Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ý☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 or
¨☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission File Number 001-35243
 
SUNCOKE ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
90-0640593
Delaware
90-0640593
(State of or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
1011 Warrenville Road, Suite 600
Lisle, Illinois
60532
(Address of principal executive offices)(zip code)
1011 Warrenville Road, Suite 600
Lisle, Illinois 60532
(630) 824-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (630) 824-1000code)
____________________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Sectionsection 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par valueSXCNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filerý
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company☐
Large accelerated filerýAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  Yes ☒No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨☐    No  ý
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock on June 30, 2021 (based upon the June 30, 2018 closing price of $13.40$7.14 on June 30, 2021, the last trading day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, on the New York Stock Exchange) held by non-affiliates was approximately $863,299,596.$589,390,492.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 8, 201918, 2022 was 64,756,093.83,111,938.
Portions of the SunCoke Energy, Inc. 20192022 definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2018,2021, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.



1
Table of Contents



SUNCOKE ENERGY, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
116
Risk Factors
15
Item 1B.
3328
3328
3429
3429
3530
3731
3832
5746
5847
11082
11082
11083
83
11183
11183
11183
11183
11383
11484


Table of Contents


PART I
Business
88
89



Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1.Business
Overview
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (“SunCoke Energy,” “SunCoke,” “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us”) is the largest independent producer of high-quality coke in the Americas, as measured by tons of coke produced each year, and has over 55more than 60 years of coke production experience. Coke is a principal raw material in the blast furnace steelmaking process and is produced by heating metallurgical coal in a refractory oven, which releases certain volatile components from the coal, thus transforming the coal into coke. We also provideown and operate a logistics business that provides handling and/or mixing services to steel, coke (including some of our domestic cokemaking facilities), electric utility, coal producing and other manufacturing based customers.
Our consolidated financial statements include SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), a publicly-traded master limited partnership. As of December 31, 2018, we owned the general partner of the Partnership, which owns a 2.0 percent general partner interest and incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) in the Partnership, and owned a 60.4 percent limited partner interest in the Partnership. The remaining 37.6 percent interest in the Partnership was held by public unitholders.
On February 5, 2019, the Company and the Partnership announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement whereby SunCoke will acquire all outstanding common units of the Partnership not already owned by SunCoke in a stock-for-unit merger transaction (the “Simplification Transaction”). Pursuant to the terms of this agreement (“Merger Agreement”), the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will receive 1.40 SunCoke common shares plus a fraction of a SunCoke common share, based on a ratio as further described in the Merger Agreement, for each Partnership common unit. On behalf of the Partnership and its public unitholders, the terms of the Simplification Transaction were negotiated, reviewed and approved by the conflicts committee of the Board of Directors of the Partnership's general partner, which consisted solely of independent directors. The transaction was approved by the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership and the Board of Directors of SunCoke. 
Following completion of the Simplification Transaction, the Partnership will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of SunCoke, the Partnership's common units will cease to be publicly traded and the Partnership's IDRs will be eliminated.  The Simplification Transaction is expected to close late in the second quarter of 2019 or early in the third quarter of 2019, subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval by holders of a majority of the outstanding SunCoke common shares and Partnership common units, as well as customary regulatory approvals. SunCoke indirectly owns the majority of the Partnership common units, which is sufficient to approve the transaction on behalf of the holders of Partnership common units.
Incorporated in Delaware since 2010 and headquartered in Lisle, Illinois, we became a publicly-traded company in 2011 and our stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SXC.”


1
Table of Contents


Cokemaking Operations
The following table sets forth information about our cokemaking facilities:
Facility Location Customer 
Year of
Start Up
 
Contract
Expiration
 
Number of
Coke Ovens
 
Annual Cokemaking Nameplate
Capacity
(thousands of tons)
 Use of Waste Heat
Owned and Operated:              
Jewell Vansant, Virginia AM USA 1962 December 2020 142 720 Partially used for thermal coal drying
Indiana Harbor East Chicago, Indiana AM USA 1998 October 2023 268 1,220 Heat for power generation
Haverhill Phase I Franklin Furnace, Ohio AM USA 2005 December 2020 100 550 Process steam
Haverhill Phase II Franklin Furnace,  Ohio AK Steel 2008 December 2021 100 550 Power generation
Granite City Granite City, Illinois U.S. Steel 2009 December 2025 120 650 Steam for power generation
Middletown(1)
 Middletown, Ohio AK Steel 2011 December 2032 100 550 Power generation
Total         830 4,240  
Operated:              
Vitória Vitória, Brazil ArcelorMittal Brazil 2007 January 2023 320 1,700 Steam for power generation
Total         1,150 5,940  
(1)Cokemaking nameplate capacity represents stated capacity for production of blast furnace coke. Middletown production and sales volumes are based on “run of oven” capacity, which includes both blast furnace coke and small coke. Using the stated capacity, Middletown nameplate capacity on a “run of oven” basis is approximately 578 thousand tons per year.
We are a technological leader in cokemaking. We have designed, developed, built, own and operate five cokemaking facilities in the United States (“U.S.”) with collective nameplate capacity to produce approximately 4.2 million tons of blast furnace coke per year. Additionally, we have designed and operate one cokemaking facility in Brazil under licensing and operating agreements on behalf of ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A. ("ArcelorMittal Brazil”), which has approximately 1.7 million tons of annual cokemaking capacity. Our core business model is predicated on providing steelmakers an alternative to investing capital in their own captive coke production facilities. We direct our marketing efforts principally towards steelmaking customers that require coke for use in their blast furnaces.
Our cokemaking ovens utilize efficient, modern heat recovery technology designed to combust the coal’s volatile components liberated during the cokemaking process and use the resulting heat to create steam or electricity for sale. This differs from by-product cokemaking, which repurposes the coal’s liberated volatile components for other uses. We have constructed the only greenfield cokemaking facilities in the U.S. in approximately 30 years and are the only North American coke producer that utilizes heat recovery technology in the cokemaking process.
We believe our advanced heat recovery cokemaking process has numerous advantages over by-product cokemaking, including producing higher quality coke, using waste heat to generate derivative energy for resale and reducing the environmental impact. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 specifically directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to evaluate our heat recovery coke oven technology as a basis for establishing Maximum Achievable Control Technology (“MACT”) standards for new cokemaking facilities. In addition, each of the four cokemaking facilities that we have built since 1990 has either met or exceeded the applicable Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”), or Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (“LAER”) standards, as applicable, set forth by the EPA for cokemaking facilities at that time. We have constructed the only greenfield cokemaking facilities in the U.S. in over 30 years and are the only North American coke producer that utilizes heat recovery technology in the cokemaking process.


2
TableOur Middletown facility and the second phase of Contents


our Haverhill facility, or Haverhill II, have cogeneration plants that use the hot flue gas created by the cokemaking process to generate electricity, which either is sold into the regional power market or to Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Holding Corporation pursuant to energy sales agreements. Our Granite City facility and the first phase of our Haverhill facility, or Haverhill I, have steam generation facilities, which use hot flue gas from the cokemaking process to produce steam for sale to customers pursuant to steam supply and purchase agreements. Granite City sells steam to United States Steel Corporation ("U.S. Steel") and Haverhill I provides steam, at minimal cost, to Altivia Petrochemicals, LLC. Our
1
Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information about our cokemaking facilities:
FacilityLocationYear of
Start Up		Use of Waste HeatNumber of
Coke Ovens
Annual Cokemaking Nameplate
Capacity(1)
(thousands of tons)
Customer(3)
Contract ExpirationContract Volume
(thousands of tons)
Owned and Operated:
Middletown(2)
Middletown, Ohio2011Power generation100550Cliffs SteelDecember 2032Capacity
Haverhill IIFranklin Furnace,  Ohio2008Power generation100550Cliffs SteelJune 2025Capacity
Granite CityGranite City, Illinois2009Steam for power generation120650U.S. SteelDecember 2024Capacity
Indiana HarborEast Chicago, Indiana1998Heat for power generation2681,220Cliffs SteelOctober 2023Capacity
JewellVansant, Virginia1962Partially used for thermal coal drying142720
Cliffs Steel
Algoma Steel(4)
December 2025
December 2026		400 / 150
Haverhill IFranklin Furnace, Ohio2005Process steam100550
Total8304,240
Operated:
VitóriaVitória, Brazil2007Steam for power generation3201,700ArcelorMittal BrazilJanuary 2023Capacity
Total1,1505,940
(1)Cokemaking nameplate capacity represents stated capacity for production of blast furnace coke equivalent production.
(2)The Middletown facilitycoke sales agreement provides for coke sales on a “run of oven” basis, which includes both blast furnace coke and the second phasesmall coke. Middletown nameplate capacity on a “run of our Haverhill facility, or Haverhill II, have cogeneration plants that use the hot flue gas created by the cokemaking process to generate electricity, which eitheroven” basis is sold into the regional power market or to AK578 thousand tons per year.
(3)Contracted customers include Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Holding Corporation and Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC, both subsidiaries of Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and collectively referred to as "Cliffs Steel," United States Steel Corporation ("AKU.S. Steel") pursuant, and Algoma Steel Inc. ("Algoma Steel").
(4)Under the long-term, take-or-pay agreement with Cliffs Steel, Jewell and Haverhill I supplied a combined 800 thousand tons in 2021 and will supply a combined 400 thousand tons annually for 2022 through 2025. Additionally, the long-term, take-pay-agreement between Haverhill I and Algoma Steel provides for coke supply to energy sales agreements.shift to Jewell.
Long-term, Take-or-Pay Agreements
Our core business model is predicated on providing steelmakers an alternative to investing capital in their own captive coke production facilities. We direct our marketing efforts principally towards steelmaking customers that require coke for use in their blast furnaces. Substantially all our coke sales are largely made pursuant to long-term, take-or-pay agreements, primarily with ArcelorMittal USA LLC and/or its affiliates (“AM USA”), AKtwo customers in the U.S.: Cliffs Steel and U.S. Steel. Additionally, SunCoke entered into a five year take-or-pay agreement with Algoma Steel who are threebeginning in 2022, with average sales of the largestapproximately 150 thousand tons of blast furnace steelmakers in North America, each of which individually accounts for greater than ten percent ofcoke per year, further diversifying our consolidated revenues. The take-or-pay provisionscustomer base. These agreements require us to produce the contracted volumes of coke and require our customers to purchase such volumes of coke up to a specified tonnage or pay the contract price for any tonnage they elect not to take. As a result, our ability to produce the contracted coke volume is a key determinant of our profitability. We generally do not have significant spot coke sales since ourOur domestic capacity is largely consumed by these long-term contracts; accordingly,agreements. Accordingly, spot prices for coke do not generally affecthave a limited effect on our revenues. To date, our coke customers have satisfied their obligations under these agreements.
Our long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements have an average remaining term of approximately six years and contain pass-through provisions for costs we incur in the cokemaking process, including coal and coal procurement costs, subject to meeting contractual coal-to-coke yields, operating and maintenance expenses, costs related to the transportation of coke to our customers, taxes (other than income taxes) and costs associated with changes in regulation. When targeted coal-to-coke yields are achieved, the price of coal is not a significant determining factor in the profitability of these facilities, although it does affect our revenue and cost of sales for these facilities in approximately equal amounts. However, to the extent that the actual coal-to-coke yields are less than the contractual standard, we are responsible for the cost of the excess coal used in the cokemaking process. Conversely, to the
2
Table of Contents

extent our actual coal-to-coke yields are higher than the contractual standard, we realize gains. As coal prices increase, the benefits associated with favorable coal-to-coke yields also increase. These features of our coke sales agreements reduce our exposure to variability in coal price changes and inflationary costs over the remaining terms of these agreements. The coal component of the Jewell coke price is typicallyhas historically been fixed annually for each calendar year based on the weighted-average contract price of third-party coal purchases at our Haverhill facility applicable to AM USACliffs Steel coke sales. Beginning in 2022, Jewell coal purchases will be passed through at actual cost rather than at the price of Haverhill's coal, consistent with our other long-term, take-or-pay agreements.
Our coke prices include both an operating cost component and a fixed fee component. Operating costs under twothree of our coke sales agreements are fixed subject to an annual adjustment based on an inflation index. Under our other four coke sales agreements, operating costs are passed through to the respective customers subject to an annually negotiated budget, in some cases subject to a cap annually adjusted for inflation, and we share any difference in costs from the budgeted amounts with our customers. In 2018, the operating cost component of our contract at Indiana Harbor changed to an annually negotiated budget from a fixed recovery per ton mechanism, which had a favorable impact on our results. Accordingly, actual operating costs in excess of caps or budgets can have a significant impact on the profitability of all of our domestic cokemaking facilities. The fixed fee component for each ton of coke sold to the customer is determined at the time the coke sales agreement is signed and is effective for the term of each sales agreement. The fixed fee is intended to provide an adequate return on invested capital and may differ based on investment levels and other considerations. The actual return on invested capital at any facility is based on the fixed fee per ton and favorable or unfavorable performance on pass-through cost items.
TheFoundry and Export Coke
In order to further diversify our business and customer base, we have entered the foundry coke market. Foundry coke is a high-quality grade of coke that is used at foundries to melt iron and various metals in cupola furnaces, which is further processed via casting or molding into products used in various industries such as construction, transportation and industrial products. We began producing and selling foundry coke on a commercial scale in 2021. We also began selling blast furnace coke into the export coke market in 2021, utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for our long-term, take-or-pay agreements. Foundry coke sales agreementare generally made under annual agreements with our customers for an agreed upon price and energy sales agreement with AK Steel at our Haverhill facility are subject to early termination by AK Steel only if AK Steel meets both of the following two criteria: (1) AK Steel permanently shuts down operation of the iron producing portion of its Ashland Works Plant and (2) AK Steel hasdo not acquired or begun construction of a new blast furnace in the U.S. to replace, in whole or in part, the Ashland Works Plant iron production capacity. If AK Steel were able to satisfy both criteria and chose to elect early termination, AK Steel must provide two years advance notice of the termination. During the two-year notice period, AK Steel must continue to perform in full under the terms of thecontain take-or-pay volume commitments. Export coke sales agreement and energy sales agreement. On January 28, 2019, AK Steel announced its intention to permanently close its Ashland Works Plant byare generally made on a spot basis at the end of 2019. Were the Ashland Works Plant to permanently shut down, we believe AK Steel has not and would not satisfy the second criterion. No other coke sales agreement has an early termination clause.current market price.

Market Discussion

3
Table of Contents


WhileU.S. steel production utilization rates improved throughout 2021, benefiting our steelmaking customers continuecustomers. Utilization increased from 75 percent in January 2021 to operate82 percent in December 2021. Additionally, an environment that is challenged byincrease in global overcapacity, throughout 2018 theysteel demand along with global coke trade imbalance has benefited from improved steel selling prices, favorable U.S. trade policies, including imported U.S. steel tariffs signed into order during the first half of 2018, and solid end market demand. Imports of finished steel have decreased from 27 percent of U.S. steel consumption in 2017 to approximately 23 percent of U.S. steel consumption in 2018. U.S. Steel restarted both of the blast furnaces at its Granite City Works facility during 2018.our export coke sales.
Brazil Operations
Our Brazil cokemaking operations are located in Vitoria,Vitória, Brazil, where we operate our ArcelorMittal Brazil cokemaking facility for a Brazilian subsidiary of ArcelorMittal S.A. Revenues from our Brazilian cokemaking facility are derived from licensing and operating fees, which include a fixed annual licensing fee, a licensing fee based upon the level of production required by our customer and full pass-through of the operating costs of the facility.
Logistics Operations
Our logistics business consists of Convent Marine Terminal (“CMT”("CMT"), Kanawha River Terminal (“KRT”("KRT"), SunCoke Lake Terminal (“Lake Terminal”) and Dismal River Terminal (“DRT”)., and has the collective capacity to mix and/or transload more than 40 million tons of coal and other aggregates annually and has storage capacity of more than 3 million tons. CMT is located in Convent, Louisiana, is one of the largest export terminals on the U.S. Gulf Coast. CMT provideswith strategic access to seaborne markets for coal and other industrial materials. Supporting low-cost Illinois basin coal producers, theThe terminal provides loading and unloading services and has direct rail access and the current capability to transload 15 million tons annually with its top of the line ship loader. The facility is supported by long-term contracts with volume commitments covering 10 million tons of its current capacityserves coal mining customers as well as 350 thousand liquid tons. The facility also serves other merchant business, including aggregates (crushed stone), petroleum coke and petroleum coke.iron ore. CMT's efficient barge unloading capabilities complement its rail and truck offerings and provide the terminal with the ability to transload and mix a significantly broader variety of materials, including coal, petroleum coke and other materials from barges at its dock. KRT is a leading metallurgical and thermal coal mixing and handling terminal service provider with collective capacity to mix and transload 25 million tons annually through its operations in Ceredo and Belle, West Virginia. Lake Terminal is located in East Chicago, Indiana and providesDRT provide coal handling and mixing services to ourSunCoke's Indiana Harbor cokemaking operations. DRT was formed in 2016 to accommodate ourand Jewell cokemaking facility in Vansant, Virginia in its direct procurement of third-party coal.operations, respectively.
Our logistics business has the collective capacity to mix and/or transload more than 40 million tons of coal and other aggregates annually and has storage capacity of approximately 3 million tons. Our terminals act as intermediaries between our customers and end users by providing transloading and mixing services. Materials are transported in numerous ways, including rail, truck, barge or ship. We do not take possession of materials handled but instead derive our revenues by providing handling and/or mixing services to our customers on a per ton
3
Table of Contents

basis. Revenues are recognized when services are provided as defined by customer contracts. See Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our revenue recognition policies. Logistics services provided to our domestic cokemaking facilities are provided under contracts with terms equivalent to those of arm's-length transactions.
The financial performance of our logistics business is substantially dependent upon a limited number of customers. OurCertain CMT customers are impacted by seaborne export market dynamics. Fluctuations in the benchmark price for coal delivery into northwest Europe, as referenced in the Argus/McCloskey's Coal Price Index report (“Report ("API2 index price”price"), as well as Newcastle index coal prices, as referenced in the Argus/McCloskey's Coal Price Index report (“API5("API6 index price”price"), which reflect high-ashlow-ash coal prices shipped from Australia, contribute to our customers' decisions to place tons into the export market and thus impact transloading volumes through our terminal facility. CMT. Increased demand for energy in Europe and decreased global supply of natural gas has resulted in an increase in global demand for coal and an increase in API2 prices in 2021. This resulted in a strong export coal market and higher export coal volumes through CMT as compared to 2020.
Our KRT terminals serve two primary domestic markets, metallurgical coal trade and thermal coal trade. Metallurgical markets are primarily impacted by steel prices and blast furnace operating levels whereas thermal markets are impacted by natural gas prices and electricity demand.
Strong API2 and API5 index prices continued to provide attractive economics for Illinois Basin and Northern Appalachian coal producers during 2018, which resulted in record volumes at our CMT facility. In 2018, the Mississippi River experienced near-historic water levels, which adversely impacted our barge unloading and our vessel loading activities at CMT. At KRT, domestic metallurgical and thermal market conditions and volumes were favorable in 2018 compared to 2017 due to increased demand from steel and utility customers. However, KRT volumes were suppressed during 2018 by rail availability due to strong demand for dry bulk products in the export market.


4
Table of Contents


Seasonality
Our revenues in our cokemaking business and much of our logistics business are largely tied to long-term, take-or-pay contractsagreements and as such, are not seasonal. However, our cokemaking profitability is tied to coal-to-coke yields, which improve in drier weather.  Accordingly, the coal-to-coke yield component of our profitability tends to be more favorable in the third quarter. Extreme weather may also challenge our operating costs and production in the winter months for our domestic coke business. KRT service demand fluctuates due to changes in the domestic electricity markets. Excessively hot summer weather or cold winter weather may increase commercial and residential needs for heat or air conditioning, which in turn may increase electricity usage and the demand for thermal coal and, therefore, may favorably impact our logistics business. Additionally, at CMT, service fluctuates with global thermal coal prices and end market demand. Activity is generally lower in the third quarter, typically due to lower European demand for heat. Operatingoperating costs at CMT are impacted by water levels on the Mississippi River, which are often higher in the spring months.
Raw Materials
Metallurgical coal is the principal raw material for our cokemaking operations. All of the metallurgical coal used to produce coke at our domestic cokemaking facilities is purchased from third-parties. We believe there is an adequate supply of metallurgical coal available in the U.S. and worldwide, and we have been able to supply coal to our domestic cokemaking facilities without any significant disruption in coke production.
Each ton of coke produced at our facilities requires approximately 1.4 tons of metallurgical coal. We purchased 5.9 purchased 6.2 million tons of metallurgical coal in 2018. Coal2021. Metallurgical coal is generally purchased on an annual basis via one-year contracts with costs passed through to our customers in accordance with the applicable coke sales agreements. Occasionally, shortfalls in deliveries by metallurgical coal suppliers require us to procure supplemental coal volumes. As with typical annual purchases, the cost of these supplemental purchases is also generally passed through to our customers. In 2019, certain of2022, our metallurgical coal contracts are based on coke production requirements and do not contain an option to reduce our commitment by up to 15 percent at the Company's discretion.a minimum annual purchase requirement. Most metallurgical coal procurement decisions are made through a coal committee structure with customer participation. The customer can generally exercise an overriding vote on most coal procurement decisions.

Transportation and Freight
For inbound transportation of metallurgical coal purchases, our facilities that access a single rail provider have long-term transportation agreements, and where necessary, coal-mixing agreements that run concurrently with the associated coke sales agreement for the facility. At facilities with multiple transportation options, including rail and barge, we enter into short-term transportation contracts from year to year. Delivery costs, and annual volume commitments included in certain agreements, are generally passed through to the customers.
For coke sales, the point of delivery varies by agreement and facility. The destination for coke sales under long-term, take-or-pay agreements from our Jewell and Haverhill cokemaking facilities is generally designated by the customer and shipments are made by railcar under long-term transportation agreements. All delivery costsagreements, which may include annual volume commitments, and are generally passed through to theour customers. At our Middletown, Indiana Harbor and Granite City cokemaking facilities, coke is delivered primarily by a conveyor belt leading to the customer’s blast furnace, with the customer responsible for additional transportation costs, if any. Most transportation and freight costs in our Logistics segment are paid by the customer directly to the transportation provider.
Research and Development and Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
Our research and development program seeks to improve existing and develop promising new cokemaking technologies, including new product development, and enhance our heat recovery processes. Over the years, this program has
4
Table of Contents

produced numerous patents related to our heat recovery coking design and operation, including patents for pollution control systems, oven pushing and charging mechanisms, oven flue gas control mechanisms and various others. Additionally, we have continued to successfully utilize our existing coke ovens to produce foundry coke in addition to our primary product of blast furnace coke.
At Vitória, Brazil, where we operate one cokemaking facility on behalf of ArcelorMittal Brazil, we have intellectual property and licensing agreements in place for the entity’s use of our technology, under which we receive a per ton licensing fee as well as an annual licensing fee.
We are party to an omnibus agreement with the Partnership, which grants the Partnership a royalty-free license to use the name “SunCoke” and related trademarks. Additionally, the omnibus agreement grants the Partnership a non-exclusive right to use all of our current and future cokemaking and related technology necessary for their operations.


5
Table of Contents


Competition
Cokemaking
The cokemaking business is highly competitive. Most of the world’s coke production capacity is owned by blast furnace steel companies utilizing by-product coke oven technology. The international merchant coke market is largely supplied by Chinese, Colombian and Ukrainian producers, among others, though it is difficultcan be more challenging to maintain high quality coke in the export market, and when coupled with transportation costs, coke imports into the U.S. are often not economical.
The principal competitive factors affecting our cokemaking business include coke quality and price, reliability of supply, proximity to market, access to metallurgical coals and environmental performance. Our oven design and heat recovery technology play a role in all of these factors. Competitors include merchant coke producers as well as the cokemaking facilities owned and operated by blast furnace steel companies.
In the past, there have been technologies which have sought to produce carbonaceous substitutes for coke in the blast furnace. While none have proven commercially viable thus far, we monitor the development of competing technologies carefully. We also monitor ferrous technologies, such as direct reduced iron production, ("DRI"), as these could indirectly impact our blast furnace customers.
We believe we are well-positioned to compete with other coke producers. Our Domestic Coke segment accounts for approximately 3034 percent of the U.S. blast furnace coke market capacity, excluding the capacity used to produce foundry coke. Currentcapacity. The majority of our current production from our cokemaking business is largely committed under long-term, take-or-pay contracts.agreements. As a result, competition mainly affects our ability to obtain new contracts supporting development of additional cokemaking capacity, re-contracting existing facilities, as well as the sale of coke in the spotexport market. Our facilities were constructed using proven, industry-leading technology with many proprietary features allowing us to produce consistently higher quality coke than our competitors produce. Additionally, our technology allows us to produce heat that can be converted into steam or electrical power.
Logistics
The principal competitors of CMT are located on the U.S. Gulf Coast or U.S. East Coast. CMT is one of the largest export terminals on the U.S. Gulf Coast and provides strategic access to seaborne markets for coal and other bulk materials. Additionally, CMT is the largest bulk material terminal in the lower U.S. with direct rail access on the Canadian National Railway. In 2018,2021, CMT accounted for approximately 4759 percent of U.S. thermal coal exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast and approximately 20approximately 16 percent of total U.S. thermal coal exports. CMT has a state-of-the-art ship loader, the largest of its kind in the world. We believe this ship loader has the fastest loading rate available in the Gulf Region, andwhich should allow our customers to benefit from lower shipping costs. Additionally, CMT has a strategic alliance with a company that performs barge unloading services for the terminal, which provides CMT with the ability to transload and mix a significantly broader variety of materials.
Our KRT competitors are generally located within 100 miles of our operations. KRT has fully automated and computer-controlled mixing capabilities that mix coal to within two percent accuracy of customer specifications. KRT also has the ability to provide pad storage and has access to both CSX and Norfolk Southern rail lines as well as the Ohio River system.
Lake Terminal and DRT provide coal handling and/or mixing services to our Indiana Harbor and Jewell cokemaking facilities, respectively, and therefore, do not have any competitors.
EmployeesHuman Capital Management
Each employee at SunCoke is part of our collaborative and complimentary team. We are committed to maintaining an inclusive workplace that brings out the best in all of us. We respect all employees for their unique expertise and welcome the ideas they bring from their individual experience, education and training. We continually strive to make our operations more efficient, while creating a respectful work environment for each team member. Company leadership and our Board of
5
Table of Contents

Directors are actively involved in overseeing the Company’s human capital management programs. Our Chief Legal Officer & Chief Human Resources Officer, in partnership with local Human Resources and General Managers, sponsors the development and oversight of all human capital programs in the organization including: (i) culture, (ii) workforce composition, recruitment and our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, (iii) workforce stability, (iv) employee development and training, (v) benefits, (vi) talent management and total compensation, (vii) safety, and (viii) ethics and compliance.
Workforce Culture
Our culture at SunCoke is driven by our core values. SunCoke’s values of excellence, innovation, commitment, integrity and stewardship are at the heart of who we are and how we work every day. They guide our actions and decisions so we can always strive to do the right thing for our stakeholders, our business and each other.
•Excellence: expect the best from yourself, remove obstacles, inspire and support others, embrace diversity and celebrate success.
•Innovation: master the science and process, create a better way, find a better solution and push the envelope.
•Commitment: deliver results, be accountable, work as a team, continuously improve and grow and always communicate effectively.
•Integrity: do what is right, say what you mean, do what you say, earn trust and treat others with respect.
•Stewardship: providesafe, reliable and environmentally sound operations for our people and their families, our customers and the communities where we do business.
Workforce Composition, Recruitment and Our Commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”)
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we have approximately 895848 employees in the U.S. Approximately 4041 percent of our domestic employees, principally at our cokemaking operations, are represented by the United Steelworkers union under various contracts.local collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, approximately 3 percent of our domestic employees are represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers. While the labor agreement at our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility expired on August 31, 2015, the parties mutually agreed to extend the terms of this agreement through August 31, 2018. Currently both parties are working under the term of the contract extension while negotiating a new agreement. We do not anticipate any work stoppages during the extended period of the agreement. The laborLabor agreements at KRT, Lake Terminal, and HaverhillIndiana Harbor will expire on April 30, 2019,2022, June 30, 20192022, and NovemberSeptember 1, 2019,2022, respectively. We will negotiate the renewal of these agreements in 20192022 and do not anticipate any work stoppages.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we have approximately 285279 employees at the cokemaking facility in Vitória, Brazil, all of whom are represented by a union under a labor agreement. During 2018,2021, the labor agreement at our Vitoria,Vitória, Brazil facility was renewed for an additional year, and it expires on October 31, 2019.November 30, 2022.

We partner with reputable recruitment firms to fill key positions. Through those partnerships, we have a commitment to fill our candidate slates with a diverse group of candidates. SunCoke’s commitment to diversity recruiting in 2021 also included a partnership with Professional Diversity Network, which allows us to develop our talent pipeline directly from eight affinity networks. Hiring managers then focus on ensuring a diverse pool of candidates are considered for job postings. In 2021, we enhanced our diversity & inclusion training. For frontline leaders and all SunCoke management, the training was conducted by an outside firm to further develop the ability to foster diversity and inclusion and create an environment where everyone feels valued and has the opportunity to succeed.
Approximately 10 percent of the Company's global workforce is female and minorities represent approximately 17 percent of the Company's U.S. workforce. The tables below provide breakdowns of gender representation globally and racial/ethnic group representation for U.S. employees.

6
Table of Contents



Gender Representation for Global Employees
FemaleMale
Number of employeesPercent of employee levelNumber of employeesPercent of employee level
Executive(1)
433 %867 %
Non-Executive Management(2)
2826 %7874 %
Senior Leaders(3)
3227 %8673 %
Professionals(4)
3537 %5963 %
All Other Employees(5)
445 %87195 %
Grand Total11110 %101690 %
Racial/Ethnic Representation of US Employees
AsianBlack or African AmericanHispanic or LatinoWhiteOther
Number of employeesPercent of employee levelNumber of employeesPercent of employee levelNumber of employeesPercent of employee levelNumber of employeesPercent of employee levelNumber of employeesPercent of employee level
Executive(1)
18 %0— %0— %1192 %0— %
Non-Executive Management(2)
33 %44 %44 %8488 %11 %
Senior Leaders(3)
44 %44 %44 %9587 %11 %
Professionals(4)
23 %34 %34 %6189 %0— %
All Other Employees(5)
0— %7010 %467 %54682 %91 %
Grand Total61 %779 %536 %70283 %101 %
(1)Represents Executives/Senior Officers and Managers as defined by the EEO-1 Job Classification Guide
(2)Represents First/Mid Officers and Managers as defined by the EEO-1 Job Classification Guide
(3)Represents a weighted average of Executive Management and Non-Executive Management
(4)Represents Professionals and Administrative Support Workers as defined by the EEO-1 Job Classification Guide
(5)Represents all other classified employees as defined by the EEO-1 Job Classification Guide
Workforce Stability & Leadership Experience
Our commitment to employee retention through our talent management, benefits, performance management and total compensation programs is shown through our low regrettable turnover rate of less than 1 percent in 2021. The stability of our workforce is anchored by our experienced corporate leadership team along with our General Managers that lead the day-to-day operations at our facilities. Our leaders each have an average of nearly 20 years of leadership experience and an average tenure (or length of service) of over 10 years with SunCoke.
Employee Development & Training
SunCoke provides a robust training program that meets or exceeds all applicable regulatory requirements. We also provide specialized trainings on an as-needed basis for current topics throughout the year. Over the past several years, special training topics have included Active Shooter Preparedness, Harassment, Worker’s Compensation, Diversity and Inclusion, Conducting Effective Investigations, Retirement Planning and Substance Abuse Awareness.
SunCoke’s Personal Information & Privacy Policy outlines specific procedures to ensure that employees handle sensitive information in a secure and responsible manner. The Personal Information & Privacy Policy is updated to remain consistent with data security best practices. SunCoke utilizes a variety of information security training methods, including in-depth, periodic policy training, annual interactive video-based Code of Conduct training segments on data security best
7
Table of Contents

practices, and periodic security awareness communications that remind employees to stay vigilant with respect to data security.
We believe in developing our employees both within their daily roles and to be ready for their next assignment at SunCoke. Development occurs in the form of leadership training, stretch assignments, and on the job training. For example, in 2021 SunCoke partnered with a global leadership consulting firm to certify Human Resources managers to implement frontline leader training programs. The programs will focus on a number of areas that are essential for frontline leadership development, including training on high-quality decision making, communication, coaching, and improving workplace performance.
On an annual basis, we engage in succession management to ensure that development and training and development opportunities are identified for high performing talent, preparing potential successors for our most critical roles. Of the 147 positions filled in 2021, 59 (40 percent) were filled from within the Company.
In many cases, we take a hands-on approach to training at SunCoke. As we pursued entry into the foundry coke market, we primarily utilized intra-Company training of existing personnel to develop, implement, and execute this initiative. Leadership had the opportunity to provide many insights on topics from producing foundry to engaging new customers, highlighting the ability of our workforce to adjust to changing demands and grow with the Company. We pride ourselves on being a lean workforce that focuses on developing and promoting talent internally.
Benefits
We offer comprehensive health, welfare and retirement benefits. We also offer supplemental benefits programs designed to enhance the daily life and well-being of our employees, including: weight-loss, benefits services price-transparency, retirement planning education and coaching, paid-time off (including for community service), tuition reimbursement, health management for chronic conditions, a 24/7 employee assistance program and Identity Theft Protection.
Talent Management and Total Compensation
Our full-year performance management process begins with setting annual goals for the Company, which guide the development of functional, local and individual employee goals. Employees and their managers are accountable for the goals and must review their performance against the goals on an ongoing basis. We provide employee base wages that are competitive and consistent with employee positions, skill levels, experience, and geographic location. Additionally, we believe that individual performance and the results of the Company are directly linked to the payment of annual short-term incentives, which is why a significant portion of employee compensation is performance-based. Our short-term incentives include both financial metrics as well as performance-based environmental and safety metrics. The level of pay at risk increases progressively with positions of greater responsibility, with long-term cash and equity incentives with multi-year vesting periods granted at the Director, Vice President and Senior Vice President levels. Further, below the Director level, top performers may be granted long-term cash and equity incentives with multi-year vesting for retention. This helps the Company to retain those identified as having the top skills and abilities that are critical to our business.
Safety
We live by the ethos: Think Safe. Act Safe. Be Safe.
Our top priority has always been the safety and health of our employees, contractors and visitors. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this became even more challenging as we worked to ensure workplace safety and health was maintained. In response to the pandemic in 2020, we established an internal task force of subject matter experts who initiated enhanced health and safety measures across our facilities and enacted a work from home program for all qualifying personnel. Each of our sites implemented screening procedures consistent with U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") recommendations such as screening questionnaires and temperature checks for employees, contractors and other service providers. Additionally, to prevent workplace exposure to the virus, we adopted further protocols consistent with CDC, state and local guidance including mask wearing, social distancing, contact tracing and quarantine requirements. Many of these protocols have evolved and continued throughout 2021 in accordance with regulations from federal, state and local government agencies and taking into consideration CDC guidelines and other public health authorities.
Safety is so important to SunCoke that we include safety in our core values and also incorporate safety as a metric in our short-term incentive program.


8
Table of Contents

We have an ambition of zero incidents and injuries in the workplace. To reach our goal, we follow our Safety Vision, which is comprised of five core components including:
•Visible safety leadership - Site and corporate leadership have made a commitment to safety as the paramount value within the Company and our site leadership practices visible safety leadership on a daily basis.
•Communication and training - All team members and contractors take responsibility for their own safety and the safety of those around them and we train to ensure proper safety knowledge.
•Safe work practices - All team members and contractors take the time necessary to properly identify and mitigate all hazards and safely do each job.
•Incident investigation – We comply with all applicable laws and regulations and perform root cause analysis on all incidents.
•Continuous improvement – We are committedalways focused on preventing safety incidents and Thinking Safe, Acting Safe and Being Safe.
Our target for Total Recordable Incident Rate ("TRIR") at SunCoke for 2021 was 0.8 company-wide, and at the end of the year, it was 0.76. We improved our safety performance from 2020 and continue to maintainingperform well above industry standards, as detailed below.
Our excellent safety record is best understood in comparison to industry-wide safety performance. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the TRIR within our sector of Other Petroleum and Coal Products (Coke) Manufacturing was 3.1 for 2020. For comparison, it was 2.1 for the Iron and Steel Mills sector. Our year-over-year safety performance is consistently lower than average industry-wide rates, signaling fewer recordable incidents and demonstrating our strong commitment to safety. In a safe work environmentyear especially filled with external stressors and ensuring environmental compliance acrossdistractions, we successfully managed to keep our employees focused on safety and the job at hand.
YearEmployee TRIRContractor TRIR
20190.90.8
20201.080.38
20210.770.75
Ethics & Compliance
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our operations,officers, directors and employees, including senior financial officers and executives. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, along with our Core Values, establish the principles that guide our daily actions to uphold the highest standards of ethical and legal behavior. Whether working with customers, vendors, business partners or neighbors, we always strive to act with integrity. All employees must complete annual training on our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which we review and update as the healthneeded. The most recent updates occurred in 2021. We educate all employees to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Our Prohibited Payments and safetyPolitical Contributions Policy addresses payments made to U.S. officials, including campaign contributions. Our Gifts, Entertainment and Sponsored Travel Policy provides guidance regarding business courtesies, including reporting obligations and value limitations. We also have a Human Rights Policy, which affirms our commitment to a fair living wage for all employees.
Guidance & Reporting Without Fear of Retaliation
All employees, officers and directors must report suspected policy violations of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to the Compliance Team, which consists of our Chief Compliance Officer and other leaders from the Human Resources and Legal Departments. They can do so through a variety of channels, including, but not limited to, directly reporting to a supervisor, providing email or verbal reports directly to the Compliance Team and using our confidential, third-party 24/7 reporting hotline or website. Calls and online submissions are anonymous, unless the notifying party discloses his or her identity. We take the anonymity of these communications seriously and SunCoke’s Compliance Team follows up on each submission. In addition to the anonymous hotline, hourly employees andrepresented by a collective bargaining unit can also file a report using the communities in which we operate are paramount. We employ practices and conduct training to help ensure that our employees work safely. Furthermore, we utilize processes for managing and monitoring safety and environmental performance.
We have consistently operated within the top quartilesfor the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s ("OSHA") recordable injury rates as measured and reported by the American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute.applicable union grievance process.
Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Our operations are subject to extensive governmental regulation, including environmental laws, which are a significant factor in our business. The following discussion summarizes the principal legal and regulatory requirements that we believe may significantly affect us.
9
Table of Contents


Permitting and Bonding
•Permitting Process for Cokemaking Facilities. The permitting process for our cokemaking facilities is administered by the individual states.each state individually. However, the main requirements for obtaining environmental construction and operating permits are found in the federal regulations. Once all requirements are satisfied, a state or local agency produces an initial draft permit. Generally, the facility reviews and comments on the initial draft. After accepting or rejecting the facility’s comments, the agency typically publishes a notice regarding the issuance of the draft permit and makes the permit and supporting documents available for public review and comment. A public hearing may be scheduled, and the EPA also has the opportunity to comment on the draft permit. The state or local agency responds to comments on the draft permit and may make revisions before a final construction permit is issued. A construction permit allows construction and commencement of operations ofat the facility and is generally valid for at least 18 months. Generally, construction commences during this period, while many states allow this period to be extended in certain situations. A facility's operating permit may be a state operating permit or a Title V operating permit.
•Air Quality. Our cokemaking facilities employ MACTMaximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards designed to limit emissions of certain hazardous air pollutants. Specific MACT standards apply to oven door leaks, charging, oven pressure, pushing and quenching. Certain MACT standards for new cokemaking facilities were developed using test data from SunCoke's Jewell cokemaking facility located in Vansant, Virginia. UnderAdditionally, under applicable federal air quality regulations, permitting requirements may differ among facilities, depending upon whether the cokemaking facility will be located in an “attainment” area—i.e., one that meets the national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”) for certain pollutants, or in a “non-attainment” or "unclassifiable" area. The status of an area may change over time as new NAAQS standards are adopted, resulting in an area changechanging from one status or classification to another. In an attainment area, the facility must install air pollution control equipment or employ BACT.Best Achievable Control Technology (BACT). In a non-attainment area, the facility must install air pollution control equipment or employ procedures that meet LAERLowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) standards. LAER standards are the most stringent emission limitation achieved in practice by existing facilities. Unlike the BACT analysis, cost is generally not considered as part of a LAER analysis, and emissions in a non-attainment area must be offset by emission reductions obtained from other sources.
Any changes in attainment status for areas where our facilities are located presents a risk that we may be required to install additional pollution controls, which may require us to incur greater operating costs at those facilities.
Stringent•More stringent NAAQS for ambient nitrogen dioxide ("NO2") and sulfur dioxide ("SO2") went into effect in 2010. In July 2013, the EPA identified or "designated" as non-attainment 29 areas in 16 states where monitored air quality showed violations of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. In August 2015, the EPA finalized a new rulemaking to assist in implementation of the primary 1-hour SO2 NAAQS that requires either additional monitoring, or modeling of ambient air SO2 levels in various areas including where certain of our facilities are located. By July 2016, states subject to this rulemaking were required to provide the EPA with either a modeling approach using existing emissions data, or a plan to undertake ambient air monitoring for SO2 to begin in 2017. For states that choose to install ambient air SO2 monitoring stations, after three years of data has been collected, or sometime in 2020, the EPA will evaluate this data relative to the appropriate attainment designation for the areas under the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. For states that chose to model, designations were made by December 2017. This rulemaking required certain of our facilities to undertake this ambient air monitoring or modeling. In December 2017, EPA issued a final designation of attainment or unclassifiable for all areas where our facilities are located. These designations mean that no future action is required for the facilities with respect to SO2 emissions at this time. However, legal challengesit is possible for these areas to these designations are possible.be redesignated in the future as non-attainment areas. If redesignated, we may be required


7
Table of Contents


to install additional pollution controls and incur greater costs of operating at those of our facilities located in areas that EPA determines to be non-attainment with the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS based on its evaluation of this data. NAAQS.
•In 2012, amore stringent NAAQS for fine particulate matter ("PM"), or PM 2.5, went into effect. In January 2015, the areas where the Granite City and Indiana Harbor facilities are located were designated unclassifiable for PM 2.5, and the areas where the Haverhill and Jewell facilities are located were designated unclassifiable/attainment for PM 2.5. In April 2015, the area where the Middletown facility is located was designated unclassifiable/attainment for PM 2.5. These designations mean that no action is required for the facilities with respect to PM 2.5 emissions at this time. However, it is possible for these areas to be redesignated in the future as non-attainment areas. If redesignated, we may be required to install additional pollution controls and incur greater costs of operating at those of our facilities located in areas that EPA determines to be non-attainment with the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS.
•In November 2015, the EPA revised the existing NAAQS for ground level ozone to make the standard more stringent. In January 2018, EPA designated the areas where the Haverhill and Jewell facilities are located as attainment/unclassifiable for ozone. In June 2018, EPA designated the areas where the Granite City, Indiana Harbor, and Middletown facilities are located as marginal nonattainment for ozone. The status of the area where the Indiana Harbor facility is located was challenged in litigation and upheld in July 2020. As a result of the same litigation, the status of the area where the Granite City facility is located was remanded to EPA, which finalized the area as nonattainment in January 2021. In December 2020, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency ("Ohio EPA") informed stakeholders in the Cincinnati and Cleveland nonattainment areas, including the Middletown facility, that the agency anticipates those areas will be reclassified as moderate nonattainment areas by the U.S. EPA in late 2021. However, on November 17, 2021, Ohio EPA released for public comment a draft request to the U.S. EPA to redesignate the area where
10
Table of Contents

the Middletown facility is located as being in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS based on updated air monitoring data. If the U.S. EPA denies the request for redesignation or does not approve the request before Ohio EPA promulgates new nonattainment area regulations, it is possible that the Middletown facility will be required to comply with those regulations. Nonattainment designations under the new standardsstandard and any future more stringent standard for ozone have two impacts on permitting:potential impacts: (1) demonstrating compliance with the standard using dispersion modeling from afor permitting new facility willfacilities or significant new projects may be more difficult; and (2) facilities operating in areas that becomeare classified as moderate non-attainment areas due to the application of new standards may be required to install Reasonably Available Control Technology (“RACT”). A number of states have filed or joined suits to challenge the EPA’s new standard in court.demonstrate that they already meet RACT standards. While we are not able to determine the extent to which this new standard will impact our business at this time, it does have thepresents a potential to have a materialrisk of having an impact on our operations and cost structure.operations.
•The EPA adopted a rule in 2010 requiring a new facility that is a major source of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) to install equipment or employ BACT procedures. Currently, there is little information on what may be acceptable as BACT to control GHGs (primarily carbon dioxide from our facilities), but the database and additional guidance may be enhanced in the future.
•Several states have additional requirements and standards other than those in the federal statutes and regulations. Many states have lists of “air toxics” with emission limitations determined by dispersion modeling. States also often have specific regulations that deal with visible emissions, odors and nuisance. In some cases, the state delegates some or all of these functions to local agencies.
•Wastewater and Stormwater. Our heat recovery cokemaking technology does not produce wastewater as is typically associated with by-product cokemaking. Our cokemaking facilities, in some cases, have non-process wastewater and/or stormwater discharge and stormwater permits.
•Waste. The primary solid waste product from our heat recovery cokemaking technology is calcium sulfate from flue gas desulfurization, which is generally taken to a solid waste landfill. The material from periodic cleaning of heat recovery steam generators has been disposed of as hazardous waste. On the whole, our heat recovery cokemaking process does not generate substantial quantities of hazardous waste as is typically associated with by-product cokemaking. The material from periodic cleaning of heat recovery steam generators has been disposed of off-site as hazardous waste.
Our facilities only generate wastes and do not have permits for waste transportation, storage or disposal.
•U.S. Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Endangered Species Act and certain counterpart state regulations are intended to protect species whose populations allow for categorization as either endangered or threatened. With respect to permitting additional cokemaking facilities, protection of endangered or threatened species may have the effect of prohibiting, limiting the extent of or placing permitting conditions on soil removal, road building and other activities in areas containing the affected species. Based on the species that have been designated as endangered or threatened on our properties and the current application of these laws and regulations, we do not believe that they are likely to have a material adverse effect on our operations.
•Permitting Processand Bonding for Former Coal Mining Operations. The U.S. coal mining permit application process is initiated by collecting baseline data to adequately assess and model the pre-mine environmental condition of the permit area, including geologic data, soil and rock structures, cultural resources, soils, surface and ground water hydrology, and coal that we intend to mine. We use this data to develop a mine and reclamation plan, which incorporate provisions of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (“SMCRA”), and applicable state programs and complementary environmental programs that impact coal mining. The permit application includes the mineequivalents govern mining permits and reclamation plan,plans, documents defining ownership and agreements pertaining to coal, minerals, oil and gas, water rights, rights of way and surface land and documents required by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s (“OSM’s”) Applicant Violator System. Once a permit application
We currently have no applications pending for new SMCRA permits, but hold several permits for which reclamation is submittedincomplete.
Our reclamation obligations under applicable environmental laws could be substantial. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP"), we are required to account for the costs related to the regulatory agency, it goes through a completenessclosure of mines and technical review before a public notice and comment period. Some SMCRA mine permits take over a year to prepare, depending on the size and complexityreclamation of the land upon exhaustion of coal reserves. The fair value of an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. At which time, the present value of the estimated asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. At December 31, 2021, we had an asset retirement obligation of $2.2 million related to estimated mine reclamation costs. The amounts recorded are dependent upon a number of variables, including the estimated future retirement costs, inflation rates, and often take six months to two yearsthe assumed credit-adjusted interest rates. Our future operating results would be adversely affected if these accruals were determined to be issued. Regulatory authorities have considerable discretioninsufficient. These obligations are unfunded. Failure to comply with the regulatory requirements can result in the timing of the permit issuance and the public has the right to

sanctions.

11
8
Table of Contents



comment on and otherwise engage in the permitting process, including through public hearings and intervention in the courts. SMCRA mine permits also take a significant period of time to be transferred.
•Bonding Requirements for Permits Related to Former Coal Mining Operations and Coal Terminals with Surface Mining Permits. Before a SMCRA permit or a surface mining permit is issued, in West Virginia, a mine operator must submit a bond or other form of financial security to guarantee the payment and performance of certain long-term mine closure and reclamation obligations. The costs of these bonds or other forms of financial security have fluctuated in recent years and the market terms of surety bonds generally have become less favorable to those entities with legacy mining obligations or terminal operators and others with such permits. These changes in the terms of such bonds have been accompanied, at times, by a decrease in the number of companies willing to issue surety bonds. As of December 31, 2018,2021, we have posted $10.3 $9.6 million in surety bonds or other forms of financial security for reclamation purposes.
future reclamation.
Regulation of Operations
•Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act and similar state laws and regulations affect our cokemaking operations, primarily through permitting and/or emissions control requirements relating to particulate matter (“PM”) and sulfur dioxide (“SO2”)criteria pollutants and MACT standards. The Clean Air Act air emissions programs that may affect our operations, directly or indirectly, include, but are not limited to: the Acid Rain Program; NAAQS implementation for SO2, PM, and nitrogen oxides (“NOx”),NO2, lead, ozone, and carbon monoxide; GHG rules; the CleanCross-State Air InterstatePollution Rule; MACT emissions limitsstandards for hazardous air pollutants; the Regional Haze Program; New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”); and New Source Review.
◦The Clean Air Act requires, among other things, the regulation of hazardous air pollutants through the development and promulgation of various industry-specific MACT standards. Our cokemaking facilities are subject to two categories of MACT standards. The first category applies to pushing and quenching. The second category applies to emissions from charging and coke oven doors. The EPA is required to make a risk-based determination for pushing and quenching emissions and determine whether additional emissions reductions are necessary. In 2016, EPA issued a request for information and testing to our cokemaking facilities and other companies as part of its residual risk and technology review of the MACT standard for pushing and quenching, and a technology review of the MACT standard for coke ovens and charging emissions. Testing was conducted by our cokemaking facilities in 2017, but2017. EPA is required to finalize any changes to these MACT standards by December 26, 2022 pursuant to a settlement agreement with environmental groups. While we are not able to determine the EPA has yetextent to publish or proposewhich any residualnew standards would impact our business at this time, it presents a potential risk standards; therefore,of having an impact on our operations and costs.
◦The Regional Haze program under the impactClean Air Act requires that states submit State Implementation Plans that demonstrate reasonable progress towards achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. On November 5, 2020, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (“VDEQ”) requested that the Jewell facility conduct an analysis of potential controls for SO2 under the Regional Haze program. VDEQ is currently reviewing Jewell’s determination that no additional controls are feasible. While we are not able to determine the extent to which a different determination by VDEQ or EPA regulation in this area cannot be estimatedwould impact our business at this time.
time, it presents a potential risk of having an impact on our operations and costs at the Jewell facility.
•Terminal Operations. Our terminal operations located along waterways and the Gulf of Mexico are also governed by permitting requirements under the CWA and CAA. These terminals are subject to U.S. Coast Guard regulations and comparable state statutes regarding design, installation, construction, and management. Many such terminals owned and operated by other entities that are also used to transport coal and petcoke, including for export, have been pursued by environmental interest groups for alleged violations of their permits’ requirements, or have seen their efforts to obtain or renew such permits contested by such groups. While we believe that our operations are in material compliance with these permits, it is possible that such challenges or claims will be made against our operations in the future. Moreover, our terminal operations may be affected by the impacts of additional regulation on petcoke or on the mining of all types of coal and use of thermal coal for fuel, which is restricting supply in some markets and may reduce the volumes of coal that our terminals manage.
•Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) regulates the sales of electricity from our Haverhill and Middletown facilities, including the implementation of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”). The nature of the operations of the Haverhill and Middletown facilities makes each facility a qualifying facility under PURPA, which exempts the facilities and the Company from certain regulatory burdens, including the Public
12
Table of Contents

Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 (“PUHCA”), limited provisions of the FPA, and certain state laws and regulation. FERC has granted requests for authority to sell electricity from the Haverhill and Middletown facilities at market-based rates and the entities are subject to FERC’s market-based rate regulations, which require regular regulatory compliance filings.
•Clean Water Act of 1972. Although our cokemaking facilities generally do not have water discharge permits, the The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) may affect our operations by requiring water quality standards generally and through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”). Regular monitoring, reporting requirements and performance standards are requirements of NPDES permits that govern the discharge of pollutants into water. Discharges must either meet state water quality standards or be authorized through


9
Table of Contents


available regulatory processes such as alternate standards or variances. Additionally, through the CWA Section 401 certification program, states have approval authority over federalwater discharge permits or licenses that might result in a discharge to their waters. Similarly, for permitting or any future water intake and/or discharge projects, our facilities could be subject to the Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permitting process.
•Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. We may generate wastes, including “solid” wastes and “hazardous” wastes that are subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes, although certain mining and mineral beneficiation wastes and certain wastes derived from the combustion of coal currently are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes under RCRA.statutes. The EPA has limited the disposal options for certain wastes that are designated as hazardous wastes under RCRA. Furthermore, it is possible that certain wastes generated by our operations that currently are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes may in the future be designated as hazardous wastes, and therefore be subject to more rigorous and costly management, disposal and clean-up requirements. Certain of our wastes are also subject to Department of Transportation regulations for shipping of materials.
Any changes to hazardous waste standards or the constituents in the wastes generated at our facilities presents a potential risk of having an impact on our operations and cost structure.
•Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as Superfund, and similar state laws, responsibility for the entire cost of clean-up of a contaminated site, as well as natural resource damages, can be imposed upon current or former site owners or operators, or upon any party who released one or more designated “hazardous substances” at the site, regardless of the lawfulness of the original activities that led to the contamination. In the course of our operations we may have generated and may generate wastes that fall within CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances. We also may be an owner or operator of facilities at which hazardous substances have been released by previous owners or operators. Under CERCLA, we may be responsible for all or part of the costs of cleaning up facilities at which such substances have been released and for natural resource damages. We also must comply with reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act.
•Pursuant to a court-mandated deadline, EPA published a final rule in December 2020 that does not impose financial assurance requirements for managing hazardous substances on the coal products manufacturing sector under Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA 108(b)”). EPA’s final rule determined that the risks associated with these facilities’ operations are addressed by existing federal and state programs and regulations and modern industry practices.
•Climate Change Legislation and Regulations. Our facilities are presently subject to the GHG reporting rule, which obligates us to report annual emissions of GHGs. The EPA also finalized a rule in 2010 requiring a new facility that is a major source of GHGs to install equipment or employ BACT procedures. In 2014, the Supreme Court issued an opinion holding that although EPA may not treat GHGs as a pollutant for the purpose of determining whether a source must obtain a PSD or Title V permit, EPA may continue to require GHG limitations in permits for sources classified as major based on their emission of other pollutants. Currently there is little information as to what may constitute BACT for GHG in most industries. Under this rule, certain modifications to our facilities could subject us to the additional permitting and other obligations relative to emissions of GHGs under the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("NSR/PSD") and Title V programs of the Clean Air Act based on whether the facility triggered NSR/PSD because of emissions of another pollutant such as SO2, NOx, PM, ozone or lead.
◦The EPA has engaged in a rulemaking to regulate GHG emissions from existing and new coal fired power plants, and we expect continued legal challenges to this rulemaking and any future rulemaking for other industries. For instance, in August 2015, the EPA issued its final Clean Power Plan ("CPP") rules establishing carbon pollution standards for power plants. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme
13
Table of Contents

Court granted a stay of the implementation of the Clean Power PlanCPP before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (“("D.C. Circuit”Circuit") issued a decision on the rule. By its terms, this stay will remain in effect throughout the pendency of the appeals process including at the D.C. Circuit and the Supreme Court through any certiorari petition that may be granted. In October 2017, the EPA proposed to repeal the Clean Power Plan ("CPP") although the final outcome of this proposal and the pending litigation regarding the CPP is uncertain at this time. In connection with this proposed repeal,CPP. EPA issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("ANPRM") in December 2017 regarding emission guidelines to limit GHG emissions from existing electric utility generating units. The ANPRM seeks comment regarding what the EPA should include in a potential new, existing source regulation of GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act that the EPA may propose. On October 9, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected any further challenges to the decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan. Although EPAthen proposed the Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”("ACE") rule as a replacement for the CPP in August 2018, which it finalized in June 2019. In 2020, various legal challenges to the ACE rule has not yet been finalized.
were filed, and in January 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated EPA’s repeal and replacement of the CPP with the ACE rule and remanded the rulemaking to the agency. In October 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari to review the D.C. Circuit’s decision.
Currently, we do not anticipate these new or existing power planplant GHG rules towould apply directly to our facilities. However, the impact current and future GHG-related legislation and regulations have on us will depend on a number of factors, including whether GHG sources in multiple sectors of the economy are regulated, thewhether an overall GHG emissions cap level is established, the degree to which GHG offsets are allowed, the allocation of emission allowances to specific sources, and actions by the states in implementing these requirementsrequirements. Any new GHG reduction laws on regulations that apply to us will likely require us to incur increased operating and the indirect impact of carbon regulationcapital costs and/or increased taxes on coal prices.GHG emissions. We may not recover the costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements imposed on us from our customers due to limitations in our agreements. The imposition of a carbon tax or similar regulation could materially and adversely affect our revenues. Collectively, these requirements along with restrictions and requirements regarding the mining of all types of coal may reduce the volumes of coal that we manage and may ultimately adversely impact our revenues. Depending on whether another rule is promulgated in the future, it could increase the demand for natural gas-generated electricity.
Mine Improvement•Occupational Safety and New Emergency Response Act of 2006. The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 (the “Miner Act”), has increased significantly the enforcement of safety and health standards and imposed safety and health standards on all aspects of mining operations. There also has been a significant increase in the dollar penalties assessed for citations issued.


10
Table of Contents



Safety.Health ACT (OSH Act). Our facilities are subject to regulation by OSHA or MSHA under the OSH Act and other agencies with standards designed to ensure worker safety. These standards impose minimum requirements for our operations to maintain and operate sites and equipment in a safe manner. As noted above, we have consistently operated within the top quartiles for OSHA’s recordable injury rates as measured and reported by the American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute.
•Security. CMT is subject to regulation by the U.S. Coast Guard pursuant to the Maritime Transportation Security Act. We have an internal inspection program designed to monitor and ensure compliance by CMT with these requirements. We believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations regarding the security of the facility.
Reclamation and Remediation
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The SMCRA established comprehensive operational, environmental, reclamation and closure standards for all aspects of U.S. surface mining as well as many aspects of deep mining. Where state regulatory agencies have adopted federal mining programs under SMCRA, the state becomes the regulatory authority, and states that operate federally approved state programs may impose standards that are more stringent than the requirements of SMCRA. Permitting under SMCRA generally has become more difficult in recent years, which adversely affects the cost and availability of coal. The Abandoned Mine Land Fund, which is part of SMCRA, assesses a fee on all coal produced in the U.S. From October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2012, the fee was $0.315 per ton of surface-mined coal and $0.135 per ton of underground mined coal. From October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2021, the fee has been reduced to $0.28 per ton of surface-mined coal and $0.12 per ton of underground mined coal. Our reclamation obligations under applicable environmental laws could be substantial. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP"), we are required to account for the costs related to the closure of mines and the reclamation of the land upon exhaustion of coal reserves. The fair value of an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The present value of the estimated asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. At December 31, 2018, we had an asset retirement obligation of $4.3 million related to estimated mine reclamation costs. The amounts recorded are dependent upon a number of variables, including the estimated future retirement costs, inflation rates, and the assumed credit-adjusted interest rates. Our future operating results would be adversely affected if these accruals were determined to be insufficient. These obligations are unfunded. Further, although specific criteria varies from state to state as to what constitutes an “owner” or “controller” relationship, under SMCRA the responsibility for reclamation or remediation, unabated violations, unpaid civil penalties and unpaid reclamation fees of independent contract mine operators can be imputed to other companies which are deemed, according to the regulations, to have “owned” or “controlled” the contract mine operator. Sanctions are quite severe and can include being denied new permits, permit amendments, permit revisions and revocation or suspension of permits issued since the violation or penalty or fee due date.
•Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 and Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977, as amended in 1981. Under these laws, each U.S. coal mine operator must pay federal black lung benefits and medical expenses to claimants who are current and former employees and last worked for the operator after July 1, 1973. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which was implemented in 2010, amended previous legislation and provides for the automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and changes the legal criteria used to assess and award claims. SunCoke is not an active coal mine operator and does not perform or oversee coal mining. However, SunCoke has retained certain black lung liabilities associated with legacy coal operations. Our obligation related to black lung benefits at December 31, 20182021 was $49.4$63.3 million and was estimated based on various assumptions, including actuarial estimates, discount rates, number of active claims, changes in health care costs and the impact of PPACA.


11
Table of Contents


Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as Superfund, and similar state laws, responsibility for the entire cost of clean-up of a contaminated site, as well as natural resource damages, can be imposed upon current or former site owners or operators, or upon any party who released one or more designated “hazardous substances” at the site, regardless of the lawfulness of the original activities that led to the contamination. In the course of our operations we may have generated and may generate wastes that fall within CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances. We also may be an owner or operator of facilities at which hazardous substances have been released by previous owners or operators. Under CERCLA, we may be responsible for all or part of the costs of cleaning up facilities at which such substances have been released and for natural resource damages. We also must comply with reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Environmental Matters and Compliance
Our failure to comply with the aforementioned requirements may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of clean-up and site restoration costs and liens, the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations, the suspension or revocation of permits and other enforcement measures that could have the effect of limiting production from our operations. Please see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Notices of Violation ("NOVs") issued by the EPA and state regulators for our Haverhill, Granite City, and Indiana Harbor cokemaking facilities.
Many other legal and administrative proceedings are pending or may be brought against us arising out of our current and past operations, including matters related to commercial and tax disputes, product liability, antitrust, employment claims, natural resource damage claims, premises-liability claims, allegations of exposures of third-parties to toxic substances and general environmental claims. Although the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be ascertained at this time, it is reasonably possible that some of them could be resolved unfavorably to us. Management of the Company believes that any liability which may arise from such matters would not be material in relation to the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company at December 31, 2018.
IRS Final Regulations on Qualifying Income
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") provides that a publicly-traded partnership will be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. However, if 90 percent or more of a partnership’s gross income for every taxable year it is publicly-traded consists of “qualifying income,” the publicly-traded partnership may continue to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
At the time of the Partnership’s initial public offering, in January 2013, the Partnership believed, and received a legal opinion to the effect, that income from its cokemaking operations would be treated as generating qualifying income under the Code.  The Company and counsel believed at the time that this view was based on the correct interpretation of the Code and the legislative history of the relevant Code section, and since that time continued to believe that income from its cokemaking operations is qualifying income. 
On January 19, 2017, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued qualifying income regulations (the "Final Regulations") on the treatment of income from natural resource activities of publicly traded partnerships as qualifying income for purposes of the Code.  The Final Regulations were published in the Federal Register on January 24, 2017, and apply to taxable years beginning after January 19, 2017.  Under the Final Regulations, the Partnership’s cokemaking operations have been excluded from the definition of activities that generate qualifying income. 
The Final Regulations provide that if a partnership’s income from non-qualifying operations “was qualifying income under the statute as reasonably interpreted,” then that partnership will have a transition period ending on the last day of the partnership’s taxable year that included the date that is ten years after the date the Final Regulations are published in the Federal Register (i.e., December 31, 2027), during which it can treat income from such activities as qualifying income. After conferring with outside counsel, the Partnership and we are of the view that its interpretation was reasonable in concluding that the Partnership’s income from cokemaking was qualifying income, and that the Partnership will benefit from the ten-year transition period. Subsequent to the transition period, certain cokemaking entities in the Partnership will become taxable as corporations. Also see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors" and Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.
The present federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including the Partnership, or an investment in its common units, may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial interpretation at any time. Any


12
Table of Contents


modification to the federal income tax laws and interpretations thereof may or may not be applied retroactively. Moreover, any such modification could make it more difficult or impossible for the Partnership to meet the exception which allows publicly traded partnerships that generate qualifying income to be treated as partnerships (rather than corporations) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, affect or cause us to change our business activities, or affect the tax consequences of an investment in its common units. For example, as discussed above, on January 24, 2017, Final Regulations were published in the Federal Register and apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 19, 2017. The Final Regulations will likely affect the ability of partnerships to continue to qualify as a publicly traded partnership.
Available Information
We make available free of charge on our website, www.suncoke.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains our electronically filed information. Our website also includes our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Governance Guidelines, our Related Persons Transaction Policy and the chartercharters of our Audit Committee.Board Committees.
A copy of any of these documents will be provided without charge upon written request to Investor Relations, SunCoke Energy, Inc., 1011 Warrenville Road, Suite 600, Lisle, Illinois 60532.
14
Table of Contents

Information about our Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers and their ages as of February 15, 2019,24, 2022, were as follows:
Michael G. Rippey64President and Chief Executive Officer
NameAgePosition
Michael G. RippeyKatherine T. Gates6145President and Chief Executive Officer
Fay West49Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Chief FinancialHuman Resources Officer
Katherine T. Gates42Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
P. Michael Hardesty5659Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, Business Development, Terminals and International Coke
Allison S. LausasBonnie M. Edeus3938Vice President, Controller
Shantanu Agrawal35Vice President, Finance and ControllerTreasurer
Gary P. YeawJohn F. Quanci6160Senior Vice President, of Human ResourcesChief Technology Officer
Michael G. Rippey. Mr. Rippey was appointed President andas Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of SunCoke Energy, Inc. on, effective December 1, 2017. Also on December 1, 2017, Mr. RippeyAt that time, he also was named President andappointed as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and appointed as Chairman of the BoardPresident of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC.LLC, the general partner of SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., our former sponsored master limited partnership. Prior to joining SunCoke, Energy, Inc., heMr. Rippey served as Senior Advisor to Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (a leading global steelmaker), since 2015. From 2014 to 2015, he served aswas Chairman of the Board of ArcelorMittal USA LLC (a major domestic steel manufacturer), and from August 2006 through October 2014, he was ArcelorMittal USA LLC’sUSA’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to that, he successfully rose through progressively responsible financial, commercial and administrative leadership roles at ArcelorMittal USA and its predecessor companies. He began his career with Inland Steel Company (a predecessor to ArcelorMittal USA) in 1984.Mr. Rippey currently serves on the Board of Directors of Olympic Steel, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZEUS), a major steel[NASDAQ: ZEUS] (a leading U.S. metals service center headquartered in Ohio,center), where he is a member of the Nominating Committee and serves as Chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee.In addition to ArcelorMittal USA, Mr. Rippey’s previous board service also includes the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Iron & Steel Institute, where he was a past Chairman of the Board.
Fay West.Katherine T. Gates. Ms. WestGates was appointed as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Chief FinancialHuman Resource Officer of SunCoke Energy, Inc. in October 2014.effective November 14, 2019. Prior to that time, she served as Vice President and Controller of SunCoke Energy, Inc. since February 2011. In addition, Ms. West was named Vice President and Controller and appointed to the Board of Directors of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. in July 2012. Prior to joining SunCoke Energy, Inc., she was Assistant Controller at United Continental Holdings, Inc. (an airline holding company) from April 2010 to January 2011. She was Vice President, Accounting and Financial Reporting for PepsiAmericas, Inc. (a manufacturer and distributor of beverage products) from December 2006 through March 2010 and Director of Financial Reporting from December 2005 to December 2006. Ms. West is a director of Quaker Chemical Corporation (a leading manufacturer and supplier of process fluids and specialty chemicals) where she also serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee, and is a member of the Governance Committee.
Katherine T. Gates. Ms. Gates was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer effectiveof SunCoke Energy, Inc. since October 22, 2015. At that time, she also was appointed as a Director of SunCoke Energy Partners GP, LLC.Ms. Gates leads the Company’s environmental and sustainability function, including all Environmental, Social, and Governance matters. Ms. Gates joined SunCoke in February 2013 as Senior Health, Environment and Safety Counsel. She was promoted to Vice President and Assistant General Counsel in July 2014, where she focused on litigation, regulatory and commercial matters. Ms. Gates has been practicing law for two decades, and began her legal career in private practice as a Partner at Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. SheMs. Gates served on the


13
Table of Contents


firm’s Management Committee, where she addressed budget, compensation, commercial, and other issues. Ms. Gates also co-chaired the civil litigation section of the firm’s Litigation Practice Group. In addition, from October 2015 through June 2019, Ms. Gates served as a director of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of our former master limited partnership subsidiary SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P.
P. Michael Hardesty.Mr. Hardesty was appointed Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, Business Development, Terminals and International Coke of SunCoke Energy, Inc., effective October 1, 2015. At that time, he also was appointed as a Director of SunCoke Energy Partners GP, LLC. Mr. Hardesty joined SunCoke Energy, Inc. in 2011 as Senior Vice President, Sales and Commercial Operations, and has more than 30 years of experience in the mining industry. Before joining SunCoke, Mr. Hardesty served as Senior Vice President for International Coal Group, Inc. (“ICG”), where he was responsible for leading the sales and marketing functions and was a key member of the executive management team. Prior to ICG, Mr. Hardesty served as Vice President of Commercial Optimization at Arch Coal, where he developed and executed trade strategies, optimized production output and directed coal purchasing activities. He is a past board member and Secretary-Treasurer of the Putnam County Development Authority in West Virginia. In addition, from October 2015 through June 2019, Mr. Hardesty served as a director of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., our former master limited partnership subsidiary.
Allison S. Lausas. Bonnie M. Edeus. Ms. LausasEdeus was appointed as SunCoke Energy, Inc.’s Vice President and Controller in July, 2021. Ms. Edeus joined the Company in 2013 and has assumed increasing responsibility within financial leadership roles, most recently serving as Assistant Controller since January 2016. Ms. Edeus is a Certified Public Accountant and prior to coming to the Company, she worked in assurance services for BDO USA, LLP, the United States member firm of BDO International, a major global public accounting network, which she joined in 2007.
Shantanu Agrawal.Mr. Agrawal was appointed Vice President, Finance and Controller of both SunCoke Energy, Inc. and SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, in May 2018. Prior to that, from October 2014 to May 2018, Ms. Lausas was Vice President and Controller of both companies, and she served as Assistant Controller prior to 2014. Prior to joining SunCoke Energy, Inc., she worked as an auditor at KPMG LLP, an audit, advisory and tax services firm, from 2002 to 2011, where she served both public and private corporations in the consumer and industrial markets.
Gary P. Yeaw. Mr. Yeaw was appointed Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesTreasurer of SunCoke Energy, Inc. on November 1, 2015.in July, 2021. Prior to that he was Vice President, Human Resources.Director, Financial Performance & Analysis (“FP&A”) and Investor Relations. Mr. Yeaw leadsAgrawal began his career with SunCoke as an FP&A Analyst in 2014. He has been with SunCoke for more than seven years and has increasingly taken on more responsibilities and oversight over that period. Mr. Agrawal is an accomplished finance executive with a rich mix of finance, operations and strategic planning. In his current roles, Mr. Agrawal has led the human resourcesCompany’s finance function, atincluding budgeting, forecasting, financial analysis, cash management and investor relations.
15
Table of Contents

John F. Quanci. Dr. John F. Quanci joined SunCoke Energy, Inc., in October, 2010, and is responsible for key organizational activities.was appointed to his current position as Vice President, Chief Technology Officer in May, 2019. Prior to joining SunCoke, Energy,Dr. Quanci was Director, Corporate Technology of Sunoco, Inc., he was Executive Vice President, Human Resources (a leading transportation fuel provider with interests in logistics). Dr. Quanci has over 30 years of domestic and Communications for Chemtura Corporation. Mr. Yeaw also served as Vice President, Human Resources for American Standard Companies, as well as Vice President, Human Resources Operational Excellenceinternational experience in chargeprocess research, development, plant optimization, manufacturing, rebuilding/turnarounds, and taking new technologies from ideation to full production. Over the course of global benefit programs, labor relations, HR systemshis career, Dr. Quanci has managed several major engineering and employee services. Mr. Yeawtechnology organizations both internal and external to the petroleum industry, including those of: Mobil Research, Mobil Oil, BP/Mobil, Exxon/Mobil, Rodel and Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials (now DuPont Electronic Materials). Dr. Quanci holds professional designations as a Senior Human ResourcesPh.D. in Chemical Engineering from Princeton University and is a registered Professional Certified Compensation ProfessionalEngineer with over one hundred U.S. and was a charter member of the International Society of Employee Benefits Specialists.international patents and patent applications.




14
Table of Contents



Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1A.Risk Factors
In addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC, the following risk factors should be considered in evaluating our business and future prospects. These risk factors represent what we believe to be the known material risk factors with respect to us and our business. Our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition are subject to these risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to vary materially from recent results or from anticipated future results.
These risks are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Risks Inherent in Our Business and Industry
Sustained uncertainty in financial markets, or unfavorable economic conditions in the industries in which our customers operate, may lead to a reduction in the demand for our products and services, and adversely impact our cash flows, financial position or results of operations.
Sustained volatility and disruption in worldwide capital and credit markets in the U.S. and globally could restrict our ability to access the capital market at a time when we would like, or need, to raise capital for our business including for potential acquisitions, or other growth opportunities.
Deteriorating or unfavorable economic conditions in the industries in which our customers operate, such as steelmaking and electric power generation, may lead to reduced demand for steel products, coal, and other bulk commodities which, in turn, could adversely affect the demand for our products and services and negatively impact the revenues, margins and profitability of our business.
Additionally, the tightening of credit, or lack of credit availability to our customers, could adversely affect our ability to collect our trade receivables. We also are exposed to the credit risk of our coke and logistics customers, and any significant unanticipated deterioration of their creditworthiness and resulting increase in nonpayment or nonperformance by them could have a material adverse effect on the cash flows and/or results of our operations.
Adverse developments at our cokemaking and/or logistics operations, including equipment failures or deterioration of assets, may lead to production curtailments, shutdowns, impairments, or additional expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our cokemaking and logistics operations are subject to significant hazards and risks that include, but are not limited to, equipment malfunction, explosions, fires and the effects of severe weather conditions and extreme temperatures, any of which could result in production and transportation difficulties and disruptions, permit non-compliance, pollution, personal injury or wrongful death claims and other damage to our properties and the property of others.
Adverse developments at our cokemaking facilities could significantly disrupt our coke, steam and/or electricity production and our ability to supply coke, steam, and/or electricity to our customers. Adverse developments at our logistics operations could significantly disrupt our ability to provide handling, mixing, storage, terminalling, transloading and/or transportation services, of coal and other dry and liquid bulk commodities, to our customers. Any sustained disruption at our cokemaking and/or logistics operations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
There is a risk of mechanical failure of our equipment both in the normal course of operations and following unforeseen events. Our cokemaking and logistics operations depend upon critical pieces of equipment that occasionally may be out of service for scheduled upgrades or maintenance or as a result of unanticipated failures. Our facilities are subject to equipment failures and the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, accidents or violent weather conditions or extreme temperatures. As a result, we may experience interruptions in our processing and production capabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In particular, to the extent a disruption leads to our failure to maintain the temperature inside our coke oven batteries, we may not be able to maintain the integrity of the ovens or to continue operation of such coke ovens, which could adversely affect our ability to meet our customers’ requirements for coke and, in some cases, electricity and/or steam.


15
Table of Contents


Assets and equipment critical to the operations of our cokemaking and logistics operations also may deteriorate or become depleted materially sooner than we currently estimate. Such deterioration of assets may result in additional maintenance spending or additional capital expenditures. If these assets do not generate the amount of future cash flows that we expect, and we are not able to execute on capital maintenance or procure replacement assets in an economically feasible manner, our future results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Impairment in the carrying value of long-lived assets and goodwill could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We have a significant amount of long-lived assets and goodwill on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived assets must be reviewed for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. We are required to perform impairment tests on our assets whenever events or changes in circumstances lead to a reduction of the estimated useful life or estimated future cash flows that would indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or whenever management’s plans change with respect to those assets.
If business conditions or other factors cause profitability and cash flows to decline, we may be required to record non-cash impairment charges. Goodwill must be evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events indicate it is warranted. If the carrying value of our reporting units exceeds their current fair value as determined based on the discounted future cash flows of the related business, the goodwill is considered impaired and is reduced to fair value by a non-cash charge to earnings.
Events and conditions that could result in impairment in the value of our long-lived assets and goodwill include: the impact of a downturn in the global economy, competition, advances in technology, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, and other factors leading to a reduction in expected long-term sales or profitability, or a significant decline in the trading price of our common stock or market capitalization, lower future cash flows, slower industry growth rates and other changes in the industries in which we or our customers operate.
The financial performance of our cokemaking and logistics businesses is substantially dependent upon a limited number of customers, and the loss of any of these customers, or any failure by them to perform under their contracts with us, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, permit compliance, results of operations and cash flows.
Substantially all of our coke sales currently are made pursuant to long-term contracts with AM USA, U.S.Cliffs Steel and AK Steel, and weU.S. Steel. We expect these three customers to continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. In our logistics business, a significant portion of our revenues and cash flows are derived from long-term contracts with Foresight Energy LLC and Murray American Coal, Inc. at CMT, and we expect these two customers to continue to account for a significant portion of the revenues of our logistics business for the foreseeable future.
We are subject to the credit risk of our major customers and other parties. If we fail to adequately assess the creditworthiness of existing or future customers or unanticipated deterioration of their creditworthiness, any resulting increase in nonpayment or nonperformance by them could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial position or results of operations. During periods of weak demand for steel or coal, our customers may experience significant reductions in their operations, or substantial declines in the prices of the steel, or coal products, they sell. These and other factors such as labor relations or bankruptcy filings may lead certain of our customers to seek renegotiation or cancellation of their existing contractual commitments to us, or reduce their utilization of our services. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.
The loss of any of these customers (or financial difficulties at any of these customers, which result in nonpayment or nonperformance) could have a significant adverse effect on our business. If one or more of these customers were to significantly reduce its purchases of coke or logistics services from us without a make-whole payment, or default on their agreements with us, or terminate or fail to renew their agreements with us, or if we were unable to sell such coke or logistics services to these customers on terms as favorable to us as the terms under our current agreements, our cash flows, financial position, permit compliance, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.


16
Table of Contents


Our cokemaking and logistics businesses are subject to operating risks, some of which are beyond our control, thatcontrol. Equipment failures or deterioration of assets, may lead to production curtailments, shutdowns, impairments, or additional expenditures, which could result inhave a material increase inadverse effect on our operating expenses.results of operations and financial condition.
Factors beyond our control could disrupt our cokemaking and logistics operations, adversely affect our ability to service the needs of our customers and increase our operating costs, all of which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.Adverse developments at our cokemaking facilities could significantly disrupt our ability to produce and supply coke, steam, and/or electricity to our customers.Adverse developments at our logistics operations could significantly disrupt our ability to provide handling, mixing, storage, terminalling, transloading and/or transportation services, of coal and other dry and liquid bulk commodities, to our customers.Our operations depend upon critical pieces of equipment that occasionally may be out of service for scheduled upgrades or maintenance or as a result of unanticipated failures.Assets and equipment critical to these operations also may deteriorate or become depleted materially sooner than we currently estimate, resulting in additional maintenance spending or additional replacement capital expenditures.
16
Table of Contents

Our cokemaking and logistics operations are subject to significant hazards and risks, any of which could result in production and transportation difficulties and disruptions, equipment failures and risk of catastrophic loss, permit non-compliance, pollution, personal injury or wrongful death claims and other damage to our properties and the property of others.Such factors could include:hazards and risks include, but are not limited to
•geological, hydrologic, or other conditions that may cause damage to infrastructure or personnel;
•fire, explosion, or other major incident causing injury to personnel and/or equipment that causes a cessation, or significant curtailment, of all or part of our cokemaking or logicslogistics operations at a site for a period of time;
•processing and plant equipment failures or malfunction, operating hazards and unexpected maintenance problems affecting our cokemaking or logistics operations, or our customers;
•adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as severe winds, heavy rains or snow, flooding, extreme temperatures and other natural events, including those resulting from climate change, affecting our cokemaking or logistics operations, transportation, or our customers; and
•possible legal challenges to the renewal of key permits, which may lead to their renewal on terms that restrict our cokemaking or logistics operations, or impose additional costs on us.
If any of these conditions or events occur, our cokemaking or logistics operations may be disrupted, operating costs could increase significantly and we could incur substantial losses.Such disruptions in our operations could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.In particular, to the extent a disruption leads to our failure to maintain the temperature inside our coke oven batteries, we may not be able to maintain the integrity of the ovens or to continue operation of such coke ovens, which could adversely affect our ability to meet our customers’ requirements for coke and, in some cases, electricity and/or steam.
If our assets do not generate the amount of future cash flows that we expect, or we are not able to execute on capital maintenance or procure replacement assets in an economically feasible manner, our future results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We face competition, both in our cokemaking operations and in our logistics business, which has the potential to reduce demand for our products and services, and that could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We face competition, both in our cokemaking operations and in our logistics business:
•Cokemaking operations: Historically, coke has been used as a main input in the production of steel in blast furnaces. However, some blast furnace operators have relied upon natural gas, pulverized coal, and/or other coke substitutes. Many steelmakers also are exploring alternatives to blast furnace technology that require less or no use of coke.coke or alternatives that reduce the amount of GHG emissions from the process. For example, electric arc furnace technology is a commercially proven process widely used in the U.S.United States. As these alternative processes for production of steel become more widespread, the demand for coke, including the coke we produce, may be significantly reduced. We also face competition from alternative cokemaking technologies, including both by-product and heat recovery technologies. As these technologies improve and as new technologies are developed, competition in the cokemaking industry may intensify. As alternative processes for production of steel become more widespread, the demand for coke, including the coke we produce, may be significantly reduced.
•Logistics business: Decreased throughput and utilization of our logistics assets could result indirectly due to competition in the electrical power generation business from abundant and relatively inexpensive supplies of natural gas displacing thermal coal as a fuel for electrical power generation by utility companies. In addition, competition in the steel industry from processes such as electric arc furnaces, or blast furnace injection of pulverized coal or natural gas, may reduce the demand for metallurgical coals processed through our logistics facilities. In the future, additional coal handling facilities and terminals with rail and/or barge access may be constructed in the Eastern U.S.United States. Such additional facilities could compete directly with us in specific markets now served by our logistics business. Certain coal mining companies and independent terminal operators in some areas may compete directly with our logistics facilities. In some markets, trucks may competitively deliver mined coal to certain shorter-haul destinations, resulting in reduced utilization of existing terminal capacity.
17
Table of Contents

Such competition could reduce demand for our products and services, thus having a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


17
Table of Contents


We are subject to extensive laws and regulations, which may increase our cost of doing business and have an adverse effect on our cash flows, financial position or results of operations.
Our operations are subject to strict regulation by federal, state and local authorities with respect to: discharges of substances into the surrounding environment including the air, water and water;ground; emissions of greenhouse gases, or GHG,GHGs; compliance with the NAAQS,National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes,wastes; cleanup of contaminated sites,sites; protection of groundwater quality and availability,availability; protection of plants and wildlife,wildlife; reclamation and restoration of properties after completion of mining or drilling,drilling; sales of electric power; installation of safety equipment in our facilities, sales of electric power,facilities; and protection of employee health and safety. Complying with these and other regulatory requirements, including the terms of our permits, can be costly and time-consuming, and may hinder operations. In addition, these requirements are complex, change frequently and have become more stringent over time. Regulatory requirements, including those related to GHGs, may change in the future in a manner that could result in substantially increased capital, operating and compliance costs, andwhich could have a material adverse effect on our business.business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations or permits may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations, the suspension or revocation of permits and other enforcement measures that could cause delays in permitting or development of projects or materially limit, or increase the cost of, our operations. We may not have been, or may not be, at all times, in complete compliance with all such requirements, and we may incur material costs or liabilities in connection with such requirements, or in connection with remediation at sites we own, or third-party sites where it has been alleged that we have liability, in excess of the amounts we have accrued. For a description of certain environmental laws and matters applicable to us and associated risks, see “Item 1. Business-Legal and Regulatory Requirements.”
Our operations may impact the environment or cause exposure to hazardous substances, which could result in material liabilities to us.
Our operations result in emissions of various substances to the air, including GHGs, use hazardous materials, and generate solid and hazardous waste. We have in the past and could in the future be subject to claims under federal, state and local laws and regulations arising from these activities, including for the investigation and clean-up of soil, surface water, or groundwater.We previously have been and could again in the future be subject to litigation for alleged bodily injuries or property damage arising from claimed exposure to emissions or hazardous substances allegedly used, released, or disposed of by us, as well as litigation related to climate change by governments, private entities, or individuals. Although we make every effort to avoid litigation, these matters are not totally within our control. We will contest these matters vigorously and have made insurance claims where appropriate, but because of the uncertain nature of litigation and coverage decisions, we cannot predict the outcome of these matters. Environmental impacts resulting from our operations, including exposures to emissions, hazardous substances, or wastes associated with our operations, could result in costs and liabilities that could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be unable to obtain, maintain or renew permits or leases necessary for our operations, which could materially reduce our production, cash flows or profitability.
Our cokemaking and logistics operations require us to obtain a number of permits that impose strict regulations on various environmental and operational matters. These, as well as our facilities and operations (including our generation of electricity), require permits issued by various federal, state and local agencies and regulatory bodies. The permitting rules, and the interpretations of these rules, are complex, change frequently, and are often subject to discretionary interpretations by our regulators, all of which may make compliance more difficult or impractical, and may possibly preclude the continuance of ongoing operations or the development of future cokemaking and/or logistics facilities. Non-governmental organizations, environmental groups and individuals have certain rights to engage in the permitting process, and may comment upon, or object to, the requested permits. Such persons also have the right to bring citizen’s lawsuits to challenge the issuance of permits, or the validity of environmental impact statements related thereto. If any permits or leases are not issued or renewed in a timely fashion or at all, or if permits issued or renewed are conditioned in a manner that restricts our ability to efficiently and economically conduct our operations, our cash flows or profitability could be materially and adversely affected.
Our businesses are subject to inherent risks, some for which we maintain third party insurance and some for which we self-insure. We may incur losses and be subject to liability claims that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
18
Table of Contents

We maintain insurance policies that provide limited coverage for some, but not all, potential risks and liabilities associated with our business. We may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially, and in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. As a result, we may not be able to renew our existing insurance policies or procure other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, certain risks, such as certain environmental and pollution risks, and certain cybersecurity risks, generally are not fully insurable. We must compensate employees for work-related injuries. If we do not make adequate provision for our workers' compensation liabilities, or we are pursued for applicable sanctions, costs, and liabilities, our operations and our profitability could be adversely affected. Even where insurance coverage applies, insurers may contest their obligations to make payments. Our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected by losses and liabilities from un-insured or under-insured events, as well as by delays in the payment of insurance proceeds, or the failure by insurers to make payments.
We may not be able to successfully implement our growth strategies or plans, and we may experience significant risks associated with future acquisitions, investments and/or divestitures. If we are unable to execute our strategic plans, whether as a result of unfavorable market conditions in the industries in which our customers operate, or otherwise, our future results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
A portion of our strategy to grow our business is dependent upon our ability to acquire and operate new assets that result in an increase in our earnings. We may not derive the financial returns we expect on our investment in such additional assets or such operations may not be profitable. We cannot predict the effect that any failed expansion may have on our core businesses. The success of our future acquisitions and/or investments will depend substantially on the accuracy of our analysis concerning such businesses and our ability to complete such acquisitions or investments on favorable terms, as well as to finance such acquisitions or investments and to integrate the acquired operations successfully with existing operations. Risks associated with acquisitions include the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, the potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business, the possible assumption of unknown liabilities, potential disputes with the sellers, and the inherent risks in entering markets or lines of business in which we have limited or no prior experience. Antitrust and other laws may prevent us from completing acquisitions. If we are not able to execute our strategic plans effectively, or successfully integrate new operations, whether as a result of unfavorable market conditions in the industries in which our customers operate, or otherwise, our business reputation could suffer and future results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
In the event we form joint ventures or other similar arrangements, we must pay close attention to the organizational formalities and time-consuming procedures for sharing information and making decisions. We may share ownership and management with other parties who may not have the same goals, strategies, priorities, or resources as we do. The benefits from a successful investment in an existing entity or joint venture will be shared among the co-owners, so we will not receive the exclusive benefits from a successful investment. Additionally, if a co-owner changes, our relationship may be materially and adversely affected.
We regularly review strategic opportunities to further our business objectives, and may eliminate assets that do not meet our return-on-investment criteria. The anticipated benefits of divestitures and other strategic transactions may not be realized, or may be realized more slowly than we expected. Such transactions also could result in a number of financial consequences having a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial position, including reduced cash balances; higher fixed expenses; the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities (including indemnification obligations); restructuring charges; loss of customers, suppliers, distributors, licensors or employees; legal, accounting and advisory fees; and impairment charges.
Impairment in the carrying value of long-lived assets could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have a significant amount of long-lived assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived assets must be reviewed for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. We are required to perform impairment tests on our assets whenever events or changes in circumstances lead to a reduction of the estimated useful life or estimated future cash flows that would indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or whenever management’s plans change with respect to those assets. If business conditions or other factors cause profitability and cash flows to decline, we may be required to record non-cash impairment charges.
Events and conditions that could result in impairment in the value of our long-lived assets include: the impact of a downturn in the global economy, competition, advances in technology, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, and
19
Table of Contents

other factors leading to a reduction in expected long-term sales or profitability, or a significant decline in the trading price of our common stock or market capitalization, lower future cash flows, slower industry growth rates and other changes in the industries in which we or our customers operate.
Our operating results have been and may continue to be affected by fluctuations in our costs of production, and, if we cannot pass increases in our costs of production to our customers, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
Our operations require a reliable supply of equipment, replacement parts and metallurgical coal. If the cost to produce coke and provide logistics services, including cost of supplies, equipment, metallurgical coal or labor, experience significant price inflation and we cannot pass such increases in our costs of production to our customers, our profit margins may be reduced and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
We may incur costs and liabilities resulting from claims for damages to property or injury to persons arising from our operations, and such costs and liabilities could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on the quality, efficacy and safety of our products and services. If our operations do not meet applicable safety standards, or our products or services are found to be unsafe, our relationships with customers could suffer and we could lose business or become subject to liability or claims. In addition, our cokemaking and logistics operations have inherent safety risks that may give rise to events resulting in death, injury, or property loss to employees, customers, or unaffiliated third parties. Depending upon the nature and severity of such events, we could be exposed to significant financial loss, reputational damage, potential civil or criminal government or other regulatory enforcement actions, or private litigation, the settlement or outcome of which could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
New or more stringent greenhouse gas emission standards designed to address climate change and physical effects attributed to climate change may adversely affect our operations and impose significant costs on our business and our customers and suppliers.
There is increasing regulatory attention concerning the issue of climate change and the impact of GHGs, particularly from fossil fuels, which are integral to our cokemaking and logistics businesses. Our businesses arebusiness and operations, as well as the business and operations of our key suppliers and customers, may become subject to inherent risks, somelegislation or regulation intended to limit GHG emissions, the use of fossil fuels or the effects of climate change or may be impacted by the increasing drive towards a lower carbon economy in an effort to limit the impacts of climate change. It is not possible to foresee the details of such legislation or regulations or changes in the economy or their resulting effects on our business. Because our coking process is dependent on coal as a raw material and the coking process generates carbon dioxide, we are limited in our ability to reduce our GHG emissions and could be affected by future regulation of GHGs, although we are evaluating the feasibility of reducing our GHG emissions profile. Any new regulations, legislation or taxes that affect other industries that use coal or other fossil fuels processed through our terminals could reduce throughput and utilization of our logistics assets. Future legislation or regulation regarding climate change and GHG emissions could impose significant costs on our business and our customers and suppliers due to increased energy, capital equipment, emissions controls, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs in order to comply with these laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines to our company and could affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, our suppliers may face cost increases to comply with any new legislation or regulations leading to higher costs to us for goods or services.
Climate change may cause changes in weather patterns and increase the frequency or severity of weather events and flooding. An increase in severe weather events and flooding may adversely impact us, our operations, and our ability to procure raw materials and manufacture and transport our products and could result in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Extreme weather conditions may increase our costs, temporarily impact our production capabilities or cause damage to our facilities. For example, our terminals are located near bodies of water and may be impacted by flooding or hurricanes, disrupting our or our customers' ability to move products. Our coke plants are also generally located near bodies of water and may be impacted by the effects of climate change. Additionally, extreme cold could prevent coal delivery and unloading at our coke plants, impeding operation, or create a more hazardous outdoor working environment for our employees. Severe weather may also adversely impact our suppliers and our customers and their ability to purchase and transport our products.

20
Table of Contents

Investor interest in climate change, fossil fuels, and sustainability could adversely affect our business and our stock price.
Climate change and sustainability have increasingly become important topics to investors and the community at large. As such, there have been recent efforts aimed at the investment community to encourage the divestment of shares of companies associated with energy, coal and/or fossil fuels, as well as to pressure lenders and other financial services companies to limit or curtail business relations with coal and fossil fuel companies. If these efforts are successful, our stock price and our ability to access capital markets may be negatively impacted. Members of the investment community are also increasing their focus on sustainability practices, including management of GHGs and climate change. As a result, we may face increasing pressure regarding our sustainability disclosures and practices.
The COVID-19 pandemic and other possible pandemics and similar outbreaks may disrupt our operations and continue to disrupt our customers’ and suppliers' operations, which could continue to adversely impact our cash flows, financial position and results of operations.
In December 2019, COVID-19, a novel strain of coronavirus surfaced in Wuhan, China. Since then, in 2020, COVID-19 spread to other countries including the U.S. and became a global pandemic. Efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 including social distancing, travel bans and quarantines, have had negative impacts on the U.S. and global economy. The pandemic and response to the pandemic continues to evolve, and any preventative or protective actions that governments or we maintain third party insurancemay take in respect of the pandemic could result in periods of significant business disruption. While our facilities have continued to operate during the COVID-19 pandemic due to our inclusion in the Critical Manufacturing Sector as defined by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, COVID-19 has had, and somemay continue to have, a negative impact on our business and results of operations due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our customers and suppliers. For example, in 2020, certain of our steelmaking and logistics customers were adversely impacted by the idling of manufacturing plants and closed international ports, respectively, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In an effort to assist certain of our steelmaking customers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented volume relief measures by providing near-term coke supply relief for such customers in exchange for extending of certain contracts. In addition, the progression of and global response to COVID-19 increases the risk of delays in construction activities related to our capital projects. The extent of such delays and other effects of COVID-19 on our anticipated investments to upgrade or enhance existing operations and to meet environmental and operational regulations is unknown, but could impact or delay the timing of anticipated benefits on capital projects. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our results of operations, and our customers' and suppliers' results of operations, are out of our control and will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the severity and duration of the pandemic and actions taken to contain it or mitigate its effects, as well as the effectiveness of vaccine rollout plans, the public's perception of the safety of the vaccines and their willingness to take the vaccines. As a result, the ultimate financial impact to SunCoke of the COVID-19 global pandemic cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Cokemaking Business
If a substantial portion of our agreements to supply coke, electricity, and/or steam are modified or terminated, our cash flows, financial position, permit compliance or results of operations may be adversely affected if we self-insure.are not able to replace such agreements, or if we are not able to enter into new agreements at the same level of profitability.
We make substantially all of our coke, electricity and steam sales under long-term agreements. If a substantial portion of these agreements are modified or terminated or if force majeure is exercised, our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are not able to replace such agreements, or if we are not able to enter into new agreements at the same level of profitability. The profitability of our long-term coke, energy and steam sales agreements depends on a variety of factors that vary from agreement to agreement and fluctuate during the agreement term. We may not be able to obtain long-term agreements at favorable prices, compared either to market conditions or to our cost structure. Price changes provided in long-term supply agreements may not reflect actual increases in production costs. As a result, such cost increases may reduce profit margins on our long-term coke and energy sales agreements. In addition, contractual provisions for adjustment or renegotiation of prices and other provisions may increase our exposure to short-term price volatility.
From time to time, we discuss the extension of existing agreements and enter into new long-term agreements for the supply of coke, steam, and energy to our customers, but these negotiations may not be successful and these customers may not continue to purchase coke, steam, or electricity from us under long-term agreements. In addition, declarations of bankruptcy by customers can result in changes in our contracts with less favorable terms. If any one or more of these customers were to become financially distressed and unable to pay us, significantly reduce their purchases of coke, steam, or electricity from us, or if we were unable to sell coke or electricity to them on terms as favorable to us as the terms under our
21
Table of Contents

current agreements, our cash flows, financial position, permit compliance or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Further, because of certain technological design constraints, we do not have the ability to shut down our cokemaking operations if we do not have adequate customer demand. If a customer refuses to take or pay for our coke, we must continue to operate our coke ovens even though we may not be able to sell our coke immediately and may incur lossessignificant additional costs for natural gas to maintain the temperature inside our coke oven batteries and fees under our rail contracts to account for reductions in inbound coal or outbound coke shipments at our plants, which may have a material and adverse effect on our cash flows, financial position or results of operations.
Excess capacity in the global steel industry, and/or increased exports of coke from producing countries, may weaken our customers' demand for our coke and could materially and adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
In some countries steelmaking capacity exceeds demand for steel products. Rather than reducing employment by matching production capacity to consumption, steel manufacturers in these countries (often with local government assistance or subsidies in various forms) may export steel at prices that are significantly below their home market prices and that may not reflect their costs of production or capital. Our steelmaking customers may decrease the prices they charge for steel, or take other action, as the supply of steel increases. The profitability and financial position of our steelmaking customers may be adversely affected, causing such customers to reduce their demand for our coke and making it more likely that they may seek to renegotiate their contracts with us or fail to pay for the coke they are required to take under our contracts. In addition, future increases in exports of coke from China and/or other coke-producing countries also may reduce our customers' demand for coke capacity. Such reduced demand for our coke could adversely affect the certainty of our long-term relationships with our customers depress coke prices, and limit our ability to enter into new, or renew existing, commercial arrangements with our customers, as well as our ability to sell excess capacity in the spot market, and could materially and adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
Certain provisions in our long-term coke agreements may result in economic penalties to us, or may result in termination of our coke sales agreements for failure to meet minimum volume requirements, coal-to-coke yields or other required specifications, and certain provisions in these agreements and our energy sales agreements may permit our customers to suspend performance.
Our agreements for the supply of coke, energy and/or steam, contain provisions requiring us to supply minimum volumes of our products to our customers. To the extent we do not meet these minimum volumes, we are generally required under the terms of our coke sales agreements to procure replacement supply to our customers at the applicable contract price or potentially be subject to liability claimscover damages for any shortfall. If future shortfalls occur, we will work with our customer to identify possible other supply sources while we implement operating improvements at the facility, but we may not be successful in identifying alternative supplies and may be subject to paying the contract price for any shortfall or to cover damages, either of which could adversely affect our future revenues and profitability. Our coke sales agreements also contain provisions requiring us to deliver coke that meets certain quality thresholds. Failure to meet these specifications could result in economic penalties, including price adjustments, the rejection of deliveries or termination of our agreements. To the extent that we do not meet the coal-to-coke yield standard in an agreement, we are responsible for the cost of the excess coal used in the cokemaking process.
Our coke and energy sales agreements contain force majeure provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by our customers for the duration of specified events beyond the control of our customers. Declaration of force majeure, coupled with a lengthy suspension of performance under one or more coke or energy sales agreements, may seriously and adversely affect our cash flows, financial position and results of operations.
Failure to maintain effective quality control systems at our cokemaking facilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,results of operations.
The quality of our coke is critical to the success of our business. For instance, our coke sales agreements contain provisions requiring us to deliver coke that meets certain quality thresholds. If our coke fails to meet such specifications, we could be subject to significant contractual damages or contract terminations, and our sales could be negatively affected. The quality of our coke depends significantly on the effectiveness of our quality control systems, which, in turn, depends on a number of factors, including the design of our quality control systems, our quality-training program, our laboratories and our ability to ensure that our employees adhere to our quality control policies and guidelines. Any significant failure or deterioration of our quality control systems could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
22
Table of Contents

Disruptions to our supply of coal and coal mixing services may reduce the amount of coke we produce and deliver, and if we are not able to cover the shortfall in coal supply or obtain replacement mixing services from other providers, our results of operations and profitability could be adversely affected.
Substantially all of the metallurgical coal used to produce coke at our cokemaking facilities is purchased from third-parties under one-year contracts, except for the Jewell facility, which purchases a substantial portion of its metallurgical coal under a five-year contract with prices reset annually. We cannot assure that there will continue to be an ample supply of metallurgical coal available or cash flows.that these facilities will be supplied without any significant disruption in coke production, as economic, environmental, and other conditions outside of our control may reduce our ability to source sufficient amounts of coal for our forecasted operational needs. If we are not able to make up the shortfalls resulting from such supply failures through purchases of coal from other sources, the failure of our coal suppliers to meet their supply commitments could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and, ultimately, impact the structural integrity of our coke oven batteries.
At our Granite City and Haverhill cokemaking facilities, we rely on third-parties to mix coals that we have purchased into coal mixes that we use to produce coke. We have entered into long-term agreements with coal mixing service providers that are coterminous with our coke sales agreements. However, there are limited alternative providers of coal mixing services and any disruptions from our current service providers could materially and adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, if our rail transportation agreements are terminated, we may have to pay higher rates to access rail lines or make alternative transportation arrangements.
Limitations on the availability and reliability of transportation, and increases in transportation costs, particularly rail systems, could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain a supply of coal and deliver coke to our customers.
Our ability to obtain coal depends primarily on third-party rail systems and to a lesser extent river barges. If we are unable to obtain rail or other transportation services, or are unable to do so on a cost-effective basis, our results of operations could be adversely affected. Alternative transportation and delivery systems are generally inadequate and not suitable to handle the quantity of our shipments or to ensure timely delivery. The loss of access to rail capacity could create temporary disruption until the access is restored, significantly impairing our ability to receive coal and resulting in materially decreased revenues. Our ability to open new cokemaking facilities may also be affected by the availability and cost of rail or other transportation systems available for servicing these facilities.
Our coke production obligations at our Jewell cokemaking facility and one half of our Haverhill cokemaking facility require us to deliver coke to certain customers via railcar. We have entered into long-term rail transportation agreements to meet these obligations. Disruption of these transportation services because of weather-related problems, including those related to climate change, mechanical difficulties, train derailments, infrastructure damage, strikes, lock-outs, lack of fuel or maintenance items, fuel costs, transportation delays, accidents, terrorism, domestic catastrophe or other events could temporarily, or over the long-term, impair our ability to produce coke, and therefore, could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we are unable to effectively protect our intellectual property, third parties may use our technology, which would impair our ability to compete in our markets.
Our future success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain meaningful patent protection for certain of our technologies and products throughout the world. The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain. We rely on patents to protect a significant part our intellectual property portfolio and to enhance our competitive position. However, our presently pending or future patent applications may not issue as patents, and any patent previously issued to us or our subsidiaries may be challenged, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented. Furthermore, the claims in patents that have been issued to us or our subsidiaries or that may be issued to us in the future may not be sufficiently broad to prevent third parties from using cokemaking technologies and heat recovery processes similar to ours. In addition, the laws of various foreign countries in which we plan to compete may not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. If we fail to obtain adequate patent protection for our proprietary technology, our ability to be commercially competitive may be materially impaired.  
We maintain insurance policies that provide limited coverage for some, but not all, potentialare subject to certain political or country risks and liabilities associated with our business. We may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance is excessive relativedue to the risks presented. As a result of market conditions, premiumsVitória, Brazil cokemaking facility that could adversely affect our financial results.
The Vitória cokemaking facility is owned by ArcelorMittal Brazil. We earn income from the Vitória, Brazil operations through licensing and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially,operating fees earned at the Brazilian cokemaking facility payable to us under long-term agreements with ArcelorMittal Brazil. These revenues depend on continuing operations and, in some instances,cases, certain insuranceminimum production levels being achieved at the Vitória cokemaking facility. In the past, the Brazilian economy has been
23
Table of Contents

characterized by frequent and occasionally extensive intervention by the Brazilian government and unstable economic cycles. The Brazilian government has changed in the past, and may become unavailablechange monetary, taxation, credit, tariff and other policies to influence Brazil’s economy in the future. If the operations at the Vitória cokemaking facility are interrupted or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. As a result,if certain minimum production levels are not achieved, we maywill not be able to renew our existing insurance policies or procure other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, certain risks, suchearn the same licensing and operating fees as certain environmental and pollution


18
Table of Contents


risks, and certain cybersecurity risks, generally are not fully insurable. We must compensate employees for work-related injuries. If we do not make adequate provision for our workers' compensation liabilities, or we are pursued for applicable sanctions, costs, and liabilities,currently earning, which could have an adverse effect on our operations and our profitability could be adversely affected. Even where insurance coverage applies, insurers may contest their obligations to make payments. Our financial condition,position, results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, the Vitória, Brazil operations require us to comply with a number of U.S. and international laws and regulations, including those involving anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-fraud. In particular, our international operations are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption laws and regulations, including the regulations imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), which generally prohibits issuers and their strategic or local partners, agents or representatives, which we refer to as our intermediaries (even if those intermediaries are not themselves subject to the FCPA or other similar laws), from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business or obtaining an improper business benefit.
We take precautions to comply with these laws. However, these precautions may not protect us against liability, particularly as a result of actions by our intermediaries through whom we have exposure under these anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-fraud laws even though we may have limited or no ability to control such intermediaries. Any violations of such laws could be punishable by criminal fines, imprisonment, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, injunctions and exclusion from government contracts, as well as other remedial measures. Investigations of alleged violations can be very expensive, disruptive and damaging to our reputation and could negatively impact our stock price. Failure by us or our intermediaries to comply with the foregoing or other anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-fraud laws could adversely impact our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows, damage our reputation and negatively impact our stock price.
Risks Related to Our Logistics Business
The growth and success of our logistics business depends upon our ability to find and contract for adequate throughput volumes, and an extended decline in demand for coal could affect the customers for our logistics business adversely. As a consequence, the operating results and cash flows of our logistics business could be materially and adversely affected.
The financial results of our logistics business segment are significantly affected by lossesthe demand for both thermal coal and liabilitiesmetallurgical coal. An extended decline in our customers’ demand for either thermal or metallurgical coals, including as a result of legislation or regulations promoting renewable energy or limiting carbon emissions from un-insured or under-insured events,the energy sector, could result in a reduced need for the coal mixing, terminalling and transloading services we offer, thus reducing throughput and utilization of our logistics assets. Demand for such coals may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control:
•Thermal coal demand: may be impacted by changes in the energy consumption pattern of industrial consumers, electricity generators and residential users, as well as weather conditions and extreme temperatures. The amount of thermal coal consumed for electric power generation is affected primarily by delaysthe overall demand for electricity, the availability, quality and price of competing fuels for power generation, and governmental regulation. For example, over the past few years, production of natural gas in the paymentU.S. has increased dramatically, which has generally resulted in lower natural-gas prices. As a result of insurance proceeds,sustained low natural gas prices, some coal-fuel generation plants have been displaced by natural-gas fueled generation plants. In addition, state and federal mandates and market demand for increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources, or mandates for the failureretrofitting of existing coal-fired generators with pollution control systems, also could adversely impact the demand for thermal coal. Finally, unusually warm winter weather may reduce the commercial and residential needs for heat and electricity which, in turn, may reduce the demand for thermal coal; and
•Metallurgical coal demand: may be impacted adversely by insurerseconomic downturns resulting in decreased demand for steel and an overall decline in steel production. A decline in blast furnace production of steel may reduce the demand for furnace coke, an intermediate product made from metallurgical coal. Decreased demand for metallurgical coal also may result from increased steel industry utilization of processes that do not use, or reduce the need for, furnace coke, such as electric arc furnaces, or blast furnace injection of pulverized coal or natural gas.
Additionally, fluctuations in the market price of coal can greatly affect production rates and investments by third-parties in the development of new and existing coal reserves. Mining activity may decrease as spot coal prices decrease. We have no control over the level of mining activity by coal producers, which may be affected by prevailing and projected coal prices, demand for hydrocarbons, the level of coal reserves, geological considerations, governmental regulation and the availability and cost of capital. A material decrease in coal mining production in the areas of operation for our logistics
24
Table of Contents

business, whether as a result of depressed commodity prices or otherwise, could result in a decline in the volume of coal processed through our logistics facilities, which would reduce our revenues and operating income.
Decreased demand for thermal or metallurgical coals, and extended or substantial price declines for coal could adversely affect our operating results for future periods and our ability to make payments.
Divestituresgenerate cash flows necessary to improve productivity and expand operations. The cash flows associated with our logistics business may decline unless we are able to secure new volumes of coal or other dry bulk products, by attracting additional customers to these operations. Future growth and profitability of our logistics business segment will depend, in part, upon whether we can contract for additional coal and other bulk commodity volumes at a rate greater than that of any decline in volumes from existing customers. Accordingly, decreased demand for coal, or other bulk commodities, or a decrease in the market price of coal, or other bulk commodities, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of our logistics business.
The geographic location of the Convent Marine Terminal could expose us to potential significant transactionsliabilities, including operational hazards and unforeseen business interruptions, that could substantially and adversely affect our future financial performance.
CMT is located in the Gulf Coast region, and its operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions, including interruptions from hurricanes, floods, or other potential effects of climate change, which have historically impacted the region with some regularity. If any of these events were to occur, we could incur substantial losses because of personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, and pollution or other environmental damage resulting in curtailment or suspension of our related operations.
Risks Related to Indebtedness
We face material debt maturities which may adversely affect our business. In particular, ifconsolidated financial position.
Over the next five years, we are unablehave $127 million of total consolidated debt maturing. See Note 12 to realize the anticipated benefits from such transactions, or are unable to conclude such transactions upon favorable terms, ourconsolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be adversely affected.
We regularly review strategic opportunities to further our business objectives, and may eliminate assets that do not meet our return-on-investment criteria. If we are unable to complete such divestitures or other transactions upon favorable terms, or in a timely manner, or if the market conditions assumed in our project economics deteriorate, our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be adversely affected.
The anticipated benefits of divestitures and other strategic transactions may not be realized, or may be realized more slowly than we expected. Such transactions also could result in a number of financial consequences having a material effect on our results of operations and our financial position, including reduced cash balances; higher fixed expenses; the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities (including indemnification obligations); restructuring charges; loss of customers, suppliers, distributors, licensors or employees; legal, accounting and advisory fees; and impairment charges.
statements. We may not be able to successfully implementrefinance this debt, or may be forced to do so on terms substantially less favorable than our growth strategiescurrently outstanding debt. We may be forced to delay or plans,not make capital expenditures, which may adversely affect our competitive position and financial results.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit facilities and other debt documents.
Subject to the limits contained in our credit agreements and our other debt instruments, we may experiencebe able to incur additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our level of debt could intensify. Specifically, a higher level of debt could have important consequences, including:
•making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes and our other debt;
•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;
•requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for the payment of dividends, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
•increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the credit facilities, are at variable rates of interest;
•limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete;
•placing us at a competitive disadvantage to other, less leveraged competitors; and
•increasing our cost of borrowing.
In addition, the credit agreement governing our credit facilities contains restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities (such as incurring additional debt) that may be in our long-term best interest. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all our debt. In the event of an acceleration of all our debt, we may not have sufficient cash on hand to repay the indebtedness in full. Such event could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

25
Table of Contents

Our level of indebtedness may increase, reducing our financial flexibility.
In the future, we may incur significant risks associated withindebtedness in order to make future acquisitions and/or investments. Ifto develop or expand our facilities. Our level of indebtedness could affect our operations in several ways, including the following:
•a significant portion of our cash flows could be used to service our indebtedness;
•a high level of debt would increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•the covenants contained in the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness will limit our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of assets, pay distributions and make certain investments;
•a high level of debt may place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged, and therefore may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our indebtedness would prevent us from pursuing;
•our debt covenants may also affect our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in the economy and our industry; and
•a high level of debt may impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, distributions or for general corporate or other purposes.
A high level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations. Our ability to meet our debt obligations and to reduce our level of indebtedness depends on our future performance. General economic conditions and financial, business and other factors affect our operations and our future performance. Many of these factors are unablebeyond our control. We may not be able to executegenerate sufficient cash flows to pay the interest on our strategic plans, whetherdebt, and future working capital, borrowings or equity financing may not be available to pay or refinance such debt. Factors that will affect our ability to raise cash through an offering of our common stock or a refinancing of our debt include financial market conditions, the value of our assets and our performance at the time we need capital.
Risks Related to Our Legacy Coal Mining Business
Our former coal mining operations were subject to governmental regulations pertaining to employee health and safety and mandated benefits for retired coal miners. Following the divestiture of our coal mining operations, compliance with such regulations has continued to impose significant costs on our business.
Our former coal mining operations were subject to strict regulation by federal, state and local authorities with respect to environmental matters such as reclamation, and to matters such as employee health and safety and mandated benefits for retired coal miners. Even after divestiture of our coal mining business, compliance with these reclamation and benefits requirements has continued to impose significant costs on us. As a resultformer coal mine operator, federal law requires us to secure payment of federal black lung benefits to claimants who were employees, and to contribute to a trust fund for payment of benefits and medical expenses to claimants who last worked in the coal industry before January 1, 1970. At December 31, 2021, our liabilities for coal workers’ black lung benefits totaled $63.3 million. Our business could be materially and adversely harmed if these liabilities, including the number and award size of claims, were increased. See “Item 1. Business-Legal and Regulatory Requirements-Other Regulatory Requirements.”
General Risks
Sustained uncertainty in financial markets, or unfavorable marketeconomic conditions in the industries in which our customers operate, or otherwise,may lead to a reduction in the demand for our futureproducts and services, and adversely impact our cash flows, financial position or results of operationsoperations.
Sustained volatility and disruption in worldwide capital and credit markets in the U.S. and globally could be materially and adversely affected.
A portion of our strategy to grow our business is dependent uponrestrict our ability to acquire and operate new assets that result in an increase inaccess the capital market at a time when we would like, or need, to raise capital for our earnings. We may not derive the financial returns we expect on our investment in such additional assets or such operations may not be profitable. We cannot predict the effect that any failed expansion may have on our core businesses. The success of our future acquisitions and/or investments will depend substantially on the accuracy of our analysis concerning such businesses and our ability to complete suchbusiness including for potential acquisitions, or investments on favorable terms, as well as to finance such acquisitionsother growth opportunities.
Deteriorating or investments and to integrate the acquired operations successfully with existing operations. Antitrust and other laws may prevent us from completing acquisitions. If we are not able to execute our strategic plans effectively, or successfully integrate new operations, whether as a result of unfavorable marketeconomic conditions in the industries in which our customers operate, or otherwise,such as steelmaking and electric power generation, may lead to reduced demand for steel products, coal, and other bulk commodities which, in turn, could adversely affect the demand for our business reputation could sufferproducts and future results of operations could be materiallyservices and adversely affected.
We may experience significant risks associated with future acquisitions and/or investments.
The successnegatively impact the revenues, margins and profitability of our future acquisitions and/or investments will depend substantially on the accuracy of our analysis concerning such businesses and our ability to complete such acquisitions or investments on favorable terms, as well as to finance such acquisitions or investments and to integrate the acquired operations successfully with existing operations. Antitrust and other laws may prevent us from completing acquisitions. If we are unable to integrate new operations successfully, our financial results and business reputation could suffer.business.
Risks associated with acquisitions include the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, the potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business, the possible assumption of unknown liabilities, potential disputes with the sellers, and the inherent risks in entering markets or lines of business in which we have limited or no prior experience. Additionally, in the event we form joint ventures or other similar arrangements, we must pay close attention to the organizational formalities and time-consuming procedures for sharing information and making decisions. We may share ownership and management with other parties who may not have the same goals, strategies, priorities, or resources as we do. The benefits from a successful investment in an existing entity or joint venture will be shared among the co-owners, so we will not receive the exclusive benefits from a successful investment. Additionally, if a co-owner changes, our relationship may be materially and adversely affected.
Security breaches and other information systems failures could disrupt our operations, compromise the integrity of our data, expose us to liability, cause increased expenses and cause our reputation to suffer, any or all of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business or financial position.
Our business is dependent on financial, accounting and other data processing systems and other communications and information systems, including our enterprise resource planning tools. We process a large number of transactions on a



26
19
Table of Contents



daily basis and rely upon the proper functioning of computer systems. If a key system were to fail or experience unscheduled downtime for any reason, our operations and financial results could be affected adversely. Our systems could be damaged or interrupted by a security breach, terrorist attack, fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure or similar event.  Our disaster recovery plans may not entirely prevent delays or other complications that could arise from an information systems failure. Our business interruption insurance may not compensate us adequately for losses that may occur.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data in our data centers, on our networks, and in our cloud vendors.  In addition, we rely on third party service providers, for support of our information technology systems, including the maintenance and integrity of proprietary business information and other confidential company information and data relating to customers, suppliers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy.  We have instituted data security measures for confidential company information and data stored on electronic and computing devices, whether owned or leased by us or a third party vendor. However, despite such measures, there are risks associated with customer, vendor, and other third-party access and our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to: employee error or malfeasance, failure of third parties to meet contractual, regulatory and other obligations to us, or other disruptions. 
Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen.  Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties, disrupt our operations, and damage our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business and financial position.
We are exposed to, and may be adversely affected by, interruptions to our computer and information technology systems and sophisticated cyber-attacks.
We rely on our information technology systems and networks in connection with many of our business activities. Some of these networks and systems are managed by third-party service providers and are not under our direct control. Our operations routinely involve receiving, storing, processing and transmitting sensitive information pertaining to our business, customers, dealers, suppliers, employees and other sensitive matters. Cyber-attacks could materially disrupt operational systems; result in loss of trade secrets or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information; compromise personally identifiable information regarding customers or employees; and jeopardize the security of our facilities. A cyber-attack could be caused by malicious outsiders using sophisticated methods to circumvent firewalls, encryption and other security defenses. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Information technology security threats, including security breaches, computer malware and other cyber-attacks are increasing in both frequency and sophistication and could create financial liability, subject us to legal or regulatory sanctions or damage our reputation with customers, dealers, suppliers and other stakeholders. We continuously seek to maintain a robust program of information security and controls, but a cyber-attack could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. As cyber-attacks continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.
We are or may become subject to privacy and data protection laws, rules and directives relating to the processing of personal data in the countries where we operate.
The growth of cyber-attacks has resulted in an evolving legal landscape which imposes costs that are likely to increase over time. For example, new laws and regulations governing data privacy and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and recent California legislation (which, among other things, provides for a private right of action), pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and could potentially elevate our costs over time. Any failure by us to comply with such laws and regulations could result in penalties and liabilities. It is also possible under certain legislation that if we acquire a company that has violated or is not in compliance with applicable data protection laws, we may incur significant liabilities and penalties as a result.



20
Table of Contents


Our operating results have been and may continue to be affected by fluctuations in our costs of production, and, if we cannot pass increases in our costs of production to our customers, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
Our operations require a reliable supply of equipment, replacement parts and metallurgical coal. If the cost to produce coke and provide logistics services, including cost of supplies, equipment, metallurgical coal, labor, experience significant price inflation, and we cannot pass such increases in our costs of production to our customers, our profit margins may be reduced and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
Labor disputes with the unionized portion of our workforce could affect us adversely. Union represented labor creates an increased risk of work stoppages and higher labor costs.
We rely, at one or more of our facilities, on unionized labor, and there is always the possibility that we may be unable to reach agreement on terms and conditions of employment or renewal of a collective bargaining agreement. When collective bargaining agreements expire or terminate, we may not be able to negotiate new agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements, or at all, and without production interruptions, including labor stoppages. If we are unable to negotiate the renewal of a collective bargaining agreement before its expiration date, our operations and our profitability could be adversely affected. A prolonged labor dispute, which may include a work stoppage, could adversely affect our ability to satisfy our customers’ orders and, as a result, adversely affect our operations, or the stability of production and reduce our future revenues, or profitability. It is also possible that, in the future, additional employee groups may choose to be represented by a labor union.
Our ability to operate our company effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.
We have implemented recruitment, training and retention efforts to optimally staff our operations. Our ability to operate our business and implement our strategies depends in part on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract and retain other qualified personnel. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees or the inability to attract or retain other qualified personnel in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business or business prospects. With respect to our represented employees, we may be adversely impacted by the loss of employees who retire or obtain other employment during a layoff or a work stoppage.
We currently are, and likely will be, subject to litigation, the disposition of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial position or results of operations.
The nature of our operations exposes us to possible litigation claims in the future, including disputes relating to our operations and commercial and contractual arrangements. Although we make every effort to avoid litigation, these matters are not totally within our control. We will contest these matters vigorously and have made insurance claims where appropriate, but because of the uncertain nature of litigation and coverage decisions, we cannot predict the outcome of these matters. Litigation is very costly, and the costs associated with prosecuting and defending litigation matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and profitability. In addition, our profitability or cash flow in a particular period could be affected by an adverse ruling in any litigation currently pending in the courts or by litigation that may be filed against us in the future. We are also subject to significant environmental and other government regulation, which sometimes results in various administrative proceedings. For additional information, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”
Risks Related to Indebtedness
We own a significant equity interest in the Partnership, and our consolidated financial statements include the Partnership’s substantial indebtedness. If effective control of the Partnership’s general partner is transferred to a third party, the Partnership’s indebtedness could become due and payable, which would materially and adversely affect our consolidated financial position.
Due to our significant equity ownership interest in the Partnership, our consolidated financial statements include the Partnership’s indebtedness.  If effective control of the Partnership’s general partner is transferred to a third party, resulting in the Partnership’s aggregate indebtedness becoming payable, our consolidated financial position would be materially and adversely affected.
If effective control of the Partnership’s general partner is transferred to a third party, the Partnership, pursuant to the indenture for its outstanding senior secured notes, could be required to repurchase such notes in an amount equal to 101 percent of the aggregate principal amount outstanding, which was $700.0 million at December 31, 2018. Under the Partnership’s revolving credit agreement, the lenders could declare the loansSecurity breaches and other amounts (including letter of credit obligations), totaling $106.9 million at December 31, 2018, to be immediately due and payable.


21
Table of Contents


The Partnership faces material debt maturities which may adversely affectinformation systems failures could disrupt our consolidated financial position.
Overoperations, compromise the next five years, we have approximately $159 million of total consolidated debt maturing at SunCoke and the Partnership. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. We may not be able to refinance this debt, or may be forced to do so on terms substantially less favorable than our currently outstanding debt. We may be forced to delay or not make capital expenditures, which may adversely affect our competitive position and financial results.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit facilities and other debt documents.
Subject to the limits contained in our credit agreements, and our other debt instruments, we may be able to incur additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our level of debt could intensify. Specifically, a higher level of debt could have important consequences, including:
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes and our other debt;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;
requiring a substantial portionintegrity of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for the payment of dividends, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the credit facilities, are at variable rates of interest;
limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to other, less leveraged competitors; and
increasing our cost of borrowing.
In addition, the credit agreement governing our credit facilities contains restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities (such as incurring additional debt) that may be in our long-term best interest. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all our debt.
Our level of indebtedness may increase, reducing our financial flexibility.
In the future, we may incur significant indebtedness in order to make future acquisitions or to develop or expand our facilities. Our level of indebtedness could affect our operations in several ways, including the following:
a significant portion of our cash flows could be used to service our indebtedness;
a high level of debt would increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
the covenants contained in the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness will limit our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of assets, pay distributions and make certain investments;
a high level of debt may place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged, and therefore may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our indebtedness would prevent us from pursuing;
our debt covenants may also affect our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in the economy and our industry; and
a high level of debt may impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, distributions or for general corporate or other purposes.
A high level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations. Our ability to meet our debt obligations and to reduce our level of indebtedness depends on our future performance. General economic conditions and financial, business and other factors affect our operations and our future performance. Many of these factors are beyond our control. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to pay the interest on our debt, and future working capital, borrowings or equity financing may not be available to pay or refinance such debt. Factors that will affect our ability to raise cash through an offering of our units or a refinancing of our debt include financial market conditions, the value of our assets and our performance at the time we need capital.


22
Table of Contents


Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.
Borrowings under the credit facilities are at variable rates of interest anddata, expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase,liability, cause increased expenses and cause our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness will increase even though the amount borrowed remains the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, will correspondingly decrease. From timereputation to time, we may enter into, interest rate swaps that involve the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility.
Rating agencies may downgrade our credit ratings, which would make it more difficult for us to raise capital and would increase our financing costs.
Any downgrades in our credit ratings may make raising capital more difficult, may increase the cost and affect the terms of future borrowings, may affect the terms under which we purchase goods and services and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities.
Risks Related to Our Cokemaking Business
If a substantial portion of our agreements to supply coke, electricity, and/suffer, any or steam are modified or terminated, our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are not able to replace such agreements, or if we are not able to enter into new agreements at the same level of profitability.
We make substantially all of our coke, electricity and steam sales under long-term agreements. If a substantial portion of these agreements are modified or terminated or if force majeure is exercised, our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are not able to replace such agreements, or if we are not able to enter into new agreements at the same level of profitability. The profitability of our long-term coke, energy and steam sales agreements depends on a variety of factors that vary from agreement to agreement and fluctuate during the agreement term. We may not be able to obtain long-term agreements at favorable prices, compared either to market conditions or to our cost structure. Price changes provided in long-term supply agreements may not reflect actual increases in production costs. As a result, such cost increases may reduce profit margins on our long-term coke and energy sales agreements. In addition, contractual provisions for adjustment or renegotiation of prices and other provisions may increase our exposure to short-term price volatility.
From time to time, we discuss the extension of existing agreements and enter into new long-term agreements for the supply of coke, steam, and energy to our customers, but these negotiations may not be successful and these customers may not continue to purchase coke, steam, or electricity from us under long-term agreements. In addition, declarations of bankruptcy by customers can result in changes in our contracts with less favorable terms. If any one or more of these customers were to become financially distressed and unable to pay us, significantly reduce their purchases of coke, steam, or electricity from us, or if we were unable to sell coke or electricity to them on terms as favorable to us as the terms under our current agreements, our cash flows, financial position, permit compliance, or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Further, because of certain technological design constraints, we do not have the ability to shut down our cokemaking operations if we do not have adequate customer demand. If a customer refuses to take or pay for our coke, we must continue to operate our coke ovens even though we may not be able to sell our coke immediately and may incur significant additional costs for natural gas to maintain the temperature inside our coke oven batteries and fees under our rail contracts to account for reductions in inbound coal or outbound coke shipments at our plants, which maycould have a material and adverse effect on our cash flows,business or financial positionposition.
Our business is dependent on financial, accounting and other data processing systems and other communications and information systems, including our enterprise resource planning tools. We process a large number of transactions on a daily basis and rely upon the proper functioning of computer systems. If a key system were to fail or experience unscheduled downtime for any reason, our operations and financial results could be affected adversely. Our systems could be damaged or interrupted by a security breach, terrorist attack, fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure or similar event.  Our disaster recovery plans may not entirely prevent delays or other complications that could arise from an information systems failure. Our business interruption insurance may not compensate us adequately for losses that may occur.
In the ordinary course of operations.our business, we collect and store sensitive data in our data centers, on our networks, and in our cloud vendors.  In addition, we rely on third party service providers, for support of our information technology systems, including the maintenance and integrity of proprietary business information and other confidential company information and data relating to customers, suppliers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy.  We have instituted data security measures for confidential company information and data stored on electronic and computing devices, whether owned or leased by us or a third party vendor. However, despite such measures, there are risks associated with customer, vendor, and other third-party access and our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to: employee error or malfeasance, failure of third parties to meet contractual, regulatory and other obligations to us, or other disruptions. 
The coke sales agreementAny such breach could compromise our networks and the energy sales agreement with AK Steel at our Haverhill II facility are subject to early termination under certain circumstances and anyinformation stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen.  Any such termination coupled with our inability to market the coke at similar pricesaccess, disclosure or other loss of information could adversely affect our financial position.
The coke sales agreement and the energy sales agreement with AK Steel at our Haverhill II facility are subject to early termination by AK Steel upon satisfaction of two criteria. The Haverhill coke sales agreement with AK Steel expires on December 31, 2021. The Haverhill energy sales agreement with AK Steel runs concurrently with the term of the coke sales agreement, including any renewals, and automatically terminates upon the termination of the related coke sales agreement. Since January 1, 2014, the coke sales agreement may be terminated by AK Steel at any time onresult in legal claims or after upon two years prior written notice, if AK Steel (i) permanently shuts down operation of the iron producing portion at its steel mill in Ashland, Kentucky (the Ashland Works Plant) and (ii) has not acquired or begun construction of a new blast furnace in the U.S. to replace, in whole or in part, the Ashland Works Plant’s iron production capacity. If AK Steel were able to satisfy both criteria and chose to elect early termination, AK Steel must provide two years advance notice of the

proceedings,

27
23
Table of Contents



termination. Duringliability under laws that protect the two year notice period, AK Steel must continue to perform in full under the termsprivacy of the coke sales agreementpersonal information, and energy sales agreement. On January 28, 2019, AK Steel announced its intention to permanently close its Ashland Works Plant by the end of 2019. Were the Ashland Works Plant to permanently shut down, we believe AK Steel has notregulatory penalties, disrupt our operations, and would not satisfy the second criterion.
If AK Steel were to terminate the coke sales agreement and we were unable to enter into similar long-term contracts with replacement customers for the coke previously purchased by AK Steel, then we may be forced to sell some or all of the previously contracted coke in the spot market.
Excess capacity in the global steel industry, and/or increased exports of coke from producing countries, may weakendamage our customers' demand for our coke andreputation, which could materially and adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
In some countries steelmaking capacity exceeds demand for steel products. Rather than reducing employment by matching production capacity to consumption, steel manufacturers in these countries (often with local government assistance or subsidies in various forms) may export steel at prices that are significantly below their home market prices and that may not reflect their costs of production or capital. Our steelmaking customers, may decrease the prices they charge for steel, or take other action, as the supply of steel increases. The profitabilitybusiness and financial position of our steelmaking customersposition.
We are exposed to, and may be adversely affected causing suchby, interruptions to our computer and information technology systems and sophisticated cyber-attacks.
We rely on our information technology systems and networks in connection with many of our business activities. Some of these networks and systems are managed by third-party service providers and are not under our direct control. Our operations routinely involve receiving, storing, processing and transmitting sensitive information pertaining to our business, customers, dealers, suppliers, employees and other sensitive matters. Cyber-attacks could materially disrupt operational systems; result in loss of trade secrets or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information; compromise personally identifiable information regarding customers or employees; and jeopardize the security of our facilities. A cyber-attack could be caused by malicious outsiders using sophisticated methods to reduce their demand forcircumvent firewalls, encryption and other security defenses. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Information technology security threats, including security breaches, computer malware and other cyber-attacks are increasing in both frequency and sophistication and could create financial liability, subject us to legal or regulatory sanctions or damage our cokereputation with customers, dealers, suppliers and making it more likely that they mayother stakeholders. We continuously seek to renegotiate their contracts with us or fail to pay for the coke they are required to take under our contracts. In addition, future increases in exportsmaintain a robust program of coke from China and/or other coke-producing countries also may reduce our customers' demand for coke capacity. Such reduced demand for our coke could adversely affect the certainty of our long-term relationships with our customers depress coke prices,information security and limit our ability to enter into new, or renew existing, commercial arrangements with our customers, as well as our ability to sell excess capacity in the spot market, and could materially and adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
Income from operation of the Vitória, Brazil cokemaking facility may be affected by global and regional economic and political factors and the policies and actions of the Brazilian government.
The Vitória cokemaking facility is owned ArcelorMittal Brazil. We earn income from the Vitória, Brazil operations through licensing and operating fees earned at the Brazilian cokemaking facility payable to us under long-term agreements with ArcelorMittal Brazil. These revenues depend on continuing operations and, in some cases, certain minimum production levels being achieved at the Vitória cokemaking facility. In the past, the Brazilian economy has been characterized by frequent and occasionally extensive intervention by the Brazilian government and unstable economic cycles. The Brazilian government has changed in the past, and may change monetary, taxation, credit, tariff and other policies to influence Brazil’s economy in the future. If the operations at Vitória cokemaking facility are interrupted or if certain minimum production levels are not achieved, we will not be able to earn the same licensing and operating fees as we are currently earning, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Certain provisions in our long-term coke agreements may result in economic penalties to us, or may result in termination of our coke sales agreements for failure to meet minimum volume requirements or other required specifications, and certain provisions in these agreements and our energy sales agreements may permit our customers to suspend performance.
Our agreements for the supply of coke, energy and/or steam, contain provisions requiring us to supply minimum volumes of our products to our customers. To the extent we do not meet these minimum volumes, we are generally required under the terms of our coke sales agreements to procure replacement supply to our customers at the applicable contract price or potentially be subject to cover damages for any shortfall. If future shortfalls occur, we will work with our customer to identify possible other supply sources while we implement operating improvements at the facility,controls, but we may not be successful in identifying alternative supplies and may be subject to paying the contract price for any shortfall or to cover damages, either of which could adversely affect our future revenues and profitability. Our coke sales agreements also contain provisions requiring us to deliver coke that meets certain quality thresholds. Failure to meet these specifications could result in economic penalties, including price adjustments, the rejection of deliveries or termination of our agreements.
Our coke and energy sales agreements contain force majeure provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by our customers for the duration of specified events beyond the control of our customers. Declaration of force majeure, coupled with a lengthy suspension of performance under one or more coke or energy sales agreements, may seriously and adversely affect our cash flows, financial position and results of operations.


24
Table of Contents


To the extent we do not meet coal-to-coke yield standards in our coke sales agreements, we are responsible for the cost of the excess coal used in the cokemaking process, which could adversely impact our results of operations and profitability.
Our ability to pass through our coal costs to our customers under our coke sales agreements is generally subject to our ability to meet some form of coal-to-coke yield standard. To the extent that we do not meet the yield standard in the contract, we are responsible for the cost of the excess coal used in the cokemaking process. We may not be able to meet the yield standards at all times, and as a result we may suffer lower margins on our coke sales and our results of operations and profitability could be adversely affected.
Failure to maintain effective quality control systems at our cokemaking facilitiescyber-attack could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The quality of our coke is critical to the success of our business. For instance, our coke sales agreements contain provisions requiring us to deliver coke that meets certain quality thresholds. If our coke fails to meet such specifications, we could be subject to significant contractual damages or contract terminations, and our sales could be negatively affected. The quality of our coke depends significantly on the effectiveness of our quality control systems, which, in turn, depends on a number of factors, including the design of our quality control systems, our quality-training program, our laboratories and our ability to ensure that our employees adhere to our quality control policies and guidelines. Any significant failure or deterioration of our quality control systems could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
If we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from planned maintenance activities, oven re-builds, and additional measures to control costs at our Indiana Harbor cokemaking operations, our future financial performance,competitive position, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Since the third quarter of 2015, when we implemented a plan to address deteriorating coke oven conditions and improve plant performance, and environmental compliance at our Indiana Harbor cokemaking operations, we have rebuilt approximately 80 percent of the coke ovens at that facility. However, unexpected costs and challenges may arise and there is a risk of continuing mechanical failures and deterioration of assets leading to production curtailments, shutdowns or additional expenditures at our Indiana Harbor operations, any or all of which could significantly disrupt our coke production and our ability to supply coke to our customer.
If the implementation of these systematic planned maintenance activities to improve operating performance of the remaining ovens to be rebuilt at Indiana Harbor (and related additional measures to control and benchmark costs) do not produce the expected benefits, our future financial performance, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Disruptions to our supply of coal and coal mixing services may reduce the amount of coke we produce and deliver, and if we are not able to cover the shortfall in coal supply or obtain replacement mixing services from other providers, our results of operations and profitability could be adversely affected.
Substantially all of the metallurgical coal used to produce coke at our cokemaking facilities, is purchased from third-parties under one-year contracts, except for the Jewell facility, which purchases a substantial portion of its metallurgical coal under a five-year contract with prices reset annually. We cannot assure that there willflows. As cyber-attacks continue to be an ample supply of metallurgical coal available or that these facilities will be supplied without any significant disruption in coke production, as economic, environmental, and other conditions outside of our control may reduce our ability to source sufficient amounts of coal for our forecasted operational needs. Ifevolve, we are not able to make up the shortfalls resulting from such supply failures through purchases of coal from other sources, the failure of our coal suppliers to meet their supply commitments could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and, ultimately, impact the structural integrity of our coke oven batteries.
At our Granite City and Haverhill cokemaking facilities, we rely on third-parties to mix coals that we have purchased into coal mixes that we use to produce coke. We have entered into long-term agreements with coal mixing service providers that are coterminous with our coke sales agreements. However, there are limited alternative providers of coal mixing services and any disruptions from our current service providers could materially and adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, if our rail transportation agreements are terminated, we may have to pay higher rates to access rail lines or make alternative transportation arrangements.
Limitations on the availability and reliability of transportation, and increases in transportation costs, particularly rail systems, could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain a supply of coal and deliver coke to our customers.


25
Table of Contents


Our ability to obtain coal depends primarily on third-party rail systems and to a lesser extent river barges. If we are unable to obtain rail or other transportation services, or are unable to do so on a cost-effective basis, our results of operations could be adversely affected. Alternative transportation and delivery systems are generally inadequate and not suitable to handle the quantity of our shipments or to ensure timely delivery. The loss of access to rail capacity could create temporary disruption until the access is restored, significantly impairing our ability to receive coal and resulting in materially decreased revenues. Our ability to open new cokemaking facilities may also be affected by the availability and cost of rail or other transportation systems available for servicing these facilities.
Our coke production obligations at our Jewell cokemaking facility and one half of our Haverhill cokemaking facility require us to deliver coke to certain customers via railcar. We have entered into long-term rail transportation agreements to meet these obligations. Disruption of these transportation services because of weather-related problems, mechanical difficulties, train derailments, infrastructure damage, strikes, lock-outs, lack of fuel or maintenance items, fuel costs, transportation delays, accidents, terrorism, domestic catastrophe or other events could temporarily, or over the long-term, impair our ability to produce coke, and therefore, could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we are unable to effectively protect our intellectual property, third parties may use our technology, which would impair our ability to compete in our markets.
Our future success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain meaningful patent protection for certain of our technologies and products throughout the world. The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain. We rely on patents to protect a significant part our intellectual property portfolio and to enhance our competitive position. However, our presently pending or future patent applications may not issue as patents, and any patent previously issued to us or our subsidiaries may be challenged, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented. Furthermore, the claims in patents that have been issued to us or our subsidiaries or that may be issued to us in the future may not be sufficiently broad to prevent third parties from using cokemaking technologies and heat recovery processes similar to ours. In addition, the laws of various foreign countries in which we plan to compete may not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. If we fail to obtain adequate patent protection for our proprietary technology, our ability to be commercially competitive may be materially impaired.  
Risks Related to Our Logistics Business
The growth and success of our logistics business depends upon our ability to find and contract for adequate throughput volumes, and an extended decline in demand for coal could affect the customers for our logistics business adversely. As a consequence, the operating results and cash flows of our logistics business could be materially and adversely affected.
The financial results of our logistics business segment are significantly affected by the demand for both thermal coal and metallurgical coal. An extended decline in our customers’ demand for either thermal or metallurgical coals could result in a reduced need for the coal mixing, terminalling and transloading services we offer, thus reducing throughput and utilization of our logistics assets. Demand for such coals may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control:
Thermal coal demand: may be impacted by changes in the energy consumption pattern of industrial consumers, electricity generators and residential users, as well as weather conditions and extreme temperatures. The amount of thermal coal consumed for electric power generation is affected primarily by the overall demand for electricity, the availability, quality and price of competing fuels for power generation, and governmental regulation. For example, over the past few years, production of natural gas in the U.S. has increased dramatically, which has resulted in lower natural-gas prices. As a result of sustained low natural gas prices, coal-fuel generation plants have been displaced by natural-gas fueled generation plants. In addition, state and federal mandates for increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources, or the retrofitting of existing coal-fired generators with pollution control systems, also could adversely impact the demand for thermal coal. Finally, unusually warm winter weather may reduce the commercial and residential needs for heat and electricity which, in turn, may reduce the demand for thermal coal; and
Metallurgical coal demand: may be impacted adversely by economic downturns resulting in decreased demand for steel and an overall decline in steel production. A decline in blast furnace production of steel may reduce the demand for furnace coke, an intermediate product made from metallurgical coal. Decreased demand for metallurgical coal also may result from increased steel industry utilization of processes that do not use, or reduce the need for, furnace coke, such as electric arc furnaces, or blast furnace injection of pulverized coal or natural gas.


26
Table of Contents


Additionally, fluctuations in the market price of coal can greatly affect production rates and investments by third-parties in the development of new and existing coal reserves. Mining activity may decrease as spot coal prices decrease. We have no control over the level of mining activity by coal producers, which may be affected by prevailing and projected coal prices, demand for hydrocarbons, the level of coal reserves, geological considerations, governmental regulation and the availability and cost of capital. A material decrease in coal mining production in the areas of operation for our logistics business, whether as a result of depressed commodity prices or otherwise, could result in a decline in the volume of coal processed through our logistics facilities, which would reduce our revenues and operating income.
Decreased demand for thermal or metallurgical coals, and extended or substantial price declines for coal could adversely affect our operating results for future periods and our ability to generate cash flows necessary to improve productivity and expand operations. The cash flows associated with our logistics business may decline unless we are able to secure new volumes of coal or other dry bulk products, by attracting additional customers to these operations. Future growth and profitability of our logistics business segment will depend, in part, upon whether we can contract for additional coal and other bulk commodity volumes at a rate greater than that of any decline in volumes from existing customers. Accordingly, decreased demand for coal, or other bulk commodities, or a decrease in the market price of coal, or other bulk commodities, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of our logistics business.
The geographic location of the Convent Marine Terminal could expose us to potential significant liabilities, including operational hazards and unforeseen business interruptions, that could substantially and adversely affect our future financial performance.
CMT is located in the Gulf Coast region, and its operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions, including interruptions from hurricanes or floods, which have historically impacted the region with some regularity. If any of these events were to occur, we could incur substantial losses because of personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, and pollution or other environmental damage resulting in curtailment or suspension of our related operations.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Your percentage ownership in us may be diluted by future issuances of capital stock or securities or instruments that are convertible into our capital stock, which could reduce your influence over matters on which stockholders vote.
Our Board of Directors has the authority, without action or vote of our stockholders, to issue all or any part of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock, including shares issuable upon the exercise of options, shares that may be issued to satisfy our obligations under our incentive plans, shares of our authorized but unissued preferred stock and securities and instruments that are convertible into our common stock. Issuances of common stock or voting preferred stock would reduce your influence over matters on which our stockholders vote and, in the case of issuances of preferred stock, likely would result in your interest in us being subject to the prior rights of holders of that preferred stock.
Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock may be limited by restrictive covenants in our debt agreements and by other factors.
Any declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be limited by restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, and will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends and other considerations that our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Further, we may not have sufficient surplus under Delaware law to be able to pay any dividends in the future. The absence of sufficient surplus may result from extraordinary cash expenses, actual expenses exceeding contemplated costs, funding of capital expenditures or increases in reserves.
Provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation, our amended and restated by-laws and the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could deter or prevent a change in control.
Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our Board of Directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include:
a Board of Directors that is divided into three classes with staggered terms;


27
Table of Contents


action by written consent of stockholders may only be taken unanimously by holders of all our shares of common stock;
rules regarding how our stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings;
the right of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval;
limitations on the right of stockholders to remove directors; and
limitations on our ability to be acquired.
The DGCL also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15 percent or more of our outstanding common stock.
We believe that these provisions protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our Board of Directors and by providing our Board of Directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make us immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our Board of Directors determines is in our best interests and that of our stockholders.
Any or all of the foregoing provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.
A person or group could establish a substantial position in SunCoke Energy, Inc. stock.
We do not have a shareholder rights plan which may make it easier for a person or group to acquire a substantial position in SunCoke Energy, Inc. stock. Such person or group may have interests adverse to the interests of our other stockholders.
Risks Related to Our Master Limited Partnership
We own a significant equity interest in the Partnership.
We own the general partner of the Partnership, which holds a 2.0 percent ownership interest and IDRs, and we currently own a 60.4 percent limited partner interest in the Partnership. The Partnership holds a 98 percent interest in each of three entities that own our Haverhill, Ohio, Middletown, Ohio, and Granite City, Illinois cokemaking facilities and related assets. The Partnership also owns terminals and related assets that provide handling and/or mixing services of coal and other aggregates in Louisiana and West Virginia. All of the Partnership’s coke sales, and certain of its logistics services, are made pursuant to long-term, take-or-pay agreements, and our financial statements include the consolidated results of the Partnership. The Partnership is subject to operating and regulatory risks which are substantially similar to our own. The occurrence of any of these risks could directly or indirectly affect the Partnership’s, as well as our, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as the Partnership is a consolidated subsidiary. For additional information about the Partnership, see “Cokemaking Operations” and “Formation of a Master Limited Partnership” in Business and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Operating Results (Items 1 and 7), respectively.
We derive a portion of our cash flows from the quarterly cash distributions we receive due to our equity ownership interest in the Partnership.  If the Partnership is unable to generate sufficient cash flow, its ability to pay quarterly distributions to unitholders (including us) at current levels, or to increase its quarterly distributions in the future, could adversely impact our cash position.
The Partnership’s ability to pay quarterly distributions depends primarily on cash flow. The Partnership’s ability to generate sufficient cash from operations is largely dependent upon its ability to successfully manage its business which may be affected by economic, financial, competitive, and regulatory factors beyond the Partnership’s control.  To the extent the Partnership does not have adequate cash reserves, its ability to pay quarterly distributions to its common unitholders (including us) at current levels, or to increase its quarterly distributions in the future, could be adversely affected.  Due to our equity ownership interest in the Partnership, we derive a portion of our cash flows from the quarterly cash distributions we receive.  If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds from the Partnership at current or increased levels, our cash position could be adversely affected.
We are party to an omnibus agreement with the Partnership that exposes us to various risks and uncertainties.
In connection with the initial public offering of the Partnership and the related contribution to the Partnership of an interest in each of our Haverhill, Ohio and Middletown, Ohio cokemaking facilities, we entered into an omnibus agreement with the Partnership. This omnibus agreement was later amended in connection with the contribution to the


28
Table of Contents


Partnership of an interest in our Granite City, Illinois cokemaking assets. Pursuant to this omnibus agreement, we have agreed to grant the Partnership preferential rights to pursue certain growth opportunities we identify in the U.S. and Canada and a right of first offer to acquire certain of our cokemaking assets located in the U.S. and Canada for so long as we control the Partnership’s general partner. Pursuant to this agreement, we have agreed to indemnify the Partnership for certain environmental remediation projects costs arising prior to the contribution of the interests in the Haverhill, Ohio, Middletown, Ohio and Granite City, Illinois cokemaking facilities. The omnibus agreement further provides that we will fully indemnify the Partnership with respect to certain tax liabilities arising prior to, or in connection with, the contribution of the interests in the Haverhill, Ohio, Middletown, Ohio and Granite City, Illinois cokemaking facilities, and that we will cure or fully indemnify the Partnership for losses resulting from certain title defects at the properties owned by the Partnership or its subsidiaries. Our obligations and the extent of our exposures that may arise under the omnibus agreement are subject to various contingencies and cannot be estimated with certainty at this time.
The value of our investment in the Partnership depends on the Partnership's status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as well as the Partnership not being subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation by individual states. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has issued final regulations which would result in the Partnership being treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes and subject to entity-level taxation beginning January 1, 2028. In addition, the IRS may challenge the Partnership’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes from the time of the Partnership's initial public offering. If the IRS were to treat the Partnership as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or the Partnership were to become subject to material additional amounts of entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, then the value of our investment in the Partnership could be substantially reduced.
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of our investment in the Partnership depends largely on the Partnership being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Despite the fact that the Partnership is organized as a limited partnership under Delaware law, the Partnership would be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes unless more than 90 percent of its income is from certain specified sources (the “Qualifying Income Exception”) under Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
On January 19, 2017, the IRS and the U.S. Department of Treasury issued qualifying income regulations (the “Final Regulations”) regarding the Qualifying Income Exception.  The Final Regulations were published in the Federal Register on January 24, 2017, and apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 19, 2017.  Under the Final Regulations, the Partnership’s cokemaking operations have been excluded from the definition of qualifying income activities, subject to a ten-year transition period.  As a result, the following consequences might ensue:
If the Partnership’s income from cokemaking operations “was qualified income under the statute as reasonably interpreted prior to May 6, 2015,” then the Partnership will have a transition period ending on December 31, 2027, during which it can treat income from its existing cokemaking activities as qualifying income. The Partnership’s transitional status during this period is likely to impair the growth prospects of the Partnership, and we do not expect that the Partnership would acquire additional cokemaking operations from third parties or from us without receipt of an IRS private letter ruling confirming the availability of the transition period as applied to the income from such an acquisition. 
The IRS might challenge treatment by the Partnership of income from its cokemaking operations as qualifying income by asserting that such treatment did not rely upon a reasonable interpretation of the statute prior to May 6, 2015. If so, nothing would preclude the IRS from challenging the Partnership’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes from the time of the Partnership’s initial public offering.  If this challenge were to occur and prevail, (i) the Partnership would be taxed retroactively as if it were a corporation at federal and state tax rates, likely resulting in a material amount of taxable income and taxes in certain open years, (ii) historical and future distributions would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions and (iii) no income, gains, losses, deductions or credits recognized by the Partnership would flow to unitholders of the Partnership. This would result in a material reduction in the Partnership’s cash flow and after-tax return to the Partnership’s unitholders and the recording of an income tax provision and a reduction in net income.
If, notwithstanding our confidence regarding the Partnership’s eligibility to use the transition period based on the Partnership’s belief and a legal opinion from outside counsel, the IRS were to challenge the Partnership’s eligibility to qualify for the transition period or the Partnership’s position that it has satisfied the Qualifying Income Exception from the time of its IPO, the Partnership would vigorously disagree with such a challenge, although we can provide no assurance of the Partnership’s likelihood of, or costs associated with, prevailing. For more information see "Item 1. Business IRS Final Regulations on Qualifying income."


29
Table of Contents


    A successful IRS contest of the federal income tax positions the Partnership takes may impact adversely the market for its common units, and the costs of any IRS contest could reduce the Partnership’s cash available for distribution to unitholders, including us. If the Partnership were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, it would pay federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 21 percent, and would likely pay state income tax at varying rates. Because tax would be imposed upon the Partnership as a corporation, its after tax earnings and therefore its ability to distribute cash to us would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of the Partnership as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the Partnership’s anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to the unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our investment in the Partnership.
The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in the Partnership’s common units could be subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative changes and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
The present federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including the Partnership, or an investment in its common units, may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial interpretation at any time. Any modification to the federal income tax laws and interpretations thereof may or may not be applied retroactively. Moreover, any such modification could make it more difficult or impossible for the Partnership to meet the exception which allows publicly traded partnerships that generate qualifying income to be treated as partnerships (rather than corporations) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, affect or cause us to change our business activities, or affect the tax consequences of an investment in its common units. For example, as previously discussed, on January 24, 2017, Final Regulations were published in the Federal Register and apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 19, 2017. The Final Regulations will likely affect the Partnership’s ability to continue to qualify as a publicly traded partnership.
Risks Related to the Simplification Transaction
The proposed Simplification Transaction is subject to conditions, including some conditions that may not be satisfied on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Simplification Transaction, or significant delays in completing the Simplification Transaction, could negatively affect each party's future business and financial results and the trading prices of our common stock and the Partnership's common units.
Completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of (i) the Merger Agreement by the Company's common stockholders, and (ii) the issuance of the Company’s common stock to be used as merger consideration which make the completion and timing of the consummation of the Simplification Transaction uncertain. Also, either the Company or the Partnership may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Simplification Transaction has not been completed by September 30, 2019, except that this termination right will not be available to any party whose failure to perform any obligation under the Merger Agreement has been the principal cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the proposed Simplification Transaction to be consummated by such date.
Completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction is not assured and is subject to several risks and uncertainties, including the risk that the required Company stockholder approval may not obtained, or even if obtained, still may not result in successful completion of the Simplification Transaction. In addition, the proposed Simplification Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, some of which are beyond the parties' control, that, if not satisfied or waived, may prevent, delay or otherwise result in the proposed Simplification Transaction not occurring.
If the proposed Simplification Transaction is not completed, or if there are significant delays in completing the proposed Simplification Transaction, the Company's and the Partnership's future business and financial results and the trading prices of our common stock and the Partnership's common units could be negatively affected, and each of the parties will be subject to several risks, including the following:
the parties may be liable for fees or expenses to one another under the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement;
there may be negative reactions from the financial markets due to the fact that current prices of our common stock and the Partnership's common units may reflect a market assumption that the proposed Simplification Transaction will be completed; and
the attention of management will have been diverted to the proposed Simplification Transaction rather than their own operations and pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to their respective businesses.
The Company and the Partnership are subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the proposed Simplification Transaction is pending, which could adversely affect each party's business and operations.


30
Table of Contents


In connection with the pendency of the proposed Simplification Transaction, it is possible that some customers and other persons with whom we or the Partnership have business relationships may delay or defer certain business decisions as a result of the Simplification Transaction, which could negatively affect our and the Partnership's respective revenues, earnings and cash flow, as well as the market price of our common stock and/or the Partnership's common units, regardless of whether the proposed Simplification Transaction is eventually completed. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company and the Partnership are each subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing the Simplification Transaction, which may adversely affect the ability to execute certain business strategies including, in some cases, the ability to enter into contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness, or incur capital expenditures. Such limitations could affect each party's businesses and operations negatively prior to the completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction.
Because the exchange ratio is fixed and because the market price of our common stock will fluctuate prior to the completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction, the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders cannot be sure of the market value of our common stock they will receive as Simplification Transaction consideration relative to the value of the Partnership's common units they exchange.
The market value of the consideration that the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders actually receive in the proposed Simplification Transaction will depend on the trading price of our common stock at the closing of the proposed Simplification Transaction. The exchange ratio that determines the number of shares of our common stock that the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will receive in the proposed Simplification Transaction is fixed at 1.40 shares of our common stock for each common unit of the Partnership. There is no mechanism contained in the Merger Agreement, or otherwise, to adjust the number of shares of our common stock that the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will receive based upon any decrease or increase in the trading price of our common stock. Stock or unit price changes may result from a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our and the Partnership's control, including:
changes in our or the Partnership's business, operations and prospects;
changes in market assessments of our or the Partnership's business, operations and prospects;
changes in market assessments of the likelihood that the proposed Simplification Transaction will be completed;
interest rates, commodity prices, general market, industry and economic conditions and other factors generally affecting the price of our common stock or the Partnership's common units; and
federal, state and local legislation, governmental regulation and legal developments in the businesses in which we and the Partnership operate.
If the price of our common stock at the closing of the proposed Simplification Transaction is less than the price of our common stock on the date that the Merger Agreement was signed, then the market value of the merger consideration will be less than contemplated at the time the Merger Agreement was signed.
The date the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will receive the merger consideration depends on the completion date of the proposed Simplification Transaction, which is uncertain.
Completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction is subject to several conditions, not all of which are controllable by us or the Partnership. Accordingly, even if the proposed Simplification Transaction is approved by our common stockholders, the date on which the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will receive the merger consideration depends upon the completion date of the proposed Simplification Transaction, which is uncertain and subject to several other closing conditions.
We and the Partnership may incur transaction-related costs in connection with the proposed Simplification Transaction.
We and the Partnership each expect to incur a number of non-recurring transaction-related costs associated with completing the proposed Simplification Transaction, combining the operations of the two companies and attempting to achieve desired synergies. Non-recurring transaction costs include, but are not limited to, fees paid to legal, financial and accounting advisors, filing fees, proxy solicitation costs and printing costs. Many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately at the present time.
We are subject to provisions under the Merger Agreement that, in specified circumstances, could require us to pay a termination fee and to be responsible for the Partnership's expenses.
If the Merger Agreement is terminated by (i) the Partnership, pursuant to a material uncured breach by us of any of our covenants, representations or warranties, (ii) by the Partnership or us due to the failure to obtain the required Companystockholder approval or (iii) by the Partnership, in the event of our failure to recommend approval of the proposed Simplification


31
Table of Contents


Transaction to our stockholders, or the withdrawal, modification, or qualification of such recommendation, in a manner adverse to the Partnership, then we will reimburse the Partnership for all direct and indirect expenses and costs incurred and pay a termination fee of $6 million.
Certain executive officers and directors of the Partnership's general partner and of the Company have interests in the proposed Simplification Transaction that are different from, or in addition to, the interests they may have as the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders or our stockholders, respectively, which could have influenced their decision to support or approve the proposed Simplification Transaction.
Certain executive officers and/or directors of the partnership's general partner own equity interests in us, receive fees and other compensation from us and will have rights to ongoing indemnification and insurance coverage by the surviving company that give them interests in the proposed Simplification Transaction that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of an unaffiliated unitholder of the Partnership. Additionally, certain of our executive officers and directors beneficially own Partnership common units and will receive the applicable merger consideration upon completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction, receive fees and other compensation from us and are entitled to indemnification arrangements with us that give them interests in the proposed Simplification Transaction that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of our unaffiliated stockholders.
Financial projections by us and the Partnership may not prove to be reflective of actual future results.
In connection with the proposed Simplification Transaction, we and the Partnership have prepared and considered, among other things, internal financial forecasts for the Company and the Partnership, respectively. These forecasts speak only as of the date made and will not be updated. These financial projections were not provided with a view to public disclosure, are subject to significant economic, competitive, industry and other uncertainties and may not be achieved in full, at all or within projected time frames. In addition, the failure of our businesses to achieve projected results could have a material adverse effect on our share price, financial position and ability to institute or maintain a dividend on our stock following the proposed Simplification Transaction.
We and the Partnership may be unable to obtain the regulatory clearances required to complete the proposed Simplification Transaction or, in order to do so, we and the Partnership may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.
We are or may become subject to privacy and data protection laws, rules and directives relating to the processing of personal data in the countries where we operate.
The growth of cyber-attacks has resulted in an evolving legal landscape which imposes costs that are likely to increase over time. For example, new laws and regulations governing data privacy and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and recent California legislation (which, among other things, provides for a private right of action), pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and could potentially elevate our costs over time. Any failure by us to comply with material restrictions or satisfy material conditions.
The closing of the proposed Simplification Transactionsuch laws and regulations could result in penalties and liabilities. It is subject to the condition precedent that there is no law, injunction, judgment or ruling by a governmental authority in effect enjoining, restraining, preventing or prohibiting the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or making the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement illegal. Additionally, one or more state attorneys general could seek to block or challenge the proposed Simplification Transaction as they deem necessary or desirable in the public interest at any time, including after completion of the transaction. In addition,also possible under certain circumstances,legislation that if we acquire a third party could initiate a private action challengingcompany that has violated or seeking to enjoin the proposed Simplification Transaction, before or after it is completed. Wenot in compliance with applicable data protection laws, we may not prevail and could incur significant costs in defending or settling any such action.
Shares of our common stock to be received by the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholdersliabilities and penalties as a result of the proposed Simplification Transaction have different rights from the Partnership's common units.result.
Following completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction, the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders no longer will hold the Partnership's unaffiliated common units, but instead will be stockholders of the Company. There are important differences between the rights of the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders and the rights of our stockholders. Ownership interests in a limited partnership are fundamentally different from ownership interests in a corporation. The Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will own our common stock following the completion of the proposed Simplification Transaction, and their rights associated with the common stock will be governed by our organizational documents and the Delaware General Corporation Law, which differ in a number of respects from the Partnership's partnership agreement and the Limited Partnership Act of the State of Delaware.
Litigation filed against us and/or the Partnership could prevent or delay the consummation of the Simplification Transaction or result in the payment of damages following completion of the Simplification Transaction.
Following announcement of the proposed Simplification Transaction, purported Partnership unitholders may file putative unitholder class action lawsuits against the Partnership, its general partner, and the general partner's Board of Directors, among others. Among other remedies, the plaintiffs may seek to enjoin the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The outcome of any such litigation is uncertain. If a dismissal is not granted or a settlement is not reached, such lawsuits


32
Table of Contents


could prevent or delay completion of the Simplification Transaction and result in substantial costs to the Partnership and/or us, including costs associated with indemnification. Additional lawsuits may be filed against the Partnership, us or our respective officers or directors in connection with the Simplification Transaction. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or claim that remains unresolved at the time the Simplification Transaction is consummated may adversely affect the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the combined organization.
Risks Related to Our Legacy Coal Mining Business
Our former coal mining operations were subject to governmental regulations pertaining to employee health and safety and mandated benefits for retired coal miners. Following the divestiture of our coal mining operations, compliance with such regulations has continued to impose significant costs on our business.
Our former coal mining operations were subject to strict regulation by federal, state and local authorities with respect to environmental matters such as reclamation, and to matters such as employee health and safety and mandated benefits for retired coal miners. Even after divestiture of our coal mining business, compliance with these reclamation and benefits requirements has continued to impose significant costs on us. As a former coal mine operator, federal law requires us to secure payment of federal black lung benefits to claimants who were employees, and to contribute to a trust fund for payment of benefits and medical expenses to claimants who last worked in the coal industry before January 1, 1970. At December 31, 2018, our liabilities for coal workers’ black lung benefits totaled approximately $49.4 million. Our business could be materially and adversely harmed if these liabilities, including the number and award size of claims, were increased. See “Item 1. Business-Legal and Regulatory Requirements-Other Regulatory Requirements.”

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.
Item 2.Properties
Properties
We own the following real property:
•Approximately 661,700 acres in Vansant (Buchanan County), Virginia and McDowell County, West Virginia, on which the Jewell cokemaking facility is located, along with an additional approximately 1,675 acres including the offices, warehouse and support buildings for our Jewell coke affiliates located in Buchanan County, Virginia, as well as other general property holdings and unoccupied land in Buchanan County, Virginia and McDowell County, West Virginia.land.
•Approximately 400 acres in Franklin Furnace (Scioto County), Ohio, at and around the area where the Haverhill cokemaking facility (both the first and second phases) is located.
•Approximately 4145 acres in Granite City (Madison County), Illinois, adjacent to the U.S. Steel Granite City Works facility, on which the Granite City cokemaking facility is located. Upon the earlier of ceasing production at the facility or the end of 2044, U.S. Steel has the right to repurchase the property, including the facility, at the fair market value of the land. Alternatively, U.S. Steel may require us to demolish and remove the facility and remediate the site to original condition upon exercise of its option to repurchase the land.
•Approximately 250 acres in Middletown (Butler County), Ohio near AK Steel’sCliff’s Middletown Works facility, on which the Middletown cokemaking facility is located.
•Approximately 180 acres in Ceredo (Wayne County), West Virginia on which KRT has two terminals for its mixing and/or handling services along the Ohio and Big Sandy Rivers.
•Approximately 174175 acres in Convent (St. James Parish), Louisiana, on which CMT is located.

28
Table of Contents

We lease the following real property:
•Approximately 8890 acres of land located in East Chicago (Lake County), Indiana, on which the Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility is located and the coal handling and/or mixing facilities (Lake Terminal) that service the Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility. The leased property is inside ArcelorMittal’s Indiana Harbor Works facility and is part of an enterprise zone. As lessee of the property, we are responsible for restoring the leased property to a safe and orderly condition.
•Approximately 22295 acres of land located in Buchanan County, Virginia, on whichat and around the area where our DRT coal handling terminal is located.


33
Table of Contents


•Approximately 2530 acres in Belle (Kanawha County), West Virginia, on which KRT has a terminal for its mixing and/or handling services along the Kanawha River.
•Our corporate headquarters is located in leased office space in Lisle, Illinois under an 11-yeara 9 year lease that commenced in 2011.2021.
While the Company completed the disposal of its coal mining business in April 2016, we continue to have rights to small parcels of land, mineral rights and coal mining rights for approximately 405 thousand acres of land in Buchanan and Russell Counties, Virginia. These agreements convey mining rights to us in exchange for payment of certain immaterial royalties and/or fixed fees.
Item 3.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Legal Proceedings
The information presented in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Many legal and administrative proceedings are pending or may be brought against us arising out of our current and past operations, including matters related to commercial and tax disputes, product liability, employment claims, personal injury claims, premises-liability claims, allegations of exposures to toxic substances and general environmental claims. Although the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be ascertained at this time, it is reasonably possible that some of them could be resolved unfavorably to us. Our management believes that any liabilities that may arise from such matters would not be material in relation to our business or our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at December 31, 2018.2021.
Item 4.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Mine Safety Disclosures
While the Company divested substantially all of its remaining coal mining assets in April 2016, the Company remains responsible for reclamation of certain retainedlegacy coal mining assets remainlocations that are subject to Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA") regulatory purview and the Company continues to own certain logistics assets that are also regulated by MSHA. The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters that we are required to report in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.014) is included in Exhibit 95.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




29
34
Table of Contents



PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Shares of our common stock trade under the stock trading symbol “SXC” on the NYSE. The graph below matches the Company's cumulative 5-Year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the S&P Small Cap 600 index and the Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 20132016 to December 31, 2018.2021.
In selecting the indices for comparison, we considered market capitalization and industry or line-of-business. The S&P Small Cap 600 is a broad equity market index comprised of companies of between $450 million and $2.1 billion. The Company is a part of this index. The Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel index is comprised of both U.S.-based steel and metals manufacturing and coal and iron ore mining companies. While we do not manufacture steel, we do produce coke, an essential ingredient in the blast furnace production of steel. In addition, we have logistics operations. Accordingly, we believe the Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel index is appropriate for comparison purposes.


sxc2018performancegraph1.jpg


sxc-20211231_g1.jpg

30
35
Table of Contents



Holders
As of February 8, 2019,18, 2022, we had a total of 72,233,75098,516,420 issued shares and 64,756,09383,111,938 outstanding shares of our common stock and had 10,7308,693 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
Our Board of Directors declared the following dividends during 2021 and through February 24, 2022:
Date DeclaredRecord DateDividend Per SharePayment Date
February 4, 2021February 19, 2021$0.0600March 1, 2021
April 28, 2021May 19, 2021$0.0600June 1, 2021
July 26, 2021August 18, 2021$0.0600September 1, 2021
November 1, 2021November 18, 2021$0.0600December 1, 2021
February 1, 2022February 17, 2022$0.0600March 1, 2022
Our payment of dividends in the future, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors and will depend on business conditions, our financial condition, earnings, liquidity and capital requirements, covenants in our debt agreements and other factors. Any dividend program may be canceled, suspended, terminated or modified at any time at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Company's Share Repurchase Program
On July 23, 2014,October 28, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value, at any time and from time to time in the open market throughtransactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, block transactions, or otherwise for a total aggregate cost to the Company not to exceed $150.0 million. There were no shares repurchased during 2018. At December 31, 2018 there was $39.4 million available under the authorized share repurchase program.
Partnership Common Unit Purchase Program
In 2017, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program for the Company to purchase outstanding Partnership common units at any time and from time to timeby other means in the open market, through privately negotiated transactions, block transactions, or otherwiseaccordance with federal securities laws, for a total aggregate cost to the Company not to exceed $100.0 million. DuringThere have been no share repurchases since the first quarter of 2018,2020 as the Company purchased 231,171 of outstanding Partnership common units in the open market for total cash payments of $4.2 million, which increased our limited partner interest in the Partnership from 59.9 percent to 60.4 percent at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018 there was $47.1temporarily suspended additional repurchases, leaving $96.3 million available under the authorized Partnership purchase program.
Partnership's Unit Repurchase Program
On July 20, 2015, the Partnership's Boardrepurchase program as of Directors authorized a program for the Partnership to repurchase up to $50.0 million of its common units. There were no unit repurchases during 2018 by the Partnership. At December 31, 2018, there was $37.2 million available under the authorized unit repurchase program.2021.


Item 6.[Reserved]


31
36
Table of Contents

Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The following table presents summary consolidated operating results and other information of SunCoke Energy and should be read in conjunction with "Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Operations
 Years Ended December 31,
 
2018(1)
 
2017(1)
 
2016(1)
 
2015(1)
 2014
 (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Operating Results:         
Total revenues$1,450.9
 $1,331.5
 $1,223.3
 $1,362.7
 $1,503.8
Operating income (loss)(2)
$118.7
 $104.2
 $97.9
 $76.6
 $(67.8)
Net income (loss)(3)(4)
$47.0
 $103.5
 $59.5
 $10.3
 $(101.8)
Net income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$26.2
 $122.4
 $14.4
 $(22.0) $(126.1)
Earnings (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc. per common share:         
Basic$0.40
 $1.90
 $0.22
 $(0.34) $(1.83)
Diluted$0.40
 $1.88
 $0.22
 $(0.34) $(1.83)
Dividends paid per share$—
 $—
 $—
 $0.4335
 $0.0585
Other Information:         
Total assets$2,045.3
 $2,060.1
 $2,120.9
 $2,255.5
 $1,959.7
Long-term debt and financing obligation$834.5
 $861.1
 $849.2
 $997.7
 $633.5
(1)The results of CMT have been included in the consolidated financial statements since it was acquired on August 12, 2015. CMT added the following:
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Combined assets$370.9
 $394.6
 $411.7
 $426.1
Revenue$81.3
 $71.1
 $62.7
 $28.6
Operating income$40.2
 $42.3
 $46.5
 $18.4
(2)In April 2016, the Company recorded losses related to the divestiture of its coal mining business to Revelation Energy, LLC of $14.7 million. During 2014, we recorded total impairment charges related to our coal mining business of $150.3 million, which included both long-lived asset and goodwill impairment charges.
(3)On June 27, 2018, the Company sold its investment in VISA SunCoke Limited ("VISA SunCoke"), resulting in a net $5.4 million loss from equity method investment. During 2015 and 2014, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges on our investment in VISA SunCoke of $19.4 million and $30.5 million, respectively. The 2015 impairment charges brought our investment in VISA SunCoke to zero.
(4)During 2017, the Company recorded $154.7 million of net tax benefits, $125.0 million of which were attributable to SunCoke, related to the new Tax Legislation. Additionally, during 2017, the Company recorded deferred income tax expense of $64.2 million, all of which was attributable to noncontrolling interest, related to the Final Regulations. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.


37
Table of Contents


Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements of expected future developments, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business, operations and industry that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our future results and financial condition may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of the factors we describe under “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.”
Among other things, such risks and uncertainties include the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on SunCoke’s results of operations, revenues, earnings and cash flows; SunCoke’s balance sheet and liquidity throughout and following the COVID-19 pandemic; SunCoke’s prospects for financial performance and achievement of strategic objectives following the COVID-19 pandemic; and the general impact on our industry and on the U.S. and global economy resulting from COVID-19 and actions by domestic and foreign governments and others in response thereto.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is based on financial data derived from the financial statements prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and certain other financial data that is prepared using a non-GAAP measures.measure. For a reconciliation of thesethe non-GAAP measuresmeasure to the most comparable GAAP components,component, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this Item and Note 1920 to our consolidated financial statements.
Our MD&A is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Our results of operations include reference to our business operations and market conditions, which are further described in Part I of this document.
20182021 Overview
Our consolidated results of operations in 20182021 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Dollars in millions)
Net income$48.8 
Net cash provided by operating activities$233.1 
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$275.4 
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 (Dollars in millions)
Net income$47.0
Net cash provided by operating activities$185.8
Adjusted EBITDA$263.2
(1)See Note 20 in our consolidated financial statements for both the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and the reconciliation from GAAP to the non-GAAP measurement.

The Company successfully delivered against our key objectives in 2018, including:
Achieved financial objectives. We delivered net income2021. Our entry into and participation in the export and foundry coke markets, in addition to successful execution on our contracted coke sales, enabled our Domestic Coke facilities to operate at full capacity. This strong Domestic Coke performance along with higher volumes, price realization, and the addition of $47.0 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $263.2 million,a new product, iron ore, in our highest annualLogistics segment drove record Adjusted EBITDA performance since 2012 and abovein 2021. Our long-term, take-or-pay coke contracts continue to provide stability to our guidance range of $240 million to $255 million. Wecoke operations, which now also generated $185.8 million of operating cash flow, above our guidance of $150 million to $165 million. Domestic Coke contributed Adjusted EBITDA per toninclude a new five year take-or-pay contract with Algoma Steel beginning in 2022, with average sales of approximately $51.55, at the high-end of our guidance range of $50 to $52 per ton, on 4.0 million tons sold. Logistics delivered Adjusted EBITDA of $72.6 million, within our guidance range of $71 million to $76 million, reflecting the highest annual volumes in CMT’s history.
Completed 67 oven rebuilds at Indiana Harbor. We successfully achieved our goal of rebuilding 67 ovens in 2018. In total, we have rebuilt 211 of 268 ovens, which represents approximately 80 percent of the entire facility. Indiana Harbor's 2018 Adjusted EBITDA was $15.2 million on 957150 thousand tons of blast furnace coke sales. Improved operating performance from rebuilt ovensper year.
We returned meaningful capital to our shareholders through the declaration and higher operatingpayment of a $0.06 per share dividend during each quarter of 2021. Additionally, we executed a debt refinancing, discussed in further detail below, which allowed us to achieve annual interest rate savings of approximately $17 million and maintenance cost recovery drove a $33.7 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA in 2018 compared to 2017.
Achieved de-leveraging goals. We achievedextend our objective to pay down $25 million on the Partnership Revolver in 2018. We continue to maintain our focus on strengthening our balance sheet and continuing to reduce debt in 2019.
Leveraged CMT capabilities to further diversify customer and product mix. We continued to further diversify the product mix by handling petroleum coke, aggregates and liquids, and we remain focused on adding additional dry bulk products to grow the terminal.  In 2018, we moved approximately one million merchant tons of bulk products through CMT.
Delivered operational excellence and optimized our asset base. We continued to improve operational performance across both our coke and logistics businesses, which was reflected by the increase in volumes in both segments during 2018. We encountered operational challenges at our Granite City facility during 2018, which included an extended outage and a machinery fire. As part of the extended outage, we completed various upgrades on our heat recovery steam generators and flue gas desulfurization system in order to improve the long-term reliability and


38
Table of Contents


operational performance of these assets. These necessary upgrades will better position Granite City for long-term success.maturities significantly. We also made significant progress on our environmental remediation project at Granite City and expect the project to be completedreduced total debt by the middle of 2019.
Our Focus and Outlook for 2019
During 2019, our primary focus will be to:
Achieve financial objectives. We expect to deliver Adjusted EBITDA of between $265 million and $275 million and operating cash flow of between $180 million and $195 million. Significant operational improvements at Granite City, improved performance from rebuilt ovens at Indiana Harbor and solid ongoing operations across the remaining Domestic Coke fleet are expected to contribute to the growth in Adjusted EBITDA.
Complete last phase of oven rebuilds at Indiana Harbor. We expect our Indiana Harbor cokemaking operation to deliver approximately $22$64 million in Adjusted EBITDA on approximately 1,025 thousand tons of coke sales. The 2019 oven rebuilds are expected to cost between $50 million to $60 million, including capital expenditures between $40 million to $48 million, and will be completed by the end of 2019. Once the final phase of the oven rebuild campaign is complete, we anticipate Indiana Harbor will produce at near nameplate coke capacity and generate run-rate Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $50 million.
2021.
Complete the Simplification Transaction. On February 5, 2019, the Company and the Partnership announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement whereby SunCoke will acquire all outstanding common units of the Partnership not already owned by SunCoke in a stock-for-unit merger transaction (the “Simplification Transaction”).

We believe the Simplification Transaction will provide numerous benefits, including:
◦
Simplification of the organizational and governance structure, reducing complexity for investors
◦
Creation of a larger publicly-traded company, increasing public float and enhancing trading liquidity
◦
Immediately accretive to SunCoke shareholders
◦SunCoke intends to initiate a $0.24 annual dividend per share, in the first full quarter after closing the transaction
◦
Improved credit profile and enhanced access to capital markets lowers cost of capital
◦
Consolidation of cash flow and elimination of master limited partnership distribution accelerates objective of reducing leverage
◦
Estimated cost synergies of approximately $2 million per year from eliminating dual public company requirements and estimated cash tax savings of $40 million over the next five years
◦
More cash flow available to deploy for organic growth projects, attractive merger and acquisition opportunities and/or to return capital to shareholders
◦
Elimination of master limited partnership qualifying income limitations on growth
Pursue growth opportunities. Simplifying SunCoke’s structure will enable us to pursue an expanded universe of growth opportunities and enable us to be more competitive as we look to execute on our growth strategy. Our strategy focuses on four business initiatives, which include growing our coke market share in the North America, expanding and optimizing our logistics assets, developing additional business lines within the domestic steel and carbon markets and leveraging our technology to expand in select global markets. These are all areas that closely align with our core competencies, where our knowledge and technical expertise can create additional value for our shareholders.
Deliver operational excellence and optimize our asset base. We remain focused on further improving operational performance across both our coke and logistics businesses, as well as successfully executing on our 2019 capital plan. We expect operational improvements at Granite City to generate an increase in production and higher energy revenues as well as lower operating and maintenance costs. We also continue to work to secure further new business and diversify our customer base.


39
Table of Contents


Items Impacting Comparability
India Equity Method Investment. On June 27, 2018,•2021 Debt Refinancing. During the second quarter of 2021, the Company soldrefinanced its 49 percent investment in VISA SunCoke Limited ("VISA SunCoke") for cash consideration of $4.0 million. Consequently, thedebt obligations. The Company recognized $9.0issued $500.0 million of accumulated currency translation losses4.875 percent 2029 Senior Notes, amended and incurred $0.4 million of transaction costs, resulting in a net $5.4 million loss from equity method investment in 2018 onextended the Consolidated Statements of Income. Our investment in VISA SunCoke was previously accounted for as an equity method investment and was fully impaired in 2015.
Debt Activities. On January 11, 2018, the Company redeemed allmaturity of its outstanding 2019 Notes for $46.1Revolving Facility to June 2026 and reduced the Revolving Facility capacity by $50.0 million to $350.0 million. The Company fundedused the redemptionproceeds of the 2029 Senior Notes along with borrowings under the Company's Revolving Facility to purchase and redeem all of the 7.500 percent 2025 Senior Notes. As a Term Loan in aggregate principal amountresult of $45.0 million, which will mature on May 24, 2022.the debt
32
Table of Contents
During 2017,refinancing and revolver amendment, the Partnership refinanced its debt obligations, which resulted inyear ended December 31, 2021 included a loss on extinguishment of debt on the Consolidated StatementsStatement of IncomeOperations of $20.4 million. During 2016, the Partnership de-levered its balance sheet by repurchasing $89.5$31.9 million, face valuewhich consisted of the Partnership's notes, resulting in a gain on debt extinguishmentpremium paid of $25.0 million on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Weighted average debt balances during 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $883.8 million, $885.4$22.0 million and $920.2 million, respectively, and related interest expense, net was $65.8 million, $62.4the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $6.9 million and $58.8 million, respectively, or a weighted average interest ratethe remaining original issue discount of 7.45 percent, 7.05 percent and 6.39 percent, respectively. The increase in related interest expense in 2017 as compared$3.0 million. See Note 12 to 2016 was driven by higher interest ratesour consolidated financial statements for further discussion of asthe debt refinancing.
•2020 Customer Contract Amendments. As a result of the Partnership's debt refinancing activitiesmarket challenges presented by the COVID-19 global pandemic, during 2020 SunCoke executed contract amendments with its steelmaking customers to provide near-term coke supply relief in 2017. Interest expenseexchange for extending certain contracts. These customer contract amendments reduced customer contract volumes in 2018 reflects a full year2020 by approximately 500 thousand tons of the higher rates.coke, which reduced 2020 Adjusted EBITDA by approximately $20 million, net of cost savings.
Tax Rulings.
◦
Tax Legislation. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Legislation”) was enacted. The Tax Legislation significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure, including lowering corporate income tax rates. As a result, in 2017, SunCoke recorded net income tax benefits of $154.7 million, of which $125.0 million was attributable to the Company, resulting from the remeasurement of U.S. deferred income tax liabilities and assets at the lower enacted corporate tax rates. During 2018, based on an updated analysis of the foreign tax credit rules relating to the new Tax Legislation, the Company revised its estimate of the realizability of its foreign tax credits, resulting in a $4.8 million benefit on the consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.
◦
IRS Final Regulations on Qualifying Income. In January 2017, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") announced its decision to exclude cokemaking as a qualifying income generating activity in its final regulations (the "Final Regulations") issued under section 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code relating to the qualifying income exception for publicly traded partnerships. Subsequent to the 10-year transition period, certain cokemaking entities in the Partnership will become taxable as corporations. As a result, the Partnership recorded deferred income tax expense of $148.6 million to set up its initial deferred income tax liability during 2017, primarily related to differences in the book and tax basis of fixed assets, which are expected to exist at the end of the 10-year transition period when the cokemaking operations become taxable. However, the Company had previously recorded $84.4 million of the deferred income tax liability in its financial statements related to the Company's share of the deferred tax liability for the book and tax differences in its investment in the Partnership. As such, the Company's 2017 financial statements reflected the $64.2 million incremental impact from the Final Regulations solely attributable to the Partnership’s public unitholders, which was also recorded as an equal reduction to noncontrolling interest. As a result, the Final Regulations had no impact to net income attributable to the Company.


40
Table of Contents




Redemption of Investment in Brazilian Cokemaking Operations. In November 2016, ArcelorMittal Brazil redeemed SunCoke’s indirectly held preferred and common equity interest in Sol Coqueria Tubarão S.A. ("Brazil Investment") for consideration of $41.0 million, an amount equal to our carrying value of the investment. The Company received $20.5 million in cash at closing in 2016 and received the remaining $20.5 million in cash, plus interest of $0.2 million, in 2017.
Loss on Divestiture of Business. In April 2016, the Company completed the disposal of its coal mining business to Revelation Energy, LLC ("Revelation"). Revelation assumed substantially all of the Company's remaining coal mining assets, mineral leases, real estate and a substantial portion of our mining reclamation obligations. Under the terms of the agreement, Revelation received $12.8 million from the Company to take ownership of the assets and liabilities. During 2016, the Company recognized losses associated with this divestiture of $14.7 million.



41
Table of Contents


Consolidated Results of Operations
The following section includes year-over-year analysis of consolidated results of operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. See "Analysis of Segment Results" later in this section for further details of these results.
Refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-over-year analysis of consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019.
Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)Years Ended December 31,
2018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 201620212020Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)
Revenues         Revenues
Sales and other operating revenue$1,450.9
 $1,331.5
 $1,223.3
 $119.4
 $108.2
Sales and other operating revenue$1,456.0 $1,333.0 $123.0 
Costs and operating expenses         Costs and operating expenses
Cost of products sold and operating expenses1,124.5
 1,020.1
 905.9
 104.4
 114.2
Cost of products sold and operating expenses1,118.8 1,048.2 70.6 
Selling, general and administrative expenses66.1
 79.0
 90.6
 (12.9) (11.6)Selling, general and administrative expenses61.8 81.4 (19.6)
Depreciation and amortization expense141.6
 128.2
 114.2
 13.4
 14.0
Depreciation and amortization expense133.9 133.7 0.2 
Loss on divestiture of business(1)
—
 —
 14.7
 —
 (14.7)
Total costs and operating expenses1,332.2
 1,227.3
 1,125.4
 104.9
 101.9
Total costs and operating expenses1,314.5 1,263.3 51.2 
Operating income118.7
 104.2
 97.9
 14.5
 6.3
Operating income141.5 69.7 71.8 
Interest expense, net(1)
61.4
 61.9
 54.8
 (0.5) 7.1
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net(1)
0.3
 20.4
 (25.0) (20.1) 45.4
Income before income tax expense (benefit) and loss from equity method investment57.0
 21.9
 68.1
 35.1
 (46.2)
Income tax expense (benefit)4.6
 (81.6) 8.6
 86.2
 (90.2)
Loss from equity method investment(1)
5.4
 —
 —
 5.4
 —
Interest expense, netInterest expense, net42.5 56.3 (13.8)
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, netLoss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net31.9 (5.7)37.6 
Income before income tax expenseIncome before income tax expense67.1 19.1 48.0 
Income tax expenseIncome tax expense18.3 10.3 8.0 
Net income47.0
 103.5
 59.5
 (56.5) 44.0
Net income48.8 8.8 40.0 
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests20.8
 (18.9) 45.1
 39.7
 (64.0)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interestsLess: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests5.4 5.1 0.3 
Net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$26.2
 $122.4
 $14.4
 $(96.2) $108.0
Net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$43.4 $3.7 $39.7 
(1)See year-over-year changes described in "Items Impacting Comparability."
Sales and Other Operating Revenue and Costs of Products Sold and Operating Expenses.Sales and other operating revenue and costs of products sold and operating expenses increased for 2018 and 2017in 2021 as compared to prior year periods,2020 primarily due to the pass-through of higher coal prices in our Domestic Coke segment. Additionally, there were higher sales volumes in our Domestic Coke segment, in 2018.partially offset by the pass-through of lower coal prices. Higher sales volumes and favorable pricing in our Logistics segment also increased sales and other operating revenues in both 2018 and 2017.2021 as compared to 2020.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expense primarily reflects lower legacy costs, which decreased $11.3 million in 2018 as2021 compared to 2017 was2020 as a result of valuation adjustments in both years primarily driven by lower employee-relatedchanges in the discount rates on certain legacy liabilities. Additionally, 2021 benefited from the absence of research and development costs lower black lungrelated to foundry coke production of $3.9 million, the absence of $2.5 million of restructuring costs, and the absence of the write-off of costs associated with the termination of our project for a potential new cokemaking facility, which together decreased selling, general and administrative expense by $10.9 million. The decrease in 2017 as compared to 2016 was due to lower employee-related costs, lower costs to resolve certain legal matters and lower professional service fees, which together decreased selling, general and administrative expenseincurred during the prior year. These benefits were partially offset by $12.4 million.higher employee related costs.

33
Table of Contents
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. The increase in depreciationDepreciation and amortization expense during 2018 was impacted by depreciationreasonably consistent with the prior year.
Interest Expense, net. Interest expense, on the completed oven rebuilds at Indiana Harbor. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during 2017 was impacted by incremental depreciation expense on CMT's ship loader and certain environmental remediation (i.e. gas sharing) assets at our Haverhill cokemaking facility, both placed in service during the fourth quarter of 2016. 
In 2018, we revised the estimate useful lives of certain heat recovery steam generatorsnet benefited from lower interest rates as a result of plans to replace major components with upgraded materialsthe debt refinancing that occurred during the second quarter of 2021 and design. Additionally, nearlower average debt balances on the end of 2016, we revised the estimated useful lives of our Indiana Harbor ovens. These changes in estimates resulted in additional depreciation of $26.7 million, $22.4 million and $13.7 million, or $0.41, $0.35 and $0.17 per common share from operations, during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.revolving facility.
Income Taxes.Income tax expense, was $4.6 million and $8.6 millionnet during 2021 reflects the impacts of certain changes in 2018 and 2016, respectively, while 2017 had an incomestate tax laws, resulting in a state tax benefit of $81.6$1.3 million. The periods presented are not comparable as 2017 includedDuring 2020, income tax expense, net impactsreflects the revaluation of certain deferred tax assets due to the Company’slower apportioned state tax rates, which resulted in deferred income tax expense of $64.2$6.5 million, associated withpartly offset by a $1.5 million benefit as result of the Final Regulations as well as the $154.7 millionCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Excluding these discrete items, SunCoke's effective tax


42
Table of Contents


benefit related to the Tax Legislation. The Company also recorded tax benefits of $1.4 million and $4.8 million in 2018 related to the Final Regulations and Tax Legislation, respectively. rate has remained reasonably consistent. See "Items Impacting Comparability" and Note 5 to theour consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling Interest.Income Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest represents the common public unitholders' interest in SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. as well as a 14.8 percent third-party interest in our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility. The following table provides details into net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest.
  Years Ended December 31
  2018 2017 2016
Net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership's common public unitholders(1)
 $21.6
 $(13.5) $46.1
Net loss attributable to third-party interest in our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility(2)
 (0.8) (5.4) (1.0)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest $20.8
 $(18.9) $45.1
(1)The loss in 2017 was primarily due to the net impacts of the Final Regulations and the new Legislation, previously discussed in "Items Impacting Comparability." Comparability between periods was also impacted by the gains and losses associated with the Partnership debt activities in 2017 and 2016, 38 percent of which is attributable to the public unitholders.
(2) The increase during 2018 as compared to 2017 is primarily due to increased volumes on improved performance from the rebuilt ovens at Indiana Harborfacility and a favorable change in the contractual recovery of operating costs at the facility as discussed in "Analysis of Segment Results." The decrease during 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily driven by lower volumes and higher operating and maintenance spending as a result of ovens out of service associatedfluctuates with the Indiana Harbor oven rebuild initiative.financial performance of that facility.
Results of Reportable Business Segments
We report our business results through three segments:
•Domestic Coke consists of our Jewell facility, located in Vansant, Virginia, our Indiana Harbor facility, located in East Chicago, Indiana, our Haverhill facility, located in Franklin Furnace, Ohio, our Granite City facility located in Granite City, Illinois, and our Middletown facility located in Middletown, Ohio.
•Brazil Coke consists of operations in Vitória, Brazil, where we operate the ArcelorMittal Brazil cokemaking facility.
•Logistics consists of Convent Marine Terminal ("CMT"), located in Convent, Louisiana, Kanawha River Terminal ("KRT"), located in Ceredo and Belle, West Virginia, SunCoke Lake Terminal ("Lake Terminal"), located in East Chicago, Indiana, and Dismal River Terminal ("DRT"), located in Vansant, Virginia. Lake Terminal and DRT are located adjacent to our Indiana Harbor and Jewell cokemaking facilities, respectively.
The operations of each of our segments are described in Part I of this document.
Corporate expenses that can be identified with a segment have been included in determining segment results. The remainder is included in Corporate and Other, including activity from our legacy coal mining business.
Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure of operating performance and liquidity and uses it as the primary basis for the chief operating decision maker to evaluate the performance of each of our reportable segments. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for the reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. See Note 1920 to our consolidated financial statements.

34

43
Table of Contents


Segment Operating Data
The following table sets forth financial and operating data by segment for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016:2020:
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions, except per ton amounts)
Sales and other operating revenue:
Domestic Coke$1,354.5 $1,265.4 $89.1 
Brazil Coke36.6 31.6 5.0 
Logistics64.9 36.0 28.9 
Logistics intersegment sales27.1 22.1 5.0 
Elimination of intersegment sales(27.1)(22.1)(5.0)
Total sales and other operating revenue$1,456.0 $1,333.0 $123.0 
Adjusted EBITDA(1):
Domestic Coke$243.4 $217.0 $26.4 
Brazil Coke17.2 13.5 3.7 
Logistics43.5 17.3 26.2 
Corporate and Other, including legacy costs, net(2)
(28.7)(41.9)13.2 
Adjusted EBITDA$275.4 $205.9 $69.5 
Coke Operating Data:
Domestic Coke capacity utilization (%)101 91 10 
Domestic Coke production volumes (thousands of tons)4,162 3,840 322 
Domestic Coke sales volumes (thousands of tons)4,183 3,789 394 
Domestic Coke Adjusted EBITDA per ton(3)
$58.19 $57.27 $0.92 
Brazilian Coke production—operated facility (thousands of tons)1,685 1,396 289 
Logistics Operating Data:
Tons handled (thousands of tons)(4)
19,933 14,678 5,255 
(1)See Note 20 in our consolidated financial statements for both the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and the reconciliation from GAAP to the non-GAAP measurement for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
(2)Corporate and Other includes the activity from our legacy coal mining business, which incurred Adjusted EBITDA losses of $1.9 million and $13.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Additionally, Corporate and Other includes foundry related research and development costs of $3.9 million during 2020.
(3)Reflects Domestic Coke Adjusted EBITDA divided by Domestic Coke sales volumes.
(4)Reflects inbound tons handled during the period.
35
 Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
 2018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
 (Dollars in millions, except per ton amounts)
Sales and other operating revenue:         
Domestic Coke$1,308.3
 $1,195.0
 $1,097.6
 $113.3
 $97.4
Brazil Coke40.4
 43.4
 39.5
 (3.0) 3.9
Logistics102.2
 93.1
 84.7
 9.1
 8.4
Logistics intersegment sales24.5
 23.8
 23.2
 0.7
 0.6
Corporate and Other(1)
—
 —
 1.5
 —
 (1.5)
Corporate and Other intersegment sales(1)
—
 —
 22.0
 —
 (22.0)
Elimination of intersegment sales(24.5) (23.8) (45.2) (0.7) 21.4
Total sales and other operating revenue$1,450.9
 $1,331.5
 $1,223.3
 $119.4
 $108.2
Adjusted EBITDA(2):
         
Domestic Coke$207.9
 $188.9
 $193.9
 $19.0
 $(5.0)
Brazil Coke18.4
 18.2
 16.2
 0.2
 2.0
Logistics72.6
 70.8

63.9
 1.8
 6.9
Corporate and Other, including legacy costs, net(3)
(35.7) (43.2) (57.0) 7.5
 13.8
Adjusted EBITDA$263.2
 $234.7
 $217.0
 $28.5
 $17.7
Coke Operating Data:  
      
Domestic Coke capacity utilization (%)95
 91
 93
 4
 (2)
Domestic Coke production volumes (thousands of tons)4,016
 3,861
 3,954
 155
 (93)
Domestic Coke sales volumes (thousands of tons)4,033
 3,851
 3,956
 182
 (105)
Domestic Coke Adjusted EBITDA per ton(4)
$51.55
 $49.05
 $49.01
 $2.50
 $0.04
Brazilian Coke production—operated facility (thousands of tons)1,768
 1,761
 1,741
 7
 20
Logistics Operating Data:         
Tons handled (thousands of tons)(5)
26,605
 21,616
 18,569
 4,989
 3,047
CMT take-or-pay shortfall tons (thousands of tons)(6)
220
 2,918
 6,076
 (2,698) (3,158)
(1)Corporate and Other revenues are related to our legacy coal mining business.
(2)See Note 19 in our consolidated financial statements for both the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and the reconciliations from GAAP to the non-GAAP measurement for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
(3)Corporate and Other includes the activity from our legacy coal mining business, which incurred Adjusted EBITDA losses of $9.8 million, $10.5 million, and $15.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(4)Reflects Domestic Coke Adjusted EBITDA divided by Domestic Coke sales volumes.
(5)Reflects inbound tons handled during the period.
(6)Reflects tons billed under take-or-pay contracts where services were not performed.



44
Table of Contents


Analysis of Segment Results
Historically, SunCoke's analysis of our Domestic Coke segment has aligned with the pass-through nature of our long-term, take-or-pay contracts, including analysis of the prices of coal passed through and the reimbursement of operating maintenance spending as compared to prior year periods. Beginning in 2021, our Domestic Coke business has expanded into the export coke market and the foundry coke market. These sales do not contain the same pass-through provisions as our long-term, take-or-pay contracts. Therefore, the analysis of our Domestic Coke results has evolved to allow for the inclusion of these sales. The impact of fluctuating coal prices, including the value of coal-to-coke yield gains and losses, and indexed operating and maintenance reimbursement rates are now presented as price variances along with the impact of export and foundry sales prices as compared to prior period sales prices.
Domestic Coke
The following table explains year-over-year changes in our Domestic Coke segment's sales and other operating revenues and Adjusted EBITDA results:
Sales and other operating revenueAdjusted EBITDA
2021 vs 20202021 vs 2020
(Dollars in millions)
Beginning$1,265.4 $217.0 
Volume(1)
123.4 29.4 
Price(2)
(47.0)2.3 
Operating and maintenance costs(3)
N/A(15.9)
Energy and other(4)
12.7 10.6 
Ending$1,354.5 $243.4 
 Sales and other operating revenue Adjusted EBITDA
 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Beginning$1,195.0
 $1,097.6
 $188.9
 $193.9
Volumes(1)
48.3
 (23.8) 8.5
 (2.5)
Coal cost recovery and yields(2)
58.4
 118.8
 12.2
 7.1
Operating and maintenance costs(3)
14.6
 1.0
 1.5
 (15.6)
Energy and other(4)
(8.0) 1.4
 (3.2) 6.0
Ending$1,308.3
 $1,195.0
 $207.9
 $188.9
(1)Sales volumes increased over 180 thousand tons in 2018, primarily due to improved operating performance from rebuilt ovens at Indiana Harbor. In 2017, sales volumes were 105 thousand tons lower than in 2016 and were negatively impacted by ovens that were out of service in connection with the ongoing oven rebuild initiative at Indiana Harbor as well as a decrease in volumes to AK Steel, for which AK Steel provided make whole payments.
(2)Revenues and the impact of coal-to-coke yields on Adjusted EBITDA move directionally with changes in coal prices, which increased in both 2018 and 2017 as compared to the prior year periods. Additionally, revenue and Adjusted EBITDA benefited from improved operational coal-to-coke yields, primarily at our Indiana Harbor facility in 2017 and again in 2018 as the facility realized benefits from the oven rebuild initiative.
(3)In 2018, the operating cost component of the contract at our Indiana Harbor facility changed from fixed recovery per ton to an annually negotiated budget, which drove favorable operating and maintenance cost recovery of $10.8 million as compared to 2017. This 2018 improvement was offset by the timing and scope of outage work at other facilities, which negatively impacted Adjusted EBITDA by $6.6 million. Higher operating and maintenance costs in 2017 as compared to 2016 was driven by an increase in the number of oven rebuilds at Indiana Harbor.
(4)The decrease in energy in 2018 as compared to 2017 was primarily driven by our extended Granite City outage and the impact a machinery fire had on coke production and energy. The improvement in 2017 as compared to 2016 was driven by the impact of a turbine failure at our Haverhill facility in October 2016, which was fully restored in January 2017. This turbine failure adversely affected energy production in 2016, although the impact was partially mitigated by insurance recoveries.

(1)Volumes improved in 2021 due to the absence of volume relief provided to our customers in exchange for contract extensions in 2020 as well as our successful entry into and participation in the foundry and export coke markets.

(2)The pass through of lower coal prices on our long-term, take-or-pay agreements resulted in lower revenues. Under recovery of coal costs at our Jewell cokemaking facility decreased Adjusted EBITDA $11.1 million in 2021 as compared to 2020, the impact of which was more than offset by favorable margins on our foundry coke and export coke sales.
45
Table of Contents(3)Operating and maintenance costs across the fleet returned to a normalized level during 2021. Costs were minimized during 2020 in conjunction with the volume relief discussed above.



(4)Energy and other increased primarily due to favorable energy pricing and higher volumes, which increased with our return to operating our facilities at full capacity in 2021.
Logistics
The following table explains year-over-year changes in our Logistics segment's sales and other operating revenues and Adjusted EBITDA results:
Sales and other operating revenue, inclusive of intersegment salesAdjusted EBITDA
2021 vs 20202021 vs 2020
(Dollars in millions)
Beginning$58.1 $17.3 
Transloading volumes(1)
20.4 17.8 
Price/margin impact of mix in transloading services(2)
5.0 5.0 
Other(3)
8.5 3.4 
Ending$92.0 $43.5 
(1)Volumes improved as a result of the improved export coal market as well as the handling of iron ore.
(2)Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of favorable pricing at CMT driven by the strong export coal market.
36
Table of Contents
 Sales and other operating revenue, inclusive of intersegment sales Adjusted EBITDA
 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Beginning$116.9
 $107.9
 $70.8
 $63.9
Transloading volumes(1)
9.3
 3.1
 3.6
 2.4
Price/margin impact of mix in transloading services1.7
 3.0
 1.7
 3.0
Operating and maintenance costs and other(2)
(1.2) 2.9
 (3.5) 1.5
Ending$126.7
 $116.9
 $72.6
 $70.8
(3)Other increased as a result of favorable ancillary revenue, which was a result of higher volumes as well as minimal costs incurred in 2021 associated with high water levels at CMT due to abnormal weather patterns.
(1)CMT achieved record volumes in 2017, which further increased in 2018. Volumes were 12.2 million tons, 8.0 million tons and 4.3 million tons in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)In 2018, the Mississippi River experienced near-historic water levels, which negatively impacted Adjusted EBITDA during 2018 as compared to 2017.
Brazil Coke
2018 compared to 2017
Sales and other operating revenue decreased $3.0 million, or 6.9 percent, to $40.4 million in 2018 compared to $43.4 million in 2017, primarily due to unfavorable translation adjustments.
Adjusted EBITDA was consistent at $18.4 million in 2018 compared to $18.2 million in 2017.
2017 compared to 2016
Sales and other operating revenue increased $3.9$5.0 million, or 9.916 percent, to $43.4$36.6 million in 20172021 compared to $39.5$31.6 million in 2016.2020. Adjusted EBITDA increased $3.7 million, or 27 percent, to $17.2 million in 2021 compared to $13.5 million in 2020. The increase in sales and other operating revenue was primarily dueimprovements as compared to $1.8 million of favorable translation adjustmentsthe prior year reflect higher volumes as well as higher reimbursable operating and maintenance costs of $1.1 million. The remaining increase of $1.0 million was primarily due to higher volumes, including higher production bonuses received from our customer in the current year for meeting certain volume targets beyond what was produced induring the priorcurrent year.
Adjusted EBITDA increased $2.0 million, or 12.3 percent, to $18.2 million in 2017 compared to $16.2 million in 2016. The increase was primarily driven by higher volumes, including higher production bonuses as described above and favorable translation adjustments.
Corporate and Other
2018 compared to 2017
Corporate and Other Adjusted EBITDA results,expenses, which include costs related to our legacy coal mining business, improved $7.5decreased $13.2 million, or 17.432 percent, to losses of $35.7$28.7 million in 20182021 as compared to losses of $43.2$41.9 million in 2017.2020. This improvement was driven by $4.5 million of lower employee-related costs and the absence of foundry related research and development costs incurred to resolve certain corporate legal matters incurred in the prior year period. Costs related to our legacy coal mining business were generally consistent year over yearof $3.9 million and valuation adjustments as costs to resolve certain legal matters in the current year period were more than offset by a favorable adjustment to our black lung liability, driven by higher discount rates.
2017 compared to 2016
Corporate and Other Adjusted EBITDA results, improved $13.8 million, or 24.2 percent, to lossesresult of $43.2 million in 2017 as compared to losses of $57.0 million in 2016. The improvement included a $4.5 million period-over-period benefit associated with the absence of our legacy coal mining business, which was disposed of in April 2016. The 2017 period also benefited from $4.6 million of lower employee-related and other costs and the $2.2 million favorable impact of period-over-period, mark-to-market adjustments in deferred compensation driven by changes in the Company's share price and the


46
Table of Contents


Partnership's unit price. The remaining improvement was driven by lower costs incurred to resolvediscount rates on certain legal matterslegacy liabilities, which decreased legacy cost approximately $11.3 million as compared to the prior year period.     year. These cost savings were partly offset by higher employee related costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund working capital, fund investments, service our debt, maintain cash reserves and replace partially or fully depreciated assets and other capital expenditures. Our sources of liquidity include cash generated from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilityRevolving Facility and, from time to time, debt and equity offerings. We believe our current resources are sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for our current business for at least the next 12 months and thereafter for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2018, together with the Partnership,2021, we had $145.7$63.8 million of cash and cash equivalents and $254.2$228.8 million of borrowing availability under our credit facilities.Revolving Facility.
Debt RefinancingWe may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase additional amounts of our outstanding equity and/or debt securities through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material. Refer to further liquidity discussion below as well as to Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements and "Part I - Item 5 - Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities."
On January 11, 2018,During the first quarter of 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor's Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation (“DCMWC”) requested SunCoke provide additional collateral of approximately $32 million to secure certain of its black lung obligations. SunCoke exercised its right to appeal the DCMWC’s determination and provided additional information supporting the Company’s position in May 2020 and February 2021. If the Company’s appeal is unsuccessful, the Company redeemed allmay be required to provide additional collateral to receive its self-insurance reauthorization from the DCMWC, which could potentially reduce the Company’s liquidity. See further discussion in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.
Cash Flow Summary
The following table sets forth a summary of its outstanding 2019 Notesthe net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for $46.1the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
Years Ended December 31,
20212020
(Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$233.1 $157.8 
Net cash used in investing activities(99.3)(75.3)
Net cash used in financing activities(118.4)(131.2)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$15.4 $(48.7)
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $75.3 million which included accruedto $233.1 million in 2021 as compared to 2020, reflecting higher operating results in both our coke and unpaidlogistics businesses as well as lower interest payments of $1.5 million. As$11.8 million, net of capitalized interest, primarily as a result of lower interest rates in connection with the debt extinguishment,refinancing during the second quarter of 2021. Additionally, operating activities reflect certain income tax refunds received during the current year in connection with the CARES act.
37
Table of Contents
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $24.0 million to $99.3 million in 2021 as compared to 2020 driven by higher capital spending. Ongoing capital expenditures, as defined in Capital Requirements and Expenditures below, have returned to a more normalized level in 2021 as compared to 2020. Restrictions during 2020 related to the COVID-19 global pandemic resulted in a reduction of capital project work and related spending in the prior year.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $12.8 million to $118.4 million in 2021 as compared to $131.2 million in 2020. In 2021, the Company recordedrefinanced its debt, further described in Note 6 of our consolidated financial statements, with no significant impact on total debt balances. In conjunction with this refinancing, the Company paid a loss on extinguishmentpremium of $22.0 million, included in repayment of long-term debt on the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statement of Incomecash flows, as well as $12.0 million of $0.3 million, representing a write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. The Company fundedalso made net repayments on its debt of $63.5 million and made dividend payments of $20.1 million during 2021.
In 2020, the redemption with a Term Loan in aggregate principal amountCompany repurchased $62.7 million face value of $45.0outstanding 2025 Senior Notes for $55.9 million resulting in additional debt issuance costs of $0.3 million. cash payment. Additionally, the Company made net repayments of $55.0 million on the Revolving Facility, which was partially offset by $10.0 million of financing obligation proceeds. The Term Loan will mature on May 24, 2022. BorrowingsCompany paid dividends to stockholders of $19.9 million and repurchased shares for total cash payments of $7.0 million under the Term Loan will bear interest, atrepurchase program discussed in "Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities."
Dividends
In addition to the Company’s option, at either (i)$20.1 million in dividends paid to our shareholders during 2021, on February 1, 2022, SunCoke's Board of Directors declared a base rate plus an applicable margin or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is based oncash dividend of $0.06 per share of the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as definedcommon stock. This dividend will be paid on March 1, 2022, to stockholders of record of February 17, 2022. See further discussion in the credit agreement."Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities."
Covenants
As of December 31, 2018, the Company and the Partnership2021, we were in compliance with all applicable debt covenants. We do not anticipate a violation of these covenants nor do we anticipate that any of these covenants will restrict our operations or our ability to obtain additional financing. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for details on debt covenants.
We expect the Partnership's current debt structure to remain unchanged at the time of the Simplification Transaction closing. The Simplification Transaction will not trigger any change-of-control provisions.
Credit Rating
In February 2018,June 2021, S&P Global Ratings reaffirmed the Company and the Partnership'sour corporate credit rating of BB- (stable). Additionally, in May 2018,In June 2021, Moody’s Investors Service reaffirmed the Company’sour corporate familycredit rating of B1 (stable). and stable outlook.
DistributionsContractual Obligations
On January 28, 2019, the Partnership's BoardAs of Directors declared a quarterly cash distributionDecember 31, 2021 significant contractual obligations related to debt were $627.0 million of $0.4000 per unit. This distributionprincipal borrowings and $195.0 million of related interest, which will be paidrepaid through 2029. Projected interest costs on March 1, 2019 to unitholders of record on February 15, 2019.
The Partnership anticipates it will maintain the current quarterly distributionvariable rate of $0.4000 per unit for each quarter until the closing of the Simplification Transaction. Partnership common unitholders will receive a prorated distribution per unit payable in SunCoke common shares based upon a quarterly distribution of $0.4000 per unit for the period beginning with the first day of the most recent full calendar quarter with respect to which any Partnership unitholder distribution record date has not occurred (or if there is no such full calendar quarter, then beginning with the first day of the partial calendar quarter in which the closing occurs) and ending on the day prior to the close of the Simplification Transaction.
Partnership Common Unit Purchase Program
In 2017, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program for the Company to purchase outstanding Partnership common units at any time and from time to time in the openinstruments were calculated using market through privately negotiated transactions, block transactions, or otherwise for a total aggregate cost to the Company not to exceed $100.0 million. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company purchased 231,171 of outstanding Partnership common units in the open market for total cash payments of $4.2 million, which increased our limited partner interest in the Partnership from 59.9 percent to 60.4 percentrates at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018 there was $47.1 million available under the authorized Partnership purchase program.
Cash Flow Summary
The following table sets forth a summary of the net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:


47
Table of Contents


 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$185.8
 $148.5
 $219.1
Net cash used in investing activities(95.8) (55.1) (53.9)
Net cash used in financing activities(64.5) (107.7) (172.3)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$25.5
 $(14.3) $(7.1)
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $37.3 million to $185.8 million in 2018 as compared to 2017. The increase reflects improved operations as compared to the prior year period. Additionally, there was a favorable year-over-year change of approximately $8 million in primary working capital, which is comprised of accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable, primarily driven by rebuilding coal inventory to a normalized level in the prior year period. The current year period also benefited from $8.3 million of lower interest payments, net of capitalized interest, as a result of the Partnership's debt restructuring in the second quarter of 2017, which impacted the timing of interest payments and resulted in additional payments in 2017. These improvements were partly offset by payments of certain deferred compensation during 2018.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $70.6 million to $148.5 million in 2017 as compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily driven by the unfavorable year-over-year change in primary working capital, of which approximately $47 million was due to fluctuating coal prices and inventory levels. Further contributing to the decrease in operating cash flows were higher cash interest payments, net of capitalized interest, of $14.5 million during 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of the Partnership refinancing its debt obligations. Additionally, income tax payments, net were $5.8 million in the current period as compared to income tax refunds, net of $2.3 million in 2016 and compensation-related benefit payments were higher in 2017 as compared to 2016.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $40.7 million to $95.8 million in 2018 as compared to 2017. The current year period included higher capital spending of $24.7 million as compared to the prior year, primarily on the environmental remediation project at our Granite City facility as well as higher spending for ongoing capital expenditures. The change also reflects $4.0 million of cash received for the sale of an equity method investment in the current year period as well as the absence of the $20.5 million return of the Brazilian investment collected during the first quarter of 2017.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $1.2 million to $55.1 million in 2017 as compared to 2016. An increase in capital expenditures primarily due to the Indiana Harbor oven rebuild initiative and the environmental remediation project at Granite City during 2017 was partially offset by the $12.8 million payment related to the divestiture of the coal mining business in 2016.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $64.5 million in 2018 and was related to the Partnership's distribution payments to public unitholders of $31.9 million, the Partnership's repayment of $25.0 million on its revolving credit facility and the Company's acquisition of outstanding Partnership common units for $4.2 million. The January 2018 debt restructuring had a minimal net impact to financing cash flows.2021. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of debt activities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $107.7 million in 2017 and was related to the Company's acquisition of outstanding Partnership common units for a total payment of $48.7 million and the Partnership's distribution payments to public unitholders of $47.0 million. Additionally, during 2017, the Partnership refinanced its debtstatements. We also have contractual obligations for which the Partnership made repayments of debt, net of proceeds, of $13.1 million.leases, including land, office space, equipment, railcars and locomotives. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.
Net cash used in financing activities was $172.3 million in 2016 and was primarily in connection with the Partnership's de-levering activities, for which the Partnership and the Company made repayments of debt, net of proceeds from the sale-leaseback arrangement, of $121.5 million. Additionally, during 2016, the Partnership paid distributions to public unitholders of $49.4 million.


48
Table of Contents


Capital Requirements and Expenditures
Our operations are capital intensive, requiring significant investment to upgrade or enhance existing operations and to meet environmental and operational regulations. The level of future capital expenditures will depend on various factors, including market conditions and customer requirements, and may differ from current or anticipated levels. Material changes in capital expenditure levels may impact financial results, including but not limited to the amount of depreciation, interest expense and repair and maintenance expense.
Our capital requirements have consisted, and are expected to consist, primarily of:
•Ongoing capital expenditures required to maintain equipment reliability, the integrity and safety of our coke ovens and steam generators and to comply with environmental regulations. Ongoing capital expenditures are made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets in order to maintain the existing operating capacity of the assets and/or to extend their useful lives and also include new equipment that improves the efficiency, reliability or effectiveness of existing assets. Ongoing capital expenditures do not include normal repairs and maintenance expenses, which are expensed as incurred;
Environmental remediation project expenditures required to implement design changes to ensure that our existing facilities operate in accordance with existing environmental permits; and
38
Table of Contents
•Expansion capital expenditures to acquire and/or construct complementary assets to grow our business and to expand existing facilities as well as capital expenditures made to enable the renewal of a coke sales agreement and/or logistics service agreement and on which we expect to earn a reasonable return.return; and
The following table summarizes ongoing, environmental•Environmental remediation project and expansion capital expenditures:
expenditures required to implement design changes to ensure that our existing facilities operate in accordance with existing environmental permits.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Ongoing capital(1)
$69.7
 $54.7
 $39.8
Environmental remediation project(2)
29.8
 19.4
 7.8
Expansion capital:     
CMT ship loader(3)
—
 1.1
 13.5
Other capital expansion0.8
 0.4
 2.6
Total expansion capital0.8
 1.5
 16.1
Total capital expenditures$100.3
 $75.6
 $63.7
(1)Includes $33.6 million, $29.2 million and $11.9 million of capital expenditures in connection with our current oven rebuild initiative at our Indiana Harbor facility, which began in 2015, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Includes $3.2 million, $1.1 million and $2.7 million of interest capitalized in connection with the gas sharing projects for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(3)Represents capital expenditures for the ship loader expansion project funded with cash withheld in conjunction with the acquisition of CMT. Additionally, this includes capitalized interest of $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In 2019, we expect our capital expenditures to be between $110 million and $120 million, of which approximately $55 million to $60 million will be spent at the Partnership and approximately $40 million to $48 million will be spent on the Indiana Harbor oven rebuild project.
We anticipate spending approximately $150 million on our environmental remediation projects to comply with the expected terms of the consent decree at our Haverhill and Granite City cokemaking operations, of which we have spent approximately $138 million to date, including $7 million spent by the Company prior to the formation of the Partnership. The remaining capital is expected to be spent through the first half of 2019. A portion of the proceeds from the Partnership's initial public offering and subsequent dropdowns were used to fund $119 million of these environmental remediation projects. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, the Company made capital contributions to the Partnership of $20 million during 2018 for these known environmental remediation projects. The Company expects to make additional capital


49
Table of Contents


contributions to the Partnership of approximately $5 million in the first half of 2019 for the estimated future spending related to these environmental remediation projects.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations ascapital expenditures:
Years Ended December 31,
20212020
(Dollars in millions)
Ongoing capital$87.6 $59.5 
Expansion capital(1)
11.0 14.4 
Total capital expenditures(2)
$98.6 $73.9 
(1)Includes capital spending in connection with the foundry cokemaking growth project, including $0.5 million and $0.2 million of interest capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2018:
2021 and 2020, respectively.
   Payment Due Dates
 Total 2019 2020-2021 2022-2023 Thereafter
 (Dollars in millions)
Total borrowings:(1)
         
Principal$859.0
 $3.9
 $14.1
 $141.0
 $700.0
Interest365.0
 60.5
 120.1
 107.8
 76.6
Operating leases(2)
5.4
 2.0
 2.1
 0.6
 0.7
Purchase obligations:

        
Coal(3)(4)
830.2
 797.6
 32.6
 —
 —
Transportation and coal handling(5)
98.6
 33.1
 26.2
 12.9
 26.4
Other(6) 
9.4
 2.9
 3.2
 2.4
 0.9
Total$2,167.6

$900.0

$198.3

$264.7

$804.6
(1)At December 31, 2018, debt consists of $700.0 million of Partnership Notes, $43.9 million of Term Loan, $10.1 million of Partnership Financing Obligation and $105.0 million of Partnership Revolver. Projected interest costs on variable rate instruments were calculated using market rates at December 31, 2018.
(2)Our operating leases include leases for land, locomotives, office equipment and other property and equipment. Operating leases include all operating leases that have initial noncancelable terms in excess of one year.
(3)Certain coal procurement contracts included in the table above were not executed at December 31, 2018. We estimate these contracts to be approximately $159 million of purchase obligations in 2019 and expect these to be finalized in the first quarter of 2019.
(4)One of the coal procurement contracts at our Jewell cokemaking facility has minimum volume requirements through 2020, with pricing set annually. Projected purchase obligations were calculated using 2019 pricing.
(5)Transportation and coal handling services consist primarily of railroad and terminal services attributable to delivery and handling of coal purchases and coke sales. Long-term commitments generally relate to locations for which limited transportation options exist and match the length of the related coke sales agreement.
(6)Primarily represents open purchase orders for materials, supplies and services.
A purchase obligation is an enforceable and legally binding agreement to purchase goods or services that specifies significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and(2)Reflects actual cash payments during the approximate timing of the transaction. Our principal purchase obligations in the ordinary course of business consist of coal and transportation and distribution services, including railroad services. We also have contractual obligations supporting financing arrangements of third-parties, contracts to acquire or construct properties, plants and equipment, and other contractual obligations, primarily related to services and materials. Most ofperiods presented for our coal purchase obligations are based on fixed prices. These purchase obligations generally include fixed or minimum volumecapital requirements. Transportation and distribution obligations also typically include required minimum volume commitments. The purchase obligation amounts in the table above are based on the minimum quantities or services to be purchased at estimated prices to be paid based on current market conditions. Accordingly, the actual amounts may vary significantly from the estimates included in the table.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have letters of credit disclosed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements as well as operating leases disclosed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we had outstanding surety bonds with third parties of approximately $24 million as of December 31, 2018 to secure reclamation and other performance commitments. Other than these arrangements, the Company has not entered into any transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements that would result in material off-balance sheet liabilities.


50
Table of Contents


Impact of Inflation
Although the impact of inflation has been relatively low in recent years, it is still a factor in the U.S. economy and may increase the cost to acquire or replace properties, plants, and equipment and may increase the costs of labor and supplies. To the extent permitted by competition, regulation and existing agreements, we have generally passed along increased costs to our customers in the form of higher fees and we expect to continue this practice.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Our management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide the users of theour financial statements with useful and reliable information about our operating results and financial condition. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Significant items that are subject to such estimates and assumptions consist of: (1) black lung benefit obligations and (2) accounting for impairments of goodwill and (2) black lung benefit obligations.long-lived assets. Although our management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results may differ to some extent from the estimates on which our consolidated financial statements have been prepared at any point in time. Despite these inherent limitations, our management believes the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and consolidated financial statements and footnotes provide a meaningful and fair perspective of our financial condition.
Accounting for Impairments of Goodwill
Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired, is tested for impairment as of October 1 of each year, or when events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit to below its carrying value. We perform our annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. We would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.
The Logistics reporting unit had goodwill of $73.5 million as of December 31, 2018. The goodwill analysis as of October 1st resulted in the fair value of the Logistics reporting unit, which was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis, exceeding its carrying value by approximately 30 percent. A significant portion of our logistics business holds long-term, take-or-pay contracts with Murray American Coal Inc. ("Murray") and Foresight Energy LLC ("Foresight"). Key assumptions in our goodwill impairment test include continued customer performance against long-term, take-or-pay contracts, renewal of future long-term, take-or-pay contracts, incremental merchant business and a 14 percent discount rate representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital for this business line. The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments, such as the estimated future cash flows of Logistics and the discount rate used to discount such cash flows, could significantly impact the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, and therefore, impact the excess fair value above carrying value of the reporting unit. A 100 basis point change in the discount rate would not have reduced the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
Black Lung Benefit Liabilities
The Company has obligations related to coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, or black lung, benefits to certain of ourits former coal miners and their dependents. Such benefits are provided for under Title IV of the Federal Coal Mine and Safety Act of 1969 and subsequent amendments, as well as for black lung benefits provideddependents further described in the states of Virginia, Kentucky and West Virginia pursuant to workers’ compensation legislation. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which was implemented in 2010, amended previous legislation related to coal workers’ black lung obligations. PPACA provides for the automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and changes the legal criteria used to assess and award claims. We act as a self-insurer for both state and federal black lung benefits and adjust our liability each year based upon actuarial calculations of our expected future payments for these benefits. Note 13.
Our independent actuarial consultants calculate the present value of the estimated black lung liability annually based on actuarial models utilizing our population of former coal miners, historical payout patterns of both the Company and the industry, actuarial mortality rates, disability incidence, medical costs, death benefits, dependents, discount rates and the current federally mandated payout rates. The estimated liability may be impacted by future changes in the statutory mechanisms, modifications by court decisions and changes in filing patterns driven by perceptions of success by claimants and their advisors, the impact of which cannot be estimated.


51
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes discount rates utilized, active claims and the total black lung liabilities:
December 31,
20212020
Discount rate(1)
2.4 %2.0 %
Active claims332 309 
Total black lung liability (dollars in millions)(2)
$63.3 $64.6 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Discount rate(1)
4.0% 3.3%
Active claims345
 351
Black lung liability (dollars in millions)(2)
$49.4
 $50.3
(1)The discount rate is determined based on a portfolio of high-quality corporate bonds with maturities that are consistent with the estimated duration of our black lung obligations. A decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate would have increased black lung expense by $1.1$1.4 million in 2018.2021.
(2)The current portion of the black lung liability was $4.5$5.4 million and $5.4$4.6 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and was included in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
39
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes annual black lung payments and expense:
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars in millions)
Payments$4.4 $6.0 $5.2 
Expense(1)
$3.1 $15.4 $10.9 
(1)Expenses incurred in excess of annual accretion of the black lung liability in 2020 and 2019 primarily reflect the impact of changes in discount rates as well as increases in expected future claims as a result of higher refiling and approval rate assumptions.
Accounting for Impairments
Goodwill
Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, is assessed for impairment as of October 1 of each year, or when events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to below its carrying value.
Prior to 2020, a significant portion of our logistics business was from long-term, take-or-pay contracts with Murray American Coal, Inc. ("Murray") and Foresight Energy LLC ("Foresight"), which were adversely impacted by declining coal export prices and domestic demand. Murray filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 29, 2019. Foresight engaged outside counsel and financial advisors to assess restructuring options during 2019 and subsequently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 10, 2020. Both Murray and Foresight's contracts with CMT were subsequently rejected by the bankruptcy courts.
The Company concluded the impact of the events discussed above could more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Logistics reporting unit below its carrying value, requiring SunCoke to perform its annual goodwill test as of September 30, 2019. The fair value of the Logistics reporting unit, which was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis, did not exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit. Key assumptions in our goodwill impairment test included reduced forecasted volumes and reduced rates from Foresight, no further business from Murray, incremental merchant business and a discount rate of 12 percent, representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital for this business line. As a result, the Company recorded a $73.5 million non-cash, pretax impairment charge to the Logistics segment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations during 2019, which represents a full impairment of the Logistics goodwill balance. The Company's total goodwill balance at both December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $3.4 million. Please see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets are comprised of properties, plants and equipment as well as our long-lived intangible assets, comprised primarily of customer contracts, customer relationships, and permits.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. A long-lived asset, or group of assets, is considered to be impaired when the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than its carrying amount. Such estimated future cash flows are highly subjective and are based on numerous assumptions about future operations and market conditions. The impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the impaired asset, or group of assets. It is also difficult to precisely estimate fair market value because quoted market prices for our long-lived assets may not be readily available. Therefore, fair market value is generally based on the present values of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks associated with the assets being reviewed for impairment. No impairments on long-lived assets were recorded in 2021 or 2020. Please see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion on long-lived assets.
As a result of our logistics customers' events discussed above, CMT's long-lived assets, including customer contracts, customer relationships, permits and properties, plant and equipment, were also assessed for impairment as of September 30, 2019. The Company re-evaluated its projections for throughput volumes, pricing and customer performance against the existing long-term, take-or-pay contracts. The resulting undiscounted cash flows were lower than the carrying value of the asset group. Therefore, the Company assessed the fair value of the asset group to measure the amount of impairment. The fair value of the CMT long-lived assets was determined to be $112.1 million based on discounted cash flows, asset replacement cost and adjustments for capacity utilization, which are considered Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy as defined in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements. Key assumptions in our discounted cash flows
40
Table of Contents
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Payments$6.3
 $7.4
 $7.8
Expense$5.4
 $7.5
 $8.1
included reduced forecasted volumes and reduced rates from Foresight, no further business from Murray, incremental merchant business and a discount rate of 11 percent, representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital for this
asset group. As a result, during 2019, the Company recorded a total non-cash, pre-tax long-lived asset impairment charge of $173.9 million included in long-lived asset and goodwill impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, all of which was attributable to the Logistics segment. The charge included an impairment of CMT's long-lived intangible assets of $113.3 million and of CMT's property, plant and equipment of $60.6 million.
Recent Accounting Standards
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.


52
Table of Contents



Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to the GAAP results provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have provided a non-GAAP financial measure, Adjusted EBITDA. Our management, as well as certain investors, uses this non-GAAP measure to analyze our current and expected future financial performance and liquidity.performance. This measure is not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP and may be different from, or inconsistent with, non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. See Note 1920 in our consolidated financial statements for both the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliationsthe reconciliation from GAAP to the non-GAAP measurement for 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.
Below
Guarantor Financial and Non-Financial Disclosures
The Company has an existing shelf registration statement, which was filed on November 8, 2019, upon the expiration of the prior shelf registration statement, for the offering of debt and/or securities on a delayed or continuous basis and is presenting these guarantor financial and non-financial disclosures in connection therewith. The following information has been prepared and presented pursuant to amended SEC Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X and new SEC Rule 13-01 of Regulation S-X, which were adopted by the SEC on March 2, 2020.
For purposes of the following information, SunCoke Energy, Inc. is referred to as “Issuer.” All 100 percent owned subsidiaries of the Company are expected to serve as guarantors of obligations (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”) included in the shelf registration statement, other than the Indiana Harbor partnership and certain of the Company’s corporate financing, international and legacy coal mining subsidiaries ("Non-Guarantors"). These guarantees will be full and unconditional (subject, in the case of the Guarantor Subsidiaries, to customary release provisions as described below) and joint and several.
The guarantee of a reconciliationGuarantor Subsidiary will terminate upon:
•a sale or other disposition of 2019 Adjusted EBITDA guidancethe Guarantor Subsidiary or of all or substantially all of its assets;
•a sale of the majority of the capital stock of a Guarantor Subsidiary to a third-party, after which the Guarantor Subsidiary is no longer a “Restricted Subsidiary” in accordance with the indenture governing the notes;
•the liquidation or dissolution of a Guarantor Subsidiary so long as no “Default” or "Event of Default”, as defined under the indenture governing the notes, has occurred as a result thereof;
•the designation of a Guarantor Subsidiary as an “unrestricted subsidiary” in accordance with the indenture governing the notes;
•the requirements for defeasance or discharge of the indenture governing the notes having been satisfied; or
•the release, other than the discharge through payments by a Guarantor Subsidiary, from its closest GAAP measures:other indebtedness that resulted in the obligation of the Guarantor Subsidiary under the indenture governing the notes.

41
Table of Contents
  2019
  Low High
Net Cash Provided by Operating activities $180
 $195
Subtract:    
Depreciation and amortization expense 150
 145
Changes in working capital and other (14) (1)
Net Income $44
 $51
Add:    
Depreciation and amortization expense 150
 145
Interest expense, net 65
 65
Income tax expense 6
 14
Adjusted EBITDA $265
 $275
Subtract: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interest(1)
 83
 87
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc. $182
 $188
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis after intercompany balances and transactions between the Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries have been eliminated and excluding investment in and equity in earnings from the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
(1)Statements of Operations
Reflects non-controlling interests
Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries
Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Indiana Harbormillions)
Revenues$1,080.7 
Costs and the portion of the Partnership owned by public unitholders.operating expenses961.2 
Operating income119.5 
Net income$23.4 

Balance SheetIssuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in millions)
Assets:
Cash$10.9 
Current receivables from Non-Guarantor subsidiaries25.7 
Other current assets175.2 
Properties, plants and equipment, net1,158.2 
Other non-current assets65.4 
Total assets$1,435.4 
Liabilities:
Current liabilities$143.2 
Long-term debt and financing obligation610.4 
Long-term payable to Non-Guarantor subsidiaries200.0 
Other long-term liabilities251.6 
Total liabilities$1,205.2 



42
53
Table of Contents


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, among others, in the sections entitled “Business,” “Risk Factors,” "Quantitative“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk"Risk” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Such forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, potential growth opportunities, potential operating performance, the effects of competition and the effects of future legislation or regulations. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “may,” “will,” “should” or the negative of these terms or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the information concerning our expectations regarding the future impact of COVID-19 and the related economic conditions on our business, financial condition and results of operations, possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, potential growth opportunities, potential operating performance, the effects of competition, the anticipated expansion into the foundry coke market and the effects of future legislation or regulations. In particular,addition, statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K concerning future dividend declarations are subject to approval by our Board of Directors and will be based upon circumstances then existing. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, but are based upon the current knowledge, beliefs and expectations of SunCoke management, and upon assumptions by SunCoke concerning future conditions, any or all of which ultimately may prove to be inaccurate.
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We do not have any intention or obligation to update any forward-looking statement (or its associated cautionary language), whether as a result of new information or future events, after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by applicable law.
The risk factors discussed in “Risk Factors” could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There also may be other risks that are currently unknown to us or that we are unable to predict at this time. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation:
changes in levels•the potential operating and financial impacts on our operations, or those of production, production capacity, pricing and/our customers and suppliers, and the general impact on our industry and on the U.S. and global economy, resulting from COVID-19 or margins for coalany other widespread contagion, including actions by foreign and coke;domestic governments and others to contain the spread, or mitigate the severity, thereof;
variation in availability, quality•volatility and supply of metallurgical coal usedcyclical downturns in the cokemaking process, including as a result of non-performance bysteel industry and in other industries in which our suppliers;customers and/or suppliers operate;
changes in the marketplace that may affect our logistics business, including the supply and demand for thermal and metallurgical coal;
•changes in the marketplace that may affect our cokemaking business, including the supply and demand for our coke products, as well as increased imports of coke from foreign producers;
competition from alternative steelmaking•volatility, cyclical downturns and other technologieschange in the business climate and market for coal, affecting customers or potential customers for our logistics business;
•changes in the marketplace that havemay affect our logistics business, including the potential to reduce or eliminate the use of coke;supply and demand for thermal and metallurgical coal;
our dependence on, relationships with, and other conditions affecting our customers;
our dependence on, relationships with, and other conditions affecting our suppliers;
•severe financial hardship or bankruptcy of one or more of our major customers, or the occurrence of a customer default or other event affecting our ability to collect payments from our customers;
volatility and cyclical downturns in the steel industry and in other industries in which our customers and/or suppliers operate;
volatility, cyclical downturns and other change in the business climate and market for coal, affecting customers or potential customers for the Partnership's logistics business;
our significant equity interest in the Partnership;
•our ability to repair aging coke ovens to maintain operational performance;
our ability to enter into new, or renew existing, long-term agreements upon favorable terms for the sale of coke, steam, or electric power, or for handling services of coal and other aggregates (including transportation, storage and mixing);
the Partnership's ability to enter into new, or renew existing, agreements upon favorable terms for logistics services;
our ability to identify acquisitions, execute them under favorable terms, and integrate them into our existing business operations;


54
Table of Contents


our ability to consummate investments under favorable terms, including with respect to existing cokemaking facilities, which may utilize by-product technology, and integrate them into our existing businesses and have them perform at anticipated levels;
our ability to develop, design, permit, construct, start up, or operate new cokemaking facilities in the U.S. or in foreign countries;
our ability to successfully implement domestic and/or our international growth strategies;
our ability to realize expected benefits from investments and acquisitions;
•age of, and changes in the reliability, efficiency and capacity of the various equipment and operating facilities used in our cokemaking operations, and in the operations of our subsidiaries major customers, business partners and/or suppliers;  
•changes in the expected operating levels of our assets;
our ability to meet minimum volume requirements, coal-to-coke yield standards and coke quality standards in our coke sales agreements;
•changes in the level of capital expenditures or operating expenses, including any changes in the level of environmental capital, operating or remediation expenditures;
•changes in levels of production, production capacity, pricing and/or margins for coal and coke;
•changes in product specifications for the coke that we produce or the coals we mix, store and transport;
•our ability to servicemeet minimum volume requirements, coal-to-coke yield standards and coke quality standards in our outstanding indebtedness;coke sales agreements;
our ability to comply with
43
Table of Contents
•variation in availability, quality and supply of metallurgical coal used in the restrictions imposedcokemaking process, including as a result of non-performance by our financing arrangements;suppliers;
our ability to comply with applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those relating to environmental matters;
nonperformance or force majeure by, or disputes with, or changes in contract terms with, major customers, suppliers, dealers, distributors or other business partners;
availability•effects of skilled employees for our cokemaking, and/or logistics operations,geologic conditions, weather, natural disasters and other workplace factors;inherent risks beyond our control;
effects of railroad, barge, truck and other transportation performance and costs, including any transportation disruptions;
•effects of adverse events relating to the operation of our facilities and to the transportation and storage of hazardous materials or regulated media (including equipment malfunction, explosions, fires, spills, impoundment failure and the effects of severe weather conditions);
•the existence of hazardous substances or other environmental contamination on property owned or used by us;
•required permits and other regulatory approvals and compliance with contractual obligations and/or bonding requirements in connection with our cokemaking, logistics operations, and/or former coal mining activities;
•the availability of future permits authorizing the disposition of certain mining waste and the management of reclamation areas;
•risks related to environmental compliance;
•our ability to comply with applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those relating to environmental matters;
•risks related to labor relations and workplace safety;
•availability of skilled employees for our cokemaking, and/or logistics operations, and other workplace factors;
•our ability to service our outstanding indebtedness;
•our indebtedness and certain covenants in our debt documents;
•our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions imposed by our financing arrangements;
•changes in the availability and cost of equity and debt financing;
•impacts on our liquidity and ability to raise capital as a result of changes in the credit ratings assigned to our indebtedness;
•competition from alternative steelmaking and other technologies that have the potential to reduce or eliminate the use of coke;
•our dependence on, relationships with, and other conditions affecting our customers and/or suppliers;
•consolidation of major customers;
•nonperformance or force majeure by, or disputes with, or changes in contract terms with, major customers, suppliers, dealers, distributors or other business partners;
•effects of adverse events relating to the business or commercial operations of our customers and/or suppliers;
•changes in credit terms required by our suppliers;
•our ability to secure new coal supply agreements or to renew existing coal supply agreements;
•effects of railroad, barge, truck and other transportation performance and costs, including any transportation disruptions;
•our ability to enter into new, or renew existing, long-term agreements upon favorable terms for the sale of coke, steam, or electric power, or for handling services of coal and other aggregates (including transportation, storage and mixing);
•our ability to enter into new, or renew existing, agreements upon favorable terms for logistics services;
•our ability to successfully implement domestic and/or international growth strategies;
•our ability to identify acquisitions, execute them under favorable terms, and integrate them into our existing business operations;
•our ability to realize expected benefits from investments and acquisitions;
•our ability to enter into joint ventures and other similar arrangements under favorable terms;
44
Table of Contents
•our ability to consummate assets sales, other divestitures and strategic restructuring in a timely manner upon favorable terms, and/or realize the anticipated benefits from such actions;
•our ability to consummate investments under favorable terms, including with respect to existing cokemaking facilities, which may utilize by-product technology, and integrate them into our existing businesses and have them perform at anticipated levels;
•our ability to develop, design, permit, construct, start up, or operate new cokemaking facilities in the U.S. or in foreign countries;
•disruption in our information technology infrastructure and/or loss of our ability to securely store, maintain, or transmit data due to security breach by hackers, employee error or malfeasance, terrorist attack, power loss, telecommunications failure or other events;
•the accuracy of our ability to enter into joint venturesestimates of reclamation and other similar arrangements under favorable terms;environmental obligations;
our ability to consummate assets sales, other divestitures and strategic restructuring in a timely manner upon favorable terms, and/or realize the anticipated benefits from such actions;
changes in the availability and cost of equity and debt financing;
impacts on our liquidity and ability to raise capital as a result of changes in the credit ratings assigned to our indebtedness;
changes in credit terms required by our suppliers;
risks related to labor relations and workplace safety;
proposed or final changes in existing, or new, statutes, regulations, rules, governmental policies and taxes, or their interpretations, including those relating to environmental matters and taxes;
the existence of hazardous substances or other environmental contamination on property owned or used by us;
the availability of future permits authorizing the disposition of certain mining waste and the management of reclamation areas;


55
Table of Contents


•risks related to obligations under mineral leases retained by us in connection with the divestment of our legacy coal mining business;
risks related to environmental compliance;
•risks related to the ability of the assignee(s) to perform in compliance with applicable requirements under mineral leases assigned in connection with the divestment of our legacy coal mining business;
claims of noncompliance with any statutory•proposed or regulatory requirements;final changes in existing, or new, statutes, regulations, rules, governmental policies and taxes, or their interpretations, including those relating to environmental matters and taxes;
•proposed or final changes in accounting and/or tax methodologies, laws, regulations, rules, or policies, or their interpretations, including those affecting inventories, leases, post-employment benefits, income, or other matters;
historical consolidated financial data may not be reliable indicator of future results;
public company costs;
our indebtedness and certain covenants in our debt documents;
our ability to secure new coal supply agreements or to renew existing coal supply agreements;
required permits and other regulatory approvals and compliance with contractual obligations and/or bonding requirements in connection with our cokemaking, logistics operations, and/or former coal mining activities;
•changes in product specifications forfederal, state, or local tax laws or regulations, including the coke that we produceinterpretations thereof;
•claims of noncompliance with any statutory or the coals we mix, store and transport;regulatory requirements;
•changes in insurance markets impacting cost, level and/or types of coverage available, and the financial ability of our insurers to meet their obligations;
changes in tax laws or their interpretations, including regulations governing the federal income tax treatment•inadequate protection of the Partnership;our intellectual property rights;
•volatility in foreign currency exchange rates affecting the markets and geographic regions in which we conduct business; and
the accuracy•historical consolidated financial data may not be reliable indicators of our estimates of reclamation and other mine closure obligations;
inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights; and
effects of geologic conditions, weather, natural disasters and other inherent risks beyond our control.future results.
The factors identified above are believed to be important factors, but not necessarily all of the important factors, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us. Other factors not discussed herein also could have material adverse effects on us. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.

45

56
Table of Contents


Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary areas of market risk include changes in: (1) the price of coal, which is the key raw material for our cokemaking business; (2) interest rates; and (3) foreign currency exchange rates. We do not enter into any market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes.
Price of coal
We did not use derivatives to hedge any of our coal purchases or sales. Although we have not previously done so, we may enter into derivative financial instruments from time to time in the future to economically manage our exposure related to these market risks.
For our Domestic Coke segment, the largest component of the price of our coke is coal cost. However, under thelong-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements at all of our Domestic Coke cokemaking facilities, coal costs are a pass-through component of the coke price, provided that we are able to realize certain targeted coal-to-coke yields. As such, when targeted coal-to-coke yields are achieved, the price of coal is not a significant determining factor in the profitability of these facilities. The coal component of the Jewell coke price ishas historically been fixed annually for each calendar year based on the weighted-average contract price of third-party coal purchases at our Haverhill facility applicable to AM USACliffs Steel coke sales. Therefore,Beginning in 2022, Jewell coal purchases will be passed through at actual cost rather than at the price of Haverhill's coal, consistent with our other long-term, take-or-pay agreements. Additionally, we are subject to market risk for the price of coals used to produce any tonnage in excess of those tons contracted in our long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements, specifically as it relates to the extent the cost to procure coal at Jewel differs from the amount allowable to be passed through to our customerexport and foundry coke markets. Export coke sales are based on Haverhill's coal price.market pricing at the time of sale, and do not contain the same pass-through provisions as our long-term, take-or-pay agreements. Our foundry coke prices are largely set at the time we negotiate our coal purchases.
The provisions of our coke sales agreements require us to meet minimum production levels and generally require us to secure replacement coke supplies at the prevailing market price if we do not meet contractual minimum volumes. Because market prices for coke are generally highly correlated to market prices for metallurgical coal, to the extent any of our facilities are unable to produce their contractual minimum volumes, we are subject to market risk related to the procurement of replacement supplies.
Interest rates
We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of borrowing activities with variable interest rates and interest earned on our cash balances. During the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the daily average outstanding balance on borrowings with variable interest rates was $172.5$102.8 million and $184.3$147.9 million, respectively. Assuming a 50 basis point change in LIBOR, interest expense would have been impacted by $0.9$0.5 million and $0.7 million in 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. At December 31, 2018,2021, we had outstanding borrowings with variable interest rates of $105.0$115.0 million under the Partnership Revolver and $43.9 million under the Term Loan.Revolving Facility.
At December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $145.7$63.8 million and $120.2$48.4 million, respectively, which accruesaccrue interest at various rates. Assuming a 50 basis point change in the rate of interest associated with our cash and cash equivalents, interest income would have been impacted by $0.7$0.3 million and $0.6$0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
Foreign currency
Because we operate outside the U.S., we are subject to risk resulting from changes in the Brazil RealBrazilian real currency exchange rates. The currency exchange rates are influenced by a variety of economic factors including local inflation, growth, interest rates and governmental actions, as well as other factors. Revenues and expenses of our foreign operations are translated at average exchange rates during the period and balance sheet accounts are translated at period-end exchange rates. Balance sheet translation adjustments are excluded from the results of operations and are recorded in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensivecomprehensive loss. If the currency exchange rates had changed by 10 percent, we estimate the impact to our net income in 20182021 and 20172020 would have been approximately $0.4$0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

$0.3 million.

46
57
Table of Contents


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
5948
6150
6251
6352
6453
6554
6856
6856
6957
7259
7360
7560
7862
7863
7863
8064
8065
8367
8367
8569
71
8772
8873
9377
9477
9578
9679
20. Selected Quarterly Data (unaudited)
100
21. Supplemental Condensed Combining and Consolidating Financial Information
101



47
58
Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
SunCoke Energy, Inc.:
Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SunCoke Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control -– Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021 based on criteria established in Internal Control -– Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Basis for OpinionOpinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyCompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


48
59
Table of Contents


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Evaluation of the Company’s estimated black lung benefit liability
As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has obligations related to coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, or black lung, benefits to certain former coal miners and their dependents. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s black lung benefit liability was $63.3 million. The Company, with the assistance of an external expert, estimated the liability using an actuarial model with several assumptions.
We identified the evaluation of the Company’s estimated black lung benefit liability as a critical audit matter. There was a high degree of subjective auditor judgment in evaluating the actuarial model and key assumptions in the actuarial model. The actuarial model included internally-developed assumptions related to expected claim filing patterns and expected claimant success rates. There was limited market information from which to develop these assumptions, and therefore subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the relevance and reliability of internally-developed information.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s process to estimate the black lung benefit liability, including controls related to the development of assumptions related to the expected claim filing patterns and claimant success rates. We evaluated the Company’s assumptions related to expected claim filing patterns and the claimant success rates by comparing the assumptions to industry filing patterns and claimant success rates. We performed sensitivity analyses over the expected claim filing patterns and claimant success rate assumptions to assess their impact on the Company’s estimated black lung liability. We compared the Company’s historical black lung payment estimates to actual payments to assess the accuracy of previous estimates related to its black lung benefit liability. In addition, we involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in evaluating the expected claim filing patterns and expected claimant success rates assumptions used by the Company to estimate its black lung benefit liability by comparing the assumptions to industry standards.

/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
Chicago, Illinois
February 15, 2019



24, 2022

49
60
Table of Contents



SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenues
Sales and other operating revenue$1,456.0 $1,333.0 $1,600.3 
Costs and operating expenses
Cost of products sold and operating expenses1,118.8 1,048.2 1,277.6 
Selling, general and administrative expenses61.8 81.4 75.8 
Depreciation and amortization expense133.9 133.7 143.8 
Long-lived asset and goodwill impairment— — 247.4 
Total costs and operating expenses1,314.5 1,263.3 1,744.6 
Operating income (loss)141.5 69.7 (144.3)
Interest expense, net42.5 56.3 60.3 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net31.9 (5.7)(1.5)
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)67.1 19.1 (203.1)
Income tax expense (benefit)18.3 10.3 (54.7)
Net income (loss)48.8 8.8 (148.4)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests5.4 5.1 3.9 
Net income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$43.4 $3.7 $(152.3)
Earnings (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc. per common share:
Basic$0.52 $0.04 $(1.98)
Diluted$0.52 $0.04 $(1.98)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic83.0 83.0 76.8 
Diluted83.7 83.2 76.8 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenues     
Sales and other operating revenue$1,450.9
 $1,331.5
 $1,223.3
Costs and operating expenses     
Cost of products sold and operating expenses1,124.5
 1,020.1
 905.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses66.1
 79.0
 90.6
Depreciation and amortization expense141.6
 128.2
 114.2
Loss on divestiture of business—
 —
 14.7
Total costs and operating expenses1,332.2
 1,227.3
 1,125.4
Operating income118.7
 104.2
 97.9
Interest expense, net61.4
 61.9
 54.8
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt0.3
 20.4
 (25.0)
Income before income tax expense (benefit) and loss from equity method investment57.0
 21.9
 68.1
Income tax expense (benefit)4.6
 (81.6) 8.6
Loss from equity method investment5.4
 —
 —
Net income47.0
 103.5
 59.5
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests20.8
 (18.9) 45.1
Net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$26.2
 $122.4
 $14.4
Earnings attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc. per common share:     
Basic$0.40
 $1.90
 $0.22
Diluted$0.40
 $1.88
 $0.22
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:     
Basic64.7
 64.3
 64.2
Diluted65.5
 65.2
 64.4


(See Accompanying Notes)






50
61
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars in millions)
Net income (loss)$48.8 $8.8 $(148.4)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassifications of actuarial loss amortization and prior service benefit to earnings (net of related tax benefit of $0.1 million in 2021 and zero for 2020 and 2019)0.3 0.1 — 
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax (expense) benefit of $(0.3) million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively)1.0 (1.6)(0.7)
Currency translation adjustment(0.9)(1.2)(0.6)
Comprehensive income (loss)49.2 6.1 (149.7)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests5.4 5.1 3.9 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$43.8 $1.0 $(153.6)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Net income$47.0
 $103.5
 $59.5
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Reclassifications of actuarial loss amortization and prior service benefit to earnings (net of related tax expense of zero for all years)(0.1) 0.2
 —
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax benefit of $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively)0.6
 (0.8) (0.2)
Currency translation adjustment(1.4) (0.5) 1.0
Recognition of accumulated currency translation loss upon sale of equity method investment9.0
 —
 —
Comprehensive income55.1
 102.4
 60.3
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests20.8
 (18.9) 45.1
Comprehensive income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$34.3
 $121.3
 $15.2

(See Accompanying Notes)

51


62
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
20212020
(Dollars in millions, 
except par value amounts)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$63.8 $48.4 
Receivables, net77.6 46.3 
Inventories127.0 126.6 
Income tax receivable— 5.5 
Other current assets3.5 2.9 
Total current assets271.9 229.7 
Properties, plants and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $1,160.1 and $1,032.9 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively)1,287.9 1,328.0 
Intangible assets, net35.2 37.2 
Deferred charges and other assets20.4 18.5 
Total assets$1,615.4 $1,613.4 
Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable$126.0 $104.1 
Accrued liabilities53.0 49.8 
Current portion of financing obligation3.2 3.0 
Interest payable— 2.0 
Total current liabilities182.2 158.9 
Long-term debt and financing obligation610.4 673.9 
Accrual for black lung benefits57.9 60.0 
Retirement benefit liabilities21.8 24.7 
Deferred income taxes169.0 159.3 
Asset retirement obligations11.6 11.4 
Other deferred credits and liabilities27.1 24.3 
Total liabilities1,080.0 1,112.5 
Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; no issued shares at both December 31, 2021 and 2020— — 
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 300,000,000 shares; issued 98,496,809 and 98,177,941 shares at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively1.0 1.0 
Treasury stock, 15,404,482 shares at both December 31, 2021 and 2020(184.0)(184.0)
Additional paid-in capital721.2 715.7 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(16.7)(17.1)
Retained deficit(23.4)(46.6)
Total SunCoke Energy, Inc. stockholders' equity498.1 469.0 
Noncontrolling interests37.3 31.9 
Total equity535.4 500.9 
Total liabilities and equity$1,615.4 $1,613.4 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
 
(Dollars in millions, 
except par value amounts)
Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$145.7
 $120.2
Receivables75.4
 68.5
Inventories110.4
 111.0
Income tax receivable0.7
 4.8
Other current assets2.8
 6.7
Total current assets335.0
 311.2
Properties, plants and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $855.8 million and $733.2 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively)1,471.1
 1,501.3
Goodwill76.9
 76.9
Other intangible assets, net156.8
 167.9
Deferred charges and other assets5.5
 2.8
Total assets$2,045.3
 $2,060.1
Liabilities and Equity   
Accounts payable$115.0
 $115.5
Accrued liabilities45.6
 53.2
Deferred revenue3.0
 1.7
Current portion of long-term debt and financing obligation3.9
 2.6
Interest payable3.6
 5.4
Total current liabilities171.1
 178.4
Long-term debt and financing obligation834.5
 861.1
Accrual for black lung benefits44.9
 44.9
Retirement benefit liabilities25.2
 28.2
Deferred income taxes254.7
 257.8
Asset retirement obligations14.6
 14.0
Other deferred credits and liabilities17.6
 16.1
Total liabilities1,362.6
 1,400.5
Equity   
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; no issued shares at both December 31, 2018 and 2017—
 —
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 300,000,000 shares; issued 72,233,750 and 72,006,905 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively0.7
 0.7
Treasury stock, 7,477,657 shares at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively(140.7) (140.7)
Additional paid-in capital488.8
 486.2
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(13.1) (21.2)
Retained earnings127.4
 101.2
Total SunCoke Energy, Inc. stockholders' equity463.1
 426.2
Noncontrolling interests219.6
 233.4
Total equity682.7
 659.6
Total liabilities and equity$2,045.3
 $2,060.1

(See Accompanying Notes)




52
63
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net income$47.0
 $103.5
 $59.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization expense141.6
 128.2
 114.2
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense(3.4) (87.2) 3.1
Payments in excess of expense for postretirement plan benefits(2.4) (1.8) (2.6)
Share-based compensation expense3.1
 4.8
 6.5
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net0.3
 20.4
 (25.0)
Loss on divestiture of business—
 —
 14.7
Loss from equity method investment5.4
 —
 —
Changes in working capital pertaining to operating activities (net of the effects of divestiture):     
Receivables(6.9) (7.8) 3.7
Inventories0.6
 (18.5) 29.4
Accounts payable(0.7) 11.7
 (0.8)
Accrued liabilities(7.3) 2.6
 6.8
Deferred revenue1.3
 (0.8) 0.4
Interest payable(1.8) (10.8) (2.7)
Income taxes4.5
 (0.2) 7.0
Other4.5
 4.4
 4.9
Net cash provided by operating activities185.8
 148.5
 219.1
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:     
Capital expenditures(100.3) (75.6) (63.7)
Return of Brazilian investment—
 20.5
 20.5
Divestiture of coal business—
 —
 (12.8)
Sale of equity method investment4.0
 —
 —
Other investing activities0.5
 —
 2.1
Net cash used in investing activities(95.8) (55.1) (53.9)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt45.0
 693.7
 —
Repayment of long-term debt(45.7) (644.9) (66.1)
Debt issuance costs(0.5) (17.4) (0.2)
Proceeds from revolving facility179.5
 350.0
 28.0
Repayment of revolving facility(204.5) (392.0) (98.4)
Proceeds from financing obligation—
 —
 16.2
Repayment of financing obligation(2.6) (2.5) (1.0)
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests(31.9) (47.0) (49.4)
Acquisition of additional interest in the Partnership(4.2) (48.7) —
Other financing activities0.4
 1.1
 (1.4)
Net cash used in financing activities(64.5) (107.7) (172.3)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash25.5
 (14.3) (7.1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year120.2
 134.5
 141.6
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$145.7
 $120.2
 $134.5
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information     
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest of $3.2 million, $1.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively$59.6
 $67.9
 $53.4
Income taxes paid, net of refunds of $4.3 million, $1.0 million and $8.2 million, respectively$3.7
 $5.8
 $(2.3)
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars in millions)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)$48.8 $8.8 $(148.4)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Long-lived asset and goodwill impairment— — 247.4 
Depreciation and amortization expense133.9 133.7 143.8 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)9.3 12.1 (63.1)
Share-based compensation expense6.1 3.8 4.5 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net31.9 (5.7)(1.5)
Changes in working capital pertaining to operating activities:
Receivables, net(31.3)13.2 15.9 
Inventories(1.1)21.8 (36.6)
Accounts payable29.5 (38.0)23.5 
Accrued liabilities2.8 2.5 (2.4)
Interest payable(2.0)(0.2)(1.4)
Income taxes5.5 (3.3)(1.5)
Other(0.3)9.1 1.7 
Net cash provided by operating activities233.1 157.8 181.9 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures(98.6)(73.9)(110.1)
Other investing activities(0.7)(1.4)0.3 
Net cash used in investing activities(99.3)(75.3)(109.8)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt500.0 — — 
Repayment of long-term debt(609.3)(55.9)(90.5)
Proceeds from revolving facility690.1 629.9 408.6 
Repayment of revolving facility(663.4)(684.9)(370.3)
Proceeds from financing obligation— 10.0 — 
Repayment of financing obligation(2.9)(3.0)(2.9)
Debt issuance costs(12.0)— (2.1)
Dividends paid(20.1)(19.9)(5.1)
Shares repurchased— (7.0)(36.3)
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests— — (14.2)
Other financing activities(0.8)(0.4)(7.9)
Net cash used in financing activities(118.4)(131.2)(120.7)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents15.4 (48.7)(48.6)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year48.4 97.1 145.7 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$63.8 $48.4 $97.1 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest of $0.5 million, $0.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively$40.0 $51.8 $58.2 
Income taxes paid, net of refunds of $2.9 million, $3.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively$2.9 $1.1 $9.5 
(See Accompanying Notes)


53
64
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Equity

 Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional
Paid-In
Capital		 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss		 Retained
Earnings		 Total SunCoke
Energy, Inc. Equity		 Non- controlling
Interests		 Total
Equity
 Shares Amount Shares Amount     
 (Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 201571,489,448
 $0.7
 7,477,657
 $(140.7) $486.1
 $(19.8) $(36.4) $289.9
 $332.9
 $622.8
Net income—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 14.4
 14.4
 45.1
 59.5
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax benefit of $0.1 million)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (0.2) —
 (0.2) —
 (0.2)
Currency translation adjustment—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 1.0
 —
 1.0
 —
 1.0
Cash distribution to noncontrolling interests, net of unit issuances—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (49.2) (49.2)
Share-based compensation expense—
 —
 —
 —
 6.5
 —
 —
 6.5
 —
 6.5
Share issuances, net of shares withheld for taxes and other equity activities217,856
 —
 —
 —
 (0.5) —
 —
 (0.5) —
 (0.5)
At December 31, 201671,707,304
 $0.7
 7,477,657
 $(140.7) $492.1
 $(19.0) $(22.0)
$311.1
 $328.8
 $639.9
Common StockTreasury StockAdditional
Paid-In
Capital		Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss		Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)		Total SunCoke
Energy, Inc. Equity		Non- controlling
Interests		Total
Equity
SharesAmountSharesAmount
(Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 201872,233,750 $0.7 7,477,657 $(140.7)$488.8 $(13.1)$127.4 $463.1 $219.6 $682.7 
Net (loss) income— — — — — — (152.3)(152.3)3.9 (148.4)
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax benefit of $0.3 million)— — — — — (0.7)— (0.7)— (0.7)
Currency translation adjustment— — — — — (0.6)— (0.6)— (0.6)
Share-based compensation expense— — — — 4.5 — — 4.5 — 4.5 
Share issuances, net of shares withheld for taxes359,988 — — — (1.7)— — (1.7)— (1.7)
Share repurchases— — 6,305,525 (36.3)— — — (36.3)— (36.3)
Dividends— — — — — — (5.2)(5.2)— (5.2)
Cash distribution to noncontrolling interest— — — — — — — — (14.2)(14.2)
Simplification Transaction:
Share issuances, for the acquisition of Partnership public units24,818,149 0.3 — — 182.2 — — 182.5 (182.5)— 
Share issuances, for the final Partnership distribution635,502 — — — — — — — — — 
Transaction costs— — — — (5.4)— — (5.4)— (5.4)
Deferred tax adjustment— — — — 43.7 — — 43.7 — 43.7 
At December 31, 201998,047,389 $1.0 13,783,182 $(177.0)$712.1 $(14.4)$(30.1)$491.6 $26.8 $518.4 


(See Accompanying Notes)




54
65
Table of Contents



SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Equity

 Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional
Paid-In
Capital		 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss		 Retained
Earnings		 Total SunCoke
Energy, Inc. Equity		 Non- controlling
Interests		 Total
Equity
 Shares Amount Shares Amount     
 (Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 201671,707,304
 $0.7
 7,477,657
 $(140.7) $492.1
 $(19.0) $(22.0) $311.1
 $328.8
 $639.9
Net income (loss)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 122.4
 122.4
 (18.9) 103.5
Reclassifications of prior service cost and actuarial loss amortization to earnings (net of related tax expense of zero)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 0.2
 —
 0.2
 —
 0.2
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax benefit of $0.3 million)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (0.8) —
 (0.8) —
 (0.8)
Currency translation adjustment—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (0.5) —
 (0.5) —
 (0.5)
Cash distribution to noncontrolling interest—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (47.0) (47.0)
Share-based compensation expense—
 —
 —
 —
 4.7
 —
 —
 4.7
 0.1
 4.8
Share-issuances, net of shares withheld for taxes299,601
 

 —
 —
 1.1
 —
 —
 1.1
 —
 1.1
Acquisition of additional interest in the Partnership:                   
Cash paid—
 —
 —
 —
 (19.1) —
 —
 (19.1) (29.6) (48.7)
Deferred tax adjustment—
 —
 —
 —
 7.1
 —
 —
 7.1
 —
 7.1
Cumulative effect from adoption of ASU 2016-09—
 —
 —
 —
 0.3
 —
 (0.3) —
 —
 —
Cumulative effect from adoption of ASU 2018-02—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (1.1) 1.1
 —
 —
 —
At December 31, 201772,006,905
 $0.7
 7,477,657
 $(140.7) $486.2
 $(21.2) $101.2
 $426.2
 $233.4
 $659.6

Common StockTreasury StockAdditional
Paid-In
Capital		Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss		Retained
Deficit		Total SunCoke
Energy, Inc. Equity		Non- controlling
Interests		Total
Equity
SharesAmountSharesAmount
(Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 201998,047,389 1.0 13,783,182 (177.0)712.1 (14.4)(30.1)$491.6 26.8 $518.4 
Net income— — — — — — 3.7 3.7 5.1 8.8 
Reclassification of prior service cost and actuarial loss amortization to earnings, net of tax— — — — — 0.1 — 0.1 — 0.1 
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax benefit of $0.4 million)— — — — — (1.6)— (1.6)— (1.6)
Currency translation adjustment— — — — — (1.2)— (1.2)— (1.2)
Share-based compensation expense— — — — 3.8 — — 3.8 — 3.8 
Share issuances, net of shares withheld for taxes130,552 — — — (0.2)— — (0.2)— (0.2)
Share repurchases— — 1,621,300 (7.0)— — — (7.0)— (7.0)
Dividends— — — — — — (20.2)(20.2)— (20.2)
At December 31, 202098,177,941 $1.0 15,404,482 $(184.0)$715.7 $(17.1)$(46.6)$469.0 $31.9 $500.9 
Net income— — — — — — 43.4 43.4 5.4 48.8 
Reclassification of prior service cost and actuarial loss amortization to earnings, net of tax— — — — — 0.3 — 0.3 — 0.3 
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax expense of $0.3 million)— — — — — 1.0 — 1.0 — 1.0 
Currency translation adjustment— — — — — (0.9)— (0.9)— (0.9)
Share-based compensation expense— — — — 6.1 — — 6.1 — 6.1 
Share issuances, net of shares withheld for taxes318,868 — — — (0.6)— — (0.6)— (0.6)
Dividends— — — — — — (20.2)(20.2)— (20.2)
At December 31, 202198,496,809 $1.0 15,404,482 $(184.0)$721.2 $(16.7)$(23.4)$498.1 $37.3 $535.4 
(See Accompanying Notes)

55


66
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Equity
 Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional
Paid-In
Capital		 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss		 Retained
Earnings		 Total SunCoke
Energy, Inc. Equity		 Non- controlling
Interests		 Total
Equity
 Shares Amount Shares Amount     
 (Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 201772,006,905
 $0.7
 7,477,657
 $(140.7) $486.2
 $(21.2) $101.2
 $426.2
 $233.4
 $659.6
Net income—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 26.2
 26.2
 20.8
 47.0
Reclassification of prior service cost and actuarial loss amortization to earnings, net of tax—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (0.1) —
 (0.1) —
 (0.1)
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (net of related tax benefit of $0.2 million)—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 0.6
 —
 0.6
 —
 0.6
Currency translation adjustment—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (1.4) —
 (1.4) —
 (1.4)
Recognition of accumulated currency translation loss upon sale of equity method investment—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 9.0
 —
 9.0
 —
 9.0
Cash distribution to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (31.9) (31.9)
Share-based compensation expense—
 —
 —
 —
 3.1
 —
 —
 3.1
 —
 3.1
Share-issuances, net of shares withheld for taxes226,845
 —
 —
 —
 0.7
 —
 —
 0.7
 —
 0.7
Acquisition of additional interest in the Partnership:                   
Cash paid—
 —
 —
 —
 (1.5) —
 —
 (1.5) (2.7) (4.2)
Deferred tax adjustment—
 —
 —
 —
 0.3
 —
 —
 0.3
 —
 0.3
At December 31, 201872,233,750
 $0.7
 7,477,657
 $(140.7) $488.8
 $(13.1) $127.4
 $463.1
 $219.6
 $682.7

(See Accompanying Notes)



67
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. General and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (“SunCoke Energy,” “SunCoke,” “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us”) is the largest independent producer of high-quality coke in the Americas, as measured by tons of coke produced each year, and has over 55more than 60 years of coke production experience. Coke is a principal raw material in the blast furnace steelmaking process and is produced by heating metallurgical coal in a refractory oven, which releases certain volatile components from the coal, thus transforming the coal into coke. Additionally, we own and operate a logistics business, which primarily provides handling and/or mixing services of coal and other aggregates to third-party customers as well as to our own cokemaking facilities.
We have designed, developed, built, own and operate five5 cokemaking facilities in the United States (“U.S.”) with collective nameplate capacity to produce approximately 4.2 million tons of blast furnace coke per year. Additionally, we have designed and operate one1 cokemaking facility in Brazil under licensing and operating agreements on behalf of ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A. ("ArcelorMittal Brazil”), which has approximately 1.7 million tons of annual cokemaking capacity. In order to further diversify our business and customer base, we have entered the foundry coke market. Foundry coke is a high-quality grade of coke that is used at foundries to melt iron and various metals in cupola furnaces, which is further processed via casting or molding into products used in various industries such as construction, transportation and industrial products. We began producing and selling foundry coke on a commercial scale in 2021. We also began selling blast furnace coke into the export coke market in 2021, utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for our long-term, take-or-pay agreements.
Our cokemaking ovens utilize efficient, modern heat recovery technology designed to combust the coal’s volatile components liberated during the cokemaking process and use the resulting heat to create steam or electricity for sale. This differs from by-product cokemaking, which repurposes the coal’s liberated volatile components for other uses. We have constructed the only greenfield cokemaking facilities in the U.S. in approximatelyover 30 years and are the only North American coke producer that utilizes heat recovery technology in the cokemaking process. We provide steam pursuant to steam supply and purchase agreements with our customers. Electricity is sold into the regional power market or pursuant to energy sales agreements.
Our logistics business provides handling and/or mixing services to steel, coke (including some of our domestic cokemaking facilities), electric utility, coal producing and other manufacturing based customers. The logistics business has terminals in Indiana, West Virginia, Virginia, and Louisiana with collective capacity to mix and/or transload more than 40 million tons of coal and other aggregates annually and has total storage capacity of approximatelymore than 3 million tons.
On June 27, 2018, we sold our 49 percent investment in VISA SunCoke Limited ("VISA SunCoke") for cash consideration of $4.0 million. Consequently, we recognized $9.0 million of accumulated currency translation losses and incurred $0.4 million of transaction costs, resulting in a net $5.4 million loss from equity method investment during 2018 on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Our investment in VISA SunCoke was previously accounted for as an equity method investment and was fully impaired in 2015. Therefore, its financial results had not been included in our financial statements since that time.
The Company disposed of its coal mining operations in Virginia and West Virginia to Revelation Energy, LLC ("Revelation") in April 2016. Revelation assumed substantially all of our remaining coal mining assets and real estate, and was assigned substantially all of our mineral leases and a substantial portion of our mining reclamation obligations. Under the terms of the agreement, Revelation received $12.8 million from the Company to take ownership of the assets and liabilities. During 2016, the Company recognized losses associated with this divestiture of $14.7 million.
Our consolidated financial statements include SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), a publicly-traded partnership. At December 31, 2018, we owned the general partner of the Partnership, which consists of a 2.0 percent ownership interest and incentive distribution rights ("IDRs"), and a 60.4 percent limited partner interest in the Partnership. The remaining 37.6 percent interest in the Partnership was held by public unitholders.
On February 5, 2019, the Company and the Partnership announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement whereby SunCoke will acquire all outstanding common units of the Partnership not already owned by SunCoke in a stock-for-unit merger transaction (the “Simplification Transaction”). Pursuant to the terms of this agreement (“Merger Agreement”), the Partnership's unaffiliated common unitholders will receive 1.40 SunCoke common shares plus a fraction of a SunCoke common share, based on a ratio as further described in the Merger Agreement, for each Partnership common unit. On behalf of the Partnership and its public unitholders, the terms of the Simplification Transaction were negotiated, reviewed and approved by the conflicts committee of the Board of Directors of the Partnership's general partner, which consisted solely of independent directors. The transaction was approved by the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership and the Board of Directors of SunCoke.
Following completion of the Simplification Transaction, the Partnership will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of SunCoke, the Partnership's common units will cease to be publicly traded and the Partnership's IDRs will be eliminated.  The


68
Table of Contents


Simplification Transaction is expected to close late in the second quarter of 2019 or early in the third quarter of 2019, subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval by holders of a majority of the outstanding SunCoke common shares and Partnership common units, as well as customary regulatory approvals. SunCoke indirectly owns the majority of the Partnership common units, which is sufficient to approve the transaction on behalf of the holders of Partnership common units.
Incorporated in Delaware in 2010 and headquartered in Lisle, Illinois, we became a publicly-traded company in 2011, and our stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SXC.”
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP") and include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company and all subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Our consolidated financial statements have historically included SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), which owned our Haverhill, Middletown, and Granite City cokemaking facilities and Convent Marine Terminal ("CMT"), Kanawha River Terminal ("KRT") and SunCoke Lake Terminal ("Lake Terminal"). On June 28, 2019, the Company acquired the outstanding units of the Partnership not already owned by SunCoke, at which time the Partnership became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SunCoke. See Note 3. On January 1, 2020, the Partnership merged with and into SunCoke Energy Partners Finance Corp., which is also a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest represents the common public unitholders’ interest in SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. as well as a 14.8 percent third-party interest in our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility.facility as well as the common public unitholders’ interest in the Partnership prior to the transaction discussed in Note 3.
56
Table of Contents
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. See the "Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements" section of this footnote for further details.
Revenue Recognition
The Company sells coke as well as steam and electricity and also provides mixing and/or handling services of coal and other aggregates. The Company also receives fees for operating the cokemaking plant in Brazil and for the licensing of its proprietary technology for use at this facility as well as reimbursement of substantially all of its operating costs. See Note 18.
Substantially all of the coke produced by the Company is sold pursuant to long-term contracts with its customers. The Company evaluates each of its contracts to determine whether the arrangement contains a lease under the applicable accounting standards. If the specific facts and circumstances indicate that it is remote that parties other than the contracted customer will take more than a minor amount of the coke that will be produced by the property, plant and equipment during the term of the coke supply agreement, and the price that the customer is paying for the coke is neither contractually fixed per unit nor equal to the current market price per unit at the time of delivery, then the long-term contract is deemed to contain a lease. The lease component of the price of coke represents the rental payment for the use of the property, plant and equipment, and all such payments are accounted for as contingent rentals as they are only earned by the Company when the coke is delivered and title passes to the customer. The total amount of revenue recognized by the Company for these contingent rentals represents less than 10 percent of consolidated sales and other operating revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Upon adoption of Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") 842, "Leases", in 2019, these long-term contracts to sell coke will no longer be deemed to contain operating leases.19.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. These cash equivalents consist principally of certificates of deposit.money market funds.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method, except for the Company’s materials and supplies inventory, which are determined using the average-cost method. The Company primarily utilizes the selling prices under its long-term coke supply contractsagreements to record lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustments.


69
Table of Contents



See Note 6.
Properties, Plants and Equipment
Plants and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Coke and energy plant, machinery and equipment are generally depreciated over 25 to 30 years. Logistics plant and equipment are generally depreciated over 15 to 35 years. Depreciation and amortization is excluded from cost of products sold and operating expenses and is presented separately on the Consolidated Statements of Income.Operations. Gains and losses on the disposal or retirement of fixed assets are reflected in earnings when the assets are sold or retired. Amounts incurred that extend an asset’s useful life, increase its productivity or add production capacity are capitalized. The Company accounts for changes in useful lives, when appropriate, as a change in estimate, with prospective application only. The Company capitalized interest of $3.2$0.5 million $1.1, $0.2 million, and $5.0$2.3 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Direct costs, such as outside labor, materials, internal payroll and benefits costs incurred during capital projects are capitalized; indirect costs are not capitalized. Normal repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. See Note 7.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are primarily comprised of permits. Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives in a manner that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefit of the intangible asset is consumed. Intangible assets are assessed for impairment when a triggering event occurs. See Note 8.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, which includes intangible assets and properties, plants and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. A long-lived asset, or group of assets, is considered to be impaired when the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than its carrying amount. Such estimated future cash flows are highly subjective and are based on numerous assumptions about future operations and market conditions. The impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the impaired asset, or group of assets. It is also difficult to precisely estimate fair market value because quoted market prices for our long-lived assets may not be readily available. Therefore, fair market value is generally based on the present values of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks associated with the assets being reviewed for impairment.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, is tested for impairment as of October 1 of each year, or when events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to below its carrying value. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. The Company would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. See Note 8.
Intangible assets are primarily comprised of permits, customer contracts and customer relationships. Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives in a manner that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefit of the intangible asset is consumed. Intangible assets are assessed for impairment when a triggering event occurs.
Investment in Brazilian Cokemaking Operations
On November 28, 2016, ArcelorMittal Brazil redeemed SunCoke’s indirectly held preferred and common equity interest in Sol Coqueria Tubarão S.A. ("Brazil Investment"), previously accounted for at cost, for consideration of $41.0 million. The Company received $20.5 million in cash at closing in 2016 and received the remaining $20.5 million in cash, plus interest of $0.2 million, in 2017. Starting in 2016, SunCoke receives $5.1 million in licensing fees per year, in addition to our per ton licensing fee, through 2023 related to the addition of certain patents to its existing intellectual property licensing agreement, which are currently in use by ArcelorMittal Brazil at the Brazil facility. The Company also extended the life of its patents with the Brazilian authorities through 2033, providing opportunity to extend the existing licensing agreement beyond 2023. Licensing fees are included in sales and other operating revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax asset and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those differences are projected to be recovered or settled. See Note 5.
The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions in its financial statements when minimum recognition threshold and measurement attributes are met in accordance with current accounting guidance. See Note 5.
57
Table of Contents
Black Lung Benefit Liabilities
The Company has obligations related to coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, or black lung, benefits toof certain of our former coal miners and their dependents. Such benefits are provided for under Title IV of the Federal Coal Mine and Safety Act of 1969 and subsequent amendments, as well as for black lung benefits provided in the states of Virginia, Kentucky and


70
Table of Contents


West Virginia pursuant to workers’ compensation legislation. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which was implemented in 2010, amended previous legislation related to coal workers’ black lung obligations. PPACA provides for the automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and changes the legal criteria used to assess and award claims. We act as a self-insurer for both state and federal black lung benefits and adjust our liability each year based upon actuarial calculations of our expected future payments for these benefits.benefits, including a provision for incurred but not reported losses. See Note 13.
Postretirement Benefit Plan Liabilities
The postretirement benefit plans, which are frozen, are unfunded and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is fully recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Actuarial gains (losses) and prior service costs (benefits) which have not yet been recognized in net income are recognized as a credit (charge) to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The credit (charge) to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is reflected net of related tax effects, is subsequently recognized in net income when amortized as a component of postretirement benefit plans expense included in interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income.Operations. See Note 10.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the asset and depreciated over its remaining estimated useful life. When the assumptions used to estimate a recorded asset retirement obligation change, a revision is recorded to both the asset retirement obligation and the asset retirement cost capitalized to the extent remaining useful life exists. The Company’s asset retirement obligations primarily relate to costs associated with restoring land to its original state. See Note 9.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of products sold and operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations and are generally passed through to our customers. The Company has elected the practical expedient under ASCAccounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers",Customers," to account for shipping and handling activities as a promise to fulfill the transfer of coke. See Note 19.
Share-Based Compensation
We measure the cost of employee services in exchange for equity instrument awards and cash awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cashCash awards and the performance metrics of equity awards are remeasured on a quarterly basis. The market metrics of equity awards are not remeasured. The total cost is recognized over the requisite service period. Award forfeitures are accounted for as they occur. The costs of equity awards and cash awards wereare recorded to additional paid-in capital and accrued liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 15.16.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As required, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs (levels 1 and 2) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs (level 3) within the fair value hierarchy included in current accounting guidance. Assets and liabilities are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level (least observable) input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety. See Note 17.18.
Currency Translation
The functional currency of the Company’s Brazilian operations is the Brazilian real. The Company’s Brazil operations translate its assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rates in effect at the end of the fiscal period. The gains or losses that result from this process are shown as cumulative translation adjustments within accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The revenue and expense accounts of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates during the period.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which supersedesNo accounting pronouncements adopted during the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),” and requires entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method with noyear ended December 31, 2021 had a material impact on our revenue recognition model on an annual basis. See Note 18.


71
Table of Contents


In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted cash.” The Company retrospectively adopted this ASU in the first quarter 2018 and modified the Company's cash flow presentation to include restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Historical restricted cash balances were related to cash withheld from the 2015 acquisition of CMT to fund the completion of certain expansion capital improvements, and the related immaterial impacts have been reclassified on the statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The restricted cash balance was zero at both December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter 2018 and retrospectively presented net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. In conjunction with the adoption of this standard, expense of $1.3 million was reclassified from operating income and was recorded in interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income for both the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 10.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter 2018 and reclassified $1.1 million of deferred tax adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from retained earnings on the December 31, 2017 balance sheet for the tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." ASU 2016-02 requires leases to be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than 12 months. Subsequently, the FASB has issued various ASUs to provide further clarification around certain aspects of ASC 842, "Leases".  This standard is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. A multi-disciplined implementation team has gained an understanding of the accounting and disclosure provisions of the standard and analyzed the impacts to our business, including the development of new accounting processes to account for our leases and support the required disclosures. We have implemented a technology tool to assist with the accounting and reporting requirements of this standard. While we are still finalizing the impact of adopting this standard, we expect that upon adoption the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, such as land, the lease of our corporate office space and certain equipment rentals, will increase the reported assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets by approximately $5 million to $10 million. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019, by applying the modified retrospective transition approach and electing not to adjust prior comparative periods.consolidated financial statements.
Labor Concentrations
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we have approximately 895848 employees in the U.S. Approximately 4041 percent of our domestic employees, principally at our cokemaking operations, are represented by the United Steelworkers union under various
58
Table of Contents
contracts. Additionally, approximately 3 percent of our domestic employees are represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers. While the labor agreement at our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility expired on August 31, 2015, the parties mutually agreed to extend the terms of this agreement through August 31, 2018. Currently both parties are working under the term of the contract extension while negotiating a new agreement. We do not anticipate any work stoppages during the extended period of the agreement. The laborLabor agreements at KRT, Lake Terminal, and HaverhillIndiana Harbor will expire on April 30, 2019,2022, June 30, 20192022, and NovemberSeptember 1, 2019,2022, respectively. We will negotiate the renewal of these agreements in 20192022 and do not anticipate any work stoppages.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we have approximately 285279 employees at the cokemaking facility in Vitória, Brazil, all of whom are represented by a union under a labor agreement. During 2018,2021, the labor agreement at our Vitoria,Vitória, Brazil facility was renewed for an additional year, and it expires on October 31, 2019.November 30, 2022.
3. Acquisition of Noncontrolling InterestAcquisitions and Divestitures
In 2017,Simplification Transaction
Prior to June 28, 2019, SunCoke owned a 60.4 percent limited partner interest in the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program forPartnership as well as our 2.0 percent general partner interest. The remaining 37.6 percent limited partner interest in the Partnership was held by public unitholders. On June 28, 2019, the Company to purchaseacquired all 17,727,249 outstanding common units of the Partnership not already owned by SunCoke in exchange for 24,818,149 newly issued SunCoke common shares (the "Simplification Transaction"). Additionally, the final pro-rated quarterly Partnership distribution was settled with 635,502 newly issued SunCoke common shares. Following the completion of the Simplification Transaction, the Partnership became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SunCoke, the Partnership common units at any timeceased to be publicly traded and from time to timethe Partnership’s incentive distribution rights were eliminated.
SunCoke controlled the Partnership both before and after the Simplification Transaction. Therefore, the change in the open market, through privately negotiated transactions, block transactions,our ownership interest was accounted for as an equity transaction, and no gain or otherwiseloss was recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for a total aggregate cost to the Company not to exceed $100.0 million. At December 31, 2018, there was $47.1 million available under the authorized program.this transaction.


72
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes the Company's purchasesnon-cash (decreases) increases on our balance sheet related to the Simplification Transaction, reflecting the changes in ownership of outstandingthe Partnership common unitsand a step-up in the open market:
  Years Ended December 31
  2018 2017
  (Dollars in millions)
Units purchased 231,171
 2,853,032
Cash paid $4.2
 $48.7
Decrease in noncontrolling interest (1)
 $2.7
 $29.6
Decrease in additional paid in capital (2)
 $1.2
 $12.0
tax basis in the underlying assets acquired:
(1)Represents Partnership's net book value acquired by the Company.(Dollars in millions)
Noncontrolling interest$(182.5)
(2)Deferred income taxesRepresents consideration paid in excess of the net book value of the noncontrolling interest acquired net of deferred tax adjustments of $0.3 million and $7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.$(43.7)
Common stock$0.3 
Additional paid-in capital$225.9 

Additionally, the Company incurred transaction costs totaling $11.0 million, of which $5.4 million were incurred by SunCoke and were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019. The remaining transaction costs were incurred by the Partnership, resulting in $4.9 million of expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. Subsequent to the closing of the Simplification Transaction, SunCoke incurred $0.3 million of legal and consulting costs, which were included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.    
The following table summarizes the effects of the changes in the Company's ownership interest in the Partnership on SunCoke's equity:equity in 2019. There were no changes in SunCoke's ownership interest in consolidated subsidiaries in 2020 or 2021.
Years Ended December 31,
2019
Net loss attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$(152.3)
Increase in SunCoke Energy, Inc. equity for the purchase of additional interest in the Partnership182.5 
Changes from net loss attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc. and transfers to noncontrolling interest$30.2 



59
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc$26.2
 $122.4
Decrease in SunCoke Energy, Inc. equity for the purchase of additional interest in the Partnership(1.2) (12.0)
Changes from net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc and transfers to noncontrolling interest$25.0
 $110.4
Table of Contents
4. Customer Concentrations
In 2018,2021, the Company sold approximately 43.8 million tons of coke under long-term, take-or-pay contracts to its threetwo primary customers in the U.S.: AKCleveland-Cliffs Steel Holding Corporation ("AK Steel"), ArcelorMittal USAand Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC, and/or its affiliates (“AM USA”)subsidiaries of Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and collectively referred to as "Cliffs Steel," and United States Steel Corporation ("U.S. Steel"). In addition, licensing and operating fees are payable to the Company under long-term contracts with ArcelorMittal Brazil.
The tabletables below showsshow sales to the Company's significant customers:
  Years ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
  Sales and other operating revenue Percent of Company sales and other operating revenue Sales and other operating revenue Percent of Company sales and other operating revenue Sales and other operating revenue Percent of Company sales and other operating revenue
  (Dollars in millions)
AM USA and ArcelorMittal Brazil(1)
 $735.8
 50.7% $678.2
 50.9% $596.6
 48.8%
AK Steel(2)
 $377.9
 26.0% $331.3
 24.9% $350.0
 28.6%
U.S. Steel(3)
 $206.8
 14.3% $214.1
 16.1% $185.3
 15.1%
Year Ended December 31,
2021
Sales and other operating revenuePercent of Company sales and other operating revenue
(Dollars in millions)
Cliffs Steel(1)(3)
$994.6 68.3 %
U.S. Steel(2)
$210.0 14.4 %
(1) Represents revenues included in our Domestic Coke and Brazil Coke segments.
Years Ended December 31,
20202019
Sales and other operating revenuePercent of Company sales and other operating revenueSales and other operating revenuePercent of Company sales and other operating revenue
(Dollars in millions)
Cliffs Steel / AM USA(1)(3)
$687.3 51.6 %$786.4 49.1 %
Cliffs Steel / AK Steel(1)(3)
$355.8 26.7 %$433.3 27.1 %
U.S. Steel(2)
$208.2 15.6 %$255.4 16.0 %
(2) (1)Represents revenues included in our Domestic Coke segment.
(3) (2)Represents revenues included in our Domestic Coke and Logistics segments.
(3)In March 2020, Cliffs completed the acquisition of AK Steel Holding Corporation ("AK Steel"), and subsequently changed the name of AK Steel to Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Holding Corporation. In December 2020, Cliffs completed the acquisition of ArcelorMittal USA LLC ("AM USA"), and subsequently changed the name of AM USA to Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC. As stated above, subsequent to the acquisitions we collectively refer to these subsidiaries as Cliffs Steel.
The Company generally does not require any collateral with respect to its receivables. At both December 31, 20182021, the Company's receivables balance was primarily due from Cliffs Steel, US Steel, and 2017,ArcelorMittal Brazil with receivables due of $30.0 million, $7.3 million and $7.6 million respectively. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s receivables balances werebalance was primarily due from AM USA and ArcelorMittal Brazil, AKCliffs Steel and U.S. Steel.Steel, with receivables due of $22.9 million and $6.3 million, respectively. As a result, the Company experiences concentrations of credit risk in its receivables with these three customers. These concentrations of credit risk may be affected by changes in economic or other conditions affecting the steel industry.


73
Table of Contents


The table below shows receivables due from the Company's significant customers:
 December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
AM USA and ArcelorMittal Brazil$34.3
 $25.7
AK Steel$25.3
 $13.2
U.S. Steel$5.2
 $5.6
Our logistics business provides coal handling and storage services to Murray Energy Corporation, Inc. ("Murray") and Foresight Energy LLC ("Foresight"), who are the two primary customers in the Logistics segment.
The table below shows sales to Murray and Foresight:
  Years ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
  (Dollars in millions)
Sales and other operating revenue $62.5
 $57.8
 $53.5
Percent of Company sales and other operating revenue 4.3% 4.3% 4.4%
Percent of Logistics segment sales and other operating revenue, including intersegment sales 49.3% 49.4% 49.6%
The table below shows receivables due from Murray and Foresight:
 December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Murray and Foresight$3.2
 $9.7


74
Table of Contents


5. Income Taxes
The components of income (loss) before income tax (benefit) expense and loss from equity method investment(benefit) are as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Domestic$50.4 $6.1 $(218.6)
Foreign16.7 13.0 15.5 
Total$67.1 $19.1 $(203.1)


60
Table of Contents
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Domestic$39.3
 $4.3
 $52.5
Foreign17.7
 17.6
 15.6
Total$57.0
 $21.9
 $68.1
Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Current tax expense (benefit):
U.S. federal$0.8 $(4.7)$0.3 
State3.7 (0.3)3.8 
Foreign4.5 3.2 4.3 
Total current tax expense (benefit)9.0 (1.8)8.4 
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
U.S. federal11.0 3.6 (39.3)
State(1.7)8.5 (23.8)
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)9.3 12.1 (63.1)
Total$18.3 $10.3 $(54.7)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Current tax expense:
 
 
U.S. federal$1.4
 $1.7
 $2.7
State2.1
 (1.0) (2.2)
Foreign4.5
 4.9
 5.0
Total current tax expense8.0
 5.6
 5.5
      
Deferred tax expense:
 
 
U.S. federal(3.1) (99.7) (1.5)
State(0.3) 12.5
 4.6
Total deferred tax (benefit) expense(3.4) (87.2) 3.1
Total$4.6
 $(81.6) $8.6



75
Table of Contents



The reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) at the U.S. statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate$14.1 21.0 %$4.0 21.0 %$(42.7)21.0 %
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests in partnerships(1)
(1.1)(1.7)%(1.1)(5.6)%(0.6)0.3 %
State and other income taxes, net of federal income tax effects(2)
1.6 2.4 %7.8 41.2 %(15.0)7.4 %
Impact of CARES Act(3)
— — %(1.5)(7.9)%— — %
Logistics goodwill impairment— — %— — %3.3 (1.7)%
Non-deductible equity compensation3.4 4.9 %1.0 5.5 %2.3 (1.2)%
Return to provision adjustments(0.1)(0.1)%1.2 6.5 %(0.8)0.4 %
Change in valuation allowance0.5 0.8 %(1.3)(6.9)%0.6 (0.3)%
Other(0.1)(0.1)%0.2 0.5 %(1.8)1.0 %
Income tax expense (benefit) at effective tax rate$18.3 27.2 %$10.3 54.3 %$(54.7)26.9 %
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense at U.S. statutory rate$12.0
 21.0 % $7.7
 35.0 % $23.8
 35.0 %
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:           
Impact of Final Regulations(1)
(1.4) (2.5)% 64.2
 293.2 % —
 — %
Impact of Tax Legislation(2)
(4.8) (8.4)% (154.7) (706.4)% —
 — %
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests in partnerships(3)
(3.9) (6.8)% (5.4) (24.7)% (15.6) (23.0)%
State and other income taxes, net of federal income tax effects1.6
 2.8 % 2.0
 9.1 % 1.1
 1.7 %
Change in valuation allowance(4)
0.7
 1.2 % 3.9
 17.8 % 0.4
 0.6 %
Other0.4
 0.7 % 0.7
 3.2 % (1.1) (1.6)%
Income tax (benefit) expense at effective tax rate$4.6
 8.0 % $(81.6) (372.8)% $8.6
 12.7 %
(1)In January 2017, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") announced its decision to exclude cokemaking as a qualifying income generating activity in its final regulations (the "Final Regulations") issued under section 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code relating to the qualifying income exception for publicly traded partnerships. Subsequent to the 10-year transition period, certain cokemaking entities in the Partnership will become taxable as corporations. As a result, the Partnership recorded deferred income tax expense of $148.6 million to set up its initial deferred income tax liability during 2017, primarily related to differences in the book and tax basis of fixed assets, which are expected to exist at the end of the 10-year transition period when the cokemaking operations become taxable.  However, the Company had previously recorded $84.4 million of the deferred income tax liability in its financial statements related to the Company's share of the deferred tax liability for the book and tax differences in its investment in the Partnership. As such, the Company's 2017 financial statements reflect the $64.2 million incremental impact from the Final Regulations solely attributable to the Partnership’s public unitholders, which was also recorded as an equal reduction to noncontrolling interest.

In 2018,(1)No income tax expense is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for income attributable to noncontrolling interests in our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility or the Partnership recordedprior to the Simplification Transaction discussed in Note 3.
(2)Changes in state tax laws during 2021 resulted in a deferredstate tax benefit of $3.6$1.3 million, relatedwhich partially offsets the state tax expense. Additionally, a change in the tax filing status of our Convent Marine Terminal in Louisiana from a taxable partnership to its changesa member of the consolidated return group resulted in projectedlower apportioned state tax rates and the revaluation of certain deferred tax liability associated with projected bookassets, which resulted in $6.5 million of deferred income tax expense in 2020.
(3)On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and tax differences at the endEconomic Security ("CARES Act") was enacted. The enactment of the 10-year transition period dueCARES Act allows the Company to current period additions and changescarry back net operating losses generated in estimated useful lives2019 to each of certain assets. The Company's 2018 financial statements reflect a $1.4 million benefit, which is solely attributable to the Partnership’s public unitholders and was also recorded as an equal reduction to noncontrolling interest. 

five years preceding 2019. As a result of the Final Regulations have no impact to net income attributable to the Company.CARES Act, SunCoke recorded a tax benefit of $1.5 million during 2020.
(2)On December 22, 2017, the Tax Legislation was enacted. The Tax Legislation significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure, including lowering corporate income tax rates. In addition, the SEC staff released Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 on December 23, 2017, which provided for companies to record a provisional impact of the Tax Legislation during a measurement period, not to exceed one year, in situations where companies do not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting under ASC 740, "Income Taxes", for certain income tax effects of the Tax Legislation for the reporting period which includes enactment. During 2017, SunCoke recorded a provisional net income tax benefit of $154.7 million, of which $125.0 million was attributable to the Company, for the impact of this Tax Legislation. These benefits were primarily due to the $169.0 million net benefit resulting from the remeasurement of U.S. deferred income tax liabilities and assets at the lower enacted corporate tax rates. During 2017, based on information available at the time, the Company recorded provisional income tax expense of $14.3 million for a valuation allowance against $19.0 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards that the Company believed would not be realized prior to their expiration as a result of the Tax Legislation. Based on an updated analysis of the foreign tax credit rules relating to the new Tax Legislation, the Company revised its estimate of the realizability of its foreign tax credits, resulting in a net $4.8 million benefit during the third quarter of 2018. There were no other significant changes to previous estimates and amounts recorded in 2017 relating to this Tax Legislation.



61
76
Table of Contents


(3)Excludes the impact of the Final Regulations on qualifying income discussed above. No income tax expense is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income for income attributable to noncontrolling interests in partnership entities.
(4)In 2017, the Company recorded a valuation allowance as a result of changes in future state allocation assumptions.
The tax effects of temporary differences that comprise the net deferred income tax liability from operations are as follows:
 December 31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Retirement benefit liabilities$5.5 $6.3 
Black lung benefit liabilities14.4 14.8 
Share-based compensation2.6 4.2 
Federal tax credit carryforward(1)
17.6 19.9 
Foreign tax credit carryforward(2)
12.3 19.4 
Federal net operating loss(3)
— 5.3 
State tax credit carryforward, net of federal income tax effects— 0.3 
State net operating loss carryforward, net of federal income tax effects(4)
12.6 12.9 
Other liabilities not yet deductible10.4 11.5 
Total deferred tax assets75.4 94.6 
Less: valuation allowance(5)
(20.2)(19.6)
Deferred tax asset, net55.2 75.0 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Properties, plants and equipment(151.0)(152.9)
Investment in partnerships(73.2)(81.4)
Total deferred tax liabilities(224.2)(234.3)
Net deferred tax liability$(169.0)$(159.3)
 December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Deferred tax assets: 
Retirement benefit liabilities$6.4
 $7.1
Black lung benefit liabilities11.3
 11.6
Share-based compensation6.4
 6.1
Federal tax credit carryforward(1)
21.5
 23.2
Foreign tax credit carryforward(2)
15.9
 19.0
Federal net operating loss—
 2.5
Section 163(j) interest limitation carryforward(3)
1.8
 —
State tax credit carryforward, net of federal income tax effects(4)
2.4
 4.0
State net operating loss carryforward, net of federal income tax effects(5)
13.5
 13.9
Other liabilities not yet deductible4.9
 4.3
Total deferred tax assets84.1
 91.7
Less valuation allowance(6)
(20.7) (26.2)
Deferred tax asset, net63.4
 65.5
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
Properties, plants and equipment(111.5) (114.9)
Investment in partnerships(206.6) (208.4)
Total deferred tax liabilities(318.1) (323.3)
Net deferred tax liability$(254.7) $(257.8)
(1)Federal tax credit carryforward expires in 2032 through 2034.
(1)Federal tax credit carryforward expires in 2032 through 2034.
(2)Foreign tax credit carryforward expires in 2023 through 2028.
(3)The Tax Legislation generally limits the deductibility of business interest expense to 30 percent of adjusted taxable income. This limitation resulted in a deferred tax asset as it is eligible for deduction in future taxable years and has no expiration.
(4)State tax credit carryforward, net of federal income tax effects expires in 2019 through 2023.
(5)State net operating loss carryforward, net of federal income tax effects expires in 2023 through 2038.
(6)Primarily related to state tax credit and net operating loss carryforwards and the $9.9 million allowance against the foreign tax credit carryforward.
(2)Foreign tax credit carryforward expires in 2024 through 2031.
(3)Federal net operating loss does not expire.
(4)State net operating loss carryforward, net of federal income tax effects expires in 2032 through 2040.
(5)Primarily related to net operating loss carryforwards and an $11.3 million allowance against the foreign tax credit carryforward.
The Company's consolidated federal income tax returns have been examined by the IRS for all years through the year ended December 31, 2014. SunCoke is currently open to examination by the IRS for tax years ended December 31, 2015 and forward.
State and foreign income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years after the filing of the respective returns. The state impact of any amended federal returns remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification of such amendments to the states.


77
Table of Contents


There were no uncertain tax positions at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and there were no associated interest or penalties recognized for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 or 2016.2019. The Company does not expect that any unrecognized tax benefits pertaining to income tax matters will be required in the next twelve months.

62
Table of Contents
6. Inventories
The Company’s inventory consists of metallurgical coal, which is the principal raw material for the Company’s cokemaking operations, coke, which is the finished good sold by the Company to its customers, and materials, supplies and other. These components of inventories were as follows:
 December 31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Coal$63.5 $60.6 
Coke16.6 21.1 
Materials, supplies and other46.9 44.9 
Total inventories$127.0 $126.6 

 December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Coal$59.9
 $61.4
Coke8.6
 12.3
Materials, supplies and other41.9
 37.3
Total inventories$110.4
 $111.0
7. Properties, Plants, and Equipment Net
The components of net properties, plants and equipment were as follows:
 December  31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Coke and energy plant, machinery and equipment$2,077.3 $2,009.3 
Logistics plant, machinery and equipment170.7 157.3 
Land and land improvements105.5 104.5 
Construction-in-progress50.8 47.4 
Other43.7 42.4 
Gross investment, at cost2,448.0 2,360.9 
Less: accumulated depreciation(1,160.1)(1,032.9)
Total properties, plants and equipment, net$1,287.9 $1,328.0 
 December  31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Coke and energy plant, machinery and equipment(1)
$1,876.3
 $1,812.0
Logistics plant, machinery and equipment218.3
 216.2
Land and land improvements119.7
 118.7
Construction-in-progress72.7
 51.9
Other39.9
 35.7
Gross investment, at cost2,326.9
 2,234.5
Less: accumulated depreciation(1)
(855.8) (733.2)
Total properties, plants and equipment, net$1,471.1
 $1,501.3

(1)
Includes assets, consisting mainly of coke and energy plant, machinery and equipment, with a gross investment totaling $1,416.2 million and $1,337.3 million and accumulated depreciation of $554.1 million and $475.8 million at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which are subject to long-term contracts to sell coke and are deemed to contain operating leases. Upon adoption of ASC 842, "Leases",in 2019, these contracts will no longer be deemed to contain operating leases.
8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
GoodwillIntangible assets, net, include goodwill allocated to SunCoke's reportable segments is shown below.our Domestic Coke segment of $3.4 million at both December 31, 2021 and 2020, and other intangibles detailed in the table below, excluding fully amortized intangible assets. There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020, respectively.
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Weighted - Average Remaining Amortization YearsGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNetGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet
(Dollars in millions)
Customer relationships36.7 5.0 1.7 6.7 4.5 2.2 
Permits2131.7 3.1 28.6 31.7 1.7 30.0 
Other291.6 0.1 1.5 1.6 — 1.6 
Total$40.0 $8.2 $31.8 $40.0 $6.2 $33.8 
 December 31, 2018 and 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Domestic Coke$3.4
Logistics73.5
Total$76.9
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2018, with no indication of impairment. The fair value of the Logistics reporting unit, which was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis, exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit by approximately 30 percent. A significant portion of our logistics business holds long-term, take-or-pay contracts with Murray and Foresight. Key assumptions in our goodwill impairment test include


78
Table of Contents


continued customer performance against long-term, take-or-pay contracts, renewal of future long-term, take-or-pay contracts, incremental merchant business and a 14 percent discount rate representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital for this business line. The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments, such as the estimated future cash flows of Logistics and the discount rate used to discount such cash flows, could significantly impact the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, and therefore, impact the excess fair value above carrying value of the reporting unit. A 100 basis point change in the discount rate would not have reduced the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value.
The following table summarizes the components of gross and net intangible asset balances:
   December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Weighted - Average Remaining Amortization Years Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net
   (Dollars in millions)
Customer contracts4 $31.7
 $17.7
 $14.0
 $31.7
 $13.8
 $17.9
Customer relationships13 28.7
 7.5
 21.2
 28.7
 5.7
 23.0
Permits24 139.0
 17.4
 121.6
 139.0
 12.2
 126.8
Trade name— 1.2
 1.2
 —
 1.2
 1.0
 0.2
Total  $200.6
 $43.8
 $156.8
 $200.6
 $32.7
 $167.9
The permits above represent the environmental and operational permits required to operate a coal export terminal in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and other regulatory bodies. Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives in a manner that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefit of the asset is consumed. The permits’ useful lives were estimated to be 27 years at acquisition based on the expected useful life of the significant operating equipment at the facility. We have historical experience of renewing and extending similar arrangements at our other facilities and intend to continue to renew our permits as they come up for renewal for the foreseeable future. The
63
Table of Contents
permits were renewed regularly prior to our acquisition of CMT. These permits have an average remaining renewal term of approximately 2.43.2 years.
Total amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $11.1$2.0 million, $11.1$2.5 million and $11.2$8.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Based on the carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2018,2021, we estimate amortization expense for each of the next five years as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
2022$2.0 
20232.0 
20241.9 
20251.5 
20261.5 
Thereafter22.9 
Total$31.8 
2019 Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
 (Dollars in millions)
2019$10.9
202010.7
202110.3
202210.3
20237.0
Thereafter107.6
Total$156.8
Prior to 2020, a significant portion of our logistics business was from long-term, take-or-pay contracts with Murray American Coal, Inc. ("Murray") and Foresight Energy LLC ("Foresight"), which were adversely impacted by declining coal export prices and domestic demand in 2019. Murray filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 29, 2019. Foresight engaged outside counsel and financial advisors to assess restructuring options during 2019 and subsequently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 10, 2020. Both Murray and Foresight's contracts with CMT were subsequently rejected by the bankruptcy courts.

The Company concluded the impact of the events discussed above could more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Logistics reporting unit below its carrying value, requiring SunCoke to perform its annual goodwill test as of September 30, 2019. The fair value of the Logistics reporting unit, which was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis, did not exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit. Key assumptions in our goodwill impairment test included reduced forecasted volumes and reduced rates from Foresight, no further business from Murray, incremental merchant business and a discount rate of 12 percent, representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital for this business line. As a result, the Company recorded a $73.5 million non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge to the Logistics segment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations during 2019, which represented a full impairment of the Logistics goodwill balance.

As a result of our logistics customers' events, CMT's long-lived assets, including customer contracts, customer relationships, permits and properties, plant and equipment, were also assessed for impairment as of September 30, 2019. The Company re-evaluated its projections for throughput volumes, pricing and customer performance against the existing long-term, take-or-pay contracts. The resulting undiscounted cash flows were lower than the carrying value of the asset group. Therefore, the Company assessed the fair value of the asset group to measure the amount of impairment. The fair value of the CMT long-lived assets was determined to be $112.1 million based on discounted cash flows, asset replacement cost and adjustments for capacity utilization, which are considered Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy as defined in Note 18. Key assumptions in our discounted cash flows included reduced forecasted volumes and reduced rates from Foresight, no further business from Murray, incremental merchant business and a discount rate of 11 percent, representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital for this asset group. As a result, during 2019, the Company recorded a total non-cash, pre-tax long-lived asset impairment charge of $173.9 million included in long-lived asset and goodwill impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, all of which was attributable to the Logistics segment. The charge included an impairment of CMT's long-lived intangible assets of $113.3 million and of CMT's property, plant and equipment of $60.6 million.
79
Table of Contents


9. Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company has asset retirement obligations, primarily in the Domestic Coke segment, related to certain contractual obligations. These contractual obligations mostly relatedrelate to costs associated with restoring land to its original state, and may require the retirement and removal of long-lived assets from certain cokemaking properties as well as other reclamation obligations related to our former coal mining business. The Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state statutes require that mine property be restored in accordance with specified standards and an approved reclamation plan. We do not have any unrecorded asset retirement obligations.
64
Table of Contents
The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in the asset retirement obligation from operations during each period:
Years ended December 31,
20212020
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of year$11.4 $15.3 
Liabilities settled(0.1)(0.1)
Accretion expense(1)
0.9 1.1 
Revisions in estimated cash flows(2)
0.1 (4.9)
Asset retirement obligation at end of year(3)
$12.3 $11.4 
 (Dollars in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2016$13.9
Liabilities settled(0.7)
Accretion expense(1)
1.0
Revisions in estimated cash flows(0.2)
Balance at December 31, 2017$14.0
Liabilities settled(0.4)
Accretion expense(1)
0.9
Revisions in estimated cash flows$0.1
Balance at December 31, 2018$14.6
(1)Included in cost of products sold and operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(1)Included in cost of products sold and operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2)Revisions of estimated cash flows in 2020 were primarily due to the identification of more cost efficient demolition methods as well as the timing of projected spending on certain obligations.
(3)The current portion of asset retirement obligation liabilities, which totaled $0.7 million and zero at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, is classified in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
10. Retirement Benefits Plans
Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Plans
The Company has plans which provide health care and life insurance benefits for many of its retirees (“postretirement benefit plans”). The postretirement benefit plans are unfunded and the costs are borne by the Company. Effective January 1, 2011, postretirement medical benefits for future retirees were phased out or eliminated for non-mining employees with less than ten years of service.
Postretirement benefit plans expense consisted of the following components:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Interest cost on benefit obligations$0.5 $0.7 $1.1 
Amortization of:
Actuarial losses0.8 0.7 0.6 
Prior service benefit(0.4)(0.5)(0.6)
Total expense$0.9 $0.9 $1.1 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Interest cost on benefit obligations$1.0
 $1.1
 $1.3
Amortization of:     
Actuarial losses0.6
 0.9
 0.7
Prior service benefit(0.7) (0.7) (0.7)
Total expense$0.9
 $1.3
 $1.3
Postretirement benefit plans expense is determined using actuarial assumptions as of the beginning of the year or using weighted-average assumptions when curtailments, settlements and/or other events require a plan remeasurement. The following assumptions were used to determine postretirement benefit plans expense:
 December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Discount Rate3.35% 3.65% 3.80%

 December 31,
 202120202019
Discount rate2.00 %2.90 %4.00 %

65
80
Table of Contents


The following amounts were recognized as components of other comprehensive income (loss) before related tax impacts:
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Reclassifications to earnings of:
Actuarial loss amortization$0.8 $0.7 $0.6 
Prior service benefit amortization(0.4)(0.5)(0.6)
Retirement benefit plan funded status
   adjustments:
Actuarial gains (losses)1.3 (2.0)(1.0)
$1.7 $(1.8)$(1.0)
  Years Ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Reclassifications to earnings of: 
Actuarial loss amortization $0.6
 $0.9
 $0.7
Prior service benefit amortization (0.7) (0.7) (0.7)
Retirement benefit plan funded status
   adjustments:
      
Actuarial gains (losses) 0.8
 (1.1) (1.8)
Prior service benefit(1)
 —
 —
 1.5
  $0.7
 $(0.9) $(0.3)
(1) Effective January 1, 2017, a plan change occurred resulting in Medicare-eligible disabled participants transitioning from a Company-sponsored group medical plan to a federal health care exchange plan. The Company provides a subsidy to these participants each year. The plan change resulted in a decrease in the benefit obligation of $1.5 million during 2016.
The following table sets forth the components of the changes in benefit obligations:
 Years Ended December 31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$27.5 $27.4 
Interest cost0.5 0.7 
Actuarial (gains) losses(1.3)2.0 
Benefits paid(2.3)(2.6)
Benefit obligation at end of year(1)
$24.4 $27.5 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$31.3
 $32.3
Interest cost1.0
 1.1
Actuarial (gain)/loss(0.8) 1.1
Benefits paid(3.3) (3.2)
Benefit obligation at end of year(1)
$28.2
 $31.3
(1) Represents retirement benefit liabilities, including current portion, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The current portion of retirement benefit liabilities, which totaled $3.0$2.6 million and $3.1$2.8 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, is classified in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


81
Table of Contents


The following table sets forth the cumulative amounts not yet recognized in net income:
income (loss):
 Years Ended December 31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Cumulative amounts not yet recognized in net income (loss):
Actuarial losses$10.0 $12.1 
Prior service benefits(1.1)(1.5)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (before related tax benefit)$8.9 $10.6 
  Years Ended December 31,
  2018 2017
  (Dollars in millions)
Cumulative amounts not yet recognized in net income:    
Actuarial losses $10.4
 $11.8
Prior service benefits (2.6) (3.4)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (before related tax benefit) $7.8
 $8.4

The expected benefit payments through 20282031 for the postretirement benefit plan are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Year ending December 31:
2022$2.6 
2023$2.4 
2024$2.3 
2025$2.1 
2026$1.9 
2027 through 2031$7.6 

66
Table of Contents
Year ending December 31: (Dollars in millions)
2019 $3.0
2020 2.9
2021 2.8
2022 2.6
2023 2.4
2024 through 2028 9.5
The measurement date for the Company’s postretirement benefit plans is December 31. The following discount rates were used to determine the benefit obligation:
  December 31,
  2018 2017
Discount rate 4.00% 3.35%
 December 31,
 20212020
Discount rate2.50 %2.00 %
The health care cost trend assumption used at both December 31, 2018,2021 and 20172020 to compute the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the postretirement benefit plans was 6.506.25 percent, which is assumed to decline gradually to 5.00 percent in 20282026 and to remain at that level thereafter.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company has defined contribution plans which provide retirement benefits for certain of its employees. The Company’s contributions, which are principally based on the Company’s pretax income and the aggregate compensation levels of participating employees and are charged against income as incurred, amounted to $6.5$6.9 million, $6.4$6.6 million and $5.6$6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.


82
Table of Contents


11. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of following:
 December 31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Accrued benefits$21.7 $18.3 
Current portion of postretirement benefit obligation2.6 2.8 
Other taxes payable9.2 9.8 
Current portion of black lung liability5.4 4.6 
Accrued legal4.5 6.4 
Other9.6 7.9 
Total accrued liabilities$53.0 $49.8 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Accrued benefits$21.2
 $21.3
Current portion of postretirement benefit obligation3.0
 3.1
Other taxes payable9.1
 10.5
Current portion of black lung liability4.5
 5.4
Accrued legal4.2
 5.6
Other3.6
 7.3
Total accrued liabilities$45.6
 $53.2
12. Debt and Financing ObligationObligations
Total debt and financing obligationobligations consisted of the following:
 December 31,
 20212020
 (Dollars in millions)
4.875 percent senior notes, due 2029 ("2029 Senior Notes")$500.0 $— 
7.500 percent senior notes, due 2025 ("2025 Senior Notes")— 587.3 
$350.0 revolving credit facility, due 2026 ("Revolving Facility")115.0 88.3 
5.346 percent financing obligation, due 202412.0 14.9 
Total borrowings$627.0 $690.5 
Original issue discount— (3.3)
Debt issuance costs(13.4)(10.3)
Total debt and financing obligation$613.6 $676.9 
Less: current portion of long-term debt and financing obligation3.2 3.0 
Total long-term debt and financing obligation$610.4 $673.9 
Issuance of 2029 Senior Notes
On June 22, 2021, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes with an interest rate of 4.875 percent due in June 2029. The Company received proceeds of $500.0 million from the issuance and incurred debt issuance costs related to this transaction of $10.4 million, which are included in long-term debt and financing obligation, net of amortization, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. The 2029 Senior Notes are the senior secured obligations of the Company. Interest on the 2029 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on
67
Table of Contents
 December 31,
 2018
2017
 (Dollars in millions)
7.500 percent senior notes, due 2025 ("Partnership Notes")$700.0
 $700.0
7.625 percent senior notes, due 2019 ("2019 Notes")—
 44.6
Term loan, due 2022 ("Term Loan")43.9
 —
SunCoke's revolving credit facility, due 2022 ("Revolving Facility")—
 —
Partnership's revolving credit facility, due 2022 ("Partnership Revolver")105.0
 130.0
5.82 percent financing obligation, due 2021 ("Partnership Financing Obligation")10.1
 12.7
Total borrowings$859.0
 $887.3
Original issue discount(5.4) (5.9)
Debt issuance costs(15.2) (17.7)
Total debt and financing obligation$838.4
 $863.7
Less: current portion of long-term debt and financing obligation3.9
 2.6
Total long-term debt and financing obligation$834.5
 $861.1
June 30 and December 30 of each year, commencing on December 30, 2021. The Company may redeem some or all of the 2029 Senior Notes at its option, in whole or part, at the dates and amounts set forth in the applicable indenture.
The applicable indenture for the 2029 Senior Notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Company's ability and, in certain circumstances, the ability of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries to (i) borrow money, (ii) create liens on assets, (iii) pay dividends or make other distributions on or repurchase or redeem the Company's capital stock, (iv) prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt, (v) make loans and investments, (vi) sell assets, (vii) incur liens, (viii) enter into transactions with affiliates, (ix) enter into agreements restricting the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends and (x) consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of the Company's assets.
Purchase and Redemption of 20192025 Senior Notes
On January 11, 2018,During the Companysecond quarter of 2021, pursuant to the applicable indenture with The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation as trustee ("Trustee"), the Trustee delivered redemption notices to holders of the 2025 Senior Notes, which were the senior unsecured obligations of Finance Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes redeemed was $587.3 million, which represented all of itsthe outstanding 2019principal of the 2025 Senior Notes at 100 percent. On June 22, 2021, the proceeds required for $46.1redemption, including the applicable premium and accrued interest totaling $612.1 million, were irrevocably deposited with the Trustee, at which included accruedtime the 2025 Senior Notes were fully satisfied and unpaid interestdischarged, and held by the Trustee until the date of $1.5 million.redemption, July 8, 2021. As a result, ofduring the debt extinguishment,year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt on the Consolidated StatementsStatement of IncomeOperations of $0.3$31.1 million, representing awhich consisted of the premium paid of $22.0 million and the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. The Company funded the redemption with a Term Loan in aggregate principal amount of $45.0 million, resulting in additional debt issuance costs of $0.3 million. The Term Loan will mature on May 24, 2022. Borrowings under the Term Loan will bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (i) a base rate plus an applicable margin or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement.
Partnership Notes
The Partnership Notes are the senior unsecured obligations of the Partnership, and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Partnership’s existing and certain future subsidiaries. Interest on the Partnership Notes is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
The Partnership may redeem some or all of the Partnership Notes at any time on or after June 15, 2020 at specified redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. Before June 15, 2020, and following certain equity offerings, the Partnership also may redeem up to 35 percent of the Partnership Notes at a price equal to 107.5 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, at any time


83
Table of Contents


prior to June 15, 2020, the Partnership may redeem some or all of the Partnership Notes at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium.
The Partnership is obligated to offer to purchase all or a portion of the Partnership Notes at a price of (a) 101 percent of their principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase, upon the occurrence of certain change of control events and (b) 100 percent of their principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase, upon the occurrence of certain asset dispositions. These restrictions and prohibitions are subject to certain qualifications and exceptions set forth in the Indenture, including without limitation, reinvestment rights with respect to the proceeds of asset dispositions.
The Partnership Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit the Partnership’s ability$6.1 million and the abilityremaining original issue discount of certain of the Partnership’s subsidiaries to (i) incur indebtedness, (ii) pay dividends or make other distributions, (ii) prepay, redeem or repurchase certain subordinated debt, (iv) make loans and investments, (v) sell assets, (vi) incur liens, (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates, (viii) enter into agreements restricting the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends and (ix) consolidate or merge.
Partnership Financing Obligation
The Partnership's sale-leaseback arrangement of certain coke and logistics equipment has an initial lease period of 60 months and an early buyout option after 48 months to purchase the equipment at 34.5 percent of the original lease equipment cost. The arrangement is accounted for as a financing transaction, resulting in a financing obligation on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The financing obligation is guaranteed by the Partnership.$3.0 million.
Revolving Facility
The proceeds of any borrowings made under the Revolving Facility can be used to finance working capital needs, acquisitions, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. The obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and secured by liens on substantially all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ assets pursuant to a guarantee and collateral agreement.
The capacityOn June 22, 2021, in conjunction with the issuance of the 2029 Senior Notes, the Company amended and extended the maturity of its Revolving facility is $100.0 million. Facility from August 2024 to June 2026 and reduced its capacity by $50.0 million to $350.0 million, resulting in additional debt issuance costs of $1.6 million, which are included in long-term debt and financing obligation, net of amortization, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. Additionally, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt on the Consolidated Statement of Operations of $0.8 million, representing the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Revolving Facility had letters of credit outstanding of $23.9$6.2 million and no$115.0 million outstanding balance, leaving $76.1$228.8 million available. Additionally, the Company has certain letters of credit totaling $17.4 million, which do not reduce the Revolving Facility's available balance. Commitment fees are based on the unused portion of the Revolving Facility at a rate of 0.40.25 percent.
Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest, at SunCoke Energy’sSunCoke’s option, at either (i) a rate per annum equal to either the adjusted Eurodollar Rate, which currently is the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.0 percent or (ii) an alternate base rate (“ABR”) plus an applicable margin or (ii) LIBOR plus 175 basis points.1.0 percent. The spread is subject to change based on the Company'sSunCoke's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement. The weighted-average interest rate for borrowings outstanding under the Credit AgreementRevolving Facility was 2.82.1 percent during 2016. There were no borrowings during 2018 or 2017.2021.
Partnership RevolverFinancing Obligation
The proceedsCompany has a sale-leaseback arrangement related to certain coke and logistics equipment. The arrangement has an initial period of any borrowings made under the Partnership Revolver can be used to finance working capital needs, acquisitions, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. The Partnership Revolver provides total aggregate commitments from lenders of $285.0 million and up to $200.0 million uncommitted incremental revolving capacity. The obligations under the Partnership Revolver are guaranteed by the Partnership’s subsidiaries and secured by liens on substantially all of the Partnership’s and the guarantors’ assets.
As of48 months beginning December 31, 2018, the Partnership had $1.9 million of letters of credit outstanding2020, and an outstanding balance of $105.0 million, leaving $178.1 million available. Commitment fees are basedearly buyout option after 36 months to purchase the equipment at a fixed rate. The arrangement is accounted for as a financing transaction, resulting in a financing obligation on the unused portionConsolidated Balance Sheets.

68
Table of the Partnership Revolver at a rate of 0.4 percent.Contents
Borrowings under the Partnership Revolver bear interest at either (i) a variable rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points or (ii) an alternative base rate plus 150 basis points. The spread is subject to change based on the Partnership's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement. The weighted-average interest rate for borrowings under the Partnership Revolver was 4.8 percent, 3.8 percent and 3.3 percent during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Covenants
Under the terms of the Revolving Facility, the Company is subject to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.25:4.50:1.00 and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 2.75:2.50:1.00. Under the terms of the Partnership's credit agreement, the Partnership is subject to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 4.5:1.0 prior to June 30, 2020 and 4.0:1.0 after June 30, 2020 and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 2.5:1.0. The Company and Partnership's credit agreementCompany's debt agreements contains other covenants and events of default that are customary for similar agreements and may limit our ability to take various actions including our ability to pay a dividend or repurchase our stock.


84
Table of Contents


If we fail to perform our obligations under these and other covenants, the lenders' credit commitment could be terminated and any outstanding borrowings, together with accrued interest, under the Revolving Facility and Partnership Revolver could be declared immediately due and payable. The Company and the Partnership havehas a cross default provision that applies to our indebtedness having a principal amount in excess of $35 million.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company and the Partnership werewas in compliance with all debt covenants. We do not anticipate violation of these covenants nor do we anticipate that any of these covenants will restrict our operations or our ability to obtain additional financing.
Maturities
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the combined aggregate amount of maturities for long-term borrowings for each of the next five years is as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
2022$3.2 
20233.3 
20245.5 
2025— 
2026115.0 
2027-Thereafter500.0 
Total$627.0 

 (Dollars in millions)
2019$3.9
2020(1)
10.7
20213.4
2022141.0
2023—
2024-Thereafter700.0
Total$859.0
(1)Assumes the Partnership Financing Obligation early buyout option is exercised in 2020.
13. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Lease obligations
The Company, as lessee, has noncancelable operating leases for land, office space, equipment and railcars. The aggregate amount of future minimum annual rental payments applicable to noncancelable operating leases is as follows:
 Minimum
Rental
Payments
 (Dollars in millions)
Year ending December 31: 
2019$2.0
20201.1
20211.0
20220.5
20230.1
2024-Thereafter0.7
Total$5.4
Total rental expense for all operating leases was $9.8 million, $7.3 million and $8.7 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Legal Matters
SunCoke Energy is party to an omnibus agreement, pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnifyBetween 2005 and 2012, the Partnership for costsEPA and expenses related to remediation of certain identified environmental matters in existence prior to the Partnership's initial public offering on January 24, 2013 ("IPO"Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (“OEPA”) at the Partnership’s Haverhill and Middletown facilities and certain identified environmental matters at the Partnership's Granite City facility in existence prior to its dropdown in January of 2015 ("Granite City Dropdown"). However, under the terms of the omnibus agreement, SunCoke Energy is not obligated to indemnify the Partnership for any new environmental matters coming into existence after the IPO at the Partnership’s Haverhill and Middletown facilities, or any new environmental matters coming into existence after the Granite City Dropdown at the Partnership's Granite City facility.


85
Table of Contents


The EPA issued Notices of Violations (“NOVs”), alleging violations of air emission operating permits for our Haverhill and Granite City cokemaking facilities which stemmed from alleged violations of our air emission operating permits for these facilities. We are workingworked in a cooperative manner with the EPA, the Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOEPA and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to address the allegations and, havein November 2014, entered into a consent decree with these parties in federal district court with these parties.in the Southern District of Illinois. The consent decree includesincluded a $2.2 million civil penalty payment, which was paid in December 2014, as well asand a commitment to undertake capital projects underway to improve the reliability of the energy recovery systems and enhance environmental performance atperformance. The Haverhill project was completed in 2016, but completion of the Haverhill and Granite City facilities. In the third quarter of 2018, the Court enteredproject was delayed to June 2019, with SunCoke agreeing to pay an amendment to the consent decree which provides the Haverhill and Granite City facilities with additional time to perform necessary maintenance on the flue gas desulfurization systems without exceeding consent decree limits. The emissionsimmaterial amount associated with this maintenance will be mitigated in accordance with the amendment,delay.
Between 2010 and there are no civil penalty payments associated with this amendment. The project at Granite City was due to be completed in February 2019, but the Company now expects to complete the project in July 2019 and is in discussions with the government entities regarding, among other things, the timing thereof.
We anticipate spending approximately $150 million related to these projects, of which we have spent approximately $138 million to date, including $7 million spent by the Company prior to the formation of the Partnership. The remaining capital is expected to be spent through the first half of 2019. A portion of the proceeds from the Partnership's initial public offering and subsequent dropdowns were used to fund $119 million of these environmental remediation projects. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, the Company made capital contributions to the Partnership of $20 million during 2018 for these known environmental remediation projects. The Company expects to make additional capital contributions to the Partnership of approximately $5 million in the first half of 2019 for the estimated future spending related to these environmental remediation projects.
2016, SunCoke Energy has also received certain NOVs, Findings of Violations ("FOVs"(“FOVs”), and information requests from the EPA, alleging violations of air operating permit conditions related to our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility, which allege violationsfacility. To reach a settlement of certain air operating permit conditions for this facility. The Clean Air Act (the "CAA") provides the EPAthese NOVs and FOVs, we met regularly with the authority to issue, among other actions, an order to enforce a State Implementation Plan ("SIP") 30 days after an NOV. The CAA also authorizes EPA, enforcement of other non-SIP requirements immediately after an FOV. Generally, an NOV applies to SIPs and requires the EPA to wait 30 days, while an FOV applies to all other provisions (such as federal regulations) of the CAA, and has no waiting period. The NOVs and/or FOVs were received in 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2016. After discussions with the EPA and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) in 2010, resolution of the NOVs/FOVs was postponed by mutual agreement because of ongoing discussions regarding the NOVs at Haverhill and Granite City. In January 2012, the Company began working in a cooperative manner to address the allegations with the EPA, the IDEM and Cokenergy, LLC., an independent power producer that owns and operates an energy facility, including heat recovery equipment and a flue gas desulfurization system, that processes hot flue gas from our Indiana Harbor facility to produce steam and electricity and to reduce the sulfur and particulate content of such flue gas.
The EPA, IDEM, SunCoke Energy and Cokenergy, LLC met regularly since those discussions commenced to reach a settlement of the NOVsproduce steam and FOVs. Capital projects were underway during this time to address items that would be included in conjunction with a settlement.electricity. A consent decree among the parties was entered by the federal district court in the Northern District of Indiana during the fourth quarter of 2018. The settlement includesincluded a $2.5 million civil penalty that was paid in the fourth quarter of 2018. Further, the settlement consists2018, and implementation of certain capital projects, already underwaycompleted during the fourth quarter of 2019, to improve reliability and environmental performance of the coke ovens at the facility.
The Company is a party to certain other pending and threatened claims, including matters related to commercial and tax disputes, product liability, employment claims, personal injury claims, premises-liabilitycommon law tort claims, allegations of exposures to toxic substances and environmental claims. Although the ultimate outcome of these claims cannot be ascertained at this time, it is reasonably possible that some portion of these claims could be resolved unfavorably to the Company. Management of the Company believes that any liability which may arise from these claims would not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. SunCoke's threshold
69
Table of Contents
for disclosing material environmental legal proceedings involving a government authority where potential monetary sanctions are involved is $1 million.
Black Lung Benefit Liabilities
The Company has obligations related to coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, or black lung, benefits to certain of its former coal miners and their dependents. Such benefits are provided for under Title IV of the Federal Coal Mine and Safety Act of 1969 and subsequent amendments, as well as for black lung benefits provided in the states of Virginia, Kentucky and West Virginia pursuant to workers’ compensation legislation. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which was implemented in 2010, amended previous legislation related to coal workers’ black lung obligations. PPACA provides for the automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and changes the legal criteria used to assess and award claims.     
We adjust our liability each year based upon actuarial calculations of our expected future payments for these benefits. Our independent actuarial consultants calculate the present value of the estimated black lung liability annually based on actuarial models utilizing our population of former coal miners, historical payout patterns of both the Company and the industry, actuarial mortality rates, disability incidence, medical costs, death benefits, dependents, discount rates and the current federally mandated payout rates. The estimated liability may be impacted by future changes in the statutory mechanisms, modifications by court decisions and changes in filing patterns driven by perceptions of success by claimants and their advisors, the impact of which cannot be estimated.     


86
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes discount rates utilized, active claims and the total black lung liabilities:
December 31,
20212020
Discount rate(1)
2.4 %2.0 %
Active claims332 309 
Total black lung liability (dollars in millions)(2)
$63.3 $64.6 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Discount rate(1)
4.0% 3.3%
Active claims345
 351
Black lung liability (dollars in millions)(2)
$49.4
 $50.3
(1)The discount rate is determined based on a portfolio of high-quality corporate bonds with maturities that are consistent with the estimated duration of our black lung obligations. A decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate would have increased black lung expense by $1.1$1.4 million in 2018.2021.
(2)The current portion of the black lung liability was $4.5$5.4 million and $5.4$4.6 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and was included in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table summarizes annual black lung payments and expense:
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars in millions)
Payments$4.4 $6.0 $5.2 
Expense (1)
$3.1 $15.4 $10.9 
(1)Expenses incurred in excess of annual accretion of the black lung liability in 2020 and 2019 primarily reflect the impact of changes in discount rates as well as increases in expected future claims as a result of higher refiling and approval rate assumptions.
On February 1, 2013, SunCoke obtained commercial insurance for black lung claims in excess of a deductible for employees with a last date of employment after that date. Also during 2013, we were reauthorized to continue to self-insure black lung liabilities incurred prior to February 1, 2013 by the U.S. Department of Labor's Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation (“DCMWC”) in exchange for $8.4 million of collateral. In July 2019, the DCMWC required that SunCoke, along with a number of other companies, file an application and supporting documentation for reauthorization to self-insure our legacy black lung obligations incurred prior to February 1, 2013. The Company provided the requested information in the fourth quarter of 2019. The DCMWC subsequently notified the Company in a letter dated February 21, 2020 that the Company was reauthorized to self-insure certain of its black lung obligations; however, the reauthorization is contingent upon the Company providing collateral of $40.4 million to secure certain of its black lung obligations. This proposed collateral requirement is a substantial increase from the $8.4 million in collateral that the Company currently provides to secure these self-insured black lung obligations. The reauthorization process provided the Company with the right to appeal the security determination. SunCoke exercised its right to appeal the DCMWC’s security determination and provided
70
Table of Contents
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Payments$6.3
 $7.4
 $7.8
Expense$5.4
 $7.5
 $8.1
additional information supporting the Company’s position in May 2020 and February 2021. If the Company’s appeal is unsuccessful, the Company may be required to provide additional collateral to receive the self-insurance reauthorization from the DCMWC, which could potentially reduce the Company’s liquidity.
14. Leases
The Company leases land, office space, equipment, railcars and locomotives. Arrangements are assessed at inception to determine if a lease exists and, with the adoption of ASC 842, “Leases,” right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Because the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate of return, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at the inception of a lease to calculate the present value of lease payments. Our incremental borrowing rate is determined through market sources for secured borrowings and approximates the interest rate at which we could borrow on a collateralized basis with similar terms and payments in similar economic environments. The Company has elected to apply the short-term lease exception for all asset classes, therefore, excluding all leases with a term of less than 12 months from the balance sheet, and will recognize the lease payments in the period they are incurred. Additionally, the Company elected the practical expedient to account for lease and non-lease components of an arrangement, such as assets and services, as a single lease component for all asset classes on existing leases upon the adoption of ASC 842.
Certain of our long-term leases include one or more options to renew or to terminate, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one month to 50 years. The impact of lease renewals or terminations are included in the expected lease term to the extent the Company is reasonably certain to exercise the renewal or termination. The Company's finance leases are immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.
The components of lease expense were as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2021Year ended December 31, 2020
(Dollars in millions)
Operating leases:
Cost of products sold and operating expenses$1.9 $1.8 
Selling, general and administrative expenses0.5 0.5 
$2.4 $2.3 
Short-term leases:
Cost of products sold and operating expenses(1)(2)
6.0 6.4 
Total lease expense$8.4 $8.7 
(1)Includes expenses for month-to-month equipment leases, which are classified as short-term as the Company is not reasonably certain to renew the lease term beyond one month.
(2)Includes variable lease expenses, which are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
Financial Statement ClassificationDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(Dollars in millions)
Operating ROU assetsDeferred charges and other assets$12.9 $10.8 
Operating lease liabilities:
Current operating lease liabilitiesAccrued liabilities$1.9 $2.0 
Noncurrent operating lease liabilitiesOther deferred credits and liabilities9.8 8.2 
Total operating lease liabilities$11.7 $10.2 
The weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate were as follows:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Weighted average remaining lease term of operating leases6.7 years7.3 years
Weighted average discount rate of operating leases4.2 %4.7 %
71
Table of Contents
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2020
(Dollars in millions)
Operating cash flow information:
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities$2.7 $2.3 
Non-cash activity:
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities$3.9 $0.2 

Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Year ending December 31:
2022$2.2 
20232.2 
20242.1 
20252.0 
20261.5 
2027-Thereafter3.5 
Total lease payments13.5 
Less: imputed interest1.8 
Total lease liabilities$11.7 

15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following tables set forth the changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component:
Benefit PlansCurrency Translation AdjustmentsTotal
(Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 2019$(6.7)$(7.7)$(14.4)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications / adjustments0.1 (1.2)(1.1)
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment(1.6)— (1.6)
Net current period change in accumulated other comprehensive loss(1.5)(1.2)(2.7)
At December 31, 2020$(8.2)$(8.9)$(17.1)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications / adjustments0.3 (0.9)(0.6)
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment1.0 — 1.0 
Net current period change in accumulated other comprehensive loss1.3 (0.9)0.4 
At December 31, 2021$(6.9)$(9.8)$(16.7)
  Benefit Plans Currency Translation Adjustments Total
  (Dollars in millions)
At December 31, 2016 $(4.8) $(14.2) $(19.0)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications —
 (0.5) (0.5)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss 0.2
 —
 0.2
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment (0.8) —
 (0.8)
Net current period change in accumulated other comprehensive loss (0.6) (0.5) (1.1)
Cumulative effect from adoption of ASU 2018-02(1)
 (1.1) —
 (1.1)
At December 31, 2017 $(6.5) $(14.7) $(21.2)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications —
 (1.4) (1.4)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (0.1) —
 (0.1)
Retirement benefit plans funded status adjustment 0.6
 —
 0.6
Recognition of accumulated currency translation loss upon sale of equity method investment(2)
 —
 9.0
 9.0
Net current period change in accumulated other comprehensive loss 0.5
 7.6
 8.1
At December 31, 2018 $(6.0) $(7.1) $(13.1)
(1)As a result of the Tax Legislation, the Company revalued its deferred tax asset for our postretirement benefit plan for the impact of lower income tax rates, the impact of which was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings.
(2)These accumulated currency translation losses were recognized into income as a result of the sale of our equity method investment in VISA SunCoke.
The tax benefit associated with the Company's benefit plans as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 was $1.8$2.0 million and $1.9$2.4 million, respectively.



72
87
Table of Contents


The (decrease) increase (decrease) onin net income due to reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows(1):
 Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars in millions)
Amortization of benefit plans to net income:(2)
Actuarial loss$(0.8)$(0.6)$(0.6)
Prior service benefit0.4 0.5 0.6 
Total before taxes(0.4)(0.1)— 
Income tax0.1 — — 
Total, net of tax$(0.3)$(0.1)$— 
(1)Amounts in parentheses indicate debits to net income.
(2)These accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss components are included in the computation of postretirement benefit plan expense (benefit) and included in interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 10.
  December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Recognition of accumulated currency translation loss upon sale of equity method investment $(9.0) $—
 $—
Amortization of benefit plans to net income:(2)
      
Actuarial loss $(0.6) $(0.9) $(0.7)
Prior service benefit 0.7
 0.7
 0.7
Total, net of tax(3)
 (8.9) (0.2) —
(1)Amounts in parentheses indicate debits to net income.
(2)These accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss components are included in the computation of postretirement benefit plan expense (benefit) and included in interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 10.
(3)The related tax cost (benefit) was zero for all years presented.
15.16. Share-Based Compensation
Equity Classified Awards
Effective July 13, 2011, SunCoke Energy’s Board of Directors approved theThe SunCoke Energy, Inc. Long-Term Performance Enhancement Plan (“SunCoke LTPEP”). The SunCoke LTPEP provides for the grant of equity-based awards including stock options and share units, or restricted stock, to the Company’s directors, officers, and other employees, advisors, and consultants who are selected by the plan committee for participation in the SunCoke LTPEP.  All awards vest immediately upon a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment as defined by the SunCoke LTPEP. The plan authorizes the issuance of (i) 1,600,000 shares of SunCoke Energy common stock issuable upon the adjustment of Sunoco, Inc. equity awards in connection with the Separation and Distribution Agreement between Sunoco, Inc. and SunCoke and (ii) up to 7,500,000 shares, which reflects the 6,000,000 shares initially authorized under the Plan and an additional 1,500,000 shares to be issued under the Plan pursuant to an amendment effective February 14, 2018, of SunCoke Energy, Inc. common stock pursuant to new awards under the SunCoke LTPEP.
The Company measures the cost of employee services in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The performance metrics of equity awards are remeasured on a quarterly basis for updates to the probability of achievement. The market metrics of equity awards are not remeasured. The total cost is recognized over the requisite service period. Award forfeitures are accounted for as they occur.


88
Table of Contents


Stock Options
There were no stock options granted by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company granted the following stock options during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,2019, with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant:
   Weighted Average Per Share
 No. of Shares Exercise Price Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Traditional stock options:     
2018 grant78,447
 $10.49
 $5.38
2017 grant157,196
 $10.29
 $5.32
2016 March grant90,925
 $6.03
 $2.78
2016 February grant95,001
 $3.80
 $1.71
Performance based options:     
2017 grant80,595
 $9.85
 $5.17
2016 March grant90,925
 $6.03
 $2.42
2016 February grant58,448
 $3.80
 $1.06
Weighted Average Per Share
 Number of SharesExercise PriceWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Traditional stock options:
2019 grant267,897 $9.87 $4.09 
The stock options vest in three3 equal annual installments beginning one year from the date of grant. In order to become exercisable, the performance based options also require the closing price of the Company's common stock to reach or exceed $14.78 per share for the 2017 grants and $9.50 per share for the February and March 2016 grants for any 15 trading days during the three-year period beginning on the grant date. The February and March 2016 grants met the required stock price performance during 2016. The stock options expire ten years from the date of grant.

73
Table of Contents
The Company calculates the value of each employee stock option, estimated on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with a Monte Carlo simulation for the performance based options.model. The weighted-average fair value of employee stock options granted during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 20162019 was based on using the following weighted-average assumptions:
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Risk free interest rate3% 2% 1%
Expected term6 years
 6 years
 5 years
Volatility52% 53% 52%
Dividend yield—% —% —%
Year Ended December 31,
2019
Risk free interest rate2 %
Expected term6 years
Volatility53 %
Dividend yield2 %
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the date of grant for periods which approximate the expected life of the option. The expected term of the employee options represent the average contractual term adjusted by the average vesting period of each option tranche. We based our expected volatility on our historical volatility over our entire available trading history. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s expectation of dividend payouts at the time of grant.


89
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes information with respect to common stock option awards outstanding as of December 31, 20182021 and stock option activity during the fiscal year then ended:
 Number of
Options		 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price		 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (millions)
Outstanding at December 31, 20173,146,115
 $15.31
 5.6 $2.8
Granted78,447
 $10.49
    
Exercised(127,107) $6.49
    
Forfeited(211,667) $17.07
    
Outstanding at December 31, 20182,885,788
 $15.46
 4.8 $2.1
Exercisable at December 31, 20182,546,059
 $16.38
 4.1 $0.4
Expected to vest at December 31, 2018339,729
 $8.59
 8.2 $0.9
Number of
Options		Weighted
Average
Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (millions)
Outstanding at December 31, 20203,100,860 $15.02 3.2$0.1 
Exercised(93,887)$3.80 
Forfeited(12,836)$9.87 
Expired(906,632)17.24 
Outstanding at December 31, 20212,087,505 $14.59 3.2$0.1 
Exercisable at December 31, 20211,999,381 $14.80 2.8$0.1 
Expected to vest at December 31, 202188,124 $9.87 7.1$— 
Intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value of our common stock and the exercise price of the stock options. Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2018in 2021 was $0.3 million. In 2020 the amount was immaterial and 2017 was $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Nothere were no stock options were exercised during 2016.2019.
Restricted Stock Units
The Company granted the following restricted stock units ("RSUs") during the years ended December 31, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
Number of RSUsWeighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value per UnitGrant Date Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)
2021 grants463,476 $6.72 $3.1 
2020 grants304,332 $6.04 $1.8 
2019 grants136,425 $9.87 $1.3 
 Shares Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Grant Date Fair Value
     (Dollars in millions)
2018 grants32,128
 10.49
 $0.3
2017 grants22,628
 $9.85
 $0.2
No RSUs were granted during 2016. The RSUs vest in three3 annual installments beginning one year from the date of grant.
74
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes information with respect to RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 20182021 and RSU activity during the fiscal year then ended:
 Number of
RSUs		 Weighted
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2017106,397
 $13.53
Granted32,128
 $10.49
Vested(87,131) $14.27
Forfeited(4,181) $8.37
Nonvested at December 31, 201847,213
 $10.29
Number of
RSUs		Weighted
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value per Unit
Nonvested at December 31, 2020405,987 $7.02 
Granted463,476 $6.72 
Vested(157,626)$7.45 
Forfeited(143,819)$6.83 
Nonvested at December 31, 2021568,018 $6.70 
Total grant date fair value of RSUs vested was $1.2 million, $2.3$0.6 million and $3.7$0.2 million during 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Performance Share Units
The Company grants performance share units ("PSUs"), which represent the right to receive shares of the Company's common stock, contingent upon the attainment of Company performance and market goals and continued employment.


90
Table of Contents


The Company granted the following PSUs during the years ended December 31, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:
2019:
Number of PSUsFair Value per UnitGrant Date Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)
2021 grant(1)
177,176 $7.60 $1.3 
2020 grant(1)
228,248 $6.70 $1.5 
2019 grant(1)
227,378 $10.79 $2.5 
 Shares Fair Value per Share Grant Date Fair Value
     (Dollars in millions)
2018 grant(1)
96,389
 $11.36
 $1.1
2017 grant(2)
385,758
 $11.61
 $4.5
(1)The service period for the 20182021, 2020, and 2019 PSUs ends on December 31, 20202023, 2022 and 2021, and the awards will vest during the first quarter of 2021.
(2)2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Company granted 237,610 PSUs in February 2017, for which the service period will end on December 31, 2019, and 148,148 PSUs in December 2017, for which the service period will end on December 31, 2020. These awards will vest during the first quarter of 2020 and 2021, respectively.certain retiree eligible participants is accelerated.
The 2018 and 2017 PSU grants were both split 50/50 between the Company's three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA performance measure and the Company's three-year average pre-tax return on capital ("ROIC") performance measure for its coke and logistics businesses and unallocated corporate expenses. The number of PSU'sPSUs ultimately awarded will be determined by the Adjusted EBITDA and ROIC performance versus targets and the Company's three-year total shareholder return ("TSR") as compared to the TSR of the companies making up the Nasdaq Iron & Steel Index ("TSR Modifier"). The TSR Modifier can impact the payout between 50(between 75 percent and 150125 percent of the 2021 and 2020 awards, and between 25 percent and 125 percent of the 2019 award) of the Company's final performance measure results. The award may vest between zero and 250 percent of the original units granted. The fair value of the PSUs granted during 2018 and 2017 is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant as well as a Monte Carlo simulation for the valuation of the TSR Modifier.
The Company granted the following PSUs during the year ended December 31, 2016:
 
ROIC Portion(1)
 
TSR Portion(2)
 Total
 Shares Fair Value per Share Shares Fair Value per Share Grant Date Fair Value
         (Dollars in millions)
2016 March grant(3)
67,167
 $10.51
 201,500
 $6.35
 $2.0
2016 February grant105,210
 $5.66
 105,210
 $5.81
 $1.2
(1)The number of PSUs that ultimately vest will be determined by the Company's three-year average pre-tax return on capital for the Company's coke and logistics businesses. Additionally, only applicable to the 2016 grants, if at any time during the vesting period the closing price of the Company's common stock equals or exceeds $9.00 per share for any 15 trading days, which was met during 2016, the pre-tax return on capital portion of the award, as adjusted, will be multiplied by two.
(2)The number of PSUs that ultimately vest will be determined by the Company's three-year total shareholder return ("TSR") as compared to the TSR of the companies making up the S&P 600.
(3)The final vesting value of the TSR portion of this award cannot exceed $4.9 million.
Each portion of the award may vest between zero and 200 percent of the original units granted. The fair value of the PSUs granted are based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant as well as a Monte Carlo simulation for the portion of the award subject to a market condition. The service period for the 2016 grant ends on December 31, 2018 and the awards will vest during the first quarter of 2019.


91
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes information with respect to unearned PSUs outstanding as of December 31, 20182021 and PSU activity during the fiscal year then ended:
Number of
PSUs		Weighted
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value per Unit
Nonvested at December 31, 2020685,303 $9.76 
Granted177,176 $7.60 
Performance adjustments(70,321)11.74 
Vested(168,854)$11.74 
Forfeited(96,289)$8.42 
Nonvested at December 31, 2021527,015 8.38 


75
 Number of
PSUs		 Weighted
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2017782,781
 $10.06
Granted96,389
 $11.36
Vested(1,710) $16.90
Forfeited(125,085) $17.59
Nonvested at December 31, 2018752,375
 $8.86
Table of Contents
Liability Classified Awards
Restricted Stock Units Settled in Cash
During the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, the Company issued 108,522, 98,364230,056, 263,998 and 198,668147,851 restricted stock units to be settled in cash ("Cash RSUs"), respectively, which vest in three3 annual installments beginning one year from the grant date. The weighted average grant date fair value of the Cash RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, was $10.71, $9.82$6.68, $6.04 and $3.82,$9.66, respectively, and was based on the closing price of our common stock on the day of grant. The Cash RSU liability at December 31, 20182021 was adjusted based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 20182021 of $8.55$6.59 per share.
The cashCash RSU liability is adjusted based on the closing price of our common stock at the end of each quarterly period and was $1.9 million at December 31, 20182021 and was not material.$1.1 million December 31, 2020.
Cash Incentive Award
The Company also granted share-based compensation to eligible participants under the SunCoke Energy, Inc. Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan ("SunCoke LTCIP"), which became effective January 1, 2016. The SunCoke LTCIP is designed to provide for performance-based, cash-settled awards. All awards vest immediately upon a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment as defined by the SunCoke LTCIP.
The Company issued a grant date fair value award of $1.0$2.1 million, $0.7$2.0 million and $0.9$0.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, for which the service periods end on December 31, 2021, 20202023, 2022 and 2019,2021, respectively, and the awards will vests during the first quarter of 2022, 20212024, 2023 and 2020,2022, respectively. The 2018 and 2017 awards areservice period for certain retiree eligible participants is accelerated. The 2019 award is split 50/50 between the Company's three3-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA performance and the Company's three-year average pre-tax return on capital performance measure for its coke and logistics businesses and unallocated corporate expense.expense, consistent with the PSU awards. The ultimate award value will be determined2021 and 2020 awards are also split 50/50 between the Adjusted EBITDA and ROIC metrics, consistent with the PSU awards, but is not impacted by the performance versus targets andTSR modifier. See above for details.
The cash incentive award liability at December 31, 2021 was adjusted based on the Company's three year TSR Modifierthree-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA performance but will be capped at 250 percent of the target award.
The 2016 award value will beand adjusted based upon the Company's three-year average pre-tax return on capital for the Company's coke and logistics businesses and if at any time during the vesting period the closing price of the Company's common stock equals or exceeds $9.00 per share for any 15 trading days, which was met in 2016, the award, as adjusted, will be multiplied by two, but will be capped at 200 percent of the target award.
unallocated corporate expenses. The cash incentive award liability was $4.1 million at December 31, 2018 was adjusted based on the Company's current performance related to the above awards. The cash incentive award liability2021 and $1.3 million at December 31, 2018 was not material.2020.

Summary of Share-Based Compensation Expense
Below is a summary of the compensation expense, unrecognized compensation costs, the period for which the unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over and the estimated forfeiture rate for each award:
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019202120202019December 31, 2021
Compensation Expense(1)
Net of taxUnrecognized Compensation CostWeighted Average Remaining Recognition Period
(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)(Years)
Equity Awards:
Stock Options$0.1 $0.3 $1.1 $0.1 $0.3 $0.9 $0.1 0.2
RSUs2.3 1.9 1.0 1.8 1.5 0.9 $0.3 1.9
PSUs3.4 1.5 2.2 2.6 1.2 1.8 $2.2 1.1
Total equity awards$5.8 $3.7 $4.3 $4.5 $3.0 $3.6 
Liability Awards:
Cash RSUs$1.7 $0.8 $0.9 $1.3 $0.6 $0.7 $1.0 1.8
Cash incentive award3.4 0.6 0.4 2.6 0.4 0.3 $3.4 1.4
Total liability awards$5.1 $1.4 $1.3 $3.9 $1.0 $1.0 

(1)Compensation expense is recognized by the Company in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

76
92
Table of Contents


 Years ended December 31,    
 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 December 31, 2018
 
Compensation Expense(1)
 Net of tax Unrecognized Compensation Cost Recognition Period
 (Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions) (Years)
Equity Awards:               
Stock Options$0.5
 $1.3
 $2.1
 $0.4
 $0.8
 $1.3
 $0.5
 1.6
RSUs0.4
 1.1
 2.6
 0.3
 0.7
 1.7
 $0.3
 1.7
PSUs1.9
 1.9
 1.4
 1.7
 1.2
 0.9
 $2.6
 1.9
Total equity awards$2.8
 $4.3
 $6.1
 $2.4
 $2.7
 $3.9
    
Liability Awards:               
Cash RSUs$0.8
 $1.0
 $0.7
 $0.6
 $0.6
 $0.5
 $0.7
 1.4
Cash incentive award0.9
 0.2
 0.1
 0.7
 0.1
 0.1
 $0.9
 1.8
Total liability awards$1.7
 $1.2
 $0.8
 $1.3
 $0.7
 $0.6
    
(1)Compensation expense is recognized by the Company in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company issued $0.3 million, $0.5$0.1 million, and $0.4$0.2 million of share-based compensation to the Company's Board of Directors during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
16.17. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) has been computed by dividing net income (loss) available to SunCoke Energy, Inc. by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Except where the result would be anti-dilutive, diluted earnings per share has been computed to give effect to share-based compensation awards using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the weighted-average number of common shares used to compute basic earnings per share to those used to compute diluted EPS:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Shares in millions)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding-basic83.0 83.0 76.8 
Add: effect of dilutive share-based compensation awards0.7 0.2 — 
Weighted-average number of shares-diluted83.7 83.2 76.8 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Shares in millions)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding-basic64.7
 64.3
 64.2
Add: effect of dilutive share-based compensation awards0.8
 0.9
 0.2
Weighted-average number of shares-diluted65.5
 65.2
 64.4



93
Table of Contents


The following table shows stock options, restricted stock units, and performance stock units that are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as the shares would have been anti-dilutive:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Shares in millions)
Stock options2.5 3.2 3.0 
Restricted stock units— 0.2 0.1 
Performance stock units— 0.3 0.4 
Total2.5 3.7 3.5 

 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Shares in millions)
Stock options2.7
 2.9
 3.0
Restricted stock units—
 —
 0.2
Performance stock units0.1
 0.1
 0.2
Total2.8
 3.0
 3.4
17.18. Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain financial and non-financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value disclosures are reflected in a three-level hierarchy, maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability on the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
•Level 1—inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for an identical asset or liability in an active market.
•Level 2—inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for a similar asset or liability in an active market or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
•Level 3—inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s cash equivalents, which amounted to $3.2 million and $5.5 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively,cash equivalents were measured at fair value at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. These inputs are classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy.

77
Table of Contents
CMT Contingent Consideration
In connection with the CMT acquisition, the PartnershipCompany entered into a contingent consideration arrangement that runs through 2022 and requires the Partnershiprequired us to make future payments through 2022 to The Cline Group based on future volume over a specified threshold, price and contract renewals. ThePrior to the termination of the related contract in 2020, the fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated based on a probability-weighted analysis using significant inputs that are not observable in the market, or Level 3 inputs. Key assumptions included probability adjusted levels of handling services provided by CMT, anticipated price per ton on future salesDue to the change in market and probability of contract renewal, including length of future contracts, volume commitment, and anticipated price per ton.customer conditions in 2019, further described in Note 8, we decreased our forecasted projections, which were classified as Level 3 inputs. The fair valuedecrease in forecasted projections, as well as a payment made in 2019, resulted in a reduction of the contingent consideration was $5.0 million and $2.5 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and wasliability, primarily included in other deferred credits and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 
During 2018, CMT achieved record volumes and the Partnership increased CMT’s throughput volume projections in future periods for certain customers dueSheets, to favorable coal prices, which are expected to increase export volume through CMT. The combined impact of the strong 2018 volumes and improved volume projections resulted in an increase to the fair value of the Partnership's contingent consideration balance of $2.5 million, which was recorded as a charge to costs of products sold and operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income during 2018.
During 2017 and 2016, as a result of adverse mining conditions faced by one of our thermal coal customers, as well as fluctuating export coal pricing, the Partnership lowered CMT's throughput volume, which reduced the Partnership's contingent consideration liability balance by $1.7 million and $6.4 million, respectively. Additionally, during March 2016, as a part of commercial activities subsequent to the acquisition of CMT, the Partnership and The Cline Group signed an amended agreement, which modified the contingent consideration terms by increasing the volume threshold required for the


94
Table of Contents


Partnership to make payments to The Cline Group in exchange for future pricing modifications, resulting in a $3.7 million reduction to the contingent consideration liability. These decreaseszero at December 31, 2019. Changes in fair value were recorded as reductions to costs of products sold and operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations during 2017 and 2016.2019.
Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
At December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated to be $822.8$625.1 million and $919.7$683.9 million, respectively, compared to a carrying amount of $859.0$627.0 million and $887.3$690.5 million, respectively. These fair values were estimated by management based upon estimates of debt pricing provided by financial institutions which are considered Level 2 inputs.
18.19. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Cokemaking
Substantially all ourOur coke sales are largely made pursuant to long-term, take-or-pay agreements with AM USA, AKCliffs Steel and U.S. Steel, who are threetwo of the largest blast furnace steelmakers in North America. TheAdditionally, SunCoke entered into a five year take-or-pay provisionsagreement with Algoma Steel beginning in 2022, with average sales of approximately 150 thousand tons of blast furnace coke per year, further diversifying our customer base. These agreements require us to produce and deliver minimum annual tonnage, which varies by contract, but covers at least 90 percentthe contracted volumes of each facility's nameplate capacity. The take-or-pay provisions alsocoke and require our customers to purchase such volumes of coke up to a specified tonnage or pay the contract price for any tonnage they elect not to take. TheseAs of December 31, 2021, our coke sales agreements have anapproximately 14.7 million tons of unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations, which are expected to be delivered over a weighted average remaining contract term of approximately six years, and to date, our coke customers have satisfied their obligations under these agreements.years.
Our coke sales prices include an operating cost component, a coal cost component and a return of capital component. Operating costs under two3 of our coke sales agreements are contractual,fixed subject to an annual adjustment based on an inflation index. Under our other four4 coke sales agreements, operating costs are passed through to the respective customers subject to an annually negotiated budget, in some cases subject to a cap annually adjusted for inflation, and generally we share any difference in costs from the budgeted amounts with our customers. Our coke sales agreements contain pass-through provisions for coal and coal procurement costs, subject to meeting contractual coal-to-coke yields. To the extent that the actual coal-to-coke yields are less than the contractual standard, we are responsible for the cost of the excess coal used in the cokemaking process. Conversely, to the extent our actual coal-to-coke yields are higher than the contractual standard, we realize gains. The reimbursement of pass-through operating and coal costs from these coke sales agreements are considered to be variable consideration components included in the cokemaking sales price. The return of capital component for each ton of coke sold to the customer is determined at the time the coke sales agreement is signed and is effective for the term of each sales agreement. This component of our coke sales prices is intended to provide an adequate return on invested capital and may differ based on investment levels and other considerations. The actual return on invested capital at any facility is also impacted by favorable or unfavorable performance on pass-through cost items. Revenues are recognized when performance obligations to our customers are satisfied in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for the coke.
Foundry and Export Coke
Foundry coke sales are generally made under annual agreements with our customers for an agreed upon price and do not contain take-or-pay volume commitments. Export coke sales are generally made on a spot basis at the current market price.
Logistics
In our logistics business, handling and/or mixing services are provided to steel, coke (including some of our domestic cokemaking facilities), electric utility, coal producing and other manufacturing based customers. Materials are transported in numerous ways, including rail, truck, barge or ship. We do not take possession of materials handled, but rather act as intermediaries between our customers and end users, deriving our revenues from services provided on a per ton basis. The handling and mixing services consist primarily of two performance obligations, unloading and loading of materials. Our logistics business has long-term, take-or-pay agreements requiring us to handle over 13 million tons annually. The take-or-pay provisions in these agreements require our customers to purchase such handling services or pay the contract price for services they elect not to take. Estimated take-or-pay revenue
78
Table of approximately $305 million from all of our long-term logistics contracts is expected to be recognized over the next five years for unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations as of December 31, 2018. To date, our customers have satisfied their obligations under these agreements. Included with these long-term, take-or-pay arrangements are our contracts with Murray and Foresight, which cover 10 million tons of CMT's annual transloading capacity of 15 million tons. Contents
Revenues are recognized when the customer receives the benefits of the services provided, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we will receive in exchange for those services. Billings
Estimated take-or-pay revenue of approximately $24.3 million from all of our multi-year logistics contracts is expected to CMT customersbe recognized over the next two years for take-or-pay volume shortfalls based on pro-rata volume commitments under take-or-pay contracts that are in excessunsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations as of billings earned for services provided are recorded as contract liabilities and characterized as deferred revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred revenue is recognized at the earliest of i) when the performance obligation is satisfied; ii) when the performance obligation has expired, based on the terms of the contract; or iii) when the likelihood that the customer would exercise its right to the performance obligation becomes remote.



95
Table of Contents



The following table provides changes in the Company's deferred revenue:
  2018 2017
  (Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively $1.7
 $2.5
Reclassification of the beginning contract liabilities to revenue, as a result of performance obligation satisfied (1.4) (2.1)
Billings in excess of services performed, not recognized as revenue 2.7
 1.3
Ending balance at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively $3.0
 $1.7
December 31, 2021.
Energy
Our energy sales are made pursuant to either steam or energy supply and purchase agreements or is sold into the regional power market. Our cokemaking ovens utilize efficient, modern heat recovery technology designed to combust the coal’s volatile components liberated during the cokemaking process and use the resulting heat to create steam or electricity for sale. The energy provided under these arrangements resultresults in transfer of control over time. Revenues are recognized over time as energy is delivered to our customers, in an amount based on the terms of each arrangement.
Operating and Licensing Fees
Operating and licensing fees are made pursuant to long-term contracts with ArcelorMittal Brazil, where we operate a Brazilian cokemaking facility. The licensing fees are based upon the level of production required by our customer as well as a fixed annual fee. Operating fees include the full pass-through of the operating costs of the Brazilian facility as well as a per ton fee based on the level of production required by our customer. Revenues are recognized over time as our customers receive and consume the benefits in an amount that corresponds directly with the value provided to the customer to date.
Disaggregated Sales and Other Operating Revenue
The following table provides disaggregated sales and other operating revenue by product or service, excluding intersegment revenues:
  Years Ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
       
  (Dollars in millions)
Sales and other operating revenue:      
Cokemaking $1,250.5
 $1,140.8
 $1,038.2
Energy 49.7
 53.2
 54.3
Logistics 101.0
 89.7
 82.9
Operating and licensing fees 40.4
 43.4
 39.5
Other 9.3
 4.4
 8.4
Sales and other operating revenue $1,450.9
 $1,331.5
 $1,223.3
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Sales and other operating revenue:
Cokemaking$1,293.6 $1,218.9 $1,434.9 
Energy56.1 43.6 51.1 
Logistics64.3 35.5 72.1 
Operating and licensing fees36.6 31.6 38.4 
Other5.4 3.4 3.8 
Sales and other operating revenue$1,456.0 $1,333.0 $1,600.3 
Disaggregated sales and other operating revenue by customer is discussed in Note 4.

19.20. Business Segment Information
The Company reports its business through three3 segments: Domestic Coke, Brazil Coke and Logistics. The Domestic Coke segment includes the Jewell, Indiana Harbor, Haverhill, Granite City and Middletown cokemaking facilities. Each of these facilities produces coke, and all facilities except Jewell recover waste heat, which is converted to steam or electricity through a similar production process.
The Brazil Coke segment includes the licensing and operating fees payable to us under long-term contracts with ArcelorMittal Brazil, under which we operate a cokemaking facility located in Vitória, Brazil through at least 2023.


96
Tablethe second quarter of Contents


2023.
Logistics operations are comprised of CMT, KRT, Lake Terminal, which provides services to our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility, and DRT, which provides services to our Jewell cokemaking facility. Handling and mixing results are presented in the Logistics segment.
Corporate expenses that can be identified with a segment have been included in determining segment results. The remainder is included in Corporate and Other. Corporate and Other, which also includes activity from our legacy coal mining business.
Segment assets are those assets utilized within a specific segment and exclude taxes.


79
Table of Contents
The following table includes Adjusted EBITDA, as defined below, which is the measure of segment profit or loss and liquidity reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources to the segments and assessing their performance:
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (Dollars in millions)
Sales and other operating revenue:
Domestic Coke$1,354.5 $1,265.4 $1,489.1 
Brazil Coke36.6 31.6 38.4 
Logistics64.9 36.0 72.8 
Logistics intersegment sales27.1 22.1 26.3 
Elimination of intersegment sales(27.1)(22.1)(26.3)
Total sales and other operating revenue$1,456.0 $1,333.0 $1,600.3 
Adjusted EBITDA:
Domestic Coke$243.4 $217.0 $226.7 
Brazil Coke17.2 13.5 16.0 
Logistics43.5 17.3 42.6 
Corporate and Other(1)
(28.7)(41.9)(37.4)
Total Adjusted EBITDA$275.4 $205.9 $247.9 
Depreciation and amortization expense:
Domestic Coke$119.0 $119.1 $120.5 
Brazil Coke0.4 0.5 0.6 
Logistics13.3 12.8 21.4 
Corporate and Other1.2 1.3 1.3 
Total depreciation and amortization expense$133.9 $133.7 $143.8 
Capital expenditures:
Domestic Coke$83.1 $60.0 $105.2 
Brazil Coke0.3 0.4 0.3 
Logistics14.7 13.5 4.6 
Corporate and Other0.5 — — 
Total capital expenditures$98.6 $73.9 $110.1 
  Years Ended December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
  (Dollars in millions)
Sales and other operating revenue:      
Domestic Coke $1,308.3
 $1,195.0
 $1,097.6
Brazil Coke 40.4
 43.4
 39.5
Logistics 102.2
 93.1
 84.7
Logistics intersegment sales 24.5
 23.8
 23.2
Corporate and Other(1)
 —
 —
 1.5
Corporate and Other intersegment sales(1)
 —
 —
 22.0
Elimination of intersegment sales (24.5) (23.8) (45.2)
Total sales and other operating revenue $1,450.9
 $1,331.5
 $1,223.3
       
Adjusted EBITDA      
Domestic Coke $207.9
 $188.9
 $193.9
Brazil Coke 18.4
 18.2
 16.2
Logistics 72.6
 70.8
 63.9
Corporate and Other(2)
 (35.7) (43.2) (57.0)
Total Adjusted EBITDA $263.2
 $234.7
 $217.0
       
Depreciation and amortization expense:      
Domestic Coke(3)
 $114.4
 $102.6
 $84.0
Brazil Coke 0.7
 0.7
 0.7
Logistics 25.1
 24.4
 24.8
Corporate and Other 1.4
 0.5
 4.7
Total depreciation and amortization expense $141.6
 $128.2
 $114.2
       
Capital expenditures:      
Domestic Coke $95.1
 $68.8
 $44.6
Logistics 5.2
 4.4
 17.4
Corporate and Other —
 2.4
 1.7
Total capital expenditures $100.3
 $75.6
 $63.7
(1) Corporate and Other revenues are related to our legacy coal mining business, which was disposed in April 2016.
(2) Corporate and Other includes the activity from our legacy coal mining business, which incurred Adjusted EBITDA losses of $9.8$1.9 million, $10.5$13.2 million, and $15.0$11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
(3)We revised the estimated useful lives of certain assets in our Domestic Coke segment, primarily as a result of plans to replace major components of certain heat recovery steam generators with upgraded materials and design, resulting in additional depreciation of $9.2 million, or $0.14 per common share, during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Additionally, Corporate and Other includes foundry related research and development costs of $3.9 million during 2020.

80
97
Table of Contents


The following table sets forth the Company’s segment assets:
December 31,
20212020
(Dollars in millions)
Segment assets:
Domestic Coke$1,370.6 $1,358.9 
Brazil Coke18.0 17.7 
Logistics202.9 199.5 
Corporate and Other23.9 31.8 
Segment assets, excluding income tax receivable1,615.4 1,607.9 
Tax receivable— 5.5 
Total assets$1,615.4 $1,613.4 
  December 31,
  2018 2017
  (Dollars in millions)
Segment assets    
Domestic Coke $1,446.5
 $1,439.7
Brazil Coke 15.1
 10.9
Logistics 463.0
 491.9
Corporate and Other 120.0
 112.8
Segment assets, excluding income tax receivable 2,044.6
 2,055.3
Tax assets 0.7
 4.8
Total assets $2,045.3
 $2,060.1
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on segment Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as earnings before interest, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), adjusted for any impairments, coal rationalizationrestructuring costs, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, changes to our contingent consideration liability related to our acquisition of CMT and/or transaction costs incurred as part of the expiration of certain acquired contractual obligations, and loss on disposal of our interest in VISA SunCoke.Simplification Transaction. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent and should not be considered alternatives to net income or operating income under GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures in other businesses.
Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure of thein assessing operating performance and liquidity of the Company's net assets and its ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions.performance. Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors because it highlights trends in our business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on GAAP measures and because it eliminates items that have less bearing on our operating performance and liquidity.performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and they should not be considered a substitute for net income, operating cash flow or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Set forth below is additional discussion of the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA as an analytical tool.
Limitations. OtherAdditionally, other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. Adjusted EBITDA also has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations include that Adjusted EBITDA:
does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
does not reflect items such as depreciation and amortization;
does not reflect changes in, or cash requirement for, working capital needs;
does not reflect our interest expense, orBelow is the cash requirements necessary to service interest on or principal payments of our debt;
does not reflect certain other non-cash income and expenses
excludes income taxes that may represent a reduction in available cash; and
includes net income attributable to noncontrolling interests


98
Table of Contents


Below are reconciliationsreconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income and Adjusted EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities,(loss), which areis its most directly comparable financial measuresmeasure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP:
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(Dollars in millions)
Net income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$43.4 $3.7 $(152.3)
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests5.4 5.1 3.9 
Net income (loss)$48.8 $8.8 $(148.4)
Add:
Long-lived asset and goodwill impairment— — 247.4 
Depreciation and amortization expense133.9 133.7 143.8 
Interest expense, net42.5 56.3 60.3 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net31.9 (5.7)(1.5)
Income tax expense (benefit)18.3 10.3 (54.7)
Contingent consideration adjustments(1)
— — (4.2)
Restructuring costs(2)
— 2.5 — 
Simplification Transaction costs(3)
— — 5.2 
Adjusted EBITDA$275.4 $205.9 $247.9 
Subtract: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests(4)
9.3 9.1 40.7 
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$266.1 $196.8 $207.2 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$185.8
 $148.5
 $219.1
Subtract:     
Depreciation and amortization expense141.6
 128.2
 114.2
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense(3.4) (87.2) 3.1
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt0.3
 20.4
 (25.0)
Loss on divestiture of business—
 —
 14.7
Loss from equity method investment5.4
 —
 —
Changes in working capital and other(5.1) (16.4) 52.6
Net income$47.0
 $103.5
 $59.5
Add:     
Depreciation and amortization expense141.6
 128.2
 114.2
Interest expense, net(1)
61.4
 60.6
 53.5
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt0.3
 20.4
 (25.0)
Income tax expense (benefit)4.6
 (81.6) 8.6
Contingent consideration adjustments(2)
2.5
 (1.7) (10.1)
Transaction costs(3)
0.4
 —
 —
Expiration of land deposits and write-off of costs related to potential new cokemaking facility(4)
—
 5.3
 1.9
Non-cash reversal of acquired contractual obligation(5)
—
 —
 (0.7)
Loss on divestiture of business—
 —
 14.7
Coal rationalization costs(6)
—
 —
 0.4
Loss from equity method investment5.4
 —
 —
Adjusted EBITDA$263.2
 $234.7
 $217.0
Subtract: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interest(7)
82.0
 86.4
 86.6
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$181.2
 $148.3
 $130.4
(1)In conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2017-07, the non-service type expense associated with the postretirement benefit plans was excluded from operating income and recorded in interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income during the periods presented. Amounts in prior periods were immaterial, and therefore, were not reclassified in the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income and net cash provided by operating activities.
(2)Adjustments to the fair value of the contingent consideration in 2018, 2017 and 2016 were primarily the result of modifications to the volume forecast. See Note 17.
(3)Represents costs incurred in connection with the Simplification Transaction.
(4)In 2014, we finalized the required permitting and engineering plan for a potential new cokemaking facility, however, the project was terminated. As a result, during 2017 and 2016, the Company wrote-off previously capitalized engineering costs and land deposits for a potential new cokemaking facility of $5.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively. These costs were included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(5)In association with the acquisition of CMT, we assumed certain performance obligations under existing contracts and recorded liabilities related to such obligations. In 2016, the Partnership reversed the liability as we no longer had any obligations under the contracts.

(1)In connection with the CMT acquisition, the Company entered into a contingent consideration arrangement that requires the Company to make future payments to the seller based on future volume over a specified threshold, price and contract

81
99
Table of Contents


renewals. Adjustments to the fair value of the contingent consideration were primarily the result of modifications to the volume forecast. This liability was written to zero during the third quarter of 2019, and the related contract was terminated in 2020. See Note 18.
(6)Prior to the divestiture of our coal mining business, the Company incurred coal rationalization costs including employee severance, contract termination costs and other costs to idle mines during the execution of our coal rationalization plan.
(7)
(2)Charges related to a company-wide restructuring and cost-reduction initiative.
(3)Costs expensed primarily by the Partnership associated with the Simplification Transaction.
(4)Reflects noncontrolling interests in Indiana Harbor and the portion of the Partnership owned by public unitholders.
20. Selected Quarterly Data (unaudited)
 2018 2017
 First
Quarter		 Second
Quarter		 Third
Quarter		 
Fourth
Quarter(1)
 
First
Quarter(2)
 
Second
Quarter(3)
 Third
Quarter		 
Fourth
Quarter(1)(4)
 (Dollars in millions)
Sales and other operating revenue$350.5
 $367.0
 $364.5
 $368.9
 $309.7
 $323.2
 $339.0
 $359.6
Gross profit(5)
$47.0
 $52.3
 $45.8
 $39.7
 $42.2
 $32.9
 $51.3
 $56.8
Net income (loss)$13.0
 $11.4
 $17.1
 $5.5
 $(57.7) $(31.5) $18.8
 $173.9
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests$4.3
 $7.2
 $5.6
 $3.7
 $(58.7) $(7.3) $7.2
 $39.9
Net income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$8.7
 $4.2
 $11.5
 $1.8
 $1.0
 $(24.2) $11.6
 $134.0
Earnings (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc. per common share:               
Basic(6)
$0.13
 $0.06
 $0.18
 $0.03
 $0.02
 $(0.38) $0.18
 $2.08
Diluted(6)
$0.13
 $0.06
 $0.18
 $0.03
 $0.02
 $(0.38) $0.18
 $2.05
(1)The Partnership recognized deferred revenue from Logistics take-or-pay billings for minimum volume shortfalls of $16.4 million into revenue in the fourth quarter of 2017. As a result of the increase in tons handled throughout 2018, there were no shortfalls to be recognized during the fourth quarter.
(2)The first quarter of 2017 reflects the net impact to the Company’s deferred tax expense of $64.2 million related to the IRS Final Regulations on qualifying income all of which was attributable to unitholders of the Partnership. See Note 5.
(3)During the second quarter of 2017, the Partnership incurred $20.2 million of losses in connection with debt refinancing.
(4)During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded $154.7 million of tax benefits as a result of the new Tax Legislation, $125.0 million of which was attributable to the Company. See Note 5.
(5)Gross profit equals sales and other operating revenue less cost of products sold and operating expenses and depreciation and amortization.
(6)Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly basic and diluted per share information may not equal annual basic and diluted earnings per share.


100
Table of Contents


21. Supplemental Condensed Combining and Consolidating Financial Information
Certain 100 percent owned subsidiaries of the Company serve as guarantors of the obligations under the Credit Agreement (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). These guarantees are full and unconditional (subject, in the case of the Guarantor Subsidiaries, to customary release provisions as described below) and joint and several. For purposes of the following information, SunCoke Energy is referred to as “Issuer.” The indenture dated July 26, 2011 among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., governs subsidiaries designated as “Guarantor Subsidiaries.” All other consolidated subsidiaries of the Company are collectively referred to as “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.”
The ability of the Partnership and Indiana Harbor to pay dividends and make loansowned by public unitholders prior to the Company is restricted under the partnership agreements of the Partnership and Indiana Harbor, respectively. The credit agreement governing the Partnership’s credit facility and the indenture governing the Partnership Notes contain customary provisions which would potentially restrict the Partnership’s ability to make distributions or loans to the Company under certain circumstances. For the year ended December 31, 2018, less than 25 percent of net assets were restricted. Additionally, certain coal mining entities are designated as unrestricted subsidiaries. As such, all the subsidiaries described above are presented as "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries."Simplification Transaction.
The guarantee of a Guarantor Subsidiary will terminate upon:
a sale or other disposition of the Guarantor Subsidiary or of all or substantially all of its assets;
a sale of the majority of the Capital Stock of a Guarantor Subsidiary to a third-party, after which the Guarantor Subsidiary is no longer a "Restricted Subsidiary" in accordance with the indenture governing the Notes;
the liquidation or dissolution of a Guarantor Subsidiary so long as no "Default" or "Event of Default", as defined under the indenture governing the Notes, has occurred as a result thereof;
the requirements for defeasance or discharge of the indentures governing the Notes having been satisfied; or
the release, other than the discharge through payments by a Guarantor Subsidiary, from its guarantee under the Credit Agreement or other indebtedness that resulted in the obligation of the Guarantor Subsidiary under the indenture governing the Notes
The following supplemental condensed combining and consolidating financial information reflects the Issuer’s separate accounts, the combined accounts of the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the combined accounts of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, the combining and consolidating adjustments and eliminations and the Issuer’s consolidated accounts for the dates and periods indicated. For purposes of the following condensed combining and consolidating information, the Issuer’s investments in its subsidiaries and the Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries’ investments in its subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.



101
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)
 Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Revenues         
Sales and other operating revenue$—
 $216.0
 $1,239.5
 $(4.6) $1,450.9
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries34.3
 25.2
 —
 (59.5) —
Total revenues, net of equity in earnings of subsidiaries34.3
 241.2
 1,239.5
 (64.1) 1,450.9
Costs and operating expenses         
Cost of products sold and operating expenses—
 165.7
 963.4
 (4.6) 1,124.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses6.5
 11.8
 47.8
 —
 66.1
Depreciation and amortization expenses—
 8.8
 132.8
 —
 141.6
Total costs and operating expenses6.5

186.3

1,144.0

(4.6)
1,332.2
Operating income27.8
 54.9
 95.5
 (59.5) 118.7
Interest (income) expense, net - affiliate—
 (6.0) 6.0
 —
 —
Interest expense (income), net3.1
 (1.6) 59.9
 —
 61.4
Total interest expense (income), net
3.1
 (7.6) 65.9
 —
 61.4
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.3
 —
 —
 —
 0.3
Income before income tax (benefit) expense24.4

62.5

29.6

(59.5) 57.0
Income tax (benefit) expense(1.8) 12.1
 (5.7) —
 4.6
Loss from equity method investment—
 —
 5.4
 —
 5.4
Net income26.2

50.4

29.9

(59.5) 47.0
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 20.8
 —
 20.8
Net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$26.2
 $50.4
 $9.1
 $(59.5) $26.2
Comprehensive income$34.3
 $50.6
 $37.8
 $(67.6) $55.1
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 20.8
 —
 20.8
Comprehensive income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$34.3
 $50.6
 $17.0
 $(67.6) $34.3



102
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)
 Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Revenues         
Sales and other operating revenue$—
 $209.6
 $1,126.3
 $(4.4) $1,331.5
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries109.9
 (54.5) —
 (55.4) —
Total revenues, net of equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries109.9
 155.1
 1,126.3
 (59.8) 1,331.5
Costs and operating expenses         
Cost of products sold and operating expenses—
 156.6
 867.9
 (4.4) 1,020.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses8.7
 22.7
 47.6
 —
 79.0
Depreciation and amortization expenses—
 7.5
 120.7
 —
 128.2
Total costs and operating expenses8.7
 186.8
 1,036.2
 (4.4) 1,227.3
Operating income (loss)101.2
 (31.7) 90.1
 (55.4) 104.2
Interest (income) expense, net - affiliate—
 (7.5) 7.5
 —
 —
Interest expense, net4.9
 0.1
 56.9
 —
 61.9
Total interest expense (income), net
4.9
 (7.4) 64.4
 —
 61.9
Gain on extinguishment of debt0.4
 —
 20.0
 —
 20.4
Income (loss) before income tax (benefit) expense95.9

(24.3)
5.7

(55.4) 21.9
Income tax (benefit) expense(26.5) (150.2) 95.1
 —
 (81.6)
Net income (loss)122.4

125.9

(89.4)
(55.4) 103.5
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 (18.9) —
 (18.9)
Net income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$122.4
 $125.9
 $(70.5) $(55.4) $122.4
Comprehensive income (loss)$121.3
 $125.3
 $(91.0) $(53.2) $102.4
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 (18.9) —
 (18.9)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$121.3
 $125.3
 $(72.1) $(53.2) $121.3



103
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions)
 Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Revenues         
Sales and other operating revenue$—
 $176.7
 $1,050.5
 $(3.9) $1,223.3
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries19.7
 51.3
 —
 (71.0) —
Total revenues, net of equity in earnings of subsidiaries19.7
 228.0
 1,050.5
 (74.9) 1,223.3
Costs and operating expenses         
Cost of products sold and operating expenses—
 130.7
 779.1
 (3.9) 905.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses12.9
 25.6
 52.1
 —
 90.6
Depreciation and amortization expenses—
 9.2
 105.0
 —
 114.2
Loss on divestiture of business and impairments—
 —
 14.7
 —
 14.7
Total costs and operating expenses12.9
 165.5
 950.9
 (3.9) 1,125.4
Operating income6.8
 62.5
 99.6
 (71.0) 97.9
Interest (income) expense, net - affiliate—
 (7.6) 7.6
 —
 —
Interest expense, net6.0
 0.3
 48.5
 —
 54.8
Total interest expense (income), net
6.0
 (7.3) 56.1
 —
 54.8
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net—
 —
 (25.0) —
 (25.0)
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and loss (gain) from equity method investment0.8

69.8

68.5

(71.0) 68.1
Income tax (benefit) expense(13.6) 38.7
 (16.5) —
 8.6
Net income14.4

31.1

85.0

(71.0) 59.5
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 45.1
 —
 45.1
Net income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$14.4
 $31.1
 $39.9
 $(71.0) $14.4
Comprehensive income$15.2
 $30.8
 $86.1
 $(71.8) $60.3
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 45.1
 —
 45.1
Comprehensive income attributable to SunCoke Energy, Inc.$15.2
 $30.8
 $41.0
 $(71.8) $15.2





104
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
  Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents $—
 $123.2
 $22.5
 $—
 $145.7
Receivables —
 13.3
 62.1
 —
 75.4
Inventories —
 10.6
 99.8
 —
 110.4
Income tax receivable —
 —
 96.1
 (95.4) 0.7
Other current assets —
 1.8
 1.0
 —
 2.8
Advances to affiliates —
 281.1
 —
 (281.1) —
Total current assets —
 430.0
 281.5
 (376.5) 335.0
Notes receivable from affiliate —
 —
 200.0
 (200.0) —
Properties, plants and equipment, net —
 54.3
 1,416.8
 —
 1,471.1
Goodwill —
 3.4
 73.5
 —
 76.9
Other intangibles assets, net —
 1.1
 155.7
 —
 156.8
Deferred income taxes 7.0
 —
 —
 (7.0) —
Deferred charges and other assets —
 5.1
 0.4
 —
 5.5
Total assets $7.0
 $493.9
 $2,127.9
 $(583.5) $2,045.3
Liabilities and Equity         
Advances from affiliate $167.3
 $—
 $113.8
 $(281.1) $—
Accounts payable —
 14.7
 100.3
 —
 115.0
Accrued liabilities 1.8
 13.7
 30.1
 —
 45.6
Deferred revenue —
 —
 3.0
 —
 3.0
Current portion of long-term debt and financing
obligation		 1.1
 —
 2.8
 —
 3.9
Interest payable 0.4
 —
 3.2
 —
 3.6
Income taxes payable 1.9
 93.5
 —
 (95.4) —
Total current liabilities 172.5

121.9

253.2

(376.5) 171.1
Long term-debt and financing obligation 41.2
 —
 793.3
 —
 834.5
Payable to affiliate —
 200.0
 —
 (200.0) —
Accrual for black lung benefits —
 10.9
 34.0
 —
 44.9
Retirement benefit liabilities —
 12.2
 13.0
 —
 25.2
Deferred income taxes —
 194.9
 66.8
 (7.0) 254.7
Asset retirement obligations —
 —
 14.6
 —
 14.6
Other deferred credits and liabilities 3.5
 6.6
 7.5
 —
 17.6
Total liabilities 217.2

546.5

1,182.4

(583.5) 1,362.6
Equity          
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 50,000,000
shares; no issued and outstanding shares at
December 31, 2018		 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized
300,000,000 shares; issued 72,223,750 shares at
December 31, 2018		 0.7
 —
 —
 —
 0.7
Treasury stock, 7,477,657 shares at December 31, 2018 (140.7) —
 —
 

 (140.7)
Additional paid-in capital 488.9
 61.0
 612.8
 (673.9) 488.8
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (13.1) (2.0) (11.1) 13.1
 (13.1)
Retained earnings 127.5
 526.1
 124.2
 (650.4) 127.4
Equity investment eliminations (673.5) (637.7) —
 1,311.2
 —
Total SunCoke Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity (210.2) (52.6) 725.9
 —
 463.1
Noncontrolling interests —
 —
 219.6
 —
 219.6
Total equity (210.2) (52.6) 945.5
 —
 682.7
Total liabilities and equity $7.0
 $493.9
 $2,127.9
 $(583.5) $2,045.3


105
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
  Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents $—
 $103.6
 $16.6
 $—
 $120.2
Receivables —
 17.1
 51.4
 —
 68.5
Inventories —
 9.1
 101.9
 —
 111.0
Income taxes receivable —
 —
 88.1
 (83.3) 4.8
Other current assets —
 4.6
 2.1
 —
 6.7
Advances to affiliate —
 245.8
 —
 (245.8) —
Total current assets —

380.2

260.1

(329.1) 311.2
Notes receivable from affiliate —
 89.0
 300.0
 (389.0) —
Properties, plants and equipment, net —
 59.8
 1,441.5
 —
 1,501.3
Goodwill —
 3.4
 73.5
 —
 76.9
Other intangible assets, net —
 1.7
 166.2
 —
 167.9
Deferred income taxes 7.1
 —
 —
 (7.1) —
Deferred charges and other assets —
 2.3
 0.5
 —
 2.8
Total assets $7.1
 $536.4
 $2,241.8
 $(725.2) $2,060.1
Liabilities and Equity          
Advances from affiliate $162.2
 $—
 $83.6
 $(245.8) $—
Accounts payable —
 16.4
 99.1
 —
 115.5
Accrued liabilities 1.5
 19.7
 32.0
 —
 53.2
Deferred Revenue —
 —
 1.7
 —
 1.7
Current portion of long-term debt and financing obligation —
 —
 2.6
 —
 2.6
Interest payable 1.4
 —
 4.0
 —
 5.4
Income taxes payable 1.9
 81.4
 —
 (83.3) —
Total current liabilities 167.0

117.5

223.0

(329.1) 178.4
Long-term debt and financing obligation 42.7
 —
 818.4
 —
 861.1
Payable to affiliate —
 300.0
 89.0
 (389.0) —
Accrual for black lung benefits —
 11.8
 33.1
 —
 44.9
Retirement benefit liabilities —
 13.7
 14.5
 —
 28.2
Deferred income taxes —
 193.8
 71.1
 (7.1) 257.8
Asset retirement obligations —
 —
 14.0
 —
 14.0
Other deferred credits and liabilities 3.7
 6.4
 6.0
 —
 16.1
Total liabilities 213.4

643.2

1,269.1

(725.2)
1,400.5
Equity          
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; no issued and outstanding shares at December 31, 2017 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 300,000,000 shares; issued 71,707,304 shares at December 31, 2017 0.7
 —
 —
 —
 0.7
Treasury stock, 7,477,657 shares at
December 31, 2017		 (140.7) —
 —
 —
 (140.7)
Additional paid-in capital 486.2
 141.0
 641.9
 (782.9) 486.2
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (21.2) (2.2) (19.0) 21.2
 (21.2)
Retained earnings 101.2
 475.6
 116.4
 (592.0) 101.2
Equity investment eliminations (632.5) (721.2) —
 1,353.7
 —
Total SunCoke Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity (206.3) (106.8) 739.3
 —
 426.2
Noncontrolling interests —
 —
 233.4
 —
 233.4
Total equity (206.3) (106.8) 972.7
 —
 659.6
Total liabilities and equity $7.1
 $536.4
 $2,241.8
 $(725.2) $2,060.1


106
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)
 Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:         
Net income (loss)$26.2
 $50.4
 $29.9
 $(59.5) $47.0
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:         
Loss from equity method investment—
 —
 5.4
 —
 5.4
Depreciation and amortization expense—
 8.8
 132.8
 —
 141.6
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense(0.2) 1.2
 (4.4) —
 (3.4)
Gain on curtailment and payments in excess of expense for postretirement plan benefits—
 (1.0) (1.4) —
 (2.4)
Share-based compensation expense3.1
 —
 —
 —
 3.1
Equity in loss of subsidiaries
(34.3) (25.2) —
 59.5
 —
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.3
 —
 —
 —
 0.3
Changes in working capital pertaining to operating activities:         
Receivables—
 3.8
 (10.7) —
 (6.9)
Inventories—
 (1.5) 2.1
 —
 0.6
Accounts payable—
 (1.6) 0.9
 —
 (0.7)
Accrued liabilities0.4
 (5.9) (1.8) —
 (7.3)
Deferred revenue—
 —
 1.3
 —
 1.3
Interest payable(1.0) —
 (0.8) —
 (1.8)
Income taxes0.3
 12.2
 (8.0) —
 4.5
Other0.3
 (0.9) 5.1
 —
 4.5
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(4.9) 40.3
 150.4
 —
 185.8
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:         
Capital expenditures—
 (2.8) (97.5) —
 (100.3)
Sale of equity method investment—
 —
 4.0
 —
 4.0
Other investing activities—
 —
 0.5
 —
 0.5
Net cash used in investing activities—
 (2.8) (93.0) —
 (95.8)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:         
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt45.0
 —
 —
 —
 45.0
Repayment of long-term debt(45.7) —
 —
 —
 (45.7)
Debt issuance costs(0.5) —
 —
 —
 (0.5)
Proceeds from revolving facility—
 —
 179.5
 —
 179.5
Repayment of revolving facility—
 —
 (204.5) —
 (204.5)
Repayment of financing obligation—
 —
 (2.6) —
 (2.6)
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests—
 —
 (31.9) —
 (31.9)
Acquisition of additional interest in the Partnership—
 (4.2) —
 —
 (4.2)
Other financing activities0.7
 —
 (0.3) —
 0.4
Net increase (decrease) in advances from affiliates5.4
 (13.7) 8.3
 —
 —
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities4.9
 (17.9) (51.5) —
 (64.5)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—
 19.6
 5.9
 —
 25.5
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year—
 103.6
 16.6
 —
 120.2
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$—
 $123.2
 $22.5
 $—
 $145.7


107
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)
  Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:          
Net income (loss) $122.4
 $125.9
 $(89.4) $(55.4) $103.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization expense —
 7.5
 120.7
 —
 128.2
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense (22.8) (170.1) 105.7
 —
 (87.2)
Gain on curtailment and payments in excess of expense for postretirement plan benefits —
 (1.0) (0.8) —
 (1.8)
Share-based compensation expense 4.7
 —
 0.1
 —
 4.8
Equity in (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
 (109.9) 54.5
 —
 55.4
 —
Loss on extinguishment of debt 0.4
 —
 20.0
 —
 20.4
Changes in working capital pertaining to operating activities (net of the effects of divestiture):          
Receivables —
 (4.9) (2.9) —
 (7.8)
Inventories —
 (0.1) (18.4) —
 (18.5)
Accounts payable —
 3.0
 8.7
 —
 11.7
Accrued liabilities (0.2) (1.3) 4.1
 —
 2.6
Deferred revenue —
 —
 (0.8) —
 (0.8)
Interest payable (0.1) —
 (10.7) —
 (10.8)
Income taxes (2.7) 16.3
 (13.8) —
 (0.2)
Other 1.3
 —
 3.1
 —
 4.4
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (6.9) 29.8
 125.6
 —
 148.5
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:          
Capital expenditures —
 (4.1) (71.5) —
 (75.6)
Return of Brazilian investment —
 —
 20.5
 —
 20.5
Net cash used in investing activities —
 (4.1) (51.0) —
 (55.1)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:          
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt —
 —
 693.7
 —
 693.7
Repayment of long-term debt —
 —
 (644.9) —
 (644.9)
Debt issuance costs (1.6) —
 (15.8) —
 (17.4)
Proceeds from revolving facility —
 —
 350.0
 —
 350.0
Repayment of revolving facility —
 —
 (392.0) —
 (392.0)
Repayment of financing obligation —
 —
 (2.5) —
 (2.5)
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests —
 —
 (47.0) —
 (47.0)
Acquisition of additional interest in the Partnership —
 (48.7) —
 —
 (48.7)
Other financing activities 1.1
 —
 —
 —
 1.1
Net increase (decrease) in advances from affiliates 7.4
 66.9
 (74.3) —
 —
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 6.9
 18.2
 (132.8) —
 (107.7)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash —
 43.9
 (58.2) —
 (14.3)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year —
 59.7
 74.8
 —
 134.5
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year $—
 $103.6
 $16.6
 $—
 $120.2


108
Table of Contents


SunCoke Energy, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions)
  Issuer Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries		 Combining
and
Consolidating
Adjustments		 Total
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:          
Net income $14.4
 $31.1
 $85.0
 $(71.0) $59.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization expense —
 9.2
 105.0
 —
 114.2
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense (16.6) 8.7
 11.0
 —
 3.1
Gain on curtailment and payments in excess of expense for postretirement plan benefits —
 (1.5) (1.1) —
 (2.6)
Share-based compensation expense 6.5
 —
 —
 —
 6.5
Equity in loss of subsidiaries
 (19.7) (51.3) —
 71.0
 —
Gain on extinguishment of debt —
 —
 (25.0) —
 (25.0)
Loss on divestiture of business and impairments —
 —
 14.7
 —
 14.7
Changes in working capital pertaining to operating activities (net of acquisitions):          
Receivables —
 (4.3) 8.0
 —
 3.7
Inventories —
 (3.7) 33.1
 —
 29.4
Accounts payable —
 4.6
 (5.4) —
 (0.8)
Accrued liabilities 1.5
 4.8
 0.5
 —
 6.8
Deferred revenue —
 —
 0.4
 —
 0.4
Interest payable 0.1
 —
 (2.8) —
 (2.7)
Income taxes (6.9) 28.2
 (14.3) —
 7.0
Other 2.5
 8.9
 (6.5) —
 4.9
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (18.2) 34.7
 202.6
 —
 219.1
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:          
Capital expenditures —
 (5.7) (58.0) —
 (63.7)
Return of Brazilian investment —
 —
 20.5
 —
 20.5
Divestiture of coal business —
 —
 (12.8) —
 (12.8)
Other investing activities —
 —
 2.1
 —
 2.1
Net cash used in investing activities —
 (5.7) (48.2) —
 (53.9)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:          
Repayment of long-term debt —
 —
 (66.1) —
 (66.1)
Debt issuance costs —
 —
 (0.2) —
 (0.2)
Proceeds from revolving facility —
 —
 28.0
 —
 28.0
Repayment of revolving facility (60.4) —
 (38.0) —
 (98.4)
Proceeds from financing obligation —
 —
 16.2
 —
 16.2
Repayment of financing obligation —
 —
 (1.0) —
 (1.0)
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests —
 —
 (49.4) —
 (49.4)
Other financing activities (0.3) (1.1) —
 —
 (1.4)
Net increase (decrease) in advances from affiliates 78.9
 (38.8) (40.1) —
 —
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 18.2
 (39.9) (150.6) —
 (172.3)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash —
 (10.9) 3.8
 —
 (7.1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year —
 70.6
 71.0
 —
 141.6
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year $—
 $59.7
 $74.8
 $—
 $134.5


109
Table of Contents


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, management used the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control -Integrated Framework (2013). Based on such evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.2021.
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, misstatements, errors, and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been or will be prevented or detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls also can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks that internal controls may become inadequate as a result of changes in conditions, or through the deterioration of the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
KPMG LLP, ourOur independent registered public accounting firm KPMG LLP, issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is contained in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


82
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the first quarter of 2018, we implemented a new enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system. Accordingly, we modified the design and documentation of certain internal control processes and procedures relating to the new ERP system at that time. Other than the ERP and related systems implementation, there have beenThere was no changeschange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021 that has materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting due to COVID-19. We are continually monitoring and assessing the effects of COVID-19 on our internal controls to minimize the impact to their design and operating effectiveness.
Item 9B.Other Information
Item 9B.Other Information
None.None


Item 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
110
Not applicable

PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information called forrequired to be disclosed by this Item 10 required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K relating to Directors and Nominees for election to the Board of Directorsitem is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Proposal 1- Election of Directors” in our definitive Proxy Statementproxy statement for our 2018the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders (the "2022 Proxy Statement"), which we expect to be held on May 9, 2019, (the “Proxy Statement”). Information called for by this file with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Item 10 required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K concerning the Company’s executive officers appears in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.11.Executive Compensation
The information called forrequired to be disclosed by this Item 10 required by Item 405 of Regulation S-Kitem is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” under the heading “Other Information,” in the Proxy Statement.
The information called for by this Item 10 required by Item 406 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” under the heading “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement.
The information called for by this Item 10 required by Item 407(c)(3) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Governance Committee Process for Director Nominations” under the heading “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement.
The information called for by this Item 10 required by Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the heading entitled “The Board of Directors and its Committees” and in the section entitled “Audit Committee Report” under the heading entitled “Audit Committee Matters,” in the Proxy Statement.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The information called for by this Item 11 required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of theour 2022 Proxy Statement, appearing underwhich we expect to file with the heading “Executive Compensation,” includingSEC within 120 days after the sections entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Summary Compensation Table,” “Grantsend of Plan-Based Awards Table,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table,” “Pension Benefits,” “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” and the sections of the Proxy Statement appearing under the heading “Directors Compensation.”our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The information called for by this Item 11 required by Items 407(e)(4) and 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement appearing under the heading “Executive Compensation,” including the sections entitled “Compensation Committee Report” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.”
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information called forrequired to be disclosed by this Item 12 required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-Kitem is incorporated herein by reference to the section of theour 2022 Proxy Statement, entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information,” appearing underwhich we expect to file with the heading “Other Information.”SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The information called for by this Item 12 required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement appearing under the heading “Beneficial Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Persons Owning More Than Five Percent of Common Stock.”
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Omnibus AgreementItem 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The omnibus agreement with SunCoke and the Partnership's general partner addresses certain aspects of our relationship, including:
Business Opportunities. The Partnership has a preferential rightinformation required to invest in, acquire and construct cokemaking facilities in the U.S. and Canada. SunCoke has a preferential right to all other business opportunities. If the Partnership decides not to pursue an opportunity to construct a new cokemaking facility and SunCoke or any of its controlled affiliates undertake such construction, then upon completion of such construction, the Partnership will have the option to acquire such facility at a price sufficient to give SunCoke an internal rate of return on its invested capital equal to the sum of SunCoke’s weighted average cost of capital (as determined in good faith by SunCoke) and 6.0 percent. If the Partnership decides not to


111
Table of Contents


pursue an opportunity to invest in or acquire a cokemaking facility, SunCoke or any of its controlled affiliates may undertake such an investment or acquisition and if such acquisition is completed by SunCoke, the cokemaking facility so acquired will be subject to the right of first offer described below. If a business opportunity includes cokemaking facilities but such facilities represent a minority of the value of such business opportunity as determined by SunCoke in good faith, SunCoke will have a preferential right as to such business opportunity. These agreements as to business opportunities shall apply only so long as SunCoke controls the Partnership, and shall not apply with respect to any business opportunity SunCoke or any of its controlled affiliates was actively pursuing at the time of the closing of the Partnership's initial public offering on January 24, 2013 ("IPO").
Right of First Offer. If SunCoke or any of its controlled affiliates decides to sell, convey or otherwise transfer to a third-party a cokemaking facility located in the U.S. or Canada or an interest therein, the Partnership shall have a right of first offer as to such facility. SunCoke shall have the same right of first offer if the Partnership decides to sell, convey or otherwise transfer to a third-party any cokemaking facility or an interest therein. In the event a party decides to sell, convey or otherwise transfer a cokemaking facility, it will offer the other party, referred to as the ROFO Party, such facility with a proposed price for such assets. If the ROFO Party does not exercise its right, the seller shall have the right to complete the proposed transaction, on terms not materially more favorable to the buyer than the last written offer proposed during negotiations with the ROFO Party, with a third-party within 270 days. If the seller fails to complete such a transaction within 270 days, then the right of first offer is reinstated. This right of first offer shall apply only so long as SunCoke controls the Partnership.
Indemnity.SunCoke will indemnify the Partnership with respect to remediation arising from any environmental matter discovered and identified as requiring remediation prior to the contribution by SunCoke to the Partnership of an interest in the Haverhill, Middletown and Granite City (Gateway) cokemaking facilities, except for any liability or increase in liability resulting from changes in environmental regulations; provided, however, that, in each case, SunCoke will be deemed to have contributed in satisfaction of this obligation, as of the effective date of the contribution of an interest in these cokemaking facilities, the amount identified in the applicable contribution agreement as being reserved to pre-fund existing environmental remediation projects.
Post-closing. The Partnership will indemnify SunCoke for events relating to the Partnership's operations except to the extent that it is entitled to indemnification by SunCoke.
Tax Matters. SunCoke will fully indemnify the Partnership with respect to any tax liability arising prior to or in connection with the closing of its IPO.
Real Property. SunCoke will either cure or fully indemnify the Partnership for losses resulting from any material title defects at the properties owned by the entities in which the Partnership has acquired an interest from SunCoke, to the extent that such defects interfere with, or reasonably could be expected to interfere with, the operations of the related cokemaking facilities.
License. SunCoke has granted the Partnership a royalty-free license to use the name “SunCoke” and related marks. Additionally, SunCoke will grant the Partnership a non-exclusive right to use all of SunCoke’s current and future cokemaking and related technology. The Partnership has not paid and will not pay a separate license fee for the rights it receives under the license.
Expenses and Reimbursement. SunCoke will continue to provide the Partnership with certain general and administrative services, and the Partnership will reimburse SunCoke for all direct costs and expenses incurred on the Partnership's behalf and the portion of SunCoke’s corporate and other costs and expenses attributable to the Partnership's operations. Additionally, the Partnership has agreed to pay all fees (i) due under its revolving credit facility and/or existing senior notes; and (iii) in connection with any future financing arrangement entered into for the purpose of amending, modifying, or replacing its revolving credit facility or its senior notes.
The omnibus agreement can be amended by written agreement of all parties to the agreement. However, the Partnership may not agree to any amendment or modification that would, in the reasonable discretion of its general partner, be adverse in any material respect to the holders of its common units without prior approval of the conflicts committee. So long as SunCoke controls the Partnership's general partner, the omnibus agreement will remain in full force and effect unless mutually terminated by the parties. If SunCoke ceases to control the Partnership's general partner, the omnibus agreement will terminate, provided (i) the indemnification obligations described above and (ii) the Partnership's non-exclusive right to use all of SunCoke’s existing cokemaking and related technology will remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.


112
Table of Contents


Additional information called fordisclosed by this Item 13 required by Item 404 of Regulation S-Kitem is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of theour 2022 Proxy Statement, entitled “Transactionswhich we expect to file with Related Persons” under the heading “Governance Matters.”SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The information called for by this Item 14 required by Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Corporate Governance,” under the heading “Director Independence.”
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Our independent registered accounting firm is KPMG LLP, Chicago, IL, Auditor Firm ID: 185.
The information called forrequired to be disclosed by this Item 14 required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14Aitem is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of theour 2022 Proxy Statement, appearing underwhich we expect to file with the heading “Audit Committee Matters.”    






SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

83
113
Table of Contents


PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
1.1
Consolidated Financial Statements:
The consolidated financial statements are set forth under Item 8 of this report.
2.2
Financial Statements Schedules:
Financial statement schedules are omitted because required information is shown elsewhere in this report, is not necessary or is not applicable.
3.3
Exhibits:
2.1
Contribution Agreement, dated January 12, 2015, by and among SunCoal & SunCoke LLC, SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., SunCoke Energy, Inc. and agreed to for purposes of Section 2.9 thereof by Gateway Energy & Coke Company, LLC (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 13, 2015, File No. 001-35243)
2.3
2.2
2.3
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of February 4, 2019 by and among SunCoke Energy, Inc., SC Energy Acquisition LLC, SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., and SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC. (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 5, 2019, File No. 001-35243)
3.1
3.2
4.1
10.14.2
10.2
Omnibus Agreement, dated January 24, 2013, by and among SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 24, 2013, File No. 001-35243)
10.2.1
Amendment No. 1 to Omnibus Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2014, by and among SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 filed on October 28, 2014, File No. 001-35243)
10.2.2
Amendment No. 2 to Omnibus Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2015, by and among SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5.24.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 24, 2015,25, 2021, File No. 001-35243)
10.3**4.3
10.4**4.3.1
10.1
10.2
10.2.1
10.3*
10.4**


114
Table of Contents


84
Table of Contents
10.5**
10.5.1**


10.5.2**
10.5.3**
10.5.4**


10.5.510.5.5**


10.6*10.5.6**


10.6**


10.6.1

10.6.1**
10.7**


10.7.1**


10.7.2**




10.7.3**




10.810.7.4*
85
Table of Contents
10.8**
10.910.9**


115
Table of Contents


10.10**
10.11**
10.12**
10.13†
10.13.1†
10.13.2†


10.13.3†


10.14†

10.13.4†
10.14†
10.14.1†


86
Table of Contents
10.14.2†


10.14.3†


10.15†10.14.4
10.15†


116
Table of Contents


10.16†10.15.1†
10.15.2
10.16†
10.16.1†
10.16.2†
10.16.3†
10.16.4†
10.16.5†
87
Table of Contents
10.17†
10.17.1†
10.17.2
10.17.3†
10.18†
10.19
21.1*
23.1*22.1*
23.1*
24.1*
Powers of Attorney (filed herewith)


117
Table of Contents


31.1*24.1*
31.1*
31.2*
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1*
32.2*
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
95.1*
101.INS*101*XBRL Instance DocumentThe following financial statements from SunCoke Energy, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2022, formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
101.SCH*104*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentThe cover page from SunCoke Energy, Inc's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language) and contained in Exhibit 101.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
*Provided herewith.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
**
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*Provided herewith.
**Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
†Certain portions have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. Omitted information has been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Item 16.        Form 10-K Summary
None.

88
118
Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 15, 2019.24, 2022.
SUNCOKE ENERGY, INC.
By:/s/ Fay WestMichael G. Rippey
Fay West
Senior Vice Michael G. Rippey
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 15, 2019.
24, 2022.
SignatureTitle
/s/ Michael G. RippeyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Michael G. Rippey
SignatureTitle
/s/ Michael G. Rippey*Bonnie M. Edeus*
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Michael G. Rippey
/s/ Fay WestSenior Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Fay West
/s/ Allison S. Lausas*
Vice President, Finance and Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)
Allison S. LausasBonnie M. Edeus
/s/ Alvin Bledsoe*Arthur F. Anton*Director
Alvin Bledsoe
/s/ Susan Landahl*Director
Susan Landahl
/s/ Peter B. Hamilton*Director
Peter B. Hamilton
/s/ Robert A. Peiser*Director
Robert A. Peiser
/s/ John W. Rowe*Chairman of the Board
John W. RoweArthur F. Anton
/s/ James E. Sweetnam*Martha Z. Carnes*Director
James E. SweetnamMartha Z. Carnes
/s/ Ralph M. Della Ratta, Jr.*Director
Ralph M. Della Ratta
/s/ Susan Landahl*Director
Susan Landahl
/s/ Michael W. Lewis*Director
Michael W. Lewis
* Fay West,Michael G. Rippey, pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by the above officers and directors of SunCoke Energy, Inc. and filed with the SEC in Washington, D.C., hereby executes this Annual Report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the persons named above in the capacity set forth opposite his or her name.
/s/ Fay WestMichael G. RippeyFebruary 15, 201924, 2022
Fay WestMichael G. Rippey



11989