UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017
Commission file number 0-14938

 

HG HOLDINGS, INC.STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. (formerly known as Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.)

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

Delaware

54-1272589

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)        

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.No.)

2115 E. 7200 North Hamiltonth Street, No. 200, High Point,Suite 101, Charlotte, North Carolina 2726028211

     (Address(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

 

RegistrantRegistrant’s’s telephone number, including area code: (336) 884-7700(252)355-4610

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                          Title of each class                                                                        Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $.02 per share Nasdaq Stock MarketNone

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NoneCommon Stock, par value $.02 per share, Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: Yes ( ) No (x)

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: Yes ( ) No (x)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes (x)(x) No ( )

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.504 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (X)(X) No ( )

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’sRegistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ( )

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, (check one):

Large accelerated filer ( )                    Accelerated filer ( )                    Non-accelerated filer ( )                    Smaller reporting company (x)                    Emerging growth company ( )

                           (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes (x) No ( ) No (x)

 

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant based on the closing price on June 26, 2015:  $40July 1, 2017: $13 million.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’sRegistrant’s classes of common stock as of February 19, 2016:March 20, 2018:

Common Stock, par value $.02 per share

                    15,105,14514,783,317                     

                                (Class(Class of Common Stock)                                          Stock

Number of Shares

 

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the Registrant’sRegistrant’s Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for May 19, 2016 are incorporated by reference into Part III.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Part ITABLE OF CONTENTSPage
Part IPage
Item 1Business3
Item 1ARisk Factors6

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

8

Item 2

Properties9

Properties

  8

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

9

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

9

Part II
Item 5Market for Registrant’sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities9
Item 6Selected Financial Data10
Item 6Selected Financial Data11
Item 7ManagementManagement’s’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations1210
Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk1816
Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data1816
Item 9Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure1816
Item 9AControls and Procedures1816
Item 9BOther Information1817
Part III
Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance1917
Item 11Executive Compensation1917
Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters1918
Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

19

18
Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services1918
Part IV
Item 15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules2018
Item 1Signatures62310-K Summary21
Signatures22
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and ScheduleF-1


 

2PART I

 


 

Table of Contents


Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.  

PART I

Item 1.BusinessBusiness

 

General

 

EstablishedWe were incorporated in 1924,Delaware in 1984. Until March 2, 2018, we arewere a leading design, marketing and overseas sourcingdistribution resource in the middle-to-upscaleupscale segment of the wood residential furniture market. We offeroffered a diversified product line supported by an overseas sourcing model. We marketmarketed our brands through a network of brick-and-mortar furniture retailers, online retailers and interior designers worldwide. We also marketOn March 2, 2018, we sold substantially all our assets and sell directlychanged our name to the consumer through a localized approach to e-commerce order fulfillment through our brick-and-mortar customers.  We were incorporated in Delaware in 1984.HG Holdings, Inc.

 

AProductssset Sale

 

On March 2, 2018, we sold substantially all of our assets (the “Asset Sale”) to Churchill Downs LLC (“Buyer”), pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2017, as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated January 22, 2018 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). We retained certain assets, which we refer to as excluded assets, including:

cash in the amount of approximately $0.8 million, including restricted cash in an amount equal to approximately $0.6 million;

the rights to and interest in any distributions after the closing date of monies collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act and to distributions of any prepaid legal expenses held by the Committee for Legal Trade relating thereto;

a split dollar life insurance policy for a former executive officer and related collateral assignment providing for repayment at death of premiums we paid;

the corporate seals, organizational documents, minute books, stock books, tax returns, books of account or other records having to do with our corporate organization;

all insurance policies and all rights to applicable claims and proceeds under our insurance policies with respect to the excluded assets or excluded liabilities;

certain of our agreements and contracts, including indemnification agreements between us and our directors, the services agreement with our registered accounting firm and the separation agreement between us and our former chief executive officer and the change in control protection agreement between us and our current principal financial officer;

certain of our employee benefit plans, including our incentive compensation plans and annual bonus plan;

all of our tax assets, including our net operating loss carryforwards and any tax refunds and prepayments;

all rights to any action, suit or claim of any nature with respect to any excluded asset or excluded liability;

all guarantees, warranties, indemnities and similar rights in favor of us with respect to any excluded asset or excluded liability;

all of our rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement and any related document; and

all records, correspondence and other materials prepared by or on behalf of us in connection with the Asset Sale Transaction.

As consideration for the Asset Sale, Buyer paid a purchase price consisting of cash in the amount of approximately $10.8 million (of which approximately $1.3 million was used to pay the outstanding amount under our credit agreement), a subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of approximately $7.4 million, and a 5% equity interest in Buyer’s post-closing ultimate parent company, Churchill Downs Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands business company. Buyer also assumed substantially all our liabilities; however, we retained certain liabilities, which we refer to as excluded liabilities, including:

liabilities or obligations with respect to an excluded asset including the separation agreement with our former President and Chief Executive Officer and certain worker’s compensation claims associated with our restricted cash;

dividends payable with respect to restricted shares of our common stock awarded under our incentive compensation plans and annual bonus plan; and
costs and expenses incurred by us in connection with the negotiation, preparation and performance of the Asset Purchase Agreement and any related agreements or documents.


We anticipate that our expenses relating to the Asset Sale following the closing of the Asset Sale will be approximately $2.8 million, which includes financial advisory fees, legal fees, amounts owed under our Change in Control Protection Agreement with our principal financial officer, amounts owed to our former chief executive officer under the terms of his separation agreement, and other fees and expenses.

As previously announced, we do not intend to liquidate following the closing of the Asset Sale.   We also previously indicated our board of directors would evaluate alternatives for use of the cash consideration, which were expected to include using a portion of the cash to either repurchase our common stock or pay a special dividend to stockholders and also using a portion of the cash to acquire non-furniture related assets that will allow us to potentially derive a benefit from its net operating loss carryforwards. Our board of directors has determined not to pay a special dividend, but to use our existing authorization for stock repurchases to repurchase our common stock from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at prices we deem appropriate. Our board anticipates retaining the remaining cash for use in acquiring non-furniture related assets and to fund operating expenses until an acquisition.  Our board is also considering a rights offering of our common stock to existing stockholders to raise additional cash for acquisition purposes which could provide us greater resources and flexibility in acquiring non-furniture assets.      

Former Business

Products. Until March 2, 2018, our products arewere marketed as fashionable wood residential home furnishings which differentiatedifferentiated from other products in the market through styling execution as well as wide selections for the entire home including dining, bedroom, living room, home office, home entertainment, accent items and nursery and youth furniture. Our target consumer rangesranged from an affluent, discerning consumer utilizing the talents of an interior designer, to a more practical consumer driven to purchase by convenience, immediate gratification from stock availability or a particular retail event.  Regardless, we target a consumer who values the interior aesthetics of the home.

We believe that our products represent good value and that the quality and design of our furniture combined with our broad selection and dependable service differentiates our products in the marketplace.

 

We provided products in a variety of wood species and finishes. Our products arewere designed to appeal to a broad range of consumer tastes in the middle-to-upscaleupscale segment and cover all major style categories.

 

We continually designed and developdeveloped new styles to replace those we discontinuediscontinued and to expand our product lines into markets where opportunity for growth exists.lines. Our in-house product development process which normally takes approximately one year but can be shorter or longer based upon the complexity of the concept, beginsbegan with identifying customer preferences and marketplace trends and conceptualizing product ideas. Company designers produceproduced a variety of sketches from which prototype furniture pieces arewere built for review prior to full-scale engineering and production. We consultconsulted with our marketing and operations personnel, core suppliers, independent sales representatives and selected customers throughout this process and introduceintroduced our new product designs primarily at the international furniture marketsmarket in High Point, North Carolina, and Las Vegas, Nevada, which are eachis held two times per year for a total of four markets. 

During the second quarter of 2014, we announced the end of domestic production of our Young America nursery and youth furniture brand since revenues remained below levels needed to reach profitability as a domestic manufacturer within a reasonable amount of time. Marketed as a product offering with salient features such as a wide variety of semi-custom color choices, broad item selection and the cache of a product Made in USA, the Young America brand could not be duplicated through an overseas sourcing model.  The sale and closure of the supporting manufacturing facility in the second half of 2014 represented the end of our domestic manufacturing of nursery and youth furniture.    

In January 2015, we announced our plans to re-enter the nursery and youth furniture market with a mid-year product launch sourced overseas.  Our Stone & Leigh brand of nursery and youth was introduced at the High Point Market in April 2015. year.

 

Marketing/BrandMarketing/Brandss

We believe that the diversity of our product offerings enables us to anticipate and address changing consumer preferences and provide retailers a complete wood furniture resource in the middle-to-upscale segment.  . Our products arewere marketed under the Stanley Furniture brand, but also under sub-brands including Coastal Living® and Stone & Leigh.Leigh brands, and also under a licensing agreement with Coastal Living® magazine. We marketmarketed our brand through a series of efforts targeted both to the wholesale trade and directly to the consumer. Coastal Living® is a registered trademark of Time Inc. Lifestyle Group and iswas used under license.

3


Table This licensing arrangement was not renewed at the end of Contents2017, but the terms of the license agreement permitted us to sell current designs under the licensed brand name until the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2018.

 

DistributionDistribution.

We havehad developed a broad domestic and international customer base. We sellsold our furniture mainly through independent sales representatives to a variety of wholesale customers such as owner-operated furniture stores, interior design & architecture professionals, decorators, smaller specialty retailers, regional furniture chains, buying clubs and e-commerce retailers. We also market and sell directly to the consumer through a localized approach to e-commerce order fulfillment through our brick-and-mortar customer.  We believe this broad network reduces exposure to fluctuations in regional economic conditions, places our brand in as many venues as possible where the consumer may shop and allows us to capitalize on emerging channels of distribution.  We offeroffered tailored marketing programs to address each specific distribution channel. Our independent sales representatives along with our customer care managers sellsold and supportsupported our products.

 


In 2015,2017, we sold product to approximately 1,4002,800 customers and recorded approximately 10%9% of our sales from international customers. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales in 20152017 and no part of the business iswas dependent upon a single customer, the loss of which would have had a material effect on our business.  The loss of several major customers could have a material impact on our business.

 

Overseas Sourcing

. Our product is currentlywas sourced from independently owned factories in Southeast Asia, primarily in Vietnam.Vietnam and Indonesia. We operateoperated a support organization in each country to manage partner-vendor relationships.  In early 2016, we established a strategic manufacturing alliance with one such source in Vietnam outside of Ho Chi Minh City: Starwood Manufacturing VN Corporation.  This strategic alliance allows for the utilization of a stand-alone, dedicated manufacturing facility in which we have the ability to engineer our designs specifically for the efficiency of this factory, schedule and supervise production to satisfy our specific customers’ demands and provide quality assurance.  We maintain exclusive rights to utilize the stand-alone facility for as long as we meet certain volume goals for the facility’s capacity utilization.  While we are not obligated to utilize the capacity of the facility should certain market-driven and/or competitive factors notrelationships, make this factory our best choice, our intentions are to transition substantially all of our products to this facility.

We are subject to the usual risks inherent in importing products manufactured abroad, including, but not limited to, supply disruptions and delays, port related issues that lead to delays, currency exchange rate fluctuations, economic and political developments and instability,sourcing decisions, as well as the laws, policiesto provide engineering and actions of foreign governments and the United States affecting trade, including tariffs.quality control functions.

 

A sudden disruption in our supply chain from Starwood or any of our key vendors could significantly compromise our ability to fill customers’ orders and service gaps and short-term increases in cost would likely result.  However,Generally, we believe that we could source most impacted products from other overseas suppliers.  We believe maintaining more control over the various aspects of the manufacturing and sourcing process mitigates risk, and therefore believe that our strategic manufacturing alliance give our company a potential competitive operational advantage versus certain competitors.

We enterentered into standard purchase arrangements with certain overseas suppliers, including Starwood, for finished goods inventory.inventory with our overseas vendors. The terms of these arrangements arewere customary for our industry and dodid not contain any long-term purchase obligations. We generally negotiatenegotiated firm pricing with our foreign suppliers in U.S. Dollars for a term of one year. We acceptaccepted exposure to exchange rate movement after thisthat period and dodid not use any derivative instruments to manage or hedge currency risk. We generally expectexpected to recover any substantial price increases from these suppliers in the price we charge our own customers for these goods.

 

LogisticsLogistics.

We warehousewarehoused our products primarily in domestic warehouses with some warehousing abroad. We considerconsidered our facilities to be generally modern, well equipped and well maintained. We useused a small group of furniture specific transportation providers for delivery. While most of our products arewere delivered to retailers from our warehouses, we also shipshipped directly to wholesale customers from Asia and provideAsia. Our transportation vendor base included white-glove delivery services which deliver directly to the end consumer from our domestic warehouses.warehouses to the retail consumer.

 

Products areProducts were ordered from overseas suppliers based upon both actual and forecasted demand. Because long lead times are generally associated with overseas operations, we strivestrived to maintain inventory levels that willwould service most of our wholesale customers’ orders within a maximum of 30 days from receipt of their order. Our backlog of unshipped orders was $6.2$4.2 million at December 31, 20152017 and $6.6$6.3 million at December 31, 2014.2016.    

 

4


Table of Contents

CCompetitionompetition

. The furniture industry is highly competitive, fragmented, and includes a large number of competitors. The barriers to entry are very low, and there is little feasible intellectual property protection in ourthis industry to prevent competitors from imitating furniture designs of another manufacturer. Very few of our competitors manufacture residential wood residential furniture in the United States.

 

We competecompeted with a host of varying business models within the industry including, but not limited to, former manufacturers who have adopted a strictly pass-through model from overseas vendor to wholesale customers; national lifestyle retailers who sell directly to the retail consumer through an omni-channel distribution and marketing model (use of physical channels and digital channels to offer a seamless and unified customer experience);vertical model; and overseas vendors who sell directly to wholesale customers. Some competitors have greater financial resources and often offer extensively advertised, highly promoted product. 

 

Competitive factors in the middle-to-upscaleupscale segment of the industry include design, quality, service, selection and price. We believe the flexibility and controlrelative influence we maintain over our operations model,maintained with overseas vendors, the continued diversification of our distribution strategy, our long-standing customer relationships, our customer responsiveness to customers, our consistent support of high-quality and diverse product lines, the heritage of our brand and our experienced management team arewere all competitive advantages.

 

TrademarksAssociates.

At December 31, 2015, we employed approximately 71 associates domestically and 29 associates overseas, all of which are full-time employees.  We consider our relationship with our associates to be good.  None of our associates are represented by a labor union. 

Trademarks

Our former trade names representrepresented many years of continued business, and we believe these names arewere well recognized and associated with excellent quality and styling in the furniture industry. We ownowned a number of trademarks and design patents, none of which arewere considered to be material.

 

Governmental Regulations

. We arewere subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the areas of safety, health and environmental protection. Compliance with these laws and regulations has not in the past had any material effect on our earnings, capital expenditures or competitive position.  However, the impact of such compliance in the future cannot be predicted.  We believe that we arewere in material compliance with applicable federal, state and local safety, health and environmental regulations.

 

Associates. At December 31, 2017, we employed 64 associates domestically and 45 associates overseas, all of which are full-time employees. None of our associates were or are represented by a labor union. Following the Asset Sale and the departure of our current principal financial and accounting officer on March 31, 2018, we will have two part-time employees.


Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain statements made in this report are not based on historical facts, but are forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could”,“could,” or “anticipates,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. These statements reflect our reasonable judgment with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include disruptionsthe occurrence of events that negatively impact the Company’s liquidity in foreign sourcing including those arisingsuch a way as to limit or eliminate the Company’s ability to use proceeds from supplythe Asset Sale to fund stock repurchases or distribution disruptionsasset acquisitions, or those arising from changes in political, economic and social conditions, as well as laws and regulations, in countries from which we source products, international trade policiesan inability on the part of the United States and countries from which we source products,Company to identify a suitable business to acquire or develop with the inability to raise prices in response to inflation and increasing costs, lower sales due to worsening of current economic conditions, the cyclical natureproceeds of the furniture industry, business failures or loss of large customers, failure to anticipate or respond to changes in consumer tastes, fashions and perceived values in a timely manner, competition in the furniture industry,  insolvency of the insurance company that holds our corporate-owned life insurance policies, environmental, health, and safety  compliance costs, and failure or interruption of our information technology infrastructure.Asset Sale, Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this filing and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new developments or otherwise.

 

5


Table of Contents

Available Information

 

Our principal Internet address is www.stanleyfurniture.com.www.hgholdingsinc.net. We make available free of charge on this web site our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

In addition, you may request a copy of these filings (excluding exhibits) at no cost by writing, telephoning faxing or e-mailing us at the following address, telephone number fax number or e-mail address:address:

 

Stanley Furniture Company,HG Holdings, Inc.

200 North Hamilton2115 E. 7th Street, No. 200Suite 101

High Point,Charlotte, North Carolina 2726028211

Attention: Ms. Anita MW. Wimmerr. Brad Garner

Telephone: 336-884-7698, Fax: 336-884-7760252-355-4610

Or e-mail your request to:Investor@Stanleyfurniture.com investor@hgholdingsinc.net

 

Item 1A.Risk Factors

  

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

AnOur results investment in our common stock involves a high degree of operations and financial condition can be adversely affected by numerous risks.risk. You should consider carefully consider the specific risk factors detaileddescribed below in conjunction withaddition to the other information contained in this document.  ShouldAnnual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before making a decision to invest in our common stock. If any of these risks actually materialize,occurs, our business, financial condition, and futureresults of operations or prospects could be materially and adversely affected. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline and a loss of all or part of your investment.

We have no material operations and have limited sources of revenue following the Asset Sale, which may negatively impacted.impact the value and liquidity of our common stock.

 

As a result of the Asset Sale, we have no material operations and no sources of revenue other than payments, if any, of interest and principal under the subordinated secured promissory note we received from Buyer as part of the consideration for the Asset Sale, any remaining payments to be made to us under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, and repayment at death of premiums we have paid for a split dollar life insurance policy for a former executive officer. Although the alternatives under evaluation by our relianceboard for the use of the proceeds from the Asset Sale includes funding, at least in part, the acquisition of non-furniture related assets, there can be no guarantee that suitable assets will be available for us to purchase or that any assets acquired will generate the revenues anticipated or any revenue at all. A failure by us to secure additional sources of revenue following the closing of the Asset Sale could negatively impact the value and liquidity of our common stock.

We may not receive the amount owed us under the subordinated secured promissory note we received from Buyer as part of the consideration for the Asset Sale.

The subordinated secured promissory note we received from Buyer as part of the consideration for the Asset Sale will mature, and the entire principal amount will be payable on, foreign sourcing forthe date that is five years after the closing of the Asset Sale. Buyer’s obligations under this note, including its payment obligations, and our productsrights and remedies with respect to the collateral pledged by Buyer under this note is subordinate to Buyer’s obligations under, and the lender’s rights with respect to, Buyer’s senior secured loan facility, including the lender’s rights to the collateral pledged by Buyer in connection with its senior secured loan facility. As a result, there can be no guarantee that Buyer will pay us any portion of the interest or principal due under this note or that upon any default by Buyer we will have access to any of the collateral pledged by Buyer under this note.

An “ownership change” could limit the use of our net operating loss carryforwards and our potential to derive a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards.:

 

·       OurIf an “ownership change” occurs pursuant to applicable statutory regulations, we are potentially subject to limitations on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards which in turn could adversely impact our potential to derive a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards. While we have entered into a rights agreement designed to preserve and protect our net operating loss carryforwards, there is no guarantee that the rights agreement will prevent us from experiencing an ownership change and, therefore, having a limitation on our ability to service customers could be adversely affected and resultuse our net operating loss carryforwards. In general, an “ownership change” would occur if there is a cumulative change in lower sales, earnings and liquidity.the ownership of our common stock of more than 50% by one or more “5% shareholders” during a three-year test period

 

We will continue to incur the expense of complying with public company reporting requirements following the closing of the Asset Sale.

After the Asset Sale, we continue to be required to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), even though compliance with such reporting requirements is economically burdensome.


Our supply of goods could be interrupted for a variety of reasons. Physical damagecommon stock was delisted from a natural disaster, fire or other cause to any one of our sourcing partners’ factories could interrupt production for an extended period of time.We may reject goods that do not meet our specifications causing delays to the receipt of goods and/or requiring us to identifyNASDAQ Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) following the Asset Sale, and utilize alternative sourcing arrangements at a higher cost, or possibly forcing us to discontinue the product.  Also, delivery of goods from our foreign sourcing partnersthere may be delayed for reasons not typically encountered with domestic manufacturing or sourcing, such as shipment delays caused by customs or labor issues.reduced ability to trade our common stock.

 

Because we will no longer have an operating business as a result of the Asset Sale, we were notified that, in ·       Our abilityNasdaq’s view, we no longer satisfied the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and our common stock was delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market pursuant to properly forecast customer demand while operating within the inherent extended lead timesNasdaq’s authority under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5101. While trading of an overseas sourcing model could result in lower sales, earnings and liquidity.

Extended lead times may adversely affect our ability to respond to sudden changes in demand, resultingcommon stock is currently conducted in the purchaseover-the-counter market on the OTCQB, such trading could substantially reduce the market liquidity of excess inventory in the face of declining demand, or lost sales due to insufficient inventory in the face of increasing demand, either of which could haveour common stock. As a result, an adverse effect on our sales, earnings and liquidity.

·       Changes in political, economic and social conditions, as well as laws and regulations, in the countries from which we source products could adversely affect us.

Foreign sourcing is subject to political and social instability in countries where our sourcing partners are located.  This could makeinvestor may find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for us to service our customers.  Also, significant fluctuations of foreign exchange rates against the value of the U.S. dollar could increase our costs, decrease earnings and/or negatively affect the businessprice of, our suppliers overseas.  

·       International trade policies of the United States and countries from which we source products could adversely affect us.common stock.

 

ImpositionFailure to successfully identify, acquire and operate non-furniture related assets could cause our stock price to decline.

Following the closing of trade sanctions relating to imports, taxes, import duties and other charges on imports could limit our ability to source productthe Asset Sale, we are evaluating alternatives for using cash proceeds from the impacted countriesAsset Sale to acquire non-furniture related assets. We have not identified any assets for acquisition and increase our costs, thus decreasing our earnings.

6


Table of Contents

·         Changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar compared to the currencies for the countries from which we obtain our products or other influential foreign currencies, could adversely affect our sales, earnings and liquidity.

For imported products, we generally negotiate firm pricing with our foreign suppliers in U.S. Dollars, typically for periods of at least one year. We accept the exposure to exchange rate movements beyond these negotiated periods. We do not use derivative financial instruments to manage this risk but could choose to do so in the future. Since we transact our imported product purchases in U.S. Dollars, a relative decline in the value of the U.S Dollar could increase the price we must pay for imported products beyond the negotiated periods. In addition, valuation changes in other leading foreign countries could adversely affect the business of our sourcing partners and therefore, adversely affect us.  These price changes could decrease our sales, earnings and liquidity during affected periods.

We are currently transitioning the manufacturing of substantially all our products to a single contract manufacturer and the loss of this contract manufacturer, or its inability to satisfy our quality or other requirements, could severely disrupt the production and supply of our products resulting in lower sales, earnings and liquidity. 

We are in the process of transitioning the manufacturing of substantially all our products to a single contract manufacturer located outside Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam in connection with our strategic manufacturing alliance with Starwood Manufacturing VN Corporation.  Any financial, operational or other difficulties involving this manufacturer could adversely affect us.  The loss of our relationship with our manufacturer, or its inability to conduct its manufacturing services for us as anticipated in terms of cost, quality, and timeliness, could adversely affect our ability to fill customer orders.  In addition, it could be costly and require a long period of time to move products to another manufacturer.  If any of these were to occur, the supply of our products could be severely disrupted resulting in lower sales, earnings and liquidity. 

We may not be able to maintainidentify profitable assets or to raise pricesoperate acquired assets profitability. If we are not successful in response to inflation and/or increasing costs.identifying, acquiring and operating non-furniture related assets, our stock price may decline.

 

Future marketWe will likely have no operating history in the business of non- furniture related assets to be acquired, and competitive pressurestherefore we will be subject to the risks inherent in establishing a new line of business.

We have not identified assets to be acquired or their line or lines of business and, therefore, we cannot fully describe the specific risks presented by such business. It is likely that we will have had no operating history in the line of business of assets to be acquired, and it is possible that any assets that we may prohibit us from successfully raising pricesacquire will have a limited operating history in its business. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our future operations will generate operating or net income, and as such our success will be subject to offset increased coststhe risks, expenses, problems and delays inherent in establishing a new line of finished goods, freightbusiness for us. The ultimate success of such new business cannot be assured.

Resources will be expended in researching potential acquisitions that might not be consummated.

The investigation of non-furniture company assets for acquisition and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements and other inflationary items.  This could lowerdocuments will require substantial management time and attention in addition to costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to complete a specific acquisition, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached relating to a specific acquisition, we may fail to consummate the acquisition for any number of reasons including those beyond our earnings.control.

 

Ownership may become diluted if we conduct a rights offering.

Our board is considering a rights offering to raise additional cash for acquisition purposes. If we conduct a rights offering and you do not participate, you will experience dilution in your ownership.

If we do not acquire sufficient assets by March 2019, we may be required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Under Section 3(a)(l)(C) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"), an issuer is deemed to be an investment company if it is engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer's total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The 1940 Act defines “investment securities” broadly to include virtually all securities except U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves regulated or exempt investment companies. Consequently, the subordinated promissory note we received from Buyer as part of the consideration for the Asset Sale may be considered an investment security and we may fall within the scope of Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act.

A company that falls within the scope of Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act can avoid being regulated as an investment company if it can rely on certain of the exclusions under the 1940 Act. One such exclusion that we believe applies is Rule 3a-2 under the 1940 Act, which allows a 3(a)(1)(C) investment company (as a "transient investment company") a grace period of one year from the date of classification (in our case, the date of the Asset Sale, which was March 2, 2018) to avoid registration under the 1940 Act, so long as it does not intend to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities. We do not intend to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities within the meaning of the 1940 Act.

We are evaluating alternatives for using cash proceeds from the Asset Sale for the acquisition of non-furniture related assets. If we do not acquire sufficient assets within one year from closing the Asset Sale to cause us to no longer be an investment company, we could become subject to the 1940 Act and be required to register under the 1940 Act. Registered investment companies are subject to extensive, restrictive and potentially adverse regulation relating to, among other things, operating methods, management, capital structure, dividends and transactions with affiliates.

If we are required to register under the 1940 Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would increase our operating expenses.

Our common stock may be deemed a “penny stock.”

Our common stock may be considered a "penny stock" as defined in the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder, unless the price of our shares of common stock is at least $5.00. We expect that our share price will remain less than $5.00. Unless our common stock is otherwise excluded from the definition of “penny stock”, the penny stock rules apply. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that the broker dealer, not otherwise exempt from such rules, must make a special written determination that the penny stock is suitable for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure rules have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. So long as our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules, the level of trading activity could be limited and it may be difficult for investors to sell our common stock.


Following the closing of the Asset Sale, we became a “shell company” under the federal securities laws.

As a result of the Asset Sale, we no longer have an operating business, and accordingly, alter the closing of the Asset Sale, we became a shell company as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act and Exchange Act Rule 12b-2. Applicable securities rules prohibit shell companies from using a Form S-8 registration statement to register securities pursuant to employee compensation plans and from utilizing Form S-3 for the registration of securities for so long as we are a shell company and for 12 months thereafter.

Additionally, Form 8-K requires shell companies to provide more detailed disclosure upon completion of a transaction that causes it to cease being a shell company. To the extent that we acquire non-furniture related assets in the future, we would be required to file a current report on Form 8-K containing the financial and other information required in a registration statement on Form 10 within four business days following completion of such a transaction.

To assist the Securities and Exchange Commission in the identification of shell companies, we are required to check a box on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our annual reports on Form 10-K indicating that we are a shell company.

To the extent that we would be required to comply with additional disclosure because we are a shell company, we might be delayed in acquiring non-furniture assets that would cause us to cease being a shell company. In addition, under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, a holder of restricted securities of a “shell company” is not allowed to resell their securities in reliance upon Rule 144. The inability to utilize registration statements on Forms S-8 and S-3 would likely increase our costs to register securities in the future. Additionally, the loss of the use of Rule 144 and Form S-8 might make the offering and sale of our securities to employees, directors and others under compensatory arrangements more expensive and less attractive to recipients.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and we cannot assure you that additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies will not occur in the future. If our internal control over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, we may not be able to sustain sales, earningsaccurately report our financial results, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and liquidity levels duemay lead to economic downturns.a decline in our stock price.

 

The furniture industry historically has been cyclicalManagement is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in natureinternal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal controls over stock-based compensation expense was identified by management during the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to the design and has fluctuatedeffectiveness of internal controls related to the accounting with economic cycles.  During economic downturns,respect to modifications of share-based payment awards. If our remediation efforts for this material weakness is not successful, or if other material weaknesses arise in the furniture industry tendsfuture, our ability to experience longer periods of recessionproperly manage the business may be impaired and greater declines than the general economy. We believe that the industry is significantly influenced by economic conditions generally and particularly by housing activity, consumer confidence, the level of personal discretionary spending, demographics and credit availability.  As awe may be unable to accurately report our financial results. This could result a worsening of current conditions could lower our sales and earnings and impact our liquidity.

Business failures, or the loss, of large customersin previously reported financial results being restated, which could result in a decreaseloss of investor confidence and may lead to a decline in our future sales and earnings.stock price.

 

Although weOur executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders have no single customer representingsignificant voting power and may vote their shares in a manner that is not in the best interest of other stockholders.

Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders control approximately 36% of the voting power represented by our outstanding common stock. If these stockholders act together, they may be able to exert significant control over our management and affairs requiring stockholder approval, such as the election of directors or morethe dissolution of the company. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our total annual sales, the possibilitycommon stock. This concentration of business failures, or the loss oflarge customers could result in a decrease of our future sales and earnings.  Lost sales may be difficult to replace and any amounts owed to us may become uncollectible.

Failure to anticipate or respond to changes in customer tastes, fashions and perceived values in a timely manner could result in a decrease in our sales and earnings.

Residential furniture is a fashion business based upon products styled for a changing marketplace and is sometimes subject to changing consumer trends and tastes.  If we are unable to predict or respond to changes in these trends and tastes in a timely manner, we may lose sales and have to sell excess inventory at reduced prices.  This could lower our sales and earnings.

7


Table of Contents

Weownership may not be able to sustain current sales and earnings due toin the actions and strengthbest interests of all our competitors.stockholders.

 

The furniture industryOur management is very competitivecurrently and fragmented.  We competewill be employed on a part-time basis for the foreseeable future and will have outside business interests that will require their time and attention and may interfere with a hosttheir ability to devote all of varyingtheir time to our business, models within the industry including but not limited to former manufacturers who have adopted a strictly pass-through model from overseas vendor to wholesale customers: national lifestyle retailers who sell directly to the retail consumer through an omni-channel distribution and marketing model; overseas vendors who sell directly to wholesale customers. Some competitors have greater financial resources and often offer extensively advertised, highly promoted products.  As a result, we are continually subject to the risk of losing market share, which may lower our sales and earnings.

Our liquidity could be negatively impacted by the potential instability of Genworth Life Insurance Company.

We currently have available $22.3 million of net cash surrender value in corporate-owned life insurance policies with Genworth Life Insurance Company.  If the financial stability of Genworth Life Insurance Company was to deteriorate to a point that insolvency was likely, our access to these funds may be limited or eliminated.  Although management monitors the financial stability of Genworth Life Insurance Company on a regular basis, insolvency could occur and, as a result, impact our liquidity.  Genworth Life Insurance Company is a subsidiary of Genworth Financial, Inc., which recently reported a Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015 operating loss in its U.S. Life Insurance segment.  The company also announced that it was suspending traditional life and fixed annuity sales.  After this announcement, Genworth Life Insurance Company’s ratings from the following rating agencies were downgraded to those set forth below:

·   A.M. Best: B++ (Good)

·   Standard & Poor’s: BB (Marginal)

·   Moody’s: Ba1 (Questionable)

Our business and operations would be adversely impacted in the event of a failure or interruption of our information technology infrastructure. 

The proper functioning of our information technology infrastructure is critical to the efficient operation and management of our business. If our information technology systems fail or are interrupted, our operations may be adversely affected and operating results could be harmed. Our information technology systems, and those of third parties providing service to us, may also be vulnerable to damage or disruption caused by circumstances beyond our control. These include catastrophic events, power anomalies or outages, natural disasters, computer system or network failures, viruses or malware, physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized access and cyber-attacks. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar challenges with our information technology infrastructure, or disruptions or challenges relating to the transition to new processes, systems or providers, could have a material adverse effect on the operation ofaffect our business and our results of operations.

 

We depend on key personnel and couldSince our business will be affected by the loss of their services.

The successlimited until we find a suitable non-furniture assets for acquisition, our only employees consist of our two executive officers, who will be employed for the foreseeable future on a part-time basis and will have outside business depends uponinterests that could require substantial time and attention. Our executive officers are associated with Hale Partnership Capital Management LLC and devote significant time to its affairs. We cannot accurately predict the servicesamount of certain senior executives.time and attention that will be required of our officers to perform their ongoing duties related to outside business interests. The lossinability of any such person or other key personnelour officers to devote sufficient time to managing our business could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Future cost of compliance with environmental, safety and health regulations could reduce our earnings. 

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the areas of safety, health and environmental protection.  The timing and ultimate magnitude of costs for compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations are difficult to predict and could reduce our earnings. 

 

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

8


Table of Contents

 

Item 2.       Properties

 

Set forth below is certain information with respect to our principal properties.properties until March 2, 2018. We believe that all these properties arewere well maintained and in good condition. A majority of our distribution facilities arewere equipped with automatic sprinkler systems and modern fire protection equipment, which we believe arewere adequate. All facilities set forth below arewere active and operational.

Approximate

Owned

Facility Size

or

Location

Primary Use

(Square Feet)

Leased

Martinsville, VA

Distribution

300,000

300,000Leased

Martinsville, VA

Distribution

140,000

Leased

High Point, NC

Showroom/Showroom/Office

56,000

Leased

Las Vegas, NV

Showroom

11,500

Leased

Vietnam

Distribution

574,500,000(1)

Leased

Lexington,Mocksville, NC

Distribution

452,700,000(1)

Leased

(1)    Estimated space as of December 31, 2015.

(1)

Estimated space as of December 31, 2017. Leased footage is a function of amount of product held with no minimum space commitments.

Effective March 2, 2018, we moved our corporate headquarters to Charlotte, North Carolina where we lease approximately 1,000 square feet of office space.


Item 3.Legal Proceedings

 

In the normal course of business, we are involved in claims and lawsuits none of which currently, in our opinion, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On February 5, 2018, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina against us, our directors and certain former directors in connection with the Asset Sale. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that we violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by omitting certain material information from the proxy statement relating to the Asset Sale. The complaint sought, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Asset Sale until disclosure of the material information allegedly omitted from the proxy statement, rescission of the Asset Purchase Agreement to the extent already implemented, and the award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees and certain other damages. While we believed the claims were without merit, we determined to provide additional disclosure in a supplement to the proxy statement in order to alleviate the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent with litigation.  We reached an agreement with the plaintiff regarding our additional disclosures and the lawsuit was dismissed on March 12, 2018. 

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not Applicable.

 

Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Our executive officers who are elected annually and their ages as of January 1, 20162018 are as follows:

 

Name

Age

Position

Glenn PrillamanSteven A. Hale II

34     

44

President andChairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Anita W. Wimmer

52

54     

Vice President - Finance/Corporate Controller

 

Effective December 7, 2017, Glenn Prillaman has beenresigned as President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2010.  Mr. Prillaman was Presidentof the Company and Chief Operating Officer from August 2009 until February 2010.  He was our Executive Vice President – Marketing and Sales from September 2008 until August 2009.  He held the position of Senior Vice President – Marketing and Sales from September 2006 until September 2008 and was our Senior Vice President – Marketing/Sales – Young America® from August 2003 to September 2006.  Mr. Prillaman held various management positions in product development from June 1999 to August 2003.  Prior to this Mr. Prillaman represented the company as a sales agent from 1993member of the Board pursuant to 1996.a separation agreement entered into by Mr. Prillaman with the Company. The Board appointed Matthew W. Smith to serve as interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company until his successor was appointed and qualified or until his earlier removal or resignation. Mr. Smith serves as a managing director of The Finley Group, Inc., which provides advisory services to corporate executives, boards of directors, financial institutions, lawyers and private equity sponsors. In connection with the Asset Sale, Mr. Smith resigned as Interim Chief Executive Officer effective March 2, 2018. Effective as of March 2, 2018, Steven A. Hale II, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, was elected Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

 

Steven A. Hale II is the founder of Hale Partnership Capital Management, LLC, an asset management firm that serves as the investment manager to certain privately held investment partnerships. Mr. Hale has held his position since 2010. From 2007 to 2010, prior to founding Hale Partnership Capital Management, LLC, Mr. Hale was an associate director with Babson Capital Management, LLC, an asset management firm, where he had responsibility for coverage of distressed debt investments across a variety of industries. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Hale was a leveraged finance analyst with Banc of America Securities. Mr. Hale has served as a director of the Company since February 2017 and as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since November 2017.

Anita W. WimmerWimmerhas been principal financial and accounting officer and Secretary since August 2014 and has also served as Vice President – Finance/Corporate Controller since April 2014 and Assistant Secretary from April 1999 until August 2014. She served as Vice President – Corporate Controller from April 2012 until April 2014 and as Vice President – Controller and Treasurer from April 2005 until April 2012. Prior to this, Mrs. Wimmer held various financial positions since her employment with Stanley began in March 1993.

 

9

PART II

 


Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Table of Contents

Market Prices

 

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Prices

OurBefore March 15, 2018, our common stock is quotedwas traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “STLY”.STLY  As of March 15, 2018, our common stock was delisted from Nasdaq following the Asset Sale. On March 20, 2018, our common stock began trading in the over-the-counter market on the OTCQB under the symbol “STLY”The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices per share, for the periods indicated, as reported by Nasdaq.
Nasdaq.

 

  

2017

  

2016

 
                 
  

High

  

Low

  

High

  

Low

 

First Quarter

 $1.09  $0.76  $2.88  $2.25 

Second Quarter

  1.34   0.76   2.90   2.42 

Third Quarter

  1.39   1.04   3.65   1.66 

Fourth Quarter

  1.27   0.80   1.99   0.86 

2015

2014

High

Low

High

Low

First Quarter

$

3.64

 

$

2.71

 

$

3.92

 

$

2.70

Second Quarter

3.39

2.62

3.09

2.51

Third Quarter

 

3.31

 

 

2.75

 

 

3.00

 

 

2.27

Fourth Quarter

3.04

2.60

3.23

2.52


 

As of February 10, 2016,5, 2018, we have approximately 1,6751,799 beneficial stockholders. In August 2016, our Board authorized the payment of two special dividends totaling up to $1.50 per share. The initial special dividend of $1.25 per share was paid on August 19, 2016. The second special dividend of $0.25 per share was paid on November 18, 2016. Until we terminated our revolving credit facility in connection with the Asset Sale, it prohibited the declaration or payment of additional dividends, other than those payable on restricted stock awards.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

The following table summarizes the repurchases of our equity securities during the 12-month period ended December 31, 2015:2017:

Period

 

Total

Number of

Shares

Purchased

  

Average

Price

Paid per

Share

  

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased as

Part of

Publicly

Announced

Plans or

Programs(1)

  

Approximate

Dollar Value

of Shares

that May Yet

be Purchased

under the

Plans or

Programs(1)

 

January 1 to April 1, 2017

  -       -   2,969,271 

April 2 to July 1, 2017

  -       -   2,969,271 

July 2 to September 30, 2017

  -       -   2,969,271 

Nine months ended September 30, 2017

  -       -     

October 1 to November 4, 2017

  -       -   2,969,271 

November 5 to December 2, 2017

  -       -   2,969,271 

December 3 to December 31, 2017

  163,214(2)  0.83   -   2,969,271 

Three months ended December 31, 2017

  163,214(2)      -     

Twelve months ended December 31, 2017

  163,214(2)            

(1)


In July 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $5.0 million of our common stock. These repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at prices the company deems appropriate.

(2)

Represents shares tendered by recipient of restricted stock awards on December 7, 2017 to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock.

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid per Share

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)

Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs(1)

September 27 to October 31, 2015

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

3,981,271

November 1 to November 28, 2015

-

-

3,981,271

November 29 to December 31, 2015

 

4,622(2)

 

2.81

 

-

 

3,981,271

Three months ended December 31, 2015

4,622(2)

-

(1)

In July 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $5.0 million of our common stock.  We have approximately $4.0 million remaining under this authorization, but have not repurchased any common stock under this authorization since 2013.  The board of directors has authorized the resumption of repurchases.  These repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at prices the company deems appropriate.

(2)

Shares tendered by recipients of restricted stock awards to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015:2017:

 

Number of shares

Weighted-average

Number of shares

to be issued upon

exercise price

remaining available

exercise of

of outstanding

for future issuance

outstanding options,

options, warrants

under equity

warrants and rights

and rights

compensation plans

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

1,166,192

 

$5.93

 

1,713,346

10



Table of Contents

  

Number of shares

  

Weighted-average

  

Number of shares

 
  

to be issued upon

  

exercise price

  

remaining available

 
  

exercise of

  

of outstanding

  

for future issuance

 
  

outstanding options,

  

options, warrants

  

under equity

 
  

warrants and rights

  

and rights

  

compensation plans

 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

  826,582  $5.35   1,384,694 

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

(in thousands, except per share data)

Income Statement Data:

Net sales  

$

57,364

 

$

60,623

 

$

58,559

 

$

61,260

 

$

58,366

Cost of sales (1) 

 

43,679

 

48,610

 

45,959

 

47,474

 

44,960

Gross profit 

 

13,685

 

 

12,013

 

 

12,600

 

 

13,786

 

 

13,406

Selling, general and administrative expenses (2)

 

12,661

 

14,882

 

16,277

 

15,552

 

15,447

Operating income (loss)

 

1,024

 

 

(2,869)

 

 

(3,677)

 

 

(1,766)

 

 

(2,041)

Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net

5,308

-

-

39,349

3,973

Other income (expense), net

 

42

 

 

(2,174)

 

 

67

 

 

79

 

 

112

Interest expense, net

 

947

 

2,884

 

2,669

 

2,320

 

2,330

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

5,427

 

 

(7,927)

 

 

(6,279)

 

 

35,342

 

 

(286)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

76

 

(39)

 

(157)

 

645

 

1

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$

5,351

 

$

(7,888)

 

$

(6,122)

 

$

34,697

 

$

(287)

Basic Earnings (loss) Per Share: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$

.37

$

(.56)

$

(.43)

$

2.42

$

(.02)

Weighted average shares

 

14,273

 

 

14,197

 

 

14,147

 

 

14,328

 

 

14,345

Diluted Earnings (loss) Per Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$

.37

$

(.56)

$

(.43)

$

2.40

$

(.02)

Weighted average shares

 

14,542

 

 

14,197

 

 

14,147

 

 

14,484

 

 

14,345

Balance Sheet and Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, restricted cash and short-term investments

$

7,160

$

6,774

$

18,955

$

37,667

$

17,287

Inventories

$

20,934

 

$

24,216

 

$

23,901

 

$

26,207

 

$

23,592

Total assets (3)

$

63,146

$

59,641

$

94,786

$

109,754

$

80,089

Stockholders’ equity

$

47,652

 

$

40,979

 

$

70,990

 

$

82,405

 

$

53,088

Item 6.      (1)    Included in cost of sales in 2014 and in 2012 are restructuring and related charges of $354 and $474, respectively, for lease commitments on warehousing space in the Stanleytown facility no longer being utilized.  Included in cost of sales in 2011 are restructuring and related charges of $416 for the conversion of the Stanleytown manufacturing facility to a warehouse and distribution center, the sale of the Martinsville, Virginia facility and other restructuring related cost. 

(2)    Included in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2013 is $770 of restructuring and related charges for the consolidation of corporate offices.

(3)    AdoptingSelected Financial Accounting Standards Board ASU 2015-17 related to the balance sheet classification of all deferred tax assets and liabilities as long-term resulted in a prior period reclassification resulting in reductions in total assets of $66, $699, $962 and $519, for the periods ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Because we maintain a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, the reclassification of all items to long-term results in our having no deferred tax amounts on our balance sheet.Data

 

11Not required to be provided by a smaller reporting company.

 



Table of Contents


Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

We have takenAt the end of the first quarter of 2016, we had cash of $25.9 million on our balance sheet as a numberresult of strategic steps over the last several years to reposition our company.  We have closed domestic manufacturing facilitiessurrender of corporate-owned life insurance policies and moved to an overseas sourcing model.  We discontinued an un-profitable product line, and we are in the process of launching a new one.  We have established a strategic overseas manufacturing alliance with a reputable cost efficient producer in Vietnam, Starwood Manufacturing VN Corporation.  We implemented a new enterprise operating system, opened new trade showrooms and consolidated corporate offices. In addition, we have taken strategic steps to align our cost structure in response to lower sales volume related to these changes.  We believe each of these initiatives was necessary, and each is now contributing to progress in our company’s operating results as we showed our first profitable year since 2008, excluding proceedspreviously received fromdistributions under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA)Act.  In January 2016, our Board established a special committee to consider potential strategic and restructuring charges.

capital allocation opportunities. In 2014,May 2016, our Board, in connection with the committee’s consideration of potential strategic and capital allocation opportunities, met with prospective financial advisors and in June 2016 engaged Stephens Inc. (Stephens) as its financial advisor in connection with the consideration of potential strategic and capital allocation opportunities. On July 26, 2016, our Board met with representatives of Stephens to discuss Stephens’ views on potential strategic and capital allocation opportunities and their recommendation that our Board consider a special dividend of surplus cash to our stockholders and pursue a potential sale of our company while leaving open a standalone strategy if our future results of operations indicated a superior return to stockholders than selling the business. In August 2016, we decidedannounced our Board’s intention to discontinue our domestically manufactured nurseryissue to stockholders two special dividends totaling $1.50 per share ($22.1 million in the aggregate) and youth line, Young America.  Revenues for this product line remained belowrepresenting cash in excess of the levelcash needed to reach profitability as a domestic manufacturer, therefore we concluded duringexecute our business plan.  The first dividend payment was made in August 2016 and the second quarter of 2014 that the timeframe neededpayment was made in October 2016 after we obtained a credit facility to assure sustainable profitability was longer than we felt was economically justified.  The loss from discontinued operations for 2014 was $22.0 million and consisted mostly of asset impairment charges, costs of finalizing operations and severance and other termination costs. Final discontinued operations expenses of $11,000 were incurredfund fluctuations in 2015.working capital.

 

In early 2016,During 2017, sales remained relatively stable, increasing approximately 1% as compared to prior year. During the first three quarters, we establishedcontinued to sustain a strategic manufacturing alliance withperiod of poor service caused by past sourcing issues. However, in the third quarter 2017, our inventory availability position which previously hindered demand for our products were drastically improved, which resulted in increased sales during both the third and fourth quarters of 2017. As of September 30, 2017, we had negative cash flow from operations of $3.0 million, which was a reputable, low cost producerdirect result of abnormally high shipments over the last few months from our overseas suppliers to improve our inventory stock availability position. As a result, we utilized our revolving credit facility from time to time and, in Vietnam, Starwood Manufacturing VN Corporation.  The strategic alliance is designedNovember 2017, we obtained a waiver from our lender to eliminate the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement which removed any financial covenant requirements and allowed us to borrow on the revolver through October 2018. During the fourth quarter 2017, management has continued to reduce and/or delay operating expenses and utilize our overall sourcing costs, maintain our high product quality standards and improve stockline of credit availability as lead times are reduced. This strategic alliance allowsnecessary in order to meet obligations as they become due.

On March 2, 2018, we sold substantially all of our assets to Churchill Downs LLC, pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2017, as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated January 22, 2017. As consideration for the utilizationAsset Sale, Buyer paid a purchase price consisting of cash in the amount of approximately $10.8 million (of which approximately $1.3 million was used to pay the outstanding amount under our credit agreement), a stand-alone, dedicated manufacturing facilitysubordinated promissory note in which we have the abilityprincipal amount of approximately $7.4 million, and a 5% equity interest in Buyer’s post-closing ultimate parent company, Churchill Downs Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands business company. Buyer also assumed substantially all of our liabilities.

We anticipate that our expenses relating to engineer our designs specifically for the efficiency of this factory, schedule and supervise production to satisfy our specific customers’ demands and provide quality assurance.  We maintain exclusive rights to utilizeAsset Sale following the stand-alone facility for as long as we meet certain volume goals for the facility’s capacity utilization, yet we are not obligated to utilize the capacityclosing of the facility should certain market-driven and/or competitive factors resultAsset Sale will be approximately $2.8 million, which includes financial advisory fees, legal fees, amounts owed under our Change in another alternative being preferable.Control Protection Agreement with our principal financial officer, amounts owed to our former chief executive officer under the terms of his separation agreement, and other fees and expenses.

 

In January 2015,As previously announced, we announceddo not intend to liquidate following the closing of the Asset Sale.   We also previously indicated our re-entry intoboard of directors would evaluate alternatives for use of the nurserycash consideration, which were expected to include using a portion of the cash to either repurchase our common stock or pay a special dividend to stockholders and youth product category withalso using a portion of the launch of a new brand, Stone & Leigh.  New designs were introducedcash to the trade at the High Point Market in April 2015.  Our new strategic manufacturing alliance, our experience developing and marketing nursery and youth product, our relationships with wholesale customers within the nursery and youth furniture segment and the minimal investment required for the launch shouldacquire non-furniture related assets that will allow us to re-enter this partpotentially derive a benefit from its net operating loss carryforwards. Our board of directors has determined not to pay a special dividend, but to use our existing authorization for stock repurchases to repurchase our common stock from time to time in the open market, successfully.  This product line began shipping in late 2015privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at prices we deem appropriate. Our board anticipates retaining the remaining cash for use in acquiring non-furniture related assets and should beto fund operating expenses until an acquisition.  Our board is also considering a sourcerights offering of growthour common stock to existing stockholders to raise additional cash for acquisition purposes which could provide us greater resources and flexibility in 2016.

In addition to the consumer marketing efforts to launch our new Stone & Leigh youth and nursery furniture brand, we are beginning new consumer advertising and wholesale customer support plans to increase revenue and more effectively reach target consumers of the Stanley adult product lines.  These efforts, along with more valuable product supplied through our strategic manufacturing alliance overseas should produce growth for the adult furniture product lines under the Stanley and Coastal Living® brands.acquiring non-furniture assets.

 

 

12


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain items included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

  

For the Years Ended

 
  

December 31,

 
  

2017

  

2016

 

Net sales

  100.0%  100.0%

Cost of sales

  89.3   81.1 

Gross profit

  10.7   18.9 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  28.9   31.4 

Operating loss

  (18.2)  (12.5)

CDSOA income, net

  1.0   2.4 

Other income, net

  .1   .1 

Interest expense, net

  -   .2 

Loss before income taxes

  (17.1)  (10.2)

Income tax expense

  (.1)  1.6 

Net loss

  (17.1)%  (11.8)%


For the Years Ended

December 31,

 

2015

2014

Net sales

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

Cost of sales

76.1

 

80.2

 

Gross profit 

23.9

 

 

19.8

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

22.1

 

24.5

 

Operating income (loss)

1.8

 

 

(4.7)

 

CDSOA income, net

9.2

-

Other income (expense), net

.1

 

 

(3.6)

 

Interest expense, net

1.7

 

4.8

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

9.4

 

 

(13.1)

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

.1

 

(.1)

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

9.3

 

 

(13.0)

 

Loss from discontinued operations

-

 

(36.3)

 

Net income (loss)

9.3

%

 

(49.3)

%

 

20120157 Compared to 20142016

 

Net sales decreased $3.3increased $0.6 million, or 5.4%1.4%, in 20152017 compared to 2014, primarily due to lower2016. An 8.2% increase in unit volume partiallywas mostly offset by highera decrease in average selling prices.  Increase in unit volume and decrease in average selling prices resulting from less discounting and a modest price increase that went into effect in June of 2015.  Lower unit volume was primarily athe result of delaysa large order on obsolete goods shipped to a buyer during the fourth quarter.  The Board, along with the Buyer in overseas manufacturingthe Asset Sale, decided that they would like to sell as much obsolete inventory as possible before the closing of new introductions as we beganthe Asset Sale, which had been previously written down to net realizable value.  The orders consisted of approximately 12,000 units with a strategic manufacturing alliance overseas in a newly constructed facility.  net sales value of $1.2 million.  Excluding this order, net sales would have decreased 1.3% for the year.

  

Gross profit as a percentagedecreased to $4.8 million, or 10.7% of net sales, increased to 23.9% in 2015 from 19.8% in 2014.  The improved gross profit margin in 2015 was driven by lower operation support costs and lower sales discounts, partially offset by the impact of lower sales volumes.  Prior year gross profit included $354,000,$8.4 million, or 0.6%18.9% of net sales, in restructuring charges2016. The decline in gross margin also resulted primarily from the large sale of obsolete goods mentioned above and additional inventory write-downs for future lease commitments on anewer product not retailing. Excluding these items, our gross margin would have been 17.8%. Margins were also negatively impacted by increased warehouse facility that was no longer utilized.   and shipping cost related to the increased volume of product received into our warehouses and quality issues related to finishing.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses for 20152017 were $12.7$13.0 million, or 22.1%28.9% of net sales, compared to $14.9$14.0 million, or 24.5%31.4% of net sales, in 2014.2016.  The lower percentage and lower expense were the result of reducing our expenditures as we aligned our cost structure to support lower volume levels and a new operational support model overseas.  These reductions were not in place until the second half of 2014.  In addition, lower sales contributedCost-cutting measures to lower commissions.salaries and benefits and reduced advertising and marketing costs were partially offset by an increase in one-time charges in legal and professional expenses related to the Asset Purchase Agreement and compensation costs related to a separation agreement with our former chief executive officer.

 

As a result of the above, our operating incomeloss was $1.0$8.2 million, or 1.8%(18.2%) of net sales, in 20152017, compared to an operating loss of $2.9$5.6 million, or (4.7%(12.5%) of net sales, in 2014.2016.

 

During the current year we received $5.3$0.4 million in funds under the CDSOA.CDSOA compared to $1.1 million in 2016.

 

IThe charge in other income andnterest expense for 2017 decreased $98,000 from the comparable 2016 period. Interest expense in the prior year included $2.5 million representing the impairment of prepaid legal services funded by settlements collected by the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee of Legal Trade (CLT) from 2010 through 2014 in connection with wooden bedroom furniture imported from China.  Partially offsetting this charge was the reversal of tariff accruals on imported bedroom furniture that U.S. Customs liquidated in the prior year without assessing any additional liability.

Interest expense is composed of interest on loans against the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies from aused to fund our legacy deferred compensation plan. The decrease in interest expense was due to paying off these outstanding loans with excess cash when we liquidated our corporate-owned life insurance policies in 2015the first quarter of 2016.

Our 2017 effective tax rate was 0.5%, compared to 2014with negative 15.8% in 2016. As indicated above, we surrendered our corporate-owned life insurance policies during the first quarter of 2016, which resulted in taxable income. The premiums paid and the growth in surrender value of these policies were excludable from taxable income over the life of these polices when held until death of the covered lives, but this growth, net of premiums paid, became taxable when we surrendered the policies. The aggregate impact of the surrender of these policies in the first quarter of 2016 was $24.0 million in taxable income. Most of this income was offset by net operating loss carryforwards. The income tax expense associated with the surrender of the corporate-owned life insurance policies was largely recognized during the first quarter of 2016. The income tax expense recognized was the result of paying down $13.7 million in outstanding loans in November 2014 and an additional $5.5 million in 2015.  Subsequent to year end, we used $2.5 million to pay down loans and accrued interest to lower our outstanding loan balance to $3.1 million and reduce interest expense to approximately $410,000 annually.

13


Table of Contents

Our 2015 effective tax rate expense was 1.4% and was primarily generated from the federal alternative minimum tax.tax liability associated with the surrender of the corporate-owned life insurance policies and state income taxes. The alternative minimum tax limits our ability to offset all of our income with net operating loss carryforwards.  The effective

We have substantially completed our provisional analysis of the income tax rate in 2014 was essentially zero since we establishedeffects of the Tax Act and recorded a valuation allowance for our deferred taxes.    The benefitreasonable estimate of such effects. However, the SEC staff issued guidance regarding application of Financial Accounting Standards Board income tax guidance in the prior yearreporting period that includes December 22, 2017 – the date on which the Tax Act was primarily fromsigned into law – to address situations when a company does not have the releasenecessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of reserves due to the lapse of statute of limitations.

During 2014, we ceased production of our Young America product line and closed our manufacturing operation in Robbinsville, North Carolina.  As a result, we recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $11,000 and $22.0 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.  These losses consisted mostly of asset impairment charges, costs of finalizing operations and severance and other termination costs.  No further expensesTax Act. We have estimated the tax impacts related to the discontinued operations are expected. impact to deferred tax assets and liabilities and included these amounts in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, on a provisional basis. In this regard, the Tax Act repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax, or AMT, regime, including claiming a refund and full realization of remaining AMT credits. We have not been able to make a reasonable estimate with respect to the realization of existing AMT credit carryforwards, and accordingly, continue to apply the income tax-related accounting guidance that was in effect immediately prior to the enactment of the Tax Act. In order for us to complete the income tax effects of the Tax Act on the existing AMT deferred tax asset, we need to further analyze the nature, validity, and recoverability of the AMT-related deferred tax credit carryforwards prior to recording the underlying appropriate tax benefit. Accordingly, the ultimate impact related to the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially, due to, among other things, completing our analysis of the realization of available AMT credit refunds, further refinement of our calculations, changes in interpretations and assumptions that we made, additional guidance that may be issued by the U.S. Government, and actions and related accounting policy decisions that we may take as a result of the Tax Act. We expect this analysis to be complete when our 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.

 

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Sources of liquidity include cash on hand, and cash generated from operations and cash surrender value of corporate owned life insurance policies.operations. While we believe that our business strategy will be successful, we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate impact on our revenues, operating costs and cash flowsflow from operations.  We expect cash on hand to be adequate for ongoing operational expenditures over the next twelve months, as a direct result of the cash proceeds received from the asset sale.   As of December 31, 2017, and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.  Atyear ended December 31, 20152017, we had $6.5approximately $1.0 million in available cash, $663,000a net loss of $7.7 million and negative cash flow from operations of $2.7 million. As a result, during the fourth quarter we utilized our revolving credit facility from time to time. In November 2017, we obtained a waiver from our lender to eliminate the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement which removed any financial covenant requirements through October 2018.

On December 7, 2017, we entered into a letter of consent with our lender to waive any events of default relating to our entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement. The lender also agreed to consent to Matthew Smith’s replacement of Glenn Prillaman as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on an interim basis. Pursuant to the terms of the consent above and an additional consent received on February 28, 2018, our borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility was limited to $2 million (including the amount of any letters of credit) until March 15, 2018. On March 2, 2018, in restricted cashconnection with the Asset Sale discussed in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we terminated this credit agreement and $22.3 million available in cash surrender value on corporate-owned life insurance policies.the related security agreement.


 

Working capital, excluding cash on hand and restricted cash, and net assets of discontinued operations, decreased slightly during 20152017 to $21.2$14.2 million from $21.4$18.8 million at December 31, 2014.2016.

Cash used by operating activities was $2.7 million in 2017 and $2.6 million in 2016. The slight decreasenet amount of cash received from customers and cash paid to suppliers and employees in 2017 was primarily the resultconsistent with 2016.

Cash provided by investing activities in 2017 included proceeds from sale of a decrease in inventory balances as we attempt to properly align our inventory levels with demand.  Mostly offsetting this decrease in inventory was an increase in receivablesproperty, plant and a decrease in payablesequipment and other accruals.  Higher accounts receivable balances resulted from an increase in shipping volume at the end of the period as we began shipping new introductions delayed by the implementation of our new strategic manufacturing alliance.   The lower accounts payable balance is driven by lower in-transit inventory from our vendors compared to prior year end and other accruals declined predominantly from the reduction in deferred revenuerestricted cash, partially offset by purchases of property, plant and restructuring accruals. 

equipment. Cash provided by operationsgenerated from investing activities in 2016 was $4.6 million in 2015 and cash used by operations was $11.2 million in 2014.  The cash provided by operations in 2015 was from the receipt of $5.3due to $28.1 million in proceeds from the CDSOA, partially offset by $988,000surrender of interest paid on loans against corporate-owned life insurance policies.  The cash used by operations in 2014 was the result of operating losses, decrease in other accruals and accounts payable and the additional accrued interest paid at the time we paid down $13.7 million of life insurance policy loans.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $516,000 in 2015 compared to $10.5 million in 2014.  In both 2015 and 2014, restricted cash decreased due to a reduction in outstanding letters of credit required by our insurance company for potential workers compensation claims.  During 2014, cash was provided from the maturity of $10.0 million of short-term investments.  No major expenditures are planned for in the coming year.

 

Net cash used by financing activities in 2017 was $619,000 compared to $27.8 million in 2016. We paid $483,000 in dividends on restricted stock that vested during 2017. During the prior year we used $21.3 million for a special dividend, $5.5 million in 2015 compared to $11.0 million in 2014.  In 2015 and 2014, we paid down $5.5 million and $13.7 million, respectively in certain corporate-owned life insurance policies used to fund our obligations under our legacy deferred compensation plan.   We decided to use excess cash to pay down these loans to lower our interest expense, while continuing to maintain liquidity with unrestricted access tooff the cash surrender value of these corporate-ownedremaining outstanding life insurance policies.  In 2014, proceeds from these insurance policy loans provided cash of $2.7 million.  In addition, $13,000 was used for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted awards in 2015.

Several factors influencedconjunction with our decision to begin paying down the policy loans against corporate-owned life insurance policies, including:

1.     The increase of our net operating loss carryforwards in 2014, mostly due to the discontinuation of our Young America product line, impaired our ability to realize the tax benefits of the program until we exhaust these loss carryforwards;

2.     With the elimination of approximately 40% of our revenues in 2014, the appreciation of the cash surrender values with borrowings against them was becoming a disproportionate amount of operating income.

3.     The 4% growth rate on the non-borrowed cash surrender value of these insurance policies compared to rates currently available for alternative investments.

As of December 31, 2015, we had $5.6 million in policy loans and accrued interest. 

14


Table of Contents

We will continue to review the overall impact of the deferred compensation plan and the corporate-owned life insurance policies on the financial statements along with risks related to the plan and the insurance policies.  The gross cash surrender value of these corporate-owned life insurance policies at December 31, 2015 was $27.8 million.  The overall stability and solvency$1.0 million for the repurchase and retirement of Genworth Life Insurance Company is reviewed regularly by the Board400,000 shares of Directors and management. our common stock.

 

Subsequent to year end, we made the decision to liquidate two of the outstanding corporate-owned life insurance policies with cash surrender value of $2.6 million.  We used $2.5 million of the proceeds to pay down outstanding loans and accrued interest, leaving our outstanding loan balance at $3.1 million.  If we decided to pay down this remaining balance our operating income would include approximately $500,000 annually in income from the growth in cash surrender value, net of related expenses, and interest expense would decrease to zero.

Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (“CDSOA”)

 

The CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the United States through September 30, 2007 to eligible domestic producers that supported a successful antidumping petition (“Supporting Producers”) for wooden bedroom furniture imported from China. Antidumping duties for merchandise entering the U.S. after September 30, 2007 have remained with the U.S. Treasury.

 

Certain manufacturers who did not support the antidumping petition (“Non-Supporting Producers”) filed actions in the United States Court of International Trade, challenging the CDSOA’s “support requirement” and seeking to share in the distributions.  As a result, Customs held back a portion of those distributions (the “Holdback”) pending resolution of the Non-Supporting Producers’ claims.  The Court of International Trade dismissed all of the actions of the Non-Supporting Producers, who appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Customs advised that it expected to distribute the Holdback to the Supporting Producers after March 9, 2012.  The Non-Supporting Producers sought injunctions first from the Court of International Trade and, when those efforts were unsuccessful, from the Federal Circuit directing Customs to retain the Holdback until the Non-Supporting Producers’ appeals were resolved.

On March 5, 2012, the Federal Circuit denied the motions for injunction, “without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of these cases.”  As a result, we received a CDSOA distribution of $39.9 million in April 2012. On August 19, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued a decision affirming the dismissal of the claims of two of the four Non-Supporting Producers. On January 3, 2014, the Federal Circuit denied those Non-Supporting Producers’ petitions for rehearing en banc.  On May 2, 2014, these Non-Supporting Producers filed a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking review by the United States Supreme Court.   On October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court denied two of three of the Non-Supporting Producers’ petitions for certiorari review, and on December 15, 2014, the Supreme Court denied the third petition for review.  Accordingly, Customs should not seek or be entitled to obtain a return of our CDSOA distribution received in April 2012.

In November 2012, December 2013,2016 and November 20142017, Customs disclosed that it withheld $3.0distributed $3.3 million $6.4 million, and $5.7 million respectively in each of those years, in funds related to the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from China that was otherwise available for distribution until the amounts at issue in the pending litigation had been resolved.  In March 2015, following the conclusion of all appeals, Customs began distributing the withheld funds to the Supporting Producers.  Our allocated share of the distributed 2012, 2013, and 2014 withheld funds totaled $4.8 million, which we received during late March and early April 2015. 

In November 2014, Customs also announced that 2014 and 2015 CDSOA distributions were subject to sequestration under the Budget Control Act at the rate of 7.2 percent and 7.3 percent, respectively.  On March 17, 2015, however, the government concluded that the amounts sequestered during Fiscal Year 2014 and Fiscal Year 2015 would become available in the subsequent fiscal year.  Our share of the 2014 sequestered funds, totaling $147,000, was received in April 2015 and no funds were sequestered in 2015. 

15


In November 2015, Customs distributed $1.2 million in collected duties that were available for distribution in 2015.2016 and 2017, respectively. Our portion of this distribution was $412,000,these distributions were $1.1 million and 433,000, respectively, representing 33.6%33.5% of the balance available for distribution.  According to Customs, asdistribution in 2016 and 37.1% of the balance available for distribution in 2017. As of October 1, 2015,2017, Customs reported that approximately $2.6 million$233,000 in duties had been secured by cash deposits and bondsor other security paid at the time of import on unliquidatedsubject entries of wooden bedroom furniture that are subject to the CDSOA, and this amount isremains in a clearing account balance, which potentially may become available for distribution under the CDSOA to eligible domestic manufacturers in connection with the case involving bedroom furniture imported from China. The amount ultimately distributed willfinal amounts available for distribution may be impacted by appeals fromhigher or lower than the annual administrative review processpreliminary amounts reported in the clearing account due to liquidations, reliquidations, protests, and importers’ actions concerning the amount of duties owed with respect to specific entries, which can retroactively increase or decrease the actual duties owed on entries secured by cash deposits and bonds.other events affecting entries. Assuming that our percentage allocation in the future years is the same as it was for the 20152017 distribution (approximately 33.6%37.1% of the funds distributed) and the $2.6 million collected by the government as of October 1, 2015 does not change as a result of the annual administrative review process or otherwise,, we could receive approximately $860,000$87,000 in CDSOA funds.funds at some point in the future.

 

Due to the uncertainty of the administrative processes, we cannot provide assurances as to future amounts of additional CDSOA funds that ultimately will be received, if any, and we cannot predict when we may receive any additional CDSOA funds.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. Currently, net benefit cost is reported as an employee cost within operating income (or capitalized into assets where appropriate). The amendment requires the bifurcation of net benefit cost. The service cost component will be presented with the other employee compensation costs in operating income (or capitalized in assets). The other components will be reported separately outside of operations and will not be eligible for capitalization. The amendment is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption will be permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. The guidance is required to be applied on a retrospective basis for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost (including gains and losses on curtailments and settlements, and termination benefits paid through plans), and on a prospective basis for the capitalization of only the service cost component of net benefit cost. Amounts capitalized into assets prior to the date of adoption should not be adjusted through a cumulative effect adjustment, but should continue to be recognized in the normal course, as for example, inventory is sold or fixed assets are depreciated. The Company has no service cost component in its net benefit cost. The impact of adopting this amendment will be the movement of approximately $340,000 of annual net benefit cost from within operating income to a separate expense outside of operations.


In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. In addition, ASU 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendment is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, however early application is permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued its final lease accounting standard, FASB Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC"),Leases(Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The lease liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments and the right-of -use asset will be based on the lease liability, subject to adjustment such as for initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the new standard retains a dual model similar to ASC 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. For lessees, operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current accounting by lessees for operating leases under ASC 840) while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current accounting by lessees for capital leases under ASC 840). Our leases as of December 31, 2017 principally relate to real estate leases for corporate office, showrooms and warehousing. The new standard will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures by reviewing all long-term leases and determining the potential impact. The standard is to be applied under the modified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of the new guidance for all periods presented.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). The amendments in ASU 2016-09 simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The new guidance requires that excess tax benefits (which represent the excess of actual tax benefits receive at the date of vesting or settlement over the benefits recognized over the vesting period or upon issuance of share-based payments) be recorded in the income statement as a reduction of income or income taxes when the awards vest or are settled. The new guidance also requires excess tax benefits to be classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. The adoption of these amendments in the first quarter of this year had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company has elected to maintain its practice of estimating forfeitures when recognizing expense for share-based payment awards.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). The guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This standard will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, provided all amendments are adopted in the same period. In November 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows(Topic 230): Restricted Cash. We have reviewed the standard and determined that our statement of cash flows will include changes in restricted cash with related disclosures. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. We do not anticipate ASU 2016-15 or ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. This ASU will supersede the which supersedes existing revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specificU.S. GAAP.  The updated guidance and creates a Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the guidance isrequires that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  To achieve that core principle, the guidance establishes a five-step approach for the recognition of revenue. In August 2015,March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferralfurther guidance to provide clarity regarding principal versus agent considerations, the identification of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers theperformance obligations and certain other matters.  The updates are currently effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.  Financial statement disclosures required under the impactguidance will enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, judgments and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows relating to contracts with customers.  We are substantially complete with the pending adoptionanalysis of ASU 2014-09our contracts to support revenue recognition and corresponding disclosures on itsour consolidated financial statements from the adoption of the new standard.  Based on the analysis of our contracts with customers, the timing, measurement, and has not yet determinedpresentation of revenues based on Topic 606 is consistent with our revenues under Topic 605. We adopted the above standard utilizing the modified retrospective method by whichbeginning January 1, 2018, with no adjustment to the Company will adopt the standard.opening balance of retained earnings.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”). The amendments in ASU 2015-11 require an entity to measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonable predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method. The amendments do not apply to LIFO or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost.  The amendment is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and should be applied prospectively, however early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.Critical Accounting Policies

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 (ASU 2015-17), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that all deferred tax liabilities and assets of the same tax jurisdiction or a tax filing group, as well as any related valuation allowance, be offset and presented as a single noncurrent amount in a classified balance sheet. Under ASU 2015-17, an entity should not offset deferred tax liabilities and assets attributable to different tax-paying components of the entity or to different tax jurisdictions, consistent with the guidance under existing U.S. GAAP. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of any interim or annual reporting period.  Guidance may be applied either prospectively, for all deferred tax assets and liabilities, or retrospectively (i.e., by reclassifying the comparative balance sheet).  We have decided to early adopt this standard and apply retrospective treatment of the standard.  Because we carry a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, we feel the classification of all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent provides a more informative disclosure and better reflects our having a full allowance against our net deferred tax assets.  The retrospective reclassification results in a reduction in current assets, total assets and long-term liabilities of $66,000 for the period ended December 31, 2014.

16

Critical Accounting Policies

We have chosen accounting policies that are necessary to accurately and fairly report our operational and financial position. Below are the critical accounting policies that involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue Recognition- Sales are recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, which typically occurs at the time of shipment. In some cases, however, title does not pass until the shipment is delivered to the customer. Revenue includes amounts billed to customers for shipping. Provisions are made at the time revenue is recognized for estimated product returns and for incentives that may be offered to customers. Amounts collected in advance of shipment are reflected as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet and then recognized as revenue as the risk of loss passes to the customer.

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts – We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the failure of our customers to make required payments. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and monitor their payment patterns. Should the financial condition of our customers deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required which would reduce our earnings.

 

Inventory valuation– Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost for all inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We evaluate our inventory to determine excess or slow movingslow-moving items based on current order activity and projections of future demand. For those items identified, we estimate our market value based on current trends. Those items having a market value less than cost are written down to their market value. If we fail to forecast demand accurately, we could be required to write off additional non-saleable inventory, which would also reduce our earnings.

 

Deferred taxes-- taxes - On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted into law. The income tax effects of changes in tax laws are recognized in the period when enacted.  Among its numerous changes to the Internal Revenue Code, the Act reduces U.S. corporate rates from 35% to 21% for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.  We have remeasured our deferred tax assets at the lower corporate tax rate, however, this was offset by a corresponding adjustment to the Company’s full valuation allowance. Additional federal and state interpretive guidance is still forthcoming that could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or give rise to new deferred tax amounts.   As such, the remeasurement of our deferred tax balance is provisional pending future guidance.  We reasonably anticipate that any such guidance will be available prior to December 31, 2018.      

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities given the enacted tax laws. We evaluate the need for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance by assessing whether it is more likely than not that the company will realize its deferred tax assets in the future.  The assessment of whether or not a valuation allowance is required often requires significant judgment, including the forecast of future taxable income. Adjustments to the deferred tax valuation allowance are made to earnings in the period when such assessment is made.

 


In preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we exercise judgment in estimating the potential exposure to unresolved tax matters and apply a more likely than not criteria approach for recording tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions. While actual results could vary, we believe we have adequate tax accruals with respect to the ultimate outcome of such unresolved tax matters.

 

Long-lived assets– Property, plant and equipment is reviewed for possible impairment when events indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation of impairment may affect the carrying value of long-lived assets, which could result in impairment charges in future periods that would lower our earnings. Our depreciation policy reflects judgments on the estimated remaining useful lives of assets.

 

Accruals for self-insurance reserves Accruals for self-insurance reserves (including workers’ compensation and employee medical) are determined based on a number of assumptions and factors, including historical payment trends and claims history, actuarial assumptions and current and estimated future economic conditions. These estimated liabilities are not discounted. If actual trends differ from these estimates, the financial results could be impacted. Historical trends have not differed materially from these estimates.

 

Actuarially valued benefit accruals and expenses We maintain three actuarially valued benefit plans. These are our deferred compensation plan, our supplemental employee retirement plan and our postretirement health care benefits program. The liability for these programs and the majority of their annual expense are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including discount rates and mortality projections, which are usually updated on an annual basis near the beginning of each year. We are required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates in making these assumptions. Changes in projected liability and expense may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions. The key assumptions used in developing the projected liabilities and expenses associated with the plans are outlined in Note 67 of the consolidated financial statements.

 

17


Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation - We record share-based payment awards at fair value on the grant date of the awards, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest, over the vesting period. The fair value of stock options was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of the restricted stock awards was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. For awards with performance conditions, we recognize compensation cost over the expected period to achieve the performance conditions, provided achievement of the performance conditions are deemed probable.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have transactions or relationships with “special purpose” entities, and we do not have any off-balance sheet financing other than normal operating leases primarily for warehousing, showroom and office space, and certain technology equipment.

 

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Not required to be provided by a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The consolidated financial statements and schedule listed in items 15(a) (1) and (a) (2) hereof are incorporated herein by reference and are filed as part of this report.

 

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.


 

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

 

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that due to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2017, the end of the period covered by this annual report.Annual Report. 

 

ManagementManagement’s’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on our evaluation, underwe identified one material weakness as of December 31, 2017.

During the frameworkfourth quarter of 2017, we identified a material weakness in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that ourinternal controls over stock-based compensation expense. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective controls related to the accounting with respect to modifications of share-based payment awards.  A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, was effective assuch that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of December 31, 2015.our annual or interim financial statements could occur but will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

ThereOther than the identification of the material weakness related to stock-based compensation expense, there were no changes in ourthe Company’s internal controlcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect ourthe Company’s internal controlcontrols over financial reporting.reporting during the year ended December 31, 2017. 

 

Item 9B.Other Information

 

None.

 

18


Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

Information related to our directors is set forth under the caption “Election of Directors” of our proxy statement (the “2016“2018 Proxy Statement”) for our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders scheduled for May 19, 2016.shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information relating to compliance with section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of our 20162018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information relating to the Audit Committee and Board of Directors’Directors determinations concerning whether a member of the Audit Committee of the Board is a “financial expert” as that term is defined under Item 407(d) (5) of Regulation S-K is set forth under the caption “Board and Board Committee Information” of our 20162018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information concerning our executive officers is included in Part I of this report under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our associates, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our code of ethics is posted on our website at www.stanleyfurniture.comwww.hgholdingsinc.net . Amendments to and waivers from our code of ethics will be posted to our website when permitted by applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules and regulations.


 

Item 11.     Executive Compensation

 

Information relating to our executive compensation is set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation” of our 20162018 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

Our information relating to this item is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” of our 20162018 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information concerning our equity compensation plan is included in Part II of this report under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

 

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

Our information relating to this item is set forth under the captions “Corporate Governance – Review of Transactions with Related Persons” and “Corporate Governance - Board and Board Committee Information” of our 20162018 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

Our information relating to this item is set forth under the caption “Independent Public Auditors” of our 20162018 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

19


PART IV

 

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)        Documents filed as a part of this Report:

(a)

(1)

Documents filed as a part of this Report:
(1)

The following consolidated financial statements are included in this report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss for each of the two years ended in the period ended December 31, 20152017

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015.2017

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)

(2)

Financial Statement Schedule:Schedule:

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015.2017

(b)Exhibits:

(b)

Exhibits: 

3.1

2.1

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2017, by and between Churchill Downs, LLC and Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2017). (1)

2.2

First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2018, by and between Churchill Downs, LLC and Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2018) (1)

3.1

The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended July 2, 2005).Registrant. 


3.2

By-laws of the Registrant as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 11, 2015)November 20, 2017).

4.1

3.3

Certificate of Designation of Series A Participating Preferred Stock of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 6, 2016).

4.1

The Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws and By-lawsCertificate of Designation of Series A Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to ExhibitsExhibit 3.1, Exhibit 3.2 and 3.2Exhibit 3.3 hereto).

10.1

4.2

Supplemental Retirement PlanRights Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2016, between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as restated effective January 1, 1993Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.84.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 1993).(1)

10.2

First Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., effective December 31, 1995, adopted December 15, 1995 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 1995).(1)

10.3

Stanley Interiors Corporation Deferred Compensation Capital Enhancement Plan, effective January 1, 1986, as amended and restated effective August 1, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938), filed December 10, 2014.(1)6, 2016).

10.4

4.3

2000 Incentive Compensation PlanAmendment No. 1, dated as of January 30, 2017, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2016, between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A4.1 to the Registrant’s Proxy  StatementForm 8-K (Commission FileRule No. 0-14938) for the special meeting of stockholders held on August 24, 2000)filed January 30, 2017).(1)

10.5

Second Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2002).(1)

10.6

Form of Stock Option Award under 2000 Incentive Plan (ISO) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2004).(1)

(1)Management contract or compensatory plan


10.7

Form of Stock Option Award under 2000 Incentive Plan (ISO/NSO) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2004).(1)

10.8

Form of Stock Option Award under 2000 Incentive Plan (Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2004).(1)

10.1

10.9

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of its Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed on September 25, 2008).

10.10

Change in Control Protection Agreement, originally dated December 11, 2009, by and between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Glenn Prillaman and amended and restated effective December 11, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (commission File No. 0-14938) filed on December 11, 2015). (1)

10.11

10.2

Change in Control Protection Agreement, dated December 11, 2015, by and between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Anita Wimmer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (commission File No. 0-14938) filed on December 11,17, 2015). (1)(2)

10.12

10.3

2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the annual meeting of stockholders held on April 15, 2008).(1)(2)

10.13

10.4

Form of Stock Option Award under 2008 Incentive Plan (Officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(1)(2)

10.5

10.14

Form of Stock Option Award under 2008 Incentive Plan (Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(1)(2)

10.15

10.6

Form of Restricted Stock Grant under 2008 Incentive Plan (Officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2012.(1)2011.(2)

10.16

Form of Restricted Stock Award under 2008 Incentive Plan (Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2012). (1)

10.17

10.7

2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the annual meeting of stockholders held on April 18, 2012). (1)(2)

10.8

10.18

Form of Stock Option Award under 2012 Incentive Plan (Officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2012). (1)

10.9

10.19

Form of Restricted Stock Award under 2012 Incentive Plan (Officers) (time vesting) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2012). (1)(2)

(1)Management contract or compensatory plan


Table of Contents

10.20

Separation Agreement and General Release, dated August 7, 2014, between the Registrant and Micah S. Goldstein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed August 8, 2014). (1)

10.10

10.21

Form of Restricted Stock Award under 2012 Incentive Plan (Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for year ended December 31, 2014). (1)(2)


10.11

10.22

Form of Restricted Stock Award under 2012 Incentive Plan (Officers) (time and performance vesting) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for year ended December 31, 2014).(1)(2)

10.23

10.12

Form of Restricted Stock Award under 2012 Incentive Plan (Officers) (performance vesting) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for year ended December 31, 2014).(1)(2)

10.24

Agreement dated February 12, 2015 by and among Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and the entities and natural persons listed on Exhibit A thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed February 12, 2015).

10.13

10.25

Agreement dated January 7, 2016 by and among Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and the entities and natural persons listed on Exhibit A thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed January 8, 2016).

21

10.14

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, by and between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Well Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended October 1, 2016).

10.15

Security Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, by and among Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., Stanley Furniture Company 2.0, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended October 1, 2016).

10.16

Amendment effective as of November 30, 2016 to Employment Agreement between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Glenn Prillaman dated July 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 2, 2016).(2)

10.17

Amendment effective as of November 30, 2016 to Change in Control Protection Agreement between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Anita Wimmer effective as of December 11, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 2, 2016).(2)

10.18

Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2017, by and among Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and the entities and natural persons listed on Exhibit A thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed January 30, 2017).

10.19

Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 30, 2017, to the Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2016, by and among Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and the entities and natural persons listed on Exhibit A thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed January 30, 2017).

10.20

Employment Agreement dated July 22, 2016 between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Glenn Prillaman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended July 2, 2016).(2)

10.21

Separation Agreement by and between Glenn Prillaman and Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 8, 2017) .(2)

10.22

Consent Agreement, dated December 7, 2017, between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 8, 2017).

10.23

Engagement Letter, effective October 23, 2017, between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and The Finely Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 8, 2017).

10.24

Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2017, between Hale Partnership Fund, L.P., Talanta Fund, L.P. and the other entities and natural persons party thereto, including, for limited purposes, Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed December 8, 2017.


10.25

Subordinated Promissory Note, dated March 2, 2018, of Churchill Downs LLC in favor of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2018)

10.26

Intercreditor and Debt Subordination Agreement, dated March 2, 2018, between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and North Mill Capital LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2018)

21

List of Subsidiaries. (2)(3)

23.1

Consent of BDO USA, LLP. (2) (3) 

31.1

Certification by Glenn Prillaman,Steven A. Hale II, our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (2)(3)

31.2

Certification by Anita W. Wimmer, our Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (2)(3)

32.1

Certification by Glenn Prillaman,Steven A. Hale II, our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(3)(4)

32.2

Certification by Anita W. Wimmer, our Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(3)(4)

101

The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of operations, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), (iv) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, (v) the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and (vi) document and entity information. (2)(3)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Certain schedules to these agreements have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedules and/or exhibits will be furnished to the SEC upon request.

Management contract or compensatory plan

(2)

Filed Herewith

(3)

Furnished Herewith

 

 

Item 16.     10-K Summary

 

22None.

 



 

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

HG HOLDINGS, INC.

 

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

February 23, 2016

By: /s/Glenn Prillaman

March 23, 2018

By:

Glenn Prillaman/s/Steven A. Hale II

President and

Steven A. Hale II

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title

Date

/s/John D. LapeySteven A. Hale II

(Steven A. Hale)

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

FebruaryMarch 23, 20162018

/s/John D. Lapey

(John D. “Ian” Lapey)

/s/Glenn Prillaman

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director

FebruaryMarch 23, 20162018

(Glenn Prillaman)

/s/Anita W. Wimmer

(Anita W. Wimmer)

Vice-President – Finance/Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

FebruaryMarch 23, 20162018

(Anita W. Wimmer)

/s/Michael P. Haley

Director

February 23, 2016

(Michael P. Haley)

/s/D. Paul Dascoli

Director

February 23, 2016

(D.  Paul Dascoli)

/s/T. Scott McIlhenny, Jr.

Director

February 23, 2016

(T. Scott McIlhenny, Jr.)

/s/Jeffrey S. Gilliam

Director

February 23, 2016

(Jeffrey S. Gilliam)

/s/Justyn R. Putnam

Director

FebruaryMarch 23, 20162018

(Justyn R. Putnam)

23

 



 

HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152017

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Page

Reports

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016

F-4

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017 

F-5F-4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017 

F-6

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017

F-7

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017

F-8

F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-9

F-8

Financial Statement Schedule

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017

S-1

F-1




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Stanley Furniture Company,HG Holdings, Inc.

High Point, North Carolina

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Stanley Furniture Company,HG Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014 and2016, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’loss, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the two years  inthen ended, and the period ended December 31, 2015. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, we have also audited therelated notes and financial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 listed in the accompanying index.  Theseindex (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and schedule2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  Anmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit includesof its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Emphasis of Matter

As described in Note 11, the Company sold substantially all of their assets to Churchill Downs LLC on March 2, 2018.In our  Our opinion the consolidated financial statements referredis not modified with respect to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stanley Furniture, Inc. at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.this matter.

Also, in our opinion,

We have served as the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth herein.

CompanyWe also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.auditor since 2014.

 

 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

FebruaryMarch 23, 2016

F-2


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.

High Point, North Carolina

We have audited Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and our report dated February 23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

February 23, 2016

F-32018

                                   



 

Table of Contents

HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

 

  

December 31,

 
  

2017

  

2016

 

ASSETS

        

Current assets:

        

Cash

 $975  $4,212 

Restricted cash

  631   663 

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $203 and $272

  3,146   3,492 

Inventory, net

  23,231   22,951 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  545   729 

Total current assets

  28,528   32,047 
         

Property, plant and equipment, net

  1,449   1,606 

Other assets

  2,593   2,868 

Total assets

 $32,570  $36,521 
         

LIABILITIES

        

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

 $9,252  $5,674 

Accrued salaries, wages and benefits

  1,781   1,371 

Deferred revenue

  500   759 

Other accrued expenses

  1,207   593 

Total current liabilities

  12,740   8,397 
         

Deferred compensation

  4,101   4,219 

Supplemental retirement plan

  1,701   1,724 

Other long-term liabilities

  1,793   2,199 

Total liabilities

  20,335   16,539 
         

Commitments and Contingencies (Footnote 9)

        
         

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

        

Common stock, $0.02 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 14,920,117 and 14,730,805 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

  298   275 

Capital in excess of par value

  17,104   16,840 

Retained (deficit) earnings

  (2,745)  5,129 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (2,422)  (2,262)

Total stockholders’ equity

  12,235   19,982 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 $32,570  $36,521 

December 31,

2015

2014

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

Cash

$

6,497

 

$

5,584

Restricted cash

663

1,190

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $404 and $375

 

6,925

 

 

5,853

Inventory

20,934

24,216

Assets of discontinued operations

 

-

 

 

1,373

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

959

 

890

Total current assets

 

35,978

 

 

39,106

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

1,787

 

 

1,990

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies, net

22,253

15,129

Other assets

 

3,128

 

 

3,416

Total assets

$

63,146

$

59,641

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

$

5,883

$

6,425

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

13

 

 

93

Accrued salaries, wages and benefits

1,367

1,738

Other accrued expenses

 

321

 

 

1,437

Total current liabilities

7,584

9,693

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred compensation

4,301

4,964

Supplemental retirement plan

 

1,797

 

 

1,971

Other long-term liabilities

 

1,812

 

2,034

Total liabilities

 

15,494

 

 

18,662

Commitments and Contingencies (Footnote 10)

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.02 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 14,906,831 and 14,780,326 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively

283

283

Capital in excess of par value

 

17,521

 

 

16,710

Retained earnings

32,023

26,683

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(2,175)

 

 

(2,697)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

47,652

 

40,979

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

63,146

 

$

59,641

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part

 of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4



 

Table of Contents


HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

For the Years Ended

December 31,

2015

2014

Net sales

$

57,364

 

$

60,623

Cost of sales

 

43,679

 

 

48,610

Gross profit 

 

13,685

 

 

12,013

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

12,661

 

 

14,882

Operating income (loss)

 

1,024

 

 

(2,869)

Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net

 

5,308

 

 

-

Other income (expense), net

42

(2,174)

Interest expense, net

 

947

 

 

2,884

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

5,427

 

 

(7,927)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

76

 

 

(39)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

5,351

 

 

(7,888)

Net (loss) from discontinued operations

 

(11)

 

(22,004)

Net income (loss)

$

5,340

 

$

(29,892)

Basic income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$

.37

$

(.56)

(Loss) from discontinued operations

 

-

 

 

(1.55)

Net income (loss)

$

.37

$

(2.11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$

.37

 

$

(.56)

(Loss) from discontinued operations

 

-

 

(1.55)

Net income (loss)

$

.37

 

$

(2.11)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

14,273

 

14,197

Diluted

 

14,542

 

 

14,197

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2017

  

2016

 

Net sales

 $45,178  $44,574 
         

Cost of sales

  40,342   36,160 
         

Gross profit

  4,836   8,414 
         

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  13,042   13,982 
         

Operating loss

  (8,206)  (5,568)
         

Income from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net

  433   1,103 

Other income, net

  32   26 

Interest expense, net

  3   101 
         

Loss before income taxes

  (7,744)  (4,540)
         

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (35)  718 
         

Net loss

 $(7,709) $(5,258)
         

Loss per share:

        

Basic

 $(.54) $(.37)

Diluted

 $(.54) $(.37)
         

Weighted average shares outstanding:

        

Basic

  14,236   14,139 

Diluted

  14,236   14,139 
         
Dividend per share:        

Special dividend

 $-  $1.50 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-5


 


 

Table of Contents

HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)LOSS

 (in (in thousands)

 

 

For the Years Ended

December 31,

2015

2014

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

5,340

 

$

(29,892)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Amortization of prior service credit

 

92

 

 

154

Actuarial (gain) loss

(497)

1,013

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

(117)

 

 

(70)

Adjustments to net periodic postretirement (benefit) loss

 

(522)

 

1,097

Comprehensive income (loss)

$

5,862

 

$

(30,989)

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2017

  

2016

 
         

Net loss

 $(7,709) $(5,258)

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

        

Actuarial loss (gain)

  268   174 

Amortization of actuarial loss

  (108)  (87)

Adjustments to net periodic postretirement loss (benefit)

  160   87 

Comprehensive loss

 $(7,869) $(5,345)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6



 

Table of Contents

HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

For each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20152017

(in thousands)

 

                  Accumulated     
          Capital in  Retained  Other     
  Common Stock  Excess of  Earnings  Comprehensive     
  Shares  Amount  Par Value  (Deficit)  (Loss) Income  Total 
                         

Balance at December 31, 2015

  14,907  $283  $17,521  $32,023  $(2,175) $47,652 
                         

Net loss

  -   -   -   (5,258)  -   (5,258)

Other comprehensive loss

  -   -   -   -   (87)  (87)

Special dividends declared

  -   -   -   (21,636)  -   (21,636)

Restricted stock grants

  231   -   -   -   -   - 

Stock purchase and retirement

  (400)  (8)  (1,004)  -   -   (1,012)

Stock purchase and retirement for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted awards

  (7)  -   (15)  -   -   (15)

Stock-based compensation

  -   -   338   -   -   338 
                         

Balance at December 31, 2016

  14,731  $275  $16,840  $5,129  $(2,262) $19,982 
                         

Net loss

  -   -   -   (7,709)  -   (7,709)

Other comprehensive loss

  -   -   -   -   (160)  (160)

Dividends

              (165)      (165)

Restricted stock grants

  458   -   -   -   -   - 

Restricted stock forfeited

  (106)  -   -   -   -   - 

Stock purchase and retirement for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted awards

  (163)  -   (136)  -   -   (136)

Other

      23   (23)  -   -   - 

Stock-based compensation

  -   -   423   -   -   423 
                         

Balance at December 31, 2017

  14,920  $298  $17,104  $(2,745) $(2,422) $12,235 

 

Accumulated

Capital in

Other

Common Stock

Excess of

Retained

Comprehensive

Shares

Amount

Par Value

Earnings

(Loss) Income

Total

Balance at December 31, 2013

14,520

 

$

283

 

$

15,732

 

$

56,575

 

$

(1,600)

 

$

70,990

Net loss

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

(29,892)

 

 

-

 

 

(29,892)

Other comprehensive loss

-

-

-

-

(1,097)

(1,097)

Restricted stock grants

400

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

Restricted stock forfeited

(140)

-

-

-

-

-

Stock-based compensation

-

 

 

-

 

 

978

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

978

Balance at December 31, 2014

14,780

 

 

283

 

 

16,710

 

 

26,683

 

 

(2,697)

 

 

40,979

Net income

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

5,340

 

 

-

 

 

5,340

Other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

522

522

Restricted stock grants

229

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

Restricted stock forfeited

(98)

-

-

-

-

-

Stock purchase and retirement for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted awards

(4)

 

 

-

 

 

(13)

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

(13)

Stock-based compensation

-

 

-

 

824

 

-

 

-

 

824

Balance at December 31, 2015

14,907

 

$

283

 

$

17,521

 

$

32,023

 

$

(2,175)

 

$

47,652

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7



 

Table of Contents

HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

  

For the Years Ended

 
  

December 31,

 
  

2017

  

2016

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Cash received from customers

 $45,227  $48,248 

Cash paid to suppliers and employees

  (48,328)  (51,243)

Cash from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net

  433   1,103 

Interest paid, net

  (3)  (191)

Income tax payments

  19   (510)

Net cash used in operating activities

  (2,652)  (2,593)
         

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Proceeds from surrender of corporate-owned life insurance policies

  -   28,139 

Decrease in restricted cash

  32   - 

Proceeds from sale of assets

  24   - 

Purchase of other assets

  (22)  (14)

Net cash provided by investing activities

  34   28,125 
         

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Stock purchase and retirement for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted awards

  (136)  (15)

Payments on insurance policy loans

  -   (5,495)

Payment of dividends

  (483)  (21,282)

Purchase and retirement of common stock

  -   (1,012)

Net cash used in financing activities

  (619)  (27,804)
         

Cash flows from discontinued operations:

        

Cash used in operating activities

  -   (13)

Net cash used in discontinued operations

  -   (13)
         

Net decrease in cash

  (3,237)  (2,285)

Cash at beginning of year

  4,212   6,497 

Cash at end of year

 $975  $4,212 

Reconciliation of net( loss to net cash used in thousands) operating activities:

 

For the Years Ended

December 31,

2015

2014

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash received from customers

$

56,271

$

60,102

Cash paid to suppliers and employees

 

(55,898)

 

 

(67,139)

Cash from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net

5,308

-

Interest paid, net

 

(987)

 

 

(4,179)

Income tax payments

 

(105)

 

       -

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

 

4,589

 

 

(11,216)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of short-term investments

-

10,000

Decrease in restricted cash

 

527

 

 

547

Proceeds from sale of assets

4

-

Purchase of other assets

 

(15)

 

 

(44)

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

516

 

10,503

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Stock purchase and retirement for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted awards

 

(13)

 

 

-

Payments on insurance policy loans

(5,461)

(13,708)

Proceeds from insurance policy loans

 

-

 

 

2,701

Net cash used by financing activities

 

(5,474)

 

(11,007)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from discontinued operations:

Cash provided by operating activities

 

1,282

 

 

4,744

Cash provided by investing activities

 

-

 

5,342

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

 

1,282

 

 

10,086

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

913

 

 

(1,634)

Cash at beginning of year

 

5,584

 

7,218

Cash at end of year

$

6,497

 

$

5,584

Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

5,340

$

(29,892)

Loss from discontinued operations

 

11

 

 

22,004

Depreciation

185

188

Amortization

 

285

 

 

344

Stock-based compensation

824

978

Other, net

 

14

 

 

-

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

 

(1,072)

 

 

(488)

Inventories

3,282

(315)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(1,747)

 

 

(1,044)

Accounts payable

(542)

(634)

Accrued salaries, wages and benefits

 

177

 

 

(2,273)

Other accrued expenses

(1,109)

33

Other long-term liabilities

 

(1,059)

 

 

(117)

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

$

4,589

$

(11,216)

Net loss

 $(7,709) $(5,258)

Depreciation

  171   181 

Amortization

  290   289 

Stock-based compensation

  423   338 

Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

  (16)  - 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  346   3,433 

Inventories

  (280)  (2,017)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  169   (176)

Accounts payable

  3,578   233 

Accrued salaries, wages and benefits

  266   (250)

Other accrued expenses

  368   235 

Other long-term liabilities

  (258)  399 

Net cash used in operating activities

 $(2,652) $(2,593)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of the consolidated financial statements

 

F-8


 


Table of Contents


HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.1.       Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include HG Holdings, Inc., formerly Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., and our wholly owned subsidiaries.subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. We arewere a leading design, marketing and sourcing resource in the middle-to-upscale segment of the wood furniture residential market.

 

For financial reporting purposes, we operate in one reportable segment where substantially all revenues are from the sale of residential wood furniture products.

 

On March 2, 2018, we sold substantially all of our assets (the “Asset Sale”) to Churchill Downs LLC (“Buyer”), pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2017, as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated January 22, 2017 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”).  As consideration for the Asset Sale, Buyer paid a purchase price consisting of cash in the amount of approximately $10.8 million (of which approximately $1.3 million was used to pay the outstanding amount under our credit agreement), a subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of approximately $7.4 million, and a 5% equity interest in Buyer’s post-closing ultimate parent company, Churchill Downs Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands business company.  Buyer also assumed substantially all of our liabilities.

As a result of the sale, on March 2, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to HG Holdings, Inc. The amendment became effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 2, 2018.

Cash

We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

Short-term InvestmentsRestricted Cash

Investments with maturitiesRestricted cash includes collateral deposits required under the Company’s line of greater than three months and less than one year atcredit agreement, to guarantee the time of purchase are considered short-term investments.  Our investments were in certificates of deposits, which we held until maturity.  We reportedCompany’s workers compensation insurance policy. The restricted cash balance is expected to mature over the investments at cost with earnings recognized through interest income.next twelve months.

 

Accounts Receivable

Substantially all of our accounts receivable are due from retailers and dealers that sell residential home furnishings, which consist of a large number of entities with a broad geographic dispersion. We continually perform credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require collateral. Once we have determined the receivable is uncollectible, it is charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts. In the event a receivable is determined to be potentially uncollectible, we engage collection agencies to attempt to collect amounts owed to us after all internal collection attempts have ended.

 

Revenue Recognition

Sales are recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, which typically occurs at the time of shipment. In some cases, however, title does not pass until the shipment is delivered to the customer. Revenue includes amounts billed to customers for shipping. Provisions are made at the time revenue is recognized for estimated product returns and for incentives that may be offered to customers. Amounts collected in advance of shipment are reflected as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet and then recognized as revenue as the risk of loss passes to the customer.

 

Inventories

Inventories are valuedstated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.Net realizable value. Cost for all inventories is determined usingbased solely on those charges incurred in the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.acquisition and production of the related inventory (i.e. material, freight, labor and overhead).  Management regularly examines inventory to determine if there are indicators that the carrying value exceeds its net realizable value.  Experience has shown that the most significant indicators of the need for inventory markdowns are the age of the inventory and the planned discontinuance of certain items.  As a result, we provide inventory valuation write-downs based upon established percentages based on age of the inventory and planned discontinuance of certain items.  As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had approximately $23.2 million and $23.0 million of finished goods, net of a valuation allowance of $2.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives.  Depreciation expense is charged to cost of sales or selling, general and administrative expenses based on the nature of the asset.  Gains and losses related to dispositions and retirements are included in income.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to income as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized.  Assets are reviewed for possible impairment when events indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation of impairment may affect the carrying value of property, plant and equipment, which could result in impairment charges in future periods.  Our depreciation policy reflects judgments on the estimated useful lives of assets.  Our long-lived assets were tested for impairment at December 31, 2017 and determined that the long-lived assets were not impaired.

 


Capitalized Software Cost

We amortize purchased computer software costs using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the related products. Unamortized cost at December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 was approximately $2.7$2.1 million and $2.9$2.4 million, respectively, and is included in other assets.

F-9


Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

1.         Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance Policies

At December 31, 2015, wewe owned 27 life insurance policies as a funding arrangement for our deferred compensation plan discussed in Note 6.7. These corporate-owned policies had a net cash surrender value of $22.3$22.3 million. We had $5.5$5.5 million in loans and accrued interest outstanding against the cash surrender value. The growth in cash surrender value of these corporate-owned policies, net of related premiums and plan administrative costs, is included in operating income. Interest on the insurance policy loans is recorded as interest expense below operating income. In the first quarter of 2016, we liquidated the corporate-owned life insurance policies with cash surrender value of $28.1 million. We received $22.4 million in proceeds, net of outstanding loans and accrued interest.

 

Actuarially valued benefit accruals and expenses

We maintain three actuarially valued benefit plans. These are our deferred compensation plan, our supplemental employee retirement plan and our postretirement health care benefits program. The liability for these programs and the majority of their annual expense are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including discount rates and mortality projections, which are usually updated on an annual basis near the beginning of each year. We are required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates in making these assumptions. Changes in projected liability and expense may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions. The key assumptions used in developing the projected liabilities and expenses associated with the plans are outlined in Note 67 of the consolidated financial statements.

 

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are determined based on the difference between the consolidated financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax expense represents the change in the deferred tax asset/liability balance. Income tax credits are reported as a reduction of income tax expense in the year in which the credits are generated. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions are recorded as income tax expense.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting for fair value measurements requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which fair value measurements in their entirety fall, segregating fair value measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1)1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2)2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)3). The fair value of receivables and payables approximate the carrying amount because of the short maturity of these instruments.

 

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes any dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock calculated using the treasury stock method.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

We record share-based payment awards at fair value on the grant date of the awards, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest, over the vesting period. The fair value of stock options was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of the restricted stock awards was based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. For awards with performance conditions, we recognize compensation cost over the expected period to achieve the performance conditions, provided achievement of the performance conditions are deemed probable.

 


Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Changes in such estimates may affect amounts reported in future periods.

 

F-10


Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

1.         Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2014 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 presentation.  These reclassifications do not have an impact tot consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, or consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, 2017-07,Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. Currently, net benefit cost is reported as an employee cost within operating income (or capitalized into assets where appropriate). The amendment requires the bifurcation of net benefit cost. The service cost component will be presented with the other employee compensation costs in operating income (or capitalized in assets). The other components will be reported separately outside of operations and will not be eligible for capitalization. The amendment is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption will be permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. The guidance is required to be applied on a retrospective basis for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost (including gains and losses on curtailments and settlements, and termination benefits paid through plans), and on a prospective basis for the capitalization of only the service cost component of net benefit cost. Amounts capitalized into assets prior to the date of adoption should not be adjusted through a cumulative effect adjustment, but should continue to be recognized in the normal course, as for example, inventory is sold or fixed assets are depreciated. The Company has no service cost component in its net benefit cost. The impact of adopting this amendment will be the movement of approximately $340,000 of annual net benefit cost from within operating income to a separate expense outside of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. In addition, ASU 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendment is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, however early application is permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued its final lease accounting standard, FASB Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC"),Leases(Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The lease liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments and the right-of -use asset will be based on the lease liability, subject to adjustment such as for initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the new standard retains a dual model similar to ASC 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. For lessees, operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current accounting by lessees for operating leases under ASC 840) while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current accounting by lessees for capital leases under ASC 840). Our leases as of December 31, 2017 principally relate to real estate leases for corporate office, showrooms and warehousing. The new standard will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures by reviewing all long-term leases and determining the potential impact. The standard is to be applied under the modified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of the new guidance for all periods presented.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). The amendments in ASU 2016-09 simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The new guidance requires that excess tax benefits (which represent the excess of actual tax benefits receive at the date of vesting or settlement over the benefits recognized over the vesting period or upon issuance of share-based payments) be recorded in the income statement as a reduction of income or income taxes when the awards vest or are settled. The new guidance also requires excess tax benefits to be classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. The adoption of these amendments in the first quarter of this year had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company has elected to maintain its practice of estimating forfeitures when recognizing expense for share-based payment awards.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15,Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). The guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This standard will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, provided all amendments are adopted in the same period. In November 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-18,Statement of Cash Flows(Topic 230): Restricted Cash. We have reviewed the standard and determined that our statement of cash flows will include changes in restricted cash with related disclosures. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. We do not anticipate ASU 2016-15 or ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

InMay 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”606). The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. This ASU will supersede the which supersedes existing revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specificU.S. GAAP.  The updated guidance and creates a Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the guidance isrequires that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  To achieve that core principle, the guidance establishes a five-step approach for the recognition of revenue. In August 2015, March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferralfurther guidance to provide clarity regarding principal versus agent considerations, the identification of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers theperformance obligations and certain other matters.  The updates are currently effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.  Financial statement disclosures required under the impactguidance will enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, judgments and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows relating to contracts with customers.  We are substantially complete with the pending adoptionanalysis of ASU 2014-09our contracts to support revenue recognition and corresponding disclosures on itsour consolidated financial statements from the adoption of the new standard.  Based on the analysis of our contracts with customers, the timing, measurement, and has not yet determinedpresentation of revenues based on Topic 606 is consistent with our revenues under Topic 605. We adopted the above standard utilizing the modified retrospective method by which the Company will adopt the standard.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”). The amendments in ASU 2015-11 require an entity to measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonable predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method. The amendments do not apply to LIFO or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost.  The amendment is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and should be applied prospectively, however early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate ASU 2015-11 to have a material impactJanuary 1, 2018, with no adjustment to the consolidated financial statements.opening balance of retained earnings.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 (ASU 2015-17), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that all deferred tax liabilities and assets of the same tax jurisdiction or a tax filing group, as well as any related valuation allowance, be offset and presented as a single noncurrent amount in a classified balance sheet. Under ASU 2015-17, an entity should not offset deferred tax liabilities and assets attributable to different tax-paying components of the entity or to different tax jurisdictions, consistent with the guidance under existing U.S. GAAP. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of any interim or annual reporting period.  Guidance may be applied either prospectively, for all deferred tax assets and liabilities, or retrospectively (i.e., by reclassifying the comparative balance sheet).  We have decided to early adopt this standard and apply retrospective treatment of the standard.  Because we carry a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, we feel the classification of all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent provides a more informative disclosure and better reflects our having a full allowance against our net deferred tax assets.  The retrospective reclassification results in a reduction in current assets, total assets and long-term liabilities of $66,000 for the period ended December 31, 2014.

F-11

 


Table of Contents

2STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

2..     Property, Plant and Equipment

  

Depreciable

        
  

lives

 

(in thousands)

 
  

(in years)

 

2017

  

2016

 

Machinery and equipment

  5to12 $2,632  $2,675 

Leasehold improvements

  9to15  1,842   1,833 

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

      4,474   4,508 

Less accumulated depreciation

      3,025   2,902 

Property, plant and equipment, net

     $1,449  $1,606 



3.       Debt

 

Depreciable

lives

(in thousands)

(in years)

2015

2014

Machinery and equipment

5 to 12

 

$

2,675

 

$

3,883

Leasehold improvements

15

 

1,833

 

1,833

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

 

 

 

4,508

 

 

5,716

Less accumulated depreciation

 

2,721

 

3,726

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

$

1,787

 

$

1,990

We have a secured $6.0 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) with an excess availability requirement of $2.0 million resulting in maximum borrowings of $4.0 million under the facility, subject to borrowing base eligibility requirements.  The credit facility matures in October 2018 and is secured by our accounts receivable, inventory and certain other assets. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at a variable per annum rate equal to the daily three-month London Bank Interbank Offered Rate plus 3.5%.

 

The credit f3.acility contains covenants that, among other things limit our ability to incur certain types of debt or liens, pay dividends, enter into mergers and consolidations or use proceeds of borrowing for other than permitted uses

On November 20, 2017, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell substantially all of its assets to Churchill Downs LLC. On December 7, 2017, the Company entered into a letter of consent (the “Consent”) with Wells Fargo, pursuant to the debt agreement, in which Wells Fargo consented to, and waived any events of default relating to, the Company’s entry into the asset purchase agreement. Wells Fargo acknowledges in the Consent that the Company may close the Asset Sale if, prior to or concurrently with such closing, the Company terminates the credit facility in accordance with its terms and complies with all requirements of the credit facility necessary to cause Wells Fargo to release its security interest in the assets of the Company. Wells Fargo further agreed in the Consent to require up to three business days’ notice of the termination of the credit facility instead of the thirty days currently required. Wells Fargo also agreed to consent to the replacement of Glenn Prillaman as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on an interim basis. 

The credit facility also includes a covenant requiring us to maintain a minimum fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.1 to 1.0 for the trailing twelve months with an initial compliance date at December 31, 2017. We obtained a waiver on November 9, 2017 for compliance with this covenant as of December 31, 2017, as long as the aggregate principal outstanding under the credit facility is not greater than $250,000 on December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017,no borrowings were outstanding under this revolving credit facility.

On March 2, 2018, in connection with the Asset Sale discussed in Note 11, the Company terminated its Credit Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, as amended, with Wells Fargo and the related Security Agreement with Wells Fargo, dated as of October 25, 2016.

4.     Income Taxes

 

The provision for income tax (benefit) expense (benefit) consists of (in thousands):

 

  

2017

  

2016

 

Current:

        

Federal

 $(10) $525 

State

  (25)  193 

Total current

  (35)  718 

Deferred:

        

Federal

  -   - 

State

  -   - 

Total deferred

  -   - 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 $(35) $718 

 

2015

2014

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$

52

$

-

State

 

24

 

 

(39)

Total current

 

76

 

(39)

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

-

-

State

 

-

 

 

-

Total deferred

 

-

 

-

Income tax expense (benefit)

$

76

 

$

(39)


 

A reconciliation of the difference between the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate follows:

 

2017

2016

Federal statutory rate

35.0%35.0%

State tax, net of federal benefit

(12.3)(6.1)

State tax credits and adjustments

(1.7)1.8

Change in federal tax rate

(54.6)-

Change in cash surrender value of life insurance policies

-(185.1)

Valuation allowance increase

38.8143.2

Other, net

(4.7)(4.6)

Effective income tax rate

0.5%(15.8)%

 

2015

2014

Federal statutory rate

35.0

%

 

(35.0)

%

State tax, net of federal benefit

.6

(2.4)

State tax credits and adjustments

(1.9

) 

 

.1

 

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies

(9.0)

(2.7)

Valuation allowance (decrease) increase

(23.6)

 

 

39.9

 

Other, net

.3

 

   -

 

Effective income tax rate

1.4

%

 

(.1)

%

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted into law.  We have remeasured the below deferred tax assets at the lower corporate tax rate of 21% based on when we expect those balances to reverse, however, this was offset by a corresponding adjustment to the Company’s full valuation allowance.

 

In accordance withWe have substantially completed our decision to early adoptprovisional analysis of the income tax effects of the Tax Act and apply retrospectively recorded a reasonable estimate of such effects. However, the SEC staff issued guidance regarding application of Financial Accounting Standards Update Board income tax guidance in the reporting period that includes December 22, 2017 No. 2015-17 (ASU 2015-17), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,– the date on which requires that all deferredthe Tax Act was signed into law – to address situations when a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax liabilities and assetseffects of the sameTax Act. We have estimated the tax jurisdiction or a tax filing group, as well as anyimpacts related valuation allowance, be offset and presented as a single noncurrent amount in a classified balance sheet, we have reclassified all of ourto the impact to deferred tax assets and liabilities and included these amounts in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, on a provisional basis. In this regard, the Tax Act repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax, or AMT, regime, including claiming a refund and full realization of remaining AMT credits. We have not been able to noncurrent.  The impactmake a reasonable estimate with respect to the realization of existing AMT credit carryforwards, and accordingly, continue to apply the income tax-related accounting guidance that was in effect immediately prior to the enactment of the Tax Act. In order for us to complete the income tax effects of the Tax Act on the prior year was to reduce current netexisting AMT deferred tax assetsasset, we need to further analyze the nature, validity, and long-term netrecoverability of the AMT-related deferred tax liabilitiescredit carryforwards prior to recording the underlying appropriate tax benefit. Accordingly, the ultimate impact related to the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially, due to, among other things, completing our analysis of the realization of available AMT credit refunds, further refinement of our calculations, changes in interpretations and assumptions that we made, additional guidance that may be issued by $66,000. 

F-12


Tablethe U.S. Government, and actions and related accounting policy decisions that we may take as a result of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

3.      Income Taxes (continued)the Tax Act. We expect this analysis to be complete when our 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.

 

The income tax effects of temporary differences that comprise deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 follow (in thousands):

 

 

2015

2014

Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities):

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

$

150

$

294

Other accrued expenses

 

248

 

 

425

Property, plant and equipment

(1,255)

(1,187)

Employee benefits

 

4,252

 

 

5,649

Contribution carryforward

278

279

AMT credit

 

676

 

 

631

Net operating loss

 

14,845

 

15,633

Gross non-current deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 

19,194

 

 

21,724

Less valuation allowance

 

(19,194)

 

(21,724)

Net noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities)

$

-

 

$

-

  

2017

  

2016

 

Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities):

        

Accounts receivable

 $46  $99 

Other accrued expenses

  339   587 

Property, plant and equipment

  (659)  (1,190)

Employee benefits

  1,970   3,979 

Contribution carryforward

  -   181 

AMT credit

  1,192   1,205 

Net operating loss

  6,733   7,727 

Gross non-current deferred tax assets

  9,621   12,588 

Less valuation allowance

  (9,621)  (12,588)

Net noncurrent deferred tax assets

 $-  $- 

 

We have U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $40.1$29.2 million which are available to reduce future taxable income. The federal net operating loss will begin expiring in 2031.2033. We have combined state net operating loss carryforwards of $27.1$22.3 million that will expire at various times beginning in 2026.2027.

 

During 2015, we recorded an $854,000 adjustment to correct an error in the prior year value of the employee benefits deferred tax asset to appropriately reflect the amount recorded associated with the future benefits of stock option compensation deductions.  Since we have a full valuation allowance, this adjustment had no impact on the consolidated statement of operations and is considered immaterial.

201During 2015,7, we recorded a non-cash credit to our valuation allowance of $2.5$3.0 million against our December 31, 2015 2017 deferred tax assets. The primary assets which are covered by this valuation allowance are employee benefits and net operating losses in excess of the amounts which can be carried back to prior periods. The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires an assessment of both positive and negative evidence when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. Our results over the most recent three-yearfour-year period were heavily affected by our business restructuring activities. Our cumulative loss excluding income from the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, in the most recent three-year period, in our view, represented sufficient negative evidence to require a valuation allowance. We intend to maintain a valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal, resulting in no deferred tax asset balance being recognized. Should we determine that we will not be able to realize all or part of our deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset will be charged to income in the period such determination is made.

 

The unrecognized tax benefits activity for the year ended December 31 followsfollows (in thousands):

  

2017

  

2016

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1

 $471  $307 

Gross (decrease) increases in tax positions of prior years

  (17)  164 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31

 $454  $471 



2015

2014

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1

$

309

 

$

351

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

(2)

 

(42)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31

$

307

 

$

309

As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, we had approximately $76,000$80,000 and $52,000$97,000 of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions, respectively.

 

Total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect our effective tax rate if recognized is $200,000$358,000 at December 31, 2015 2017 and $201,000$307,000 at December 31, 2014. 2016. The 2011, 2012, 2013 and 20142010 through 2016 tax years remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions.

 

 

F-13


 

Table of Contents

5.STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

4.       Stockholders’ Equity

 

In addition to common stock, authorized capital includes 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock. None was outstanding during the threetwo years ended December 31, 2015.  2017. The Board of Directors (“Board”) is authorized to issue such stock in series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences, rights, limitations and restrictions with respect to any series of such shares. Such “blank check” preferred stock may rank prior to common stock as to dividend rights, liquidation preferences or both, may have full or limited voting rights and may be convertible into shares of common stock.

 

Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated using the following share data (in thousands):

2015

2014

Weighted average shares outstanding for basic calculation

14,273

 

14,197

Dilutive effect of stock options

269

-    

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted calculation

14,542

 

14,197

2017

2016

Weighted average shares outstanding for basic calculation

14,23614,139

Dilutive effect of stock options

--

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted calculation

14,23614,139

 

In 2014,2017 and 2016, the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted shares was not recognized since we had a net loss.   Approximately 1.2 million shares in 2015 and 1.4 million shares in 2014 were issuable upon the exercise of stock options, which were not included in the diluted per share calculation because they were anti-dilutive.  In 2015 and 2014, approximately 51,000 and 544,000 shares of restricted stock, respectively, were not included because they were anti-dilutive.

 

During 2015, we repurchased 4,622We will repurchase common shares of our common stock for approximately $13,000, which werethat are tendered by recipients of restricted stock awards to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock.During 2017 and 2016, we repurchased 163,214 shares for approximately $135,000 and 6,862 shares for approximately $15,000, respectively.

 

In July 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $5.0$5.0 million of our common stock.  These repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at prices the Company deems appropriate.  In 2015 and 2014, noNo repurchases of our common stock were made pursuant to this authorization.in 2017. During 2016, we repurchased 400,000 shares of common stock for approximately $1.0 million.  As of December 31, 2015 2017, we have $4.0approximately $3.0 million remaining on this authorization.authorization to repurchase our common stock.

 

During 2016, the Board declared two special dividends totaling $1.50 per share.5.  The first special dividend of $1.25 per share was distributed to shareholders on August 19, 2016 and the second special dividend of $.25 per share was distributed to shareholders on November 18, 2016. Approximately $36,000 in dividends payable relate to unvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2017.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Board adopted a Rights Agreement designed to protect the Company’s substantial net operating loss carryforwards. Under the Rights Agreement, company stockholders of record as of December 15, 2016 received one preferred share purchase right for each share of common stock they owned on such date. If a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 4.9% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock (subject to certain specified exceptions), the rights will become exercisable. The rights will also become exercisable if a person or group that already owns 4.9% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock acquires an additional 1% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Company entered into Amendment No.1, dated January 30,2017, to the Rights Agreement. This amendment amends the definition of Acquiring Person in the Rights Agreement to exclude any member of the Hale Group (Hale Partnership Fund, LP and certain affiliates that are parties to the agreement (Hale Agreement) dated January 30,2017 with the Company), provided that any purchases made by members of the Hale Group after December 5,2016 are made in compliance with Section 1(h) of the Hale Agreement.


If the rights become exercisable, all holders of rights, other than the person or group triggering the rights, will be entitled to purchase Company common stock at a 50% discount. Rights held by the person or group triggering the rights will become void and will not be exercisable. The rights have a de minimis fair value.

The rights trade with the Company’s common stock. The Rights Agreement and the rights will expire on December 5, 2019 (unless the Company’s NOLs are utilized prior to that date). The Board may amend the Rights Agreement in any way or redeem the rights at any time unless and until the rights are triggered.

The Rights Agreement includes a procedure for the Board to consider requests to exempt a particular transaction from triggering the exercisability of the rights under the Rights Agreement if the transaction (i) does not (x) create a significant risk of the Company’s NOLs being impaired or (y) constitute a default under the change-in-control covenant included in the Company’s credit facility or (ii) is otherwise in the best interests of the Company.

6.       Stock Based Compensation

 

The Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (Incentive Compensation Plan) provides for the granting of performance grants, performance shares, stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights to employees and certain service providers. Under this plan, the aggregate number of common shares that may be issued through awards of any form is 1.6 million. In addition, shares authorized under the 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan are also available for issuance under the Incentive Compensation Plan if they are unissued or subsequently expire, are forfeited or terminate unexercised. As of December 2017, there are 1.4 million shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans.

 

Stock Options      

The options are issued at market value on the date of grant and have a term of 10 years from the grant date. In general, employee grants vest ratably over a four to five year-year period and Director grants vest after one year. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the option and each vesting date. We have estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes pricing valuation model.

 

The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. No options were granted in 20152017 or 2014. 

F-14


Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

5.       Stock Based Compensation (continued)2016.

 

Stock option activity for the two years ended December 31, 2015, 2017, follows:

Number

Weighted-Average

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

of shares

Exercise Price

(in years)

(in thousands)

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

1,944,108

 

$

6.06

 

6.7

 

 

 

Forfeited

(465,786)

4.76

Expired

(106,968)

 

 

12.88

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

1,371,354

 

$

5.97

 

5.7

 

 

 

Forfeited

(184,798)

4.31

Expired

(20,364)

 

 

23.41

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

1,166,192

 

$

5.93

 

4.7

 

$

-

Exercisable at December 31, 2015

1,125,988

 

$

5.98

 

4.6

 

$

-

 

As of December 31, 2015, there was $65,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 1.0 years.

  

Number
of shares

  

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(in years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

(in

thousands)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

  1,166,192  $5.93   4.7     

Expired

  (36,610)  23.88         
                 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

  1,129,582  $5.35   3.8     
                 

Cancelled/Forfeited

  (258,706)  4.10         

Expired

  (44,294)  12.51         
                 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

  826,582  $5.35   2.8  $- 
                 

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

  826,582  $5.35   2.8  $- 

 

There were no stock options exercised in 20152017 and 2014.2016.


 

Restricted Stock

      

The restricted stock awards are accounted for as “non-vested equity shares” until the awards vest or are forfeited.  In general, restricted stock awards for employees are time vested or performance vested and for non-employee directors vest at the end of their current term on the Board.  The fair value of each share of restricted stock is the market price of our stock on the grant date.  The fair value of each time vested award is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the award date and the vesting date. Performance based awards are amortized into compensation expense based on the probability of meeting the performance criteria.   In 20152017 and 2014, 140,4422016,569,263 and 68,608221,745 of restricted stock awards vested and were released, respectively. 

F-15


Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

5.       Stock Based Compensation (continued)Included in the 2017 vesting was 491,607 shares related to the separation agreement with the former chief executive officer.

 

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock awards for the two years ended December 31, 2015:

2017:

Weighted-Average

 

Number
of shares

  

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

 

Number

Grant Date

of shares

 Fair Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

352,613

 

$

3.85

Forfeited

(140,448)

$

3.89

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

  534,933  $3.53 

Vested

(68,608)

 

$

3.80

  (221,745)  4.01 

Granted

400,691

$

3.71

  230,836   2.52 

 

 

 

 

        

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

544,248

$

3.74

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

(97,549)

$

3.45

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

  544,024  $2.89 

Vested

(140,442)

 

$

3.29

  (569,263)  2.20 

Granted

228,676

$

2.86

  458,081   1.26 

Cancelled/Forfeited

  (105,559)  2.83 

 

 

 

 

        

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

534,933

$

3.53

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

  327,283  $1.82 

 

As of December 31, 2015,2017, there was $667,000$22,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 2.31.3 years.

 

76..     Employee Benefits Plans

 

Defined Contribution Plan

 

We maintain a defined contribution plan covering substantially all of our employees and make discretionary matching and profit sharing contributions. The total plan cost, including employer contributions, was $34,000$40,000 in 20152017 and $273,000$16,000 in 2014.2016. Employer contributions were suspended to the plan beginning in 2015.

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

 

Effective January 1986, we established an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan for select key executives (the “Plan”). The Plan allowed participants to defer a portion of their compensation and, upon retirement, receive an annual payment for life with a minimum of 15 payments. The Plan was frozen to new participants in 1991 and there are no active employees in the plan. The Plan is accounted for in accordance with ASC 715,Pension Plans, which results in an accrued liability based on future benefit payments owed to each participant under the Plan, utilizing mortality assumptions and a high quality corporate bond discount rate.

 

Corporate-ownedCorporate-owned life insurance policies were purchased as a potential funding source for this Plan. The Company hashad the ability to borrow against these policies or cash them in at any time. The balance sheet reflectsreflected a cash surrender value asset of $22.3$22.3 million (net of $5.5$5.5 million in loans and accrued interest) at December 31, 2015 and $15.1 million (net of $11.1 million in loans and accrued interest) at December 31, 2014.  2015. Interest iswas paid on the borrowings at a rate of 13.13%, offset by a fixed rate of return of 12.63% on the borrowed portion of the cash surrender value of these policies, resulting in a net borrowing cost of 0.50%. The fixed return on the non-borrowed cash surrender value of these policies is 4%.  Policy loan payments In the first quarter of $13.72016, we liquidated the corporate-owned life insurance policies with cash surrender value of $28.1 million. We received $22.4 million in proceeds, net of outstanding loans and $5.5 million wereaccrued interest. The decision to liquidate was made in 2014 and 2015, respectively. 

F-16after continued review of the financial stability of Genworth Life Insurance Company, the issuer of the policies.

 



Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6.     Employee Benefits Plans (continued)

 

The growth in the cash surrender value of these policies, net of relatedrelated premiums and plan administrative costs, is included in operating income. Interest charges for policy loans are included in interest expenses below operating income. The growth in cash surrender value of these policies is not taxable unless the policies are cashed in, while the interest paid is deductible for tax purposes. While our $40.1The liquidation of these policies in 2016 created approximately $24.0 million in federaltaxable income which was offset by net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards make the tax benefits of these instruments less valuable today, these tax benefits would be beneficial in the future once the NOL’s were fully utilized.  carryforwards.   

 

The impact of the deferred compensation plan and corporate owned life insuranceinsurance policies impact on net income is as follows (in thousands):

2015

2014

Growth in cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies

$

1,701

 

$

2,836

Deferred compensation plan expenses

 

506

 

459

Operating income impact

 

1,195

 

 

2,377

Interest expense on loans against corporate-owned life insurance polices

 

948

 

2,881

Net income impact

$

247

 

$

(504)

Subsequent to year end, we made the decision to liquidate two of the outstanding life insurance policies with cash surrender value of $2.6 million.  We used $2.5 million of the proceeds to pay down outstanding loans and accrued interest, lowering our outstanding loan levels to $3.1 million and lowering interest expense to approximately $410,000 annually.

 

The annualized benefit in operating income and in net income if all policy loans and accrued interest were paid off would be approximately $500,000.

  

2017

  

2016

 

Growth in cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies

 $-  $301 

Deferred compensation plan expenses

  232   352 

Operating loss impact

  (232)  (51)

Interest expense on loans against corporate-owned life insurance polices

  -   109 

Net loss impact

 $(232) $(160)

 

The financial status of the deferred compensation plan based on actuarially valued benefits at December 31 follows (in thousands):

 

  

2017

  

2016

 

Change in benefit obligation:

        

Beginning benefit obligation

 $4,669  $4,749 

Interest cost

  148   160 

Actuarial loss (gain)

  138   210 

Benefits paid

  (450)  (450)

Ending benefit obligation

 $4,505  $4,669 

Change in plan assets:

        

Beginning fair value of plan assets

  -   - 

Employer contributions

  450   450 

Benefits paid

  (450)  (450)

Ending fair value of plan assets

  -   - 

Funded status

 $(4,505) $(4,669)

2015

2014

Change in benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning benefit obligation

$

5,412

$

4,952

Interest cost

 

182

 

 

189

Actuarial loss (gain)

(395)

721

Benefits paid

 

(450)

 

 

(450)

Ending benefit obligation

$

4,749

$

5,412

Change in plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning fair value of plan assets

-

-

Employer contributions

 

450

 

 

450

Benefits paid

 

(450)

 

(450)

Ending fair value of plan assets

 

-

 

 

-

Funded status

$

(4,749)

$

(5,412)

F-17


Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6.     Employee Benefits Plans (continued)

 

Amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet (in thousands):

2015

2014

 

2017

  

2016

 

Current liabilities

$

(448)

 

$

(448)

 $(404) $(450)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(4,301)

 

(4,964)

  (4,101)  (4,219)

Total

$

(4,749)

 

$

(5,412)

 $(4,505) $(4,669)

 

Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss (in thousands):

  

2017

  

2016

 

Net loss

 $1,806  $1,752 

 

 

2015

 

2014

Net loss

$

1,614

 

$

2,102


 

Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)loss (in thousands):     


 

2015

 

2014

 

2017

  

2016

 

Net periodic benefit cost:

 

 

 

 

 

        

Interest cost

$

182

$

189

 $148  $160 

Amortization of net loss

 

93

 

 

61

  84   72 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

275

$

250

 $232  $232 

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

Net loss (gain)

$

(395)

$

721

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income:

        

Net loss

 $138  $210 

Amortization of net loss

 

(93)

 

 

(61)

  (84)  (72)

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(488)

 

660

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)

$

(213)

 

$

910

Total recognized in other comprehensive loss

  54   138 

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss

 $286  $370 

 

Approximately $72,000$95,000 in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss is expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during 2016.2018.

 

The assumptions used to determine the plan’splan’s financial status and postretirement benefit cost:

 

2015

2014

Discount rate for funded status

3.55%

 

3.50%

Discount rate for benefit cost

3.50%

4.00%

2017

2016

Discount rate for funded status

3.15%3.50%

Discount rate for benefit cost

3.50%3.55%

 

Estimated future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands):

2016

$

448

2017

440

2018

 

392

2019

380

2020

 

370

2021 - 2025

1,608

Estimated contributions for 2016

$

448

F-18

 


2018

  $404 

2019

   395 

2020

   384 

2021

   368 

2022

   355 
2023-2027  1,514 
       

Estimated contributions for 2018

 $404 

 

Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6.     Employee Benefits Plans (continued)

Supplemental retirement plan and other postretirement benefits

 

Benefits under the supplemental retirement ceased to accrue after 1995.Our postretirement health care benefits were terminated for current employees effective January 1, 2010. Prior to this termination, we provided health care benefits to eligible retired employees between the ages of 55 and 65 and provide life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees from age 55 until death.

 

The financial status of the plans at December 31 follows (in thousands):

 

  

Supplemental Retirement Plan

  

Other Postretirement Benefits

 
  

2017

  

2016

  

2017

  

2016

 

Change in benefit obligation:

                

Beginning benefit obligation

 $1,879  $1,952  $710  $827 

Interest cost

  64   68   23   23 

Plan participants’ contributions

  -   -   51   46 

Actuarial (gain) loss

  68   14   61   (51)

Benefits paid

  (156)  (155)  (152)  (135)

Ending benefit obligation

 $1,855  $1,879  $693  $710 

Change in plan assets:

                

Beginning fair value of plan assets

  -   -   -   - 

Employer contributions

  155   155   101   89 

Plan participants’ contributions

  -   -   51   46 

Benefits paid

  (155)  (155)  (152)  (135)

Ending fair value of plan assets

  -   -   -   - 

Funded status

 $(1,855) $(1,879) $(693) $(710)

Supplemental Retirement Plan

Other Postretirement Benefits

2015

2014

2015

2014

Change in benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning benefit obligation

$

2,129

$

1,937

$

932

$

1,066

Interest cost

 

72

 

 

74

 

 

26

 

 

34

Plan participants’ contributions

50

57

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

(93)

 

 

291

 

 

(9)

 

 

1

Benefits paid

 

(156)

 

(173)

 

(172)

 

(226)

Ending benefit obligation

$

1,952

 

$

2,129

 

$

827

 

$

932

Change in plan assets:

Beginning fair value of plan assets

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

Employer contributions

156

173

122

169

Plan participants’ contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

57

Benefits paid

 

(156)

 

(173)

 

(172)

 

(226)

Ending fair value of plan assets

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

Funded status

$

(1,952)

$

(2,129)

$

(827)

$

(932)


 

Amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet(in thousands) (in thousands):

Supplemental Retirement Plan

Other Postretirement Benefits

 

Supplemental Retirement Plan

  

Other Postretirement

Benefits

 

2015

2014

2015

2014

 

2017

  

2016

  

2017

  

2016

 

Current liabilities

$

(155)

 

$

(158)

 

$

(92)

 

$

(98)

 $(154) $(155) $(88) $(88)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(1,797)

 

(1,971)

 

(735)

 

(834)

  (1,701)  (1,724)  (605)  (622)

Total

$

(1,952)

 

$

(2,129)

 

$

(827)

 

$

(932)

 $(1,855) $(1,879) $(693) $(710)

 

Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands)loss (in thousands):

Supplemental Retirement Plan

Other Postretirement Benefits

2015

2014

2015

2014

Net loss (gain)

$

704

 

$

832

 

$

(149)

 

$

(152)

Prior service cost (credit)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(92)

Total

$

704

 

$

832

 

$

(149)

 

$

(244)

  

Supplemental Retirement Plan

  

Other Postretirement

Benefits

 
  

2017

  

2016

  

2017

  

2016

 

Net loss (gain)

 $721  $686  $(111) $(182)

F-19


Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6.     Employee Benefits Plans (continued)

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income (loss) (in thousands):

  

Supplemental Retirement Plan

  

Other Postretirement

Benefits

 
  

2017

  

2016

  

2017

  

2016

 

Net periodic benefit cost:

                

Interest cost

 $64  $68  $22  $23 

Amortization of net loss (gain)

  33   32   (10)  (17)

Net periodic benefit cost

 $97  $100  $12  $6 

Supplemental Retirement Plan

Other Postretirement Benefits

2015

2014

2015

2014

Net periodic benefit cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest cost

$

72

$

74

$

26

$

34

Amortization of net loss (gain)

 

36

 

 

24

 

 

(13)

 

 

(14)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

-

 

-

 

(92)

 

(154)

Net periodic benefit cost (income)

$

108

 

$

98

 

$

(79)

 

$

(134)

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss (gain)

$

(93)

$

291

$

(9)

$

1

Amortization of net (loss) gain

 

(36)

 

 

(24)

 

 

13

 

 

14

Amortization of prior service cost

 

-

 

-

 

92

 

154

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

$

(129)

 

$

267

 

$

96

 

$

169

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)

$

(21)

$

365

$

17

$

35

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):

                

Net loss (gain)

 $68  $14  $61  $(51)

Amortization of net (loss) gain

  (33)  (32)  10   17 

Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income

 $35  $(18) $71  $(34)

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (loss) income

 $132  $82  $83  $(28)

 

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during 20162018 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Supplemental Retirement Plan

 

Other Postretirement Benefits

Net loss (gain)

$

32

 

$

(9)

  

Supplemental Retirement Plan

  

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

 

Net loss (gain)

 $38  $(7)

 

The assumptions used to determine the plan’splan’s financial status and postretirement benefit cost:

 

Supplemental Retirement Plan

Other Postretirement Benefits

2015

2014

2015

2014

Discount rate for funded status

 

3.65%

 

 

3.50%

 

 

3.20%

 

 

3.10%

Discount rate for benefit cost

3.50%

4.00%

3.10%

3.50%

Health care cost assumed trend rate for next year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.50%

 

 

7.00%

Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to

5.50%

5.50%

Year that the rate reaches the rate it is assumed to remain at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2018

F-20

 


Supplemental Retirement

Plan

Other Postretirement

Benefits

2017

2016

2017

2016

Discount rate for funded status

3.20%3.55%2.95%3.20%

Discount rate for benefit cost

3.55%3.65%3.20%3.20%

Health care cost assumed trend rate for next year

6.00%

Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to

5.50%

Year that the rate reaches the rate it is assumed to remain at

2018

 

Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6.     Employee Benefits Plans (continued)


 

An increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate of one percentage point in each future year would affecthave no effect on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2015 by approximately $140 and the2017 or annual postretirement benefit cost by approximately $4.cost.

 

Estimated future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands):

 

Supplemental Retirement Plan

Other Postretirement Benefits

   

Supplemental

Retirement Plan

  

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

 

Estimated net future benefit payments:

 

 

 

 

Estimated net future benefit payments:

        

2016

$

155

$

92

2017

 

152

 

 

91

2018

149

83

2018

  $154  $88 

2019

 

146

 

 

80

2019

   151   84 

2020

143

76

2020

   147   79 

2021 - 2025

 

661

 

 

307

Estimated contributions for 2016

$

155

$

92

2021

2021

   144   73 

2022

2022

   140   67 
2023-2027  631   246 
          

Estimated contributions for 2018

Estimated contributions for 2018

 $154  $88 

 

The accrued liabilities relating to thesethese plans are included in accrued salaries, wages and benefits and in long-term liabilities.

 

 

7.      Restructuring and Related Charges

As of December 31, 2015, our lease for warehouse space in Stanleytown, Virginia expired.  Over the last few years we have continually evaluated our overall warehousing and distribution requirements and began reducing our utilization of this facility in 2012 and exited it in 2014.  As a result, we took a charge to cost of goods sold for the remaining future lease obligations of $354,000 in 2014 when we completely exited the facility.

During 2013, we recorded $770,000 in restructuring charges in selling, general and administrative expenses for severance and relocation costs associated with the strategic decision to consolidate our corporate office and High Point showroom into a single multi-purpose facility in High Point, North Carolina.

Restructuring accrual activity for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 follows (in thousands):

Severance and other

Lease

 termination costs

 Obligations

Total

Accrual January 1, 2014

$

169

 

$

488

 

$

657

Charges (credits) to expense

(54)

354

300

Cash Payments

 

(115)

 

 

(362)

 

 

(477)

Accrual December 31, 2014

-

480

480

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash payments

 

-

 

(480)

 

(480)

Accrual December 31, 2015

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

F-21


 

Table of Contents

8STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

8.         Discontinued Operations

During the second quarter of 2014, we concluded that revenue on our Young America product line remained below the level needed to reach profitability and that the time frame needed to assure sustainable profitability was longer than we felt was economically justified.  Therefore, we made the decision to cease manufacturing operations at our Robbinsville, North Carolina facility and sell the related assets of this facility.Manufacturing operations were ceased in the third quarter of 2014 and as a result this product line was reflected as a discontinued operation pursuant to the provisions of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (ASU 2014-08) for all periods presented.

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes, comprised the following (in thousands):

2015

2014

Net sales

$

553

 

$

19,193

Cost of sales

772

37,805

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

(144)

 

 

3,392

Other income

 

64

 

-

Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

(11)

 

 

(22,004)

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

-

 

-

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

$

(11)

 

$

(22,004)

Loss from discontinued operations includes accelerated depreciation and amortization, write-down of inventories and other assets, severance and other termination costs, operating losses related to final manufacturing production and loss on sale of assets.  During the fourth quarter of 2014, we completed the sale of all property, plant and equipment for $5.5 million, and in 2015, we completed the sale and distribution of the remaining discontinued product.

Net (liabilities) assets for discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):

December 31,

December 31,

2015

2014

Accounts receivable, net

$

-

 

$

695

Inventory

 

-

 

678

Total assets

 

-

 

 

1,373

Accounts payable and other liabilities

 

13

 

93

Net (liabilities) assets

$

(13)

 

$

1,280

9.       Income for Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA)

 

The CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (Customs) for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the United States through September 30, 2007 to qualified domestic producers. Distribution for 2012, 2013In 2017 and 2014 were withheld by Customs until pending ligation had been exhausted.  On October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court denied two of three of the Non-Supporting Producers’ petitions for certiorari review, and on December 15, 2014, the Supreme Court denied the third petition for review.  Accordingly, in March 2015, Customs began distributing funds withheld from distribution and our allocated share of these funds totaled $4.9 million.  In addition,2016, we received $412,000$0.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in December 2015 in normal distributiondistributions of funds collected on antidumping duty orders entering the United States prior to September 2007.

F-22

 


Table of Contents

9STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

10..       Commitments and Contingencies

 

Our leased facilities include warehouse and distribution space, showroom and office space and certain technology equipment. These leases have varying terms up to ten years. Rental expensesexpense charged to operations were $2.9was $2.4 million and $2.7$3.0 million in 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2015,2017, the future minimum lease payments for our current operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

 

Total

 

Total

 

2016

$

1,196

2017

783

2018

 

835

2019

863

2020

 

740

2018

 $1,370 

2019

  1,273 

2020

  1,302 

2021

  1,332 

2022

  1,232 

Thereafter

 

1,143

  299 

Total minimum lease payments

$

5,560

 $6,808 

 

We currently have letters of credit to cover estimated exposures, most notably with workman’s compensation claims. This agreement requires us to maintain a compensating balance with the issuer for the amounts outstanding. We currently have letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $663,000.$631,000. The compensating balance amount is reflected as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.

 


In the normal course of business, we are involved in claims and lawsuits, none of which currently, in management’smanagement’s opinion, will have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-23

 


1Table of Contents

STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

11.0.      Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

 ��

  (in thousands, except per share data) 

2017 Quarters:

 

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

 

Net Sales

 $11,190  $11,615  $10,427  $11,946 

Gross profit

  2,237   2,732   2,333   (2,466)
                 

Net (loss) income

 $(416) $14  $(305) $(7,002) (1)
                 

 

Net loss per share (2):

                

Basic

 $(.03) $-  $(.02) $(.49)

Diluted

 $(.03) $-  $(.02) $(.49)

2016 Quarters:

 

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

 
Net Sales $11,683  $12,053  $11,036  $9,802 
Gross profit  2,541   2,062   1,835   1,976 
                 

Net loss

 $(1,485) $(1,392) $(2,080) $(301) (1)

 

Net loss per share (2:

                

Basic

 $(.10) $(.10) $(.15) $(.02)

Diluted

 $(.10) $(.10) $(.15) $(.02)

(1)

Includes proceeds received from the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net of taxes, of $0.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 and $1.1 million in fourth quarter of 2016.

(2)

The sum of individual quarterly net loss per share may not agree to the total for the year due to each period’s computation being based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

2015 Quarters:

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Net Sales

$

14,672

 

$

15,133

 

$

13,760

 

$

13,799

Gross profit

2,983

3,839

3,410

3,453

Net income from continuing operations

 

2,773(1)

 

 

1,268(1)

 

 

391

 

 

919(1)

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

(118)

35

74

(2)

Net income

$

2,655(1)

 

$

1,303(1)

 

$

465

 

$

917(1)

Basic earnings per share (2):

Net income from continuing operations

$

.20

 

$

.09

 

$

.03

 

$

.06

Net loss from discontinued operations

(.01)

  -

  -

  -

Net Income

$

.19

 

$

.09

 

$

.03

 

$

.06

Diluted earnings per share (2):

Net income from continuing operations

$

.19

 

$

.09

 

$

.03

 

$

.06

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

(.01)

  -

  -

  -

Net income

$

.18

 

$

.09

 

$

.03

 

$

.06

2014 Quarters:

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Net Sales

$

14,642

 

$

16,033

 

$

13,928

 

$

16,020

Gross profit

2,938

2,725

2,624

3,726

Net loss from continuing operations

 

(1,725)

 

 

(2,197)(3)

 

 

(1,438)

 

 

(2,528)

Net loss from discontinued operations

(2,901)

(17,303)

(1,118)

(682)

Net loss

$

(4,626)

 

$

(19,500)(3)

 

$

(2,556)

 

$

(3,210)

Basic loss per share (2):

Net loss from continuing operations

$

(.12)

 

$

(.16)

 

$

(.10)

 

$

(.18)

Net loss from discontinued operations

(.21)

(1.22)

(.08)

(.05)

Net loss

$

(.33)

 

$

(1.38)

 

$

(.18)

 

$

(.23)

Diluted loss per share (2):

Net loss income from continuing operations

$

(.12)

 

$

(.16)

 

$

(.10)

 

$

(.18)

Loss from discontinued operations

(.21)

(1.22)

(.08)

(.05)

Net loss

$

(.33)

 

$

(1.38)

 

$

(.18)

 

$

(.23)

11.       Subsequent Events

 

On March 2, 2018, we sold substantially all of our assets (the “(1)Asset Sale”) to Churchill Downs LLC (“Buyer”), pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2017, as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated January 22, 2017 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). As consideration for the Asset Sale, Buyer paid a purchase price consisting of cash in the amount of approximately $10.8 million (of which approximately $1.3 million was used to pay the outstanding amount under our credit agreement), a subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of approximately $7.4 million, and a 5% equity interest in Buyer’s post-closing ultimate parent company, Churchill Downs Holdings Ltd., a British Virgin Islands business company. Buyer also Includes proceeds receivedassumed substantially all of our liabilities.

On March 2, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to HG Holdings, Inc.  The amendment became effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 2, 2018.

On March 2, 2018, in connection with the Asset Sale, we terminated our credit agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) and the related security agreement.

On February 5, 2018, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina against us, our directors and certain former directors in connection with the Asset Sale. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that we violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by omitting certain material information from the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, net of taxes, of $3.8 million in the first quarter, $1.1 million in the second quarter and $407,000 in the fourth quarter of 2015.

(2)    The sum of individual quarterly net income per share may not agreeproxy statement relating to the total forAsset Sale. The complaint sought, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the year dueconsummation of the Asset Sale until disclosure of the material information allegedly omitted from the proxy statement, rescission of the Asset Purchase Agreement to each period’s computation being basedthe extent already implemented, and the award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees and certain other damages. While we believed the claims were without merit, we determined to provide additional disclosure in a supplement to the proxy statement in order to alleviate the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent with litigation.  We reached an agreement with the plaintiff regarding our additional disclosures and the lawsuit was dismissed on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.March 12,2018. 

(3)    Includes a charge of $354,000 for the future lease obligation for a leased facility no longer utilized.


F-24

 



 

Table of Contents

HG HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.)

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For each of the Two Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20152017

(in thousands)

 

           

Column A

Column B

Column C

Column D

Column E

 

Column B

  

Column C

  

Column D

  

Column E

 
     

Charged

         

Balance at

(Credited)

Balance at

 

Balance at

  

(Credited)

      

Balance at

 

Beginning

to Costs &

End

 

Beginning

  

to Costs &

      

End

 

Descriptions

of Period

Expenses

Deductions

of Period

 

of Period

  

Expenses

  

Deductions

  

of Period

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

                

Doubtful receivables

$

189

$

93

$

15(a)

$

267

 $117 $71  $92(a) $96 

Discounts, returns, and allowances

 

 

186

 

 

(49)(b)

 

 

-

 

 

137

  155  

(48)

(b)  -   107 

$

375

$

44

$

15

$

404

 $272  $23  $92  $203 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

 

$

21,724

 

$

-

 

$

2,530

 

$

19,194

 $12,588  $-  $2,857  $9,731 
                

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

                

Doubtful receivables

$

112

$

171

$

94(a)

$

189

 $267 $91  $241(a) $117 

Discounts, returns, and allowances

 

 

158

 

 

28(b)

 

 

-

 

 

186

  137  

18

(b)  -   155 

$

270

$

199

$

94

$

375

 $404  $109  $241  $272 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

 

$

10,727

 

$

10,997

 

$

-

 

$

21,724

 $19,194  $-  $6,606  $12,588 
(a) Uncollectible receivables written-off, net of recoveries.
(b) Represents net increase (decrease) in the reserve.

(a) Uncollectible receivables written-off, net of recoveries.

(b) Represents net increase (decrease) in the reserve.

 

 

S-1