ ability to defer recognition of taxable gain. Similarly, we may be required to incur or maintain debt we would otherwise not incur so we can allocate the debt to the contributors to maintain their tax bases. These restrictions could limit our ability to sell or refinance an asset at a time, or on terms, that would be favorable absent such restrictions.

Risks Related to Financing
We intend to rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if we encounter difficulty in obtaining such capital, we may not be able to meet maturing obligations or make any additional investments.
In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required, among other things, to distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. Because of this dividend requirement, we may not be able to fund from cash retained from operations all of our future capital needs, including capital needed to refinance maturing obligations or make investments.

Market volatility and disruption could hinder our ability to obtain new debt financing or refinance our maturing debt on favorable terms or at all or to raise debt and equity capital. Our access to capital will depend upon a number of factors, including:
general market conditions;
the market’s perception of our future growth potential;
the extent of investor interest;
analyst reports about us and the REIT industry;
the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;
our financial performance and that of our tenants;
our current debt levels;
our current and expected future earnings;
our cash flow and cash dividends, including our ability to satisfy the dividend requirements applicable to REITs; and
the market price per share of our common stock.
Common Stock. If we are unable to obtain needed capital on satisfactory terms or at all, we may not be able to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature or make any additional investments.
We have substantial amounts of indebtedness outstanding, which may affect our ability to pay dividends, and may expose us to interest rate fluctuation risk and to the risk of default under our debt obligations.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $5.7 billion of debt outstanding, including net premiums and net deferred financing costs. We cannot assure you that our aggregatebusiness will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future sources of cash will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay amounts due on our indebtedness was $6.1 billion.or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may incur significantsubstantial additional debt in the future, including borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and other types of debt, as our business strategy contemplates the use of debt to finance long-term growth and our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of debt that we may incur upon approval by our Board, without stockholder approval. We may incur additional debt for various purposes including, without limitation, the funding of future acquisitions, capital improvements and leasing commissions in connection with the repositioning of a property and litigation expenses. At December 31, 2017, we had $2.1 billion of undrawn commitments underproperties which would increase our Credit Facility.debt service obligations. Our substantial outstanding indebtedness, and the limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements, could have significant adverse consequences, including as follows:
our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments;
we may be unable to borrow additional funds as needed or on satisfactory terms to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements, which could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to capitalize upon any acquisition opportunities or fund capital improvements and leasing commissions;
we may be unable to pay off or refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness;indebtedness and will depend on, among other things, our financial condition and market conditions at the time, restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness, general economic and capital market conditions, the availability of credit from banks or other lenders, and investor confidence in us;
payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to make the dividend payments necessary to maintain our REIT qualification or may otherwise impose restrictions on our ability to make distributions;
we may be forced to dispose of properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms;
we may violate restrictive covenants in our loan documents, which would entitle the lenders to accelerate our debt obligations;
certain of the property subsidiaries’ loan documents may include restrictions that limit the subsidiary’s ability to take certain actions with respect to the property, including restrictions on suchthe subsidiary’s ability to make dividends to us;us or restrictions that require us to obtain lender consent which could adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or otherwise address issues with the property;
certain of our borrowings, and our future borrowings may, bear interest at variable rates and increases in interest rates would result in higher interest expenses on our existing unhedged variable rate debt and increase the costs of refinancing existing debt or incurring new debt;
we may be unable to hedge floating-rate debt, counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under our hedge agreements, these agreements may not effectively hedge interest rate fluctuation risk, and, upon the expiration of any hedge agreements, we would be exposed to then-existing market rates of interest and future interest rate volatility;

we may default on our obligations and the lenders or mortgagees may foreclose on our properties that secure their loans and exercise their rights under any assignment of rents and leases;
we may be vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and
we may be at a disadvantage compared to our competitors with less indebtedness.

If we default under a loan or indenture (including any default in respect of the financial maintenance and negative covenants contained in the Credit Agreement, or the indenture governing the Senior Notes,Notes), we may automatically be in default under any other loan or indenture that has cross-default provisions (including the credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”)), dated June 30, 2014, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as administrative agent, and other lender parties thereto, governing the Credit Facility)Agreement), and (x) further borrowings under the Credit Facility will be prohibited, and outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, and our indenture (including the indenture governing the Senior Notes) or such other loans may be accelerated and (y) to the extent any such debt is secured, directly or

indirectly, by any properties or assets, the lenders may foreclose on the properties or assets securing such indebtedness. Further, any foreclosure on our properties could create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, which could adversely affect our ability to meet the REIT dividend requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.
In addition, increases in interest rates may impede our operating performance and payments of required debt service obligations or amounts due at maturity, or creation of additional reserves under loan agreements or indentures, could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
Further, any foreclosure on our properties could create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, which could adversely affectthe REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to meethedge our liabilities. Generally, any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or to offset certain other positions, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through taxable REIT dividend requirements imposed bysubsidiaries (“TRS”). This could increase the Internal Revenue Code.cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such TRS.
The indenture governing our Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement contain restrictive covenants that limit our operating flexibility.
The indenture governing our Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement require us to meetcomply with customary affirmative and negative covenants and other financial and operating covenants. Thecovenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to take specific actions (e.g., consummate a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets or incur or guarantee additional secured and unsecured indebtedness).
In addition, the indenture governing our Senior Notes requires us, among other things, to maintain financial ratios for totala maximum unencumbered leverage secured debt, debt service coverageratio and total unencumbered assets. In addition, the Credit Agreement requires us, among other things, to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum secured leverage ratio, a totalmaximum unencumbered asset value ratio, a minimum encumbered interest coverageleverage ratio and a minimum encumbered asset value. These covenants restrict our ability to incur secured or unsecured indebtednessunencumbered interest coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement also includes customary restrictions on, among other items, liens, negative pledges, intercompany transfers, fundamental changes, transactions with affiliates and may also restrict our ability to engage in certain business activities.restricted payments.
Our ability to comply with these and other provisions of the indenture governing our Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement may be affected by changes in our operating and financial performance, changes in general business and economic conditions, adverse regulatory developments or other events adversely impacting us. Any failure to comply with these covenants would constitute a default under the indenture governing our Senior Notes and/or the Credit Agreement, as applicable, and would prevent further borrowings under the Credit Agreement and could cause those and other obligations to become due and payable. If any of our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to repay it.
Our organizational documents have no limitation on the amount of indebtedness that we may incur. As a result, we may become more highly leveraged in the future, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our business strategy contemplates the use of both secured and unsecured debt to finance long-term growth. While we intend to limit our indebtedness, our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of debt that we may incur. Further, our financing decisions and related decisions regarding levels of debt may be determined by our Board of Directors in its discretion without stockholder approval. As a result, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, in the future, subject to us meeting the financial and operating covenants described above, which could result in us becoming more highly leveraged and adversely affecting our financial condition.
Increases in interest rates would increase our debt service obligations and may adversely affect the refinancing of our existing debt and our ability to incur additional debt, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Certain of our borrowings bear interest at variable rates, and we may incur additional variable-rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates would result in higher interest expenses on our existing unhedged variable rate debt, and increase the costs of refinancing existing debt or incurring new debt. Additionally, increases in interest rates may result in a decrease in the value of our real estate and decrease the market price of our capital stock and could accordingly adversely affect our financial condition.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to fund our operations, working capital and capital expenditures, depends on our ability to generate cash. To a certain extent, our cash flow is subject to general economic, industry, financial, competitive, operating, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future sources of cash will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay amounts due on our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Additionally, if we incur additional indebtedness in connection with any future acquisitions or development projects or for any other purpose, our debt service obligations could increase. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional financing will depend on, among other things:
our financial condition and market conditions at the time;
restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness;
general economic and capital market conditions;
the availability of credit from banks or other lenders;
investor confidence in us; and
our results of operations.
As a result, we may not be able to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and additional borrowings or refinancings or proceeds of asset sales or other sources of cash are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our obligations. Accordingly, if we cannot service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as seeking additional equity, or delaying any strategic acquisitions and alliances or capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.
Our Senior Notes are periodically rated by nationally recognized creditCredit rating agencies. Our current corporate credit and issue-levelagencies continually evaluate their ratings for our Senior Notes are “BBB-” with a “stable” outlook from Standard & Poor’s Rating Services. Our corporate credit and issue-level ratings for our Senior Notes are “Baa3” with a “stable” outlook assigned by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. Our corporate credit and issue-level ratings for our Senior Notes are “BBB-“ with a “stable” outlook assigned by Fitch Ratings, Inc.the companies that they follow, including us. The credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook in general. OurThe credit rating agencies also evaluate our industry as a whole and may change their credit ratings canfor us based on their overall view of our industry. Our Senior Notes are periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies, but we cannot be sure that credit rating agencies will maintain their ratings on the Senior Notes. Our current corporate credit and issue-level ratings for our Senior Notes are “BBB-” with a “stable” outlook from Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, “Baa3” with a “positive” outlook assigned by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc., and are “BBB” with a “stable” outlook assigned by Fitch Ratings, Inc. A deterioration in our credit ratings could adversely affect the cost and availability of capital, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Since we depend in part on debt financing to fund our business, an adverse change in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and the trading price of our Senior Notes.

We may be adversely affected by changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined, or the use of alternative reference rates.
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced that it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative to USD-LIBOR. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be published or precisely how SOFR will be calculated and published. Any changes adopted by FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR

may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payments could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form.
We have contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and are monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest amounts on our variable rate debt and the swap rate for our interest rate swaps. In the event that LIBOR is discontinued, the interest rates will be based on a fallback reference rate specified in the applicable documentation governing such debt or swaps or as otherwise agreed upon. Such an event would not affect our ability to borrow or maintain already outstanding borrowings or swaps, but the alternative reference rate could vary from the underlying exposure or be higher and more volatile than LIBOR.
Certain risks arise in connection with transitioning contracts to an alternative reference rate, including any resulting value transfer that may occur. The value of loans, securities, or derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be impacted if LIBOR is limited or discontinued. For some instruments, the method of transitioning to an alternative rate may be challenging, as they may require substantial negotiation with each respective counterparty.
If a contract is not transitioned to an alternative reference rate and LIBOR is discontinued, the impact is likely to vary by contract. If LIBOR is discontinued or if the method of calculating LIBOR changes from its current form, interest rates on our current or future indebtedness may be adversely affected.
While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2021, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable prior to that point. This could result, for example, if sufficient banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate will be accelerated and magnified.
Risks Related to Equity
The Board of Directors may create and issue a class or series of common or preferred stock without stockholder approval.
Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the Board of Directors is empowered under our charter tomay amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our stock, or the number of shares of stock of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue, to designate and issue from time to time one or more classes or series of stock and to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stockCommon Stock or preferred stock without stockholder approval. The Board of Directors may determine the relative preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications or terms or conditions of redemption of any class or series of stock issued. As a result, we may issue series or classes of stock with voting rights, rights to dividends or other rights, senior to the rights of holders of our outstanding capital stock. The issuance of any such stock could also have the effect of diluting our existing equity holders and our expected earnings per share or delaying or preventing a change of control transaction that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, future sales of shares of our common stock or preferred stock may be dilutive to existing stockholders.
The trading price of our common stockCommon Stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations.
The sales price of our common stockCommon Stock on the NYSE has fluctuated in recent quarters. Our stock priceand may continue to fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, including as a result ofincluding: future offerings of our debt and equity securities as a result ofor the events described in this “Risk Factors” section or in our future filings with the SEC, and as a result of changes to our dividend yield relative to yields on other financial instruments (e.g., increases in interest rates resulting in higher yields on other financial instruments may adversely

affect theperception that such sales price of our common stock). In addition, the trading volume and price of our common stock may fluctuate and be adversely impacted in response to a number of factors, including:
could occur; actual or anticipated variations in our operating results, earnings, or liquidity, or those of our competitors;
changes in our dividend policy;
policy or our dividend yield relative to yields on other financial instruments; publication of research reports about us, our competitors, our tenants, or the REIT industry;
���changes in market valuations of companies similar to us;
changes in market valuations of companies similar to us; speculation in the press or investment community;
our failure to meet, or changes to, our earnings estimates, or those of any securities analysts;
increases in market interest rates;
adverse market reaction to the amount of or the maturity of our debt and our ability to refinance such debt and the terms thereof;
adverse market reaction to any additional indebtedness we incur or equity or securities we may issue;
changes in our credit ratings;
changes in our key management;
the financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and prospects of our tenants;
litigation and government investigations;
regulatory changes affecting our industry or our tenants; failure to maintain our REIT qualification; and
general market and economic conditions, including the current state of the credit and capital markets.
The issuance of additional equity securities may dilute existing equity holders.
Giving effect to the issuance of common stock in future potential offerings, the receipt of future potential net proceedsmarkets; and the use of those proceeds, additional equity offerings may have a dilutive effect on our expected earnings per share. Additionally, we are not restricted from issuing additional shares of our common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities in the future. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of salesthe events or realization of a large number of shares ofthe risks described in this “Risk Factors” section or in our common stock infuture filings with the market or the perception that such sales could occur.SEC.

Future offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stockCommon Stock upon liquidation, or preferred equity securities that may be senior to our common stockCommon Stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.Common Stock.
In the future, we may issue debt or preferred equity securities. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock.Common Stock. Additional equity offerings, including offerings of convertible preferred stock, may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or otherwise reduce the market price of our common stock,Common Stock, or both. Holders of our common stockCommon Stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating

distributions or a preference on distribution payments that could limit our ability to make distributions to holders of our common stock.Common Stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stockCommon Stock and diluting their stock holdings in us.
The change of control conversion feature of the Series F Preferred Stock may make it more difficult for a party to take over the Company or discourage a party from taking over the Company.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the Articles Supplementary for the Series F Preferred Stock) the result of which is that our common stockCommon Stock or the common securities of the acquiring or surviving entity are not listed on a national stock exchange, holders of the Series F Preferred Stock will have the right (unless, prior to the change of control conversion date, we have provided or provide notice of our election to redeem the Series F Preferred Stock) to convert some or all of their Series F Preferred Stock into shares of our common stockCommon Stock (or equivalent value of alternative consideration). The change of control conversion feature of the Series F Preferred Stock may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for the Company or of delaying, deferring or preventing certain change of control transactions of the Company under circumstances that stockholders may otherwise believe are in their best interests.

Risks Relating to our Real Estate Investments
Because we own real property, we are subject to extensive environmental regulation, which creates uncertainty regarding future environmental expenditures and liabilities.
Environmental laws regulate, and impose liability for, releases of hazardous or toxic substances into the environment. Under various provisions of these laws, an owner or operator of real estate, such as us, is or may be liable for costs related to soil or groundwater contamination on, in, or migrating to or from its property. In addition, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may be liable for the costs of cleaning up contamination at the disposal site. Such laws often impose liability regardless of whether the person knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances that caused the contamination. The presence of, or contamination resulting from, any of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate them, may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease our property or to borrow using such property as collateral. In addition, persons exposed to hazardous or toxic substances may sue us for personal injury damages. As a result, in connection with our current or former ownership, operation, management and development of real properties, we may be potentially liable for investigation and cleanup costs, penalties, and damages under environmental laws. Further, environmental laws may impose liabilities, costs or operating limitations on our tenants which could adversely affect our tenants’ operations and their ability to make rental payments to us.
Although our properties are generally subjected to preliminary environmental assessments, known as Phase I assessments, by independent environmental consultants that identify certain liabilities, Phase I assessments are limited in scope, and may not include or identify all potential environmental liabilities or risks associated with the property. Further, any environmental liabilities that arose since the date the studies were done would not be identified in the assessments. Unless required by applicable laws or regulations, we may not further investigate, remedy or ameliorate the liabilities disclosed in the Phase I assessments.
We cannot assure you that these or other environmental studies identified all potential environmental liabilities, or that we will not incur material environmental liabilities in the future. If we do incur material environmental liabilities in the future, we may face significant remediation costs, and we may find it difficult to finance or sell any affected properties.
We are subject to risks relating to mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans.
Investing in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans involves risk of defaults on those loans caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. If there are defaults under these loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell quickly any properties securing such loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of any lawsuit brought in connection with the foreclosure if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan, which could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loan.
We are subject to risks relating to real estate-related securities, including commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”).
Real estate-related securities are often unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in real estate-related securities may be subject to risks of (1) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market in the case of unlisted or thinly traded securities, (2) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates in the case of traded equity securities, (3) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer, (4) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (5) the possibility that earnings of the issuer or that income from collateral may be insufficient to meet debt service and distribution obligations and (6) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic slowdown or downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding real estate-related securities and the ability of the obliged parties to repay principal and interest or make distribution payments.
CMBS are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, these securities are subject to the risks listed above and all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. CMBS are issued by investment banks and non-regulated financial institutions, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government. The value of CMBS may change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities market as a whole and may be negatively impacted by any dislocation in the mortgage-backed securities market in general.
CMBS are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate CMBS are paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes delinquent loans, there is a risk that interest payments on subordinate CMBS will not be fully paid. Subordinate CMBS are also subject to greater credit

risk than those CMBS that are more highly rated. In certain instances, third-party guarantees or other forms of credit support can reduce the credit risk.
Our build-to-suit acquisitions are subject to additional risks related to properties under development.
From time to time, we engage in build-to-suit acquisitions and the acquisition of properties under development. In connection with these businesses, we enter into purchase and sale arrangements with sellers or developers of suitable properties under development or construction. In such cases, we are generally obligated to purchase the property at the completion of construction, provided that the construction conforms to definitive plans, specifications, and costs approved by us in advance, and if other conditions have been met, such as there isbeing an effective lease for the property, and the tenant hashaving accepted the property and commenced paying rent. We may also engage in development and construction activities involving existing properties, including the construction of new buildings or the expansion of existing facilities (typically at the request of a tenant) or the development or build-out of vacant space at retail properties.space. We may advance significant amounts in connection with certain development projects.
As a result, we are subject to potential development risks and construction delays and the resultant increased costs and risks, as well as the risk of loss of certain amounts that we have advanced should a development project not be completed. To the extent that we engage in development or construction projects, we may be subject to uncertainties associated with obtaining permits or re-zoning for development, environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and the

builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a developer or builder fails to perform, we may terminate the purchase, modify the construction contract or resort to legal action to compel performance (or in certain cases, we may elect to take over the project and pursue completion of the project ourselves). A developer’s or builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond that party’s control. Delays in obtaining permits or completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases.
We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased project costs or the loss of our investment. Although we rarely engage in construction activities relating to space that is not already leased to one or more tenants, to the extent that we do so, we may be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also will rely on rental incomerevenue and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If these projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property and our return on our investment could suffer. If we contract with a development company for a newly developed property, there is a risk that money advanced to that development company for the project may not be fully recoverable if the developer fails to successfully complete the project.
Risks Related to the Services Agreement
Our continuing obligation to provide services to Cole Capital under the Services Agreement could have an adverse effect on our business operations.

In connection with the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we entered into the Services Agreement, pursuant to which we will continue to provide certain services, including operational real estate support, through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by CCA. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, we will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided and fees based on the future revenues of CCA above a specified dollar threshold (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments. There is no assurance that we will be successful in managing these services so that they do not have an adverse effect on our business operations and there can be no assurance that we will receive any Net Revenue Payments after February 1, 2018, under the Services Agreement.

We are subject to conflicts of interest relating to the Cole REITs.

During the initial term of the Services Agreement, property acquisition opportunities will be allocated among us and the real estate programs sponsored by CCA pursuant to an asset allocation policy and in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement. The Cole REITs have characteristics, including targeted investment types, and investment objectives and criteria substantially similar to our own. As a result, we may be seeking to acquire properties and real estate-related investments at the same time as the Cole REITs.
During the initial term of the Services Agreement, in the event that an investment opportunity is identified that may be suitable for more than one of us or the other programs sponsored by CCA and for which more than one of such entities has sufficient uninvested funds, then an allocation committee, which is comprised of employees of the Company and employees of CIM Group,

LLC, CCA or their respective affiliates, will examine the following factors, among others, in determining the entity for which the investment opportunity is most appropriate:
the investment objective of each entity;
the anticipated operating cash flows of each entity and the cash requirements of each entity;
the effect of the acquisition both on diversification of each entity’s investments by type of property, geographic area and tenant concentration;
the amount of funds available to each entity and the length of time such funds have been available for investment;
the policy of each entity relating to leverage of properties;
the income tax effects of the purchase to each entity; and
the size of the investment.

If, in the judgment of the allocation committee, the investment opportunity may be equally appropriate for more than one program, then the entity that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was allocated an investment opportunity of a similar size and type (e.g., office, industrial, retail properties or anchored shopping centers) will be allocated such investment opportunity. If a subsequent development, such as a delay in the closing of the acquisition or a delay in the construction of a property, causes any such investment, in the opinion of the allocation committee, to be more appropriate for an entity other than the entity that committed to make the investment, the allocation committee may determine that the Company or a program sponsored by CCA will make the investment.

For programs sponsored by CCA that commenced operations on or after March 5, 2013, the Company retains a right of first refusal for all opportunities to acquire real estate and real estate-related assets or portfolios with a purchase price greater than $100 million. This right of first refusal applies to CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V, but does not apply to CCPT IV or INAV.

There can be no assurance that these policies will be adequate to address all of the conflicts that may arise or will address such conflicts in a manner that is favorable to us.

Risks Related to our Organization and Structure
We are a holding company with no direct operations. As a result, we rely on funds received from the Operating Partnership to pay liabilities and dividends, our stockholders’ claims will be structurally subordinated to all liabilities of the Operating Partnership and our stockholders do not have any voting rights with respect to the Operating Partnership’s activities, including the issuance of additional OP Units.
We are a holding company and conduct all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. We do not have, apart from our ownership of the Operating Partnership, any independent operations. As a result, we rely on distributions from the Operating Partnership to pay any dividends we might declare on shares of our common stock.Common Stock. We also rely on distributions from the Operating Partnership to meet our debt service and other obligations, including our obligations to make distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification. The ability of subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership to make distributions to the Operating Partnership, and the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions to us in turn, will depend on their operating results and on the terms of any loans that encumber the properties owned by them. Such loans may contain lockbox arrangements, reserve requirements, financial covenants and other provisions that restrict the distribution of funds. In the event of a default under these loans, the defaulting subsidiary would be prohibited from distributing cash. As a result, a default under any of these loans by the borrower subsidiaries could cause us to have insufficient cash to make distributions on our common stockCommon Stock required to maintain our REIT qualification.
In addition, because we are a holding company, stockholders’ claims will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations (whether or not for borrowed money) of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, claims of our stockholders will be satisfied only after all of our and the Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned approximately 97.6%99.9% of the OP Units in the Operating Partnership. However, the Operating Partnership may issue additional OP Units in the future. Such issuances could reduce our ownership percentage in the Operating Partnership. Because our stockholders would not directly own any such OP Units, they would not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership-level activities of the Operating Partnership.

Our charter and bylaws and Maryland law, as well as certain provisions in the LPA, contain provisions that may delay or prevent a change of control transaction.
Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, limits any person to actual or constructive ownership of no more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock and not more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of our shares of stock. In addition, our charter provides that we may not consolidate, merge, sell all or substantially all of our assets or engage in a share exchange unless such actions are approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Board of Directors. The ownership limits and the other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock and the Board approval requirements contained in our charter may delay or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stockCommon Stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Certain provisions in the LPA may delay, defer or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us.
CertainFurther, certain provisions in the LPA may delay or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions of us or changes in our control. These provisions could discourage third parties from making such proposals, although some stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable. These provisions include, among others:
others, redemption rights of qualifying parties;
the ability of the General Partner in some cases to amend the LPA without the consent of the limited partners;
the right of the limited partners to

consent to transfers of the general partnership interest of the General Partner and mergers or consolidations of the Company under specified limited circumstances; and
restrictions relating to our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.
The LPA also contains other provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stockCommon Stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Tax protection provisions on certain properties could limit our operating flexibility.
We have agreed with ARC Real Estate Partners, LLC, an affiliate of ARC Properties Advisors, LLC (the “Former Manager”), to indemnify it against any adverse tax consequences if we were to sell, convey, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or any portion of the interests in the properties that were acquired by us in our formation transactions, in a taxable transaction. These tax protection provisions apply until September 6, 2021, which is the 10th anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering (“IPO”). Although it may be in our stockholders’ best interest that we sell one or more of these properties, it may be economically disadvantageous for us to do so because of these obligations. We have also agreed to make debt available for ARC Real Estate Partners, LLC to guarantee. We agreed to these provisions at the time of our IPO in order to assist ARC Real Estate Partners, LLC in preserving its tax position after its contribution of its interests in our initial properties. As a result, we may be required to incur and maintain more debt than we would otherwise.
The Company’s fiduciary duties as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership could create conflicts of interest.
The Company has fiduciary duties to the Operating Partnership and the limited partners in the Operating Partnership, the discharge of which may conflict with the interests of its stockholders. The LPA provides that, in the event of a conflict between the duties owed by the Company’s directors to the Company and the duties that the Company owes in its capacity as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership to the Operating Partnership’s limited partners, the Company’s directors are under no obligation to give priority to the interests of such limited partners. As a holder of OP Units, the Company will have the right to vote on certain amendments to the LPA (which require approval by a majority in interest of the limited partners, including the Company) and individually to approve certain amendments that would adversely affect the rights of the Operating Partnership’s limited partners, as well as the right to vote on mergers and consolidations of the Company in its capacity as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership in certain limited circumstances. These voting rights may be exercised in a manner that conflicts with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. For example, the Company cannot adversely affect the limited partners’ rights to receive distributions, as set forth in the LPA, without their consent, even though modifying such rights might be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders generally.
The Board of Directors may change significant corporate policies without stockholder approval.
Our investment, financing, borrowing and dividend policies and our policies with respect to other activities, including growth, debt, capitalization, operations and operations,other governance matters, will be determined by the Board of Directors.Board. These policies may be amended or revised at any time and from time to time at the discretion of the Board of Directors without a vote of our stockholders. In addition, the Board of Directors may change our policies with respect to conflicts of interest provided that such changes are consistent with applicable legal requirements. A change in these policies could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity

and results of operations and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited under Maryland law.
Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (1) actual receipt of an improper personal benefit or profit in money, property or services or (2) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our charter contains such a provision and limits the liability of our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Maryland law requires us to indemnify our directors and officers for liability actually incurred in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party, except to the extent that the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was either committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services, or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, our charter obligates us to advance the reasonable defense costs incurred by our directors and officers. Finally, we have entered into agreements with our directors and officers pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
U.S. Federal Income and Other Tax Risks
Our failure to remain qualified as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and potentially state and local tax, and would adversely affect our operations and the market price of our capital stock.
We elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and believe we have operated, and intend to operate, in a manner that has allowed us to qualify as a REIT and will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, we may terminate our REIT qualification if the Board of Directors determines that not qualifying as a REIT is in our best interests, or the qualification may be terminated inadvertently. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. We structured our activities in a manner designed to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT. However, the REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and interpretation of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT is limited.

Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we have been or will be successful in qualifyingcontinuing to be taxed as a REIT. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends on our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the annual income and quarterly asset requirements also depends on our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), such recharacterization would jeopardize our ability to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT. Furthermore, future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could result in our disqualification as a REIT for past or future periods.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT qualification. Losing our REIT qualification would reduce our net earnings because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions and, accordingly, distributions the Operating Partnership makes to its unitholders could be similarly reduced. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.

Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, in certain circumstances, we may incur tax liabilities that would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders.
Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties that are considered held for sale and not for investment (a “prohibited transaction” under the Internal Revenue Code) will be subject to a 100% tax.tax (which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be favorable). In addition, we may not make sufficient distributions to avoid income and excise taxes on retained income. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property or other assets and pay U.S. federal income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated for federal income tax purposes as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We may, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax (which could be significant in amount) in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Internal Revenue Code to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs.TRS. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS of the REIT. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. We may use TRSs generally to hold properties for sale in the ordinary course of business or to hold assets or conduct activities that we cannot conduct directly as a REIT. Our TRSsTRS will be subject to applicable U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax on their taxable income. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to ensure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. These rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
Not all taxing jurisdictions recognize the favorable tax treatment afforded to REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. As such, we may be subject to regular corporate net income taxes in certain state, local or foreign taxing jurisdictions. In addition, we, the Operating Partnership, our TRSs,TRS, and/or other entities through which we conduct our business may also be subject to state, local or foreign income, franchise, sales, transfer, excise or other taxes. Any taxes that we incur directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders. Additionally, changes in state, local or foreign tax law could reduce the cash flow from certain investments made by us and could make such investments less attractive to potential buyers when we seek to liquidate such investments.
To qualify as aComplying with REIT we must meetrequirements (including annual distribution requirements, whichrequirements) may force us to forgo or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities or. This could reduce our operating flexibility, cause us to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions. This couldconditions, delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce your overall return.
In order to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. For example, we must distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which dividends we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (a) 85% of our ordinary income, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income and (c) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. We must also meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter which generally require that at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities.

If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences.
These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on investments in real estate assets and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, possibly at unfavorable rates, or sell assets to fund these dividends or make taxable stock dividends. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our earnings while we qualify as a REIT, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.
If the Operating Partnership or certain other subsidiaries fail to qualify as a partnership or are not otherwise disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then we would cease to qualify as a REIT.
We intend to maintain the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership, for such purposes, it would be taxabletaxed as a corporation. This would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT and would cause us to be subject to a corporate-level tax on our income. Thisincome which would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the yield on your investments. In addition, if one or more of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the Operating Partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership and is otherwise not disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then itsuch partnership or limited liability company would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the Operating Partnership. Such a recharacterization of a subsidiary entity could also threaten our ability to maintain our REIT qualification.

Recent legislation substantially modifiedWe may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes including changes that modify the taxation of REITs and their shareholders increasing tax liability as well as reduce our operating flexibility and the effectsmarket price of such legislationour capital stock.
Numerous legislative, judicial and related regulatory action are uncertain.
Onadministrative changes have been made to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments in shares of our Common Stock. In particular, on December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”(“TCJA”). The TCJA makes major was signed into law which included changes to the Code, including a number of provisions of theInternal Revenue Code that affect the taxation of REITs and their stockholders. Among theother changes, made by the TCJA are permanently reducingreduced the generally applicable corporate tax rate, generally reducingreduced the tax rate applicable to individuals and other non-corporate taxpayers for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, eliminatingeliminated or modifyingmodified certain previously allowed deductions (including substantially limiting interest deductibility and, for individuals, the deduction for non-business state and local taxes), and, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, providingprovided for preferential rates of taxation through a deduction of up to 20% (subject to certain limitations) on most ordinary REIT dividends and certain trade or business income of non-corporate taxpayers. Dividends payable by REITs are generally not eligible for the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to US stockholders that are individuals, trusts or estates. This deduction provided by the TCJA mitigates but does not eliminate the difference in the effective tax rates between REIT dividends and qualified dividends. The TCJA also imposesimposed new limitations on the deduction of net operating losses and requires us to recognize income for tax purposes no later than when we take it into account on our financial statements, which may result in us having to make additional taxable distributions to our stockholders in order to comply with REIT distribution requirements or avoid taxes on retained income and gains. The effect of the significant changes made by the TCJA is highlystill uncertain, and administrative guidance will be required in order to fully evaluate the effect of many provisions. The effect of any technical corrections with respect to the TCJA could have an adverse effect on us or our stockholders. Investors shouldOur stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors regardingadvisor with respect to the implicationsimpact of the TCJArecent legislation on their investment in our capital stock.shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares.
Dividends payable byFurther, although REITs generally do not qualifyreceive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for the reduced tax rates availablea company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for some dividends.
Currently, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate applicablepurposes as a regular corporation. Additional changes to qualified dividend income payablethe tax laws are likely to U.S. stockholderscontinue to occur, and we cannot assure you that are individuals, trusts and estates is 20% (not including the net investment income tax). Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for this reduced rate. Although this doesany such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to qualify as a REIT or the taxation of REITsa stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or dividends payable by REITs,on the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments inmarket value or the stocksresale potential of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock. Pursuant to the TCJA, non-corporate recipients of dividends from a REIT (other than capital gains dividends and dividends eligible for treatment as qualified dividends) may deduct up to 20% of such REIT dividends for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026. This deduction mitigates but does not eliminate the difference in effective tax rates between REIT dividends and dividends paid by C corporations.assets.
If we were considered to have actually or constructively paid a “preferential dividend” to certain of our stockholders, our status as a REIT could be adversely affected.
For our taxable years that ended on or before December 31, 2014, and for any year in which we fail to be a “publicly offered” REIT within the meaning of Section 562 of the Internal Revenue Code, in order for our distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions could not have been “preferential dividends.” We believe we qualify as a publicly offered REIT, but there can be no assurance that we will continue to so qualify. A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within

a particular class, and in accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents. There is uncertainty as to the IRS’s position regarding whether certain arrangements that REITs have with their stockholders could give rise to the inadvertent payment of a preferential dividend. While we believe that our operations have been structured in such a manner that we will not be treated as inadvertently paying preferential dividends, there is no de minimis or reasonable cause exception with respect to preferential dividends under the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, if the IRS were to take the position that we inadvertently paid a preferential dividend prior to January 1, 2015 (or any later year in which we are not a publicly offered REIT), we may be deemed either to (a) have distributed less than 100% of our REIT taxable income and be subject to tax on the undistributed portion, or (b) have distributed less than 90% of our REIT taxable income and our status as a REIT could be terminated for the year in which such determination is made and for the four taxable years following the year of termination if we were unable to cure such failure.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or to offset certain other positions, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such TRS.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to forgo or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and stock of a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and stock of a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by certain debt securities of publicly offered REITs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
Re-characterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.
We may purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. The Internal Revenue Service could challenge our characterization of certain leases in any such sale-leaseback transactions as “true leases,” which allows us to be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that any sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and re-characterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or the “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of re-characterization. Alternatively, such a recharacterization could cause the amount of our REIT taxable income to be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year and thus lose our REIT status.
We may incur adverse tax consequences if ARCT III, CapLease, ARCT IV, Cole or CCPT failed to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
 The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the OP, the General Partner, American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. (“ARCT III”), CapLease, Inc. (“CapLease”), American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., (“ARCT IV”), Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc. (“Cole”) and Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. (“CCPT”) are subject. If any of ARCT III, CapLease, ARCT IV, Cole or CCPT failed to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time prior to such entity’s merger with us, we may inherit significant tax liabilities and could fail to qualify as a REIT.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability, reduce our operating flexibility and reduce the market price of our capital stock.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to qualify as a REIT or the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor

with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares.
Although REITs generally receive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a regular corporation. As a result, our charter provides the Board of Directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. The Board of Directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interest of our stockholders.
Non-U.S. stockholders may be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax and may be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon the disposition of our shares.
Gain recognized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale or exchange of our common stockCommon Stock generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless such stock constitutes a “U.S. real property interest” (“USRPI”) under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (the “FIRPTA”). Our common stockCommon Stock will not constitute a USRPI so long as we are a “domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.entity,A domestically-controlled qualified investment entitywhich includes a REIT if at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of such REIT’s stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. WeWhile we believe that we are a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity. However, becauseentity, our common stockCommon Stock is and will be publicly traded, and so no assuranceassurances can be given that we are or will be a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.
given. Even if we do not qualify as a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity at the time a non-U.S. stockholder sells or exchanges our common stock,Common Stock, gain arising from such a sale or exchange would not be subject to U.S. taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI if: (a) our common stockCommon Stock is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury regulations, on an established securities market, and (b) such non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually and constructively, 10% or less of our common stockCommon Stock at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale. WeWhile we anticipate that our shares will be “regularly traded” on an established securities market for the foreseeable future, although, no assurance can be given that this will be the case. We encourage you to consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences applicable to you if you are a non-U.S. stockholder.
Our property taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which would impact our cash flows.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay some state and local taxes on our properties. The real property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase substantially. If the property taxes we pay increase and if any such increase is not reimbursable under the terms of our lease, then our cash flows will be impacted, and our ability to pay expected distributions to our stockholders and unitholders could be adversely affected.
The share ownership restrictions of the Internal Revenue Code for REITs and the 9.8% share ownership limit in our charter may inhibit market activity in our shares of stock and restrict our business combination opportunities.
In order to qualify as a REIT, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, may not own, actually or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding shares of stock at any time during the last half of each taxable year, other than the first year for which a REIT election is made. Attribution rules in the Internal Revenue Code determine if any individual or entity actually or constructively owns our shares of stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our shares of stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year, other than the first year for which a REIT election is made. To help insure that we meet these tests, among other purposes, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of our shares of stock.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT while we so qualify.REIT. Unless exempted by the Board, of Directors, for so long as we qualify as a REIT, our charter prohibits, among other limitations on ownership and transfer of shares of our stock, any person from beneficially or constructively owning (applying certain attribution rules under the Internal Revenue Code) more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock and more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of our shares of stock. The Board, of Directors, in its sole discretion and upon receipt of certain representations and undertakings, may exempt a person (prospectively or retrospectively) from the ownership limits. However, the Board of Directors may not, among other limitations, grant an exemption from these ownership restrictions to any proposed transferee whose ownership, direct or indirect, in excess of the 9.8% ownership limit would result in the termination of our qualification as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions is no longer required in order for us

to continue to so qualify as a REIT. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common stockCommon Stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Our principalThe Company is the lessee for our corporate offices are located at 2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100, Phoenix, Arizona 85016. We have additional office space, including our corporate headquarters, which is located in New York, New York; Orlando, Florida; Alpharetta, Georgia; Austin, Texas, Washington, D.C.; Los Angeles, California; and Glenview, Illinois. We lease all of these offices, other than our office space in Glenview, Illinois, which was acquired in 2013. We believe these properties we own and lease are suitable for our operations for the foreseeable future.
Phoenix, Arizona. As of December 31, 2017, omitting the Excluded Property,2019, the Company owned 4,0913,858 operating properties comprising 94.489.5 million square feet of retail and commercial space located in 49 states and Puerto Rico, and Canada,of which includes properties owned through consolidated joint ventures. The rentable space at these properties99.1% was 98.8% leased with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.5 years.8.3 years, which includes the pro rata share of square feet and annualized rental income from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures and omits the square feet of one redevelopment property. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsReal Estate Portfolio Metrics for a discussion of the properties we hold for rental operations and Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for a detailed listing of such properties.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The information contained under the heading “Litigation” in Note 1410Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3. Except as set forth therein, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Effective July 31, 2015, we transferred the listing of the General Partner’s common stockCommon Stock and Series F Preferred Stock to the NYSE from NASDAQ Global Select Market. The General Partner’s common stockCommon Stock and Series F Preferred Stock trade under the trading symbols “VER” and “VERVER PRF,” respectively.
Stock Price Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on the General Partner’s common stock,Common Stock, based on the market price of the common stockCommon Stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts All Equity REITs Index (“FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the period commencing December 31, 20122014 and ending December 31, 2017.2019. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2012.2014.
chart-ea4249265b735687a93.jpg
The graph above and the accompanying text are not “soliciting material,” are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. In addition, the stock price performance in the graph above is not indicative of future stock price performance.
Stock Price and Distributions
For each quarter indicated, the following table reflects the respective high and low sales prices for the General Partner’s common stock as quoted by the NYSE, as applicable, and the dividend or distribution declared per share of common stock or OP Unit by the General Partner or the Operating Partnership, respectively, in each such period:
  First Quarter 2016 Second Quarter 2016 Third Quarter 2016 Fourth Quarter 2016 First Quarter 2017 Second Quarter 2017 Third Quarter 2017 Fourth Quarter 2017
High $8.92
 $10.14
 $11.09
 $10.35
 $9.12
 $8.94
 $8.75
 $8.57
Low $6.68
 $8.67
 $9.76
 $7.99
 $8.18
 $7.44
 $7.90
 $7.64
                 
Dividends or distributions declared on common stock or OP Units (1)
 $0.1375
 $0.1375
 $0.1375
 $0.1375
 $0.1375
 $0.1375
 $0.1375
 $0.1375

(1)The dividend that the General Partner pays on its common stock is equal to the distributions that the Operating Partnership makes on its OP Units pursuant to the terms of the LPA. However, the Operating Partnership did not make distributions in respect of a substantial portion of the outstanding OP Units held by its limited partners beginning on October 15, 2015 and continuing through January 16, 2018 when the dividend on the General Partner’s common stock was paid, as further discussed in “Note 16 - Equity” in our consolidated financial statements.

On February 21, 2018,25, 2020, the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stockCommon Stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share) for the first quarter of 20182020 to stockholders of record as of March 30, 2018,31, 2020, which will be paid on April 16, 2018.15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP Unit.
On February 25, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a monthly cash dividend to holders of the Series F Preferred Stock as of April 1, May 1, and June 1, 2020, which will be paid on April 15, May 15, and June 15, 2020, respectively. The dividend for the Series F Preferred Stock accrues daily on a 360-day annual basis equal to an annualized dividend rate of $1.675 per share, or $0.1395833 per 30-day month.
Our future distributions may vary and will be determined by the General Partner’s Board of Directors based upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results, estimated taxable income and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board.Board of Directors.
As of February 20, 2018,21, 2020, the General Partner had approximately 3,7003,245 registered stockholders of record of its common stock.Common Stock. This figure does not reflect the beneficial ownership of shares held in nominee name. There is no established trading market for the Operating Partnership's OP Units. As of February 20, 2018,21, 2020, there were 2914 record holders of the OP Units.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During 2019, the year ended December 31, 2017,Operating Partnership redeemed an aggregate of 37,108 Series F Preferred Units for 37,108 shares of Series F Preferred Stock. Additionally, the Company did not redeem anyGeneral Partner issued an aggregate of 130,291 shares of Common Stock in redemption of 130,291 Limited Partner OP Units for(which refers to OP Units issued to parties other than the General Partner). These shares of Series F Preferred Stock and Common Stock were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the General Partner's common stock.Securities Act, based upon factual representations received from the limited partners who received the shares of Series F Preferred Stock and Common Stock.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table shows the amount of securities remaining available for future issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017:2019:
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Securities Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

91,295,800
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders


Total

91,295,800
Plan Category 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
 
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
 
Securities Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans  (1)
(excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 5,362,030
 $7.57
 96,679,922
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
Total 5,362,030
 $7.57
 96,679,922

_______________________________________________
(1)
TheRepresents the total number of shares of common stockCommon Stock reserved for the issuance of equity incentive awards under our equity-based compensation plans. Shares available under the Equity Plan isare equal to 10.0% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stockCommon Stock (on a fully diluted basis assuming the redemption of all OP Units for shares of common stock)Common Stock) at any time.  As such, the number of shares available for issuance under the Equity Plan changes automatically with changes in the total number of outstanding shares of common stock,Common Stock, outstanding OP Units, and dilutive securities. See Note 16 –13– Equity-based Compensation to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company’s equityequity-based compensation plans.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
Period 
Total Number of Shares/ Units Redeemed (1)
 Redemption Price Per Share/Unit
October 1, 2019 - October 31, 2019 
 $
November 1, 2019 - November 30, 2019 
 
December 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 8,000,000
 25.00
Total 8,000,000
 $25.00

(1)During the three months ended December 31, 2019, the Company redeemed an aggregate of 8.0 million shares of its Series F Preferred Stock.

We are authorized to repurchase shares of the General Partner’s common stockCommon Stock to satisfy employee withholding tax obligations related to stock-based compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the General Partner and the Operating Partnershipfourth quarter of 2019, there were no repurchased the following shares of common stock andCommon Stock or corresponding OP Units that were issued to the General Partner, respectively,made in order to satisfy the minimum tax withholding obligation for state and federal payroll taxes onas all employee stock awards:restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”) had previously vested during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Period Total Number of Shares/ Units Purchased Weighted Average Price Paid Per Share/Unit Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 
October 1, 2017 - October 31, 2017 26,462
 8.41
(1) 

 
 
November 1, 2017 - November 30, 2017 413
 8.07
(1) 

 
 
December 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 6,752
 7.79
(1) 

 
 
Total 33,627
 $8.28
 

$
 

(1)With respect to these shares/units, the price paid per share/unit is based on the weighted average closing price on the respective vesting date.


There were also no share repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program or 2019 Share Repurchase Program during the fourth quarter of 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $200.0 million available for share repurchases under the 2019 Share Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 0.8 million shares of Common Stock in multiple open market transactions, at a weighted average share price of $6.95 for an aggregate purchase price of $5.6 million under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program. See Note 13– Equity-based Compensation for further discussion of the share repurchase programs.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and “ItemItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current presentation, as discussed in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”Policies to our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) presented below was derived from our consolidated financial statements:
  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 
2014 (1)
 
2013 (1)
Balance sheet data:          
Total real estate investments, at cost $15,615,375
 $15,584,442
 $16,784,721
 $18,292,560
 $7,459,142
Total assets $14,705,578
 $15,587,574
 $17,405,866
 $20,427,136
 $7,747,494
Total debt, net $6,073,444
 $6,367,248
 $8,059,802
 $10,425,778
 $4,286,619
Total liabilities $6,662,702
 $6,968,041
 $8,691,907
 $11,044,806
 $5,248,967
Temporary equity $
 $
 $
 $
 $269,299
Total equity $8,042,876
 $8,619,533
 $8,713,959
 $9,382,330
 $2,229,228
           
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 
2014 (1)
 
2013 (1)
Operating data:          
Total revenues $1,252,285
 $1,335,447
 $1,441,135
 $1,375,699
 $329,323
Impairments 50,548
 182,820
 91,755
 100,547
 3,346
Total other operating expenses 945,484
 963,598
 1,059,590
 1,315,951
 659,721
Operating income (loss) 256,253
 189,029
 289,790
 (40,799) (333,744)
Total other expenses, net (259,412) (304,304) (351,882) (398,947) (171,876)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 61,536
 45,524
 (72,311) (277,031) 
Provision for income taxes (6,882) (7,136) (4,589) (7,313) (2,195)
Income (loss) from continuing operations 51,495
 (76,887) (138,992) (724,090) (507,815)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (19,117) (123,937) (184,500) (286,822) 
Net income (loss) 32,378
 (200,824) (323,492) (1,010,912) (507,815)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests(2)
 (560) 4,961
 7,139
 33,727
 16,316
Net income (loss) attributable to General Partner $31,818
 $(195,863) $(316,353) $(977,185) $(491,499)
           
Cash flow data:          
Net cash flows provided by operating activities $793,267
 $797,948
 $859,695
 $502,887
 $11,918
Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities $(274,106) $881,637
 $941,417
 $(2,527,726) $(4,541,718)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities $(756,595) $(1,506,985) $(2,151,604) $2,415,555
 $4,295,604
           
Per share data:          
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23) $(1.01) $(2.41)
Basic and diluted net loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders (0.02) (0.13) (0.20) (0.35) 
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43) $(1.36) $(2.41)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding - basic (3)
 974,098,652
 931,422,844
 903,360,763
 793,150,098
 205,341,431
Cash dividends declared per common share $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.28
 $1.08
 $0.91
  December 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Balance sheet data:          
Total real estate investments, at cost $14,843,870
 $15,604,839
 $15,615,375
 $15,584,442
 $16,784,721
Total assets $13,280,680
 $13,963,493
 $14,705,578
 $15,587,574
 $17,405,866
Total debt, net $5,705,725
 $6,087,922
 $6,073,444
 $6,367,248
 $8,059,802
Total liabilities $6,437,402
 $6,663,349
 $6,662,702
 $6,968,041
 $8,691,907
Total equity $6,843,278
 $7,300,144
 $8,042,876
 $8,619,533
 $8,713,959
           
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Operating data:          
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
 $1,335,447
 $1,441,135
Litigation and non-routine costs, net (1)
 (815,422)
(290,963)
(47,960)
(3,884)
(33,628)
Impairments (47,091)
(54,647)
(50,548)
(182,820)
(91,755)
Total other operating expenses (689,317)
(834,644)
(897,524)
(959,714)
(1,025,962)
Total gain (loss) on dispositions and assets held for sale 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
 45,524
 (72,311)
Interest and other expenses, net (280,895) (258,568) (259,412) (304,304) (351,882)
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882) (7,136) (4,589)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106)
(91,725) 51,495
 (76,887)
(138,992)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (2)
 
 3,695
 (19,117) (123,937) (184,500)
Net (loss) income (307,106)
(88,030) 32,378
 (200,824) (323,492)
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (3)
 6,753
 2,256
 (560) 4,961
 7,139
Net (loss) income attributable to General Partner $(300,353)
$(85,774) $31,818
 $(195,863) $(316,353)
           
Cash flow data:          
Net cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities $(107,603) $493,914
 $793,267
 $797,948
 $859,695
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $613,218
 $151,119
 $(274,106) $881,637
 $941,417
Net cash flows used in financing activities $(525,398) $(655,406) $(756,595) $(1,506,985) $(2,151,604)
           
Per share data:          
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders 
 0.00
 (0.02) (0.13) (0.20)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (4)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43)
Weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding - basic and diluted (5)
 998,139,969
 969,092,268
 974,098,652
 931,422,844
 903,360,763
Cash dividends declared per common share $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.28

_______________________________________________
(1)The Company’sCompany's operations were impacted by significant mergers with real estate businesses during these periods.litigation and investigations prompted by the results of the Audit Committee Investigation beginning in 2014 through 2019.
(2)On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment is reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations.
(3)Represents incomeloss or lossincome attributable to limited partners and consolidated joint venture partners.
(3)(4)Amounts may not total due to rounding.
(5)For all periods presented, the effect of certain unvested Restricted Shares or unvested restricted stock units (“Restricted Stock Units”), stock options (“Stock Options”) and OP Units outstanding long-term incentive plan units of the Operating Partnership (“LTIP Units”), unvested restricted shares or units and convertible preferred shares were excluded from the weighted-average share calculation as the effect would be anti-dilutive.antidilutive. During the year ended December 31, 2019, all Restricted Shares vested.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this report entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.” Certain risks may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section in this report entitled “Risk Factors.
Overview
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. The Company has 4,0913,858 retail, restaurant, office and industrial operating properties with an aggregate 94.489.5 million rentable square feet, of which 98.8%99.1% was leased as of December 31, 2017,2019, with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 9.58.3 years.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, we operated through two business segments, our real estate investment segment and our investment management segment, Cole Capital, which sponsored and managed non-listed real estate investment trusts. On November 13, 2017, we entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented. See Note 5 —Discontinued Operations, for further information on the sale of Cole Capital.
Effective January 1, 2017, we determined that adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”), a non-GAAP measure, and our real estate portfolio and economic metrics, should exclude the impact of properties owned by the Company for the month beginning with the date that (i) the properties’ related mortgage loan is in default and (ii) management decides to transfer the properties to the lender in connection with settling the mortgage note obligation, and ending with the disposition date ("Excluded Properties"), to better reflect our ongoing operations. Excluded Properties during the year ended December 31, 2017, were two vacant office properties and five industrial properties, two of which were vacant. Excluded Properties at December 31, 2017, included one vacant industrial property, comprised of 307,275 square feet, which secured a mortgage note payable, with debt outstanding of $16.2 million. The Company did not update data presented for prior periods for this change as it determined the impact on our prior periods was immaterial.
Our Business Environment and Current Outlook
Current conditions in the global capital markets remain volatile as the world’s economic growth has been affected by geopolitical and economic events. In the United States, the overall economic environment continued to improve in 2017. During 2017, the U.S. real gross domestic product increased 2.3%, the unemployment rate decreased 0.6 percentage points to 4.1%, and Core CPI, a measure of inflation which removes food & energy prices and is seasonally adjusted, increased 1.8%, as compared to the same period a year earlier.
Economic trends and government policies affect global and regional commercial real estate markets as well as our operations directly. These include: overall economic activity and employment growth, interest rate levels, the cost and availability of credit and the impact of tax and regulatory policies.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management believes that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner and in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to the various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different assumptions or estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. We believe the following critical accounting policies govern the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements, which should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies and procedures included in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”Policies to our consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment
In connection with prior mergers, we recorded goodwill as a result of the merger consideration exceeding the net assets acquired. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Others (Topic 350): Simplifyinghave the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which simplifiesoption to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the measurement ofquantitative goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 fromtest. As part of the goodwill impairment test (comparingannual qualitative assessment performed during the impliedfourth quarter of each year, we evaluate relevant events and circumstances that affect the fair value of goodwill with theor carrying amount of goodwill). The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to goodwill impairment include,value including, but are not limited to, the following:
Macroeconomic conditions such as a deterioration in general economic conditions, limitations on accessing capital, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, or other developments in equity and credit markets.
Industry and market considerations such as a deterioration in the environment in which an entity operates, an increased competitive environment, a decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics (considered in both absolute terms and relative to peers), a change in the market for an entity’s products or services, or a regulatory or political development.
Cost factors such as increases in raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows.
Overall financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows or a decline in actual or planned revenue or earnings compared with actual and projected results of relevant prior periods.
Other relevant entity-specific events such as changes in management, key personnel, strategy, or customers; contemplation of bankruptcy; or litigation.
Events affecting a reporting unit such as a change in the composition or carrying amount of its net assets, a more-likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing all, or a portion, of a reporting unit, the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, or recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit.
Sustained decrease in share price (both in absolute terms and relative to peers).

We estimateperformed the annual qualitative assessment for goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2019. As a result of the qualitative analysis, we believe that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value using discounted cash flows and relevant competitor multiples.
We monitor factors that may impactis greater than the fair value including market comparable company multiples, interest rates and global economic conditions.
We use a combined income and market approach in evaluations for potential impairment, which requires management to make key assumptions related to revenue growth rate, cash flow assumptions, discount rate and selection of comparable companies.
See “Note 9 – Fair Value Measuresfor discussion regarding our sensitivity analysis performed around these assumptions.carrying value. As such, no further testing was performed.
Real Estate Investment Impairment
We invest in real estate assets and subsequently monitor those investments quarterly for impairment, including the review of real estate properties subject to direct financing leases. Additionally, we record depreciation and amortization related to our investments. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to real estate investments include, but are not limited to, the following:
The estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets affect the amount of depreciation and amortization recognized on our investments.
The review of impairment indicators and subsequent determination of the undiscounted future cash flows could require us to reduce the value of assets and recognize an impairment loss.
The fair value of held for sale assets is estimated by management. This estimated value could result in a reduction of the carrying value of the asset.
The evaluation of real estate assets for potential impairment requires our management to exercise significant judgment and make certain key assumptions. There are inherent uncertainties in making these estimates such as market conditions and performance and sustainability of our tenants.
Changes in assumptions based on actual resultsrelated to management’s intent to sell or lease the real estate assets used to develop the forecasted cash flows may have a material impact on the Company’sour financial results.
Loans Held for Investment Impairment
We evaluate loans held for investment on a quarterly basis. As a first step in the notes receivable impairment process, we must determine, based on current information and events, if it is probable that we will be unable to collect the amounts due in accordance with the loan agreement. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to notes receivable include, but are not limited to, the following:
Evaluating the financial condition and other current obligations of the borrower involves judgment in assessing their liquidity and financial stability.
Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
In connection with our acquisition of properties, we allocate the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities acquired based on their respective estimated fair values. Tangible assets consist of land, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements. Intangible assets consist of above- and below- market lease values and the value of in-place leases. Our purchase price allocations are developed utilizing third-party appraisal reports, industry standards and management experience. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to purchase price allocations include, but are not limited to, the following:
The value allocated to land as opposed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements affects the amount of depreciation expense we record. If more value is attributed to land, depreciation expense is lower than if more value is attributed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements;improvements.
Intangible lease assets and liabilities can be significantly affected by estimates, including market rent, lease term including renewal options at rental rates below estimated market rental rates, carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, and current market conditions and costs, including tenant improvement allowances and rent concessions; andconcessions.
We determine whether any financing assumed is above- or below- market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar investment properties.

Income Taxes
As a REIT, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its shareholders as long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains), with the exception of its TRS entities. However, the General Partner, including its TRS entities, and the Operating Partnership are still subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate.
We provide for income taxes in accordance with current authoritative accounting and tax guidance. The tax provision or benefit related to significant or unusual items is recognized in the quarter in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the quarter in which the change occurs. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to income taxes include, but are not limited to, the following:
Our calculations related to income taxes contain uncertainties due to judgment used to calculate tax liabilities in the application of complex tax laws and regulations across the tax jurisdictions where we operate;
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Canadian federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions, and are subject to routine examinations by the respective tax authorities. We may be challenged upon review by the applicable taxing authorities, and positions we have taken may not be sustained; and
The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for or benefit from income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently issued accounting pronouncements are described in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesto our consolidated financial statements.

Operating Highlights and Key Performance Indicators
20172019 Activity
Operations
Acquired controlling financial interests in 8866 commercial properties and three land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8$403.6 million, which includes $3.3$2.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized and 22 properties acquired in a nonmonetary exchange.capitalized.
Disposed of 137201 properties, including the sale of six consolidated properties relinquished byto the Industrial Partnership and one property sold through a foreclosure, or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions, for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9$1.2 billion, of which the Company’s share was $1.1 billion, resulting in proceeds of $1.1 billion after closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $293.9 million related to the sales.
Entered into agreements to settle outstanding litigation and reached an agreement on the material terms of a negotiated resolution relating to the SEC’s investigation pertaining to the findings of the Audit Committee Investigation, among other things.
Recorded $10.5 million of which our share was $574.4 million, resultingrestructuring expenses related to reorganization of business related to the termination of the Services Agreement in consolidated proceeds2019 and the sale of $445.5 million after a mortgage loan assumption and closing costs, including 15 properties disposed ofthe Company’s investment management segment, Cole Capital, in connection with a nonmonetary exchange.2018.
Debt
Total secured debt decreased by$579.9 million,Reduced the capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility from $2.7$2.0 billion to $2.1$1.5 billion.
Closed 2017 Bond Offering of $600.0Entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million and repaid all ofnotional amount to hedge interest rate volatility. 
Due to an improvement in the outstanding borrowings under our $500.0Company’s credit rating during the fourth quarter, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and the interest rate spread on the Revolving Credit Facility was reduced by 20 bps to LIBOR + 1.00%.
Entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million. The swaps are structured to hedge our interest rate risk associated with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt.
The Company’s 2019 Senior Notes matured and the principal outstanding balance of $750.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, was repaid utilizing borrowings under the Credit Facility Term Loan.
The Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 2029 Senior Notes.
The Company’s 2021 Senior Notes consisting of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount were redeemed, and the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon was repaid.
Repurchased $80.7 million of the 2020 Convertible Notes.
Total secured debt decreased by$388.1 million, from $1.9 billion to $1.5 billion.
Equity
Completed a public equity offering of 94.3 million shares of Common Stock for net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses, of $886.9 million.
Aggregate shares issued under the continuous equity offering programs totaled 14.1 million at a weighted average price per share of $9.18, for gross proceeds of $129.1 million.
Redeemed a total of 12.0 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock, representing approximately 28.02% of the issued and outstanding preferred shares as of the beginning of the year. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock were redeemed at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.
Declared a quarterly dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stockCommon Stock for each quarter of 2017,2019, representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share.
Entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of Cole Capital.

Real Estate Portfolio Metrics
In managing our portfolio, we are committed to diversification by property type, tenant, geography and industry. Below is a summary of our operating property type diversification and our top ten concentrations as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on annualized rental income of $1.2 billion,$1.1 billion.
chart-0356ad74ac97570c9a3.jpg
(1)Includes redevelopment property, billboards, land and parking lots.

chart-203df362b4c2508aa39.jpgchart-b7f853046ceb5a6bb7d.jpg
chart-4b4e1edd564351448dd.jpgchart-f8ec4ff031d05816bc5.jpg

Our financial performance is influenced by the timing of acquisitions and dispositions and the operating performance of our real estateoperating properties. The following table shows the property statistics of our operating properties excluding properties owned through our unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015:2018:
 
2017 (1)
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Portfolio Metrics  
Operating properties 4,091 4,142 4,435 3,858 3,994
Rentable square feet (in millions)(1) 94.4 93.3 99.6 89.5 95.0
Economic occupancy rate (2)
 98.8% 98.3% 98.6%
Investment-grade tenants (3)
 39.6% 41.2% 42.5%
Economic occupancy rate (1)(2)
 99.1% 98.8%
Investment-grade tenants (1)(3)
 38.6% 41.9%

(1)OmitsAs of December 31, 2019, rentable square feet, economic occupancy rate and annualized rental income include the impact, if any,Company’s pro rata share of square feet and annualized rental income from the Excluded Properties.Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures. As of December 31, 2019, rentable square feet and economic occupancy rate exclude one redevelopment property.
(2)Economic occupancy rate equals the sum of square feet leased (including space subject to month-to-month agreements) divided by totalrentable square feet.
(3)Based on annualized rental income of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Investment-grade tenants are those with a credit rating of BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or a credit rating of Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. The ratings may reflect those assigned by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. to the lease guarantor or the parent company, as applicable.
The following table shows the economic metrics of our operating properties excluding properties owned through our unconsolidated joint ventures, as of December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015:2018:
 
2017 (1)
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Economic Metrics  
Weighted-average lease term (in years) (2)(1)
 9.5 9.9 10.6 8.3 8.9
Lease rollover (2)(3):
 
Lease rollover: (1)(2)
 
Annual average 4.8% 4.3% 3.8% 6.9% 5.5%
Maximum for a single year 7.3% 7.4% 4.5% 10.9% 7.2%

(1)Omits the impact, if any, of the Excluded Properties.
(2)Based on annualized rental income of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2017.2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, includes the Company’s pro rata share of annualized rental income from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures.
(3)(2)Through the end of the next five years as of the respective reporting date.

Operating Performance
In addition, management uses the following financial metrics to assess our operating performance (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts). Data presented includes both continuing operations, which primarily represent the Company's real estate operations, and discontinued operations, which represent substantially all of Cole Capital, except as otherwise indicated.
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018
Financial Metrics          
Revenues (1)

$1,252,285
 $1,335,447
 $1,441,135
Operating income (1)

$256,253
 $189,029
 $289,790
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$51,495
 $(76,887) $(138,992)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes $(19,117) $(123,937) $(184,500)
Rental revenue (1)

$1,237,234
 $1,257,867
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$(307,106) $(91,725)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes $
 $3,695
          
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders per diluted share (2)
 $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders per diluted share (2)
 (0.02) (0.13) (0.20)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per diluted share (2)
 $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43)
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders 
 0.00
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16)
          
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from continuing operations (3)
 $672,225
 $737,353
 $769,666
 $(138,372) $434,371
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from discontinued operations (3)
 (19,117) (123,937) (184,500) 
 3,695
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners (3)

$653,108
 $613,416
 $585,166

$(138,372) $438,066
          
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from continuing operations (3)
 $702,556
 $723,354
 $770,567
 $706,935
 $710,688
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from discontinued operations (3)
 36,213
 18,103
 11,491
 
 3,202
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners (3)

$738,769
 $741,457
 $782,058

$706,935
 $713,890
          
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from continuing operations per diluted share (3)
 $0.70
 $0.76
 $0.83
 $0.69
 $0.72
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners from discontinued operations per diluted share (3)
 0.04
 0.02
 0.01
 
 0.00
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners per diluted share (3)
 $0.74
 $0.78
 $0.84
 $0.69
 $0.72

(1)Represents continuing operations as presented on the statementstatements of operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(2)
Amounts may not total due to rounding. See “Note 18Note 16Net Income (Loss) Per Share/Unit”Unit for calculation of net (loss) income (loss) per share.
(3)
See the Non-GAAP Measures section below for descriptions of our non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure.



Property Financing
Our mortgage notes payable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Encumbered Properties Outstanding Loan Amount 
Weighted Average
Effective Interest Rate
(1)(2)
 
Weighted Average Maturity (3)
December 31, 2017 (4)
 471
 $2,054,838
 4.88% 4.1
December 31, 2016 619
 $2,629,949
 4.95% 4.6
December 31, 2015 654
 $3,039,882
 5.08% 5.1
  Encumbered Properties Outstanding Loan Amount 
Weighted Average
Effective Interest Rate
(1)(2)
 
Weighted Average Maturity (3)
December 31, 2019 (4)
 355
 $1,529,057
 5.05% 2.8
December 31, 2018 459
 $1,917,132
 4.93% 3.4

(1)Mortgage notes payable have fixed rates or are fixed by way of interest rate swap arrangements. Effective interest rates ranged from 2.8% to 6.0% at December 31, 2019, 3.1% to 6.1% at December 31, 2018, and 3.1% to 7.2% at December 31, 2017, 2.00% to 7.75% at December 31, 2016, and 3.10% to 10.68% at December 31, 2015.2017.
(2)Weighted average effective interest rate is computed using the interest rate in effect until the anticipated repayment date. Should the loan not be repaid at the anticipated repayment date, the applicable interest rate would increase as specified in the respective loan agreement until the extended maturity date.
(3)Weighted average years remaining to maturity is computed using the anticipated repayment date as specified in each loan agreement, where applicable.
(4)Omits mortgage notes associated with unconsolidated joint ventures of $269.3 million, which is non-recourse to the Excluded Property and the related outstanding loan amount of $16.2 million andCompany. The mortgage notes have a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 9.48%.3.57% and mature on June 6, 2024.

In addition, we have financing which is not secured by interests in real property, which is described under Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Future Lease Expirations
The following is a summary of lease expirations for the next 10 years and beyond at the operating properties we owned as of December 31, 20172019 (dollar amounts and square feet in thousands):
Year of Expiration 
Number of Leases
Expiring
(1)
 Square Feet Square Feet as a % of Total Portfolio Annualized Rental Income Expiring Annualized Rental Income Expiring as a % of Total Portfolio 
Number of Leases
Expiring
(1)
 Square Feet Square Feet as a % of Total Portfolio Annualized Rental Income Expiring Annualized Rental Income Expiring as a % of Total Portfolio
2018 150
 2,173
 2.3% $26,924
 2.3%
2019 171
 2,769
 2.9% 45,237
 3.9%
2020 218
 3,935
 4.2% 42,621
 3.7% 154
 2,982
 3.4% $33,486
 3.0%
2021 188
 10,523
 11.1% 84,081
 7.3% 179
 8,510
 9.6% 78,469
 7.1%
2022 287
 9,380
 9.9% 80,416
 7.0% 243
 8,015
 9.0% 74,995
 6.7%
2023 247
 6,036
 6.4% 75,240
 6.5% 288
 6,202
 6.8% 76,927
 6.9%
2024 174
 9,060
 9.6% 105,547
 9.1% 254
 10,013
 11.3% 120,825
 10.9%
2025 266
 4,197
 4.4% 60,209
 5.2% 241
 4,569
 5.0% 60,565
 5.4%
2026 248
 8,779
 9.3% 84,535
 7.3% 223
 7,970
 8.9% 76,442
 6.9%
2027 367
 7,661
 8.1% 103,552
 9.0% 350
 6,983
 7.9% 98,175
 8.8%
2028 307
 5,902
 6.6% 70,492
 6.3%
2029 140
 5,440
 6.1% 53,488
 4.8%
Thereafter 1,009
 28,812
 30.6% 446,194
 38.7% 683
 22,125
 24.5% 368,355
 33.2%
Total 3,325
 93,325
 98.8% $1,154,556
 100.0% 3,062
 88,711
 99.1% $1,112,219
 100.0%

(1)The Company has certain leases comprised of multiple properties.

Results of Operations
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017,On February 1, 2018, the Company operated through two business segments,completed the real estate investment segment and thesale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital, segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segmentwhich is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented. The Company'sCompany’s continuing operations represent primarily those of the real estate investment segment. Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 21, 2019, for a discussion of 2017 items and a comparison of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Rental IncomeRevenue
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, rental incomerevenue information and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Rental income $1,154,147
 $1,229,992
 $1,342,507
 $(75,845) $(112,515)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2019 vs 2018
Increase/(Decrease)
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $(20,633)

2017 vs 2016 The decrease in rental incomerevenue of $75.8$20.6 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016same period in 2018 was primarily due to the disposition of 438 consolidated properties subsequentreal estate dispositions, partially offset by real estate acquisitions. Subsequent to January 1, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – Rental revenue decreased $112.52018, the Company acquired 118 occupied properties for an aggregate purchase price of $904.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016,and disposed of which $105.6 million was due to the disposition of 529351 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2015. The decrease was also due tofor an increase in tenant vacancies, particularly Ovation Brands, Inc., which filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 7, 2016 (the “Ovation Bankruptcy”).aggregate sales price of $1.6 billion.
Operating Expenses
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, certain operating expense information and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
 2019 2018 2019 vs 2018
Increase/(Decrease)
Acquisition-related $3,402
 $1,321
 $6,243
 $2,081
 $(4,922) $4,337
 $3,632
 $705
Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries 47,960
 3,884
 33,628
 44,076
 (29,744)
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 $524,459
Property operating 128,717
 144,428
 130,855
 (15,711) 13,573
 129,769
 126,461
 $3,308
General and administrative 58,603
 51,927
 67,137
 6,676
 (15,210) 62,711
 63,933
 $(1,222)
Depreciation and amortization 706,802
 762,038
 821,727
 (55,236) (59,689) 481,995
 640,618
 $(158,623)
Impairments 50,548

182,820
 91,755
 (132,272) 91,065
 47,091
 54,647
 $(7,556)
Restructuring 10,505
 
 $10,505
Total operating expenses $996,032
 $1,146,418
 $1,151,345
 $(150,386) $(4,927) $1,551,830
 $1,180,254
 $371,576
Acquisition-Related Expenses
Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 as discussed in “Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements, acquisition-relatedAcquisition-related expenses consist primarily of allocated internal salaries allocatedrelated to acquisition-related activitiestime spent on acquiring commercial properties and costs incurred for deals that were not consummated.associated with unconsummated deals.
2017 vs 2016 - The increase of $2.1Litigation and non-routine costs, net
Litigation and non-routine costs, net increased $524.5 million in acquisition-related expenses forduring the year ended December 31, 2017,2019 as compared to the same period in 20162018. The increase was primarily due to ana $587.0 million increase in allocated internal salaries resulting from time spent on acquiring commercial properties during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company resumed property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2016 and acquired 88 properties and three land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8litigation settlement costs to $820.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
2016 vs 2015 - The Company acquired an interest in eight commercial properties for a purchase price of $100.22019 as compared to $233.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared with the acquisition of 16 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $36.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in acquisition related expenses of $4.9 million during the year

ended December 31, 2016 was due to a decrease in costs incurred for deals that were not consummated and fewer properties acquired in 2016.
Litigation, Merger and Other Non-routine Costs, Net of Insurance Recoveries
2017 vs 2016 - The increase of $44.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was due2018, which related to an increaselitigation filed as a result of $25.2 million in legal fees incurred related tothe findings of the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation and investigations during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Additionally, the Company recognized $21.2Investigation. This increase was offset by $48.4 million of insurance recoveries during the year ended December 31, 2016, of which $10.5 millionreceived pursuant to a settlement and release agreement with certain insurance carriers, related to litigation resulting from prior mergers and $10.7 million related tofiled as a result of the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation and investigations. No insurance recoveries were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the litigation resulting from prior mergers.
2016 vs 2015 - The decrease of $29.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to a $20 million decrease in legal fees incurred for litigation arising from the resultsfindings of the Audit Committee Investigation and $26.5 million of other recoveries related litigationto the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units by the Former Manager and investigations. Additionally, the Company recognized insurance recoveriescertain of $21.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016its principals as compared to $11.4 milliondescribed in 2015.Note 12 – Equity.
Property Operating Expenses and Operating Expense Reimbursements
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, the property operating expenses, net of operating expense reimbursements, and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,  
  2017 2016 2015 2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Property operating expenses $128,717
 $144,428
 $130,855
 $(15,711) $13,573
Less: Operating expense reimbursements 98,138
 105,455
 98,628
 (7,317) 6,827
Property operating expenses, net of operating expense reimbursements $30,579

$38,973
 $32,227
 $(8,394) $6,746
2017 vs 2016 – Property operating expenses such as taxes, insurance, ground rent and maintenance include both reimbursable and non-reimbursable property expenses. Operating expense reimbursement revenue represents reimbursements for such costs that are reimbursable by the tenants per their respective leases. The decreaseincrease in net property operating expenses of $8.4$3.3 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 20162018 was primarily due to additional reimbursable ground rent recorded in conjunction with the dispositionadoption of vacant propertiesAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”) on January 1, 2019 and certain properties subject to double-net or modified gross leases.
2016 vs 2015 – The net increase of $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to an increase in tenant vacancies, particularly related to Ovation Brands, Inc., which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 7, 2016.reimbursable operating expenses, offset by the net impact of property dispositions and acquisitions.
General and Administrative Expenses
2017 vs 2016 – The increasedecrease in general and administrative expenses of $6.7$1.2 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 20162018 was primarily due to an increase of $6.8 million of compensationa decrease in insurance expenses and benefits, including equity based compensation.bank fees.
2016 vs 2015 – Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses of $15.2$158.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to a decrease of $8.2 million in consulting and other professional fees in 2016. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2016, accounting fees decreased $2.1 million, primarily due to the work performed during the first quarter of 2015 in connection with the restatements, and legal fees decreased $2.7 million, primarily due to costs incurred in 2015 related to strategic, tax and regulatory matters.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
2017 vs 2016 – The decrease of $55.2 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 20162018 was primarily due to furniture and fixtures that were fully depreciated during 2018, as they had reached the dispositionend of 438 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016. The Company also recorded $50.5 milliontheir useful lives, and $182.8 million of impairment charges on real estate investments during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which reduced the carrying value being depreciated and amortized.dispositions, partially offset by real estate acquisitions.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease
Impairments
Impairments of $59.7$47.1 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily related2019 relate to certain office, retail and restaurant properties that, during 2019, management identified for potential sale or determined, based on discussions with the disposition of 529 consolidated properties subsequentcurrent tenants, would not be re-leased by the tenant and the Company believes the property will not be leased to January 1, 2015. The Company also recorded $182.8 million and $91.8 million of impairment charges on real estate investments duringanother tenant at a rental rate that supports the current book value.
Restructuring Expenses
During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which reduced2019, the carrying value being depreciated and amortized.

Impairments
2017 vs 2016 – The decrease in impairmentsCompany recorded $10.5 million of $132.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as comparedrestructuring expenses related to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to a decrease inreorganization of the number of properties impaired from 153 duringbusiness after the year ended December 31, 2016 to 69 properties during the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the decrease was also due to management identifying certain properties for potential sale as part of its portfolioinvestment management strategysegment, Cole Capital, and cessation of services performed pursuant to reduce exposure to office properties during the year ended December 31, 2016 as well as the Ovation Bankruptcy during 2016.Services Agreement.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in impairments of $91.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to management identifying certain propertiesOther Income, Provision for potential sale as part of its portfolio management strategy to reduce exposure to office properties, as well as the Ovation Bankruptcy.
Other (Expense) Income Taxes and Income Tax (Provision) Benefit and Loss(Loss) from Discontinued Operations
The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, certain financial information and the dollar amount change year over year (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2017 vs 2016
Increase/(Decrease)
 2016 vs 2015
Increase/(Decrease)
Interest expense $(289,766) $(317,376) $(358,392) $(27,610) $(41,016)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 18,373
 (771) 4,812
 19,144
 (5,583)
Other income, net 6,242
 5,251
 9,366
 991
 (4,115)
Reserve for loan loss 
 
 (15,300) 
 15,300
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,763
 9,783
 9,092
 (7,020) 691
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net 2,976
 (1,191) (1,460) 4,167
 269
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 61,536
 45,524
 (72,311) 16,012
 117,835
Provision for income taxes (6,882) (7,136) (4,589) (254) 2,547
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (19,117) (123,937) (184,500) 104,820
 60,563
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2019 vs 2018
Increase/(Decrease)
Interest expense $(278,574) $(280,887) $2,313
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 $(23,270)
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 $(2,119)
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 $749
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 $198,316
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) $839
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 $(3,695)
Interest Expense
2017 vs 2016 The decrease in interest expense of $27.6$2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to 2016the same period in 2018 was primarily due to the repaymenta decrease in average debt outstanding.
(Loss) Gain on Extinguishment and Forgiveness of the Credit Facility Term LoanDebt, Net
The loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of $500.0 million and a $579.9 million reduction of secured debt, partially offset by the issuance of $600.0 million of unsecured notes and net borrowings on the revolving credit facility of $185.0 million.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease of $41.0was $17.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily2019 as compared to the gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net of $5.4 million for the same period in 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized losses on extinguishment of debt related to the redemption of $400.0 million of the 2021 Senior Notes, prepayments of mortgage notes payable, and the repurchase of $80.7 million of the 2020 Convertible Notes, offset by a resultgain on the foreclosure sale of one property. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized a gain related to one deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction with the lender of a mortgage loan, which was secured by one property.
Other Income, Net
The decrease in the total outstanding debt balance from $8.1 billion asother income, net of December 31, 2015 to $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2016, largely due to the repayment of all outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, repayment of $0.5 billion of the Credit Facility Term Loan, as well as reducing secured debt with proceeds from the public equity offering and property dispositions.
Gain (Loss) on Extinguishment and Forgiveness of Debt, Net
2017 vs 2016 – The increase of $19.1$2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily a result of three mortgage loans settled by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure for which the Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of $20.5 million, with no comparable gains resulting from foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure during the same period in 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a loss of $0.8 million in relation to the write-off of deferred financing costs and net premiums consisting of losses relating to the early extinguishment of our 2017 Senior Notes of $13.2 million and the prepayment of a portion of the Credit Facility Term Loan of $4.3 million, as well as the 2016 Term Loan of $2.6 million, as discussed in “Note 10 – Debt” to our consolidated financial statements. These losses were partially offset by a gain on forgiveness of debt of $19.1 million related to a mortgage loan settled by foreclosure. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a gain on forgiveness of debt of $4.8 million related to the foreclosure of one property.

Other Income, Net
2017 vs 2016 – The increase of $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 20162018 was primarily due to post-closing adjustments, of $1.6a $5.1 million recordedgain in accordance with2018 from measuring the purchaseCompany’s investments in Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and sale agreement duringCole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”) at fair value after the year ended December 31, 2016investments were no longer accounted for using the equity method and a $4.8 million payment received in 2018 related to a multi-tenant asset portfolio sale completedfully reserved loan receivable recorded in 2014,other income, offset by a decrease$4.2 million of payments received in interest income2019 related to the Company’s investment securitiesbankruptcy claims related to two prior tenants and mortgage notes receivable of $0.6 million.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease of $4.1a $2.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as comparedloss in 2018 related to the same period in 2015 was primarily a result of a decrease in disposition fees earned from 1031 real estate programs of $3.8 million.
Reserve for Loan Loss
The reserve for loan loss of $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to an unsecured note from RCS Capital Corporation in connection with the unconsummated sale of Cole Capital. During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company assessed the collectability of the note, determined it was unlikely to be repaid and recorded the reserve equal to the carrying value of the note.six commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Equity in Income and Gain on Disposition of Unconsolidated Entities
2017 vs 2016 The decrease of $7.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same periodincrease in 2016 was primarily the result of a gain of $10.2 million recognized on the disposition of one unconsolidated joint venture owning one property in 2016, with no comparable gain in 2017.
2016 vs 2015 – Equityequity in income (loss) and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities increasedof $0.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a gain of $10.2 million related to the disposition of one property, comprising 343 million square feet of office space, owned by an unconsolidated joint venture. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $6.7 million related to the disposition of its interest in one consolidated joint venture, whose only assets consisted of investments in three unconsolidated joint ventures that owned three properties, comprising 752 million square feet of retail space. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized $0.9 million and $2.3 million of net income, respectively, from the unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company recorded equity in loss related to its investments in the Cole REITs of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to equity in income of $0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments, Net
2017 vs 2016 – The $4.2 million increase during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 2016,2018, was primarily a result of the termination of six interest rate swaps in connection with the early repayment of the outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility Term Loan, as discussed in Note 11 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements, which resulted in a gain of $1.1 million as compared to a loss of $3.3 million in 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease during the year ended December 31, 2016, is due to the termination of two interest rate swaps in connection with the early repayment of a portion of the Credit Facility Term Loan, which resulted in a loss of $3.3 million, offset by an increaseCompany’s investment in the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps.Industrial Partnership.
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Assets Held Forfor Sale, Net
2017 vs 2016 
The increase in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, assets, net of $16.0$198.3 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 2016,2018, was due to the Company’s disposition of 131200 properties, excluding six properties transferredone property conveyed to thea lender in either a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction, for an aggregate sales price of $594.9 million$1.2 billion which resulted in a gain of $64.7$293.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, as compared to the disposaldisposition of 301148 properties, excluding one property conveyed to a lender in a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, for an aggregate sales price of $1.1 billion$526.4 million during the same period in 2016 for2018, which resulted in a gain of $50.6 million, which included $28.8 million of goodwill allocation related to the sales.$96.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company also recognized a loss of $3.1$1.3 million related to assets classified as held for sale, as compared to a loss of $5.1$1.9 million during the same period in 2016.2018.
2016 vs 2015 – During the year ended December 31, 2016, the change of $117.8 million from a net loss on dispositions of real estate to a net gain was due to the Company’s disposition of 301 properties for an aggregate sales price of $1.1 billion, which resulted in an aggregate gain of $50.6 million, as compared to the disposal of 228 properties for an aggregate sales price of $1.4 billion during the same period in 2015 for a loss of $69.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company also recorded a loss of $5.1 million related to assets classified as held for sale, as compared to a loss of $3.2 million during the same period in 2015.

Provision for Income Taxes
2017 vs 2016 The consolidated provision for income taxes of $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to a provision of $7.1 million for the same period in 2016 reflects an overall decrease in expense attributable to higher state taxes in 2016 and tax on net income from properties held in and sold by a TRS in 2016, which were partially offset by tax on the gain on the saleconsists of certain Canadian properties in 2017.state, local and federal income and franchise taxes.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase of $2.5 million is primarily due to the 2014 accrued state tax expense exceeding actual expenses incurred, resulting in a decrease to the provision for income taxes during the year ended December 31, 2015.
LossIncome (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
2017 vs 2016 – During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The decreasechange in lossincome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of $104.8income taxes of $3.7 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 2018 was primarily due to decreases in impairmentthe completion of goodwill of $120.9 million, in general and administrative expenses of $18.8 million and in amortization of intangible assets of $11.7 million, partially offset by the loss recognized on classification as held for sale of $20.0 million and an increase in the provision for income taxes of $24.7 million. Revenues, net of reallowed fees and commissions increased $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease in loss from discontinued operations of $60.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to a decrease in impairment of intangible assets and goodwill of $92.4 million, offset by a decrease in the benefit from income taxes.company’s investment management segment, Cole Capital, on February 1, 2018.

Non-GAAP Measures
Our results are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We also disclose certain non-GAAP measures, as discussed further below. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in our internal analysis of results and believes these measures are useful to investors for the reasons explained below. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as substitutes for any measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”Nareit”), an industry trade group, has promulgated a supplemental performance measure known as funds from operations (“FFO”), which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. FFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under U.S. GAAP.
NAREITNareit defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP excludingadjusted for gains or losses from disposition of property, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and impairment write-downs on depreciable real estate, including theand our pro rata share of FFO adjustments forrelated to unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We calculatedcalculate FFO in accordance with NAREIT’sNareit’s definition described above.
In addition to FFO, we use adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”) as a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure to evaluate the operating performance of the Company. AFFO, as defined by the Company, excludes from FFO non-routine items such as acquisition-related expenses, litigation merger and other non-routine costs, net, of insurance recoveries, held for sale loss on disposition of discontinued operations, net revenue or expense earned or incurred that is related to the Services Agreement, gains or losses on sale of investment securities or mortgage notes receivable, payments on fully reserved loan receivables and legal settlements and insurance recoveries not in the ordinary course of business.restructuring expenses. We also exclude certain non-cash items such as impairments of goodwill and intangible assets, straight-line rent, net of bad debt expense related to straight-line rent, net direct financing lease adjustments, gains or losses on derivatives, reserves for loan loss, gains or losses on the extinguishment or forgiveness of debt, non-current portion of the tax benefit or expense, equity-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets, deferred financing costs, premiums and discounts on debt and investments, above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities. Effective January 1, 2017, we determined toWe omit the impact of the Excluded Properties and related non-recourse mortgage notes from FFO to calculate AFFO. We did not adjust AFFO during the years prior to January 1, 2017 as the impact was immaterial. Management believes that excluding these costs from FFO provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance models and analysis used by management, and provides investors a view of the performance of our portfolio over time. AFFO allows for a comparison of the performance of our operations with other publicly-traded REITs, as AFFO, or an equivalent measure, is routinely reported by publicly-traded REITs, and we believe often used by analysts and investors for comparison purposes.
For all of these reasons, we believe FFO and AFFO, in addition to net income (loss), as defined by U.S. GAAP, are helpful supplemental performance measures and useful in understanding the various ways in which our management evaluates the performance of the Company over time. However, not all REITs calculate FFO and AFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. FFO and AFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) and are not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs. Neither the SEC, NAREIT,Nareit, nor any other regulatory body has evaluated the acceptability of the exclusions used to adjust FFO in order to calculate AFFO and its use as a non-GAAP financial performance measure.

The table below presents FFO and AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands, except share and per share data) and includes both continuing operations, which primarily represent the Company's real estate operations, and discontinued operations, which represent substantially all of Cole Capital. Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 21, 2019, for a discussion of 2017 items.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Net income (loss) $32,378
 $(200,824) $(323,492)
Dividends on non-convertible preferred stock (71,892) (71,892) (71,892)
(Gain) loss on disposition of real estate assets and interests in unconsolidated joint ventures, net (61,536) (55,722) 65,582
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets 703,133
 756,315
 817,469
Impairment of real estate 50,548
 182,820
 91,755
Proportionate share of adjustments for unconsolidated entities 477
 2,719
 5,744
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners 653,108
 613,416
 585,166
Acquisition-related expenses 3,402
 1,321
 6,243
Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries 51,762
 3,884
 33,628
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets 
 120,931
 213,339
Held for sale loss on discontinued operations 20,027
 
 
Reserve for loan loss 
 
 15,300
Legal settlements 
 
 (1,250)
Gain on early repayment of mortgage notes receivable and sale of investment securities (65) 
 (65)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net (2,976) 1,191
 1,460
Amortization of premiums and discounts on debt and investments, net (4,616) (14,693) (19,183)
Amortization of above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of amortization of below-market lease liabilities 5,366
 5,396
 4,522
Net direct financing lease adjustments 2,093
 2,264
 2,037
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs 24,536
 28,063
 33,998
Amortization of management contracts 14,514
 26,171
 25,903
Deferred and other tax expense (benefit) (1)
 8,671
 (10,136) (52,242)
(Gain) loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (18,373) 771
 (4,812)
Straight-line rent, net of bad debt expense related to straight-line rent (44,903) (54,190) (82,398)
Equity-based compensation 16,751
 10,728
 14,500
Other amortization and non-cash charges 2,566
 5,296
 3,840
Proportionate share of adjustments for unconsolidated entities 378
 1,044
 2,072
Adjustments for Excluded Properties 6,528
 
 
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners $738,769
 $741,457
 $782,058
       
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - basic 974,098,652
 931,422,844
 903,360,763
Effect of Limited Partner OP Units and dilutive securities(2)
 24,059,312
 24,626,646
 26,013,303
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding - diluted (3)
 998,157,964
 956,049,490
 929,374,066
       
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners per diluted share 
 $0.74

$0.78
 $0.84
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030)
Dividends on non-convertible preferred stock (68,488) (71,892)
Gain on disposition of real estate assets and interests in unconsolidated joint ventures, net (292,654) (95,034)
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets 480,064
 637,097
Impairment of real estate 47,091
 54,647
Proportionate share of adjustments for unconsolidated entities 2,721
 1,278
FFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners (138,372) 438,066
Acquisition-related expenses 4,337
 3,632
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,309
Loss on disposition and held for sale loss on discontinued operations 
 1,815
Payments received on fully reserved loans (133) (4,792)
Loss (gain) on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 493
 (4,092)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments, net 58
 (355)
Amortization of premiums and discounts on debt and investments, net (5,312) (3,486)
Amortization of above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of amortization of below-market lease liabilities 2,538
 4,178
Net direct financing lease adjustments 1,617
 2,023
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs 15,464
 19,166
Deferred and other tax benefit (1)
 
 (1,855)
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360)
Straight-line rent, net of bad debt expense related to straight-line rent (2)
 (28,032) (39,723)
Equity-based compensation 12,251
 12,417
Restructuring expenses 10,505
 
Other adjustments, net (773) 1,446
Proportionate share of adjustments for unconsolidated entities (1,005) 36
Adjustments for Excluded Properties (33) 465
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners $706,935

$713,890
     
Weighted-average shares of Common Stock outstanding - basic 998,139,969
 969,092,268
Effect of weighted-average Limited Partner OP Units and dilutive securities (3)
 20,094,822
 24,145,875
Weighted-average shares of Common Stock outstanding - diluted (4)
 1,018,234,791
 993,238,143
     
AFFO attributable to common stockholders and limited partners per diluted share $0.69

$0.72

(1)This adjustment represents the non-current portion of the provision for or benefit from income taxes in order to show only the current portion of the provision for or benefit from income taxes as an impact to AFFO. For the three months ended December 31, 2017, this adjustment is net of a current tax benefit due to the acceleration of a bonus compensation-related deduction to take advantage of the Company’s higher effective tax rate in 2017. As the Company already recognized the prior year bonus compensation-related tax deduction during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the acceleration of the 2018 benefit was not included in the computation of AFFO.
(2)Dilutive securities include unvested restricted sharesUpon adoption of common stockASC 842, the Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental revenue and unvested restricted stock units.does not record bad debt expense for uncollectible accounts.
(3)In connection with the Class Action Settlement, the Former Manager and Former CFO surrendered 19.9 million Limited Partner OP Units that were canceled during the three months ended December 31, 2019. Dilutive securities include unvested Restricted Shares, unvested Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options. During the year ended December 31, 2019, all Restricted Shares vested.
(4)Weighted-average shares for all periods presented exclude the effect of the convertible debt as the Company would expect to settle the debt with cash.cash and any shares underlying Restricted Stock Units that are not issuable based on the Company’s level of achievement of certain performance targets through the respective reporting period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our principal liquidity needs for the next twelve months and beyond are to:
fund normal operating expenses;
fund potential capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing costscosts;
meet debt service and principal repayment obligations, including balloon payments on maturing debt;
pay dividends;
pay litigation costs and expenses;expenses (including the cost of the SEC settlement); and
fund property and/or common stock acquisitions.
We expect to be able to satisfy these obligations using one or more of the following sources:
cash flow from operations;
proceeds from real estate dispositions;
utilization of the existing line of credit;Revolving Credit Facility;
cash and cash equivalents balance; and
issuance of VEREIT debt and equity securities.
2017 BondCommon Stock Offering
On August 11, 2017,September 26, 2019, the Company closedcompleted the Offering, selling a senior note offering, consistingtotal of $600.094.3 million aggregate principal amountshares of Common Stock, which included the full exercise of the Operating Partnership’s 3.950% Senior Notes due 2027. As discussed in Note 10 –Debt,underwriters' option to purchase additional shares, for net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses, of $886.9 million. The Company contributed the Company subsequently used a portion of thenet proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering to repay borrowings, including swap termination costs and accrued unpaid interest under its $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan on August 11, 2017. The Companythe OP in exchange for additional General Partner OP Units, which have substantially identical economic terms as the Company’s common stock. Subsequent to September 30, 2019, the net proceeds of the Offering were used the remaining proceeds to pay down secured debt.amounts owed in connection with the settlement of certain litigation, as described in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies, and for general corporate purposes.
Common Stock Continuous Equity Offering ProgramPrograms
On September 19, 2016, the Company registered a continuous equity offering program (the “Program”)the Prior Program pursuant to which the Company cancould offer and sell, from time to time, through September 19, 2019 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions, shares of common stockCommon Stock with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $750.0 million, through its sales agents. As of and during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had issued 5.0 million shares under the Prior Program, at a weighted average price per share of $8.42, for gross proceeds of $42.5 million. The weighted average price per share, net of offering costs, was $8.30, for net proceeds of $41.8 million. The proceeds from the sale of shares were used for general corporate purposes, including funding potential acquisitions and repurchasing or repaying outstanding indebtedness.
On April 15, 2019, the Company intendsestablished the Current ATM Program, a new continuous equity offering program pursuant to usewhich the Company may sell shares of Common Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $750.0 million from time to time through April 15, 2022 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions. The Current ATM Program replaced the Prior Program. The proceeds from any sale of shares under the Current ATM Program have been or will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding potential acquisitions and repurchasing or repaying outstanding indebtedness. As of and during the year ended December 31, 2017, no2019, the Company had issued 9.0 million shares under the Current ATM Program, at a weighted average price per share of common stock have been issued pursuant$9.60, for gross proceeds of $86.7 million. The weighted average price per share, net of offering costs, was $9.46, for net proceeds of $85.4 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $663.3 million available to be sold under the Current ATM Program.
Share Repurchase ProgramPrograms
On May 12, 2017,3, 2018, the Company’s boardBoard of directors authorizedDirectors terminated its 2018 Share Repurchase Program that permitted the Company to repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’sits outstanding Common Stock over the subsequent 12 months,through May 3, 2019, as market conditions warrant. Duringwarranted. On May 6, 2019, the twelve monthsCompany’s Board of Directors authorized the 2019 Share Repurchase Program that permits the Company to repurchase up to $200.0 million of its outstanding Common Stock through May 6, 2022. Under the share repurchase programs, repurchases can be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, structured or derivative transactions, including accelerated stock repurchase transactions, or other methods of acquiring shares in accordance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements. The share repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to make any repurchases at a specific time or in a specific situation and repurchases are influenced by prevailing market conditions, the trading price of the

Common Stock, the Company’s financial performance and other conditions. Shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company under the share repurchase programs, if any, will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.
There were no share repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program or 2019 Share Repurchase Program during the year ended December 31, 2017,2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $200.0 million available for share repurchases under the 2019 Share Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 68,7590.8 million shares of common stockCommon Stock in multiple open market transactions, at a weighted average share price of $6.95 for $0.5 million.an aggregate purchase price of $5.6 million under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program.
Series F Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred OP Units
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company redeemed a total of 12.0 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock, representing approximately 28.02% of the issued and outstanding preferred shares as of the beginning of the year. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock were redeemed at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.
As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 30.9 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock, approximately 30.9 million corresponding General Partner Series F Preferred Units and 49,766 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding.
Disposition Activity
As part of our effort to optimize our real estate portfolio by focusing on holding core assets, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we2019, the Company disposed of 137201 properties, andincluding the sale of six consolidated properties transferred to the lender in eitherIndustrial Partnership and one property sold through a deed-in-lieu foreclosure, or foreclosure sale transaction for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9 million,$1.2 billion, of which our share was $574.4 million,$1.1 billion, resulting in consolidated proceeds of $445.5 million$1.1 billion after mortgage loan assumptionclosing costs and closing costs.contributions to the Industrial Partnership. We expect to continue to explore opportunities to sell additional properties to provide us further financial flexibility and to fund property acquisitions.
Credit Facility
Summary and Obligations
We,On May 23, 2018, the Company, as guarantor, and the Operating Partnership, as borrower, are parties to theentered into a Credit FacilityAgreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto.

As of December 31, 2017, the Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $185.0 million and allowedthereto that allows for maximum borrowings of $2.3$2.9 billion, originally consisting of a $2.0 billion Revolving Credit Facility and a $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan. Effective December 27, 2019, the Company reduced its Revolving Credit Facility capacity from $2.0 billion to $1.5 billion. At December 31, 2019, $150.0 million was outstanding under its revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing availability.the Revolving Credit Facility and the full $900.0 million was drawn on the Credit Facility Term Loan. The maximum aggregate dollar amount of letters of credit that may be outstanding at any one time under the Credit Facility is $25.0$50.0 million. The Operating Partnership used a portionAs of the proceeds from the 2017 Bond OfferingDecember 31, 2019, letters of credit outstanding were $3.9 million. Subsequent to repayDecember 31, 2019, all letters of thecredit outstanding borrowings, including swap termination costs and accrued and unpaid interest, under its $500.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan on August 11, 2017.were terminated.
The revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility generally bears interest at an annual rate of London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”)LIBOR plus 1.00%0.775% to 1.80%1.55% or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.80%0.55% (based upon our then current credit rating). “Base Rate” is defined as the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or a floating rate based on one month LIBOR plus 1.0%, determined on a daily basis. The Credit Facility Term Loan generally bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.75%, or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.75% (based upon our then current credit rating). In addition, the Credit Agreement provides the flexibility for interest rate auctions, pursuant to which, at the Company’s election, the Company may request that lenders make competitive bids to provide revolving loans, which competitive bids may be at pricing levels that differ from the foregoing interest rates.
The Credit Agreement provides for monthly interest payments under the Credit Facility. In the event of default, at the election of a majority of the lenders (or automatically upon a bankruptcy event of default with respect to the OP or the General Partner), the commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility will mature, and payment of any unpaid amounts in respect of the Credit Facility will be accelerated. The Credit Facility terminates on June 30, 2018, unless extended in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for a one-year extension option, exercisable at the Company’s election and subject to certain customary conditions, as well as certain customary “amend and extend” provisions. At any time, upon timely notice by the OP and subject to any breakage fees, the OP may prepay borrowings under the Credit Facility (subject to certain limitations applicable to the prepayment of any loans obtained through an interest rate auction, as described above). The OP incurs a fee equal to 0.15% to 0.25% per annum (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating) multiplied by the commitments (whether or not utilized) in respect of the revolving credit facility. In addition, the OP incurs customary administrative agent, letter of credit issuance, letter of credit fronting, extension and other fees.
Credit Facility Covenants
The Credit Facility requires restrictions on corporate guarantees, as well as the maintenance of certain financial covenants. The key financial covenants in the Credit Facility, as defined and calculated per the terms of the Credit Agreement include maintaining the following:
Unsecured Credit Facility Key Covenants Required
Minimum tangible net worth≥ $5.5 B
Ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value ≤ 60%
Ratio of adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges ≥ 1.5x
Ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value ≤ 45%
Ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value ≤ 60%
Ratio of unencumbered adjusted NOI to unsecured interest expense ≥ 1.75x
Minimum unencumbered asset value≥ $8.0 B

For the purposes of determining unencumbered asset value, the Company is permitted to include restaurant properties representing up to 30% of its unencumbered asset value in such calculation.
The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the Credit Agreement and is not restricted from accessing any borrowing availability under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017.

2019.
Corporate Bonds
Summary and Obligations
On February 6, 2019, the Company’s 2019 Senior Notes matured and the principal outstanding balance of $750.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, was repaid, utilizing borrowings under the Credit Facility Term Loan.
On December 4, 2019, the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 2029 Senior Notes.
On December 20, 2019, the $400.0 million 2021 Senior Notes were redeemed, and the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon was repaid.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the OPOperating Partnership had $2.85 billion aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes outstanding. The indenture governing the Senior Notes requires that the Company be in compliance with certain key financial covenants, including maintaining the following:
Corporate Bond Key Covenants Required
Limitation on incurrence of total debt ≤ 65%
Limitation on incurrence of secured debt ≤ 40%
Debt service coverage ratio ≥ 1.5x
Maintenance of total unencumbered assets ≥ 150%
There were no changes to the financial covenants of our existing Senior Notes during the year ended December 31, 2017. The covenants of our new Senior Notes issued in 2017 are materially the same as our then existing Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company believes that it was in compliance with these financial covenants based on the covenant limits and calculations in place at that time.
Convertible Debt
Summary and Obligations
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased $80.7 million of the 2020 Convertible Notes and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had $1.0 billion$321.8 million aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Convertible Notes (as defined in Note 10 –Debt).outstanding. The OP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the General Partner. There were no changes to the terms of the 2020 Convertible Notes during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the 2020 Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Mortgage Notes Payable and Other Debt
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2017, we2019, the Company had non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of $2.1$1.5 billion, which was collateralized by 472355 properties, reflecting a decrease from December 31, 20162018 of $558.9$388.1 million derived primarily from our disposition activity during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019, primarily related to prepayments of mortgage notes payable. Our mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the weighted-average rate of 4.92%5.05% per annum and had a weighted-average maturity of 4.12.8 years. We may in the future incur additional mortgage debt on the properties we currently own or use long-term non-recourse financing to acquire additional properties.
The payment terms of our loan obligations vary. In general, only interest amounts are payable monthly with all unpaid principal and interest due at maturity. Some of our loan agreements require that we comply with specific reporting and financial covenants mainly related to debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Each loan that has these requirements has specific ratio thresholds that must be met.
Restrictions on Loan Covenants
Our mortgage loan obligations generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios), as well as the maintenance of a minimum net worth. The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. At December 31, 2017, theThe Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements except forand had no restrictions on the $16.2payment of dividends as of December 31, 2019.
Derivative Activity
As discussed in Note 6 –Debt and Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million loannotional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, to hedge interest rate volatility. Due to an improvement in default as described above and in “Note 10 –Debt” to our consolidated financial statements.
Other Debt
Duringthe Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repaidalso entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the remaining outstanding principal balancerisk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 120 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on the secured term loan from KBC Bank, N.V. (the “KBC Loan”).existing financial instruments), with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt.
Dividends
On November 7, 2017,5, 2019, the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stockCommon Stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share) for the fourth quarter of 20172019 to stockholders of record as of December 29, 2017,31, 2019, which was paid on January 16, 2018.15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP unit.Unit.

Our Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in “Note 15Note 12 – Equity”Equity to our consolidated financial statements, will pay cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis). As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 42.8 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock (and approximately 42.8 million corresponding Series F Preferred Units that were issued to the General Partner) and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units that were issued and outstanding.

Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172019 (in thousands):
 Total 
Less than
1 year
 1-3 years 4-5 years 
More than
5 years
 Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Principal payments - mortgage notes (1)
 $2,071,038
 $98,450
 $487,975
 $667,609
 $817,004
 $1,529,057
 $188,385
 $588,466
 $745,238
 $6,968
Interest payments - mortgage notes (1) (2) (3)
 421,575
 100,177
 176,655
 108,534
 36,209
Interest payments - mortgage notes (1)
 210,667
 74,251
 102,135
 33,154
 1,127
Principal payments - Credit Facility 185,000
 185,000
 
 
 
 1,050,000
 
 150,000
 900,000
 
Interest payments - Credit Facility (3)
 2,854
 2,854
 
 
 
Interest payments - Credit Facility (1) (2)
 119,683
 38,281
 72,246
 9,156
 
Principal payments - corporate bonds 2,850,000
 
 750,000
 400,000
 1,700,000
 2,850,000
 
 
 500,000
 2,350,000
Interest payments - corporate bonds 695,599
 114,950
 187,088
 158,775
 234,786
 796,198
 119,988
 239,976
 219,212
 217,022
Principal payments - convertible debt 1,000,000
 597,500
 402,500
 
 
 321,802
 321,802
 
 
 
Interest payments - convertible debt 55,067
 25,550
 29,517
 
 
 11,531
 11,531
 
 
 
Operating and ground lease commitments 308,434
 18,917
 37,565
 36,443
 215,509
 334,977
 22,287
 44,406
 42,827
 225,457
Other commitments (3)
 4,345
 4,345
 
 
 
Total $7,589,567
 $1,143,398
 $2,071,300
 $1,371,361
 $3,003,508
 $7,228,260
 $780,870
 $1,197,229
 $2,449,587
 $2,800,574

____________________________________
(1)
For the loanInterest payments due in maturity default, as discussed in Note 10 –Debt , the payment obligations for future periods are based on an estimated extensionthe $164.4 million of maturity to January 1, 2018.
variable rate debt were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.
(2)As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $78.9$900.0 million of variable rate mortgage notesdebt on the Credit Facility Term Loan effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the effective interest rates effectively fixed under our swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(3)Interest payments due in future periods onIncludes the $14.9 millionCompany’s share of variable rate debtcapital expenditures related to an expansion project of the property held within an unconsolidated joint venture and the Credit Facility payment obligationsletters of credit outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, all letters of credit outstanding were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.terminated.
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 20172019
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, net cash used in operating activities increased $601.5 million to $107.6 million from $493.9 million net cash provided by operating activities decreased $4.7 million to $793.3 million from $797.9 million during the same period in 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to a decrease in rental receipts related to the disposition of 438 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016 and an$524.5 million increase in litigation and other non-routine costs, net, including litigation settlements, paid during the year ended December 31, 2017. This decrease was mostly offset by a decrease in interest payments and insurance recoveries received as compared to the same period in 2016, the receipt of an income tax refund during the year ended December 31, 2017, and an increase in rental receipts related to the acquisition of 96 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2016.2019.
Investing Activities Net cash used inprovided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 changed $1.2 billion2019 increased $462.1 million to $274.1$613.2 million from cash provided by investing activities of $881.6$151.1 million during the same period in 2016.2018. The changeincrease was primarily related to an increase in investments in real estate assets of $598.8 million, a decrease in cash proceeds from dispositions of real estate and joint ventures of $555.2$565.2 million and a decrease in investments in real estate assets of $106.0 million, offset by a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations of $122.9 million, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of CMBS and mortgage notes receivables of $37.1 million and an increase in payments for capital expenditures and leasing costs and real estate developments of $34.6 million.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $756.6$525.4 million decreased $750.4$130.0 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 from $1.5 billion$655.4 million during the same period in 2016.2018. The decrease was primarily duerelated to a decrease in repayments of debt, net$1.0 billion of proceeds received from the issuance of $1.5 billion, which was partiallyCommon Stock in 2019, offset by the 2016 common stock offering resultingredemption of $300.1 million of Series F Preferred Stock in 2019, an increase in payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs of $236.2 million, and a decrease of $170.0 million in net proceeds after underwriting discountsrelated to the credit facilities, corporate bonds and offering costs,convertible notes. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, $192.0 million of $702.8 millionpayments were made related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units, with no comparable activity during the same period in 2018.
Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and an increaseAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in distributions paid of $28.1 million.
Cash Flow Analysisthe Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016
Operating Activities During2018, filed February 21, 2019, for the yearcash flow analysis for the years ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities decreased $61.7 million to $797.9 million from $859.7 million during the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in rental receipts related to the disposition of 529 consolidated properties subsequent to January 1, 2015. This decrease was partially offset by a decrease in interest payments2018 and payments related to the Audit Committee Investigation and related litigation, net of insurance recoveries.2017.


Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $59.8 million to $881.6 million from $941.4 million during the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily related to an increase in investments in real estate assets of $63.9 million, an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture of $25.8 million during 2016 and a decrease in uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets of $35.4 million. These decreases were partially offset by a decrease in real estate development payments of $40.3 million and the receipt of $50.0 million on the Affiliate Lines of Credit, as compared to $10.0 million in 2015.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $1.5 billion decreased $644.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 from $2.2 billion during the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the 2016 common stock offering resulting in net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering costs, of $702.5 million and an increase in proceeds from debt, net of repayments, of $306.3 million, which were partially offset by an increase in distributions paid of $345.0 million
Election as a REIT
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
The Operating Partnership is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the Operating Partnership is required to take into account its allocable share of the Operating Partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the Operating Partnership may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property. Under the LPA, the Operating Partnership is required to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General partnerPartner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The Company conducted substantially all of itsthe Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and Canada and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Canadian federal jurisdictionPuerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. However, net leases that require the tenant to pay its allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, may reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
Through the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we were contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis, identifying and making acquisitions and investments on the Cole REITs’ behalf, and recommending to each of the Cole REIT’s respective board of directors an approach for providing investors with liquidity. In addition, we distributed the shares of common stock for certain of the Cole REITs and advised them regarding offerings, managed relationships with participating broker-dealers and financial advisors, and provided assistance in connection with compliance matters relating to the offerings. We received compensation and reimbursement for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment, management and disposition of their respective assets, as applicable. See “Note 17 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangements” to our consolidated financial statements in this report for abasis. For further explanation of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees.fees see Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable-rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes inon earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and treasury lock agreementsforwards in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We have limited operations in Canada and thus, are not exposed to material foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2017,2019, our debt included fixed-rate debt, including debt that has interest rates that are fixed with the use of derivative instruments, with a fair value and carrying value of $6.1$5.8 billion and $5.9$5.6 billion, respectively. Changes in market interest rates on our fixed rate debt impact the fair value of the debt, but they have no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates rise 100 basis points, and the fixed rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our debt to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 20172019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of $224.9$217.6 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of $279.1$236.0 million.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, our debt included variable-rate debt with a fair value and carrying value each of $200.1$164.5 million and $199.9 million.$164.4 million, respectively. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 20172019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates on our variable-rate notes payabledebt would increase or decrease our interest expense by $2.0$1.6 million annually. See Note 106Debt to our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, our interest rate swaps had a fair value that resulted in assetsnet liabilities of $0.6$27.8 million. See Note 11 –Derivatives7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2017,2019, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
In July 2017, the FCA announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Company is not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. The Company has contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest amounts on our variable rate debt as discussed in Note 6 –Debt and the swap rate for our interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion on risks related to changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined, or the use of alternative reference rates.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company is subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, geographies or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this document.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.

Item 9A.9A. Controls and Procedures.
I. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the General Partner
For purposes of the discussion in this Part I of Item 9A, the “Company” refers to the General Partner.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20172019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 20172019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
II. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the Operating Partnership
In the information incorporated by reference into this Part II of Item 9A, the term “Company” refers to the Operating Partnership, except as the context otherwise requires.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20172019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2019.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 20172019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal controlscontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, of the Company and our report dated February 21, 2018,25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion


The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal controlscontrol over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exist,exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal controlscontrol over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 201825, 2020





Item 9B. Other Information.
The following disclosure would have otherwise been filed in a Current Report on Form 8-K under the heading “Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.”
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Glenn J. Rufrano
Effective February 21, 2018, the Company amended (the “Rufrano Amendment”) the Employment Agreement dated as of March 10, 2015 with Glenn J. Rufrano (the “Rufrano Employment Agreement”), to extend Mr. Rufrano’s term as Chief Executive Officer to April 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Rufrano Amendment, future annual long term incentive awards will not have a minimum guaranteed amount and the vesting of any unvested awards upon termination will be governed by the terms in the applicable award agreement.

The foregoing description of the Rufrano Amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such amendment a copy of which is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

None

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
ThisThe information required by this Item will be containedincluded in our definitive proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”),Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
The Financial Statements are included herein at pages F-1 through F-68.F-59.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included herein on page F-69.F-60.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included herein on pages F-70F-61 through F-204.F-178.
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans Held for Investment is included herein on page F-205.F-179.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No. Description
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.5
3.1 
3.2 
3.3 
3.4 
3.5 
3.6 
3.7 

Exhibit No.Description
3.8 
3.9 
3.10 
3.11 
3.12 
3.13 
4.1 
4.2 
4.3 

Exhibit No.Description
4.4 
4.5
4.6 
4.7
4.84.7 
4.94.8 
4.104.9 
4.114.10 
4.124.11 
4.13 
4.14
4.154.14 
4.164.15 
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20*
10.1 
10.2
10.3
10.4†
10.210.5† 

Exhibit No.Description
10.310.6† 
10.410.7† 
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.1510.8† 
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.2210.9† 

10.23
Exhibit No.Description
10.10† 

Exhibit No.Description
10.2410.11† 
10.2510.12† 
10.2610.13† 
10.2710.14† 
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.3110.15† 
10.3210.16† 
10.17†
10.18†
10.3310.19† 
10.34*10.20† 
10.35*10.21† 
10.36*
10.37*10.22† 
10.38*10.23† 
10.24†
10.25†
10.26†
10.27†
10.39*10.28† 
10.29†
10.40*10.30 
10.41*
12.1*

Exhibit No.Description
10.31
21.1* 
23.1* 
23.2* 
31.1* 
31.2* 
31.3* 

Exhibit No.Description
31.4* 
32.1** 
32.2** 
32.3** 
32.4** 
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101.*).
_____________________________
*Filed herewith
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not Applicable



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 VEREIT, INC.
 By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
 By: VEREIT, Inc., its sole general partner
 By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
 Michael J. Bartolotta
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 21, 201825, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name Capacity * Date
     
/s/ Glenn J. Rufrano Chief Executive Officer February 21, 201825, 2020
Glenn J. Rufrano (Principal Executive Officer and Director)  
     
/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 21, 201825, 2020
Michael J. Bartolotta (Principal Financial Officer)  
     
/s/ Gavin B. Brandon Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer February 21, 201825, 2020
Gavin B. Brandon (Principal Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Hugh R. Frater Director, Non-Executive Chairman February 21, 201825, 2020
Hugh R. Frater    
     
/s/ David B. Henry Director February 21, 201825, 2020
David B. Henry    
     
/s/ Mary Hogan Preusse Director February 21, 201825, 2020
Mary Hogan Preusse    
     
/s/ Richard J. Lieb Director February 21, 201825, 2020
Richard J. Lieb    
     
/s/ Mark S. Ordan Director February 21, 201825, 2020
Mark S. Ordan    
     
/s/ Eugene A. Pinover Director February 21, 201825, 2020
Eugene A. Pinover    
     
/s/ Julie G. Richardson Director February 21, 201825, 2020
Julie G. Richardson    

*Each person is signing in his or her capacity as an officer and/or director of VEREIT, Inc., which is the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 Page
Financial Statements
F-69
F-70
F-205



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2018,25, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards requiredrequire that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the riskrisks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Investments - Impairments- Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered from the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. Estimating future undiscounted cash flows requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimating the expected holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability.
In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the carrying value of real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. During 2019, the Company recorded $47.1 million of impairment charges.


We identified the impairment of real estate assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions required to evaluate the recoverability of real estate assets, including the estimated holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability. Auditing the assumptions used by the Company in estimating future undiscounted cash flows required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the Company’s recoverability analysis.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures to test the assumptions used by management to estimate forecasted cash flows, including management’s expected holding period of such real estate assets, consisted of the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over the inputs of the forecasted cash flows used in the recoverability analysis.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the undiscounted future cash flows analysis, including estimates of future occupancy levels, market rental revenue, and capitalization rates, in addition to the assessment of expected remaining holding period and changes in management’s intent with respect to the expected holding period for each real estate asset with possible impairment indicators by:
1.Making inquiries of accounting and operations management.
2.Comparing the source data and management’s assumptions to the Company’s historical results and external market sources.
3.Testing the mathematical accuracy of the undiscounted future cash flows analysis.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 201825, 2020


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the partners of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P and subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
February 21, 2018

25, 2020
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.




F-3F-4

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)



 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS        
Real estate investments, at cost:        
Land $2,865,855
 $2,895,625
 $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,711,845
 10,644,296
 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 2,037,675
 2,044,521
 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 15,615,375
 15,584,442
 14,843,870
 15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 2,908,028
 2,331,643
 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 12,707,347
 13,252,799
 11,249,623
 12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 42,784
 46,077
 68,825
 35,289
Investment in direct financing leases, net 19,539
 39,455
Investment securities, at fair value 40,974
 47,215
Mortgage notes receivable, net 20,294
 22,764
Cash and cash equivalents 34,176
 253,479
 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 27,662
 45,018
 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 304,989
 314,305
 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,391
 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Due from affiliates, net 6,041
 15,904
Assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net
 163,999
 213,167
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $14,705,578

$15,587,574
 $13,280,680

$13,963,493
        
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        
Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net $2,082,692
 $2,671,106
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,821,494
 2,226,224
 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 984,258
 973,340
 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 185,000
 496,578
 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 198,551
 224,023
 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 136,474
 134,861
 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 62,985
 67,971
 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 175,301
 162,578
 150,364
 186,623
Due to affiliates 66
 16
Liabilities related to discontinued operations
 15,881
 11,344
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,662,702
 6,968,041
 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) 
 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 428
 428
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 974,208,583 and 974,146,650 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively 9,742
 9,741
Additional paid-in-capital 12,654,258
 12,640,171
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 

 


Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 309
 428
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 10,768
 9,675
Additional paid-in capital 13,251,962
 12,615,472
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (3,569) (2,556) (27,670) (1,280)
Accumulated deficit (4,776,581) (4,200,423) (6,399,626) (5,467,236)
Total stockholders’ equity 7,884,278
 8,447,361
 6,835,743
 7,157,059
Non-controlling interests 158,598
 172,172
 7,535
 143,085
Total equity 8,042,876
 8,619,533
 6,843,278
 7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $14,705,578

$15,587,574
 $13,280,680

$13,963,493


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-4F-5

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Revenues:      
Rental income $1,154,147
 $1,229,992
 $1,342,507
Operating expense reimbursements 98,138
 105,455
 98,628
Total revenues 1,252,285

1,335,447
 1,441,135
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 3,402
 1,321
 6,243
Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries 47,960
 3,884
 33,628
Property operating 128,717
 144,428
 130,855
General and administrative 58,603
 51,927
 67,137
Depreciation and amortization 706,802
 762,038
 821,727
Impairments 50,548
 182,820
 91,755
Total operating expenses 996,032

1,146,418
 1,151,345
Operating income 256,253

189,029
 289,790
Other (expense) income:      
Interest expense (289,766) (317,376) (358,392)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 18,373
 (771) 4,812
Other income, net 6,242
 5,251
 9,366
Reserve for loan loss 
 
 (15,300)
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,763
 9,783
 9,092
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net 2,976
 (1,191) (1,460)
Total other expenses, net (259,412)
(304,304) (351,882)
Income (loss) before taxes and real estate dispositions (3,159)
(115,275) (62,092)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 61,536
 45,524
 (72,311)
Income (loss) before taxes 58,377

(69,751)
(134,403)
Provision for income taxes (6,882) (7,136) (4,589)
Income (loss) from continuing operations 51,495

(76,887) (138,992)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (19,117) (123,937) (184,500)
Net income (loss) 32,378
 (200,824) (323,492)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 (560) 4,961
 7,139
Net income (loss) attributable to the General Partner $31,818

$(195,863) $(316,353)
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.02) $(0.13) $(0.20)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43)
Distributions declared per common share $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.28
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254

996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net
11,752

(164,237)
(197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes
(302,844)
(86,624)
58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106)
(91,725)
51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106) (88,030) 32,378
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 6,753
 2,256
 (560)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(300,353)
$(85,774)
$31,818
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss (income) loss attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partners.partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-5F-6

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)



  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Net income (loss) $32,378
 $(200,824) $(323,492)
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (18) (7,685) (15,694)
Reclassification of previous unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives into net income (loss) (70) 9,397
 11,706
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net (951) (2,271) (997)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net income (loss) as other income, net 
 
 110
Total other comprehensive loss (1,039) (559) (4,875)
       
Total comprehensive income (loss) 31,339
 (201,383) (328,367)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 (534) 4,989
 7,261
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the General Partner $30,805
 $(196,394)
$(321,106)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income (27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income (334,543) (85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests(1)
 7,800
 2,200
 (534)
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(326,743) $(83,485) $30,805

(1)Represents comprehensive loss (income) loss attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partners.partner.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-6F-7

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for share data)


  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,146,650
 $9,741
 $12,640,171
 $(2,556) $(4,200,423) $8,447,361
 $172,172
 $8,619,533
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (68,759) (1) (517) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,550) (2) (2,146) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 399,242
 4
 16,750
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) (535,657) 
 (535,657)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,227) (13,227)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 (571) (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 31,818
 560
 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (1,013) (26) (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,208,583
 $9,742
 $12,654,258
 $(3,569) $(4,776,581) $7,884,278
 $158,598
 $8,042,876
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 32,439
 
 241
 
 
 241
 (241) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (7,206,876) (72) (50,082) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (324,502) (2) (2,324) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 805,521
 7
 13,307
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) (532,144) 
 (532,144)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,048) (13,048)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 72
 
 (989) (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) (85,774) (2,256) (88,030)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 2,289
 56
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138
 $428
 967,515,165
 $9,675
 $12,615,472
 $(1,280) $(5,467,236) $7,157,059
 $143,085
 $7,300,144
Issuance of Common Stock, net 
 
 108,410,070
 1,084
 1,013,131
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 130,291
 1
 1,166
 
 
 1,167
 (1,167) 

  Preferred Stock Common Stock            
  Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2015 42,834,138
 $428
 905,530,431
 $9,055

$11,920,253

$2,728

$(2,778,576)
$9,153,888

$228,442

$9,382,330
Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,414) (2) (2,225) 
 
 (2,227) 
 (2,227)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 (377,623) (4) 14,504
 
 
 14,500
 
 14,500
Tax shortfall from equity-based compensation 
 
 
 
 (764) 
 
 (764) 
 (764)
Distributions declared on common stock 
 
 
 
 
 
 (248,476) (248,476) 
 (248,476)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (45,594) (45,594)
Distributions to participating securities 
 
 
 
 
 
 (410) (410) 
 (410)
Distributions to preferred shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,418) (71,418) (474) (71,892)
Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14,859
 14,859
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (316,353) (316,353) (7,139) (323,492)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (4,753) 
 (4,753) (122) (4,875)
Balance, December 31, 2015
42,834,138
 $428
 904,884,394
 $9,049
 $11,931,768
 $(2,025) $(3,415,233)
$8,523,987

$189,972

$8,713,959
Issuance of common stock, net 
 
 69,000,000
 690
 701,786
 
 
 702,476
 
 702,476
Conversion of OP units to common stock 
 
 15,450
 
 159
 
 
 159
 (159) 
Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (481,261) (5) (4,647) 
 
 (4,652) 
 (4,652)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 728,067
 7
 10,721
 
 
 10,728
 
 10,728
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 675
 675
Distributions declared on common stock 
 
 
 
 
 
 (516,703) (516,703) 
 (516,703)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,183) (13,183)
Distributions to participating securities 
 
 
 
 
 
 (492) (492) 
 (492)
Distributions to preferred shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Cumulative effect adjustment for equity-based compensation forfeitures 
 
 
 
 384
 
 (384) 
 
 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (195,863) (195,863) (4,961) (200,824)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (531) 
 (531) (28) (559)
Balance, December 31, 2016 42,834,138

$428

974,146,650

$9,741

$12,640,171

$(2,556)
$(4,200,423)
$8,447,361

$172,172

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common stock under the Share Repurchase Program (1)
 
 
 (68,759) (1) (517) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,550) (2) (2,146) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 399,242
 4
 16,750
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions declared on common stock 
 
 
 
 
 
 (535,737) (535,737) 
 (535,737)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,227) (13,227)


F-7F-8

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for share data)




  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Conversion of Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 $1
 
 $
 $922
 $
 $
 $923
 $(923) $
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (120) 
 
 (300,002) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (200,331) (2) (1,616) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 990,789
 10
 13,091
 
 
 13,101
 
 13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) (562,195) 
 (562,195)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,494) (9,494)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 117
 
 (1,445) (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (68,397) (68,397) (91) (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 (91,920) 
 
 (91,920) (126,590) (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of equity 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 
 2,071
 (2,071) 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) (300,353) (6,753) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (26,390) (1,047) (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246

$309

1,076,845,984

$10,768

$13,251,962

$(27,670)
$(6,399,626)
$6,835,743

$7,535

$6,843,278

  Preferred Stock Common Stock            
  Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Distributions to participating securities 
 $
 
 $
 $
 $
 $(491) $(491) $
 $(491)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 31,818
 560
 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (1,013) (26) (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,208,583
 $9,742
 $12,654,258
 $(3,569) $(4,776,581) $7,884,278
 $158,598
 $8,042,876

(1)
The Company’s Share Repurchase Program (as defined in Note 15 – Equity), which was authorized by the board of directors on May 12, 2017, allows for the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock over the next 12 months.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-8F-9

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)


 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:    
      
  
Net income (loss) $32,378
 $(200,824) $(323,492)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 745,499
 806,548
 866,549
 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
(Gain) loss on real estate assets and joint venture, net (61,536) (55,722) 65,582
Held for sale loss on discontinued operations 20,027
 
 
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 50,548
 303,751
 305,094
 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity-based compensation 16,751
 10,728
 14,500
 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Reserve for loan loss 
 
 15,300
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated entities (2,726) 415
 (2,361)
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities and gain on joint venture (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 3,646
 1,433
 4,873
 284
 1,366
 3,646
Gain on early repayment of mortgage notes receivable and sale of investment securities (65) 
 (65)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net (2,976) 1,191
 1,460
(Gain) loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (18,373) 771
 (4,812)
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Investment in direct financing leases 2,097
 3,976
 2,035
 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net (21,394) (52,626) (63,195)
Due from affiliates, net 1,163
 (416) 25,489
Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 13,812
 
 
 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 10,742
 (3,323) (999) (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities (395) (17,740) (45,934)
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 50
 (214) (329) 
 (66) 50
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale 4,019
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities 793,267
 797,948
 859,695
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603) 493,914

793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Investments in real estate assets (699,004) (100,194) (36,319) (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (21,694) (16,568) (18,569) (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (14,850) (17,411) (57,682) (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
Principal repayments received from borrowers 6,796
 5,417
 6,921
Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities 
 (25,777) 
 (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,972
 2,580
 6,479
 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 445,525
 1,000,700
 1,009,107
 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,191) (2,259) (1,911) (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (37,226) (17,856) (16,542) (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 400
 
 392
 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 36,111
 13,305
 48,702
 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 355
 
 839
 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to affiliates (16,400) (10,300) (10,000)
Line of credit repayments from affiliates 25,100
 50,000
 10,000
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (274,106) 881,637
 941,417
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119

(274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 4,652
 3,112
 1,445
 705
 187
 4,652
Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment and swap termination costs (424,385) (337,022) (188,892)
Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 329,000
 1,033,000
 60,000
 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility, including swap termination costs (645,107) (1,993,000) (1,784,000)
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 600,000
 1,000,000
 
 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Payments on corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs 
 (1,311,203) 
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)


F-9F-10

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)




 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Payments of deferred financing costs (9,575) (19,872) (2,436)
Proceeds from 2016 Term Loan 
 300,000
 
Repayment of 2016 Term Loan 
 (300,000) 
Repurchases of common stock under the Share Repurchase Program (518) 
 
Repurchases of common stock to settle tax obligations (2,148) (4,652) (2,227)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount 
 702,765
 
Payments of equity issuance costs 
 (280) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 101
 675
 
 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (608,615) (580,508) (235,494) (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (756,595) (1,506,985) (2,151,604) (525,398) (655,406)
(756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (237,434) 172,600
 (350,492) (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
            
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 301,470
 128,870
 479,362
 $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations (2,973) (4,968) (5,850) 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 298,497
 123,902
 473,512
 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
            
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period 64,036
 301,470
 128,870
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations (2,198) (2,973) (4,968) 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $61,838
 $298,497
 $123,902
 $33,880
 $53,663

$61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash            
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $253,479
 $64,135
 $410,861
 $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 45,018
 59,767
 62,651
 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 298,497
 123,902
 473,512
 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
            
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 34,176
 253,479
 64,135
 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 27,662
 45,018
 59,767
 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $61,838
 $298,497
 $123,902
 $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-10F-11

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)


 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS        
Real estate investments, at cost:        
Land $2,865,855
 $2,895,625
 $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,711,845
 10,644,296
 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 2,037,675
 2,044,521
 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 15,615,375

15,584,442
 14,843,870

15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 2,908,028
 2,331,643
 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 12,707,347

13,252,799
 11,249,623

12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 42,784
 46,077
 68,825
 35,289
Investment in direct financing leases, net 19,539
 39,455
Investment securities, at fair value 40,974
 47,215
Mortgage notes receivable, net 20,294
 22,764
Cash and cash equivalents 34,176
 253,479
 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 27,662
 45,018
 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 304,989
 314,305
 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,391
 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Due from affiliates, net 6,041
 15,904
Assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net
 163,999
 213,167
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $14,705,578

$15,587,574
 $13,280,680

$13,963,493
        
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
    
Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net $2,082,692
 $2,671,106
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,821,494
 2,226,224
 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 984,258
 973,340
 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 185,000
 496,578
 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 198,551
 224,023
 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 136,474
 134,861
 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 62,985
 67,971
 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 175,301
 162,578
 150,364
 186,623
Due to affiliates 66
 16
Liabilities related to discontinued operations
 15,881
 11,344
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,662,702

6,968,041
 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) 

 

General Partner's preferred equity, 42,834,138 General Partner Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 782,073
 853,821
General Partner's common equity, 974,208,583 and 974,146,650 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively 7,102,205
 7,593,540
Limited Partner's preferred equity, 86,874 Limited Partner Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 3,027
 3,171
Limited Partner's common equity, 23,748,347 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively 154,266
 166,598
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 


 


General Partner's preferred equity, 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 General Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 460,504
 710,325
General Partner's common equity, 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 6,375,239
 6,446,734
Limited Partner's preferred equity, 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 1,869
 2,883
Limited Partner's common equity, 786,719 and 23,715,908 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 4,433
 138,931
Total partners’ equity 8,041,571

8,617,130
 6,842,045

7,298,873
Non-controlling interests 1,305
 2,403
 1,233
 1,271
Total equity 8,042,876

8,619,533
 6,843,278

7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $14,705,578

$15,587,574
 $13,280,680

$13,963,493


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-11F-12

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per unit data)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254
 996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net 11,752

(164,237) (197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes (302,844)
(86,624) 58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106) (91,725) 51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106)
(88,030) 32,378
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP $(307,004)
$(87,876) $32,572
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Revenues:      
Rental income $1,154,147
 $1,229,992
 $1,342,507
Operating expense reimbursements 98,138
 105,455
 98,628
Total revenues
1,252,285

1,335,447
 1,441,135
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 3,402
 1,321
 6,243
Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries 47,960
 3,884
 33,628
Property operating 128,717
 144,428
 130,855
General and administrative 58,603
 51,927
 67,137
Depreciation and amortization 706,802
 762,038
 821,727
Impairments 50,548
 182,820
 91,755
Total operating expenses
996,032

1,146,418
 1,151,345
Operating income
256,253

189,029
 289,790
Other (expense) income:      
Interest expense (289,766) (317,376) (358,392)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 18,373
 (771) 4,812
Other income, net 6,242
 5,251
 9,366
Reserve for loan loss 
 
 (15,300)
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,763
 9,783
 9,092
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net 2,976
 (1,191) (1,460)
Total other expenses, net
(259,412)
(304,304) (351,882)
Income (loss) before taxes and real estate dispositions
(3,159)
(115,275) (62,092)
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 61,536
 45,524
 (72,311)
Income (loss) before taxes
58,377
 (69,751) (134,403)
Provision for income taxes (6,882) (7,136) (4,589)
Income (loss) from continuing operations 51,495
 (76,887) (138,992)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (19,117) (123,937) (184,500)
Net income (loss)
32,378

(200,824) (323,492)
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 194
 14
 (1,274)
Net income (loss) attributable to the OP
$32,572

$(200,810) $(324,766)
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.02) $(0.13) $(0.20)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43)
Distributions declared per common unit $0.55
 $0.55
 $0.28

(1)Represents (income)net loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partners.partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.



F-12F-13

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Net income (loss) $32,378
 $(200,824) $(323,492)
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (18) (7,685) (15,694)
Reclassification of previous unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives into net income (loss) (70) 9,397
 11,706
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net (951) (2,271) (997)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net income (loss) as other income, net 
 
 110
Total other comprehensive loss (1,039)
(559) (4,875)
       
Total comprehensive income (loss) 31,339

(201,383) (328,367)
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 194
 14
 (1,274)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the OP $31,533

$(201,369) $(329,641)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income
(334,543)
(85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the OP
$(334,441)
$(85,531) $31,533

(1)Represents (income)comprehensive loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partners.partner.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.




F-13F-14

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for unit data)


  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $853,821
 86,874
 $3,171
 974,146,650
 $7,593,540
 23,748,347
 $166,598

$8,617,130
 $2,403

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (68,759) (518) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,550) (2,148) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 399,242
 16,754
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) 
 (13,060) (548,717) (167) (548,884)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (571) 
 
 (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 
 754
 32,572
 (194) 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (26) (1,039) 
 (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138

$782,073

86,874

$3,027

974,208,583

$7,102,205

23,748,347

$154,266

$8,041,571

$1,305

$8,042,876
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 32,439
 241
 (32,439) (241) 
 
 
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (7,206,876) (50,154) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (324,502) (2,326) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 805,521
 13,314
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) 
 (13,048) (545,192) 
 (545,192)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (917) 
 
 (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) 
 (2,102) (87,876) (154) (88,030)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 56
 2,345
 
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138

$710,325

86,874

$2,883

967,515,165

$6,446,734

23,715,908

$138,931

$7,298,873

$1,271

$7,300,144
Issuance of common OP Units, net 
 
 
 
 108,410,070
 1,014,215
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 130,291
 1,167
 (130,291) (1,167) 
 
 
Conversion of Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 923
 (37,108) (923) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (182,347) 
 
 
 (117,775) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (200,331) (1,618) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)


F-15

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for unit data)
  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      
  Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2015 42,834,138
 $996,987
 86,874
 $3,375
 905,530,431
 $8,157,167

23,763,797

$201,102

$9,358,631

$23,699

$9,382,330
 Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,414) (2,227) 
 
 (2,227) 
 (2,227)
 Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 (377,623) 14,500
 
 
 14,500
 
 14,500
 Tax shortfall from equity-based compensation 
 
 
 
 
 (764) 
 
 (764) 
 (764)
 Distributions to Common OP Units and non-controlling interests 
 
 
 
 
 (249,300) 
 (7,619) (256,919) (37,975) (294,894)
 Distributions to Preferred OP Units 
 (71,418) 
 (60) 
   
 
 (71,478) 
 (71,478)
 Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 14,859
 14,859
 Net (loss) income 
 
 
 
 
 (316,353) 
 (8,413) (324,766) 1,274
 (323,492)
 Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (4,605) 
 (270) (4,875) 
 (4,875)
Balance, December 31, 2015 42,834,138
 $925,569
 86,874
 $3,315
 904,884,394
 $7,598,418
 23,763,797
 $184,800

$8,712,102
 $1,857

$8,713,959
Issuance of common units 
 
 
 
 69,000,000
 702,476
 
 
 702,476
 
 702,476
Conversion of Limited Partners' Common OP Units to General Partner's Common OP Units 
 
 
 
 15,450
 159
 (15,450) (159) 
 
 
 Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (481,261) (4,652) 
 
 (4,652) 
 (4,652)
 Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 728,067
 10,728
 
 
 10,728
 
 10,728
 Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 675
 675
 Distributions to Common OP Units and non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 (517,195) 
 (13,068) (530,263) (115) (530,378)
 Distributions to Preferred OP Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
 Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (195,863) 
 (4,947) (200,810) (14) (200,824)
 Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (531) 
 (28) (559) 
 (559)
Balance, December 31, 2016 42,834,138

$853,821

86,874

$3,171

974,146,650

$7,593,540

23,748,347

$166,598

$8,617,130

$2,403

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common OP Units under the Share Repurchase Program 
 
 
 
 (68,759) (518) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
 Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,550) (2,148) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
 Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 399,242
 16,754
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
 Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
 Distributions to Common OP Units and non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 (536,228) 
 (13,060) (549,288) (167) (549,455)
 Distributions to Preferred OP Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
 Disposition of consolidated joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
 Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 
 754
 32,572
 (194) 32,378
 Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (26) (1,039) 
 (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138

$782,073

86,874

$3,027

974,208,583

$7,102,205

23,748,347

$154,266

$8,041,571

$1,305

$8,042,876


  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Equity-based compensation, net 
 $
 
 $
 990,789
 $13,101
 
 $
 $13,101
 $
 $13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) 
 (9,494) (571,689) 
 (571,689)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (1,328) 
 
 (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (68,397) 
 (91) 
 
 
 
 (68,488) 
 (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
 
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 
 (91,920) (22,798,898) (126,590) (218,510) 
 (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of capital 
 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 (2,071) 
 
 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) 
 (6,651) (307,004) (102) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (1,047) (27,437) 
 (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246
 $460,504
 49,766
 $1,869
 1,076,845,984
 $6,375,239
 786,719
 $4,433
 $6,842,045
 $1,233
 $6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-14F-16

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)


 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income (loss) $32,378
 $(200,824) $(323,492)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 745,499
 806,548
 866,549
 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
(Gain) loss on real estate assets and joint venture, net (61,536) (55,722) 65,582
Held for sale loss on discontinued operations 20,027
 
 
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 50,548
 303,751
 305,094
 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Reserve for loan loss 
 
 15,300
Equity-based compensation 16,751
 10,728
 14,500
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated entities (2,726) 415
 (2,361)
Equity based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 3,646
 1,433
 4,873
 284
 1,366
 3,646
Gain on early repayment of mortgage notes receivable and sale of investment securities (65) 
 (65)
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net (2,976) 1,191
 1,460
(Gain) loss on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (18,373) 771
 (4,812)
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Investment in direct financing leases 2,097
 3,976
 2,035
 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net (21,394) (52,626) (63,195)
Due from affiliates, net 1,163
 (416) 25,489
Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 13,812
 
 
 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 10,742
 (3,323) (999) (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities (395) (17,740) (45,934)
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 50
 (214) (329) 
 (66) 50
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale 4,019
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities 793,267

797,948

859,695
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603)
493,914
 793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Investments in real estate assets (699,004) (100,194) (36,319) (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (21,694) (16,568) (18,569) (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (14,850) (17,411) (57,682) (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
Principal repayments received from borrowers 6,796
 5,417
 6,921
Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities 
 (25,777) 
 (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,972
 2,580
 6,479
 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 445,525
 1,000,700
 1,009,107
 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,191) (2,259) (1,911) (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 400
 
 392
 9,837
 46,966
 400
Deposits for real estate assets (37,226) (17,856) (16,542)
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 36,111
 13,305
 48,702
 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 355
 
 839
 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to affiliates (16,400) (10,300) (10,000)
Line of credit repayments from affiliates 25,100
 50,000
 10,000
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (274,106) 881,637

941,417
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119
 (274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 4,652
 3,112
 1,445
 705
 187
 4,652
Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment and swap termination costs (424,385) (337,022) (188,892)
Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 329,000
 1,033,000
 60,000
 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility, including swap termination costs (645,107) (1,993,000) (1,784,000)
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 600,000
 1,000,000
 
 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Payments on corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs 
 (1,311,203) 
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)


F-15F-17

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)


 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Payments of deferred financing costs (9,575) (19,872) (2,436)
Proceeds from 2016 Term Loan 
 300,000
 
Repayment of 2016 Term Loan 
 (300,000) 
Repurchases of common units under the Share Repurchase Program (518) 
 
Repurchases of common units to settle tax obligations (2,148) (4,652) (2,227)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Units, net of underwriters’ discount 
 702,765
 
Payments of equity issuance costs 
 (280) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 101
 675
 
 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (608,615) (580,508) (235,494) (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (756,595)
(1,506,985)
(2,151,604) (525,398)
(655,406) (756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (237,434) 172,600

(350,492) (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
            
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 301,470
 128,870
 479,362
 $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations (2,973) (4,968) (5,850) 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 298,497
 123,902
 473,512
 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
            
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period 64,036
 301,470
 128,870
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations (2,198) (2,973) (4,968) 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $61,838
 $298,497

$123,902
 $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash            
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $253,479
 $64,135
 $410,861
 $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 45,018
 59,767
 62,651
 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 298,497
 123,902
 473,512
 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
            
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 34,176
 253,479
 64,135
 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 27,662
 45,018
 59,767
 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $61,838
 $298,497
 $123,902
 $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-16F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 20172019




Note 1 – Organization
VEREIT® is a Maryland corporation, incorporated on December 2, 2010, that qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. The OP is a Delaware limited partnership of which the General Partner is the sole general partner. VEREIT’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and its 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VERVER PRF,” respectively. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to VEREIT, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP.
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties. The Company actively manages its portfolio considering a number of metrics including property type, concentration and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity.
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through the OP. VEREIT is the sole general partner and holder of 97.6%99.9% of the common equity interests in the OP as of December 31, 2017 with the remaining 2.4% of the common equity interests owned by unaffiliated investors and certain former directors, officers and employees of ARC Properties Advisors, LLC (the “Former Manager”).2019. Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding common units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP Units”) or Series F Preferred Units of limited partnership interests in the OP (“Series F Preferred Units”), for a period of one year and meeting the other requirements in the LPA, unless we otherwise consent to an earlier redemption, is otherwise consented to by VEREIT, holders of OP Units have the right to redeem the OP Unitsunits for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of VEREIT’s Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, or, at theour option, of VEREIT, a corresponding number of shares of VEREIT’s Common Stock.Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the LPA. The remaining rights of the holders of OP Units are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the General Partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP’s assets.
The actions of the OP and its relationship with the General Partner are governed by the LPA. The General Partner does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the OP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the General Partner and the OP are the same. Additionally, pursuant to the LPA, all administrative expenses and expenses associated with the formation, continuity, existence and operation of the General Partner incurred by the General Partner on the OP’s behalf shall be treated as expenses of the OP. Further, when the General Partner issues any equity instrument that has been approved by the General Partner’s boardBoard of directors,Directors, the LPA requires the OP to issue to the General Partner equity instruments with substantially similar terms, to protect the integrity of the Company’s umbrella partnership REIT structure, pursuant to which each holder of interests in the OP has a proportionate economic interest in the OP reflecting its capital contributions thereto. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to the General Partner are referred to as General“General Partner OP Units.Units” and “General Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to parties other than the General Partner are referred to as Limited“Limited Partner OP Units.Units” and “Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. The LPA also provides that the OP issue debt with terms and provisions consistent with debt issued by the General Partner. The LPA will be amended to provide for the issuance of any additional class of equivalent equity instruments to the extent the General Partner’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors authorizes the issuance of any new class of equity securities.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment’s operations were conducted through Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. (“CCA”), an Arizona corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the OP. CCA was treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) under Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). As discussed further in Note 5 —Discontinued Operations, on November 13, 2017, the OP entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC. Under the terms of the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company agreed to sell to the Cole Purchaser all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCA and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. As the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement during the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company's financial results are reported as a single segment, and the assets, liabilities and related financial results of substantially all of the Cole Capital segment are reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations.
Note 2 –Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting
The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).


F-17F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and a consolidated joint venture arrangements.venture. The portionsportion of the consolidated joint venture arrangements not owned by the Company areis presented as non-controlling interestsinterest in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. In addition, as described in Note 1 – Organization, and Note 12 – Equity, certain third parties have been issued OP Units and Series F Preferred Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Upon conversion of OP Units to Common Stock, any differenceEquity is reallocated between the fair value of shares of Common Stock issuedcontrolling and the carrying value ofnoncontrolling interests in the OP Units converted is recordedupon a change in ownership. At the end of each reporting period, noncontrolling interests in the OP are adjusted to reflect their ownership percentage in the OP through a reallocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP, as a component of equity.applicable. As of each of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, there were approximately 0.8 million and 23.7 million Limited Partner OP Units outstanding.

issued and outstanding, respectively, and 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding, respectively.
For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity.
The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.
Reclassification
As described below, the following items previously reported haveThe (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net line item has been reclassifiedcombined into other income, net for prior periods presented to conformbe consistent with the current period’syear presentation.
Direct financing lease income has been reclassified to rental income for all periods presented.
The assets and liabilities to be transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement and related financial results are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In connection with the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18, discussed in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to current presentation in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-15, the Company reclassified a portion of distributions received from equity method investments which were previously reported in cash flows provided by operating activities to cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-18, transfers to or from restricted cash which have previously been shown in the Company’s investing activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows are now required to be shown as part of the total change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments, real estate investment impairment, allocation of purchase price of real estate asset acquisitions and income taxes.

F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Real Estate Investments
The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for intangible lease assets.

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their respectiverelative fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, fixtures and improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above-market and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases. In estimating fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the initial term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease, then the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to expense.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, including any bargain renewal periods. Above-market leases are amortized as a reduction to rental incomerevenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental incomerevenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may result in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.


In January 2017, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions were capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as described above. Prior to January 1, 2017, external costs related to property acquisitions were expensed as incurred. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Assets Held for Sale
Upon classifying a real estate investment as held for sale, the Company will no longer recognize depreciation expense related to the depreciable assets of the property. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. See Note 4 –3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion regarding properties held for sale.
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Company will reclassify the property as held and used. The Company measures and records a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (i) its carrying value before the property was classified

F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (ii) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Development Activities
Project costs, which include interest expense, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives.

F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Discontinued Operations
The Company reports discontinued operations when a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 514Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements (the “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures”) using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the joint ventures’ earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 4 –Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles for further discussion on investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.
Cole REITs
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company owned equity investments in Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc. (“CCPT IV”), Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc. (“INAV”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”), and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V” and collectively with CCPT IV, INAV, CCIT II and CCIT III, the “Cole REITs”). The Company accounts for these investments using the equity method of accounting which requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the respective entity’s earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the Cole REITs in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements for further discussion on the Cole REITs.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
The Company leases its corporate office facilities under operating leases. Leasehold improvements related to these are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life or remaining lease term.
Property and equipment, which typically include computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, among other items, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. The Company reassesses the useful lives of its property and equipment and adjusts the future monthly depreciation expense based on the new useful life, as applicable. If the Company disposes of an asset, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are written off upon disposal.
Goodwill
In the case of a business combination, after identifying all tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, the excess consideration paid over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and assumed, respectively, represents goodwill.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, as discussed in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” in the event the Company disposed of a property, or classified a property as an asset held for sale, that constituted a business under U.S. GAAP, the Company allocated a portion of the real estate investments reporting unit’s goodwill to that property in determining the gain or loss on the

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

disposal of the property. The amount of goodwill allocated to the business was based on the relative fair value of the business to the fair value of the reporting unit.
Impairments
Real Estate Assets
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators that the Company considers include, but are not limited to, decrease in net operating income, bankruptcy or other credit concerns of a property’s major tenant or tenants, such as history of late payments, rental concessions and other factors, as well as significant decreases in a property’s revenues due to lease terminations, vacancies, co-tenancy clauses or reduced lease rates. When impairment indicators are identified or if a property is considered to have a more likely than not probability of being disposed of within the next 12 to 24 months, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. U.S. GAAP requires us to utilize the Company’s expected holding period of our properties when assessing recoverability. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of real estate assets are discussed in Note 9 – Fair Value Measures. See also Note 4 –Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles for further discussion regarding real estate investment activity.
Goodwill
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company’s annual testing date is during the fourth quarter. In 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Others (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which allows the Company to test goodwill for impairment by comparing the carrying value of net assets to their respective fair value. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, an impairment charge will be recorded for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value. The Company estimates the fair value using discounted cash flows and relevant competitor multiples. The evaluation of goodwill for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. While the Company believes its assumptions are reasonable, there are no guarantees as to actual results. Changes in assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial results. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of goodwill are discussed in detail in Note 9 – Fair Value Measures. Goodwill activity is also discussed in Note 3Goodwill and goodwill related to discontinued operations is discussed in Note 5 —Discontinued Operations.
Intangible Assets
The Company’s intangible assets primarily consisted of management and advisory contracts that the discontinued operations, Cole Capital, had with certain Cole REITs. There were no impairment indicators identified during the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company tested intangible assets for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company adjusts the intangible assets to their respective fair values and recognized an impairment loss.


F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

InvestmentConvertible Debt
Summary and Obligations
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased $80.7 million of the 2020 Convertible Notes and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $321.8 million aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Convertible Notes outstanding. The OP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the General Partner. There were no changes to the terms of the 2020 Convertible Notes during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company believes that it was in Unconsolidated Entitiescompliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the 2020 Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2019.

Mortgage Notes Payable
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of $1.5 billion, which was collateralized by 355 properties, reflecting a decrease from December 31, 2018 of $388.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily related to prepayments of mortgage notes payable. Our mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the weighted-average rate of 5.05% per annum and had a weighted-average maturity of 2.8 years. We may in the future incur additional mortgage debt on the properties we currently own or use long-term non-recourse financing to acquire additional properties.
The payment terms of our loan obligations vary. In general, only interest amounts are payable monthly with all unpaid principal and interest due at maturity. Some of our loan agreements require that we comply with specific reporting and financial covenants mainly related to debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Each loan that has these requirements has specific ratio thresholds that must be met.
Restrictions on Loan Covenants
Our mortgage loan obligations generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios), as well as the maintenance of a minimum net worth. The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends as of December 31, 2019.
Derivative Activity
As discussed in Note 6 –Debt and Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million notional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, to hedge interest rate volatility. Due to an improvement in the Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company also entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 120 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments), with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt.
Dividends
On November 5, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of Common Stock (equaling an annualized dividend of $0.55 per share) for the fourth quarter of 2019 to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2019, which was paid on January 15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP Unit.
Our Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in Note 12 – Equity to our consolidated financial statements, will pay cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis).

Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Principal payments - mortgage notes $1,529,057
 $188,385
 $588,466
 $745,238
 $6,968
Interest payments - mortgage notes (1)
 210,667
 74,251
 102,135
 33,154
 1,127
Principal payments - Credit Facility 1,050,000
 
 150,000
 900,000
 
Interest payments - Credit Facility (1) (2)
 119,683
 38,281
 72,246
 9,156
 
Principal payments - corporate bonds 2,850,000
 
 
 500,000
 2,350,000
Interest payments - corporate bonds 796,198
 119,988
 239,976
 219,212
 217,022
Principal payments - convertible debt 321,802
 321,802
 
 
 
Interest payments - convertible debt 11,531
 11,531
 
 
 
Operating and ground lease commitments 334,977
 22,287
 44,406
 42,827
 225,457
Other commitments (3)
 4,345
 4,345
 
 
 
Total $7,228,260
 $780,870
 $1,197,229
 $2,449,587
 $2,800,574
____________________________________
(1)Interest payments due in future periods on the $164.4 million of variable rate debt were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.
(2)As of December 31, 2019, we had $900.0 million of variable rate debt on the Credit Facility Term Loan effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the interest rates effectively fixed under our swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(3)Includes the Company’s share of capital expenditures related to an expansion project of the property held within an unconsolidated joint venture and letters of credit outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, all letters of credit outstanding were terminated.
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in operating activities increased $601.5 million to $107.6 million from $493.9 million net cash provided by operating activities during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $524.5 million increase in litigation and non-routine costs, net, including litigation settlements, paid during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $462.1 million to $613.2 million from $151.1 million during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily related to an increase in cash proceeds from dispositions of real estate and joint ventures of $565.2 million and a decrease in investments in real estate assets of $106.0 million, offset by a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations of $122.9 million, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of CMBS and mortgage notes receivables of $37.1 million and an increase in payments for capital expenditures and leasing costs and real estate developments of $34.6 million.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $525.4 million decreased $130.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from $655.4 million during the same period in 2018. The decrease was primarily related to $1.0 billion of proceeds received from the issuance of Common Stock in 2019, offset by the redemption of $300.1 million of Series F Preferred Stock in 2019, an increase in payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs of $236.2 million, and a decrease of $170.0 million in net proceeds related to the credit facilities, corporate bonds and convertible notes. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, $192.0 million of payments were made related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units, with no comparable activity during the same period in 2018.
Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 21, 2019, for the cash flow analysis for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.


Election as a REIT
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019.
The Operating Partnership is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the Operating Partnership is required to determine whether an eventtake into account its allocable share of the Operating Partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the Operating Partnership may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property. Under the LPA, the Operating Partnership is required to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The Company conducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. However, net leases that require the tenant to pay its allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, may reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
Through the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we were contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis. For further explanation of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees see Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or change in circumstances has occurred that mayare reasonably likely to have a significantcurrent or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse effectchanges in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable-rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and forwards in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included fixed-rate debt, including debt that has interest rates that are fixed with the use of derivative instruments, with a fair value and carrying value of $5.8 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively. Changes in market interest rates on our fixed rate debt impact the fair value of anythe debt, but they have no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates rise 100 basis points, and the fixed rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our debt to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of $217.6 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of $236.0 million.
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included variable-rate debt with a fair value and carrying value of $164.5 million and $164.4 million, respectively. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates on our variable-rate debt would increase or decrease our interest expense by $1.6 million annually. See Note 6 –Debt to our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2019, our interest rate swaps had a fair value that resulted in net liabilities of $27.8 million. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2019, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
In July 2017, the FCA announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Company is not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. The Company has contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest amounts on our variable rate debt as discussed in Note 6 –Debt and the swap rate for our interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion on risks related to changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined, or the use of alternative reference rates.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company is subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, geographies or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this document.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
I. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the General Partner
For purposes of the discussion in this Part I of Item 9A, the “Company” refers to the General Partner.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its investmentinherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
II. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the Operating Partnership
In the information incorporated by reference into this Part II of Item 9A, the term “Company” refers to the Operating Partnership, except as the context otherwise requires.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the unconsolidated entities. IfSEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an eventevaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in circumstanceour internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has occurred,materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to evaluate its investmentbe independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the unconsolidated entitycircumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for potentialour opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020



Item 9B. Other Information.
None

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item will be included in our Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
The Financial Statements are included herein at pages F-1 through F-59.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included herein on page F-60.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included herein on pages F-61 through F-178.
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans Held for Investment is included herein on page F-179.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No.Description
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
4.1
4.2
4.3

Exhibit No.Description
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20*
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4†
10.5†
10.6†
10.7†
10.8†
10.9†

Exhibit No.Description
10.10†
10.11†
10.12†
10.13†
10.14†
10.15†
10.16†
10.17†
10.18†
10.19†
10.20†
10.21†
10.22†
10.23†
10.24†
10.25†
10.26†
10.27†
10.28†
10.29†
10.30

Exhibit No.Description
10.31
21.1*
23.1*
23.2*
31.1*
31.2*
31.3*
31.4*
32.1**
32.2**
32.3**
32.4**
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101.*).
_____________________________
*Filed herewith
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not Applicable


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VEREIT, INC.
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By: VEREIT, Inc., its sole general partner
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 25, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameCapacity *Date
/s/ Glenn J. RufranoChief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Glenn J. Rufrano(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
/s/ Michael J. BartolottaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Michael J. Bartolotta(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Gavin B. BrandonSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Gavin B. Brandon(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Hugh R. FraterDirector, Non-Executive ChairmanFebruary 25, 2020
Hugh R. Frater
/s/ David B. HenryDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
David B. Henry
/s/ Mary Hogan PreusseDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mary Hogan Preusse
/s/ Richard J. LiebDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Richard J. Lieb
/s/ Mark S. OrdanDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mark S. Ordan
/s/ Eugene A. PinoverDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Eugene A. Pinover
/s/ Julie G. RichardsonDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Julie G. Richardson

*Each person is signing in his or her capacity as an officer and/or director of VEREIT, Inc., which is the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Investments - Impairments- Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through monitoring of events and determine ifchanges in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its investment exceeds its fair value. An impairment charge is recorded when an impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. The evaluation of an investment in an unconsolidated entity for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions.  The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. No impairments of unconsolidated entities were identified during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
Leasehold improvements and property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of suchreal estate assets may not be recoverable. If this review indicates thatThe Company assesses the recoverability of real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the asset isassets will be recovered from the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. Estimating future undiscounted cash flows requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimating the expected holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability.
In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not recoverable,exceed the carrying value, the Company recordswill adjust the carrying value of real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss, measured atloss. Generally, fair value by estimated discounted cash flows or market appraisals. The evaluation of leasehold improvements and property and equipment for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. No impairments of leasehold improvements and property and equipment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts, as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. The Company deposits cash with several high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit of $250,000. At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured levels. Although the Company bears risk on amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it has not experienced and does not anticipate any losses due to the high quality of the institutions where the deposits are held.
Restricted Cash
The Company had $27.7 million and $45.0 million, respectively, in restricted cash as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Restricted cash primarily consists of reserves related to lease expirations, as well as maintenance, structural and debt service reserves. In accordance with certain debt agreements, rent from certain of the Company’s tenants is deposited directly into a lockbox account, from which the monthly debt service payments are disbursed to the lender and the excess funds are then disbursed to the Company. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2017 was $26.4 million in lender reserves and $1.3 million held in restricted lockbox accounts. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2016 was $40.7 million in lender reserves and $4.3 million held in restricted lockbox accounts.
Investment in Direct Financing Leases
The Company has acquired certain properties that are subject to leases that qualify as direct financing leases in accordance with U.S. GAAP due to the significance of the lease payments from the inception of the leases compared to the fair value of the property or due to bargain purchase options. Investments in direct financing leases represent the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term. The fair value of the remaining lease payments is estimateddetermined using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates that would representand recent comparable sales transactions. During 2019, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar typesCompany recorded $47.1 million of debt. The expected residual property value at the end of the lease term is estimated using market data and assessments of the remaining useful lives of the properties at the end of the lease terms, among other factors. Income from direct financing leases is calculated using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the lease.impairment charges.

We identified the impairment of real estate assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions required to evaluate the recoverability of real estate assets, including the estimated holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability. Auditing the assumptions used by the Company in estimating future undiscounted cash flows required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the Company’s recoverability analysis.
F-22How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures to test the assumptions used by management to estimate forecasted cash flows, including management’s expected holding period of such real estate assets, consisted of the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over the inputs of the forecasted cash flows used in the recoverability analysis.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the undiscounted future cash flows analysis, including estimates of future occupancy levels, market rental revenue, and capitalization rates, in addition to the assessment of expected remaining holding period and changes in management’s intent with respect to the expected holding period for each real estate asset with possible impairment indicators by:
1.Making inquiries of accounting and operations management.
2.Comparing the source data and management’s assumptions to the Company’s historical results and external market sources.
3.Testing the mathematical accuracy of the undiscounted future cash flows analysis.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the partners of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P and subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.


F-4

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)


  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870
 15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623
 12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 

 


Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 309
 428
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 10,768
 9,675
Additional paid-in capital 13,251,962
 12,615,472
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (27,670) (1,280)
Accumulated deficit (6,399,626) (5,467,236)
Total stockholders’ equity 6,835,743
 7,157,059
Non-controlling interests 7,535
 143,085
Total equity 6,843,278
 7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254

996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net
11,752

(164,237)
(197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes
(302,844)
(86,624)
58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106)
(91,725)
51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106) (88,030) 32,378
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 6,753
 2,256
 (560)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(300,353)
$(85,774)
$31,818
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-6

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income (27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income (334,543) (85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests(1)
 7,800
 2,200
 (534)
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(326,743) $(83,485) $30,805

(1)Represents comprehensive loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-7

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for share data)

  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,146,650
 $9,741
 $12,640,171
 $(2,556) $(4,200,423) $8,447,361
 $172,172
 $8,619,533
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (68,759) (1) (517) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,550) (2) (2,146) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 399,242
 4
 16,750
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) (535,657) 
 (535,657)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,227) (13,227)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 (571) (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 31,818
 560
 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (1,013) (26) (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,208,583
 $9,742
 $12,654,258
 $(3,569) $(4,776,581) $7,884,278
 $158,598
 $8,042,876
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 32,439
 
 241
 
 
 241
 (241) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (7,206,876) (72) (50,082) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (324,502) (2) (2,324) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 805,521
 7
 13,307
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) (532,144) 
 (532,144)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,048) (13,048)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 72
 
 (989) (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) (85,774) (2,256) (88,030)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 2,289
 56
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138
 $428
 967,515,165
 $9,675
 $12,615,472
 $(1,280) $(5,467,236) $7,157,059
 $143,085
 $7,300,144
Issuance of Common Stock, net 
 
 108,410,070
 1,084
 1,013,131
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 130,291
 1
 1,166
 
 
 1,167
 (1,167) 


F-8

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for share data)


  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Conversion of Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 $1
 
 $
 $922
 $
 $
 $923
 $(923) $
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (120) 
 
 (300,002) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (200,331) (2) (1,616) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 990,789
 10
 13,091
 
 
 13,101
 
 13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) (562,195) 
 (562,195)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,494) (9,494)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 117
 
 (1,445) (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (68,397) (68,397) (91) (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 (91,920) 
 
 (91,920) (126,590) (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of equity 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 
 2,071
 (2,071) 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) (300,353) (6,753) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (26,390) (1,047) (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246

$309

1,076,845,984

$10,768

$13,251,962

$(27,670)
$(6,399,626)
$6,835,743

$7,535

$6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-9

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:    
  
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity-based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities and gain on joint venture (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603) 493,914

793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119

(274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-10

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398) (655,406)
(756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663

$61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-11

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870

15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623

12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 


 


General Partner's preferred equity, 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 General Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 460,504
 710,325
General Partner's common equity, 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 6,375,239
 6,446,734
Limited Partner's preferred equity, 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 1,869
 2,883
Limited Partner's common equity, 786,719 and 23,715,908 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 4,433
 138,931
Total partners’ equity 6,842,045

7,298,873
Non-controlling interests 1,233
 1,271
Total equity 6,843,278

7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-12

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per unit data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254
 996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net 11,752

(164,237) (197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes (302,844)
(86,624) 58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106) (91,725) 51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106)
(88,030) 32,378
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP $(307,004)
$(87,876) $32,572
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-13

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income
(334,543)
(85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the OP
$(334,441)
$(85,531) $31,533

(1)Represents comprehensive loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-14

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $853,821
 86,874
 $3,171
 974,146,650
 $7,593,540
 23,748,347
 $166,598

$8,617,130
 $2,403

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (68,759) (518) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,550) (2,148) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 399,242
 16,754
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) 
 (13,060) (548,717) (167) (548,884)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (571) 
 
 (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 
 754
 32,572
 (194) 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (26) (1,039) 
 (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138

$782,073

86,874

$3,027

974,208,583

$7,102,205

23,748,347

$154,266

$8,041,571

$1,305

$8,042,876
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 32,439
 241
 (32,439) (241) 
 
 
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (7,206,876) (50,154) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (324,502) (2,326) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 805,521
 13,314
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) 
 (13,048) (545,192) 
 (545,192)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (917) 
 
 (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) 
 (2,102) (87,876) (154) (88,030)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 56
 2,345
 
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138

$710,325

86,874

$2,883

967,515,165

$6,446,734

23,715,908

$138,931

$7,298,873

$1,271

$7,300,144
Issuance of common OP Units, net 
 
 
 
 108,410,070
 1,014,215
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 130,291
 1,167
 (130,291) (1,167) 
 
 
Conversion of Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 923
 (37,108) (923) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (182,347) 
 
 
 (117,775) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (200,331) (1,618) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)


F-15

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Equity-based compensation, net 
 $
 
 $
 990,789
 $13,101
 
 $
 $13,101
 $
 $13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) 
 (9,494) (571,689) 
 (571,689)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (1,328) 
 
 (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (68,397) 
 (91) 
 
 
 
 (68,488) 
 (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
 
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 
 (91,920) (22,798,898) (126,590) (218,510) 
 (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of capital 
 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 (2,071) 
 
 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) 
 (6,651) (307,004) (102) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (1,047) (27,437) 
 (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246
 $460,504
 49,766
 $1,869
 1,076,845,984
 $6,375,239
 786,719
 $4,433
 $6,842,045
 $1,233
 $6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-16

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603)
493,914
 793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119
 (274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-17

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398)
(655,406) (756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)2019


Mortgage Notes Receivable
Note 1 – Organization
VEREIT is a Maryland corporation, incorporated on December 2, 2010, that qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. The OP is a Delaware limited partnership of which the General Partner is the sole general partner. VEREIT’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and its 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to VEREIT, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP.
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties. The Company classifiesactively manages its mortgage notes receivableportfolio considering a number of metrics including property type, concentration and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity.
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through the OP. VEREIT is the sole general partner and holder of 99.9% of the common equity interests in the OP as long-term investmentsof December 31, 2019. Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding common units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP Units”) or Series F Preferred Units of limited partnership interests in the OP (“Series F Preferred Units”), for a period of one year and meeting the other requirements in the LPA, unless we otherwise consent to an earlier redemption, holders have the right to redeem the units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, or, at our option, a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the LPA. The remaining rights of the holders of OP Units are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the General Partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP’s assets.
The actions of the OP and its relationship with the General Partner are governed by the LPA. The General Partner does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the OP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the General Partner and the OP are the same. Additionally, pursuant to the LPA, all administrative expenses and expenses associated with the formation, continuity, existence and operation of the General Partner incurred by the General Partner on the OP’s behalf shall be treated as expenses of the OP. Further, when the General Partner issues any equity instrument that has been approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors, the LPA requires the OP to issue to the General Partner equity instruments with substantially similar terms, to protect the integrity of the Company’s umbrella partnership REIT structure, pursuant to which each holder of interests in the OP has a proportionate economic interest in the OP reflecting its capital contributions thereto. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to the General Partner are referred to as “General Partner OP Units” and “General Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to parties other than the General Partner are referred to as “Limited Partner OP Units” and “Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. The LPA also provides that the OP issue debt with terms and provisions consistent with debt issued by the General Partner. The LPA will be amended to provide for the issuance of any additional class of equivalent equity instruments to the extent the General Partner’s Board of Directors authorizes the issuance of any new class of equity securities.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting
The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and a consolidated joint venture. The portion of the consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company is presented as non-controlling interest in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. In addition, as described in Note 1 – Organization and Note 12 – Equity, certain third parties have been issued OP Units and Series F Preferred Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Equity is reallocated between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP upon a change in ownership. At the end of each reporting period, noncontrolling interests in the OP are adjusted to reflect their ownership percentage in the OP through a reallocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP, as applicable. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were approximately 0.8 million and 23.7 million Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding, respectively, and 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding, respectively.
For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity.
The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company intendsconsolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to holdbe the mortgage notes receivableprimary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the foreseeable future or until maturity. Mortgage notes receivable investments are carried onequity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated balance sheetsfinancial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.
Reclassification
The (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net line item has been combined into other income, net for prior periods presented to be consistent with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments, real estate investment impairment, allocation of purchase price of real estate asset acquisitions and income taxes.
Real Estate Investments
The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for intangible lease assets.

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their relative fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, fixtures and improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above-market and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases. In estimating fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized cost (unpaid principal balance adjustedover the initial term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease, then the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to expense.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for unearned discount or premiumowned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and mortgage notes receivable origination fees), netmanagement’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, including any allowance for mortgage notes receivable losses. Discounts or premiums and mortgage notes receivable origination feesbargain renewal periods. Above-market leases are amortized as a component of interest income using the effective interest methodreduction to rental revenue over the liferemaining terms of the respective mortgage notes receivable. From timeleases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to time,rental revenue over the Companyremaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may determineresult in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to sellasset acquisitions were capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as described above. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Assets Held for Sale
Upon classifying a mortgage note receivable in which case it must reclassify the assetreal estate investment as held for sale. Mortgage notes receivablesale, the Company will no longer recognize depreciation expense related to the depreciable assets of the property. Assets held for sale are carriedrecorded at the lower of costcarrying value or estimated fair value.value, less the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion regarding properties held for sale.
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Company will reclassify the property as held and used. The Company also evaluatesmeasures and records a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (i) its mortgage notes receivablecarrying value before the property was classified as held for possible impairment onsale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (ii) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Development Activities
Project costs, which include interest expense, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a quarterly basis,real estate project are capitalized as discussedconstruction in Note 7progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives.

F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019Mortgage Notes Receivable(Continued)
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
Discontinued Operations
The Company classifies all of its commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) as available for sale for financial accounting purposes. Under U.S. GAAP, securities classified as available for sale are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value with the net unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),reports discontinued operations when a component of stockholders’ equity. Any premiumsan entity or discountsgroup of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on securitiesan entity’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are amortized as a component of interest income using the effective interest method.
The Company estimates fair value on all securities investments quarterly based on a variety of inputs. Under U.S. GAAP, securities where the fair value is less thanreflected in the Company’s cost are deemed impaired and, therefore, must be measuredconsolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for other-than-temporary impairment. If an impaired security (i.e., fair value is below cost) is intended to be sold or required to be sold prior to expected recovery of the impairment loss, the full amount of the loss must be recorded in earnings as an other-than-temporary impairment. Otherwise, temporary impairment losses are included in other comprehensive income (loss).
In estimating credit or other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers a variety of factors, including (1) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the credit, including credit rating of the security and the underlying tenant and an estimate of the likelihood, amount and expected timing of any default, (2) whether the Company expects to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value, (3) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below cost, (4) current market conditions, (5) expected cash flows from the underlying collateral and an estimate of underlying collateral values, and (6) subordination levels within the securitization pool. These estimates are highly subjective and could differ materially from actual results. From the period the Company acquired the CMBS through December 31, 2017, the Company had no other-than-temporary impairment losses.all periods presented. See Note 6 – Investment Securities, at Fair Value14 —Discontinued Operationsfor further discussion.discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing. Pursuant to the Company’s adoption of the FASB ASU 2015-03, Interest Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, the presentation of all deferred financing costs, other than those associated with the revolving credit facility, are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in connection with potential financial transactions that are not completed are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not be completed.
Convertible Debt
Summary and Obligations
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased $80.7 million of the 2020 Convertible Notes and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $321.8 million aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Convertible Notes outstanding. The OP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the General Partner. There were no changes to the terms of the 2020 Convertible Notes during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the 2020 Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2019.

Mortgage Notes Payable
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of $1.5 billion, which was collateralized by 355 properties, reflecting a decrease from December 31, 2018 of $388.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily related to prepayments of mortgage notes payable. Our mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the weighted-average rate of 5.05% per annum and had a weighted-average maturity of 2.8 years. We may in the future incur additional mortgage debt on the properties we currently own or use long-term non-recourse financing to acquire additional properties.
The payment terms of our loan obligations vary. In general, only interest amounts are payable monthly with all unpaid principal and interest due at maturity. Some of our loan agreements require that we comply with specific reporting and financial covenants mainly related to debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Each loan that has these requirements has specific ratio thresholds that must be met.
Restrictions on Loan Covenants
Our mortgage loan obligations generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios), as well as the maintenance of a minimum net worth. The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends as of December 31, 2019.
Derivative Activity
As discussed in Note 6 –Debt and Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million notional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, to hedge interest rate volatility. Due to an improvement in the Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company also entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 120 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments), with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt.
Dividends
On November 5, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of Common Stock (equaling an annualized dividend of $0.55 per share) for the fourth quarter of 2019 to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2019, which was paid on January 15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP Unit.
Our Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in Note 12 – Equity to our consolidated financial statements, will pay cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis).

Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Principal payments - mortgage notes $1,529,057
 $188,385
 $588,466
 $745,238
 $6,968
Interest payments - mortgage notes (1)
 210,667
 74,251
 102,135
 33,154
 1,127
Principal payments - Credit Facility 1,050,000
 
 150,000
 900,000
 
Interest payments - Credit Facility (1) (2)
 119,683
 38,281
 72,246
 9,156
 
Principal payments - corporate bonds 2,850,000
 
 
 500,000
 2,350,000
Interest payments - corporate bonds 796,198
 119,988
 239,976
 219,212
 217,022
Principal payments - convertible debt 321,802
 321,802
 
 
 
Interest payments - convertible debt 11,531
 11,531
 
 
 
Operating and ground lease commitments 334,977
 22,287
 44,406
 42,827
 225,457
Other commitments (3)
 4,345
 4,345
 
 
 
Total $7,228,260
 $780,870
 $1,197,229
 $2,449,587
 $2,800,574
____________________________________
(1)Interest payments due in future periods on the $164.4 million of variable rate debt were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.
(2)As of December 31, 2019, we had $900.0 million of variable rate debt on the Credit Facility Term Loan effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the interest rates effectively fixed under our swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(3)Includes the Company’s share of capital expenditures related to an expansion project of the property held within an unconsolidated joint venture and letters of credit outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, all letters of credit outstanding were terminated.
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in operating activities increased $601.5 million to $107.6 million from $493.9 million net cash provided by operating activities during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $524.5 million increase in litigation and non-routine costs, net, including litigation settlements, paid during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $462.1 million to $613.2 million from $151.1 million during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily related to an increase in cash proceeds from dispositions of real estate and joint ventures of $565.2 million and a decrease in investments in real estate assets of $106.0 million, offset by a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations of $122.9 million, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of CMBS and mortgage notes receivables of $37.1 million and an increase in payments for capital expenditures and leasing costs and real estate developments of $34.6 million.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $525.4 million decreased $130.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from $655.4 million during the same period in 2018. The decrease was primarily related to $1.0 billion of proceeds received from the issuance of Common Stock in 2019, offset by the redemption of $300.1 million of Series F Preferred Stock in 2019, an increase in payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs of $236.2 million, and a decrease of $170.0 million in net proceeds related to the credit facilities, corporate bonds and convertible notes. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, $192.0 million of payments were made related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units, with no comparable activity during the same period in 2018.
Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 21, 2019, for the cash flow analysis for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.


Election as a REIT
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019.
The Operating Partnership is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the Operating Partnership is required to take into account its allocable share of the Operating Partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the Operating Partnership may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property. Under the LPA, the Operating Partnership is required to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The Company conducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. However, net leases that require the tenant to pay its allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, may reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
Through the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we were contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis. For further explanation of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees see Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable-rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and forwards in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included fixed-rate debt, including debt that has interest rates that are fixed with the use of derivative instruments, with a fair value and carrying value of $5.8 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively. Changes in market interest rates on our fixed rate debt impact the fair value of the debt, but they have no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates rise 100 basis points, and the fixed rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our debt to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of $217.6 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of $236.0 million.
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included variable-rate debt with a fair value and carrying value of $164.5 million and $164.4 million, respectively. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates on our variable-rate debt would increase or decrease our interest expense by $1.6 million annually. See Note 6 –Debt to our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2019, our interest rate swaps had a fair value that resulted in net liabilities of $27.8 million. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2019, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
In July 2017, the FCA announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Company is not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. The Company has contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest amounts on our variable rate debt as discussed in Note 6 –Debt and the swap rate for our interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion on risks related to changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined, or the use of alternative reference rates.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company is subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, geographies or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this document.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
I. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the General Partner
For purposes of the discussion in this Part I of Item 9A, the “Company” refers to the General Partner.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
II. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the Operating Partnership
In the information incorporated by reference into this Part II of Item 9A, the term “Company” refers to the Operating Partnership, except as the context otherwise requires.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020



Item 9B. Other Information.
None

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item will be included in our Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
The Financial Statements are included herein at pages F-1 through F-59.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included herein on page F-60.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included herein on pages F-61 through F-178.
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans Held for Investment is included herein on page F-179.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No.Description
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
4.1
4.2
4.3

Exhibit No.Description
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20*
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4†
10.5†
10.6†
10.7†
10.8†
10.9†

Exhibit No.Description
10.10†
10.11†
10.12†
10.13†
10.14†
10.15†
10.16†
10.17†
10.18†
10.19†
10.20†
10.21†
10.22†
10.23†
10.24†
10.25†
10.26†
10.27†
10.28†
10.29†
10.30

Exhibit No.Description
10.31
21.1*
23.1*
23.2*
31.1*
31.2*
31.3*
31.4*
32.1**
32.2**
32.3**
32.4**
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101.*).
_____________________________
*Filed herewith
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not Applicable


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VEREIT, INC.
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By: VEREIT, Inc., its sole general partner
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 25, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameCapacity *Date
/s/ Glenn J. RufranoChief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Glenn J. Rufrano(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
/s/ Michael J. BartolottaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Michael J. Bartolotta(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Gavin B. BrandonSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Gavin B. Brandon(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Hugh R. FraterDirector, Non-Executive ChairmanFebruary 25, 2020
Hugh R. Frater
/s/ David B. HenryDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
David B. Henry
/s/ Mary Hogan PreusseDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mary Hogan Preusse
/s/ Richard J. LiebDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Richard J. Lieb
/s/ Mark S. OrdanDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mark S. Ordan
/s/ Eugene A. PinoverDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Eugene A. Pinover
/s/ Julie G. RichardsonDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Julie G. Richardson

*Each person is signing in his or her capacity as an officer and/or director of VEREIT, Inc., which is the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Investments - Impairments- Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered from the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. Estimating future undiscounted cash flows requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimating the expected holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability.
In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the carrying value of real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. During 2019, the Company recorded $47.1 million of impairment charges.

We identified the impairment of real estate assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions required to evaluate the recoverability of real estate assets, including the estimated holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability. Auditing the assumptions used by the Company in estimating future undiscounted cash flows required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the Company’s recoverability analysis.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures to test the assumptions used by management to estimate forecasted cash flows, including management’s expected holding period of such real estate assets, consisted of the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over the inputs of the forecasted cash flows used in the recoverability analysis.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the undiscounted future cash flows analysis, including estimates of future occupancy levels, market rental revenue, and capitalization rates, in addition to the assessment of expected remaining holding period and changes in management’s intent with respect to the expected holding period for each real estate asset with possible impairment indicators by:
1.Making inquiries of accounting and operations management.
2.Comparing the source data and management’s assumptions to the Company’s historical results and external market sources.
3.Testing the mathematical accuracy of the undiscounted future cash flows analysis.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the partners of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P and subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.


F-4

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)


  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870
 15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623
 12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 

 


Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 309
 428
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 10,768
 9,675
Additional paid-in capital 13,251,962
 12,615,472
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (27,670) (1,280)
Accumulated deficit (6,399,626) (5,467,236)
Total stockholders’ equity 6,835,743
 7,157,059
Non-controlling interests 7,535
 143,085
Total equity 6,843,278
 7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254

996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net
11,752

(164,237)
(197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes
(302,844)
(86,624)
58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106)
(91,725)
51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106) (88,030) 32,378
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 6,753
 2,256
 (560)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(300,353)
$(85,774)
$31,818
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-6

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income (27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income (334,543) (85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests(1)
 7,800
 2,200
 (534)
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(326,743) $(83,485) $30,805

(1)Represents comprehensive loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-7

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for share data)

  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,146,650
 $9,741
 $12,640,171
 $(2,556) $(4,200,423) $8,447,361
 $172,172
 $8,619,533
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (68,759) (1) (517) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,550) (2) (2,146) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 399,242
 4
 16,750
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) (535,657) 
 (535,657)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,227) (13,227)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 (571) (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 31,818
 560
 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (1,013) (26) (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,208,583
 $9,742
 $12,654,258
 $(3,569) $(4,776,581) $7,884,278
 $158,598
 $8,042,876
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 32,439
 
 241
 
 
 241
 (241) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (7,206,876) (72) (50,082) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (324,502) (2) (2,324) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 805,521
 7
 13,307
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) (532,144) 
 (532,144)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,048) (13,048)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 72
 
 (989) (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) (85,774) (2,256) (88,030)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 2,289
 56
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138
 $428
 967,515,165
 $9,675
 $12,615,472
 $(1,280) $(5,467,236) $7,157,059
 $143,085
 $7,300,144
Issuance of Common Stock, net 
 
 108,410,070
 1,084
 1,013,131
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 130,291
 1
 1,166
 
 
 1,167
 (1,167) 


F-8

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for share data)


  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Conversion of Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 $1
 
 $
 $922
 $
 $
 $923
 $(923) $
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (120) 
 
 (300,002) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (200,331) (2) (1,616) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 990,789
 10
 13,091
 
 
 13,101
 
 13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) (562,195) 
 (562,195)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,494) (9,494)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 117
 
 (1,445) (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (68,397) (68,397) (91) (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 (91,920) 
 
 (91,920) (126,590) (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of equity 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 
 2,071
 (2,071) 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) (300,353) (6,753) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (26,390) (1,047) (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246

$309

1,076,845,984

$10,768

$13,251,962

$(27,670)
$(6,399,626)
$6,835,743

$7,535

$6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-9

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:    
  
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity-based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities and gain on joint venture (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603) 493,914

793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119

(274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-10

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398) (655,406)
(756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663

$61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-11

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870

15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623

12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 


 


General Partner's preferred equity, 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 General Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 460,504
 710,325
General Partner's common equity, 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 6,375,239
 6,446,734
Limited Partner's preferred equity, 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 1,869
 2,883
Limited Partner's common equity, 786,719 and 23,715,908 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 4,433
 138,931
Total partners’ equity 6,842,045

7,298,873
Non-controlling interests 1,233
 1,271
Total equity 6,843,278

7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-12

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per unit data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254
 996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net 11,752

(164,237) (197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes (302,844)
(86,624) 58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106) (91,725) 51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106)
(88,030) 32,378
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP $(307,004)
$(87,876) $32,572
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-13

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income
(334,543)
(85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the OP
$(334,441)
$(85,531) $31,533

(1)Represents comprehensive loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-14

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $853,821
 86,874
 $3,171
 974,146,650
 $7,593,540
 23,748,347
 $166,598

$8,617,130
 $2,403

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (68,759) (518) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,550) (2,148) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 399,242
 16,754
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) 
 (13,060) (548,717) (167) (548,884)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (571) 
 
 (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 
 754
 32,572
 (194) 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (26) (1,039) 
 (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138

$782,073

86,874

$3,027

974,208,583

$7,102,205

23,748,347

$154,266

$8,041,571

$1,305

$8,042,876
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 32,439
 241
 (32,439) (241) 
 
 
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (7,206,876) (50,154) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (324,502) (2,326) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 805,521
 13,314
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) 
 (13,048) (545,192) 
 (545,192)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (917) 
 
 (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) 
 (2,102) (87,876) (154) (88,030)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 56
 2,345
 
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138

$710,325

86,874

$2,883

967,515,165

$6,446,734

23,715,908

$138,931

$7,298,873

$1,271

$7,300,144
Issuance of common OP Units, net 
 
 
 
 108,410,070
 1,014,215
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 130,291
 1,167
 (130,291) (1,167) 
 
 
Conversion of Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 923
 (37,108) (923) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (182,347) 
 
 
 (117,775) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (200,331) (1,618) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)


F-15

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Equity-based compensation, net 
 $
 
 $
 990,789
 $13,101
 
 $
 $13,101
 $
 $13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) 
 (9,494) (571,689) 
 (571,689)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (1,328) 
 
 (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (68,397) 
 (91) 
 
 
 
 (68,488) 
 (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
 
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 
 (91,920) (22,798,898) (126,590) (218,510) 
 (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of capital 
 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 (2,071) 
 
 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) 
 (6,651) (307,004) (102) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (1,047) (27,437) 
 (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246
 $460,504
 49,766
 $1,869
 1,076,845,984
 $6,375,239
 786,719
 $4,433
 $6,842,045
 $1,233
 $6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-16

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603)
493,914
 793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119
 (274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-17

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398)
(655,406) (756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019


Note 1 – Organization
VEREIT is a Maryland corporation, incorporated on December 2, 2010, that qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. The OP is a Delaware limited partnership of which the General Partner is the sole general partner. VEREIT’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and its 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to VEREIT, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP.
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties. The Company actively manages its portfolio considering a number of metrics including property type, concentration and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity.
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through the OP. VEREIT is the sole general partner and holder of 99.9% of the common equity interests in the OP as of December 31, 2019. Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding common units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP Units”) or Series F Preferred Units of limited partnership interests in the OP (“Series F Preferred Units”), for a period of one year and meeting the other requirements in the LPA, unless we otherwise consent to an earlier redemption, holders have the right to redeem the units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, or, at our option, a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the LPA. The remaining rights of the holders of OP Units are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the General Partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP’s assets.
The actions of the OP and its relationship with the General Partner are governed by the LPA. The General Partner does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the OP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the General Partner and the OP are the same. Additionally, pursuant to the LPA, all administrative expenses and expenses associated with the formation, continuity, existence and operation of the General Partner incurred by the General Partner on the OP’s behalf shall be treated as expenses of the OP. Further, when the General Partner issues any equity instrument that has been approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors, the LPA requires the OP to issue to the General Partner equity instruments with substantially similar terms, to protect the integrity of the Company’s umbrella partnership REIT structure, pursuant to which each holder of interests in the OP has a proportionate economic interest in the OP reflecting its capital contributions thereto. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to the General Partner are referred to as “General Partner OP Units” and “General Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to parties other than the General Partner are referred to as “Limited Partner OP Units” and “Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. The LPA also provides that the OP issue debt with terms and provisions consistent with debt issued by the General Partner. The LPA will be amended to provide for the issuance of any additional class of equivalent equity instruments to the extent the General Partner’s Board of Directors authorizes the issuance of any new class of equity securities.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting
The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and a consolidated joint venture. The portion of the consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company is presented as non-controlling interest in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. In addition, as described in Note 1 – Organization and Note 12 – Equity, certain third parties have been issued OP Units and Series F Preferred Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Equity is reallocated between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP upon a change in ownership. At the end of each reporting period, noncontrolling interests in the OP are adjusted to reflect their ownership percentage in the OP through a reallocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP, as applicable. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were approximately 0.8 million and 23.7 million Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding, respectively, and 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding, respectively.
For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity.
The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.
Reclassification
The (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net line item has been combined into other income, net for prior periods presented to be consistent with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments, real estate investment impairment, allocation of purchase price of real estate asset acquisitions and income taxes.
Real Estate Investments
The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for intangible lease assets.

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their relative fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, fixtures and improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above-market and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases. In estimating fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the initial term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease, then the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to expense.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, including any bargain renewal periods. Above-market leases are amortized as a reduction to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may result in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions were capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as described above. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Assets Held for Sale
Upon classifying a real estate investment as held for sale, the Company will no longer recognize depreciation expense related to the depreciable assets of the property. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion regarding properties held for sale.
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Company will reclassify the property as held and used. The Company measures and records a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (i) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (ii) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Development Activities
Project costs, which include interest expense, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives.

F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Discontinued Operations
The Company reports discontinued operations when a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 14 —Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financing policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the joint ventures’ earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the unconsolidated joint ventures in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Investment in Cole REITs
On February 1, 2018, the Company sold certain of its equity investments to CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC, retaining interests retaining interests in Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”). Subsequent to the sale of Cole Capital, the Company carries these investments at fair value, as the Company does not exert significant influence over CCIT II, CCIT III or CCPT V, and any changes in the fair value are recognized in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.Prior to the sale of Cole Capital, the Company accounted for these investments using the equity method of accounting, which required the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the respective Cole REIT’s earnings and distributions. The Company recorded its proportionate share of net income or loss from the Cole REITs in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
The Company leases its corporate office facilities under operating leases. Leasehold improvements related to these are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life or remaining lease term.
Property and equipment, which typically include computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, among other items, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. The Company reassesses the useful lives of its property and equipment and adjusts the future monthly depreciation expense based on the new useful life, as applicable. If the Company disposes of an asset, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are written off upon disposal.
Goodwill
In the case of a business combination, after identifying all tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, the excess consideration paid over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and assumed, respectively, represents goodwill. In connection with prior mergers, the Company recorded goodwill as a result of the merger consideration exceeding the net assets acquired. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of goodwill was $1.3 billion.

F-22

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Impairments
Real Estate Assets
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators that the Company considers include, but are not limited to, decrease in net operating income, bankruptcy or other credit concerns of a property’s major tenant or tenants, such as history of late payments, rental concessions and other factors, as well as significant decreases in a property’s revenues due to lease terminations, vacancies, co-tenancy clauses or reduced lease rates. When impairment indicators are identified or if a property is considered to have a more likely than not probability of being disposed of within the next 12 to 24 months, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. U.S. GAAP requires us to utilize the Company’s expected holding period of our properties when assessing recoverability. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales or leasing transactions. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of real estate assets are discussed in Note 5 – Fair Value Measures.
Goodwill
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. To determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test, the Company first assesses qualitative factors, including, but not limited to macro-economic conditions such as deterioration in the entity's operating environment or industry or market considerations; entity-specific events such as increasing costs, declining financial performance, or loss of key personnel; or other events such as an expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or a sustained decrease in the stock price on either an absolute basis or relative to peers. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50% chance) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no quantitative testing is required. If it is determined, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, the provisions of guidance require that the Company then compares the fair value to the carrying value. Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying value exceeds the fair value.
The Company performed the annual qualitative assessment for goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2019. As a result of the qualitative testing, the Company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the goodwill is greater than the carrying value. As such, no further testing was performed. The Company performed a quantitative analysis for the annual goodwill tests during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, which also resulted in 0 impairments.
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company is required to determine whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of any of its investment in the unconsolidated joint ventures. If an event or change in circumstance has occurred, the Company is required to evaluate its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture for potential impairment and determine if the carrying value of its investment exceeds its fair value. An impairment charge is recorded when an impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. The evaluation of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. NaN impairments of unconsolidated joint ventures were identified during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
Leasehold improvements and property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If this review indicates that the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, the Company records an impairment loss, measured at fair value by estimated discounted cash flows or market appraisals. The evaluation of leasehold improvements and property and equipment for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. NaN impairments of leasehold improvements and property and equipment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

F-23

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts, as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. The Company deposits cash with several high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit of $250,000. At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured levels. Although the Company bears risk on amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it has not experienced and does not anticipate any losses due to the high quality of the institutions where the deposits are held.
Restricted Cash
The Company had $21.0 million and $22.9 million, respectively, in restricted cash as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Restricted cash primarily consists of reserves related to lease expirations, as well as maintenance, structural and debt service reserves. In accordance with certain debt agreements, rent from certain of the Company’s tenants is deposited directly into a lockbox account, from which the monthly debt service payments are disbursed to the lender and the excess funds are then disbursed to the Company. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2019 was $18.8 million in lender reserves and $2.2 million held in restricted lockbox accounts. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2018 was $21.5 million in lender reserves and $1.4 million held in restricted lockbox accounts.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing. Deferred financing costs, other than those associated with the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6 –Debt), are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Deferred financing costs related to the Revolving Credit Facility are included in rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in connection with potential financial transactions that are not completed are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not be completed.
Convertible Debt
The Company has an outstanding aggregate balance of $1.0 billion$321.8 million related to the 2020 Convertible Notes (as defined in Note 10 –Debt).6 –Debt ). The 2020 Convertible Notes are convertible into cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the Company’s option. In accordance with U.S GAAP, the 2020 Convertible Notes are accounted for as a liability with a separate equity component recorded for the conversion option. A liability was recorded for the 2020 Convertible Notes on the respective issuance date at fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current market rates for debt instruments with similar terms. The difference between the initial proceeds from the 2020 Convertible Notes and the estimated fair value of the debt instruments resulted in a debt discount, with an offset recorded to additional paid-in capital representing the equity component. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense over the respective term of the 2020 Convertible Notes.

F-23

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Derivative Instruments
The Company may use derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and forwards to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings. CertainThe Company’s interest rate management objectives are intended to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to manage the techniquesCompany’s overall borrowing costs. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges are used to hedge exposureforecasted issuances of fixed rate debt and the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt. The Company does not intend to utilize derivatives for purposes other than interest rate fluctuationsrisk management. The use of derivative financial instruments carries certain risks, including the risk that the counterparties to these contractual arrangements are not able to perform under the agreements. To mitigate this risk, the Company only enters into derivative financial instruments with counterparties with high credit ratings and with major financial institutions with which the Company may also be usedhave other financial relationships. The Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to protect against declines in the market valuemeet their obligations.

F-24

Table of assets that result from general trends in debt markets. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company’s operatingContents
VEREIT, INC. and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.
The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether each has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. If the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting treatment, any changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized immediately in loss on derivative instruments,other income, net in the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). If the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, the change in the estimated fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized gains and losses in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to interest expense when the extentrelated hedged items impact earnings. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities for further discussion.
Leases
ASC 842 (effective January 1, 2019)
The adoption of ASC 842, effective January 1, 2019, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The most significant impact was the recognition of operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee. The Company did not have a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The lessor accounting model under ASC 842 is similar to existing guidance, however, it limits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, such as internally generated costs, and modifies the lease classification criteria through the elimination of "bright-line" tests.
The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under ASC 842 (which included: (i) an entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) an entity need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (iii) an entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases), the land easement practical expedient to carry forward existing accounting treatment on existing land easements, the practical expedient which allows a lessee to combine lease and non-lease components, and the short-term lease election that it is effective. Any ineffective portionallows a lessee not to apply the balance sheet recognition requirements to leases with a term of 12 months or less. The Company elected not to apply the practical expedients related to hindsight or assessing impairment of ROU assets.
Lessor (effective January 1, 2019)
At the inception of a derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Revenue Recognition – Real Estate
The Company’s revenues, which primarily consist of rental incomenew lease arrangement, including new leases that arise from amendments, the Company assesses the terms and include rents that each tenant pays in accordance withconditions to determine the proper lease classification. When the terms of eacha lease reportedeffectively transfer control of the underlying asset, the lease is classified as a sales-type lease. When a lease does not effectively transfer control of the underlying asset to the lessee, but the Company obtains a guarantee for the value of the asset from a third party, the Company classifies the lease as a direct financing lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company has acquired certain properties that are subject to leases that qualified as direct financing leases. Investments in direct financing leases represent the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term. The fair value of the remaining lease payments is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates that would represent the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt. The expected residual property value at the end of the lease term is estimated using market data and assessments of the remaining useful lives of the properties at the end of the lease terms, among other factors. Income from direct financing leases is calculated using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the lease. The Company does not have any sales-type leases as of December 31, 2019.
For operating leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis, including the effect of any free rent periods, over the initial non-cancelablelease term when collectability of lease payments is probable. Variable lease payments are recognized as rental revenue in the period when the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. Variable lease payments, including contingent rent, which is paid by a tenant when the tenant's sales exceed an agreed upon minimum amount, are recognized once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds and is calculated by multiplying the sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease.

F-25

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The Company, as lessor, identified three separate lease components as follows: i) land lease component, ii) single property lease component comprised of building, land improvements and tenant improvements, and iii) furniture and fixtures. The Company’s leases also contain provisions for tenants to reimburse the Company for real estate taxes and insurance, which are considered noncomponents of the lease, are recognized when earned and collectability is reasonably assured. When the Company acquires amaintenance and other property the term of each existing lease isoperating expenses, which are considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. Since many of the leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting requires the Company to record a receivable, and include in revenues, straight-line rent receivables that the Company will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. Straight-line rent receivables are included in rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net, in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 – Rent and Tenant Receivables and Other Assets, Net. Cost recoveries from tenants are included in operating expense reimbursements in the consolidated statements of operations in the period the related costs are incurred.be non-lease components. The Company deferselected the revenue relatedpractical expedient to combine lease payments received from tenants in advance of their due dates. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,non-lease components and the Company had $56.6 million and $57.6 million, respectively, of deferred rental income, which isnon-lease components will be included in deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities inwith the consolidated balance sheets.single property lease component as the predominant component.
The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent, straight-line rent and unbilled rent receivablesproperty operating expense reimbursements and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. InThe review includes a binary assessment of whether or not substantially all of the eventamounts due under a tenant’s lease agreement are probable of collection. For leases that are deemed probable of collection, revenue continues to be recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For leases that are deemed not probable of collection, revenue is recorded as cash is received. The Company recognizes all changes in the collectability of a receivable is uncertain, the Company will recordassessment for an increase in the allowance for uncollectible accounts in the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of operationsoperating lease as a reductionan adjustment to rental income. As of December 31, 2017income and December 31, 2016, the Company maintaineddoes not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $6.9 million and $6.0 million, respectively.accounts.
The Company owns certain properties that have associated leases that requireRental revenue also includes lease termination income collected from tenants to allow for the tenant to pay contingent rental incomevacate their space prior to their scheduled termination dates, as well as amortization of above and below-market leases.
Lessee (effective January 1, 2019)
To account for leases for which the Company is the lessee, contracts must be analyzed upon inception to determine if the arrangement is, or contains, a lease. A lease conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Lease classification tests and measurement procedures are performed at the lease commencement date.
The lease liability is initially measured as the present value of the lease payments over the lease term, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate is readily determinable; otherwise, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used. The incremental borrowing rate is determined based on the estimated rate of interest that the lessee would pay to borrow on a percentagecollateralized basis over a similar term at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. The lease term is the noncancelable period of the tenant’s sales after the achievement of certain sales thresholds, which may be monthly, quarterly or annual targets. As a lessor,lease and includes any renewal and termination options the Company defersis reasonably certain to exercise. The lease liability balance is amortized using the recognitioneffective interest method. The lease liability is remeasured when the contract is modified, upon the resolution of contingent rental income untila contingency such that variable payments become fixed or if the specified targetassessment of exercising an extension, termination or purchase option changes.
The ROU asset balance is initially measured as the lease liability amount, adjusted for any lease payments made prior to the commencement date, initial direct costs, estimated costs to dismantle, remove, or restore the underlying asset and incentives received.
The Company’s impairment assessment for ROU assets is consistent with the impairment analysis for the Company's other long-lived assets and is reviewed quarterly.
Policy applicable to periods prior to January 1, 2019
The accounting policy for leases in which the Company is the lessor or lessee prior to the adoption of ASC 842 can be found in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize revenue in a way that triggersdepicts the contingent rental income is achieved,transfer of promised goods or until such sales uponservices to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which percentage rent is basedthe entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenues generated through leasing arrangements are known.within the scope of ASC 842, as discussed above, and are excluded from Topic 606.

Revenue Recognition - Cole Capital
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The assets, liabilities and related financial results of substantially all of the Cole Capital segment are reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations.

F-24F-26

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Revenue Recognition – Cole Capital
Revenue included earned securities sales commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution and stockholder servicing fees, real estate acquisition fees, financing coordination fees, property management fees, advisory fees, asset management fees and performance fees for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment and management of their respective assets, in accordance with the respective dealer manager and advisory agreements. The Company recorded dealer manager fees, excluding those related to INAV, and securities sales commissions as revenue upon the sale of Cole REIT shares. Dealer manager fees from the sale of INAV shares and distribution and stockholder servicing fees were recorded as revenue when the fees were fixed or determinable. The Company recorded revenue related to acquisition and financing coordination fees upon completion of a transaction and advisory, asset and property management fees as services were performed. The Company was also reimbursed for certain costs incurred in providing these services. Securities sales commissions and dealer manager reimbursementsservices, which were recorded as revenue as the expenses were incurred as long as reimbursementsubject to revenue constraint due to the limitations on the amount that was reasonably assured. The Company, in its sole discretion, could reallow all or a portionreimbursable based on the terms of itsthe respective dealer manager fee to such participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement, based on factors such as the volume of shares issued by such participating broker-dealers and the amount of marketing support provided by such participating broker-dealers. The Company also reallowed 100%of selling commissions earned to participating broker-dealers.advisory agreements. Refer to Note 1715Related Party Transactions and Arrangementsfor further discussion.
Asa disaggregation of December 31, 2017, these revenues are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 —Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Program Development CostsCole Capital revenues.
The Company paid for organization, registration and offering expenses associatedentered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with the sale of common stock ofCole Purchaser, pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole REITs. The reimbursement of these expenses byPurchaser and the Cole REITs, was limited to a certain percentageincluding operational real estate support, (“Transition Services Revenues”) through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the proceeds raised from their offerings, in accordance with their respective advisory agreements and charters. Such expenses paidlast government filing other than a tax filing made by the Company on behalfany of the Cole REITs in excesswith respect to its 2018 fiscal year). Under the terms of these limits that were expectedthe Services Agreement, the Company will be entitled to be collected were recorded as program development costs.receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided. The Company assessedrecorded Transition Services Revenues as costs associated with providing such services were incurred, which coincided with the collectabilitytiming in which the performance obligations of the program development costs, considering the offering period and historical and forecasted sales of shares under the Cole REITs’ respective offerings and reserved for any balances considered not collectible. Additional reserves were generally recorded if actual proceeds raised from the offerings and corresponding program development costs incurred differed from management’s assumptions.
As of December 31, 2017, program development costs are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 —Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Acquisition-Related Expenses and Litigation, Merger and Other Non-routine Costs, Net of Insurance Recoveries
contract had been met. During the year ended December 31, 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions,2019 the Company incurred $2.1 million of such costs and externalrecognized revenues of $2.4 million, including acquisition fees, and during the period from February 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, the Company incurred $15.0 million of such costs related to these asset acquisitions were capitalized. Prior to the Company’s adoptionand recognized revenues of ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, external costs related to real estate acquisitions were expensed as incurred. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations$15.0 million, which are classified as acquisition-related expensesrecorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Any costs incurred as a result of a business combination will be classified as acquisition-related expenses or other non-routine transaction related expenses and expensed as incurred.
External acquisition-related costs incurred in relation to prior mergers and litigation resulting therefrom are included in litigation and other non-routine costs,income, net of insurance recoveries in the consolidated statementsstatement of operations. The Company may also earn additional fees in each calendar year through December 31, 2023 if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold in a calendar year (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
Litigation and non-routine costs, net
The Company has also incurred legal fees and other costs associated with litigations and investigations resulting from the Audit Committee Investigation (defined below) and the litigations and investigations resulting therefrom,, which are considered non-routine. The Company has directors’ and officers’ insurance and theCompany’s insurance carriers have paid certain defense costs subject to standard reservation of rights under the respective policies.

F-25

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.Litigation and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Litigation, merger and other non-routine costs, net of insurance recoveries include the following costs and recoveries (amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Merger Related Costs:      
Transfer taxes(1)
 $(1,595) $562
 $(2,509)
Litigation and other non-routine costs:      
Audit Committee Investigation and related matters (2)
 49,434
 24,207
 44,242
Legal fees and expenses (3)
 421
 311
 2,704
Other fees and expenses 
 
 632
Total costs incurred 48,260

25,080
 45,069
Insurance recoveries (300) (21,196) (11,441)
Total $47,960
 $3,884
 $33,628
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Litigation and non-routine costs, net:      
Audit Committee Investigation and related matters (1)
 $70,168
 $59,755
 $49,434
Legal fees and expenses (2)
 2
 530
 421
Litigation settlements (3)
 820,208
 233,246
 
Merger related transfer taxes(4)
 
 
 (1,595)
Total costs 890,378

293,531

48,260
Insurance recoveries (5)
 (48,420) (2,568) (300)
Other recoveries (6)
 (26,536) 
 
Total $815,422
 $290,963
 $47,960

___________________________________
(1)Includes all fees and costs associated with various litigations and investigations prompted by the results of the 2014 investigation conducted by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”), including fees and costs incurred pursuant to the Company’s advancement obligations, litigation related thereto and in connection with related insurance recovery matters, net of accrual reversals.
(2)Includes legal fees and expenses associated with litigation resulting from prior mergers and excludes amounts presented in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
(3)Refer to Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.
(4)The negative balance for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2015 areis a result of estimated costs accrued in prior periods that exceeded actual expenses incurred.
(2)(5)Includes all fees and costs associated with$2.3 million during the previously-announced investigation conducted by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s board of directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”) and various litigations and investigations prompted by the results of the Audit Committee Investigation, including fees and costs incurred pursuantyear ended December 31, 2018 relates to the Company’s advancement obligations, litigation related there to and in connection with related insurance recovery matters.resulting from prior mergers.
(3)(6)Includes legal fees and expenses associated with litigation resulting from prior mergers.Represents the surrender of 2.9 million Limited Partner OP Units. Refer to Note 12 – Equity for additional information.


Due from Affiliates
F-27

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Loss Contingencies
The Company received compensation and reimbursement for services primarily relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment, management, financing and disposition of their respective assets. Refer to Note 17 – Related Party Transactions and Arrangements for further explanation. The amounts presentedrecords a liability in the consolidated balance sheets are receivables that will be settled directly withfinancial statements for loss contingencies when a loss is known or considered probable and the respective Cole REITsamount is reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of a known or probable loss is a range, and wereno amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount of the range is accrued. If a material loss is reasonably possible but not transferred pursuantknown or probable, and is reasonably estimable, the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement.estimated loss or range of loss is disclosed. 
Equity-based Compensation
The Company has an equity-based incentive award plan (the “Equity Plan”) for non-executive directors, officers, other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under U.S. GAAP for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met. See Note 16 –13– Equity-based Compensation for additional information on these plans.
Restructuring
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s obligation to provide certain initial transition services for the Cole Purchaser terminated in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement and the Company recorded $10.5 million of restructuring expenses related to the reorganization of its business, of which $9.2 million related to office lease terminations and modifications and $1.8 million related to the cessation of services under the Services Agreement, including severance, net of ASC 842 operating lease adjustments of $0.5 million. NaN restructuring expenses were recorded prior to January 1, 2019 in connection with the sale.
Per Share Data
Income (loss) per basic share of Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) less dividends on unvested restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”) and dividends on preferred stock by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted income (loss) per share of Common Stock considers the effect of potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period.
Reportable Segments
Prior to the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company operated through two business segments, the real estate investment segment and the investment management segment, Cole Capital. On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell substantially all of the Cole Capital segment. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.

F-26

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Income Taxes
The General Partner currently qualifies and has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code.Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner is generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even ifHowever, the General Partner, maintains its qualification for taxation as ataxable REIT it may besubsidiaries (“TRS”) entities, and the OP are still subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, franchise and property taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. The General Partner may also be subject to federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
The OP is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the OP is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the OP is required to take into accountinclude its allocable share of the OP’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the OP may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property.
As of December 31, 2017, the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the OP, the General Partner, American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. (“ARCT III”), CapLease, Inc. (“CapLease”), American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., (“ARCT IV”), Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc. (“Cole”) and Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. are subject.
Under the LPA, the OP is to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
The Company conducted substantially all of its Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conductsconducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS until it sold the Cole Capital business on February 1, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company conducted all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and Canada and, as a result, it filesfiled income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Canadian federal jurisdictionPuerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to routine examinations by taxing authorities for years before 2015. Certain of the Company’s inter-companyintercompany transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation. The provision for or benefit from income taxes attributable to Cole Capital are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 —Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with current authoritative accounting and tax guidance. The tax provision or benefit related to significant or unusual items is recognized in the quarter in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the quarter in which the change occurs. The accounting

F-28

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

estimates used to compute the provision for or benefit from income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized state and local income and franchise tax expense of $4.3 million, $4.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively, which are included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company recorded a provision for federal income taxes of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to a TRS entity, which is also included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. NaN provision for federal income taxes related to a TRS entity was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2017. The provision for or benefit from income taxes attributable to the Cole Capital business, substantially all of which was conducted through a TRS entity, is included in discontinued operations for all periods presented, as discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations.
The Company had 0 unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019, the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition, Accounting Standards Codification  (“ASC”) (Topic 605) and will require an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For public business entities, the guidance should be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach, which  requires applying the new standard to all existing contracts not yet completed as of the effective date and recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company plans to use the modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. Once ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which, as discussed below, sets forth principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, goes into effect, ASU 2014-09 may apply to non-lease components in the lease agreements. In January 2018, the FASB proposed amending Topic 842 to allow lessors the option to combine lease and non-lease components when certain criteria are met. The Company has completed its evaluation of the standard’s impact on the Company’s revenue streams and does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

F-27

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which will require that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability and the disclosure of key information about the entity’s leasing arrangements. The lessor accounting model under ASU 2016-02 is similar to current guidance, however it limits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, such as internally generated costs. ASU 2016-02 retains a distinction between finance leases (i.e., capital leases under current U.S. GAAP) and operating leases. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases will be substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases under current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required for existing leases that have not expired upon adoption and provides for certain practical expedients. The Company’s implementation team has developed an inventory of all leases and is identifying any non-lease components in the lease agreements and is evaluating the impact to the Company, both as lessor and lessee, and its consolidated financial statements. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company will record certain expenses paid directly by a tenant that protect the Company’s interests in its properties, such as real estate taxes, and the related operating expense reimbursement revenue, with no impact on net income. The Company currently does not record such expenses and the related operating expenses reimbursement revenues. The Company expects the accounting for leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee to change and is currently evaluating the impact. Leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee primarily consist of corporate offices and ground leases.Instruments - Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance, intended to clarify and improve certain topics, under ASU 2016-13”)2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05 and ASU 2019-11 (collectively Topic 326). ASU 2016-13Topic 326 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other such commitments. ASU 2016-13 requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-13Topic 326 require the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminates the “incurred loss” methodology under current U.S. GAAP. ASU 2016-13The effective date for Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years and(including the interim periods within,therein) beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoptionTopic 326 must be adopted by applying a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within, beginning after December 15, 2018.effective. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this amendmentdoes not expect Topic 326 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which is intended to address diversity in practice related to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with earlystatements upon adoption permitted, and requires retrospective adoption unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it is to be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 during the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal year 2017 and determined that this standard impacts the Company’s classification of proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims and distributions received from equity method investments. Following the retrospective adoption of this standard, the Company reclassified $2.6 million and $6.5 million of distributions received from equity method investments from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company also reclassified $0.8 million of proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015.2020.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In accordance with ASU 2016-18, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The amendments of ASU 2016-18 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 during the fourth quarter of 2017 and applied the standard retrospectively for all periods presented. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company included restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows and removed the change in restricted cash from cash flows from investing activities. This change resulted in a decrease in cash flows from investing activities of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 and an increase of $1.5 million in cash flows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-18, the Company also included $3.6 million and $4.4 million, during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of restricted cash outflows within the “payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment and swap termination costs’’ line item within cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.


F-28F-29

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be applied prospectively to any transactions occurring within the period of adoption. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2017. As the Company expects that a majority of its real estate acquisitions will be considered asset acquisitions, external acquisition costs related to these asset acquisitions will be capitalized. Prior to 2017, all acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred. The adoption of this pronouncement resulted in capitalization of $3.3 million of external acquisitions-related costs during the year ended December 31, 2017. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-01, the Company's real estate dispositions qualify as asset dispositions and as such, no portion of the Company’s goodwill was allocated to the cost basis of these assets in determining the gain or loss on disposition of real estate and held for sale assets. Prior to January 1, 2017, when the Company disposed of a property or classified a property as held for sale, it constituted a business per U.S. GAAP and the Company allocated a portion of goodwill to the cost basis of that property in determining the gain or loss on the disposition of real estate and held for sale assets.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test (comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill). ASU 2017-04 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard is applied prospectively and may result in a different impairment charge as compared to the existing standard. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 during the fourth quarter of 2017. ASU 2017-04 had no impact on the 2017 annual impairment test. Refer to “Note 3Goodwill” for discussion regarding goodwill and “Note 9 – Fair Value Measures” regarding the annual goodwill impairment test.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASU 2017-05”), which clarifies the following: 1) nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty; 2) an entity should allocate consideration to each distinct asset by applying the guidance in Topic 606 on allocating the transaction price to performance obligations; and 3) requires entities to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial sale transaction when it (a) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset in accordance with Subtopic 810 and (b) transfers control of the asset in accordance with Topic 606. The adoption of this standard will result in higher gains on the sale of partial real estate interests, including contributions of nonfinancial assets to a joint venture or other noncontrolling investee, due to recognizing the full gain when the derecognition criteria are met and recording the retained noncontrolling interest at its fair value. ASU 2017-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard is applied prospectively to sales of nonfinancial assets on or after the adoption date. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-09 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The standard is applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-09 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The targeted amendments in this ASU help simplify certain aspects of hedge accounting and result in a more accurate portrayal of the economics of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. This ASU applies to the Company’s interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges. Upon adoption of this ASU, all changes in the fair value of highly effective cash flow hedges will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income rather than recognized directly in earnings. Under current U.S. GAAP, the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedges is recognized directly in earnings. This eliminates the requirement to separately measure and disclose ineffectiveness for qualifying cash flow hedges. ASU 2017-12 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The ASU is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

F-29

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 3 – Goodwill
In connection with prior mergers, the Company recorded goodwill as a result of the merger consideration exceeding the net assets acquired. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying value of goodwill was $1.3 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2017, one property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 was classified as held and used, resulting in an increase to the goodwill allocated to the real estate investment reporting unit of $0.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company allocated $73.2 million of goodwill to dispositions and held for sale assets, which included $2.3 million of goodwill allocated to the cost basis of two properties foreclosed upon as discussed in Note 10 –Debt. The allocated goodwill of $73.2 million was included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The analysis performed for the annual goodwill tests during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 resulted in no impairment charges. See Note 9 – Fair Value Measures for a discussion of the Company’s fair value measurements regarding goodwill. Goodwill related to discontinued operations is discussed in Note 5 —Discontinued Operations.
Note 4 – 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles
Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company acquired controlling financial interests in 66 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $403.6 million (the “2019 Acquisitions”), which includes $2.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized. Additionally, the Company placed in service 1 build-to-suit development project in which the Company invested $27.6 million, including $0.7 million of external acquisition-related expenses and interest that were capitalized and including the land parcel acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired a controlling interest in 52 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $502.7 million (the “2018 Acquisitions”), which includes one land parcel for build-to-suit development, $2.1 million related to an outstanding tenant improvement allowance and $2.6 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company acquired a controlling interest in 88 commercial properties and three3 land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million (the “2017 Acquisitions”), which includes $3.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized in accordance with ASU 2017-01 and includes 22 properties acquired in a nonmonetary exchange discussed below. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, costs related to property acquisitions were expensed as incurred. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company acquired a controlling interest in eight commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $100.2 million (the “2016 Acquisitions”). During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired 16 commercial properties and nine land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $36.3 million (the “2015 Acquisitions”).
The following table presents the allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the periods presented (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Real estate investments, at cost:      
Land $83,476
 $86,285
 $110,634
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 268,470
 350,942
 523,445
Total tangible assets 351,946
 437,227
 634,079
Acquired intangible assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles (1)
 51,627
 62,791
 105,940
Above-market leases (2)
 
 2,750
 10,445
Assumed intangible liabilities:      
Below-market leases (3)
 
 (116) (1,680)
Total purchase price of assets acquired $403,573
 $502,652
 $748,784
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Real estate investments, at cost:      
Land $110,634
 $23,187
 $5,051
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 523,445
 67,865
 28,643
Total tangible assets 634,079
 91,052
 33,694
Acquired intangible assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles (1)
 105,940
 9,613
 2,580
Above-market leases (2)
 10,445
 
 153
Assumed intangible liabilities:      
Below-market leases (3)
 (1,680) (471) (108)
Total purchase price of assets acquired $748,784
 $100,194
 $36,319

(1)The weighted average amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles is 16.5 years, 16.3 years and 15.8 years 13.8 years and 11.0 years for 20172019 Acquisitions, 20162018 Acquisitions and 20152017 Acquisitions, respectively.
(2)The weighted average amortization period for acquired above-market leases is 10.8 years and 18.0 years for 2018 Acquisitions and 14.1 years for 2017 Acquisitions, and 2015 Acquisitions, respectively. There were no acquired above-market leases during the year ended December 31, 2016.
(3)The weighted average amortization period for acquiredassumed intangible lease liabilities is 9.9 years and 13.8 years 10.0 years and 15.0 years for 2017 Acquisitions, 20162018 Acquisitions and 20152017 Acquisitions, respectively.

Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company disposed of 201 properties, including the sale of 6 consolidated properties to 2 newly-formed joint ventures in which the Company owns a 20% equity interest (the “Industrial Partnership”) and 1 property sold through a foreclosure as discussed in Note 6 –Debt, for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.2 billion, of which our share was $1.1 billion after the profit participation payments related to the disposition of 36 Red Lobster properties. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $1.1 billion after closing costs and contributions to the Industrial Partnership. The Company recorded a gain of $293.9 million related to the dispositions, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company disposed of 149 properties, including 1 property conveyed to a lender in a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, for an aggregate gross sales price of $526.4 million, of which our share was $504.3 million after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 34 Red Lobster properties. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $496.7 million after closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $96.2 million related to the sales which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

F-30

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company also disposed of 1 property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture for a gross sales price of $34.1 million, of which our share was $17.1 million based on our ownership interest in the joint venture, resulting in proceeds of $5.6 million after debt repayments of $20.4 million and closing costs. The Company has not included pro forma information for the Company's 2016 Acquisitions or 2015 Acquisitions, which were acquired priorrecorded a gain of $0.7 million related to the adoptionsale and liquidation of ASU 2017-01the joint venture, which is included in equity in income and metgain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the definition of a business combination, as they did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or resultsaccompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Future Lease Payments
The following table presents future minimum base rent payments due to the Company over the next five years and thereafter. These amounts exclude contingent rent payments, as applicable, that may be collected from certain tenants based on provisions related to sales thresholds and increases in annual rent based on exceeding certain economic indexes among other items (in thousands):
  Future Minimum Operating Lease
Base Rent Payments
 
Future Minimum
Direct Financing Lease Payments
(1)
2018 $1,105,205
 $3,016
2019 1,082,111
 2,397
2020 1,049,997
 2,023
2021 1,009,474
 1,899
2022 929,909
 1,809
Thereafter 5,950,591
 2,184
Total $11,127,287
 $13,328

(1)29 properties are subject to direct financing leases and, therefore, revenue is recognized as direct financing lease income on the discounted cash flows of the lease payments. Amounts reflected are the minimum base rental cash payments due to the Company under the lease agreements on these respective properties.
Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company disposed of 137 properties, including one1 property owned by a consolidated joint venture, six6 properties transferred to the lender in either a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction as discussed in Note 106Debt, and 15 properties disposed of in connection with thea nonmonetary exchange discussed below, for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9 million, of which our share was $574.4 million after the profit participation paymentspayment related to the disposition of 31 Red Lobster properties and the consolidated joint venture partner’s share of the sales price. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $445.5 million after a mortgage loan assumption of $66.0 million and closing costs. Additionally, the Company’s tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 included $1.7 million of Canadian tax gain on the gain on sale of certain Canadian properties. The Company recorded a gain of $64.7 million, related to the sales which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company disposed of 301 properties, for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.08 billion, of which our share was $1.04 billion after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 70 Red Lobsters. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $958.4 million after a mortgage loan assumption of $55.0 million and closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $45.7 million, which included $67.8 million of goodwill allocated to the cost basis of such properties, which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company also disposed of one property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture for a gross sales price of $113.5 million, of which our share was $102.1 million based on our ownership interest in the joint venture, resulting in proceeds of $42.3 million after debt repayments of $57.0 million and closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $10.2 million related to the sale, which is included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company disposed of 228 properties, including two properties owned by consolidated joint ventures, for an aggregate sales price of $1.4 billion, resulting in consolidated proceeds of $966.1 million after mortgage loan assumptions and closing costs. The Company recorded a loss of $69.1 million related to the sales, which included $96.7 million of goodwill allocated in the cost basis of such properties. The Company’s loss on the sales is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

F-31

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company also disposed of its interest in one consolidated joint venture, whose only assets consisted of investments in three Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, for an aggregate gross sales price of $77.5 million, of which the Company’s share was $69.8 million based on its ownership interest, resulting in consolidated proceeds of $43.0 million after mortgage loan repayment and closing costs. The mortgage loan obligation of the consolidated joint venture was held by an unconsolidated entity. The Company recorded a gain of $6.7 million related to the sale of the consolidated joint venture, which is included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were 305 properties classified as held for sale with a carrying value of $38.3$27.0 million, included in assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net, primarily comprised of land of $6.3 million and building, fixtures and improvements, net of $19.8 million, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets, which are expected to be sold in the next 12 months as part of the Company’s portfolio management strategy. As of December 31, 2016,2018, there were 115 properties classified as held for sale. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded a losslosses of $1.3 million, $1.9 million and $3.1 million respectively, related to held for sale properties. No goodwill was allocated to the cost basis of any additional properties classified as held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a loss of $0.2 million related to properties classified as held for sale during the respective period, which included $3.2 million of goodwill allocated to the cost basis of such properties. The loss on properties held for sale is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Intangible Lease Assets and Liabilities
Intangible lease assets and liabilities of the Company consisted of the following as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted-average useful life):
  Weighted-Average Useful Life December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Intangible lease assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $748,689 and $703,909, respectively 15.9 $854,196
 $980,971
Leasing commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $6,027 and $4,048, respectively 10.1 17,808
 15,660
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of accumulated amortization of $112,438 and $105,936, respectively 16.3 165,483
 201,875
Total intangible lease assets, net   $1,037,487
 $1,198,506
       
Intangible lease liabilities:      
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $99,315 and $89,905, respectively 19.1 $143,583
 $173,479

The aggregate amount of amortization of above‑ and below-market leases and deferred lease incentives included as a net decrease to rental revenue was $2.5 million, $4.2 million and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The aggregate amount of in-place leases, leasing commissions and other lease intangibles amortized and included in depreciation and amortization expense was $127.5 million, $139.6 million and $154.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

F-31

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)
  Weighted-Average Useful Life December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Intangible lease assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $599,680 and $494,131, respectively 15.2 $1,091,433
 $1,192,756
Leasing commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $2,902 and $1,836, respectively 10.6 13,876
 10,231
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of accumulated amortization of $88,335 and $69,670, respectively 16.3 241,449
 275,897
Total intangible lease assets, net   $1,346,758
 $1,478,884
       
Intangible lease liabilities:      
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $73,916 and $56,891, respectively 18.7 $198,551
 $224,023

The following table provides the projected amortization expense and adjustments to rental incomerevenue related to the intangible lease assets and liabilities for the next five years as of December 31, 20172019 (amounts in thousands):
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
In-place leases and other intangibles:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense $116,812
 $108,990
 $95,237
 $84,843
 $74,347
Leasing commissions:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense 2,361
 2,203
 2,102
 1,827
 1,612
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives:        
Total projected to be deducted from rental revenue 19,301
 18,876
 18,064
 17,120
 15,749
Below-market lease liabilities:          
Total projected to be included in rental revenue 16,840
 15,189
 13,497
 12,774
 10,927
  2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
In-place leases and other intangibles:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense $135,212
 $125,701
 $118,390
 $110,425
 $95,990
Leasing commissions:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense 1,186
 1,172
 1,150
 1,112
 1,056
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives:        
Total projected to be deducted from rental income 23,773
 22,039
 21,625
 21,197
 20,383
Below-market lease liabilities:          
Total projected to be included in rental income 19,097
 18,392
 17,244
 16,045
 15,201

F-32

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)


Nonmonetary Exchange
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed a nonmonetary exchange through the simultaneous acquisition of 22 Bob Evans properties and disposition of 15 Red Lobster properties. Pursuant to Nonmonetary Transactions, ASC (Topic 845), the cost of a nonmonetary asset acquired in exchange for another nonmonetary asset is the fair value of the asset surrendered to obtain the acquired nonmonetary asset, and a gain or loss should be recognized on the exchange. The fair value of the asset received should be used to measure the cost if the fair value of the asset received is more reliable than the fair value of the asset surrendered. The Company estimated the fair value of the Bob Evans and Red Lobster properties using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach and concluded that the fair value was $50.1 million. As the fair value of the assets received exceeded the book value of the assets surrendered, the Company recorded a gain of $7.4 million, which is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Impairment of Real Estate Investments
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable.
As part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures and considering the factors discussed regarding the Company’s policies on real estate impairment mentioned in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, real estate assets and an investment in a property subject to a direct financing lease with carrying values totaling $161.9 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to their estimated fair values of $111.4 million resulting in impairment charges of $50.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The majority of the 2017 impairment charges relate to certain office, restaurant and other properties that, during 2017, management identified for potential sale or determined, based on discussions with the current tenants, will not be re-leased.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, a majority of the impairment charges related to properties identified by management for potential sale as part of its portfolio management strategy to reduce exposure to office properties. Additionally, a tenant of 59 restaurants filed for bankruptcy. As part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures and considering the factors mentioned above, real estate assets with carrying values totaling $668.2 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to their estimated fair values of $485.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $182.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, real estate assets with carrying value totaling $340.1 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying value was reduced to their estimated fair value of $248.3 million, resulting in impairment charges of $91.8 million.
Consolidated Joint Ventures
The Company had an interest in one1 consolidated joint venture that owned one1 property as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2018. As of each of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the consolidated joint venture had total assets of $33.7$32.5 million, of which $30.7$29.6 million and $29.9 million, respectively, were real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Asamortization at each of December 31, 2016, the Company had interests in two joint ventures that owned two properties and had total assets of $57.0 million, of which $50.8 million were real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, onerespective dates. The property wasis secured by a mortgage note payable, of $14.9 million and $11.6 million, respectively, which wasis non-recourse to the Company.Company and had a balance of $14.3 million and $14.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company has the ability to control operating and financialfinancing policies of the consolidated joint ventures.venture. There are restrictions on the use of these assets as the Company would generally be required to obtain the approval of eachthe joint venture partner (the “Partner”) in accordance with the joint venture agreement for any major transactions. The Company and each Partnerthe joint venture partner are subject to the provisions of eachthe joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
The Partners’ share of the aggregate consolidated joint ventures’ loss was $0.2 million and $14,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Partners’ share of the aggregate consolidated joint ventures’ income was $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. One joint venture disposed of its property during the year ended December 31, 2017 and the Company disposed of its interest in three consolidated joint ventures during the year ended December 31, 2015, which included one consolidated joint venture, whose only assets were investments in three Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (as defined below).

F-33

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements (the “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures”)ventures consisted of interests in twothe Industrial Partnership and 1 unconsolidated joint ventures that each owned one propertyventure as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016. Asan interest in 1 unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2017 and2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Company disposed of 1 property owned aggregate equity investments of $39.5 million and $41.3 million, respectively,by an unconsolidated joint venture as previously discussed in the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. “Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale” section herein.
The Company accounts for its investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in earnings and distributions from theunconsolidated joint ventures. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s maximum exposure to risk was $39.5 million, the carrying value of the investments, which is presented in investment in unconsolidated entities in the consolidated balance sheet. The Unconsolidated Joint Venturesventures had total aggregate debt outstanding of $20.4$269.3 million as of December 31, 2017, none of2019, which is recoursenon-recourse to the Company, as discussed in Note 106Debt. There was 0 debt outstanding related to the unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2018.
The Company and the respective unconsolidated joint venture partners are subject to the provisions of the applicable joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
Duringshortfalls, including the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized $3.3 millions, $0.9 million and $2.3 millionCompany’s share of net income, respectively, from the unconsolidated joint ventures.
expansion project capital expenditures. The following is a summary of the Company’s percentage ownership and carrying amount related to each of the Unconsolidated Joint Venturesinvestments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2017 and2019, December 31, 20162018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

F-32

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

      
Carrying Amount of Investment (2)
Name of Joint Venture  Partner 
Ownership % (1)
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Cole/Mosaic JV South Elgin IL, LLC Affiliate of Mosaic Properties and Development, LLC 50% $5,382
 $5,891
Cole/Faison JV Bethlehem GA, LLC Faison-Winder Investors, LLC 90% 34,138
 35,438
      $39,520
 $41,329
      
Carrying Amount of Investment (1)
 
Equity in Income (2)
       Year Ended
Investment 
Ownership % (3)
 Number of Properties December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Faison JV Bethlehem GA 90% 1 $40,416
 $35,289
 $2,364
 $1,219
 $3,068
Industrial Partnership 20% 6 $28,409
 $
 $254
 $
 $

(1)The total carrying amount of the investments was greater than the underlying equity in net assets by $4.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. This difference relates to a purchase price allocation of goodwill and a step up in fair value of the investment assets acquired in connection with mergers. The step up in fair value was allocated to the individual investment assets and is being amortized in accordance with the Company’s depreciation policy.
(2)During the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities from the unconsolidated joint venture which disposed of its property during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(3)The Company’s ownership interest in this table reflects its legal ownership interest. Legal ownership may, at times, not equal the Company’s economic interest in the listed properties because of various provisions in certain joint venture agreements regarding distributions of cash flow based on capital account balances, allocations of profits and losses and payments of preferred returns. As a result, the Company’s actual economic interest (as distinct from its legal ownership interest) in certain of the properties could fluctuate from time to time and may not wholly align with its legal ownership interests.
(2)The total carrying amount of the investments was greater than the underlying equity in net assets by $8.6 million and $6.4 million as of December 31, 2017. and December 31, 2016, respectively. This difference relates to a purchase price allocation of goodwill and a step up in fair value of the investment assets acquired in connection with mergers. The step up in fair value was allocated to the individual investment assets and is being amortized in accordance with the Company’s depreciation policy.

F-34

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)


Note 5 — Discontinued Operations
On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCA and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries to the Cole Purchaser for approximately $120.0 million paid in cash at closing, subject to customary adjustments to reflect the operation of CCA and such subsidiaries prior to closing. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. At closing, the Company entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with the Cole Purchaser pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole Purchaser and the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support, over the next year. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Company will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided. The Company could also receive additional fees over the next six years if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Carrying amount of major classes of assets included in discontinued operations:    
Cash $2,198
 $2,973
Intangible assets, net (1)
 9,892
 24,383
Other assets, net (2)
 6,975
 16,626
Goodwill (3)
 124,812
 124,812
Due from Cole REITs, net 1,284
 5,445
Loss recognized on classification as held for sale (4)
 (19,509) 
Assets related to discontinued operations, net 125,652
 174,239
     
Real estate assets held for sale, net (5)
 38,347
 38,928
Assets related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale, net
 $163,999
 $213,167
     
Carrying amount of major classes of liabilities included in discontinued operations:    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $14,269
 $11,276
Other liabilities 1,512
 68
Due to Cole REITs 100
 
Liabilities related to discontinued operations
 $15,881
 $11,344

(1)The intangible assets consisted of management and advisory contracts that the Company had with certain Cole REITs. Accumulated amortization was $44.1 million and $29.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(2)
Includes program development costs of $3.3 million and $3.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which were net of reserves of $7.6 millionand $31.7 million, respectively.
(3)The Company performed the annual goodwill test using the $120.0 million cash proceeds provided for under the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement, plus the estimated fair value of the Net Revenue Payments and determined the carrying amount exceeded the estimated fair value. As such, no goodwill impairment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017.
(4)The Company recognized a loss of $20.0 million on classification of the discontinued operations as held for sale, of which $0.5 million represents estimated costs to sell that were subsequently accrued in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2017. In determining the loss recognized on classification as held for sale, the Company elected to account for the future Net Revenue Payments as a gain contingency. Under this approach, the Company will not recognize any Net Revenue Payments until realized.
(5)Real estate assets held for sale are not included in assets related to discontinued operations.







F-35

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following is a summary of the financial information and cash flows for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
Revenues: 2017 2016 2015
Offering-related fees and reimbursements $16,096
 $36,526
 $24,412
Transaction service fees and reimbursements 13,929
 12,533
 25,256
Management fees and reimbursements 76,214
 68,686
 58,793
Total revenues $106,239
 $117,745
 $108,461
Operating expenses:     
Cole Capital reallowed fees and commissions 9,879
 23,174
 16,195
Transaction costs 3,802
 
 
General and administrative 63,783
 82,558
 79,602
Amortization of intangible assets 14,490
 26,148
 25,884
Goodwill and intangible asset impairments 
 120,931
 213,339
Total operating expenses 91,954
 252,811
 335,020
Operating income (loss) 14,285
 (135,066) (226,559)
Other income (expense), net 464
 292
 1,167
Loss recognized on classification as held for sale (20,027) 
 
Loss before taxes (5,278) (134,774) (225,392)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes (13,839) 10,837
 40,892
Loss from discontinued operations $(19,117) $(123,937) $(184,500)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Cash flows related to discontinued operations:      
Cash flows from operating activities $33,232
 $35,251
 $31,431
Cash flows from investing activities $
 $
 $
Income Taxes
Cole Capital’s business, substantially all of which was conducted through a TRS, recognized a provision of $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and a benefit of $10.8 million and $40.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-36

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table presents the reconciliation of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Loss before taxes $(5,278) $(134,774) $(225,392)
Less: Income from non-taxable entities (9,523) (9,008) (8,440)
Loss attributable to taxable subsidiaries before income taxes $(14,801) $(143,782) $(233,832)
       
Federal provision at statutory rate (35%) (5,180) (50,324) (81,841)
Impairment of goodwill 
 42,327
 48,880
Nondeductible portion of transaction costs and loss recognized on classification as held for sale 8,283
 
 
Impact of change in federal tax rate 3,481
 
 
Impact of valuation allowance 6,165
 
 
State income taxes and other 1,090
 (2,840) (7,931)
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes - Cole Capital $13,839
 $(10,837) $(40,892)
The following table presents the components of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Current      
Federal $(120) $2,244
 $9,058
State 602
 (2,762) 2,110
Total current provision for (benefit from) income taxes 482
 (518) 11,168
Deferred      
Federal 12,016
 (9,021) (45,255)
State 1,341
 (1,298) (6,805)
Total deferred provision for (benefit from) income taxes 13,357
 (10,319) (52,060)
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes - Cole Capital $13,839
 $(10,837) $(40,892)
The components of the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 which are included in assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows (in thousands):
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 
Intangible assets $(1,590) $(7,858) 
Accrued compensation 1,253
 6,163
 
Fixed assets (1,568) (3,155) 
Product development costs 1,680
 11,668
 
Equity-based compensation 4,772
 4,249
 
Other 555
 1,227
 
Total net deferred tax asset 5,102
 12,294
 
Less: valuation allowance (6,165) 
 
Net deferred tax (liability) asset $(1,063) $12,294
 


F-37

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 6 – Investment Securities, at Fair Value
Investment securities are considered available-for-sale and, therefore, increases or decreases in the fair value of these investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of equity in the consolidated balance sheets unless the securities are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired at which time the losses are reclassified to expense.
The following tables detail the unrealized gains and losses on investment securities as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2017
  Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
CMBS $43,006
 $895
 $(2,927) $40,974
  December 31, 2016

 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
CMBS $48,297
 $1,248
 $(2,330) $47,215
As of each of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owned eight CMBS with an estimated aggregate fair value of $41.0 million and $47.2 million, respectively. The Company generally receives monthly payments of principal and interest on the CMBS. As of December 31, 2017, the Company earned interest on the CMBS at rates ranging between 5.9% and 9.0%. As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of six CMBS were below their amortized cost. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers a variety of factors, including: (i) whether the Company has the intent to sell the security, (ii) whether the Company expects to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value, and (iii) whether the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The Company believes that none of the unrealized losses on investment securities are other-than-temporary as management expects the Company will fully recover the entire amortized cost basis of all securities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no other-than-temporary impairment losses.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a $0.1 million gain on the sale of investment securities, which is included in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No such gain was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.
The scheduled maturity of the Company’s CMBS as of December 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
  December 31, 2017
  Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due within one year $
 $
Due after one year through five years 17,895
 18,445
Due after five years through 10 years 12,053
 9,156
Due after 10 years 13,058
 13,373
Total $43,006

$40,974
Note 7 – Mortgage Notes Receivable
As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned eight mortgage notes receivable with a weighted-average interest rate of 6.2% and weighted-average years to maturity of 12.6 years. During the year ended December 31, 2017, one mortgage note with a carrying value of $1.5 million at repayment was paid in full prior to the maturity date resulting in a $0.1 million gain, which is included in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The following table details the mortgage notes receivable as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Outstanding Balance Carrying Value Interest Rate Range Maturity Date Range
$22,496
 $20,294
 5.9%6.8% December 2026January 2033

F-38

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The Company’s mortgage notes receivable are comprised primarily of fully-amortizing or nearly fully-amortizing first mortgage loans. The Company has one mortgage note receivable where the Company does not receive monthly payments of principal and interest but rather the interest is capitalized into the outstanding balance that is due at maturity. The mortgage notes receivable are primarily on commercial real estate, each leased to a single tenant. Therefore, the Company’s monitoring of the credit quality of its mortgage notes receivable is focused primarily on an analysis of the tenant, including review of tenant quality and ratings, trends in the tenant’s industry and general economic conditions and an analysis of measures of collateral coverage, such as an estimate of the loan-to-value ratio (principal amount outstanding divided by the estimated value of the property) and its remaining term until maturity.
The following table summarizes the scheduled aggregate principal payments due to the Company on the mortgage notes receivable subsequent to December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
  Outstanding Balance
Due within one year $930
Due after one year through five years 4,422
Due after five years through 10 years 7,089
Due after 10 years(1)
 13,837
Total $26,278

(1)Includes additional $3.8 million of interest that will be capitalized into the outstanding balance of the mortgage note receivable subsequent to December 31, 2017.
Unsecured Note Reserve
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company assessed the collectability of an unsecured note held with an affiliate of the Former Manager after the December debt service payment was not paid. The Company assessed the liquidity of the borrower, the lien position of the note and the other obligations of the borrower. Based on the analysis, the Company concluded that it was unlikely that the unsecured note will be repaid and recorded a reserve for loan loss equal to the $15.3 million carrying value of the note for the three months ended December 31, 2015. No principal or interest payments have been received relating to the unsecured note during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Note 8 – Rent4 –Rent and Tenant Receivables and Other Assets, Net
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 (in thousands):
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Straight-line rent receivable, net (1)
 $266,195
 $259,106
Accounts receivable, net (1)
 $36,921
 $49,114
 41,556
 36,939
Straight-line rent receivable, net (2)
 230,529
 201,585
Deferred costs, net (3)(2)
 5,746
 16,154
 7,208
 17,515
Investment in direct financing leases, net 9,341
 13,254
Investment in Cole REITs (3)
 7,552
 7,844
Prepaid expenses 6,493
 6,452
 3,453
 5,022
Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net (4)
 12,089
 14,702
 4,809
 9,754
Restricted escrow deposits 4,995
 5,741
Income tax receivable 3,213
 18,045
Interest rate swap assets, at fair value 627
 199
Other assets, net (5)
 4,376
 2,313
Other assets, net 8,281
 16,658
Total $304,989

$314,305
 $348,395

$366,092

___________________________________
(1)AllowanceAs of December 31, 2018, allowance for doubtfuluncollectible accounts included in straight-line rent receivable, net and accounts receivable, net was $6.3$1.0 million and $6.0$5.3 million, respectively. Upon adoption of ASC 842, the Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental revenue and does not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Any recoveries for those receivables reserved prior to adoption of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.ASC 842 will be recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue.
(2)Allowance for doubtful accounts included in straight-line rent receivable, net was $2.0 million as of December 31, 2017. No such allowance was included in the straight-line rent receivable at December 31, 2016.
(3)
Amortization expense for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facilityfacilities totaled $2.1 million, $7.3 million and $10.4 million, $10.4 millionand$10.7 millionfor the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.respectively, inclusive of write-offs of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no related write-offs for the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017. Accumulated amortization for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facilityfacilities was $40.3$49.8 million and $29.8$47.6 million as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.
(3)
On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of Cole Capital (as described in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations), retaining interests in CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V.
(4)
Amortization expense for leasehold improvements totaled $0.7 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2019 with no related write-offs and $1.2 million, $2.3for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, with no related write-offs. Accumulated amortization was $2.8 million and $2.2$5.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Depreciation expense for property and equipment totaled $1.3 million, $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016respectively, inclusive of write-offs of less than $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Accumulated depreciation was $5.4 million and $7.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company disposed of $4.3 million, net, of leasehold improvements, property and equipment, which is included in restructuring expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.


F-39F-33

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)

2015, respectively, inclusive of write offs of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Accumulated amortization was $4.7 million and $3.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Depreciation expense for property and equipment totaled $1.8 million, $3.4 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, inclusive of write offs of $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(5)
Net of $1.8 million and $1.6 million of interest receivable reserves as of December 31, 2017andDecember 31, 2016.

Note 95 – Fair Value Measures
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. U.S. GAAP guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company expectsdoes not expect that changes in classifications between levels will be infrequent.frequent.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on market rates of the Company’s positions and other observable interest rates as discussed in Note 6 – Investment Securities, at Fair Value andNote 11 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall (in thousands):


Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Assets:







Derivative assets
$
 $250
 $

$250
Investment in Cole REITs 
 
 7,552
 7,552
Total assets $
 $250
 $7,552
 $7,802
Liabilities:        
Derivative liabilities
$
 $(28,081) $

$(28,081)



Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2018
Assets:        
Derivative assets $
 $544
 $
 $544
Investment in Cole REITs 
 
 7,844
 7,844
Total assets $
 $544
 $7,844
 $8,388



Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2017
Assets:







CMBS $
 $
 $40,974
 $40,974
Derivative assets

 627
 

627
Total assets $
 $627
 $40,974
 $41,601



Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2016
Assets:        
CMBS $
 $
 $47,215
 $47,215
Derivative assets 
 199
 
 199
Total assets $
 $199
 $47,215
 $47,414
Liabilities:        
Derivative liabilities $
 $(3,547) $
 $(3,547)
CMBS – The Company’s CMBS are carried at fair value and are valued using Level 3 inputs. The Company used estimated non-binding quoted market prices from the trading desks of financial institutions that are dealers in such securities for similar CMBS tranches that actively participate in the CMBS market. Broker quotes are only indicative of fair value and may not necessarily represent what the Company would receive in an actual trade for the applicable instrument. Management determines that the prices are representative of fair value through its knowledge and experience in the market. The significant unobservable input used in

F-40

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

valuing the CMBS is the discount rate or market yield used to discount the estimated future cash flows expected to be received from the underlying investment, which include both future principal and interest payments. Significant increases or decreases in the discount rate or market yield would result in a decrease or increase in the fair value measurement. The following risks are included in the consideration and selection of discount rates or market yields: risk of default, rating of the investment and comparable company investments.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities The Company’s derivative financial instruments relate to interest rate swaps, discussed in Note 11 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities.swaps. The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.

F-34

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2017,2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investment in Cole REITs The fair values of CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V were estimated using the net asset value per share. Each of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, due to affiliates and accounts payable approximate their carrying value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets due to their short-term nature and are classified as Level 1 underCole REIT’s share redemption programs includes restrictions that limit the fair value hierarchy.number of shares redeemed by the respective Cole REIT.
The following are reconciliations of the changes in assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 20162019 (in thousands):
  CMBS
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017 $47,215
Total gains and losses  
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income, net (951)
Purchases, issuance, settlements  
Return of principal received (4,388)
Amortization included in net income, net (902)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2017 $40,974
  Investment in Cole REITs
Beginning balance, January 1, 2019 $7,844
Unrealized loss included in other income, net (292)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2019 $7,552
  CMBS
Beginning balance, January 1, 2016 $53,304
Total gains and losses  
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive loss, net (2,271)
Purchases, issuance, settlements  
Return of principal received (4,077)
Accretion included in net loss, net 259
Ending Balance, December 31, 2016 $47,215

F-41

TableThe following are reconciliations of Contents
VEREIT, INC.the changes in assets and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the year ended December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not reported at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are reported below (dollar amounts in2018 (in thousands):
  Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Investment in Cole REITs
Beginning balance, January 1, 2018 $40,974
 $3,264
Total gains and losses    
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income, net (205) 
Realized loss included in other income, net (34) 
Unrealized gain included in other income, net 
 5,102
Purchases, issuance, settlements    
Return of principal received (4,864) 
Amortization included in net income, net 157
 
Sale of investments (36,028) (522)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2018 $
 $7,844

  Level Carrying Amount at December 31, 2017 Fair Value at December 31, 2017 Carrying Amount at December 31, 2016 Fair Value at December 31, 2016
Assets:          
Mortgage notes receivable 3 $20,294
 $28,272
 $22,764
 $30,460
           
Liabilities (1):
          
Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net 2 $2,095,690
 $2,144,522
 $2,687,739
 $2,713,155
Corporate bonds, net 2 2,848,768
 2,922,027
 2,248,063
 2,273,850
Convertible debt, net 2 992,218
 1,012,349
 987,106
 1,004,733
Credit facility 2 185,000
 185,000
 500,000
 500,000
Total liabilities   $6,121,676
 $6,263,898
 $6,422,908
 $6,491,738

(1)Current and prior period liabilities’ carrying and fair values exclude net deferred financing costs.
Mortgage notes receivable – The fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate loan portfolio is estimated with a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing scheduled cash flows and discount rates estimated by management to approximate market interest rates.
Debt – The fair value is estimated by an independent third party using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on management’s estimates of observable market interest rates. Corporate bonds and convertible debt are valued using quoted market prices in active markets with limited trading volume when available.
Items MeasuredMortgage Notes Payable
Summary and Obligations
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of $1.5 billion, which was collateralized by 355 properties, reflecting a decrease from December 31, 2018 of $388.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily related to prepayments of mortgage notes payable. Our mortgage indebtedness bore interest at Fair Valuethe weighted-average rate of 5.05% per annum and had a weighted-average maturity of 2.8 years. We may in the future incur additional mortgage debt on the properties we currently own or use long-term non-recourse financing to acquire additional properties.
The payment terms of our loan obligations vary. In general, only interest amounts are payable monthly with all unpaid principal and interest due at maturity. Some of our loan agreements require that we comply with specific reporting and financial covenants mainly related to debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Each loan that has these requirements has specific ratio thresholds that must be met.
Restrictions on Loan Covenants
Our mortgage loan obligations generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios), as well as the maintenance of a Non-Recurring Basisminimum net worth. The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends as of December 31, 2019.
Certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.Derivative Activity
Real Estate Investments
As discussed in Note 46Real Estate InvestmentsDebt and Related IntangiblesNote 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, during the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million notional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, to hedge interest rate volatility. Due to an improvement in the Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company also entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 120 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments), with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt.
Dividends
On November 5, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of Common Stock (equaling an annualized dividend of $0.55 per share) for the fourth quarter of 2019 to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2019, which was paid on January 15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP Unit.
Our Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in Note 12 – Equity to our consolidated financial statements, will pay cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis).

Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Principal payments - mortgage notes $1,529,057
 $188,385
 $588,466
 $745,238
 $6,968
Interest payments - mortgage notes (1)
 210,667
 74,251
 102,135
 33,154
 1,127
Principal payments - Credit Facility 1,050,000
 
 150,000
 900,000
 
Interest payments - Credit Facility (1) (2)
 119,683
 38,281
 72,246
 9,156
 
Principal payments - corporate bonds 2,850,000
 
 
 500,000
 2,350,000
Interest payments - corporate bonds 796,198
 119,988
 239,976
 219,212
 217,022
Principal payments - convertible debt 321,802
 321,802
 
 
 
Interest payments - convertible debt 11,531
 11,531
 
 
 
Operating and ground lease commitments 334,977
 22,287
 44,406
 42,827
 225,457
Other commitments (3)
 4,345
 4,345
 
 
 
Total $7,228,260
 $780,870
 $1,197,229
 $2,449,587
 $2,800,574
____________________________________
(1)Interest payments due in future periods on the $164.4 million of variable rate debt were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.
(2)As of December 31, 2019, we had $900.0 million of variable rate debt on the Credit Facility Term Loan effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the interest rates effectively fixed under our swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(3)Includes the Company’s share of capital expenditures related to an expansion project of the property held within an unconsolidated joint venture and letters of credit outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, all letters of credit outstanding were terminated.
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in operating activities increased $601.5 million to $107.6 million from $493.9 million net cash provided by operating activities during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $524.5 million increase in litigation and non-routine costs, net, including litigation settlements, paid during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $462.1 million to $613.2 million from $151.1 million during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily related to an increase in cash proceeds from dispositions of real estate and joint ventures of $565.2 million and a decrease in investments in real estate assets of $106.0 million, offset by a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations of $122.9 million, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of CMBS and mortgage notes receivables of $37.1 million and an investmentincrease in payments for capital expenditures and leasing costs and real estate developments of $34.6 million.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $525.4 million decreased $130.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from $655.4 million during the same period in 2018. The decrease was primarily related to $1.0 billion of proceeds received from the issuance of Common Stock in 2019, offset by the redemption of $300.1 million of Series F Preferred Stock in 2019, an increase in payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs of $236.2 million, and a property subjectdecrease of $170.0 million in net proceeds related to a direct financing lease representing 69 propertiesthe credit facilities, corporate bonds and convertible notes. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, $192.0 million of payments were deemedmade related to be impairedthe surrender of Limited Partner OP Units, with no comparable activity during the same period in 2018.
Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and their carrying values totaling $161.9 million were reduced to their estimated fair valueAnalysis of $111.4 million, resultingFinancial Condition and Results of Operations" in impairment charges of $50.5 million. Duringthe Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 21, 2019, for the cash flow analysis for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017.


Election as a REIT
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019.
The Operating Partnership is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the Operating Partnership is required to take into account its allocable share of the Operating Partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the Operating Partnership may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property. Under the LPA, the Operating Partnership is required to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The Company conducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. However, net leases that require the tenant to pay its allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, may reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
Through the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we were contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis. For further explanation of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees see Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable-rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and forwards in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included fixed-rate debt, including debt that has interest rates that are fixed with the use of derivative instruments, with a fair value and carrying value of $5.8 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively. Changes in market interest rates on our fixed rate debt impact the fair value of the debt, but they have no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates rise 100 basis points, and the fixed rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our debt to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of $217.6 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of $236.0 million.
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included variable-rate debt with a fair value and carrying value of $164.5 million and $164.4 million, respectively. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates on our variable-rate debt would increase or decrease our interest expense by $1.6 million annually. See Note 6 –Debt to our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2019, our interest rate swaps had a fair value that resulted in net liabilities of $27.8 million. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2019, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
In July 2017, the FCA announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Company is not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. The Company has contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest amounts on our variable rate debt as discussed in Note 6 –Debt and the swap rate for our interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion on risks related to changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined, or the use of alternative reference rates.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company is subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, geographies or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this document.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
I. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the General Partner
For purposes of the discussion in this Part I of Item 9A, the “Company” refers to the General Partner.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
II. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the Operating Partnership
In the information incorporated by reference into this Part II of Item 9A, the term “Company” refers to the Operating Partnership, except as the context otherwise requires.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020



Item 9B. Other Information.
None

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item will be included in our Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
The Financial Statements are included herein at pages F-1 through F-59.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included herein on page F-60.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included herein on pages F-61 through F-178.
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans Held for Investment is included herein on page F-179.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
Exhibit No.Description
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
4.1
4.2
4.3

Exhibit No.Description
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20*
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4†
10.5†
10.6†
10.7†
10.8†
10.9†

Exhibit No.Description
10.10†
10.11†
10.12†
10.13†
10.14†
10.15†
10.16†
10.17†
10.18†
10.19†
10.20†
10.21†
10.22†
10.23†
10.24†
10.25†
10.26†
10.27†
10.28†
10.29†
10.30

Exhibit No.Description
10.31
21.1*
23.1*
23.2*
31.1*
31.2*
31.3*
31.4*
32.1**
32.2**
32.3**
32.4**
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101.*).
_____________________________
*Filed herewith
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not Applicable


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VEREIT, INC.
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By: VEREIT, Inc., its sole general partner
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 25, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameCapacity *Date
/s/ Glenn J. RufranoChief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Glenn J. Rufrano(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
/s/ Michael J. BartolottaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Michael J. Bartolotta(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Gavin B. BrandonSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Gavin B. Brandon(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Hugh R. FraterDirector, Non-Executive ChairmanFebruary 25, 2020
Hugh R. Frater
/s/ David B. HenryDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
David B. Henry
/s/ Mary Hogan PreusseDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mary Hogan Preusse
/s/ Richard J. LiebDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Richard J. Lieb
/s/ Mark S. OrdanDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mark S. Ordan
/s/ Eugene A. PinoverDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Eugene A. Pinover
/s/ Julie G. RichardsonDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Julie G. Richardson

*Each person is signing in his or her capacity as an officer and/or director of VEREIT, Inc., which is the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Investments - Impairments- Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets related to 153 and 202 properties, respectively, withmay not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of real estate assets by determining whether the carrying values totaling $668.2 million and $340.1 million, respectively, were deemed tovalue of the assets will be impairedrecovered from the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. Estimating future undiscounted cash flows requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimating the expected holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability.
In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying values were reducedvalue, the Company will adjust the carrying value of real estate assets to their estimatedrespective fair values of $485.4 million and $248.3 million, respectively, resulting inrecognize an impairment charges of $182.8 million and $91.8 million, respectively. The Company estimatesloss. Generally, fair values using Level 3 inputs andvalue is determined using a combined income and market approach, specifically using discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. The evaluationDuring 2019, the Company recorded $47.1 million of impairment charges.

We identified the impairment of real estate assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions required to evaluate the recoverability of real estate assets, including the estimated holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability. Auditing the assumptions used by the Company in estimating future undiscounted cash flows required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the Company’s recoverability analysis.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures to test the assumptions used by management to estimate forecasted cash flows, including management’s expected holding period of such real estate assets, consisted of the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over the inputs of the forecasted cash flows used in the recoverability analysis.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the undiscounted future cash flows analysis, including estimates of future occupancy levels, market rental revenue, and capitalization rates, in addition to the assessment of expected remaining holding period and changes in management’s intent with respect to the expected holding period for each real estate asset with possible impairment indicators by:
1.Making inquiries of accounting and operations management.
2.Comparing the source data and management’s assumptions to the Company’s historical results and external market sources.
3.Testing the mathematical accuracy of the undiscounted future cash flows analysis.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the partners of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P and subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.


F-4

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)


  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870
 15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623
 12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 

 


Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 309
 428
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 10,768
 9,675
Additional paid-in capital 13,251,962
 12,615,472
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (27,670) (1,280)
Accumulated deficit (6,399,626) (5,467,236)
Total stockholders’ equity 6,835,743
 7,157,059
Non-controlling interests 7,535
 143,085
Total equity 6,843,278
 7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254

996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net
11,752

(164,237)
(197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes
(302,844)
(86,624)
58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106)
(91,725)
51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106) (88,030) 32,378
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 6,753
 2,256
 (560)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(300,353)
$(85,774)
$31,818
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-6

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income (27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income (334,543) (85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests(1)
 7,800
 2,200
 (534)
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(326,743) $(83,485) $30,805

(1)Represents comprehensive loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-7

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for share data)

  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,146,650
 $9,741
 $12,640,171
 $(2,556) $(4,200,423) $8,447,361
 $172,172
 $8,619,533
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (68,759) (1) (517) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,550) (2) (2,146) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 399,242
 4
 16,750
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) (535,657) 
 (535,657)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,227) (13,227)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 (571) (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 31,818
 560
 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (1,013) (26) (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,208,583
 $9,742
 $12,654,258
 $(3,569) $(4,776,581) $7,884,278
 $158,598
 $8,042,876
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 32,439
 
 241
 
 
 241
 (241) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (7,206,876) (72) (50,082) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (324,502) (2) (2,324) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 805,521
 7
 13,307
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) (532,144) 
 (532,144)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,048) (13,048)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 72
 
 (989) (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) (85,774) (2,256) (88,030)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 2,289
 56
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138
 $428
 967,515,165
 $9,675
 $12,615,472
 $(1,280) $(5,467,236) $7,157,059
 $143,085
 $7,300,144
Issuance of Common Stock, net 
 
 108,410,070
 1,084
 1,013,131
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 130,291
 1
 1,166
 
 
 1,167
 (1,167) 


F-8

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for share data)


  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Conversion of Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 $1
 
 $
 $922
 $
 $
 $923
 $(923) $
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (120) 
 
 (300,002) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (200,331) (2) (1,616) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 990,789
 10
 13,091
 
 
 13,101
 
 13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) (562,195) 
 (562,195)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,494) (9,494)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 117
 
 (1,445) (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (68,397) (68,397) (91) (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 (91,920) 
 
 (91,920) (126,590) (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of equity 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 
 2,071
 (2,071) 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) (300,353) (6,753) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (26,390) (1,047) (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246

$309

1,076,845,984

$10,768

$13,251,962

$(27,670)
$(6,399,626)
$6,835,743

$7,535

$6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-9

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:    
  
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity-based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities and gain on joint venture (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603) 493,914

793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119

(274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-10

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398) (655,406)
(756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663

$61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-11

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870

15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623

12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 


 


General Partner's preferred equity, 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 General Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 460,504
 710,325
General Partner's common equity, 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 6,375,239
 6,446,734
Limited Partner's preferred equity, 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 1,869
 2,883
Limited Partner's common equity, 786,719 and 23,715,908 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 4,433
 138,931
Total partners’ equity 6,842,045

7,298,873
Non-controlling interests 1,233
 1,271
Total equity 6,843,278

7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-12

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per unit data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254
 996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net 11,752

(164,237) (197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes (302,844)
(86,624) 58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106) (91,725) 51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106)
(88,030) 32,378
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP $(307,004)
$(87,876) $32,572
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-13

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income
(334,543)
(85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the OP
$(334,441)
$(85,531) $31,533

(1)Represents comprehensive loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-14

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $853,821
 86,874
 $3,171
 974,146,650
 $7,593,540
 23,748,347
 $166,598

$8,617,130
 $2,403

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (68,759) (518) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,550) (2,148) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 399,242
 16,754
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) 
 (13,060) (548,717) (167) (548,884)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (571) 
 
 (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 
 754
 32,572
 (194) 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (26) (1,039) 
 (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138

$782,073

86,874

$3,027

974,208,583

$7,102,205

23,748,347

$154,266

$8,041,571

$1,305

$8,042,876
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 32,439
 241
 (32,439) (241) 
 
 
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (7,206,876) (50,154) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (324,502) (2,326) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 805,521
 13,314
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) 
 (13,048) (545,192) 
 (545,192)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (917) 
 
 (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) 
 (2,102) (87,876) (154) (88,030)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 56
 2,345
 
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138

$710,325

86,874

$2,883

967,515,165

$6,446,734

23,715,908

$138,931

$7,298,873

$1,271

$7,300,144
Issuance of common OP Units, net 
 
 
 
 108,410,070
 1,014,215
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 130,291
 1,167
 (130,291) (1,167) 
 
 
Conversion of Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 923
 (37,108) (923) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (182,347) 
 
 
 (117,775) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (200,331) (1,618) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)


F-15

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Equity-based compensation, net 
 $
 
 $
 990,789
 $13,101
 
 $
 $13,101
 $
 $13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) 
 (9,494) (571,689) 
 (571,689)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (1,328) 
 
 (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (68,397) 
 (91) 
 
 
 
 (68,488) 
 (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
 
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 
 (91,920) (22,798,898) (126,590) (218,510) 
 (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of capital 
 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 (2,071) 
 
 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) 
 (6,651) (307,004) (102) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (1,047) (27,437) 
 (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246
 $460,504
 49,766
 $1,869
 1,076,845,984
 $6,375,239
 786,719
 $4,433
 $6,842,045
 $1,233
 $6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-16

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603)
493,914
 793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119
 (274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-17

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398)
(655,406) (756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019


Note 1 – Organization
VEREIT is a Maryland corporation, incorporated on December 2, 2010, that qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. The OP is a Delaware limited partnership of which the General Partner is the sole general partner. VEREIT’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and its 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to VEREIT, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP.
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties. The Company actively manages its portfolio considering a number of metrics including property type, concentration and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity.
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through the OP. VEREIT is the sole general partner and holder of 99.9% of the common equity interests in the OP as of December 31, 2019. Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding common units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP Units”) or Series F Preferred Units of limited partnership interests in the OP (“Series F Preferred Units”), for a period of one year and meeting the other requirements in the LPA, unless we otherwise consent to an earlier redemption, holders have the right to redeem the units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, or, at our option, a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the LPA. The remaining rights of the holders of OP Units are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the General Partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP’s assets.
The actions of the OP and its relationship with the General Partner are governed by the LPA. The General Partner does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the OP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the General Partner and the OP are the same. Additionally, pursuant to the LPA, all administrative expenses and expenses associated with the formation, continuity, existence and operation of the General Partner incurred by the General Partner on the OP’s behalf shall be treated as expenses of the OP. Further, when the General Partner issues any equity instrument that has been approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors, the LPA requires the OP to issue to the General Partner equity instruments with substantially similar terms, to protect the integrity of the Company’s umbrella partnership REIT structure, pursuant to which each holder of interests in the OP has a proportionate economic interest in the OP reflecting its capital contributions thereto. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to the General Partner are referred to as “General Partner OP Units” and “General Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to parties other than the General Partner are referred to as “Limited Partner OP Units” and “Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. The LPA also provides that the OP issue debt with terms and provisions consistent with debt issued by the General Partner. The LPA will be amended to provide for the issuance of any additional class of equivalent equity instruments to the extent the General Partner’s Board of Directors authorizes the issuance of any new class of equity securities.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting
The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and a consolidated joint venture. The portion of the consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company is presented as non-controlling interest in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. In addition, as described in Note 1 – Organization and Note 12 – Equity, certain third parties have been issued OP Units and Series F Preferred Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Equity is reallocated between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP upon a change in ownership. At the end of each reporting period, noncontrolling interests in the OP are adjusted to reflect their ownership percentage in the OP through a reallocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP, as applicable. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were approximately 0.8 million and 23.7 million Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding, respectively, and 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding, respectively.
For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity.
The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.
Reclassification
The (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net line item has been combined into other income, net for prior periods presented to be consistent with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments, real estate investment impairment, allocation of purchase price of real estate asset acquisitions and income taxes.
Real Estate Investments
The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for intangible lease assets.

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their relative fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, fixtures and improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above-market and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases. In estimating fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the initial term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease, then the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to expense.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, including any bargain renewal periods. Above-market leases are amortized as a reduction to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may result in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions were capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as described above. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Assets Held for Sale
Upon classifying a real estate investment as held for sale, the Company will no longer recognize depreciation expense related to the depreciable assets of the property. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion regarding properties held for sale.
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Company will reclassify the property as held and used. The Company measures and records a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (i) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (ii) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Development Activities
Project costs, which include interest expense, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives.

F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Discontinued Operations
The Company reports discontinued operations when a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 14 —Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financing policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the joint ventures’ earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the unconsolidated joint ventures in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Investment in Cole REITs
On February 1, 2018, the Company sold certain of its equity investments to CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC, retaining interests retaining interests in Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”). Subsequent to the sale of Cole Capital, the Company carries these investments at fair value, as the Company does not exert significant influence over CCIT II, CCIT III or CCPT V, and any changes in the fair value are recognized in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.Prior to the sale of Cole Capital, the Company accounted for these investments using the equity method of accounting, which required the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the respective Cole REIT’s earnings and distributions. The Company recorded its proportionate share of net income or loss from the Cole REITs in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
The Company leases its corporate office facilities under operating leases. Leasehold improvements related to these are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life or remaining lease term.
Property and equipment, which typically include computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, among other items, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. The Company reassesses the useful lives of its property and equipment and adjusts the future monthly depreciation expense based on the new useful life, as applicable. If the Company disposes of an asset, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are written off upon disposal.
Goodwill
In the case of a business combination, after identifying all tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, the excess consideration paid over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and assumed, respectively, represents goodwill. In connection with prior mergers, the Company recorded goodwill as a result of the merger consideration exceeding the net assets acquired. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of goodwill was $1.3 billion.

F-22

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Impairments
Real Estate Assets
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators that the Company considers include, but are not limited to, decrease in net operating income, bankruptcy or other credit concerns of a property’s major tenant or tenants, such as history of late payments, rental concessions and other factors, as well as significant decreases in a property’s revenues due to lease terminations, vacancies, co-tenancy clauses or reduced lease rates. When impairment indicators are identified or if a property is considered to have a more likely than not probability of being disposed of within the next 12 to 24 months, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. U.S. GAAP requires us to utilize the Company’s expected holding period of our properties when assessing recoverability. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales or leasing transactions. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of real estate assets are discussed in Note 5 – Fair Value Measures.
Goodwill
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. To determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test, the Company first assesses qualitative factors, including, but not limited to macro-economic conditions such as deterioration in the entity's operating environment or industry or market considerations; entity-specific events such as increasing costs, declining financial performance, or loss of key personnel; or other events such as an expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or a sustained decrease in the stock price on either an absolute basis or relative to peers. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50% chance) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no quantitative testing is required. If it is determined, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, the provisions of guidance require that the Company then compares the fair value to the carrying value. Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying value exceeds the fair value.
The Company performed the annual qualitative assessment for goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2019. As a result of the qualitative testing, the Company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the goodwill is greater than the carrying value. As such, no further testing was performed. The Company performed a quantitative analysis for the annual goodwill tests during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, which also resulted in 0 impairments.
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company is required to determine whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of any of its investment in the unconsolidated joint ventures. If an event or change in circumstance has occurred, the Company is required to evaluate its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture for potential impairment and determine if the carrying value of its investment exceeds its fair value. An impairment charge is recorded when an impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. The evaluation of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain keyassumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions including, but not limited to, the following: (1) capitalization rate; (2) discount rates; (3) numbercould result in different conclusions. NaN impairments of years property will be held; (4) property operating expenses; and (5) re-leasing assumptions including number of months to re-lease, market rental income and required tenant improvements. There are inherent uncertainties in making these estimates such as market conditions and performance and sustainability of the Company’s tenants. For the Company’s impairment tests for the real estate assetsunconsolidated joint ventures were identified during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017,2019, 2018 and 2017.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
Leasehold improvements and property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If this review indicates that the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, the Company used a rangerecords an impairment loss, measured at fair value by estimated discounted cash flows or market appraisals. The evaluation of discount rates from 7.4%leasehold improvements and property and equipment for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to 7.8% with a weighted-average rateexercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of 7.5%different judgments and capitalization rates from 6.9% to 10.0% with a weighted-average rateassumptions could result in different conclusions. NaN impairments of 8.0%.leasehold improvements and property and equipment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.


F-42F-23

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts, as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. The following table presentsCompany deposits cash with several high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the impairment charges by asset class recorded duringFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit of $250,000. At times, the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 (dollarCompany’s cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured levels. Although the Company bears risk on amounts in thousands):excess of those insured by the FDIC, it has not experienced and does not anticipate any losses due to the high quality of the institutions where the deposits are held.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Properties impaired 69
 153
 202
       
Asset classes impaired:      
Investment in real estate assets, net $50,087
 $183,240
 $88,465
Investment in direct financing leases, net 553
 
 4,020
Below-market lease liabilities, net (92) (421) (730)
Total impairment loss $50,548
 $182,819
 $91,755
GoodwillRestricted Cash
The Company performed its annual testhad $21.0 million and $22.9 million, respectively, in restricted cash as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Restricted cash primarily consists of reserves related to lease expirations, as well as maintenance, structural and debt service reserves. In accordance with certain debt agreements, rent from certain of the goodwillCompany’s tenants is deposited directly into a lockbox account, from which the monthly debt service payments are disbursed to the lender and the excess funds are then disbursed to the Company. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2019 was $18.8 million in lender reserves and $2.2 million held in restricted lockbox accounts. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2018 was $21.5 million in lender reserves and $1.4 million held in restricted lockbox accounts.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for impairmentfinancing. Deferred financing costs, other than those associated with the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6 –Debt), are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Deferred financing costs related to the Revolving Credit Facility are included in rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in connection with potential financial transactions that are not completed are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not be completed.
Convertible Debt
The Company has an outstanding aggregate balance of $321.8 million related to the 2020 Convertible Notes (as defined in Note 6 –Debt ). The 2020 Convertible Notes are convertible into cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the Company’s option. In accordance with U.S GAAP, the 2020 Convertible Notes are accounted for as a liability with a separate equity component recorded for the conversion option. A liability was recorded for the 2020 Convertible Notes on the issuance date at fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current market rates for debt instruments with similar terms. The difference between the initial proceeds from the 2020 Convertible Notes and the estimated fair value of $15.1 billion, $18.3 billion and $19.7 billion at the 2017, 2016, and 2015 measurement dates, respectively, which exceededdebt instruments resulted in a debt discount, with an offset recorded to additional paid-in capital representing the carrying values by 8.1%, 21.0%, and 13.0% respectively. As such, no goodwill impairment was recorded duringequity component. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense over the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015 in income (loss) from continuing operations. If all other assumptions were held constant, increasingrespective term of the discount rate by 0.5% would decrease the amount that the 2017 fair value exceeds the 2017 carrying value from $1.1 billion to $385.0 million.2020 Convertible Notes.

Derivative Instruments
The Company estimatedmay use derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and forwards to hedge all or a portion of the fair value using bothinterest rate risk associated with its borrowings. The Company’s interest rate management objectives are intended to limit the incomeimpact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and market approach in evaluating goodwill for impairment. The assumptions utilized in the income approach include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates, future cash flows and discount rates.to manage the Company’s overall borrowing costs. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges are used to hedge forecasted issuances of fixed rate debt and the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt. The assumptions utilized inCompany does not intend to utilize derivatives for purposes other than interest rate risk management. The use of derivative financial instruments carries certain risks, including the market approach include, butrisk that the counterparties to these contractual arrangements are not limitedable to future cash flows,perform under the selectionagreements. To mitigate this risk, the Company only enters into derivative financial instruments with counterparties with high credit ratings and with major financial institutions with which the Company may also have other financial relationships. The Company does not anticipate that any of comparable companies and measures of operating results and pricing multiples. AFFO multiples for market comparable companies were usedthe counterparties will fail to estimate the fair value by applying those multiples to the projected financial information prepared by management. The uncertainties associated with the fair value assumptions for the goodwill are the same as the uncertainties for real estate assets.meet their obligations.


F-43F-24

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Note 10 – Debt
AsThe Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of December 31, 2017,derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company had $6.1 billionhas elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of debt outstanding, includingthe exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether each has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. If the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting treatment, any changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized immediately in other income, net premiumsin the consolidated statements of operations and net deferred financingconsolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). If the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, the change in fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized gains and losses in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to interest expense when the related hedged items impact earnings. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities for further discussion.
Leases
ASC 842 (effective January 1, 2019)
The adoption of ASC 842, effective January 1, 2019, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The most significant impact was the recognition of operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee. The Company did not have a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The lessor accounting model under ASC 842 is similar to existing guidance, however, it limits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, such as internally generated costs, and modifies the lease classification criteria through the elimination of "bright-line" tests.
The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under ASC 842 (which included: (i) an entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) an entity need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (iii) an entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases), the land easement practical expedient to carry forward existing accounting treatment on existing land easements, the practical expedient which allows a lessee to combine lease and non-lease components, and the short-term lease election that allows a lessee not to apply the balance sheet recognition requirements to leases with a weighted-average yearsterm of 12 months or less. The Company elected not to maturityapply the practical expedients related to hindsight or assessing impairment of 4.3 yearsROU assets.
Lessor (effective January 1, 2019)
At the inception of a new lease arrangement, including new leases that arise from amendments, the Company assesses the terms and conditions to determine the proper lease classification. When the terms of a weighted-average interest ratelease effectively transfer control of 4.2%. The following table summarizes the carryingunderlying asset, the lease is classified as a sales-type lease. When a lease does not effectively transfer control of the underlying asset to the lessee, but the Company obtains a guarantee for the value of debtthe asset from a third party, the Company classifies the lease as a direct financing lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company has acquired certain properties that are subject to leases that qualified as direct financing leases. Investments in direct financing leases represent the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term. The fair value of the remaining lease payments is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates that would represent the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt. The expected residual property value at the end of the lease term is estimated using market data and assessments of the remaining useful lives of the properties at the end of the lease terms, among other factors. Income from direct financing leases is calculated using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the lease. The Company does not have any sales-type leases as of December 31, 20172019.
For operating leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis, including the effect of any free rent periods, over the lease term when collectability of lease payments is probable. Variable lease payments are recognized as rental revenue in the period when the changes in facts and December 31, 2016,circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. Variable lease payments, including contingent rent, which is paid by a tenant when the tenant's sales exceed an agreed upon minimum amount, are recognized once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds and is calculated by multiplying the debt activity forsales in excess of the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease.

     Year Ended December 31, 2017   
   Balance as of December 31, 2016 Debt Issuances Repayments, Extinguishment and Assumptions Accretion and Amortization Balance as of December 31, 2017 
Mortgage notes payable:           
 Outstanding balance $2,629,949
 $4,652
 $(563,563)
$
 $2,071,038
(1) 
 
Net premiums (2)
 36,751
 
 (526) (11,573) 24,652
 
 Deferred costs (16,633) (88) 883
 2,840
 (12,998) 
Other debt:         

 
 Outstanding balance 20,947
 
 (20,947) 
 
 
 
Premium (2)
 92
 
 (17) (75) 
 
Mortgages and other debt, net 2,671,106

4,564

(584,170)
(8,808)
2,082,692
 
Corporate bonds:         

 
 Outstanding balance 2,250,000
 600,000
 
 
 2,850,000
 
 
Discount (3)
 (1,937) 
 
 705
 (1,232) 
 Deferred costs (21,839) (9,485) 
 4,050
 (27,274) 
Corporate bonds, net 2,226,224

590,515



4,755

2,821,494
 
Convertible debt:         

 
 Outstanding balance 1,000,000
 
 
 
 1,000,000
 
 
Discount (3)
 (12,894) 
 
 5,112
 (7,782) 
 Deferred costs (13,766) 
 
 5,806
 (7,960) 
Convertible debt, net 973,340





10,918

984,258
 
Credit facility:         

 
 Outstanding balance 500,000
 329,000
 (644,000) 
 185,000
 
 
Deferred costs (4)
 (3,422) 
 2,030
 1,392
 
 
Credit facility, net 496,578

329,000

(641,970)
1,392

185,000
 
           

 
Total debt $6,367,248

$924,079

$(1,226,140)
$8,257

$6,073,444
 

(1)Includes $16.2 million related to one mortgage note payable in default.
(2)Net premiums on mortgage notes payable and other debt were recorded upon the assumption of the respective debt instruments in relation to the various mergers and acquisitions. Amortization of these net premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(3)Discounts on the corporate bonds and convertible debt were recorded based upon the fair value of the respective debt instruments as of the respective issuance dates. Amortization of these discounts is recorded as an increase to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(4)Deferred costs relate to the term portion of the credit facility, which was repaid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

F-44F-25

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The Company, as lessor, identified three separate lease components as follows: i) land lease component, ii) single property lease component comprised of building, land improvements and tenant improvements, and iii) furniture and fixtures. The Company’s leases also contain provisions for tenants to reimburse the Company for real estate taxes and insurance, which are considered noncomponents of the lease, and maintenance and other property operating expenses, which are considered to be non-lease components. The Company elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components and the non-lease components will be included with the single property lease component as the predominant component.
The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent, straight-line rent and property operating expense reimbursements and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. The review includes a binary assessment of whether or not substantially all of the amounts due under a tenant’s lease agreement are probable of collection. For leases that are deemed probable of collection, revenue continues to be recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For leases that are deemed not probable of collection, revenue is recorded as cash is received. The Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental income and does not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts.
Rental revenue also includes lease termination income collected from tenants to allow for the tenant to vacate their space prior to their scheduled termination dates, as well as amortization of above and below-market leases.
Lessee (effective January 1, 2019)
To account for leases for which the Company is the lessee, contracts must be analyzed upon inception to determine if the arrangement is, or contains, a lease. A lease conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Lease classification tests and measurement procedures are performed at the lease commencement date.
The lease liability is initially measured as the present value of the lease payments over the lease term, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate is readily determinable; otherwise, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used. The incremental borrowing rate is determined based on the estimated rate of interest that the lessee would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. The lease term is the noncancelable period of the lease and includes any renewal and termination options the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. The lease liability balance is amortized using the effective interest method. The lease liability is remeasured when the contract is modified, upon the resolution of a contingency such that variable payments become fixed or if the assessment of exercising an extension, termination or purchase option changes.
The ROU asset balance is initially measured as the lease liability amount, adjusted for any lease payments made prior to the commencement date, initial direct costs, estimated costs to dismantle, remove, or restore the underlying asset and incentives received.
The Company’s impairment assessment for ROU assets is consistent with the impairment analysis for the Company's other long-lived assets and is reviewed quarterly.
Policy applicable to periods prior to January 1, 2019
The accounting policy for leases in which the Company is the lessor or lessee prior to the adoption of ASC 842 can be found in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenues generated through leasing arrangements are within the scope of ASC 842, as discussed above, and are excluded from Topic 606.
Revenue Recognition - Cole Capital
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The assets, liabilities and related financial results of substantially all of the Cole Capital segment are reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations.

F-26

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Cole Capital earned securities sales commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution and stockholder servicing fees, real estate acquisition fees, financing coordination fees, property management fees, advisory fees, asset management fees and performance fees for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment and management of their respective assets, in accordance with the respective dealer manager and advisory agreements. The Company was also reimbursed for certain costs incurred in providing these services, which were recorded as revenue as the expenses were incurred subject to revenue constraint due to the limitations on the amount that was reimbursable based on the terms of the respective dealer manager and advisory agreements. Refer to Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangementsfor a disaggregation of Cole Capital revenues.
The Company entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with the Cole Purchaser, pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole Purchaser and the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support, (“Transition Services Revenues”) through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year). Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Company will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided. The Company recorded Transition Services Revenues as costs associated with providing such services were incurred, which coincided with the timing in which the performance obligations of the contract had been met. During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company incurred $2.1 million of such costs and recognized revenues of $2.4 million, including acquisition fees, and during the period from February 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, the Company incurred $15.0 million of such costs and recognized revenues of $15.0 million, which are recorded in other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company may also earn additional fees in each calendar year through December 31, 2023 if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold in a calendar year (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
Litigation and non-routine costs, net
The Company has incurred legal fees and other costs associated with litigations and investigations resulting from the Audit Committee Investigation (defined below), which are considered non-routine. The Company’s insurance carriers have paid certain defense costs subject to standard reservation of rights under the respective policies.
Litigation and non-routine costs, net include the following costs and recoveries (amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Litigation and non-routine costs, net:      
Audit Committee Investigation and related matters (1)
 $70,168
 $59,755
 $49,434
Legal fees and expenses (2)
 2
 530
 421
Litigation settlements (3)
 820,208
 233,246
 
Merger related transfer taxes(4)
 
 
 (1,595)
Total costs 890,378

293,531

48,260
Insurance recoveries (5)
 (48,420) (2,568) (300)
Other recoveries (6)
 (26,536) 
 
Total $815,422
 $290,963
 $47,960
___________________________________
(1)Includes all fees and costs associated with various litigations and investigations prompted by the results of the 2014 investigation conducted by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”), including fees and costs incurred pursuant to the Company’s advancement obligations, litigation related thereto and in connection with related insurance recovery matters, net of accrual reversals.
(2)Includes legal fees and expenses associated with litigation resulting from prior mergers and excludes amounts presented in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
(3)Refer to Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.
(4)The negative balance for the year ended December 31, 2017 is a result of estimated costs accrued in prior periods that exceeded actual expenses incurred.
(5)$2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 relates to litigation resulting from prior mergers.
(6)Represents the surrender of 2.9 million Limited Partner OP Units. Refer to Note 12 – Equity for additional information.

F-27

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Loss Contingencies
The Company records a liability in the consolidated financial statements for loss contingencies when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of a known or probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount of the range is accrued. If a material loss is reasonably possible but not known or probable, and is reasonably estimable, the estimated loss or range of loss is disclosed. 
Equity-based Compensation
The Company has an equity-based incentive award plan (the “Equity Plan”) for non-executive directors, officers, other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under U.S. GAAP for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met. See Note 13– Equity-based Compensation for additional information on these plans.
Restructuring
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s obligation to provide certain initial transition services for the Cole Purchaser terminated in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement and the Company recorded $10.5 million of restructuring expenses related to the reorganization of its business, of which $9.2 million related to office lease terminations and modifications and $1.8 million related to the cessation of services under the Services Agreement, including severance, net of ASC 842 operating lease adjustments of $0.5 million. NaN restructuring expenses were recorded prior to January 1, 2019 in connection with the sale.
Per Share Data
Income (loss) per basic share of Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) less dividends on unvested restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”) and dividends on preferred stock by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted income (loss) per share of Common Stock considers the effect of potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period.
Income Taxes
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019. As a REIT, the General Partner is generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). However, the General Partner, its taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) entities, and the OP are still subject to certain state and local income, franchise and property taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. The General Partner may also be subject to federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
The OP is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the OP is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the OP is required to include its allocable share of the OP’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. Under the LPA, the OP is to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS until it sold the Cole Capital business on February 1, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company conducted all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and filed income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to routine examinations by taxing authorities for years before 2015. Certain of the Company’s intercompany transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with current authoritative accounting and tax guidance. The tax provision or benefit related to significant or unusual items is recognized in the quarter in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the quarter in which the change occurs. The accounting

F-28

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

estimates used to compute the provision for or benefit from income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized state and local income and franchise tax expense of $4.3 million, $4.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively, which are included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company recorded a provision for federal income taxes of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to a TRS entity, which is also included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. NaN provision for federal income taxes related to a TRS entity was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2017. The provision for or benefit from income taxes attributable to the Cole Capital business, substantially all of which was conducted through a TRS entity, is included in discontinued operations for all periods presented, as discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations.
The Company had 0 unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019, the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance, intended to clarify and improve certain topics, under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05 and ASU 2019-11 (collectively Topic 326). Topic 326 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income and requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in Topic 326 require the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminates the “incurred loss” methodology under current U.S. GAAP. The effective date for Topic 326 is for fiscal years (including the interim periods therein) beginning after December 15, 2019. Topic 326 must be adopted by applying a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company does not expect Topic 326 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption during the first quarter of 2020.

F-29

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles
Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company acquired controlling financial interests in 66 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $403.6 million (the “2019 Acquisitions”), which includes $2.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized. Additionally, the Company placed in service 1 build-to-suit development project in which the Company invested $27.6 million, including $0.7 million of external acquisition-related expenses and interest that were capitalized and including the land parcel acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired a controlling interest in 52 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $502.7 million (the “2018 Acquisitions”), which includes one land parcel for build-to-suit development, $2.1 million related to an outstanding tenant improvement allowance and $2.6 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company acquired a controlling interest in 88 commercial properties and 3 land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million (the “2017 Acquisitions”), which includes $3.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized and includes 22 properties acquired in a nonmonetary exchange discussed below.
The following table presents the allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the periods presented (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Real estate investments, at cost:      
Land $83,476
 $86,285
 $110,634
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 268,470
 350,942
 523,445
Total tangible assets 351,946
 437,227
 634,079
Acquired intangible assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles (1)
 51,627
 62,791
 105,940
Above-market leases (2)
 
 2,750
 10,445
Assumed intangible liabilities:      
Below-market leases (3)
 
 (116) (1,680)
Total purchase price of assets acquired $403,573
 $502,652
 $748,784

(1)The weighted average amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles is 16.5 years, 16.3 years and 15.8 years for 2019 Acquisitions, 2018 Acquisitions and 2017 Acquisitions, respectively.
(2)The weighted average amortization period for acquired above-market leases is 10.8 years and 18.0 years for 2018 Acquisitions and 2017 Acquisitions, respectively.
(3)The weighted average amortization period for assumed intangible lease liabilities is 9.9 years and 13.8 years for 2018 Acquisitions and 2017 Acquisitions, respectively.
Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company disposed of 201 properties, including the sale of 6 consolidated properties to 2 newly-formed joint ventures in which the Company owns a 20% equity interest (the “Industrial Partnership”) and 1 property sold through a foreclosure as discussed in Note 6 –Debt, for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.2 billion, of which our share was $1.1 billion after the profit participation payments related to the disposition of 36 Red Lobster properties. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $1.1 billion after closing costs and contributions to the Industrial Partnership. The Company recorded a gain of $293.9 million related to the dispositions, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company disposed of 149 properties, including 1 property conveyed to a lender in a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, for an aggregate gross sales price of $526.4 million, of which our share was $504.3 million after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 34 Red Lobster properties. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $496.7 million after closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $96.2 million related to the sales which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

F-30

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company also disposed of 1 property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture for a gross sales price of $34.1 million, of which our share was $17.1 million based on our ownership interest in the joint venture, resulting in proceeds of $5.6 million after debt repayments of $20.4 million and closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $0.7 million related to the sale and liquidation of the joint venture, which is included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company disposed of 137 properties, including 1 property owned by a consolidated joint venture, 6 properties transferred to the lender in either a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction as discussed in Note 6 Debt and 15 properties disposed of in connection with a nonmonetary exchange discussed below, for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9 million, of which our share was $574.4 million after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 31 Red Lobster properties and the consolidated joint venture partner’s share of the sales price. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $445.5 million after a mortgage loan assumption of $66.0 million and closing costs. Additionally, the Company’s tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 included $1.7 million of Canadian tax gain on the sale of certain Canadian properties. The Company recorded a gain of $64.7 million, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 5 properties classified as held for sale with a carrying value of $27.0 million, included in real estate assets held for sale, net, primarily comprised of land of $6.3 million and building, fixtures and improvements, net of $19.8 million, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, which are expected to be sold in the next 12 months as part of the Company’s portfolio management strategy. As of December 31, 2018, there were 5 properties classified as held for sale. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded losses of $1.3 million, $1.9 million and $3.1 million respectively, related to held for sale properties.
Intangible Lease Assets and Liabilities
Intangible lease assets and liabilities of the Company consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted-average useful life):
  Weighted-Average Useful Life December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Intangible lease assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $748,689 and $703,909, respectively 15.9 $854,196
 $980,971
Leasing commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $6,027 and $4,048, respectively 10.1 17,808
 15,660
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of accumulated amortization of $112,438 and $105,936, respectively 16.3 165,483
 201,875
Total intangible lease assets, net   $1,037,487
 $1,198,506
       
Intangible lease liabilities:      
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $99,315 and $89,905, respectively 19.1 $143,583
 $173,479

The aggregate amount of amortization of above‑ and below-market leases and deferred lease incentives included as a net decrease to rental revenue was $2.5 million, $4.2 million and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The aggregate amount of in-place leases, leasing commissions and other lease intangibles amortized and included in depreciation and amortization expense was $127.5 million, $139.6 million and $154.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

F-31

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)


The following table provides the projected amortization expense and adjustments to rental revenue related to the intangible lease assets and liabilities for the next five years as of December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
In-place leases and other intangibles:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense $116,812
 $108,990
 $95,237
 $84,843
 $74,347
Leasing commissions:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense 2,361
 2,203
 2,102
 1,827
 1,612
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives:        
Total projected to be deducted from rental revenue 19,301
 18,876
 18,064
 17,120
 15,749
Below-market lease liabilities:          
Total projected to be included in rental revenue 16,840
 15,189
 13,497
 12,774
 10,927

Nonmonetary Exchange
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed a nonmonetary exchange through the simultaneous acquisition of 22 Bob Evans properties and disposition of 15 Red Lobster properties. Pursuant to Nonmonetary Transactions, ASC (Topic 845), the cost of a nonmonetary asset acquired in exchange for another nonmonetary asset is the fair value of the asset surrendered to obtain the acquired nonmonetary asset, and a gain or loss should be recognized on the exchange. The fair value of the asset received should be used to measure the cost if the fair value of the asset received is more reliable than the fair value of the asset surrendered. The Company estimated the fair value of the Bob Evans and Red Lobster properties using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach and concluded that the fair value was $50.1 million. As the fair value of the assets received exceeded the book value of the assets surrendered, the Company recorded a gain of $7.4 million, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Consolidated Joint Ventures
The Company had an interest in 1 consolidated joint venture that owned 1 property as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. As of each of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the consolidated joint venture had total assets of $32.5 million, of which $29.6 million and $29.9 million, respectively, were real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization at each of the respective dates. The property is secured by a mortgage note payable, which is non-recourse to the Company and had a balance of $14.3 million and $14.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company has the ability to control operating and financing policies of the consolidated joint venture. There are restrictions on the use of these assets as the Company would generally be required to obtain the approval of the joint venture partner in accordance with the joint venture agreement for any major transactions. The Company and the joint venture partner are subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint ventures consisted of interests in the Industrial Partnership and 1 unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2019 and an interest in 1 unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company disposed of 1 property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture as previously discussed in the “Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale” section herein.
The unconsolidated joint ventures had total aggregate debt outstanding of $269.3 million as of December 31, 2019, which is non-recourse to the Company, as discussed in Note 6 –Debt. There was 0 debt outstanding related to the unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2018.
The Company and the respective unconsolidated joint venture partners are subject to the provisions of the applicable joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls, including the Company’s share of expansion project capital expenditures. The following is a summary of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

F-32

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

      
Carrying Amount of Investment (1)
 
Equity in Income (2)
       Year Ended
Investment 
Ownership % (3)
 Number of Properties December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Faison JV Bethlehem GA 90% 1 $40,416
 $35,289
 $2,364
 $1,219
 $3,068
Industrial Partnership 20% 6 $28,409
 $
 $254
 $
 $

(1)The total carrying amount of the investments was greater than the underlying equity in net assets by $4.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. This difference relates to a purchase price allocation of goodwill and a step up in fair value of the investment assets acquired in connection with mergers. The step up in fair value was allocated to the individual investment assets and is being amortized in accordance with the Company’s depreciation policy.
(2)During the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities from the unconsolidated joint venture which disposed of its property during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(3)The Company’s ownership interest reflects its legal ownership interest. Legal ownership may, at times, not equal the Company’s economic interest in the listed properties because of various provisions in certain joint venture agreements regarding distributions of cash flow based on capital account balances, allocations of profits and losses and payments of preferred returns. As a result, the Company’s actual economic interest (as distinct from its legal ownership interest) in certain of the properties could fluctuate from time to time and may not wholly align with its legal ownership interests.
Note 4 –Rent and Tenant Receivables and Other Assets, Net
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Straight-line rent receivable, net (1)
 $266,195
 $259,106
Accounts receivable, net (1)
 41,556
 36,939
Deferred costs, net (2)
 7,208
 17,515
Investment in direct financing leases, net 9,341
 13,254
Investment in Cole REITs (3)
 7,552
 7,844
Prepaid expenses 3,453
 5,022
Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net (4)
 4,809
 9,754
Other assets, net 8,281
 16,658
Total $348,395

$366,092
___________________________________
(1)As of December 31, 2018, allowance for uncollectible accounts included in straight-line rent receivable, net and accounts receivable, net was $1.0 million and $5.3 million, respectively. Upon adoption of ASC 842, the Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental revenue and does not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Any recoveries for those receivables reserved prior to adoption of ASC 842 will be recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue.
(2)Amortization expense for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facilities totaled $2.1 million, $7.3 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, inclusive of write-offs of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no related write-offs for the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017. Accumulated amortization for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facilities was $49.8 million and $47.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
(3)
On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of Cole Capital (as described in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations), retaining interests in CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V.
(4)
Amortization expense for leasehold improvements totaled $0.7 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2019 with no related write-offs and $1.2 millionfor each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, with no related write-offs. Accumulated amortization was $2.8 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Depreciation expense for property and equipment totaled $1.3 million, $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, inclusive of write-offs of less than $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Accumulated depreciation was $5.4 million and $7.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company disposed of $4.3 million, net, of leasehold improvements, property and equipment, which is included in restructuring expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.

F-33

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 5 – Fair Value Measures
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. U.S. GAAP guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. The Company does not expect that changes in classifications between levels will be frequent.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall (in thousands):


Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Assets:







Derivative assets
$
 $250
 $

$250
Investment in Cole REITs 
 
 7,552
 7,552
Total assets $
 $250
 $7,552
 $7,802
Liabilities:        
Derivative liabilities
$
 $(28,081) $

$(28,081)



Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2018
Assets:        
Derivative assets $
 $544
 $
 $544
Investment in Cole REITs 
 
 7,844
 7,844
Total assets $
 $544
 $7,844
 $8,388

Derivative Assets and Liabilities The Company’s derivative financial instruments relate to interest rate swaps. The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.

F-34

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investment in Cole REITs The fair values of CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V were estimated using the net asset value per share. Each of the Cole REIT’s share redemption programs includes restrictions that limit the number of shares redeemed by the respective Cole REIT.
The following are reconciliations of the changes in assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Investment in Cole REITs
Beginning balance, January 1, 2019 $7,844
Unrealized loss included in other income, net (292)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2019 $7,552
The following are reconciliations of the changes in assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
  Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Investment in Cole REITs
Beginning balance, January 1, 2018 $40,974
 $3,264
Total gains and losses    
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income, net (205) 
Realized loss included in other income, net (34) 
Unrealized gain included in other income, net 
 5,102
Purchases, issuance, settlements    
Return of principal received (4,864) 
Amortization included in net income, net 157
 
Sale of investments (36,028) (522)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2018 $
 $7,844

Mortgage Notes PayableConvertible Debt
The Company’s mortgage notes payable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Encumbered Properties 
Gross Carrying Value of Collateralized Properties (1)
 Outstanding Balance 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate (6)
 
Weighted-Average Years to Maturity (5)
Fixed-rate debt (3)
 471
 $4,119,850
 $2,056,097
 4.92% 4.1
Variable-rate debt 1
 32,886
 14,941
 4.75%
(2) 
0.6
Total (4)
 472
 $4,152,736
 $2,071,038
 4.92% 4.1

(1)Gross carrying value is gross real estate assets, including investment in direct financing leases, net of gross real estate liabilities.
(2)Weighted-average interest rate for variable-rate debt represents the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2017.
(3)Includes $78.9 million of variable-rate debt fixed by way of interest rate swap arrangements. 
(4)The table above does not include the loan amount associated with an Unconsolidated Joint Venture of $20.4 million, none of which is recourse to the Company. The loan has a secured fixed rate of 5.20% and a maturity of July 2021.
(5)Weighted average years remaining to maturity is computed using the anticipated repayment date as specified in each loan agreement, where applicable.
(6)Weighted average interest rate is computed using the interest rate in effect until the anticipated repayment date. Should the loan not be repaid at the anticipated repayment date, the applicable interest rate shall increase as specified in the respective loan agreement until the extended maturity date.
The Company’s mortgage loan agreements generally restrict corporate guaranteesSummary and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios). The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. At December 31, 2017, except for the loan in default described below, the Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company repaid mortgage notes payable resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million in each year, due to the write-off of unamortized premiums, net of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties, which are included in (loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $16.2 million related to one outstanding mortgage note payable in default. The Company is engaged with the servicer to determine a method of settlement.
On August 31, 2017, the Company entered into a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement with the lender of a mortgage loan secured by one property, with an outstanding balance of $41.6 million on the date of agreement and conveyed its interest in the property to satisfy the mortgage loan. As a result of the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, the Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of $6.7 million, which is included in gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
On August 29, 2017, the Company completed the foreclosure sale of one property secured by a mortgage loan and was relieved of all obligations on the non-recourse loan. On the date of the foreclosure sale, the mortgage loan had an outstanding balance of $20.5 million. The Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of $4.8 million, which is included in gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as a result of the transaction.
On June 27, 2017, the Company entered into a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement with the lender of a mortgage loan, secured by four properties, with an outstanding balance of $38.3 million and conveyed all interests in the properties to satisfy the mortgage loan. As a result of the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, the Company recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt of $9.0 million, which is included in gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
On December 30, 2016, the Company received a notice of default from the lender of a non-recourse loan secured by 16 properties, which had an outstanding balance of $11.6 million on the notice date, due to the Company's intentional non-repayment of the loan balance at maturity. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company cured the default by fully repaying the outstanding loan balance.

F-45

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table summarizes the scheduled aggregate principal repayments due on mortgage notes subsequent to December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
  Total
2018 (1)
 $98,450
2019 222,789
2020 265,186
2021 352,770
2022 314,839
Thereafter 817,004
Total $2,071,038

(1)Includes $16.2 million, excluding accrued interest, related to one mortgage note payable in default.
Other DebtObligations
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding principal balancerepurchased $80.7 million of the secured term loan from KBC Bank, N.V. ( the “KBC Loan”).
Corporate Bonds
2020 Convertible Notes and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon. As of December 31, 2017, the OP had $2.85 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Senior Notes”) outstanding comprised of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Outstanding Balance December 31, 2017 Interest Rate Maturity Date
2019 Senior Notes $750,000
 3.000% February 6, 2019
2021 Senior Notes 400,000
 4.125% June 1, 2021
2024 Senior Notes 500,000
 4.600% February 6, 2024
2026 Senior Notes 600,000
 4.875% June 1, 2026
2027 Senior Notes 600,000
 3.950% August 15, 2027
Total balance and weighted-average interest rate $2,850,000
 4.033%  
On August 11, 2017,2019, the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0had $321.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 3.950% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Senior Notes”) (the offering of the 2027 Senior Notes, the “2017 Bond Offering”).
On June 2, 2016, the Company closed its senior note offering, consisting of (i) $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% Senior Notes due June 1, 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) and (ii) $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due June 1, 2026 (the “2026 Senior Notes”) (the offering of the 2021 Senior Notes, collectively with the 2026 Senior Notes.
On July 5, 2016, the Company redeemed $1.3 billion aggregate principal amount of 2.000% senior notes due 2017 (the “2017 Senior Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon and the required make-whole premium. Upon consummation of these transactions, the Company had no 2017 Senior2020 Convertible Notes outstanding. The Company recorded a loss relatedOP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the early extinguishment of $13.2 million which is included in (loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Senior Notes are guaranteed by the General Partner. The OP may redeem all or a part of any seriesThere were no changes to the terms of the Senior2020 Convertible Notes at any time, at its option, forduring the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Senior Notes. If the redemption date is 30 or fewer days prior to the maturity date with respect to theyear ended December 31, 2019 Senior Notes and the 2021 Senior Notes or is 90 or fewer days prior to the maturity date with respect to the 2024 Senior Notes, the 2026 Senior Notes and the 2027 Senior Notes, the redemption price will equal 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes of the applicable series to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. The Senior Notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) and are freely transferable.

F-46

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The indenture governing our Senior Notes requires us to maintain financial ratios which include maintaining (i) a maximum limitation on incurrence of total debt less than or equal to 65% of Total Assets (as defined in the indenture), (ii) maximum limitation on incurrence of secured debt less than or equal to 40% of Total Assets (as defined in the indenture), (iii) a minimum debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.5x and (iv) a minimum unencumbered asset value of at least 150% of the aggregate principal amount of all of the outstanding Unsecured Debt (as defined in the indenture). The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the Senior2020 Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Convertible Debt
The following table presentsSummary and Obligations
During the Company’s $597.5year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased $80.7 million of the 2020 Convertible Notes and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $321.8 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2018 (the “2018 Convertible Notes”) and $402.5 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes duethe 2020 (the “2020 Convertible Notes” and, together with the 2018 Convertible Notes the “Convertible Notes”) with their respective terms (dollar amounts in thousands).outstanding. The OP has issued corresponding identical convertible notes to the General Partner.
  
Outstanding Balance (1)
 Interest Rate
 
Conversion Rate (2)
 Maturity Date
2018 Convertible Notes $597,500
 3.00% 60.5997
 August 1, 2018
2020 Convertible Notes 402,500
 3.75% 66.7249
 December 15, 2020
Total balance and weighted-average interest rate $1,000,000
 3.30%    

(1)Excludes the carrying value of the conversion options recorded within additional paid-in capital of $28.6 million and the unamortized discount of $7.8 million as of December 31, 2017. The discount will be amortized over the remaining weighted average term of 1.5 years.
(2)Conversion rate represents the amount of the General Partner OP Units per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes converted as of December 31, 2017, as adjusted in accordance with the applicable indentures as a result of cash dividend payments.
The 2018 Convertible Notes may be converted into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof in limited circumstances prior to February 1, 2018 and may be converted into such consideration at any time on or after February 1, 2018. The 2020 Convertible Notes may be converted into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof, in limited circumstances prior to June 15, 2020, and may be converted into such consideration at any time on or after June 15, 2020. There were no changes to the terms of the 2020 Convertible Notes during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the 2020 Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2017.2019.
Credit Facility
The General Partner, as guarantor,Mortgage Notes Payable
Summary and the OP, as borrower, are parties to an unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) pursuant to a credit agreement, dated as of June 30, 2014, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as administrative agent and other lenders party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”).Obligations
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Credit FacilityCompany had an outstanding balancenon-recourse mortgage indebtedness of $185.0$1.5 billion, which was collateralized by 355 properties, reflecting a decrease from December 31, 2018 of $388.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily related to prepayments of mortgage notes payable. Our mortgage indebtedness bore interest at the weighted-average rate of 5.05% per annum and allowed for maximum borrowingshad a weighted-average maturity of $2.3 billion under its revolving credit facility, subject to borrowing availability. The maximum aggregate dollar amount of letters of credit that2.8 years. We may be outstanding at any one time under the Credit Facility is $25.0 million. The Operating Partnership used a portion of the proceeds from the 2017 Bond Offering discussed above to repay all of the outstanding borrowings, swap termination costs and accrued and unpaid interest, under the Credit Facility’s $0.5 billion term loan facility (the "Credit Facility Term Loan”) on August 11, 2017, resulting in the write-off of unamortized deferredfuture incur additional mortgage debt on the properties we currently own or use long-term non-recourse financing costs of $2.0 million, which is included in gain (loss) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.to acquire additional properties.
The revolving credit facility generally bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 1.00% to 1.80% or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.80% (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating). “Base Rate” is defined as the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or a floating rate based on one month LIBOR, determined on a daily basis. The Credit Facility Term Loan generally bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 1.15% to 2.05%, or Base Rate plus 0.15% to 1.05% (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating). In addition, the Credit Agreement provides the flexibility for interest rate auctions, pursuant to which, at the Company’s election, the Company may request that lenders make competitive bids to provide revolving loans, which competitive bids may be at pricing levels that differ from the foregoing interest rates.
The Credit Agreement provides for monthly interest payments under the Credit Facility. In the event of default, at the election of a majority of the lenders (or automatically upon a bankruptcy event of default with respect to the OP or the General Partner), the commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility will mature, and payment of any unpaid amounts in respect of the Credit Facility will be accelerated. The Credit Facility terminates on June 30, 2018, unless extended in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for a one-year extension option, exercisableour loan obligations vary. In general, only interest amounts are payable monthly with all unpaid principal and interest due at the Company’s electionmaturity. Some of our loan agreements require that we comply with specific reporting and financial covenants mainly related to debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Each loan that has these requirements has specific ratio thresholds that must be met.

Restrictions on Loan Covenants
F-47

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

subject to certain customary conditions, as well as certain customary “amend and extend” provisions. At any time, upon timely notice by the OP and subject to any breakage fees, the OP may prepay borrowings under the Credit Facility (subject to certain limitations applicable to the prepayment of any loans obtained through an interest rate auction, as described above). The OP incurs a fee equal to 0.15% to 0.25% per annum (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating) multiplied by the commitments (whether or not utilized) in respect of the revolving credit facility. In addition, the OP incurs customary administrative agent, letter of credit issuance, letter of credit fronting, extension and other fees.
The Credit Facility requires restrictions onOur mortgage loan obligations generally restrict corporate guarantees as well asand require the maintenance of financial covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios) and, as well as the maintenance of a minimum net worth. The key financial covenantsmortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the Credit Facility, as defined and calculated perevent of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the terms of the Credit Agreement, include maintaining (i) a maximum leverage ratio less than or equal to 60%, (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.5x, (iii) a secured leverage ratio less than or equal to 45%, (iv) a total unencumbered asset value ratio less than or equal to 60%, (v) a minimum tangible net worth covenant of at least $5.5 billion, (vi) a minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratio of at least 1.75x and (vii) a minimum unencumbered asset value of at least $8.0 billion (up to 30% of which may be comprised of restaurant properties from December 31, 2016 on).applicable thresholds. The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the Credit Agreement and is not restricted from accessing any borrowing availability under the Credit Facilitymortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends as of December 31, 2017.2019.
Derivative Activity
As discussed in Note 116Debt and Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million notional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, to hedge interest rate volatility. Due to an improvement in the Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company also entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $400.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 120 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on existing financial instruments), with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt.
Dividends
On November 5, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of Common Stock (equaling an annualized dividend of $0.55 per share) for the fourth quarter of 2019 to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2019, which was paid on January 15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP Unit.
Our Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in Note 12 – Equity to our consolidated financial statements, will pay cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis).

Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years More than 5 years
Principal payments - mortgage notes $1,529,057
 $188,385
 $588,466
 $745,238
 $6,968
Interest payments - mortgage notes (1)
 210,667
 74,251
 102,135
 33,154
 1,127
Principal payments - Credit Facility 1,050,000
 
 150,000
 900,000
 
Interest payments - Credit Facility (1) (2)
 119,683
 38,281
 72,246
 9,156
 
Principal payments - corporate bonds 2,850,000
 
 
 500,000
 2,350,000
Interest payments - corporate bonds 796,198
 119,988
 239,976
 219,212
 217,022
Principal payments - convertible debt 321,802
 321,802
 
 
 
Interest payments - convertible debt 11,531
 11,531
 
 
 
Operating and ground lease commitments 334,977
 22,287
 44,406
 42,827
 225,457
Other commitments (3)
 4,345
 4,345
 
 
 
Total $7,228,260
 $780,870
 $1,197,229
 $2,449,587
 $2,800,574
____________________________________
(1)Interest payments due in future periods on the $164.4 million of variable rate debt were calculated using a forward LIBOR curve.
(2)As of December 31, 2019, we had $900.0 million of variable rate debt on the Credit Facility Term Loan effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the interest rates effectively fixed under our swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(3)Includes the Company’s share of capital expenditures related to an expansion project of the property held within an unconsolidated joint venture and letters of credit outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, all letters of credit outstanding were terminated.
Cash Flow Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in operating activities increased $601.5 million to $107.6 million from $493.9 million net cash provided by operating activities during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $524.5 million increase in litigation and non-routine costs, net, including litigation settlements, paid during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $462.1 million to $613.2 million from $151.1 million during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily related to an increase in cash proceeds from dispositions of real estate and joint ventures of $565.2 million and a decrease in investments in real estate assets of $106.0 million, offset by a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations of $122.9 million, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of CMBS and mortgage notes receivables of $37.1 million and an increase in payments for capital expenditures and leasing costs and real estate developments of $34.6 million.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities of $525.4 million decreased $130.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from $655.4 million during the same period in 2018. The decrease was primarily related to $1.0 billion of proceeds received from the issuance of Common Stock in 2019, offset by the redemption of $300.1 million of Series F Preferred Stock in 2019, an increase in payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs of $236.2 million, and a decrease of $170.0 million in net proceeds related to the credit facilities, corporate bonds and convertible notes. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2019, $192.0 million of payments were made related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units, with no comparable activity during the same period in 2018.
Please refer to the discussion in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 21, 2019, for the cash flow analysis for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.


Election as a REIT
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. As a REIT, except as discussed below, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the General Partner maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019.
The Operating Partnership is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the Operating Partnership is required to take into account its allocable share of the Operating Partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. However, the Operating Partnership may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property. Under the LPA, the Operating Partnership is required to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The Company conducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS. A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducts all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and, as a result, it files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. Certain of the Company’s inter-company transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. However, net leases that require the tenant to pay its allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, may reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related Party Transactions and Agreements
Through the closing of the Cole Capital sale, we were contractually responsible for managing the Cole REITs’ affairs on a day-to-day basis. For further explanation of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees see Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable-rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options and forwards in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included fixed-rate debt, including debt that has interest rates that are fixed with the use of derivative instruments, with a fair value and carrying value of $5.8 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively. Changes in market interest rates on our fixed rate debt impact the fair value of the debt, but they have no impact on interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates rise 100 basis points, and the fixed rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our debt to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of $217.6 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt of $236.0 million.
As of December 31, 2019, our debt included variable-rate debt with a fair value and carrying value of $164.5 million and $164.4 million, respectively. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable-rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 2019 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates on our variable-rate debt would increase or decrease our interest expense by $1.6 million annually. See Note 6 –Debt to our consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2019, our interest rate swaps had a fair value that resulted in net liabilities of $27.8 million. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2019, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
In July 2017, the FCA announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Company is not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. The Company has contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest amounts on our variable rate debt as discussed in Note 6 –Debt and the swap rate for our interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion on risks related to changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined, or the use of alternative reference rates.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company is subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, geographies or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this document.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
I. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the General Partner
For purposes of the discussion in this Part I of Item 9A, the “Company” refers to the General Partner.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
II. Discussion of Controls and Procedures of the Operating Partnership
In the information incorporated by reference into this Part II of Item 9A, the term “Company” refers to the Operating Partnership, except as the context otherwise requires.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019 and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of that date.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020



Item 9B. Other Information.
None

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item will be included in our Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Objectiveand Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
The Financial Statements are included herein at pages F-1 through F-59.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included herein on page F-60.
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included herein on pages F-61 through F-178.
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans Held for Investment is included herein on page F-179.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Using DerivativesRegulation S-K):
Exhibit No.Description
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
4.1
4.2
4.3

Exhibit No.Description
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20*
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4†
10.5†
10.6†
10.7†
10.8†
10.9†

Exhibit No.Description
10.10†
10.11†
10.12†
10.13†
10.14†
10.15†
10.16†
10.17†
10.18†
10.19†
10.20†
10.21†
10.22†
10.23†
10.24†
10.25†
10.26†
10.27†
10.28†
10.29†
10.30

Exhibit No.Description
10.31
21.1*
23.1*
23.2*
31.1*
31.2*
31.3*
31.4*
32.1**
32.2**
32.3**
32.4**
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101.*).
_____________________________
*Filed herewith
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Not Applicable


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VEREIT, INC.
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By: VEREIT, Inc., its sole general partner
By:/s/ Michael J. Bartolotta
Michael J. Bartolotta
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 25, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameCapacity *Date
/s/ Glenn J. RufranoChief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Glenn J. Rufrano(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
/s/ Michael J. BartolottaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Michael J. Bartolotta(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Gavin B. BrandonSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 25, 2020
Gavin B. Brandon(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Hugh R. FraterDirector, Non-Executive ChairmanFebruary 25, 2020
Hugh R. Frater
/s/ David B. HenryDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
David B. Henry
/s/ Mary Hogan PreusseDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mary Hogan Preusse
/s/ Richard J. LiebDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Richard J. Lieb
/s/ Mark S. OrdanDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Mark S. Ordan
/s/ Eugene A. PinoverDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Eugene A. Pinover
/s/ Julie G. RichardsonDirectorFebruary 25, 2020
Julie G. Richardson

*Each person is signing in his or her capacity as an officer and/or director of VEREIT, Inc., which is the sole general partner of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of VEREIT, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Real Estate Investments - Impairments- Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered from the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. Estimating future undiscounted cash flows requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimating the expected holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability.
In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the carrying value of real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. During 2019, the Company recorded $47.1 million of impairment charges.

We identified the impairment of real estate assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions required to evaluate the recoverability of real estate assets, including the estimated holding period of the assets when assessing recoverability. Auditing the assumptions used by the Company in estimating future undiscounted cash flows required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the Company’s recoverability analysis.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures to test the assumptions used by management to estimate forecasted cash flows, including management’s expected holding period of such real estate assets, consisted of the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over the inputs of the forecasted cash flows used in the recoverability analysis.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the undiscounted future cash flows analysis, including estimates of future occupancy levels, market rental revenue, and capitalization rates, in addition to the assessment of expected remaining holding period and changes in management’s intent with respect to the expected holding period for each real estate asset with possible impairment indicators by:
1.Making inquiries of accounting and operations management.
2.Comparing the source data and management’s assumptions to the Company’s historical results and external market sources.
3.Testing the mathematical accuracy of the undiscounted future cash flows analysis.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the partners of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P and subsidiaries (the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 25, 2020
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.


F-4

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)


  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870
 15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623
 12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 

 


Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 309
 428
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,500,000,000 shares authorized and 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 10,768
 9,675
Additional paid-in capital 13,251,962
 12,615,472
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (27,670) (1,280)
Accumulated deficit (6,399,626) (5,467,236)
Total stockholders’ equity 6,835,743
 7,157,059
Non-controlling interests 7,535
 143,085
Total equity 6,843,278
 7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per share data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254

996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net
11,752

(164,237)
(197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes
(302,844)
(86,624)
58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106)
(91,725)
51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106) (88,030) 32,378
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 6,753
 2,256
 (560)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(300,353)
$(85,774)
$31,818
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-6

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income (27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income (334,543) (85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests(1)
 7,800
 2,200
 (534)
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the General Partner $(326,743) $(83,485) $30,805

(1)Represents comprehensive loss (income) attributable to limited partners and a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-7

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for share data)

  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,146,650
 $9,741
 $12,640,171
 $(2,556) $(4,200,423) $8,447,361
 $172,172
 $8,619,533
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (68,759) (1) (517) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (268,550) (2) (2,146) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 399,242
 4
 16,750
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) (535,657) 
 (535,657)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,227) (13,227)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 (571) (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 31,818
 560
 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (1,013) (26) (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138
 $428
 974,208,583
 $9,742
 $12,654,258
 $(3,569) $(4,776,581) $7,884,278
 $158,598
 $8,042,876
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 32,439
 
 241
 
 
 241
 (241) 
Repurchases of Common Stock under share repurchase programs 
 
 (7,206,876) (72) (50,082) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (324,502) (2) (2,324) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 805,521
 7
 13,307
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) (532,144) 
 (532,144)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (13,048) (13,048)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 72
 
 (989) (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (71,748) (71,748) (144) (71,892)
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) (85,774) (2,256) (88,030)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 2,289
 56
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138
 $428
 967,515,165
 $9,675
 $12,615,472
 $(1,280) $(5,467,236) $7,157,059
 $143,085
 $7,300,144
Issuance of Common Stock, net 
 
 108,410,070
 1,084
 1,013,131
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock 
 
 130,291
 1
 1,166
 
 
 1,167
 (1,167) 


F-8

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for share data)


  Preferred Stock Common Stock            

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated
Deficit
 Total Stock-holders’ Equity Non-Controlling Interests Total Equity
Conversion of Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 $1
 
 $
 $922
 $
 $
 $923
 $(923) $
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (120) 
 
 (300,002) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligation 
 
 (200,331) (2) (1,616) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 990,789
 10
 13,091
 
 
 13,101
 
 13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions declared on Common Stock —
$0.55 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) (562,195) 
 (562,195)
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (9,494) (9,494)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 117
 
 (1,445) (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to preferred shareholders and unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 (68,397) (68,397) (91) (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 (91,920) 
 
 (91,920) (126,590) (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of equity 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 
 2,071
 (2,071) 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) (300,353) (6,753) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (26,390) (1,047) (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246

$309

1,076,845,984

$10,768

$13,251,962

$(27,670)
$(6,399,626)
$6,835,743

$7,535

$6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-9

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:    
  
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity-based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities and gain on joint venture (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603) 493,914

793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119

(274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-10

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398) (655,406)
(756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663

$61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-11

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments, at cost:    
Land $2,738,679
 $2,843,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 10,200,550
 10,749,228
Intangible lease assets 1,904,641
 2,012,399
Total real estate investments, at cost 14,843,870

15,604,839
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,594,247
 3,436,772
Total real estate investments, net 11,249,623

12,168,067
Operating lease right-of-use assets 215,227
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities 68,825
 35,289
Cash and cash equivalents 12,921
 30,758
Restricted cash 20,959
 22,905
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net 348,395
 366,092
Goodwill 1,337,773
 1,337,773
Real estate assets held for sale, net 26,957
 2,609
Total assets $13,280,680

$13,963,493
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Mortgage notes payable, net $1,528,134
 $1,922,657
Corporate bonds, net 2,813,739
 3,368,609
Convertible debt, net 318,183
 394,883
Credit facility, net 1,045,669
 401,773
Below-market lease liabilities, net 143,583
 173,479
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 126,320
 145,611
Deferred rent and other liabilities 90,349
 69,714
Distributions payable 150,364
 186,623
Operating lease liabilities 221,061
 
Total liabilities 6,437,402

6,663,349
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) 


 


General Partner's preferred equity, 30,871,246 and 42,834,138 General Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 460,504
 710,325
General Partner's common equity, 1,076,845,984 and 967,515,165 General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 6,375,239
 6,446,734
Limited Partner's preferred equity, 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 1,869
 2,883
Limited Partner's common equity, 786,719 and 23,715,908 Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively 4,433
 138,931
Total partners’ equity 6,842,045

7,298,873
Non-controlling interests 1,233
 1,271
Total equity 6,843,278

7,300,144
Total liabilities and equity $13,280,680

$13,963,493

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-12

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except for per unit data)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Rental revenue $1,237,234
 $1,257,867
 $1,252,285
Operating expenses:      
Acquisition-related 4,337
 3,632
 3,402
Litigation and non-routine costs, net 815,422
 290,963
 47,960
Property operating 129,769
 126,461
 128,717
General and administrative 62,711
 63,933
 58,603
Depreciation and amortization 481,995
 640,618
 706,802
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Restructuring 10,505
 
 
Total operating expenses 1,551,830

1,180,254
 996,032
Other (expenses) income:      
Interest expense (278,574) (280,887) (289,766)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net (17,910) 5,360
 18,373
Other income, net 12,971
 15,090
 9,218
Equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities 2,618
 1,869
 2,763
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net 292,647
 94,331
 61,536
Total other income (expenses), net 11,752

(164,237) (197,876)
(Loss) income before taxes (302,844)
(86,624) 58,377
Provision for income taxes (4,262) (5,101) (6,882)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (307,106) (91,725) 51,495
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net (loss) income (307,106)
(88,030) 32,378
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP $(307,004)
$(87,876) $32,572
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Represents net loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.
(2)Amounts may not total due to rounding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-13

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Total other comprehensive (loss) income      
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives (29,894) 
 (18)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate derivatives into net (loss) income 2,457
 313
 (70)
Unrealized loss on investment securities, net 
 (205) (951)
Reclassification of previous unrealized loss on investment securities into net (loss) income as other income, net 
 2,237
 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(27,437)
2,345
 (1,039)
       
Total comprehensive (loss) income
(334,543)
(85,685) 31,339
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1)
 102
 154
 194
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the OP
$(334,441)
$(85,531) $31,533

(1)Represents comprehensive loss attributable to a consolidated joint venture partner.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


F-14

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Balance, January 1, 2017 42,834,138
 $853,821
 86,874
 $3,171
 974,146,650
 $7,593,540
 23,748,347
 $166,598

$8,617,130
 $2,403

$8,619,533
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (68,759) (518) 
 
 (518) 
 (518)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (268,550) (2,148) 
 
 (2,148) 
 (2,148)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 399,242
 16,754
 
 
 16,754
 
 16,754
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (535,657) 
 (13,060) (548,717) (167) (548,884)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (571) 
 
 (571) 
 (571)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Disposition of joint venture interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (838) (838)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 31,818
 
 754
 32,572
 (194) 32,378
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (1,013) 
 (26) (1,039) 
 (1,039)
Balance, December 31, 2017 42,834,138

$782,073

86,874

$3,027

974,208,583

$7,102,205

23,748,347

$154,266

$8,041,571

$1,305

$8,042,876
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 32,439
 241
 (32,439) (241) 
 
 
Repurchases of common OP Units under share repurchase programs 
 
 
 
 (7,206,876) (50,154) 
 
 (50,154) 
 (50,154)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (324,502) (2,326) 
 
 (2,326) 
 (2,326)
Equity-based compensation, net 
 
 
 
 805,521
 13,314
 
 
 13,314
 
 13,314
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120
 120
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (532,144) 
 (13,048) (545,192) 
 (545,192)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (917) 
 
 (917) 
 (917)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (71,748) 
 (144) 
 
 
 
 (71,892) 
 (71,892)
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 (85,774) 
 (2,102) (87,876) (154) (88,030)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 2,289
 
 56
 2,345
 
 2,345
Balance, December 31, 2018 42,834,138

$710,325

86,874

$2,883

967,515,165

$6,446,734

23,715,908

$138,931

$7,298,873

$1,271

$7,300,144
Issuance of common OP Units, net 
 
 
 
 108,410,070
 1,014,215
 
 
 1,014,215
 
 1,014,215
Conversion of Limited Partners' common OP Units to General Partner's common OP Units 
 
 
 
 130,291
 1,167
 (130,291) (1,167) 
 
 
Conversion of Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units to Series F Preferred Stock 37,108
 923
 (37,108) (923) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redemptions of Series F Preferred Stock (12,000,000) (182,347) 
 
 
 (117,775) 
 
 (300,122) 
 (300,122)
Repurchases of common OP Units to settle tax obligation 
 
 
 
 (200,331) (1,618) 
 
 (1,618) 
 (1,618)


F-15

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(In thousands, except for unit data)

  Preferred Units Common Units      
  General Partner Limited Partner General Partner Limited Partner      

 Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Number of Units Capital Total Partners' Capital Non-Controlling Interests Total Capital
Equity-based compensation, net 
 $
 
 $
 990,789
 $13,101
 
 $
 $13,101
 $
 $13,101
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 64
 64
Distributions to common OP Units and non-controlling interests —$0.55 per common unit 
 
 
 
 
 (562,195) 
 (9,494) (571,689) 
 (571,689)
Dividend equivalents on awards granted under the Equity Plan 
 
 
 
 
 (1,328) 
 
 (1,328) 
 (1,328)
Distributions to Series F Preferred Units 
 (68,397) 
 (91) 
 
 
 
 (68,488) 
 (68,488)
Distributions payable relinquished 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,522
 12,522
 
 12,522
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units 
 
 
 
 
 (91,920) (22,798,898) (126,590) (218,510) 
 (218,510)
Repurchase of convertible notes 
 
 
 
 
 (470) 
 
 (470) 
 (470)
Reallocation of capital 
 
 
 
 
 2,071
 
 (2,071) 
 
 
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (300,353) 
 (6,651) (307,004) (102) (307,106)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (26,390) 
 (1,047) (27,437) 
 (27,437)
Balance, December 31, 2019 30,871,246
 $460,504
 49,766
 $1,869
 1,076,845,984
 $6,375,239
 786,719
 $4,433
 $6,842,045
 $1,233
 $6,843,278


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-16

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(307,106) $(88,030) $32,378
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 495,232
 659,948
 745,499
Gain on real estate assets, net (296,447) (96,068) (61,536)
Impairments from held for sale 
 
 20,027
Impairments 47,091
 54,647
 50,548
Equity based compensation 13,101
 13,314
 16,751
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities (2,618) (1,869) (2,726)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities 284
 1,366
 3,646
Loss (gain) on investments 492
 (4,092) (65)
Loss (gain) on derivative instruments 58
 (355) (2,976)
Non-cash restructuring expense 3,951
 
 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment and forgiveness of debt, net 17,910
 (5,360) (18,373)
Surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (26,536) 
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Investment in direct financing leases 1,622
 2,078
 2,097
 Rent and tenant receivables, operating lease right-of-use and other assets, net (18,367) (34,096) (21,394)
Due from affiliates 
 
 1,163
Assets held for sale classified as discontinued operations 
 (2,492) 13,812
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (16,719) 1,688
 10,742
Deferred rent, operating lease and other liabilities (19,551) 7,162
 (395)
Due to affiliates 
 (66) 50
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 
 (13,861) 4,019
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (107,603)
493,914
 793,267
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Investments in real estate assets (394,662) (500,625) (699,004)
Capital expenditures and leasing costs (37,957) (22,291) (21,694)
Real estate developments (28,125) (9,221) (14,850)
 Principal repayments received on investment securities and mortgage notes receivable 106
 5,761
 6,796
Investments in unconsolidated entities (2,767) (771) 
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities 1,138
 48
 1,972
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture 1,067,532
 502,289
 445,525
Proceeds from disposition of discontinued operations 
 122,915
 
Investment in leasehold improvements and other assets (1,716) (841) (1,191)
Deposits for real estate assets (8,453) (13,412) (37,226)
Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets 9,837
 46,966
 400
Uses and refunds of deposits for real estate assets 6,328
 17,267
 36,111
Proceeds from the settlement of property-related insurance claims 1,957
 1,434
 355
Line of credit advances to Cole REITs 
 (2,200) (16,400)
Line of credit repayments from Cole REITs 
 3,800
 25,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 613,218
 151,119
 (274,106)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable 705
 187
 4,652
 Payments on mortgage notes payable and other debt, including debt extinguishment costs (374,058) (137,887) (424,385)
Proceeds from credit facility 1,386,000
 1,934,000
 329,000
Payments on credit facility (739,000) (1,716,000) (645,107)
Proceeds from corporate bonds 593,052
 546,304
 600,000
Redemptions of corporate bonds, including extinguishment costs (1,160,977) 
 
Repurchases of convertible notes, including extinguishment costs (82,254) (597,500) 
Payments of deferred financing costs (4,190) (25,471) (9,575)

F-17

Table of Contents
VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Repurchases of Common Stock under the share repurchase programs $
 $(50,154) $(518)
Repurchases of Common Stock to settle tax obligations (1,618) (2,326) (2,148)
 Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, net of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses 1,014,215
 
 
Redemption of Series F Preferred Stock (300,122) 
 
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders 64
 120
 101
Distributions paid (665,241) (606,679) (608,615)
Payment related to the surrender of Limited Partner OP Units (191,974) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities (525,398)
(655,406) (756,595)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (19,783) (10,373) (237,434)
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $53,663
 $64,036
 $301,470
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 (2,198) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 33,880
 53,663
 64,036
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations 
 
 (2,198)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from continuing operations, end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838
Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $30,758
 $34,176
 $253,479
Restricted cash at beginning of period 22,905
 27,662
 45,018
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period 53,663
 61,838
 298,497
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 12,921
 30,758
 34,176
Restricted cash at end of period 20,959
 22,905
 27,662
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period $33,880
 $53,663
 $61,838

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-18

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019


Note 1 – Organization
VEREIT is a Maryland corporation, incorporated on December 2, 2010, that qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. The OP is a Delaware limited partnership of which the General Partner is the sole general partner. VEREIT’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and its 6.70% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbols, “VER” and “VER PRF,” respectively. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to VEREIT, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP.
VEREIT is a full-service real estate operating company which owns and manages one of the largest portfolios of single-tenant commercial properties in the U.S. VEREIT’s business model provides equity capital to creditworthy corporations in return for long-term leases on their properties. The Company actively manages its portfolio considering a number of metrics including property type, concentration and key economic factors for appropriate balance and diversity.
Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through the OP. VEREIT is the sole general partner and holder of 99.9% of the common equity interests in the OP as of December 31, 2019. Under the limited partnership agreement of the OP, as amended (the “LPA”), after holding common units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP Units”) or Series F Preferred Units of limited partnership interests in the OP (“Series F Preferred Units”), for a period of one year and meeting the other requirements in the LPA, unless we otherwise consent to an earlier redemption, holders have the right to redeem the units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, or, at our option, a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock or Series F Preferred Stock, as applicable, subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the LPA. The remaining rights of the holders of OP Units are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the General Partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP’s assets.
The actions of the OP and its relationship with the General Partner are governed by the LPA. The General Partner does not have any significant assets other than its investment in the OP. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the General Partner and the OP are the same. Additionally, pursuant to the LPA, all administrative expenses and expenses associated with the formation, continuity, existence and operation of the General Partner incurred by the General Partner on the OP’s behalf shall be treated as expenses of the OP. Further, when the General Partner issues any equity instrument that has been approved by the General Partner’s Board of Directors, the LPA requires the OP to issue to the General Partner equity instruments with substantially similar terms, to protect the integrity of the Company’s umbrella partnership REIT structure, pursuant to which each holder of interests in the OP has a proportionate economic interest in the OP reflecting its capital contributions thereto. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to the General Partner are referred to as “General Partner OP Units” and “General Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. OP Units and Series F Preferred Units issued to parties other than the General Partner are referred to as “Limited Partner OP Units” and “Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units,” respectively. The LPA also provides that the OP issue debt with terms and provisions consistent with debt issued by the General Partner. The LPA will be amended to provide for the issuance of any additional class of equivalent equity instruments to the extent the General Partner’s Board of Directors authorizes the issuance of any new class of equity securities.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting
The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

F-19

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and a consolidated joint venture. The portion of the consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company is presented as non-controlling interest in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. In addition, as described in Note 1 – Organization and Note 12 – Equity, certain third parties have been issued OP Units and Series F Preferred Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Equity is reallocated between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP upon a change in ownership. At the end of each reporting period, noncontrolling interests in the OP are adjusted to reflect their ownership percentage in the OP through a reallocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP, as applicable. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were approximately 0.8 million and 23.7 million Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding, respectively, and 49,766 and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding, respectively.
For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity.
The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.
Reclassification
The (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net line item has been combined into other income, net for prior periods presented to be consistent with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments, real estate investment impairment, allocation of purchase price of real estate asset acquisitions and income taxes.
Real Estate Investments
The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for intangible lease assets.

F-20

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their relative fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, fixtures and improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above-market and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases. In estimating fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the initial term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease, then the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to expense.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, including any bargain renewal periods. Above-market leases are amortized as a reduction to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may result in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and external acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions were capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as described above. Internal costs, such as employee salaries, related to activities necessary to complete, or affect, self-originating asset acquisitions or business combinations are classified as acquisition-related expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Assets Held for Sale
Upon classifying a real estate investment as held for sale, the Company will no longer recognize depreciation expense related to the depreciable assets of the property. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less the estimated cost to dispose of the assets. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion regarding properties held for sale.
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the Company will reclassify the property as held and used. The Company measures and records a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (i) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used or (ii) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Development Activities
Project costs, which include interest expense, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives.

F-21

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Discontinued Operations
The Company reports discontinued operations when a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 14 —Discontinued Operations for further discussion regarding discontinued operations.
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investment in unconsolidated joint venture arrangements using the equity method of accounting as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financing policies of these investments. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the joint ventures’ earnings and distributions. The Company records its proportionate share of net income (loss) from the unconsolidated joint ventures in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangiblesfor further discussion on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Investment in Cole REITs
On February 1, 2018, the Company sold certain of its equity investments to CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”), an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC, retaining interests retaining interests in Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”). Subsequent to the sale of Cole Capital, the Company carries these investments at fair value, as the Company does not exert significant influence over CCIT II, CCIT III or CCPT V, and any changes in the fair value are recognized in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.Prior to the sale of Cole Capital, the Company accounted for these investments using the equity method of accounting, which required the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equity in the respective Cole REIT’s earnings and distributions. The Company recorded its proportionate share of net income or loss from the Cole REITs in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
The Company leases its corporate office facilities under operating leases. Leasehold improvements related to these are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life or remaining lease term.
Property and equipment, which typically include computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, among other items, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. The Company reassesses the useful lives of its property and equipment and adjusts the future monthly depreciation expense based on the new useful life, as applicable. If the Company disposes of an asset, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are written off upon disposal.
Goodwill
In the case of a business combination, after identifying all tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, the excess consideration paid over the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and assumed, respectively, represents goodwill. In connection with prior mergers, the Company recorded goodwill as a result of the merger consideration exceeding the net assets acquired. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of goodwill was $1.3 billion.

F-22

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Impairments
Real Estate Assets
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators that the Company considers include, but are not limited to, decrease in net operating income, bankruptcy or other credit concerns of a property’s major tenant or tenants, such as history of late payments, rental concessions and other factors, as well as significant decreases in a property’s revenues due to lease terminations, vacancies, co-tenancy clauses or reduced lease rates. When impairment indicators are identified or if a property is considered to have a more likely than not probability of being disposed of within the next 12 to 24 months, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. U.S. GAAP requires us to utilize the Company’s expected holding period of our properties when assessing recoverability. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the Company will adjust the real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales or leasing transactions. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of real estate assets are discussed in Note 5 – Fair Value Measures.
Goodwill
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. To determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test, the Company first assesses qualitative factors, including, but not limited to macro-economic conditions such as deterioration in the entity's operating environment or industry or market considerations; entity-specific events such as increasing costs, declining financial performance, or loss of key personnel; or other events such as an expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or a sustained decrease in the stock price on either an absolute basis or relative to peers. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50% chance) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no quantitative testing is required. If it is determined, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, the provisions of guidance require that the Company then compares the fair value to the carrying value. Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying value exceeds the fair value.
The Company performed the annual qualitative assessment for goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2019. As a result of the qualitative testing, the Company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the goodwill is greater than the carrying value. As such, no further testing was performed. The Company performed a quantitative analysis for the annual goodwill tests during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, which also resulted in 0 impairments.
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company is required to determine whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of any of its investment in the unconsolidated joint ventures. If an event or change in circumstance has occurred, the Company is required to evaluate its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture for potential impairment and determine if the carrying value of its investment exceeds its fair value. An impairment charge is recorded when an impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. The evaluation of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. NaN impairments of unconsolidated joint ventures were identified during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Leasehold Improvements and Property and Equipment
Leasehold improvements and property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If this review indicates that the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, the Company records an impairment loss, measured at fair value by estimated discounted cash flows or market appraisals. The evaluation of leasehold improvements and property and equipment for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain assumptions. The use of different judgments and assumptions could result in different conclusions. NaN impairments of leasehold improvements and property and equipment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

F-23

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts, as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. The Company deposits cash with several high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit of $250,000. At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured levels. Although the Company bears risk on amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it has not experienced and does not anticipate any losses due to the high quality of the institutions where the deposits are held.
Restricted Cash
The Company had $21.0 million and $22.9 million, respectively, in restricted cash as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Restricted cash primarily consists of reserves related to lease expirations, as well as maintenance, structural and debt service reserves. In accordance with certain debt agreements, rent from certain of the Company’s tenants is deposited directly into a lockbox account, from which the monthly debt service payments are disbursed to the lender and the excess funds are then disbursed to the Company. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2019 was $18.8 million in lender reserves and $2.2 million held in restricted lockbox accounts. Included in restricted cash at December 31, 2018 was $21.5 million in lender reserves and $1.4 million held in restricted lockbox accounts.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing. Deferred financing costs, other than those associated with the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6 –Debt), are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Deferred financing costs related to the Revolving Credit Facility are included in rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in connection with potential financial transactions that are not completed are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not be completed.
Convertible Debt
The Company has an outstanding aggregate balance of $321.8 million related to the 2020 Convertible Notes (as defined in Note 6 –Debt ). The 2020 Convertible Notes are convertible into cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the Company’s option. In accordance with U.S GAAP, the 2020 Convertible Notes are accounted for as a liability with a separate equity component recorded for the conversion option. A liability was recorded for the 2020 Convertible Notes on the issuance date at fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current market rates for debt instruments with similar terms. The difference between the initial proceeds from the 2020 Convertible Notes and the estimated fair value of the debt instruments resulted in a debt discount, with an offset recorded to additional paid-in capital representing the equity component. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense over the respective term of the 2020 Convertible Notes.
Derivative Instruments
The Company may use derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, collars, treasury locks, options floors and other interest rate derivative contracts,forwards to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings. The principalCompany’s interest rate management objectives are intended to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to manage the Company’s overall borrowing costs. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of such arrangements isits cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges are used to minimizehedge forecasted issuances of fixed rate debt and the risks and/or costsvariable cash flows associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.floating rate debt. The Company does not intend to utilize derivatives for purposes other than interest rate risk management. The use of derivative financial instruments carries certain risks, including the risk that the counterparties to these contractual arrangements are not able to perform under the agreements. To mitigate this risk, the Company only enters into derivative financial instruments with counterparties with high credit ratings and with major financial institutions with which the Company and its affiliates may also have other financial relationships. The Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.

F-24

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether each has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. If the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting treatment, any changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized immediately in other income, net in the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). If the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, the change in fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized gains and losses in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to interest expense when the related hedged items impact earnings. See Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities for further discussion.
Leases
ASC 842 (effective January 1, 2019)
The adoption of ASC 842, effective January 1, 2019, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The most significant impact was the recognition of operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases pursuant to which the Company is the lessee. The Company did not have a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The lessor accounting model under ASC 842 is similar to existing guidance, however, it limits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, such as internally generated costs, and modifies the lease classification criteria through the elimination of "bright-line" tests.
The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under ASC 842 (which included: (i) an entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) an entity need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (iii) an entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases), the land easement practical expedient to carry forward existing accounting treatment on existing land easements, the practical expedient which allows a lessee to combine lease and non-lease components, and the short-term lease election that allows a lessee not to apply the balance sheet recognition requirements to leases with a term of 12 months or less. The Company elected not to apply the practical expedients related to hindsight or assessing impairment of ROU assets.
Lessor (effective January 1, 2019)
At the inception of a new lease arrangement, including new leases that arise from amendments, the Company assesses the terms and conditions to determine the proper lease classification. When the terms of a lease effectively transfer control of the underlying asset, the lease is classified as a sales-type lease. When a lease does not effectively transfer control of the underlying asset to the lessee, but the Company obtains a guarantee for the value of the asset from a third party, the Company classifies the lease as a direct financing lease. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company has acquired certain properties that are subject to leases that qualified as direct financing leases. Investments in direct financing leases represent the fair value of the remaining lease payments on the leases and the estimated fair value of any expected residual property value at the end of the lease term. The fair value of the remaining lease payments is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates that would represent the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt. The expected residual property value at the end of the lease term is estimated using market data and assessments of the remaining useful lives of the properties at the end of the lease terms, among other factors. Income from direct financing leases is calculated using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the lease. The Company does not have any sales-type leases as of December 31, 2019.
For operating leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis, including the effect of any free rent periods, over the lease term when collectability of lease payments is probable. Variable lease payments are recognized as rental revenue in the period when the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. Variable lease payments, including contingent rent, which is paid by a tenant when the tenant's sales exceed an agreed upon minimum amount, are recognized once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds and is calculated by multiplying the sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease.

F-25

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The Company, as lessor, identified three separate lease components as follows: i) land lease component, ii) single property lease component comprised of building, land improvements and tenant improvements, and iii) furniture and fixtures. The Company’s leases also contain provisions for tenants to reimburse the Company for real estate taxes and insurance, which are considered noncomponents of the lease, and maintenance and other property operating expenses, which are considered to be non-lease components. The Company elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components and the non-lease components will be included with the single property lease component as the predominant component.
The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent, straight-line rent and property operating expense reimbursements and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. The review includes a binary assessment of whether or not substantially all of the amounts due under a tenant’s lease agreement are probable of collection. For leases that are deemed probable of collection, revenue continues to be recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For leases that are deemed not probable of collection, revenue is recorded as cash is received. The Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental income and does not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts.
Rental revenue also includes lease termination income collected from tenants to allow for the tenant to vacate their space prior to their scheduled termination dates, as well as amortization of above and below-market leases.
Lessee (effective January 1, 2019)
To account for leases for which the Company is the lessee, contracts must be analyzed upon inception to determine if the arrangement is, or contains, a lease. A lease conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Lease classification tests and measurement procedures are performed at the lease commencement date.
The lease liability is initially measured as the present value of the lease payments over the lease term, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate is readily determinable; otherwise, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used. The incremental borrowing rate is determined based on the estimated rate of interest that the lessee would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. The lease term is the noncancelable period of the lease and includes any renewal and termination options the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. The lease liability balance is amortized using the effective interest method. The lease liability is remeasured when the contract is modified, upon the resolution of a contingency such that variable payments become fixed or if the assessment of exercising an extension, termination or purchase option changes.
The ROU asset balance is initially measured as the lease liability amount, adjusted for any lease payments made prior to the commencement date, initial direct costs, estimated costs to dismantle, remove, or restore the underlying asset and incentives received.
The Company’s impairment assessment for ROU assets is consistent with the impairment analysis for the Company's other long-lived assets and is reviewed quarterly.
Policy applicable to periods prior to January 1, 2019
The accounting policy for leases in which the Company is the lessor or lessee prior to the adoption of ASC 842 can be found in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenues generated through leasing arrangements are within the scope of ASC 842, as discussed above, and are excluded from Topic 606.
Revenue Recognition - Cole Capital
As discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations, on February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital. The assets, liabilities and related financial results of substantially all of the Cole Capital segment are reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations.

F-26

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Cole Capital earned securities sales commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution and stockholder servicing fees, real estate acquisition fees, financing coordination fees, property management fees, advisory fees, asset management fees and performance fees for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment and management of their respective assets, in accordance with the respective dealer manager and advisory agreements. The Company was also reimbursed for certain costs incurred in providing these services, which were recorded as revenue as the expenses were incurred subject to revenue constraint due to the limitations on the amount that was reimbursable based on the terms of the respective dealer manager and advisory agreements. Refer to Note 15 –Related Party Transactions and Arrangementsfor a disaggregation of Cole Capital revenues.
The Company entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with the Cole Purchaser, pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole Purchaser and the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support, (“Transition Services Revenues”) through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year). Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Company will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certain of the services provided. The Company recorded Transition Services Revenues as costs associated with providing such services were incurred, which coincided with the timing in which the performance obligations of the contract had been met. During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company incurred $2.1 million of such costs and recognized revenues of $2.4 million, including acquisition fees, and during the period from February 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, the Company incurred $15.0 million of such costs and recognized revenues of $15.0 million, which are recorded in other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company may also earn additional fees in each calendar year through December 31, 2023 if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold in a calendar year (the “Net Revenue Payments”), up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
Litigation and non-routine costs, net
The Company has incurred legal fees and other costs associated with litigations and investigations resulting from the Audit Committee Investigation (defined below), which are considered non-routine. The Company’s insurance carriers have paid certain defense costs subject to standard reservation of rights under the respective policies.
Litigation and non-routine costs, net include the following costs and recoveries (amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Litigation and non-routine costs, net:      
Audit Committee Investigation and related matters (1)
 $70,168
 $59,755
 $49,434
Legal fees and expenses (2)
 2
 530
 421
Litigation settlements (3)
 820,208
 233,246
 
Merger related transfer taxes(4)
 
 
 (1,595)
Total costs 890,378

293,531

48,260
Insurance recoveries (5)
 (48,420) (2,568) (300)
Other recoveries (6)
 (26,536) 
 
Total $815,422
 $290,963
 $47,960
___________________________________
(1)Includes all fees and costs associated with various litigations and investigations prompted by the results of the 2014 investigation conducted by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”), including fees and costs incurred pursuant to the Company’s advancement obligations, litigation related thereto and in connection with related insurance recovery matters, net of accrual reversals.
(2)Includes legal fees and expenses associated with litigation resulting from prior mergers and excludes amounts presented in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
(3)Refer to Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.
(4)The negative balance for the year ended December 31, 2017 is a result of estimated costs accrued in prior periods that exceeded actual expenses incurred.
(5)$2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 relates to litigation resulting from prior mergers.
(6)Represents the surrender of 2.9 million Limited Partner OP Units. Refer to Note 12 – Equity for additional information.

F-27

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Loss Contingencies
The Company records a liability in the consolidated financial statements for loss contingencies when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of a known or probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount of the range is accrued. If a material loss is reasonably possible but not known or probable, and is reasonably estimable, the estimated loss or range of loss is disclosed. 
Equity-based Compensation
The Company has an equity-based incentive award plan (the “Equity Plan”) for non-executive directors, officers, other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under U.S. GAAP for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met. See Note 13– Equity-based Compensation for additional information on these plans.
Restructuring
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s obligation to provide certain initial transition services for the Cole Purchaser terminated in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement and the Company recorded $10.5 million of restructuring expenses related to the reorganization of its business, of which $9.2 million related to office lease terminations and modifications and $1.8 million related to the cessation of services under the Services Agreement, including severance, net of ASC 842 operating lease adjustments of $0.5 million. NaN restructuring expenses were recorded prior to January 1, 2019 in connection with the sale.
Per Share Data
Income (loss) per basic share of Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) less dividends on unvested restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”) and dividends on preferred stock by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted income (loss) per share of Common Stock considers the effect of potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period.
Income Taxes
The General Partner elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. We believe we are organized and operating in such a manner as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2019. As a REIT, the General Partner is generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders so long as it distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains). However, the General Partner, its taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) entities, and the OP are still subject to certain state and local income, franchise and property taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. The General Partner may also be subject to federal income taxes on certain income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
The OP is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the OP is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, each partner in the OP is required to include its allocable share of the OP’s income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for each taxable year. Under the LPA, the OP is to conduct business in such a manner as to permit the General Partner at all times to qualify as a REIT.
A TRS is a subsidiary of a REIT that is subject to federal, state and local income taxes, as applicable. The Company’s use of a TRS enables it to engage in certain business activities while complying with the REIT qualification requirements and to retain any income generated by these businesses for reinvestment without the requirement to distribute those earnings. The Company conducted substantially all of the Cole Capital business activities through a TRS until it sold the Cole Capital business on February 1, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company conducted all of its business in the United States and Puerto Rico and filed income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to routine examinations by taxing authorities for years before 2015. Certain of the Company’s intercompany transactions that have been eliminated in consolidation for financial accounting purposes are also subject to taxation.
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with current authoritative accounting and tax guidance. The tax provision or benefit related to significant or unusual items is recognized in the quarter in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the quarter in which the change occurs. The accounting

F-28

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

estimates used to compute the provision for or benefit from income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained or the tax environment changes.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized state and local income and franchise tax expense of $4.3 million, $4.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively, which are included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company recorded a provision for federal income taxes of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to a TRS entity, which is also included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. NaN provision for federal income taxes related to a TRS entity was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2017. The provision for or benefit from income taxes attributable to the Cole Capital business, substantially all of which was conducted through a TRS entity, is included in discontinued operations for all periods presented, as discussed in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations.
The Company had 0 unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019, the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance, intended to clarify and improve certain topics, under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05 and ASU 2019-11 (collectively Topic 326). Topic 326 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income and requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in Topic 326 require the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminates the “incurred loss” methodology under current U.S. GAAP. The effective date for Topic 326 is for fiscal years (including the interim periods therein) beginning after December 15, 2019. Topic 326 must be adopted by applying a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company does not expect Topic 326 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption during the first quarter of 2020.

F-29

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 3–Real Estate Investments and Related Intangibles
Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company acquired controlling financial interests in 66 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $403.6 million (the “2019 Acquisitions”), which includes $2.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized. Additionally, the Company placed in service 1 build-to-suit development project in which the Company invested $27.6 million, including $0.7 million of external acquisition-related expenses and interest that were capitalized and including the land parcel acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired a controlling interest in 52 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $502.7 million (the “2018 Acquisitions”), which includes one land parcel for build-to-suit development, $2.1 million related to an outstanding tenant improvement allowance and $2.6 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company acquired a controlling interest in 88 commercial properties and 3 land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $748.8 million (the “2017 Acquisitions”), which includes $3.3 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized and includes 22 properties acquired in a nonmonetary exchange discussed below.
The following table presents the allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the periods presented (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Real estate investments, at cost:      
Land $83,476
 $86,285
 $110,634
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 268,470
 350,942
 523,445
Total tangible assets 351,946
 437,227
 634,079
Acquired intangible assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles (1)
 51,627
 62,791
 105,940
Above-market leases (2)
 
 2,750
 10,445
Assumed intangible liabilities:      
Below-market leases (3)
 
 (116) (1,680)
Total purchase price of assets acquired $403,573
 $502,652
 $748,784

(1)The weighted average amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles is 16.5 years, 16.3 years and 15.8 years for 2019 Acquisitions, 2018 Acquisitions and 2017 Acquisitions, respectively.
(2)The weighted average amortization period for acquired above-market leases is 10.8 years and 18.0 years for 2018 Acquisitions and 2017 Acquisitions, respectively.
(3)The weighted average amortization period for assumed intangible lease liabilities is 9.9 years and 13.8 years for 2018 Acquisitions and 2017 Acquisitions, respectively.
Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company disposed of 201 properties, including the sale of 6 consolidated properties to 2 newly-formed joint ventures in which the Company owns a 20% equity interest (the “Industrial Partnership”) and 1 property sold through a foreclosure as discussed in Note 6 –Debt, for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.2 billion, of which our share was $1.1 billion after the profit participation payments related to the disposition of 36 Red Lobster properties. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $1.1 billion after closing costs and contributions to the Industrial Partnership. The Company recorded a gain of $293.9 million related to the dispositions, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company disposed of 149 properties, including 1 property conveyed to a lender in a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, for an aggregate gross sales price of $526.4 million, of which our share was $504.3 million after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 34 Red Lobster properties. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $496.7 million after closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $96.2 million related to the sales which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

F-30

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company also disposed of 1 property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture for a gross sales price of $34.1 million, of which our share was $17.1 million based on our ownership interest in the joint venture, resulting in proceeds of $5.6 million after debt repayments of $20.4 million and closing costs. The Company recorded a gain of $0.7 million related to the sale and liquidation of the joint venture, which is included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company disposed of 137 properties, including 1 property owned by a consolidated joint venture, 6 properties transferred to the lender in either a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure sale transaction as discussed in Note 6 –Debt and 15 properties disposed of in connection with a nonmonetary exchange discussed below, for an aggregate gross sales price of $594.9 million, of which our share was $574.4 million after the profit participation payment related to the disposition of 31 Red Lobster properties and the consolidated joint venture partner’s share of the sales price. The dispositions resulted in proceeds of $445.5 million after a mortgage loan assumption of $66.0 million and closing costs. Additionally, the Company’s tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 included $1.7 million of Canadian tax gain on the sale of certain Canadian properties. The Company recorded a gain of $64.7 million, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 5 properties classified as held for sale with a carrying value of $27.0 million, included in real estate assets held for sale, net, primarily comprised of land of $6.3 million and building, fixtures and improvements, net of $19.8 million, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, which are expected to be sold in the next 12 months as part of the Company’s portfolio management strategy. As of December 31, 2018, there were 5 properties classified as held for sale. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded losses of $1.3 million, $1.9 million and $3.1 million respectively, related to held for sale properties.
Intangible Lease Assets and Liabilities
Intangible lease assets and liabilities of the Company consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands, except weighted-average useful life):
  Weighted-Average Useful Life December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Intangible lease assets:      
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $748,689 and $703,909, respectively 15.9 $854,196
 $980,971
Leasing commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $6,027 and $4,048, respectively 10.1 17,808
 15,660
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives, net of accumulated amortization of $112,438 and $105,936, respectively 16.3 165,483
 201,875
Total intangible lease assets, net   $1,037,487
 $1,198,506
       
Intangible lease liabilities:      
Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $99,315 and $89,905, respectively 19.1 $143,583
 $173,479

The aggregate amount of amortization of above‑ and below-market leases and deferred lease incentives included as a net decrease to rental revenue was $2.5 million, $4.2 million and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The aggregate amount of in-place leases, leasing commissions and other lease intangibles amortized and included in depreciation and amortization expense was $127.5 million, $139.6 million and $154.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

F-31

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The following table provides the projected amortization expense and adjustments to rental revenue related to the intangible lease assets and liabilities for the next five years as of December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
In-place leases and other intangibles:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense $116,812
 $108,990
 $95,237
 $84,843
 $74,347
Leasing commissions:          
Total projected to be included in amortization expense 2,361
 2,203
 2,102
 1,827
 1,612
Above-market lease assets and deferred lease incentives:        
Total projected to be deducted from rental revenue 19,301
 18,876
 18,064
 17,120
 15,749
Below-market lease liabilities:          
Total projected to be included in rental revenue 16,840
 15,189
 13,497
 12,774
 10,927

Nonmonetary Exchange
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed a nonmonetary exchange through the simultaneous acquisition of 22 Bob Evans properties and disposition of 15 Red Lobster properties. Pursuant to Nonmonetary Transactions, ASC (Topic 845), the cost of a nonmonetary asset acquired in exchange for another nonmonetary asset is the fair value of the asset surrendered to obtain the acquired nonmonetary asset, and a gain or loss should be recognized on the exchange. The fair value of the asset received should be used to measure the cost if the fair value of the asset received is more reliable than the fair value of the asset surrendered. The Company estimated the fair value of the Bob Evans and Red Lobster properties using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach and concluded that the fair value was $50.1 million. As the fair value of the assets received exceeded the book value of the assets surrendered, the Company recorded a gain of $7.4 million, which is included in gain on disposition of real estate and real estate assets held for sale, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Consolidated Joint Ventures
The Company had an interest in 1 consolidated joint venture that owned 1 property as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. As of each of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the consolidated joint venture had total assets of $32.5 million, of which $29.6 million and $29.9 million, respectively, were real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization at each of the respective dates. The property is secured by a mortgage note payable, which is non-recourse to the Company and had a balance of $14.3 million and $14.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company has the ability to control operating and financing policies of the consolidated joint venture. There are restrictions on the use of these assets as the Company would generally be required to obtain the approval of the joint venture partner in accordance with the joint venture agreement for any major transactions. The Company and the joint venture partner are subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint ventures consisted of interests in the Industrial Partnership and 1 unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2019 and an interest in 1 unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company disposed of 1 property owned by an unconsolidated joint venture as previously discussed in the “Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale” section herein.
The unconsolidated joint ventures had total aggregate debt outstanding of $269.3 million as of December 31, 2019, which is non-recourse to the Company, as discussed in Note 6 –Debt. There was 0 debt outstanding related to the unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2018.
The Company and the respective unconsolidated joint venture partners are subject to the provisions of the applicable joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls, including the Company’s share of expansion project capital expenditures. The following is a summary of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

F-32

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

      
Carrying Amount of Investment (1)
 
Equity in Income (2)
       Year Ended
Investment 
Ownership % (3)
 Number of Properties December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Faison JV Bethlehem GA 90% 1 $40,416
 $35,289
 $2,364
 $1,219
 $3,068
Industrial Partnership 20% 6 $28,409
 $
 $254
 $
 $

(1)The total carrying amount of the investments was greater than the underlying equity in net assets by $4.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. This difference relates to a purchase price allocation of goodwill and a step up in fair value of the investment assets acquired in connection with mergers. The step up in fair value was allocated to the individual investment assets and is being amortized in accordance with the Company’s depreciation policy.
(2)During the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities from the unconsolidated joint venture which disposed of its property during the year ended December 31, 2018.
(3)The Company’s ownership interest reflects its legal ownership interest. Legal ownership may, at times, not equal the Company’s economic interest in the listed properties because of various provisions in certain joint venture agreements regarding distributions of cash flow based on capital account balances, allocations of profits and losses and payments of preferred returns. As a result, the Company’s actual economic interest (as distinct from its legal ownership interest) in certain of the properties could fluctuate from time to time and may not wholly align with its legal ownership interests.
Note 4 –Rent and Tenant Receivables and Other Assets, Net
Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Straight-line rent receivable, net (1)
 $266,195
 $259,106
Accounts receivable, net (1)
 41,556
 36,939
Deferred costs, net (2)
 7,208
 17,515
Investment in direct financing leases, net 9,341
 13,254
Investment in Cole REITs (3)
 7,552
 7,844
Prepaid expenses 3,453
 5,022
Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net (4)
 4,809
 9,754
Other assets, net 8,281
 16,658
Total $348,395

$366,092
___________________________________
(1)As of December 31, 2018, allowance for uncollectible accounts included in straight-line rent receivable, net and accounts receivable, net was $1.0 million and $5.3 million, respectively. Upon adoption of ASC 842, the Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental revenue and does not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Any recoveries for those receivables reserved prior to adoption of ASC 842 will be recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue.
(2)Amortization expense for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facilities totaled $2.1 million, $7.3 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, inclusive of write-offs of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no related write-offs for the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017. Accumulated amortization for deferred costs related to the revolving credit facilities was $49.8 million and $47.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
(3)
On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of Cole Capital (as described in Note 14 —Discontinued Operations), retaining interests in CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V.
(4)
Amortization expense for leasehold improvements totaled $0.7 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2019 with no related write-offs and $1.2 millionfor each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, with no related write-offs. Accumulated amortization was $2.8 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Depreciation expense for property and equipment totaled $1.3 million, $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, inclusive of write-offs of less than $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Accumulated depreciation was $5.4 million and $7.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company disposed of $4.3 million, net, of leasehold improvements, property and equipment, which is included in restructuring expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.

F-33

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 5 – Fair Value Measures
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. U.S. GAAP guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. The Company does not expect that changes in classifications between levels will be frequent.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall (in thousands):


Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Assets:







Derivative assets
$
 $250
 $

$250
Investment in Cole REITs 
 
 7,552
 7,552
Total assets $
 $250
 $7,552
 $7,802
Liabilities:        
Derivative liabilities
$
 $(28,081) $

$(28,081)



Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2018
Assets:        
Derivative assets $
 $544
 $
 $544
Investment in Cole REITs 
 
 7,844
 7,844
Total assets $
 $544
 $7,844
 $8,388

Derivative Assets and Liabilities The Company’s derivative financial instruments relate to interest rate swaps. The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.

F-34

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investment in Cole REITs The fair values of CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V were estimated using the net asset value per share. Each of the Cole REIT’s share redemption programs includes restrictions that limit the number of shares redeemed by the respective Cole REIT.
The following are reconciliations of the changes in assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Investment in Cole REITs
Beginning balance, January 1, 2019 $7,844
Unrealized loss included in other income, net (292)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2019 $7,552
The following are reconciliations of the changes in assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
  Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Investment in Cole REITs
Beginning balance, January 1, 2018 $40,974
 $3,264
Total gains and losses    
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income, net (205) 
Realized loss included in other income, net (34) 
Unrealized gain included in other income, net 
 5,102
Purchases, issuance, settlements    
Return of principal received (4,864) 
Amortization included in net income, net 157
 
Sale of investments (36,028) (522)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2018 $
 $7,844

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.
Real Estate Investments The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of its real estate assets may not be recoverable.
As part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures, net real estate assets representing 77 properties were deemed to be impaired resulting in impairment charges of $47.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. The impairment charges relate to certain office, retail and restaurant properties that, during 2019, management identified for potential sale or determined, based on discussions with the current tenants, would not be re-leased by the tenant and the Company believes the property will not be leased to another tenant at a rental rate that supports the current book value.
During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 net real estate assets related to 70 and 69 properties, respectively, were deemed to be impaired resulting in impairment charges of $54.6 million and $50.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

F-35

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The Company estimates fair values using Level 3 inputs and uses a combined income and market approach, specifically using discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. The evaluation of real estate assets for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and make certain key assumptions, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) capitalization rate; (2) discount rates; (3) number of years property will be held; (4) property operating expenses; and (5) re-leasing assumptions including number of months to re-lease, market rental revenue and required tenant improvements. There are inherent uncertainties in making these estimates such as market conditions and performance and sustainability of the Company’s tenants. For the Company’s impairment tests for the real estate assets during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company used a range of discount rates from 7.9% to 8.7% with a weighted-average rate of 8.5% and capitalization rates from 7.4% to 8.2% with a weighted-average rate of 8.0%.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and accounts payable approximate their carrying value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets due to their short-term nature and are classified as Level 1 under the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are reported below (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Level Carrying Amount at December 31, 2019 Fair Value at December 31, 2019 Carrying Amount at December 31, 2018 Fair Value at December 31, 2018
Liabilities (1):
          
Mortgage notes payable and other debt, net 2 $1,535,918
 $1,590,915
 $1,933,209
 $1,961,496
Corporate bonds, net 2 2,839,581
 3,022,087
 3,395,885
 3,368,928
Convertible debt, net 2 319,947
 327,237
 398,591
 396,905
Credit facility 2 1,050,000
 1,050,000
 403,000
 403,000
Total liabilities   $5,745,446
 $5,990,239
 $6,130,685
 $6,130,329

(1)Current and prior period liabilities’ carrying and fair values exclude net deferred financing costs.
Debt – The fair value is estimated by an independent third party using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on management’s estimates of observable market interest rates. Corporate bonds and convertible debt are valued using quoted market prices in active markets with limited trading volume when available.

F-36

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 6 –Debt
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $5.7 billion of debt outstanding, including net premiums and net deferred financing costs, with a weighted-average years to maturity of 4.8 years and a weighted-average interest rate of 4.30%. The following table summarizes the carrying value of debt as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and the debt activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
     Year Ended December 31, 2019   
   Balance as of December 31, 2018 Debt Issuances Repayments, Extinguishment and Assumptions Accretion and Amortization Balance as of December 31, 2019 
Mortgage notes payable:           
 Outstanding balance $1,917,132
 $705
 $(388,780)
$
 $1,529,057
 
 
Net premiums (1)
 16,077
 
 (1,503) (7,713) 6,861
 
 Deferred costs (10,552) (96) 615
 2,249
 (7,784) 
Mortgages notes payable, net 1,922,657

609

(389,668)
(5,464)
1,528,134
 
            
Corporate bonds:         

 
 Outstanding balance 3,400,000
 600,000
 (1,150,000) 
 2,850,000
 
 
Discount (2)
 (4,115) (6,948) 
 644
 (10,419) 
 Deferred costs (27,276) (5,011) 2,144
 4,301
 (25,842) 
Corporate bonds, net 3,368,609

588,041

(1,147,856)
4,945

2,813,739
 
            
Convertible debt:         

 
 Outstanding balance 402,500
 
 (80,698) 
 321,802
 
 
Discount (2)
 (3,909) 
 391
 1,663
 (1,855) 
 Deferred costs (3,708) 
 372
 1,572
 (1,764) 
Convertible debt, net 394,883



(79,935)
3,235

318,183
 
             
Credit facility:         

 
 Outstanding balance 403,000
 1,386,000
 (739,000) 
 1,050,000
 
 
Deferred costs (3)
 (1,227) (4,279) 
 1,175
 (4,331) 
Credit facility, net 401,773

1,381,721

(739,000)
1,175

1,045,669
 
           

 
Total debt $6,087,922

$1,970,371

$(2,356,459)
$3,891

$5,705,725

(1)Net premiums on mortgage notes payable were recorded upon the assumption of the respective mortgage notes in relation to the various mergers and acquisitions. Amortization of these net premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective mortgage notes using the effective-interest method.
(2)Discounts on the corporate bonds and convertible debt were recorded based upon the fair value of the respective debt instruments as of the respective issuance dates. Amortization of these discounts is recorded as an increase to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(3)Deferred costs relate to the Credit Facility Term Loan, as defined in the “Credit Facility” section below.

F-37

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Mortgage Notes Payable
The Company’s mortgage notes payable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Encumbered Properties 
Gross Carrying Value of Collateralized Properties (1)
 Outstanding Balance 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate (2)
 
Weighted-Average Years to Maturity (3)
Fixed-rate debt 354
 $2,978,246
 $1,514,666
 5.05% 2.8
Variable-rate debt 1
 34,320
 14,391
 4.99%
(4) 
0.6
Total (5)
 355
 $3,012,566
 $1,529,057
 5.05% 2.8

(1)Gross carrying value is gross real estate assets, including investment in direct financing leases, net of gross real estate liabilities.
(2)Weighted average interest rate is computed using the interest rate in effect until the anticipated repayment date. Should the loan not be repaid at the anticipated repayment date, the applicable interest rate will increase as specified in the respective loan agreement until the extended maturity date.
(3)Weighted average years remaining to maturity is computed using the anticipated repayment date as specified in each loan agreement, where applicable.
(4)Weighted-average interest rate for variable-rate debt represents the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2019.
(5)The table above does not include mortgage notes associated with unconsolidated joint ventures of $269.3 million, which are non-recourse to the Company. The mortgage notes have a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 3.57% and mature on June 6, 2024.
The Company’s mortgage loan agreements generally restrict corporate guarantees and require the maintenance of financial covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as debt service coverage ratios and minimum net operating income). The mortgage loan agreements contain no dividend restrictions except in the event of default or when a distribution would drive liquidity below the applicable thresholds. At December 31, 2019, the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the mortgage loan agreements and had no restrictions on the payment of dividends.
On June 6, 2019, the Company received a notice of default from the lender of a non-recourse loan secured by one property, which had an outstanding balance of $19.5 millionon the notice date, due to intentional non-payment of amounts due in accordance with the loan documents. On July 2, 2019, a foreclosure sale occurred to settle the mortgage note obligation.
On April 12, 2018, the Company entered into a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreement with the lender of a mortgage loan, secured by 1 property, with an outstanding balance of $16.2 million at the time of default and conveyed all interest in the property to satisfy the mortgage loan.
The following table summarizes the scheduled aggregate principal repayments due on mortgage notes subsequent to December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Total
2020 $188,385
2021 299,015
2022 289,451
2023 124,217
2024 621,021
Thereafter 6,968
Total $1,529,057


F-38

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Corporate Bonds
As of December 31, 2019, the OP had $2.85 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Senior Notes”) outstanding comprised of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Outstanding Balance December 31, 2019 Interest Rate Maturity Date
2024 Senior Notes $500,000
 4.600% February 6, 2024
2025 Senior Notes 550,000
 4.625% November 1, 2025
2026 Senior Notes 600,000
 4.875% June 1, 2026
2027 Senior Notes 600,000
 3.950% August 15, 2027
2029 Senior Notes 600,000
 3.100% December 15, 2029
Total balance and weighted-average interest rate $2,850,000
 4.210%  

On February 6, 2019, $750.0 million of senior notes (the “2019 Senior Notes”) matured and the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, were repaid, utilizing borrowings under the Credit Facility Term Loan.
On December 4, 2019, the Company closed a senior note offering, consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Operating Partnership’s 3.10% Senior Notes due 2029 (the “2029 Senior Notes”).
On December 20, 2019, $400.0 million of the 4.125% senior notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”) were redeemed, and the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon was repaid.
The Senior Notes are guaranteed by the General Partner. The OP may redeem all or a part of any series of the Senior Notes at any time, at its option, for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Senior Notes. If the redemption date is 60 or fewer days prior to the maturity date with respect to the 2025 Senior Notes or is 90 or fewer days prior to the maturity date with respect to the 2024 Senior Notes, the 2026 Senior Notes, the 2027 Senior Notes and the 2029 Senior Notes, the redemption price will equal 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes of the applicable series to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. The Senior Notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and are freely transferable.
The indenture governing our Senior Notes requires us to maintain financial ratios which include maintaining (i) a maximum limitation on incurrence of total debt less than or equal to 65% of Total Assets (as defined in the indenture), (ii) maximum limitation on incurrence of secured debt less than or equal to 40% of Total Assets (as defined in the indenture), (iii) a minimum debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.5x and (iv) a minimum unencumbered asset value of at least 150% of the aggregate principal amount of all of the outstanding Unsecured Debt (as defined in the indenture). As of December 31, 2019, the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants of our Senior Notes based on the covenant limits and calculations in place at that time.
Convertible Debt
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repurchased $80.7 million of the 3.75% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2020 Convertible Notes”) and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s 2020 Convertible Notes had a balance of $321.8 million outstanding, which excludes the carrying value of the conversion options recorded within additional paid-in capital of $12.3 million and the unamortized discount of $1.9 million. The discount will be amortized over the remaining term of 1.0 year. The 2020 Convertible Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 3.75%.
The 2020 Convertible Notes may be converted into cash, shares of the Company’s Common Stock or a combination thereof, in limited circumstances prior to June 15, 2020, and may be converted into such consideration at any time on or after June 15, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the conversion rate was 66.7249 shares of the Company’s Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2020 Convertible Notes, which reflects adjustments to the initial conversion rate pursuant to the terms of the applicable indenture as a result of cash dividend payments. There were no changes to the terms of the 2020 Convertible Notes during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the indenture governing the 2020 Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2019.

F-39

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Credit Facility
On May 23, 2018, the General Partner, as guarantor, and the OP, as borrower, entered into a credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as administrative agent and other lenders party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provided for maximum borrowings of $2.9 billion, originally consisting of a $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $900.0 million unsecured term loan facility (the “Credit Facility Term Loan,” together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Facility”). Effective December 27, 2019, the Company reduced its Revolving Credit Facility from $2.0 billion to $1.5 billion.
As of December 31, 2019, $150.0 million was outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and the full $900.0 million was drawn on the Credit Facility Term Loan. The maximum aggregate dollar amount of letters of credit that may be outstanding at any one time under the Credit Facility is $50.0 million. As of December 31, 2019, letters of credit outstanding were $3.9 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, all letters of credit outstanding were terminated.
As discussed in Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities, on January 24, 2019, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million notional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, to hedge interest rate volatility. Due to an improvement in the Company's credit rating during the fourth quarter of 2019, the interest rate spread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at 3.59%.
The Revolving Credit Facility generally bears interest at an annual rate of London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.775% to 1.55% or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.55% (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating). “Base Rate” is defined as the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or a floating rate based on one month LIBOR plus 1.0%, determined on a daily basis. The Credit Facility Term Loan generally bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.75%, or Base Rate plus 0.00% to 0.75% (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating). In addition, the Credit Agreement provides the flexibility for interest rate auctions, pursuant to which, at the Company’s election, the Company may request that lenders make competitive bids to provide revolving loans, which competitive bids may be at pricing levels that differ from the foregoing interest rates.
In the event of default, at the election of a majority of the lenders (or automatically upon a bankruptcy event of default with respect to the OP or the General Partner), the commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility will terminate, and payment of any unpaid amounts in respect of the Credit Facility will be accelerated. The Revolving Credit Facility terminates on May 23, 2022, unless extended in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for 2 six-month extension options with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility, exercisable at the OP’s election and subject to certain customary conditions, as well as certain customary “amend and extend” provisions. The outstanding Credit Facility Term Loan matures on May 23, 2023. At any time, upon timely notice by the OP and subject to any breakage fees, the OP may prepay borrowings under the Credit Facility (subject to certain limitations applicable to the prepayment of any loans obtained through an interest rate auction, as described above). The OP incurs a facility fee equal to 0.10% to 0.30% per annum (based upon the General Partner’s then current credit rating) multiplied by the commitments (whether or not utilized) in respect of the Revolving Credit Facility. The OP also incurs customary administrative agent, letter of credit issuance, letter of credit fronting, extension and other fees.
The Credit Facility requires restrictions on corporate guarantees, as well as the maintenance of financial covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios (such as specified debt to equity and debt service coverage ratios). The key financial covenants in the Credit Facility, as defined and calculated per the terms of the Credit Agreement, include maintaining (i) a maximum leverage ratio less than or equal to 60%, (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.5x, (iii) a secured leverage ratio less than or equal to 45%, (iv) a total unencumbered asset value ratio less than or equal to 60% and (v) a minimum unencumbered interest coverage ratio of at least 1.75x. The Company believes that it was in compliance with the financial covenants pursuant to the Credit Agreement and is not restricted from accessing any borrowing availability under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019.
Note 7 –Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable-rate debt. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Company reclassified previously unrealized losses of $0.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive incomeentered into interest expense as a result of the hedged forecasted transactions affecting earnings. The Company also reclassified unrealized losses of $0.8rate swap agreements with an aggregate $900.0 million from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense associated with settled interest rate derivatives.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivativesnotional amount, effective on February 6, 2019 and maturing on January 31, 2023, which were designated that qualify as cash flow hedges is recognized directly in earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a gain of $1.6 million in earnings related to the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a gain of $2.5 million in such earnings. Earnings relatedDue to the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives designated that qualify as cash flow hedges are included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, netan improvement in the accompanying consolidated statementsCompany's credit rating during the fourth quarter of operations. The ineffectiveness is primarily attributable to2019, the designation of acquired interest rate swaps with a non-zero fair valuespread on the $900.0 million Credit Facility Term Loan was reduced by 25 bps to LIBOR + 1.10%, and beginning on November 1, 2019, the swap agreements effectively fixed the Credit Facility Term Loan interest rate at inception associated with a prior merger.3.59%.


F-48F-40

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company terminated six of its interest rate swaps in connection with the early repayment of mortgage loans and borrowings under the Credit Facility Term Loan, as discussed in Note 10 –Debt, and accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive income to earnings as a result of a portion of the hedged forecasted transactions becoming probable not to occur. A gain of $1.1 million was recorded in relation to the acceleration, which is included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $0.3 million will be reclassified from other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, loans associated with thirteen derivative instruments with an aggregate notional value of $662.4 million at2019, the respective settlement date, were repaid in full and one derivative previously designated as a cash flow hedgeCompany also entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional valueamount of $27.8$400.0 million, was de-designated as it was not probable the forecasted hedged transaction would occur. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives thatwhich were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the anticipated issuance of long-term debt. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 120 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest rate risk (dollar amounts in thousands):
Interest Rate Swaps December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Number of Instruments 
 14
Notional Amount $
 $690,816
on existing financial instruments), with anticipated issuance of 10-year public debt between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges as well as their classification in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and2019 (in thousands). There were no financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):2018.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Balance Sheet Location December 31, 2019
Interest rate swaps Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net $250
Interest rate swaps Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities $(28,081)

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Balance Sheet Location December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Interest rate swaps Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net $
 $3
Interest rate swaps Deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities $
 $(3,547)
During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, the Company recorded unrealized losses of $29.9 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, for changes in the fair value of the cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income. There were 0 similar amounts recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company reclassified previous losses of $2.5 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense as a result of the hedged transactions impacting earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company also reclassified losses of $0.8 million from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense associated with settled interest rate derivatives and reclassified a gain of $1.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense in connection with the early termination of its interest rate swaps related to early repayment of mortgage loans and borrowings under the Credit Facility Term Loan.
During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $8.3 million will be reclassified from other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the requirements to be classified as hedging instruments. A gain of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the change in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments was recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded a loss of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
As discussed above, during the year ended December 31, 2017, one derivative previously designated as a cash flow hedge with a notional value of $27.8 million was de-designated as it was not probable the forecasted hedged transaction would occur. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had the following outstanding0 interest rate derivativesswaps that were not designated as qualifying hedging relationships (dollar amounts in thousands):
Interest Rate Swap December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Number of Instruments 2
 1
Notional Amount $78,949
 $51,400
relationships. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had 1 interest rate swap that was not designated as a qualifying hedging relationship, with a notional amount of $50.7 million.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments not designated as a hedge as well as their classification in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 20162018 (in thousands):
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Balance Sheet Location December 31, 2018
Interest rate swaps Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net $544

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Balance Sheet Location December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Interest rate swaps Rent and tenant receivables and other assets, net $627
 $196
A loss of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and gains of $0.4 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were recorded in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.


F-49F-41

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Tabular Disclosure of Offsetting Derivatives
The table below details a gross presentation, the effects of offsetting and a net presentation of the Company’s derivatives as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 (in thousands). The net amounts of derivative assets or liabilities can be reconciled to the tabular disclosure of fair value.
  Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
  Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
December 31, 2019 $250
 $(28,081) $
 $250
 $(28,081) $
 $
 $(27,831)
December 31, 2018 $544
 $
 $
 $544
 $
 $
 $
 $544
  Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
  Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
December 31, 2017 $627
 $
 $
 $627
 $
 $
 $
 $627
December 31, 2016 $199
 $(3,547) $
 $199
 $(3,547) $
 $
 $(3,348)

Credit Risk Related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision specifying that if the Company either defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements and was not in breach of any provisions in these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions,agreements, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their aggregate termination value of $0.6$28.2 million at December 31, 2017.2019.
Note 12 8 Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
Supplemental cash flow information was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Supplemental disclosures:      
Cash paid for interest $281,490
 $267,400
 $260,951
Cash paid for income taxes $5,019
 $5,589
 $11,280
Cash received from federal income tax refund $
 $2,939
 $16,686
Non-cash investing and financing activities:      
Accrued capital expenditures, tenant improvements and real estate developments $13,412
 $12,648
 $6,578
Accrued deferred financing costs $1,100
 $67
 $
Real estate contributions to Industrial Partnership $29,577
 $
 $
Distributions declared and unpaid $150,365
 $148,383
 $149,768
Distributions payable relinquished $12,522
 $
 $
Mortgage note payable relieved by foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure $19,525
 $16,200
 $100,388
Mortgage notes payable assumed in real estate disposition $
 $
 $66,000
Real estate investments received from a ground lease expiration and other lease related transactions $3,800
 $1,386
 $259
Real estate investments received from a property-related legal settlement $
 $
 $775
Establishment of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities $236,286
 $
 $
Nonmonetary exchanges:      
Exchange of real estate investments $8,900
 $
 $50,204
Real estate investments relinquished and gain on disposition $
 $
 $(47,474)
Rent and tenant receivables, intangible lease liability and other assets, net $
 $
 $(2,511)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Supplemental Disclosures:      
Cash paid for interest $260,951
 $317,170
 $343,854
Cash paid for income taxes $11,280
 $20,279
 $14,179
Cash received from federal income tax refund $16,686
 $
 $
Non-cash investing and financing activities:      
Accrued capital expenditures and real estate developments $6,578
 $7,701
 $1,499
Accrued deferred financing costs $
 $3
 $
Distributions declared and unpaid $149,768
 $149,281
 $133,817
Accrued equity issuance costs $
 $9
 $
Mortgage note payable relieved by foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure $100,388
 $38,050
 $53,798
Mortgage notes payable assumed in real estate disposition $66,000
 $55,000
 $425,021
Real estate investments received from a ground lease expiration $259
 $
 $
Real estate investments received from a property-related legal settlement $775
 $
 $
Nonmonetary Exchanges:      
Real estate investments received $50,204
 $
 $
Real estate investments relinquished and gain on disposition $(47,474) $
 $
Rent and tenant receivables, intangible lease liability and other assets, net $(2,511) $
 $


F-50F-42

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Note 13 9 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Accrued interest $31,925
 $43,916
Accrued legal fees and litigation settlements 
 25,571
 32,715
Accrued real estate and other taxes 25,320
 25,208
Accounts payable 1,779
 2,673
Accrued other 41,725
 41,099
Total $126,320
 $145,611
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Accrued interest $47,116
 $43,188
Accrued real estate taxes 26,131
 38,433
Accrued legal fees 30,854
 17,827
Accounts payable 2,570
 4,524
Accrued other 29,803
 30,889
Total $136,474
 $134,861

Note 1410Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings and claims incidental to the ordinary course of its business. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Company, except as follows:
Government Investigations and Litigation Relating to the Audit Committee Investigation
As previously reported, on October 29, 2014, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “October 29 8-K”) reporting the Audit Committee’s conclusion, based on the preliminary findings of its investigation, that certain previously issued consolidated financial statements of the Company, including those included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, and related financial information should no longer be relied upon. The Company also reported that the Audit Committee had based its conclusion on the preliminary findings of its investigation into concerns regarding accounting practices and other matters that were first reported to the Audit Committee in early September 2014 and that the Audit Committee believed that an error in the calculation of adjusted funds from operations for the first quarter of 2014 had been identified but intentionally not corrected when the Company reported its financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. Prior to the filing of the October 29 8-K, the Audit Committee previewed for the SEC the information contained in the filing. Subsequent to that filing, the SEC provided notice that it had commenced a formal investigation and issued subpoenas calling for the production of various documents. In addition, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York contacted counsel for the Audit Committee and counsel for the Company with respect to this matter, and the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts issued a subpoena calling for the production of various documents. The Company has been cooperating with these regulators in their investigations.
In connection with these investigations, on September 8, 2016, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced the filing of criminal charges against the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer (the “Former CFO”) and former Chief Accounting Officer (the “Criminal Action”), as well as the fact that the former Chief Accounting Officer pleaded guilty to the charges filed. Also on September 8, 2016, the SEC announced the filing of a civil complaint against the same two2 individuals in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SEC Civil Action”).York. On June 30, 2017, following a jury trial, the former Chief Financial OfficerFormer CFO was convicted of the charges filed. Both the former Chief Accounting Officer and the former Chief Financial OfficerFormer CFO have entered into settlement agreements with the SEC resolving the charges brought against them.
The United States Attorney’s Office has indicated that it does not intend to bring criminal charges against the Company arising from its investigation. In addition, the Company has not been in contact with the Massachusetts regulator since June 2015 and believes the investigation is concluded. On November 18, 2019, the Company announced it had reached agreement with the staff of the Enforcement Division of the SEC on the material terms of a negotiated resolution relating to the SEC's investigation of the matters disclosed in the Company's October 29 8-K. The agreement with the SEC staff, which is subject to documentation and approval by the SEC's Commissioners, includes payment of $8.0 million as a civil penalty. 
As discussed below, the Company and certain of its former officers and directors have beenwere named as defendants in a number of lawsuits filed following the October 29 8-K, including class actions, derivativeindividual actions and individualderivative actions seeking money damages and other relief under the federal securities laws and state laws in both federal and state courts in New York, Maryland and Arizona.


F-51F-43

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


Between October 30, 2014 and January 20, 2015, the Company and certain of its former officers and directors, among other individuals and entities, were named as defendants in ten10 securities class action complaints filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The court consolidated these actions under the caption In re American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Litigation, No. 15-MC-00040 (AKH) (the “SDNY Consolidated Securities Class“Class Action”). The plaintiffs filed a second amended class action complaint on December 11, 2015, which asserted claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Certain defendants, including the Company and the OP, filed motions to dismiss the second amended class action complaint (or portions thereof), which were granted in part and denied in part by the court. The Company and the OP answered the second amended class action complaint on July 29, 2016. On September 8,30, 2016, the court issued an order directing plaintiffs to filefiled a third amended complaint to reflect certain prior rulings by the court. The third amended complaint was filed on September 30, 2016 and the defendants were not requiredcourt in connection with various motions to file new answers. Discovery is ongoing. Plaintiffs in the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action filed a motion for class certification and a hearing on the motion was held on August 24, 2017.dismiss. On August 31, 2017, the court issued ordersan order granting plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and granting summary judgment to defendants with respect to one of plaintiffs’ claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. The defendants filedcertification. Defendants’ petitions seeking leave to appeal the court’s order granting class certification which were denied on January 24, 2018. A status conferenceOn September 8, 2019, the Company, along with the other parties to the Class Action, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) providing for the settlement of the Class Action, and on September 30, 2019, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Class Action Settlement”) consistent with the terms of the MOU. Pursuant to the Class Action Settlement, certain defendants agreed to pay in the aggregate $1.025 billion, comprised of contributions from the principals of the Company's former external manager, ARC Properties Advisors, LLC, (the “Former Manager”) totaling $225.0 million, $12.5 million from the Company’s Former CFO, $49.0 million from the Company’s former auditor, and the balance of $738.5 million from the Company, which is included in litigation and non-routine costs, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. The contribution from the Company’s Former Manager is inclusive of the value of substantially all of the Limited Partner OP Units and dividends surrendered to the Company in July 2019 as a result of a settlement by the Former Manager and certain of its principals with the SEC, totaling approximately $32.0 million, which is included in litigation and non-routine costs, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Class Action Settlement does not contain any admission of liability, wrongdoing or responsibility by any of the parties. The Class Action Settlement was approved by the court is scheduled for June 11, 2018.on January 21, 2020, and a final judgment dismissing the Class Action was entered on January 22, 2020.
The Company, certain of its former officers and directors, and the OP, among others, havewere also been named as defendants in additional13 individual securities fraud actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: Jet Capital Master Fund, L.P. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-307;15-cv-307 (the “Jet Capital Action”); Twin Securities, Inc. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-1291; HG Vora Special Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-4107; BlackRock ACS US Equity Tracker Fund, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08464; PIMCO Funds: PIMCO Diversified Income Fund, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08466; Clearline Capital Partners LP, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08467; Pentwater Equity Opportunities Master Fund Ltd., et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-08510; Archer Capital Master Fund, et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al, No. 16-cv-05471; Atlas Master Fund et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 16-cv-05475; Eton Park Fund, L.P. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., No. 16-cv-09393; Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, et al, v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al, No. 17-cv-02796; and Fir Tree Capital Opportunity Master Fund, L.P. et al. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 17-cv-04975 (the “Fir Tree Action”)17-cv-04975; and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares, Inc. et al v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al., No. 18-cv-06770, (collectively, the “Opt-Out Actions”). The Opt-Out Actions assertasserted claims arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities. Discovery inThe Company entered into a series of agreements dated September 30 through October 26, 2018, to settle all of the Opt-Out Actions is being coordinated with discovery inother than the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action.Jet Capital Action (the “Opt-Out Settlement Agreements”), which were brought by plaintiffs holding shares of common stock and swaps referencing common stock representing approximately 18.0% of VEREIT’s outstanding shares of common stock held at the end of the period covered by the litigations, for an aggregate payment of $127.5 million. The Opt-Out Settlement Agreements contain mutual releases by both plaintiffs and the Company and do not contain any admission of liability, wrongdoing or responsibility by any of the parties.
On October 27, 2015, the Company and certain of its former officers, among others, were also named as defendants in an individual securities fraud action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, captioned Vanguard Specialized Funds, et al. v. VEREIT, Inc. et al., No. 15-cv-02157 (the “Vanguard Action”). The Vanguard Action assertsasserted claims arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities. On January 21, 2016,June 7, 2018, the Company filedentered into a motionSettlement Agreement and Release (the “Vanguard Settlement Agreement”) to transfersettle the Vanguard Action for a payment of $90.0 million. The Vanguard Settlement Agreement contains mutual releases by Plaintiffs and the Company, and does not contain any admission of liability, wrongdoing or responsibility by any of the parties. Vanguard’s holdings accounted for approximately 13.0% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock held at the end of the period covered by the various pending shareholder actions.

F-44

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 (Continued)

In addition to the United States Districtsettlement of the Opt-Out Actions and the Vanguard Action discussed above, between February 5, 2019 and April 5, 2019, the Company entered into a series of agreements to settle claims with shareholders who decided not to participate as class members in the Class Action. Pursuant to the terms of these settlement agreements, the shareholders released all claims that were the subject matter of the Class Action and the Company made payments totaling $27.9 million.
On June 24, 2019, the Company and certain of its former officers were named as defendants in an individual action filed in the Supreme Court forof the Southern DistrictState of New York captioned Lakewood Capital Partners, L.P. v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., et al., Index No. 653676/2019 (the “Lakewood Action”), alleging claims of common law fraud arising out of allegedly false and a motionmisleading statements similar to dismissthose that were the complaint. subject of the Class Action.
On September 29, 2016,6 and September 9, 2019, the courtCompany entered an order denying the Company’s motion to transferinto settlement agreements and granting in part and denying in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. The Company filed an answerreleases similar to the complaint on November 4, 2016. DiscoveryOpt-Out Settlement Agreements to settle the only 2 remaining opt-out actions - the Jet Capital Action and the Lakewood Action - for a total of $27.0 million, which is ongoingincluded in litigation and in large part is being coordinated with discoverynon-routine costs, net in the SDNY Consolidated Securities Action.accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company was also named as a nominal defendant, and certain of its former officers and directors were named as defendants, in shareholder derivative actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: Witchko v. Schorsch, et al., No. 15-cv-06043 (the “Witchko Action”); and Serafin, et al. v. Schorsch, et al., No. 15-cv-08563 (the “Serafin Action”). The court consolidated the Witchko Action and the Serafin Action (together “the SDNYthe “SDNY Derivative Action”) and the plaintiffs designated the complaint filed in the Witchko Action as the operative complaint in the SDNY Derivative Action. The SDNY Derivative Action seekssought money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, among other claims. On February 12, 2016,In conjunction with entering into the Class Action Settlement, the Company and other defendants filed a motionentered into an agreement to dismissresolve the claims asserted in the SDNY Derivative Action, due to plaintiffs’ failure to plead facts demonstrating thatas well as the Board’s decision to refuse plaintiffs’ pre-suit demands was wrongfulclaims asserted in the Frampton Action, the Kosky Action, and not a protected business judgment.the Meloche Action (each as defined below) (the “Derivative Settlement”). On June 9, 2016,January 21, 2020, the court granted in partfinal approval of the settlement, and denied in part the Company’s and other defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on June 30, 2016, and the Company and other defendants filed answers to the amended complaint on July 22, 2016. Discovery in the Witchko Action is being coordinated with discovery ina final judgment dismissing the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action.

F-52

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Derivative Action was entered on January 22, 2020.
On December 3, 2015, the Company was named as a nominal defendant and certain of its former officers and directors were named as defendants in a shareholder derivative action filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in Maryland, Frampton v. Schorsch, et al., No. 24-C-15-006269 (the “Frampton Action”). The Frampton Action seekssought money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for, among other things, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and contribution and indemnification. By order dated November 4, 2016, the Frampton Action was stayed pending resolution of the SDNY Derivative Action. On January 31, 2020, the plaintiff in the Frampton Action filed a notice dismissing the Frampton Action with prejudice.
On June 10, 2016, the Company was named as a nominal defendant, and certain of its former officers and directors, among others, were named as defendants, in a shareholder derivative action filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kosky v. Schorsch, et al., No. 653093/2016 (the “Kosky Action”). The Kosky Action seekssought money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for, among other things, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, negligence, and breach of contract. On October 6, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation staying the Kosky Action until resolution of the SDNY Consolidated Securities Class Action. In light of the release of claims in the Derivative Settlement, the Company expects that the parties in the Kosky Action will jointly seek to dismiss the Kosky Action with prejudice.
On October 6, 2016, the Company was named as a nominal defendant, and certain of its former officers and directors, among others, were named as defendants, in a shareholder derivative action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, captioned Meloche v. Schorsch, et al., 16-cv-03366 (the “Meloche Action”). An amended complaint was filed on January 17, 2017. The Meloche Action seeks money damages and other relief on behalf of the Company for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and negligence. By order dated May 16, 2017, the Meloche Action was stayed until resolution of the SDNY Derivative Action.
The Company has not reserved amounts for anyAction, and by order dated October 25, 2019, the stay was continued. In light of the litigation or investigation matters discussed above either because it has not concluded that a loss is probablerelease of claims in the particular matter or because for some matters, it believesDerivative Settlement, the Company expects that a loss is probable but that any probable loss or reasonably possible range of loss is not reasonably estimable at this time. The Company is currently unablethe parties in the Meloche Action will jointly seek to reasonably estimate a range of reasonably possible loss because these matters involve significant uncertainties, includingdismiss the complexity of the facts, the legal theories and the nature of the claims, as well as the methodology for determining damages. The ultimate resolution of these matters, the timing and substance of which is unknown, may materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.Meloche Action with prejudice.
Cole Litigation Matter
In December 2013, Realistic Partners filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company and the then-members of its board of directors in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, captioned Realistic Partners v. American Realty Capital Partners, et al., No. 654468/2013. Cole was later added as a defendant. The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the board of the Company breached its fiduciary duties in connection with the transactions contemplated under the agreement and plan of merger with Cole Merger Agreement (in connection with the merger between a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole and Cole Holdings Corporation) and that Cole aided and abetted those breaches.Real Estate Investments, Inc. In January 2014, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding settlement of all claims asserted on behalf of the alleged class of the Company’s stockholders. The proposed settlement terms required the Company to make certain additional disclosures related to the Cole Merger,this merger, which were included in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on

F-45

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 (Continued)

January 17, 2014. The memorandum of understanding also contemplated that the parties would enter into a stipulation of settlement, which would be subject to customary conditions, including confirmatory discovery and court approval following notice to the Company’s stockholders, and provided that the defendants would not object to a payment of up to $625,000 for attorneys’ fees. If the parties enter into a stipulation of settlement, which has not occurred, a hearing will be scheduled at which the court will consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement. There can be no assurance that the parties will enter into a stipulation of settlement, that the court will approve any proposed settlement, or that any eventual settlement will be under the same terms as those contemplated by the memorandum of understanding.

Purchase Commitments
F-53

TableIn the normal course of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Contractual Lease Obligations
The following table reflects the minimum base rent payments due frombusiness, the Company over the next five years and thereafter for certain ground lease obligations, which are substantially reimbursable by our tenants, and office lease obligations (in thousands):
  Future Minimum Base Rent Payments
  Ground Leases Office Leases
2018 $14,523
 $4,394
2019 14,467
 4,359
2020 14,350
 4,389
2021 13,721
 4,368
2022 13,935
 4,419
Thereafter 211,514
 3,995
Total $282,510
 $25,924
Purchase Commitments
Cole Capital enters into various types of commitments to purchase and sale agreements and deposits funds into escrow towards the purchase of real estate assets, most of whichproperties. These commitments are expected to be assigned to one of the Cole REITs at or priorgenerally subject to the closingCompany’s customary due diligence process and, accordingly, a number of specific conditions must be met before the respective acquisition. As of December 31, 2017, Cole Capital was a party to 13 purchase and sale agreements with unaffiliated third-party sellersCompany is obligated to purchase a 100% interest in 13 properties, subject to meeting certain criteria, for an aggregate purchase price of $209.0 million, exclusive of closing costs. As of December 31, 2017, Cole Capital had $4.8 million of property escrow deposits held by escrow agents in connection with these future property acquisitions, which may be forfeited if the transactions are not completed under certain circumstances. Cole Capital will be reimbursed by the assigned Cole REIT for amounts escrowed when the property is assigned to the respective Cole REIT.properties.
Environmental Matters
In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. The Company has not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim, and is not aware of any other environmental condition, in each case, that it believes will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations.
Note 1511 - Leases
Lessor
The Company is the lessor for its 3,858 retail, restaurant, office and industrial properties. The Company’s operating and direct financing leases have non-cancelable lease terms of 0.08 years to 25.1 years. Certain leases with tenants include options to extend or terminate the lease agreements or to purchase the underlying asset. Lease agreements may also contain rent increases that are based on an index or rate (e.g., the consumer price index (“CPI”) or LIBOR). The Company believes the residual value risk is not a primary risk because of the long-lived nature of the assets.
The components of rental revenue from the Company’s operating and direct financing leases were as follows (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Fixed:      
Cash rent $1,102,538
 $1,121,482
 $1,110,983
Straight-line rent 28,032
 39,772
 46,968
Lease intangible amortization (2,538) (4,178) (5,366)
Property operating cost reimbursements 5,559
 5,375
 3,056
Sub-lease (1)
 21,496
 16,178
 16,383
Total fixed
1,155,087
 1,178,629

1,172,024
       
Variable (2)

81,310

78,179

78,699
Income from direct financing leases 837
 1,059
 1,562
Total rental revenue
$1,237,234

$1,257,867

$1,252,285
____________________________________
(1)The Company’s tenants are generally sub-tenants under certain ground leases and are responsible for paying the rent under these leases.
(2)Includes costs reimbursed related to property operating expenses, common area maintenance and percentage rent, including these costs reimbursed by ground lease sub-tenants.

F-46

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The following table presents future minimum operating lease payments due to the Company over the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands). These amounts exclude contingent rent payments, as applicable, that may be collected from certain tenants based on provisions related to sales thresholds and increases in annual rent based on exceeding certain economic indexes.
  Future Minimum Operating Lease Payments 
Future Minimum
Direct Financing Lease Payments
(1)
2020 $1,066,215
 $2,215
2021 1,035,373
 2,095
2022 966,765
 2,006
2023 889,768
 1,646
2024 811,274
 590
Thereafter 4,675,575
 824
Total $9,444,970
 $9,376

(1)
Related to22 properties which are subject to direct financing leases and, therefore, revenue is recognized as rental income on the discounted cash flows of the lease payments. Amounts reflect undiscounted cash flows to be received by the Company under the lease agreements on these respective properties.
Lessee
The Company is the lessee under ground lease arrangements and corporate office leases. All leases for which the Company is the lessee meet the criteria of an operating lease. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of 0.2 years to 79.6 years, some of which include options to extend. The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s operating leases was 16.3 years as of December 31, 2019. Under certain ground lease arrangements, the Company pays variable costs, including property operating expenses and common area maintenance, which are generally reimbursed by the ground lease sub-tenants. The weighted average discount rate for the Company’s operating leases was 4.91% as of December 31, 2019. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company used an estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the adoption date in determining the present value of lease payments.
The Company incorporated renewal periods in the calculation of the majority of ground lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Pursuant to certain leases, the Company is required to execute renewal options available under the ground lease through the building lease term. No renewals were incorporated in the calculation of the corporate lease right-of-use assets and liabilities, as it is not reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the options. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
The following table presents the lease expense components for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating lease cost (1)
 $24,392
Sublease income (2)
 $(21,496)


(1)NaN cash paid for operating lease liabilities was capitalized.
(2)The Company’s tenants are generally sub-tenants under certain ground leases and are responsible for paying the rent under these leases.
Subsequent to initial measurement of $233.3 million and $236.3 million, respectively, the Company reduced the right-of-use assets by $2.1 million and operating lease liabilities by $2.6 million, for non-cash activity related to additions, dispositions and lease modifications during the year ended December 31, 2019.

F-47

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The following table reflects the future minimum lease payments due from the Company over the next five years and thereafter for ground lease obligations, which are substantially reimbursable by our tenants, and office lease obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands).
  Future Minimum Lease Payments
2020 $22,287
2021 22,284
2022 22,122
2023 21,695
2024 21,132
Thereafter 225,457
Total 334,977
Less: imputed interest 113,916
Total $221,061

The following table reflects the future minimum lease payments due from the Company over the five years subsequent to December 31, 2018, as disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands), which excluded certain ground leases under which the Company's sub-tenants are responsible for paying the rent under these leases directly to the ground lessor.
  Future Minimum Lease Payments
2019 $18,479
2020 18,191
2021 17,929
2022 18,118
2023 17,772
Thereafter 196,670
Total $287,159

Note 12 – Equity
Common Stock and General Partner OP Units
The General Partner is authorized to issue up to 1.5 billion shares of Common Stock. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the General Partner had approximately 974.2 million1.1 billion shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.
Additionally, the Operating Partnership had approximately 974.2 million1.1 billion General Partner OP Units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017,2019, corresponding to the General Partner’s outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Common Stock OfferingsOffering
On August 10, 2016,September 26, 2019, the Company issued 69.0completed a public equity offering (the "Offering"), selling a total of 94.3 million shares of Common Stock, in a public offeringwhich included the full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares, for net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and offering costs,expenses, of $702.5 million, which were used$886.9 million. The Company contributed the net proceeds from the Offering to the OP in part to repay the 2016 Term Loan and amounts under the Credit Facility. Concurrently, the Operating Partnership issued the General Partner 69.0 millionexchange for additional General Partner OP Units.Units, which have substantially identical economic terms as the Company’s common stock. The net proceeds of the Offering were subsequently used to pay amounts owed in connection with the settlement of certain litigation, as described in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies, and for general corporate purposes.
Common Stock Continuous Offering ProgramPrograms
On September 19, 2016, the Company registered a continuous equity offering program (the “Program”“Prior Program”) pursuant to which the Company cancould offer and sell, from time to time, through September 19, 2019 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions, shares of Common Stock with an aggregate gross sales price of up to $750.0 million, through its sales agents. As of and during the year ended December 31, 2017, no2019, the Company had issued 5.0 million shares under the Prior Program, at a weighted average price per share of $8.42, for gross proceeds of $42.5 million. The weighted average price per share, net of offering costs, was $8.30, for net proceeds of $41.8 million. Prior to 2019, 0 shares of Common Stock havehad been issued pursuant to the Prior Program.


F-54F-48

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


PreferredOn April 15, 2019, the Company established a new continuous equity offering program pursuant to which the Company may sell shares of Common Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $750.0 million from time to time through April 15, 2022 in “at-the-market” offerings or certain other transactions ( the “Current ATM Program”). The Current ATM Program replaced the Prior Program. The proceeds from any sale of shares under the Current ATM Program have been or will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding potential acquisitions and Preferred OP Unitsrepurchasing or repaying outstanding indebtedness. As of and during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had issued 9.0 million shares under the Current ATM Program, at a weighted average price per share of $9.60, for gross proceeds of $86.7 million. The weighted average price per share, net of offering costs, was $9.46, for net proceeds of $85.4 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $663.3 million available to be sold under the Current ATM Program.
Series F Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 42.8 million shares of and Series F Preferred Stock (and approximately 42.8 million corresponding General Partner Series F Preferred Units) and 86,874 Limited Partner Series F PreferredOP Units issued and outstanding.
The Series F Preferred Stock pays cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 6.70% per annum on their liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (equivalent to $1.675 per share on an annual basis). The Series F Preferred Stock iswas not redeemable by the Company before January 3, 2019, the fifth anniversary of the date on which such Series F Preferred Stock was issued (the “Initial Redemption Date”), except under circumstances intended to preserve the General Partner’s status as a REIT for federal and/or state income tax purposes and except upon the occurrence of a change of control. On and after the Initial Redemption Date, the General Partner may, at its option, redeem shares of the Series F Preferred Stock, in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus, subject to exceptions, any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date fixed for redemption. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless the General Partner redeems or otherwise repurchases them or they become convertible and are converted into Common Stock (or, if applicable, alternative consideration). The Series F Preferred Stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “VER PRF”.VER PRF. The Series F Preferred Units contain the same terms as the Series F Preferred Stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company redeemed a total of 12.0 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock, in 2 separate transactions, representing approximately 28.02% of the issued and outstanding preferred shares as of the beginning of the year. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock were redeemed at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.
As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 30.9 million shares of Series F Preferred Stock, approximately 30.9 million corresponding General Partner Series F Preferred Units and 49,766 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding.
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nontaxablenondividend distributions. NontaxableNondividend distributions will reduce U.S stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares. The following table shows the character of the Series F Preferred Stock distributions paid on a percentage basis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015:2017:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Ordinary dividends 71.7% 100.0% 95.0%
Capital gain distributions 28.3% % 5.0%
Total 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Ordinary dividends 95.0% 95.0% 75.9%
Nondividend distributions % % %
Capital gain distributions 5.0% 5.0% 24.1%
Total 100% 100% 100%

Limited Partner OP Units
As of each December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,2019 the Operating Partnership had approximately 23.750.8 million Limited Partner OP Units outstanding.
AsOn July 16, 2019, the SEC filed a complaint in United States District Court for the Southern District of December 31, 2017,New York charging the Company’s Former Manager (including certain of its principals) with securities law violations for, among other things, wrongfully obtaining certain incentive fees in connection with mergers entered into by the Company has received redemption requests totaling approximately 13.1in 2013 and 2014. Simultaneously with the filing of the complaint, the parties entered into proposed settlement agreements, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, pursuant to which 2.9 million Limited Partner OP Units from certain affiliates ofwere surrendered by the Former Manager which would have been redeemable for a corresponding number of shares of Common Stock.and the Former CFO to the Company. The Company believes it has potential claims against recipientsrecorded the surrender of those OP Units and has engaged in discussions with affiliates of the Former Manager regarding the redemption requests. Pending any resolution, the Company does not currently intend to satisfy any of the redemption requests. In light of the potential claims, since October 15, 2015, the OP has not paid distributions in respect of a substantial portion of the outstanding Limited Partner OP Units whenas a reduction to litigation and non-routine costs, net, of $26.5 million, using a per share price of $9.08, during the Common Stocksecond quarter of 2019. In addition to surrendering the 2.9 million Limited Partner OP Units, the Former Manager and the Former CFO relinquished any rights to $6.4 million of dividends on those units, which the Company had withheld payment of since October 2015. The court

F-49

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

approved the settlements on July 17, 2019 and the Limited Partner OP Units were otherwise paid.subsequently canceled on July 26, 2019. As discussed in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies, the contribution to the Class Action Settlement by the Company’s Former Manager included the value of substantially all of these surrendered Limited Partner OP Units and dividends.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Former Manager and Former CFO surrendered an aggregate of 19.9 million Limited Partner OP Units to the Company to fund a portion of their contributions toward the Class Action Settlement. On October 15, 2019, the Company contributed cash to the settlement fund equal to the value of the surrendered Limited Partner OP Units and the surrendered Limited Partner OP Units were canceled. The Company reduced additional paid-in capital, distributions payable and non–controlling interests in the accompanying financial statements of VEREIT, Inc. for both of the above-mentioned transactions and made a corresponding reduction in distributions payable, General Partner's common equity and Limited Partner's common equity in the accompanying financial statements of the OP. Refer to Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.
Common Stock Dividends
The Company declared quarterly dividends to stockholders of record each quarter from the thirdfirst quarter of the year ended December 31, 20152017 through the third quarter of the year ended December 31, 20172019 of $0.1375 per share of common stockCommon Stock (representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share). The Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stockCommon Stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share) for the fourth quarter of 20172019 on November 7, 20175, 2019 to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2017,2019, which was paid on January 16, 2018.15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP unit.
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nontaxablenondividend distributions. NontaxableNondividend distributions will reduce U.S stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares. The following table shows the character of the common stockCommon Stock distributions paid on a percentage basis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015:

2017:
F-55
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Ordinary dividends 45.0% 13.8% 60.0%
Nondividend distributions 37.2% 86.2% 37.0%
Capital gain distributions 17.8% % 3.0%
Total 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Ordinary dividends 60.0% 95.0% 75.9%
Nondividend distributions 37.0% % %
Capital gain distributions 3.0% 5.0% 24.1%
Total 100% 100% 100%
Share Repurchase ProgramPrograms
On May 12, 2017,3, 2018, the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors terminated its prior share repurchase program and authorized a new program (the “2018 Share Repurchase Program”) that permitted the Company to repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’sits outstanding Common Stock over the subsequent 12 months,through May 3, 2019, as market conditions warrantwarranted. On May 6, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the “Share“2019 Share Repurchase Program”). Repurchases may that permits the Company to repurchase up to $200.0 million of its outstanding Common Stock through May 6, 2022. Under the share repurchase programs, repurchases can be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, structured or derivative transactions, including accelerated stock repurchase transactions, or other methods of acquiring shares in accordance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements. The Share Repurchase Program doesshare repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to make any repurchases at a specific time or in a specific situation. Repurchasessituation and repurchases are subject toinfluenced by prevailing market conditions, the trading price of the stock,Common Stock, the Company’s financial performance and other conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased 68,759 shares of Common Stock in multiple open market transactions for $0.5 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program, which are currently deemed to be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Additional sharesShares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company under the Share Repurchase Program,share repurchase programs, if any, will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.
Common Stock Repurchases to Settle Tax Obligations
Under the General Partner’s Equity Plan (defined below), individuals have the option to have the General Partner repurchase shares vesting from awards madeThere were 0 share repurchases under the Equity Plan in order to satisfy2018 Share Repurchase Program or 2019 Share Repurchase Program during the minimum federal and state tax withholding obligations.year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $200.0 million available for share repurchases under the 2019 Share Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, the General PartnerCompany repurchased 268,5500.8 million shares to satisfyof Common Stock in multiple open market transactions, at a weighted average share price of $6.95 for an aggregate purchase price of $5.6 million under the federal and state tax withholding obligations on behalf of employees.2018 Share Repurchase Program.

F-50

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 16 –13– Equity-based Compensation
Equity PlanPlans
The General Partner has adopted an equity plan (the “Equity Plan”),Equity Plan, which provides for the grant of stock options (“Stock Options”), stock appreciation rights, restricted shares of Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”),Shares, restricted stock units (“Restricted Stock Units”), deferred stock units (“Deferred Stock Units”), dividend equivalent rights and other stock-based awards to the General Partner’s and its affiliates’ non-executive directors, officers, and other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the General Partner or its affiliates. To date,Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under U.S. GAAP for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is recognized over the General Partner has granted fully vested shares of Common Stock, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock Units under the Equity Plan.requisite service period. Restricted Shares provide for rights identical to those of Common Stock. Restricted Stock Units do not provide for any rights of a common stockholder prior to the vesting of such Restricted Stock Units. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, Restricted Shares are considered issued and outstanding. As is the case when fully vested shares of Common Stock are issued from the Equity Plan, for each Restricted Share awarded under the Equity Plan, the Operating Partnership issues a General Partner OP Unit to the General Partner with identical terms. Upon vesting or settlement of Restricted Stock Units or Deferred Stock Units, respectively, the Operating Partnership issues a General Partner OP Unit to the General Partner for each share of Common Stock issued as a result of such vesting.
The General Partner has authorized and reserved a total number of shares equal to 10.0% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (on a fully diluted basis assuming the redemption of all OP Units for shares of Common Stock) to be issued at any time under the Equity Plan for equity incentive awards. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the General Partner had cumulatively awarded under its Equity Plan approximately 16.4 million shares of Common Stock, which was comprised of 4.0 million Restricted Shares, net of the forfeiture of 3.7 million Restricted Shares through that date, 4.26.4 million Restricted Stock Units, net of the forfeiture/cancellation of 1.22.0 million Restricted Stock Units through that date, and 0.30.6 million Deferred Stock Units, collectively representing approximately 8.5and 5.4 million sharesStock Options, net of Common Stock.forfeiture/cancellation/exercise of 0.2 million Stock Options through that date. Accordingly, as of such date, approximately 91.396.6 million additional shares were available for future issuance.
Duringissuance, excluding the year endedeffect of the 5.4 million Stock Options. As of December 31, 2015,2019, a total of 45,000 shares had been awarded under the General Partner awarded 5,634 shares of Common Stock. The fair valuenon-executive director restricted share plan out of the awards was determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and expensed in full on the grant date. The Company recorded $0.1 million of compensation expense related to the awards99,000 shares reserved for the year ended December 31, 2015. No such shares of Common Stock were awarded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

F-56

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

issuance.
Restricted Shares
The Company has issued Restricted Shares to certain employees and non-executive directors beginning in 2011. In addition, the Company issued Restricted Shares to employees of affiliates of the Former Manager prior to 2015. The fair value of the Restricted Shares granted to employees under the Equity Plan is generally determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and is expensed over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. The fair value of Restricted Shares granted to non-executive directors and employees of affiliates of the Former Manager under the Equity Plan was measured based upon the fair value of goods or services received or the equity instruments granted, whichever was more reliably determinable, and was expensed in full at the date of grant.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, the Company recorded $2.0$0.1 million, $2.7$0.6 million and $3.9$2.0 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to the Restricted Shares. As ofDuring the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, all 71,000 of the Restricted Shares vested. As such, there was $0.7 million of0 further unrecognized compensation expense related to the Restricted Shares with a weighted-average remaining termas of 1.2 years.December 31, 2019.
The following table details the activity of the Restricted Shares during the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:
  Restricted Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested shares, December 31, 2018 71,000
 $14.04
Vested (71,000) 14.04
Unvested shares, December 31, 2019 
 $


F-51

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)
  Restricted Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested shares, December 31, 2015 1,239,662
 $13.86
Granted 
 
Vested (586,863) 13.91
Forfeited (90,393) 14.08
Unvested shares, December 31, 2016 562,406
 $13.78
Granted 
 
Vested (266,378) 13.55
Forfeited (61,600) 13.98
Unvested shares, December 31, 2017 234,428
 $13.98

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units
Under the Equity Plan, the Company may award Restricted Stock Units to employees that will vest if the recipient maintains his/her employment over the requisite service period (the “Time-Based Restricted Stock Units”). The fair value of the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units granted to employees under the Equity Plan is generally determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and is expensed over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis, which is generally three years. During each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company recorded $5.1 million of compensation expense related to Time-Based Restricted Stock Units. During the year ended December 31, 2019, this includes compensation expense attributable to awards for which the requisite service period begins prior to the assumed future grant date. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $6.3 million $3.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units.such expenses. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there was $5.8$5.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units with a weighted-average remaining term of 1.72.0 years.
The following table details the activity of the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units during the year ended December 31, 2019.
  Time-Based Restricted Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2018 1,291,015
 $7.51
Granted 609,071
 8.16
Vested (621,854) 7.71
Forfeited (26,631) 7.43
Unvested units, December 31, 2019 1,251,601
 $7.73

Deferred Stock Units
The Company may award Deferred Stock Units to non-executive directors under the Equity Plan (the “Deferred Stock Units”).Plan. Each Deferred Stock Unit represents the right to receive one1 share of Common Stock. The Deferred Stock Units provide for immediate vesting on the grant date and will be settled with Common Stock either on the earlier of the date on which the respective director separates from the Company, dies or the third anniversary of the grant date, or if granted pursuant to the director’s voluntary election to participate in the director’s deferred compensation program, on the date the director separates from the Company (or upon a change of control or death). The fair value of the Deferred Stock Units is determined using the closing stock price on the grant date and is expensed over the requisite service period or on the grant date for awards with no requisite service period. During each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded approximately $1.2 million of expense related to Deferred Stock Units. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recorded approximately $1.0 million of expense related to Deferred Stock Units. During each of the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015, the Company recorded approximately $0.8 million of expense related to Deferred Stock Units.such expenses. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there is no0 unrecognized compensation expense related to the Deferred Stock Units.

F-57

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table details the activity of the Time-Based Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock Units during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
  Deferred Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2018 
 $
Granted 151,953
 8.55
Vested (151,953) 8.55
Unvested units, December 31, 2019 
 $
  Time-Based Restricted Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Deferred Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2015 589,138
 $9.61
 
 $
Granted 736,427
 7.82
 87,513
 9.18
Vested (199,556) 9.52
 (87,513) 9.18
Forfeited (40,095) 8.68
 
 
Unvested units, December 31, 2016 1,085,914
 $8.43
 
 $
Granted 673,381
 8.90
 127,588
 8.22
Vested (425,967) 8.61
 (127,588) 8.22
Forfeited (20,463) 8.54
 
 
Unvested units, December 31, 2017 1,312,865
 $8.61
 
 $
Market-Based Restricted Stock Units
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the General Partner awarded Restricted Stock Units to certain employees under the Equity Plan that were contingent upon the Common Stock reaching a certain market price (the “Market-Based Restricted Stock Units”). The Market-Based Restricted Stock Units were contingent upon the closing price of the Common Stock equaling or exceeding $10 per share for 20 consecutive trading days (the “Market Condition”) and the grantee’s continued employment as of such date on which the Market Condition was met. On July 28, 2016, 610,839 Market-Based Restricted Stock Units vested, of which 199,858 shares were withheld to cover grantees’ tax withholding obligations, resulting in 410,981 shares being issued.
The fair value and derived service period of the Market-Based Restricted Stock Units as of their grant date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, which took into account multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the Market Condition. The method required the input of assumptions, including the future dividend yield and expected volatility of the Common Stock. Compensation expense was recognized on a straight-line basis over the derived service period regardless of whether the Market Condition was satisfied, provided that the requisite service condition had been achieved. The Market-Based Restricted Stock Units were fully expensed during the year ended December 31, 2015; however, the Company recorded contra-expense due to the forfeiture of such awards. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded contra-expense of $0.8 million related to forfeitures and expense of $6.0 million, respectively. There were no such expenses related to the Market-Based Restricted Stock Units for the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to the Market-Based Restricted Stock Units.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
The General Partner may award long-term incentive-based Restricted Stock Units (the “LTI Target Awards”) to employees under the Equity Plan. Vesting of the LTI Target Awards is based upon the General Partner’s level of achievement of total stockholder return (“TSR”), including both share price appreciation and Common Stock dividends, as measured equally against a market index and against a peer group generally over a three year period.
The fair value and derived service period of the LTI Target Awards as of their grant date is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation which takes into account multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the required TSR, as outlined in the award agreements. This method requires the input of assumptions, including the future dividend yield, the expected volatility of the Common Stock and the expected volatility of the market index constituents and the peer group. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the derivedrequisite service period regardless of whether the necessary TSR is attained, provided that the requisite service condition has been achieved. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, the Company recorded $7.4$5.5 million, $4.6$5.8 million and $1.9$7.4 million, respectively, of expense related to the LTI Target Awards. As

F-52

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

of December 31, 2017,2019, there was $6.1$6.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the LTI Target Awards with a weighted-average remaining term of 1.72.1 years. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 671,712 LTI Target Awards were canceled as a result of the awards not meeting the vesting criteria as of the measurement date.

F-58

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table details the activity of the LTI Target Awards during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
  LTI Target Awards Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2018 1,616,963
 $7.57
Granted 734,057
 8.11
Vested (581,122) 8.95
Forfeited (155,802) 8.84
Unvested units, December 31, 2019 1,614,096
 $7.20

Stock Options
The General Partner may award Stock Options to employees that will vest if the recipient maintains constant employment through the end of the requisite service period.
The fair value of the Stock Options as of their grant date is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the input of assumptions including expected terms, expected volatility, dividend yield and risk free rate. Expected term was calculated using the midpoint between the three year cliff vesting period and the 10-year contractual term. Expected volatilities were based on both historical and implied volatilities. The risk-free interest rate was based on zero-coupon yields derived from the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity yield curve in effect as of the grant date.
The following inputs and assumptions were used to calculate the weighted-average fair values of the options granted at the date of grant as follows:
  February 20, 2019 February 21, 2018
Expected term (in years) 6.5
 6.5
Volatility 24.21% 27.39%
Dividend yield 7.09% 7.21%
Risk-free rate 2.52% 2.75%
Grant date fair value $0.74
 $0.76

Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period above. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded $1.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of expense related to Stock Options. As of December 31, 2019, there was $2.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to Stock Options with a weighted-average remaining term of 1.8 years.
The following table details the activity of the Stock Options during the year ended December 31, 2019.
  Stock Options Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2018 2,763,165
 $6.84
 9.14
 $856,581
Granted 2,797,302
 8.26
 
 
Exercised (42,765) 6.84
 
 (77,345)
Forfeited (155,672) 7.21
 
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 5,362,030
 $7.57
 8.66
 $8,954,271


F-53

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Note 14 —Discontinued Operations
On November 13, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement (as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2018, the “Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement”). On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its investment management segment, Cole Capital, under the terms of the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment operations were conducted through Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. (“CCA”), an Arizona corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the OP. The OP sold all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCA and certain of CCA’s subsidiaries to the Cole Purchaser, an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC for approximately $120.0 million paid in cash at closing. The Company could also earn up to an aggregate of $80.0 million of Net Revenue Payments in each calendar year through December 31, 2023 if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold in a calendar year. There were 0 Net Revenue Payments received or earned since the sale. Substantially all of the Cole Capital segment financial results are reflected in the financial statements as discontinued operations. There were no discontinued operations or cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were also no assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations and real estate assets held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
The following is a summary of the financial information for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
 Market-Based Restricted Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value LTI Target Awards Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested units, December 31, 2015704,804
 $8.58
 731,448
 $11.38
Granted
 
 855,471
 7.14
Vested(610,839) 8.58
 (8,065) 11.44
Forfeited(93,965) 8.58
 (56,367) 11.15
Unvested units, December 31, 2016
 $
 1,522,487
 $9.00
Granted
 
 726,867
 8.96
Forfeited or canceled
 
 (675,125) 11.34
Unvested units, December 31, 2017$
 $
 1,574,229
 $7.98
  Year Ended

 2018 2017
Revenues:    
Offering-related fees and reimbursements $1,027
 $16,096
Transaction service fees and reimbursements 334
 13,929
Management fees and reimbursements 6,452
 76,214
Total revenues
7,813

106,239
Operating expenses:    
Cole Capital reallowed fees and commissions 602
 9,879
Transaction costs (1)
 (654) 3,802
General and administrative 4,450
 63,783
Amortization of intangible assets 
 14,490
Total operating expenses
4,398

91,954
Other income, net 
 464
Loss on disposition and assets held for sale (1,815) (20,027)
Income (loss) before taxes
1,600

(5,278)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes 2,095
 (13,839)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
$3,695

$(19,117)

(1)The negative balance for the year ended December 31, 2018 is a result of estimated costs accrued in prior periods that exceeded actual expenses incurred.
The following is a summary of cash flows related to discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
  Year Ended
  2018 2017
Cash flows related to discontinued operations:    
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities $(10,468) $33,232
Cash flows from investing activities $122,915
 $

Income Taxes
Cole Capital’s business, substantially all of which was conducted through a TRS, recognized a benefit of $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 and a provision of $13.8 million the year ended December 31, 2017. There was 0 related benefit or provision for the year ended December 31, 2019.

F-54

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

The following table presents the reconciliation of the (benefit from) provision for income taxes with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
  Year Ended
  2018 2017
Income (loss) before taxes $1,600
 $(5,278)
Less: Income from non-taxable entities (685) (9,523)
Income (loss) attributable to taxable subsidiaries before income taxes $915
 $(14,801)
     
Federal benefit from (provision for) at statutory rate 192
 (5,180)
Impairment of goodwill 
 
Nondeductible portion of transaction costs and loss recognized on classification as held for sale (719) 8,283
Impact of change in federal tax rate 
 3,481
Impact of valuation allowance (1,158) 6,165
State income taxes and other (410) 1,090
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes - Cole Capital $(2,095) $13,839

The following table presents the components of the (benefit from) provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
  Year Ended
  2018 2017
Current    
Federal $(74) $(120)
State (166) 602
Total current (benefit from) provision for income taxes (240) 482
Deferred    
Federal (1,756) 12,016
State (99) 1,341
Total deferred (benefit from) provision for income taxes (1,855) 13,357
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes - Cole Capital $(2,095) $13,839

Note 1715Related Party Transactions and Arrangements
Cole Capital
TheThrough February 1, 2018, the Company was contractually responsible for managing CCIT II, CCIT III, Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc. (“CCPT IV”), CCPT V, and CIM Income NAV, Inc. (formerly known as Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc.) (“INAV” and collectively with CCIT II, CCIT III, CCPT IV, CCPT V, the Cole REITs’“Cole REITs”) affairs on a day-to-day basis, identifying and making acquisitions and investments on the Cole REITs’ behalf, and recommending to the respective board of directors of each of the Cole REITs an approach for providing investors with liquidity. In addition, the Company was responsible for raising capital for certain Cole REITs, advised them regarding offerings, managed relationships with participating broker-dealers and financial advisors, and provided assistance in connection with compliance matters relating to the offerings. The Company received compensation and reimbursement for services relating to the Cole REITs’ offerings and the investment, management and disposition of their respective assets, as applicable.
As discussed in Note 514 —Discontinued Operations,, on February 1, 2018, the Company entered intocompleted the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell substantially allsale of Cole Capital. The sale closed on February 1, 2018. The assets and liabilities transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement and related financial results are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. At closing,As a result of the Company entered into the Services Agreement with thesale of Cole Purchaser pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to the Cole Purchaser andCapital, the Cole REITs including operational real estate support, overare no longer affiliated with the next year. UnderCompany.
During the terms of the Services Agreement,years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company will be entitled to receive reimbursement for certainearned $8.0 million and $106.7 million, respectively of theoffering-related, transaction services provided. The Company could also receive Net Revenue Payments over the next six years if future revenues of Cole Capital exceed a specified dollar threshold, up to an aggregate of $80.0 million in Net Revenue Payments.
Offering-Related Revenue
The Company generally received a selling commission, dealer manager fee and/or a distribution and stockholder servicing fee based on the gross offering proceeds related to the sale of shares ofmanagement fees and reimbursements from the Cole REITs’ common stock in their primary offerings. The Company reallowed 100% of selling commissions earned to participating broker-dealers. The Company, in its sole discretion, could reallow all or a portion of its dealer manager and distribution and stockholder servicing fee toREITs. NaN such participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement, based on factors such as the volume of shares issued by such participating broker-dealers and the amount of marketing support provided. No selling commissions or dealer manager fees were paid toearned during the Company or other broker-dealers with respect to shares issued under the respective Cole REIT’s distribution reinvestment plan, under which the stockholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares.year ended December 31, 2019.



F-59F-55

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


The following table shows the offering fee summary information for the Cole REITs conducting offerings as of December 31, 2017:
  
Selling Commissions (1)
 
Dealer Manager Fees (2)
 
Annual Distribution and Stockholder Servicing Fee (2)
 
Open Programs (3)(4)
       
        
CCPT V (5)
       
Class A Shares 7% 2% —% 
Class T Shares (6)
 3% 2% 1%
(7)(8) 
        
INAV       
Wrap Class Shares —% 0.55%
(8) 
—% 
Advisor Class Shares up to 3.75% 0.55%
(8) 
0.5%
(8) 
Institutional Class Shares —% 0.25%
(8) 
—% 
        
CCIT III (5)
       
Class A Shares 7% 2% —% 
Class T Shares 3% 2% 1%
(8) 

(1)The Company reallowed 100% of selling commissions to participating broker-dealers during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
(2)The Company could reallow all or a portion of its dealer manager fee and/or distribution and stockholder servicing fee to participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement.
(3)The Company received selling commissions, an asset-based dealer manager fee and/or an asset-based distribution and stockholder servicing fee, all based on the net asset value for each class of common stock.
(4)CCIT II closed its offering during the three months ended September 30, 2016. The program’s fee structure was similar to that of CCPT V.
(5)The maximum amount of the distribution and stockholder servicing fees with respect to sales of Class T shares was 4.0% of the gross offering proceeds for CCPT V and CCIT III. Distribution and stockholder servicing fees continue to be paid after the offering closes if the 4.0% maximum has not been met.
(6)Commencing on April 29, 2016, CCPT V began offering Class T shares of common stock in addition to the class of shares of common stock previously offered (now referred to as Class A shares).
(7)During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the annual distribution and stockholder servicing fee was amended to be 1.0%. Prior to the amendment, the distribution and stockholder servicing fee was 0.8% per annum.
(8)Fees were accrued daily in the amount of 1/365th of a percentage of the estimated per share NAV and payable monthly in arrears. Distribution and stockholder servicing fees continue to be paid after the offering closes.
Transaction Service Revenue
The Company earned acquisition fees related to the acquisition, development or construction of properties on behalf of certain of the Cole REITs. In addition, the Company was reimbursed for acquisition expenses incurred in the process of acquiring properties up to certain limits per the respective advisory agreement. The Company was not reimbursed for personnel costs in connection with services for which it receives acquisition fees or real estate commissions. In addition, the Company could earn disposition fees related to the sale of one or more properties, including those held indirectly through joint ventures, on behalf of a Cole REIT and other affiliates.

F-60

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The following table shows the transaction-related fees for the Cole REITs as of December 31, 2017:
Program 
Acquisition Fees (1)
 Disposition Fees 
Performance Fees (2)
 
Financing Coordination Fee (3)
Open Programs        
CCPT V 2% 1% 15% 
INAV    
CCIT III 2% 1% 15% 1%
         
Closed Programs        
CCIT II 2% 1% 15% 
CCPT IV 2% 1% 15% 

(1)Percent was taken on gross purchase price.
(2)Performance fee was paid only under the following circumstances: (i) if shares are listed on a national securities exchange; (ii) if the respective Cole REIT is sold or the assets are liquidated; or (iii) upon termination of the advisory agreement. In connection with such events, the performance fee will only be earned upon the return to investors of their net capital invested and a 6% annual cumulative, non-compounded return (8% in the case of CCIT II and CCPT IV).
(3)Financing coordination fee payable for services in connection with the origination, assumption, or refinancing of any debt (other than loans advanced by the Company) to acquire properties or make other permitted investments.
Management Service Revenue
The Company earned advisory and asset and property management fees from certain Cole REITs. The Company was also reimbursed for expenses incurred in providing advisory and asset and property management services, subject to certain limitations. In addition, the Company earned a performance fee relating to INAV for any year in which the total return on stockholders’ capital exceeded 6% per annum on a calendar year basis.
The following table shows the management fees for the Cole REITs as of December 31, 2017:
Program 
Asset Management / Advisory Fees (1)
 
Performance Fees (2)
Open Programs    
CCPT V 0.65% - 0.75% 
INAV 0.90% 25%
CCIT III 0.65% - 0.75% 
     
Closed Programs    
CCIT II 0.65% - 0.75% 
CCPT IV 0.65% - 0.75% 

(1)    Annualized fee was based on the average monthly invested assets or average assets, as defined in the respective agreements, or net asset value, if available.
(2)    The performance fee was limited to 10% of the aggregate total return, for each class, for any individual year.

F-61

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

The table below reflects the revenue earned from the Cole REITs (including closed programs, as applicable) and joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands).
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Offering-related fees and reimbursements      
Selling commissions (1)
 $7,746
 $19,943
 $14,101
Dealer manager and distribution fees (2)
 5,021
 8,300
 5,133
Reimbursement revenue 3,329
 8,283
 5,178
Offering-related fees and reimbursements 16,096
 36,526
 24,412
       
Transaction service fees and reimbursements      
Acquisition fees 11,049
 9,513
 18,742
Financing coordination fee 100
 220
 
Disposition fees (3)
 
 
 4,974
Reimbursement revenues 2,780
 2,800
 2,164
Transaction service fees and reimbursements 13,929
 12,533
 25,880
       
Management fees and reimbursements      
Asset and property management fees and leasing fees 220
 220
 452
Advisory and performance fee revenue 57,765
 51,099
 44,948
Reimbursement revenues 18,449
 17,587
 13,845
Management fees and reimbursements 76,434
 68,906
 59,245
       
Interest income on Affiliate Lines of Credit 262
 453
 1,275
       
Total related party revenues (4)
 $106,721
 $118,418
 $110,812

(1)The Company reallowed 100% of selling commissions to participating broker-dealers during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
(2)During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company reallowed $2.1 million, $3.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of dealer manager fees and/or distribution and stockholder servicing fees to participating broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement.
(3)The Company earned a disposition fee of $4.4 million on behalf of CCIT when CCIT merged with Select Income REIT on January 29, 2015.
(4)Total related party revenues excludes fees earned from 1031 real estate programs of $1.8 million, $1.4 million and $5.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Investment in the Cole REITs
On February 1, 2018, the Company sold certain of its equity investments, recognizing a gain of $0.6 million, which is included in other income, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, to the Cole Purchaser, retaining interests in CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V. As of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the Company owned aggregate equity investments of $3.3$7.6 million and $4.7$7.8 million, respectively, in CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V. During the Cole REITs andyear ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a loss of $0.3 million related to the change in fair value, which is included in other affiliated offerings, which are presented in investment in unconsolidated entitiesincome, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, asstatements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company retained certain interests subsequent torecognized a $5.1 million gain from measuring the sale of Cole Capital. The Company accountsCompany’s investments in CCIT II, CCIT III and CCPT V at fair value after the investments were no longer accounted for these investments using the equity method, of accounting which requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of equityis included in other income, net in the respective Cole REIT’s earnings and distributions. Theaccompanying consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company records its proportionate sharerecognized a net loss of net income or loss$0.5 million from the Cole REITs, which was included in equity in income and gain on disposition of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized a net loss of $0.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, from the Cole REITs. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded net income of $0.1 million from the Cole REITs.
The table below presents certain information related to the Company’s investments in the Cole REITs as of December 31, 2017 (carrying amount in thousands):
  December 31, 2017
Cole REIT % of Outstanding Shares Owned Carrying Amount of Investment
CCPT V 0.76% $1,231
INAV 0.05% 125
CCIT II 0.44% 1,126
CCIT III 14.25% 675
CCPT IV 0.01% 107
Total   $3,264

F-62

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Due to Affiliates
Due to affiliates was $66,000 and $16,000 as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, related to amounts due to the Cole REITs.
Due from Affiliates, Net
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $4.4 million and $5.2 million, respectively, was expected to be collected from affiliates, excluding any outstanding balances from a line of credit with one of the Cole REITs, discussed below, related to services provided by the Company and expenses subject to reimbursement by the Cole REITs in accordance with their respective advisory and property management agreements. These amounts will be settled with the respective Cole REIT and were not transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement.
On September 23, 2016, the Company entered into a $30.0 million revolving line of credit (the “Subordinate Promissory Note”) with Cole Corporate Income Operating Partnership III, LP (“CCI III OP”), the operating partnership of CCIT III (the “Subordinate Promissory Note Agreement”). The Subordinate Promissory Note bears variable interest rates of one-month LIBOR plus the Credit Facility Margin (as defined in the Subordinate Promissory Note Agreement), which ranges from 2.20% to 2.75%, plus 1.75% and matured on September 22, 2017. On March 28, 2017, CCI III OP entered into a modification agreement in order to extend the maturity date of the Subordinate Promissory Note from September 22, 2017 to September 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, the Subordinate Promissory Note had an interest rate of 5.6% and $1.6 million and $10.3 million were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Subordinate Promissory Note was not transferred pursuant to the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company had revolving line of credit agreements in place with CCIT II and CCPT V (the “Affiliate Lines of Credit”) that provided for maximum borrowings of $60.0 million to each of CCIT II and CCPT V and bore variable interest rates of one month LIBOR plus 2.20%. As of December 31, 2015, there was $50.0 million outstanding on the Affiliate Lines of Credit. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Affiliate Lines of Credit matured and no amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 or 2016.entities.
Note 18 16 Net Income (Loss) Per Share/Unit
The General Partner’s unvested Restricted Shares contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered to be participating securities in accordance with U.S. GAAP and, therefore, are included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class computation method. Under the two-class computation method, net losses are not allocated to participating securities unless the holder of the security has a contractual obligation to share in the losses. The unvested Restricted Shares are not allocated losses as the awards do not have a contractual obligation to share in losses of the General Partner. The two-class computation method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of shares of Common Stock and participating securities according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings.

F-63

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted net income (loss)loss per share computation for the General Partner for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019
2018 2017
(Loss) income from continuing operations $(307,106) $(91,725) $51,495
Noncontrolling interests’ loss (income) from continuing operations 6,753
 2,344
 (1,005)
Net (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to the General Partner (300,353) (89,381) 50,490
Dividends to preferred shares and units (68,488) (71,892) (71,892)
Net loss from continuing operations available to the General Partner (368,841) (161,273) (21,402)
Earnings allocated to participating securities 
 (42) (491)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
(Income) loss from discontinued operations attributable to limited partners 
 (88) 445
Net loss used in basic and diluted net loss per share $(368,841) $(157,708) $(40,565)
       
Weighted average number of Common Stock outstanding - basic and diluted 998,139,969
 969,092,268
 974,098,652
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (1)
 $(0.37) $(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Amounts may not total due to rounding.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017
2016 2015
Income (loss) from continuing operations $51,495
 $(76,887) $(138,992)
Noncontrolling interests’ share in continuing operations (1,005) 1,908
 2,341
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the General Partner 50,490
 (74,979) (136,651)
Dividends to preferred shares and units (71,892) (71,892) (71,892)
Net loss from continuing operations available to the General Partner (21,402) (146,871) (208,543)
Earnings allocated to participating securities (491) (492) (410)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (19,117) (123,937) (184,500)
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to limited partners 445
 3,053
 4,798
Net loss available to common stockholders used in basic and diluted net loss per share $(40,565) $(268,247) $(388,655)
       
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted 974,098,652
 931,422,844
 903,360,763
       
Basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders $(0.02) $(0.13) $(0.20)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43)
For the year ended December 31, 2017, diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders excludes approximately 0.3 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units and approximately 23.7 million OP Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders excludes approximately 0.9 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units and approximately 23.8 million OP Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders excludes approximately 3.3 million of unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units and approximately 23.8 million OP Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.



F-64F-56

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


The following were excluded from diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, as the effect would have been antidilutive:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Weighted average unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units (1)
 1,594,049
 420,369
 310,965
Weighted average stock options (1)
 520,258
 
 
Weighted average Limited Partner OP Units 17,980,514
 23,725,506
 23,748,347
_______________________________________________
(1)Net of assumed repurchases in accordance with the treasury stock method.
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted net income (loss)loss per unit attributable to common unitholders, which includes all common general partnerGeneral Partner unitholders and limited partner unitholders. The computation for the OPunitholders, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,

 2019 2018 2017
(Loss) income from continuing operations $(307,106) $(91,725) $51,495
Noncontrolling interests’ loss from continuing operations 102
 154
 194
Net (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to the Operating Partnership (307,004) (91,571) $51,689
Dividends to preferred units (68,488) (71,892) (71,892)
Net loss from continuing operations available to the Operating Partnership
(375,492) (163,463) (20,203)
Earnings allocated to participating units 
 (42) (491)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 
 3,695
 (19,117)
Net loss used in basic and diluted net loss per unit $(375,492) $(159,810) $(39,811)
       
Weighted average number of common units outstanding - basic and diluted 1,016,120,483
 992,817,774
 997,846,999
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.37) $(0.17) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $
 $0.00
 $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders(1)

$(0.37)
$(0.16) $(0.04)

(1)Amounts may not total due to rounding.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Income (loss) from continuing operations $51,495
 $(76,887) $(138,992)
Noncontrolling interests’ share in continuing operations 194
 14
 (1,274)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Operating Partnership 51,689
 (76,873) (140,266)
Dividends to preferred units (71,892) (71,892) (71,892)
Net loss from continuing operations available to the Operating Partnership (20,203) (148,765) (212,158)
Earnings allocated to participating units (491) (492) (410)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (19,117) (123,937) (184,500)
Net loss available to common unitholders used in basic and diluted net loss per unit $(39,811) $(273,194) $(397,068)
       
Weighted average number of common units outstanding - basic and diluted 997,846,999
 955,181,238
 927,124,560
       
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.02) $(0.16) $(0.23)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders $(0.02) $(0.13) $(0.20)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders $(0.04) $(0.29) $(0.43)
For the year ended December 31, 2017,The following were excluded from diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders, excludes approximately 0.3 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.antidilutive:
For the year ended December 31, 2016, diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders excludes approximately 0.9 million unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Weighted average unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units (1)
 1,594,049
 420,369
 310,965
Weighted average stock options (1)
 520,258
 
 
_______________________________________________
(1)Net of assumed repurchases in accordance with the treasury stock method.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, diluted net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders excludes approximately 3.3 million of unvested Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units as the effect would have been antidilutive.
F-57

Note 19 – Income Taxes
The General Partner currently qualifies and has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. As a REIT, the General Partner generally is not subject to federal income tax, with the exception of its TRS entities. However, the General Partner, including its TRS entities, and the Operating Partnership are still subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. The Company recognized state and local income and franchise tax expense of $6.9 million, $6.0 million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.1 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to a TRS entity, which are also included in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No provision for income taxes related to a TRS entity was recorded for year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015. Any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Canadian federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions, and is subject to routine examinations by the respective tax authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal or state examinations by tax authorities for years before 2013.

F-65

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 2019 (Continued)


As of December 31, 2017, the OP and the General Partner had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the OP, the General Partner, American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc., CapLease, Inc., American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc., and Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. are subject.
Note 20 17 Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 20172019 for the General Partner (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2017
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2017
Total revenues (1)
 $320,898
 $308,245
 $306,543
 $316,599
Income (loss) from continuing operations 11,935
 29,550
 12,489
 (2,479)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 2,855
 4,636
 4,005
 (30,613)
Net income (loss) 14,790
 34,186
 16,494
 (33,092)
Net income (loss) attributable to the General Partner 14,438
 33,408
 16,094
 (32,122)
Basic and diluted net loss (income) per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.01) $0.01
(3) 
$(0.01) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $0.00
 $0.01
(3) 
$0.00
 $(0.03)
Basic and dilutive net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.00) $0.02
(3) 
$(0.00) $(0.05)
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2019
 June 30,
2019
 September 30,
2019
 December 31,
2019
Rental revenue $316,843
 $312,043
 $302,985
 $305,363
Net income (loss) 70,971
 292,284
 (741,529) 71,168
Net income (loss) attributable to the General Partner 69,304
 285,658
 (726,440) 71,125
Basic and dilutive net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders (1)
 $0.05
 $0.27
 $(0.76) $0.05

(1)Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per share amounts. The Company calculates net income (loss) per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2019 for the OP (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2019
 June 30,
2019
 September 30,
2019
 December 31,
2019
Rental revenue $316,843
 $312,043
 $302,985
 $305,363
Net income (loss) 70,971
 292,284
 (741,529) 71,168
Net income (loss) attributable to the OP 70,999
 292,314
 (741,504) 71,187
Basic and dilutive net income (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders (1)
 $0.05
 $0.27
 $(0.76) $0.05

(3)(1)Represents dilutiveThe sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share attributableunit amounts may not agree to common stockholdersthe full year loss income per unit amounts. The Company calculates net income (loss) per unit based on the weighted-average number of outstanding units during the reporting period. The average number of units fluctuates throughout the year and limited partners.can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 20172018 for the OPGeneral Partner (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2017
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2017
Total revenues (1)
 $320,898
 $308,245
 $306,543
 $316,599
Income (loss) from continuing operations 11,935
 29,550
 12,489
 (2,479)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 2,855
 4,636
 4,005
 (30,613)
Net income (loss) 14,790
 34,186
 16,494
 (33,092)
Net income (loss) attributable to the OP 14,797
 34,200
 16,485
 (32,910)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.01) $0.01
 $(0.01) $(0.02)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $0.00
 $0.01
 $0.00
 $(0.03)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.00) $0.02
 $(0.00) $(0.05)
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2018
 June 30,
2018
 September 30,
2018
 December 31,
2018
Rental revenue (1)
 $315,074
 $315,664
 $313,866
 $313,263
Net income (loss) from continuing operations 29,036
 (74,691) (73,942) 27,872
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 3,501
 224
 
 (30)
Net income (loss) 32,537
 (74,467) (73,942) 27,842
Net income (loss) attributable to the General Partner 31,795
 (72,670) (72,117) 27,218
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $0.01
 $(0.09) $(0.09) $0.01
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $0.00
 $0.00
 $
 $(0.00)
Basic and dilutive net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders (2) $0.01
 $(0.09) $(0.09) $0.01

(1)Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts may not agree to the full year loss per share amounts. The Company calculates net income (loss) per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.

F-58

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019 – (Continued)

Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2018 for the OP (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2018
 June 30,
2018
 September 30,
2018
 December 31,
2018
Rental revenue (1)
 $315,074
 $315,664
 $313,866
 $313,263
Net income (loss) from continuing operations 29,036
 (74,691) (73,942) 27,872
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 3,501
 224
 
 (30)
Net income (loss) 32,537
 (74,467) (73,942) 27,842
Net income (loss) attributable to the OP 32,577
 (74,451) (73,885) 27,883
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $0.01
 $(0.09) $(0.09) $0.01
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $0.00
 $0.00
 $
 $(0.00)
Basic and dilutive net income (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $0.01
 $(0.09) $(0.09) $0.01

(1)Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per unit amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per unit amounts. The Company calculates net lossincome (loss) per unit based on the weighted-average number of outstanding units during the reporting period. The average number of units fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.

F-66

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the General Partner (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2016
 June 30,
2016
 September 30,
2016
 December 31,
2016
Total revenues (1)
 $337,787
 $338,533
 $331,846
 $327,281
(Loss) income from continuing operations (116,701) 246
 28,865
 10,703
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 621
 2,987
 1,381
 (128,926)
Net (loss) income (116,080) 3,233
 30,246
 (118,223)
Net (loss) income attributable to the General Partner (113,086) 3,146
 29,495
 (115,418)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.15) $(0.02) $0.01
(3) 
$(0.01)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $0.00
 $0.00
 $0.00
(3) 
$(0.13)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders (2)
 $(0.15) $(0.02) $0.01
(3) 
$(0.14)

(1)Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per share amounts. The Company calculates net loss per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
(3)Represents dilutive net income per share attributable to common stockholders and limited partners.
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the OP (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
  Quarters Ended
  March 31,
2016
 June 30,
2016
 September 30,
2016
 December 31,
2016
Total revenues (1)
 $337,787
 $338,533
 $331,846
 $327,281
(Loss) income from continuing operations (116,701) 246
 28,865
 10,703
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 621
 2,987
 1,381
 (128,926)
Net (loss) income (116,080) 3,233
 30,246
 (118,223)
Net (loss) income attributable to the OP (116,041) 3,229
 30,234
 (118,232)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.15) $(0.02) $0.01
 $(0.01)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $0.00
 $0.00
 $0.00
 $(0.13)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per unit attributable to common unitholders (2)
 $(0.15) $(0.02) $0.01
 $(0.14)

(1)Represents revenue from continuing operations as presented on the statement of operations in accordance with GAAP. Substantially all of Cole Capital is presented as a discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining financial results are reported as a single segment for all periods presented.
(2)The sum of the quarterly net loss per unit amounts may not agree to the full year net loss per unit amounts. The Company calculates net loss per unit based on the weighted-average number of outstanding units during the reporting period. The average number of units fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.

F-67

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. and VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 (Continued)

Note 2118 – Subsequent Events
The following events occurred subsequent to December 31, 2017:2019:
Cole Sale
The Company closed on the Cole Capital Purchase and Sale Agreement on February 1, 2018. At closing, the Operating Partnership and Cole Capital entered into the Services Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will continue to provide certain services to Cole Capital and its subsidiaries and to the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support. The Company will continue to provide such services through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by Cole Capital.
Real Estate Investment Activity
From January 1, 20182020 through February 20, 2018,12, 2020 the Company disposed of seven13 properties, including the sale of 2 consolidated office properties to a newly-formed joint venture in which the Company owns a 20% equity interest (the “Office Partnership”), for an aggregate gross sales price of $57.8$118.1 million, of which the Company’s share was $57.44 properties were held for sale with an aggregate carrying value of $14.2 million andas of December 31, 2019, for an estimated gain of $8.5$20.8 million. In addition,
From January 1, 2020 through February 12, 2020 the Company also acquired six23 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $66.3$127.8 million, excluding capitalized external acquisition-related expenses.
Office Partnership
From January 1, 2020 through February 12, 2020, the Office Partnership acquired 1 property from a third party for a purchase price of $33.1 million.
Common Stock Dividend
On February 21, 2018,25, 2020, the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1375 per share of common stockCommon Stock (equaling an annualized dividend rate of $0.55 per share) for the first quarter of 20182020 to stockholders of record as of March 30, 2018,31, 2020, which will be paid on April 16, 2018.15, 2020. An equivalent distribution by the Operating Partnership is applicable per OP unit.Unit.
Preferred Stock Dividend
On February 21, 2018,25, 2020, the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors declared a monthly cash dividend to holders of the Series F Preferred Stock for April 20182020 through June 20182020 with respect to the periods included in the table below. The corresponding record and payment dates for each month's Series F Preferred Stock dividend are also shown in the table below. The dividend for the Series F Preferred Stock accrues daily on a 360-day annual basis equal to an annualized dividend rate of $1.675 per share, or $0.1395833 per 30-day month.
Period Record Date Payment Date
March 15, 20182020 - April 14, 20182020 April 1, 20182020 April 16, 201815, 2020
April 15, 20182020 - May 14, 20182020 May 1, 20182020 May 15, 20182020
May 15, 20182020 - June 14, 20182020 June 1, 20182020 June 15, 20182020



F-68F-59

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. AND VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 20172019 (in thousands)




Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Description Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Deductions Balance at End of Year  Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Deductions 
Balance at
End of Year
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017 
Reserve for program development costs (1)
 $31,652
 $9,328
 $(33,348)
(2 
) 
$7,632
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2019 
Allowance for doubtful accounts $6,309
 $
 $(6,309)
(1) 
$
 
Total $6,309

$

$(6,309)
$
 
Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2018 
Reserve for program development costs (2)
 $7,632
 $651
(3) 
$(8,283) $
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and other reserves 7,576
 6,956
 (1,849) 12,683
(4 
) 
 12,683
(4) 
2,531
 (8,905) 6,309
 
Unsecured note reserve 15,300
 
 
 15,300
  15,300
 
 (15,300) 
 
Total $54,528
 $16,284
 $(35,197) $35,615
  $35,615
 $3,182
 $(32,488) $6,309
 
         
Year Ended December 31, 2016 
Reserve for program development costs (1)
 $34,798
 $26,191
 $(29,337)
(3 
) 
$31,652
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017Year Ended December 31, 2017 
Reserve for program development costs (2)
 $31,652
 $9,328
 $(33,348)
(5) 
$7,632
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and other reserves 6,595
 2,318
 (1,337) 7,576
  7,576
 6,956
 (1,849) 12,683
(4) 
Unsecured note reserve 15,300
 
 
 15,300
  15,300
 
 
 15,300
 
Total $56,693
 $28,509
 $(30,674) $54,528
  $54,528
 $16,284
 $(35,197) $35,615
 
         
Year Ended December 31, 2015 
Reserve for program development costs (1)
 $13,109
 $21,689
 $
 $34,798
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and other reserves 2,475
 4,564
 (444) 6,595
 
Unsecured note reserve 
 15,300
 
 15,300
 
Total $15,584
 $41,553
 $(444) $56,693
 

(1)Upon adoption of ASC 842, the Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental revenue and does not record an allowance for uncollectable accounts.
(2)Classified as discontinued operations.
(2)(3)
Represents additions to the reserve during the period from January 1, 2018 through January 31, 2018, prior to the sale of Cole Capital.
(4)Includes $1.0 million classified as discontinued operations.
(5)Deductions related to the return of the Company's interest in two funds not yet in offering ($($1.3 million)million) and the closing of CCPT V's primary offering ($($32.0 million)million).
(3)Deductions related to the closing of CCIT II’s primary offering.
(4)
Includes $1.0 million classified as discontinued operations.



F- 69F-60

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. AND VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 20172019 (in thousands)


Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
24 Hour Fitness Woodlands TX $
 $2,690
 $7,463
 $194
 $10,347
 $(2,251) 9/24/2013 2002
7-Eleven Sarasota FL 
 1,312
 1,312
 
 2,624
 (373) 11/19/2012 2000
7-Eleven Gloucester VA 
 144
 578
 
 722
 (163) 12/24/2012 1985
7-Eleven Hampton VA 
 69
 624
 
 693
 (176) 12/24/2012 1986
7-Eleven Hampton VA 
 161
 644
 
 805
 (182) 12/24/2012 1959
AAA Oklahoma City OK 
 3,639
 32,567
 
 36,206
 (6,388) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Oneonta AL 614
 205
 1,080
 
 1,285
 (234) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Oxford AL 
 278
 748
 
 1,026
 (150) 2/7/2014 1989
Aaron Rents Valley AL 409
 141
 827
 
 968
 (169) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents El Dorado AR 
 238
 743
 
 981
 (168) 2/7/2014 2000
Aaron Rents Springdale AR 624
 513
 916
 
 1,429
 (205) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Auburndale FL 2,647
 1,351
 5,127
 
 6,478
 (1,091) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Pensacola FL 
 159
 924
 
 1,083
 (189) 2/7/2014 1979
Aaron Rents Statesboro GA 
 351
 1,163
 
 1,514
 (244) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Indianapolis IN 
 235
 1,071
 
 1,306
 (215) 2/7/2014 1998
Aaron Rents Lafayette IN 550
 404
 652
 
 1,056
 (161) 2/7/2014 1989
Aaron Rents Mansura LA 
 81
 497
 
 578
 (116) 2/7/2014 2000
Aaron Rents Minden LA 
 323
 1,043
 
 1,366
 (255) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Battle Creek MI 
 286
 843
 
 1,129
 (176) 2/7/2014 1995
Aaron Rents Benton Harbor MI 
 217
 924
 
 1,141
 (195) 2/7/2014 1997
Aaron Rents Redford MI 434
 125
 698
 
 823
 (166) 2/7/2014 1972
Aaron Rents Kennett MO 319
 203
 473
 
 676
 (108) 2/7/2014 1999
Aaron Rents Greenwood MS 
 156
 967
 
 1,123
 (212) 2/19/2014 2006
Aaron Rents Magnolia MS 1,473
 287
 2,791
 
 3,078
 (546) 2/7/2014 2000
Aaron Rents Charlotte NC 579
 308
 1,201
 
 1,509
 (237) 2/7/2014 1994
Aaron Rents Bowling Green OH 564
 326
 928
 
 1,254
 (208) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Kent OH 614
 245
 1,080
 
 1,325
 (247) 2/7/2014 1999
Aaron Rents North Olmsted OH 449
 218
 753
 
 971
 (178) 2/7/2014 1960
Aaron Rents Shawnee OK 
 303
 1,135
 
 1,438
 (247) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Bloomsburg PA 400
 224
 856
 
 1,080
 (174) 2/7/2014 1996
Aaron Rents Meadville PA 
 237
 1,224
 
 1,461
 (259) 2/7/2014 1994
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Other N/A N/A $
 $
 $13,345
 $7
 $13,352
 $(4,367) N/A  N/A
Home Depot Columbia SC 
 2,911
 15,463
 
 18,374
 (5,644) 11/9/2009  2009
Citizens Bank Higganum CT 
 171
 971
 
 1,142
 (379) 8/1/2010  1995
Vacant New London CT 
 94
 534
 (498) 130
 (3) 8/1/2010  1972
US Bank Wilmington IL 
 330
 1,872
 
 2,202
 (694) 8/1/2010  1966
US Bank Chicago IL 
 267
 1,511
 
 1,778
 (590) 8/1/2010  1923
US Bank Chicago IL 
 191
 1,082
 
 1,273
 (422) 8/1/2010  1979
US Bank Lyons IL 
 214
 1,212
 
 1,426
 (473) 8/1/2010  1959
US Bank Elmwood Park IL 
 431
 2,441
 
 2,872
 (918) 8/1/2010  1984
US Bank Alsip IL 
 226
 1,280
 
 1,506
 (499) 8/1/2010  1981
US Bank Evergreen Park IL 
 167
 944
 
 1,111
 (369) 8/1/2010  1984
Citizens Bank Clinton Township MI 
 574
 3,250
 
 3,824
 (1,274) 8/1/2010  1970
Vacant Southfield MI 
 283
 1,605
 (1,620) 268
 (1) 8/1/2010  1975
Citizens Bank Richmond MI 
 168
 951
 
 1,119
 (375) 8/1/2010  1980
Citizens Bank St. Clair Shores MI 
 309
 1,748
 
 2,057
 (689) 8/1/2010  1960
Citizens Bank Warren MI 
 178
 1,009
 
 1,187
 (394) 8/1/2010  1963
Citizens Bank Dearborn MI 
 434
 2,461
 
 2,895
 (913) 8/1/2010  1977
Citizens Bank Dearborn MI 
 385
 2,184
 
 2,569
 (810) 8/1/2010  1974
Citizens Bank Livonia MI 
 261
 1,476
 
 1,737
 (581) 8/1/2010  1959
Vacant Harper Woods MI 
 207
 1,171
 (1,228) 150
 
 8/1/2010  1982
Citizens Bank Grosse Pointe MI 
 410
 2,322
 
 2,732
 (898) 8/1/2010  1975
Citizens Bank Pittsfield NH 
 160
 908
 
 1,068
 (354) 8/1/2010  1976
Citizens Bank Rollinsford NH 
 78
 444
 
 522
 (173) 8/1/2010  1977
Citizens Bank Albany NY 
 232
 1,315
 
 1,547
 (488) 8/1/2010  1960
Citizens Bank Johnstown NY 
 163
 923
 
 1,086
 (342) 8/1/2010  1973
Citizens Bank Vails Gate NY 
 284
 1,610
 
 1,894
 (597) 8/1/2010  1967
United Health Services Greene NY 
 216
 1,227
 (1,193) 250
 (6) 8/1/2010  1981
Citizens Bank Whitesboro NY 
 130
 739
 
 869
 (274) 8/1/2010  1995
Citizens Bank Amherst NY 
 238
 1,348
 
 1,586
 (507) 8/1/2010  1965
Citizens Bank East Aurora NY 
 162
 919
 
 1,081
 (346) 8/1/2010  1996
Citizens Bank Rochester NY 
 166
 943
 
 1,109
 (355) 8/1/2010  1962

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Aaron Rents Columbia SC 
 576
 1,010
 
 1,586
 (206) 2/7/2014 1977
Aaron Rents Marion SC 319
 100
 685
 
 785
 (141) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Chattanooga TN 
 480
 1,075
 
 1,555
 (201) 2/7/2014 1989
Aaron Rents Copperas Cove TX 
 423
 1,341
 
 1,764
 (276) 2/7/2014 2007
Aaron Rents Haltom City TX 
 858
 1,024
 
 1,882
 (232) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Humble TX 
 548
 1,146
 
 1,694
 (241) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Killeen TX 
 815
 3,244
 
 4,059
 (667) 2/7/2014 1981
Aaron Rents Kingsville TX 599
 345
 1,040
 
 1,385
 (215) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Livingston TX 
 173
 1,498
 
 1,671
 (308) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Mexia TX 
 126
 1,186
 
 1,312
 (246) 2/7/2014 2007
Aaron Rents Mission TX 549
 324
 954
 
 1,278
 (196) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Odessa TX 
 99
 768
 
 867
 (163) 2/7/2014 2006
Aaron Rents Pasadena TX 
 444
 1,231
 
 1,675
 (258) 2/7/2014 2009
Aaron Rents Port Lavaca TX 
 160
 1,274
 
 1,434
 (265) 2/7/2014 2007
Aaron Rents Texas City TX 
 275
 2,156
 
 2,431
 (442) 2/7/2014 2008
Aaron Rents Richmond VA 
 508
 1,435
 
 1,943
 (336) 2/7/2014 1988
Abbott Laboratories Waukegan IL 
 4,734
 21,319
 601
 26,654
 (4,771) 11/5/2013 1980
Abuelo's Rogers AR 
 825
 2,296
 
 3,121
 (598) 6/27/2013 2003
Academy Sports Mobile AL 
 1,311
 7,431
 
 8,742
 (1,474) 11/1/2013 2012
Academy Sports Montgomery AL 
 1,869
 6,385
 
 8,254
 (1,432) 2/7/2014 2009
Academy Sports Fayetteville AR 7,290
 1,900
 7,601
 
 9,501
 (2,678) 12/28/2012 2012
Academy Sports Dalton GA 4,965
 998
 5,656
 
 6,654
 (1,937) 2/20/2013 2012
Academy Sports Bossier City LA 
 2,906
 6,555
 
 9,461
 (1,353) 2/7/2014 2008
Academy Sports Johnson City TN 
 1,902
 6,440
 
 8,342
 (203) 12/19/2016 2015
Academy Sports Smyrna TN 
 2,109
 8,434
 
 10,543
 (1,673) 11/1/2013 2012
Academy Sports Austin TX 5,044
 4,216
 8,755
 
 12,971
 (1,538) 2/7/2014 1988
Academy Sports Fort Worth TX 
 2,072
 8,329
 
 10,401
 (1,481) 2/7/2014 2009
Academy Sports Killeen TX 3,212
 2,779
 5,321
 
 8,100
 (1,007) 2/7/2014 2009
Academy Sports Laredo TX 
 2,782
 8,111
 
 10,893
 (1,497) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Birmingham AL 
 455
 373
 6
 834
 (102) 2/28/2013 1997
Advance Auto Parts Birmingham AL 
 330
 494
 
 824
 (135) 2/28/2013 1999
Advance Auto Parts Calera AL 
 723
 723
 
 1,446
 (204) 12/27/2012 2008
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Port Jervis NY 
 143
 811
 
 954
 (309) 8/1/2010  1995
Vacant Mentor OH 
 178
 1,011
 (689) 500
 (6) 8/1/2010  1976
Citizens Bank Northfield OH 
 317
 1,797
 
 2,114
 (701) 8/1/2010  1969
Citizens Bank Willoughby OH 
 395
 2,239
 (1,565) 1,069
 (34) 8/1/2010  1920
Citizens Bank Cleveland OH 
 239
 1,357
 
 1,596
 (537) 8/1/2010  1973
Citizens Bank Cleveland OH 
 210
 1,190
 
 1,400
 (471) 8/1/2010  1950
Citizens Bank Cleveland OH 
 182
 1,031
 
 1,213
 (408) 8/1/2010  1930
Citizens Bank Lakewood OH 
 196
 1,111
 
 1,307
 (412) 8/1/2010  1985
Citizens Bank Rocky River OH 
 283
 1,602
 
 1,885
 (594) 8/1/2010  1972
Citizens Bank Broadview Heights OH 
 201
 1,140
 
 1,341
 (435) 8/1/2010  1982
Citizens Bank Boardman OH 
 280
 1,589
 
 1,869
 (629) 8/1/2010  1984
Citizens Bank Brunswick OH 
 186
 1,057
 
 1,243
 (418) 8/1/2010  2004
Citizens Bank Wadsworth OH 
 158
 893
 
 1,051
 (353) 8/1/2010  1960
Citizens Bank Alliance OH 
 204
 1,156
 
 1,360
 (457) 8/1/2010  1972
Citizens Bank Louisville OH 
 191
 1,080
 
 1,271
 (427) 8/1/2010  1960
Citizens Bank Massillon OH 
 287
 1,624
 
 1,911
 (642) 8/1/2010  1978
Vacant Massillon OH 
 212
 1,202
 (1,269) 145
 (1) 8/1/2010  1958
Citizens Bank Narberth PA 
 420
 2,381
 
 2,801
 (883) 8/1/2010  1935
Citizens Bank St. Albans VT 
 141
 798
 
 939
 (304) 8/1/2010  1989
Community Bank Whitehall NY 
 106
 600
 
 706
 (222) 8/1/2011  1995
FedEx Butte MT 
 403
 7,653
 6,126
 14,182
 (3,603) 9/27/2011  2001
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 800
 343
 1,029
 
 1,372
 (384) 9/30/2011  2006
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 800
 248
 991
 
 1,239
 (370) 9/30/2011  2006
Walgreens Staten Island NY 
 
 3,984
 
 3,984
 (1,579) 10/5/2011  2007
Walgreens Coalinga CA 2,800
 396
 3,568
 
 3,964
 (1,414) 10/11/2011  2008
Dollar General Red Level AL 300
 120
 680
 
 800
 (252) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Molino FL 400
 178
 1,007
 
 1,185
 (374) 10/31/2011  2011
Dollar General Maysville MO 300
 107
 607
 
 714
 (225) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Forest OH 300
 76
 681
 
 757
 (253) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General New Matamoras OH 300
 123
 696
 
 819
 (258) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Payne OH 300
 81
 729
 
 810
 (271) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Pleasant City OH 300
 131
 740
 
 871
 (275) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Poteet TX 400
 96
 864
 
 960
 (321) 10/31/2011  2010



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Progreso TX 400
 169
 957
 
 1,126
 (355) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Rio Grande City TX 300
 137
 779
 
 916
 (289) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Roma TX 500
 253
 1,010
 
 1,263
 (375) 10/31/2011  2010
Dollar General Bella Vista AR 
 129
 302
 35
 466
 (114) 11/10/2011  2005
Dollar General Carlisle AR 
 13
 245
 (2) 256
 (90) 11/10/2011  2005
Dollar General Green Forest AR 
 52
 303
 38
 393
 (115) 11/10/2011  2005
Dollar General Jonesboro IL 
 77
 309
 
 386
 (114) 11/10/2011  2007
Dollar General Appleton City MO 
 22
 124
 
 146
 (46) 11/10/2011  2004
Dollar General Ash Grove MO 
 35
 315
 28
 378
 (116) 11/10/2011  2006
Dollar General Ashland MO 
 70
 398
 135
 603
 (159) 11/10/2011  2006
Dollar General Bernie MO 
 35
 314
 
 349
 (116) 11/10/2011  2007
Dollar General Bloomfield MO 
 23
 215
 38
 276
 (78) 11/10/2011  2005
Dollar General Carterville MO 
 10
 192
 
 202
 (71) 11/10/2011  2004
Dollar General Clarkton MO 
 19
 354
 
 373
 (131) 11/10/2011  2007
Dollar General Diamond MO 
 44
 175
 
 219
 (65) 11/10/2011  2005
Dollar General Ellsinore MO 
 30
 579
 91
 700
 (214) 11/10/2011  2010
Dollar General Hallsville MO 
 29
 263
 32
 324
 (96) 11/10/2011  2004
Dollar General Lawson MO 
 29
 162
 6
 197
 (60) 11/10/2011  2003
Dollar General Lilbourn MO 
 62
 554
 
 616
 (204) 11/10/2011  2010
Dollar General Qulin MO 
 30
 573
 68
 671
 (210) 11/10/2011  2009
Dollar General Steele MO 
 31
 598
 
 629
 (221) 11/10/2011  2009
Dollar General Strafford MO 
 51
 471
 44
 566
 (172) 11/10/2011  2009
Dollar General Commerce OK 
 38
 341
 (6) 373
 (125) 11/10/2011  2006
Walgreens Maplewood NJ 4,700
 1,071
 6,071
 
 7,142
 (2,390) 11/18/2011  2011
Dollar General Auxvasse MO 300
 72
 650
 
 722
 (240) 11/22/2011  2011
Dollar General Conway MO 300
 37
 694
 
 731
 (256) 11/22/2011  2011
Dollar General King City MO 300
 33
 625
 
 658
 (231) 11/22/2011  2010
Dollar General Licking MO 300
 76
 688
 
 764
 (254) 11/22/2011  2010
Dollar General Stanberry MO 300
 111
 629
 
 740
 (232) 11/22/2011  2010
Advance Auto Parts Caro MI 
 117
 665
 (9) 773
 (243) 11/23/2011  2002
Advance Auto Parts Charlotte MI 
 123
 697
 92
 912
 (262) 11/23/2011  2002
Advance Auto Parts Flint MI 
 133
 534
 92
 759
 (198) 11/23/2011  2002
Advance Auto Parts Sault Ste. Marie MI 
 75
 671
 80
 826
 (264) 11/23/2011  2003



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Stevensville MI 3,099
 855
 3,420
 
 4,275
 (1,347) 11/28/2011  2007
Dollar General Tarrant AL 
 217
 869
 
 1,086
 (318) 12/12/2011  2011
Advance Auto Parts Livonia MI 
 210
 643
 49
 902
 (241) 12/12/2011  2003
General Service Administration Cocoa FL 500
 253
 1,435
 15
 1,703
 (552) 12/13/2011  2009
Dollar General Monroeville IN 
 112
 636
 
 748
 (233) 12/22/2011  2011
FedEx Belmont NH 
 265
 2,386
 
 2,651
 (996) 12/29/2011  1991
Walgreens Myrtle Beach SC 
 
 2,077
 
 2,077
 (813) 12/29/2011  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Madison NE 
 37
 703
 
 740
 (258) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Floydada TX 
 36
 681
 
 717
 (250) 12/30/2011  2010
Dollar General Tuscaloosa AL 300
 133
 756
 
 889
 (277) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Grand Ridge FL 300
 76
 684
 
 760
 (251) 12/30/2011  2010
Dollar General St. Clair MO 400
 220
 879
 
 1,099
 (322) 12/30/2011  1995
Dollar General Pleasant Hill TN 300
 39
 747
 
 786
 (274) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Lyford TX 300
 80
 724
 
 804
 (265) 12/30/2011  2010
Dollar General Mellen WI 300
 79
 711
 
 790
 (261) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Minong WI 300
 38
 727
 
 765
 (266) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Solon Springs WI 300
 76
 685
 
 761
 (251) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Edwards MS 300
 75
 671
 
 746
 (246) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Greenville MS 300
 82
 739
 
 821
 (271) 12/30/2011  2011
Dollar General Walnut Grove MS 300
 71
 641
 
 712
 (235) 12/30/2011  2011
General Service Administration Craig CO 
 129
 1,159
 16
 1,304
 (445) 12/30/2011  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Stilwell OK 
 40
 768
 
 808
 (280) 1/6/2012  2011
General Service Administration Freeport NY 
 843
 3,372
 
 4,215
 (1,276) 1/10/2012  1995
Walgreens Eastpointe MI 
 668
 2,672
 
 3,340
 (1,039) 1/19/2012  1998
Express Scripts Berkeley MO 
 5,706
 32,333
 
 38,039
 (12,526) 1/25/2012  2011
Tractor Supply Allentown NJ 
 697
 3,949
 
 4,646
 (1,334) 1/27/2012  2008
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Yates ND 
 126
 715
 
 841
 (260) 1/31/2012  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar New Town ND 
 105
 942
 23
 1,070
 (345) 1/31/2012  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Rolla ND 
 83
 749
 
 832
 (273) 1/31/2012  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Martin SD 
 85
 764
 
 849
 (278) 1/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Hampton IA 
 188
 751
 
 939
 (272) 2/1/2012  2012
Dollar General Lake Mills IA 
 81
 728
 
 809
 (263) 2/1/2012  2012
Dollar General Marthasville MO 300
 41
 782
 
 823
 (283) 2/1/2012  2011



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Rio Grande City TX 
 163
 652
 
 815
 (236) 2/1/2012  2011
FedEx Blountville TN 
 562
 5,056
 
 5,618
 (2,080) 2/3/2012  2009
Dollar General Choudrant LA 300
 83
 745
 
 828
 (270) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Mangham LA 300
 40
 759
 
 799
 (275) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Mount Hermon LA 400
 94
 842
 
 936
 (305) 2/6/2012  2009
Dollar General Monroe LA 400
 97
 869
 
 966
 (314) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Fayetteville NC 300
 216
 647
 
 863
 (234) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Ocean Isle Beach NC 400
 341
 633
 
 974
 (229) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Vass NC 300
 226
 528
 
 754
 (191) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Richmond VA 400
 242
 726
 
 968
 (263) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Danville VA 300
 155
 621
 
 776
 (225) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Hopewell VA 500
 584
 713
 
 1,297
 (258) 2/6/2012  2011
Dollar General Hot Springs VA 400
 283
 661
 
 944
 (239) 2/6/2012  2011
Walgreens Anderson SC 
 835
 3,342
 
 4,177
 (1,291) 2/8/2012  2006
Walgreens Wetumpka AL 
 547
 3,102
 
 3,649
 (1,198) 2/22/2012  2007
Walgreens Shereveport LA 
 619
 3,509
 
 4,128
 (1,355) 2/22/2012  2003
Walgreens Bryan OH 
 219
 4,154
 
 4,373
 (1,605) 2/22/2012  2007
FedEx Greenville NC 
 363
 6,903
 
 7,266
 (2,840) 2/22/2012  2006
FedEx Tulsa OK 
 458
 8,695
 
 9,153
 (3,577) 2/22/2012  2008
Dollar General Greenfield OH 400
 110
 986
 
 1,096
 (357) 2/23/2012  2011
Dollar General Sikeston MO 
 56
 1,056
 
 1,112
 (382) 2/24/2012  2011
Dollar General Vienna MO 
 78
 704
 
 782
 (255) 2/24/2012  2011
Dollar General Lake Charles LA 
 102
 919
 
 1,021
 (332) 2/29/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kerens TX 
 73
 658
 
 731
 (238) 2/29/2012  2011
General Service Administration Grangeville ID 2,100
 317
 6,023
 27
 6,367
 (2,248) 3/5/2012  2007
Dollar General Gardner LA 
 138
 784
 
 922
 (282) 3/8/2012  2012
Dollar General West Monroe LA 
 153
 869
 
 1,022
 (312) 3/9/2012  1995
Dollar General Altamont IL 
 211
 844
 
 1,055
 (304) 3/9/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Greenwood SC 
 210
 630
 
 840
 (227) 3/9/2012  1995
Dollar General Cadillac MI 
 187
 747
 
 934
 (268) 3/16/2012  2012
Dollar General Carleton MI 
 222
 666
 
 888
 (239) 3/16/2012  2011
FedEx Kokomo IN 
 186
 3,541
 3,442
 7,169
 (1,895) 3/16/2012  2012
FedEx Commerce City CO 
 6,556
 26,224
 393
 33,173
 (10,758) 3/20/2012  2007



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Franklin IN 
 310
 2,787
 (6) 3,091
 (1,070) 3/29/2012  1999
Advance Auto Parts Auburn IN 
 337
 1,347
 
 1,684
 (484) 3/29/2012  2007
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Biloxi MS 
 310
 575
 
 885
 (207) 3/30/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Carriere MS 
 200
 599
 
 799
 (215) 3/30/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tickfaw LA 
 181
 543
 
 724
 (195) 3/30/2012  2011
Dollar General Oran MO 
 83
 747
 
 830
 (269) 3/30/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St Louis MO 
 168
 671
 (4) 835
 (238) 4/2/2012  2006
FedEx Blauvelt NY 26,100
 14,420
 26,779
 
 41,199
 (10,851) 4/5/2012  2012
Dollar General Soso MS 
 116
 658
 
 774
 (235) 4/12/2012  2011
Advance Auto Parts Warren OH 
 83
 745
 (2) 826
 (265) 4/12/2012  2003
Dollar General Como TX 
 76
 683
 
 759
 (244) 4/20/2012  2012
Dollar General Gordonville TX 
 38
 717
 
 755
 (256) 4/20/2012  2012
Rubbermaid Winfield KS 
 1,056
 20,060
 
 21,116
 (8,128) 4/25/2012  2008
Dollar General Chunchula AL 
 174
 697
 
 871
 (249) 4/26/2012  2012
Dollar General Moulton AL 
 517
 1,207
 
 1,724
 (431) 4/26/2012  2012
Dollar General Nancy KY 
 81
 733
 
 814
 (262) 4/26/2012  2011
Dollar General New Iberia LA 
 315
 736
 
 1,051
 (263) 4/26/2012  2011
Dollar General Patterson LA 
 259
 1,035
 
 1,294
 (370) 4/26/2012  2011
Dollar General Zachary LA 
 248
 743
 
 991
 (265) 4/26/2012  2011
Citizens Bank Wilmington DE 
 299
 299
 
 598
 (102) 4/26/2012  1967
Citizens Bank Pelham NH 
 113
 340
 
 453
 (116) 4/26/2012  1983
Dollar General New Haven MO 
 176
 702
 
 878
 (251) 4/27/2012  2012
Dollar General Ozark MO 
 190
 758
 
 948
 (271) 4/27/2012  2012
Dollar General LittleRiver Acdmy TX 
 122
 693
 
 815
 (248) 4/27/2012  2012
Tire Kingdom Dublin OH 
 373
 1,119
 
 1,492
 (434) 4/30/2012  2003
Dollar General Moorhead MS 
 107
 606
 
 713
 (215) 5/1/2012  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Chalmette LA 
 751
 615
 
 1,366
 (218) 5/3/2012  2011
Circle K Phoenix AZ 
 344
 1,377
 
 1,721
 (489) 5/4/2012  1986
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Rangely CO 
 66
 593
 
 659
 (210) 5/4/2012  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lovelock NV 
 185
 742
 
 927
 (263) 5/4/2012  2012
Dollar General Burkeville VA 
 160
 906
 
 1,066
 (321) 5/8/2012  2012
General Service Administration Fort Worth TX 
 477
 4,294
 (4) 4,767
 (1,574) 5/9/2012  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Wells NV 
 84
 755
 
 839
 (268) 5/11/2012  2011



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Lucasville OH 
 223
 893
 
 1,116
 (317) 5/16/2012  2012
Dollar General Durand MI 
 181
 726
 
 907
 (257) 5/18/2012  2012
Dollar General Flint MI 
 83
 743
 
 826
 (264) 5/18/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 209
 626
 
 835
 (222) 5/21/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar D'Iberville MS 
 241
 561
 
 802
 (199) 5/21/2012  2012
General Mills Geneva IL 
 7,457
 22,371
 
 29,828
 (8,996) 5/23/2012  1998
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Caldwell TX 
 138
 552
 387
 1,077
 (205) 5/29/2012  2012
Walgreens Las Vegas NV 6,566
 1,528
 6,114
 
 7,642
 (2,316) 5/30/2012  2009
FedEx Evansville IN 
 665
 2,661
 7
 3,333
 (1,070) 5/31/2012  1998
FedEx Kankakee IL 
 195
 1,103
 176
 1,474
 (484) 5/31/2012  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hawthorne NV 
 191
 764
 
 955
 (269) 6/1/2012  2012
Big O Tires Los Lunas NM 
 316
 1,265
 
 1,581
 (483) 6/1/2012  2006
NTW Morrow GA 
 397
 1,586
 
 1,983
 (605) 6/5/2012  1992
Fresenius Medical Care Caro MI 
 92
 1,744
 
 1,836
 (538) 6/5/2012  1995
Fresenius Medical Care Jackson MI 1,948
 137
 2,603
 
 2,740
 (804) 6/5/2012  1995
Fresenius Medical Care Kings Mills OH 
 399
 598
 6
 1,003
 (190) 6/5/2012  1995
Dollar General Birmingham AL 
 156
 882
 
 1,038
 (311) 6/6/2012  2012
Dollar General Pacific MO 
 151
 853
 
 1,004
 (301) 6/6/2012  2012
Dollar General Loudonville OH 
 236
 945
 
 1,181
 (333) 6/6/2012  2012
Dollar General Natchez MS 
 166
 664
 
 830
 (234) 6/12/2012  2012
Tractor Supply Negaunee MI 
 488
 1,953
 
 2,441
 (633) 6/12/2012  2010
Dollar General Springfield MO 
 378
 702
 
 1,080
 (248) 6/14/2012  2012
FedEx Bryan TX 
 1,422
 4,763
 33
 6,218
 (1,523) 6/15/2012  1995
General Service Administration Plattsburgh NY 
 508
 4,572
 
 5,080
 (1,664) 6/19/2012  2008
General Service Administration Mobile AL 
 268
 5,095
 49
 5,412
 (1,860) 6/19/2012  1995
Tractor Supply Rio Grande TX 
 469
 1,095
 
 1,564
 (355) 6/19/2012  1993
General Service Administration Warren PA 
 341
 3,114
 55
 3,510
 (1,144) 6/19/2012  2008
Dollar General Ash Flat AR 
 44
 132
 24
 200
 (48) 6/19/2012  1997
Dollar General Flippin AR 
 53
 64
 1
 118
 (22) 6/19/2012  1994
Dollar General Panama City FL 
 139
 312
 280
 731
 (58) 6/19/2012  1987
Dollar General Clever MO 
 136
 542
 
 678
 (191) 6/19/2012  2010
Dollar General Humansville MO 
 69
 277
 
 346
 (98) 6/19/2012  2007
Dollar General Oak Grove MO 
 27
 106
 64
 197
 (41) 6/19/2012  1999



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Palmyra MO 
 40
 225
 (3) 262
 (79) 6/19/2012  2003
Dollar General Senath MO 
 61
 552
 
 613
 (195) 6/19/2012  2010
Dollar General Seneca MO 
 47
 189
 180
 416
 (90) 6/19/2012  1962
Dollar General St. James MO 
 81
 244
 
 325
 (86) 6/19/2012  1999
Dollar General Willow Springs MO 
 24
 213
 48
 285
 (77) 6/19/2012  2002
Advance Auto Parts Woodbury NJ 
 446
 1,784
 
 2,230
 (629) 6/20/2012  2007
Advance Auto Parts Chapin SC 
 395
 922
 
 1,317
 (325) 6/20/2012  2007
General Service Administration Gloucester VA 
 287
 1,628
 8
 1,923
 (593) 6/20/2012  1995
Dollar General Melvindale MI 
 242
 967
 
 1,209
 (341) 6/26/2012  2012
Fresenius Medical Care Peru IN 
 69
 1,305
 
 1,374
 (403) 6/27/2012  1982
Walgreens Eaton OH 
 398
 3,586
 
 3,984
 (1,349) 6/27/2012  2008
Walgreens Easley SC 
 1,206
 3,617
 
 4,823
 (1,361) 6/27/2012  2007
Advance Auto Parts Chesterfield SC 
 131
 745
 
 876
 (262) 6/27/2012  2008
Dollar General Bergman AR 
 113
 639
 
 752
 (224) 7/2/2012  2011
Dollar General Hickory MS 
 77
 692
 
 769
 (242) 7/2/2012  2011
Dollar General Stonewall MS 
 116
 655
 
 771
 (229) 7/2/2012  2011
Dollar General Stringer MS 
 116
 655
 
 771
 (229) 7/2/2012  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Eagle Lake TX 
 100
 566
 100
 766
 (215) 7/6/2012  2012
Dollar General Silsbee TX 
 43
 810
 
 853
 (284) 7/6/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Pasadena TX 
 382
 1,146
 
 1,528
 (401) 7/6/2012  2008
Dollar General New Charlisle OH 
 215
 860
 
 1,075
 (301) 7/10/2012  2012
Dollar General Bangor MI 
 173
 691
 
 864
 (242) 7/10/2012  2012
Dollar General East Jordan MI 
 125
 709
 
 834
 (248) 7/10/2012  2012
Dollar General Gaylord MI 
 172
 687
 
 859
 (241) 7/10/2012  2012
FedEx Humboldt TN 
 239
 4,543
 
 4,782
 (1,799) 7/11/2012  2008
Dollar General Mcminnville TN 
 120
 679
 
 799
 (238) 7/12/2012  2012
Dollar General Jennings MO 
 445
 826
 
 1,271
 (289) 7/13/2012  2012
Fresenius Medical Care Aurora IL 2,294
 287
 2,584
 15
 2,886
 (796) 7/13/2012  1996
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mountainair NM 
 84
 752
 
 836
 (263) 7/16/2012  2011
Dollar General Rush City MN 
 126
 716
 
 842
 (250) 7/25/2012  2012
Dollar General Manchester TN 
 114
 646
 
 760
 (226) 7/26/2012  2012
Dollar General Keithville LA 
 83
 750
 
 833
 (263) 7/26/2012  2012
Bojangles Boone NC 
 278
 833
 
 1,111
 (355) 7/27/2012  1980



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bojangles Indian Trail NC 
 655
 1,217
 
 1,872
 (520) 7/27/2012  2011
Bojangles Morganton NC 
 566
 1,321
 
 1,887
 (564) 7/27/2012  2010
Bojangles Roanoke Rapids NC 
 442
 1,032
 
 1,474
 (440) 7/27/2012  2011
Bojangles Clinton SC 
 397
 926
 
 1,323
 (395) 7/27/2012  2009
Bojangles Winder GA 
 645
 1,198
 
 1,843
 (512) 7/30/2012  2011
Bojangles Dobson NC 
 251
 1,004
 
 1,255
 (429) 7/30/2012  2010
Bojangles Southport NC 
 505
 1,179
 
 1,684
 (503) 7/30/2012  2011
Scotts Miracle-Gro Orrville OH 
 611
 1,134
 
 1,745
 (449) 7/30/2012  1950
Scotts Miracle-Gro Orrville OH 
 609
 11,576
 
 12,185
 (4,584) 7/30/2012  2006
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tulsa OK 
 220
 878
 
 1,098
 (307) 7/30/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Okolona MS 
 64
 578
 
 642
 (202) 7/31/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Winona MS 
 146
 585
 
 731
 (205) 7/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Laredo TX 
 253
 758
 
 1,011
 (265) 7/31/2012  2012
Walgreens Lincoln Park MI 5,494
 1,041
 5,896
 
 6,937
 (2,204) 7/31/2012  2007
Walgreens Anderson IN 
 807
 3,227
 
 4,034
 (1,206) 7/31/2012  2001
West Marine Deltaville VA 
 425
 2,409
 
 2,834
 (843) 7/31/2012  2012
Fresenius Medical Care Chicago IL 
 588
 1,764
 
 2,352
 (540) 7/31/2012  1960
Fresenius Medical Care Waukegan IL 
 94
 1,792
 61
 1,947
 (565) 7/31/2012  1980
O'Reilly Auto Parts Oneonta AL 
 81
 460
 52
 593
 (162) 8/2/2012  2000
Dollar General Belton MO 
 105
 948
 
 1,053
 (330) 8/3/2012  2012
Tractor Supply Gray LA 2,048
 550
 2,202
 
 2,752
 (701) 8/7/2012  2011
CVS Freeland PA 
 122
 1,096
 
 1,218
 (407) 8/8/2012  2004
Dollar General Sarepta LA 
 131
 743
 
 874
 (259) 8/9/2012  2011
Dollar General Gardendale AL 
 142
 805
 
 947
 (280) 8/9/2012  2012
Dollar General Plattsburg MO 
 44
 843
 
 887
 (293) 8/9/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Granite Falls NC 
 251
 1,005
 
 1,256
 (350) 8/9/2012  2010
Advance Auto Parts Franklin OH 
 218
 873
 
 1,091
 (304) 8/9/2012  1984
Advance Auto Parts Oklahoma City OK 
 208
 1,178
 
 1,386
 (410) 8/9/2012  2007
Bojangles Chapin SC 
 577
 1,071
 
 1,648
 (454) 8/9/2012  2009
Williams Sonoma Olive Branch MS 
 2,330
 44,266
 
 46,596
 (17,392) 8/10/2012  2001
Dollar General Hickory NC 
 89
 804
 
 893
 (279) 8/13/2012  2012
Dollar General Tryon NC 
 139
 789
 
 928
 (274) 8/13/2012  2012
Bed Bath & Beyond Stockton CA 40,278
 2,761
 52,454
 
 55,215
 (20,609) 8/17/2012  2003



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 837
 685
 
 1,522
 (238) 8/21/2012  2007
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Horn Lake MS 
 225
 676
 
 901
 (235) 8/22/2012  2012
Dollar General Doyle TN 
 75
 679
 
 754
 (236) 8/22/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Inez KY 
 130
 1,174
 
 1,304
 (408) 8/22/2012  2010
Advance Auto Parts Lakewood NJ 
 750
 1,750
 
 2,500
 (609) 8/22/2012  2010
CVS North Las Vegas NV 3,268
 1,374
 3,207
 
 4,581
 (1,190) 8/22/2012  2004
Dollar General Cardwell MO 
 89
 805
 
 894
 (280) 8/24/2012  2012
Dollar General Hawk Point MO 
 177
 709
 
 886
 (246) 8/24/2012  2012
Dollar General Robertsville MO 
 131
 744
 
 875
 (259) 8/24/2012  2011
Dollar General Sikeston MO 
 144
 819
 
 963
 (285) 8/24/2012  2012
Circle K Martinez GA 
 348
 813
 
 1,161
 (283) 8/28/2012  2003
Dollar General Covert MI 
 37
 704
 
 741
 (245) 8/30/2012  2012
Dollar General Iron River MI 
 86
 777
 
 863
 (270) 8/30/2012  2012
Dollar General Negaunee MI 
 87
 779
 
 866
 (271) 8/30/2012  2012
Dollar General Roscommon MI 
 87
 781
 
 868
 (271) 8/30/2012  2012
Dollar General Chariton IA 
 165
 934
 
 1,099
 (325) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Jacksonville IL 
 145
 823
 
 968
 (286) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Gower MO 
 118
 668
 
 786
 (232) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Rocky Mount MO 
 88
 789
 
 877
 (275) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General New Braunfels TX 
 205
 818
 
 1,023
 (284) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Waco TX 
 192
 767
 
 959
 (267) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Auburn KS 
 42
 801
 
 843
 (278) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Cottonwood Falls KS 
 89
 802
 
 891
 (279) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Erie KS 
 42
 790
 
 832
 (275) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Garden City KS 
 136
 771
 
 907
 (268) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Harper KS 
 91
 818
 
 909
 (284) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Humboldt KS 
 44
 828
 
 872
 (288) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Kingman KS 
 142
 804
 
 946
 (280) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Medicine Lodge KS 
 40
 765
 
 805
 (266) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Minneapolis KS 
 43
 816
 
 859
 (284) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Pomona KS 
 42
 796
 
 838
 (277) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Sedan KS 
 42
 792
 
 834
 (275) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Syracuse KS 
 43
 817
 
 860
 (284) 8/31/2012  2010



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Calera OK 
 136
 770
 
 906
 (268) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Hartshorne OK 
 100
 898
 
 998
 (312) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Lexington OK 
 85
 761
 
 846
 (265) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Maud OK 
 76
 688
 
 764
 (239) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Maysville OK 
 41
 785
 
 826
 (273) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Rush Spring OK 
 87
 779
 
 866
 (271) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Bryan TX 
 185
 740
 
 925
 (257) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Gladewater TX 
 184
 736
 
 920
 (256) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General La Marque TX 
 102
 917
 
 1,019
 (319) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 267
 801
 
 1,068
 (278) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Mount Pleasant TX 
 214
 858
 
 1,072
 (298) 8/31/2012  2009
Dollar General Tyler TX 
 219
 875
 
 1,094
 (304) 8/31/2012  2010
Dollar General Carthage IL 
 48
 908
 
 956
 (316) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 372
 692
 
 1,064
 (241) 8/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Nashua IA 
 136
 768
 
 904
 (265) 9/6/2012  2012
Dollar General Farmington NM 
 269
 807
 
 1,076
 (279) 9/6/2012  2012
Dollar General Morehouse MO 
 87
 783
 
 870
 (270) 9/7/2012  2012
Dollar General Sedadia MO 
 273
 637
 
 910
 (220) 9/7/2012  2012
Dollar General Edinburg TX 
 136
 769
 
 905
 (266) 9/7/2012  2012
Dollar General Marble Hill MO 
 104
 935
 
 1,039
 (323) 9/11/2012  2012
Dollar General Donna TX 
 136
 768
 
 904
 (265) 9/11/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Warren OH 
 170
 681
 (2) 849
 (235) 9/11/2012  2012
Dollar General Troy TX 
 93
 841
 
 934
 (290) 9/12/2012  2012
Dollar General Edina MO 
 127
 722
 
 849
 (249) 9/13/2012  2012
Dollar General Belton TX 
 145
 821
 
 966
 (283) 9/13/2012  2012
Dollar General Meridian MS 
 178
 713
 
 891
 (246) 9/13/2012  2011
Dollar General Meridian MS 
 40
 754
 
 794
 (260) 9/13/2012  2011
Dollar General Bryan TX 
 148
 840
 
 988
 (290) 9/14/2012  2012
Dollar General Bryan TX 
 193
 772
 
 965
 (267) 9/14/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Arco ID 
 76
 684
 
 760
 (236) 9/18/2012  2012
FedEx Parkersburg WV 
 193
 3,671
 
 3,864
 (1,431) 9/20/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 270
 629
 
 899
 (217) 9/20/2012  2012
Dollar General Kansas CIty MO 
 313
 731
 
 1,044
 (253) 9/21/2012  2012



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Lexington IL 
 100
 899
 
 999
 (310) 9/21/2012  2012
Dollar General Lebanon MO 
 278
 835
 
 1,113
 (288) 9/21/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Silver Spring NV 
 202
 808
 
 1,010
 (279) 9/21/2012  2012
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 259
 1,036
 
 1,295
 (437) 9/21/2012  1964
Krystal Tuscaloosa AL 
 206
 1,165
 454
 1,825
 (311) 9/21/2012  1976
Krystal Jacksonville FL 
 574
 574
 
 1,148
 (242) 9/21/2012  1990
Krystal Orlando FL 
 372
 372
 125
 869
 (173) 9/21/2012  1994
Krystal Orlando FL 
 669
 446
 
 1,115
 (188) 9/21/2012  1995
Krystal Plant City FL 
 355
 533
 
 888
 (225) 9/21/2012  2012
Krystal St. Augustine FL 
 411
 411
 125
 947
 (190) 9/21/2012  2012
Krystal Albany GA 
 309
 721
 
 1,030
 (304) 9/21/2012  1962
Krystal Atlanta GA 
 166
 664
 
 830
 (280) 9/21/2012  1973
Krystal Augusta GA 
 365
 851
 
 1,216
 (359) 9/21/2012  1979
Krystal Columbus GA 
 622
 934
 
 1,556
 (394) 9/21/2012  1977
Krystal Decatur GA 
 94
 533
 
 627
 (225) 9/21/2012  1965
Krystal Macon GA 
 325
 759
 
 1,084
 (320) 9/21/2012  1962
Krystal Milledgeville GA 
 261
 609
 
 870
 (257) 9/21/2012  2011
Krystal Snellville GA 
 466
 466
 (602) 330
 
 9/21/2012  1981
Krystal Gulfport MS 
 215
 861
 (792) 284
 
 9/21/2012  2011
Krystal Pearl MS 
 426
 638
 
 1,064
 (269) 9/21/2012  1976
Krystal Chattanooga TN 
 336
 784
 
 1,120
 (331) 9/21/2012  2010
Krystal Knoxville TN 
 369
 246
 (375) 240
 
 9/21/2012  1970
Dollar General Marion IL 
 153
 867
 
 1,020
 (299) 9/24/2012  1995
Dollar General Lebanon MO 
 177
 708
 
 885
 (244) 9/24/2012  2012
Dollar General Ozark MO 
 149
 842
 
 991
 (291) 9/24/2012  2012
Dollar General Weslaco TX 
 215
 862
 
 1,077
 (298) 9/24/2012  2012
Dollar General San Leon TX 
 87
 786
 
 873
 (272) 9/25/2012  2012
Dollar General Kyle TX 
 132
 747
 
 879
 (258) 9/26/2012  2012
Dollar General Converse LA 
 84
 756
 
 840
 (261) 9/26/2012  2012
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 260
 606
 
 866
 (209) 9/26/2012  2012
Mattress Firm Nederland TX 
 311
 1,245
 140
 1,696
 (432) 9/26/2012  1997
Dollar General Jonesville LA 
 103
 929
 
 1,032
 (321) 9/27/2012  2012




        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Caruthersville MO 
 98
 878
 
 976
 (303) 9/27/2012  2012
Dollar General Jackson MS 
 198
 793
 
 991
 (274) 9/27/2012  2011
Price Rite Rochester NY 3,080
 569
 3,594
 
 4,163
 (1,365) 9/27/2012  1965
Circle K Akron OH 
 675
 1,254
 
 1,929
 (433) 9/27/2012  1996
FedEx Omak WA 
 252
 1,425
 
 1,677
 (556) 9/27/2012  2012
FedEx Wenatchee WA 
 266
 2,393
 
 2,659
 (933) 9/27/2012  2012
FedEx Hazard KY 
 215
 4,085
 
 4,300
 (1,592) 9/28/2012  2012
Scotts Miracle-Gro Orrville OH 
 278
 2,502
 
 2,780
 (975) 9/28/2012  1950
FedEx Quincy IL 
 371
 2,101
 3,011
 5,483
 (1,366) 9/28/2012  2012
Citizens Bank Colchester CT 
 185
 1,049
 
 1,234
 (347) 9/28/2012  2012
Citizens Bank Deep River CT 
 453
 1,812
 
 2,265
 (600) 9/28/2012  1851
Citizens Bank East Lyme CT 
 258
 1,032
 
 1,290
 (342) 9/28/2012  1972
Citizens Bank Montville CT 
 413
 2,342
 
 2,755
 (775) 9/28/2012  1984
Citizens Bank Stonington CT 
 190
 1,079
 
 1,269
 (357) 9/28/2012  1984
Citizens Bank Malden MA 1,697
 484
 1,935
 
 2,419
 (641) 9/28/2012  1988
Citizens Bank Medford MA 1,194
 589
 1,094
 
 1,683
 (362) 9/28/2012  1938
Citizens Bank Randolph MA 1,383
 480
 1,439
 
 1,919
 (477) 9/28/2012  1979
Citizens Bank Somerville MA 
 561
 561
 
 1,122
 (186) 9/28/2012  1940
Citizens Bank Dallas PA 
 213
 1,205
 
 1,418
 (399) 9/28/2012  1949
Citizens Bank Mechanicsburg PA 1,620
 288
 2,590
 
 2,878
 (858) 9/28/2012  1900
Citizens Bank Mount Lebanon PA 1,577
 215
 1,939
 
 2,154
 (642) 9/28/2012  1960
Citizens Bank West Hazleton PA 
 279
 2,509
 
 2,788
 (831) 9/28/2012  1900
Kum & Go Paragould AR 
 708
 2,123
 
 2,831
 (733) 9/28/2012  2012
Kum & Go Sherwood AR 
 866
 1,609
 
 2,475
 (556) 9/28/2012  2012
CVS Alpharetta GA 
 572
 858
 141
 1,571
 (315) 9/28/2012  1994
CVS Vidalia GA 
 368
 1,105
 76
 1,549
 (408) 9/28/2012  2000
CVS Nashville TN 
 203
 1,148
 82
 1,433
 (425) 9/28/2012  1996
Iron Mountain Columbus OH 
 405
 3,642
 1,264
 5,311
 (1,550) 9/28/2012  1954
Dollar General Buchanan Dam TX 
 145
 820
 
 965
 (283) 9/28/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Brookston IN 
 126
 715
 
 841
 (245) 10/1/2012  2012
Walgreens Memphis TN 
 896
 2,687
 
 3,583
 (984) 10/2/2012  2003
Dollar General Berkeley MO 
 132
 748
 
 880
 (257) 10/9/2012  2012
Dollar General Canyon Lake TX 
 149
 843
 
 992
 (289) 10/12/2012  2012

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Donna TX 
 200
 799
 
 999
 (274) 10/12/2012  2012
O'Reilly Auto Parts Laramie WY 
 144
 1,297
 
 1,441
 (445) 10/12/2012  1999
FedEx Yuma AZ 
 
 2,076
 
 2,076
 (815) 10/17/2012  2011
General Mills Fort Wayne IN 
 2,533
 48,130
 
 50,663
 (18,613) 10/18/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Dothan AL 
 326
 326
 (7) 645
 (91) 12/31/2012 1997 Alton TX 
 169
 958
 (3) 1,124
 (328) 10/18/2012  2006
Advance Auto Parts Enterprise AL 
 280
 420
 (6) 694
 (118) 12/31/2012 1995
Advance Auto Parts Opelika AL 
 289
 1,156
 
 1,445
 (306) 4/24/2013 2013
Advance Auto Parts Brooklyn CT 
 324
 1,429
 
 1,753
 (184) 11/7/2014 2006
Advance Auto Parts Bonita Springs FL 1,561
 1,219
 1,552
 
 2,771
 (343) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Lehigh Acres FL 1,425
 379
 2,016
 
 2,395
 (408) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Albany GA 
 210
 629
 (1) 838
 (177) 12/31/2012 1995
Advance Auto Parts Cairo GA 
 140
 326
 (24) 442
 (89) 12/31/2012 1993
Advance Auto Parts Hazlehurst GA 
 113
 451
 
 564
 (127) 12/31/2012 1998
Advance Auto Parts Hinesville GA 
 352
 430
 
 782
 (121) 12/31/2012 1994
Advance Auto Parts Perry GA 
 209
 487
 (1) 695
 (137) 12/31/2012 1994
Advance Auto Parts Thomasville GA 
 251
 377
 (30) 598
 (103) 12/31/2012 1997
Advance Auto Parts Auburn IN 
 337
 1,347
 
 1,684
 (408) 3/29/2012 2007
Advance Auto Parts Bedford IN 760
 100
 1,386
 
 1,486
 (275) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Clinton IN 
 182
 729
 
 911
 (186) 6/5/2013 2004
Advance Auto Parts Fort Wayne IN 
 193
 450
 
 643
 (123) 2/28/2013 1998
Advance Auto Parts Fort Wayne IN 
 200
 371
 
 571
 (102) 2/28/2013 1998
Advance Auto Parts Franklin IN 738
 511
 1,256
 
 1,767
 (242) 2/7/2014 2010
Advance Auto Parts Mishawaka IN 
 429
 1,373
 
 1,802
 (272) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Richmond IN 
 377
 1,616
 
 1,993
 (315) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Salina KS 
 195
 782
 
 977
 (207) 4/30/2013 2006
Advance Auto Parts Barbourville KY 
 194
 1,098
 
 1,292
 (290) 4/15/2013 2006
Advance Auto Parts Bardstown KY 
 272
 1,090
 236
 1,598
 (309) 12/10/2012 2005
Advance Auto Parts Brandenburg KY 
 186
 742
 
 928
 (209) 12/10/2012 2005
Advance Auto Parts Crestwood KY 1,030
 400
 1,546
 
 1,946
 (297) 2/7/2014 2009
Advance Auto Parts Florence KY 
 550
 1,280
 
 1,830
 (261) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Frankfort KY 
 833
 1,034
 
 1,867
 (202) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Georgetown KY 
 510
 1,323
 
 1,833
 (250) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Hardinsburg KY 
 94
 845
 
 939
 (238) 12/10/2012 2007
Advance Auto Parts Inez KY 
 130
 1,174
 
 1,304
 (342) 8/22/2012 2010
Advance Auto Parts Leitchfield KY 
 104
 939
 (5) 1,038
 (263) 12/10/2012 2005
Advance Auto Parts Louisville KY 740
 336
 1,289
 
 1,625
 (248) 2/7/2014 2009
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 252
 756
 
 1,008
 (259) 10/22/2012  2012
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 222
 888
 
 1,110
 (305) 10/22/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Avinger TX 
 40
 761
 
 801
 (261) 10/22/2012  2012
Dollar General Elmendorf TX 
 94
 847
 
 941
 (291) 10/23/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St. Louis MO 
 445
 1,038
 
 1,483
 (356) 10/23/2012  2012
Dollar General Estherville IA 
 226
 903
 
 1,129
 (310) 10/25/2012  2012
Krystal East Point GA 
 221
 664
 
 885
 (278) 10/26/2012  1984
FedEx Independence KS 
 114
 2,166
 
 2,280
 (838) 10/30/2012  2012
FedEx Ottumwa IA 
 205
 2,552
 2,749
 5,506
 (1,345) 10/30/2012  2012
Dollar General Marionville MO 
 89
 797
 
 886
 (273) 10/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Flint MI 
 91
 820
 
 911
 (281) 10/31/2012  2012
National Tire & Battery St. Louis MO 
 756
 924
 
 1,680
 (342) 10/31/2012  1998
Rite Aid Louisville OH 
 576
 3,266
 
 3,842
 (1,196) 10/31/2012  2008
CVS New Castle PA 
 412
 2,337
 49
 2,798
 (857) 10/31/2012  1999
Mattress Firm Columbus IN 
 157
 891
 
 1,048
 (304) 11/6/2012  1964
Kum & Go Tioga ND 
 318
 2,863
 
 3,181
 (975) 11/8/2012  2012
CVS Henrietta NY 
 965
 1,180
 63
 2,208
 (431) 11/8/2012  1997
Walgreens Cordova TN 
 1,005
 2,345
 
 3,350
 (853) 11/9/2012  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lenox GA 
 90
 809
 
 899
 (276) 11/9/2012  2012
FedEx Chico CA 
 308
 2,776
 242
 3,326
 (1,075) 11/9/2012  2006
Cracker Barrel Braselton GA 2,935
 1,294
 2,403
 
 3,697
 (1,001) 11/13/2012  2005
Cracker Barrel Bremen GA 2,677
 1,012
 2,361
 
 3,373
 (984) 11/13/2012  2006
Cracker Barrel Mebane NC 2,514
 1,106
 2,054
 
 3,160
 (856) 11/13/2012  2004
Cracker Barrel Emporia VA 2,435
 972
 2,267
 
 3,239
 (945) 11/13/2012  2004
Cracker Barrel Woodstock VA 2,262
 928
 2,164
 
 3,092
 (902) 11/13/2012  2005
Rite Aid Marion OH 
 508
 2,877
 
 3,385
 (1,046) 11/13/2012  2006
Rite Aid Lima OH 
 576
 2,304
 
 2,880
 (838) 11/13/2012  2006
Walgreens Clinton MI 
 1,463
 3,413
 153
 5,029
 (1,247) 11/13/2012  2002

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Vacant Warsaw NC 
 75
 1,428
 (1,343) 160
 
 11/13/2012  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kiln MS 
 106
 650
 
 756
 (222) 11/14/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 218
 654
 
 872
 (223) 11/15/2012  2012
AON Lincolnshire IL 92,517
 5,336
 124,777
 
 130,113
 (43,198) 11/16/2012  1998
Dollar General Cedar Creek TX 
 291
 680
 
 971
 (232) 11/16/2012  2012
Dollar General Lacy Lakeview TX 
 146
 826
 
 972
 (281) 11/16/2012  2012
7-Eleven Sarasota FL 
 1,312
 1,312
 
 2,624
 (447) 11/19/2012  2000
Dollar General Beeville TX 
 90
 810
 
 900
 (276) 11/19/2012  2012
Kum & Go Bentonville AR 
 587
 1,370
 (52) 1,905
 (467) 11/20/2012  2009
Kum & Go Lowell AR 
 774
 1,437
 (27) 2,184
 (490) 11/20/2012  2009
Kum & Go Rogers AR 
 668
 1,559
 
 2,227
 (531) 11/20/2012  2008
Kum & Go Ottumwa IA 
 586
 1,368
 
 1,954
 (466) 11/20/2012  1998
DaVita Dialysis Federal Way WA 17,751
 1,929
 22,357
 
 24,286
 (8,894) 11/21/2012  2000
GE Aviation Auburn AL 24,133
 1,627
 30,920
 8
 32,555
 (9,913) 11/21/2012  1995
Dollar General Doyline LA 
 88
 793
 
 881
 (270) 11/27/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Detroit MI 
 130
 1,169
 
 1,299
 (398) 11/27/2012  2011
Rubbermaid Winfield KS 
 819
 15,555
 
 16,374
 (5,967) 11/28/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts West Liberty KY 
 249
 996
 
 1,245
 (263) 4/15/2013 2006 Sweetwater TN 
 360
 839
 
 1,199
 (286) 11/29/2012  2006
Advance Auto Parts Rayne LA 
 122
 490
 84
 696
 (129) 5/21/2013 2000
Advance Auto Parts Brownstown MI 
 482
 1,760
 
 2,242
 (342) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Caro MI 
 117
 665
 (9) 773
 (206) 11/23/2011 2002
Advance Auto Parts Charlotte MI 
 123
 697
 (6) 814
 (217) 11/23/2011 2002
Advance Auto Parts Flint MI 
 133
 534
 (3) 664
 (166) 11/23/2011 2002
Advance Auto Parts Grand Rapids MI 657
 368
 1,296
 
 1,664
 (244) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Howell MI 830
 439
 1,471
 
 1,910
 (283) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Livonia MI 
 210
 643
 
 853
 (199) 12/12/2011 2003
Advance Auto Parts Manistee MI 
 348
 1,043
 
 1,391
 (276) 4/15/2013 2007
Advance Auto Parts Monroe MI 
 549
 1,434
 
 1,983
 (280) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Romulus MI 
 422
 1,568
 
 1,990
 (313) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Sault Ste. Marie MI 
 75
 671
 80
 826
 (215) 11/23/2011 2003
Advance Auto Parts South Lyon MI 
 402
 1,607
 
 2,009
 (310) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Tecumseh MI 
 281
 1,214
 
 1,495
 (227) 5/27/2014 2009
Advance Auto Parts Washington Twnshp MI 
 645
 1,711
 
 2,356
 (335) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Tupelo MS 
 258
 427
 
 685
 (109) 2/20/2014 1998
Advance Auto Parts Candler NC 
 399
 1,202
 
 1,601
 (237) 2/7/2014 2012
Advance Auto Parts Charlotte NC 
 723
 883
 
 1,606
 (180) 2/7/2014 2001
Advance Auto Parts Eden NC 
 320
 746
 
 1,066
 (187) 7/16/2013 2004
Advance Auto Parts Granite Falls NC 
 251
 1,005
 
 1,256
 (293) 8/9/2012 2010
Advance Auto Parts Rocky Mount NC 
 348
 836
 
 1,184
 (194) 2/21/2014 2005
Advance Auto Parts Lakewood NJ 
 750
 1,750
 
 2,500
 (510) 8/22/2012 2010
Advance Auto Parts Woodbury NJ 
 446
 1,784
 
 2,230
 (528) 6/20/2012 2007
Advance Auto Parts Bethel OH 730
 234
 1,305
 
 1,539
 (258) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Canton OH 639
 443
 1,206
 
 1,649
 (251) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Dayton OH 
 470
 1,349
 
 1,819
 (273) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Delaware OH 706
 502
 1,274
 
 1,776
 (256) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Eaton OH 
 157
 471
 
 628
 (120) 6/13/2013 1987
Advance Auto Parts Franklin OH 
 218
 873
 
 1,091
 (254) 8/9/2012 1984
Advance Auto Parts Holland OH 647
 131
 1,453
 
 1,584
 (282) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Massillon OH 
 218
 1,987
 
 2,205
 (392) 2/7/2014 2007
Bojangles Biscoe NC 
 247
 986
 
 1,233
 (411) 11/29/2012  2010
Bojangles Moncks Corner SC 
 505
 1,179
 
 1,684
 (491) 11/29/2012  2010
Bojangles Walterboro SC 
 454
 1,363
 
 1,817
 (568) 11/29/2012  2010
Tractor Supply Plymouth NH 2,074
 424
 2,430
 15
 2,869
 (750) 11/29/2012  2011
CVS Mechanicsburg PA 
 1,155
 3,465
 
 4,620
 (1,260) 11/29/2012  2008
FedEx Roseville MN 
 1,462
 8,282
 
 9,744
 (3,177) 11/30/2012  2012
Walgreens Jeffersonville IN 
 824
 2,472
 
 3,296
 (899) 11/30/2012  2008
Walgreens Lawrenceburg KY 
 567
 2,267
 
 2,834
 (825) 11/30/2012  2008
Walgreens Lexington KY 
 
 1,943
 
 1,943
 (707) 11/30/2012  2007
Walgreens Paris KY 
 743
 2,228
 
 2,971
 (811) 11/30/2012  2008
Walgreens Scottsville KY 
 153
 2,904
 
 3,057
 (1,056) 11/30/2012  2007
Walgreens Stanford KY 
 152
 2,886
 
 3,038
 (1,050) 11/30/2012  2009
Walgreens Huntington WV 
 964
 2,250
 
 3,214
 (819) 11/30/2012  2008
Dollar General Maynard AR 
 73
 654
 
 727
 (221) 12/4/2012  1995
Dollar General Wooster AR 
 74
 664
 
 738
 (225) 12/4/2012  1995

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Mattress Firm Florence SC 
 398
 929
 32
 1,359
 (314) 12/7/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Chireno TX 
 50
 943
 
 993
 (319) 12/10/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Salem OH 660
 267
 1,147
 
 1,414
 (227) 2/7/2014 2009 Bardstown KY 
 272
 1,090
 234
 1,596
 (375) 12/10/2012  2005
Advance Auto Parts Springfield OH 
 461
 1,075
 
 1,536
 (303) 12/31/2012 2005 Brandenburg KY 
 186
 742
 
 928
 (251) 12/10/2012  2005
Advance Auto Parts Toledo OH 619
 116
 1,375
 
 1,491
 (267) 2/7/2014 2009 Hardinsburg KY 
 94
 845
 
 939
 (286) 12/10/2012  2007
Advance Auto Parts Twinsburg OH 619
 486
 1,004
 
 1,490
 (205) 2/7/2014 2009 Leitchfield KY 
 104
 939
 (5) 1,038
 (315) 12/10/2012  2005
Advance Auto Parts Van Wert OH 
 33
 630
 
 663
 (161) 6/13/2013 1995 Titusville PA 
 207
 1,172
 
 1,379
 (397) 12/12/2012  2010
Advance Auto Parts Vermilion OH 
 337
 1,079
 
 1,416
 (228) 2/7/2014 2006
Advance Auto Parts Warren OH 
 83
 745
 (2) 826
 (223) 4/12/2012 2003
Advance Auto Parts Oklahoma City OK 
 208
 1,178
 
 1,386
 (343) 8/9/2012 2007
Advance Auto Parts Sapulpa OK 704
 362
 1,300
 
 1,662
 (245) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Chambersburg PA 
 553
 830
 
 1,383
 (227) 2/28/2013 1997
Advance Auto Parts Selinsgrove PA 
 99
 891
 
 990
 (227) 6/3/2013 2003
Advance Auto Parts Titusville PA 
 207
 1,172
 
 1,379
 (331) 12/12/2012 2010
Advance Auto Parts Chapin SC 
 395
 922
 
 1,317
 (273) 6/20/2012 2007
Advance Auto Parts Chesterfield SC 
 131
 745
 
 876
 (220) 6/27/2012 2008
Advance Auto Parts Greenwood SC 
 210
 630
 
 840
 (191) 3/9/2012 1995
Advance Auto Parts Rock Hill SC 
 506
 915
 44
 1,465
 (182) 2/7/2014 1995
Advance Auto Parts Sweetwater TN 
 360
 839
 
 1,199
 (239) 11/29/2012 2006
Advance Auto Parts Alton TX 
 169
 958
 (3) 1,124
 (274) 10/18/2012 2006
Advance Auto Parts Deer Park TX 
 295
 1,507
 
 1,802
 (287) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 800
 343
 1,029
 
 1,372
 (326) 9/30/2011 2006
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 800
 248
 991
 
 1,239
 (314) 9/30/2011 2006
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 837
 685
 
 1,522
 (199) 8/21/2012 2007
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 285
 1,405
 
 1,690
 (269) 2/7/2014 2006
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 225
 1,293
 
 1,518
 (246) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 189
 1,666
 
 1,855
 (316) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Humble TX 
 420
 1,404
 
 1,824
 (269) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Huntsville TX 
 327
 1,278
 
 1,605
 (245) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Kingwood TX 
 419
 1,392
 
 1,811
 (267) 2/7/2014 2009
Advance Auto Parts Lubbock TX 
 265
 1,259
 
 1,524
 (243) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts Pasadena TX 
 382
 1,146
 
 1,528
 (337) 7/6/2012 2008
Advance Auto Parts Spring TX 
 388
 1,616
 
 2,004
 (290) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Webster TX 
 385
 1,452
 
 1,837
 (277) 2/7/2014 2008
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Oakhurst TX 
 36
 683
 
 719
 (231) 12/12/2012  2012
Walgreens Troy MI 
 
 1,896
 3
 1,899
 (985) 12/12/2012  2000
Vacant Greenville NC 
 1,085
 1,085
 (1,322) 848
 (14) 12/12/2012  2012
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 445
 1,039
 
 1,484
 (352) 12/14/2012  2012
Citizens Bank Keene NH 1,885
 132
 2,511
 
 2,643
 (814) 12/14/2012  1900
Citizens Bank Fairlawn OH 1,885
 511
 2,045
 
 2,556
 (663) 12/14/2012  1979
Citizens Bank Altoona PA 
 153
 459
 
 612
 (149) 12/14/2012  1971
Citizens Bank Dillsburg PA 
 232
 926
 
 1,158
 (300) 12/14/2012  1935
Vacant Matamoras PA 
 509
 946
 (1,435) 20
 
 12/14/2012  1920
Citizens Bank Mercer PA 
 105
 314
 (239) 180
 (1) 12/14/2012  1964
Citizens Bank Milford PA 
 513
 769
 
 1,282
 (249) 12/14/2012  1981
Citizens Bank Oakmont PA 
 199
 1,127
 
 1,326
 (366) 12/14/2012  1967
Vacant Pittsburgh PA 
 185
 1,051
 (871) 365
 
 12/14/2012  1960
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 389
 1,168
 
 1,557
 (379) 12/14/2012  1940
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 146
 2,770
 (1,726) 1,190
 (52) 12/14/2012  1900
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 2,262
 470
 2,661
 
 3,131
 (863) 12/14/2012  1979
Citizens Bank Tyrone PA 
 146
 583
 
 729
 (189) 12/14/2012  1967
Citizens Bank Upper Darby PA 
 411
 617
 
 1,028
 (200) 12/14/2012  1966
Citizens Bank Middlebury VT 
 363
 544
 
 907
 (176) 12/14/2012  1969
US Bank Orland Hills IL 2,646
 1,253
 2,327
 
 3,580
 (754) 12/14/2012  1995
Citizens Bank Milton MA 2,244
 619
 2,476
 
 3,095
 (803) 12/14/2012  1968
Vacant Highspire PA 
 216
 649
 (815) 50
 
 12/14/2012  1974
Vacant Pitcairn PA 
 46
 867
 (908) 5
 
 12/14/2012  1985
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 1,244
 516
 1,204
 
 1,720
 (390) 12/14/2012  1970
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 918
 196
 1,110
 
 1,306
 (360) 12/14/2012  1980
Vacant Pittsburgh PA 
 255
 1,019
 
 1,274
 (330) 12/14/2012  1970

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts Appleton WI 
 498
 1,228
 
 1,726
 (248) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Fort Atkinson WI 
 353
 824
 
 1,177
 (203) 8/26/2013 2004
Advance Auto Parts Janesville WI 939
 299
 1,695
 
 1,994
 (334) 2/7/2014 2007
Advance Auto Parts Kenosha WI 
 569
 465
 
 1,034
 (125) 3/13/2013 2004
Advance Auto Parts Milwaukee WI 
 610
 1,473
 
 2,083
 (289) 2/7/2014 2008
Advance Auto Parts St. Mary's WV 
 309
 928
 
 1,237
 (262) 12/28/2012 2007
Aetna Life Insurance Fresno CA 
 3,405
 22,343
 (116) 25,632
 (1,472) 11/5/2013 1969
AGCO Duluth GA 8,600
 3,503
 14,842
 10
 18,355
 (2,474) 2/7/2014 1999
Albertson's Lake Havasu City AZ 
 1,275
 5,396
 
 6,671
 (1,229) 2/7/2014 2003
Albertson's Mesa AZ 
 1,944
 4,145
 
 6,089
 (910) 2/7/2014 1997
Albertson's Phoenix AZ 
 2,456
 4,628
 
 7,084
 (1,008) 2/7/2014 1998
Albertson's Scottsdale AZ 
 2,872
 7,943
 
 10,815
 (1,743) 2/7/2014 1991
Albertson's Tucson AZ 
 2,710
 7,704
 
 10,414
 (1,699) 2/7/2014 2000
Albertson's Tucson AZ 
 1,642
 3,587
 
 5,229
 (813) 2/7/2014 1994
Albertson's Yuma AZ 
 1,574
 6,452
 
 8,026
 (1,432) 2/7/2014 2003
Albertson's Denver CO 
 2,058
 5,286
 
 7,344
 (1,136) 2/7/2014 2002
Albertson's Durango CO 
 3,520
 3,404
 
 6,924
 (788) 2/7/2014 1993
Albertson's Fort Collins CO 
 1,288
 6,612
 
 7,900
 (1,443) 2/7/2014 1996
Albertson's Alexandria LA 
 1,423
 6,024
 
 7,447
 (1,374) 2/7/2014 1990
Albertson's Baton Rouge LA 
 1,711
 7,061
 
 8,772
 (1,588) 2/7/2014 1991
Albertson's Baton Rouge LA 
 1,681
 5,673
 
 7,354
 (1,284) 2/7/2014 1992
Albertson's Baton Rouge LA 
 1,932
 7,836
 
 9,768
 (1,791) 2/7/2014 1985
Albertson's Bossier City LA 
 1,949
 5,125
 
 7,074
 (1,129) 2/7/2014 1988
Albertson's Lafayette LA 
 1,556
 7,926
 
 9,482
 (1,828) 2/7/2014 2000
Albertson's Albuquerque NM 
 2,834
 3,682
 
 6,516
 (1,111) 2/7/2014 1997
Albertson's Albuquerque NM 
 2,950
 3,388
 
 6,338
 (1,046) 2/7/2014 1978
Albertson's Clovis NM 
 769
 4,865
 
 5,634
 (1,253) 2/7/2014 1984
Albertson's Farmington NM 
 1,442
 2,505
 
 3,947
 (707) 2/7/2014 2002
Albertson's Las Cruces NM 
 1,588
 5,719
 
 7,307
 (1,586) 2/7/2014 1997
Albertson's Los Lunas NM 
 1,105
 4,770
 
 5,875
 (1,273) 2/7/2014 1991
Albertson's Silver City NM 
 591
 3,824
 
 4,415
 (1,099) 2/7/2014 1982

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 268
 2,413
 
 2,681
 (782) 12/14/2012  1970
Vacant Reading PA 
 267
 802
 (820) 249
 
 12/14/2012  1970
Dollar General Mount Morris IL 
 97
 877
 
 974
 (297) 12/17/2012  2012
Dollar General Melrose MN 
 96
 863
 
 959
 (292) 12/17/2012  2012
Dollar General Montgomery MN 
 87
 783
 
 870
 (265) 12/17/2012  2012
Dollar General Blessing TX 
 83
 745
 
 828
 (252) 12/18/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Barryton MI 
 32
 599
 
 631
 (203) 12/18/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tustin MI 
 33
 633
 
 666
 (214) 12/18/2012  2012
Dollar General Wakefield MI 
 88
 794
 
 882
 (269) 12/19/2012  2012
Hanesbrands Rural Hall NC 17,990
 1,082
 22,565
 (202) 23,445
 (8,911) 12/21/2012  1989
Walgreens Columbia MS 
 452
 4,072
 
 4,524
 (1,471) 12/21/2012  2011
Kum & Go Fountain CO 
 1,131
 1,696
 
 2,827
 (574) 12/24/2012  2012
Kum & Go Monument CO 
 1,192
 1,457
 
 2,649
 (493) 12/24/2012  2012
7-Eleven Gloucester VA 
 144
 578
 
 722
 (195) 12/24/2012  1985
7-Eleven Hampton VA 
 69
 624
 
 693
 (211) 12/24/2012  1986
7-Eleven Hampton VA 
 161
 644
 
 805
 (218) 12/24/2012  1959
Dollar General Springfield MN 
 88
 795
 
 883
 (269) 12/26/2012  2012
Dollar General Corpus Christi TX 
 270
 809
 
 1,079
 (274) 12/26/2012  2012
Kum & Go Cheyenne WY 
 411
 2,327
 
 2,738
 (787) 12/27/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts Calera AL 
 723
 723
 
 1,446
 (245) 12/27/2012  2008
Kum & Go Muscatine IA 
 794
 1,853
 
 2,647
 (627) 12/27/2012  2012
Advance Auto Parts St. Mary's WV 
 309
 928
 
 1,237
 (314) 12/28/2012  2007
Academy Sports + Outdoors Fayetteville AR 7,290
 1,900
 7,601
 
 9,501
 (3,046) 12/28/2012  2012
Citizens Bank N. Providence RI 1,445
 200
 1,800
 
 2,000
 (584) 12/31/2012  1971
DaVita Dialysis Allen Park MI 
 209
 1,885
 151
 2,245
 (618) 12/31/2012  1955
Pantry Gas & Convenience Montgomery AL 
 526
 1,228
 
 1,754
 (415) 12/31/2012  1998
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,332
 1,332
 
 2,664
 (451) 12/31/2012  2004
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,667
 417
 
 2,084
 (141) 12/31/2012  1982
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,191
 1,787
 
 2,978
 (604) 12/31/2012  1987
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,070
 1,308
 
 2,378
 (443) 12/31/2012  1997
Pantry Gas & Convenience Conover NC 
 1,144
 936
 
 2,080
 (317) 12/31/2012  1998
Pantry Gas & Convenience Cornelius NC 
 1,847
 2,258
 
 4,105
 (764) 12/31/2012  1999
Pantry Gas & Convenience Lincolnton NC 
 1,766
 2,159
 
 3,925
 (730) 12/31/2012  2000

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Albertson's Abilene TX 
 1,187
 6,373
 
 7,560
 (1,389) 2/7/2014 1984
Albertson's Arlington TX 
 1,714
 6,560
 
 8,274
 (1,429) 2/7/2014 2002
Albertson's El Paso TX 
 1,375
 6,447
 
 7,822
 (1,458) 2/7/2014 1978
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 2,146
 4,678
 
 6,824
 (1,075) 2/7/2014 2000
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 1,833
 7,311
 
 9,144
 (1,571) 2/7/2014 2004
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 1,833
 4,528
 
 6,361
 (1,007) 2/7/2014 2002
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 1,174
 6,255
 
 7,429
 (1,319) 2/7/2014 1988
Albertson's Midland TX 
 1,002
 9,885
 
 10,887
 (2,120) 2/7/2014 1984
Albertson's Odessa TX 
 947
 8,867
 
 9,814
 (1,879) 2/7/2014 1985
Albertson's Weatherford TX 
 1,820
 5,771
 
 7,591
 (1,280) 2/7/2014 2001
Ale House Orlando FL 
 290
 3,647
 (1,300) 2,637
 (244) 6/27/2013 1995
Ale House St. Petersburg FL 
 930
 3,116
 
 4,046
 (797) 6/27/2013 1995
Aliberto's Mexican Food Holbrook AZ 
 32
 96
 
 128
 (24) 6/27/2013 1981
Allied Power Group Houston TX 
 1,659
 13,161
 (7,475) 7,345
 
 6/12/2014 2009
Amazon West Columbia SC 
 3,112
 53,103
 
 56,215
 (9,907) 2/7/2014 2012
Amazon Charleston TN 38,500
 2,678
 50,880
 
 53,558
 (9,387) 2/7/2014 2011
Amazon Chattanooga TN 40,800
 1,995
 54,332
 
 56,327
 (10,267) 2/7/2014 2011
Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, Inc Alhambra CA 
 7,143
 8,730
 
 15,873
 (2,640) 1/24/2013 1966
AMEC Foster Wheeler Oil & Gas Houston TX 
 2,524
 30,398
 
 32,922
 (6,309) 11/5/2013 1998
Amega West West Alexander PA 
 117
 1,787
 
 1,904
 (299) 6/12/2014 2010
Amega West Midland TX 
 591
 379
 
 970
 (67) 6/12/2014 1979
Ameriprise Ashwaubenon WI 10,998
 751
 14,260
 
 15,011
 (3,412) 1/25/2013 2000
Amesbury Truth Statesville NC 
 424
 23,261
 
 23,685
 (130) 10/24/2017 2017
AON Lincolnshire IL 92,517
 5,336
 124,777
 
 130,113
 (33,917) 11/16/2012 1998
Apple Market St. Joseph MO 
 639
 1,638
 
 2,277
 (322) 3/28/2014 1981
Applebee's Auburn AL 
 1,155
 1,732
 
 2,887
 (459) 7/31/2013 1993
Applebee's Oxford AL 
 1,162
 2,157
 
 3,319
 (541) 8/30/2013 1995
Applebee's Phenix City AL 
 1,488
 2,232
 
 3,720
 (592) 7/31/2013 1999
Applebee's West Memphis AR 
 388
 1,536
 
 1,924
 (356) 2/7/2014 2006
Applebee's Arvada CO 
 754
 1,760
 
 2,514
 (467) 7/31/2013 1996
Applebee's Brighton CO 
 657
 1,972
 
 2,629
 (523) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's Colorado Springs CO 
 499
 1,996
 
 2,495
 (529) 7/31/2013 1995
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pantry Gas & Convenience Matthews NC 
 980
 1,819
 
 2,799
 (616) 12/31/2012  1987
Pantry Gas & Convenience Thomasville NC 
 1,175
 1,436
 
 2,611
 (486) 12/31/2012  2000
Pantry Gas & Convenience Fort Mill SC 
 1,311
 1,967
 
 3,278
 (665) 12/31/2012  1988
DaVita Dialysis Beeville TX 
 99
 1,879
 
 1,978
 (608) 12/31/2012  1979
Advance Auto Parts Albany GA 
 210
 629
 66
 905
 (215) 12/31/2012  1995
Advance Auto Parts Hazlehurst GA 
 113
 451
 104
 668
 (155) 12/31/2012  1998
Advance Auto Parts Hinesville GA 
 352
 430
 72
 854
 (147) 12/31/2012  1994
Advance Auto Parts Thomasville GA 
 251
 377
 (30) 598
 (122) 12/31/2012  1997
Advance Auto Parts Dothan AL 
 326
 326
 (8) 644
 (109) 12/31/2012  1997
Advance Auto Parts Enterprise AL 
 280
 420
 50
 750
 (142) 12/31/2012  1995
Advance Auto Parts Perry GA 
 209
 487
 67
 763
 (166) 12/31/2012  1994
Advance Auto Parts Cairo GA 
 140
 326
 29
 495
 (107) 12/31/2012  1993
Synovus Bank Tampa FL 
 985
 2,298
 
 3,283
 (745) 12/31/2012  1959
Advance Auto Parts Springfield OH 
 461
 1,075
 
 1,536
 (364) 12/31/2012  2005
Dollar General Center Point IA 
 136
 772
 
 908
 (261) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Roodhouse IL 
 207
 829
 
 1,036
 (281) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Savanna IL 
 273
 1,093
 
 1,366
 (370) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Caulfield MO 
 139
 789
 
 928
 (267) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar General Adkins TX 
 157
 889
 
 1,046
 (301) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Somerville TX 
 131
 743
 
 874
 (251) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pulaski IL 
 31
 588
 
 619
 (199) 12/31/2012  2012
Mattress Firm Bountiful UT 
 736
 1,367
 
 2,103
 (462) 12/31/2012  2012
Dollar General McMechen WV 
 91
 819
 
 910
 (275) 1/9/2013  2012
Dollar General Virginia MN 
 147
 831
 
 978
 (279) 1/14/2013  2012
Dollar General Cowen WV 
 196
 783
 
 979
 (263) 1/16/2013  2012
Orora Alhambra CA 
 7,143
 8,730
 
 15,873
 (3,295) 1/24/2013  1966
US Bank Chicago Heights IL 
 182
 1,637
 
 1,819
 (527) 1/24/2013  1996
Walgreens Acworth GA 
 1,583
 2,940
 
 4,523
 (1,055) 1/25/2013  2012
Ameriprise Ashwaubenon WI 10,998
 751
 14,260
 
 15,011
 (4,285) 1/25/2013  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hattiesburg MS 
 225
 674
 
 899
 (226) 1/30/2013  2012



F-78


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 1,212
 2,829
 198
 4,239
 (1,015) 1/30/2013  1999
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Chimayo NM 
 158
 632
 (15) 775
 (210) 1/30/2013  2009
Fresenius Medical Care Bossier City LA 
 120
 682
 
 802
 (199) 1/30/2013  2008
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 1,617
 3,003
 
 4,620
 (1,077) 1/30/2013  2007
Dollar General Ottumwa IA 
 143
 812
 
 955
 (273) 1/31/2013  2012
Dollar General Olivia MN 
 98
 884
 
 982
 (297) 1/31/2013  2012
Dollar General Victoria TX 
 91
 817
 ���
 908
 (275) 1/31/2013  2013
Dollar General Donna TX 
 145
 820
 
 965
 (276) 1/31/2013  2012
Rubbermaid Brimfield OH 
 1,552
 29,495
 
 31,047
 (11,134) 1/31/2013  2012
Mattress Firm Rogers AR 
 321
 1,284
 
 1,605
 (428) 2/6/2013  2012
CVS Shippensburg PA 
 351
 1,988
 
 2,339
 (708) 2/8/2013  2002
Mattress Firm Evansville IN 
 117
 2,227
 
 2,344
 (743) 2/11/2013  1995
Dollar General Eldon MO 
 52
 986
 
 1,038
 (329) 2/14/2013  2013
Dollar General New Braunfels TX 
 95
 855
 
 950
 (285) 2/14/2013  2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 163
 926
 
 1,089
 (309) 2/14/2013  2013
Dollar General Skidmore TX 
 90
 811
 
 901
 (271) 2/14/2013  2013
Dollar General De Soto MO 
 101
 912
 
 1,013
 (304) 2/14/2013  2013
Stripes Andrews TX 
 406
 2,302
 
 2,708
 (768) 2/15/2013  2008
Stripes La Feria TX 
 219
 1,970
 
 2,189
 (657) 2/15/2013  2008
Stripes Pharr TX 
 281
 2,531
 
 2,812
 (845) 2/15/2013  1995
Stripes Rio Hondo TX 
 293
 2,640
 
 2,933
 (881) 2/15/2013  2008
Dollar General Osceola MO 
 93
 835
 
 928
 (279) 2/19/2013  2012
Academy Sports + Outdoors Dalton GA 4,965
 998
 5,656
 
 6,654
 (2,244) 2/20/2013  2012
BJ's Wholesale Club North Canton OH 6,787
 456
 8,668
 422
 9,546
 (3,481) 2/20/2013  1998
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kemmerer WY 
 45
 853
 
 898
 (285) 2/22/2013  2013
Idaho Guns & Outdoors Boise ID 
 335
 1,339
 39
 1,713
 (447) 2/22/2013  2013
US Bank Westchester IL 
 366
 853
 
 1,219
 (273) 2/22/2013  1986
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Toledo OH 
 306
 917
 
 1,223
 (306) 2/25/2013  2012
FedEx Wendover NV 
 262
 1,483
 
 1,745
 (555) 2/25/2013  2012
Dollar General Camden MI 
 138
 781
 
 919
 (260) 2/27/2013  2013
Dollar General Manchester MI 
 213
 853
 
 1,066
 (285) 2/27/2013  2013
Dollar General Manistique MI 
 155
 876
 
 1,031
 (292) 2/27/2013  2012
Dollar General Mount Morris MI 
 110
 988
 
 1,098
 (330) 2/27/2013  2012

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Applebee's Colorado Springs CO 
 629
 1,888
 
 2,517
 (501) 7/31/2013 1994
Applebee's Greeley CO 
 559
 2,235
 
 2,794
 (593) 7/31/2013 1995
Applebee's Northglenn CO 
 578
 1,734
 
 2,312
 (460) 7/31/2013 1993
Applebee's Pueblo CO 
 752
 2,257
 
 3,009
 (587) 8/30/2013 1998
Applebee's Pueblo CO 
 960
 2,879
 
 3,839
 (764) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's Thornton CO 
 681
 2,043
 
 2,724
 (532) 8/30/2013 1994
Applebee's Bradenton FL 
 2,475
 3,713
 
 6,188
 (985) 7/31/2013 1994
Applebee's Brandon FL 
 2,453
 3,647
 
 6,100
 (950) 6/27/2013 1997
Applebee's Crestview FL 
 943
 1,752
 
 2,695
 (465) 7/31/2013 2000
Applebee's Crystal River FL 
 1,328
 2,467
 
 3,795
 (654) 7/31/2013 2001
Applebee's Davenport FL 
 1,506
 4,517
 
 6,023
 (1,198) 7/31/2013 2007
Applebee's Inverness FL 
 1,977
 2,965
 
 4,942
 (787) 7/31/2013 2000
Applebee's Lakeland FL 
 1,283
 2,383
 
 3,666
 (632) 7/31/2013 1997
Applebee's Lakeland FL 
 1,959
 3,638
 
 5,597
 (965) 7/31/2013 2000
Applebee's Largo FL 
 2,334
 3,501
 
 5,835
 (929) 7/31/2013 1995
Applebee's New Port Richey FL 
 1,695
 3,147
 
 4,842
 (835) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's Plant City FL 
 2,079
 2,869
 
 4,948
 (747) 6/27/2013 2001
Applebee's Riverview FL 
 1,849
 3,434
 
 5,283
 (911) 7/31/2013 2006
Applebee's St. Petersburg FL 
 2,329
 3,493
 
 5,822
 (927) 7/31/2013 1994
Applebee's Temple Terrace FL 
 2,396
 3,594
 
 5,990
 (953) 7/31/2013 1993
Applebee's Valrico FL 
 1,202
 3,274
 
 4,476
 (853) 6/27/2013 1998
Applebee's Wesley Chapel FL 
 3,272
 3,272
 
 6,544
 (868) 7/31/2013 2000
Applebee's Winter Haven FL 
 2,130
 2,603
 
 4,733
 (690) 7/31/2013 1999
Applebee's Augusta GA 
 1,254
 2,329
 
 3,583
 (618) 7/31/2013 1987
Applebee's Dublin GA 
 1,171
 1,431
 
 2,602
 (380) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's Evans GA 
 1,426
 2,649
 
 4,075
 (703) 7/31/2013 2004
Applebee's Milledgeville GA 
 1,174
 1,761
 
 2,935
 (467) 7/31/2013 1999
Applebee's Savannah GA 
 1,329
 2,468
 
 3,797
 (655) 7/31/2013 1994
Applebee's Clinton IA 
 490
 1,184
 
 1,674
 (303) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's Fort Dodge IA 
 
 1,363
 
 1,363
 (549) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's Marshalltown IA 
 660
 1,175
 
 1,835
 (300) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's Mason City IA 
 340
 1,495
 
 1,835
 (382) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Rapid City MI 
 179
 716
 
 895
 (239) 2/27/2013  2012
Dollar General Romulus MI 
 199
 794
 
 993
 (265) 2/27/2013  2011
Advance Auto Parts Birmingham AL 
 330
 494
 
 824
 (165) 2/28/2013  1999
Advance Auto Parts Birmingham AL 
 455
 373
 58
 886
 (127) 2/28/2013  1997
Advance Auto Parts Fort Wayne IN 
 193
 450
 
 643
 (150) 2/28/2013  1998
Advance Auto Parts Fort Wayne IN 
 200
 371
 
 571
 (124) 2/28/2013  1998
Advance Auto Parts Chambersburg PA 
 553
 830
 
 1,383
 (277) 2/28/2013  1997
Bojangles Greenwood SC 
 440
 1,320
 
 1,760
 (540) 2/28/2013  2011
CVS Harper Woods MI 
 499
 2,829
 (2,038) 1,290
 (10) 2/28/2013  1999
CVS Detroit MI 
 270
 2,427
 (2,234) 463
 
 2/28/2013  1999
CVS Stockbridge GA 
 855
 1,283
 
 2,138
 (457) 2/28/2013  1998
CVS Greenville SC 
 169
 1,520
 
 1,689
 (541) 2/28/2013  1997
Fresenius Medical Care Dallas TX 
 377
 1,132
 80
 1,589
 (319) 2/28/2013  1958
Dollar General Aurora MO 
 98
 881
 
 979
 (294) 2/28/2013  2013
Dollar General Belton TX 
 89
 804
 
 893
 (268) 2/28/2013  2013
Tractor Supply Los Banos CA 3,468
 1,213
 3,638
 
 4,851
 (1,097) 2/28/2013  2009
Walgreens Aibonito Pueblo PR 5,695
 1,855
 5,566
 
 7,421
 (1,969) 3/5/2013  2012
Dollar General Holly Hill SC 1,983
 259
 2,333
 
 2,592
 (773) 3/6/2013  2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 239
 956
 
 1,195
 (317) 3/11/2013  2013
Advance Auto Parts Kenosha WI 
 569
 465
 
 1,034
 (154) 3/13/2013  2004
TD Bank Falmouth ME 19,607
 4,057
 23,689
 307
 28,053
 (7,005) 3/18/2013  2002
Mattress Firm Knoxville TN 
 586
 1,088
 
 1,674
 (360) 3/19/2013  2012
FedEx Waterloo IA 
 152
 2,882
 
 3,034
 (1,070) 3/22/2013  2006
SunTrust Bank Dunedin FL 
 479
 1,917
 
 2,396
 (608) 3/22/2013  1995
SunTrust Bank Dunnellon FL 
 82
 463
 
 545
 (147) 3/22/2013  1980
SunTrust Bank North Port FL 
 460
 1,381
 
 1,841
 (438) 3/22/2013  1982
SunTrust Bank Plant City FL 
 751
 1,753
 
 2,504
 (556) 3/22/2013  2000
SunTrust Bank Port Orange FL 
 590
 1,095
 
 1,685
 (347) 3/22/2013  1989
SunTrust Bank Port Orange FL 
 563
 1,314
 
 1,877
 (417) 3/22/2013  1982
SunTrust Bank West Palm Beach FL 
 1,026
 1,026
 
 2,052
 (325) 3/22/2013  1981
SunTrust Bank Dunwoody GA 
 1,784
 1,460
 
 3,244
 (463) 3/22/2013  1972
SunTrust Bank Jesup GA 
 184
 1,657
 
 1,841
 (526) 3/22/2013  1964
SunTrust Bank St. Simons Island GA 
 1,363
 734
 
 2,097
 (233) 3/22/2013  1975

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Applebee's Muscatine IA 
 330
 1,266
 
 1,596
 (324) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's Boise ID 
 948
 1,761
 
 2,709
 (467) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's Garden City ID 
 628
 2,512
 
 3,140
 (654) 8/30/2013 2003
Applebee's Nampa ID 
 729
 2,915
 
 3,644
 (773) 7/31/2013 2000
Applebee's Pocatello ID 
 612
 1,837
 
 2,449
 (487) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's Marion IL 
 855
 1,527
 
 2,382
 (372) 2/7/2014 1998
Applebee's Sterling IL 
 390
 1,291
 
 1,681
 (330) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's Swansea IL 
 727
 1,741
 
 2,468
 (412) 2/7/2014 1998
Applebee's Newton KS 
 504
 1,569
 
 2,073
 (408) 6/27/2013 1998
Applebee's Fall River MA 
 275
 1,558
 
 1,833
 (413) 7/31/2013 1994
Applebee's Adrian MI 
 407
 2,351
 
 2,758
 (558) 2/7/2014 1995
Applebee's Kalamazoo MI 
 575
 2,644
 
 3,219
 (549) 2/7/2014 1994
Applebee's Farmington MO 
 574
 2,242
 
 2,816
 (528) 2/7/2014 1999
Applebee's Joplin MO 
 754
 1,829
 
 2,583
 (467) 2/7/2014 1994
Applebee's Rolla MO 
 671
 2,272
 
 2,943
 (536) 2/7/2014 1997
Applebee's St. Charles MO 
 781
 1,075
 
 1,856
 (203) 6/23/2014 1990
Applebee's Horn Lake MS 
 584
 1,642
 
 2,226
 (376) 2/7/2014 2005
Applebee's Ocean Springs MS 
 673
 1,708
 
 2,381
 (445) 6/27/2013 2000
Applebee's Alamogordo NM 
 271
 2,438
 
 2,709
 (635) 8/30/2013 2000
Applebee's Hobbs NM 
 600
 3,401
 
 4,001
 (902) 7/31/2013 2002
Applebee's Rio Rancho NM 
 645
 3,654
 
 4,299
 (969) 7/31/2013 1995
Applebee's Roswell NM 
 405
 2,295
 
 2,700
 (609) 7/31/2013 1998
Applebee's North Canton OH 
 152
 838
 
 990
 (218) 6/27/2013 1992
Applebee's Clackamas OR 
 901
 2,103
 
 3,004
 (558) 7/31/2013 1997
Applebee's Gresham OR 
 853
 2,560
 
 3,413
 (666) 8/30/2013 2004
Applebee's Lake Oswego OR 
 1,352
 1,652
 
 3,004
 (438) 7/31/2013 1993
Applebee's Roseburg OR 
 717
 1,673
 
 2,390
 (436) 8/30/2013 2000
Applebee's Tualatin OR 
 1,116
 2,072
 
 3,188
 (550) 7/31/2013 2002
Applebee's Chambersburg PA 
 591
 2,416
 
 3,007
 (499) 2/7/2014 1995
Applebee's Greenville SC 
 600
 2,166
 (1,527) 1,239
 (15) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's Bartlett TN 
 315
 2,201
 
 2,516
 (489) 2/7/2014 2005
Applebee's Corpus Christi TX 
 563
 2,926
 
 3,489
 (762) 6/27/2013 2000

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
SunTrust Bank Ellicott City MD 
 1,728
 931
 
 2,659
 (295) 3/22/2013  1975
SunTrust Bank Waldorf MD 
 523
 2,962
 
 3,485
 (940) 3/22/2013  1964
SunTrust Bank Belmont NC 
 616
 924
 
 1,540
 (293) 3/22/2013  1970
SunTrust Bank Matthews NC 
 382
 382
 
 764
 (121) 3/22/2013  1971
SunTrust Bank Mocksville NC 
 978
 2,933
 
 3,911
 (931) 3/22/2013  2000
SunTrust Bank Raleigh NC 
 658
 658
 
 1,316
 (209) 3/22/2013  1977
SunTrust Bank Chattanooga TN 
 223
 1,263
 
 1,486
 (401) 3/22/2013  1953
SunTrust Bank Madison TN 
 286
 1,143
 
 1,429
 (363) 3/22/2013  1953
SunTrust Bank Cheriton VA 
 90
 510
 
 600
 (162) 3/22/2013  1975
SunTrust Bank Lynchburg VA 
 251
 466
 
 717
 (148) 3/22/2013  1973
SunTrust Bank Richmond VA 
 277
 416
 
 693
 (132) 3/22/2013  1959
Dollar General DeSoto IL 
 138
 784
 
 922
 (260) 3/26/2013  2013
Dollar General Mission TX 
 158
 894
 
 1,052
 (296) 3/27/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lovelady TX 
 82
 740
 
 822
 (245) 3/27/2013  2012
DaVita Dialysis Osceola AR 
 137
 1,232
 
 1,369
 (354) 3/28/2013  2009
Kohl's Howell MI 7,705
 547
 10,399
 
 10,946
 (4,105) 3/28/2013  2003
Kum & Go Waukee IA 
 1,280
 1,280
 
 2,560
 (424) 3/28/2013  2012
Dollar General Presidio TX 
 72
 1,370
 
 1,442
 (454) 3/28/2013  2013
DaVita Dialysis Cincinnati OH 
 219
 878
 55
 1,152
 (258) 3/28/2013  2008
DaVita Dialysis Georgetown OH 
 125
 706
 (1) 830
 (202) 3/28/2013  2009
Mattress Firm Spokane WA 
 511
 1,582
 
 2,093
 (538) 3/28/2013  2013
Qdoba Mexican Grill Flint MI 
 110
 990
 
 1,100
 (403) 3/29/2013  2006
Qdoba Mexican Grill Grand Blanc MI 
 165
 935
 
 1,100
 (380) 3/29/2013  2006
Vacant Wilmington NC 
 412
 1,257
 (831) 838
 
 3/29/2013  2013
Walgreens Las Piedras PR 5,293
 1,726
 5,179
 
 6,905
 (1,819) 4/3/2013  2012
Mattress Firm Spokane WA 
 409
 1,685
 
 2,094
 (567) 4/4/2013  2013
Hy-Vee Vermillion SD 2,922
 409
 3,684
 
 4,093
 (1,447) 4/8/2013  1986
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kimberly ID 
 219
 657
 
 876
 (216) 4/10/2013  2013
CVS St. Cloud FL 2,626
 1,534
 1,875
 79
 3,488
 (662) 4/12/2013  2002
SunTrust Bank Coral Springs FL 
 654
 1,525
 
 2,179
 (481) 4/12/2013  1996
SunTrust Bank Destin FL 
 572
 1,717
 
 2,289
 (541) 4/12/2013  1998
Osceola Regional Medical Ctr. Kissimmee FL 
 1,167
 778
 (1,084) 861
 (13) 4/12/2013  1981
SunTrust Bank Lakeland FL 
 598
 1,110
 
 1,708
 (350) 4/12/2013  1988

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Applebee's Edinburg TX 
 898
 2,058
 
 2,956
 (536) 6/27/2013 2006
Applebee's Mcallen TX 
 1,114
 1,988
 
 3,102
 (518) 6/27/2013 1993
Applebee's New Braunfels TX 
 566
 1,486
 
 2,052
 (387) 6/27/2013 1995
Applebee's San Antonio TX 
 732
 1,796
 
 2,528
 (468) 6/27/2013 2003
Applebee's Tyler TX 
 696
 2,904
 
 3,600
 (660) 2/7/2014 1990
Applebee's Norton VA 
 848
 433
 
 1,281
 (236) 2/7/2014 2006
Applebee's Wytheville VA 
 564
 923
 
 1,487
 (307) 2/7/2014 2000
Applebee's Richland WA 
 1,112
 2,064
 
 3,176
 (548) 7/31/2013 2003
Applebee's Vancouver WA 
 791
 1,846
 
 2,637
 (481) 8/30/2013 2001
Applebee's Vancouver WA 
 718
 1,675
 
 2,393
 (444) 7/31/2013 2001
Apria Healthcare Indianapolis IN 
 981
 3,922
 423
 5,326
 (785) 5/19/2014 1993
Arby's Alexander City AL 
 527
 401
 
 928
 (101) 6/27/2013 1999
Arby's Arab AL 
 40
 887
 
 927
 (219) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Guntersville AL 
 142
 503
 
 645
 (127) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Hampton Cove AL 
 310
 986
 
 1,296
 (244) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Bullhead City AZ 
 550
 
 
 550
 
 6/27/2013 1999
Arby's Phoenix AZ 
 559
 618
 
 1,177
 (155) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Arvada CO 
 190
 1,465
 
 1,655
 (362) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Apopka FL 
 464
 697
 
 1,161
 (164) 7/31/2013 1985
Arby's Merritt Island FL 
 297
 552
 
 849
 (130) 7/31/2013 1984
Arby's Orange Park FL 
 420
 1,256
 
 1,676
 (310) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Orlando FL 
 251
 585
 
 836
 (138) 7/31/2013 1985
Arby's Rockledge FL 
 381
 571
 
 952
 (134) 7/31/2013 1984
Arby's Atlanta GA 
 1,207
 987
 
 2,194
 (232) 7/31/2013 1984
Arby's Canton GA 
 370
 1,200
 
 1,570
 (297) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Douglasville GA 
 370
 1,692
 
 2,062
 (418) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Kennesaw GA 
 583
 840
 
 1,423
 (211) 6/27/2013 1984
Arby's Richmond Hill GA 
 430
 755
 
 1,185
 (190) 6/27/2013 1984
Arby's Savannah GA 
 293
 293
 
 586
 (69) 7/31/2013 1985
Arby's Suwanee GA 
 370
 1,561
 
 1,931
 (386) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Mount Vernon IL 
 911
 764
 
 1,675
 (192) 6/27/2013 1999
Arby's Avon IN 
 500
 812
 
 1,312
 (201) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Vacant Melbourne FL 
 464
 1,392
 (1,131) 725
 (14) 4/12/2013  1987
SunTrust Bank Palm Harbor FL 
 535
 1,249
 
 1,784
 (393) 4/12/2013  1994
SunTrust Bank S. Daytona Beach FL 
 592
 1,099
 
 1,691
 (346) 4/12/2013  1985
SunTrust Bank Atlanta GA 
 1,018
 1,527
 
 2,545
 (481) 4/12/2013  1965
SunTrust Bank Atlanta GA 
 1,435
 478
 
 1,913
 (151) 4/12/2013  1970
SunTrust Bank Carrboro NC 
 512
 512
 
 1,024
 (161) 4/12/2013  1980
SunTrust Bank Concord NC 
 707
 707
 
 1,414
 (223) 4/12/2013  1988
SunTrust Bank Durham NC 
 747
 1,388
 
 2,135
 (437) 4/12/2013  1973
SunTrust Bank Greensboro NC 
 403
 748
 
 1,151
 (236) 4/12/2013  1962
SunTrust Bank Lexington NC 
 447
 831
 
 1,278
 (262) 4/12/2013  2001
SunTrust Bank Nashville TN 
 1,598
 1,308
 
 2,906
 (412) 4/12/2013  1992
SunTrust Bank Nashville TN 
 613
 613
 
 1,226
 (193) 4/12/2013  1970
Vacant Norfolk VA 
 656
 437
 3
 1,096
 (138) 4/12/2013  1990
SunTrust Bank Petersburg VA 
 102
 306
 
 408
 (96) 4/12/2013  1975
SunTrust Bank Richmond VA 
 224
 2,012
 
 2,236
 (634) 4/12/2013  1909
Advance Auto Parts Barbourville KY 
 194
 1,098
 
 1,292
 (361) 4/15/2013  2006
Advance Auto Parts West Liberty KY 
 249
 996
 
 1,245
 (328) 4/15/2013  2006
Advance Auto Parts Manistee MI 
 348
 1,043
 
 1,391
 (343) 4/15/2013  2007
Tractor Supply Oneonta AL 
 359
 1,438
 57
 1,854
 (427) 4/18/2013  1983
FedEx Des Moines IA 
 733
 1,361
 183
 2,277
 (523) 4/18/2013  1986
The Vitamin Shoppe Evergreen Park IL 
 476
 1,427
 
 1,903
 (469) 4/19/2013  2012
Krystal Huntsville AL 
 348
 811
 
 1,159
 (328) 4/23/2013  1960
Krystal Huntsville AL 
 352
 654
 125
 1,131
 (284) 4/23/2013  1971
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 303
 562
 (570) 295
 
 4/23/2013  1962
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 502
 613
 
 1,115
 (248) 4/23/2013  1962
Krystal Valley AL 
 297
 694
 125
 1,116
 (298) 4/23/2013  1979
Krystal Vestavia Hills AL 
 342
 513
 
 855
 (207) 4/23/2013  1995
Krystal Corinth MS 
 279
 652
 125
 1,056
 (282) 4/23/2013  2007
Krystal Chattanooga TN 
 440
 659
 
 1,099
 (266) 4/23/2013  1983
Krystal Lawrenceburg TN 
 304
 709
 
 1,013
 (286) 4/23/2013  1980
Krystal Memphis TN 
 257
 1,029
 
 1,286
 (416) 4/23/2013  1975
Krystal Memphis TN 
 181
 723
 
 904
 (292) 4/23/2013  1972
Krystal Murfreesboro TN 
 465
 698
 
 1,163
 (282) 4/23/2013  2008

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Arby's Fort Wayne IN 
 529
 647
 
 1,176
 (152) 7/31/2013 1987
Arby's Indianapolis IN 
 530
 1,236
 
 1,766
 (305) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Indianapolis IN 
 370
 1,130
 
 1,500
 (279) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's New Albany IN 
 456
 470
 
 926
 (118) 6/27/2013 2005
Arby's New Albany IN 
 325
 465
 
 790
 (117) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Scottsburg IN 
 526
 445
 
 971
 (112) 6/27/2013 1989
Arby's Winchester IN 
 341
 511
 
 852
 (120) 7/31/2013 1988
Arby's Kansas City KS 
 280
 364
 
 644
 (90) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Salina KS 
 540
 300
 
 840
 (74) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Topeka KS 
 270
 433
 
 703
 (107) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Hopkinsville KY 
 432
 528
 
 960
 (124) 7/31/2013 1985
Arby's Louisville KY 
 336
 625
 
 961
 (204) 5/30/2013 1979
Arby's Alma MI 
 380
 408
 
 788
 (101) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Chesterfield MI 
 210
 841
 
 1,051
 (208) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Davison MI 
 420
 631
 
 1,051
 (156) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Flint MI 
 110
 1,422
 
 1,532
 (351) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Flint MI 
 230
 1,428
 
 1,658
 (353) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Grandville MI 
 1,133
 755
 
 1,888
 (178) 7/31/2013 1982
Arby's Midland MI 
 340
 753
 
 1,093
 (186) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Port Huron MI 
 210
 868
 
 1,078
 (214) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Saginaw MI 
 310
 1,110
 
 1,420
 (274) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's South Haven MI 
 260
 573
 
 833
 (142) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Walker MI 
 360
 1,002
 
 1,362
 (247) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Waterford MI 
 180
 962
 
 1,142
 (238) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Wyoming MI 
 1,513
 648
 
 2,161
 (152) 7/31/2013 1970
Arby's Corinth MS 
 753
 429
 
 1,182
 (108) 6/27/2013 1984
Arby's Fayetteville NC 
 420
 2,001
 
 2,421
 (494) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Jonesville NC 
 350
 908
 
 1,258
 (224) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Kernersville NC 
 280
 774
 
 1,054
 (191) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Rochester NY 
 128
 384
 (262) 250
 
 7/31/2013 1985
Arby's Columbus OH 
 400
 1,155
 
 1,555
 (285) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Willard OH 
 230
 599
 
 829
 (148) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Towanda PA 
 
 877
 
 877
 (308) 4/24/2013  2003
Advance Auto Parts Opelika AL 
 289
 1,156
 
 1,445
 (380) 4/24/2013  2013
Bi-Lo, LLC Jacksonville FL 63,240
 4,360
 82,834
 1
 87,195
 (23,740) 4/24/2013  2000
Vacant Bowling Green KY 
 648
 973
 
 1,621
 (320) 4/25/2013  2012
Dollar General Lonedell MO 
 208
 833
 
 1,041
 (274) 4/26/2013  2013
SunTrust Bank Frederick MD 
 991
 991
 
 1,982
 (312) 4/26/2013  1880
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hoosick Falls NY 
 181
 724
 
 905
 (238) 4/26/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Rushville NE 
 125
 499
 
 624
 (164) 4/26/2013  2007
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 
 174
 696
 
 870
 (229) 4/26/2013  1985
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 215
 1,219
 
 1,434
 (401) 4/30/2013  1995
Advance Auto Parts Salina KS 
 195
 782
 
 977
 (257) 4/30/2013  2006
Walgreens Las Vegas NV 
 700
 2,801
 
 3,501
 (984) 4/30/2013  2001
AutoZone Chicago IL 
 698
 1,047
 
 1,745
 (344) 4/30/2013  2008
Fresenius Medical Care Albemarle NC 
 139
 1,253
 
 1,392
 (357) 4/30/2013  2008
Fresenius Medical Care Angiers NC 
 203
 1,152
 
 1,355
 (328) 4/30/2013  2012
Fresenius Medical Care Asheboro NC 2,373
 323
 2,903
 
 3,226
 (826) 4/30/2013  2012
Fresenius Medical Care Taylorsville NC 
 275
 1,099
 
 1,374
 (313) 4/30/2013  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Detroit MI 
 106
 956
 123
 1,185
 (314) 5/2/2013  1964
Mattress Firm Lafayette LA 1,194
 
 1,251
 
 1,251
 (409) 5/2/2013  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Torrington WY 
 72
 645
 
 717
 (211) 5/9/2013  2007
Omnipoint Communications Indianapolis IN 49,838
 5,770
 64,073
 4,614
 74,457
 (20,195) 5/9/2013  2000
Monro Muffler Lewiston ME 
 279
 1,115
 
 1,394
 (389) 5/10/2013  1976
Mattress Firm Tallahassee FL 
 924
 1,386
 56
 2,366
 (454) 5/14/2013  2013
Mattress Firm Dothan AL 
 406
 1,217
 
 1,623
 (398) 5/14/2013  2013
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 148
 841
 
 989
 (275) 5/16/2013  2013
CVS Hardy VA 
 686
 2,059
 
 2,745
 (718) 5/16/2013  2005
Talbots Lakeville MA 22,509
 6,302
 25,209
 
 31,511
 (9,204) 5/17/2013  1987
Advance Auto Parts Rayne LA 
 122
 490
 84
 696
 (166) 5/21/2013  2000
Citizens Bank Glenside PA 1,257
 343
 1,370
 
 1,713
 (429) 5/22/2013  1958
Dollar General Shelbina MO 
 101
 911
 
 1,012
 (298) 5/22/2013  2013
SunTrust Bank Rocky Mount VA 
 265
 1,504
 
 1,769
 (470) 5/22/2013  1961
Dollar General Henry IL 
 104
 934
 
 1,038
 (305) 5/23/2013  2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 271
 812
 
 1,083
 (265) 5/23/2013  2013

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Arby's Allentown PA 
 600
 1,652
 
 2,252
 (408) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Carlisle PA 
 200
 472
 
 672
 (117) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Erie PA 
 188
 552
 (470) 270
 
 6/27/2013 1966
Arby's Hanover PA 
 400
 921
 
 1,321
 (228) 6/27/2013 1995
Arby's Chattanooga TN 
 201
 469
 
 670
 (110) 7/31/2013 1998
Arby's Memphis TN 
 449
 835
 
 1,284
 (196) 7/31/2013 1998
Arby's Amarillo TX 
 260
 627
 
 887
 (155) 6/27/2013 1995
Art Van Furniture Avon OH 
 925
 10,031
 
 10,956
 (37) 11/22/2017 2016
Art Van Furniture Mentor OH 
 1,090
 9,582
 
 10,672
 (35) 11/22/2017 2009
Art Van Furniture Middleburg Heights OH 
 1,440
 5,529
 
 6,969
 (20) 11/22/2017 1973
Art Van Furniture North Canton OH 
 545
 8,636
 
 9,181
 (32) 11/22/2017 2007
Art Van Furniture Hanover PA 
 703
 4,108
 
 4,811
 (15) 11/22/2017 1996
Art Van Furniture Johnstown PA 
 386
 2,582
 
 2,968
 (10) 11/22/2017 1969
Art Van Furniture Lancaster PA 
 2,156
 6,030
 
 8,186
 (7) 11/22/2017 1978
Ashley Furniture Jeffersontown KY 
 1,966
 2,368
 
 4,334
 (450) 9/26/2014 1970
At Home Stockbridge GA 
 2,057
 8,967
 
 11,024
 (1,900) 2/7/2014 1998
At Home & Gabes Florence KY 
 6,794
 5,968
 
 12,762
 (372) 12/14/2016 1992
AT&T Schaumburg IL 
 2,364
 9,305
 548
 12,217
 (1,813) 9/24/2014 1989
AT&T Richardson TX 11,123
 1,891
 31,118
 714
 33,723
 (6,484) 11/5/2013 1986
Auto Pawn Columbus GA 
 170
 
 
 170
 
 6/27/2013 1987
AutoZone Chicago IL 
 698
 1,047
 
 1,745
 (277) 4/30/2013 1995
AutoZone Yorkville IL 
 383
 1,534
 
 1,917
 (321) 5/19/2014 2006
AutoZone Pearl River LA 719
 239
 1,193
 
 1,432
 (248) 2/7/2014 2007
AutoZone Hernando MS 
 141
 833
 
 974
 (154) 2/7/2014 2003
AutoZone Blanchester OH 535
 341
 838
 
 1,179
 (172) 2/7/2014 2008
AutoZone Hamilton OH 814
 507
 1,283
 
 1,790
 (259) 2/7/2014 2008
AutoZone Hartville OH 614
 197
 1,156
 
 1,353
 (236) 2/7/2014 2008
AutoZone Mt. Orab OH 679
 258
 1,219
 
 1,477
 (244) 2/7/2014 2009
AutoZone Trenton OH 504
 306
 812
 
 1,118
 (165) 2/7/2014 2008
AutoZone Rapid City SD 571
 375
 969
 
 1,344
 (191) 2/7/2014 2008
AutoZone Nashville TN 861
 555
 1,270
 
 1,825
 (256) 2/7/2014 2009
Bahama Breeze Pittsburgh PA 
 1,590
 1,753
 
 3,343
 (218) 7/28/2014 2004
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Talbots Hingham MA 23,362
 3,009
 27,080
 
 30,089
 (7,864) 5/24/2013  1980
DaVita Dialysis Hiawatha KS 
 69
 1,302
 
 1,371
 (367) 5/30/2013  2012
DaVita Dialysis Hartsville SC 
 126
 1,136
 
 1,262
 (321) 5/30/2013  2013
Arby's Louisville KY 
 336
 625
 
 961
 (251) 5/30/2013  1979
Dollar General Berea KY 
 138
 781
 
 919
 (255) 5/30/2013  2012
Dollar General Coldiron KY 
 187
 747
 
 934
 (244) 5/30/2013  2013
Dollar General East Bernstadt KY 
 141
 799
 
 940
 (261) 5/30/2013  2012
Dollar General Eubank KY 
 137
 775
 
 912
 (253) 5/30/2013  2013
Dollar General Whitesburg KY 
 211
 845
 
 1,056
 (276) 5/30/2013  2012
Walgreens Akron OH 
 664
 1,548
 72
 2,284
 (544) 5/31/2013  1994
FedEx Port Huron MI 
 125
 1,121
 
 1,246
 (409) 5/31/2013  2003
CVS Hoover AL 
 1,239
 2,890
 84
 4,213
 (1,011) 5/31/2013  2003
Bridgestone Tire Kansas CIty MO 
 651
 1,954
 
 2,605
 (681) 5/31/2013  2008
Advance Auto Parts Selinsgrove PA 
 99
 891
 67
 1,057
 (290) 6/3/2013  2003
Lowe's Windham ME 7,930
 12,640
 
 
 12,640
 
 6/3/2013  2006
Dollar General Guyton GA 
 213
 852
 
 1,065
 (276) 6/3/2013  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Middleburg FL 
 274
 822
 
 1,096
 (266) 6/4/2013  2008
DNU Ormond Beach FL 
 573
 860
 
 1,433
 (279) 6/4/2013  2008
Advance Auto Parts Clinton IN 
 182
 729
 
 911
 (236) 6/5/2013  2004
Key Bank Spencerport NY 
 59
 1,112
 
 1,171
 (345) 6/5/2013  1960
DaVita Dialysis Palatka FL 
 207
 1,173
 
 1,380
 (328) 6/5/2013  2013
Mattress Firm Destin FL 
 693
 1,287
 
 1,980
 (417) 6/5/2013  2013
Dollar General Fairbury IL 
 96
 867
 
 963
 (281) 6/7/2013  2013
Krystal Huntsville AL 
 305
 712
 125
 1,142
 (303) 6/10/2013  1985
Dollar General Moody TX 
 41
 781
 
 822
 (253) 6/11/2013  2013
Advance Auto Parts Eaton OH 
 157
 471
 
 628
 (153) 6/13/2013  1987
Advance Auto Parts Van Wert OH 
 33
 630
 
 663
 (204) 6/13/2013  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Custer SD 
 32
 617
 
 649
 (200) 6/14/2013  2006
Applebee's Rockford IL 
 
 
 2,110
 2,110
 (52) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Arab AL 
 40
 887
 
 927
 (292) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Orange Park FL 
 420
 1,256
 
 1,676
 (413) 6/27/2013  1995



F-84


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Arby's Canton GA 
 370
 1,200
 
 1,570
 (395) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Suwanee GA 
 370
 1,561
 
 1,931
 (513) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Avon IN 
 500
 812
 
 1,312
 (267) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Jonesville NC 
 350
 908
 
 1,258
 (299) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Kernersville NC 
 280
 774
 
 1,054
 (255) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Columbus OH 
 400
 1,155
 
 1,555
 (380) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Chattanooga TN 
 740
 1,591
 
 2,331
 (523) 6/27/2013  1995
Chevy's Greenbelt MD 
 530
 2,399
 
 2,929
 (797) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Lake Oswego OR 
 590
 1,693
 
 2,283
 (563) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Topeka KS 
 630
 446
 
 1,076
 (148) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Mooresville NC 
 250
 841
 
 1,091
 (279) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Greenville SC 
 570
 554
 
 1,124
 (184) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Homewood AL 
 610
 1,762
 
 2,372
 (585) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Greeley CO 
 120
 1,538
 
 1,658
 (511) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Loveland CO 
 181
 1,534
 
 1,715
 (173) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Pueblo CO 
 330
 1,589
 
 1,919
 (528) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Roseville MI 
 340
 1,071
 125
 1,536
 (370) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Kansas CIty MO 
 630
 1,002
 
 1,632
 (333) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Anderson SC 
 
 
 1
 1
 
 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Greenville SC 
 610
 1,551
 
 2,161
 (516) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Clarksville TN 
 530
 1,346
 
 1,876
 (447) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Murfreesboro TN 
 600
 1,687
 
 2,287
 (561) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Houston TX 
 760
 2,462
 
 3,222
 (818) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Killeen TX 
 380
 1,028
 
 1,408
 (342) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Lake Jackson TX 
 370
 2,018
 
 2,388
 (671) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Avondale AZ 
 110
 2,237
 
 2,347
 (735) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Chandler AZ 
 450
 1,447
 
 1,897
 (476) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Folsom CA 
 280
 2,423
 
 2,703
 (797) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box West Sacramento CA 
 590
 1,710
 
 2,300
 (562) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Florissant MO 
 502
 1,515
 
 2,017
 (498) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box St. Louis MO 
 420
 1,494
 
 1,914
 (491) 6/27/2013  1995
Starbucks Las Vegas NV 
 680
 1,533
 150
 2,363
 (525) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Salem OR 
 580
 1,301
 
 1,881
 (428) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bahama Breeze Memphis TN 
 2,370
 1,313
 
 3,683
 (140) 7/28/2014 1998
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant Collinsville IL 
 340
 627
 
 967
 (160) 6/27/2013 1995
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant Arnold MO 
 460
 433
 
 893
 (111) 6/27/2013 1995
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant Fenton MO 
 470
 314
 
 784
 (82) 8/30/2013 1986

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Jack in the Box Tigard OR 
 620
 1,361
 
 1,981
 (447) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Georgetown TX 
 600
 1,508
 
 2,108
 (496) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Granbury TX 
 380
 1,449
 
 1,829
 (476) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Gun Barrel City TX 
 300
 961
 (866) 395
 (39) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Hutchins TX 
 330
 1,363
 
 1,693
 (448) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Lufkin TX 
 440
 1,544
 
 1,984
 (507) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Lufkin TX 
 450
 1,563
 
 2,013
 (514) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Orange TX 
 270
 1,661
 
 1,931
 (546) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box San Antonio TX 
 400
 1,244
 
 1,644
 (409) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box San Antonio TX 
 470
 1,256
 
 1,726
 (413) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Tyler TX 
 450
 1,025
 
 1,475
 (337) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Weatherford TX 
 480
 1,329
 
 1,809
 (437) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Enumclaw WA 
 380
 1,238
 
 1,618
 (407) 6/27/2013  1995
Ker's WingHouse Bar and Grill Brandon FL 
 340
 654
 
 994
 (217) 6/27/2013  1995
Ker's WingHouse Bar and Grill Clearwater FL 
 550
 627
 
 1,177
 (208) 6/27/2013  1995
Leeann Chin Chanhassen MN 
 450
 763
 
 1,213
 (251) 6/27/2013  1995
Leeann Chin Golden Valley MN 
 270
 776
 
 1,046
 (255) 6/27/2013  1995
Popeyes Starke FL 
 380
 
 614
 994
 (72) 6/27/2013  1995
Popeyes Thomasville GA 
 110
 705
 
 815
 (232) 6/27/2013  1995
Popeyes Valdosta GA 
 240
 599
 
 839
 (197) 6/27/2013  1995
Black Bear DIner Colorado Springs CO 
 480
 809
 
 1,289
 (269) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Dillon CO 
 400
 1,628
 
 2,028
 (541) 6/27/2013  1995
Ruby Tuesday Bartow FL 
 270
 1,916
 
 2,186
 (637) 6/27/2013  1995
Ruby Tuesday Somerset KY 
 480
 1,120
 
 1,600
 (372) 6/27/2013  1995
Smokey Bones Morrow GA 
 390
 2,184
 
 2,574
 (726) 6/27/2013  1995
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Athens GA 
 460
 1,280
 
 1,740
 (425) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Livingston TN 
 300
 775
 63
 1,138
 (57) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Dallas TX 
 400
 1,225
 
 1,625
 (403) 6/27/2013  1995
TCF Bank Crystal MN 
 640
 642
 
 1,282
 (198) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Ammon ID 
 490
 1,206
 
 1,696
 (401) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Gastonia NC 
 570
 1,544
 
 2,114
 (513) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Hickory NC 
 580
 1,831
 
 2,411
 (609) 6/27/2013  1995
Tilted Kilt Hendersonville TN 
 310
 763
 
 1,073
 (253) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bank of America Merced CA 
 512
 2,195
 212
 2,919
 (514) 1/8/2014 1980
Bank of America Asheville NC 
 383
 195
 
 578
 (45) 1/8/2014 1993
Bank of America Charlotte NC 
 62
 642
 
 704
 (145) 1/8/2014 1983
Banner Life Insurance Urbana MD 19,600
 2,733
 31,483
 
 34,216
 (5,661) 2/7/2014 2011
Beall's Lakeland FL 
 2,033
 4,809
 18
 6,860
 (878) 7/16/2014 2006
Becton, Dickinson and Company San Antonio TX 9,313
 1,666
 19,092
 71
 20,829
 (3,845) 11/5/2013 2008
Bed Bath & Beyond Stockton CA 40,278
 2,761
 52,454
 
 55,215
 (16,726) 8/17/2012 2003
Bed Bath & Beyond Windsor VA 
 3,032
 59,649
 
 62,681
 (63) 12/20/2017 2001
Benihana Anchorage AK 
 1,391
 1,877
 
 3,268
 (460) 2/7/2014 1998
Benihana Miami Beach FL 
 3,775
 433
 
 4,208
 (158) 2/7/2014 1972
Benihana Stuart FL 
 1,661
 1,917
 
 3,578
 (489) 2/7/2014 1976
Benihana Alpharetta GA 
 1,151
 1,485
 
 2,636
 (180) 2/7/2014 2003
Benihana Schaumburg IL 
 2,319
 1,396
 
 3,715
 (357) 2/7/2014 1992
Benihana Wheeling IL 
 1,896
 1,273
 
 3,169
 (205) 2/7/2014 2001
Benihana Farmington Hills MI 
 2,025
 2,049
 
 4,074
 (575) 2/7/2014 2012
Benihana Maple Grove MN 
 1,319
 2,604
 
 3,923
 (631) 2/7/2014 2006
Benihana Dallas TX 
 2,988
 1,275
 
 4,263
 (368) 2/7/2014 1975
Best Buy Montgomery AL 3,148
 1,370
 5,749
 
 7,119
 (1,258) 2/7/2014 2003
Best Buy Coral Springs FL 
 2,715
 4,843
 
 7,558
 (1,166) 2/7/2014 1993
Best Buy Bourbonnais IL 
 1,724
 5,156
 
 6,880
 (1,245) 2/7/2014 1991
Best Buy Indianapolis IN 
 665
 4,775
 
 5,440
 (1,009) 2/7/2014 2009
Best Buy Richmond IN 
 549
 4,429
 
 4,978
 (958) 2/7/2014 2011
Best Buy Marquette MI 
 836
 4,207
 593
 5,636
 (1,067) 2/7/2014 2010
Best Buy Norton Shores MI 
 1,568
 4,099
 
 5,667
 (865) 2/7/2014 2001
Best Buy Southaven MS 
 2,045
 4,318
 
 6,363
 (983) 2/7/2014 2007
Best Buy Tupelo MS 
 484
 1,934
 
 2,418
 (393) 5/19/2014 2005
Best Buy Pineville NC 
 1,818
 7,970
 
 9,788
 (1,687) 2/7/2014 1994
Best Buy Findlay OH 
 3,313
 37,568
 2,346
 43,227
 (903) 2/15/2017 1996
Best Buy Kenosha WI 
 1,925
 5,503
 
 7,428
 (1,162) 2/7/2014 2008
BHC Marketing The Woodlands TX 
 4,724
 40,332
 
 45,056
 (7,944) 11/5/2013 2009
Big Lots Chester VA 
 335
 3,373
 169
 3,877
 (805) 2/24/2014 2013
Big O Tires Phoenix AZ 782
 206
 1,367
 
 1,573
 (265) 2/7/2014 2010

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements ��  Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Camarillo CA 
 320
 2,253
 
 2,573
 (741) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Knoxville TN 
 330
 1,161
 
 1,491
 (382) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Knoxville TN 
 330
 1,132
 
 1,462
 (372) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Douglasville GA 
 370
 1,692
 
 2,062
 (556) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Indianapolis IN 
 530
 1,236
 
 1,766
 (406) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Grand Rapids MI 
 230
 1,289
 
 1,519
 (94) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Walker MI 
 360
 1,002
 
 1,362
 (329) 6/27/2013  1995
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant Collinsville IL 
 340
 627
 
 967
 (209) 6/27/2013  1995
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant Arnold MO 
 460
 433
 
 893
 (144) 6/27/2013  1995
Black Angus Dublin CA 
 620
 2,467
 
 3,087
 (820) 6/27/2013  1995
Boston Market Indianapolis IN 
 410
 1,070
 
 1,480
 (352) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Henderson KY 
 600
 1,586
 
 2,186
 (527) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Flowood MS 
 680
 2,730
 
 3,410
 (907) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Bellevue NE 
 520
 1,433
 
 1,953
 (476) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Tulsa OK 
 280
 3,890
 
 4,170
 (1,293) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Rock Hill SC 
 320
 2,130
 
 2,450
 (708) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Castle Rock CO 
 320
 2,334
 
 2,654
 (776) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Southaven MS 
 350
 2,108
 
 2,458
 (701) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Leon Valley TX 
 650
 2,055
 
 2,705
 (885) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Auburn WA 
 780
 1,878
 
 2,658
 (624) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Corinth TX 
 400
 1,416
 
 1,816
 (465) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Nacogdoches TX 
 340
 1,320
 
 1,660
 (434) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Spring TX 
 570
 1,340
 
 1,910
 (441) 6/27/2013  1995
Krystal Greenville AL 
 195
 1,147
 181
 1,523
 (452) 6/27/2013  1995
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 560
 829
 175
 1,564
 (344) 6/27/2013  1995
Krystal Scottsboro AL 
 20
 1,157
 (798) 379
 (154) 6/27/2013  1995
Krystal Chattanooga TN 
 186
 328
 
 514
 (88) 6/27/2013  1995
Longhorn Steakhouse Tampa FL 
 370
 1,852
 
 2,222
 (616) 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cooper City FL 
 320
 466
 
 786
 (155) 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Marathon FL 
 530
 187
 
 717
 (62) 6/27/2013  1995
Pollo Tropical Davie FL 
 280
 1,490
 
 1,770
 (490) 6/27/2013  1995
Pollo Tropical Fort Lauderdale FL 
 190
 1,242
 
 1,432
 (408) 6/27/2013  1995
Pollo Tropical Lake Worth FL 
 280
 1,182
 
 1,462
 (389) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Big O Tires Los Lunas NM 
 316
 1,265
 
 1,581
 (392) 6/1/2012 2006
Bi-Lo's Grocery Greenwood SC 
 533
 4,212
 
 4,745
 (898) 2/7/2014 1999
Bi-Lo's Grocery Mt Pleasant SC 
 4,093
 8,594
 
 12,687
 (1,845) 2/7/2014 2003
BJ's Wholesale Club Boynton Beach FL 
 5,569
 10,931
 (15) 16,485
 (2,220) 2/7/2014 2001
BJ's Wholesale Club Jacksonville FL 
 5,929
 16,348
 
 22,277
 (2,903) 2/7/2014 2003
BJ's Wholesale Club Pembroke Pines FL 8,446
 5,104
 7,661
 
 12,765
 (1,614) 2/7/2014 1997
BJ's Wholesale Club Greenfield MA 8,416
 2,168
 14,002
 
 16,170
 (2,383) 2/7/2014 1997
BJ's Wholesale Club Leominster MA 
 3,585
 21,344
 
 24,929
 (3,609) 2/7/2014 1993
BJ's Wholesale Club Uxbridge MA 12,645
 5,538
 36,445
 
 41,983
 (5,686) 2/7/2014 2006
BJ's Wholesale Club California MD 
 6,882
 10,196
 
 17,078
 (2,027) 2/7/2014 2003
BJ's Wholesale Club Westminster MD 13,978
 6,516
 13,860
 
 20,376
 (2,724) 2/7/2014 2001
BJ's Wholesale Club Auburn ME 
 2,674
 16,510
 
 19,184
 (2,707) 2/7/2014 1995
BJ's Wholesale Club Portsmouth NH 
 4,216
 25,454
 
 29,670
 (4,163) 2/7/2014 1993
BJ's Wholesale Club Deptford NJ 11,004
 6,558
 12,490
 
 19,048
 (2,202) 2/7/2014 1995
BJ's Wholesale Club North Canton OH 6,787
 456
 8,668
 422
 9,546
 (2,989) 2/20/2013 1998
BJ's Wholesale Club Lancaster PA 13,621
 3,400
 16,782
 
 20,182
 (3,182) 2/7/2014 1996
Black Angus Dublin CA 
 620
 2,467
 
 3,087
 (631) 6/27/2013 1995
Black Bear Diner Colorado Springs CO 
 480
 809
 
 1,289
 (207) 6/27/2013 1995
Black Meg 43 Copperas Cove TX 
 151
 151
 (106) 196
 
 6/27/2013 1979
Blue Goose Cantina Mexican Grapevine TX 
 572
 868
 
 1,440
 (226) 6/27/2013 1999
Bob Evans Newark DE 
 869
 810
 
 1,679
 (13) 6/26/2017 1996
Bob Evans East Peoria IL 
 717
 1,142
 
 1,859
 (21) 6/26/2017 1993
Bob Evans Indianapolis IN 
 430
 708
 
 1,138
 (13) 6/26/2017 2002
Bob Evans Jackson MI 
 980
 1,305
 
 2,285
 (22) 6/26/2017 2005
Bob Evans Muskegon MI 
 550
 860
 
 1,410
 (15) 6/26/2017 2001
Bob Evans Amherst OH 
 163
 1,557
 
 1,720
 (27) 6/26/2017 1987
Bob Evans Brunswick OH 
 1,147
 1,088
 
 2,235
 (20) 6/26/2017 1992
Bob Evans Cincinnati OH 
 563
 1,706
 
 2,269
 (32) 6/26/2017 2003
Bob Evans Cincinnati OH 
 601
 1,529
 
 2,130
 (29) 6/26/2017 2002
Bob Evans Lancaster OH 
 626
 1,546
 
 2,172
 (28) 6/26/2017 1998
Bob Evans Lima OH 
 366
 1,631
 
 1,997
 (30) 6/26/2017 2000
Bob Evans Marion OH 
 469
 1,657
 
 2,126
 (30) 6/26/2017 2008

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Marietta GA 
 290
 1,772
 400
 2,462
 (629) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell St. Louis MO 
 190
 1,951
 
 2,141
 (589) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Wentzville MO 
 410
 1,168
 
 1,578
 (384) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Shively KY 
 540
 2,055
 
 2,595
 (683) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Concord NC 
 650
 2,130
 
 2,780
 (708) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse College Station TX 
 670
 2,299
 
 2,969
 (764) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Hampton Cove AL 
 310
 986
 
 1,296
 (324) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Fayetteville NC 
 420
 2,001
 
 2,421
 (658) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Willard OH 
 230
 599
 
 829
 (197) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Grand Rapids MI 
 490
 545
 
 1,035
 (179) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Grand Rapids MI 
 260
 780
 
 1,040
 (256) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Sparta MI 
 640
 570
 
 1,210
 (187) 6/27/2013  1995
Captain D's Southaven MS 
 270
 564
 
 834
 (185) 6/27/2013  1995
Captain D's Memphis TN 
 230
 338
 
 568
 (111) 6/27/2013  1995
Checkers Hollywood FL 
 160
 2,220
 
 2,380
 (738) 6/27/2013  1995
Checkers Lauderhill FL 
 280
 1,951
 
 2,231
 (648) 6/27/2013  1995
Checkers Plantation FL 
 220
 1,461
 
 1,681
 (485) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Watertown NY 
 330
 1,107
 
 1,437
 (368) 6/27/2013  1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Appleton WI 
 350
 874
 
 1,224
 (287) 6/27/2013  1995
Logan's Roadhouse Huntsville AL 
 520
 4,797
 (1,363) 3,954
 (875) 6/27/2013  1995
Logan's Roadhouse Fayetteville AR 
 1,570
 2,182
 (953) 2,799
 (384) 6/27/2013  1995
Logan's Roadhouse Hattiesburg MS 
 890
 4,012
 (804) 4,098
 (814) 6/27/2013  1995
Logan's Roadhouse Clarksville TN 
 1,010
 4,424
 (1,264) 4,170
 (823) 6/27/2013  1995
Logan's Roadhouse Cleveland TN 
 890
 3,902
 (1,225) 3,567
 (704) 6/27/2013  1995
Logan's Roadhouse El Paso TX 
 320
 4,731
 (1,558) 3,493
 (806) 6/27/2013  1995
Rally's Indianapolis IN 
 210
 1,514
 
 1,724
 (498) 6/27/2013  1995
Rally's Kokomo IN 
 290
 548
 
 838
 (180) 6/27/2013  1995
Rally's Muncie IN 
 310
 1,196
 
 1,506
 (393) 6/27/2013  1995
Rally's New Orleans LA 
 450
 1,691
 
 2,141
 (556) 6/27/2013  1995
Rally's New Orleans LA 
 220
 1,018
 
 1,238
 (335) 6/27/2013  1995
Rally's Hamtramck MI 
 230
 1,020
 
 1,250
 (335) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Daphne AL 
 180
 1,278
 (1,038) 420
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Foley AL 
 360
 1,460
 
 1,820
 (480) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bob Evans Medina OH 
 496
 1,050
 
 1,546
 (20) 6/26/2017 2000
Bob Evans Mentor OH 
 626
 929
 
 1,555
 (17) 6/26/2017 1999
Bob Evans Mount Vernon OH 
 343
 1,338
 
 1,681
 (25) 6/26/2017 2011
Bob Evans Stow OH 
 418
 1,416
 
 1,834
 (27) 6/26/2017 2002
Bob Evans Troy OH 
 512
 1,255
 
 1,767
 (23) 6/26/2017 1992
Bob Evans Wapakoneta OH 
 253
 1,479
 
 1,732
 (28) 6/26/2017 2001
Bob Evans Willoughby OH 
 675
 1,262
 
 1,937
 (23) 6/26/2017 2005
Bob Evans Xenia OH 
 337
 1,433
 
 1,770
 (27) 6/26/2017 1988
Bob Evans Phoenixville PA 
 495
 438
 
 933
 (7) 6/26/2017 1999
Bob Evans Wilkes-Barre PA 
 373
 714
 
 1,087
 (12) 6/26/2017 2003
Bob's Stores Randolph MA 
 2,840
 6,826
 
 9,666
 (1,689) 11/5/2013 1965
Bojangles Winder GA 
 645
 1,198
 
 1,843
 (439) 7/30/2012 2011
Bojangles Biscoe NC 
 247
 986
 
 1,233
 (351) 11/29/2012 2010
Bojangles Boone NC 
 278
 833
 
 1,111
 (305) 7/27/2012 1980
Bojangles Denver NC 
 1,013
 1,881
 
 2,894
 (442) 7/31/2013 1997
Bojangles Dobson NC 
 251
 1,004
 
 1,255
 (368) 7/30/2012 2010
Bojangles Hickory NC 
 749
 1,789
 
 2,538
 (450) 6/27/2013 1973
Bojangles Indian Trail NC 
 655
 1,217
 
 1,872
 (445) 7/27/2012 2011
Bojangles Morganton NC 
 566
 1,321
 
 1,887
 (484) 7/27/2012 2010
Bojangles Roanoke Rapids NC 
 442
 1,032
 
 1,474
 (378) 7/27/2012 2011
Bojangles Southport NC 
 505
 1,179
 
 1,684
 (431) 7/30/2012 2011
Bojangles Statesville NC 
 646
 1,937
 
 2,583
 (456) 7/31/2013 1988
Bojangles Taylorsville NC 
 436
 1,108
 
 1,544
 (279) 6/27/2013 1987
Bojangles Troutman NC 
 718
 1,077
 
 1,795
 (319) 10/10/2013 2012
Bojangles Chapin SC 
 577
 1,071
 
 1,648
 (389) 8/9/2012 2009
Bojangles Clinton SC 
 397
 926
 
 1,323
 (339) 7/27/2012 2009
Bojangles Fountain Inn SC 
 287
 1,150
 
 1,437
 (341) 10/10/2013 2012
Bojangles Greenwood SC 
 440
 1,320
 
 1,760
 (453) 2/28/2013 1995
Bojangles Moncks Corner SC 
 505
 1,179
 
 1,684
 (420) 11/29/2012 2010
Bojangles Walterboro SC 
 454
 1,363
 
 1,817
 (485) 11/29/2012 2010
Bonefish Grill Lakeland FL 
 750
 1,897
 
 2,647
 (446) 2/7/2014 2003
Bonefish Grill Independence OH 
 895
 2,252
 
 3,147
 (549) 2/7/2014 2006

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Taco Bell Mobile AL 
 160
 1,973
 
 2,133
 (648) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell SaraLand AL 
 150
 1,063
 
 1,213
 (350) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Jacksonville FL 
 440
 1,167
 (1,020) 587
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Jacksonville FL 
 340
 1,383
 
 1,723
 (455) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Pensacola FL 
 140
 1,897
 (1,424) 613
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Augusta GA 
 220
 1,292
 
 1,512
 (425) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Hephzibah GA 
 330
 930
 (977) 283
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Jesup GA 
 230
 715
 
 945
 (235) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Waycross GA 
 170
 1,115
 
 1,285
 (366) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Brunswick OH 
 400
 1,267
 
 1,667
 (416) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell North Olmstead OH 
 390
 904
 
 1,294
 (297) 6/27/2013  1995
Long John Silver's / Taco Bell Ashtabula OH 
 440
 1,640
 
 2,080
 (539) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Swanton OH 
 430
 1,233
 
 1,663
 (405) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Sylvania OH 
 300
 799
 
 1,099
 (263) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Millington TN 
 380
 1,208
 
 1,588
 (397) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Bluefield VA 
 450
 1,927
 
 2,377
 (633) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Beaver WV 
 290
 1,156
 
 1,446
 (380) 6/27/2013  1995
Ale House Orlando FL 
 290
 3,647
 (1,300) 2,637
 (468) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Greenville SC 
 600
 2,166
 (1,528) 1,238
 (108) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Arvada CO 
 190
 1,465
 
 1,655
 (482) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Indianapolis IN 
 370
 1,130
 
 1,500
 (371) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Flint MI 
 110
 1,422
 
 1,532
 (467) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Saginaw MI 
 310
 1,110
 
 1,420
 (365) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's South Haven MI 
 260
 573
 
 833
 (188) 6/27/2013  1995
Boston Market Indianapolis IN 
 930
 
 (373) 557
 (4) 6/27/2013  1995
Boston Market Fayetteville NC 
 460
 1,520
 
 1,980
 (500) 6/27/2013  1995
Boston Market Raleigh NC 
 280
 1,015
 
 1,295
 (334) 6/27/2013  1995
Salty's Jasper AL 
 140
 219
 
 359
 (73) 6/27/2013  1995
Bruegger's Bagels Iowa City IA 
 40
 379
 (8) 411
 (124) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Atlanta GA 
 380
 499
 
 879
 (164) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Durham NC 
 170
 352
 
 522
 (116) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Edison NJ 
 480
 1,075
 
 1,555
 (353) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Albany NY 
 330
 850
 
 1,180
 (280) 6/27/2013  1995

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bonefish Grill Gainesville VA 
 751
 1,325
 
 2,076
 (465) 2/7/2014 2004
Boston Market Indianapolis IN 
 930
 
 350
 1,280
 (46) 6/27/2013 1995
Boston Market Indianapolis IN 
 410
 1,070
 
 1,480
 (264) 6/27/2013 1995
Boston Market Fayetteville NC 
 460
 1,520
 
 1,980
 (376) 6/27/2013 1995
Boston Market Raleigh NC 
 280
 1,015
 
 1,295
 (251) 6/27/2013 1995
Brick House Tavern & Tap W. Windsor NJ 1,043
 1,307
 1,498
 
 2,805
 (283) 2/7/2014 1998
Bridgestone Tire Kansas City MO 
 651
 1,954
 
 2,605
 (524) 5/31/2013 2008
Bruegger's Bagels Iowa City IA 
 40
 379
 (8) 411
 (94) 6/27/2013 1995
Bruegger's Bagels Durham NC 
 312
 728
 
 1,040
 (171) 7/31/2013 1926
Bruegger's Bagels Raleigh NC 
 230
 654
 
 884
 (162) 6/27/2013 1995
Buca di Beppo Italian Wheeling IL 
 450
 1,272
 
 1,722
 (325) 6/27/2013 1995
Buca di Beppo Italian Westlake OH 
 370
 887
 
 1,257
 (227) 6/27/2013 1995
Buffalo Wild Wings Langhorne PA 
 815
 815
 
 1,630
 (216) 7/31/2013 1999
Bunge North America Fort Worth TX 
 1,100
 8,433
 
 9,533
 (1,878) 11/5/2013 2005
Burger King Anchorage AK 
 427
 489
 
 916
 (123) 6/27/2013 1982 Central Square NY 
 500
 1,189
 
 1,689
 (391) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Andalusia AL 
 181
 1,025
 
 1,206
 (241) 7/31/2013 2000 Old Forge PA 
 390
 905
 126
 1,421
 (138) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Atmore AL 
 181
 723
 
 904
 (170) 7/31/2013 2000
Burger King Brewton AL 
 307
 920
 
 1,227
 (216) 7/31/2013 1993
Burger King Dothan AL 
 628
 1,167
 
 1,795
 (274) 7/31/2013 1983
Burger King Dothan AL 
 594
 1,104
 
 1,698
 (260) 7/31/2013 1999
Burger King Enterprise AL 
 437
 655
 
 1,092
 (154) 7/31/2013 1985
Burger King Evergreen AL 
 172
 689
 
 861
 (162) 7/31/2013 1997
Burger King Monroeville AL 
 325
 604
 
 929
 (142) 7/31/2013 1997
Burger King Opp AL 
 214
 857
 
 1,071
 (202) 7/31/2013 1994
Burger King Troy AL 
 461
 1,383
 
 1,844
 (325) 7/31/2013 1984
Burger King Sierra Vista AZ 
 260
 1,041
 
 1,301
 (245) 7/31/2013 1994
Burger King Tucson AZ 
 300
 1,307
 
 1,607
 (323) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Denver CO 
 872
 1,242
 
 2,114
 (313) 6/27/2013 1994
Burger King Clearwater FL 
 981
 591
 
 1,572
 (149) 6/27/2013 1980
Burger King Defuniak Springs FL 
 362
 1,087
 
 1,449
 (256) 7/31/2013 1989
Burger King Largo FL 
 683
 412
 
 1,095
 (104) 6/27/2013 1984
Burger King Niceville FL 
 598
 399
 
 997
 (94) 7/31/2013 1994
Captain D's Statesboro GA 
 350
 401
 
 751
 (132) 6/27/2013  1995
Checkers Huntsville AL 
 689
 
 
 689
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Checkers Fayetteville GA 
 681
 
 
 681
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Chipper's Grill Streator IL 
 190
 255
 
 445
 (85) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Merriam KS 
 390
 1,150
 
 1,540
 (382) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Branson MO 
 620
 2,209
 
 2,829
 (734) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's N. Kansas City MO 
 630
 937
 
 1,567
 (311) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Sedalia MO 
 500
 783
 
 1,283
 (260) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Black Mountain NC 
 210
 505
 
 715
 (168) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Fremont OH 
 320
 975
 
 1,295
 (324) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Ontario OR 
 240
 1,067
 
 1,307
 (355) 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Pasadena TX 
 500
 1,316
 
 1,816
 (438) 6/27/2013  1995
Einstein Bros. Bagels Dearborn MI 
 190
 724
 
 914
 (238) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Evansville IN 
 670
 2,707
 
 3,377
 (900) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Kokomo IN 
 780
 2,107
 
 2,887
 (700) 6/27/2013  1995
Hibachi Buffet Krab Hut Albany GA 
 460
 1,863
 
 2,323
 (619) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Brunswick GA 
 390
 2,093
 
 2,483
 (695) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Council Bluffs IA 
 1,140
 1,460
 
 2,600
 (485) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Aberdeen NC 
 690
 1,566
 
 2,256
 (520) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Lincoln NE 
 300
 2,930
 
 3,230
 (974) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Farmington NM 
 270
 3,174
 (2,023) 1,421
 (227) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Columbus OH 
 770
 2,476
 
 3,246
 (823) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Cookeville TN 
 800
 1,937
 
 2,737
 (644) 6/27/2013  1995
Golden Corral Bristol VA 
 750
 2,276
 
 3,026
 (757) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Hueytown AL 
 60
 639
 (311) 388
 (22) 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's Old Fort NC 
 300
 904
 
 1,204
 (297) 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's Chapin SC 
 380
 741
 
 1,121
 (244) 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's Bloomingdale TN 
 270
 844
 
 1,114
 (277) 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's Clinton TN 
 390
 893
 
 1,283
 (294) 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's Crossville TN 
 300
 689
 
 989
 (226) 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's / Red Burrito Attalla AL 
 220
 896
 
 1,116
 (295) 6/27/2013  1995


F-90


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
IHOP Natchitoches LA 
 750
 89
 
 839
 (30) 6/27/2013  1995
IHOP Fort Worth TX 
 560
 1,879
 1
 2,440
 (625) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Burley ID 
 240
 1,430
 
 1,670
 (470) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Arlington TX 
 420
 1,325
 
 1,745
 (436) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Arlington TX 
 420
 1,365
 
 1,785
 (449) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Farmers Branch TX 
 460
 1,640
 
 2,100
 (539) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Fort Worth TX 
 490
 1,702
 
 2,192
 (560) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Grand Prairie TX 
 600
 1,856
 
 2,456
 (610) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Grapevine TX 
 470
 1,344
 
 1,814
 (442) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 460
 1,437
 
 1,897
 (473) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 390
 1,172
 
 1,562
 (385) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 330
 1,845
 
 2,175
 (606) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 410
 1,621
 
 2,031
 (533) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 450
 1,396
 
 1,846
 (459) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Mesquite TX 
 560
 1,652
 
 2,212
 (543) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Port Arthur TX 
 460
 1,405
 
 1,865
 (462) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box San Antonio TX 
 350
 1,249
 
 1,599
 (410) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Spring TX 
 450
 1,487
 
 1,937
 (489) 6/27/2013  1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Deming NM 
 220
 691
 
 911
 (227) 6/27/2013  1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Las Cruces NM 
 270
 498
 
 768
 (164) 6/27/2013  1995
Leeann Chin Blaine MN 
 480
 528
 
 1,008
 (174) 6/27/2013  1995
Long John Silver's / A&W Clovis NM 
 210
 705
 (377) 538
 (86) 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bozeman MT 
 150
 343
 
 493
 (114) 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Glasgow MT 
 120
 217
 
 337
 (72) 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Livingston MT 
 130
 245
 
 375
 (81) 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Knoxville TN 
 300
 546
 
 846
 (181) 6/27/2013  1995
Popeyes Channelview TX 
 220
 401
 
 621
 (132) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Kennesaw GA 
 210
 46
 
 256
 (15) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Gadsden AL 
 220
 707
 
 927
 (235) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Grayson KY 
 420
 406
 
 826
 (135) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Hattiesburg MS 
 730
 618
 
 1,348
 (205) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Jackson MS 
 360
 572
 
 932
 (190) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Summerville SC 
 350
 800
 
 1,150
 (266) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Burger King Panama City FL 
 319
 956
 
 1,275
 (225) 7/31/2013 1998
Burger King Springfield FL 
 324
 971
 
 1,295
 (228) 7/31/2013 1995
Burger King Tallahassee FL 
 720
 720
 
 1,440
 (169) 7/31/2013 1998
Burger King Tallahassee FL 
 843
 454
 
 1,297
 (107) 7/31/2013 1980
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 635
 865
 
 1,500
 (218) 6/27/2013 1998
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 1,128
 977
 
 2,105
 (246) 6/27/2013 1993
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 795
 943
 
 1,738
 (237) 6/27/2013 1997
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 501
 1,219
 
 1,720
 (307) 6/27/2013 2001
Burger King��Atlanta GA 
 380
 499
 
 879
 (123) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Augusta GA 
 693
 2,080
 
 2,773
 (489) 7/31/2013 1986
Burger King Bainbridge GA 
 347
 1,042
 
 1,389
 (245) 7/31/2013 1998
Burger King Cairo GA 
 245
 981
 
 1,226
 (231) 7/31/2013 1997
Burger King Fort Oglethorpe GA 
 170
 2,175
 
 2,345
 (537) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Martinez GA 
 909
 1,350
 
 2,259
 (340) 6/27/2013 1998
Burger King Roswell GA 
 495
 1,156
 
 1,651
 (272) 7/31/2013 1998
Burger King Thomson GA 
 748
 876
 
 1,624
 (221) 6/27/2013 1988
Burger King Valdosta GA 
 564
 376
 
 940
 (88) 7/31/2013 1987
Burger King Des Moines IA 
 1,160
 949
 
 2,109
 (223) 7/31/2013 1987
Burger King Perry IA 
 557
 680
 
 1,237
 (160) 7/31/2013 1997
Burger King Red Oak IA 
 334
 1,002
 
 1,336
 (236) 7/31/2013 1988
Burger King Shenandoah IA 
 313
 582
 
 895
 (137) 7/31/2013 1988
Burger King Stuart IA 
 607
 911
 
 1,518
 (214) 7/31/2013 1997
Burger King Maywood IL 
 860
 1,051
 (357) 1,554
 (119) 7/31/2013 2003
Burger King Springfield IL 
 354
 677
 
 1,031
 (170) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Gary IN 
 544
 606
 
 1,150
 (152) 6/27/2013 1987
Burger King Cut Off LA 
 726
 1,088
 
 1,814
 (256) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Gonzales LA 
 380
 465
 
 845
 (109) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Lake Charles LA 
 456
 456
 
 912
 (107) 7/31/2013 1980
Burger King Lake Charles LA 
 610
 746
 
 1,356
 (175) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Metairie LA 
 728
 392
 
 1,120
 (92) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Opelousas LA 
 964
 964
 
 1,928
 (227) 7/31/2013 1978
Burger King Raceland LA 
 356
 533
 
 889
 (125) 7/31/2013 2000

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Shoney's Cookeville TN 
 510
 760
 
 1,270
 (252) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Lawrenceburg TN 
 330
 873
 
 1,203
 (290) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Charleston WV 
 190
 543
 
 733
 (181) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Lewisburg WV 
 110
 642
 
 752
 (213) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Princeton WV 
 90
 593
 
 683
 (197) 6/27/2013  1995
Shoney's Ripley WV 
 200
 599
 
 799
 (199) 6/27/2013  1995
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Conyers GA 
 450
 663
 
 1,113
 (220) 6/27/2013  1995
Sweet Tomato Coral Springs FL 
 790
 1,625
 
 2,415
 (540) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell Kingston TN 
 280
 714
 300
 1,294
 (281) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Bell / Pizza Hut Dallas TX 
 420
 1,582
 
 2,002
 (520) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana Austin TX 
 700
 2,105
 
 2,805
 (692) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana Pasadena TX 
 420
 1,420
 
 1,840
 (467) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 600
 1,955
 
 2,555
 (643) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana Schertz TX 
 520
 1,408
 
 1,928
 (463) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Cedar Rapids IA 
 430
 2,194
 
 2,624
 (729) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Salisbury MD 
 370
 1,299
 
 1,669
 (427) 6/27/2013  1995
Ale House St. Petersburg FL 
 930
 3,116
 
 4,046
 (1,036) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Clinton IA 
 490
 1,184
 
 1,674
 (393) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Fort Dodge IA 
 
 1,363
 
 1,363
 (656) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Marshalltown IA 
 660
 1,175
 
 1,835
 (390) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Mason City IA 
 340
 1,495
 
 1,835
 (497) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Muscatine IA 
 330
 1,266
 
 1,596
 (421) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's Sterling IL 
 390
 1,291
 
 1,681
 (429) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Kansas CIty KS 
 280
 364
 
 644
 (120) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Salina KS 
 540
 300
 64
 904
 (26) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Topeka KS 
 270
 433
 
 703
 (142) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Alma MI 
 380
 408
 
 788
 (134) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Chesterfield MI 
 210
 841
 
 1,051
 (276) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Davison MI 
 420
 631
 
 1,051
 (208) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Flint MI 
 230
 1,428
 
 1,658
 (470) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Midland MI 
 340
 753
 
 1,093
 (248) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Waterford MI 
 180
 962
 
 1,142
 (316) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Port Huron MI 
 210
 868
 
 1,078
 (285) 6/27/2013  1995

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Arby's Allentown PA 
 600
 1,652
 
 2,252
 (543) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Carlisle PA 
 200
 472
 
 672
 (155) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Hanover PA 
 400
 921
 
 1,321
 (303) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Amarillo TX 
 260
 627
 
 887
 (206) 6/27/2013  1995
Yemen Kitchen Raleigh NC 
 230
 654
 
 884
 (215) 6/27/2013  1995
Buca di Beppo Italian Wheeling IL 
 450
 1,272
 
 1,722
 (423) 6/27/2013  1995
Buca di Beppo Italian Westlake OH 
 370
 887
 
 1,257
 (295) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Amesbury MA 
 835
 1,217
 
 2,052
 (306) 6/27/2013 1977 Tucson AZ 
 300
 1,307
 250
 1,857
 (446) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Springfield MA 
 983
 516
 
 1,499
 (130) 6/27/2013 1974 Fort Oglethorpe GA 
 170
 2,175
 
 2,345
 (715) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Caribou ME 
 770
 440
 
 1,210
 (109) 6/27/2013 1995 Caribou ME 
 770
 440
 (853) 357
 (2) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Belding MI 
 221
 411
 
 632
 (97) 7/31/2013 1994 Cohoes NY 
 270
 563
 
 833
 (185) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Detroit MI 
 614
 331
 
 945
 (78) 7/31/2013 1988 Montgomery NY 
 480
 1,042
 
 1,522
 (343) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Grand Rapids MI 
 490
 545
 
 1,035
 (135) 6/27/2013 1995 Schenectady NY 
 380
 936
 
 1,316
 (308) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Grand Rapids MI 
 260
 780
 
 1,040
 (193) 6/27/2013 1995 Elko NV 
 260
 1,001
 
 1,261
 (329) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Grand Rapids MI 
 346
 807
 
 1,153
 (190) 7/31/2013 1985 Willoughby OH 
 410
 1,005
 
 1,415
 (330) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Ardmore OK 
 270
 1,023
 
 1,293
 (336) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Holland MI 
 420
 707
 
 1,127
 (175) 6/27/2013 1995 Roseburg OR 
 350
 886
 
 1,236
 (291) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Hudsonville MI 
 451
 676
 
 1,127
 (159) 7/31/2013 1988 Gaffney SC 
 370
 880
 
 1,250
 (289) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King L'Anse MI 
 32
 616
 
 648
 (145) 7/31/2013 1999 Greenville SC 
 420
 571
 
 991
 (188) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Sparta MI 
 640
 570
 
 1,210
 (141) 6/27/2013 1995 Bluefield WV 
 210
 1,163
 
 1,373
 (382) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Spring Lake MI 
 341
 512
 (222) 631
 (10) 7/31/2013 1994
Burger King Walker MI 
 305
 711
 
 1,016
 (167) 7/31/2013 1973
Burger King Warren MI 
 248
 745
 
 993
 (175) 7/31/2013 1987
Burger King Hastings MN 
 328
 608
 
 936
 (143) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Kansas City MO 
 444
 1,036
 
 1,480
 (244) 7/31/2013 1984
Burger King Brandon MS 
 649
 1,513
 
 2,162
 (381) 6/27/2013 1981
Burger King Clarksdale MS 
 865
 865
 
 1,730
 (204) 7/31/2013 1988
Burger King Cleveland MS 
 688
 1,606
 
 2,294
 (378) 7/31/2013 1985
Burger King Greenville MS 
 573
 1,337
 
 1,910
 (314) 7/31/2013 2004
Burger King Greenville MS 
 351
 820
 
 1,171
 (193) 7/31/2013 1993
Burger King Greenwood MS 
 692
 1,038
 
 1,730
 (244) 7/31/2013 1988
Burger King Grenada MS 
 536
 805
 
 1,341
 (189) 7/31/2013 1989
Burger King Philadelphia MS 
 402
 939
 
 1,341
 (221) 7/31/2013 1993
Burger King Yazoo City MS 
 489
 909
 
 1,398
 (214) 7/31/2013 1993
Burger King Asheville NC 
 728
 595
 
 1,323
 (140) 7/31/2013 1982
Burger King Chadbourn NC 
 353
 797
 
 1,150
 (201) 6/27/2013 1999
Burger King Claremont NC 
 646
 646
 
 1,292
 (162) 6/27/2013 2000
Burger King Clinton NC 
 494
 801
 
 1,295
 (202) 6/27/2013 1999
Burger King Durham NC 
 170
 352
 
 522
 (87) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Wilmington NC 
 573
 870
 
 1,443
 (219) 6/27/2013 1999
Charleston's Carmel IN 
 140
 3,016
 
 3,156
 (1,002) 6/27/2013  1995
Dairy Queen Mauldin SC 
 133
 
 
 133
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Dairy Queen Alto TX 
 50
 110
 
 160
 (36) 6/27/2013  1995
Dairy Queen Pineland TX 
 40
 120
 
 160
 (40) 6/27/2013  1995
Dairy Queen Silsbee TX 
 60
 100
 
 160
 (33) 6/27/2013  1995
Dukin Donuts/Baskin-Robbins Dearborn Heights MI 
 230
 846
 
 1,076
 (278) 6/27/2013  1995
Grandy's Ardmore OK 
 454
 
 
 454
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Grandy's Moore OK 
 320
 428
 
 748
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Grandy's Oklahoma City OK 
 260
 380
 
 640
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Grandy's Oklahoma City OK 
 320
 289
 
 609
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Hardee's Aiken SC 
 220
 450
 
 670
 (148) 6/27/2013  1995
Jack in the Box Belleville IL 
 200
 966
 
 1,166
 (318) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Houston TX 
 900
 1,749
 (699) 1,950
 (11) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Burger King Blair NE 
 272
 1,087
 
 1,359
 (256) 7/31/2013 1987
Burger King Wahoo NE 
 196
 1,109
 
 1,305
 (261) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Dover NH 
 1,159
 952
 
 2,111
 (240) 6/27/2013 1970
Burger King Nashua NH 
 655
 655
 
 1,310
 (154) 7/31/2013 2008
Burger King Edison NJ 
 480
 1,075
 
 1,555
 (266) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Elko NV 
 260
 1,001
 
 1,261
 (247) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Albany NY 
 330
 850
 
 1,180
 (210) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Central Square NY 
 500
 1,189
 
 1,689
 (294) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Cohoes NY 
 270
 563
 
 833
 (139) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Hamburg NY 
 403
 383
 
 786
 (96) 6/27/2013 1974
Burger King Irondequoit NY 
 988
 659
 
 1,647
 (155) 7/31/2013 1980
Burger King Montgomery NY 
 480
 1,042
 
 1,522
 (258) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Schenectady NY 
 380
 936
 
 1,316
 (231) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Syracuse NY 
 606
 606
 
 1,212
 (142) 7/31/2013 1986
Burger King Dayton OH 
 569
 466
 
 1,035
 (110) 7/31/2013 1990
Burger King Mansfield OH 
 191
 766
 
 957
 (180) 7/31/2013 1985
Burger King New Philadelphia OH 
 419
 779
 
 1,198
 (183) 7/31/2013 1986
Burger King Willoughby OH 
 410
 1,005
 
 1,415
 (248) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Ardmore OK 
 270
 1,023
 
 1,293
 (253) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
McAlisters Murfreesboro TN 
 310
 720
 
 1,030
 (239) 6/27/2013  1995
Lifetime Dentistry Chickasha Chickasha OK 
 100
 186
 
 286
 (64) 6/27/2013  1995
Popeyes Houston TX 
 190
 452
 
 642
 (149) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Memphis TN 
 100
 283
 167
 550
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Spaghetti Warehouse Arlington TX 
 630
 1,400
 
 2,030
 (465) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Dallas TX 
 810
 1,656
 
 2,466
 (550) 6/27/2013  1995
Spaghetti Warehouse San Antonio TX 
 1,140
 1,434
 (1,063) 1,511
 (126) 6/27/2013  1995
Subway Knoxville TN 
 160
 349
 
 509
 (115) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 500
 1,740
 
 2,240
 (572) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 280
 1,695
 
 1,975
 (557) 6/27/2013  1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 500
 1,766
 
 2,266
 (581) 6/27/2013  1995
Texas Roadhouse Grand Prairie TX 
 780
 1,867
 
 2,647
 (621) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Worcester MA 
 370
 1,288
 
 1,658
 (423) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's North Canton OH 
 152
 838
 
 990
 (281) 6/27/2013  1992
Arby's Guntersville AL 
 142
 503
 
 645
 (167) 6/27/2013  1986
Vacant Fountain Hills AZ 
 241
 597
 (227) 611
 (55) 6/27/2013  1994
Arby's Phoenix AZ 
 559
 618
 200
 1,377
 (219) 6/27/2013  1995
Accomplishments Through People Columbus GA 
 170
 
 
 170
 
 6/27/2013  1987
Burger King Anchorage AK 
 427
 489
 200
 1,116
 (162) 6/27/2013  1982
Burger King Largo FL 
 683
 412
 
 1,095
 (137) 6/27/2013  1984
Burger King Springfield MA 
 983
 516
 
 1,499
 (171) 6/27/2013  1974
Vacant East Greenbush NY 
 404
 269
 (548) 125
 
 6/27/2013  1980
Burger King Spanaway WA 
 509
 1,628
 
 2,137
 (540) 6/27/2013  1997
Captain D's Duncanville TX 
 295
 246
 
 541
 (82) 6/27/2013  1982
Checkers Tampa FL 
 736
 
 
 736
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Denny's Peoria AZ 
 310
 457
 
 767
 (153) 6/27/2013  1983
Denny's Tempe AZ 
 378
 245
 
 623
 (80) 6/27/2013  1980
Denny's Idaho Falls ID 
 196
 432
 
 628
 (138) 6/27/2013  1995
Vacant Albemarle NC 
 483
 457
 (590) 350
 (3) 6/27/2013  1995
FedEx Homewood AL 
 522
 779
 
 1,301
 (253) 6/27/2013  2000
Vacant Midwest City OK 
 1,175
 1,708
 (983) 1,900
 (263) 6/27/2013  1991
Golden Corral Norman OK 
 345
 2,107
 
 2,452
 (706) 6/27/2013  1994
Golden Corral College Station TX 
 1,265
 1,718
 
 2,983
 (575) 6/27/2013  1990

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Burger King Roseburg OR 
 350
 886
 
 1,236
 (219) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Harrisburg PA 
 619
 412
 
 1,031
 (97) 7/31/2013 1985
Burger King Old Forge PA 
 390
 905
 14
 1,309
 (12) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Gaffney SC 
 370
 880
 
 1,250
 (217) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Greenville SC 
 420
 571
 
 991
 (141) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King North Augusta SC 
 256
 1,451
 
 1,707
 (341) 7/31/2013 1985
Burger King North Augusta SC 
 450
 1,050
 
 1,500
 (247) 7/31/2013 1985
Burger King Chattanooga TN 
 740
 1,591
 
 2,331
 (393) 6/27/2013 1995
Burger King Gallatin TN 
 199
 463
 
 662
 (109) 7/31/2013 1984
Burger King Austin TX 
 666
 999
 (517) 1,148
 (102) 6/27/2013 1998
Burger King Laredo TX 
 684
 1,026
 
 1,710
 (241) 7/31/2013 2002
Burger King Texas City TX 
 421
 782
 300
 1,503
 (190) 7/31/2013 1984
Burger King Spanaway WA 
 509
 1,628
 
 2,137
 (410) 6/27/2013 1997
Burger King Germantown WI 
 644
 1,300
 
 1,944
 (327) 6/27/2013 1986
Burger King Marshfield WI 
 232
 885
 
 1,117
 (223) 6/27/2013 1986
Burger King Rhinelander WI 
 260
 606
 
 866
 (143) 7/31/2013 1986
Burger King Weston WI 
 329
 718
 
 1,047
 (181) 6/27/2013 1987
Burger King Bluefield WV 
 210
 1,163
 
 1,373
 (287) 6/27/2013 1995
Burlington West Valley City UT 
 2,331
 5,821
 
 8,152
 (29) 11/30/2017 2017
Cabela's Rogers AR 
 3,419
 17,605
 
 21,024
 (148) 9/25/2017 2012
Cabela's Thornton CO 
 3,677
 19,099
 
 22,776
 (149) 9/25/2017 2012
Cabela's Grandville MI 
 3,269
 20,328
 
 23,597
 (165) 9/25/2017 2013
Cabela's Oklahoma City OK 
 3,383
 11,590
 
 14,973
 (92) 9/25/2017 2015
Cabela's Lacey WA 
 3,393
 20,158
 
 23,551
 (146) 9/25/2017 2007
Cactus Wellhead Williston ND 
 72
 3,735
 
 3,807
 (553) 7/24/2014 2011
Cactus Wellhead Dubois PA 
 129
 2,542
 
 2,671
 (400) 6/12/2014 2012
Cactus Wellhead Center TX 
 115
 1,886
 
 2,001
 (296) 6/12/2014 2011
Cactus Wellhead Pleasanton TX 
 144
 2,908
 
 3,052
 (462) 6/12/2014 2011
Cadbury Holdings Whippany NJ 
 2,767
 38,018
 
 40,785
 (7,532) 11/5/2013 2004
California Pizza Kitchen Paradise Valley AZ 
 2,285
 1,480
 
 3,765
 (382) 2/7/2014 1994
California Pizza Kitchen Alpharetta GA 
 1,279
 3,249
 
 4,528
 (752) 2/7/2014 1994
California Pizza Kitchen Atlanta GA 
 2,307
 1,857
 
 4,164
 (467) 2/7/2014 1993

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Golden Corral Houston TX 
 1,147
 2,447
 (64) 3,530
 (820) 6/27/2013  1995
Grandy's Arlington TX 
 734
 
 
 734
 
 6/27/2013  1986
Grandy's Carrollton TX 
 847
 
 
 847
 
 6/27/2013  1986
Grandy's Fort Worth TX 
 777
 
 
 777
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Grandy's Fort Worth TX 
 811
 
 
 811
 
 6/27/2013  1985
Grandy's Garland TX 
 623
 
 
 623
 
 6/27/2013  1980
Grandy's Garland TX 
 859
 
 
 859
 
 6/27/2013  1985
Grandy's Irving TX 
 871
 
 
 871
 
 6/27/2013  1983
Grandy's Lancaster TX 
 780
 
 
 780
 
 6/27/2013  1984
Grandy's Mesquite TX 
 871
 
 
 871
 
 6/27/2013  1983
Grandy's Plano TX 
 871
 
 
 871
 
 6/27/2013  1980
Hardee's Canton GA 
 488
 539
 
 1,027
 (179) 6/27/2013  1983
Hardee's Mount Vernon IA 
 320
 480
 (6) 794
 (159) 6/27/2013  1987
Jack in the Box Texas City TX 
 454
 844
 
 1,298
 (280) 6/27/2013  1991
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken Florissant MO 
 306
 560
 
 866
 (186) 6/27/2013  1984
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken St. Ann MO 
 187
 571
 
 758
 (189) 6/27/2013  1984
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken St. Louis MO 
 107
 874
 
 981
 (290) 6/27/2013  1984
Vacant Mobile AL 
 127
 276
 (388) 15
 
 6/27/2013  1974
Pizza Hut/WingStreet East Syracuse NY 
 137
 185
 
 322
 (61) 6/27/2013  1978
Vacant Nedrow NY 
 55
 80
 (105) 30
 
 6/27/2013  1979
Penske Bedford OH 
 183
 
 
 183
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Defiance OH 
 114
 197
 
 311
 (65) 6/27/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet North Olmsted OH 
 122
 153
 
 275
 (51) 6/27/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Strongsville OH 
 74
 108
 
 182
 (36) 6/27/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Toledo OH 
 58
 173
 
 231
 (57) 6/27/2013  1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cedar City UT 
 52
 361
 
 413
 (120) 6/27/2013  1978
Popeyes Austin TX 
 1,216
 533
 
 1,749
 (177) 6/27/2013  1996
TGI Fridays Warwick RI 
 1,228
 2,775
 (1,253) 2,750
 (452) 6/27/2013  1983
Verizon Wireless Statesville NC 
 207
 459
 27
 693
 (151) 6/27/2013  1993
Wendy's Homewood AL 
 995
 
 
 995
 
 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Benton AR 
 478
 1,018
 
 1,496
 (338) 6/27/2013  1993
Wendy's Bentonville AR 
 648
 708
 
 1,356
 (235) 6/27/2013  1993
Wendy's Bryant AR 
 529
 575
 
 1,104
 (191) 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
California Pizza Kitchen Schaumburg IL 
 1,180
 3,179
 
 4,359
 (738) 2/7/2014 1995
California Pizza Kitchen Grapevine TX 
 1,544
 2,250
 
 3,794
 (533) 2/7/2014 1994
Captain D's Statesboro GA 
 350
 401
 
 751
 (99) 6/27/2013 1995
Captain D's Florence KY 
 248
 325
 
 573
 (82) 6/27/2013 1981
Captain D's Southaven MS 
 270
 564
 
 834
 (139) 6/27/2013 1995
Captain D's Memphis TN 
 230
 338
 
 568
 (84) 6/27/2013 1995
Captain D's Duncanville TX 
 295
 246
 
 541
 (62) 6/27/2013 1982
Cargill Blair NE 2,437
 627
 4,989
 
 5,616
 (859) 2/7/2014 2009
Carl's Jr. Purcell OK 
 77
 513
 
 590
 (129) 6/27/2013 1980
CarMax Henderson NV 
 8,542
 10,396
 
 18,938
 (2,255) 2/7/2014 2002
CarMax Austin TX 9,900
 5,461
 16,940
 
 22,401
 (3,305) 2/7/2014 2004
Carrabba's Scottsdale AZ 
 1,350
 1,847
 
 3,197
 (317) 2/7/2014 2000
Carrabba's Louisville CO 
 1,083
 1,400
 
 2,483
 (324) 2/7/2014 2000
Carrabba's Tampa FL 
 1,650
 2,085
 
 3,735
 (502) 2/7/2014 1994
Carrabba's Duluth GA 
 836
 2,881
 
 3,717
 (675) 2/7/2014 2004
Carrabba's Bowie MD 
 1,429
 1,036
 
 2,465
 (448) 2/7/2014 2003
Carrabba's Brooklyn OH 
 1,187
 2,212
 
 3,399
 (492) 2/7/2014 2002
Carrabba's Washington Township OH 
 906
 1,859
 
 2,765
 (452) 2/7/2014 2001
Carrabba's Columbia SC 
 1,159
 2,164
 
 3,323
 (497) 2/7/2014 2000
Carrabba's Johnson City TN 
 771
 2,536
 
 3,307
 (632) 2/7/2014 2003
Cashland Celina OH 
 108
 132
 
 240
 (35) 7/31/2013 1995
Castle Dental Murfreesboro TN 
 256
 256
 
 512
 (68) 7/31/2013 1996
Cequent Trailer Products Mosinee WI 
 1,416
 3,259
 
 4,675
 (318) 2/21/2014 1992
Charleston's Carmel IN 
 140
 3,016
 
 3,156
 (771) 6/27/2013 1995
Checkers Huntsville AL 
 689
 
 
 689
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Checkers Hollywood FL 
 160
 2,220
 
 2,380
 (567) 6/27/2013 1995
Checkers Jacksonville FL 
 731
 1,096
 
 1,827
 (258) 7/31/2013 1993
Checkers Lauderhill FL 
 280
 1,951
 
 2,231
 (499) 6/27/2013 1995
Checkers Miami FL 
 621
 
 
 621
 
 7/31/2013 1993
Checkers Orlando FL 
 1,033
 
 
 1,033
 
 7/31/2013 1995
Checkers Plantation FL 
 220
 1,461
 
 1,681
 (373) 6/27/2013 1995
Checkers Tampa FL 
 736
 
 
 736
 
 6/27/2013 1995
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Cabot AR 
 524
 707
 
 1,231
 (234) 6/27/2013  1991
Wendy's Conway AR 
 478
 594
 
 1,072
 (197) 6/27/2013  1985
Wendy's Conway AR 
 482
 833
 
 1,315
 (276) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Fayetteville AR 
 408
 830
 
 1,238
 (275) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Fort Smith AR 
 195
 1,186
 (11) 1,370
 (394) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Fort Smith AR 
 63
 1,016
 
 1,079
 (337) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 278
 878
 
 1,156
 (291) 6/27/2013  1976
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 990
 623
 
 1,613
 (514) 6/27/2013  1982
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 605
 463
 
 1,068
 (154) 6/27/2013  1987
Wendy's Rogers AR 
 579
 912
 
 1,491
 (303) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Russellville AR 
 356
 638
 
 994
 (211) 6/27/2013  1985
Wendy's Springdale AR 
 323
 896
 
 1,219
 (297) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Springdale AR 
 410
 821
 
 1,231
 (272) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Van Buren AR 
 197
 748
 
 945
 (248) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Norwich CT 
 703
 937
 
 1,640
 (311) 6/27/2013  1980
Wendy's Douglasville GA 
 605
 776
 (12) 1,369
 (257) 6/27/2013  1993
Wendy's Millville NJ 
 373
 1,169
 
 1,542
 (388) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Columbia SC 
 1,368
 
 
 1,368
 (76) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 268
 630
 
 898
 (209) 6/27/2013  1985
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 410
 451
 
 861
 (150) 6/27/2013  1987
Wendy's Burlington WA 
 425
 806
 
 1,231
 (267) 6/27/2013  1994
Vacant Youngstown OH 
 139
 232
 (196) 175
 
 6/27/2013  1976
Whataburger El Campo TX 
 693
 1,013
 
 1,706
 (336) 6/27/2013  1986
Abuelo's Rogers AR 
 825
 2,296
 
 3,121
 (769) 6/27/2013  2003
Aliberto's Mexican Food Holbrook AZ 
 32
 96
 
 128
 (32) 6/27/2013  1981
Applebee's Brandon FL 
 2,453
 3,647
 
 6,100
 (1,222) 6/27/2013  1997
Applebee's Plant City FL 
 2,079
 2,869
 
 4,948
 (961) 6/27/2013  2001
Applebee's Valrico FL 
 1,202
 3,274
 
 4,476
 (1,097) 6/27/2013  1998
Applebee's Newton KS 
 504
 1,569
 
 2,073
 (525) 6/27/2013  1998
Applebee's Ocean Springs MS 
 673
 1,708
 (1,359) 1,022
 (42) 6/27/2013  2000
Applebee's Corpus Christi TX 
 563
 2,926
 
 3,489
 (980) 6/27/2013  2000


F-96


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Applebee's Edinburg TX 
 898
 2,058
 
 2,956
 (689) 6/27/2013  2006
Applebee's McAllen TX 
 1,114
 1,988
 
 3,102
 (666) 6/27/2013  1993
Applebee's New Braunfels TX 
 566
 1,486
 
 2,052
 (498) 6/27/2013  1995
Applebee's San Antonio TX 
 732
 1,796
 
 2,528
 (601) 6/27/2013  2003
Arby's Alexander City AL 
 527
 401
 
 928
 (133) 6/27/2013  1999
Arby's Kennesaw GA 
 583
 840
 
 1,423
 (279) 6/27/2013  1984
Arby's Richmond Hill GA 
 430
 755
 
 1,185
 (250) 6/27/2013  1984
Arby's Mount Vernon IL 
 911
 764
 
 1,675
 (254) 6/27/2013  1999
Arby's New Albany IN 
 456
 470
 
 926
 (156) 6/27/2013  2005
Arby's New Albany IN 
 325
 465
 
 790
 (154) 6/27/2013  1995
Arby's Scottsburg IN 
 526
 445
 
 971
 (148) 6/27/2013  1989
Arby's Corinth MS 
 753
 429
 
 1,182
 (142) 6/27/2013  1984
Black Meg 43 Copperas Cove TX 
 151
 151
 (105) 197
 (6) 6/27/2013  1979
Bojangles Hickory NC 
 749
 1,789
 
 2,538
 (593) 6/27/2013  1973
Bojangles Taylorsville NC 
 436
 1,108
 
 1,544
 (367) 6/27/2013  1987
Burger King Denver CO 
 872
 1,242
 
 2,114
 (412) 6/27/2013  1994
Burger King Clearwater FL 
 981
 591
 
 1,572
 (196) 6/27/2013  1980
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 635
 865
 
 1,500
 (287) 6/27/2013  1998
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 1,128
 977
 
 2,105
 (324) 6/27/2013  1993
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 795
 943
 
 1,738
 (313) 6/27/2013  1997
Burger King Alpharetta GA 
 501
 1,219
 
 1,720
 (404) 6/27/2013  2001
Burger King Martinez GA 
 909
 1,350
 
 2,259
 (448) 6/27/2013  1998
Burger King Thomson GA 
 748
 876
 
 1,624
 (291) 6/27/2013  1988
Burger King Springfield IL 
 354
 677
 (562) 469
 (19) 6/27/2013  1995
Burger King Gary IN 
 544
 606
 
 1,150
 (201) 6/27/2013  1987
Burger King Amesbury MA 
 835
 1,217
 
 2,052
 (404) 6/27/2013  1977
Burger King Brandon MS 
 649
 1,513
 
 2,162
 (502) 6/27/2013  1981
Burger King Chadbourn NC 
 353
 797
 
 1,150
 (264) 6/27/2013  1999
Burger King Claremont NC 
 646
 646
 
 1,292
 (214) 6/27/2013  2000
Burger King Clinton NC 
 494
 801
 
 1,295
 (266) 6/27/2013  1999
Burger King Wilmington NC 
 573
 870
 
 1,443
 (289) 6/27/2013  1999
Burger King Dover NH 
 1,159
 952
 
 2,111
 (316) 6/27/2013  1970
Burger King Hamburg NY 
 403
 383
 
 786
 (127) 6/27/2013  1974

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Checkers Fayetteville GA 
 681
 
 
 681
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Chedder's Casual Cafe Brandon FL 
 860
 3,071
 (2,203) 1,728
 (108) 6/27/2013 2003
Chedder's Casual Cafe Bolingbrook IL 
 1,344
 1,760
 
 3,104
 (458) 6/27/2013 1997
Chedder's Casual Cafe Lubbock TX 
 1,053
 2,345
 
 3,398
 (610) 6/27/2013 1997
Chevy's Miami FL 
 1,455
 783
 
 2,238
 (208) 7/31/2013 1995
Chevy's Greenbelt MD 
 530
 2,399
 
 2,929
 (613) 6/27/2013 1995
Chevy's Lake Oswego OR 
 590
 1,693
 
 2,283
 (433) 6/27/2013 1995
Chicago Bridge & Iron Baton Rouge LA 
 1,695
 12,360
 (1,567) 12,488
 (955) 3/28/2014 2006
Children's Courtyard Grand Prairie TX 
 367
 1,055
 
 1,422
 (220) 2/7/2014 1999
Childtime Childcare Modesto CA 
 280
 1,524
 
 1,804
 (308) 2/7/2014 1988
Childtime Childcare Bedford OH 
 111
 852
 
 963
 (191) 2/7/2014 1979
Childtime Childcare Oklahoma City OK 
 124
 796
 
 920
 (177) 2/7/2014 1985
Childtime Childcare Oklahoma City OK 
 108
 793
 
 901
 (170) 2/7/2014 1986
Chilis Fayetteville AR 
 1,370
 1,714
 
 3,084
 (438) 6/27/2013 1995
Chilis East Peoria IL 
 1,023
 2,347
 
 3,370
 (611) 6/27/2013 2003
Chilis Flanders NJ 1,508
 1,402
 842
 
 2,244
 (316) 2/7/2014 2003
Chilis Amarillo TX 
 811
 1,893
 
 2,704
 (502) 7/31/2013 1984
Chilis Riverdale UT 
 800
 899
 
 1,699
 (230) 6/27/2013 1995
China Buffet Alvin TX 
 110
 299
 
 409
 (78) 6/27/2013 1982
China Buffet Angleton TX 
 127
 272
 
 399
 (71) 6/27/2013 1982
China Town Buffet Bismarck ND 
 1,038
 1,928
 
 2,966
 (511) 7/31/2013 2000
Chipper's Grill Streator IL 
 190
 255
 
 445
 (65) 6/27/2013 1995
Church's Chicken Atmore AL 
 144
 574
 
 718
 (135) 7/31/2013 1976
Church's Chicken Bay Minette AL 
 134
 757
 
 891
 (178) 7/31/2013 2003
Church's Chicken Flomaton AL 
 173
 518
 
 691
 (122) 7/31/2013 1981
Church's Chicken Jackson AL 
 127
 719
 
 846
 (169) 7/31/2013 1982
Church's Chicken Orlando FL 
 254
 380
 
 634
 (89) 7/31/2013 1984
Church's Chicken Augusta GA 
 178
 533
 (591) 120
 
 7/31/2013 1981
Church's Chicken Augusta GA 
 256
 597
 
 853
 (140) 7/31/2013 1976
Church's Chicken Augusta GA 
 178
 414
 (525) 67
 
 7/31/2013 1978
Church's Chicken Augusta GA 
 196
 458
 
 654
 (108) 7/31/2013 1984
Church's Chicken Anderson SC 
 647
 277
 (648) 276
 (1) 7/31/2013 1981

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Burger King Austin TX 
 666
 999
 (516) 1,149
 (161) 6/27/2013  1998
Burger King Germantown WI 
 644
 1,300
 200
 2,144
 (431) 6/27/2013  1986
Burger King Marshfield WI 
 232
 885
 
 1,117
 (294) 6/27/2013  1986
Burger King Weston WI 
 329
 718
 
 1,047
 (238) 6/27/2013  1987
Captain D's Florence KY 
 248
 325
 
 573
 (108) 6/27/2013  1981
Carl's Jr. Purcell OK 
 77
 513
 
 590
 (170) 6/27/2013  1980
Vacant Brandon FL 
 860
 3,071
 (2,202) 1,729
 (229) 6/27/2013  2003
Chedder's Casual Cafe Bolingbrook IL 
 1,344
 1,760
 
 3,104
 (590) 6/27/2013  1997
Chedder's Casual Cafe Lubbock TX 
 1,053
 2,345
 
 3,398
 (785) 6/27/2013  1997
Chilis East Peoria IL 
 1,023
 2,347
 
 3,370
 (786) 6/27/2013  2003
China Buffet Alvin TX 
 110
 299
 
 409
 (100) 6/27/2013  1982
China Buffet Angleton TX 
 127
 272
 
 399
 (91) 6/27/2013  1982
Denny's Marion OH 
 115
 390
 
 505
 (131) 6/27/2013  1989
Furr's Garland TX 
 1,529
 3,715
 
 5,244
 (1,244) 6/27/2013  2008
Golden Corral Gilbert AZ 
 871
 2,910
 
 3,781
 (975) 6/27/2013  2006
Golden Corral Goodyear AZ 
 686
 1,939
 
 2,625
 (649) 6/27/2013  2006
Golden Corral Surprise AZ 
 1,258
 4,068
 
 5,326
 (1,363) 6/27/2013  2007
Golden Corral Palatka FL 
 853
 1,048
 (471) 1,430
 (183) 6/27/2013  1997
Golden Corral Zanesville OH 
 487
 2,030
 
 2,517
 (680) 6/27/2013  2002
Hardee's Pace FL 
 419
 435
 
 854
 (144) 6/27/2013  1991
Hardee's Williston FL 
 395
 553
 
 948
 (184) 6/27/2013  1992
Hardee's Sparta NC 
 372
 346
 
 718
 (115) 6/27/2013  1983
Hardee's Erwin TN 
 346
 406
 
 752
 (135) 6/27/2013  1982
Vacant Auburn AL 
 1,111
 933
 
 2,044
 (313) 6/27/2013  1998
Vacant Montgomery AL 
 941
 
 (591) 350
 
 6/27/2013  1998
IHOP Bossier City LA 
 541
 1,342
 
 1,883
 (449) 6/27/2013  1998
Johnny Carinos Rogers AR 
 997
 2,540
 
 3,537
 (851) 6/27/2013  2001
Johnny Carinos Houston TX 
 1,328
 2,656
 
 3,984
 (890) 6/27/2013  2002
Kentucky Fried Chicken Bloomington IL 
 576
 1,466
 
 2,042
 (486) 6/27/2013  2004
Kentucky Fried Chicken Decatur IL 
 276
 1,619
 
 1,895
 (537) 6/27/2013  2001
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Granite City IL 
 102
 1,083
 
 1,185
 (359) 6/27/2013  1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken Crawfordsville IN 
 159
 1,068
 
 1,227
 (354) 6/27/2013  1979
Kentucky Fried Chicken Franklin IN 
 205
 1,375
 
 1,580
 (456) 6/27/2013  1976

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Church's Chicken Charleston SC 
 421
 344
 
 765
 (81) 7/31/2013 1973
Church's Chicken Charleston SC 
 500
 167
 
 667
 (39) 7/31/2013 1979
Church's Chicken Columbia SC 
 437
 437
 (486) 388
 
 7/31/2013 1978
Church's Chicken Columbia SC 
 231
 428
 (393) 266
 
 7/31/2013 1977
Church's Chicken Greenville SC 
 280
 342
 (482) 140
 
 7/31/2013 1970
Church's Chicken Greenville SC 
 254
 472
 
 726
 (111) 7/31/2013 2009
Church's Chicken Greenville SC 
 325
 487
 (458) 354
 
 7/31/2013 1984
Church's Chicken Greenwood SC 
 188
 349
 (390) 147
 (1) 7/31/2013 2002
Church's Chicken North Charleston SC 
 302
 302
 
 604
 (71) 7/31/2013 1976
Church's Chicken North Charleston SC 
 407
 407
 
 814
 (96) 7/31/2013 1977
Church's Chicken Orangeburg SC 
 407
 271
 (322) 356
 
 7/31/2013 1985
Church's Chicken Spartanburg SC 
 411
 274
 (528) 157
 
 7/31/2013 1972
Church's Chicken Spartanburg SC 
 350
 525
 (431) 444
 
 7/31/2013 1978
Cigna Phoenix AZ 
 6,194
 16,215
 
 22,409
 (3,018) 2/7/2014 2012
Cigna Plano TX 
 10,036
 42,676
 
 52,712
 (8,036) 2/7/2014 2009
Circle K Phoenix AZ 
 344
 1,377
 
 1,721
 (411) 5/4/2012 1986
Circle K Martinez GA 
 348
 813
 
 1,161
 (237) 8/28/2012 2003
Circle K Martinez GA 
 293
 329
 
 622
 (62) 9/26/2014 1993
Circle K Thomson GA 
 637
 340
 
 977
 (66) 9/26/2014 1990
Circle K Akron OH 
 675
 1,254
 
 1,929
 (362) 9/27/2012 1996
Citizens Bank Colchester CT 
 185
 1,049
 
 1,234
 (290) 9/28/2012 2012
Citizens Bank Deep River CT 
 453
 1,812
 
 2,265
 (500) 9/28/2012 1851
Citizens Bank East Hampton CT 
 312
 935
 
 1,247
 (269) 4/26/2012 1984
Citizens Bank East Lyme CT 
 258
 1,032
 
 1,290
 (285) 9/28/2012 1972
Citizens Bank Hamden CT 
 581
 475
 
 1,056
 (131) 9/28/2012 1995
Citizens Bank Higganum CT 
 171
 971
 
 1,142
 (338) 8/1/2010 1995
Citizens Bank Montville CT 
 413
 2,342
 
 2,755
 (646) 9/28/2012 1984
Citizens Bank Stonington CT 
 190
 1,079
 
 1,269
 (298) 9/28/2012 1984
Citizens Bank Stonington CT 
 104
 937
 (405) 636
 
 12/14/2012 1982
Citizens Bank Lewes DE 
 102
 916
 
 1,018
 (239) 2/22/2013 1968
Citizens Bank Wilmington DE 
 299
 299
 
 598
 (86) 4/26/2012 1967
Citizens Bank Dorchester MA 
 386
 386
 
 772
 (111) 4/26/2012 1960

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Kentucky Fried Chicken Greenwood IN 
 339
 1,405
 
 1,744
 (466) 6/27/2013  1976
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Allison Park PA 
 246
 683
 
 929
 (227) 6/27/2013  1978
Kentucky Fried Chicken Germantown WI 
 368
 913
 
 1,281
 (303) 6/27/2013  1989
Kentucky Fried Chicken Green Bay WI 
 208
 1,022
 
 1,230
 (339) 6/27/2013  1986
Kentucky Fried Chicken Milwaukee WI 
 396
 773
 
 1,169
 (256) 6/27/2013  1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken Milwaukee WI 
 281
 795
 
 1,076
 (264) 6/27/2013  1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken Milwaukee WI 
 89
 750
 
 839
 (249) 6/27/2013  1989
Kentucky Fried Chicken Milwaukee WI 
 197
 975
 
 1,172
 (323) 6/27/2013  1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken Milwaukee WI 
 138
 924
 
 1,062
 (306) 6/27/2013  1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken South Milwaukee WI 
 197
 695
 
 892
 (231) 6/27/2013  1993
Kentucky Fried Chicken Wauwatosa WI 
 135
 615
 
 750
 (204) 6/27/2013  1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken West Bend WI 
 185
 705
 
 890
 (234) 6/27/2013  1972
Kentucky Fried Chicken Charleston IL 
 282
 1,514
 
 1,796
 (502) 6/27/2013  2003
Long John Silver's / A&W Collinsville IL 
 220
 940
 
 1,160
 (312) 6/27/2013  2006
Long John Silver's / A&W Fairview Heights IL 
 258
 525
 
 783
 (174) 6/27/2013  1976
Long John Silver's / A&W Jacksonville IL 
 171
 431
 
 602
 (143) 6/27/2013  1978
Long John Silver's / A&W Litchfield IL 
 194
 996
 
 1,190
 (330) 6/27/2013  1986
Long John Silver's / A&W Marion IL 
 305
 1,059
 (924) 440
 (15) 6/27/2013  1983
Long John Silver's / A&W Mount Carmel IL 
 105
 484
 
 589
 (161) 6/27/2013  1977
Long John Silver's / A&W Vandalia IL 
 101
 484
 (376) 209
 (8) 6/27/2013  1976
Long John Silver's / A&W West Frankfort IL 
 244
 996
 (836) 404
 (14) 6/27/2013  1977
Long John Silver's / A&W Wood River IL 
 251
 314
 
 565
 (104) 6/27/2013  1975
Long John Silver's / A&W Garden City KS 
 120
 530
 
 650
 (176) 6/27/2013  1978
Long John Silver's / A&W Hays KS 
 160
 624
 
 784
 (207) 6/27/2013  1994
Vacant Englewood OH 
 547
 
 (451) 96
 
 6/27/2013  1974
Long John Silver's / A&W Fairborn OH 
 103
 300
 
 403
 (99) 6/27/2013  1976
Long John Silver's / A&W Austin TX 
 459
 477
 
 936
 (158) 6/27/2013  1993
Long John Silver's / KFC Green Bay WI 
 748
 563
 
 1,311
 (187) 6/27/2013  1978
Los Tios Mexican Restaurant Dalton OH 
 18
 30
 
 48
 (10) 6/27/2013  1990
McDonald's Scotland Neck NC 
 320
 
 
 320
 
 6/27/2013  2005
O'Charley's Dalton GA 
 406
 1,817
 
 2,223
 (609) 6/27/2013  1993
O'Charley's Tucker GA 
 1,037
 866
 
 1,903
 (290) 6/27/2013  1993
PDM Realty Kingston PA 
 29
 
 
 29
 
 6/27/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Ludlow MA 
 810
 540
 
 1,350
 (149) 9/28/2012 1995
Citizens Bank Malden MA 
 488
 596
 
 1,084
 (165) 9/28/2012 1920
Citizens Bank Malden MA 1,697
 484
 1,935
 
 2,419
 (534) 9/28/2012 1988
Citizens Bank Medford MA 1,194
 589
 1,094
 
 1,683
 (302) 9/28/2012 1938
Citizens Bank Milton MA 2,244
 619
 2,476
 
 3,095
 (666) 12/14/2012 1968
Citizens Bank New Bedford MA 
 297
 694
 
 991
 (191) 9/28/2012 1983
Citizens Bank Randolph MA 1,383
 480
 1,439
 
 1,919
 (397) 9/28/2012 1979
Citizens Bank Somerville MA 
 561
 561
 
 1,122
 (155) 9/28/2012 1940
Citizens Bank South Dennis MA 
 
 1,294
 
 1,294
 (348) 12/14/2012 1986
Citizens Bank Springfield MA 
 187
 747
 
 934
 (185) 5/10/2013 1975
Citizens Bank Winthrop MA 
 390
 724
 
 1,114
 (200) 9/28/2012 1974
Citizens Bank Woburn MA 
 350
 816
 
 1,166
 (220) 12/14/2012 1991
Citizens Bank Clinton Township MI 
 574
 3,250
 
 3,824
 (1,137) 8/1/2010 1970
Citizens Bank Dearborn MI 
 434
 2,461
 
 2,895
 (809) 8/1/2010 1977
Citizens Bank Dearborn MI 
 385
 2,184
 
 2,569
 (718) 8/1/2010 1974
Citizens Bank Detroit MI 
 112
 636
 (559) 189
 (2) 8/1/2010 1958
Citizens Bank Farmington MI 
 303
 707
 
 1,010
 (190) 12/14/2012 1962
Citizens Bank Grosse Pointe MI 
 410
 2,322
 
 2,732
 (800) 8/1/2010 1975
Citizens Bank Lathrup Village MI 
 283
 1,602
 
 1,885
 (558) 8/1/2010 1980
Citizens Bank Livonia MI 
 261
 1,476
 
 1,737
 (519) 8/1/2010 1959
Citizens Bank Richmond MI 
 168
 951
 
 1,119
 (334) 8/1/2010 1980
Citizens Bank Southfield MI 
 283
 1,605
 (1,206) 682
 (4) 8/1/2010 1975
Citizens Bank St. Clair Shores MI 
 309
 1,748
 
 2,057
 (614) 8/1/2010 1960
Citizens Bank Troy MI 
 312
 935
 
 1,247
 (252) 12/14/2012 1980
Citizens Bank Utica MI 
 376
 2,133
 
 2,509
 (735) 8/1/2010 1982
Citizens Bank Warren MI 
 178
 1,009
 
 1,187
 (351) 8/1/2010 1963

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Jackson GA 
 673
 735
 
 1,408
 (244) 6/27/2013  1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Louisville KY 
 539
 499
 
 1,038
 (166) 6/27/2013  1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Delaware OH 
 270
 721
 
 991
 (239) 6/27/2013  1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Box Elder SD 
 68
 217
 (152) 133
 (1) 6/27/2013  1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Crystal City TX 
 148
 453
 
 601
 (150) 6/27/2013  1981
Ponderosa Scottsburg IN 
 430
 141
 
 571
 (47) 6/27/2013  1985
Popeyes Brandon FL 
 776
 961
 
 1,737
 (319) 6/27/2013  1978
Popeyes Tampa FL 
 673
 1,065
 
 1,738
 (353) 6/27/2013  1976
Popeyes Winter Haven FL 
 484
 1,001
 
 1,485
 (332) 6/27/2013  1976
Popeyes Bayou Vista LA 
 375
 709
 
 1,084
 (235) 6/27/2013  1985
Popeyes Franklin LA 
 283
 538
 
 821
 (178) 6/27/2013  1985
Popeyes Lafayette LA 
 434
 899
 
 1,333
 (298) 6/27/2013  1993
Popeyes Lafayette LA 
 473
 901
 
 1,374
 (299) 6/27/2013  1996
Popeyes Marksville LA 
 487
 1,129
 
 1,616
 (374) 6/27/2013  1987
Popeyes Greenville MS 
 513
 977
 
 1,490
 (324) 6/27/2013  1984
Popeyes Port Arthur TX 
 408
 589
 
 997
 (195) 6/27/2013  1984
Popeyes Newport News VA 
 381
 217
 
 598
 (72) 6/27/2013  2002
Popeyes Portsmouth VA 
 369
 230
 
 599
 (76) 6/27/2013  2002
Blue Goose Cantina Mexican Grapevine TX 
 572
 868
 
 1,440
 (291) 6/27/2013  1999
Schlotzsky's Colorado Springs CO 
 530
 530
 
 1,060
 (176) 6/27/2013  1997
Sonic Drive-In Wadesboro NC 
 137
 266
 
 403
 (88) 6/27/2013  2007
TGI Fridays Blasdell NY 
 1,215
 1,913
 
 3,128
 (641) 6/27/2013  2000
Taco Bell Cullman AL 
 375
 1,053
 (940) 488
 
 6/27/2013  1988
Taco Bell Hartselle AL 
 378
 781
 
 1,159
 (259) 6/27/2013  1996
Taco Bell Jasper AL 
 445
 814
 
 1,259
 (270) 6/27/2013  1987
Taco Bell Corona CA 
 306
 1,138
 
 1,444
 (377) 6/27/2013  1990
Taco Bell Fairfield CA 
 500
 1,327
 
 1,827
 (440) 6/27/2013  1985
Taco Bell Fontana CA 
 524
 1,016
 
 1,540
 (337) 6/27/2013  1992
Taco Bell Moreno Valley CA 
 367
 998
 
 1,365
 (331) 6/27/2013  1992
Taco Bell Rancho Cucamonga CA 
 415
 1,210
 
 1,625
 (401) 6/27/2013  1992
Taco Bell Vacaville CA 
 522
 1,513
 
 2,035
 (502) 6/27/2013  1985
Taco Bell Vacaville CA 
 1,184
 1,375
 
 2,559
 (456) 6/27/2013  1994
Taco Bell Kennesaw GA 
 162
 601
 
 763
 (199) 6/27/2013  1984

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Keene NH 1,885
 132
 2,511
 
 2,643
 (676) 12/14/2012 1900
Citizens Bank Manchester NH 
 640
 782
 
 1,422
 (216) 9/28/2012 1941
Citizens Bank Manchester NH 
 
 1,568
 
 1,568
 (422) 12/14/2012 1995
Citizens Bank Pelham NH 
 113
 340
 
 453
 (98) 4/26/2012 1983
Citizens Bank Pittsfield NH 
 160
 908
 
 1,068
 (316) 8/1/2010 1976
Citizens Bank Rollinsford NH 
 78
 444
 
 522
 (154) 8/1/2010 1977
Citizens Bank Salem NH 
 328
 1,312
 
 1,640
 (353) 12/14/2012 1980
Citizens Bank Haddon Heights NJ 
 316
 948
 
 1,264
 (226) 7/23/2013 1965
Citizens Bank Albany NY 
 232
 1,315
 
 1,547
 (432) 8/1/2010 1960
Citizens Bank Amherst NY 
 238
 1,348
 
 1,586
 (450) 8/1/2010 1965
Citizens Bank East Aurora NY 
 162
 919
 
 1,081
 (307) 8/1/2010 1996
Citizens Bank Johnstown NY 
 163
 923
 
 1,086
 (303) 8/1/2010 1973
Citizens Bank Port Jervis NY 
 143
 811
 
 954
 (275) 8/1/2010 1995
Citizens Bank Rochester NY 
 166
 943
 
 1,109
 (315) 8/1/2010 1962
Citizens Bank Vails Gate NY 
 284
 1,610
 
 1,894
 (529) 8/1/2010 1995
Citizens Bank Whitesboro NY 
 130
 739
 
 869
 (243) 8/1/2010 1995
Citizens Bank Alliance OH 
 204
 1,156
 
 1,360
 (408) 8/1/2010 1972
Citizens Bank Boardman OH 
 280
 1,589
 
 1,869
 (561) 8/1/2010 1984
Citizens Bank Broadview Heights OH 
 201
 1,140
 
 1,341
 (386) 8/1/2010 1982
Citizens Bank Brunswick OH 
 186
 1,057
 
 1,243
 (373) 8/1/2010 2004
Citizens Bank Cleveland OH 
 239
 1,357
 
 1,596
 (479) 8/1/2010 1973
Citizens Bank Cleveland OH 
 210
 1,190
 
 1,400
 (420) 8/1/2010 1950
Citizens Bank Cleveland OH 
 182
 1,031
 
 1,213
 (364) 8/1/2010 1930
Citizens Bank Fairlawn OH 1,885
 511
 2,045
 
 2,556
 (550) 12/14/2012 1979
Citizens Bank Lakewood OH 
 196
 1,111
 
 1,307
 (365) 8/1/2010 1985
Citizens Bank Louisville OH 
 191
 1,080
 
 1,271
 (381) 8/1/2010 1960
Citizens Bank Massillon OH 
 287
 1,624
 
 1,911
 (573) 8/1/2010 1995
Citizens Bank Northfield OH 
 317
 1,797
 
 2,114
 (625) 8/1/2010 1969
Citizens Bank Parma OH 
 475
 581
 
 1,056
 (156) 12/14/2012 1971
Citizens Bank Parma Heights OH 
 426
 638
 
 1,064
 (172) 12/14/2012 1957
Citizens Bank Rocky River OH 
 283
 1,602
 
 1,885
 (526) 8/1/2010 1972
Citizens Bank South Russell OH 
 106
 957
 
 1,063
 (257) 12/14/2012 1981

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Taco Bell North Corbin KY 
 139
 1,082
 
 1,221
 (359) 6/27/2013  1986
Kentucky Fried Chicken Milwaukee WI 
 533
 1,055
 
 1,588
 (350) 6/27/2013  1978
Taco Bell Montclair CA 
 322
 900
 
 1,222
 (299) 6/27/2013  1996
Taco Bell Rubidoux CA 
 415
 1,223
 
 1,638
 (405) 6/27/2013  1992
Vacant Belton MO 
 476
 701
 
 1,177
 (233) 6/27/2013  2006
Taco Bueno Frisco TX 
 601
 577
 
 1,178
 (191) 6/27/2013  2000
Something Different Grill Lubbock TX 
 228
 561
 
 789
 (186) 6/27/2013  2000
Taco Bueno N. Richland Hills TX 
 423
 567
 
 990
 (188) 6/27/2013  2000
Texas Roadhouse Kenosha WI 
 1,061
 1,835
 (14) 2,882
 (615) 6/27/2013  2001
Tire Warehouse Fitchburg MA 
 203
 704
 
 907
 (228) 6/27/2013  1982
Tire Warehouse Bangor ME 
 289
 1,400
 
 1,689
 (454) 6/27/2013  1977
Wendy's Anniston AL 
 454
 591
 
 1,045
 (196) 6/27/2013  1976
Wendy's Birmingham AL 
 562
 990
 
 1,552
 (329) 6/27/2013  2005
Wendy's Phenix City AL 
 529
 1,178
 
 1,707
 (391) 6/27/2013  1999
Wendy's Pine Bluff AR 
 221
 1,022
 
 1,243
 (339) 6/27/2013  1989
Wendy's Stuttgart AR 
 67
 1,038
 
 1,105
 (344) 6/27/2013  2001
Vacant Cocoa FL 
 249
 567
 (591) 225
 
 6/27/2013  1979
Wendy's Indialantic FL 
 592
 614
 
 1,206
 (204) 6/27/2013  1985
Wendy's Lynn Haven FL 
 446
 852
 
 1,298
 (283) 6/27/2013  2005
Wendy's Melbourne FL 
 550
 680
 1
 1,231
 (226) 6/27/2013  1993
Wendy's New Smyrna Beach FL 
 476
 394
 
 870
 (131) 6/27/2013  1982
Wendy's Ormond Beach FL 
 626
 561
 
 1,187
 (186) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Panama City(Callaway) FL 
 461
 529
 
 990
 (175) 6/27/2013  1984
Wendy's Panama City FL 
 445
 837
 
 1,282
 (278) 6/27/2013  1987
Wendy's South Daytona FL 
 531
 432
 
 963
 (143) 6/27/2013  1980
Wendy's Tallahassee FL 
 952
 514
 
 1,466
 (170) 6/27/2013  1986
Wendy's Tallahassee FL 
 855
 505
 
 1,360
 (167) 6/27/2013  1986
Wendy's Titusville FL 
 415
 761
 
 1,176
 (252) 6/27/2013  1984
Wendy's Marietta GA 
 383
 506
 
 889
 (168) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Brunswick GA 
 306
 435
 
 741
 (144) 6/27/2013  1985
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 701
 1,787
 
 2,488
 (593) 6/27/2013  1999
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 743
 1,184
 1
 1,928
 (393) 6/27/2013  1988
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 478
 2,209
 
 2,687
 (733) 6/27/2013  2003

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Wadsworth OH 
 158
 893
 
 1,051
 (315) 8/1/2010 1960
Citizens Bank Willoughby OH 
 395
 2,239
 
 2,634
 (779) 8/1/2010 1920
Citizens Bank Aliquippa PA 
 138
 782
 
 920
 (210) 12/14/2012 1953
Citizens Bank Allison Park PA 
 314
 733
 
 1,047
 (202) 9/28/2012 1972
Citizens Bank Altoona PA 
 153
 459
 
 612
 (123) 12/14/2012 1971
Citizens Bank Ambridge PA 
 215
 1,217
 (1,282) 150
 (4) 8/1/2010 1925
Citizens Bank Ashley PA 
 225
 675
 (566) 334
 
 12/14/2012 1928
Citizens Bank Beaver Falls PA 
 138
 553
 
 691
 (153) 9/28/2012 1995
Citizens Bank Butler PA 
 286
 1,144
 
 1,430
 (308) 12/14/2012 1966
Citizens Bank Camp Hill PA 
 430
 645
 
 1,075
 (174) 12/14/2012 1971
Citizens Bank Carnegie PA 
 73
 1,396
 
 1,469
 (376) 12/14/2012 1920
Citizens Bank Dallas PA 
 213
 1,205
 
 1,418
 (332) 9/28/2012 1949
Citizens Bank Dillsburg PA 
 232
 926
 
 1,158
 (249) 12/14/2012 1935
Citizens Bank Drexel Hill PA 
 266
 1,064
 
 1,330
 (286) 12/14/2012 1950
Citizens Bank Erie PA 
 168
 671
 
 839
 (181) 12/14/2012 1954
Citizens Bank Ford City PA 
 89
 802
 (468) 423
 
 12/14/2012 1975
Citizens Bank Glenside PA 1,257
 343
 1,370
 
 1,713
 (340) 5/22/2013 1958
Citizens Bank Greensburg PA 
 45
 861
 
 906
 (232) 12/14/2012 1957
Citizens Bank Havertown PA 
 219
 875
 
 1,094
 (242) 9/28/2012 2003
Citizens Bank Highspire PA 
 216
 649
 
 865
 (175) 12/14/2012 1974
Citizens Bank Homestead PA 
 202
 807
 
 1,009
 (223) 9/28/2012 1960
Citizens Bank Kingston PA 
 404
 943
 
 1,347
 (254) 12/14/2012 1977
Citizens Bank Kittanning PA 
 56
 1,060
 
 1,116
 (285) 12/14/2012 1889
Citizens Bank Lancaster PA 
 383
 468
 
 851
 (129) 9/28/2012 1967
Citizens Bank Latrobe PA 
 148
 591
 
 739
 (159) 12/14/2012 1969
Citizens Bank Lower Burrell PA 
 180
 722
 
 902
 (194) 12/14/2012 1980
Citizens Bank Matamoras PA 
 509
 946
 
 1,455
 (254) 12/14/2012 1920
Citizens Bank Mechanicsburg PA 1,620
 288
 2,590
 
 2,878
 (715) 9/28/2012 1900
Citizens Bank Mercer PA 
 105
 314
 
 419
 (85) 12/14/2012 1964
Citizens Bank Milford PA 
 513
 769
 
 1,282
 (207) 12/14/2012 1981
Citizens Bank Monesson PA 
 198
 1,123
 (1,222) 99
 (2) 8/1/2010 1930
Citizens Bank Mount Lebanon PA 1,577
 215
 1,939
 
 2,154
 (535) 9/28/2012 1960
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Eastman GA 
 258
 473
 
 731
 (157) 6/27/2013  1996
Wendy's Lithia Springs GA 
 668
 774
 
 1,442
 (257) 6/27/2013  1988
Wendy's Sharpsburg GA 
 649
 1,299
 
 1,948
 (431) 6/27/2013  2002
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 872
 736
 
 1,608
 (244) 6/27/2013  1978
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 859
 707
 1
 1,567
 (235) 6/27/2013  1978
Wendy's Pendleton IN 
 448
 894
 1
 1,343
 (297) 6/27/2013  2005
Wendy's Louisville KY 
 834
 1,379
 
 2,213
 (457) 6/27/2013  2001
Wendy's Louisville KY 
 532
 1,221
 
 1,753
 (405) 6/27/2013  1998
Wendy's Louisville KY 
 857
 1,420
 1
 2,278
 (471) 6/27/2013  2000
Wendy's Minden LA 
 182
 936
 
 1,118
 (310) 6/27/2013  2001
Wendy's Baltimore MD 
 760
 802
 
 1,562
 (266) 6/27/2013  1995
Wendy's Baltimore MD 
 904
 1,035
 1
 1,940
 (344) 6/27/2013  2002
Wendy's Landover MD 
 340
 267
 
 607
 (89) 6/27/2013  1978
Wendy's Pasadena MD 
 1,049
 1,902
 
 2,951
 (631) 6/27/2013  1997
Wendy's District Heights MD 
 332
 275
 
 607
 (91) 6/27/2013  1979
Wendy's Madison Heights MI 
 198
 725
 (478) 445
 (50) 6/27/2013  1998
Wendy's Bellevue NE 
 338
 484
 
 822
 (161) 6/27/2013  1981
Wendy's Buckeye Lake OH 
 864
 877
 
 1,741
 (291) 6/27/2013  2000
Wendy's Hamilton OH 
 655
 1,848
 
 2,503
 (613) 6/27/2013  2001
Wendy's Hillsboro OH 
 291
 1,408
 
 1,699
 (467) 6/27/2013  1985
Wendy's Whitehall OH 
 716
 863
 
 1,579
 (286) 6/27/2013  1983
Wendy's Arlington TX 
 1,322
 1,546
 
 2,868
 (513) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Dublin VA 
 384
 1,401
 1
 1,786
 (465) 6/27/2013  1993
Wendy's Emporia VA 
 631
 1,424
 
 2,055
 (472) 6/27/2013  1994
Wendy's Hayes VA 
 304
 859
 
 1,163
 (285) 6/27/2013  1992
Wendy's Mechanicsville VA 
 521
 704
 
 1,225
 (234) 6/27/2013  1989
Wendy's Pounding Mill VA 
 296
 1,404
 
 1,700
 (466) 6/27/2013  2004
Wendy's Woodbridge VA 
 1,193
 1,598
 
 2,791
 (530) 6/27/2013  1996
Wendy's Woodbridge VA 
 521
 615
 
 1,136
 (204) 6/27/2013  1978
Wendy's Fairmont WV 
 224
 1,119
 
 1,343
 (371) 6/27/2013  1983
Wendy's Ripley WV 
 273
 871
 
 1,144
 (289) 6/27/2013  1984
Moonshine Austin TX 
 837
 1,797
 
 2,634
 (602) 6/27/2013  1998
Fresenius Medical Care Clinton NC 
 139
 2,655
 
 2,794
 (741) 6/28/2013  2003


F-102


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Fresenius Medical Care Fairmont NC 
 201
 1,819
 7
 2,027
 (508) 6/28/2013  2002
Fresenius Medical Care Fayetteville NC 
 420
 2,379
 
 2,799
 (665) 6/28/2013  1998
Fresenius Medical Care Fayetteville NC 
 134
 2,551
 87
 2,772
 (714) 6/28/2013  2004
Fresenius Medical Care Fayetteville NC 
 178
 3,379
 99
 3,656
 (945) 6/28/2013  1999
Fresenius Medical Care Lumberton NC 
 117
 2,216
 
 2,333
 (620) 6/28/2013  1986
Fresenius Medical Care Pembroke NC 
 81
 1,547
 
 1,628
 (433) 6/28/2013  2009
Fresenius Medical Care Red Springs NC 
 101
 1,913
 
 2,014
 (535) 6/28/2013  2000
Fresenius Medical Care Roseboro NC 
 74
 1,404
 
 1,478
 (393) 6/28/2013  2010
Fresenius Medical Care St. Pauls NC 
 73
 1,389
 
 1,462
 (388) 6/28/2013  2008
Kum & Go Gillette WY 
 878
 2,048
 
 2,926
 (664) 6/28/2013  2013
Dollar General Bastrop LA 
 148
 838
 
 986
 (270) 7/1/2013  2013
Dollar General Powhatan Point OH 
 138
 784
 
 922
 (252) 7/2/2013  2013
Dollar General Millwood WV 
 98
 881
 
 979
 (284) 7/2/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gretna VA 
 131
 744
 
 875
 (240) 7/2/2013  2012
Walgreens Denver CO 3,350
 
 4,050
 
 4,050
 (1,392) 7/2/2013  2008
CVS Columbia SC 2,278
 
 2,811
 
 2,811
 (822) 7/2/2013  2006
Dollar General West Union SC 
 46
 868
 
 914
 (280) 7/3/2013  2011
Fresenius Medical Care Fairhope AL 
 
 2,035
 
 2,035
 (564) 7/8/2013  2006
Fresenius Medical Care Foley AL 
 287
 2,580
 (9) 2,858
 (715) 7/8/2013  2009
Fresenius Medical Care Mobile AL 
 278
 2,505
 
 2,783
 (695) 7/8/2013  2009
Fresenius Medical Care Defuniak Springs FL 
 115
 2,180
 9
 2,304
 (605) 7/8/2013  2008
Dollar General Eagle Grove IA 
 100
 902
 
 1,002
 (290) 7/9/2013  2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 220
 880
 
 1,100
 (283) 7/9/2013  2013
Dollar General Farmington NM 
 224
 898
 
 1,122
 (289) 7/11/2013  2013
Dollar General Amarillo TX 
 198
 794
 
 992
 (256) 7/11/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mount Vernon IL 
 117
 1,050
 
 1,167
 (338) 7/11/2013  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Birch Run MI 
 81
 729
 86
 896
 (253) 7/11/2013  1950
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Crosby MN 
 49
 928
 39
 1,016
 (299) 7/11/2013  1985
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Toledo OH 
 226
 905
 
 1,131
 (291) 7/11/2013  1942
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Webster WI 
 43
 808
 
 851
 (260) 7/11/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Alderson WV 
 166
 663
 
 829
 (214) 7/11/2013  2012
Walgreens Castle Rock CO 3,953
 1,581
 3,689
 
 5,270
 (1,268) 7/11/2013  2002
Advance Auto Parts Eden NC 
 320
 746
 
 1,066
 (240) 7/16/2013  2004

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Mountain Top PA 
 111
 631
 
 742
 (170) 12/14/2012 1980
Citizens Bank Narberth PA 
 420
 2,381
 
 2,801
 (782) 8/1/2010 1935
Citizens Bank Oakmont PA 
 199
 1,127
 
 1,326
 (303) 12/14/2012 1967
Citizens Bank Oil City PA 
 110
 623
 
 733
 (168) 12/14/2012 1965
Citizens Bank Philadelphia PA 
 127
 722
 (543) 306
 (24) 12/14/2012 1920
Citizens Bank Philadelphia PA 
 266
 1,065
 
 1,331
 (287) 12/14/2012 1971
Citizens Bank Pitcairn PA 
 46
 867
 (761) 152
 
 12/14/2012 1985
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 215
 1,219
 
 1,434
 (336) 9/28/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 256
 767
 
 1,023
 (212) 9/28/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 185
 1,051
 
 1,236
 (283) 12/14/2012 1960
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 389
 1,168
 
 1,557
 (314) 12/14/2012 1940
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 146
 2,770
 
 2,916
 (745) 12/14/2012 1900
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 2,262
 470
 2,661
 
 3,131
 (716) 12/14/2012 1979
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 1,244
 516
 1,204
 
 1,720
 (324) 12/14/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 206
 1,852
 
 2,058
 (498) 12/14/2012 1923
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 918
 196
 1,110
 
 1,306
 (299) 12/14/2012 1980
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 255
 1,019
 
 1,274
 (274) 12/14/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Pittsburgh PA 
 268
 2,413
 
 2,681
 (649) 12/14/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Reading PA 
 269
 1,524
 
 1,793
 (384) 4/12/2013 1904
Citizens Bank Reading PA 
 267
 802
 
 1,069
 (216) 12/14/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Temple PA 
 268
 626
 
 894
 (173) 9/28/2012 1936
Citizens Bank Turtle Creek PA 
 308
 923
 
 1,231
 (255) 9/28/2012 1970
Citizens Bank Tyrone PA 
 146
 583
 
 729
 (157) 12/14/2012 1967
Citizens Bank Upper Darby PA 
 411
 617
 
 1,028
 (166) 12/14/2012 1966
Citizens Bank Warrendale PA 
 611
 916
 
 1,527
 (246) 12/14/2012 1981
Citizens Bank West Hazleton PA 
 279
 2,509
 
 2,788
 (692) 9/28/2012 1900
Citizens Bank Wexford PA 
 180
 719
 
 899
 (194) 12/14/2012 1975
Citizens Bank Coventry RI 
 559
 559
 
 1,118
 (154) 9/28/2012 1968
Citizens Bank Cranston RI 
 411
 1,234
 
 1,645
 (332) 12/14/2012 1967
Citizens Bank East Greenwich RI 
 227
 680
 
 907
 (183) 12/14/2012 1959
Citizens Bank Johnston RI 
 343
 1,030
 
 1,373
 (284) 9/28/2012 1972
Citizens Bank N. Providence RI 1,445
 200
 1,800
 
 2,000
 (484) 12/31/2012 1971

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Edinburg TX 
 102
 914
 
 1,016
 (294) 7/16/2013  2013
Kum & Go Muskogee OK 
 423
 1,691
 
 2,114
 (544) 7/22/2013  2013
Monro Muffler Waukesha WI 
 228
 684
 
 912
 (234) 7/23/2013  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Harrison TN 
 74
 420
 
 494
 (135) 7/23/2013  2006
SunTrust Bank Annapolis MD 
 2,653
 2,170
 
 4,823
 (669) 7/23/2013  1976
SunTrust Bank Nashville TN 
 567
 305
 
 872
 (94) 7/23/2013  1954
Dollar General Batesville AR 
 32
 285
 7
 324
 (92) 7/25/2013  1998
Dollar General Batesville AR 
 42
 374
 78
 494
 (126) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General Beebe AR 
 51
 478
 52
 581
 (155) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General Blytheville AR 
 30
 285
 50
 365
 (96) 7/25/2013  2000
Dollar General Des Arc AR 
 56
 508
 53
 617
 (171) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General Dumas AR 
 46
 412
 23
 481
 (134) 7/25/2013  2000
Dollar General Gassville AR 
 54
 325
 21
 400
 (106) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General Higden AR 
 52
 469
 80
 601
 (159) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General Lake Village AR 
 64
 362
 29
 455
 (120) 7/25/2013  1998
Dollar General Lepanto AR 
 43
 389
 
 432
 (125) 7/25/2013  1995
Dollar General Little Rock AR 
 73
 412
 13
 498
 (133) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General Marvell AR 
 40
 364
 107
 511
 (129) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General McGehee AR 
 25
 228
 29
 282
 (77) 7/25/2013  1998
Dollar General Quitman AR 
 45
 426
 
 471
 (133) 7/25/2013  2001
Dollar General Searcy AR 
 29
 263
 66
 358
 (90) 7/25/2013  1998
Dollar General Tuckerman AR 
 49
 280
 81
 410
 (101) 7/25/2013  1999
Dollar General White Hall AR 
 43
 388
 
 431
 (125) 7/25/2013  1999
FedEx Melbourne FL 
 159
 1,433
 
 1,592
 (514) 7/26/2013  2001
Rite Aid Burton MI 
 128
 2,541
 24
 2,693
 (870) 7/26/2013  1999
Rubbermaid Bowling Green OH 
 714
 13,564
 
 14,278
 (4,869) 7/29/2013  2013
Vacant Mishawaka IN 
 375
 1,500
 
 1,875
 (483) 7/30/2013  2013
Walgreens Adams MA 
 300
 1,200
 
 1,500
 (412) 7/30/2013  1958
Walgreens Wilson NC 
 573
 1,337
 
 1,910
 (459) 7/30/2013  2002
Applebee's Fall River MA 
 275
 1,558
 
 1,833
 (535) 7/31/2013  1994
Arby's Merritt Island FL 
 297
 552
 
 849
 (175) 7/31/2013  1984
Arby's Orlando FL 
 251
 585
 
 836
 (186) 7/31/2013  1985
Arby's Rockledge FL 
 381
 571
 
 952
 (181) 7/31/2013  1984

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank N. Providence RI 
 223
 892
 
 1,115
 (240) 12/14/2012 1971
Citizens Bank Providence RI 
 300
 899
 
 1,199
 (242) 12/14/2012 1960
Citizens Bank Rumford RI 
 352
 654
 
 1,006
 (176) 12/14/2012 1977
Citizens Bank Wakefield RI 
 517
 959
 
 1,476
 (265) 9/28/2012 1976
Citizens Bank Warren RI 
 328
 609
 
 937
 (168) 9/28/2012 1980
Citizens Bank Warwick RI 
 1,870
 8,828
 697
 11,395
 (2,047) 9/24/2013 1995
Citizens Bank Middlebury VT 
 363
 544
 
 907
 (146) 12/14/2012 1969
Citizens Bank St. Albans VT 
 141
 798
 
 939
 (271) 8/1/2010 1989
Coborn's Liquor Store Stanley ND 
 1,163
 5,037
 
 6,200
 (997) 2/21/2014 2014
Coborn's Liquor Store Tioga ND 
 1,065
 4,581
 
 5,646
 (717) 6/26/2014 2014
Comcast Englewood CO 
 1,490
 5,060
 
 6,550
 (1,109) 11/5/2013 1999
Community Bank Lake Mary FL 
 1,230
 1,504
 4
 2,738
 (340) 10/1/2013 1990
Community Bank Whitehall NY 
 106
 600
 
 706
 (197) 8/1/2011 1995
CompUSA Arlington TX 1,770
 2,437
 1,467
 127
 4,031
 (392) 2/7/2014 1992
ConAgra Foods Omaha NE 
 6,451
 30,697
 
 37,148
 (3,587) 3/28/2014 1989
ConAgra Foods Milton PA 16,245
 5,656
 27,242
 
 32,898
 (4,943) 2/7/2014 1991
Conn's Hurst TX 
 497
 1,990
 
 2,487
 (429) 5/19/2014 1999
Cooper Tire & Rubber Franklin��IN 15,355
 4,438
 33,994
 
 38,432
 (8,554) 11/5/2013 2009
Cost Plus La Quinta CA 
 1,211
 4,786
 
 5,997
 (997) 2/7/2014 2007
County of Yolo, CA Woodland CA 
 2,640
 13,681
 
 16,321
 (2,679) 11/5/2013 2001
Cracker Barrel Braselton GA 2,935
 1,294
 2,403
 
 3,697
 (855) 11/13/2012 2005
Cracker Barrel Bremen GA 2,677
 1,012
 2,361
 
 3,373
 (840) 11/13/2012 2006
Cracker Barrel Columbus GA 
 912
 3,153
 
 4,065
 (712) 2/7/2014 2003
Cracker Barrel Greensboro NC 
 1,632
 2,495
 
 4,127
 (584) 2/7/2014 2005
Cracker Barrel Mebane NC 2,514
 1,106
 2,054
 
 3,160
 (731) 11/13/2012 2004
Cracker Barrel Rocky Mount NC 
 1,274
 2,334
 
 3,608
 (562) 2/7/2014 2006
Cracker Barrel Fort Mill SC 
 1,301
 2,721
 
 4,022
 (644) 2/7/2014 2006
Cracker Barrel Piedmont SC 
 1,630
 2,927
 
 4,557
 (691) 2/7/2014 2005
Cracker Barrel Abilene TX 
 1,374
 2,933
 
 4,307
 (695) 2/7/2014 2005
Cracker Barrel San Antonio TX 
 1,725
 3,005
 
 4,730
 (668) 2/7/2014 2005
Cracker Barrel Sherman TX 
 557
 3,744
 
 4,301
 (847) 2/7/2014 2007
Cracker Barrel Bristol VA 
 1,241
 1,703
 
 2,944
 (489) 2/7/2014 2006

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Arby's Savannah GA 
 293
 293
 
 586
 (93) 7/31/2013  1985
Arby's Fort Wayne IN 
 529
 647
 
 1,176
 (205) 7/31/2013  1987
Arby's Winchester IN 
 341
 511
 
 852
 (162) 7/31/2013  1988
Vacant Rochester NY 
 128
 384
 (337) 175
 
 7/31/2013  1985
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 33
 
 
 33
 
 7/31/2013  -
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 63
 
 
 63
 
 7/31/2013  -
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 73
 
 
 73
 
 7/31/2013  -
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 90
 
 
 90
 
 7/31/2013 -
Burger King Sierra Vista AZ 
 260
 1,041
 
 1,301
 (330) 7/31/2013  1994
Burger King Cut Off LA 
 726
 1,088
 
 1,814
 (345) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Gonzales LA 
 380
 465
 
 845
 (148) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Lake Charles LA 
 456
 456
 
 912
 (145) 7/31/2013  1980
Burger King Lake Charles LA 
 610
 746
 
 1,356
 (237) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Metairie LA 
 728
 392
 
 1,120
 (124) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Opelousas LA 
 964
 964
 
 1,928
 (306) 7/31/2013  1978
Burger King Raceland LA 
 356
 533
 
 889
 (169) 7/31/2013  2000
Burger King Belding MI 
 221
 411
 
 632
 (130) 7/31/2013  1994
Burger King Warren MI 
 248
 745
 
 993
 (237) 7/31/2013  1987
Burger King Kansas CIty MO 
 444
 1,036
 
 1,480
 (329) 7/31/2013  1984
Burger King Asheville NC 
 728
 595
 
 1,323
 (189) 7/31/2013  1982
Burger King Irondequoit NY 
 988
 659
 
 1,647
 (209) 7/31/2013  1980
Burger King Syracuse NY 
 606
 606
 
 1,212
 (192) 7/31/2013  1986
Burger King Mansfield OH 
 191
 766
 
 957
 (243) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King New Philadelphia OH 
 419
 779
 
 1,198
 (247) 7/31/2013  1986
Cashland Celina OH 
 108
 132
 
 240
 (45) 7/31/2013  1995
Checkers Miami FL 
 621
 
 
 621
 
 7/31/2013  1993
Checkers Orlando FL 
 1,033
 
 
 1,033
 
 7/31/2013  1995
Jeremiah's Italian Ice Winter Springs FL 
 734
 
 
 734
 
 7/31/2013  1995
Chilis Amarillo TX 
 811
 1,893
 
 2,704
 (650) 7/31/2013  1984
Denny's Mesa AZ 
 1,089
 891
 
 1,980
��(306) 7/31/2013  1994
Denny's Phoenix AZ 
 825
 1,237
 
 2,062
 (425) 7/31/2013  2005
Denny's Tempe AZ 
 1,567
 844
 
 2,411
 (290) 7/31/2013  1995
Denny's Henrietta NY 
 361
 241
 
 602
 (83) 7/31/2013  1970

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Cracker Barrel Emporia VA 2,435
 972
 2,267
 
 3,239
 (807) 11/13/2012 2004
Cracker Barrel Waynesboro VA 
 1,536
 1,489
 
 3,025
 (519) 2/7/2014 2004
Cracker Barrel Woodstock VA 2,262
 928
 2,164
 
 3,092
 (770) 11/13/2012 2005
Crest Production Services Pleasanton TX 
 519
 7,949
 
 8,468
 (2,255) 6/12/2014 2013
Crozer-Keystone Health Ridley Park PA 681
 
 6,114
 
 6,114
 (1,374) 11/5/2013 1976
CVS Hoover AL 
 1,239
 2,890
 
 4,129
 (802) 5/31/2013 2003
CVS Meridianville AL 1,927
 1,045
 3,057
 
 4,102
 (721) 2/7/2014 2008
CVS Phoenix AZ 5,025
 1,511
 4,533
 4
 6,048
 (1,146) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Phoenix AZ 3,015
 901
 2,704
 15
 3,620
 (684) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS City Of Industry CA 2,500
 1,224
 3,202
 
 4,426
 (651) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Fresno CA 5,045
 1,890
 4,409
 16
 6,315
 (1,115) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Palmdale CA 5,226
 2,493
 4,630
 17
 7,140
 (1,171) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Sacramento CA 4,724
 2,163
 4,016
 19
 6,198
 (1,016) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Norwich CT 5,454
 1,998
 5,995
 15
 8,008
 (1,515) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Dover DE 2,046
 4,081
 
 
 4,081
 
 2/7/2014 2010
CVS Auburndale FL 1,565
 1,418
 2,038
 
 3,456
 (443) 2/7/2014 1999
CVS Boca Raton FL 2,625
 
 3,560
 
 3,560
 (850) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Ft. Myers FL 3,025
 2,335
 3,502
 
 5,837
 (838) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Gulf Breeze FL 1,079
 545
 
 
 545
 
 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Jacksonville FL 3,715
 2,240
 4,323
 
 6,563
 (951) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Lakeland FL 2,258
 587
 2,347
 16
 2,950
 (594) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Naples FL 2,675
 
 4,164
 
 4,164
 (914) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS New Port Richey FL 1,618
 1,149
 2,966
 
 4,115
 (637) 2/7/2014 2004
CVS St. Augustine FL 
 1,264
 3,674
 
 4,938
 (804) 2/7/2014 2008
CVS St. Cloud FL 2,626
 1,534
 1,875
 
 3,409
 (530) 4/12/2013 2002
CVS Alpharetta GA 
 572
 858
 (12) 1,418
 (263) 9/28/2012 1994
CVS Ringgold GA 1,948
 1,346
 2,939
 
 4,285
 (695) 2/7/2014 2007
CVS Stockbridge GA 
 855
 1,283
 
 2,138
 (375) 2/28/2013 1998
CVS Vidalia GA 
 368
 1,105
 
 1,473
 (341) 9/28/2012 2000
CVS Northbrook IL 25,155
 3,471
 41,765
 1,112
 46,348
 (7,467) 2/7/2014 1980
CVS Edinburgh IN 
 420
 1,530
 
 1,950
 (363) 2/24/2014 1998
CVS Evansville IN 1,850
 227
 3,060
 
 3,287
 (660) 2/7/2014 2000

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Eegee's Tucson AZ 
 357
 436
 
 793
 (138) 7/31/2013  1990
Vacant Killeen TX 
 534
 992
 (803) 723
 (115) 7/31/2013  1993
Golden Corral Texarkana TX 
 758
 3,031
 
 3,789
 (962) 7/31/2013  2001
Grandy's Dallas TX 
 725
 
 
 725
 
 7/31/2013  1981
Grandy's Dallas TX 
 357
 
 
 357
 
 7/31/2013  1984
Grandy's Greenville TX 
 847
 
 
 847
 
 7/31/2013  1979
Hardee's Jacksonville FL 
 875
 583
 
 1,458
 (185) 7/31/2013  1993
Hardee's Chester SC 
 586
 563
 
 1,149
 (157) 7/31/2013  1994
IHOP Corpus Christi TX 
 1,176
 
 
 1,176
 
 7/31/2013  1,995
Jack in the Box Sacramento CA 
 476
 1,110
 
 1,586
 (352) 7/31/2013  1991
Taqueria El Rodeo de Jalisco San Antonio TX 
 168
 206
 
 374
 (65) 7/31/2013  1965
Mattress Firm Johnstown PA 
 389
 906
 745
 2,040
 (364) 7/31/2013  1995
Monterey's Tex Mex Tulsa OK 
 135
 406
 (326) 215
 (28) 7/31/2013  2001
Mezcal Mexican Restaurant Grafton OH 
 64
 191
 
 255
 (66) 7/31/2013  1990
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Page AZ 
 66
 263
 
 329
 (84) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Dearborn MI 
 284
 528
 
 812
 (168) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Beckley WV 
 160
 131
 
 291
 (42) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Waupaca WI 
 61
 91
 35
 187
 (44) 7/31/2013  1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Huntington WV 
 190
 4
 
 194
 (1) 7/31/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bowling Green OH 
 141
 262
 
 403
 (83) 7/31/2013  1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Middleburg Hts OH 
 128
 156
 
 284
 (50) 7/31/2013  1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Sandusky OH 
 140
 171
 
 311
 (54) 7/31/2013  1982
Vacant Shamokin PA 
 54
 217
 (131) 140
 (4) 7/31/2013  1976
Popeyes Houston TX 
 295
 241
 
 536
 (76) 7/31/2013  1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Stamford TX 
 38
 115
 
 153
 (36) 7/31/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Kanab UT 
 52
 210
 
 262
 (67) 7/31/2013  1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Abbotsford WI 
 159
 195
 
 354
 (62) 7/31/2013  1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Antigo WI 
 45
 252
 100
 397
 (102) 7/31/2013  1997
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Clintonville WI 
 208
 69
 
 277
 (22) 7/31/2013  1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Eagle River WI 
 28
 159
 
 187
 (50) 7/31/2013  1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Hayward WI 
 51
 205
 
 256
 (65) 7/31/2013  1993
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Merrill WI 
 83
 531
 (100) 514
 (130) 7/31/2013  1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Neilsville WI 
 35
 106
 
 141
 (34) 7/31/2013  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Franklin IN 
 310
 2,787
 (5) 3,092
 (902) 3/29/2012 1999
CVS Mishawaka IN 2,258
 409
 4,532
 
 4,941
 (989) 2/7/2014 2007
CVS Tipton IN 
 311
 1,726
 
 2,037
 (408) 2/24/2014 1998
CVS Lawrence KS 2,908
 837
 4,392
 
 5,229
 (959) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Mandeville LA 4,020
 2,385
 2,915
 16
 5,316
 (738) 10/1/2013 2012

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Plover WI 
 85
 199
 100
 384
 (84) 7/31/2013  1995
Vacant Schofield WI 
 106
 196
 (177) 125
 (2) 7/31/2013  1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Stevens Point WI 
 130
 390
 100
 620
 (148) 7/31/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Tomahawk WI 
 35
 81
 
 116
 (26) 7/31/2013  1986
Popeyes Miami FL 
 220
 330
 
 550
 (105) 7/31/2013  1962
Popeyes Houston TX 
 111
 166
 
 277
 (53) 7/31/2013  1976
Vacant Indiana PA 
 676
 1,255
 (1,119) 812
 (10) 7/31/2013  2000
Popeyes Houston TX 
 278
 227
 
 505
 (72) 7/31/2013  1978
Quincy's Family Steakhouse Monroe NC 
 560
 458
 (246) 772
 (83) 7/31/2013  1978
Mr. & Mrs. Crab Seafood Orlando FL 
 1,286
 
 (114) 1,172
 (31) 7/31/2013  1998
Shoney's Grenada MS 
 270
 809
 
 1,079
 (257) 7/31/2013  1995
Steak 'n Shake Tampa FL 
 951
 
 785
 1,736
 (107) 7/31/2013  1999
Taco Bell Detroit MI 
 124
 704
 
 828
 (223) 7/31/2013  1989
Waffle House Cocoa FL 
 150
 279
 
 429
 (89) 7/31/2013  1986
Wendy's Batesville AR 
 155
 878
 
 1,033
 (279) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 501
 500
 1
 1,002
 (159) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 773
 773
 
 1,546
 (245) 7/31/2013  1994
Filibertos Payson AZ 
 679
 829
 (719) 789
 (46) 7/31/2013  1986
Wendy's Groton CT 
 1,099
 900
 
 1,999
 (285) 7/31/2013  1978
Wendy's Bowling Green OH 
 502
 932
 (926) 508
 (67) 7/31/2013  1994
Vacant The Dalles OR 
 201
 802
 (486) 517
 (238) 7/31/2013  1994
Vacant Anderson SC 
 734
 897
 (1,169) 462
 (34) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Greenville SC 
 516
 631
 
 1,147
 (200) 7/31/2013  1975
Wendy's N. Myrtle Beach SC 
 464
 861
 142
 1,467
 (273) 7/31/2013  1983
Vacant Spartanburg SC 
 699
 572
 (818) 453
 (13) 7/31/2013  1977
Whataburger Ingleside TX 
 1,106
 474
 
 1,580
 (150) 7/31/2013  1986
Denny's Bloomington MN 
 1,184
 
 
 1,184
 
 7/31/2013  1995
Long John Silver's / A&W Penn Hills PA 
 438
 656
 
 1,094
 (208) 7/31/2013  1993
Wendy's Port Orange FL 
 695
 569
 
 1,264
 (181) 7/31/2013  1996
Wendy's Fairburn GA 
 1,076
 1,316
 
 2,392
 (418) 7/31/2013  2002
Applebee's Auburn AL 
 1,155
 1,732
 
 2,887
 (595) 7/31/2013  1993
Applebee's Phenix City AL 
 1,488
 2,232
 
 3,720
 (766) 7/31/2013  1999
Applebee's Arvada CO 
 754
 1,760
 
 2,514
 (604) 7/31/2013  1996

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Metairie LA 4,121
 1,895
 3,519
 16
 5,430
 (890) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS New Orleans LA 3,719
 2,439
 2,439
 16
 4,894
 (618) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Slidell LA 4,355
 1,142
 4,568
 16
 5,726
 (1,155) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Hingham MA 5,695
 1,873
 5,619
 15
 7,507
 (1,420) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Malden MA 5,360
 1,757
 5,271
 14
 7,042
 (1,332) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Detroit MI 
 270
 2,427
 (5) 2,692
 (709) 2/28/2013 1999
CVS Harper Woods MI 
 499
 2,829
 
 3,328
 (827) 2/28/2013 1999
CVS Minneapolis MN 
 266
 4,693
 
 4,959
 (912) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Independence MO 
 780
 3,121
 
 3,901
 (686) 5/19/2014 2000
CVS St. Joseph MO 3,015
 1,022
 3,067
 16
 4,105
 (776) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Southaven MS 3,030
 1,849
 3,217
 
 5,066
 (830) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Southaven MS 4,270
 1,281
 4,100
 
 5,381
 (1,036) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Beaufort NC 2,781
 378
 3,404
 16
 3,798
 (861) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Charlotte NC 
 1,185
 2,176
 
 3,361
 (452) 2/7/2014 2008
CVS Eden NC 
 836
 1,450
 
 2,286
 (317) 2/7/2014 1998
CVS Kernersville NC 
 960
 1,313
 
 2,273
 (285) 2/7/2014 1998
CVS Weaverville NC 3,098
 1,998
 4,307
 
 6,305
 (1,008) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Cherry Hill NJ 
 2,255
 
 
 2,255
 
 2/7/2014 2011
CVS Edison NJ 
 3,318
 
 
 3,318
 
 2/7/2014 2008
CVS Lawrenceville NJ 5,170
 2,674
 6,412
 
 9,086
 (1,377) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Albuquerque NM 3,719
 975
 3,899
 16
 4,890
 (986) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Albuquerque NM 3,920
 1,029
 4,118
 17
 5,164
 (1,042) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Las Cruces NM 4,925
 1,295
 5,178
 17
 6,490
 (1,309) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS North Las Vegas NV 3,268
 1,374
 3,207
 
 4,581
 (998) 8/22/2012 2004
CVS Sparks NV 
 486
 5,894
 
 6,380
 (1,298) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Henrietta NY 
 965
 1,180
 (2) 2,143
 (358) 11/8/2012 1997
CVS Mineola NY 2,280
 
 5,120
 
 5,120
 (1,076) 2/7/2014 2008
CVS Warren OH 
 560
 1,622
 
 2,182
 (351) 2/7/2014 2008
CVS Oklahoma City OK 
 569
 1,609
 
 2,178
 (331) 2/7/2014 1996
CVS The Village OK 3,425
 520
 4,730
 
 5,250
 (1,026) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Tulsa OK 2,446
 950
 2,216
 16
 3,182
 (561) 10/1/2013 2010
CVS Freeland PA 982
 122
 1,096
 
 1,218
 (341) 8/8/2012 2004
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Applebee's Brighton CO 
 657
 1,972
 
 2,629
 (677) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Colorado Springs CO 
 499
 1,996
 
 2,495
 (685) 7/31/2013  1995
Applebee's Colorado Springs CO 
 629
 1,888
 
 2,517
 (648) 7/31/2013  1994
Applebee's Greeley CO 
 559
 2,235
 
 2,794
 (767) 7/31/2013  1995
Applebee's Northglenn CO 
 578
 1,734
 
 2,312
 (595) 7/31/2013  1993
Applebee's Pueblo CO 
 960
 2,879
 
 3,839
 (989) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Bradenton FL 
 2,475
 3,713
 
 6,188
 (1,275) 7/31/2013  1994
Applebee's Crestview FL 
 943
 1,752
 
 2,695
 (602) 7/31/2013  2000
Applebee's Crystal River FL 
 1,328
 2,467
 
 3,795
 (847) 7/31/2013  2001
Applebee's Davenport FL 
 1,506
 4,517
 
 6,023
 (1,551) 7/31/2013  2007
Applebee's Inverness FL 
 1,977
 2,965
 
 4,942
 (1,018) 7/31/2013  2000
Applebee's Lakeland FL 
 1,283
 2,383
 
 3,666
 (818) 7/31/2013  1997
Applebee's Lakeland FL 
 1,959
 3,638
 
 5,597
 (1,249) 7/31/2013  2000
Applebee's Largo FL 
 2,334
 3,501
 
 5,835
 (1,202) 7/31/2013  1995
Applebee's New Port Richey FL 
 1,695
 3,147
 
 4,842
 (1,081) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Riverview FL 
 1,849
 3,434
 
 5,283
 (1,180) 7/31/2013  2006
Applebee's St. Petersburg FL 
 2,329
 3,493
 
 5,822
 (1,200) 7/31/2013  1994
Applebee's Temple Terrace FL 
 2,396
 3,594
 
 5,990
 (1,234) 7/31/2013  1993
Applebee's Wesley Chapel FL 
 3,272
 3,272
 
 6,544
 (1,124) 7/31/2013  2000
Applebee's Winter Haven FL 
 2,130
 2,603
 
 4,733
 (894) 7/31/2013  1999
Applebee's Augusta GA 
 1,254
 2,329
 
 3,583
 (800) 7/31/2013  1987
Applebee's Dublin GA 
 1,171
 1,431
 
 2,602
 (491) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Evans GA 
 1,426
 2,649
 
 4,075
 (910) 7/31/2013  2004
Applebee's Milledgeville GA 
 1,174
 1,761
 
 2,935
 (605) 7/31/2013  1999
Applebee's Savannah GA 
 1,329
 2,468
 
 3,797
 (848) 7/31/2013  1994
Applebee's Boise ID 
 948
 1,761
 
 2,709
 (605) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Nampa ID 
 729
 2,915
 
 3,644
 (1,001) 7/31/2013  2000
Applebee's Pocatello ID 
 612
 1,837
 
 2,449
 (631) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Hobbs NM 
 600
 3,401
 
 4,001
 (1,168) 7/31/2013  2002
Applebee's Rio Rancho NM 
 645
 3,654
 
 4,299
 (1,255) 7/31/2013  1995
Applebee's Roswell NM 
 405
 2,295
 
 2,700
 (788) 7/31/2013  1998
Applebee's Clackamas OR 
 901
 2,103
 
 3,004
 (722) 7/31/2013  1997
Applebee's Lake Oswego OR 
 1,352
 1,652
 
 3,004
 (568) 7/31/2013  1993


F-108


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Applebee's Tualatin OR 
 1,116
 2,072
 
 3,188
 (712) 7/31/2013  2002
Applebee's Richland WA 
 1,112
 2,064
 
 3,176
 (709) 7/31/2013  2003
Applebee's Vancouver WA 
 718
 1,675
 
 2,393
 (575) 7/31/2013  2001
Arby's Apopka FL 
 464
 697
 
 1,161
 (221) 7/31/2013  1985
Arby's Atlanta GA 
 1,207
 987
 
 2,194
 (313) 7/31/2013  1984
Arby's Hopkinsville KY 
 432
 528
 
 960
 (168) 7/31/2013  1985
Arby's Grandville MI 
 1,133
 755
 1
 1,889
 (240) 7/31/2013  1982
Arby's Wyoming MI 
 1,513
 648
 
 2,161
 (206) 7/31/2013  1970
Arby's Chattanooga TN 
 201
 469
 
 670
 (149) 7/31/2013  1998
Arby's Memphis TN 
 449
 835
 
 1,284
 (265) 7/31/2013  1998
Bojangles Denver NC 
 1,013
 1,881
 
 2,894
 (597) 7/31/2013  1997
Bojangles Statesville NC 
 646
 1,937
 
 2,583
 (615) 7/31/2013  1988
Bruegger's Bagels Durham NC 
 312
 728
 
 1,040
 (231) 7/31/2013  1926
Buffalo Wild Wings Langhorne PA 
 815
 815
 
 1,630
 (280) 7/31/2013  1999
Burger King Andalusia AL 
 181
 1,025
 
 1,206
 (325) 7/31/2013  2000
Burger King Atmore AL 
 181
 723
 
 904
 (230) 7/31/2013  2000
Burger King Brewton AL 
 307
 920
 
 1,227
 (292) 7/31/2013  1993
Burger King Dothan AL 
 628
 1,167
 (14) 1,781
 (370) 7/31/2013  1983
Burger King Dothan AL 
 594
 1,104
 
 1,698
 (350) 7/31/2013  1999
Burger King Enterprise AL 
 437
 655
 
 1,092
 (208) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King Evergreen AL 
 172
 689
 
 861
 (219) 7/31/2013  1997
Burger King Monroeville AL 
 325
 604
 
 929
 (192) 7/31/2013  1997
Burger King Opp AL 
 214
 857
 
 1,071
 (272) 7/31/2013  1994
Burger King Troy AL 
 461
 1,383
 
 1,844
 (439) 7/31/2013  1984
Burger King Defuniak Springs FL 
 362
 1,087
 
 1,449
 (345) 7/31/2013  1989
Burger King Niceville FL 
 598
 399
 
 997
 (127) 7/31/2013  1994
Burger King Panama City FL 
 319
 956
 (640) 635
 (136) 7/31/2013  1998
Burger King Springfield FL 
 324
 971
 
 1,295
 (308) 7/31/2013  1995
Burger King Tallahassee FL 
 720
 720
 
 1,440
 (228) 7/31/2013  1998
Burger King Tallahassee FL 
 843
 454
 
 1,297
 (144) 7/31/2013  1980
Burger King Augusta GA 
 693
 2,080
 
 2,773
 (660) 7/31/2013  1986
Burger King Bainbridge GA 
 347
 1,042
 
 1,389
 (331) 7/31/2013  1998
Burger King Cairo GA 
 245
 981
 
 1,226
 (311) 7/31/2013  1997

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Mechanicsburg PA 3,582
 1,155
 3,465
 
 4,620
 (1,052) 11/29/2012 2008
CVS New Castle PA 
 412
 2,337
 
 2,749
 (716) 10/31/2012 1999
CVS Shippensburg PA 1,859
 351
 1,988
 
 2,339
 (582) 2/8/2013 2002
CVS Titusville PA 
 670
 683
 
 1,353
 (309) 2/7/2014 1998
CVS Towanda PA 878
 
 877
 
 877
 (248) 4/24/2013 2003
CVS Anderson SC 
 623
 1,389
 
 2,012
 (291) 2/7/2014 1998
CVS Cayce SC 
 1,750
 2,701
 
 4,451
 (651) 2/7/2014 2009
CVS Columbia SC 2,278
 
 2,811
 
 2,811
 (752) 7/2/2013 2006
CVS Greenville SC 
 169
 1,520
 
 1,689
 (445) 2/28/2013 1997
CVS Greenville SC 
 1,108
 1,816
 
 2,924
 (411) 2/7/2014 1998
CVS Piedmont SC 
 836
 1,206
 
 2,042
 (249) 2/7/2014 1998
CVS Jackson TN 3,082
 1,209
 2,822
 16
 4,047
 (714) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Knoxville TN 2,613
 1,190
 2,210
 16
 3,416
 (560) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Nashville TN 
 203
 1,148
 (4) 1,347
 (354) 9/28/2012 1996
CVS Converse TX 3,538
 1,390
 3,243
 15
 4,648
 (821) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Dumas TX 2,312
 846
 2,537
 16
 3,399
 (642) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Duncanville TX 
 670
 2,681
 
 3,351
 (594) 5/19/2014 2000
CVS Edinburg TX 
 1,179
 3,060
 
 4,239
 (697) 2/7/2014 2008
CVS Elsa TX 2,814
 915
 2,744
 16
 3,675
 (694) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Ft . Worth TX 4,147
 2,453
 3,679
 15
 6,147
 (931) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Gainesville TX 2,215
 341
 3,334
 
 3,675
 (701) 2/7/2014 2003
CVS San Antonio TX 3,806
 1,996
 2,993
 15
 5,004
 (757) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS San Antonio TX 4,422
 2,034
 3,778
 15
 5,827
 (955) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS San Antonio TX 2,660
 868
 2,605
 16
 3,489
 (660) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS San Juan TX 2,345
 610
 2,441
 16
 3,067
 (618) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Hardy VA 2,035
 686
 2,059
 
 2,745
 (571) 5/16/2013 2005
CVS Lynchburg VA 1,748
 914
 2,987
 70
 3,971
 (657) 2/7/2014 1999
CVS Madison Heights VA 1,592
 1,015
 2,589
 68
 3,672
 (561) 2/7/2014 1997
CVS Norfolk VA 2,399
 697
 2,789
 16
 3,502
 (706) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Portsmouth VA 3,367
 1,230
 3,690
 16
 4,936
 (933) 10/1/2013 2012
CVS Roanoke VA 2,269
 825
 2,474
 14
 3,313
 (626) 10/1/2013 2011
CVS Virginia Beach VA 3,114
 683
 3,868
 14
 4,565
 (978) 10/1/2013 2012

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Burger King Roswell GA 
 495
 1,156
 
 1,651
 (367) 7/31/2013  1998
Burger King Valdosta GA 
 564
 376
 
 940
 (119) 7/31/2013  1987
Burger King Des Moines IA 
 1,160
 949
 
 2,109
 (301) 7/31/2013  1987
Burger King Perry IA 
 557
 680
 
 1,237
 (216) 7/31/2013  1997
Burger King Red Oak IA 
 334
 1,002
 
 1,336
 (318) 7/31/2013  1988
Burger King Shenandoah IA 
 313
 582
 
 895
 (185) 7/31/2013  1988
Burger King Stuart IA 
 607
 911
 
 1,518
 (289) 7/31/2013  1997
Burger King Maywood IL 
 860
 1,051
 (357) 1,554
 (194) 7/31/2013  2003
Burger King Detroit MI 
 614
 331
 
 945
 (105) 7/31/2013  1988
Burger King Grand Rapids MI 
 346
 807
 
 1,153
 (256) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King Hudsonville MI 
 451
 676
 
 1,127
 (215) 7/31/2013  1988
Burger King L'Anse MI 
 32
 616
 
 648
 (196) 7/31/2013  1999
Burger King Walker MI 
 305
 711
 
 1,016
 (226) 7/31/2013  1973
Burger King Hastings MN 
 328
 608
 200
 1,136
 (211) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Clarksdale MS 
 865
 865
 
 1,730
 (275) 7/31/2013  1988
Burger King Cleveland MS 
 688
 1,606
 
 2,294
 (510) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King Greenville MS 
 573
 1,337
 
 1,910
 (424) 7/31/2013  2004
Burger King Greenville MS 
 351
 820
 
 1,171
 (260) 7/31/2013  1993
Burger King Greenwood MS 
 692
 1,038
 
 1,730
 (329) 7/31/2013  1988
Burger King Grenada MS 
 536
 805
 
 1,341
 (255) 7/31/2013  1989
Burger King Philadelphia MS 
 402
 939
 
 1,341
 (298) 7/31/2013  1993
Burger King Yazoo City MS 
 489
 909
 
 1,398
 (288) 7/31/2013  1993
Burger King Blair NE 
 272
 1,087
 
 1,359
 (345) 7/31/2013  1987
Burger King Wahoo NE 
 196
 1,109
 
 1,305
 (352) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Nashua NH 
 655
 655
 
 1,310
 (208) 7/31/2013  2008
Burger King Dayton OH 
 569
 466
 
 1,035
 (148) 7/31/2013  1990
Burger King Harrisburg PA 
 619
 412
 
 1,031
 (131) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King North Augusta SC 
 256
 1,451
 
 1,707
 (460) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King North Augusta SC 
 450
 1,050
 
 1,500
 (333) 7/31/2013  1985
Burger King Gallatin TN 
 199
 463
 
 662
 (147) 7/31/2013  1984
Burger King Laredo TX 
 684
 1,026
 
 1,710
 (325) 7/31/2013  2002
Burger King Texas City TX 
 421
 782
 300
 1,503
 (285) 7/31/2013  1984
Burger King Rhinelander WI 
 260
 606
 200
 1,066
 (192) 7/31/2013  1986

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Williamsburg VA 4,115
 907
 5,137
 16
 6,060
 (1,299) 10/1/2013 2011
Dahl's Des Moines IA 
 628
 3,947
 
 4,575
 (857) 2/7/2014 1947
Dahl's Des Moines IA 
 1,163
 1,649
 
 2,812
 (361) 2/7/2014 1959
Dahl's Des Moines IA 
 2,871
 11,761
 
 14,632
 (2,490) 2/7/2014 2011
Dahl's Johnston IA 
 3,202
 6,644
 
 9,846
 (1,444) 2/7/2014 2000
Dairy Queen Mauldin SC 
 133
 
 
 133
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Dairy Queen Alto TX 
 50
 110
 
 160
 (27) 6/27/2013 1995
Dairy Queen Pineland TX 
 40
 120
 
 160
 (30) 6/27/2013 1995
Dairy Queen Silsbee TX 
 60
 100
 
 160
 (25) 6/27/2013 1995
Dairy Queen Woodville TX 
 98
 65
 
 163
 (15) 7/31/2013 1980
DaVita Dialysis Osceola AR 
 137
 1,232
 
 1,369
 (277) 3/28/2013 2009
DaVita Dialysis Casselberry FL 
 392
 2,320
 
 2,712
 (427) 2/7/2014 2007
DaVita Dialysis Palatka FL 
 207
 1,173
 
 1,380
 (250) 6/5/2013 2013
DaVita Dialysis Sanford FL 
 530
 2,793
 
 3,323
 (478) 2/7/2014 2005
DaVita Dialysis Augusta GA 
 118
 1,818
 
 1,936
 (274) 2/7/2014 2000
DaVita Dialysis Douglasville GA 
 119
 1,858
 
 1,977
 (281) 2/7/2014 2001
DaVita Dialysis Ft. Wayne IN 
 394
 2,963
 (7) 3,350
 (471) 2/7/2014 2008
DaVita Dialysis Hiawatha KS 
 69
 1,302
 
 1,371
 (283) 5/30/2013 2012
DaVita Dialysis New Orleans LA 
 511
 2,237
 
 2,748
 (301) 9/30/2014 2010
DaVita Dialysis Allen Park MI 
 209
 1,885
 
 2,094
 (512) 12/31/2012 1955
DaVita Dialysis Grand Rapids MI 
 215
 1,794
 
 2,009
 (312) 2/7/2014 1997
DaVita Dialysis Clinton MO 
 128
 896
 
 1,024
 (168) 2/26/2014 2003
DaVita Dialysis St. Pauls NC 
 138
 1,246
 
 1,384
 (256) 8/2/2013 2006
DaVita Dialysis Akron OH 
 312
 1,994
 
 2,306
 (342) 3/31/2014 1932
DaVita Dialysis Cincinnati OH 
 219
 878
 (2) 1,095
 (197) 3/28/2013 2008
DaVita Dialysis Georgetown OH 
 125
 706
 (1) 830
 (159) 3/28/2013 2009
DaVita Dialysis Willow Grove PA 
 311
 3,886
 36
 4,233
 (616) 2/7/2014 1989
DaVita Dialysis Hartsville SC 
 126
 1,136
 
 1,262
 (247) 5/30/2013 2013
DaVita Dialysis Beeville TX 
 99
 1,879
 
 1,978
 (510) 12/31/2012 1979
DaVita Dialysis Federal Way WA 17,751
 1,929
 22,357
 
 24,286
 (7,080) 11/21/2012 2000
Del Monte Lathrop CA 
 3,414
 41,318
 526
 45,258
 (10,419) 11/5/2013 1993
Denny's Mesa AZ 
 1,089
 891
 
 1,980
 (236) 7/31/2013 1994

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Castle Dental Murfreesboro TN 
 256
 256
 
 512
 (88) 7/31/2013  1996
Checkers Jacksonville FL 
 731
 1,096
 
 1,827
 (348) 7/31/2013  1993
Chevy's Miami FL 
 1,455
 783
 
 2,238
 (269) 7/31/2013  1995
Church's Chicken Atmore AL 
 144
 574
 
 718
 (182) 7/31/2013  1976
Church's Chicken Bay Minette AL 
 134
 757
 
 891
 (240) 7/31/2013  2003
Church's Chicken Flomaton AL 
 173
 518
 
 691
 (164) 7/31/2013  1981
Church's Chicken Jackson AL 
 127
 719
 
 846
 (228) 7/31/2013  1982
Church's Chicken Orlando FL 
 254
 380
 
 634
 (121) 7/31/2013  1984
Vacant Augusta GA 
 178
 533
 (591) 120
 (9) 7/31/2013  1981
Church's Chicken Augusta GA 
 256
 597
 
 853
 (189) 7/31/2013  1976
Church's Chicken Augusta GA 
 196
 458
 
 654
 (145) 7/31/2013  1984
Church's Chicken Charleston SC 
 421
 344
 
 765
 (109) 7/31/2013  1973
Church's Chicken Charleston SC 
 500
 167
 
 667
 (53) 7/31/2013  1979
Church's Chicken Columbia SC 
 437
 437
 (486) 388
 (13) 7/31/2013  1978
Church's Chicken Columbia SC 
 231
 428
 (393) 266
 (12) 7/31/2013  1977
Church's Chicken Greenville SC 
 254
 472
 
 726
 (150) 7/31/2013  2009
Church's Chicken Greenville SC 
 325
 487
 (458) 354
 (15) 7/31/2013  1984
Church's Chicken North Charleston SC 
 302
 302
 
 604
 (96) 7/31/2013  1976
Church's Chicken North Charleston SC 
 407
 407
 
 814
 (129) 7/31/2013  1977
Church's Chicken Orangeburg SC 
 407
 271
 (299) 379
 (12) 7/31/2013  1985
Church's Chicken Spartanburg SC 
 350
 525
 (432) 443
 (18) 7/31/2013  1978
Dairy Queen Woodville TX 
 98
 65
 
 163
 (21) 7/31/2013  1980
Denny's Scottsdale AZ 
 736
 491
 
 1,227
 (169) 7/31/2013  1980
Fazoli's Carmel IN 
 427
 522
 
 949
 (166) 7/31/2013  1986
Golden Corral Wichita KS 
 560
 1,306
 
 1,866
 (414) 7/31/2013  2000
Golden Corral Baytown TX 
 596
 1,788
 
 2,384
 (567) 7/31/2013  1998
Hardee's Bremen GA 
 129
 518
 
 647
 (164) 7/31/2013  1980
Hardee's Akron OH 
 207
 483
 
 690
 (153) 7/31/2013  1990
Hardee's Jefferson OH 
 242
 363
 
 605
 (115) 7/31/2013  1989
Hardee's Minerva OH 
 214
 321
 
 535
 (102) 7/31/2013  1990
Hardee's Seville OH 
 151
 454
 
 605
 (144) 7/31/2013  1989
Hardee's Morristown TN 
 353
 431
 
 784
 (137) 7/31/2013  1991
Hardee's Springfield TN 
 343
 515
 
 858
 (163) 7/31/2013  1990

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Denny's Peoria AZ 
 310
 457
 
 767
 (119) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Phoenix AZ 
 825
 1,237
 
 2,062
 (328) 7/31/2013 2005
Denny's Scottsdale AZ 
 736
 491
 
 1,227
 (130) 7/31/2013 1980
Denny's Tempe AZ 
 378
 245
 
 623
 (60) 6/27/2013 1980
Denny's Tempe AZ 
 1,567
 844
 
 2,411
 (224) 7/31/2013 1995
Denny's Idaho Falls ID 
 196
 432
 
 628
 (100) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Merriam KS 
 390
 1,150
 
 1,540
 (294) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Topeka KS 
 630
 446
 
 1,076
 (114) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Bloomington MN 
 1,184
 
 
 1,184
 
 7/31/2013 1995
Denny's Branson MO 
 620
 2,209
 
 2,829
 (565) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Kansas City MO 
 750
 686
 
 1,436
 (175) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's N. Kansas City MO 
 630
 937
 
 1,567
 (240) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Sedalia MO 
 500
 783
 
 1,283
 (200) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Black Mountain NC 
 210
 505
 
 715
 (129) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Mooresville NC 
 250
 841
 
 1,091
 (215) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Henrietta NY 
 361
 241
 
 602
 (64) 7/31/2013 1970
Denny's Watertown NY 
 330
 1,107
 
 1,437
 (283) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Fremont OH 
 320
 975
 
 1,295
 (249) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Marion OH 
 115
 390
 
 505
 (102) 6/27/2013 1989
Denny's Ontario OR 
 240
 1,067
 
 1,307
 (273) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Greenville SC 
 570
 554
 
 1,124
 (142) 6/27/2013 1995
Denny's Pasadena TX 
 500
 1,316
 
 1,816
 (336) 6/27/2013 1995
Dick's Sporting Goods Fort Gratiot MI 
 722
 7,743
 
 8,465
 (1,680) 2/7/2014 2010
Dick's Sporting Goods Moore OK 
 1,243
 10,426
 13
 11,682
 (2,224) 2/7/2014 2012
Dick's Sporting Goods Charleston SC 
 3,733
 5,025
 
 8,758
 (1,128) 2/7/2014 2005
Dick's Sporting Goods Jackson TN 
 1,346
 6,106
 
 7,452
 (1,314) 2/7/2014 2007
DJO, LLC Vista CA 
 3,732
 16,868
 
 20,600
 (8,012) 8/15/2014 2006
Dollar General Andalusia AL 
 317
 914
 
 1,231
 (85) 7/24/2014 2014
Dollar General Birmingham AL 
 156
 882
 
 1,038
 (261) 6/6/2012 2012
Dollar General Bremen AL 
 59
 1,017
 
 1,076
 (165) 9/29/2014 2014
Dollar General Butler AL 
 338
 1,093
 
 1,431
 (235) 3/28/2014 2014
Dollar General Childersburg AL 
 328
 986
 
 1,314
 (217) 2/7/2014 2013

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
America's PowerSports, Inc. Round Rock TX 
 1,688
 9,563
 
 11,251
 (3,284) 7/31/2013  2008
IHOP Baytown TX 
 698
 1,297
 
 1,995
 (412) 7/31/2013  1998
Jack in the Box Cleburne TX 
 291
 1,647
 
 1,938
 (523) 7/31/2013  2000
Jack in the Box Missouri City TX 
 451
 837
 
 1,288
 (266) 7/31/2013  1991
Hooters Grand Prairie TX 
 997
 2,327
 250
 3,574
 (817) 7/31/2013  2001
Johnny Carinos Midland TX 
 998
 2,329
 
 3,327
 (800) 7/31/2013  2000
Cork & Pig San Angelo TX 
 769
 2,306
 43
 3,118
 (798) 7/31/2013  2005
Taco Bell / KFC Texarkana AR 
 111
 630
 
 741
 (200) 7/31/2013  1980
Kentucky Fried Chicken Dolton IL 
 167
 946
 
 1,113
 (300) 7/31/2013  1975
Kentucky Fried Chicken Elmhurst IL 
 242
 969
 
 1,211
 (307) 7/31/2013  1990
Kentucky Fried Chicken Hazel Crest IL 
 153
 1,376
 
 1,529
 (437) 7/31/2013  1982
Kentucky Fried Chicken Homewood IL 
 660
 1,541
 
 2,201
 (489) 7/31/2013  1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken Matteson IL 
 399
 2,259
 
 2,658
 (717) 7/31/2013  1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken Mattoon IL 
 113
 1,019
 
 1,132
 (323) 7/31/2013  1973
Taco Bell / KFC Oak Forest IL 
 185
 1,047
 
 1,232
 (332) 7/31/2013  1955
Kentucky Fried Chicken Rockford IL 
 201
 1,142
 
 1,343
 (362) 7/31/2013  1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Springfield IL 
 267
 1,068
 
 1,335
 (339) 7/31/2013  1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken Springfield IL 
 212
 1,203
 
 1,415
 (382) 7/31/2013  1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken Westchester IL 
 238
 952
 
 1,190
 (302) 7/31/2013  1973
Taco Bell Crawfordsville IN 
 234
 934
 
 1,168
 (296) 7/31/2013  1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken Frankfort IN 
 99
 893
 
 992
 (283) 7/31/2013  1985
Taco Bell Hartford City IN 
 99
 889
 
 988
 (282) 7/31/2013  1978
Taco Bell Kokomo IN 
 199
 798
 
 997
 (253) 7/31/2013  1993
Taco Bell Lafayette IN 
 304
 912
 
 1,216
 (290) 7/31/2013  1990
Kentucky Fried Chicken Lebanon IN 
 337
 1,348
 
 1,685
 (428) 7/31/2013  1983
Taco Bell Noblesville IN 
 363
 545
 
 908
 (173) 7/31/2013  2005
Taco Bell Tipton IN 
 104
 936
 
 1,040
 (297) 7/31/2013  1998
Taco Bell / KFC Minden LA 
 274
 639
 
 913
 (203) 7/31/2013  1995
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 343
 514
 
 857
 (163) 7/31/2013  1995
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 616
 753
 
 1,369
 (239) 7/31/2013  1995
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 427
 522
 
 949
 (166) 7/31/2013  1997
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 352
 528
 
 880
 (168) 7/31/2013  1998
Taco Bell / KFC Mount Pleasant TX 
 106
 952
 
 1,058
 (302) 7/31/2013  1992

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Chunchula AL 
 174
 697
 
 871
 (210) 4/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Cullman AL 
 331
 780
 
 1,111
 (168) 3/28/2014 2013
Dollar General Cullman AL 
 221
 861
 
 1,082
 (127) 9/26/2014 2014
Dollar General Frisco City AL 
 121
 836
 
 957
 (184) 2/26/2014 2014
Dollar General Gardendale AL 
 142
 805
 
 947
 (235) 8/9/2012 2012
Dollar General Hartselle AL 
 473
 983
 
 1,456
 (217) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Headland AL 
 387
 1,091
 
 1,478
 (171) 8/13/2014 2014
Dollar General Mobile AL 
 207
 1,039
 
 1,246
 (226) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Moulton AL 
 517
 1,207
 
 1,724
 (363) 4/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Mt. Vernon AL 
 260
 1,402
 
 1,662
 (307) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Ohatchee AL 
 97
 942
 
 1,039
 (163) 4/17/2014 2014
Dollar General Phenix City AL 
 267
 929
 
 1,196
 (200) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Phenix City AL 
 386
 1,104
 
 1,490
 (242) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Red Level AL 300
 120
 680
 
 800
 (214) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Sylacauga AL 
 120
 968
 
 1,088
 (208) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Tarrant AL 
 217
 869
 
 1,086
 (269) 12/12/2011 2011
Dollar General Troy AL 
 67
 963
 
 1,030
 (209) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Tuscaloosa AL 300
 133
 756
 
 889
 (234) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Vance AL 
 191
 731
 
 922
 (157) 3/28/2014 2014
Dollar General Ash Flat AR 
 44
 132
 (2) 174
 (39) 6/19/2012 1997
Dollar General Batesville AR 
 32
 285
 7
 324
 (71) 7/25/2013 1998
Dollar General Batesville AR 
 42
 374
 26
 442
 (94) 7/25/2013 1999
Dollar General Beebe AR 
 51
 478
 
 529
 (117) 7/25/2013 1999
Dollar General Bella Vista AR 
 129
 302
 
 431
 (94) 11/10/2011 2005
Dollar General Bergman AR 
 113
 639
 
 752
 (188) 7/2/2012 2011
Dollar General Blytheville AR 
 30
 285
 
 315
 (70) 7/25/2013 2000
Dollar General Carlisle AR 
 13
 245
 (2) 256
 (76) 11/10/2011 2005
Dollar General Des Arc AR 
 56
 508
 53
 617
 (128) 7/25/2013 1999
Dollar General Dumas AR 
 46
 412
 24
 482
 (103) 7/25/2013 2000
Dollar General Flippin AR 
 53
 64
 (1) 116
 (19) 6/19/2012 1994
Dollar General Gassville AR 
 54
 325
 
 379
 (80) 7/25/2013 1999
Dollar General Green Forest AR 
 52
 303
 
 355
 (94) 11/10/2011 2005

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Taco Bell / KFC New Boston TX 
 125
 1,127
 
 1,252
 (358) 7/31/2013  1995
Taco Bell / KFC Green Bay WI 
 470
 574
 
 1,044
 (182) 7/31/2013  1986
Taco Bell / KFC Dunkirk NY 
 800
 978
 
 1,778
 (310) 7/31/2013  2000
Taco Bell / KFC Geneva NY 
 569
 695
 
 1,264
 (221) 7/31/2013  1999
Taco Bell / KFC Canonsburg PA 
 176
 1,586
 
 1,762
 (503) 7/31/2013  1996
Logan's Roadhouse Owasso OK 
 1,449
 2,173
 (567) 3,055
 (447) 7/31/2013  2006
Long John Silver's / A&W Merced CA 
 174
 695
 
 869
 (221) 7/31/2013  1982
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Eatonton GA 
 353
 353
 
 706
 (112) 7/31/2013  1988
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Greensboro GA 
 569
 465
 
 1,034
 (148) 7/31/2013  1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Salisbury MD 
 245
 734
 
 979
 (233) 7/31/2013  1983
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Norwalk OH 
 77
 115
 
 192
 (37) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Batesburg SC 
 261
 484
 
 745
 (154) 7/31/2013  1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cheraw SC 
 415
 507
 
 922
 (161) 7/31/2013  1984
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Columbia SC 
 881
 588
 
 1,469
 (186) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Edgefield SC 
 221
 410
 
 631
 (130) 7/31/2013  1986
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Pageland SC 
 344
 420
 
 764
 (133) 7/31/2013  1999
Pizza Hut/WingStreet St. George SC 
 367
 245
 
 612
 (78) 7/31/2013  1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Saluda SC 
 346
 346
 
 692
 (110) 7/31/2013  1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Santee SC 
 371
 248
 
 619
 (79) 7/31/2013  1972
Pizza Hut/WingStreet West Columbia SC 
 507
 415
 
 922
 (132) 7/31/2013  1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Amarillo TX 
 339
 1,016
 
 1,355
 (323) 7/31/2013  1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Amarillo TX 
 254
 1,015
 
 1,269
 (322) 7/31/2013  1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Fort Stockton TX 
 252
 1,007
 
 1,259
 (319) 7/31/2013  2008
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Midland TX 
 414
 506
 
 920
 (161) 7/31/2013  1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Midland TX 
 506
 619
 
 1,125
 (196) 7/31/2013  1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Monahans TX 
 361
 671
 
 1,032
 (213) 7/31/2013  1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 456
 847
 
 1,303
 (269) 7/31/2013  1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 588
 882
 
 1,470
 (280) 7/31/2013  1972
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 572
 572
 
 1,144
 (182) 7/31/2013  1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 627
 766
 
 1,393
 (243) 7/31/2013  1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 457
 685
 
 1,142
 (217) 7/31/2013  1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Pecos TX 
 387
 719
 
 1,106
 (228) 7/31/2013  1974
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Ashland VA 
 589
 1,093
 (362) 1,320
 (27) 7/31/2013  1989

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Higden AR 
 52
 469
 75
 596
 (117) 7/25/2013 1995
Dollar General Lake Village AR 
 64
 362
 29
 455
 (91) 7/25/2013 1995
Dollar General Lepanto AR 
 43
 389
 
 432
 (97) 7/25/2013 1995
Dollar General Little Rock AR 
 73
 412
 13
 498
 (103) 7/25/2013 1995
Dollar General Marvell AR 
 40
 364
 107
 511
 (90) 7/25/2013 1995
Dollar General Maynard AR 
 73
 654
 
 727
 (185) 12/4/2012 1995
Dollar General Mcgehee AR 
 25
 228
 29
 282
 (57) 7/25/2013 1998
Dollar General Quitman AR 
 45
 426
 
 471
 (103) 7/25/2013 2001
Dollar General Searcy AR 
 29
 263
 12
 304
 (66) 7/25/2013 1998
Dollar General Tuckerman AR 
 49
 280
 80
 409
 (70) 7/25/2013 1999
Dollar General White Hall AR 
 43
 388
 
 431
 (97) 7/25/2013 1999
Dollar General Wooster AR 
 74
 664
 
 738
 (187) 12/4/2012 1995
Dollar General Grand Ridge FL 300
 76
 684
 
 760
 (212) 12/30/2011 2010
Dollar General Kissimmee FL 970
 643
 1,071
 
 1,714
 (213) 2/7/2014 2011
Dollar General Lakeland FL 
 413
 1,810
 
 2,223
 (385) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Molino FL 400
 178
 1,007
 
 1,185
 (317) 10/31/2011 2011
Dollar General Palatka FL 
 113
 1,196
 
 1,309
 (244) 5/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Panama City FL 
 139
 312
 
 451
 (83) 6/19/2012 1987
Dollar General Guyton GA 
 213
 852
 
 1,065
 (217) 6/3/2013 2011
Dollar General Lyerly GA 
 251
 992
 
 1,243
 (213) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Shiloh GA 
 150
 743
 
 893
 (168) 8/13/2014 2014
Dollar General Thomaston GA 
 308
 972
 
 1,280
 (213) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Cedar Falls IA 
 96
 862
 
 958
 (212) 8/28/2013 2013
Dollar General Center Point IA 
 136
 772
 
 908
 (218) 12/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Chariton IA 
 165
 934
 
 1,099
 (272) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Eagle Grove IA 
 100
 902
 
 1,002
 (226) 7/9/2013 2013
Dollar General Estherville IA 
 226
 903
 
 1,129
 (259) 10/25/2012 2012
Dollar General Hampton IA 
 188
 751
 
 939
 (229) 2/1/2012 2012
Dollar General Lake Mills IA 
 81
 728
 
 809
 (222) 2/1/2012 2012
Dollar General Nashua IA 
 136
 768
 
 904
 (222) 9/6/2012 2012
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bedford VA 
 548
 670
 (271) 947
 (16) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Chester VA 
 473
 1,104
 
 1,577
 (350) 7/31/2013  1983
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Christiansburg VA 
 494
 918
 (310) 1,102
 (23) 7/31/2013  1982
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Clifton Forge VA 
 287
 861
 (271) 877
 (22) 7/31/2013  1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Colonial Heights VA 
 311
 311
 (119) 503
 (8) 7/31/2013  1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Hampton VA 
 641
 345
 (137) 849
 (9) 7/31/2013  1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Hopewell VA 
 707
 864
 (295) 1,276
 (22) 7/31/2013  1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Newport News VA 
 394
 591
 
 985
 (188) 7/31/2013  1969
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Newport News VA 
 394
 591
 
 985
 (188) 7/31/2013  1970
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Petersburg VA 
 378
 701
 (216) 863
 (18) 7/31/2013  1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Richmond VA 
 666
 814
 (277) 1,203
 (20) 7/31/2013  1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Richmond VA 
 311
 311
 (126) 496
 (8) 7/31/2013  1991
Popeyes Jacksonville FL 
 781
 955
 
 1,736
 (303) 7/31/2013  1955
Popeyes Lakeland FL 
 830
 830
 
 1,660
 (263) 7/31/2013  1999
Popeyes Orlando FL 
 782
 955
 
 1,737
 (303) 7/31/2013  2004
Popeyes Eunice LA 
 382
 891
 
 1,273
 (283) 7/31/2013  1986
Popeyes Ferguson MO 
 128
 383
 
 511
 (122) 7/31/2013  1984
Popeyes St. Louis MO 
 288
 431
 
 719
 (137) 7/31/2013  1978
Popeyes Omaha NE 
 343
 515
 
 858
 (163) 7/31/2013  1996
Popeyes Omaha NE 
 264
 615
 
 879
 (195) 7/31/2013  1985
Popeyes Nederland TX 
 445
 668
 
 1,113
 (212) 7/31/2013  1988
Popeyes Orange TX 
 456
 847
 
 1,303
 (269) 7/31/2013  1984
Rally's Indianapolis IN 
 1,168
 
 
 1,168
 
 7/31/2013  2005
Rally's Indianapolis IN 
 1,168
 
 
 1,168
 
 7/31/2013  2005
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Venice FL 
 338
 507
 
 845
 (174) 7/31/2013  1978
TGI Fridays Royal Palm Beach FL 
 1,530
 1,530
 
 3,060
 (525) 7/31/2013  2001
TGI Fridays Ann Arbor MI 
 547
 1,640
 
 2,187
 (563) 7/31/2013  1998
TGI Fridays Kentwood MI 
 281
 2,533
 
 2,814
 (870) 7/31/2013  1983
TGI Fridays Novi MI 
 1,042
 1,042
 
 2,084
 (358) 7/31/2013  1994
Wild Bill's Sports Salon Rochester MN 
 1,347
 1,102
 
 2,449
 (378) 7/31/2013  1993
China Town Buffet Bismarck ND 
 1,038
 1,928
 
 2,966
 (662) 7/31/2013  2000
Taco Bell Albertville AL 
 419
 778
 
 1,197
 (247) 7/31/2013  2000
Taco Bell Dora AL 
 348
 813
 (797) 364
 
 7/31/2013  1995

F-114



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Taco Bell Warrior AL 
 364
 675
 (701) 338
 
 7/31/2013  1996
Taco Bell Winfield AL 
 278
 834
 
 1,112
 (265) 7/31/2013  2008
Taco Bell Suisun City CA 
 355
 1,419
 
 1,774
 (450) 7/31/2013  1986
Taco Bell Marion IN 
 496
 921
 
 1,417
 (292) 7/31/2013  1994
Vacant Dayton OH 
 129
 732
 (786) 75
 
 7/31/2013  1995
Qdoba Mexican Grill Hutchinson KS 
 561
 841
 
 1,402
 (267) 7/31/2013  2000
Taco Bueno Arlington TX 
 597
 895
 
 1,492
 (284) 7/31/2013  2000
Burger King Waco TX 
 595
 892
 (842) 645
 (16) 7/31/2013  1995
TitleMax Gainesville GA 
 221
 270
 
 491
 (93) 7/31/2013  2007
Tumbleweed Terre Haute IN 
 434
 1,303
 
 1,737
 (448) 7/31/2013  1997
Tumbleweed Louisville KY 
 468
 1,404
 
 1,872
 (482) 7/31/2013  2001
Tumbleweed Maysville KY 
 353
 823
 
 1,176
 (283) 7/31/2013  2000
Tumbleweed Owensboro KY 
 355
 1,420
 
 1,775
 (488) 7/31/2013  1997
Tumbleweed Bellefontaine OH 
 234
 938
 
 1,172
 (322) 7/31/2013  1999
Tumbleweed Springfield OH 
 549
 1,280
 
 1,829
 (440) 7/31/2013  1998
Tumbleweed Wooster OH 
 342
 799
 
 1,141
 (274) 7/31/2013  1997
Tumbleweed Zanesville OH 
 639
 1,491
 
 2,130
 (512) 7/31/2013  1998
Wendy's Auburn AL 
 718
 1,333
 1
 2,052
 (423) 7/31/2013  2000
Wendy's Fayetteville AR 
 463
 463
 
 926
 (147) 7/31/2013  1989
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 532
 650
 
 1,182
 (206) 7/31/2013  1978
Wendy's Orange CT 
 1,343
 1,641
 
 2,984
 (521) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Lake Wales FL 
 975
 1,462
 
 2,437
 (464) 7/31/2013  1999
Wendy's Merritt Island FL 
 720
 589
 
 1,309
 (187) 7/31/2013  1990
Wendy's Ormond Beach FL 
 503
 503
 
 1,006
 (160) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Titusville FL 
 414
 770
 
 1,184
 (244) 7/31/2013  1996
Wendy's Albany GA 
 414
 1,656
 
 2,070
 (525) 7/31/2013  1995
Vacant Hogansville GA 
 240
 1,359
 (1,081) 518
 (25) 7/31/2013  1985
Wendy's Morrow GA 
 755
 922
 
 1,677
 (293) 7/31/2013  1990
Wendy's Savannah GA 
 720
 720
 
 1,440
 (229) 7/31/2013  2001
Wendy's Bourbonnais IL 
 346
 1,039
 
 1,385
 (330) 7/31/2013  1993
Wendy's Joliet IL 
 642
 963
 
 1,605
 (306) 7/31/2013  1977
Wendy's Kankakee IL 
 250
 1,419
 
 1,669
 (450) 7/31/2013  2005
Wendy's Mokena IL 
 665
 997
 
 1,662
 (316) 7/31/2013  1992

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Ottumwa IA 
 143
 812
 
 955
 (226) 1/31/2013 2012
Dollar General Altamont IL 
 211
 844
 
 1,055
 (256) 3/9/2012 2012
Dollar General Carthage IL 
 48
 908
 
 956
 (264) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Desoto IL 
 138
 784
 
 922
 (211) 3/26/2013 2013
Dollar General Fairbury IL 
 96
 867
 
 963
 (221) 6/7/2013 2013
Dollar General Galatia IL 
 87
 1,008
 
 1,095
 (144) 7/29/2014 2014
Dollar General Henry IL 
 104
 934
 
 1,038
 (243) 5/23/2013 2013
Dollar General Jacksonville IL 
 145
 823
 
 968
 (240) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Jonesboro IL 
 77
 309
 
 386
 (97) 11/10/2011 2007
Dollar General Lexington IL 
 100
 899
 
 999
 (260) 9/21/2012 2012
Dollar General Mackinaw IL 
 149
 1,011
 
 1,160
 (223) 2/25/2014 2013
Dollar General Mahomet IL 
 292
 877
 
 1,169
 (215) 8/22/2013 2013
Dollar General Marion IL 
 153
 867
 
 1,020
 (251) 9/24/2012 1995
Dollar General Minonk IL 
 56
 1,034
 
 1,090
 (152) 7/2/2014 2014
Dollar General Mount Morris IL 
 97
 877
 
 974
 (247) 12/17/2012 2012
Dollar General Park Forest IL 
 390
 1,036
 
 1,426
 (141) 8/1/2014 2013
Dollar General Pittsburg IL 
 97
 915
 
 1,012
 (196) 3/31/2014 2014
Dollar General Rockford IL 
 464
 597
 27
 1,088
 (97) 6/18/2014 2014
Dollar General Roodhouse IL 
 207
 829
 
 1,036
 (234) 12/31/2012 1995
Dollar General Savanna IL 
 273
 1,093
 
 1,366
 (308) 12/31/2012 2012
Dollar General South Pekin IL 
 104
 933
 
 1,037
 (229) 8/14/2013 2013
Dollar General Bainbridge IN 
 131
 765
 
 896
 (111) 9/22/2014 2010
Dollar General Medaryville IN 
 96
 914
 
 1,010
 (212) 7/31/2014 2014
Dollar General Monroeville IN 
 112
 636
 
 748
 (197) 12/22/2011 2011
Dollar General Porter IN 
 243
 995
 
 1,238
 (97) 5/29/2014 2014
Dollar General Rensselaer IN 
 111
 957
 
 1,068
 (157) 7/30/2014 2014
Dollar General Richland IN 
 156
 887
 
 1,043
 (96) 4/30/2014 2014
Dollar General Schneider IN 
 124
 1,010
 
 1,134
 (143) 9/17/2014 2014
Dollar General Auburn KS 
 42
 801
 
 843
 (233) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Cottonwood Falls KS 
 89
 802
 
 891
 (234) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Erie KS 
 42
 790
 
 832
 (230) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Garden City KS 
 136
 771
 
 907
 (225) 8/31/2012 2010

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 505
 757
 
 1,262
 (240) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 584
 713
 
 1,297
 (226) 7/31/2013  1976
Wendy's Connersville IN 
 324
 1,298
 
 1,622
 (412) 7/31/2013  1989
Wendy's Richmond IN 
 735
 1,716
 
 2,451
 (544) 7/31/2013  1989
Wendy's Richmond IN 
 661
 992
 
 1,653
 (315) 7/31/2013  1989
Popeyes Eatontown NJ 
 651
 796
 
 1,447
 (253) 7/31/2013  1987
Wendy's Auburn NY 
 465
 1,085
 
 1,550
 (344) 7/31/2013  1977
Wendy's Binghamton NY 
 293
 879
 
 1,172
 (279) 7/31/2013  1978
Wendy's Corning NY 
 191
 1,717
 
 1,908
 (545) 7/31/2013  1996
Wendy's Cortland NY 
 635
 952
 
 1,587
 (302) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Endicott NY 
 313
 1,253
 
 1,566
 (398) 7/31/2013  1987
Wendy's Horseheads NY 
 72
 1,369
 
 1,441
 (434) 7/31/2013  1982
Wendy's Owego NY 
 101
 1,915
 
 2,016
 (608) 7/31/2013  1989
Wendy's Centerville OH 
 615
 1,434
 
 2,049
 (455) 7/31/2013  1997
Wendy's Cincinnati OH 
 939
 1,408
 
 2,347
 (447) 7/31/2013  1980
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 723
 1,343
 
 2,066
 (426) 7/31/2013  1977
Wendy's Fairborn OH 
 629
 1,468
 
 2,097
 (466) 7/31/2013  1999
Wendy's Fairborn OH 
 604
 1,408
 
 2,012
 (447) 7/31/2013  1992
Wendy's Fairfield OH 
 794
 970
 1
 1,765
 (308) 7/31/2013  1981
Wendy's Hamilton OH 
 908
 1,362
 
 2,270
 (432) 7/31/2013  2002
Wendy's Lancaster OH 
 552
 1,025
 
 1,577
 (325) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Miamisburg OH 
 888
 1,086
 
 1,974
 (345) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Middletown OH 
 755
 1,133
 
 1,888
 (359) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Middletown OH 
 752
 920
 
 1,672
 (292) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's Middletown OH 
 494
 1,481
 
 1,975
 (470) 7/31/2013  1977
Wendy's Saint Bernard OH 
 432
 1,009
 
 1,441
 (320) 7/31/2013  1985
Wendy's Springboro OH 
 891
 1,336
 
 2,227
 (424) 7/31/2013  1982
Wendy's West Carrollton OH 
 708
 865
 
 1,573
 (275) 7/31/2013  1979
Wendy's West Chester OH 
 944
 772
 
 1,716
 (245) 7/31/2013  1982
Wendy's West Chester OH 
 616
 924
 
 1,540
 (293) 7/31/2013  2005
Wendy's Wintersville OH 
 621
 1,449
 1
 2,071
 (460) 7/31/2013  1977
Wendy's Enid OK 
 158
 893
 
 1,051
 (284) 7/31/2013  2003
Wendy's Ponca City OK 
 529
 983
 
 1,512
 (312) 7/31/2013  1979

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Harper KS 
 91
 818
 
 909
 (238) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Humboldt KS 
 44
 828
 
 872
 (241) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Kingman KS 
 142
 804
 
 946
 (234) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Medicine Lodge KS 
 40
 765
 
 805
 (223) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Minneapolis KS 
 43
 816
 
 859
 (238) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Pomona KS 
 42
 796
 
 838
 (232) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Sedan KS 
 42
 792
 
 834
 (231) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Syracuse KS 
 43
 817
 
 860
 (238) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Berea KY 
 138
 781
 
 919
 (203) 5/30/2013 2012
Dollar General Coldiron KY 
 187
 747
 
 934
 (194) 5/30/2013 2013
Dollar General East Bernstadt KY 
 141
 799
 
 940
 (208) 5/30/2013 2012
Dollar General Eubank KY 
 137
 775
 
 912
 (201) 5/30/2013 2013
Dollar General Monticello KY 
 251
 867
 
 1,118
 (181) 4/25/2014 2012
Dollar General Nancy KY 
 81
 733
 
 814
 (220) 4/26/2012 2011
Dollar General Whitesburg KY 
 211
 845
 
 1,056
 (220) 5/30/2013 2012
Dollar General Bastrop LA 
 148
 838
 
 986
 (210) 7/1/2013 2013
Dollar General Choudrant LA 300
 83
 745
 
 828
 (228) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Converse LA 
 84
 756
 
 840
 (218) 9/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Doyline LA 
 88
 793
 
 881
 (226) 11/27/2012 2012
Dollar General Gardner LA 
 138
 784
 
 922
 (238) 3/8/2012 2012
Dollar General Grambling LA 
 597
 719
 
 1,316
 (165) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Jonesville LA 
 103
 929
 
 1,032
 (269) 9/27/2012 2012
Dollar General Keithville LA 
 83
 750
 
 833
 (220) 7/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Lake Charles LA 
 102
 919
 
 1,021
 (281) 2/29/2012 2012
Dollar General Lake Charles LA 
 406
 770
 
 1,176
 (169) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Mangham LA 300
 40
 759
 
 799
 (232) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Monroe LA 400
 97
 869
 
 966
 (265) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Mount Hermon LA 400
 94
 842
 
 936
 (257) 2/6/2012 2009
Dollar General New Iberia LA 
 315
 736
 
 1,051
 (221) 4/26/2012 2011
Dollar General Patterson LA 
 259
 1,035
 
 1,294
 (311) 4/26/2012 2011
Dollar General Sarepta LA 
 131
 743
 
 874
 (217) 8/9/2012 2011
Dollar General St. Martinville LA 
 175
 1,028
 
 1,203
 (225) 2/7/2014 2012

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Sayre PA 
 372
 1,115
 
 1,487
 (354) 7/31/2013  1994
Wendy's Brentwood TN 
 339
 1,356
 
 1,695
 (430) 7/31/2013  1982
Wendy's Crossville TN 
 190
 760
 
 950
 (241) 7/31/2013  1978
Wendy's Manchester TN 
 245
 1,390
 
 1,635
 (441) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Mcminnville TN 
 255
 1,443
 
 1,698
 (458) 7/31/2013  2010
Wendy's Murfreesboro TN 
 586
 1,088
 
 1,674
 (345) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's Nashville TN 
 592
 1,100
 
 1,692
 (349) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's Nashville TN 
 328
 1,313
 
 1,641
 (417) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's Corpus Christi TX 
 646
 1,198
 1
 1,845
 (381) 7/31/2013  1987
Wendy's El Paso TX 
 630
 1,889
 
 2,519
 (599) 7/31/2013  1996
Wendy's Christiansburg VA 
 416
 624
 
 1,040
 (198) 7/31/2013  1980
Wendy's Hillsville VA 
 324
 973
 
 1,297
 (309) 7/31/2013  2001
Wendy's Lebanon VA 
 431
 1,006
 
 1,437
 (319) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's Wytheville VA 
 598
 897
 
 1,495
 (285) 7/31/2013  2003
Wendy's Beloit WI 
 1,138
 931
 
 2,069
 (295) 7/31/2013  2002
Wendy's Fitchburg WI 
 662
 1,230
 
 1,892
 (390) 7/31/2013  2003
Wendy's Germantown WI 
 419
 1,257
 
 1,676
 (399) 7/31/2013  1989
Wendy's Greenfield WI 
 487
 1,137
 
 1,624
 (361) 7/31/2013  2001
Wendy's Janesville WI 
 647
 971
 
 1,618
 (308) 7/31/2013  1991
Wendy's Kenosha WI 
 322
 1,290
 
 1,612
 (409) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Kenosha WI 
 965
 1,447
 
 2,412
 (459) 7/31/2013  1986
Wendy's Madison WI 
 454
 1,362
 
 1,816
 (432) 7/31/2013  1998
Wendy's Milwaukee WI 
 810
 810
 
 1,620
 (257) 7/31/2013  1979
Wendy's Milwaukee WI 
 338
 1,351
 
 1,689
 (429) 7/31/2013  1985
Wendy's Milwaukee WI 
 436
 1,015
 1
 1,452
 (323) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's New Berlin WI 
 903
 739
 
 1,642
 (234) 7/31/2013  1983
Wendy's Oak Creek WI 
 577
 1,347
 
 1,924
 (428) 7/31/2013  1999
Wendy's Sheboygan WI 
 676
 1,014
 
 1,690
 (322) 7/31/2013  1995
Wendy's West Allis WI 
 583
 1,083
 
 1,666
 (344) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Bridgeport WV 
 273
 818
 
 1,091
 (260) 7/31/2013  1984
Wendy's Buckhannon WV 
 157
 890
 
 1,047
 (283) 7/31/2013  1987
Wendy's Parkersburg WV 
 295
 885
 
 1,180
 (281) 7/31/2013  1979
Wendy's Parkersburg WV 
 311
 1,243
 
 1,554
 (395) 7/31/2013  1977

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Parkersburg WV 
 241
 964
 
 1,205
 (306) 7/31/2013  1996
Wendy's Saint Marys WV 
 70
 1,322
 
 1,392
 (419) 7/31/2013  2001
Wendy's Vienna WV 
 301
 702
 
 1,003
 (223) 7/31/2013  1976
Whataburger Edna TX 
 290
 869
 
 1,159
 (276) 7/31/2013  1986
Whataburger Lubbock TX 
 432
 647
 
 1,079
 (205) 7/31/2013  1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken Warren OH 
 426
 640
 (421) 645
 (66) 7/31/2013  1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken New Kensington PA 
 324
 487
 (260) 551
 (57) 7/31/2013  1967
China Wok Springfield MO 
 753
 753
 (973) 533
 (11) 7/31/2013  2006
Torchy's Tacos Waco TX 
 595
 893
 
 1,488
 (283) 7/31/2013  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Plano TX 
 468
 869
 
 1,337
 (278) 8/1/2013  2013
DaVita Dialysis St. Pauls NC 
 138
 1,246
 
 1,384
 (343) 8/2/2013  2006
Dollar General Thibodaux LA 
 234
 1,146
 
 1,380
 (253) 2/7/2014 2012 Elkview WV 
 274
 823
 
 1,097
 (263) 8/2/2013  2013
Dollar General West Monroe LA 
 153
 869
 
 1,022
 (263) 3/9/2012 1995 Doolittle MO 
 137
 778
 
 915
 (249) 8/2/2013  2013
Dollar General Zachary LA 
 248
 743
 
 991
 (224) 4/26/2012 2011 Malden MO 
 108
 974
 
 1,082
 (311) 8/2/2013  2013
Dollar General Adams MA 
 254
 1,016
 
 1,270
 (240) 10/10/2013 2012 Amarillo TX 
 153
 866
 
 1,019
 (277) 8/2/2013  2013
Dollar General Bangor MI 
 173
 691
 
 864
 (203) 7/10/2012 2012 Mercedes TX 
 215
 859
 
 1,074
 (275) 8/2/2013  2013
Dollar General Bronson MI 
 97
 436
 
 533
 (163) 8/6/2014 1965 Annandale MN 
 212
 848
 
 1,060
 (271) 8/2/2013  2013
Walgreens Baltimore MD 
 1,185
 2,764
 
 3,949
 (943) 8/6/2013  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Etoile TX 
 45
 850
 
 895
 (272) 8/6/2013  2013
Dollar General Cadillac MI 
 187
 747
 
 934
 (226) 3/16/2012 2012 Avinger TX 
 44
 830
 
 874
 (265) 8/8/2013  2013
Dollar General Camden MI 
 138
 781
 
 919
 (214) 2/27/2013 2013 Amarillo TX 
 97
 877
 
 974
 (280) 8/13/2013  2013
Dollar General Carleton MI 
 222
 666
 
 888
 (202) 3/16/2012 2011 Boling TX 
 92
 831
 
 923
 (266) 8/13/2013  2013
Dollar General Covert MI 
 37
 704
 
 741
 (205) 8/30/2012 2012 Ganado TX 
 95
 857
 
 952
 (274) 8/13/2013  2013
Dollar General Durand MI 
 181
 726
 
 907
 (217) 5/18/2012 2012 San Antonio TX 
 333
 776
 
 1,109
 (248) 8/13/2013  2013
Dollar General East Jordan MI 
 125
 709
 
 834
 (208) 7/10/2012 2012 South Pekin IL 
 104
 933
 
 1,037
 (298) 8/14/2013  2013
FedEx Tinicum PA 
 
 32,180
 549
 32,729
 (11,607) 8/15/2013  2013
Dollar General Brookeland TX 
 93
 840
 
 933
 (269) 8/15/2013  2013
Mattress Firm Rock Hill SC 
 385
 898
 
 1,283
 (287) 8/21/2013  2008
Dollar General Flint MI 
 83
 743
 
 826
 (222) 5/18/2012 2012 Rolla MO 
 209
 835
 
 1,044
 (267) 8/21/2013  2013
Dollar General Flint MI 
 91
 820
 
 911
 (235) 10/31/2012 2012 Mahomet IL 
 292
 877
 
 1,169
 (280) 8/22/2013  2013
Dollar General Gaylord MI 
 172
 687
 
 859
 (202) 7/10/2012 2012 Pequot Lakes MN 
 155
 880
 
 1,035
 (281) 8/22/2013  2013
Dollar General Iron River MI 
 86
 777
 
 863
 (226) 8/30/2012 2012 Savannah MO 
 270
 811
 
 1,081
 (259) 8/23/2013  2013
Dollar General Manchester MI 
 213
 853
 
 1,066
 (234) 2/27/2013 2013 San Benito TX 
 202
 807
 
 1,009
 (258) 8/23/2013  2013
Dollar General Manistique MI 
 155
 876
 
 1,031
 (240) 2/27/2013 2012
Dollar General Melvindale MI 
 242
 967
 
 1,209
 (286) 6/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Mount Morris MI 
 110
 988
 
 1,098
 (271) 2/27/2013 2012
Dollar General Negaunee MI 
 87
 779
 
 866
 (227) 8/30/2012 2012
Dollar General Rapid City MI 
 179
 716
 
 895
 (196) 2/27/2013 2012
Dollar General Romulus MI 
 199
 794
 
 993
 (217) 2/27/2013 2011
Dollar General Roscommon MI 
 87
 781
 
 868
 (228) 8/30/2012 2012
Dollar General Wakefield MI 
 88
 794
 
 882
 (224) 12/19/2012 2012
Dollar General Albert Lea MN 
 223
 551
 (46) 728
 (89) 5/30/2014 1960
Dollar General Annandale MN 
 212
 848
 
 1,060
 (208) 8/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Barnesville MN 
 86
 841
 
 927
 (184) 2/26/2014 2014
Dollar General Cohasset MN 
 87
 964
 
 1,051
 (196) 5/2/2014 2013
Dollar General Ely MN 
 174
 944
 
 1,118
 (101) 4/30/2014 2014
Dollar General Hawley MN 
 89
 803
 
 892
 (190) 10/16/2013 2013
Dollar General Melrose MN 
 96
 863
 
 959
 (243) 12/17/2012 2012

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Advance Auto Parts Fort Atkinson WI 
 353
 824
 
 1,177
 (263) 8/26/2013  2004
FedEx Lebanon OH 
 1,492
 8,452
 
 9,944
 (3,190) 8/26/2013  2013
Dollar General Diana TX 
 186
 743
 
 929
 (238) 8/27/2013  2013
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 199
 796
 
 995
 (254) 8/28/2013  2013
Dollar General Cedar Falls IA 
 96
 862
 
 958
 (275) 8/28/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Marble Hill MO 
 38
 719
 
 757
 (230) 8/29/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Des Moines IA 
 152
 863
 5
 1,020
 (277) 8/30/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Thorp WI 
 90
 810
 
 900
 (259) 8/30/2013  2013
Applebee's Oxford AL 
 1,162
 2,157
 
 3,319
 (711) 8/30/2013  1995
Applebee's Pueblo CO 
 752
 2,257
 
 3,009
 (769) 8/30/2013  1998
Applebee's Thornton CO 
 681
 2,043
 
 2,724
 (696) 8/30/2013  1994
Applebee's Garden City ID 
 628
 2,512
 
 3,140
 (856) 8/30/2013  2003
Applebee's Roseburg OR 
 717
 1,673
 
 2,390
 (570) 8/30/2013  2000
Applebee's Vancouver WA 
 791
 1,846
 1
 2,638
 (629) 8/30/2013  2001
Bandana's Bar-B-Q Restaurant Fenton MO 
 470
 314
 
 784
 (107) 8/30/2013  1986
Johnny Carinos Columbus IN 
 809
 1,888
 
 2,697
 (643) 8/30/2013  2004
Johnny Carinos Muncie IN 
 540
 2,160
 
 2,700
 (736) 8/30/2013  2003
Applebee's Gresham OR 
 853
 2,560
 
 3,413
 (872) 8/30/2013  2004
Applebee's Alamogordo NM 
 271
 2,438
 
 2,709
 (831) 8/30/2013  2000
Dollar General Milaca MN 
 102
 916
 
 1,018
 (221) 9/24/2013 2013 Sand Springs OK 
 143
 811
 
 954
 (257) 9/3/2013  2013
Dollar General Montgomery MN 
 87
 783
 
 870
 (221) 12/17/2012 2012 Sand Springs OK 
 43
 819
 
 862
 (260) 9/3/2013  2013
Dollar General Olivia MN 
 98
 884
 
 982
 (246) 1/31/2013 2012 Sand Springs OK 
 198
 791
 
 989
 (251) 9/3/2013  2012
Dollar General Pequot Lakes MN 
 155
 880
 
 1,035
 (216) 8/22/2013 2013 Staples MN 
 150
 848
 
 998
 (269) 9/4/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Greensburg KS 
 80
 718
 
 798
 (228) 9/9/2013  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Centerville TX 
 226
 679
 
 905
 (215) 9/10/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lumberton NC 
 151
 603
 
 754
 (191) 9/11/2013  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jackson MI 
 93
 525
 
 618
 (167) 9/12/2013  2007
Dollar General Richmond MN 
 96
 836
 
 932
 (182) 2/20/2014 2014 Lexington MO 
 149
 846
 
 995
 (268) 9/13/2013  2013
Dollar General Roseau MN 
 143
 808
 
 951
 (191) 10/30/2013 2013
Dollar General Rush City MN 
 126
 716
 
 842
 (210) 7/25/2012 2012
Dollar General Springfield MN 
 88
 795
 
 883
 (224) 12/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Staples MN 
 150
 848
 
 998
 (205) 9/4/2013 2013
Dollar General Virginia MN 
 147
 831
 
 978
 (232) 1/14/2013 2012
Dollar General Appleton City MO 
 22
 124
 
 146
 (39) 11/10/2011 2004
Dollar General Ash Grove MO 
 35
 315
 
 350
 (98) 11/10/2011 2006
Dollar General Ashland MO 
 70
 398
 37
 505
 (123) 11/10/2011 2006
Dollar General Aurora MO 
 98
 881
 
 979
 (241) 2/28/2013 2013
Dollar General Auxvasse MO 300
 72
 650
 
 722
 (203) 11/22/2011 2011
Dollar General Belton MO 
 105
 948
 
 1,053
 (276) 8/3/2012 2012
Dollar General Berkeley MO 
 132
 748
 
 880
 (215) 10/9/2012 2012
Dollar General Bernie MO 
 35
 314
 
 349
 (98) 11/10/2011 2007
Dollar General Billings MO 
 139
 790
 
 929
 (187) 10/17/2013 2013
Dollar General Bloomfield MO 
 23
 215
 
 238
 (66) 11/10/2011 2005
Dollar General Cardwell MO 
 89
 805
 
 894
 (235) 8/24/2012 2012
Dollar General Carterville MO 
 10
 192
 
 202
 (60) 11/10/2011 2004
Dollar General Caruthersville MO 
 98
 878
 
 976
 (254) 9/27/2012 2012
Dollar General Caulfield MO 
 139
 789
 
 928
 (223) 12/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Clarkton MO 
 19
 354
 
 373
 (111) 11/10/2011 2007
Dollar General Clever MO 
 136
 542
 
 678
 (161) 6/19/2012 2010
Dollar General Conway MO 300
 37
 694
 
 731
 (217) 11/22/2011 2011
Dollar General De Soto MO 
 101
 912
 
 1,013
 (250) 2/14/2013 2013
Dollar General Diamond MO 
 44
 175
 
 219
 (55) 11/10/2011 2005
Dollar General Doolittle MO 
 137
 778
 
 915
 (191) 8/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Eagle Rock MO 
 133
 786
 
 919
 (172) 2/26/2014 2014
Dollar General Edina MO 
 127
 722
 
 849
 (209) 9/13/2012 2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Carlin NV 
 99
 895
 
 994
 (284) 9/13/2013  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cold Springs NV 
 217
 869
 
 1,086
 (276) 9/13/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mountain View WY 
 44
 838
 
 882
 (266) 9/13/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Clarendon TX 
 83
 749
 
 832
 (238) 9/17/2013  2013
24 Hour Fitness Woodlands TX 
 2,690
 7,463
 215
 10,368
 (2,861) 9/24/2013  2002

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Citizens Bank Warwick RI 
 1,870
 8,828
 697
 11,395
 (2,842) 9/24/2013  1995
The UPS Store Elizabethtown KY 
 1,460
 10,336
 777
 12,573
 (3,648) 9/24/2013  2001
Dollar General Eldon MO 
 52
 986
 
 1,038
 (270) 2/14/2013 2013 Milaca MN 
 102
 916
 
 1,018
 (290) 9/24/2013  2013
Dollar General Ellsinore MO 
 30
 579
 
 609
 (181) 11/10/2011 2010 Chelyan WV 
 273
 1,092
 
 1,365
 (346) 9/27/2013  2013
Dollar General Gower MO 
 118
 668
 
 786
 (195) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Hallsville MO 
 29
 263
 (6) 286
 (81) 11/10/2011 2004
Dollar General Hawk Point MO 
 177
 709
 
 886
 (206) 8/24/2012 2012
Dollar General Humansville MO 
 69
 277
 
 346
 (82) 6/19/2012 2007
Dollar General Jennings MO 
 445
 826
 
 1,271
 (243) 7/13/2012 2012
Dollar General Joplin MO 
 144
 816
 
 960
 (189) 11/12/2013 2013
Dollar General Kansas City MO 
 313
 731
 
 1,044
 (211) 9/21/2012 2012
Dollar General King City MO 300
 33
 625
 
 658
 (195) 11/22/2011 2010
Dollar General Laurie MO 
 102
 918
 
 1,020
 (213) 11/15/2013 2013
Dollar General Lawson MO 
 29
 162
 (3) 188
 (50) 11/10/2011 2003
Dollar General Lebanon MO 
 177
 708
 
 885
 (205) 9/24/2012 2012
Dollar General Lebanon MO 
 278
 835
 
 1,113
 (241) 9/21/2012 2012
Dollar General Lexington MO 
 149
 846
 
 995
 (204) 9/13/2013 2013
Dollar General Licking MO 300
 76
 688
 
 764
 (215) 11/22/2011 2010
Dollar General Lilbourn MO 
 62
 554
 
 616
 (173) 11/10/2011 2010
Dollar General Lonedell MO 
 208
 833
 
 1,041
 (220) 4/26/2013 2013
Dollar General Malden MO 
 108
 974
 
 1,082
 (239) 8/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Marble Hill MO 
 104
 935
 
 1,039
 (270) 9/11/2012 2012
Dollar General Marionville MO 
 89
 797
 
 886
 (228) 10/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Marthasville MO 300
 41
 782
 
 823
 (239) 2/1/2012 2011
Dollar General Maysville MO 300
 107
 607
 
 714
 (191) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Morehouse MO 
 87
 783
 
 870
 (226) 9/7/2012 2012
Dollar General New Haven MO 
 176
 702
 
 878
 (211) 4/27/2012 2012
Dollar General Oak Grove MO 
 27
 106
 64
 197
 (32) 6/19/2012 1999
Dollar General Oran MO 
 83
 747
 
 830
 (226) 3/30/2012 2012
Dollar General Osceola MO 
 93
 835
 
 928
 (229) 2/19/2013 2012
Dollar General Ozark MO 
 190
 758
 
 948
 (228) 4/27/2012 2012
Dollar General Ozark MO 
 149
 842
 
 991
 (243) 9/24/2012 2012
Dollar General Pacific MO 
 151
 853
 
 1,004
 (253) 6/6/2012 2012
Dollar General Palmyra MO 
 40
 225
 (3) 262
 (66) 6/19/2012 2003
Walgreens Orlando FL 
 1,007
 1,869
 
 2,876
 (633) 9/30/2013  1996
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Intrnatnl Falls MN 
 32
 608
 
 640
 (193) 9/30/2013  1966
First Bank Lake Mary FL 
 1,230
 1,504
 4
 2,738
 (454) 10/1/2013  1990
CVS Phoenix AZ 5,025
 1,511
 4,533
 4
 6,048
 (1,527) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Phoenix AZ 3,015
 901
 2,704
 15
 3,620
 (912) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Fresno CA 5,045
 1,890
 4,409
 16
 6,315
 (1,485) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Palmdale CA 5,226
 2,493
 4,630
 17
 7,140
 (1,560) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Sacramento CA 4,724
 2,163
 4,016
 19
 6,198
 (1,353) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Norwich CT 
 1,998
 5,995
 15
 8,008
 (2,018) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Lakeland FL 2,258
 587
 2,347
 16
 2,950
 (792) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Mandeville LA 4,020
 2,385
 2,915
 16
 5,316
 (983) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Metairie LA 4,121
 1,895
 3,519
 16
 5,430
 (1,186) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS New Orleans LA 3,719
 2,439
 2,439
 16
 4,894
 (823) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Slidell LA 4,355
 1,142
 4,568
 15
 5,725
 (1,538) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Hingham MA 5,695
 1,873
 5,619
 16
 7,508
 (1,892) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Malden MA 5,360
 1,757
 5,271
 14
 7,042
 (1,775) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS St. Joseph MO 3,015
 1,022
 3,067
 15
 4,104
 (1,034) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Beaufort NC 2,781
 378
 3,404
 15
 3,797
 (1,147) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Albuquerque NM 3,719
 975
 3,899
 17
 4,891
 (1,314) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Albuquerque NM 3,920
 1,029
 4,118
 17
 5,164
 (1,387) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Las Cruces NM 4,925
 1,295
 5,178
 17
 6,490
 (1,744) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Tulsa OK 2,446
 950
 2,216
 16
 3,182
 (748) 10/1/2013  2010
CVS Jackson TN 3,082
 1,209
 2,822
 15
 4,046
 (951) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Knoxville TN 2,613
 1,190
 2,210
 15
 3,415
 (745) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Converse TX 3,538
 1,390
 3,243
 16
 4,649
 (1,093) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Dumas TX 2,312
 846
 2,537
 15
 3,398
 (855) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Elsa TX 2,814
 915
 2,744
 15
 3,674
 (925) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Ft . Worth TX 4,147
 2,453
 3,679
 15
 6,147
 (1,239) 10/1/2013  2011



F-120


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS San Antonio TX 3,806
 1,996
 2,993
 16
 5,005
 (1,009) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS San Antonio TX 4,422
 2,034
 3,778
 15
 5,827
 (1,273) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS San Antonio TX 2,660
 868
 2,605
 16
 3,489
 (879) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS San Juan TX 2,345
 610
 2,441
 15
 3,066
 (823) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Norfolk VA 
 697
 2,789
 15
 3,501
 (940) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Portsmouth VA 
 1,230
 3,690
 16
 4,936
 (1,243) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Roanoke VA 
 825
 2,474
 14
 3,313
 (834) 10/1/2013  2011
CVS Virginia Beach VA 
 683
 3,868
 14
 4,565
 (1,303) 10/1/2013  2012
CVS Williamsburg VA 
 907
 5,137
 15
 6,059
 (1,730) 10/1/2013  2011
First Bank Pinellas Park FL 
 630
 1,470
 4
 2,104
 (443) 10/1/2013  1980
Huntington National Bank Jefferson OH 
 255
 765
 7
 1,027
 (231) 10/1/2013  1963
Huntington National Bank Conneaut OH 
 205
 477
 7
 689
 (145) 10/1/2013  1971
Morgan's Foods Pittsburgh PA 
 180
 269
 3
 452
 (84) 10/1/2013  1995
Morgan's Foods Benwood WV 
 123
 287
 4
 414
 (89) 10/1/2013  1995
Mattress Firm Daphne AL 
 528
 1,233
 
 1,761
 (388) 10/1/2013  2013
Bojangles Troutman NC 
 718
 1,077
 
 1,795
 (419) 10/10/2013  2012
Bojangles Fountain Inn SC 
 287
 1,150
 
 1,437
 (447) 10/10/2013  2012
Dollar General Adams MA 
 254
 1,016
 
 1,270
 (320) 10/10/2013  2012
Dollar General Modena NY 
 249
 996
 
 1,245
 (314) 10/10/2013  2012
Tractor Supply Mims FL 
 310
 2,787
 
 3,097
 (778) 10/10/2013  2012
Tractor Supply Plaistow NH 
 638
 2,552
 
 3,190
 (712) 10/10/2013  2012
FedEx London KY 
 350
 3,151
 
 3,501
 (1,102) 10/11/2013  2013
Dollar General Hawley MN 
 89
 803
 
 892
 (253) 10/16/2013  2013
Dollar General Weslaco TX 
 205
 822
 
 1,027
 (259) 10/16/2013  2013
Dollar General Billings MO 
 139
 790
 
 929
 (249) 10/17/2013  2013
Dollar General Texarkana TX 
 136
 772
 
 908
 (243) 10/25/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar University Park IL 
 295
 688
 
 983
 (217) 10/29/2013  2013
Dollar General Roseau MN 
 143
 808
 
 951
 (254) 10/30/2013  2013
Dollar General Lytle TX 
 243
 971
 
 1,214
 (306) 10/30/2013  2013
Dollar General New Braunfels TX 
 156
 883
 
 1,039
 (278) 10/30/2013  2013
Academy Sports + Outdoors Mobile AL 
 1,311
 7,431
 
 8,742
 (2,072) 11/1/2013  2012
Academy Sports + Outdoors Smyrna TN 
 2,109
 8,434
 
 10,543
 (2,351) 11/1/2013  2012
Abbott Laboratories Waukegan IL 
 4,734
 21,319
 1,960
 28,013
 (6,551) 11/5/2013  1980

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Aetna Life Insurance Fresno CA 
 3,405
 22,343
 2,937
 28,685
 (3,888) 11/5/2013  1969
amec Houston TX 
 2,524
 30,398
 1
 32,923
 (8,782) 11/5/2013  1998
AT&T Richardson TX 10,630
 1,891
 31,118
 728
 33,737
 (9,055) 11/5/2013  1986
Becton Dickinson San Antonio TX 8,894
 1,666
 19,092
 94
 20,852
 (5,365) 11/5/2013  2008
Bunge North America Fort Worth TX 
 1,100
 8,433
 
 9,533
 (2,610) 11/5/2013  2005
Cadbury Whippany NJ 
 2,767
 38,018
 (22,414) 18,371
 
 11/5/2013  2004
All About Cha Tulsa OK 
 1,253
 70,274
 1,868
 73,395
 (19,571) 11/5/2013  1995
Comcast Englewood CO 
 1,490
 5,060
 8
 6,558
 (1,553) 11/5/2013  1999
Cooper Tires Franklin IN 14,385
 4,438
 33,994
 
 38,432
 (11,784) 11/5/2013  2009
Crozer-Keystone HealthSystem Ridley Park PA 
 
 6,114
 (5,092) 1,022
 (20) 11/5/2013  1976
Bob's Stores Randolph MA 
 2,840
 6,826
 276
 9,942
 (2,280) 11/5/2013  1965
Peraton Herndon VA 
 1,384
 53,584
 (12,143) 42,825
 (2,634) 11/5/2013  1999
Farmers Insurance Mercer Island WA 
 24,285
 28,210
 
 52,495
 (7,934) 11/5/2013  1982
GM Financial Arlington TX 
 7,901
 35,553
 
 43,454
 (10,426) 11/5/2013  1998
General Service Administration Ponce PR 
 1,780
 9,313
 (5,494) 5,599
 (174) 11/5/2013  1995
MDC Holdings Inc. Denver CO 
 12,648
 66,398
 1,921
 80,967
 (18,820) 11/5/2013  2001
Giant Levittown PA 
 4,716
 9,955
 
 14,671
 (2,842) 11/5/2013  2006
Lowe's New Orleans LA 11,555
 10,315
 20,728
 
 31,043
 (5,918) 11/5/2013  2005
Metro by T-Mobile Richardson TX 7,316
 1,292
 19,606
 769
 21,667
 (5,703) 11/5/2013  1986
Michelin Louisville KY 
 1,120
 7,763
 
 8,883
 (2,691) 11/5/2013  2011
Pearson Lawrence KS 
 2,548
 18,057
 (3,435) 17,170
 (2,605) 11/5/2013  1997
BHC Marketing The Woodlands TX 
 4,724
 40,332
 28
 45,084
 (11,004) 11/5/2013  2009
Pulte Mortgage Englewood CO 
 2,563
 22,026
 475
 25,064
 (6,355) 11/5/2013  2009
Teva Pharmaceuticals Malvern PA 
 2,666
 40,981
 (6,124) 37,523
 (5,300) 11/5/2013  1999
Tiffany & Co. Parsippany��NJ 
 2,248
 81,081
 
 83,329
 (28,106) 11/5/2013  1997
Time Warner Cable Milwaukee WI 
 3,081
 22,512
 1,095
 26,688
 (6,661) 11/5/2013  2001
T-Mobile Nashville TN 
 1,190
 15,847
 1,428
 18,465
 (4,683) 11/5/2013  2002
Mars Petcare Columbia SC 
 1,875
 19,591
 (984) 20,482
 (4,391) 11/5/2013  2014
APG Polytech The Woodlands TX 14,391
 5,219
 19,196
 7,862
 32,277
 (4,214) 11/5/2013  2014
The Vitamin Shoppe Ashland VA 
 2,399
 19,663
 
 22,062
 (6,816) 11/5/2013  2013
Walgreens Portsmouth VA 
 730
 3,311
 
 4,041
 (1,105) 11/5/2013  1998
Dollar General Plattsburg MO 
 44
 843
 
 887
 (246) 8/9/2012 2012 Joplin MO 
 144
 816
 
 960
 (255) 11/12/2013  2013
Dollar General Qulin MO 
 30
 573
 (8) 595
 (178) 11/10/2011 2009 Laurie MO 
 102
 918
 
 1,020
 (287) 11/15/2013  2013
Dollar General Robertsville MO 
 131
 744
 
 875
 (217) 8/24/2012 2011
Dollar General Rocky Mount MO 
 88
 789
 
 877
 (230) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Rolla MO 
 209
 835
 
 1,044
 (205) 8/21/2013 2013
Dollar General Savannah MO 
 270
 811
 
 1,081
 (199) 8/23/2013 2013
Dollar General Sedadia MO 
 273
 637
 
 910
 (184) 9/7/2012 2012
Dollar General Senath MO 
 61
 552
 
 613
 (163) 6/19/2012 2010
Dollar General Seneca MO 
 47
 189
 180
 416
 (56) 6/19/2012 1962
Dollar General Shelbina MO 
 101
 911
 
 1,012
 (237) 5/22/2013 2013
Dollar General Sikeston MO 
 56
 1,056
 
 1,112
 (322) 2/24/2012 2011
Dollar General Sikeston MO 
 144
 819
 
 963
 (239) 8/24/2012 2012
Dollar General Springfield MO 
 378
 702
 
 1,080
 (208) 6/14/2012 2012
Dollar General St. Clair MO 400
 220
 879
 
 1,099
 (272) 12/30/2011 1995
Dollar General St. James MO 
 81
 244
 
 325
 (72) 6/19/2012 1999
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 372
 692
 
 1,064
 (202) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 260
 606
 
 866
 (175) 9/26/2012 2012
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 215
 1,219
 
 1,434
 (322) 4/30/2013 1995
Dollar General St. Louis MO 
 445
 1,039
 
 1,484
 (293) 12/14/2012 2012
Dollar General Stanberry MO 300
 111
 629
 
 740
 (197) 11/22/2011 2010
Dollar General Steele MO 
 31
 598
 
 629
 (187) 11/10/2011 2009
Dollar General Strafford MO 
 51
 471
 
 522
 (145) 11/10/2011 2009
Dollar General Vienna MO 
 78
 704
 
 782
 (215) 2/24/2012 2011
Dollar General West Plains MO 
 90
 769
 
 859
 (168) 2/20/2014 2014
Dollar General Willow Springs MO 
 24
 213
 (4) 233
 (63) 6/19/2012 2002
Dollar General Windsor MO 
 86
 829
 
 915
 (181) 2/20/2014 2014
Dollar General Edwards MS 300
 75
 671
 
 746
 (208) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Greenville MS 300
 82
 739
 
 821
 (229) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Hickory MS 
 77
 692
 
 769
 (203) 7/2/2012 2011
Dollar General Jackson MS 
 198
 793
 
 991
 (229) 9/27/2012 2011
Dollar General Meridian MS 
 178
 713
 
 891
 (206) 9/13/2012 2011
Dollar General Meridian MS 
 40
 754
 
 794
 (218) 9/13/2012 2011

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Moorhead MS 
 107
 606
 
 713
 (181) 5/1/2012 2011
Dollar General Natchez MS 
 166
 664
 
 830
 (197) 6/12/2012 2012

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General San Juan TX 
 169
 956
 
 1,125
 (299) 11/15/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Oakwood TX 
 133
 752
 
 885
 (235) 11/20/2013  2013
Dollar General Kyle TX 
 101
 910
 
 1,011
 (282) 12/6/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lombard IL 
 1,008
 543
 
 1,551
 (168) 12/12/2013  1967
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Markesan WI 
 92
 831
 
 923
 (258) 12/12/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cincinnatus NY 
 287
 862
 
 1,149
 (267) 12/30/2013  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Remus MI 
 49
 992
 
 1,041
 (322) 1/2/2014  2012
Bank of America Merced CA 
 512
 2,195
 383
 3,090
 (730) 1/8/2014  1980
Bank of America Asheville NC 
 383
 195
 
 578
 (63) 1/8/2014  1993
Bank of America Charlotte NC 
 62
 642
 
 704
 (204) 1/8/2014  1983
Vacant Grants Pass OR 
 393
 2,979
 (1,271) 2,101
 (15) 1/8/2014  1963
Old Country Buffet Burbank CA 
 246
 1,309
 (1,093) 462
 (137) 1/8/2014  2001
Home Town Buffet Rialto CA 
 265
 1,261
 (1,046) 480
 (213) 1/8/2014  1998
Vacant San Luis Obispo CA 
 195
 1,013
 (844) 364
 (294) 1/8/2014  2000
Home Town Buffet Santa Maria CA 
 191
 1,006
 (763) 434
 (117) 1/8/2014  2002
Vacant Lone Tree CO 
 196
 1,014
 (1,070) 140
 (45) 1/8/2014  1995
Home Town Buffet Newark DE 
 177
 1,129
 (739) 567
 (203) 1/8/2014  1983
United Buffet and Grille Hagerstown MD 
 244
 1,306
 (1,506) 44
 (25) 1/8/2014  2001
Fire Mountain Buffet Summerville SC 
 245
 1,308
 (1,241) 312
 (90) 1/8/2014  1997
Home Town Buffet Union Gap WA 
 253
 1,320
 (1,223) 350
 (136) 1/8/2014  2002
Fire Mountain Buffet Charleston WV 
 243
 1,305
 (1,228) 320
 (112) 1/8/2014  2000
Ryan's Buffet Clarksburg WV 
 
 1,639
 (1,306) 333
 (106) 1/8/2014  2001
General Electric Longmont CO 
 1,402
 15,640
 1,260
 18,302
 (5,687) 1/8/2014  1993
Goodyear Stockbridge GA 
 1,222
 32,119
 
 33,341
 (11,514) 1/8/2014  1995
Goodyear DeKalb IL 
 4,476
 44,516
 395
 49,387
 (15,948) 1/8/2014  1999
Goodyear Lockbourne OH 
 3,107
 28,868
 
 31,975
 (9,933) 1/8/2014  1998
Goodyear York PA 
 1,980
 53,396
 366
 55,742
 (18,132) 1/8/2014  2001
Goodyear Terrell TX 
 2,516
 34,804
 
 37,320
 (12,449) 1/8/2014  1998
Goodyear McDonough GA 
 1,797
 21,264
 
 23,061
 (7,402) 1/8/2014  1995
PNC Bank Woodbury NJ 
 465
 2,633
 
 3,098
 (831) 1/8/2014  1971
Walgreens Talladega AL 
 377
 1,311
 
 1,688
 (441) 1/8/2014  1997
Walgreens Tucker GA 
 793
 1,419
 
 2,212
 (474) 1/8/2014  1996
Walgreens Dover-foxcroft ME 
 256
 2,659
 22
 2,937
 (902) 1/8/2014  1999

  Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation 
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Fort Fairfield ME 
 117
 1,821
 76
 2,014
 (621) 1/8/2014  1998
Walgreens Fort Kent ME 
 387
 2,064
 
 2,451
 (691) 1/8/2014  1999
Dollar General Soso MS 
 116
 658
 
 774
 (198) 4/12/2012 2011 Van Buren ME 
 115
 1,720
 (1,009) 826
 (57) 1/8/2014  1998
Dollar General Stonewall MS 
 116
 655
 
 771
 (192) 7/2/2012 2011
Dollar General Stringer MS 
 116
 655
 
 771
 (193) 7/2/2012 2011
Dollar General Walnut Grove MS 300
 71
 641
 
 712
 (199) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Edenton NC 
 240
 1,025
 
 1,265
 (225) 2/28/2014 2013
Dollar General Fayetteville NC 300
 216
 647
 
 863
 (198) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Hendersonville NC 
 360
 1,034
 
 1,394
 (224) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Hickory NC 
 89
 804
 
 893
 (234) 8/13/2012 2012
Dollar General Morganton NC 
 472
 1,108
 
 1,580
 (243) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Ocean Isle Beach NC 400
 341
 633
 
 974
 (193) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Tryon NC 
 139
 789
 
 928
 (230) 8/13/2012 2012
Dollar General Vass NC 300
 226
 528
 
 754
 (161) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Farmington NM 
 269
 807
 
 1,076
 (233) 9/6/2012 2012
Dollar General Farmington NM 
 224
 898
 
 1,122
 (225) 7/11/2013 2013
Dollar General Modena NY 
 249
 996
 
 1,245
 (235) 10/10/2013 2012
Dollar General Fairfield OH 
 131
 1,272
 
 1,403
 (262) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Forest OH 300
 76
 681
 
 757
 (214) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Gratis OH 
 161
 1,042
 
 1,203
 (229) 2/18/2014 2013
Dollar General Greenfield OH 400
 110
 986
 
 1,096
 (301) 2/23/2012 2011
Dollar General Hicksville OH 
 156
 1,490
 
 1,646
 (309) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Loudonville OH 
 236
 945
 
 1,181
 (280) 6/6/2012 2012
Dollar General Lowell OH 
 157
 1,114
 
 1,271
 (232) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Lucasville OH 
 223
 893
 
 1,116
 (267) 5/16/2012 2012
Dollar General New Charlisle OH 
 215
 860
 
 1,075
 (253) 7/10/2012 2012
Dollar General New Matamoras OH 300
 123
 696
 
 819
 (219) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Payne OH 300
 81
 729
 
 810
 (230) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Pemberville OH 
 146
 1,059
 
 1,205
 (224) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Pleasant City OH 300
 131
 740
 
 871
 (233) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Powhatan Point OH 
 138
 784
 
 922
 (196) 7/2/2013 2014
Dollar General Sandusky OH 
 210
 1,700
 
 1,910
 (353) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Toledo OH 
 252
 1,149
 
 1,401
 (241) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Wheelersburg OH 
 395
 1,132
 
 1,527
 (247) 2/25/2014 1925
Walgreens Burlington NC 
 973
 2,726
 (2,123) 1,576
 (35) 1/8/2014  2000
Rite Aid Bristol NH 
 395
 1,461
 53
 1,909
 (498) 1/8/2014  1997
Rite Aid Winchester NH 
 343
 1,868
 
 2,211
 (632) 1/8/2014  1998
Rite Aid Meadville PA 
 193
 2,521
 
 2,714
 (836) 1/8/2014  1999
Popeyes Carol City FL 
 423
 1,090
 
 1,513
 (341) 1/8/2014  1979
Popeyes Pensacola FL 
 301
 673
 
 974
 (211) 1/8/2014  2001
Popeyes Tampa FL 
 216
 508
 
 724
 (160) 1/8/2014  1981
Popeyes Grenada MS 
 77
 458
 
 535
 (144) 1/8/2014  2007
Sovereign Bank Linden NJ 
 601
 2,329
 
 2,930
 (721) 1/8/2014  1945
Sovereign Bank Kennett Square PA 
 837
 2,412
 
 3,249
 (741) 1/8/2014  1963
State of Colorado Longmont CO 
 1,150
 9,067
 6,023
 16,240
 (4,235) 1/8/2014  1988
US Bank Garfield Height OH 
 165
 1,016
 
 1,181
 (332) 1/8/2014  1958
Vacant Bristol PA 
 114
 81
 118
 313
 (40) 1/8/2014  1818
United Way Lebanon PA 
 80
 435
 89
 604
 (146) 1/8/2014  1995
Walgreens Tulsa OK 
 1,147
 2,904
 
 4,051
 (869) 2/7/2014  2001
Sam's Club Hoover AL 
 2,253
 9,606
 
 11,859
 (2,573) 2/7/2014  1989
Home Depot Las Vegas NV 
 7,907
 
 
 7,907
 
 2/7/2014  1998
Home Depot Odessa TX 
 1,599
 
 
 1,599
 
 2/7/2014  1998
Home Depot San Diego CA 
 12,518
 
 
 12,518
 
 2/7/2014  1998
Lowe's Las Vegas NV 
 11,499
 
 
 11,499
 
 2/7/2014  2002
Wal-Mart Albuquerque NM 
 10,991
 
 
 10,991
 
 2/7/2014  2008
Wal-Mart Las Vegas NV 
 17,038
 
 
 17,038
 
 2/7/2014  2001
Academy Sports + Outdoors Bossier City LA 
 2,906
 6,555
 
 9,461
 (1,904) 2/7/2014  2008
Academy Sports + Outdoors Laredo TX 
 2,782
 8,111
 
 10,893
 (2,110) 2/7/2014  2008
LA Fitness Carmel IN 
 1,457
 9,562
 
 11,019
 (2,788) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Oxford AL 
 278
 748
 
 1,026
 (211) 2/7/2014  1989
Aaron's Indianapolis IN 
 235
 1,071
 
 1,306
 (299) 2/7/2014  1998
Aaron's Minden LA 
 323
 1,043
 
 1,366
 (351) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Shawnee OK 
 303
 1,135
 
 1,438
 (343) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Meadville PA 
 237
 1,224
 
 1,461
 (362) 2/7/2014  1994

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Broken Bow OK 
 331
 1,325
 
 1,656
 (242) 5/19/2014 2012
Dollar General Calera OK 
 136
 770
 
 906
 (224) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Commerce OK 
 38
 341
 (6) 373
 (106) 11/10/2011 2006
Dollar General Hartshorne OK 
 100
 898
 
 998
 (262) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Lexington OK 
 85
 761
 
 846
 (222) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Maud OK 
 76
 688
 
 764
 (200) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Maysville OK 
 41
 785
 
 826
 (229) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Ponca City OK 
 145
 1,161
 
 1,306
 (240) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Rush Spring OK 
 87
 779
 
 866
 (227) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Sand Springs OK 
 143
 811
 
 954
 (196) 9/3/2013 2013
Dollar General Sand Springs OK 
 43
 819
 
 862
 (197) 9/3/2013 2013
Dollar General Sand Springs OK 
 198
 791
 
 989
 (191) 9/3/2013 2012
Dollar General Tahlequah OK 
 123
 1,101
 
 1,224
 (227) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Wagoner OK 
 31
 1,076
 
 1,107
 (223) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Pleasantville PA 
 163
 941
 
 1,104
 (201) 3/24/2014 2013
Dollar General Sykesville PA 
 68
 1,075
 
 1,143
 (229) 3/24/2014 2013
Dollar General Wattsburg PA 
 96
 1,031
 
 1,127
 (220) 3/24/2014 2014
Dollar General Holly Hill SC 1,983
 259
 2,333
 
 2,592
 (628) 3/6/2013 2013
Dollar General West Union SC 
 46
 868
 
 914
 (217) 7/3/2013 2011
Dollar General Doyle TN 
 75
 679
 
 754
 (198) 8/22/2012 2012
Dollar General Manchester TN 
 114
 646
 
 760
 (190) 7/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Mcminnville TN 
 120
 679
 
 799
 (199) 7/12/2012 2012
Dollar General Pleasant Hill TN 300
 39
 747
 
 786
 (232) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Adkins TX 
 157
 889
 
 1,046
 (251) 12/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Amarillo TX 
 97
 877
 
 974
 (215) 8/13/2013 2013
Dollar General Amarillo TX 
 153
 866
 
 1,019
 (213) 8/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Amarillo TX 
 198
 794
 
 992
 (199) 7/11/2013 2013
Dollar General Avinger TX 
 44
 830
 
 874
 (204) 8/8/2013 2013
Dollar General Beeville TX 
 90
 810
 
 900
 (230) 11/19/2012 2012
Dollar General Belton TX 
 89
 804
 
 893
 (220) 2/28/2013 2013
Dollar General Belton TX 
 145
 821
 
 966
 (237) 9/13/2012 2012
Dollar General Blessing TX 
 83
 745
 
 828
 (210) 12/18/2012 2012

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Aaron's Humble TX 
 548
 1,146
 
 1,694
 (334) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Mexia TX 
 126
 1,186
 
 1,312
 (341) 2/7/2014  2007
Aaron's Odessa TX 
 99
 768
 
 867
 (227) 2/7/2014  2006
Gildan North Charleston SC 
 2,193
 4,636
 
 6,829
 (1,422) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Statesboro GA 
 351
 1,163
 
 1,514
 (340) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Mansura LA 
 81
 497
 
 578
 (160) 2/7/2014  2000
Aaron's Battle Creek MI 
 286
 843
 
 1,129
 (244) 2/7/2014  1995
Aaron's Columbia SC 
 576
 1,010
 (41) 1,545
 (289) 2/7/2014  1977
Aaron's Chattanooga TN 
 480
 1,075
 
 1,555
 (283) 2/7/2014  1989
Aaron's Killeen TX 
 815
 3,244
 
 4,059
 (925) 2/7/2014  1981
Aaron's Livingston TX 
 173
 1,498
 
 1,671
 (427) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Pasadena TX 
 444
 1,231
 
 1,675
 (358) 2/7/2014  2009
Aaron's El Dorado AR 
 238
 743
 
 981
 (232) 2/7/2014  2000
Aaron's Pensacola FL 
 159
 924
 
 1,083
 (263) 2/7/2014  1979
Aaron's Benton Harbor MI 
 217
 924
 
 1,141
 (270) 2/7/2014  1997
Aaron's Copperas Cove TX 
 423
 1,341
 
 1,764
 (383) 2/7/2014  2007
Aaron's Haltom City TX 
 858
 1,024
 
 1,882
 (320) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Port Lavaca TX 
 160
 1,274
 
 1,434
 (368) 2/7/2014  2007
Aaron's Texas City TX 
 275
 2,156
 
 2,431
 (613) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Richmond VA 
 508
 1,435
 
 1,943
 (465) 2/7/2014  1988
Academy Sports + Outdoors Montgomery AL 
 1,869
 6,385
 
 8,254
 (1,984) 2/7/2014  2009
Academy Sports + Outdoors Fort Worth TX 
 2,072
 8,329
 
 10,401
 (2,105) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Edmond OK 
 697
 4,287
 1
 4,985
 (1,287) 2/7/2014  2000
Walgreens Stillwater OK 
 368
 4,368
 87
 4,823
 (1,315) 2/7/2014  2000
Cracker Barrel Columbus GA 
 912
 3,153
 
 4,065
 (983) 2/7/2014  2003
Cracker Barrel Greensboro NC 
 1,632
 2,495
 
 4,127
 (808) 2/7/2014  2005
Cracker Barrel Rocky Mount NC 
 1,274
 2,334
 
 3,608
 (776) 2/7/2014  2006
Cracker Barrel Fort Mill SC 
 1,301
 2,721
 
 4,022
 (890) 2/7/2014  2006
Cracker Barrel Piedmont SC 
 1,630
 2,927
 
 4,557
 (954) 2/7/2014  2005
Cracker Barrel Abilene TX 
 1,374
 2,933
 
 4,307
 (956) 2/7/2014  2005
Cracker Barrel San Antonio TX 
 1,725
 3,005
 
 4,730
 (922) 2/7/2014  2005
Cracker Barrel Sherman TX 
 557
 3,744
 
 4,301
 (1,168) 2/7/2014  2007
Cracker Barrel Bristol VA 
 1,241
 1,703
 
 2,944
 (671) 2/7/2014  2006

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Boling TX 
 92
 831
 
 923
 (204) 8/13/2013 2013
Dollar General Brookeland TX 
 93
 840
 
 933
 (207) 8/15/2013 2013
Dollar General Bryan TX 
 148
 840
 
 988
 (243) 9/14/2012 2012
Dollar General Bryan TX 
 193
 772
 
 965
 (223) 9/14/2012 2012
Dollar General Bryan TX 
 185
 740
 
 925
 (216) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Buchanan Dam TX 
 145
 820
 
 965
 (237) 9/28/2012 2012
Dollar General Canyon Lake TX 
 149
 843
 
 992
 (242) 10/12/2012 2012
Dollar General Cedar Creek TX 
 291
 680
 
 971
 (193) 11/16/2012 2012
Dollar General Como TX 
 76
 683
 
 759
 (205) 4/20/2012 2012
Dollar General Corpus Christi TX 
 270
 809
 
 1,079
 (228) 12/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Diana TX 
 186
 743
 
 929
 (183) 8/27/2013 2013
Dollar General Donna TX 
 136
 768
 
 904
 (222) 9/11/2012 2012
Dollar General Donna TX 
 200
 799
 
 999
 (229) 10/12/2012 2012
Dollar General Donna TX 
 145
 820
 
 965
 (228) 1/31/2013 2012
Dollar General Edinburg TX 
 136
 769
 
 905
 (222) 9/7/2012 2012
Dollar General Edinburg TX 
 102
 914
 
 1,016
 (229) 7/16/2013 2013
Dollar General Elmendorf TX 
 94
 847
 
 941
 (243) 10/23/2012 2012
Dollar General Ganado TX 
 95
 857
 
 952
 (211) 8/13/2013 2013
Dollar General Gladewater TX 
 184
 736
 
 920
 (214) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General Gordonville TX 
 38
 717
 
 755
 (216) 4/20/2012 2012
Dollar General Kyle TX 
 132
 747
 
 879
 (216) 9/26/2012 2012
Dollar General Kyle TX 
 101
 910
 
 1,011
 (207) 12/6/2013 2013
Dollar General La Marque TX 
 102
 917
 
 1,019
 (267) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Lacy Lakeview TX 
 146
 826
 
 972
 (235) 11/16/2012 2012
Dollar General Laredo TX 
 253
 758
 
 1,011
 (223) 7/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Littleriver Acdmy TX 
 122
 693
 
 815
 (209) 4/27/2012 2012
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 267
 801
 
 1,068
 (233) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 199
 796
 
 995
 (196) 8/28/2013 2013
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 148
 841
 
 989
 (219) 5/16/2013 2013
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 41
 825
 
 866
 (180) 2/20/2014 2014
Dollar General Lyford TX 300
 80
 724
 
 804
 (225) 12/30/2011 2010
Dollar General Lytle TX 
 243
 971
 
 1,214
 (230) 10/30/2013 2013
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Cracker Barrel Waynesboro VA 
 1,536
 1,489
 
 3,025
 (703) 2/7/2014  2004
Kohl's Tavares FL 
 4,173
 
 
 4,173
 
 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Roswell NM 
 947
 2,181
 
 3,128
 (544) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Edinburg TX 
 768
 3,163
 
 3,931
 (735) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Del Rio TX 
 927
 2,044
 
 2,971
 (493) 2/7/2014  2009
Harris Teeter Durham NC 
 3,239
 
 
 3,239
 
 2/7/2014  2009
Kohl's Monrovia CA 
 8,052
 7,891
 
 15,943
 (2,175) 2/7/2014  1982
CVS Edinburg TX 
 1,179
 3,060
 
 4,239
 (958) 2/7/2014  2008
Best Buy Bourbonnais IL 
 1,724
 5,156
 
 6,880
 (1,747) 2/7/2014  1991
LA Fitness Glendale AZ 3,001
 2,177
 7,568
 20
 9,765
 (2,417) 2/7/2014  2005
Best Buy Coral Springs FL 
 2,715
 4,843
 
 7,558
 (1,633) 2/7/2014  1993
CVS Sparks NV 
 486
 5,894
 
 6,380
 (1,786) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Spearfish SD 
 1,116
 4,158
 
 5,274
 (1,252) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply St. John IN 
 1,715
 3,397
 
 5,112
 (868) 2/7/2014  2007
Tractor Supply Irmo SC 
 725
 2,171
 62
 2,958
 (551) 2/7/2014  2009
Home Depot Tucson AZ 
 6,251
 
 
 6,251
 
 2/7/2014  2005
Advance Auto Parts Webster TX 
 385
 1,452
 
 1,837
 (387) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 285
 1,405
 (8) 1,682
 (376) 2/7/2014  2006
Advance Auto Parts Humble TX 
 420
 1,404
 
 1,824
 (376) 2/7/2014  2007
Publix Birmingham AL 
 934
 6,377
 165
 7,476
 (1,877) 2/7/2014  2004
Advance Auto Parts Deer Park TX 
 295
 1,507
 
 1,802
 (401) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 225
 1,293
 
 1,518
 (346) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Houston TX 
 189
 1,666
 
 1,855
 (442) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Kingwood TX 
 419
 1,392
 
 1,811
 (373) 2/7/2014  2009
Lowe's Kansas CIty MO 
 3,729
 
 
 3,729
 
 2/7/2014  2009
LA Fitness Spring TX 
 1,970
 9,290
 
 11,260
 (2,652) 2/7/2014  2006
Kohl's Columbia SC 
 1,532
 14,561
 
 16,093
 (3,432) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Lubbock TX 
 265
 1,259
 
 1,524
 (341) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Huntsville TX 
 327
 1,278
 
 1,605
 (342) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Twin Falls ID 2,286
 1,156
 3,896
 
 5,052
 (1,201) 2/7/2014  2009




F-126


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
CVS Meridianville AL 1,870
 1,045
 3,057
 
 4,102
 (988) 2/7/2014  2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts New Roads LA 
 175
 737
 
 912
 (221) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Sicklerville NJ 
 1,931
 4,302
 
 6,233
 (1,027) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens South Bend IN 2,932
 1,240
 5,014
 1
 6,255
 (1,530) 2/7/2014  2006
Kum & Go Tipton IA 
 507
 1,945
 
 2,452
 (702) 2/7/2014  2008
Kum & Go Story City IA 
 223
 2,089
 
 2,312
 (632) 2/7/2014  2006
Walgreens St. Charles IL 1,905
 1,472
 3,262
 
 4,734
 (957) 2/7/2014  2002
Walgreens South Elgin IL 2,124
 1,710
 3,208
 
 4,918
 (980) 2/7/2014  2002
FedEx Effingham IL 6,607
 1,875
 14,827
 34
 16,736
 (3,896) 2/7/2014  2008
LA Fitness Highland CA 4,411
 2,274
 8,673
 
 10,947
 (2,772) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Framingham MA 2,863
 2,103
 4,770
 
 6,873
 (1,393) 2/7/2014  2007
Walgreens Appleton WI 1,764
 975
 3,047
 
 4,022
 (919) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Appleton WI 2,572
 1,198
 4,344
 
 5,542
 (1,315) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Durham NC 2,871
 1,441
 3,581
 
 5,022
 (1,178) 2/7/2014  2010
Walgreens Fort Mill SC 
 1,300
 2,760
 (233) 3,827
 (917) 2/7/2014  2010
Walgreens Winterville NC 2,844
 578
 5,322
 
 5,900
 (1,664) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Lancaster SC 2,797
 1,941
 3,526
 
 5,467
 (1,183) 2/7/2014  2009
Kum & Go West Branch IA 
 219
 1,089
 
 1,308
 (329) 2/7/2014  1997
Walgreens Cleveland OH 2,530
 743
 4,757
 
 5,500
 (1,457) 2/7/2014  2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts Breaux Bridge LA 
 139
 738
 
 877
 (220) 2/7/2014  2009
Cigna Plano TX 
 10,036
 42,676
 
 52,712
 (11,617) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Baytown TX 2,327
 953
 4,298
 1
 5,252
 (1,263) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Omaha NE 2,421
 1,316
 4,122
 
 5,438
 (1,252) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens North Platte NE 
 935
 4,291
 1
 5,227
 (1,317) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Kingman AZ 2,817
 669
 5,726
 
 6,395
 (1,699) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Augusta ME 2,967
 1,648
 5,146
 
 6,794
 (1,589) 2/7/2014  2007
Cargill Blair NE 2,364
 627
 4,989
 
 5,616
 (1,232) 2/7/2014  2009
LA Fitness Denton TX 3,716
 1,888
 9,568
 (6) 11,450
 (2,740) 2/7/2014  2009
O'Reilly Auto Parts La Place LA 
 342
 819
 
 1,161
 (241) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens North Mankato MN 2,378
 1,748
 3,604
 
 5,352
 (1,095) 2/7/2014  2008
Kohl's McAllen TX 3,375
 1,286
 7,321
 
 8,607
 (1,872) 2/7/2014  2005
Austin Custom Winery Sunset Valley TX 16,393
 14,283
 28,351
 3,071
 45,705
 (7,854) 2/7/2014  2007
Aaron's Valley AL 
 141
 827
 
 968
 (236) 2/7/2014  2009

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Mercedes TX 
 215
 859
 
 1,074
 (211) 8/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Mission TX 
 158
 894
 
 1,052
 (241) 3/27/2013 2013
Dollar General Moody TX 
 41
 781
 
 822
 (199) 6/11/2013 2013
Dollar General Mount Pleasant TX 
 214
 858
 
 1,072
 (250) 8/31/2012 2009
Dollar General New Braunfels TX 
 205
 818
 
 1,023
 (238) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General New Braunfels TX 
 95
 855
 
 950
 (234) 2/14/2013 2013
Dollar General New Braunfels TX 
 156
 883
 
 1,039
 (209) 10/30/2013 2013
Dollar General Orange TX 
 277
 1,150
 
 1,427
 (230) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Poteet TX 400
 96
 864
 
 960
 (272) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Presidio TX 
 72
 1,370
 
 1,442
 (369) 3/28/2013 2013
Dollar General Progreso TX 400
 169
 957
 
 1,126
 (301) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Rio Grande City TX 300
 137
 779
 
 916
 (245) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General Rio Grande City TX 
 163
 652
 
 815
 (199) 2/1/2012 2011
Dollar General Roma TX 500
 253
 1,010
 
 1,263
 (318) 10/31/2011 2010
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 252
 756
 
 1,008
 (217) 10/22/2012 2012
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 222
 888
 
 1,110
 (255) 10/22/2012 2012
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 163
 926
 
 1,089
 (254) 2/14/2013 2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 271
 812
 
 1,083
 (211) 5/23/2013 2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 239
 956
 
 1,195
 (257) 3/11/2013 2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 220
 880
 
 1,100
 (220) 7/9/2013 2013
Dollar General San Antonio TX 
 333
 776
 
 1,109
 (191) 8/13/2013 2013
Dollar General San Benito TX 
 202
 807
 
 1,009
 (198) 8/23/2013 2013
Dollar General San Juan TX 
 169
 956
 
 1,125
 (222) 11/15/2013 2013
Dollar General San Leon TX 
 87
 786
 
 873
 (227) 9/25/2012 2012
Dollar General Silsbee TX 
 43
 810
 
 853
 (238) 7/6/2012 2012
Dollar General Skidmore TX 
 90
 811
 
 901
 (222) 2/14/2013 2013
Dollar General Sullivan City TX 
 165
 876
 
 1,041
 (191) 2/26/2014 2014
Dollar General Texarkana TX 
 136
 772
 
 908
 (182) 10/25/2013 2013
Dollar General Troy TX 
 93
 841
 
 934
 (243) 9/12/2012 2012
Dollar General Tyler TX 
 219
 875
 
 1,094
 (255) 8/31/2012 2010
Dollar General Tyler TX 
 602
 956
 
 1,558
 (212) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar General Victoria TX 
 91
 817
 
 908
 (228) 1/31/2013 2013

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Aaron's Springdale AR 
 513
 916
 
 1,429
 (284) 2/7/2014  2009
Aaron's Auburndale FL 
 1,351
 5,127
 
 6,478
 (1,513) 2/7/2014  2009
Aaron's Redford MI 
 125
 698
 
 823
 (227) 2/7/2014  1972
Aaron's Bowling Green OH 
 326
 928
 
 1,254
 (289) 2/7/2014  2009
Aaron's North Olmsted OH 
 218
 753
 
 971
 (248) 2/7/2014  1960
Aaron's Bloomsburg PA 
 224
 856
 
 1,080
 (245) 2/7/2014  1996
Aaron's Mission TX 
 324
 954
 
 1,278
 (272) 2/7/2014  2009
Aaron's Oneonta AL 614
 205
 1,080
 
 1,285
 (325) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Lafayette IN 550
 404
 652
 
 1,056
 (221) 2/7/2014  1989
Aaron's Magnolia MS 1,473
 287
 2,791
 
 3,078
 (758) 2/7/2014  2000
Aaron's Kennett MO 319
 203
 473
 
 676
 (150) 2/7/2014  1999
Aaron's Charlotte NC 579
 308
 1,201
 
 1,509
 (332) 2/7/2014  1994
Aaron's Kent OH 614
 245
 1,080
 
 1,325
 (346) 2/7/2014  1999
Aaron's Marion SC 319
 100
 685
 
 785
 (198) 2/7/2014  2008
Aaron's Kingsville TX 599
 345
 1,040
 
 1,385
 (298) 2/7/2014  2009
Home Depot Evans GA 
 4,583
 
 
 4,583
 
 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Birmingham AL 1,464
 996
 3,005
 102
 4,103
 (965) 2/7/2014  1999
Northern Tool & Equipment Ocala FL 1,549
 1,693
 2,727
 
 4,420
 (797) 2/7/2014  2008
CVS New Port Richey FL 1,570
 1,149
 2,966
 
 4,115
 (886) 2/7/2014  2004
Advance Auto Parts Delaware OH 685
 502
 1,274
 
 1,776
 (357) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Canton OH 619
 443
 1,206
 
 1,649
 (352) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Twinsburg OH 600
 486
 1,004
 
 1,490
 (286) 2/7/2014  2009
Advance Auto Parts Toledo OH 600
 116
 1,375
 
 1,491
 (374) 2/7/2014  2009
Advance Auto Parts Holland OH 628
 131
 1,453
 
 1,584
 (394) 2/7/2014  2008
Applebee's Marion IL 
 855
 1,527
 
 2,382
 (514) 2/7/2014  1998
Applebee's Joplin MO 
 754
 1,829
 
 2,583
 (638) 2/7/2014  1994
Applebee's Farmington MO 
 574
 2,242
 
 2,816
 (725) 2/7/2014  1999
Applebee's Rolla MO 
 671
 2,272
 
 2,943
 (735) 2/7/2014  1997
National Tire & Battery Nashville TN 
 603
 1,373
 
 1,976
 (376) 2/7/2014  1978
Kum & Go Sloan IA 
 447
 2,162
 
 2,609
 (739) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Summerdale AL 1,136
 276
 2,470
 
 2,746
 (609) 2/7/2014  2010
Tractor Supply Pearsall TX 1,127
 318
 2,551
 
 2,869
 (601) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Tucson AZ 
 1,234
 5,143
 
 6,377
 (1,521) 2/7/2014  2003

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Vidor TX 
 
 1,182
 
 1,182
 (237) 2/7/2014 2012
Dollar General Waco TX 
 192
 767
 
 959
 (223) 8/31/2012 2012
Dollar General Weslaco TX 
 215
 862
 
 1,077
 (249) 9/24/2012 2012
Dollar General Weslaco TX 
 205
 822
 
 1,027
 (194) 10/16/2013 2013
Dollar General Burkeville VA 
 160
 906
 
 1,066
 (270) 5/8/2012 2012
Dollar General Danville VA 300
 155
 621
 
 776
 (190) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Hopewell VA 500
 584
 713
 
 1,297
 (218) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Hot Springs VA 400
 283
 661
 
 944
 (202) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Richmond VA 400
 242
 726
 
 968
 (222) 2/6/2012 2011
Dollar General Mellen WI 300
 79
 711
 
 790
 (221) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Minong WI 300
 38
 727
 
 765
 (225) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Solon Springs WI 300
 76
 685
 
 761
 (212) 12/30/2011 2011
Dollar General Chelyan WV 
 273
 1,092
 
 1,365
 (263) 9/27/2013 2013
Dollar General Cowen WV 
 196
 783
 
 979
 (218) 1/16/2013 2012
Dollar General Elkview WV 
 274
 823
 
 1,097
 (202) 8/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Mcmechen WV 
 91
 819
 
 910
 (228) 1/9/2013 2012
Dollar General Millwood WV 
 98
 881
 
 979
 (221) 7/2/2013 2013
Dollar General Oceana WV 
 317
 1,023
 
 1,340
 (146) 11/20/2014 2014
Dollar Tree Huntsville AL 
 476
 1,092
 
 1,568
 (153) 8/29/2014 2014
Dollar Tree Beverly Hills FL 
 409
 965
 
 1,374
 (141) 8/28/2014 2013
Dollar Tree Bonita Springs FL 
 672
 918
 
 1,590
 (207) 2/7/2014 2013
Dollar Tree Chiefland FL 
 322
 1,123
 
 1,445
 (239) 3/31/2014 2013
Dollar Tree Ormond Beach FL 
 573
 860
 
 1,433
 (219) 6/4/2013 2008
Dollar Tree Oviedo FL 
 469
 848
 
 1,317
 (186) 2/19/2014 2013
Dollar Tree Des Moines IA 
 152
 863
 6
 1,021
 (213) 8/30/2013 1995
Dollar Tree Lombard IL 
 1,008
 543
 
 1,551
 (123) 12/12/2013 1967
Dollar Tree Baton Rouge LA 
 377
 716
 
 1,093
 (160) 2/7/2014 2003
Dollar Tree Burton MI 866
 131
 1,164
 
 1,295
 (252) 2/7/2014 2003
Dollar Tree Winona MS 
 146
 585
 
 731
 (172) 7/31/2012 2012
Dollar Tree Hoosick Falls NY 
 181
 724
 
 905
 (191) 4/26/2013 2013
Duluth Trading Co Avon OH 
 1,088
 3,671
 
 4,759
 (27) 10/20/2017 2017
Duluth Trading Co Waukesha WI 
 857
 4,067
 
 4,924
 (5) 12/14/2017 2017

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Durham NC 2,678
 2,201
 2,923
 
 5,124
 (1,041) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Leland NC 
 1,226
 3,681
 
 4,907
 (1,126) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Janesville WI 2,101
 593
 4,009
 
 4,602
 (1,195) 2/7/2014  2010
Whole Foods Hinsdale IL 5,709
 5,499
 7,388
 1
 12,888
 (2,302) 2/7/2014  1999
FedEx Plattsburg NY 2,614
 801
 3,982
 
 4,783
 (1,143) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Kenedy TX 1,145
 309
 2,372
 
 2,681
 (553) 2/7/2014  2010
Academy Sports + Outdoors Killeen TX 3,116
 2,779
 5,321
 
 8,100
 (1,429) 2/7/2014  2009
O'Reilly Auto Parts Central LA 
 104
 915
 
 1,019
 (262) 2/7/2014  2010
FedEx Lafayette IN 2,093
 768
 4,128
 
 4,896
 (1,031) 2/7/2014  2008
Experian Schaumburg IL 
 5,935
 26,003
 (5,778) 26,160
 (3,747) 2/7/2014  1986
Cracker Barrel Evans GA 6,317
 3,452
 9,821
 24
 13,297
 (2,824) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Glenpool OK 1,180
 359
 2,447
 
 2,806
 (593) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Stillwater OK 1,205
 205
 2,715
 
 2,920
 (654) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Gibsonia PA 
 1,044
 2,778
 61
 3,883
 (699) 2/7/2014  2009
Kohl's Rice Lake WI 
 1,268
 7,788
 
 9,056
 (1,937) 2/7/2014  2011
Walgreens Lancaster CA 2,719
 859
 4,246
 
 5,105
 (1,366) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Rocky Mount NC 2,811
 1,105
 4,046
 
 5,151
 (1,356) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Murphy NC 1,402
 990
 2,090
 
 3,080
 (538) 2/7/2014  2010
Walgreens Beloit WI 2,184
 721
 3,653
 
 4,374
 (1,113) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Ballinger TX 
 476
 2,477
 
 2,953
 (579) 2/7/2014  2010
Igloo Katy TX 
 5,617
 38,470
 
 44,087
 (9,706) 2/7/2014  2004
AutoZone Hamilton OH 
 507
 1,283
 
 1,790
 (362) 2/7/2014  2008
AutoZone Mt. Orab OH 
 258
 1,219
 
 1,477
 (341) 2/7/2014  2009
AutoZone Blanchester OH 535
 341
 838
 
 1,179
 (242) 2/7/2014  2008
AutoZone Trenton OH 
 306
 812
 
 1,118
 (231) 2/7/2014  2008
AutoZone Nashville TN 861
 555
 1,270
 
 1,825
 (358) 2/7/2014  2009
Staples Houston TX 1,815
 1,169
 3,192
 
 4,361
 (804) 2/7/2014  2008
Lowe's Sanford ME 4,672
 4,045
 
 
 4,045
 
 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Ft. Myers FL 3,025
 2,335
 3,502
 
 5,837
 (1,148) 2/7/2014  2009
On the Border Columbus OH 1,925
 1,594
 1,558
 
 3,152
 (604) 2/7/2014  1997
On the Border Concord Mills NC 
 1,903
 1,456
 
 3,359
 (545) 2/7/2014  2000
On the Border Denton TX 
 1,419
 2,012
 
 3,431
 (677) 2/7/2014  2002
On the Border DeSoto TX 
 751
 3,207
 
 3,958
 (1,014) 2/7/2014  1998

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dunkin Donuts/Baskin-Robbins Dearborn Heights MI 
 230
 846
 
 1,076
 (209) 6/27/2013 1995
Earhart Corporate Center Ann Arbor MI 27,070
 3,520
 39,639
 (7,267) 35,892
 (2,366) 11/5/2013 2006
Eastchase Central Montgomery AL 
 1,480
 9,117
 
 10,597
 (39) 11/17/2017 2017
Eegee's Tucson AZ 
 357
 436
 
 793
 (102) 7/31/2013 1990
Einstein Bros. Bagels Dearborn MI 
 190
 724
 
 914
 (179) 6/27/2013 1995
El Chico Killeen TX 
 534
 992
 (803) 723
 (75) 7/31/2013 1993
Elite Production Services Cuero TX 
 127
 982
 
 1,109
 (155) 6/25/2014 2014
EMC Corporation Bedford MA 51,345
 16,594
 75,137
 203
 91,934
 (13,547) 2/7/2014 2001
Emdeon Business Services Nashville TN 4,700
 688
 10,417
 
 11,105
 (1,690) 2/7/2014 2010
Energy Maintenance Services US Pasadena TX 
 393
 2,878
 
 3,271
 (454) 6/12/2014 2011
Evans Exchange Evans GA 6,517
 3,452
 9,821
 18
 13,291
 (2,010) 2/7/2014 2009
Experian Schaumburg IL 
 5,935
 26,003
 (5,777) 26,161
 (1,911) 2/7/2014 1986
Express Energy Services Pleasanton TX 
 413
 5,541
 
 5,954
 (877) 6/12/2014 2012
Express Scripts St. Louis MO 
 5,706
 32,333
 
 38,039
 (10,515) 1/25/2012 2011
Exterran Energy Solutions Fort Worth TX 
 1,360
 5,704
 
 7,064
 (895) 9/5/2014 2011
Family Dollar Bessemer AL 
 295
 1,301
 
 1,596
 (227) 6/16/2014 2014
Family Dollar Camden AL 
 137
 851
 
 988
 (162) 5/29/2014 2014
Family Dollar Grove Hill AL 
 144
 741
 
 885
 (108) 7/24/2014 2013
Family Dollar Hayneville AL 
 172
 722
 
 894
 (148) 5/7/2014 2013
Family Dollar Hoover AL 
 368
 1,153
 
 1,521
 (168) 8/29/2014 2014
Family Dollar Huntsville AL 
 628
 924
 
 1,552
 (115) 1/12/2015 2014
Family Dollar Jemison AL 757
 143
 997
 
 1,140
 (217) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Marion AL 
 247
 780
 
 1,027
 (115) 7/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Millbrook AL 
 316
 1,052
 
 1,368
 (152) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Montgomery AL 
 218
 847
 
 1,065
 (123) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Montgomery AL 959
 533
 936
 
 1,469
 (208) 2/7/2014 2010
Family Dollar Wilmer AL 
 221
 791
 
 1,012
 (149) 5/29/2014 2014
Family Dollar El Dorado AR 
 151
 806
 
 957
 (136) 8/28/2014 1988
Family Dollar El Dorado AR 663
 49
 1,003
 
 1,052
 (204) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Hot Springs AR 
 247
 845
 
 1,092
 (179) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Jacksonville AR 571
 155
 758
 
 913
 (155) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Little Rock AR 467
 125
 629
 
 754
 (128) 2/7/2014 2002

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Chilis Flanders NJ 1,508
 1,402
 842
 
 2,244
 (428) 2/7/2014  2003
On the Border Garland TX 
 1,065
 1,692
 
 2,757
 (563) 2/7/2014  2007
On the Border Kansas CIty MO 1,454
 1,743
 1,039
 
 2,782
 (425) 2/7/2014  1997
On the Border Lees Summit MO 1,200
 1,647
 1,008
 
 2,655
 (406) 2/7/2014  2002
On the Border Alpharetta GA 
 1,771
 1,842
 
 3,613
 (619) 2/7/2014  1997
On the Border Auburn Hills MI 
 1,355
 2,745
 
 4,100
 (864) 2/7/2014  1999
On the Border Buford GA 
 1,786
 1,506
 
 3,292
 (514) 2/7/2014  2001
On the Border Burleson TX 
 891
 2,844
 
 3,735
 (936) 2/7/2014  2000
On the Border Lubbock TX 
 375
 3,679
 
 4,054
 (1,129) 2/7/2014  1994
On the Border Mesa AZ 1,804
 2,090
 1,534
 
 3,624
 (519) 2/7/2014  1998
On the Border Mount Laurel NJ 713
 1,446
 1,938
 
 3,384
 (654) 2/7/2014  2004
On the Border Novi MI 
 444
 3,176
 
 3,620
 (968) 2/7/2014  1997
On the Border Oklahoma City OK 
 859
 2,310
 
 3,169
 (779) 2/7/2014  1996
On the Border Peoria AZ 1,562
 2,129
 1,352
 
 3,481
 (422) 2/7/2014  1998
On the Border Rockwall TX 
 693
 3,244
 
 3,937
 (965) 2/7/2014  1999
On the Border Rogers AR 950
 655
 1,500
 
 2,155
 (503) 2/7/2014  2002
On the Border Tulsa OK 
 740
 2,956
 
 3,696
 (974) 2/7/2014  1995
On the Border West Springfield MA 2,000
 413
 4,173
 
 4,586
 (1,332) 2/7/2014  1995
On the Border W. Windsor NJ 2,433
 1,489
 1,703
 
 3,192
 (740) 2/7/2014  1998
AutoZone Pearl River LA 
 239
 1,193
 
 1,432
 (345) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Ranchito TX 
 498
 2,671
 
 3,169
 (814) 2/7/2014  2010
Stripes Mission TX 
 742
 550
 
 1,292
 (162) 2/7/2014  1986
Stripes Edinburg TX 
 1,286
 1,546
 
 2,832
 (486) 2/7/2014  1999
Stripes Eagle Pass TX 
 762
 2,453
 
 3,215
 (765) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Belchertown MA 
 1,148
 3,179
 
 4,327
 (815) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Southwick MA 
 1,601
 3,583
 
 5,184
 (909) 2/7/2014  2008
AutoZone Rapid City SD 571
 375
 969
 
 1,344
 (267) 2/7/2014  2008
Crunch Fitness Montgomery AL 3,148
 1,370
 5,749
 (4,152) 2,967
 (147) 2/7/2014  2003
Vacant Flanders NJ 915
 1,468
 883
 (1,154) 1,197
 (35) 2/7/2014  2003
Chilis Mt. Laurel NJ 1,447
 1,332
 1,792
 
 3,124
 (413) 2/7/2014  2004
Brick House Tavern & Tap W. Windsor NJ 1,043
 1,307
 1,498
 
 2,805
 (399) 2/7/2014  1998
AutoZone Hartville OH 614
 197
 1,156
 
 1,353
 (331) 2/7/2014  2008
Tire Kingdom Auburndale FL 1,204
 609
 1,571
 
 2,180
 (462) 2/7/2014  2010

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Ash Fork AZ 
 123
 1,015
 
 1,138
 (147) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Avondale AZ 974
 603
 882
 
 1,485
 (197) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Casa Grande AZ 
 454
 313
 
 767
 (78) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Coolidge AZ 603
 126
 785
 
 911
 (170) 2/7/2014 2000
Family Dollar Duncan AZ 
 98
 895
 
 993
 (130) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Fort Mohave AZ 
 302
 571
 
 873
 (131) 2/7/2014 2001
Family Dollar Golden Valley AZ 
 110
 772
 
 882
 (131) 8/28/2014 2001
Family Dollar Guadalupe AZ 
 400
 584
 
 984
 (134) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Mohave Valley AZ 
 302
 281
 
 583
 (70) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 303
 712
 
 1,015
 (118) 8/28/2014 2004
Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 416
 1,229
 
 1,645
 (174) 8/28/2014 2013

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Home Depot Slidell LA 
 5,131
 
 
 5,131
 
 2/7/2014  1998
Lowe's Ticonderoga NY 
 1,812
 
 
 1,812
 
 2/7/2014  2009
Advance Auto Parts Sapulpa OK 
 362
 1,300
 
 1,662
 (343) 2/7/2014  2007
LA Fitness Dallas TX 4,712
 2,629
 10,413
 
 13,042
 (2,902) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Franklin IN 738
 511
 1,256
 
 1,767
 (340) 2/7/2014  2010
Advance Auto Parts Grand Rapids MI 
 368
 1,296
 
 1,664
 (342) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Alton IL 1,404
 565
 3,062
 59
 3,686
 (742) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Union MO 1,404
 589
 3,012
 13
 3,614
 (714) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Troy MO 1,286
 730
 2,587
 
 3,317
 (626) 2/7/2014  2009
FedEx Northwood OH 2,410
 674
 5,497
 538
 6,709
 (1,462) 2/7/2014  1998
Academy Sports + Outdoors Austin TX 
 4,216
 8,755
 
 12,971
 (2,174) 2/7/2014  1988
CVS Mishawaka IN 2,258
 409
 4,532
 
 4,941
 (1,363) 2/7/2014  2007
CarMax Austin TX 9,900
 5,461
 16,940
 
 22,401
 (4,605) 2/7/2014  2004
Tractor Supply Nixa MO 1,346
 476
 2,040
 
 2,516
 (511) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Lawrence KS 1,377
 361
 2,637
 32
 3,030
 (654) 2/7/2014  2010
CVS Ringgold GA 
 1,346
 2,939
 
 4,285
 (948) 2/7/2014  2007
Tractor Supply Sellersburg IN 1,433
 762
 2,146
 
 2,908
 (540) 2/7/2014  2010
Tractor Supply Augusta ME 1,423
 530
 2,756
 
 3,286
 (700) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Wauseon OH 1,374
 931
 2,128
 
 3,059
 (558) 2/7/2014  2007
CVS Gulf Breeze FL 
 545
 
 
 545
 
 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Dixon CA 
 1,619
 4,044
 
 5,663
 (1,030) 2/7/2014  2007
Best Buy Port Arthur TX 8,077
 3,331
 14,992
 270
 18,593
 (4,066) 2/7/2014  2008
CVS Weaverville NC 3,098
 1,998
 4,307
 
 6,305
 (1,381) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Hamilton OH 932
 675
 1,472
 
 2,147
 (538) 2/7/2014  1975
LA Fitness Oakdale MN 4,749
 2,315
 8,315
 
 10,630
 (2,535) 2/7/2014  2009
Advance Auto Parts Bonita Springs FL 1,561
 1,219
 1,552
 
 2,771
 (476) 2/7/2014  2007
Kohl's Salina KS 
 964
 5,009
 60
 6,033
 (1,258) 2/7/2014  2009
FedEx Bossier City LA 
 295
 6,223
 
 6,518
 (1,685) 2/7/2014  2009
Advance Auto Parts Janesville WI 
 299
 1,695
 
 1,994
 (468) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Appleton WI 
 498
 1,228
 
 1,726
 (349) 2/7/2014  2007
Albertson's Phoenix AZ 
 2,456
 4,628
 
 7,084
 (1,405) 2/7/2014  1998
Albertson's Mesa AZ 
 1,944
 4,145
 
 6,089
 (1,270) 2/7/2014  1997
Albertson's Tucson AZ 
 2,710
 7,704
 
 10,414
 (2,360) 2/7/2014  2000

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 1,109
 767
 
 1,876
 (181) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 1,040
 504
 1,079
 
 1,583
 (237) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Dacano CO 757
 155
 959
 
 1,114
 (212) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Fort Lupton CO 916
 154
 1,180
 
 1,334
 (259) 2/7/2014 1961
Family Dollar Rangely CO 
 66
 593
 
 659
 (177) 5/4/2012 2010
Family Dollar New Britain CT 
 484
 1,280
 26
 1,790
 (176) 10/14/2014 2013
Family Dollar Wilmington DE 
 540
 1,218
 
 1,758
 (145) 4/21/2015 2015
Family Dollar Altha FL 
 126
 727
 
 853
 (163) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Anthony FL 
 242
 1,037
 
 1,279
 (154) 10/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Apopka FL 1,127
 518
 1,402
 
 1,920
 (282) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Auburndale FL 
 314
 951
 
 1,265
 (137) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Belleview FL 
 332
 829
 
 1,161
 (174) 2/7/2014 2013
Family Dollar Bristol FL 631
 202
 727
 
 929
 (165) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Bunnell FL 
 188
 936
 
 1,124
 (137) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Cape Coral FL 
 675
 1,190
 
 1,865
 (255) 3/5/2014 2013
Family Dollar Citra FL 
 47
 1,038
 
 1,085
 (149) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Clearwater FL 
 425
 1,006
 
 1,431
 (141) 8/22/2014 2014
Family Dollar Deland FL 1,057
 492
 1,293
 
 1,785
 (264) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Deltona FL 686
 171
 1,074
 
 1,245
 (209) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Deltona FL 1,042
 206
 1,578
 
 1,784
 (315) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Fort Meade FL 417
 211
 606
 
 817
 (114) 2/7/2014 2000
Family Dollar Fort Myers FL 973
 189
 1,344
 
 1,533
 (281) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Fountain FL 
 202
 825
 
 1,027
 (121) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Gainesville FL 1,002
 423
 1,263
 (16) 1,670
 (256) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Graceville FL 
 367
 810
 
 1,177
 (171) 4/30/2014 2013
Family Dollar Jacksonville FL 1,028
 271
 1,121
 
 1,392
 (221) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Jacksonville FL 789
 545
 1,173
 
 1,718
 (241) 2/7/2014 2008
Family Dollar Lake Alfred FL 
 484
 1,006
 
 1,490
 (114) 12/23/2014 2014
Family Dollar Lake City FL 622
 186
 872
 
 1,058
 (178) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Lake Panasoffkee FL 
 237
 696
 
 933
 (150) 3/25/2014 2013
Family Dollar Lakeland FL 732
 339
 785
 
 1,124
 (172) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Largo FL 
 844
 962
 
 1,806
 (211) 2/7/2014 2013
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
WaWa Portsmouth VA 
 1,573
 
 
 1,573
 
 2/7/2014  2008
CVS Lynchburg VA 
 914
 2,987
 99
 4,000
 (912) 2/7/2014  1999
CVS Madison Heights VA 
 1,015
 2,589
 69
 3,673
 (780) 2/7/2014  1997
Applebee's Wytheville VA 
 564
 923
 
 1,487
 (414) 2/7/2014  2000
Applebee's West Memphis AR 
 388
 1,536
 
 1,924
 (490) 2/7/2014  2006
Applebee's Swansea IL 
 727
 1,741
 
 2,468
 (568) 2/7/2014  1998
Applebee's Norton VA 
 848
 433
 
 1,281
 (315) 2/7/2014  2006
Applebee's Adrian MI 
 407
 2,351
 
 2,758
 (765) 2/7/2014  1995
Applebee's Chambersburg PA 
 591
 2,416
 
 3,007
 (693) 2/7/2014  1995
Applebee's Horn Lake MS 
 584
 1,642
 (8) 2,218
 (520) 2/7/2014  2005
Applebee's Kalamazoo MI 
 575
 2,644
 
 3,219
 (759) 2/7/2014  1994
Big O Tires Phoenix AZ 
 206
 1,367
 
 1,573
 (369) 2/7/2014  2010
Applebee's Bartlett TN 
 315
 2,201
 
 2,516
 (673) 2/7/2014  2005
Applebee's Tyler TX 
 696
 2,904
 
 3,600
 (911) 2/7/2014  1990
CompUSA Arlington TX 
 2,437
 1,467
 127
 4,031
 (550) 2/7/2014  1992
Albertson's Lake Havasu City AZ 
 1,275
 5,396
 
 6,671
 (1,715) 2/7/2014  2003
Albertson's Yuma AZ 
 1,574
 6,452
 
 8,026
 (1,981) 2/7/2014  2003
Albertson's Scottsdale AZ 
 2,872
 7,943
 
 10,815
 (2,413) 2/7/2014  1991
Albertson's Tucson AZ 
 1,642
 3,587
 
 5,229
 (1,129) 2/7/2014  1994
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 2,146
 4,678
 
 6,824
 (1,499) 2/7/2014  2000
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 1,833
 7,311
 
 9,144
 (2,185) 2/7/2014  2004
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 1,833
 4,528
 
 6,361
 (1,412) 2/7/2014  2002
Albertson's Fort Worth TX 
 1,174
 6,255
 
 7,429
 (1,844) 2/7/2014  1988
Albertson's Lafayette LA 
 1,556
 7,926
 
 9,482
 (2,526) 2/7/2014  2000
Albertson's Bossier City LA 
 1,949
 5,125
 
 7,074
 (1,568) 2/7/2014  1988
Albertson's Baton Rouge LA 
 1,711
 7,061
 
 8,772
 (2,202) 2/7/2014  1991
Albertson's Albuquerque NM 
 2,950
 3,388
 
 6,338
 (1,428) 2/7/2014  1978
Albertson's Abilene TX 
 1,187
 6,373
 
 7,560
 (1,932) 2/7/2014  1984
Albertson's Alexandria LA 
 1,423
 6,024
 
 7,447
 (1,900) 2/7/2014  1990
Albertson's Fort Collins CO 
 1,288
 6,612
 
 7,900
 (1,995) 2/7/2014  1996
Albertson's El Paso TX 
 1,375
 6,447
 
 7,822
 (2,014) 2/7/2014  1978
Albertson's Farmington NM 
 1,442
 2,505
 
 3,947
 (977) 2/7/2014  2002



F-132


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Albertson's Denver CO 
 2,058
 5,286
 
 7,344
 (1,573) 2/7/2014  2002
Tractor Supply Little Rock AR 1,500
 930
 2,035
 
 2,965
 (501) 2/7/2014  2009
Albertson's Los Lunas NM 
 1,105
 4,770
 
 5,875
 (1,743) 2/7/2014  1991
Albertson's Midland TX 
 1,002
 9,885
 
 10,887
 (2,944) 2/7/2014  1984
Albertson's Odessa TX 
 947
 8,867
 
 9,814
 (2,610) 2/7/2014  1985
Albertson's Weatherford TX 
 1,820
 5,771
 
 7,591
 (1,780) 2/7/2014  2001
Tractor Supply Jefferson City MO 1,125
 490
 1,877
 98
 2,465
 (389) 2/7/2014  2009
Petco Lake Charles LA 2,145
 690
 4,072
 54
 4,816
 (1,104) 2/7/2014  2008
GetGo Lancaster OH 
 2,210
 15,649
 
 17,859
 (3,948) 2/7/2014  2008
7-Eleven Carrizo Springs TX 
 496
 2,526
 
 3,022
 (843) 2/7/2014  2010
7-Eleven Laredo TX 
 581
 2,367
 
 2,948
 (774) 2/7/2014  2010
Stripes Haskell TX 
 143
 2,554
 
 2,697
 (825) 2/7/2014  2010
Stripes Laredo TX 
 626
 2,338
 
 2,964
 (779) 2/7/2014  2010
Ulta Beauty Jackson TN 1,454
 547
 2,123
 
 2,670
 (566) 2/7/2014  2010
Wal-Mart Pueblo CO 8,249
 2,586
 12,512
 
 15,098
 (3,843) 2/7/2014  1998
CVS Auburndale FL 
 1,418
 2,038
 
 3,456
 (616) 2/7/2014  1999
Arby's Daytona Beach FL 16,557
 4,598
 28,511
 (18,163) 14,946
 (730) 2/7/2014  1986
AAA Oklahoma City OK 
 3,639
 32,567
 178
 36,384
 (9,182) 2/7/2014  2009
NTT Data Lincoln NE 
 2,812
 25,566
 (355) 28,023
 (7,308) 2/7/2014  2009
Hanesbrands Rural Hall NC 
 1,798
 41,214
 (50) 42,962
 (10,677) 2/7/2014  1992
Best Buy Pineville NC 
 1,818
 7,970
 
 9,788
 (2,343) 2/7/2014  1994
Tractor Supply Franklin NC 1,479
 434
 2,629
 
 3,063
 (646) 2/7/2014  2009
Walgreens Matteson IL 2,450
 416
 4,070
 
 4,486
 (1,150) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Sedalia MO 1,090
 480
 1,782
 
 2,262
 (458) 2/7/2014  2010
Childtime Modesto CA 
 280
 1,524
 
 1,804
 (430) 2/7/2014  1988
Sherwin-Williams Muskegon MI 
 187
 1,524
 
 1,711
 (437) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Grayson GA 2,720
 947
 3,747
 1
 4,695
 (1,107) 2/7/2014  2004
Walgreens Tucson AZ 2,910
 1,406
 3,571
 
 4,977
 (1,078) 2/7/2014  2004
Tutor Time Downingtown PA 
 205
 2,788
 
 2,993
 (784) 2/7/2014  1998
Tutor Time Austin TX 
 417
 1,861
 
 2,278
 (547) 2/7/2014  2000
Children's Courtyard Grand Prairie TX 
 367
 1,055
 
 1,422
 (309) 2/7/2014  1999
Childtime Oklahoma City OK 
 124
 796
 
 920
 (243) 2/7/2014  1985
Childtime Oklahoma City OK 
 108
 793
 
 901
 (235) 2/7/2014  1986

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Middleburg FL 
 274
 822
 
 1,096
 (210) 6/4/2013 2008
Family Dollar Milton FL 644
 544
 683
 
 1,227
 (130) 2/7/2014 2010
Family Dollar Mulberry FL 
 131
 1,156
 
 1,287
 (165) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Ocala FL 
 108
 816
 
 924
 (124) 8/28/2014 2005
Family Dollar Ocala FL 
 344
 1,251
 
 1,595
 (251) 2/7/2014 2006
Family Dollar Ocala FL 968
 554
 984
 
 1,538
 (212) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Okeechobee FL 894
 655
 580
 
 1,235
 (148) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Orlando FL 
 349
 1,294
 
 1,643
 (182) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Orlando FL 
 291
 1,286
 
 1,577
 (181) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Ormond Beach FL 
 675
 1,152
 
 1,827
 (233) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Palatka FL 
 316
 1,054
 
 1,370
 (221) 4/25/2014 2014
Family Dollar Pembroke Park FL 1,141
 656
 944
 
 1,600
 (225) 2/7/2014 2006
Family Dollar Pensacola FL 
 69
 1,085
 
 1,154
 (153) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Pensacola FL 559
 146
 907
 
 1,053
 (174) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Plant City FL 
 279
 1,040
 
 1,319
 (210) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Plant City FL 1,173
 712
 1,113
 
 1,825
 (244) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Sebring FL 
 492
 1,063
 
 1,555
 (162) 6/24/2014 2014
Family Dollar St Petersburg FL 1,093
 690
 1,000
 
 1,690
 (222) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Tallahassee FL 
 632
 871
 
 1,503
 (198) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Tampa FL 1,005
 531
 1,062
 
 1,593
 (228) 2/7/2014 2008
Family Dollar Tampa FL 1,168
 773
 1,057
 
 1,830
 (231) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Tampa FL 
 552
 792
 
 1,344
 (169) 2/7/2014 2013
Family Dollar Winter Haven FL 
 534
 942
 
 1,476
 (90) 8/8/2014 2014
Family Dollar Zellwood FL 
 272
 1,005
 
 1,277
 (141) 8/22/2014 2014
Family Dollar Abbeville GA 
 163
 768
 
 931
 (119) 5/29/2014 2014
Family Dollar Acworth GA 
 489
 901
 
 1,390
 (133) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Alma GA 
 79
 954
 
 1,033
 (137) 8/28/2014 1982
Family Dollar Claxton GA 
 322
 665
 
 987
 (137) 5/14/2014 2014
Family Dollar Cordele GA 
 136
 1,049
 
 1,185
 (161) 4/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Fayetteville GA 
 217
 1,203
 
 1,420
 (158) 11/20/2014 2014
Family Dollar Helena GA 
 242
 790
 
 1,032
 (174) 2/19/2014 2013
Family Dollar Jeffersonville GA 
 153
 926
 
 1,079
 (132) 8/15/2014 2014

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Childtime Bedford OH 
 111
 852
 
 963
 (263) 2/7/2014  1979
Healthnow Buffalo NY 40,299
 2,569
 89,399
 194
 92,162
 (19,698) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Milwaukee WI 
 610
 1,473
 
 2,083
 (405) 2/7/2014  2008
All Cleaners Bartlett IL 7,060
 4,437
 5,970
 2,555
 12,962
 (2,236) 2/7/2014  1999
CVS Boca Raton FL 2,625
 
 3,560
 
 3,560
 (1,167) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS City of Industry CA 2,500
 1,224
 3,202
 (30) 4,396
 (1,238) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Jacksonville FL 3,715
 2,240
 4,323
 
 6,563
 (1,310) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Naples FL 2,675
 
 4,164
 
 4,164
 (1,262) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Southaven MS 4,270
 1,281
 4,100
 (72) 5,309
 (1,409) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS The Village OK 3,425
 520
 4,730
 
 5,250
 (1,414) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Lawrence KS 2,908
 837
 4,392
 
 5,229
 (1,322) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Lawrenceville NJ 5,170
 2,674
 6,412
 
 9,086
 (1,900) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Mineola NY 2,280
 
 5,120
 
 5,120
 (1,494) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Lehigh Acres FL 1,425
 379
 2,016
 
 2,395
 (568) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Howell MI 830
 439
 1,471
 
 1,910
 (397) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Salem OH 660
 267
 1,147
 
 1,414
 (318) 2/7/2014  2009
Albertson's Las Cruces NM 
 1,588
 5,719
 
 7,307
 (2,158) 2/7/2014  1997
Bed Bath & Beyond Folsom CA 21,600
 10,314
 27,983
 372
 38,669
 (7,716) 2/7/2014  2006
CVS Gainesville TX 2,215
 341
 3,334
 
 3,675
 (971) 2/7/2014  2003
CVS Dover DE 2,046
 4,081
 
 
 4,081
 
 2/7/2014  2010
Staples Pensacola FL 
 1,539
 3,354
 
 4,893
 (849) 2/7/2014  2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Christiansburg VA 646
 562
 793
 
 1,355
 (219) 2/7/2014  2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts San Antonio TX 703
 439
 1,030
 
 1,469
 (280) 2/7/2014  2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Ravenna OH 
 144
 1,137
 
 1,281
 (321) 2/7/2014  2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Houston TX 560
 340
 895
 
 1,235
 (237) 2/7/2014  2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Highlands TX 485
 281
 813
 
 1,094
 (215) 2/7/2014  2010
Thorntons Clarksville IN 
 1,319
 687
 
 2,006
 (264) 2/7/2014  2005
Thorntons Jeffersonville IN 
 1,233
 1,533
 
 2,766
 (527) 2/7/2014  1995
Thorntons Franklin Park IL 
 1,403
 1,882
 
 3,285
 (597) 2/7/2014  1989
Thorntons Westmont IL 
 760
 3,069
 
 3,829
 (930) 2/7/2014  1997
Thorntons Springfield IL 
 926
 2,514
 
 3,440
 (898) 2/7/2014  1994
Thorntons Ottawa IL 
 565
 2,003
 
 2,568
 (656) 2/7/2014  2006
Thorntons Bloomington IL 
 1,184
 733
 
 1,917
 (261) 2/7/2014  1992

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Lenox GA 
 90
 809
 
 899
 (230) 11/9/2012 2012
Family Dollar Lindale GA 
 227
 966
 
 1,193
 (142) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Macon GA 
 300
 893
 
 1,193
 (130) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Macon GA 673
 230
 851
 
 1,081
 (183) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Marietta GA 
 366
 749
 
 1,115
 (165) 2/19/2014 2013
Family Dollar Marietta GA 
 582
 1,126
 
 1,708
 (162) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Omega GA 
 167
 716
 
 883
 (154) 3/12/2014 2013
Family Dollar Richland GA 
 125
 859
 
 984
 (125) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Riverdale GA 
 310
 1,188
 
 1,498
 (164) 9/26/2014 2014
Family Dollar Vienna GA 
 62
 721
 
 783
 (155) 3/12/2014 2013
Family Dollar Des Moines IA 822
 411
 871
 
 1,282
 (191) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Fort Dodge IA 408
 152
 449
 
 601
 (104) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Arco ID 
 76
 684
 
 760
 (198) 9/18/2012 2012
Family Dollar Homedale ID 973
 59
 1,387
 
 1,446
 (299) 2/7/2014 2006
Family Dollar Kimberly ID 
 219
 657
 
 876
 (174) 4/10/2013 2013
Family Dollar Mount Vernon IL 
 117
 1,050
 
 1,167
 (263) 7/11/2013 2012
Family Dollar Pulaski IL 
 31
 588
 
 619
 (166) 12/31/2012 2012
Family Dollar University Park IL 
 295
 688
 
 983
 (163) 10/29/2013 2013
Family Dollar Brookston IN 
 126
 715
 
 841
 (205) 10/1/2012 2012
Family Dollar Indianapolis IN 613
 375
 707
 
 1,082
 (139) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Lake Village IN 
 154
 752
 
 906
 (309) 4/30/2014 2013
Family Dollar Mitchell IN 
 101
 1,119
 
 1,220
 (166) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Princeton IN 526
 300
 486
 
 786
 (109) 2/7/2014 2000
Family Dollar Seymour IN 
 238
 764
 
 1,002
 (169) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Terre Haute IN 394
 235
 427
 
 662
 (91) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Greensburg KS 
 80
 718
 
 798
 (173) 9/9/2013 2012
Family Dollar Kansas City KS 
 290
 1,170
 (5) 1,455
 (178) 11/6/2014 1995
Family Dollar Kansas City KS 
 352
 1,026
 
 1,378
 (159) 12/18/2014 1995
Family Dollar Kansas City KS 982
 154
 1,367
 
 1,521
 (287) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Topeka KS 
 177
 1,405
 
 1,582
 (304) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Wichita KS 
 216
 1,035
 
 1,251
 (148) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Bowling Green KY 
 334
 951
 
 1,285
 (137) 8/28/2014 2013

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Thorntons Joliet IL 
 953
 2,539
 
 3,492
 (803) 2/7/2014  2000
Thorntons Summit IL 
 2,233
 109
 
 2,342
 (45) 2/7/2014  2000
Thorntons Waukegan IL 
 875
 1,421
 
 2,296
 (458) 2/7/2014  1999
Thorntons Plainfield IL 
 862
 1,338
 
 2,200
 (450) 2/7/2014  1995
Thorntons South Elgin IL 
 1,239
 1,688
 
 2,927
 (585) 2/7/2014  1995
Thorntons Galloway OH 
 547
 1,550
 
 2,097
 (489) 2/7/2014  1998
Thorntons Terre Haute IN 
 732
 1,829
 
 2,561
 (602) 2/7/2014  1995
Thorntons Henderson KY 
 659
 3,271
 
 3,930
 (1,039) 2/7/2014  1971
Thorntons Evansville IN 
 467
 1,479
 
 1,946
 (481) 2/7/2014  1987
Thorntons Evansville IN 
 602
 1,398
 
 2,000
 (454) 2/7/2014  1990
Thorntons Henderson KY 
 483
 1,778
 
 2,261
 (523) 2/7/2014  2007
Thorntons Shelbyville KY 
 299
 2,036
 
 2,335
 (625) 2/7/2014  1991
Thorntons Louisville KY 
 637
 1,680
 
 2,317
 (486) 2/7/2014  1994
Thorntons Edinburgh IN 
 685
 1,505
 
 2,190
 (485) 2/7/2014  1996
Thorntons Oaklawn IL 
 1,203
 898
 278
 2,379
 (307) 2/7/2014  1994
Advance Auto Parts Bedford IN 760
 100
 1,386
 
 1,486
 (386) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Bethel OH 730
 234
 1,305
 
 1,539
 (361) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Crestwood KY 1,030
 400
 1,546
 
 1,946
 (416) 2/7/2014  2009
Advance Auto Parts Louisville KY 740
 336
 1,289
 
 1,625
 (347) 2/7/2014  2009
Best Buy Indianapolis IN 
 665
 4,775
 
 5,440
 (1,410) 2/7/2014  2009
Stripes Fort Stockton TX 
 1,237
 3,812
 
 5,049
 (1,392) 2/7/2014  2010
Stripes Portales NM 
 306
 2,595
 
 2,901
 (853) 2/7/2014  2010
Bed Bath & Beyond San Marcos TX 12,480
 5,287
 20,357
 171
 25,815
 (5,533) 2/7/2014  2006
LA Fitness Indianapolis IN 
 1,279
 8,970
 
 10,249
 (2,619) 2/7/2014  2009
Best Buy Marquette MI 
 836
 4,207
 1,111
 6,154
 (1,554) 2/7/2014  2010
Family Fare Battle Creek MI 
 1,393
 7,950
 
 9,343
 (2,379) 2/7/2014  2010
Lowe's Columbia SC 
 5,485
 
 
 5,485
 
 2/7/2014  1994
Dick's Sporting Goods Jackson TN 
 1,346
 6,106
 
 7,452
 (1,793) 2/7/2014  2007
Petco Dardenne Prairie MO 
 806
 3,024
 
 3,830
 (786) 2/7/2014  2009
Kohl's Saginaw MI 
 1,110
 6,932
 104
 8,146
 (1,710) 2/7/2014  2011
St. Luke's Urgent Care Creve Coeur MO 
 1,644
 4,497
 
 6,141
 (1,436) 2/7/2014  2010
Best Buy Norton Shores MI 
 1,568
 4,099
 
 5,667
 (1,206) 2/7/2014  2001
CVS Edison NJ 
 3,318
 
 
 3,318
 
 2/7/2014  2008

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Carlisle KY 
 157
 871
 
 1,028
 (128) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Garrison KY 
 134
 737
 
 871
 (170) 2/20/2014 2012
Family Dollar Rockholds KY 
 121
 988
 
 1,109
 (147) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Abbeville LA 740
 141
 949
 
 1,090
 (209) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Alexandria LA 458
 168
 579
 
 747
 (123) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Arcadia LA 
 51
 704
 
 755
 (165) 2/20/2014 2010
Family Dollar Avondale LA 
 381
 1,255
 
 1,636
 (181) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Chalmette LA 
 751
 615
 
 1,366
 (183) 5/3/2012 2011
Family Dollar Farmerville LA 722
 110
 968
 
 1,078
 (209) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Kentwood LA 683
 117
 877
 
 994
 (194) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar New Orleans LA 1,146
 547
 1,252
 
 1,799
 (268) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Shreveport LA 892
 177
 1,177
 
 1,354
 (252) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Tickfaw LA 
 181
 543
 
 724
 (165) 3/30/2012 2011
Family Dollar Westwego LA 
 332
 1,052
 
 1,384
 (155) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Lynn MA 1,222
 400
 1,547
 
 1,947
 (324) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Barryton MI 
 32
 599
 
 631
 (169) 12/18/2012 2012
Family Dollar Birch Run MI 
 81
 729
 86
 896
 (189) 7/11/2013 1950
Family Dollar Brooklyn MI 
 150
 634
 
 784
 (140) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Detroit MI 
 130
 1,169
 
 1,299
 (332) 11/27/2012 2011
Family Dollar Detroit MI 
 106
 956
 
 1,062
 (248) 5/2/2013 1964
Family Dollar Detroit MI 
 110
 1,051
 
 1,161
 (159) 8/28/2014 2005
Family Dollar Flint MI 
 162
 1,027
 
 1,189
 (243) 2/26/2014 2014
Family Dollar Hudson MI 833
 108
 1,020
 
 1,128
 (235) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Jackson MI 
 93
 525
 
 618
 (127) 9/12/2013 2007
Family Dollar Kentwood MI 739
 389
 919
 
 1,308
 (181) 2/7/2014 2001
Family Dollar Monroe MI 
 243
 1,061
 
 1,304
 (155) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Newaygo MI 689
 317
 677
 
 994
 (156) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Pontiac MI 962
 136
 1,249
 
 1,385
 (276) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Remus MI 
 49
 992
 
 1,041
 (231) 1/2/2014 2012
Family Dollar Saginaw MI 
 164
 1,086
 
 1,250
 (242) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Tustin MI 
 33
 633
 
 666
 (178) 12/18/2012 1995
Family Dollar Crosby MN 
 49
 928
 
 977
 (232) 7/11/2013 1985

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
LA Fitness Marana AZ 
 1,284
 8,322
 
 9,606
 (2,523) 2/7/2014  2011
DaVita Dialysis Grand Rapids MI 
 215
 1,794
 
 2,009
 (450) 2/7/2014  1997
Advance Auto Parts Charlotte NC 
 723
 883
 
 1,606
 (253) 2/7/2014  2001
Advance Auto Parts Rock Hill SC 
 506
 915
 45
 1,466
 (257) 2/7/2014  1995
Walgreens Medina OH 
 820
 4,585
 81
 5,486
 (1,333) 2/7/2014  2001
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 952
 3,235
 
 4,187
 (950) 2/7/2014  2003
Walgreens Decatur GA 
 1,746
 3,337
 
 5,083
 (1,005) 2/7/2014  2001
Hobby Lobby Avon IN 
 1,439
 5,855
 115
 7,409
 (1,614) 2/7/2014  2007
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 911
 4,830
 46
 5,787
 (1,388) 2/7/2014  2000
Best Buy Kenosha WI 
 1,925
 5,503
 127
 7,555
 (1,614) 2/7/2014  2008
Bi-Lo, LLC Greenwood SC 
 533
 4,212
 
 4,745
 (1,245) 2/7/2014  1999
FedEx McComb MS 
 548
 3,268
 2,212
 6,028
 (1,135) 2/7/2014  2008
Vacant Prattville AL 
 1,038
 1,802
 (1,871) 969
 (145) 2/7/2014  1997
Golden Corral Cullman AL 
 847
 2,390
 (2,143) 1,094
 (177) 2/7/2014  1996
Vacant Columbus GA 
 1,307
 2,529
 (2,876) 960
 (152) 2/7/2014  2002
Ryan's Buffet Commerce GA 
 962
 1,470
 (647) 1,785
 (323) 2/7/2014  1996
Ryan's Buffet Rome GA 
 831
 1,848
 (918) 1,761
 (329) 2/7/2014  1983
Longhorn Steakhouse Paducah KY 
 1,121
 1,443
 (2,022) 542
 (13) 2/7/2014  1995
Golden Corral Owensboro KY 
 1,244
 1,656
 (1,942) 958
 (130) 2/7/2014  1997
Vacant Bossier City LA 
 1,168
 2,594
 (2,883) 879
 (136) 2/7/2014  2004
Golden Corral Horn Lake MS 
 925
 2,463
 (2,320) 1,068
 (173) 2/7/2014  1995
Ryan's Buffet Asheville NC 
 1,261
 2,204
 (1,180) 2,285
 (407) 2/7/2014  1996
Golden Corral Coon Rapids MN 
 1,611
 2,188
 (2,894) 905
 (111) 2/7/2014  2003
Vacant Sevierville TN 
 1,443
 430
 (750) 1,123
 (109) 2/7/2014  2003
Golden Corral Beckley WV 
 1,248
 2,258
 (2,508) 998
 (151) 2/7/2014  1995
LA Fitness Broadview IL 
 3,345
 8,763
 276
 12,384
 (2,611) 2/7/2014  2010
Glen's Market Manistee MI 
 294
 6,694
 
 6,988
 (1,890) 2/7/2014  2009
Stripes Odessa TX 
 301
 2,895
 
 3,196
 (918) 2/7/2014  2011
Banner Life Insurance Urbana MD 19,483
 2,733
 31,483
 
 34,216
 (8,103) 2/7/2014  2011
ConAgra Brands Milton PA 
 5,656
 27,242
 
 32,898
 (6,973) 2/7/2014  1991
Dahl's Johnston IA 
 3,202
 6,644
 
 9,846
 (2,021) 2/7/2014  2000
Dahl's Des Moines IA 
 2,871
 11,761
 
 14,632
 (3,459) 2/7/2014  2011
Dahl's Des Moines IA 
 628
 3,947
 
 4,575
 (1,187) 2/7/2014  1947

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Ely MN 
 231
 1,008
 
 1,239
 (227) 2/27/2014 2014
Family Dollar Intrnatnl Falls MN 
 32
 608
 
 640
 (147) 9/30/2013 1966
Family Dollar St. Peter MN 409
 93
 566
 
 659
 (116) 2/7/2014 1960
Family Dollar Berkeley MO 969
 179
 1,391
 
 1,570
 (283) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Kansas City MO 683
 277
 812
 
 1,089
 (171) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Kansas City MO 1,211
 119
 1,705
 
 1,824
 (364) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Kansas City MO 970
 142
 1,338
 
 1,480
 (283) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Marble Hill MO 
 38
 719
 
 757
 (177) 8/29/2013 2013
Family Dollar Raytown MO 
 415
 
 1,287
 1,702
 (139) 2/20/2015 2014
Family Dollar St Louis MO 
 168
 671
 (4) 835
 (200) 4/2/2012 2006
Family Dollar St Louis MO 972
 215
 1,357
 
 1,572
 (279) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar St Louis MO 
 258
 1,310
 
 1,568
 (269) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar St. Louis MO 
 445
 1,038
 
 1,483
 (298) 10/23/2012 2012
Family Dollar Bassfield MS 
 96
 752
 
 848
 (172) 2/19/2014 2013
Family Dollar Biloxi MS 
 310
 575
 
 885
 (174) 3/30/2012 2012
Family Dollar Canton MS 
 210
 1,142
 
 1,352
 (165) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Carriere MS 
 200
 599
 
 799
 (182) 3/30/2012 2012
Family Dollar D'Iberville MS 
 241
 561
 1
 803
 (168) 5/21/2012 2012
Family Dollar Drew MS 
 11
 1,039
 
 1,050
 (177) 8/28/2014 1989
Family Dollar Greenville MS 
 125
 872
 
 997
 (189) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 209
 626
 
 835
 (187) 5/21/2012 2012
Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 270
 629
 
 899
 (182) 9/20/2012 2012
Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 218
 654
 
 872
 (186) 11/15/2012 2012
Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 312
 1,237
 
 1,549
 (269) 2/7/2014 2007
Family Dollar Hattiesburg MS 
 225
 674
 
 899
 (188) 1/30/2013 2012
Family Dollar Horn Lake MS 
 225
 676
 
 901
 (197) 8/22/2012 2012
Family Dollar Kiln MS 
 106
 650
 
 756
 (185) 11/14/2012 2012
Family Dollar Laurel MS 
 225
 723
 
 948
 (166) 2/19/2014 2013
Family Dollar Natchez MS 
 289
 749
 
 1,038
 (142) 8/28/2014 1982
Family Dollar Okolona MS 
 64
 578
 
 642
 (170) 7/31/2012 2012
Family Dollar Pearl MS 
 342
 1,001
 
 1,343
 (143) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Philadelphia MS 
 53
 897
 
 950
 (132) 8/28/2014 2014

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dahl's Des Moines IA 
 1,163
 1,649
 
 2,812
 (508) 2/7/2014  1959
Advance Auto Parts Vermilion OH 
 337
 1,079
 
 1,416
 (320) 2/7/2014  2006
Advance Auto Parts Massillon OH 
 218
 1,987
 
 2,205
 (549) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Monroe MI 
 549
 1,434
 
 1,983
 (393) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts South Lyon MI 
 402
 1,607
 
 2,009
 (435) 2/7/2014  2008
Walgreens Clarkston MI 
 2,768
 3,197
 
 5,965
 (964) 2/7/2014  2000
Owens Corning Newark OH 
 725
 13,013
 
 13,738
 (3,227) 2/7/2014  2007
Tractor Supply Grayson KY 
 540
 2,709
 
 3,249
 (666) 2/7/2014  2011
California Pizza Kitchen Alpharetta GA 
 1,279
 3,249
 
 4,528
 (1,031) 2/7/2014  1994
California Pizza Kitchen Atlanta GA 
 2,307
 1,857
 
 4,164
 (639) 2/7/2014  1993
California Pizza Kitchen Grapevine TX 
 1,544
 2,250
 
 3,794
 (731) 2/7/2014  1994
California Pizza Kitchen Paradise Valley AZ 
 2,285
 1,480
 
 3,765
 (520) 2/7/2014  1994
California Pizza Kitchen Schaumburg IL 
 1,180
 3,179
 
 4,359
 (1,016) 2/7/2014  1995
CVS Evansville IN 
 227
 3,060
 
 3,287
 (909) 2/7/2014  2000
Petsmart Westlake Village CA 
 3,406
 5,017
 
 8,423
 (1,277) 2/7/2014  1998
Petsmart Boca Raton FL 
 3,514
 4,912
 
 8,426
 (1,334) 2/7/2014  2001
Petsmart Lake Mary FL 
 2,430
 2,556
 
 4,986
 (714) 2/7/2014  1997
Petsmart Plantation FL 
 965
 5,302
 
 6,267
 (1,368) 2/7/2014  2001
Petsmart Tallahassee FL 
 1,468
 1,387
 
 2,855
 (404) 2/7/2014  1998
Petsmart Evanston IL 
 1,120
 6,007
 
 7,127
 (1,524) 2/7/2014  2001
Petsmart Braintree MA 
 2,805
 8,398
 
 11,203
 (2,071) 2/7/2014  1996
Petsmart Oxon Hill MD 
 1,722
 4,389
 
 6,111
 (1,153) 2/7/2014  1998
Petsmart Flint MI 
 606
 3,839
 
 4,445
 (997) 2/7/2014 ��1996
Petsmart Dallas TX 
 470
 6,089
 
 6,559
 (1,483) 2/7/2014  1998
Petsmart Southlake TX 
 1,063
 7,093
 
 8,156
 (1,761) 2/7/2014  1998
DaVita Dialysis Augusta GA 
 118
 1,818
 47
 1,983
 (394) 2/7/2014  2000
DaVita Dialysis Douglasville GA 
 119
 1,858
 
 1,977
 (403) 2/7/2014  2001
Food Lion Moyock NC 
 1,269
 2,950
 266
 4,485
 (964) 2/7/2014  1999
Walgreens Watertown NY 
 2,937
 2,664
 
 5,601
 (815) 2/7/2014  2006
Best Buy Richmond IN 
 549
 4,429
 
 4,978
 (1,334) 2/7/2014  2011
Walgreens Bartlett TN 
 2,358
 2,194
 
 4,552
 (649) 2/7/2014  2001
Dick's Sporting Goods Charleston SC 
 3,733
 5,025
 
 8,758
 (1,579) 2/7/2014  2005
Petsmart Parma OH 
 1,288
 3,527
 
 4,815
 (917) 2/7/2014  1996

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Anaconda MT 
 164
 1,058
 
 1,222
 (159) 9/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Ennis MT 
 246
 
 773
 1,019
 (142) 1/8/2015 2014
Family Dollar Three Forks MT 
 250
 
 953
 1,203
 (88) 8/20/2014 2014
Family Dollar Whitehall MT 
 132
 
 1,064
 1,196
 (194) 3/19/2015 1995
Family Dollar Asheboro NC 
 251
 932
 
 1,183
 (139) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Boiling Springs NC 
 322
 767
 
 1,089
 (109) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Burlington NC 
 291
 694
 
 985
 (102) 8/28/2014 2012
Family Dollar Charlotte NC 
 352
 985
 
 1,337
 (206) 4/15/2014 2014
Family Dollar Charlotte NC 
 490
 1,066
 
 1,556
 (153) 7/2/2014 2014
Family Dollar Charlotte NC 
 412
 992
 
 1,404
 (145) 6/25/2014 2014
Family Dollar Ellerbe NC 
 225
 781
 
 1,006
 (146) 5/29/2014 2014
Family Dollar Fayetteville NC 
 267
 682
 
 949
 (147) 3/14/2014 2013
Family Dollar Hickory NC 
 215
 785
 
 1,000
 (115) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Hiddenite NC 
 221
 832
 
 1,053
 (122) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Liberty NC 
 243
 802
 
 1,045
 (117) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Lumberton NC 
 151
 603
 
 754
 (145) 9/11/2013 1995
Family Dollar Lumberton NC 
 146
 1,013
 
 1,159
 (152) 6/20/2014 2014
Family Dollar Parkton NC 
 164
 894
 
 1,058
 (127) 9/19/2014 2014
Family Dollar Raeford NC 
 428
 900
 
 1,328
 (189) 4/17/2014 2014
Family Dollar Raeford NC 
 185
 935
 
 1,120
 (174) 5/29/2014 2014
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Kohl's Brownsville TX 
 2,756
 3,423
 
 6,179
 (46) 2/7/2014  2007
Stop & Shop Cranston RI 
 4,309
 
 
 4,309
 
 2/7/2014  2011
Chuze Fitness Highlands Ranch CO 
 2,850
 4,795
 2,262
 9,907
 (1,311) 2/7/2014  2007
PLS Check Cashers Tucson AZ 
 264
 800
 
 1,064
 (307) 2/7/2014  2005
PLS Check Cashers Calumet Park IL 
 306
 1,003
 
 1,309
 (367) 2/7/2014  2005
PLS Check Cashers Chicago IL 
 451
 127
 
 578
 (111) 2/7/2014  2001
PLS Check Cashers Dallas TX 
 197
 1,356
 
 1,553
 (401) 2/7/2014  1983
PLS Check Cashers Dallas TX 
 169
 1,180
 
 1,349
 (353) 2/7/2014  2003
PLS Check Cashers Fort Worth TX 
 187
 1,473
 
 1,660
 (422) 2/7/2014  2003
PLS Check Cashers Grand Prairie TX 
 385
 1,056
 
 1,441
 (313) 2/7/2014  1971
PLS Check Cashers Houston TX 
 158
 1,293
 
 1,451
 (353) 2/7/2014  2005
PLS Check Cashers Kenosha WI 
 190
 693
 
 883
 (226) 2/7/2014  2005
PLS Check Cashers Mesa AZ 
 187
 759
 
 946
 (282) 2/7/2014  2006
PLS Check Cashers Mesquite TX 
 261
 1,388
 
 1,649
 (440) 2/7/2014  2006
PLS Check Cashers Phoenix AZ 
 288
 677
 
 965
 (240) 2/7/2014  2006
PLS Check Cashers Compton CA 
 475
 107
 
 582
 (91) 2/7/2014  2005
LA Fitness Duncanville TX 
 1,538
 10,023
 
 11,561
 (2,844) 2/7/2014  2007
Tractor Supply Rincon GA 
 978
 2,016
 
 2,994
 (476) 2/7/2014  2007
Petsmart Phoenix AZ 51,250
 7,308
 97,510
 678
 105,496
 (22,281) 2/7/2014  1997
LA Fitness Avondale AZ 
 2,253
 9,040
 
 11,293
 (2,645) 2/7/2014  2006
Change Healthcare Operations Nashville TN 4,700
 688
 10,417
 
 11,105
 (2,425) 2/7/2014  2010
Lowe's West Carrollton OH 
 2,864
 9,883
 
 12,747
 (2,433) 2/7/2014  1994
CarMax Henderson NV 
 8,542
 10,396
 
 18,938
 (3,144) 2/7/2014  2002
Hobby Lobby Logan UT 
 2,683
 3,079
 
 5,762
 (960) 2/7/2014  2008
Best Buy Southaven MS 
 2,045
 4,318
 
 6,363
 (1,326) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Brownstown MI 
 482
 1,760
 
 2,242
 (479) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Romulus MI 
 422
 1,568
 
 1,990
 (438) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Washington Twnshp MI 
 645
 1,711
 
 2,356
 (468) 2/7/2014  2008
BJ's Wholesale Club Deptford NJ 11,004
 6,558
 12,490
 
 19,048
 (3,104) 2/7/2014  1995
BJ's Wholesale Club Westminster MD 13,978
 6,516
 13,860
 
 20,376
 (3,803) 2/7/2014  2001
BJ's Wholesale Club Pembroke Pines FL 8,446
 5,104
 7,661
 
 12,765
 (2,251) 2/7/2014  1997
BJ's Wholesale Club Lancaster PA 13,621
 3,400
 16,782
 
 20,182
 (4,456) 2/7/2014  1996


F-138



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
BJ's Wholesale Club Greenfield MA 8,416
 2,168
 14,002
 
 16,170
 (3,381) 2/7/2014  1997
BJ's Wholesale Club Uxbridge MA 12,645
 5,538
 36,445
 
 41,983
 (8,127) 2/7/2014  2006
BJ's Wholesale Club Leominster MA 
 3,585
 21,344
 
 24,929
 (5,117) 2/7/2014  1993
BJ's Wholesale Club California MD 
 6,882
 10,196
 
 17,078
 (2,827) 2/7/2014  2003
BJ's Wholesale Club Auburn ME 
 2,674
 16,510
 
 19,184
 (3,852) 2/7/2014  1995
BJ's Wholesale Club Boynton Beach FL 
 5,569
 10,931
 (15) 16,485
 (3,097) 2/7/2014  2001
BJ's Wholesale Club Portsmouth NH 
 4,216
 25,454
 
 29,670
 (5,916) 2/7/2014  1993
BJ's Wholesale Club Jacksonville FL 
 5,929
 16,348
 
 22,277
 (4,082) 2/7/2014  2003
Golden Corral Independence MO 
 1,425
 2,437
 
 3,862
 (803) 2/7/2014  2010
CVS Cherry Hill NJ 
 2,255
 
 
 2,255
 
 2/7/2014  2011
Urban Air Adventure Park North Fayette PA 
 1,990
 2,700
 1,060
 5,750
 (751) 2/7/2014  1999
Home Depot Kennesaw GA 
 1,809
 12,331
 
 14,140
 (3,184) 2/7/2014  2012
DaVita Dialysis Willow Grove PA 
 311
 3,886
 51
 4,248
 (890) 2/7/2014  1989
CVS Northbrook IL 
 3,471
 41,765
 1,842
 47,078
 (10,761) 2/7/2014  1980
CVS Warren OH 
 560
 1,622
 75
 2,257
 (483) 2/7/2014  2008
CVS Titusville PA 
 670
 683
 71
 1,424
 (411) 2/7/2014  1998
MedAssets Plano TX 
 10,432
 45,650
 
 56,082
 (11,361) 2/7/2014  2013
Tractor Supply Bainbridge GA 
 687
 2,445
 
 3,132
 (577) 2/7/2014  2008
Tractor Supply Mishawaka IN 
 620
 2,683
 
 3,303
 (652) 2/7/2014  2011
Walgreens Albuquerque NM 
 1,173
 2,287
 
 3,460
 (695) 2/7/2014  1996
United Technologies Bradenton FL 
 2,692
 17,973
 
 20,665
 (4,259) 2/7/2014  2004
AGCO Duluth GA 8,600
 3,503
 14,842
 160
 18,505
 (3,547) 2/7/2014  1999
DaVita Dialysis Casselberry FL 
 392
 2,320
 
 2,712
 (615) 2/7/2014  2007
DaVita Dialysis Sanford FL 
 530
 2,793
 
 3,323
 (688) 2/7/2014  2005
Hobby Lobby Kannapolis NC 
 1,929
 4,227
 
 6,156
 (1,206) 2/7/2014  2004
Sam's Club Colorado Springs CO 
 3,347
 12,652
 
 15,999
 (3,303) 2/7/2014  1998
RaceTrac Atlanta GA 
 1,025
 1,511
 
 2,536
 (470) 2/7/2014  2004
RaceTrac Bellview FL 
 684
 3,831
 
 4,515
 (1,170) 2/7/2014  2007
RaceTrac Bessemer AL 
 761
 2,624
 
 3,385
 (768) 2/7/2014  2003
RaceTrac Denton TX 
 1,030
 2,645
 
 3,675
 (742) 2/7/2014  2003
RaceTrac Houston TX 
 1,209
 1,204
 
 2,413
 (345) 2/7/2014  1995
RaceTrac Houston TX 
 1,203
 1,509
 
 2,712
 (434) 2/7/2014  1997
RaceTrac Jacksonville FL 
 1,065
 2,863
 
 3,928
 (939) 2/7/2014  2011

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Troy NC 
 341
 621
 
 962
 (100) 6/17/2014 2014
Family Dollar Fort Yates ND 
 126
 715
 
 841
 (220) 1/31/2012 2010
Family Dollar New Town ND 
 105
 942
 24
 1,071
 (291) 1/31/2012 2011
Family Dollar Rolla ND 
 83
 749
 
 832
 (231) 1/31/2012 2010
Family Dollar Madison NE 
 37
 703
 
 740
 (218) 12/30/2011 2011
Family Dollar Omaha NE 
 196
 1,334
 
 1,530
 (231) 12/19/2014 1995
Family Dollar Omaha NE 
 141
 1,159
 3
 1,303
 (190) 12/18/2014 1995
Family Dollar Rushville NE 
 125
 499
 
 624
 (132) 4/26/2013 2007
Family Dollar Lancaster NH 
 456
 1,294
 (2) 1,748
 (174) 12/12/2014 1989
Family Dollar Stratford NJ 
 378
 1,511
 (174) 1,715
 (170) 12/31/2014 2014
Family Dollar Alamorgordo NM 524
 161
 675
 
 836
 (139) 2/7/2014 2001
Family Dollar Belen NM 
 350
 
 969
 1,319
 (122) 5/29/2015 2014
Family Dollar Carrizozo NM 
 250
 
 1,113
 1,363
 (120) 3/6/2015 2014
Family Dollar Chimayo NM 
 158
 632
 (15) 775
 (174) 1/30/2013 2009
Family Dollar Cloudcroft NM 
 184
 1,344
 
 1,528
 (212) 12/18/2014 1995
Family Dollar Clovis NM 657
 119
 854
 
 973
 (184) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Gallup NM 
 221
 1,366
 
 1,587
 (307) 2/7/2014 2007
Family Dollar Hernandez NM 1,152
 140
 1,434
 
 1,574
 (321) 2/7/2014 2008
Family Dollar Logan NM 
 80
 
 1,147
 1,227
 (124) 5/29/2015 2015
Family Dollar Lovington NM 
 54
 722
 
 776
 (107) 6/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Mountainair NM 
 84
 752
 
 836
 (221) 7/16/2012 2011
Family Dollar Roswell NM 766
 140
 953
 
 1,093
 (209) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Springer NM 
 106
 
 1,199
 1,305
 (167) 2/11/2015 2014
Family Dollar Velarde NM 
 183
 
 1,122
 1,305
 (121) 2/25/2015 2015
Family Dollar Waterflow NM 
 175
 
 1,294
 1,469
 (85) 2/5/2015 2014
Family Dollar Battle Mountain NV 
 116
 1,431
 
 1,547
 (307) 2/7/2014 2009
Family Dollar Carlin NV 
 99
 895
 
 994
 (216) 9/13/2013 2012
Family Dollar Cold Springs NV 
 217
 869
 
 1,086
 (209) 9/13/2013 2013
Family Dollar Hawthorne NV 
 191
 764
 
 955
 (226) 6/1/2012 2012
Family Dollar Las Vegas NV 876
 689
 612
 
 1,301
 (153) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Lovelock NV 
 185
 742
 
 927
 (221) 5/4/2012 2012
Family Dollar Silver Spring NV 
 202
 808
 
 1,010
 (234) 9/21/2012 2012

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
RaceTrac Leesburg FL 
 1,188
 2,711
 
 3,899
 (901) 2/7/2014  2007
RaceTrac Mobile AL 
 580
 1,317
 
 1,897
 (384) 2/7/2014  1998
Kohl's Fort Dodge IA 
 1,431
 3,109
 
 4,540
 (870) 2/7/2014  2011
General Service Administration Oceanside CA 27,749
 9,489
 33,812
 105
 43,406
 (8,507) 2/7/2014  2010
Irving Oil Belfast ME 
 339
 698
 
 1,037
 (240) 2/7/2014  1997
Irving Oil Bethel ME 
 182
 331
 
 513
 (119) 2/7/2014  1990
Irving Oil Boothbay Harbor ME 
 413
 550
 
 963
 (208) 2/7/2014  1993
Irving Oil Caribou ME 
 187
 404
 
 591
 (135) 2/7/2014  1990
Irving Oil Conway NH 
 173
 525
 
 698
 (165) 2/7/2014  2004
Irving Oil Dover NH 
 380
 717
 
 1,097
 (238) 2/7/2014  1988
Irving Oil Fort Kent ME 
 358
 352
 
 710
 (147) 2/7/2014  1973
Irving Oil Kennebunk ME 
 469
 541
 
 1,010
 (203) 2/7/2014  1980
Irving Oil Lincoln ME 
 360
 360
 
 720
 (127) 2/7/2014  1994
Irving Oil Orono ME 
 228
 272
 
 500
 (92) 2/7/2014  1984
Irving Oil Rochester NH 
 290
 747
 
 1,037
 (236) 2/7/2014  1970
Irving Oil Skowhegan ME 
 541
 492
 
 1,033
 (196) 2/7/2014  1988
Irving Oil Dummerston VT 
 185
 353
 
 538
 (139) 2/7/2014  1993
Irving Oil Rutland VT 
 249
 220
 
 469
 (78) 2/7/2014  1984
Irving Oil Saco ME 
 619
 222
 
 841
 (110) 2/7/2014  1995
Irving Oil Westminster VT 
 108
 437
 
 545
 (148) 2/7/2014  1990
LA Fitness Oswego IL 
 3,163
 8,749
 
 11,912
 (2,713) 2/7/2014  2008
DaVita Dialysis Ft. Wayne IN 
 394
 2,963
 (8) 3,349
 (674) 2/7/2014  2008
Binny's Beverage Depot Joliet IL 
 1,834
 1,585
 775
 4,194
 (641) 2/7/2014  2011
Vacant Merrillville IN 
 511
 4,768
 
 5,279
 (1,451) 2/7/2014  2011
Physicians Dialysis Lawrenceville NJ 
 633
 2,757
 
 3,390
 (670) 2/7/2014  2009
The Medicines Company Parsippany NJ 27,700
 5,150
 50,051
 748
 55,949
 (12,908) 2/7/2014  2009
Dick's Sporting Goods Fort Gratiot MI 
 722
 7,743
 
 8,465
 (2,331) 2/7/2014  2010
Michaels Lafayette LA 
 1,831
 3,631
 223
 5,685
 (1,180) 2/7/2014  2011
Outback Steakhouse Fort Smith AR 
 841
 1,996
 
 2,837
 (674) 2/7/2014  1999
Outback Steakhouse Centennial CO 
 1,378
 1,397
 
 2,775
 (483) 2/7/2014  1996
Outback Steakhouse Jacksonville FL 
 770
 2,261
 
 3,031
 (683) 2/7/2014  2001
Outback Steakhouse Sebring FL 
 981
 1,695
 
 2,676
 (578) 2/7/2014  2001
Outback Steakhouse Fort Wayne IN 
 733
 984
 
 1,717
 (539) 2/7/2014  2000

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Wells NV 
 84
 755
 
 839
 (225) 5/11/2012 2011
Family Dollar Altona NY 
 94
 923
 
 1,017
 (211) 2/21/2014 2014
Family Dollar Chateaugay NY 
 133
 910
 
 1,043
 (207) 2/20/2014 2014
Family Dollar Cincinnatus NY 
 287
 862
 
 1,149
 (196) 12/30/2013 2013
Family Dollar Penn Yan NY 525
 23
 760
 
 783
 (161) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Sodus NY 
 54
 1,441
 
 1,495
 (296) 5/7/2014 2013
Family Dollar Wolcott NY 
 197
 1,193
 
 1,390
 (155) 3/25/2015 2014
Family Dollar Bethel OH 852
 139
 1,099
 
 1,238
 (243) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Canal Winchester OH 
 218
 1,116
 
 1,334
 (160) 8/28/2014 2012
Family Dollar Canton OH 460
 93
 766
 
 859
 (157) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Cincinnati OH 
 221
 1,055
 
 1,276
 (163) 8/28/2014 2001
Family Dollar Cleveland OH 1,079
 39
 1,614
 
 1,653
 (338) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Cleveland OH 1,370
 216
 1,818
 
 2,034
 (392) 2/7/2014 1994
Family Dollar Cortland OH 
 188
 963
 
 1,151
 (142) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Dayton OH 
 107
 899
 
 1,006
 (164) 8/28/2014 1940
Family Dollar Dayton OH 
 129
 618
 
 747
 (105) 8/28/2014 2002
Family Dollar Hamilton OH 
 131
 1,215
 
 1,346
 (171) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Jackson Center OH 
 97
 764
 
 861
 (115) 4/28/2014 1989
Family Dollar Loveland OH 798
 179
 986
 
 1,165
 (217) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Middleton OH 660
 137
 869
 
 1,006
 (187) 2/7/2014 2001
Family Dollar Toledo OH 
 306
 917
 
 1,223
 (251) 2/25/2013 2012
Family Dollar Toledo OH 
 226
 905
 
 1,131
 (227) 7/11/2013 1942
Family Dollar Warren OH 
 170
 681
 (2) 849
 (197) 9/11/2012 2012
Family Dollar Durant OK 
 164
 1,223
 
 1,387
 (184) 8/28/2014 2000
Family Dollar El Reno OK 
 225
 
 968
 1,193
 (155) 3/2/2015 1995
Family Dollar Geary OK 
 167
 882
 
 1,049
 (91) 10/14/2015 2015
Family Dollar Keota OK 
 279
 872
 
 1,151
 (133) 10/16/2014 2014
Family Dollar Kingston OK 
 28
 660
 
 688
 (131) 2/7/2014 2000
Family Dollar Oklahoma City OK 
 403
 
 988
 1,391
 (106) 5/15/2015 2015
Family Dollar Oklahoma City OK 
 390
 990
 
 1,380
 (144) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Porum OK 
 18
 
 995
 1,013
 (109) 11/5/2015 2015
Family Dollar Poteau OK 
 310
 
 924
 1,234
 (105) 8/7/2015 2015

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Outback Steakhouse Lexington KY 
 1,077
 2,139
 
 3,216
 (702) 2/7/2014  2002
Outback Steakhouse Baton Rouge LA 
 742
 1,272
 
 2,014
 (414) 2/7/2014  2001
Outback Steakhouse Southgate MI 
 787
 2,742
 
 3,529
 (859) 2/7/2014  1994
Outback Steakhouse Lees Summit MO 
 901
 620
 
 1,521
 (230) 2/7/2014  1999
Outback Steakhouse Las Cruces NM 
 536
 1,549
 
 2,085
 (493) 2/7/2014  2000
Outback Steakhouse Garner NC 
 1,088
 1,817
 
 2,905
 (606) 2/7/2014  2004
Outback Steakhouse Boardman Township OH 
 575
 2,742
 
 3,317
 (875) 2/7/2014  1995
Outback Steakhouse Pittsburgh PA 
 1,370
 932
 (932) 1,370
 
 2/7/2014  1995
Outback Steakhouse Conroe TX 
 959
 2,063
 
 3,022
 (607) 2/7/2014  2001
Outback Steakhouse Houston TX 
 964
 2,321
 
 3,285
 (684) 2/7/2014  1998
Outback Steakhouse McAllen TX 
 835
 443
 
 1,278
 (149) 2/7/2014  1999
Outback Steakhouse Colonial Heights VA 
 1,297
 746
 
 2,043
 (577) 2/7/2014  2000
Outback Steakhouse Newport News VA 
 600
 1,356
 
 1,956
 (710) 2/7/2014  1993
Outback Steakhouse Winchester VA 
 704
 1,310
 
 2,014
 (752) 2/7/2014  2006
Fleming's Steakhouse Englewood CO 
 1,152
 3,055
 
 4,207
 (988) 2/7/2014  2004
Bonefish Grill Lakeland FL 
 750
 1,897
 
 2,647
 (615) 2/7/2014  2003
Bonefish Grill Independence OH 
 895
 2,252
 
 3,147
 (756) 2/7/2014  2006
Outback Steakhouse Independence OH 
 901
 2,268
 
 3,169
 (611) 2/7/2014  2006
Bonefish Grill Gainesville VA 
 751
 1,325
 
 2,076
 (624) 2/7/2014  2004
Carrabba's Scottsdale AZ 
 1,350
 1,847
 
 3,197
 (449) 2/7/2014  2000
Carrabba's Louisville CO 
 1,083
 1,400
 
 2,483
 (450) 2/7/2014  2000
Carrabba's Tampa FL 
 1,650
 2,085
 
 3,735
 (689) 2/7/2014  1994
Carrabba's Duluth GA 
 836
 2,881
 
 3,717
 (927) 2/7/2014  2004
Carrabba's Bowie MD 
 1,429
 1,036
 
 2,465
 (598) 2/7/2014  2003
Carrabba's Brooklyn OH 
 1,187
 2,212
 
 3,399
 (684) 2/7/2014  2002
Carrabba's Washington Twnshp OH 
 906
 1,859
 
 2,765
 (624) 2/7/2014  2001
Carrabba's Columbia SC 
 1,159
 2,164
 
 3,323
 (684) 2/7/2014  2000
Carrabba's Johnson City TN 
 771
 2,536
 
 3,307
 (865) 2/7/2014  2003
West Marine Fort Lauderdale FL 
 4,337
 9,052
 
 13,389
 (2,355) 2/7/2014  2011
Petsmart Merced CA 
 1,729
 4,194
 
 5,923
 (1,111) 2/7/2014  1993
BevMo! Redding CA 
 1,312
 4,133
 227
 5,672
 (1,208) 2/7/2014  1989
Golden Corral Bakersfield CA 
 2,664
 2,078
 
 4,742
 (743) 2/7/2014  2011
Golden Corral San Angelo TX 
 644
 1,702
 
 2,346
 (525) 2/7/2014  2012

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Stilwell OK 
 40
 768
 
 808
 (236) 1/6/2012 2011
Family Dollar Texhoma OK 
 150
 
 912
 1,062
 (79) 4/15/2015 2015
Family Dollar Tulsa OK 
 220
 878
 
 1,098
 (258) 7/30/2012 2012
Family Dollar Broad Top PA 
 196
 954
 
 1,150
 (142) 5/30/2014 2013
Family Dollar Abbeville SC 
 146
 734
 
 880
 (116) 5/23/2014 2014
Family Dollar Columbia SC 
 429
 719
 
 1,148
 (155) 3/12/2014 2014
Family Dollar Columbia SC 
 489
 943
 
 1,432
 (114) 2/3/2015 2013
Family Dollar Estill SC 
 244
 757
 
 1,001
 (117) 6/4/2014 2014
Family Dollar Lancaster SC 
 249
 725
 
 974
 (108) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Manning SC 
 313
 960
 
 1,273
 (137) 9/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Mccormick SC 
 167
 791
 
 958
 (167) 4/30/2014 2014
Family Dollar Newberry SC 
 231
 935
 
 1,166
 (199) 3/27/2014 2013
Family Dollar North SC 
 193
 979
 
 1,172
 (120) 2/23/2015 2013
Family Dollar St. Matthews SC 
 175
 828
 
 1,003
 (119) 9/3/2014 2014
Family Dollar Woodruff SC 
 229
 1,125
 
 1,354
 (160) 8/28/2014 2010
Family Dollar Blackhawk SD 
 115
 585
 
 700
 (90) 8/6/2014 2006
Family Dollar Custer SD 
 32
 617
 
 649
 (157) 6/14/2013 1995
Family Dollar Lemmon SD 
 140
 
 1,021
 1,161
 (104) 5/1/2015 2014
Family Dollar Martin SD 
 85
 764
 
 849
 (235) 1/31/2012 2010
Family Dollar Mclaughlin SD 
 35
 
 1,092
 1,127
 (93) 5/12/2015 2015
Family Dollar Parker SD 
 117
 828
 1
 946
 (143) 10/10/2014 2014
Family Dollar Tyndall SD 
 72
 
 1,072
 1,144
 (125) 3/31/2015 2015
Family Dollar Harrison TN 
 74
 420
 
 494
 (105) 7/23/2013 2006
Family Dollar Lexington TN 
 323
 838
 
 1,161
 (123) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Memphis TN 
 248
 1,039
 
 1,287
 (220) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Memphis TN 638
 215
 811
 
 1,026
 (171) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Memphis TN 1,251
 376
 1,508
 
 1,884
 (327) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Memphis TN 973
 336
 1,156
 
 1,492
 (248) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Nashville TN 
 334
 1,275
 
 1,609
 (200) 8/28/2014 1976
Family Dollar Piney Flats TN 
 200
 953
 
 1,153
 (139) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Alton TX 
 134
 908
 
 1,042
 (131) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Arlington TX 
 300
 
 1,058
 1,358
 (101) 12/4/2015 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Golden Corral Spring TX 
 3,342
 1,207
 
 4,549
 (466) 2/7/2014  2011
CVS Eden NC 
 836
 1,450
 
 2,286
 (436) 2/7/2014  1998
CVS Greenville SC 
 1,108
 1,816
 
 2,924
 (562) 2/7/2014  1998
CVS Piedmont SC 
 836
 1,206
 
 2,042
 (344) 2/7/2014  1998
CVS Anderson SC 
 623
 1,389
 
 2,012
 (402) 2/7/2014  1998
Tractor Supply Columbia SC 
 952
 2,222
 
 3,174
 (526) 2/7/2014  2011
MotoMart St. Charles MO 
 1,085
 1,980
 
 3,065
 (655) 2/7/2014  2009
CVS Kernersville NC 
 960
 1,313
 
 2,273
 (392) 2/7/2014  1998
Goodyear Corpus Christi TX 
 753
 1,737
 
 2,490
 (473) 2/7/2014  2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts Willard OH 
 137
 877
 
 1,014
 (242) 2/7/2014  2011
LA Fitness Easton PA 
 938
 10,600
 139
 11,677
 (3,117) 2/7/2014  1979
Lowe's Burlington IA 
 2,775
 8,191
 819
 11,785
 (2,207) 2/7/2014  1996
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jemison AL 757
 143
 997
 
 1,140
 (301) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Montgomery AL 959
 533
 936
 
 1,469
 (288) 2/7/2014  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar El Dorado AR 663
 49
 1,003
 
 1,052
 (283) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jacksonville AR 571
 155
 758
 
 913
 (215) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Apopka FL 1,127
 518
 1,402
 
 1,920
 (394) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bristol FL 631
 202
 727
 
 929
 (231) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gainesville FL 1,002
 423
 1,263
 (16) 1,670
 (356) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Okeechobee FL 894
 655
 580
 
 1,235
 (203) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pensacola FL 559
 146
 907
 
 1,053
 (244) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tampa FL 1,005
 531
 1,062
 
 1,593
 (317) 2/7/2014  2008
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Macon GA 673
 230
 851
 
 1,081
 (256) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Homedale ID 973
 59
 1,387
 
 1,446
 (414) 2/7/2014  2006
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Alexandria LA 458
 168
 579
 
 747
 (173) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kentwood LA 683
 117
 877
 
 994
 (268) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lynn MA 1,222
 400
 1,547
 
 1,947
 (449) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Berkeley MO 969
 179
 1,391
 
 1,570
 (394) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St Louis MO 972
 215
 1,357
 
 1,572
 (389) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Las Vegas NV 876
 689
 612
 
 1,301
 (215) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Penn Yan NY 525
 23
 760
 
 783
 (223) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 886
 297
 1,081
 
 1,378
 (312) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lufkin TX 1,153
 198
 1,600
 
 1,798
 (459) 2/7/2014  2004

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Arlington TX 
 425
 
 1,112
 1,537
 (46) 2/13/2015 2014
Family Dollar Avinger TX 
 40
 761
 
 801
 (218) 10/22/2012 2012
Family Dollar Balch Springs TX 
 318
 
 1,209
 1,527
 (110) 4/10/2015 2015
Family Dollar Beaumont TX 
 215
 1,511
 
 1,726
 (290) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Beaumont TX 
 235
 810
 
 1,045
 (170) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Beaumont TX 654
 225
 806
 
 1,031
 (168) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Blooming Grove TX 
 70
 753
 
 823
 (111) 8/28/2014 2014
Family Dollar Brazoria TX 
 216
 966
 
 1,182
 (201) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Broaddus TX 
 75
 
 922
 997
 (139) 2/6/2015 1995
Family Dollar Caldwell TX 
 138
 552
 22
 712
 (165) 5/29/2012 2012
Family Dollar Centerville TX 
 226
 679
 
 905
 (164) 9/10/2013 2013
Family Dollar Chireno TX 
 50
 943
 
 993
 (266) 12/10/2012 2012
Family Dollar Clarendon TX 
 83
 749
 
 832
 (181) 9/17/2013 2013
Family Dollar Cockrell Hill TX 970
 369
 1,156
 
 1,525
 (245) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Converse TX 409
 148
 469
 
 617
 (101) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Dallas TX 627
 292
 676
 
 968
 (149) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Dickinson TX 681
 182
 876
 
 1,058
 (185) 2/7/2014 2010
Family Dollar Donna TX 
 194
 855
 
 1,049
 (127) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Eagle Lake TX 
 100
 566
 100
 766
 (170) 7/6/2012 2012
Family Dollar Etoile TX 
 45
 850
 
 895
 (209) 8/6/2013 2013
Family Dollar Floydada TX 
 36
 681
 
 717
 (211) 12/30/2011 2010
Family Dollar Fort Worth TX 
 276
 935
 
 1,211
 (97) 8/21/2015 1995
Family Dollar Fort Worth TX 
 350
 
 1,015
 1,365
 (81) 11/3/2014 2015
Family Dollar Houston TX 
 174
 696
 
 870
 (184) 4/26/2013 1995
Family Dollar Houston TX 886
 297
 1,081
 
 1,378
 (226) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Houston TX 
 565
 1,223
 
 1,788
 (260) 2/7/2014 2009
Family Dollar Houston TX 
 138
 1,052
 
 1,190
 (218) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Houston TX 
 128
 769
 
 897
 (148) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Houston TX 911
 277
 1,144
 
 1,421
 (238) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Houston TX 920
 1,355
 95
 
 1,450
 (35) 2/7/2014 1981
Family Dollar Industry TX 
 190
 
 902
 1,092
 (110) 1/5/2015 2014
Family Dollar Jacksonville TX 
 195
 1,003
 
 1,198
 (221) 3/21/2014 2014

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar McAllen TX 857
 219
 1,093
 
 1,312
 (318) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Robstown TX 550
 44
 852
 
 896
 (239) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Royse City TX 972
 411
 1,078
 
 1,489
 (317) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Angelo TX 891
 232
 1,118
 
 1,350
 (330) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Antonio TX 800
 198
 1,018
 
 1,216
 (297) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Antonio TX 864
 299
 1,039
 
 1,338
 (302) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Antonio TX 598
 260
 653
 
 913
 (194) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tyler TX 416
 132
 554
 
 686
 (162) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Waco TX 440
 125
 544
 
 669
 (161) 2/7/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Beaver UT 646
 107
 913
 
 1,020
 (270) 2/7/2014  2007
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Petersburg VA 948
 142
 1,209
 
 1,351
 (371) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Milwaukee WI 970
 161
 1,397
 
 1,558
 (399) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bethel OH 852
 139
 1,099
 
 1,238
 (337) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cleveland OH 1,079
 39
 1,614
 
 1,653
 (467) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hot Springs AR 
 247
 845
 
 1,092
 (249) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Casa Grande AZ 
 454
 313
 
 767
 (108) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Mohave AZ 
 302
 571
 
 873
 (182) 2/7/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Guadalupe AZ 
 400
 584
 
 984
 (186) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mohave Valley AZ 
 302
 281
 
 583
 (98) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 1,109
 767
 
 1,876
 (250) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Altha FL 
 126
 727
 
 853
 (227) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ocala FL 
 344
 1,251
 
 1,595
 (350) 2/7/2014  2006
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ormond Beach FL 
 675
 1,152
 
 1,827
 (327) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Plant City FL 
 279
 1,040
 
 1,319
 (293) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tallahassee FL 970
 632
 871
 
 1,503
 (275) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Seymour IN 
 238
 764
 
 1,002
 (233) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Topeka KS 
 177
 1,405
 
 1,582
 (421) 2/7/2014  2004
DNU Baton Rouge LA 
 377
 716
 
 1,093
 (222) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Brooklyn MI 
 150
 634
 
 784
 (196) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Saginaw MI 
 164
 1,086
 
 1,250
 (335) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St Louis MO 
 258
 1,310
 
 1,568
 (375) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Greenville MS 
 125
 872
 
 997
 (264) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gulfport MS 
 312
 1,237
 
 1,549
 (373) 2/7/2014  2007

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar Kerens TX 
 73
 658
 
 731
 (201) 2/29/2012 2011
Family Dollar La Pryor TX 
 74
 817
 
 891
 (119) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Leander TX 557
 355
 489
 
 844
 (108) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Lovelady TX 
 82
 740
 
 822
 (199) 3/27/2013 1995
Family Dollar Lufkin TX 1,153
 198
 1,600
 
 1,798
 (331) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Marshall TX 
 85
 662
 
 747
 (144) 2/7/2014 2001
Family Dollar Mcallen TX 
 445
 896
 
 1,341
 (130) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Mcallen TX 857
 219
 1,093
 
 1,312
 (230) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Mesquite TX 
 426
 
 1,146
 1,572
 (129) 5/29/2015 1995
Family Dollar Mesquite TX 
 1,414
 
 (8) 1,406
 (117) 9/1/2015 2015
Family Dollar Mesquite TX 
 1,460
 
 (184) 1,276
 (121) 7/9/2015 2015
Family Dollar Mexia TX 
 112
 495
 
 607
 (109) 2/7/2014 2000
Family Dollar Noonday TX 625
 103
 895
 
 998
 (188) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Oakhurst TX 
 36
 683
 
 719
 (193) 12/12/2012 2012
Family Dollar Oakwood TX 
 133
 752
 
 885
 (174) 11/20/2013 2013
Family Dollar Ore City TX 
 27
 744
 
 771
 (109) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Palestine TX 671
 120
 914
 
 1,034
 (195) 2/7/2014 2000
Family Dollar Pharr TX 969
 219
 1,253
 
 1,472
 (264) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Plano TX 
 468
 869
 
 1,337
 (214) 8/1/2013 2013
Family Dollar Port Arthur TX 1,044
 178
 1,452
 
 1,630
 (299) 2/7/2014 2005
Family Dollar Raymondville TX 542
 117
 707
 
 824
 (149) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Refugio TX 
 110
 982
 
 1,092
 (141) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Rio Grande TX 
 133
 1,284
 
 1,417
 (269) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Robstown TX 550
 44
 852
 
 896
 (172) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Royse City TX 972
 411
 1,078
 
 1,489
 (229) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar Sabinal TX 
 35
 952
 
 987
 (136) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar San Angelo TX 891
 232
 1,118
 
 1,350
 (238) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar San Antonio TX 800
 198
 1,018
 
 1,216
 (215) 2/7/2014 2002
Family Dollar San Antonio TX 864
 299
 1,039
 
 1,338
 (218) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar San Antonio TX 598
 260
 653
 
 913
 (140) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar San Antonio TX 506
 211
 567
 
 778
 (121) 2/7/2014 2004
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Gallup NM 
 221
 1,366
 
 1,587
 (423) 2/7/2014  2007
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Battle Mountain NV 
 116
 1,431
 
 1,547
 (426) 2/7/2014  2009
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kingston OK 
 28
 660
 
 688
 (182) 2/7/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Memphis TN ��
 248
 1,039
 
 1,287
 (305) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Beaumont TX 
 215
 1,511
 
 1,726
 (404) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Beaumont TX 
 235
 810
 
 1,045
 (236) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Brazoria TX 
 216
 966
 
 1,182
 (278) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 
 565
 1,223
 
 1,788
 (361) 2/7/2014  2009
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 
 138
 1,052
 
 1,190
 (301) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 
 128
 769
 
 897
 (207) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Marshall TX 
 85
 662
 
 747
 (201) 2/7/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mexia TX 
 112
 495
 
 607
 (152) 2/7/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Rio Grande TX 
 133
 1,284
 
 1,417
 (371) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Victoria TX 
 441
 144
 
 585
 (53) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Green Bay WI 
 304
 1,072
 
 1,376
 (320) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Little Rock AR 
 125
 629
 
 754
 (178) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Avondale AZ 
 603
 882
 
 1,485
 (272) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Coolidge AZ 
 126
 785
 
 911
 (236) 2/7/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 504
 1,079
 
 1,583
 (328) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Dacano CO 
 155
 959
 
 1,114
 (294) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Lupton CO 
 154
 1,180
 
 1,334
 (358) 2/7/2014  1961
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pembroke Park FL 
 656
 944
 
 1,600
 (309) 2/7/2014  2006
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Myers FL 
 189
 1,344
 
 1,533
 (389) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lakeland FL 
 339
 785
 
 1,124
 (239) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jacksonville FL 
 271
 1,121
 
 1,392
 (309) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Plant City FL 
 712
 1,113
 
 1,825
 (339) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Milton FL 
 544
 683
 
 1,227
 (184) 2/7/2014  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ocala FL 
 554
 984
 
 1,538
 (294) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Deland FL 
 492
 1,293
 
 1,785
 (370) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jacksonville FL 
 545
 1,173
 
 1,718
 (337) 2/7/2014  2008
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tampa FL 
 773
 1,057
 
 1,830
 (321) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Dodge IA 
 152
 449
 (17) 584
 (145) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kansas CIty KS 
 154
 1,367
 
 1,521
 (397) 2/7/2014  2002

F-144



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hudson MI 
 108
 1,020
 
 1,128
 (325) 2/7/2014  2005
DNU Burton MI 
 131
 1,164
 
 1,295
 (349) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Newaygo MI 
 317
 677
 
 994
 (218) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kentwood MI 
 389
 919
 
 1,308
 (254) 2/7/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St. Peter MN 
 93
 566
 
 659
 (162) 2/7/2014  1960
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kansas CIty MO 
 277
 812
 
 1,089
 (238) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hernandez NM 
 140
 1,434
 
 1,574
 (443) 2/7/2014  2008
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Canton OH 
 93
 766
 
 859
 (223) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Memphis TN 
 215
 811
 
 1,026
 (239) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Port Arthur TX 
 178
 1,452
 
 1,630
 (414) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Converse TX 
 148
 469
 
 617
 (141) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Leander TX 
 355
 489
 
 844
 (150) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Beaumont TX 
 225
 806
 
 1,031
 (233) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 
 277
 1,144
 
 1,421
 (329) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Noonday TX 
 103
 895
 
 998
 (261) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Antonio TX 
 211
 567
 
 778
 (168) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Antonio TX 
 214
 911
 
 1,125
 (265) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Deltona FL 686
 171
 1,074
 
 1,245
 (292) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Deltona FL 1,042
 206
 1,578
 
 1,784
 (441) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Meade FL 417
 211
 606
 
 817
 (161) 2/7/2014  2000
Dollar General Kissimmee FL 
 643
 1,071
 
 1,714
 (299) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lake City FL 622
 186
 872
 
 1,058
 (249) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St Petersburg FL 1,093
 690
 1,000
 
 1,690
 (309) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Des Moines IA 822
 411
 871
 
 1,282
 (266) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Indianapolis IN 613
 375
 707
 
 1,082
 (195) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Princeton IN 526
 300
 486
 
 786
 (151) 2/7/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Terre Haute IN 394
 235
 427
 
 662
 (129) 2/7/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Abbeville LA 740
 141
 949
 
 1,090
 (290) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Farmerville LA 722
 110
 968
 
 1,078
 (290) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar New Orleans LA 1,146
 547
 1,252
 
 1,799
 (372) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Shreveport LA 892
 177
 1,177
 
 1,354
 (349) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pontiac MI 962
 136
 1,249
 
 1,385
 (381) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kansas CIty MO 1,211
 119
 1,705
 
 1,824
 (505) 2/7/2014  2004

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Family Dollar San Antonio TX 728
 214
 911
 
 1,125
 (191) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar San Antonio TX 1,143
 117
 1,619
 
 1,736
 (338) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar San Benito TX 598
 132
 772
 
 904
 (164) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar San Diego TX 602
 55
 855
 
 910
 (180) 2/7/2014 2004
Family Dollar Seadrift TX 
 51
 832
 
 883
 (121) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Somerville TX 
 131
 743
 
 874
 (209) 12/31/2012 1995
Family Dollar Sonora TX 
 49
 548
 
 597
 (96) 8/28/2014 2001
Family Dollar Tyler TX 416
 132
 554
 
 686
 (116) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Victoria TX 
 441
 144
 
 585
 (38) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Waco TX 440
 125
 544
 
 669
 (116) 2/7/2014 2001
Family Dollar Weatherford TX 
 218
 1,057
 (5) 1,270
 (174) 10/10/2014 2014
Family Dollar Beaver UT 646
 107
 913
 
 1,020
 (194) 2/7/2014 2007
Family Dollar Bristol VA 608
 104
 837
 
 941
 (186) 2/7/2014 1978
Family Dollar Gretna VA 
 131
 744
 
 875
 (186) 7/2/2013 2012
Family Dollar Hopewell VA 
 430
 987
 
 1,417
 (222) 2/26/2014 2014
Family Dollar Petersburg VA 948
 142
 1,209
 
 1,351
 (269) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Stuart VA 
 204
 750
 
 954
 (82) 4/18/2014 2013
Family Dollar Wirtz VA 
 148
 919
 
 1,067
 (134) 8/28/2014 2013
Family Dollar Green Bay WI 
 304
 1,072
 
 1,376
 (230) 2/7/2014 2011
Family Dollar Markesan WI 
 92
 831
 
 923
 (189) 12/12/2013 2013
Family Dollar Mayville WI 
 128
 1,023
 
 1,151
 (228) 2/26/2014 2014
Family Dollar Milwaukee WI 970
 161
 1,397
 
 1,558
 (288) 2/7/2014 2003
Family Dollar Thorp WI 
 90
 810
 
 900
 (199) 8/30/2013 2013
Family Dollar Webster WI 
 43
 808
 
 851
 (202) 7/11/2013 2013
Family Dollar Alderson WV 
 166
 663
 
 829
 (166) 7/11/2013 2012
Family Dollar Kemmerer WY 
 45
 853
 
 898
 (234) 2/22/2013 2013
Family Dollar Mountain View WY 
 44
 838
 
 882
 (202) 9/13/2013 2013
Family Dollar Torrington WY 
 72
 645
 
 717
 (167) 5/9/2013 1995
Family Fare Supermarket Battle Creek MI 
 1,393
 7,950
 
 9,343
 (1,716) 2/7/2014 2010
Farmers Insurance Mercer Island WA 
 24,285
 28,210
 
 52,495
 (5,714) 11/5/2013 1982
Fazoli's Carmel IN 
 427
 522
 
 949
 (123) 7/31/2013 1986
FedEx Homewood AL 
 522
 779
 
 1,301
 (199) 6/27/2013 2000

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kansas CIty MO 970
 142
 1,338
 
 1,480
 (393) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Alamorgordo NM 524
 161
 675
 
 836
 (193) 2/7/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Clovis NM 657
 119
 854
 
 973
 (254) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Roswell NM 766
 140
 953
 
 1,093
 (289) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cleveland OH 1,370
 216
 1,818
 
 2,034
 (542) 2/7/2014  1994
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Loveland OH 798
 179
 986
 
 1,165
 (301) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Middleton OH 660
 137
 869
 
 1,006
 (259) 2/7/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Memphis TN 1,251
 376
 1,508
 
 1,884
 (452) 2/7/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Memphis TN 973
 336
 1,156
 
 1,492
 (343) 2/7/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cockrell Hill TX 970
 369
 1,156
 
 1,525
 (340) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Dallas TX 627
 292
 676
 
 968
 (208) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Dickinson TX 681
 182
 876
 
 1,058
 (257) 2/7/2014  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Houston TX 920
 1,355
 95
 
 1,450
 (48) 2/7/2014  1981
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Palestine TX 671
 120
 914
 
 1,034
 (270) 2/7/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pharr TX 969
 219
 1,253
 
 1,472
 (364) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Raymondville TX 542
 117
 707
 
 824
 (207) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Antonio TX 1,143
 117
 1,619
 
 1,736
 (467) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Benito TX 598
 132
 772
 
 904
 (226) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar San Diego TX 602
 55
 855
 
 910
 (249) 2/7/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bristol VA 608
 104
 837
 
 941
 (259) 2/7/2014  1978
West Marine Harrison Township MI 
 452
 2,092
 
 2,544
 (741) 2/7/2014  2009
Amazon Chattanooga TN 40,800
 1,995
 54,332
 
 56,327
 (14,526) 2/7/2014  2011
Advance Auto Parts Georgetown KY 
 510
 1,323
 
 1,833
 (350) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Frankfort KY 
 833
 1,034
 
 1,867
 (282) 2/7/2014  2007
Golden Corral Akron OH 
 640
 2,133
 
 2,773
 (617) 2/7/2014  2003
Golden Corral Canton OH 
 647
 2,135
 
 2,782
 (651) 2/7/2014  2002
Golden Corral Cincinnati OH 
 694
 2,066
 (20) 2,740
 (623) 2/7/2014  1999
Golden Corral Clarksville IN 
 1,061
 1,344
 
 2,405
 (542) 2/7/2014  2002
Golden Corral Cleveland OH 
 1,109
 2,315
 
 3,424
 (653) 2/7/2014  2004
Golden Corral Beavercreek OH 
 713
 1,858
 
 2,571
 (521) 2/7/2014  2000
Golden Corral Dayton OH 
 579
 1,429
 
 2,008
 (436) 2/7/2014  2000
Golden Corral Dayton OH 
 774
 2,766
 
 3,540
 (816) 2/7/2014  2002
Golden Corral Elyria OH 
 1,167
 1,599
 
 2,766
 (463) 2/7/2014  2004

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
FedEx Tempe AZ 
 2,914
 12,300
 133
 15,347
 (2,202) 6/25/2014 2004
FedEx Yuma AZ 
 
 2,076
 
 2,076
 (658) 10/17/2012 2011
FedEx Chico CA 
 308
 2,776
 123
 3,207
 (861) 11/9/2012 2006
FedEx Commerce City CO 
 6,556
 26,224
 393
 33,173
 (8,779) 3/20/2012 2007
FedEx Melbourne FL 
 159
 1,433
 
 1,592
 (390) 7/26/2013 2001
FedEx Des Moines IA 
 733
 1,361
 183
 2,277
 (403) 4/18/2013 1986
FedEx Ottumwa IA 
 205
 2,552
 2,749
 5,506
 (1,019) 10/30/2012 2012
FedEx Waterloo IA 
 152
 2,882
 
 3,034
 (842) 3/22/2013 2006
FedEx Effingham IL 6,811
 1,875
 14,827
 
 16,702
 (2,715) 2/7/2014 2008
FedEx Kankakee IL 
 195
 1,103
 176
 1,474
 (377) 5/31/2012 2003
FedEx Quincy IL 
 371
 2,101
 3,011
 5,483
 (934) 9/28/2012 2012
FedEx Evansville IN 
 665
 2,661
 
 3,326
 (873) 5/31/2012 1998
FedEx Kokomo IN 
 186
 3,541
 3,442
 7,169
 (1,367) 3/16/2012 2012
FedEx Lafayette IN 2,157
 768
 4,128
 
 4,896
 (734) 2/7/2014 2008
FedEx Independence KS 
 114
 2,166
 
 2,280
 (677) 10/30/2012 2012
FedEx Hazard KY 
 215
 4,085
 
 4,300
 (1,290) 9/28/2012 2012
FedEx London KY 
 350
 3,151
 
 3,501
 (809) 10/11/2013 2013
FedEx Bossier City LA 
 295
 6,223
 
 6,518
 (1,198) 2/7/2014 2009
FedEx Grand Rapids MI 
 1,797
 7,189
 
 8,986
 (2,337) 6/14/2012 2012
FedEx Port Huron MI 
 125
 1,121
 
 1,246
 (316) 5/31/2013 2003
FedEx Roseville MN 
 1,462
 8,282
 
 9,744
 (2,564) 11/30/2012 2012
FedEx Mccomb MS 
 548
 3,268
 2,212
 6,028
 (736) 2/7/2014 2008
FedEx Butte MT 
 403
 7,653
 2,763
 10,819
 (2,899) 9/27/2011 2001
FedEx Greenville NC 
 363
 6,903
 
 7,266
 (2,329) 2/22/2012 2006
FedEx Belmont NH 
 265
 2,386
 
 2,651
 (820) 12/29/2011 1991
FedEx Wendover NV 
 262
 1,483
 
 1,745
 (441) 2/25/2013 2012
FedEx Blauvelt NY 26,100
 14,420
 26,779
 
 41,199
 (8,870) 4/5/2012 2012
FedEx Marcy NY 
 339
 5,795
 
 6,134
 (1,496) 9/5/2014 2006
FedEx Plattsburg NY 2,614
 801
 3,982
 
 4,783
 (830) 2/7/2014 2008
FedEx Lebanon OH 
 1,492
 8,452
 
 9,944
 (2,381) 8/26/2013 2013
FedEx Northwood OH 2,410
 674
 5,497
 486
 6,657
 (995) 2/7/2014 1998
FedEx Tulsa OK 
 458
 8,695
 
 9,153
 (2,934) 2/22/2012 2008

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Golden Corral Fairfield OH 
 859
 1,135
 
 1,994
 (341) 2/7/2014  1999
Golden Corral Grove City OH 
 926
 1,859
 
 2,785
 (542) 2/7/2014  2007
Golden Corral Louisville KY 
 1,020
 1,173
 
 2,193
 (384) 2/7/2014  2001
Golden Corral Monroeville PA 
 1,647
 849
 
 2,496
 (191) 2/7/2014  1982
Golden Corral Northfield OH 
 947
 1,061
 
 2,008
 (304) 2/7/2014  2004
Golden Corral Ontario OH 
 616
 2,412
 
 3,028
 (726) 2/7/2014  2004
Golden Corral Richmond IN 
 728
 723
 
 1,451
 (258) 2/7/2014  2002
Golden Corral Springfield OH 
 619
 1,142
 
 1,761
 (325) 2/7/2014  2000
Golden Corral Toledo OH 
 838
 3,333
 
 4,171
 (934) 2/7/2014  2004
Goodyear Columbia SC 
 656
 2,077
 
 2,733
 (575) 2/7/2014  2010
Goodyear Cumming GA 
 534
 2,516
 
 3,050
 (685) 2/7/2014  2010
Goodyear Cumming GA 
 1,085
 1,915
 (11) 2,989
 (551) 2/7/2014  2010
AutoZone Hernando MS 
 141
 833
 53
 1,027
 (216) 2/7/2014  2003
CVS Oklahoma City OK 
 569
 1,609
 
 2,178
 (458) 2/7/2014  1996
Advance Auto Parts Dayton OH 
 470
 1,349
 
 1,819
 (384) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Florence KY 
 550
 1,280
 
 1,830
 (364) 2/7/2014  2008
Advance Auto Parts Mishawaka IN 
 429
 1,373
 
 1,802
 (382) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Richmond IN 
 377
 1,616
 
 1,993
 (442) 2/7/2014  2007
Advance Auto Parts Spring TX 
 388
 1,616
 
 2,004
 (408) 2/7/2014  2007
Ulta Beauty Fort Gratiot MI 
 164
 2,083
 
 2,247
 (558) 2/7/2014  2012
Pier 1 Imports Victoria TX 
 457
 1,767
 
 2,224
 (521) 2/7/2014  2011
Tractor Supply Middletown DE 
 1,487
 3,293
 
 4,780
 (784) 2/7/2014  2007
O'Reilly Auto Parts Louisville KY 
 573
 794
 
 1,367
 (234) 2/7/2014  2011
Trader Joe's Lexington KY 
 2,287
 3,795
 
 6,082
 (1,128) 2/7/2014  2012
Mattress Firm Fairview Heights IL 
 231
 958
 
 1,189
 (305) 2/7/2014  1977
RSA Security Bedford MA 
 16,594
 75,137
 1,217
 92,948
 (19,572) 2/7/2014  2001
Sysmex Lincolnshire IL 22,500
 4,143
 36,987
 
 41,130
 (10,057) 2/7/2014  2010
Benihana Maple Grove MN 
 1,319
 2,604
 
 3,923
 (866) 2/7/2014  2006
Benihana Farmington Hills MI 
 2,025
 2,049
 
 4,074
 (783) 2/7/2014  2012
Benihana Anchorage AK 
 1,391
 1,877
 
 3,268
 (629) 2/7/2014  1998
Benihana Dallas TX 
 2,988
 1,275
 
 4,263
 (502) 2/7/2014  1975
Benihana Miami Beach FL 
 3,775
 433
 3,367
 7,575
 
 2/7/2014  1972
Benihana Stuart FL 
 1,661
 1,917
 
 3,578
 (664) 2/7/2014  1976

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
FedEx Tulsa OK 
 1,476
 18,054
 555
 20,085
 (4,470) 3/31/2014 1999
FedEx Tinicum PA 
 
 32,180
 549
 32,729
 (8,669) 8/15/2013 2013
FedEx Rapid City SD 
 305
 2,741
 4,584
 7,630
 (1,162) 5/8/2015 2007
FedEx Blountville TN 
 562
 5,056
 
 5,618
 (1,706) 2/3/2012 2009
FedEx Humboldt TN 
 239
 4,543
 
 4,782
 (1,463) 7/11/2012 2008
FedEx Bryan TX 
 1,422
 4,763
 41
 6,226
 (1,203) 6/15/2012 1995
FedEx Omak WA 
 252
 1,425
 
 1,677
 (450) 9/27/2012 2012
FedEx Wenatchee WA 
 266
 2,393
 
 2,659
 (756) 9/27/2012 1995
FedEx Menomonee Falls WI 
 4,215
 14,555
 
 18,770
 (1,315) 2/18/2016 2015
FedEx Parkersburg WV 
 193
 3,671
 
 3,864
 (1,159) 9/20/2012 2012
Fire Mountain Buffet Summerville SC 
 245
 1,308
 (1,241) 312
 (47) 1/8/2014 1997
Fire Mountain Buffet Charleston WV 
 243
 1,305
 (1,228) 320
 (58) 1/8/2014 2000
First Bank Pinellas Park FL 
 630
 1,470
 4
 2,104
 (332) 10/1/2013 1980
Fleming's Steakhouse Englewood CO 
 1,152
 3,055
 
 4,207
 (719) 2/7/2014 2004
Flint Energy Technologies Rhome TX 
 284
 1,752
 
 2,036
 (283) 9/19/2014 2014
Floor & Decor Mcdonough GA 
 1,859
 7,711
 
 9,570
 (248) 12/13/2016 2015
Folsom Gateway II Folsom CA 21,600
 10,314
 27,983
 141
 38,438
 (5,477) 2/7/2014 2006
Food Lion Moyock NC 
 1,269
 2,950
 
 4,219
 (690) 2/7/2014 1999
Forum Energy Technology Guthrie OK 
 393
 1,305
 
 1,698
 (219) 6/25/2014 1979
Forum Energy Technology Gainesville TX 
 123
 6,019
 
 6,142
 (973) 6/25/2014 2008
Fresenius Medical Care Fairhope AL 
 
 2,035
 
 2,035
 (426) 7/8/2013 2006
Fresenius Medical Care Foley AL 
 287
 2,580
 
 2,867
 (541) 7/8/2013 2009
Fresenius Medical Care Mobile AL 
 278
 2,505
 
 2,783
 (525) 7/8/2013 2009
Fresenius Medical Care Defuniak Springs FL 
 115
 2,180
 
 2,295
 (457) 7/8/2013 2008
Fresenius Medical Care Aurora IL 2,294
 287
 2,584
 15
 2,886
 (642) 7/13/2012 1996
Fresenius Medical Care Chicago IL 
 588
 1,764
 
 2,352
 (438) 7/31/2012 1960
Fresenius Medical Care Waukegan IL 
 94
 1,792
 61
 1,947
 (453) 7/31/2012 1980
Fresenius Medical Care Peru IN 
 69
 1,305
 
 1,374
 (327) 6/27/2012 1982
Fresenius Medical Care Bossier City LA 
 120
 682
 
 802
 (159) 1/30/2013 2008
Fresenius Medical Care Caro MI 
 92
 1,744
 
 1,836
 (437) 6/5/2012 1995
Fresenius Medical Care Jackson MI 1,948
 137
 2,603
 
 2,740
 (653) 6/5/2012 1995
Fresenius Medical Care Albemarle NC 
 139
 1,253
 
 1,392
 (277) 4/30/2013 2008

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Benihana Schaumburg IL 
 2,319
 1,396
 
 3,715
 (500) 2/7/2014  1992
Benihana Alpharetta GA 
 1,151
 1,485
 
 2,636
 (269) 2/7/2014  2003
Benihana Wheeling IL 
 1,896
 1,273
 
 3,169
 (310) 2/7/2014  2001
Trader Joe's Sarasota FL 
 1,646
 5,416
 
 7,062
 (1,540) 2/7/2014  2012
US Bank Fayetteville NC 
 608
 1,741
 
 2,349
 (454) 2/7/2014  2012
Advance Auto Parts Candler NC 
 399
 1,202
 
 1,601
 (333) 2/7/2014  2012
JOANN Shakopee MN 
 994
 1,807
 
 2,801
 (500) 2/7/2014  2012
Stripes Brady TX 
 203
 3,205
 
 3,408
 (965) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Brownsville TX 
 613
 3,195
 
 3,808
 (984) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Corpus Christi TX 
 681
 2,047
 
 2,728
 (645) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Corpus Christi TX 
 1,011
 3,125
 
 4,136
 (970) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Corpus Christi TX 
 803
 3,109
 
 3,912
 (965) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Edinburg TX 
 488
 2,499
 
 2,987
 (834) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Edinburg TX 
 450
 2,818
 
 3,268
 (792) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Houston TX 
 1,204
 2,069
 
 3,273
 (634) 2/7/2014  2007
Stripes Midland TX 
 1,098
 4,857
 
 5,955
 (1,485) 2/7/2014  2006
Stripes Mission TX 
 1,007
 3,178
 (33) 4,152
 (920) 2/7/2014  2003
Stripes Odessa TX 
 803
 3,596
 
 4,399
 (1,565) 2/7/2014  1998
Stripes San Angelo TX 
 772
 4,025
 
 4,797
 (1,231) 2/7/2014  1997
Stripes San Angelo TX 
 1,006
 3,277
 
 4,283
 (1,017) 2/7/2014  2007
Vacant Melbourne FL 
 405
 1,237
 (942) 700
 
 2/7/2014  2011
Road Ranger Winnebago IL 
 707
 3,202
 
 3,909
 (983) 2/7/2014  1998
Urban Air Adventure Park Coral Springs FL 
 4,264
 5,289
 200
 9,753
 (1,467) 2/7/2014  2010
WaWa Gap PA 
 561
 5,054
 (17) 5,598
 (1,451) 2/7/2014  2004
Best Buy Chesterfield MO 
 1,537
 4,123
 
 5,660
 (1,262) 2/7/2014  2012
Cost Plus World Market La Quinta CA 
 1,211
 4,786
 
 5,997
 (1,388) 2/7/2014  2007
Sprouts Centennial CO 
 1,581
 6,394
 
 7,975
 (1,946) 2/7/2014  2009
Tractor Supply Tuscaloosa AL 
 746
 1,979
 
 2,725
 (485) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Phenix City AL 
 267
 929
 
 1,196
 (279) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Lyerly GA 
 251
 992
 
 1,243
 (297) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Grambling LA 
 597
 719
 
 1,316
 (230) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Lake Charles LA 
 406
 770
 
 1,176
 (237) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Lowell OH 
 157
 1,114
 
 1,271
 (325) 2/7/2014  2012

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Fresenius Medical Care Angiers NC 
 203
 1,152
 
 1,355
 (255) 4/30/2013 2012
Fresenius Medical Care Asheboro NC 2,373
 323
 2,903
 
 3,226
 (642) 4/30/2013 2012
Fresenius Medical Care Clinton NC 
 139
 2,655
 3
 2,797
 (566) 6/28/2013 1995
Fresenius Medical Care Fairmont NC 
 201
 1,819
 6
 2,026
 (387) 6/28/2013 2002
Fresenius Medical Care Fayetteville NC 
 420
 2,379
 
 2,799
 (508) 6/28/2013 1995
Fresenius Medical Care Fayetteville NC 
 134
 2,551
 
 2,685
 (545) 6/28/2013 2004
Fresenius Medical Care Fayetteville NC 
 178
 3,379
 
 3,557
 (721) 6/28/2013 1999
Fresenius Medical Care Lumberton NC 
 117
 2,216
 
 2,333
 (473) 6/28/2013 1986
Fresenius Medical Care Pembroke NC 
 81
 1,547
 
 1,628
 (330) 6/28/2013 2009
Fresenius Medical Care Red Springs NC 
 101
 1,913
 
 2,014
 (408) 6/28/2013 2000
Fresenius Medical Care Roseboro NC 
 74
 1,404
 
 1,478
 (300) 6/28/2013 2010
Fresenius Medical Care St. Pauls NC 
 73
 1,389
 
 1,462
 (296) 6/28/2013 2008
Fresenius Medical Care Taylorsville NC 
 275
 1,099
 
 1,374
 (243) 4/30/2013 2011
Fresenius Medical Care Warsaw NC 
 75
 1,428
 
 1,503
 (341) 11/13/2012 2003
Fresenius Medical Care Kings Mills OH 
 399
 598
 6
 1,003
 (151) 6/5/2012 1995
Fresenius Medical Care Dallas TX 
 377
 1,132
 (42) 1,467
 (246) 2/28/2013 1958
The Fresh Market Winston-Salem NC 
 196
 4,562
 
 4,758
 (843) 2/7/2014 2007
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market Canton MI 
 1,361
 6,976
 
 8,337
 (134) 5/18/2017 2017
Front Range Community College Longmont CO 
 407
 2,428
 55
 2,890
 (601) 1/8/2014 1987
Front Range Community College Longmont CO 
 1,150
 9,067
 609
 10,826
 (2,262) 1/8/2014 1988
Furr's Garland TX 
 1,529
 3,715
 
 5,244
 (967) 6/27/2013 2008
Gainsville Fuel Cleburne TX 
 70
 
 
 70
 
 6/25/2014 2009
Gastro Pub Tulsa OK 27,604
 1,253
 70,274
 1,869
 73,396
 (14,021) 11/5/2013 1995
GE Aviation Auburn AL 24,133
 1,627
 30,920
 
 32,547
 (8,259) 11/21/2012 1995
GE Engine Winfield KS 
 1,078
 5,087
 
 6,165
 (3,207) 5/6/2014 1951
General Electric Longmont CO 
 1,402
 15,640
 855
 17,897
 (4,002) 1/8/2014 1993
General Mills Geneva IL 
 7,457
 22,371
 
 29,828
 (7,340) 5/23/2012 1998
General Mills Fort Wayne IN 
 2,533
 48,130
 
 50,663
 (15,051) 10/18/2012 2012
General Service Administration Mobile AL 
 268
 5,095
 49
 5,412
 (1,501) 6/19/2012 1995
General Service Administration Craig CO 
 129
 1,159
 16
 1,304
 (362) 12/30/2011 1995
General Service Administration Cocoa FL 500
 253
 1,435
 15
 1,703
 (450) 12/13/2011 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar General Orange TX 
 277
 1,150
 
 1,427
 (322) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Vidor TX 
 
 1,182
 
 1,182
 (330) 2/7/2014  2012
Kohl's Spartanburg SC 
 2,984
 5,842
 1
 8,827
 (1,558) 2/7/2014  2006
Merrill Lynch Hopewell NJ 74,250
 17,619
 108,349
 (11,526) 114,442
 (19,607) 2/7/2014  2001
Cigna Phoenix AZ 
 6,194
 16,215
 
 22,409
 (4,346) 2/7/2014  2012
At Home Stockbridge GA 
 2,057
 8,967
 
 11,024
 (2,640) 2/7/2014  1998
Tractor Supply Jackson CA 
 1,209
 3,640
 
 4,849
 (881) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Lakeland FL 
 413
 1,810
 
 2,223
 (536) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General St. Martinville LA 
 175
 1,028
 
 1,203
 (313) 2/7/2014  2012
Giant Eagle Gahanna OH 
 3,549
 16,736
 
 20,285
 (4,309) 2/7/2014  2002
Dollar General Ponca City OK 
 145
 1,161
 
 1,306
 (335) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Tahlequah OK 
 123
 1,101
 
 1,224
 (316) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Wagoner OK 
 31
 1,076
 
 1,107
 (311) 2/7/2014  2012
Wendy's Avon IN 
 538
 407
 
 945
 (172) 2/7/2014  1990
Wendy's Avon IN 
 638
 330
 
 968
 (185) 2/7/2014  1999
Wendy's Greenfield IN 
 429
 214
 
 643
 (100) 2/7/2014  1980
Wendy's Indianapolis IN 
 751
 212
 
 963
 (120) 2/7/2014  1993
Wendy's Carmel IN 
 736
 211
 
 947
 (96) 2/7/2014  1980
Wendy's Carmel IN 
 915
 178
 
 1,093
 (117) 2/7/2014  2001
Wendy's Fishers IN 
 855
 147
 
 1,002
 (98) 2/7/2014  1999
Wendy's Fishers IN 
 761
 229
 
 990
 (130) 2/7/2014  2012
Wendy's Lebanon IN 
 1,265
 108
 
 1,373
 (88) 2/7/2014  1979
Wendy's Noblesville IN 
 590
 42
 
 632
 (26) 2/7/2014  1988
Wendy's Henderson NV 
 933
 842
 
 1,775
 (292) 2/7/2014  1997
Wendy's Henderson NV 
 882
 457
 
 1,339
 (162) 2/7/2014  1999
Wendy's Henderson NV 
 785
 507
 1
 1,293
 (192) 2/7/2014  2000
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 398
 589
 
 987
 (181) 2/7/2014  1976
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 919
 562
 
 1,481
 (205) 2/7/2014  1976
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 789
 583
 
 1,372
 (186) 2/7/2014  1984
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 725
 458
 
 1,183
 (166) 2/7/2014  1986
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 915
 724
 
 1,639
 (249) 2/7/2014  1991
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 633
 392
 
 1,025
 (129) 2/7/2014  1994
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 707
 603
 
 1,310
 (175) 2/7/2014  1990

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
General Service Administration Grangeville ID 2,100
 317
 6,023
 27
 6,367
 (1,824) 3/5/2012 2007
General Service Administration Freeport NY 
 843
 3,372
 
 4,215
 (1,040) 1/10/2012 1995
General Service Administration Plattsburgh NY 
 508
 4,572
 
 5,080
 (1,344) 6/19/2012 2008
General Service Administration Warren PA 
 341
 3,114
 
 3,455
 (919) 6/19/2012 2008
General Service Administration Ponce PR 
 1,780
 9,313
 (4,560) 6,533
 (444) 11/5/2013 1995
General Service Administration Fort Worth TX 
 477
 4,294
 (4) 4,767
 (1,274) 5/9/2012 2010
General Service Administration Gloucester VA 
 287
 1,628
 
 1,915
 (479) 6/20/2012 1995
Giant Eagle Gahanna OH 
 3,549
 16,736
 
 20,285
 (3,059) 2/7/2014 2002
Giant Eagle Lancaster OH 
 2,210
 15,649
 
 17,859
 (2,780) 2/7/2014 2008
Glen's Market Manistee MI 
 294
 6,694
 
 6,988
 (1,359) 2/7/2014 2009
Globe Energy Services Hobbs NM 
 358
 1,129
 
 1,487
 (214) 6/12/2014 2013
Globe Energy Services Big Springs TX 
 426
 599
 
 1,025
 (117) 6/25/2014 2012
Globe Energy Services Levelland TX 
 42
 1,887
 
 1,929
 (353) 6/25/2014 1997
Globe Energy Services Midland TX 
 1,063
 528
 
 1,591
 (103) 6/12/2014 2009
Globe Energy Services Midland TX 
 1,013
 968
 
 1,981
 (167) 6/12/2014 2010
Globe Energy Services Monahans TX 
 50
 538
 
 588
 (102) 6/12/2014 2011
Globe Energy Services Odessa TX 
 104
 1,259
 
 1,363
 (194) 6/25/2014 1963
Globe Energy Services Odessa TX 
 500
 3,891
 
 4,391
 (741) 6/12/2014 1963
Globe Energy Services San Angelo TX 
 821
 1,658
 
 2,479
 (284) 6/12/2014 2012
Globe Energy Services Snyder TX 
 466
 588
 
 1,054
 (119) 6/12/2014 2005
Globe Energy Services Snyder TX 
 174
 1,189
 
 1,363
 (189) 6/12/2014 1975
GM Financial Arlington TX 
 7,901
 35,553
 
 43,454
 (8,007) 11/5/2013 1998
Golden Corral Cullman AL 
 847
 2,390
 (2,143) 1,094
 (96) 2/7/2014 1996
Golden Corral Gilbert AZ 
 871
 2,910
 
 3,781
 (758) 6/27/2013 2006
Golden Corral Goodyear AZ 
 686
 1,939
 
 2,625
 (505) 6/27/2013 2006
Golden Corral Surprise AZ 
 1,258
 4,068
 
 5,326
 (1,059) 6/27/2013 2007
Golden Corral Bakersfield CA 
 2,664
 2,078
 
 4,742
 (533) 2/7/2014 2011
Golden Corral Palatka FL 
 853
 1,048
 (471) 1,430
 (120) 6/27/2013 1997
Golden Corral Albany GA 
 460
 1,863
 
 2,323
 (476) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Brunswick GA 
 390
 2,093
 
 2,483
 (535) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Council Bluffs IA 
 1,140
 1,460
 
 2,600
 (373) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Clarksville IN 
 1,061
 1,344
 
 2,405
 (399) 2/7/2014 2002
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 633
 1,388
 
 2,021
 (372) 2/7/2014  1992
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 1,007
 546
 
 1,553
 (163) 2/7/2014  1995
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 703
 45
 
 748
 (26) 2/7/2014  2000
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 788
 45
 
 833
 (27) 2/7/2014  2003
Wendy's San Marcos TX 
 714
 1,024
 
 1,738
 (288) 2/7/2014  2002
Wendy's Schertz TX 
 793
 109
 
 902
 (37) 2/7/2014  1994
Wendy's Selma TX 
 841
 117
 
 958
 (35) 2/7/2014  2003
Wendy's Bellingham WA 
 502
 477
 
 979
 (146) 2/7/2014  1994
Wendy's Bothell WA 
 687
 292
 
 979
 (73) 2/7/2014  2004
Wendy's Port Angeles WA 
 422
 502
 1
 925
 (251) 2/7/2014  1980
Wendy's Redmond WA 
 969
 123
 
 1,092
 (26) 2/7/2014  1977
Wendy's Silverdale WA 
 808
 201
 
 1,009
 (161) 2/7/2014  1995
Wal-Mart Cary NC 
 2,314
 5,549
 1
 7,864
 (1,638) 2/7/2014  2005
Harps Food Stores Searcy AR 
 705
 4,159
 
 4,864
 (1,169) 2/7/2014  2008
Kirklands Wilmington NC 
 1,127
 1,061
 
 2,188
 (317) 2/7/2014  2004
The Fresh Market Winston-Salem NC 
 196
 4,562
 
 4,758
 (1,195) 2/7/2014  2007
Tractor Supply Auburn CA 
 1,175
 2,901
 
 4,076
 (740) 2/7/2014  2012
Staples Helena MT 
 1,159
 2,452
 
 3,611
 (659) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Pemberville OH 
 146
 1,059
 
 1,205
 (314) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Thibodaux LA 
 234
 1,146
 
 1,380
 (351) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Toledo OH 
 252
 1,149
 
 1,401
 (336) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Hicksville OH 
 156
 1,490
 
 1,646
 (433) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Sandusky OH 
 210
 1,700
 
 1,910
 (493) 2/7/2014  2012
Wal-Mart Valdosta GA 
 3,909
 9,447
 
 13,356
 (2,813) 2/7/2014  1998
Dollar General Fairfield OH 
 131
 1,272
 
 1,403
 (366) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Phenix City AL 
 386
 1,104
 
 1,490
 (336) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Troy AL 
 67
 963
 
 1,030
 (292) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Morganton NC 
 472
 1,108
 
 1,580
 (338) 2/7/2014  2013
Harps Food Stores West Fork AR 
 635
 4,708
 
 5,343
 (1,329) 2/7/2014  2013
Harps Food Stores Haskell AR 
 499
 3,281
 
 3,780
 (954) 2/7/2014  2012
Natural Grocers Salem OR 
 1,339
 3,886
 
 5,225
 (1,125) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Hartselle AL 
 473
 983
 
 1,456
 (302) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Childersburg AL 
 328
 986
 
 1,314
 (302) 2/7/2014  2013


F-150


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Rite Aid Cheektowaga NY 
 436
 3,466
 (1,207) 2,695
 
 2/7/2014  2000
Dick's Sporting Goods Moore OK 
 1,243
 10,426
 
 11,669
 (3,107) 2/7/2014  2012
Dollar General Thomaston GA 
 308
 972
 
 1,280
 (296) 2/7/2014  2013
Harps Food Stores Hot Springs AR 
 592
 4,353
 (10) 4,935
 (1,265) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Mt. Vernon AL 
 260
 1,402
 
 1,662
 (428) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Mobile AL 
 207
 1,039
 
 1,246
 (314) 2/7/2014  2013
Physicians Immediate Care Aurora IL 
 1,043
 1,346
 
 2,389
 (418) 2/7/2014  2003
Physicians Immediate Care Plainfield IL 
 590
 1,747
 
 2,337
 (519) 2/7/2014  2011
Physicians Immediate Care New Lenox IL 
 535
 1,884
 
 2,419
 (563) 2/7/2014  2011
Physicians Immediate Care Mishawaka IN 
 252
 1,351
 
 1,603
 (434) 2/7/2014  2013
Physicians Immediate Care Glendale Heights IL 
 487
 2,256
 
 2,743
 (665) 2/7/2014  1997
Harps Food Stores Hot Springs AR 
 839
 4,486
 (6) 5,319
 (1,232) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Sylacauga AL 
 120
 968
 
 1,088
 (291) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Tyler TX 
 602
 956
 
 1,558
 (296) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Hendersonville NC 
 360
 1,034
 
 1,394
 (312) 2/7/2014  2013
Lowe's Florence KY 
 4,814
 10,189
 398
 15,401
 (2,677) 2/7/2014  1997
Ulta Beauty Jonesboro AR 
 742
 2,289
 
 3,031
 (596) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tampa FL 
 552
 792
 
 1,344
 (237) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Belleview FL 
 332
 829
 
 1,161
 (243) 2/7/2014  2013
DNU Bonita Springs FL 
 672
 918
 
 1,590
 (288) 2/7/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Largo FL 
 844
 962
 
 1,806
 (294) 2/7/2014  2013
Harps Food Stores Cabot AR 
 270
 4,664
 
 4,934
 (1,381) 2/7/2014  2014
Vacant Joplin MO 
 218
 782
 (635) 365
 (10) 2/11/2014  1987
Vacant Joplin MO 
 127
 300
 (280) 147
 
 2/11/2014  1973
Kum & Go Neosho MO 
 504
 1,144
 
 1,648
 (355) 2/11/2014  1997
Dollar General Gratis OH 
 161
 1,042
 
 1,203
 (323) 2/18/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Laurel MS 
 225
 723
 
 948
 (236) 2/19/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bassfield MS 
 96
 752
 
 848
 (244) 2/19/2014  2013
Aaron's Greenwood MS 
 156
 967
 
 1,123
 (306) 2/19/2014  2006
DNU Oviedo FL 
 469
 848
 
 1,317
 (263) 2/19/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Helena GA 
 242
 790
 
 1,032
 (245) 2/19/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Marietta GA 
 366
 749
 
 1,115
 (232) 2/19/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Chateaugay NY 
 133
 910
 
 1,043
 (293) 2/20/2014  2014

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Golden Corral Evansville IN 
 670
 2,707
 
 3,377
 (692) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Kokomo IN 
 780
 2,107
 
 2,887
 (539) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Richmond IN 
 728
 723
 
 1,451
 (185) 2/7/2014 2002
Golden Corral Wichita KS 
 560
 1,306
 
 1,866
 (307) 7/31/2013 2000
Golden Corral Henderson KY 
 600
 1,586
 
 2,186
 (405) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Louisville KY 
 1,020
 1,173
 
 2,193
 (276) 2/7/2014 2001
Golden Corral Owensboro KY 
 1,244
 1,656
 (1,941) 959
 (71) 2/7/2014 1997
Golden Corral Coon Rapids MN 
 1,611
 2,188
 (2,893) 906
 (60) 2/7/2014 2003
Golden Corral Independence MO 
 1,425
 2,437
 
 3,862
 (574) 2/7/2014 2010
Golden Corral Flowood MS 
 680
 2,730
 
 3,410
 (698) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Horn Lake MS 
 925
 2,463
 (2,319) 1,069
 (93) 2/7/2014 1995
Golden Corral Aberdeen NC 
 690
 1,566
 
 2,256
 (400) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Burlington NC 
 840
 2,319
 
 3,159
 (593) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Hickory NC 
 260
 2,658
 
 2,918
 (679) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Bellevue NE 
 520
 1,433
 
 1,953
 (366) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Lincoln NE 
 300
 2,930
 
 3,230
 (749) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Farmington NM 
 270
 3,174
 (2,023) 1,421
 (106) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Akron OH 
 640
 2,133
 
 2,773
 (438) 2/7/2014 2003
Golden Corral Beavercreek OH 
 713
 1,858
 
 2,571
 (367) 2/7/2014 2000
Golden Corral Canton OH 
 647
 2,135
 
 2,782
 (465) 2/7/2014 2002
Golden Corral Cincinnati OH 
 694
 2,066
 
 2,760
 (444) 2/7/2014 1999
Golden Corral Cleveland OH 
 1,109
 2,315
 
 3,424
 (462) 2/7/2014 2004
Golden Corral Columbus OH 
 770
 2,476
 
 3,246
 (633) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Dayton OH 
 579
 1,429
 
 2,008
 (308) 2/7/2014 2000
Golden Corral Dayton OH 
 774
 2,766
 
 3,540
 (583) 2/7/2014 2002

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Vacant Tupelo MS 
 258
 427
 
 685
 (152) 2/20/2014  1998
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Arcadia LA 
 51
 704
 
 755
 (233) 2/20/2014  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Garrison KY 
 134
 737
 
 871
 (241) 2/20/2014  2012
Dollar General Richmond MN 
 96
 836
 
 932
 (256) 2/20/2014  2014
Dollar General West Plains MO 
 90
 769
 
 859
 (236) 2/20/2014  2014
Dollar General Windsor MO 
 86
 829
 
 915
 (255) 2/20/2014  2014
Dollar General Lubbock TX 
 41
 825
 
 866
 (253) 2/20/2014  2014
HD Supply Santee CA 
 2,400
 7,312
 36
 9,748
 (3,101) 2/21/2014  2003
Millenium Chemicals Glen Burnie MD 
 2,127
 23,198
 (3,894) 21,431
 (3,574) 2/21/2014  1984
Advance Auto Parts Rocky Mount NC 
 348
 836
 
 1,184
 (278) 2/21/2014  2005
Cash Wise Stanley ND 
 1,163
 5,037
 
 6,200
 (1,437) 2/21/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Altona NY 
 94
 923
 
 1,017
 (298) 2/21/2014  2014
Tires Plus Duluth GA 
 777
 1,259
 
 2,036
 (410) 2/21/2014  2001
Harps Food Stores Poplar Bluff MO 
 572
 2,991
 4
 3,567
 (440) 2/21/2014  2014
CVS Edinburgh IN 
 420
 1,530
 60
 2,010
 (513) 2/24/2014  1998
CVS Tipton IN 
 311
 1,726
 71
 2,108
 (576) 2/24/2014  1998
Mattress Firm South Bend IN 
 289
 2,445
 
 2,734
 (699) 2/24/2014  2013
Big Lots Chester VA 
 335
 3,373
 169
 3,877
 (1,181) 2/24/2014  2013
Dollar General Mackinaw IL 
 149
 1,011
 
 1,160
 (314) 2/25/2014  2013
Dollar General Wheelersburg OH 
 395
 1,132
 
 1,527
 (347) 2/25/2014  1925
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hopewell VA 
 430
 987
 
 1,417
 (313) 2/26/2014  2014
DaVita Dialysis Clinton MO 
 128
 896
 
 1,024
 (241) 2/26/2014  2003
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mayville WI 
 128
 1,023
 
 1,151
 (321) 2/26/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Flint MI 
 162
 1,027
 
 1,189
 (346) 2/26/2014  2014
Dollar General Barnesville MN 
 86
 841
 
 927
 (258) 2/26/2014  2014
Dollar General Eagle Rock MO 
 133
 786
 
 919
 (241) 2/26/2014  2014
Dollar General Sullivan City TX 
 165
 876
 
 1,041
 (269) 2/26/2014  2014
Walgreens Laurinburg NC 
 355
 3,577
 
 3,932
 (1,152) 2/26/2014  2013
Hobby Lobby Columbia TN 
 951
 2,467
 39
 3,457
 (824) 2/26/2014  1986
American Family Care Garden City ID 
 492
 1,305
 263
 2,060
 (370) 2/26/2014  2003
Dollar General Frisco City AL 
 121
 836
 
 957
 (259) 2/26/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ely MN 
 231
 1,008
 
 1,239
 (321) 2/27/2014  2014
Dollar General Edenton NC 
 240
 1,025
 
 1,265
 (317) 2/28/2014  2013

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Golden Corral Elyria OH 
 1,167
 1,599
 
 2,766
 (325) 2/7/2014 2004
Golden Corral Fairfield OH 
 859
 1,135
 
 1,994
 (240) 2/7/2014 1999
Golden Corral Grove City OH 
 926
 1,859
 
 2,785
 (380) 2/7/2014 2007
Golden Corral Northfield OH 
 947
 1,061
 
 2,008
 (210) 2/7/2014 2004
Golden Corral Ontario OH 
 616
 2,412
 
 3,028
 (518) 2/7/2014 2004
Golden Corral Springfield OH 
 619
 1,142
 
 1,761
 (227) 2/7/2014 2000
Golden Corral Toledo OH 
 838
 3,333
 
 4,171
 (664) 2/7/2014 2004
Golden Corral Zanesville OH 
 487
 2,030
 
 2,517
 (529) 6/27/2013 2002
Golden Corral Midwest City OK 
 1,175
 1,708
 (983) 1,900
 (172) 6/27/2013 1991
Golden Corral Norman OK 
 345
 2,107
 
 2,452
 (549) 6/27/2013 1994
Golden Corral Tulsa OK 
 280
 3,890
 
 4,170
 (994) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Monroeville PA 
 1,647
 849
 
 2,496
 (130) 2/7/2014 1982
Golden Corral Rock Hill SC 
 320
 2,130
 
 2,450
 (544) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Cookeville TN 
 800
 1,937
 
 2,737
 (495) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Baytown TX 
 596
 1,788
 
 2,384
 (421) 7/31/2013 1998
Golden Corral College Station TX 
 1,265
 1,718
 
 2,983
 (447) 6/27/2013 1990
Golden Corral Houston TX 
 1,147
 2,447
 (64) 3,530
 (637) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral San Angelo TX 
 644
 1,702
 
 2,346
 (379) 2/7/2014 2012
Golden Corral Spring TX 
 3,342
 1,207
 
 4,549
 (331) 2/7/2014 2011
Golden Corral Texarkana TX 
 758
 3,031
 
 3,789
 (713) 7/31/2013 2001
Golden Corral Bristol VA 
 750
 2,276
 
 3,026
 (582) 6/27/2013 1995
Golden Corral Beckley WV 
 1,248
 2,258
 (2,507) 999
 (82) 2/7/2014 1995
Goodyear Cumming GA 
 534
 2,516
 
 3,050
 (490) 2/7/2014 2010
Goodyear Cumming GA 
 1,085
 1,915
 
 3,000
 (396) 2/7/2014 2010
Goodyear Mcdonough GA 11,033
 1,797
 21,264
 
 23,061
 (5,199) 1/8/2014 1995
Goodyear Stockbridge GA 13,432
 1,222
 32,119
 
 33,341
 (8,117) 1/8/2014 1995
Goodyear Dekalb IL 20,147
 4,476
 44,516
 
 48,992
 (11,245) 1/8/2014 1999
Goodyear Lockbourne OH 13,144
 3,107
 28,868
 
 31,975
 (6,984) 1/8/2014 1998
Goodyear York PA 22,834
 1,980
 53,396
 
 55,376
 (12,766) 1/8/2014 2001
Goodyear Columbia SC 
 656
 2,077
 
 2,733
 (413) 2/7/2014 2010
Goodyear Corpus Christi TX 
 753
 1,737
 
 2,490
 (337) 2/7/2014 2008
Goodyear Terrell TX 15,350
 2,516
 34,804
 
 37,320
 (8,779) 1/8/2014 1998

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Harps Food Stores Inola OK 
 130
 3,387
 
 3,517
 (978) 3/5/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cape Coral FL 
 675
 1,190
 
 1,865
 (364) 3/5/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Vienna GA 
 62
 721
 
 783
 (222) 3/12/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Omega GA 
 167
 716
 
 883
 (220) 3/12/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Columbia SC 
 429
 719
 (35) 1,113
 (221) 3/12/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fayetteville NC 
 267
 682
 
 949
 (210) 3/14/2014  2013
Lowe's Benton Harbor MI 
 1,011
 7,851
 598
 9,460
 (2,297) 3/17/2014  1994
Mattress Firm Goshen IN 
 211
 1,555
 
 1,766
 (439) 3/20/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jacksonville TX 
 195
 1,003
 
 1,198
 (316) 3/21/2014  2014
Dollar General Pleasantville PA 
 163
 941
 
 1,104
 (286) 3/24/2014  2013
Dollar General Sykesville PA 
 68
 1,075
 
 1,143
 (326) 3/24/2014  2013
Dollar General Wattsburg PA 
 96
 1,031
 
 1,127
 (313) 3/24/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lake Panasoffkee FL 
 237
 696
 
 933
 (214) 3/25/2014  2013
Wendy's Albany GA 
 383
 748
 
 1,131
 (228) 3/26/2014  1999
Wendy's Belpre OH 
 297
 1,194
 1
 1,492
 (365) 3/26/2014  2000
Wendy's Benton KY 
 252
 926
 
 1,178
 (282) 3/26/2014  2001
Wendy's Brookville OH 
 448
 1,072
 
 1,520
 (327) 3/26/2014  1984
Wendy's Clarksburg WV 
 277
 1,181
 
 1,458
 (360) 3/26/2014  1980
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 223
 1,380
 
 1,603
 (421) 3/26/2014  1982
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 304
 1,264
 
 1,568
 (385) 3/26/2014  1974
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 288
 813
 
 1,101
 (248) 3/26/2014  1985
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 274
 1,029
 
 1,303
 (321) 3/26/2014  2004
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 286
 869
 
 1,155
 (265) 3/26/2014  1977
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 259
 838
 
 1,097
 (256) 3/26/2014  1985
Wendy's Eaton OH 
 207
 1,084
 
 1,291
 (157) 3/26/2014  1993
Wendy's Englewood OH 
 261
 924
 
 1,185
 (282) 3/26/2014  1976
Wendy's Fulton NY 
 392
 1,181
 
 1,573
 (360) 3/26/2014  1980
Wendy's Liverpool NY 
 530
 864
 
 1,394
 (125) 3/26/2014  1980
Wendy's Mayfield KY 
 242
 779
 
 1,021
 (238) 3/26/2014  1986
Wendy's Normal IL 
 443
 991
 
 1,434
 (302) 3/26/2014  1985
Wendy's Oswego NY 
 190
 645
 
 835
 (197) 3/26/2014  1986
Wendy's Picayune MS 
 437
 1,032
 
 1,469
 (315) 3/26/2014  1983
Wendy's Vestal NY 
 488
 878
 
 1,366
 (127) 3/26/2014  1995

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
The Gorilla Glue Company Cincinnati OH 
 5,563
 34,887
 
 40,450
 (468) 7/28/2017 1978
Grandy's Ardmore OK 
 454
 
 
 454
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Moore OK 
 320
 428
 
 748
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Oklahoma City OK 
 260
 380
 
 640
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Oklahoma City OK 
 320
 289
 
 609
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Arlington TX 
 734
 
 
 734
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Carrollton TX 
 773
 
 (178) 595
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Carrollton TX 
 847
 
 
 847
 
 6/27/2013 1986
Grandy's Dallas TX 
 725
 
 
 725
 
 7/31/2013 1981
Grandy's Dallas TX 
 357
 
 
 357
 
 7/31/2013 1984
Grandy's Fort Worth TX 
 777
 
 
 777
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Grandy's Fort Worth TX 
 811
 
 
 811
 
 6/27/2013 1985
Grandy's Garland TX 
 623
 
 
 623
 
 6/27/2013 1980
Grandy's Garland TX 
 859
 
 
 859
 
 6/27/2013 1985
Grandy's Greenville TX 
 847
 
 
 847
 
 7/31/2013 1979
Grandy's Irving TX 
 871
 
 
 871
 
 6/27/2013 1983
Grandy's Lancaster TX 
 780
 
 
 780
 
 6/27/2013 1984
Grandy's Mesquite TX 
 871
 
 
 871
 
 6/27/2013 1983
Grandy's Plano TX 
 871
 
 
 871
 
 6/27/2013 1980
Greene's Energy Group Broussard LA 
 455
 6,022
 
 6,477
 (833) 6/12/2014 1980
Habanero's Mexican Grill Hueytown AL 
 60
 639
 
 699
 (163) 6/27/2013 1995
Hanesbrands Rural Hall NC 18,100
 1,798
 41,214
 (50) 42,962
 (7,406) 2/7/2014 1992
Hanesbrands Rural Hall NC 17,990
 1,082
 22,565
 
 23,647
 (7,169) 12/21/2012 1989
Hardee's Morrilton AR 
 175
 937
 
 1,112
 (197) 3/28/2014 1986
Hardee's Jacksonville FL 
 875
 583
 
 1,458
 (137) 7/31/2013 1993
Hardee's Pace FL 
 419
 435
 
 854
 (110) 6/27/2013 1991
Hardee's Williston FL 
 395
 553
 
 948
 (139) 6/27/2013 1992
Hardee's Bremen GA 
 129
 518
 
 647
 (122) 7/31/2013 1980
Hardee's Canton GA 
 488
 539
 
 1,027
 (136) 6/27/2013 1983
Hardee's Mount Vernon IA 
 320
 480
 (6) 794
 (121) 6/27/2013 1987
Hardee's Indian Trail NC 
 777
 553
 
 1,330
 (134) 6/27/2013 1992
Hardee's Old Fort NC 
 300
 904
 
 1,204
 (223) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Newberry SC 
 231
 935
 
 1,166
 (283) 3/27/2014  2013
McAlisters Waco TX 
 429
 791
 
 1,220
 (273) 3/27/2014  2000
Tire Kingdom Greenville SC 
 499
 1,367
 
 1,866
 (435) 3/28/2014  1997
Hardee's Morrilton AR 
 175
 937
 
 1,112
 (286) 3/28/2014  1986
Tractor Supply Silver City NM 
 716
 2,380
 
 3,096
 (654) 3/28/2014  2012
Tractor Supply Farmington NM 
 1,091
 2,194
 
 3,285
 (603) 3/28/2014  2012
Tractor Supply Chickasha OK 
 599
 2,056
 538
 3,193
 (675) 3/28/2014  2014
Dollar General Butler AL 
 338
 1,093
 
 1,431
 (337) 3/28/2014  2014
Dollar General Cullman AL 
 331
 780
 
 1,111
 (240) 3/28/2014  2013
Dollar General Vance AL 
 191
 731
 
 922
 (225) 3/28/2014  2014
Tractor Supply Jonesville MI 
 267
 2,364
 
 2,631
 (650) 3/28/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Chiefland FL 
 322
 1,123
 
 1,445
 (340) 3/31/2014  2013
DaVita Dialysis Akron OH 
 312
 1,994
 
 2,306
 (495) 3/31/2014  1932
FedEx Tulsa OK 
 1,476
 18,054
 542
 20,072
 (7,077) 3/31/2014  1999
LA Fitness Edmond OK 
 962
 6,916
 
 7,878
 (1,920) 3/31/2014  2014
West Marine Anchorage AK 
 1,220
 2,531
 
 3,751
 (745) 3/31/2014  1995
Dollar General Pittsburg IL 
 97
 915
 
 1,012
 (280) 3/31/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Charlotte NC 
 352
 985
 
 1,337
 (299) 4/15/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Raeford NC 
 428
 900
 
 1,328
 (273) 4/17/2014  2014
Dollar General Ohatchee AL 
 97
 942
 
 1,039
 (241) 4/17/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Stuart VA 
 204
 750
 
 954
 (126) 4/18/2014  2013
Walgreens Lockport NY 
 2,358
 2,301
 118
 4,777
 (744) 4/21/2014  1998
Dollar General Monticello KY 
 251
 867
 
 1,118
 (261) 4/25/2014  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Palatka FL 
 316
 1,054
 
 1,370
 (321) 4/25/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jackson Center OH 
 97
 764
 
 861
 (168) 4/28/2014  1989
Inform Diagnostics Irving TX 
 3,237
 37,297
 341
 40,875
 (10,498) 4/28/2014  1997
Tractor Supply Macedon NY 
 168
 1,591
 
 1,759
 (433) 4/29/2014  1992
Dollar General Ely MN 
 174
 944
 
 1,118
 (156) 4/30/2014  2014
Ingersoll Rand Annandale NJ 
 1,367
 14,223
 (90) 15,500
 (7,957) 4/30/2014  1999
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar McCormick SC 
 167
 791
 
 958
 (242) 4/30/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Graceville FL 
 367
 810
 
 1,177
 (247) 4/30/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cordele GA 
 136
 1,049
 
 1,185
 (237) 4/30/2014  2014
Dollar General Richland IN 
 156
 887
 
 1,043
 (148) 4/30/2014  2014

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Hardee's Sparta NC 
 372
 346
 
 718
 (87) 6/27/2013 1983
Hardee's Akron OH 
 207
 483
 
 690
 (113) 7/31/2013 1990
Hardee's Jefferson OH 
 242
 363
 
 605
 (85) 7/31/2013 1989
Hardee's Minerva OH 
 214
 321
 
 535
 (76) 7/31/2013 1990
Hardee's Seville OH 
 151
 454
 
 605
 (107) 7/31/2013 1989
Hardee's Aiken SC 
 220
 450
 
 670
 (111) 6/27/2013 1995
Hardee's Chapin SC 
 380
 741
 
 1,121
 (183) 6/27/2013 1995
Hardee's Chester SC 
 586
 563
 
 1,149
 (104) 7/31/2013 1994
Hardee's Bloomingdale TN 
 270
 844
 
 1,114
 (208) 6/27/2013 1995
Hardee's Clinton TN 
 390
 893
 
 1,283
 (221) 6/27/2013 1995
Hardee's Crossville TN 
 300
 689
 
 989
 (170) 6/27/2013 1995
Hardee's Erwin TN 
 346
 406
 
 752
 (102) 6/27/2013 1982
Hardee's Morristown TN 
 353
 431
 
 784
 (101) 7/31/2013 1991
Hardee's Springfield TN 
 343
 515
 
 858
 (121) 7/31/2013 1990
Hardee's / Red Burrito Attalla AL 
 220
 896
 
 1,116
 (221) 6/27/2013 1995
Harley Davidson Round Rock TX 
 1,688
 9,563
 
 11,251
 (2,537) 7/31/2013 2008
Harps Grocery Cabot AR 
 270
 4,664
 
 4,934
 (989) 2/7/2014 2014
Harps Grocery Haskell AR 
 499
 3,281
 
 3,780
 (685) 2/7/2014 2012
Harps Grocery Hot Springs AR 
 592
 4,353
 
 4,945
 (904) 2/7/2014 2013
Harps Grocery Hot Springs AR 
 839
 4,486
 
 5,325
 (887) 2/7/2014 2013
Harps Grocery Searcy AR 
 705
 4,159
 
 4,864
 (835) 2/7/2014 2008
Harps Grocery West Fork AR 
 635
 4,708
 
 5,343
 (951) 2/7/2014 2013
Harps Grocery Poplar Bluff MO 
 572
 2,991
 4
 3,567
 (290) 2/21/2014 2014
Harps Grocery Inola OK 
 130
 3,387
 
 3,517
 (680) 3/5/2014 2014
Harris Teeter Durham NC 1,910
 3,239
 
 
 3,239
 
 2/7/2014 2009
HD Supply Santee CA 
 2,400
 7,312
 430
 10,142
 (1,908) 2/21/2014 1995
Healthnow Buffalo NY 41,555
 2,569
 89,399
 
 91,968
 (13,871) 2/7/2014 2007
Helmer Scientific Noblesville IN 
 1,431
 10,699
 
 12,130
 (137) 7/27/2017 2012
Hobby Lobby Algonquin IL 
 998
 4,580
 
 5,578
 (76) 6/23/2017 2012
Hobby Lobby Avon IN 
 1,439
 5,855
 
 7,294
 (1,129) 2/7/2014 2007
Hobby Lobby Kannapolis NC 
 1,929
 4,227
 
 6,156
 (849) 2/7/2014 2004
Hobby Lobby Columbia TN 
 951
 2,467
 38
 3,456
 (563) 2/26/2014 1986

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lake Village IN 
 154
 752
 
 906
 (467) 4/30/2014  2013
Wendy's Kinston NC 
 491
 1,159
 
 1,650
 (353) 5/1/2014  2004
Dollar General Cohasset MN 
 87
 964
 
 1,051
 (288) 5/2/2014  2013
Katun Davenport IA 
 454
 7,485
 
 7,939
 (1,731) 5/6/2014  1993
GE Engine Services Winfield KS 
 1,078
 5,087
 22
 6,187
 (4,977) 5/6/2014  1951
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Sodus NY 
 54
 1,441
 
 1,495
 (436) 5/7/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hayneville AL 
 172
 722
 
 894
 (218) 5/7/2014  2013
Dollar General Palatka FL 
 113
 1,196
 
 1,309
 (357) 5/7/2014  2013
Vacant L'Anse MI 
 382
 1,736
 (1,468) 650
 
 5/13/2014  2009
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Claxton GA 
 322
 665
 
 987
 (202) 5/14/2014  2014
McAlisters Sherman TX 
 563
 1,223
 
 1,786
 (374) 5/16/2014  2013
Walgreens Buxton ME 
 
 
 2,132
 2,132
 (546) 5/19/2014  1997
Walgreens Houston TX 
 491
 1,965
 
 2,456
 (711) 5/19/2014  1993
Rite Aid Memphis TN 
 266
 1,062
 54
 1,382
 (362) 5/19/2014  2000
Rite Aid Warren OH 
 668
 2,670
 (2,056) 1,282
 (9) 5/19/2014  1999
Walgreens Cahokia IL 
 394
 1,577
 166
 2,137
 (617) 5/19/2014  1994
Vacant Cleveland OH 
 472
 1,890
 (1,451) 911
 (16) 5/19/2014  1994
Lowe's Jonesboro AR 
 2,101
 8,405
 185
 10,691
 (2,349) 5/19/2014  1994
Lowe's Texas City TX 
 2,313
 9,253
 
 11,566
 (3,538) 5/19/2014  1995
Tractor Supply Woodstock VA 
 524
 2,098
 
 2,622
 (652) 5/19/2014  2004
Sherwin-Williams Ashtabula OH 
 176
 704
 
 880
 (173) 5/19/2014  2003
Sherwin-Williams Boardman OH 
 206
 825
 
 1,031
 (203) 5/19/2014  2003
Sherwin-Williams Angola IN 
 249
 996
 
 1,245
 (296) 5/19/2014  2001
Apria Healthcare Indianapolis IN 
 981
 3,922
 775
 5,678
 (1,328) 5/19/2014  1993
Rite Aid Hayes VA 
 812
 3,247
 
 4,059
 (1,029) 5/19/2014  2005
Walgreens Spartanburg SC 
 894
 3,575
 
 4,469
 (1,133) 5/19/2014  2004
Walgreens Travelers Rest SC 
 882
 3,527
 
 4,409
 (1,118) 5/19/2014  2005
CVS Independence MO 
 780
 3,121
 
 3,901
 (1,009) 5/19/2014  2000
Rite Aid Philadelphia PA 
 633
 2,531
 
 3,164
 (830) 5/19/2014  1999
CVS Duncanville TX 
 670
 2,681
 
 3,351
 (875) 5/19/2014  2000
Rite Aid Wheelersburg OH 
 361
 1,444
 64
 1,869
 (479) 5/19/2014  1998
Tractor Supply Paducah KY 
 393
 1,574
 
 1,967
 (515) 5/19/2014  1995
Rite Aid St. Marys OH 
 581
 2,322
 
 2,903
 (736) 5/19/2014  2005

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Hobby Lobby Logan UT 
 2,683
 3,079
 
 5,762
 (671) 2/7/2014 2008
Home Depot Tucson AZ 
 6,251
 
 
 6,251
 
 2/7/2014 2005
Home Depot San Diego CA 6,650
 12,518
 
 
 12,518
 
 2/7/2014 1998
Home Depot Evans GA 
 4,583
 
 
 4,583
 
 2/7/2014 2009
Home Depot Kennesaw GA 
 1,809
 12,331
 1
 14,141
 (2,203) 2/7/2014 2012
Home Depot Slidell LA 1,996
 5,131
 
 
 5,131
 
 2/7/2014 1998
Home Depot Las Vegas NV 
 7,907
 
 
 7,907
 
 2/7/2014 1998
Home Depot Columbia SC 
 2,911
 15,463
 
 18,374
 (4,986) 11/9/2009 2009
Home Depot Odessa TX 
 1,599
 
 
 1,599
 
 2/7/2014 1998
Home Depot Winchester VA 
 3,955
 18,405
 1,136
 23,496
 (5,339) 2/7/2014 2008
Home Town Buffet Rialto CA 
 265
 1,261
 (1,046) 480
 (108) 1/8/2014 1998
Home Town Buffet Santa Maria CA 
 191
 1,006
 (763) 434
 (55) 1/8/2014 2002
Home Town Buffet Newark DE 
 177
 1,129
 (739) 567
 (95) 1/8/2014 1983
Home Town Buffet Union Gap WA 
 253
 1,320
 (1,223) 350
 (75) 1/8/2014 2002
Houghton Town Center Tucson AZ 
 1,176
 8,565
 
 9,741
 (9) 12/28/2017 2017
Huntington National Bank Conneaut OH 
 205
 477
 6
 688
 (108) 10/1/2013 1971
Huntington National Bank Jefferson OH 
 255
 765
 7
 1,027
 (173) 10/1/2013 1963
Hy-Vee Vermillion SD 2,922
 409
 3,684
 
 4,093
 (1,219) 4/8/2013 1986
IFM Efectors Malvern PA 
 1,816
 
 9,747
 11,563
 (840) 8/27/2014 2014
Igloo Katy TX 
 5,617
 38,470
 
 44,087
 (6,887) 2/7/2014 2004
IHOP Auburn AL 
 1,111
 933
 
 2,044
 (243) 6/27/2013 1998
IHOP Homewood AL 
 610
 1,762
 
 2,372
 (450) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Montgomery AL 
 941
 
 (517) 424
 
 6/27/2013 1998
IHOP Castle Rock CO 
 320
 2,334
 
 2,654
 (597) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Greeley CO 
 120
 1,538
 
 1,658
 (393) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Loveland CO 
 181
 1,534
 
 1,715
 (53) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Pueblo CO 
 330
 1,589
 
 1,919
 (406) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Bossier City LA 
 541
 1,342
 
 1,883
 (349) 6/27/2013 1998
IHOP Natchitoches LA 
 750
 89
 
 839
 (23) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Roseville MI 
 340
 1,071
 125
 1,536
 (275) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Kansas City MO 
 630
 1,002
 
 1,632
 (256) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Southaven MS 
 350
 2,108
 
 2,458
 (539) 6/27/2013 1995
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Tractor Supply Glasgow KY 
 453
 1,812
 
 2,265
 (581) 5/19/2014  2005
Best Buy Tupelo MS 
 484
 1,934
 
 2,418
 (561) 5/19/2014  2005
Vacant Hurst TX 
 497
 1,990
 120
 2,607
 (640) 5/19/2014  1999
Savers Austin TX 
 740
 2,958
 
 3,698
 (865) 5/19/2014  2002
Ross Austin TX 
 658
 2,631
 700
 3,989
 (1,082) 5/19/2014  2002
Vanguard Car Rental College Park GA 
 1,561
 6,244
 
 7,805
 (2,496) 5/19/2014  2002
Tractor Supply Topeka KS 
 446
 1,785
 
 2,231
 (582) 5/19/2014  2006
AutoZone Yorkville IL 
 383
 1,534
 
 1,917
 (478) 5/19/2014  2006
Dollar General Broken Bow OK 
 331
 1,325
 
 1,656
 (360) 5/19/2014  2012
7-Eleven Merritt Island FL 
 540
 2,162
 
 2,702
 (531) 5/19/2014  2009
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Abbeville SC 
 146
 734
 
 880
 (174) 5/23/2014  2014
Advance Auto Parts Tecumseh MI 
 281
 1,214
 
 1,495
 (338) 5/27/2014  2009
Lumber Liquidators Saginaw MI 
 287
 502
 88
 877
 (153) 5/28/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Abbeville GA 
 163
 768
 
 931
 (178) 5/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ellerbe NC 
 225
 781
 
 1,006
 (215) 5/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Camden AL 
 137
 851
 
 988
 (238) 5/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Wilmer AL 
 221
 791
 
 1,012
 (220) 5/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Raeford NC 
 185
 935
 
 1,120
 (255) 5/29/2014  2014
Mattress Firm Goldsboro NC 
 349
 1,385
 
 1,734
 (322) 5/29/2014  2014
Dollar General Porter IN 
 243
 995
 
 1,238
 (150) 5/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Broad Top PA 
 196
 954
 
 1,150
 (212) 5/30/2014  2013
Dollar General Albert Lea MN 
 223
 551
 161
 935
 (149) 5/30/2014  1960
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Estill SC 
 244
 757
 
 1,001
 (178) 6/4/2014  2014
Sunbelt Rentals Mabelvale AR 
 240
 894
 
 1,134
 (246) 6/4/2014  2006
Dept. of Public Advocacy Covington KY 
 3,120
 80,689
 1,582
 85,391
 (18,483) 6/5/2014  1994
Jiffy Lube Houston TX 
 423
 1,037
 
 1,460
 (276) 6/9/2014  2008
Cactus Wellhead DuBois PA 
 129
 2,542
 
 2,671
 (601) 6/12/2014  2012
Select Energy Services Alderson OK 
 260
 1,150
 
 1,410
 (353) 6/12/2014  2008
Gravity Oilfield Services Hobbs NM 
 358
 1,129
 
 1,487
 (328) 6/12/2014  2013
Gravity Oilfield Services Midland TX 
 1,063
 528
 
 1,591
 (158) 6/12/2014  2009
Owens Corning Wichita Falls TX 
 231
 847
 
 1,078
 (213) 6/12/2014  1972




F-156


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Gravity Oilfield Services Snyder TX 
 466
 588
 
 1,054
 (184) 6/12/2014  2005
Gravity Oilfield Services Midland TX 
 1,013
 968
 
 1,981
 (253) 6/12/2014  2010
Waste Connections Weatherford TX 
 102
 3,386
 (2,911) 577
 (239) 6/12/2014  2011
Gravity Oilfield Services Odessa TX 
 500
 3,891
 
 4,391
 (1,133) 6/12/2014  1963
Select Energy Services Damascus AR 
 530
 800
 
 1,330
 (368) 6/12/2014  2009
Amega West West Alexander PA 
 117
 1,787
 (919) 985
 (233) 6/12/2014  2010
Cactus Wellhead Center TX 
 115
 1,886
 
 2,001
 (444) 6/12/2014  2011
Greene's Energy Group Broussard LA 
 455
 6,022
 
 6,477
 (1,261) 6/12/2014  1980
Select Energy Services Frierson LA 
 260
 4,954
 
 5,214
 (1,183) 6/12/2014  2010
Gravity Oilfield Services Monahans TX 
 50
 538
 
 588
 (157) 6/12/2014  2011
MS Energy Services Midland TX 
 1,165
 948
 
 2,113
 (253) 6/12/2014  2012
Select Energy Services Big Wells TX 
 353
 1,820
 
 2,173
 (438) 6/12/2014  2011
Amega West Midland TX 
 591
 379
 
 970
 (101) 6/12/2014  1979
Crest Pumping Technologies Pleasanton TX 
 519
 7,949
 
 8,468
 (3,452) 6/12/2014  2013
Cactus Wellhead Pleasanton TX 
 144
 2,908
 
 3,052
 (694) 6/12/2014  2011
Mastec Houston TX 
 369
 2,669
 
 3,038
 (639) 6/12/2014  2012
Gravity Oilfield Services San Angelo TX 
 821
 1,658
 
 2,479
 (430) 6/12/2014  2012
Energy Maintenance Services US Pasadena TX 
 393
 2,878
 
 3,271
 (682) 6/12/2014  2011
Express Energy Services Pleasanton TX 
 413
 5,541
 
 5,954
 (1,318) 6/12/2014  2012
Gravity Oilfield Services Snyder TX 
 174
 1,189
 
 1,363
 (284) 6/12/2014  1975
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bessemer AL 
 295
 1,301
 
 1,596
 (349) 6/16/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Troy NC 
 341
 621
 
 962
 (152) 6/17/2014  2014
Dollar General Rockford IL 
 464
 597
 27
 1,088
 (147) 6/18/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lumberton NC 
 146
 1,013
 
 1,159
 (230) 6/20/2014  2014
Applebee's St. Charles MO 
 781
 1,075
 
 1,856
 (303) 6/23/2014  1990
Rite Aid West Branch MI 
 418
 1,280
 70
 1,768
 (409) 6/23/2014  1996
Rite Aid Bay City MI 
 463
 1,629
 62
 2,154
 (477) 6/24/2014  1996
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Sebring FL 
 492
 1,063
 
 1,555
 (246) 6/24/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Charlotte NC 
 412
 992
 
 1,404
 (219) 6/25/2014  2014
Schmitz & Schmitz Gainesville TX 
 29
 1,950
 
 1,979
 (396) 6/25/2014  1930
Shale Tank Truck Midland TX 
 757
 939
 
 1,696
 (263) 6/25/2014  2012
Gravity Oilfield Services Odessa TX 
 104
 1,259
 
 1,363
 (290) 6/25/2014  1963
Select Energy Services Dilley TX 
 308
 1,416
 
 1,724
 (359) 6/25/2014  2012

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
IHOP Greenville SC 
 610
 1,551
 
 2,161
 (396) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Clarksville TN 
 530
 1,346
 
 1,876
 (344) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Murfreesboro TN 
 600
 1,687
 
 2,287
 (431) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Baytown TX 
 698
 1,297
 
 1,995
 (305) 7/31/2013 1998
IHOP Corpus Christi TX 
 1,176
 
 
 1,176
 
 7/31/2013 1995
IHOP Fort Worth TX 
 560
 1,879
 
 2,439
 (480) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Houston TX 
 760
 2,462
 
 3,222
 (629) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Killeen TX 
 380
 1,028
 
 1,408
 (263) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Lake Jackson TX 
 370
 2,018
 
 2,388
 (516) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Leon Valley TX 
 650
 2,055
 
 2,705
 (665) 6/27/2013 1995
IHOP Auburn WA 
 780
 1,878
 
 2,658
 (480) 6/27/2013 1995
Ingersoll Rand Annandale NJ 
 1,367
 14,223
 (90) 15,500
 (5,249) 4/30/2014 1999
Ingram Micro Amherst NY 
 4,107
 20,347
 
 24,454
 (4,068) 6/25/2014 1986
Invensys Systems Foxboro MA 
 11,784
 
 27,888
 39,672
 (3,504) 6/27/2014 1965
Iron Mountain Columbus OH 
 405
 3,642
 1,263
 5,310
 (1,217) 9/28/2012 1954
Iron Mountain Mohnton PA 
 197
 6,152
 
 6,349
 (1,032) 7/2/2014 1979
IRS Gateway Center Covington KY 
 3,120
 80,689
 1,561
 85,370
 (12,096) 6/5/2014 1994
Irving Oil Belfast ME 
 339
 698
 
 1,037
 (170) 2/7/2014 1997
Irving Oil Bethel ME 
 182
 331
 
 513
 (83) 2/7/2014 1990
Irving Oil Boothbay Harbor ME 
 413
 550
 
 963
 (143) 2/7/2014 1993
Irving Oil Caribou ME 
 187
 404
 
 591
 (97) 2/7/2014 1990
Irving Oil Fort Kent ME 
 358
 352
 
 710
 (100) 2/7/2014 1973
Irving Oil Kennebunk ME 
 469
 541
 
 1,010
 (146) 2/7/2014 1980
Irving Oil Lincoln ME 
 360
 360
 
 720
 (91) 2/7/2014 1994
Irving Oil Orono ME 
 228
 272
 
 500
 (66) 2/7/2014 1984
Irving Oil Saco ME 
 619
 222
 
 841
 (78) 2/7/2014 1995
Irving Oil Skowhegan ME 
 541
 492
 
 1,033
 (135) 2/7/2014 1988
Irving Oil Conway NH 
 173
 525
 
 698
 (119) 2/7/2014 2004
Irving Oil Dover NH 
 380
 717
 
 1,097
 (170) 2/7/2014 1988
Irving Oil Rochester NH 
 290
 747
 
 1,037
 (171) 2/7/2014 1970
Irving Oil Dummerston VT 
 185
 353
 
 538
 (95) 2/7/2014 1993
Irving Oil Rutland VT 
 249
 220
 
 469
 (54) 2/7/2014 1984

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Fun Town RV Cleburne TX 
 476
 547
 
 1,023
 (143) 6/25/2014  2007
Select Energy Services Odessa TX 
 460
 1,998
 
 2,458
 (536) 6/25/2014  1982
Weir Williston ND 
 273
 6,232
 
 6,505
 (1,451) 6/25/2014  2012
Pro Oil & Gas Services, LLC Cuero TX 
 127
 982
 
 1,109
 (233) 6/25/2014  2014
Gravity Oilfield Services Levelland TX 
 42
 1,887
 
 1,929
 (541) 6/25/2014  1997
Select Energy Services Chireno TX 
 388
 5,470
 
 5,858
 (1,292) 6/25/2014  2011
Willbros Tulsa OK 
 2,239
 6,375
 
 8,614
 (1,419) 6/25/2014  1982
Forum Energy Technologies Gainesville TX 
 123
 6,019
 
 6,142
 (1,465) 6/25/2014  2008
Fun Town RV Cleburne TX 
 262
 369
 
 631
 (100) 6/25/2014  2008
Fun Town RV Cleburne TX 
 70
 
 
 70
 
 6/25/2014  2009
Select Energy Services Cleburne TX 
 154
 2,333
 
 2,487
 (563) 6/25/2014  2008
1888 Industrial Services Midland TX 
 508
 815
 1
 1,324
 (221) 6/25/2014  2012
Gravity Oilfield Services Big Springs TX 
 426
 599
 
 1,025
 (180) 6/25/2014  2012
Forum Energy Technologies Guthrie OK 
 393
 1,305
 
 1,698
 (325) 6/25/2014  1979
Ingram Micro Amherst NY 
 4,107
 20,347
 
 24,454
 (6,260) 6/25/2014  1986
FedEx Tempe AZ 
 2,914
 12,300
 163
 15,377
 (3,316) 6/25/2014  2004
Sedgwick Claims Mgmt Services Dublin OH 
 945
 8,520
 
 9,465
 (2,219) 6/26/2014  1997
Tractor Supply Millbury MA 
 806
 3,094
 
 3,900
 (754) 6/26/2014  2013
Cash Wise Tioga ND 
 1,065
 4,581
 
 5,646
 (1,076) 6/26/2014  2014
Schneider Electric Foxboro MA 
 11,784
 
 27,888
 39,672
 (6,261) 6/27/2014  1965
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lovington NM 
 54
 722
 
 776
 (162) 6/30/2014  2014
Rockwell Collins Sterling VA 
 4,285
 29,802
 6,288
 40,375
 (7,637) 6/30/2014  2011
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Charlotte NC 
 490
 1,066
 
 1,556
 (235) 7/2/2014  2014
Dollar General Minonk IL 
 56
 1,034
 
 1,090
 (234) 7/2/2014  2014
Iron Mountain Mohnton PA 
 197
 6,152
 
 6,349
 (1,585) 7/2/2014  1979
Mattress Firm Painesville OH 
 437
 1,318
 
 1,755
 (344) 7/10/2014  2014
Beall's Lakeland FL 
 2,033
 4,809
 1
 6,843
 (1,352) 7/16/2014  2006
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Grove Hill AL 
 144
 741
 
 885
 (165) 7/24/2014  2013
Cactus Wellhead Williston ND 
 72
 3,735
 
 3,807
 (839) 7/24/2014  2011
Superior Energy Services Gainesville TX 
 284
 10,475
 3
 10,762
 (8,410) 7/24/2014  1982
Dollar General Andalusia AL 
 317
 914
 9
 1,240
 (136) 7/24/2014  2014
Red Lobster Birmingham AL 
 
 741
 
 741
 (209) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Chandler AZ 
 
 252
 
 252
 (188) 7/28/2014  2000

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Irving Oil Westminster VT 
 108
 437
 
 545
 (104) 2/7/2014 1990
Jack in the Box Avondale AZ 
 110
 2,237
 
 2,347
 (553) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Chandler AZ 
 450
 1,447
 
 1,897
 (358) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Folsom CA 
 280
 2,423
 
 2,703
 (599) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Sacramento CA 
 476
 1,110
 
 1,586
 (261) 7/31/2013 1991
Jack in the Box West Sacramento CA 
 590
 1,710
 
 2,300
 (422) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Burley ID 
 240
 1,430
 
 1,670
 (353) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Belleville IL 
 200
 966
 
 1,166
 (239) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Florissant MO 
 502
 1,515
 
 2,017
 (374) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box St. Louis MO 
 420
 1,494
 
 1,914
 (369) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Salem OR 
 580
 1,301
 
 1,881
 (322) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Tigard OR 
 620
 1,361
 
 1,981
 (336) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Arlington TX 
 420
 1,325
 
 1,745
 (327) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Arlington TX 
 420
 1,365
 
 1,785
 (337) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Cleburne TX 
 291
 1,647
 
 1,938
 (387) 7/31/2013 2000
Jack in the Box Corinth TX 
 400
 1,416
 
 1,816
 (350) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Farmers Branch TX 
 460
 1,640
 
 2,100
 (405) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Fort Worth TX 
 490
 1,702
 
 2,192
 (421) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Georgetown TX 
 600
 1,508
 
 2,108
 (373) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Granbury TX 
 380
 1,449
 
 1,829
 (358) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Grand Prairie TX 
 600
 1,856
 
 2,456
 (459) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Grapevine TX 
 470
 1,344
 
 1,814
 (332) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Gun Barrel City TX 
 300
 961
 (866) 395
 (9) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 460
 1,437
 
 1,897
 (355) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 390
 1,172
 
 1,562
 (290) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 330
 1,845
 
 2,175
 (456) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 410
 1,621
 
 2,031
 (401) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Houston TX 
 450
 1,396
 
 1,846
 (345) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Gilbert AZ 
 
 460
 
 460
 (243) 7/28/2014  2007
Red Lobster Surprise AZ 
 
 565
 
 565
 (277) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Tucson AZ 
 
 676
 
 676
 (277) 7/28/2014  2009
Red Lobster Bakersfield CA 
 
 731
 
 731
 (319) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Chula Vista CA 
 
 1,671
 
 1,671
 (431) 7/28/2014  1988
Red Lobster Inglewood CA 
 
 2,211
 
 2,211
 (647) 7/28/2014  2007
Red Lobster Oceanside CA 
 
 1,529
 
 1,529
 (411) 7/28/2014  2010
Red Lobster San Bruno CA 
 
 1,611
 
 1,611
 (575) 7/28/2014  1992
Red Lobster San Diego CA 
 
 1,113
 
 1,113
 (656) 7/28/2014  1988
Red Lobster Valencia CA 
 
 841
 
 841
 (465) 7/28/2014  1988
Red Lobster Colorado Springs CO 
 
 1,512
 
 1,512
 (412) 7/28/2014  2004
Red Lobster Bridgeport CT 
 
 323
 
 323
 (201) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Danbury CT 
 
 159
 
 159
 (140) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Newark DE 
 
 1,515
 
 1,515
 (509) 7/28/2014  2006
Red Lobster Boynton Beach FL 
 
 1,631
 
 1,631
 (491) 7/28/2014  2008
Red Lobster Hollywood FL 
 
 2,282
 
 2,282
 (714) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Kissimmee FL 
 
 1,364
 
 1,364
 (524) 7/28/2014  2002
Red Lobster Miami FL 
 
 1,062
 
 1,062
 (473) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Panama City FL 
 
 1,515
 
 1,515
 (461) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Austell GA 
 
 1,092
 
 1,092
 (354) 7/28/2014  2001
Red Lobster Tucker GA 
 
 1,718
 
 1,718
 (527) 7/28/2014  1973
Red Lobster Cedar Rapids IA 
 
 495
 
 495
 (291) 7/28/2014  1981
Red Lobster Boise ID 
 
 714
 
 714
 (309) 7/28/2014  1988
Red Lobster Pocatello ID 
 
 773
 
 773
 (477) 7/28/2014  1994
Red Lobster Fairview Heights IL 
 
 1,806
 
 1,806
 (542) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Forsyth IL 
 
 1,083
 
 1,083
 (389) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Norridge IL 
 
 929
 
 929
 (544) 7/28/2014  1979
Red Lobster Schaumburg IL 
 
 665
 
 665
 (271) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Avon IN 
 
 864
 
 864
 (382) 7/28/2014  2001
Red Lobster Lexington KY 
 
 1,094
 
 1,094
 (372) 7/28/2014  2011
Red Lobster Baton Rouge LA 
 
 1,535
 
 1,535
 (460) 7/28/2014  2011
Red Lobster Annapolis MD 
 
 644
 
 644
 (222) 7/28/2014  1985
Red Lobster Frederick MD 
 
 319
 
 319
 (214) 7/28/2014  1997

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Jack in the Box Hutchins TX 
 330
 1,363
 
 1,693
 (337) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Lufkin TX 
 440
 1,544
 
 1,984
 (381) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Lufkin TX 
 450
 1,563
 
 2,013
 (386) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Mesquite TX 
 560
 1,652
 
 2,212
 (408) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Missouri City TX 
 451
 837
 
 1,288
 (197) 7/31/2013 1991
Jack in the Box Nacogdoches TX 
 340
 1,320
 
 1,660
 (326) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Orange TX 
 270
 1,661
 
 1,931
 (410) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Port Arthur TX 
 460
 1,405
 
 1,865
 (347) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box San Antonio TX 
 400
 1,244
 
 1,644
 (307) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box San Antonio TX 
 470
 1,256
 
 1,726
 (310) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box San Antonio TX 
 350
 1,249
 
 1,599
 (309) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Spring TX 
 570
 1,340
 
 1,910
 (331) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Spring TX 
 450
 1,487
 
 1,937
 (367) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Texas City TX 
 454
 844
 
 1,298
 (212) 6/27/2013 1991
Jack in the Box Tyler TX 
 450
 1,025
 
 1,475
 (253) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Weatherford TX 
 480
 1,329
 
 1,809
 (328) 6/27/2013 1995
Jack in the Box Enumclaw WA 
 380
 1,238
 
 1,618
 (306) 6/27/2013 1995
Jeremiah's Italian Ice Winter Springs FL 
 734
 
 
 734
 
 7/31/2013 1995
Jiffy Lube Houston TX 
 423
 1,037
 
 1,460
 (180) 6/9/2014 2008
Jo-Ann's Shakopee MN 
 994
 1,807
 
 2,801
 (350) 2/7/2014 2012
Johnny Carinos Rogers AR 
 997
 2,540
 
 3,537
 (661) 6/27/2013 2001
Johnny Carinos Columbus IN 
 809
 1,888
 
 2,697
 (491) 8/30/2013 2004
Johnny Carinos Muncie IN 
 540
 2,160
 
 2,700
 (562) 8/30/2013 2003
Johnny Carinos Houston TX 
 1,328
 2,656
 
 3,984
 (692) 6/27/2013 2002
Johnny Carinos Midland TX 
 998
 2,329
 
 3,327
 (618) 7/31/2013 2000
Katun Corp. Davenport IA 
 454
 7,485
 
 7,939
 (1,158) 5/6/2014 1993
Keane Frac Pleasanton TX 
 328
 4,804
 (2,858) 2,274
 (148) 9/25/2014 2014
Kentucky Fried Chicken Bloomington IL 
 576
 1,466
 
 2,042
 (369) 6/27/2013 2004
Kentucky Fried Chicken Charleston IL 
 282
 1,514
 
 1,796
 (381) 6/27/2013 2003
Kentucky Fried Chicken Decatur IL 
 276
 1,619
 
 1,895
 (407) 6/27/2013 2001
Kentucky Fried Chicken Dolton IL 
 167
 946
 
 1,113
 (223) 7/31/2013 1975
Kentucky Fried Chicken Elmhurst IL 
 242
 969
 
 1,211
 (228) 7/31/2013 1990

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Lanham MD 
 
 455
 
 455
 (238) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster Owings Mills MD 
 
 229
 
 229
 (146) 7/28/2014  1989
Red Lobster Lansing MI 
 
 1,534
 
 1,534
 (470) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Rochester MN 
 
 1,674
 
 1,674
 (437) 7/28/2014  1987
Red Lobster Chesterfield MO 
 
 1,762
 
 1,762
 (593) 7/28/2014  1973
Red Lobster St. Peters MO 
 
 1,543
 
 1,543
 (745) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Springfield MO 
 
 1,510
 
 1,510
 (714) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Meridian MS 
 
 872
 
 872
 (313) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Concord NC 
 
 1,506
 
 1,506
 (554) 7/28/2014  2002
Red Lobster Lincoln NE 
 
 254
 
 254
 (134) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Cherry Hill NJ 
 
 2,274
 
 2,274
 (812) 7/28/2014  1984
Red Lobster Deptford NJ 
 
 1,608
 
 1,608
 (604) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Vineland NJ 
 
 1,779
 
 1,779
 (492) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Clovis NM 
 
 318
 
 318
 (186) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Brooklyn NY 
 
 5,897
 
 5,897
 (1,865) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Hicksville NY 
 
 870
 
 870
 (332) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster Ronkonkoma NY 
 
 1,109
 
 1,109
 (409) 7/28/2014  2005
Red Lobster Valley Stream NY 
 
 1,417
 
 1,417
 (552) 7/28/2014  1983
Red Lobster Yonkers NY 
 
 894
 
 894
 (335) 7/28/2014  2012
Red Lobster Akron OH 
 
 1,398
 
 1,398
 (505) 7/28/2014  1981
Red Lobster Columbus OH 
 
 1,100
 
 1,100
 (435) 7/28/2014  2002
Red Lobster Dublin OH 
 
 873
 
 873
 (300) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Niles OH 
 
 1,799
 
 1,799
 (561) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster North Olmsted OH 
 
 2,291
 
 2,291
 (628) 7/28/2014  1974
Red Lobster St. Clairsville OH 
 
 853
 
 853
 (458) 7/28/2014  1997
Red Lobster Bartonsville PA 
 
 2,389
 
 2,389
 (646) 7/28/2014  2010
Red Lobster Lancaster PA 
 
 2,968
 
 2,968
 (703) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Philadelphia PA 
 
 1,902
 
 1,902
 (469) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Pittsburgh PA 
 
 1,379
 
 1,379
 (514) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Pottstown PA 
 
 1,115
 
 1,115
 (649) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Scranton PA 
 
 1,563
 
 1,563
 (627) 7/28/2014  2001
Red Lobster State College PA 
 
 1,026
 
 1,026
 (522) 7/28/2014  1999
Red Lobster Washington PA 
 
 694
 
 694
 (241) 7/28/2014  1976

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Kentucky Fried Chicken Hazel Crest IL 
 153
 1,376
 
 1,529
 (324) 7/31/2013 1982
Kentucky Fried Chicken Homewood IL 
 660
 1,541
 
 2,201
 (362) 7/31/2013 1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken Matteson IL 
 399
 2,259
 
 2,658
 (531) 7/31/2013 1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken Mattoon IL 
 113
 1,019
 
 1,132
 (240) 7/31/2013 1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken Oak Forest IL 
 185
 1,047
 
 1,232
 (246) 7/31/2013 1955
Kentucky Fried Chicken Rockford IL 
 201
 1,142
 
 1,343
 (268) 7/31/2013 1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Springfield IL 
 267
 1,068
 
 1,335
 (251) 7/31/2013 1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken Springfield IL 
 212
 1,203
 
 1,415
 (283) 7/31/2013 1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken Westchester IL 
 238
 952
 
 1,190
 (224) 7/31/2013 1973
Kentucky Fried Chicken Crawfordsville IN 
 159
 1,068
 
 1,227
 (269) 6/27/2013 1979
Kentucky Fried Chicken Frankfort IN 
 99
 893
 
 992
 (210) 7/31/2013 1985
Kentucky Fried Chicken Franklin IN 
 205
 1,375
 
 1,580
 (346) 6/27/2013 1976
Kentucky Fried Chicken Greenwood IN 
 339
 1,405
 
 1,744
 (354) 6/27/2013 1976
Kentucky Fried Chicken Lebanon IN 
 337
 1,348
 
 1,685
 (317) 7/31/2013 1983
Kentucky Fried Chicken Deming NM 
 220
 691
 
 911
 (171) 6/27/2013 1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Las Cruces NM 
 270
 498
 
 768
 (123) 6/27/2013 1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken Warren OH 
 426
 640
 (421) 645
 (31) 7/31/2013 1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken New Kensington PA 
 324
 487
 (260) 551
 (26) 7/31/2013 1967
Kentucky Fried Chicken Appleton WI 
 350
 874
 
 1,224
 (216) 6/27/2013 1995
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Granite City IL 
 102
 1,083
 
 1,185
 (273) 6/27/2013 1987
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Allison Park PA 
 246
 683
 
 929
 (172) 6/27/2013 1978
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Germantown WI 
 368
 913
 
 1,281
 (230) 6/27/2013 1989
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Green Bay WI 
 208
 1,022
 
 1,230
 (257) 6/27/2013 1986
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Milwaukee WI 
 396
 773
 
 1,169
 (194) 6/27/2013 1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Milwaukee WI 
 281
 795
 
 1,076
 (200) 6/27/2013 1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Milwaukee WI 
 89
 750
 
 839
 (189) 6/27/2013 1989
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Milwaukee WI 
 197
 975
 
 1,172
 (245) 6/27/2013 1991
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Milwaukee WI 
 138
 924
 
 1,062
 (233) 6/27/2013 1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W South Milwaukee WI 
 197
 695
 
 892
 (175) 6/27/2013 1993
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W Wauwatosa WI 
 135
 615
 
 750
 (155) 6/27/2013 1992
Kentucky Fried Chicken / A&W West Bend WI 
 185
 705
 
 890
 (177) 6/27/2013 1972
Ker's WingHouse Bar and Grill Brandon FL 
 340
 654
 
 994
 (167) 6/27/2013 1995

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Whitehall PA 
 
 2,155
 
 2,155
 (833) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Columbia SC 
 
 918
 
 918
 (324) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster Myrtle Beach SC 
 
 462
 
 462
 (254) 7/28/2014  2006
Red Lobster Spartanburg SC 
 
 1,136
 
 1,136
 (319) 7/28/2014  1973
Red Lobster Sevierville TN 
 
 1,062
 
 1,062
 (438) 7/28/2014  2002
Red Lobster Burleson TX 
 
 356
 
 356
 (218) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster College Station TX 
 
 643
 
 643
 (236) 7/28/2014  1983
Red Lobster Conroe TX 
 
 557
 
 557
 (263) 7/28/2014  2011
Red Lobster El Paso TX 
 
 414
 
 414
 (249) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster El Paso TX 
 
 883
 
 883
 (318) 7/28/2014  2008
Red Lobster Fort Worth TX 
 
 239
 
 239
 (139) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster Houston TX 
 
 399
 
 399
 (242) 7/28/2014  1974
Red Lobster Humble TX 
 
 1,087
 
 1,087
 (349) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster Laredo TX 
 
 819
 
 819
 (355) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster San Antonio TX 
 
 963
 
 963
 (262) 7/28/2014  1974
Red Lobster Sugar Land TX 
 
 708
 
 708
 (242) 7/28/2014  1981
Red Lobster Charlottesville VA 
 
 1,021
 
 1,021
 (308) 7/28/2014  1986
Red Lobster Midlothian VA 
 
 655
 
 655
 (317) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Sterling VA 
 
 646
 
 646
 (311) 7/28/2014  2001
Red Lobster Winchester VA 
 
 357
 
 357
 (213) 7/28/2014  2006
Red Lobster Olympia WA 
 
 596
 
 596
 (362) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Spokane WA 
 
 1,427
 
 1,427
 (441) 7/28/2014  2009
Red Lobster Charleston WV 
 
 1,100
 
 1,100
 (439) 7/28/2014  2003
Red Lobster Dothan AL 
 726
 1,244
 
 1,970
 (258) 7/28/2014  1979
Red Lobster Vestavia Hills AL 
 1,257
 1,417
 
 2,674
 (246) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Pine Bluff AR 
 226
 1,194
 
 1,420
 (297) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Decatur GA 
 1,102
 1,873
 
 2,975
 (312) 7/28/2014  1973
Red Lobster Savannah GA 
 475
 2,236
 
 2,711
 (362) 7/28/2014  1971
Red Lobster Davenport IA 
 619
 2,896
 
 3,515
 (469) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Jackson MI 
 235
 2,174
 
 2,409
 (373) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Warren MI 
 349
 2,656
 
 3,005
 (434) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Roseville MN 
 1,291
 1,298
 
 2,589
 (223) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Crestwood MO 
 518
 1,466
 
 1,984
 (265) 7/28/2014  1975

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Ker's WingHouse Bar and Grill Clearwater FL 
 550
 627
 
 1,177
 (160) 6/27/2013 1995
Kettle Restaurant San Antonio TX 
 168
 206
 
 374
 (48) 7/31/2013 1965
Key Bank Spencerport NY 
 59
 1,112
 
 1,171
 (271) 6/5/2013 1960
Kirklands Wilmington NC 
 1,127
 1,061
 
 2,188
 (222) 2/7/2014 2004
Kohl's Monrovia CA 8,700
 8,052
 7,891
 
 15,943
 (1,542) 2/7/2014 1982
Kohl's Tavares FL 4,670
 4,173
 
 
 4,173
 
 2/7/2014 2008
Kohl's Fort Dodge IA 
 1,431
 3,109
 
 4,540
 (609) 2/7/2014 2011
Kohl's Salina KS 
 964
 5,009
 
 5,973
 (877) 2/7/2014 2009
Kohl's Howell MI 7,705
 547
 10,399
 
 10,946
 (3,501) 3/28/2013 2003
Kohl's Saginaw MI 
 1,110
 6,932
 
 8,042
 (1,212) 2/7/2014 2011
Kohl's Columbia SC 
 1,532
 14,561
 
 16,093
 (2,413) 2/7/2014 2007
Kohl's Spartanburg SC 
 2,984
 5,842
 
 8,826
 (1,089) 2/7/2014 2006
Kohl's Brownsville TX 
 2,756
 3,423
 
 6,179
 (30) 2/7/2014 2007
Kohl's Mcallen TX 3,479
 1,286
 7,321
 
 8,607
 (1,319) 2/7/2014 2005
Kohl's Rice Lake WI 
 1,268
 7,788
 
 9,056
 (1,365) 2/7/2014 2011
Kroger Calhoun GA 
 
 6,279
 
 6,279
 (1,293) 11/5/2013 1996
Kroger Lithonia GA 
 
 6,250
 
 6,250
 (1,287) 11/5/2013 1995
Kroger Suwanee GA 
 
 7,574
 
 7,574
 (1,560) 11/5/2013 1995
Kroger Suwanee GA 
 
 7,691
 
 7,691
 (1,584) 11/5/2013 1993
Kroger Frankfort KY 
 
 5,794
 
 5,794
 (1,193) 11/5/2013 1995
Kroger Madisonville KY 
 
 5,715
 
 5,715
 (1,177) 11/5/2013 1996
Kroger Murray KY 
 
 6,165
 
 6,165
 (1,269) 11/5/2013 1995
Kroger Owensboro KY 
 
 6,073
 
 6,073
 (1,251) 11/5/2013 1996
Kroger Franklin TN 
 
 7,782
 
 7,782
 (1,602) 11/5/2013 1996
Kroger Knoxville TN 
 
 7,642
 
 7,642
 (1,574) 11/5/2013 1996
Krystal Greenville AL 
 195
 1,147
 182
 1,524
 (306) 6/27/2013 1995
Krystal Huntsville AL 
 348
 811
 
 1,159
 (269) 4/23/2013 1960
Krystal Huntsville AL 
 352
 654
 125
 1,131
 (221) 4/23/2013 1971
Krystal Huntsville AL 
 305
 712
 125
 1,142
 (232) 6/10/2013 1985
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 259
 1,036
 
 1,295
 (374) 9/21/2012 1964
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 560
 829
 175
 1,564
 (227) 6/27/2013 1995
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 303
 562
 125
 990
 (191) 4/23/2013 1962
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Jefferson City MO 
 593
 1,092
 
 1,685
 (233) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Bismarck ND 
 831
 3,321
 
 4,152
 (528) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Kearney NE 
 678
 1,109
 
 1,787
 (281) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Mechanicsburg PA 
 676
 2,656
 
 3,332
 (435) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Layton UT 
 1,577
 1,333
 
 2,910
 (317) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster Montgomery AL 
 1,034
 1,413
 
 2,447
 (286) 7/28/2014  1983
Red Lobster Palm Desert CA 
 1,132
 1,321
 
 2,453
 (325) 7/28/2014  2012
Red Lobster Riverside CA 
 914
 2,459
 
 3,373
 (408) 7/28/2014  1988
Red Lobster Fort Pierce FL 
 618
 1,491
 
 2,109
 (335) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Pembroke Pines FL 
 479
 3,126
 
 3,605
 (536) 7/28/2014  1987
Red Lobster Plantation FL 
 1,975
 1,733
 
 3,708
 (351) 7/28/2014  1989
Red Lobster Sebring FL 
 1,003
 1,487
 
 2,490
 (302) 7/28/2014  1992
Red Lobster Winter Haven FL 
 1,055
 2,217
 
 3,272
 (344) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Athens GA 
 669
 2,027
 
 2,696
 (322) 7/28/2014  1971
Red Lobster Dalton GA 
 775
 2,045
 
 2,820
 (375) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Douglasville GA 
 1,356
 1,161
 
 2,517
 (265) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Gurnee IL 
 1,735
 2,286
 
 4,021
 (385) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster Marion IL 
 399
 2,399
 
 2,798
 (450) 7/28/2014  1992
Red Lobster Oak Lawn IL 
 1,825
 2,316
 
 4,141
 (376) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Peru IL 
 339
 1,169
 
 1,508
 (277) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Anderson IN 
 813
 1,272
 
 2,085
 (256) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster Mishawaka IN 
 593
 2,205
 
 2,798
 (370) 7/28/2014  1974
Red Lobster Owensboro KY 
 815
 1,485
 
 2,300
 (298) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster St. Matthews KY 
 1,640
 1,841
 
 3,481
 (311) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Suitland MD 
 1,090
 3,112
 
 4,202
 (484) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Dearborn Heights MI 
 822
 2,156
 
 2,978
 (367) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Livonia MI 
 635
 1,824
 
 2,459
 (356) 7/28/2014  1987
Red Lobster Mt. Pleasant MI 
 508
 1,346
 
 1,854
 (308) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster Portage MI 
 396
 2,496
 
 2,892
 (410) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Southgate MI 
 611
 2,531
 
 3,142
 (465) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Mankato MN 
 867
 1,642
 
 2,509
 (352) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster St. Joseph MO 
 1,023
 1,002
 
 2,025
 (212) 7/28/2014  1979
Red Lobster Asheville NC 
 544
 2,865
 
 3,409
 (471) 7/28/2014  1980


F-162


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Fayetteville NC 
 675
 2,908
 
 3,583
 (433) 7/28/2014  1978
Red Lobster Greensboro NC 
 1,372
 1,785
 
 3,157
 (310) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Raleigh NC 
 946
 2,183
 
 3,129
 (349) 7/28/2014  1983
Red Lobster Fargo ND 
 888
 2,933
 
 3,821
 (485) 7/28/2014  1981
Red Lobster Liverpool NY 
 900
 2,088
 
 2,988
 (366) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Beavercreek OH 
 551
 2,334
 
 2,885
 (439) 7/28/2014  1994
Red Lobster Lima OH 
 843
 658
 
 1,501
 (210) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Oklahoma City OK 
 610
 2,681
 
 3,291
 (429) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster Shawnee OK 
 437
 1,744
 
 2,181
 (334) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Florence SC 
 779
 1,506
 
 2,285
 (319) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Clarksville TN 
 543
 2,223
 
 2,766
 (391) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Jackson TN 
 822
 1,427
 
 2,249
 (325) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Amarillo TX 
 590
 2,342
 
 2,932
 (385) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Denton TX 
 832
 2,044
 
 2,876
 (403) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Killeen TX 
 732
 1,935
 
 2,667
 (372) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Lewisville TX 
 1,087
 1,626
 (106) 2,607
 (279) 7/28/2014  1973
Red Lobster McAllen TX 
 960
 1,647
 
 2,607
 (377) 7/28/2014  2010
Red Lobster Harrisonburg VA 
 465
 1,369
 
 1,834
 (321) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster Mt. Pleasant WI 
 856
 1,773
 
 2,629
 (409) 7/28/2014  2012
Red Lobster Huntington WV 
 344
 2,552
 
 2,896
 (459) 7/28/2014  1985
Red Lobster Cheyenne WY 
 1,514
 640
 
 2,154
 (123) 7/28/2014  1992
Red Lobster Ashwaubenon WI 
 1,270
 1,116
 
 2,386
 (231) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Huntsville AL 
 1,098
 2,330
 
 3,428
 (388) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Orland Park IL 
 1,046
 2,489
 
 3,535
 (419) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster West Dundee IL 
 197
 2,195
 
 2,392
 (376) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster Terre Haute IN 
 1,066
 2,640
 
 3,706
 (429) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Monroe LA 
 455
 2,022
 
 2,477
 (389) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Flint MI 
 505
 2,266
 
 2,771
 (391) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Saginaw MI 
 335
 1,961
 
 2,296
 (344) 7/28/2014  1975
Red Lobster Traverse City MI 
 1,036
 1,121
 
 2,157
 (286) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Du Bois PA 
 317
 981
 
 1,298
 (253) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Sumter SC 
 988
 1,117
 
 2,105
 (283) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Aurora IL 
 1,598
 782
 
 2,380
 (177) 7/28/2014  1979

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Krystal Montgomery AL 
 502
 613
 
 1,115
 (203) 4/23/2013 1962
Krystal Scottsboro AL 
 20
 1,157
 172
 1,349
 (307) 6/27/2013 1995
Krystal Tuscaloosa AL 
 206
 1,165
 
 1,371
 (420) 9/21/2012 1976
Krystal Valley AL 
 297
 694
 125
 1,116
 (233) 4/23/2013 1979
Krystal Vestavia Hills AL 
 342
 513
 
 855
 (170) 4/23/2013 1995
Krystal Jacksonville FL 
 574
 574
 
 1,148
 (207) 9/21/2012 1990
Krystal Orlando FL 
 372
 372
 125
 869
 (135) 9/21/2012 1994
Krystal Orlando FL 
 669
 446
 
 1,115
 (161) 9/21/2012 1995
Krystal Plant City FL 
 355
 533
 
 888
 (192) 9/21/2012 2012
Krystal St. Augustine FL 
 411
 411
 125
 947
 (150) 9/21/2012 2012
Krystal Albany GA 
 309
 721
 
 1,030
 (260) 9/21/2012 1962
Krystal Atlanta GA 
 166
 664
 
 830
 (240) 9/21/2012 1973
Krystal Augusta GA 
 365
 851
 
 1,216
 (307) 9/21/2012 1979
Krystal Columbus GA 
 622
 934
 
 1,556
 (337) 9/21/2012 1977
Krystal Decatur GA 
 94
 533
 
 627
 (192) 9/21/2012 1965
Krystal East Point GA 
 221
 664
 
 885
 (238) 10/26/2012 1984
Krystal Macon GA 
 325
 759
 
 1,084
 (274) 9/21/2012 1962
Krystal Milledgeville GA 
 261
 609
 
 870
 (220) 9/21/2012 2011
Krystal Snellville GA 
 466
 466
 
 932
 (168) 9/21/2012 1981
Krystal Corinth MS 
 279
 652
 125
 1,056
 (219) 4/23/2013 2007
Krystal Gulfport MS 
 215
 861
 
 1,076
 (311) 9/21/2012 2011
Krystal Pearl MS 
 426
 638
 
 1,064
 (230) 9/21/2012 1976
Krystal Chattanooga TN 
 336
 784
 
 1,120
 (283) 9/21/2012 2010
Krystal Chattanooga TN 
 186
 328
 
 514
 (56) 6/27/2013 1995
Krystal Chattanooga TN 
 440
 659
 
 1,099
 (219) 4/23/2013 1983
Krystal Knoxville TN 
 369
 246
 
 615
 (89) 9/21/2012 1970
Krystal Lawrenceburg TN 
 304
 709
 
 1,013
 (235) 4/23/2013 1980
Krystal Memphis TN 
 257
 1,029
 
 1,286
 (341) 4/23/2013 1975
Krystal Memphis TN 
 181
 723
 
 904
 (240) 4/23/2013 1972
Krystal Murfreesboro TN 
 465
 698
 
 1,163
 (231) 4/23/2013 2008
Kum & Go Bentonville AR 
 587
 1,370
 (13) 1,944
 (390) 11/20/2012 2009
Kum & Go Lowell AR 
 774
 1,437
 
 2,211
 (409) 11/20/2012 2009

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Matteson IL 
 962
 2,212
 
 3,174
 (360) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Springfield IL 
 1,205
 1,253
 
 2,458
 (259) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Vestal NY 
 1,027
 2,255
 
 3,282
 (387) 7/28/2014  1976
Red Lobster Cincinnati OH 
 1,484
 1,687
 
 3,171
 (280) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Lancaster OH 
 737
 1,570
 
 2,307
 (313) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Youngstown OH 
 214
 2,477
 
 2,691
 (416) 7/28/2014  1982
Red Lobster Chattanooga TN 
 1,548
 2,575
 
 4,123
 (387) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Longview TX 
 324
 2,625
 
 2,949
 (441) 7/28/2014  1981
Red Lobster Novi MI 
 2,061
 1,847
 
 3,908
 (352) 7/28/2014  1983
Red Lobster Cuyahoga Falls OH 
 306
 2,511
 
 2,817
 (397) 7/28/2014  1974
Red Lobster Muskogee OK 
 399
 1,707
 
 2,106
 (356) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Casper WY 
 1,014
 1,337
 
 2,351
 (352) 7/28/2014  2011
Red Lobster Buford GA 
 1,315
 2,638
 
 3,953
 (488) 7/28/2014  2000
Red Lobster Kennesaw GA 
 1,382
 1,802
 
 3,184
 (338) 7/28/2014  1987
Red Lobster Chicago IL 
 1,064
 2,422
 
 3,486
 (404) 7/28/2014  1980
Red Lobster Evansville IN 
 587
 3,357
 
 3,944
 (534) 7/28/2014  1972
Red Lobster Richmond IN 
 371
 1,416
 
 1,787
 (322) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Canton OH 
 398
 2,596
 
 2,994
 (408) 7/28/2014  1974
Red Lobster Mansfield OH 
 335
 1,697
 
 2,032
 (297) 7/28/2014  1977
Red Lobster Rochester NY 
 756
 2,122
 
 2,878
 (412) 7/28/2014  1985
Red Lobster Columbus OH 
 787
 2,123
 
 2,910
 (347) 7/28/2014  1973
Red Lobster Springfield PA 
 1,571
 2,344
 
 3,915
 (437) 7/28/2014  1983
Red Lobster Pittsburgh PA 
 1,641
 1,096
 
 2,737
 (223) 7/28/2014  1987
Bahama Breeze Pittsburgh PA 
 1,590
 1,753
 
 3,343
 (336) 7/28/2014  2004
Olive Garden Pittsburgh PA 
 1,560
 1,422
 
 2,982
 (278) 7/28/2014  2003
Smokey Bones Pittsburgh PA 
 1,490
 390
 
 1,880
 (168) 7/28/2014  2000
Olive Garden Silverdale WA 
 1,752
 2,015
 
 3,767
 (320) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster Silverdale WA 
 1,661
 501
 
 2,162
 (190) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster Salisbury MD 
 1,070
 1,868
 
 2,938
 (381) 7/28/2014  1992
Olive Garden Salisbury MD 
 1,171
 3,144
 
 4,315
 (472) 7/28/2014  1995
Red Lobster Port Charlotte FL 
 1,476
 1,516
 
 2,992
 (319) 7/28/2014  1990
Olive Garden Port Charlotte FL 
 1,454
 4,156
 
 5,610
 (605) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Oklahoma City OK 
 800
 1,960
 
 2,760
 (362) 7/28/2014  1991

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Kum & Go Paragould AR 
 708
 2,123
 
 2,831
 (614) 9/28/2012 2012
Kum & Go Rogers AR 
 668
 1,559
 
 2,227
 (443) 11/20/2012 2008
Kum & Go Sherwood AR 
 866
 1,609
 
 2,475
 (465) 9/28/2012 2012
Kum & Go Fountain CO 
 1,131
 1,696
 
 2,827
 (478) 12/24/2012 2012
Kum & Go Monument CO 
 1,192
 1,457
 
 2,649
 (411) 12/24/2012 2012
Kum & Go Muscatine IA 
 794
 1,853
 
 2,647
 (522) 12/27/2012 2012
Kum & Go Ottumwa IA 
 586
 1,368
 
 1,954
 (389) 11/20/2012 1998
Kum & Go Sloan IA 
 447
 2,162
 
 2,609
 (531) 2/7/2014 2008
Kum & Go Story City IA 
 223
 2,089
 
 2,312
 (457) 2/7/2014 2006
Kum & Go Tipton IA 
 507
 1,945
 
 2,452
 (500) 2/7/2014 2008
Kum & Go Waukee IA 
 1,280
 1,280
 
 2,560
 (344) 3/28/2013 2012
Kum & Go West Branch IA 
 219
 1,089
 
 1,308
 (235) 2/7/2014 1997
Kum & Go Joplin MO 
 218
 782
 
 1,000
 (225) 2/11/2014 1987
Kum & Go Joplin MO 
 205
 594
 
 799
 (173) 2/11/2014 1986
Kum & Go Neosho MO 
 504
 1,144
 
 1,648
 (256) 2/11/2014 1997
Kum & Go Tioga ND 
 318
 2,863
 
 3,181
 (814) 11/8/2012 2012
Kum & Go Muskogee OK 
 423
 1,691
 
 2,114
 (423) 7/22/2013 2013
Kum & Go Muskogee OK 
 97
 973
 
 1,070
 (161) 9/30/2014 1999
Kum & Go Cheyenne WY 
 411
 2,327
 
 2,738
 (656) 12/27/2012 2012
Kum & Go Gillette WY 
 878
 2,048
 
 2,926
 (522) 6/28/2013 2013
L.A. Fitness Avondale AZ 
 2,253
 9,040
 
 11,293
 (1,894) 2/7/2014 2006
L.A. Fitness Glendale AZ 3,093
 2,177
 7,568
 20
 9,765
 (1,721) 2/7/2014 2005
L.A. Fitness Marana AZ 
 1,284
 8,322
 
 9,606
 (1,814) 2/7/2014 2011
L.A. Fitness Highland CA 4,547
 2,274
 8,673
 
 10,947
 (2,010) 2/7/2014 2009
L.A. Fitness Boynton Beach FL 
 1,485
 9,945
 
 11,430
 (334) 11/22/2016 2005
L.A. Fitness Miami FL 
 2,730
 8,671
 
 11,401
 (300) 11/22/2016 2015
L.A. Fitness Tampa FL 
 1,084
 6,500
 
 7,584
 (28) 11/13/2017 2016
L.A. Fitness Broadview IL 
 3,345
 8,763
 276
 12,384
 (1,862) 2/7/2014 2010
L.A. Fitness Oswego IL 
 3,163
 8,749
 
 11,912
 (1,934) 2/7/2014 2008
L.A. Fitness Tinley Park IL 
 1,722
 8,976
 
 10,698
 (10) 12/22/2017 2006
L.A. Fitness Carmel IN 
 1,457
 9,562
 
 11,019
 (2,008) 2/7/2014 2008
L.A. Fitness Indianapolis IN 
 1,279
 8,970
 
 10,249
 (1,884) 2/7/2014 2009

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Olive Garden Oklahoma City OK 
 819
 4,053
 
 4,872
 (594) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Morgantown WV 
 1,252
 1,477
 
 2,729
 (342) 7/28/2014  2009
Olive Garden Morgantown WV 
 1,765
 2,199
 
 3,964
 (432) 7/28/2014  2006
Red Lobster Manassas VA 
 1,800
 941
 
 2,741
 (236) 7/28/2014  1993
Olive Garden Manassas VA 
 1,965
 2,585
 
 4,550
 (395) 7/28/2014  1993
Red Lobster Leesburg FL 
 721
 1,262
 
 1,983
 (290) 7/28/2014  1990
Olive Garden Leesburg FL 
 692
 1,837
 
 2,529
 (289) 7/28/2014  1990
Red Lobster Langhorne PA 
 979
 2,735
 
 3,714
 (506) 7/28/2014  1996
Olive Garden Langhorne PA 
 970
 3,717
 
 4,687
 (544) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Houston TX 
 960
 1,833
 
 2,793
 (323) 7/28/2014  1981
Olive Garden Houston TX 
 973
 2,902
 
 3,875
 (437) 7/28/2014  1994
Red Lobster Flagstaff AZ 
 891
 514
 
 1,405
 (211) 7/28/2014  1996
Olive Garden Flagstaff AZ 
 875
 455
 
 1,330
 (95) 7/28/2014  1996
Red Lobster Chesapeake VA 
 1,262
 1,374
 
 2,636
 (270) 7/28/2014  1992
Olive Garden Chesapeake VA 
 1,382
 2,252
 
 3,634
 (351) 7/28/2014  1991
Red Lobster Cary NC 
 1,933
 1,118
 
 3,051
 (276) 7/28/2014  1992
Olive Garden Cary NC 
 1,545
 6,603
 
 8,148
 (942) 7/28/2014  1992
Red Lobster Altamonte Springs FL 
 1,212
 1,674
 
 2,886
 (325) 7/28/2014  1986
Olive Garden Altamonte Springs FL 
 699
 4,023
 
 4,722
 (670) 7/28/2014  2006
Red Lobster Memphis TN 
 1,602
 2,290
 
 3,892
 (370) 7/28/2014  1972
Bahama Breeze Memphis TN 
 2,370
 1,313
 
 3,683
 (219) 7/28/2014  1998
Red Lobster Jackson MS 
 1,128
 2,851
 
 3,979
 (472) 7/28/2014  1977
Dollar General Galatia IL 
 87
 1,008
 
 1,095
 (221) 7/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Marion AL 
 247
 780
 
 1,027
 (176) 7/30/2014  2014
Red Lobster Branson MO 
 1,496
 1,074
 
 2,570
 (201) 7/30/2014  2000
Red Lobster Mentor OH 
 651
 2,129
 
 2,780
 (361) 7/30/2014  1977
Red Lobster Sandusky OH 
 1,290
 1,126
 
 2,416
 (248) 7/30/2014  1986
Red Lobster Abilene TX 
 209
 1,976
 
 2,185
 (346) 7/30/2014  1980
Dollar General Rensselaer IN 
 111
 957
 
 1,068
 (240) 7/30/2014  2014
Dollar General Medaryville IN 
 96
 914
 
 1,010
 (334) 7/31/2014  2014
Dollar General Park Forest IL 
 390
 1,036
 
 1,426
 (219) 8/1/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Blackhawk SD 
 115
 585
 
 700
 (139) 8/6/2014  2006
Dollar General Bronson MI 
 97
 436
 
 533
 (257) 8/6/2014  1965

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
L.A. Fitness St. Clair Shores MI 
 2,163
 6,787
 
 8,950
 (254) 11/22/2016 1982
L.A. Fitness Oakdale MN 4,749
 2,315
 8,315
 
 10,630
 (1,821) 2/7/2014 2009
L.A. Fitness Webster NY 
 2,922
 5,102
 
 8,024
 (62) 8/1/2017 2014
L.A. Fitness Edmond OK 
 962
 6,916
 
 7,878
 (1,320) 3/31/2014 2014
L.A. Fitness Easton PA 
 938
 10,600
 152
 11,690
 (2,237) 2/7/2014 1979
L.A. Fitness Dallas TX 4,712
 2,629
 10,413
 
 13,042
 (2,079) 2/7/2014 2008
L.A. Fitness Denton TX 3,831
 1,888
 9,568
 (6) 11,450
 (1,966) 2/7/2014 2009
L.A. Fitness Duncanville TX 
 1,538
 10,023
 
 11,561
 (2,025) 2/7/2014 2007
L.A. Fitness Mckinney TX 
 2,039
 7,787
 
 9,826
 (273) 11/22/2016 2005
L.A. Fitness Rowlett TX 
 2,539
 7,668
 6
 10,213
 (163) 4/11/2017 2006
L.A. Fitness Spring TX 
 1,970
 9,290
 
 11,260
 (1,903) 2/7/2014 2006
Lamrite West Strongsville OH 
 3,078
 34,076
 
 37,154
 (338) 8/21/2017 1999
Leeann Chin Blaine MN 
 480
 528
 
 1,008
 (130) 6/27/2013 1995
Leeann Chin Chanhassen MN 
 450
 763
 
 1,213
 (189) 6/27/2013 1995
Leeann Chin Golden Valley MN 
 270
 776
 
 1,046
 (192) 6/27/2013 1995
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken Florissant MO 
 306
 560
 
 866
 (141) 6/27/2013 1984
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken St. Ann MO 
 187
 571
 
 758
 (144) 6/27/2013 1984
Lee's Famous Recipe Chicken St. Louis MO 
 107
 874
 
 981
 (220) 6/27/2013 1984
Logan's Roadhouse Huntsville AL 
 520
 4,797
 (1,363) 3,954
 (573) 6/27/2013 1995
Logan's Roadhouse Fayetteville AR 
 1,570
 2,182
 (953) 2,799
 (251) 6/27/2013 1995
Logan's Roadhouse Hattiesburg MS 
 890
 4,012
 (803) 4,099
 (533) 6/27/2013 1995
Logan's Roadhouse Owasso OK 
 1,449
 2,173
 (568) 3,054
 (291) 7/31/2013 2006
Logan's Roadhouse Clarksville TN 
 1,010
 4,424
 (1,264) 4,170
 (540) 6/27/2013 1995
Logan's Roadhouse Cleveland TN 
 890
 3,902
 (1,225) 3,567
 (462) 6/27/2013 1995
Logan's Roadhouse El Paso TX 
 320
 4,731
 (1,558) 3,493
 (528) 6/27/2013 1995
Long John Silver's / A&W Merced CA 
 174
 695
 
 869
 (163) 7/31/2013 1982
Long John Silver's / A&W Collinsville IL 
 220
 940
 
 1,160
 (237) 6/27/2013 2006
Long John Silver's / A&W Fairview Heights IL 
 258
 525
 
 783
 (132) 6/27/2013 1976
Long John Silver's / A&W Jacksonville IL 
 171
 431
 
 602
 (109) 6/27/2013 1978
Long John Silver's / A&W Litchfield IL 
 194
 996
 
 1,190
 (251) 6/27/2013 1986

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Winter Haven FL 
 534
 942
 
 1,476
 (144) 8/8/2014  2014
Dollar General Headland AL 
 387
 1,091
 
 1,478
 (266) 8/13/2014  2014
Dollar General Shiloh GA 
 150
 743
 
 893
 (268) 8/13/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Jeffersonville GA 
 153
 926
 
 1,079
 (206) 8/15/2014  2014
DJO Global Vista CA 
 3,732
 16,868
 
 20,600
 (12,645) 8/15/2014  2006
Mattress Firm Flint MI 
 467
 1,323
 
 1,790
 (325) 8/19/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Clearwater FL 
 425
 1,006
 
 1,431
 (219) 8/22/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Zellwood FL 
 272
 1,005
 
 1,277
 (220) 8/22/2014  2014
ifm efector Malvern PA 
 1,816
 
 9,747
 11,563
 (1,523) 8/27/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cortland OH 
 188
 963
 
 1,151
 (220) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pearl MS 
 342
 1,001
 
 1,343
 (223) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Donna TX 
 194
 855
 
 1,049
 (197) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lexington TN 
 323
 838
 
 1,161
 (191) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Liberty NC 
 243
 802
 
 1,045
 (182) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ore City TX 
 27
 744
 
 771
 (170) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Detroit MI 
 110
 1,051
 
 1,161
 (247) 8/28/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 303
 712
 
 1,015
 (185) 8/28/2014  2004
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hamilton OH 
 131
 1,215
 
 1,346
 (266) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mulberry FL 
 131
 1,156
 
 1,287
 (256) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bowling Green KY 
 334
 951
 
 1,285
 (213) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Seadrift TX 
 51
 832
 
 883
 (188) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Pensacola FL 
 69
 1,085
 
 1,154
 (237) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Auburndale FL 
 314
 951
 
 1,265
 (213) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Richland GA 
 125
 859
 
 984
 (195) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar El Dorado AR 
 151
 806
 
 957
 (212) 8/28/2014  1988
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Sonora TX 
 49
 548
 
 597
 (151) 8/28/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Acworth GA 
 489
 901
 
 1,390
 (206) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Avondale LA 
 381
 1,255
 
 1,636
 (281) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Monroe MI 
 243
 1,061
 
 1,304
 (240) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Wirtz VA 
 148
 919
 
 1,067
 (208) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Canton MS 
 210
 1,142
 
 1,352
 (256) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lancaster SC 
 249
 725
 
 974
 (168) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ash Fork AZ 
 123
 1,015
 
 1,138
 (228) 8/28/2014  2013

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Long John Silver's / A&W Marion IL 
 305
 1,059
 
 1,364
 (267) 6/27/2013 1983
Long John Silver's / A&W Mount Carmel IL 
 105
 484
 
 589
 (122) 6/27/2013 1977
Long John Silver's / A&W Vandalia IL 
 101
 484
 
 585
 (122) 6/27/2013 1976
Long John Silver's / A&W West Frankfort IL 
 244
 996
 
 1,240
 (251) 6/27/2013 1977
Long John Silver's / A&W Wood River IL 
 251
 314
 
 565
 (79) 6/27/2013 1975
Long John Silver's / A&W Garden City KS 
 120
 530
 
 650
 (133) 6/27/2013 1978
Long John Silver's / A&W Hays KS 
 160
 624
 
 784
 (157) 6/27/2013 1994
Long John Silver's / A&W Clovis NM 
 210
 705
 (377) 538
 (40) 6/27/2013 1995
Long John Silver's / A&W Fairborn OH 
 103
 300
 
 403
 (75) 6/27/2013 1976
Long John Silver's / A&W Penn Hills PA 
 438
 656
 
 1,094
 (154) 7/31/2013 1993
Long John Silver's / A&W Austin TX 
 459
 477
 
 936
 (120) 6/27/2013 1993
Long John Silver's / KFC Green Bay WI 
 748
 563
 
 1,311
 (142) 6/27/2013 1978
Long John Silver's / Taco Bell Ashtabula OH 
 440
 1,640
 
 2,080
 (405) 6/27/2013 1995
Longhorn Steakhouse Tampa FL 
 370
 1,852
 
 2,222
 (473) 6/27/2013 1995
Longhorn Steakhouse Paducah KY 
 1,121
 1,443
 (2,072) 492
 (2) 2/7/2014 1995
Los Tios Mexican Restaurant Dalton OH 
 18
 30
 
 48
 (8) 6/27/2013 1990
Lowe's Jonesboro AR 
 2,101
 8,405
 185
 10,691
 (1,567) 5/19/2014 1994
Lowe's Burlington IA 
 2,775
 8,191
 819
 11,785
 (1,527) 2/7/2014 1996
Lowe's Florence KY 
 4,814
 10,189
 250
 15,253
 (1,877) 2/7/2014 1997
Lowe's New Orleans LA 13,069
 10,315
 20,728
 
 31,043
 (4,268) 11/5/2013 2005
Lowe's Sanford ME 4,672
 4,045
 
 
 4,045
 
 2/7/2014 2009
Lowe's Windham ME 7,930
 12,640
 
 
 12,640
 
 6/3/2013 2006
Lowe's Benton Harbor MI 
 1,011
 7,851
 245
 9,107
 (1,517) 3/17/2014 1994
Lowe's Kansas City MO 
 3,729
 
 
 3,729
 
 2/7/2014 2009
Lowe's Las Vegas NV 
 11,499
 
 
 11,499
 
 2/7/2014 2002
Lowe's Ticonderoga NY 4,345
 1,812
 
 
 1,812
 
 2/7/2014 2009
Lowe's West Carrollton OH 6,375
 2,864
 9,883
 
 12,747
 (1,715) 2/7/2014 1994
Lowe's Columbia SC 
 5,485
 
 
 5,485
 
 2/7/2014 1994
Lowe's Texas City TX 
 2,313
 9,253
 
 11,566
 (2,336) 5/19/2014 1995
Lube Stop Akron OH 
 79
 287
 
 366
 (44) 9/2/2014 1988
Lube Stop Akron OH 
 135
 761
 
 896
 (120) 9/2/2014 1995
Lube Stop Akron OH 
 205
 1,043
 
 1,248
 (161) 9/2/2014 1992

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Orlando FL 
 349
 1,294
 
 1,643
 (283) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Golden Valley AZ 
 110
 772
 
 882
 (204) 8/28/2014  2001
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Woodruff SC 
 229
 1,125
 
 1,354
 (248) 8/28/2014  2010
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Blooming Grove TX 
 70
 753
 
 823
 (173) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Marietta GA 
 582
 1,126
 
 1,708
 (252) 8/28/2014  2013
DNU Beverly Hills FL 
 409
 965
 
 1,374
 (218) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Phoenix AZ 
 416
 1,229
 
 1,645
 (270) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Oklahoma City OK 
 390
 990
 
 1,380
 (224) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Philadelphia MS 
 53
 897
 
 950
 (205) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hiddenite NC 
 221
 832
 
 1,053
 (190) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Rockholds KY 
 121
 988
 
 1,109
 (228) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Natchez MS 
 289
 749
 
 1,038
 (223) 8/28/2014  1982
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Nashville TN 
 334
 1,275
 
 1,609
 (312) 8/28/2014  1976
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Durant OK 
 164
 1,223
 
 1,387
 (287) 8/28/2014  2000
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Westwego LA 
 332
 1,052
 
 1,384
 (241) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lindale GA 
 227
 966
 
 1,193
 (220) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Macon GA 
 300
 893
 
 1,193
 (203) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar McAllen TX 
 445
 896
 
 1,341
 (202) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Bunnell FL 
 188
 936
 
 1,124
 (214) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mitchell IN 
 101
 1,119
 
 1,220
 (258) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Carlisle KY 
 157
 871
 
 1,028
 (200) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Piney Flats TN 
 200
 953
 
 1,153
 (216) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Dayton OH 
 107
 899
 
 1,006
 (258) 8/28/2014  1940
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ocala FL 
 108
 816
 
 924
 (194) 8/28/2014  2005
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Drew MS 
 11
 1,039
 
 1,050
 (276) 8/28/2014  1989
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Orlando FL 
 291
 1,286
 
 1,577
 (281) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Canal Winchester OH 
 218
 1,116
 
 1,334
 (248) 8/28/2014  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hickory NC 
 215
 785
 
 1,000
 (179) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Burlington NC 
 291
 694
 
 985
 (159) 8/28/2014  2012
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Alton TX 
 134
 908
 
 1,042
 (204) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Refugio TX 
 110
 982
 
 1,092
 (219) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fountain FL 
 202
 825
 
 1,027
 (188) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Duncan AZ 
 98
 895
 
 993
 (201) 8/28/2014  2013

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Lube Stop Bedford Heights OH 
 156
 529
 
 685
 (89) 9/2/2014 1986
Lube Stop Cleveland OH 
 127
 559
 
 686
 (86) 9/2/2014 1988
Lube Stop Fairview Park OH 
 205
 179
 
 384
 (41) 9/2/2014 1988
Lube Stop Lakewood OH 
 205
 765
 
 970
 (121) 9/2/2014 1993
Lube Stop Mayfield Heights OH 
 201
 430
 
 631
 (71) 9/2/2014 1988
Lube Stop Medina OH 
 135
 414
 (5) 544
 (70) 9/2/2014 1995
Lube Stop N. Barberton OH 
 140
 502
 
 642
 (77) 9/2/2014 1998
Lube Stop Painesville OH 
 276
 208
 
 484
 (43) 9/2/2014 1988
Lube Stop Parma OH 
 124
 390
 
 514
 (58) 9/2/2014 1986
Lube Stop Parma OH 
 306
 502
 
 808
 (86) 9/2/2014 1986
Lube Stop Seven Hills OH 
 182
 201
 
 383
 (39) 9/2/2014 1987
Lube Stop Solon OH 
 233
 487
 
 720
 (78) 9/2/2014 1992
Lube Stop South Euclid OH 
 109
 561
 
 670
 (80) 9/2/2014 1986
Lube Stop Stow OH 
 230
 132
 
 362
 (28) 9/2/2014 1988
Lube Stop Westlake OH 
 85
 525
 
 610
 (74) 9/2/2014 1999
Lube Stop Willoughby OH 
 168
 425
 
 593
 (66) 9/2/2014 1986
Lumber Liquidators Saginaw MI 
 287
 502
 
 789
 (101) 5/28/2014 2000
Mars Petcare Columbia SC 
 1,875
 19,591
 (987) 20,479
 (2,878) 11/5/2013 2014
Mastec Houston TX 
 369
 2,669
 
 3,038
 (435) 6/12/2014 2012
Mattress Firm Daphne AL 
 528
 1,233
 
 1,761
 (291) 10/1/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Dothan AL 
 406
 1,217
 
 1,623
 (316) 5/14/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Rogers AR 
 321
 1,284
 
 1,605
 (351) 2/6/2013 2012
Mattress Firm Destin FL 
 693
 1,287
 
 1,980
 (328) 6/5/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Melbourne FL 
 405
 1,237
 
 1,642
 (259) 2/7/2014 2011
Mattress Firm Tallahassee FL 
 924
 1,386
 
 2,310
 (360) 5/14/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Boise ID 
 335
 1,339
 
 1,674
 (367) 2/22/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Garden City ID 
 492
 1,305
 
 1,797
 (257) 2/26/2014 2003
Mattress Firm Fairview Heights IL 
 231
 958
 
 1,189
 (219) 2/7/2014 1977
Mattress Firm Columbus IN 
 157
 891
 
 1,048
 (253) 11/6/2012 1964
Mattress Firm Evansville IN 
 117
 2,227
 
 2,344
 (610) 2/11/2013 1995
Mattress Firm Goshen IN 
 211
 1,555
 
 1,766
 (301) 3/20/2014 2013
Mattress Firm Mishawaka IN 
 375
 1,500
 
 1,875
 (376) 7/30/2013 2013
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Alma GA 
 79
 954
 
 1,033
 (213) 8/28/2014  1982
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Wichita KS 
 216
 1,035
 
 1,251
 (229) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Millbrook AL 
 316
 1,052
 
 1,368
 (236) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar La Pryor TX 
 74
 817
 
 891
 (185) 8/28/2014  2013
DNU Boiling Springs NC 
 322
 767
 
 1,089
 (169) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Asheboro NC 
 251
 932
 
 1,183
 (216) 8/28/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Montgomery AL 
 218
 847
 
 1,065
 (191) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Citra FL 
 47
 1,038
 
 1,085
 (231) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Sabinal TX 
 35
 952
 
 987
 (212) 8/28/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Dayton OH 
 129
 618
 
 747
 (164) 8/28/2014  2002
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cincinnati OH 
 221
 1,055
 
 1,276
 (254) 8/28/2014  2001
DNU Huntsville AL 
 476
 1,092
 
 1,568
 (238) 8/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Hoover AL 
 368
 1,153
 
 1,521
 (262) 8/29/2014  2014
Take 5 Oil Change N. Barberton OH 
 140
 502
 
 642
 (120) 9/2/2014  1998
Take 5 Oil Change Akron OH 
 79
 287
 
 366
 (69) 9/2/2014  1988
Take 5 Oil Change Akron OH 
 135
 761
 
 896
 (189) 9/2/2014  1995
Take 5 Oil Change Fairview Park OH 
 205
 179
 
 384
 (65) 9/2/2014  1988
Take 5 Oil Change Mayfield Heights OH 
 201
 430
 
 631
 (112) 9/2/2014  1988
Take 5 Oil Change Bedford Heights OH 
 156
 529
 
 685
 (140) 9/2/2014  1986
Take 5 Oil Change Painesville OH 
 276
 208
 
 484
 (67) 9/2/2014  1988
Take 5 Oil Change Westlake OH 
 85
 525
 
 610
 (117) 9/2/2014  1999
Take 5 Oil Change Parma OH 
 124
 390
 
 514
 (91) 9/2/2014  1986
Take 5 Oil Change Parma OH 
 306
 502
 
 808
 (135) 9/2/2014  1986
Take 5 Oil Change Lakewood OH 
 205
 765
 
 970
 (190) 9/2/2014  1993
Take 5 Oil Change Akron OH 
 205
 1,043
 
 1,248
 (253) 9/2/2014  1992
Take 5 Oil Change Cleveland OH 
 127
 559
 
 686
 (136) 9/2/2014  1988
Take 5 Oil Change Seven Hills OH 
 182
 201
 
 383
 (61) 9/2/2014  1987
Take 5 Oil Change Solon OH 
 233
 487
 
 720
 (123) 9/2/2014  1992
Take 5 Oil Change Medina OH 
 135
 414
 (5) 544
 (110) 9/2/2014  1995
Take 5 Oil Change South Euclid OH 
 109
 561
 
 670
 (126) 9/2/2014  1986
Take 5 Oil Change Stow OH 
 230
 132
 
 362
 (45) 9/2/2014  1988



F-168


        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Take 5 Oil Change Willoughby OH 
 168
 425
 
 593
 (104) 9/2/2014  1986
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar St. Matthews SC 
 175
 828
 
 1,003
 (187) 9/3/2014  2014
Archrock Fort Worth TX 
 1,360
 5,704
 
 7,064
 (1,404) 9/5/2014  2011
FedEx Marcy NY 
 339
 5,795
 
 6,134
 (2,363) 9/5/2014  2006
Dollar General Schneider IN 
 124
 1,010
 
 1,134
 (225) 9/17/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Parkton NC 
 164
 894
 
 1,058
 (199) 9/19/2014  2014
Dollar General Bainbridge IN 
 131
 765
 
 896
 (174) 9/22/2014  2010
AT&T Schaumburg IL 
 2,364
 9,305
 775
 12,444
 (2,901) 9/24/2014  1989
Keane Frac Pleasanton TX 
 328
 4,804
 (2,858) 2,274
 (343) 9/25/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Riverdale GA 
 310
 1,188
 
 1,498
 (258) 9/26/2014  2014
Dollar General Cullman AL 
 221
 861
 
 1,082
 (200) 9/26/2014  2014
Circle K Thomson GA 
 637
 340
 
 977
 (104) 9/26/2014  1990
Circle K Martinez GA 
 293
 329
 
 622
 (97) 9/26/2014  1993
Ashley Furniture HomeStore Jeffersontown KY 
 1,966
 2,368
 
 4,334
 (710) 9/26/2014  1970
Sunbelt Rentals Memphis TN 
 365
 929
 128
 1,422
 (275) 9/26/2014  1995
Dollar General Bremen AL 
 59
 1,017
 
 1,076
 (259) 9/29/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Manning SC 
 313
 960
 
 1,273
 (215) 9/30/2014  2014
Owens & Minor Cleveland OH 
 755
 6,077
 (4) 6,828
 (1,547) 9/30/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Anaconda MT 
 164
 1,058
 
 1,222
 (251) 9/30/2014  2014
DaVita Dialysis New Orleans LA 
 511
 2,237
 
 2,748
 (474) 9/30/2014  2010
Kum & Go Muskogee OK 
 97
 973
 
 1,070
 (255) 9/30/2014  1999
Mattress Firm Flint MI 
 409
 1,164
 
 1,573
 (253) 10/3/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Weatherford TX 
 218
 1,057
 (5) 1,270
 (258) 10/10/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Parker SD 
 117
 828
 1
 946
 (213) 10/10/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar New Britain CT 
 484
 1,280
 26
 1,790
 (281) 10/14/2014  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Keota OK 
 279
 872
 
 1,151
 (195) 10/16/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Anthony FL 
 242
 1,037
 
 1,279
 (245) 10/30/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kansas CIty KS 
 290
 1,170
 (5) 1,455
 (258) 11/6/2014  2014
Advance Auto Parts Brooklyn CT 
 324
 1,429
 
 1,753
 (297) 11/7/2014  2006
SCP Distributors Knoxville TN 
 251
 900
 191
 1,342
 (247) 11/20/2014  1970
SCP Distributors North Little Rock AR 
 258
 1,665
 (9) 1,914
 (372) 11/20/2014  2006
Dollar General Oceana WV 
 317
 1,023
 
 1,340
 (235) 11/20/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fayetteville GA 
 217
 1,203
 
 1,420
 (255) 11/20/2014  2014

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Mattress Firm South Bend IN 
 289
 2,445
 
 2,734
 (486) 2/24/2014 2013
Mattress Firm Bowling Green KY 
 648
 973
 
 1,621
 (257) 4/25/2013 2012
Mattress Firm Lafayette LA 1,194
 
 1,251
 
 1,251
 (325) 5/2/2013 1995
Mattress Firm Flint MI 
 467
 1,323
 
 1,790
 (210) 8/19/2014 2014
Mattress Firm Flint MI 
 409
 1,164
 
 1,573
 (159) 10/3/2014 2014
Mattress Firm Goldsboro NC 
 349
 1,385
 
 1,734
 (215) 5/29/2014 2014
Mattress Firm Greenville NC 
 1,085
 1,085
 
 2,170
 (306) 12/12/2012 2012
Mattress Firm Raleigh NC 
 1,091
 1,091
 
 2,182
 (315) 9/28/2012 1997
Mattress Firm Wilmington NC 
 412
 1,257
 
 1,669
 (341) 3/29/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Wilson NC 
 373
 692
 
 1,065
 (200) 9/28/2012 2012
Mattress Firm Painesville OH 
 437
 1,318
 
 1,755
 (222) 7/10/2014 2014
Mattress Firm Johnstown PA 
 389
 906
 745
 2,040
 (198) 7/31/2013 1995
Mattress Firm Florence SC 
 398
 929
 (8) 1,319
 (261) 12/7/2012 2012
Mattress Firm Rock Hill SC 
 385
 898
 
 1,283
 (221) 8/21/2013 2008
Mattress Firm Knoxville TN 
 586
 1,088
 
 1,674
 (293) 3/19/2013 2012
Mattress Firm Nederland TX 
 311
 1,245
 
 1,556
 (360) 9/26/2012 1997
Mattress Firm Bountiful UT 
 736
 1,367
 
 2,103
 (385) 12/31/2012 2012
Mattress Firm Spokane WA 
 409
 1,685
 
 2,094
 (453) 4/4/2013 2013
Mattress Firm Spokane WA 
 511
 1,582
 
 2,093
 (434) 3/28/2013 2013
McAlisters Murfreesboro TN 
 310
 720
 
 1,030
 (184) 6/27/2013 1995
McAlisters Sherman TX 
 563
 1,223
 
 1,786
 (254) 5/16/2014 2013
McAlisters Waco TX 
 429
 791
 
 1,220
 (188) 3/27/2014 2000
McDonald's Scotland Neck NC 
 320
 
 
 320
 
 6/27/2013 2005
MDC Holdings Inc. Denver CO 
 12,648
 66,398
 397
 79,443
 (14,281) 11/5/2013 2001
MedAssets Plano TX 
 10,432
 45,650
 
 56,082
 (7,870) 2/7/2014 2013
The Medicines Co. Parsippany NJ 27,700
 5,150
 50,051
 523
 55,724
 (8,992) 2/7/2014 2009
Melrose Park Center Melrose Park IL 
 6,143
 10,515
 597
 17,255
 (2,113) 2/7/2014 2006
Mercer Well Services Cleburne TX 
 262
 369
 
 631
 (66) 6/25/2014 2008
Merrill Lynch Hopewell NJ 74,250
 17,619
 108,349
 (12,141) 113,827
 (9,953) 2/7/2014 2001
Metro PCS Richardson TX 7,655
 1,292
 19,606
 769
 21,667
 (4,180) 11/5/2013 1986
Mezcal Mexican Restaurant Grafton OH 
 64
 191
 
 255
 (51) 7/31/2013 1990
Michael's Lancaster CA 
 7,744
 33,872
 
 41,616
 (122) 11/20/2017 1998

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lancaster NH 
 456
 1,294
 (2) 1,748
 (287) 12/12/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Kansas CIty KS 
 352
 1,026
 (1) 1,377
 (230) 12/18/2014  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Cloudcroft NM 
 184
 1,344
 
 1,528
 (312) 12/18/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Omaha NE 
 141
 1,159
 4
 1,304
 (282) 12/18/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Omaha NE 
 196
 1,334
 
 1,530
 (341) 12/19/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lake Alfred FL 
 484
 1,006
 
 1,490
 (189) 12/23/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Stratford NJ 
 378
 1,511
 (173) 1,716
 (281) 12/31/2014  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Ennis MT 
 246
 
 773
 1,019
 (215) 1/8/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Huntsville AL 
 628
 924
 
 1,552
 (193) 1/12/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Columbia SC 
 489
 943
 
 1,432
 (194) 2/3/2015  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Waterflow NM 
 175
 
 1,294
 1,469
 (189) 2/5/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Broaddus TX 
 75
 
 921
 996
 (205) 2/6/2015  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Springer NM 
 106
 
 1,198
 1,304
 (245) 2/11/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Arlington TX 
 425
 
 1,112
 1,537
 (97) 2/13/2015  2017
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar North SC 
 193
 979
 
 1,172
 (203) 2/23/2015  2013
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar El Reno OK 
 225
 
 968
 1,193
 (229) 3/2/2015  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Carrizozo NM 
 250
 
 1,113
 1,363
 (228) 3/6/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Whitehall MT 
 132
 
 1,064
 1,196
 (293) 3/19/2015  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Wolcott NY 
 197
 1,193
 
 1,390
 (266) 3/25/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Tyndall SD 
 72
 
 1,072
 1,144
 (214) 3/31/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Wilmington DE 
 540
 1,218
 
 1,758
 (252) 4/21/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Lemmon SD 
 140
 
 1,021
 1,161
 (183) 5/1/2015  2015
FedEx Rapid City SD 
 305
 2,741
 4,583
 7,629
 (1,693) 5/8/2015  2007
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar McLaughlin SD 
 35
 
 1,093
 1,128
 (188) 5/12/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Oklahoma City OK 
 403
 
 988
 1,391
 (186) 5/15/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Belen NM 
 350
 
 969
 1,319
 (214) 5/29/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mesquite TX 
 426
 
 1,146
 1,572
 (227) 5/29/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Logan NM 
 80
 
 1,147
 1,227
 (218) 5/29/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mesquite TX 
 1,460
 
 (183) 1,277
 (213) 7/9/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Poteau OK 
 310
 
 925
 1,235
 (187) 8/7/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Worth TX 
 276
 935
 
 1,211
 (176) 8/21/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Mesquite TX 
 1,414
 
 (8) 1,406
 (212) 9/1/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Velarde NM 
 183
 
 1,122
 1,305
 (223) 9/2/2015  2015

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Michael's Lafayette LA 
 1,831
 3,631
 
 5,462
 (834) 2/7/2014 2011
Michelin Louisville KY 
 1,120
 7,763
 15
 8,898
 (1,953) 11/5/2013 2011
Millenium Chem Glen Burnie MD 
 2,127
 23,198
 (3,894) 21,431
 (1,778) 2/21/2014 1984
Miraca Life Sciences Irving TX 
 3,237
 37,297
 341
 40,875
 (7,129) 4/28/2014 1997
Mister Car Wash Florence AL 
 198
 1,376
 
 1,574
 (8) 10/17/2017 2008
Mister Car Wash Florence AL 
 404
 1,605
 
 2,009
 (12) 10/17/2017 2016
Mister Car Wash Muscle Shoals AL 
 378
 1,445
 
 1,823
 (9) 10/17/2017 2008
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 662
 777
 
 1,439
 (14) 5/16/2017 2002
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 779
 1,600
 
 2,379
 (32) 4/18/2017 2001
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 721
 996
 
 1,717
 (17) 5/16/2017 1984
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 458
 938
 
 1,396
 (17) 5/16/2017 1961
Mister Car Wash Kentwood MI 
 238
 877
 
 1,115
 (16) 5/16/2017 1979
Monro Muffler Lewiston ME 
 279
 1,115
 
 1,394
 (299) 5/10/2013 1976
Monro Muffler Waukesha WI 
 228
 684
 
 912
 (177) 7/23/2013 2002
Monterey's Tex Mex Tulsa OK 
 135
 406
 (326) 215
 (13) 7/31/2013 2001
MotoMart St. Charles MO 
 1,085
 1,980
 
 3,065
 (473) 2/7/2014 2009
MS Energy Service Midland TX 
 1,165
 948
 
 2,113
 (167) 6/12/2014 2012
My Dentist Chickasha OK 
 100
 186
 
 286
 (49) 6/27/2013 1995
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 33
 
 
 33
 
 7/31/2013 1995
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 63
 
 
 63
 
 7/31/2013 1995
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 73
 
 
 73
 
 7/31/2013 1995
N/A - Billboard Memphis TN 
 90
 
 
 90
 
 7/31/2013 1995
N/A - Parking Lot Kingston PA 
 29
 
 
 29
 
 6/27/2013 1995
National Tire & Battery St. Louis MO 
 756
 924
 
 1,680
 (275) 10/31/2012 1998
National Tire & Battery Nashville TN 799
 603
 1,373
 
 1,976
 (268) 2/7/2014 1978
Natural Grocers Gilbert AZ 
 2,113
 3,211
 
 5,324
 (78) 3/1/2017 2016
Natural Grocers Gilbert AZ 
 2,100
 3,231
 
 5,331
 (79) 3/1/2017 2016
Natural Grocers Tucson AZ 
 1,571
 3,637
 
 5,208
 (101) 3/1/2017 2016
Natural Grocers Salem OR 
 1,339
 3,886
 
 5,225
 (808) 2/7/2014 2013
Nestle Holdings Breinigsville PA 
 7,381
 66,948
 
 74,329
 (16,846) 11/5/2013 1994
Northern Tool & Equipment Ocala FL 1,598
 1,693
 2,727
 
 4,420
 (567) 2/7/2014 2008
Northrop Grumman El Segundo CA 
 15,935
 67,908
 
 83,843
 (11,640) 6/27/2014 1972

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Geary OK 
 167
 882
 
 1,049
 (164) 10/14/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Porum OK 
 18
 
 995
 1,013
 (197) 11/5/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Industry TX 
 190
 
 902
 1,092
 (199) 11/9/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Arlington TX 
 300
 
 1,059
 1,359
 (189) 12/4/2015  1995
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Balch Springs TX 
 318
 
 1,208
 1,526
 (210) 12/11/2015  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Raytown MO 
 415
 
 1,287
 1,702
 (266) 12/23/2015  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Texhoma OK 
 150
 
 911
 1,061
 (160) 2/24/2016  2015
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Three Forks MT 
 250
 
 953
 1,203
 (179) 3/3/2016  2014
Dollar Tree/Family Dollar Fort Worth TX 
 350
 
 1,015
 1,365
 (163) 3/31/2016  2015
LA Fitness Boynton Beach FL 
 1,485
 9,945
 
 11,430
 (927) 11/22/2016  2005
LA Fitness Miami FL 
 2,730
 8,671
 
 11,401
 (833) 11/22/2016  2015
LA Fitness McKinney TX 
 2,039
 7,787
 
 9,826
 (759) 11/22/2016  2005
LA Fitness St. Clair Shores MI 
 2,163
 6,787
 
 8,950
 (706) 11/22/2016  1982
Floor & Decor McDonough GA 
 1,859
 7,711
 
 9,570
 (725) 12/13/2016  2015
At Home Florence KY 
 6,794
 5,968
 
 12,762
 (1,085) 12/14/2016  1992
Academy Sports + Outdoors Johnson City TN 
 1,902
 6,440
 
 8,342
 (594) 12/19/2016  2015
Best Buy Findlay OH 
 3,313
 37,568
 2,750
 43,631
 (3,079) 2/15/2017  1996
Natural Grocers Gilbert AZ 
 2,113
 3,211
 
 5,324
 (276) 3/1/2017  2016
Natural Grocers Gilbert AZ 
 2,100
 3,231
 
 5,331
 (278) 3/1/2017  2016
Natural Grocers Tucson AZ 
 1,571
 3,637
 
 5,208
 (355) 3/1/2017  2016
SuperAmerica Waite Park MN 
 316
 333
 
 649
 (31) 3/27/2017  1999
SuperAmerica St. Cloud MN 
 126
 151
 
 277
 (15) 3/27/2017  1968
SuperAmerica St. Cloud MN 
 330
 365
 
 695
 (36) 3/27/2017  1984
SuperAmerica Waite Park MN 
 770
 503
 1
 1,274
 (48) 3/27/2017  1999
SuperAmerica St. Cloud MN 
 104
 136
 
 240
 (13) 3/27/2017  1922
SuperAmerica St. Cloud MN 
 582
 657
 
 1,239
 (66) 3/27/2017  1987
SuperAmerica Sartell MN 
 718
 486
 1
 1,205
 (44) 3/27/2017  2000
SuperAmerica Sauk Rapids MN 
 419
 753
 
 1,172
 (71) 3/27/2017  1997
SuperAmerica Pierz MN 
 67
 411
 
 478
 (39) 3/27/2017  1996
SuperAmerica St. Cloud MN 
 361
 433
 1
 795
 (43) 3/27/2017  1987
SuperAmerica Foley MN 
 72
 276
 
 348
 (27) 3/27/2017  1984
SuperAmerica Pequot Lakes MN 
 158
 1,489
 
 1,647
 (149) 3/27/2017  1983
LA Fitness Rowlett TX 
 2,539
 7,668
 406
 10,613
 (663) 4/11/2017  2006

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
NTT Data Lincoln NE 
 2,812
 25,566
 
 28,378
 (4,640) 2/7/2014 2009
NTW Morrow GA 
 397
 1,586
 
 1,983
 (491) 6/5/2012 1992
O'Charley's Dalton GA 
 406
 1,817
 
 2,223
 (473) 6/27/2013 1993
O'Charley's Tucker GA 
 1,037
 866
 
 1,903
 (225) 6/27/2013 1993
Old Country Buffet Burbank CA 
 246
 1,309
 (1,094) 461
 (71) 1/8/2014 2001
Old Country Buffet Fresno CA 
 326
 1,306
 (1,282) 350
 (57) 1/8/2014 2003
Olive Garden Flagstaff AZ 
 875
 455
 
 1,330
 (62) 7/28/2014 1996
Olive Garden Altamonte Springs FL 
 699
 4,023
 
 4,722
 (432) 7/28/2014 2006
Olive Garden Leesburg FL 
 692
 1,837
 
 2,529
 (185) 7/28/2014 1990
Olive Garden Port Charlotte FL 
 1,454
 4,156
 
 5,610
 (385) 7/28/2014 1990
Olive Garden Salisbury MD 
 1,171
 3,144
 
 4,315
 (301) 7/28/2014 1995
Olive Garden Cary NC 
 1,545
 6,603
 
 8,148
 (598) 7/28/2014 1992
Olive Garden Oklahoma City OK 
 819
 4,053
 
 4,872
 (378) 7/28/2014 1991
Olive Garden Langhorne PA 
 970
 3,717
 
 4,687
 (346) 7/28/2014 1996
Olive Garden Pittsburgh PA 
 1,560
 1,422
 
 2,982
 (181) 7/28/2014 2003
Olive Garden Houston TX 
 973
 2,902
 
 3,875
 (279) 7/28/2014 1994
Olive Garden Chesapeake VA 
 1,382
 2,252
 
 3,634
 (224) 7/28/2014 1991
Olive Garden Manassas VA 
 1,965
 2,585
 
 4,550
 (252) 7/28/2014 1993
Olive Garden Silverdale WA 
 1,752
 2,015
 
 3,767
 (204) 7/28/2014 1993
Olive Garden Morgantown WV 
 1,765
 2,199
 
 3,964
 (281) 7/28/2014 2006
Omnipoint Communication Indianapolis IN 49,838
 5,770
 64,073
 2,108
 71,951
 (14,607) 5/9/2013 2000
On the Border Rogers AR 950
 655
 1,500
 
 2,155
 (368) 2/7/2014 2002
On the Border Mesa AZ 1,804
 2,090
 1,534
 
 3,624
 (378) 2/7/2014 1998
On the Border Peoria AZ 1,562
 2,129
 1,352
 
 3,481
 (305) 2/7/2014 1998
On the Border Alpharetta GA 
 1,771
 1,842
 
 3,613
 (450) 2/7/2014 1997
On the Border Buford GA 
 1,786
 1,506
 
 3,292
 (374) 2/7/2014 2001
On the Border Naperville IL 
 2,549
 1,414
 
 3,963
 (409) 2/7/2014 1997
On the Border West Springfield MA 2,000
 413
 4,173
 
 4,586
 (967) 2/7/2014 1995
On the Border Auburn Hills MI 
 1,355
 2,745
 
 4,100
 (623) 2/7/2014 1999
On the Border Novi MI 
 444
 3,176
 
 3,620
 (700) 2/7/2014 1997
On the Border Kansas City MO 1,454
 1,743
 1,039
 
 2,782
 (313) 2/7/2014 1997
On the Border Lees Summit MO 1,200
 1,647
 1,008
 
 2,655
 (297) 2/7/2014 2002

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 779
 1,600
 
 2,379
 (123) 4/18/2017  2001
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 721
 996
 
 1,717
 (73) 5/16/2017  1984
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 458
 938
 
 1,396
 (71) 5/16/2017  1961
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 662
 777
 
 1,439
 (58) 5/16/2017  2002
Mister Car Wash Kentwood MI 
 238
 877
 
 1,115
 (68) 5/16/2017  1979
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market Canton MI 
 1,361
 6,976
 
 8,337
 (565) 5/18/2017  2017
Take 5 Oil Change Miamisburg OH 
 246
 486
 
 732
 (39) 6/8/2017  1992
Take 5 Oil Change Florence KY 
 279
 896
 
 1,175
 (65) 6/8/2017  1998
Take 5 Oil Change Fort Wright KY 
 179
 816
 
 995
 (63) 6/8/2017  1995
Take 5 Oil Change Lawrenceburg IN 
 516
 721
 
 1,237
 (59) 6/8/2017  2017
Take 5 Oil Change Erlanger KY 
 337
 1,072
 
 1,409
 (76) 6/8/2017  2003
Take 5 Oil Change Moraine OH 
 415
 692
 
 1,107
 (51) 6/8/2017  1995
Take 5 Oil Change Alexandria KY 
 294
 677
 
 971
 (50) 6/8/2017  1996
Tractor Supply Buena Vista CO 
 646
 2,974
 
 3,620
 (228) 6/16/2017  2014
Hobby Lobby Algonquin IL 
 998
 4,580
 
 5,578
 (357) 6/23/2017  2012
Bob Evans Amherst OH 
 163
 1,557
 
 1,720
 (126) 6/26/2017  1987
Bob Evans Brunswick OH 
 1,147
 1,088
 
 2,235
 (95) 6/26/2017  1992
Bob Evans Cincinnati OH 
 563
 1,706
 
 2,269
 (149) 6/26/2017  2003
Bob Evans Cincinnati OH 
 601
 1,529
 
 2,130
 (135) 6/26/2017  2002
Bob Evans East Peoria IL 
 717
 1,142
 
 1,859
 (99) 6/26/2017  1993
Bob Evans Indianapolis IN 
 430
 708
 
 1,138
 (62) 6/26/2017  2002
Bob Evans Jackson MI 
 980
 1,305
 
 2,285
 (102) 6/26/2017  2005
Bob Evans Lancaster OH 
 626
 1,546
 
 2,172
 (131) 6/26/2017  1998
Bob Evans Lima OH 
 366
 1,631
 
 1,997
 (139) 6/26/2017  2000
Bob Evans Marion OH 
 469
 1,657
 
 2,126
 (143) 6/26/2017  2008
Bob Evans Medina OH 
 496
 1,050
 
 1,546
 (93) 6/26/2017  2000
Bob Evans Mentor OH 
 626
 929
 
 1,555
 (80) 6/26/2017  1999
Bob Evans Mount Vernon OH 
 343
 1,338
 
 1,681
 (119) 6/26/2017  2011
Bob Evans Muskegon MI 
 550
 860
 
 1,410
 (70) 6/26/2017  2001
Bob Evans Newark DE 
 869
 810
 
 1,679
 (62) 6/26/2017  1996
Bob Evans Phoenixville PA 
 495
 438
 
 933
 (34) 6/26/2017  1999
Bob Evans Stow OH 
 418
 1,416
 
 1,834
 (125) 6/26/2017  2002
Bob Evans Troy OH 
 512
 1,255
 
 1,767
 (109) 6/26/2017  1992

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
On the Border Concord Mills NC 
 1,903
 1,456
 
 3,359
 (398) 2/7/2014 2000
On the Border Mount Laurel NJ 713
 1,446
 1,938
 
 3,384
 (473) 2/7/2014 2004
On the Border W. Windsor NJ 2,433
 1,489
 1,703
 
 3,192
 (549) 2/7/2014 1998
On the Border Columbus OH 1,925
 1,594
 1,558
 
 3,152
 (442) 2/7/2014 1997
On the Border Oklahoma City OK 
 859
 2,310
 
 3,169
 (572) 2/7/2014 1996
On the Border Tulsa OK 
 740
 2,956
 
 3,696
 (714) 2/7/2014 1995
On the Border Burleson TX 
 891
 2,844
 
 3,735
 (680) 2/7/2014 2000
On the Border College Station TX 
 2,218
 1,471
 
 3,689
 (358) 2/7/2014 1997
On the Border Denton TX 
 1,419
 2,012
 
 3,431
 (490) 2/7/2014 2002
On the Border Desoto TX 
 751
 3,207
 
 3,958
 (734) 2/7/2014 1998
On the Border Ft. Worth TX 
 1,222
 2,991
 
 4,213
 (693) 2/7/2014 1999
On the Border Garland TX 
 1,065
 1,692
 
 2,757
 (403) 2/7/2014 2007
On the Border Lubbock TX 
 375
 3,679
 
 4,054
 (818) 2/7/2014 1994
On the Border Rockwall TX 
 693
 3,244
 
 3,937
 (700) 2/7/2014 1999
On the Border Woodbridge VA 
 1,799
 899
 
 2,698
 (441) 2/7/2014 1998
O'Reilly Auto Parts Oneonta AL 
 81
 460
 
 541
 (134) 8/2/2012 2000
O'Reilly Auto Parts Louisville KY 
 573
 794
 
 1,367
 (167) 2/7/2014 2011
O'Reilly Auto Parts Breaux Bridge LA 
 139
 738
 
 877
 (157) 2/7/2014 2009
O'Reilly Auto Parts Central LA 
 104
 915
 
 1,019
 (188) 2/7/2014 2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts La Place LA 
 342
 819
 
 1,161
 (173) 2/7/2014 2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts New Roads LA 
 175
 737
 
 912
 (158) 2/7/2014 2008
O'Reilly Auto Parts Ravenna OH 
 144
 1,137
 
 1,281
 (230) 2/7/2014 2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Willard OH 
 137
 877
 
 1,014
 (173) 2/7/2014 2011
O'Reilly Auto Parts Highlands TX 485
 281
 813
 
 1,094
 (153) 2/7/2014 2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Houston TX 560
 340
 895
 
 1,235
 (169) 2/7/2014 2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts San Antonio TX 703
 439
 1,030
 
 1,469
 (200) 2/7/2014 2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Christiansburg VA 646
 562
 793
 
 1,355
 (155) 2/7/2014 2010
O'Reilly Auto Parts Laramie WY 
 144
 1,297
 
 1,441
 (372) 10/12/2012 1999
Outback Steakhouse Fort Smith AR 
 841
 1,996
 
 2,837
 (492) 2/7/2014 1999
Outback Steakhouse Centennial CO 
 1,378
 1,397
 
 2,775
 (351) 2/7/2014 1996
Outback Steakhouse Jacksonville FL 
 770
 2,261
 
 3,031
 (497) 2/7/2014 2001
Outback Steakhouse Sebring FL 
 981
 1,695
 
 2,676
 (421) 2/7/2014 2001

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bob Evans Wapakoneta OH 
 253
 1,479
 
 1,732
 (131) 6/26/2017  2001
Bob Evans Wilkes-Barre PA 
 373
 714
 
 1,087
 (56) 6/26/2017  2003
Bob Evans Willoughby OH 
 675
 1,262
 
 1,937
 (108) 6/26/2017  2005
Bob Evans Xenia OH 
 337
 1,433
 
 1,770
 (126) 6/26/2017  1988
Helmer Scientific Noblesville IN 
 1,431
 10,699
 
 12,130
 (722) 7/27/2017  2012
Gorilla Glue Cincinnati OH 
 5,563
 34,887
 
 40,450
 (2,513) 7/28/2017  1978
LA Fitness Webster NY 
 2,922
 5,102
 
 8,024
 (391) 8/1/2017  2014
Lamrite West Strongsville OH 
 3,078
 34,076
 
 37,154
 (2,138) 8/21/2017  1999
Five Below Smyrna TN 
 2,009
 9,467
 108
 11,584
 (658) 8/25/2017  2016
Mattress Firm Oak Creek WI 
 906
 3,578
 
 4,484
 (276) 8/25/2017  2016
Cabela's Rogers AR 
 3,419
 17,605
 
 21,024
 (1,148) 9/25/2017  2012
Cabela's Thornton CO 
 3,677
 19,099
 
 22,776
 (1,216) 9/25/2017  2012
Cabela's Grandville MI 
 3,269
 20,328
 
 23,597
 (1,312) 9/25/2017  2013
Cabela's Lacey WA 
 3,393
 20,158
 (29) 23,522
 (1,365) 9/25/2017  2007
Cabela's Oklahoma City OK 
 3,383
 11,590
 
 14,973
 (746) 9/25/2017  2015
Mister Car Wash Florence AL 
 198
 1,376
 3
 1,577
 (89) 10/17/2017  2008
Mister Car Wash Muscle Shoals AL 
 378
 1,445
 3
 1,826
 (100) 10/17/2017  2008
Mister Car Wash Florence AL 
 404
 1,605
 3
 2,012
 (129) 10/17/2017  2016
Duluth Trading Co Avon OH 
 1,088
 3,671
 
 4,759
 (291) 10/20/2017  2017
Amesbury Truth Statesville NC 
 424
 23,261
 19
 23,704
 (1,393) 10/24/2017  2017
Petsmart Sedalia MO 
 273
 3,645
 
 3,918
 (230) 11/1/2017  2017
Tractor Supply York NE 
 326
 2,452
 
 2,778
 (165) 11/3/2017  2017
LA Fitness Tampa FL 
 1,084
 6,500
 
 7,584
 (480) 11/13/2017  2016
Five Below Montgomery AL 
 1,480
 9,117
 314
 10,911
 (721) 11/17/2017  2017
Michaels Lancaster CA 
 7,744
 33,872
 
 41,616
 (2,102) 11/20/2017  1998
Art Van Furniture Avon OH 
 925
 10,031
 
 10,956
 (623) 11/22/2017  2016
Art Van Furniture Hanover PA 
 703
 4,108
 177
 4,988
 (253) 11/22/2017  1996
Art Van Furniture Johnstown PA 
 386
 2,582
 201
 3,169
 (180) 11/22/2017  1969
Art Van Furniture Lancaster PA 
 2,156
 6,030
 394
 8,580
 (387) 11/22/2017  1978
Art Van Furniture Mentor OH 
 1,090
 9,582
 
 10,672
 (593) 11/22/2017  2009
Art Van Furniture Middleburg Heights OH 
 1,440
 5,529
 
 6,969
 (336) 11/22/2017  1973
Art Van Furniture North Canton OH 
 545
 8,636
 
 9,181
 (546) 11/22/2017  2007
Tractor Supply Romney WV 
 418
 3,097
 
 3,515
 (194) 11/29/2017  2017

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Outback Steakhouse Fort Wayne IN 
 733
 984
 
 1,717
 (406) 2/7/2014 2000
Outback Steakhouse Lexington KY 
 1,077
 2,139
 
 3,216
 (511) 2/7/2014 2002
Outback Steakhouse Baton Rouge LA 
 742
 1,272
 
 2,014
 (301) 2/7/2014 2001
Outback Steakhouse Southgate MI 
 787
 2,742
 
 3,529
 (620) 2/7/2014 1994
Outback Steakhouse Lees Summit MO 
 901
 620
 
 1,521
 (169) 2/7/2014 1999
Outback Steakhouse Garner NC 
 1,088
 1,817
 
 2,905
 (439) 2/7/2014 2004
Outback Steakhouse Las Cruces NM 
 536
 1,549
 
 2,085
 (357) 2/7/2014 2000
Outback Steakhouse Boardman Township OH 
 575
 2,742
 
 3,317
 (633) 2/7/2014 1995
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Burlington West Valley City UT 
 2,331
 5,821
 
 8,152
 (486) 11/30/2017  2017
Duluth Trading Co Waukesha WI 
 857
 4,067
 
 4,924
 (241) 12/14/2017  2017
Bed Bath & Beyond Windsor VA 
 3,032
 59,649
 3
 62,684
 (3,109) 12/20/2017  2001
LA Fitness Tinley Park IL 
 1,722
 8,976
 
 10,698
 (510) 12/22/2017  2006
Petco Tucson AZ 
 1,176
 8,565
 
 9,741
 (624) 12/28/2017  2017
Petsmart Lee's Summit MO 
 781
 3,381
 
 4,162
 (195) 1/5/2018  2017
At Home Blaine MN 
 3,023
 9,220
 
 12,243
 (547) 2/8/2018  2001
At Home Fort Worth TX 
 2,641
 10,723
 
 13,364
 (600) 2/8/2018  2015
At Home Jackson MS 
 2,661
 7,245
 
 9,906
 (408) 2/8/2018  1995
At Home Memphis TN 
 4,790
 4,048
 
 8,838
 (279) 2/8/2018  2005
Hobby Lobby Auburn ME 
 2,606
 3,566
 
 6,172
 (188) 3/7/2018  2014
Burlington Rogers AR 
 1,460
 6,379
 
 7,839
 (337) 3/7/2018  2015
Best Buy Silverdale WA 
 3,687
 10,570
 380
 14,637
 (732) 3/27/2018  1991
Codale Orem UT 
 637
 5,171
 7
 5,815
 (404) 3/30/2018  1995
Codale Logan UT 
 420
 3,007
 
 3,427
 (173) 3/30/2018  2010
Codale West Valley UT 
 2,684
 25,881
 
 28,565
 (1,302) 3/30/2018  2008
Duluth Trading Co West Fargo ND 
 1,099
 3,208
 
 4,307
 (164) 4/27/2018  2018
Big Lots Foley AL 
 1,770
 6,842
 
 8,612
 (319) 5/24/2018  2014
SiteOne Homer Glen IL 
 929
 893
 7
 1,829
 (83) 5/29/2018  1960
SiteOne Park City IL 
 932
 744
 11
 1,687
 (64) 5/29/2018  1988
SiteOne Pingree Grove IL 
 1,281
 1,161
 
 2,442
 (90) 5/29/2018  2018
Marshalls Phoenix AZ 
 2,325
 5,948
 
 8,273
 (329) 5/31/2018  1997
Floor & Decor Riverdale UT 
 2,920
 5,734
 129
 8,783
 (457) 6/28/2018  1992
At Home Wixom MI 
 3,329
 11,339
 
 14,668
 (547) 7/3/2018  2017
At Home Shreveport LA 
 2,093
 12,311
 
 14,404
 (557) 7/3/2018  2018
At Home Clarksville TN 
 1,649
 7,625
 
 9,274
 (357) 7/3/2018  1992
Mad Max Fond Du Lac WI 
 303
 1,212
 
 1,515
 (64) 7/17/2018  2007
Mad Max Fond Du Lac WI 
 1,484
 2,511
 
 3,995
 (186) 7/17/2018  1974
Mad Max Fond Du Lac WI 
 133
 272
 
 405
 (19) 7/17/2018  1952
Mad Max Port Washington WI 
 191
 568
 
 759
 (34) 7/17/2018  1991
Mad Max Port Washington WI 
 533
 733
 
 1,266
 (44) 7/17/2018  1996
Mad Max West Bend WI 
 463
 710
 
 1,173
 (43) 7/17/2018  2012


F-174



        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Mad Max West Bend WI 
 483
 965
 
 1,448
 (52) 7/17/2018  2016
Mad Max West Bend WI 
 278
 315
 
 593
 (23) 7/17/2018  1986
Mad Max West Bend WI 
 333
 570
 
 903
 (33) 7/17/2018  1999
LA Fitness Memphis TN 
 1,466
 7,348
 
 8,814
 (346) 7/26/2018  2014
Mister Car Wash Grand Rapids MI 
 554
 902
 
 1,456
 (39) 8/15/2018  1976
Mister Car Wash Jenison MI 
 393
 915
 
 1,308
 (36) 8/15/2018  1977
Regal Cinemas Christiansburg VA 
 1,610
 9,897
 
 11,507
 (353) 8/24/2018  2007
Marshall's Convenience Stores Cascade WI 
 32
 436
 
 468
 (23) 8/30/2018  1991
Marshall's Convenience Stores Elkhart Lake WI 
 283
 955
 
 1,238
 (50) 8/30/2018  1985
Marshall's Convenience Stores Glenbeulah WI 
 45
 605
 
 650
 (31) 8/30/2018  2008
Marshall's Convenience Stores Kewaskum WI 
 253
 468
 
 721
 (27) 8/30/2018  1999
Marshall's Convenience Stores Plymouth WI 
 82
 318
 
 400
 (17) 8/30/2018  1984
Marshall's Convenience Stores Plymouth WI 
 199
 539
 
 738
 (33) 8/30/2018  2005
At Home Rogers AR 
 2,589
 10,042
 
 12,631
 (373) 10/3/2018  2018
At Home Gilbert AZ 
 4,053
 8,351
 
 12,404
 (312) 10/3/2018  2017
At Home Richmond TX 
 4,605
 7,273
 
 11,878
 (276) 10/3/2018  2017
Insurance Auto Auctions Hudson FL 
 1,062
 11,203
 
 12,265
 (819) 10/9/2018  2018
Floor & Decor Oklahoma City OK 
 3,069
 6,666
 
 9,735
 (227) 10/25/2018  2018
Topgolf Brooklyn Center MN 
 8,173
 24,628
 
 32,801
 (1,164) 11/2/2018  2018
Floor & Decor Overland Park KS 
 2,943
 5,832
 
 8,775
 (202) 11/26/2018  1963
Duluth Trading Co South Portland ME 
 811
 3,254
 
 4,065
 (106) 12/13/2018  2018
Mills Fleet Farm Cedar Falls IA 
 
 3,501
 20,626
 24,127
 (148) 12/21/2018  2019
Graphic Packaging Monroe LA 
 637
 91,313
 5
 91,955
 (2,683) 12/28/2018  2018
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market Omaha NE 
 1,392
 6,652
 
 8,044
 (182) 1/15/2019  2017
LA Fitness Edina MN 
 2,914
 9,189
 
 12,103
 (242) 1/30/2019  1968
24 Hour Fitness Indio CA 
 2,171
 10,333
 
 12,504
 (286) 2/5/2019  2007
La-Z-Boy Chandler AZ 
 2,932
 4,710
 
 7,642
 (265) 2/13/2019  2005
La-Z-Boy Tucson AZ 
 1,144
 4,311
 
 5,455
 (227) 2/13/2019  2002
La-Z-Boy Goodyear AZ 
 2,034
 5,147
 
 7,181
 (291) 2/13/2019  2008
La-Z-Boy Prescott Valley AZ 
 1,048
 2,244
 
 3,292
 (124) 2/13/2019  2016
Floor & Decor Jacksonville FL 
 4,080
 11,337
 
 15,417
 (263) 3/27/2019  2018
Steinhafels Menomonee Falls WI 
 3,581
 11,263
 
 14,844
 (199) 5/1/2019  2006
Steinhafels Oak Creek WI 
 3,707
 6,776
 
 10,483
 (131) 5/1/2019  1986

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Outback Steakhouse Independence OH 
 901
 2,268
 
 3,169
 (434) 2/7/2014 2006
Outback Steakhouse Pittsburgh PA 
 1,370
 932
 
 2,302
 (329) 2/7/2014 1995
Outback Steakhouse Conroe TX 
 959
 2,063
 
 3,022
 (440) 2/7/2014 2001
Outback Steakhouse Houston TX 
 964
 2,321
 
 3,285
 (497) 2/7/2014 1998
Outback Steakhouse Mcallen TX 
 835
 443
 
 1,278
 (108) 2/7/2014 1999
Outback Steakhouse Colonial Heights VA 
 1,297
 746
 
 2,043
 (439) 2/7/2014 2000
Outback Steakhouse Newport News VA 
 600
 1,356
 
 1,956
 (533) 2/7/2014 1993
Outback Steakhouse Winchester VA 
 704
 1,310
 
 2,014
 (565) 2/7/2014 2006
Owens & Minor Cleveland OH 
 755
 6,077
 (4) 6,828
 (989) 9/30/2014 2014
Owens Corning Newark OH 
 725
 13,013
 
 13,738
 (2,292) 2/7/2014 2007
Owens Corning Wichita Falls TX 
 231
 847
 
 1,078
 (149) 6/12/2014 1972
Pantry Gas & Convenience Montgomery AL 
 526
 1,228
 
 1,754
 (346) 12/31/2012 1998
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,332
 1,332
 
 2,664
 (376) 12/31/2012 2004
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,667
 417
 
 2,084
 (118) 12/31/2012 1982
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,191
 1,787
 
 2,978
 (504) 12/31/2012 1987
Pantry Gas & Convenience Charlotte NC 
 1,070
 1,308
 
 2,378
 (369) 12/31/2012 1997
Pantry Gas & Convenience Conover NC 
 1,144
 936
 
 2,080
 (264) 12/31/2012 1998
Pantry Gas & Convenience Cornelius NC 
 1,847
 2,258
 
 4,105
 (637) 12/31/2012 1999
Pantry Gas & Convenience Lincolnton NC 
 1,766
 2,159
 
 3,925
 (609) 12/31/2012 2000
Pantry Gas & Convenience Matthews NC 
 980
 1,819
 
 2,799
 (513) 12/31/2012 1987
Pantry Gas & Convenience Thomasville NC 
 1,175
 1,436
 
 2,611
 (405) 12/31/2012 2000
Pantry Gas & Convenience Fort Mill SC 
 1,311
 1,967
 
 3,278
 (555) 12/31/2012 1988
Pearson Education Lawrence KS 
 2,548
 18,057
 (3,435) 17,170
 (1,216) 11/5/2013 1997
Penske Bedford OH 
 183
 
 
 183
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Peraton Herndon VA 
 1,384
 53,584
 (20,560) 34,408
 
 11/5/2013 1999
Petco Lake Charles LA 2,145
 690
 4,072
 
 4,762
 (766) 2/7/2014 2008
Petco Dardenne Prairie MO 
 806
 3,024
 
 3,830
 (556) 2/7/2014 2009
Petsmart Phoenix AZ 51,250
 7,308
 97,510
 36
 104,854
 (15,598) 2/7/2014 1997
Petsmart Merced CA 
 1,729
 4,194
 
 5,923
 (785) 2/7/2014 1993
Petsmart Redding CA 
 1,312
 4,133
 207
 5,652
 (845) 2/7/2014 1989
Petsmart Westlake Village CA 
 3,406
 5,017
 
 8,423
 (904) 2/7/2014 1998
Petsmart Boca Raton FL 
 3,514
 4,912
 
 8,426
 (953) 2/7/2014 2001

        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Steinhafels Vernon Hills IL 
 5,574
 7,858
 
 13,432
 (143) 5/1/2019  2001
blue moose Oshkosh WI 
 192
 432
 
 624
 (12) 5/16/2019  1956
blue moose Oshkosh WI 
 212
 764
 
 976
 (21) 5/16/2019  1959
blue moose Oshkosh WI 
 108
 500
 
 608
 (14) 5/16/2019  1997
blue moose Oshkosh WI 
 263
 1,191
 
 1,454
 (31) 5/16/2019  2007
blue moose Rothschild WI 
 162
 751
 
 913
 (20) 5/16/2019  1990
Duluth Trading Co Spokane Valley WA 
 1,203
 3,769
 
 4,972
 (75) 5/17/2019  2019
Take 5 Oil Change Abilene TX 
 53
 630
 
 683
 (10) 6/18/2019  1996
Take 5 Oil Change Aledo TX 
 253
 1,054
 
 1,307
 (18) 6/18/2019  2005
Take 5 Oil Change Arlington TX 
 227
 439
 
 666
 (7) 6/18/2019  1998
Take 5 Oil Change Arlington TX 
 144
 629
 
 773
 (10) 6/18/2019  1996
Take 5 Oil Change Big Spring TX 
 191
 823
 
 1,014
 (13) 6/18/2019  1990
Take 5 Oil Change Canyon TX 
 73
 648
 
 721
 (11) 6/18/2019  1985
Take 5 Oil Change Fort Worth TX 
 208
 559
 
 767
 (9) 6/18/2019  2006
Take 5 Oil Change Hudson Oaks TX 
 231
 828
 
 1,059
 (14) 6/18/2019  2009
Take 5 Oil Change Midland TX 
 291
 1,495
 
 1,786
 (24) 6/18/2019  2004
Take 5 Oil Change Midland TX 
 198
 1,253
 
 1,451
 (20) 6/18/2019  1990
Take 5 Oil Change Odessa TX 
 150
 1,003
 
 1,153
 (16) 6/18/2019  1990
Take 5 Oil Change Odessa TX 
 188
 1,521
 
 1,709
 (23) 6/18/2019  2006
Horizon Hobby Champaign IL 
 316
 16,835
 
 17,151
 (234) 6/20/2019  1980
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market Green Park MO 
 2,576
 6,629
 
 9,205
 (105) 6/25/2019  2017
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market St. Peters MO 
 1,362
 6,960
 
 8,322
 (110) 6/25/2019  2018
Art Van Furniture Holland MI 
 1,281
 6,648
 
 7,929
 (110) 6/26/2019  1993
Duluth Trading Co Rogers AR 
 967
 3,997
 
 4,964
 (59) 7/2/2019  2019
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market Evansville IN 
 713
 6,543
 
 7,256
 (105) 7/17/2019  2018
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market Muncie IN 
 1,095
 6,832
 
 7,927
 (114) 7/17/2019  2018
La-Z-Boy Loveland OH 
 921
 2,041
 
 2,962
 (23) 8/12/2019  1996
La-Z-Boy Cincinnati OH 
 808
 2,996
 
 3,804
 (38) 8/12/2019  2018
Radians Memphis TN 
 944
 18,125
 
 19,069
 (184) 9/11/2019  2000
AMC Theaters Vancouver WA 
 1,842
 6,188
 
 8,030
 (56) 9/23/2019  2005
Spare Time Colchester VT 
 1,929
 5,996
 
 7,925
 (22) 11/13/2019  1979
Spare Time Greenville SC 
 1,844
 11,054
 
 12,898
 (44) 11/13/2019  2017
Bread & Butter Shop Marshfield WI 
 111
 338
 
 449
 (2) 11/14/2019  1982

       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Petsmart Lake Mary FL 
 2,430
 2,556
 
 4,986
 (502) 2/7/2014 1997
Petsmart Plantation FL 
 965
 5,302
 
 6,267
 (979) 2/7/2014 2001
Petsmart Tallahassee FL 
 1,468
 1,387
 
 2,855
 (282) 2/7/2014 1998
Petsmart Evanston IL 
 1,120
 6,007
 
 7,127
 (1,080) 2/7/2014 2001
Petsmart Braintree MA 
 2,805
 8,398
 
 11,203
 (1,470) 2/7/2014 1996
Petsmart Oxon Hill MD 
 1,722
 4,389
 
 6,111
 (815) 2/7/2014 1998
Petsmart Flint MI 
 606
 3,839
 
 4,445
 (710) 2/7/2014 1996
PetSmart Sedalia MO 
 273
 3,645
 
 3,918
 (14) 11/1/2017 2017
Petsmart Parma OH 
 1,288
 3,527
 
 4,815
 (650) 2/7/2014 1996
Petsmart Dallas TX 
 470
 6,089
 
 6,559
 (1,053) 2/7/2014 1998
Petsmart Southlake TX 
 1,063
 7,093
 
 8,156
 (1,253) 2/7/2014 1998
PetSmart Oak Creek WI 
 906
 3,578
 
 4,484
 (44) 8/25/2017 2016
Physicians Dialysis Lawrenceville NJ 
 633
 2,757
 
 3,390
 (467) 2/7/2014 2009
Physicians Immediate Care Aurora IL 
 1,043
 1,346
 
 2,389
 (299) 2/7/2014 2003
Physicians Immediate Care Glendale Heights IL 
 487
 2,256
 
 2,743
 (475) 2/7/2014 1997
Physicians Immediate Care New Lenox IL 
 535
 1,884
 
 2,419
 (405) 2/7/2014 2011
Physicians Immediate Care Plainfield IL 
 590
 1,747
 
 2,337
 (372) 2/7/2014 2011
Physicians Immediate Care Mishawaka IN 
 252
 1,351
 
 1,603
 (314) 2/7/2014 2013
Pier 1 Imports Victoria TX 
 457
 1,767
 
 2,224
 (375) 2/7/2014 2011
Pilot Flying J Carnesville GA 
 1,867
 7,466
 
 9,333
 (2,674) 1/31/2013 2000
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Page AZ 
 66
 263
 
 329
 (62) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cooper City FL 
 320
 466
 
 786
 (119) 6/27/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Marathon FL 
 530
 187
 
 717
 (48) 6/27/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Ashburn GA 
 102
 233
 (39) 296
 (31) 6/27/2013 1988
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Eatonton GA 
 353
 353
 
 706
 (83) 7/31/2013 1988
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Greensboro GA 
 569
 465
 
 1,034
 (109) 7/31/2013 1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Jackson GA 
 673
 735
 
 1,408
 (185) 6/27/2013 1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Louisville KY 
 539
 499
 
 1,038
 (126) 6/27/2013 1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Salisbury MD 
 245
 734
 
 979
 (173) 7/31/2013 1983
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Dearborn MI 
 284
 528
 
 812
 (124) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bozeman MT 
 150
 343
 
 493
 (88) 6/27/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Glasgow MT 
 120
 217
 
 337
 (55) 6/27/2013 1995


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Livingston MT 
 130
 245
 
 375
 (63) 6/27/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet East Syracuse NY 
 137
 185
 
 322
 (47) 6/27/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Nedrow NY 
 55
 80
 
 135
 (20) 6/27/2013 1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bowling Green OH 
 141
 262
 
 403
 (62) 7/31/2013 1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cleveland OH 
 87
 175
 
 262
 (44) 6/27/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Defiance OH 
 114
 197
 
 311
 (50) 6/27/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Delaware OH 
 270
 721
 
 991
 (181) 6/27/2013 1975
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Middleburg Hts OH 
 128
 156
 
 284
 (37) 7/31/2013 1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet North Olmsted OH 
 122
 153
 
 275
 (38) 6/27/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Norwalk OH 
 77
 115
 
 192
 (27) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Sandusky OH 
 140
 171
 
 311
 (40) 7/31/2013 1982
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Strongsville OH 
 74
 108
 
 182
 (27) 6/27/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Toledo OH 
 58
 173
 
 231
 (43) 6/27/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Shamokin PA 
 54
 217
 
 271
 (51) 7/31/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Batesburg SC 
 261
 484
 
 745
 (114) 7/31/2013 1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bishopville SC 
 365
 365
 
 730
 (86) 7/31/2013 1987
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cheraw SC 
 415
 507
 
 922
 (119) 7/31/2013 1984
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Columbia SC 
 881
 588
 
 1,469
 (138) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Edgefield SC 
 221
 410
 
 631
 (97) 7/31/2013 1986
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Laurens SC 
 454
 371
 
 825
 (87) 7/31/2013 1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Pageland SC 
 344
 420
 
 764
 (99) 7/31/2013 1999
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Saluda SC 
 346
 346
 
 692
 (81) 7/31/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Santee SC 
 371
 248
 
 619
 (58) 7/31/2013 1972
Pizza Hut/WingStreet St. George SC 
 367
 245
 
 612
 (58) 7/31/2013 1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet West Columbia SC 
 507
 415
 
 922
 (97) 7/31/2013 1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Box Elder SD 
 68
 217
 
 285
 (55) 6/27/2013 1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Knoxville TN 
 300
 546
 
 846
 (140) 6/27/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Amarillo TX 
 339
 1,016
 
 1,355
 (239) 7/31/2013 1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Amarillo TX 
 254
 1,015
 
 1,269
 (239) 7/31/2013 1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Crystal City TX 
 148
 453
 
 601
 (114) 6/27/2013 1981
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Fort Stockton TX 
 252
 1,007
 
 1,259
 (237) 7/31/2013 2008
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Midland TX 
 414
 506
 
 920
 (119) 7/31/2013 1975


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Midland TX 
 506
 619
 
 1,125
 (145) 7/31/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Monahans TX 
 361
 671
 
 1,032
 (158) 7/31/2013 1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 456
 847
 
 1,303
 (199) 7/31/2013 1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 588
 882
 
 1,470
 (207) 7/31/2013 1972
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 572
 572
 
 1,144
 (135) 7/31/2013 1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 627
 766
 
 1,393
 (180) 7/31/2013 1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Odessa TX 
 457
 685
 
 1,142
 (161) 7/31/2013 1976
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Pecos TX 
 387
 719
 
 1,106
 (169) 7/31/2013 1974
Pizza Hut/WingStreet San Angelo TX 
 214
 641
 (183) 672
 (41) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet San Angelo TX 
 268
 624
 (266) 626
 (36) 7/31/2013 1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Stamford TX 
 38
 115
 
 153
 (27) 7/31/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Cedar City UT 
 52
 361
 
 413
 (91) 6/27/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Kanab UT 
 52
 210
 
 262
 (49) 7/31/2013 1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Ashland VA 
 589
 1,093
 
 1,682
 (257) 7/31/2013 1989
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Bedford VA 
 548
 670
 
 1,218
 (158) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Chester VA 
 473
 1,104
 
 1,577
 (260) 7/31/2013 1983
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Christiansburg VA 
 494
 918
 
 1,412
 (216) 7/31/2013 1982
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Clifton Forge VA 
 287
 861
 
 1,148
 (202) 7/31/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Colonial Heights VA 
 311
 311
 
 622
 (73) 7/31/2013 1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Hampton VA 
 641
 345
 
 986
 (81) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Hopewell VA 
 707
 864
 
 1,571
 (203) 7/31/2013 1985
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Newport News VA 
 394
 591
 
 985
 (139) 7/31/2013 1969
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Newport News VA 
 394
 591
 
 985
 (139) 7/31/2013 1970
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Petersburg VA 
 378
 701
 
 1,079
 (165) 7/31/2013 1979
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Richmond VA 
 666
 814
 
 1,480
 (191) 7/31/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Richmond VA 
 311
 311
 
 622
 (73) 7/31/2013 1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Abbotsford WI 
 159
 195
 
 354
 (46) 7/31/2013 1980
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Antigo WI 
 45
 252
 100
 397
 (71) 7/31/2013 1997
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Clintonville WI 
 208
 69
 
 277
 (16) 7/31/2013 1978
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Eagle River WI 
 28
 159
 
 187
 (37) 7/31/2013 1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Hayward WI 
 51
 205
 
 256
 (48) 7/31/2013 1993
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Merrill WI 
 83
 531
 (100) 514
 (93) 7/31/2013 1980


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Neillsville WI 
 35
 106
 
 141
 (25) 7/31/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Plover WI 
 85
 199
 100
 384
 (57) 7/31/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Stevens Point WI 
 130
 390
 100
 620
 (106) 7/31/2013 1995
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Tomahawk WI 
 35
 81
 
 116
 (19) 7/31/2013 1986
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Waupaca WI 
 61
 91
 35
 187
 (29) 7/31/2013 1991
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Beckley WV 
 160
 131
 
 291
 (31) 7/31/2013 1977
Pizza Hut/WingStreet Huntington WV 
 190
 4
 
 194
 (1) 7/31/2013 1995
PLS Check Cashers Mesa AZ 
 187
 759
 
 946
 (208) 2/7/2014 2006
PLS Check Cashers Phoenix AZ 
 288
 677
 
 965
 (175) 2/7/2014 2006
PLS Check Cashers Tucson AZ 
 264
 800
 
 1,064
 (227) 2/7/2014 2005
PLS Check Cashers Compton CA 
 475
 107
 
 582
 (70) 2/7/2014 2005
PLS Check Cashers Calumet Park IL 
 306
 1,003
 
 1,309
 (269) 2/7/2014 2005
PLS Check Cashers Chicago IL 
 451
 127
 
 578
 (85) 2/7/2014 2001
PLS Check Cashers Dallas TX 
 197
 1,356
 
 1,553
 (291) 2/7/2014 1983
PLS Check Cashers Dallas TX 
 169
 1,180
 
 1,349
 (256) 2/7/2014 2003
PLS Check Cashers Fort Worth TX 
 187
 1,473
 
 1,660
 (306) 2/7/2014 2003
PLS Check Cashers Grand Prairie TX 
 385
 1,056
 
 1,441
 (227) 2/7/2014 1971
PLS Check Cashers Houston TX 
 158
 1,293
 
 1,451
 (255) 2/7/2014 2005
PLS Check Cashers Mesquite TX 
 261
 1,388
 
 1,649
 (321) 2/7/2014 2006
PLS Check Cashers Kenosha WI 
 190
 693
 
 883
 (165) 2/7/2014 2005
PNC Bank Woodbury NJ 
 465
 2,633
 
 3,098
 (594) 1/8/2014 1971
PNC Bank Cincinnati OH 
 195
 538
 
 733
 (123) 1/8/2014 1979
Pollo Tropical Davie FL 
 280
 1,490
 
 1,770
 (368) 6/27/2013 1995
Pollo Tropical Fort Lauderdale FL 
 190
 1,242
 
 1,432
 (307) 6/27/2013 1995
Pollo Tropical Lake Worth FL 
 280
 1,182
 
 1,462
 (292) 6/27/2013 1995
Ponderosa Scottsburg IN 
 430
 141
 
 571
 (37) 6/27/2013 1985
Popeyes Brandon FL 
 776
 961
 
 1,737
 (242) 6/27/2013 1978
Popeyes Carol City FL 
 423
 1,090
 
 1,513
 (240) 1/8/2014 1979
Popeyes Jacksonville FL 
 781
 955
 
 1,736
 (225) 7/31/2013 1955
Popeyes Lakeland FL 
 830
 830
 
 1,660
 (195) 7/31/2013 1999
Popeyes Miami FL 
 220
 330
 
 550
 (78) 7/31/2013 1962
Popeyes Orlando FL 
 782
 955
 
 1,737
 (225) 7/31/2013 2004


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Popeyes Pensacola FL 
 301
 673
 
 974
 (149) 1/8/2014 2001
Popeyes Starke FL 
 380
 
 614
 994
 (20) 6/27/2013 1995
Popeyes Tampa FL 
 216
 508
 
 724
 (112) 1/8/2014 1981
Popeyes Tampa FL 
 673
 1,065
 
 1,738
 (268) 6/27/2013 1976
Popeyes Winter Haven FL 
 484
 1,001
 
 1,485
 (252) 6/27/2013 1976
Popeyes Thomasville GA 
 110
 705
 
 815
 (174) 6/27/2013 1995
Popeyes Valdosta GA 
 240
 599
 
 839
 (148) 6/27/2013 1995
Popeyes Baton Rouge LA 
 323
 394
 
 717
 (93) 7/31/2013 1999
Popeyes Bayou Vista LA 
 375
 709
 
 1,084
 (179) 6/27/2013 1985
Popeyes Eunice LA 
 382
 891
 
 1,273
 (209) 7/31/2013 1986
Popeyes Franklin LA 
 283
 538
 
 821
 (135) 6/27/2013 1985
Popeyes Lafayette LA 
 434
 899
 
 1,333
 (226) 6/27/2013 1993
Popeyes Lafayette LA 
 473
 901
 
 1,374
 (227) 6/27/2013 1996
Popeyes Marksville LA 
 487
 1,129
 
 1,616
 (284) 6/27/2013 1987
Popeyes Ferguson MO 
 128
 383
 
 511
 (90) 7/31/2013 1984
Popeyes St. Louis MO 
 248
 460
 
 708
 (116) 6/27/2013 1959
Popeyes St. Louis MO 
 288
 431
 
 719
 (101) 7/31/2013 1978
Popeyes Greenville MS 
 513
 977
 
 1,490
 (246) 6/27/2013 1984
Popeyes Grenada MS 
 77
 458
 
 535
 (101) 1/8/2014 2007
Popeyes Omaha NE 
 343
 515
 
 858
 (121) 7/31/2013 1996
Popeyes Omaha NE 
 264
 615
 
 879
 (145) 7/31/2013 1985
Popeyes Eatontown NJ 
 651
 796
 
 1,447
 (187) 7/31/2013 1987
Popeyes Austin TX 
 1,216
 533
 
 1,749
 (134) 6/27/2013 1996
Popeyes Channelview TX 
 220
 401
 
 621
 (99) 6/27/2013 1995
Popeyes Houston TX 
 190
 452
 
 642
 (112) 6/27/2013 1995
Popeyes Houston TX 
 295
 241
 
 536
 (57) 7/31/2013 1976
Popeyes Houston TX 
 111
 166
 
 277
 (39) 7/31/2013 1976
Popeyes Houston TX 
 278
 227
 
 505
 (53) 7/31/2013 1978
Popeyes Nederland TX 
 445
 668
 
 1,113
 (157) 7/31/2013 1988
Popeyes Orange TX 
 456
 847
 
 1,303
 (199) 7/31/2013 1984
Popeyes Port Arthur TX 
 408
 589
 
 997
 (148) 6/27/2013 1984
Popeyes Newport News VA 
 381
 217
 
 598
 (55) 6/27/2013 2002


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Popeyes Portsmouth VA 
 369
 230
 
 599
 (58) 6/27/2013 2002
Price Rite Rochester NY 3,080
 569
 3,594
 
 4,163
 (1,190) 9/27/2012 1965


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Publix Birmingham AL 
 934
 6,377
 165
 7,476
 (1,341) 2/7/2014 2004
Pulte Mortgage Englewood CO 
 2,563
 22,026
 
 24,589
 (4,568) 11/5/2013 2009
Qdoba Mexican Grill Flint MI 
 110
 990
 
 1,100
 (334) 3/29/2013 2006
Qdoba Mexican Grill Grand Blanc MI 
 165
 935
 
 1,100
 (315) 3/29/2013 2006
Quincy's Family Steakhouse Monroe NC 
 560
 458
 (245) 773
 (54) 7/31/2013 1978
RaceTrac Bessemer AL 
 761
 2,624
 
 3,385
 (556) 2/7/2014 2003
RaceTrac Mobile AL 
 580
 1,317
 
 1,897
 (279) 2/7/2014 1998
RaceTrac Bellview FL 
 684
 3,831
 
 4,515
 (844) 2/7/2014 2007
RaceTrac Jacksonville FL 
 1,065
 2,863
 
 3,928
 (680) 2/7/2014 2011
RaceTrac Leesburg FL 
 1,188
 2,711
 
 3,899
 (653) 2/7/2014 2007
RaceTrac Atlanta GA 
 1,025
 1,511
 
 2,536
 (339) 2/7/2014 2004
RaceTrac Denton TX 
 1,030
 2,645
 
 3,675
 (534) 2/7/2014 2003
RaceTrac Houston TX 
 1,209
 1,204
 
 2,413
 (250) 2/7/2014 1995
RaceTrac Houston TX 
 1,203
 1,509
 
 2,712
 (314) 2/7/2014 1997
Rally's Indianapolis IN 
 210
 1,514
 
 1,724
 (374) 6/27/2013 1995
Rally's Indianapolis IN 
 1,168
 
 
 1,168
 
 7/31/2013 2005
Rally's Indianapolis IN 
 1,168
 
 
 1,168
 
 7/31/2013 2005
Rally's Kokomo IN 
 290
 548
 
 838
 (135) 6/27/2013 1995
Rally's Muncie IN 
 310
 1,196
 
 1,506
 (295) 6/27/2013 1995
Rally's Harvey LA 
 420
 870
 
 1,290
 (215) 6/27/2013 1995
Rally's New Orleans LA 
 450
 1,691
 
 2,141
 (418) 6/27/2013 1995
Rally's New Orleans LA 
 220
 1,018
 
 1,238
 (251) 6/27/2013 1995
Rally's Hamtramck MI 
 230
 1,020
 
 1,250
 (252) 6/27/2013 1995
Red Lobster Birmingham AL 
 
 741
 
 741
 (136) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Decatur AL 
 1,100
 686
 
 1,786
 (147) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Dothan AL 
 726
 1,244
 
 1,970
 (168) 7/28/2014 1979
Red Lobster Florence AL 
 974
 908
 
 1,882
 (167) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Huntsville AL 
 1,098
 2,330
 
 3,428
 (249) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Montgomery AL 
 1,034
 1,413
 
 2,447
 (187) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster Vestavia Hills AL 
 1,257
 1,417
 
 2,674
 (158) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Fort Smith AR 
 1,643
 1,228
 
 2,871
 (176) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Hot Springs AR 
 928
 1,593
 
 2,521
 (235) 7/28/2014 1994
Red Lobster Little Rock AR 
 1,942
 725
 
 2,667
 (118) 7/28/2014 1977


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster North Little Rock AR 
 999
 1,906
 
 2,905
 (229) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Pine Bluff AR 
 226
 1,194
 
 1,420
 (197) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Rogers AR 
 1,398
 2,069
 
 3,467
 (272) 7/28/2014 2008
Red Lobster Chandler AZ 
 
 252
 
 252
 (128) 7/28/2014 2000
Red Lobster Flagstaff AZ 
 891
 514
 
 1,405
 (141) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Gilbert AZ 
 
 460
 
 460
 (164) 7/28/2014 2007
Red Lobster Surprise AZ 
 
 565
 
 565
 (185) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Tucson AZ 
 
 676
 
 676
 (185) 7/28/2014 2009
Red Lobster Bakersfield CA 
 
 731
 
 731
 (211) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Chico CA 
 717
 1,146
 
 1,863
 (187) 7/28/2014 1994
Red Lobster Chula Vista CA 
 
 1,671
 
 1,671
 (280) 7/28/2014 1988
Red Lobster Fremont CA 
 1,638
 564
 
 2,202
 (101) 7/28/2014 1984
Red Lobster Inglewood CA 
 
 2,211
 
 2,211
 (418) 7/28/2014 2007
Red Lobster Oceanside CA 
 
 1,529
 
 1,529
 (268) 7/28/2014 2010
Red Lobster Ontario CA 
 1,304
 2,238
 
 3,542
 (267) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Palm Desert CA 
 1,132
 1,321
 
 2,453
 (215) 7/28/2014 2012
Red Lobster Riverside CA 
 914
 2,459
 
 3,373
 (263) 7/28/2014 1988
Red Lobster San Bruno CA 
 
 1,611
 
 1,611
 (372) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster San Diego CA 
 
 1,113
 
 1,113
 (387) 7/28/2014 1988
Red Lobster Torrance CA 
 1,850
 1,579
 
 3,429
 (185) 7/28/2014 1988
Red Lobster Valencia CA 
 
 841
 
 841
 (302) 7/28/2014 1988
Red Lobster Colorado Springs CO 
 
 1,512
 
 1,512
 (267) 7/28/2014 2004
Red Lobster Bridgeport CT 
 
 323
 
 323
 (133) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Danbury CT 
 
 159
 
 159
 (96) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Newark DE 
 
 1,515
 
 1,515
 (333) 7/28/2014 2006
Red Lobster Talleyville DE 
 1,201
 1,877
 
 3,078
 (241) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Altamonte Springs FL 
 1,212
 1,674
 
 2,886
 (212) 7/28/2014 1986
Red Lobster Boynton Beach FL 
 
 1,631
 
 1,631
 (320) 7/28/2014 2008
Red Lobster Fort Pierce FL 
 618
 1,491
 
 2,109
 (220) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Hollywood FL 
 
 2,282
 
 2,282
 (463) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Kissimmee FL 
 
 1,364
 
 1,364
 (341) 7/28/2014 2002
Red Lobster Leesburg FL 
 721
 1,262
 
 1,983
 (190) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Miami FL 
 
 1,062
 
 1,062
 (310) 7/28/2014 2003


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Orlando FL 
 
 1,188
 
 1,188
 (331) 7/28/2014 1989
Red Lobster Panama City FL 
 
 1,515
 
 1,515
 (296) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Pembroke Pines FL 
 479
 3,126
 
 3,605
 (346) 7/28/2014 1987
Red Lobster Plantation FL 
 1,975
 1,733
 
 3,708
 (229) 7/28/2014 1989
Red Lobster Port Charlotte FL 
 1,476
 1,516
 
 2,992
 (209) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Sebring FL 
 1,003
 1,487
 
 2,490
 (197) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Winter Haven FL 
 1,055
 2,217
 
 3,272
 (220) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Athens GA 
 669
 2,027
 
 2,696
 (206) 7/28/2014 1971
Red Lobster Austell GA 
 
 1,092
 
 1,092
 (233) 7/28/2014 2001
Red Lobster Buford GA 
 1,315
 2,638
 
 3,953
 (317) 7/28/2014 2000
Red Lobster Cartersville GA 
 594
 1,386
 
 1,980
 (199) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Columbus GA 
 956
 1,957
 
 2,913
 (256) 7/28/2014 2005
Red Lobster Conyers GA 
 549
 3,144
 
 3,693
 (361) 7/28/2014 2000
Red Lobster Dalton GA 
 775
 2,045
 
 2,820
 (243) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Decatur GA 
 1,102
 1,873
 
 2,975
 (200) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Douglasville GA 
 1,356
 1,161
 
 2,517
 (174) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Jonesboro GA 
 1,049
 1,678
 
 2,727
 (181) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Kennesaw GA 
 1,382
 1,802
 
 3,184
 (220) 7/28/2014 1987
Red Lobster Perry GA 
 351
 1,839
 
 2,190
 (244) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Rome GA 
 961
 911
 
 1,872
 (135) 7/28/2014 1979
Red Lobster Roswell GA 
 2,358
 354
 
 2,712
 (84) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Savannah GA 
 475
 2,236
 
 2,711
 (232) 7/28/2014 1971
Red Lobster Tucker GA 
 
 1,718
 
 1,718
 (337) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Ames IA 
 789
 1,133
 
 1,922
 (188) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Cedar Rapids IA 
 
 495
 
 495
 (190) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Davenport IA 
 619
 2,896
 
 3,515
 (301) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster West Des Moines IA 
 1,033
 2,358
 
 3,391
 (254) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Boise ID 
 
 714
 
 714
 (203) 7/28/2014 1988
Red Lobster Pocatello ID 
 
 773
 
 773
 (311) 7/28/2014 1994
Red Lobster Alton IL 
 1,251
 1,854
 
 3,105
 (218) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster Aurora IL 
 1,598
 782
 
 2,380
 (116) 7/28/2014 1979
Red Lobster Chicago IL 
 1,064
 2,422
 
 3,486
 (260) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Danville IL 
 253
 1,580
 
 1,833
 (228) 7/28/2014 1991


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Fairview Heights IL 
 
 1,806
 
 1,806
 (629) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Forsyth IL 
 
 1,083
 
 1,083
 (252) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Gurnee IL 
 1,735
 2,286
 
 4,021
 (248) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Marion IL 
 399
 2,399
 
 2,798
 (293) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Matteson IL 
 962
 2,212
 
 3,174
 (231) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Norridge IL 
 
 929
 
 929
 (349) 7/28/2014 1979
Red Lobster Oak Lawn IL 
 1,825
 2,316
 
 4,141
 (241) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Orland Park IL 
 1,046
 2,489
 
 3,535
 (270) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Peru IL 
 339
 1,169
 
 1,508
 (183) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Schaumburg IL 
 
 665
 
 665
 (175) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Springfield IL 
 1,205
 1,253
 
 2,458
 (169) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster West Dundee IL 
 197
 2,195
 
 2,392
 (242) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Anderson IN 
 813
 1,272
 
 2,085
 (167) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Avon IN 
 
 864
 
 864
 (251) 7/28/2014 2001
Red Lobster Columbus IN 
 615
 1,435
 
 2,050
 (202) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Elkhart IN 
 616
 1,657
 
 2,273
 (301) 9/19/2014 1993
Red Lobster Evansville IN 
 587
 3,357
 
 3,944
 (342) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Fort Wayne IN 
 567
 2,985
 
 3,552
 (305) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Kokomo IN 
 394
 1,835
 
 2,229
 (213) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Mishawaka IN 
 593
 2,205
 
 2,798
 (238) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster Muncie IN 
 627
 1,427
 
 2,054
 (146) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Richmond IN 
 371
 1,416
 
 1,787
 (212) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Terre Haute IN 
 1,066
 2,640
 
 3,706
 (275) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Topeka KS 
 754
 2,211
 
 2,965
 (234) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Elizabethtown KY 
 866
 401
 
 1,267
 (138) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Lexington KY 
 
 1,094
 
 1,094
 (246) 7/28/2014 2011
Red Lobster Louisville KY 
 893
 1,350
 
 2,243
 (197) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Owensboro KY 
 815
 1,485
 
 2,300
 (194) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster St. Matthews KY 
 1,640
 1,841
 
 3,481
 (200) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Baton Rouge LA 
 
 1,535
 
 1,535
 (303) 7/28/2014 2011
Red Lobster Monroe LA 
 455
 2,022
 
 2,477
 (254) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Annapolis MD 
 
 644
 
 644
 (147) 7/28/2014 1985
Red Lobster Frederick MD 
 
 319
 
 319
 (144) 7/28/2014 1997


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Lanham MD 
 
 455
 
 455
 (156) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Owings Mills MD 
 
 229
 
 229
 (99) 7/28/2014 1989
Red Lobster Salisbury MD 
 1,070
 1,868
 
 2,938
 (249) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Suitland MD 
 1,090
 3,112
 
 4,202
 (310) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Battle Creek MI 
 202
 1,827
 
 2,029
 (217) 7/28/2014 1979
Red Lobster Dearborn Heights MI 
 822
 2,156
 
 2,978
 (237) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Flint MI 
 505
 2,266
 
 2,771
 (252) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Fort Gratiot MI 
 250
 1,611
 
 1,861
 (245) 7/28/2014 2002
Red Lobster Jackson MI 
 235
 2,174
 
 2,409
 (241) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Kentwood MI 
 819
 1,606
 
 2,425
 (188) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Lansing MI 
 
 1,534
 
 1,534
 (303) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Livonia MI 
 635
 1,824
 
 2,459
 (232) 7/28/2014 1987
Red Lobster Mt. Pleasant MI 
 508
 1,346
 
 1,854
 (202) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Novi MI 
 2,061
 1,847
 
 3,908
 (229) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster Portage MI 
 396
 2,496
 
 2,892
 (264) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Saginaw MI 
 335
 1,961
 
 2,296
 (222) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Southgate MI 
 611
 2,531
 
 3,142
 (301) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Sterling Heights MI 
 759
 3,215
 
 3,974
 (349) 7/28/2014 1985
Red Lobster Traverse City MI 
 1,036
 1,121
 
 2,157
 (190) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Warren MI 
 349
 2,656
 
 3,005
 (279) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Mankato MN 
 867
 1,642
 
 2,509
 (231) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Rochester MN 
 
 1,674
 
 1,674
 (284) 7/28/2014 1987
Red Lobster Roseville MN 
 1,291
 1,298
 
 2,589
 (143) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster St. Cloud MN 
 760
 2,770
 
 3,530
 (301) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Branson MO 
 1,496
 1,074
 
 2,570
 (131) 7/30/2014 2000
Red Lobster Bridgeton MO 
 1,128
 2,003
 
 3,131
 (223) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Cape Girardeau MO 
 1,412
 1,103
 
 2,515
 (186) 7/28/2014 1994
Red Lobster Chesterfield MO 
 
 1,762
 
 1,762
 (379) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Crestwood MO 
 518
 1,466
 
 1,984
 (171) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Jefferson City MO 
 593
 1,092
 
 1,685
 (153) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Springfield MO 
 
 1,510
 
 1,510
 (456) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster St. Joseph MO 
 1,023
 1,002
 
 2,025
 (139) 7/28/2014 1979


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster St. Peters MO 
 
 1,543
 
 1,543
 (476) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster St.Louis MO 
 1,387
 2,662
 
 4,049
 (271) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Jackson MS 
 1,128
 2,851
 
 3,979
 (304) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Meridian MS 
 
 872
 
 872
 (207) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Southaven MS 
 668
 2,640
 
 3,308
 (265) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Asheville NC 
 544
 2,865
 
 3,409
 (303) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Burlington NC 
 1,208
 403
 
 1,611
 (150) 7/28/2014 2011
Red Lobster Cary NC 
 1,933
 1,118
 
 3,051
 (182) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Concord NC 
 
 1,506
 
 1,506
 (359) 7/28/2014 2002
Red Lobster Fayetteville NC 
 675
 2,908
 
 3,583
 (276) 7/28/2014 1978
Red Lobster Greensboro NC 
 1,372
 1,785
 
 3,157
 (200) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Raleigh NC 
 946
 2,183
 
 3,129
 (224) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster Bismarck ND 
 831
 3,321
 
 4,152
 (339) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Fargo ND 
 888
 2,933
 
 3,821
 (312) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Grand Forks ND 
 876
 1,694
 
 2,570
 (233) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Kearney NE 
 678
 1,109
 
 1,787
 (186) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Lincoln NE 
 
 254
 
 254
 (90) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Cherry Hill NJ 
 
 2,274
 
 2,274
 (520) 7/28/2014 1984
Red Lobster Deptford NJ 
 
 1,608
 
 1,608
 (390) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Vineland NJ 
 
 1,779
 
 1,779
 (319) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Clovis NM 
 
 318
 
 318
 (126) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Farmington NM 
 855
 2,287
 
 3,142
 (281) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Amherst NY 
 1,344
 1,271
 
 2,615
 (184) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Brooklyn NY 
 
 5,897
 
 5,897
 (1,190) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Henrietta NY 
 956
 2,934
 
 3,890
 (315) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Hicksville NY 
 
 870
 
 870
 (214) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Liverpool NY 
 900
 2,088
 
 2,988
 (237) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Poughkeepsie NY 
 1,987
 669
 
 2,656
 (111) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Rochester NY 
 756
 2,122
 
 2,878
 (268) 7/28/2014 1985
Red Lobster Ronkonkoma NY 
 
 1,109
 
 1,109
 (268) 7/28/2014 2005
Red Lobster Valley Stream NY 
 
 1,417
 
 1,417
 (354) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster Vestal NY 
 1,027
 2,255
 
 3,282
 (250) 7/28/2014 1976


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Watertown NY 
 807
 1,586
 
 2,393
 (231) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Yonkers NY 
 
 894
 
 894
 (224) 7/28/2014 2012
Red Lobster Akron OH 
 
 1,398
 
 1,398
 (324) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Beavercreek OH 
 551
 2,334
 
 2,885
 (285) 7/28/2014 1994
Red Lobster Canton OH 
 398
 2,596
 
 2,994
 (262) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster Cincinnati OH 
 1,484
 1,687
 
 3,171
 (180) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Cincinnati OH 
 365
 2,344
 
 2,709
 (243) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Columbus OH 
 
 1,100
 
 1,100
 (284) 7/28/2014 2002
Red Lobster Columbus OH 
 787
 2,123
 
 2,910
 (222) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Cuyahoga Falls OH 
 306
 2,511
 
 2,817
 (254) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster Dublin OH 
 
 873
 
 873
 (198) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Lancaster OH 
 737
 1,570
 
 2,307
 (204) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Lima OH 
 843
 658
 
 1,501
 (140) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Mansfield OH 
 335
 1,697
 
 2,032
 (192) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Mentor OH 
 651
 2,129
 
 2,780
 (232) 7/30/2014 1977
Red Lobster Miamisburg OH 
 612
 2,615
 
 3,227
 (251) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster New Philadelphia OH 
 232
 1,349
 
 1,581
 (195) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Niles OH 
 
 1,799
 
 1,799
 (361) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster North Olmsted OH 
 
 2,291
 
 2,291
 (402) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster Parma OH 
 466
 2,156
 
 2,622
 (227) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Sandusky OH 
 1,290
 1,126
 
 2,416
 (163) 7/30/2014 1986
Red Lobster St. Clairsville OH 
 
 853
 
 853
 (300) 7/28/2014 1997
Red Lobster Wooster OH 
 200
 1,205
 
 1,405
 (188) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Youngstown OH 
 214
 2,477
 
 2,691
 (268) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Muskogee OK 
 399
 1,707
 
 2,106
 (233) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Oklahoma City OK 
 610
 2,681
 
 3,291
 (275) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Oklahoma City OK 
 800
 1,960
 
 2,760
 (235) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Shawnee OK 
 437
 1,744
 
 2,181
 (218) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster London ON 
 1,502
 649
 
 2,151
 (156) 7/28/2014 1986
Red Lobster Bartonsville PA 
 
 2,389
 
 2,389
 (419) 7/28/2014 2010
Red Lobster Chambersburg PA 
 694
 1,212
 
 1,906
 (191) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Du Bois PA 
 317
 981
 
 1,298
 (168) 7/28/2014 1995


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Greensburg PA 
 748
 2,432
 
 3,180
 (266) 7/28/2014 1989
Red Lobster Hanover PA 
 446
 1,870
 
 2,316
 (246) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Lancaster PA 
 
 2,968
 
 2,968
 (450) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Langhorne PA 
 979
 2,735
 
 3,714
 (328) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Mechanicsburg PA 
 676
 2,656
 
 3,332
 (280) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Philadelphia PA 
 
 1,902
 
 1,902
 (301) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Pittsburgh PA 
 
 1,379
 
 1,379
 (328) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Pittsburgh PA 
 1,352
 1,190
 
 2,542
 (141) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Pittsburgh PA 
 1,641
 1,096
 
 2,737
 (146) 7/28/2014 1987
Red Lobster Pottstown PA 
 
 1,115
 
 1,115
 (419) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Scranton PA 
 
 1,563
 
 1,563
 (405) 7/28/2014 2001
Red Lobster Springfield PA 
 1,571
 2,344
 
 3,915
 (282) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster State College PA 
 
 1,026
 
 1,026
 (340) 7/28/2014 1999
Red Lobster Washington PA 
 
 694
 
 694
 (155) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Whitehall PA 
 
 2,155
 
 2,155
 (530) 7/28/2014 1977
Red Lobster Aiken SC 
 780
 1,247
 
 2,027
 (183) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Columbia SC 
 
 918
 
 918
 (210) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Florence SC 
 779
 1,506
 
 2,285
 (209) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Myrtle Beach SC 
 
 462
 
 462
 (171) 7/28/2014 2006
Red Lobster Spartanburg SC 
 
 1,136
 
 1,136
 (206) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Sumter SC 
 988
 1,117
 
 2,105
 (187) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Chattanooga TN 
 1,548
 2,575
 
 4,123
 (247) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Clarksville TN 
 543
 2,223
 
 2,766
 (253) 7/28/2014 1990
Red Lobster Jackson TN 
 822
 1,427
 
 2,249
 (214) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Memphis TN 
 1,602
 2,290
 
 3,892
 (237) 7/28/2014 1972
Red Lobster Sevierville TN 
 
 1,062
 
 1,062
 (287) 7/28/2014 2002
Red Lobster Abilene TX 
 209
 1,976
 
 2,185
 (224) 7/30/2014 1980
Red Lobster Amarillo TX 
 590
 2,342
 
 2,932
 (248) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Burleson TX 
 
 356
 
 356
 (147) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster College Station TX 
 
 643
 
 643
 (156) 7/28/2014 1983
Red Lobster Conroe TX 
 
 557
 
 557
 (177) 7/28/2014 2011
Red Lobster Denton TX 
 832
 2,044
 
 2,876
 (263) 7/28/2014 1991


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Duncanville TX 
 361
 2,658
 
 3,019
 (272) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster El Paso TX 
 
 414
 
 414
 (162) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster El Paso TX 
 
 883
 
 883
 (210) 7/28/2014 2008
Red Lobster Fort Worth TX 
 
 239
 
 239
 (93) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Houston TX 
 
 399
 
 399
 (156) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster Houston TX 
 960
 1,833
 
 2,793
 (209) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Humble TX 
 
 1,087
 
 1,087
 (225) 7/28/2014 1980
Red Lobster Killeen TX 
 732
 1,935
 
 2,667
 (242) 7/28/2014 1991
Red Lobster Laredo TX 
 
 819
 
 819
 (235) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Lewisville TX 
 1,087
 1,626
 (106) 2,607
 (180) 7/28/2014 1973
Red Lobster Longview TX 
 324
 2,625
 
 2,949
 (284) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Lubbock TX 
 1,103
 1,494
 
 2,597
 (179) 7/28/2014 1976
Red Lobster Lufkin TX 
 15
 1,732
 
 1,747
 (232) 7/28/2014 1996
Red Lobster Mcallen TX 
 1,175
 2,280
 
 3,455
 (257) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Mcallen TX 
 960
 1,647
 
 2,607
 (248) 7/28/2014 2010
Red Lobster N. Richland Hills TX 
 493
 2,889
 
 3,382
 (302) 7/28/2014 1978
Red Lobster San Antonio TX 
 
 963
 
 963
 (170) 7/28/2014 1974
Red Lobster Sugar Land TX 
 
 708
 
 708
 (158) 7/28/2014 1981
Red Lobster Texarkana TX 
 73
 2,148
 
 2,221
 (257) 7/28/2014 1986
Red Lobster Tyler TX 
 884
 1,755
 
 2,639
 (209) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Victoria TX 
 478
 1,905
 
 2,383
 (224) 7/28/2014 1984
Red Lobster Layton UT 
 1,577
 1,333
 
 2,910
 (209) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Bristol VA 
 816
 1,175
 
 1,991
 (179) 7/28/2014 2005
Red Lobster Charlottesville VA 
 
 1,021
 
 1,021
 (202) 7/28/2014 1986
Red Lobster Chesapeake VA 
 1,262
 1,374
 
 2,636
 (176) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Lobster Harrisonburg VA 
 465
 1,369
 
 1,834
 (212) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Manassas VA 
 1,800
 941
 
 2,741
 (155) 7/28/2014 1993
Red Lobster Midlothian VA 
 
 655
 
 655
 (211) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Sterling VA 
 
 646
 
 646
 (206) 7/28/2014 2001
Red Lobster Winchester VA 
 
 357
 
 357
 (145) 7/28/2014 2006
Red Lobster Olympia WA 
 
 596
 
 596
 (238) 7/28/2014 1995
Red Lobster Silverdale WA 
 1,661
 501
 
 2,162
 (127) 7/28/2014 1993


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Red Lobster Spokane WA 
 
 1,427
 
 1,427
 (289) 7/28/2014 2009
Red Lobster Ashwaubenon WI 
 1,270
 1,116
 
 2,386
 (151) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Eau Claire WI 
 527
 1,534
 
 2,061
 (206) 7/28/2014 1982
Red Lobster Greenfield WI 
 1,823
 1,673
 
 3,496
 (191) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Mt. Pleasant WI 
 856
 1,773
 
 2,629
 (270) 7/28/2014 2012
Red Lobster Wauwatosa WI 
 1,524
 997
 
 2,521
 (138) 7/28/2014 1975
Red Lobster Charleston WV 
 
 1,100
 
 1,100
 (288) 7/28/2014 2003
Red Lobster Huntington WV 
 344
 2,552
 
 2,896
 (297) 7/28/2014 1985
Red Lobster Morgantown WV 
 1,252
 1,477
 
 2,729
 (225) 7/28/2014 2009
Red Lobster Parkersburg WV 
 654
 1,447
 
 2,101
 (221) 7/28/2014 1994
Red Lobster Casper WY 
 1,014
 1,337
 
 2,351
 (233) 7/28/2014 2011
Red Lobster Cheyenne WY 
 1,514
 640
 
 2,154
 (79) 7/28/2014 1992
Red Oak Village San Marcos TX 12,480
 5,287
 20,357
 171
 25,815
 (4,006) 2/7/2014 2006
Reef Services, LLC Gainesville TX 
 86
 285
 
 371
 (46) 6/25/2014 2009
Ridley Pointe Smyrna TN 
 2,009
 9,467
 109
 11,585
 (103) 8/25/2017 2016
Rite Aid Talladega AL 
 377
 1,311
 
 1,688
 (316) 1/8/2014 1997
Rite Aid Bear DE 
 851
 2,702
 
 3,553
 (662) 1/8/2014 1999
Rite Aid Tucker GA 
 793
 1,419
 
 2,212
 (341) 1/8/2014 1996
Rite Aid Jeffersonville IN 
 824
 2,472
 
 3,296
 (751) 11/30/2012 2008
Rite Aid Lawrenceburg KY 
 567
 2,267
 
 2,834
 (689) 11/30/2012 2008
Rite Aid Lexington KY 
 
 1,943
 
 1,943
 (590) 11/30/2012 2007
Rite Aid Paris KY 
 743
 2,228
 
 2,971
 (677) 11/30/2012 2008
Rite Aid Scottsville KY 
 153
 2,904
 
 3,057
 (882) 11/30/2012 2007
Rite Aid Stanford KY 
 152
 2,886
 
 3,038
 (876) 11/30/2012 2009
Rite Aid Adams MA 
 300
 1,200
 
 1,500
 (321) 7/30/2013 1958
Rite Aid Bangor ME 
 724
 2,896
 
 3,620
 (643) 5/19/2014 1998
Rite Aid Buxton ME 
 
 
 2,131
 2,131
 (375) 5/19/2014 1997
Rite Aid Dover-Foxcroft ME 
 256
 2,659
 
 2,915
 (653) 1/8/2014 1999
Rite Aid Fort Fairfield ME 
 117
 1,821
 76
 2,014
 (451) 1/8/2014 1998
Rite Aid Fort Kent ME 
 387
 2,064
 
 2,451
 (496) 1/8/2014 1999


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Rite Aid Van Buren ME 
 115
 1,720
 
 1,835
 (425) 1/8/2014 1998
Rite Aid Bay City MI 
 463
 1,629
 62
 2,154
 (316) 6/24/2014 1996
Rite Aid Burton MI 
 128
 2,541
 (50) 2,619
 (674) 7/26/2013 1999
Rite Aid West Branch MI 
 418
 1,280
 70
 1,768
 (269) 6/23/2014 1996
Rite Aid Burlington NC 
 973
 2,726
 
 3,699
 (669) 1/8/2014 2000
Rite Aid Wilson NC 
 573
 1,337
 
 1,910
 (358) 7/30/2013 2002
Rite Aid Bristol NH 
 395
 1,461
 52
 1,908
 (364) 1/8/2014 1997
Rite Aid Winchester NH 
 343
 1,868
 
 2,211
 (460) 1/8/2014 1998
Rite Aid Cheektowaga NY 
 436
 3,466
 
 3,902
 (767) 2/7/2014 2000
Rite Aid Genoa OH 
 405
 1,845
 
 2,250
 (442) 1/8/2014 1998
Rite Aid Lima OH 
 576
 2,304
 
 2,880
 (700) 11/13/2012 2006
Rite Aid Louisville OH 
 576
 3,266
 
 3,842
 (1,000) 10/31/2012 2008
Rite Aid Marion OH 
 508
 2,877
 
 3,385
 (874) 11/13/2012 2006
Rite Aid St. Marys OH 
 581
 2,322
 
 2,903
 (501) 5/19/2014 2005
Rite Aid Warren OH 
 668
 2,670
 62
 3,400
 (590) 5/19/2014 1999
Rite Aid Wheelersburg OH 
 361
 1,444
 65
 1,870
 (329) 5/19/2014 1998
Rite Aid Meadville PA 
 193
 2,521
 
 2,714
 (602) 1/8/2014 1999
Rite Aid Philadelphia PA 
 633
 2,531
 
 3,164
 (567) 5/19/2014 1999
Rite Aid Spartanburg SC 
 894
 3,575
 
 4,469
 (771) 5/19/2014 2004
Rite Aid Travelers Rest SC 
 882
 3,527
 
 4,409
 (761) 5/19/2014 2005
Rite Aid Memphis TN 
 266
 1,062
 54
 1,382
 (244) 5/19/2014 2000
Rite Aid Murfreesboro TN 
 454
 1,817
 
 2,271
 (392) 5/19/2014 1999
Rite Aid Hayes VA 
 812
 3,247
 
 4,059
 (701) 5/19/2014 2005
Rite Aid Huntington WV 
 964
 2,250
 
 3,214
 (684) 11/30/2012 2008
Road Ranger Winnebago IL 
 707
 3,202
 
 3,909
 (716) 2/7/2014 1998
Rockwell Collins Sterling VA 
 4,285
 29,802
 823
 34,910
 (4,928) 6/30/2014 2011
Ross Austin TX 
 658
 2,631
 700
 3,989
 (726) 5/19/2014 2002
Ross Port Arthur TX 8,077
 3,331
 14,992
 
 18,323
 (2,887) 2/7/2014 2008
Rubbermaid Winfield KS 
 819
 15,555
 
 16,374
 (4,816) 11/28/2012 2012
Rubbermaid Winfield KS 
 1,056
 20,060
 
 21,116
 (6,644) 4/25/2012 2008
Rubbermaid Bowling Green OH 
 714
 13,564
 
 14,278
 (3,689) 7/29/2013 2013
Rubbermaid Brimfield OH 
 1,552
 29,495
 
 31,047
 (8,921) 1/31/2013 2012


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Ruby Tuesday Dillon CO 
 400
 1,628
 
 2,028
 (416) 6/27/2013 1995
Ruby Tuesday Bartow FL 
 270
 1,916
 
 2,186
 (490) 6/27/2013 1995
Ruby Tuesday Orlando FL 
 1,286
 
 (710) 576
 
 7/31/2013 1998
Ruby Tuesday Somerset KY 
 480
 1,120
 
 1,600
 (286) 6/27/2013 1995
Ryan's Buffet Commerce GA 
 962
 1,470
 (647) 1,785
 (203) 2/7/2014 1996
Ryan's Buffet Rome GA 
 831
 1,848
 (919) 1,760
 (207) 2/7/2014 1983
Ryan's Buffet Asheville NC 
 1,261
 2,204
 (1,179) 2,286
 (259) 2/7/2014 1996
Ryan's Buffet Clarksburg WV 
 
 1,639
 (1,305) 334
 (48) 1/8/2014 2001
Salty's Jasper AL 
 140
 219
 
 359
 (56) 6/27/2013 1995
The Salvation Army Houston TX 
 2,640
 10,559
 
 13,199
 (2,162) 5/19/2014 2004
Sam's Club Hoover AL 
 2,253
 9,606
 
 11,859
 (1,825) 2/7/2014 1989
Sam's Club Colorado Springs CO 
 3,347
 12,652
 
 15,999
 (2,366) 2/7/2014 1998
Sam's Club Douglasville GA 
 1,701
 11,052
 
 12,753
 (1,926) 2/7/2014 1999
Sam's Southern Eatery Kennesaw GA 
 210
 46
 
 256
 (12) 6/27/2013 1995
Santa Rosa Commons Pace FL 13,000
 4,447
 21,884
 58
 26,389
 (4,110) 2/7/2014 2008
Savers Austin TX 
 740
 2,958
 
 3,698
 (609) 5/19/2014 2002
Schlotzsky's Colorado Springs CO 
 530
 530
 
 1,060
 (133) 6/27/2013 1997
Schmitz & Schmitz Gainesville TX 
 29
 1,950
 
 1,979
 (262) 6/25/2014 1930
Scotts Company Orrville OH 
 278
 2,502
 
 2,780
 (790) 9/28/2012 1950
Scotts Company Orrville OH 
 611
 1,134
 
 1,745
 (365) 7/30/2012 1950
Scotts Company Orrville OH 
 609
 11,576
 
 12,185
 (3,727) 7/30/2012 2006
SCP Distributors North Little Rock AR 
 258
 1,665
 (9) 1,914
 (229) 11/20/2014 2006
SCP Distributors Knoxville TN 
 251
 900
 
 1,151
 (145) 11/20/2014 2012
Sedwick Claims Management Serv Dublin OH 
 945
 8,520
 
 9,465
 (1,451) 6/26/2014 1997
Select Energy Services Damascus AR 
 530
 800
 
 1,330
 (238) 6/12/2014 2009
Select Energy Services Frierson LA 
 260
 4,954
 
 5,214
 (787) 6/12/2014 2010
Select Energy Services Alderson OK 
 260
 1,150
 
 1,410
 (229) 6/12/2014 2008
Select Energy Services Big Wells TX 
 353
 1,820
 
 2,173
 (291) 6/12/2014 2011
Select Energy Services Chireno TX 
 388
 5,470
 
 5,858
 (861) 6/25/2014 2011
Select Energy Services Cleburne TX 
 154
 2,333
 
 2,487
 (374) 6/25/2014 2008
Select Energy Services Dilley TX 
 308
 1,416
 
 1,724
 (237) 6/25/2014 2012
Select Energy Services Odessa TX 
 460
 1,998
 
 2,458
 (353) 6/25/2014 1982


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Senor Panchos Orrville OH 
 99
 176
 
 275
 (46) 6/27/2013 1990
Shale Tank Truck Cleburne TX 
 476
 547
 
 1,023
 (96) 6/25/2014 2007
Shale Tank Truck Midland TX 
 757
 939
 
 1,696
 (173) 6/25/2014 2012
Sherwin-Williams Angola IN 
 249
 996
 
 1,245
 (202) 5/19/2014 2001
Sherwin-Williams Muskegon MI 
 187
 1,524
 
 1,711
 (315) 2/7/2014 2008
Sherwin-Williams Ashtabula OH 
 176
 704
 
 880
 (116) 5/19/2014 2003
Sherwin-Williams Boardman OH 
 206
 825
 
 1,031
 (136) 5/19/2014 2003
Shoney's Gadsden AL 
 220
 707
 
 927
 (181) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Oxford AL 
 670
 25
 
 695
 (6) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Grayson KY 
 420
 406
 
 826
 (104) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Grenada MS 
 270
 809
 
 1,079
 (190) 7/31/2013 1995
Shoney's Hattiesburg MS 
 730
 618
 
 1,348
 (158) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Jackson MS 
 360
 572
 
 932
 (146) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Summerville SC 
 350
 800
 
 1,150
 (204) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Cookeville TN 
 510
 760
 
 1,270
 (194) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Lawrenceburg TN 
 330
 873
 
 1,203
 (223) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Charleston WV 
 190
 543
 
 733
 (139) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Lewisburg WV 
 110
 642
 
 752
 (164) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Princeton WV 
 90
 593
 
 683
 (152) 6/27/2013 1995
Shoney's Ripley WV 
 200
 599
 
 799
 (153) 6/27/2013 1995
Shopko Hometown L'Anse MI 
 382
 1,736
 
 2,118
 (371) 5/13/2014 2009
Sierra Pines The Woodlands TX 14,941
 5,219
 19,196
 6,893
 31,308
 (1,974) 11/5/2013 2014
Smokey Bones Morrow GA 
 390
 2,184
 
 2,574
 (558) 6/27/2013 1995
Smokey Bones Pittsburgh PA 
 1,490
 390
 
 1,880
 (113) 7/28/2014 2000
Sonic Drive-In Wadesboro NC 
 137
 266
 
 403
 (67) 6/27/2013 2007
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Venice FL 
 338
 507
 
 845
 (134) 7/31/2013 1978
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Athens GA 
 460
 1,280
 
 1,740
 (327) 6/27/2013 1995
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Conyers GA 
 450
 663
 
 1,113
 (169) 6/27/2013 1995
Sonny's Real Pit BBQ Marietta GA 
 290
 1,772
 
 2,062
 (453) 6/27/2013 1995
Southern Kitchen Prattville AL 
 1,038
 1,802
 (1,871) 969
 (79) 2/7/2014 1997
Sovereign Bank Linden NJ 
 601
 2,329
 
 2,930
 (516) 1/8/2014 1945
Sovereign Bank Kennett Square PA 
 837
 2,412
 
 3,249
 (536) 1/8/2014 1963


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Spaghetti Warehouse Arlington TX 
 630
 1,400
 
 2,030
 (358) 6/27/2013 1995
Spaghetti Warehouse San Antonio TX 
 1,140
 1,434
 (1,063) 1,511
 (53) 6/27/2013 1995
Sprouts Centennial CO 
 1,581
 6,394
 
 7,975
 (1,407) 2/7/2014 2009
St. Luke's Urgent Care Creve Coeur MO 
 1,644
 4,497
 
 6,141
 (1,022) 2/7/2014 2010
Staples Pensacola FL 
 1,539
 3,354
 
 4,893
 (598) 2/7/2014 2010
Staples Helena MT 
 1,159
 2,452
 
 3,611
 (465) 2/7/2014 2012
Staples Houston TX 1,815
 1,169
 3,192
 
 4,361
 (573) 2/7/2014 2008
Starbucks Las Vegas NV 
 680
 1,533
 
 2,213
 (379) 6/27/2013 1995
Steak 'n Shake Tampa FL 
 951
 
 785
 1,736
 (39) 7/31/2013 1999
Stearns Crossing Bartlett IL 7,060
 4,437
 5,970
 376
 10,783
 (1,517) 2/7/2014 1999
Stop & Shop Levittown PA 
 4,716
 9,955
 
 14,671
 (2,050) 11/5/2013 1995
Stop & Shop Cranston RI 
 4,309
 
 
 4,309
 
 2/7/2014 2011
Stripes Portales NM 
 306
 2,595
 
 2,901
 (610) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Andrews TX 
 406
 2,302
 
 2,708
 (630) 2/15/2013 2008
Stripes Brady TX 
 203
 3,205
 
 3,408
 (691) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Brownsville TX 
 613
 3,195
 
 3,808
 (707) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Carrizo Springs TX 
 496
 2,526
 
 3,022
 (610) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Corpus Christi TX 
 681
 2,047
 
 2,728
 (461) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Corpus Christi TX 
 1,011
 3,125
 
 4,136
 (696) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Corpus Christi TX 
 803
 3,109
 
 3,912
 (693) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Eagle Pass TX 
 762
 2,453
 
 3,215
 (555) 2/7/2014 2009
Stripes Edinburg TX 
 1,286
 1,546
 
 2,832
 (352) 2/7/2014 1999
Stripes Edinburg TX 
 488
 2,499
 
 2,987
 (598) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Edinburg TX 
 450
 2,818
 
 3,268
 (564) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes Fort Stockton TX 
 1,237
 3,812
 
 5,049
 (992) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Haskell TX 
 143
 2,554
 
 2,697
 (596) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Houston TX 
 1,204
 2,069
 
 3,273
 (450) 2/7/2014 2007
Stripes La Feria TX 
 219
 1,970
 
 2,189
 (540) 2/15/2013 2008
Stripes Laredo TX 
 581
 2,367
 
 2,948
 (563) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Laredo TX 
 626
 2,338
 
 2,964
 (567) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Midland TX 
 1,098
 4,857
 
 5,955
 (1,070) 2/7/2014 2006
Stripes Mission TX 
 742
 550
 
 1,292
 (117) 2/7/2014 1986


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Stripes Mission TX 
 1,007
 3,178
 (33) 4,152
 (660) 2/7/2014 2003
Stripes Odessa TX 
 301
 2,895
 
 3,196
 (647) 2/7/2014 2011
Stripes Odessa TX 
 803
 3,596
 
 4,399
 (1,155) 2/7/2014 1998
Stripes Pharr TX 
 281
 2,531
 
 2,812
 (693) 2/15/2013 1995
Stripes Ranchito TX 
 498
 2,671
 
 3,169
 (588) 2/7/2014 2010
Stripes Rio Hondo TX 
 293
 2,640
 
 2,933
 (723) 2/15/2013 2008
Stripes San Angelo TX 
 772
 4,025
 
 4,797
 (889) 2/7/2014 1997
Stripes San Angelo TX 
 1,006
 3,277
 
 4,283
 (728) 2/7/2014 2007
Subway Knoxville TN 
 160
 349
 
 509
 (86) 6/27/2013 1995
Sun Trust Bank Coral Springs FL 
 654
 1,525
 
 2,179
 (385) 4/12/2013 1996
Sun Trust Bank Destin FL 
 572
 1,717
 
 2,289
 (433) 4/12/2013 1998
Sun Trust Bank Dunedin FL 
 479
 1,917
 
 2,396
 (492) 3/22/2013 1995
Sun Trust Bank Dunnellon FL 
 82
 463
 
 545
 (119) 3/22/2013 1980
Sun Trust Bank Kissimmee FL 
 1,167
 778
 
 1,945
 (196) 4/12/2013 1981
Sun Trust Bank Lakeland FL 
 598
 1,110
 
 1,708
 (280) 4/12/2013 1988
Sun Trust Bank North Port FL 
 460
 1,381
 
 1,841
 (355) 3/22/2013 1982
Sun Trust Bank Palm Harbor FL 
 535
 1,249
 
 1,784
 (315) 4/12/2013 1994
Sun Trust Bank Plant City FL 
 751
 1,753
 
 2,504
 (450) 3/22/2013 2000
Sun Trust Bank Port Orange FL 
 590
 1,095
 
 1,685
 (281) 3/22/2013 1989
Sun Trust Bank Port Orange FL 
 563
 1,314
 
 1,877
 (337) 3/22/2013 1982
Sun Trust Bank S. Daytona Beach FL 
 592
 1,099
 
 1,691
 (277) 4/12/2013 1985
Sun Trust Bank West Palm Beach FL 
 1,026
 1,026
 
 2,052
 (263) 3/22/2013 1981
Sun Trust Bank Atlanta GA 
 1,018
 1,527
 
 2,545
 (385) 4/12/2013 1965
Sun Trust Bank Atlanta GA 
 1,435
 478
 
 1,913
 (121) 4/12/2013 1970
Sun Trust Bank Dunwoody GA 
 1,784
 1,460
 
 3,244
 (375) 3/22/2013 1972
Sun Trust Bank Jesup GA 
 184
 1,657
 
 1,841
 (425) 3/22/2013 1964
Sun Trust Bank St. Simons Island GA 
 1,363
 734
 
 2,097
 (188) 3/22/2013 1975
Sun Trust Bank Annapolis MD 
 2,653
 2,170
 
 4,823
 (518) 7/23/2013 1976
Sun Trust Bank Ellicott City MD 
 1,728
 931
 
 2,659
 (239) 3/22/2013 1975
Sun Trust Bank Frederick MD 
 991
 991
 
 1,982
 (250) 4/26/2013 1880
Sun Trust Bank Waldorf MD 
 523
 2,962
 
 3,485
 (761) 3/22/2013 1964
Sun Trust Bank Belmont NC 
 616
 924
 
 1,540
 (237) 3/22/2013 1970


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Sun Trust Bank Carrboro NC 
 512
 512
 
 1,024
 (129) 4/12/2013 1980
Sun Trust Bank Concord NC 
 707
 707
 
 1,414
 (178) 4/12/2013 1988
Sun Trust Bank Durham NC 
 747
 1,388
 
 2,135
 (350) 4/12/2013 1973
Sun Trust Bank Greensboro NC 
 403
 748
 
 1,151
 (189) 4/12/2013 1962
Sun Trust Bank Lexington NC 
 447
 831
 
 1,278
 (210) 4/12/2013 2001
Sun Trust Bank Matthews NC 
 382
 382
 
 764
 (98) 3/22/2013 1971
Sun Trust Bank Mocksville NC 
 978
 2,933
 
 3,911
 (753) 3/22/2013 2000
Sun Trust Bank Raleigh NC 
 658
 658
 
 1,316
 (169) 3/22/2013 1977
Sun Trust Bank Chattanooga TN 
 223
 1,263
 
 1,486
 (324) 3/22/2013 1953
Sun Trust Bank Madison TN 
 286
 1,143
 
 1,429
 (293) 3/22/2013 1953
Sun Trust Bank Nashville TN 
 567
 305
 
 872
 (73) 7/23/2013 1954
Sun Trust Bank Nashville TN 
 1,598
 1,308
 
 2,906
 (330) 4/12/2013 1992
Sun Trust Bank Nashville TN 
 613
 613
 
 1,226
 (155) 4/12/2013 1970
Sun Trust Bank Cheriton VA 
 90
 510
 
 600
 (131) 3/22/2013 1975


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Sun Trust Bank Lynchburg VA 
 251
 466
 
 717
 (120) 3/22/2013 1973
Sun Trust Bank Petersburg VA 
 102
 306
 
 408
 (77) 4/12/2013 1975
Sun Trust Bank Richmond VA 
 277
 416
 
 693
 (107) 3/22/2013 1959
Sun Trust Bank Richmond VA 
 224
 2,012
 
 2,236
 (507) 4/12/2013 1909
Sun Trust Bank Rocky Mount VA 
 265
 1,504
 
 1,769
 (373) 5/22/2013 1961
Sunbelt Rental Mabelvale AR 
 240
 894
 
 1,134
 (160) 6/4/2014 2006
Sunbelt Rental Memphis TN 
 365
 929
 128
 1,422
 (173) 9/26/2014 1995
Sunoco Merritt Island FL 
 540
 2,162
 
 2,702
 (355) 5/19/2014 2009
Sunset Valley Homestead Sunset Valley TX 16,894
 14,283
 28,351
 47
 42,681
 (5,530) 2/7/2014 2007
Superior Energy Services Gainesville TX 
 284
 10,475
 (3) 10,756
 (5,380) 7/24/2014 1982
Sweet Tomato Coral Springs FL 
 790
 1,625
 
 2,415
 (415) 6/27/2013 1995
Synovus Bank Tampa FL 
 985
 2,298
 
 3,283
 (618) 12/31/2012 1959
Sysmex Lincolnshire IL 22,500
 4,143
 36,987
 5
 41,135
 (6,983) 2/7/2014 2010
Taco Bell Albertville AL 
 419
 778
 
 1,197
 (183) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell Cullman AL 
 375
 1,053
 
 1,428
 (265) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Daphne AL 
 180
 1,278
 
 1,458
 (316) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Dora AL 
 348
 813
 
 1,161
 (191) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell Foley AL 
 360
 1,460
 
 1,820
 (361) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Hartselle AL 
 378
 781
 
 1,159
 (196) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Jasper AL 
 445
 814
 
 1,259
 (205) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Mobile AL 
 160
 1,973
 
 2,133
 (487) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Saraland AL 
 150
 1,063
 
 1,213
 (263) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Warrior AL 
 364
 675
 
 1,039
 (159) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell Winfield AL 
 278
 834
 
 1,112
 (196) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell Corona CA 
 306
 1,138
 
 1,444
 (286) 6/27/2013 1990
Taco Bell Fairfield CA 
 500
 1,327
 
 1,827
 (334) 6/27/2013 1985
Taco Bell Fontana CA 
 524
 1,016
 
 1,540
 (256) 6/27/2013 1992
Taco Bell Montclair CA 
 322
 900
 
 1,222
 (227) 6/27/2013 1996
Taco Bell Moreno Valley CA 
 367
 998
 
 1,365
 (251) 6/27/2013 1992
Taco Bell Rancho Cucamonga CA 
 415
 1,210
 
 1,625
 (305) 6/27/2013 1992
Taco Bell Rubidoux CA 
 415
 1,223
 
 1,638
 (308) 6/27/2013 1992
Taco Bell Suisun City CA 
 355
 1,419
 
 1,774
 (334) 7/31/2013 1986


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Taco Bell Vacaville CA 
 522
 1,513
 
 2,035
 (381) 6/27/2013 1985
Taco Bell Vacaville CA 
 1,184
 1,375
 
 2,559
 (346) 6/27/2013 1994
Taco Bell Jacksonville FL 
 440
 1,167
 
 1,607
 (288) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Jacksonville FL 
 340
 1,383
 
 1,723
 (342) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Pensacola FL 
 140
 1,897
 
 2,037
 (469) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Augusta GA 
 220
 1,292
 
 1,512
 (319) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Hephzibah GA 
 330
 930
 
 1,260
 (230) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Jesup GA 
 230
 715
 
 945
 (177) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Kennesaw GA 
 162
 601
 
 763
 (151) 6/27/2013 1984
Taco Bell Waycross GA 
 170
 1,115
 
 1,285
 (275) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Crawfordsville IN 
 234
 934
 
 1,168
 (220) 7/31/2013 1991
Taco Bell Hartford City IN 
 99
 889
 
 988
 (209) 7/31/2013 1978
Taco Bell Kokomo IN 
 199
 798
 
 997
 (188) 7/31/2013 1993
Taco Bell Lafayette IN 
 304
 912
 
 1,216
 (215) 7/31/2013 1990
Taco Bell Marion IN 
 496
 921
 
 1,417
 (217) 7/31/2013 1994
Taco Bell Noblesville IN 
 363
 545
 
 908
 (128) 7/31/2013 2005
Taco Bell Tipton IN 
 104
 936
 
 1,040
 (220) 7/31/2013 1998
Taco Bell North Corbin KY 
 139
 1,082
 
 1,221
 (272) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Detroit MI 
 124
 704
 
 828
 (166) 7/31/2013 1989
Taco Bell St. Louis MO 
 190
 1,951
 
 2,141
 (430) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Wentzville MO 
 410
 1,168
 
 1,578
 (289) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Brunswick OH 
 400
 1,267
 
 1,667
 (313) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Dayton OH 
 129
 732
 
 861
 (172) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell North Olmstead OH 
 390
 904
 
 1,294
 (223) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Kingston TN 
 280
 714
 
 994
 (177) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell Dallas TX 
 400
 1,225
 
 1,625
 (303) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bell / KFC Texarkana AR 
 111
 630
 
 741
 (148) 7/31/2013 1980
Taco Bell / KFC Minden LA 
 274
 639
 
 913
 (150) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 343
 514
 
 857
 (121) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 616
 753
 
 1,369
 (177) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 427
 522
 
 949
 (123) 7/31/2013 1997
Taco Bell / KFC Shreveport LA 
 352
 528
 
 880
 (124) 7/31/2013 1998


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Taco Bell / KFC Dunkirk NY 
 800
 978
 
 1,778
 (230) 7/31/2013 2000
Taco Bell / KFC Geneva NY 
 569
 695
 
 1,264
 (164) 7/31/2013 1999
Taco Bell / KFC Canonsburg PA 
 176
 1,586
 
 1,762
 (373) 7/31/2013 1996
Taco Bell / KFC Pittsburgh PA 
 180
 269
 3
 452
 (60) 10/1/2013 1995
Taco Bell / KFC Mount Pleasant TX 
 106
 952
 
 1,058
 (224) 7/31/2013 1992
Taco Bell / KFC New Boston TX 
 125
 1,127
 
 1,252
 (265) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bell / KFC Green Bay WI 
 470
 574
 
 1,044
 (135) 7/31/2013 1986
Taco Bell / KFC Milwaukee WI 
 533
 1,055
 
 1,588
 (266) 6/27/2013 1978
Taco Bell / KFC Benwood WV 
 123
 287
 4
 414
 (64) 10/1/2013 1995
Taco Bell / Pizza Hut Dallas TX 
 420
 1,582
 
 2,002
 (391) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Bueno Hutchinson KS 
 561
 841
 
 1,402
 (198) 7/31/2013 2000
Taco Bueno Belton MO 
 476
 701
 
 1,177
 (176) 6/27/2013 2006
Taco Bueno Springfield MO 
 753
 753
 
 1,506
 (177) 7/31/2013 2006
Taco Bueno Arlington TX 
 597
 895
 
 1,492
 (211) 7/31/2013 2000
Taco Bueno Frisco TX 
 601
 577
 
 1,178
 (145) 6/27/2013 2000
Taco Bueno Lubbock TX 
 228
 561
 
 789
 (141) 6/27/2013 2000
Taco Bueno N. Richland Hills TX 
 423
 567
 
 990
 (143) 6/27/2013 2000
Taco Bueno Waco TX 
 595
 892
 
 1,487
 (210) 7/31/2013 1995
Taco Bueno Waco TX 
 595
 893
 
 1,488
 (210) 7/31/2013 2000
Taco Cabana Austin TX 
 700
 2,105
 
 2,805
 (520) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Cabana Pasadena TX 
 420
 1,420
 
 1,840
 (351) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 600
 1,955
 
 2,555
 (483) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 500
 1,740
 
 2,240
 (430) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 280
 1,695
 
 1,975
 (419) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Cabana San Antonio TX 
 500
 1,766
 
 2,266
 (436) 6/27/2013 1995
Taco Cabana Schertz TX 
 520
 1,408
 
 1,928
 (348) 6/27/2013 1995
Take 5 Oil Change Lawrenceburg IN 
 516
 721
 
 1,237
 (13) 6/8/2017 2017
Take 5 Oil Change Alexandria KY 
 294
 677
 
 971
 (11) 6/8/2017 1996
Take 5 Oil Change Erlanger KY 
 337
 1,072
 
 1,409
 (16) 6/8/2017 2003
Take 5 Oil Change Florence KY 
 279
 896
 
 1,175
 (14) 6/8/2017 1998
Take 5 Oil Change Fort Wright KY 
 179
 816
 
 995
 (13) 6/8/2017 1995
Take 5 Oil Change Miamisburg OH 
 246
 486
 
 732
 (8) 6/8/2017 1992


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Take 5 Oil Change Moraine OH 
 415
 692
 
 1,107
 (11) 6/8/2017 1995
Talbots Hingham MA 23,362
 3,009
 27,080
 
 30,089
 (6,043) 5/24/2013 1980
Talbots Lakeville MA 22,509
 6,302
 25,209
 
 31,511
 (7,112) 5/17/2013 1987
TCF Bank Crystal MN 
 640
 642
 
 1,282
 (153) 6/27/2013 1995
TD Bank Falmouth ME 19,607
 4,057
 23,689
 (81) 27,665
 (5,393) 3/18/2013 2002
Teva Pharmaceuticals Malvern PA 
 2,666
 40,981
 (7,009) 36,638
 (2,448) 11/5/2013 1999
Texas Roadhouse Cedar Rapids IA 
 430
 2,194
 
 2,624
 (561) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Ammon ID 
 490
 1,206
 
 1,696
 (308) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Shively KY 
 540
 2,055
 
 2,595
 (525) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Concord NC 
 650
 2,130
 
 2,780
 (544) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Gastonia NC 
 570
 1,544
 
 2,114
 (395) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Hickory NC 
 580
 1,831
 
 2,411
 (468) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse College Station TX 
 670
 2,299
 
 2,969
 (588) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Grand Prairie TX 
 780
 1,867
 
 2,647
 (477) 6/27/2013 1995
Texas Roadhouse Kenosha WI 
 1,061
 1,835
 (14) 2,882
 (478) 6/27/2013 2001
TGI Fridays Royal Palm Beach FL 
 1,530
 1,530
 
 3,060
 (406) 7/31/2013 2001
TGI Fridays Ann Arbor MI 
 547
 1,640
 
 2,187
 (435) 7/31/2013 1998
TGI Fridays Kentwood MI 
 281
 2,533
 
 2,814
 (672) 7/31/2013 1983
TGI Fridays Novi MI 
 1,042
 1,042
 
 2,084
 (277) 7/31/2013 1994
TGI Fridays Blasdell NY 
 1,215
 1,913
 
 3,128
 (498) 6/27/2013 2000
TGI Fridays Warwick RI 
 1,228
 2,775
 (1,252) 2,751
 (295) 6/27/2013 1983
Thorntons Oil Bloomington IL 
 1,184
 733
 
 1,917
 (191) 2/7/2014 1992
Thorntons Oil Franklin Park IL 
 1,403
 1,882
 
 3,285
 (435) 2/7/2014 1989
Thorntons Oil Joliet IL 
 953
 2,539
 
 3,492
 (583) 2/7/2014 2000
Thorntons Oil Oaklawn IL 
 1,203
 898
 278
 2,379
 (225) 2/7/2014 1994
Thorntons Oil Ottawa IL 
 565
 2,003
 
 2,568
 (475) 2/7/2014 2006
Thorntons Oil Plainfield IL 
 862
 1,338
 
 2,200
 (326) 2/7/2014 1995
Thorntons Oil Roselle IL 
 661
 2,194
 
 2,855
 (488) 2/7/2014 1996
Thorntons Oil South Elgin IL 
 1,239
 1,688
 
 2,927
 (427) 2/7/2014 1995
Thorntons Oil Springfield IL 
 926
 2,514
 
 3,440
 (651) 2/7/2014 1994
Thorntons Oil Summit IL 
 2,233
 109
 
 2,342
 (30) 2/7/2014 2000
Thorntons Oil Waukegan IL 
 875
 1,421
 
 2,296
 (330) 2/7/2014 1999


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Thorntons Oil Westmont IL 
 760
 3,069
 
 3,829
 (677) 2/7/2014 1997
Thorntons Oil Clarksville IN 
 1,319
 687
 
 2,006
 (189) 2/7/2014 2005
Thorntons Oil Edinburgh IN 
 685
 1,505
 
 2,190
 (352) 2/7/2014 1996
Thorntons Oil Evansville IN 
 467
 1,479
 
 1,946
 (352) 2/7/2014 1987
Thorntons Oil Evansville IN 
 602
 1,398
 
 2,000
 (330) 2/7/2014 1990
Thorntons Oil Jeffersonville IN 
 1,233
 1,533
 
 2,766
 (387) 2/7/2014 1995
Thorntons Oil Terre Haute IN 
 732
 1,829
 
 2,561
 (441) 2/7/2014 1995
Thorntons Oil Henderson KY 
 659
 3,271
 
 3,930
 (755) 2/7/2014 1971
Thorntons Oil Henderson KY 
 483
 1,778
 
 2,261
 (375) 2/7/2014 2007
Thorntons Oil Louisville KY 
 637
 1,680
 
 2,317
 (351) 2/7/2014 1994
Thorntons Oil Shelbyville KY 
 299
 2,036
 
 2,335
 (453) 2/7/2014 1991
Thorntons Oil Galloway OH 
 547
 1,550
 
 2,097
 (349) 2/7/2014 1998
Tiffany & Co. Parsippany NJ 
 2,248
 81,081
 
 83,329
 (20,402) 11/5/2013 1997
Tilted Kilt Hendersonville TN 
 310
 763
 
 1,073
 (195) 6/27/2013 1995
Time Warner Cable Milwaukee WI 
 3,081
 22,512
 979
 26,572
 (5,077) 11/5/2013 2001
Tire Kingdom Auburndale FL 1,204
 609
 1,571
 
 2,180
 (334) 2/7/2014 2010
Tire Kingdom Dublin OH 
 373
 1,119
 
 1,492
 (353) 4/30/2012 2003
Tire Kingdom Greenville SC 
 499
 1,367
 
 1,866
 (301) 3/28/2014 1997
Tire Warehouse Fitchburg MA 
 203
 704
 
 907
 (180) 6/27/2013 1982
Tire Warehouse Bangor ME 
 289
 1,400
 
 1,689
 (357) 6/27/2013 1977
Tires Plus Duluth GA 
 777
 1,259
 
 2,036
 (287) 2/21/2014 2001
TitleMax Gainesville GA 
 221
 270
 
 491
 (72) 7/31/2013 2007
TJ Maxx Philadelphia PA 
 9,889
 84,953
 
 94,842
 (21,376) 11/5/2013 2001
T-Mobile Nashville TN 
 1,190
 15,847
 
 17,037
 (3,356) 11/5/2013 2002
Toys R Us Coral Springs FL 
 4,264
 5,289
 
 9,553
 (1,031) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply Oneonta AL 
 359
 1,438
 
 1,797
 (323) 4/18/2013 1983
Tractor Supply Summerdale AL 1,171
 276
 2,470
 
 2,746
 (427) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply Tuscaloosa AL 
 746
 1,979
 
 2,725
 (341) 2/7/2014 2012
Tractor Supply Little Rock AR 1,500
 930
 2,035
 
 2,965
 (350) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Auburn CA 
 1,175
 2,901
 
 4,076
 (516) 2/7/2014 2012
Tractor Supply Dixon CA 2,962
 1,619
 4,044
 
 5,663
 (725) 2/7/2014 2007
Tractor Supply Jackson CA 
 1,209
 3,640
 
 4,849
 (618) 2/7/2014 2012


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Tractor Supply Los Banos CA 3,468
 1,213
 3,638
 
 4,851
 (845) 2/28/2013 2009
Tractor Supply Buena Vista CO 
 646
 2,974
 
 3,620
 (49) 6/16/2017 2014
Tractor Supply Middletown DE 
 1,487
 3,293
 
 4,780
 (548) 2/7/2014 2007
Tractor Supply Mims FL 
 310
 2,787
 
 3,097
 (559) 10/10/2013 2012
Tractor Supply Bainbridge GA 
 687
 2,445
 
 3,132
 (404) 2/7/2014 2008
Tractor Supply Rincon GA 
 978
 2,016
 
 2,994
 (335) 2/7/2014 2007
Tractor Supply Alton IL 1,404
 565
 3,062
 59
 3,686
 (519) 2/7/2014 2008
Tractor Supply Mishawaka IN 
 620
 2,683
 
 3,303
 (457) 2/7/2014 2011
Tractor Supply Sellersburg IN 1,433
 762
 2,146
 
 2,908
 (378) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply St. John IN 2,247
 1,715
 3,397
 
 5,112
 (614) 2/7/2014 2007
Tractor Supply Lawrence KS 1,377
 361
 2,637
 
 2,998
 (458) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply Topeka KS 
 446
 1,785
 
 2,231
 (387) 5/19/2014 2006
Tractor Supply Glasgow KY 
 453
 1,812
 
 2,265
 (387) 5/19/2014 2005
Tractor Supply Grayson KY 
 540
 2,709
 
 3,249
 (468) 2/7/2014 2011
Tractor Supply Paducah KY 
 393
 1,574
 
 1,967
 (345) 5/19/2014 1995
Tractor Supply Gray LA 2,048
 550
 2,202
 
 2,752
 (553) 8/7/2012 2011
Tractor Supply Belchertown MA 1,823
 1,148
 3,179
 
 4,327
 (570) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Millbury MA 
 806
 3,094
 
 3,900
 (500) 6/26/2014 2013
Tractor Supply Southwick MA 2,428
 1,601
 3,583
 
 5,184
 (639) 2/7/2014 2008
Tractor Supply Augusta ME 1,423
 530
 2,756
 
 3,286
 (490) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Jonesville MI 
 267
 2,364
 
 2,631
 (447) 3/28/2014 2005
Tractor Supply Negaunee MI 
 488
 1,953
 
 2,441
 (501) 6/12/2012 2010
Tractor Supply Jefferson City MO 1,125
 490
 1,877
 
 2,367
 (321) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Nixa MO 1,346
 476
 2,040
 
 2,516
 (359) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Sedalia MO 1,090
 480
 1,782
 
 2,262
 (321) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply Troy MO 1,286
 730
 2,587
 
 3,317
 (438) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Union MO 1,404
 589
 3,012
 13
 3,614
 (499) 2/7/2014 2008
Tractor Supply Franklin NC 1,479
 434
 2,629
 
 3,063
 (455) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Murphy NC 1,402
 990
 2,090
 
 3,080
 (378) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply York NE 
 326
 2,452
 
 2,778
 (10) 11/3/2017 2017
Tractor Supply Plaistow NH 
 638
 2,552
 
 3,190
 (512) 10/10/2013 2012


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Tractor Supply Plymouth NH 2,074
 424
 2,430
 16
 2,870
 (586) 11/29/2012 2011
Tractor Supply Allentown NJ 
 697
 3,949
 
 4,646
 (1,069) 1/27/2012 2008
Tractor Supply Sicklerville NJ 
 1,931
 4,302
 
 6,233
 (720) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Farmington NM 
 1,091
 2,194
 
 3,285
 (415) 3/28/2014 2012
Tractor Supply Roswell NM 
 947
 2,181
 
 3,128
 (382) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Silver City NM 
 716
 2,380
 
 3,096
 (450) 3/28/2014 2012
Tractor Supply Macedon NY 
 168
 1,591
 
 1,759
 (295) 4/29/2014 1992
Tractor Supply Hamilton OH 932
 675
 1,472
 
 2,147
 (368) 2/7/2014 1975
Tractor Supply Wauseon OH 1,374
 931
 2,128
 
 3,059
 (390) 2/7/2014 2007
Tractor Supply Chickasha OK 
 599
 2,056
 538
 3,193
 (418) 3/28/2014 2014
Tractor Supply Glenpool OK 1,180
 359
 2,447
 
 2,806
 (415) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Stillwater OK 1,205
 205
 2,715
 
 2,920
 (458) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Gibsonia PA 1,648
 1,044
 2,778
 
 3,822
 (488) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Columbia SC 
 952
 2,222
 
 3,174
 (370) 2/7/2014 2011
Tractor Supply Irmo SC 
 725
 2,171
 62
 2,958
 (382) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Ballinger TX 1,248
 476
 2,477
 
 2,953
 (407) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply Del Rio TX 
 927
 2,044
 
 2,971
 (346) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Edinburg TX 
 768
 3,163
 
 3,931
 (516) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Kenedy TX 1,180
 309
 2,372
 
 2,681
 (388) 2/7/2014 2010
Tractor Supply Pearsall TX 1,161
 318
 2,551
 
 2,869
 (422) 2/7/2014 2009
Tractor Supply Rio Grande TX 
 469
 1,095
 
 1,564
 (281) 6/19/2012 1993
Tractor Supply Woodstock VA 
 524
 2,098
 
 2,622
 (436) 5/19/2014 2004
Tractor Supply Romney WV 
 418
 3,097
 
 3,515
 (11) 11/29/2017 2017
Trader Joe's Sarasota FL 
 1,646
 5,416
 
 7,062
 (1,108) 2/7/2014 2012
Trader Joe's Lexington KY 
 2,287
 3,795
 
 6,082
 (811) 2/7/2014 2012
Tumbleweed Terre Haute IN 
 434
 1,303
 
 1,737
 (346) 7/31/2013 1997
Tumbleweed Louisville KY 
 468
 1,404
 
 1,872
 (372) 7/31/2013 2001
Tumbleweed Mayesville KY 
 353
 823
 
 1,176
 (218) 7/31/2013 2000
Tumbleweed Owensboro KY 
 355
 1,420
 
 1,775
 (377) 7/31/2013 1997
Tumbleweed Bellefontaine OH 
 234
 938
 
 1,172
 (249) 7/31/2013 1999
Tumbleweed Springfield OH 
 549
 1,280
 
 1,829
 (340) 7/31/2013 1998
Tumbleweed Wooster OH 
 342
 799
 
 1,141
 (212) 7/31/2013 1997


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Tumbleweed Zanesville OH 
 639
 1,491
 
 2,130
 (395) 7/31/2013 1998
Tutor Time Downingtown PA 
 205
 2,788
 
 2,993
 (562) 2/7/2014 1998
Tutor Time Austin TX 
 417
 1,861
 
 2,278
 (396) 2/7/2014 2000
Ulta Salon Jonesboro AR 
 742
 2,289
 
 3,031
 (422) 2/7/2014 2013
Ulta Salon Fort Gratiot MI 
 164
 2,083
 
 2,247
 (396) 2/7/2014 2012
Ulta Salon Jackson TN 1,454
 547
 2,123
 
 2,670
 (400) 2/7/2014 2010
United Buffet and Grille Hagerstown MD 
 244
 1,306
 (1,505) 45
 (12) 1/8/2014 2001
United Technologies Bradenton FL 10,050
 2,692
 17,973
 
 20,665
 (2,969) 2/7/2014 2004
University Plaza Flagstaff AZ 
 4,727
 18,087
 491
 23,305
 (4,505) 2/7/2014 1982
The UPS Store Elizabethtown KY 
 1,460
 10,336
 778
 12,574
 (2,686) 9/24/2013 2001
US Bank Alsip IL 
 226
 1,280
 
 1,506
 (445) 8/1/2010 1981
US Bank Chicago IL 
 267
 1,511
 
 1,778
 (526) 8/1/2010 1923
US Bank Chicago IL 
 191
 1,082
 
 1,273
 (376) 8/1/2010 1979
US Bank Chicago Heights IL 
 182
 1,637
 
 1,819
 (435) 1/24/2013 1996
US Bank Elmwood Park IL 
 431
 2,441
 
 2,872
 (815) 8/1/2010 1984
US Bank Evergreen Park IL 
 167
 944
 
 1,111
 (329) 8/1/2010 1984
US Bank Lyons IL 
 214
 1,212
 
 1,426
 (422) 8/1/2010 1959
US Bank Orland Hills IL 2,646
 1,253
 2,327
 
 3,580
 (626) 12/14/2012 1995
US Bank Westchester IL 
 366
 853
 
 1,219
 (223) 2/22/2013 1986
US Bank Wilmington IL 
 330
 1,872
 
 2,202
 (615) 8/1/2010 1966
US Bank Fayetteville NC 
 608
 1,741
 
 2,349
 (322) 2/7/2014 2012
US Bank Garfield Height OH 
 165
 1,016
 
 1,181
 (243) 1/8/2014 1958
VA Clinic Oceanside CA 27,749
 9,489
 33,812
 105
 43,406
 (6,015) 2/7/2014 2010
Vacant Andalusia AL 
 94
 251
 
 345
 (65) 6/27/2013 2004
Vacant Jasper AL 
 577
 2,545
 (2,786) 336
 (34) 2/7/2014 2000
Vacant Mobile AL 
 127
 276
 (162) 241
 (18) 6/27/2013 1974
Vacant Tuscaloosa AL 
 244
 1,306
 (1,549) 1
 
 1/8/2014 2001
Vacant Arkadelphia AR 
 225
 633
 (595) 263
 
 6/27/2013 1990
Vacant Pine Bluff AR 
 105
 433
 (409) 129
 (16) 6/27/2013 1978
Vacant Searcy AR 
 231
 1,286
 (1,318) 199
 (30) 1/8/2014 1998
Vacant Fountain Hills AZ 
 241
 597
 (228) 610
 (13) 6/27/2013 1994
Vacant Peoria AZ 
 837
 1,953
 (1,552) 1,238
 (28) 2/27/2013 1996


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Vacant Fresno CA 
 190
 1,810
 (1,249) 751
 (167) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Gilroy CA 
 249
 986
 (1,235) 
 
 1/8/2014 2002
Vacant San Luis Obispo CA 
 195
 1,013
 (844) 364
 (61) 1/8/2014 2000
Vacant Santee CA 
 265
 1,261
 (1,390) 136
 (27) 1/8/2014 1995
Vacant Vacaville CA 
 195
 1,044
 (1,238) 1
 
 1/8/2014 2000
Vacant Highlands Ranch CO 3,475
 2,850
 4,795
 
 7,645
 (947) 2/7/2014 2007
Vacant Lone Tree CO 
 196
 1,014
 (1,070) 140
 (23) 1/8/2014 1995
Vacant New London CT 
 94
 534
 (448) 180
 (2) 8/1/2010 1995
Vacant Smyrna DE 
 183
 1,036
 (994) 225
 (5) 8/1/2010 1995
Vacant Cocoa FL 
 249
 567
 
 816
 (143) 6/27/2013 1979
Vacant Davie FL 
 193
 1,009
 (1,201) 1
 
 1/8/2014 1989
Vacant Lake Wales FL 
 671
 671
 
 1,342
 (172) 3/22/2013 1988
Vacant Melbourne FL 
 464
 1,392
 
 1,856
 (351) 4/12/2013 1987
Vacant Pinellas Park FL 16,200
 4,538
 23,842
 (17,726) 10,654
 (810) 11/5/2013 2001
Vacant Tallahassee FL 
 828
 1,933
 
 2,761
 (488) 4/12/2013 1991
Vacant Titusville FL 
 528
 239
 
 767
 (60) 6/27/2013 1978
Vacant Bowdon GA 
 416
 1,247
 (1,457) 206
 (2) 3/22/2013 1900
Vacant Columbus GA 
 1,307
 2,529
 (2,876) 960
 (66) 2/7/2014 2002
Vacant Dawson GA 
 131
 274
 (182) 223
 (16) 6/27/2013 1987
Vacant Stockbridge GA 
 422
 2,391
 (2,428) 385
 (15) 7/31/2013 1987
Vacant Mason City IA 
 290
 1,255
 (192) 1,353
 (175) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Joliet IL 
 1,834
 1,585
 
 3,419
 (415) 2/7/2014 2011
Vacant Lombard IL 
 84
 100
 
 184
 (26) 6/27/2013 1973
Vacant Merrillville IN 
 511
 4,768
 
 5,279
 (1,042) 2/7/2014 2011
Vacant London KY 
 370
 1,493
 (666) 1,197
 (47) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Nicholasville KY 
 435
 2,040
 (939) 1,536
 (146) 6/11/2014 2001
Vacant Bossier City LA 
 1,168
 2,594
 (2,882) 880
 (75) 2/7/2014 2004
Vacant Detroit MI 
 204
 1,159
 (1,248) 115
 (2) 8/1/2010 1956
Vacant Grosse Pointe Woods MI 
 140
 1,046
 (785) 401
 (54) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Harper Woods MI 
 207
 1,171
 (953) 425
 (5) 8/1/2010 1982
Vacant Highland Park MI 
 150
 848
 (637) 361
 (4) 8/1/2010 1967
Vacant Ypsilanti MI 
 85
 483
 (208) 360
 
 11/23/2011 2002


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Vacant Blue Springs MO 
 810
 1,346
 (1,515) 641
 (62) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Chesterfield MO 
 1,537
 4,123
 
 5,660
 (904) 2/7/2014 2012
Vacant Joplin MO 
 314
 1,610
 
 1,924
 (359) 2/11/2014 1984
Vacant Joplin MO 
 127
 300
 
 427
 (89) 2/11/2014 1973
Vacant Pearl MS 
 1,058
 1,857
 (1,893) 1,022
 (83) 2/7/2014 2000
Vacant Albemarle NC 
 483
 457
 (493) 447
 (33) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Burlington NC 
 446
 545
 (403) 588
 (19) 4/12/2013 1995
Vacant Monroe NC 
 204
 1,837
 (1,319) 722
 (61) 4/12/2013 1920
Vacant Oakboro NC 
 360
 540
 (605) 295
 (2) 7/23/2013 1970
Vacant Yadkinville NC 
 200
 371
 (368) 203
 (10) 4/12/2013 1975
Vacant Zebulon NC 
 515
 630
 (680) 465
 (3) 3/22/2013 1972
Vacant Flanders NJ 915
 1,468
 883
 
 2,351
 (175) 2/7/2014 2003
Vacant Mt. Laurel NJ 1,447
 1,332
 1,792
 
 3,124
 (286) 2/7/2014 2004
Vacant Hobbs NM 
 815
 
 (543) 272
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant East Greenbush NY 
 404
 269
 (241) 432
 (5) 6/27/2013 1980
Vacant Elmira NY 
 199
 370
 (441) 128
 (4) 7/31/2013 1975
Vacant Greene NY 
 216
 1,227
 (1,068) 375
 (7) 8/1/2010 1981
Vacant Schenectady NY 
 292
 1,655
 (847) 1,100
 (19) 8/1/2010 1974
Vacant Cincinnati OH 
 353
 824
 (572) 605
 (5) 7/31/2013 1969
Vacant Englewood OH 
 547
 
 (384) 163
 
 6/27/2013 1974
Vacant Massillon OH 
 212
 1,202
 (1,008) 406
 (5) 8/1/2010 1958
Vacant Mentor OH 
 178
 1,011
 
 1,189
 (352) 8/1/2010 1976
Vacant Moraine OH 
 87
 148
 
 235
 (28) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Youngstown OH 
 139
 232
 (37) 334
 (32) 6/27/2013 1976
Vacant Tulsa OK 
 530
 1,174
 225
 1,929
 (300) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant The Dalles OR 
 201
 802
 (486) 517
 (172) 7/31/2013 1994
Vacant Grants Pass OR 
 393
 2,979
 
 3,372
 (674) 1/8/2014 1963
Vacant Beaver Falls PA 
 243
 1,304
 (1,489) 58
 (9) 1/8/2014 2004
Vacant Indiana PA 
 676
 1,255
 (920) 1,011
 (105) 7/31/2013 2000
Vacant North Fayette PA 
 1,990
 2,700
 
 4,690
 (521) 2/7/2014 1999
Vacant Lexington SC 
 244
 1,307
 (1,356) 195
 (37) 1/8/2014 1998
Vacant North Charleston SC 
 2,193
 4,636
 
 6,829
 (1,025) 2/7/2014 2008


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Vacant Travelers Rest SC 
 746
 746
 (990) 502
 (11) 4/12/2013 1995
Vacant La Vergne TN 
 171
 209
 
 380
 (54) 3/22/2013 1985
Vacant Memphis TN 
 100
 283
 167
 550
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Sevierville TN 
 1,443
 430
 (751) 1,122
 (66) 2/7/2014 2003
Vacant Abilene TX 
 803
 
 
 803
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Amarillo TX 
 993
 2,317
 (1,848) 1,462
 (84) 7/31/2013 2001
Vacant Austin TX 
 837
 1,797
 
 2,634
 (468) 6/27/2013 1998
Vacant Bay City TX 
 229
 124
 (220) 133
 (5) 7/31/2013 1985
Vacant Dallas TX 
 810
 1,656
 
 2,466
 (423) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Grand Prairie TX 
 997
 2,327
 
 3,324
 (617) 7/31/2013 2001
Vacant Houston TX 
 900
 1,749
 
 2,649
 (447) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Houston TX 
 980
 2,284
 (1,575) 1,689
 (76) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Irving TX 
 522
 512
 (235) 799
 (52) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Lubbock TX 
 694
 
 (301) 393
 
 6/27/2013 1979
Vacant Plano TX 
 540
 1,060
 
 1,600
 (271) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant San Angelo TX 
 769
 2,306
 
 3,075
 (612) 7/31/2013 2005
Vacant Texas City TX 
 614
 3,351
 (2,351) 1,614
 (149) 2/7/2014 2002
Vacant Midlothian VA 
 230
 1,300
 (861) 669
 (27) 6/27/2013 1995
Vacant Norfolk VA 
 656
 437
 
 1,093
 (110) 4/12/2013 1990
Vacant Poultney VT 
 149
 847
 (777) 219
 (1) 8/1/2010 1860
Vacant White River Junction VT 
 183
 1,039
 (836) 386
 (2) 8/1/2010 1975
Vacant Schofield WI 
 106
 196
 
 302
 (46) 7/31/2013 1987
Vanguard Car Rental College Park GA 
 1,561
 6,244
 
 7,805
 (1,649) 5/19/2014 2002
Velox Insurance Woodstock GA 
 155
 127
 
 282
 (34) 7/31/2013 1988
Verizon Wireless Statesville NC 
 207
 459
 27
 693
 (118) 6/27/2013 1993
The Vitamin Shoppe Evergreen Park IL 
 476
 1,427
 
 1,903
 (377) 4/19/2013 2012
The Vitamin Shoppe Ashland VA 
 2,399
 19,663
 
 22,062
 (4,948) 11/5/2013 2013
Volusia Square Daytona Beach FL 16,557
 4,598
 28,511
 269
 33,378
 (5,881) 2/7/2014 1986
Waffle House Cocoa FL 
 150
 279
 
 429
 (66) 7/31/2013 1986
Walgreens Birmingham AL 1,509
 996
 3,005
 
 4,001
 (700) 2/7/2014 1999
Walgreens Wetumpka AL 
 547
 3,102
 
 3,649
 (1,012) 2/22/2012 2007
Walgreens Kingman AZ 2,902
 669
 5,726
 
 6,395
 (1,230) 2/7/2014 2009


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Phoenix AZ 
 1,037
 1,927
 
 2,964
 (554) 3/26/2013 1999
Walgreens Tucson AZ 
 1,234
 5,143
 
 6,377
 (1,102) 2/7/2014 2003
Walgreens Tucson AZ 2,910
 1,406
 3,571
 
 4,977
 (782) 2/7/2014 2004
Walgreens Coalinga CA 2,800
 396
 3,568
 
 3,964
 (1,200) 10/11/2011 2008
Walgreens Lancaster CA 2,719
 859
 4,246
 
 5,105
 (996) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Castle Rock CO 3,953
 1,581
 3,689
 
 5,270
 (987) 7/11/2013 2002
Walgreens Denver CO 3,350
 
 4,050
 
 4,050
 (1,083) 7/2/2013 2008
Walgreens Pueblo CO 
 519
 2,971
 
 3,490
 (645) 2/7/2014 2003
Walgreens Orlando FL 
 1,007
 1,869
 
 2,876
 (481) 9/30/2013 1996
Walgreens Acworth GA 
 1,583
 2,940
 
 4,523
 (875) 1/25/2013 2012
Walgreens Decatur GA 
 1,746
 3,337
 
 5,083
 (724) 2/7/2014 2001
Walgreens Grayson GA 2,720
 947
 3,747
 
 4,694
 (800) 2/7/2014 2004
Walgreens Union City GA 
 909
 3,841
 
 4,750
 (818) 2/7/2014 2005
Walgreens Dubuque IA 
 638
 3,905
 
 4,543
 (830) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Twin Falls ID 2,355
 1,156
 3,896
 
 5,052
 (871) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Cahokia IL 
 394
 1,577
 167
 2,138
 (417) 5/19/2014 1994
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 1,212
 2,829
 
 4,041
 (842) 1/30/2013 1999
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 1,617
 3,003
 
 4,620
 (893) 1/30/2013 1995
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 952
 3,235
 
 4,187
 (687) 2/7/2014 2003
Walgreens Chicago IL 
 911
 4,830
 
 5,741
 (1,000) 2/7/2014 2000
Walgreens Machesney Park IL 
 822
 3,727
 
 4,549
 (809) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Matteson IL 2,450
 416
 4,070
 
 4,486
 (829) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens South Elgin IL 2,189
 1,710
 3,208
 
 4,918
 (709) 2/7/2014 2002
Walgreens St. Charles IL 1,964
 1,472
 3,262
 
 4,734
 (691) 2/7/2014 2002
Walgreens Anderson IN 
 807
 3,227
 
 4,034
 (1,012) 7/31/2012 2001
Walgreens Lafayette IN 2,350
 626
 4,183
 
 4,809
 (801) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens South Bend IN 3,022
 1,240
 5,014
 
 6,254
 (1,112) 2/7/2014 2006
Walgreens Frankfort KY 
 911
 3,643
 
 4,554
 (1,189) 2/8/2012 2006
Walgreens Shereveport LA 
 619
 3,509
 
 4,128
 (1,145) 2/22/2012 2003
Walgreens Framingham MA 2,951
 2,103
 4,770
 
 6,873
 (1,005) 2/7/2014 2007
Walgreens Baltimore MD 
 1,185
 2,764
 
 3,949
 (726) 8/6/2013 2000
Walgreens Brooklyn Park MD 
 1,416
 4,160
 
 5,576
 (874) 2/7/2014 2008


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Augusta ME 3,058
 1,648
 5,146
 
 6,794
 (1,157) 2/7/2014 2007
Walgreens Clarkston MI 
 2,768
 3,197
 
 5,965
 (699) 2/7/2014 2000
Walgreens Clinton MI 
 1,463
 3,413
 
 4,876
 (1,037) 11/13/2012 2002
Walgreens Dearborn Heights MI 
 190
 3,605
 
 3,795
 (1,018) 4/1/2013 1998
Walgreens Eastpointe MI 
 668
 2,672
 
 3,340
 (878) 1/19/2012 1998
Walgreens Lincoln Park MI 5,494
 1,041
 5,896
 
 6,937
 (1,850) 7/31/2012 2007
Walgreens Livonia MI 
 261
 2,350
 
 2,611
 (664) 4/1/2013 1998
Walgreens Stevensville MI 3,099
 855
 3,420
 
 4,275
 (1,141) 11/28/2011 2007
Walgreens Troy MI 
 
 1,896
 
 1,896
 (571) 12/12/2012 2000
Walgreens Warren MI 
 748
 2,990
 
 3,738
 (908) 11/21/2012 1999
Walgreens North Mankato MN 2,451
 1,748
 3,604
 
 5,352
 (795) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Country Club Hills MO 
 997
 4,204
 
 5,201
 (841) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Columbia MS 
 452
 4,072
 
 4,524
 (1,227) 12/21/2012 2011
Walgreens Greenwood MS 
 561
 3,181
 
 3,742
 (1,038) 2/22/2012 2007
Walgreens Cape Carteret NC 2,400
 919
 3,087
 
 4,006
 (667) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Durham NC 2,871
 1,441
 3,581
 
 5,022
 (863) 2/7/2014 2010
Walgreens Durham NC 2,760
 2,201
 2,923
 
 5,124
 (765) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Laurinburg NC 
 355
 3,577
 
 3,932
 (819) 2/26/2014 2013
Walgreens Leland NC 2,472
 1,226
 3,681
 
 4,907
 (818) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Rocky Mount NC 2,899
 1,105
 4,046
 
 5,151
 (994) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Winterville NC 2,931
 578
 5,322
 
 5,900
 (1,214) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens North Platte NE 
 935
 4,291
 
 5,226
 (958) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Omaha NE 2,496
 1,316
 4,122
 
 5,438
 (910) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Papillion NE 
 1,239
 3,212
 
 4,451
 (696) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Maplewood NJ 4,700
 1,071
 6,071
 
 7,142
 (2,026) 11/18/2011 2011


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Albuquerque NM 
 1,173
 2,287
 
 3,460
 (506) 2/7/2014 1996
Walgreens Las Vegas NV 6,566
 1,528
 6,114
 
 7,642
 (1,949) 5/30/2012 2009
Walgreens Las Vegas NV 
 700
 2,801
 
 3,501
 (791) 4/30/2013 2001
Walgreens Lockport NY 
 2,358
 2,301
 
 4,659
 (514) 4/21/2014 1998
Walgreens Staten Island NY 3,081
 
 3,984
 
 3,984
 (1,340) 10/5/2011 2007
Walgreens Watertown NY 
 2,937
 2,664
 
 5,601
 (593) 2/7/2014 2006
Walgreens Akron OH 1,684
 664
 1,548
 71
 2,283
 (430) 5/31/2013 1994
Walgreens Bryan OH 
 219
 4,154
 
 4,373
 (1,355) 2/22/2012 2007
Walgreens Cleveland OH 
 472
 1,890
 68
 2,430
 (417) 5/19/2014 1994
Walgreens Cleveland OH 2,608
 743
 4,757
 
 5,500
 (1,057) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Eaton OH 3,067
 398
 3,586
 
 3,984
 (1,134) 6/27/2012 2008
Walgreens Medina OH 
 820
 4,585
 
 5,405
 (961) 2/7/2014 2001
Walgreens New Albany OH 
 919
 3,424
 
 4,343
 (716) 2/7/2014 2006
Walgreens Edmond OK 2,240
 697
 4,287
 
 4,984
 (929) 2/7/2014 2000
Walgreens Stillwater OK 
 368
 4,368
 87
 4,823
 (941) 2/7/2014 2000
Walgreens Tahlequah OK 
 647
 3,664
 
 4,311
 (1,090) 1/2/2013 2008
Walgreens Tulsa OK 
 1,147
 2,904
 
 4,051
 (629) 2/7/2014 2001
Walgreens Aibonito Pueblo PR 5,695
 1,855
 5,566
 
 7,421
 (1,600) 3/5/2013 2012
Walgreens Las Piedras PR 5,293
 1,726
 5,179
 
 6,905
 (1,463) 4/3/2013 1995
Walgreens Anderson SC 
 835
 3,342
 
 4,177
 (1,090) 2/8/2012 2006
Walgreens Easley SC 3,686
 1,206
 3,617
 
 4,823
 (1,144) 6/27/2012 2007
Walgreens Fort Mill SC 2,180
 1,300
 2,760
 (232) 3,828
 (671) 2/7/2014 2010
Walgreens Greenville SC 3,991
 1,313
 3,940
 
 5,253
 (1,246) 6/27/2012 2006
Walgreens Lancaster SC 2,882
 1,941
 3,526
 
 5,467
 (867) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Myrtle Beach SC 
 
 2,077
 
 2,077
 (688) 12/29/2011 2001
Walgreens N. Charleston SC 3,379
 1,320
 3,081
 
 4,401
 (974) 6/27/2012 2007
Walgreens Spearfish SD 
 1,116
 4,158
 
 5,274
 (909) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Bartlett TN 
 2,358
 2,194
 
 4,552
 (472) 2/7/2014 2001
Walgreens Cordova TN 
 1,005
 2,345
 
 3,350
 (712) 11/9/2012 2002
Walgreens Memphis TN 
 896
 2,687
 
 3,583
 (823) 10/2/2012 2003
Walgreens Anthony TX 
 644
 4,369
 
 5,013
 (893) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Baytown TX 2,399
 953
 4,298
 
 5,251
 (915) 2/7/2014 2009


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Walgreens Denton TX 
 1,184
 3,726
 
 4,910
 (793) 2/7/2014 2009
Walgreens Houston TX 
 491
 1,965
 
 2,456
 (495) 5/19/2014 1993
Walgreens Fredericksburg VA 
 2,320
 3,789
 
 6,109
 (938) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Portsmouth VA 1,215
 730
 3,311
 
 4,041
 (820) 11/5/2013 1998
Walgreens Appleton WI 1,819
 975
 3,047
 
 4,022
 (666) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Appleton WI 2,651
 1,198
 4,344
 
 5,542
 (955) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Beloit WI 2,184
 721
 3,653
 
 4,374
 (808) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Janesville WI 
 1,039
 5,315
 
 6,354
 (1,155) 2/7/2014 2008
Walgreens Janesville WI 2,164
 593
 4,009
 
 4,602
 (867) 2/7/2014 2010
Walgreens Bridgeport WV 
 1,315
 3,176
 
 4,491
 (732) 2/18/2014 2011
Wal-Mart Pueblo CO 8,249
 2,586
 12,512
 
 15,098
 (2,775) 2/7/2014 1998
Wal-Mart Douglasville GA 
 3,559
 17,588
 
 21,147
 (3,623) 2/7/2014 1999
Wal-Mart Valdosta GA 
 3,909
 9,447
 
 13,356
 (2,007) 2/7/2014 1998
Wal-Mart Cary NC 
 2,314
 5,549
 
 7,863
 (1,162) 2/7/2014 2005
Wal-Mart Albuquerque NM 
 10,991
 
 
 10,991
 
 2/7/2014 2008
Wal-Mart Las Vegas NV 
 17,038
 
 
 17,038
 
 2/7/2014 2001
Wal-Mart Lancaster SC 
 2,714
 11,677
 
 14,391
 (2,481) 2/7/2014 1999
Wal-Mart Oneida TN 
 1,803
 8,580
 
 10,383
 (1,778) 2/7/2014 1999
Waste Connections Weatherford TX 
 102
 3,386
 (2,911) 577
 (104) 6/12/2014 2011
WaWa Gap PA 
 561
 5,054
 
 5,615
 (1,044) 2/7/2014 2004
WaWa Portsmouth VA 1,241
 1,573
 
 
 1,573
 
 2/7/2014 2008
Weir Oil and Gas Williston ND 
 273
 6,232
 
 6,505
 (968) 6/25/2014 2012
Wells Fargo Bristol PA 
 114
 81
 
 195
 (24) 1/8/2014 1818
Wells Fargo Lebanon PA 
 80
 435
 89
 604
 (100) 1/8/2014 1995
Welspun Global Trade Houston TX 19,524
 2,356
 36,347
 18
 38,721
 (7,309) 11/5/2013 2009
Wendy's Anniston AL 
 454
 591
 
 1,045
 (149) 6/27/2013 1976
Wendy's Auburn AL 
 718
 1,333
 
 2,051
 (314) 7/31/2013 2000
Wendy's Birmingham AL 
 562
 990
 
 1,552
 (249) 6/27/2013 2005
Wendy's Homewood AL 
 995
 
 
 995
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Phenix City AL 
 529
 1,178
 
 1,707
 (297) 6/27/2013 1999
Wendy's Batesville AR 
 155
 878
 
 1,033
 (206) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Benton AR 
 478
 1,018
 
 1,496
 (256) 6/27/2013 1993


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Bentonville AR 
 648
 708
 
 1,356
 (178) 6/27/2013 1993
Wendy's Bryant AR 
 529
 575
 
 1,104
 (145) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Cabot AR 
 524
 707
 
 1,231
 (178) 6/27/2013 1991
Wendy's Conway AR 
 478
 594
 
 1,072
 (150) 6/27/2013 1985
Wendy's Conway AR 
 482
 833
 
 1,315
 (210) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Fayetteville AR 
 408
 830
 
 1,238
 (209) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Fayetteville AR 
 463
 463
 
 926
 (109) 7/31/2013 1989
Wendy's Fort Smith AR 
 195
 1,186
 (11) 1,370
 (299) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Fort Smith AR 
 63
 1,016
 
 1,079
 (256) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 278
 878
 
 1,156
 (221) 6/27/2013 1976
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 990
 623
 
 1,613
 (386) 6/27/2013 1982
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 605
 463
 
 1,068
 (117) 6/27/2013 1987
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 501
 500
 
 1,001
 (118) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 773
 773
 
 1,546
 (182) 7/31/2013 1994
Wendy's Little Rock AR 
 532
 650
 
 1,182
 (153) 7/31/2013 1978
Wendy's Pine Bluff AR 
 221
 1,022
 
 1,243
 (257) 6/27/2013 1989
Wendy's Rogers AR 
 579
 912
 
 1,491
 (230) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Russellville AR 
 356
 638
 
 994
 (160) 6/27/2013 1985
Wendy's Springdale AR 
 323
 896
 
 1,219
 (225) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Springdale AR 
 410
 821
 
 1,231
 (207) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Stuttgart AR 
 67
 1,038
 
 1,105
 (261) 6/27/2013 2001
Wendy's Van Buren AR 
 197
 748
 
 945
 (188) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Payson AZ 
 679
 829
 (769) 739
 (5) 7/31/2013 1986
Wendy's Camarillo CA 
 320
 2,253
 
 2,573
 (557) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Groton CT 
 1,099
 900
 
 1,999
 (212) 7/31/2013 1978
Wendy's Norwich CT 
 703
 937
 
 1,640
 (236) 6/27/2013 1980
Wendy's Orange CT 
 1,343
 1,641
 
 2,984
 (386) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Indialantic FL 
 592
 614
 
 1,206
 (155) 6/27/2013 1985
Wendy's Lake Wales FL 
 975
 1,462
 
 2,437
 (344) 7/31/2013 1999
Wendy's Lynn Haven FL 
 446
 852
 
 1,298
 (214) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Melbourne FL 
 550
 680
 
 1,230
 (171) 6/27/2013 1993
Wendy's Merritt Island FL 
 720
 589
 
 1,309
 (139) 7/31/2013 1990


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's New Smyrna Beach FL 
 476
 394
 
 870
 (99) 6/27/2013 1982
Wendy's Ormond Beach FL 
 626
 561
 
 1,187
 (141) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Ormond Beach FL 
 503
 503
 
 1,006
 (118) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Panama City FL 
 461
 529
 
 990
 (133) 6/27/2013 1984
Wendy's Panama City FL 
 445
 837
 
 1,282
 (211) 6/27/2013 1987
Wendy's Port Orange FL 
 695
 569
 
 1,264
 (134) 7/31/2013 1996
Wendy's South Daytona FL 
 531
 432
 
 963
 (109) 6/27/2013 1980
Wendy's Tallahassee FL 
 952
 514
 
 1,466
 (129) 6/27/2013 1986
Wendy's Tallahassee FL 
 855
 505
 
 1,360
 (127) 6/27/2013 1986
Wendy's Titusville FL 
 415
 761
 
 1,176
 (192) 6/27/2013 1984
Wendy's Titusville FL 
 414
 770
 
 1,184
 (181) 7/31/2013 1996
Wendy's Albany GA 
 414
 1,656
 
 2,070
 (389) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Albany GA 
 383
 748
 
 1,131
 (157) 3/26/2014 1999
Wendy's Austell GA 
 383
 506
 
 889
 (127) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Brunswick GA 
 306
 435
 
 741
 (110) 6/27/2013 1985
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 701
 1,787
 
 2,488
 (450) 6/27/2013 1999
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 743
 1,184
 
 1,927
 (298) 6/27/2013 1988
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 478
 2,209
 
 2,687
 (556) 6/27/2013 2003
Wendy's Columbus GA 
 223
 1,380
 
 1,603
 (290) 3/26/2014 1982
Wendy's Douglasville GA 
 605
 776
 
 1,381
 (195) 6/27/2013 1993
Wendy's Eastman GA 
 258
 473
 
 731
 (119) 6/27/2013 1996
Wendy's Fairburn GA 
 1,076
 1,316
 
 2,392
 (309) 7/31/2013 2002
Wendy's Hogansville GA 
 240
 1,359
 
 1,599
 (320) 7/31/2013 1985
Wendy's Lithia Springs GA 
 668
 774
 
 1,442
 (195) 6/27/2013 1988
Wendy's Morrow GA 
 755
 922
 
 1,677
 (217) 7/31/2013 1990
Wendy's Savannah GA 
 720
 720
 
 1,440
 (169) 7/31/2013 2001
Wendy's Sharpsburg GA 
 649
 1,299
 
 1,948
 (327) 6/27/2013 2002
Wendy's Stockbridge GA 
 480
 558
 
 1,038
 (141) 6/27/2013 1987
Wendy's Bourbonnais IL 
 346
 1,039
 
 1,385
 (244) 7/31/2013 1993
Wendy's Joliet IL 
 642
 963
 
 1,605
 (227) 7/31/2013 1977
Wendy's Kankakee IL 
 250
 1,419
 
 1,669
 (334) 7/31/2013 2005
Wendy's Mokena IL 
 665
 997
 
 1,662
 (235) 7/31/2013 1992


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Normal IL 
 443
 991
 
 1,434
 (208) 3/26/2014 1985
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 872
 736
 
 1,608
 (185) 6/27/2013 1978
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 859
 707
 
 1,566
 (178) 6/27/2013 1978
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 505
 757
 
 1,262
 (178) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Anderson IN 
 584
 713
 
 1,297
 (168) 7/31/2013 1976
Wendy's Avon IN 
 538
 407
 
 945
 (127) 2/7/2014 1990
Wendy's Avon IN 
 638
 330
 
 968
 (139) 2/7/2014 1999
Wendy's Carmel IN 
 736
 211
 
 947
 (72) 2/7/2014 1980
Wendy's Carmel IN 
 915
 178
 
 1,093
 (89) 2/7/2014 2001
Wendy's Connersville IN 
 324
 1,298
 
 1,622
 (305) 7/31/2013 1989
Wendy's Fishers IN 
 855
 147
 
 1,002
 (75) 2/7/2014 1999
Wendy's Fishers IN 
 761
 229
 
 990
 (94) 2/7/2014 2012
Wendy's Greenfield IN 
 429
 214
 
 643
 (74) 2/7/2014 1980
Wendy's Indianapolis IN 
 751
 212
 
 963
 (90) 2/7/2014 1993
Wendy's Lebanon IN 
 1,265
 108
 
 1,373
 (67) 2/7/2014 1979
Wendy's Noblesville IN 
 590
 42
 
 632
 (19) 2/7/2014 1988
Wendy's Pendleton IN 
 448
 894
 
 1,342
 (225) 6/27/2013 2005
Wendy's Richmond IN 
 735
 1,716
 
 2,451
 (404) 7/31/2013 1989
Wendy's Richmond IN 
 661
 992
 
 1,653
 (233) 7/31/2013 1989
Wendy's Benton KY 
 252
 926
 
 1,178
 (194) 3/26/2014 2001
Wendy's Louisville KY 
 834
 1,379
 
 2,213
 (347) 6/27/2013 2001
Wendy's Louisville KY 
 532
 1,221
 
 1,753
 (307) 6/27/2013 1998
Wendy's Louisville KY 
 857
 1,420
 
 2,277
 (358) 6/27/2013 2000
Wendy's Mayfield KY 
 242
 779
 
 1,021
 (164) 3/26/2014 1986
Wendy's Baton Rouge LA 
 316
 782
 (522) 576
 
 6/27/2013 1998
Wendy's Minden LA 
 182
 936
 
 1,118
 (236) 6/27/2013 2001
Wendy's Worcester MA 
 370
 1,288
 
 1,658
 (318) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Baltimore MD 
 760
 802
 
 1,562
 (202) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Baltimore MD 
 904
 1,035
 
 1,939
 (261) 6/27/2013 2002
Wendy's District Heights MD 
 332
 275
 
 607
 (69) 6/27/2013 1979
Wendy's Landover MD 
 340
 267
 
 607
 (67) 6/27/2013 1978
Wendy's Pasadena MD 
 1,049
 1,902
 
 2,951
 (479) 6/27/2013 1997


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Salisbury MD 
 370
 1,299
 
 1,669
 (321) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Madison Heights MI 
 198
 725
 (477) 446
 (16) 6/27/2013 1998
Wendy's Picayune MS 
 437
 1,032
 
 1,469
 (217) 3/26/2014 1983
Wendy's Kinston NC 
 491
 1,159
 
 1,650
 (236) 5/1/2014 2004
Wendy's Bellevue NE 
 338
 484
 
 822
 (122) 6/27/2013 1981
Wendy's Millville NJ 
 373
 1,169
 
 1,542
 (294) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Henderson NV 
 933
 842
 
 1,775
 (212) 2/7/2014 1997
Wendy's Henderson NV 
 882
 457
 
 1,339
 (114) 2/7/2014 1999
Wendy's Henderson NV 
 785
 507
 
 1,292
 (138) 2/7/2014 2000
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 398
 589
 
 987
 (129) 2/7/2014 1976
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 919
 562
 
 1,481
 (147) 2/7/2014 1976
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 789
 583
 
 1,372
 (130) 2/7/2014 1984
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 725
 458
 
 1,183
 (118) 2/7/2014 1986
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 915
 724
 
 1,639
 (177) 2/7/2014 1991
Wendy's Las Vegas NV 
 633
 392
 
 1,025
 (90) 2/7/2014 1994
Wendy's Auburn NY 
 465
 1,085
 
 1,550
 (255) 7/31/2013 1977
Wendy's Binghamton NY 
 293
 879
 
 1,172
 (207) 7/31/2013 1978
Wendy's Corning NY 
 191
 1,717
 
 1,908
 (404) 7/31/2013 1996
Wendy's Cortland NY 
 635
 952
 
 1,587
 (224) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Endicott NY 
 313
 1,253
 
 1,566
 (295) 7/31/2013 1987
Wendy's Fulton NY 
 392
 1,181
 
 1,573
 (248) 3/26/2014 1980
Wendy's Horseheads NY 
 72
 1,369
 
 1,441
 (322) 7/31/2013 1982
Wendy's Liverpool NY 
 530
 864
 
 1,394
 (82) 3/26/2014 1980
Wendy's Oswego NY 
 190
 645
 
 835
 (135) 3/26/2014 1986
Wendy's Owego NY 
 101
 1,915
 
 2,016
 (450) 7/31/2013 1989
Wendy's Vestal NY 
 488
 878
 
 1,366
 (83) 3/26/2014 1995
Wendy's Belpre OH 
 297
 1,194
 
 1,491
 (251) 3/26/2014 2000
Wendy's Bowling Green OH 
 502
 932
 (926) 508
 (38) 7/31/2013 1994
Wendy's Brookville OH 
 448
 1,072
 
 1,520
 (225) 3/26/2014 1984
Wendy's Buckeye Lake OH 
 864
 877
 
 1,741
 (221) 6/27/2013 2000
Wendy's Centerville OH 
 615
 1,434
 
 2,049
 (337) 7/31/2013 1997


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Cincinnati OH 
 939
 1,408
 
 2,347
 (331) 7/31/2013 1980
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 723
 1,343
 
 2,066
 (316) 7/31/2013 1977
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 304
 1,264
 
 1,568
 (265) 3/26/2014 1974
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 288
 813
 
 1,101
 (171) 3/26/2014 1985
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 342
 848
 
 1,190
 (178) 3/26/2014 1973
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 274
 1,029
 
 1,303
 (224) 3/26/2014 2004
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 286
 869
 
 1,155
 (183) 3/26/2014 1977
Wendy's Dayton OH 
 259
 838
 
 1,097
 (176) 3/26/2014 1985
Wendy's Eaton OH 
 207
 1,084
 
 1,291
 (103) 3/26/2014 1993
Wendy's Englewood OH 
 261
 924
 
 1,185
 (194) 3/26/2014 1976
Wendy's Fairborn OH 
 629
 1,468
 
 2,097
 (345) 7/31/2013 1999
Wendy's Fairborn OH 
 604
 1,408
 
 2,012
 (331) 7/31/2013 1992
Wendy's Fairborn OH 
 271
 828
 
 1,099
 (174) 3/26/2014 1975
Wendy's Fairfield OH 
 794
 970
 
 1,764
 (228) 7/31/2013 1981
Wendy's Hamilton OH 
 655
 1,848
 
 2,503
 (465) 6/27/2013 2001
Wendy's Hamilton OH 
 697
 1,295
 
 1,992
 (305) 7/31/2013 1974
Wendy's Hamilton OH 
 908
 1,362
 
 2,270
 (320) 7/31/2013 2002
Wendy's Hillsboro OH 
 291
 1,408
 
 1,699
 (354) 6/27/2013 1985
Wendy's Lancaster OH 
 552
 1,025
 
 1,577
 (241) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Miamisburg OH 
 888
 1,086
 
 1,974
 (255) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Middletown OH 
 755
 1,133
 
 1,888
 (266) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Middletown OH 
 752
 920
 
 1,672
 (216) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Middletown OH 
 494
 1,481
 
 1,975
 (348) 7/31/2013 1977
Wendy's Saint Bernard OH 
 432
 1,009
 
 1,441
 (237) 7/31/2013 1985
Wendy's Springboro OH 
 891
 1,336
 
 2,227
 (314) 7/31/2013 1982
Wendy's Swanton OH 
 430
 1,233
 
 1,663
 (305) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Sylvania OH 
 300
 799
 
 1,099
 (197) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's West Carrollton OH 
 708
 865
 
 1,573
 (203) 7/31/2013 1979
Wendy's West Chester OH 
 944
 772
 
 1,716
 (182) 7/31/2013 1982
Wendy's West Chester OH 
 616
 924
 
 1,540
 (217) 7/31/2013 2005
Wendy's Whitehall OH 
 716
 863
 
 1,579
 (217) 6/27/2013 1983
Wendy's Wintersville OH 
 621
 1,449
 
 2,070
 (341) 7/31/2013 1977


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Edmond OK 
 791
 697
 
 1,488
 (146) 3/27/2014 1979
Wendy's Enid OK 
 158
 893
 
 1,051
 (210) 7/31/2013 2003
Wendy's Ponca City OK 
 529
 983
 
 1,512
 (231) 7/31/2013 1979
Wendy's Sayre PA 
 372
 1,115
 
 1,487
 (262) 7/31/2013 1994
Wendy's Anderson SC 
 734
 897
 
 1,631
 (346) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's Columbia SC 
 1,368
 
 
 1,368
 
 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Greenville SC 
 516
 631
 
 1,147
 (148) 7/31/2013 1975
Wendy's N. Myrtle Beach SC 
 464
 861
 
 1,325
 (202) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's Spartanburg SC 
 699
 572
 
 1,271
 (135) 7/31/2013 1977
Wendy's Brentwood TN 
 339
 1,356
 
 1,695
 (319) 7/31/2013 1982
Wendy's Crossville TN 
 190
 760
 
 950
 (179) 7/31/2013 1978
Wendy's Knoxville TN 
 330
 1,161
 
 1,491
 (287) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Knoxville TN 
 330
 1,132
 
 1,462
 (280) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Manchester TN 
 245
 1,390
 
 1,635
 (327) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Mcminnville TN 
 255
 1,443
 
 1,698
 (339) 7/31/2013 2010
Wendy's Millington TN 
 380
 1,208
 
 1,588
 (299) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Murfreesboro TN 
 586
 1,088
 
 1,674
 (256) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's Nashville TN 
 592
 1,100
 
 1,692
 (259) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's Nashville TN 
 328
 1,313
 
 1,641
 (309) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's Arlington TX 
 1,322
 1,546
 
 2,868
 (389) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Corpus Christi TX 
 646
 1,198
 
 1,844
 (282) 7/31/2013 1987
Wendy's El Paso TX 
 630
 1,889
 
 2,519
 (444) 7/31/2013 1996
Wendy's Kingwood TX 
 304
 1,724
 (944) 1,084
 (76) 7/31/2013 2001
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 268
 630
 
 898
 (158) 6/27/2013 1985
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 410
 451
 
 861
 (114) 6/27/2013 1987
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 707
 603
 
 1,310
 (126) 2/7/2014 1990
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 633
 1,388
 
 2,021
 (268) 2/7/2014 1992
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 1,007
 546
 
 1,553
 (118) 2/7/2014 1995
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 703
 45
 
 748
 (19) 2/7/2014 2000
Wendy's San Antonio TX 
 788
 45
 
 833
 (19) 2/7/2014 2003
Wendy's San Marcos TX 
 714
 1,024
 
 1,738
 (208) 2/7/2014 2002
Wendy's Schertz TX 
 793
 109
 
 902
 (27) 2/7/2014 1994


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Selma TX 
 841
 117
 
 958
 (25) 2/7/2014 2003
Wendy's Bluefield VA 
 450
 1,927
 
 2,377
 (476) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Christiansburg VA 
 416
 624
 
 1,040
 (147) 7/31/2013 1980
Wendy's Dublin VA 
 384
 1,401
 
 1,785
 (353) 6/27/2013 1993
Wendy's Emporia VA 
 631
 1,424
 
 2,055
 (359) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Hayes VA 
 304
 859
 
 1,163
 (216) 6/27/2013 1992
Wendy's Hillsville VA 
 324
 973
 
 1,297
 (229) 7/31/2013 2001
Wendy's Lebanon VA 
 431
 1,006
 
 1,437
 (237) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's Mechanicsville VA 
 521
 704
 
 1,225
 (177) 6/27/2013 1989
Wendy's North Tazewell VA 
 124
 560
 
 684
 (141) 6/27/2013 1980
Wendy's Pounding Mill VA 
 296
 1,404
 
 1,700
 (353) 6/27/2013 2004
Wendy's Woodbridge VA 
 1,193
 1,598
 
 2,791
 (402) 6/27/2013 1996
Wendy's Woodbridge VA 
 521
 615
 
 1,136
 (155) 6/27/2013 1978
Wendy's Wytheville VA 
 598
 897
 
 1,495
 (211) 7/31/2013 2003
Wendy's Bellingham WA 
 502
 477
 
 979
 (105) 2/7/2014 1994
Wendy's Bothell WA 
 687
 292
 
 979
 (50) 2/7/2014 2004
Wendy's Burlington WA 
 425
 806
 
 1,231
 (203) 6/27/2013 1994
Wendy's Port Angeles WA 
 422
 502
 
 924
 (187) 2/7/2014 1980
Wendy's Redmond WA 
 969
 123
 
 1,092
 (17) 2/7/2014 1977
Wendy's Silverdale WA 
 808
 201
 
 1,009
 (122) 2/7/2014 1995
Wendy's Beloit WI 
 1,138
 931
 
 2,069
 (219) 7/31/2013 2002
Wendy's Fitchburg WI 
 662
 1,230
 
 1,892
 (289) 7/31/2013 2003
Wendy's Germantown WI 
 419
 1,257
 
 1,676
 (296) 7/31/2013 1989
Wendy's Greenfield WI 
 487
 1,137
 
 1,624
 (267) 7/31/2013 2001
Wendy's Janesville WI 
 647
 971
 
 1,618
 (228) 7/31/2013 1991
Wendy's Kenosha WI 
 322
 1,290
 
 1,612
 (303) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Kenosha WI 
 965
 1,447
 
 2,412
 (340) 7/31/2013 1986
Wendy's Madison WI 
 454
 1,362
 
 1,816
 (320) 7/31/2013 1998
Wendy's Milwaukee WI 
 810
 810
 
 1,620
 (190) 7/31/2013 1979
Wendy's Milwaukee WI 
 338
 1,351
 
 1,689
 (318) 7/31/2013 1985
Wendy's Milwaukee WI 
 436
 1,015
 
 1,451
 (239) 7/31/2013 1983
Wendy's New Berlin WI 
 903
 739
 
 1,642
 (175) 7/31/2013 1983


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Wendy's Oak Creek WI 
 577
 1,347
 
 1,924
 (317) 7/31/2013 1999
Wendy's Sheboygan WI 
 676
 1,014
 
 1,690
 (238) 7/31/2013 1995
Wendy's West Allis WI 
 583
 1,083
 
 1,666
 (255) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Beaver WV 
 290
 1,156
 
 1,446
 (286) 6/27/2013 1995
Wendy's Bridgeport WV 
 273
 818
 
 1,091
 (192) 7/31/2013 1984
Wendy's Buckhannon WV 
 157
 890
 
 1,047
 (209) 7/31/2013 1987
Wendy's Clarksburg WV 
 277
 1,181
 
 1,458
 (248) 3/26/2014 1980
Wendy's Fairmont WV 
 224
 1,119
 
 1,343
 (282) 6/27/2013 1983
Wendy's Parkersburg WV 
 295
 885
 
 1,180
 (208) 7/31/2013 1979
Wendy's Parkersburg WV 
 311
 1,243
 
 1,554
 (292) 7/31/2013 1977
Wendy's Parkersburg WV 
 241
 964
 
 1,205
 (227) 7/31/2013 1996
Wendy's Ripley WV 
 273
 871
 
 1,144
 (219) 6/27/2013 1984
Wendy's Saint Marys WV 
 70
 1,322
 
 1,392
 (311) 7/31/2013 2001
Wendy's Vienna WV 
 301
 702
 
 1,003
 (165) 7/31/2013 1976
West Marine Anchorage AK 
 1,220
 2,531
 
 3,751
 (510) 3/31/2014 1995
West Marine Fort Lauderdale FL 
 4,337
 9,052
 
 13,389
 (1,669) 2/7/2014 2011
West Marine Harrison Township MI 
 452
 2,092
 
 2,544
 (538) 2/7/2014 2009
West Marine Deltaville VA 
 425
 2,409
 
 2,834
 (708) 7/31/2012 2012
Western Refining Foley MN 
 72
 276
 
 348
 (5) 3/27/2017 1984
Western Refining Pequot Lakes MN 
 158
 1,489
 
 1,647
 (29) 3/27/2017 1983
Western Refining Pierz MN 
 67
 411
 
 478
 (8) 3/27/2017 1996
Western Refining Sartell MN 
 718
 486
 
 1,204
 (10) 3/27/2017 2000
Western Refining Sauk Rapids MN 
 419
 753
 
 1,172
 (15) 3/27/2017 1997
Western Refining St. Cloud MN 
 582
 657
 
 1,239
 (13) 3/27/2017 1987
Western Refining St. Cloud MN 
 104
 136
 
 240
 (3) 3/27/2017 1922
Western Refining St. Cloud MN 
 126
 151
 
 277
 (3) 3/27/2017 1968
Western Refining St. Cloud MN 
 330
 365
 
 695
 (7) 3/27/2017 1984
Western Refining St. Cloud MN 
 361
 433
 
 794
 (9) 3/27/2017 1987
Western Refining Waite Park MN 
 316
 333
 
 649
 (7) 3/27/2017 1999
Western Refining Waite Park MN 
 770
 503
 
 1,273
 (10) 3/27/2017 1999
Whataburger Edna TX 
 290
 869
 
 1,159
 (204) 7/31/2013 1986
Whataburger El Campo TX 
 693
 1,013
 
 1,706
 (255) 6/27/2013 1986


       Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2017
(3) (4)
      
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2017
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements  Accumulated Depreciation
(3) (5)
 Date Acquired Date of Construction
Whataburger Ingleside TX 
 1,106
 474
 
 1,580
 (111) 7/31/2013 1986
Whataburger Lubbock TX 
 432
 647
 
 1,079
 (152) 7/31/2013 1992
Whole Foods Hinsdale IL 5,709
 5,499
 7,388
 
 12,887
 (1,658) 2/7/2014 1999
Wild Bill's Sports Salon Rochester MN 
 1,347
 1,102
 
 2,449
 (292) 7/31/2013 1993
Willbros Group, Inc. Tulsa OK 
 2,239
 6,375
 
 8,614
 (935) 6/25/2014 1982
Williams Sonoma Olive Branch MS 
 2,330
 44,266
 
 46,596
 (14,115) 8/10/2012 2001
Winn-Dixie Jacksonville FL 63,240
 4,360
 82,834
 
 87,194
 (19,318) 4/24/2013 2000
Worrior Energy Services Midland TX 
 508
 815
 
 1,323
 (146) 6/25/2014 2012
Other N/A N/A 
 
 13,345
 
 13,345
 (2,975) N/A N/A
      $2,071,038
 $2,907,509
 $10,769,845
 $(99,654) $13,577,700
 $(2,217,108)    
        Initial Costs (1) Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (2) Gross Amount
Carried at
December 31, 2019
(3) (4)
 Accumulated Depreciation    
Property City State Encumbrances at
December 31, 2019
 Land Buildings, Fixtures and Improvements    Date Acquired Date of Construction
Bread & Butter Shop Marshfield WI 
 158
 1,206
 
 1,364
 (5) 11/14/2019  1987
Bread & Butter Shop Marshfield WI 
 239
 933
 
 1,172
 (4) 11/14/2019  1995
Bread & Butter Shop Marshfield WI 
 474
 1,673
 
 2,147
 (7) 11/14/2019  2009
Bread & Butter Shop Stratford WI 
 66
 366
 
 432
 (2) 11/14/2019  1985
Bread & Butter Shop Wisconsin Rapids WI 
 309
 986
 
 1,295
 (5) 11/14/2019  1988
Bread & Butter Shop Wisconsin Rapids WI 
 287
 569
 
 856
 (3) 11/14/2019  1998
Bread & Butter Shop Nekoosa WI 
 302
 936
 
 1,238
 (4) 11/14/2019  1998
La-Z-Boy Kennesaw GA 
 1,942
 4,539
 
 6,481
 (17) 11/22/2019  1995
La-Z-Boy McDonough GA 
 1,215
 3,219
 
 4,434
 (14) 11/22/2019  2018
La-Z-Boy Fleming Island FL 
 876
 4,244
 
 5,120
 (15) 11/22/2019  2007
Fas Mart Lottsburg VA 
 341
 906
 
 1,247
 (5) 11/25/2019  1986
Fas Mart Cobbs Creek VA 
 927
 1,470
 
 2,397
 (8) 11/25/2019  1991
Fas Mart Colonial Beach VA 
 262
 1,151
 
 1,413
 (4) 11/25/2019  1990
E-Z Mart Fayetteville AR 
 126
 1,051
 
 1,177
 (5) 11/25/2019  1990
E-Z Mart Texarkana TX 
 70
 371
 
 441
 (2) 11/25/2019  1996
E-Z Mart Mt Pleasant TX 
 484
 1,329
 
 1,813
 (8) 11/25/2019  1997
E-Z Mart New Boston TX 
 724
 1,791
 
 2,515
 (10) 11/25/2019  1994
Fas Mart Kilmarnock VA 
 519
 1,349
 
 1,868
 (8) 11/25/2019  1980
Best Buy Newport News VA 
 7,678
 9,619
 
 17,297
 (11) 12/18/2019  1994
Topgolf Schaumburg IL 
 14,103
 28,296
 
 42,399
 (49) 12/30/2019  2019
Aaron's Sheridan AR 
 116
 852
 
 968
 (1) 12/31/2019  1998
Aaron's Aiken SC 
 512
 812
 
 1,324
 (1) 12/31/2019  1995
Aaron's Niles OH 
 114
 1,509
 
 1,623
 (2) 12/31/2019  1972
      $1,529,057
 $2,786,282
 $10,186,554
 $(33,607) $12,939,229
 $(2,727,099)    

(1)Initial costs exclude subsequent impairment charges.
(2)Consists of capital expenditures and real estate development costs, net of condemnations, easements and impairment charges.
(3)Gross intangible lease assets of $2.04$1.9 billion and the associated accumulated amortization of $690.9$867.2 million are not reflected in the table above.
(4)The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes of land, buildings, fixtures and improvements as of December 31, 20172018 was $15.6$13.0 billion.
(5)Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements.

The following is a reconciliation of the gross real estate activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Balance, beginning of year $13,539,921
 $14,566,343
 $15,857,507
 $13,592,440
 $13,577,700
 $13,539,921
Additions:            
Acquisitions 634,080
 91,052
 33,695
 351,135
 437,227
 634,080
Improvements 28,503
 25,781
 60,321
 56,446
 31,898
 28,503
Deductions/Other:            
Dispositions (505,403) (878,552) (1,261,724) (947,403) (368,808) (505,403)
Impairments (82,292) (228,750) (106,064) (81,078) (84,278) (82,292)
Reclassified to assets held for sale (52,376) (36,722) (16,761) (33,724) (2,997) (52,376)
Other 15,267
 769
 (631) 1,413
 1,698
 15,267
Balance, end of year $13,577,700
 $13,539,921
 $14,566,343
 $12,939,229
 $13,592,440
 $13,577,700




The following is a reconciliation of the accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (amounts in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Balance, beginning of year $2,622,879
 $2,217,108
 $1,766,006
Additions:      
Depreciation expense 352,531
 497,511
 548,901
Deductions/Other:      
Dispositions (201,319) (57,346) (34,086)
Impairments (34,847) (32,147) (50,828)
Reclassified to assets held for sale (7,602) (400) (12,885)
Other (4,543) (1,847) 
Balance, end of year $2,727,099
 $2,622,879
 $2,217,108

  Years Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Balance, beginning of year $1,766,006
 $1,331,751
 $775,050
Additions:      
Depreciation expense 548,901
 586,321
 630,347
Deductions:      
Dispositions (34,086) (77,987) (49,907)
Impairments (50,828) (69,040) (23,196)
Reclassified to assets held for sale (12,885) (5,039) (543)
Balance, end of year $2,217,108
 $1,766,006
 $1,331,751




F-204F-178

Table of Contents
VEREIT, INC. AND VEREIT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
SCHEDULE IV MORTGAGE LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENTON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 20172019 (in thousands)


Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans Held For Investmenton Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company decided to sell its mortgage notes receivable and classified them as held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold all outstanding mortgage notes receivable.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Beginning Balance $10,164
 $20,294
 $22,764
Deductions during the year:      
Early payoff of loan investment 
 
 (1,502)
Sale of loan investments (9,946) (8,256) 
Principal payments received on loan investments (106) (897) (904)
Amortization of unearned discounts and premiums (19) 15
 (64)
Valuation allowance (93) (992) 
Ending Balance $

$10,164

$20,294

Description Location Interest Rate Final Maturity Date Periodic Payment Terms Prior Liens Face Amount of Mortgages Carrying Amount of Mortgages Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest
Long-Term Mortgage Loans
Bank Of America, N.A. Mt. Airy, MD 6.42% 12/15/2026 P&I N/A $2,418
 $2,618
 $
CVS Caremark Corporation Evansville, IN 6.22% 1/15/2033 P&I N/A 2,571
 2,812
 
CVS Caremark Corporation Greensboro, GA 6.52% 1/15/2030 P&I N/A 952
 1,053
 
CVS Caremark Corporation Shelby Twp., MI 5.98% 1/15/2031 P&I N/A 1,928
 2,067
 
Lowes Companies, Inc. Framingham, MA 5.87% 9/15/2031 (1) N/A 5,953
 2,169
 
Walgreen Co. Dallas, TX 6.46% 12/15/2029 P&I N/A 2,390
 2,636
 
Walgreen Co. Nacogdoches, TX 6.80% 9/15/2030 P&I N/A 2,633
 2,953
 
Walgreen Co. Rosemead, CA 6.26% 12/15/2029 P&I N/A 3,651
 3,986
 
Total           $22,496
 $20,294
 $

(1) Zero coupon rate with balloon payment due at maturity.
F-179
  Years Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Beginning Balance $22,764
 $24,238
 $26,806
Deductions during the year:      
Early payoff of loan investment (1,502) 
 
Principal payments received on loan investments (904) (1,339) (2,417)
Amortization of unearned discounts and premiums (64) (135) (151)
Ending Balance $20,294
 $22,764
 $24,238