false2022FY0001527166P5YP3YP4YP5Yhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherComprehensiveIncomeLossNetOfTaxhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherComprehensiveIncomeLossNetOfTaxhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#RevenueNotFromContractWithCustomerhttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://www.carlyle.com/20221231#NetInvestmentGainsLossesOfConsolidatedFundshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseP5Yhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherNonoperatingIncomeExpense








UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172022
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission File Number: 001-35538
The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
45-2832612
Delaware
45-2832612
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C.
20004-2505
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC, 20004-2505
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(202) 729-5626
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Units representing limited partner interestsStockCGThe NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market
5.875% Series A Preferred Units4.625% Subordinated Notes due 2061 of Carlyle Finance L.L.C.CGABLThe NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Large accelerated filerýAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨  (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No    ý
The aggregate market value of the common unitsstock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20172022 was $1,788,459,848.$8,088,355,343.
The number of the Registrant’s shares of common units representing limited partner interestsstock outstanding as of February 9, 20188, 2023 was 100,473,514.364,219,014.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2023 annual meeting of the shareholders (the “2023 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated. The 2023 Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.


1







TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page
Page
ITEM 1.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9C.
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.
PART IV.
ITEM 15.
ITEM 16.

1







Forward-Looking Statements
This report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements related to our expectations regarding the performance of our business, our financial results, our liquidity and capital resources, contingencies, our distributionexpectations regarding the impact of COVID-19, our dividend policy, our expected future dividend policy, the anticipated benefits from converting to a corporation and other non-historical statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates” or the negative version of these words or other comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements including, but not limited to, those listed below and those described under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this report, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our periodic filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report and in our other periodic filings with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Summary of Risk Factors
    The following is only a summary of the principal risks that may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The following should be read in conjunction with the complete discussion of risk factors we face, which are set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Risks Related to Our Company
Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively impact our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise capital, any of which could materially reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.
The global pandemic of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economies and has impacted, and may continue to impact, our performance and results of operations.
Our use of leverage may expose us to substantial risks.
Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable, which makes it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis.
Given our focus on achieving superior investment performance and maintaining and strengthening investor relations, we may reduce our AUM, restrain its growth, reduce our fees or otherwise alter the terms under which we do business when we deem it in the best interest of our investors—even in circumstances where such actions might be contrary to the near-term interests of stockholders.
We depend on our senior Carlyle professionals, including our new Chief Executive Officer, and the loss of their services or investor confidence in such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Recruiting and retaining our professionals has become more difficult and may continue to be difficult in the future, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be successful in expanding into new investment strategies, markets and businesses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation
Laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, and data security worldwide may limit the use and adoption of our services and adversely affect our business.
Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties.
2


Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business.
Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.
Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders on ESG matters, including our ESG reporting, exposes us to reputational and other risks.
We are subject to substantial litigation risks and may face significant liabilities and damage to our professional reputation as a result of litigation allegations and negative publicity.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations
Risks Related to the Assets We Manage
The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive.
Poor performance of our investment funds would cause a decline in our revenue, income and cash flow, may obligate us to repay carried interest previously paid to us, and could adversely affect our ability to raise capital for future investment funds.
The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common stock.
Our asset management business depends in large part on our ability to raise capital from third-party investors. If we are unable to raise capital from third-party investors, we would be unable to collect management fees or deploy their capital into investments and potentially collect carried interest, which would materially reduce our revenue and cash flow and adversely affect our financial condition.
We have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to retail investors, which could expose us to new and greater levels of risk.
Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.
Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance and accrued performance allocations.
The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with investments by our investment funds may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment.
Changes in the debt financing markets or higher interest rates could negatively impact the ability of certain of our funds and their portfolio companies to obtain attractive financing or re-financing and could increase the cost of such financing if it is obtained, which could lead to lower-yielding investments and could potentially decrease our net income.
Our funds invest in relatively high-risk, illiquid assets, and we may fail to realize any profits from these activities for a considerable period of time or lose some or all of our principal investments.
Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the United States.
Certain of our fund investments may be concentrated in particular asset types or geographic regions, which could exacerbate any negative performance of those funds to the extent those concentrated investments perform poorly.
Our private equity funds’ performance, and our performance, has been and may in the future be adversely affected by the financial performance of our portfolio companies and the industries in which our funds invest.

Industry Risks Related to the Assets We Manage
Our real estate funds are subject to risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
Our energy business is involved in oil and gas investments (i.e., exploration, production, storage, transportation, logistics, refining, marketing, trading, petrochemicals, energy services and other opportunistic investments), which entail a high degree of risk.
Investments in the natural resources industry, including the infrastructure and power industries, involve various operational, construction and regulatory risks.
Our CLO business and investment into CLOs involves certain risks.
3


Investments in the insurance industry (including our investment in Fortitude) could be adversely impacted by insurance regulations and potential regulatory reforms.
Our Global Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may decline due to the large number of shares of common stock eligible for future sale.
Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.
Our founders have the right to designate members of our Board of Directors.
Our certificate of incorporation does not limit the ability of our former general partner, founders, directors, officers or stockholders to compete with us.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that stockholders might consider favorable.
Risks Related to Taxation
Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments (companies) or fund income.
U.S. and foreign tax regulations could adversely affect our ability to raise funds from certain foreign investors and increase compliance costs.
On January 1, 2020, we completed our conversion from a Delaware limited partnership named The Carlyle Group L.P. into a Delaware Corporation named The Carlyle Group Inc. Pursuant to the conversion, at the specified effective time on January 1, 2020, each common unit of The Carlyle Group L.P. outstanding immediately prior to the effective time converted into one share of common stock of The Carlyle Group Inc. and each special voting unit and general partner unit was canceled for no consideration. In addition, holders of the partnership units in Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P., and Carlyle Holdings III L.P. exchanged such units for an equivalent number of shares of common stock and certain other restructuring steps occurred (the conversion, together with such restructuring steps and related transactions, the “Conversion”).
Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this report to “Carlyle,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer (i) prior to the consummation of the Conversion to The Carlyle Group L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries and (ii) from and after the consummation of the Conversion to The Carlyle Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. When weReferences to our common stock or shares in periods prior to the Conversion refer to the “partnerscommon units of The Carlyle Group L.P.,” we are referring specifically to the common unitholders and our general partner and any others who may from time to time be partners of that specific Delaware limited partnership. When we refer to our “senior Carlyle professionals,” we are referring to the partner-level personnel of our firm. References in this report to the ownership of the senior Carlyle professionals include the ownership of personal planning vehicles of these individuals. When we refer to the “Carlyle Holdings partnerships” or “Carlyle Holdings”,Holdings,” we are referring to Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P., and Carlyle Holdings III L.P.

, which prior to the Conversion were the holding partnerships through which the Company and our senior Carlyle professionals and other holders of Carlyle Holdings partnership units owned their respective interests in our business.
“Carlyle funds,” “our funds” and “our investment funds” refer to the investment funds and vehicles advised by Carlyle.

“Carry funds” generally refers to closed-end investment vehicles, in which commitments are drawn down over a specified investment period, and in which the general partner receives a special residual allocation of income from limited partners, which we refer to as carried interest, in the event that specified investment returns are achieved by the fund. Disclosures referring to carry funds will also include the impact of certain commitments which do not earn carried interest, but are either part of, or associated with our carry funds. The rate of carried interest, as well as the share of carried interest allocated to Carlyle, may vary across the carry fund platform. Carry funds generally include the following investment vehicles across our fourthree business segments:
CorporateGlobal Private Equity (all): buyout &Equity: Buyout, middle market and growth funds advised by Carlyle
Real Assets: Realcapital, real estate, power, infrastructure and energynatural resources funds advised by Carlyle, as well as thosecertain energy funds advised by our strategic partner NGP Energy Capital Management (“NGP”) in which Carlyle is entitled to receive a share of carried interest (“NGP Carry Funds”)
Global Credit (formerly known as Global Market Strategies): DistressedCredit: Opportunistic credit, energy credit, opportunistic credit and corporate mezzanine funds,aircraft finance, and other closed-end credit funds advised by Carlyle
4


Global Investment Solutions: Funds and vehicles advised by AlpInvest Partners B.V. (“AlpInvest”) and Metropolitan Real Estate Equity Management, LLC (“Metropolitan), which include primary fund, secondary and portfolio financing, and co-investment strategies
Carry funds specifically exclude thosecertain legacy Abingworth funds advised by NGP Energy Capital Management in which Carlyle is not entitled to receive a share of carried interest, (or “NGP management fee funds”), collateralized loan obligation vehicles (“CLOs”), our business development companies and our former hedge fund platform.

associated managed accounts, as well as capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude (defined below) alongside a carry fund.
For an explanation of the fund acronyms used throughout this Annual Report, refer to “Item 1. Business-Our Family of Funds.Business–Our Global Investment Offerings.
“Fee-earning assets under management” or “Fee-earning AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise from which we derive recurring fund management fees. Our Fee-earning AUM is generally based on one of the following, once fees have been activated:
(a)the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired, for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period and for Metropolitan carry funds during the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds;
(b)the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co-investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired, Metropolitan carry funds after the expiration of the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds, and one of our business development companies;
(c)the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our CLOs, as defined in the fund indentures (typically exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date for each CLO;
(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of our hedge fund and fund of hedge funds vehicles (pre redemptions and subscriptions), as well as certain carry funds;
(e)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), excluding cash and cash equivalents, of one of our business development companies and certain carry funds; or
(f)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired.
(a)the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired and for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period;
(b)the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co-investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired, as well as one of our business development companies;
(c)the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our CLOs and other securitization vehicles, as defined in the fund indentures (typically exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date;
(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(e)the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement;
(f)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), excluding cash and cash equivalents, of one of our business development companies and certain carry funds; or
(g)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired.
“Assets under management” or “AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise. Our AUM equals the sum of the following:
(a) the aggregate fair value of our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, NGP management fee funds and separately managed accounts, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those funds and vehicles (including Carlyle commitments to those funds and vehicles and those of senior Carlyle professionals and employees) pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those funds and vehicles;
(b)the amount of aggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or aggregate principal amount of the notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions);
(c)the net asset value (pre-redemptions and subscriptions) of our long/short credit, emerging markets, multi-product macroeconomic, fund of hedge funds vehicles, mutual fund and other hedge funds; and
(d)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of our business development companies, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles.
(b)     the amount of aggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or aggregate principal amount of the notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions);
(c)     the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(d)        the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement; and
(d)     the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of our business development companies, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles.
We include in our calculation of AUM and Fee-earning AUM certain energy and renewable resources fundsthe Legacy Energy Funds (defined below) that we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (“Riverstone”) and certainthe NGP management fee funds and carry fundsCarry Funds that are advised by NGP. Our calculation of AUM also includes third-party capital raised for the investment in Fortitude through a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund and from a strategic investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside the fund. The total AUM and Fee-earning AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude is inclusive of the net asset value of
5


investments in Carlyle products. These amounts are also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested.
For most of our carry funds, total AUM includes the fair value of the capital invested whereas(among other elements as described above). Fee-earning AUM includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital, depending on whether the original investment period for the fund has expired.expired, which does not reflect any net appreciation in the value of capital invested by such carry funds. As such, Fee-earningtotal AUM may be greater than totalFee-earning AUM when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments is less thanexceeds the cost of those investments.
Our calculations of AUM and Fee-earning AUM may differ from the calculations of other alternative asset managers. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other alternative asset managers. In addition, our calculation of AUM (but not Fee-earning AUM) includes uncalled commitments to, and the fair value of invested capital in, our investment funds from Carlyle and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to management or performance fees. Our calculations of AUM or Fee-earning AUM are not based on any definition of AUM or Fee-earning AUM that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage or advise.

Vermillion”Perpetual Capital” refers to the assets we manage or advise which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors upon the realization of investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law. Perpetual Capital may be materially reduced or terminated under certain conditions, including reductions from changes in valuations and payments to investors, including through elections by investors to redeem their investments, dividend payments, and other payment obligations, as well as the termination of or failure to renew the respective investment advisory agreements. Perpetual Capital includes: (a) assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, (b) our commodities advisorCore Plus real estate fund, (c) our business development companies and business advised bycertain other direct lending products, and (d) our Interval Fund.
“Fortitude” refers to Fortitude Group Holdings, LLC (“Fortitude Holdings”) prior to October 1, 2021 and to FGH Parent, L.P. (“FGH Parent”) as of October 1, 2021. On October 1, 2021, the owners of Fortitude Holdings contributed their interests to FGH Parent such that FGH Parent became the direct parent of Fortitude Holdings. Fortitude Holdings owns 100% of the outstanding common shares of Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled reinsurer (“Fortitude Re”). See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the Company’s strategic investment in Fortitude.
“Legacy Energy Funds” include Energy III, Energy IV, and Renew II and are managed with Riverstone and its affiliates. Affiliates of both Carlyle Commodityand Riverstone act as investment advisers to each of the Legacy Energy Funds. Carlyle has a minority representation on the management committees of Energy IV and Renew II. Carlyle and Riverstone each hold half of the seats on the management committees of Energy III. The investment periods for these funds have expired and the remaining investments in each fund are being disposed of in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2022, the Legacy Energy Funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $0.2 billion in AUM and $0.4 billion in Fee-earning AUM. We are no longer raising capital for the Legacy Energy Funds and expect these balances to continue to decrease over time as the funds wind down.
“Metropolitan” or “MRE” refers to Metropolitan Real Estate Management, L.L.C.,LLC, which was formerly known as Vermillion Asset Management until August 2015. 



included in the Global Investment Solutions business segment prior to its sale on April 1, 2021.
2
6







PART I.
 
ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
Overview
We are one of the world’s largest    Carlyle is a global investment firm with deep industry expertise that deploys private capital across three business segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and most diversified multi-product global alternative asset management firms. We advise an array of specialized investment funds and other investment vehicles thatGlobal Investment Solutions. Our teams invest across a range of industries, geographies, asset classesstrategies that leverage our deep industry expertise, local insights, and investment strategies and seekglobal resources to deliver attractive returns for our fund investors.throughout an investment cycle. Since our firm was founded in Washington, D.C. in 1987, we have grown to become a leading global alternative asset manager with more than $195manage $373 billion in AUM across 317 investment vehicles as of December 31, 2017. We have2022. Our experienced and diverse team of more than 1,6002,100 employees including 654includes more than 770 investment professionals in 3129 offices across sixfive continents, and we serve more than 1,7502,900 active carry fund investors from 8388 countries. Across
    We seek to invest with a clarity of purpose, adaptability, and alignment between our Corporate Private Equity (“CPE”)interests and Real Assets segments, asthe interests of December 31, 2017, we had investments in 279 active portfolio companies that employ more than 650,000 people. In general, we have more investment professionals, offices, investment funds and investments across our platform than many of our peers. We have structured our firm in this manner to provide our fund investors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. We continue to execute against our strategy, with a more diverse product set tailored to individual investing decisions, and a broader global reach, but such structure increases our costs of doing business.
Forfocus on the past thirty years, our firm has been guided by several fundamental tenets:following priorities:
 
ExcellenceGrow our business. We pursue new opportunities, both organic and inorganic, that build on our strengths in Investing. Our primary goal isour three global business segments and further diversify our product offerings.
Scale our platform. We identify strategies and opportunities that enable us to invest wiselyfurther scale our business, often in adjacent opportunities, such as Capital Markets and create value forInsurance Solutions.

Drive efficiencies across our fund investors.business. We striveseek ways to generate superior investment returns by combining deep industry expertise, a global network of local investment teams who can leverage extensive firm-wide resources and a consistent and disciplined investment process.

Commitment to our Fund Investors. Our fund investors come first. This commitment is a core component of our firm culture and informs every aspect of our business. We believe this philosophy is in the long-term best interests of Carlyle and its owners, including our common unitholders.

Expansion of our Platform. We innovate continuously to expandoptimize our investment capabilities through the creation or acquisition of new asset-, sector- and regional-focused strategies in order to provide our fund investors a variety of investment options.

Investment in the Firm. We have invested, and intend to continue to invest, significant resources in hiring and retaining a deep talent pool of investment professionals and in creating an efficient global infrastructure to ensure that we are providing our investors with world-class investment expertise and the customized service they require.

Unified Culture. We seek to leverage the local market insights and operational capabilities that we have developed across our global platform through a unified culture we call “One Carlyle.” Our culture emphasizes collaboration and sharing of knowledge and expertise across the firm to create value. We believe our collaborative approach enhances our ability to analyze investments, deploy capital and improve the performance of our portfolio companies.
During 2017, we continued to work in furtherance of our fundamental tenetsprocess by focusing on investing wiselythe development of our people, continuous process improvement and driving asset appreciation to createunlocking the value forof our investors, making significant progress toward our goal of raising $100 billion in new capital commitments during our four-year fundraising plan that will end in 2019 and building a premier global credit platform.data.
Operational and strategic highlights for our firm for 20172022 include:
 
During 2017, we raised approximately $43 billion in new commitments across our platform, bringing the total gross commitments raised since 2016Assets under management grew 24% to $57 billion.

During 2017, we made investments through our carry funds of approximately $22 billion, a record level, and we realized proceeds of approximately $26 billion.

During 2017, the value of our carry fund portfolio increased by approximately 20%.


3






In October 2017, we appointed Kewsong Lee and Glenn Youngkin as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the firm, effective January 1, 2018. Carlyle’s three founders, William E. Conway, Jr., Daniel A. D’Aniello and David M. Rubenstein, will continue to remain actively involved in our business. Messrs. Conway and Rubenstein are now serving as Co-Executive Chairmen of the Board of Directors of our general partner and Mr. Conway is also serving as our Co-Chief Investment Officer. Mr. D’Aniello is serving as Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Directors of our general partner and all three of our founders continue to serve as members of our Executive Group. Peter Clare was also named as Co-Chief Investment Officer and is serving in such role alongside Mr. Conway. Mr. Clare also continues to serve as Co-head of our U.S. buyout team. Messrs. Clare, Lee and Youngkin also have joined the Board of Directors of our general partner and all three serve on our Executive Group.

On September 13, 2017, we issued 16 million 5.875% Series A Preferred Units at $25.00 a unit for total gross proceeds of $400 million that we will use for general corporate purposes.

We further aligned our interests with those of our fund investors as Carlyle, our senior Carlyle professionals, advisors and other professionals increased commitments to our investment funds by over $2.2 billion during the year for a total cumulative commitment of $11.9$373 billion as of December 31, 2017.

Each2022 from $301 billion as of December 31, 2021, and fee-earning assets under management increased 38% to $267 billion, reflecting fundraising of $29.9 billion, as well as the impact of the strategic transactions outlined below. Perpetual Capital products now comprise $58 billion, or 22%, of our segmentsfee-earning assets under management.
During 2022, we completed the following transactions with the goal of driving accretive growth on an inorganic basis:
In March 2022, we acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”), totaling $15 billion in assets under management which were integrated into our Global Credit platform.
In April 2022, we entered into a strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude to provide certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services. As of December 31, 2022, we had $46 billion of Perpetual Capital associated with the agreement, on which we earn a recurring management fee.
In August 2022, we acquired Abingworth, a life sciences investment firm, to expand our healthcare investment platform with the addition of nearly $2 billion in assets under management and a specialized team of over 20 investment professionals and advisors.
We invested $34.8 billion in our carry funds during 2022 and realized proceeds of $33.8 billion for our carry fund investors. Our net accrued performance revenues increased to $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2022 from $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2021, despite realizing $1.0 billion in realized net performance revenues during the year, driven by carry fund appreciation of 11%, which reflects the strength of our portfolio construction, as well as the value creation activities in our portfolio.
We remained focused on the professional development and the health and well-being of our employees in 2022. We continued to leverageroll out several leadership development programs and implemented a well-being strategy focused on enabling employees to foster emotional, physical, financial, environmental, and social well-being.
7


During 2022, with feedback received from employee surveys, we continued to reimagine our processes, office environment and business operations.
We continued to significantly enhance our ESG and DEI efforts:
We became a signatory of the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, and remain involved with several important industry initiatives in the field, including, among others, the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, the International Sustainability Standards Board Investor Advisory Group (IIAG), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) Global Responsible Investment Steering Committee, and the One Planet Private Equity Funds initiative.
We held a Sustainability Workshop in May 2022 that welcomed more than 60 guests from our portfolio companies and included sessions on developing resilient climate strategies and leading practices for employee engagement.
We continued to deepen the integration of ESG within our investment teams and portfolio companies, with ESG assessments included in most Carlyle platforminvestment decisions using proprietary due diligence tools in our GPE and Global Credit segments.
We invested in enhancing DEI through our second year of the DEI Incentive Awards program, where we granted approximately $2 million in awards to take advantage70 employees from around the globe who made an impact on DEI at Carlyle.

We launched the DEI Leadership Network, a coalition of economies of scale and we continue to work acrossportfolio company CEOs around the firmglobe to develop different productsa peer group for our fund investors.shared resources and insights that can help advance DEI within their respective companies.


Operational and strategic highlights for our fourthree global business segments for 20172022 include:

Global Private Equity (“GPE”):
During 2022, GPE invested $19.9 billion across the segment, including $14.5 billion in the Americas, $2.7 billion in Europe, and $2.7 billion in Asia.
Our GPE funds realized proceeds of $22.5 billion for our GPE carry fund investors in 2022, across a mix of trade-sales, public market block trades, recapitalizations, and dividends.
During 2022, we raised $10.6 billion in new capital commitments for our GPE funds, which included the launch of our fifth Europe technology fund (“CETP V”) and our second renewable energy fund (“CRSEF II”).
Global Credit:
In total, we raised $15.3 billion in new capital commitments to our Global Credit products during 2022, and doubled overall AUM to $146.3 billion, reflecting fundraising as well as the impact of the CBAM and Fortitude transactions on capital formation.
In our CLO business, we closed $2.7 billion of new CLOs in the U.S. and $1.2 billion of new CLOs in Europe during 2022. Including the impact of the CBAM transaction, we have $48.6 billion of total AUM across all of our CLOs at December 31, 2022, an increase in CLO AUM of 47% over 2021.
In Carlyle Aviation Partners, we completed the acquisition of AMCK Aviation’s portfolio of aircraft, including 145 narrow-body aircraft.
We had continued strength in direct lending, executing $3.9 billion of gross originations in 2022, which included originations from a newly launched evergreen fund (“CDLF”).
CPE:
8

CPE has many of its large buyout funds currently in the market, including our latest generation U.S. Buyout fund, European buyout fund and Asia buyout fund. During 2017, we raised $21 billion in new capital commitments for our CPE funds.

Despite a challenging environment for investing due to high asset prices and significant competition, CPE invested a record $11 billion in 2017 in, among others, ADB Safegate (a CEP IV portfolio company), Albany Molecular (a CP VI portfolio company), Arctic Glacier (a CGP portfolio company), Atotech (a CP VI, CEP IV and CAP IV portfolio company), Golden Goose Deluxe Brand (a CEP IV and CAGP V portfolio company), MedRisk (a CP VI portfolio company), Pharmaceutical Product Development (a CP VI portfolio company), The TCW Group, (a CGP portfolio company), WellDyneRx (a CP VI portfolio company), Wildhorse Resource Development Corporation (a CP VI and NGP portfolio company) and ZeroChaos (a CP VI portfolio company).

CPE realized proceeds of $11.2 billion for our CPE carry fund investors in 2017. We sold stakes or otherwise generated proceeds in, among others, Coates Hire Limited (a CAP II portfolio company), Dealogic (a CP VI portfolio company), ECi Software Solutions (a CEOF I portfolio company), Edgewood Partners Holdings (a CGFSP I and CGFSP II portfolio company), Focus Media (a CAP III portfolio company), Multi Packaging Solutions (a CEP III portfolio company), The Nature's Bounty Co. (a CP V and CEP III portfolio company), Pharmaceutical Product Development (a CP V portfolio company), The TCW Group (a CP V and CGFSP I portfolio company) and Tsubaki Nakashima Co. (a CJP II portfolio company).

Real Assets:

Our strategic partner, NGP Energy Capital Management ("NGP"), launched fundraising for its twelfth fund and we continued fundraising for our open-ended core-plus real estate fund, our new global infrastructure opportunities fund and our eighth opportunistic U.S. real estate fund. In total, we closed on approximately $10.2 billion in new commitments to our Real Assets segment during 2017.

During 2017, we invested $4.4 billion in our Real Assets segment. Of this amount, we invested approximately $2 billion to acquire or develop real estate properties, primarily in the U.S. across multiple sectors, including multifamily, commercial, senior living and for-sale residential properties. Our international energy team was particularly active during the year investing approximately $700

4







Global Investment Solutions:
million. We also invested in oil and gas transactions and power generating facilities in the United States. In total, our natural resources platform invested $2.3During 2022, we raised $4.0 billion in 2017. We or NGP madecapital commitments, including over $3.5 billion in capital commitments to separately managed accounts, and deployed $6.6 billion in investments in, among others, Assala Energy (a CIEP Iacross our Global Investment Solutions platform. Our portfolio company), Camino Natural Resources (an NGP XIappreciated 6% (4% excluding the positive impact of foreign currency translation) during the year and NGP XII portfolio company), Castell Oil Company (an NGP XI portfolio company), COG Energy (a CIEP I portfolio company), Lincoln Power, LLC (a CPP II portfolio company), NGP Vantage Energy (a NGP XI portfolio company), Titus Oil and Gas (an NGP XI portfolio company) and Mallard Exploration (a NGP XII portfolio company). Our European real estate team was also active in 2017 and focused on investments through four platforms: a co-working platform in London, a residential platform in Berlin, a French logistics platform and an Italian logistics platform.

We realized proceeds of approximately $4.6we realized proceeds of $7.2 billion for our Real Assets carry fund investors in 2017 and exited (fully or partially) a number of assets, including, among others, 71 Smith Street (a CRP IV portfolio company), ITS Technologies and Logistics (a CIP portfolio company), Pattern Energy Group (a Renew II portfolio company), Red Oak Power Holdings (a CIP and CPP portfolio company), Riverside (a CRP VI portfolio company), Talen Energy Corporation (an Energy III and Renew II portfolio company), Terraform Power (a Renew II portfolio company) and Varo Energy (a CIEP I portfolio company).

Our international energy team formed Regalwood Global Energy, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that will be investing in oil and gas assets. In December 2017, the SPAC closed its initial public offering of 30 million units at $10 per unit and is actively seeking investments.

Global Credit (formerly known as Global Market Strategies):

We closed our fourth-generation distressed credit fund at $2.5 billion, closed our structured credit fund at more than $800 million, and raised approximately $750 million for our inaugural credit opportunities fund. We also continued fundraising for our direct lending platform across multiple vehicles, including two business development companies (BDCs). We closed four new collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) in the U.S. and three new CLOs in Europe in 2017, with $20.2 billion of AUM across all of our CLOs at December 31, 2017. In total, we raised more than $6.6 billion in new capital commitments for our Global Credit funds during 2017.

TCG BDC Inc., the largest vehicle in our direct lending platform, was successfully listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market in June 2017, in what was the largest initial public offering ever in its sector.

Investment Solutions: investors.

During 2017, we deployed $4.4 billion in investments across our platform. We finalized our fundraising for our sixth AlpInvest secondaries program and our seventh AlpInvest co-investment program and successfully raised over $9 billion for these two strategies including amounts reserved for managed accounts. We also began to deploy capital out of both of these strategies during the year.

We signed 11 new managed accounts, finished investing our first real estate secondaries fund and launched our second Metropolitan Real Estate secondaries fund. We also launched a new platform through AlpInvest focused on investments in general partners. This platform seeks to invest directly in middle market general partners globally.

Our exit activity in our Investment Solutions segment was robust this year, realizing proceeds of $9.6 billion for our Investment Solutions investors.
Business Segments
We operate our business across fourthree segments: (1) CPE,Global Private Equity, (2) Real Assets, (3) Global Credit and (4)(3) Global Investment Solutions. Information about our segments should be read together with “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Although our corporate headquarters is based in the United States and a significant amount of our revenues are generated domestically, we have established investment vehicles whose primary focus is making investments in specified

5






geographical locations. Refer to “Information by Geographic Location” in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on consolidated revenues and assets based on the geographical focus of the associated investment vehicle.
CorporateGlobal Private Equity
Our CPEGPE segment established in 1990 with our first U.S. buyout fund, advises our buyout, growth, real estate, infrastructure and growth capitalnatural resources funds. Across our GPE funds, as of December 31, 2022, we had investments in more than 300 active portfolio companies that pursue a wide variety of corporate investments of different sizes and growth potentials.employ more than 1.3 million people around the world. Our 33 active CPE funds are each carry funds. They are organized and operated by geography or industry and are advised by separate teams of local professionals who live and work in the markets where they invest. In our CPE segment we also have 57 active external co-investment entities. We believe this diversity of funds and entities allows us to deploy more targeted and specialized investment expertise and strategies and offers our fund investors the ability to tailor their investment choices.
Our CPEGPE teams have two primarythe following areas of focus:
Buyout Funds.Corporate Private Equity. Our buyoutcorporate private equity teams advise a diverse group of 23 active funds that invest in transactions that focus either on a particular geography (e.g., United States, Europe, Asia, Japan, MENA, Sub-Saharan Africa or South America) or a particular industry, (e.g., financial services). In general, we expect the next generation of our largestrategy. Our buyout funds to be meaningfully larger than their predecessor funds. In 2017, we held first closings for our seventh U.S. buyout fund, our fifth Asia buyout fundfocus on corporate buyouts and our third global financial services fund. We invested $10.3 billion in new and follow-on investments through our buyout funds. As of December 31, 2017, our buyout funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $66.5 billion in AUM.

Growth Capital Funds. Our 10 active growth capital funds are advised by four regionally-focused teams in the United States, Europe and Asia, with each team generally focused on middle-market and growth companies consistent with specific regional investment considerations.strategic minority investments. The investment mandate for our growth capital funds is to seek out companies with the potential for growth, strategic redirectiondisruptive growth. Our core strategy seeks longer duration private equity opportunities, targeting stable businesses with sustainable market leadership, which have opportunities for operational improvement. Our corporate private equity funds are advised by teams of local professionals who live and operational improvements. These funds typically do not investwork in early stage or venture-type investments. Wethe markets where they invest. In 2022, we invested $0.8$12.8 billion in new and follow-on investments through our growth capitalcorporate private equity funds. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our growth capitalcorporate private equity funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $6.0$105.4 billion in AUM.
From inception through December 31, 2017, our CPE segment has invested approximately $87 billion in 601 investments. OfReal Estate. Our real estate team advises real estate funds that total, we have invested 59% in 293 investments in North and South America, 23% in 144 investments in Europe, the Middle East and Africa and 18% in 164 investmentsinvest in the Asia-Pacific region. WeU.S. and Europe, with a focus on a broad range of opportunities including residential properties, senior living facilities, industrial properties, and self-storage properties, but have fully realized 423 of these investments, meaning thatlimited our funds have completely exited, and no longer own an interest in, those investments.
The following table presents certain data about our CPE segment as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in billions; amounts invested include co-investments).
AUM 
% of Total
AUM
 
Fee-earning
AUM
 
Active
Investments
 
Active
Funds
 
Available
Capital
 
Investment
Professionals
 
Amount Invested
Since Inception
 
Investments Since
Inception
$73 37% $36 178 33 $30 308 $87 601
Real Assets
Our Real Assets segment, established in 1997 with our first U.S. real estate fund, advises our 29 active carry funds focused on real estate, infrastructure and energy and natural resources (including power) and also includes the five NGP management fee funds and four carry funds that are advised by NGP. This segment pursues investment opportunities across a diverse array of tangible assets, such asexposure to office buildings, hotels and retail and residential properties, industrial properties and senior living facilities, as well as oil and gas exploration and production, midstream, refining and marketing, power generation, pipelines, wind farms, refineries, airports, toll roads, transportation, water utility and agriculture, as well as the companies providing services or otherwise related to them.

6






properties. Our Real Assets teams have two primary areas of focus:
Real Estate. Our eleven active real estate funds pursue real estate investment opportunities in Asia, Europe and the United States and generally focus on acquiring single-property assets rather than large-cap companies with real estate portfolios. Our team of 115 real estate investment professionals hasportfolios and made more than 8501,450 investments in 397 cities/more than 700 cities or metropolitan statistical areas around the world as offrom inception through December 31, 2017, including office buildings, hotels, retail and residential properties, industrial properties, warehouse and logistic assets and senior living facilities. In 2017, we held a first close on our eighth opportunistic U.S. real estate fund and closed a series of coinvestment transactions in our European real estate business.2022. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our real estate funds had,managed, in the aggregate, approximately $18.3$30.3 billion in AUM.

Energy andInfrastructure & Natural Resources. Our energyactive infrastructure and natural resources funds focus on infrastructure and energy investing. Our infrastructure business is comprised of teams that invest in six primary sectors: renewables, energy infrastructure, water and waste, transportation, digital infrastructure, and power generation. Our energy activities focus on buyouts, growth capital investments and strategic joint ventures in the midstream, upstream, downstream, energy and oilfield services sectors the renewable and alternative sectors and the power and infrastructure industries around the world. Historically, we conducted ourOur international energy investing activities jointly with Riverstone, co-advising four funds with approximately $5.2 billion in AUM asinvestment team focuses on investments across the energy value chain outside of December 31, 2017 (we refer to these energy funds as our “Legacy Energy funds”). Currently, weNorth America. We conduct our North American energy investing through our partnership withstrategic investment in NGP, an Irving,a Texas-based energy investor. As of December 31, 2022, we managed $27.3 billion in AUM through our infrastructure and natural resources funds.
The following table presents certain data about our Global Private Equity segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).
AUM(1)
% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Active
Investments
Active
Funds(3)
Available
Capital
Investment
Professionals(2)
Amount Invested
Since Inception
Investments Since
Inception
$16344%$10886871$39442$2162,436
9


(1)Total AUM includes NGP, which advises nineseven funds with more than $13.0$12.7 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2017.2022. Through our strategic partnership with NGP, we are entitled to 55% of the management fee-related revenue of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP management fee funds,Energy Funds, and an allocation of income related to the carried interest received by suchthe fund general partners.partners of the NGP Carry Funds.
(2)Total GPE investment professionals excludes NGP employees.
(3)Active GPE funds includes seven NGP Carry Funds advised by NGP. We do not control NGP, and we do not serve as an investment adviser to the NGP funds.
Global Credit
    Our power team focuses on investment opportunities in the North American power generation sector. As of December 31, 2017, the power team managed approximately $2.0Global Credit segment, which had $146.3 billion in AUM through two funds. Our international energy investment team focuses on investments across the energy value chain outside of North America. As of December 31, 2017, the international energy team managed approximately $3.6 billion in AUM through one fund. In 2017, we held our first closing for our global infrastructure fund focused on infrastructure assets business and investments in global developed markets. As of December 31, 2017, the global infrastructure team managed more than $0.8 billion in AUM through two funds. We have also invested previously in North American infrastructure companies and assets.
Our Real Assets carry funds, including Carlyle-advised co-investment vehicles, have, from inception through December 31, 2017, invested on a global basis more than $49 billion in 1,039 investments, including nearly 200 portfolio companies. Of that total, we have invested 79% in 869 investments in North and South America, 16% in 120 investments in Europe, the Middle East and Africa and 5% in 50 investments in the Asia-Pacific region. We have fully realized 636 of these investments, meaning that our funds have completely exited, and no longer own an interest in, those investments.
The following table presents certain data about our Real Assets segmentunder management as of December 31, 2017 (dollar amounts in billions; amounts invested include co-investments).
AUM 
% of Total
AUM
 
Fee-earning
AUM
 
Active
Investments (2)
 
Active
Funds (3)
 
Available
Capital
 
Investment
Professionals (1)
 
Amount Invested
Since Inception(2)
 
Investments Since
Inception(2)
$43 22% $32 403 29 $17 144 $49 1,039
(1)Excludes NGP and Riverstone employees.
(2)Excludes investment activity of the NGP management fee funds.
(3)Includes the five NGP management fee funds and four carry funds advised by NGP.
Global Credit
Our Global Credit segment, established in 1999 with our first high yield fund,2022, advises a group of 58 active fundsproducts that pursue investment strategies including loans & structuredacross the credit direct lending, opportunisticspectrum, including: liquid credit, energyilliquid credit, and distressed credit. In 2017, we hired several new seniorreal assets credit, as well as platform initiatives such as Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund (“CTAC,” or the “Interval Fund”). Global Credit, which also includes our Insurance Solutions and Global Capital Markets businesses, has been Carlyle’s fastest-growing segment in the past four years, with total AUM nearly doubling in 2022 alone. Since our establishment in 1999, these various capital sources provide the opportunity for Carlyle to offer highly customizable and creative financing solutions to borrowers to meet their specific capital needs. Carlyle draws on the expertise and underwriting capabilities of our 233 investment professionals and leverages the resources and industry expertise of Carlyle’s global network to expand Global Credit's investment breadth and geographical presence, including a new head of the opportunistic credit strategy. In early 2018, we rebranded our Global Market Strategies business to "Global Credit" to better align the name of the business segment with its investment focus. We plan to pursue new initiatives from our Global Credit platform that will continue to expand our capabilities in credit.provide creative solutions for borrowers.
    

7






Primary areas of focus for our Global Credit platform include:
Liquid Credit
Loans and Structured Credit. Our structured credit funds invest primarily in performing senior secured bank loans through structured vehiclesCLOs and other investment vehicles. In 2017,2022, in addition to our acquisition of the management contracts on the CBAM portfolio, we closed foursix new U.S. CLOs and three CLOs in Europe with a totalan aggregate size of $2.4$2.7 billion and $1.5$1.2 billion, respectively, of AUM at December 31, 2017.respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our loans and structured credit team advised 46 structured credit funds and two carry funds in the United States, Europe and Asia totaling in the aggregate, approximately $21.6$50.4 billion in AUM.

Illiquid Credit
Direct Lending. Our direct lending business includes our business development companies (“BDCs”) that invest primarily in middle market first-lien loans (which include unitranche, "first out"“first out” and "last out"“last out” loans) and second-lien loans of middle-market companies, typically defined as companies with annual EBITDA ranging from $10$25 million to $100 million, that lack access to the broadly syndicated loan and bond markets. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our direct lending investment team advised four funds consisting of two BDCs, a CLO and one corporate mezzanine fund,AUM totaling in the aggregate, more than $2.9 billion in AUM.
$9.4 billion.

Opportunistic Credit. Our opportunistic credit team invests primarily in highly-structured and privately-negotiated capital solutions supporting corporate borrowers through secured loans, senior subordinated debt, mezzanine debt, convertible notes, and other debt likedebt-like instruments, as well as preferred and common equity in such borrowers.equity. The team will also look to invest in special situations (i.e., event-driven opportunities that exhibit hybrid credit and equity features) as well as market dislocations (i.e., primary and secondary market investments in liquid debt instruments that arise as a result of temporary market volatility). As of December 31, 2017, our opportunistic credit team advised one fund totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $0.8 billion in AUM.

Energy Credit. Our Energy credit team invests primarily in privately-negotiated mezzanine debt investments in North American energy and power projects and companies. As of December 31, 2017, our energy credit team advised two funds with approximately $4.7 billion in AUM.

Distressed Credit. Our distressed credit funds generally invest in liquid and illiquid securities and obligations, including secured debt, senior and subordinated unsecured debt, convertible debt obligations, preferred stock and public and private equity of financially distressed companies in defensive and asset-rich industries. In certain investments, our funds may seek to restructure pre-reorganization debt claims into controlling positions in the equity of the reorganized companies. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our distressedopportunistic credit team advised threeproducts totaling $12.8 billion in AUM.
Real Assets Credit
Aircraft Finance. Carlyle Aviation Partners is our multi-strategy investment platform that is engaged in commercial aviation aircraft financing and investment throughout the commercial aviation industry. As of December 31, 2022, Carlyle Aviation Partners had approximately $11.5 billion in AUM across carry funds, totaling,securitization vehicles, liquid strategies, and other vehicles.
Infrastructure Debt. Our Infrastructure debt team invests primarily in directly originated and privately negotiated debt instruments related to global infrastructure projects, primarily in the aggregate, more than $3.4power, energy, transportation, water/waste, telecommunications and social infrastructure sectors. The team focuses primarily on senior, subordinated, and mezzanine debt and seeks to invest primarily in developed markets within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”). As of December 31, 2022, our infrastructure debt team managed $3.7 billion in AUM.
10



Other Credit
Platform Initiatives. Our platform initiatives include CTAC, our closed-end interval fund which invests across Carlyle’s entire credit platform, as well as cross-platform separately managed accounts which are tailored to invest across Carlyle’s credit platform based on the specific investment needs of individual investors. These products also include structured solutions which focus on private, primarily investment-grade investments, backed by assets with contractual cash flows. As of December 31, 2022, the Global Credit platform initiatives represented $6.1 billion in AUM.
Insurance Solutions. Carlyle Insurance Solutions (“CIS”) combines our deep insurance expertise with portfolio construction capabilities, capital sourcing and asset origination strengths to provide comprehensive liability funding and reinsurance, asset management and advisory solutions for (re)insurance companies and fund investors. The CIS team oversees the investment in Fortitude, as well as the strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude. As of December 31, 2022, AUM related to capital raised from third-party investors to acquire a controlling interest in Fortitude was $5.7 billion. As of December 31, 2022, AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement was $45.2 billion, including the net asset value of investments in Carlyle products, which is also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested. Fortitude and certain Fortitude reinsurance counterparties have committed approximately $9.2 billion of capital to-date to various Carlyle strategies.
Global Capital Markets. Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) is a loan syndication and capital markets business that launched in 2018. The primary focus of GCM is to arrange, place, underwrite, originate and syndicate loans and underwrite securities of third parties and Carlyle portfolio companies through TCG Capital Markets and TCG Senior Funding. TCG Capital Markets is a FINRA registered broker dealer. GCM may also act as the initial purchaser of such loans and securities. GCM receives fees, including underwriting, placement, structuring, transaction and syndication fees, commissions, underwriting and original issue discounts, interest payments and other compensation, which may be payable in cash or securities or loans, in respect of the activities described above and may elect to waive such fees.
The following table presents certain data about our Global Credit segment as of December 31, 20172022 (dollar amounts in billions).
AUM% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Active
Funds
Investment
Professionals
$14639%$121122233
 
AUM 
% of Total
AUM
 
Fee-earning
AUM
 
Active
Funds
 
Investment
Professionals
$33 17% $27 58 109
Global Investment Solutions
    
Investment Solutions
Our Global Investment Solutions segment, established in 2011, provides comprehensive investment opportunities and resources for our investors and clients to build private equity and real estate portfolios through fund of funds, secondary purchases or financings of existing portfolios and managed co-investment programs. Global Investment Solutions executes these activities through AlpInvest, one of the world’s largest investors in private equity, and Metropolitan, one of the largest managers of indirect investments in global real estate.equity.
The primary areas of focus for our Global Investment Solutions teams include:

Private Equity FundSecondary and Portfolio Finance Investments. Our fund of funds vehicles advised Funds managed by AlpInvest makebuild an investment portfolio of private equity owned assets through the acquisition of limited partnership interests in the secondary market and other types of transactions such as fund recapitalizations, portfolio restructurings and spin-outs, and portfolio financings. Private equity investors who desire to sell or restructure their pre-existing investment commitments directly to buyout, growth capital, venturea fund may negotiate to sell the fund interests to AlpInvest. In this manner, AlpInvest’s secondary and other alternative asset funds advised by other general partners (“portfolio funds”).finance investments team provides the full range of liquidity and restructuring solutions from debt to equity for third-party private equity investors. As of December 31, 2017, AlpInvest advised 67 vehicles totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $24.92022, our secondary and portfolio finance investments program totaled $21.0 billion in AUM.


Private Equity Co-investments. AlpInvest invests alongside other private equity and mezzanine funds in which it or certain AlpInvest limited partners typically has a primary fund investment throughout Europe, North America and Asia. These investments are generally made when an investment opportunity is too large for a particular fund and the sponsor of the fund

8






therefore seeks to raise additional “co-investment” capital from sources such as AlpInvest. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our co-investment programs were conducted through 49 vehicles totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $8.4totaled $17.2 billion in AUM.

11



Private Equity SecondaryFund Investments. Funds managed Our fund of funds vehicles advised by AlpInvest acquire limited partnership interests in the secondary market. Private equity investors who desire to sell or restructure their pre-existingmake investment commitments directly to a fund may negotiate to sell the fund interests to AlpInvest. In this manner, AlpInvest’s secondary investments team provides liquiditybuyout, growth capital, venture and restructuring alternatives for third-party private equity investors.other alternative asset funds advised by other general partners. As of December 31, 2017, our secondary investments program was conducted through 50 vehicles totaling, in the aggregate, more than $11.22022, AlpInvest advised $25.1 billion in AUM.
AUM in private equity fund investments.

Real Estate Funds of Funds and Co-Secondary Investments. The principal strategic focus in our real estate funds is on value add/opportunistic real estate investments through direct commitments to 90 highly-focused, specialist real estate managers across the globe. As of December 31, 2017, we advised 31 real estate vehicles with approximately $1.8 billion in AUM. We also focus on real estate secondaries and co-investments.
The following table presents certain data about our Global Investment Solutions segment as of December 31, 20172022 (dollar amounts in billions). See “— Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds — Incentive Arrangements/Fee Structure” in this Item 1 for a discussion of the
AUM(1)
% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Fund 
Vehicles
Available
Capital
Investment
Professionals
Amount Invested
Since Inception
$6317%$38350$2096$87
(1)Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, regarding the allocation ofwe generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments of and the historical and certain future commitments to our AlpInvest carry fund vehicles.vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15% or, in some cases, 40% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).

AUM(1) 
% of Total
AUM
 
Fee-earning
AUM
 
Fund 
Vehicles
 
Available
Capital
 
Investment
Professionals
 
Amount Invested
Since Inception
$46 24% $30 197 $16 86 $67
(1)Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to our AlpInvest carry fund vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).

Investment Approach
CorporateGlobal Private Equity
The investment approach of our CPEGPE teams is generally characterized as follows:
 
Consistent and Disciplined Investment Process. We believe our successful investment track record is the result, in part, of a consistent and disciplined application of our investment process. Investment opportunities for our CPEGPE funds are initially sourced and evaluated by one or more of our deal teams. Deal teams consistently strive to be creative and look for deals in which we can leverage Carlyle'sCarlyle’s competitive advantages, sector experience and the global One Carlyle platform. The due diligence and transaction review process places a special emphasis on, as appropriate and among other considerations, the reputation of a target company’s shareholders and management, the company’s or asset’s size and sensitivity of cash flow generation, the business sector and competitive risks, the portfolio fit, exit risks and other key factors specific to a particular investment. In evaluating each deal, we consider what expertise or experience (i.e., the “Carlyle Edge”) we can bring to the transaction to enhance value for our investors. Each investment opportunity must secure approval from the investment committee of the applicable investment fund to move forward. To help ensure consistency, we utilize a standard investment committee process across our corporate private equityGPE funds, although NGP follows its own policies and procedures with respect to its advised funds. The investment committee approval process involves a detailed review of the transaction and investment thesis, business, risk factors and diligence issues, as well as financial models.

Distinctive Portfolio Construction Principles. We seek to proactively manage the construction of our portfolios through deliberate and thoughtful diversification across industries, geographies and cycles, and to avoid certain assets facing economic or industry headwinds. For example, our real estate portfolios have relatively little current exposure to commercial office properties, business hotels and retail properties.

Geographic- and Industry-Focused. We have developed a global network of local investment teams with deep local insight into the areas in which they invest and have adopted an industry-focused approach to investing. Our extensive network of global investment professionals has the knowledge, experience and relationships on a local level that allowallows them to identify and take advantage of opportunities that may be unavailable to firms that do not have our global reach and resources. We believe that our global platform helps enhance all stages of the investment process, including by facilitating faster and more effective diligence, a deeper understanding of global

9






industry trends and priority access to the capital markets. We have particular industry expertise in aerospace defense and government services, consumer, media and retail, financial services, healthcare, industrial, telecom, mediaindustrials, technology, real estate, natural resources and technology and transportation.infrastructure. As a result, we believe that our in-depth knowledge of specific industries improves our ability to source and create transactions, conduct effective and more informed due diligence, develop strong relationships with management teams and use contacts and relationships within these industries to drive value creation.


Variable Deal Sizes and Creative Structures. We believe that having the resources to complete investments of varying sizes provides us with the ability to enhance investment returns while providing for prudent industry,
12


geographic and size diversification. Our teams are staffed not only to effectively pursue large transactions, but also other transactions of varying sizes. We often invest in smaller companies or single real estate transactions and this has allowed us to obtain greater diversity across our entire portfolio. Additionally, we may undertake large, strategic minority investments with certain control elements or private investment in public equity (PIPE) transactions in large companies with a clear exit strategy. In certain jurisdictions around the world, we may make investments with little or no debt financing and seek alternative structures to opportunistically pursue transactions. We generally seek to obtain board representation and typically appoint our investment professionals and advisors to represent us on the boards of the companies in which we invest. Where our funds, either alone or as part of a consortium, are not the controlling investor, we typically, subject to applicable regulatory requirements, acquire significant voting and other control rights with a view to securing influence over the conduct of the business.


Driving Value Creation. Our CPEGPE teams seek to make investments in portfolio companies and assets in which our particular strengths and resources may be employed to their best advantage. Typically, as part of a CPEGPE investment, our investment teams will prepare and execute a systematic value creation plan that is developed during a thorough due diligence effort and draws on the deep resources available across our global platform, specifically relying on:

Reach: Our global team and global presence enables us to support international expansion efforts and global supply chain initiatives.

Expertise: Our deep bench of investment professionals and industry specialists provide extensive sector-specific knowledge and local market expertise.

Insight: We engage approximately 30 operating executives as independent consultants to work with our investment teams during due diligence, provide board-level governance and support and advise our portfolio company CEOs. These operating executives are former CEOs and other high-level executives of some of the world’s most successful corporations and currently sit on the boards of directors of a diverse mix of companies. We use this collective group of operating executives to provide special expertise to support specific value creation initiatives.

Data: The goal of our research function is to extract as much information as possible from our portfolio about the current state of the economy and its likely evolution over the near-to-medium term. Our CPE investment portfolio includes over 175 active portfolio companies as of December 31, 2017, across a diverse range of industries and geographies that each generate multiple data points (e.g., orders, shipments, production volumes, occupancy rates, bookings). By evaluating these data on a systematic basis, we work to identify the data with the highest correlation with macroeconomic data and map observed movements in the portfolio to anticipated variation in the economy, including changes in growth rates across industries and geographies. We incorporate this proprietary data into our investment portfolio management strategy and exit decisions on an ongoing basis. We believe this robust data gives us an advantage over our peers who do not have as large of a global reach.

Information Technology Resources: Carlyle has established an Information Technology (“IT”) capability that contributes to due diligence, portfolio company strategy and portfolio company operations. The capability includes dedicated information technology and business process resources, including assistance with portfolio company risk assessments and enhanced deal analytics.

Pursuing Best Exit Alternatives. In determining when to exit an investment, our private equity teams consider whether a portfolio company has achieved its objectives, the financial returns and the appropriate timing in industry cycles and company development to strive for the optimal value. The fund’s investment committee approves all exit decisions.


10Reach. Our global team and global presence enables us to support international expansion of our operating companies’ efforts and global supply chain initiatives.







Real Assets
Expertise.Our Real Assets business includes investments in real estate assets,deep bench of investment professionals and industry specialists provide extensive sector-specific knowledge and local market expertise. Our investment teams benefit from best-in-class support services and infrastructure provided through the global Carlyle organization. Carlyle’s overall infrastructure and energysupport services cover the full range of administrative functions, including fund management, accounting, legal and naturalcompliance, human resources, (including power) companiesinformation technology, tax, and projects. The investment approach of the teams advising the international energy, power and infrastructure funds is similarexternal affairs. Additionally, where appropriate we may seek to that ofpartner with third parties whose sector or market expertise may enhance our CPE funds.
Generally, the investment approach of our real estate teams is characterized as follows:
Pursue Single Asset Transactions. In general,value creation in an investment. For example, in our U.S. real estate funds have focused on single asset transactions. We follow this approach in the U.S. because we believe that pursuing single assets enables us to better understand the factors that contribute to the fundamental value of each property, mitigate concentration risk, establish appropriate asset-by-asset capital structures and maintain governance over major property-level decisions. In addition, the direct ownership of assets typically enables us to effectively employ an active asset management approach and reduce financing and operating risk, while increasing the visibility of factors that affect the overall returns of the investment. In the U.S., we plan to continue to focus on single asset transactions in both our opportunistic and core plus investment strategies. Outside the U.S., we continue to opportunistically invest in the Asia and European markets.

Seek out Strong Joint Venture Partners or Managers. Where appropriate, we seek outmay partner with joint venture partners or managers with significant operational expertise and/or deal sourcing capability. For each joint venture,capabilities.

Insights. To supplement our investment expertise, we design structureshave retained a group of more than 51 operating executives and termsadvisors as independent consultants to align interestswork with our investment teams, provide board-level governance and provide situationally appropriate incentives, often including, for example, the subordinationsupport and advise our portfolio companies. These operating executives and advisors are typically former CEOs and other high-level executives of some of the joint venture partner’s equityworld’s most successful corporations and profits interest to thatcurrently sit on the boards of directors of a fund, giveback provisions and/diverse mix of companies. Operating executives and advisors are independent consultants and are not Carlyle employees. Operating executives and advisors are often engaged by Carlyle primarily to assist with deal sourcing, due diligence and market intelligence. Operating executives and advisors may also be engaged and compensated by our portfolio companies as directors or profits escrow accountsto otherwise advise portfolio company management.

Data. The goal of our research function is to extract as much information as possible from our portfolio about the current state of the economy and its likely evolution over the near-to-medium term. Our corporate private equity investment portfolio includes 214 active corporate investments as of December 31, 2022, across a diverse range of industries and geographies that each generate multiple data points (e.g., orders, shipments, production volumes, occupancy rates, bookings). By evaluating this data on a systematic basis, we work to identify the data with the highest correlation with macroeconomic data and map observed movements in favorthe portfolio to anticipated variation in the economy, including changes in growth rates across industries and geographies. We incorporate this proprietary data into our investment portfolio management strategy and exit decisions on an ongoing basis. We believe this robust data gives us an advantage over our peers who do not have as large of a fundglobal reach.
Talent and exclusivity. We also typically structure positions with control or veto rights over major decisions.
Organization Performance. Our investment professionals work to enhance leadership and organizational effectiveness through proprietary and third-party data-driven assessments, best-practice playbooks, and knowledge-sharing forums.

Source Deals Directly. Our teams endeavor to establish “market presence” in our target geographies where we have a history of operating in local markets and benefit from extensive long-term relationships with developers, corporate real estate owners, institutional investors and private owners. These relationships have resulted in our ability to source a large number of investments on a direct negotiated basis.

Focus on Sector-Specific Strategies. Our real estate funds focus on specific sectors and markets in areas where we believe the fundamentals are sound and dynamic capital markets allow for identification of assets whose value is not fully recognized. The real estate funds we advise have invested according to strategies established in several main sectors: office, hotel, retail, residential, industrial, warehouse and logistics and senior living.

Actively Manage our Real Estate Investments. Our real estate investments often require active management to uncover and create value. Accordingly, we have put in place experienced local asset management teams to assist in communicating with operating partners and property managers on a regular basis. These teams add value through analysis and execution of capital expenditure programs, development projects, lease negotiations, operating cost reduction programs and asset dispositions. The asset management teams work closely with the other real estate professionals to effectively formulate and implement strategic management plans.

Manage thePursuing Best Exit of Investments. We believe that “exit management” is as important as traditional asset management in order to take full advantage of the typically short windows of opportunity created by temporary imbalances in capital market forces that affect real estate.Alternatives. In determining when to exit an investment, our real estateinvestment teams consider whether ana portfolio company or asset has achieved its objectives, the financial returns (both gross MOIC and net IRR) and the appropriate timing in industry cycles and company or asset development to strive for the optimal value. Each fund’s investment has fulfilled its strategic plan, the depth of the marketcommittee approves all exit decisions.
13


Value Creation. Our Global Portfolio Solutions team helps to translate our collaborative culture into services and generally prevailing industry conditions. Throughoutoperational capabilities supporting our investment holding period,process and portfolio companies and assets. Our approach ensures that Carlyle’s global network, deep industry knowledge and operational expertise are used to support and enhance our investment professionals remain actively engaged ininvestments.
Information Technology Resources. We have established an information technology capability that contributes to due diligence, portfolio company strategy and portfolio company operations. The capability includes dedicated information technology and business process resources, including assistance with portfolio company risk assessments and enhanced deal analytics.
Digital. Given the increasing importance of digital tools and resources across the global economy, we have established a dedicated group focused exclusively on identifying, developing and implementing digital transformation strategies to help drive growth, unlock value, and drive efficiencies across our portfolio companies.
Procurement. We have developed a leveraged purchasing effort to provide portfolio companies with effective sourcing programs with better pricing and service levels to help create operating value. This program seeks to drive down costs and provide better service on common indirect spend categories and disseminate best practices on managing the steps needed to proceed to a successful exit.
Our energy and natural resources activities primarily focus on four areas: international energy, North American energy, power and infrastructure.
International Energy Investing. Our international energy team pursues investment opportunities in oil and gas exploration and production, midstream, oilfield services and refining and marketing in Europe, Africa, Latin America and Asia. Seeking to take advantage of the lack of capitalfunctional spend in the international energy market, we pursue transactions where we have a distinctive competitive advantage and can create tangible value for the companies in which we invest, through industry specialization, deploymentareas of human capital management, employee benefits, corporate real estate, information technology and accesstreasury and risk. As of December 31, 2022, over 150 portfolio companies are actively participating in the optional program, benefiting from more than 100 category arrangements and preferred vendor arrangements.
ESG. We are committed to ourthe principle that building a better business means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest. As a responsible global network. Inorganization dedicated to driving value by seeking to buildserve its stakeholders, Carlyle has made it a geographically-diverse international energy portfolio, we focus on cash-generating opportunities, with a particular focus on proven reserves and production, and strategically seek to enhance the efficiency of the portfolio through exploration or infrastructure improvements. We may pursue investment

11






opportunities of variable size, and utilize alternative structures and sources of capital, including incorporating blank check companiespriority to invest alongsidein a framework and the necessary resources for understanding, monitoring and managing environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) risks and opportunities across our fundsportfolio. We believe ESG provides an additional lens to effectively pursue large transactions.

North American Energy Investing. We conduct our current North American energy investing through our strategic partnership with NGP, an Irving, Texas-based energy investment firm that focuses on investments across a range of energyhelp us assess and natural resource assets, including oilmitigate risks, and gas resources, oilfield services, pipelinesidentify and processing, as well as agricultural investments and properties. NGP seeks to align itself with “owner-managers” who are invested in the enterprise, have a top-tier technical team and who have a proprietary edge that differentiates their business plan. NGP strives to establish a portfolio of platform companies to grow through acquisitions and development and provides financial and strategic support and access to additional capital at the lowest cost. We do not control or manage the NGP management fee funds or the existing carry funds that are advised by NGP. NGP is managed by its senior leadership.

Power Investing. Our power team focuses on investment opportunities in the North American power generation sector. Leveraging the expertise of the investment professionals at Cogentrix Energy L.L.C., one of our portfolio companies, the team seeks investments where it can obtain direct or indirect operational control to facilitate the implementation of technical enhancements. We seek to capitalize on secular trends and to identify assets where engineering and technical expertise, in addition to a strong management team, can facilitate performance.
potential opportunities.

Global Infrastructure Investing. Our global infrastructure team pursues investments across a variety of sectors and geographies. The fund team targets investment opportunities primarily domiciled in developed markets with strong commercial systems and rule of law. The team utilizes a value-added approach to transaction sourcing, diligence and asset management and seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for the fund. The team seeks to enhance the value of its investments through strategic and operational impact including risk management techniques utilized across Carlyle's global corporate private equity and natural resources investment businesses. The goal of this approach is to increase the profitability of the investments, increase cash flow yield and enhance the attractiveness of the asset for ultimate exit to a trade buyer, core infrastructure buyer or the public markets.
Global Credit
The investment approach of our Global Credit platform's credit-focused fundsplatform is generally characterized as follows:
Source Investment Opportunities. Our Global Credit team sources investment opportunities from both the primary and secondary markets through our global network and strong relationships with the financial community. We typically target portfolio companies that have a demonstrated track record of profitability, market leadership in their respective niche, predictable cash flow, a definable competitive advantage and products or services that are value addedvalue-added to itstheir customer base.


Conduct Fundamental Due Diligence and Perform Capital Structure Analyses. After an opportunity is identified, our Global Credit investment professionals conduct fundamental due diligence to determine the relative value of the potential investment and capital structure analyses to determine credit worthiness. Our due diligence approach typically incorporates meetings with management, company facility visits, discussions with industry analysts and consultants and an in-depth examination of financial results and projections. In conducting due diligence, our Global Credit team employs an integrated, cross platformcross-platform approach with industry-dedicated credit research analysts and non-investment grade expertise across the capital structure. Our Global Credit team also seeks to leverage resources from across the firm, utilizing information obtained from our more than 270nearly 300 active portfolio companies and lending relationships, with over 700 companies, 1320 credit industry research analysts, and in-house government affairs and economic research teams.
We utilize a proprietary ESG materiality assessment tool across our Global Credit platform to help our investment professionals efficiently understand a company’s or asset’s exposure to material ESG risks as part of the due diligence process.


Evaluation of Macroeconomic Factors. Our Global Credit team evaluates technical factors such as supply and demand, the market’s expectations surrounding a company and the existence of short- and long-term value creation or destruction catalysts. Inherent in all stages of credit evaluation is a determination of the likelihood of potential catalysts emerging, such as corporate reorganizations, recapitalizations, asset sales, changes in a company’s liquidity and mergers and acquisitions.
14




Risk Minimization. Our Global Credit team seeks to make investments in capital structurescompanies that are well-positioned to enable companies to both expand and weather downturns and/or below-plan performance. The team works to structure investments with strong financial covenants, frequent reporting requirements and board representation, if possible. Through

12






board representation or observation rights, our Global Credit team works to provide a consultative, interactive approach to equity sponsors and management partners as part of the overall portfolio management process. In our CLO business, our liquid credit team uses an in-house risk and analytics platform to monitor and analyze our portfolio, and repositions the portfolio as appropriate. The analytics platform is also used to generate sensitivity analysis for critical risk factors such as default rates, prepayment rates and liquidation prices.
    Global Investment Solutions
Our Global Investment Solutions team aims to apply a wide array of capabilities to help clients meet their investment objectives. The investment approach of our Global Investment Solutions platform is generally characterized as follows:
 
Well-informed, Disciplined Investment Process: We follow a disciplined, highly-selective investment process and seek to achieve diversification by deploying capital across economic cycles, segments and investment styles. Our integrated and collaborative culture across our strategies, reinforced by investment in information technology solutions, provides deep insight into fund manager portfolios and operations to support our rigorous selection process.


Proactive Sourcing: OurAlpInvest’s extensive network of private equity and real estate managers across the globe positions us to identify investment opportunities that may be unavailable to other investors. Our investment strategy is defined by a strong belief that the bestmost attractive opportunities are found in areas that are less subject to fewer competitive pressures. As a result, our teams actively seek out proprietary investments that would otherwise be difficult for our investors to access.
access alone.


Global Scale and Presence: Our scale and on-the-ground presence across three continents - Asia, Europe and North America - give us a distinct and comprehensive perspective on the private equity and real estate markets. Our stable, dedicated, and experienced teams have deep knowledge of their respective markets across the globe. We believe this enhances our visibility across the global investment market and provides detailed local information that enhances our investment evaluation process.


Our Family of FundsGlobal Investment Offerings
The following chart presentstable provides a breakout of the name (acronym),product offerings and related acronyms included in our total capital commitments (in the case of our carry funds, structured credit funds, and the NGP management fee funds), assets under management (in the case of structured products), gross assets (in the case of our business development companies) and vintage year of the active funds in each of our segments,$373 billion as of December 31, 2017. We present total capital commitments (as opposed to assets under management)2022 for our closed-end investment funds because we believe this metric provides the most useful information regarding the relative size and scale of such funds. In the caseeach of our products which are open-ended and accordingly do not have permanent committed capital, we generally believe the most useful metric regarding relative size and scale is assets under management.three global business segments (in billions):
Corporate Private Equity Global Credit Real Assets
Buyout Carry Funds Loans & Structured Credit Real Estate Carry Funds
Carlyle Partners (U.S.) Cash CLO's Carlyle Realty Partners (U.S.)
CP VII$14.1 bn2017 U.S.$16.4 bn2006-2017 CRP VIII$5.0 bn2017
CP VI$13.0 bn2014 Europe€8.5 bn2005-2017 CRP VII$4.2 bn2014
CP V$13.7 bn2007 Structured Credit Carry Funds CRP VI$2.3 bn2011
CP IV$7.9 bn2005 CSC$838 mm2016 CRP V$3.0 bn2006
Global Financial Services Partners CASCOF$445 mm2015 CRP IV$950 mm2005
CGFSP III$491 mm2017 Direct Lending CRP III$564 mm2001
CGFSP II$1.0 bn2013 
Business Development Companies1
 Carlyle Europe Real Estate Partners
CGFSP I$1.1 bn2008 TCG BDC II, Inc.$570 mm2017 CER€99 mm2017
Carlyle Europe Partners TCG BDC, Inc.$2.0 bn2013 CEREP III€2.2 bn2007
CEP IV€3.7 bn2014 Corporate Mezzanine Carry Fund Carlyle Asia Real Estate Partners
CEP III€5.3 bn2007 CMP II$553 mm2008 CCR$120 mm2016
CEP II€1.8 bn2003 Opportunistic Credit Carry Fund CAREP II$486 mm2008
Carlyle Asia Partners CCOF$757 mm2017 Core Plus Real Estate (U.S.)
CAP V$4.7 bn2017 Energy Credit Carry Funds CPI$1.1 bn2016
CBPF IIRMB 301 mm2017 CEMOF II$2.8 bn2015 Natural Resources Funds
CAP IV$3.9 bn2014 CEMOF I$1.4 bn2011 Infrastructure Carry Fund
CBPF IRMB 2.0 bn2010 Distressed Credit Carry Funds CGIOF$756 mm2017
CAP III$2.6 bn2008 CSP IV$2.5 bn2016 CIP I$1.1 bn2006
CAP II$1.8 bn2006 CSP III$703 mm2011 Power Carry Funds
Carlyle Japan Partners CSP II$1.4 bn2007 CPP II$1.5 bn2014
CJP III¥119.5 bn2013     CPOCP$478 mm2013
CJP II¥165.6 bn2006   International Energy Carry Fund
Carlyle MENA Partners Investment Solutions CIEP I$2.5 bn2013
MENA I$471 mm2008 AlpInvest NGP Energy Carry Funds
Carlyle South American Buyout Fund Fund of Private Equity Funds NGP XII$2.8 bn2017
CSABF I$776 mm2009 67 vehicles€41.6 bn2000-2017 NGP XI$5.3 bn2014
Carlyle Sub-Saharan Africa Fund Secondary Investments NGP X$3.6 bn2012
CSSAF I$698 mm2012 50 vehicles€14.7 bn2000-2017 NGP Agribusiness Carry Fund
Carlyle Peru Fund Co-Investments NGP GAP$402 mm2014
CPF I$308 mm2012 49 vehicles€14.4 bn2000-2017 NGP Management Fee Funds
Carlyle Global Partners Metropolitan Real Estate 
Various2
$7.2 bn2004-2008
CGP$3.6 bn2015 Real Estate Fund of Funds Legacy Energy Carry Funds
Growth Carry Funds 31 vehicles$3.6 bn2002-2017 Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy
Carlyle U.S. Venture/Growth Partners     Energy IV$6.0 bn2008
CEOF II$2.4 bn2015     Energy III$3.8 bn2005
CEOF I$1.1 bn2011     Energy II$1.1 bn2003
CUSGF III$605 mm2006     Carlyle/Riverstone Renewable Energy
CVP II$602 mm2001     Renew II$3.4 bn2008
Carlyle Europe Technology Partners        
CETP III€657 mm2014        
CETP II€522 mm2008        
Carlyle Asia Venture/Growth Partners        
CAGP V$292 mm2017        
CAGP IV$1.0 bn2008        
CAGP III$680 mm2005        
Carlyle Cardinal Ireland        
CCI€292 mm2014        
           
Global Private Equity1
$163.1 Global Credit$146.3 
Corporate Private Equity$105.5 
Insurance 5
$51.4 
U.S. Buyout (CP)52.5 Liquid Credit$50.4 
Europe Buyout (CEP)11.5 U.S. CLOs37.1 
Asia Buyout (CAP)11.2 Europe CLOs11.4 
Carlyle Global Partners (CGP)6.5 Revolving Credit1.9 
Europe Technology (CETP)6.2 Illiquid Credit$22.2 
U.S. Growth (CP Growth / CEOF)4.2 Opportunistic Credit (CCOF / CSP)12.8 
Japan Buyout (CJP)3.4 
Direct Lending 6
9.4 
Life Sciences (ABV / ACCD)1.7 Real Assets Credit$16.1 
Other 2
8.3 Aviation (SASOF / CALF)11.5 
Real Estate$30.3 Infrastructure (CICF)3.7 
U.S. Real Estate (CRP)19.2 
Other 7
1.0 
Core Plus Real Estate (CPI)8.0 Platform Initiatives and Other Products$6.1 
International Real Estate (CER)3.1 Carlyle Tactical Private Credit (CTAC)2.0 
Infrastructure & Natural Resources$27.3 Other Platform Initiatives and Products4.1 
NGP Energy 3
12.7 Global Investment Solutions$63.3 
International Energy (CIEP)8.1 Secondary and Portfolio Finance Investments$21.0 
Infrastructure & Renewable Energy 4
6.5 Co-Investments$17.2 
Primary Fund Investments$25.1 
Note: All amounts shown represent total capital commitmentsassets under management as of December 31, 2017, unless otherwise noted. Certain of our recent vintage funds are currently in fundraising2022, and total capital commitments are subjecttotals may not sum due to change.rounding. In addition, certain carry funds included herein may not be disclosed which are not included in fund performance if they have not made an initial capital call.call or commenced investment activity.

(1)Amounts represent gross assets plus any available capital as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Includes NGP ETP I, NGP M&R, NGP ETP II, NGP VIII and NGP IX.

(1)Global Private Equity also includes assets under management in funds which we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (the “Legacy Energy funds”). The impact of these funds is no longer significant to our results of operations.
(2)Includes our Financial Services (CGFSP), Asia Growth (CAP Growth / CAGP), Sub-Saharan Africa Buyout (CSSAF), South America Buyout (CSABF), Peru Buyout (CPF), MENA Buyout and Ireland Buyout (CICF) funds, as well as platform accounts which invest across Corporate Private Equity strategies.

(3)NGP Energy funds are advised by NGP Energy Capital Management, LLC, a separately registered investment adviser. We do not serve as an investment adviser to those funds.

(4)Includes our Infrastructure (CGIOF), Renewable Energy (CRSEF) and Power funds (CPP / CPOCP).
13(5)Includes Carlyle FRL, capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside Carlyle FRL, as well as the fair value of the general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude.



(6)Includes our business development companies (CSL / CARS) and our newly launched evergreen fund (CDLF).

(7)Includes our Energy Credit (CEMOF) and Real Estate Credit (CNLI) funds.


Organizational Structure
The simplified diagram below depicts    On January 1, 2020, we completed our organizational structure. Ownership information in the diagram below is presented as of December 31, 2017. The diagram does not depict all of our subsidiaries, including intermediate holding companies through which certain of the subsidiaries depicted are held. As discussed in greater detail below,conversion from a Delaware limited partnership named The Carlyle Group L.P. holds, through wholly owned subsidiaries,into a number of Carlyle Holdings partnership units that is equal to the number of common units thatDelaware corporation named The Carlyle Group L.P. has issued and benefits from the income of Carlyle Holdings to the extent of its equity interests in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. While the holders ofInc. Our common units of The Carlyle Group L.P.stockholders are entitled to one vote per share and to vote on all matters on which stockholders of a corporation are generally entitled to vote on under Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), including the economic rights in The Carlyle Group L.P.,election of our Board of Directors.
    In connection with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, like the wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P., hold Carlyle Holdings partnership units that entitle them to economic rights in Carlyle Holdings to the extent of their equity interests in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. Public investors do not directly hold equity interests in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships.

(1)The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders have only limited voting rights and have no right to remove our general partner or, except in limited circumstances, elect the directors of our general partner. TCG Carlyle Global Partners L.L.C., an entity wholly owned by ourConversion, senior Carlyle professionals holds a special voting unit in The Carlyle Group L.P. that entitles it, on those few matters that may be submitted for a vote of The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders, to participate in the vote on the same basis as the common unitholders and provides it with a number of votes that is equal to the aggregate number of vested and unvested partnership units in Carlyle Holdings held by the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings on the relevant record date.

(2)Certain individuals engaged in our business own interests directly in selected subsidiaries, including, in certain instances, entities that receive management fees from funds that we advise. See “— Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds — Incentive Arrangements/Fee Structure” in this Item 1 for additional information.
The Carlyle Group L.P. conducts all of its material business activities through Carlyle Holdings. Each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships was formed to hold our interests in different businesses. Carlyle Holdings I L.P. owns all of our U.S. fee-generating businesses and many of our non-U.S. fee-generating businesses, as well as our carried interests (and other

14






investment interests) that derive income that we believe is not qualifying income for purposes of the U.S. federal income tax publicly-traded partnership rules and certain of our carried interests (andthe other investment interests) that do not relate to investments in stock of corporations or in debt, such as equity investments in entities that are pass-through for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Carlyle Holdings II L.P. holds a variety of assets, including our carried interests in many of the investments by our carry funds in entities that are treated as domestic corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes and in certain non-U.S. entities. Certain of our non-U.S. fee-generating businesses, as well as our non-U.S. carried interests (and other investment interests) that derive income that we believe is not qualifying income for purposes of the U.S. federal income tax publicly-traded partnership rules and certain of our non-U.S. carried interests (and other investment interests) that do not relate to investments in stock of corporations or in debt, such as equity investments in entities that are pass-through for U.S. federal income tax purposes are held by Carlyle Holdings III L.P.
The Carlyle Group L.P. has wholly owned subsidiaries that serve as the general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships: Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. (a Delaware corporation that is a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes), Carlyle Holdings II GP L.L.C. (a Delawareformer limited liability company that is a disregarded entity and not an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and Carlyle Holdings III GP L.P. (a Québec société en commandite that is a foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) serve as the general partners of Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P. and Carlyle Holdings III L.P., respectively. Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. and Carlyle Holdings III GP L.P. serve aswho became holders of shares of common stock in connection with the general partners of Carlyle Holdings I L.P. and Carlyle Holdings III L.P., respectively, through wholly owned subsidiaries that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes. We refer to Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc., Carlyle Holdings II GP L.L.C. and Carlyle Holdings III GP L.P. collectively as the “Carlyle Holdings General Partners.”
Holding Partnership Structure
The Carlyle Group L.P. is treated as a partnership and not as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, although our partnership agreement does not restrict our ability to take actions that may result in our being treated as an entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal (and applicable state) income tax purposes. An entity that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not a taxable entity and incurs no U.S. federal income tax liability. Instead, each partner is required to take into account its allocable share of items of income, gain, loss and deduction of the partnership in computing its U.S. federal income tax liability, whether or not cash distributions are made. Each holder of our common units is a limited partner of The Carlyle Group L.P., and accordingly, isConversion were generally required to pay U.S. federal income taxes with respectgrant an irrevocable proxy to the income and gain of The Carlyle Group L.P. that is allocated to such holder, even if The Carlyle Group L.P. does not make cash distributions. We believe that the Carlyle Holdings partnerships should also be treated as partnerships and not as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the holders of partnership units in Carlyle Holdings, including The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries, incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on their proportionate share of any net taxable income of Carlyle Holdings.
Each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships has an identical number of partnership units outstanding, and we use the terms “Carlyle Holdings partnership unit” or “partnership unit in/of Carlyle Holdings” to refer collectively to a partnership unit in each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. The Carlyle Group L.P. holds, through wholly owned subsidiaries, a number of Carlyle Holdings partnership units equal to the number of common units that The Carlyle Group L.P. has issued. The Carlyle Holdings partnership units that are held by The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries are economically identical to the Carlyle Holdings partnership units that are held by the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. Accordingly, the income of Carlyle Holdings benefits The Carlyle Group L.P. to the extent of its equity interest in Carlyle Holdings.
The Carlyle Group L.P. is managed and operated by our general partner, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., to whom we refer as “our general partner,” which is in turn wholly owned by our founders and other senior Carlyle professionals. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our general partner does not have any business activities other than managing and operating us. We reimburse our general partnerCommon Stock—Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its affiliates for all costs incurred in managing and operating us, and our partnership agreement provides that our general partner determines the expenses that are allocable to us. Although there are no ceilings on the expenses for which we will reimburse our general partner and its affiliates, the expenses to which theyinterests may be entitled to reimbursement from us, such as director fees, historically have not been, and are not expected to be, material.conflict with ours or yours.”


LPLimited Partner Relations
Our diverse and sophisticated investor base includes more than 1,7502,900 active investors in our carry funds, excluding Investment Solutions,products located in 8388 countries. Included among our many longstanding fund investors are pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies and high net worth individuals in the United States, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and South America.

15






We strive to maintain a systematic fundraising approach to support growth and serve our investor needs. This approach to fundraising has been critical in raising over $43 billion in 2017. We work for our fund investors and continuously seek to strengthen and expand our relationships with them through frequent investor engagement and by cross-selling products across our diverse platform. We have a dedicated in-house LPinvestor relations group which includes 26 geographically-focusedthat strives to cultivate long-term, strategic partnerships with our limited partners. Our team combines strong segment sales with firm-level strategy and coordination to bring the best of Carlyle to our limited partners. Each segment team consists of a combination of geographically focused professionals with extensive investor relations and fundraising experience. In addition, we have 16dedicated product specialists with a focuswho collaborate to deliver on specific business segments and 11 professionals focused on high net worth distribution. Our LP relations group isinvestor needs. Segment teams are supported by 47 supporta central staff responsible for project managementdata analytics and fulfillment. additional fulfillment responsibilities. In addition, our Carlyle Private Wealth team is dedicated to fundraising in the private wealth channel globally, and is organized regionally within each of its three constituent segments: Family Wealth, Wealth Management and National Accounts.
Our LP relationsInvestor Relations professionals are in constantregular dialogue with our fund investors, which enablesenabling us to monitor investor preferences and tailor future fund offerings to meet investor demand. We striveseek to secure a first-mover advantage with key investors, often by establishing a local presence and providing a broad and diverse range of investment opportunities. We continually endeavor to expand our partnerships by sharing our insights and perspectives on the market and investment environment, as well as discussing how we can help the investor achieve their objectives. We continue to use technology to augment our fund transparency and communication around insights as well as facilitate consistent dialogue through both virtual and in-person meetings and events. This partnership approach to fundraising has been critical in raising $81.2 billion over the past two years.
As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately 92%94% of commitments to our active carry funds (by dollar amount) were from investors who are committed to more than one active carry fundproduct and approximately 62%76% of commitments to our active carry funds (by dollar amount) were from investors who are committed to more than five active carry funds.products. We believe the loyalty of our carry fund investor base, as evidenced by our substantial number of multi-fund relationships, enhances our ability to raise new funds and successor funds in existing strategies.
Investor Services
We have a team of over 450790 investor services professionals worldwide. The investor services group performs a range of functions to support our investment teams, LP relations group and the corporate infrastructure of Carlyle. Our investor services professionals provide an important control function, ensuring that transactions are structured pursuant to the partnership agreements, assisting in global regulatory compliance requirements and investor reporting to enable investors to easily monitor
15


the performance of their investments. We have devoted substantial resources to creating comprehensive and timely investor reports, which are increasingly important to our investor base. The investor services group also works closely with the investment teams throughout each fund’s lifecycle, from fund formation and investments to portfolio monitoring and fund liquidation. We maintain an internal global legal and compliance team, which includes 2740 professionals and a government relations group of five professionals with a presence around the globe which includes 16 professionals as of December 31, 2017. We intend to continue to build and invest in our legal, regulatory and compliance and tax functions to enable our investment teams to better serve our investors.2022.
Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds
We conduct the sponsorship and management of our carry funds and other investment vehicles primarily through limited partnerships, which are organized by us, to accept commitments and/or funds for investment from institutional investors and high net worth individuals. EachIn general, each investment fund that is a limited partnership, or “partnership” fund, has a general partner that is responsible for the management and operation of the fund’s affairs and makes all policy and investment decisions relating to the conduct of the investment fund’s business. Generally, the limited partners of such funds take no part in the conduct or control of the business of such funds, have no right or authority to act for or bind such funds and have no influence over the voting or disposition of the securities or other assets held by such funds, although such limited partners may vote on certain partnership matters including the removal of the general partner or early liquidation of the partnership by majority vote, as discussed below. Most of our funds also have an investor advisory committee, comprising representatives of certain limited partners, which may consider and/or waive conflicts of interest or otherwise consult with the general partner on certain partnership matters. In the case of certain separately managed accounts advised by us, the investor, rather than us, may control the asset or the investment decisions related thereto or certain investment vehicles or entities that hold or have custody of such assets. More often, however, we retain investment discretion with respect to separately managed accounts we advise.


Each investment fund and in the case of our separately managed accounts, the client, engages an investment adviser. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. (“CIM”) or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates serves as an investment adviser for most of our carry funds and is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (“CGCIM”) is an affiliate of CIM and serves as investment adviser for most of our Global Credit carry funds, as well as two of our BDCs and the Interval Fund and is registered under the Advisers Act. The business of Carlyle Aviation Partners includes investment funds organized to invest in certain aviation-related securities and physical assets (including aircraft, engines and components), and certain of the advisers and general partners of such funds are currently not registered under the Advisers Act or otherwise operated in reliance on another entity’s registration under the Advisers Act. Our investment advisers are generally entitled to a management fee from each investment fund for which they serve as investment advisers. For a discussion of the management fees to which our investment advisers are entitled across our various types of investment funds, see “—Incentive“Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” below.
Investment funds themselves typically do not register as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act” or the “Investment Company Act”), in reliance on Section 3(c)(7) or Section 7(d) thereof or, typically in the case of funds formed prior to 1997, Section 3(c)(1) thereof. Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act exempts from the 1940 Act’s registration requirements investment funds privately placed in the United States whose securities, are owned exclusively by persons who, at the time of acquisition of such securities, are owned by “qualified purchasers” as defined under the 1940

16






Act andwho purchase their interests in a private placement. Section 3(c)(1) of the 1940 Act exempts from the 1940 Act’s registration requirements privately placed investment funds whose securities are beneficially owned by not more than 100 persons and who purchase their interests in a private placement. In addition, under certain current interpretations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”), Section 7(d) of the 1940 Act exempts from registration any non-U.S. investment fund all of whose outstanding securities are beneficially owned either by non-U.S. residents or by U.S. residents that are qualified purchasers and purchase their interests in a private placement. Certain of our investment funds, however, rely on other exemptions from the 1940 Act or register as investment companies under the 1940 Act or elect to be regulated as business development companiesBDCs under the 1940 Act.
The governing agreements of the vast majority of our investment funds provide that, subject to certain conditions, a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of third-party investors in those funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause and/or to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause. In addition, the governing agreements of many of our investment funds generally require investors in those funds to affirmatively vote to continue the investmentcommitment period in the event that certain “key persons” in our investment funds do not provide the specified time commitment to the fund or our firm ceaseceases to control the general partner (or similar managing entity) or the investment adviser or ceaseceases to hold a specified percentage of the economic interests in the general partner.partner (any such events, a “Key Person Event”).
With limited exceptions, our carry funds, business development companies,BDCs, Interval Fund, NGP Predecessor Funds, and NGP management fee fundscertain other investment vehicles, are closed-end funds. In a closed-end fund structure, once an investor makes an investment, the investor is generally not able to withdraw or redeem its interest, except in very limited circumstances. Furthermore, the governing agreement of each limited partnershipinvestment vehicle contains restrictions on an investor’s ability to transfer its interest in the fund. In the open-endedopen-end funds we advise, investors'investors’ interests are usually locked up for a period of time after which investors may generally redeem their interests on a quarterly basis, to the extent that sufficient cash is available.
16


With respect to our CPE, Real Assetsclosed-end Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds, investors generally agree to fund their commitment over a period of time. For our private equitysuch carry funds, the commitment period generally runs until the earlierearliest of (i) the sixth anniversary of either the effective date (the date we start charging management fees for(as defined in the fund)applicable limited partnership agreement), or the initial closing date ordate; (ii) the fifth anniversary of the final closing date of the fund; (ii)(iii) the date the general partner cancels suchthe investors’ obligation to fund capital contributions due to changes in applicable laws, business conditions or when at least a significant portion (which may range between 75% and 90%) of the capital commitments to the fund have been invested, committed or reserved for investments; (iii)(iv) the date a supermajority in interest (based on capital commitments) of investors vote to terminate the commitment period; or (iv)(v) the failureoccurrence of certain key persons to devote a specified amount of time to such fund or Carlyle, to control the general partner or the investment adviser or to hold a specified percentage of the economic interests in the general partner,Key Person Event, unless upon any of these events the investors vote to continue the investmentcommitment period. Following the termination of the commitment period, an investor generally will be released from any further obligation with respect to its undrawn capital commitment except to the extent necessary to pay partnership expenses and management fees, fund outstanding borrowings and guarantees, complete investments with respect to transactions committed to prior to the end of the commitment period and make follow-on investments in existing companies.investments (collectively, the “post-termination obligations”). Generally, an investor’s obligation to fund follow-on investments extends for a period of three yearscontinues following the end of the commitment period, although certain funds do not have a time limit and there may be limitations on how much the fund is permitted to fund for such follow-on investments. In those funds where such limitations exist, they generally range from 15-20% of the fund'sfund’s aggregate capital commitment.
For the latest generation of our closed-end real estate funds, the length of the commitment period generally runsvaries from fund to fund, typically running for a period of between two and five years from the final closing date, provided that the general partner may unilaterally extend such expiration date for one year and may extend it for another year with the consent of a majority of the limited partners or the investment advisory committee for that fund. Investors in the latest generation of our closed-end real estate funds are also obligated to continue to make capital contributions with respect to follow-on investments and to repay indebtedness for a period of time after the original expiration date of the commitment period, as well as to fund partnership expenses and management fees during the life of the fund.


The term of each of the CPE, Real Assetsclosed-end Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds generally will end 10 years from the initial closing date, or in some cases, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances (e.g., six years, in the case of certain Carlyle Aviation Partners funds) or later if extended by the general partner (in many instances with the consent of a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of the investors or the investment advisory committee) for successive one-year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Certain of such investment funds may have a longer initial termination date (such funds, "long-dated funds"“longer-dated funds”), such as 15 years from the final closing date.date, or may be open-ended.
With respect to our Global Investment Solutions vehicles and separately managed accounts, the commitment period generally runs for a period of one to five years after the initial closing date of the vehicle. Following the termination of the commitment period, an investor in one of our Investment Solutions vehicles or separately managed accounts generally will only be required

17






to fund additional amounts for partnership expenses, outstanding borrowings and guarantees, transactions in process or committed to during the commitment period follow-on investments in existing companies. The term of each of the funds generally will end 8 to 12 years from the initial closing date. In some cases, the termination date may be later if extended by the general partner (in many instances with the consent of a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of the investors or the investment advisory committee) for successive up to two-yearthree-year periods, potentially up to a maximum of four years or until such time as is reasonably necessary for the general partner to be able to liquidate the fund'sfund’s assets.
Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure
Fund Management Fees. The Partnership provides We provide management services to funds in which it holdswe hold a general partner interest or has a managementwith which we have an investment advisory agreement. For closed-end carry funds in the CPE, Real AssetsGlobal Private Equity and Global Credit segments, management fees generally range from 1.0% to 2.0% of commitments during the fund's investment periodfund’s commitment period. With respect to Global Private Equity carry funds, such management fees are generally based on limited partners'partners’ capital commitments to the funds.funds and with respect to Global Credit carry funds, such management fees are generally based on limited partners’ invested capital. Following the expiration or termination of the investmentcommitment period, management fees generally are based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and the rate charged may also be reduced to between 0.6% and 2.0%. For certainreduced. These terms may vary for separately managed accounts, open-end funds and longer-dated carry funds with expected terms greater than ten years, management fees generally range from 0.2% to 1.0% based on contributions for unrealized investments or the current value of the investment.and other closed end funds. The investment adviser will receive management fees during a specified period of time, which is generally ten years from the initial closing date, or, in some instances, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances or later if extended for successive one yearone-year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Depending on the contracted terms of the investment advisory or investment managementagreement and related agreements, these fees are generally called semi-annually in advance. For certain open-end and longer-dated carry funds, management fees are called quarterly in arrears over the life of the funds.
Within the Global Credit segment, for CLOs and other structured products, management fees generally range from 0.3%0.4% to 0.6%0.5% based on the total par amount of assets or the aggregate principal amount of the notes in the CLO and are due quarterly or semi-annually based on the terms.quarterly. Management fees for the CLOs and other structured products are governed by indentures and collateral management agreements. The investment advisers will receive management fees for the CLOs until redemption of the securities issued by the CLOs, which is generally five to ten years after issuance. Investment adviser ofCLOs. Management fees for the business development company generally receives management feesBDCs are due quarterly in arrears at annual rates that range from 1.00% of approximatelynet asset value (as adjusted for capital called, dividends reinvested, distributions paid and issuer share repurchases made) to 1.5% of gross assets excluding(excluding cash and cash equivalents.equivalents). Management fees for the Interval Fund are due monthly in arrears at the annual
17


rate of 1.0% of the month-end value of the Interval Fund’s net assets. Carlyle Aviation Partners’ funds have varying management fee arrangements depending on the strategy of the particular fund. Under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, the Company earns a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability and which is due quarterly in arrears.
The investment adviseradvisers of our Global Investment Solutions private equity and real estate carry fund vehiclesfunds generally receivesreceive an annual management fee that ranges from 0.25% to 1.0% of the vehicle’sfund’s capital commitments or its committed capital to investments during the commitment fee period of the relevant fund or the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds.fund. Following the expiration of the commitment fee period, or weighted-average investment period of such funds, the management fees generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% on (i) net invested capital; (ii) the lower of cost or fairnet asset value of the capital invested, (ii)invested; or (iii) the net asset value for unrealized investments or (iii) the contributions for unrealized investments; however certain separately managed accounts earninvestments. In some cases, management fees at all timesare charged based on contributionsnet invested capital of underlying investments for unrealized investments or on the initial commitment amount.entire duration of the applicable Global Investment Solutions carry funds. The management fees we receive from our Global Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles typically are payable quarterly in advance.
Our equity interest in NGP previously entitledentitles us to an allocation of income equal to 47.5%, which increased to 55% in January 2015, of the management fee-related revenues of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP management fee funds.Energy Funds.
The general partners or investment advisers to certain of our CPE, Real AssetsGlobal Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds from time to time receive customary transaction fees upon consummation of many of our funds’ acquisition transactions, receive monitoring fees from many of their portfolio companies following acquisition and may from time to time receive other fees in connection with their activities. The ongoing monitoring fees that they receive are generally calculated either as a fixed amount or as a percentage of a specified financial metric of a particular portfolio company. The transaction fees whichthat they receive are generally calculated either as a fixed amount or as a percentage (that generally ranges up to 1%, but may exceed 1% in certain circumstances) of the total enterprise value or capitalization of the investment.Theinvestment. The management fees charged to limited partner investors in our carry funds are generally reduced by 80% to 100% of the allocable portions of such transaction fees, monitoring fees, and certain other fees that are received by the general partners and their affiliates. For our most recent vintages, management fees are generally not offset by fees received by Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) in connection with capital markets activities.
    In addition, Carlyle Aviation Partners may receive servicing fees in connection with asset-backed financing transactions for certain Carlyle Aviation Partners funds, generally in the range of 2% of rents, incentive fees up to 5% of rents in the aggregate, and 3% of sales proceeds earned from such assets. To the extent the financing instruments are held by the funds, these fees are generally offset against management fees or partnership expenses of the funds.
Performance Fees.Allocations. The general partner of each of our carry funds also receives carried interest from the carry funds. Carried interest entitles the general partner to a special residual allocation of profit on third-party capital. In the case of our closed-end carry funds, in the CPE, Real Assets and Global Credit segments, carried interest is generally calculated on a “realized gain” basis, and each general partner is generally entitled to a carried interest equal to 20% allocation (or 10% to 20% on certain longer-dated carry funds, certain credit funds and external co-investment vehicles, or approximately 10% in the case

18






of most of the recent Investment Solutions carry funds, and approximately 2% to 10%12.5% in the case of most of our more mature Global Investment Solutions carry funds) of the net realized profit (generally taking into account unrealized losses) generated by third-party capital invested in such fund. Net realized profit or loss is not netted between or among funds. Our senior Carlyle professionals and other personnel who work in these operations also own interests in the general partners of our carry funds and we generally allocate 45% of any carried interest that we earn to these individuals in order to better align their interests with our own and with those of the investors in the funds. A limited portion of the carried interest may be distributed to such individuals in shares of our common stock. Of the carried interest that we retain, we utilize a portion for our new carried interest pool program that commenced in 2019 for certain of our employees who do not receive direct allocations of carried interest to further align their interests with those of our investors. For most carry funds, the carried interest is subject to an annual preferred return of 7% to 9% (or 4% to 7% for certain longer-dated carry funds) and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement) from its CPE, Real Assets. These terms may vary on longer-dated funds, certain credit funds, and Global Credit carry funds.our external co-investment vehicles. If, as a result of diminished performance of investments later investments in the life of a closed-end fund, the fund does not achieve investment returns that (in most cases) exceed the preferred return threshold or (in almost all cases) the general partner receives in excess of 20% (or 10% to 20% on certain longer-dated carry funds as well as some external co-investment vehicles, or approximately 2% to 10% in the case of most of our Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles) of the net profits on third-party capital over the life of the fund,allocated carried interest, we will be obligated to repay the amount by which the carried interest that was previously distributed to us exceeds amounts to which we are ultimately entitled. This obligation, which is known as a “giveback” obligation, operates with respect to a given carry fund’s own net investment performance only and is typically capped at the after-tax amount of carried interest received by the general partner. Each recipient of carried interest distributions is individually responsible for his or her proportionate share of any "giveback" obligation; however,“giveback” obligation, and we have historically withheld a portion of the cash from carried interest distributions to individuals as security for potential “giveback” obligations. However, we may guarantee the full amount of such “giveback” obligation in respect of amounts received by Carlyle and certain other amounts. With respect to the portion of any carried interest allocated to the firm, we expect to fund any "giveback"“giveback” obligation from available cash. Our ability to generate carried interest is an important element of our business and carried interest has historically accounted for a significant portion of our income.
The receipt of carried interest in respect of investments of our carry funds is dictated by the terms of the partnership agreements that govern such funds, which generally allow for carried interest distributions in respect of an investment upon a
18


realization event after satisfaction of obligations relating to the return of capital from all realized investments, any realized losses, allocable fees and expenses and the applicable annual preferred return. Carried interest is ultimately realized and distributed when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of,of; (ii) certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed,reimbursed; (iii) the investment fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred returnreturn; and (iv) we have decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. Distributions to eligible senior Carlyle professionals in respect of such carried interest are generally made shortly thereafter. Our decision to realize carry considers such factors as the level of embedded valuation gains, the portion of the fund invested, the portion of the fund returned to limited partner investors and the length of time the fund has been in carry, as well as other qualitative measures. Our Global Investment Solutions funds are not eligible for carried interest distributions until all capital contributions for investments and expenses and the preferred return hurdle have been returned. Although Carlyle has seldom been obligated to pay a giveback obligation, such obligation, if any, in respect of previously realized carried interest, is generally determined and due upon the winding up or liquidation of a carry fund pursuant to the terms of the fund’s partnership agreement, although in certain cases the giveback is calculated at prior intervals.
    With respect to our separately managed accounts, BDCs and the Interval Fund, carried interest is generally referred to as an “Incentive Fee.” Incentive Fees consist of performance-based incentive arrangements pursuant to management contracts when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. Incentive Fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved.
    Under our arrangements with the historical owners of Carlyle Aviation Partners, we are entitled to 100% of the management fee-related revenues and advisory fee-related revenues of Carlyle Aviation Partners that serve as advisers or service providers of the Carlyle Aviation Partners funds and portfolios of investments. In addition, we will receive 55% of the carried interest from funds managed or advised by Carlyle Aviation Partners, with the remaining 45% being allocated to the prior owners of Carlyle Aviation Partners and certain employees.
With respect to our arrangements with NGP, we have acquired future interests in the general partners of certain future funds advised by NGP that will entitle usare entitled to an allocation of income equal to 47.5% of the carried interest received by such fund general partners.NGP XI and future NGP funds. In addition, we also exercised our option to purchase interestshold an interest in the general partner of the NGP X fund, which entitles us to an allocation of income equal to 40% of the carried interest received by NGP X'sX’s general partner.
Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to our fund of funds vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15%, or in some cases 40%, of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).
Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of Metropolitan, the management team and employees are allocated all carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to the fund vehicles that have had a final closing on or prior to July 31, 2013, and 45% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments.
As noted above, in connection with raising new funds or securing additional investments in existing funds, we negotiate terms for such funds and investments with existing and potential investors. The outcome of such negotiations could result in our agreement to terms that are materially less favorable to us than for prior funds we have advised or funds advised by our competitors. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations — Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors in future funds may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”

19






Capital Invested in and Alongside Our Investment Funds
To further align our interests with those of investors in our investment funds, we have invested our own capital and that of our senior Carlyle professionals in and alongside the investment funds we sponsor and advise. Carlyle generally expects to commit to fund approximately 0.75% to 1% of the capital commitments to our future CPE, Real AssetsGlobal Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds.funds, although we may elect to invest additional amounts in funds focused on new investment areas. We also intend to make investments in our Global Investment Solutions carry funds, our open-end funds, our BDCs and other 1940 Act regulated vehicles and our CLO vehicles. In addition, certain qualified Carlyle professionals and other qualified individuals (including certain individuals who may not be employees of the firm but who have pre-existing business relationships with Carlyle or industry expertise in the sector in which a particular investment fund may be investing) are permitted, subject to certain restrictions, to invest alongside the investment funds we sponsor and advise. Fees assessed or profit allocations on such investments by such persons may be eliminated or substantially reduced.
Minimum general partner capital commitments to our investment funds are determined separately with respect to each investment fund. We may, from time to time, exercise our right to purchase additional interests in our investment funds that become available in the ordinary course of their operations. See “Item 7. Management’sPart II. Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information regarding our minimum general partner capital commitments to our funds. Our general partner capital commitments are funded with cash and not with carried interest or through a management fee waiver program.
Carlyle and its eligible employees and officers generally have the right to co-invest with most
19


Employees
    We believe that one of the CPEstrengths and Real Assetprincipal reasons for our success is the quality and Global Credit carry funds on a deal-by-deal basis, typically in an amount up to 5% of the investment opportunity (on topdedication of our base commitment).people. As of December 31, 2022, we employed more than 2,100 individuals, including over 770 investment professionals, located in 29 offices across five continents.
One Carlyle Culture
Our culture is built on promoting innovation, good citizenship and service to our investors. Carlyle uses its One Carlyle global network, deep industry knowledge, Operating Executive consultants and portfolio intelligence to create and execute a customized value creation plan for each of our CPE and Real Assets investments. To further this end, Carlyle has created a Global Investment Resources team that helps to translateemployees around the globe are united by our One Carlyle culture, which is driven by our mission to invest wisely and create value while delivering on our strategic plan to grow, build and perform. We seek to achieve our mission and deliver on our strategic plan by creating a culture where employees (1) strive to excel, (2) deliver for the firm, (3) challenge the status quo and (4) leverage diverse perspectives. We encourage our employees to leave their comfort zone and seek out a leading edge while working with passion, creativity and a relentless determination to deliver for our stakeholders. We seek to foster lateral working relationships across and beyond Carlyle while working as one team to drive long-term value creation. We strive to lead by example in driving and embracing change. We foster diverse perspectives by encouraging our employees to engage with others with candor and diversity of thought, promoting a team conscience that is inclusive and empowering.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We are committed to growing and cultivating an environment that fosters diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) and values the diverse perspectives, backgrounds, experiences and geographies of our employees and other stakeholders. We seek to promote greater diversity among our employees, enhance knowledge and understanding of key DEI issues, reward progress on our DEI goals and foster an environment where our employees and stakeholders feel included and valued for their diverse experiences and perspectives. We strive to embed DEI into serviceseverything we do by leveraging our spheres of influence. As we ignite action within Carlyle, our investments, and capabilities supportingthe business community, we are making strides in DEI in the near term and laying the foundation for even greater impact into the future.
Carlyle. A focus on DEI efforts is embedded into the highest levels of our investmentfirm, including our Board of Directors, and is guided by our DEI Council, comprised of members of our executive team, as well as key senior leaders across the globe. We strive to create a workplace culture that enhances our ability to recruit, develop and retain talent from a broad set of backgrounds and experiences and, to this end, we asked all of our employees to set a personal DEI objective beginning in 2021, a practice which we continued in 2022. Inclusive leadership is one of our core leadership competencies, and the DEI Council is involved in reviewing the promotion process for our senior personnel. All of our employees who were nominated for promotion to a Managing Director or Partner role during 2022 were evaluated on their inclusive leadership and management skills. To continue to enhance inclusive decision-making, during 2022 we continued the “Better Decisions” initiative that launched in 2019, which provides education, practical tools and guidance to build awareness of unconscious bias and to mitigate its negative effects. Over 1,500 of our employees have participated in in-person or virtual sessions of this program. In addition to these initiatives, we encourage our employees to engage with and support one another through our global Employee Resource Groups, which include DiverseAbility, LGBTQ+, Multicultural, Veterans, Women, Working Parents and NextGen groups, that were formed to cultivate and retain a diverse, equitable and inclusive workforce.
During 2022, we invested in enhancing DEI through our second year of the DEI Incentive Awards program, pursuant to which we granted approximately $2 million in awards to 70 employees from around the globe who made an impact on DEI at Carlyle by developing our people, attracting and recruiting talent, building an inclusive culture and/or furthering board diversity at our portfolio companies. This team coordinatesAward recipients were nominated by their peers, reviewed by group heads and confirmed by the DEI Council. We also launched the DEI Leadership Network, a coalition of portfolio company CEOs around the globe to develop a peer group for shared resources and insights that can help advance DEI within their respective companies.
Business and Community. The communities we touch provide us with our investment professionals and advisors, including our operating executive and other consultants, to create value during the investment lifecycle. We have also developed a leveraged purchasing effort to provide portfolio companies with effective sourcing programs with better pricing and service levels to help create operating value. This program seeksan opportunity to drive down costschange. As part of ongoing efforts to elevate DEI within our industry, Carlyle strives to improve diversity and promote an inclusive culture for women and underrepresented professionals within the industry. Carlyle is a founding signatory to the Institutional Limited Partners Association’s Diversity in Action initiative and has joined the Milken Institute as a strategic partner and first underwriter for the DEI in Asset Management Program, which was created to improve recruitment, retention and advancement for women and persons who are Black, Indigenous and People of Color within the asset management industry. In addition, we have received a perfect score for five consecutive years on common indirect spend categoriesthe Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index, which recognizes corporate efforts to support LGBTQ+ employees. Carlyle is also a member of the 30% Coalition, which works to achieve diversity in senior leadership and disseminate best practices on managing functional spendthe corporate boardroom. Moreover, we have partnerships with organizations such as the 10,000 Black Interns Programme in the areas of HR/employee benefits, corporate real estate, information technologyUK, Level 20, Out for Undergrad and treasury/risk. Our approach ensures that Carlyle’s global network, deep industry knowledge and operational expertise are used to supportthe Diversity & Inclusion in Asia Network.

Employee Engagement

We routinely evaluate, modify, and enhance our investments.internal processes and technologies to increase employee engagement, productivity and efficiency. During 2020, we introduced a robust feedback training and communication campaign to deliver
Corporate Citizenship
20


real-time feedback, as well as more frequent formal performance conversations and launched a new, more streamlined performance management system, which we continued into 2022. In order to measure employee engagement, we conduct an annual engagement survey as well as other pulse surveys throughout the year. We have continued to focus on the satisfaction and wellness of our employees over the past year, and we plan to continue to use annual and pulse surveys to evaluate our performance and guide our decision-making.

We are also continuing to expand our employee training programs, including those focused on enhancing management and leadership capability at all levels of the firm. These programs include the Future Leaders Academy for new Managing Directors, the Career Strategies Initiative for Vice President and Principal-level underrepresented professionals, which is a virtual sponsorship program for underrepresented professionals, the Leadership Principles program for Principals and Directors, the Better Leaders Program for Vice Presidents and Associate Directors and the Better Managers Program for Senior Associates, Associate Vice Presidents, Managers and Associates. We also continue to support a global mentoring program. In 2022, we launched MentorcliQ, a user-friendly platform that offers a personalized experience for mentees and mentors. We also conducted in-person analyst and associate training in August 2022 for our largest ever class of investment professionals.
Compensation and Benefits
We believe that equitable compensation and incentive programs are critical to hiring and retaining highly qualified people. We seek to provide a pay and benefits package that is competitive within the local marketplace for our industry to reward and retain our employees and attract and retain talent. Compensation comprises a base salary for salaried employees and compensation per hour for hourly employees in connection with satisfying the daily expectations of their roles. Our annual discretionary performance-based cash bonus program is a significant component of our compensation program and rewards employees based on firm, segment, investment fund, department and individual performance to directly align our employees with our financial performance and strategic goals. To further align the interests of our employees with our stockholders and to cultivate a strong sense of ownership and commitment to our firm, certain employees also are eligible to receive awards of restricted stock units and/or participate in our other long-term incentive programs.
The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our people. We are committed to their health, safety and wellness and seek to provide benefits that are locally relevant for our global employees. For example, our U.S. benefits programs include health and welfare benefits (including healthcare, dental benefits and vision benefits, among others), retirement offerings (including employer matching contributions, subject to eligibility requirements), an Employee Assistance Program, family and caregiver-oriented benefits and commuting benefits, among other benefits. In addition, we have various time-off policies for eligible employees for sick leave, vacation leave, personal days, paid holidays and paid parental leave. We also seek to provide strong benefits programs globally in line with local market practices.
Consistent with our guiding principle that building better businesses means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest, we encourage our employees to get involved where they live, work and invest through our volunteer and wealth sharing programs. In 2022, more than 270 Carlyle employees gave over 400 philanthropic gifts, which we matched. These gifts supported over 170 nonprofit organizations globally. Carlyle employees also put their time and expertise to work through volunteer activities across our offices.
Employee Wellness
We believe that a key component to investing in our employees is investing in their wellness. We focus on five pillars of wellbeing for our employees: physical, environmental, emotional, social and financial. During June 2022, we continued our practice that started in September 2021, of hosting a “Wellbeing Month,” where we provide activities and seminars dedicated to each of the wellbeing pillars. Activities during our Wellbeing Month included seminars with external wellness providers and interactive physical activities. Beginning in September 2021, we provided our eligible employees with an annual $750 well-being stipend to use for personal wellness needs, which we continued in 2022. For the second year in a row, we also established a firmwide week-long holiday during August 2022 to provide a coordinated break for our employees.
COVID-19
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been engaged with our employees and adapted to changing circumstances while remaining committed to the health and safety of our employees. During the latter part of 2021, we implemented a hybrid return-to-office approach to reintegrate our employees, including new employees who joined Carlyle during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employees generally work in the office three days per week, depending on business needs, and work remotely for the balance of the week. Our technology infrastructure has facilitated our ability to shift to a hybrid work environment and our employees and leaders have demonstrated their ability to quickly and seamlessly adapt without disruption to our business.

21


Environmental, Social and Governance
We are committed to the principle that building a better business means investing responsibly. In Septemberresponsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest. As a responsible global organization dedicated to driving value by seeking to serve its stakeholders, Carlyle has made it a priority to invest in a framework and the necessary resources for understanding, monitoring and managing ESG risks and opportunities across our portfolio. We believe ESG provides an additional lens to help us assess and mitigate risks, and identify and capitalize on potential opportunities. To implement these principles into our investment process, in 2008, Carlylewe developed a set of responsible investment guidelinesGuidelines for Responsible Investment that consider the environmental, social and governance implications of certain investments we make. Thesemake, which help guide our investment practices. In December 2020, we expanded upon these guidelines were integralthrough the publication of our comprehensive Environmental, Social and Governance Policy, which outlines our approach to shaping the corporate social responsibility guidelines later adopted by the membersESG integration, and our resourcing, scope and investment application, and which has now replaced our Guidelines for Responsible Investment.
We continuously have sought to strengthen our governance, resourcing, reporting and transparency on ESG matters. In 2010, we became one of the American Investment Council. We use the principlesfirst major private equity firms to publish an ESG report and in these guidelines2014, we hired our first dedicated ESG professional. Since then, we have continued to informexpand our team of dedicated ESG professionals. In 2020, we further strengthened our policies and practices around evaluating new investments for ESG implications, establishing a senior ESG review committee to evaluate more complex ESG issues, in order to help guide our investment decision-making process for controlling,analysis. Also in 2020, we published our inaugural Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Report, underscoring our evolving approach to climate change and we published our first corporate investments.
We also have workedESG disclosures, utilizing Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, which provide an internationally recognized framework to develop internal expertise in sustainabilitycommunicate ESG matters to support deal teams and portfolio companies. We provide sustainability resources from workshops to pre-screened vendors that provide sustainability services to individualized support from our Chief Sustainability Officer. We are a member of Businesses for Social Responsibility, a global nonprofit business network dedicated to sustainability. We also educate portfolio companies in whichvarious stakeholders. In 2022, we have a controlling interest on the guidelines for responsible investment and encourage them to review the guidelines at the board level on an annual basis. We issue an annual Citizenship Report that highlights cases where strengthening environmental and social performance helps to create value by supporting core business imperatives. We most often see sustainability efforts adding value in four areas: customer satisfaction, brand equity, operational efficiency and cost savings and workforce.
We are a member of the British Venture Capital Association and seek to ensure that our U.K.-based portfolio companies are compliant, on a voluntary basis, with the Private Equity Reporting Group Guidelines for Disclosure and Transparency when such companies become subject to these guidelines. Carlyle is a member of Invest Europe and an active participant in its work on ESG-related industry issues. Further, we are also a member of the Bundesverband Deutscher

20






Kapitalbeteiligungsgesellschaften (BVK), the German private equity and venture capital trade association. We believe that we are compliant with the BVK Guidelines for Disclosure and Transparency and seek to ensure that our German portfolio companies comply with these guidelines when they are required to do so.
AlpInvest isbecame a signatory of the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, and remain involved with several important industry initiatives in the field, including, among others, the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, the International Sustainability Standards Board Investor Advisory Group (IIAG), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) Global Responsible Investment Steering Committee, and the One Planet Private Equity Funds Initiative.

Our Board of Directors oversees our firm’s approach to ESG given the critical importance with which we view ESG principles. The Board receives regular updates on our ESG strategy and certain investment implications, and receives information on thematic topics, such as our approach to climate risk and opportunity and DEI. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, which takes a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance, including our ESG and Impact strategy, has adoptedappointed a member of the UNBoard to serve as the ESG and Impact lead, responsible for oversight of the firm’s work in this area. In addition, Carlyle’s Global CompactHead of Impact is directly responsible for our climate strategy, and reports to the firm’s Chief Operating Officer.
With respect to our investments, we may track certain ESG key performance indicators (KPIs) that we consider relevant across diverse geographies and assets for our corporate private equity and natural resources investments, including climate-related metrics. For some of our larger strategies, we generally work with qualifying portfolio companies on collecting more tailored ESG KPIs and climate-related data such as carbon footprints.
Carlyle has an internal dedicated ESG team with a breadth of experience to help identify critical ESG matters in our investment processes, as well as a corporate social responsibility (CSR) frameworknetwork of outside experts to evaluate fund managersenable our investment teams to selectively go deeper on important ESG factors and potential ESG growth opportunities for a given investment over our projected investment periods. We believe our commitment to ESG may strengthen strategy, bring new ideas for operational efficiency and help unlock value for certain portfolio companies. AlpInvest has fully integrated CSR into its investment process and actively engages with fund managers and other stakeholders in the private equity markets to promote sustainability and improved corporate governance as an investment consideration.
Since Carlyle was established, we have recognized the value and benefits of maintaining a business model grounded in investment fundamentals, strong governance and transparency. We maintainare committed to maintaining strong internal corporate governance processes and fiduciary functions and are subject to regulatory supervision. Carlyle professionals receive regular and targeted training on many issues related to corporate governance and compliance, such as anti-corruption, conflicts of interest, economic sanctions and anti-money laundering. AllOur policy requires all employees to annually certify to their understanding of and compliance with key global Carlyle policies and procedures.
At Carlyle, we believe that diverse teams and experiences bring tremendous value to our firm. We are committed to growing and cultivating an environment that fosters diversity in gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, religion and age, as well as cultural backgrounds and ideas.
In 2013, Carlyle established our Diversity & Inclusion Council, which we believe is the first of its kind in our industry. The mission of the 19 leaders of the Council was and still is twofold - to better enable Carlyle to hire the most talented professionals in the world, as well as fostering an environment of inclusiveness for diversity in all forms that will enhance our collaborative One Carlyle culture. Carlyle earned a 100% rating on the 2018 Corporate Equality Index (CEI), a national benchmarking survey and report on corporate policies and practices related to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) workplace equality, administered by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
Global Information Technology and Solutions
Global Information Technology and Solutions, which we refer to as GTS, is essential for Carlyle to conduct investment activities, manage internal administration activities and connect aour global enterprise. As part of our GTS strategy and governance processes, we develop and routinely refine our technology architecture to leverage solutions that will best serve the needs of our investors. Our systems, data, network and infrastructure are continuously monitored and administered by formal controls and risk management processes that also help protect the data and privacy of our employees and investors. Our business continuity plans are designed to allow all critical business functions to continue in an orderly manner in the event of an emergency. Our GTS workteam works closely with our various segmentsbusiness segment teams to test Carlyle'smaintain operational resilience through business continuity plans via table top exercisesplanning and annual IT disaster recovery exercises. This annual testing, is intended to help mitigatewhich collectively support the goal of mitigating risk to the firm ifwere an actual emergency were to occur.
22


Our Information Security Steering Committee, chaired by our Chief Information Security Officer, monitors threats and prioritizes the initiatives of our information security program. We also seek to educate our employees on how to safeguard Carlyle’s information assets through quarterly security awareness training focused on cyber risks and simulated phishing exercises that provide insight into the effectiveness of our security training.
Competition
As a global alternative asset manager,investment firm, we compete with a broad array of regional and global investment firms, as well as global banking institutions and other types of financial institutions and markets, for bothemployees, investors and investment opportunities. Generally, our competition varies across business lines, geographies, distribution channels and financial markets. We believe that our competition for investors is based primarily on investment performance, business relationships, the quality of services provided to investors, reputation and brand recognition, pricing, market sentiment and the relative attractiveness of the particular opportunity in which a particular fund intends to invest. To stay competitive, we believe it is also important to be able to offer fund investors a customized suite of investment products whichthat enable them to tailor their investments across alternativesthe product offerings in private equity, real estateour three global business segments. As we continue to target high net worth investors, we also face competition for these investors from mutual funds and credit.investment firms that have competing retail products. We believe that competition for investment opportunities varies across business lines, but is generally based on industry expertise and potential for value-add, pricing, terms and the structure of a proposed investment and certainty of execution.
We generally compete with sponsors of public and private investment funds across all of our segments. Within our CPE segment, we also compete with business development companies, sovereign wealth funds and operating companies acting as strategic acquirers. In our Global Credit segment, we compete with private credit strategies, business development companies, distressed debt funds, mezzanine funds and other CLO issuers. In our Real Assets segment, we compete with real estate development companies and other infrastructure investment business. In our Investment Solutions segment, we generally compete with other fund of funds managers and/or with advisers that are turning their business models towards discretionary

21






investment advisory services. In the United States, the new government administration may propose changes to financial regulation that could increase competition from banks and non-bank institutions in certain of our business segments.
In addition to these traditional competitors, within the global alternative asset management industry, we increasingly have increasingly faced competition from local and regional firms, financial institutions,insurance and reinsurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, family offices and agencies and instrumentalities of governments in the various countries in which we invest. This trend has been especially apparent in emerging markets, where local firms tend to have more established relationships with the companies in which we are attempting to invest. In addition, largeLarge institutional investors and sovereign wealth funds increasingly have begun to develop their own in-house investment capabilities and may compete against us for investment opportunities. Furthermore, in some cases, large institutional investors have reduced allocations to “fund of funds” vehiclesopportunities and turned instead to private equity advisory firms that assist with direct investments. Greatergreater reliance on advisory firms or in-house investment management may reduce fund of funds’ appeal to large institutional investors. As we continue to target high net worth investors, we also face competition from mutual
Within our GPE segment, our main competitors for investment opportunities are generally other private equity sponsors, sovereign wealth funds and alternative asset management firmsoperating companies acting as strategic acquirers, as well as real estate development companies and other infrastructure investment business. In our Global Credit segment, our main competitors are private credit strategies, business development companies, distressed debt funds, mezzanine funds, lessors of commercial aircraft, infrastructure lenders and other CLO issuers. In our Global Investment Solutions segment, our main competitors are other fund of funds managers and/or with advisers that have competing products.are turning their business models towards discretionary investment advisory services. As larger sovereign wealth funds and pension funds pursue direct commitments and secondary transactions, our Global Investment Solutions funds may face increased competition for investments and coinvestment opportunities.


Some of the entities that we compete with as an alternative asset manager are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do. SeveralMany of our competitors also have recently raised, or are expected to raise, significant amounts of capital and many of them have investment objectives similar to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities and investor capital. Some of these competitors may also have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for us when sourcing investment opportunities. In addition, some of theseour competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds, which could allow them to consider a wider range of investments and to bid more aggressively than us for investments. Strategic buyers may also be able to achieve synergistic cost savings or revenue enhancements with respect to a targeted portfolio company, which we may not be able to achieve through our own portfolio, and this may provide them with a competitive advantage in bidding for such investments.


Employees

We believe that one of the strengths and principal reasons for our success is the quality and dedication of our people. As of December 31, 2017, we employed more than 1,600 individuals, including 654 investment professionals, located in 31 offices across six continents.

Operating Executives
Supplementing Carlyle’s investment expertise, we have retained a group of approximately 40 senior business executives who have an average of more than 30 years of experience to help Carlyle invest wisely and create value across a range of industries. These operating executives are former CEOs and other high-level executives of some of the world’s most successful corporations and currently sit on the boards of directors of a diverse mix of companies. Operating executives are independent consultants and are not Carlyle employees. Operating executives are engaged by Carlyle primarily to assist with deal sourcing, due diligence and market intelligence. Carlyle typically retains these operating executives and bears the cost of such retainer fees. Operating executives may also be engaged by, and compensated by, our portfolio companies as directors or to otherwise advise portfolio company management.
Regulatory and Compliance Matters
United States
Our businesses, as well as the financial services industry generally, are subject to extensive regulation in the United States and elsewhere. TheIn general, the SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and other regulators around the globe have in recent years significantly increased their regulatory activities with respect to alternative asset managementglobal investment firms.
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered as investment advisers with the SEC. Registered investment advisers are subject to the requirements and regulations of the Advisers Act. Such requirements relate to, among other things, fiduciary duties to advisory clients, maintaining an effective compliance program, solicitation agreements, conflicts of interest, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on agency cross and principal transactions between an adviser and advisory clients and general anti-fraud prohibitions. In addition, our registered investment advisers are subject to routine periodic and other examinations by the staff of the SEC.SEC staff. In accordance with our efforts to enhance our compliance program and in response to recommendations received from the SEC in the course of routine examinations, certain additional
23


policies and procedures have been put into place, but no material changes to our registered investment advisers’ operations have been made as a result of such examinations. Our registered investment advisers also have not been subject to

22






any regulatory or disciplinary actions by the SEC. Finally, certain of our investment advisers are subject to limited SEC disclosure requirements as “exempt reporting advisers.”
Effective January 3, 2022, Carlyle’s two affiliated broker-dealer entities, TCG Securities, L.L.C. (“TCG Securities”) and TCG Capital Markets L.L.C. (“TCG Capital Markets”), the affiliate entity through which we conduct U.S.-based marketingrestructured and fundraising activities and house our anti-money laundering compliance function,now operate as TCG Capital Markets. TCG Capital Markets is registered as a limited purpose broker/dealerbroker-dealer with the SEC is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and is also registered as a broker/dealer in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Additionally,Islands, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). In addition, TCG SecuritiesCapital Markets operates under an international broker-dealerdealer exemption in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Quebec.Saskatchewan. TCG SecuritiesCapital Markets may act as an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent in securities offerings and TCG Senior Funding L.L.C. may act as an underwriter, originator, syndicator or placement agent for loan originations. TCG Capital Markets also conducts U.S.-based marketing and fundraising activities for our Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Global Investment Solutions business lines, and houses our anti-money laundering compliance function. TCG Capital Markets acts as a placement agent, on a best effortsbest-efforts basis, for interests in private funds. Additionally, FINRA, a self-regulatory organization that is subject to SEC oversight, maintains regulatory authority over all securities firms doingfunds and other investment vehicles for such business with the public in the United States (including our broker/dealer), adopts and enforces rules governing the activities of its member firms and conducts cycle examinations and targeted sweep inquiries on issues of immediate concern, among other roles and responsibilities. Our broker/dealer islines.
    Registered broker-dealers are subject to routine periodic and other examinations by the staff of FINRA. No material changes to our broker/dealer'sbroker-dealer operations have been made as a result of such examinations.
Broker/dealers    Broker-dealers are subject to rules relating to transactions on a particular exchange and/or market, and rules relating to the internal operations of the firms and their dealings with customers including, but not limited to, the form or organization of the firm, qualifications of associated persons, officers and directors, net capital and customer protection rules, books and records and financial statements and reporting. In particular, as a result of its registered status, TCG SecuritiesCapital Markets is subject to the SEC’s uniform net capital rule, Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which specifies both the minimum level of net capital a broker/dealerbroker-dealer must maintain relative to the scope of its business activities and net capital liquidity parameters. The SEC and FINRA require compliance with key financial responsibility rules, including maintenance of adequate funds to meet expenses and contractual obligations, as well as early warning rules that compel notice to the regulators via accelerated financial reporting anytime a firm’s capital falls below the minimum required level. The uniform net capital rule limits the amount of qualifying subordinated debt that is treated as equity to a specific percentage under the debt-to-equity ratio test, and further limits the withdrawal of equity capital, which is subject to specific notice provisions. Finally, compliance with net capital rules may also limit a firm’s ability to expand its operations, particularly to those activities that require the use of capital. Violation of the net capital rule may result in censures, fines, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, revocation of licenses or registrations, the suspension or expulsion from the securities industry of the broker-dealer or its officers or employees or other similar consequences by regulatory bodies. To date, TCG SecuritiesCapital Markets has not had any capital adequacy issues and is currently capitalized in excess of the minimum maintenance amount required by regulators.
In late 2017, we filed a new membership application with FINRA for TCG Capital Markets LLC and contemporaneously applied for registration of this entity as a broker/dealer with the SEC. Upon effective registration with the SEC and membership with FINRA, TCG Capital Markets will operate as part of the Global Credit business and will engage in the placement of securities of corporate issuers in private transactions, among other related activities.
Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. one(“CGCIM”) and CSL III Advisor, LLC, subsidiaries of our subsidiaries, servesCarlyle, serve as investment adviseradvisers to certain closed-end investment companies whichthat have elected or intend to elect, to be regulated as BDCs under the Investment Company Act.Act (as well as to certain private funds and other clients). Accordingly, these BDCs are or are expected to be, subject to all relevant provisions under the Investment Company Act as registered investment companies.
In 2011,addition, CGCIM serves as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amendedinvestment adviser to the Commodity Exchange Act to expand the CFTC’s regulatory jurisdiction with respect to certain derivative instruments, including swaps. In 2012, the CFTC rescinded an exemption from CFTC registration traditionally relied upon by private fund managers, narrowed an exception related toInterval Fund, which is regulated as a registered investment companies and amended related rules and guidance. Ascompany under the Investment Company Act. Moreover, AlpInvest Private Equity Investment Management, LLC, a resultsubsidiary of these changes, managers of certain pooledCarlyle, serves as the investment vehicles with exposure in commodity interests now may be requiredadviser to register with the CFTC as commodity pool operatorsCarlyle AlpInvest Private Markets Fund (“CPOs”CAPM”) and/or commodity trading advisors (“CTAs”) and become members of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”). As such, certain of our or our subsidiaries’ risk management or other commodities interest-related activities may be subject to CFTC oversight. Consequently, certain CFTC rules expose alternative asset managers, such as us, to increased registration and reporting requirements in connection with transactions in futures, swaps and other derivatives, which is regulated by the CFTC. These regulations have required us to reassess certain business practices related to our pooled vehicles, consider registration of certain entities with the CFTC or file for additional exemptions from such registration requirements. In addition, as a result of their commodities interest-related activities, certain of our entitiesregistered investment company under the Investment Company Act. CGCIM also may be subjectserves as a sub-adviser to a wide range of other regulatory requirements, such as:CAPM.

potential compliance with certain commodities interest position limits or position accountability rules;
administrative requirements, including recordkeeping, confirmation of transactions and reconciliation of trade data; and

23






mandatory central clearing and collateral requirements.
In addition, many Carlyle vehicles are subject to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) tax regulations intended to address tax compliance issues associated with U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts. FATCA requires “foreign financial institutions” to report to the IRS information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers and imposes due diligence, withholding, documentation and reporting requirements on such entities. In many instances, however, the precise nature of the FATCA-related requirements to which Carlyle is subject is governed by bilateral Intergovernmental Agreements (“IGAs”) between the United States and the countries in which Carlyle does business. Among other things, FATCA could subject investors within certain Carlyle funds to additional tax withholding.
United Kingdom and the European Union
    Similar to the United States, jurisdictions outside the United States in which we operate, in particular Europe, have become subject to an expanding body of regulation, some of which is complex and prescriptive. Governmental regulators and other authorities in Europe have proposed or implemented a number of initiatives and additional rules and regulations that could adversely affect our business. These include rules and regulations in the United Kingdom (“UK”) that are applicable to our subsidiaries established in the UK, as well as, or in addition to, rules and regulations implemented under European Union (“EU”) directives or regulations, which generally have application throughout the European Economic Area (“EEA”) but may also have substantive differences among EU countries as they are implemented pursuant to each member state’s legislative process.
    In the UK, the principal legislation regulating financial services is the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”) and the principal European legislation affecting the conduct of our business in the EU is implemented under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”) and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”), although there are a number of other pieces of legislation both in the UK and the EU that affect our business, such as the
24


General Data Protection Regulation (and its UK equivalent). The FSMA rules and EU laws that have either been adopted into UK law in connection with the UK’s withdrawal from the EU (e.g., the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation) or already implemented in the UK through domestic legislation or regulatory rules prior to such withdrawal (e.g., MiFID and AIFMD), comprehensively regulate the provision of most aspects of our asset management and advisory business in the UK, including sales, research and trading practices, provision of investment advice, corporate finance, dealing, use and safekeeping of client funds and securities, record keeping, margin practices and procedures, approval standards for individuals, anti-money laundering, periodic reporting, settlement procedures, securitization, derivative trading, prudential capital requirements, data protection, sustainable finance, and interest rate benchmarks. Legislation not yet in effect and future legislative initiatives will impact our business. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.”
CECP Advisors LLP (“CECP”), one of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom,UK, is authorized under the FSMA and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”). CECP operates in accordance with the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”), which is the United Kingdom’s implementing legislation for the European Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”). CECP has permission to engage in a number ofundertake certain corporate finance activities regulated underin the FSMA, includingUK—broadly these are advising on, and arranging deals in relation to certain types of, investments. CECP is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients. CECP has registered a branch office in Ireland in connection with Carlyle’s investment activities in that country.
    CELF Advisors LLP (“CELF”), another one of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom,UK, is also authorized and regulated by the FCA, under the FSMA andbut has permission to engage inundertake a numberbroader range of regulated activities regulated under the FSMA, including making arrangements with a view to transactionsthan CECP, namely, arranging deals in investments, advising on investments, managing and arranging deals in relation to certain types of investments, dealing in investments as agent, and arranging for the safeguarding and administration of assets. CELF is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients. The FSMA

In 2022, we acquired Abingworth LLP (“Abingworth”), which is authorized and related rules govern most aspects of investment businesses, including sales, research and trading practices, provision of investment advice, corporate finance, use and safekeeping of client funds and securities, record keeping, margin practices and procedures, approval standards for individuals, anti-money laundering, periodic reporting and settlement procedures.
The FSMA says that any firm or individual which carries out a regulated activity in the United Kingdom must be authorized or regulated by the FCA, unlesswith permissions for establishing, operating or winding up a collective investment scheme, and managing an unauthorized AIF. Abingworth is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.
Also in 2022, CECP appointed CIC Advisors LLP (“CIC”) as an appointed representative. Under the arrangement, CECP, as the principal of CIC, has accepted regulatory responsibility for CIC of carrying out the activities of advising on investments and arranging deals in investments. Under the appointed representative arrangement, CIC is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.

Following the UK’s exit from the EU on January 31, 2020, and the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020, EEA passporting rights (which previously entitled CECP and CELF to provide certain investment services in or into the EEA on a cross-border basis and Abingworth to market its funds in the EEA on a cross-border basis) are no longer available to CECP, CELF and Abingworth. Certain EEA investor-facing activities previously carried on by those firms have been reorganized such that they are exempt.now performed by different, EEA-established, affiliates under alternative licensing arrangements, and this may continue to change in the future. These arrangements may subject us to additional regulatory obligations and may impede our ability to raise capital from EEA investors. The FCA is responsible monitoring regulated entities’ compliance withUK and the FSMA. ViolationsEU announced, on December 24, 2020, that they have reached agreement on a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement (the “TCA”), which addresses the future relationship between the parties. The TCA was approved by the UK Parliament on December 30, 2020. Due to the TCA only being agreed shortly before the end of these requirements may resultthe transition period, it applied on a provisional basis in censures, fines, imposition of additional requirements, injunctions, restitution orders, revocation or modification of permissions or registrations, the suspension or expulsionEU until it was formally ratified by the European Parliament and has applied permanently from certain “controlled functions” withinMay 1, 2021. However, the TCA does not substantively address future cooperation in the financial services industrysector or reciprocal market access into the EU by UK-based firms under equivalence arrangements or otherwise. Nevertheless, as a new agreement, the implications and operations of officers or employees performing such functions or other similar consequences.
Similar to the United States, jurisdictions outside the United States in which we operate, in particular Europe, have becomeTCA may be subject to extensive further regulation. Governmental regulators and other authoritieschange and/or develop on short notice. In addition, the Temporary Marketing Permission Regime (the “TMPR”) allows AIFMs to continue to market in Europe have proposed or implementedthe UK those funds that were in existence on December 31, 2020, on broadly the same terms as previously applied. Unless extended, the TMPR expires on December 31, 2023. Any marketing of a number of initiatives and additional rules and regulations that could adversely affect our business. new fund coming into existence after December 31, 2020, must be under the UK’s national private placement regime.

Certain of our European subsidiaries are subject to compliance requirements in connection with AIFMD, which regulates alternative investment fund managers (“AIFMs”) established in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (the “AIFMD”EEA that manage alternative investment funds (“AIFs”), which. In the UK, a retained version of the AIFMD exists. The AIFMD also regulates and imposes regulatory obligations in respect of the marketing in the EEA by AIFMs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere) of AIFs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere). The AIFMD generally became effective in countries across the European Economic Area (the “EEA”)EEA in 2014. Currently, Carlyle has three authorized AIFMs in the EEA: AlpInvest, CIM Europe S.a.r.l. (“CIM Europe”) and Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. In the UK, Abingworth is authorized under the UK retained version of AIFMD.
    The AIFMD imposes significant regulatory requirements on alternative investmentAIFMs. The AIFMD regulates fund managers by, among other things, prescribing authorization conditions for an AIFM, restricting the activities that can be undertaken by an AIFM, prescribing the organizational requirements, operating orconditions, and regulatory standards relating to such things as initial capital, remuneration, conflicts, risk management, leverage, liquidity management, delegation of duties, transparency and
25


reporting requirements. The AIFMD has the potential to restrict Carlyle’s fund marketing fundsstrategy and places additional compliance obligations on its authorized AIFMs in the form of, among other things, remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements, leverage oversight and liquidity management.
    Authorized AIFMs are entitled to investors withinmarket their AIFs throughout the EEA as well as prescribingunder a marketing passport. Under the AIFMD, an AIFM may, in addition to its fund management activity, also be authorized to provide certain conditions with regard to regulatory standards, cooperation and transparencyinvestment services that must be satisfied for non-EEA fund managers to market or manage alternative investment funds into EEA jurisdictions.would otherwise require authorization under MiFID. Authorization under the AIFMD is currently available only to EEA fund managers. One of Carlyle’s subsidiaries, AlpInvest obtained such authorization in 2015. As such, AlpInvest is licensed as an alternative investment fund manager under the AIFMD byAIFM from the Authority for Financial Markets in the Netherlands (the “AFM”). in 2015. AlpInvest is also licensed by the AFM to provide some of the additional investment management services under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. In early 2018 one of our subsidiaries,that are otherwise generally reserved to MiFID firms. CIM Europe S.a.r.l., was authorizedobtained authorization as an alternative investmentAIFM in Luxembourg in early 2018. Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. registered at the Bank of Italy’s AIFM register under no.127 in 2017.
    The AIFMD allows member states to permit marketing within their member state by non-EEA fund manager undermanagers (under what are known as national private placement regimes), provided the AIFMDlocal law imposes certain minimum requirements. Member states may impose more stringent requirements. At present, some EEA states have chosen not to operate a national private placement regime at all; some EEA states apply the minimum requirements; others require the minimum plus a few additional requirements (e.g., the appointment of a depository); and some require compliance with substantially all of the AIFMD. Certain of Carlyle’s funds are currently offered in Luxembourg. Carlyle’s other subsidiaries that manage or market alternative investment funds inselected member states of the EEA currently do so in accordance with the national private placement regimes of the variousrelevant EEA jurisdictions. Compliance with applicablejurisdiction.
In 2017, the European Commission started a review of AIFMD. The European Commission published a report on the operation of the AIFMD in January 2019, which identified certain areas requiring further analysis. A subsequent report on the application and scope of the AIFMD was published in June 2020. Following these reports, the European Commission launched a public consultation relating to its review of the AIFMD in October 2020, which closed on January 29, 2021. In November 2021, the European Commission published draft legislation, commonly referred to as “AIFMD II.” The European Commission’s draft legislation proposed a number of amendments to the AIFMD, including more onerous delegation requirements, enhanced substance requirements, additional liquidity management provisions for AIFMs to the extent that they manage open-ended AIFs, and revised regulatory reporting and investor disclosures requirements. The draft proposed significant new requirements relating to the activities of funds that originate loans including new restrictions on the structure that such funds may restrict Carlyle’s fund marketing strategy and will place additional compliance obligations intake. In addition, the form of remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements, leverage oversight and liquidity management.
Additionally,draft proposed to introduce new conditions for non-EEA AIFMs, such as certain of our US affiliates, to be able to make use of the national private placement regimes of EEA states, including a condition that the jurisdiction of neither of the AIFM and AIF have been identified as non-cooperative third countries for tax purposes nor deemed by the EU not to comply fully with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and thereby to ensure an effective exchange of information in tax matters. This gives rise to a risk that certain of our AIFs may not be able to take advantage of such regimes to raise capital from EEA investors, potentially with little notice. AIFMD II is currently passing through the EU ordinary legislative process, involving scrutiny and amendment by the European Council and the European Parliament. Agreement on the legislation between the European Commission, European Council and European Parliament is expected to be reached during 2023, after which the final shape of the new regime, and any impact on us or our subsidiaries, are subjectwill be clearer. The new regime will come into force two years after this final agreement is reached and fully approved with implementation currently expected in 2025.
In August 2021, Directive (EU) 2019/1160 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1156 (the “Cross-Border Marketing Rules”) came into force in the EU. The Cross-Border Marketing Rules were introduced to variousstreamline certain aspects of marketing investment funds by harmonizing the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”). Among other things, EMIR imposesability for EU AIFMs to distribute AIFs across the EU, including by introducing a set of requirementsnew regime for “pre-marketing.” Moreover, these regulations also impose new restrictions and new obligations on European Union derivatives activities, including risk mitigation, risk management, regulatory reporting and margin and clearing requirements. Givenfund managers that are pre-marketing their funds in the global scaleEU. Further, some EU member states (but not all) also apply, or intend to apply, certain of the derivatives activityCross-Border Marketing Rules to non-EU fund managers (including UK and U.S. fund managers) in relation to the process of various Carlyle entities, the various regulatory regimesmarketing of their funds. Accordingly, our ability to which Carlyle is subject could resultmarket our funds in duplication of administration and increased transaction costs relatedEU will vary from country to such derivatives activities.country notwithstanding this pan-EU regulation.

24






As outlined above, certain of our European subsidiaries, notably CECP, CELF and CIC in the UK, must comply with the pan-European regimeregulatory framework established by MiFID (including as retained in the UK), which regulates the provision and conduct of investment services and activities throughout the EEA. Certain aspects of MiFID sets outalso apply to AlpInvest by virtue of its MiFID “top up” permission as part of its AIFMD authorization. MiFID prescribes detailed requirements governing the organization and business conduct of business of investment firms, regulated markets and certain other entities such as credit institutions to the extent they perform investment services or activities. It also includes pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for transactions within scope.
The latest iteration of MiFID, has been substantially amended by Directive 2014/65/EU and(“MiFID II”) together with the accompanying Regulation (EU) No 600/2014/EU (collectively referred to as “MiFID II”) that, save for certain provisions, has been effective from January 3, 2018. MiFID II is designed to amend the functioning of financial markets2014 (the “Markets in light of the financial crisis and to strengthen investor protection. MiFID II hasFinancial Instruments Regulation” or “MiFIR”), extended the MiFID requirements in a number of areas including market structure requirements, new and extended requirementsrequire investment firms to comply with more prescriptive and onerous obligations in relation to transparencysuch things as: costs and charges disclosure, product design and governance, the receipt and payment of inducements, the receipt of and payment for investment research, suitability and appropriateness assessments, conflicts of interest, record-keeping, best
26


execution, transaction and trade reporting, revisedremuneration, training and competence and corporate governance. Failure to comply with MiFID II and its associated legislative acts could result in sanctions from national regulators, the loss of market access and a number of other adverse consequences which would have a detrimental impact on our business. Although the UK has now withdrawn from the EU, its rules implementing MiFID continue to have effect and MiFIR has been adopted into UK law (subject to certain amendments to ensure it operates properly in a UK-specific context) in connection with this withdrawal.
The UK has introduced a new prudential regulatory framework for UK investment firms (the “Investment Firm Prudential Regime” or the “IFPR”), which is closely based on an equivalent regulatory framework introduced at the EU-level through the EU Investment Firm Regulation and Investment Firm Directive (together “IFR/IFD”). The IFPR took effect from January 1, 2022, and applies to our subsidiaries that are UK investment firms under MiFID II, namely CECP and CELF. Under the IFPR, among other requirements, both CECP and CELF are required to maintain a more onerous policy on remuneration, set an appropriate ratio between the variable and fixed components of total remuneration and meet requirements on the structure of variable remuneration. These requirements may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain staff. Importantly, the broad discretion for UK firms that used to be available to disapply certain remuneration rules on researchthe basis of “proportionality” does not apply in relation to IFPR. Under IFPR, CECP and inducementsCELF will each also have to make public disclosure on their websites in relation to their (i) own funds, own funds requirements and product governance requirements.structures; (ii) risk management; and (iii) remuneration. The new public disclosure requirements mandate more detail including quantitative information on remuneration paid to staff. IFPR has resulted in increased regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements for CECP in particular and may continue to increase the costs of doing business and may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.

In the EU, IFR/IFD took effect from June 26, 2021 and represents a complete overhaul of “prudential” regulation in the EU and substantially increases regulatory capital requirements for certain investment firms and imposes more onerous remuneration rules, and revised and extended internal governance, disclosure, reporting, liquidity, and group “prudential” consolidation requirements (among other things). IFR/IFD affects AlpInvest, one of our subsidiaries, since it is an AIFM in the Netherlands with top-up permissions to provide investment services. In particular, as AlpInvest’s assets under management attributable to separate accounts regulated by MiFID II has therefore imposed further compliance(as defined below) increases so will AlpInvest’s regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements, on CECP, CELFwhich may increase the costs of doing business and AlpInvest.may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.
In addition, effective May 2018,The UK is introducing an important and substantial regime, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”)“Consumer Duty,” designed to improve outcomes for retail investors, aspects of which will strengthen and unify data protection rules for individuals withinbegin to apply from July 31, 2023. Although Carlyle entities do not generally deal with consumers in the EU. GDPR also addressesordinary sense, the export of personal data outside the EU. The primary objectives of GDPR areregime may potentially apply to give citizens control of their personal data and to simplify the regulatory environment for international businesses by unifying data protection regulation within the EU. Compliance with the stringent rules under GDPR requires an extensive review of allcertain of our global data processing systemsfuture funds. On December 2, 2022, the FCA published a consultation proposal that would, if implemented, remove an important exemption that is currently available to asset managers of investment funds and vendor relationships.potentially make the impact of the Consumer Duty more significant and widespread. This could have important implications for Carlyle entities if they are unable to rely on another exemption. We will continue to work closely with external counsel and advisors to monitor these developments.
Other Jurisdictions
Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to registration and compliance with laws and regulations of non-U.S. governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to, among other things, investment advisory services and the marketing of investment products, and any failure to comply with these regulations could expose us to liability and/or damage our reputation. Certain of our private funds are also required to comply with the trading and disclosure rules and regulations of non-U.S. securities regulators.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has developed Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”) rules for the automatic exchange of FATCA-like financial account information amongst OECD member states. Like FATCA, CRS imposes certain due diligence, documentation and reporting requirements on various Carlyle entities. While CRS does not contain a potential withholding requirement, non-compliance could subject Carlyle to certain reputational harm.harm and potential financial penalties.
Carlyle Hong Kong Equity Management Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity in respect of professional investors.
Carlyle Asia Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 4 (advising on securities) regulated activities in respect of professional investors.
Carlyle Global Credit (HK) Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 4 (advising on securities) regulated activities in respect of professional investors.
    Carlyle Mauritius Investment Advisor Limited and Carlyle Mauritius CIS Investment Management Limited are licensed providers of investment management services in the Republic of Mauritius and are subject to applicable Mauritian
27


securities laws and the oversight of the Financial Services Commission. In addition, Carlyle Mauritius Investment Advisor Limited holds a “Foreign Institutional Investor” license from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which entitles this entity to engage in limited activities in India. Carlyle Mauritius CIS Investment Management Limited holds a “Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor” license from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, which entitles this entity to invest in certain permitted financial instruments (including equity) and derivatives traded or listed on exchanges in the Peoples Republic of China.
Carlyle Australia Equity Management Pty Limited is licensed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission as an Australian financial services licensee and is authorized to carry on a financial services business to provide advice on and deal in financial products (managed investment schemes and securities) for wholesale clients.
    Carlyle Japan Equity Management L.L.C. (“CJEM”) is registered with the Financial Services Agency of Japan to carry out Type II Financial Instruments Business as a Japanese Type II Financial Instruments Business Operator and it is also a member of the T2FIFA, a self-regulatory organization in Japan. Pursuant to this registration, CJEM is permitted to perform marketing activities to and private placements for specified investors with respect to interests in a limited partnership.
Carlyle MENA Investment Advisors Limited, a company limited by shares in the Dubai Financial Centre, holds a Category 3C license issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority and is authorized to arrange credit or deal in investments, advise on financial products or credit and manage collective investment funds.

Carlyle MENA Advisors Limited, a company limited by shares in the Abu Dhabi Global Market, is authorized by the Abu Dhabi Financial Services Regulatory Authority and is authorized to arrange deals in investments, advise on investments or credit and manage collective investment funds.
Carlyle Singapore Investment Advisors Pte Limited holds a capital markets license and an exempt financial adviser status with the Monetary Authority of Singapore to carry on fund management and dealing in securitiesregulated capital market products activities in respect of institutional and accredited investors. In addition, we expect AlpInvest Partners Pte Limited to receive a similar license and status with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Carlyle South Africa Advisors (Proprietary) Limited, a limited company incorporated in the Republic of South Africa, is licensed as a Category 1 Authorised Financial Services Provider under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (No. 37 of 2002) and is thereby regulated by the Financial Services Board in South Africa.
Carlyle Global Credit Asia Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 9 (asset management) regulated activity in respect of asset management activities to professional investors.

25






Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. holds an authorization from the Bank of Italy to carry on fund management and real estate activities, which license was extended in 2017 to carry out AIFMD compliantAIFMD-compliant fund management and real estate activities. It is registered at the Bank of Italy’s AIFM register under no.127.
AlpInvest Partners Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity in respect of professional investors.
In connection with the wind down of its operations, DGAM surrendered its investment fund manager and portfolio manager licenses, but it will retain its    Carlyle Investments (Canada) Corporation, formerly Diversified Global Asset Management Corporation, holds an exempt market dealer license with Ontario Securities Commission to facilitate certain Carlyle fund marketing activities in Canada.
TCG Gestor is licensed by the Securities & Exchange Commission of Brazil as an investment adviser.
AlpInvest is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment management company with the Financial Supervisory Service of South Korea.
Carlyle CLO Management LLC is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment management company with the Financial Supervisory Service of South Korea.
    An investment fund advised by us holds an indirect controlling interest in Fortitude Re, a Bermuda company registered as a Class 4 and Class E insurer. Fortitude Re is subject to regulation and supervision by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA”) and compliance with all applicable Bermuda law and Bermuda insurance statutes and regulations, including but not limited to the Insurance Act of 1978 (Bermuda) and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Bermuda Insurance Act”). In addition, as a result of ownership of Fortitude by our investment fund, certain Carlyle affiliates that serve as general partner and investment advisor to the fund are subject to certain insurance laws and regulations in Bermuda as a “controller” of Fortitude Re under the Bermuda Insurance Act. These laws and regulations include certain notice requirements for any person that has become, or as a result of a disposition ceased to be, a shareholder controller of a registered insurer, and failure to comply with such requirements is an offense punishable by law.
In addition, we and/or our affiliates and subsidiaries may become subject to additional regulatory demands in the future to the extent we expand our investment advisory business in existing and new jurisdictions. There are also a number of pending or recently enacted legislative and regulatory initiatives in the United States and around the world that could significantly impact our business. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors-RisksItem 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Company- Regulation and Litigation—Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties,” “-Regulatory“Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business” and “-Regulatory“Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.���
Our businesses have operated for many years within a framework that requires our being able to monitor and comply with a broad range of legal and regulatory developments that affect our activities and we take our obligation to comply with all
28


such laws, regulations and internal policies seriously. Our reputation depends on the integrity and business judgment of our employees and we strive to maintain a culture of compliance throughout the firm. We have developed, and adhere to, compliance policies and procedures such as codes of conduct, compliance systems, education and communication of compliance matters. These policies focus on matters such as insider trading, anti-corruption, document retention, conflicts of interest, anti-money laundering and other matters. Our legal and compliance team monitors our compliance with all of the legal and regulatory requirements to which we are subject and manages our compliance policies and procedures. Our legal and compliance team also monitors the information barriers that we maintain to restrict the flow of confidential information, including material, nonpublic information, across our business. Our enterprise risk management function analyzes our operations and investment strategies to identify key risks facing the firm and works closely with the legal and compliance team to address them. The firm also has an independent and objective internal audit department that employs a risk-based audit approach that focuses on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, enterprise risk management functions and other areas of perceived risk and aims to give management and theour Board of Directors of our general partner reasonable assurance that our risks are well managedwell-managed and controls are appropriate and effective.
Website and Availability of SEC Filings
Our website address is www.carlyle.com. We make available free of charge on our website or provide a link on our website to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. To access these filings, go to the “Financial Information” portion of our “Public Investors” page on our website, and then click on “SEC Filings.” You may also read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. In addition, the reports and other documents we file with the SEC are available at a website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.
We use our website (www.carlyle.com), our corporate Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/onecarlyle/) and our corporate Twitter account (@OneCarlyle) as channels of distribution of material company information. For example, financial and other material information regarding our company is routinely posted on and accessible at www.carlyle.com. Accordingly, investors should monitor these channels, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information about Carlyle when you enroll your email address by visiting the “Email Alert Subscription” section at http://ir.carlyle.com/alerts.cfm. The contents of our website

26






and social media channels are not, however, a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are not incorporated by reference herein.
The Carlyle Group L.P. was formed in Delaware on July 18, 2011. Our principal executive offices are located at 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20004-2505.
ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our CompanyBusiness Operations
Adverse economic and market conditions could negatively impact ourRisks Related to the Assets We Manage
The alternative asset management business in many ways, including by reducing the value oris intensely competitive.
Poor performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds would cause a decline in our revenue, income and cash flow, may obligate us to repay carried interest previously paid to us, and could adversely affect our ability to raise capital for future investment funds.
The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any ofreturns expected on an investment in our common stock.
Our asset management business depends in large part on our ability to raise capital from third-party investors. If we are unable to raise capital from third-party investors, we would be unable to collect management fees or deploy their capital into investments and potentially collect carried interest, which couldwould materially reduce our revenue earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospectscondition.
We have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and condition.type of investment products we offer to retail investors, which could expose us to new and greater levels of risk.
Our business is materially affected by conditions ininvestors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the global financial markets and economic conditions or events throughout the world that are outsideterms of our control, including, but not limitedfuture funds may be less favorable to changes in interest rates, availability of credit, inflation rates, economic uncertainty, slowdown in global growth, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation and regulations on the financial industry), disease, trade barriers, commodity prices, currency exchange rates and controls and national and international political circumstances (including wars, terrorist acts or security operations). These factors may affect the level and volatility of securities prices and the liquidity and the value of investments, and we may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to these market conditions and/or other events. In the event of a market downturn, eachus than those of our businesses could be affected in different ways.
Over the twelve months ending in January 2018, the S&P 500 and many other global stock market indexes returned nearly 25%, pushing public stock market multiples to near 17-year highs. At the start of February, the markets experienced a heightened level of volatility in connection with a widespread sell-off. The sell-off has been broad-based across equity sectors and regions, sending indexes in the U.S. and Asia into correction territory amid declines of at least 10% from a recent peak. The stock market correction has come despite strong growth in corporate earnings and upward revisions to forward-looking earnings estimates. As a result, bonds have also declined in value and this sell-off bears some similarities to the “taper tantrum” of 2013, when the market value of both the 10-year Treasury and S&P 500 declined by 6% on fears that the United States Federal Reserve would tighten policy more than previously anticipated. When the United States Federal Reserve clarified its policy intentions, stock and bond markets stabilized. It is possible, however, that the recent market volatility does not subside. If the global markets do not stabilize, it is possible sellers may readjust their valuations and attractive investment opportunities may become available. On the other hand, the valuations of certain assets we planned to sell in the near future could be negatively impacted.

Market volatilityexisting funds, which could adversely affect our fundraising effortsrevenues.
Valuation methodologies for certain assets in several ways. Investors often allocate to alternative asset classes (including private equity) based on a target percentage of their overall portfolio. Ifour funds can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of an investor’s portfolio decreases as a whole, the amount availableassets established pursuant to allocate to alternative assets (including private equity)such methodologies may be incorrect, which could decline. Further, investors often evaluate the amount of distributions they have received from existing funds when considering commitments to new funds. General market volatility and/or a reduction in distributions to investors could cause investors to delay making new commitments to investment funds. With several large buyout fundsresult in the market, a decrease in the amount an investor commits to our funds could have an impact on the ultimate sizemisstatement of the fund performance and amount of management fees we generate.accrued performance allocations.

The availability and cost of financing for significant acquisition and disposition transactions could be impacted by heightened concerns around increases in interest rates. In the United States, short-term interest rates have risen by 90 to 120 basis points (bps) since the U.S. presidential election in November 2016, with 10 to 20 bps of such amount attributable to increases seen between January 1, 2018 and February 8, 2018. The increase in base interest rates (Treasury and swaps) has not yet materially affected the interest rates on speculative grade debt because credit spreads had been tightening over the past year. However, if credit markets continue to weaken, it is possibledue diligence process that we andundertake in connection with investments by our investment funds may not reveal all facts that may be able to consummate significant acquisition and disposition transactions on acceptable terms or at all if we or our funds are unable to finance these types of transactions on attractive terms or if the counterparty to the transaction is unable to secure suitable financing. If there is a general slowdownrelevant in global merger and acquisition activity due to the lack of availability of suitable financing, this could cause a slowdown in our investment pace, which in turn could haveconnection with an adverse impact on our ability to generate future performance fees and to fully invest the available capital in our funds and reduce opportunities to exit and realize value frominvestment.

27






our fund investments. A slowdown in the deployment of our available capital could also adversely affect our ability to raise and the timing of raising successor investment funds. In 2017, we invested a record $22 billion through our carry funds.

During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns (which may occur across one or more industries or geographies), our funds’ portfolio companies may experience adverse operating performance, decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. Negative financial results in our funds’ portfolio companies may result in less appreciation across the portfolio and lower returns in our funds, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to raise new funds as well as our operating results and cash flow. During such periods of weakness, our funds’ portfolio companies may also have difficulty expanding their businesses and operations or meeting their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including expenses payable to us. Furthermore, such negative market conditions could potentially result in a portfolio company entering bankruptcy proceedings, or in the case of certain real estate funds, the abandonment or foreclosure of investments, thereby potentially resulting in a complete loss of the fund’s investment in such portfolio company or real assets and a significant negative impact to the fund’s performance and consequently our operating results and cash flow, as well as to our reputation. In addition, negative market conditions would also increase the risk of default with respect to investments held by our funds that have significant debt investments, such as our Global Credit funds.
Finally, during periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, our fund investment performance could suffer, resulting in, for example, the payment of less or no performance fees to us or the creation of the obligation to repay performance fees previously received by us. The payment of less or no performance fees could cause our cash flow from operations to significantly decrease, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity position and the amount of cash we have on hand to conduct our operations and to distribute to our unitholders. The generation of less performance fees could also impact our leverage ratios and compliance with our term loan covenants. Having less cash on hand could in turn require us to rely on other sources of cash (such as the capital markets, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all) to conduct our operations, which include, for example, funding significant general partner and co-investment commitments to our carry funds. Furthermore, during adverse economic and market conditions, we might not be able to renew or refinance all or part of our credit facility or find alternate financing on commercially reasonable terms. As a result, our uses of cash may exceed our sources of cash, thereby potentially affecting our liquidity position.
Changes in the debt financing markets or higher interest rates could negatively impact the ability of certain of our funds and their portfolio companies to obtain attractive financing or re-financing and could increase the cost of such financing if it is obtained, which could lead to lower-yielding investments and could potentially decrease our net income.
A significant contractionOur funds invest in relatively high-risk, illiquid assets, and we may fail to realize any profits from these activities for a considerable period of time or lose some or all of our principal investments.
Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the market for debt financing, such as the contraction that occurredUnited States.
Certain of our fund investments may be concentrated in 2008 and 2009,particular asset types or other adverse change relatinggeographic regions, which could exacerbate any negative performance of those funds to the terms of debt financing, including higher interest ratesextent those concentrated investments perform poorly.
Our private equity funds’ performance, and equity requirementsour performance, has been and more restrictive covenants, could have a material adverse impact on our business and that of our investment funds and their portfolio companies. Regulatory changes that constrain banks’ ability to provide debt financing also could have a material adverse impact on our business and that of our investment funds and their portfolio companies. If our funds are unable to obtain committed debt financing for potential acquisitions or are only able to obtain debt financing at unfavorable interest rates or on unfavorable terms, our funds may have difficulty completing acquisitions that may have otherwise been profitable or if completed, such acquisitions could generate lower than expected profits, both of which could lead to a decrease in our net income. Starting in the third quarter of 2015 and continuing through the first quarter of 2016, we experienced a period of elevated pricing for, and more limited access to, the high yield debt used in many of our buyout transactions. During that period, it was widely reported that the banks that committed to finance certain debt related to a large acquisition by one of our investment funds were unable to syndicate the debt because credit markets weakened and investor demand for financing waned. Due to unfavorable market conditions, our investment funds paid higher interest rates than originally anticipated, though the total amount of debt required for the transaction was reduced. At this point, we have seen a modest impact on the debt financing markets in response to the recent market sell-off. It is possible, however, that the debt financing markets couldfuture be adversely impacted.
Our funds’ portfolio companies also regularly utilizeaffected by the corporate debt markets to obtain financing for their operations. Starting in the second quarter of 2017 and throughout 2017, credit has been available on increasingly attractive terms. In early February, we have seen a modest weakening in credit markets. It is possible that future tightening in the credit markets could render debt financing difficult to obtain, less attractive or more expensive, which may negatively impact the operatingfinancial performance of our portfolio companies who use debtand the industries in which our funds invest.

Industry Risks Related to the Assets We Manage
Our real estate funds are subject to risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
Our energy business is involved in oil and gas investments (i.e., exploration, production, storage, transportation, logistics, refining, marketing, trading, petrochemicals, energy services and other opportunistic investments), which entail a high degree of risk.
Investments in the natural resources industry, including the infrastructure and power industries, involve various operational, construction and regulatory risks.
Our CLO business and investment into CLOs involves certain risks.
3


Investments in the insurance industry (including our investment in Fortitude) could be adversely impacted by insurance regulations and potential regulatory reforms.
Our Global Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may decline due to the large number of shares of common stock eligible for future sale.
Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.
Our founders have the right to designate members of our Board of Directors.
Our certificate of incorporation does not limit the ability of our former general partner, founders, directors, officers or stockholders to compete with us.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that stockholders might consider favorable.
Risks Related to Taxation
Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments (companies) or fund income.
U.S. and foreign tax regulations could adversely affect our ability to raise funds from certain foreign investors and increase compliance costs.
On January 1, 2020, we completed our conversion from a Delaware limited partnership named The Carlyle Group L.P. into a Delaware Corporation named The Carlyle Group Inc. Pursuant to the conversion, at the specified effective time on January 1, 2020, each common unit of The Carlyle Group L.P. outstanding immediately prior to the effective time converted into one share of common stock of The Carlyle Group Inc. and each special voting unit and general partner unit was canceled for no consideration. In addition, holders of the partnership units in Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P., and Carlyle Holdings III L.P. exchanged such units for an equivalent number of shares of common stock and certain other restructuring steps occurred (the conversion, together with such restructuring steps and related transactions, the “Conversion”).
    Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this report to “Carlyle,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer (i) prior to the consummation of the Conversion to The Carlyle Group L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries and (ii) from and after the consummation of the Conversion to The Carlyle Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to our common stock or shares in periods prior to the Conversion refer to the common units of The Carlyle Group L.P. When we refer to our “senior Carlyle professionals,” we are referring to the partner-level personnel of our firm. References in this report to the ownership of the senior Carlyle professionals include the ownership of personal planning vehicles of these individuals. When we refer to the “Carlyle Holdings partnerships” or “Carlyle Holdings,” we are referring to Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P., and Carlyle Holdings III L.P., which prior to the Conversion were the holding partnerships through which the Company and our senior Carlyle professionals and other holders of Carlyle Holdings partnership units owned their respective interests in our business.
“Carlyle funds,” “our funds” and “our investment funds” refer to the investment funds and vehicles advised by Carlyle.
“Carry funds” generally refers to closed-end investment vehicles, in which commitments are drawn down over a specified investment period, and in which the general partner receives a special residual allocation of income from limited partners, which we refer to as carried interest, in the event that specified investment returns are achieved by the fund. Disclosures referring to carry funds will also include the impact of certain commitments which do not earn carried interest, but are either part of, or associated with our carry funds. The rate of carried interest, as well as the share of carried interest allocated to Carlyle, may vary across the carry fund platform. Carry funds generally include the following investment vehicles across our three business segments:
Global Private Equity: Buyout, middle market and growth capital, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds advised by Carlyle, as well as certain energy funds advised by our strategic partner NGP Energy Capital Management (“NGP”) in which Carlyle is entitled to receive a share of carried interest (“NGP Carry Funds”)
Global Credit: Opportunistic credit, aircraft finance, and other closed-end credit funds advised by Carlyle
4


Global Investment Solutions: Funds and vehicles advised by AlpInvest Partners B.V. (“AlpInvest”), which include primary fund, secondary and portfolio financing, and co-investment strategies
Carry funds specifically exclude certain legacy Abingworth funds in which Carlyle is not entitled to receive a share of carried interest, collateralized loan obligation vehicles (“CLOs”), our business development companies and associated managed accounts, as well as capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude (defined below) alongside a carry fund.
For an explanation of the fund acronyms used throughout this Annual Report, refer to “Item 1. Business–Our Global Investment Offerings.”
“Fee-earning assets under management” or “Fee-earning AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise from which we derive recurring fund management fees. Our Fee-earning AUM is generally based on one of the following, once fees have been activated:
(a)the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired and for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period;
(b)the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co-investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired, as well as one of our business development companies;
(c)the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our CLOs and other securitization vehicles, as defined in the fund indentures (typically exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date;
(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(e)the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement;
(f)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), excluding cash and cash equivalents, of one of our business development companies and certain carry funds; or
(g)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired.
“Assets under management” or “AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise. Our AUM equals the sum of the following:
(a) the aggregate fair value of our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those funds and vehicles (including Carlyle commitments to those funds and vehicles and those of senior Carlyle professionals and employees) pursuant to the terms of their operations. This may result in a negative impact oncapital commitments to those funds and vehicles;
(b)     the investment returnsamount of our funds. In addition, if market conditions make it difficultaggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or impossible to refinance debt that is maturing in the near term, some of our portfolio companies’ operations may be negatively impacted or our portfolio companies may be unable to repay their debt at maturity and may be forced to sell assets, undergo a recapitalization or seek bankruptcy protection.

28







Our use of leverage may expose us to substantial risks.
We use indebtedness as a means to finance our business operations, which exposes us to the risks associated with using leverage.  We are dependent on financial institutions extending credit to us on reasonable terms to finance our business. There is no guarantee that such institutions will continue to extend credit to us or will renew the existing credit agreements we have with them, or that we will be able to refinance our outstanding notes or other obligations when they mature. In addition, the incurrence of additional debt in the future could result in downgrades of our existing corporate credit ratings, which could limit the availability of future financing and/or increase our cost of borrowing. As borrowings under our credit facility or any other indebtedness mature, we may be required to either refinance them by entering into a new facility, which could result in higher borrowing costs, issuing additional debt or issuing additional equity, which would dilute existing unitholders. We could also repay them by using cash on hand, cash provided by our continuing operations or cash from the sale of our assets, which could reduce distributions to our unitholders. We could have difficulty entering into new facilities or issuing debt or equity securities in the future on attractive terms, or at all.
From time to time we may access the capital markets by issuing debt securities. For example, in January 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of ten-yearthe notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions);
(c)     the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(d)        the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement; and
(d)     the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of our business development companies, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles.
    We include in our calculation of AUM and Fee-earning AUM the Legacy Energy Funds (defined below) that we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (“Riverstone”) and the NGP Carry Funds that are advised by NGP. Our calculation of AUM also includes third-party capital raised for the investment in Fortitude through a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund and from a strategic investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside the fund. The total AUM and Fee-earning AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude is inclusive of the net asset value of
5


investments in Carlyle products. These amounts are also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested.
    For most of our carry funds, total AUM includes the fair value of the capital invested (among other elements as described above). Fee-earning AUM includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital, depending on whether the original investment period for the fund has expired, which does not reflect any net appreciation in the value of capital invested by such carry funds. As such, total AUM may be greater than Fee-earning AUM when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments exceeds the cost of those investments.
    Our calculations of AUM and Fee-earning AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. In addition, our calculation of AUM (but not Fee-earning AUM) includes uncalled commitments to, and the fair value of invested capital in, our investment funds from Carlyle and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to management or performance fees. Our calculations of AUM or Fee-earning AUM are not based on any definition of AUM or Fee-earning AUM that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage or advise.
“Perpetual Capital” refers to the assets we manage or advise which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors upon the realization of investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law. Perpetual Capital may be materially reduced or terminated under certain conditions, including reductions from changes in valuations and payments to investors, including through elections by investors to redeem their investments, dividend payments, and other payment obligations, as well as the termination of or failure to renew the respective investment advisory agreements. Perpetual Capital includes: (a) assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, (b) our Core Plus real estate fund, (c) our business development companies and certain other direct lending products, and (d) our Interval Fund.
“Fortitude” refers to Fortitude Group Holdings, LLC (“Fortitude Holdings”) prior to October 1, 2021 and to FGH Parent, L.P. (“FGH Parent”) as of October 1, 2021. On October 1, 2021, the owners of Fortitude Holdings contributed their interests to FGH Parent such that FGH Parent became the direct parent of Fortitude Holdings. Fortitude Holdings owns 100% of the outstanding common shares of Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled reinsurer (“Fortitude Re”). See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the Company’s strategic investment in Fortitude.
“Legacy Energy Funds” include Energy III, Energy IV, and Renew II and are managed with Riverstone and its affiliates. Affiliates of both Carlyle and Riverstone act as investment advisers to each of the Legacy Energy Funds. Carlyle has a minority representation on the management committees of Energy IV and Renew II. Carlyle and Riverstone each hold half of the seats on the management committees of Energy III. The investment periods for these funds have expired and the remaining investments in each fund are being disposed of in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2022, the Legacy Energy Funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $0.2 billion in AUM and $0.4 billion in Fee-earning AUM. We are no longer raising capital for the Legacy Energy Funds and expect these balances to continue to decrease over time as the funds wind down.
“Metropolitan” or “MRE” refers to Metropolitan Real Estate Management, LLC, which was included in the Global Investment Solutions business segment prior to its sale on April 1, 2021.
6


PART I.
ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
Overview
    Carlyle is a global investment firm with deep industry expertise that deploys private capital across three business segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions. Our teams invest across a range of strategies that leverage our deep industry expertise, local insights, and global resources to deliver attractive returns throughout an investment cycle. Since our firm was founded in Washington, D.C. in 1987, we have grown to manage $373 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2022. Our experienced and diverse team of more than 2,100 employees includes more than 770 investment professionals in 29 offices across five continents, and we serve more than 2,900 active carry fund investors from 88 countries.
    We seek to invest with a clarity of purpose, adaptability, and alignment between our interests and the interests of our fund investors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. We continue to execute against our strategy, with a focus on the following priorities:
Grow our business. We pursue new opportunities, both organic and inorganic, that build on our strengths in our three global business segments and further diversify our product offerings.
Scale our platform. We identify strategies and opportunities that enable us to further scale our business, often in adjacent opportunities, such as Capital Markets and Insurance Solutions.

Drive efficiencies across our business. We seek ways to optimize our investment process by focusing on the development of our people, continuous process improvement and unlocking the value of our data.
    Operational and strategic highlights for our firm for 2022 include:
Assets under management grew 24% to $373 billion as of December 31, 2022 from $301 billion as of December 31, 2021, and fee-earning assets under management increased 38% to $267 billion, reflecting fundraising of $29.9 billion, as well as the impact of the strategic transactions outlined below. Perpetual Capital products now comprise $58 billion, or 22%, of our fee-earning assets under management.
During 2022, we completed the following transactions with the goal of driving accretive growth on an inorganic basis:
In March 2022, we acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”), totaling $15 billion in assets under management which were integrated into our Global Credit platform.
In April 2022, we entered into a strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude to provide certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services. As of December 31, 2022, we had $46 billion of Perpetual Capital associated with the agreement, on which we earn a recurring management fee.
In August 2022, we acquired Abingworth, a life sciences investment firm, to expand our healthcare investment platform with the addition of nearly $2 billion in assets under management and a specialized team of over 20 investment professionals and advisors.
We invested $34.8 billion in our carry funds during 2022 and realized proceeds of $33.8 billion for our carry fund investors. Our net accrued performance revenues increased to $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2022 from $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2021, despite realizing $1.0 billion in realized net performance revenues during the year, driven by carry fund appreciation of 11%, which reflects the strength of our portfolio construction, as well as the value creation activities in our portfolio.
We remained focused on the professional development and the health and well-being of our employees in 2022. We continued to roll out several leadership development programs and implemented a well-being strategy focused on enabling employees to foster emotional, physical, financial, environmental, and social well-being.
7


During 2022, with feedback received from employee surveys, we continued to reimagine our processes, office environment and business operations.
We continued to significantly enhance our ESG and DEI efforts:
We became a signatory of the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, and remain involved with several important industry initiatives in the field, including, among others, the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, the International Sustainability Standards Board Investor Advisory Group (IIAG), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) Global Responsible Investment Steering Committee, and the One Planet Private Equity Funds initiative.
We held a Sustainability Workshop in May 2022 that welcomed more than 60 guests from our portfolio companies and included sessions on developing resilient climate strategies and leading practices for employee engagement.
We continued to deepen the integration of ESG within our investment teams and portfolio companies, with ESG assessments included in most Carlyle investment decisions using proprietary due diligence tools in our GPE and Global Credit segments.
We invested in enhancing DEI through our second year of the DEI Incentive Awards program, where we granted approximately $2 million in awards to 70 employees from around the globe who made an impact on DEI at Carlyle.

We launched the DEI Leadership Network, a coalition of portfolio company CEOs around the globe to develop a peer group for shared resources and insights that can help advance DEI within their respective companies.

Operational and strategic highlights for our three global business segments for 2022 include:
Global Private Equity (“GPE”):
During 2022, GPE invested $19.9 billion across the segment, including $14.5 billion in the Americas, $2.7 billion in Europe, and $2.7 billion in Asia.
Our GPE funds realized proceeds of $22.5 billion for our GPE carry fund investors in 2022, across a mix of trade-sales, public market block trades, recapitalizations, and dividends.
During 2022, we raised $10.6 billion in new capital commitments for our GPE funds, which included the launch of our fifth Europe technology fund (“CETP V”) and our second renewable energy fund (“CRSEF II”).
Global Credit:
In total, we raised $15.3 billion in new capital commitments to our Global Credit products during 2022, and doubled overall AUM to $146.3 billion, reflecting fundraising as well as the impact of the CBAM and Fortitude transactions on capital formation.
In our CLO business, we closed $2.7 billion of new CLOs in the U.S. and $1.2 billion of new CLOs in Europe during 2022. Including the impact of the CBAM transaction, we have $48.6 billion of total AUM across all of our CLOs at December 31, 2022, an increase in CLO AUM of 47% over 2021.
In Carlyle Aviation Partners, we completed the acquisition of AMCK Aviation’s portfolio of aircraft, including 145 narrow-body aircraft.
We had continued strength in direct lending, executing $3.9 billion of gross originations in 2022, which included originations from a newly launched evergreen fund (“CDLF”).
8


Global Investment Solutions:
During 2022, we raised $4.0 billion in capital commitments, including over $3.5 billion in capital commitments to separately managed accounts, and deployed $6.6 billion in investments across our Global Investment Solutions platform. Our portfolio appreciated 6% (4% excluding the positive impact of foreign currency translation) during the year and we realized proceeds of $7.2 billion for our Global Investment Solutions investors.
Business Segments
    We operate our business across three segments: (1) Global Private Equity, (2) Global Credit and (3) Global Investment Solutions. Information about our segments should be read together with “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Global Private Equity
    Our GPE segment advises our buyout, growth, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds. Across our GPE funds, as of December 31, 2022, we had investments in more than 300 active portfolio companies that employ more than 1.3 million people around the world. Our GPE teams have the following areas of focus:
Corporate Private Equity. Our corporate private equity teams advise a diverse group of funds that invest in transactions that focus either on a particular geography or strategy. Our buyout funds focus on corporate buyouts and strategic minority investments. The investment mandate for our growth capital funds is to seek out companies with the potential for disruptive growth. Our core strategy seeks longer duration private equity opportunities, targeting stable businesses with sustainable market leadership, which have opportunities for operational improvement. Our corporate private equity funds are advised by teams of local professionals who live and work in the markets where they invest. In 2022, we invested $12.8 billion in new and follow-on investments through our corporate private equity funds. As of December 31, 2022, our corporate private equity funds had, in the aggregate, $105.4 billion in AUM.
Real Estate. Our real estate team advises real estate funds that invest in the U.S. and Europe, with a focus on a broad range of opportunities including residential properties, senior living facilities, industrial properties, and self-storage properties, but have limited our exposure to office buildings, hotels and retail properties. Our real estate funds generally focus on acquiring single-property assets rather than large-cap companies with real estate portfolios and made more than 1,450 investments in more than 700 cities or metropolitan statistical areas around the world from inception through December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, our real estate funds managed, in the aggregate, $30.3 billion in AUM.
Infrastructure & Natural Resources. Our active infrastructure and natural resources funds focus on infrastructure and energy investing. Our infrastructure business is comprised of teams that invest in six primary sectors: renewables, energy infrastructure, water and waste, transportation, digital infrastructure, and power generation. Our energy activities focus on buyouts, growth capital investments and strategic joint ventures in the midstream, upstream, downstream, energy and oilfield services sectors around the world. Our international energy investment team focuses on investments across the energy value chain outside of North America. We conduct our North American energy investing through our strategic investment in NGP, a Texas-based energy investor. As of December 31, 2022, we managed $27.3 billion in AUM through our infrastructure and natural resources funds.
The following table presents certain data about our Global Private Equity segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).
AUM(1)
% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Active
Investments
Active
Funds(3)
Available
Capital
Investment
Professionals(2)
Amount Invested
Since Inception
Investments Since
Inception
$16344%$10886871$39442$2162,436
9


(1)Total AUM includes NGP, which advises seven funds with $12.7 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2022. Through our strategic partnership with NGP, we are entitled to 55% of the management fee-related revenue of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP Energy Funds, and an allocation of income related to the carried interest received by the fund general partners of the NGP Carry Funds.
(2)Total GPE investment professionals excludes NGP employees.
(3)Active GPE funds includes seven NGP Carry Funds advised by NGP. We do not control NGP, and we do not serve as an investment adviser to the NGP funds.
Global Credit
    Our Global Credit segment, which had $146.3 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2022, advises products that pursue investment strategies across the credit spectrum, including: liquid credit, illiquid credit, and real assets credit, as well as platform initiatives such as Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund (“CTAC,” or the “Interval Fund”). Global Credit, which also includes our Insurance Solutions and Global Capital Markets businesses, has been Carlyle’s fastest-growing segment in the past four years, with total AUM nearly doubling in 2022 alone. Since our establishment in 1999, these various capital sources provide the opportunity for Carlyle to offer highly customizable and creative financing solutions to borrowers to meet their specific capital needs. Carlyle draws on the expertise and underwriting capabilities of our 233 investment professionals and leverages the resources and industry expertise of Carlyle’s global network to provide creative solutions for borrowers.
    Primary areas of focus for our Global Credit platform include:
Liquid Credit
Loans and Structured Credit. Our structured credit funds invest primarily in performing senior secured bank loans through CLOs and other investment vehicles. In 2022, in addition to our acquisition of the management contracts on the CBAM portfolio, we closed six new U.S. CLOs and three CLOs in Europe with an aggregate size of $2.7 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, our loans and structured credit team advised structured credit funds totaling $50.4 billion in AUM.
Illiquid Credit
Direct Lending. Our direct lending business includes our business development companies (“BDCs”) that invest primarily in middle market first-lien loans (which include unitranche, “first out” and “last out” loans) and second-lien loans of middle-market companies, typically defined as companies with annual EBITDA ranging from $25 million to $100 million, that lack access to the broadly syndicated loan and bond markets. As of December 31, 2022, our direct lending investment team advised AUM totaling $9.4 billion.
Opportunistic Credit. Our opportunistic credit team invests primarily in highly-structured and privately-negotiated capital solutions supporting corporate borrowers through secured loans, senior subordinated debt, mezzanine debt, convertible notes, atand other debt-like instruments, as well as preferred and common equity. The team will also look to invest in special situations (i.e., event-driven opportunities that exhibit hybrid credit and equity features) as well as market dislocations (i.e., primary and secondary market investments in liquid debt instruments that arise as a rateresult of 3.875%temporary market volatility). In March 2013,certain investments, our funds may seek to restructure pre-reorganization debt claims into controlling positions in the equity of the reorganized companies. As of December 31, 2022, our opportunistic credit team advised products totaling $12.8 billion in AUM.
Real Assets Credit
Aircraft Finance. Carlyle Aviation Partners is our multi-strategy investment platform that is engaged in commercial aviation aircraft financing and investment throughout the commercial aviation industry. As of December 31, 2022, Carlyle Aviation Partners had approximately $11.5 billion in AUM across carry funds, securitization vehicles, liquid strategies, and other vehicles.
Infrastructure Debt. Our Infrastructure debt team invests primarily in directly originated and privately negotiated debt instruments related to global infrastructure projects, primarily in the power, energy, transportation, water/waste, telecommunications and social infrastructure sectors. The team focuses primarily on senior, subordinated, and mezzanine debt and seeks to invest primarily in developed markets within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”). As of December 31, 2022, our infrastructure debt team managed $3.7 billion in AUM.
10


Other Credit
Platform Initiatives. Our platform initiatives include CTAC, our closed-end interval fund which invests across Carlyle’s entire credit platform, as well as cross-platform separately managed accounts which are tailored to invest across Carlyle’s credit platform based on the specific investment needs of individual investors. These products also include structured solutions which focus on private, primarily investment-grade investments, backed by assets with contractual cash flows. As of December 31, 2022, the Global Credit platform initiatives represented $6.1 billion in AUM.
Insurance Solutions. Carlyle Insurance Solutions (“CIS”) combines our deep insurance expertise with portfolio construction capabilities, capital sourcing and asset origination strengths to provide comprehensive liability funding and reinsurance, asset management and advisory solutions for (re)insurance companies and fund investors. The CIS team oversees the investment in Fortitude, as well as the strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude. As of December 31, 2022, AUM related to capital raised from third-party investors to acquire a controlling interest in Fortitude was $5.7 billion. As of December 31, 2022, AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement was $45.2 billion, including the net asset value of investments in Carlyle products, which is also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested. Fortitude and certain Fortitude reinsurance counterparties have committed approximately $9.2 billion of capital to-date to various Carlyle strategies.
Global Capital Markets. Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) is a loan syndication and capital markets business that launched in 2018. The primary focus of GCM is to arrange, place, underwrite, originate and syndicate loans and underwrite securities of third parties and Carlyle portfolio companies through TCG Capital Markets and TCG Senior Funding. TCG Capital Markets is a FINRA registered broker dealer. GCM may also act as the initial purchaser of such loans and securities. GCM receives fees, including underwriting, placement, structuring, transaction and syndication fees, commissions, underwriting and original issue discounts, interest payments and other compensation, which may be payable in cash or securities or loans, in respect of the activities described above and may elect to waive such fees.
    The following table presents certain data about our Global Credit segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).     
AUM% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Active
Funds
Investment
Professionals
$14639%$121122233
Global Investment Solutions
    Our Global Investment Solutions segment, established in 2011, provides comprehensive investment opportunities and resources for our investors and clients to build private equity portfolios through fund of funds, secondary purchases or financings of existing portfolios and managed co-investment programs. Global Investment Solutions executes these activities through AlpInvest, one of the world’s largest investors in private equity.
    The primary areas of focus for our Global Investment Solutions teams include:

Private Equity Secondary and Portfolio Finance Investments. Funds managed by AlpInvest build an investment portfolio of private equity owned assets through the acquisition of limited partnership interests in the secondary market and other types of transactions such as fund recapitalizations, portfolio restructurings and spin-outs, and portfolio financings. Private equity investors who desire to sell or restructure their pre-existing investment commitments to a fund may negotiate to sell the fund interests to AlpInvest. In this manner, AlpInvest’s secondary and portfolio finance investments team provides the full range of liquidity and restructuring solutions from debt to equity for third-party private equity investors. As of December 31, 2022, our secondary and portfolio finance investments program totaled $21.0 billion in AUM.

Private Equity Co-investments. AlpInvest invests alongside other private equity and mezzanine funds in which it or certain AlpInvest limited partners typically has a primary fund investment throughout Europe, North America and Asia. These investments are generally made when an investment opportunity is too large for a particular fund and the sponsor of the fund therefore seeks to raise additional “co-investment” capital from sources such as AlpInvest. As of December 31, 2022, our co-investment programs totaled $17.2 billion in AUM.
11



Private Equity Fund Investments. Our fund of funds vehicles advised by AlpInvest make investment commitments directly to buyout, growth capital, venture and other alternative asset funds advised by other general partners. As of December 31, 2022, AlpInvest advised $25.1 billion in AUM in private equity fund investments.
    The following table presents certain data about our Global Investment Solutions segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).
AUM(1)
% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Fund 
Vehicles
Available
Capital
Investment
Professionals
Amount Invested
Since Inception
$6317%$38350$2096$87
(1)Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we issued $400 milliongenerally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to AlpInvest carry fund vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15% or, in some cases, 40% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).

Investment Approach
Global Private Equity
    The investment approach of our GPE teams is generally characterized as follows:
Consistent and Disciplined Investment Process. We believe our successful investment track record is the result, in part, of a consistent and disciplined application of our investment process. Investment opportunities for our GPE funds are initially sourced and evaluated by one or more of our deal teams. Deal teams consistently strive to be creative and look for deals in which we can leverage Carlyle’s competitive advantages, sector experience and the global platform. The due diligence and transaction review process places a special emphasis on, as appropriate and among other considerations, the reputation of a target company’s shareholders and management, the company’s or asset’s size and sensitivity of cash flow generation, the business sector and competitive risks, the portfolio fit, exit risks and other key factors specific to a particular investment. In evaluating each deal, we consider what expertise or experience we can bring to the transaction to enhance value for our investors. Each investment opportunity must secure approval from the investment committee of the applicable investment fund to move forward. To help ensure consistency, we utilize a standard investment committee process across our GPE funds, although NGP follows its own policies and procedures with respect to its advised funds. The investment committee approval process involves a detailed review of the transaction and investment thesis, business, risk factors and diligence issues, as well as financial models.
Distinctive Portfolio Construction Principles. We seek to proactively manage the construction of our portfolios through deliberate and thoughtful diversification across industries, geographies and cycles, and to avoid certain assets facing economic or industry headwinds. For example, our real estate portfolios have relatively little current exposure to commercial office properties, business hotels and retail properties.

Geographic- and Industry-Focused. We have developed a global network of local investment teams and have adopted an industry-focused approach to investing. Our extensive network of global investment professionals has the knowledge, experience and relationships on a local level that allows them to identify and take advantage of opportunities that may be unavailable to firms that do not have our global reach and resources. We believe that our global platform helps enhance all stages of the investment process, including by facilitating faster and more effective diligence, a deeper understanding of global industry trends and priority access to the capital markets. We have particular industry expertise in aerospace and government services, consumer, media and retail, financial services, healthcare, industrials, technology, real estate, natural resources and infrastructure. As a result, we believe that our in-depth knowledge of specific industries improves our ability to source and create transactions, conduct effective and more informed due diligence, develop strong relationships with management teams and use contacts and relationships within these industries to drive value creation.

Variable Deal Sizes and Creative Structures. We believe that having the resources to complete investments of varying sizes provides us with the ability to enhance investment returns while providing for prudent industry,
12


geographic and size diversification. Our teams are staffed not only to effectively pursue large transactions, but also other transactions of varying sizes. We often invest in smaller companies or single real estate transactions and this has allowed us to obtain greater diversity across our entire portfolio. Additionally, we may undertake large, strategic minority investments with certain control elements or private investment in public equity (PIPE) transactions in large companies with a clear exit strategy. In certain jurisdictions around the world, we may make investments with little or no debt financing and seek alternative structures to opportunistically pursue transactions. We generally seek to obtain board representation and typically appoint our investment professionals and advisors to represent us on the boards of the companies in which we invest. Where our funds, either alone or as part of a consortium, are not the controlling investor, we typically, subject to applicable regulatory requirements, acquire significant voting and other control rights with a view to securing influence over the conduct of the business.

Driving Value Creation. Our GPE teams seek to make investments in portfolio companies and assets in which our particular strengths and resources may be employed to their best advantage. Typically, as part of a GPE investment, our investment teams will prepare and execute a systematic value creation plan that is developed during a thorough due diligence effort and draws on the deep resources available across our global platform, specifically relying on:

Reach. Our global team and global presence enables us to support international expansion of our operating companies’ efforts and global supply chain initiatives.

Expertise. Our deep bench of investment professionals and industry specialists provide extensive sector-specific knowledge and local market expertise. Our investment teams benefit from best-in-class support services and infrastructure provided through the global Carlyle organization. Carlyle’s overall infrastructure and support services cover the full range of administrative functions, including fund management, accounting, legal and compliance, human resources, information technology, tax, and external affairs. Additionally, where appropriate we may seek to partner with third parties whose sector or market expertise may enhance our value creation in an investment. For example, in our U.S. real estate funds we may partner with joint venture partners or managers with significant operational expertise and/or deal sourcing capabilities.

Insights. To supplement our investment expertise, we have retained a group of more than 51 operating executives and advisors as independent consultants to work with our investment teams, provide board-level governance and support and advise our portfolio companies. These operating executives and advisors are typically former CEOs and other high-level executives of some of the world’s most successful corporations and currently sit on the boards of directors of a diverse mix of companies. Operating executives and advisors are independent consultants and are not Carlyle employees. Operating executives and advisors are often engaged by Carlyle primarily to assist with deal sourcing, due diligence and market intelligence. Operating executives and advisors may also be engaged and compensated by our portfolio companies as directors or to otherwise advise portfolio company management.

Data. The goal of our research function is to extract as much information as possible from our portfolio about the current state of the economy and its likely evolution over the near-to-medium term. Our corporate private equity investment portfolio includes 214 active corporate investments as of December 31, 2022, across a diverse range of industries and geographies that each generate multiple data points (e.g., orders, shipments, production volumes, occupancy rates, bookings). By evaluating this data on a systematic basis, we work to identify the data with the highest correlation with macroeconomic data and map observed movements in the portfolio to anticipated variation in the economy, including changes in growth rates across industries and geographies. We incorporate this proprietary data into our investment portfolio management strategy and exit decisions on an ongoing basis. We believe this robust data gives us an advantage over our peers who do not have as large of a global reach.
Talent and Organization Performance. Our investment professionals work to enhance leadership and organizational effectiveness through proprietary and third-party data-driven assessments, best-practice playbooks, and knowledge-sharing forums.
Pursuing Best Exit Alternatives. In determining when to exit an investment, our investment teams consider whether a portfolio company or asset has achieved its objectives, the financial returns (both gross MOIC and net IRR) and the appropriate timing in industry cycles and company or asset development to strive for the optimal value. Each fund’s investment committee approves all exit decisions.
13


Value Creation. Our Global Portfolio Solutions team helps to translate our collaborative culture into services and operational capabilities supporting our investment process and portfolio companies and assets. Our approach ensures that Carlyle’s global network, deep industry knowledge and operational expertise are used to support and enhance our investments.
Information Technology Resources. We have established an information technology capability that contributes to due diligence, portfolio company strategy and portfolio company operations. The capability includes dedicated information technology and business process resources, including assistance with portfolio company risk assessments and enhanced deal analytics.
Digital. Given the increasing importance of digital tools and resources across the global economy, we have established a dedicated group focused exclusively on identifying, developing and implementing digital transformation strategies to help drive growth, unlock value, and drive efficiencies across our portfolio companies.
Procurement. We have developed a leveraged purchasing effort to provide portfolio companies with effective sourcing programs with better pricing and service levels to help create operating value. This program seeks to drive down costs and provide better service on common indirect spend categories and disseminate best practices on managing functional spend in the areas of human capital management, employee benefits, corporate real estate, information technology and treasury and risk. As of December 31, 2022, over 150 portfolio companies are actively participating in the optional program, benefiting from more than 100 category arrangements and preferred vendor arrangements.
ESG. We are committed to the principle that building a better business means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest. As a responsible global organization dedicated to driving value by seeking to serve its stakeholders, Carlyle has made it a priority to invest in a framework and the necessary resources for understanding, monitoring and managing environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) risks and opportunities across our portfolio. We believe ESG provides an additional lens to help us assess and mitigate risks, and identify and capitalize on potential opportunities.
    Global Credit
    The investment approach of our Global Credit platform is generally characterized as follows:
Source Investment Opportunities. Our Global Credit team sources investment opportunities from both the primary and secondary markets through our global network and strong relationships with the financial community. We typically target portfolio companies that have a demonstrated track record of profitability, market leadership in their respective niche, predictable cash flow, a definable competitive advantage and products or services that are value-added to their customer base.

Conduct Fundamental Due Diligence and Perform Capital Structure Analyses. After an opportunity is identified, our Global Credit investment professionals conduct fundamental due diligence to determine the relative value of the potential investment and capital structure analyses to determine credit worthiness. Our due diligence approach typically incorporates meetings with management, company facility visits, discussions with industry analysts and consultants and an in-depth examination of financial results and projections. In conducting due diligence, our Global Credit team employs an integrated, cross-platform approach with industry-dedicated credit research analysts and non-investment grade expertise across the capital structure. Our Global Credit team also seeks to leverage resources from across the firm, utilizing information obtained from our nearly 300 active portfolio companies and lending relationships, 20 credit industry research analysts, and in-house government affairs and economic research teams. We utilize a proprietary ESG materiality assessment tool across our Global Credit platform to help our investment professionals efficiently understand a company’s or asset’s exposure to material ESG risks as part of the due diligence process.

Evaluation of Macroeconomic Factors. Our Global Credit team evaluates technical factors such as supply and demand, the market’s expectations surrounding a company and the existence of short- and long-term value creation or destruction catalysts. Inherent in all stages of credit evaluation is a determination of the likelihood of potential catalysts emerging, such as corporate reorganizations, recapitalizations, asset sales, changes in a company’s liquidity and mergers and acquisitions.
14



Risk Minimization. Our Global Credit team seeks to make investments in companies that are well-positioned to weather downturns and/or below-plan performance. The team works to structure investments with strong financial covenants, frequent reporting requirements and board representation, if possible. Through board representation or observation rights, our Global Credit team works to provide a consultative, interactive approach to equity sponsors and management partners as part of the overall portfolio management process. In our CLO business, our liquid credit team uses an in-house risk and analytics platform to monitor and analyze our portfolio, and repositions the portfolio as appropriate. The analytics platform is also used to generate sensitivity analysis for critical risk factors such as default rates, prepayment rates and liquidation prices.
    Global Investment Solutions
    Our Global Investment Solutions team aims to apply a wide array of capabilities to help clients meet their investment objectives. The investment approach of our Global Investment Solutions platform is generally characterized as follows:
Well-informed, Disciplined Investment Process: We follow a disciplined, highly-selective investment process and seek to achieve diversification by deploying capital across economic cycles, segments and investment styles. Our integrated and collaborative culture across our strategies, reinforced by investment in information technology solutions, provides deep insight into fund manager portfolios and operations to support our rigorous selection process.

Proactive Sourcing: AlpInvest’s extensive network of private equity managers across the globe positions us to identify investment opportunities that may be unavailable to other investors. Our investment strategy is defined by a strong belief that the most attractive opportunities are found in areas that are subject to fewer competitive pressures. As a result, our teams actively seek out proprietary investments that would otherwise be difficult for our investors to access alone.

Global Scale and Presence: Our scale and on-the-ground presence across three continents – Asia, Europe and North America – give us a distinct and comprehensive perspective on the private equity markets. Our stable, dedicated, and experienced teams have deep knowledge of their respective markets across the globe. We believe this enhances our visibility across the global investment market and provides detailed local information that enhances our investment evaluation process.

Our Global Investment Offerings
    The following table provides a breakout of the product offerings and related acronyms included in our total assets under management of $373 billion as of December 31, 2022 for each of our three global business segments (in billions):
Global Private Equity1
$163.1 Global Credit$146.3 
Corporate Private Equity$105.5 
Insurance 5
$51.4 
U.S. Buyout (CP)52.5 Liquid Credit$50.4 
Europe Buyout (CEP)11.5 U.S. CLOs37.1 
Asia Buyout (CAP)11.2 Europe CLOs11.4 
Carlyle Global Partners (CGP)6.5 Revolving Credit1.9 
Europe Technology (CETP)6.2 Illiquid Credit$22.2 
U.S. Growth (CP Growth / CEOF)4.2 Opportunistic Credit (CCOF / CSP)12.8 
Japan Buyout (CJP)3.4 
Direct Lending 6
9.4 
Life Sciences (ABV / ACCD)1.7 Real Assets Credit$16.1 
Other 2
8.3 Aviation (SASOF / CALF)11.5 
Real Estate$30.3 Infrastructure (CICF)3.7 
U.S. Real Estate (CRP)19.2 
Other 7
1.0 
Core Plus Real Estate (CPI)8.0 Platform Initiatives and Other Products$6.1 
International Real Estate (CER)3.1 Carlyle Tactical Private Credit (CTAC)2.0 
Infrastructure & Natural Resources$27.3 Other Platform Initiatives and Products4.1 
NGP Energy 3
12.7 Global Investment Solutions$63.3 
International Energy (CIEP)8.1 Secondary and Portfolio Finance Investments$21.0 
Infrastructure & Renewable Energy 4
6.5 Co-Investments$17.2 
Primary Fund Investments$25.1 
Note: All amounts shown represent total assets under management as of December 31, 2022, and totals may not sum due to rounding. In addition, certain carry funds included herein may not be included in fund performance if they have not made an initial capital call or commenced investment activity.
(1)Global Private Equity also includes assets under management in funds which we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (the “Legacy Energy funds”). The impact of these funds is no longer significant to our results of operations.
(2)Includes our Financial Services (CGFSP), Asia Growth (CAP Growth / CAGP), Sub-Saharan Africa Buyout (CSSAF), South America Buyout (CSABF), Peru Buyout (CPF), MENA Buyout and Ireland Buyout (CICF) funds, as well as platform accounts which invest across Corporate Private Equity strategies.
(3)NGP Energy funds are advised by NGP Energy Capital Management, LLC, a separately registered investment adviser. We do not serve as an investment adviser to those funds.
(4)Includes our Infrastructure (CGIOF), Renewable Energy (CRSEF) and Power funds (CPP / CPOCP).
(5)Includes Carlyle FRL, capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside Carlyle FRL, as well as the fair value of the general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude.
(6)Includes our business development companies (CSL / CARS) and our newly launched evergreen fund (CDLF).
(7)Includes our Energy Credit (CEMOF) and Real Estate Credit (CNLI) funds.
Organizational Structure
    On January 1, 2020, we completed our conversion from a Delaware limited partnership named The Carlyle Group L.P. into a Delaware corporation named The Carlyle Group Inc. Our common stockholders are entitled to one vote per share and to vote on all matters on which stockholders of a corporation are generally entitled to vote on under Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), including the election of our Board of Directors.
    In connection with the Conversion, senior Carlyle professionals and certain of the other former limited partners of Carlyle Holdings who became holders of shares of common stock in connection with the Conversion were generally required to grant an irrevocable proxy to Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., which is wholly owned by our founders and other senior Carlyle professionals. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Common Stock—Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.”

Limited Partner Relations
Our diverse and sophisticated investor base includes more than 2,900 active investors in our products located in 88 countries. Included among our many longstanding fund investors are pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies and high net worth individuals in the United States, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and South America.
We have a dedicated in-house investor relations group that strives to cultivate long-term, strategic partnerships with our limited partners. Our team combines strong segment sales with firm-level strategy and coordination to bring the best of Carlyle to our limited partners. Each segment team consists of a combination of geographically focused professionals and dedicated product specialists who collaborate to deliver on investor needs. Segment teams are supported by a central staff responsible for data analytics and additional fulfillment responsibilities. In addition, our Carlyle Private Wealth team is dedicated to fundraising in the private wealth channel globally, and is organized regionally within each of its three constituent segments: Family Wealth, Wealth Management and National Accounts.
Our Investor Relations professionals are in regular dialogue with our fund investors, enabling us to monitor investor preferences and tailor future fund offerings to meet investor demand. We seek to secure a first-mover advantage with key investors, often by establishing a local presence and providing a broad and diverse range of investment opportunities. We continually endeavor to expand our partnerships by sharing our insights and perspectives on the market and investment environment, as well as discussing how we can help the investor achieve their objectives. We continue to use technology to augment our fund transparency and communication around insights as well as facilitate consistent dialogue through both virtual and in-person meetings and events. This partnership approach to fundraising has been critical in raising $81.2 billion over the past two years.
As of December 31, 2022, approximately 94% of commitments (by dollar amount) were from investors who are committed to more than one product and approximately 76% of commitments (by dollar amount) were from investors who are committed to more than five products. We believe the loyalty of our carry fund investor base, as evidenced by our substantial number of multi-fund relationships, enhances our ability to raise new funds and successor funds in existing strategies.
Investor Services
    We have a team of 790 investor services professionals worldwide. The investor services group performs a range of functions to support our investment teams, LP relations group and the corporate infrastructure of Carlyle. Our investor services professionals provide an important control function, ensuring that transactions are structured pursuant to the partnership agreements, assisting in global regulatory compliance requirements and investor reporting to enable investors to easily monitor
15


the performance of their investments. We have devoted substantial resources to creating comprehensive and timely investor reports, which are increasingly important to our investor base. The investor services group also works closely with the investment teams throughout each fund’s lifecycle, from fund formation and investments to portfolio monitoring and fund liquidation. We maintain an internal global legal and compliance team, which includes 40 professionals and a government relations group of five professionals with a presence around the globe as of December 31, 2022.
Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds
    We conduct the sponsorship and management of our carry funds and other investment vehicles primarily through limited partnerships, which are organized by us, to accept commitments and/or funds for investment from institutional investors and high net worth individuals. In general, each investment fund that is a limited partnership, or “partnership” fund, has a general partner that is responsible for the management and operation of the fund’s affairs and makes all policy and investment decisions relating to the conduct of the investment fund’s business. Generally, the limited partners of such funds take no part in the conduct or control of the business of such funds, have no right or authority to act for or bind such funds and have no influence over the voting or disposition of the securities or other assets held by such funds, although such limited partners may vote on certain partnership matters including the removal of the general partner or early liquidation of the partnership by majority vote, as discussed below. Most of our funds also have an investor advisory committee, comprising representatives of certain limited partners, which may consider and/or waive conflicts of interest or otherwise consult with the general partner on certain partnership matters. In the case of certain separately managed accounts advised by us, the investor, rather than us, may control the asset or the investment decisions related thereto or certain investment vehicles or entities that hold or have custody of such assets.

    Each investment fund and in the case of our separately managed accounts, the client, engages an investment adviser. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. (“CIM”) or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates serves as an investment adviser for most of our carry funds and is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (“CGCIM”) is an affiliate of CIM and serves as investment adviser for most of our Global Credit carry funds, as well as two of our BDCs and the Interval Fund and is registered under the Advisers Act. The business of Carlyle Aviation Partners includes investment funds organized to invest in certain aviation-related securities and physical assets (including aircraft, engines and components), and certain of the advisers and general partners of such funds are currently not registered under the Advisers Act or otherwise operated in reliance on another entity’s registration under the Advisers Act. Our investment advisers are generally entitled to a management fee from each investment fund for which they serve as investment advisers. For a discussion of the management fees to which our investment advisers are entitled across our various types of investment funds, see “Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” below.
    Investment funds themselves typically do not register as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act” or the “Investment Company Act”), in reliance on Section 3(c) or Section 7(d) thereof. Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act exempts from the 1940 Act’s registration requirements investment funds whose securities, at the time of acquisition of such securities, are owned by “qualified purchasers” as defined under the 1940 Act who purchase their interests in a private placement. Section 3(c)(1) of the 1940 Act exempts from the 1940 Act’s registration requirements privately placed investment funds whose securities are beneficially owned by not more than 100 persons and who purchase their interests in a private placement. In addition, under certain current interpretations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Section 7(d) of the 1940 Act exempts from registration any non-U.S. investment fund all of whose outstanding securities are beneficially owned either by non-U.S. residents or by U.S. residents that are qualified purchasers and purchase their interests in a private placement. Certain of our investment funds, however, rely on other exemptions from the 1940 Act or register as investment companies under the 1940 Act or elect to be regulated as BDCs under the 1940 Act.
    The governing agreements of the vast majority of our investment funds provide that, subject to certain conditions, a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of third-party investors in those funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause and/or to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause. In addition, the governing agreements of many of our investment funds generally require investors in those funds to affirmatively vote to continue the commitment period in the event that certain “key persons” in our investment funds do not provide the specified time commitment to the fund or our firm ceases to control the general partner (or similar managing entity) or the investment adviser or ceases to hold a specified percentage of the economic interests in the general partner (any such events, a “Key Person Event”).
    With limited exceptions, our carry funds, BDCs, Interval Fund, NGP Predecessor Funds, and certain other investment vehicles, are closed-end funds. In a closed-end fund structure, once an investor makes an investment, the investor is generally not able to withdraw or redeem its interest, except in very limited circumstances. Furthermore, the governing agreement of each investment vehicle contains restrictions on an investor’s ability to transfer its interest in the fund. In the open-end funds we advise, investors’ interests are usually locked up for a period of time after which investors may generally redeem their interests on a quarterly basis, to the extent that sufficient cash is available.
16


    With respect to our closed-end Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds, investors generally agree to fund their commitment over a period of time. For such carry funds, the commitment period generally runs until the earliest of (i) the sixth anniversary of either the effective date (as defined in the applicable limited partnership agreement), or the initial closing date; (ii) the fifth anniversary of the final closing date of the fund; (iii) the date the general partner cancels the investors’ obligation to fund capital contributions due to changes in applicable laws, business conditions or when at least a significant portion (which may range between 75% and 90%) of the capital commitments to the fund have been invested, committed or reserved for investments; (iv) the date a supermajority in interest (based on capital commitments) of investors vote to terminate the commitment period; or (v) the occurrence of a Key Person Event, unless upon any of these events the investors vote to continue the commitment period. Following the termination of the commitment period, an investor generally will be released from any further obligation with respect to its undrawn capital commitment except to the extent necessary to pay partnership expenses and management fees, fund outstanding borrowings and guarantees, complete investments with respect to transactions committed to prior to the end of the commitment period and make follow-on investments in existing investments (collectively, the “post-termination obligations”). Generally, an investor’s obligation to fund follow-on investments continues following the end of the commitment period, although certain funds do not have a time limit and there may be limitations on how much the fund is permitted to fund for such follow-on investments. In those funds where such limitations exist, they generally range from 15-20% of the fund’s aggregate capital commitment.
    For the latest generation of our closed-end real estate funds, the length of the commitment period varies from fund to fund, typically running for a period of between two and five years from the final closing date, provided that the general partner may unilaterally extend such expiration date for one year and may extend it for another year with the consent of a majority of the limited partners for that fund. Investors in the latest generation of our closed-end real estate funds are also obligated to continue to make capital contributions with respect to follow-on investments and to repay indebtedness for a period of time after the original expiration date of the commitment period, as well as to fund partnership expenses and management fees during the life of the fund.

    The term of each of the closed-end Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds generally will end 10 years from the initial closing date, or in some cases, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances (e.g., six years, in the case of certain Carlyle Aviation Partners funds) or later if extended by the general partner (in many instances with the consent of a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of the investors or the investment advisory committee) for successive one-year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Certain of such investment funds may have a longer initial termination date (such funds, “longer-dated funds”), such as 15 years from the final closing date, or may be open-ended.
    With respect to our Global Investment Solutions vehicles and separately managed accounts, the commitment period generally runs for a period of one to five years after the initial closing date of the vehicle. The term of each of the funds generally will end 8 to 12 years from the initial closing date. In some cases, the termination date may be later if extended by the general partner (in many instances with the consent of a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of the investors or the investment advisory committee) for successive up to three-year periods, or until such time as is reasonably necessary for the general partner to be able to liquidate the fund’s assets.
Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure
    Fund Management Fees. We provide management services to funds in which we hold a general partner interest or with which we have an investment advisory agreement. For closed-end carry funds in the Global Private Equity and Global Credit segments, management fees generally range from 1.0% to 2.0% of commitments during the fund’s commitment period. With respect to Global Private Equity carry funds, such management fees are generally based on limited partners’ capital commitments to the funds and with respect to Global Credit carry funds, such management fees are generally based on limited partners’ invested capital. Following the expiration or termination of the commitment period, management fees generally are based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and the rate charged may also be reduced. These terms may vary for separately managed accounts, open-end funds and longer-dated carry funds and other closed end funds. The investment adviser will receive management fees during a specified period of time, which is generally ten years from the initial closing date, or, in some instances, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances or later if extended for successive one-year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Depending on the contracted terms of the investment advisory agreement and related agreements, these fees are generally called semi-annually in advance. For certain open-end and longer-dated carry funds, management fees are called quarterly in arrears over the life of the funds.
    Within the Global Credit segment, for CLOs and other structured products, management fees generally range from 0.4% to 0.5% based on the total par amount of assets or the aggregate principal amount of thirty-year seniorthe notes in the CLO and are due quarterly. Management fees for the CLOs and other structured products are governed by indentures and collateral management agreements. The investment advisers will receive management fees for the CLOs until redemption of the securities issued by the CLOs. Management fees for the BDCs are due quarterly in arrears at a annual rates that range from 1.00% of net asset value (as adjusted for capital called, dividends reinvested, distributions paid and issuer share repurchases made) to 1.5% of gross assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents). Management fees for the Interval Fund are due monthly in arrears at the annual
17


rate of 5.625%1.0% of the month-end value of the Interval Fund’s net assets. Carlyle Aviation Partners’ funds have varying management fee arrangements depending on the strategy of the particular fund. Under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, the Company earns a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability and which is due quarterly in March 2014, we issuedarrears.
    The investment advisers of our Global Investment Solutions carry funds generally receive an additional $200 million aggregate principal amountannual management fee that ranges from 0.25% to 1.0% of thirty-year senior notes at a ratethe fund’s capital commitments or its committed capital to investments during the commitment fee period of 5.625%. We may also accessthe relevant fund. Following the expiration of the commitment fee period, the management fees generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% on (i) net invested capital; (ii) the lower of cost or net asset value of the capital markets by issuing preferred units.invested; or (iii) the net asset value for unrealized investments. In September 2017, we issued 16,000,000 5.875% Series A Preferred Units. We also have a credit facility that providessome cases, management fees are charged based on net invested capital of underlying investments for a term loan (of which $25.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2017) and revolving credit borrowings that has a final maturity date of May 5, 2020. The credit facility contains financial and non-financial covenants with which we need to comply to maintain access to this source of liquidity. Non-compliance with anythe entire duration of the financial or non-financial covenants without cure or waiver would constituteapplicable Global Investment Solutions carry funds. The management fees we receive from our Global Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles typically are payable quarterly in advance.
    Our equity interest in NGP entitles us to an eventallocation of default, and an event of default resulting from a breach of certain financial or non-financial covenants could result, at the optionincome equal to 55% of the lenders, in an accelerationmanagement fee-related revenues of the principal and interest outstanding, and a termination of the revolving credit facility. In addition,NGP entities that serve as advisors to the extent we incur additional debt relativeNGP Energy Funds.
    The general partners or investment advisers to certain of our current levelGlobal Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds from time to time receive customary transaction fees upon consummation of earnings or experience a decrease inmany of our levelfunds’ acquisition transactions, receive monitoring fees from many of earnings, our credit rating could be adversely impacted, which would increase our interest expense under our credit facility. In September 2017their portfolio companies following acquisition and may from time to time receive other fees in connection with their activities. The ongoing monitoring fees that they receive are generally calculated either as a fixed amount or as a percentage of a specified financial metric of a particular portfolio company. The transaction fees that they receive are generally calculated either as a fixed amount or as a percentage (that generally ranges up to 1%, but may exceed 1% in certain circumstances) of the total enterprise value or capitalization of the investment. The management fees charged to investors in our issuancecarry funds are generally reduced by 80% to 100% of Series A Preferred Units, Standard & Poor's downgradedthe allocable portions of such transaction fees, monitoring fees, and certain other fees that are received by the general partners and their affiliates. For our Long Term Issuer Default Ratingmost recent vintages, management fees are generally not offset by fees received by Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) in connection with capital markets activities.
    In addition, Carlyle Aviation Partners may receive servicing fees in connection with asset-backed financing transactions for certain Carlyle Aviation Partners funds, generally in the range of 2% of rents, incentive fees up to 5% of rents in the aggregate, and 3% of sales proceeds earned from "A-" to "BBB+" based primarily on its assessmentsuch assets. To the extent the financing instruments are held by the funds, these fees are generally offset against management fees or partnership expenses of the funds.
    Performance Allocations. The general partner of each of our leverage ratio. In October 2017, Fitch's reaffirmed its "BBB+" stable rating.
Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable, which makes it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis.
Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable. For example, our cash flow fluctuates because we receivecarry funds also receives carried interest from the carry funds. Carried interest entitles the general partner to a special residual allocation of profit on third-party capital. In the case of our closed-end carry funds, carried interest is generally calculated on a “realized gain” basis, and each general partner is generally entitled to a carried interest equal to 20% allocation (or approximately 2% to 12.5% in the case of most of our more mature Global Investment Solutions carry funds) of the net realized profit (generally taking into account unrealized losses) generated by third-party capital invested in such fund. Net realized profit or loss is not netted between or among funds. Our senior Carlyle professionals and other personnel who work in these operations also own interests in the general partners of our carry funds only when investments are realized and achieve a certain preferred return. We may also experience fluctuationswe generally allocate 45% of any carried interest that we earn to these individuals in order to better align their interests with our quarterlyown and annual results, including our revenue and net income, due to a numberwith those of other factors, including changesthe investors in the carrying values and performancefunds. A limited portion of the carried interest may be distributed to such individuals in shares of our funds’ investments that can result in significant volatility incommon stock. Of the carried interest that we have accrued (orretain, we utilize a portion for our new carried interest pool program that commenced in 2019 for certain of our employees who do not receive direct allocations of carried interest to further align their interests with those of our investors. For most carry funds, the carried interest is subject to an annual preferred return of 7% to 9% and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement). These terms may vary on longer-dated funds, certain credit funds, and our external co-investment vehicles. If, as a result of diminished performance of investments later in the life of a closed-end fund, the fund does not achieve investment returns that (in most cases) exceed the preferred return threshold or (in almost all cases) the general partner receives in excess of the allocated carried interest, we will be obligated to repay the amount by which the carried interest that was previously distributed to us exceeds amounts to which we have reversed prior accruals) from periodare ultimately entitled. This obligation, which is known as a “giveback” obligation, operates with respect to period, as well as changes ina given carry fund’s own net investment performance only and is typically capped at the after-tax amount of carried interest received by the general partner. Each recipient of carried interest distributions gains, dividendsis individually responsible for his or her proportionate share of any “giveback” obligation, and we have historically withheld a portion of the cash from carried interest paiddistributions to individuals as security for potential “giveback” obligations. However, we may guarantee the full amount of such “giveback” obligation in respect of investments, changes in our operating expenses,amounts received by Carlyle and certain other amounts. With respect to the degree to which we encounter competition and general economic and market conditions. The valuations of investments made by our funds could also be impacted by changes, or anticipated changes, in government policy, including policies related to tax reform, financial services regulation, international trade, immigration, healthcare, labor, infrastructure and energy. For instance, during the 2008 and 2009 economic downturn, we recorded significant reductions in the carrying values of many of the investments of the investment funds we advise. The carrying value of fund investments, particularly the public portion of our carryany carried interest allocated to the firm, we expect to fund portfolios, may be more variable during times of market volatility. As of December 31, 2017, 14%any “giveback” obligation from available cash. Our ability to generate carried interest is an important element of our CPE, Real Assetsbusiness and Global Credit carry fund portfolio was in public securities, which is a decrease from 17% of this portfolio that was held in public securities at December 31, 2016. In addition, transaction fees earned by our carry funds can vary from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year depending on the nature of the investments in any given period. For example, in 2017, we earned approximately $27 million in transaction fees from our carry funds, which was a decrease of approximately $4 million as compared to the total transaction fees we earned in 2016 of approximately $31 million, but was still up significantly from the total transaction fees of approximately $10 million we earned in 2015. The decrease was due to greater investment activity, primarily in our U.S. buyout funds, in 2016 as compared to 2017. Going forward, we anticipate a general decline in net transaction fees earned as certain carry funds that are actively fundraising have increased the percentage of transaction fees that are shared with fund investors from 80% to 100% of the fees we generate. See “—A decline in the pace or size of investments by our carry funds could result in our receiving less revenue from transaction fees”. 
During periods in whichcarried interest has historically accounted for a significant portion of our AUM is attributable to carry funds that are in the fundraising period or are in the investment period that precedes harvesting, as has been the case from time to time, we may receive substantially lower distributions. During 2017, our fee-earning assets under management decreased as our existing fundsincome.

29






continued to harvest investments, and the capital that was raised for our successor funds has not yet been activated. Higher fundraising activity also generates incremental expenses and, as new capital commitments may not immediately generate fees until they activate management fees, which means that we could incur fundraising related costs ahead    The receipt of generating revenues. Moreover, even if an investment proves to be profitable, it may be several years before any profits can be realized in cash. A downturn in the equity markets also makes it more difficult to exit investments by selling equity securities at a reasonable value. If we were to have a realization event in a particular quarter, that event may have a significant impact on our quarterly results and cash flow for that particular quarter and may not be replicated in subsequent quarters. We cannot predict precisely when, or if, realizations of investments will occur, where a fund will be in its lifecycle when the realizations occur or whether a fund will realize carried interest.
We recognize revenue on investments in our investment funds based on our allocable share of realized and unrealized gains (or losses) reported by such investment funds, and a decline in realized or unrealized gains, or an increase in realized or unrealized losses, would adversely affect our revenue, which could further increase the volatility of our quarterly results and cash flow. Because our carry funds have preferred investor return thresholds that need to be met prior to us receiving any carried interest declines in or failures to increase sufficiently the carrying valuerespect of the investment portfolios of a carry fund may delay or eliminate any carried interest distributions paid to us with respect to that fund. This is because the value of the assets in the fund would need to recover to their aggregate cost basis plus the preferred return over time before we would be entitled to receive any carried interest from that fund or vehicle.
The timing and receipt of realized carried interest also varies with the life cycleinvestments of our carry funds and there is often a difference betweendictated by the time we start accruingterms of the partnership agreements that govern such funds, which generally allow for carried interest for financial reporting purposesdistributions in respect of an investment upon a
18


realization event after satisfaction of obligations relating to the return of capital from all realized investments, any realized losses, allocable fees and expenses and the realization and distribution of such carried interest. However, performance fees areapplicable annual preferred return. Carried interest is ultimately realized whenand distributed when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of,of; (ii) certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed,reimbursed; (iii) the investment fund’s cumulative net returns are in excess of the preferred returnreturn; and (iv) we have decided to collect carried interestcarry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. In decidingDistributions to eligible senior Carlyle professionals in respect of such carried interest are generally made shortly thereafter. Our decision to realize carried interest we considercarry considers such factors as the level of embedded valuation gains, the portion of the fund invested, the portion of the fund returned to limited partner investors and the length of time the fund has been in carry, andas well as other qualitative measures. When a fund enters into a position to takeOur Global Investment Solutions funds are not eligible for carried interest we are generally entitleddistributions until all capital contributions for investments and expenses and the preferred return hurdle have been returned. Although Carlyle has seldom been obligated to pay a disproportionate “catch-up” levelgiveback obligation, such obligation, if any, in respect of profit allocation for a period before the amount of profit allocation to which we are entitled returns to a more normalized level. For example, during the period from late 2013 to early 2015, we benefited from “catch-up”previously realized carried interest, on someis generally determined and due upon the winding up or liquidation of our largest funds, but in 2016 and 2017 we did not benefit from "catch-up" realized carried interesta carry fund pursuant to the extent we had in prior years. In certain circumstances, we may also need to reduce the amount of realized carried interest we receive in order to maintain a sufficient level of reserves and reduce the risk of potential future giveback obligations. Under the terms of the limitedfund’s partnership agreement, for CP Valthough in certain cases the giveback is calculated at prior intervals.
    With respect to our separately managed accounts, BDCs and the Interval Fund, carried interest is generally referred to as an “Incentive Fee.” Incentive Fees consist of performance-based incentive arrangements pursuant to management contracts when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. Incentive Fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved.
    Under our arrangements with the historical owners of Carlyle Aviation Partners, we are entitled to a carried interest equal to 20%100% of the realized profitsmanagement fee-related revenues and advisory fee-related revenues of Carlyle Aviation Partners that serve as advisers or service providers of the fund once a preferred return threshold has been met.Carlyle Aviation Partners funds and portfolios of investments. In 2017,addition, we decided to takewill receive 55% of the carried interest from profitable exits in this fund at a reduced ratefunds managed or advised by Carlyle Aviation Partners, with the remaining 45% being allocated to reserve for potential riskthe prior owners of Carlyle Aviation Partners and certain employees.
    With respect to our arrangements with NGP, we are entitled to an allocation of income equal to 47.5% of the carried interest received by NGP XI and future NGP funds. In addition, we hold an interest in the portfoliogeneral partner of the NGP X fund, which entitles us to an allocation of income equal to 40% of the carried interest received by NGP X’s general partner.
    Under our arrangements with the historical owners and reducemanagement team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to our fund of funds vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15%, or in some cases 40%, of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).
    As noted above, in connection with raising new funds or securing additional investments in existing funds, we negotiate terms for such funds and investments with existing and potential investors. The outcome of such negotiations could result in our agreement to terms that are materially less favorable to us than for giveback.prior funds we have advised or funds advised by our competitors. See “— Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
Capital Invested in and Alongside Our fee revenue may also depend on the paceInvestment Funds
    To further align our interests with those of investment activityinvestors in our funds. In many ofinvestment funds, we have invested our carry funds, the base management fee may be reduced when the fund has invested substantially all of its capital commitments or the aggregate fair market value of a fund’s investments is below its cost. We may receive a lower management fee from such funds if there has been a decline in value or after the investing period and during the period the fund is harvesting its investments. As a result, the variable pace at which many of our carry funds investown capital and dispose of investments may cause our management fee revenue to vary from one quarter to the next. Additionally, in certain of our funds that derive management fees only on the basis of invested capital, the pace at which we make investments, the length of time we hold such investment and the timing of dispositions will directly impact our revenues.
The investment period of a fund may expire prior to the raising of a successor fund. Where appropriate, we may work with our limited partners to extend the investment period, which gives us the opportunity to invest any capital that remains in the fund. In general, the end of the original investment period (regardless of whether it is extended) will trigger a change in the capital base on which management fees are calculated from committed capital to invested capital. In some cases, a step-down in the applicable rate used to calculate management fees may also occur. For example, prior to raising a successor fund, the South America buyout fund’s original investment period ended in the second half of 2015, resulting in a change from committed capital to invested capital for the management fee base, despite a one-year extension to the investment period.

30






We depend on our founders, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and other key personnel, and the loss of their services or investor confidence in such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on the efforts, skill, reputations and business contacts of our senior Carlyle professionals includingin and alongside the investment funds we sponsor and advise. Carlyle generally expects to commit to fund approximately 0.75% of the capital commitments to our founders, Messrs. Conway, D’Aniellofuture Global Private Equity and Rubenstein,Global Credit carry funds, although we may elect to invest additional amounts in funds focused on new investment areas. We also intend to make investments in our co-Chief Executive Officers, Messrs. Lee and YoungkinGlobal Investment Solutions carry funds, our open-end funds, our BDCs and other key personnel, including members1940 Act regulated vehicles and our CLO vehicles. In addition, certain qualified Carlyle professionals and other qualified individuals (including certain individuals who may not be employees of our Executive Group, our management committee,the firm but who have pre-existing business relationships with Carlyle or industry expertise in the sector in which a particular investment fund may be investing) are permitted, subject to certain restrictions, to invest alongside the investment committees offunds we sponsor and advise. Fees assessed or profit allocations on such investments by such persons may be eliminated or substantially reduced.
    Minimum general partner capital commitments to our investment funds and seniorare determined separately with respect to each investment teams, the information and deal flow they and others generate during the normal course of their activities and the synergies among the diverse fields of expertise and knowledge held byfund. We may, from time to time, exercise our professionals. On January 1, 2018, Kewsong Lee and Glenn Youngkin became Co-Chief Executive Officers of our firm, Messrs. Conway and Rubenstein transitionedright to be Co-Executive Chairmen and Mr. D'Aniello transitioned to be Chairman Emeritus. Mr. Conway also was joined by Peter Clare as Co-Chief Investment Officers as of January 1, 2018. Although our founders remain committed to our business, in these new roles, they will no longer have responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the firm and may choose to pursue philanthropic or other personal endeavors, including personal investment activities, in addition to their roles at Carlyle. Our founders and other key personnel are not obligated to remain employed with us in their current capacities or at all. To enhance our capabilities, we have and will continue to hire and internally develop senior professionals to assume key leadership positions throughout the firm into the future. The efficacy of such future leadership may constitute an adverse risk to our business.
All of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by our founders are vested. The majority of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units received by other key personnel (including Mr. Youngkin) at the time of the Partnership’s initial public offering are vested, with the unvested portion scheduled to vest in one remaining installment on May 2, 2018. Mr. Lee does not hold any Carlyle Holdings partnership units. In October 2017, we entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Lee and Youngkin. See "Part III. Item 11. Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control." Several key personnel have left the firm in the past and others may do so in the future, and we cannot predict the impact that the departure of any key personnel will have on our ability to achieve our objectives. The loss of the services of any of them could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, net income and cash flow and could harm our ability to maintain or grow AUM in existing funds or raisepurchase additional funds in the future. The governing agreements of many of our investment funds generally require investors in those funds to vote to continue the investment period in the event that certain "key persons"interests in our investment funds do not provide the specified time commitment to the fund or our firm ceases to control the general partner. We have historically relied in part on the interests of these professionalsthat become available in the investment funds’ordinary course of their operations. See Part II. Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information regarding our minimum general partner capital commitments to our funds. Our general partner capital commitments are funded with cash and not with carried interest or through a management fee waiver program.
19


Employees
    We believe that one of the strengths and incentive fees to discourage them from leavingprincipal reasons for our success is the firm. However, to the extentquality and dedication of our people. As of December 31, 2022, we employed more than 2,100 individuals, including over 770 investment funds perform poorly, thereby reducing the potential for carried interest and incentive fees, their interestsprofessionals, located in carried interest and incentive fees become less valuable to them and may become a less effective retention tool.29 offices across five continents.
One Carlyle Culture
Our senioremployees around the globe are united by our One Carlyle professionalsculture, which is driven by our mission to invest wisely and create value while delivering on our strategic plan to grow, build and perform. We seek to achieve our mission and deliver on our strategic plan by creating a culture where employees (1) strive to excel, (2) deliver for the firm, (3) challenge the status quo and (4) leverage diverse perspectives. We encourage our employees to leave their comfort zone and seek out a leading edge while working with passion, creativity and a relentless determination to deliver for our stakeholders. We seek to foster lateral working relationships across and beyond Carlyle while working as one team to drive long-term value creation. We strive to lead by example in driving and embracing change. We foster diverse perspectives by encouraging our employees to engage with others with candor and diversity of thought, promoting a team conscience that is inclusive and empowering.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We are committed to growing and cultivating an environment that fosters diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) and values the diverse perspectives, backgrounds, experiences and geographies of our employees and other stakeholders. We seek to promote greater diversity among our employees, enhance knowledge and understanding of key personnel possess substantial experienceDEI issues, reward progress on our DEI goals and expertisefoster an environment where our employees and have strong business relationships with investors instakeholders feel included and valued for their diverse experiences and perspectives. We strive to embed DEI into everything we do by leveraging our fundsspheres of influence. As we ignite action within Carlyle, our investments, and other members of the business community. As a result, the loss of these personnel could jeopardize our relationships with investors in our funds and members of the business community, and resultwe are making strides in DEI in the reduction of AUM or fewer investment opportunities. For example, if anynear term and laying the foundation for even greater impact into the future.
Carlyle. A focus on DEI efforts is embedded into the highest levels of our senior Carlyle professionals were to join or form a competing firm, that action could have a material adverse effect onincluding our business, resultsBoard of operationsDirectors, and financial condition. Furthermore, to the extent investors in certainis guided by our DEI Council, comprised of members of our open-ended products haveexecutive team, as well as key senior leaders across the abilityglobe. We strive to redeem their investment, the loss ofcreate a key manager could trigger redemptions and thus adversely impact the business.
Recruiting and retaining professionals may be more difficult in the future, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our most important asset is our people, and our continued success is highly dependent upon the efforts of our senior Carlyle professionals and other professionals we employ. Our future success and growth depends to a substantial degree on our ability to retain and motivate our senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel and to strategically recruit, retain and motivate new talented personnel, including new senior Carlyle professionals. The market for qualified investment professionals is extremely competitive and we may not be successful in our efforts to recruit, retain and motivate these professionals.
There are also certain factorsworkplace culture that are not within our control that may affect our efforts to recruit, retain and motivate investment professionals, in particular as it relates to tax considerations regarding carried interest. For example, if the U.S. Congress or state, local or certain foreign governments enacted legislation to treat carried interest as ordinary income rather than as capital gain for tax purposes or impose a surcharge on carried interest, this could result in a material increase in the amount of taxes that our unitholders would be required to pay, which would in turn affectenhances our ability to recruit, develop and retain talent from a broad set of backgrounds and motivateexperiences and, to this end, we asked all of our currentemployees to set a personal DEI objective beginning in 2021, a practice which we continued in 2022. Inclusive leadership is one of our core leadership competencies, and futurethe DEI Council is involved in reviewing the promotion process for our senior personnel. All of our employees who were nominated for promotion to a Managing Director or Partner role during 2022 were evaluated on their inclusive leadership and management skills. To continue to enhance inclusive decision-making, during 2022 we continued the “Better Decisions” initiative that launched in 2019, which provides education, practical tools and guidance to build awareness of unconscious bias and to mitigate its negative effects. Over 1,500 of our employees have participated in in-person or virtual sessions of this program. In addition to these initiatives, we encourage our employees to engage with and support one another through our global Employee Resource Groups, which include DiverseAbility, LGBTQ+, Multicultural, Veterans, Women, Working Parents and NextGen groups, that were formed to cultivate and retain a diverse, equitable and inclusive workforce.
During 2022, we invested in enhancing DEI through our second year of the DEI Incentive Awards program, pursuant to which we granted approximately $2 million in awards to 70 employees from around the globe who made an impact on DEI at Carlyle by developing our people, attracting and recruiting talent, building an inclusive culture and/or furthering board diversity at our portfolio companies. Award recipients were nominated by their peers, reviewed by group heads and confirmed by the DEI Council. We also launched the DEI Leadership Network, a coalition of portfolio company CEOs around the globe to develop a peer group for shared resources and insights that can help advance DEI within their respective companies.
Business and Community. The communities we touch provide us with an opportunity to drive change. As part of ongoing efforts to elevate DEI within our industry, Carlyle strives to improve diversity and promote an inclusive culture for women and underrepresented professionals within the industry. Carlyle is a founding signatory to the Institutional Limited Partners Association’s Diversity in Action initiative and has joined the Milken Institute as a strategic partner and first underwriter for the DEI in Asset Management Program, which was created to improve recruitment, retention and advancement for women and persons who are Black, Indigenous and People of Color within the asset management industry. In addition, we have received a perfect score for five consecutive years on the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index, which recognizes corporate efforts to support LGBTQ+ employees. Carlyle is also a member of the 30% Coalition, which works to achieve diversity in senior leadership and the corporate boardroom. Moreover, we have partnerships with organizations such as the 10,000 Black Interns Programme in the UK, Level 20, Out for Undergrad and the Diversity & Inclusion in Asia Network.

Employee Engagement

We routinely evaluate, modify, and enhance our internal processes and technologies to increase employee engagement, productivity and efficiency. During 2020, we introduced a robust feedback training and communication campaign to deliver
20


real-time feedback, as well as more frequent formal performance conversations and launched a new, more streamlined performance management system, which we continued into 2022. In order to measure employee engagement, we conduct an annual engagement survey as well as other pulse surveys throughout the year. We have continued to focus on the satisfaction and wellness of our employees over the past year, and we plan to continue to use annual and pulse surveys to evaluate our performance and guide our decision-making.

We are also continuing to expand our employee training programs, including those focused on enhancing management and leadership capability at all levels of the firm. These programs include the Future Leaders Academy for new Managing Directors, the Career Strategies Initiative for Vice President and Principal-level underrepresented professionals, which is a virtual sponsorship program for underrepresented professionals, the Leadership Principles program for Principals and Directors, the Better Leaders Program for Vice Presidents and Associate Directors and the Better Managers Program for Senior Associates, Associate Vice Presidents, Managers and Associates. We also continue to support a global mentoring program. In 2022, we launched MentorcliQ, a user-friendly platform that offers a personalized experience for mentees and mentors. We also conducted in-person analyst and associate training in August 2022 for our largest ever class of investment professionals. See “—Risks Related
Compensation and Benefits
We believe that equitable compensation and incentive programs are critical to hiring and retaining highly qualified people. We seek to provide a pay and benefits package that is competitive within the local marketplace for our industry to reward and retain our employees and attract and retain talent. Compensation comprises a base salary for salaried employees and compensation per hour for hourly employees in connection with satisfying the daily expectations of their roles. Our annual discretionary performance-based cash bonus program is a significant component of our compensation program and rewards employees based on firm, segment, investment fund, department and individual performance to directly align our employees with our financial performance and strategic goals. To further align the interests of our employees with our stockholders and to cultivate a strong sense of ownership and commitment to our firm, certain employees also are eligible to receive awards of restricted stock units and/or participate in our other long-term incentive programs.
The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our people. We are committed to their health, safety and wellness and seek to provide benefits that are locally relevant for our global employees. For example, our U.S. Taxation—Our structure involves complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. Our structure also isbenefits programs include health and welfare benefits (including healthcare, dental benefits and vision benefits, among others), retirement offerings (including employer matching contributions, subject to eligibility requirements), an Employee Assistance Program, family and caregiver-oriented benefits and commuting benefits, among other benefits. In addition, we have various time-off policies for eligible employees for sick leave, vacation leave, personal days, paid holidays and paid parental leave. We also seek to provide strong benefits programs globally in line with local market practices.
Consistent with our guiding principle that building better businesses means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest, we encourage our employees to get involved where they live, work and invest through our volunteer and wealth sharing programs. In 2022, more than 270 Carlyle employees gave over 400 philanthropic gifts, which we matched. These gifts supported over 170 nonprofit organizations globally. Carlyle employees also put their time and expertise to work through volunteer activities across our offices.
Employee Wellness
We believe that a key component to investing in our employees is investing in their wellness. We focus on five pillars of wellbeing for our employees: physical, environmental, emotional, social and financial. During June 2022, we continued our practice that started in September 2021, of hosting a “Wellbeing Month,” where we provide activities and seminars dedicated to each of the wellbeing pillars. Activities during our Wellbeing Month included seminars with external wellness providers and interactive physical activities. Beginning in September 2021, we provided our eligible employees with an annual $750 well-being stipend to use for personal wellness needs, which we continued in 2022. For the second year in a row, we also established a firmwide week-long holiday during August 2022 to provide a coordinated break for our employees.
COVID-19
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been engaged with our employees and adapted to changing circumstances while remaining committed to the health and safety of our employees. During the latter part of 2021, we implemented a hybrid return-to-office approach to reintegrate our employees, including new employees who joined Carlyle during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employees generally work in the office three days per week, depending on business needs, and work remotely for the balance of the week. Our technology infrastructure has facilitated our ability to shift to a hybrid work environment and our employees and leaders have demonstrated their ability to quickly and seamlessly adapt without disruption to our business.

21


Environmental, Social and Governance
We are committed to the principle that building a better business means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest. As a responsible global organization dedicated to driving value by seeking to serve its stakeholders, Carlyle has made it a priority to invest in a framework and the necessary resources for understanding, monitoring and managing ESG risks and opportunities across our portfolio. We believe ESG provides an additional lens to help us assess and mitigate risks, and identify and capitalize on potential legislative, judicial or administrativeopportunities. To implement these principles into our investment process, in 2008, we developed a set of Guidelines for Responsible Investment that consider the environmental, social and governance implications of certain investments we make, which help guide our investment practices. In December 2020, we expanded upon these guidelines through the publication of our comprehensive Environmental, Social and Governance Policy, which outlines our approach to ESG integration, and our resourcing, scope and investment application, and which has now replaced our Guidelines for Responsible Investment.
We continuously have sought to strengthen our governance, resourcing, reporting and transparency on ESG matters. In 2010, we became one of the first major private equity firms to publish an ESG report and in 2014, we hired our first dedicated ESG professional. Since then, we have continued to expand our team of dedicated ESG professionals. In 2020, we further strengthened our policies and practices around evaluating new investments for ESG implications, establishing a senior ESG review committee to evaluate more complex ESG issues, in order to help guide our investment analysis. Also in 2020, we published our inaugural Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Report, underscoring our evolving approach to climate change and differing interpretations, possiblywe published our first corporate ESG disclosures, utilizing Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, which provide an internationally recognized framework to communicate ESG matters to our various stakeholders. In 2022, we became a signatory of the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, and remain involved with several important industry initiatives in the field, including, among others, the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, the International Sustainability Standards Board Investor Advisory Group (IIAG), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) Global Responsible Investment Steering Committee, and the One Planet Private Equity Funds Initiative.

Our Board of Directors oversees our firm’s approach to ESG given the critical importance with which we view ESG principles. The Board receives regular updates on our ESG strategy and certain investment implications, and receives information on thematic topics, such as our approach to climate risk and opportunity and DEI. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, which takes a retroactive basis”leadership role in shaping our corporate governance, including our ESG and Impact strategy, has appointed a member of the Board to serve as the ESG and Impact lead, responsible for oversight of the firm’s work in this area. In addition, Carlyle’s Global Head of Impact is directly responsible for our climate strategy, and reports to the firm’s Chief Operating Officer.

With respect to our investments, we may track certain ESG key performance indicators (KPIs) that we consider relevant across diverse geographies and assets for our corporate private equity and natural resources investments, including climate-related metrics. For some of our larger strategies, we generally work with qualifying portfolio companies on collecting more tailored ESG KPIs and climate-related data such as carbon footprints.
Carlyle has an internal dedicated ESG team with a breadth of experience to help identify critical ESG matters in our investment processes, as well as a network of outside experts to enable our investment teams to selectively go deeper on important ESG factors and potential ESG growth opportunities for a given investment over our projected investment periods. We believe our commitment to ESG may strengthen strategy, bring new ideas for operational efficiency and help unlock value for certain portfolio companies.
Since Carlyle was established, we have recognized the value and benefits of maintaining a business model grounded in investment fundamentals, strong governance and transparency. We are committed to maintaining strong internal corporate governance processes and fiduciary functions and are subject to regulatory supervision. Carlyle professionals receive regular and targeted training on many issues related to corporate governance and compliance, such as anti-corruption, conflicts of interest, economic sanctions and anti-money laundering. Our policy requires all employees to annually certify their understanding of and compliance with key global Carlyle policies and procedures.
Global Information Technology and Solutions
    Global Information Technology and Solutions, which we refer to as GTS, is essential for Carlyle to conduct investment activities, manage internal administration activities and connect our global enterprise. As part of our GTS strategy and governance processes, we develop and routinely refine our technology architecture to leverage solutions that will best serve the needs of our investors. Our systems, data, network and infrastructure are continuously monitored and administered by formal controls and risk management processes that help protect the data and privacy of our employees and investors. Our business continuity plans are designed to allow all critical business functions to continue in an orderly manner in the event of an emergency. Our GTS team works closely with our business segment teams to maintain operational resilience through business continuity planning and annual IT disaster recovery testing, which collectively support the goal of mitigating risk were an emergency to occur.
31
22







Our Information Security Steering Committee, chaired by our Chief Information Security Officer, monitors threats and prioritizes the initiatives of our information security program. We also seek to educate our employees on how to safeguard Carlyle’s information assets through quarterly security awareness training focused on cyber risks and simulated phishing exercises that provide insight into the effectiveness of our security training.
Competition
    As a global investment firm, we compete with a broad array of regional and “—Risks Relatedglobal investment firms, as well as global banking institutions and other types of financial institutions and markets, for employees, investors and investment opportunities. Generally, our competition varies across business lines, geographies, distribution channels and financial markets. We believe that our competition for investors is based primarily on investment performance, business relationships, the quality of services provided to our Company—In past years,investors, reputation and brand recognition, pricing, market sentiment and the U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would have:relative attractiveness of the particular opportunity in some cases afterwhich a ten-year transition period, precluded us from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or required usparticular fund intends to hold carried interest through taxable subsidiary corporations. If any similar legislation wereinvest. To stay competitive, we believe it is also important to be enactedable to offer fund investors a customized suite of investment products that enable them to tailor their investments across the product offerings in our three global business segments. As we continue to target high net worth investors, we also face competition for these investors from mutual funds and applyinvestment firms that have competing retail products. We believe that competition for investment opportunities varies across business lines, but is generally based on industry expertise and potential for value-add, pricing, terms and the structure of a proposed investment and certainty of execution.
    We generally compete with sponsors of public and private investment funds across all of our segments. In addition to these traditional competitors, we increasingly have faced competition from local and regional firms, insurance and reinsurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, family offices and agencies and instrumentalities of governments in the various countries in which we invest. This trend has been especially apparent in emerging markets, where local firms tend to have more established relationships with the companies in which we are attempting to invest. Large institutional investors and sovereign wealth funds increasingly have begun to develop their own in-house investment capabilities and may compete against us for investment opportunities and greater reliance on advisory firms or in-house investment management may reduce fund of funds’ appeal to large institutional investors.
Within our GPE segment, our main competitors for investment opportunities are generally other private equity sponsors, sovereign wealth funds and operating companies acting as strategic acquirers, as well as real estate development companies and other infrastructure investment business. In our Global Credit segment, our main competitors are private credit strategies, business development companies, distressed debt funds, mezzanine funds, lessors of commercial aircraft, infrastructure lenders and other CLO issuers. In our Global Investment Solutions segment, our main competitors are other fund of funds managers and/or with advisers that are turning their business models towards discretionary investment advisory services. As larger sovereign wealth funds and pension funds pursue direct commitments and secondary transactions, our Global Investment Solutions funds may face increased competition for investments and coinvestment opportunities.

    Some of the entities that we compete with are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do. Many of our competitors also have recently raised, or are expected to raise, significant amounts of capital and many of them have investment objectives similar to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities and investor capital. Some of these competitors may also have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, the after tax incomewhich may create competitive disadvantages for us when sourcing investment opportunities. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds, which could allow them to consider a wider range of investments and gain related to our business couldbid more aggressively than us for investments. Strategic buyers may also be reduced.” Recently enacted U.S. tax reform legislation, informally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") includes a provision that changes the treatment of carried interestable to achieve synergistic cost savings or revenue enhancements with respect to an applicable partnership interest from long-term capital gains to short-term capital gains (taxable at ordinary income rates) to the extent such gains relate to property with a holding period not greater than three years, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Outside the U.S., in April 2016, the United Kingdom adopted legislation that changed the scope of and tax rate for carried interest,targeted portfolio company, which impacted certain of our investment funds and certain of our London-based investment professionals. There could certainly be other countries that clarify or modify their treatment of carried interest. These types of developments might make it more difficult for us to incentivize, recruit and retain investment professionals, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objectives. In addition, the after-tax income and gain related to our business, our distributions to common unitholders and the market price of our common units, all could be reduced.
We have granted and expect to grant equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan, which has caused dilution. While we evaluate the grant of equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan to employees on an annual basis, the size of the grants, if any, is made at our discretion. If we increase the use of equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan in the future, expenses associated with equity-based compensation may increase materially. In 2017, we incurred equity compensation expenses of $183 million in connection with grants of deferred restricted common units. We did not issue any deferred restricted phantom units in 2017. The value of our common units may drop in value or be volatile, which may make our equity less attractive to our employees since we may not be able to adequately incentivize them.achieve through our own portfolio, and this may provide them with a competitive advantage in bidding for such investments.
As of December 31, 2017, our employees held an aggregate of 15,470,416 unvested deferred restricted common units, which vest over various time periods, generally from one
Regulatory and a half to six years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2017, our employees did not hold any unvested deferred restricted phantom units. In order to recruit and retain existing and future senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel, we may need to increase the level of compensation that we pay to them. Accordingly,Compliance Matters
United States
    Our businesses, as we promote or hire new senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel over time or attempt to retain the services of certain of our key personnel, we may increase the level of compensation we pay to these individuals, which could cause our total employee compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of our total revenue to increase and adversely affect our profitability. The issuance of equity interests in our business in the future to our senior Carlyle professionals and other personnel would also dilute our unitholders.
At the time of our initial public offering and in several subsequent acquisitions, we issued Carlyle Holdings partnership units that are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for common units. The exchange and sale of these units will increase the number of our common units that are traded in the public market. All of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by our founders are fully vested. Of the outstanding Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by our other senior Carlyle professionals, 89% are vested and 11% are unvested as of December 31, 2017. The remaining unvested Carlyle Holdings units generally will vest in one installment on May 2, 2018.  Subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, including the minimum retained ownership requirements and other restrictions, Carlyle Holdings unitholders were able to exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units in the Partnership on a one-to-one basis each quarter starting in the second quarter of 2017.  See “Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Exchange Agreement.”
We strive to maintain our One Carlyle culture of collaboration and seek to continue to align our interests (and the interests of our employees) with those of our fund investors. If we do not continue to develop and implement the right processes and tools to maintain our culture, our ability to compete successfully and achieve our business objectives could be impaired, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Given the priority we afford the interests of our fund investors and our focus on achieving superior investment performance, we may reduce our AUM, restrain its growth, reduce our fees or otherwise alter the terms under which we do business when we deem it in the best interest of our fund investors—even in circumstances where such actions might be contrary to the near-term interests of unitholders.
In pursuing the interests of our fund investors, we may take actions that could reduce the profits we could otherwise realize in the short term. While we believe that our commitment to our fund investors and our discipline in this regard is in the long-term interest of us and our unitholders, our unitholders should understand this approach may have an adverse impact on our short-term profitability, and there is no guarantee that it will be beneficial in the long term. The means by which we seek to achieve superior investment performance in each of our strategies could include limiting the AUM in our strategies to an

32






amount that we believe can be invested appropriately in accordance with our investment philosophy and current or anticipated economic and market conditions. Additionally, we may voluntarily reduce management fee rates and terms for certain of our funds or strategies when we deem it appropriate, even when doing so may reduce our short-term revenue. For instance, in order to enhance our relationship with certain fund investors, we have reduced management fees or ceased charging management fees on certain funds in specific instances. In certain investment funds, we have agreed to charge management fees based on invested capital or net asset value as opposed to charging management fees based on committed capital. In certain cases, such as our most recent power fund, we have provided “fee holidays” to certain investors during which we do not charge management fees for a fixed period of time (suchwell as the first six months). We may receive requests to reduce management fees on other funds in the future. “—See Risks Related to Our Business—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
Certain of our investment funds may utilize subscription lines of credit to fund investments prior to the receipt of capital contributions from the fund's investors. As capital calls made to a fund's investors are delayed when using a subscription line of credit, the investment period of such investor capital is shortened, which may increase the net internal rate of return of an investment fund. However, since interest expense and other costs of borrowings under subscription lines of credit are an expense of the investment fund, the investment fund's net multiple of invested capital will be reduced, as will the amount of carried interest generated by the fund. Any material reduction in the amount of carried interest generated by a fund will adversely affect our revenues.
In prioritizing the interests of our fund investors, we may also take other actions that could adversely impact our short-term results of operations when we deem such action appropriate. We have also waived management fees on certain leveraged finance vehicles at various times to improve returns. Furthermore, we typically delay the realization of carried interest to which we are otherwise entitled if we determine (based on a variety of factors, including the stage of the fund’s life cycle and the extent of fund profits accrued to date) that there would be an unacceptably high risk of potential future giveback obligations. Any such delay could result in a deferral of realized carried interest to a subsequent period. See “ Risks Related to Our Company Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable, which makes it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis.”
We may not be successful in expanding into new investment strategies, markets and businesses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our growth strategy focuses on providing resources to foster the development of new product offerings and business strategies by our investment professionals. Given our diverse platform, these initiatives could create conflicts of interests with existing products, increase our costs and expose us to new market risks and legal and regulatory requirements. These products may have different economic structures than our traditional investment funds and may require a different marketing approach. These activities also may impose additional compliance burdens on us, subject us to enhanced regulatory scrutiny and expose us to greater reputation and litigation risk.

The success of our growth strategy will depend on, among other things:

our ability to correctly identify and create products that appeal to our investors;
the diversion of management’s time and attention from our existing businesses;

management's ability to spend time developing and integrating the new business and the success of the integration effort;

our ability to properly manage conflicts of interests;

our ability to identify and manage risks in new lines of businesses;

our ability to obtain requisite approvals and licenses from the relevant governmental authorities and to comply with applicable laws and regulations without incurring undue costs and delays; and

our ability to successfully negotiate and enter into beneficial arrangements with our counterparties.

In some instances, we may determine that growth in a specific area is best achieved through the acquisition of an existing business or a smaller scale lift out of an investment team to enhance our platform. Our ability to consummate an acquisition will depend on our ability to identify and value potential acquisition opportunities accurately and successfully compete for these businesses against companies that may have greater financial resources. Even if we are able to identify and

33






successfully negotiate and complete an acquisition, these transactions can be complex and we may encounter unexpected difficulties or incur unexpected costs.
In addition to the concerns noted above, the success of a firm acquisition will be affected by, on among other things:
difficulties and costs associated with the integration of operations and systems;

difficulties integrating the acquired business’s internal controls and procedures into our existing control structure;

difficulties and costs associated with the assimilation of employees; and

the risk that a change in ownership will negatively impact the relationship between an acquiree and the investors in its investment vehicles.

Each acquisition transaction presents unique challenges and if a new product, business or venture developed internally or by acquisition is unsuccessful, we may decide to wind down, liquidate and/or discontinue it. Such actions could negatively impact our relationships with fund investors in those businesses, could subject us to litigation or regulatory inquiries and can expose us to additional expenses, including impairment charges and potential liability from investor or other complaints.
Our organizational documents do not limit our ability to enter into new lines of business, and we intend to, from time to time, expand into new investment strategies, geographic markets and businesses, each of which may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our businesses.
We intend, to the extent that market conditions warrant, to seek to grow our businesses and expand into new investment strategies, geographic markets and businesses. Our organizational documents do not limit us to the asset management business and to the extent that we make strategic investments or acquisitions in new geographic markets or businesses, undertake other related strategic initiatives or enter into a new line of business, we may face numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with the following:
the required investment of capital and other resources;

the possibility that we have insufficient expertise to engage in such activities profitably or without incurring inappropriate amounts of risk;

the diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses;

assumption of liabilities in any acquired business;

the disruption of our ongoing business;

the increasing demands on or issues related to the combination or integration of operational and management systems and controls;

compliance with or applicability to our business or our portfolio companies of regulations and laws, including, in particular, local regulations and laws (for example, consumer protection related laws) and customs in the numerous global jurisdictions in which we operate and the impact that noncompliance or even perceived noncompliance could have on us and our portfolio companies;

a potential increase in investor concentration; and

the broadening of our geographic footprint, including the risks associated with conducting operations in certain foreign jurisdictions where we currently have no presence.
Entry into certain lines of business may subject us to new laws and regulations with which we are not familiar or from which we are currently exempt, and may lead to increased liability and litigation and regulatory risk and expense. If a new business generates insufficient revenue or if we are unable to efficiently manage our expanded operations, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

34






Our strategic initiatives may include joint ventures, which may subject us to additional risks and uncertainties in that we may be dependent upon, and subject to liability, losses or reputational damage relating to, systems, controls and personnel that are not under our control. We currently participate in joint advisory arrangements and may elect to participate in additional joint venture opportunities in the future if we believe that operating in such a structure is in our best interests. There can be no assurances that our current joint advisory arrangements will continue in their current form, or at all, in the future or that we will be able to identify acceptable joint venture partners in the future or that our participation in any additional joint venture opportunities will be successful.
In past years, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would have: in some cases after a ten-year transition period, precluded us from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or required us to hold carried interest through taxable subsidiary corporations. If any similar legislation were to be enacted and apply to us, the after tax income and gain related to our business could be reduced.

Legislative proposals by members of the U.S. Congress have provided that, for taxable years beginning ten years after the date of enactment, income derived with respect to carried interest would not meet the qualifying income requirements under the publicly traded partnership rules. Therefore, if similar legislation is enacted, following such ten-year period, we would be precluded from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or be required to hold all such carried interest through corporations, possibly U.S. corporations. If we were taxed as a U.S. corporation or required to hold all carried interest through corporations, our effective tax rate increase significantly. The federal statutory rate for corporations is currently 21%. In addition, we could be subject to increased state and local taxes. Furthermore, common unitholders could be subject to tax on our conversion into a corporation or any restructuring required in order for us to hold our carried interest through a corporation.
States and local jurisdictions have considered and are considering changes to the income tax treatment of carried interest and partnershipsservices industry generally, that could, if enacted, cause us to incur a material increase in our tax liability and/or cause carried interest or other income allocable to holders of our common units to be subject to state or local income tax at higher rates than under current law.

States and other jurisdictions have also considered legislation to increase taxes with respect to carried interest. For example, New York has considered legislation under which common unitholders, even if they are not residents of New York, could be subject to New York state income tax on income in respect of our common units as a result of certain activities of our affiliates in New York, although it is unclear when or whether similar legislation may be enacted. In addition, states and other jurisdictions have considered legislation to increase taxes involving other aspects of our structure and have considered and enacted legislation which could increase taxes imposed on our income and gain. For example, the District of Columbia has passed legislation that could expand the portion of our income that could be subject to District of Columbia income or franchise tax. These and other proposals have recently been under heightened consideration in light of the recently enacted TCJA.
Proposed changes in U.S. and foreign taxation of businesses could adversely affect us.

Congress, the OECD, the European Commission and other government agencies in jurisdictions where we and our affiliates invest or do business have maintained a focus on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. The OECD, which represents a coalition of member countries, has proposed changes to numerous long-standing tax principles through its base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project, an area that focuses in part on payments made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a jurisdiction with lower tax rates.

The OECD released the BEPS package in October 2015, which looks at various different ways in which domestic tax rules around the world, and the bilateral double tax treaties that govern the interplay between them, could be amended to address profit shifting among affiliated entities. Several of the proposed measures, including measures covering treaty abuse, the deductibility of interest expense, local nexus requirements, transfer pricing and hybrid mismatch arrangements are potentially relevant to some of our structures and could have an adverse tax impact on our funds, investors and/or our portfolio companies. Some member countries have been moving forward on the BEPS agenda but, because timing of implementation and the specific measures adopted will vary among participating states, significant uncertainty remains regarding the impact of BEPS proposals. If implemented, these proposals could result in a loss of tax treaty benefits and increased taxes on income from our investments.

A number of European jurisdictions have enacted taxes on financial transactions, and the European Commission has proposed legislation to harmonize these taxes under the so-called "enhanced cooperation procedure," which provides for adoption of EU-level legislation applicable to some but not all EU Member States. We are continuing to evaluate the impacts of of these contemplated changes which, if adopted by individual countries, could potentially increase tax uncertainty and/or costs

35






faced by us, our funds’ portfolio companies and our investors, change our business model and cause other adverse consequences.

As part of the TCJA, any gain recognized by a non-U.S. holder on the sale or exchange of a partnership interests that is deemed to be effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business will also be treated as ECI. The TCJA includes a provision effective after December 31, 2017 requiring the transferee of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business to withhold 10 percent of the transferor’s realized (gross purchase price) on the sale, exchange or other disposition of such partnership interest, unless an applicable non-foreign person affadavit is furnished by the transferor or another exception applies. Until additional guidance is issued by the applicable authorities, due to lack of clarity this could have an adverse impact on our secondaries business.
Operational risks, including those associated with our business model, may disrupt our businesses, result in losses or limit our growth.
We rely heavily on our financial, accounting, information and other data processing systems. We face various security threats on a regular basis, including ongoing cyber security threats to and attacks on our information technology infrastructure that are intended to gain access to our proprietary information, destroy data or disable, degrade or sabotage our systems. These security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including unknown third parties outside the company.
There has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the cyber and security threats we face, with attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to those that are more advanced and persistent, which may target us because, as an alternative asset management firm, we hold a significant amount of confidential and sensitive information about our investors, our portfolio companies and potential investments. As a result, we may face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption with respect to this information resulting from an attack by computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists. If successful, these types of attacks on our network or other systems could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, due to, among other things, the loss of investor or proprietary data, interruptions or delays in our business and damage to our reputation. Although we are not currently aware that we have been subject to cyber-attacks or other cyber- incidents which, individually or in the aggregate, have materially affected our operations or financial condition, there can be no assurance that the various procedures and controls we utilize to mitigate these threats will be sufficient to prevent disruptions to our systems, especially because the cyber-attack techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until launched, and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. If any of these systems do not operate properly or are disabled for any reason or if there is any unauthorized disclosure of data, whether as a result of tampering, a breach of our network security systems, a cyber-incident or attack or otherwise, we could suffer substantial financial loss, increased costs, a disruption of our businesses, liability to our funds and fund investors, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means. Cyber security also has become a top priority for regulators around the world. For example, in 2017, one of the examination priorities identified by the SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations’ (OCIE) was to continue to examine for cyber security compliance procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of those procedures and controls.
Our information systems and technology may not continue to be able to accommodate our growth, and the cost of maintaining such systems may increase from its current level. For example, our existing systems may not be adequate to identify or control the relevant risks in investment strategies employed by new investment funds we may introduce. A failure to accommodate growth, or an increase in costs related to such information systems, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our business, including for certain information systems and technology and administration of our business development companies and structured credit funds. Any interruption or deterioration in the performance of these third parties or failures of their information systems and technology could impair the quality of the funds’ operations and could affect our reputation and hence adversely affect our businesses.
We depend on our headquarters in Washington, DC, where most of our administrative and operations personnel are located, and our office in Arlington, Virginia, which houses our treasury, tax and finance functions, for the continued operation of our business. However, our global employee base services the needs of our investment funds and investors out of 31 offices around the world. As our business needs evolve and/or in order to reduce expenses, we may close offices, terminate the employment of a significant number of our personnel or cut back or eliminate the use of certain services or service providers, that, in each case, could be important to our business and without which our operating results could be adversely affected. Furthermore, a restructuring of our corporate real estate that results in the closure of one or more offices could result in significant charges and other costs incurred by us.
A disaster or a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses, including a disruption involving electronic communications or other services used by us or third parties with whom we conduct business, or directly affecting our headquarters, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue to operate our business without interruption. Our

36






disaster recovery programs may not be sufficient to mitigate the harm that may result from such a disaster or disruption. We may also need to commit additional management, operational and financial resources to identify new professionals to join our firm and to maintain appropriate operational and financial systems to adequately support expansion. The market for hiring talented professionals, including IT professionals, is competitive and we may not be able to grow at the pace we desire.

In addition, we may not be able to obtain or maintain sufficient insurance on commercially reasonable terms or with adequate coverage levels against potential liabilities we may face in connection with potential claims, which could have a material adverse affect on our business. We may face a risk of loss from a variety of claims, including related to securities, antitrust, contracts, fraud and various other potential claims, whether or not such claims are valid. Insurance and other safeguards might only partially reimburse us for our losses, if at all, and if a claim is successful and exceeds or is not covered by our insurance policies, we may be required to pay a substantial amount in respect of such successful claim. Certain losses of a catastrophic nature, such as wars, earthquakes, typhoons, terrorist attacks or other similar events, may be uninsurable or may only be insurable at rates that are so high that maintaining coverage would cause an adverse impact on our business, our investment funds and their portfolio companies. In general, losses related to terrorism are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against. Some insurers are excluding terrorism coverage from their all-risk policies. In some cases, insurers are offering significantly limited coverage against terrorist acts for additional premiums, which can greatly increase the total cost of casualty insurance for a property. As a result, we, our investment funds and their portfolio companies may not be insured against terrorism or certain other catastrophic losses.

Our portfolio companies also rely on data and processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information. A disruption or compromise of these systems could have a material adverse effect on the value of these businesses. Our funds may invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or security breach than other assets or businesses. Such an event may have adverse consequences on our investment or assets of the same type or may require portfolio companies to increase preventative security measures or expand insurance coverage.
Failure to maintain the security of our information and technology networks, including personally identifiable and investor information, intellectual property and proprietary business information could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are subject to various risks and costs associated with the collection, handling, storage and transmission of sensitive information, including those related to compliance with U.S. and foreign data collection and privacy laws and other contractual obligations, as well as those associated with the compromise of our systems collecting such information. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, and personally identifiable information of our employees and our investors, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information are critical to our operations. Although we take various measures and have made, and will continue to make, significant investments to ensure the integrity of our systems and to safeguard against such failures or security breaches, there can be no assurance that these measures and investments will provide protection. In addition, we and our employees may be the target of fraudulent emails or other targeted attempts to gain unauthorized access to proprietary or sensitive information. A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of investor, employee or other personally identifiable or proprietary business data, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us by the U.S. federal and state governments, the European Union (the “EU”) or other jurisdictions or by various regulatory organizations or exchanges. Such an event could additionally disrupt our operations and the services we provide to investors, damage our reputation, result in a loss of a competitive advantage, impact our ability to provide timely and accurate financial data, and cause a loss of confidence in our services and financial reporting, which could adversely affect our business, revenues, competitive position and investor confidence.
Extensiveextensive regulation in the United States and abroad affectselsewhere. In general, the SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and other regulators around the globe have in recent years significantly increased their regulatory activities with respect to global investment firms.
    Certain of our subsidiaries are registered as investment advisers with the SEC. Registered investment advisers are subject to the requirements and regulations of the Advisers Act. Such requirements relate to, among other things, fiduciary duties to advisory clients, maintaining an effective compliance program, solicitation agreements, conflicts of interest, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on agency cross and principal transactions between an adviser and advisory clients and general anti-fraud prohibitions. In addition, our registered investment advisers are subject to routine periodic and other examinations by the SEC staff. In accordance with our efforts to enhance our compliance program and in response to recommendations received from the SEC in the course of routine examinations, certain additional
23


policies and procedures have been put into place, but no material changes to our registered investment advisers’ operations have been made as a result of such examinations. Our registered investment advisers also have not been subject to any regulatory or disciplinary actions by the SEC. Finally, certain of our investment advisers are subject to limited SEC disclosure requirements as “exempt reporting advisers.”
Effective January 3, 2022, Carlyle’s two affiliated broker-dealer entities, TCG Securities, L.L.C. (“TCG Securities”) and TCG Capital Markets L.L.C. (“TCG Capital Markets”), restructured and now operate as TCG Capital Markets. TCG Capital Markets is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and in 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). In addition, TCG Capital Markets operates under an international dealer exemption in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan. TCG Capital Markets may act as an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent in securities offerings and TCG Senior Funding L.L.C. may act as an underwriter, originator, syndicator or placement agent for loan originations. TCG Capital Markets also conducts U.S.-based marketing and fundraising activities increasesfor our Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Global Investment Solutions business lines, and houses our anti-money laundering compliance function. TCG Capital Markets acts as a placement agent, on a best-efforts basis, for interests in private funds and other investment vehicles for such business lines.
    Registered broker-dealers are subject to routine periodic and other examinations by the coststaff of doing businessFINRA. No material changes to our broker-dealer operations have been made as a result of such examinations.
    Broker-dealers are subject to rules relating to transactions on a particular exchange and/or market, and createsrules relating to the potential for significant liabilitiesinternal operations of the firms and penalties.
Our businesstheir dealings with customers including, but not limited to, the form or organization of the firm, qualifications of associated persons, officers and directors, net capital and customer protection rules, books and records and financial statements and reporting. In particular, as a result of its registered status, TCG Capital Markets is subject to extensive regulation,the SEC’s uniform net capital rule, Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which specifies both the minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must maintain relative to the scope of its business activities and net capital liquidity parameters. The SEC and FINRA require compliance with key financial responsibility rules, including periodic examinations, by governmental agenciesmaintenance of adequate funds to meet expenses and self-regulatory organizations incontractual obligations, as well as early warning rules that compel notice to the jurisdictions inregulators via accelerated financial reporting anytime a firm’s capital falls below the minimum required level. The uniform net capital rule limits the amount of qualifying subordinated debt that is treated as equity to a specific percentage under the debt-to-equity ratio test, and further limits the withdrawal of equity capital, which we operate aroundis subject to specific notice provisions. Finally, compliance with net capital rules may also limit a firm’s ability to expand its operations, particularly to those activities that require the world. Manyuse of these regulators, including U.S. and foreign government agencies and self-regulatory organizations and state securities commissions incapital. Violation of the United States, are empowered to conduct investigations and administrative proceedings that cannet capital rule may result in censures, fines, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including censure, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, revocation of licenses or registrations, the suspension or expulsion from the securities industry of athe broker-dealer or its officers or employees or other similar consequences by regulatory bodies. To date, TCG Capital Markets has not had any capital adequacy issues and is currently capitalized in excess of the minimum maintenance amount required by regulators.
    Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (“CGCIM”) and CSL III Advisor, LLC, subsidiaries of Carlyle, serve as investment adviser from registration or memberships. Even if an investigation or proceeding does not result in a sanction or the sanction imposed against us or our personnel by a regulator were small in monetary amount, the costs incurred in respondingadvisers to

37






such matters could be material and the adverse publicity relating to the investigation, proceeding or imposition of these sanctions could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing fund investors or fail to gain new investors or discourage others from doing business with us. Some of our certain closed-end investment funds invest in businesses that operate in highly regulated industries, including in businesses that are regulated by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and U.S. federal and state banking authorities. The regulatory regimes to which such businesses are subject may, among other things, condition our funds’ ability to invest in those businesses upon the satisfaction of applicable ownership restrictions or qualification requirements. Our failure to obtain or maintain any regulatory approvals necessary for our funds to invest in such industries may disqualify our funds from participating in certain investments or require our funds to divest themselves of certain assets.

In recent years, the SEC and its staff have focused on issues relevant to alternative asset management firms and have formed specialized units devoted to examining such firms and, in certain cases, bringing enforcement actions against the firms, their principals and their employees. It is unclear whether the SEC and its staff will maintain the same level of enforcement activity under the current administration. Significant enforcement activity related to alternative asset management firms may cause us to reevaluate certain practices and adjust our compliance control function as necessary and appropriate. 

It is generally expected that the SEC’s oversight of alternative asset managers will continue to focus on concerns related to transparency and investor disclosure practices.   Although the SEC has cited improvements in disclosures and industry practices in this area, it has also indicated that there is room for improvement in particular areas, including fees and expenses (and the allocation of such fees and expenses) and co-investment practices.  To this end, many firms have received inquiries during examinations or directly from the SEC Division of Enforcement regarding various transparency-related topics, including the acceleration of monitoring fees, the allocation of broken-deal expenses, the disclosure of operating partner or operating executive compensation, outside business activities of firm principals and employees, group purchasing arrangements and general conflicts of interest disclosures. 

The SEC’s focus in these areas could impact Carlyle in various ways.  For example, in November 2015, the SEC requested additional information about our historical monitoring fee acceleration practices, a topic of a recent enforcement action within the private equity industry.  We continue to cooperate with the SEC’s informal request.  In addition, our private equity funds frequently engage operating executives who often work (generally, on a part-time basis) with our investment teams during due diligence, provide board-level governance and support and advise portfolio company management. Operating executives generally are third parties, are not considered Carlyle employees and typically are retained by us pursuant to consulting agreements. Generally these consultants also are involved in non-Carlyle related activities, including serving on boards of companies that are not our portfolio companies. In some cases, an operating executive mayhave elected to be retained by a portfolio company directly and in such instances the portfolio company may compensate the operating executive directly (meaning that investors in our private equity funds may indirectly bear the cost of the operating executive’s compensation).  While we believe we have made appropriate and timely disclosures regarding the engagement and compensation of our operating executives, the SEC staff may disagree.

We regularly are subject to requests for information and informal or formal investigations by the SEC and other regulatory authorities, with which we routinely cooperate and, in the current environment, even historical practices that have been previously examined are being revisited. In 2014, the SEC indicated that investment advisers that receive transaction-based compensation for investment banking or acquisition activities relating to fund portfolio companies may be required to registerregulated as broker-dealers. Specifically, the Staff noted that if a firm receives fees from a fund portfolio company in connection with the acquisition, disposition or recapitalization of such portfolio company, such fees could raise broker-dealer concernsBDCs under applicable regulations related to broker dealers. In 2016, the SEC charged an SEC-registered investment advisor to a private equity fund and its principal with violating Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act for providing brokerage services and receiving transaction-based compensation in connection with the purchase and sale of portfolio companies while not being registered as a broker-dealer. To the extent we receive such transaction fees and the SEC takes the position that such activities render us a “broker” under the applicable rules and regulations of the Exchange Act, we could be subject to additional regulation. If receipt of transaction fees from a portfolio company is determined to require a broker-dealer license, receipt of such transaction fees in the past or in the future during any time when we did not or do not have a broker-dealer license could subject us to liability for fines, penalties or damages. Even if a regulatory investigation or proceeding does not result in a sanction or the sanction imposed against us or our personnel by a regulator were small in monetary amount, the adverse publicity relating to such matters could harm our reputation. In addition, our ability to accelerate such fees in the future could be affected.
We regularly rely on exemptions from various requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Exchange Act, the Investment Company Act the Commodity Exchange Act,(as well as to certain private funds and the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), in conducting our asset management activities in the United States.

38






Similarly, in conducting our asset management activities outside the United States, we rely on available exemptions from the regulatory regimes of various foreign jurisdictions. These exemptions from regulation within the United States and abroadother clients). Accordingly, these BDCs are sometimes highly complex and may, in certain circumstances, depend on compliance by third parties whom we do not control. If for any reason these exemptions were to become unavailable to us, we could become subject to regulatory action or third-party claims and our business could be materially and adversely affected. For example, in 2014, the SEC amended Rule 506 of Regulation Dall relevant provisions under the SecuritiesInvestment Company Act to impose “bad actor” disqualification provisions which ban an issuer from offering or selling securities pursuantas registered investment companies. In addition, CGCIM serves as the investment adviser to the safe harbor in Rule 506 if the issuer, or any other “covered person”,Interval Fund, which is the subject of a criminal, regulatory or court order or other “disqualifying event” under the rule which has not been waived by the SEC. The definition of “covered person” under the rule includes an issuer’s directors, general partners, managing members and executive officers; affiliates who are also issuing securities in the offering; beneficial owners of 20% or more of the issuer’s outstanding equity securities; and promoters and persons compensated for soliciting investors in the offering. Accordingly, our ability to rely on Rule 506 to offer or sell securities would be impaired if we or any “covered person” is the subject of a disqualifying event under the rule and we are unable to obtain a waiver from the SEC. Moreover, the requirements imposed by our regulators are designed primarily to ensure the integrity of the financial markets and to protect investors in our funds and are not designed to protect our unitholders. Consequently, these regulations often serve to limit our activities and impose burdensome compliance requirements. See—“Part I. Item 1. Business —Regulatory and Compliance Matters.”
We may become subject to additional regulatory and compliance burdens as we expand our product offerings and investment platform. For example, we have a number of closed-end investment companies in our Global Credit segment that are regulated as business development companiesa registered investment company under the Investment Company Act. These business development companies are subjectMoreover, AlpInvest Private Equity Investment Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Carlyle, serves as the investment adviser to inspection by the SEC and toCarlyle AlpInvest Private Markets Fund (“CAPM”), which is regulated as a registered investment company under the Investment Company ActAct. CGCIM also serves as a sub-adviser to CAPM.
United Kingdom and the rules thereunder, which, among other things impose regulatory restrictions on principal transactions between, and joint transactions among, business development company and certain of its affiliates, including its investment adviser. One such business development company completed an initial public offering in 2017, further subjecting that company to additional securities law requirements applicable to publicly traded issuers, as well as the listing standards of the applicable national securities exchange. These additional regulatory requirements will increase our compliance costs and may expose us to liabilities and penalties if we fail to comply with the applicable laws, rules and regulations.
In addition, the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “ITRA”) expanded the scope of U.S. sanctions against Iran and Section 219 of the ITRA amended the Exchange Act to require companies subject to SEC reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act to disclose in their periodic reports specified dealings or transactions involving Iran or other individuals and entities targeted by certain sanctions promulgated by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) engaged in by the reporting company or any of its affiliates, including in our case some of our portfolio companies, during the period covered by the relevant periodic report. In some cases, the ITRA requires companies to disclose transactions even if they were permissible under U.S. law. Although the ITRA also expanded the scope of U.S. sanctions by requiring foreign entities majority owned or controlled by a U.S. person to abide by U.S. sanctions against Iran to the same extent as a U.S. person, this restriction and certain sanctions were eased on January 16, 2016, when OFAC issued General License H and the U.S. Government relaxed or revoked other sanctions pursuant to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (the “JCPOA”), a multilateral agreement regarding Iran’s nuclear program. The JCPOA did not alter, however, our ITRA obligation to separately file with the SEC a notice that specified activities have been disclosed in our quarterly and annual reports, and the SEC is required to post this notice of disclosure on its website and send the report to the U.S. President and certain U.S. Congressional committees. Disclosure of ITRA-specified activity, even if such activity is legally permissible and not subject to sanctions under applicable law, and any fines or penalties actually imposed on us or our affiliates as a result of impermissible any Iran-related activities, could harm our reputation and have a negative impact on our business. In the past, we have disclosed pursuant to Section 13 of the Exchange Act, certain permissible dealings and transactions and to date, we have not received notice of any investigation into such activities.
It is unclear what impact the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union will have on the Partnership or the fund portfolio companies.
The United Kingdom (the “UK”) held a referendum in June 2016 on whether to remain a member state of the EU, in which a majority of voters voted to leave the EU. Pursuant to the referendum, the UK government invoked Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty relating to withdrawal (“Article 50”) on March 29, 2017. Under Article 50, the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union cease to apply in the relevant state from the date of entry into force of a withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification of intention to withdraw, although this period may be extended in certain circumstances. It is at present unclear what type of relationship between the UK and the EU will be established, or at what date (whether by the time when, or after, the UK ceases to be a member of the EU), or what would be the content of such a relationship. It is possible that a new relationship would preserve the applicability of certain EU rules (or

39






equivalent rules) in the UK, and the UK government has indicated that it intends to bring existing EU law into UK law on the date of the UK’s exit from the EU in general, subject to certain powers to deal with deficiencies in such retained EU law.
Currently under the EU single market directives, mutual access rights to markets and market infrastructure exist across the EU and the mutual recognition of insolvency, bank recovery and resolution regimes applies. In addition, certain regulated entities licensed or authorized in one European Economic Area ("EEA") jurisdiction may operate on a cross-border basis in other EEA countries in reliance on passporting rights and without the need for a separate license or authorization. There is uncertainty as to whether, following a UK exit from the EU or the EEA (whatever the form thereof), a passporting regime (or similar regime in its effect) will apply (if at all). Depending on the terms of the UK’s exit and the terms of any replacement relationship, it is likely that UK regulated entities may, on the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, lose the right to passport their services to EEA countries, and EEA entities may lose the right to reciprocal passporting into the UK. Also, UK entities may no longer have access rights to market infrastructure across the EU and the recognition of insolvency, bank recovery and resolution regimes across the EU may no longer be mutual.

At this time, it is difficult to predict precisely how the UK’s withdrawal from the EU will be implemented and what the economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory and other implications will be for the private investment funds industry and the broader European and global financial and real estate markets generally and for the Partnership, its investment funds and fund portfolio companies, specifically. Given the size and importance of the UK’s economy, uncertainty or unpredictability about its legal, political and/or economic relationships with Europe is now, and may continue to be for the foreseeable future (including beyond the date of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU), a source of instability, significant currency fluctuations and/or other adverse effects on international markets, international trade agreements and/or other existing cross-border cooperation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory or otherwise). In addition, the withdrawal of the UK from the EU could have a destabilizing effect in which other member states may also consider withdrawing from the EU. The decision for any other member state to withdraw from the EU could exacerbate such uncertainty and instability and may present similar and/or additional potential risks and consequences for the Partnership, its investment funds and fund portfolio companies.
Regulatory changes in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business.
As a result of the global financial crisis and highly publicized financial scandals, there has been an active debate over the appropriate extent of regulation and oversight of the financial industry, including private investment funds and their managers. The regulatory and legal requirements that currently apply to our business are subject to change from time to time and may become more restrictive, which may impose additional expenses on us, make compliance with applicable requirements more difficult, require significant attention of our senior management team or otherwise restrict our ability to conduct our business activities in the manner in which they are now conducted.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), enacted in 2010, has imposed significant changes on almost every aspect of the U.S. financial services industry, including aspects of our business. The current administration has indicated a desire to repeal, revise or replace aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act, but the timing and details on specific proposals are uncertain. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act currently includes the following provisions, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business:
    
The Dodd-Frank Act imposes a number of restrictions on the relationship and activities of banking organizations with private equity funds and hedge funds and other provisions that will affect the private equity industry, either directly or indirectly. Among other things, the Volcker Rule generally prohibits any “banking entity” (broadly defined as any insured depository institution, any company that controls such an institution, a non-U.S. bank that is treated as a bank holding company for purposes of U.S. banking law and any affiliate or subsidiary of the foregoing entities) from sponsoring or acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in a fund that is not subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act in reliance upon either Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. The Volcker Rule also requires certain nonbank financial companies that have been designated as systemically important by the Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") and subject to supervision by the Federal Reserve to comply with additional capital requirements and comply with certain other quantitative limits on such activities, although such entities are not expressly prohibited from engaging in proprietary trading or sponsoring or investing in such funds. Furthermore, divestitures by banking entities of impermissible ownership interests in covered funds to comply with the Volcker Rule may lead to lower prices in the secondary market for interests in our funds, which could have adverse implications for our ability to raise funds from investors who may have considered the availability of secondary market liquidity as a factor in determining whether to invest.


40






The Dodd-Frank Act also imposes a new regulatory structure on the “swaps” market, including requirements for clearing, exchange trading, capital, margin, reporting, and recordkeeping. In connection with the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC has finalized many rules applicable to swap market participants, including business conduct standards for swap dealers, reporting and recordkeeping, mandatory clearing for certain swaps, exchange trading rules applicable to swaps, initial and variation margin requirements for uncleared swap transactions and regulatory requirements for cross-border swap activities. For example, the CFTC finalized a rule governing margin requirements for uncleared swaps entered into by swap dealers and major swap participants who are not supervised by a “prudential regulator” (“covered swap entities”). The final rule generally requires covered swap entities, subject to certain thresholds and exemptions for inter-affiliate swaps, to collect and post margin in respect of uncleared swap transactions with other covered swap entities and financial end-users. In particular, the finalized rule requires covered swap entities and financial end-users having “material swaps exposure,” defined as such entity and certain affiliates have an average aggregate daily notional amount of uncleared swaps exceeding $8 billion for June, July and August of the previous calendar year, to collect and post a minimum amount of “initial margin” in respect of each uncleared swap. In addition, the finalized rule requires covered swap entities entering into uncleared swaps with other covered swap entities or financial-end users, regardless of swaps exposure, to post or collect (as appropriate) “variation margin”. These margin requirements for uncleared swaps could adversely affect our business, including our ability to enter such swaps or our available liquidity.

The Dodd-Frank Act amended the Exchange Act to direct the Federal Reserve and other federal regulatory agencies to adopt rules requiring sponsors of asset-backed securities (or a majority-owned affiliate thereof) to retain at least 5% of the credit risk relating to the assets collateralizing the asset-backed securities (the “U.S. Risk Retention Rules”). The U.S. Risk Retention Rules were issued by five federal banking and housing agencies (the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency) and the SEC in October 2014 and became effective on December 24, 2016 (the "U.S. Risk Retention Effective Date"). CLOs issued prior to the U.S. Risk Retention Effective Date are exempt from the requirements set forth in the U.S. Risk Retention Rules, except in connection with certain offers and sales of securities thereunder after the U.S. Risk Retention Effective Date (typically made in connection with any repricing, refinancing or reset of such CLO). With respect to the regulation of CLOs, the U.S. Risk Retention Rules require that either (i) the “sponsor” (which, in most cases, will be us) or a “majority-owned affiliate” thereof (in each case as defined in the U.S. Risk Retention Rules) retain such 5% portion described above as an “eligible vertical interest” or as an “eligible horizontal residual interest” (in each case as defined in the U.S. Risk Retention Rules) or any combination thereof in the CLO in the manner required by the U.S. Risk Retention Rules (provided that in certain circumstances, as described therein, a “sponsor” may offset the amount of “eligible interests” (as defined in the U.S. Risk Retention Rules) it is required to own by the eligible interests in the CLO acquired by an “originator” (as defined in the U.S. Risk Retention Rules) in such CLO) or (ii) the CLO is an “open market CLO” that buys and holds only certain “CLO-eligible loan tranches” (in each case as defined in the U.S. Risk Retention Rules) and for which the "lead arranger" - contrary to current market practice - retains at least 20% of the aggregate principal balance of the funded portion of the syndicated credit facility (that includes each "CLO-eligible loan tranche") at origination and thereafter retains (unhedged) at least 5% of the funded portion of the syndicated credit facility (that includes each "CLO-eligible loan tranche") through the life of the related CLO. The U.S. Risk Retention Rules contain provisions that may have adverse effects on us and/or the holders of the notes or other securities issued by our CLOs. The U.S. Risk Retention Rules permit the financing of a required retention interest to be financed only on a full recourse basis and, to the extent that we were to employ leverage for our required retention investments, the U.S. Risk Retention Rules generally prohibit the transfer or hedging of the related risk, which could cause losses to be earlier and larger than they would have been if leverage were not employed.

The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes federal regulatory agencies to review and, in certain cases, prohibit compensation arrangements at financial institutions that give employees incentives to engage in conduct deemed to encourage inappropriate risk taking by covered financial institutions. On May 16, 2016, the SEC re-proposed a rule, as part of a joint rulemaking effort with U.S. federal banking regulators, that would apply to "covered financial institutions," including registered investment advisers and broker-dealers that have total consolidated assets of at least $1 billion, and impose substantive and procedural requirements on incentive-based compensation arrangements. The application of this rule, if adopted, to us could limit our ability to recruit and retain investment professionals and senior management executives. However, the proposed rule remains pending and may be subject to significant modifications.

41







The Dodd-Frank Act requires public companies to adopt and disclose policies requiring, in the event the company is required to issue an accounting restatement, the giveback of any related incentive compensation from current and former executive officers.

The Dodd-Frank Act amended the Exchange Act to compensate and protect whistleblowers who voluntarily provide original information to the SEC and establishes a fund to be used to pay whistleblowers who will be entitled to receive a payment equal to between 10% and 30% of certain monetary sanctions imposed in a successful government action resulting from the information provided by the whistleblower.

On February 9, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Risk Retention Rules do not apply to managers of open-market CLOs - CLOs for which the underlying assets are not transferred by the manager to the CLO issuer via a sale. The agencies have 45 days from the date of the decision to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for an en banc review, during which time the rule will remain effective. If such petition is not made, or if such petition is made but denied, the U.S. Court of Appeals' ruling will become effective 7 days later with retroactive effect on all existing open-market CLOs. We are in the process of reviewing this decision and its ultimate impact on our business.

In June 2010, the SEC approved Rule 206(4)-5 under the Advisers Act regarding “pay to play” practices by investment advisers involving campaign contributions and other payments to government clients and elected officials able to exert influence on such clients. The rule prohibits investment advisers from providing advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years, subject to very limited exceptions, after the investment adviser, its senior executives or its personnel involved in soliciting investments from government entities make contributions to certain candidates and officials in a position to influence the hiring of an investment adviser by such government client. Any failure on our part to comply with the rule could expose us to significant penalties, loss of fees, and reputational damage. In August 2016, the SEC approved “pay to play” regulations proposed by FINRA that are largely similar to the SEC’s regulations and such laws went into effect in August 2017. These FINRA rules effectively prohibit the receipt of compensation from state or local government agencies for solicitation and distribution activities within two years of a prohibited contribution by a broker-dealer or one of its covered associates. There have also been similar laws, rules and regulations and/or policies adopted by a number of states and municipal pension plans, which prohibit, restrict or require disclosure of payments to (and/or certain contracts with) state officials by individuals and entities seeking to do business with state entities, including investment by public retirement funds.

We may be impacted indirectly by guidance recently directed to regulated banking institutions with regard to leveraged lending practices. In March 2013, the U.S. federal banking agencies issued updated guidance on credit transactions characterized by a high degree of financial leverage. To the extent that such guidance limits the amount or increases the cost of financing we are able to obtain for our transactions, the returns on our investments may suffer. However, the status of the 2013 leveraged lending guidance remains in doubt following a determination by the Government Accountability Office, on October 19, 2017, that such guidance constituted a “rule” for purposes of the Congressional Review Act of 1996. As a result, the guidance was required to be submitted to Congress for review. It is possible the guidance could be overturned if a joint resolution of disapproval is passed by Congress.

The current administration’s short-term legislative agenda may include certain deregulatory measures for the U.S. financial services industry, including changes to the Volcker Rule, the U.S. Risk Retention Rules, capital and liquidity requirements, FSOC’s authority and other aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act. On February 3, 2017, the president signed an executive order calling for the administration to review U.S. financial laws and regulations in order to determine their consistency with a set of core principles identified in the order. Various proposals focused on deregulation of the U.S. financial services industry may have the effect of increasing competition for our credit-focused businesses or otherwise reducing investment opportunities. Increased competition from banks and other financial institutions in the credit markets could have the effect of reducing credit spreads, which may adversely affect the revenues of our credit and other businesses whose strategies include the provision of credit to borrowers.

The Dodd-Frank Act, as well as future related legislation, may have an adverse effect on the fund industry generally and/or us, specifically. It is difficult to determine the full extent of the impact on us of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed or whether any of the proposals will become law. Any changes in the regulatory framework applicable to our business, including the changes described above, may impose additional costs on us, require the attention of our senior management or result in limitations on the manner in which we conduct our business. Moreover, there may be an increase in regulatory investigations of the trading and other investment activities of alternative asset management funds, including our funds. Compliance with any new laws or regulations could make compliance more difficult and expensive, affect the manner in which we conduct our business and adversely affect our profitability.


42






The short-term and long-term impact of the Basel III capital standards is uncertain.
In June 2011, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, an international body comprised of senior representatives of bank supervisory authorities and central banks from 27 countries, including the United States, announced the final framework for a comprehensive set of capital and liquidity standards, commonly referred to as “Basel III,” for internationally active banking organizations and certain other types of financial institutions. These new standards, which will be fully phased in by 2019, will require banks to hold more capital, predominantly in the form of common equity, than under the current capital framework. Implementation of Basel III will require implementing regulations and guidelines by member countries. In July 2013, the U.S. federal banking regulators announced the adoption of final regulations to implement Basel III for U.S. banking organizations, subject to various transition periods. Compliance with the Basel III standards may result in significant costs to banking organizations, which in turn may result in higher borrowing costs for the private sector and reduced access to certain types of credit.
Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.
Similar to the environment in the United States, the current environment in jurisdictions outside the United States in which we operate, in particular the EU, hasEurope, have become subject to further regulation.an expanding body of regulation, some of which is complex and prescriptive. Governmental regulators and other authorities in the EUEurope have proposed or implemented a number of initiatives and additional rules and regulations that could adversely affect our business. These include rules and regulations in the United Kingdom (“UK”) that are applicable to our subsidiaries established in the UK, as well as, or in addition to, rules and regulations implemented under European Union (“EU”) directives or regulations, which generally have application throughout the European Economic Area (“EEA”) but may also have substantive differences among EU countries as they are implemented pursuant to each member state’s legislative process.

    In the UK, the principal legislation regulating financial services is the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”) and the principal European legislation affecting the conduct of our business in the EU is implemented under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”) and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”), although there are a number of other pieces of legislation both in the UK and the EU that affect our business, such as the
24


General Data Protection Regulation (and its UK equivalent). The Capital Requirements Regulation togetherFSMA rules and EU laws that have either been adopted into UK law in connection with the recast Capital Requirements Directive (collectively “CRD IV”)UK’s withdrawal from the EU (e.g., reformed the EU'sMarkets in Financial Instruments Regulation) or already implemented in the UK through domestic legislation or regulatory rules prior to such withdrawal (e.g., MiFID and AIFMD), comprehensively regulate the provision of most aspects of our asset management and advisory business in the UK, including sales, research and trading practices, provision of investment advice, corporate finance, dealing, use and safekeeping of client funds and securities, record keeping, margin practices and procedures, approval standards for individuals, anti-money laundering, periodic reporting, settlement procedures, securitization, derivative trading, prudential capital requirements, regime for credit institutionsdata protection, sustainable finance, and investment firms. CRD IV implementsinterest rate benchmarks. Legislation not yet in effect and future legislative initiatives will impact our business. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the key Basel III reforms in the EU. These include amendments to the definition of capital and counterparty credit risk and the introduction of a leverage ratio and liquidity requirements. CRD IV was also used to introduce other reforms, such as to introduce stricter control on remuneration of key employees and risk takers within certain credit institutions and investment firms. The regulation became applicable and member states were required to transpose the Directive's requirements from January 1, 2014. The extent of CRD IV’s impact on a credit institution or investment firm will depend on a variety of factors, including the firm’s size and the nature of its activities. It is possible that other regulators may seek to impose similar controls on remuneration of personnel.  Currently, Carlyle is permitted to disapply certain of CRD IV’s restrictive remuneration provisions.  However, to the extent that European regulators determine that Carlyle must comply with these restrictions or such regulators incorporate similar restrictions into other European directives to which Carlyle is subject, it may be necessary for certainUnited States could adversely affect our business.”
    CECP Advisors LLP (“CECP”), one of our subsidiaries in the UK, is authorized under the FSMA and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”). CECP has permission to change their compensation structuresundertake certain corporate finance activities in the UK—broadly these are advising on, and arranging deals in relation to certain types of, investments. CECP is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.
    CELF Advisors LLP (“CELF”), another one of our subsidiaries in the UK, is also authorized and regulated by the FCA, but has permission to undertake a broader range of regulated activities than CECP, namely, arranging deals in investments, advising on investments, managing investments, dealing in investments as agent, and arranging for key personnel, thereby affecting our abilitythe safeguarding and administration of assets. CELF is only permitted to recruitcarry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and retainprofessional clients.

In 2022, we acquired Abingworth LLP (“Abingworth”), which is authorized and regulated by the FCA, with permissions for establishing, operating or winding up a collective investment scheme, and managing an unauthorized AIF. Abingworth is only permitted to carry out these personnel.activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.

The AIFMD was implementedAlso in most jurisdictions2022, CECP appointed CIC Advisors LLP (“CIC”) as an appointed representative. Under the arrangement, CECP, as the principal of CIC, has accepted regulatory responsibility for CIC of carrying out the activities of advising on investments and arranging deals in investments. Under the appointed representative arrangement, CIC is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.

Following the UK’s exit from the EU on January 31, 2020, and the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020, EEA passporting rights (which previously entitled CECP and CELF to provide certain investment services in or into the EEA on a cross-border basis and Abingworth to market its funds in the EEA on July 22, 2014.a cross-border basis) are no longer available to CECP, CELF and Abingworth. Certain EEA investor-facing activities previously carried on by those firms have been reorganized such that they are now performed by different, EEA-established, affiliates under alternative licensing arrangements, and this may continue to change in the future. These arrangements may subject us to additional regulatory obligations and may impede our ability to raise capital from EEA investors. The UK and the EU announced, on December 24, 2020, that they have reached agreement on a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement (the “TCA”), which addresses the future relationship between the parties. The TCA was approved by the UK Parliament on December 30, 2020. Due to the TCA only being agreed shortly before the end of the transition period, it applied on a provisional basis in the EU until it was formally ratified by the European Parliament and has applied permanently from May 1, 2021. However, the TCA does not substantively address future cooperation in the financial services sector or reciprocal market access into the EU by UK-based firms under equivalence arrangements or otherwise. Nevertheless, as a new agreement, the implications and operations of the TCA may be subject to change and/or develop on short notice. In general,addition, the Temporary Marketing Permission Regime (the “TMPR”) allows AIFMs to continue to market in the UK those funds that were in existence on December 31, 2020, on broadly the same terms as previously applied. Unless extended, the TMPR expires on December 31, 2023. Any marketing of a new fund coming into existence after December 31, 2020, must be under the UK’s national private placement regime.

Certain of our European subsidiaries are subject to compliance requirements in connection with AIFMD, which regulates alternative investment fund managers (“AIFMs”) of a broad range ofestablished in the EEA that manage alternative investment funds (“AIFs”) domiciled within and (depending on. In the circumstances) outsideUK, a retained version of the EEA.AIFMD exists. The AIFMD also regulates and imposes regulatory obligations in respect of the marketing in the EEA by AIFMs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere) of AIFs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere). The AIFMD was intendedgenerally became effective in countries across the EEA in 2014. Currently, Carlyle has three authorized AIFMs in the EEA: AlpInvest, CIM Europe S.a.r.l. (“CIM Europe”) and Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. In the UK, Abingworth is authorized under the UK retained version of AIFMD.
    The AIFMD imposes significant regulatory requirements on AIFMs. The AIFMD regulates fund managers by, among other things, prescribing authorization conditions for an AIFM, restricting the activities that can be undertaken by an AIFM, prescribing the organizational requirements, operating conditions, and regulatory standards relating to have a staged implementation through 2018, but certain key milestones relatedsuch things as initial capital, remuneration, conflicts, risk management, leverage, liquidity management, delegation of duties, transparency and
25


reporting requirements. The AIFMD has the potential to the implementation have been delayed. As a result of the business activities of certain of our subsidiaries, such subsidiaries currently are subject to variousrestrict Carlyle’s fund marketing strategy and places additional compliance obligations on its authorized AIFMs in connection withthe form of, among other things, remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements, leverage oversight and liquidity management.
    Authorized AIFMs are entitled to market their AIFs throughout the EEA under a marketing passport. Under the AIFMD, including investor and regulatory reporting, portfolio company asset stripping restrictions, deal-related notifications and remuneration reporting.an AIFM may, in addition to its fund management activity, also be authorized to provide certain investment services that would otherwise require authorization under MiFID. Authorization under the AIFMD is currently available only to EEA fund managers. AlpInvest one of our subsidiaries, obtained authorization in 2015 and is licensed as an AIFM under the AIFMD byfrom the Authority for Financial Markets in the Netherlands. Additionally,Netherlands (the “AFM”) in 2018, one2015. AlpInvest is also licensed by the AFM to provide some of our subsidiaries,the additional investment services that are otherwise generally reserved to MiFID firms. CIM Europe S.à.r.l., obtained authorization as an alternative investment fund managerAIFM in Luxembourg.Luxembourg in early 2018. Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. registered at the Bank of Italy’s AIFM register under no.127 in 2017.
    The AIFMD obligations applicableallows member states to permit marketing within their member state by non-EEA fund managers (under what are known as national private placement regimes), provided the local law imposes certain minimum requirements. Member states may impose more stringent requirements. At present, some EEA states have chosen not to operate a national private placement regime at all; some EEA states apply the minimum requirements; others require the minimum plus a few additional requirements (e.g., the appointment of a depository); and some require compliance with substantially all of the AIFMD. Certain of Carlyle’s funds are currently offered in selected member states of the EEA in accordance with the national private placement regimes of the relevant EEA jurisdiction.
In 2017, the European Commission started a review of AIFMD. The European Commission published a report on the operation of the AIFMD in January 2019, which identified certain areas requiring further analysis. A subsequent report on the application and scope of the AIFMD was published in June 2020. Following these reports, the European Commission launched a public consultation relating to its review of the AIFMD in October 2020, which closed on January 29, 2021. In November 2021, the European Commission published draft legislation, commonly referred to as “AIFMD II.” The European Commission’s draft legislation proposed a number of amendments to the AIFMD, including more onerous delegation requirements, enhanced substance requirements, additional liquidity management provisions for AIFMs to the extent that they manage open-ended AIFs, and revised regulatory reporting and investor disclosures requirements. The draft proposed significant new requirements relating to the activities of funds that originate loans including new restrictions on the structure that such funds may take. In addition, the draft proposed to introduce new conditions for non-EEA AIFMs, such as certain of our US affiliates, to be able to make use of the national private placement regimes of EEA states, including a condition that the jurisdiction of neither of the AIFM and AIF have been identified as non-cooperative third countries for tax purposes nor deemed by the EU not to comply fully with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and thereby to ensure an effective exchange of information in tax matters. This gives rise to a risk that certain of our AIFs may not be able to take advantage of such regimes to raise capital from EEA investors, potentially with little notice. AIFMD II is currently passing through the EU ordinary legislative process, involving scrutiny and amendment by the European Council and the European Parliament. Agreement on the legislation between the European Commission, European Council and European Parliament is expected to be reached during 2023, after which the final shape of the new regime, and any other subsidiaries may have an adverse effectimpact on us and/or our subsidiaries, will be clearer. The new regime will come into force two years after this final agreement is reached and fully approved with implementation currently expected in 2025.
In August 2021, Directive (EU) 2019/1160 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1156 (the “Cross-Border Marketing Rules”) came into force in the EU. The Cross-Border Marketing Rules were introduced to streamline certain aspects of marketing investment funds by among other things, increasingharmonizing the regulatory burdenability for EU AIFMs to distribute AIFs across the EU, including by introducing a new regime for “pre-marketing.” Moreover, these regulations also impose new restrictions and costs of raising money and doing business in EEA jurisdictions, imposing capital requirements on our business, imposing extensive disclosurenew obligations on certain investmentfund managers that are pre-marketing their funds and portfolio companies, and disadvantaging our investment funds as bidders for and potential owners of private companies located in the EEA when comparedEU. Further, some EU member states (but not all) also apply, or intend to non-AIF/AIFM competitors, which may not be subjectapply, certain of the Cross-Border Marketing Rules to non-EU fund managers (including UK and U.S. fund managers) in relation to the requirementsprocess of the AIFMD.marketing of their funds. Accordingly, our ability to market our funds in EU will vary from country to country notwithstanding this pan-EU regulation.

Certain    As outlined above, certain of our European subsidiaries, notably CECP, CELF and CIC in the UK, must comply with the pan-European regimeregulatory framework established by MiFID (including as retained in the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Directive 2004/39/EC) ("MiFID")UK), which regulates the provision and conduct of investment services and activities throughout the EEA. Certain aspects of MiFID sets outalso apply to AlpInvest by virtue of its MiFID “top up” permission as part of its AIFMD authorization. MiFID prescribes detailed requirements governing the organization and business conduct of business of investment firms, regulated markets and certain other entities such as credit institutions to the extent they perform investment services or activities. It also includes pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for securities markets and extensive transaction reporting requirements for transactions within scope.


43






The latest iteration of MiFID, has been substantially amended by Directive 2014/65/EU and(“MiFID II”) together with the accompanying Regulation (EU) No 600/2014/EU (collectively referred to as "MiFID II") that, save for certain provisions, has been effective from January 3, 2018. MiFID II is designed to amend the functioning of financial markets2014 (the “Markets in light of the financial crisis and to strengthen investor protection. MiFID II hasFinancial Instruments Regulation” or “MiFIR”), extended the MiFID requirements in a number of areas including market structure requirements, new and extended requirementsrequire investment firms to comply with more prescriptive and onerous obligations in relation to transparencysuch things as: costs and charges disclosure, product design and governance, the receipt and payment of inducements, the receipt of and payment for investment research, suitability and appropriateness assessments, conflicts of interest, record-keeping, best
26


execution, transaction and trade reporting, revisedremuneration, training and competence and corporate governance. Failure to comply with MiFID II and its associated legislative acts could result in sanctions from national regulators, the loss of market access and a number of other adverse consequences which would have a detrimental impact on our business. Although the UK has now withdrawn from the EU, its rules implementing MiFID continue to have effect and MiFIR has been adopted into UK law (subject to certain amendments to ensure it operates properly in a UK-specific context) in connection with this withdrawal.
The UK has introduced a new prudential regulatory framework for UK investment firms (the “Investment Firm Prudential Regime” or the “IFPR”), which is closely based on an equivalent regulatory framework introduced at the EU-level through the EU Investment Firm Regulation and Investment Firm Directive (together “IFR/IFD”). The IFPR took effect from January 1, 2022, and applies to our subsidiaries that are UK investment firms under MiFID II, namely CECP and CELF. Under the IFPR, among other requirements, both CECP and CELF are required to maintain a more onerous policy on remuneration, set an appropriate ratio between the variable and fixed components of total remuneration and meet requirements on the structure of variable remuneration. These requirements may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain staff. Importantly, the broad discretion for UK firms that used to be available to disapply certain remuneration rules on researchthe basis of “proportionality” does not apply in relation to IFPR. Under IFPR, CECP and inducementsCELF will each also have to make public disclosure on their websites in relation to their (i) own funds, own funds requirements and product governance requirements.structures; (ii) risk management; and (iii) remuneration. The new public disclosure requirements mandate more detail including quantitative information on remuneration paid to staff. IFPR has resulted in increased regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements for CECP in particular and may continue to increase the costs of doing business and may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.

In the EU, IFR/IFD took effect from June 26, 2021 and represents a complete overhaul of “prudential” regulation in the EU and substantially increases regulatory capital requirements for certain investment firms and imposes more onerous remuneration rules, and revised and extended internal governance, disclosure, reporting, liquidity, and group “prudential” consolidation requirements (among other things). IFR/IFD affects AlpInvest, one of our subsidiaries, since it is an AIFM in the Netherlands with top-up permissions to provide investment services. In particular, as AlpInvest’s assets under management attributable to separate accounts regulated by MiFID II (as defined below) increases so will AlpInvest’s regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements, which may increase the costs of doing business and may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.
The UK is introducing an important and substantial regime, the “Consumer Duty,” designed to improve outcomes for retail investors, aspects of which will begin to apply from July 31, 2023. Although Carlyle entities do not generally deal with consumers in the ordinary sense, the regime may potentially apply to certain of our future funds. On December 2, 2022, the FCA published a consultation proposal that would, if implemented, remove an important exemption that is currently available to asset managers of investment funds and potentially make the impact of the Consumer Duty more significant and widespread. This could have important implications for Carlyle entities if they are unable to rely on another exemption. We will continue to work closely with external counsel and advisors to monitor these developments.
Other Jurisdictions
    Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to registration and compliance with laws and regulations of non-U.S. governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to, among other things, investment advisory services and the marketing of investment products, and any failure to comply with these regulations could expose us to liability and/or damage our reputation. Certain of our private funds are also required to comply with the trading and disclosure rules and regulations of non-U.S. securities regulators.
    The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has therefore imposed further compliancedeveloped Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”) rules for the automatic exchange of FATCA-like financial account information amongst OECD member states. Like FATCA, CRS imposes certain due diligence, documentation and reporting requirements on our European operations, requiring additionalvarious Carlyle entities. While CRS does not contain a potential withholding requirement, non-compliance could subject Carlyle to certain reputational harm and potential financial penalties.
    Carlyle Hong Kong Equity Management Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity in respect of professional investors.
Carlyle Asia Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 4 (advising on securities) regulated activities in respect of professional investors.
Carlyle Global Credit (HK) Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 4 (advising on securities) regulated activities in respect of professional investors.
    Carlyle Mauritius Investment Advisor Limited and Carlyle Mauritius CIS Investment Management Limited are licensed providers of investment management timeservices in the Republic of Mauritius and resources.are subject to applicable Mauritian
In December 2011, China’s National Development
27


securities laws and Reform Commission (the "NDRC Regulation") issuedthe oversight of the Financial Services Commission. Carlyle Mauritius Investment Advisor Limited holds a new circular regulating“Foreign Institutional Investor” license from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which entitles this entity to engage in limited activities of private equity funds established in China. The circular established new rules relating toIndia. Carlyle Mauritius CIS Investment Management Limited holds a “Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor” license from the establishment, fundraising and investment scope of such funds; risk control mechanisms; basic responsibilities and duties of fund managers; information disclosure systems; and record filing. As a supplement to the NDRC regulations in August 2014, China Securities Regulatory Commission, (“CSRC”),which entitles this entity to invest in certain permitted financial instruments (including equity) and derivatives traded or listed on exchanges in the Chinese securities regulator, promulgatedPeoples Republic of China.
    Carlyle Australia Equity Management Pty Limited is licensed by the Interim RegulationsAustralian Securities and Investments Commission as an Australian financial services licensee and is authorized to carry on a financial services business to provide advice on and deal in financial products (managed investment schemes and securities) for wholesale clients.
    Carlyle Japan Equity Management L.L.C. (“CJEM”) is registered with the SupervisionFinancial Services Agency of Japan to carry out Type II Financial Instruments Business as a Japanese Type II Financial Instruments Business Operator and Administrationit is also a member of Privatethe T2FIFA, a self-regulatory organization in Japan. Pursuant to this registration, CJEM is permitted to perform marketing activities to and private placements for specified investors with respect to interests in a limited partnership.
    Carlyle MENA Investment Funds (the “CSRC Regulations”). These new regulations adoptAdvisors Limited, a very broad definitioncompany limited by shares in the Dubai Financial Centre, holds a Category 3C license issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority and is authorized to arrange credit or deal in investments, advise on financial products or credit and manage collective investment funds.

Carlyle MENA Advisors Limited, a company limited by shares in the Abu Dhabi Global Market, is authorized by the Abu Dhabi Financial Services Regulatory Authority and is authorized to arrange deals in investments, advise on investments or credit and manage collective investment funds.
    Carlyle Singapore Investment Advisors Pte Limited holds a capital markets license and an exempt financial adviser status with the Monetary Authority of private investment funds, potentially including private equity funds.Singapore to carry on fund management and dealing in regulated capital market products activities in respect of institutional and accredited investors. In recent years, regulations, directivesaddition, we expect AlpInvest Partners Pte Limited to receive a similar license and guidelinesstatus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
    Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. holds an authorization from amongst others, the Administration for IndustryBank of Italy to carry on AIFMD-compliant fund management and Commerce andreal estate activities. It is registered at the Bank of Italy’s AIFM register under no.127.
    Carlyle Investments (Canada) Corporation, formerly Diversified Global Asset Management AssociationCorporation, holds an exempt market dealer license with Ontario Securities Commission to facilitate certain Carlyle fund marketing activities in Canada.
    AlpInvest is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment management company with the Financial Supervisory Service of China (“AMAC”) have continued to regulate privateSouth Korea.
Carlyle CLO Management LLC is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment funds incorporated in China. For example, duringmanagement company with the courseFinancial Supervisory Service of 2016. AMAC issued “Guidelines for Internal Control of Privately-raised Investment Fund Managers” (February, 2016), “Administrative Measures for Information Disclosure of Privately-raised Investment Fund” (February, 2016), “Announcement on Further Regulating Relevant Matters Concerning the Registration of the Managers of the Privately-Raised Funds” (February, 2016), “Measures for the Administration of Private Placement of Private Investment Funds” (April, 2016) and “Private Equity Fund Contract Guidelines No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3” (April, 2016). These regulations may have an adverse effect on us and/or our renminbi (RMB)-denominated investment funds by, among other things, increasing the regulatory burden and costs of raising money for RMB-denominated investment funds, imposing extensive disclosure obligations on RMB-denominated investment funds and their associated portfolio companies, and disadvantaging our investment funds as bidders, imposing significant capital requirements on managers of RMB denominated investment funds, imposing numerous registrations and ongoing filings by privateSouth Korea.
    An investment fund managersadvised by us holds an indirect controlling interest in China with multiple government authorities.

The legislativeFortitude Re, a Bermuda company registered as a Class 4 and regulatory framework for privacy and data protection issues worldwide is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. The Company collects personally identifiable information (PII) and other data as an integral part of its business processes and activities. This dataClass E insurer. Fortitude Re is subject to a variety of U.S.regulation and international lawssupervision by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA”) and regulations, including oversight by various regulatory or other governmental bodies. Many foreign countriescompliance with all applicable Bermuda law and governmental bodies, including the European UnionBermuda insurance statutes and other relevant jurisdictions where we conduct business, have laws and regulations, concerning the collection and use of PII and other data obtained from their residents or by businesses operating within their jurisdiction that are more restrictive than those in the U.S. Additionally, in May 2016, the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (the "GDPR"), which will impose more stringent data protection requirements and will provide for greater penalties for noncompliance beginning in May 2018. A failure to comply with the GDPR could result in fines up to 20 million Euros or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is higher. Further, any inability, or perceived inability, to adequately address privacy and data protection concerns, or comply with applicable laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, contractual obligations, or other legal obligations, even if unfounded, could result in additional cost and liability and could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business.

The EU has adopted certain risk retention and due diligence requirements (“EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements”) in respect of various types of EU-regulated investors including our credit institutions, authorized AIFMs, investment firms, insurance and reinsurance undertakings and (subject to the completion of secondary legislation) Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) funds.  Among other things, such requirements restrict an investor who is subject to the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements, from investing in securitizations, including funds managed by us, unless: (i) the originator, sponsor or original lender in respect of the relevant securitization has explicitly disclosed that it will retain, on an on-going basis, a net economic interest of not less than 5% in respect of certain specified credit risk tranches or securitized exposures; and (ii) that investor is able to demonstrate that it has undertaken certain due diligence in respect of various matters including but not limited to its note position, the underlying assetsInsurance Act of 1978 (Bermuda) and (in the case of certain types of investors) the relevant sponsor or originator. 

To the extent the EU Risk Retention Rules are to be satisfied through the EU “sponsor” option, it is expected that the holder of the EU retention interest will be authorized by the UK Financial Conduct Authority under the Financial Servicesrules and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Bermuda Insurance Act”) and capitalized (with regulatory capital and other required resources) in a manner necessary or advisable to enable it to satisfy the requirements of FSMA, MiFID II and relevant FCA rules.. In addition, such “sponsor” holding the EU retention interest would be required to demonstrate that: (a) it meets the definition of investment firm under the CRR, (b) it is authorized to, and does, carry on a business of providing investment management services and activities listed in

44






paragraph (7) of Section A of Annex 1 of MiFID II (placing of financial instruments without a firm commitment basis), and (c) it is a “sponsor” for the purposes of Article 405 of the CRR. For purposes of these requirements, “CRR” means Regulation No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (as amended from time to time and as implemented by Member States of the European Union) together with any implemented or delegated regulations, technical standards and guidance related thereto. Whether a collateral manager of a CLO qualifies as an EU “sponsor” under the CRR will depend upon the MiFID authorizations (or permissions) the collateral manager holds from its EU home country supervisor.
Certain of the CLOs currently being managed by one of our affiliates have been designed to comply with the EU Risk Retention Rules via the “sponsor” approach. For these CLOs, CELF Advisors LLP, one of our asset-management affiliates with the required MiFID II permissions to act as the “sponsor” of CLOs, has undertaken to hold the EU retention interests. In the future, certain other newly-formed affiliates may serve as “sponsor” and holder of the EU retention interests on CLO investments.
The EU Retention Rules may also be satisfied if the “originator” holds the EU retention interest. Article 4(1)(13) of the CRR defines “Originator” as either (1) an entity that itself or through related entities, directly or indirectly, was involved in the original agreement which created the obligations or potential obligations of the debtor or potential debtor giving rise to the exposure being securitized or (2) an entity that purchases a third party’s exposures for its own account and then securitizes them. In the future, certain newly-formed affiliates may serve as “originator” and holder of the EU retention interest on CLO investments.
The European Commission, on September 30, 2015, published a proposal to amend the CRR (the "CRR Amendment Regulation") and a proposed regulation relating to a European framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations (such regulation, including any implementing regulation, technical standards and official guidelines related thereto, the "Securitization Framework" and, together with the CRR Amendment Regulation, the "Securitization Regulation") which would, amongst other things, re-cast the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements as part of wider changes to establish a "Capital Markets Union" in Europe (including, but not limited to, the imposition of a direct retention obligation on eligible risk retainers, transparency and due diligence requirements, as well as certain restrictions in connection with the retention of risk as an originator). On May 30, 2017, the European Commission, European Council of Ministers and European Parliament each announced that a political agreement had been reached in principle on the Securitization Regulation. Among other matters, the European Parliament announced that the minimum net economic interest required to be retained under the new regulation would remain at 5% irrespective of the permitted method of retention used. The Securitization Regulation (2017/2402/EU) entered into force on January 17, 2018, but will apply on and from January 1, 2019. On December 15, 2017, the European Banking Authority (“EBA”) launched a public consultation on its draft Regulatory Technical Standards specifying certain requirements for originators, sponsors and original lenders in relation to risk retention pursuant to the Securitization Regulation. The consultation will close on March 15, 2018. There are material differences between the current EU retention requirements and the requirements which will apply under the Securitization Regulation. Specifically, pursuant to Article 410(1) of the CRR, the EBA is required to report to the European Commission annually on measures taken by competent authorities to ensure compliance with the retention requirements of Articles 404-410. Articles 404-410 of the CRR will be repealed in their entirety by the CRR Amendment Regulation (2017/2401/EU) and will be replaced by provisions of the Securitization Framework, which will require a report from the European Commission on the functioning of the Securitization Regulation, together with a draft legislative proposal if appropriate, to be delivered to the European Council and Parliament within three years of its entry into force.
Though the Securitization Regulation will apply to securitizations the securities of which are issued on or after January 1, 2019, there can be no assurance as to whether relevant transactions or any potential refinancing will be affected by the Securitization Regulation or any change thereto or review thereof. There can also be no assurances as to whether relevant transactions or any potential refinancing will be affected by any other change in law or regulation relating to the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements, including as a result of ownership of Fortitude by our investment fund, certain Carlyle affiliates that serve as general partner and investment advisor to the fund are subject to certain insurance laws and regulations in Bermuda as a “controller” of Fortitude Re under the Bermuda Insurance Act. These laws and regulations include certain notice requirements for any changes recommended in future reportsperson that has become, or reviews. Failureas a result of a disposition ceased to be, a shareholder controller of a registered insurer, and failure to comply with one such requirements is an offense punishable by law.
    In addition, we and/or more of the requirements of the Securitization Regulationsour affiliates and subsidiaries may result in various penalties, including, in the case of those investorsbecome subject to additional regulatory capital requirements, the imposition of a punitive capital charge on the notes issued by our CLOs acquired by the relevant investor. In addition such regulations could have a negative impact on the price and liquidity of certain of our EU CLO notes in the secondary market.

In December 2015, the EBA produced guidelines to set appropriate aggregate limits to shadow banking entities when carrying out banking activities. These guidelines came into effect on January 1, 2017. While most alternative investment funds are excluded from the definition of “shadow banking entity,” funds that use leverage on a substantial basis at fund level or have certain third-party lending exposures are within the definition. When dealing with shadow banking entities, the EEA financial institution would be required to implement additional effective processes (including with respect to due diligence) and set internal aggregate and individual limits to such exposures where they exceed 0.25% of the institution’s eligible capital. While

45






the guidelines do not themselves introduce a quantitative limit to institutions’ exposures to shadow banking entities at the individual or aggregate exposure level, they place the responsibility on the banking sector to demonstrate that risks are managed effectively. Affected institutions will be required to set internal aggregate and individual limits to exposures to individual shadow banking entities which could limit or restrict the availability of credit and/or increase the cost of credit from these institutions for impacted funds.
In May 2017, the European Central Bank (“ECB”) issued guidance on leveraged transactions. The ECB guidance applies to significant credit institutions supervised by the ECB in member states of the euro zone. Under the guidance, credit institutions are expected to have in place internal policies that include a definition of “leveraged transactions”. Loans or credit exposures to a borrower should be regarded as leveraged transactions if: (i) the borrower’s post-financing level of leverage exceeds a total debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.0 times; or (ii) the borrower is owned by one or more “financial sponsors”. For these purposes, a financial sponsor is an investment firm that undertakes private equity investments in and/or leveraged buyouts of companies. In summary, credit institutions are expected to define their appetite for underwriting and syndicating transactions, which will include defining acceptable leverage levels. Underwriting of transactions having a ratio of total debt to EBITDA exceeding 6.0 times at deal inception is a high level of leverage and should be exceptional. For most industries, the ECB believes a leverage level in excess of 6.0 times total debt to EBITDA should raise concerns. Following these guidelines, credit institutions in the euro zone coulddemands in the future limit, delay or restrict the availability of credit and/or increase the cost of credit for funds or portfolio companies involved in leveraged transactions. Credit institutions may be reluctant to enter into a leveraged transaction having a ratio of total debt to EBITDA exceeding 6.0 times absent an appropriate justification.
Our investment businesses are subject to the risk that similar measures might be introducedextent we expand our investment advisory business in other countries in which our funds currently have investmentsexisting and new jurisdictions. There are also a number of pending or plan to invest in the future, or that otherrecently enacted legislative orand regulatory measures that negatively affect their respective portfolio investments might be promulgated in any of the countries in which they invest. The reporting related to such initiatives may divert the attention of our personnel and the management teams of our portfolio companies. Moreover, sensitive business information relating to us or our portfolio companies could be publicly released.
See—“Risks Related to Our Business Operations —Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the United States” and “Part I. Item 1. Business — Regulatory and Compliance Matters”—for more information.
Rapidly changing regulations regarding derivatives and commodity interest transactions could adversely impact various aspects of our business.
The regulation of derivatives and commodity interest transactions in the United States and other countries is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to ongoing modification by governmental and judicial action. We and our affiliates enter into derivatives and commodity interest transactions for various purposes, including to managearound the financial risks related to our business. Accordingly, the impact of this evolving regulatory regime on our business is difficult to predict, but itworld that could be substantial and adverse.
Among other things, the CFTC adopted certain amendments to its existing rules that potentially subject certain of our affiliated entities to registration, reporting and record-keeping obligations in connection with derivatives transactions (including for hedging/risk management purposes). As such, our business may incur increased ongoing costs associated with monitoring compliance with the CFTC registration and exemption obligations across platforms and complying with the various reporting and record-keeping requirements.

In addition, derivatives regulations in the United States and Europe are effectively transforming an over-the-counter market in which parties negotiate directly with each other into a regulated market in which a majority of swap transactions are executed on registered exchanges and cleared through central counterparties. These regulations could significantly increase the cost of entering into derivative contracts (including through requirements to post collateral which could adversely affect our available liquidity), materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against risks that we encounter, reduce our ability to restructure our existing derivative contracts, and increase our exposure to less creditworthy counterparties. We are evaluating final rules promulgated separately by the CFTC and certain U.S. prudential regulators, as well as the rules issued by EMIR to determine the impact on our business. If we reduce our use of derivatives as a result of such regulations (and any new regulations), our results of operations may become more volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to satisfy our debt obligations or plan for and fund capital expenditures.
Furthermore, the CFTC has proposed rules relating to position limits on derivatives (including futures, options and swaps) with certain underlying reference assets, as well as supplemental rules relating to the aggregation of derivative positions

46






among commonly owned or controlled entities and exemptions from such aggregation. In December 2016, the CFTC finalized the rules related to the aggregation of positions, but proposed for further comment the position limit rules. It is unclear when the CFTC intends to finalize such rules. In addition to these U.S. requirements, we are subject to, where relevant and applicable, position limit requirements in Europe under MiFID II and related rules. Specifically, under MiFID II, national competent authorities (including the FCA), within EU member states, are required to establish position limits in relation to the maximum size of positions which a relevant person can hold in certain commodity derivatives. The limits apply to contracts traded on trading venues and their economically equivalent OTC contracts. The position limits established, as amended from time to time, and our ability to rely on any exemption thereunder may affect the size and types of investments we may make. Moreover, in order to avoid exceeding position limits, it is possible that we and our affiliates may need to significantly alter our business processes related to such trading, including by modifying trading strategies and instructions.
We are subject to substantial litigation risks and may face significant liabilities and damage to our professional reputation as a result of litigation allegations and negative publicity.
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to the risk of substantial litigation and face significant regulatory oversight. In recent years, the volume of claims and the amount of potential damages claimed in such proceedings against the financial services industry have generally been increasing. The investment decisions we make in our asset management business and the activities of our investment professionals on behalf of portfolio companies of our carry funds may subject them and us to the risk of third-party litigation arising from investor dissatisfaction with the performance of those investment funds, alleged conflicts of interest, the activities of our portfolio companies and a variety of other litigation claims and regulatory inquiries and actions. From time to time we and our portfolio companies have been and may be subject to regulatory actions and shareholder class action suits relating to transactions in which we have agreed to acquire public companies.
To the extent that investors in our investment funds suffer losses resulting from fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct or other similar misconduct, investors may have remedies against us, our investment funds, our principals or our affiliates. Heightened standards of care or additional fiduciary duties may apply in certain of our managed accounts or other advisory contracts. To the extent we enter into agreements with clients containing such terms or applicable law mandates a heightened standard of care or duties, we could, for example, be liable to certain clients for acts of simple negligence or breach of such duties, which might include the allocation of a client’s funds to our affiliated funds. Even in the absence of misconduct, we may be exposed to litigation or other adverse consequences where investments perform poorly and investors in or alongside our funds experience losses. The general partners and investment advisers to our investment funds, including their directors, officers, other employees and affiliates, are generally indemnified with respect to their conduct in connection with the management of the business and affairs of our investment funds. For example, we have agreed to indemnify directors and officers of Carlyle Capital Corporation Limited in connection with the matters involving that fund discussed under “Part I. Item 3. Legal Proceedings.” However, such indemnity generally does not extend to actions determined to have involved fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct or other similar misconduct.
In addition, the laws and regulations governing the limited liability of such issuers and portfolio companies vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and in certain contexts the laws of certain jurisdictions may provide not only for carve-outs from limited liability protection for the issuer or portfolio company that has incurred the liabilities, but also for recourse to assets of other entities under common control with, or that are part of the same economic group as, such issuer. For example, if one of our portfolio companies is subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings in a jurisdiction and is found to have liabilities under the local consumer protection, labor, tax or bankruptcy laws, the laws of that jurisdiction may permit authorities or creditors to file a lien on, or to otherwise have recourse to, assets held by other portfolio companies (including the Partnership) in that jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that the Partnership will not be adversely affected as a result of the foregoing risks.
If any lawsuits were brought against us and resulted in a finding of substantial legal liability, the lawsuit could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could materially impact our business. We dependSee Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to a large extent on our business relationshipsRegulation and our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our funds. As a result, allegations of improper conduct by private litigants (including investors in or alongside our funds) or regulators, whether the ultimate outcome is favorable or unfavorable to us, as well as negative publicity and press speculation about us, our investment activities or the private equity industry in general, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation, which may be more damaging to our business than to other types of businesses.
In addition, with a workforce composed of many highly paid professionals, we face the risk of litigation relating to claims for compensation, which may, individually or in the aggregate, be significant in amount. The cost of settling any such claims could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

47






Employee misconduct or fraud could harm us and subject us to significant legal liability and reputational harm, which could impair our ability to attract and retain investors in our funds. Fraud, other deceptive practices or other misconduct at our portfolio companies could similarly subject us to liability and reputational damage and also harm performance.

There have been a number of highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the financial services industry in recent years, and there is a risk that our employees or advisors could engage in misconduct or fraud that adversely affects our business. Misconduct or fraud by employees, advisors or other third-party service providers could cause significant losses. Employee misconduct or fraud could include, among other things, binding the Partnership to transactions that exceed authorized limits or present unacceptable risks and other unauthorized activities or concealing unsuccessful investments (which, in either case, may result in unknown and unmanaged risks or losses), or otherwise charging (or seeking to charge) inappropriate expenses. It is not always possible to deter misconduct or fraud by employees or service providers, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases.

Our ability to attract and retain investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our funds depends heavily upon the reputation of our professionals, especially our senior Carlyle professionals. Because of our diverse business and the regulatory regimes under which we operate, we are subject to a number of obligations and standards (and related policies and procedures) arising from our asset management business and our authority over the assets managed by our asset management business. The violation of these obligations and standards (and related policies and procedures) by any of our employees would adversely affect us and our investment funds and fund investors. For example, we could lose our ability to raise new investment funds if any of our “covered persons” is the subject of a criminal, regulatory or court order or other “disqualifying event. See “—Litigation—Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties.penalties,

Our business often requires that we deal with confidential matters of great significance to companies in which our funds may invest. If our employees, advisors or other third-party service providers were to use or disclose confidential information improperly, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position “Financial regulations and current and future business relationships, as well as face potentially significant litigation. It is not always possible to detect or deter employee misconduct or fraud, including financial fraud or the misappropriation of funds of our business or our investment funds, and the extensive precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effectivechanges thereto in all cases. If any of our employees were to engage in misconduct or fraud or were to be accused of such misconduct or fraud, whether or not substantiated, our business and our reputation could be adversely affected and a loss of investor confidence could result, which would adversely impact our ability to raise future funds.
In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) and the SEC have devoted greater resources to enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). In addition, the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions have significantly expanded the reach of their anti-bribery laws. While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our personnel with the FCPA and the UK anti-bribery laws, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances to prevent violations. Any determination that we have violated the FCPA, the UK anti-bribery laws or other applicable anticorruption laws could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects, financial position or the market value of our common units.
In addition, we will also be adversely affected if there is fraud, other deceptive practices or other misconduct by personnel of the portfolio companies in which our funds invest. For example, improper or illegal conduct by personnel at our portfolio companies or failure by such personnel to comply with anti-bribery, trade sanctions, legal and regulatory requirementsStates could adversely affect our business and reputation. Such misconduct or fraudthe possibility of increased regulatory focus could also undermine any due diligence effortsresult in additional burdens and expenses on our business” and “Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.���
    Our businesses have operated for many years within a framework that requires our being able to monitor and comply with respecta broad range of legal and regulatory developments that affect our activities and we take our obligation to comply with all
28


such companieslaws, regulations and could negatively affectinternal policies seriously. Our reputation depends on the valuationintegrity and business judgment of our employees and we strive to maintain a fund’s investments.
Certainculture of compliance throughout the firm. We have developed, and adhere to, compliance policies and procedures implemented to mitigate potentialsuch as codes of conduct, compliance systems, education and communication of compliance matters. These policies focus on matters such as insider trading, anti-corruption, document retention, conflicts of interest, anti-money laundering and address certainother matters. Our legal and compliance team monitors our compliance with all of the legal and regulatory requirements may reduce the synergies across our various businesses and inhibit our ability to maintain our collaborative culture.
We consider our “One Carlyle” philosophy and the ability of our professionals to communicate and collaborate across funds, industries and geographies one of our significant competitive strengths. As a result of the expansion of our platform into various lines of business in the alternative asset management industry, our acquisition of new businesses, and the growth of our managed account business,which we are subject and manages our compliance policies and procedures. Our legal and compliance team also monitors the information barriers that we maintain to a numberrestrict the flow of actual and potential conflicts of interest and subject to greater regulatory oversight than that to which we would otherwise be subject if we had just one line of business. In addition, as we expand our platform, the allocation of investment opportunities among our investment funds is expected to become more

48






complex. In addressing these conflicts and regulatory requirementsconfidential information, including material, nonpublic information, across our various businesses, we havebusiness. Our enterprise risk management function analyzes our operations and may continueinvestment strategies to implement certain policiesidentify key risks facing the firm and procedures (for example, information barriers). Asworks closely with the legal and compliance team to address them. The firm also has an independent and objective internal audit department that employs a practical matter, the establishmentrisk-based audit approach that focuses on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, enterprise risk management functions and maintenanceother areas of such information barriers meansperceived risk and aims to give management and our Board of Directors reasonable assurance that collaboration between our investment professionals across various platforms or with respect to certain investments may be limited, reducing potential synergies that we cultivate across these businesses through our “One Carlyle” approach. For example, although we maintain ultimate control over the Investment Solutions segment's constituent firms: AlpInvestrisks are well-managed and Metropolitan, we have erected an information barrier between the management teams at these firmscontrols are appropriate and the rest of Carlyle. See “—Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Our Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks.” In addition, we may come into possession of material, non-public information with respect to issuers in which we may be considering making an investment. As a consequence, we may be precluded from providing such information or other ideas to our other businesses that could benefit from such information.effective.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations
Risks Related to the Assets We Manage
The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive.
Poor performance of our investment funds would cause a decline in our revenue, income and cash flow, may obligate us to repay carried interest previously paid to us, and could adversely affect our ability to raise capital for future investment funds.
The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common stock.
Our asset management business depends in large part on our ability to raise capital from third-party investors. If we are unable to raise capital from third-party investors, we would be unable to collect management fees or deploy their capital into investments and potentially collect carried interest, which would materially reduce our revenue and cash flow and adversely affect our financial condition.
We have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to retail investors, which could expose us to new and greater levels of risk.
Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.
Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance and accrued performance allocations.
The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with investments by our investment funds may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment.
Changes in the debt financing markets or higher interest rates could negatively impact the ability of certain of our funds and their portfolio companies to obtain attractive financing or re-financing and could increase the cost of such financing if it is obtained, which could lead to lower-yielding investments and could potentially decrease our net income.
Our funds invest in relatively high-risk, illiquid assets, and we may fail to realize any profits from these activities for a considerable period of time or lose some or all of our principal investments.
Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the United States.
Certain of our fund investments may be concentrated in particular asset types or geographic regions, which could exacerbate any negative performance of those funds to the extent those concentrated investments perform poorly.
Our private equity funds’ performance, and our performance, has been and may in the future be adversely affected by the financial performance of our portfolio companies and the industries in which our funds invest.

Industry Risks Related to the Assets We Manage
Our real estate funds are subject to risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
Our energy business is involved in oil and gas investments (i.e., exploration, production, storage, transportation, logistics, refining, marketing, trading, petrochemicals, energy services and other opportunistic investments), which entail a high degree of risk.
Investments in the natural resources industry, including the infrastructure and power industries, involve various operational, construction and regulatory risks.
Our CLO business and investment into CLOs involves certain risks.
3


Investments in the insurance industry (including our investment in Fortitude) could be adversely impacted by insurance regulations and potential regulatory reforms.
Our Global Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may decline due to the large number of shares of common stock eligible for future sale.
Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.
Our founders have the right to designate members of our Board of Directors.
Our certificate of incorporation does not limit the ability of our former general partner, founders, directors, officers or stockholders to compete with us.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that stockholders might consider favorable.
Risks Related to Taxation
Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments (companies) or fund income.
U.S. and foreign tax regulations could adversely affect our ability to raise funds from certain foreign investors and increase compliance costs.
On January 1, 2020, we completed our conversion from a Delaware limited partnership named The Carlyle Group L.P. into a Delaware Corporation named The Carlyle Group Inc. Pursuant to the conversion, at the specified effective time on January 1, 2020, each common unit of The Carlyle Group L.P. outstanding immediately prior to the effective time converted into one share of common stock of The Carlyle Group Inc. and each special voting unit and general partner unit was canceled for no consideration. In addition, holders of the partnership units in Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P., and Carlyle Holdings III L.P. exchanged such units for an equivalent number of shares of common stock and certain other restructuring steps occurred (the conversion, together with such restructuring steps and related transactions, the “Conversion”).
    Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this report to “Carlyle,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer (i) prior to the consummation of the Conversion to The Carlyle Group L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries and (ii) from and after the consummation of the Conversion to The Carlyle Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to our common stock or shares in periods prior to the Conversion refer to the common units of The Carlyle Group L.P. When we refer to our “senior Carlyle professionals,” we are referring to the partner-level personnel of our firm. References in this report to the ownership of the senior Carlyle professionals include the ownership of personal planning vehicles of these individuals. When we refer to the “Carlyle Holdings partnerships” or “Carlyle Holdings,” we are referring to Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P., and Carlyle Holdings III L.P., which prior to the Conversion were the holding partnerships through which the Company and our senior Carlyle professionals and other holders of Carlyle Holdings partnership units owned their respective interests in our business.
“Carlyle funds,” “our funds” and “our investment funds” refer to the investment funds and vehicles advised by Carlyle.
“Carry funds” generally refers to closed-end investment vehicles, in which commitments are drawn down over a specified investment period, and in which the general partner receives a special residual allocation of income from limited partners, which we refer to as carried interest, in the event that specified investment returns are achieved by the fund. Disclosures referring to carry funds will also include the impact of certain commitments which do not earn carried interest, but are either part of, or associated with our carry funds. The rate of carried interest, as well as the share of carried interest allocated to Carlyle, may vary across the carry fund platform. Carry funds generally include the following investment vehicles across our three business segments:
Global Private Equity: Buyout, middle market and growth capital, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds advised by Carlyle, as well as certain energy funds advised by our strategic partner NGP Energy Capital Management (“NGP”) in which Carlyle is entitled to receive a share of carried interest (“NGP Carry Funds”)
Global Credit: Opportunistic credit, aircraft finance, and other closed-end credit funds advised by Carlyle
4


Global Investment Solutions: Funds and vehicles advised by AlpInvest Partners B.V. (“AlpInvest”), which include primary fund, secondary and portfolio financing, and co-investment strategies
Carry funds specifically exclude certain legacy Abingworth funds in which Carlyle is not entitled to receive a share of carried interest, collateralized loan obligation vehicles (“CLOs”), our business development companies and associated managed accounts, as well as capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude (defined below) alongside a carry fund.
For an explanation of the fund acronyms used throughout this Annual Report, refer to “Item 1. Business–Our Global Investment Offerings.”
“Fee-earning assets under management” or “Fee-earning AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise from which we derive recurring fund management fees. Our Fee-earning AUM is generally based on one of the following, once fees have been activated:
(a)the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired and for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period;
(b)the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co-investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired, as well as one of our business development companies;
(c)the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our CLOs and other securitization vehicles, as defined in the fund indentures (typically exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date;
(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(e)the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement;
(f)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), excluding cash and cash equivalents, of one of our business development companies and certain carry funds; or
(g)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired.
“Assets under management” or “AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise. Our AUM equals the sum of the following:
(a) the aggregate fair value of our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those funds and vehicles (including Carlyle commitments to those funds and vehicles and those of senior Carlyle professionals and employees) pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those funds and vehicles;
(b)     the amount of aggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or aggregate principal amount of the notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions);
(c)     the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(d)        the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement; and
(d)     the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of our business development companies, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles.
    We include in our calculation of AUM and Fee-earning AUM the Legacy Energy Funds (defined below) that we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (“Riverstone”) and the NGP Carry Funds that are advised by NGP. Our calculation of AUM also includes third-party capital raised for the investment in Fortitude through a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund and from a strategic investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside the fund. The total AUM and Fee-earning AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude is inclusive of the net asset value of
5


investments in Carlyle products. These amounts are also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested.
    For most of our carry funds, total AUM includes the fair value of the capital invested (among other elements as described above). Fee-earning AUM includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital, depending on whether the original investment period for the fund has expired, which does not reflect any net appreciation in the value of capital invested by such carry funds. As such, total AUM may be greater than Fee-earning AUM when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments exceeds the cost of those investments.
    Our calculations of AUM and Fee-earning AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. In addition, our calculation of AUM (but not Fee-earning AUM) includes uncalled commitments to, and the fair value of invested capital in, our investment funds from Carlyle and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to management or performance fees. Our calculations of AUM or Fee-earning AUM are not based on any definition of AUM or Fee-earning AUM that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage or advise.
“Perpetual Capital” refers to the assets we manage or advise which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors upon the realization of investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law. Perpetual Capital may be materially reduced or terminated under certain conditions, including reductions from changes in valuations and payments to investors, including through elections by investors to redeem their investments, dividend payments, and other payment obligations, as well as the termination of or failure to renew the respective investment advisory agreements. Perpetual Capital includes: (a) assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, (b) our Core Plus real estate fund, (c) our business development companies and certain other direct lending products, and (d) our Interval Fund.
“Fortitude” refers to Fortitude Group Holdings, LLC (“Fortitude Holdings”) prior to October 1, 2021 and to FGH Parent, L.P. (“FGH Parent”) as of October 1, 2021. On October 1, 2021, the owners of Fortitude Holdings contributed their interests to FGH Parent such that FGH Parent became the direct parent of Fortitude Holdings. Fortitude Holdings owns 100% of the outstanding common shares of Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled reinsurer (“Fortitude Re”). See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the Company’s strategic investment in Fortitude.
“Legacy Energy Funds” include Energy III, Energy IV, and Renew II and are managed with Riverstone and its affiliates. Affiliates of both Carlyle and Riverstone act as investment advisers to each of the Legacy Energy Funds. Carlyle has a minority representation on the management committees of Energy IV and Renew II. Carlyle and Riverstone each hold half of the seats on the management committees of Energy III. The investment periods for these funds have expired and the remaining investments in each fund are being disposed of in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2022, the Legacy Energy Funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $0.2 billion in AUM and $0.4 billion in Fee-earning AUM. We are no longer raising capital for the Legacy Energy Funds and expect these balances to continue to decrease over time as the funds wind down.
“Metropolitan” or “MRE” refers to Metropolitan Real Estate Management, LLC, which was included in the Global Investment Solutions business segment prior to its sale on April 1, 2021.
6


PART I.
ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
Overview
    Carlyle is a global investment firm with deep industry expertise that deploys private capital across three business segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions. Our teams invest across a range of strategies that leverage our deep industry expertise, local insights, and global resources to deliver attractive returns throughout an investment cycle. Since our firm was founded in Washington, D.C. in 1987, we have grown to manage $373 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2022. Our experienced and diverse team of more than 2,100 employees includes more than 770 investment professionals in 29 offices across five continents, and we serve more than 2,900 active carry fund investors from 88 countries.
    We seek to invest with a clarity of purpose, adaptability, and alignment between our interests and the interests of our fund investors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. We continue to execute against our strategy, with a focus on the following priorities:
Grow our business. We pursue new opportunities, both organic and inorganic, that build on our strengths in our three global business segments and further diversify our product offerings.
Scale our platform. We identify strategies and opportunities that enable us to further scale our business, often in adjacent opportunities, such as Capital Markets and Insurance Solutions.

Drive efficiencies across our business. We seek ways to optimize our investment process by focusing on the development of our people, continuous process improvement and unlocking the value of our data.
    Operational and strategic highlights for our firm for 2022 include:
Assets under management grew 24% to $373 billion as of December 31, 2022 from $301 billion as of December 31, 2021, and fee-earning assets under management increased 38% to $267 billion, reflecting fundraising of $29.9 billion, as well as the impact of the strategic transactions outlined below. Perpetual Capital products now comprise $58 billion, or 22%, of our fee-earning assets under management.
During 2022, we completed the following transactions with the goal of driving accretive growth on an inorganic basis:
In March 2022, we acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”), totaling $15 billion in assets under management which were integrated into our Global Credit platform.
In April 2022, we entered into a strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude to provide certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services. As of December 31, 2022, we had $46 billion of Perpetual Capital associated with the agreement, on which we earn a recurring management fee.
In August 2022, we acquired Abingworth, a life sciences investment firm, to expand our healthcare investment platform with the addition of nearly $2 billion in assets under management and a specialized team of over 20 investment professionals and advisors.
We invested $34.8 billion in our carry funds during 2022 and realized proceeds of $33.8 billion for our carry fund investors. Our net accrued performance revenues increased to $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2022 from $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2021, despite realizing $1.0 billion in realized net performance revenues during the year, driven by carry fund appreciation of 11%, which reflects the strength of our portfolio construction, as well as the value creation activities in our portfolio.
We remained focused on the professional development and the health and well-being of our employees in 2022. We continued to roll out several leadership development programs and implemented a well-being strategy focused on enabling employees to foster emotional, physical, financial, environmental, and social well-being.
7


During 2022, with feedback received from employee surveys, we continued to reimagine our processes, office environment and business operations.
We continued to significantly enhance our ESG and DEI efforts:
We became a signatory of the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, and remain involved with several important industry initiatives in the field, including, among others, the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, the International Sustainability Standards Board Investor Advisory Group (IIAG), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) Global Responsible Investment Steering Committee, and the One Planet Private Equity Funds initiative.
We held a Sustainability Workshop in May 2022 that welcomed more than 60 guests from our portfolio companies and included sessions on developing resilient climate strategies and leading practices for employee engagement.
We continued to deepen the integration of ESG within our investment teams and portfolio companies, with ESG assessments included in most Carlyle investment decisions using proprietary due diligence tools in our GPE and Global Credit segments.
We invested in enhancing DEI through our second year of the DEI Incentive Awards program, where we granted approximately $2 million in awards to 70 employees from around the globe who made an impact on DEI at Carlyle.

We launched the DEI Leadership Network, a coalition of portfolio company CEOs around the globe to develop a peer group for shared resources and insights that can help advance DEI within their respective companies.

Operational and strategic highlights for our three global business segments for 2022 include:
Global Private Equity (“GPE”):
During 2022, GPE invested $19.9 billion across the segment, including $14.5 billion in the Americas, $2.7 billion in Europe, and $2.7 billion in Asia.
Our GPE funds realized proceeds of $22.5 billion for our GPE carry fund investors in 2022, across a mix of trade-sales, public market block trades, recapitalizations, and dividends.
During 2022, we raised $10.6 billion in new capital commitments for our GPE funds, which included the launch of our fifth Europe technology fund (“CETP V”) and our second renewable energy fund (“CRSEF II”).
Global Credit:
In total, we raised $15.3 billion in new capital commitments to our Global Credit products during 2022, and doubled overall AUM to $146.3 billion, reflecting fundraising as well as the impact of the CBAM and Fortitude transactions on capital formation.
In our CLO business, we closed $2.7 billion of new CLOs in the U.S. and $1.2 billion of new CLOs in Europe during 2022. Including the impact of the CBAM transaction, we have $48.6 billion of total AUM across all of our CLOs at December 31, 2022, an increase in CLO AUM of 47% over 2021.
In Carlyle Aviation Partners, we completed the acquisition of AMCK Aviation’s portfolio of aircraft, including 145 narrow-body aircraft.
We had continued strength in direct lending, executing $3.9 billion of gross originations in 2022, which included originations from a newly launched evergreen fund (“CDLF”).
8


Global Investment Solutions:
During 2022, we raised $4.0 billion in capital commitments, including over $3.5 billion in capital commitments to separately managed accounts, and deployed $6.6 billion in investments across our Global Investment Solutions platform. Our portfolio appreciated 6% (4% excluding the positive impact of foreign currency translation) during the year and we realized proceeds of $7.2 billion for our Global Investment Solutions investors.
Business Segments
    We operate our business across three segments: (1) Global Private Equity, (2) Global Credit and (3) Global Investment Solutions. Information about our segments should be read together with “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Global Private Equity
    Our GPE segment advises our buyout, growth, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds. Across our GPE funds, as of December 31, 2022, we had investments in more than 300 active portfolio companies that employ more than 1.3 million people around the world. Our GPE teams have the following areas of focus:
Corporate Private Equity. Our corporate private equity teams advise a diverse group of funds that invest in transactions that focus either on a particular geography or strategy. Our buyout funds focus on corporate buyouts and strategic minority investments. The investment mandate for our growth capital funds is to seek out companies with the potential for disruptive growth. Our core strategy seeks longer duration private equity opportunities, targeting stable businesses with sustainable market leadership, which have opportunities for operational improvement. Our corporate private equity funds are advised by teams of local professionals who live and work in the markets where they invest. In 2022, we invested $12.8 billion in new and follow-on investments through our corporate private equity funds. As of December 31, 2022, our corporate private equity funds had, in the aggregate, $105.4 billion in AUM.
Real Estate. Our real estate team advises real estate funds that invest in the U.S. and Europe, with a focus on a broad range of opportunities including residential properties, senior living facilities, industrial properties, and self-storage properties, but have limited our exposure to office buildings, hotels and retail properties. Our real estate funds generally focus on acquiring single-property assets rather than large-cap companies with real estate portfolios and made more than 1,450 investments in more than 700 cities or metropolitan statistical areas around the world from inception through December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, our real estate funds managed, in the aggregate, $30.3 billion in AUM.
Infrastructure & Natural Resources. Our active infrastructure and natural resources funds focus on infrastructure and energy investing. Our infrastructure business is comprised of teams that invest in six primary sectors: renewables, energy infrastructure, water and waste, transportation, digital infrastructure, and power generation. Our energy activities focus on buyouts, growth capital investments and strategic joint ventures in the midstream, upstream, downstream, energy and oilfield services sectors around the world. Our international energy investment team focuses on investments across the energy value chain outside of North America. We conduct our North American energy investing through our strategic investment in NGP, a Texas-based energy investor. As of December 31, 2022, we managed $27.3 billion in AUM through our infrastructure and natural resources funds.
The following table presents certain data about our Global Private Equity segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).
AUM(1)
% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Active
Investments
Active
Funds(3)
Available
Capital
Investment
Professionals(2)
Amount Invested
Since Inception
Investments Since
Inception
$16344%$10886871$39442$2162,436
9


(1)Total AUM includes NGP, which advises seven funds with $12.7 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2022. Through our strategic partnership with NGP, we are entitled to 55% of the management fee-related revenue of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP Energy Funds, and an allocation of income related to the carried interest received by the fund general partners of the NGP Carry Funds.
(2)Total GPE investment professionals excludes NGP employees.
(3)Active GPE funds includes seven NGP Carry Funds advised by NGP. We do not control NGP, and we do not serve as an investment adviser to the NGP funds.
Global Credit
    Our Global Credit segment, which had $146.3 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2022, advises products that pursue investment strategies across the credit spectrum, including: liquid credit, illiquid credit, and real assets credit, as well as platform initiatives such as Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund (“CTAC,” or the “Interval Fund”). Global Credit, which also includes our Insurance Solutions and Global Capital Markets businesses, has been Carlyle’s fastest-growing segment in the past four years, with total AUM nearly doubling in 2022 alone. Since our establishment in 1999, these various capital sources provide the opportunity for Carlyle to offer highly customizable and creative financing solutions to borrowers to meet their specific capital needs. Carlyle draws on the expertise and underwriting capabilities of our 233 investment professionals and leverages the resources and industry expertise of Carlyle’s global network to provide creative solutions for borrowers.
    Primary areas of focus for our Global Credit platform include:
Liquid Credit
Loans and Structured Credit. Our structured credit funds invest primarily in performing senior secured bank loans through CLOs and other investment vehicles. In 2022, in addition to our acquisition of the management contracts on the CBAM portfolio, we closed six new U.S. CLOs and three CLOs in Europe with an aggregate size of $2.7 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, our loans and structured credit team advised structured credit funds totaling $50.4 billion in AUM.
Illiquid Credit
Direct Lending. Our direct lending business includes our business development companies (“BDCs”) that invest primarily in middle market first-lien loans (which include unitranche, “first out” and “last out” loans) and second-lien loans of middle-market companies, typically defined as companies with annual EBITDA ranging from $25 million to $100 million, that lack access to the broadly syndicated loan and bond markets. As of December 31, 2022, our direct lending investment team advised AUM totaling $9.4 billion.
Opportunistic Credit. Our opportunistic credit team invests primarily in highly-structured and privately-negotiated capital solutions supporting corporate borrowers through secured loans, senior subordinated debt, mezzanine debt, convertible notes, and other debt-like instruments, as well as preferred and common equity. The team will also look to invest in special situations (i.e., event-driven opportunities that exhibit hybrid credit and equity features) as well as market dislocations (i.e., primary and secondary market investments in liquid debt instruments that arise as a result of temporary market volatility). In certain investments, our funds may seek to restructure pre-reorganization debt claims into controlling positions in the equity of the reorganized companies. As of December 31, 2022, our opportunistic credit team advised products totaling $12.8 billion in AUM.
Real Assets Credit
Aircraft Finance. Carlyle Aviation Partners is our multi-strategy investment platform that is engaged in commercial aviation aircraft financing and investment throughout the commercial aviation industry. As of December 31, 2022, Carlyle Aviation Partners had approximately $11.5 billion in AUM across carry funds, securitization vehicles, liquid strategies, and other vehicles.
Infrastructure Debt. Our Infrastructure debt team invests primarily in directly originated and privately negotiated debt instruments related to global infrastructure projects, primarily in the power, energy, transportation, water/waste, telecommunications and social infrastructure sectors. The team focuses primarily on senior, subordinated, and mezzanine debt and seeks to invest primarily in developed markets within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”). As of December 31, 2022, our infrastructure debt team managed $3.7 billion in AUM.
10


Other Credit
Platform Initiatives. Our platform initiatives include CTAC, our closed-end interval fund which invests across Carlyle’s entire credit platform, as well as cross-platform separately managed accounts which are tailored to invest across Carlyle’s credit platform based on the specific investment needs of individual investors. These products also include structured solutions which focus on private, primarily investment-grade investments, backed by assets with contractual cash flows. As of December 31, 2022, the Global Credit platform initiatives represented $6.1 billion in AUM.
Insurance Solutions. Carlyle Insurance Solutions (“CIS”) combines our deep insurance expertise with portfolio construction capabilities, capital sourcing and asset origination strengths to provide comprehensive liability funding and reinsurance, asset management and advisory solutions for (re)insurance companies and fund investors. The CIS team oversees the investment in Fortitude, as well as the strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude. As of December 31, 2022, AUM related to capital raised from third-party investors to acquire a controlling interest in Fortitude was $5.7 billion. As of December 31, 2022, AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement was $45.2 billion, including the net asset value of investments in Carlyle products, which is also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested. Fortitude and certain Fortitude reinsurance counterparties have committed approximately $9.2 billion of capital to-date to various Carlyle strategies.
Global Capital Markets. Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) is a loan syndication and capital markets business that launched in 2018. The primary focus of GCM is to arrange, place, underwrite, originate and syndicate loans and underwrite securities of third parties and Carlyle portfolio companies through TCG Capital Markets and TCG Senior Funding. TCG Capital Markets is a FINRA registered broker dealer. GCM may also act as the initial purchaser of such loans and securities. GCM receives fees, including underwriting, placement, structuring, transaction and syndication fees, commissions, underwriting and original issue discounts, interest payments and other compensation, which may be payable in cash or securities or loans, in respect of the activities described above and may elect to waive such fees.
    The following table presents certain data about our Global Credit segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).     
AUM% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Active
Funds
Investment
Professionals
$14639%$121122233
Global Investment Solutions
    Our Global Investment Solutions segment, established in 2011, provides comprehensive investment opportunities and resources for our investors and clients to build private equity portfolios through fund of funds, secondary purchases or financings of existing portfolios and managed co-investment programs. Global Investment Solutions executes these activities through AlpInvest, one of the world’s largest investors in private equity.
    The primary areas of focus for our Global Investment Solutions teams include:

Private Equity Secondary and Portfolio Finance Investments. Funds managed by AlpInvest build an investment portfolio of private equity owned assets through the acquisition of limited partnership interests in the secondary market and other types of transactions such as fund recapitalizations, portfolio restructurings and spin-outs, and portfolio financings. Private equity investors who desire to sell or restructure their pre-existing investment commitments to a fund may negotiate to sell the fund interests to AlpInvest. In this manner, AlpInvest’s secondary and portfolio finance investments team provides the full range of liquidity and restructuring solutions from debt to equity for third-party private equity investors. As of December 31, 2022, our secondary and portfolio finance investments program totaled $21.0 billion in AUM.

Private Equity Co-investments. AlpInvest invests alongside other private equity and mezzanine funds in which it or certain AlpInvest limited partners typically has a primary fund investment throughout Europe, North America and Asia. These investments are generally made when an investment opportunity is too large for a particular fund and the sponsor of the fund therefore seeks to raise additional “co-investment” capital from sources such as AlpInvest. As of December 31, 2022, our co-investment programs totaled $17.2 billion in AUM.
11



Private Equity Fund Investments. Our fund of funds vehicles advised by AlpInvest make investment commitments directly to buyout, growth capital, venture and other alternative asset funds advised by other general partners. As of December 31, 2022, AlpInvest advised $25.1 billion in AUM in private equity fund investments.
    The following table presents certain data about our Global Investment Solutions segment as of December 31, 2022 (dollar amounts in billions).
AUM(1)
% of Total
AUM
Fee-earning
AUM
Fund 
Vehicles
Available
Capital
Investment
Professionals
Amount Invested
Since Inception
$6317%$38350$2096$87
(1)Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to AlpInvest carry fund vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15% or, in some cases, 40% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).

Investment Approach
Global Private Equity
    The investment approach of our GPE teams is generally characterized as follows:
Consistent and Disciplined Investment Process. We believe our successful investment track record is the result, in part, of a consistent and disciplined application of our investment process. Investment opportunities for our GPE funds are initially sourced and evaluated by one or more of our deal teams. Deal teams consistently strive to be creative and look for deals in which we can leverage Carlyle’s competitive advantages, sector experience and the global platform. The due diligence and transaction review process places a special emphasis on, as appropriate and among other considerations, the reputation of a target company’s shareholders and management, the company’s or asset’s size and sensitivity of cash flow generation, the business sector and competitive risks, the portfolio fit, exit risks and other key factors specific to a particular investment. In evaluating each deal, we consider what expertise or experience we can bring to the transaction to enhance value for our investors. Each investment opportunity must secure approval from the investment committee of the applicable investment fund to move forward. To help ensure consistency, we utilize a standard investment committee process across our GPE funds, although NGP follows its own policies and procedures with respect to its advised funds. The investment committee approval process involves a detailed review of the transaction and investment thesis, business, risk factors and diligence issues, as well as financial models.
Distinctive Portfolio Construction Principles. We seek to proactively manage the construction of our portfolios through deliberate and thoughtful diversification across industries, geographies and cycles, and to avoid certain assets facing economic or industry headwinds. For example, our real estate portfolios have relatively little current exposure to commercial office properties, business hotels and retail properties.

Geographic- and Industry-Focused. We have developed a global network of local investment teams and have adopted an industry-focused approach to investing. Our extensive network of global investment professionals has the knowledge, experience and relationships on a local level that allows them to identify and take advantage of opportunities that may be unavailable to firms that do not have our global reach and resources. We believe that our global platform helps enhance all stages of the investment process, including by facilitating faster and more effective diligence, a deeper understanding of global industry trends and priority access to the capital markets. We have particular industry expertise in aerospace and government services, consumer, media and retail, financial services, healthcare, industrials, technology, real estate, natural resources and infrastructure. As a result, we believe that our in-depth knowledge of specific industries improves our ability to source and create transactions, conduct effective and more informed due diligence, develop strong relationships with management teams and use contacts and relationships within these industries to drive value creation.

Variable Deal Sizes and Creative Structures. We believe that having the resources to complete investments of varying sizes provides us with the ability to enhance investment returns while providing for prudent industry,
12


geographic and size diversification. Our teams are staffed not only to effectively pursue large transactions, but also other transactions of varying sizes. We often invest in smaller companies or single real estate transactions and this has allowed us to obtain greater diversity across our entire portfolio. Additionally, we may undertake large, strategic minority investments with certain control elements or private investment in public equity (PIPE) transactions in large companies with a clear exit strategy. In certain jurisdictions around the world, we may make investments with little or no debt financing and seek alternative structures to opportunistically pursue transactions. We generally seek to obtain board representation and typically appoint our investment professionals and advisors to represent us on the boards of the companies in which we invest. Where our funds, either alone or as part of a consortium, are not the controlling investor, we typically, subject to applicable regulatory requirements, acquire significant voting and other control rights with a view to securing influence over the conduct of the business.

Driving Value Creation. Our GPE teams seek to make investments in portfolio companies and assets in which our particular strengths and resources may be employed to their best advantage. Typically, as part of a GPE investment, our investment teams will prepare and execute a systematic value creation plan that is developed during a thorough due diligence effort and draws on the deep resources available across our global platform, specifically relying on:

Reach. Our global team and global presence enables us to support international expansion of our operating companies’ efforts and global supply chain initiatives.

Expertise. Our deep bench of investment professionals and industry specialists provide extensive sector-specific knowledge and local market expertise. Our investment teams benefit from best-in-class support services and infrastructure provided through the global Carlyle organization. Carlyle’s overall infrastructure and support services cover the full range of administrative functions, including fund management, accounting, legal and compliance, human resources, information technology, tax, and external affairs. Additionally, where appropriate we may seek to partner with third parties whose sector or market expertise may enhance our value creation in an investment. For example, in our U.S. real estate funds we may partner with joint venture partners or managers with significant operational expertise and/or deal sourcing capabilities.

Insights. To supplement our investment expertise, we have retained a group of more than 51 operating executives and advisors as independent consultants to work with our investment teams, provide board-level governance and support and advise our portfolio companies. These operating executives and advisors are typically former CEOs and other high-level executives of some of the world’s most successful corporations and currently sit on the boards of directors of a diverse mix of companies. Operating executives and advisors are independent consultants and are not Carlyle employees. Operating executives and advisors are often engaged by Carlyle primarily to assist with deal sourcing, due diligence and market intelligence. Operating executives and advisors may also be engaged and compensated by our portfolio companies as directors or to otherwise advise portfolio company management.

Data. The goal of our research function is to extract as much information as possible from our portfolio about the current state of the economy and its likely evolution over the near-to-medium term. Our corporate private equity investment portfolio includes 214 active corporate investments as of December 31, 2022, across a diverse range of industries and geographies that each generate multiple data points (e.g., orders, shipments, production volumes, occupancy rates, bookings). By evaluating this data on a systematic basis, we work to identify the data with the highest correlation with macroeconomic data and map observed movements in the portfolio to anticipated variation in the economy, including changes in growth rates across industries and geographies. We incorporate this proprietary data into our investment portfolio management strategy and exit decisions on an ongoing basis. We believe this robust data gives us an advantage over our peers who do not have as large of a global reach.
Talent and Organization Performance. Our investment professionals work to enhance leadership and organizational effectiveness through proprietary and third-party data-driven assessments, best-practice playbooks, and knowledge-sharing forums.
Pursuing Best Exit Alternatives. In determining when to exit an investment, our investment teams consider whether a portfolio company or asset has achieved its objectives, the financial returns (both gross MOIC and net IRR) and the appropriate timing in industry cycles and company or asset development to strive for the optimal value. Each fund’s investment committee approves all exit decisions.
13


Value Creation. Our Global Portfolio Solutions team helps to translate our collaborative culture into services and operational capabilities supporting our investment process and portfolio companies and assets. Our approach ensures that Carlyle’s global network, deep industry knowledge and operational expertise are used to support and enhance our investments.
Information Technology Resources. We have established an information technology capability that contributes to due diligence, portfolio company strategy and portfolio company operations. The capability includes dedicated information technology and business process resources, including assistance with portfolio company risk assessments and enhanced deal analytics.
Digital. Given the increasing importance of digital tools and resources across the global economy, we have established a dedicated group focused exclusively on identifying, developing and implementing digital transformation strategies to help drive growth, unlock value, and drive efficiencies across our portfolio companies.
Procurement. We have developed a leveraged purchasing effort to provide portfolio companies with effective sourcing programs with better pricing and service levels to help create operating value. This program seeks to drive down costs and provide better service on common indirect spend categories and disseminate best practices on managing functional spend in the areas of human capital management, employee benefits, corporate real estate, information technology and treasury and risk. As of December 31, 2022, over 150 portfolio companies are actively participating in the optional program, benefiting from more than 100 category arrangements and preferred vendor arrangements.
ESG. We are committed to the principle that building a better business means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest. As a responsible global organization dedicated to driving value by seeking to serve its stakeholders, Carlyle has made it a priority to invest in a framework and the necessary resources for understanding, monitoring and managing environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) risks and opportunities across our portfolio. We believe ESG provides an additional lens to help us assess and mitigate risks, and identify and capitalize on potential opportunities.
    Global Credit
    The investment approach of our Global Credit platform is generally characterized as follows:
Source Investment Opportunities. Our Global Credit team sources investment opportunities from both the primary and secondary markets through our global network and strong relationships with the financial community. We typically target portfolio companies that have a demonstrated track record of profitability, market leadership in their respective niche, predictable cash flow, a definable competitive advantage and products or services that are value-added to their customer base.

Conduct Fundamental Due Diligence and Perform Capital Structure Analyses. After an opportunity is identified, our Global Credit investment professionals conduct fundamental due diligence to determine the relative value of the potential investment and capital structure analyses to determine credit worthiness. Our due diligence approach typically incorporates meetings with management, company facility visits, discussions with industry analysts and consultants and an in-depth examination of financial results and projections. In conducting due diligence, our Global Credit team employs an integrated, cross-platform approach with industry-dedicated credit research analysts and non-investment grade expertise across the capital structure. Our Global Credit team also seeks to leverage resources from across the firm, utilizing information obtained from our nearly 300 active portfolio companies and lending relationships, 20 credit industry research analysts, and in-house government affairs and economic research teams. We utilize a proprietary ESG materiality assessment tool across our Global Credit platform to help our investment professionals efficiently understand a company’s or asset’s exposure to material ESG risks as part of the due diligence process.

Evaluation of Macroeconomic Factors. Our Global Credit team evaluates technical factors such as supply and demand, the market’s expectations surrounding a company and the existence of short- and long-term value creation or destruction catalysts. Inherent in all stages of credit evaluation is a determination of the likelihood of potential catalysts emerging, such as corporate reorganizations, recapitalizations, asset sales, changes in a company’s liquidity and mergers and acquisitions.
14



Risk Minimization. Our Global Credit team seeks to make investments in companies that are well-positioned to weather downturns and/or below-plan performance. The team works to structure investments with strong financial covenants, frequent reporting requirements and board representation, if possible. Through board representation or observation rights, our Global Credit team works to provide a consultative, interactive approach to equity sponsors and management partners as part of the overall portfolio management process. In our CLO business, our liquid credit team uses an in-house risk and analytics platform to monitor and analyze our portfolio, and repositions the portfolio as appropriate. The analytics platform is also used to generate sensitivity analysis for critical risk factors such as default rates, prepayment rates and liquidation prices.
    Global Investment Solutions
    Our Global Investment Solutions team aims to apply a wide array of capabilities to help clients meet their investment objectives. The investment approach of our Global Investment Solutions platform is generally characterized as follows:
Well-informed, Disciplined Investment Process: We follow a disciplined, highly-selective investment process and seek to achieve diversification by deploying capital across economic cycles, segments and investment styles. Our integrated and collaborative culture across our strategies, reinforced by investment in information technology solutions, provides deep insight into fund manager portfolios and operations to support our rigorous selection process.

Proactive Sourcing: AlpInvest’s extensive network of private equity managers across the globe positions us to identify investment opportunities that may be unavailable to other investors. Our investment strategy is defined by a strong belief that the most attractive opportunities are found in areas that are subject to fewer competitive pressures. As a result, our teams actively seek out proprietary investments that would otherwise be difficult for our investors to access alone.

Global Scale and Presence: Our scale and on-the-ground presence across three continents – Asia, Europe and North America – give us a distinct and comprehensive perspective on the private equity markets. Our stable, dedicated, and experienced teams have deep knowledge of their respective markets across the globe. We believe this enhances our visibility across the global investment market and provides detailed local information that enhances our investment evaluation process.

Our Global Investment Offerings
    The following table provides a breakout of the product offerings and related acronyms included in our total assets under management of $373 billion as of December 31, 2022 for each of our three global business segments (in billions):
Global Private Equity1
$163.1 Global Credit$146.3 
Corporate Private Equity$105.5 
Insurance 5
$51.4 
U.S. Buyout (CP)52.5 Liquid Credit$50.4 
Europe Buyout (CEP)11.5 U.S. CLOs37.1 
Asia Buyout (CAP)11.2 Europe CLOs11.4 
Carlyle Global Partners (CGP)6.5 Revolving Credit1.9 
Europe Technology (CETP)6.2 Illiquid Credit$22.2 
U.S. Growth (CP Growth / CEOF)4.2 Opportunistic Credit (CCOF / CSP)12.8 
Japan Buyout (CJP)3.4 
Direct Lending 6
9.4 
Life Sciences (ABV / ACCD)1.7 Real Assets Credit$16.1 
Other 2
8.3 Aviation (SASOF / CALF)11.5 
Real Estate$30.3 Infrastructure (CICF)3.7 
U.S. Real Estate (CRP)19.2 
Other 7
1.0 
Core Plus Real Estate (CPI)8.0 Platform Initiatives and Other Products$6.1 
International Real Estate (CER)3.1 Carlyle Tactical Private Credit (CTAC)2.0 
Infrastructure & Natural Resources$27.3 Other Platform Initiatives and Products4.1 
NGP Energy 3
12.7 Global Investment Solutions$63.3 
International Energy (CIEP)8.1 Secondary and Portfolio Finance Investments$21.0 
Infrastructure & Renewable Energy 4
6.5 Co-Investments$17.2 
Primary Fund Investments$25.1 
Note: All amounts shown represent total assets under management as of December 31, 2022, and totals may not sum due to rounding. In addition, certain carry funds included herein may not be included in fund performance if they have not made an initial capital call or commenced investment activity.
(1)Global Private Equity also includes assets under management in funds which we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (the “Legacy Energy funds”). The impact of these funds is no longer significant to our results of operations.
(2)Includes our Financial Services (CGFSP), Asia Growth (CAP Growth / CAGP), Sub-Saharan Africa Buyout (CSSAF), South America Buyout (CSABF), Peru Buyout (CPF), MENA Buyout and Ireland Buyout (CICF) funds, as well as platform accounts which invest across Corporate Private Equity strategies.
(3)NGP Energy funds are advised by NGP Energy Capital Management, LLC, a separately registered investment adviser. We do not serve as an investment adviser to those funds.
(4)Includes our Infrastructure (CGIOF), Renewable Energy (CRSEF) and Power funds (CPP / CPOCP).
(5)Includes Carlyle FRL, capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside Carlyle FRL, as well as the fair value of the general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude.
(6)Includes our business development companies (CSL / CARS) and our newly launched evergreen fund (CDLF).
(7)Includes our Energy Credit (CEMOF) and Real Estate Credit (CNLI) funds.
Organizational Structure
    On January 1, 2020, we completed our conversion from a Delaware limited partnership named The Carlyle Group L.P. into a Delaware corporation named The Carlyle Group Inc. Our common stockholders are entitled to one vote per share and to vote on all matters on which stockholders of a corporation are generally entitled to vote on under Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), including the election of our Board of Directors.
    In connection with the Conversion, senior Carlyle professionals and certain of the other former limited partners of Carlyle Holdings who became holders of shares of common stock in connection with the Conversion were generally required to grant an irrevocable proxy to Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., which is wholly owned by our founders and other senior Carlyle professionals. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Common Stock—Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.”

Limited Partner Relations
Our diverse and sophisticated investor base includes more than 2,900 active investors in our products located in 88 countries. Included among our many longstanding fund investors are pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies and high net worth individuals in the United States, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and South America.
We have a dedicated in-house investor relations group that strives to cultivate long-term, strategic partnerships with our limited partners. Our team combines strong segment sales with firm-level strategy and coordination to bring the best of Carlyle to our limited partners. Each segment team consists of a combination of geographically focused professionals and dedicated product specialists who collaborate to deliver on investor needs. Segment teams are supported by a central staff responsible for data analytics and additional fulfillment responsibilities. In addition, our Carlyle Private Wealth team is dedicated to fundraising in the private wealth channel globally, and is organized regionally within each of its three constituent segments: Family Wealth, Wealth Management and National Accounts.
Our Investor Relations professionals are in regular dialogue with our fund investors, enabling us to monitor investor preferences and tailor future fund offerings to meet investor demand. We seek to secure a first-mover advantage with key investors, often by establishing a local presence and providing a broad and diverse range of investment opportunities. We continually endeavor to expand our partnerships by sharing our insights and perspectives on the market and investment environment, as well as discussing how we can help the investor achieve their objectives. We continue to use technology to augment our fund transparency and communication around insights as well as facilitate consistent dialogue through both virtual and in-person meetings and events. This partnership approach to fundraising has been critical in raising $81.2 billion over the past two years.
As of December 31, 2022, approximately 94% of commitments (by dollar amount) were from investors who are committed to more than one product and approximately 76% of commitments (by dollar amount) were from investors who are committed to more than five products. We believe the loyalty of our carry fund investor base, as evidenced by our substantial number of multi-fund relationships, enhances our ability to raise new funds and successor funds in existing strategies.
Investor Services
    We have a team of 790 investor services professionals worldwide. The investor services group performs a range of functions to support our investment teams, LP relations group and the corporate infrastructure of Carlyle. Our investor services professionals provide an important control function, ensuring that transactions are structured pursuant to the partnership agreements, assisting in global regulatory compliance requirements and investor reporting to enable investors to easily monitor
15


the performance of their investments. We have devoted substantial resources to creating comprehensive and timely investor reports, which are increasingly important to our investor base. The investor services group also works closely with the investment teams throughout each fund’s lifecycle, from fund formation and investments to portfolio monitoring and fund liquidation. We maintain an internal global legal and compliance team, which includes 40 professionals and a government relations group of five professionals with a presence around the globe as of December 31, 2022.
Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds
    We conduct the sponsorship and management of our carry funds and other investment vehicles primarily through limited partnerships, which are organized by us, to accept commitments and/or funds for investment from institutional investors and high net worth individuals. In general, each investment fund that is a limited partnership, or “partnership” fund, has a general partner that is responsible for the management and operation of the fund’s affairs and makes all policy and investment decisions relating to the conduct of the investment fund’s business. Generally, the limited partners of such funds take no part in the conduct or control of the business of such funds, have no right or authority to act for or bind such funds and have no influence over the voting or disposition of the securities or other assets held by such funds, although such limited partners may vote on certain partnership matters including the removal of the general partner or early liquidation of the partnership by majority vote, as discussed below. Most of our funds also have an investor advisory committee, comprising representatives of certain limited partners, which may consider and/or waive conflicts of interest or otherwise consult with the general partner on certain partnership matters. In the case of certain separately managed accounts advised by us, the investor, rather than us, may control the asset or the investment decisions related thereto or certain investment vehicles or entities that hold or have custody of such assets.

    Each investment fund and in the case of our separately managed accounts, the client, engages an investment adviser. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. (“CIM”) or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates serves as an investment adviser for most of our carry funds and is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (“CGCIM”) is an affiliate of CIM and serves as investment adviser for most of our Global Credit carry funds, as well as two of our BDCs and the Interval Fund and is registered under the Advisers Act. The business of Carlyle Aviation Partners includes investment funds organized to invest in certain aviation-related securities and physical assets (including aircraft, engines and components), and certain of the advisers and general partners of such funds are currently not registered under the Advisers Act or otherwise operated in reliance on another entity’s registration under the Advisers Act. Our investment advisers are generally entitled to a management fee from each investment fund for which they serve as investment advisers. For a discussion of the management fees to which our investment advisers are entitled across our various types of investment funds, see “Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” below.
    Investment funds themselves typically do not register as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act” or the “Investment Company Act”), in reliance on Section 3(c) or Section 7(d) thereof. Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act exempts from the 1940 Act’s registration requirements investment funds whose securities, at the time of acquisition of such securities, are owned by “qualified purchasers” as defined under the 1940 Act who purchase their interests in a private placement. Section 3(c)(1) of the 1940 Act exempts from the 1940 Act’s registration requirements privately placed investment funds whose securities are beneficially owned by not more than 100 persons and who purchase their interests in a private placement. In addition, under certain current interpretations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Section 7(d) of the 1940 Act exempts from registration any non-U.S. investment fund all of whose outstanding securities are beneficially owned either by non-U.S. residents or by U.S. residents that are qualified purchasers and purchase their interests in a private placement. Certain of our investment funds, however, rely on other exemptions from the 1940 Act or register as investment companies under the 1940 Act or elect to be regulated as BDCs under the 1940 Act.
    The governing agreements of the vast majority of our investment funds provide that, subject to certain conditions, a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of third-party investors in those funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause and/or to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause. In addition, the governing agreements of many of our investment funds generally require investors in those funds to affirmatively vote to continue the commitment period in the event that certain “key persons” in our investment funds do not provide the specified time commitment to the fund or our firm ceases to control the general partner (or similar managing entity) or the investment adviser or ceases to hold a specified percentage of the economic interests in the general partner (any such events, a “Key Person Event”).
    With limited exceptions, our carry funds, BDCs, Interval Fund, NGP Predecessor Funds, and certain other investment vehicles, are closed-end funds. In a closed-end fund structure, once an investor makes an investment, the investor is generally not able to withdraw or redeem its interest, except in very limited circumstances. Furthermore, the governing agreement of each investment vehicle contains restrictions on an investor’s ability to transfer its interest in the fund. In the open-end funds we advise, investors’ interests are usually locked up for a period of time after which investors may generally redeem their interests on a quarterly basis, to the extent that sufficient cash is available.
16


    With respect to our closed-end Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds, investors generally agree to fund their commitment over a period of time. For such carry funds, the commitment period generally runs until the earliest of (i) the sixth anniversary of either the effective date (as defined in the applicable limited partnership agreement), or the initial closing date; (ii) the fifth anniversary of the final closing date of the fund; (iii) the date the general partner cancels the investors’ obligation to fund capital contributions due to changes in applicable laws, business conditions or when at least a significant portion (which may range between 75% and 90%) of the capital commitments to the fund have been invested, committed or reserved for investments; (iv) the date a supermajority in interest (based on capital commitments) of investors vote to terminate the commitment period; or (v) the occurrence of a Key Person Event, unless upon any of these events the investors vote to continue the commitment period. Following the termination of the commitment period, an investor generally will be released from any further obligation with respect to its undrawn capital commitment except to the extent necessary to pay partnership expenses and management fees, fund outstanding borrowings and guarantees, complete investments with respect to transactions committed to prior to the end of the commitment period and make follow-on investments in existing investments (collectively, the “post-termination obligations”). Generally, an investor’s obligation to fund follow-on investments continues following the end of the commitment period, although certain funds do not have a time limit and there may be limitations on how much the fund is permitted to fund for such follow-on investments. In those funds where such limitations exist, they generally range from 15-20% of the fund’s aggregate capital commitment.
    For the latest generation of our closed-end real estate funds, the length of the commitment period varies from fund to fund, typically running for a period of between two and five years from the final closing date, provided that the general partner may unilaterally extend such expiration date for one year and may extend it for another year with the consent of a majority of the limited partners for that fund. Investors in the latest generation of our closed-end real estate funds are also obligated to continue to make capital contributions with respect to follow-on investments and to repay indebtedness for a period of time after the original expiration date of the commitment period, as well as to fund partnership expenses and management fees during the life of the fund.

    The term of each of the closed-end Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds generally will end 10 years from the initial closing date, or in some cases, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances (e.g., six years, in the case of certain Carlyle Aviation Partners funds) or later if extended by the general partner (in many instances with the consent of a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of the investors or the investment advisory committee) for successive one-year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Certain of such investment funds may have a longer initial termination date (such funds, “longer-dated funds”), such as 15 years from the final closing date, or may be open-ended.
    With respect to our Global Investment Solutions vehicles and separately managed accounts, the commitment period generally runs for a period of one to five years after the initial closing date of the vehicle. The term of each of the funds generally will end 8 to 12 years from the initial closing date. In some cases, the termination date may be later if extended by the general partner (in many instances with the consent of a majority in interest (based on capital commitments) of the investors or the investment advisory committee) for successive up to three-year periods, or until such time as is reasonably necessary for the general partner to be able to liquidate the fund’s assets.
Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure
    Fund Management Fees. We provide management services to funds in which we hold a general partner interest or with which we have an investment advisory agreement. For closed-end carry funds in the Global Private Equity and Global Credit segments, management fees generally range from 1.0% to 2.0% of commitments during the fund’s commitment period. With respect to Global Private Equity carry funds, such management fees are generally based on limited partners’ capital commitments to the funds and with respect to Global Credit carry funds, such management fees are generally based on limited partners’ invested capital. Following the expiration or termination of the commitment period, management fees generally are based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and the rate charged may also be reduced. These terms may vary for separately managed accounts, open-end funds and longer-dated carry funds and other closed end funds. The investment adviser will receive management fees during a specified period of time, which is generally ten years from the initial closing date, or, in some instances, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances or later if extended for successive one-year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Depending on the contracted terms of the investment advisory agreement and related agreements, these fees are generally called semi-annually in advance. For certain open-end and longer-dated carry funds, management fees are called quarterly in arrears over the life of the funds.
    Within the Global Credit segment, for CLOs and other structured products, management fees generally range from 0.4% to 0.5% based on the total par amount of assets or the aggregate principal amount of the notes in the CLO and are due quarterly. Management fees for the CLOs and other structured products are governed by indentures and collateral management agreements. The investment advisers will receive management fees for the CLOs until redemption of the securities issued by the CLOs. Management fees for the BDCs are due quarterly in arrears at annual rates that range from 1.00% of net asset value (as adjusted for capital called, dividends reinvested, distributions paid and issuer share repurchases made) to 1.5% of gross assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents). Management fees for the Interval Fund are due monthly in arrears at the annual
17


rate of 1.0% of the month-end value of the Interval Fund’s net assets. Carlyle Aviation Partners’ funds have varying management fee arrangements depending on the strategy of the particular fund. Under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, the Company earns a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability and which is due quarterly in arrears.
    The investment advisers of our Global Investment Solutions carry funds generally receive an annual management fee that ranges from 0.25% to 1.0% of the fund’s capital commitments or its committed capital to investments during the commitment fee period of the relevant fund. Following the expiration of the commitment fee period, the management fees generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% on (i) net invested capital; (ii) the lower of cost or net asset value of the capital invested; or (iii) the net asset value for unrealized investments. In some cases, management fees are charged based on net invested capital of underlying investments for the entire duration of the applicable Global Investment Solutions carry funds. The management fees we receive from our Global Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles typically are payable quarterly in advance.
    Our equity interest in NGP entitles us to an allocation of income equal to 55% of the management fee-related revenues of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP Energy Funds.
    The general partners or investment advisers to certain of our Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds from time to time receive customary transaction fees upon consummation of many of our funds’ acquisition transactions, receive monitoring fees from many of their portfolio companies following acquisition and may from time to time receive other fees in connection with their activities. The ongoing monitoring fees that they receive are generally calculated either as a fixed amount or as a percentage of a specified financial metric of a particular portfolio company. The transaction fees that they receive are generally calculated either as a fixed amount or as a percentage (that generally ranges up to 1%, but may exceed 1% in certain circumstances) of the total enterprise value or capitalization of the investment. The management fees charged to investors in our carry funds are generally reduced by 80% to 100% of the allocable portions of such transaction fees, monitoring fees, and certain other fees that are received by the general partners and their affiliates. For our most recent vintages, management fees are generally not offset by fees received by Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) in connection with capital markets activities.
    In addition, Carlyle Aviation Partners may receive servicing fees in connection with asset-backed financing transactions for certain Carlyle Aviation Partners funds, generally in the range of 2% of rents, incentive fees up to 5% of rents in the aggregate, and 3% of sales proceeds earned from such assets. To the extent the financing instruments are held by the funds, these fees are generally offset against management fees or partnership expenses of the funds.
    Performance Allocations. The general partner of each of our carry funds also receives carried interest from the carry funds. Carried interest entitles the general partner to a special residual allocation of profit on third-party capital. In the case of our closed-end carry funds, carried interest is generally calculated on a “realized gain” basis, and each general partner is generally entitled to a carried interest equal to 20% allocation (or approximately 2% to 12.5% in the case of most of our more mature Global Investment Solutions carry funds) of the net realized profit (generally taking into account unrealized losses) generated by third-party capital invested in such fund. Net realized profit or loss is not netted between or among funds. Our senior Carlyle professionals and other personnel who work in these operations also own interests in the general partners of our carry funds and we generally allocate 45% of any carried interest that we earn to these individuals in order to better align their interests with our own and with those of the investors in the funds. A limited portion of the carried interest may be distributed to such individuals in shares of our common stock. Of the carried interest that we retain, we utilize a portion for our new carried interest pool program that commenced in 2019 for certain of our employees who do not receive direct allocations of carried interest to further align their interests with those of our investors. For most carry funds, the carried interest is subject to an annual preferred return of 7% to 9% and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement). These terms may vary on longer-dated funds, certain credit funds, and our external co-investment vehicles. If, as a result of diminished performance of investments later in the life of a closed-end fund, the fund does not achieve investment returns that (in most cases) exceed the preferred return threshold or (in almost all cases) the general partner receives in excess of the allocated carried interest, we will be obligated to repay the amount by which the carried interest that was previously distributed to us exceeds amounts to which we are ultimately entitled. This obligation, which is known as a “giveback” obligation, operates with respect to a given carry fund’s own net investment performance only and is typically capped at the after-tax amount of carried interest received by the general partner. Each recipient of carried interest distributions is individually responsible for his or her proportionate share of any “giveback” obligation, and we have historically withheld a portion of the cash from carried interest distributions to individuals as security for potential “giveback” obligations. However, we may guarantee the full amount of such “giveback” obligation in respect of amounts received by Carlyle and certain other amounts. With respect to the portion of any carried interest allocated to the firm, we expect to fund any “giveback” obligation from available cash. Our ability to generate carried interest is an important element of our business and carried interest has historically accounted for a significant portion of our income.
    The receipt of carried interest in respect of investments of our carry funds is dictated by the terms of the partnership agreements that govern such funds, which generally allow for carried interest distributions in respect of an investment upon a
18


realization event after satisfaction of obligations relating to the return of capital from all realized investments, any realized losses, allocable fees and expenses and the applicable annual preferred return. Carried interest is ultimately realized and distributed when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of; (ii) certain costs borne by the investors have been reimbursed; (iii) the investment fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return; and (iv) we have decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to investors. Distributions to eligible senior Carlyle professionals in respect of such carried interest are generally made shortly thereafter. Our decision to realize carry considers such factors as the level of embedded valuation gains, the portion of the fund invested, the portion of the fund returned to investors and the length of time the fund has been in carry, as well as other qualitative measures. Our Global Investment Solutions funds are not eligible for carried interest distributions until all capital contributions for investments and expenses and the preferred return hurdle have been returned. Although Carlyle has seldom been obligated to pay a giveback obligation, such obligation, if any, in respect of previously realized carried interest, is generally determined and due upon the winding up or liquidation of a carry fund pursuant to the terms of the fund’s partnership agreement, although in certain cases the giveback is calculated at prior intervals.
    With respect to our separately managed accounts, BDCs and the Interval Fund, carried interest is generally referred to as an “Incentive Fee.” Incentive Fees consist of performance-based incentive arrangements pursuant to management contracts when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. Incentive Fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved.
    Under our arrangements with the historical owners of Carlyle Aviation Partners, we are entitled to 100% of the management fee-related revenues and advisory fee-related revenues of Carlyle Aviation Partners that serve as advisers or service providers of the Carlyle Aviation Partners funds and portfolios of investments. In addition, we will receive 55% of the carried interest from funds managed or advised by Carlyle Aviation Partners, with the remaining 45% being allocated to the prior owners of Carlyle Aviation Partners and certain employees.
    With respect to our arrangements with NGP, we are entitled to an allocation of income equal to 47.5% of the carried interest received by NGP XI and future NGP funds. In addition, we hold an interest in the general partner of the NGP X fund, which entitles us to an allocation of income equal to 40% of the carried interest received by NGP X’s general partner.
    Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to our fund of funds vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15%, or in some cases 40%, of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).
    As noted above, in connection with raising new funds or securing additional investments in existing funds, we negotiate terms for such funds and investments with existing and potential investors. The outcome of such negotiations could result in our agreement to terms that are materially less favorable to us than for prior funds we have advised or funds advised by our competitors. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
Capital Invested in and Alongside Our Investment Funds
    To further align our interests with those of investors in our investment funds, we have invested our own capital and that of our senior Carlyle professionals in and alongside the investment funds we sponsor and advise. Carlyle generally expects to commit to fund approximately 0.75% of the capital commitments to our future Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds, although we may elect to invest additional amounts in funds focused on new investment areas. We also intend to make investments in our Global Investment Solutions carry funds, our open-end funds, our BDCs and other 1940 Act regulated vehicles and our CLO vehicles. In addition, certain qualified Carlyle professionals and other qualified individuals (including certain individuals who may not be employees of the firm but who have pre-existing business relationships with Carlyle or industry expertise in the sector in which a particular investment fund may be investing) are permitted, subject to certain restrictions, to invest alongside the investment funds we sponsor and advise. Fees assessed or profit allocations on such investments by such persons may be eliminated or substantially reduced.
    Minimum general partner capital commitments to our investment funds are determined separately with respect to each investment fund. We may, from time to time, exercise our right to purchase additional interests in our investment funds that become available in the ordinary course of their operations. See Part II. Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information regarding our minimum general partner capital commitments to our funds. Our general partner capital commitments are funded with cash and not with carried interest or through a management fee waiver program.
19


Employees
    We believe that one of the strengths and principal reasons for our success is the quality and dedication of our people. As of December 31, 2022, we employed more than 2,100 individuals, including over 770 investment professionals, located in 29 offices across five continents.
One Carlyle Culture
Our employees around the globe are united by our One Carlyle culture, which is driven by our mission to invest wisely and create value while delivering on our strategic plan to grow, build and perform. We seek to achieve our mission and deliver on our strategic plan by creating a culture where employees (1) strive to excel, (2) deliver for the firm, (3) challenge the status quo and (4) leverage diverse perspectives. We encourage our employees to leave their comfort zone and seek out a leading edge while working with passion, creativity and a relentless determination to deliver for our stakeholders. We seek to foster lateral working relationships across and beyond Carlyle while working as one team to drive long-term value creation. We strive to lead by example in driving and embracing change. We foster diverse perspectives by encouraging our employees to engage with others with candor and diversity of thought, promoting a team conscience that is inclusive and empowering.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We are committed to growing and cultivating an environment that fosters diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) and values the diverse perspectives, backgrounds, experiences and geographies of our employees and other stakeholders. We seek to promote greater diversity among our employees, enhance knowledge and understanding of key DEI issues, reward progress on our DEI goals and foster an environment where our employees and stakeholders feel included and valued for their diverse experiences and perspectives. We strive to embed DEI into everything we do by leveraging our spheres of influence. As we ignite action within Carlyle, our investments, and the business community, we are making strides in DEI in the near term and laying the foundation for even greater impact into the future.
Carlyle. A focus on DEI efforts is embedded into the highest levels of our firm, including our Board of Directors, and is guided by our DEI Council, comprised of members of our executive team, as well as key senior leaders across the globe. We strive to create a workplace culture that enhances our ability to recruit, develop and retain talent from a broad set of backgrounds and experiences and, to this end, we asked all of our employees to set a personal DEI objective beginning in 2021, a practice which we continued in 2022. Inclusive leadership is one of our core leadership competencies, and the DEI Council is involved in reviewing the promotion process for our senior personnel. All of our employees who were nominated for promotion to a Managing Director or Partner role during 2022 were evaluated on their inclusive leadership and management skills. To continue to enhance inclusive decision-making, during 2022 we continued the “Better Decisions” initiative that launched in 2019, which provides education, practical tools and guidance to build awareness of unconscious bias and to mitigate its negative effects. Over 1,500 of our employees have participated in in-person or virtual sessions of this program. In addition to these initiatives, we encourage our employees to engage with and support one another through our global Employee Resource Groups, which include DiverseAbility, LGBTQ+, Multicultural, Veterans, Women, Working Parents and NextGen groups, that were formed to cultivate and retain a diverse, equitable and inclusive workforce.
During 2022, we invested in enhancing DEI through our second year of the DEI Incentive Awards program, pursuant to which we granted approximately $2 million in awards to 70 employees from around the globe who made an impact on DEI at Carlyle by developing our people, attracting and recruiting talent, building an inclusive culture and/or furthering board diversity at our portfolio companies. Award recipients were nominated by their peers, reviewed by group heads and confirmed by the DEI Council. We also launched the DEI Leadership Network, a coalition of portfolio company CEOs around the globe to develop a peer group for shared resources and insights that can help advance DEI within their respective companies.
Business and Community. The communities we touch provide us with an opportunity to drive change. As part of ongoing efforts to elevate DEI within our industry, Carlyle strives to improve diversity and promote an inclusive culture for women and underrepresented professionals within the industry. Carlyle is a founding signatory to the Institutional Limited Partners Association’s Diversity in Action initiative and has joined the Milken Institute as a strategic partner and first underwriter for the DEI in Asset Management Program, which was created to improve recruitment, retention and advancement for women and persons who are Black, Indigenous and People of Color within the asset management industry. In addition, we have received a perfect score for five consecutive years on the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index, which recognizes corporate efforts to support LGBTQ+ employees. Carlyle is also a member of the 30% Coalition, which works to achieve diversity in senior leadership and the corporate boardroom. Moreover, we have partnerships with organizations such as the 10,000 Black Interns Programme in the UK, Level 20, Out for Undergrad and the Diversity & Inclusion in Asia Network.

Employee Engagement

We routinely evaluate, modify, and enhance our internal processes and technologies to increase employee engagement, productivity and efficiency. During 2020, we introduced a robust feedback training and communication campaign to deliver
20


real-time feedback, as well as more frequent formal performance conversations and launched a new, more streamlined performance management system, which we continued into 2022. In order to measure employee engagement, we conduct an annual engagement survey as well as other pulse surveys throughout the year. We have continued to focus on the satisfaction and wellness of our employees over the past year, and we plan to continue to use annual and pulse surveys to evaluate our performance and guide our decision-making.

We are also continuing to expand our employee training programs, including those focused on enhancing management and leadership capability at all levels of the firm. These programs include the Future Leaders Academy for new Managing Directors, the Career Strategies Initiative for Vice President and Principal-level underrepresented professionals, which is a virtual sponsorship program for underrepresented professionals, the Leadership Principles program for Principals and Directors, the Better Leaders Program for Vice Presidents and Associate Directors and the Better Managers Program for Senior Associates, Associate Vice Presidents, Managers and Associates. We also continue to support a global mentoring program. In 2022, we launched MentorcliQ, a user-friendly platform that offers a personalized experience for mentees and mentors. We also conducted in-person analyst and associate training in August 2022 for our largest ever class of investment professionals.
Compensation and Benefits
We believe that equitable compensation and incentive programs are critical to hiring and retaining highly qualified people. We seek to provide a pay and benefits package that is competitive within the local marketplace for our industry to reward and retain our employees and attract and retain talent. Compensation comprises a base salary for salaried employees and compensation per hour for hourly employees in connection with satisfying the daily expectations of their roles. Our annual discretionary performance-based cash bonus program is a significant component of our compensation program and rewards employees based on firm, segment, investment fund, department and individual performance to directly align our employees with our financial performance and strategic goals. To further align the interests of our employees with our stockholders and to cultivate a strong sense of ownership and commitment to our firm, certain employees also are eligible to receive awards of restricted stock units and/or participate in our other long-term incentive programs.
The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our people. We are committed to their health, safety and wellness and seek to provide benefits that are locally relevant for our global employees. For example, our U.S. benefits programs include health and welfare benefits (including healthcare, dental benefits and vision benefits, among others), retirement offerings (including employer matching contributions, subject to eligibility requirements), an Employee Assistance Program, family and caregiver-oriented benefits and commuting benefits, among other benefits. In addition, we have various time-off policies for eligible employees for sick leave, vacation leave, personal days, paid holidays and paid parental leave. We also seek to provide strong benefits programs globally in line with local market practices.
Consistent with our guiding principle that building better businesses means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest, we encourage our employees to get involved where they live, work and invest through our volunteer and wealth sharing programs. In 2022, more than 270 Carlyle employees gave over 400 philanthropic gifts, which we matched. These gifts supported over 170 nonprofit organizations globally. Carlyle employees also put their time and expertise to work through volunteer activities across our offices.
Employee Wellness
We believe that a key component to investing in our employees is investing in their wellness. We focus on five pillars of wellbeing for our employees: physical, environmental, emotional, social and financial. During June 2022, we continued our practice that started in September 2021, of hosting a “Wellbeing Month,” where we provide activities and seminars dedicated to each of the wellbeing pillars. Activities during our Wellbeing Month included seminars with external wellness providers and interactive physical activities. Beginning in September 2021, we provided our eligible employees with an annual $750 well-being stipend to use for personal wellness needs, which we continued in 2022. For the second year in a row, we also established a firmwide week-long holiday during August 2022 to provide a coordinated break for our employees.
COVID-19
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been engaged with our employees and adapted to changing circumstances while remaining committed to the health and safety of our employees. During the latter part of 2021, we implemented a hybrid return-to-office approach to reintegrate our employees, including new employees who joined Carlyle during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employees generally work in the office three days per week, depending on business needs, and work remotely for the balance of the week. Our technology infrastructure has facilitated our ability to shift to a hybrid work environment and our employees and leaders have demonstrated their ability to quickly and seamlessly adapt without disruption to our business.

21


Environmental, Social and Governance
We are committed to the principle that building a better business means investing responsibly and engaging in the communities where we work and invest. As a responsible global organization dedicated to driving value by seeking to serve its stakeholders, Carlyle has made it a priority to invest in a framework and the necessary resources for understanding, monitoring and managing ESG risks and opportunities across our portfolio. We believe ESG provides an additional lens to help us assess and mitigate risks, and identify and capitalize on potential opportunities. To implement these principles into our investment process, in 2008, we developed a set of Guidelines for Responsible Investment that consider the environmental, social and governance implications of certain investments we make, which help guide our investment practices. In December 2020, we expanded upon these guidelines through the publication of our comprehensive Environmental, Social and Governance Policy, which outlines our approach to ESG integration, and our resourcing, scope and investment application, and which has now replaced our Guidelines for Responsible Investment.
We continuously have sought to strengthen our governance, resourcing, reporting and transparency on ESG matters. In 2010, we became one of the first major private equity firms to publish an ESG report and in 2014, we hired our first dedicated ESG professional. Since then, we have continued to expand our team of dedicated ESG professionals. In 2020, we further strengthened our policies and practices around evaluating new investments for ESG implications, establishing a senior ESG review committee to evaluate more complex ESG issues, in order to help guide our investment analysis. Also in 2020, we published our inaugural Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Report, underscoring our evolving approach to climate change and we published our first corporate ESG disclosures, utilizing Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, which provide an internationally recognized framework to communicate ESG matters to our various stakeholders. In 2022, we became a signatory of the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, and remain involved with several important industry initiatives in the field, including, among others, the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, the International Sustainability Standards Board Investor Advisory Group (IIAG), the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) Global Responsible Investment Steering Committee, and the One Planet Private Equity Funds Initiative.

Our Board of Directors oversees our firm’s approach to ESG given the critical importance with which we view ESG principles. The Board receives regular updates on our ESG strategy and certain investment implications, and receives information on thematic topics, such as our approach to climate risk and opportunity and DEI. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, which takes a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance, including our ESG and Impact strategy, has appointed a member of the Board to serve as the ESG and Impact lead, responsible for oversight of the firm’s work in this area. In addition, Carlyle’s Global Head of Impact is directly responsible for our climate strategy, and reports to the firm’s Chief Operating Officer.
With respect to our investments, we may track certain ESG key performance indicators (KPIs) that we consider relevant across diverse geographies and assets for our corporate private equity and natural resources investments, including climate-related metrics. For some of our larger strategies, we generally work with qualifying portfolio companies on collecting more tailored ESG KPIs and climate-related data such as carbon footprints.
Carlyle has an internal dedicated ESG team with a breadth of experience to help identify critical ESG matters in our investment processes, as well as a network of outside experts to enable our investment teams to selectively go deeper on important ESG factors and potential ESG growth opportunities for a given investment over our projected investment periods. We believe our commitment to ESG may strengthen strategy, bring new ideas for operational efficiency and help unlock value for certain portfolio companies.
Since Carlyle was established, we have recognized the value and benefits of maintaining a business model grounded in investment fundamentals, strong governance and transparency. We are committed to maintaining strong internal corporate governance processes and fiduciary functions and are subject to regulatory supervision. Carlyle professionals receive regular and targeted training on many issues related to corporate governance and compliance, such as anti-corruption, conflicts of interest, economic sanctions and anti-money laundering. Our policy requires all employees to annually certify their understanding of and compliance with key global Carlyle policies and procedures.
Global Information Technology and Solutions
    Global Information Technology and Solutions, which we refer to as GTS, is essential for Carlyle to conduct investment activities, manage internal administration activities and connect our global enterprise. As part of our GTS strategy and governance processes, we develop and routinely refine our technology architecture to leverage solutions that will best serve the needs of our investors. Our systems, data, network and infrastructure are continuously monitored and administered by formal controls and risk management processes that help protect the data and privacy of our employees and investors. Our business continuity plans are designed to allow all critical business functions to continue in an orderly manner in the event of an emergency. Our GTS team works closely with our business segment teams to maintain operational resilience through business continuity planning and annual IT disaster recovery testing, which collectively support the goal of mitigating risk were an emergency to occur.
22


Our Information Security Steering Committee, chaired by our Chief Information Security Officer, monitors threats and prioritizes the initiatives of our information security program. We also seek to educate our employees on how to safeguard Carlyle’s information assets through quarterly security awareness training focused on cyber risks and simulated phishing exercises that provide insight into the effectiveness of our security training.
Competition
    As a global investment firm, we compete with a broad array of regional and global investment firms, as well as global banking institutions and other types of financial institutions and markets, for employees, investors and investment opportunities. Generally, our competition varies across business lines, geographies, distribution channels and financial markets. We believe that our competition for investors is based primarily on investment performance, business relationships, the quality of services provided to investors, reputation and brand recognition, pricing, market sentiment and the relative attractiveness of the particular opportunity in which a particular fund intends to invest. To stay competitive, we believe it is also important to be able to offer fund investors a customized suite of investment products that enable them to tailor their investments across the product offerings in our three global business segments. As we continue to target high net worth investors, we also face competition for these investors from mutual funds and investment firms that have competing retail products. We believe that competition for investment opportunities varies across business lines, but is generally based on industry expertise and potential for value-add, pricing, terms and the structure of a proposed investment and certainty of execution.
    We generally compete with sponsors of public and private investment funds across all of our segments. In addition to these traditional competitors, we increasingly have faced competition from local and regional firms, insurance and reinsurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, family offices and agencies and instrumentalities of governments in the various countries in which we invest. This trend has been especially apparent in emerging markets, where local firms tend to have more established relationships with the companies in which we are attempting to invest. Large institutional investors and sovereign wealth funds increasingly have begun to develop their own in-house investment capabilities and may compete against us for investment opportunities and greater reliance on advisory firms or in-house investment management may reduce fund of funds’ appeal to large institutional investors.
Within our GPE segment, our main competitors for investment opportunities are generally other private equity sponsors, sovereign wealth funds and operating companies acting as strategic acquirers, as well as real estate development companies and other infrastructure investment business. In our Global Credit segment, our main competitors are private credit strategies, business development companies, distressed debt funds, mezzanine funds, lessors of commercial aircraft, infrastructure lenders and other CLO issuers. In our Global Investment Solutions segment, our main competitors are other fund of funds managers and/or with advisers that are turning their business models towards discretionary investment advisory services. As larger sovereign wealth funds and pension funds pursue direct commitments and secondary transactions, our Global Investment Solutions funds may face increased competition for investments and coinvestment opportunities.

    Some of the entities that we compete with are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do. Many of our competitors also have recently raised, or are expected to raise, significant amounts of capital and many of them have investment objectives similar to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities and investor capital. Some of these competitors may also have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for us when sourcing investment opportunities. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds, which could allow them to consider a wider range of investments and to bid more aggressively than us for investments. Strategic buyers may also be able to achieve synergistic cost savings or revenue enhancements with respect to a targeted portfolio company, which we may not be able to achieve through our own portfolio, and this may provide them with a competitive advantage in bidding for such investments.

Regulatory and Compliance Matters
United States
    Our businesses, as well as the financial services industry generally, are subject to extensive regulation in the United States and elsewhere. In general, the SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and other regulators around the globe have in recent years significantly increased their regulatory activities with respect to global investment firms.
    Certain of our subsidiaries are registered as investment advisers with the SEC. Registered investment advisers are subject to the requirements and regulations of the Advisers Act. Such requirements relate to, among other things, fiduciary duties to advisory clients, maintaining an effective compliance program, solicitation agreements, conflicts of interest, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on agency cross and principal transactions between an adviser and advisory clients and general anti-fraud prohibitions. In addition, our registered investment advisers are subject to routine periodic and other examinations by the SEC staff. In accordance with our efforts to enhance our compliance program and in response to recommendations received from the SEC in the course of routine examinations, certain additional
23


policies and procedures have been put into place, but no material changes to our registered investment advisers’ operations have been made as a result of such examinations. Our registered investment advisers also have not been subject to any regulatory or disciplinary actions by the SEC. Finally, certain of our investment advisers are subject to limited SEC disclosure requirements as “exempt reporting advisers.”
Effective January 3, 2022, Carlyle’s two affiliated broker-dealer entities, TCG Securities, L.L.C. (“TCG Securities”) and TCG Capital Markets L.L.C. (“TCG Capital Markets”), restructured and now operate as TCG Capital Markets. TCG Capital Markets is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and in 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). In addition, TCG Capital Markets operates under an international dealer exemption in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan. TCG Capital Markets may act as an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent in securities offerings and TCG Senior Funding L.L.C. may act as an underwriter, originator, syndicator or placement agent for loan originations. TCG Capital Markets also conducts U.S.-based marketing and fundraising activities for our Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Global Investment Solutions business lines, and houses our anti-money laundering compliance function. TCG Capital Markets acts as a placement agent, on a best-efforts basis, for interests in private funds and other investment vehicles for such business lines.
    Registered broker-dealers are subject to routine periodic and other examinations by the staff of FINRA. No material changes to our broker-dealer operations have been made as a result of such examinations.
    Broker-dealers are subject to rules relating to transactions on a particular exchange and/or market, and rules relating to the internal operations of the firms and their dealings with customers including, but not limited to, the form or organization of the firm, qualifications of associated persons, officers and directors, net capital and customer protection rules, books and records and financial statements and reporting. In particular, as a result of its registered status, TCG Capital Markets is subject to the SEC’s uniform net capital rule, Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which specifies both the minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must maintain relative to the scope of its business activities and net capital liquidity parameters. The SEC and FINRA require compliance with key financial responsibility rules, including maintenance of adequate funds to meet expenses and contractual obligations, as well as early warning rules that compel notice to the regulators via accelerated financial reporting anytime a firm’s capital falls below the minimum required level. The uniform net capital rule limits the amount of qualifying subordinated debt that is treated as equity to a specific percentage under the debt-to-equity ratio test, and further limits the withdrawal of equity capital, which is subject to specific notice provisions. Finally, compliance with net capital rules may also limit a firm’s ability to expand its operations, particularly to those activities that require the use of capital. Violation of the net capital rule may result in censures, fines, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, revocation of licenses or registrations, the suspension or expulsion from the securities industry of the broker-dealer or its officers or employees or other similar consequences by regulatory bodies. To date, TCG Capital Markets has not had any capital adequacy issues and is currently capitalized in excess of the minimum maintenance amount required by regulators.
    Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (“CGCIM”) and CSL III Advisor, LLC, subsidiaries of Carlyle, serve as investment advisers to certain closed-end investment companies that have elected to be regulated as BDCs under the Investment Company Act (as well as to certain private funds and other clients). Accordingly, these BDCs are subject to all relevant provisions under the Investment Company Act as registered investment companies. In addition, CGCIM serves as the investment adviser to the Interval Fund, which is regulated as a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act. Moreover, AlpInvest Private Equity Investment Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Carlyle, serves as the investment adviser to Carlyle AlpInvest Private Markets Fund (“CAPM”), which is regulated as a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act. CGCIM also serves as a sub-adviser to CAPM.
United Kingdom and the European Union
    Similar to the United States, jurisdictions outside the United States in which we operate, in particular Europe, have become subject to an expanding body of regulation, some of which is complex and prescriptive. Governmental regulators and other authorities in Europe have proposed or implemented a number of initiatives and additional rules and regulations that could adversely affect our business. These include rules and regulations in the United Kingdom (“UK”) that are applicable to our subsidiaries established in the UK, as well as, or in addition to, rules and regulations implemented under European Union (“EU”) directives or regulations, which generally have application throughout the European Economic Area (“EEA”) but may also have substantive differences among EU countries as they are implemented pursuant to each member state’s legislative process.
    In the UK, the principal legislation regulating financial services is the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”) and the principal European legislation affecting the conduct of our business in the EU is implemented under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”) and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”), although there are a number of other pieces of legislation both in the UK and the EU that affect our business, such as the
24


General Data Protection Regulation (and its UK equivalent). The FSMA rules and EU laws that have either been adopted into UK law in connection with the UK’s withdrawal from the EU (e.g., the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation) or already implemented in the UK through domestic legislation or regulatory rules prior to such withdrawal (e.g., MiFID and AIFMD), comprehensively regulate the provision of most aspects of our asset management and advisory business in the UK, including sales, research and trading practices, provision of investment advice, corporate finance, dealing, use and safekeeping of client funds and securities, record keeping, margin practices and procedures, approval standards for individuals, anti-money laundering, periodic reporting, settlement procedures, securitization, derivative trading, prudential capital requirements, data protection, sustainable finance, and interest rate benchmarks. Legislation not yet in effect and future legislative initiatives will impact our business. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.”
    CECP Advisors LLP (“CECP”), one of our subsidiaries in the UK, is authorized under the FSMA and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”). CECP has permission to undertake certain corporate finance activities in the UK—broadly these are advising on, and arranging deals in relation to certain types of, investments. CECP is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.
    CELF Advisors LLP (“CELF”), another one of our subsidiaries in the UK, is also authorized and regulated by the FCA, but has permission to undertake a broader range of regulated activities than CECP, namely, arranging deals in investments, advising on investments, managing investments, dealing in investments as agent, and arranging for the safeguarding and administration of assets. CELF is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.

In 2022, we acquired Abingworth LLP (“Abingworth”), which is authorized and regulated by the FCA, with permissions for establishing, operating or winding up a collective investment scheme, and managing an unauthorized AIF. Abingworth is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.
Also in 2022, CECP appointed CIC Advisors LLP (“CIC”) as an appointed representative. Under the arrangement, CECP, as the principal of CIC, has accepted regulatory responsibility for CIC of carrying out the activities of advising on investments and arranging deals in investments. Under the appointed representative arrangement, CIC is only permitted to carry out these activities in relation to eligible counterparties and professional clients.

Following the UK’s exit from the EU on January 31, 2020, and the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020, EEA passporting rights (which previously entitled CECP and CELF to provide certain investment services in or into the EEA on a cross-border basis and Abingworth to market its funds in the EEA on a cross-border basis) are no longer available to CECP, CELF and Abingworth. Certain EEA investor-facing activities previously carried on by those firms have been reorganized such that they are now performed by different, EEA-established, affiliates under alternative licensing arrangements, and this may continue to change in the future. These arrangements may subject us to additional regulatory obligations and may impede our ability to raise capital from EEA investors. The UK and the EU announced, on December 24, 2020, that they have reached agreement on a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement (the “TCA”), which addresses the future relationship between the parties. The TCA was approved by the UK Parliament on December 30, 2020. Due to the TCA only being agreed shortly before the end of the transition period, it applied on a provisional basis in the EU until it was formally ratified by the European Parliament and has applied permanently from May 1, 2021. However, the TCA does not substantively address future cooperation in the financial services sector or reciprocal market access into the EU by UK-based firms under equivalence arrangements or otherwise. Nevertheless, as a new agreement, the implications and operations of the TCA may be subject to change and/or develop on short notice. In addition, the Temporary Marketing Permission Regime (the “TMPR”) allows AIFMs to continue to market in the UK those funds that were in existence on December 31, 2020, on broadly the same terms as previously applied. Unless extended, the TMPR expires on December 31, 2023. Any marketing of a new fund coming into existence after December 31, 2020, must be under the UK’s national private placement regime.

Certain of our European subsidiaries are subject to compliance requirements in connection with AIFMD, which regulates alternative investment fund managers (“AIFMs”) established in the EEA that manage alternative investment funds (“AIFs”). In the UK, a retained version of the AIFMD exists. The AIFMD also regulates and imposes regulatory obligations in respect of the marketing in the EEA by AIFMs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere) of AIFs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere). The AIFMD generally became effective in countries across the EEA in 2014. Currently, Carlyle has three authorized AIFMs in the EEA: AlpInvest, CIM Europe S.a.r.l. (“CIM Europe”) and Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. In the UK, Abingworth is authorized under the UK retained version of AIFMD.
    The AIFMD imposes significant regulatory requirements on AIFMs. The AIFMD regulates fund managers by, among other things, prescribing authorization conditions for an AIFM, restricting the activities that can be undertaken by an AIFM, prescribing the organizational requirements, operating conditions, and regulatory standards relating to such things as initial capital, remuneration, conflicts, risk management, leverage, liquidity management, delegation of duties, transparency and
25


reporting requirements. The AIFMD has the potential to restrict Carlyle’s fund marketing strategy and places additional compliance obligations on its authorized AIFMs in the form of, among other things, remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements, leverage oversight and liquidity management.
    Authorized AIFMs are entitled to market their AIFs throughout the EEA under a marketing passport. Under the AIFMD, an AIFM may, in addition to its fund management activity, also be authorized to provide certain investment services that would otherwise require authorization under MiFID. Authorization under the AIFMD is currently available only to EEA fund managers. AlpInvest obtained authorization as an AIFM from the Authority for Financial Markets in the Netherlands (the “AFM”) in 2015. AlpInvest is also licensed by the AFM to provide some of the additional investment services that are otherwise generally reserved to MiFID firms. CIM Europe obtained authorization as an AIFM in Luxembourg in early 2018. Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. registered at the Bank of Italy’s AIFM register under no.127 in 2017.
    The AIFMD allows member states to permit marketing within their member state by non-EEA fund managers (under what are known as national private placement regimes), provided the local law imposes certain minimum requirements. Member states may impose more stringent requirements. At present, some EEA states have chosen not to operate a national private placement regime at all; some EEA states apply the minimum requirements; others require the minimum plus a few additional requirements (e.g., the appointment of a depository); and some require compliance with substantially all of the AIFMD. Certain of Carlyle’s funds are currently offered in selected member states of the EEA in accordance with the national private placement regimes of the relevant EEA jurisdiction.
In 2017, the European Commission started a review of AIFMD. The European Commission published a report on the operation of the AIFMD in January 2019, which identified certain areas requiring further analysis. A subsequent report on the application and scope of the AIFMD was published in June 2020. Following these reports, the European Commission launched a public consultation relating to its review of the AIFMD in October 2020, which closed on January 29, 2021. In November 2021, the European Commission published draft legislation, commonly referred to as “AIFMD II.” The European Commission’s draft legislation proposed a number of amendments to the AIFMD, including more onerous delegation requirements, enhanced substance requirements, additional liquidity management provisions for AIFMs to the extent that they manage open-ended AIFs, and revised regulatory reporting and investor disclosures requirements. The draft proposed significant new requirements relating to the activities of funds that originate loans including new restrictions on the structure that such funds may take. In addition, the draft proposed to introduce new conditions for non-EEA AIFMs, such as certain of our US affiliates, to be able to make use of the national private placement regimes of EEA states, including a condition that the jurisdiction of neither of the AIFM and AIF have been identified as non-cooperative third countries for tax purposes nor deemed by the EU not to comply fully with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and thereby to ensure an effective exchange of information in tax matters. This gives rise to a risk that certain of our AIFs may not be able to take advantage of such regimes to raise capital from EEA investors, potentially with little notice. AIFMD II is currently passing through the EU ordinary legislative process, involving scrutiny and amendment by the European Council and the European Parliament. Agreement on the legislation between the European Commission, European Council and European Parliament is expected to be reached during 2023, after which the final shape of the new regime, and any impact on us or our subsidiaries, will be clearer. The new regime will come into force two years after this final agreement is reached and fully approved with implementation currently expected in 2025.
In August 2021, Directive (EU) 2019/1160 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1156 (the “Cross-Border Marketing Rules”) came into force in the EU. The Cross-Border Marketing Rules were introduced to streamline certain aspects of marketing investment funds by harmonizing the ability for EU AIFMs to distribute AIFs across the EU, including by introducing a new regime for “pre-marketing.” Moreover, these regulations also impose new restrictions and new obligations on fund managers that are pre-marketing their funds in the EU. Further, some EU member states (but not all) also apply, or intend to apply, certain of the Cross-Border Marketing Rules to non-EU fund managers (including UK and U.S. fund managers) in relation to the process of marketing of their funds. Accordingly, our ability to market our funds in EU will vary from country to country notwithstanding this pan-EU regulation.
    As outlined above, certain of our European subsidiaries, notably CECP, CELF and CIC in the UK, must comply with the regulatory framework established by MiFID (including as retained in the UK), which regulates the provision and conduct of investment services and activities throughout the EEA. Certain aspects of MiFID also apply to AlpInvest by virtue of its MiFID “top up” permission as part of its AIFMD authorization. MiFID prescribes detailed requirements governing the organization and business conduct of investment firms, regulated markets and certain other entities such as credit institutions to the extent they perform investment services or activities.
The latest iteration of MiFID, Directive 2014/ 65/EU (“MiFID II”) together with the accompanying Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 (the “Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation” or “MiFIR”), extended the MiFID requirements in a number of areas and require investment firms to comply with more prescriptive and onerous obligations in relation to such things as: costs and charges disclosure, product design and governance, the receipt and payment of inducements, the receipt of and payment for investment research, suitability and appropriateness assessments, conflicts of interest, record-keeping, best
26


execution, transaction and trade reporting, remuneration, training and competence and corporate governance. Failure to comply with MiFID II and its associated legislative acts could result in sanctions from national regulators, the loss of market access and a number of other adverse consequences which would have a detrimental impact on our business. Although the UK has now withdrawn from the EU, its rules implementing MiFID continue to have effect and MiFIR has been adopted into UK law (subject to certain amendments to ensure it operates properly in a UK-specific context) in connection with this withdrawal.
The UK has introduced a new prudential regulatory framework for UK investment firms (the “Investment Firm Prudential Regime” or the “IFPR”), which is closely based on an equivalent regulatory framework introduced at the EU-level through the EU Investment Firm Regulation and Investment Firm Directive (together “IFR/IFD”). The IFPR took effect from January 1, 2022, and applies to our subsidiaries that are UK investment firms under MiFID II, namely CECP and CELF. Under the IFPR, among other requirements, both CECP and CELF are required to maintain a more onerous policy on remuneration, set an appropriate ratio between the variable and fixed components of total remuneration and meet requirements on the structure of variable remuneration. These requirements may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain staff. Importantly, the broad discretion for UK firms that used to be available to disapply certain remuneration rules on the basis of “proportionality” does not apply in relation to IFPR. Under IFPR, CECP and CELF will each also have to make public disclosure on their websites in relation to their (i) own funds, own funds requirements and governance structures; (ii) risk management; and (iii) remuneration. The new public disclosure requirements mandate more detail including quantitative information on remuneration paid to staff. IFPR has resulted in increased regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements for CECP in particular and may continue to increase the costs of doing business and may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.

In the EU, IFR/IFD took effect from June 26, 2021 and represents a complete overhaul of “prudential” regulation in the EU and substantially increases regulatory capital requirements for certain investment firms and imposes more onerous remuneration rules, and revised and extended internal governance, disclosure, reporting, liquidity, and group “prudential” consolidation requirements (among other things). IFR/IFD affects AlpInvest, one of our subsidiaries, since it is an AIFM in the Netherlands with top-up permissions to provide investment services. In particular, as AlpInvest’s assets under management attributable to separate accounts regulated by MiFID II (as defined below) increases so will AlpInvest’s regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements, which may increase the costs of doing business and may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.
The UK is introducing an important and substantial regime, the “Consumer Duty,” designed to improve outcomes for retail investors, aspects of which will begin to apply from July 31, 2023. Although Carlyle entities do not generally deal with consumers in the ordinary sense, the regime may potentially apply to certain of our future funds. On December 2, 2022, the FCA published a consultation proposal that would, if implemented, remove an important exemption that is currently available to asset managers of investment funds and potentially make the impact of the Consumer Duty more significant and widespread. This could have important implications for Carlyle entities if they are unable to rely on another exemption. We will continue to work closely with external counsel and advisors to monitor these developments.
Other Jurisdictions
    Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to registration and compliance with laws and regulations of non-U.S. governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to, among other things, investment advisory services and the marketing of investment products, and any failure to comply with these regulations could expose us to liability and/or damage our reputation. Certain of our private funds are also required to comply with the trading and disclosure rules and regulations of non-U.S. securities regulators.
    The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has developed Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”) rules for the automatic exchange of FATCA-like financial account information amongst OECD member states. Like FATCA, CRS imposes certain due diligence, documentation and reporting requirements on various Carlyle entities. While CRS does not contain a potential withholding requirement, non-compliance could subject Carlyle to certain reputational harm and potential financial penalties.
    Carlyle Hong Kong Equity Management Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity in respect of professional investors.
Carlyle Asia Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 4 (advising on securities) regulated activities in respect of professional investors.
Carlyle Global Credit (HK) Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to carry on Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 4 (advising on securities) regulated activities in respect of professional investors.
    Carlyle Mauritius Investment Advisor Limited and Carlyle Mauritius CIS Investment Management Limited are licensed providers of investment management services in the Republic of Mauritius and are subject to applicable Mauritian
27


securities laws and the oversight of the Financial Services Commission. Carlyle Mauritius Investment Advisor Limited holds a “Foreign Institutional Investor” license from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which entitles this entity to engage in limited activities in India. Carlyle Mauritius CIS Investment Management Limited holds a “Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor” license from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, which entitles this entity to invest in certain permitted financial instruments (including equity) and derivatives traded or listed on exchanges in the Peoples Republic of China.
    Carlyle Australia Equity Management Pty Limited is licensed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission as an Australian financial services licensee and is authorized to carry on a financial services business to provide advice on and deal in financial products (managed investment schemes and securities) for wholesale clients.
    Carlyle Japan Equity Management L.L.C. (“CJEM”) is registered with the Financial Services Agency of Japan to carry out Type II Financial Instruments Business as a Japanese Type II Financial Instruments Business Operator and it is also a member of the T2FIFA, a self-regulatory organization in Japan. Pursuant to this registration, CJEM is permitted to perform marketing activities to and private placements for specified investors with respect to interests in a limited partnership.
    Carlyle MENA Investment Advisors Limited, a company limited by shares in the Dubai Financial Centre, holds a Category 3C license issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority and is authorized to arrange credit or deal in investments, advise on financial products or credit and manage collective investment funds.

Carlyle MENA Advisors Limited, a company limited by shares in the Abu Dhabi Global Market, is authorized by the Abu Dhabi Financial Services Regulatory Authority and is authorized to arrange deals in investments, advise on investments or credit and manage collective investment funds.
    Carlyle Singapore Investment Advisors Pte Limited holds a capital markets license and an exempt financial adviser status with the Monetary Authority of Singapore to carry on fund management and dealing in regulated capital market products activities in respect of institutional and accredited investors. In addition, we expect AlpInvest Partners Pte Limited to receive a similar license and status with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
    Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A. holds an authorization from the Bank of Italy to carry on AIFMD-compliant fund management and real estate activities. It is registered at the Bank of Italy’s AIFM register under no.127.
    Carlyle Investments (Canada) Corporation, formerly Diversified Global Asset Management Corporation, holds an exempt market dealer license with Ontario Securities Commission to facilitate certain Carlyle fund marketing activities in Canada.
    AlpInvest is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment management company with the Financial Supervisory Service of South Korea.
Carlyle CLO Management LLC is registered as a cross-border discretionary investment management company with the Financial Supervisory Service of South Korea.
    An investment fund advised by us holds an indirect controlling interest in Fortitude Re, a Bermuda company registered as a Class 4 and Class E insurer. Fortitude Re is subject to regulation and supervision by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA”) and compliance with all applicable Bermuda law and Bermuda insurance statutes and regulations, including but not limited to the Insurance Act of 1978 (Bermuda) and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Bermuda Insurance Act”). In addition, as a result of ownership of Fortitude by our investment fund, certain Carlyle affiliates that serve as general partner and investment advisor to the fund are subject to certain insurance laws and regulations in Bermuda as a “controller” of Fortitude Re under the Bermuda Insurance Act. These laws and regulations include certain notice requirements for any person that has become, or as a result of a disposition ceased to be, a shareholder controller of a registered insurer, and failure to comply with such requirements is an offense punishable by law.
    In addition, we and/or our affiliates and subsidiaries may become subject to additional regulatory demands in the future to the extent we expand our investment advisory business in existing and new jurisdictions. There are also a number of pending or recently enacted legislative and regulatory initiatives in the United States and around the world that could significantly impact our business. See Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties,” “Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business” and “Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.���
    Our businesses have operated for many years within a framework that requires our being able to monitor and comply with a broad range of legal and regulatory developments that affect our activities and we take our obligation to comply with all
28


such laws, regulations and internal policies seriously. Our reputation depends on the integrity and business judgment of our employees and we strive to maintain a culture of compliance throughout the firm. We have developed, and adhere to, compliance policies and procedures such as codes of conduct, compliance systems, education and communication of compliance matters. These policies focus on matters such as insider trading, anti-corruption, document retention, conflicts of interest, anti-money laundering and other matters. Our legal and compliance team monitors our compliance with all of the legal and regulatory requirements to which we are subject and manages our compliance policies and procedures. Our legal and compliance team also monitors the information barriers that we maintain to restrict the flow of confidential information, including material, nonpublic information, across our business. Our enterprise risk management function analyzes our operations and investment strategies to identify key risks facing the firm and works closely with the legal and compliance team to address them. The firm also has an independent and objective internal audit department that employs a risk-based audit approach that focuses on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, enterprise risk management functions and other areas of perceived risk and aims to give management and our Board of Directors reasonable assurance that our risks are well-managed and controls are appropriate and effective.
Website and Availability of SEC Filings
Our website address is www.carlyle.com. We make available free of charge on our website or provide a link on our website to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. To access these filings, go to the “SEC Documents” portion of our “Shareholders” page on our website. You may also access the reports and other documents we file with the SEC at a website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.

We use our website (www.carlyle.com), our corporate Facebook page (www.facebook.com/onecarlyle), our corporate Twitter account (@OneCarlyle or www.twitter.com/onecarlyle), our corporate Instagram account (@onecarlyle or www.instagram.com/onecarlyle), our corporate LinkedIn account (www.linkedin.com/company/the-carlyle-group), our corporate YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/user/onecarlyle), and our corporate WeChat account (ID: gh_3e34f090ec20) as channels of distribution of material company information. For example, financial and other material information regarding our company is routinely posted on and accessible at www.carlyle.com. Accordingly, investors should monitor these channels, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information about Carlyle when you enroll your email address by visiting the “Email Alerts” section at http://ir.carlyle.com/email-alerts. The contents of our website and social media channels are not, however, a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are not incorporated by reference herein.
The Carlyle Group Inc. was formed in Delaware as a partnership on July 18, 2011, and converted to a corporation on January 1, 2020. Our principal executive offices are located at 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20004-2505.
ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Company
Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively impact our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise capital, any of which could materially reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.
Our business and the businesses of the companies in which we invest are materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets, and economic conditions or other events throughout the world that are outside of our control, including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, availability and cost of credit, inflation rates, availability and cost of energy, economic uncertainty, slowdown in global growth, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation and regulations on the financial industry), disease, pandemics or other severe public health events, trade barriers, commodity prices, currency exchange rates and controls, national and international political circumstances (including government shutdowns, wars, terrorist acts or security operations), geopolitical tensions and instability, social unrest, supply chain pressures, and the effects of climate change. Over the last several years, markets have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, significant increases in U.S. interest rates, inflationary pressures, heightened geopolitical tensions (including those between the U.S. and China, China and Taiwan, and between Russia and Ukraine), the imposition of export controls and trade barriers, the imposition of economic and political sanctions (upon specific individuals or companies and country, industry and sector wide restrictions), ongoing trade negotiations with major U.S. trading partners and changes in U.S. tax regulations.
29


In this respect, our investment funds focused on Asia, and portfolio companies within non-Asia investment funds with significant operations or connectivity and reliance on Asia companies, and listed securities or debt instruments of companies or industries, could be impacted by any disruptions to the global supply chain that may result from escalating tensions, disputes or potential conflicts in the region surrounding the Taiwan Strait. The resulting actions taken, the response of the international community and other factors affecting trade with China or political or economic conditions in Taiwan could disrupt the manufacture of multiple business critical products or hardware components, including specifically semiconductors and these events may impact entire sectors and industries regardless of their business proximity to the Taiwan Strait. For example, in the event that such conditions impact suppliers, contract manufacturers, logistics providers, and/or distributors, this could lead to adverse business and trading conditions, including material and long-term increases in the cost of materials, higher shipping and transportation rates, material impact or delays on the delivery of products to and from impacted regions, which could adversely affect the business and operations of portfolio companies within and outside Asia, including their revenues and financial results. These conditions, events, and factors are outside our control and may affect the level and volatility of securities prices and the liquidity and the value of investments, and we may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to them. In the event of a market downturn, each of our businesses could be affected in different ways.
    Over the twelve months ending December 31, 2022, the S&P 500 fell by 19.4%, while the MSCI All Country World Index (MSCI) fell by 19.8%. Global markets struggled in the face of rapidly rising inflation, a sharp and hawkish shift in monetary policy, and geopolitical concerns such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s rolling pandemic-related restrictions. Market losses are concentrated at both ends of the risk spectrum where valuations have been richest. The prices of speculative equities most exposed to interest rate risk—namely, those of companies with cash flows weighted far into the future—were down 40% in 2022; at the same time, low risk investment grade bonds were down 19% as well. In general, higher interest rates have negative implications for (1) fixed rate bond markets and (2) tech and high growth sector assets. In both cases, higher discount rates negatively impact the value of future cash flows. Factors that impact global markets, including inflation, interest rates, regulatory and political environments, can be unpredictable and investor sentiment could change quickly in the future while market volatility could accelerate in the face of negative macro or geopolitical developments. If global markets become unstable, it is possible sellers may readjust their valuations and attractive investment opportunities may become available. On the other hand, the valuations of certain assets we planned to sell in the near future could be negatively impacted, as well as the valuations of our portfolio companies and as a result, our accrued performance revenues.
    Market volatility could adversely affect our fundraising efforts in several ways. Investors often allocate to alternative asset classes (including private equity) based on a target percentage of their overall portfolio. If the value of an investor’s portfolio decreases as a whole, the amount available to allocate to alternative assets (including private equity) could decline. In addition, investors often evaluate the amount of distributions they have received from existing funds when considering commitments to new funds. Investors may also weigh the likely impact of geopolitical tensions, cross-border regulations and other factors such as general market volatility and/or a reduction in distributions to investors when considering their allocations to new investment funds. A decrease in the amount an investor commits to our funds could have an impact on the ultimate size of our funds and amount of management fees we generate.
The availability and cost of financing for significant acquisition and disposition transactions could be impacted if equity and credit markets experience heightened volatility. For example, in the United States, equity market volatility persisted throughout 2022, as relentlessly high inflation readings motivated the U.S. Federal Reserve to aggressively increase short-term interest rates. Over the twelve months ending December 31, 2022, 10-year Treasury yields rose 235 basis points (bps) and high yield credit spreads widened by 265 bps and obtaining financing in both the high yield bond market and the leveraged loan market is currently challenging. If credit markets weaken further in the future, it is possible that we and our investment funds may not be able to consummate significant acquisition and disposition transactions on acceptable terms or at all if we or our funds are unable to finance these types of transactions on attractive terms or if the counterparty to the transaction is unable to secure suitable financing.
Global merger and acquisition volume totaled $3.8 trillion in 2022, a 36% decline from 2021. If there is a continued slowdown in global merger and acquisition activity due to the lack of availability of suitable financing or an increase in risk aversion and uncertainty, this could cause a slowdown in our investment pace, which in turn could have an adverse impact on our ability to generate future performance revenues and to fully invest the available capital in our funds and reduce opportunities to exit and realize value from our fund investments. A slowdown in the deployment of our available capital could impact the management fees we earn on those carry funds and managed accounts that generate fees based on invested (and not committed) capital. A slowdown in the deployment of our available capital could also adversely affect our ability to raise and the timing of raising successor investment funds. In 2022, we invested nearly $35 billion through our carry funds.
30


The current U.S. political environment and the resulting uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S. foreign investment, trade, taxation, economic, environmental and other policies under the current Administration, as well as the impact of geopolitical tension, such as a deterioration in the bilateral relationship between the U.S. and China or a further escalation in conflict between Russia and Ukraine, could lead to disruption, instability and volatility in the global markets, which may also have an impact on our exit opportunities across negatively impacted sectors or geographies. The consequences of previously enacted legislation could also impact our business operations in the future. For example, bipartisan legislation enacted in August 2018 has significantly increased and may continue to significantly increase the number and types of investment transactions that are subject to the jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). Under the final regulations implementing the reform legislation, which became effective in October 2020, CFIUS has the authority to review, and potentially recommend that the President unwind, block or impose conditions on certain non-controlling foreign investments in U.S. businesses that deal in certain ways with “critical technology,” “critical infrastructure” and/or “sensitive personal data” of U.S. citizens (as those terms are defined in the regulations). CFIUS’ expanded jurisdiction may reduce the number of potential buyers of and investors in U.S. companies and, accordingly, may limit the ability of our funds to realize value and/or exit from certain existing and future investments. Our flexibility in structuring or financing certain transactions may likewise be constrained and we are unable to predict whether and to what extent uncertainty surrounding economic and market conditions or adverse conditions or events in particular sectors may cause our performance to suffer. The current Administration may also pursue tax policies seeking to increase the corporate tax rate and further limit the deductibility of interest and compensation, or materially alter the taxation of capital gains, among other things. Such changes could materially increase the taxes imposed on us or our funds’ portfolio companies. See “Risks Related to Taxation—Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments (companies) or fund income.” In addition, negative public sentiment could lead to heightened scrutiny and criticisms of our business and investments.
During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns (which may occur across one or more industries or geographies), our funds’ portfolio companies may experience adverse operating performance, decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. Negative financial results in our funds’ portfolio companies may result in less appreciation across the portfolio and lower returns in our funds. Because our investment funds will generally make a limited number of investments, and such investments generally involve a high degree of risk, negative financial results in a few of an investment fund’s portfolio companies could severely impact the fund’s total returns. This could materially and adversely affect our ability to raise new funds as well as our operating results and cash flow. During such periods of weakness, our funds’ portfolio companies may also have difficulty expanding their businesses and operations or meeting their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including expenses payable to us. In addition, such negative market conditions could potentially result in a portfolio company entering bankruptcy proceedings, or in the case of certain real estate funds, the abandonment or foreclosure of investments, thereby potentially resulting in a complete loss of the fund’s investment in such portfolio company or real assets and a significant negative impact to the fund’s performance and consequently our operating results and cash flow, as well as to our reputation. Negative market conditions could also increase the risk of default with respect to investments held by our funds that have significant debt investments, such as our Global Credit funds. Moreover, as capital markets activity slows, we may experience a corresponding reduction in the capital markets fees we earn through Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance and placement of debt and equity securities.
Finally, during periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, the valuations of the investments in our carry funds could suffer. If we were to realize investments at these lower values we may not achieve investment returns in excess of return hurdles required to realize performance revenues or we may become obligated to repay performance revenues previously received by us. The payment of less or no performance revenues could cause our cash flow from operations to significantly decrease, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity position and the amount of cash we have on hand to conduct our operations and to dividend to our stockholders. The generation of less performance revenues could also impact our leverage ratios and compliance with our term loan covenants. Having less cash on hand could in turn require us to rely on other sources of cash (such as the capital markets, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all) to conduct our operations, which include, for example, funding significant general partner and co-investment commitments to our carry funds. In addition, during adverse economic and market conditions, we might not be able to renew or refinance all or part of our credit facility or find alternate financing on commercially reasonable terms. As a result, our uses of cash may exceed our sources of cash, thereby potentially affecting our liquidity position.


31


The global pandemic of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economies and has impacted, and may continue to impact, our performance and results of operations.
In 2020, the global outbreak of COVID-19 spread to every country and every state in the United States. The World Health Organization designated COVID-19 as a pandemic, and numerous countries, including the United States, declared national emergencies with respect to COVID-19. While vaccines have been approved and deployed, the global impact of the outbreak continues to adversely impact many industries and different geographies continue to be impacted by the effects of public health restrictions in various ways. The International Monetary Fund estimates that aggregate output for advanced economies may have returned to pre-pandemic trend levels in 2022, whereas output for emerging market and developing economies, excluding China, may remain below the pre-pandemic forecast into 2024. The timing and likelihood of achieving widespread global vaccination remains uncertain, and vaccines may be less effective against new variants, potentially leading people to continue to isolate and not participate in the economy at pre-pandemic levels for a prolonged period of time, further delaying the return of the global economy to pre-pandemic levels. Many medical and public health experts believe that COVID-19 could occur for years, such as seasonally in the winter, and even if generally ceasing to be fatal for most people, such reoccurrence could increase the possibility of heightened restrictions in business operations.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been engaged with our employees and adapted to changing circumstances while remaining committed to the health and safety of our employees. During the latter part of 2021, we implemented a hybrid return-to-office approach to reintegrate our employees, including new employees who joined Carlyle during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employees generally work in the office three days per week, depending on business needs, and work remotely for the balance of the week. This hybrid work environment may introduce operational risks, including technology availability and heightened cybersecurity risk. Remote working environments may be less secure and more susceptible to hacking attacks, including phishing and social engineering attempts. In addition, our data security, data privacy, investor reporting and business continuity processes could be impacted by a third party’s inability to perform or by failures of, or attacks on, their information systems and technology. Our accounting and financial reporting systems, processes, and controls could be impacted as a result of these risks.
Moreover, an extended remote work environment could adversely affect our One Carlyle culture. While our employees continue to collaborate across offices and geographies, the informal office interactions that contribute to our culture, including integrating new employees into the firm, are not as prevalent in a remote work environment and may be lessened even in a hybrid environment due to different employees working in the office on different days of the week.
Our use of leverage may expose us to substantial risks.
We use indebtedness as a means to finance our business operations, which exposes us to risks associated with using leverage. We are dependent on financial institutions extending credit to us on reasonable terms to finance our business. In this respect, global markets struggled in 2022 in the face of rapidly rising inflation, a sharp and hawkish shift in monetary policy, and geopolitical concerns such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s rolling pandemic-related restrictions, all or some of which may lead to challenges in the credit market. There is no guarantee that financial institutions will continue to extend credit to us or will renew the existing credit agreements we have with them on as favorable terms or at all, or that we will be able to refinance our outstanding notes or other obligations when they mature. In addition, the incurrence of additional debt in the future could result in downgrades of our existing corporate credit ratings, which could limit the availability of future financing and/or increase our cost of borrowing. As borrowings under our credit facility or any other indebtedness mature, we may be required to refinance them by entering into a new facility or issuing additional debt, which could result in higher borrowing costs, or to issue additional equity, which would dilute existing stockholders. In addition, we could repay them by using cash on hand, cash provided by our continuing operations or cash from the sale of our assets, which could reduce dividends to our stockholders. We could also have difficulty entering into new facilities or issuing debt or equity securities in the future on attractive terms, or at all.
From time to time, we may access the capital markets by issuing debt securities. In 2021, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625% subordinated notes due May 2061. We also have senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1,375 million as of December 31, 2022, as well as a credit agreement that provides a $1.0 billion revolving facility with a final maturity date of April 29, 2027 (see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding our senior and subordinated notes and credit agreements). The credit agreement contains financial and non-financial covenants with which we need to comply to maintain access to this source of liquidity. Non-compliance with any of the financial or non-financial covenants without cure or waiver would constitute an event of default, and an event of default resulting from a breach of certain financial or non-financial covenants could result, at the option of the lenders, in an acceleration of the principal and interest outstanding, and a termination of the credit agreement. In
32


addition, to the extent we incur additional debt relative to our current level of earnings or experience a decrease in our level of earnings, our credit rating could be adversely impacted, which would increase our interest expense under our credit facility. Standard & Poor’s and Fitch both upgraded our credit rating to “A-” with a stable rating outlook in March 2022 and October 2022, respectively.
A significant contraction in the market for debt financing or other adverse change relating to the terms of debt financing, including rapidly increasing interest rates from U.S. Federal Reserve actions and equity requirements and more restrictive covenants, could have a material adverse impact on our business and that of our investment funds and their portfolio companies.
Since January 1, 2022, U.S. banks have not been allowed to issue any new debt tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which will cease to be published at the end of June 2023. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, formally recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. While we have seen an increase in market acceptance of SOFR, there is no guarantee that this trend will continue. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—The replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, such as SOFR, may adversely affect our credit arrangements and our collateralized loan obligation transactions.”
Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable, which makes it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis.
Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable. For example, our cash flow fluctuates because we receive carried interest from our carry funds only when investments are realized and achieve a certain preferred return. We may also experience fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results, including our revenue and net income, due to a number of other factors, including changes in the carrying values and performance of our funds’ investments that can result in significant volatility in the carried interest that we have accrued (or as to which we have reversed prior accruals) from period to period, as well as changes in the amount of distributions, gains, dividends or interest paid in respect of investments in our funds and strategic investments (e.g., our investment in Fortitude), changes in our operating expenses, the degree to which we encounter competition and general economic and market conditions. The valuations of investments made by our funds could also be impacted by geopolitical conflict as well as changes, or anticipated changes, in government policy, including policies related to tax reform, financial services regulation, international trade, immigration, environmental, healthcare, labor, infrastructure and energy. The carrying value of fund investments, particularly the public portion of our carry fund portfolios, may be more variable during times of market volatility. As of December 31, 2022, 6% of our Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry fund portfolio was in public securities. While the strength of our portfolio construction resulted in outperformance relative to the broader market in 2022, rising interest rates and continued margin contraction, coupled with restrictions on the deductibility of interest expense, may negatively impact the performance and valuation of our portfolio investments and companies going forward.
GCM generates capital markets fees in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance and placement of debt and equity securities and loan syndication for our portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent, third-party clients. Capital markets fees generated are typically dependent on transaction frequency and volume, and a slowdown market activity could adversely affect the amount of fees generated by capital markets business. We are seeking to bolster and grow our capital markets business, and associated fee stream, related to the underwriting, issuance, and placement of debt and equity securities and loan syndication for our portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent, third-party clients, which we expect if successful will positively impact capital markets fees over time. We also earn transaction fees in respect of our carry funds that are generally shared with our fund investors. The recognition of these fees can be volatile as they are primarily generated by investment activity within our funds, and therefore are impacted by both the pace and size of our carry fund investments.
Higher fundraising activity may generate incremental expenses and, as new capital commitments may not immediately generate fees until they activate management fees, we could incur fundraising related costs ahead of generating revenues. In addition, a downturn in the equity markets may make it more difficult to exit investments by selling equity securities at a reasonable value. If we were to have a realization event in a particular quarter, that event may have a significant impact on our quarterly results and cash flow for that particular quarter and may not be replicated in subsequent quarters. We cannot predict precisely when, or if, realizations of investments will occur, where a fund will be in its lifecycle when the realizations occur or whether a fund will realize carried interest.
We recognize revenue on investments in our investment funds based on our allocable share of realized and unrealized gains (or losses) reported by such investment funds, and a decline in realized or unrealized gains, or an increase in realized or
33


unrealized losses, would adversely affect our revenue, which could further increase the volatility of our quarterly results and cash flow. Because our carry funds have preferred investor return thresholds that need to be met prior to us receiving any carried interest, declines in, or failures to increase sufficiently the carrying value of, the investment portfolios of a carry fund may delay or eliminate any carried interest distributions paid to us with respect to that fund. This is because the value of the assets in the fund would need to recover to their aggregate cost basis plus the preferred return over time before we would be entitled to receive any carried interest from that fund or vehicle.
The timing and receipt of realized carried interest also varies with the life cycle of our carry funds and there is often a difference between the time we start accruing carried interest for financial reporting purposes and the realization and distribution of such carried interest. However, performance revenues are ultimately realized when an investment is profitably disposed of, certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed, the investment fund’s cumulative net returns are in excess of the preferred return and we have decided to collect carried interest rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. In deciding to realize carried interest we consider such factors as the level of embedded valuation gains, the portion of the fund invested, the portion of the fund returned to limited partner investors, the length of time the fund has been in carry, and other qualitative measures. In most funds, we will initially defer realizing carried interest even when contractually entitled to take it, allowing carried interest to accrue until it is determined that giveback risk is substantially reduced. As a result of this deferral, we are generally entitled to a disproportionate “catch-up” level of profit allocation at some point during the harvesting period. In certain circumstances, we may also need to reduce the rate at which we realize carried interest, or temporarily stop realizing carried interest, in order to maintain a sufficient level of reserves and reduce the risk of potential future giveback obligations. In addition to the timing uncertainty of realized carried interest in a single fund, there may also be a generational trough or gap in the realized carried interest of a fund family, as a predecessor fund transitions to its successor fund. In such cases, even when both the predecessor and successor fund have strong performance and earn carried interest, the predecessor fund may substantially exit its investment portfolio before the successor fund is in a sufficient position to begin realizing carried interest. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
Our fee revenue may also depend on the pace of investment activity in our funds. In many of our carry funds, the base management fee may be reduced when the fund has invested substantially all of its capital commitments or the aggregate fair market value of a fund’s investments is below its cost. We may receive a lower management fee from such funds if there has been a decline in value or after the investing period and during the period the fund is harvesting its investments. As a result, the variable pace at which many of our carry funds invest capital and dispose of investments may cause our management fee revenue to vary from one quarter to the next. In addition, certain funds derive management fees only on the basis of invested capital whereby the pace at which we make investments, the length of time we hold such investment and the timing of dispositions will directly impact our revenues.
The investment period of a fund may expire prior to the raising of a successor fund. Where appropriate, we may work with our fund investors to extend the investment period, which gives us the opportunity to invest any capital that remains in the fund. In general, the end of the original investment period (regardless of whether it is extended) will trigger a change in the capital base on which management fees are calculated from committed capital to invested capital. In some cases, a step-down in the applicable rate used to calculate management fees may also occur. In addition, we may raise an investment fund and delay the initiation of fees once a fund is raised to better align our management fee inception date to when we are ready to begin investing the fund. While the total amount of management fees collected over the life of a fund would not be impacted, this could result in a delay in receipt of management fees.
Given our focus on achieving superior investment performance and maintaining and strengthening investor relations, we may reduce our AUM, restrain its growth, reduce our fees or otherwise alter the terms under which we do business when we deem it in the best interest of our investors—even in circumstances where such actions might be contrary to the near-term interests of stockholders.
From time to time if we decide it is in the best interests of stakeholders, we may take actions that could reduce the profits we could otherwise realize in the short term. While we believe that our commitment to treating our investors fairly is in the long-term interest of us and our stockholders, our stockholders should understand we may take actions that could adversely impact our short-term profitability, and there is no guarantee that such actions will benefit us in the long term. The means by which we seek to achieve superior investment performance in each of our strategies could include limiting the AUM in our strategies to an amount that we believe can be invested appropriately in accordance with our investment philosophy and current or anticipated economic and market conditions. In addition, we may seek to exit or end unprofitable or subscale investments, which may reduce our AUM and/or management fees while generally improving our FRE margins. We also may voluntarily
34


reduce management fee rates and terms for certain of our funds or strategies when we deem it appropriate, even when doing so may reduce our short-term revenue. For instance, in order to enhance our relationship with certain fund investors, we have reduced management fees or ceased charging management fees on certain funds in specific instances. In certain investment funds, we have agreed to charge management fees based on invested capital or net asset value as opposed to charging management fees based on committed capital. In certain cases, we have provided “fee holidays” to certain investors during which we do not charge management fees for a fixed period of time. We also may receive requests to reduce management fees on other funds in the future. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
Many of our investment funds utilize subscription lines of credit to fund investments prior to the receipt of capital contributions from the fund’s investors. As capital calls made to a fund’s investors are delayed when using a subscription line of credit, the investment period of such investor capital is shortened, which may increase the net internal rate of return of an investment fund. However, because interest expense and other costs of borrowings under subscription lines of credit are an expense of the investment fund, the investment fund’s net multiple of invested capital will be reduced, as will the amount of carried interest generated by the fund. Any material reduction in the amount of carried interest generated by a fund will adversely affect our revenues. See “Risks Related to our Company—Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively impact our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise capital, any of which could materially reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.”
We may also take other actions, including waiving management fees for a particular investment or fund, that could adversely impact our short-term results of operations when we deem such action appropriate. Furthermore, we typically delay the realization of carried interest to which we are otherwise entitled if we determine (based on a variety of factors, including the stage of the fund’s life cycle and the extent of fund profits accrued to date) that there would be an unacceptably high risk of potential future giveback obligations. Any such delay could result in a deferral of realized carried interest to a subsequent period. See “Risks Related to Our Company—Our revenue, earnings and cash flow are variable, which makes it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis.”
We depend on our senior Carlyle professionals, including our new Chief Executive Officer, and the loss of their services or investor confidence in such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on the efforts, skill, reputations and business contacts of our senior Carlyle professionals, including our executive officers, the members of the investment committees of our investment funds and senior members of our investment teams, the information and deal flow they and others generate during the normal course of their activities and the synergies among the diverse fields of expertise and knowledge held by our professionals.
During 2022, our former Chief Executive Officer, Kewsong Lee, departed from Carlyle. William E. Conway, Jr. served as our interim Chief Executive Officer, in addition to his role as Co-Chairman of the Board, while we searched for a suitable permanent Chief Executive Officer. We recently announced the appointment of Harvey M. Schwartz as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board, effective February 15, 2023. It will take the Chief Executive Officer time to transition into our business and develop a leadership vision. The new Chief Executive Officer may seek changes in our business operations that create uncertainty for our business and investors, including our employees, shareholders and other stakeholders, and there is no guarantee that the Chief Executive Officer will effectively cure any such uncertainties and/or be well received by key stakeholders, despite his strong credentials and the diligence and intentions of the Board’s Search Committee.
Our executive officers and senior Carlyle professionals are not obligated to remain employed with us in their current capacities or at all. To continue to enhance our talent base, we have and will continue to hire and internally develop senior professionals to assume key leadership positions throughout the firm into the future. The availability and efficacy of such future leadership may constitute an adverse risk to our business.
Our senior Carlyle professionals possess substantial experience and expertise and have strong business relationships with investors in our funds and other members of the business community. As a result, the loss of these personnel, including any potential departures or retirements, could jeopardize our relationships with investors in our funds and members of the business community and result in reduction of AUM or fewer investment opportunities. For example, if any of our senior Carlyle professionals were to join or form a competing firm, that action could have a material adverse effect on our business,
35


results of operations and financial condition. Personnel have left the firm in the past and others may do so in the future, and we cannot predict the impact that the departure of any key personnel will have on our ability to achieve our objectives. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, net income and cash flow and could harm our ability to maintain or grow AUM in existing funds or raise additional funds in the future. The governing agreements of many of our investment funds generally require investors in those funds to vote to continue the investment period in the event that certain “key persons” in our investment funds do not provide the specified time commitment to the fund or our firm ceases to control the general partner.
Recruiting and retaining our professionals has become more difficult and may continue to be difficult in the future, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our most important asset is our people, and our continued success is highly dependent upon the efforts of our senior Carlyle professionals and other employees. Our future success and growth depends to a substantial degree on our ability to retain and motivate our senior Carlyle professionals and other employees to strategically recruit, retain and motivate talented personnel, including senior Carlyle professionals. The market for qualified professionals is extremely competitive across levels and areas of expertise, and we may not be successful in our efforts to recruit, retain and motivate these professionals. In connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a shift to a hybrid work model and, in our recruiting efforts, we have seen increased focus by prospective candidates on remote and hybrid work arrangements and arrangements providing more flexibility, including around location. Although we have generally moved to a hybrid work model in which many of our employees are permitted to work remotely for a designated portion of their working time and are expected to come to a Carlyle office for a designated portion of their working time, we continue to see focus on remote work arrangements. If there is a further shift to a longer-term fully remote model that does not require maintaining close proximity to a company’s offices in the markets in which we compete for talent, we may experience an even further increase in competition for talent and it may be difficult to recruit and retain our professionals. We have also experienced upward pressure on compensation packages given the increased competition to hire and retain talented personnel, and we may be required to adjust the amount of cash compensation and types, terms and amounts of equity incentives we provide to our employees, which could have positive or negative effects on the financial metrics commonly used to measure our performance. Even when we offer top-of-market compensation packages, we may not be able to attract and retain all of our desired personnel due to shifting employee priorities. In this respect, in January 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published a proposed rule that, if finally issued, would generally prohibit post-employment non-compete clauses (or other clauses with comparable effect) in agreements between employers and their employees. We are monitoring the proposed rule and the impact it may have on our ability to recruit and retain our professionals.
For our investment professionals, we have historically relied in part on their interests in our investment funds’ carried interest and incentive fees to discourage them from leaving the firm. However, to the extent our investment funds perform poorly, thereby reducing the potential for distributions in respect of carried interest and incentive fees, those interests become less valuable to them and may become a less effective retention tool. There are also factors beyond our control that may affect our efforts to recruit, retain and motivate investment professionals, in particular as they relate to tax considerations regarding carried interest. The tax treatment of carried interest has been an area of focus for policymakers and government officials in recent years. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) enacted in 2017 generally requires that carried interest satisfy a more-than-three-year holding period (as opposed to a more-than-one-year holding period under prior law) to qualify as a long-term capital gain that is taxed at preferential rates for individuals. Congress and the current Administration may consider proposals to treat carried interest as ordinary income rather than as capital gain for tax purposes, to impose a surcharge on carried interest, to further extend the holding period for carried interest to qualify for long-term capital gain treatment, or to increase the capital gains tax rate, each of which could result in a material increase in the amount of taxes that our carry participants would be required to pay. While most proposals regarding the taxation of carried interest require realization of gains before applying ordinary income rates, U.S. federal legislation has previously been introduced that would require holders of carried interest to recognize a specified amount of deemed compensation income each year regardless of whether the investment partnership recognizes income or gain and regardless of whether and when the holders receive distributions in respect of their carried interests. If the tax treatment of carried interest continues to be an area of focus for policymakers and government officials, it could result in further regulatory action by federal, state, or non-U.S. governments. For example, certain states, including New York and California, have previously proposed legislation to levy additional state tax on carried interest. We have seen similar policy discussions in respect of the appropriate treatment of carried interest in many of the international jurisdictions in which we have investment professionals. The additional pressures of fiscal deficits created as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened these risks as international authorities consider ways to increase tax revenues. Such legislative and regulatory changes that modify the tax treatment of carried interest could make it more difficult for us to incentivize, recruit and retain investment professionals, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our
36


investment objectives and thereby reduce the after-tax income and gain related to our business, our distributions to stockholders and the market price of our shares.
We have granted and expect to grant equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan, which has caused dilution. While we evaluate the grant of equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan to employees on an annual basis, the size of the grants, if any, is made at our discretion and may vary significantly from year-to-year, including as the result of special programs or significant senior personnel hirings. If we increase the use of equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan in the future, expenses associated with equity-based compensation may increase materially. In 2022, we incurred equity compensation expenses of $154.0 million in connection with grants of restricted stock units. In February 2023, we granted a total of 9.9 million restricted stock units to our personnel, including certain senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel, which will increase our equity-based compensation expense in the coming years. In addition, following the foregoing grants, taken together with other restricted stock unit grants since the approval of the Equity Incentive Plan in June 2021, there were 2,957,542 remaining shares of common stock available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan. An increase in the number of shares available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan would require shareholder approval. The value of our common stock may drop in value or be volatile, which may make our equity less attractive to our employees since we may not be able to adequately incentivize them.
As of December 31, 2022, our employees held an aggregate of 10.9 million unvested restricted stock units, which vest over various time periods (generally from six months to four years from the date of grant) and/or subject to the achievement of various performance targets. All of the shares of common stock held by our founders are fully vested. In order to recruit and retain existing and future senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel, we may need to increase the level of compensation that we pay to them, which could include grants of significant amounts of restricted stock unit awards or other equity incentive awards under our Equity Incentive Plan. Accordingly, as we promote or hire new senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel over time or attempt to retain the services of certain of our key personnel, we may increase the level of compensation we pay to these individuals, which could cause our total employee compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of our total revenue to increase and adversely affect our profitability. For example, we have had restricted stock unit award programs pursuant to which in 2021 we granted 7.1 million restricted stock units to certain senior Carlyle professionals, the majority of which are eligible to vest based on the achievement of annual performance targets over four years, and in February 2023 we granted 9.9 million restricted stock units to certain senior Carlyle professionals, the majority of which are eligible to vest in installments over a period of three and a half years. These restricted stock unit grants, in addition to our other restricted stock unit grants, will increase our equity-based compensation expense in the coming years, particularly in 2024 when 40% of the performance-based awards granted in 2021 are generally eligible to vest.
We strive to maintain our culture of collaboration and seek to continue to align our interests (and the interests of our employees) with those of our investors. If we do not continue to develop and implement the right processes and tools to maintain our culture, our ability to compete successfully and achieve our business objectives could be impaired, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be successful in expanding into new investment strategies, markets and businesses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our growth strategy focuses on providing resources to foster the development of new product offerings and business strategies by our investment professionals. Given our diverse platform, these initiatives could create conflicts of interests with existing products, increase our costs and expose us to new market risks and legal and regulatory requirements. These products may have different economic structures than our traditional investment funds and may require a different marketing approach. These activities also may impose additional compliance burdens on us, subject us to enhanced regulatory scrutiny and expose us to greater reputation and litigation risk.
The success of our growth strategy will depend on, among other things:
our ability to correctly identify and create products that appeal to our investors;
the diversion of management’s time and attention from our existing businesses;
management’s ability to spend time developing and integrating the new business and the success of the integration effort;
our ability to properly manage conflicts of interests;
37


our ability to identify and manage risks in new lines of businesses;
our ability to implement and maintain adequate investment processes, controls and procedures around our platforms;
our ability to obtain requisite approvals and licenses from the relevant governmental authorities and to comply with applicable laws and regulations without incurring undue costs and delays; and
our ability to successfully negotiate and enter into beneficial arrangements with our counterparties.
In some instances, we may determine that growth in a specific area is best achieved through the acquisition of an existing business or a smaller scale lift out of an investment team to enhance our platform. Our ability to consummate an acquisition will depend on our ability to identify and value potential acquisition opportunities accurately and successfully compete for these businesses against companies that may have greater financial resources. Even if we are able to identify and successfully negotiate and complete an acquisition, these transactions can be complex and we may encounter unexpected difficulties or delays or incur unexpected costs.
In addition to the concerns noted above, each individual acquisition transaction presents unique challenges to ultimately be successful and the success of a firm acquisition will be affected by, among other things:
difficulties and costs associated with the integration of operations and systems;
difficulties integrating the acquired business’s internal controls and procedures into our existing control structure;
difficulties and costs associated with the assimilation of employees; and
the risk that a change in ownership will negatively impact the relationship between an acquiree and the investors in its investment vehicles.
Entry into certain lines of business may subject us to new laws and regulations with which we are not familiar or from which we are currently exempt, and may lead to increased liability, litigation, regulatory risk and expense. If a new business generates insufficient revenue or if we are unable to efficiently manage our expanded operations, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Moreover, if a new product, business or venture developed internally or by acquisition is unsuccessful, we may decide to wind down, liquidate and/or discontinue it. Such actions could negatively impact our relationships with investors in those businesses, could subject us to litigation or regulatory inquiries and can expose us to additional expenses, including impairment charges and potential liability from investor or other complaints.
In August 2022,we acquired Abingworth, a life sciences investment firm, to expand our healthcare investment platform with the addition of nearly $2 billion in assets under management and a specialized team of over 20 investment professionals and advisors. The integration of Abingworth with us, and Carlyle’s corresponding entry into the life sciences industry, may pose some or all of the risks noted above.
Operational risks (including those associated with our business model), system security risks, breaches of data protection, cyberattacks or actions or failure to act by our employees or others with authorized access to our networks, including our ability to insure against such risks, may disrupt our businesses, result in losses or limit our growth.
We rely heavily on our financial, accounting, information, and other data processing systems. We face various security threats on a regular basis, including ongoing cybersecurity threats to and attacks on our information technology infrastructure that are intended to gain access to our proprietary information, destroy data or disable, degrade or sabotage our systems. These security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including known or unknown external third parties and current or former employees and contractors who have or had access to our facilities, systems and information.
38


There has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the security threats we face, with thwarted attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to those that are more advanced and persistent, which may target us because, as a global investment management firm, we hold a significant amount of confidential and sensitive information about our investors, our portfolio companies, potential investments and our employees. As a result, we may face a heightened risk of a security breach, online extortion attempt, or business disruption with respect to this information resulting from an attack by a variety of bad actors, including hacktivists, cyber criminals, foreign governments, cyber extortionists or cyber terrorists. If successful, these types of attacks on our network or other systems could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, due to, among other things, the loss or exposure of investor or proprietary data, the loss or exposure of personal information that we retain, interruptions or delays in our business and damage to our reputation. Our suppliers, contractors, investors, and other third parties with whom we do business also experience cyber threats and attacks that are similar in frequency and sophistication. Supply chain attacks are increasing in frequency and impact on the businesses they affect. We do not have continuous visibility into the security of our supply chain entities and must rely on contractual assurances and the controls and safeguards put in place by our suppliers, contractors, investors and other third parties to defend against, respond to, and report such attacks.
    Those who have or have had authorized access to our networks, including current and former employees and contractors, may introduce vulnerabilities in our systems if they are the target of “phishing,” social engineering, bribery, coercion, or harbor malintent to the Company. We have therefore implemented a security awareness training program. The objective of this program is to inform Carlyle personnel and contractors of their responsibility for information security and includes quarterly online training, live awareness events and phishing simulations. This training is in addition to existing onboarding and annual trainings that discuss cybersecurity issues.
We cannot know the potential impact of future cyber incidents, which vary widely in severity and scale. There can be no assurance that the various procedures and controls we utilize to mitigate these threats will be sufficient to prevent disruptions to our systems, especially because the cyber-attack techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until launched, and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. If any of the controls we put in place do not operate properly or are disabled for any reason or if there is any unauthorized disclosure of data, whether as a result of tampering, a breach of our network security systems, a cyber-incident or attack or otherwise, we could suffer substantial financial loss, increased costs, a disruption of our businesses, liability to our funds and investors, regulatory investigations, intervention, and fines, and reputational damage. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or otherwise indemnified. Significant security incidents at competitor global investment firms in which we are not directly impacted could indirectly lead to increased costs from investor due diligence, revisions to insurance premiums and more extensive and/or frequent regulatory inspections.
Our information systems and technology may not continue to be able to accommodate our growth, and the cost of maintaining such systems may increase from its current level. For example, our existing systems may not be adequate to identify or control the relevant risks in investment strategies employed by new investment funds we may introduce. Any failure to accommodate growth, particularly in the Global Credit segment, or an increase in costs related to such information systems, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our business, including for certain information systems and technology and administration of our business development companies, structured credit funds and Global Investment Solutions segment. For example, Carlyle contracts information system backup and recovery services to certain portfolio companies. These third-party service providers could face ongoing cybersecurity threats and, as a result, unauthorized individuals could improperly gain access to our confidential data. Any attack on, or interruption or deterioration in, the performance of these third parties or failures of their information systems and technology could also impair the quality of the funds’ operations, affect our reputation, and adversely affect our businesses.
Our technology, data and intellectual property and the technology, data and intellectual property of our portfolio companies are also subject to a heightened risk of theft, disruption or compromise to the extent we and our portfolio companies engage in operations outside the United States, particularly in those jurisdictions that do not have comparable levels of protection of proprietary information and intangible assets, such as intellectual property and customer information and records. In addition, we and our portfolio companies may be required to compromise protections or forgo rights to technology, data and intellectual property in order to operate in or access markets in a foreign jurisdiction. Any such direct or indirect compromise of these assets could have a material adverse consequence on us or our investments.
A disaster or a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses, including a disruption involving electronic communications or other services used by us or third parties with whom we conduct business, or directly affecting our offices, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue to operate our business without interruption. Our disaster recovery programs may not be sufficient to mitigate the harm that may result from such a disaster or disruption. For example,
39


systematic risks such as a massive and prolonged global failure of Amazon or Microsoft’s cloud services could result in cascading catastrophic systems failures. We may also need to commit additional management, operational and financial resources to identify new professionals to join our firm and to maintain appropriate operational and financial systems to adequately support expansion. The market for hiring talented professionals, including IT and cybersecurity professionals, is competitive and we may not be able to grow at the pace we desire.
In addition, we, and our portfolio companies, may not be able to obtain or maintain sufficient insurance (including cyber insurance) on commercially reasonable terms or with adequate coverage levels against potential liabilities we may face in connection with potential claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may face a risk of loss from a variety of claims, including related to securities, antitrust, contracts, cyber incidents, fraud, business interruption and various other potential claims, whether or not such claims are valid. Insurance and other safeguards may only partially reimburse us for our losses, if at all, and if a claim is successful and exceeds or is not covered by our insurance policies, we may be required to pay a substantial amount in respect of such successful claim. Because of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies, particularly directors and officers, cyber and property insurance, have increased substantially and may increase further, and in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Moreover, the dollar amount of claims and/or the number of claims we experience may also increase at any time, which may have the result of further increasing our costs.
Certain losses of a catastrophic nature, such as wars, earthquakes, typhoons, pandemics, terrorist attacks or other similar events, may be uninsurable or may only be insurable at rates that are so high that maintaining coverage would cause an adverse impact on our business, our investment funds and their portfolio companies. Losses related to the COVID-19 pandemic have generally been excluded under most business property insurance policies and business interruption policies and going forward will not be covered under new policies. In general, losses related to terrorism are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against. Some insurers are excluding terrorism coverage from their all-risk policies. In some cases, insurers are offering significantly limited coverage against terrorist acts for additional premiums, which can greatly increase the total cost of casualty insurance for a property. As a result, we, our investment funds and their portfolio companies may not be insured or fully insured against terrorism or certain other catastrophic losses.
Our portfolio companies also rely on data and processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information, including highly sensitive financial and medical data. A disruption or compromise of these systems, including from a cyber-attack or cyber-incident, could have a material adverse effect on the value of these businesses. Our investment funds may invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or security breach than other assets or businesses. Such an event may have adverse consequences on our investment or assets of the same type or may require portfolio companies to increase preventative security measures or expand insurance coverage.
Failure to maintain the security of our information and technology networks, including personally identifiable information, intellectual property and proprietary business information could have a material adverse effect on us.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, and personally identifiable information of our employees, investors, and potential investors, in our data centers, on our networks and with our third-party service providers. Such data may be subject to U.S. and foreign data protection and privacy laws and other contractual obligations. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information are critical to our operations. Although we take various measures and have made, and will continue to make, significant investments to ensure the integrity of our systems and to safeguard against such failures or security breaches, including mechanisms for governance, strategy and risk management, there can be no assurance that these measures and investments will provide adequate protection. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these risks due to heavier reliance on online communication and the hybrid work environment, which may be less secure, and there has been a significant increase in hacking attempts by cyber-criminals. In 2022, Carlyle experienced no material cyber incidents and responded promptly and effectively to routine events, such as phishing campaigns and vendor breach notifications, resulting in no substantial harm to Carlyle assets. In addition, we and our employees have been and expect to continue to be the target of fraudulent calls and emails, the subject of impersonations and fraudulent requests for money, including attempts to redirect material payment amounts to fraudulent bank accounts, and other forms of spam attacks, phishing or other social engineering, supply chain attacks, ransomware or other events. We also have been, and could in the future be, the target of a type of wire transfer fraud known as business email compromise where a third party seeks to benefit from misrepresenting an employee or fund investor by improperly authorizing a wire transfer or change in wire instructions. While our policies and procedures have been effective against this fraud to date, a significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of investor, employee or other personally identifiable or proprietary business data, whether by third parties or as a result
40


of employee malfeasance or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us by the U.S. federal and state governments, the EU or other jurisdictions or by various regulatory organizations or exchanges. Such an event could also disrupt our operations and the services we provide to investors, damage our reputation, result in a loss of a competitive advantage, impact our ability to provide timely and accurate financial data, and cause a loss of confidence in our services and financial reporting, which could adversely affect our business, revenues, competitive position and investor confidence.
Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation
Laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, and data security worldwide may limit the use and adoption of our services and adversely affect our business.
Legislators and regulators around the world identify data security and privacy as top priorities. As a result, we are subject to an increasing variety of federal, state, local, and international laws, directives, and regulations, as well as contractual obligations, relating to the collection, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal information and other confidential data. The global legal frameworks for privacy, data protection, and data transfers are rapidly evolving and are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future.
In February 2022, the SEC proposed rules regarding cybersecurity that would require registered investment advisers and registered funds to implement written policies and procedures designed to address cybersecurity risks, report significant cybersecurity incidents to the SEC using a proposed form and within a prescribed time period, and keep enumerated cybersecurity-related books and records. In addition, in March 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule to mandate disclosure by all public companies of all cybersecurity incidents. These disclosures would include information such as: management and the board’s role and oversight of cybersecurity risks, applicable policies and procedures, and how if at all risks and incidents are likely to impact the financial statements. Moreover, certain incidents would have mandatory reporting on Form 8-K. In light of these proposed rules and the focus of federal regulators on cybersecurity generally in recent years, we expect increasing SEC enforcement activity related to cybersecurity matters, including by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations in its examination programs, where cybersecurity has been prioritized with an emphasis on, among other things, proper configuration of network storage devices, information security governance, and policies and procedures related to retail trading information security.
Although we maintain cybersecurity controls designed to prevent cyber incidents from occurring, no security is impenetrable to cyberattacks. It is possible that current and future cyber enforcement activity will target practices that we believe are compliant but the SEC deems otherwise. In addition, many jurisdictions in which we operate have other laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity, data transfers, data localization and protection of personal information. Any regulatory investigation into compliance with these laws and regulations would be costly and could lead to significant fines, service interruption, loss of licensure and other harms to the Company.
In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) establishes requirements applicable to the processing of personal data, affords data protection rights to individuals, and imposes penalties for serious data breaches. In addition, Brexit took effect in January 2020, which will lead to further legislative changes and reduces clarity as to the future burden of transferring data from the EEA to the United Kingdom. We may also need to make use of alternative data transfer mechanisms such as standard contractual clauses approved by the European Commission, or the SCCs. On June 4, 2021, the European Commission adopted new standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”) under the GDPR for the transfer of personal data of EEA residents to jurisdictions outside the EEA. In addition, the EEA and U.S. governments are negotiating a framework for trans-Atlantic data transfers and complying with this framework may require a certification process and operational changes. These updates and any future updates to data transfer rules may require us to expend significant resources to update our contractual arrangements and to comply with such obligations. Moreover, data protection authorities may require measures to be put in place in addition to SCCs for transfers to countries outside of the EEA. Our third-party service providers may also be affected by these changes. In addition to other impacts, we may experience additional costs to comply with these changes, and we and our customers face the potential for regulators in the EEA to apply different standards to the transfer of personal data from the EEA to the United States and other non-EEA countries. The UK and EEA are considering or have enacted a variety of other laws and regulations such as the Digital Operational Resilience Act (EEA), Online Safety Act (UK), and the Artificial Intelligence Act (EEA), all of which could have a material impact on Carlyle and its portfolio companies’ ability to conduct our businesses. We cannot predict how these data protection laws or regulations may develop.
41


China continues to strengthen its protections of personal information and tighten control over cross-border data transfers with the implementation of the Cybersecurity Law (“CSL”), Data Security Law (the “DSL”) and the Personal Information Protection Law (the “PIPL”). These laws may affect the business of Carlyle and our portfolio companies in the following ways. First, Carlyle and our portfolio companies may be subject to these laws when conducting business and processing personal information or other data in China. Second, these laws may apply extra-territorially to the processing of personal information and other data originating in China when conducted by Carlyle or our portfolio companies outside of China. Third, these laws may impose new regulations on cross-border data transfers and transfers to third-party vendors conducted by Carlyle and our portfolio companies. The PIPL imposes several conditions that limit certain cross-border transfer of personal information of Chinese residents, while the DSL restricts transfer of “important data” outside of China. The scope of “important data” remains unclear but may include certain data collected and/or generated by Carlyle and our portfolio companies in China, in which case these restrictions could harm Carlyle and its portfolio companies that rely on the ability to freely transfer data outside China. Finally, Carlyle and our portfolio companies may be contractually bound by certain compliance obligations when dealing with counterparties in China as a result of these laws.
In addition, the National Intelligence Law (“NIL”) allows authorities to request organizations like Carlyle and its portfolio companies to provide necessary support, assistance, and cooperation to the government. The NIL codifies broad police power, including the ability for intelligence officials to enter relevant restricted areas and venues, learn from and question relevant organizations, and collect relevant files, materials or items, including electronic information.
The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by the PIPL, CSL, DSL and NIL, along with any other cybersecurity and related laws in China, could have an adverse impact on our business and increase our compliance burden. A determination by the Chinese government that Carlyle or its portfolio companies have violated one of these laws could result in a variety of penalties, including fines of up to 5% of global revenues, warnings, disgorgement, suspension of business activities or licenses, shutting down websites or applications that collect sensitive information, and revocation of business licenses or relevant permits. Certain penalties can also apply to individual staff members responsible for a violation. The lack of clarity and regulatory guidance on some issues adds to the compliance risks. Any inability, or perceived inability, to adequately address privacy and data protection concerns, or comply with Chinese laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, contractual obligations, or other legal obligations could result in additional cost and liability and could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business and the business of our portfolio companies.
Many other foreign countries and governmental bodies in jurisdictions where Carlyle and our portfolio companies conduct business have privacy and data protection laws and regulations that are more restrictive than those in the United States. For example, the Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, the Australian Privacy Act, and the Brazilian Bank Secrecy Law. Global laws in this area are rapidly increasing in the scope and depth of their requirements, which are often extra-territorial in nature, and global regulators are seeking to enforce their countries’ laws outside of their borders. In addition, we frequently have added privacy compliance requirements as a result of our contractual obligations with counterparties. These legal and contractual obligations heighten our privacy obligations in the ordinary course of conducting our business in the U.S. and internationally.
In the United States, federal privacy legislation is being considered by Congress and may lead to significant new obligations for us and our portfolio companies. In the interim, a number of state laws are being passed, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect in January 2020. The CCPA provides for enhanced consumer protections for California residents, a private right of action for certain data breaches that is expected to increase related litigation, and statutory fines for CCPA violations. In addition, the CCPA requires covered companies to provide new disclosures to California residents and provides such residents new ways to opt-out of certain sales of personal information.
California voters also approved the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) in November 2020. Effective starting on January 1, 2023, the CPRA made significant modifications to the CCPA, including by expanding rights with respect to certain sensitive personal information and creating a new state agency for enforcing the CCPA. Unless and until a federal privacy law that preempts state laws is enacted, states will continue to shape the data privacy environment nationally. For example, Virginia enacted the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (the “VCDPA”), effective January 1, 2023, Colorado passed the Colorado Privacy Rights Act (the “CPA”), effective July 1, 2023, Connecticut passed the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (the “CDPA”), effective July 1, 2023, and Utah passed the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (the “UCPA”), effective December 31, 2023. Many other proposals exist in states across the U.S. that could increase our potential liability, increase our compliance costs, and affect our ability to process personal information integral to our business. Aspects of these state privacy statutes remain unclear, resulting in further legal uncertainty and potentially requiring us to modify our data practices and policies and to incur substantial additional compliance costs.
42


Complying with various existing, proposed, or yet to be proposed laws, regulations, amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws and regulations, and contractual or other obligations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, or information security may require us to make changes to our services to enable us or our customers to meet new legal requirements, incur substantial operational costs, modify our data practices and policies, and restrict our business operations. Any actual or perceived failure by us to comply with these laws, regulations, or other obligations may lead to significant fines, penalties, regulatory investigations, lawsuits, costs for remediation, and other liabilities.
For instance, regulatory investigations or penalties related to data protection failures could lead to negative publicity and may cause our investors to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures. Any inability, or perceived inability, to adequately address privacy and data protection concerns, or comply with applicable laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, contractual obligations, or other legal obligations also could result in additional cost and liability and could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business.
Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties.
Our business is subject to extensive regulation, including periodic examinations, by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in the jurisdictions in which we operate around the world. Many of these regulators, including U.S. and foreign government agencies and self-regulatory organizations and state securities commissions in the United States, are empowered to conduct investigations and administrative proceedings that can result in fines, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including censure, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer or investment adviser from registration or memberships. Even if an investigation or proceeding does not result in a sanction or the sanction imposed against us or our personnel by a regulator were small in monetary amount, the costs incurred in responding to such matters could be material and the adverse publicity relating to the investigation, proceeding or imposition of these sanctions could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing investors or fail to gain new investors or discourage others from doing business with us. Some of our investment funds invest in businesses that operate in highly regulated industries, including in businesses that are regulated by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and U.S. federal and state banking authorities. The regulatory regimes to which such businesses are subject may, among other things, condition our funds’ ability to invest in those businesses upon the satisfaction of applicable ownership restrictions or qualification requirements. Our failure to obtain or maintain any regulatory approvals necessary for our funds to invest in such industries may disqualify our funds from participating in certain investments or require our funds to divest themselves of certain assets.
In recent years, the SEC and its staff have focused on issues relevant to global investment firms and have formed specialized units devoted to examining such firms and, in certain cases, brought enforcement actions against the firms, their principals and their employees. We have seen and expect to continue to see a greater level of SEC enforcement activity under the current Administration, and while we believe that we have a robust compliance program in place, it is possible this enforcement activity will target practices that we believe are compliant and that were not targeted by the prior Administration. Recent SEC focus areas have also included the use and compensation of, and disclosure regarding, operating partners or consultants, outside business activities of firm principals and employees and group purchasing arrangements and general conflicts of interest disclosures. The SEC is also focused on adherence to practices disclosed in fund offering documents, management of conflicted transactions, management fee calculation, performance advertising and investment due diligence practices.
It is generally expected that the SEC’s oversight of global investment firms will continue to focus on concerns related to transparency, investor disclosure practices, investment risks and conflicts of interest, fees and expenses, liquidity, valuation of assets, and controls around material non-public information, which could impact Carlyle in various ways. For example, our private equity funds frequently engage operating executives and senior advisors who often work with our investment teams during due diligence, provide board-level governance and support and advise portfolio company management. Operating executives and senior advisors generally are third parties, are not considered Carlyle employees and typically are engaged by us pursuant to consulting agreements, and the investors in our private equity funds may bear the cost of the operating executive or senior advisor compensation, as permitted under the relevant fund legal documents. In some cases, an operating executive or senior advisor may be retained by a portfolio company directly and in such instances the portfolio company may compensate the operating executive or senior advisor directly (meaning that investors in our private equity funds may indirectly bear the cost of the operating executive’s or senior advisor’s compensation). While we believe we have made appropriate and timely disclosures regarding the engagement and compensation of our operating executives and senior advisors, the SEC staff may disagree.
43


The SEC has also signaled that it will continue to focus on issues specific to private investment funds, including performance advertising, the inclusion of preferred liquidity and disclosure terms in side letters, transparency of fund fees and expenses, and reporting of information to the SEC on Form ADV and Form PF, including proposed amendments to Form ADV that would require enhanced disclosure regarding cybersecurity incidents and ESG practices and proposed amendments to Form PF that would introduce “current reporting” requirements for certain events and require enhanced disclosure regarding fund investments and structures. Any new rulemaking by the SEC in these areas could have an impact on our business practices and result in additional operational, administrative and compliance burden and costs and could potentially result in reductions to our revenue, earnings and cash flow. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business.” We also regularly are subject to requests for information and informal or formal investigations by the SEC and other regulatory authorities, with which we routinely cooperate. In the current environment, even historical practices that have been previously examined are being revisited. For example, as part of a sweep investigation of financial services and investment advisory firms, in October 2022, we received a request for information from the SEC related to the preservation of certain types of electronic business communications (e.g., text messages and messages on WhatsApp, WeChat, and similar applications). We intend to cooperate fully with the SEC’s inquiry. These additional regulatory requirements will increase our compliance costs and may expose us to liabilities and penalties if we fail to comply with the applicable laws, rules and regulations.
We regularly rely on exemptions from various requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Exchange Act, the Investment Company Act, the Commodity Exchange Act, and the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), in conducting our asset management activities in the United States. If for any reason these exemptions were to become unavailable to us, we could become subject to regulatory action or third-party claims and our business could be materially and adversely affected. For example, in 2014, the SEC amended Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act to impose “bad actor” disqualification provisions that ban an issuer from offering or selling securities pursuant to the safe harbor in Rule 506 if the issuer, or any other “covered person,” is the subject of a criminal, regulatory or court order or other disqualifying event under the rule which has not been waived by the SEC. The definition of “covered person” under the rule includes an issuer’s directors, general partners, managing members and executive officers; affiliates who are also issuing securities in the offering; beneficial owners of 20% or more of the issuer’s outstanding equity securities; and promoters and persons compensated for soliciting investors in the offering. Accordingly, our ability to rely on Rule 506 to offer or sell securities would be impaired if we or any “covered person” is the subject of a disqualifying event under the rule and we are unable to obtain a waiver from the SEC.
Similarly, in conducting our asset management activities outside the United States, we rely on available exemptions from the regulatory regimes of various foreign jurisdictions. These exemptions from regulation within the United States and abroad are sometimes highly complex and may, in certain circumstances, depend on compliance by third parties whom we do not control. If for any reason these exemptions were to become unavailable to us, we could become subject to regulatory action or third-party claims and our business could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, the requirements imposed by our regulators are designed primarily to ensure the integrity of the financial markets and to protect investors in our funds and are not designed to protect our stockholders. Consequently, these regulations often serve to limit our activities and impose burdensome compliance requirements. See Item 1 “Business—Regulatory and Compliance Matters.”
We may become subject to additional regulatory and compliance burdens as we expand our product offerings and investment platform, including registered product offerings for retail investors. For example, we have a number of closed-end investment companies in our Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions segments that are subject to the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder, which, among other things, impose regulatory restrictions on principal transactions between, and joint transactions among, the investment company and certain of its affiliates, including its investment adviser. Certain of these investment companies are subject to additional securities law requirements due to their status as a publicly-traded issuer, as well as the listing standards of the applicable national securities exchange. Other jurisdictions, particularly in Europe and the United Kingdom, impose similar (if not greater) regulatory burdens on registered product offerings. We expect to offer more of these registered investment products in the future to U.S. and non-U.S. investors. These additional regulatory requirements will increase our compliance costs and may expose us to liabilities and penalties if we fail to comply with the applicable laws, rules and regulations.
We are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption, anti-bribery, and anti-money laundering laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as amended (“FCPA”), the U.S. domestic bribery statute, and the U.S. Travel Act, and other anti-corruption, anti-bribery, and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities. Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit us from authorizing, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or things of value to recipients in the public or private sector. In addition, we are subject to the accounting and internal controls
44


provisions of the FCPA, which require us to maintain accurate books and records and a system of internal controls sufficient to detect and prevent corrupt conduct. We are also subject to U.S. export controls and economic sanctions administered by the U.S. Commerce Department, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the U.S. Department of State. Such export control laws and regulations and economic sanctions are based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals, and are enforced against targeted countries, jurisdictions, territories, regimes, entities, organizations and individuals.
Laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions, including those addressing anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, economic sanctions or export control, may impose stricter or more onerous requirements than such laws of the United States, and complying with these foreign laws may disrupt our business or cause us to incur significantly more costs to comply with those laws. For example, in the UK, we are subject to the UK Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 regarding the prevention of money laundering and the financing of terrorism, as well as the UK Bribery Act 2010 prohibiting private and public sector bribery. Different laws may also contain conflicting provisions, making compliance with all laws more difficult. We cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which we might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered, interpreted or enforced. Our funds’ portfolio companies’ compliance policies and procedures may not prevent all instances of money laundering or bribery, or other prohibited transactions, including those arising from actions by employees, representatives, or other agents, for which we or they might be held responsible.
These various anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, export control, and sanctions laws and regulations relate to several aspects of our businesses, including servicing existing fund investors, finding new fund investors and sourcing new investments, as well as the activities of our funds’ portfolio companies, and require ongoing monitoring of both investors and portfolio assets. U.S. government regulators, including the U.S. Department of Justice, the SEC and OFAC, have devoted more resources to enforcement of the FCPA and export control and sanctions laws as enforcement has become more of a priority in recent years. Several other countries, including countries where we and our funds’ portfolio companies maintain operations or conduct business, have also significantly expanded their enforcement activities, especially regarding anti-corruption. Recently, the U.S. government has also used sanctions and export controls to address broader foreign and international economic policy goals. While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our personnel with the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws, as well as export control and economic sanctions laws, we cannot ensure that none of our employees, representatives, contractors, partners, and agents will take actions in violations of our policies and applicable law, for which we may be ultimately held responsible. Any determination that we have violated these laws could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation, disbarment and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow, as well as our reputation.
In addition, the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “ITRA”) expanded the scope of U.S. sanctions against Iran and Section 219 of the ITRA amended the Exchange Act to require companies subject to SEC reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act to disclose in their periodic reports specified dealings or transactions involving Iran, or other individuals and entities targeted by certain sanctions promulgated by OFAC, by the reporting company or any of its affiliates, including in our case some of our portfolio companies, during the period covered by the relevant periodic report. In some cases, the ITRA requires companies to disclose transactions even if they were permissible under U.S. law. In addition, the ITRA imposes an obligation to separately file with the SEC a notice that specified activities have been disclosed in our quarterly and annual reports, and the SEC is required to post this notice of disclosure on its website and send the report to the U.S. President and certain U.S. Congressional committees. Disclosure of ITRA-specified activity, even if such activity is legally permissible and not subject to sanctions under applicable law, and any fines or penalties actually imposed on us or our affiliates as a result of any impermissible activities, could harm our reputation and have a negative impact on our business. In the past, we have disclosed pursuant to Section 13 of the Exchange Act, certain permissible dealings and transactions and to date, we have not received notice of any investigation into such activities.
On January 18, 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division and the FTC launched a joint public inquiry aimed at strengthening enforcement against illegal mergers, citing evidence that many industries across the economy are becoming more concentrated and less competitive. Antitrust regulators in several foreign jurisdictions have announced similar antitrust enforcement initiatives. These initiatives are expected to increase scrutiny of mergers and acquisitions and to result in the adoption of more stringent guidelines for pre-approval of mergers. As a result, the process of obtaining pre-approval from the FTC and other non-U.S. antitrust authorities for mergers and acquisitions undertaken by the investment funds we manage is expected to become more challenging, more time consuming, and more expensive. If certain proposed acquisitions or dispositions of portfolio companies by our managed investment funds are delayed or rejected by antitrust regulators, it could have an adverse impact on our ability to generate future performance revenues and to fully invest the available capital in our funds, as well as reduce opportunities to exit and realize value from our fund investments.
45


If we fail to comply with this multitude of laws and regulations, even where conflicts of law arise, we could be exposed to claims for damages, civil or criminal penalties, incarceration of our employees, restrictions on our operations (including disbarment) and other liabilities, especially as non-U.S. regulators increase their enforcement activities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and our reputation. In addition, we may be subject to successor liability for FCPA violations or other acts of bribery, or violations of applicable anti-corruption, sanctions or export control laws committed by companies in which we or our funds invest or which we or our funds acquire.
Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), enacted in 2010, has imposed significant changes on almost every aspect of the U.S. financial services industry, including aspects of our business. On May 24, 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”) was signed into law. The Reform Act amends various sections of the Dodd-Frank Act, including by modifying the Volcker Rule to exempt certain insured depository institutions. The Reform Act and various other proposals focused on deregulation of the U.S. financial services industry may have the effect of increasing competition for our credit-focused businesses or otherwise reducing investment opportunities, which could adversely affect our business.
The Volcker Rule, as amended by the Reform Act, generally prohibits any “banking entity” (broadly defined as any insured depository institution, subject to certain exceptions including for depository institutions that do not have, and are not controlled by a company that has, more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and significant trading assets and liabilities, any company that controls such an institution, a non-U.S. bank that is treated as a bank holding company for purposes of U.S. banking law and any affiliate or subsidiary of the foregoing entities) from sponsoring, acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in a fund that is not subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act in reliance upon either Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. The Volcker Rule also authorizes the imposition of additional capital requirements and certain other quantitative limits on such activities engaged in by certain nonbank financial companies that have been determined to be systemically important by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) and subject to supervision by the Federal Reserve, although such entities are not expressly prohibited from sponsoring or investing in such funds. In July 2019, U.S. federal regulatory agencies adopted amendments to the Volcker Rule regulations to implement the Volcker Rule amendments included in the Reform Act, and also in 2019 such U.S. federal regulatory agencies adopted certain targeted amendments to the Volcker Rule regulations to simplify and tailor certain compliance requirements relating to the Volcker Rule.In June 2020, U.S. federal regulatory agencies adopted additional revisions to the Volcker Rule’s current restrictions on banking entities sponsoring and investing in certain covered hedge funds and private equity funds, including by adopting new exemptions allowing banking entities to sponsor and invest without limit in credit funds, venture capital funds, customer facilitation funds and family wealth management vehicles(the “Covered Fund Amendments”).The Covered Fund Amendments also loosen certain other restrictions on extraterritorial fund activities and direct parallel or co-investments made alongside covered funds. The Covered Fund Amendments should therefore expand the ability of banking entities to invest in and sponsor private funds. The Covered Fund Amendments, the Reform Act and such regulatory developments and various other proposals focused on deregulation of the U.S. financial services industry may have the effect of increasing competition for our businesses.
In June 2010, the SEC approved Rule 206(4)-5 under the Advisers Act regarding “pay to play” practices by investment advisers involving campaign contributions and other payments to government clients and elected officials able to exert influence on such clients. The rule prohibits investment advisers from providing advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years, subject to very limited exceptions, after the investment adviser, its senior executives or its personnel involved in soliciting investments from government entities make contributions to certain candidates and officials in a position to influence the hiring of an investment adviser by such government client. Any failure on our part to comply with the rule could expose us to significant penalties, loss of fees, and reputational damage. In August 2017, FINRA’s “pay to play” regulations went into effect. These FINRA rules effectively prohibit the receipt of compensation from state or local government agencies for solicitation and distribution activities within two years of a prohibited contribution by a broker-dealer or one of its covered associates. There have also been similar laws, rules and regulations and/or policies adopted by a number of states and municipal pension plans, which prohibit, restrict or require disclosure of payments to (and/or certain contracts with) state officials by individuals and entities seeking to do business with state entities, including investment by public retirement funds.
The Dodd-Frank Act also imposes a regulatory structure on the “swaps” market, including requirements for clearing, exchange trading, capital, margin, reporting, and recordkeeping. The CFTC has finalized many rules applicable to swap market participants, including business conduct standards for swap dealers, reporting and recordkeeping, mandatory clearing for certain swaps, exchange trading rules applicable to swaps, initial and variation margin requirements for uncleared swap transactions
46


and regulatory requirements for cross-border swap activities. These requirements could reduce market liquidity and adversely affect our business, including by reducing our ability to enter swaps.
The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes federal regulatory agencies to review and, in certain cases, prohibit compensation arrangements at financial institutions that give employees incentives to engage in conduct deemed to encourage inappropriate risk taking by covered financial institutions. On May 16, 2016, the SEC and other federal regulatory agencies proposed a rule that would apply requirements on incentive-based compensation arrangements of “covered financial institutions,” including certain registered investment advisers and broker-dealers above a specific asset threshold. This rule, if adopted, could limit our ability to recruit and retain investment professionals and senior management executives. However, the proposed rule remains pending and may be subject to significant modifications. In addition, as directed under the Dodd-Frank Act, on October 26, 2022, the SEC adopted final rules under which companies listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq will be required to adopt “clawback” policies that mandate recovery by companies of certain incentive-based compensation awarded to current and former executives in the event of an accounting restatement.
In May 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act became law, which modified automatic additional regulatory compliance issues for financial entities that were deemed “Systemically Important Financial Institutions” (SIFI) from $50 billion AUM to $250 billion AUM. There is legislative risk under the current Administration that such designation will revert back to $50 billion and expand its application to include private equity asset management firms.
Following the 2020 presidential and congressional elections in the United States, there has been an increased risk of legislative and regulatory action that could adversely limit and affect our and our funds’ portfolio companies’ business. For example, proposed legislation that was introduced into the U.S. Congress in July 2019 was reintroduced in October 2021, containing a number of provisions that, if they were to become law, would adversely impact alternative asset management firms. Among other things, the bill would: (1) subject private funds and certain holders of economic interests therein to joint and several liability for all liabilities of portfolio companies; (2) require private funds to offer identical terms and benefits to all limited partners; (3) require disclosure of names of each limited partner invested in a private fund, as well as sensitive fund and portfolio company-level information; (4) impose a limitation on the deductibility of interest expense only applicable to companies owned by private funds; (5) modify settled bankruptcy law to target transactions by private equity funds; (6) increase tax rates on carried interest; and (7) prohibit portfolio companies from paying dividends or repurchasing their shares or outsourcing jobs at portfolio companies during the first two years following the acquisition of the portfolio company. In addition, in August 2021, legislation was introduced in the Senate that would require holders of carried interest to recognize a specified amount of deemed compensation income each year regardless of whether the investment partnership recognizes income or gain and regardless of whether and when the holders receive distributions in respect of their carried interests. If these proposed bills or parts thereof, or other similar legislation, were to become law, it could negatively impact us, our funds’ portfolio companies and our investors.
The SEC’s amended rule for investment adviser marketing became effective in November 2022. The rule increases regulatory obligations and potential scrutiny and imposes more prescriptive requirements on investment advisers’ marketing activities, including but not limited to prohibitions on advertisements that are misleading or contain material statements that an investment adviser cannot substantiate as well as requirements for performance advertising and the use of placement agent arrangements. The rule impacts the marketing of certain of our funds and other investment advisory functions. Compliance with the new rule entails compliance and operational costs. In September 2022, the SEC staff published a risk alert indicating that the staff will conduct a number of specific national initiatives, as well as a broad review through the examination process, for compliance with the new marketing rule.
Future legislation, regulation or guidance may have an adverse effect on the fund industry generally and/or us specifically. Financial services regulation, including regulations applicable to our business, has increased significantly in recent years, and may in the future be subject to further enhanced governmental scrutiny and/or increased regulation, including resulting from changes in U.S. executive administration or Congressional leadership. The SEC has also signaled that it intends to pursue additional regulation of private fund fees and conflicts of interest, including potentially requiring greater transparency of fund fees and expenses:
In February 2022, the SEC proposed new rules and amendments to existing rules under the Advisers Act specifically related to registered advisers and their activities with respect to private funds (the “SEC Proposed Rule”). If enacted, the proposed rules and amendments could have a significant impact on advisers to private funds, including Carlyle. In particular, the SEC has proposed to: limit circumstances in which a fund manager can be indemnified by a private fund; increase reporting requirements by private funds to investors concerning performance, fees and expenses; require registered advisers to obtain an annual audit for private funds and also require such fund’s auditor to notify the SEC
47


upon the occurrence of certain material events; enhance requirements, including the need to obtain a fairness opinion and make certain disclosures, in connection with adviser-led secondary transactions (also known as general partner-led secondaries); prohibit advisers from engaging in certain practices, such as, without limitation, charging accelerated fees for unperformed services or fees and expenses associated with an examination to private fund clients; and impose limitations and new disclosure requirements regarding preferential treatment of investors in private funds in side letters or other arrangements with an adviser. The SEC also proposed amendments to the existing books and records and compliance rules for investment advisers that complement these rules and require that all registered advisers document their annual compliance review in writing. The SEC has indicated that it will seek to have a final vote to adopt these proposed regulations in 2023. If adopted, including with modifications, this new SEC Proposed Rule could have a significant effect on private fund advisers and their operations, including increasing compliance burdens and associated regulatory costs, increasing litigation risk, reducing the ability to receive expense or indemnification reimbursements, and enhancing the risk of regulatory action, including public regulatory sanctions and may result in a change to our practices and create additional regulatory uncertainty. Further, we note that in connection with the SEC Proposed Rule, if such rule were to be enacted, it could also significantly increase the cost of insurance, specifically D&O and E&O insurance, or may even make such insurance coverage unavailable.
In January and August 2022, the SEC proposed changes to Form PF, a confidential form relating to reporting by private funds and intended to be used for systemic risk oversight purposes. These proposals, which represent an expansion of existing reporting obligations, if adopted, would require private fund managers, including us, to report to the SEC within one business day the occurrence of certain fund-related and portfolio company events. The SEC has indicated that it will seek to have a final vote to adopt these regulations in 2023. Increased regulations and disclosure obligations could result in our incurring higher costs if new laws or disclosure obligations require us to spend more time, hire additional personnel, or buy new technology to comply effectively.
In February 2022, the SEC issued two releases that proposed, respectively, rule amendments to accelerate the filing deadlines for companies to make filings of beneficial ownership and to expand the scope of instances where such a filing is required, and rule proposals to require certain asset managers to file with the SEC on a monthly basis certain data related to their short sales activity. The SEC has indicated that it will seek to have a final vote to adopt these proposed regulations in 2023. If these proposals are adopted, we may need to devote additional resources to fulfilling our beneficial ownership and short-sale reporting obligations and there may be additional regulatory attention focused on such activities.
In October 2022, the SEC proposed a new rule and related amendments that would impose substantial obligations on registered investment advisers to conduct initial due diligence and ongoing monitoring of a broad universe of service providers that we may use in our investment advisory business. If these proposed rules take effect, they could increase limitations on our ability to use service providers in connection with our investment advisory business, impose additional costs and burdens on our use and monitoring of service providers, and subject us to heightened regulatory scrutiny.
The SEC has also proposed numerous new and amended rules that would apply to market participants that we regularly interact with as counterparties or to our other business activities, including broker-dealers’ execution of trades and clearance and settlement of trades. The SEC has indicated that it will seek to have a final vote to adopt many of these proposed regulations in 2023. If these proposed rules become effective, they could affect our business by making it more costly financially or burdensome for us to engage in certain business transactions. In addition, an amended SEC rule and subsequent guidance would, beginning in January 2025, prohibit broker dealers from providing price quotations for certain private debt security offerings unless information about the issuer of these securities is current and publicly available. This rule could affect our ability to trade in certain private debt securities.
In September 2022, the SEC announced charges against 15 broker-dealers and one affiliated investment adviser for widespread and longstanding failures by the firms and their employees to maintain and preserve electronic communications. The firms admitted the facts set forth in their respective SEC orders, acknowledged that their conduct violated recordkeeping provisions of the federal securities laws, agreed to pay combined penalties of more than $1.1 billion, and agreed to implement improvements to their compliance policies and procedures to settle these matters. As part of a sweep investigation of financial services and investment advisory firms, in October 2022, we received a request for information from the SEC related to the preservation of certain types of electronic business communications (e.g., text messages and messages on WhatsApp, WeChat, and similar applications). We intend to cooperate fully with the SEC’s inquiry.
48


It is difficult to determine the full extent of the impact on us of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed or whether any of the proposals will become law. Any changes in the regulatory framework applicable to our business, including the changes described above, may impose additional costs on us, impact our ability to generate revenue, require the attention of our senior management or result in limitations on the manner in which we conduct our business. Moreover, we anticipate there may be an increase in regulatory investigations of the trading and other investment activities of private funds, including our investment funds. Compliance with any new laws or regulations (including recent heightened SEC scrutiny regarding adviser compliance with advisers’ own internal policies) could make compliance more difficult and expensive, affect the manner in which we conduct our business and adversely affect our profitability.
Changing regulations regarding derivatives and commodity interest transactions could adversely impact various aspects of our business.
The regulation of derivatives and commodity interest transactions in the United States and other countries is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to ongoing modification by governmental and judicial action. We and our affiliates enter into derivatives transactions for various purposes, including to manage the financial risks related to our business. Accordingly, the impact of this evolving regulatory regime on our business is difficult to predict, but it could be substantial and adverse.
    Managers of certain pooled investment vehicles with exposure to certain types of derivatives may be required to register with the CFTC as commodity pool operators (“CPOs”) and/or commodity trading advisors (“CTAs”) and become members of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”). As such, certain of our or our subsidiaries’ risk management or other commodities interest-related activities may be subject to CFTC oversight. Consequently, certain CFTC rules expose global investment firms, such as us, to increased registration and reporting requirements in connection with transactions in futures, swaps and other derivatives regulated by the CFTC. These regulations have required us to reassess certain business practices related to our pooled vehicles, consider registration of certain entities with the CFTC or file for additional exemptions from such registration requirements. In addition, as a result of their derivatives-related activities, certain of our entities also may be subject to a wide range of other regulatory requirements, such as:
potential compliance with certain commodities interest position limits or position accountability rules;
administrative requirements, including recordkeeping, confirmation of transactions and reconciliation of trade data; and
mandatory central clearing and collateral requirements.
Our business may incur increased ongoing costs associated with monitoring compliance with the CFTC registration and exemption obligations across platforms and complying with the various reporting and record-keeping requirements. In addition, newly instituted and amended regulations could significantly increase the cost of entering into derivative contracts (including through requirements to post collateral that could adversely affect our available liquidity), materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against risks that we encounter, reduce our ability to restructure our existing derivative contracts, and increase our exposure to less creditworthy counterparties. If we reduce our use of derivatives as a result of such regulations (and any new regulations), our results of operations may become more volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to satisfy our debt obligations or plan for and fund capital expenditures.
The short-term and long-term impact of the Basel capital standards is uncertain.
In June 2011, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, an international body comprised of senior representatives of bank supervisory authorities and central banks from 27 countries, including the United States, announced the final framework for a comprehensive set of capital and liquidity standards, commonly referred to as “Basel III,” for internationally active banking organizations and certain other types of financial institutions. The Basel III standards were revised in 2017 as part of a package of reforms referred to as “Basel IV” by the banking industry. These standards generally require banks to hold more capital, predominantly in the form of common equity, than under the previous capital framework, reduce leverage and improve liquidity standards. U.S. federal banking regulators have adopted, and continue to adopt, final regulations to implement these standards for U.S. banking organizations.
The ongoing adoption of these rules could restrict the ability of banks to maintain certain levels or types of capital market exposures under the present structure of their balance sheets, and cause these entities to raise additional capital in order to stay active in our marketplaces. As a result, their businesses, results of operations, financial condition or prospects could be
49


materially adversely affected, which in turn could have unintended adverse consequences for us, through higher borrowing costs, reduced access to certain types of credit and increased costs and difficulty for us or our funds to enter into transactions in the normal course of our business. Moreover, these increased regulatory responsibilities and increased costs could reduce trading by a number of market participants, which could in turn adversely impact liquidity and increase volatility in the markets and expose our funds to greater risks in connection with their trading activities.
Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business.
Similar to the environment in the United States, the current environment in jurisdictions outside the United States in which we operate, in particular the EU and the UK, has become subject to an expanding body of regulation. Governmental regulators and other authorities in the EU and the UK have proposed or implemented a number of initiatives and additional rules and regulations that could adversely affect our business.
New prudential regimes for EU and UK investment firms. On December 5, 2019, a new EU legislative package replacing the existing prudential framework for EU investment firms was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, which took effect on June 26, 2021. The legislation consists of the Investment Firm Regulation and the Investment Firm Directive (together “IFR/IFD”). IFR/IFD represents a complete overhaul of “prudential” regulation (i.e., capital adequacy, liquidity adequacy, governance, remuneration policies and practices, public transparency and regulatory reporting) in the EU and substantially increases regulatory capital requirements for certain investment firms and imposes more onerous remuneration rules, and revised and extended internal governance, disclosure, reporting, liquidity, and group “prudential” consolidation requirements (among other things). IFR/IFD affects AlpInvest, one of our subsidiaries, because it is an alternative investment fund manager in the Netherlands with MiFID top-up permissions to provide investment services.
The UK has implemented its own version of IFR/IFD, the Investment Firms Prudential Regime (the “IFPR”), which took effect from January 1, 2021. The IFPR applies to our subsidiaries that are UK investment firms under the post-Brexit UK-retained Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (as restated, “MiFID II”), namely CECP and CELF. Under the IFPR, among other requirements, both CECP and CELF are required to maintain a more onerous policy on remuneration, set an appropriate ratio between the variable and fixed components of total remuneration and meet requirements on the structure of variable remuneration. These requirements may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain staff. IFPR also resulted in increased regulatory capital and liquidity adequacy requirements for CECP, in particular, which may continue to increase the costs of doing business and may impede intra-group capital and cash flows.
AIFMD. The AIFMD was implemented in most jurisdictions in the EEA, on July 22, 2014. The AIFMD regulates alternative investment fund managers (“AIFMs”) established in the EEA that manage alternative investment funds (“AIFs”). The AIFMD also regulates and imposes regulatory obligations in respect of the marketing in the EEA by AIFMs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere) of AIFs (whether established in the EEA or elsewhere). The UK implemented AIFMD while it was still a member of the EU and “onshored” it as part of UK law, such that similar requirements continue to apply in the UK notwithstanding Brexit. Abingworth is authorized in the UK as an AIFM by the FCA. AlpInvest, one of our subsidiaries, obtained authorization in 2015 and is licensed as an AIFM in the Netherlands. Additionally, in 2017, one of our subsidiaries, Carlyle Real Estate SGR S.p.A, was registered as an AIFM in Italy and in 2018, one of our subsidiaries, CIM Europe, obtained authorization as an AIFM in Luxembourg.
In 2017, the European Commission started a review of AIFMD. The European Commission published a report on the operation of the AIFMD in January 2019, which identified certain areas requiring further analysis. A subsequent report on the application and scope of the AIFMD was published in June 2020. Following these reports, the European Commission launched a public consultation relating to its review of the AIFMD in October 2020, which closed on January 29, 2021. In November 2021, the European Commission published draft legislation, commonly referred to as “AIFMD II.” The European Commission’s draft legislation proposed a number of amendments to the AIFMD, including more onerous delegation requirements, enhanced substance requirements, additional liquidity management provisions for AIFMs to the extent that they manage open-ended AIFs, and revised regulatory reporting and investor disclosures requirements. The draft proposed significant new requirements relating to the activities of funds that originate loans including new restrictions on the structure that such funds may take. In addition, the draft proposed to introduce new conditions for non-EEA AIFMs, such as certain of our US affiliates, to be able to make use of the national private placement regimes of EEA states, including a condition that the jurisdiction of neither of the AIFM and AIF have been identified as non-cooperative third countries for tax purposes nor deemed by the EU not to comply fully with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and thereby to ensure an effective exchange of information in tax matters. This gives rise to a risk that certain of our AIFs may not be able to take advantage of such regimes to raise capital from EEA investors, potentially with little notice. AIFMD II is currently passing through the EU ordinary legislative process, involving scrutiny and amendment by the
50


European Council and the European Parliament. Agreement on the legislation between the European Commission, European Council and European Parliament is expected to be reached during 2023, after which the final shape of the new regime, and any impact on us or our subsidiaries, will be clearer. The new regime will come into force two years after this final agreement is reached and fully approved with implementation currently expected in 2025.
Given the significance of this review process as well as its potential impact on the European fund industry framework, we have been considering the potential impact of AIFMD II on our business, particularly with regard to delegation of certain AIFM duties to third-countries that may affect both operating models of CIM Europe and AlpInvest, extension of the directive to third country firms and a push towards harmonization of the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (“UCITS”) and AIFMD frameworks. AIFMD II has the potential to limit market access for our non-EU funds. Moreover, compliance with AIFMD II may, among other things, increase the cost and complexity of raising capital, may slow the pace of fundraising, limit operations, increase operational costs and disadvantage our investment funds as bidders for and potential owners of private companies located in the EEA when compared to non-AIF/AIFM competitors. It is not yet clear to what extent, if any, the UK would reflect AIFMD II in its domestic rules.
CBDF Directive and CBDF Regulation. In August 2021, two main legislative instruments, Directive (EU) 2019/1160 (the “CBDF Directive”) and Regulation (EU) 2019/1156 (the “CBDF Regulation”), came into effect. The CBDF Regulation and CBDF Directive lay out, among other things, general principles to be adhered to by fund managers when drafting pre-marketing and marketing communications. The legislative instruments also harmonize the pre-marketing requirements across the EEA by requiring EU AIFMs to notify their local regulator of their intention to pre-market in certain EEA jurisdictions within two weeks of pre-marketing having begun. CIM Europe and AlpInvest began to file such pre-marketing notifications with the CSSF for any new fund and we are working to incorporate the relevant requirements under the CBDF Directive and CBDF Regulation into the firm’s global marketing policy.
Solvency II. The European solvency framework and prudential regime for insurers and reinsurers, under the Solvency II Directive 2009/138/EC (“Solvency II”), took effect in full on January 1, 2016. Solvency II is a regulatory regime that imposes economic risk-based solvency requirements across all EU Member States and consists of three pillars: Pillar I-quantitative capital requirements, based on a valuation of the entire balance sheet; Pillar II-qualitative regulatory review, which includes governance, internal controls, enterprise risk management and supervisory review process; and Pillar III-market discipline, which is accomplished through reporting of the insurer’s financial condition to regulators and the public. Solvency II is supplemented by European Commission Delegated Regulation (E.U.) 2015/35 (the “Delegated Regulation”), other European Commission “delegated acts” and binding technical standards, and guidelines issued by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. The Delegated Regulation sets out detailed requirements for individual insurance and reinsurance undertakings, as well as for groups, based on the overarching provisions of Solvency II, which together make up the core of the single prudential rulebook for insurance and reinsurance undertakings in the European Union.
Solvency II sets out stronger capital adequacy and risk management requirements for European insurers and reinsurers and, in particular, dictates how much capital such firms must hold against their liabilities and introduces a risk-based assessment of those liabilities. In addition, Solvency II imposes, among other things, substantially greater quantitative and qualitative capital requirements for insurers and reinsurers as well as other supervisory and disclosure requirements. While we are not subject to Solvency II, many of our European insurer or reinsurer fund investors are subject to this directive, as applied under applicable domestic law. Solvency II also may impact insurers’ and reinsurers’ investment decisions and their asset allocations. Moreover, insurers and reinsurers will be subject to more onerous data collation and reporting requirements. As a result, there is potential for Solvency II to have an adverse indirect effect on our businesses by, among other things, restricting the ability of European insurers and reinsurers to invest in our funds and imposing on us extensive disclosure and reporting obligations for those insurers and reinsurers that do invest in our funds. A broad review of Solvency II was carried out by the European Commission in 2020 (the “Solvency II 2020 review”), with input from the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”). This included a related public consultation launched by the European Commission in July 2020. On December 17, 2020, EIOPA submitted its opinion on the Solvency II 2020 review to the European Commission. The Solvency II 2020 review is expected to result in amendments to various aspects of Solvency II, although the extent of such amendments is currently unknown. Following this, on September 22, 2021, the European Commission published proposed legislation to amend the Solvency II Directive. The proposals are under review of the subject to the EU ordinary legislative process involving the European Parliament and the European Council, with the implementation date of the revised Solvency II Directive currently unknown. It is unclear at this stage the extent to which the proposed amendments to Solvency II will have an indirect effect on our businesses.
MiFID II. The recast Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (collectively referred to as “MiFID II”) came into effect on January 3, 2018. Although the UK has now withdrawn from the EU,
51


its rules implementing the recast Markets in Financial Instruments Directive continue to have effect and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation has been on-shored into UK law (subject to certain amendments to ensure it operates properly in a UK-specific context) in connection with such withdrawal. MiFID II amended the existing MiFID regime and, among other requirements, introduced new organizational and conduct of business requirements for investment firms in the EEA. Certain requirements of MiFID II also apply to AIFMs with a MiFID “top-up” permission, such as AlpInvest.
MiFID II extended MiFID requirements in a number of areas such as the receipt and payment of inducements (including investment research), suitability and appropriateness assessments, conflicts of interest, record-keeping, costs and charges disclosures, best execution, product design and governance, and transaction and trade reporting. Under MiFID II, national competent authorities are also required to establish position limits in relation to the maximum size of positions that a relevant person can hold in certain commodity derivatives. The limits apply to contracts traded on trading venues and their economically equivalent OTC contracts. The position limits established, as amended from time to time, and our ability to rely on any exemption thereunder may affect the size and types of investments we may make. Failure to comply with MiFID II and its associated legislative acts could result in sanctions from national regulators, the loss of market access and a number of other adverse consequences that would have a detrimental impact on our business. Certain aspects of MIFID II and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulations (“MiFIR”) are subject to review and change in both the EU and the UK
Swiss Marketing Regulations. The Swiss Financial Services Act (FinSA) and the Financial Institution Act (FinIA) came into force on January 1, 2020, with a transition period that ended on December 31, 2021. FinSA seeks to protect clients of financial service providers and to establish comparable conditions for the provision of financial services by financial service providers (FSP), and thus contributes to enhancing the reputation and competitiveness of Switzerland's financial center. FinIA introduces coordinated supervision for the various categories of financial institutions: portfolio managers, trustees, managers of collective assets, fund management companies and securities firms. The new Swiss regulations have an impact on the offering and marketing foreign investment fund shares into Switzerland on a cross-border basis and creates new requirements for financial service providers.
Anti-Money Laundering. During 2020, two new EU Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Directives came into force: the fifth AML EU Directive (AMLD5) and the sixth AML EU Directive (AMLD6). AMLD5 was implemented into UK law on January 10, 2020. The changes under AMLD5 include new more stringent customer due diligence measures and requirements to report discrepancies between information held and the Companies House register and to conduct risk assessments prior to the launch or use of new products, and business practices. AMLD5 has added complexity to our internal processes and any perceived shortcomings in our adoption of AMLD5 could create reputational risks to our business. AMLD6 harmonizes the definition of money laundering across the EU, expands the number of offenses that fall under the definition of money laundering and extends criminal liability to include punishments for legal persons, including partnership entities. On July 20, 2021, the European Commission presented an ambitious package of legislative proposals to strengthen the EU’s anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) rules, including the creation of a new pan-EU supervisory authority to combat money laundering. The UK government opted out of AMLD6.
Securitization Regulation. Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 (the “Securitization Regulation”) is a new framework for European securitizations which came into effect on January 1, 2019. There is a risk that a non-EU AIFM that markets funds in the EU that invest in securitization positions could be within scope of certain requirements under the Securitization Regulation. To the extent a non-EU AIFM is within the scope of the Securitization Regulation, it could only hold a securitization exposure where the originator, sponsor or original lender retains 5% of the securitization. If our non-EU AIFMs fall within the scope of the Securitization Regulation, it could affect the asset values of certain of our funds, force divestment of certain assets at depressed prices, and increase the operating cost of our CLOs. The UK has adopted the Securitization Regulation and therefore similar requirements continue to apply in the UK notwithstanding Brexit. The UK Government announced in December 2022 that it would consult on reforms to UK financial services regulation, including the Securitization Regulation.
ESG and Sustainable Finance Regulation. New regulatory initiatives related to ESG and sustainable finance that are or will be applicable to us, our funds and their portfolio companies could adversely affect our business. In 2018, the European Commission adopted an “action plan on financing sustainable growth” (the “Action Plan”). The Action Plan is, among other things, designed to define and reorient investment towards more sustainable economic activities. The Action Plan contemplates, among other things, creating an EU green bond standard and establishing EU labels for green financial products; clarifying asset managers’ and institutional investors’ duties regarding sustainability in their investment decision-making processes; increasing disclosure requirements in the financial services sector around sustainability; increasing the transparency of companies on their ESG policies and related processes and management systems; and introducing a “green supporting factor” in the EU prudential rules for banks and insurance companies to incorporate climate risks and other environmental factors into banks’ and insurance companies’ risk management policies.
52


On June 22, 2020, the Official Journal of the European Union published a classification system that establishes a list of environmentally sustainable economic activities and sets out four overarching conditions that an economic activity has to meet in order to qualify as environmentally sustainable (Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088, “Taxonomy Regulation”). The Taxonomy Regulation, among other things, introduces mandatory disclosure and reporting requirements and supplements the framework set out in the Sustainable Financial Disclosure Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector, “SFDR”), which requires certain disclosures in relation to whether and, if so, how sustainability risks and negative impacts on environmental and social factors are taken into account in the investment process and the likely impacts of sustainability risks on the returns of the financial products. Financial products that have as their objective “sustainable investment” or that promote binding environmental or social characteristics are required to disclose that objective or those characteristics in pre-contractual disclosures required pursuant to the AIFMD and report on an ongoing basis their performance in achieving that objective or those characteristics in periodic reports produced pursuant to the AIFMD. In addition, if a financial product does not promote environmental or social characteristics or does not have as its objective “sustainable investment,” the information to be disclosed in accordance with applicable sectoral legislation must also be followed by a statement indicating that the financial product does not take into account EU criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activities. The disclosure requirements in the SFDR are supplemented by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 of 6 April 2022, which requires enhanced disclosures in pre-contractual documents, on websites and in periodic reports.
For us, this primarily impacts our AIFMs and the funds that they manage by requiring certain firm-level disclosures on our website relating to how sustainability risks are integrated into investment processes, consideration of adverse impacts of investment decisions on sustainability factors and transparency of remuneration policies on the integration of sustainability risk, as well as inclusion of certain information in pre-contractual and periodic disclosures required pursuant to the AIFMD. We have been working with external counsel to prepare such disclosures and to ensure that relevant internal teams understand the investor relations and other implications of product categorization and reporting. In respect of public website disclosure requirements for private funds, we intend to continue to comply with and monitor EU public transparency requirements while also complying with securities offering laws, such as the Securities Act.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1255 amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 231/2013 to require that sustainability risks are integrated into the investment decision-making, risk management and compliance functions and processes of EU AIFMs. These requirements became effective and apply to us beginning August 1, 2022. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1253, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/565, requires, among other things, certain firms to carry out a mandatory assessment of the sustainability preferences of clients; integrate sustainability into risk management policies; and consider sustainability factors in the product approval and governance process. These requirements became effective and apply to us beginning August 2, 2022.
There is a risk that a significant reorientation in the market following the implementation of these sustainable finance regulations and further measures could be adverse to our portfolio companies if they are perceived to be less valuable as a consequence of, among other things, their carbon footprint or allegations or evidence of “greenwashing.” There is also a risk that market expectations in relation to the SFDR categorization of financial products could adversely affect our ability to raise capital.
In this respect, sustainable finance initiatives continue to evolve rapidly and it is not possible at this stage to fully assess how our business will be affected with certainty. We are monitoring developments in relation to EU sustainable finance as well as corporate sustainability reporting and proposals for laws requiring due diligence of supply chains. Guidance from EU policymakers and financial supervisors changes the frame of reference frequently, for example, a recent consultation paper on guidance on the use of ESG-related terms in fund names. We, our funds and their portfolio companies are subject to a risk that similar measures might be introduced in other jurisdictions in which we or they currently have investments or plan to invest in the future.
The FCA has introduced a new regulatory framework focused on implementing the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) and, in particular, by introducing mandatory TCFD-aligned disclosure requirements for certain FCA authorized firms. These rules are set out in a new ESG Sourcebook in the Business Standards section of the FCA Handbook of Rules and Guidance (“ESG Sourcebook”). The rules capture certain asset managers including, so far as relevant, certain private fund advisors such as CECP and investment portfolio managers such as CELF, as well as insurers and FCA-regulated pension providers. There is a phased approach to the implementation of these rules. For the largest in-scope firms (those with over £50 billion in AUM calculated as a 3-year rolling average), the rules
53


applied beginning January 1, 2022, with the first public disclosures to be made by June 30, 2023. For those below this threshold but above £5 billion in AUM (calculated as a 3-year rolling average), the rules will apply beginning January 1, 2023, with disclosures to be made by June 30, 2024.
On October 25, 2022, the UK FCA published a further consultation and proposal for sustainability disclosure requirements and sustainability labels for investment products (“CP22/20”), which specifies, among other requirements, an anti-greenwashing rule and sustainability-related disclosure requirements in respect of certain financial products and firms. CP22/20 focuses on UK-managed funds and investment portfolios and does not cover overseas products marketed in the UK. However, the FCA has indicated that it intends to undertake a further consultation on expanding the scope of these requirements potentially to cover overseas products and pension products. CP22/20 proposes an anti-greenwashing rule that will apply to all FCA-regulated firms and is expected to become effective immediately on the publication of the final rules, which is currently anticipated for June 30, 2023. Additional requirements, which are subject to consultation and subsequent amendments, will also create certain financial product- and firm-related disclosures and are provisionally set to become effective from June 30, 2024 and at certain periodic intervals afterwards. This regime diverges from other international sustainability-related disclosure regimes, including the EU SFDR and the SEC proposals. We are monitoring these developments and how they may impact our businesses.
In March 2021, the SEC announced the establishment of an enforcement task force to examine ESG practices and disclosures by public companies and investment managers. In 2022, the SEC commenced enforcement actions against at least two investment advisers relating to ESG disclosures and policies and procedures failures, and we expect that there will be a greater level of enforcement activity in this area in the future. In addition, in May 2022, the SEC announced two rule proposals that would result in more stringent regulations of ESG funds and ESG-related claims: (i) the proposed rule on “Enhanced Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies about Environmental, Social, and Governance Investment Practices” (the “ESG Funds Reporting Rule”) and (ii) the proposed rule on “Investment Company Names,” which would amend Rule 35d-1 (Names Rule) under the 1940 Act. Among other changes, these proposals would prevent registered funds other than ESG-focused funds (as defined in the SEC’s enhanced disclosure proposal) from using ESG terminology such as “green,” “sustainable” or “ESG-focused” in their names and require funds that integrate ESG factors into their investment strategies to provide enhanced disclosures regarding ESG strategies, how ESG (including greenhouse gas emissions) is integrated into investment decision-making, and how funds engage with portfolio companies on ESG matters. In addition, under the ESG Funds Reporting Rule, funds that make ESG factors a significant or primary consideration in investment decisions would be required, subject to certain exceptions, to report on portfolio company greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon footprint and weighted average carbon intensity.
In 2022, the SEC also proposed extensive rules aimed at enhancing and standardizing climate-related disclosures in an effort to foster greater consistency, comparability and reliability of climate-related information. The proposal, if adopted, would require domestic registrants and foreign private issuers to include certain climate-related information in their registration statements and annual reports, including data regarding greenhouse gas emissions and information regarding climate-related risks and opportunities and related financial impacts, governance, and strategy.Although the ultimate date of effectiveness and the final form and substance of the requirements for the proposed rule is not yet known and the ultimate scope and impact on our business is uncertain, compliance with the proposed rule, if finalized, may result in increased legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly.
Moreover, the SEC has also announced that it is working on proposals for mandatory disclosure of certain other ESG-related matters, including with respect to board diversity and human capital management. At this time, there is uncertainty regarding the scope of such proposals or when they would become effective. As regulations develop, we will consider the implications for our business of the overlapping global measures, and how they fit together. Compliance with any new laws or regulations increases our regulatory burden and could make compliance more difficult and expensive, increase the risk that we are subject to enforcement, affect the manner in which we or our portfolio companies conduct our businesses and adversely affect our profitability.
Compliance with sustainable finance frameworks of this nature, including the Taxonomy Regulation and the SFDR, may create an additional compliance burden and increased legal, compliance, governance, reporting and other costs to us, our funds and their portfolio companies because of the need to collect certain information to meet the disclosure requirements; the need to update or develop new policies and processes to meet regulatory requirements and associated ESG commitments, claims and initiatives; and changes to the manner in which we, our funds or their portfolio companies conduct business. In addition, where there are uncertainties regarding the operation of sustainable finance frameworks, a lack of official, conflicting or inconsistent regulatory guidance, a lack of established market practice and/or data gaps or methodological challenges
54


affecting the ability to collect relevant data us and our portfolio companies may be required to engage third party advisors and/or service providers to fulfil the requirements, thereby exacerbating any increase in compliance burden and costs.
Appointed Representative Arrangements. Appointed representative arrangements are an area of increased regulatory focus in the United Kingdom. The FCA is reemphasizing the need for principals to take effective responsibility for, and have appropriate systems in place to adequately supervise, their appointed representatives. CECP is a principal firm that bears responsibility for CIC. On December 8, 2022, the FCA released updated rules (PS22/11) on appointed representatives which include more extensive obligations on principal firms. Working with external counsel, we are monitoring developments in this area to ensure CIC and CECP remain compliant.
Leveraged Transactions. In May 2017, the European Central Bank (“ECB”) issued guidance on leveraged transactions, which applies to significant credit institutions supervised by the ECB in member states of the Euro zone. Under the guidance, credit institutions should have in place internal policies that include a definition of “leveraged transactions.” Loans or credit exposures to a borrower should be regarded as leveraged transactions if: (i) the borrower’s post-financing level of leverage exceeds a total debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.0 times; or (ii) the borrower is owned by one or more “financial sponsors.” For these purposes, a financial sponsor is an investment firm that undertakes private equity investments in and/or leveraged buyouts of companies. Following these guidelines, credit institutions in the Eurozone could in the future limit, delay or restrict the availability of credit and/or increase the cost of credit for our investment funds or portfolio companies involved in leveraged transactions. This policy area remains under close scrutiny and further guidance could be issued on short notice in the future.
CSPD. In March 2018, the European Commission published a proposal for a new directive governing credit servicers, credit purchasers and the recovery of collateral in connection with loans (the “Credit Servicers and Purchasers Directive” or “CSPD”). The policy aim behind the CSPD is the development of a well-functioning secondary market for non-performing loans. The CSPD was finalized and published in the Official Journal of the European Union on December 8, 2021, and entered into force on December 28, 2021. Member States are required to adopt and apply measures implementing the CSPD by December 30, 2023, and entities carrying on credit servicing activities from December 30, 2023, will be required to obtain authorization under the CSPD by June 29, 2024.
The CSPD applies to, among others, “credit servicers” and “credit purchasers” and would impose a number of new requirements relating to licensing, conduct of business and provision of information. The definition of “credit servicer” in the Commission proposal is sufficiently broad that it could be construed to include asset managers. The Directive limits the scope of the requirements for credit servicers and credit purchasers to the servicing or purchasing of credit agreements originally issued by a credit institution established in the EU or its subsidiaries established in the EU. This is subject, however, to individual Member State discretion. Such Member States may choose to extend the CSPD requirements to credit agreements that are not issued by an EU credit institution. Subject to the aforementioned potential extension of scope by individual Member States, the servicing of loans originally advanced by credit funds (rather than, for example, an EU bank) will fall outside the scope of the CSPD. Asset managers are unlikely to act as principal credit purchasers. However, they may purchase in-scope credit agreements as agent on behalf of the funds or separately managed accounts for whom they are acting and therefore may in practice be required to discharge the associated obligations on behalf of underlying clients. Compliance with these rules could involve a material cost to our business.
Hong Kong Security Law. On June 30, 2020, the National People’s Congress of China passed a national security law (the “National Security Law”), which criminalizes certain offenses including secession, subversion of the Chinese government, terrorism and collusion with foreign entities. The National Security Law also applies to non-permanent residents. Although the extra-territorial reach of the National Security Law remains unclear, there is a risk that the application of the National Security Law to conduct outside Hong Kong by non-permanent residents of Hong Kong could limit the activities of or negatively affect us, our investment funds and/or portfolio companies. The National Security Law has been condemned by the United States, the United Kingdom and several EU countries. The United States and other countries may take action against China, its leaders and leaders of Hong Kong, which may include the imposition of sanctions. Escalation of tensions resulting from the National Security Law, including conflict between China and other countries, protests and other government measures, as well as other economic, social or political unrest in the future, could adversely impact the security and stability of the region and may have a material adverse effect on countries in which we, our investment funds and portfolio companies or any of their respective personnel or assets are located. In addition, any downturn in Hong Kong’s economy could adversely affect our financial statements and our investments, or could have a significant impact on the industries in which we participate, and may adversely affect our operations, our investment funds and portfolio companies, including the retention of investment and other key professionals located in Hong Kong.
55


Chinese Regulations. In August 2014, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”), the Chinese securities regulator, promulgated the Interim Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Private Investment Funds (the “CSRC Regulations”). The CSRC Regulations adopt a broad definition of private investment funds, including private equity funds. In accordance with the CSRC Regulations and other relevant PRC laws, regulations and authorizations, the CSRC has become the principal regulator of private equity funds in China. In December 2020, the CSRC further promulgated Several Provisions on Strengthening the Regulation of Private Investment Funds, pursuant to which the CSRC strengthened its regulations on private investment funds and private investment fund managers. CSRC has designated the Asset Management Association of China (the “AMAC”), an industry body, with responsibility to introduce and promote regulations toward a degree of self-regulation across private equity funds in China. In recent years, regulations, directives and guidelines from the AMAC have continued to regulate private investment funds incorporated in China. For example, the AMAC has issued “Guidelines for Internal Control of Privately-raised Investment Fund Managers(February 2016), “Administrative Measures for Information Disclosure of Privately-raised Investment Fund” (February 2016), “Announcement on Further Regulating Relevant Matters Concerning the Registration of the Managers of the Privately-Raised Funds(February 2016), “Measures for the Administration of Private Placement of Private Investment Funds” (April 2016), “Private Equity Fund Contract Guidelines No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 (April 2016), “Administrative Measures for Private Investment Fund Services” (March 2017), “Implementing Guidelines on the Administration of Investor Suitability for Fund Raising Institutions(July 2017), “Guidelines on the Valuation of the Private Equity Investments of Privately-raised Investment Funds (for Trial Implementation)” (July 2018), “Guidelines on the Name of Privately-raised Investment Funds” (November 2018), “Notice on Privately-raised Fund Manager Registration” (December 2018), “Notice on Privately-raised Investment Fund Filing” (December 2019), “Notice on Facilitating the Application of Privately-raised Fund Manager Registration” (February 2020), and “Notice on Strengthening the Self-Regulatory Management of Privately-raised Fund Information Submission and Optimizing Industry Services” (February 2021), in addition to the regulations and directives from the CSRC and the AMAC.
If a private equity fund wishes to accept capital contributions from a PRC governmental body or authority, then that fund will also need to subject itself (including specific conditions as regards the general partner and/or the private investment fund manager) to the supervision of the National Development and Reform Commission (the “NDRC”). If a private equity fund wishes to accept capital contributions from a PRC insurance company, then that fund will also need to subject itself (including specific conditions as regards the general partner and/or the private investment fund manager) to the supervision of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (the “CBIRC”). In accordance with the NDRC’s regulations on governmental fund of funds’ participation in equity investment funds, and/or the CBIRC’s regulations on insurance companies, the private investment fund is subject to requirements relating to the industry focus, investment scope, investment restrictions, risk control and information disclosure. The general partner and/or the private investment fund manager are also subject to additional restrictions and qualification requirements and are required to fulfill reporting and filing obligations to the NDRC and/or the CBIRC (in addition to any reporting or filing obligations to the CSRC, the AMAC, local financial bureaus or others). These regulations may have an adverse effect on us and/or our renminbi (RMB)-denominated investment funds by, among other things, increasing the regulatory burden and costs of raising money for RMB-denominated investment funds if we admit investors that are regulated by the above regulators.
Data Privacy. Many foreign countries and governmental bodies, including the European Union and other relevant jurisdictions where Carlyle and our portfolio companies conduct business, have laws and regulations concerning the collection and use of PII and other data obtained from their residents or by businesses operating within their jurisdiction that are more restrictive than, and could in some cases conflict with, those in the United States. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, and data security worldwide may limit the use and adoption of our services and adversely affect our business” for more information.
Other Similar Measures. Our investment businesses are subject to risk that similar measures might be introduced in other countries in which our investment funds currently have investments or plan to invest in the future, or that other legislative or regulatory measures that negatively affect their respective portfolio investments might be promulgated in any of the countries in which they invest. The reporting related to such initiatives may divert the attention of our personnel and the management teams of our portfolio companies. Moreover, sensitive business information relating to us or our portfolio companies could be publicly released.
See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the United States” and Item 1 “Business—Regulatory and Compliance Matters” for more information.
56


Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders on ESG matters, including our ESG reporting, exposes us to reputational and other risks.
We, our funds and their portfolio companies face increasing public scrutiny related to ESG activities as well as ESG policies, processes and/or performance, including from fund investors, stockholders, regulators and other stakeholders. We and they risk damage to our brand and reputation, if we or they fail or are perceived to have failed to act responsibly in a number of areas, such as diversity, equity and inclusion, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency and considering ESG factors in our investment processes. In addition, different stakeholder groups have divergent views on ESG matters, including in the countries in which we operate and invest, as well as states and localities where we serve public sector clients. This divergence increases the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to ESG matters will be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders and adversely impact our reputation and business. If we do not successfully manage ESG-related expectations across the varied interests of our stakeholders, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, and constrain our investment opportunities. Adverse incidents with respect to ESG activities or ESG policies, processes and/or performance, including any statements regarding the investment strategies of our funds or our funds’ ESG efforts or initiatives that are or are perceived to be inaccurate or misleading, could impact the value of our brand, or the brands of our funds or their portfolio companies, the cost of our or their operations and relationships with investors, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In particular, there has been significant negative publicity and investor and regulatory focus on the phenomenon of “greenwashing” (i.e., making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding the sustainability or ESG-related characteristics of a product, business, or business practice). We could suffer significant reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny if we are subject to “greenwashing” accusations, including with respect to statements regarding the investment strategies of our funds or the ESG efforts and initiatives of us, our funds and our portfolio companies. Such accusations could also result in litigation and adversely impact our ability to raise capital and attract new investors.
Although we consider application of our ESG strategy to be an opportunity to enhance or protect the performance of our investments over the long-term, we cannot guarantee that our ESG strategy, which depends in part on qualitative judgments, will positively impact the financial or ESG performance of any individual investment or our funds as a whole. Similarly, to the extent we or a third-party ESG advisor engages with portfolio companies on ESG-related practices and potential enhancements thereto, there is no guarantee that such engagements will improve the long-term value of the investment. Successful engagement efforts on the part of us or a third-party ESG advisor will depend on our or any such third-party advisor’s ability to identify and analyze material ESG and other factors and their value, and there can be no assurance that the strategy or techniques employed will be successful.In addition, our ESG strategy, including the ESG strategy and associated procedures and practices, is expected to change over time.
We and many of our portfolio companies undertake voluntary reporting on various ESG matters, including, for example, greenhouse gas emissions, supply chain practices, and human capital management. The standards for tracking and reporting on ESG matters are relatively new, have not been harmonized, and continue to evolve and we may fail to successfully implement or comply with these rapidly developing ESG standards and requirements. Moreover, in conducting ESG reporting, we may seek to align with particular disclosure frameworks and/or reporting standards, which are evolving. Our selection of disclosure frameworks and reporting standards, may change from time to time and may result in a lack of consistent or meaningful comparative data from period to period, as well as significant revisions to ESG goals, initiatives, commitments, or objectives or reported progress in achieving the same. Due to the lack of a single, comprehensive ESG strategy that is utilized across all asset managers, we and our portfolio companies may utilize a combination of frameworks, or develop proprietary frameworks where necessary and relevant. In addition, we and our portfolio companies’ selection of reporting frameworks or standards, and other methodological choices, such as the use of certain performance metrics, levels of quantification, value chain reporting, or materiality standards, may vary over time and may not always align with evolving investor and activist expectations or market practices. We and our portfolio companies may suffer reputational damage if our or their ESG disclosure is viewed as falling short of best practices, or if such reporting indicates ESG performance that does not meet investor, activist, employee, customer, or other stakeholder expectations. With respect to both voluntary and mandated ESG disclosures, we and our portfolio companies may not successfully implement measurement processes and disclosure controls and procedures that meet evolving investor, activist, or regulatory expectations. In addition, enhancements to such processes and controls may be costly and give rise to significant administrative burdens. For example, collecting, measuring, and reporting ESG information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming, is subject to evolving reporting standards, and can present numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. If we or our portfolio companies do not successfully implement controls related to reporting ESG information, this could result in legal liability and reputational damage, which could impact our ability to attract and retain investors and employees.
57


It is unclear what impact the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union will have on the Company or the fund portfolio companies.
The UK held a referendum in June 2016 on whether to remain a member state of the EU, in which a majority of voters voted to leave the EU. The UK officially left the EU on January 31, 2020, and a transition period of 11 months commenced on this date to allow for the negotiation of a new trade agreement. This transition period ended on December 31, 2020. Various EU laws have been adopted into domestic UK legislation and certain transitional regimes and deficiency-correction powers exist to ease the transition.
The UK and the EU announced, on December 24, 2020, that they had reached agreement on a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement (the “TCA”), which addresses the future relationship between the parties. The TCA was approved by the UK Parliament on December 30, 2020. Due to the TCA only being agreed shortly before the end of the transition period, it applied on a provisional basis in the EU until it was formally ratified by the European Parliament and has applied permanently from May 1, 2021. The TCA covers, for example, measures to preserve tariff-free trade in goods and the ability of UK nationals to travel to the EU on business but defers other issues. While the TCA includes a commitment by the UK and the EU to keep their markets open for persons wishing to provide financial services through a permanent establishment, it does not substantively address future cooperation in the financial services sector or reciprocal market access into the EU by UK-based firms under equivalence arrangements or otherwise.
While the TCA provides clarity in some areas, the impact of Brexit on our business operations in the UK and the EU, and on the private investment funds industry and global financial markets more broadly, remains uncertain. This is driven in part by the ongoing uncertainty relating to equivalence and the extent to which the EU will grant reciprocal access to UK firms in the financial services sector. As a new agreement, the implications and operation of the TCA may also be subject to change and/or develop at short notice.
As of January 1, 2021, our UK FCA-authorized affiliates, CECP and CELF, ceased to be entitled to exercise single market passport rights to provide investment services in or into the EEA on a cross-border services basis. In addition, Abingworth is no longer able to exercise a single market passport to market its funds in the EEA. Certain EEA investor-facing activities previously carried on by CECP and CELF have been reorganized so that they are performed now by different, EEA established affiliates under alternative licensing arrangements. We also may continue to make changes to the arrangements in the future. These arrangements may subject us to additional regulatory obligations and may impede our ability to raise capital from EEA investors.
In this respect and otherwise, uncertainty about the way in which these and other complex issues will be resolved could adversely affect us, our investment funds and portfolio companies (especially if our investment funds include, or expose them to, businesses that depend on access to the single market, the customs union, or whose value is affected adversely by the UK’s future relationship with the EU). The size and importance of the UK’s economy, coupled with uncertainty or unpredictability about the precise nature of its future legal, political and economic relationship with the EU following the implementation of the TCA (and any subsequent discussions between the UK and EU in respect of matters not within its scope) may continue to cause instability, significant currency fluctuations and/or other adverse effects on international markets, international trade agreements and/or other existing cross-border cooperation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory or otherwise). In addition, Brexit could have a destabilizing effect if any other member states were to consider withdrawing from the EU. The decision for any other member state to withdraw from the EU could exacerbate such uncertainty and instability and may present similar and/or additional potential risks and consequences for us, our investment funds and fund portfolio companies.
These complex issues and other by-products of Brexit, such as the tightening of credit in the UK commercial real estate market, may also increase the costs of having operations, conducting business and making investments in the UK and Europe. As a result, the performance of our funds that are focused on investing in the UK and to a lesser extent across Europe, may be disproportionately affected compared to those funds that invest more broadly across global geographies or are focused on different regions.
The uncertainty surrounding the precise nature of the UK’s future legal relationship with the EU may continue to be a source of significant exchange rate fluctuations and/or other adverse effects on international markets. Unhedged currency fluctuations have the ability to adversely affect our funds and their underlying portfolio companies.
Moreover, the development of the UK’s future legislative approach remains uncertain. The UK may elect in the future to repeal, amend or replace EU laws, which could exacerbate the uncertainty and result in divergent UK national laws and
58


regulations. Changes to the regulatory regimes in the UK or the EU and its member states could materially affect our business prospects and opportunities and increase our costs. In addition, Brexit could potentially disrupt the tax jurisdictions in which we operate and affect the tax benefits or liabilities in these or other jurisdictions in a manner that is adverse to us and/or our funds. Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, such as SOFR, may adversely affect our credit arrangements and our collateralized loan obligation transactions.
LIBOR and certain other “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms have resulted in plans to phase out and eventually replace LIBOR, which may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences that cannot be predicted.
Since January 1, 2022, U.S. banks have not been allowed to issue any new debt tied to LIBOR, which will cease to be published at the end of June 2023. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, formally recommended SOFR as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. While we have seen an increase in market acceptance of SOFR, there is no guarantee that this trend will continue.
To address the transition away from LIBOR, we have amended our credit agreements and related loan documentation to provide for an agreed upon methodology, such as SOFR, to calculate new benchmark rate spreads. In April 2022, for example, we amended our revolving facility to reference SOFR, among other changes in terms. We have evaluated and continue to evaluate our CLOs to identify any discrepancy between the interest rate an issuer pays on its liabilities compared to the interest rate on the underlying assets, or the amounts payable under a derivative used to hedge its currency or interest rate exposure. For our more recent generation of CLOs, we have incorporated provisions to address the transition from LIBOR; however, certain older CLOs have not yet come up for amendment or refinancing and as such may not currently contain clear LIBOR transition procedures. In January 2022, for example, we priced our first CLO to SOFR. As the market fully transitions from LIBOR, we expect that there will be short-term rate mismatches, which could adversely impact the returns on our CLOs.
If the transition from LIBOR results in an overall increase to borrowing costs, higher interest expense could negatively affect the financial results and valuations of our funds’ portfolio companies. There is no guarantee that a transition from LIBOR to an alternative, such as SOFR, will not result in financial market disruptions, significant increases or volatility in risk-free benchmark rates, or borrowing costs to borrowers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, result of operations, financial condition, and share price.
We are subject to substantial litigation risks and may face significant liabilities and damage to our professional reputation as a result of litigation allegations and negative publicity.
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to the risk of substantial litigation and face significant regulatory oversight. In recent years, the volume of claims and the amount of potential damages claimed in such proceedings against the financial services industry have generally been increasing. The investment decisions we make in our asset management business and the activities of our investment professionals on behalf of portfolio companies of our carry funds may subject them and us to the risk of third-party litigation arising from investor dissatisfaction with the performance of those investment funds, alleged conflicts of interest, the activities of our portfolio companies and a variety of other litigation claims and regulatory inquiries and actions. From time to time, we and our portfolio companies have been and may be subject to regulatory actions and shareholder class action suits relating to transactions in which we have agreed to acquire public companies.
To the extent that investors in our investment funds suffer losses resulting from fraud, gross negligence, willful misconduct or other similar misconduct, investors may have remedies against us, our investment funds, our principals or our affiliates. Heightened standards of care or additional fiduciary duties may apply in certain of our managed accounts or other advisory contracts. To the extent we enter into agreements with clients containing such terms or applicable law mandates a heightened standard of care or duties, we could, for example, be liable to certain clients for acts of simple negligence or breach of such duties, which might include the allocation of a client’s funds to our affiliated funds. Even in the absence of misconduct, we may be exposed to litigation or other adverse consequences where investments perform poorly and investors in or alongside our funds experience losses. The general partners and investment advisers to our investment funds, including their directors, officers, other employees and affiliates, are generally indemnified by our funds with respect to their conduct in connection with the management of the business and affairs of our investment funds. If a particular fund has an indemnification obligation to us, but such fund’s assets have been depleted or distributed to the relevant fund investors, such fund may have insufficient assets to cover its indemnification obligation and the Company could suffer financial losses.
59


Defending against litigation could be costly. Such litigation costs may not be recoverable from insurance or other indemnification. Carlyle has previously recovered significant amounts of insurance proceeds. As a general matter, we expect that the cost of insurance will increase significantly, and we do not believe we will recover the same amount of insurance proceeds as we have in prior years. Further, we note that in connection with the prohibited activities rule under the SEC Proposed Rule discussed above, if such rule were to be enacted, it could substantially increase our exposure to litigation generally, including by way of a simple negligence standard as opposed to a gross negligence standard.
The laws and regulations governing the limited liability of such issuers and portfolio companies vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and in certain contexts the laws of certain jurisdictions may provide not only for carve-outs from limited liability protection for the issuer or portfolio company that has incurred the liabilities, but also for recourse to assets of other entities under common control with, or that are part of the same economic group as, such issuer. For example, if one of our portfolio companies is subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings in a jurisdiction and is found to have liabilities under the local consumer protection, labor, tax or bankruptcy laws, the laws of that jurisdiction may permit authorities or creditors to file a lien on, or to otherwise have recourse to, assets held by other portfolio companies (including the Company) in that jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be adversely affected as a result of the foregoing risks.
If any litigation or regulatory actions were brought against us and resulted in a finding of substantial legal liability, the lawsuit could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could materially impact our business. Recently, there has been an elevated level of focus put on our industry and companies in which our funds are invested, including increased focus on externalities of business activities such as ESG considerations. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties.” We depend to a large extent on our business relationships and our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our funds. As a result, allegations of improper conduct by private litigants (including investors in or alongside our funds), regulators or employees, whether the ultimate outcome is favorable or unfavorable to us, as well as negative publicity and press speculation about us, our investment activities, the private equity industry in general or our workplace, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation, which may be more damaging to our business than to other types of businesses.
In addition, with a workforce composed of many highly paid professionals, we face the risk of litigation relating to claims for compensation, which may, individually or in the aggregate, be significant in amount. The cost of settling any such claims could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our affiliated subsidiaries serve as the general partners of many of our managed funds and could have liability for certain fund obligations.
Our affiliated subsidiaries serve as a general partner of many of our funds. As such, under applicable law and the fund partnership agreements, our subsidiaries could have liability for obligations of our funds if such funds have insufficient assets to pay such obligations themselves, including contractual obligations, obligations to repay fund indebtedness, uninsured contingent obligations for litigation damages awards or taxes determined to be owed by the funds. In general, the funds indemnify us for such obligations; but if the relevant funds’ assets have been depleted or distributed to fund investors, such fund may be unable to pay such indemnification obligation to us, and we could suffer significant loss and expense.
Employee misconduct or fraud could harm us and subject us to significant legal liability and reputational harm, which could impair our ability to attract and retain investors in our funds. Fraud, other deceptive practices or other misconduct at our portfolio companies could similarly subject us to liability and reputational damage and also harm performance.
There have been a number of highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the financial services industry in recent years, and there is a risk that our employees or advisors could engage in misconduct or fraud that adversely affects our business. Misconduct or fraud by employees, advisors or other third-party service providers could cause significant losses. Employee misconduct or fraud could include, among other things, binding the Company to transactions that exceed authorized limits or present unacceptable risks and other unauthorized activities or concealing unsuccessful investments (which, in either case, may result in unknown and unmanaged risks or losses), or otherwise charging (or seeking to charge) inappropriate expenses or engaging in inappropriate or unlawful behavior or actions directed toward other employees. It is not always possible to deter misconduct or fraud by employees or service providers, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. In the current hybrid work environment we may have less of an ability to supervise our employees, which could expose us to an enhanced risk of misconduct or fraud.
60


Our ability to attract and retain investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our investment funds depends heavily upon the reputation of our professionals, especially our senior Carlyle professionals. Because of our diverse business and the regulatory regimes under which we operate, we are subject to a number of obligations and standards (and related policies and procedures) arising from our asset management business and our authority over the assets managed by our asset management business. The violation of these obligations and standards (and related policies and procedures) by any of our employees would adversely affect us and our investment funds and investors. For example, we could lose our ability to raise new investment funds if any of our “covered persons” is the subject of a criminal, regulatory or court order or other disqualifying event. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Extensive regulation in the United States and abroad affects our activities, increases the cost of doing business and creates the potential for significant liabilities and penalties.” In addition, in certain jurisdictions, we may be liable for certain social media statements made by our employees. For example, any statements an employee makes online in a personal capacity (whether or not such employee identifies online as an employee of the Company) could still be attributed to Carlyle under certain regulations. Expressing personal views in a way that implies corporate endorsement could create misunderstandings and have adverse consequences for us and our employees.
Our business often requires that we deal with confidential matters of great significance to companies in which our investment funds may invest. If our employees, advisors or other third-party service providers were to use or disclose confidential information improperly, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position and current and future business relationships, as well as face potentially significant litigation. It is not always possible to detect or deter employee misconduct or fraud, including financial fraud, the misappropriation of funds of our business or our investment funds or inappropriate or unlawful behavior or actions directed toward other employees, and the extensive precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. If any of our employees were to engage in misconduct or fraud or were to be accused of such misconduct or fraud, whether or not substantiated, our business and our reputation could be adversely affected and a loss of investor confidence could result, which would adversely impact our ability to raise future funds.
In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) and the SEC have devoted greater resources to enforcement of the FCPA. In addition, the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions have significantly expanded the reach of their anti-bribery laws. While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our personnel with the FCPA and the UK anti-bribery laws, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances to prevent violations. Any determination that we have violated the FCPA, the UK anti-bribery laws or other applicable anticorruption laws could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects, financial position or the market value of our common stock.
In addition, we will also be adversely affected if there is fraud, other deceptive practices or other misconduct by personnel of the portfolio companies in which our funds invest, including such activities that predate our acquisition of the portfolio company. For example, improper or illegal conduct by personnel at our portfolio companies or failure by such personnel to comply with anti-bribery, trade sanctions, anti-harassment, legal and regulatory requirements could adversely affect our business and reputation. Such misconduct or fraud could also undermine any due diligence efforts with respect to such companies and could negatively affect the valuation of a fund’s investments.
Certain policies and procedures implemented to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and address certain regulatory requirements may reduce the synergies across our various businesses and inhibit our ability to maintain our collaborative culture.
We consider our “One Carlyle” philosophy and the ability of our professionals to communicate and collaborate across funds, industries and geographies one of our significant competitive strengths. As a result of the expansion of our platform into various lines of business in the asset management industry, our acquisition of new businesses, and the growth of our managed account business, we are subject to a number of actual and potential conflicts of interest and subject to greater regulatory oversight than that to which we would otherwise be subject if we had just one line of business. For example, certain regulatory requirements mandate us to restrict access by certain personnel in our funds to information about certain transactions or investments being considered or made by those funds. In addition, as we continue to expand our platform, the allocation of investment opportunities among our investment funds is expected to become more complex. In addressing these conflicts and regulatory requirements across our various businesses, we have and may continue to implement certain policies and procedures, such as information barriers. As a practical matter, the establishment and maintenance of such information barriers means that collaboration between our investment professionals across various platforms or with respect to certain investments may be limited, reducing potential synergies that we cultivate across these businesses through our “One Carlyle” approach. For example, although we maintain ultimate control over the Global Investment Solutions segment’s constituent firm, AlpInvest, we have erected an information barrier between the management teams at AlpInvest and the rest of Carlyle. See “Risks Related
61


to Our Business Operations—Industry Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our Global Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks.” In addition, we may come into possession of material, non-public information with respect to issuers in which we may be considering making an investment. Consequently, we may be precluded from providing such information or other ideas to our other businesses that could benefit from such information.
Our failure to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest in our investment business could damage our reputation and adversely affect our businesses.
As we have expanded and as we continue to expand the number and scope of our businesses, we increasingly confront potential conflicts of interest relating to our funds’ investment activities. For example, a decision to acquire material, non-public information about a company while pursuing an investment opportunity for a particular fund may give rise to a potential conflict of interest that results in our having to restrict the ability of other funds to take any action. Certain of our funds, managed accounts or investment vehicles may have overlapping investment objectives, including co-investment funds and funds that have different fee structures, and potential conflicts may arise with respect to our decisions regarding how to allocate investment opportunities among those funds, managed accounts or investors. For example, different funds may invest in a single company where the fund that made the initial investment no longer has capital available to invest or a follow-on opportunity arises. We may also cause different funds that we manage to purchase different classes of debt or securities in the same portfolio company. For example, one of our funds could acquire a debt security or bank loan issued by the same company in which one of our buyout funds owns common equity securities or several of our funds could be invested in different tranches of a company’s debt. A direct conflict of interest could arise between and among the debt holders and the equity holders if such a portfolio company was to develop insolvency concerns, and that conflict would have to be carefully managed by us. It is also possible that in the event the company goes through a bankruptcy proceeding, the interests of the fund holding the debt securities or loans may be subordinated, recharacterized or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of the involvement and actions of the fund holding the equity in the portfolio company. In such a case, the debt security or loan could be converted into equity and the prospects of repayment greatly diminished. Conflicts of interest may also exist in the valuation of our investments and regarding decisions about the allocation of specific investment opportunities among us and our funds and the allocation of fees and costs among us, our investment funds and their portfolio companies and conflicts could also arise in respect of the ultimate disposition of such investments. Due to changes in the tax treatment of carried interest under the TCJA and/or future legislation, conflicts of interest may arise with investors in certain of our funds in connection with the general partner’s decisions with respect to the sequence and timing of disposals of investments in such funds. To the extent we fail to appropriately deal with any such conflicts, it could negatively impact our reputation and ability to raise additional funds and the willingness of counterparties to do business with us or result in regulatory liability or potential litigation against us.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations
Risks Related to the Assets We Manage
The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive.
The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to investors, investor liquidity and willingness to invest, fund terms (including fees), brand recognition, types of products offered, consideration of ESG issues and business reputation. Our investment business, as well as our investment funds, competes with a number of private equity funds, specialized investment funds, hedge funds, corporate buyers, traditional asset managers, real estate development companies, commercial banks, investment banks and other financial institutions (as well as sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors).
In addition, developments in financial technology (or fintech), such as a distributed ledger technology (or blockchain), have the potential to disrupt the financial industry and change the way financial institutions, as well as asset managers, do business. Several factors, among others, serve to increase our competitive risks:
a number of our competitors in some of our businesses have greater financial, fundraising, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;
some of our funds may not perform as well as competitors’ funds or other available investment products;
62


fund investors may reduce their investments in our funds or decrease their allocations in new funds based on a variety of factors, such as the occurrence of an economic downturn, their available capital, regulatory requirements, a desire to consolidate their relationships with investment firms or other considerations;
several of our competitors have significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities and may reduce the size and duration of pricing inefficiencies that otherwise could be exploited;
some of these competitors (including strategic competitors) may also have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for our funds with respect to investment opportunities;
some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds than us, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and to bid more aggressively or more quickly than us for investments that we want to make;
some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation and accordingly may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do and/or bear less compliance expense than us;
some of our competitors may have more flexibility than us in raising certain types of investment funds under the investment management contracts they have negotiated with their investors;
some of our competitors may be more successful than us in development of new products to address investor demand for new or different investment strategies and/or regulatory changes, including with respect to products with mandates that incorporate ESG considerations, or products that are targeted toward retail or insurance capital;
some of our competitors may have better expertise or be regarded by investors as having better expertise in a specific asset class or geographic region than we do;
our competitors that are corporate buyers may be able to achieve synergistic cost savings in respect of an investment, which may provide them with a competitive advantage in bidding for an investment;
our competitors have instituted or may institute low cost, high speed financial applications and services based on artificial intelligence and new competitors may enter the asset management space using new investment platforms based on artificial intelligence;
special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) may continue to compete with our funds for investment opportunities and drive up asset prices;
there are relatively few barriers to entry impeding the formation of new investment firms, and the successful efforts of new entrants into our various businesses, including former “star” portfolio managers at large diversified financial institutions as well as such institutions themselves, is expected to continue to result in increased competition;
some investors may prefer to pursue investments directly instead of investing through one of our funds;
some investors may prefer to invest with an asset manager that is not publicly traded or is smaller with only one or two investment products that it manages; and
other industry participants may, from time to time, seek to recruit our investment professionals and other employees away from us.
We may lose investment opportunities in the future if we do not match investment prices, structures, products or terms offered by our competitors. Alternatively, we may experience decreased rates of return and increased risks of loss if we match investment prices, structures and terms offered by our competitors. Moreover, if we are forced to compete with other asset managers on the basis of price, we may not be able to maintain our current fund fee and carried interest terms. We have
63


historically competed primarily on the performance of our funds, and not on the level of our fees or carried interest relative to those of our competitors. However, there is a risk that fees and carried interest in the asset management industry will decline, without regard to the historical performance of a manager. Fee or carried interest income reductions on existing or future funds, without corresponding decreases in our cost structure, would adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
The attractiveness of our investment funds relative to investments in other investment products could decrease depending on economic conditions. In addition, to the extent that any changes in tax law make debt financing less attractive to certain categories of borrowers, this could adversely affect the investment opportunities for our credit-focused funds. Such competitive pressure could adversely affect our ability to make successful investments and limit our ability to raise future investment funds, either of which would adversely impact our business, revenue, results of operations and cash flow. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
Poor performance of our investment funds would cause a decline in our revenue, income and cash flow, may obligate us to repay carried interest previously paid to us, and could adversely affect our ability to raise capital for future investment funds.
In the event that any of our investment funds were to perform poorly, our revenue, income and cash flow could decline. Investors could also demand lower fees or fee concessions for existing or future funds, which would likewise decrease our revenue or require us to record an impairment of intangible assets and/or goodwill in the case of an acquired business. In some of our funds, such as our carry funds, a reduction in the value of the portfolio investments held in such funds could result in a reduction in the carried interest we earn or in our management fees. In our CLOs, defaults or downgrades of the CLOs’ underlying collateral obligations could cause failures of certain over collateralization tests and the potential for insufficient funds to pay expected management fees on any such CLO, which would result in either a temporary deferral or permanent loss of such management fees. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Industry Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our CLO business and investment into CLOs involves certain risks.”
We also could experience losses on our investment of our own capital into our funds as a result of poor performance by our investment funds. If, as a result of poor performance of later investments in a carry fund’s life, the fund does not achieve certain investment returns for the fund over its life, we will be obligated to repay the amount by which carried interest that was previously distributed to us exceeds the amount to which we are ultimately entitled. These repayment obligations may be related to amounts previously distributed to our senior Carlyle professionals prior to the completion of our initial public offering, with respect to which our unitholdersstockholders did not receive any benefit. See “—“Risks Related to Our Business Operations— Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—We may need to pay “giveback” obligations if and when they are triggered under the governing agreements with our investors” and Note 1110 to ourthe consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Poor performance of our investment funds may also make it more difficult for us to raise new capital. Investors in our funds mightmay decline to invest in future investment funds we raise. Investors and potential investors in our funds continually assess our investment funds’ performance, and our ability to raise capital for existing and future investment funds and avoid excessive redemption levels will depend on our investment funds’ continued satisfactory performance. Accordingly, poor fund performance may deter future investment in our funds and thereby decrease the capital invested in our funds and ultimately, our management fee income.
The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common stock.
    We have presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K information relating to the historical performance of our investment funds. The historical and potential future returns of the investment funds that we advise, however, are not directly linked to returns in our common stock. Therefore, any continued positive performance of the investment funds that we advise will not necessarily result in positive returns on an investment in our common stock. However, poor performance of the investment funds that we advise would cause a decline in our revenue from such investment funds, and could therefore have a negative effect on our performance, our ability to raise future funds and in all likelihood the returns on an investment in our common stock.

64


Moreover, with respect to the historical returns of our investment funds:
our historical returns derive largely from the performance of our existing funds, and we may create new funds in the future that reflect a different asset mix and different investment strategies, as well as a varied geographic and industry exposure as compared to our present funds, and any such new funds could have lower returns than our existing or previous funds;
the performance of our carry funds reflects our valuation of the unrealized investments held in those funds using assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, but the actual realized return on these investments will depend on, among other factors, future operating results and the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition all of which may differ from the assumptions on which the valuations in our historical returns are based, which may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from those unrealized investments;
in recent years, there has been increased competition for private equity investment opportunities resulting from the increased amount of capital invested in alternative investment funds, high liquidity in debt markets and strong equity markets, and the increased competition for investments may reduce our returns in the future;
the rates of returns of some of our funds in certain years have been positively influenced by a number of investments that experienced rapid and substantial increases in value following the dates on which those investments were made, which may not occur with respect to future investments;
our investment funds’ returns in some years have benefited from investment opportunities and general market conditions, including lower interest rates and rates of inflation than present market conditions, that may have been significantly more favorable for generating positive performance than current market conditions or market conditions that we may experience in the future and may not repeat themselves;
our current or future investment funds might not be able to avail themselves of comparable investment opportunities or market conditions, and the circumstances under which our funds may make future investments may differ significantly from those conditions prevailing in the past;
newly-established funds may generate lower returns during the period that they take to deploy their capital; and
the introduction of fund-level leverage in more recent funds has increased the rates of returns in those funds compared to what they would have been without the use of such leverage.
Our recent performance has benefited from recent high multiples and asset prices. In the current market environment, we expect that earning such returns on new investments will be much more difficult than in the past and the future internal rate of return for any current or future fund may vary considerably from the historical internal rate of return generated by any particular fund or for our funds as a whole. Future returns will also be affected by the risks described elsewhere in this report, including risks of the industries and businesses in which a particular fund invests. See Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Segment Analysis—Fund Performance Metrics” for additional information.
Risk management activities may adversely affect the return on our and our funds’ investments.
When managing our exposure to market risks, we may (on our own behalf or on behalf of our funds) from time to time use forward contracts, options, swaps, caps, collars and floors or pursue other strategies or use other forms of derivative instruments to limit our exposure to changes in the relative values of investments that may result from market developments, including changes in prevailing interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The scope of risk management activities undertaken by us varies based on the level and volatility of interest rates, prevailing foreign currency exchange rates, the types of investments that are made and other changing market conditions. The use of hedging transactions and other derivative instruments to reduce the effects of a decline in the value of a position does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the value of the position or prevent losses if the value of the position declines. Such transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the value of a position increases. Moreover, it may not be possible to limit the exposure to a market development that is so generally anticipated that a hedging or other derivative transaction cannot be entered into at an
65


acceptable price. Currency fluctuations, in particular, can have a substantial effect on our cash flow and financial condition. The success of any hedging or other derivative transaction generally will depend on our ability to correctly predict market changes, the degree of correlation between price movements of a derivative instrument and the position being hedged, the creditworthiness of the counterparty and other factors. As a result, while we may enter into such a transaction in order to reduce our exposure to market risks, the transaction may result in poorer overall firm or investment performance than if it had not been executed. Such transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the value of a hedged position increases.
    While such hedging arrangements may reduce certain risks, such arrangements themselves may entail certain other risks. These arrangements may require the posting of cash collateral at a time when a fund has insufficient cash or illiquid assets such that the posting of the cash is either impossible or requires the sale of assets at prices that do not reflect their underlying value. Moreover, these hedging arrangements may generate significant transaction costs, including potential tax costs, which may reduce the returns generated by the firm or a fund. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Changing regulations regarding derivatives and commodity interest transactions could adversely impact various aspects of our business.”
Ongoing trade negotiations and potential for further regulatory reform may create regulatory uncertainty for our portfolio companies and our investment strategies and adversely affect the profitability of our portfolio companies.
    Since March 2018, the United States has imposed, or threatened to impose, a series of various tariffs on a variety of goods imported into the United States, with an emphasis on those imported from China and the EU. These new tariffs, or other changes in U.S. trade policy, have resulted in, and may continue to trigger, retaliatory actions by affected countries, particularly China. In October 2022, the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) announced the public comment phase of its four-year, statutorily mandated review of the China Section 301 tariffs. Following the announcement, the USTR solicited additional information from interested parties in regard to their investigation. However, it is unclear if any tariffs will be removed, modified, or increased as a result of the investigation.
The U.S. government has also implemented and expanded a number of economic sanctions programs and export controls that target Chinese entities and nationals on national security grounds, and has imposed restrictions on our ability to acquire and retain interests in the securities of certain Chinese entities.These initiatives target, for example, China’s response to political demonstrations in Hong Kong, China’s conduct concerning the treatment of Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in its Xinjiang province, and certain Chinese entities designated by the U.S. government as Communist Chinese military companies, among other things.
Geopolitical tensions globally remain elevated and further changes to foreign direct investment laws remain possible. The U.S. government is advancing plans to create an outbound investment screening regime to prevent U.S. capital from contributing to the development of force-multiplying technologies in certain jurisdictions, such as China. The concern among policymakers is that U.S. investment, particularly in China, facilitates the transfer or buildup of technology and know-how that could strengthen another country’s civil and military capabilities to the detriment of the United States. Another major concern is U.S. supply chain security—the ability to ensure access to critical goods and services in the face of disruptions arising from conflict, economic coercion, or natural disasters. An outbound investment screening could, depending upon scope, limit our ability to make certain investments without obtaining U.S. government approval. Furthermore, foreign direct investment laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions can also require approvals, which can delay the investment or divestment of assets in a fund.
    Any governmental action, including such actions noted above, has the potential to increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of companies whose businesses rely on goods imported from or exported to any country impacted by such policies. In addition, these actions may adversely affect our suppliers and certain other customers of our portfolio companies, which could amplify the negative impact on our operating results or future cash flows.
Our asset management business depends in large part on our ability to raise capital from third-party investors. If we are unable to raise capital from third-party investors, we would be unable to collect management fees or deploy their capital into investments and potentially collect carried interest, which would materially reduce our revenue and cash flow and adversely affect our financial condition.
In 2016, we commenced a four-year fundraising cycle during which we are targeting to raise approximately $100We raised $81.2 billion in new capital commitments across 2021 and 2022, with 2022 fundraising being driven by the end of 2019. Through December 31, 2017, we have raised more than $57$2.0 billion in gross newadditional third-party capital commitments. raised for our strategic investment in Fortitude, fundraising on our CLO Platform and our retail credit product (CTAC) and the launch of our third Credit Opportunities fund, within our Global Credit segment, and coupled with fundraising for our Global Private Equity and Global Investment Solutions funds. We cannot assure that our prior success in raising capital will continue in the future. In this respect, we anticipate the fundraising landscape will continue
66


to be increasingly competitive as the pace of capital deployment across the industry has resulted in fund products coming back to market faster and with larger target fund sizes than with prior vintages, and limited partners are reassessing their portfolio allocation targets in light of market volatility and their liquidity requirements. As a result, fundraising in certain products—particularly in corporate private equity strategies—may take longer to complete and fund sizes may not meet levels they otherwise would in a more favorable market environment. Slowdowns in fundraising may also delay catch-up management fees that would be charged to fund investors in subsequent closings and smaller fund sizes could result in lower management fees in the future.
Our ability to raise this capital from third-party investors depends on a number of factors, including certain factors that are outside our control. Certain of these factors such as the performance of the stock market, the pace of distributions from our funds and from the funds of other asset managers or the asset allocation rules or regulations or investment policies to which such third-party investors are subject, whether by their own policy or the laws and regulations of their respective jurisdictions, could inhibit or restrict the ability of third-party investors to make investments in our investment funds. For example, state politicians and lawmakers across a number of states, including Florida and Pennsylvania, have continued to put forth proposals or expressed intent to take steps to reduce or minimize the ability of their state pension funds to invest in alternative asset classes, including by proposing to increase the reporting or other obligations applicable to their state pension funds that invest in such asset classes. Such proposals or actions would potentially discourage investment by such state pension funds in alternative asset classes by imposing meaningful compliance burdens and costs on them, which could adversely affect our ability to raise capital from such state pension funds. Other states could potentially take similar actions, which may further impair our access to capital from an investor base that has historically represented a significant portion of our fundraising.
Third-party investors in private equity, real assets and venture capitalprivate credit funds typically use distributions from prior investments to meet future capital calls. In cases where valuations of existing investments fall, andthe investment pace is delayed and/or the pace of distributions slows, investors may be unable or unwilling to make new commitments or fund existing commitments to third-party management investment funds such as those advised by us. Moreover, many funds sponsored by us and our competitors have recently invested more rapidly than in the past. As a result, investors may delay making new commitments until such time these investments start distributing capital.
Although many investors have increased and signaled that they expect to maintain the amount of commitments they are making to alternative investment funds, and aggregate fundraising totals are near the highest they have been since 2008, there can be no assurance that this historical or current levels of commitments to our funds will continue. For example, there is a continuing shift away from defined benefit pension plans to defined contributions plans, which could reduce the amount of assets available for us to manage on behalf of certain of our clients. In addition, investors may downsize their investment allocations to alternative managers, including private funds and fund of funds vehicles, to rebalance a disproportionate weighting of their overall investment portfolio among asset classes. Investors may also seek to consolidate

49






their investments with a smaller number of alternative assetinvestment managers or prefer to pursue investments directly instead of investing through our funds, each of which could impact the amount of allocations they make to our funds. For example, certain institutional investors are demonstrating a preference to in-source their own investment professionals and to make direct investments in alternative assets without the assistance of alternative asset advisers like us. Such institutional investors may become our competitors and could cease to be our clients.
Moreover, as some existing investors cease or significantly curtail making commitments to alternative investment funds, we may need to identify and attract new investors in order to maintain or increase the size of our investment funds. The lack of clarity aroundongoing changes in international and domestic tax regulations, including BEPS, may alsoadversely impact the tax neutrality of our funds, which could in turn limit our fund investors' ability to claim double tax treaty benefits on their investments, which may limit their investmentsinvestment in our funds. In addition,funds from certain investors have implemented or may implement restrictions against investing in certain typesclasses of asset classes such as fossil fuels, which would affect our ability to raise new funds focused on those asset classes, such as funds focused on energy or natural resources.investors. We are currently working to create avenues through which we expect to attract a new base of individual investors. There can be no assurances that we can find or secure commitments from those new investors. Our ability to raise new funds could similarly be hampered if the general appeal of private equity and alternative investments were to decline.
An investment in a private equity, credit or real estate fund is more illiquid and the returns on such investment may be more volatile than an investment in securities for which there is a more active and transparent market. Private equity, credit and alternativereal estate investments could fall into disfavor as a result of concerns about liquidity and short-term performance. Such concerns could be exhibited, in particular, by public pension funds, which have historically been among the largest investors in alternative assets. Concerns with liquidity could cause such public pension funds to reevaluate the appropriateness of alternative investments.
In addition, the evolving preferences of our fund investors may necessitate that alternatives to the traditional investment fund structure, such as managed accounts, smaller funds and co-investment vehicles, become a larger part of our business going forward. Certain investors have also implemented or may implement restrictions against investing in certain
67


types of asset classes or sectors, such as hydrocarbons, which could affect our ability to raise new funds focused on those asset classes, such as funds focused on conventional energy or natural resources, and which could have a negative impact on our ability to exit certain of our energy investments, or our ability to invest capital in our conventional energy funds. Given that funds focused on investing in carbon-based energy (“Carbon Energy Funds”) remain a part of our business (6% of total AUM as of December 31, 2022), the persistence of weakened market fundamentals in the energy sector could translate into future performance below investor expectations which, together with negative sentiments around carbon energy funds, could result in less investor demand for these funds in the future. Our future investments in carbon-based energy are expected to be made primarily through our non-controlling interest in NGP in the United States and Carlyle International Energy Partners outside the United States. If we, or NGP, were unable to raise the next generation of our energy related funds, at the same levels or at all, our fee-paying AUM and future management fees could be adversely impacted. This could increase our cost of raising capital at the scale we have historically achieved. We evaluate our equity method investment in NGP for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable, but no less than quarterly. For example, challenges with fundraising or lower future management fees could cause an impairment of our investment in NGP in the future. As of December 31, 2022, we continue to believe that our investment in NGP is not impaired.
Moreover, fund investors, shareholders and prospective investors, including pension funds, are increasingly focused on ESG matters and certain investors consider ESG factors in determining whether to invest in our funds and our common stock. In addition, some fund investors use third-party benchmarks or scores to assess our ESG practices and may use this as an input to decide whether to commit capital to us or invest in our funds and, further, may condition capital commitments to us on our taking or refraining from taking certain actions. Investment funds that specialize in companies that perform well in such assessments are increasingly popular. ESG ratings may vary widely in methodology, which often are not fully publicly disclosed by ratings providers. Investors and stockholders may choose not to invest in our funds or exclude our common stock from their investments for a range of reasons, including if our ESG practices or ratings do not fit their investment profiles, if we fail or are perceived to fail to demonstrate adequate progress toward ESG goals, initiatives, commitments, or objectives (including with respect to any climate-related targets and corresponding timelines), which could adversely impact our reputation and our ability to raise capital, impair our ability to maintain the size of our funds, and could cause the price of our common stock to decrease.
Conversely, anti-ESG sentiment has also gained momentum across the United States, with several states having enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or issued related legal opinions. For example, boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or “discriminate against” companies in certain industries (e.g., energy and mining) and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions, and ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors. If investors subject to such legislation viewed our funds or ESG practices, including our climate-related goals and commitments, as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in our funds, our ability to maintain the size of our funds could be impaired, and it could negatively affect the price of our common stock.
The failure to successfully raise capital commitments to new investment funds may also expose us to credit risk in respect of financing that we may provide to such funds. When existing capital commitments to a new investment fund are insufficient to fund in full a new investment fund’s participation in a transaction, we may lend money to or borrow money from financial institutions on behalf of such investment funds to bridge this difference and repay this financing with capital from subsequent investors to the fund. Our inability to identify and secure capital commitments from new investors to these funds may expose us to losses (in the case of money that we lend directly to such funds) or adversely impact our ability to repay such borrowings or otherwise have an adverse impact on our liquidity position. Finally, if we seek to expand into other business lines, we may also be unable to raise a sufficient amount of capital to adequately support such businesses. The failure of our investment funds to raise capital in sufficient amounts could result in a decrease in our AUM as well as management fee and transaction fee revenue, or could result in a decline in the rate of growth of our AUM and management fee and transaction fee revenue, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our revenues and financial condition. Our past experience with growth of AUM provides no assurance with respect to the future.
We have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to retail investors, which could expose us to new and greater levels of risk.
Although retail investors have been part of our historic distribution efforts, we have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to high-net-worth individuals, family offices and other mass affluent investors. In some cases we seek to distribute our unregistered funds to such retail investors indirectly through feeder funds sponsored by brokerage firms, private banks or other similar third-parties, and in other cases directly to
68


the qualified clients of private banks, independent investment advisors and brokers. In other cases, we offer registered investment products specifically designed for direct investment by both retail and institutional investors. Our initiatives to access retail investors entail the investment of resources and our objectives may not be fully realized.
Accessing retail investors and selling retail directed products exposes us to new and greater levels of risk, including heightened litigation and regulatory enforcement risks. To the extent we distribute retail products through new channels, including through unaffiliated firms, we may not be able to effectively monitor or control the manner of their distribution, which could result in litigation against us, including with respect to, among other things, claims that products distributed through such channels are distributed to customers for whom they are unsuitable or distributed in any other inappropriate manner. Although we seek to ensure that, through both due diligence and supervisory procedures, retail investors conduct themselves responsibly when accessing our investment products through these channels, to the extent that our investment products are being distributed through third parties, we are exposed to reputational damage and possible legal liability to the extent such third parties improperly sell our products to investors. Similarly, the hiring of employees to oversee independent advisors and brokers presents risks if they fail to follow training, review and supervisory procedures. In addition, the distribution of retail products through new channels, whether directly or through market intermediaries, could expose us to additional regulatory risk in the form of allegations of improper conduct and/or actions against us by state and federal regulators in the United States and regulators in jurisdictions outside the United States with respect to, among other things, product suitability, conflicts of interest and the adequacy of disclosure to customers to whom our products are distributed through those channels.
Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.
In connection with raising new funds or securing additional investments in existing funds, we negotiate terms for such funds and investments with existing and potential investors. The outcome of such negotiations could result in our agreement to terms that are materially less favorable to us than the terms of prior funds we have advised or funds advised by our competitors. Such terms could restrict our ability to raise investment funds with investment objectives or strategies that compete with existing funds, reduce fee revenues we earn, reduce the percentage of profits on third-party capital that we share in or add expenses and obligations for us in managing the fund or increase our potential liabilities, all of which could ultimately reduce our profitability. For instance, our newest U.S. buyout and Asia buyout funds, both currently fundraising and yet to begin investing, have increased the percentage of transaction fees that are shared with fund investors from 80% to 100% of the fees we generate. See “—A decline in the pace or size of investments by our carry funds could result in our receiving less revenue from transaction fees.” Additionally,In addition, a change in terms whichthat increases the amount of fee revenue the fund investors are entitled to could result in a significant decline in revenue generated from transaction fees. For instance, our more recent generations of U.S., Europe and Asia buyout funds have increased the percentage of transaction fees that are shared with fund investors from 80% to 100% of the allocable fees we generate. Given this change in terms, and to the extent we change our fee practices for other successor funds, we could experience a meaningful decline in the amount of transaction fee revenue we earn. In particular, if our fund investors do not continue to agree that we are permitted to retain fees we derive from capital markets transactions involving our portfolio companies, the ability of our GCM group to produce fee revenue could be significantly hindered.
Further, as institutional investors increasingly consolidate their relationships with investment firms and competition becomes more acute, we may receive more requests to modify the terms of our new funds, including reductions in management fees. Any agreement to or changes in terms less favorable to us could result in a material decrease in our profitability.
Moreover, certain institutional investors have publicly criticized certain fund fee and expense structures, including management fees. We have received and expect to continue to confront requests from a variety of investors and groups representing investors to decrease fees and to modify our carried interest and incentive fee structures, which could result in a reduction in or delay in the timing of receipt of the fees and carried interest and incentive fees we earn. In addition to negotiating the overall fund rate of the management fees offered, certain fund investors have negotiated alternative management fee structures in several of our investment funds. For example, certain funds have offered a management fee rate discount for certain investors that came into the first closing of each fund. In certain cases, we have agreed to charge management fees based on invested capital or net asset value as opposed charging management fees on committed capital. Further, the SEC’s focus on certain fund fee and expense arrangements may lead to increased publicity that could cause fund investors to further resist certain fees and expense reimbursements. Any modification of our existing fee or carry arrangements or the fee or carry structures for new investment funds could adversely affect our results of operations. See “—“Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive.”

5069







We may need to pay “giveback” obligations if and when they are triggered under the governing agreements with our investors.
If, at the end of any of the life of our Global Private Equity and Global Credit carry funds (or earlier with respect to certain of our funds), the carry fund has not achieved investment returns that (in most cases) exceed the preferred return threshold or (in almost all cases) the general partner receives net profits over the life of the fund in excess of its allocable share under the applicable partnership agreement, we will be obligated to repay an amount equal to the extent to which carried interest that was previously distributed to us exceeds the amounts to which we are ultimately entitled. This repayment obligation is known as a “giveback” obligation. As of December 31, 2022, we had accrued a giveback obligation of $40.9 million, representing the giveback obligation that would need to be paid by the firm if the carry funds were liquidated at their current fair values at that date, and of which approximately $22.0 million is attributable to us. The remaining obligations are related to amounts previously distributed to our senior Carlyle professionals, the majority of which relates to the accrued giveback obligation from CSP III and the Legacy Energy Funds.
When payment of a giveback obligation is anticipated (or “realized”), the portion of this liability that is expected to be borne by the common stockholders (i.e., the amount not expected to be funded by Carlyle professionals) has the effect of reducing our Distributable Earnings. Any remaining giveback obligation required to be funded on behalf of our funds would generally be due upon the liquidation of the remaining assets from the funds.
If, as of December 31, 2022, all of the investments held by our carry funds were deemed worthless, the amount of realized and distributed carried interest subject to potential giveback would have been $1.5 billion, on an after-tax basis where applicable. As of December 31, 2022, we have realized $239.3 million in aggregate giveback obligations since inception, which were funded primarily through collection of employee receivables related to giveback obligations and from Carlyle professionals and other non-controlling interests for their portion of the obligation. Of the $239.3 million in aggregate giveback obligations realized from inception to December 31, 2022, $70.6 million was attributable to Carlyle. See Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Financial Measures—Investment Income.”
Although a giveback obligation is specific to each person who received a distribution, and not a joint obligation, the governing agreements of our funds generally provide that to the extent a recipient does not fund his or her respective share, then we may have to fund such additional amounts beyond the amount of carried interest we retained, although we generally will retain the right to pursue any remedies that we have under such governing agreements against those carried interest recipients who fail to fund their obligations. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $18.9 million of our $40.9 million accrued giveback obligation is attributable to various current and former senior Carlyle professionals. We have historically withheld a portion of the cash from carried interest distributions to individual senior Carlyle professionals and other employees as security for their potential giveback obligations. We may need to use or reserve cash to repay such giveback obligations instead of using the cash for other purposes. See Part I, Item 1 “Business—Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds—Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” and Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Contractual Obligations—Contingent Obligations (Giveback)” and Notes 3 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Third-party investors in substantially all of our carry funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause, to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause by a simple majority vote and to terminate the investment period under certain circumstances and investors in certain of the investment funds we advise may redeem their investments. These events would lead to a decrease in our revenues, which could be substantial.
The governing agreements of almost all of our carry funds provide that, subject to certain conditions, third-party investors in those funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause or to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause by a simple majority vote. In addition, our investment vehicles that are structured as “funds of one,” or separately managed accounts, have a single investor or a few affiliated investors that typically have the right to terminate the investment period or cause a dissolution of the vehicle under certain circumstances. These actions would result in a reduction in management fees we would earn from such investment funds, vehicles, or accounts, and could result in a significant reduction in the expected amounts of total carried interest and incentive fees from those investment funds, vehicles, or accounts. Carried interest and incentive fees could be significantly reduced as a result of our inability to maximize the value of investments by an investment fund during the liquidation process or in the event of the triggering of a “giveback” obligation. Finally, the applicable investment funds, vehicles, or accounts would cease to exist after completion of liquidation and winding-up.
70


In addition, the governing agreements of certain of our investment funds provide that in the event certain “key persons” in our investment funds do not meet specified time commitments with regard to managing the fund (for example, certain of the investment professionals serving on the investment committee or advising the fund), then investors in certain funds have the right to vote to terminate the investment period by a simple majority vote in accordance with specified procedures, accelerate the withdrawal of their capital on an investor-by-investor basis, or the fund’s investment period will automatically terminate and the vote of a simple majority of investors is required to restart it. While we believe that our investment professionals have appropriate incentives to remain in their respective positions, based on equity ownership, profit participation and other contractual provisions, we are not able to guarantee the ongoing participation of the management team members in respect of our funds. In addition to having a significant negative impact on our revenue, earnings and cash flow, the occurrence of a key person event with respect to any of our investment funds would likely result in significant reputational damage to us and could negatively impact our future fundraising efforts.
For example, the AlpInvest funds generally provide for suspension of the investment period if there is a key person event, the right of a supermajority of investors to remove the general partner with cause and, in some cases, without cause, but generally have not provided for liquidation without cause. Where AlpInvest funds include “key person” provisions, they are focused on specific existing AlpInvest personnel, as applicable.
In addition, because our investment funds generally have an adviser that is registered under the Advisers Act, the management agreements of each of our investment funds would be terminated upon an “assignment” to a third-party of these agreements without appropriate investor consent, which assignment may be deemed to occur in the event these advisers were to experience a change of control. We cannot be certain that consents required to assignments of our investment management agreements will be obtained if a change of control occurs. “Assignment” of these agreements without investor consent could cause us to lose the fees we earn from such investment funds.
Third-party investors in our investment funds with commitment-based structures may not satisfy their contractual obligation to fund capital calls when requested by us, which could adversely affect a fund’s operations and performance.
Investors in our carry funds make capital commitments to those funds that we are entitled to call from those investors at any time during prescribed periods. We depend on investors fulfilling their commitments when we call capital from them in order for those funds to consummate investments and otherwise pay their obligations (for example, management fees) when due. Any investor that did not fund a capital call would generally be subject to several possible penalties, including having a significant amount of its existing investment forfeited in that fund. However, the impact of the penalty is directly correlated to the amount of capital previously invested by the investor in the fund and if an investor has invested little or no capital, for instance, early in the life of the fund, then the forfeiture penalty may not be as meaningful. Investors may also negotiate for lesser or reduced penalties at the outset of the fund, thereby inhibiting our ability to enforce the funding of a capital call. Our use of subscription lines of credit to purchase an investment prior to calling capital from fund investors could increase the prevalence of defaulting limited partners. Should the value of an investment funded through a fund line-of-credit decline, especially early in a fund’s life-cycle where minimal capital has been contributed by the fund’s investors, a limited partner may decide not to fund its commitment. In addition, third-party investors typically use distributions from prior investments to meet future capital calls. In cases where valuations of investors’ existing investments fall and the pace of distributions slows, investors may be unable to make new commitments to third-party managed investment funds such as those advised by us. If investors were to fail to satisfy a significant amount of capital calls for any particular fund or funds, the operation and performance of those funds could be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, our failure to comply with applicable pay-to-play laws, regulations and/or policies adopted by a number of states and municipal pension funds, as well as the New York Attorney General’s Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct, may, in certain instances, excuse a public pension fund investor from its obligation to make further capital contributions relating to all or any part of an investment or allow it to withdraw from the fund. If a public pension fund investor were to seek to be excused from funding a significant amount of capital calls for any particular fund or funds, the operation and performance of those funds could be materially and adversely affected.
Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance and accrued performance fees.allocations.
There are often no readily ascertainable market prices for a substantial majority of illiquid investments of our investment funds. We determine the fair value of the investments of each of our investment funds at least quarterly based on the fair value guidelines set forth by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.States (“U.S. GAAP”). The fair value
71


measurement accounting guidance establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that ranks the observability of market inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, the characteristics specific to the financial instrument and the state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices, or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets, will generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.
Investments for which market prices are not observable include, but are not limited to, illiquid investments in operating companies, real estate, energy ventures, andinfrastructure projects, structured vehicles and other funds, and encompass all components of the capital structure, including equity, mezzanine, debt, preferred equity and derivative instruments such as options and warrants. Fair values of such investments are determined by reference to the market approach (i.e.(i.e., multiplying a key performance metric of the investee company or asset, such as EBITDA, by a relevant valuation multiple observed in the range of comparable public entities or transactions, adjusted by management as appropriate for differences between the investment and the referenced comparables), the income approach (i.e., discounting projected future cash flows of the investee company or asset and/or capitalizing representative stabilized cash flows of the investee company or asset) and other methodologies such as prices provided by reputable dealers or pricing services, option pricing models and replacement costs. In addition, we continue to examine the impact of the TCJA on the future cash flows of certain investments, and it is possible that the TCJA could adversely impact certain investment valuations in future periods.
The determination of fair value using these methodologies takes into consideration a range of factors including but not limited to the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the investment, local market conditions, the multiples of comparable securities, current and projected operating performance and financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment. These valuation methodologies involve a significant degree of management judgment. For example, as to investments that we share with another sponsor, we may apply a different valuation methodology than the other sponsor does and/or derive a different value than the other sponsor has derived on the same investment, which could cause some investors and regulators to question our valuations.
Because there is significant uncertainty in the valuation of, or in the stability of the value of, illiquid investments, the fair values of such investments as reflected in an investment fund’s net asset value do not necessarily reflect the prices that would be obtained by us on behalf of the investment fund when such investments are realized. Realizations at values significantly lower than the values at which investments havehad been reflected in prior fund net asset values would result in reduced earnings or losses for the applicable fund, and potentially the loss of potential carried interest and incentive fees. Changes in values attributed to investments from quarter to quarter may result in volatility in the net asset values and results of operations that we report from period to period. Also,In addition, a situation where asset values turn out to be materially different than values reflected in prior fund net asset values could cause investors to lose confidence in us, which could in turn result in difficulty in raising additional funds.
The historical returns attributable tofinancial projections of our portfolio companies could prove inaccurate.
Our funds including those presented in this report, should notgenerally establish the capital structure of portfolio companies on the basis of financial projections prepared by the management of such portfolio companies. These projected operating results will normally be considered as indicativebased primarily on judgments of the management of the portfolio companies. In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the projections are developed. General economic conditions, which are not predictable, along with other factors may cause actual performance to fall short of the financial projections that were used to establish a given portfolio company’s capital structure. Because of the leverage that we typically employ in our investments, this could cause a substantial decrease in the value of our funds orequity holdings in the portfolio company. The inaccuracy of financial projections could cause us to misstate the values of our future results orfund’s investments and, therefore, our accrued performance allocations, and ultimately cause our funds’ performance to fall short of any returns expectedour expectations.
The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with investments by our investment funds may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment.
Before making private equity and other investments, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the known facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. The objective of the due diligence process is to identify attractive investment opportunities based on the known facts and circumstances and initial risk assessment surrounding an investment and, depending on our ownership or control of private equity investments, prepare a framework that may be used from the date of an acquisition to drive operational achievement and value creation. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, regulatory, tax, accounting, environmental (including climate change), social, governance and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisors, accountants and investment banks may be involved in our common units.the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of investment. Nevertheless,
We have presented in this Form 10-K
72


when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an investment, we rely on the resources available to us, including information relating toprovided by the historical performance of our investment funds. The historical and potential future returnstarget of the investment funds that we advise, however, are not directly linked to returns on our common units. Therefore, any continued positive performance of the investment funds that we advise will not necessarily result in positive returns on an investment in our common units. However, poor performance of the investment funds that we advise would cause a decline in our revenue from such investment funds, and could therefore have a negative effect on our performance, our ability to raise future funds and, in all likelihood the returns on an investment in our common units.
Moreover,some circumstances, third-party investigations and analysis. The due diligence process may at times be subjective with respect to newly-organized companies for which only limited information is available. Due to intense competition in the historical returns of our investment funds:
marketplace we may create new funds in the future that reflect a different asset mix and different investment strategies, as well as a varied geographic and industry exposure as compared to our present funds, and any such new funds could have different returns than our existing or previous funds;

51






the rates of returns of our carry funds reflect unrealized gains as of the applicable measurement date that may never be realized, which may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from those funds’ investments;

unitholders will not benefit from any value that was created in our funds prior to our becoming a public company to the extent such value was previously realized;

in recent years, there has been increased competition for private equity investment opportunities resulting from the increased amount of capital invested in alternative investment funds, high liquidity in debt markets and strong equity markets, and the increased competition for investments may reduce our returns in the future;

the rates of returns of some of our funds in certain years have been positively influenced by a number of investments that experienced rapid and substantial increases in value following the dates on which those investments were made, which may not occur with respect to future investments;

our investment funds’ returns in some years have benefited from investment opportunities and general market conditions that may not repeat themselves;

our current or future investment funds might not be able to avail themselves of comparable investment opportunities or market conditions; and the circumstances under which our funds may make future investments may differ significantly from those conditions prevailing in the past (including, for example, particularly favorable borrowing conditions from 2013 through early 2015 for many of our investments that relied heavily on the use of leverage);

newly-established funds may generate lower returns during the period that they take to deploy their capital.
Our recent performance has benefited from today's high multiples and asset prices by selling investments made in past years at what we believe to be attractive prices. In the current market environment, earning such returns on new investments will be much more difficultless time than in the past to complete our due diligence or our competitors may review less due diligence thereby increasing the speed with which they complete their review. We cannot be certain that the due diligence investigation that we carry out with respect to any investment opportunity will reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity. In this respect, information and data provided or utilized by third-party advisors during diligence may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable, and may cause us to incorrectly identify, prioritize, assess or analyze or omit to examine in detail the future internal rateinvestee entity’s ESG practices and/or related risks and opportunities. Moreover, considering ESG factors when evaluating an investment could result in the selection or exclusion of return for any currentcertain investments based on our or futurea third party advisor’s view of certain ESG-related and other factors or could cause a fund to not make an investment that it may vary considerably from the historical internal rate of return generated by any particular fund or forhave otherwise made, which carries risk that our funds may perform differently than investment funds that do not take the same ESG factors into account in a congruent manner. In addition, ESG factors are only some of the many factors we consider in making an investment, and there is no guarantee that our consideration of ESG factors during due diligence will ultimately enhance the long-term value of our investments.
The due diligence process in connection with carve-out transactions may underestimate the complexity and/or level of dependence a business has on its parent company and affiliated entities. Given that a carve-out business often does not have financial statements that accurately reflect its true financial performance as a whole. Future returnsstand-alone business, due diligence assessments of such investments can be particularly difficult. Instances of fraud, accounting irregularities and other improper, illegal or deceptive practices can be difficult to detect, and fraud and other deceptive practices can be widespread in certain jurisdictions. Several of our funds invest in emerging market countries that may not have established laws and regulations that are as stringent as in more developed nations, or where existing laws and regulations may not be consistently enforced. For example, our funds invest throughout jurisdictions that have material perceptions of corruption according to international rating standards (such as “Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index”) such as China, India, Indonesia, Latin America, MENA and Sub-Saharan Africa. Similarly, our funds invest in companies in the U.S. and other jurisdictions and regions with low perceived corruption but whose business may be conducted in other high-risk jurisdictions.
Due diligence on investment opportunities in these jurisdictions is frequently more complicated because consistent and uniform commercial practices in such locations may not be developed or our access to information may be very limited. Fraud, accounting irregularities and deceptive practices can be especially difficult to detect in such locations. In addition, investment opportunities may arise in companies that have historic and/or unresolved regulatory, tax, fraud or accounting related investigations, audits or inquiries and/or have been subjected to public accusations of improper behavior. However, even heightened and specific due diligence and investigations with respect to such matters may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity and/or will also be affected byable to accurately identify, assess and quantify settlements, enforcement actions and judgments that may arise and which could have a material adverse effect on the risks described elsewhereportfolio company’s business, financial condition and operations, as well as potential significant harm to the portfolio company’s reputation and prospects. We cannot be certain that our due diligence investigations will result in this report, including risksinvestments being successful or that the actual financial performance of an investment will not fall short of the industries and businesses in whichfinancial projections we used when evaluating that investment. Failure to identify risks associated with our investments could have a particular fund invests. See—“Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Segment Analysis—Fund Performance Metrics” for additional information.

material adverse effect on our business.
Dependence on significant leverage in investments by our funds could adversely affect our ability to achieve attractive rates of return on those investments.
Many of our carry funds’ investments rely heavily on the use of leverage, and our ability to achieve attractive rates of return on investments will depend on our ability to access sufficient sources of indebtedness at attractive rates. For example, in many private equity investments, indebtedness may constitute and historically has constituted up to 70% or more of a portfolio company’s or real estate asset’s total debt and equity capitalization, including debt that may be incurred in connection with the investment, whether incurred at or above the investment-level entity. The absence of available sources of sufficient debt financing for extended periods of time could therefore materially and adversely affect our CPEGlobal Private Equity businesses. As the COVID-19 pandemic began, in an effort to ensure adequate liquidity for an unknown period of time and Real Assets businesses. In addition,avoid potential future disruptions in normal financial market function, many of our portfolio companies drew down available lines of credit in excess of typical utilization. These precautionary efforts provided availability of working capital and avoided unnecessary business disruption. Certain of these portfolio companies may retain this capital for an extended period. Therefore, the leverage at these portfolio companies will increase.
73


An increase in either the general levels of interest rates or in the risk spread demanded by sources of indebtedness would make it more expensive to finance those investments, thereby reducing returns. While increases in interest rates may lead to higher risk adjusted returns for our Global Credit business, when coupled with restrictions on the deductibility of interest expense, such increases may also lead to higher default rates, lower valuations of existing assets and cause deployment of capital to slow, and cause cash flow issues and/or credit challenges if such interest rates have not otherwise been fixed or hedged. Increases in interest rates could also make it more difficult to locate and consummate private equity investments because other potential buyers, including operating companies acting as strategic buyers, may be able to bid for an asset at a higher price due to a lower overall cost of capital or their ability to benefit from a higher amount of cost savings following the acquisition of the asset. See “Risks Related to our Company—Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively impact our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise capital, any of which could materially reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.” In addition, a portion of the indebtedness used to finance private equity investments often includes leveraged loans and high-yield debt securities issued in the public capital markets and debt instruments privately placed with institutional investors in the private capital markets. Availability of capital from the leveraged loan, high-yield and private debt markets is subject to significant volatility, and there may be times when we might not be able to access those markets at attractive rates, or at all, when completing an investment. Certain investments may also be financed through borrowings on fund-level debt facilities, which may or may not be available for a refinancing at the end of their respective terms. Additionally,Moreover, to the extent there is a reduction in the availability of financing for extended periods of time, the purchasing power of a prospective buyer may be more limited, adversely impacting the fair value of our funds’ investments and thereby reducing the acquisition price. Finally, recent developments in U.S. and international tax policy have significantly limited the availability of income tax deductions for interest payments on the indebtednessleverage used to finance some of our carry funds’ investments. Interest deductibility rules continue to evolve, and further restrictions and changes are anticipated in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. See “Risks Related to Taxation—Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments have historically been deductible expenses for income tax purposes, subject to limitations under applicable tax law and policy. The availability of interest deductions, however, may be limited under new rules imposed by the TCJA which apply complex limitations on the deductibility of business interest expense over 30% of a taxpayer’s taxable

52






income of such business (with adjustments for certain interest and taxes, and for taxable years before 2022, depreciation and amortization). These new rules, as well as any future changes in such tax law(companies) or policy to eliminate or substantially limit these income tax deductions, as has been discussed from time to time in various jurisdictions,fund income.” Such restrictions could reduce the after-tax rates of return on the affected investments, which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results. On October 5, 2015, the OECD published additional papers under the BEPS initiative. In action 4, the OECD recommends that countries adopt a limitation on excessive deductions under a fixed ratio rule and supplemented by a worldwide group ratio and certain targeted rules as needed. It is anticipated that ratios may range between 10% and 30%. It is still unclear how different countries will implement the various recommendations and it is unclear how this will affect the current deductibility of interest in the various jurisdictions. See “— Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the United States.”
Investments in highly leveraged entities are also inherently more sensitive to declines in revenue, increases in expenses and interest rates and adverse economic, market and industry developments. Furthermore, the incurrence of a significant amount of indebtedness by an entity could, among other things:
subject the entity to a number of restrictive covenants, terms and conditions, any violation of which could be viewed by creditors as an event of default and could materially impact our ability to realize value from the investment;

allow even moderate reductions in operating cash flow to render the entity unable to service its indebtedness, leading to a bankruptcy or other reorganization of the entity and a loss of part or all of the equity investment in it;

give rise to an obligation to make mandatory prepayments of debt using excess cash flow, which might limit the entity’s ability to respond to changing industry conditions to the extent additional cash is needed for the response, to make unplanned but necessary capital expenditures or to take advantage of growth opportunities;

limit the entity’s ability to adjust to changing market conditions, thereby placing it at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have relatively less debt;

limit the entity’s ability to engage in strategic acquisitions that might be necessary to generate attractive returns or further growth; and

limit the entity’s ability to obtain additional financing or increase the cost of obtaining such financing, including for capital expenditures, working capital or other general corporate purposes.
As a result, the risk of loss associated with a leveraged entity is generally greater than for companies with comparatively less debt. Similarly, the leveraged nature of the investments of our Real Assetsreal assets funds increases the risk that a decline in the fair value of the underlying real estate or tangible assets will result in their abandonment or foreclosure.
74


When our private equity funds’ portfolio investments reach the point when debt incurred to finance those investments matures in significant amounts and must be either repaid or refinanced, those investments may suffer materially suffer if they have not generated sufficient cash flow to repay maturing debt and there is insufficient capacity and availability in the financing markets to permit them to refinance maturing debt on satisfactory terms, or at all. If a limited availability of financing for such purposes were to persist for an extended period of time, when significant amounts of the debt incurred to finance our CPE and Real AssetsGlobal Private Equity funds’ portfolio investments came due, these funds could be materially and adversely affected.
Many of our Global Credit funds may choose to use leverage as part of their respective investment programs and regularly borrow a substantial amount of their capital. The use of leverage poses a significant degree of risk and enhances the possibility of a significant loss in the value of the investment portfolio. A fund may borrow money from time to time to purchase or carry securities or may enter into derivative transactions (such as total return swaps) with counterparties that have embedded leverage. The interest expense and other costs incurred in connection with such borrowing may not be recovered by appreciation in the securities purchased or carried and will be lost, and the timing and magnitude of such losses may be accelerated or exacerbated, in the event of a decline in the market value of such securities. Gains realized with borrowed funds may cause the fund’s net asset value to increase at a faster rate than would be the case without borrowings. However, if investment results fail to cover the cost of borrowings, the fund’s net asset value could also decrease faster than if there had been no borrowings. Increases in interest rates could also decrease the value of fixed-rate debt investment that our investment

53






funds make. In addition, to the extent that any changes in tax law make debt financing less attractive to certain categories of borrowers, this could adversely affect the investment opportunities for our credit-focused funds.
Any of the foregoing circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
A declineChanges in the pacedebt financing markets or sizehigher interest rates could negatively impact the ability of certain of our funds and their portfolio companies to obtain attractive financing or re-financing and could increase the cost of such financing if it is obtained, which could lead to lower-yielding investments and could potentially decrease our net income.
A significant contraction or weakening in the market for debt financing or other adverse change relating to the terms of debt financing, including higher interest rates and equity requirements and more restrictive covenants, could have a material adverse impact on our business and that of our investment funds and their portfolio companies. In recent years, many jurisdictions, including the United States, have introduced (or are considering introducing) new restrictions on the deductibility of interest expense, which could negatively impact the financing of new investments or the operations of our funds’ portfolio companies. Regulatory changes that constrain banks’ ability to provide debt financing also could have a material adverse impact on our business and that of our investment funds and their portfolio companies. In addition, higher interest rates may create downward pressure on the price of real estate, increase the cost and availability of debt financing for the transactions our funds may pursue and decrease the value of fixed-rate debt investments made by our carryfunds. If our funds are unable to obtain committed debt financing for potential acquisitions or are only able to obtain debt financing at unfavorable interest rates or on unfavorable terms, our funds may have difficulty completing acquisitions that may have otherwise been profitable or if completed, such acquisitions could resultgenerate lower than expected profits, each of which could lead to a decrease in our receiving less revenue from transaction fees.
The transaction fees that we earn are driven in part by the pace at whichnet income. Moreover, if our ability to deduct corporate interest expense is substantially limited, our funds make investments and the sizemay face increased competition from strategic buyers of those investments. Any decline in that paceassets who may have an overall lower cost of capital or the sizeability to benefit from a higher amount of such investmentscost savings following an acquisition, which could reducelead to a decrease in our transaction feesnet income. In addition, rising interest rates, coupled with periods of significant equity and couldcredit market volatility may potentially make it more difficult for us to raise capital onfind attractive opportunities for our anticipated schedule. Many factors could cause such a decline in the pacefunds to exit and realize value from their existing investments. Any failure by lenders to provide previously committed financing can also expose us to potential claims by sellers of investment, including:businesses that we may have contracted to purchase.
the inability of our investment professionals to identify attractive investment opportunities;

competition for such opportunities among other potential acquirers;

decreased availability of capital on attractive terms; and

our failure to consummate identified investment opportunities because of business, regulatory or legal complexities and adverse developments in the U.S. or global economy or financial markets.
In addition, we have confronted and expect to continue to confront requests from a variety of investors and groups representing investors to increase the percentage of transaction fees we share with our fund investors (or to decline to receive transaction fees fromOur funds’ portfolio companies held by our funds).also regularly utilize the corporate loan and bond markets to obtain financing for their operations. While credit was available for much of 2020 and 2021 and new debt issuance hit record levels in some markets, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic exhibited how abruptly credit markets can weaken from exogenous shocks and become unavailable or unattractive for issuers. For example, in our Asiathe first and U.S. Buyout funds currentlyearly second quarters of 2020, corporate debt issuance and merger and acquisition activity decreased significantly as market volatility rose and credit spreads widened. In addition, corporate debt issuance and merger and acquisition activity again decreased significantly in 2022, as rising interest rates and recession concerns impacted the credit markets. It is possible that during periods of stress, tightening in the market, we have increased the percentage of transaction fees that are shared with fund investors from 80%credit markets could render debt financing difficult to 100% of the fees we generate. Given this change, and toobtain, less attractive or more expensive. To the extent we change our fee practices for other successor funds, we could experience a meaningful decline in the amount of transaction fee revenue we earn. See “—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”

The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive.
The alternative asset management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to investors, investor liquidity and willingness to invest, fund terms (including fees), brand recognition, types of products offered and business reputation. Our alternative asset management business, as well as our investment funds, competes with a number of private equity funds, specialized investment funds, hedge funds, corporate buyers, traditional asset managers, real estate development companies, commercial banks, investment banks and other financial institutions (as well as sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors).
Additionally, developments in financial technology (or fintech), such as a distributed ledger technology (or blockchain), have the potential to disrupt the financial industry and change the way financial institutions, as well as asset managers, do business. A number of factors serve to increase our competitive risks:
a number of our competitors in some of our businesses have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;

some of our funds may not perform as well as competitors’ fundsmonetary policy, tax or other available investment products;

several of our competitors have significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectivesregulatory changes or difficult credit markets render such financing difficult to ours, whichobtain or otherwise less attractive, this may create additional competition for investment opportunities and may reducenegatively impact the size and duration of pricing inefficiencies that otherwise could be exploited;

some of these competitors (including strategic competitors) may also have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for our funds with respect to investment opportunities;


54






some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds than us, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and to bid more aggressively than us for investments that we want to make;

some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation and accordingly may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do and/or bear less compliance expense than us;

some of our competitors may have more flexibility than us in raising certain types of investment funds under the investment management contracts they have negotiated with their investors;

some of our competitors may have better expertise or be regarded by investors as having better expertise in a specific asset class or geographic region than we do;

our competitors that are corporate buyers may be able to achieve synergistic cost savings in respect of an investment, which may provide them with a competitive advantage in bidding for an investment;

our competitors have instituted or may institute low cost high speed financial applications and services based on artificial intelligence and new competitors may enter the asset management space using new investment platforms based on artificial intelligence;

there are relatively few barriers to entry impeding the formation of new alternative asset management firms, and the successful efforts of new entrants into our various businesses, including former “star” portfolio managers at large diversified financial institutions as well as such institutions themselves, is expected to continue to result in increased competition;

some investors may prefer to pursue investments directly instead of investing through one of our funds;

some investors may prefer to invest with an asset manager that is not publicly traded or is smaller with only one or two investment products that it manages; and

other industry participants may, from time to time, seek to recruit our investment professionals and other employees away from us.
We may lose investment opportunities in the future if we do not match investment prices, structures, products or terms offered by our competitors. Alternatively, we may experience decreased rates of return and increased risks of loss if we match investment prices, structures and terms offered by our competitors. Moreover, if we are forced to compete with other alternative asset managers on the basis of price, we may not be able to maintain our current fund fee and carried interest terms. We have historically competed primarily on theoperating performance of our funds, and notportfolio companies that use debt to fund certain of their operations. This may result in a negative impact on the levelinvestment returns of our fees or carried interest relative to those of our competitors. However, there is a risk that fees and carried interest in the alternative asset management industry will decline, without regard to the historical performance of a manager. Fee or carried interest income reductions on existing or future funds, without corresponding decreases in our cost structure, would adversely affect our revenues and profitability. See “—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
The attractiveness of our investment funds relative to investments in other investment products could decrease depending on economic conditions.funds. In addition, to the extent that anyconditions in the credit
75


markets or tax or other regulatory changes in tax law make debt financing less attractive to certain categories of borrowers, this could adversely affect the investment opportunitiesit difficult or impossible for our credit-focused funds. This competitive pressure could adversely affectinvestments to refinance or extend maturities on their outstanding debt, either on favorable terms or at all, some of our abilityportfolio companies’ operations may be negatively impacted or our portfolio companies may be unable to make successful investmentsrepay their debt at maturity or interests when due, and limit our abilitymay be forced to raise future investment funds, eithersell assets, undergo a recapitalization or seek bankruptcy protection, any of which would adverselyalso likely impair the value of our funds’ portfolio companies and lead to a decrease in investment income earned by us. See “Risks Related to our Company—Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively impact our business revenue, resultsin many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of operations and cash flow. See “—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”
The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with investments made by our investment funds may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment.
Before making private equity and other investments, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based onreducing the known facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. The objective of the due diligence process is to identify attractive investment opportunities based on the known facts and circumstances and initial risk assessment

55






surrounding an investment and, depending on our ownership or control of private equity investments, prepare a framework that may be used from the date of an acquisition to drive operational achievement and value creation. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, regulatory, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisors, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of investment. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an investment, we rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the investment and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations and analysis. The due diligence process may at times be subjective with respect to newly-organized companies for which only limited information is available. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that the due diligence investigation that we carry out with respect to any investment opportunity will reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity. The due diligence process in connection with carve-out transactions may underestimate the complexity and/or level of dependence a business has on its parent company and affiliated entities.  Because a carve-out business often does not have financial statements that accurately reflect its true financial performance as a stand-alone business, due diligence assessments of such investments can be particularly difficult. Instances of fraud, accounting irregularities and other improper, illegal or deceptive practices can be difficult to detect, and fraud and other deceptive practices can be widespread in certain jurisdictions. Severalability of our investment funds invest in emerging market countries that may not have established laws and regulations that are as stringent as in more developed nations, or where existing laws and regulations may not be consistently enforced. For example, our funds invest throughout jurisdictions that have material perceptionsto raise capital, any of corruption according to international rating standards (such as “Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index”) such as China, India, Indonesia, Latin America, MENA and Sub-Saharan Africa. Similarly, our funds invest in companies in the U.S. and other jurisdictions and regions with low perceived corruption but whose business may be conducted in other high-risk jurisdictions.
Due diligence on investment opportunities in these jurisdictions is frequently more complicated because consistent and uniform commercial practices in such locations may not be developed or our access to information may be very limited. Fraud, accounting irregularities and deceptive practices can be especially difficult to detect in such locations. In addition, investment opportunities may arise in companies that have historic and/or unresolved regulatory, tax, fraud or accounting related investigations, audits or inquiries and/or have been subjected to public accusations of improper behavior. However, even heightened and specific due diligence and investigations with respect to such matters may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity and/or will be able to accurately identify, assess and quantify settlements, enforcement actions and judgments that may arise and which could have a material adverse effect on the portfolio company’s business,materially reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial conditionprospects and operations, as well potential significant harm to the portfolio company’s reputation and prospects. We cannot be certain that our due diligence investigations will result in investments being successful or that the actual financial performance of an investment will not fall short of the financial projections we used when evaluating that investment. Failure to identify risks associated with our investments could have a material adverse effect on our business.

condition.”
Our funds invest in relatively high-risk, illiquid assets, and we may fail to realize any profits from these activities for a considerable period of time or lose some or all of our principal investments.

Many of our investment funds invest in securities that are not publicly traded. In many of those cases, our investment funds may be prohibited by contract or by applicable securities laws from selling such securities for a period of time. Our investment funds will not be able to sell these securities publicly unless their sale is registered under applicable securities laws, or unless an exemption from such registration is available. The ability of many of our investment funds, particularly our private equity funds, to dispose of investments is heavily dependent on the public equity markets. For example, the ability to realize any value from an investment may depend upon the ability to complete an initial public offering of the portfolio company in which such investment is held. Even if the securities are publicly traded, large holdings of securities can often be disposed of only over a substantial length of time, exposing the investment returns to risks of downward movement in market prices during the intended disposition period. Moreover,In addition, because the investment strategy of many of our funds, particularly our private equity funds, often entails our having representation on our funds’ public portfolio company boards, our funds may be able to effect such sales only during limited trading windows. Additionally,Moreover, certain provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws (e.g., Section 16 of the Exchange Act Section 16)Act) may constrain our investment funds'funds’ ability to effect purchases or sales of publicly traded securities. Accordingly, under certain conditions, our investment funds may be forced to either sell securities at lower prices than they had expected to realize or defer, potentially for a considerable period of time, sales that they had planned to make.

We have made and expect to continue to make significant principal investments in our current and future investment funds. Contributing capital to these investment funds is subject to significant risks, and we may lose some or all of the principal amount of our investments.


56






The investments of our private equity funds are subject to a number of inherent risks.
Our results are highly dependent on our continued ability to generate attractive returns from our investments. Investments made by our private equity funds involve a number of significant risks inherent to private equity investing, including the following:
we advise funds that invest in businesses that operate in a variety of industries that are subject to extensive domestic and foreign regulation, such as the telecommunications industry, the aerospace, defense and government services industry and the healthcare industry (including companies that supply equipment and services to governmental agencies), that may involve greater risk due to rapidly changing market and governmental conditions in those sectors;

significant failures of our portfolio companies to comply with laws and regulations applicable to them could affect the ability of our funds to invest in other companies in certain industries in the future and could harm our reputation;

companies in which private equity investments are made may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of their equity securities or any collateral or guarantees provided with respect to their debt;

companies in which private equity investments are made are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons and, as a result, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of those persons could have a material adverse impact on their business and prospects and the investment made;

companies in which private equity investments are made may be businesses or divisions acquired from larger operating entities which may require a rebuilding or replacement of financial reporting, information technology, back office and other operations;

companies in which private equity investments are made may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position;

companies in which private equity investments are made generally have less predictable operating results;

instances of fraud, corruption and other deceptive practices committed by senior management of portfolio companies in which our funds invest may undermine our due diligence efforts with respect to such companies and, upon the discovery of such fraud, negatively affect the valuation of a fund’s investments as well as contribute to overall market volatility that can negatively impact a fund’s investment program;

our funds may make investments that they do not advantageously dispose of prior to the date the applicable fund is dissolved, either by expiration of such fund’s term or otherwise, resulting in a lower than expected return on the investments and, potentially, on the fund itself;

our funds generally establish the capital structure of portfolio companies on the basis of the financial projections based primarily on management judgments and assumptions, and general economic conditions and other factors may cause actual performance to fall short of these financial projections, which could cause a substantial decrease in the value of our equity holdings in the portfolio company and cause our funds’ performance to fall short of our expectations;

under ERISA, a “trade or business” within a “controlled group” can be liable for the ERISA Title IV pension obligations (including withdrawal liability for union multiemployer plans) of any other member of the controlled group. This “controlled group” liability represents one of the few situations in which one entity’s liability can be imposed upon another simply because the entities are united by common ownership, but in order for such joint and several liability to be imposed, two tests must be satisfied: (1) the entity on which such liability is to be imposed must be a “trade or business” and (2) a “controlled group” relationship must exist among such entity and the pension plan sponsor or the contributing employer. While a number of cases have held that managing investments is not a “trade or business” for tax purposes, at least one federal Circuit Court case has concluded that an investment fund could be a “trade or business” for ERISA purposes (and,

57






consequently, could be liable for underfunded pension liabilities of an insolvent portfolio company) based upon a number of factors present in that case, including the fund’s level of involvement in the management of its portfolio companies and the nature of its management fee arrangements. Ongoing litigation related to the Circuit Court’s decision suggests that additional factors may be relevant for purposes of determining whether an investment fund could face “controlled group” liability under ERISA, including the structure of the investment, and the nature of the fund’s relationship with other affiliated investors and co-investors in the portfolio company. Moreover, regardless of whether or not an investment fund is determined to be a trade or business for purposes of ERISA, a court might hold that one of the fund’s portfolio companies could become jointly and severally liable for another portfolio company’s unfunded pension liabilities pursuant to the ERISA “controlled group” rules, depending upon the relevant investment structures and ownership interests as noted above; and

executive officers, directors and employees of an equity sponsor may be named as defendants in litigation involving a company in which a private equity investment is made or is being made.
Our real estate funds are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
Investments in our real estate funds will be subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets. These risks include the following:
those associated with the burdens of ownership of real property;

general and local economic conditions;

changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for instance, of overbuilding);

fluctuations in the average occupancy and room rates for hotel properties;

the financial resources of tenants;

changes in building, environmental and other laws;

failure to obtain necessary approvals and/or permits;

energy and supply shortages;

various uninsured or uninsurable risks;

natural disasters;

changes in government regulations (such as rent control);

changes in real property tax rates;

changes in interest rates;

the reduced availability of mortgage funds which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable;

negative developments in the economy that depress travel activity;

environmental liabilities;

contingent liabilities on disposition of assets;

unexpected cost overruns in connection with development projects;


58






terrorist attacks, war and other factors that are beyond our control; and

dependence on local operating partners.
In addition to real property assets, our real estate funds may also invest in real estate related operating companies such as logistics hubs and data centers. These investments are similar to the portfolio investments made by our Corporate Private Equity funds and are subject to similar risks and uncertainties as apply to those operating companies. See "—The investments of our private equity funds are subject to a number of inherent risks."
Real estate markets may experience sharp increases in capitalization rates and declines in value as a result of overall economic decline and the limited availability of financing and the value of certain investments in our real estate funds may decline significantly, as was the case in 2008 and 2009 in the United States, Europe and Japan. In addition, if our real estate funds acquire direct or indirect interests in undeveloped land or underdeveloped real property, which may often be non-income producing, they will be subject to the risks normally associated with such assets and development activities, including risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory or environmental approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks beyond the control of our fund, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages) and the availability of both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. Additionally, our funds’ properties are often managed by a third party, which makes us dependent upon such third parties and subjects us to risks associated with the actions of such third parties. Any of these factors may cause the value of the investments in our real estate funds to decline, which may have a material impact on our results of operations.
We often pursue investment opportunities that involve business, regulatory, legal or other complexities.
As an element of our investment style, we may pursue unusually complex investment opportunities. This can often take the form of substantial business, regulatory, tax, or legal complexity that would deter other asset managers. Our tolerance for complexity presents risks, as such transactions can be more difficult, expensive and time-consuming to finance and execute; it can be more difficult to manage or realize value from the assets acquired in such transactions; and such transactions sometimes entail a higher level of regulatory scrutiny or a greater risk of contingent liabilities. The complexity of these transactions could also make it more difficult to find a suitable buyer. Any of these risks could harm the performance of our funds.
Our investment funds make investments in companies that we do not control.
Investments by many of our investment funds will include debt instruments and equity securities of companies that we do not control. Such instruments and securities may be acquired by our investment funds through trading activities or through purchases of securities from the issuer. In addition, our funds may acquire minority equity interests in large transactions, which may be structured as “consortium transactions” due to the size of the investment and the amount of capital required to be invested. A consortium transaction involves an equity investment in which two or more private equity or other firms serve together or collectively as equity sponsors. We participated in a number of consortium transactions in prior years due to the increased size of many of the transactions in which we were involved. Consortium transactions generally entail a reduced level of control by our firm over the investment because governance rights must be shared with the other consortium sponsors. Accordingly, we may not be able to control decisions relating to a consortium investment, including decisions relating to the management and operation of the company and the timing and nature of any exit. Our funds may also dispose of a portion of their majority equity investments in portfolio companies over time in a manner that results in the funds retaining a minority investment. Those investments may be subject to the risk that the company in which the investment is made may make business, tax, legal, financial or management decisions with which we do not agree or that the majority stakeholders or the management of the company may take risks or otherwise act in a manner that does not serve our interests. If any of the foregoing were to occur, the value of investments by our funds could decrease and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could suffer as a result.

Our investment funds may invest in assets denominated in currencies whichthat differ from the currency in which the Fundfund is denominated.

When our investment funds invest in assets denominated in currencies that differ from the functional currency of the relevant fund, fluctuations in currency rates could impact the performance of thesuch investment funds. For example, Carlyle sponsors U.S. dollar-denominated funds that invest in assets denominated in foreign currencies such as our Buyout, Growth Capital,buyout and Real Estategrowth funds in Asia as well as our buyout funds inand South America and Africa.America. In the event that the U.S. dollar appreciates, the market value of the investments in these
76


funds will decline even if the underlying investments perform well in local currency. In addition, our Europe buyout and Growth Capitalgrowth funds in Europe are Euro-denominated and may have investments

59






denominated in U.S. Dollar, Greatdollar, British Pound,pound, or other currencies. In the event the Euro appreciates, the market value of investments in these funds would decline even if the underlying investments perform well in local currency.

We may employ hedging techniques to manage these risks, but we can offer no assurance that such strategies will be effective or tax-efficient. If we engage in hedging transactions, we may be exposed to additional risks associated with such transactions. See “—Risks“Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Risk management activities may adversely affect the return on our and our funds’ investments.” And “—Regulatoryinvestments” and “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business.”

Our funds make investments in companies that are based outside of the United States, which may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in companies that are based in the United States.
Many of our investment funds generally invest a significant portion of their assets in the equity, debt, loans or other securities of issuers that are headquartered outside of the United States, such as China, India, Indonesia and Latin America, MENA and Sub-Saharan Africa.America. A substantial amount of these foreign investments consistconsists of investments made by our carry funds. For example, as of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately 38%36% of the cumulative capital invested by our CorporateGlobal Private Equity Real Assets and Global Credit carry funds was attributable to foreign investments. Investments in non-U.S. securities involve risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. securities, including:
certain economic and political risks, including potential exchange control regulations and restrictions on our non-U.S. investments and repatriation of profits on investments or of capital invested, the risks of political, economic or social instability, the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation and adverse economic and political developments;

the imposition of non-U.S. taxes on gains from the sale of investments or other distributions by our funds;

the absence of uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and disclosure requirements and less government supervision and regulation;

changes in laws or clarifications to existing laws that could impact our tax treaty positions, which could adversely impact the returns on our investments;

limitations on the deductibility of interest for income tax purposes in certain jurisdictions;

differences in the legal and regulatory environment or enhanced legal and regulatory compliance;

limitations on borrowings to be used to fund acquisitions or dividends;

political hostility to investments by foreign or private equity investors, including increased risk of government expropriation;

less liquid markets;

reliance on a more limited number of commodity inputs, service providers and/or distribution mechanisms;

adverse fluctuations in currency exchange rates and costs associated with conversion of investment principal and income from one currency into another;

higher rates of inflation;

higher transaction costs;

less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers;

77


less developed bankruptcy, limited liability company, corporate, partnership and other laws (which may have the effect of disregarding or otherwise circumventing the limited liability structures potentially causing the actions or liabilities of one fund or a portfolio company to adversely impact us or an unrelated fund or portfolio company);


60






difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations;obligations (including, for example, purchase agreements and insurance policies);

less stringent requirements relating to fiduciary duties;

fewer investor protections and less publicly available information in respect of companies in non-U.S. markets; and

greater price volatility.
For example, the imposition of a new national security law has increased overall uncertainty about risks associated with international trade with Hong Kong, the potential for increased taxation on Hong Kong-related transactions, and new regulatory restrictions and data protection concerns for businesses operated in Hong Kong (including our Hong Kong operations). Moreover, in April 2020, the Government of India issued Press Note 3, which requires prior government approval of all foreign direct investment by non-resident entities located in, or having beneficial owners in, countries that share a land border with India. While further clarity is expected from the Government of India, the application of these rules may inhibit our funds’ ability to consummate investments in India and may require partial or full exclusion of any fund investor from countries bordering India from such investments. Uncertainty resulting from the application of these rules may also lead to higher amounts of, or longer durations of, borrowings by the investment funds pending the receipt of approvals, and we or our funds being subject to fines if different regulators apply and enforce the rules differently.
We operate in numerous national and subnational jurisdictions throughout the world and are subject to complex taxation requirements that could result in the imposition of taxes in excess of any amounts that are reserved
as a cash or financial statement matter for such purposes. In addition, the portfolio companies of our investment funds are typically subject to taxation in the jurisdictions in which they operate. It is possible that a taxing authority could take a contrary view of our tax position or there could be changes in law subsequent to the date of an investment in a particular portfolio company that will adversely affect returns from that investment, or adversely affect any prospective investments in a particular jurisdiction, for example as a result of new legislation in any such local jurisdiction affecting the deductibility of interest or other expenses related to acquisition financing.
In the event a portfolio company outside the United States experiences financial difficulties, we may consider local laws, corporate organizational structure, potential impacts on other portfolio companies in the region and other factors in developing our business response. Among other actions, we may seek to enhance the management team or make fund additional capital investments from our investment funds, our senior Carlyle professionals and/or us. To the extent we and/or certain of our senior Carlyle professionals fund additional capital into a company that is experiencing difficulties, we may be required to consolidate the entity into our financial statements under applicable U.S. GAAP. See “—Risks“Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure—Common Stock—The consolidation of investment funds, holding companies or operating businesses of our portfolio companies could make it more difficult to understand the operating performance of the PartnershipCompany and could create operational risks for the Partnership.Company.
Our funds’ investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies or that there will be changes in the cost of currency conversion and/or exchange control regulations. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, levels of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political developments. Additionally,In addition, the increase in the value of the dollar makes it more difficult for companies outside of the United States that depend on non-dollar revenues to repay or refinance their dollar liabilities and a stronger dollar also reduces the domestic value of the foreign sales and earnings of U.S.-based businesses.
Regulatory action to implement controls on foreign exchange and outbound remittances of currency could also impact the dollar value of investments proceeds, interest and dividends received by our investment funds, gains and losses realized on the sale of investments and the timing and amount of distributions, if any, made to us. For example, certain Asian countries, including China, have implemented stricter controls on foreign exchange and outbound remittances, and several governmental entities such as The Peoplesthe People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) have instituted additional
78


reporting, review and verification steps around control of outbound payments on capital account items. Furthermore,Moreover, in certain cases, our fund management fees are denominated in foreign currencies. With respect to those funds, we are subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies in which the fund has incurred expenses or has made investments.
We may need to pay “giveback” obligations if and when they are triggered under the governing agreements with our investors.
If, at the end of any of the life of our CPE, Real Assets and Global Credit carry funds (or earlier with respect to certain of our funds), the carry fund has not achieved investment returns that (in most cases) exceed the preferred return threshold or (in almost all cases) the general partner receives net profits over the life of the fund in excess of its allocable share under the applicable partnership agreement, we will be obligated to repay an amount equal to the extent to which carried interest that was previously distributed to us exceeds the amounts to which we are ultimately entitled. This repayment obligation is known as a “giveback” obligation. As of December 31, 2017, we had accrued a giveback obligation of $66.8 million, representing the giveback obligation that would need to be paid by the firm if the carry funds were liquidated at their current fair values at that date. The majority of these repayment obligations are related to amounts previously distributed to our senior Carlyle professionals prior to the completion of our initial public offering, with respect to which our common unitholders did not receive any benefit. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $28.9 million of the total accrued giveback obligation is

61






attributable to Carlyle Holdings, $27.4 million of which relates to the accrued giveback obligation from the Legacy Energy Funds.
When payment of a giveback obligation is anticipated (or "realized"), the portion of this liability that is expected to be borne by the unitholders (i.e., the amount not expected to be funded by Carlyle professionals) has the effect of reducing our Distributable Earnings, which therefore may result in a lower distribution to unitholders. Any remaining giveback obligation required to be funded on behalf of our funds (most of which is attributable to Energy IV and Renew II) would generally be due upon the liquidation of the remaining assets from the funds.
If, as of December 31, 2017, all of the investments held by our carry funds were deemed worthless, the amount of realized and distributed carried interest subject to potential giveback would have been $0.7 billion, on an after-tax basis where applicable. Since inception, we have paid $199.6 million in aggregate giveback obligations, which was funded primarily through collection of employee receivables related to giveback obligations and from Carlyle professionals and other non-controlling interests for their portion of the obligation.
Although a giveback obligation is several to each person who received a distribution, and not a joint obligation, the governing agreements of our funds generally provide that to the extent a recipient does not fund his or her respective share, then we may have to fund such additional amounts beyond the amount of carried interest we retained, although we generally will retain the right to pursue any remedies that we have under such governing agreements against those carried interest recipients who fail to fund their obligations. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $37.9 million of our $66.8 million accrued giveback obligation is attributable to various current and former senior Carlyle professionals. We have historically withheld a portion of the cash from carried interest distributions to individual senior Carlyle professionals and other employees as security for their potential giveback obligations. We also set aside cash reserves from carried interest we receive and retain for potential giveback obligations that we may be required to fund in the future. However, we have not set aside additional cash reserves relating to the secondary liability we retain for the giveback obligations attributable to our individual senior Carlyle professionals and other employees if they fail to satisfy these obligations. We may need to use or reserve cash to repay such giveback obligations instead of using the cash for other purposes. See “Part I. Item 1. Business—Structure and Operation of Our Investment Funds—Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Contractual Obligations—Contingent Obligations (Giveback)” and Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our investment funds often make preferred and common equity investments that rank junior to preferred equity and debt in a company’s capital structure.
In most cases, the companies in which our investment funds invest have, or are permitted to have, outstanding indebtedness or equity securities that rank senior to our fund’s investment. By their terms, such instruments may provide that their holders are entitled to receive payments of dividends, interest or principal on or before the dates on which payments are to be made in respect of our investment. Also,In addition, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a company in which an investment is made, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before distributions could be made in respect of our investment. After repaying senior security holders, the company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying amounts owed in respect of our investment. To the extent that any assets remain, holders of claims that rank equally with our investment would be entitled to share on an equal and ratable basis in distributions that are made out of those assets. Also,Moreover, during periods of financial distress or following an insolvency, the ability of our funds to influence a company’s affairs and to take actions to protect their investments may be substantially less than that of the senior creditors.
Third-party investors in substantially all of our carry funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause, to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause by a simple majority vote and to terminate the investment period under certain circumstances and investors in certain of the investment funds we advise may redeem their investments. These events would lead to a decrease in our revenues, which could be substantial.
The governing agreements of almost all of our carry funds provide that, subject to certain conditions, third-party investors in those funds have the right to remove the general partner of the fund for cause or to accelerate the liquidation date of the investment fund without cause by a simple majority vote, resulting in a reduction in management fees we would earn from such investment funds and a significant reduction in the expected amounts of total carried interest and incentive fees from those funds. Carried interest and incentive fees could be significantly reduced as a result of our inability to maximize the value of investments by an investment fund during the liquidation process or in the event of the triggering of a “giveback” obligation. Finally, the applicable funds would cease to exist after completion of liquidation and winding-up. In addition, the governing agreements of certain of our investment funds provide that in the event certain “key persons” in our investment funds do not meet specified time commitments with regard to managing the fund (for example, certain of the investment professionals serving on the investment committee or advising the fund), then investors in certain funds have the right to vote to terminate the

62






investment period by a simple majority vote in accordance with specified procedures, accelerate the withdrawal of their capital on an investor-by-investor basis, or the fund’s investment period will automatically terminate and the vote of a simple majority of investors is required to restart it. In addition to having a significant negative impact on our revenue, earnings and cash flow, the occurrence of such an event with respect to any of our investment funds would likely result in significant reputational damage to us and could negatively impact our future fundraising efforts.
The AlpInvest funds generally provide for suspension of the investment period if there is a key person event, the right of a supermajority of investors to remove the general partner with cause and, in some cases, without cause, but generally have not provided for liquidation without cause.
The latest generation of Metropolitan funds generally provide for suspension of the investment period if there is a key person event, the right of a supermajority of investors to remove the general partner with or without cause, and the right of a majority of investors to accelerate the liquidation date of the fund without cause by a simple majority vote.
Where AlpInvest and Metropolitan funds include “key person” provisions, they are focused on specific existing AlpInvest or Metropolitan personnel as applicable. While we believe that existing management have appropriate incentives to remain in their respective positions, based on equity ownership, profit participation and other contractual provisions, we are not able to guarantee the ongoing participation of the management team members in respect of the funds vehicles. In addition, certain AlpInvest and Metropolitan vehicles are structured as "fund-of-one" managed accounts which typically have a single investor or a few affiliated investors. The investor(s) in such vehicles may hold disproportionate authority over decisions reserved for third-party investors. Further, in many cases, such investors have bespoke rights allowing them to, among other things, terminate the investment period or cause a dissolution of the account or vehicle for a variety of reasons. To the extent these fund-of-one vehicles cease to invest or are dissolved, the fees generated by them may be reduced.
In addition, because our investment funds generally have an adviser that is registered under the Advisers Act, the management agreements of each of our investment funds would be terminated upon an “assignment” to a third-party of these agreements without appropriate investor consent, which assignment may be deemed to occur in the event these advisers were to experience a change of control. We cannot be certain that consents required to assignments of our investment management agreements will be obtained if a change of control occurs. “Assignment” of these agreements without investor consent could cause us to lose the fees we earn from such investment funds.

Third-party investors in our investment funds with commitment-based structures may not satisfy their contractual obligation to fund capital calls when requested by us, which could adversely affect a fund’s operations and performance.
Investors in our carry funds make capital commitments to those funds that we are entitled to call from those investors at any time during prescribed periods. We depend on investors fulfilling their commitments when we call capital from them in order for those funds to consummate investments and otherwise pay their obligations (for example, management fees) when due. Any investor that did not fund a capital call would generally be subject to several possible penalties, including having a significant amount of its existing investment forfeited in that fund. However, the impact of the penalty is directly correlated to the amount of capital previously invested by the investor in the fund and if an investor has invested little or no capital, for instance early in the life of the fund, then the forfeiture penalty may not be as meaningful. Investors may also negotiate for lesser or reduced penalties at the outset of the fund, thereby inhibiting our ability to enforce the funding of a capital call. Our use of subscription lines of credit to purchase an investment prior to calling capital from fund investors could increase the prevalence of defaulting limited partners. Should the value of an investment funded through a fund line-of-credit decline, especially early in a fund's life-cycle where minimal capital has been contributed by the fund's investors, a limited partner may decide not to fund its commitment. In addition, third-party investors in private equity, real estate assets and venture capital funds typically use distributions from prior investments to meet future capital calls. In cases where valuations of investors’ existing investments fall and the pace of distributions slows, investors may be unable to make new commitments to third-party managed investment funds such as those advised by us. If investors were to fail to satisfy a significant amount of capital calls for any particular fund or funds, the operation and performance of those funds could be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, our failure to comply with applicable pay-to-play laws, regulations and/or policies adopted by a number of states and municipal pension funds as well as the New York Attorney General’s Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct, may, in certain instances, excuse a public pension fund investor from its obligation to make further capital contributions relating to all or any part of an investment or allow it to withdraw from the fund. If a public pension fund investor were to seek to be excused from funding a significant amount of capital calls for any particular fund or funds, the operation and performance of those funds could be materially and adversely affected.

63






Our failure to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest in our investment business could damage our reputation and adversely affect our businesses.
As we have expanded and as we continue to expand the number and scope of our businesses, we increasingly confront potential conflicts of interest relating to our funds’ investment activities. For example, a decision to acquire material, non-public information about a company while pursuing an investment opportunity for a particular fund may give rise to a potential conflict of interest that results in our having to restrict the ability of other funds to take any action. Certain of our funds, managed accounts or investment vehicles may have overlapping investment objectives, including co-investment funds and funds that have different fee structures, and potential conflicts may arise with respect to our decisions regarding how to allocate investment opportunities among those funds, managed accounts or investors. Different private equity funds may invest in a single portfolio company, for example where the fund that made an initial investment no longer has capital available to invest. We may also cause different funds that we manage to purchase different classes of securities in the same portfolio company. For example, one of our funds could acquire a debt security issued by the same company in which one of our buyout funds owns common equity securities. A direct conflict of interest could arise between the debt holders and the equity holders if such a portfolio company was to develop insolvency concerns, and that conflict would have to be carefully managed by us. It is also possible that in the event the portfolio company goes through a bankruptcy proceeding, the interests of the fund holding the debt securities may be subordinated, recharacterized or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of the involvement and actions of the fund holding the equity in the portfolio company. In such a case, the debt security could be converted into equity and the prospects of repayment greatly diminished. Conflicts of interest may also exist in the valuation of our investments and regarding decisions about the allocation of specific investment opportunities among us and our funds and the allocation of fees and costs among us, our funds and their portfolio companies and conflicts could also arise in respect of the ultimate disposition of such investments. Due to recent changes in the tax treatment of carried interest under the TCJA, conflicts of interest may arise with investors in certain of our funds in connection with the general partner’s decisions with respect to the sequence and timing of disposals of investments in such funds. To the extent we fail to appropriately deal with any such conflicts, it could negatively impact our reputation and ability to raise additional funds and the willingness of counterparties to do business with us or result in regulatory liability or potential litigation against us.

Risk management activities may adversely affect the return on our and our funds’ investments.
When managing our exposure to market risks, we may (on our own behalf or on behalf of our funds) from time to time use forward contracts, options, swaps, caps, collars and floors or pursue other strategies or use other forms of derivative instruments to limit our exposure to changes in the relative values of investments that may result from market developments, including changes in prevailing interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The scope of risk management activities undertaken by us varies based on the level and volatility of interest rates, prevailing foreign currency exchange rates, the types of investments that are made and other changing market conditions. The use of hedging transactions and other derivative instruments to reduce the effects of a decline in the value of a position does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the value of the position or prevent losses if the value of the position declines. Such transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the value of a position increases. Moreover, it may not be possible to limit the exposure to a market development that is so generally anticipated that a hedging or other derivative transaction cannot be entered into at an acceptable price. The success of any hedging or other derivative transaction generally will depend on our ability to correctly predict market changes, the degree of correlation between price movements of a derivative instrument and the position being hedged, the creditworthiness of the counterparty and other factors. As a result, while we may enter into such a transaction in order to reduce our exposure to market risks, the transaction may result in poorer overall firm or investment performance than if it had not been executed. Such transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the value of a hedged position increases.

While such hedging arrangements may reduce certain risks, such arrangements themselves may entail certain other risks. These arrangements may require the posting of cash collateral at a time when a fund has insufficient cash or illiquid assets such that the posting of the cash is either impossible or requires the sale of assets at prices that do not reflect their underlying value. Moreover, these hedging arrangements may generate significant transaction costs, including potential tax costs, which may reduce the returns generated by the firm or a fund. See “—Rapidly changing regulations regarding derivatives and commodity interest transactions could adversely impact various aspects of our business."
Certain of our fund investments may be concentrated in particular asset types or geographic regions, which could exacerbate any negative performance of those funds to the extent those concentrated investments perform poorly.
The governing agreements of our investment funds contain only limited investment restrictions and only limited requirements as to diversification of fund investments, either by geographic region or asset type. For example, we advise funds that invest predominantly in the United States, Europe, Asia South America, Ireland, Peru,and Japan, or Sub-Saharan Africa; and we advise funds that invest in a single industry sector, such as financial services, aviation, and power. During periods of difficult market conditions, slowdowns, or slowdownsincreased borrower defaults in thesethose sectors or geographic regions, decreased revenue, difficulty in obtaining access to financing

64






and increased funding costs experienced by our funds may be exacerbated by this concentration of investments, which wouldcould result in lower investment returns for our funds. Such concentration may increase the risk that events affecting a specific geographic region or asset type willcould have an adverse or disparate impact on such investment funds, as compared to funds that invest more broadly. Idiosyncratic factors impacting specific companies or securities can materially affect fund performance depending on the size of the position.
Our energy business is involved in oil and gas exploration and development which involves a high degree of risk.
Our energy teams focus on investments in businesses involved in oil and gas exploration and development, which can be a speculative business involving a high degree of risk, including:

the use of new technologies;

reliance on estimates of oil and gas reserves in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each reservoir;

encountering unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoirs, blow-outs, equipment failures and other accidents in completing wells and otherwise, cratering, sour gas releases, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, adverse weather conditions, pollution, fires, spills and other environmental risks; and

the volatility of oil and natural gas prices.
While the price of oil generally increased in 2017, we continue to see volatility.  Prices for oil and natural gas are subject to wide fluctuation in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas as well as numerous additional factors such as market uncertainty, speculation, the level of consumer product demand, the refining capacity of oil purchasers, weather conditions, domestic and non-U.S. governmental regulations, the price and availability of alternative fuels, political conditions in the Middle East and Africa, actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, the non-U.S. supply of oil and natural gas, the price of non-U.S. imports and overall economic conditions. In addition, changes in commodity prices can vary widely from one location to the next depending upon the characteristics of the production and the availability of gathering, transportation, processing and storage facilities used to transport the oil and gas to markets. The increase in oil prices in 2017 had a positive impact on our natural resources and Legacy Energy portfolio which appreciated 30% and 6%, respectively, for the year.  In the event oil prices decline, it is possible our portfolio could be adversely impacted.
Our funds may utilize special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) to make investments in the energy industry. SPACs are publicly-traded companies that raise funds from public investors through an initial public offering (IPO) of units in order to compete an initial business combination within 24 months from the date of the IPO. If a SPAC does not complete the business combination within 24 months, our investment funds will bear certain sunk costs and the SPAC will dissolve.
Certain of our investment funds may invest in securities of companies that are experiencing significant financial or business difficulties, including companies involved in bankruptcy or other reorganization and liquidation proceedings. Such investments may be subject to a greater risk of poor performance or loss.
Certain of our investment funds, especially our distressed and corporate opportunities funds, may invest in business enterprises involved in work-outs, liquidations, reorganizations, bankruptcies and similar transactions and may purchase high risk receivables. An investment in such business enterprises entails the risk that the transaction in which such business enterprise is involved either will be unsuccessful, will take considerable time or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security the value of which will be less than the purchase price to the fund of the security or other financial instrument in respect of which such distribution is received. In addition, if an anticipated transaction does not in fact occur, the fund may be required to sell its investment at a loss. Investments in troubled companies may also be adversely affected by U.S. federal and state laws relating to, among other things, fraudulent conveyances, voidable preferences, lender liability and a bankruptcy court’s discretionary power to disallow, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims. Investments in securities and private claims of troubled companies made in connection with an attempt to influence a restructuring proposal or plan of reorganization in a bankruptcy case may also involve substantial litigation, which has the potential to adversely impact us or unrelated funds or portfolio companies. Because there isDue to the substantial uncertainty concerning the outcome of transactions involving financially troubled companies, there is a potential risk of loss by a fund of its entire investment in such company.

Contingent liabilities could harm fund performance.
We may cause our funds to acquire an investment that is subject to contingent liabilities. Such contingent liabilities could be unknown to us at the time of acquisition or, if they are known to us, we may not accurately assess or protect against the risks that they present. Acquired contingent liabilities could therefore result in unforeseen losses for our funds. In addition, in connection with the disposition of an investment in a portfolio company, a fund may be required to make representations
65
79







about the business and financial affairs of such portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. A fund may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations are inaccurate. These arrangements may result in the incurrence of contingent liabilities by a fund, even after the disposition of an investment. Accordingly, the inaccuracy of representations and warranties made by a fund could harm such fund’s performance.
We and our investment funds are subject to risks in using prime brokers, custodians, administrators and other agents and third-party service providers.
We and many of our investment funds depend on the services of prime brokers, custodians, administrators and other agents and third-party service providers to carry out certain securities transactions and other business functions.
The counterparty to one or more of our or our funds’ contractual arrangements could default on its obligations under the contract. If a counterparty defaults, we and our funds may be unable to take action to cover the exposure and we or one or more of our funds could incur material losses. Among other systems, our data security, data privacy, investor reporting and business continuity processes could be impacted by a third party’s inability or unwillingness to perform pursuant to our arrangements with them. In addition, we could suffer legal and reputational damage from such failure to perform if we are unable to satisfy our obligations under our contracts with third parties or otherwise and could suffer losses in the event we are unable to comply with certain other agreements. Moreover, under certain local clearing and settlement regimes, we or our funds could be subject to settlement discipline fines.
The terms of our contracts with third parties surrounding securities transactions are often customized and complex, and many of these arrangements occur in markets or relate to products that are not subject to regulatory oversight. In particular, some of our funds utilize prime brokerage arrangements with a relatively limited number of counterparties, which has the effect of concentrating the transaction volume (and related counterparty default risk) of these funds with these counterparties.
The consolidation and elimination of counterparties may increase our concentration of counterparty risk and decrease the number of potential counterparties. Our carry funds generally are not restricted from dealing with any particular counterparty or from concentrating any or all of their transactions with one counterparty. In the event of the insolvency of a party that is holding our assets or those of our funds as collateral, we and our funds may not be able to recover equivalent assets in full as we and our funds will rank among the counterparty’s unsecured creditors. In addition, our and our funds’ cash held with a prime broker, custodian or counterparty may not be segregated from the prime broker’s, custodian’s or counterparty’s own cash, and we and our funds therefore may rank as unsecured creditors in relation thereto. The inability to recover our or our investment funds’ assets could have a material impact on us or on the performance of our funds.
The investments of our private equity funds are subject to a number of inherent risks.
Our results are highly dependent on our continued ability to generate attractive returns from our investments. Investments made by our private equity funds involve a number of significant risks inherent to private equity investing, including the following:
we advise funds that invest in businesses that operate in a variety of industries that are subject to extensive domestic and foreign regulation, such as the telecommunications industry, the aerospace, defense and government services industry, the life sciences industry, and the healthcare industry (including companies that supply equipment and services to governmental agencies), that may involve greater risk due to rapidly changing market and governmental conditions in those sectors;
significant failures of our portfolio companies to comply with laws and regulations applicable to them may expose us to liabilities, fines or penalties, could affect the ability of our funds to invest in other companies in certain industries in the future and could harm our reputation;
companies in which private equity investments are made may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of their equity securities or any collateral or guarantees provided with respect to their debt;
companies in which private equity investments are made are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons and, as a result, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one
80


or more of those persons could have a material adverse impact on their business and prospects and the investment made;
companies in which private equity investments are made may be businesses or divisions acquired from larger operating entities which may require a rebuilding or replacement of financial reporting, information technology, back office and other operations;
companies in which private equity investments are made may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position;
companies in which private equity investments are made generally have less predictable operating results;
instances of fraud, corruption and other deceptive practices committed by senior management of portfolio companies in which our funds invest may undermine our due diligence efforts with respect to such companies and, upon the discovery of such fraud, negatively affect the valuation of a fund’s investments as well as contribute to overall market volatility that can negatively impact a fund’s investment program;
our funds may make investments that they do not advantageously dispose of prior to the date the applicable fund is dissolved, either by expiration of such fund’s term or otherwise, resulting in a lower than expected return on the investments and, potentially, on the fund itself;
our funds generally establish the capital structure of portfolio companies on the basis of the financial projections based primarily on management judgments and assumptions, and general economic conditions and other factors may cause actual performance to fall short of these financial projections, which could cause a substantial decrease in the value of our equity holdings in the portfolio company and cause our funds’ performance to fall short of our expectations;
under ERISA, a “trade or business” within a “controlled group” can be liable for the ERISA Title IV pension obligations (including withdrawal liability for union multiemployer plans) of any other member of the controlled group. This “controlled group” liability represents one of the few situations in which one entity’s liability can be imposed upon another simply because the entities are united by common ownership, but in order for such joint and several liability to be imposed, two tests must be satisfied: (1) the entity on which such liability is to be imposed must be a “trade or business” and (2) a “controlled group” relationship must exist among such entity and the pension plan sponsor or the contributing employer. While a number of cases have held that managing investments is not a “trade or business” for tax purposes, at least one federal circuit court case has concluded that an investment fund could be a “trade or business” for ERISA purposes (and, consequently, could be liable for underfunded pension liabilities of an insolvent portfolio company) based upon a number of factors present in that case, including the fund’s level of involvement in the management of its portfolio companies and the nature of its management fee arrangements. Litigation related to the circuit court’s decision suggests that additional factors may be relevant for purposes of determining whether an investment fund could face “controlled group” liability under ERISA, including the structure of the investment, and the nature of the fund’s relationship with other affiliated investors and co-investors in the portfolio company. Moreover, regardless of whether or not an investment fund is determined to be a trade or business for purposes of ERISA, a court may hold that one of the fund’s portfolio companies could become jointly and severally liable for another portfolio company’s unfunded pension liabilities pursuant to the ERISA “controlled group” rules, depending upon the relevant investment structures and ownership interests as noted above; and
executive officers, directors and employees of an equity sponsor may be named as defendants in litigation involving a company in which a private equity investment is made or is being made.
Our private equity funds’ performance, and our performance, has been and may in the future be adversely affected by the financial performance of our portfolio companies and the industries in which our funds invest.
Our performance and the performance of our private equity funds are significantly impacted by the value of the companies in which our funds have invested. Our funds invest in companies in many different industries, each of which is
81


subject to volatility based upon a variety of factors, including economic, market, and geopolitical factors. During recessions, periods of elevated uncertainty, or phases of challenging economic and market factors. Since theconditions such as today’s environment of high inflation, rapidly increasing interest rates, and global financial crisis,food and energy shortages, we have experienced and subsequent recovery has causedexperience significant fluctuations in the fair value of securities held by our funds. The concomitant recession and recovery in the real economy subsequentObstacles to the global financial crisis also exerted a significant impact on overall performance activity and the demands for many of the goods and services provided by portfolio companies of the funds we advise. Although the U.S. economy has registered eight consecutive years of growth in real GDP, there remain many obstacles to continued growth in the economynear-term are numerous, such as geopolitical events, increasedand domestic political uncertainty, the risk of rising interest rates or a flattening yield curve, weakening credit markets,persistently high inflation, sharp shifts in monetary and fiscal policy, depressed labor force participation, high levels of public debt, slowing population growth, supply chain pressures and potential economic crisesstress outside of the U.S.United States. These factors and other general economic trends are likely tocan impact the performance of portfolio companies in many industries and in particular, industries that anticipated that global GDP would quickly return to its pre-crisis trend.geographies. In addition, the value of our investments in portfolio companies in the financial services industry is impacted by the overall health and stability of the credit and equity markets. The U.S. dollar strengthened markedly in 2022, although it has retrenched somewhat from its peak. A rebound invery strong U.S. dollar depresses the strengthprofits of the U.S. Dollar could also increasedomestic companies with significant foreign revenues, increases default risk on U.S. dollar-denominated loans and bonds issued by businesses domiciled in emerging market economies (EMEs)(“EMEs”), particularlyand exacerbates food and energy crises in those economies whose currencies declined sharplyEMEs as most commodities are invoiced in dollars. A sustained period of elevated U.S. dollar value relative to the U.S. dollar between 2013global currencies would perpetuate and 2016.worsen these trends. An increase in emerging marketsmarket corporate or sovereign defaults could further impair funding conditions or depress asset prices in these economies.
The performance of our private equity funds, and our performance, may be adversely affected to the extent our fund portfolio companies experience adverse performance or additional pressure due to these downward trends.exogenous factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. For example, during 2022, we recorded an impairment charge of $4.0 million on certain acquired contractual rights related to Carlyle Aviation Partners as a result of impaired income streams from aircraft under lease in Russia. In addition, the performance of our investment funds and our portfolio companies may be adversely affected by increases in inflationary pressures such as employee wage growth or rising input costs, which could compress profit margins, particularly at our portfolio companies that are unable to effectively increase prices in response. With respect to real estate, various factors could have an adverse effect on investment performance, including, but not limited to, deflation in consumer prices, a low level of consumer confidence in the economy and/or the residential real estate market and rising mortgage interest rates. In response to financial difficulties that are currently being experienced or that may be experienced in the future by certain portfolio companies or real estate investments, we may consider legal, regulatory, tax or other factors in determining the steps we may take to support such companies or investments, which may include enhancing the management team or funding additional capital investments from our investment funds, our senior Carlyle professionals and/or us. The actions we may take to support companies or investments experiencing financial difficulties may not be successful in remedying the financial difficulties and our investment funds, our senior Carlyle professionals or we may not recoup some or all of any capital investments made in support of such companies or investments. To the extent we and/or certain of our senior Carlyle professionals fund additional capital into a portfolio company or real estate investment that is experiencing difficulties, we may be required to consolidate such entity into our financial statements under applicable U.S. GAAP. See “—
Industry Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure-The consolidation of investment funds, holding companies or operating businesses of our portfolio companies could make it more difficult to understand the operating performance of the Partnership and could create operational risks for the Partnership.”

The financial projections of our portfolio companies could prove inaccurate.

Assets We Manage
Our funds generally establish the capital structure of portfolio companies on the basis of financial projections prepared by the management of such portfolio companies. These projected operating results will normally be based primarily on judgments of the management of the portfolio companies. In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the projections are developed. General economic conditions, which are not predictable, along with other factors may cause actual performance to fall short of the financial projections that were used to establish a given portfolio company’s capital structure. Because of the leverage that we typically employ in our investments, this could cause a substantial decrease in the value of our equity holdings in the portfolio company. The inaccuracy of financial projections could thus cause our funds’ performance to fall short of our expectations.

Contingent liabilities could harm fund performance.

We may cause our funds to acquire an investment that is subject to contingent liabilities. Such contingent liabilities could be unknown to us at the time of acquisition or, if they are known to us, we may not accurately assess or protect against the risks that they present. Acquired contingent liabilities could thus result in unforeseen losses for our funds. In addition, in connection with the disposition of an investment in a portfolio company, a fund may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of such portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. A fund may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations are inaccurate. These arrangements may result in the incurrence of contingent liabilities by a fund, even after the disposition of an investment. Accordingly, the inaccuracy of representations and warranties made by a fund could harm such fund’s performance.


66






We and our investmentreal estate funds are subject to risks inherent in using prime brokers, custodians, administratorsthe ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
    Investments in our real estate funds will be subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets. These risks include the following:
those associated with the burdens of ownership of real property;
general and local economic conditions;
changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for instance, of overbuilding);
fluctuations in the average occupancy and room rates for hotel and student housing properties;
population and demographic shifts;
the financial resources of tenants;
changes in building, environmental, zoning and other agentslaws;
restrictive covenants, encumbrances and third-party service providers.other land or use restrictions;

82


Wefailure to obtain necessary approvals and/or permits;
energy and manysupply shortages;
casualty or condemnation losses;
various uninsured or uninsurable risks;
natural disasters, including increased physical risks from climate change such as event-driven exposures resulting from the increased severity of extreme weather events, such as cyclones, hurricanes or floods, and consequences of longer-term shifts in climate patterns, for example, sustained higher temperatures that may cause sea levels to rise or chronic heat waves, and the effects of climate change on supply and demand;
changes in government regulations (such as rent control and those intended to address climate change);
changes in the way real estate is occupied as a result of pandemics or other unforeseen events;
changes in real property tax rates and operating expenses;
changes in interest rates;
the reduced availability of mortgage funds or other forms of financings, including construction financing, which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable;
inability to meet debt obligations;
breaches by third parties of their contractual obligations, including ground lessors, ground lessees, landlords and tenants;
claims by third parties, including adjacent landowners, and homeowners associations;
negative developments in the economy that depress travel and leasing activity or rents;
environmental liabilities;
contingent liabilities on disposition of assets;
increase in insurance premiums and changes to the insurance market;
unexpected cost overruns and delays in connection with development projects;
terrorist attacks, war and other factors that are beyond our control; and
dependence on local operating partners.
Our real estate funds’ portfolio investments are subject to various risks that cause fluctuations in occupancy, rental rates, operating income and expenses or that render the sale or financing of the funds’ portfolio investment properties difficult or unattractive, which risks have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, following the termination or expiration of a tenant’s lease, there could be a period of time before a funds’ portfolio investment will begin receiving rental payments under a replacement lease. During that period, the portfolio investments (and indirectly, the funds) will continue to bear fixed expenses such as interest, real estate taxes, maintenance and other operating expenses. In addition, declining economic conditions could impair the portfolio investments’ ability to attract replacement tenants and achieve rental rates equal to or greater than the rents paid under previous leases. Increased competition for tenants would require the portfolio investments to make capital improvements to properties that we would not otherwise have planned. Any unbudgeted capital improvements that a fund undertakes may divert cash that would otherwise be available for distribution to investors. To the extent that the portfolio investments are unable to renew leases or re-let spaces as leases expire, decreased cash flow from tenants will result, which would adversely impact the relevant fund’s returns. Our real estate funds may also make investments in residential real estate projects and/or otherwise participate in financing opportunities relating to residential real estate assets or portfolios
83


thereof from time to time, which may be more highly susceptible to adverse changes in prevailing economic and/or market conditions and present additional risks relative to the ownership and operation of commercial real estate assets.
With regard to potential environmental liabilities, ownership of real assets in our investment funds dependor vehicles may increase our risk of liability under laws that impose, regardless of fault, joint and several liability for the cost of remediating contamination and compensation for damages. In addition, changes in environmental laws or regulations or the environmental condition of an investment may create liabilities that did not exist at the time of acquisition. For example, the current Administration announced several initiatives and have proposed new regulations focused on the servicesclimate crisis that could impact our real estate assets in various ways that were not considered at the time of prime brokers, custodians, administratorsinvestment. Even in cases where we are indemnified by a seller against liabilities arising out of violations of environmental laws and regulations, there can be no assurance as to the financial viability of the seller to satisfy such indemnities or our ability to achieve enforcement of such indemnities.
In addition to real property assets, our real estate funds may also invest in real estate related operating companies such as logistics hubs and data centers. These investments are similar to the portfolio investments made by our buyout and growth funds and are subject to similar risks and uncertainties as apply to those operating companies. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—The investments of our private equity funds are subject to a number of inherent risks.”
Real estate markets may experience sharp increases in capitalization rates and declines in value as a result of overall economic decline and the limited availability of financing and the value of certain investments in our real estate funds may decline significantly. In addition, if our real estate funds acquire direct or indirect interests in undeveloped land or underdeveloped real property, which may often be non-income producing, they will be subject to the risks normally associated with such assets and development activities, including risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other agentsregulatory or environmental approvals, the cost and third-party service providers to carry out certain securities transactions and other business functions.

The counterparty to one or moretimely completion of construction (including risks beyond the control of our fund, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages) and the availability of both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. Moreover, our real estate funds’ properties are often managed by a third party, which makes us dependent upon such third parties and subjects us to risks associated with the actions of such third parties. Any of these factors may cause the value of the investments in our real estate funds to decline, which may have a material impact on our results of operations.
In addition, lenders in commercial real estate financing have been requiring a non-recourse carveout guarantee and environmental indemnity, which typically provides that the lender can recover losses from guarantors for certain bad acts, such as fraud or intentional misrepresentation, intentional waste, willful misconduct, criminal acts, misappropriation of funds, voluntary incurrence of prohibited debt and environmental losses sustained by lender. For our acquisitions, non-recourse carveout guarantees and environmental indemnities may be extended by our funds. We expect that commercial real estate financing arrangements generally will increasingly continue to require non-recourse carveout guarantees and environmental indemnities. In addition, lenders may require interest, carry and/or payment guarantees in connection with a real estate financing arrangement, which may be provided by the fund. In the event that any such guarantee or indemnity is called, a fund’s or our funds’ contractual arrangementsassets could default on its obligations under the contract. If a counterparty defaults,be negatively impacted and we andor our funds may be unablesubject to take actionliability.
The acquisition, ownership and disposition of real properties carry certain specific litigation risks. Litigation may be commenced with respect to covera property acquired in relation to events or circumstances relating to periods prior to the exposure and weacquisition of such property. In addition, at the time of disposition, other potential buyers may bring claims related to the asset or onefor due diligence expenses or moreother damages. After the sale of a real estate asset, buyers may later sue our funds could incur material losses. Amongor us for losses associated with latent defects or other systems,problems not uncovered in due diligence. Litigation can arise for events or circumstances that occur or are alleged to occur during the ownership period.
We or our data security, data privacy, investor reportingfunds may also be subject to certain risks associated with investments and, business continuity processes couldin particular, real estate-related assets. Real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and other types of owners may be impactedaffected by changes in the value of their underlying properties and defaults by borrowers or tenants, and in the case of REITS, changes in tax laws or by a third party's inability or unwillingness to perform pursuant to our arrangements with them.  In addition, we could suffer legal and reputational damage from such failure to perform if we are then unablequalify for tax-free pass through income could impair a REIT’s ability to satisfy our obligations under our contractsgenerate cash flows to make distributions. Qualification as a REIT also depends on a REIT’s ability to meet various requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which relate to organizational structure, annual distributions, diversity of stock ownership, and certain restrictions with third parties regard to the nature of their assets and the sources of their income. If a REIT fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates, and applicable state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to its stockholders.
84


Investments in real estate debt investments may be unsecured and/or otherwisesubordinated to a substantial amount of indebtedness and could suffer lossesmay not be protected by financial covenants. Non-performing real estate loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or modification, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the event weinterest rate and a substantial write-down of the principal of such loan. Investments in commercial mortgage loans are unable to comply with certain other agreements. 

The terms of our contracts with third parties surrounding securities transactions are often customized and complex, and many of these arrangements occur in markets or relate to products that are not subject to regulatory oversight. In particular, somerisks of our funds utilize prime brokerage arrangements with a relatively limited numberdelinquency, foreclosure and loss of counterparties, which has the effect of concentrating the transaction volume (and related counterparty default risk) of these funds with these counterparties.

The consolidation and elimination of counterparties resulting from the disruption in the financial markets has increased our concentration of counterparty risk and has decreased the number of potential counterparties. Our carry funds generally are not restricted from dealing with any particular counterparty or from concentrating any or all of their transactions with one counterparty.principal. In the event of the insolvency ofany default under a party that is holding our assetsmortgage loan held directly by us or thoseone of our funds, we or our fund will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the loan. Investments in distressed assets or businesses may have little or no near-term cash flow, involve a high degree of risk and, if subject to bankruptcy or insolvency, could be subordinated or disallowed.
Our energy business is involved in oil and gas investments (i.e, exploration, production, storage, transportation, logistics, refining, marketing, trading, petrochemicals, energy services and other opportunistic investments), which entail a high degree of risk.
Our energy teams focus on investments in businesses involved in oil and gas production, development and exploration, which can be a speculative business involving a high degree of risk, including:
the use of new technologies;
reliance on estimates of oil and gas reserves in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each reservoir;
encountering unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoirs, blow-outs, equipment failures and other accidents in completing wells and otherwise, cratering, sour gas releases, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, adverse weather conditions, pollution, fires, spills and other environmental risks;
the volatility of oil and natural gas prices and its impact on the demand for oil and gas products and services (climate change related or otherwise); and
potential contributions to anthropogenic climate change, as collateral,well as regulations and stakeholder scrutiny related to the same.
In order to better manage these risks, we seek to help a subset of companies accelerate progress related to climate change and the energy transition. For example, we help select companies to measure, monitor, and manage their carbon emissions, set decarbonization goals and associated pathways, and consider investments in new technologies to build additional long-term value in these companies, and position them to find opportunities in response to changing market dynamics; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful.
Oil, gas and product prices are subject to international supply and demand dynamics and, as a consequence, related margins can be volatile. In 2020, demand was negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which triggered unprecedented global and local travel restrictions as well as regional and nationwide quarantines. In some regions, including China, these restrictions continue today. At the same time, supply was affected by the inability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to agree to crude production curtailments in the first half of 2020. The resultant supply surplus triggered accumulation of substantial inventories of crude oil and refined products. Together, these phenomena resulted in a large drop in crude oil prices, lower gas prices, and lower refining margins. In 2021, however, oil and gas prices rebounded sharply and rapidly, as stronger-than-expected demand outpaced sluggish supply. In particular, European consumers and businesses faced energy supply shortages and high prices heading into 2022. The supply-demand imbalance was further compounded by the beginning of the war in Ukraine in February 2022 and the introduction of various sanctions against Russia that followed. The European energy situation could further deteriorate in the near- and medium-term if events between Russia, Ukraine and NATO continue to escalate. Faced with this energy crisis, certain European countries have introduced or are considering the introduction of additional taxes on local energy producers, including some of our fundsexisting investments. In general, political developments, see-sawing supply-demand dynamics, technological change, global macroeconomic conditions, public health risks and changes in the influence of OPEC may notcontinue to impact commodity prices going forward and the financial performance of some of our existing and future investments. Our investments that are exposed to energy prices, either as consumers or producers of energy, and their financial performance has been, and is likely to continue to be, ableaffected by the continued volatility in energy prices. To the extent that current conditions persist or worsen, there may be adverse impacts on
85


the financial performance of the affected businesses, on the availability of financing or credit to recover equivalent assetsthem as well as their asset prices and valuations.
Oil prices tend to experience significant volatility in fullresponse to macroeconomic trends, trade developments, geopolitical events, and data on inventories, global demand, future supply, and U.S. dollar strength. Oil’s strong performance in 2022, ending the year 10% above 2021 levels, is largely attributable to increased demand, persistent global supply discipline and global commodity market dislocations as wea result of sanctions against Russia.Prices for oil and our funds will rank amongnatural gas are subject to wide fluctuation in response to relatively minor changes in the counterparty’s unsecured creditors.supply of and demand for oil and natural gas as well as numerous additional factors such as market uncertainty, speculation, the level of consumer product demand, the refining capacity of oil purchasers, weather conditions, domestic and non-U.S. governmental regulations, appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar, the price and availability of alternative fuels, political conditions in the Middle East, Africa, and Eastern Europe, actions of the OPEC, the non-U.S. supply of oil and natural gas, U.S. and global inventories, the price of non-U.S. imports and overall economic conditions. In addition, changes in commodity prices can vary widely from one location to the next depending upon the characteristics of the production and the availability of gathering, transportation, processing and storage facilities used to transport the oil and gas to markets. In the event that oil prices decline sharply in the future, or fail to sustain upward price momentum, it is possible our portfolio could be adversely impacted. In the event that global commodity market dislocations persist and energy prices stay elevated or increase sharply in the future, it is possible that our funds’ cash heldportfolio could be adversely impacted by potential changes in the fiscal regimes that the host countries of our investments apply to energy producers.
In response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, and the developing legal and geopolitical response, we are monitoring exposure to Russia, Ukraine and Belarus across our global portfolio from an economic, legal and human capital perspective. We are working closely with external sanctions counsel to stay abreast of rapidly evolving sanctions and geopolitical risks and to help support compliance across the portfolio. Given the nature of the industry in which our energy teams invest, there are necessarily connections to Russian-owned oil and gas companies. These connections, and other dealings with Russian-owned oil and gas companies, are under close scrutiny in light of geopolitical considerations. Given this, there is a prime broker, custodian or counterparty may not be segregated fromrisk that national and international sanctions related to the prime broker’s, custodian’s or counterparty’s own cash,war in Ukraine, and weassociated compliance and our funds therefore may rank as unsecured creditors in relation thereto. The inability to recover our or our investment funds’ assetsregulatory issues, could have a material impact on us or onour business. To date, however, we have not identified any matters that trigger adverse regulatory concerns as a result of such sanctions.
In January 2021, the performancecurrent Administration issued an executive order, “Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of our funds.

America by All of America’s Workers,” which has the potential to impact federal contractors and certain grant and loan recipients and their contractors. While the only immediate impact of the order is the creation of a “Made in America” Office within the Office of Management and Budget to review federal agency waiver requests, the longer-term impact of potential changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation and statutory exemptions for commercial item information technology and trade agreements and the change in waiver procedures requirements for certain grant and loan programs could impact certain investments.
Investments in the natural resources industry, including the infrastructure and power industry,industries, involve various operational, construction and regulatory risks.
Investment in infrastructure assets involves certain differentiated risks. Project revenues can be affected by a number of factors. Unanticipated changes in the availability or price of inputs necessary for the operation of infrastructure assets may adversely affect the overall profitability of the investment or related project. Events outside the control of a portfolio company, such as political action, governmental regulation (including potential climate change initiatives), demographic changes, economic growth, increasing fuel prices, government macroeconomic policies, service or product prices, social stability, competition from other businesses and infrastructure, natural disasters (climate change related or otherwise), changes in weather patterns, changes in demand for products or services, bankruptcy or financial difficulty of a major customer and acts of war or terrorism, could significantly reduce the revenues generated or significantly increase the expense of constructing, operating, maintaining or restoring infrastructure facilities. In turn, this may impair a portfolio company’s ability to repay its debt, make distributions or even result in termination of an applicable concession or other agreement. Although portfolio companies may maintain insurance to protect against certain risks, where available on reasonable commercial terms (such as business interruption insurance that is intended to offset loss of revenues during an operational interruption), such insurance is subject to customary deductibles and coverage limits and may not be sufficient to recoup all of an investment’s losses. Moreover, once infrastructure assets of investments become operational, they may face competition from other infrastructure assets in the vicinity of the assets they operate, the presence of which depends in part on governmental plans and policies, over which we have no control.
86


Infrastructure investments are subject to substantial government regulation and governments have considerable discretion to implement regulations that could affect the business of infrastructure investing. In many instances, the operation or acquisition of infrastructure assets involves an ongoing commitment to or from a governmental agency, and the operation of infrastructure assets often relies on government permits, licenses, concessions, leases or contracts. The nature of these obligations and dependencies expose the owners of infrastructure assets to a higher level of regulatory control than typically imposed on other businesses, resulting in government entities having significant influence over such owners.
Where a portfolio company holds a concession or lease from the government, the concession or lease may restrict the portfolio company’s ability to operate the business in a way that maximizes cash flows and profitability. The lease or concession may also contain clauses more favorable to the government counterparty than a typical commercial contract. For instance, the lease or concession may enable the government to terminate the lease or concession in certain circumstances without requiring payment of adequate compensation.
The development, operation and maintenance of power generation or infrastructure facilities involves various operational risks, which can include mechanical and structural failure, accidents, labor issues or the failure of technology to perform as anticipated. Events outside our control, such as economic developments, changes in fuel prices or the price of other feedstocks, governmental policies, demand for energy and similar events, could materially reduce the revenues generated or increase the expenses of constructing, operating, maintaining or restoring power generation businesses. Such developments could impair a portfolio company’s ability to repay its debt or conduct its operations. We may also choose to or be required to decommission a power generation facility or other asset. The decommissioning process could be protracted and result in the incurrence of significant financial and/or regulatory obligations or other uncertainties.
Our natural resource portfolio companies may also face construction and operational risks typical for energy, infrastructure and power generation and related infrastructure businesses, including, without limitation:
labor disputes, work stoppages or shortages of skilled labor;

shortages of fuels or materials;

slower than projected construction progress and the unavailability or late delivery of necessary equipment;

delays caused by or in obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals or permits;

adverse weather conditions and unexpected construction conditions;

accidents or the breakdown or failure of construction equipment or processes;

difficulties in obtaining suitable or sufficient financing; and

force majeure or catastrophic events such as explosions, fires and terrorist activities and other similar events beyond our control.

67






Such developments could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, and could prevent completion of construction activities once undertaken. Construction costs may exceed estimates for various reasons, including inaccurate engineering and planning, labor and building material costs in excess of expectations and unanticipated problems with project start-up. Such unexpected increases may result in increased debt service costs and funds being insufficient to complete construction. Portfolio investments under development or portfolio investments acquired to be developed may receive little or no cash flow from the date of acquisition through the date of completion of development and may experience operating deficits after the date of completion. In addition, market conditions may change during the course of development that make such development less attractive than at the time it was commenced. Any events of this nature could severely delay or prevent the completion of, or significantly increase the cost of, the construction. In addition, there are risks inherent in the construction work whichthat may give rise to claims or demands against one of our portfolio companies from time to time. Delays in the completion of any energy or power project may result in lost revenues or increased expenses, including higher operation and maintenance costs related to such portfolio company.
We may acquire equity interests in development projects, including, without limitation, transmission and power facility developments and/or in businesses that engage in transmission and power facility development. To the extent that we invest in such development activities, it will be subject to the risks normally associated with such activities. Such risks include,
87


without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks beyond our control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages) and the availability of both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken, any of which could have an adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations.
Investments in electric utility industries both in the United States and abroad continue to experience increasing competitive pressures, primarily in wholesale markets, as a result of consumer demands, technological advances, greater availability of natural gas and other factors. Changes in regulation may support not only consolidation among domestic utilities, but also the disaggregation of vertically integrated utilities into separate generation, transmission and distribution businesses. As a result, additional significant competitors could become active in the independent power industry.
We invest in companies that produce hydrocarbons, the combustion of which releases greenhouse gases linked to climate change. Governmental and regulatory bodies, investors, consumers, and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on combatting climate change and a number of jurisdictions have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These include adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, restrictive permitting, increased efficiency standards, climate-related reporting, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy, among others. Compliance with these regulatory requirements could be costly, lengthen project implementation times, and, together with changes in consumer preferences and technological advances in the alternative energy sector, reduce demand for hydrocarbons, as well as shift hydrocarbon demand toward relatively lower-carbon sources such as natural gas. Current and pending greenhouse gas regulations or policies may also increase compliance costs for us and/or our portfolio companies, such as for monitoring or sequestering emissions, and promote alternatives to hydrocarbons. Companies that produce hydrocarbons are also increasingly subject to the risk of activism, litigation, and regulatory enforcement related to such companies’ operations, or actual or alleged environmental impacts, as well as increased scrutiny from lenders with regards to sustainability considerations. Such requirements, as well as social, economic, and technological developments, could have a negative impact on our ability to obtain suitable or sufficient financing, exit certain of our energy investments or adversely affect the expected returns of new investment opportunities.
The energy, infrastructure, power and energynatural resource sectors are the subject of substantialto comprehensive United States and complexnon-U.S. federal, state and local laws rules and regulation.regulations. These regulators include the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “FERC”), which has jurisdiction over the transmission and wholesale sale of electricity in interstate commerce and over the transportation, storage and certain sales of natural gas in interstate commerce, including the rates, charges and other terms and conditions for such services, respectively and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (“NERC”(the “NERC”), the purpose of which is to establish and enforce reliability standards applicable to all users, owners and operators of the bulk power system. These regulators derive their authority from, among other laws, the Federal Power Act, as amended (the “FPA”), The Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Natural Gas Act, as amended (the “NGA”) and state and perhaps, local public utility laws. OnAt the state level, some state laws require approval from the state commission before an electric utility operating in the state may divest or transfer electric generation facilities. Most state laws require approval from the state commission before an electric utility company operating in the state may divest or transfer distribution facilities. Failure to comply with applicable laws, rules regulations and standards could result in the prevention of operation of certain facilities or the prevention of the sale of such a facility to a third party, as well as the loss of certain rate authority, refund liability, penalties and other remedies, all of which could result in additional costs to a portfolio company and adversely affect the investment results. In addition, any legislative efforts by the current administration or Congress to overturn or modify policies or regulations enacted by the prior administration that placedand to place additional limitations on coal and gas electric generation, mining and/or exploration could adversely affect our alternative energy investments.
Investments may not receive the initial regulatory approval or license needed to acquire or otherwise operate an investment, including after substantial costs have been incurred pursuing such investment. Additional or unanticipated regulatory approvals, including, without limitation, renewals, extensions, transfers, assignments, reissuances or similar actions, may be required to acquire or operate infrastructure assets, and additional approvals may become applicable in the future due to a change in laws and regulations, a change in the portfolio company’s customer(s) or for other reasons. Moreover, permits or special rulings may be required on taxation, financial and regulatory related issues. There can be no assurance that a portfolio company will be able to (i) obtain all required regulatory approvals that it does not yet have or that it may require in the future, (ii) obtain any necessary modifications to existing regulatory approvals, or (iii) maintain required regulatory approvals. Any delay in obtaining or failure to obtain and maintain in full force and effect any regulatory approvals, or amendments thereto, or delay or failure to satisfy any regulatory conditions or other applicable requirements could prevent operation of a facility, sales to third parties or could result in additional costs and adversely impact the returns generated by the investment.
88


Environmental laws, regulations and regulatory initiatives (including potential climate change initiatives) play a significant role in the power, infrastructure and renewable and alternative energy industry and can have a substantial impact on investments in this industry. A portfolio company’s projects may be subject to changing and increasingly stringent environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and permit requirements. For example, global initiatives to minimize pollution have played a major role in the increase in demand for natural gas and alternative energy sources, creating numerous new investment opportunities. Conversely, required expenditures for environmental compliance have adversely impacted investment returns in a number of segments of the industry. The energy and power industry will continue to face considerable oversight from environmental regulatory authorities and significant influence from non-governmental organizations and special interest groups. Our investment funds may invest in portfolio companies that are subject to changing and increasingly stringent environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and permit requirements.
Estimates of factors such as solar energy intensity and movement of wind and water flow (for solar, wind and hydroelectric power, respectively) by qualified engineers are often a key factor in valuing certain energy and power companies. The process of making these estimates is complex, requiring significant decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. Estimates or projections of market conditions and supply and demand dynamics are key factors in evaluating potential investment opportunities and valuing the investments and related assets. The aforementioned estimates are subject to wide variances based on changes in market conditions, underlying assumptions and technical or investment-related assumptions.
The operation and financial performance of any renewable energy investment will be significantly dependent on governmental policy changes encouraging resource extraction couldpolicies and regulatory frameworks that support renewable energy sources. Investments in renewable energy and related businesses and/or assets currently enjoy support from national, state and local governments and regulatory agencies designed to finance or support the financing development thereof, such as the U.S. federal investment tax credit and federal production tax credit, U.S. Department of the Treasury grants, various renewable and alternative portfolio standard requirements enacted by several states, renewable energy credits and state-level utility programs, such as system benefits charge and customer choice programs. Similar support, initiatives and arrangements exist in non-U.S. jurisdictions as well, such as in the European Union. Non-U.S. jurisdictions may have themore variable views on policies regarding renewable energy (and, for example, may be more willing or likely to abandon initiatives regarding renewable energy in favor of more carbon-intensive forms of traditional energy generation). The combined effect of holding downthese programs is to subsidize in part the development, ownership and operation of renewable energy prices, whichprojects, particularly in an environment where the low cost of fossil fuel may otherwise make the cost of producing energy from renewable sources uneconomic. There can be no assurance that government support for renewable energy will continue, that favorable legislation will pass, or that the electricity produced by the renewable energy investments will continue to qualify for support through the RPS programs. The elimination of, or reduction in, government policies (including favorable tax policies) that support renewable energy could have a negativematerial adverse effect on a renewable energy portfolio company’s financial condition or results of operation. Conversely, because policies favoring renewable energy initiatives may involve economic disincentives on more carbon-intensive forms of traditional energy generation, such policies may adversely affect other investments that do not involve renewable energy projects.
Climate change and regulatory and other efforts to reduce climate change could adversely affect our business.
We and our funds’ portfolio companies face a number of risks associated with climate change, including both transition and physical risks. The transition risks that could impact our Company and our funds’ investments in portfolio companies include those risks related to the impact of U.S. and foreign climate-and ESG-related legislation and regulation, as well as risks arising from climate-related business trends. Moreover, we and our funds’ investments in portfolio companies are subject to risks stemming from the physical impacts of climate change.
New climate change-related regulations or interpretations of existing laws may result in enhanced disclosure obligations that could negatively affect us or our funds’ investments in portfolio companies and also materially increase our regulatory burden. Increased regulations generally increase the costs to us, our funds and our funds’ portfolio companies, and those higher costs may continue to increase if new laws require additional resources, including spending more time, hiring additional personnel or investing in new technologies. Moreover, significant increases in regulatory compliance expenses may negatively impact our funds and their portfolio company investments. In particular, compliance with climate- and other ESG-related rules in the EU is expected to result in increased legal and compliance costs and expenses, which would be borne by us, our funds and/or our funds’ portfolio companies. In addition, our funds’ portfolio companies could face transition risk if carbon-related regulations or taxes are implemented. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business” and “Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders on ESG matters, including our ESG reporting, exposes us to reputational and other risks.”
89


We also face business trend-related climate risks. Certain fund investors are increasingly taking into account ESG factors, including climate risks, in determining whether to invest in the funds we manage. In addition, our reputation and investor relationships could be damaged as a result of our involvement, or our funds’ involvement, in certain industries, portfolio companies or transactions associated with activities perceived to be causing or exacerbating climate change, as well as any decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to considerations relating to climate change.
Moreover, significant physical effects of climate change, including extreme weather events, such as hurricanes or floods, can also have an adverse impact on certain of our energy investments.

funds’ investments in portfolio companies and other investments, especially real asset and infrastructure investments and portfolio companies that rely on physical factories, plants or stores located in affected areas. As the effects of climate change increase, we expect the frequency and impact of weather and climate related events and conditions to increase as well.
Our CLO business and investment into CLOs involves certain risks.
    CLOs may present risks similar to other types of debt obligations and, in fact, such risks may be of greater significance in the case of CLOs. For example, investments in structured vehicles, including equity and junior debt securities issued by CLOs, involve risks, such as credit risk and market risk. Changes in interest rates and credit quality may cause short-term price fluctuations or longer term impairment. In addition, a reduction in the liquidity of the credit markets may result in an increase in credit spreads and a decline in ratings, performance and market values for leveraged loans. We have significant exposure to these markets through our investment in our CLO funds.
    In addition to the general risks associated with investing in debt securities, CLO securities carry additional risks, including, but not limited to, the possibility that distributions from collateral assets will be inadequate to make interest or other payments and the quality of the collateral may decline in value, default or be downgraded. Moreover, changes in the collateral held by a CLO may cause payments on the instruments we hold to be reduced, either temporarily or permanently. Non-payment could result in a reduction of our income and revenues. CLOs are less liquid than other types of securities and may be more volatile than the individual assets that make-up the CLOs. In addition, CLOs and other structured finance securities may be subject to prepayment risk. Further, the performance of a CLO or other structured finance security is generally affected by a variety of factors, including the security’s priority in the capital structure of the issuer thereof, the availability of any credit enhancement, the level and timing of payments and recoveries on and the characteristics of the underlying receivables, loans or other assets that are being securitized, remoteness of those assets from the originator or transferor, the adequacy of and ability to realize upon any related collateral and the capability of the servicer of the securitized assets. There are also risks that the trustee of a CLO does not properly carry out its duties to the CLO, potentially resulting in loss to the CLO. Moreover, the complex structure of the security may produce unexpected investment results, especially during times of market stress or volatility. Investments in structured finance securities may also be subject to liquidity risk.
During 2022, we earned approximately $193 million in management fees from our CLOs, prior to the effects of consolidation, of which approximately 62% are in the form of subordinated fees. The subordinated fees we generate from our CLO business could be negatively impacted if one or more CLOs fail certain tests related to overcollateralization (including the interest diversion test) set forth in their respective indentures. In the event that worsening credit conditions and/or a deterioration in loan performance generally leads to defaults or downgrades of the CLOs’ underlying collateral obligations, one or more CLOs could fail one or more overcollateralization tests and/or interest diversion tests. These risks are correlated, as when an underlying collateral obligation defaults or is downgraded below a certain threshold, such collateral obligation is then carried below par for the purpose of overcollateralization and interest diversion testing, making a failure of any such test more likely to occur. Any such failure would result in funds otherwise available to pay the management fees we earn on such investment vehicle to instead be used to either (x) pay down the principal on the securities issued by such vehicle in an amount necessary to cause such tests to pass or (y) purchase sufficient collateral in an amount necessary to cause such CLO to pass such tests. If either of these scenarios occurred, there is the potential that the remaining funds would be insufficient to pay expected management fees on any such CLO, which would result in either a temporary deferral or permanent loss of such management fees. For example, in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, ratings agencies downgraded certain underlying collateral obligations in our CLOs. As a result, we did not recognize approximately $7.0 million of subordinated management fees from our CLOs in the first and second quarters of 2020, but recognized such amounts in the third quarter of 2020 due to improvement in the underlying CLO portfolios.
Underwriting, syndicating and securities placement activities expose us to risks.
TCG Capital Markets may act as an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent for security offerings and TCG Senior Funding L.L.C. may act as an underwriter, originator, syndicator or placement agent in loan originations. If we are unable to
90


sell securities or place loans at the anticipated price levels where we act as an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent, we may incur losses and suffer reputational harm.
As an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent, we also may be subject to potential liability for material misstatements or omissions in prospectuses and other offering documents relating to offerings we underwrite, syndicate or place. In certain situations, we may have liabilities arising from transactions in which our investment fund may participate as a purchase or a seller of securities, which could constitute a conflict of interest or subject us to damages or reputational harm.
Investments in the insurance industry (including our investment in Fortitude) could be adversely impacted by insurance regulations and potential regulatory reforms.
    Carlyle FRL, L.P., an affiliated investment fund (“Carlyle FRL”), holds an indirect 71.5% controlling interest in Fortitude Re, inclusive of our 13.5% interest. The insurance industry is highly regulated and the regulators in many jurisdictions have broad, and in some cases discretionary, authority over insurance companies, including, among other things, with respect to marketing practices, policy rate increases, reserve requirements, capital adequacy, permissible investments and affiliate transactions. In addition, the insurance sector is subject to frequent regulatory change. While we intend to invest in companies and acquire businesses that seek to comply with applicable laws and regulations, the laws and regulations relating to the insurance industry are complex, may be ambiguous or may lack clear judicial or regulatory interpretive guidance. Even where laws or regulations purport to be the same across different jurisdictions, they may be inconsistently applied by the regulators of the different jurisdictions.
    In terms of regulatory changes, the following changes in particular may affect the operations and prospects of our investments in the insurance industry, including Fortitude: (i) changes to interest rates and policies of central banks and regulatory authorities; (ii) changes in applicable direct or indirect taxes, levies or charges; (iii) changes in government or regulatory policy that may significantly influence investor decisions in particular markets in which our investments operate; (iv) changes relating to the capital adequacy framework and rules designed to promote financial stability, both on an individual (re)insurance company level and on a group level; (v) changes to policyholder protections; and (vi) developments in financial reporting. An adverse review or determination by any applicable judicial or regulatory authority of any such law or regulation, or an adverse change in applicable regulatory requirements, judicial or regulatory interpretation, or reimbursement programs, could have a material adverse effect on the operations and/or financial performance of our investments in the insurance industry (including Fortitude) and may increase their compliance and legal costs. Any such costs could negatively impact the value of our investments and the returns we are able to generate on such investments. See “Risks Related to our Company—Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively impact our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise capital, any of which could materially reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.”
Our relationship with Fortitude may not generate a meaningful contribution to our revenue and our indirect controlling ownership of Fortitude could give rise to real or apparent conflicts of interest.
While we expect to derive a meaningful contribution to our revenue across our business segments from our investment in and strategic asset management relationship with Fortitude, as described in Note 4 to Part II, Item 8 “—Investments—Strategic Investment in Fortitude,” we may not be successful in doing so. Pursuant to investment management agreements into which we have entered with Fortitude Re and certain companies with which it has reinsurance agreements (the “Ceding Companies”), certain of our subsidiaries receive performance fees and/or management fees from carry funds and separately managed accounts into which Fortitude Re and the Ceding Companies invest. Through its subsidiaries we managed or advised $9.2 billion of capital attributable to investments made under these investment management agreements, as of December 31, 2022. In addition, in April 2022, we entered into a strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude through a newly-formed investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C. (“CISM”). Under the agreement, CISM provides Fortitude with certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability. Such management fee may decline if there is a corresponding decline in the fair value of the assets we manage and/or the performance of the portfolio.
Our investment management agreements with Fortitude Re and the Ceding Companies are terminable under certain circumstances. If such investment management agreements were terminated, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the benefit we receive from Fortitude Re will not decline due to a disruption or decline in Fortitude’s business or a change in our relationship with Fortitude, including
91


our investment income from our indirect interest in Fortitude and/or investment management agreements with Fortitude Re and the Ceding Companies. We may be unable to replace a decline in the revenue derived from investments made in our funds and entities by Fortitude Re and/or the Ceding Companies on a timely basis if our relationship with Fortitude were to change or if Fortitude were to experience a material adverse impact to its business.
Carlyle FRL owns a controlling interest in Fortitude and has the right to appoint a majority of its board of directors. As a result, there may be real or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to matters affecting the Company, Carlyle-managed funds and their portfolio companies and Fortitude, including with respect to the fiduciary duties that our employees that are board members owe to Fortitude in addition to the duties that they have to the Company. In addition, conflicts of interest could arise with respect to transactions involving business dealings between the Company, Fortitude and each of their respective affiliates. The foregoing conflicts of interest may also arise with respect to subsidiaries of Fortitude, such as Fortitude Re, where Carlyle FRL owns an indirect controlling interest and has the right to appoint a majority of its board of directors.
Our Global Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks.

Our Global Investment Solutions business is subject to additional risks, including the following:
The Global Investment Solutions business is subject to business and other risks and uncertainties generally consistent with our business as a whole, including without limitation legal, tax and regulatory risks, the avoidance or management of conflicts of interest and the ability to attract and retain investment professionals and other personnel, and risks associated with the acquisition of new investment platforms.

Pursuant to our current arrangements with the various businesses, we currently restrict our participation in the investment activities undertaken by our Global Investment Solutions segment (including with respect to AlpInvest and Metropolitan)AlpInvest), which may in turn limit our ability to address risks arising from their investment activities. For example, although we maintain ultimate control over AlpInvest, AlpInvest’sits management team (who are our employees) continuescontinue to exercise independent investment authority without involvement by other Carlyle personnel. For so long as these arrangements are in place, Carlyle representatives will serve on the management board of AlpInvest, but we will observe substantial restrictions on our ability to access investment information or engage in day-to-day participation in the AlpInvest investment business,businesses, including a restriction that AlpInvest investment decisions are made and maintained without involvement by other Carlyle personnel and that no specific investment data, other than data on the investment performance of its investment funds and managed accounts, will be shared. Generally, we have a reduced ability to identify or

68






respond to investment and other operational issues that may arise within the Global Investment Solutions business, relative to other Carlyle investment funds.

Similar to other parts of our business, Global Investment Solutions is seeking to broaden its investor base by raising funds and advising separate accounts for investors on an account-by-account basis and the number and complexity of such investor mandates and fund structures has increased as a result of continuing fundraising efforts, and the activation of mandates with existing investors.

Conflicts may arise between such Global Investment Solutions funds or separate managed accounts (e.g., competition for investment opportunities), and in some cases conflicts may arise between a Global Investment Solutions fund or managed account and a Carlyle fund. In addition, suchcertain managed accounts may have different or heightened standards of care, and if they invest in other investment funds sponsored by us could result in lower management fees and carried interest to us than Carlyle’s typical investment funds.

Our Global Investment Solutions business is separated from the rest of the firm by an informational wall designed to prevent certain types of information from flowing from the Global Investment Solutions platform to the rest of the firm. This information barrier could limitlimits the collaboration between our investment professionals with respect to specific investments.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Our common unitholders do not elect our general partner or, except in limited circumstances, vote on our general partner’s directors and have limited ability to influence decisions regarding our business.
Our general partner, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., which is owned by our senior Carlyle professionals, manages all of our operations and activities. The limited liability company agreement of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. establishes a Board of Directors that is responsible for the oversight of our business and operations. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, our common unitholders have only limited voting rights and have no right to remove our general partner or, except in the limited circumstances described below, elect the directors of our general partner. Our common unitholders have no right to elect the directors of our general partner unless, as determined on January 31 of each year, the total voting power held by holders of the special voting units in The Carlyle Group L.P. (including voting units held by our general partner and its affiliates) in their capacity as such, or otherwise held by then-current or former Carlyle personnel (treating voting units deliverable to such persons pursuant to outstanding equity awards as being held by them), collectively, constitutes less than 10% of the voting power of the outstanding voting units of The Carlyle Group L.P. As of December 31, 2017, the percentage of the voting power of The Carlyle Group L.P. limited partners collectively held by those categories of holders and calculated in this manner was approximately 74%. Unless and until the foregoing voting power condition is satisfied, our general partner’s Board of Directors will be elected in accordance with its limited liability company agreement, which provides that directors may be appointed and removed by members of our general partner holding a majority in interest of the voting power of the members, which voting power is allocated to each member ratably according to his or her aggregate relative ownership of our common units and partnership units. As a result, our common unitholders have limited ability to influence decisions regarding our business.
In addition, holders of the preferred units generally have no voting rights and have none of the voting rights given to holders of our common units, subject to certain exceptions. See “Risks Related to Our Preferred Units—Holders of the preferred units have limited voting rights.” 
Our senior Carlyle professionals will be able to determine the outcome of those few matters that may be submitted for a vote of the limited partners.
TCG Carlyle Global Partners L.L.C., an entity wholly owned by our senior Carlyle professionals, holds a special voting unit that provides it with a number of votes on any matter that may be submitted for a vote of our common unitholders (voting together as a single class on all such matters) that is equal to the aggregate number of vested and unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings. As of December 31, 2017, a special voting unit held by TCG Carlyle Global Partners L.L.C. provided it with approximately 70% of the total voting power of The Carlyle Group L.P. limited partners. Accordingly, our senior Carlyle professionals generally will have sufficient voting power to determine the outcome of those few matters that may be submitted for a vote of the limited partners of The Carlyle Group L.P.
Our common unitholders’ voting rights are further restricted by the provision in our partnership agreement stating that any common units held by a person that beneficially owns 20% or more of any class of The Carlyle Group L.P. common units

69






then outstanding (other than our general partner and its affiliates, or a direct or subsequently approved transferee of our general partner or its affiliates) cannot be voted on any matter. In addition, our partnership agreement contains provisions limiting the ability of our common unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the ability of our common unitholders to influence the manner or direction of our management. Our partnership agreement also does not restrict our general partner’s ability to take actions that may result in our being treated as an entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal (and applicable state) income tax purposes. Furthermore, the common unitholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under our partnership agreement or applicable Delaware law in the event of a merger or consolidation, a sale of substantially all of our assets or any other transaction or event.
As a result of these matters and the provisions referred to under “— Our common unitholders do not elect our general partner or, except in limited circumstances, vote on our general partner’s directors and have limited ability to influence decisions regarding our business,” our common unitholders may be deprived of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common units in the future through a sale of The Carlyle Group L.P., and the trading prices of our common units may be adversely affected by the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.
In addition, holders of the preferred units generally have no voting rights and have none of the voting rights given to holders of our common units, subject to certain exceptions.  See “Risks Related to Our Preferred Units— Holders of the preferred units have limited voting rights.”

We are permitted to repurchase all of the outstanding common units under certain circumstances, and this repurchase may occur at an undesirable time or price.
We have the right to acquire all of our then-outstanding common units at the then-current trading price either if 10% or less of our common units is held by persons other than our general partner and its affiliates or if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. As a result of our general partner’s right to purchase outstanding common units, a holder of common units may have his common units purchased at an undesirable time or price.
We are a limited partnership and as a result qualify for and intend to continue to rely on exceptions from certain corporate governance and other requirements under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
We are a limited partnership and qualify for exceptions from certain corporate governance and other requirements of the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Pursuant to these exceptions, limited partnerships may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, including the requirements (1) that a majority of the Board of Directors of our general partner consist of independent directors, (2) that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors, (3) that the compensation committee be required to consider certain independence factors when engaging compensation consultants, legal counsel and other committee advisors, (4) that we have independent director oversight of director nominations, and (5) that we obtain unitholder approval for (a) certain private placements of units that equal or exceed 20% of the outstanding common units or voting power, (b) certain acquisitions of stock or assets of another company or (c) a change of control transaction. In addition, we are not required to hold annual meetings of our common unitholders. We intend to continue to avail ourselves of these exceptions. Accordingly, common unitholders generally do not have the same protections afforded to equityholders of entities that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Potential conflicts of interest may arise among our general partner, its affiliates and us. Our general partner and its affiliates have limited fiduciary duties to us and our common and preferred unitholders, which may permit them to favor their own interests to the detriment of us and our common and preferred unitholders.
Conflicts of interest may arise among our general partner and its affiliates, on the one hand, and us and our common unitholders, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the interests of our common and preferred unitholders. These conflicts include, among others, the following:
our general partner determines the amount and timing of our investments and dispositions, indebtedness, issuances of additional partnership interests and amounts of reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution to common and preferred unitholders;

our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us and the common and preferred unitholders in resolving conflicts of interest, which has the effect of limiting its duties (including fiduciary duties) to our common and preferred unitholders. For example, our subsidiaries that serve as the general partners of our investment funds have certain duties and obligations to those funds and their investors

70






as a result of which we expect to regularly take actions in a manner consistent with such duties and obligations but that might adversely affect our near term results of operations or cash flow;

because our senior Carlyle professionals hold their Carlyle Holdings partnership units directly or through entities that are not subject to corporate income taxation and The Carlyle Group L.P. holds Carlyle Holdings partnership units through wholly owned subsidiaries, some of which are subject to corporate income taxation, conflicts may arise between our senior Carlyle professionals and The Carlyle Group L.P. relating to the selection, structuring and disposition of investments and other matters. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction by a limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships generally will accelerate payments under the tax receivable agreement and increase the present value of such payments, and the disposition of assets before an exchange or acquisition transaction will increase the tax liability of a limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships without giving rise to any rights of a limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships to receive payments under the tax receivable agreement;

our partnership agreement does not prohibit affiliates of the general partner, including its owners, from engaging in other businesses or activities, including those that might directly compete with us;

our general partner has limited its liability and reduced or eliminated its duties (including fiduciary duties) under the partnership agreement, while also restricting the remedies available to our common and preferred unitholders for actions that, without these limitations, might constitute breaches of duty (including fiduciary duty). In addition, we have agreed to indemnify our general partner and its affiliates to the fullest extent permitted by law, except with respect to conduct involving bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct. By purchasing our common and preferred units, common and preferred unitholders have agreed and consented to the provisions set forth in our partnership agreement, including the provisions regarding conflicts of interest situations that, in the absence of such provisions, might constitute a breach of fiduciary or other duties under applicable state law;

our partnership agreement will not restrict our general partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered, or from entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf, so long as our general partner agrees to the terms of any such additional contractual arrangements in good faith as determined under the partnership agreement;

our general partner determines how much we pay for acquisition targets and the structure of such consideration, including whether to incur debt to fund the transaction, whether to issue units as consideration and the number of units to be issued and the amount and timing of any earn-out payments;

our general partner determines whether to waive certain restrictions relating to such units pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement;

our general partner determines how much debt we incur and whether to issue preferred securities and those decisions may adversely affect our credit ratings;

our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and its affiliates are reimbursable by us;

our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed to us by it and its affiliates; and

our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel, accountants or others to perform services for us.
See “Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence” and “Part III. Items 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board of Directors—Conflicts Committee.”

71






Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce or eliminate duties (including fiduciary duties) of our general partner and limit remedies available to common and preferred unitholders for actions that might otherwise constitute a breach of duty. It will be difficult for a preferred or common unitholder to successfully challenge a resolution of a conflict of interest by our general partner or by its conflicts committee.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that waive or consent to conduct by our general partner and its affiliates that might otherwise raise issues about compliance with fiduciary duties or applicable law. For example, our partnership agreement provides that when our general partner is acting in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner, it may act without any fiduciary obligations to us or our common and preferred unitholders whatsoever. When our general partner, in its capacity as our general partner, is permitted to or required to make a decision in its “sole discretion” or “discretion” or pursuant to any provision of our partnership agreement not subject to an express standard of “good faith,” then our general partner is entitled to consider only such interests and factors as it desires, including its own interests, and has no duty or obligation (fiduciary or otherwise) to give any consideration to any interest of or factors affecting us or any limited partners and will not be subject to any different standards imposed by the partnership agreement, otherwise existing at law, in equity or otherwise.
The modifications of fiduciary duties contained in our partnership agreement are expressly permitted by Delaware law. Hence, we and our common and preferred unitholders only have recourse and are able to seek remedies against our general partner if our general partner breaches its obligations pursuant to our partnership agreement. Unless our general partner breaches its obligations pursuant to our partnership agreement, we and our common and preferred unitholders do not have any recourse against our general partner even if our general partner were to act in a manner that was inconsistent with traditional fiduciary duties. Furthermore, even if there has been a breach of the obligations set forth in our partnership agreement, our partnership agreement provides that our general partner and its officers and directors are not be liable to us or our common and preferred unitholders for errors of judgment or for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that the general partner or its officers and directors acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct. These modifications are detrimental to the common and preferred unitholders because they restrict the remedies available to common and preferred unitholders for actions that without those limitations might constitute breaches of duty (including fiduciary duty).
Whenever a potential conflict of interest exists between us, any of our subsidiaries or any of our partners, and our general partner or its affiliates, our general partner may resolve such conflict of interest. Our general partner’s resolution of the conflict of interest will conclusively be deemed approved by the partnership and all of our partners, and not to constitute a breach of the partnership agreement or any duty, unless the general partner subjectively believes such determination or action is opposed to the best interests of the partnership. A preferred or common unitholder seeking to challenge this resolution of the conflict of interest would bear the burden of proving that the general partner subjectively believed that such resolution was opposed to the best interests of the partnership. This is different from the situation with Delaware corporations, where a conflict resolution by an interested party would be presumed to be unfair and the interested party would have the burden of demonstrating that the resolution was fair.
Also, if our general partner obtains the approval of the conflicts committee of our general partner, any determination or action by the general partner will be conclusively deemed to be made or taken in good faith and not a breach by our general partner of the partnership agreement or any duties it may owe to us or our common and preferred unitholders. This is different from the situation with Delaware corporations, where a conflict resolution by a committee consisting solely of independent directors may, in certain circumstances, merely shift the burden of demonstrating unfairness to the plaintiff. Common and preferred unitholders, in purchasing our common and preferred units, are deemed as having consented to the provisions set forth in our partnership agreement, including the provisions regarding conflicts of interest situations that, in the absence of such provisions, might constitute a breach of fiduciary or other duties under applicable state law. As a result, common and preferred unitholders will, as a practical matter, not be able to successfully challenge an informed decision by the conflicts committee. See “Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence” and “Part III. Items 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board of Directors—Conflicts Committee.”
The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without common unitholder consent.
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or consolidation without the consent of our common unitholders. Furthermore, at any time, the members of our general partner may sell or transfer all or part of their limited liability company interests in our general partner without the approval of the common unitholders, subject to certain restrictions as described elsewhere in this annual report. A new general partner may not be willing or able to form new investment funds and could form funds that have investment objectives and governing terms that differ materially from those of our current investment funds. A new owner could also have a different investment philosophy, employ investment professionals who are less experienced, be unsuccessful in identifying investment opportunities or have a track record that is

72






not as successful as Carlyle’s track record. If any of the foregoing were to occur, we could experience difficulty in making new investments, and the value of our existing investments, our business, our results of operations and our financial condition could materially suffer.
We intend to pay periodic distributions to our common and preferred unitholders, but our ability to do so may be limited by our cash flow from operations and available liquidity, holding partnership structure, applicable provisions of Delaware law and contractual restrictions and obligations.
The Carlyle Group L.P. is a holding partnership and has no material assets other than the ownership of the partnership units in Carlyle Holdings held through wholly owned subsidiaries. The Carlyle Group L.P. has no independent means of generating revenue. Accordingly, we intend to cause Carlyle Holdings to make distributions to its partners, including The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries, to fund any distributions The Carlyle Group L.P. may declare on the common units. If Carlyle Holdings makes such distributions, the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings will be entitled to receive equivalent distributions pro rata based on their partnership interests in Carlyle Holdings. Because Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. must pay taxes and make payments under the tax receivable agreement, the amounts ultimately distributed by The Carlyle Group L.P. to common unitholders are generally expected to be less, on a per unit basis, than the amounts distributed by the Carlyle Holdings partnerships to the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships in respect of their Carlyle Holdings partnership units. In addition, each Carlyle Holdings partnership has issued a series of preferred units (the “GP Mirror Units”) with economic terms designed to mirror those of the Series A Preferred Units. The GP Mirror Units pay the same 5.875% rate per annum to our wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc., that we pay on our Series A Preferred Units. Although income allocated in respect of distributions on the GP Mirror Units made to Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. is subject to tax, cash distributions to the holders of Series A Preferred Units will not be reduced on account of any income owed by Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc.
The declaration and payment of any distributions is at the sole discretion of our general partner, which may change our distribution policy at any time. There can be no assurance that any distributions, whether quarterly or otherwise, will or can be paid. Our ability to make cash distributions to our common unitholders depends on a number of factors, including among other things, general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans and prospects, our business and investment opportunities, our financial condition and operating results, working capital requirements and anticipated cash needs, contractual restrictions and obligations, including fulfilling our current and future capital commitments, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, restrictions and other implications on the payment of distributions by us to our common unitholders or by our subsidiaries to us, payments required pursuant to the tax receivable agreement and such other factors as our general partner may deem relevant.

Our preferred units rank senior to our common units with respect to the payment of distributions. Subject to certain exceptions, unless distributions have been declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment on the preferred units for a quarterly distribution period, during the remainder of that distribution period we may not declare or pay or set apart payment for distributions on any units of the Partnership that are junior to the preferred units, including our common units, and we may not repurchase any such junior units. Distributions on the Series A Preferred Units will reduce after-tax Distributable Earnings.

Distributions on the preferred units are discretionary and non-cumulative. See “Risks Related to Our Preferred Units—Distributions on the preferred units are discretionary and non-cumulative.”
Under the Delaware Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to a partner if after the distribution all our liabilities, other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specific property of the partnership, would exceed the fair value of our assets. If we were to make such an impermissible distribution, any limited partner who received a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution was in violation of the Delaware Limited Partnership Act would be liable to us for the amount of the distribution for three years. In addition, the terms of our credit facility or other financing arrangements may from time to time include covenants or other restrictions that could constrain our ability to make distributions.

73






We are required to pay the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships for most of the benefits relating to any additional tax depreciation or amortization deductions that we may claim as a result of the tax basis step-up we receive in connection with subsequent sales or exchanges of Carlyle Holdings partnership units and related transactions. In certain cases, payments under the tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual tax benefits we realize and our ability to make payments under the tax receivable agreement may be limited by our structure.
Limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, may, subject to the terms of the exchange agreement and the Carlyle Holdings partnership agreements, exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for The Carlyle Group L.P. common units on a one-for-one basis. A Carlyle Holdings limited partner must exchange one partnership unit in each of the three Carlyle Holdings partnerships to effect an exchange for a common unit. The exchanges are expected to result in increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Carlyle Holdings. These increases in tax basis may increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions. Such tax deductions are expected to reduce the amount of tax that Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. and any other entity which may in the future pay taxes and become obligated to make payments under the tax receivable agreement as described in the fourth succeeding paragraph below, which we refer to as the “corporate taxpayers,” would otherwise be required to pay in the future, although the IRS may challenge all or part of that tax basis increase, and a court could sustain such a challenge.
We have entered into a tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships that provides for payment by the corporate taxpayers to such owners of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or foreign or franchise tax that the corporate taxpayers realize as a result of these increases in tax basis and of certain other tax benefits related to our entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement. This payment obligation is an obligation of the corporate taxpayers and not of Carlyle Holdings. While the actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under this agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, we expect that as a result of the size of the increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Carlyle Holdings, the payments that we may make pursuant to the tax receivable agreement will be substantial. The factors include:
the timing of exchanges — for instance, the increase in any tax deductions will vary depending on the fair value, which may fluctuate over time, of the depreciable or amortizable assets of Carlyle Holdings at the time of each exchange;

the price of our common units at the time of the exchange — the increase in any tax deductions, as well as the tax basis increase in other assets, of Carlyle Holdings, is directly proportional to the price of our common units at the time of the exchange;

the extent to which such exchanges are taxable — if an exchange is not taxable for any reason, increased deductions will not be available;

the amount and timing of our income — the corporate taxpayers will be required to pay 85% of the cash tax savings as and when realized, if any. If the corporate taxpayers do not have taxable income (without the tax receivable agreement related tax deductions), the corporate taxpayers are not required (absent a change of control or other circumstances requiring an early termination payment) to make payments under the tax receivable agreement for that taxable year because no cash tax savings will have been realized. However, any cash tax savings that do not result in realized benefits in a given tax year will likely generate tax attributes that may be utilized to generate benefits in previous or future tax years. The utilization of such tax attributes will result in payments under the tax receivables agreement; and

tax rate and tax legislation - the impact of changes in tax rates or tax legislation may impact the tax paid, which would modify the amount paid under the agreement. For example the TCJA includes permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, which will likely reduce future amounts to be paid under the agreement with respect to tax years beginning in 2018. In addition, there are numerous other provisions which may also have an impact on the amount of tax to be paid.
The payments under the tax receivable agreement are not conditioned upon the tax receivable agreement counterparties’ continued ownership of us. In the event that The Carlyle Group L.P. or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries that are not treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes become taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, these entities will also be obligated to make payments under the tax receivable agreement on the same basis and to the same extent as the corporate taxpayers, and could impact future amounts to be paid pursuant to the tax receivable agreement.

74






The tax receivable agreement provides that upon certain changes of control, or if, at any time, the corporate taxpayers elect an early termination of the tax receivable agreement, the corporate taxpayers’ obligations under the tax receivable agreement (with respect to all Carlyle Holdings partnership units whether or not previously exchanged) would be calculated by reference to the value of all future payments that the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships would have been entitled to receive under the tax receivable agreement using certain valuation assumptions, including that the corporate taxpayers’ will have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement and, in the case of an early termination election, that any Carlyle Holdings partnership units that have not been exchanged are deemed exchanged for the market value of the common units at the time of termination. Assuming that the market value of a common unit was equal to $22.90 per common unit, which was the closing price per common unit on December 29, 2017, and that LIBOR were to be 2.95%, we estimate that the aggregate amount of these termination payments would be approximately $618 million if the corporate taxpayers were to exercise their termination right.
The foregoing number is merely an estimate and the actual payments could differ materially. In addition, the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships will not reimburse us for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement if such tax basis increase is successfully challenged by the IRS. The corporate taxpayers’ ability to achieve benefits from any tax basis increase, and the payments to be made under this agreement, will depend upon a number of factors, including the timing and amount of our future income. As a result, even in the absence of a change of control or an election to terminate the tax receivable agreement, payments to the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships under the tax receivable agreement could be in excess of the corporate taxpayers’ actual cash tax savings.
Accordingly, it is possible that the actual cash tax savings realized by the corporate taxpayers may be significantly less than the corresponding tax receivable agreement payments. There may be a material negative effect on our liquidity if the payments under the tax receivable agreement exceed the actual cash tax savings that the corporate taxpayers realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement and/or distributions to the corporate taxpayers by Carlyle Holdings are not sufficient to permit the corporate taxpayers to make payments under the tax receivable agreement after they have paid taxes and other expenses. We may need to incur debt to finance payments under the tax receivable agreement to the extent our cash resources are insufficient to meet our obligations under the tax receivable agreement as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise.
See “Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence—Tax Receivable Agreement.”

If The Carlyle Group L.P. were deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
An entity generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if:
it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or

absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.
We believe that we are engaged primarily in the business of providing asset management services and not in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We hold ourselves out as an asset management firm and do not propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that The Carlyle Group L.P. is an “orthodox” investment company as defined in section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act and described in the first bullet point above. Furthermore, The Carlyle Group L.P. does not have any material assets other than its interests in certain wholly owned subsidiaries, which in turn have no material assets other than general partner interests in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. These wholly owned subsidiaries are the sole general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships and are vested with all management and control over the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. We do not believe that the equity interests of The Carlyle Group L.P. in its wholly owned subsidiaries or the general partner interests of these wholly owned subsidiaries in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships are investment securities. Moreover, because we believe that the capital interests of the general partners of our funds in their respective funds are neither securities nor investment securities, we believe that less than 40% of The Carlyle Group L.P.’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis are composed of assets that could be considered investment securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that The Carlyle Group L.P. is an inadvertent investment company by virtue of the 40% test in section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment

75






Company Act as described in the second bullet point above. In addition, we believe that The Carlyle Group L.P. is not an investment company under section 3(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act because it is primarily engaged in a non-investment company business.
The Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed parameters for the organization and operation of investment companies. Among other things, the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations on the issuance of debt and equity securities, generally prohibit the issuance of options and impose certain governance requirements. We intend to conduct our operations so that The Carlyle Group L.P. will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If anything were to happen which would cause The Carlyle Group L.P. to be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, requirements imposed by the Investment Company Act, including limitations on our capital structure, ability to transact business with affiliates (including us) and ability to compensate key employees, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently conducted, impair the agreements and arrangements between and among The Carlyle Group L.P., Carlyle Holdings and our senior Carlyle professionals, or any combination thereof, and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be required to limit the amount of investments that we make as a principal or otherwise conduct our business in a manner that does not subject us to the registration and other requirements of the Investment Company Act.
Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our financial statements.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP as defined in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) of the FASB. From time to time, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards or guidance that are incorporated into the ASC. It is possible that future accounting standards we are required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
For instance, in the last three years, the FASB has issued several accounting standard updates that will change (or have already changed) how we account for and report significant areas of our business. On January 1, 2016, we changed the way we evaluate certain legal entities for consolidation. This accounting standard update reduced the number of funds we consolidate and reduced our total assets, total liabilities and total partners' capital. Further, in May 2014, the FASB issued a final accounting standard that changes the way entities recognize revenue in their financial statements. This new accounting method will affect how we recognize and present revenues in our financial statements. The accounting change related to the recognition of revenue is effective January 1, 2018. Additionally, in February 2016, the FASB issued a final accounting standard that will require us to recognize virtually all of our leases on our consolidated balance sheet. While this accounting change is not effective until January 1, 2019, it is required to be applied retrospectively and we expect that our total assets and total liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet to increase upon adoption of this accounting guidance.

The changes to GAAP will also impose special demands on entities in the areas of governance, employee training, internal controls and disclosure.
The consolidation of investment funds, holding companies or operating businesses of our portfolio companies could make it more difficult to understand the operating performance of the Partnership and could create operational risks for the Partnership.
Under applicable US GAAP standards, we may be required to consolidate certain of our investment funds, holding companies or operating businesses if we determine that these entities are VIEs and that the Partnership is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The consolidation of such entities could make it difficult for an investor to differentiate the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Partnership apart from the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the consolidated VIEs. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are not available to meet our liquidity requirements and similarly we generally have not guaranteed or assumed any obligation for repayment of the liabilities of the consolidated VIEs.
As of December 31, 2017 (and subsequent to the January 1, 2016, adoption of an accounting standard that changed the way we evaluate certain legal entities for consolidation as discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K), the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs reflected in our consolidated balance sheets were not material.
As a public entity, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, as amended, and requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and

76






current reports with respect to our business and financial condition, and provide an annual assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting as required by the Exchange Act, significant resources and management oversight are required. We have implemented procedures and processes for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to public companies. The VIEs that we consolidate as the primary beneficiary are, subject to certain transition guidelines, included in our annual assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, we will need to continue to implement and oversee procedures and processes to integrate such operations into our internal control structure. If we are not able to implement or maintain the necessary procedures and processes, we may be unable to report our financial information on a timely or accurate basis and could be subject adverse consequences, including sanctions by the SEC or violations of applicable Nasdaq listing rules, and could result in a breach of the covenants under the agreements governing our financing arrangements. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements.

Risks Related to Our Common UnitsStock
The market price of our common unitsstock may decline due to the large number of shares of common unitsstock eligible for exchange and future sale.
The market price of our common unitsstock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of common unitsstock in the market in the future or the perception that such sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may
92


occur, also mightmay make it more difficult for us to sell common unitsstock in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. Subject, in some cases, to compliance with our insider trading policy, minimum retained ownership requirements and limitations applicable to affiliates under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, all of these shares are freely tradable. In addition, the holders of these shares have the benefit of registration rights agreements with us. Moreover, as holders of freely tradable common stock rather than Carlyle Holdings units, the Former Private Unitholders are now able to more easily sell shares of common stock into the market (or donate shares of common stock to charities which in turn may sell these into the market) than was the case before the Conversion. For example, the Former Private Unitholders are no longer subject to restrictions that in most cases limited their ability to exchange Holdings Units for common units to prescribed quarterly exchange dates. This could result in the Former Private Unitholders disposing of their equity interests in us more quickly and/or at a higher volumes than in the past, and the market price of our common stock could decline as a result. Subject to the restrictions described below, we may issue and sell in the future additional shares of common units. Since our initial public offering, we have issued 4,500,000 common units in primary offerings and have granted 50,462,113 deferred restricted common units as of December 31, 2017.stock. The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities would also result in dilution of our existing unitholders’stockholders’ equity interest. The issuance of the additional shares of common units,stock, the sale of shares of common units upon the exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership unitsstock by our significant stockholders and the vesting and sale of restricted stock units or the deferred restricted common unitsperception that such sales may occur could cause the market price of our common unitsstock to decline.
As of December 31, 2017, limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships owned an aggregate of 234,813,858 Carlyle Holdings partnership units. Pursuant to the exchange agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, the limited partners may, subject to any applicable remaining vesting and minimum retained ownership requirements other transfer restrictions applicable to such limited partners as set forth in the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, on a quarterly basis (subject to the terms of the exchange agreement), exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for our common units on a one-for-one basis, which exchanges began in the second quarter of 2017. Of the total units in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, entities affiliated with Mubadala Development Company, an Abu Dhabi-based strategic development and investment company (“Mubadala”) owned 23,517,939 Carlyle Holdings partnership units as of December 31, 2017. Mubadala is generally entitled to exchange Carlyle Holdings partnerships units for common units at any time (subject to the terms of the exchange agreement). Common units received upon an exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership units are eligible for immediate sale.
We have entered into registration rights agreements with the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings that generally require us to register these common units under the Securities Act. See “Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence—Registration Rights Agreements.” Provisions of the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships and related agreements that contractually restrict the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships’ ability to transfer the Carlyle Holdings partnership units or The Carlyle Group L.P. common units they hold may lapse over time or be waived, modified or amended at any time.
Under our Equity Incentive Plan, we have granted 50,462,113 deferredhad 10,865,248 unvested restricted commonstock units outstanding as of December 31, 2017. Additional common units2022. In June 2021, our stockholders approved an amended and Carlyle Holdings partnership units will be available for future grant under ourrestated Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to which plan provideswe may issue up to 16,000,000 awards. As of December 31, 2022, the total number of shares of common stock available for automatic annual increasesgrant under the amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan was 12,861,371 and, following the grant of awards in February 2023, the total number of shares of common stock available for grant under the amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan was 2,957,542. An increase in the number of unitsshares available for future issuance.grant under the Equity Incentive Plan would require shareholder approval, and any such approval would result in more shares that may be delivered in settlement of vested restricted stock unit awards and that may ultimately be sold in the market, which could lead to a decline in the market price of our common stock. We have filed several registration statements and intend to file additional registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of common unitsstock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common unitsstock issued or available for future grant under our amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan (including pursuant to automatic annual increases).when applicable. Any such Form S-8 registration statement will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, common unitsstock registered under such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market. As restricted stock unit awards vest and shares of common stock are delivered to restricted stock unit holders, the market price of our common stock may decline if such holders elect to sell their shares of common stock. Morgan Stanley, our equity plan service provider, may, from time to time, act as a broker, dealer, or agent for, or otherwise facilitate sales in the open market through block transactions or otherwise

77






of our common unitsstock on behalf of, plan participants, including in connection with sales of shares of common unitsstock to fund tax obligations payable in connection with the vesting of awards under our amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan.
In addition, our partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited number of additional partnership securities and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to partnership securities for the consideration and on the terms and conditions established by our general partner in its sole discretion without the approval of any limited partners. In accordance with the Delaware Limited Partnership Act and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional partnership interests that have certain designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to common units. Similarly, the Carlyle Holdings partnership agreements authorize the wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P. which are the general partners of those partnerships to issue an unlimited number of additional partnership securities of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships with certain designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to the Carlyle Holdings partnerships units, and which may be exchangeable for our common units.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they downgrade their recommendations regarding our common units, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common units is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who cover us downgrades our common units or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our common unit stock price may decline. If analysts cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our common unit stock price or trading volume to decline and our common units to be less liquid.

The market price of our common unitsstock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

Our common unitsstock may trade less frequently than those of certain more mature companies due to the limited number of shares of common unitsstock held by non-affiliates outstanding. Due to such limited trading volume, the price of our common unitsstock may display abrupt or erratic movements at times. Additionally, itIt also may be more difficult for investors to buy and sell significant amounts of our common unitsstock without an unfavorable impact on prevailing market prices.

Even if a trading market develops, theThe market price of our common unitsstock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common unitsstock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our operating results could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors due to a number of potential factors, including variations in our quarterly operating results or distributionsdividends to unitholders,common stockholders, additions or departures of key management personnel, failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, publication of research reports about our industry, litigation and government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting our business, adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or speculation in the press or investment community, announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments, adverse publicity about the industries in which we participate or individual scandals, the COVID-19 pandemic, general market conditions and other events or occurrences, and in response the market price of our common unitsstock could decrease significantly. You may be unable to resell your common unitsstock at or above the price you paid for them.

93


In the past few years, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. In the past, followingFollowing periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against public companies. This type of litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.    

Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.
Risks RelatedCarlyle Group Management L.L.C., which is wholly owned and controlled by our founders and other senior Carlyle professionals, holds approximately 42% of the voting power of our common stock as of December 31, 2022 pursuant to an irrevocable proxy granted to it by senior Carlyle professionals and certain other former limited partners of Carlyle Holdings who became holders of shares of common stock in connection with the Conversion.
    For so long as Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. continues to have voting power over a significant percentage of our common stock, even though such amount is less than 50%, it will still be able to significantly influence the composition of our Board of Directors and the approval of actions requiring stockholder approval. Accordingly, for such period of time, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. will have significant influence with respect to our Preferred Units

management, business plans and policies, including the appointment and removal of our officers. In particular, for so long as Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. continues to own a significant percentage of our common stock, it will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of our company or a change in the composition of our Board of Directors and could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of our company. The concentration of ownership could delay or deter possible changes in control of our company and could deprive you of an opportunity to receive a premium for your shares of common stock as part of a sale of our company and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock. The interests of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. may not coincide with our interests or the preferred unitsinterests of other holders of our common stock.
Our founders have the right to designate members of our Board of Directors.
    Pursuant to the stockholder agreements with each of our founders, for so long as such founder and/or his “Founder Group” (as defined in the stockholder agreements) beneficially owns at least 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock, each of our founders will have the right to nominate one director to our Board of Directors. In addition, each founder will have the right to nominate a second director to our Board of Directors until the earlier of (x) such time as such founder and/or his Founder Group ceases to beneficially own at least 20 million shares of our common stock and (y) January 1, 2027. For so long as at least one founder is entitled to designate two directors to the Board of Directors, the founders then serving on our Board of Directors may (i) designate a founder to serve as chair or co-chair and (ii) designate a founder to serve on each of the compensation and nominating committees and any executive committee, subject to applicable law and listing standards. Accordingly, for such period of time, our founders will have significant influence over the composition of our Board of Directors and could prevent certain changes in the composition of our Board of Directors.
Our certificate of incorporation does not limit the ability of our former general partner, founders, directors, officers or stockholders to compete with us.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that none of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., any person that controls Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., and our founders, directors and officers and stockholders will have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which we operate. In the ordinary course of their business activities, these persons may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders.
These persons also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be adversely affectedcomplementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to the Company. In addition, these persons may have an interest in our pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to our common stockholders.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that stockholders might consider favorable.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the merger or acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. Among other things, these provisions:
94


provide that our Board of Directors will be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in size as possible, with directors in each class serving three-year terms and with terms of the directors of only one class expiring in any given year (although it is anticipated that a management proposal to reorganize the Board of Directors into one class will be voted on by various factors.stockholders at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders);

The market priceprovide for the removal of directors only for cause;
provide that, if at any time any person or group (other than Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. and its affiliates, a direct or subsequently approved transferee of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. or its affiliates) beneficially owns 20% or more of any class of stock then outstanding, that person or group will lose voting rights on all of its shares of stock and such shares may not be voted on any matter;
would allow us to authorize the issuance of shares of one or more series of preferred unitsstock, including in connection with a stockholder rights plan, financing transactions or otherwise, the terms of which series may fluctuate basedbe established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;
prohibit stockholder action by written consent unless such action is consented by the Board of Directors;
provide for certain limitations on convening special stockholder meetings;
provide (i) that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, or repeal our bylaws and (ii) that our stockholders may only amend our bylaws with the approval of at least a numbermajority of factors, including:all of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote; and
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
Moreover, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to provisions of Delaware law, which may impede or discourage a takeover attempt that our stockholders may find beneficial. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law, our stockholder agreements with our founders and proxy held by Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company, including actions that our stockholders may deem advantageous, or could negatively affect the trading price of our common units;

the incurrence of additional indebtedness or additional issuances of other series or classes of preferred units;


78






whether we declare or fail to declare distributions on the preferred units from time to timestock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and our ability to make distributions under the terms of our indebtedness;

our creditworthiness, results of operations and financial condition;

the credit ratings of the preferred units;

the prevailing interest rates or rates of return being paid by other companies similar to us and the market for similar securities; and

economic, financial, geopolitical, regulatory or judicial events that affect us or the financial markets generally.

Our performance, market conditions and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and can be expected to fluctuate in the future. Fluctuations in these factors could have an adverse effect on the price and liquidity of the preferred units. In general, as market interest rates rise, securities with fixed interest rates or fixed distribution rates, such as the preferred units, decline in value. Consequently, if you purchase the preferred units and market interest rates increase, the market price of the preferred units may decline. We cannot predict the future level of market interest rates.

Our ability to pay quarterly distributions on the preferred units will be subject to, among other things, general business conditions, our financial results, restrictions under the terms of our existing and future indebtedness or senior units, and our liquidity needs. Any reduction or discontinuation of quarterly distributions could cause the market price of the preferred units to decline significantly. Accordingly, the preferred units may trade at a discount to their purchase price.
Distributions on the preferred units are discretionary and non-cumulative.
Distributions on the preferred units are discretionary and non-cumulative. Holders of preferred units will only receive distributions when, as, and if declared by the board of directors of our general partner. Consequently, if the board of directors of our general partner does not declare a distribution for a distribution period, holders of the preferred units would not be entitled to receive any distribution for such distribution period, and such unpaid distribution will not be payable in such distribution period or in later distribution periods. We will have no obligation to pay distributions for a distribution period if the board of directors of our general partner does not declare such distribution before the scheduled record date for such period, whether or not distributions are declared or paid for any subsequent distribution period with respect to our Series A Preferred Units or any other preferred units we may issue. This may result in holders of the preferred units not receiving the full amount of distributions that they expect to receive, or any distributions, and may make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to resell preferred units orelect directors of your choosing and to do so at a price that the holder finds attractive.

cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.
The board of directorsprovision of our general partnercertificate of incorporation requiring exclusive venue in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware for certain types of lawsuits may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that any claims, suits, actions or proceedings arising out of or relating in its sole discretion, determineany way to suspend distributions onour certificate of incorporation may only be brought in the preferred units, whichCourt of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, any other court in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction. This provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and stockholders.
If The Carlyle Group Inc. were deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on the market priceour business.
    An entity generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the preferred units. There can be no assurances that our operations will generate sufficient cash flowsInvestment Company Act if:
it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to enable usengage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to pay distributions on the preferred units. Our financial and operating performance is subject to prevailing economic and industry conditions and to financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
The termsacquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the preferred units willvalue of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.
95


We believe that we are engaged primarily in the business of providing asset management services and not restrict our abilityin the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We hold ourselves out as an asset management firm and do not propose to distribute tax distribution amounts toengage primarily in the holdersbusiness of our common units eveninvesting, reinvesting or trading in periods when distributions onsecurities. Accordingly, we do not believe that The Carlyle Group Inc. is an “orthodox” investment company as defined in section 3(a)(1)(A) of the preferred unitsInvestment Company Act and described in the first bullet point above. Furthermore, The Carlyle Group Inc. does not have been suspended.
Although we generally cannot repurchase any common units or junior units and we generally may not declare or pay or set apart payment for distributions on any common units or junior units unless distributionsmaterial assets other than its interests in certain wholly owned subsidiaries, which in turn have been declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment on the preferred units, there are exceptions, including for tax distributions. Accordingly, even if the board of directors of ourno material assets other than general partner determines,interests in its sole discretion, to suspend distributions on the preferred units, we may still make distributions to the holders of our common units of amounts equal to the tax distribution amounts received from Carlyle Holdings whichpartnerships. These wholly owned subsidiaries are the sole general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships distributeand are vested with all management and control over the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. We do not believe that the equity interests of The Carlyle Group Inc. in accordance withits wholly owned subsidiaries or the termsgeneral partner interests of their partnership agreements. The holdersthese wholly owned subsidiaries in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships are investment securities. Moreover, because we believe that the capital interests of the preferred units will have no right to prohibit or participategeneral partners of our funds in their respective funds are neither securities nor investment securities, we believe that less than 40% of The Carlyle Group Inc.’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and will have no claim over, any such distributions, which maycash items) on an unconsolidated basis are composed of assets that could be material in amount.
Holdersconsidered investment securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that The Carlyle Group Inc. is an inadvertent investment company by virtue of the preferred units have limited voting rights.
Holders40% test in section 3(a)(1)(C) of the preferred units generally have no voting rights and have noneInvestment Company Act as described in the second bullet point above. In addition, we believe that The Carlyle Group Inc. is not an investment company under section 3(b)(1) of the voting rights given to holders of our common units, subject to certain exceptions. In particular, if distributions onInvestment Company Act because it is primarily engaged in a non-investment company business.
The Investment Company Act and the preferred units have not been declared and

79






paidrules thereunder contain detailed parameters for the equivalentorganization and operation of sixinvestment companies. Among other things, the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder limit or more quarterly distribution periods, whether or not consecutive (a “Nonpayment Event”), holders of the preferred units, together as a classprohibit transactions with holders of any other series of parity units then outstanding with like voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to the board of directors of our general partner, subject to the terms and to the limited extent provided in our partnership agreement. When quarterly distributions have been declared and paidaffiliates, impose limitations on the preferred units for four consecutive quarters following a Nonpayment Event, the right of the holders of the preferred units and such parity units to elect these two additional directors will cease, the terms of office of these two additional directors will forthwith terminate, the number of directors constituting the board of directors of our general partner will be reduced accordingly and, for purposes of determining whether a subsequent Nonpayment Event has occurred, the number of quarterly distributions payable on the preferred units that have not been declared and paid shall reset to zero.
There is no limitation on our issuance of debt securities orand equity securities, that rank equally with the preferred units and we may issue equity securities that rank senior to the preferred units.
The terms of the preferred units do not limit our ability to incur indebtedness or other liabilities. As a result, we and our subsidiaries may incur indebtedness or other liabilities that will rank senior to the preferred units. In addition, while we do not currently have any outstanding equity securities that rank equally with or senior to the preferred units, we may issue additional equity securities that rank equally with the preferred units without limitation and, with the approval of the holders of two-thirds of the Series A Preferred Units and all other series of voting preferred units, acting as a single class, any equity securities that rank senior to the preferred units. The incurrence of indebtedness or other liabilities that will rank senior to the preferred units orgenerally prohibit the issuance of securities ranking equallyoptions and impose certain governance requirements. We intend to conduct our operations so that The Carlyle Group Inc. will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If anything were to happen that would cause The Carlyle Group Inc. to be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, requirements imposed by the Investment Company Act, including limitations on our capital structure, ability to transact business with affiliates (including us) and ability to compensate key employees, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently conducted, impair the agreements and arrangements between and among The Carlyle Group Inc. and our senior Carlyle professionals and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be required to limit the amount of investments that we make as a principal or seniorotherwise conduct our business in a manner that does not subject us to the preferred units may reduce the amount available for distributionsregistration and the amount recoverable by holdersother requirements of the preferred unitsInvestment Company Act.
The consolidation of investment funds, holding companies or operating businesses of our portfolio companies could make it more difficult to understand the operating performance of the Company and could create operational risks for the Company.
Under applicable U.S. GAAP standards, we may be required to consolidate certain of our investment funds, holding companies or operating businesses if we determine that these entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, as discussed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidation of such entities could make it difficult for an investor to differentiate our assets, liabilities, and results of operations apart from the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the consolidated VIEs. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are not available to meet our liquidity requirements and, similarly, we generally have not guaranteed or assumed any obligation for repayment of the liabilities of the consolidated VIEs.
    As of December 31, 2022, the total assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.consolidated balance sheets were $7.2 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively.
Risks Related to U.S. Taxation
Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments (companies) or fund income.
Our structure involves complex provisionseffective tax rate and tax liability is based on the application of U.S. federalcurrent income tax lawlaws, regulations and treaties. These laws, regulations and treaties are complex, and the manner that they apply to us and our funds is sometimes open to interpretation. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for which no clear precedentincome taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. Although management believes its application of current laws, regulations and treaties to be correct and sustainable upon examination by the tax authorities, the tax authorities could challenge our interpretation, resulting in additional tax liability or authorityadjustment to our income tax provision that could increase our effective tax rate.
96


There may be available. Our structure also is subject to potential legislative, judicialchanges in tax laws or administrative change and differing interpretations possibly on a retroactive basis.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of common and preferred unitholders depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. You should be aware that the U.S. federal income tax rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, frequently resulting in revised interpretations of established concepts, statutory changes, revisions to regulations and other modifications and interpretations. The IRS pays close attention to the proper application of tax laws (possibly with retrospective effect) in jurisdictions in which we operate, are managed, are advised, are promoted or invest. Such changes could materially increase the amount of taxes, we, our portfolio companies, our investors, or our employees and other key personnel and service providers are required to partnerships. The present U.S. federalpay. In particular, both the level and basis of taxation may change. Changes to taxation treaties or interpretations of taxation treaties between one or more such jurisdictions and the countries through which we hold investments, or the introduction of, or change to, EU directives may adversely affect our ability to efficiently realize income or capital gains and to efficiently repatriate income and capital gains from the jurisdictions in which they arise. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic could prompt governments to increase taxes to fund relief measures, and/or assert taxing jurisdiction on account of remote working conditions, as discussed below. Consequently, it is possible that we may face unfavorable tax treatment that may materially adversely affect the value of an investmentour investments or the feasibility of making investments in certain countries. This could significantly affect returns to investors, cause us to revalue our common units may be modified by administrative, legislative net deferred tax assets and/or judicial interpretation at any time, possibly onhave a retroactive basis,material change to our effective tax rate and any such action may affect investmentstax liabilities.
For example, the TCJA, and commitments previously made. Changesguidance interpreting the TCJA since its enactment in 2017, have resulted in many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws, and interpretations thereofsome of which could make it more difficult adversely impact us and/or impossible to meet the exception that allows us to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, referred to as the “Qualifying Income Exception,” (for example, proposed regulations that would treat controlled foreign corporation ("CFC") Subpart F and passive foreign investment company ("PFIC") qualified electing fund income inclusions as non-qualifying income exceptour portfolio companies, including changes to the extent earnings and profits attributable to the inclusions are distributed for the taxable year), affect or cause us to change our investments and commitments, affect the tax considerations of an investment in us, change the character or treatment of portions of our income (including, for instance, the treatmenttaxation of carried interest, as ordinary income rather than capital gain) and adversely affect an investment in our common units. For example, as discussed above under “— Risks Related to Our Company— In past years, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would have in some cases after a ten-year transition period, precluded us from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or required us to hold carried interest through taxable subsidiary corporations. If any similar legislation were to be enacted and apply to us, the after tax income and gain related to our business could be reduced.”
Our organizational documents and governing agreements will permit our general partner to modify our limited partnership agreement from time to time, without the consent of the common or preferred unitholders, to address certain changes in U.S. federal income tax regulations, legislation or interpretation. In some circumstances, such revisions could have a material adverse impact on some or all common and preferred unitholders. For instance, our general partner could elect at some point to treat us as an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal (and applicable state) income tax purposes. If our general partner were to do this, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning our common and preferred units would be materially different (including as a result of all of our future net income being subject to a level of corporate tax).

80






Moreover, we will apply certain assumptions and conventions in an attempt to comply with applicable rules of the Internal Revenue Code and to report allocations of income, gain, deduction, loss and credit to common unitholders and allocations of gross income and gains to preferred unitholders in a manner that reflects such unitholders’ beneficial ownership of partnership items, taking into account variation in ownership interests during each taxable year because of trading activity. As a result, a common unitholder transferring units may be allocated income, gain, loss and deductions and a preferred unitholder may be allocated gross income and gains realized after the date of transfer. However, those assumptions and conventions may not be in compliance with all aspects of applicable tax requirements. It is possible that the IRS will assert successfully that the conventions and assumptions used by us do not satisfy the technical requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and/or Treasury regulations and could require that items of income, gain, deductions, loss or credit, including interest deductions, be adjusted, reallocated or disallowed in a manner that adversely affects common and preferred unitholders.
If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax or state tax purposes or otherwise became subject to additional entity level taxation (including as a result of changes to current law), then the amount of cash available for distribution to common and preferred unitholders could be substantially reduced and the value of our units could be adversely affected.
We are currently treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which requires that 90% or more of our gross income for every taxable year consist of qualifying income, as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code and that our partnership not be registered under the Investment Company Act. Qualifying income generally includes dividends, interest, capital gains from the sale or other disposition of stocks and securities and certain other forms of investment income. We may not meet these requirements or current law may change so as to cause, in either event, us to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject us to U.S. federal income tax. Moreover, the anticipated after-tax benefit of an investment in our common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We have not requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on this or any other matter affecting us.
If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at the applicable tax rates. The TCJA included permanent reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective as of January 1, 2018. In addition, we would likely be liable for state and local income and/or franchise tax on all our income. Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses, deductions or credits would otherwise flow through to you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, the amount of cash available for distributions to holders of our common and preferred units could be substantially reduced which could cause a reduction in the value of our units. The same changes would result if our general partner caused us to be taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Current law may change, causing us to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal or state income tax purposes or otherwise subjecting us to additional entity level taxation. See “—Risks Related to Our Company—In past years, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would have in some cases after a ten-year transition period, precluded us from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or required us to hold carried interest through taxable subsidiary corporations. If any similar legislation were to be enacted and apply to us, the after tax income and gain related to our business could be reduced.” For example, several states are evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity level taxation through the imposition of state income, franchise or other forms of taxation. If any state were to impose a tax upon us as an entity, our distributions to you would be reduced.
Recently enacted U.S. federal income tax reform could adversely affect us.
On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the TCJA, which has resulted in fundamental changes to the Code. Somedeductibility of the key elements of the TCJA include (i) the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, (ii) newcertain interest expense and compensation, limitations on the utilization of net operating losses, (iii) partial limitations on the deductibility of business interest expense, (iv) a longer three-year holding period requirement for carried interest to be treated as long-term capital gain, (v) certain modifications to Section 162(m) of the Code and (vi) general changes to the taxation of corporations and businesses, including modifications to cost recovery rules and changes relating to the scope and timing of U.S. taxation onof earnings from international business operations. Although weoperations (including through an expanded definition of “controlled foreign corporations,” introduction of a minimum tax on “global intangible low-taxed income” (“GILTI”), and changes to the creditability of foreign taxes). Final foreign tax credit regulations published on January 4, 2022, which are continuingpart of a series of foreign tax credit regulations issued since the enactment of the TCJA, introduce significant fundamental changes to analyze the impactdefinition of TCJAwhat is considered a creditable foreign income tax, including an attribution requirement, which could have an adverse impact on us, our portfolio companies, and/or our investors. Further, foreign, state and local governments may enact tax laws in response to the TCJA that could result in further changes to foreign, state and local taxation and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
In addition, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) introduced a 15% alternative minimum tax on the “adjusted financial statement income” of certain large corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain actual and deemed stock repurchases, both of which become effective in 2023. We expect to be an applicable corporation that is subject to the alternative minimum tax, as well as a covered corporation that could be subject to the 1% excise tax. The alternative minimum tax in particular requires complex computations to be performed that were not previously required in U.S. tax law, significant judgments to be made in interpretation of the provisions of the IRA, significant estimates in calculations, and the preparation and analysis of information not previously relevant or regularly produced. The U.S. Department of the Treasury, the IRS, and other standard-setting bodies are expected to issue guidance on how the alternative minimum tax provisions of the IRA will be applied or otherwise administered that may differ from our interpretations. As we do not expectcomplete our analysis of the IRA, collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret any additional guidance, we may make adjustments to provisional amounts that we have recorded that may materially impact our provision for income taxes in the period in which adjustments are made.
State and local governments may propose new legislation that if passed could result in fundamental changes in state and local tax reform tolaw and regulations, which may have a material impact on the amount of taxes we are required to pay. In particular, both the level and basis of taxation may change. For example, the State of New York has issued draft regulations that, if enacted in current form, could negatively impact certain corporate managers of investments funds by sourcing more of their management or advisory fee income to New York state. We have not yet determined the effect of these draft regulations on our tax provision.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries relaxed the application of existing tax rules applying to remote working. Governments, along with the EU and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (the “OECD”), are now renewing their focus in this area, in many cases ending concessionary treatment that they applied during the pandemic, and with the potential for taxing jurisdiction to be asserted in circumstances where this would not historically have been the case. In particular, some countries are implementing, or considering implementing, new legislation relating to remote working. Our employees and other key personnel and service providers remain more diversely located than before the pandemic, and developments in this area could potentially lead to increased tax and compliance costs, including as result of increased payroll tax and social security costs for our entities, and our entities being subject to tax in jurisdictions where they are not currently considered to have a taxable presence. If our employees or other key personnel and service providers bear increased tax costs, or if we need to take a stricter approach on working practices, this may also affect our ability to retain such individuals.
International tax developments may also significantly impact us. Pursuant to the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) Project, many individual jurisdictions have introduced domestic legislation implementing certain of the
97


BEPS action points. Several of the areas of tax law (including double taxation treaties) on which the BEPS Project focuses are relevant to our current taxes. Weability to efficiently realize income or capital gains and to efficiently repatriate income and capital gains from the jurisdictions in which they arise and, depending on the extent to and manner in which relevant jurisdictions have implemented (or implement, as the case may be) changes in those areas of tax law (including double taxation treaties), our ability to do those things may be adversely impacted. Many of the jurisdictions in which we have made (or will make) investments have now ratified, accepted and approved the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument that brings into force a number of relevant changes to double tax treaties within scope. While these changes continue to examinebe introduced, there remains uncertainty as to whether and, if so, to what extent we may benefit from the protections afforded by such treaties and whether our funds may look to their partners in order to derive tax treaty or other benefits. This position is likely to remain uncertain for a number of years. In addition, press speculation and heightened focus on the structures commonly used in the private equity industry in general, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation, which may ultimately be damaging to our business.
In addition, the EU has adopted (and subsequently extended) an Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (the “ATAD rules”), which directly implements some of the BEPS Project action points within EU law and requires EU Member States to transpose the ATAD rules into their domestic laws. The most recent provisions of the ATAD rules to come into effect were rules targeting reverse hybrids, which generally apply from January 1, 2022. The ATAD rules and the domestic laws that implement them are extensive, complex and could apply to a wide range of scenarios. While certain countries have issued guidance on the application of these rules, we are still waiting for the issuance of guidance from several other countries and at this stage, the impact thisof the ATAD rules and their application to our entities remains uncertain. These rules could have an adverse tax reform legislation may haveimpact on our firm, funds, investors and/or our portfolio companies.
Moreover, a number of further proposals from the European Commission have or are expected to be issued shortly that further enhance and move beyond the work on the BEPS Project, including, but not limited to, the proposal issued on December 22, 2021, for a Council Directive to further extend the scope of the ATAD rules. This proposal calls for provisions to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes within the EU (the “Unshell Proposal”). In addition, a proposal published on May 11, 2022, for a Council Directive seeks to reduce the difference in tax treatment between equity and debt financing (the “Debt-Equity Bias Reduction Allowance” or the “DEBRA Proposal”). There is considerable uncertainty surrounding the development and implementation of these proposals (including as a result of a series of non-binding amendments put forward by the European Parliament during 2022 in respect of the Unshell Proposal). If implemented, the proposals could, among other things, impose additional taxes on our entities (including by imposing additional limitations on the deductibility of interest payments) and/or impact our ability to repatriate investment returns and/or international profits in a tax efficient way resulting in additional tax costs and/or reporting, disclosure and computation obligations (which could result in increased administrative and compliance costs) for our entities.
The OECD is also leading work on proposals, commonly referred to as “BEPS 2.0,” which, if implemented, would fundamentally change the international tax system. The proposals are based on two “pillars” involving the reallocation of taxing rights (“Pillar One”) and a new global minimum corporate tax rate (“Pillar Two”).
Under Pillar One, multinational enterprises (“MNEs”) with an annual global turnover of at least EUR 20 billion (although this turnover threshold may potentially be reduced in the future) will be subject to rules allocating 25% of profits in excess of a 10% profit margin to the jurisdictions within which they carry on business (subject to threshold rules). MNEs carrying on specific low-risk activities are excluded, including our“regulated financial services” (although the scope of this exclusion has not yet been confirmed). Pillar Two imposes a minimum effective tax rate of 15% on MNEs that have consolidated revenues of at least EUR 750 million in at least two out of the last four years. Pillar Two introduces two related tax measures (the “GloBE” rules): the income inclusion rule (“IIR”) imposes a top up tax on a parent entity where a constituent member of the MNE group has low-taxed income, while the undertaxed payment rule (“UTPR”) applies to intra-group payments if the constituent member’s income is not taxed by an IIR. In addition, a subject to tax rule (“STTR”) will permit source jurisdictions to impose limited withholding taxes on low-taxed related party payments, which will be creditable against the GloBE rules tax liability. The proposals are complex and subject to significant uncertainty, consultation in respect of certain aspects of the rules is ongoing and we await further guidance from the OECD. It is anticipated that certain classes of entities that are typically exempt from tax will be outside of the scope of Pillar Two, including investment funds and portfolio companies. The impactreal estate investment vehicles (as respectively defined), which are the ultimate parent entity of this tax reformthe MNE group (and certain holding vehicles of such entities); however, the application of these exemptions to our entities remains open to significant uncertainty.
Although the implementation of the Pillar One and Pillar Two proposals is scheduled for 2024, important details, in particular on holdersthe implementation of our preferred or common units is uncertain and couldPillar One, are still awaited. On December 20, 2021, the OECD released Pillar Two model rules providing a template for jurisdictions to translate the GloBE rules into domestic law. On December 15, 2022, the EU adopted a Council Directive that requires certain GloBE rules to be adverse. Each unitholder should consult with its tax advisor regarding the implications of tax reform on holding one of our units.

transposed into EU member states’ national laws by
81
98







December 31, 2023, and a number of other countries, including the U.K., are currently proposing to implement core elements of the Pillar Two proposal with effect from the start of 2024. In addition, South Korea has enacted Pillar Two global minimum tax rules into its domestic legislation, with effect from the start of 2024. It is likely that many other countries will also seek to implement their own domestic minimum tax proposals as well as potentially digital services taxes. There remains significant uncertainty as to the interaction of these rules and, subject to the development and implementation of both Pillar One and Pillar Two (including the details of any domestic legislation, double taxation treaty amendments and multilateral agreements that may be necessary to implement them), effective tax rates could increase for our firm, funds, portfolio companies and investors, and it is likely that our entities will be subject to significant additional compliance and/or reporting obligations. Any tax laws, regulations or treaties newly enacted or enacted in the future may also cause us to revalue our net deferred tax assets and have a material change to our effective tax rate and tax liabilities, as a result.
Our commonMoreover, the Netherlands continued to provide additional updates to its withholding tax on dividends. As of January 1, 2024, dividend distributions made by Dutch companies to “associated beneficiaries” established in blacklisted jurisdictions and preferred unitholdersto “associated beneficiaries” established in non-blacklisted jurisdictions in case of situations that are deemed to be “abusive” may be subject to U.S. federal incomea conditional withholding tax. The applicable tax on their share of our taxable income, regardless of whether they receive any cash distributions from us.
As long as 90% of our gross income for each taxable year constitutes qualifying income as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code and we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act on a continuing basis, and assuming thererate is no change in law or relevant change in our structure, we will be treated, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as a partnership and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Accordingly, our common unitholders will be required to take into account their allocable share of our items of income, gain, loss and deduction, and our preferred unitholders will be required to take into account their allocable share of our gross income and gain. Distributions to our common and preferred unitholders generally will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes onlylinked to the extent the amount distributed exceeds their tax basis in the units. That treatment contrasts with the treatment of a shareholder in a corporation. For example, a shareholder in a corporation who receives a distribution of earnings from the corporation generally will report the distribution as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In contrast, a holder of our common and preferred units who receives a distribution of earnings from us will not report the distribution as dividend income (and will treat the distribution as taxable only to the extent the amount distributed exceeds the unitholder’s tax basis in the units), but will instead report the holder’s allocable share of items of our income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, you may be subject to U.S. federal, state, local and possibly, in some cases, foreign income taxation on your allocable share of our items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit (including our allocable share of those items of any entity in which we invest that is treated as a partnership or is otherwise subject to tax on a flow through basis) for each of our taxable years ending with or within your taxable years, regardless of whether or not you receive cash distributions from us. See “—Risks Related to Our Company—In past years, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation that would have in some cases after a ten-year transition period, precluded us from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or required us to hold carried interest through taxable subsidiary corporations. If any similar legislation were to be enacted and apply to us, the after tax income and gain related to our business could be reduced.”
Our common and preferred unitholders may not receive cash distributions equal to their allocable share of our net taxable income or even the tax liability that results from that income. In addition, certain of our holdings, including holdings, if any, in a CFC and a PFIC may produce taxable income prior to the receipt of cash relating to such income, and common and preferred unitholders that are U.S. taxpayers will be required to take such income into account in determining their taxable income. In the event of an inadvertent termination of our partnership status for which the IRS has granted us limited relief, each holder of our common and preferred units may be obligated to make such adjustments as the IRS may require in order to maintain our status as a partnership. Such adjustments may require persons holding our common and preferred units to recognize additional amounts in income during the years in which they hold such units.

Amounts distributed in respect of the Series A Preferred Units could be treated as “guaranteed payments” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The treatment of interests in a partnership such as the Series A Preferred Units and the payments received in respect of such interests is uncertain. The IRS may contend that payments on the Series A Preferred Units represent “guaranteed payments,” which would generally be treated as ordinary income but may not have the same character when received by a holder as our gross income had when earned by us. If distributions on the Series A Preferred Units are treated as “guaranteed payments,” a holder would always be treated as receiving income equal to the amount distributed or accrued, regardless of the amount of our gross income. Our partnership agreement provides that all holders agree to treat payments made in respect of the Series A Preferred Units as other than guaranteed payments.
The Carlyle Group L.P.’s interest in certain of our businesses will be held through Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. and Carlyle Holdings III GP L.P., which will be treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes; such corporations may be liable for significant taxes and may create other adverse tax consequences, which could potentially adversely affect the value of your investment.
In light of the publicly traded partnership rules under U.S. federal income tax law and other requirements, The Carlyle Group L.P. holds its interest in certain of our businesses through Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. and Carlyle Holdings III GP L.P., which are treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. and Carlyle Holdings III GP L.P. could be liable for significant U.S. federal income taxes and applicable state, local and other taxes that would not otherwise be incurred, which could adversely affect the value of your investment.

82






Complying with certain tax-related requirements may cause us to invest through foreign or domestic corporations subject tohighest corporate income tax or enter into acquisitions, borrowings, financings or arrangements we may not have otherwise entered into.
In order for us to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation, we must meet the Qualifying Income Exception discussed above on a continuing basis and we must not be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. In order to effect such treatment, we (or our subsidiaries) may be required to invest through foreign or domestic corporations subject to corporate income tax, forgo attractive investment opportunities or enter into acquisitions, borrowings, financings or other transactions we may not have otherwise entered into. This may adversely affect our ability to operate solely to maximize our cash flow.
Our structure also may impede our ability to engage in certain corporate acquisitive transactions because we generally intend to hold all of our assets through the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. In addition, we may be unable to participate in certain corporate reorganization transactions that would be tax-free to our common and preferred unit holders if we were a corporation.

Tax gain or loss on disposition of our common or preferred units could be more or less than expected.
If you sell your common or preferred units, you will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and the adjusted tax basis in those units. Prior distributions to you in excess of the total net taxable income allocated to you, which decreased the tax basis in your units, will in effect become taxable income to you if the units are sold at a price greater than your tax basis in those units, even if the price is less than the original cost. A portion of the amount realized, whether or not representing gain, may be ordinary income to you.
Because we do not intend to make, or cause to be made, an otherwise available election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code to adjust our asset basis or the asset basis of certain of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, a holder of common units could be allocated more taxable income in respect of those common units prior to disposition than if we had made such an election.
We have not made and currently do not intend to make, or cause to be made, an election to adjust asset basis under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to us or Carlyle Holdings II L.P. If no such election is made, there generally will be no adjustment to the basis of the assets of Carlyle Holdings II L.P. upon our acquisition of interests in Carlyle Holdings II L.P. in connection with our initial public offering, or subsequent offerings, or to our assets or to the assets of Carlyle Holdings II L.P. upon a subsequent transferee’s acquisition of common units from a prior holder of such common units, even if the purchase price for those interests or units, as applicable, is greater than the share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets or the assets of Carlyle Holdings II L.P. attributable to those interests or units immediately prior to the acquisition. Consequently, upon a sale of an asset by us or Carlyle Holdings II L.P. gain allocable to a holder of common units could include built-in gain in the asset existing at the time we acquired those interests, or such holder acquired such units, which built-in gain would otherwise generally be eliminated if we had made a Section 754 election.
Non-U.S. persons face unique U.S. tax issues from owning common and preferred units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.
In light of our intended investment activities, we generally do not expect to be treated as engaged in a U.S. trade or business or to generate significant amounts of income treated as effectively connected income with respect to non-U.S. holders of our common and preferred units (“ECI”). However, there can be no assurance that we will not generate ECI currently or in the future and, subject to the qualifying income rules, we are under no obligation to minimize ECI. To the extent our income is treated as ECI, non-U.S. holders generally would be subject to withholding tax on their allocable shares of such income, would be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return for such year reporting their allocable shares of income effectively connected with such trade or business and any other income treated as ECI, and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular U.S. tax rates on any such income (state and local income taxes and filings may also apply in that event). In addition, certain income of non-U.S. holders from U.S. sources not connected to any such U.S. trade or business conducted by us could be treated as ECI. Non-U.S. holders that are corporations may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax on their allocable share of such income. In addition, certain income from U.S. sources that is not ECI allocable to non-U.S. holders will be reduced by withholding taxes imposed at the highest effective applicable tax rate.
Any gain recognized by a non-U.S. holder on the sale or exchange of common units that is deemed to be effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business will also be treated as ECI. The TCJA includes a provision effective as of November 27, 2017 treating gain or loss from the sale, exchange or disposition of a partnership interest by a non-U.S. holder as ECI to the extent that the non-U.S. holder would have recognized ECI had the partnership sold all its assets for their fair market value on the date of the sale or exchange. In addition, effective after December 31, 2017, the legislation requires the transferee of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business to withhold 10 percent of the transferor’s amount realized

83






(gross purchase price) on the sale, exchange or other disposition of such partnership interest, unless an applicable non-foreign person affidavit is furnished by the transferor or another exception applies. Pursuant to Notice 2018-8, the Department of the Treasury and the IRS have temporarily suspended the application of the 10 percent withholding obligation in the case of the sale, exchange or other disposition of certain publicly traded partnership interests pending further guidance. While we generally do not expect to directly or indirectly own ECI producing assets in light of our intended investment activities, there can be no assurance that we will not hold ECI assets currently or in the future and subject to the qualifying income rules, we are under no obligation to minimize ECI. Many issues and the overall effect of this legislation on us are uncertain and still evolving and we will continue to assess the impact of this legislation.
Generally, under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”) provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, certain non-U.S. persons are subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same mannerrelevant year (being 25.8% in 2023). A draft bill, including amendments, on a proposed dividend withholding tax exit charge has been presented to parliament. If the bill is accepted, it would be retroactively effective as U.S. personsof December 8, 2021. We are evaluating and monitoring the impact of these changes, which could result in additional withholding taxes being levied on any gain realized on the disposition of an interest, other than an interest solely as a creditor, in U.S. real property. In December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 was signed into law providing some exemptions from FIRPTA tax for certain types of non-U.S. persons. An interest in U.S. real property includes stock in a U.S. corporation (except for certain stock of publicly traded U.S. corporations) if interests in U.S. real property constitute 50% or more by value of the sum of the corporation’s assets used in a trade or business, its U.S. real property interests and its interests in real property located outside the United States (a “United States Real Property Holding Corporation” or “USRPHC”). The FIRPTA tax applies to certain non-U.S. holders holding an interest in a partnership that realizes gain in respect of an interest in U.S. real property or an interest in a USRPHC. We may, from time to time, make certain investments (other than direct investments in U.S. real property), for example, through one of our investment funds held by Carlyle Holdings II GP L.L.C. that could constitute investments in U.S. real property or USRPHCs. If we make such investments certain non U.S. holders will be subject to U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA on such holder’s allocable sharerepatriation of any gain we realize on the disposition of a FIRPTA interest and will be subject to the tax return filing requirements regarding ECI discussed above. Certain foreign pension funds (“Qualified Foreign Pension Funds”) are exempt from FIRPTA on their disposition of U.S. real property interests held directly or indirectly through one or more partnerships. A Qualified Foreign Pension Fund is a corporation, trust or other arrangement which (1) is created or organized outside of the United States, (2) is established to provide retirement or pension benefits to current or former employees of one or more employers in consideration for services rendered, (3) does not have any single participant or beneficiary with a right to more than 5% of the fund’s assets or income, (4) is subject to government regulation and provides annual information reporting about its beneficiaries to the relevant tax authorities in the country in which it is established or operates and (5) with respect to which, under the laws of the country in which it is established or operates, contributions to it are deductible or excludable from gross income or taxed at a reduced rate, or taxation of its investment income is deferred or taxed at a reduced rate.
Tax-exempt entities face unique tax issues from owning common or preferred units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.
In light of our intended investment activities, we generally do not expect to make investments directly in operating businesses that generate significant amounts of unrelated business taxable income for tax-exempt holders of our common units (“UBTI”). However, certain of our investments may be treated as debt-financed investments, which may give rise to debt-financed UBTI. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will not generate UBTI currently or in the future and, subject to the qualifying income rules, we are under no obligation to minimize UBTI. Consequently, a holder of common units that is a tax-exempt organization may be subject to “unrelated business income tax” to the extent that its allocable share of our income consists of UBTI. A tax-exempt partner of a partnership could be treated as earning UBTI if the partnership regularly engages in a trade or business that is unrelated to the exempt function of the tax-exempt partner, if the partnership derives income from debt-financed property or if the partnership interest itself is debt-financed. The TCJA provides that losses from one unrelated trade or business cannot be used to offset income from another trade or business for purposes of calculating a tax-exempt entity's UBTI.

We cannot match transferors and transferees of common or preferred units, and we will therefore adopt certain income tax accounting positions that may not conform to all aspects of applicable tax requirements. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could adversely affect the value of our units.
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common or preferred units, we will adopt depreciation, amortization and other tax accounting positions that may not conform to all aspects of existing Treasury regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those positions could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits available to our common and preferred unitholders. It also could affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of gain on the sale of common or preferred units and could have a negative impact on the value of our common units or result in audits of and adjustments to our unitholders’ tax returns.

84






In addition, our taxable income and losses will be determined and apportioned among investors using conventions we regard as consistent with applicable law. As a result, a common unitholder transferring units, may be allocated income, gain, loss and deductions, and a preferred unitholder may be allocated gross income and gains realized by us after the date of transfer. Similarly, a transferee of common units may be allocated income, gain, loss and deduction and a transferee or preferred units may be allocated gross income and gains realized by us prior to the date of the transferee’s acquisition of our units. A transferee may also bear the cost of withholding tax imposed with respect to income allocated to a transferor through a reduction in the cash distributed to the transferee.generated.
Pursuant to the TCJA, beginning for partnership tax years beginning after 2017, the sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and profit interests will no longer result in the termination of our partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We will instead be treated as continuing to exist for U.S. federal income tax purposes even if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month period.
We may be liable for adjustments to our tax returns as a result of partnership audit legislation.
Legislation was enacted in 2015 that significantly changed the rules for U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships. Such audits will be conducted at the partnership level, and unless a partnership qualifies for and affirmatively elects an alternative procedure, any adjustments to the amount of tax due (including interest and penalties) will be payable by the partnership. Under the elective alternative procedure, a partnership would issue information returns to persons who were partners in the audited year, who would then be required to take the adjustments into account in calculating their own tax liability, and the partnership would not be liable for the adjustments. If a partnership elects the alternative procedure for a given adjustment, the amount of taxes for which its partners would be liable would be increased by any applicable penalties and a special interest charge.  There can be no assurance that we will be eligible to make such an election or that we will, in fact, make such an election for any given adjustment. If we do not or are not able to make such an election, then (1) our then-current common and preferred unitholders, in the aggregate, could indirectly bear income tax liabilities in excess of the aggregate amount of taxes that would have been due had we elected the alternative procedure, and (2) a given common or preferred unitholder may indirectly bear taxes attributable to income allocable to other common and preferred unitholders or former common and preferred unitholders, including taxes (as well as interest and penalties) with respect to periods prior to such holder’s ownership of common or preferred units. Amounts available for distribution to our common and preferred unitholders may be reduced as a result of our obligation to pay any taxes associated with an adjustment. Many issues and the overall effect of this legislation on us are uncertain and still evolving and we will continue to assess the impact of this legislation.
Certain U.S. holders of common and preferred units are subject to additional tax on “net investment income.”
U.S. holders that are individuals, estates or trusts are currently subject to a Medicare tax of 3.8% on “net investment income” (or undistributed “net investment income,” in the case of estates and trusts) for each taxable year, with such tax applying to the lesser of such income or the excess of such person’s adjusted gross income (with certain adjustments) over a specified amount. Net investment income includes net income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents and net gain attributable to the disposition of investment property. Net income and gain attributable to an investment in the Partnership will be included in a U.S. holder’s “net investment income” subject to this Medicare tax.
Common and preferred unitholders may be subject to state and local taxes and return filing requirements as a result of investing in our units.
In addition to U.S. federal income taxes, our common and preferred unitholders may be subject to other taxes, including state and local taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we do business or own property now or in the future, even if our common and preferred unitholders do not reside in any of those jurisdictions. Our common and preferred unitholders may also be required to file state and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these jurisdictions. Further, common and preferred unitholders may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. It is the responsibility of each common and preferred unitholder to file all U.S. federal, state and local tax returns that may be required of such unitholder. Our counsel has not rendered an opinion on the state or local tax consequences of an investment in our common or preferred units.

85






We may not be able to furnish to each unitholder specific tax information within 90 days after the close of each calendar year, which means that holders of common and preferred units who are U.S. taxpayers should anticipate the need to file annually a request for an extension of the due date of their income tax return. In addition, it is possible that common and preferred unitholders may be required to file amended income tax returns.
As a publicly traded partnership, our operating results, including distributions of income, dividends, gains, losses or deductions and adjustments to carrying basis, will be reported on Schedule K-1 and distributed to each unitholder annually. Although we currently intend to distribute Schedule K-1s on or around 90 days after the end of our fiscal year, it may require longer than 90 days after the end of our fiscal year to obtain the requisite information from all lower-tier entities so that K-1s may be prepared for us. For this reason, holders of common and preferred units who are U.S. taxpayers should anticipate that they may need to file annually with the IRS (and certain states) a request for an extension past April 15 or the otherwise applicable due date of their income tax return for the taxable year.

In addition, it is possible that holders of common and preferred units will be required to file amended income tax returns as a result of adjustments to items on the corresponding income tax returns of the partnership. Any obligation for holders common and preferred units to file amended income tax returns for that or any other reason, including any costs incurred in the preparation or filing of such returns, is the responsibility of each common unitholder.
We may hold or acquire certain investments through an entity classified as a PFIC or CFC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Certain of our investments may be in foreign corporations or may be acquired through a foreign subsidiary that would be classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and may be treated as a PFIC or a CFC. The TCJA imposes a deemed repatriation toll charge, as part of a move to a territorial system, on a U.S. person's pro-rata share of a CFC's previously untaxed foreign earnings. In addition, the TCJA expanded the definition of companies that could be CFCs which could have adverse implications to U.S. unitholders. U.S. holders of common and preferred units indirectly owning an interest in a PFIC or a CFC may experience adverse U.S. tax consequences.
Changes in U.S. and foreign tax lawregulations could adversely affect our ability to raise funds from certain foreign investors.investors and increase compliance costs.
Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), a broadly defined class of foreign financial institutions are required toWe must comply with a complicated and expansive information tax reporting regime or be subjectregimes in multiple jurisdictions, which require us to certain U.S. withholding taxes. In connection with this regulation, various foreign governments have entered into intergovernmental agreements, or IGAs, with the U.S. government. The reporting obligations imposed under FATCA require foreign financial institutionsperform due diligence and to enter into agreements with the IRS to obtain and disclosereport information about certain account holders and investors to the IRS (or in the case of certain foreign financial institutions that are resident in a jurisdiction that has entered into an IGA to implement this legislation, the foreign financial institutions may comply with revised diligence and reporting obligations of such IGA). Additionally, certain non-U.S. entities that are not foreign financial institutions are required to provide certain certifications or other information regarding their U.S. beneficial ownership or be subject to certain U.S. withholding taxes.investors. Failure to comply with these requirements could expose us and/or our investors to a 30% withholding tax on certain U.S. payments (and beginningresult in 2019, a 30% withholding tax on gross proceeds from the sale of U.S. stocks and securities), and possibly limit our ability to open bank accounts and secure funding in the global capital markets. Theincreased administrative and economiccompliance costs of compliance with FATCA may discourage some foreign investors from investing in U.S. funds, which could adversely affectfor our ability to raise funds from these investors. In addition, we expect to incur additional expenses related to our compliance with such regulations. Other countries, such as Luxembourg, United Kingdom and the Cayman Islands, have implemented common reporting standards similar to that of FATCAinvestment entities and, in some cases, have imposed penalties for non-compliance.could subject our investment entities to increased withholding taxes or monetary penalties.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES
Our principal executive offices are located in leased office space at 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. We also lease the space for our other 30 offices, including our office in Arlington, Virginia, which houses our treasury, tax and finance functions.28 offices. We do not own any real property. We consider these facilities to be suitable and adequate for the management and operation of our business.

86






ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, the PartnershipCompany is a party to litigation, investigations, inquiries, employment-related matters, disputes and other potential claims. Certain of these matters are described below. The Partnership is not currently ableSee Note 10 to estimate the reasonably possible amount of loss or range of loss, in excess of amounts accrued, for the matters that have not been resolved. The Partnership does not believe it is probable that the outcome of any existing litigation, investigations, disputes or other potential claims will materially affect the Partnership or theseconsolidated financial statements in excess of amounts accrued. The Partnership believes that the matters described below are without merit and intends to vigorously contest such allegations for the matters that have not been resolved.
Along with many other companies and individuals in the financial sector, the Partnership and Carlyle Mezzanine Partners, L.P. (“CMP”) are named as defendants in Foy v. Austin Capital, a case filed in June 2009 in state court in New Mexico, which purports to be a qui tam suit on behalf of the State of New Mexico under the state Fraud Against Taxpayers Act (“FATA”). The suit alleges that investment decisions by New Mexico public investment funds were improperly influenced by campaign contributions and payments to politically connected placement agents. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, actual damages for lost income, rescission of the investment transactions described in the complaint and disgorgement of all fees received. In September 2017, the Court dismissed the lawsuit and the plaintiffs then filed an appeal seeking to reverse that decision. The Attorney General may also pursue its own recovery from the defendants in the action.
Carlyle Capital Corporation Limited (“CCC”) was a fund sponsored by the Partnership that invested in AAA-rated residential mortgage backed securities on a highly leveraged basis. In March of 2008, amidst turmoil throughout the mortgage markets and money markets, CCC filed for insolvency protection in Guernsey. The Guernsey liquidators who took control of CCC in March 2008 filed a suit on July 7, 2010 against the Partnership, certain of its affiliates and the former directors of CCC in the Royal Court of Guernsey seeking more than $1.0 billion in damages in a case styled Carlyle Capital Corporation Limited v. Conway et al. On September 4, 2017, the Royal Court of Guernsey ruled that the Partnership and Directors of CCC acted reasonably and appropriately in the management and governance of CCC and that none of the Partnership, its affiliates or former directors of CCC had any liability. In December 2017, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the trial court decision and the Partnership is preparing its response. The Partnership may be entitled to receive additional amounts from the plaintiff as reimbursement of legal fees and expenses incurred to defend against the claims. In December 2017, the Partnership received approximately $29.8 million from the plaintiff as a deposit towards its obligations to reimburse the Partnership for such expenses, but such amount is subject to repayment pending a final determination of the correct reimbursement amount and the ultimate outcome of the appeal process.
Cobalt International Energy, Inc. ("Cobalt") was a portfolio company owned by two of our Legacy Energy funds and funds advised by certain other private equity sponsors.  Cobalt filed for bankruptcy protection on December 14, 2017.  A federal securities class action against Cobalt (In re Cobalt International Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation) was filed in November 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, seeking monetary damages and alleging that Cobalt and its directors made misrepresentations in certain of Cobalt’s securities offering filings relating to:  (i) the value of oil reserves in Angola for which Cobalt had acquired drilling concessions, and (ii) its compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act regarding its operations in Angola and a U.S. government investigation regarding the same.  The securities class action also named as co-defendants certain securities underwriters and the five private equity sponsors of Cobalt, including Riverstone and the Partnership.  The class action alleged that the Partnership has liability as a "control person" for the alleged misrepresentations in Cobalt's securities offerings as well as insider trading liability.  The federal court dismissed the insider trading claim against the Partnership.  In addition to the class action in federal court, a class action claim was also filed in Texas state court in Houston (Ira Gaines v. Joseph Bryant, et al.) on similar grounds, alleging derivative claims that Cobalt and the private equity sponsors breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in insider trading. No Partnership employee served as a director or executive of Cobalt, and we vigorously contest all allegations made against the Partnership. 
From 2007 to 2009, a Luxembourg subsidiary of CEREP I, a real estate fund, received proceeds from the sale of real estate located in Paris, France. Based on a provision in the Luxembourg-France tax treaty, it did not report or pay tax in France on gain from the sale. The French tax authorities asserted that CEREP I was ineligible to claim exemptions from French tax under the tax treaty, and issued a tax assessment seeking to collect taxes, interest and penalties. In April 2015, the French tax court issued an opinion in this matter that was adverse to CEREP I, holding the Luxembourg property company liable for approximately €105 million (including interest accrued since the beginning of the tax dispute). CEREP I paid approximately €30 million of the tax obligations and the Partnership paid the remaining approximately €75 million in its capacity as a guarantor. The Partnership disagreed with the outcome and filed a petition of appeal. In December 2017, the Partnership was successful on its appeal, with the French appellate court reversing the earlier tax court opinion and awarding the Partnership a refund of the full €105 million of tax and penalties (inclusive of amounts paid by CEREP I) and awarding interest on the refund

87






(which is estimated to be approximately €12.5 million, before tax). The appellate decision remains subject to the possibility of a further appeal, but the French tax authorities have not given notice as to whether they will pursue such a further appeal. Pending receipt of the refund and a final determination on any further appeal, the Partnership has not recognized income in respect of the refund as of December 31, 2017.
The Partnership currently is and expects to continue to be, from time to time, subject to examinations, formal and informal inquiries and investigations by various U.S. and non-U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, including but not limited to, the SEC, Department of Justice, state attorneys general, FINRA, National Futures Association and the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority. The Partnership routinely cooperates with such examinations, inquiries and investigations, and they may result in the commencement of civil, criminal, or administrative or other proceedings against the Partnership or its personnel. For example, among various other requests for information, the SEC has requested information about: (i) the Partnership's historical practices relating to the acceleration of monitoring fees received from certain of the Partnership's funds' portfolio companies, and (ii) the Partnership's relationship with a third-party investment adviser to a registered investment company that has invested in various investment funds sponsored by the Partnership. The Partnership is cooperating fully with the SEC's inquiries.
During the year, the Partnership entered into settlement and purchase agreements with investors in a hedge fund and two structured finance vehicles managed by Vermillion related to investments of approximately $400 million in petroleum commodities that the Partnership believes were misappropriated by third parties outside the U.S. In total, the Partnership paid $265 million ($165 million of which was paid in 2017 with the remaining $100 million paid in 2016) to fully resolve all claims related to these matters and issued promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $54 million to repurchase the investors' interests in the two structured finance vehicles. In connection with these settlements, the Partnership also acquired certain rights to receive a portion of any proceeds obtained from marine cargo insurance policies and other efforts to pursue reimbursement for the misappropriation of petroleum. In the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership recognized $177 million, net of related recovery costs, in general liability insurance proceeds related to these settlements.
It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of all pending investigations and legal proceedings and employment-related matters, and some of the matters discussed above involve claims for potentially large and/or indeterminate amounts of damages. Based on information known by management, management does not believe that as of the datePart II, Item 8 of this filing the final resolutionsAnnual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the matters above will have a material effect upon the Partnership's consolidated financial statements. However, given the potentially large and/or indeterminate amounts of damages sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of investigations and litigations, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material effect on the Partnership's financial results in any particular period.matters.
The Partnership accrues an estimated loss contingency liability when it is probable that such a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2017, the Partnership had recorded liabilities aggregating to $35 million for litigation-related contingencies, regulatory examinations and inquiries, and other matters. The Partnership evaluates its outstanding legal and regulatory proceedings and other matters each quarter to assess its loss contingency accruals, and makes adjustments in such accruals, upwards or downward, as appropriate, based on management's best judgment after consultation with counsel. There is no assurance that the Partnership's accruals for loss contingencies will not need to be adjusted in the future or that, in light of the uncertainties involved in such matters, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the accruals that the Partnership has recorded.
ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.

PART II.


ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS         AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common units representing limited partner interests in The Carlyle Group L.P. arestock is traded on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “CG.” Our common units began trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market Exchange on May 3, 2012.
The number of holders of record of our common unitsstock as of February 9, 20188, 2023 was 28.12. This does not include the number of unitholdersstockholders that hold shares in “street name” through banks or broker-dealers.

8899







    Dividend Policy
Cash Distribution PolicyUnder our dividend policy for Common Units
It is Carlyle’s intention to cause Carlyle Holdings to make quarterly distributions to its partners, including The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries, that will enable The Carlyle Group L.P.our common stock, we expect to pay our common stockholders an annualized dividend of $1.30 per share of common stock, equal to a quarterly distributiondividend of approximately 75%$0.325 per share of Distributable Earnings Attributablecommon stock. In February 2023, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the anticipated common stock dividend to Common Unitholdersan annual rate of $1.40 per common share ($0.35 per common share on a quarterly basis), anticipated to commence for the quarter. “Distributable Earnings Attributable to Common Unitholders” refers to The Carlyle Group L.P.'s share of Distributable Earnings, after an implied provision for current corporate income taxes (other than corporate income taxes attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.) and preferred unit distributions, net of corporate income taxes attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. and amounts payable under the tax receivable agreement. Carlyle’s general partner may adjust the distribution for amounts determinedfirst quarter 2023 dividend anticipated to be necessary or appropriate to provide for the conduct of its business, to make appropriate investmentspaid in its business and its funds or to comply with applicable law or any of its financing agreements, or to provide for future cash requirements such as tax-related payments, giveback obligations and distributions to unitholders for any ensuing quarter. The amount to be distributed could also be adjusted upward in any one quarter.May 2023.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, theThe declaration and payment of any distributions will be atdividends to holders of our common stock are subject to the sole discretion of our general partner,Board of Directors, which may change our distributiondividend policy at any time. Our general partner will take into account general economictime or from time to time, and business conditions, our strategic plans and prospects, our business and investment opportunities, our financial condition and operating results, working capital requirements and anticipated cash needs, contractual restrictions and obligations, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, other constraints on the payment of distributions by us to our common unitholders or by our subsidiaries to us, and such other factors as our general partner may deem relevant.
Because The Carlyle Group L.P. is a holding partnership and has no material assets other than its ownership of partnership units in Carlyle Holdings held through wholly owned subsidiaries, we will fund distributions by The Carlyle Group L.P. to common unitholders, if any, in three steps:
first, we will cause Carlyle Holdings to make distributions to its partners, including The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries. If Carlyle Holdings makes such distributions, the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings will be entitled to receive equivalent distributions pro rata based on their partnership interests in Carlyle Holdings;

second, we will cause The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries to distribute to The Carlyle Group L.P. their share of such distributions, net of taxes and amounts payable under the tax receivable agreement by such wholly owned subsidiaries; and

third, The Carlyle Group L.P. will distribute its net share of such distributions to our common unitholders on a pro rata basis.
Because our wholly owned subsidiaries must pay taxes and make payments under the tax receivable agreement, the amounts ultimately distributed by us to our common unitholders are expected to be less, on a per unit basis, than the amounts distributed by the Carlyle Holdings partnerships to the other limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships in respect of their Carlyle Holdings partnership units.
In addition, the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships will provide for cash distributions, which we refer to as “tax distributions,” to the partners of such partnerships if the wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P. which are the general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships determine that the taxable income of the relevant partnership will give rise to taxable income for its partners. Generally, these tax distributions will be computed based on our estimate of the net taxable income of the relevant partnership allocable to a partner multiplied by an assumed tax rate equal to the highest effective marginal combined U.S. federal, state and local income tax rate prescribed for an individual or corporate resident in New York, New York (taking into account the non-deductibility of certain expenses and the character of our income). The Carlyle Holdings partnerships will make tax distributions only to the extent distributions from such partnerships for the relevant year were otherwise insufficient to cover such tax liabilities. The Carlyle Group L.P. is not required to distribute to its common unitholders any of the cash that its wholly owned subsidiaries may receive as a result of tax distributions by the Carlyle Holdings partnerships.
Under the Delaware Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to a partner if after the distribution all our liabilities, other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specific property of the partnership, would exceed the fair value of our assets. If we were to make such an impermissible distribution, any limited partner who received a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution was in violation of the Delaware Limited Partnership Act would be liable to us for the amount of the distribution

89






for three years. In addition, the terms of our credit facility provide certain limitscertificate of incorporation. There can be no assurance that dividends will be made as intended or at all or that any particular dividend policy will be maintained.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph depicts the total return to holders of our common stock from the closing price on our ability to make distributions. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Preferred Unit Distributions
With respect to distribution yearDecember 29, 2017, the Board of Directorslast trading day of our general partner has declared a distribution2017 fiscal year, through December 30, 2022, the last trading day of our 2022 fiscal year, relative to preferred unitholders totaling approximately $6.0 million, or $0.375347 per Preferred Unit, which was paidthe performance of the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Asset Managers Index. The graph assumes $100 invested on December 15, 2017.29, 2017 and dividends received reinvested in the security or index.
The performance graph is not intended to be indicative of future performance. The performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
cg-20221231_g1.jpg
100


    Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2022 for the periods indicated:
Period(a) Total number of shares
purchased
(b) Average price paid per share(c) Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs(d) Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
(Dollars in millions, except unit and per unit data)
October 1, 2022 to October 31, 2022 (1)— $— — $253.1 
November 1, 2022 to November 30, 2022 (1)(2)552,497 $29.07 552,497 $237.0 
December 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 (1)(2)754,170 $30.12 754,170 $214.3 
Total1,306,667 1,306,667 

(1)    In February 2018,October 2021, the Board of Directors of the general partnerCompany authorized the repurchase of the Partnership declaredup to $400 million of common stock effective January 1, 2022. The timing and actual number of shares of common stock repurchased will depend on a distribution for the first quartervariety of 2018 of $0.367188 per preferred unit to preferred unitholders of recordfactors, including legal requirements, price and economic and market conditions. The share repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at the close of business on March 1, 2018, payable on March 15, 2018. Distributions on the Preferred Units are discretionaryany time and non-cumulative.
Common Unit Distributions
With respect to distribution year 2017,does not have a specified expiration date. In February 2023, the Board of Directors replenished the repurchase program and expanded the limit to $500 million of our general partner has declared cumulative distributions to common unitholders totaling approximately $137.5 million, or $1.41 per common unit, consisting of (i) $0.33 per common unitstock in respectaggregate effective March 31, 2023, which is not reflected in the table above.
(2)All of the fourth quartershares of common stock purchased during this period were purchased in open market and brokered transactions and were subsequently retired.

    Sales of Unregistered Securities
In March of 2017, which is payablewe amended our agreement with NGP Management. Pursuant to the amended agreement, we agreed, among other things, to issue additional shares of common stock on each of February 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, with a value of $10.0 million per year to an affiliate of NGP Management. For each year thereafter, we agreed to issue additional shares of common stock on February 27, 20181 in an amount based on total distributions received by the Company from NGP Management, in any case not to common unitholdersexceed $10.0 million per year.
In order to effectuate the amended NGP agreement, we entered into agreements with an affiliate of recordNGP Management on February 20, 2018, (ii) $0.56 per common unit in respecteach of the third quarter of 2017, which was paiddates below to deliver such shares as follows:
Shares of Common Stock Delivered / Deliverable in August,
20192020202120222023202420252026
Date of Agreement:
February 1, 2018160,211120,158120,159
February 1, 2019219,189164,391164,393
February 1, 2020119,76089,82189,820
February 1, 2021116,55987,41987,418
February 1, 202275,29056,46756,467
February 1, 2023103,43277,57477,573
Such securities have been offered and sold in November 2017, (iii) $0.42 per common unitreliance on the exemption contained in respectSection 4(a)(2) of the second quarter of 2017, which was paidSecurities Act as a transaction by the issuer not involving a public offering. No general solicitation or underwriters were involved in August 2017,such offer and (iv) $0.10 per common unit in respect of the first quarter of 2017, which was paid in May 2017. Distributions to common unitholders paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2017 were $118.1 million, representing the distributions paid in February 2017 of $0.16 per common unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2016, $0.10 per common unit with respect to the first quarter of 2017, $0.42 per common unit with respect to the second quarter of 2017, and $0.56 per common unit with respect to the third quarter of 2017.sale.
With respect to distribution year 2016, the Board of Directors of our general partner has declared cumulative distributions to common unitholders totaling approximately $131.1 million, or $1.55 per common unit, consisting of (i) $0.16 per common unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2016, which was paid in February 2017, (ii) $0.50 per common unit in respect of the third quarter of 2016, which was paid in November 2016, (iii) $0.63 per common unit in respect of the second quarter of 2016, which was paid in August 2016, and (iv) $0.26 per common unit in respect of the first quarter of 2016, which was paid in May 2016. Distributions to common unitholders paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2016 were $140.9 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2016 of $0.29 per common unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2015, $0.26 per common unit with respect to the first quarter of 2016, $0.63 per common unit with respect to the second quarter of 2016, and $0.50 per common unit with respect to the third quarter of 2016.
With respect to distribution year 2015, the Board of Directors of our general partner has declared cumulative distributions to common unitholders totaling approximately $163.7 million, or $2.07 per common unit, consisting of (i) $0.29 per common unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2015, which was paid in March 2016, (ii) $0.56 per common unit in respect of the third quarter of 2015, which was paid in November 2015, (iii) $0.89 per common unit in respect of the second quarter of 2015, which was paid in August 2015, and (iv) $0.33 per common unit in respect of the first quarter of 2015, which was paid in May 2015. Distributions to common unitholders paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 were $251.0 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2015 of $1.61 per common unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2014, $0.33 per common unit with respect to the first quarter of 2015, $0.89 per common unit with respect to the second quarter of 2015, and $0.56 per common unit with respect to the third quarter of 2015.Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
Carlyle Holdings Unit Distributions
With respect to distribution year 2017, we declared distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings totaling approximately $334.2 million, or $1.41 per Carlyle Holdings unit, consisting of (i) $0.33 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2017, which is payable on February 26, 2018 to Carlyle Holdings unitholders of record on February 20, 2018, (ii) $0.56 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the third quarter of 2017, which was paid in November 2017, (iii) $0.42 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the second quarter of 2017, which was paid in August 2017, and (iv) $0.10 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the first quarter of 2017, which was paid in May 2017.  Distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2017 were $295.6 million, representing the distributions paid in February 2017 of $0.16 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2016, $0.10 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the first quarter of 2017, $0.42 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the second quarter of 2017, and $0.56 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the third quarter of 2017.
With respect to distribution year 2016, we declared distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings totaling approximately $376.2 million, or $1.55 per Carlyle Holdings unit, consisting of (i) $0.16 per Carlyle Holdings unit in

90






respect of the fourth quarter of 2016, which was paid in February 2017, (ii) $0.50 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the third quarter of 2016, which was paid in November 2016, (iii) $0.63 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the second quarter of 2016, which was paid in August 2016, and (iv) $0.26 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the first quarter of 2016, which was paid in May 2016.  Distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2016 were $422.6 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2016 of $0.35 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2015, $0.26 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the first quarter of 2016, $0.63 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the second quarter of 2016, and $0.50 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the third quarter of 2016.
With respect to distribution year 2015, we declared distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings totaling approximately $530.1 million, or $2.17 per Carlyle Holdings unit, consisting of (i) $0.35 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2015, which was paid in March 2016, (ii) $0.60 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the third quarter of 2015, which was paid in November 2015, (iii) $0.89 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the second quarter of 2015, which was paid in August 2015, and (iv) $0.33 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the first quarter of 2015, which was paid in May 2015.  Distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 were $848.5 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2015 of $1.61 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2014, $0.33 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the first quarter of 2015, $0.89 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the second quarter of 2015, and $0.60 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the third quarter of 2015.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per unit of our common units, for the periods indicated:
 Sales Price
 2017 2016
 High Low High Low
First Quarter$17.50
 $15.20
 $17.40
 $11.25
Second Quarter$20.00
 $15.60
 $17.97
 $15.30
Third Quarter$24.70
 $18.85
 $17.44
 $14.82
Fourth Quarter$24.85
 $19.50
 $16.45
 $14.35
As permitted by our policies and procedures governing transactions in our securities by our directors, executive officers and other employees, from time to time some of these persons may establish plans or arrangements complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, and similar plans and arrangements relating to our common stock. Our policy generally provides for a default election by employees to sell shares to cover taxes due upon the vesting of restricted stock units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units.unless

101


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In February 2016, the Board of Directorsemployee elects to pay cash in respect of the general partner oftaxes due upon vesting during the Partnership authorizedopen trading window in the repurchase of upquarter prior to $200 million of common units and/or Carlyle Holdings units. Under this unit repurchase program, units may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. We expect that the majority of repurchases under this program will be done via open market transactions. No units will be repurchased from our executive officers under this program. The timing and actual number of common units and/or Carlyle Holdings units repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements, price, and economic and market conditions. This unit repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expirationvesting date. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, no units were repurchased. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $141 million in remaining authorization under the unit repurchase program.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.


91






ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data presents selected data on the financial condition and results of operations of The Carlyle Group L.P. This financial data should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the historical financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We derived the following selected consolidated financial data of The Carlyle Group L.P. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 from the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of The Carlyle Group L.P. which are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

[RESERVED]
102
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (Dollars in millions, except per unit data)
Statement of Operations Data         
Revenues         
Fund management fees$1,026.9
 $1,076.1
 $1,085.2
 $1,166.3
 $984.6
Total Performance fees2,093.9
 751.8
 824.9
 1,674.4
 2,375.3
Investment income (loss)232.0
 160.5
 15.2
 (7.2) 18.8
Interest and other income and revenues323.4
 285.9
 1,080.9
 1,046.8
 1,062.5
Total Revenues3,676.2
 2,274.3
 3,006.2
 3,880.3
 4,441.2
          
Total Expenses2,632.3
 2,242.1
 3,468.4
 3,775.4
 3,693.9
          
Other Income88.4
 13.1
 864.4
 887.0
 696.7
Income before provision for income taxes1,132.3
 45.3
 402.2
 991.9
 1,444.0
Provision for income taxes124.9
 30.0
 2.1
 76.8
 96.2
Net income1,007.4
 15.3
 400.1
 915.1
 1,347.8
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities72.5
 41.0
 537.9
 485.5
 676.0
Net income (loss) attributable to
Carlyle Holdings
934.9
 (25.7) (137.8) 429.6
 $671.8
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings690.8
 (32.1) (119.4) 343.8
 567.7
Net income (loss) attributable to
The Carlyle Group L.P.
$244.1
 $6.4
 $(18.4) $85.8
 104.1
Net income attributable to Series A Preferred Unitholders6.0
    
Net income (loss) attributable to
The Carlyle Group L.P. Common Unitholders
$238.1
 $6.4
 $(18.4) $85.8
 $104.1
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. per common unit         
Basic$2.58
 $0.08
 $(0.24) $1.35
 $2.24
Diluted$2.38
 $(0.08) $(0.30) $1.23
 $2.05
Distributions declared per common unit$1.24
 $1.68
 $3.39
 $1.88
 $1.33


92







 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (Dollars in millions)
Balance Sheet Data         
Cash and cash equivalents$1,000.1
 $670.9
 $991.5
 $1,242.0
 $966.6
Corporate treasury investments$376.3
 $190.2
 $
 $
 $
Investments and accrued performance fees$5,294.9
 $3,588.1
 $3,874.5
 $4,727.2
 $4,418.9
Investments of Consolidated Funds(1)
$4,534.3
 $3,893.7
 $23,998.8
 $26,028.8
 $26,886.4
Total assets$12,280.6
 $9,973.0
 $32,181.6
 $35,994.3
 $35,622.3
          
Debt obligations$1,573.6
 $1,265.2
 $1,135.7
 $1,146.9
 $940.6
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds$4,303.8
 $3,866.3
 $17,064.7
 $16,052.2
 $15,220.7
Total liabilities$9,331.6
 $8,519.0
 $23,258.1
 $23,138.3
 $20,892.9
          
Redeemable non-controlling interests in consolidated entities$
 $
 $2,845.9
 $3,761.5
 $4,352.0
Series A Preferred Units$387.5
 $
 $
 $
 $
Total partners’ capital$2,949.0
 $1,454.0
 $6,077.6
 $9,094.5
 $10,377.4
(1)
The entities comprising our Consolidated Funds are not the same entities for all periods presented. On January 1, 2016, The Carlyle Group L.P. adopted ASU 2015-2, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which provides a revised consolidation model to use in evaluating whether to consolidate certain types of legal entities. As a result, The Carlyle Group L.P. deconsolidated a majority of its consolidated funds on January 1, 2016. The consolidation or deconsolidation of funds generally has the effect of grossing up or down, respectively, reported assets, liabilities, and cash flows, and has no effect on net income attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. or partners’ capital.


93






ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS      OF OPERATIONS

Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this report to “Carlyle,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to The Carlyle Group L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 18, 2011. The Partnership is a holding partnershipInc. and its sole material assets are equity interests through wholly owned subsidiary entities representing partnership units in Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P. and Carlyle Holdings III L.P. (collectively,” Carlyle Holdings”). Through wholly owned subsidiary entities, the Partnership is the sole general partner of Carlyle Holdings and operates and controls all of the business and affairs of Carlyle Holdings and, through Carlyle Holdings and its subsidiaries, continues to conduct the business now conducted by theseconsolidated subsidiaries. Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. is the general partner of the Partnership.
As the sole general partner of Carlyle Holdings, the Partnership consolidates the financial position and results of operations of Carlyle Holdings into its financial statements, and the ownership interests of the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships are reflected as a non-controlling interest in the Partnership’s financial statements.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We conduct our operations through four reportablethree operating segments: CorporateGlobal Private Equity, Real Assets, Global Credit, (formerly known asand Global Market Strategies), and Investment Solutions.
 
Corporate
Global Private Equity — Our Global Private Equity — Our Corporate Private Equity segment advises our 23 buyout and 10 growth capital funds, which seek a wide variety of investments of different sizes and growth potentials. As of December 31, 2017, our Corporate Private Equity segment had approximately $73 billion in AUM and approximately $36 billion in Fee-earning AUM (Fee-earning AUM excludes $18 billion* in pending AUM for which we have not yet activated fees, although this capital is included in total AUM).

Real Assets — Our Real Assets segment advises our 11buyout and middle market and growth capital funds, our U.S. and internationally focused real estate funds, our two infrastructure funds, our two power funds, our international energy fund, as well as our four Legacy Energy funds (funds that we jointly advise with Riverstone). Theand natural resources funds. We also include the NGP Carry Funds in this segment, also includes five NGP management fee fundswhich are managed and four carry funds advised by NGP. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our Real AssetsGlobal Private Equity segment had approximately $43$163.1 billion in AUM and approximately $32$107.8 billion in Fee-earning AUM.


Global Credit — Our Global Credit segment advises a group of 58 fundsproducts that pursue investment opportunities acrossstrategies including loans and structured credit, direct lending, distressedopportunistic credit, energy creditaircraft finance, infrastructure debt, insurance solutions and opportunistic credit.global capital markets. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our Global Credit segment had approximately $33$146.3 billion in AUM and approximately $27$121.2 billion in Fee-earning AUM.


Global Investment Solutions — Our Global Investment Solutions segment advises global private equity and real estate fund of funds programs and related co-investment and secondary activities across 197 fund vehicles.activities. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our Global Investment Solutions segment had approximately $46$63.3 billion in AUM and approximately $30$37.5 billion in Fee-earning AUM.
*For the Partnership, Fee-earning AUM excludes $22 billion in pending AUM for which we have not yet activated fees, although this capital is included in total AUM.
We earn management fees pursuant to contractual arrangements with the investment funds that we manage and fees for transaction advisory and oversight services provided to portfolio companies of these funds. We also typically receive a performance fee from an investment fund, which may be either an incentive fee or a special residual allocation of income, which we refer to as a performance allocation, or carried interest, in the event that specified investment returns are achieved by the fund. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), we are required to consolidate some of the investment funds that we advise. However, for segment reporting purposes, we present revenues and expenses on a basis that deconsolidates these investment funds. Accordingly, our segment revenues primarily consist of fund management fees and related transaction and portfolio advisory fees and other income, realized performance feesrevenues (consisting of incentive fees and carried interestperformance allocations), realized principal investment income, including realized and unrealized gains on our investments in our funds and other trading securities, as well as interest and other income. Our segment expenses primarily consist of cash compensation and benefits expenses, including salaries, bonuses, and realized performance payment arrangements, and equity-based compensation excluding awards granted in our initial public offering or in connection with

94






acquisitions and strategic investments, and general and administrative expenses. While our segment expenses include depreciation and interest expense, our segment expenses exclude acquisition-relatedacquisition and disposition related charges and amortization of intangibles and impairment. Refer to Note 1617 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the differences between our financial results reported pursuant to U.S. GAAP and our financial results for segment reporting purposes.

103


Trends Affecting our Business
ExpectationsThe year 2022 was characterized by high inflation, significant market volatility, rapidly tightening financial conditions, a surge in the U.S. dollar against most currencies, and weakening fundamentals across the globe. By the end of 2022, U.S. consumption, investment and manufacturing all showed signs of slowing growth. While fourth quarter 2022 U.S. GDP growth surprised to the upside at a 2.9% quarter-over-quarter annualized rate, expanding inventories and declining imports accounted for globalnearly 70% of the headline growth. Experiences and services spending stood out as bright spots as the year progressed, with hotel stays and domestic air travel rising above pre-pandemic averages as consumers shifted spending habits away from the pandemic-driven durable goods boom of 2020 and 2021. Residential construction activity and investment declined rapidly in the latter half of 2022 due to a rapid increase in average mortgage rates and related collapse in home construction and purchasing activity. After peaking at 9.1% in June 2022, consumer prices rose 6.5% in December 2022 from a year earlier; core prices, which exclude food and energy, rose 5.7% in December, a decline from a September peak of 6.3%. Faster than expected deceleration in inflation readings has increased market optimism over the past month that the Federal Reserve will not raise interest rates to as high a level as previously anticipated. However, the dramatic increase in financing costs over the past year for many companies could result in reduced spending, hiring, and capital expenditures over the next several months, introducing risks to the near-term economic outlook.
Europe’s GDP growth in 2022 surprised to the upside, with current estimates anticipating greater than 3% growth for the year. Price cap schemes, generous fiscal subsidies, and a mild winter all contributed to a smaller-than-expected impact of the energy crisis resulting from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. After surging over the summer to oil price equivalents in excess of $1,000 per barrel, forward wholesale electricity prices have moderated back towards levels seen at the end of 2021 in response to policy actions by the European Commission. Household consumption and consumer confidence have remained strong throughresilient as a result, with our portfolio data indicating steady improvement in spending patterns throughout the fourth quarter of 20172022. Going forward, the industrial sector remains most vulnerable to the ongoing energy crisis. Industrial production costs have increased by 40% over the year and into early 2018,more than 200% for certain gas-intensive industrial processes. Beyond energy, certain economies with particular optimism surroundingvery high household debt levels, such as the outlookUnited Kingdom and Sweden, also face rising risks as mortgage rates reset and depress disposable income.
While Europe’s energy subsidies have softened the blow of the ongoing energy crisis to domestic consumers and businesses, the effect is to bid away already scarce natural gas from other net energy importers, many of which are emerging market economies that cannot compete on price. The IMF forecasts that there will be between 20 and 30 sovereign defaults in 2023 and 2024 and that 1.7 billion people are at risk of food insecurity. The triple threat of expensive and scarce energy supplies and food shortages pose a significant challenge to many emerging market economies around the globe, which in turn increases the risk of political and social unrest.
For much of Asia, 2022 was a year of below-trend growth due to high prices, particularly for food and fuel, slowing global demand for goods, and spillover effects from slower growth in China. In Japan, lingering COVID-19 related restrictions, wages that lagged broader inflation, and volatile industrial output hindered growth, and overall GDP remains below pre-pandemic peaks in real terms. In Korea, economic growth slowed throughout the eurozone. Our proprietary portfolio of industrialyear as export demand fell and manufacturing related indicators remained steady at or near six-year highs during the fourth quarterhigh prices sapped consumer confidence. India was a bright spot in 2022, with robust growth in domestic consumption and into early 2018. As 2017 drew to a close, inflation continued to fall short of central bank targets. In the U.S., the core PCE price index (the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of core inflation) rose by 1.5% in the twelve months ended December 2017, unchanged from November and still well below the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Our proprietary portfolio data similarly lacked signs of inflationary pressure, a phenomenon we believe is almost entirely driven by weakness in construction activity. During the fourth quarter of 2017, eurozone core inflation rose more sluggishly than in the third quarter of 2017, with year-on-year rates of 0.9% observed in each month of the fourth quarter. On the other hand, U.S. bond market inflation expectations continue to rise, as the 10-year breakeven rate recently reached 2.1%. The U.S. dollar declined nearly 10% against global currencies in 2017, the largest annual decline in more than 10-years. During 2017, the Euro appreciated 12% against the U.S. dollar.

Stronger real global growth, relatively low longer-term interest rates, and the passage of tax reform pushed global equity markets to record highs in 2017. The MSCI World Index advanced 20% in 2017 and 5% in the fourth quarter alone, while the S&P 500 rose 19% over the calendar year and 6%fixed investment. China’s economy was flat in the fourth quarter of 2017. Underlying earnings2022 compared to the third quarter, a better-than-expected outcome given disruption experienced as a result of the rapid rollback in COVID-19 restrictions and subsequent surge in cases. Overall, China’s economy, hampered by rolling COVID-19 related restrictions and broad lockdowns, grew 3% in 2022, well below its long-term trend. However, the recent rapid rollback of COVID-19 related restrictions has introduced significant optimism that growth atwill rebound strongly in 2023. Preliminary data on foot traffic in our portfolio retail locations and cargo throughput volumes indicate an acceleration in activity in January 2023. While China’s growth outlook has improved, the companies comprisingrelationship between China and the U.S. remains strained, and tensions between China and Taiwan continue to mount, raising risks of further global economic volatility given the connection between the China and U.S. economies.
Revenues for S&P 500 has supportedconstituents are estimated to have grown 10.5% in 2022, a reflection of companies’ ability to push through higher prices. This topline growth momentum did slow throughout the upward movementyear; however, for Q4 2022, revenues are estimated to have grown just 4% vs. year-ago levels. Estimates of the markets. Estimated total 2017S&P 500 constituents’ earnings growth for the S&P 500 is 13.4%, the highest annual rate since 2011. As has been the case2022 were steadily marked down throughout the year, companies with greater global exposure have been driving this trend. Asand currently stand at 4.4% in 2022. Notably, estimates anticipate that earnings contracted by 5.0% in Q4 2022 versus the same period a year ago, the worst decline since Q3 2020 during the midst of mid-December 2017, S&P 500 companies with a concentrationthe pandemic. Seven of at least 50% of sales outside the U.S. experiencedeleven sectors estimate year-over-year earnings growth of approximately 15%, compared to approximately 7% for companies with a greater domestic focus. After strong recent performance pushing global market multiples to multi-year highs, during early February 2018, the markets experienced a heightened level of volatility in connection with a sell-off.

The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield ended 2017 at around 2.4% and has risen to more than 2.8% in the first two weeks of February 2018. While the yield curve continued to flatten through most of January, it has recently shown signs of steepening, with the credit spread between the 10-year and two-year Treasury yields rising to nearly 0.7% as of February 7, 2018. Credit spreads on B-rated corporate credit ticked up slightly to 370 basis pointsdeclines in the fourth quarter - well below long-run averages - whileof 2022, led by materials, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The estimated blended net profit margin is 11.4% for Q4 2022, down from 12.4% a year ago, as earnings growth lagged topline growth in 2022. The productivity gains that companies enjoyed in 2020 and 2021 on the trailing high-yield defaultback of large investments in digitization and technology faded in 2022; instead, a persistently tight labor market, faster wage gains, and higher input prices slowed real output growth.
104


Equity markets experienced significant volatility throughout 2022 as developed markets saw the highest rates of inflation in 40+ years, monetary policy shifted rapidly from accommodative to hawkish, and geopolitical developments introduced new growth fears. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate continuedby a cumulative total of 450 bps since March 2022, and has indicated that more hikes are forthcoming, albeit at a somewhat slower pace. Futures markets have been volatile in 2023, but currently price in an additional 50 bps in rate increases by June 2023. The Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq 100 fell 8.8%, 19.4 %, and 33%, respectively, from December 31, 2021 to hover around 2.3% (measured globally)December 30, 2022. Globally, the MSCI ACWI, EuroStoxx 600 and Shanghai Composite fell 19.8%, 12.9%, and 15.1%, respectively, over the same period.
Obtaining financing in both the high yield bond market and the leveraged loan market is currently challenging. In 2022, global bond funds experienced over $375 billion in outflows. Financing has become increasingly expensive due to both the rise in base rates (SOFR rose 425 bps over the course of the year) and wider spreads (B-rated option-adjusted spreads rose 265 bps from December 2021 to December 2022). Sustained lowLeveraged loans, which are floating rate and thus typically more appealing to investors when interest rates are rising, have sold off to a lesser extent, but financing and transaction volumes have been under pressure. U.S. leveraged loan issuance fell 55% in 2022 versus 2021, while global M&A volumes totaled $3.8 trillion in 2022, a 36% decline from 2021. IPO proceeds, which boomed in 2021, fell 69% globally and 93% in the availabilityU.S. market in 2022, where IPOs raised just $24 billion, the lowest amount since 1990. As capital markets activity slows, we may experience a corresponding reduction in the capital markets fees we earn in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance and placement of financingdebt and equity securities. Our announced new investment and realization activity has continuedbeen slower, and we therefore expect a slow start to support valuation multiples near all-time highs, though rising inflation expectations2023 for both deployments and realizations. As a result, we expect that transaction fee revenue, realized performance fee revenue and realized investment income will likely be lower over the repricing of risk may slownext quarter or two. Our activity could increase as we move throughout the pace of gains.

year as industry levels improve over the coming months.
Our overall carry fund portfolio continued to reflect the impact of the broader macroeconomic environment in the fourth quarter. Within our Global Private Equity segment, our corporate private equity funds appreciated by 5%1% in the fourth quarter and 6% for the year, and our real estate funds depreciated 1% during the fourth quarter but appreciated 16% for the year. Our natural resources and was up 20% for 2017. Ininfrastructure funds appreciated by 2% in the fourth quarter our Corporate Private Equity funds appreciated by 8% (32%and 48% for the full year), our Real Asset funds appreciated by 4% (19% for the full year) andyear. In our Global Credit segment, our carry funds (which represent approximately 11% of the total Global Credit remaining fair value) appreciated by 1%2% in the fourth quarter and 3% for the quarter (11% for the full year). Appreciation inyear. Global Investment Solutions wasfunds depreciated 3% in the fourth quarter and 10%but appreciated 6% for the full-year, negatively impacted byyear; however excluding the strengthimpact of foreign currency translation of the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar as AlpInvestUSD-denominated investments in our EUR-based funds, are primarily denominatedGlobal Investment Solutions would have been flat in Euros, with significant underlying USD-denominated investments. Our private carry fund portfolio appreciated by 6% and our public carry fund portfolio appreciated by 9% during the fourth quarter, each excluding Investment Solutions. The continued appreciation across our portfolio was aided by market tailwinds in 2017 as described above. However, with market valuation levels at all-time highs, increasing volatility and the potential for upward movement in interest rates, it will be difficult for the public markets to generate the same level of appreciation in 2018 as observed in 2017 and, accordingly, it will be difficult for our portfolio to do the same as well.
In December 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "TCJA"), providing the most comprehensive overhaul of the U.S. federal tax code in decades. In general, the TCJA is a pro-growth, pro-business package that is designed to stimulate growth in the economy. We expect the TCJA to further support the recent strong growth in the U.S. and global economies. Although for the majority of our current portfolio companies, we expect the benefit of a lower corporate tax rate will outweigh the cost associated with the potential limitations on interest expense deductibility, we will continue to evaluate the provisions of the Act for any further potential impact. Most of our portfolio companies have reasonable capital structures, are growing earnings and benefit from low interest rates. Assuming we continue to create value and the economy remains strong, we anticipate the TCJA generally should be a net positive for our carry fund portfolio.

95







Private equity fundraising in 2017 hit a record $453 billion, more than 9.5% above the prior high of $414 billion set in 2007, raising total industry “dry powder” above $1 trillion. We raised approximately $25 billion and $43 billion of new capital, respectively, during the fourth quarter, and full-year 2017. As ofexperienced 4% appreciation for the end of 2017, we had raised 57%year. The valuations of our $100primary and secondary funds of funds generally reflect investment fair values on a one-quarter lag.
Our non-carry fund Global Credit products continue to perform well. Dividend yields on our business development companies as of December 31, 2022 were approximately 10%, and approximately 10% for our retail credit product (CTAC). In our liquid credit strategy, our global CLO portfolio continues to experience a default rate less than the industry average, and we are actively managing our credit positions to maintain balanced risk-adjusted credit quality. While default rates have remained low, we expect to see them increase in 2023 as inflation, higher financing costs and the threat of global recession continue to pressure borrower debt-service capacity.
We generated $8.6 billion fundraising target. Wein realized proceeds from our carry funds in the fourth quarter and $33.8 billion for the year; however, we expect that our strongas market conditions remain challenging, the pace of fundraisingrealizations will continue into 2018 and anticipate that we will raise approximately $25 billion during the year. Higher fundraising activity generates incremental expenses, generallyslow in the quarter that the capital is raised. As the majority of new capital commitments will not generate fees until management fees are activated, we generally incur costs ahead of revenues. We expect management feesnear term. Our net accrued performance revenues on several of our new large buyout funds will activate fees in the second half of 2018,balance sheet remained high at which time we expect Fee-Earning AUM and Fee Related Earnings to increase. Pending Fee-Earning AUM, which is capital that we have raised, but on which we have not yet activated fees, was $22$4.0 billion at December 31, 20172022, up from $5 billion at September 30, 2017, primarily due to large closings on our Asia and U.S. Buyout funds.2% since December 31, 2021.

We remain confident in our ability to find investment opportunities that meet the criteria and strategic focus of our investment funds despite higher asset valuations and competition that may put downward pressure on rates of return for new investments across all asset classes. During the fourth quarter, our carry funds invested $7$6.8 billion in new or follow-on transactions and we invested $22a record $34.8 billion for the full year 2022. Deal activity in 2017. Our diverse fund mandates, geographical footprintprivate equity has retreated to pre-pandemic levels from the record level pace in 2021, and experienced investment teams combine to generate a high level of investment lead generation. With $70 billion in available capital ready to deploy, our global investment teamswhile we continue to pursuesee a pipeline of smaller transactions across our platform. We generated $8 billion in realized proceeds in our carry fundsthat require less debt at closing, we believe that larger deals will be slower to occur. However, as the environment for traditional credit issuance remains challenging, we expect that demand for private credit will remain robust, resulting in the fourth quarter and $26 billionpotential for strong deployment in 2017, the sixth consecutive year we realized more than $25 billion in realized proceeds for our fund investors. We are at a point in the cycle for our carry funds where the prior generation of funds have exited substantial parts of their portfolios and newer funds, while in accrued carry, are not yet producing realized performance fees. We expect to remain in this position through 2018, and therefore expect net realized performance fees will likely be lower in 2018 than 2017.

In January 2018, we re-branded our “Global Market Strategies” segment to “Global Credit” to better reflect the underlying business strategy. During 2018, we plan to invest our resources in further expanding and supporting our Global Credit business.segment.
During 2022, we raised $29.9 billion in new capital, which included $2.0 billion in additional third-party capital raised for our strategic investment in Fortitude, fundraising on our CLO platform and in CTAC, and the launch of our third Credit Opportunities fund within our Global Credit segment, as well as fundraising for our Global Private Equity and Global Investment Solutions funds. We anticipate the fundraising landscape to continue to be competitive as limited partners are closely managing their portfolio allocation targets in light of market volatility and their liquidity requirements. As a result, fundraising in certain products - particularly in corporate private equity strategies - may take longer to complete and fund sizes may not meet levels that they otherwise would in a more favorable market environment. Slowdowns in fundraising may also
105


delay catch-up management fees that would be charged to fund investors in subsequent closings and smaller fund sizes could result in lower management fees in the future.
The SEC has put forth several rule proposals in recent months, and we are continuing to evaluate the potential impacts to our business and operations and those of our portfolio companies. These proposals include, among others: (i) new reporting requirements of material cybersecurity incidents and periodic reporting regarding a company’s cybersecurity risk programs, (ii) new rules and amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that expand compliance obligations and prohibit certain activities for private fund advisors, and (iii) extensive climate change disclosure regulations. We are buildingalso closely evaluating potential impacts to our business of financial, regulatory and other proposals put forth by the current Administration and Congress as well as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which was signed into law in August. The potential for policy changes may create regulatory uncertainty for our investment strategies and our portfolio companies and could adversely affect our profitability and the profitability of our portfolio companies.
Recent Developments and Transactions
CEO Appointment
On February 6, 2023, we announced that our Board of Directors has appointed Harvey M. Schwartz as our Chief Executive Officer and a scalable foundationmember of our Board of Directors, effective February 15, 2023 (the “Commencement Date”). On the Commencement Date, Mr. Schwartz will receive inducement equity awards with a combined grant date value of $180 million, of which $108 million will be granted in the form of performance-based restricted stock units which will be eligible to vest in five equal tranches and $72 million will be granted in the form of time-based restricted stock units which will be eligible to vest ratably in four equal installments. The number of shares of common stock underlying the performance-based award will be determined by dividing the $108 million grant value by the per share accounting fair value on the Commencement Date. As we anticipate that the accounting fair value on the Commencement Date will be less than the per share closing stock price on the Commencement Date, we expect that the total face value of the performance award (i.e., the number of shares multiplied by the closing price on the Commencement Date) will be greater than $108 million. The number of shares of common stock underlying the time-based award will be determined by dividing the $72 million grant value by the per share closing stock price on the Commencement Date.
Recent Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company completed several transactions with the objective of driving accretive growth on an inorganic basis as outlined below.
Acquisition of CLO Management Contracts from CBAM Partners LLC
In March 2022, we acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”). The purchase price of $812.9 million consisted of a combination of $618.4 million in cash, approximately 4.2 million newly issued, fully vested common shares ($194.5 million based on the value of the shares at closing), and approximately $3.4 million of acquisition costs incurred by us in connection with the transaction. The portfolio of $15 billion in assets under management was integrated into our Global Credit capableplatform. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the acquisition.
Fortitude Capital Raise and Strategic Advisory Services Agreement
In March 2022, we raised $2.0 billion in third-party equity capital for Fortitude, and committed up to $100 million in additional capital to Carlyle FRL from our balance sheet. In May 2022, Fortitude called $1.1 billion of supportingthe capital raise, with the remaining capital expected to be called in 2023. In connection with the capital raise and subsequent funding, our existing operations and managingindirect ownership of Fortitude decreased from 19.9% to 13.5%. As a higher-levelresult of assetsthis dilution, we recorded a reduction in their current strategies, while also enabling us to extend into adjacent strategies to meet the evolving needscarrying value of our investors. If we successfully execute onequity method investment and corresponding loss of $176.9 million in our business plans,U.S. GAAP results. At the time the remaining capital is called by Fortitude, our indirect ownership will further decrease to 10.5% and we expect to grow AUMrecord an additional reduction in the Global Credit segmentcarrying value of our equity method investment and improvecorresponding loss of approximately $121 million based on the carrying value of $646.0 million as of December 31, 2022, subject to change based on the timing of the dilution and changes in the carrying value of our investment.
On April 1, 2022, we entered into a new strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude through a newly-formed investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C. (“CISM”). Under the agreement,
106


CISM provides Fortitude with certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability. Third party investors who participated in the March 2022 capital raise also made a minority investment in CISM, which is reflected as a non-controlling interest in consolidated entities in the condensed consolidated financial resultsstatements. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the strategic investment in Fortitude.
Acquisition of Abingworth
On August 1, 2022, we acquired Abingworth, a life sciences investment firm, to expand our healthcare investment platform with the addition of nearly $2 billion in assets under management and a specialized team of over 20 investment professionals and advisors. Consideration for Abingworth included a base purchase price of $186.2 million, of which $25.0 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the next few years.Company’s common stock, as well as up to a further $130 million in future incentive payments based on the achievement of certain performance targets. The acquisition included the rights to 15% of performance revenues generated by Abingworth’s two most recent active investment funds, Abingworth Bioventures 8 LP and Abingworth Clinical Co-Development Fund 2 LP. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the acquisition.

Recent Transactions
DistributionsDividends
In February 2018,2023, the Board of Directors of our general partner declared a quarterly distributiondividend of $0.33$0.325 per common unitshare to common unitholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2018,22, 2023, payable on March 1, 2023.
In February 27, 2018.
The2023, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the anticipated common stock dividend to an annual rate of our general partner declared$1.40 per share ($0.35 per common share on a quarterly distribution of $0.367188 per Preferred Unitbasis), anticipated to holders of record atcommence for the close of business on March 1, 2018, payable on March 15, 2018. Distributions on the Preferred Units are discretionary and non-cumulative. See Note 14first quarter 2023 dividend, which is anticipated to the consolidated financial statements for more information on these units.be paid in May 2023.

Key Financial Measures
Our key financial measures are discussed in the following pages. Additional information regarding these key financial measures and our other significant accounting policies can be found in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenues
Revenues primarily consist of fund management fees, performanceincentive fees, investment income including(including performance allocations, realized and unrealized gains of our investments in our funds and other investments,principal investments), as well as interest and other income.
Fund Management Fees. Fund management fees include management fees and transaction and portfolio advisory fees.
We earn management fees for advisory services we provide to funds in which we hold a general partner interest or with which
we have an investment advisory or investment management agreement. Additionally, management fees include catch-up
management fees, which are episodic in nature and represent management fees charged to fund investors in subsequent closings
of a fund which apply to the time period between the fee initiation date and the subsequent closing date.

96






We also earn management fees on our CLOs and other structured products. Collectively, our carry funds and our CLOs and certain other products comprise 78% of our Fee-earning AUM as of December 31, 2022 and approximately 92% of our fund management fees during the year then ended. The balance of our Fee-earning AUM and fund management fees are attributable to our Perpetual Capital products, which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors as investments are realized.
Management fees attributable to Carlyle Partners VI,VIII, L.P. (“CP VI”VIII”), our sixtheighth U.S. buyout fund with approximately $12.0$13.1 billion of Fee-earning AUM as of December 31, 2017, were2022 was approximately 16%10% of fund management fees recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022. Management fees attributable to Carlyle Partners VII, L.P. (“CP VII”), 15%, and 15%our seventh U.S. buyout fund with approximately $15.5 billion of Fee-earning AUM as of December 31, 2022, was 10% of total management fees recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022, and 15% and 17% during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. No other fund generated over 10% of total management fees in the periods presented.
Fund management fees exclude the reimbursement of any partnership expenses paid by the PartnershipCompany on behalf of the Carlyle funds pursuant to the limited partnership agreements, including amounts related to the pursuit of actual, proposed, or
107


unconsummated investments, professional fees, expenses associated with the acquisition, holding and disposition of investments, and other fund administrative expenses.
Transaction and Portfolio Advisory Fees. Transaction and portfolio advisory fees generally include capital markets fees generated by Carlyle Global Capital Markets (“GCM”) in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance and placement of debt and equity securities, and loan syndication for our portfolio companies and third-party clients, which are generally not subject to rebate offsets with respect to our most recent vintages (but are subject to the rebate offsets set forth above for older funds). Underwriting fees include gains, losses and fees arising from securities offerings in which we participate in the underwriter syndicate.
Transaction and portfolio advisory fees also include fees we receive for the transaction and portfolio advisory services we provide to our portfolio companies. When covered by separate contractual agreements, we recognize transaction and portfolio advisory fees for these services when the serviceperformance obligation has been providedsatisfied and collection is reasonably assured. We are required to offset our fund management fees earned by a percentage of thethese transaction and advisory fees earned, which we refer to as the “rebate offsets.offsets,Such rebate offset percentageswhich generally approximaterange from 80% of the fund's portion of the transaction and advisory fees earned. to 100%.
The recognition of portfolio advisory fees, transaction fees, and transactioncapital markets fees can be volatile as they are primarily generated by investment activity within our funds, and therefore are impacted by our investment pace. We have received
Incentive Fees. Incentive fees consist of performance-based incentive arrangements pursuant to management contracts, primarily from certain of our Global Credit funds, when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, incentive fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved.
Investment Income. Investment income consists of our performance allocations as well as the realized and expect to continue to receive requestsunrealized gains and losses resulting from a variety of investorsour equity method investments and groups representing investors to increase the percentage of transaction and advisory fees we share with our investors in future funds; to the extent that we accommodate such requests on future funds, the rebate offset percentages would increase relative to historical levels.other principal investments.
Performance Fees. Performance feesallocations consist principally of the performance-based capital allocation from fund limited partners to us, commonly referred to as carried interest, from certain of our investment funds, which we refer to as the “carry funds.” Carried interest revenue which historically has comprised over 90% of all performance fees in our consolidated financial statements, is recognized by Carlyle upon appreciation of the valuation of our funds’ investments above certain return hurdles as set forth in each respective partnership agreement and is based on the amount that would be due to us pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were liquidated at such date. Accordingly, the amount of carried interest recognized as performance feesallocations reflects our share of the fair value gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. As a result, the performance feesallocations earned in an applicable reporting period are not indicative of any future period, as fair values are based on conditions prevalent as of the reporting date. Refer to “ —“— Trends Affecting our Business” for further discussion.
We account for our strategic investments in NGP under the equity method of accounting. Our investments in NGP include the equity interests in NGP Management Company, L.L.C. (“NGP Management”) and the general partners of certain carry funds advised by NGP. These interests entitle us to an allocation of income equal to 55.0% of the management fee-related revenues of NGP Management, which serves as the investment advisor to certain NGP funds as well as 47.5% of the performance allocations received by the NGP Carry Funds. We record investment income (loss) for our equity income allocation from NGP management fee-related revenues and also record our share of any allocated expenses from NGP Management, expenses associated with the compensatory elements of the strategic investment, and the amortization of the basis differences related to the definite-lived identifiable intangible assets of NGP Management. We also record our equity income allocation from NGP performance allocations in principal investment income (loss) from equity method investments rather than performance allocations in our consolidated statements of operations. We do not control or manage NGP. Moreover, we do not operate NGP’s business, have representation on NGP’s board or serve as an investment advisor to any investment fund sponsored by NGP, nor do we direct the operations of any of NGP portfolio companies. While we have consent rights over certain major actions by NGP outside of the ordinary course of NGP’s business (including, for example, consent rights over items such as amendments to the organizational documents of the entity in which we are invested, changes to the management fee streams earned by NGP under its fund agreements, or the incurrence of certain debt by NGP and other similar items), we have no voting rights or consent rights on any NGP investment committee that selects investments to be made by NGP funds. For further information regarding our strategic investments in NGP, refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition to the performance feesallocations from our CorporateGlobal Private Equity and Real AssetsGlobal Credit carry funds, and closed-end carry funds in the Global Credit segment,NGP Carry Funds, we are also entitled to receive performance feesallocations from our Global Investment Solutions and NGP carryCarlyle
108


Aviation funds. We also retained our interest in the net accrued performance allocations of existing funds at the time of the sale of MRE. The timing of performance feeallocations realizations for these funds is typically later than in our other carry funds based on the terms of such arrangements.
Our performance feesallocations are generated by a diverse set of funds with different vintages, geographic concentration, investment strategies and industry specialties. For an explanation of the fund acronyms used throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section, seerefer to “Item 1. Business — Business—Our Family of Funds.Global Investment Offerings.
Performance feesallocations, before the impact of performance allocations related compensation, in excess of 10% of the total for the yearyears ended December 31, 20172022, 2021 and 2020 were generated from the following funds:
$649.1 million from CP VI (with total AUM of approximately $15.2 billion at December 31, 2017),
$312.7 million from Carlyle Asia Partners IV, L.P. (“CAP IV”) (with total AUM of approximately $5.5 billion at December 31, 2017), and
$311.4 million from Carlyle Partners V, L.P. (“CP V”) (with total AUM of approximately $3.7 billion at December 31, 2017).

97






Performance fees in excess of 10% of the total for the year ended December 31, 2016 were generated primarily from the following funds:
$124.8 million from CP V, and
$89.4 million from Carlyle Realty Partners VII, L.P. (“CRP VII”).
Performance fees in excess of 10% of the total for the year ended December 31, 2015 were generated primarily from the following funds:
$236.8 million from Carlyle Europe Partners III, L.P. (“CEP III”),
$184.5 million from Carlyle Asia Partners III, L.P. (“CAP III”),
$101.1 million from Carlyle Realty Partners VI, L.P. (“CRP VI”), and
$(100.3) million from Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund III, L.P. (“Energy III”).
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
CRP VIII$205.8 CP VI$1,327.5 CP VI$1,124.3 
CPP II187.7 CP VII717.8 CAP IV331.0 
CEP V155.3 
CETP IV150.2 
CP VI(453.2)
No other fund generated over 10% of performance feesallocations in the periods presented above. The reversal of $453.2 million in previously recognized performance allocations in CP VI during 2022 was primarily driven by depreciation in the portfolio, notably its publicly traded investments, which comprise approximately 43% of its remaining fair value as of December 31, 2022. Performance allocations from CP VI during 2021 were driven by appreciation across the portfolio, with notable increases in the values of the publicly traded investments in the portfolio and sale transactions of privately held investments.
Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to our fund vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020, except in certain instances, and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties). In certain instances, carried interest associated with the AlpInvest fund vehicles is subject to entity level income taxes in the Netherlands.
Realized carried interest may be clawed back or given back to the fund if the fund’s investment values decline below certain return hurdles, which vary from fund to fund. When the fair value of a fund’s investments remains constant or falls below certain return hurdles, previously recognized performance feesallocations are reversed. In all cases, each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. For any given period, performance feeallocations revenue on our statement of operations may include reversals of previously recognized performance feesallocations due to a decrease in the value of a particular fund that results in a decrease of cumulative performance feesallocations earned to date. Since fund return hurdles are cumulative, previously recognized performance feesallocations also may be reversed in a period of appreciation that is lower than the particular fund’s hurdle rate. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the reversals of performance fees were $74.2 million, $109.6 million, and $253.4 million, respectively. Additionally, unrealized performance feesallocations reverse when performance feesallocations are realized, and unrealized performance feesallocations can be negative if the amount of realized performance feesallocations exceed total performance feesallocations generated in the period. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the reversals of performance allocations, before the impact of reversals of the related compensation, were $558.7 million, $48.2 million and $401.5 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017,2022, accrued performance feesallocations and accrued giveback obligations were approximately $3.7$7.1 billion and $66.8$40.9 million, respectively. Each balance assumes a hypothetical liquidation of the funds’ investments at December 31, 20172022 at their then current fair values. These assets and liabilities will continue to fluctuate in accordance with the fair values of the fundfunds’ investments until they are realized. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $37.92022, $18.9 million of the accrued giveback obligation is the responsibility of various current and former senior Carlyle professionals and other limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, and the net accrued giveback obligation attributable to Carlyle Holdingsthe Company is $28.9$22.0 million. The PartnershipCompany uses “net accrued performance fees”revenues” to refer to the aggregation of the accrued performance allocations and incentive fees net of (i) accrued giveback obligations, (ii) accrued performance fee allocations and incentive fee-related
109


compensation, (iii) performance allocations and incentive fee-related tax obligations, and (iv) accrued performance allocations and incentive fees attributable to non-controlling interests and excludes any net accrued performance allocations and incentive fees that have been realized but will be collected in subsequent periods. Theperiods, as well as net accrued performance feesrevenues which are presented as fee related performance revenues when realized in our non-GAAP financial measures. Net accrued performance revenues as of December 31, 2017 are $1.72022 were $4.0 billion.
In addition, realized performance feesallocations may be reversed in future periods to the extent that such amounts become subject to a giveback obligation. If at December 31, 2017,2022, all investments held by our carry funds were deemed worthless, the amount of realized and previously distributed performance feesallocations subject to potential giveback would be approximately $0.7$1.5 billion, on an after-tax basis where applicable.applicable, of which approximately $0.7 billion would be the responsibility of current and former senior Carlyle professionals. See the related discussion of “Contingent Obligations (Giveback)” within “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.Resources—Contingent Obligations (Giveback). Since Carlyle's inception,
    The following table summarizes the total amount of aggregate giveback obligations that we have realized a total of approximately $205.5 million in aggregate giveback obligations. Approximately $37.0 millionsince Carlyle’s inception. Given various current and former senior Carlyle professionals and other limited partners of the $205.5 million in aggregateCarlyle Holdings partnerships are responsible for paying the majority of the realized giveback obligationsobligation, the table below also summarizes the amount that was attributable to Carlyle Holdings. the Company:
Inception through December 31, 2022
Total GivebackGiveback Attributable to Carlyle
(Dollars in millions)
Various Legacy Energy Funds$160.8 $57.7 
All other Carlyle Funds78.5 12.9 
Aggregate giveback since inception$239.3 $70.6 
The funding for employee obligations and givebacks related to carry realized pre-IPO is primarily through a collection of employee receivables related to giveback obligations and from non-controlling interests for their portion of the obligation. The realization of giveback obligations for the Partnership'sCompany’s portion of such obligations reduces

98






Distributable Earnings in the period realized and negatively impacts earnings available for distributions to unitholdersshareholders in the period realized. Further, each individual recipient of realized carried interest typically signs a guarantee agreement or partnership agreement that personally obligates such person to return his/her pro rata share of any amounts of realized carried interest previously distributed that are later clawed back. Accordingly, carried interest as performance feeallocation compensation is subject to return to the PartnershipCompany in the event a giveback obligation is funded. Generally, the actual giveback liability, if any, does not become due until the end of a fund’s life.
Each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. As a result, performance feesallocations within funds will continue to fluctuate primarily due to certain investments within each fund constituting a material portion of the carry in that fund. Additionally, the fair value of investments in our funds may have substantial fluctuations from period to period.
In addition, in our discussion of our non-GAAP results, we use the term “net performance fees” to refer to the performance fees from our funds net of the portion allocated to our investment professionals, if any, and certain tax expenses associated with carried interest attributable to certain partners and employees, which are reflected as performance fee related compensation expense. We use the term “realized net performance fees”revenues” to refer to realized performance allocations and incentive fees from our funds, net of the portion allocated to our investment professionals, if any, and certain tax expenses associated with carried interest attributable to certain partners and employees, which are reflected as realized performance feeallocations and incentive fees related compensation expense. See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for the amount of realized and unrealized performance feesrevenues recognized each period. See “—Segment Analysis” for the realized and unrealized performance feesrevenues by segment and related discussion for each period.
Investment income also represents the realized and unrealized gains and losses on our principal investments, including our investments in Carlyle funds that are not consolidated, as well as any interest and other income. Principal investment income also included our proportionate share of U.S. GAAP earnings from our strategic investment in Fortitude prior to the contribution of our investment to a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Realized principal investment income (loss) is recorded when we redeem all or a portion of our investment or when we receive or are due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. A realized principal investment loss is also recorded when an investment is deemed to be worthless. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains (losses) at the time an investment is realized.
110


Fair Value Measurement. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchalhierarchical disclosure framework which ranks the observability of market price inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, the characteristics specific to the financial instrument and the state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices, or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets, will generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.
The table below summarizes the valuation of investments and other financial instruments included within our AUM, by segment and fair value hierarchy levels, as of December 31, 2017 (amounts in millions):2022:
 As of December 31, 2022
 Global
Private
Equity
Global CreditGlobal Investment
Solutions
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Consolidated Results
Level I$4,459 $1,522 $1,084 $7,065 
Level II2,246 32,703 158 35,107 
Level III116,968 99,195 42,279 258,442 
Fair Value of Investments123,673 133,420 43,521 300,614 
Available Capital39,425 12,882 19,770 72,077 
Total AUM$163,098 $146,302 $63,291 $372,691 
 As of December 31, 2017
 
Corporate
Private
Equity
 Real Assets Global Credit 
Investment
Solutions
 Total
Consolidated Results         
Level I$2,729
 $2,380
 $276
 $947
 $6,332
Level II125
 1,201
 340
 
 1,666
Level III39,783
 22,795
 25,749
 29,210
 117,537
Fair Value of Investments42,637
 26,376
 26,365
 30,157
 125,535
Available Capital29,921
 16,512
 6,959
 16,134
 69,526
Total AUM$72,558
 $42,888
 $33,324
 $46,291
 $195,061
Investment Income, Interest, and Other Income. Investment income, interest, and other income represent the unrealized and realized gains and losses on our principal investments, including our investments in Carlyle funds that are not consolidated, our equity method investments and other principal investments, as well as any interest and other income. Investment income (loss) also includes the related amortization of the basis difference between the carrying value of our investment and our share of the underlying net assets of the investee, as well as the compensation expense associated with compensatory arrangements provided by us to employees of our equity method investee, as it relates to our investments in NGP. Realized investment income (loss) is recorded when we redeem all or a portion of our investment or when we receive or are due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. A realized investment loss is also recorded when an investment is deemed to be worthless. Unrealized investment income (loss) results from changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains (losses) at the time an investment is realized.
Interest and Other Income of Consolidated Funds. Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds primarily represents the interest earned on CLO assets. The Consolidated Funds are not the same entities in all periods presented. The Consolidated Funds in future periods may change due to changes in fund terms, formation of new funds, and terminations of funds.

99






Revenue of a Real Estate VIE. Revenue of a real estate VIE consists of revenue generated by Urbplan, which primarily is revenue earned for land development services using the completed contract method and investment income earned on Urbplan’s investments. Under the completed contract method of revenue recognition, revenue is not recognized until the period in which the land development services contract is completed, which can cause volatility from period to period based on which contracts are completed. Urbplan was deconsolidated from the Partnership's financial results during 2017 as a result of the Partnership disposing of its interests in Urbplan in a transaction in which a third party acquired operational control and all of the economic interests in Urbplan (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements).
Net Investment Gains of Consolidated Funds. Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds measures the change in the difference in fair value between the assets and the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. A gain (loss) indicates that the fair value of the assets of the Consolidated Funds appreciated more (less), or depreciated less (more), than the fair value of the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. A gain or loss is not necessarily indicative of the investment performance of the Consolidated Funds and does not impact the management or incentive fees received by Carlyle for its management of the Consolidated Funds. The portion of the net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds attributable to the limited partner investors is allocated to non-controlling interests. Therefore, a gain or loss is not expected to have a material impact on the revenues or profitability of the Partnership.Company. Moreover, although the assets of the Consolidated Funds are consolidated onto our balance sheet pursuant to U.S. GAAP, ultimately we do not have recourse to such assets and such liabilities are generally non-recourse to us. Therefore, a gain or loss from the Consolidated Funds generally does not impact the assets available to our equity holders.common stockholders.
Expenses
Compensation and Benefits. Compensation includes salaries, bonuses, equity-based compensation, and performance payment arrangements. Bonuses are accrued over the service period to which they relate.
We recognize as compensation expense the portion of performance allocations and incentive fees that are due to our employees, senior Carlyle professionals, advisors, and operating executives in a manner consistent with how we recognize the performance allocations and incentive fee revenue. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the related performance allocations and incentive fee revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Compensation in respect of performance allocations and incentive fees is paid when the related performance allocations and incentive fees are realized, and not when such performance allocations and incentive fees are accrued. The funds do not have a uniform allocation of performance allocations and incentive fees to our employees, senior Carlyle professionals and operating executives. Therefore, for any given period, the ratio of performance allocations and incentive fee compensation to performance allocations and incentive fee revenue may vary based on the funds generating the performance allocations and incentive fee revenue for that period and their particular allocation percentages.
111


In addition, we have implemented various equity-based compensation arrangements, thatincluding those under our Equity Incentive Plan. These equity-based compensation arrangements require senior Carlyle professionals and other employees to vest ownership of a portion of their equity interests over a service period of upgenerally one to 60 months,four years, which under U.S. GAAP will result in compensation charges over current and future periods. Further,In 2021, we granted 7.1 million in orderlong-term strategic restricted stock units to recruit and retain existing and futurecertain senior professionals. The majority of these restricted stock units are eligible to vest based on the achievement of annual performance targets over four years, with a larger proportion of the awards eligible to vest based on the 2024 performance year. On February 1, 2023, we granted a total of 9.9 million restricted stock units under the Equity Incentive Plan to our personnel, including certain senior Carlyle professionals and other employees,key personnel. In addition, on February 15, 2023, we have implemented additionalwill grant performance- and time-based inducement equity awards in connection with the appointment of our new Chief Executive Officer. As a result of these grants, and combined with a higher share price than in periods prior to 2021, equity-based compensation programs that have resulted in increases to our equity-based compensation expenses, which is a trend that may continueexpense will be higher in the future if we increase our issuance of deferred restricted common units as employee compensation. For example, in February 2017 and 2018, we granted approximately 7.6 million and 13.7 million, respectively, deferred restricted common units across a significant number of our employees; these awards vest over a period of 12 to 60 months. Compensation charges associated with the equity-based compensation grants issued in our initial public offering in May 2012 or grants issued in acquisitions or strategic investments are excluded from our calculation of Economic Income.coming years than it has been. Compensation charges associated with all equity-based compensation grants are excluded from Fee Related Earnings and Distributable Earnings. As of December 31, 2022, the total number of the Company’s common shares available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan was 12,861,371, which does not reflect the restricted stock units granted on February 1, 2023. An increase in the number of shares available for grant under the plan would require shareholder approval.
We may hire additional individuals and overall compensation levels may correspondingly increase, which could result in an increase in compensation and benefits expense. As a result of prior acquisitions, we have charges associated with contingent consideration taking the form of earn-outs and profit participation, some of which are reflected as compensation expense. A portion of our compensation expense relates to internal fundraising costs, and compensation will fluctuate based on increases or decreases in our fundraising activity. Amounts due to employees related to such fundraising will be expensed when earned even though the benefit of the new capital and related fees will be reflected in operations over the life of the related fund.
General, Administrative and Other Expenses. General, administrative and other expenses include occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses, which consist principally of professional fees, including those related to our global regulatory compliance program, external costs of fundraising, travel and related expenses, communications and information services, depreciation and amortization (including intangible asset amortization and impairment) and foreign currency transactions. We expect that general, administrative and other expenses will vary due to infrequently occurring or unusual

100






items, such as impairment of intangible assets or lease right-of-use assets and expenses or insurance recoveries associated with litigation and contingencies. Also, in periods of significant fundraising, to the extent that we use third parties to assist in our fundraising efforts, our general, administrative and other expenses may increase accordingly. Similarly, our general, administrative and other expenses may increase as a result of professional and other fees incurred as part of due diligence related to strategic acquisitions and new product development. Additionally, we anticipate that general, administrative and other expenses will fluctuate from period to period due to the impact of foreign exchange transactions.
We also could incur additional expenses in the future related to our acquisitions including amortization of acquired intangibles and earn-outs to equity holders and fair value adjustments on contingent consideration issued, as well as related to our global compliance efforts.holders. As discussed in Note 67 to the consolidated financial statements, we evaluate our intangible assets (including goodwill) for impairment and could record additional impairment losses in future periods.
Interest and Other Expenses of Consolidated Funds. The interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds consist primarily of interest expenses related primarily to our CLO loans, professional fees and other third-party expenses.
Interest and Other Expenses of a Real Estate VIE and Loss on Deconsolidation. Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation reflects the loss recognized in 2017 as a result of the Partnership disposing of its interests in Urbplan in a transaction in which a third party acquired operational control and all of the economic interests in Urbplan, which resulted in the deconsolidation of Urbplan from the Partnership's financial results (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements). This line item also includes expenses incurred by Urbplan prior to deconsolidation, consisting primarily of interest expense, general and administrative expenses, impairment charges, compensation and benefits, and costs associated with land development services. Also included in this caption is the change in our estimate of the fair value of Urbplan’s loans payable.

Income Taxes. The Carlyle Holdings partnerships and their subsidiaries primarily operate as pass-through entities for U.S. income tax purposes and record a provision for state and local income taxes for certain entities based on applicable laws and a provision for foreign income taxes for certain foreign entities. In addition, Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. is subject to U.S. income taxes on only a portion of our income or loss. Depending on the sources of our taxable income or loss, our income tax provision or benefit can vary significantly from period to period.
Income taxes for foreign entities are accounted for using the asset and liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period in which the change is enacted. For instance, in December 2017, new corporate federal income tax rates were enacted, which impacted the Partnership's deferred tax assets and liabilities. See Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements for more information on the newly enacted corporate federal income tax rates. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by federal and certain state, local and foreign tax regulators. AsWith a few exceptions, as of December 31, 2017,2022, our U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 20142019 through 20162021 are open under the normal three-yearthree-years statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination. State and local tax returns are generally subject to audit from 20122017 to 2016.2021. Foreign tax returns are generally subject to audit from 20092011 to 2016.2021. Certain of our affiliates are currently under audit by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. Currently, the Internal Revenue Service is examining the tax returns of certain subsidiaries for the 2013, 2014 and 2015 years. We do not believe the outcome of any future audit will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities. Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities represent the component of equity in consolidated entities not held by us. These interests are adjusted for general partner allocations.
Earnings Per Common Share.We record significant non-controlling interestscompute earnings per common share in Carlyle Holdings relatingaccordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the ownership interestscommon shares of the limited partnersCompany by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share
112


reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. We apply the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive weighted-average common shares represented by unvested restricted stock units. For certain equity-based compensation awards that contain performance or market conditions, the number of contingently issuable common shares is included in diluted earnings per common share based on the number of common shares, if any, that would be issuable under the terms of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. The Partnership, through wholly owned subsidiaries,awards if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period, if the result is the sole general partner of Carlyle Holdings. Accordingly, the Partnership consolidates the financial position and results of operations of Carlyle Holdings into its financial statements, and the other ownership interests in Carlyle Holdings are reflected as a non-controlling interest in the Partnership’s financial statements.dilutive.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Economic Income. Economic income,Distributable Earnings. Distributable Earnings, or “EI,“DE,” is a key performance benchmark used in our industry. EI was formerly defined as “Economic Net Income.” There has been no changeindustry and is evaluated regularly by management in making resource deployment and compensation decisions, and in assessing the performance of our three segments. We also use DE in our budgeting, forecasting, and the overall management of our segments. We believe that reporting DE is helpful to understanding our business and that investors should review the computationsame supplemental financial measure that management uses to analyze our segment performance. DE is intended to show the amount of this measure. EInet realized earnings without the effects of consolidation of the Consolidated Funds. DE is derived from our segment reported results and is an additional measure to assess performance.
Distributable Earnings differs from income (loss) before provision for income taxes computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP in that it includes certain tax expenses

101






associated with performance fees,revenues (comprised of performance allocations and incentive fees), and does not include unrealized performance allocations and related compensation expense, unrealized principal investment income, equity-based compensation expense, net income (loss) attributable to non-Carlyle interestsinterest in consolidated entities, or charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items. Charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items include: charges associated with equity-based compensation that was issued in the initial public offering in May 2012 or is issued in acquisitions, dispositions or strategic investments, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, corporate conversion costs, amortization and any impairment charges associated with acquired intangible assets, transaction costs associated with acquisitions and dispositions, charges associated with earnouts and contingent consideration including gains and losses associated with the estimated fair value of contingent consideration issued in conjunction with acquisitions or strategic investments, impairment charges associated with lease right-of-use assets, gains and losses from the retirement of debt, charges associated with contract terminations and employee severance. We believe the inclusion or exclusion of these items provides investors with a meaningful indication of our core operating performance. For segment reporting purposes, revenues and expenses, and, accordingly, segment net income, are presented on a basis that deconsolidates the Consolidated Funds. Total Segment EI equals the aggregate of EI for all segments. This measure supplements and should be considered in addition to and not in lieu of the results of operations discussed further under “Consolidated“—Consolidated Results of Operations” prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Fee Related Earnings. Fee Related Earnings, or “FRE,” is a component of EIDE and is used to assess the ability of the business to cover direct base compensation and operating expenses from total fee revenues. FRE differs from income (loss) before provision for income taxes computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP in that it adjusts for the items included in the calculation of EIDE and also adjusts EIDE to exclude net realized performance fees,revenues, realized principal investment income from investments in Carlyle funds, equity-based compensation, net interest (interest income less interest expense), and certain general, administrative and other expenses when the timing of any future payment is uncertain. AsFee Related Earnings includes fee related performance revenues and related compensation expense. Fee related performance revenues represent the realized portion of December 31, 2017, the Partnership updated the definitionperformance revenues that are measured and received on a recurring basis, are not dependent on realization events, and which have no risk of FRE to exclude net interest (interest income less interest expense) in our segment results. FRE for all prior periods presented has been recast to reflect the updated definition.
Distributable Earnings. Distributable Earnings is FRE plus realized net performance fees, realized investment income, and net interest. Distributable Earnings is intended to show the amount of net realized earnings without the effects of consolidation of the Consolidated Funds. Distributable Earnings is derived from our segment reported results and is an additional measure to assess performance and determine amounts potentially available for distribution from Carlyle Holdings to its unitholders. Distributable Earnings is evaluated regularly by management in making resource deployment and compensation decisions and in assessing performance of our four segments. We also use Distributable Earnings in our budgeting, forecasting, and the overall management of our segments. We believe that reporting Distributable Earnings is helpful to understanding our business and that investors should review the same supplemental financial measure that management uses to analyze our segment performance.giveback.
Operating Metrics
We monitor certain operating metrics that are common to the alternative asset management industry.
Fee-earning Assets under Management
Management. Fee-earning assets under management or Fee-earning AUM refers to the assets we manage or advise from which we derive recurring fund management fees. Our Fee-earning AUM is generally based on one of the following, once fees have been activated:
(a)the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired, for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period and for Metropolitan carry funds during the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds (see “Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);
(b)the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co-investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired, Metropolitan carry funds after the expiration of the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds, and one of our business development companies (see “Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);
(c)the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), as defined in the fund indentures (typically exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date for each CLO (see “Fee-earning AUM based on collateral balances, at par” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);

(a)the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired, for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period and for Metropolitan carry funds during the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds (see “Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);
(b)the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co-investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired and one of our business development companies (see “Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);
102
113







(c)the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our CLOs and other securitization vehicles, as defined in the fund indentures (typically exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date;
(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of our hedge fund and fund of hedge funds vehicles (pre redemptions and subscriptions), as well as certain carry funds (see “Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);
(e)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), excluding cash and cash equivalents, of one of our business development companies and certain carry funds (see “Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period); and
(f)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired, (see “Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period).
(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of certain carry funds (see “Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);
(e)the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement (see “Fee-earning AUM based on fair value and other” in the table below);
(f)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), excluding cash and cash equivalents, of one of our business development companies and certain carry funds (included in “Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other” in the table below); and
(g)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired, (included in “Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other” in the table below).
The table below details Fee-earning AUM by its respective components at each period.
 As of December 31,
 202220212020
Consolidated Results(Dollars in millions)
Components of Fee-earning AUM
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments(1)
$81,057 $71,829 $77,729 
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital(2)
60,459 60,828 38,055 
Fee-earning AUM based on collateral balances, at par(3)
46,173 30,779 26,480 
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value(4)
11,979 9,645 7,966 
Fee-earning AUM based on fair value and other(5)
66,909 20,338 19,872 
Balance, End of Period(6)
$266,577 $193,419 $170,102 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated Results(Dollars in millions)
Components of Fee-earning AUM   
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments (1)$58,618
 $51,455
 $47,745
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital (2)24,263
 25,976
 33,823
Fee-earning AUM based on collateral balances, at par (3)18,625
 16,999
 17,896
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value (4)1,776
 977
 9,634
Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other (5)21,313
 19,587
 21,896
Balance, End of Period (6)$124,595
 $114,994
 $130,994
(1)Reflects limited partner capital commitments where the original investment period, weighted-average investment period, or commitment fee period has not expired.
(1)Reflects limited partner capital commitments where the original investment period, weighted-average investment period, or commitment fee period has not expired.
(2)Reflects limited partner invested capital at cost and includes amounts committed to or reserved for investments for certain Real Assets and Investment Solutions funds.
(3)Represents the amount of aggregate Fee-earning collateral balances and principal balances, at par, for our CLOs/structured products.
(4)Reflects the net asset value (pre-redemptions and subscriptions) of our hedge funds, mutual fund and fund of hedge funds vehicles, as well as certain other carry funds.
(5)Includes funds with fees based on gross asset value.
(6)Energy II, Energy III, Energy IV, Renew I, and Renew II (collectively, the “Legacy Energy Funds”), are managed with Riverstone Holdings LLC and its affiliates. Affiliates of both Carlyle and Riverstone act as investment advisers to each of the Legacy Energy Funds. With the exception of Energy IV and Renew II, where Carlyle has a minority representation on the funds’ management committees, management of each of the Legacy Energy Funds is vested in committees with equal representation by Carlyle and Riverstone, and the consent of representatives of both Carlyle and Riverstone is required for investment decisions. As of December 31, 2017, the Legacy Energy Funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $5.2 billion in AUM and $3.8 billion in Fee-earning AUM. We are no longer raising capital for the Legacy Energy Funds and expect these balances to continue to decrease over time as the funds wind down.

(2)Reflects limited partner invested capital at cost and includes amounts committed to or reserved for investments for certain Global Private Equity and Global Investment Solutions funds.
103(3)Represents the amount of aggregate Fee-earning collateral balances and principal balances, at par, for our CLOs/structured products.



(4)Reflects the net asset value of certain other carry funds.

(5)Includes the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement, funds with fees based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and funds with fees based on gross asset value.

(6)Ending balance excludes $11.1 billion of pending Fee-earning AUM as of December 31, 2022 for which fees have not yet been activated.


The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Fee-earning AUM.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated Results(Dollars in millions)
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$114,994
 $130,994
 $135,580
Acquisitions/(Divestments) (1)
 (4,356) 
Inflows, including Commitments (2)18,545
 11,799
 22,950
Outflows, including Distributions (3)(14,658) (17,138) (18,940)
Subscriptions, net of Redemptions (4)
 (4,930) (4,528)
Changes in CLO collateral balances (5)843
 (714) 850
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (6)(90) (73) (1,147)
Foreign Exchange and other (7)4,961
 (588) (3,771)
Balance, End of Period$124,595
 $114,994
 $130,994
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Consolidated Results(Dollars in millions)
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$193,419 $170,102 $161,057 
Inflows(1)
95,534 46,199 22,481 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(18,431)(23,361)(17,130)
Market Activity & Other(3)
(505)3,860 (466)
Foreign Exchange(4)
(3,440)(3,381)4,160 
Balance, End of Period$266,577 $193,419 $170,102 
 
(1)Divestment activity in 2016 represents ESG assets which were transferred to the ESG founders in a transaction that closed in October 2016 and Claren Road assets which were transferred to the Claren Road founders in a transaction that closed in January 2017.
(2)
Inflows represent limited partner capital raised and capital invested by our carry funds and the NGP management fee funds outside the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period. Inflows do not include funds raised of $22.1 billion, which are not yet earning fees.
114


(1)Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period, the fee-earning commitments invested in vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital, the fee-earning collateral balance of new CLO issuances, as well as gross subscriptions in our vehicles for which management fees are based on net asset value. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM. Inflows for the year ended December 31, 2022 include $2 billion of Fee-earning AUM acquired as part of the August 2022 Abingworth transaction, Fee-earning AUM of $48 billion associated with the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude which was effective April 1, 2022, and Fee-earning AUM of $14 billion acquired in the March 2022 CBAM transaction.
(2)Outflows represents the impact of realizations from vehicles with management fees based on remaining invested capital at cost or fair value, changes in basis for funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired during the period, reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees, gross redemptions in our open-end funds, and runoff of CLO collateral balances. Distributions for funds earning management fees based on commitments during the period do not affect Fee-earning AUM. Outflows during the year ended December 31, 2021 also reflect the sale of MRE on April 1, 2021, which had $2 billion of Fee-earning AUM as of March 31, 2021.
(3)Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value, as well as activity of funds with fees based on gross asset value.
(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(3)
Outflows represent limited partner distributions from our carry funds and NGP management fee funds, changes in basis for our carry funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired, and reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees.
(4)Represents the net result of subscriptions to and redemptions from our hedge funds, mutual fund and fund of hedge funds vehicles.
(5)
Represents the change in the aggregate Fee-earning collateral balances at par of our CLOs/structured products, as of the quarterly cut-off dates.
(6)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value.
(7)
Includes activity of funds with fees based on gross asset value. Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
Refer to “—Segment Analysis” for a detailed discussion by segment of the activity affecting Fee-earning AUM for each of the periods presented by segment.
Assets under Management
Management. Assets under management”management or “AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise. Our AUM equals the sum of the following:
(a) the aggregate fair value of our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, NGP management fee funds and separately managed accounts, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those funds and vehicles (including Carlyle commitments to those funds and vehicles and those of senior Carlyle professionals and employees) pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those funds and vehicles;
(b)the amount of aggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or aggregate principal amount of the notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions);
(c)the net asset value (pre-redemptions and subscriptions) of our long/short credit, emerging markets, multi-product macroeconomic, fund of hedge funds vehicles, mutual fund and other hedge funds; and
(d)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of our business development companies, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitles
(b)     the amount of aggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or aggregate principal amount of the notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions);
(c)     the net asset value of certain carry funds;
(d)    the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement; and
(e)     the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of our business development companies, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles.


104






We include in our calculation of AUM and Fee-earning AUM certain energy and renewable resources fundsthe Legacy Energy Funds that we jointly advise with Riverstone Holdings L.L.C. (“Riverstone”) and certainthe NGP management fee funds and carry fundsEnergy Funds that are advised by NGP. Our calculation of AUM also includes third-party capital raised for the investment in Fortitude through a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund and from a strategic investor which directly invests in Fortitude alongside the fund. The AUM and Fee-earning AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude is inclusive of the net asset value of investments in Carlyle products. These amounts are also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested.
For most of our carry funds, total AUM includes the fair value of the capital invested, whereas Fee-earning AUM includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital, depending on whether the original investment period for the fund has expired. As such, Fee-earning AUM may be greater than total AUM when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments is less than the cost of those investments.
Our calculations of AUM and Fee-earning AUM may differ from the calculations of other alternative asset managers. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other alternative asset managers. In addition, our calculation of AUM (but not Fee-earning AUM) includes uncalled commitments to, and the fair value of invested capital in, our investment funds from Carlyle and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to management
115


fees or performance fees.allocations. Our calculations of AUM or Fee-earning AUM are not based on any definition of AUM or Fee-earning AUM that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage or advise.
We generally use Fee-earning AUM as a metric to measure changes in the assets from which we earn recurring management fees. Total AUM tends to be a better measure of our investment and fundraising performance as it reflects investments at fair value plus available capital.
Available Capital
"Capital. Available Capital"Capital” refers to the amount of capital commitments available to be called for investments, which may be reduced for equity invested that is funded via a fund credit facility and expected to be called from investors at a later date, plus any additional assets/liabilities at the fund level other than active investments. Amounts previously called may be added back to available capital following certain distributions. “Expired Available Capital” occurs when a fund has passed the investment and follow-on periods and can no longer invest capital into new or existing deals. Any remaining Available Capital, typically a result of either recycled distributions or specific reserves established for the follow-on period that are not drawn, can only be called for fees and expenses and is therefore removed from the Total AUM calculation.


The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Total AUM.

 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Consolidated Results     
Total AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$157,607
 $182,595
 $194,473
Acquisitions/(Divestments) (1)
 (4,707) 
New Commitments (2)42,846
 13,216
 24,064
Outflows (3)(27,409) (37,692) (39,139)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (4)17,104
 10,148
 9,772
Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) (5)6,493
 (1,195) (6,121)
Other (6)(1,580) (4,758) (454)
Balance, End of Period$195,061
 $157,607
 $182,595
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Consolidated Results
Total AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$300,957 $245,769 $224,442 
Inflows(1)
94,824 51,261 26,902 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(35,665)(47,483)(21,477)
Market Activity & Other(3)
18,109 57,125 10,380 
Foreign Exchange(4)
(5,534)(5,715)5,522 
Balance, End of Period$372,691 $300,957 $245,769 
 
(1)Divestment activity represents ESG assets which were transferred to the ESG founders in a transaction that closed in October 2016 and Claren Road assets which were transferred to the Claren Road founders in a transaction that closed in January 2017.
(2)New Commitments reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing.
(3)Outflows includes distributions in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, NGP management fee funds and separately managed accounts, as well as runoff of CLO collateral balances and redemptions in our hedge funds and fund of hedge funds vehicles.

(1)Inflows reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing. Inflows for the year ended December 31, 2022 include $2 billion of AUM acquired as part of the August 2022 Abingworth transaction, AUM of $48 billion associated with the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude which was effective April 1, 2022, and AUM of $15 billion acquired in the March 2022 CBAM transaction.
105(2)Outflows includes distributions net of recallable or recyclable amounts in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, gross redemptions in our open-end funds, runoff of CLO collateral balances and the expiration of available capital. Outflows for the year ended December 31, 2021 also reflect the sale of Metropolitan on April 1, 2021, which had $2.4 billion of Total AUM as of March 31, 2021.



(3)Market Activity & Other generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, as well as the net impact of fees, expenses and non-investment income, change in gross asset value for our business development companies and other changes in AUM.

(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.


(4)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, NGP management fee funds, separately managed accounts, hedge funds and fund of hedge funds vehicles. Appreciation for 2017 was driven by 29% appreciation ($2.6 billion) in the public portfolio and 26% appreciation ($10.3 billion) in the private portfolio of our Corporate Private Equity, Real Assets, and Global Credit carry funds, in addition to $3.6 billion of appreciation in our Investment Solutions carry funds.
(5)Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(6)Includes expiring available capital, the impact of capital calls for fees and expenses, change in gross asset value for our business development companies and other changes in AUM.


Please refer to “—Segment Analysis” for a detailed discussion by segment of the activity affecting Total AUM for each of the periods presented.
Perpetual Capital.“Perpetual Capital” refers to the assets we manage or advise which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors upon the realization of investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law. Perpetual Capital may be materially reduced or terminated under certain conditions, including reductions from changes in valuations and payments to investors, including through elections by investors to redeem their investments, dividend payments, and other payment obligations, as well as the termination of or failure to renew the respective investment advisory agreements. Perpetual Capital includes: (a) assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, (b) our Core Plus real estate fund, (c) our business development companies and certain other
116


direct lending products, and (d) our Interval Fund. As of December 31, 2022, our Total AUM and Fee-earning AUM included $61.0 billion and $58.2 billion, respectively, of Perpetual Capital.
Portfolio Appreciation (Depreciation). The table below presentsoverall portfolio appreciation of 11% in 2022 is comprised of 6% appreciation for carry funds within our Global Private Equity segment focusing on corporate private equity, 16% for funds focusing on real estate and 48% for fund focusing on infrastructure and natural resources, 3% appreciation for carry funds in the changeGlobal Credit segment and 6% appreciation for carry funds in appreciation on portfoliothe Global Investment Solutions segment. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, carry funds in our Global Investment Solutions segment appreciated 4% in 2022. Our publicly traded investments, which comprise 6% of the total fair value in our carry funds. Please refer to “— Segment Analysis”fund portfolio, depreciated (24)% during the year.
While there is no perfectly comparable market index benchmark for a detailed discussion by segmentthe overall portfolio or any of its segments or strategies, we would note that S&P 500 and MSCI ACWI depreciation for the activity affecting Total AUM for each ofyear were (19)% and (20)%, respectively, while the periods presented.FTSE NAREIT Composite depreciation was (28)%, the S&P Oil and Gas Exploration & Production Index appreciation was 50%, and S&P Leveraged Loan Index depreciation was (5)%.
(1)Corporate Private Equity, Real Assets, and Global Credit carry funds only, excluding external co-investment.
(2)For Carlyle returns, “Appreciation/Depreciation” represents realized and unrealized gain / loss for the period on a total return basis before fees and expenses. The percentage of return is calculated as the sum of ending remaining investment fair market value ("FMV") and net investment outflow (sales proceeds less net purchases) less beginning remaining investment FMV divided by beginning remaining investment FMV.
(3)Public portfolio includes initial public offerings ("IPO") that occurred in the quarter. Investments may be reported as private in quarters prior to the IPO quarter.
(4)The MSCI ACWI - All Cap Index represents the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index across all market capitalization sizes of the global equity market.  There are significant differences between the types of securities and assets typically acquired by our carry funds and the investments covered by the MSCI All Country World Index. Specifically, our carry funds may make investments in securities and other assets that have a greater degree of risk and volatility, and less liquidity, than those securities included in the MSCI All Country World Index.  Moreover, investors in the securities included in the MSCI All Country World Index may not be subject to the management fees, carried interest or expenses to which investors in our carry funds are typically subject.  Comparisons between the our carry fund appreciation and the MSCI All Country World Index are included for informational purposes only.



106






Consolidation of Certain Carlyle Funds
The PartnershipCompany consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities. On January 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted ASU 2015-2, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which provides a revised consolidation model for all reporting entities to use in evaluating whether to consolidate certain types of legal entities. As a result, the Partnership deconsolidated the majority of the Partnership's consolidated funds on January 1, 2016. The entities we consolidate are referred to collectively as the Consolidated Funds in our consolidated financial statements. For further information on our consolidation policy, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of December 31, 2017,2022, our Consolidated Funds represent approximately 2% of our AUM; 2%1% of our fund management fees; and less than 1% of our performance feesinvestment income or loss for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.
We are not required under the revised consolidation guidance to consolidate in our financial statements most of the investment funds we advise. However, we consolidate certain CLOs and certain other funds that we advise. As of December 31, 2017,2022, our consolidated CLOs held approximately $4.9$6.2 billion of total assets and comprised substantially allthe majority of the assets and loans payable of the Consolidated Funds. The assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are generally held within separate legal entities and, as a result, the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are non-recourse to us. For further information on consolidation of certain funds, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Generally, the consolidation of the Consolidated Funds has a gross-up effect on our assets, liabilities and cash flows but has no net effect on the net income attributable to the PartnershipCompany and partners’ capital.equity. The majority of the net economic ownership interests of the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the consolidated financial statements. For further information, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Because only a small portion of our funds are consolidated, the performance of the Consolidated Funds is not necessarily consistent with or representative of the combined performance trends of all of our funds.
For further information on our consolidation policy and the consolidation of certain funds, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table and discussion sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis for all historical periods presented; however, the consolidated funds are not the same entities in all periods shown due to changes in U.S. GAAP, changes in fund terms and the creation and termination of funds. As further described below,above, the consolidation of these funds primarily had the impact of increasing interest and other income of Consolidated Funds, interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds, and net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds in the year that the fund is initially consolidated. The consolidation of these funds had no effect on net income attributable to the PartnershipCompany for the periods presented.

107117








 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Revenues
Fund management fees$2,030.1 $1,667.5 $1,486.0 
Incentive fees63.7 48.8 37.0 
Investment income (loss)
Performance allocations1,327.5 6,084.6 1,635.9 
Principal investment income (loss)570.5 637.3 (540.7)
Total investment income1,898.0 6,721.9 1,095.2 
Interest and other income135.9 90.7 89.6 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds311.0 253.2 226.8 
Total revenues4,438.7 8,782.1 2,934.6 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation1,052.0 908.0 849.6 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation719.9 2,961 779.1 
Total compensation and benefits1,925.9 4,032.1 1,733.7 
General, administrative, and other expenses575.8 431.7 349.3 
Interest110.4 113.3 94.0 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds211.6 178.5 163.5 
Other non-operating (income) expenses1.0 1.5 (7.2)
Total expenses2,824.7 4,757.1 2,333.3 
Other income (loss)
Net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds(41.5)2.5 (21.3)
Income before provision for income taxes1,572.5 4,027.5 580.0 
Provision for income taxes287.8 982.3 197.2 
Net income1,284.7 3,045.2 382.8 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities59.7 70.5 34.6 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. Common Stockholders$1,225.0 $2,974.7 $348.2 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. per common share
Basic$3.39 $8.37 $0.99 
Diluted$3.35 $8.20 $0.97 
Weighted-average common shares
Basic361,278,064 355,241,653 350,464,315 
Diluted365,707,722 362,574,564 358,393,802 
118
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions, except unit and per unit data)
Revenues     
Fund management fees$1,026.9
 $1,076.1
 $1,085.2
Performance fees     
Realized1,097.3
 1,129.5
 1,441.9
Unrealized996.6
 (377.7) (617.0)
Total performance fees2,093.9
 751.8
 824.9
Investment income (loss)     
Realized70.4
 112.9
 32.9
Unrealized161.6
 47.6
 (17.7)
Total investment income232.0
 160.5
 15.2
Interest and other income36.7
 23.9
 18.6
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds177.7
 166.9
 975.5
Revenue of a real estate VIE109.0
 95.1
 86.8
Total revenues3,676.2
 2,274.3
 3,006.2
Expenses     
Compensation and benefits     
Base compensation652.7
 647.1
 632.2
Equity-based compensation320.3
 334.6
 378.0
Performance fee related     
Realized520.7
 580.5
 650.5
Unrealized467.6
 (227.4) (139.6)
Total compensation and benefits1,961.3
 1,334.8
 1,521.1
General, administrative, and other expenses276.8
 521.1
 712.8
Interest65.5
 61.3
 58.0
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds197.6
 128.5
 1,039.3
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation202.5
 207.6
 144.6
Other non-operating income(71.4) (11.2) (7.4)
Total expenses2,632.3
 2,242.1
 3,468.4
Other income     
Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds88.4
 13.1
 864.4
Income before provision for income taxes1,132.3
 45.3
 402.2
Provision for income taxes124.9
 30.0
 2.1
Net income1,007.4
 15.3
 400.1
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities72.5
 41.0
 537.9
Net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings934.9
 (25.7) (137.8)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings690.8
 (32.1) (119.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.244.1
 6.4
 (18.4)
Net income attributable to Series A Preferred Unitholders6.0
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders$238.1
 $6.4
 $(18.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. per common unit     
Basic$2.58
 $0.08
 $(0.24)
Diluted$2.38
 $(0.08) $(0.30)
Weighted-average common units     
Basic92,136,959
 82,714,178
 74,523,935
Diluted100,082,548
 308,522,990
 298,739,382


108







Year Ended December 31, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162021 and Year Ended December 31, 20162021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015.2020.
Revenues
Total revenues increased $1,401.9 million,decreased $4.3 billion, or 62%49%, for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 and decreased $731.9 million,increased $5.8 billion, or 24%199%, for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the changes in total revenues for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Total Revenues, prior year$8,782.1 $2,934.6 
Increases (Decreases):
Increase in fund management fees362.6 181.5 
Increase in incentive fees14.9 11.8 
(Decrease) increase in investment income, including performance allocations(4,823.9)5,626.7 
Increase in interest and other income of Consolidated Funds57.8 26.4 
Increase in interest and other income45.2 1.1 
Total (decrease) increase(4,343.4)5,847.5 
Total Revenues, current year$4,438.7 $8,782.1 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Total Revenues, prior year$2,274.3
$3,006.2
Increases (decreases):  
   Decrease in fund management fees(49.2)(9.1)
   Increase (decrease) in performance fees1,342.1
(73.1)
   Increase in investment income71.5
145.3
   Increase (decrease) in interest and other income of
Consolidated Funds
10.8
(808.6)
   Increase in revenue of a real estate VIE13.9
8.3
   Increase in interest and other income12.8
5.3
   Total increase (decrease)1,401.9
(731.9)
Total Revenues, current year$3,676.2
$2,274.3
Fund Management Fees. Fund management fees decreased $49.2increased $362.6 million, or 5%22%, for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and decreased $9.1increased $181.5 million, or 1%12%, for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, primarily due to the following:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Higher management fees from the commencement of the investment period for certain newly raised funds$312.4 $183.0 
Lower management fees resulting from the change in basis for earning
management fees from commitments to invested capital for certain funds
and from net investment activity in funds whose management fees are based on invested capital
(65.2)(28.3)
Increase (decrease) in catch-up management fees from subsequent closes of funds that are in the fundraising period9.1 (5.8)
Higher transaction and portfolio advisory fees15.5 39.9 
Higher management fees due to CBAM and Abingworth acquisitions and Fortitude strategic advisory services agreement116.7 — 
Lower fund management fees due to sale of MRE on April 1, 2021(4.7)(15.9)
All other changes(1)
(21.2)8.6 
Total increase in fund management fees$362.6 $181.5 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Management fees from funds that were deconsolidated as a result of
adoption of ASU 2015-2 on January 1, 2016 (See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements)
$
$139.7
Higher management fees from the commencement of the
investment period for certain newly raised funds
99.0
112.4
Lower management fees resulting from the change in basis for
earning management fees from commitments to invested capital
for certain funds and from distributions from funds whose
management fees are based on invested capital
(63.0)(117.8)
Decrease in catch-up management fees from subsequent closes of funds
that are in the fundraising period
(6.6)(63.7)
Lower management fees from lower assets under management in
our former hedge funds
(66.4)(88.9)
(Lower) higher transaction and portfolio advisory fees(4.2)22.6
All other changes(8.0)(13.4)
Total decrease in fund management fees$(49.2)$(9.1)
(1) The change in the year ended December 31, 2022 includes a $12.7 million loss related to the purchase of third party investor interests in a Global Investment Solutions product, which was recorded as a reduction to fund management fees.
Fund management fees include transaction and portfolio advisory fees, net of rebate offsets, of $43.6$106.2 million, $47.8$90.7 million, and $25.2$50.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. The decrease in transaction and portfolio advisory fees
119


Investment Income. Investment income decreased $4.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, and the increaseincreased $5.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 20152020. The components of investment income are included in the following table:
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Performance allocations, excluding NGP$1,327.5 $6,084.6 $1,635.9 
Investment income from NGP:
Net investment income from NGP Management58.1 59.2 58.6 
Performance allocations from investment in the general partners of the NGP Carry Funds560.7 3.8 — 
Net investment income from principal investments in NGP Carry Funds44.5 20.1 (12.0)
Investment income (loss) from our carry funds:
Global Private Equity76.4 258.8 89.6 
Global Credit(14.6)12.3 (1.9)
Global Investment Solutions9.5 27.0 9.8 
Investment (loss) income from our CLOs(48.6)22.9 (1.8)
Investment (loss) income from Carlyle FRL(119.0)161.0 (691.9)
Investment income from our other Global Credit products(0.7)17.6 9.1 
Investment income (loss) on foreign currency hedges1.1 (3.9)2.3 
All other investment income (loss) (1)
3.1 58.5 (2.5)
Total investment income$1,898.0 $6,721.9 $1,095.2 
(1) All other investment income in 2021includes investment income of $49.8 million associated with the remeasurement of a corporate investment, which was previously carried at cost, resulting from an observable price change pursuant to ASC 321, Investments–Equity Securities.
Investment income during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 primarily reflects carry fund appreciation of 11%, 41%, and 10%, respectively, which resulted primarilyin significantly higher performance allocations in 2021 relative to 2022 and 2020, as discussed below. Investment loss from our equity method investment in Carlyle FRL during the year ended December 31, 2022 includes an investment loss of $176.9 million which was recorded as a significant transactionresult of the dilution in our indirect ownership in Fortitude from 19.9% to 13.5% in connection with the initial drawdown of the Fortitude capital raise. The year ended December 31, 2020 also includes a loss in principal investment income (loss) of $620.7 million related to onethe contribution of our 19.9% interest in Fortitude to Carlyle FRL, at which time we began accounting for our investment under the equity method based on our net asset value in the fund. As of December 31, 2022, our investment in Carlyle FRL was $646.0 million, relative to our cost of $389.4 million. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our equity method investment in Carlyle FRL and the Control Transaction.
Our investment in NGP entitles us to 55% of the management fee-related revenue of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP Energy Funds and is subject to impairment under the U.S. buyout fundsGAAP accounting for equity method investments. We evaluate our equity method investment in 2016.NGP for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable, but no less than quarterly. For example, challenges with fundraising or lower future management fees could cause an impairment of our investment in NGP in the future. As of December 31, 2022, we continue to believe that our investment in NGP is not impaired.

We recorded a decrease in investment income from CLOs during the year ended December 31, 2022 relative to the comparable period in 2021. The fair value of the CLO investments held by the firm (before the effects of consolidation) decreased 24% in 2022, with our investments in subordinated notes depreciating 37% and our investments in the senior notes depreciating 13% during 2022.
109






Performance Fees.Allocations. Performance fees increased $1,342.1 millionallocations decreased $4.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172022 compared to 20162021 and decreased $73.1 millionincreased $4.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. Performance feesallocations by segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 comprised the following:
120



Year Ended December 31,

201720162015

(Dollars in Millions)
Corporate Private Equity$1,629.6
$289.6
$698.2
Real Assets265.2
321.1
49.3
Global Credit56.6
37.4
(41.0)
Investment Solutions142.5
103.7
118.4
Total performance fees$2,093.9
$751.8
$824.9




Total carry fund appreciation20%12%12%
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,098.3 $5,223.2 $1,440.5 
Global Credit24.0 156.6 21.5 
Global Investment Solutions(1)
205.2 704.8 173.9 
Total performance allocations$1,327.5 $6,084.6 $1,635.9 
Total carry fund appreciation11%41%10%
Approximately $1,273.2 million(1) The Company’s primary and secondary investments in external funds are generally valued based on its proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. As a result, amounts presented may not include the impact of economic activity in the current quarter.
Refer to “—Key Financial Measures” for a listing of the funds with performance allocations in excess of 10% of the total for the periods presented.
The year 2022 was characterized by high inflation, significant market volatility, rapidly tightening financial conditions, a surge in the U.S. dollar against most currencies, and weakening fundamentals across the globe. Estimates of S&P 500 constituents’ earnings growth for 2022 were steadily marked down throughout the year, and currently stand at 4.6% in 2022. The Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq 100 fell 8.8%, 19.4 %, and 33%, respectively, in 2022. Globally, the MSCI ACWI, EuroStoxx 600, and Shanghai Composite fell 19.8%, 12.9%, and 15.1%, respectively, over the same period. Our carry fund portfolio continued to reflect the impact of the broader macroeconomic environment in the fourth quarter but outperformed the global equity markets for the year. Within our performance feesGlobal Private Equity segment, our corporate private equity funds appreciated 1% in the fourth quarter and 6% for the year, ended December 31, 2017 were related to CP VI, CAP IV and CP V, while approximately $214.2 million of our performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 were related to CP V and CRP VII, and approximately $422.1 million of our performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 were related to CEP III, CAP III, CRP VI, and Energy III.
Expectations for global economic growth remained strong through the fourth quarter of 2017. Further, our proprietary portfolio of industrial and manufacturing related indicators remained steady at or near six-year highsreal estate funds depreciated 1% during the fourth quarter and appreciated 16% for the year. Our infrastructure and natural resources funds appreciated 2% during the fourth quarter and appreciated 48% for the year. Global Credit carry funds, which represent approximately 11% of 2017. As inflation continues to fall short of central bank targets, stronger real global growth, relatively low longer-term interest rates, and the passage of tax reform pushed global equity markets to record highs in 2017 and early 2018. The MSCI World Index advanced 20% in 2017 and 5%total Global Credit remaining fair value, appreciated 2% in the fourth quarter alone, whileand 3% for the S&P 500 rose 19% over the calendar year and 6%year. Global Investment Solutions funds depreciated 3% in the fourth quarter but appreciated 6% for the year, however excluding the impact of 2017. Underlying earnings growth at the companies comprising the S&P 500 has supported the upward movementforeign currency translation of the markets. Further,USD-denominated investments in December 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This bill is a pro-growth, pro-business package designed to stimulate growthour EUR-based funds, our Global Investment Solutions were flat in the economy. Althoughfourth quarter, and experienced 4% appreciation for the majorityyear. The valuations of our current U.S. portfolio companies, we expect the benefitprimary and secondary funds of funds generally reflect investment fair values on a lower corporate tax rate will outweigh any limitations on interest expense deductibility, we will continue to evaluate the provisions of the Act for any further potential impact. Most of our U.S. portfolio companies have reasonable capital structures, are growing earningsone-quarter lag.
Interest and benefit from low interest rates. We anticipate this bill generally should be a net positive for our carry fund portfolio. During 2017, our overall carry fund portfolio appreciated 20%. Our Corporate Private Equity funds appreciated by 32%, our Real Asset funds appreciated by 19%, our Global Credit funds appreciated by 11% and our dollar denominated appreciation in Investment Solutions was 10% for 2017. With market valuation levels at all-time highs, increasing volatility and the potential for upward movement in interest rates, it will be difficult for the public markets to generate the same level of appreciation in 2018 as observed in 2017 and, accordingly, it will be difficult for our portfolio to do the same as well.
For the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, significant events in the global political landscape, including the results of the United States Presidential election, the vote on the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom and the populist movement more broadly, introduced macroeconomic and political uncertainty for the United States and the global economy. However, since the United States Presidential election in early November 2016 until early 2017, global stocks rose more than 7%, on average, alongside an approximate 70 basis point increase in 5- and 10-year Treasury yields. In addition to increasing uncertainty, the general rebound in commodities prices during 2016 had far-reaching effects as the rebound caused inflationary pressures to re-emerge across the global economy. While this rebound in commodities prices, including those in oil and industrial metals, generally has benefited our energyOther Income. Interest and other commodities-related investments, both the actual increase in inflation and the perception and expectation of continuingincome increased inflation led to a relatively sizable increase in U.S. Treasury yields in the second half of 2016. The U.S. Federal Reserve raised its target for short-term interest rates by 25 basis points in December 2016, which followed a similar rate hike in December 2015. Rising rates also put upward pressure on property yields (cap rates), which depressed the market value of some categories of real estate in the latter part of 2016.
In addition, performance fees from consolidated funds increased $2.2$45.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021 and performance fees from consolidated funds decreased $33.2increased $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015. These fees eliminate upon consolidation.

110






Investment Income. Investment income increased $71.5 million2020. The increase for the year ended December 31, 20172022 was primarily due to an increase in the reimbursement of certain costs incurred on behalf of Carlyle funds, as comparedwell as interest income from investments in CLO senior notes, due in part to 2016,the CBAM acquisition, and increased $145.3 millioninterest income on corporate treasury investments. The increase for the year ended December 31, 20162021 was primarily as compared to 2015, primarily due toa result of an increase in the following:reimbursement of certain costs incurred on behalf of Carlyle funds.

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Increase in investment income from NGP, which includes performance fees
from the investments in NGP
$103.1
$113.0
Investment loss related to NGP contingent consideration
(See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements)
(37.6)(9.6)
Increase in investment income from our buyout and growth funds10.8
32.5
Decrease (increase) in losses on foreign currency hedges4.6
(6.5)
(Decrease) increase in investment income from our real assets funds, excluding NGP(14.9)10.7
Decrease (increase) in investment loss from our distressed debt funds, former
hedge funds, and energy mezzanine funds
4.0
(1.6)
(Decrease) increase in investment income from our CLOs(6.7)10.4
All other changes8.2
(3.6)
Total increase in investment income$71.5
$145.3
Interest and Other Income of Consolidated Funds. Our CLOs generate interest income primarily from investments in bonds and loans inclusive of amortization of discounts and generate other income from consent and amendment fees. Substantially all interest and other income of the CLOs and other consolidated funds together with interest expense of our CLOs and net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds is attributable to the related funds’ limited partners or CLO investors and therefore is allocated to non-controlling interests.investors. Accordingly, such amounts have no material impact on net income attributable to the Partnership.Company.
Interest and other income of consolidated funds increased $10.8$57.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and decreased $808.6increased $26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015. The following table provides explanations2020. Substantially all of the changesvariance in interest and other income of consolidated fundsConsolidated Funds for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:both periods relates to interest income from CLOs.

121



Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
   Increase (decrease) in interest and other income from CLOs$28.1
$(636.2)
   Decrease in interest and dividend income from consolidated
AlpInvest funds and vehicles

(69.5)
   Decrease in interest and dividend income from consolidated
hedge funds

(120.3)
   (Decrease) increase in other income from other consolidated
funds
(17.3)17.4
   Total increase (decrease) in interest and other income of
Consolidated Funds
$10.8
$(808.6)
Expenses


Revenue of a Real Estate VIE. Revenue of a real estate VIE was $109.0 millionTotal expenses decreased $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to $95.1 million in 20162021, and $86.8 million in 2015. The increase in revenue of the real estate VIEincreased $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to 2016 and 2016 as compared to 2015 is primarily due to an increase in the number of land development projects completed in 2017, prior to deconsolidation, and 2016, respectively, as compared to 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 15 for more information on the deconsolidation of the real estate VIE.


111






Expenses

Total expenses increased $390.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016, and decreased $1,226.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the changes in total expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Total Expenses, prior year$4,757.1 $2,333.3 
Increases (Decreases):
(Decrease) increase in total compensation and benefits(2,106.2)2,298.4 
Increase in general, administrative and other expenses144.1 82.4 
(Decrease) increase in interest(2.9)19.3 
Increase in interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds33.1 15.0 
(Decrease) increase in other non-operating expense(0.5)8.7 
Total (decrease) increase(1,932.4)2,423.8 
Total Expenses, current year$2,824.7 $4,757.1 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Total Expenses, prior year$2,242.1
$3,468.4
Increases (Decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in total compensation and benefits626.5
(186.3)
   Decrease in general, administrative and other expenses(244.3)(191.7)
   Increase (decrease) in interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds69.1
(910.8)
   (Decrease) increase in interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and
loss on deconsolidation
(5.1)63.0
   Increase in other non-operating income(60.2)(3.8)
   All other changes4.2
3.3
   Total increase (decrease)390.2
(1,226.3)
Total Expenses, current year$2,632.3
$2,242.1


Total Compensation and Benefits. Total compensation and benefits increased $626.5 milliondecreased $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and decreased $186.3 millionincreased $2.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, due to the following:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Increase in cash-based compensation and benefits$144.0 $58.4 
(Decrease) increase in equity-based compensation(9.1)58.1 
(Decrease) increase in performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation(2,241.1)2,181.9 
Total (decrease) increase in total compensation and benefits$(2,106.2)$2,298.4 
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 (Dollars in Millions)
Increase in base compensation$5.6
$14.9
Decrease in equity-based compensation(14.3)(43.4)
Increase (decrease) in performance fee related compensation635.2
(157.8)
Total increase (decrease) in total compensation and benefits$626.5
$(186.3)
   
BaseCash-based compensation and benefits. Basebenefits. Cash-based compensation and benefits increased $5.6$144.0 million, or 1%16%, for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and increased $14.9$58.4 million, or 2%7%, for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, primarily due to the following:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Increase in headcount and bonuses$73.4 $81.0 
(Decrease) increase in compensation expense associated with contingent earn-out payments(1)
70.6 (22.6)
Total increase in base compensation and benefits$144.0 $58.4 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Decrease in hedge fund headcount and bonuses$(24.9)$
Decrease in all other headcount and bonuses(14.7)(40.7)
Increase (decrease) in compensation costs associated with
fundraising activities
30.4
(7.2)
Absence in 2017 of prior year net write-down of acquisition-related
compensatory arrangements
14.8

Higher expense associated with acquisition-related compensatory arrangements1

62.8
Total increase in base compensation and benefits$5.6
$14.9
1 Included in base compensation and benefits for the year ended(1) The Carlyle Aviation Partners acquisition included an earn-out of up to $150.0 million, under which we have paid $53.6 million through December 31, 2016 is approximately $25.0 million2022. The Abingworth acquisition included an earn-out of up to $130.0 million. For additional compensation expense as part of the transaction associated with Claren Road in which we transferred our 63%information, refer to “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contingent Cash Payments For Business Acquisitions and Strategic Investments.”

112






ownership interest in Claren Road to its founders (see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on this transaction).
Equity-based compensation.compensation. Equity-based compensation, net of forfeitures, decreased $14.3$9.1 million, or 4%6%, for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016.2021. The decrease in equity-based compensation from 20162021 to 20172022 was due primarily driven by fewer performance-based restricted stock units expected to the forfeiture of equity-based awards duevest based on 2022 performance compared to employee terminations occurring in since 2016 and the accounting policy change on January 1, 2017 to account for forfeitures as they occur instead of estimating an expense at the grant date. These decreases were2021, partially offset by $10 million of expense related to the settlementmodification of certain restricted stock awards in connection with the DGAM earnout agreementdeparture of our former chief executive officer. On February 1, 2023, we granted a total of 9.9 million restricted stock units to our personnel, including certain senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel. In addition, on February 15, 2023, we
122


will grant performance- and time-based inducement equity awards in connection with the appointment of our new Chief Executive Officer. As a result of these grants, and combined with a higher share price than in prior periods, we expect that equity-based compensation expense will be higher in the coming years than it has been.
The increase in equity-based compensation from 2020 to 2021 was primarily due to the commencementexpanded use of equity-based compensation incentive programs as well as a forfeiture credit recorded in 2020 related to the retirement of one of our co-chief executive officers. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we granted 7.1 million long-term strategic restricted stock units to certain senior professionals, the majority of which are eligible to vest based on the achievement of annual performance targets over four years, with a larger proportion of the wind down of DGAM in 2016 in which a reduction ofawards eligible to vest based on the 2024 performance year.
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation expense was incurred in 2016. Performance allocations and by the ongoing granting of deferred restricted common units to new and existing employees during 2016 and 2017.
Equity-basedincentive fee related compensation expense decreased $43.4 million, or 11%,$2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162022 as compared to 2015. The decrease in equity-based compensation from 2015 to 2016 was due primarily to the settlement of the DGAM earnout agreement due to the wind down of DGAM in 2016, the reversal of an acquisition earnout, the forfeitures of equity-based awards due to employee terminations,2021 and the absence in 2016 of a $7.5 million cumulative catch-up expense recorded in 2015 associated with a change in the estimated forfeiture rates in 2015. These decreases were partially offset by the ongoing granting of deferred restricted common units to new and existing employees during 2015 and 2016.
Performance fee related compensation expense. Performance fee related compensation expense increased $635.2 million$2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 20172021 as compared to 20162020. Performance allocations and decreased $157.8 millionincentive fee related compensation as a percentage of performance allocations and incentive fee was 52%, 48%, and 47% for the yearyears ended December 31, 20162022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation as compareda percentage of performance allocations and incentive fees fluctuates depending on the mix of funds contributing to 2015. Performanceperformance allocations and incentive fees in a given period. For our largest segment, Global Private Equity, our performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation expense as a percentage of performance allocations and incentive fees was 47%, 47%, and 62% in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The overall percentage of 62% for the year ended December 31, 2015 is primarily due togenerally around 45%. Performance allocations from our private equity funds and vehicles in ourGlobal Investment Solutions segment (which pay a higher ratio of performance allocations and incentive fees as compensation) andcompensation, primarily as a result of the effectterms of our Legacy Energy funds inacquisition of AlpInvest (see “—Key Financial Measures—Revenues—Investment Income” for more information regarding the terms of our Real Assets segment (which had carry reversals during the year without the corresponding reversal of performance fee compensation expense because the investment teams for the Legacy Energy funds are employed by Riverstone and not Carlyle)acquisition). Performance fees earned from the Legacy Energy funds are allocated solely to Carlyle and are not otherwise shared or allocated with our investment professionals. For our largest segment, Corporate Private Equity, our performance fee related compensation expense as a percentage of performance fees is generally around 45%.
General, Administrative and Other Expenses. General, administrative and other expenses decreased $244.3increased $144.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and decreased $191.7increased $82.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, primarily due to:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Higher (lower) intangible asset amortization(1)
$93.7 $(4.4)
Higher depreciation and amortization1.7 4.3 
Higher (lower) professional fees48.3 (5.4)
Higher (lower) travel and conference costs29.2 (2.9)
Higher external fundraising costs7.8 2.0 
Higher (lower) IT and other office expenses18.8 (1.1)
Higher rent expense0.7 7.7 
Foreign exchange adjustments(2)
(38.7)21.9 
Right-of-use asset impairment (3)
(26.8)26.8 
CCC litigation cost recovery in 2020(4)
— 29.9 
Other changes(5)
9.4 3.6 
Total increase in general, administrative and other expenses$144.1 $82.4 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Absence in 2016 of intangible asset impairment losses in 2015$
$(220.3)
Lower intangible asset amortization(32.3)(33.8)
(Lower) higher expenses for litigation and contingencies *(56.2)125.8
Net insurance proceeds recognized for certain legal matters(187.6)(25.0)
(Lower) higher professional fees and office expenses(5.8)9.8
Higher (lower) external fundraising costs6.0
(16.2)
Foreign exchange adjustments and other changes31.6
(32.0)
Total decrease in general, administrative and other expenses$(244.3)$(191.7)
* For(1)    Intangible asset amortization increase for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2021 was primarily related to the CBAM and Abingworth acquisitions. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
(2)    Foreign exchange adjustments are primarily driven by the revaluation on our European CLO investments. Foreign exchange adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2016, this reflects2021 also include a loss of $14.7 million from the $175sale of our local Brazilian management entity related to amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
(3)     In connection with the April 1, 2021 sale of MRE, we entered into a sublease of certain office space in New York which resulted in a $26.8 million 2016 commodities charges as compared toright-of-use asset impairment charge.
(4)    General, administrative and other expenses in 2020 included the $25positive impact of a $29.9 million reversalrecovery of the CCC litigation reserve and $144 million of commodities charges in 2017.costs. See Note 98 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 to the 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(5) The year ended December 31, 2022 includes $7.5 million in advances to a portfolio company which have been fully reserved as an expense until recovered.
Interest. Interest decreased $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021 primarily due to lower interest accruals on the 3.875% Senior Notes, which were redeemed in November 2021, and interest expense of $10.1 million recorded in 2021 upon their early extinguishment. These impacts were partially offset by higher interest on CLO
123


term loans, mainly related to CBAM, and higher interest accruals on the Subordinated Notes issued in May 2021. Interest increased $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily due to interest accrued on the Subordinated Notes, as well as $10.1 million of interest expense recorded upon the early extinguishment of the 3.875% Senior Notes in November 2021. These increases were partially offset by lower interest accruals on the 3.875% Senior Notes. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our legal matters.information.
Interest and Other Expenses of Consolidated Funds. Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds increased $69.1$33.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, and decreased $910.8increased $15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 is2020, primarily due to higher interest expense on the consolidated CLOs. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 is primarily due to lower interest expense on the consolidated CLOs and the absence in 2016 of interest and other expenses of hedge funds and AlpInvest funds and vehicles that were deconsolidated on January 1, 2016.

113






The CLOs incur interest expense on their loans payable and incur other expenses consisting of trustee fees, rating agency fees and professional fees. Substantially all interest and other income of our CLOs together with interest expense of our CLOs and net investment gains of Consolidated Funds is attributable to the related funds’ limited partners or CLO investors and therefore is allocated to non-controlling interests.investors. Accordingly, such amounts have no material impact on net income attributable to the Partnership.Company.
Interest and Other Expenses of a Real Estate VIE and Loss on Deconsolidation. Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation decreased $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and increased $63.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015, primarily due to:

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Higher (lower) expenses associated with land development
services
$33.1
$(17.2)
Higher (lower) expenses related to fair market value adjustment
for Urbplan loans
11.0
(26.8)
(Lower) higher interest expense(32.9)10.5
Lower compensation and benefits(5.7)(2.2)
(Lower) higher general, administrative and other expenses,
primarily due to asset impairments and litigation reserves
(75.1)98.7
Loss on deconsolidation *64.5

Total (decrease) increase in interest and other expenses of a real
estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation
$(5.1)$63.0
* During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership recognized a loss of approximately $65 million as a result of the Partnership disposing of its interests in Urbplan in a transaction in which a third party acquired operational control and all of the economic interests in Urbplan. With this transaction, Urbplan has been deconsolidated from the Partnership's financial results (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements).
Other Non-operating Income.Expenses (Income). For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, this caption includes a loss on the sale of our local Brazilian management entity and related transaction costs of $4.7 million and a $5.0 million gain on the sale of our interest in MRE. For the year ended December 31, 2020, this caption includes the impact of the newly enacted tax reform legislationConversion on our tax receivable agreement liability, which was reduced by $71.5$9.3 million. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for more informationin Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on the newly enacted tax reform legislation. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, this caption primarily represents the change in the fair value of contingent consideration associated with the Partnership's acquisitions.
The increase in other non-operating incomeForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 is primarily due to2020 for information regarding the $71.5 million reduction in the tax receivable agreement liability as mentioned above, the resultimpact of the separation from ESG and Claren Road and the associated termination of their respective earnout arrangements, and the change in fair value of contingent consideration associated with the Partnership's other acquisitions.Conversion.
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the overall estimated fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Partnership’s acquisitions decreased based on management's assumptions in the probability-weighted discounted cash flow models used to estimate the fair value of these contingent consideration arrangements at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as well as the separation from ESG and Claren Road and the associated decrease in value of their respective earnout arrangements.


114







Net Investment Gains (Losses) of Consolidated Funds.Funds
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 net investment (losses) gains of Consolidated Funds was $88.4$(41.5) million, $13.1$2.5 million, and $864.4$(21.3) million, respectively. For periods prior to January 1, 2016, this activity is predominantly driven by our consolidated AlpInvest funds and vehicles, CLOs, and hedge funds. On January 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted new consolidation accounting guidance that allowed the Partnership to deconsolidate the AlpInvest funds and vehicles, hedge funds, and the majorityrespectively, comprised of its CLOs. As a result, beginning with the year ended December 31, 2016, net investment gains only comprise the activity of the remaining consolidated CLOs and certain other funds. For the consolidated CLOs, the amount reflects the net gain or loss on the fair value adjustment of both the assets and liabilities. The components of net investment gains of consolidated funds for the respective periods are:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Realized (losses) gains$(29.6)$9.6 $(91.3)
Net change in unrealized (losses) gains(378.5)67.0 62.2 
Total (losses) gains(408.1)76.6 (29.1)
Gains (losses) from liabilities of CLOs366.6 (74.1)7.8 
Total net investment (losses) gains of Consolidated Funds$(41.5)$2.5 $(21.3)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Realized (losses) gains$(54.0) $(33.4) $1,114.7
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)81.0
 85.1
 (688.5)
Total gains27.0
 51.7
 426.2
Gains (losses) on liabilities of CLOs61.4
 (40.5) 436.5
Gains on other assets of CLOs
 1.9
 1.7
Total investment gains of Consolidated Funds$88.4
 $13.1
 $864.4
For periods prior to January 1, 2016, the unrealized investment gains/losses include the appreciation/depreciation of the equity investments within the consolidated AlpInvest funds and vehicles, the appreciation/depreciation of CLO investments in loans and bonds, as well as the appreciation/depreciation of investments made by our consolidated hedge funds and other consolidated funds. The gains/losses on the liabilities of the CLOs reflect the fair value adjustment on the debt of the CLOs. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the unrealized investment gains/losses primarily include the appreciation/depreciation of consolidated CLO investments in loans and bonds.Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The net investment gainsprovision (benefit) for income taxes was $287.8 million, $982.3 million and $197.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015 were2020, respectively, with effective tax rates of 18.3%, 24.4% and 34.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 is primarily comprised of the 21% U.S. federal corporate income tax rate plus U.S. state and foreign corporate income taxes, partially offset by non-controlling interests and the impact of a tax benefit resulting from the vesting of restricted stock units. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2022 also differs from the statutory rate due to the following:use of foreign tax credits, a lower estimated state effective tax rate due to the mix of income during the year, and a benefit due to a restructuring of ownership in our Global Investment Solutions business. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2020 also differs from the statutory rate due to the income tax expense resulting from the Conversion (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for information regarding the impact of the Conversion). Excluding this impact from Conversion, our effective income tax rate would have been approximately 19% for the year ended December 31, 2020.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had federal, state, local and foreign taxes payable of $39.7 million and $93.3 million, respectively, which is recorded as a component of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
124


Year Ended December 31,

201720162015

(Dollars in Millions)
Gains attributable to the consolidated AlpInvest funds and
vehicles
$
$
$978.8
Losses attributable to the consolidated hedge funds

(138.4)
Gains (losses) attributable to other consolidated funds19.9
(0.1)(10.1)
Net appreciation of CLOs68.5
13.2
34.1
Total net investment gains$88.4
$13.1
$864.4

Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities was $72.5$59.7 million, $41.0$70.5 million, and $537.9$34.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. These amounts are primarily attributable to the net earnings of the Consolidated Funds for each period, which are substantially all allocated to the related funds’ limited partners or CLO investors, as well as net earnings from our Insurance Solutions business allocated to certain third party investors. This balance also includesThe net income (loss) of our Consolidated Funds, after eliminations, was $36.1 million, $2.7 million, and $8.1 million for the allocation of Urbplan's net losses that areyears ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Net income attributable to non-controlling interests andin consolidated entities also includes net income attributable to non-controlling interests in carried interest, giveback obligations, and cash held for carried interest distributions.

115






The net income of our Consolidated Funds, after eliminations, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is comprised of the following:

Year Ended December 31,

201720162015

(Dollars in Millions)
Net income from the consolidated AlpInvest funds and
vehicles
$
$
$861.9
Net loss from the consolidated hedge funds

(185.9)
Net income (loss) from the consolidated CLOs
0.1
(54.3)
Net income from other consolidated funds12.0
17.0
14.6
Total net income of our Consolidated Funds, after eliminations$12.0
$17.1
$636.3
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. Common UnitholdersStockholders
The net income (loss) attributable to the The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. common unitholdersstockholders was $238.1 million, $6.4 million,$1.2 billion, $3.0 billion, and $(18.4)$348.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. The Partnership is allocated a portion of the monthly net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings based on the Partnership’s ownership in Carlyle Holdings (which was approximately 30%, 26%, and 25% as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively). Net income or loss attributable to the Partnership also includes 100% of the net income or loss attributable to the Partnership's wholly owned taxable subsidiary, Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc., which was $(30.3) million, $17.8 million, and $29.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As a result, the total net income or loss attributable to the Partnership will vary as a percentage of the net income or loss attributable to Carlyle Holdings.
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders per basic common unit was $2.58, $0.08, and $(0.24) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders per diluted common unit was $2.38, $(0.08), and $(0.30) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For purposes of the diluted earnings per common unit calculation, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, Carlyle Holdings partnership units are assumed to have converted to common units of the Partnership and therefore, substantially all of the net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings is attributable to the Partnership resulting in a diluted loss per common unit.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following tables set forth information in the format used by management when making resource deployment decisions and in assessing performance of our segments. These non-GAAP financial measures are presented for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015. The tables below show our total segment Economic Income which is the sum of Fee Related Earnings, Net Performance Fees, Investment Income (Loss), Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies, Net interest and Equity-based compensation expense (excluding equity-based compensation grants issued in May 2012 upon the completion of the initial public offering or grants issued in acquisitions or strategic investments).2020. Our Non-GAAP financial measures exclude the effects of unrealized performance allocations net of related compensation expense, unrealized principal investment income, consolidated funds, acquisition-relatedacquisition-and disposition-related items including amortization and any impairment charges of lease right-of-use assets or acquired intangible assets and contingent consideration taking the form of earn-outs, charges associated with equity-based compensation, grants issued in May 2012 upon completion of the initial public offering or grants issued in acquisitions or strategic investments, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, corporate actions and infrequently occurring or unusual events.

116






The following table shows our total segment Economic Income,Distributable Earnings, or “DE,” and Fee Related Earnings, and Distributable Earningsor “FRE,” for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020.
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Total Segment Revenues$4,401.4 $4,950.1 $2,289.5 
Total Segment Expenses2,492.4 2,706.4 1,527.4 
(=) Distributable Earnings$1,909.0 $2,243.7 $762.1 
(-) Realized Net Performance Revenues998.5 1,529.6 246.3 
(-) Realized Principal Investment Income150.6 209.5 73.0 
(+) Net Interest74.5 93.5 76.9 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$834.4 $598.1 $519.7 
125

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Total Segment Revenues$3,378.8
 $1,958.6
 $2,132.4
Total Segment Expenses2,109.5
 1,652.7
 1,735.8
Economic Income$1,269.3
 $305.9
 $396.6
(-) Net Performance Fees1,177.8
 393.7
 391.7
(-) Investment Income (Loss)47.2
 50.3
 (22.4)
(+) Equity-based Compensation123.9
 119.6
 121.5
(+) Net Interest48.8
 51.1
 53.3
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies(25.0) 
 50.0
(=) Fee Related Earnings$192.0
 $32.6
 $252.1
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees552.6
 625.3
 788.5
(+) Realized Investment Income (Loss)(25.8) 44.9
 (64.8)
(+) Net Interest(48.8) (51.1) (53.3)
(=) Distributable Earnings$670.0
 $651.7
 $922.5

The following table sets forth our total segment revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020.

Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$1,996.9 $1,654.6 $1,523.3 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other111.1 97.0 56.9 
Fee related performance revenues129.3 43.2 35.9 
Total fund level fee revenues2,237.3 1,794.8 1,616.1 
Realized performance revenues1,980.7 2,938.6 586.1 
Realized principal investment income150.6 209.5 73.0 
Interest income32.8 7.2 14.3 
Total Segment Revenues$4,401.4 $4,950.1 $2,289.5 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues     
Fund level fee revenues     
Fund management fees$1,081.0
 $1,085.8
 $1,197.9
Portfolio advisory fees, net16.7
 16.6
 15.4
Transaction fees, net26.9
 31.2
 9.8
Total fund level fee revenues1,124.6
 1,133.6
 1,223.1
Performance fees     
Realized1,085.3
 1,215.8
 1,434.8
Unrealized1,089.6
 (464.1) (525.1)
Total performance fees2,174.9
 751.7
 909.7
Investment income (loss)     
Realized(25.8) 44.9
 (64.8)
Unrealized73.0
 5.4
 42.4
Total investment income (loss)47.2
 50.3
 (22.4)
Interest income16.7
 10.2
 4.8
Other income15.4
 12.8
 17.2
Total Segment Revenues$3,378.8
 $1,958.6
 $2,132.4


117







The following table sets forth our total segment expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020.

Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits$994.2 $891.5 $821.5 
Realized performance revenues related compensation982.2 1,409.0 339.8 
Total compensation and benefits1,976.4 2,300.5 1,161.3 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses369.8 267.6 241.4 
Depreciation and amortization expense38.9 37.6 33.5 
Interest expense107.3 100.7 91.2 
Total Segment Expenses$2,492.4 $2,706.4 $1,527.4 

126


 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Expenses     
Compensation and benefits     
Direct base compensation$464.5
 $437.1
 $477.7
Indirect base compensation193.5
 164.2
 172.1
Equity-based compensation123.9
 119.6
 121.5
Performance fee related     
Realized532.7
 590.5
 646.3
Unrealized464.4
 (232.5) (128.3)
Total compensation and benefits1,779.0
 1,078.9
 1,289.3
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses233.9
 483.5
 362.8
Depreciation and amortization expense31.1
 29.0
 25.6
Interest expense65.5
 61.3
 58.1
Total Segment Expenses$2,109.5
 $1,652.7
 $1,735.8

Income before provision for income taxes is the U.S. GAAP financial measure most comparable to economic income, fee related earnings,Distributable Earnings and distributable earnings.Fee Related Earnings. The following table is a reconciliation of income before provision for income taxes to economicDistributable Earnings and to Fee Related Earnings.
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Income before provision for income taxes$1,572.5 $4,027.5 $580.0 
Adjustments:
Net unrealized performance revenues(183.7)(1,606.2)(598.7)
Unrealized principal investment (income) loss(1)
38.3 (351.8)556.2 
Principal investment loss from dilution of indirect investment in Fortitude176.9 — — 
Adjusted unrealized principal investment (income) loss from direct investment in Fortitude(2)
— — 104.4 
Equity-based compensation(3)
161.9 172.9 116.6 
Acquisition related charges, including amortization of intangibles and impairment187.4 37.7 38.1 
Tax expense associated with certain foreign performance revenues3.0 (17.1)(7.9)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(59.7)(70.5)(34.6)
Right-of-use asset impairment— 26.8 — 
Debt extinguishment costs— 10.2 — 
Other adjustments, including severance and Conversion costs in 202012.4 14.2 8.0 
Distributable Earnings1,909.0 2,243.7 762.1 
Realized net performance revenues, net of related compensation(4)
998.5 1,529.6 246.3 
Realized principal investment income(4)
150.6 209.5 73.0 
Net interest74.5 93.5 76.9 
Fee Related Earnings$834.4 $598.1 $519.7 
(1)    Adjustments to unrealized principal investment income (loss) during the year ended December 31, 2020 are inclusive of $211.8 million of unrealized gains resulting from changes in the fair value of embedded derivatives related to certain reinsurance contracts included in Fortitude’s U.S. GAAP financial statements prior to the contribution of our investment in Fortitude to Carlyle FRL on June 2, 2020. At the time of the contribution of our investment to Carlyle FRL, we began accounting for our investment under the equity method based on our net asset value in the fund, which is an investment company that accounts for its investment in Fortitude at fair value. This resulted in an unrealized loss in principal investment income (loss) of $620.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.
(2)    Adjusted unrealized principal investment income (loss) from the investment in Fortitude represents 19.9% of Fortitude’s estimated net income (loss), excluding the unrealized gains (losses) related to embedded derivatives, prior to the contribution of our investment in Fortitude to Carlyle FRL on June 2, 2020.
(3)    Equity-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 includes amounts presented in principal investment income and general, administrative and other expenses in our U.S. GAAP statement of operations.
127


(4)     See reconciliation to most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure below:
 Year Ended December 31, 2022
 Carlyle
Consolidated
Adjustments(5)
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance revenues$1,327.5 $653.2 $1,980.7 
Performance revenues related compensation expense719.9 262.3 982.2 
Net performance revenues$607.6 $390.9 $998.5 
Principal investment income (loss)$570.5 $(419.9)$150.6 
 Year Ended December 31, 2021
 Carlyle
Consolidated
Adjustments(5)
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance revenues$6,084.6 $(3,146.0)$2,938.6 
Performance revenues related compensation expense2,961.0 (1,552.0)1,409.0 
Net performance revenues$3,123.6 $(1,594.0)$1,529.6 
Principal investment income (loss)$637.3 $(427.8)$209.5 
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
 Carlyle
Consolidated
Adjustments(5)
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance revenues$1,635.9 $(1,049.8)$586.1 
Performance revenues related compensation expense779.1 (439.3)339.8 
Net performance revenues$856.8 $(610.5)$246.3 
Principal investment income (loss)$(540.7)$613.7 $73.0 
(5)    Adjustments to performance revenues and principal investment income (loss) relate to (i) unrealized performance allocations net of related compensation expense and unrealized principal investment income, which are excluded from the Non-GAAP results, (ii) amounts earned from the Consolidated Funds, which are eliminated in the U.S. GAAP consolidation but are included in the Non-GAAP results, (iii) amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, which are excluded from the Non-GAAP results, (iv) the reclassification of NGP performance revenues, which are included in principal investment income in the U.S. GAAP financial statements, (v) the reclassification of fee related performance revenues, which are included in fund level fee revenues in the Non-GAAP results, and (vi) the reclassification of tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance revenues. Adjustments to principal investment income (loss) also include the reclassification of earnings for the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates to distributable earnings.the appropriate operating captions for the Non-GAAP results, and the exclusion of charges associated with the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates that are excluded from the Non-GAAP results, and the exclusion of the principal investment loss from the dilution of the indirect investment in Fortitude (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements).
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Income before provision for income taxes$1,132.3
 $45.3
 $402.2
Adjustments:     
Equity-based compensation issued in conjunction with the initial public offering, acquisitions and strategic investments241.2
 223.4
 259.8
Acquisition related charges and amortization of intangibles and impairment35.7
 94.2
 288.8
Other non-operating (income) expense(1)
(71.4) (11.2) (7.4)
Tax expense associated with performance fee compensation(9.2) (15.1) (14.9)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(72.5) (41.0) (537.9)
Severance and other adjustments13.2
 10.3
 6.0
Economic Income$1,269.3
 $305.9
 $396.6
Net performance fees(2)
1,177.8
 393.7
 391.7
Investment income (loss)(2)
47.2
 50.3
 (22.4)
Equity-based compensation123.9
 119.6
 121.5
Net Interest48.8
 51.1
 53.3
Reserve for litigation and contingencies(25.0) 
 50.0
Fee Related Earnings$192.0
 $32.6
 $252.1
Realized performance fees, net of related compensation552.6
 625.3
 788.5
Realized investment income (loss)(2)
(25.8) 44.9
 (64.8)
Net Interest(48.8) (51.1) (53.3)
Distributable Earnings$670.0
 $651.7
 $922.5

118






(1)Included in other non-operating (income) expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 is a $71.5 million adjustment for the revaluation of the tax receivable agreement liability as result of the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

(2)See reconciliation to most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure below:
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Carlyle
Consolidated
 
Adjustments(3)
 
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance fees     
Realized$1,097.3
 $(12.0) $1,085.3
Unrealized996.6
 93.0
 1,089.6
Total performance fees2,093.9
 81.0
 2,174.9
Performance fee related compensation expense     
Realized520.7
 12.0
 532.7
Unrealized467.6
 (3.2) 464.4
Total performance fee related compensation expense988.3
 8.8
 997.1
Net performance fees     
Realized576.6
 (24.0) 552.6
Unrealized529.0
 96.2
 625.2
Total net performance fees$1,105.6
 $72.2
 $1,177.8
Investment income (loss)     
Realized$70.4
 $(96.2) $(25.8)
Unrealized161.6
 (88.6) 73.0
Total investment income (loss)$232.0
 $(184.8) $47.2
      
 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Carlyle
Consolidated
 
Adjustments(3)
 
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance fees     
Realized$1,129.5
 $86.3
 $1,215.8
Unrealized(377.7) (86.4) (464.1)
Total performance fees751.8
 (0.1) 751.7
Performance fee related compensation expense     
Realized580.5
 10.0
 590.5
Unrealized(227.4) (5.1) (232.5)
Total performance fee related compensation expense353.1
 4.9
 358.0
Net performance fees     
Realized549.0
 76.3
 625.3
Unrealized(150.3) (81.3) (231.6)
Total net performance fees$398.7
 $(5.0) $393.7
Investment income (loss)     
Realized$112.9
 $(68.0) $44.9
Unrealized47.6
 (42.2) 5.4
Total investment income (loss)$160.5
 $(110.2) $50.3

119






 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Carlyle
Consolidated
 
Adjustments(3)
 
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance fees     
Realized$1,441.9
 $(7.1) $1,434.8
Unrealized(617.0) 91.9
 (525.1)
Total performance fees824.9
 84.8
 909.7
Performance fee related compensation expense     
Realized650.5
 (4.2) 646.3
Unrealized(139.6) 11.3
 (128.3)
Total performance fee related compensation expense510.9
 7.1
 518.0
Net performance fees     
Realized791.4
 (2.9) 788.5
Unrealized(477.4) 80.6
 (396.8)
Total net performance fees$314.0
 $77.7
 $391.7
Investment income     
Realized$32.9
 $(97.7) $(64.8)
Unrealized(17.7) 60.1
 42.4
Total investment income$15.2
 $(37.6) $(22.4)
(3)Adjustments to performance fees and investment income (loss) relate to (i) amounts earned from the Consolidated Funds, which were eliminated in the U.S. GAAP consolidation but were included in the Non-GAAP results, (ii) amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, which were excluded from the Non-GAAP results, (iii) the reclassification of NGP performance fees, which are included in investment income in the U.S. GAAP financial statements, and (iv) the reclassification of certain tax expenses associated with performance fees. Adjustments to investment income (loss) also include the reclassification of earnings for the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates to the appropriate operating captions for the Non-GAAP results, the exclusion of charges associated with the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates that are excluded from the Non-GAAP results, and adjustments to reflect the Partnership's share of Urbplan net losses, until Urbplan was deconsolidated during 2017, as investment losses for the Non-GAAP results. Adjustments are also included in these financial statement captions to reflect the Partnership's economic interests in Claren Road (through January 2017), ESG (through June 2016) and Vermillion.

120






Economic Income and Distributable Earnings for our reportable segments areis as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,505.6 $2,021.9 $604.5 
Global Credit315.5 119.7 116.2 
Global Investment Solutions87.9 102.1 41.4 
Total$1,909.0 $2,243.7 $762.1 

128
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Economic Income (Loss)     
Corporate Private Equity$895.9
 $224.2
 $399.5
Real Assets215.4
 216.5
 32.9
Global Credit106.7
 (159.1) (40.3)
Investment Solutions51.3
 24.3
 4.5
Economic Income$1,269.3
 $305.9
 $396.6
Distributable Earnings     
Corporate Private Equity$487.9
 $739.4
 $798.0
Real Assets24.8
 49.3
 72.8
Global Credit126.9
 (157.4) 38.8
Investment Solutions30.4
 20.4
 12.9
Distributable Earnings$670.0
 $651.7
 $922.5


Segment Analysis
Discussed below is our DE FRE, and EIFRE for our segments for the periods presented. Our segment information is reflected in the manner used by our senior management to make operating and compensation decisions, assess performance and allocate resources.
For segment reporting purposes, revenues and expenses are presented on a basis that deconsolidates our Consolidated Funds. As a result, segment revenues from management fees, realized performance feesrevenues and realized principal investment income (loss) are different than those presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis because fund management feesthese revenues recognized in certain segments are received from Consolidated Funds and are eliminated in consolidation when presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis. Furthermore, segment expenses are different than related amounts presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis due to the exclusion of fund expenses that are paid by the Consolidated Funds. Segment revenue and expenses are also different than those presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis because we present our segment revenues and expenses related to Claren Road, ESG, and, for periods prior to July 1, 2015, Vermillion based on our economic interest in those entities. Beginning in July 2015 in connection with the departure of certain Vermillion principals and the restructuring of its operations, our economic interests were increased in stages to currently 88% (to the extent Vermillion exceeds certain performance hurdles). Otherwise, our economic interest, and share of management fees of Vermillion, is 100%. Effective January 1, 2016 and through January 31, 2017 (the date we transferred our ownership interests to its principals), our segment revenue and expenses related to Claren Road are based on our approximate 63% economic interest in that entity as a result of a reallocation of interest from a departing founder. Further, our economic interest in ESG was 55% through June 30, 2016. Also, EI excludes expenses associated with equity-based compensation that was issued in our initial public offering or issued in acquisitions and strategic investments.






121
129







CorporateGlobal Private Equity
For purposes of presenting our results of operations for this segment, our earnings from our investments in NGP are presented in the respective operating captions. The following table presents our results of operations for our CorporateGlobal Private Equity(1) segment:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$1,300.9 $1,111.8 $1,042.0 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other29.5 34.3 22.8 
Fee related performance revenues69.4 — — 
Total fund level fee revenues1,399.8 1,146.1 1,064.8 
Realized performance revenues1,656.6 2,757.8 404.5 
Realized principal investment income108.7 167.8 52.0 
Interest income14.9 1.4 3.3 
Total revenues3,180.0 4,073.1 1,524.6 
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits598.3 546.2 501.9 
Realized performance revenues related compensation751.5 1,243.6 183.0 
Total compensation and benefits1,349.8 1,789.8 684.9 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses235.3 172.5 157.9 
Depreciation and amortization expense25.6 25.1 22.0 
Interest expense63.7 63.8 55.3 
Total expenses1,674.4 2,051.2 920.1 
(=) Distributable Earnings$1,505.6 $2,021.9 $604.5 
(-) Realized Net Performance Revenues905.1 1,514.2 221.5 
(-) Realized Principal Investment Income108.7 167.8 52.0 
(+) Net Interest48.8 62.4 52.0 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$540.6 $402.3 $383.0 
(1) On August 31, 2021, we sold 100% of our interest in our local Brazilian management entity and entered into a sub-advisory agreement with the acquiring company, which will provide advisory services with respect to Carlyle’s Brazilian portfolio. The loss on the sale and related transaction costs of $4.7 million and foreign currency translation loss of $14.7 million are not included in DE or FRE. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for the reconciliation of Total DE and FRE to the U.S. GAAP financial statements.

130
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues     
Fund level fee revenues     
Fund management fees$471.0
 $498.9
 $577.4
Portfolio advisory fees, net15.2
 14.5
 14.3
Transaction fees, net22.4
 31.2
 7.7
Total fund level fee revenues508.6
 544.6
 599.4
Performance fees
 
 
Realized831.5
 1,060.5
 1,209.5
Unrealized781.6
 (777.5) (523.1)
Total performance fees1,613.1
 283.0
 686.4
Investment income (loss)
 
 
Realized25.4
 60.3
 23.3
Unrealized37.0
 (11.0) (5.2)
Total investment income62.4
 49.3
 18.1
Interest income5.5
 3.4
 1.5
Other income6.0
 6.0
 9.8
Total revenues2,195.6
 886.3
 1,315.2
Segment Expenses
 
 
Compensation and benefits
 
 
Direct base compensation235.7
 210.8
 224.2
Indirect base compensation105.0
 78.8
 91.5
Equity-based compensation60.5
 69.3
 65.1
Performance fee related
 
 
Realized372.9
 472.1
 540.9
Unrealized362.6
 (342.6) (221.7)
Total compensation and benefits1,136.7
 488.4
 700.0
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses119.8
 131.9
 172.4
Depreciation and amortization expense15.3
 13.6
 12.5
Interest expense27.9
 28.2
 30.8
Total expenses1,299.7
 662.1
 915.7
Economic Income$895.9
 $224.2
 $399.5
(-) Net Performance Fees877.6
 153.5
 367.2
(-) Investment Income62.4
 49.3
 18.1
(+) Equity-based Compensation60.5
 69.3
 65.1
(+) Net Interest22.4
 24.8
 29.3
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies(12.5) 
 26.8
(=) Fee Related Earnings$26.3
 $115.5
 $135.4
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees458.6
 588.4
 668.6
(+) Realized Investment Income25.4
 60.3
 23.3
(+) Net Interest(22.4) (24.8) (29.3)
(=) Distributable Earnings$487.9
 $739.4
 $798.0


122







Year Ended December 31, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162021 and Year Ended December 31, 20162021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20152020


Distributable Earnings
Distributable earnings decreased $251.5$516.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and decreased $58.6 millionincreased $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the changes in distributable earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$2,021.9 $604.5 
Increases (decreases):
Increase in fee related earnings138.3 19.3 
(Decrease) increase in realized net performance revenues(609.1)1,292.7 
(Decrease) increase in realized principal investment income(59.1)115.8 
Decrease (increase) in net interest13.6 (10.4)
Total (decrease) increase(516.3)1,417.4 
Distributable earnings, current year$1,505.6 $2,021.9 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$739.4
$798.0
Increases (decreases):  
   Decrease in realized net performance fees(129.8)(80.2)
   (Decrease) increase in realized investment income(34.9)37.0
   Decrease in fee related earnings(89.2)(19.9)
   Decrease in net interest2.4
4.5
   Total decrease(251.5)(58.6)
Distributable earnings, current year$487.9
$739.4


Realized Net Performance Fees. Revenues. Realized net performance feesrevenues decreased $129.8$609.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, primarily driven by lower realization activity in our U.S. buyout and decreased $80.2 millionU.S. real estate funds, partially offset by higher realizations in our Europe buyout. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we realized performance revenues for the first time on our fourth Europe buyout and fourth Europe Technology funds.

Realized net performance revenues increased $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015. Our prior generations of carry2020, primarily driven by realization activity in our U.S., Europe and Asia buyout funds, have exited substantial parts of their portfolios, andas well as our newer funds, while accruing carry, are not yet producing cash carry. Net realized performance fees declined in 2017 as realized proceeds from our funds declined to $11.2 billion from $14.8 billion in 2016. Specifically, the decrease in realized net performance fees forU.S. real estate funds. During the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 was due to lower2021 we realized performance fee realizations fromrevenues for the first time on our Europe buyout funds, and to a lesser extenteighth U.S. real estate fund, our U.S. buyout funds, partially offset by larger realizations from ourfourth Asia buyout funds in 2017 as compared to 2016. We expect net realized performance fees to decrease in 2018 as compared to 2017 levels, primarily due to the mix of realized proceeds coming from funds not yet taking cash carry, even though we expect that those funds will still be accruing carry.fund, and our third Japan buyout fund.     

The decrease in realized net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to lower performance fee realizations in 2016, primarily with our Asia buyout funds, as compared to 2015.    Realized net performance feesrevenues were primarily generated by the following funds for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively:
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
CP VCP VCP IV
CP VICP VICP V
CEOF IICEP IIICP VI
CGFSP IICAP IIICETP III
CEP IVCAP IVCGFSP I
CAP IVCETP IIICGFSP II
CJP IIICRP VCRP III
CETP IVCRP VIICRP VII
CRP VIIICRP VIIICERF
CJP IIICEREP III
CGFSP IICCI
Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
CP VCP VCP V
CGFSP ICEP IIICEP III
CAP IIICP IVCP IV
CEP IIICEP IICAP II
CETP IICGFSP ICAP III

CETP II 

CAP III 

Realized Principal Investment Income. Realized principal investment income decreased $34.9$59.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 and increased $37.0$115.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The decrease in realized principal investment income for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 was primarily due to lowerdriven by decreases in realized gains inprincipal investment income from our investments in U.S. buyout, U.S. real estate and Europe buyoutU.S. growth funds, partially offset by an increase in realized gains on U.S. growth funds in 2017 as compared to realized losses on these funds in 2016. principal investment income from our NGP Energy funds.
131


The increase in realized principal investment income for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 20152020 was primarily driven by increases in realized principal investment income from our investments in U.S. buyout and Europe buyoutU.S. real estate funds, as well as our Europe buyout and U.S. growth funds.

123







Fee Related Earnings

Fee related earnings decreased $89.2increased $138.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and decreased $19.9increased $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the change in fee related earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:

Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$402.3 $383.0 
Increases (decreases):
Increase in fee revenues253.7 81.3 
Increase in cash-based compensation(52.1)(44.3)
Increase in general, administrative and other indirect expenses(62.8)(14.6)
  All other changes(0.5)(3.1)
Total increase138.3 19.3 
Fee related earnings, current year$540.6 $402.3 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$115.5
$135.4
Increases (decreases):  
   Decrease in fee revenues(36.0)(54.8)
   (Increase) decrease in direct and indirect base
compensation
(51.1)26.1
   (Increase) decrease in general, administrative and
other expenses
(0.4)13.7
   All other changes(1.7)(4.9)
   Total decrease(89.2)(19.9)
Fee related earnings, current year$26.3
$115.5
Fee Revenues. Total fee revenues decreased $36.0increased $253.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 and decreased $54.8increased $81.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, due to the following:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Higher fund management fees$189.1 $69.8 
(Lower) higher portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other(4.8)11.5 
Higher fee related performance revenues69.4 — 
Total increase in fee revenues$253.7 $81.3 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Lower fund management fees$(27.9)$(78.5)
(Lower) higher transaction fees(8.8)23.5
Higher portfolio advisory fees0.7
0.2
Total decrease in fee revenues$(36.0)$(54.8)
The decreaseincrease in fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 was primarily due to the activation of management fees on CETP V in the current year and CP VIII and CRP IX in the fourth quarter of the prior year, as well as management fees from Abingworth which was acquired in August 2022 and $9.1 million of catch-up management fees, primarily related to CP VIII. These increases were partially offset by the basis step-down in CP VII and CRP VIII and lower assets under management from sales of investments during 2016 forfees on CP V, our first financial services fund (“CGFSP I”), our third Europe buyout fund (“CEP III”), and our second Asia buyout fund (“CAP II”). ManagementVI, on which management fees in 2017 do not benefit from $18 billion of pending AUM for which we have not yet activated the funds and turnedare based on fees.invested capital.
The decreaseincrease in fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015 is2020 was primarily due to a $48.6activation of management fees on CP VIII, CRP IX, CAP Growth II and CP Growth during the current year, as well as higher management fees from CJP IV, CPI, and CRSEF, which included $3.2 million decrease in catch-up management fees. These increases were partially offset by basis step-downs in CJP III and CEOF II, as well as lower management fees from $49.1on CP VI and CEP IV, on which management fees are based on invested capital and which have had realizations over the last twelve months. CIEP II also had a decrease in management fees, driven by catch-up management fees of $6.6 million in 2015 to $0.5 million2020.
The increase in 2016. Catch-up management feesfee related performance revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 were primarily2022 as compared to 2021 was driven by a subsequent closing for our second U.S. equity opportunity fund (“CEOF II”). Catch-up management fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 were primarily driven by subsequent closings for our fourth Europe buyout fund (“CEP IV”), our third Japan buyout fund (“CJP III”), and our third Europe technology fund (“CETP III”). Furthermore, fund management fees decreased in 2016 dueCPI, which began to the reduction in basis resulting from realizations in several large funds outside the investment period, including CP V and CAP III, totaling approximately $58.6 million. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $28.7 million of management fees from CEOF II due to 2016 beingrealize recurring fee related performance revenue during the first full yearquarter of management fees from that fund.2022.
The weighted average management fee rate increased from 1.28%to 1.39% at December 31, 2016 to 1.31%2022 from 1.26% at December 31, 2017. The increase in the weighted average management2021, reflecting new funds raised with higher fee rate is driven by significant exit activity in funds outside the investment period, which typically earn lower effective fee rates, whilerates. Fee-earning AUM for funds inside the investment period ticked up slightly. Fee-earning AUM was $35.6increased $3.5 billion and $36.3to $107.8 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, reflecting a decrease2022 from $104.3 billion as of $0.7 billion.December 31, 2021.
132


The weighted average management fee rate slightly increased fromto 1.26% at December 31, 2015 to 1.28%2021 from 1.25% at December 31, 2016. The increase in the weighted average management fee rate is driven by significant exit activity in funds outside the investment period, which typically earn lower effective fee rates, while2020. Fee-earning AUM for funds inside the investment

124






period remained relatively flat. Fee-earning AUM was $36.3increased $12.7 billion and $40.9to $104.3 billion as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, reflecting a decrease2021 from $91.6 billion as of $4.6 billion.December 31, 2020.
    
The decrease in    Portfolio advisory and transaction fees decreased for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, and the increase in transaction feesincreased for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015 was2020. The recognition of portfolio advisory and transaction fees can be volatile as they are primarily from a significantgenerated by investment in one ofactivity within our U.S. buyout funds, in 2016.and therefore are impacted by our investment pace.


DirectCash-based compensation and indirectbenefits expense. Cash-based compensation expense. Direct and indirect compensationbenefits expense increased $51.1$52.1 million, or 18%10%, for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to higher compensation costs related to fundraising activities for CP VII and CAP V of approximately $30.1 million, increased headcount, andas well as an increase in 2017 cash bonuses.

Direct and indirect compensation expense decreased $26.1associated with fee related performance revenues (approximately 45% of fee related performance revenues are paid as cash-based compensation) of $33.1 million or 8%, for the year ended December 31, 20162022. Cash-based compensation and benefits expense increased $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2015,2020, primarily due to lower compensation costs related to fundraising activities of approximately $11.7 million and lower cash bonuses in 2016. These increases were partially offset by a slight increase in headcount.higher year-end bonuses.
General, administrative and other indirect expenses. General, administrative and other indirect expenses increased $0.4$62.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher negative foreign currency adjustments and real estate costs, partially offset by lowerincreased professional fees, travel and a $1.7 million decrease inconference expenses, IT expenses and external costs associated with fundraising activities inactivities. General, administrative and other indirect expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172022 also include $7.5 million in advances to a portfolio company which have been fully reserved as compared to 2016.an expense until recovered.
General, administrative and other indirect expenses decreased $13.7$5.7 million, excluding the impact of litigation cost recoveries in 2020, for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015 primarily due to $13.9 million of lower external costs associated with fundraising activities in 2016 as compared to 2015 and lower information technology expenses. These decreases were partially offset by higher professional fees.
Economic Income
Economic income increased $671.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and decreased $175.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The following table provides the components of the change in economic income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Economic income, prior year$224.2
$399.5
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in net performance fees724.1
(213.7)
   Increase in investment income13.1
31.2
   Decrease (increase) in equity-based compensation8.8
(4.2)
   Decrease in fee related earnings(89.2)(19.9)
   Decrease in net interest2.4
4.5
   Decrease in reserve for litigation and contingencies12.5
26.8
   Total increase (decrease)671.7
(175.3)
Economic income, current year$895.9
$224.2

125






Performance Fees. Performance fees (realized and unrealized) increased $1,330.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 and decreased $403.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher appreciation on certain of our U.S., Europe, and Asia buyout funds. The decrease in performance fees for 2016 as compared to 2015 is2020, primarily due to lower fund appreciation from our buyout and growth capital funds. Performance fees are from the following types of funds:professional fees.

 Performance Fees
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Buyout funds$1,570.1
 $298.8
 $636.7
Growth Capital funds43.0
 (15.8) 49.7
Total performance fees$1,613.1
 $283.0
 $686.4

The $1,613.1 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CP VI of $649.1 million,
CAP IV of $312.7 million,
CP V of $309.5 million,
CEP III of $76.8 million,
CEP IV of $69.8 million,
CGFSP II of $55.5 million,
CETP III of $33.6 million,
CETP II of $31.6 million, and
CGFSP I of $30.3 million.

The $283.0 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CP V of $124.3 million,
CEP III of $46.8 million,
CP VI of $37.4 million,
CEP II of $32.5 million,
CGFSP of $27.9 million,
CBPF of $24.7 million,
CAP III of $(33.8) million, and
CEOF of $(21.0) million.
The $686.4 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CEP III of $235.9 million,
CAP III of $184.2 million,
CP V of $67.9 million,
CP IV of $44.4 million, and
CGFSP I of $40.7 million.

Performance fees of $1,613.1 million, $283.0 million, and $686.4 million are inclusive of performance fees reversed of approximately $56.2 million, $86.6 million, and $12.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership paid $98.4 million to satisfy giveback obligations related to Energy II and Energy III. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Partnership paid $47.3 million to satisfy a giveback obligation related to our second Asia buyout fund (“CAP II”). Substantially all of the giveback obligations were paid by current and former senior Carlyle professionals.


126






The appreciation in remaining value of assets for this segment by type of fund are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

201720162015
Buyout funds34%12%13%
Growth Capital funds23%3%14%
Total32%11%13%

Net performance fees as a percentage of total performance fees are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

201720162015

(Dollars in millions)
Net Performance Fees$877.6$153.5$367.2

   
Percentage of Total Performance Fees54%54%53%

Unrealized performance fees reflect the difference between total performance fees and realized performance fees. The recognition of realized performance fees results in a reversal of accumulated unrealized performance fees, generally resulting in minimal impact on total performance fees. Because unrealized performance fees are reversed upon a realization event, in periods where the Partnership generates significant realized performance fees unrealized performance fees can be negative even in periods of portfolio appreciation.

Total Investment Income. Total investment income (realized and unrealized) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $62.4 million compared to investment income of $49.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in total investment income from 2016 to 2017 relates primarily to appreciation in our investments in our U.S. and Europe buyout funds in 2017 as compared to depreciation in our investments in these buyout funds in 2016. Further contributing to the increase in total investment income was higher appreciation on investments in our Asia buyout funds in 2017 as compared to 2016. These increases to total investment income were partially offset by lower realized gains in our investments in the U.S. and Europe buyout funds as well as our investments in Europe growth funds in 2017 as compared to 2016.

Total investment income (realized and unrealized) for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $49.3 million compared to investment income of $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in total investment income from 2015 to 2016 relates primarily to higher realized gains on investments in the U.S. and Europe buyout funds as well as appreciation on investments in the Asia buyout funds for 2016 as compared to depreciation on investments in these Asia buyout funds for 2015. These increases were offset by unrealized losses on foreign currency hedges and depreciation on investments in our Europe buyout funds.
Equity-based Compensation. Equity-based compensation was $60.5 million, $69.3 million, and $65.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies. Corporate Private Equity's share of the reserve for litigation and contingencies decreased $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily related to Corporate Private Equity's share of the $25 million reserve reversal related to the CCC litigation recognized in 2017. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the CCC litigation. Corporate Private Equity had recognized its share of a $50 million reserve for litigation and contingencies for $26.8 million in 2015.


127






Fee-earning AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20172022
Fee-earning AUM is presented below for each period together with the components of change during each respective period.
The table below breaks out Fee-earning AUM by its respective components at each period.
As of December 31,
As of December 31, 202220212020
2017 2016 2015 (Dollars in millions)
(Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity     
Global Private EquityGlobal Private Equity
Components of Fee-earning AUM (1)     
Components of Fee-earning AUM(1)
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$25,809
 $25,390
 $25,438
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$55,227 $50,523 $55,937 
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital7,675
 9,377
 13,647
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital42,028 46,701 30,129 
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset valueFee-earning AUM based on net asset value6,188 4,584 3,208 
Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other2,100
 1,560
 1,841
Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other4,358 2,444 2,297 
Total Fee-earning AUM$35,584
 $36,327
 $40,926
Total Fee-earning AUM$107,801 $104,252 $91,571 
Weighted Average Management Fee Rates (2)   
Weighted Average Management Fee Rates(2)
All Funds1.31% 1.28% 1.26%All Funds1.39 %1.26 %1.25 %
Funds in Investment Period1.44% 1.41% 1.43%Funds in Investment Period1.41 %1.34 %1.37 %
 
(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Represents the aggregate effective management fee rate of each fund in the segment, weighted by each fund’s Fee-earning AUM, as of the end of each period presented.
(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Represents the aggregate effective management fee rate of each fund in the segment, weighted by each fund’s Fee-earning AUM, as of the end of each period presented.
133


The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Fee-earning AUM.
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$104,252 $91,571 $94,811 
Inflows(1)
12,983 24,588 5,400 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(8,306)(10,925)(9,514)
Market Activity & Other(3)
61 289 (306)
Foreign Exchange(4)
(1,189)(1,271)1,180 
Balance, End of Period$107,801 $104,252 $91,571 
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity     
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$36,327
 $40,926
 $40,249
Inflows, including Fee-paying Commitments (1)2,086
 1,171
 6,425
Outflows, including Distributions (2)(3,692) (5,460) (4,854)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (3)31
 (220) (267)
Foreign Exchange and other (4)832
 (90) (627)
Balance, End of Period$35,584
 $36,327
 $40,926


(1)Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period, and the fee-earning commitments invested in vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital. Inflows for the year ended December 31, 2022 include $2 billion of Fee-earning AUM associated with the Abingworth transaction in August 2022. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM.
(1)Inflows represent limited partner capital raised and capital invested by carry funds outside the original investment period. Inflows do not include funds raised of $18.3 billion, which are not yet earning fees.
(2)Outflows represent distributions from funds outside the investment period and changes in fee basis for our carry funds where the original investment period has expired.
(3)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value.
(4)Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of period end.
(2)Outflows represents the impact of realizations from vehicles with management fees based on remaining invested capital at cost or fair value, changes in basis for funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired during the period, reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees, and gross redemptions in open-ended vehicles with management fees based on net asset value. Realizations for funds earning management fees based on commitments during the period do not affect Fee-earning AUM.
(3)Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value.
(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
Fee-earning AUM was $35.6$107.8 billion at December 31, 2017, a decrease2022, an increase of $0.7$3.5 billion, or 2%3%, compared to $36.3$104.3 billion at December 31, 2016.2021. This was driven by outflows of $3.7 billion which were principally a result of distributions from CP V and other buyout funds outside of their investment period. This decrease was partially offset by inflows of $2.1$13.0 billion primarily related to equity invested by CGP which charges managementnew fee-paying commitments raised in CETP V and CP VIII, new capital deployment in CPI, and $2 billion acquired as part of the Abingworth transaction in August 2022. Partially offsetting the increase were realizations of $8.3 billion in funds that charge fees based on invested capital as well well as new fee-paying commitments raisedand $1.2 billion in CGFSP III. Also offsetting the decrease were $0.8 billion ofnegative foreign exchange gainsactivity primarily from the

128






translation of our Euro-denominated Europe buyout and growth fundsEUR-denominated funds’ AUM to USD for reporting purposes.USD. Investment and distribution activity by funds still in the investment period does not impact Fee-earning AUM as these funds are based on commitments.
Fee-earning AUM was $36.3$104.3 billion at December 31, 2016, a decrease2021, an increase of $4.6$12.7 billion, or 11%14%, compared to $40.9$91.6 billion at December 31, 2015.2020. This was driven by inflows of $24.6 billion primarily related to the activation of management fees in CP VIII, CRP IX, and CP Growth, as well as capital invested in CPI. Partially offsetting the increase were outflows of $10.9 billion from the step-down of management fees in CP VII and CRP VIII and distributions in other funds outside of their investment period. Negative foreign exchange activity of $1.3 billion resulted from the translation of our Europe buyout, growth, and real estate AUM from EUR to USD.
Fee-earning AUM was $91.6 billion at December 31, 2020, a decrease of $3.2 billion, or 3%, compared to $94.8 billion at December 31, 2019. This was driven by outflows of $5.5$9.5 billion which were principally a result of dispositions in our U.S. Buyout, NGP Energy, and Legacy Energy funds, as well as distributions from CP V, CEP III, andin other buyout funds outside of their investment period. This decrease was partially offset by inflows of $1.2$5.4 billion primarily related to equity invested by CGP which charges management fees based on invested capital.
Fee-earning AUM was $40.9 billion at December 31, 2015, an increase of $0.7 billion, or 2%, compared to $40.2 billion at December 31, 2014. Inflows of $6.4 billion were primarily related to limited partner commitments raised by CEP IV, CJP III, and the activation of management fees in CJP IV, subscriptions in CPI, and new fee-paying commitments raised in CEOF II. Thisvarious other funds. Also offsetting the decrease was offset by outflows of $4.9 billion which were principally a result of distributions from several buyout funds that were outside of their investment period, in addition to the reduction in management fee basis from commitments to invested equity for funds at the end of their original investment period and $0.6 billion inpositive foreign exchange loss.activity of $1.2 billion from the translation of our Europe Buyout, Growth, and Real Estate AUM from EUR to USD.
134


Total AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20172022
The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Total AUM.

 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity
Total AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$162,117 $131,780 $129,784 
Inflows(1)
12,391 27,199 3,550 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(22,086)(27,819)(9,589)
Market Activity & Other(3)
12,554 32,730 6,412 
Foreign Exchange(4)
(1,878)(1,773)1,623 
Balance, End of Period$163,098 $162,117 $131,780 
(1)Inflows reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing. Inflows for the year ended December 31, 2022 include $2 billion of AUM associated with the August 2022 Abingworth transaction.
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity     
Total AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$50,864
 $63,144
 $64,668
New Commitments (1)20,544
 818
 8,164
Outflows (2)(9,377) (12,910) (12,812)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (3)9,668
 3,226
 5,358
Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) (4)1,145
 (25) (1,377)
Other (5)(286) (3,389) (857)
Balance, End of Period$72,558
 $50,864
 $63,144
(2)Outflows includes distributions net of recallable or recyclable amounts in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, gross redemptions in our open-end funds, and the expiration of available capital.
(3)Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value.

(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(1)
New Commitments reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing.
(2)Outflows includes distributions in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles and separately managed accounts.
(3)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles and separately managed accounts.
(4)
Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(5)Includes expiring available capital, the impact of capital calls for fees and expenses and other changes in AUM.
Total AUM was $72.6$163.1 billion at December 31, 2017,2022, an increase of $21.7$1.0 billion, or 43%1%, compared to $50.9$162.1 billion at December 31, 2016.2021. Driving the increase were $12.6 billion of portfolio appreciation and $12.4 billion of inflows, largely attributable to additional capital raised in CETP V and CP VIII, as well as $2 billion of AUM acquired as part of the Abingworth transaction in August 2022. Overall portfolio appreciation was driven by appreciation of $2.9 billion in NGP XI, $1.8 billion in NGP XII, and $1.1 billion in CRP VIII, partially offset by depreciation of $2.4 billion in CP VI. The increase was largely offset by outflows of $22.1 billion primarily from distributions of investment proceeds in our U.S. Buyout, NGP Energy, Europe Buyout, Asia Buyout, and U.S. Real Estate funds, as well as $1.9 billion of negative foreign exchange activity primarily from the translation of our EUR-denominated funds’ AUM to USD.
Total AUM was $162.1 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $30.3 billion, or 23%, compared to $131.8 billion at December 31, 2020. This increase was driven by $20.5$27.2 billion of new commitmentsinflows primarily due to fundraising in CP VII, CAP V,VIII, CRP IX, CPI, and CGFSP III. Also contributing to this increase was marketCP Growth, as well as portfolio appreciation of $9.7$32.7 billion. The carry funds driving appreciation for the period included $2.8$7.3 billion attributable to CP VI, $3.7 billion attributable to CP VII, $1.9 billion attributable to CEP IV, and $1.7 billion attributable to CP V, and $1.5 billion attributable to CAP IV. Partially offsetting theCRP VIII. The increase were $9.4was partially offset by $27.8 billion of outflows driven primarily byfrom distributions and the expiration of dry powder in CP V, CEP III,our U.S. Buyout, U.S. Real Estate, and various other buyout funds.Europe Buyout funds, and $(1.8) billion in foreign exchange activity primarily from the translation of our Europe Buyout, Growth, and Real Estate AUM from EUR to USD.
Total AUM was $50.9$131.8 billion at December 31, 2016, a decrease2020, an increase of $12.2$2.0 billion, or 19%2%, compared to $63.1$129.8 billion at December 31, 2015.2019. This decreaseincrease was driven by $12.9$3.6 billion of outflowsinflows primarily due to fundraising in our large prior vintage buyout funds and $3.4 billion of other activity, primarily related to the expiration of available capital in CP V, CJPCPI, CIEP II, and CEP III. Partially

129






offsettingCJP IV. Also contributing to this decreaseincrease was marketportfolio appreciation of $3.2$6.4 billion. The carry funds driving appreciation for the period included $1.4$6.1 billion attributable to CP VI, $0.7$1.3 billion attributable to CAP IV, and $0.8 billion attributable to CP V, and $0.5VII, offset by $(1.0) billion attributable to CAP IV.
Total AUM was $63.1NGP XI and $(0.5) billion at December 31, 2015, a decreaseattributable to CIEP I. The increase of $1.6 billion or 2%, compared to $64.7 billion at December 31, 2014. This decreasein foreign exchange activity was primarily driven by outflowsfrom the translation of $12.8 billionour Europe Buyout, Growth, and $1.4Real Estate AUM from EUR to USD. Partially offsetting the increase were $9.6 billion of foreign exchange loss. Offsetting this were $8.2 billion of new commitmentsoutflows driven primarily by fundraising in CEP IV, CEOF II, CGP, CJP III and other funds and coinvestment vehicles and $5.4 billion of market appreciation, representing a 13% increasedistributions in our portfolio of carry funds for the period. The carry funds driving appreciation for the period included $1.3 billion attributable to CEP III, $1.0 billion attributable to CAP III,U.S. Buyout, Asia Buyout and $0.4 billion attributable to CP V.U.S. Real Estate funds.
Fund Performance Metrics
Fund performance information for our investment funds that generally have at least $1.0 billion in capital commitments, cumulative equity invested or total value as of December 31, 2017,2022, which we refer to as our “significant funds,”
135


is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund return information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns. See “ItemPart I. Item 1A. Risk Factors — “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations — Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common units.stock.


130






The following tables reflect the performance of our significant funds in our CorporateGlobal Private Equity business. See “ItemPart I. Item 1. Business — “Business—Our Family of Funds”Global Investment Offerings” for a legend of the fund acronyms listed below.
136
     TOTAL INVESTMENTS REALIZED/PARTIALLY REALIZED INVESTMENTS(5)
     As of December 31, 2017As of December 31, 2017
 Fund Inception Date (1) 
Committed
Capital
 
Cumulative
Invested
Capital (2)
 
Total
Fair
Value (3)
 MOIC(4) Gross IRR (7)(12) Net IRR (8)(12) 
Cumulative
Invested
Capital(2)
 
Total
Fair
Value(3)
 MOIC(4) 
Gross
IRR(7)
Corporate Private Equity(Reported in Local Currency, in Millions) (Reported in Local Currency, in Millions)
Fully Invested/Committed Funds (6)                  
CP II10/1994 $1,331.1
 $1,362.4
 $4,072.2
 3.0x 34% 25% $1,362.4
 $4,072.2
 3.0x 34%
CP III2/2000 $3,912.7
 $4,031.6
 $10,146.9
 2.5x 27% 21% $4,031.6
 $10,146.9
 2.5x 27%
CP IV12/2004 $7,850.0
 $7,612.6
 $17,937.9
 2.4x 16% 13% $7,612.6
 $17,937.9
 2.4x 16%
CP V5/2007 $13,719.7
 $13,190.9
 $27,362.9
 2.1x 18% 14% $9,350.8
 $24,962.3
 2.7x 26%
CEP I12/1997 1,003.6
 981.6
 2,126.5
 2.2x 18% 11% 981.6
 2,126.5
 2.2x 18%
CEP II9/2003 1,805.4
 2,048.4
 4,122.3
 2.0x 36% 20% 1,883.8
 4,106.8
 2.2x 43%
CEP III12/2006 5,294.9
 5,116.1
 11,572.3
 2.3x 19% 14% 4,284.4
 10,419.8
 2.4x 20%
CAP I12/1998 $750.0
 $627.7
 $2,521.8
 4.0x 25% 18% $627.7
 $2,521.8
 4.0x 25%
CAP II2/2006 $1,810.0
 $1,628.2
 $3,051.5
 1.9x 11% 8% $1,628.2
 $3,051.5
 1.9x 11%
CAP III5/2008 $2,551.6
 $2,543.2
 $4,817.2
 1.9x 18% 12% $2,071.8
 $4,380.2
 2.1x 20%
CJP I10/2001 ¥50,000.0
 ¥47,291.4
 ¥138,902.1
 2.9x 61% 37% ¥47,291.4
 ¥138,902.1
 2.9x 61%
CJP II7/2006 ¥165,600.0
 ¥141,866.7
 ¥216,622.1
 1.5x 8% 4% ¥126,166.7
 ¥191,642.2
 1.5x 7%
CGFSP I9/2008 $1,100.2
 $1,080.7
 $2,462.1
 2.3x 20% 14% $977.9
 $2,318.7
 2.4x 22%
CGFSP II4/2013 $1,000.0
 $897.2
 $1,320.5
 1.5x 24%
 15%
 $193.2
 $407.3
 2.1x 32%
CEOF I5/2011 $1,119.1
 $1,164.5
 $1,569.6
 1.3x 12% 8% $346.9
 $827.7
 2.4x 38%
CETP II2/2007 521.6
 437.4
 1,253.6
 2.9x 28% 19% 278.8
 1,140.8
 4.1x 36%
CAGP IV6/2008 $1,041.4
 $954.1
 $1,459.9
 1.5x 12% 7% $502.1
 $928.6
 1.8x 16%
All Other Funds (9)Various 
 $4,655.4
 $7,220.2
 1.6x 16% 7% $3,747.5
 $6,048.6
 1.6x 17%
Co-investments and Other (10)Various 
 $11,040.3
 $24,964.7
 2.3x 36% 33% $6,998.2
 $20,778.0
 3.0x 36%
Total Fully Invested/Committed Funds $62,787.0
 $134,994.5
 2.2x 26% 19% $49,921.3
 $122,707.5
 2.5x 27%
Funds in the Investment Period(6)                  
CP VI5/2012 $13,000.0
 $11,753.9
 $16,265.3
 1.4x 20%
 13%
 
 
 
 
CEP IV8/2013 3,669.5
 3,074.2
 3,720.3
 1.2x 18%
 7%
 

 

 
 

CAP IV11/2012 $3,880.4
 $3,184.1
 $5,206.6
 1.6x 31%
 20%
 
 
 
 
CGP12/2014 $3,588.0
 $2,668.7
 $2,795.1
 1.0x 5%
 4%
 
 
 
 
CJP III8/2013 ¥119,505.1
 ¥60,094.5
 ¥105,936.6
 1.8x NM
 NM
 
 
 
 
CEOF II3/2015 $2,400.0
 $1,150.1
 $1,332.4
 1.2x NM
 NM
 
 
 
 
All Other Funds (11)Various 
 $1,385.1
 $1,822.4
 1.3x NM
 NM
 
 
 
 
Total Funds in the Investment Period $24,371.2
 $32,834.9
 1.3x 21% 12% $1,391.0
 $3,731.1
 2.7x 58%
TOTAL CORPORATE PRIVATE EQUITY (13) $87,158.2
 $167,829.4
 1.9x 26% 18% $51,312.2
 $126,438.7
 2.5x 27%
(1)The data presented herein that provides “inception to date” performance results of our segments relates to the period following the formation of the first fund within each segment. For our Corporate Private Equity segment our first fund was formed in 1990.
(2)Represents the original cost of all capital called for investments since inception of the fund.
(3)Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(4)Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(5)An investment is considered realized when the investment fund has completely exited, and ceases to own an interest in, the investment. An investment is considered partially realized when the total amount of proceeds received in respect of such investment, including dividends, interest or other distributions and/or return of capital, represents at least 85% of invested capital and such investment is not yet fully realized. Because part of our value creation strategy involves pursuing best exit alternatives, we believe information regarding Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR, when considered together with the other investment performance metrics presented, provides investors with meaningful

131







TOTAL INVESTMENTSREALIZED/PARTIALLY REALIZED INVESTMENTS (5)
 As of December 31, 2022As of December 31, 2022
Fund (Fee Initiation Date/Stepdown Date) (19)Committed
Capital (20)
Cumulative
Invested
Capital (1)
Percent InvestedRealized
Value (2)
Remaining Fair Value (3)MOIC (4)Gross IRR (6)(12)Net IRR (7)(12)Net Accrued Carry/(Giveback) (8)Total
Fair
Value (9)
MOIC (4)Gross
IRR (6)(12)
Corporate Private Equity
CP VIII (Oct 2021 / Oct 2027)$14,197 $6,884 48%$$7,256 1.1xNMNM$—  n/an/an/a
CP VII (May 2018 / Oct 2021)$18,510 $17,507 95%$1,444 $21,834 1.3x14%8%$381 $1,563 1.2x12%
CP VI (May 2013 / May 2018)$13,000 $13,140 101%$23,164 $7,384 2.3x20%15%$498 $26,926 2.6x23%
CP V (Jun 2007 / May 2013)$13,720 $13,238 96%$27,893 $1,027 2.2x18%14%$97 $28,002 2.3x20%
CEP V (Oct 2018 / Sep 2024)6,416 4,987 78%1,323 5,521 1.4x24%13%$142  n/an/an/a
CEP IV (Sep 2014 / Oct 2018)3,670 3,797 103%5,447 1,965 2.0x18%12%$178 5,680 2.3x23%
CEP III (Jul 2007 / Dec 2012)5,295 5,177 98%11,715 72 2.3x19%14%$11,647 2.3x19%
CAP V (Jun 2018 / Jun 2024)$6,554 $5,654 86%$1,423 $5,991 1.3x25%12%$113 $904 1.8x143%
CAP IV (Jul 2013 / Jun 2018)$3,880 $4,044 104%$6,161 $2,047 2.0x18%13%$214 $6,953 2.7x26%
CAP III (Jun 2008 / Jul 2013)$2,552 $2,543 100%$5,123 $16 2.0x17%12%$$5,138 2.0x17%
CJP IV (Oct 2020 / Oct 2026)¥258,000 ¥165,478 64%¥— ¥214,638 1.3x68%30%$24  n/an/an/a
CJP III (Sep 2013 / Aug 2020)¥119,505 ¥91,192 76%¥189,426 ¥49,548 2.6x24%17%$29 ¥182,269 3.9x33%
CGFSP III (Dec 2017 / Dec 2023)$1,005 $926 92%$375 $1,715 2.3x40%30%$105 $815 6.5x58%
CGFSP II (Jun 2013 / Dec 2017)$1,000 $943 94%$1,959 $500 2.6x27%20%$41 $1,956 2.4x28%
CP Growth (Oct 2021 / Oct 2027)$1,149 $333 29%$— $348 1.0xNMNM$—  n/an/an/a
CEOF II (Nov 2015 / Mar 2020)$2,400 $2,361 98%$2,271 $2,284 1.9x20%15%$153 $2,401 3.8x54%
CEOF I (Sep 2011 / Nov 2015)$1,119 $1,175 105%$1,656 $187 1.6x12%8%$43 $1,604 1.6x15%
CETP V (Mar 2022 / Jun 2028)3,114 211 7%— 208 1.0xn/an/a$— n/an/an/a
CETP IV (Jul 2019 / Jun 2022)1,350 1,173 87%788 1,804 2.2x56%41%$96 788 9.3x122%
CETP III (Jul 2014 / Jul 2019)657 602 92%1,239 586 3.0x42%29%$44 1,181 4.4x51%
CGP II (Dec 2020 / Jan 2025)$1,840 $984 53%$$1,046 1.1xNMNM$—  n/an/an/a
CGP (Jan 2015 / Mar 2021)$3,588 $3,050 85%$1,383 $2,951 1.4x7%5%$66 $1,675 2.1x17%
CAGP IV (Aug 2008 / Dec 2014)$1,041 $954 92%$1,123 $90 1.3x6%1%$— $1,122 1.3x7%
CSABF (Dec 2009 / Dec 2016)$776 $736 95%$490 $378 1.2x3%Neg$— $650 1.3x8%
All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (10)$22,593 n/a$22,850 $14,847 1.7x22%15%$77 $23,237 2.2x33%
Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (11)$24,210 n/a$60,525 $— 2.5x28%20%$$60,525 2.5x28%
TOTAL CORPORATE PRIVATE EQUITY (13)n/a$181,259 $82,792 1.9x26%18%$2,314 $185,528 2.4x27%
Real Estate
CRP IX ( Oct 2021 / Oct 2026 )$7,987 $1,688 21%$— $1,706 1.0xNMNM$—  n/an/an/a
CRP VIII (Aug 2017 / Oct 2021)$5,505 $4,999 91%$3,944 $4,610 1.7x48%30%$182 $4,032 2.1x55%
CRP VII (Jun 2014 / Dec 2017)$4,162 $3,806 91%$4,900 $1,539 1.7x18%12%$71 $4,873 1.8x22%
CRP VI (Mar 2011 / Jun 2014)$2,340 $2,160 92%$3,785 $142 1.8x27%18%$$3,708 1.9x29%
CPI (May 2016 / n/a)$7,991 $6,748 21%$1,981 $7,334 1.4x20%17%n/a*$1,186 1.8x9%
All Other Active Funds & Vehicle (14)$8,717 n/a$10,910 $2,831 1.6x10%7%$18 $10,559 1.6x11%
Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (15)$6,886 n/a$9,718 $1.4x11%6%$— $9,723 1.4x11%
TOTAL REAL ESTATE (13) n/a$35,238 $18,168 1.5x13%9%$276 $34,080 1.7x13%
Natural Resources
CIEP II (Apr 2019 / Apr 2025)$2,286 $1,008 44%$544 $997 1.5x41%19%$32 $596 2.5xNM
CIEP I (Sep 2013 / Jun 2019)$2,500 $2,374 95%$1,764 $2,785 1.9x19%11%$174 $2,780 2.7x26%
CPP II (Sep 2014 / Apr 2021)$1,527 $1,537 101%$809 $1,942 1.8x17%11%$101 $365 4.1x76%
CGIOF (Dec 2018 / Sep 2023)$2,201 $1,723 78%$291 $1,985 1.3x24%10%$36 $248 1.4x15%
NGP XII (Jul 2017 / Jul 2022)$4,304 $2,775 64%$1,365 $3,952 1.9x22%16%$191 $1,201 3.2x39%
NGP XI (Oct 2014 / Jul 2017)$5,325 $4,979 93%$4,102 $5,331 1.9x15%11%$340 $5,923 2.2x30%
NGP X (Jan 2012 / Dec 2014)$3,586 $3,351 93%$3,298 $428 1.1x3%Neg$— $3,142 1.2x5%
All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (17)$4,561 n/a$2,458 $4,300 1.5x15%13%$26 $3,057 2.4x27%
Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (18)$1,190 n/a$1,435 $1.2x3%1%$— $1,436 1.2x3%
TOTAL NATURAL RESOURCES n/a$16,066 $21,719 1.6x13%9%$899 $18,747 1.9x15%
Legacy Energy Funds (16)$16,741  n/a$23,983 $72 1.4x12%6%$— $23,589 1.5x14%
137


*Net accrued fee related performance revenues for CPI of $53 million are excluded from net accrued performance revenues. These amounts will be reflected as fee related performance revenues when realized, and included in fund level fee revenues in our segment results.
(1) Represents the original cost of investments since inception of the fund.
(2)    Represents all realized proceeds since inception of the fund.
(3)    Represents remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, and may include remaining escrow values for realized investments.
(4)    Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(5)    An investment is considered realized when the investment fund has completely exited, and ceases to own an interest in, the investment. An investment is considered partially realized when the total amount of proceeds received in respect of such investment, including dividends, interest or other distributions and/or return of capital, represents at least 85% of invested capital and such investment is not yet fully realized. Because part of our value creation strategy involves pursuing best exit alternatives, we believe information regarding Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR, when considered together with the other investment performance metrics presented, provides investors with meaningful information regarding our investment performance by removing the impact of investments where significant realization activity has not yet occurred. Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR have limitations as measures of investment performance, and should not be considered in isolation. Such limitations include the fact that these measures do not include the performance of earlier stage and other investments that do not satisfy the criteria provided above. The exclusion of such investments will have a positive impact on Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR in instances when the MOIC and Gross IRR in respect of such investments are less than the aggregate MOIC and Gross IRR. Our measurements of Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR may not be comparable to those of other companies that use similarly titled measures. We do
(6)    Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents an annualized time-weighted return on Limited Partner invested capital, based on contributions, distributions and unrealized fair value as of the reporting date, before the impact of management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest. For fund vintages 2017 and after, Gross IRR includes the impact of interest expense related to the funding of investments on fund lines of credit. Gross IRR is calculated based on the timing of Limited Partner cash flows, which may differ to varying degrees from the timing of actual investment cash flows for the fund. Subtotal Gross IRR aggregations for multiple funds are calculated based on actual cash flow dates for each fund and represent a theoretical time-weighted return for a Limited Partner who invested sequentially in each fund.
(7)    Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents an annualized time-weighted return on Limited Partner invested capital, based on contributions, distributions and unrealized fair value as of the reporting date, after the impact of all management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest, including current accruals. Net IRR is calculated based on the timing of Limited Partner cash flows, which may differ to varying degrees from the timing of actual investment cash flows for the fund. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance revenues with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund. Subtotal Net IRR aggregations for multiple funds are calculated based on actual cash flow dates for each fund and represent a theoretical time-weighted return for a Limited Partner who invested sequentially in each fund.
(8)    Represents the net accrued performance fee balance/(giveback obligation) as of the current quarter end.
(9)    Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(10)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments arranged by us: CVP II, MENA, CCI, CSSAF I, CPF I, CAP Growth I, CAP Growth II, CBPF II, CEP II, ABV 8 and ACCD 2.
(11)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CP I, CP II, CP III, CP IV, CEP I, CAP I, CAP II, CBPF I, CJP I, CJP II, CMG, CVP I, CUSGF III, CGFSP I, CEVP I, CETP I, CETP II, CAVP I, CAVP II, CAGP III and Mexico.
(12)    For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not present Realized/Partially Realized performance information separately for funds that are still in the investment periodconsidered meaningful because of the relatively insignificant levellimited time since initial investment and early stage of realizations forcapital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is considered meaningful but is negative as of this type. However, to the extent such funds have had realizations, they are included in the Realized/Partially Realized performance information presented for Total Corporate Private Equity.
(6)Fully Invested funds are past the expiration date of the investment period as defined in the respective limited partnership agreement. In instances where a successor fund has had its first capital call, the predecessor fund is categorized as fully invested.
(7)Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(8)Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value after management fees, expenses and carried interest. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance fees with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund.
(9)
Aggregate includes the following funds: CP I, CMG, CVP I, CVP II, CUSGF III, CEVP, CETP I, CAVP I, CAVP II, CAGP III, CSABF, Mexico, CBPF, and MENA.
(10)Includes co-investments and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us.
(11)Aggregate, which is considered not meaningful, includes the following funds and their respective commencement dates: CSSAF (April 2012) , CPF I (June 2012), CCI (December 2012), CETP III (May 2014), CAGP V (May 2016), and CBPF II (November 2017).
(12)
For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is negative as of reporting period end.
(13)
For purposes of aggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate.

132






 
Remaining
Fair
Value (1)
 
Unrealized
MOIC (2)
 
Total
MOIC (3)
 
%
Invested(4)
 
In Accrued
Carry/
(Giveback) (5)
 
LTM
Realized
Carry (6)
 
Catch up
Rate
 
Fee Initiation
Date (7)
 
Quarters
Since Fee
Initiation
 
Original
Investment
Period
End Date
 As of December 31, 2017
Corporate Private Equity                   
CP VI$13,613.2
 1.3x 1.4x 90% X 
 100% Jun-13 19
 May-18
CAP IV$4,683.3
 1.6x 1.6x 82% X 
 100% Jul-13 18
 Nov-18
CEP IV3,246.1
 1.2x 1.2x 84% X 
 100% Sep-14 14
 Aug-19
CGP$2,782.8
 1.0x 1.0x 74% 
 
 100% Jan-15 12
 Dec-20
CP V$2,672.7
 0.7x 2.1x 96% X X 100% Jun-07 43
 May-13
CEP III1,398.2
 1.6x 2.3x 97% X X 100% Jul-07 42
 Dec-12
CEOF II$1,220.3
 1.1x 1.2x 48% 
 
 80% Nov-15 9
 Mar-21
CAP III$1,203.7
 2.0x 1.9x 100% X X 100% Jun-08 39
 May-14
CGFSP II$885.4
 1.4x 1.5x 90% X 
 100% Jun-13 19
 Dec-17
CEOF I$765.9
 0.9x 1.3x 104% X 
 80% Sep-11 26
 May-17
CJP III¥78,171.1
 1.6x 1.8x 50% X 
 100% Sep-13 18
 Feb-20
CAGP IV$515.8
 1.2x 1.5x 92% 
 
 100% Aug-08 38
 Jun-14
CGFSP I$210.6
 1.2x 2.3x 98% X X 100% Oct-08 37
 Sep-14
CJP II¥21,555.0
 1.4x 1.5x 86% 
 
 80% Oct-06 45
 Jul-12
CP IV$187.1
 2.0x 2.4x 97% X X 80% Apr-05 51
 Dec-10
CETP II111.5
 0.7x 2.9x 84% X X 100% Jan-08 40
 Jul-13
All Other Funds (8)$2,669.5
 1.2x 2.1x   NM NM        
Co-investment and Other (9)$4,623.9
 1.2x 2.3x   NM NM        
Total Corporate Private Equity (10)$42,636.8
 1.2x 1.9x              
(1)Remaining Fair Value reflects the unrealized carrying value of investments in carry funds and related co-investment vehicles. Significant funds with remaining fair value of greater than $100 million are listed individually.
(2)
Unrealized multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents remaining fair market value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by investment cost.
(3)Total MOIC represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital. For certain funds, represents the original cost of investments net of investment-level recallable proceeds, which is adjusted to reflect recyclability of invested capital for the purpose of calculating the fund MOIC.
(4)
Represents cumulative equity invested as of the reporting period divided by total commitments. Amount can be greater than 100% due to the re-investment of recallable distributions to fund investors.
(5)
Fund has accrued carry/(giveback) as of the reporting period.
(6)
Fund has realized carry in the last twelve months.
(7)Represents the date of the first capital contribution for management fees.
(8)
Aggregate includes the following funds: CMG, CP I, CP II, CP III, CEP I, CEP II, CAP I, CAP II, CBPF, CBPF II, CJP I, CEVP, CETP I, CETP III, CCI, CAVP I, CAVP II, CAGP III, CAGP V, Mexico, MENA, CSABF, CSSAF, CPF, CVP I, CVP II, and CUSGF III. In Accrued Carry/(Clawback) and LTM Realized Carry not indicated because the indicator does not apply to each fund within the aggregate.
(9)Includes co-investments, prefund investments and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us. In Accrued Carry/(Giveback) and LTM Realized Carry not indicated because the indicator does not apply to each fund within the aggregate.
(10)For purposes of aggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate.



133







Real Assets
(13)    For purposes of presenting our results of operations for this segment, our earnings from ouraggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate.
(14)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments inarranged by us: CCR, CER I, CER II, CEREP III and CRP V.
138


(15)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CRP I, CRP II, CRP III, CRP IV, CRCP I, CAREP I, CAREP II, CEREP I, and CEREP II.
(16)    Aggregate includes the following Legacy Energy funds and related co-investments: Energy I, Energy II, Energy III, Energy IV, Renew I, and Renew II.
(17)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments arranged by us: NGP are presented inGAP, NGP RP I, NGP RP II, NGP ETP IV, CPOCP, CRSEF and CRSEF II.
(18)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CIP.
(19)    The fund stepdown date represents the contractual stepdown date under the respective operating captionsfund agreements for funds on which the fee basis stepdown has not yet occurred. Funds without a listed Fee Initiation Date and the net income or loss from Urbplan allocable to the Partnership (after considerationStepdown Date have not yet initiated fees.
(20)    All amounts shown represent total capital commitments as of amounts allocable to non-controlling interests) is presented within investment income. We disposedDecember 31, 2022. Certain of our interestsrecent vintage funds are currently in Urbplan in a transaction in which a third party acquired operational controlfundraising and all of the economic interests in Urbplan in 2017. With this transaction, we deconsolidated Urbplan from our financial results (see Note 15total capital commitments are subject to our consolidated financial statements) and we expect that this will reduce investment losses in the segment going forward. change.



139



Global Credit
The following table presents our results of operations for our Real AssetsGlobal Credit segment:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$473.1 $314.4 $288.3 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other81.6 62.2 34.0 
Fee related performance revenues59.9 43.2 35.9 
Total fund level fee revenues614.6 419.8 358.2 
Realized performance revenues131.5 (6.0)26.5 
Realized principal investment income38.1 31.9 18.7 
Interest income15.3 5.6 10.4 
Total revenues799.5 451.3 413.8 
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits284.2 237.1 206.1 
Realized performance revenues related compensation61.3 (2.7)12.2 
Total compensation and benefits345.5 234.4 218.3 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses97.7 63.1 45.7 
Depreciation and amortization expense8.2 8.0 7.0 
Interest expense32.6 26.1 26.6 
Total expenses484.0 331.6 297.6 
(=) Distributable Earnings$315.5 $119.7 $116.2 
(-) Realized Net Performance Revenues70.2 (3.3)14.3 
(-) Realized Principal Investment Income38.1 31.9 18.7 
(+) Net Interest17.3 20.5 16.2 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$224.5 $111.6 $99.4 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues     
Fund level fee revenues     
Fund management fees$263.6
 $251.1
 $255.9
Portfolio advisory fees, net0.8
 0.2
 0.4
Transaction fees, net4.5
 
 2.1
Total fund level fee revenues268.9
 251.3
 258.4
Performance fees     
Realized92.0
 53.1
 163.2
Unrealized268.3
 274.0
 (42.5)
Total performance fees360.3
 327.1
 120.7
Investment income (loss)     
Realized(63.2) (20.6) (93.6)
Unrealized26.7
 1.4
 63.1
Total investment loss(36.5) (19.2) (30.5)
Interest income3.0
 1.7
 0.3
Other income2.2
 1.6
 2.6
Total revenues597.9
 562.5
 351.5
Segment Expenses     
Compensation and benefits     
Direct base compensation77.6
 72.1
 70.0
Indirect base compensation50.5
 39.1
 39.3
Equity-based compensation34.9
 26.3
 25.0
Performance fee related     
Realized41.6
 37.6
 68.5
Unrealized75.3
 81.9
 26.3
Total compensation and benefits279.9
 257.0
 229.1
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses78.5
 67.1
 74.6
Depreciation and amortization expense7.1
 5.9
 4.3
Interest expense17.0
 16.0
 10.6
Total expenses382.5
 346.0
 318.6
Economic Income$215.4
 $216.5
 $32.9
(-) Net Performance Fees243.4
 207.6
 25.9
(-) Investment Loss(36.5) (19.2) (30.5)
(+) Equity-based Compensation34.9
 26.3
 25.0
(+) Net interest14.0
 14.3
 10.3
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies(5.8) 
 9.2
(=) Fee Related Earnings$51.6
 $68.7
 $82.0
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees50.4
 15.5
 94.7
(+) Realized Investment Loss(63.2) (20.6) (93.6)
(+) Net interest(14.0) (14.3) (10.3)
(=) Distributable Earnings$24.8
 $49.3
 $72.8



134
140







Year Ended December 31, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162021 and Year Ended December 31, 20162021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20152020


Distributable Earnings
Distributable earnings decreased $24.5increased $195.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, and decreased $23.5increased $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the changechanges in distributable earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$119.7 $116.2 
Increases (decreases):
Increase in fee related earnings112.9 12.2 
Increase (decrease) in realized net performance revenues73.5 (17.6)
Increase in realized principal investment income6.2 13.2 
Decrease (increase) in net interest3.2 (4.3)
Total increase195.8 3.5 
Distributable earnings, current year$315.5 $119.7 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$49.3
$72.8
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in realized net performance fees34.9
(79.2)
   (Increase) decrease in realized investment loss(42.6)73.0
   Decrease in fee related earnings(17.1)(13.3)
   Decrease (increase) in net interest0.3
(4.0)
   Total decrease(24.5)(23.5)
Distributable earnings, current year$24.8
$49.3

Realized Net Performance Fees. Revenues.Realized net performance feesrevenues increased $34.9$73.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to realized net performance revenues generated by CCOF I and our structured credit fund, partially offset by the realization of a $5.9 million net giveback obligation for CSP III in 2022.

Realized net performance revenues decreased $79.2$17.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015. The increase2020 primarily due to realization of a $6.5 million net giveback obligation for CSP III in 2021 and realized net performance feesrevenues generated from Carlyle Aviation Partners for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher realizations on a certain U.S real estate fund and our power opportunities fund as well as the absence in 2017 of the 2016 realization of giveback obligations on two of our Legacy Energy funds (Energy II and Energy III), which resulted in a decrease of $35.9 million in realized net performance fees in 2016. These realizations were partially offset by lower realizations on a Europe real estate external coinvestment fund in 2017 as compared to 2016. The decrease in realized net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to lower realizations in our U.S. real estate funds in 2016 as compared to 2015 and the absence in 2016 of realizations in our power opportunities fund. In addition, we realized the giveback obligations in 2016 on Energy II and Energy III, which resulted in a decrease of $35.9 million in realized net performance fees. 2020.

Realized net performance fees were primarily generated by the following funds for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively:
Year Ended December 31,
201720162015
CRP VICRP VICRP VI
CPOCPCEREP III - External
Co-invest
CRP III

CRP IIICPOCP

Principal Investment Income.Realized Investment Loss. Realizedprincipal investment lossincome increased $42.6$6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021 and realized investment loss decreased $73.0increased $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The increase in realized principal investment lossincome for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 was primarily relates todriven by realized principal investment income from CCOF I and CCOF II in 2022, as well as the recognitionimpact of $75.0 million of Urbplan losses, including a $65.0 million realized investment loss in 2017 associated with the disposal of our interests in Urbplan in a transaction in which a third party acquired operational control and all of the economic interests in Urbplan. With this transaction, we deconsolidated Urbplan from our financial results (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements). Additionally, we recognized realized investment losses related to Urbplan of $37.1 million during 2016. These realized losses on investments in 2017CEMOF in the prior year. These impacts were partially offset by higherlower realized gains on investmentsprincipal investment income from our U.S. CLOs and CSP IV in our Europe real estate funds in 2017 as compared to 2016 and higher realized gains on NGP fund investments in 2016 as compared to 2017.

2022. The decreaseincrease in realized principal investment lossincome for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 20152020 was primarily relatesdue to the absence in 2016 of thehigher realized principal investment loss recorded in 2015 relating to the realization of Carlyle's cumulative lossesincome from our guarantee of liabilities of Carlyle Europe Real Estate Partners I, L.P. (“CEREP I”) associated with an adverse courtU.S. CLOs and distressed credit carry funds.


135
141







judgment in a French tax court proceeding of $80 million. (See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.) Additionally, there were higher realized investment losses of $16.0 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 associated with Urbplan. These realized investment losses were partially offset by higher realized gains on investments in our real estate funds and the NGP funds.

Fee Related Earnings

Fee related earnings decreased $17.1increased $112.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, and decreased $13.3increased $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the change in fee related earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$111.6 $99.4 
Increases (Decreases):
Increase in fee revenues194.8 61.6 
Increase in cash-based compensation(47.1)(31.0)
Increase in general, administrative and other indirect expenses(34.6)(17.4)
  All other changes(0.2)(1.0)
Total increase112.9 12.2 
Fee related earnings, current year$224.5 $111.6 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$68.7
$82.0
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in fee revenues17.6
(7.1)
   Increase in direct and indirect base compensation(16.9)(1.9)
   Increase in general, administrative and other
expenses
(17.2)(1.7)
   Increase in interest expense(1.0)(5.4)
   All other changes0.4
2.8
   Total decrease(17.1)(13.3)
Fee related earnings, current year$51.6
$68.7


Fee Revenues. Total fee revenues increased $17.6$194.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 and decreased $7.1increased $61.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to the same period in 2015,2020, due to the following:

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Higher (lower) fund management fees$12.5
$(4.8)
Higher (lower) transaction fees4.5
(2.1)
Higher (lower) portfolio advisory fees0.6
(0.2)
Total increase (decrease) in fee revenues$17.6
$(7.1)
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Higher fund management fees$158.7 $26.1 
Higher portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other19.4 28.2 
Higher fee related performance revenues16.7 7.3 
Total increase in fee revenues$194.8 $61.6 
The increase in fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021 was primarily reflects increased managementdriven by $107.0 million in fees fromearned under the Fortitude strategic advisory services agreement and on the CBAM portfolio, as well as investment activity at CCOF II, which charges fees based on invested capital, the issuance of U.S. CLOs over the last twelve months, and growth in our eighth real estate fund (“CRP VIII”), which had its first closing in 2017. This increase was partially offset by a $8.6 million decrease in catch-up management fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016. While there were no significant catch-up management fees during 2017, catch-up management fees of $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 were primarily due to subsequent closes in 2016 for our second power fund (“CPP II”) and our first international energy fund (“CIEP I”).
Interval Fund.
The decreaseincrease in fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 20152020 was primarily reflects a $15.2 million decrease in catch-updriven by increased management fees from $23.8 million in 2015 to $8.6 million in 2016. The higher catch-upCCOF I, which earns fees based on AUM, CCOF II, which activated management fees in 2015 primarily related to subsequent closings in 2015October 2020, record CLO origination activity, and the activation of fees on our seventh U.S. real estate fund (“CRP VII”), CIEP I and CPP II. This decrease wasnewly-raised SMAs. These increases were partially offset by increasedlower management fee revenuesfees from CSP IV due to higher assets under management from additional commitments raised during 2015the step-down of the fee rate and 2016 for CPP II, CRP VII, and CIEP I as well as the activation of management feesbasis in NGP XI.

January 2021.
The total weighted average managementincreases in fee rate declined to 1.20% atrelated performance revenues for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2021 relative to the prior periods were driven by higher fee related performance revenues from 1.26% at December 31, 2016 primarily due to new funds being raised with lower management fee rates. our Interval Fund.
The weighted average management fee rate foron our carry funds in the investment period decreased to 1.35%from 1.21% at December 31, 2017 from 1.43%2021 to 1.05% at December 31, 2016.

136







2022. The total weighted average management fee rate increased to 1.26% at December 31, 2016 from 1.24% at December 31, 2015decrease was primarily due to investment activity in funds inside the investment period accounting foron which management fees are based on invested capital and have a larger portion of Fee-earning AUM in the segment.lower fee rate, including separately managed accounts. The weighted average management fee rate foron our carry funds in the investment period declined to 1.43%slightly decreased from 1.22% at December 31, 2016 from 1.44%2020 to 1.21% at December 31, 2015.2021.


Direct    Portfolio advisory and indirecttransaction fees, net, and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2022 were primarily driven by transaction fees in our insurance and aviation strategies, as well as underwriting fees related to Carlyle Global Capital Markets. Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net, and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily from increased underwriting fees related to Carlyle Global Capital Markets. As capital markets activity slows, we may experience a corresponding reduction in the capital markets fees we earn in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance and placement of debt and equity securities.
142


    Cash-based compensation expense. Direct and indirectbenefits expense. Cash-based compensation and benefits expense increased $16.9$47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 20162021, primarily due to higherincreased headcount, as well as an increase in compensation associated with fundraising activitiesfee related performance revenues (approximately 45% of $8.6 million in 2017 versus 2016 and an increase in 2017 cash bonuses.

    Direct and indirect compensation expense increased $1.9fee related performance revenues are paid as cash-based compensation) of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 20152022.

Cash-based compensation and benefits expense increased $31.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, primarily due to increased headcount partially offset by lower compensation associated with fundraising activities of $3.3 million in 2016 versus 2015.and higher cash bonuses.
General, administrative and other indirect expenses. General, administrative and other indirect expenses increased $17.2$34.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016. The primary drivers of the increase were foreign currency losses recorded2021, primarily due to increases in 2017 as compared to foreign currency gains recorded in 2016, increased real estate costs,professional fees, travel and increased external costs associated with fundraising activities of $10.0 million related to CRP VIII.other general expenses.
General, administrative and other indirect expenses increased $1.7$11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, excluding the impact of litigation cost recoveries in 2020, primarily due to an increaseincreases in professional fees, partially offset by a decrease in external costs associated with fundraising activities.
Economic Income
Economic income decreased $1.1 millionrent and other general expenses. General, administrative and other indirect expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and economic income increased $183.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The following table provides the components of the change in economic income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:2020 also reflects expense recoveries from Carlyle FRL.


Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Economic income, prior year$216.5
$32.9
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase in net performance fees35.8
181.7
   (Increase) decrease in investment loss(17.3)11.3
   Increase in equity-based compensation(8.6)(1.3)
   Decrease in fee related earnings(17.1)(13.3)
   Decrease (increase) in net interest0.3
(4.0)
   Decrease in reserve for litigation and contingencies5.8
9.2
   Total (decrease) increase(1.1)183.6
Economic income, current year$215.4
$216.5

Performance Fees. Performance fees (realized and unrealized) increased $33.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to higher appreciation from the NGP funds, partially offset by a decrease in performance fees generated by the real estate funds. Performance fees (realized and unrealized) increased $206.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to CRP VII exceeding its performance threshold in 2016 and, therefore recognizing performance fees, performance fees generated by the NGP funds in 2016 as compared to performance fee reversals in 2015, and a reduction in the giveback liability associated with certain of our Legacy Energy funds in 2016.

137






Performance fees are from the following types of funds:

 Performance Fees
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Real Estate funds$196.8
 $261.0
 $204.1
Natural Resources funds161.0
 42.0
 (0.8)
Legacy Energy funds2.5
 24.1
 (82.6)
Total performance fees$360.3
 $327.1
 $120.7

The $360.3 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CRP VII of $107.7 million,
NGP XI of $96.2 million,
CIEP I of $54.0 million,
CRP V of $50.7 million, and
our third U.S. real estate fund (“CRP III”) of $27.1 million.

The $327.1 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CRP VII of $89.4 million,
our fifth U.S. real estate fund (“CRP V”) of $62.0 million,
NGP XI of $35.9 million,
CRP VI of $32.4 million, and
CRP III of $22.1 million.

The $120.7 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CRP VI of $101.1 million,
CRP V of $73.9 million,
CRP III of $22.9 million,
Energy III of $(38.7) million, and
Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund IV (“Energy IV”) of $(37.8) million.

Performance fees of $360.3 million, $327.1 million, and $120.7 million are inclusive of performance fees reversed of approximately $9.2 million, $4.7 million, and $102.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The appreciation (depreciation) in remaining value of assets for this segment by type of fund are as follows:


Year Ended December 31,

201720162015
Real Estate funds17%19%27%
Natural Resources funds30%24%(3)%
Legacy Energy funds6%10%(26)%
Total19%18%(3)%

Net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $243.4 million, representing an increase of $35.8 million from $207.6 million in net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in net performance

138






fees was primarily due to increased performance fees from the NGP funds, for which there is no performance fee related compensation expense, partially offset by decreased performance fees from the real estate funds.

Net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $207.6 million, representing an increase of $181.7 million from $25.9 million in net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net performance fees primarily relates to increased performance fees from the U.S. real estate funds, the NGP funds, and reversals of performance fees in the Legacy Energy funds in 2015 as compared to a reduction of the giveback obligation in 2016.

Performance fees earned from the Legacy Energy funds and from NGP funds are allocated solely to Carlyle and are not otherwise shared or allocated with our investment professionals since the investment teams are employed by Riverstone and NGP, respectively, and not Carlyle. Accordingly, performance fee compensation as a percentage of performance fees is generally not a comparable measurement for Real Assets from period to period.

Total Investment Loss. Total investment loss (realized and unrealized) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $36.5 million compared to total investment loss of $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in total investment loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to the recognition of a $65.0 million realized investment loss recognized in 2017 associated with the disposal of our interests in Urbplan in a transaction in which a third party acquired operational control and all of the economic interests in Urbplan. With this transaction, we deconsolidated Urbplan from our financial results (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements). This increase in total investment loss was partially offset by higher appreciation on investments in our U.S. and Europe real estate funds, as well as the NGP funds, in 2017 as compared to 2016.
Total investment loss (realized and unrealized) for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $19.2 million compared to total investment loss of $30.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in total investment loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to the absence in 2016 of approximately $34 million in losses from our guarantee of liabilities of CEREP I associated with an adverse court judgment in a French tax court proceeding that was recorded in 2015. The decrease in total investment loss was also due to investment gains of approximately $0.8 million associated with our investments in NGP for 2016 as compared to approximately $5.5 million of investment losses associated with our investments in NGP in 2015, partially offset by higher investment losses associated with Urbplan.
Equity-based Compensation. Equity-based compensation was $34.9 million, $26.3 million, and $25.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase from 2016 to 2017 is primarily attributable to equity-based compensation expense in connection with the March 2017 agreement with NGP (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements).
Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies. Real Assets' share of the reserve for litigation and contingencies decreased $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily related to Real Assets' share of the $25 million reserve reversal related to the CCC litigation recognized in 2017. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the CCC litigation. Real Assets had recognized its share of a $50 million reserve for litigation and contingencies for $9.2 million in 2015.


139






Fee-earning AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20172022
Fee-earning AUM is presented below for each period together with the components of change during each respective period.
The table below breaks out Fee-earning AUM by its respective components at each period.
 As of December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Credit
Components of Fee-earning AUM(1)
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$6,240 $2,758 $3,921 
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital13,446 9,632 5,607 
Fee-earning AUM based on collateral balances, at par46,173 30,779 26,480 
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value2,008 1,409 1,578 
Fee-earning AUM based on fair value and other(2)
53,362 7,140 4,547 
Total Fee-earning AUM$121,229 $51,718 $42,133 
Weighted Average Management Fee Rates(3)
Global Credit Carry Funds1.05 %1.21 %1.22 %
(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Includes the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement and funds with fees based on gross asset value.
(3)Represents the aggregate effective management fee rate for carry funds only, weighted by each carry fund’s Fee-earning AUM, as of the end of each period presented. As of December 31, 2022, carry funds represented 13% of Global Credit Fee-earning AUM, respectively.
143

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Real Assets   
Components of Fee-earning AUM (1)   
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$16,453
 $13,008
 $12,588
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital (2)13,901
 13,878
 17,353
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value892
 285
 
Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other (3)353
 316
 964
Total Fee-earning AUM (4)$31,599
 $27,487
 $30,905
Weighted Average Management Fee Rates (5)   
All Funds1.20% 1.26% 1.24%
Funds in Investment Period1.35% 1.43% 1.44%

(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, See “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Includes amounts committed to or reserved for investments for certain real estate funds.
(3)Includes certain funds that are calculated on gross asset value.
(4)Energy II, Energy III, Energy IV, Renew I, and Renew II (collectively, the “Legacy Energy Funds”), are managed with Riverstone Holdings LLC and its affiliates. Affiliates of both Carlyle and Riverstone act as investment advisers to each of the Legacy Energy Funds. With the exception of Energy IV and Renew II, where Carlyle has a minority representation on the funds’ management committees, management of each of the Legacy Energy Funds is vested in committees with equal representation by Carlyle and Riverstone, and the consent of representatives of both Carlyle and Riverstone is required for investment decisions. As of December 31, 2017, the Legacy Energy Funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $5.2 billion in AUM and $3.8 billion in Fee-earning AUM. NGP VII, NGP VIII, NGP IX, or in the case of NGP M&R, NGP ETP I, and NGP ETP II, certain affiliated entities (collectively, the “NGP management fee funds”) and NGP X, NGP GAP and NGP XI (referred to herein as, "carry funds"), are managed by NGP Energy Capital Management. As of December 31, 2017, the NGP management fee funds and carry funds had, in the aggregate, approximately $13.0 billion in AUM and $11.2 billion in Fee-earning AUM.
(5)Represents the aggregate effective management fee rate of each fund in the segment, weighted by each fund's Fee-earning AUM, as of the end of each period presented. Calculation reflects Carlyle’s 10% and 55% interest in management fees earned by the Legacy Energy funds, NGP management fee funds, and carry funds, respectively.

The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Fee-earning AUM.
 Year Ended Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Credit
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$51,718 $42,133 $37,862 
Inflows(1)
78,057 13,029 6,368 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(6,845)(4,314)(3,906)
Market Activity & Other(3)
(1,103)1,501 618 
Foreign Exchange(4)
(598)(631)1,191 
Balance, End of Period$121,229 $51,718 $42,133 
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Real Assets     
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward 
Balance, Beginning of Period$27,487
 $30,905
 $28,351
Inflows, including Fee-paying Commitments (1)8,812
 1,514
 8,426
Outflows, including Distributions (2)(4,925) (4,860) (5,655)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (3)73
 28
 (1)
Foreign Exchange and other (4)152
 (100) (216)
Balance, End of Period$31,599
 $27,487
 $30,905
(1)Inflows represent(1)Inflows represents limited partner capital raised and capital invested by funds outside the investment period.

140






(2)Outflows represent distributions from funds outside the investment period and changes in fee basis for our carry funds where the investment period has expired.
(3)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value.
(4)Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
Fee-earning AUM was $31.6 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $4.1 billion, or 15%, compared to $27.5 billion at December 31, 2016. The increase was driven by inflows of $8.8 billion primarily related to new fee-payingseparately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments raisedwere activated during the period, the fee-earning commitments invested in CRP VIII and NGP XII. This was partially offset by outflows of $4.9 billion primarily related to distributions in our Legacy Energy, U.S. Real Estate, and NGP Energy funds. Investment and distribution activity by funds still in the original investment period do not impact Fee-earning AUM as these fundsvehicles for which management fees are based on commitments and not invested capital.
Fee-earning AUM was $27.5 billion at December 31, 2016, a decreasecapital, the fee-earning collateral balance of $3.4 billion, or 11%, compared to $30.9 billion at December 31, 2015. This decrease was driven by outflows of $4.9 billion primarily attributable to distributions in our Real Estate and NGP Energy funds outside of the investment period. Partially offsetting this decrease were inflows, including fee-paying commitments, of $1.5 billion driven by additional commitments raised in CPP II and capital invested by CPI,new CLO issuances, as well as additional capital invested by various funds outside of the original investment period.
Fee-earning AUM was $30.9 billion at December 31, 2015, an increase of $2.5 billion, or 9%, compared to $28.4 billion at December 31, 2014. This increase was driven by inflows of $8.4 billion primarily related to new commitments in CRP VII, CPP II, and CIEP I as well as the activation of previously raised commitments in NGP XI. This increase was partially offset by outflows of $5.7 billion, primarily related to distribution activitygross subscriptions in our funds outside the original investment period in addition to the reduction invehicles for which management fee basis for funds at the end of their original investment period.

Total AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2017
The table below providesfees are based on net asset value. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period to period rollforward of Totalfor which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM.
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Real Assets     
Total AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$34,252
 $37,991
 $42,295
New Commitments (1)10,205
 1,203
 3,828
Outflows (2)(4,247) (6,844) (5,795)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (3)3,614
 3,317
 (2,357)
Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) (4)112
 (17) (256)
Other (5)(1,048) (1,398) 276
Balance, End of Period$42,888
 $34,252
 $37,991
(1)New Commitments reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing.
(2)Outflows includes distributions in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, NGP management fee funds and separately managed accounts.
(3)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, NGP management fee funds and separately managed accounts.
(4)
Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(5)Includes expiring available capital, the impact of capital calls for fees and expenses and other changes in AUM.

141






Total AUM was $42.9 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $8.6 billion, or 25%, compared to $34.3 billion at December 31, 2016. This increase was driven by $10.2 billion of new commitments primarily attributable to fundraising in CRP VIII, NGP XII, and CPI. Also driving the increase was $3.6 billion of market appreciation including $1.2 billion attributable to NGP XI , $0.5 billion attributable to CRP VII, and $0.3 billion attributable to CIEP. Partially offsetting the increase were $4.2 billion of outflows primarily due to distributions in our U.S. Real Estate, Legacy Energy, and Europe Real Estate funds.
Total AUM was $34.3 billion at December 31, 2016, a decrease of $3.7 billion, or 10%, compared to $38.0 billion at December 31, 2015. This decrease was driven by $6.8 billion of outflows primarily related to distributions in the NGP and our U.S. Real Estate funds. Partially offsetting this decrease was $3.3 billion of market appreciation, representing a 18% increase in the value of our carry fund portfolio. The carry funds driving appreciation for the period included $0.5 billion attributable to NGP X , $0.5 billion attributable to NGP XI, and $0.4 billion attributable to CRP VII.
Total AUM was $38.0 billion at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $4.3 billion, or 10%, compared to $42.3 billion at December 31, 2014. This decrease was primarily driven by $5.8 billion of outflows primarily related to distributions in our U.S. Real Estate, NGP Energy, and Legacy Energy funds and $2.4 billion of market depreciation, representing a 3% decrease in the value of our carry fund portfolio. The carry funds driving depreciation for the period included $1.0 billion attributable to Energy IV, $0.6 billion attributable to Energy III, and $0.4 billion attributable to NGP X, partially offset by $0.5 billion of appreciation attributable to CRP VI . Offsetting this was $3.8 billion of new commitments driven by fundraising in CRP VII, NGP XI, and CPP II.

Fund Performance Metrics
Fund performance information for our investment funds that have at least $1.0 billion in capital commitments, cumulative equity invested or total value as of December 31, 2017 and excluding the NGP management fee funds, which we refer to as our “significant funds,” is generally included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund return information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Carlyle Group L.P. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Carlyle Group L.P. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business Operations — The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common units.”

142






The following tables reflect the performance of our significant funds in our Real Assets business. See “Business — Our Family of Funds” for a legend of the fund acronyms listed below.
     TOTAL INVESTMENTS 
REALIZED/PARTIALLY
REALIZED INVESTMENTS(5)
     As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2017
 Fund Inception Date (1) Committed Capital Cumulative Invested Capital (2) Total Fair Value (3) MOIC (4) Gross IRR (7) (12) Net
IRR (8) (12)
 Cumulative Invested Capital (2) Total Fair Value (3) MOIC (4) Gross IRR (7) (12)
Real Assets
 
 (Reported in Local Currency, in Millions) (Reported in Local Currency, in Millions)
Fully Invested Funds (6)
 
         ��        
CRP III11/2000 $564.1
 $522.5
 $1,850.3
 3.5x 44% 30% $522.5
 $1,850.3
 3.5x 44%
CRP IV12/2004 $950.0
 $1,282.2
 $2,022.6
 1.6x 8% 5% $1,191.6
 $1,962.7
 1.6x 8%
CRP V11/2006 $3,000.0
 $3,430.0
 $5,669.6
 1.7x 12% 9% $2,942.0
 $4,972.5
 1.7x 14%
CRP VI9/2010 $2,340.0
 $2,219.3
 $4,012.7
 1.8x 29% 20% $1,581.6
 $3,190.4
 2.0x 33%
CRP VII3/2014 $4,161.6
 $3,220.4
 $4,282.4
 1.3x 21%
 12%
 $315.2
 $593.9
 1.9x 33%
CEREP I3/2002 426.6
 517.0
 698.6
 1.4x 14% 7% 517.0
 698.6
 1.4x 14%
CEREP II4/2005 762.7
 833.8
 128.1
 0.2x Neg
 Neg
 826.7
 132.3
 0.2x Neg
CEREP III5/2007 2,229.5
 2,025.7
 2,432.2
 1.2x 4% 1% 1,706.7
 2,247.6
 1.3x 6%
CIP9/2006 $1,143.7
 $1,069.8
 $1,427.6
 1.3x 6% 3% $997.1
 $1,365.1
 1.4x 6%
NGP X1/2012 $3,586.0
 $3,267.2
 $4,185.6
 1.3x 9% 6% $1,382.9
 $2,505.2
 1.8x 24%
NGP XI6/2014 $5,325.0
 $3,696.7
 $5,348.6
 1.4x 39%
 27%
 $228.9
 $471.3
 2.1x 169%
Energy II7/2002 $1,100.0
 $1,334.8
 $3,130.9
 2.3x 81% 55% $1,334.8
 $3,130.9
 2.3x 81%
Energy III10/2005 $3,800.0
 $3,569.7
 $5,513.1
 1.5x 10% 7% $2,873.9
 $5,045.9
 1.8x 14%
Energy IV12/2007 $5,979.1
 $6,262.0
 $8,167.3
 1.3x 8% 5% $4,066.5
 $6,012.2
 1.5x 14%
Renew II3/2008 $3,417.5
 $2,809.4
 $4,188.8
 1.5x 9% 6% $1,555.3
 $2,440.9
 1.6x 12%
All Other Funds (9)Various 
 $2,939.5
 $3,289.7
 1.1x 4% Neg
 $2,662.1
 $3,019.5
 1.1x 5%
Co-investments and Other(10)Various 
 $6,039.4
 $9,880.3
 1.6x 16% 13% $4,180.4
 $7,228.9
 1.7x 20%
Total Fully Invested Funds 
 $45,721.8
 $66,887.1
 1.5x 12% 8% $29,501.8
 $47,490.4
 1.6x 16%
Funds in the Investment Period (6) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CRP VIII5/2017 $5,010.7
 $229.8
 $222.5
 1.0x NM
 NM
 

 

 
 

CIEP I9/2013 $2,500.0
 $988.8
 $1,510.4
 1.5x 28%
 11%
 

 

 
 

NGP XII7/2017 $2,776.7
 $241.0
 $241.0
 1.0x NM
 NM
 

 

 
 

CPP II6/2014 $1,526.9
 $643.9
 $706.3
 1.1x NM
 NM
 

 

 
 

CPI5/2016 $1,144.0
 $863.4
 $968.3
 1.1x NM
 NM
 

 

 
 

All Other Funds (11)Various 
 $391.5
 $359.1
 0.9x NM
 NM
 
 
 
 
Total Funds in the Investment Period $3,358.4
 $4,007.5
 1.2x 16% 4% $
 $
 n/a n/a
TOTAL Real Assets (13)
 
 $49,080.2
 $70,894.6
 1.4x 12% 8% $29,501.8
 $47,490.4
 1.6x 16%
(1)
The data presented herein that provides “inception to date” performance results of our segments relates to the period following the formation of the first fund within each segment. For our Corporate Private Equity segment our first fund was formed in 1990. For our Real Assets segment, our first fund was formed in 1997.
(2)Represents the original cost of all capital called for investments since inception of the fund.
(3)Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(4)Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(5)An investment is considered realized when the investment fund has completely exited, and ceases to own an interest in, the investment. An investment is considered partially realized when the total amount of proceeds received in respect of such investment, including dividends, interest or other distributions and/or return of capital, represents at least 85% of invested capital and such investment is not yet fully realized. Because part of our value creation strategy involves pursuing best exit alternatives, we believe information regarding Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR, when considered together with the other investment performance metrics presented, provides investors with meaningful information regarding our investment performance by removing the impact of investments where significant realization activity has not yet occurred. Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR have limitations as measures of investment performance, and should not be considered in isolation. Such limitations include the fact that these measures

143






do not include the performance of earlier stage and other investments that do not satisfy the criteria provided above. The exclusion of such investments will have a positive impact on Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR in instances when the MOIC and Gross IRR in respect of such investments are less than the aggregate MOIC and Gross IRR. Our measurements of Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR may not be comparable to those of other companies that use similarly titled measures. We do not present Realized/Partially Realized performance information separately for funds that are still in the investment period because of the relatively insignificant level of realizations for funds of this type. However, to the extent such funds have had realizations, they are included in the Realized/Partially Realized performance information presented for Total Corporate Private Equity and Total Real Assets.
(6)Fully Invested funds are past the expiration date of the investment period as defined in the respective limited partnership agreement. In instances where a successor fund has had its first capital call, the predecessor fund is categorized as fully invested.
(7)Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(8)Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value after management fees, expenses and carried interest. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance fees with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund.
(9)
Aggregate includes the following funds: CRP I, CRP II, CAREP I, CAREP II, CRCP I, CPOCP, Renew I and Energy I.
(10)Includes co-investments and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us.
(11)Aggregate includes NGP GAP and CCR. Return is not considered meaningful, as the investment period commenced in December 2013 for NGP GAP and October 2016 for CCR.
(12)
For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is negative as of reporting period end.
(13)For purposes of aggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate.

 Remaining Fair Value(1) Unrealized MOIC(2) Total MOIC(3) % Invested(4) In Accrued Carry/ (Giveback) (5) LTM Realized Carry (6) Catch up Rate Fee Initiation Date (7) Quarters Since Fee Initiation Original Investment Period End Date
 As of December 31, 2017
Real Assets                   
NGP XI$4,684.7
 1.4x 1.4x 69% X 
 80% Feb-15 12
 Oct-19
CRP VII$3,625.0
 1.3x 1.3x 77% X 
 80% Jun-14 15
 Mar-19
Energy IV$2,820.6
 1.0x 1.3x 104% (X) 
 80% Feb-08 40
 Dec-13
NGP X$1,788.2
 1.0x 1.3x 91% 
 
 80% Jan-12 24
 May-17
Renew II$1,708.6
 0.8x 1.5x 82% (X) 
 80% Mar-08 40
 May-14
CIEP I$1,428.2
 1.5x 1.5x 40% X 
 80% Oct-13 17
 Sep-19
CRP V$1,323.8
 2.1x 1.7x 114% X 
 50% Nov-06 45
 Nov-11
CPI$928.2
 1.1x 1.1x n/a
 X 
 50% May-16 7
 Apr-21
CRP VI$772.7
 1.3x 1.8x 95% X X 50% Mar-11 28
 Mar-16
CRP IV$626.7
 3.6x 1.6x 135% 
 
 50% Jan-05 52
 Dec-09
CPP II$590.6
 1.1x 1.1x 42% 
 
 80% Sep-14 14
 Apr-21
CRP III$464.5
 140.3x 3.5x 93% X X 50% Mar-01 68
 May-05
CEREP III233.0
 0.7x 1.2x 91% 
 
 67% Jun-07 43
 May-11
Energy III$264.7
 0.3x 1.5x 94% (X) 
 80% Nov-05 49
 Oct-11
NGP XII$241.0
 1.0x 1.0x 9% 
 
 80% Nov-17 1
 Oct-19
CRP VIII$222.5
 1.0x 1.0x 5% 
 
 80% Aug-17 2
 May-22
All Other Funds (8)$664.6
 0.7x 1.3x   NM NM 
 
 
 
Co-investment and Other (9)$2,490.8
 1.1x 1.6x   NM NM 
 
 
 
Total Real Assets (10)$24,925.6
 1.2x 1.4x   
 
 
 
 
 
(1)Remaining Fair Value reflects the unrealized carrying value of investments in carry funds and related co-investment vehicles. Significant funds with remaining fair value of greater than $100 million are listed individually.

144






(2)Unrealized multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents remaining fair market value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by investment cost.
(3)Total MOIC represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital. For certain funds, represents the original cost of investments net of investment-level recallable proceeds, which is adjusted to reflect recyclability of invested capital for the purpose of calculating the fund MOIC.
(4)Represents cumulative equity invested as of the reporting period divided by total commitments. Amount can be greater than 100% due to the re-investment of recallable distributions to fund investors.
(5)
Fund has accrued carry/(giveback) as of the reporting period.
(6)
Fund has realized carry in the last twelve months.
(7)
Represents the date of the first capital contribution for management fees.
(8)Aggregate includes the following funds: CRP I, CRP II, CRCP I, CEREP I, CEREP II, CAREP I, CAREP II, CCR, CPOCP, CGIOF, NGP GAP, Energy I, Energy II and Renew I. In Accrued Carry/(Clawback) and LTM Realized Carry not indicated because the indicator does not apply to each fund within the aggregate.
(9)Includes co-investments, prefund investments and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us. In Accrued Carry/(Giveback) and LTM Realized Carry not indicated because the indicator does not apply to each fund within the aggregate.
(10)
For purposes of aggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate.


145






Global Credit
We continue to invest in growing our Global Credit, formerly called Global Market Strategies, business. We conducted a review in 2016 of the segment in order to realign and reorganize certain of the segment's operations. We have exited our hedge fund business (ESG in 2016 and Claren Road in January 2017) and, as a result of settlements reached during 2017 with investors in two commodities investment vehicles managed by Vermillion, we have completed the exit of the commodities investment advisory business and other hedge fund investment advisory businesses that we had acquired from 2010 to 2014. In the near to mid term, this segment will incur additional expenses to build the credit business and raise additional capital.
For purposes of presenting our results of operations for this segment, we include only our economic interests in the results of operations of Claren Road (through January 2017) and ESG (through June 2016). The following table presents our results of operations for our Global Credit segment:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues     
Fund level fee revenues     
Fund management fees$191.5
 $195.5
 $210.7
Portfolio advisory fees, net0.7
 1.1
 0.7
Transaction fees, net
 
 
Total fund level fee revenues192.2
 196.6
 211.4
Performance fees     
Realized75.4
 36.6
 38.0
Unrealized(16.3) 1.2
 (63.1)
Total performance fees59.1
 37.8
 (25.1)
Investment income (loss)     
Realized11.9
 5.1
 5.4
Unrealized5.4
 15.3
 (15.7)
Total investment income (loss)17.3
 20.4
 (10.3)
Interest income7.1
 4.7
 2.8
Other income6.8
 4.7
 3.9
Total revenues282.5
 264.2
 182.7
Segment Expenses     
Compensation and benefits     
Direct base compensation79.2
 87.4
 101.2
Indirect base compensation25.3
 32.6
 28.3
Equity-based compensation20.7
 17.6
 19.0
Performance fee related     
Realized35.0
 17.6
 16.6
Unrealized(7.3) 0.6
 (27.7)
Total compensation and benefits152.9
 155.8
 137.4
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses3.3
 250.0
 69.8
Depreciation and amortization expense5.1
 6.2
 5.0
Interest expense14.5
 11.3
 10.8
Total expenses175.8
 423.3
 223.0
Economic Income (Loss)$106.7
 $(159.1) $(40.3)
(-) Net Performance Fees31.4
 19.6
 (14.0)
(-) Investment Income (Loss)17.3
 20.4
 (10.3)
(+) Equity-based Compensation20.7
 17.6
 19.0
(+) Net Interest7.4
 6.6
 8.0
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies(4.1) 
 9.0
(=) Fee Related Earnings$82.0
 $(174.9) $20.0
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees40.4
 19.0
 21.4
(+) Realized Investment Income11.9
 5.1
 5.4
(+) Net Interest(7.4) (6.6) (8.0)
(=) Distributable Earnings$126.9
 $(157.4) $38.8


146






Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016 and Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Distributable Earnings
Distributable earnings increased $284.3 million Inflows for the year ended December 31, 20172022 include Fee-earning AUM associated with the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude which was effective April 1, 2022, as compared to 2016,well as Fee-earning AUM acquired in the CBAM transaction in March 2022. Inflows associated with these transactions were $48 billion and decreased $196.2 million$14 billion, respectively.
(2)Outflows represents the impact of realizations from vehicles with management fees based on remaining invested capital at cost or fair value, changes in basis for funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired during the period, reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees, gross redemptions in our open-ended funds, and run-off of CLO collateral balances. Realizations for funds earning management fees based on commitments during the period do not affect Fee-earning AUM.
(3)Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in funds or vehicles based on the lower of cost or fair value or net asset value, as well as activity of funds with fees based on gross asset value.
(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the year ended December 31, 2016period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as compared to 2015. The following table provides the components of the changes in distributable earnings for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:period end.


Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$(157.4)$38.8
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in realized net performance fees21.4
(2.4)
   Increase (decrease) in realized investment income6.8
(0.3)
   Increase (decrease) in fee related earnings256.9
(194.9)
   (Increase) decrease in net interest(0.8)1.4
   Total increase (decrease)284.3
(196.2)
Distributable earnings, current year$126.9
$(157.4)

Realized Net Performance Fees. Realized net performance fees increased $21.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and decreased $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The majority of realized net performance fees were generated by our distressed debt carry funds in 2017, our structured credit funds in 2016 and both our structured credit funds and ESG in 2015.

Realized Investment Income. Realized investment income increased $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and decreased $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The increase in realized investment income for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016Fee-earning AUM was primarily due to higher realizations on investments in our structured credit funds. The decrease in realized investment income for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to greater realized losses on our hedge funds, partially offset by higher realizations on our structured credit funds and carry funds.

Fee Related Earnings

Fee related earnings increased $256.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016, and decreased $194.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The following table provides the components of the change in fee related earnings for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:


Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$(174.9)$20.0
Increases (Decreases):  
   Decrease in fee revenues(4.4)(14.8)
   Decrease in direct and indirect base compensation15.5
9.5
   Decrease (increase) in general, administrative and
other expenses
242.6
(189.2)
   All other changes3.2
(0.4)
   Total increase (decrease)256.9
(194.9)
Fee related earnings, current year$82.0
$(174.9)


147






Fee Revenues. Total fee revenues decreased $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and decreased $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015, due to the following:

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Lower fund management fees$(4.0)$(15.2)
(Lower) higher portfolio advisory fees(0.4)0.4
Total decrease in fee revenues$(4.4)$(14.8)
The decrease in fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily due to a decrease of $30.2 million in fund management fees related to the separation from the hedge funds and lower basis on certain carry funds. These decreases were partially offset by a $24.1 million increase in fund management fees primarily as a result of increased commitments and subsequent closings for CSP IV during 2017.
The decrease in fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to lower hedge fund assets under management and lower basis on certain carry funds, partially offset by the activation of fees on our second energy mezzanine opportunity fund (“CEMOF II”). Assets under management reflects no material amounts for hedge funds at December 31, 2016, down from from $8.3$121.2 billion at December 31, 2015, primarily due to the transactions related to ESG and Claren Road in which the Partnership transferred its interests in ESG and Claren Road back to their respective founders, redemptions and investment depreciation.
The weighted average management fee rate on our carry funds decreased slightly from 1.37% at December 31, 2016 to 1.35% at December 31, 2017 primarily due to a lower blended fee rate for CSP IV upon completion2022, an increase of the fundraising process.
The weighted average management fee rate on our carry funds decreased from 1.38% at December 31, 2015 to 1.37% at December 31, 2016 primarily due to a lower blended fee rate for CEMOF II upon completion of the fundraising process. Fee-earning AUM for our hedge funds was zero as of December 31, 2016.

Direct and indirect compensation expense. Direct and indirect compensation expense decreased $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as$69.5 billion, or 134%, compared to 2016 primarily due to lower headcount from the separation of the hedge fund business, which resulted in $24.9 million of lower compensation. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in 2017 cash bonuses.
Direct and indirect base compensation decreased $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to lower headcount, partially offset by increased compensation costs of $2.8 million related to fundraising activities.
General, administrative and other indirect expenses. General, administrative and other indirect expenses decreased $242.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and increased $189.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015, primarily due to the following:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016
 (Dollars in Millions)
(Absence of) increase in commodities-related contingency reserves$(175.0)$175.0
(Absence of) expenses incurred related to Claren Road transaction(25.0)25.0
Increase in insurance recoveries related to litigation(10.0)(25.0)
Increase in professional fees, including legal costs related to commodities144.2
11.5
Increase in insurance recovery related to commodities(177.3)
All other changes0.5
2.7
Total (decrease) increase$(242.6)$189.2

148






Economic Income (Loss)
Economic income (loss) increased $265.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016, and decreased $118.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The following table provides the components of the change in economic income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Economic income (loss), prior year$(159.1)$(40.3)
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase in net performance fees11.8
33.6
   (Decrease) increase in investment income(3.1)30.7
   (Increase) decrease in equity-based compensation(3.1)1.4
   Increase (decrease) in fee related earnings256.9
(194.9)
   Increase (decrease) in net interest(0.8)1.4
   Decrease in reserve for litigation and contingencies4.1
9.0
   Total increase (decrease)265.8
(118.8)
Economic income (loss), current year$106.7
$(159.1)

Performance Fees. Performance fees (realized and unrealized) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are from the following types of funds:
 Performance Fees
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Carry funds$18.1
 $0.3
 $(62.9)
Hedge funds
 0.9
 10.5
Structured credit funds and other41.0
 36.6
 27.3
Total performance fees$59.1
 $37.8
 $(25.1)

The $59.1 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CLOs of $18.1 million, and
Carlyle Strategic Partners III, L.P. (“CSP III”) of $13.2 million.

The $37.8 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

CLOs of $19.0 million,
Carlyle Strategic Partners III, L.P. (“CSP III”) of $3.5 million,
Carlyle Strategic Partners II, L.P. (“CSP II”) of $2.6 million, and
Carlyle Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. (“CMP II”) of $(5.8) million.

The $(25.1) million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from the following funds:

our first energy mezzanine fund (“CEMOF”) of $(43.1) million,
CMP II of $(19.3) million, and
ESG funds of $7.3 million.

149







Performance fees of $59.1 million, $37.8 million, and $(25.1) million are inclusive of performance fees reversed of approximately $5.8 million, $5.8 million, and $63.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The appreciation (depreciation) in remaining value of assets for this segment's carry funds are as follows:


Year Ended December 31,

201720162015
Carry funds11%(11)%(8)%

Net performance fees as a percentage of total performance fees are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201720162015
 (Dollars in millions)
Net Performance Fees$31.4
$19.6
$(14.0)
    
Percentage of Total Performance Fees53%52%56%

The increase in net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 is primarily due to increased performance fees generated from our carry funds and business development companies in 2017 as compared to 2016. The increase in net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 is primarily due to increased performance fees generated from our business development companies in 2016 as compared to 2015.

Total Investment Income (Loss). Total investment income (realized and unrealized) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $17.3 million compared to total investment income of $20.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in investment income from 2016 to 2017 relates primarily to lower appreciation on certain U.S. and Euro-denominated collateralized loan obligations during 2017 as compared to 2016. This decrease was partially offset by appreciation on our carry funds in 2017 as compared to depreciation on our carry funds in 2016 and higher realizations on our structured credit funds and carry funds in 2017 as compared to 2016.
Total investment income was $20.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to total investment loss of $10.3 million in 2015. The increase in total investment income from 2015 to 2016 relates primarily to appreciation on certain U.S. and Euro-denominated collateralized loan obligations during 2016 as compared to depreciation on investments in U.S.-denominated collateralized loan obligations for 2015.
Equity-based Compensation. Equity-based compensation was $20.7 million, $17.6 million, and $19.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies. Global Credit's share of the reserve for litigation and contingencies decreased $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily related to Global Credit's share of the $25 million reserve reversal related to the CCC litigation recognized in 2017. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the CCC litigation. Global Credit had recognized its share of a $50 million reserve for litigation and contingencies for $9.0 million in 2015.


150






Fee-earning AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2017
Fee-earning AUM is presented below for each period together with the components of change during each respective period.
The table below breaks out Fee-earning AUM by its respective components at each period.
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Credit   
Components of Fee-earning AUM (1)   
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$5,026
 $4,010
 $2,298
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital1,457
 1,278
 1,601
Fee-earning AUM based on collateral balances, at par18,625
 16,999
 17,896
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value42
 
 7,811
Fee-earning AUM based on other (2)2,112
 1,839
 1,366
Total Fee-earning AUM$27,262
 $24,126
 $30,972
Weighted Average Management Fee Rates (3)   
All Funds, excluding CLOs1.35% 1.37% 1.52%
(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Includes funds with fees based on gross asset value.
(3)Represents the aggregate effective management fee rate for carry funds and hedge funds, weighted by each fund’s Fee-earning AUM, as of the end of each period presented. Management fees for CLOs are based on the total par amount of the assets (collateral) and principal balance of the notes in the fund and are not calculated as a percentage of equity and are therefore not included.
The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Fee-earning AUM.
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Credit   
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward   
Balance, Beginning of Period$24,126
 $30,972
 $33,898
Acquisitions/(Divestments) (1)
 (4,356) 
Inflows, including Fee-paying Commitments (2)1,413
 1,901
 2,422
Outflows, including Distributions (3)(265) (668) (1,025)
Subscriptions, net of Redemptions (4)
 (2,764) (4,327)
Changes in CLO collateral balances (5)843
 (714) 850
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (6)13
 (475) (674)
Foreign Exchange and other (7)1,132
 230
 (172)
Balance, End of Period$27,262
 $24,126
 $30,972
(1)Divestment activity represents ESG assets which were transferred to the ESG founders in a transaction that closed in October 2016 and Claren Road assets which were transferred to the Claren Road founders in a transaction that closed in January 2017.
(2)Inflows represent limited partner capital raised and capital invested by our carry funds outside the investment period.
(3)Outflows represent limited partner distributions from our carry funds, changes in fee basis for our carry funds where the investment period has expired, and reductions for funds that are no longer calling fees.
(4)
Represents the net result of subscriptions to and redemptions from our hedge funds and mutual fund.
(5)
Represents the change in the aggregate Fee-earning collateral balances at par of our CLOs/structured products, as of the quarterly cut-off dates.

151






(6)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value.
(7)
Includes activity of funds with fees based on gross asset value. Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.

Fee-earning AUM was $27.3$51.7 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $3.2 billion, or 13%, compared to $24.1 billion at December 31, 2016.2021. Driving the increase were inflows of $1.4$78.1 billion primarily attributablefrom Fee-earning AUM related to new fee-paying commitments raisedthe strategic advisory services agreement signed with Fortitude in CSP IV. Also drivingApril 2022 and Fee-earning AUM acquired in the CBAM transaction in March 2022, as well as investment activity in CCOF II, the activation of fees and investment activity in Aviation, and the closing of our six latest vintage U.S. CLOs and three latest vintage Europe CLOs. This increase was foreign exchange and other activityminimally offset by outflows of $1.1$6.8 billion primarily relateddue to foreign exchange gains on our Euro-denominated CLO'sreductions for funds that are no longer calling for management fees, realizations in other funds with fees tied to invested capital, and increases inrun-off of our CLO collateral balances, as well as $1.1 billion of $0.8 billion.portfolio depreciation. Distributions from carry funds still in the investment period do not impact Fee-earning AUM as these funds are based on commitments and not invested capital.

Fee-earning AUM was $51.7 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $9.6 billion, or 23%, compared to $42.1 billion at December 31, 2020. Driving the increase were inflows of $13.0 billion primarily attributable to new fee-paying capital raised in our U.S. and Europe CLOs and investment activity in our opportunistic credit funds, as well as $1.5 billion of market and other activity. Partially offsetting the increase were $4.3 billion of outflows primarily related to run-off of our CLO collateral balances and dispositions from funds which charge fees on invested capital.
Fee-earning AUM was $24.1$42.1 billion at December 31, 2016, a decrease2020, an increase of $6.9$4.2 billion, or 22%11%, compared to $31.0$37.9 billion at December 31, 2015. This was2019. Driving the increase were inflows of $6.4 billion primarily attributable to new fee-paying capital raised in our U.S. and Europe CLOs, fee-paying third-party capital raised in our insurance business, and investment activity in CCOF I, as well as $1.2 billion in foreign exchange activity related to the result of the divestmentstranslation of our ESG and Claren Road hedge fund businesses which were sold backEUR-denominated CLOs to their founders in separate transactions which closed in October 2016 and January 2017, respectively, and resulted in a decline in Fee-earning AUM of $4.4 billion. Also driving the decrease were net redemptions in our hedge funds of $2.8 billion and decreases in our CLO collateral balances of $0.7 billion.USD. Partially offsetting this decrease was $1.9the increase were $3.9 billion of inflowsoutflows primarily related to new commitments raised in CSP IV and CEMOF II.

Fee-earning AUM was $31.0 billion at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $2.9 billion, or 9%, compared to $33.9 billion at December 31, 2014. This was driven by $4.3 billion of net redemptions in our hedge funds, $1.0 billion of net outflows including distributions, primarily due to the change infee basis from commitments to invested equity in CSP III and our first energy mezzanine fund (“CEMOF I”), and $0.7 billion in market depreciation. This was partially offset by $2.4 billion of inflows, including commitments, primarily driven by new commitmentsstep-down in CEMOF II and a $0.9 billion increase in the collateral balancesrun-off of our CLO's.CLO collateral balances.

144


Total AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20172022
The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Total AUM.
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Credit
Total AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$73,384 $55,881 $49,412 
Inflows(1)
78,277 16,933 9,497 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(5,741)(4,171)(4,167)
Market Activity & Other(3)
991 5,403 402 
Foreign Exchange(4)
(609)(662)737 
Balance, End of Period$146,302 $73,384 $55,881 
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Credit     
Total AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$29,399
 $35,255
 $36,741
Acquisitions/(Divestments) (1)
 (4,707) 
New Commitments (2)6,643
 7,115
 8,545
Outflows (3)(3,981) (7,506) (9,030)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (4)177
 (1,045) (945)
Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) (5)829
 (190) (609)
Other (6)257
 477
 553
Balance, End of Period$33,324
 $29,399
 $35,255


(1)Divestment activity represents ESG assets which were transferred to the ESG founders in a transaction that closed in October 2016 and Claren Road assets which were transferred to the Claren Road founders in a transaction that closed in January 2017.
(2)
New Commitments reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing.
(3)Outflows includes distributions in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles and separately managed accounts, as well as runoff of CLO collateral balances and redemptions in our hedge funds.
(4)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, separately managed accounts and hedge funds.

(1)Inflows reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing. Inflows for the year ended December 31, 2022 include AUM associated with the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude which was effective April 1, 2022, as well as AUM acquired in the CBAM transaction in March 2022. Inflows associated with these transactions were $48 billion and $15 billion, respectively.
152(2)Outflows includes distributions net of recallable or recyclable amounts in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, gross redemptions in our open-end funds, run-off of CLO collateral balances, and the expiration of available capital.



(3)Market Activity & Other generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, as well as the impact of fees, expenses and non-investment income, change in gross asset value for our business development companies and other changes in AUM.

(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.


(5)
Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(6)Includes expiring available capital, the impact of capital calls for fees and expenses, change in gross asset value for our business development companies and other changes in AUM.
Total AUM was $33.3$146.3 billion at December 31, 2017,2022, an increase of $3.9$72.9 billion, or 13%99%, compared to $29.4$73.4 billion at December 31, 2016.2021. The increase was driven by $78.3 billion of inflows primarily from AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement signed with Fortitude in April 2022, third party capital capital raised from a strategic third-party investor which directly invests in Fortitude, AUM acquired in the CBAM transaction in March 2022, the closing of our six latest vintage U.S. CLOs and three latest vintage Europe CLOs, and the first closing in CCOF III. The increase was minimally offset by outflows of $5.7 billion due to run-off of CLO and other collateral balances and distributions in our carry funds, namely in our Energy Credit and Opportunistic Credit funds.
Total AUM was $73.4 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $17.5 billion, or 31%, compared to $55.9 billion at December 31, 2020. This was driven by $6.6$16.9 billion of new commitmentsinflows primarily due to new U.S. and Europe CLO issuances, as well as fundraising in CSCCCOF II and CCOF.various platform accounts. Also contributing todriving the increase were foreign exchange gainswas $5.4 billion of $0.8 billionmarket and other activity attributable to 22% appreciation in our Euro-denominated CLO's.carry funds and increases in the gross asset value of our BDCs and securitization vehicles. Partially offsetting the increase were outflows of $4.0$4.2 billion primarily related to run-off of our CLO run-offcollateral balances and distributions in our GlobalDistressed Credit carryand Energy Credit funds.
Total AUM was $29.4$55.9 billion at December 31, 2016, a decrease2020, an increase of $5.9$6.5 billion, or 17%13%, compared to $35.3$49.4 billion at December 31, 2015.2019. This decrease was due to outflowsdriven by $9.5 billion of $7.5 billion which were the result of CLO run-off, hedge fund redemptions, and distributions in our carry funds. Also driving the decrease were divestments of our ESG and Claren Road hedge fund businesses which were sold back to their founders in separate transactions which closed in October 2016 and January 2017, respectively, and resulted in a decline in Total AUM of $4.7 billion. Market depreciation for the period of $1.0 billion represented a 11% ($0.2 billion) decrease on our portfolio of carry funds for the period and declines in our hedge funds. Partially offsetting this decrease were new commitments of $7.1 billioninflows primarily due to new U.S. and Europe CLO issuances, fundraising in CCOF II, and closings in various platform accounts. Also driving the increase was $0.7 billion in foreign exchange activity related to the translation of our EUR-denominated CLOs to USD. Partially offsetting the increase were outflows of $4.2 billion primarily related to distributions in our Energy Credit and Aviation funds, as well as fundraising in CSP IV and CEMOF II.CLO run-off.
Total AUM was $35.3 billion at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1.4 billion, or 4%, compared to $36.7 billion at December 31, 2014. This decrease was driven by outflows of $9.0 billion primarily attributable to redemptions from our hedge funds and CLO run-off, $0.9 billion of market depreciation, representing a 8% ($0.2 billion) decrease on our portfolio of carry funds for the period and declines in our hedge funds, and $0.6 billion of foreign exchange decreases in our Euro-denominated CLOs. Partially offsetting these decreases were $8.5 billion of new commitments primarily attributable to new U.S. and Europe CLO issuances, as well as new funds raised in CEMOF II.
145


Fund Performance Metrics
Fund performance information for certain of our Global Credit Funds is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund return information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns. See “ItemPart I. Item 1A. Risk Factors — “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations — Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common units.stock.

153146







The following table reflects the performance of certain funds in our Global Credit business. These tables separately present funds that, as of the periods presented, had at least $1.0 billion in capital commitments, cumulative equity invested or total equity value. See “Business — Part I. Item 1. “Business—Our Family of Funds”Global Investment Offerings” for a legend of the fund acronyms listed below.
 TOTAL INVESTMENTS
(Dollars in millions) As of December 31, 2022
Fund (Fee Initiation Date/Stepdown Date) (11)Committed Capital (12)Cumulative Invested Capital (1)Percent InvestedRealized
Value (2)
Remaining Fair Value (3)MOIC (4)Gross IRR (5)(8)Net IRR (6)(8)Net Accrued Carry/(Giveback) (7)
CSP IV (Apr 2016 / Dec 2020)$2,500 $2,500 100%$843 $2,351 1.3x14%7%$— 
CSP III (Dec 2011 / Aug 2015)$703 $703 100%$929 $57 1.4x19%9%$— 
CSP II (Dec 2007 / Jun 2011)$1,352 $1,352 100%$2,431 $66 1.8x17%11%$
CCOF II (Nov 2020 / Oct 2025)$4,425 $4,408 100%$384 $4,477 1.1x15%10$33 
CCOF I (Nov 2017 / Sep 2022)$2,373 $3,452 145%$2,427 $2,120 1.3x19%13%$44 
CEMOF II (Dec 2015 / Jun 2019)$1,692 $1,713 101%$1,789 $376 1.3x8%3%$— 
SASOF III (Nov 2014 / n/a)$833 $991 119%$1,192 $101 1.3x19%11%$12 
All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (9)$7,976 n/a$1,536 $6,101 1.0xNMNM$
Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (10)$5,230 n/a$5,642 $1.1x3%Neg$— 
TOTAL GLOBAL CREDIT CARRY FUNDS$28,325 n/a$17,172 $15,649 1.2x10%4%$102 
 
 
 
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2017
Inception to December 31, 2017
Global Credit (Carry Funds Only)
Fund
Inception
Date (1)
 Committed
Capital
 Cumulative
Invested Capital (2)
 Total Fair
Value (3)
 MOIC (4) Gross IRR (5) (10) Net IRR (6) (10)


(Reported in Local Currency, in Millions)
 
 
Fully Invested/Committed Funds (7)













CSP II
6/2007
$1,352.3

$1,352.3

$2,465.6

1.8x
17%
11%
CSP III
8/2011
$702.8

$702.8

$1,163.4

1.7x
32%
20%
CEMOF I
12/2010
$1,382.5

$1,599.9

$1,419.4

0.9x
Neg

Neg
All Other Funds (8)





$1,438.5

$1,998.3

1.4x
12%
7%
Coinvestments and Other (9)





$976.4

$938.6

1.0x
NM

NM
Total Fully Invested/Committed Funds
$6,069.9

$7,985.3

1.3x
12%
6%
Funds in the Investment Period (7)













CSP IV
3/2016
$2,500.0

$661.4

$766.7

1.2x
NM

NM
CEMOF II
2/2015
$2,819.2

$878.4

$933.1

1.1x
NM

NM
All Other Funds





$173.9

$179.5

1.0x
NM

NM
Total Funds in the Investment Period





$1,713.7

$1,879.3

1.1x
NM

NM
TOTAL Global Credit





$7,783.6

$9,864.6

1.3x
12%
6%
(1)    Represents the original cost of investments since the inception of the fund. For CSP II and CSP III, reflects amounts net of investment level recallable proceeds which is adjusted to reflect recyclability of invested capital for the purpose of calculating the fund MOIC.
(2)    Represents all realized proceeds since inception of the fund.
(1)The data presented herein that provides “inception to date” performance results of our segments relates to the period following the formation of the first fund within each segment. For our Global Credit segment our first carry fund was formed in 2004.
(2)
(3)    Represents the original cost of all capital called for investments since inception of the fund.
(3)
Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(4)Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(5)Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(6)Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value after management fees, expenses and carried interest, and may include remaining escrow values for realized investments.
(4)    Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(5)    Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents an annualized time-weighted return on Limited Partner invested capital, based on contributions, distributions and unrealized fair value as of the reporting date, before the impact of management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest. For fund vintages 2017 and after, Gross IRR includes the impact of interest expense related to the funding of investments on fund lines of credit. Gross IRR is calculated based on the timing of Limited Partner cash flows, which may differ to varying degrees from the timing of actual investment cash flows for the fund. Subtotal Gross IRR aggregations for multiple funds are calculated based on actual cash flow dates for each fund and represent a theoretical time-weighted return for a Limited Partner who invested sequentially in each fund.
(6)    Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents an annualized time-weighted return on Limited Partner invested capital, based on contributions, distributions and unrealized fair value as of the reporting date, after the impact of all management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest, including current accruals. Net IRR is calculated based on the timing of Limited Partner cash flows, which may differ to varying degrees from the timing of actual investment cash flows for the fund. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance fees with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund.
(7)
Fully Invested funds are past the expiration date of the investment period as defined in the respective limited partnership agreement. In instances where a successor fund has had its first capital call, the predecessor fund is categorized as fully invested.
(8)Aggregate includes the following funds: CMP I, CMP II, CSP I, and CASCOF.
(9)Includes co-investments and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us.
(10)
For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is negative as of reporting period end.

154






 Remaining Fair Value (1)Unrealized MOIC (2)Total MOIC (3)% Invested (4)In Accrued Carry/ (Giveback) (5)LTM Realized Carry (6)Catch up RateFee Initiation Date (7)Quarters Since Fee InitiationOriginal Investment Period End Date
 As of December 31, 2017
Global Credit         
CEMOF II$892.4
1.0x1.1x31%
 100%Dec-159
Feb-20
CEMOF I$859.2
0.6x0.9x116%

100%Dec-1029
Dec-15
CSP IV$633.6
1.1x1.2x26%X
100%Feb-174
Jun-20
CSP III$324.8
1.1x1.7x100%XX80%Dec-1125
Aug-15
All Other Funds (8)$366.1
0.9x1.6x
NMNM



Co-investment and Other (9)$797.4
0.8x1.0x
NMNM



Total Global Credit$3,873.5
0.8x1.3x






(1)Remaining Fair Value reflects the unrealized carrying value of investments in carry funds and related co-investment vehicles. Significant funds with remaining fair value of greater than $100 million are listed individually.
(2)
Unrealized multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents remaining fair market value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by investment cost.
(3)Total MOIC represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital. For certain funds, represents the original cost of investments net of investment-level recallable proceeds, which is adjusted to reflect recyclability of invested capital for the purpose of calculating the fund MOIC.
(4)
Represents cumulative equity invested as of the reporting period divided by total commitments. Amount can be greater than 100% due to the re-investment of recallable distributions to fund investors.
(5)Fund has accrued carry/(giveback) as of the reporting period.
(6)
Fund has realized carry in the last twelve months.
(7)Represents the date of the first capital contribution for management fees.
(8)
Aggregate includes the following funds: CSP I, CSP II, CMP I, CMP II, CSC, CCOF, and CASCOF. In Accrued Carry/(Clawback) and LTM Realized Carry not indicated because the indicator does not apply to each fund within the aggregate.
(9)
Includes co-investments, prefund investments and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us. In Accrued Carry/(Giveback) and LTM Realized Carry not indicated because the indicator does not apply to each fund within the aggregate.



155






Investment Solutions
In February 2016, we decided to restructure our Investment Solutions segment to focus on private market secondaries, primary investments, co-investment and managed account activities and, given the challenging market environment, discontinue our fund of hedge funds and liquid alternative initiatives. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance revenues with a blended Net IRR that is below the Partnershippreferred return hurdle for that fund. Subtotal Net IRR aggregations for multiple funds are calculated based on actual cash flow dates for each fund and represent a theoretical time-weighted return for a Limited Partner who invested sequentially in each fund.
(7)    Represents the net accrued performance fee balance/(giveback obligation) as of the current quarter end.
(8)    For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is considered meaningful but is negative as of reporting period end.
(9)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments arranged by us: SASOF IV, SASOF V, CALF and CICF.
(10)    Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMA's), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CSP I, CEMOF I, CSC, CMP I, CMP II, SASOF II, and CASCOF.
(11)    The fund stepdown date represents the contractual stepdown date under the respective fund agreements for funds on which the fee basis stepdown has substantially wound down the operationsnot yet occurred. Funds without a listed Fee Initiation Date and Stepdown Date have not yet initiated fees.
147


(12)    All amounts shown represent total capital commitments as of DGAM.December 31, 2022. Certain of our recent vintage funds are currently in fundraising and total capital commitments are subject to change. Committed Capital for CEMOF II reflects original committed capital of $2.8 billion, less $1.1 billion in commitments which were extinguished following a Key Person Event.

Global Investment Solutions
The following table presents our results of operations for our Global Investment Solutions(1) segment:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$222.9 $228.4 $193.0 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other— 0.5 0.1 
Total fund level fee revenues222.9 228.9 193.1 
Realized performance revenues192.6 186.8 155.1 
Realized principal investment income3.8 9.8 2.3 
Interest income2.6 0.2 0.6 
Total revenues421.9 425.7 351.1 
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits111.7 108.2 113.5 
Realized performance revenues related compensation169.4 168.1 144.6 
Total compensation and benefits281.1 276.3 258.1 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses36.8 32.0 37.8 
Depreciation and amortization expense5.1 4.5 4.5 
Interest expense11.0 10.8 9.3 
Total expenses334.0 323.6 309.7 
(=) Distributable Earnings$87.9 $102.1 $41.4 
(-) Realized Net Performance Revenues23.2 18.7 10.5 
(-) Realized Principal Investment Income3.8 9.8 2.3 
(+) Net Interest8.4 10.6 8.7 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$69.3 $84.2 $37.3 
(1) On April 1, 2021, we closed on the sale of our interest in Metropolitan Real Estate (“MRE”). Distributable Earnings and Fee Related Earnings attributable to MRE in periods prior to the sale were immaterial to the Global Investment Solutions segment:segment. The $5.0 million gain on the sale and the $26.8 million right-of-use asset impairment, as a result of the sublease transaction (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), are not included in DE or FRE. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for the reconciliation of Total DE and FRE to the U.S. GAAP financial statements.
148
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues     
Fund level fee revenues     
Fund management fees$154.9
 $140.3
 $153.9
Portfolio advisory fees, net
 0.8
 
Total fund level fee revenues154.9
 141.1
 153.9
Performance fees
 
 
Realized86.4
 65.6
 24.1
Unrealized56.0
 38.2
 103.6
Total performance fees142.4
 103.8
 127.7
Investment income (loss)
 
 
Realized0.1
 0.1
 0.1
Unrealized3.9
 (0.3) 0.2
Total investment income (loss)4.0
 (0.2) 0.3
Interest income1.1
 0.4
 0.2
Other income0.4
 0.5
 0.9
Total revenues302.8
 245.6
 283.0
Segment Expenses
 
 
Compensation and benefits
 
 
Direct base compensation72.0
 66.8
 82.3
Indirect base compensation12.7
 13.7
 13.0
Equity-based compensation7.8
 6.4
 12.4
Performance fee related
 
 
Realized83.2
 63.2
 20.3
Unrealized33.8
 27.6
 94.8
Total compensation and benefits209.5
 177.7
 222.8
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses32.3
 34.5
 46.0
Depreciation and amortization expense3.6
 3.3
 3.8
Interest expense6.1
 5.8
 5.9
Total expenses251.5
 221.3
 278.5
Economic Income$51.3
 $24.3
 $4.5
(-) Net Performance Fees25.4
 13.0
 12.6
(-) Investment Income (Loss)4.0
 (0.2) 0.3
(+) Equity-based Compensation7.8
 6.4
 12.4
(+) Net Interest5.0
 5.4
 5.7
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies(2.6) 
 5.0
(=) Fee Related Earnings$32.1
 $23.3
 $14.7
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees3.2
 2.4
 3.8
(+) Realized Investment Income0.1
 0.1
 0.1
(+) Net Interest(5.0) (5.4) (5.7)
(=) Distributable Earnings$30.4
 $20.4
 $12.9



156







Year Ended December 31, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162021 and Year Ended December 31, 20162021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20152020


Distributable Earnings
Distributable earnings increased $10.0decreased $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and increased $7.5$60.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the change in distributable earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:

Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$102.1 $41.4 
Increases (decreases):
(Decrease) increase in fee related earnings(14.9)46.9 
Increase in realized net performance revenues4.5 8.2 
(Decrease) increase in realized principal investment income(6.0)7.5 
Decrease (increase) in net interest2.2 (1.9)
Total (decrease) increase(14.2)60.7 
Distributable earnings, current year$87.9 $102.1 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Distributable earnings, prior year$20.4
$12.9
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in realized net performance fees0.8
(1.4)
   Increase in fee related earnings8.8
8.6
   Decrease in net interest0.4
0.3
   Total increase10.0
7.5
Distributable earnings, current year$30.4
$20.4

Realized Net Performance Fees. RealizedRevenues. Global Investment Solutions had realized performance revenues of $192.6 million, $186.8 million and $155.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. However, most of these realizations are from AlpInvest fund vehicles in which we generally do not retain carried interest. Therefore, our realized net performance fees increased $0.8revenues were $23.2 million, $18.7 million and $10.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As funds that have launched since our acquisition of AlpInvest in 2011 begin to realize performance revenues, which will not occur until all capital contributions for investments and expenses and the preferred return hurdle have been returned, an increasing share of net realized performance revenues will be for our benefit.
Realized Principal Investment Income. Realized principal investment income decreased $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021 and decreased $1.4increased $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015. Substantially all of the realized net performance fees were generated from the AlpInvest carry fund vehicles for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

2020, primarily due to investments in our secondary funds.
Fee Related Earnings

Fee related earnings increased $8.8decreased $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, and increased $8.6$46.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015.2020. The following table provides the components of the change in fee related earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:


Year Ended December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$84.2 $37.3 
Increases (decreases):
(Decrease) increase in fee revenues(6.0)35.8 
(Increase) decrease in cash-based compensation(3.5)5.3 
(Increase) decrease in general, administrative and other indirect expenses(4.8)5.8 
Total (decrease) increase(14.9)46.9 
Fee related earnings, current year$69.3 $84.2 

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Fee related earnings, prior year$23.3
$14.7
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase (decrease) in fee revenues13.8
(12.8)
   (Increase) decrease in direct and indirect base
compensation
(4.2)14.8
   (Increase) decrease in general, administrative and
other expenses
(0.4)6.5
   All other changes(0.4)0.1
   Total increase8.8
8.6
Fee related earnings, current year$32.1
$23.3


Fee Revenues. Total fee revenues increased $13.8decreased $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to increased management fees from our private equity fund vehicles as a resultthe negative impact of closingsforeign currency translation and the sale of new fund vehicles, which have a higher average management fee rate than older fund vehicles, as well as $1.2 million of catch-upMRE in April 2021, partially offset by management fees in 2017. Fee revenues also benefited from favorable foreign currency adjustments during 2017. This increase is partially offset byour latest coinvestment fund, which activated fees in the wind-downsecond quarter of DGAM and the related redemptions from its fund of hedge funds, which decreased our fee revenues by $5.6 million in 2017 as compared to 2016.


2021.
157
149








Total fee revenues decreased $12.8increased $35.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, primarily due to increased management fees driven by the wind-downactivation of DGAMmanagement fees on our latest secondaries fund in the second quarter of 2020 and our latest coinvestment fund in the related redemptions from its fundsecond quarter of hedge funds, which decreased our fee revenues by $10.92021, as well as $4.4 million in 2016.catch-up management fees. These increases were partially offset by the impact of the sale of MRE on April 1, 2021, which resulted in a $15.9 million decrease in management fees.
    
Direct    Cash-based compensation and indirectbenefits expense. Cash-based compensation expense. Direct and indirect compensationbenefits expense increased $4.2$3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to an increase in 2017 cash bonuses.bonuses, partially offset by a decrease in cash-based compensation and benefits expense as a result of the MRE sale.
DirectCash-based compensation and indirect base compensationbenefits expense decreased $14.8$5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015,2020, primarily due to lower headcount in 2016 resulting fromas a result of the wind-down of DGAM,MRE sale on April 1, 2021, partially offset by higher compensation associated with fundraising activities of $4.1 millionan increase in 2016 versus 2015.cash bonuses.


General, administrative and other indirect expenses.General, administrative and other indirect expenses increased $0.4$4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to negative foreign currency adjustments, partially offset by lowerhigher professional fees and lower external costs associated with fundraising activities.travel and other general expenses.
General, administrative and other indirect expenses decreased $6.5$9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20162021 as compared to 2015, primarily due to lower professional fees, information technology and real estate costs, partially offset by lower foreign currency gains in 2016 as compared to 2015.
Economic Income
Economic income increased $27.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016 and increased $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015. The following table provides a rollforward of economic income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Year Ended December 31,

20172016

(Dollars in Millions)
Economic income, prior year$24.3
$4.5
Increases (decreases):  
   Increase in net performance fees12.4
0.4
   Increase (decrease) in investment income4.2
(0.5)
   (Increase) decrease in equity-based compensation(1.4)6.0
   Increase in fee related earnings8.8
8.6
   Decrease in net interest0.4
0.3
   Decrease in reserve for litigation and contingencies2.6
5.0
   Total increase27.0
19.8
Economic income, current year$51.3
$24.3
Performance Fees. Performance fees (realized and unrealized) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are from the following types of funds:
 Performance Fees
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Private equity fund vehicles$138.5
 $103.3
 $125.6
Fund of hedge fund vehicles
 
 0.4
Real estate fund vehicles3.9
 0.5
 1.7
Total performance fees$142.4
 $103.8
 $127.7

158






Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management team of AlpInvest, we generally do not retain any carried interest in respect of the historical investments and commitments to our AlpInvest fund vehicles that existed as of July 1, 2011 (including any options to increase any such commitments exercised after such date). We are entitled to 15% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020 and 40% of the carried interest in respect of all other commitments (including all future commitments from third parties).

The increase in performance fees in 2017 as compared to 2016 is primarily due to higher realizations in our carry funds in 2017. Additionally, overall, our carry funds appreciated 10% in 2017 (excluding, excluding the impact of foreign currency, appreciation was 19% for 2017), while appreciating 12%litigation cost recoveries in 2016.

The decrease in performance fees in 2016 as compared to 2015 is2020, primarily due to lower appreciation in our carry funds in 2016. Our carry funds appreciated 12% in 2016 as compared to 23% in 2015.

The $142.4 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 was driven by performance fees recognized from a variety of funds, the largest of which are listed below:

Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2014-2015) of $17.3 million,
Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2012-2013) of $11.8 million, and
Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2009-2010) of $11.3 million.

The $103.8 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from a variety of funds, the largest of which are listed below:

Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2012-2013) of $19.2 million,
Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2009-2010) of $16.0 million, and
Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2014-2015) of $10.8 million.

The $127.7 million of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 was driven primarily by performance fees recognized from a variety of funds, the largest of which are listed below:

Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2012-2013) of $27.1 million,
Co-investment Fund & Secondaries Fund (2009-2010) of $22.6 million, and
Partnership Fund (2008) of $12.2 million.

Performance fees of $142.4 million, $103.8 million, and $127.7 million are inclusive of performance fees reversed of approximately $2.4 million and $11.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. There were no significant performance fees reversed for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The appreciation in remaining value of our Investment Solutions carry funds for this segment are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

201720162015
Carry funds10%12%23%

Note: The appreciation presented is a weighted average blend of the remaining investments in the respective carry funds within Investment Solutions. These carry funds include private equity and real estate investments in primary fund, co-investment and secondaries strategies, which have different return profiles.

Net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $25.4 million, representing an increase of $12.4 million from $13.0 million in net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016. Net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $13.0 million, representing an increase of $0.4 million from $12.6 million in net performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Equity-based Compensation. Equity-based compensation was $7.8 million, $6.4 million, and $12.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

159






Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies. Investment Solutions' share of the reserve for litigation and contingencies decreased $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily related to Investment Solutions' share of the $25 million reserve reversal related to the CCC litigation recognized in 2017. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the CCC litigation. Investment Solutions had recognized its sharesale of a $50 million reserve for litigation and contingencies for $5.0 million in 2015.MRE.

Fee-earning AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20172022
Fee-earning AUM is presented below for each period together with the components of change during each respective period.
The table below breaks out Fee-earning AUM by its respective components during the period.
 As of December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Investment Solutions
Components of Fee-earning AUM(1)
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$19,590 $18,548 $17,871 
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital(2)
4,985 4,495 2,319 
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value3,783 3,652 3,180 
Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair market value9,189 10,754 13,028 
Total Fee-earning AUM$37,547 $37,449 $36,398 
(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Includes amounts committed to or reserved for certain funds.
 Year Ended Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Investment Solutions
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$37,449 $36,398 $28,384 
Inflows(1)
4,494 8,582 10,713 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(3,280)(8,122)(3,710)
Market Activity & Other(3)
537 2,070 (778)
Foreign Exchange(4)
(1,653)(1,479)1,789 
Balance, End of Period$37,547 $37,449 $36,398 
(1)Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period and the fee-earning commitments invested in
150


 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Investment Solutions 
Components of Fee-earning AUM (1) 
Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments$11,330
 $9,047
 $7,421
Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital (2)1,230
 1,443
 1,222
Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value842
 692
 1,823
Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair market value16,748
 15,872
 17,725
Total Fee-earning AUM$30,150
 $27,054
 $28,191
vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM.

(1)For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Fee-earning Assets under Management.”
(2)Includes amounts committed to or reserved for certain AlpInvest and Metropolitan carry funds.
(2)Outflows represents the impact of realizations from vehicles with management fees based on remaining invested capital at cost or fair value, changes in basis for funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired during the period, and reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees. Distributions for funds earning management fees based on commitments during the period do not affect Fee-earning AUM. Outflows during the year ended December 31, 2021 also reflect the sale of MRE on April 1, 2021, which had $2.3 billion of Fee-earning AUM as of March 31, 2021.
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Investment Solutions 
Fee-earning AUM Rollforward 
Balance, Beginning of Period$27,054
 $28,191
 $33,082
Acquisitions
 
 
Inflows, including Commitments (1)6,234
 7,213
 5,677
Outflows, including Distributions (2)(5,776) (6,150) (7,406)
Subscriptions, net of Redemptions (3)
 (2,166) (201)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (4)(207) 594
 (205)
Foreign Exchange and other (5)2,845
 (628) (2,756)
Balance, End of Period$30,150
 $27,054
 $28,191
(3)Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value.
(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(1)Inflows represent mandates where commitment fee period was activated and capital invested by carry fund vehicles outside the commitment fee period or weighted-average investment period.
(2)Outflows represent distributions from carry fund vehicles outside the commitment fee period or weighted-average investment period and changes in fee basis for carry fund vehicles where the commitment fee period or weighted-average investment period has expired.
(3)Represents subscriptions and redemptions in our fund of hedge funds vehicles.
(4)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) represents changes in the net asset value of our fund of hedge funds vehicles and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on our carry fund vehicles based on the lower of cost or fair value.
(5)Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
Fee-earning AUM was $30.2of $37.5 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $3.1 billion, or 11%,2022 was relatively flat compared to $27.1$37.4 billion at December 31, 2016. This increase was driven by inflows2021. Inflows of $6.2$4.5 billion primarily relatedattributable to the activation of fee-

160






paying mandatesfundraising, capital deployed in our AlpInvest funds which charge fees based on invested capital, and $2.8$0.5 billion of foreignmarket appreciation were offset by outflows of $3.3 billion primarily attributable to distributions. Foreign exchange gainsactivity related to the translation of our AlpInvest Fee-earning AUM from EUR to USD. Partially offsetting this increase were outflowsUSD resulted in a decrease in Fee-earning AUM of $5.8 billion primarily attributable to distributions in our AlpInvest funds.$1.7 billion. Distributions from funds still in the commitment or weighted-average investment period do not impact Fee-earning AUM as these funds are based on commitments and not invested capital. Increases in fair value may have an impact on Fee-earning AUM for Global Investment Solutions as the management fees for many fully committed funds are based on fair value or on the lower of cost or fair value of the underlying investments.
Fee-earning AUM was $27.1$37.4 billion at December 31, 2016, a decrease2021, an increase of $1.1$1.0 billion, or 4%3%, compared to $28.2$36.4 billion at December 31, 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease was driven by inflows of $8.6 billion primarily attributable to fundraising, capital deployed in our funds which charge fees based on invested capital, and $2.1 billion of market appreciation. Partially offsetting this increase were outflows of $6.2$8.1 billion which were primarily dueattributable to distributions in our AlpInvest funds, as well as the AlpInvest and Metropolitan funds outsidesale of their commitment or weighted-average investment periods, in addition to the reduction in basis from commitments to invested equity for those funds that reached the end of their commitment period. Also driving the decrease was $2.2 billion of net redemptions, and $0.6 billion in foreignMRE. Foreign exchange attributableactivity related to the translation of our AlpInvest Fee-earning AUM from EUR to USD. Partially offsetting theUSD resulted in a decrease were inflowsin Fee-earning AUM of $7.2 billion primarily from fundraising efforts in our AlpInvest Primary and Secondaries product lines and market appreciation of $0.6 billion in our AlpInvest and Metropolitan carry funds.$1.5 billion.
Fee-earning AUM was $28.2$36.4 billion at December 31, 2015, a decrease2020, an increase of $4.9$8.0 billion, or 15%28%, compared to $33.1$28.4 billion at December 31, 2014.2019. This decreaseincrease was driven by outflowsinflows of $7.4$10.7 billion primarily attributable to fundraising in our AlpInvest funds as well as capital deployed in our AlpInvest funds which were primarily due to distributions in the AlpInvest and Metropolitan funds outside of their commitment or weighted-average investment periods, in addition to the reduction in basis from commitments tocharge fees based on invested equity for those funds that reached the end of their commitment period. Also driving the decrease was $2.8 billion in foreigncapital. Foreign exchange attributableactivity related to the translation of our AlpInvest fee-earningFee-earning AUM from EUR to USD.USD resulted in an increase in Fee-earning AUM of $1.8 billion. Partially offsetting the decreasethis increase were inflowsoutflows of $5.7$3.7 billion primarily attributable to distributions in our AlpInvest and Metropolitan funds.
Total AUM as of and for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20172022
The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Total AUM.

 Year Ended Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Investment Solutions
Total AUM Rollforward
Balance, Beginning of Period$65,456 $58,108 $45,246 
Inflows(1)
4,156 7,129 13,855 
Outflows (including realizations)(2)
(7,838)(15,493)(7,721)
Market Activity & Other(3)
4,564 18,992 3,566 
Foreign Exchange(4)
(3,047)(3,280)3,162 
Balance, End of Period$63,291 $65,456 $58,108 
(1)Inflows reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing.
151
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Investment Solutions     
Total AUM Rollforward     
Balance, Beginning of Period$43,092
 $46,205
 $50,769
New Commitments (1)5,454
 4,080
 3,527
Outflows (2)(9,804) (10,432) (11,502)
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) (3)3,645
 4,650
 7,716
Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) (4)4,407
 (963) (3,879)
Other (5)(503) (448) (426)
Balance, End of Period$46,291
 $43,092
 $46,205
(1)
New Commitments reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate, while the separately reported Fundraising metric is translated at the spot rate for each individual closing.
(2)Outflows includes distributions in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles and separately managed accounts, as well as redemptions in our fund of hedge funds vehicles.
(3)Market Appreciation/(Depreciation) generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, separately managed accounts, and fund of hedge funds vehicles. The fair market values for our Investment Solutions carry funds are based on the latest available valuations of the underlying limited partnership interests (in most cases as of September 30, 2017) as provided by their general partners, plus the net cash flows since the latest valuation, up to December 31, 2017.
(4)
Represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
(5)Includes expiring available capital, the impact of capital calls for fees and expenses and other changes in AUM.

161







(2)Outflows includes distributions in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles and separately managed accounts, as well as the expiration of available capital. Outflows during the year ended December 31, 2021 also reflect the sale of MRE on April 1, 2021, which had $2.4 billion in Total AUM as of March 31, 2021.
(3)Market Activity & Other generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles and separately managed accounts, the net impact of fees, expenses and non-investment income, as well as other changes in AUM. The fair market values for our Global Investment Solutions primary and secondary carry funds are based on the latest available valuations of the underlying limited partnership interests as provided by their general partners which typically has a lag of up to 90 days, plus the net cash flows since the latest valuation, up to December 31, 2022.
(4)Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end.
Total AUM was $46.3$63.3 billion as of December 31, 2017, an increase2022, a decrease of $3.2$2.2 billion, or 7%3%, compared to $43.1$65.5 billion as of December 31, 2016. This increase was driven by $5.52021. Driving the decrease were $7.8 billion of new commitments raisedoutflows primarily due to distributions in our AlpInvest funds $4.4and $3.0 billion of negative foreign exchange activity related to the translation of our AlpInvest AUM from EUR to USD. Offsetting the decrease was market appreciation of $4.6 billion of market appreciation, reflecting appreciation of 6% for the year, and $4.2 billion of inflows from fundraising.
Total AUM was $65.5 billion as of December 31, 2021, an increase of $7.4 billion, or 13%, compared to $58.1 billion as of December 31, 2020. Driving this increase were $7.1 billion of inflows principally from new commitments raised in our secondaries and coinvestment programs and $19.0 billion of market appreciation, reflecting appreciation of 48% for the year. Offsetting the increase were $15.5 billion of outflows primarily due to distributions in our AlpInvest funds and the sale of MRE, and $3.3 billion of negative foreign exchange activity related to the translation of our AlpInvest AUM from EUR to USD.
Total AUM was $58.1 billion as of December 31, 2020, an increase of $12.9 billion, or 29%, compared to $45.2 billion as of December 31, 2019. Driving this increase were $13.9 billion of inflows principally from new commitments raised in our AlpInvest secondaries and coinvestment programs, $3.6 billion of market and other activity, and $3.2 billion of foreign exchange gains related to the translation of our AlpInvest AUM from EUR to USD, and $3.6 billion of market appreciation. Market appreciation was driven by 10% appreciation in our AlpInvest funds and 12% appreciation in our MRE funds.USD. Offsetting thisthe increase were $9.8$7.7 billion of outflows primarily due to distributions in our AlpInvest funds.
Total AUM was $43.1 billion as of December 31, 2016, a decrease of $3.1 billion, or 7%, compared to $46.2 billion as of December 31, 2015. This decrease was driven by $10.4 billion of outflows primarily related to distributions in our AlpInvest funds and redemptions in our DGAM fund of hedge funds vehicles. Partially offsetting these decreases were $4.1 billion of new commitments primarily in our AlpInvest Primary and Secondaries product lines and $4.7 billion of market appreciation. Market appreciation was driven by 12% appreciation in our AlpInvest funds and 4% appreciation in our MRE funds.
Total AUM was $46.2 billion as of December 31, 2015, a decrease of $4.6 billion, or 9%, compared to $50.8 billion as of December 31, 2014. This decrease was driven by $11.5 billion of outflows primarily related to distributions in our AlpInvest funds and $3.9 billion of foreign exchange decreases related to the translation of our AlpInvest AUM from EUR to USD. Offsetting these decreases were $3.5 billion of new commitments primarily in our AlpInvest and Metropolitan funds and $7.7 billion of market appreciation. Market appreciation was driven by appreciation of $7.6 billion in our AlpInvest funds, $0.1 billion in our Metropolitan funds, and $0.1 billion of depreciation in our DGAM fund of hedge funds vehicles.
Fund Performance Metrics
Fund performance information for our investment funds that have at least $1.0 billion in capital commitments, cumulative equity invested or total value as of December 31, 2017,2022, which we refer to as our “significant funds,” is generally included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund return information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns. Primary and secondary investments in external funds are generally valued based on the proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. As a result, amounts presented may not include the impact of economic activity in the current quarter. See “ItemPart I. Item 1A. Risk“Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this report, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common units.stock.



162
152







The following tables reflect the performance of our significant funds in our Global Investment Solutions business.
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS
   As of December 31, 2022
Global Investment Solutions (1)(8)(13)Vintage YearFund SizeCumulative
Invested
Capital (2)(3)
Realized Value (3)Remaining Fair Value (3)Total Fair
Value (3)(4)
MOIC (5)Gross
IRR (6)(10)
Net
IRR (7)(10)
Net Accrued Carry/(Giveback) (12)
   (Reported in Local Currency, in Millions)
Secondary InvestmentsMain Fund VII2020$8,649 $4,376 $906 $4,806 $5,712 1.3x27%20%$55 
AlpInvest Secondaries Fund VII2020$6,769 $3,230 $646 $3,557 $4,203 1.3x26%19%$39 
Main Fund VI2017$6,017 $5,337 $3,255 $4,994 $8,249 1.5x17%14%$81 
AlpInvest Secondaries Fund VI2017$3,333 $2,996 $1,780 $2,833 $4,613 1.5x17%13%$52 
Main Fund V20114,273 4,495 7,303 1,051 8,354 1.9x21%20%$20 
AlpInvest Secondaries Fund V2012$756 $648 $949 $217 $1,165 1.8x18%15%$
Main Fund IV20101,859 2,039 3,448 77 3,526 1.7x19%18%$— 
Co-InvestmentsMain Fund VIII2021$3,986 $2,389 $33 $2,665 $2,698 1.1x14%10%$
AlpInvest Co-Investment Fund VIII2021$3,614 $2,144 $31 $2,406 $2,437 1.1x15%10%$
Main Fund VII2017$2,842 $2,649 $1,039 $3,681 $4,719 1.8x20%17%$73 
AlpInvest Co-Investment Fund VII2017$1,688 $1,605 $658 $2,248 $2,905 1.8x20%17%$47 
Main Fund VI20141,115 997 1,877 682 2,558 2.6x26%24%$
Main Fund V20121,124 1,090 2,680 487 3,168 2.9x28%26%$
Main Fund IV20101,475 1,411 3,582 576 4,159 2.9x24%22%$— 
Primary InvestmentsMain Fund VI20151,106 1,119 1,191 1,172 2,364 2.1x25%24%$
Main Fund V20125,080 5,939 7,697 5,106 12,802 2.2x19%19%$18 
Main Fund IV20094,877 5,790 9,679 2,711 12,389 2.1x18%17%$
Main Fund III200511,500 13,696 21,898 1,722 23,620 1.7x10%10%$— 
Main Fund II20034,545 5,075 7,988 232 8,220 1.6x10%9%$— 
All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (9)Various$12,428 $7,070 $10,719 $17,789 1.4x12%11%$101 
Fully Realized Funds & VehiclesVarious14,196 23,933 84 24,017 1.7x14%13%$— 
TOTAL GLOBAL INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS (USD) (11)$86,992 $110,060 $41,753 $151,813 1.7x14%13%$370 
     TOTAL INVESTMENTS
     as of December 31, 2017
Investment Solutions (1)
Vintage
Year
 Fund Size 
Cumulative
Invested
Capital
(2)(8)
 
Total Fair
Value (3)(8)
 MOIC (4) 
Gross
IRR  (6) (10)
 
Net IRR
(7) (10)
     (Reported in Local Currency, in Millions)
AlpInvest
            
Fully Committed Funds (5)
            
Main Fund I - Fund Investments2000 5,174.6
 4,151.9
 6,831.8
 1.6x 12% 11%
Main Fund II - Fund Investments2003 4,545.0
 4,727.2
 7,509.9
 1.6x 10% 9%
Main Fund III - Fund Investments2005 11,500.0
 12,476.5
 19,895.6
 1.6x 10% 9%
Main Fund IV - Fund Investments2009 4,877.3
 4,921.5
 7,860.7
 1.6x 16% 16%
Main Fund V - Fund Investments2012 5,080.0
 3,839.2
 4,856.9
 1.3x 13% 12%
Main Fund VI - Fund Investments2015 1,106.4
 393.1
 403.0
 1.0x NM
 NM
Main Fund I - Secondary Investments2002 519.4
 469.8
 884.0
 1.9x 57% 53%
Main Fund II - Secondary Investments2003 998.4
 983.6
 1,799.8
 1.8x 27% 26%
Main Fund III - Secondary Investments2006 2,250.0
 2,271.1
 3,448.5
 1.5x 11% 10%
Main Fund IV - Secondary Investments2010 1,859.1
 1,895.7
 3,213.3
 1.7x 20% 19%
Main Fund V - Secondary Investments2011 4,272.8
 3,739.8
 5,658.7
 1.5x 22% 20%
Main Fund II - Co-Investments2003 1,090.0
 891.1
 2,491.5
 2.8x 44% 42%
Main Fund III - Co-Investments2006 2,760.0
 2,696.9
 3,739.2
 1.4x 5% 5%
Main Fund IV - Co-Investments2010 1,475.0
 1,309.6
 3,436.7
 2.6x 24% 22%
Main Fund V - Co-Investments2012 1,122.2
 1,000.8
 2,402.5
 2.4x 34% 31%
Main Fund VI - Co-Investments2014 1,114.6
 907.0
 1,372.3
 1.5x 25% 22%
Main Fund II - Mezzanine Investments2004 700.0
 739.0
 1,018.0
 1.4x 8% 7%
Main Fund III - Mezzanine Investments2006 2,000.0
 1,905.8
 2,583.3
 1.4x 10% 9%
All Other Funds (9)Various 
 1,945.0
 2,697.6
 1.4x 14% 11%
Total Fully Committed Funds
 
 51,264.6
 82,103.3
 1.6x 13% 12%
Funds in the Commitment Period (5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Main Fund VI - Secondary Investments2017 4,263.5
 668.9
 769.0
 1.1x NM
 NM
Main Fund VII - Co-Investments2017 2,442.5
 288.7
 290.2
 1.0x NM
 NM
All Other Funds (9)Various 
 667.5
 868.9
 1.3x 21% 17%
Total Funds in the Commitment Period
 
 1,625.1
 1,928.1
 1.2x 22% 14%
TOTAL ALPINVEST
 
 52,889.7
 84,031.4
 1.6x 13% 12%
TOTAL INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS (USD) (11)   $63,577.0
 $101,011.4
 1.6x    
              
              
Metropolitan Real Estate
            
Fully Committed Funds (5)Various   $2,978.4
 $3,826.2
 1.3x 7% 4%
Funds in the Commitment Period (5)Various   $110.6
 $123.6
 1.1x NM
 NM
TOTAL METROPOLITAN REAL ESTATE
   $3,089.0
 $3,949.8
 1.3x 7% 4%
(1)    Includes private equity and mezzanine primary fund investments, secondary fund investments and co-investments originated by the AlpInvest team. Excluded from the performance information shown are a) investments that were not originated by AlpInvest, b) Direct Investments, which was spun off from AlpInvest in 2005, and c) LP co-investment vehicles advised by AlpInvest. As of December 31, 2022, these excluded investments represent $3.3 billion of AUM at AlpInvest. 
(2)    Represents the original cost of investments since inception of the fund.
(1)Includes private equity and mezzanine primary fund investments, secondary fund investments and co-investments originated by the AlpInvest team, as well as real estate primary fund investments, secondary fund investments and co-investments originated by the Metropolitan Real Estate team. Excluded from the performance information shown are a) investments that were not originated by AlpInvest, and b) Direct Investments, which was spun off from AlpInvest in 2005 and c) LP co-investment vehicles. As of December 31, 2017, these excluded investments represent $0.3 billion of AUM at AlpInvest.

(3)    To exclude the impact of FX, all foreign currency cash flows have been converted to the currency representing a majority of the capital committed to the relevant fund at the reporting period spot rate.
(4)    Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(5)    Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(6)    Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on investment contributions, distributions and unrealized value of the underlying funds, before management fees, expenses and carried interest at the AlpInvest level.
(7)    Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value after management fees, expenses and carried interest. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance revenues with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund.
163
153







(2)Represents the original cost of all capital called for investments since inception of the fund.
(3)
Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest.
(4)
Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital.
(5)
Fully Committed funds are past the expiration date of the commitment period as defined in the respective limited partnership agreement.
(6)Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on investment contributions, distributions and unrealized value of the underlying investments before management fees, expenses and carried interest at the AlpInvest/Metropolitan Real Estate level.
(7)
Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents the annualized IRR for the period indicated on Limited Partner invested capital based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value after management fees, expenses and carried interest. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance fees with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund.
(8)
To exclude the impact of FX, all AlpInvest foreign currency cash flows have been converted to Euro at the reporting period spot rate.
(9)
Aggregate includes Main Fund VII - Fund Investments, Main Fund VIII - Fund Investments, Main Fund I - Co-Investments, Main Fund I - Mezzanine Investments, Main Fund IV - Mezzanine Investments, Main Fund V - Mezzanine Investments, AlpInvest CleanTech Funds and funds which are not included as part of a main fund.
(10)
For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is negative as of reporting period end.
(11)
Represents the U.S. dollar equivalent balance translated at the spot rate as of period end.

(8)    As used herein, ‘Main Funds’ are each comprised of (i) an anchor mandate(s) (i.e., generally the largest account(s) within a strategy’s investment program) and (ii) AlpInvest’s other advisory client mandates with investment periods that fall within the relevant investment periods under the mandate of the anchor mandate(s) (but do not overlap with more than one such investment period). AlpInvest’s commingled funds, AlpInvest Secondaries Fund V (“ASF V”), ASF VI, ASF VII, AlpInvest Co-Investment Fund VII (“ACF VII”) and ACF VIII are part of the Main Funds. Mezzanine Main Funds include mezzanine investments across all strategies (i.e., Primary Funds, Secondaries, and Co-Investments).  
(9)    The performance information of all ‘Other Funds’ includes Primary Investments Main Funds VII-XIII, Mezzanine Investments Main Funds III-V, all ‘clean technology’ private equity investments, all strategic co-investment mandates that invest in co-investment opportunities arising out of an investor’s own separate private equity relationships and invitations, all strategic portfolio finance mandates, any state-focused investment mandates, and all other investors whose investments are not reflected in a Main Fund.
(10)    For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is considered meaningful but is negative as of reporting period end.
(11)    For purposes of aggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate.
(12)    Represents the net accrued performance fee balance/(giveback obligation) as of the current quarter end. Net accrued carry excludes $4 million of net accrued carry as of December 31, 2022, which was retained as part of the sale of Metropolitan Real Estate on April 1, 2021.
(13)    “Main Fund” entries represent a combination of a commingled fund and SMA vehicles which together comprise a “program” vintage. Indented lines shown for AlpInvest Secondaries Funds VII, VI, V and AlpInvest Co-Investment Funds VII and VIII reflect a breakout of the commingled fund, which is part of the larger program vintage.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Historical Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically required limited capital resources to support the working capital and operating needs of our business. Our management fees have largely covered our operating costs and all realized performance fees,allocations, after covering the related compensation, are available for distribution to equityholders. Historically, approximatelyApproximately 95% – 97% of all capital commitments to our funds have been provided by our fund investors, with the remaining amount typically funded by our senior Carlyle professionals, advisors and other professionals.
Our Sources of Liquidity
We have multiple sources of liquidity to meet our capital needs, including cash on hand, annual cash flows, accumulated earnings and funds from our senior credit facility, including a term loan facility and a revolving credit facility, with $750.0 millionwhich has $1.0 billion of available capacity as of December 31, 2017.2022. We believe these sources will be sufficient to fund our capital needs for at least the next twelve months. Ifmonths.We believe we determine that market conditions are favorable after taking into account our liquiditywill meet longer-term expected future cash requirements including theand obligations through a combination of existing cash and cash equivalent balances, cash flow from operations, accumulated earnings and amounts available underfor borrowing from our senior revolving credit facility we may seek to issue and sell common units in a registered public offering or a privately negotiated transaction, or we may issue additional senior notes, other debt or preferred equity. In September 2017, we issued 16 million of our 5.875% Series A Preferred Units for net proceeds of $387.5 million.financings.
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were approximately $1.0$1.4 billion at December 31, 2017.2022. However, a portion of this cash is allocated for specific business purposes, including, but not limited to, (i) performance allocations and incentive fee-related cash that has been received but not yet distributed as performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation and amounts owed to non-controlling interests; (ii) proceeds received from realized investments that are allocable to non-controlling interests; and (iii) regulatory capital.
Corporate Treasury Investments. Corporate treasury investments were approximately $376.3 million at December 31, 2017. Investments.These investments represent investments in U.S. Treasury and government agency obligations, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, other investment grade securities and other investments with original maturities of greater than three months when purchased.

164






As of December 31, 2022, we had $20.0 million in corporate treasury investments.
After deducting cash amounts allocated to the specific requirements mentioned above, the remaining cash, and cash equivalents includingand corporate treasury investments is approximately $1.2$1.3 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022. This remaining amount will be used towards our primary liquidity needs, as outlined in the next section. This amount does not take into consideration ordinary course of business payables and reserves for specific business purposes.

154



Senior Revolving Credit Facility. The On April 29, 2022, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its senior credit facility includes $25.0 million in a term loan and $750.0 million in a revolving credit facility. The term loan andFollowing the amendment, the capacity under the revolving credit facility is $1.0 billion and is scheduled to mature on May 5, 2020.April 29, 2027. Principal amounts outstanding under the amended term loan and restated revolving credit facility accrue interest, at the option of the borrowers, either (a) at an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin not to exceed 0.75%,0.50% per annum, or (b) at LIBORSOFR plus an applicable margin not to exceed 1.75% (2.60%1.50% per annum (5.46% at December 31, 2017)2022). As of December 31, 2022, there was no balance outstanding under the senior revolving credit facility.
The senior revolving credit facility is unsecured. We are required to maintain management fee earning assets (as defined in the amended and restated senior revolving credit facility) of at least $65.3$126.6 billion and a total leverage ratio of less than 3.04.0 to 1.0, in each case, tested on a quarterly basis. Non-compliance with any of the financial or non-financial covenants without cure or waiver would constitute an event of default under the senior revolving credit facility. An event of default resulting from a breach of certain financial or non-financial covenants may result, at the option of the lenders, in an acceleration of the principal and interest outstanding, and a termination of the senior revolving credit facility. The senior credit facility also contains other customary events of default, including defaults based on events of bankruptcy and insolvency, nonpayment of principal, interest or fees when due, breach of specified covenants, change in control and material inaccuracy of representations and warranties.
Our balance sheetGlobal Credit Revolving Credit Facility. In December 2018, certain subsidiaries of the Company established a revolving line of credit, primarily intended to support certain lending activities within the Global Credit segment. The credit facility, which was amended in December 2020 and September 2021, is scheduled to mature in September 2024, and has a capacity of $250.0 million. Principal amounts outstanding under the facility accrue interest, at the option of the borrowers, either (a) at an alternate base rate plus applicable margin not to exceed 1.00%, or (b) at the Eurocurrency rate plus an applicable margin not to exceed 2.00%. There was no borrowing outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2017 reflects $25.0 million outstanding under our senior credit facility, comprised of $25.0 million of term loan balance outstanding. On April 6, 2017, we borrowed $250 million under the revolving credit facility of our senior credit facility. This amount was repaid in full on June 2, 2017.2022.
CLO Term Loans.Borrowings. For certain of our CLOs, the PartnershipCompany finances a portion of its investment in the CLOs through the proceeds received from term loans and other financing arrangements with financial institutions.institutions or other financing arrangements. The Partnership'sCompany’s outstanding CLO term loans consist ofborrowings were $421.7 million and $222.6 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, with the following (Dollars in millions):
Formation Date Borrowing
Outstanding
December 31, 2017
  Borrowing Outstanding December 31, 2016  
Maturity Date (1)
 Interest Rate as of December 31, 2017 
October 3, 2013 $
(2) $13.2
(2) September 28, 2018 NA(3)
June 7, 2016 20.6
  20.6
  July 15, 2027 3.16%(4)
February 28, 2017 74.3
  
  September 21, 2029 2.33%(5)
April 19, 2017 22.8
  
  April 22, 2031 3.29%(6) (15)
June 28, 2017 23.1
  
  July 22, 2031 3.29%(7) (15)
July 20, 2017 24.4
  
  April 21, 2027 2.90%(8) (15)
August 2, 2017 22.8
  
  July 23, 2029 3.17%(9) (15)
August 2, 2017 20.9
  
  August 3, 2022 1.75%(10)
August 14, 2017 22.6
  
  August 15, 2030 3.26%(11) (15)
November 30, 2017 22.7
  
  January 16, 2030 3.12%(12) (15)
December 6, 2017 19.1
  
  October 16, 2030 3.01%(13) (15)
December 7, 2017 21.2
  
  January 19, 2029 2.73%(14) (15)
  $294.5
  $33.8
      

(1)     Maturity date is earlier of date indicated orincrease year-over-year primarily driven by the date that the CLO is dissolved.
(2)     Original borrowing amount of €12.6 million.
(3)     Note paid off during 2017.
(4)Incurs interest at the weighted average rate of the underlying senior notes. Interest income on the underlying collateral approximated the amount of interest expense and was not significant for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(5)Original borrowing of €61.8 million; incurs interest at EURIBOR plus applicable margins as defined in the agreement.
(6)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.932%.
(7)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.923%.
(8)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.536%.
(9)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.808%.
(10)Original borrowing of €17.4 million; incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% and has full recourse to the Partnership.

165






(11)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.848%.
(12) Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.7312%.
(13)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.647%.
(14)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.365%.
(15)Term loan issued under master credit agreement.
CBAM acquisition. The CLO term loans are secured by the Partnership’sCompany’s investments in the respective CLO, have a general unsecured interest in the Carlyle entity that manages the CLO, and generally do not have recourse to any other Carlyle entity. As of December 31, 2022, $401.0 million of these borrowings are secured by investments attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. See Note 8 of our financial statements for more information on our CLO borrowings.

European CLO Financing. On February 28, 2017, a subsidiarySenior Notes. Certain indirect finance subsidiaries of the Partnership entered into a financing agreement with several financial institutions under which these financial institutions provided a €61.8 million term loan ($74.3 million at December 31, 2017) to the Partnership. This term loan is secured by the Partnership’s investments in the retained notes in certain European CLOs that were formed in 2014 and 2015. This term loan will mature on the earlier of September 21, 2029 or the date that the certain European CLO retained notesCompany have been redeemed. The Partnership may prepay the term loan in whole or in part at any time after the third year of the date of issuance without penalty. Prepayment of the term loan within the first three years will incur a penalty based on the prepayment amount. Interest on this term loan accrues at EURIBOR plus applicable margins (2.3% at December 31, 2017).    

Master Credit Agreement - Term Loans. In January 2017, the Partnership entered into a master credit agreement with a financial institution under which the financial institution expects to provide term loans to the Partnership for the Partnership to purchase eligible interests in CLOs. This agreement will terminate in January 2020. Any term loan to be issued under this master credit agreement will be secured by the Partnership’s investment in the respective CLO as well as any senior management fee and subordinated management fee payable by each CLO. Any term loan will bear interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread and an applicable margin. Interest will be due quarterly.
3.875% Senior Notes. In January 2013, Carlyle Holdings Finance L.L.C., an indirect finance subsidiary of the Partnership issued $500.0 million of 3.875% senior notes, due February 1, 2023 at 99.966% of par. Intereston which interest is payable semi-annually, on February 1 and August 1, beginning August 1, 2013.as discussed below. The senior notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of Carlyle Holdings Finance L.L.C.the respective subsidiary and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by The Carlyle Group L.P.the Company and each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. The indentureindentures governing each of the senior notes containscontain customary covenants that, among other things, limit Carlyle Holdings Finance L.L.C.the issuers’ and the guarantors’ ability, subject to certain exceptions, to incur indebtedness secured by liens on voting stock or profit participating equity interests of their subsidiaries or merge, consolidate or sell, transfer or lease assets. The notes also contain customary events of default. All or a portion of the notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, prior to their stated maturity, at the make-whole redemption price set forth in the notes. If a change of control repurchase event occurs, the notes are subject to repurchase at the repurchase price as set forth in the notes.
3.500% Senior Notes. In September 2019, Carlyle Finance Subsidiary L.L.C. issued $425.0 million of 3.500% senior notes due September 19, 2029 at 99.841% of par.
5.650% Senior Notes. In September 2018, Carlyle Finance L.L.C. issued $350.0 million of 5.650% senior notes due September 15, 2048 at 99.914% of par.
5.625% Senior Notes.Notes. In March 2013, Carlyle Holdings II Finance L.L.C., an indirect finance subsidiary of the Partnership, issued $400.0 million of 5.625% Senior Notessenior notes due March 30, 2043 at 99.583% of par. Interest is payable semi-annually onIn March 302014, an additional $200.0 million of these notes were issued at 104.315% of par and September 30, beginning September 30, 2013.are treated as a single class with the already outstanding $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of these notes.
Subordinated Notes. In May 2021, Carlyle Finance L.L.C. issued $435.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625% subordinated notes due May 15, 2061. In June 2021, an additional $65.0 million aggregate principal amount of these subordinated notes were issued and are treated as a single series with the already outstanding $435.0 million aggregate principal
155


amount. The subordinated notes are unsecured and unsubordinatedsubordinated obligations of Carlyle Holdings Finance II L.L.C.the issuer and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a subordinated basis, by The Carlyle Group L.P. andthe Company, each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships.partnerships, and CG Subsidiary Holdings L.L.C., an indirect subsidiary of the Company. The indentureindentures governing the subordinated notes containscontain customary covenants and financial restrictions that, among other things, limit Carlyle Holdings Finance II L.L.C.the issuers’ and the guarantors’ ability, subject to certain exceptions, to incur indebtedness ranking on a parity with the subordinated notes or indebtedness ranking junior to the subordinated notes secured by liens on voting stock or profit participating equity interests of their subsidiaries or merge, consolidate or sell, transfer or lease all or substantially all of their assets. The subordinated notes also contain customary events of default. All or a portion of the notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time on or after June 15, 2026, prior to their stated maturity, at the make-wholea redemption price set forthequal to their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. If interest due on the Subordinated Notes is deemed to no longer be deductible in the notes. IfU.S., a change“Tax Redemption Event,” the subordinated notes may be redeemed, in whole, but not in part, within 120 days of control repurchasethe occurrence of such event occurs, the notes are subjectat a redemption price equal to repurchase at the repurchase price as set forth in the notes.
In March 2014, Carlyle Holdings II Finance L.L.C. issued $200.0 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due March 30, 2043 at 104.315% of par. These notes were issued as additional 5.625% Senior Notes due March 30, 2043 and will be treated as a single class with the already outstanding $400.0 million aggregatetheir principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of these senior notes.
Promissory Notes. On January 1, 2016,redemption. In addition, the Partnership issued a $120.0 million promissory note to BNRI as a result of a contingent consideration arrangement entered into in 2012 between the Partnership and BNRI as part of the Partnership's strategic investment in NGP (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements). Interest on the promissory note accrues at the three month LIBOR plus 2.50% (4.19% at December 31, 2017). The Partnershipsubordinated notes may prepay the promissory notebe redeemed, in whole, orbut not in part, at any time without penalty. The promissory note is scheduledprior to mature on January 1, 2022. In December 2016, the Partnership repurchased $11.2 millionMay 15, 2026, within 90 days of the promissory note.

166






Additionally, in June 2017, as part ofrating agencies determining that the settlement with investors in two commodities investment vehicles managed by an affiliate of the Partnership (discussed in Note 9Subordinated Notes should no longer receive partial equity treatment pursuant to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements),rating agency’s criteria, a “rating agency event,” at a redemption price equal to 102% of their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the Partnership issued a seriesdate of promissory notes, aggregating to $53.9 million, to the investors of these commodities investment vehicles. Interest on these promissory notes accrues at the three month LIBOR plus 2% (3.36% at December 31, 2017). The Partnership may prepay these promissory notes in whole or in part at any time without penalty. In October 2017, the Partnership repaid $6.7 million of this promissory note. Accordingly, $47.2 million of this promissory note is outstanding at December 31, 2017. These promissory notes are scheduled to mature on July 15, 2019.redemption.
Obligations of CLOs. Loans payable of the Consolidated Funds represent amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by the CLOs. We are not liable for any loans payable of the CLOs. Several of the CLOs issued preferred shares representing the most subordinated interest, however these tranches are mandatorily redeemable upon the maturity dates of the senior secured loans payable, and as a result have been classified as liabilities under U.S. GAAP, and are included in loans payable of Consolidated Funds in our consolidated balance sheets.
Loans payable of the CLOs are collateralized by the assets held by the CLOs and the assets of one CLO may not be used to satisfy the liabilities of another. This collateral consists of cash and cash equivalents, corporate loans, corporate bonds and other securities.
Preferred Units. On September 13, 2017, we issued 16 million of our Preferred Units for net proceeds of approximately $387.5 million. We plan to use these proceeds for general corporate purposes, including to fund investments. Distributions on the Preferred Units are discretionary and non-cumulative. The Preferred Units may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after September 15, 2022 at a price of $25 per Preferred Unit, plus declared and unpaid distributions. In addition, the Preferred Units may be redeemed at our option prior to September 15, 2022, upon the occurrence of change of control, tax redemption or rating agency events. Holders of the Preferred Units will generally have no voting rights and have none of the voting rights given to holders of our common units, except as otherwise provided in Carlyle's limited partnership agreement. Holders of the Preferred Units have no right to require the redemption of the Preferred Units and the Preferred Units do not have a maturity date. See Note 14 of our consolidated financial statements for more information.
Realized performance fee revenuePerformance Allocation Revenues. Another source of liquidity we may use to meet our capital needs is the realized performance fee revenueallocation revenues generated by our investment funds. Carried interest isPerformance allocations are generally realized when an underlying investment is profitably disposed of and the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return. For certain funds, carried interest isperformance allocations are realized once all invested capital and expenses have been returned to the fund'sfund’s investors and the fund'sfund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return. Incentive fees earned on our CLO vehicles generally are paid upon the dissolution of such vehicles.


156


Our accrued performance feesallocations by segment as of December 31, 2017,2022, gross and net of accrued giveback obligations, are set forth below:
Asset ClassAccrued
Performance
Allocations
Accrued
Giveback
Obligation
Net Accrued
Performance
Revenues
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$5,577.1 $(18.4)$5,558.7 
Global Credit193.9 (22.5)171.4 
Global Investment Solutions(1)
1,346.7 — 1,346.7 
Total$7,117.7 $(40.9)$7,076.8 
Plus: Accrued performance allocations from NGP Carry Funds564.6 
Less: Net accrued performance allocations presented as fee related performance revenues(53.2)
Less: Accrued performance allocation-related compensation(3,625.3)
Plus: Receivable for giveback obligations from current and former employees10.1 
Less: Deferred taxes on certain foreign accrued performance allocations(31.6)
Less/Plus: Net accrued performance allocations/giveback obligations attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities1.1 
Plus: Net accrued performance allocations attributable to Consolidated Funds, eliminated in consolidation5.4 
Net accrued performance revenues before timing differences3,947.9 
Less/Plus: Timing differences between the period when accrued performance revenues are realized and the period they are collected/distributed16.7 
Net accrued performance revenues attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.$3,964.6 
Asset Class
Accrued
Performance
Fees
 
Accrued
Giveback
Obligation
 
Net Accrued
Performance
Fees
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$2,272.4
 $(8.7) $2,263.7
Real Assets657.5
 (58.1) 599.4
Global Credit56.1
 
 56.1
Investment Solutions684.6
 
 684.6
Total$3,670.6
 $(66.8) $3,603.8
Plus: Accrued performance fees from NGP    143.2
Less: Accrued performance fee-related compensation (1,894.8)
Plus: Receivable for giveback obligations from current and former employees 5.0
Less: Deferred taxes on accrued performance fees (67.6)
Less: Net accrued performance fees attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities (0.8)
Net accrued performance fees before timing differences 1,788.8
Less/Plus: Timing differences between the period when accrued performance fees are realized and the period they are collected/distributed (71.6)
Net accrued performance fees attributable to Carlyle Holdings $1,717.2
(1) The Company’s primary and secondary investments in external funds are generally valued based on its proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. As a result, amounts presented may not include the impact of economic activity in the current quarter.

167






As of December 31, 2017, theThe net accrued performance feesrevenues attributable to The Carlyle Holdings,Group Inc., excluding realized amounts, related to our carry funds and our other vehicles as of December 31, 2022, as well as the carry fund appreciation (depreciation), is set forth below by segment were as follows (Dollars in millions):
Carry fund-related 
Corporate Private Equity: 
     Buyout$1,097.9
     Growth Capital41.7
Total Corporate Private Equity1,139.6
Real Assets: 
     Real Estate312.7
     Natural Resources180.3
     Legacy Energy(16.2)
     Total Real Assets476.8
Global Credit27.2
Investment Solutions73.6
Net accrued performance fees attributable to Carlyle Holdings$1,717.2
Carry Fund Appreciation/(Depreciation)(1)
Net Accrued
Performance Revenues
FY 2020FY 2021FY 2022
Overall Carry Fund Appreciation/(Depreciation)10%41%11%
Global Private Equity$3,488.7 
 Corporate Private Equity19%41%6%2,313.8 
Real Estate8%39%16%275.5 
Infrastructure & Natural Resources(16)%34%48%899.4 
Global Credit Carry Funds(2)%22%3%102.4 
Global Investment Solutions Carry Funds(2)
10%48%6%373.5 
Net Accrued Performance Revenues$3,964.6 
(1) Appreciation/(Depreciation) represents unrealized gain/(loss) for the period on a total return basis before fees and expenses. The percentage of return is calculated as: ending remaining investment fair market value plus net investment outflow (sales proceeds minus net purchases) minus beginning remaining investment fair market value divided by beginning remaining investment fair market value. Amounts are fund only, and do not include coinvestments.
(2) The Company’s primary and secondary investments in external funds are generally valued based on its proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. As a result, amounts presented may not include the impact of economic activity in the current quarter. Appreciation in 2022 includes the positive impact of foreign currency translation of the USD-denominated investments in our EUR-based funds. Excluding that impact, appreciation was 4% for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Realized investment income.Principal Investment Income. Another source of liquidity we may use to meet our capital needs is the realized principal investment income generated by our equity method investments and other principal investments. InvestmentPrincipal investment income is realized when we redeem all or a portion of our investment or when we receive or are due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. Certain of the investments attributable to The Carlyle HoldingsGroup Inc. (excluding certain general partner interests, strategic investments, and investments in certain CLOs) may be sold at our discretion as a source of liquidity. During
157


the year ended December 31, 2021, we sold approximately $150.4 million of investments in U.S. CLOs and used the proceeds to repay outstanding CLO borrowings (see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements).
Investments as of December 31, 2022 consist of the following:
Investments in Carlyle Funds
Investments in NGP(1)
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Investments, excluding performance allocations$2,710.6 $934.2 $3,644.8 
Less: Amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(167.8)— (167.8)
Plus: Investments in Consolidated Funds, eliminated in consolidation222.0 — 222.0 
Less: Strategic equity method investments in NGP Management— (369.7)(369.7)
Less: Investment in NGP general partners - accrued performance allocations— (564.5)(564.5)
Total investments attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.$2,764.8 $— $2,764.8 
(1) See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
Our investments as of December 31, 2022 can be further attributed as follows (Dollars in millions):
Investments in Carlyle Funds, excluding CLOs:
Global Private Equity funds(1)
$845.9 
Global Credit funds(2)
1,046.5 
Global Investment Solutions funds(3)
199.6 
Total investments in Carlyle Funds, excluding CLOs2,092.0 
Investments in CLOs531.2 
Other investments141.6 
Total investments attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.2,764.8 
CLO loans and other borrowings collateralized by investments attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.(4)
(401.0)
Total investments attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc., net of CLO loans and other borrowings$2,363.8 
(1) Excludes our strategic equity method investment in NGP Management and investments in NGP general partners - accrued performance allocations.
(2) Includes the Company’s investment in Fortitude Re, which was contributed to Carlyle FRL, a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund, in June 2020 as discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. This investment has a carrying value of $715.7 million as of December 31, 2022.
(3) The Company’s primary and secondary investments in external funds are generally valued based on its proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. As a result, amounts presented may not include the impact of economic activity in the current quarter.
(4) Of the $421.7 million in total CLO borrowings as of December 31, 2022 and as disclosed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, $401.0 million are collateralized by investments attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. The remaining $20.7 million in total CLO borrowings are collateralized by investments attributable to non-controlling interests.
Our Liquidity Needs
We generally use our working capital and cash flows to invest in growth initiatives, service our debt, fund the working capital needs of our business and investment funds and pay distributionsdividends to our unitholders.common stockholders.
In the future, we expect that our primary liquidity needs will be to:
provide capital to facilitate the growth of our existing business lines;

provide capital to facilitate our expansion into new, complementary business lines, including acquisitions;

pay operating expenses, including compensation and compliance costs and other obligations as they arise;

fund costs of litigation and contingencies, including related legal costs;

fund the capital investments of Carlyle in our funds;

fund capital expenditures;

repay borrowings and related interest costs and expenses;

pay earnouts and contingent cash consideration associated with our acquisitions and strategic investments;

158


pay income taxes, including corporate income taxes;

make distributionspay dividends to our common and preferred unitholders andstockholders in accordance with our dividend policy;
make installment payments under the deferred obligation to former holders of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units, which were exchanged in accordance with our distribution policy, and;the Conversion; and

repurchase our units.common stock.
Preferred Unit Distributions. With respect to distribution year 2017, the Board of Directors of our general partner has declared a distribution to preferred unitholders totaling approximately $6.0 million, or $0.375347 per Preferred Unit, which was paid on December 15, 2017. In February 2018, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership declared a distribution for the first quarter of 2018 of $0.367188 per preferred unit to preferred unitholders of record at the close of

168






business on March 1, 2018, payable on March 15, 2018. Distributions on the Preferred Units are discretionary and non-cumulative.
Common Unit Distributions. With respect to distribution year 2017, the Board of Directors of our general partner has declared cumulative distributions to common unitholders totaling approximately $137.5 million, or $1.41 per common unit, consisting of (i) $0.33 per common unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2017, which is payable on February 27, 2018 to common unitholders of record on February 20, 2018, (ii) $0.56 per common unit in respect of the third quarter of 2017, which was paid in November 2017, (iii) $0.42 per common unit in respect of the second quarter of 2017, which was paid in August 2017, and (iv) $0.10 per common unit in respect of the first quarter of 2017, which was paid in May 2017. Distributions to common unitholders paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2017 were $118.1 million, representing the distributions paid in February 2017 of $0.16 per common unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2016, $0.10 per common unit with respect to the first quarter of 2017, $0.42 per common unit with respect to the second quarter of 2017, and $0.56 per common unit with respect to the third quarter of 2017.
With respect to distribution year 2016, the Board of Directors of our general partner has declared cumulative distributions to common unitholders totaling approximately $131.1 million, or $1.55 per common unit, consisting of (i) $0.16 per common unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2016, which was paid in February 2017, (ii) $0.50 per common unit in respect of the third quarter of 2016, which was paid in November 2016, (iii) $0.63 per common unit in respect of the second quarter of 2016, which was paid in August 2016, and (iv) $0.26 per common unit in respect of the first quarter of 2016, which was paid in May 2016. Distributions to common unitholders paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2016 were $140.9 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2016 of $0.29 per common unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2015, $0.26 per common unit with respect to the first quarter of 2016, $0.63 per common unit with respect to the second quarter of 2016, and $0.50 per common unit with respect to the third quarter of 2016.
With respect to distribution year 2015, the Board of Directors of our general partner has declared cumulative distributions to common unitholders totaling approximately $163.7 million, or $2.07 per common unit, consisting of (i) $0.29 per common unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2015, which was paid in March 2016, (ii) $0.56 per common unit in respect of the third quarter of 2015, which was paid in November 2015, (iii) $0.89 per common unit in respect of the second quarter of 2015, which was paid in August 2015, and (iv) $0.33 per common unit in respect of the first quarter of 2015, which was paid in May 2015. Distributions to common unitholders paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 were $251.0 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2015 of $1.61 per common unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2014, $0.33 per common unit with respect to the first quarter of 2015, $0.89 per common unit with respect to the second quarter of 2015, and $0.56 per common unit with respect to the third quarter of 2015.
Carlyle Holdings Units Distributions. With respect to distribution year 2017, we declared distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings totaling approximately $334.2 million, or $1.41 per Carlyle Holdings unit, consisting of (i) $0.33 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2017, which is payable on February 26, 2018 to Carlyle Holdings unitholders of record on February 20, 2018, (ii) $0.56 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the third quarter of 2017, which was paid in November 2017, (iii) $0.42 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the second quarter of 2017, which was paid in August 2017, and (iv) $0.10 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the first quarter of 2017, which was paid in May 2017.  Distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2017 were $295.6 million, representing the distributions paid in February 2017 of $0.16 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2016, $0.10 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the first quarter of 2017, $0.42 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the second quarter of 2017, and $0.56 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the third quarter of 2017.
With respect to distribution year 2016, we declared distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings totaling approximately $376.2 million, or $1.55 per Carlyle Holdings unit, consisting of (i) $0.16 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the fourth quarter of 2016, which was paid in February 2017, (ii) $0.50 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the third quarter of 2016, which was paid in November 2016, (iii) $0.63 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the second quarter of 2016, which was paid in August 2016, and (iv) $0.26 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the first quarter of 2016, which was paid in May 2016.  Distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2016 were $422.6 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2016 of $0.35 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2015, $0.26 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the first quarter of 2016, $0.63 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the second quarter of 2016, and $0.50 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the third quarter of 2016.
With respect to distribution year 2015, we declared distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings totaling approximately $530.1 million, or $2.17 per Carlyle Holdings unit, consisting of (i) $0.35 per Carlyle Holdings unit in

169






respect of the fourth quarter of 2015, which was paid in March 2016, (ii) $0.60 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the third quarter of 2015, which was paid in November 2015, (iii) $0.89 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the second quarter of 2015, which was paid in August 2015, and (iv) $0.33 per Carlyle Holdings unit in respect of the first quarter of 2015, which was paid in May 2015.  Distributions to the other limited partners of Carlyle Holdings paid during the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 were $848.5 million, representing the distributions paid in March 2015 of $1.61 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the fourth quarter of 2014, $0.33 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the first quarter of 2015, $0.89 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the second quarter of 2015, and $0.60 per Carlyle Holdings unit with respect to the third quarter of 2015.
It is Carlyle’s intention to cause Carlyle Holdings to make quarterly distributions to its partners, includingStockholder Dividends. The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries, that will enable The Carlyle Group L.P. to pay a quarterly distribution of approximately 75% of Distributable Earnings Attributable to Common Unitholders for the quarter. “Distributable Earnings Attributable to Common Unitholders” refers to The Carlyle Group L.P.'s share of Distributable Earnings, after an implied provision for current corporate income taxes (other than corporate income taxes attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.) and preferred unit distributions, net of corporate income taxes attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. and amounts payable under the tax receivable agreement. Carlyle’s general partner may adjust the distribution for amounts determined to be necessary or appropriate to provide for the conduct of its business, to make appropriate investments in its business and its funds or to comply with applicable law or any of its financing agreements, or to provide for future cash requirements such as tax-related payments, giveback obligations and distributions to unitholders for any ensuing quarter. The amount to be distributed could also be adjusted upward in any one quarter.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the declaration and payment of any distributionsdividends to holders of our common stock is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and compliance with applicable law. Under our dividend policy for our common stock, we have paid dividends to holders of our common stock in an amount of $0.325 per share of common stock ($1.30 per share annually) during dividend year 2022. In February 2023, our Board of Directors approved an increase in the anticipated common stock dividend to an annual rate of $1.40 per share ($0.35 per common share on a quarterly basis), anticipated to commence for the first quarter 2023 dividend anticipated to be paid in May 2023. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, any dividends we pay following the Conversion generally will be treated as qualified dividend income (generally taxable to U.S. individual stockholders at capital gain rates) paid by a domestic corporation to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, with any excess dividends treated as return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s basis. The declaration and payment of dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the sole discretion of our general partner, whichBoard of Directors, and our dividend policy may change our distribution policybe changed at any time. Our general partner will take into account general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans and prospects, our business and investment opportunities, our financial condition and operating results, working capital requirements and anticipated cash needs, contractual restrictions and obligations, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, other constraints on
    With respect to distribution year 2022, the paymentBoard of distributions by usDirectors declared dividends to our common unitholdersstockholders totaling approximately $472.5 million, or by our subsidiaries to us, and such other factors as our general partner may deem relevant.
Because our wholly owned subsidiaries must pay taxes and make payments under the tax receivable agreement, the amounts ultimately distributed by us to our$1.30 per common unitholders are expected to be less, on a per unit basis, than the amounts distributed by the Carlyle Holdings partnerships to the other limited partnersshare, consisting of the Carlyle Holdings partnershipsfollowing:
Common Stock Dividends - Dividend Year 2022
QuarterDividend per Common ShareDividend to Common StockholdersRecord DatePayment Date
Q1 2022$0.325 $117.6 May 10, 2022May 17, 2022
Q2 20220.325 118.3 August 9, 2022August 16, 2022
Q3 20220.325 118.2 November 18, 2022November 25, 2022
Q4 20220.325 118.4 February 22, 2023March 1, 2023
Total$1.30 $472.5 
    With respect to distribution year 2021, the Board of Directors declared dividends to common stockholders totaling approximately $356.6 million, or $1.00 per common share, to common stockholders, consisting of the following:
Common Stock Dividends - Dividend Year 2021
QuarterDividend per Common ShareDividend to Common StockholdersRecord DatePayment Date
Q1 2021$0.25 $88.7 May 11, 2021May 19, 2021
Q2 20210.25 89.3 August 10, 2021August 17, 2021
Q3 20210.25 89.1 November 9, 2021November 17, 2021
Q4 20210.25 89.5 February 15, 2022February 23, 2022
Total$1.00 $356.6 
159



With respect to distribution year 2020, the Board of Directors declared dividends to common stockholders totaling approximately $352.6 million, or $1.00 per common share, to common stockholders, consisting of the following:    
Common Stock Dividends - Dividend Year 2020
QuarterDividend per Common ShareDividend to Common StockholdersRecord DatePayment Date
Q1 2020$0.25 $87.2 May 12, 2020May 19, 2020
Q2 20200.25 88.3 August 11, 2020August 18, 2020
Q3 20200.25 88.4 November 10, 2020November 17, 2020
Q4 20200.25 88.7 February 16, 2021February 23, 2021
Total$1.00 $352.6 
Dividends to common stockholders paid during the year ended December 31, 2022 totaled $443.6 million, including the amount paid in February 2022 of $0.25 per common share in respect of their Carlyle Holdings partnership units.the fourth quarter of 2021. Dividends to common stockholders paid during the year ended December 31, 2021 totaled $355.8 million, including the amount paid in February 2021 of $0.25 per common share in respect of the fourth quarter of 2020. Dividends to common stockholders paid during the year ended December 31, 2020 totaled $351.3 million, including the amount paid in February 2020 of $0.25 per common share in respect of the fourth quarter of 2019.
Fund commitments.Commitments. Generally, we intend to have Carlyle commit to fund approximately 0.75% to 1% of the capital commitments to our future carry funds, although we may elect to invest additional amounts in funds focused on new investment areas. We may, from time to time, exercise our right to purchase additional interests in our investment funds that become available in the ordinary course of their operations. We expect our senior Carlyle professionals and employees to continue to make significant capital contributions to our funds based on their existing commitments, and to make capital commitments to future funds consistent with the level of their historical commitments. We also intend to make investments in our open-end funds and our CLO vehicles. Our investments in our U.S. and European CLO vehicles will comply with the risk retention rules as discussed in “U.S. Risk“Risk Retention Rules” later in this section.


Since our inception through December 31, 2017,2022, we and our senior Carlyle professionals, operating executives and other professionals have invested or committed to invest in or alongside our funds. Approximately 3% to 5% of all capital commitments to our funds are funded collectively by us and our senior Carlyle professionals, operating executives and other professionals. The current unfunded commitment of Carlyle and our senior Carlyle professionals, operating executives and other professionals to our investment funds as of December 31, 2017,2022, consisted of the following:
Asset Class
Unfunded
Commitment
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$2,354.2
Real Assets812.0
Global Credit526.0
Investment Solutions146.5
Total$3,838.7

170






Asset ClassUnfunded
Commitment
(Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$3,300.0 
Global Credit389.0 
Global Investment Solutions260.9 
Total$3,949.9 
A substantial majority of the remaining commitments are expected to be funded by senior Carlyle professionals, operating executives and other professionals through our internal co-investment program. Of the $3.8$3.9 billion of unfunded commitments, approximately $3.4$3.2 billion is subscribed individually by senior Carlyle professionals, operating executives and other professionals, with the balance funded directly by the Partnership.Company.
InvestmentsUnder the Carlyle Global Capital Markets platform, certain of our subsidiaries may act as an underwriter, syndicator or placement agent for security offerings and loan originations. We earn fees in connection with these activities and bear the risk of the sale of such securities and placement of such loans, which may be longer dated. As of December 31, 2017 consist2022, we had €20.0 million ($21.4 million) in commitments related to the origination and syndication of loans and securities under the following (DollarsCarlyle Global Capital Markets platform, which were extinguished in millions):January 2023.
160


  
Investments$1,624.3
Less: Amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(363.7)
Less: Strategic equity method investments in NGP Management(397.7)
Less: Investment in NGP accrued performance fees(143.2)
Investments excluding non-controlling interests and NGP719.7
Plus: investments in Consolidated Funds, eliminated in consolidation219.9
Total investments attributable to Carlyle Holdings, exclusive of NGP management$939.6
Of the $939.6 million of total investments attributable to Carlyle Holdings, approximately $275 million are financed with loans (see Sources of Liquidity earlier in this section). The financing of our CLO investments within the last year has caused our total investments to increase at a faster rate than in prior periods. We expect this trend to continue in the near term.
Repurchase Program.In February 2016, theOctober 2021, our Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership authorized the repurchase of up to $200$400 million of common units and/or Carlyle Holdings units. Under this unitstock effective January 1, 2022, which replaced a repurchase authorization provided in February 2021. This program units may be repurchasedauthorizes the repurchase of shares of common stock from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. We expect that the majority of repurchases under this program will be done via open market transactions. No units will be repurchased from our executive officers under this program. The timing and actual number of common units and/or Carlyle Holdings units repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements, price, and economic and market conditions. This unit repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, we have paid an aggregate of $0.2$185.7 million to repurchase and retire 14,190 unitsapproximately 4.9 million shares of common stock with all of the repurchases done via open market and brokered transactions. Since inceptionAs of December 31, 2022, $214.3 million of repurchase capacity remained under the program. In February 2023, the Board of Directors replenished the repurchase program we have paid anand expanded the limit to $500 million of common stock in aggregate, of $59.1 million to repurchase and retire 3,695,889 units.effective March 31, 2023.
Cash Flows
The significant captions and amounts from our consolidated statements of cash flows which include the effects of our Consolidated Funds and CLOs in accordance with U.S. GAAP are summarized below.
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Statements of Cash Flows Data
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, including investments in Carlyle funds$(379.3)$1,791.0 $(169.2)
Net cash used in investing activities(828.8)(32.2)(61.2)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities114.8 (242.5)370.3 
Effect of foreign exchange rate change(20.3)(30.8)21.7 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$(1,113.6)$1,485.5 $161.6 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Statements of Cash Flows Data     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(7.1) $(300.6) $3,902.8
Net cash used in investing activities(49.5) (20.1) (21.5)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities318.6
 15.3
 (4,011.2)
Effect of foreign exchange rate change67.2
 (15.2) (120.6)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$329.2
 $(320.6) $(250.5)
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash (used in) Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities includes the investment activity of our Consolidated Funds. Excluding this activity, net cash (used in) provided by operating activities was primarily driven by our earnings in the respective periods after adjusting for significant non-cash activity, including non-cash performance allocations and incentive fees, the related non-cash performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation, non-cash equity-based compensation, and depreciation, amortization and impairments, all of which are included in earnings.
Cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, excluding the activities of our Consolidated Funds, were $860.7 million, $2,143.0 million and $716.8 million, respectively. Operating cash inflows primarily include the receipt of management fees and realized performance allocations and incentive fees, while operating cash outflows primarily include payments for operating expenses, including compensation, income taxes, interest, and general, administrative and other expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, net cash provided by operating activities primarily includes the receipt of management fees and realized performance allocations and incentive fees, totaling approximately $2.2$4.1 billion, $2.2$4.7 billion, and $2.7$2.1 billion, respectively. These inflows were partially offset by payments for compensation, income taxes, interest, and

171






general, administrative and other expenses of approximately $1.6approximately $3.1 billion, $1.8$3.1 billion, and $1.9$1.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.
Cash used to purchase investments as well as the proceeds from the sale of such investments are also reflected in our operating activities as investments are a normal part of our operating activities. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, investment proceeds were $467.5$474.9 million while investment purchases were $888.5$629.9 million, which includes our $200 million strategic investment in iStar through our real estate credit fund and our $49 million follow-on investment in Carlyle FRL. During the year ended December 31, 2021, investment proceeds were $668.4 million while investment purchases were $276.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, investment proceeds were $299.5$307.5 million while investment purchases were $368.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015,$350.9 million, including $79.6 million related to a purchase price adjustment on our strategic investment proceeds were $313.0 million while investment purchases were $91.9 million.in Fortitude.
The net cash used inprovided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20172022 also reflects the investment activity of our Consolidated Funds. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, proceeds from the sales and settlements of investments by the Consolidated Funds were $2,649.3 million,$2.9 billion, while purchases of investments by the Consolidated Funds were $2,875.0 million.$3.8 billion. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2021, proceeds from the sales and settlements of investments by the Consolidated Funds were $1,282.9 million,$4.9 billion, while purchases of investments by the Consolidated Funds were $2,739.4 million.$5.4 billion. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, proceeds from the sales and settlements of investments by the Consolidated Funds were $11,653.6 million,$2.0 billion, while purchases of investments by the Consolidated Funds were $10,472.1 million.$3.1 billion.
161


Net Cash Used In Investing Activities. Our investing activities generally reflect cash used for acquisitions, fixed assets and software for internal use, corporate treasury investments and changes in restricted cash. Duringcash received from dispositions. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, cash used in investing activities principally reflects purchases of intangible assets and net CLO investments from the CBAM transaction of $618.4 million, the purchase of Abingworth of $150.2 million, and net purchases of corporate treasury investments of $69.6 million, as well as net purchases of fixed assets. Purchasesassets of $40.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, net purchases of fixed assets of $41.4 million were partially offset by proceeds received from the sales of MRE and our Brazil management entity of $5.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2020, purchases of fixed assets were $34.0 million, $25.4$61.2 million.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, excluding the activities of our Consolidated Funds, was $(1.1) billion, $(602.1) million and $62.3$(511.0) million, respectively. Dividends paid to our common stockholders were $443.6 million, $355.8 million, and $351.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.
In 2022, we also paid $68.8 million in January 2022 for the third installment of the deferred consideration payable to former Carlyle Holdings unitholders in connection with the Conversion, and paid $185.6 million to repurchase and retire 4.9 million shares of common stock. Net Cash Usedcash used in Financing Activities. Financingfinancing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 (prior to the effects of consolidation) also includes $456.2 million primarily related to amounts funded to bridge investment activity in consolidated funds that are a net sourceactively fundraising in our Global Private Equity segment. This investment activity is reflected as purchases of investment in our consolidated statement of cash in 2017 and 2016 and a net use of cash in 2015.flows. In 2017,2021, we received net proceeds of $387.5$484.1 million from the issuance of preferred units. In 2016, we$500.0 million of 4.625% subordinated notes, and made $120.8 million of net repayments on borrowings used to finance a portion of our investments in the CLOs. We borrowed and repaid $70.0 million in borrowings under the Global Credit revolving credit facility, and paid $58.9$259.9 million to redeem the 3.875% Senior Notes. We also paid $68.8 million in January 2021 for the second installment of the deferred consideration payable to former Carlyle Holdings unitholders in connection with the Conversion, and paid $161.8 million to repurchase 3.7and retire 3.2 million units under our unit repurchase program.shares of common stock. In June 2015, the Partnership2020, we received net proceeds of $294.1 million from borrowings under the issuancerevolving credit facilities, and repaid $329.9 million, and paid $68.8 million in January 2020 for the first installment of 7,000,000 common units of $209.9 million. The Partnership used these net proceedsthe deferred consideration payable to acquire 7,000,000former Carlyle Holdings partnership units fromunitholders in connection with the other limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships.Conversion.
Distributions to our common unitholders were $118.1 million, $140.9 million, and $251.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Distributions to the non-controlling interest holders in Carlyle Holdings were $295.6 million, $422.6 million, and $848.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net (payments) borrowings on loans payable by our Consolidated Funds during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 were $147.2$624.2 million, $594.2$182.9 million, and $734.3$704.1 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, contributions from non-controlling interest holders were $119.2$391.2 million, $113.0$216.2 million, and $2,376.6$210.0 million, respectively, which relate primarily to contributions from the non-controlling interest holders in Consolidated Funds. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, distributions to non-controlling interest holders were $118.0$216.8 million, $109.4$94.6 million, and $5,267.0$77.8 million, respectively, which relate primarily to distributions to the non-controlling interest holdersnon-Carlyle interests in Consolidated Funds.majority-owned in majority-owned subsidiaries.    


Our Balance Sheet
    
Total assets were $12.3$21.4 billion at December 31, 2017,2022, an increase of $2.3$0.2 billion from December 31, 2016.2021. The increase in total assets was primarily attributable to increasesan increase in accrued performance fees,net intangible assets of $0.9 billion driven by the Abingworth and CBAM transactions, an increase in investments of Consolidated Funds of $0.2 billion, and an increase in consolidated funds, investments,amounts due from affiliates and cash and cash equivalentsother receivables of $1,189.5 million, $640.6 million, $517.3 million, and $329.2 million, respectively.$0.2 billion. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds of $383.9 million$1.1 billion driven by the iStar, CBAM and Abingworth strategic transactions, as well as the deconsolidation in 2017payment of the total assetsthird installment of deferred consideration to the real estate VIE of $176.9 million.former Carlyle Holdings unitholders, and payments for bonuses and payroll, dividends and income taxes. Cash and cash equivalents including corporate treasury investments, were approximately $1.4 billion and $2.5 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
Total liabilities were $14.6 billion at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $0.5$1.0 billion from December 31, 2016.
Total liabilities were $9.3 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $0.8 billion from December 31, 2016.2021. The increasedecrease in liabilities was primarily attributable to increasesa decrease in accrued compensation and benefits loans payable of consolidated funds, and debt obligations of $560.8 million, $437.5 million, and $308.4 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by decreases$0.6 billion due to the corresponding decrease in accrued performance allocations, as well as a decrease in other liabilities of Consolidated Funds of $0.4 billion. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in debt obligations of $0.2 billion, driven by an increase in outstanding CLO borrowings, largely in connection with the CBAM transaction (see Notes 4 and 8 to the deconsolidation in 2017 of the liabilities of the real estate VIE of $214.9 million and $203.9 million, respectively.consolidated financial statements).
The assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are generally held within separate legal entities and, as a result, the assets of the Consolidated Funds are not available to meet our liquidity requirements and similarly the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are non-recourse to us. For example, as previously discussed, the CLO term loans generally are secured by

172






the Partnership'sCompany’s investment in the CLO, have a general unsecured interest in the Carlyle entity that manages the CLO, and do not have recourse to any other Carlyle entity.
162


Our balance sheet without the effect of the Consolidated Funds can be seen in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. At December 31, 2017,2022, our total assets without the effect of the Consolidated Funds were $7.5$14.8 billion, including cash and cash equivalents and corporate treasury investments totaling $1.4 billion and net accrued performance feesrevenues of $1.7 billion.$4.0 billion (inclusive of net accrued performance allocations from NGP).
Unconsolidated Entities
Our corporate private equity funds and certainCertain of our real estate funds have entered into lines of credit secured by their investors’ unpaid capital commitments or by a pledge of the equity of the underlying investment. These lines of credit are used primarily to reduce the overall number of capital calls to investors or for working capital needs. In certain instances, however, they may be used for other investment related activities, including serving as bridge financing for investments. The degree of leverage employed varies among our funds.
In March 2022, Carlyle Net Leasing Income, L.P., a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund, acquired a diversified portfolio companies.of triple net leases from iStar, Inc. for an enterprise value of $3 billion, which was funded using $2 billion in debt and $1 billion in equity. The investment fund is not consolidated by us, and the debt is non-recourse to us. As general partner of the investment fund, we contributed $200 million as a minority interest balance sheet investment, which is included in our Global Credit principal equity method investments (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements including sponsoring and owning limited or general partner interests in consolidated and non-consolidated funds, entering into derivative transactions, entering into operating leases and entering into guarantee arrangements. We also have ongoing capital commitment arrangements with certain of our consolidated and non-consolidated funds. We do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that would require us to fund losses or guarantee target returns to investors in any of our other investment funds.
For further information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 23 and Note 910 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth information relating to our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172022 on a consolidated basis and on a basis excluding the obligations of the Consolidated Funds:
20232024-20252026-2027ThereafterTotal
 (Dollars in millions)
Debt obligations(1)
$— $— $16.3 $2,280.4 $2,296.7 
Interest payable(2)
183.0 227.5 220.7 1,795.7 2,426.9 
Other consideration(3)
147.8 250.3 36.0 18.0 452.1 
Operating lease obligations(4)
68.1 125.0 117.3 339.2 649.6 
Capital commitments to Carlyle funds(5)
3,971.3 — — — 3,971.3 
Tax receivable agreement payments(6)
20.4 6.5 6.5 66.6 100.0 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(7)
215.1 430.8 430.2 6,690.0 7,766.1 
Unfunded commitments of the CLOs(8)
6.8 — — — 6.8 
Consolidated contractual obligations4,612.5 1,040.1 827.0 11,189.9 17,669.5 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(7)
(215.1)(430.8)(430.2)(6,690.0)(7,766.1)
Capital commitments to Carlyle funds(5)
(3,244.2)— — — (3,244.2)
Unfunded commitments of the CLOs(8)
(6.8)— — — (6.8)
Carlyle Operating Entities contractual obligations$1,146.4 $609.3 $396.8 $4,499.9 $6,652.4 
 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 Thereafter Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Debt obligations (including senior notes)(a)
$20.2
 $52.0
 $114.6
 $1,388.7
 $1,575.5
Interest payable(b)
69.1
 135.4
 125.9
 727.5
 1,057.9
Contingent cash and other consideration(c)
83.3
 13.6
 
 
 96.9
Operating lease obligations(d)
47.9
 97.3
 85.1
 295.7
 526.0
Capital commitments to Carlyle funds(e)
3,838.7
 
 
 
 3,838.7
Tax receivable agreement payments(f)
1.3
 
 13.1
 79.6
 94.0
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(g)
89.2
 178.6
 178.4
 4,867.1
 5,313.3
Unfunded commitments of the CLOs(h)
4.3
 
 
 
 4.3
Consolidated contractual obligations4,154.0
 476.9
 517.1
 7,358.6
 12,506.6
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(g)
(89.2) (178.6) (178.4) (4,867.1) (5,313.3)
Capital commitments to Carlyle funds(e)
(3,378.3) 
 
 
 (3,378.3)
Unfunded commitments of the CLOs(h)
(4.3) 
 
 
 (4.3)
Carlyle Operating Entities contractual obligations$682.2
 $298.3
 $338.7
 $2,491.5
 $3,810.7
(1)The table above assumes that no prepayments are made on the senior and subordinated notes and that the outstanding balances, if any, on the senior credit facility and Global Credit revolving credit facility are repaid on the maturity dates of credit facilities, which are April 2027 and September 2024, respectively. The CLO term loans are included in the table above based on the earlier of the stated maturity date or the date the CLO is expected to be dissolved. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for the various maturity dates of the CLO term loans, senior notes and subordinated notes.
(a)The table above assumes that no prepayments are made on the CLO term loans, promissory notes or senior notes and that the outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility is repaid on the maturity date of the senior credit facility, which is May 5, 2020. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for the various maturity dates of the CLO term loans, promissory notes and senior notes.
(b)The interest rate on the debt obligations as of December 31, 2017 consist of: 3.875% on $500.0 million of senior notes, 5.625% on $600.0 million of senior notes, approximately 2.60% on $25.0 million remaining term loan under our senior credit facility, a range of approximately 1.75% to 3.29% for our CLO term loans, approximately 4.19% on $108.8 million of the NGP promissory note and approximately 3.36% on $53.9 million of our settlement promissory notes. Interest payments assume that no prepayments are made and loans are held until maturity.

(2)The interest rates on the debt obligations as of December 31, 2022 consist of: 3.500% on $425.0 million of senior notes, 5.650% on $350.0 million of senior notes, 5.625% on $600.0 million of senior notes, 4.625% on $500.0 million of subordinated notes, and a range of approximately 2.40% to
173
163







10.15% for our CLO term loans. Interest payments assume that no prepayments are made and loans are held until maturity with the exception of the CLO term loans, which are based on the earlier of the stated maturity date or the date the CLO is expected to be dissolved.
(c)These obligations represent our estimate of amounts to be paid on the contingent cash and other consideration obligations associated with our business acquisitions, strategic investment in NGP Management, payments related to the acquisition of secondary interests in Carlyle funds and other obligations.
(d)We lease office space in various countries around the world and maintain our headquarters in Washington, D.C., where we lease our primary office space under a non-cancelable lease agreement expiring on July 31, 2026. Our office leases in other locations expire in various years from 2018 through 2032. The amounts in this table represent the minimum lease payments required over the term of the lease.
(e)These obligations generally represent commitments by us to fund a portion of the purchase price paid for each investment made by our funds. These amounts are generally due on demand and are therefore presented in the less than one year category. A substantial majority of these investments is expected to be funded by senior Carlyle professionals and other professionals through our internal co-investment program. Of the $3.8 billion of unfunded commitments, approximately $3.4 billion is subscribed individually by senior Carlyle professionals, advisors and other professionals, with the balance funded directly by the Partnership.
(f)Represents obligations by the Partnership’s corporate taxpayers to make payments under the tax receivable agreement. Holders of partnership units in Carlyle Holdings may exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units in The Carlyle Group L.P. on a one-for-one basis. These exchanges may reduce the amount of tax that the corporate taxpayers would be required to pay in the future. The corporate taxpayers will pay to the limited partner of Carlyle Holdings making the exchange 85% of the amount of cash savings that the corporate taxpayers realize upon an exchange. See “Tax Receivable Agreement” below. Further, the amount and timing of payments is subject to change as the Partnership continues to analyze the 2017 Tax Reform Act (see Note 11 for more information about the Tax Reform Act).
(g)These obligations represent amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by the consolidated CLO vehicles. These obligations include interest to be paid on debt securities issued by the consolidated CLO vehicles. Interest payments assume that no prepayments are made and loans are held until maturity. For debt securities with rights only to the residual value of the CLO and no stated interest, no interest payments were included in this calculation. Interest payments on variable-rate debt securities are based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2017, at spreads to market rates pursuant to the debt agreements, and range from 0.74% to 8.96%.
(h)These obligations represent commitments of the CLOs to fund certain investments. These amounts are generally due on demand and are therefore presented in the less than one year category.
(3)These obligations represent our estimate of amounts to be paid on the contingent cash obligations associated with our acquisitions of Carlyle Aviation Partners and Abingworth, deferred consideration related to our strategic investment in Fortitude, and other obligations, as well as the deferred payment obligations described below. In connection with the Conversion, former holders of Carlyle Holdings partnership units will receive cash payments aggregating to approximately $344 million, which is equivalent to $1.50 per Carlyle Holdings partnership unit exchanged in the Conversion, payable in five annual installments of $0.30, the third of which occurred during the first quarter of 2022. The payment obligations are unsecured obligations of the Company or a subsidiary thereof, subordinated in right of payment to indebtedness of the Company and its subsidiaries, and do not bear interest.
(4)We lease office space in various countries around the world, including our largest offices in Washington, D.C., New York City, London and Hong Kong, which have non-cancelable lease agreements expiring in various years through 2036. The amounts in this table represent the minimum lease payments required over the term of the lease.
(5)These obligations generally represent commitments by us to fund a portion of the purchase price paid for each investment made by our funds. These amounts are generally due on demand and are therefore presented in the less than one year category. A substantial majority of these investments is expected to be funded by senior Carlyle professionals and other professionals through our internal co-investment program. Of the $3.9 billion of unfunded commitments to the funds, approximately $3.2 billion is subscribed individually by senior Carlyle professionals, advisors and other professionals, with the balance funded directly by the Company.
(6)In connection with our initial public offering, we entered into a tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships whereby we agreed to pay such limited partners 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax realized as a result of increases in tax basis resulting from exchanges of Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units of The Carlyle Group L.P. From and after the consummation of the Conversion, former holders of Carlyle Holdings partnership units do not have any rights to payments under the tax receivable agreement except for payment obligations pre-existing at the time of the Conversion with respect to exchanges that occurred prior to the Conversion. These obligations are more than offset by the future cash tax savings that we are expected to realize. A payment under the tax receivable agreement of $20.4 million was made in January 2023.
(7)These obligations represent amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by the consolidated CLO vehicles. These obligations include interest to be paid on debt securities issued by the consolidated CLO vehicles. Interest payments assume that no prepayments are made and loans are held until maturity. For debt securities with rights only to the residual value of the CLO and no stated interest, no interest payments were included in this calculation. Interest payments on variable-rate debt securities are based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2022, at spreads to market rates pursuant to the debt agreements, and range from 1.15% to 12.84%.
(8)These obligations represent commitments of the CLOs to fund certain investments. These amounts are generally due on demand and are therefore presented in the less than one year category.
Excluded from the table above are liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $12.3$39.3 million at December 31, 20172022 as we are unable to estimate when such amounts may be paid.


Contingent Cash Payments For Business Acquisitions and Strategic Investments
We have certain contingent cash obligations associated with our acquisition of Carlyle Aviation Partners and Abingworth which are accounted for as compensation expense and are accrued for over the service period. If earned, payments are made in the year following the performance year to which the payments relate. For our acquisition of Carlyle Aviation Partners, the contingent cash payments relate to an earn-out of up to $150.0 million that is payable upon the achievement of certain revenue and earnings performance targets during 2020 through 2025. To date, we have paid $53.6 million related to the Carlyle Aviation Partners earn-out. For our acquisition of Abingworth, the contingent cash obligations relate to future incentive payments of up to $130.0 million that are payable upon the achievement of certain performance targets during 2023 through 2028.
Based on the terms of the underlying contracts, the maximum amount that could be paid from contingent cash obligations associated with the acquisitions of Carlyle Aviation Partners and Abingworth as of December 31, 2022 is $226.4 million versus amounts recognized on the balance sheet of $76.5 million.
Risk Retention Rules

The Dodd-Frank Act requires sponsors of asset-backed securities, including CLOs,    We will continue to retain at least 5% ofcomply with the credit risk related to the assets that underlie asset-backed securities (referred to herein as the U.S. Risk Retention Rules). The U.S. Risk Retention Rules became effective on December 24, 2016 and apply to sponsors of CLOs issued thereafter. As a sponsor ofretention rules governing CLOs issued in Europe for which we currently comply with similar risk retention rules that have been in place since 2014. To comply with the U.S. Risk Retention Rules, we expect that we will contribute approximately $750 million to new CLOs issued over the next five years. Our contribution to the new CLOs will be funded throughare a varietysponsor, which require a combination of sources, including direct fundingcapital from the Partnership, fundingour balance sheet, commitments from senior Carlyle professionals, funding fromand/or third party investors, and limited recourse borrowing. The allocation of funding sources, and therefore the amount of capital required from the Partnership, will be determined in the future.
On February 9, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Risk Retention Rules do not apply to managers of open-market CLOs - CLOs for which the underlying assets are not transferred by the manager to the CLO issuer via a sale. The agencies have 45 days from the date of the decision to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for an en banc review, during which time the rule will remain effective. If such petition is not made, or if such petition is made but denied, the U.S. Court of Appeals' ruling will become effective 7 days later with retroactive effect on all existing open-market CLOs. We are in the process of reviewing this decision and its ultimate impact on our business.     

financing. For additional information related to the U.S. Risk Retention Rules, see “-RegulatoryPart I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation—Financial regulations and changes thereto in the United States could adversely affect our business and the possibility of increased regulatory focus could result in additional burdens and expenses on our business” within Item 1A.business.”
Guarantees
See Note 910 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information related to our material guarantees.
Indemnifications
In many of our service contracts, we agree to indemnify the third-party service provider under certain circumstances. The terms of the indemnities vary from contract to contract, and the amount of indemnification liability, if any, cannot be
164


determined and has not been included in the estimatetable above or recorded in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017.

174






Tax Receivable Agreement
Holders of partnership units in Carlyle Holdings (other than The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries), subject to the vesting and minimum retained ownership requirements and transfer restrictions applicable to such holders as set forth in the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, may (subject to the terms of the exchange agreement) exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for The Carlyle Group L.P. common units on a one-for-one basis. A Carlyle Holdings limited partner must exchange one partnership unit in each of the three Carlyle Holdings partnerships to effect an exchange for a common unit. The exchanges are expected to result in increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Carlyle Holdings. These increases in tax basis may increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions and therefore reduce the amount of tax that Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc. and any other corporate taxpayers would otherwise be required to pay in the future, although the IRS may challenge all or part of that tax basis increase, and a court could sustain such a challenge.
We have entered into a tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships that will provide for the payment by the corporate taxpayers to such parties of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that the corporate taxpayers realize as a result of these increases in tax basis and of certain other tax benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement. This payment obligation is an obligation of the corporate taxpayers and not of Carlyle Holdings. While the actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under this agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the price of our common units at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable and the amount and timing of our income, we expect that as a result of the size of the transfers and increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Carlyle Holdings, the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement will be substantial.2022.
See Note 210 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to our tax receivable agreement.indemnifications.
Contingent Obligations (Giveback)
Carried interest is ultimately realized when: (1) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of, (2) certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed, (3) the fund'sfund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return and (4) we have decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. Realized carried interest may be required to be returned by us in future periods if the funds'fund’s investment values decline below certain levels. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2022, we realized a giveback obligation of $10.7 million related to carried interest previously realized in Carlyle Strategic Partners III, of which $5.9 million was attributable to the Company. When the fair value of a fund'sfund’s investments remains constant or falls below certain return hurdles, previously recognized performance feesallocations are reversed.
See Note 910 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to our contingent obligations (giveback).
Other Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, we are a party to litigation, investigations, inquiries, employment-related matters, disputes and other potential claims. We discuss certain of these matters in Note 910 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Carlyle Common UnitsStock and Carlyle Holdings Partnership Units
Rollforwards of theshares of our common stock outstanding Carlyle Group L.P. common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 are as follows:
Shares as of December 31, 2021Shares
Issued
Shares
Forfeited
Shares
Exchanged
Shares Repurchased / RetiredShares as of December 31, 2022
The Carlyle Group Inc. common shares355,367,876 11,857,133 — — (4,926,359)362,298,650 

Units as of
December 31,
2016

Units Issued - DRUs
Units 
Forfeited

Units
Exchanged

Units
Repurchased / Retired

Units as of
December 31,
2017
The Carlyle Group L.P. common units84,610,951

8,907,265



6,596,624

(14,190)
100,100,650
Carlyle Holdings partnership units241,847,796



(437,314)
(6,596,624)


234,813,858
Total326,458,747

8,907,265

(437,314)


(14,190)
334,914,508



175






 
Units as of
December 31,
2015
 Units Issued - DRUs Units Forfeited Units Exchanged Units Repurchased / Retired 
Units as of
December 31,
2016
The Carlyle Group L.P. common units80,408,702
 6,860,931
 
 923,017
 (3,581,699) 84,610,951
Carlyle Holdings partnership units243,619,604
 
 (748,791) (923,017) (100,000) 241,847,796
Total324,028,306
 6,860,931
 (748,791) 
 (3,681,699) 326,458,747
Shares as of December 31, 2020Shares
Issued
Shares
Forfeited
Shares
Exchanged
Shares Repurchased / RetiredShares as of December 31, 2021
The Carlyle Group Inc. common shares353,520,576 5,114,394 — — (3,267,094)355,367,876 
The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. common unitsstock issued during the period from December 31, 2016 through December 31, 2017presented in the tables above relate to the vesting of the Partnership’s deferredCompany’s restricted commonstock units, shares issued pursuant to a program under which we may distribute realized performance allocation related compensation in fully vested, newly issued shares (see Note 15 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), 4.2 million and 0.6 million shares issued as part of the purchase price consideration in the CBAM and Abingworth transactions during the year ended December 31, 2017. Further, The Carlyle Group L.P. common units2022 (see Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), and shares issued and delivered in the table above includes 7,782 common units that the Partnership is expected to acquire from Carlyle Holdingsconnection with our equity method investment in future periods upon the vesting of certain of the Partnership’s unvested common units associated with the acquisition of the remaining 40% equity interest in AlpInvest in August 2013.
The Carlyle Holdings partnership units forfeitedNGP during the period fromyears ended December 31, 2016 through December 31, 2017 primarily relate to unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units that were forfeited when the holder ceased to provide services to the Partnership.
The Carlyle Holdings partnership units exchanged relate to the exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by NGP2022 and certain limited partners for common units on a one-for-one basis. Beginning with the second quarter of 2017, senior Carlyle professionals can exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units on a quarterly basis, subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement. We intend to facilitate an orderly exchange process to seek to minimize the impact on the trading price of our common units. During 2017, senior Carlyle professionals exchanged approximately 6.4 million of their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units.2021.
    
The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. common unitsstock repurchased during the period frompresented in the tables above relate to shares repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2016 through December 31, 2017 relate to units repurchased2022 and 2021 and subsequently retired as part of our unitstock repurchase program that was initiated in February 2016.programs.

The total unitsshares as of December 31, 20172022 as shown above exclude approximately 0.41.9 million net shares of common unitsstock in connection with the vesting of deferred restricted commonstock units subsequent to December 31, 20172022 that will participate in the unitholder distributioncommon stockholder dividend that will be paid in February 2018.on March 1, 2023.


The Carlyle Group L.P. common units issued during the period from December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2016 relate to the vesting of the Partnership’s deferred restricted common units during the year ended December 31, 2016. Further, The Carlyle Group L.P. common units in the table above includes 38,911 common units that the Partnership is expected to acquire from Carlyle Holdings in future periods upon the vesting of certain of the Partnership’s unvested common units associated with the acquisition of the remaining 40% equity interest in AlpInvest in August 2013.

The Carlyle Holdings partnership units forfeited during the period from December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2016 primarily relate to unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units that were forfeited when the holder ceased to provide services to the Partnership.

The Carlyle Holdings partnership units exchanged relate to the exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by NGP and certain limited partners for common units on a one-for-one basis.

The Carlyle Group L.P. common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units repurchased during the period from December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2016 relate to units repurchased and subsequently retired as part of our unit repurchase program that was initiated in February 2016.

The total units as of December 31, 2016 as shown above exclude approximately 1.1 million common units in connection with the vesting of deferred restricted common units subsequent to December 31, 2016 that participated in the unitholder distribution that was paid in March 2017 and include 11,490 common units repurchased that were pending settlement as of December 31, 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
165


disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates and judgments are based on historical information, information currently available to us and on various other assumptions management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from those estimates and we may change our estimates and assumptions in future evaluations. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We believe the critical accounting policies discussed below affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report.
Basis of Accounting. The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management has determined that the Company’s Funds are investment companies under U.S. GAAP for the purposes of financial reporting. U.S. GAAP for an investment company requires investments to be recorded at estimated fair value and the unrealized gains and/or losses in an investment’s fair value are recognized on a current basis in the statements of operations. Additionally, the Funds do not consolidate their majority-owned and controlled investments (the “Portfolio Companies”). In the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, the Company has retained the specialized accounting for the Funds.
Principles of Consolidation. The PartnershipCompany consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The PartnershipCompany describes the policies and procedures it uses in evaluating whether an entity is consolidated in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in

176






this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As part of its consolidation procedures, the PartnershipCompany evaluates: (1) whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, (2) whether the entity is a VIE, and (3) whether the Partnership'sCompany’s involvement would make it the primary beneficiary.
In evaluating whether the PartnershipCompany holds a variable interest, fees (including management fees, incentive fees and performance fees)allocations) that are customary and commensurate with the level of services provided, and where the PartnershipCompany does not hold other economic interests in the entity that would absorb more than an insignificant amount of the expected losses or returns of the entity, are not considered variable interests. The PartnershipCompany considers all economic interests, including indirect interests, to determine if a fee is considered a variable interest.
For those entities where the PartnershipCompany holds a variable interest, the PartnershipCompany determines whether each of these entities qualifies as a VIE and, if so, whether or not the PartnershipCompany is the primary beneficiary. The assessment of whether the entity is a VIE is generally performed qualitatively, which requires judgment. These judgments include: (a) determining whether the equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) evaluating whether the equity holders, as a group, can make decisions that have a significant effect on the economic performance of the entity, (c) determining whether two or more parties'parties’ equity interests should be aggregated, and (d) determining whether the equity investors have proportionate voting rights to their obligations to absorb losses or rights to receive returns from an entity.
For entities that are determined to be VIEs, the PartnershipCompany consolidates those entities where it has concluded it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined as the variable interest holder with (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In evaluating whether the PartnershipCompany is the primary beneficiary, the PartnershipCompany evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by the Partnership.Company.
Changes to these judgments could result in a change in the consolidation conclusion for a legal entity.
Entities that do not qualify as VIEs are generally assessed for consolidation as voting interest entities. Under the voting interest entity model, the PartnershipCompany consolidates those entities it controls through a majority voting interest.
Performance Fees.Allocations. As of December 31, 2022, we had performance allocations of $7.1 billion. Performance feesallocations consist principally of the allocation of profits from certain of the funds to which the PartnershipCompany is entitled (commonly known as carried interest). The PartnershipCompany is generally entitled to a 20% allocation (which can vary by fund) of the net realized income or gain as a carried interest after returning the invested capital, the allocation of preferred returns and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement). Carried interest is ultimately realized when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of, (ii) certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed, (iii) the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return and (iv) the PartnershipCompany has decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors.
While carried
166


Carried interest is recognized upon appreciation of the funds’ investment values above certain return hurdles set forth in each respective partnership agreement, the PartnershipCompany recognizes revenues attributable to performance feesallocations based upon the amount that would be due pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were terminated at that date. Accordingly, the amount recognized as investment income related to performance feesallocations reflects the Partnership’sCompany’s share of the gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. Because of the inherent uncertainty in measuring the fair value of investments in the absence of observable market prices as discussed below, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is reasonably possible that the difference could be material. If, at December 31, 2017,2022, all of the investments held by the Partnership'sCompany’s funds were deemed worthless, a possibility that management views as remote, the amount of realized and distributed carried interest subject to potential giveback would be $0.7$1.5 billion, on an after-tax basis where applicable.applicable, of which approximately $0.7 billion would be the responsibility of current and former senior Carlyle professionals.
See Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information related to performance fee allocations for various fund types, preferred return hurdle rates, the timing of performance fee revenueallocation recognition in investment income, and the potential for performance fee revenueallocation income reversal.    
Performance FeeAllocation Related Compensation. As of December 31, 2022, we had accrued performance allocations and incentive fee-related compensation of $3.6 billion. A portion of the performance feesallocations earned is due to employees and advisorsadvisers of the Partnership.Company. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the recognition of the related

177






performance feeallocation revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Accordingly, upon a reversal of performance feeallocation revenue, the related compensation expense, if any, is also reversed.
Income Taxes. Certain of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the PartnershipThe Carlyle Group Inc.is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the Carlyle Holdings partnerships arethus is subject to U.S. federal (and state local and foreignlocal) corporate income taxes at the entity level and the related tax provision attributable to the Partnership’s share of this income is reflected in the consolidated financial statements.taxes. Based on applicable federal, foreign, state and local tax laws, the PartnershipCompany records a provision for income taxes for certain entities. Tax positions taken by the PartnershipCompany are subject to periodic audit by U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxing authorities.
    As of December 31, 2022, we had gross deferred tax assets of $1.4 billion. The PartnershipCompany accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the period in which the difference is expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period of the change in the provision for income taxes. Further, deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected realization of available net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is recorded on the Partnership’sCompany’s gross deferred tax assets when it is more“more likely than notnot” that such asset will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of the Partnership’sCompany’s deferred tax assets, all evidence, both positive and negative, is evaluated. As of December 31, 2022, we recorded a valuation allowance of $56.7 million on our gross deferred tax assets. Items considered in this analysis include the ability to carry back losses, the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and expectations of future earnings.
The Partnership Lastly, the Company accounts for the tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) as incurred and therefore has approximately $170 million ofnot recorded deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017.taxes related to GILTI on its foreign subsidiaries. Changes in judgment as it relates to the realizability of these assets, as well as potential changes in corporate tax rates would have the effect of significantly reducing the value of the deferred tax assets. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted. The Act includes numerous changes in existing tax law, including a permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The rate reduction takes effect on January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate, the Partnership revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 using the newly enacted rate. The revaluation resulted in the recognition of additional provision for income taxes of approximately $113.0 million. In addition, the Partnership's tax receivable agreement liability was reduced by approximately $71.5 million due to the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate.
Under U.S. GAAP for income taxes, the amount of tax benefit to be recognized is the amount of benefit that is more“more likely than notnot” to be sustained upon examination. The PartnershipCompany analyzes its tax filing positions in all of the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as for all open tax years in these jurisdictions. If, based on this analysis, the PartnershipCompany determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist, a liability is established, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. The PartnershipCompany recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in the provision for income taxes. If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax positions would be recorded as a reduction in the provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2022, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $39.3 million, which if recognized would result in a reduction in the provision for income taxes of $27.1 million.
Fair Value Measurement. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which ranks the observability of market price inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, the characteristics specific to the financial instrument and the state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices, or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets, will generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.
Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed based on the observability of inputs used in the determination of fair values, as follows:
Level I — inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices available in active markets for identical instruments as of the reporting date. The type of financial instruments included in Level I include unrestricted securities, including equities and derivatives, listed in active markets. The Partnership does not adjust the quoted price for these instruments, even in situations where the Partnership holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level II — inputs to the valuation methodology are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The type of financial instruments in this category includes less liquid and restricted securities listed in active markets, securities traded in other than

178






active markets, government and agency securities, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on observable inputs.
Level III — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to overall fair value measurement. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in this category include investments in privately-held entities, non-investment grade residual interests in securitizations, collateralized loan obligations, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given financial instrument is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.
In the absence of observable market prices, the PartnershipCompany values its investments and its funds’ investments using valuation methodologies applied on a consistent basis. For some investments little market activity may exist. Management'sManagement’s determination of fair value is then based on the best information available in the circumstances and may incorporate management'smanagement’s own assumptions and involves a significant degree of judgment, taking into consideration a combination of internal and external factors, including the appropriate risk adjustments for non-performance and liquidity risks. Investments for which market prices are not observable include private investments in the equity of operating companies and real estate properties, and certain debt positions. The valuation technique for each of these investments is described in Note 43 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
167


Valuations of the funds’ investments are used in the calculation of accrued performance allocations, discussed above. The valuation methodologies can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance and accrued performance fees.allocations. Because there is significant uncertainty in the valuation of, or in the stability of the value of, illiquid investments, the fair values of such investments as reflected in an investment fund’s net asset value do not necessarily reflect the prices that would be obtained by us on behalf of the investment fund when such investments are realized. Realizations at values significantly lower than the values at which investments have been reflected in prior fund net asset values would result in reduced earnings or losses for the applicable fund, the loss of potential carried interestperformance allocations and incentive fees and in the case of our hedge funds, management fees. Changes in values attributed to investments from quarter to quarter may result in volatility in the net asset values and results of operations that we report from period to period. Also, a situation where asset values turn out to be materially different than values reflected in prior fund net asset values could cause investors to lose confidence in us, which could in turn result in difficulty in raising additional funds. See Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Factors—Risks Related to Our Company — Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance and accrued performance fees.allocations.
Principal Equity-Method Investments. The PartnershipCompany accounts for all investments in which it has or is otherwise presumed to have significant influence, including investments in the unconsolidated funds and strategic investments, using the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of equity-method investments is determined based on amounts invested by the Partnership,Company, adjusted for the equity in earnings or losses of the investee allocated based on the respective partnership or other agreement, less distributions received. The PartnershipCompany evaluates its equity-method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable.

Our equity-method investment in NGP entitles us to 55% of the management fee-related revenue of the NGP entities that serve as advisors to the NGP Energy Funds and is subject to impairment under the U.S. GAAP accounting for equity method investments. We evaluate our equity method investment in NGP for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable, but no less than quarterly. For example, challenges with fundraising or lower future management fees could cause an impairment of our investment in NGP in the future. As of December 31, 2022, we continue to believe that our investment in NGP is not impaired.
Equity-based Compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized $154.0 million in equity-based compensation expense. Compensation expense relating to the issuance of equity-based awards to Carlyle employees is measured at fair value on the grant date. The compensation expense for awards that vest over a future service period is recognized over the relevant service period on a straight-line basis, adjusted for estimated forfeitures of awards that are not expected to vest. The compensation expense for awards that do not require future service is recognized immediately. Upon the end of the service period, compensation expense is adjusted to account for the actual forfeiture rate. Cash settled equity-based awards are classified as liabilities and are re-measured at the end of each reporting period. The compensation expense for awards that contain performance conditions is recognized when it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved; in certain instances, such compensation expense may be recognized prior to the grant date of the award.
Equity-based awards issued to non-employees are recognized as general, administrative and other expenses. The grant-date fair value of equity-based awards granted to Carlyle’s non-employee directors is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The cost of services received in exchange for an equity-based award issued to non-employees who are not directors is measured at each vesting date, and is not measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award unless the

179






award is vested at the grant date. Equity-based awards that require the satisfaction of future service criteria are recognized over the relevant service period, adjusted for estimated forfeitures of awards that are not expected to vest, based on the fair value of the award on each reporting date and adjusted for the actual fair value of the award at each vesting date. Accordingly, the measured value of the award will not be finalized until the vesting date.
In determining the aggregate fair value of any award grants, we make judgments among others, as to the grant-date fair value, and, until January 1, 2017, estimated forfeiture rates. Each of these elements, particularly the forfeiture assumptions useddiscount related to awards that do not participate in valuing our equity awards, are subject to significant judgment and variability anddividends during the impact of changesvesting period. A decrease in such elements onthe discount would result in an increase in equity-based compensation expense could be material. The Partnership adopted ASU 2016-9, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting on January 1, 2017. Upon adoption, the Partnership elected to recognize equity-based award forfeitures in the period they occur as a reversal of previously recognized compensation expense. The reduction is compensation expense is determined based on the specific awards forfeited during that period.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill. The Partnership’sCompany’s intangible assets consist of acquired contractual rights to earn future fee income, including management and advisory fees, customer relationships, and acquired trademarks. Finite-livedWe allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. These valuations require management to make significant judgements, assumptions and estimates. The allocation of purchase consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities affects our amortization expense, as acquired finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, whereas goodwill is not amortized.
As of December 31, 2022, we had intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, of $897.8 million, including $103.9 million of goodwill. Our finite-lived intangible assets have estimated useful lives which range from fivefour to teneight years, and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The Partnership’s intangible assets include acquired contractual rights for fee income related to open-ended funds.  Open-ended funds are subject to redemptions on a quarterly or more frequent basis and investors can generally decide to exit their fund investments at any time.  The resulting inherent volatility in fee income derived from these contractual rights increases the degree of judgment and estimates used by management in evaluating such intangible assets for impairment.  Actual results could differ from management’s estimates and assumptions and such differences could result in a material impairment.


Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired and is recorded in the functional currency of the acquired entity. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and between annual tests when events and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.
Impairment testing requires the assessment of both qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to whether there has been a significant or adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset and/or significant or adverse changes in cash flow projections or earnings forecasts. These assessments require management to make judgements, assumptions and estimates. As of December 31, 2022, we continue to believe our intangible assets and goodwill are not impaired.
168


Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We discuss the recent accounting pronouncements in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary exposure to market risk is related to our role as general partner or investment advisor to our investment funds and the sensitivities to movements in the fair value of their investments, including the effect on management fees, incentive fees, performance feesallocations and principal investment income.
Although our investment funds share many common themes, each of our alternative asset management asset classes runs its own investment and risk management processes, subject to our overall risk tolerance and philosophy. The investment process of our investment funds involves a comprehensive due diligence approach, including review of reputation of shareholders and management, company size and sensitivity of cash flow generation, business sector and competitive risks, portfolio fit, exit risks and other key factors highlighted by the deal team. Key investment decisions are subject to approval by both the fund-level managing directors, as well as the investment committee, which is generally comprised of one or more of the three founding partners, one “sector” head, one or more advisors and senior investment professionals associated with that particular fund. Once an investment in a portfolio company has been made, our fund teams closely monitor the performance of the portfolio company, generally through frequent contact with management and the receipt of financial and management reports.
Effect on Fund Management Fees
Management fees will only be directly affected by short-term changes in market conditions to the extent they are based on NAV or represent permanent impairments of value. These management fees will be increased (or reduced) in direct proportion to the effect of changes in the market value of our investments in the related funds. In addition, the terms of the governing agreements with respect to certain of our carry funds provide that the management fee base will be reduced when the aggregate fair market value of a fund’s investments is below its cost. The proportion of our management fees that are based on NAV primarily hedge funds, is dependent on the number and types of investment funds in existence and the current stage of

180






each fund’s life cycle. In 2016, we conducted a review of our Global Credit segment in order to realign and reorganize certain of the segment's operations. As a result, we have exited our hedge fund business (ESG in 2016 and Claren Road in January 2017) and, as a result of settlements reached during 2017 with investors in two commodities investment vehicles managed by Vermillion, we have completed the exit of the commodities investment advisory business and other hedge fund investment advisory businesses that we had acquired from 2010 to 2014. Therefore, for the year ended December 31, 2017, an immaterial amount of our fund management fees were based on the NAV of the applicable funds.
Effect on Performance Fees

Allocations
Performance feesallocations reflect revenue primarily from carried interest on our carry funds and incentive fees from our hedge funds. In our discussion of “Key Financial Measures” and “Critical Accounting Policies”,Policies,” we disclose that performance feesallocations are recognized upon appreciation of the valuation of our funds’ investments above certain return hurdles and are based upon the amount that would be due to Carlyle at each reporting date as if the funds were liquidated at their then-current fair values. Changes in the fair value of the funds’ investments may materially impact performance feesallocations depending upon the respective funds’ performance to date as compared to its hurdle rate and the related carry waterfall.


The following table summarizes the incremental impact, including our Consolidated Funds, of a 10% change in total remaining fair value by segment as of December 31, 20172022 on our performance feeallocations revenue:
10% Increase
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
10% Decrease
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,913.5 $(2,113.9)
Global Credit191.9 (112.3)
Global Investment Solutions255.6 (248.3)
Total$2,361.0 $(2,474.5)
169

 
10% Increase
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
 
10% Decrease
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in Millions)
Corporate Private Equity$734.7
 $(602.8)
Real Assets265.1
 (387.4)
Global Credit22.1
 (17.4)
Investment Solutions131.4
 (91.3)
Total$1,153.3
 $(1,098.9)

The following table summarizes the incremental impact of a 10% change in Level III remaining fair value by segment as of December 31, 20172022 on our performance feeallocations revenue:
 
10% Increase
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
 
10% Decrease
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in Millions)
Corporate Private Equity$723.0
 $(591.4)
Real Assets212.5
 (351.5)
Global Credit17.9
 (17.0)
Investment Solutions107.0
 (88.4)
Total$1,060.4
 $(1,048.3)
10% Increase
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
10% Decrease
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,828.4 $(2,006.7)
Global Credit186.6 (110.8)
Global Investment Solutions247.8 (241.4)
Total$2,262.8 $(2,358.9)
The effect of the variability in performance feeallocations revenue would be in part offset by performance feeallocation related compensation. See also related disclosure in “Segment Analysis.”

181






Effect on Assets Under Management
Generally, our Fee-earning assets under management are not affected by changes in valuation. However, total assets under management is impacted by valuation changes to net asset value. The table below shows the remaining fair value and the percentage amount classified as Level III investments as defined within the fair value standards of U.S. GAAP:
Remaining Fair ValuePercentage Amount
Classified as Level
III Investments
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$123,673 95 %
Global Credit$132,924 75 %
Global Investment Solutions$43,521 97 %
 Remaining Fair Value 
Percentage Amount
Classified as Level
III Investments
 (Dollars in Millions)
Corporate Private Equity$42,637
 93%
Real Assets$26,376
 86%
Global Credit (1)$26,365
 98%
Investment Solutions$30,157
 97%
 (1)Comprised of approximately $20.2 billion (100% Level III Investments) in our structured credit/other structured products funds, $3.9 billion (87% Level III Investments) in our carry funds, and $2.3 billion (95% Level III Investments) in our business development companies.
Exchange Rate Risk
Our investment funds hold investments that are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies that may be affected by movements in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar currencies. Non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and the consolidated statements of operations accounts are translated at rates of exchange in effect throughout the year. Additionally, a portion of our management fees are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. We estimate that as of December 31, 2017,2022, if there was a 10% decline in the rate of exchange of all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, strengthened 10% against all foreign currencies, the impact on our consolidated results of operations for the year then ended would be as follows: (a) fund management fees would decrease by $84.2$49.5 million, (b) performance feesallocations would decrease by $48.4$72.0 million and (c) principal investment income would increase by $6.7 million.remain flat.
Interest Rate Risk
We have obligations under our term loan facility, CLO term loans and promissory notes that accrue interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes may therefore affect the amount of interest payments, future earnings and cash flows.
The term loan under our senior credit facility incurs interest at LIBOR plus an applicate rate. The CLO term loans incur interest at EURIBOR or LIBOR plus an applicable rate. The promissory notes incur interest at the three month LIBOR plus an applicable rate. We do not have any interest rate swaps in place for these borrowings.


Based on our debt obligations payable as of December 31, 2017,2022, we estimate that interest expense relating to variable rates would increase by approximately $1.7$4.2 million on an annual basis in the event interest rates were to increase by one percentage point.
Credit Risk
Certain of our investment funds hold derivative instruments that contain an element of risk in the event that the counterparties are unable to meet the terms of such agreements. We minimize our risk exposure by limiting the counterparties with which we enter into contracts to banks and investment banks who meet established credit and capital guidelines. We do not expect any counterparty to default on its obligations and therefore do not expect to incur any loss due to counterparty default.



182
170







ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Thethe Shareholders and Board of Directors and Unitholders of The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. (the “Partnership”)Company) as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, and2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in partners’ capital and redeemable non-controlling interests in consolidated entities,equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the PartnershipCompany at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)and our report dated February 15, 2018 9, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of ASU No. 2015-02
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership changed its evaluation of whether to consolidate certain types of legal entities in 2016 due to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.
Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership'sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the PartnershipCompany in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

171


Measurement of principal equity method investments, including accrued performance allocations
Description of the matterAt December 31, 2022, the carrying value of the Company’s investments totaled approximately $10.8 billion and included principal equity method investments in sponsored unconsolidated funds (collectively, the “funds” or each, a “fund”) of approximately $3.7 billion and accrued performance allocations of approximately $7.1 billion. As discussed in Notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, a significant input to the measurement of the Company’s principal equity method investments in the funds, including accrued performance allocations, is management’s estimate of the fair value of the investments held by each fund. Management estimates the fair value of the funds’ investments, including investments in the equity of private operating companies, real estate properties and certain debt positions, by applying the methodologies outlined in Notes 3 and 6 and using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions.
 
Auditing management’s estimates of the fair value of the funds’ investments, valued using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions, was complex and highly judgmental because these investments exhibit higher estimation uncertainty.

How we addressed the matter in our auditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the funds’ investment valuation process. This included management's review controls over the assessment of the methodologies, significant inputs and assumptions included in the fair value estimates, as well as management’s review around the completeness, accuracy and reasonableness of the data used in these estimates.
 
Our audit procedures related to valuations using significant unobservable inputs included, among others, assessing whether the valuation methodologies used were appropriate and testing the mathematical accuracy of the valuation models.

For a sample of investments, we obtained management’s valuation models and compared objective inputs used in the models to agreements or underlying source documents provided by the Company. We also assessed the appropriateness of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the fair value estimates by comparing them to underlying support or available market data and evaluating the appropriateness of any significant adjustments. Our procedures varied based on the nature of the fund investment selected for testing.

For example, for certain investments in the equity of private operating companies, we assessed the appropriateness of management’s determination of public market comparable companies and similar transactions. For these selected investments, we also evaluated significant adjustments applied to the selected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiple or discount rate derived from the comparable companies by considering investee specific and relevant market information.

For a sample of investments that were sold during the year, we performed procedures to assess the historical reasonableness of management’s estimates. We also reviewed management’s assessment of subsequent events and transactions and considered whether they corroborated or contradicted the year-end estimates.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




We have served as the Partnership'sCompany’s auditor since 2002.
Tysons, VA

February 15, 20189, 2023




183
172







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Thethe Shareholders and Board of Directors and Unitholders of The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc. (the “Partnership”)Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of The Carlyle Group L.P.the Company as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in partners’ capital and redeemable non-controlling interests in consolidated entities,equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes and our report dated February 15, 20189, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Partnership'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal ControlsControl Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the PartnershipCompany in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Tysons, VA
February 15, 2018

9, 2023
184
173



The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Inc.




Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, December 31,
2017 2016 20222021
Assets   Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,000.1
 $670.9
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds377.6
 761.5
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds209.0 147.8 
Restricted cash28.7
 13.1
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 
Corporate treasury investments376.3
 190.2
Corporate treasury investments20.0 — 
Accrued performance fees3,670.6
 2,481.1
Investments1,624.3
 1,107.0
Investments, including accrued performance allocations of $7,117.7 and $8,133.0 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectivelyInvestments, including accrued performance allocations of $7,117.7 and $8,133.0 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively10,767.9 10,832.0 
Investments of Consolidated Funds4,534.3
 3,893.7
Investments of Consolidated Funds6,894.4 6,661.0 
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net257.1
 227.2
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net579.4 379.6 
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net50.8
 29.5
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net101.9 138.8 
Receivables and inventory of a real estate VIE
 145.4
Fixed assets, net100.4
 106.1
Fixed assets, net139.9 143.9 
Lease right-of-use assets, netLease right-of-use assets, net337.0 361.1 
Deposits and other54.1
 39.4
Deposits and other78.4 61.7 
Other assets of a real estate VIE
 31.5
Intangible assets, net35.9
 42.0
Intangible assets, net897.8 34.9 
Deferred tax assets170.4
 234.4
Deferred tax assets15.8 14.5 
Total assets$12,280.6
 $9,973.0
Total assets$21,403.0 $21,250.4 
Liabilities and partners’ capital   
Liabilities and equityLiabilities and equity
Debt obligations$1,573.6
 $1,265.2
Debt obligations$2,271.7 $2,071.6 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds4,303.8
 3,866.3
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds5,905.2 5,890.0 
Loans payable of a real estate VIE at fair value (principal amount of $144.4 million as of December 31, 2016)
 79.4
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities355.1
 369.8
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities369.2 379.7 
Accrued compensation and benefits2,222.6
 1,661.8
Accrued compensation and benefits4,320.9 4,955.0 
Due to affiliates229.9
 223.6
Due to affiliates362.5 388.1 
Deferred revenue82.1
 54.0
Deferred revenue126.4 120.8 
Deferred tax liabilities75.6
 76.6
Deferred tax liabilities402.7 487.1 
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds422.1
 637.0
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds279.3 683.9 
Other liabilities of a real estate VIE
 124.5
Lease liabilitiesLease liabilities502.9 537.8 
Accrued giveback obligations66.8
 160.8
Accrued giveback obligations40.9 30.2 
Total liabilities9,331.6
 8,519.0
Total liabilities14,581.7 15,544.2 
Commitments and contingencies
 
Commitments and contingencies
Series A preferred units (16,000,000 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017)387.5
 
Partners’ capital (common units, 100,100,650 and 84,610,951 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)701.8
 403.1
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000,000 shares authorized (362,298,650 and 355,367,876 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000,000 shares authorized (362,298,650 and 355,367,876 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)3.6 3.6 
Additional paid-in capitalAdditional paid-in capital3,138.5 2,717.6 
Retained earningsRetained earnings3,401.1 2,805.3 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(72.7) (95.2)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(322.2)(247.5)
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities404.7
 277.8
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities600.3 427.2 
Non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings1,527.7
 868.3
Total partners’ capital2,949.0
 1,454.0
Total liabilities and partners’ capital$12,280.6
 $9,973.0
Total equityTotal equity6,821.3 5,706.2 
Total liabilities and equityTotal liabilities and equity$21,403.0 $21,250.4 
See accompanying notes.

174
185



The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in millions, except unitshare and per unitshare data)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Revenues
Fund management fees$2,030.1 $1,667.5 $1,486.0 
Incentive fees63.7 48.8 37.0 
Investment income
Performance allocations1,327.5 6,084.6 1,635.9 
Principal investment income (loss)570.5 637.3 (540.7)
Total investment income1,898.0 6,721.9 1,095.2 
Interest and other income135.9 90.7 89.6 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds311.0 253.2 226.8 
Total revenues4,438.7 8,782.1 2,934.6 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits1,052.0 908.0 849.6 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation719.9 2,961.0 779.1 
Total compensation and benefits1,925.9 4,032.1 1,733.7 
General, administrative and other expenses575.8 431.7 349.3 
Interest110.4 113.3 94.0 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds211.6 178.5 163.5 
Other non-operating expenses (income)1.0 1.5 (7.2)
Total expenses2,824.7 4,757.1 2,333.3 
Other income (loss)
Net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds(41.5)2.5 (21.3)
Income before provision for income taxes1,572.5 4,027.5 580.0 
Provision for income taxes287.8 982.3 197.2 
Net income1,284.7 3,045.2 382.8 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities59.7 70.5 34.6 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. Common Stockholders$1,225.0 $2,974.7 $348.2 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. per common share (see Note 14)
Basic$3.39 $8.37 $0.99 
Diluted$3.35 $8.20 $0.97 
Weighted-average common shares
Basic361,278,064 355,241,653 350,464,315 
Diluted365,707,722 362,574,564 358,393,802 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Revenues     
Fund management fees$1,026.9
 $1,076.1
 $1,085.2
Performance fees     
Realized1,097.3
 1,129.5
 1,441.9
Unrealized996.6
 (377.7) (617.0)
Total performance fees2,093.9
 751.8
 824.9
Investment income (loss)     
Realized70.4
 112.9
 32.9
Unrealized161.6
 47.6
 (17.7)
Total investment income (loss)232.0
 160.5
 15.2
Interest and other income36.7
 23.9
 18.6
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds177.7
 166.9
 975.5
Revenue of a real estate VIE109.0
 95.1
 86.8
Total revenues3,676.2
 2,274.3
 3,006.2
Expenses     
Compensation and benefits     
Base compensation652.7
 647.1
 632.2
Equity-based compensation320.3
 334.6
 378.0
Performance fee related     
Realized520.7
 580.5
 650.5
Unrealized467.6
 (227.4) (139.6)
Total compensation and benefits1,961.3
 1,334.8
 1,521.1
General, administrative and other expenses276.8
 521.1
 712.8
Interest65.5
 61.3
 58.0
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds197.6
 128.5
 1,039.3
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation202.5
 207.6
 144.6
Other non-operating income(71.4) (11.2) (7.4)
Total expenses2,632.3
 2,242.1
 3,468.4
Other income     
Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds88.4
 13.1
 864.4
Income before provision for income taxes1,132.3
 45.3
 402.2
Provision for income taxes124.9
 30.0
 2.1
Net income1,007.4
 15.3
 400.1
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities72.5
 41.0
 537.9
Net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings934.9
 (25.7) (137.8)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings690.8
 (32.1) (119.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.244.1
 6.4
 (18.4)
Net income attributable to Series A Preferred Unitholders6.0
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. Common Unitholders$238.1
 $6.4
 $(18.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. per common unit (see Note 13)     
Basic$2.58
 $0.08
 $(0.24)
Diluted$2.38
 $(0.08) $(0.30)
Weighted-average common units     
Basic92,136,959
 82,714,178
 74,523,935
Diluted100,082,548
 308,522,990
 298,739,382
Distributions declared per common unit$1.24
 $1.68
 $3.39

Substantially all revenue is earned from affiliates of the Partnership.Company. See accompanying notes.

175
186



The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in millions)
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net income$1,007.4
 $15.3
 $400.1
Other comprehensive income (loss)     
Foreign currency translation adjustments95.8
 (54.6) (801.0)
Cash flow hedges     
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in interest expense
 1.9
 2.3
Defined benefit plans     
Unrealized gain (loss) for the period(0.8) (6.8) 4.1
Reclassification adjustment for unrecognized loss during the period, net, included in base compensation expense1.2
 
 0.3
Other comprehensive gain (loss)96.2
 (59.5) (794.3)
Comprehensive income (loss)1,103.6
 (44.2) (394.2)
Comprehensive loss attributable to partners’ capital appropriated for Consolidated Funds
 
 63.7
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(108.1) 10.7
 (143.8)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in consolidated entities
 (0.2) 185.4
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings995.5
 (33.7) (288.9)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings(734.3) 39.5
 239.1
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.$261.2
 $5.8
 $(49.8)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Net income$1,284.7 $3,045.2 $382.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(16.0), $1.2 and $(33.5) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively(107.8)(56.3)49.6 
Unrealized losses on Fortitude available-for-sale securities, net of income tax benefit of $(5.3) for the year ended December 31, 2020 — (20.0)
Defined benefit plans, net
Unrealized net income (loss) for the period, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $4.6, $2.9 and $(2.3) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively14.5 9.5 (9.0)
Less: reclassification adjustment for unrecognized gain during the period included in base compensation expense, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $0.3, $0.7 and $0.6 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively1.0 2.1 1.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(92.3)(44.7)22.4 
Comprehensive income1,192.4 3,000.5 405.2 
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities42.1 64.6 37.6 
Comprehensive income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.$1,150.3 $2,935.9 $367.6 
See accompanying notes.



187
176



The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital and Redeemable Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesEquity
(Dollars and unitsshares in millions)
Common
Units
Common SharesPartners’
Capital
Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit)Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesNon-
controlling
Interests in
Carlyle
Holdings
Total
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019117.8 — $703.8 $— $— $— $(85.2)$333.5 $2,017.5 $2,969.6 
Reclassification resulting from Conversion - Partners' Capital(117.8)117.8 (703.8)1.2 702.6 — — — — — 
Reclassification resulting from Conversion - Non-controlling Interest in Carlyle Holdings— 229.4 — 2.3 2,180.9 — (165.7)— (2,017.5)— 
Shares repurchased— (1.1)— — (26.4)— — — — (26.4)
Tax effects resulting from Conversion— — — — (62.9)— 22.8 — — (40.1)
Equity-based compensation— — — — 113.4 — — — — 113.4 
Shares issued for equity-based awards— 7.4 — — — — — — — — 
Contributions— — — — — — — 210.0 210.0 
Distributions— — — — (351.3)— — (77.8)— (429.1)
Net income— — — — — 348.2 — 34.6 — 382.8 
Deconsolidation of Consolidated Entities— — — — (10.1)— — (262.3)— (272.4)
Currency translation adjustments— — — — — — 46.6 3.0 — 49.6 
Unrealized loss on Fortitude available-for-sale securities— — — — — — (20.0)— — (20.0)
Defined benefit plans, net— — — — — — (7.2)— — (7.2)
Balance at December 31, 2020 353.5 $ $3.5 $2,546.2 $348.2 $(208.7)$241.0 $ $2,930.2 
 
Common
Units
 Preferred Equity 
Partners’
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Partners’
Capital
Appropriated for
Consolidated
Funds
 Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities 
Non-
controlling
Interests in
Carlyle
Holdings
 
Total
Partners’
Capital
 
Redeemable
Non-controlling
Interests in
Consolidated
Entities
Balance at December 31, 201467.8
 
 $566.0
 $(39.0) $184.5
 $6,446.4
 $1,936.6
 $9,094.5
 $3,761.5
Reallocation of ownership interests in Carlyle Holdings0.1
 
 34.5
 (12.6) 
 
 (21.9) 
 
Exchange of units in public offering, net of issuance costs7.0
 
 52.5
 (7.1) 
 
 (45.4) 
 
Issuance of common units related to acquisitions0.1
 
 0.5
 
 
 
 1.8
 2.3
 
Deferred tax effects resulting from acquisition of interests in Carlyle Holdings
 
 5.5
 
 
 
 
 5.5
 
Equity-based compensation
 
 92.8
 
 
 
 283.2
 376.0
 
Net delivery of vested common units5.4
 
 3.5
 
 
 
 0.5
 4.0
 
Contributions
 
 
 
 
 1,090.5
 
 1,090.5
 1,286.1
Distributions
 
 (251.0) 
 
 (3,230.8) (848.5) (4,330.3) (2,036.2)
Initial consolidation of a Consolidated Fund
 
 
 
 
 43.9
 
 43.9
 19.9
Net income (loss)
 
 (18.4) 
 (54.4) 777.7
 (119.4) 585.5
 (185.4)
Currency translation adjustments
 
 
 (32.9) (9.3) (633.9) (124.9) (801.0) 
Defined benefit plans, net
 
 
 1.0
 
 
 3.4
 4.4
 
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments
 
 
 0.5
 
 
 1.8
 2.3
 
Balance at December 31, 201580.4
 
 485.9
 (90.1) 120.8
 4,493.8
 1,067.2
 6,077.6
 2,845.9
Reallocation of ownership interests in Carlyle Holdings0.9
 
 18.1
 (4.5) 
 
 (13.6) 
 
Units repurchased(3.6) 
 (57.4) 
 
 
 (1.5)��(58.9) 
Deferred tax effects resulting from acquisition of interests in Carlyle Holdings

 
 0.4









0.4


Equity-based compensation
 
 97.4
 
 
 
 278.8
 376.2
 
Net delivery of vested common units6.9
 
 (6.2) 
 
 
 (0.5) (6.7) 
Contributions
 
 
 
 
 119.3
 
 119.3
 
Distributions
 
 (140.9) 
 
 (107.9) (422.6) (671.4) (1.5)
Deconsolidation of ESG
 
 (0.6)




(5.6)


(6.2)
(6.3)
Deconsolidation of Consolidated Funds upon adoption of ASU 2015-02 and the impact of adoption of ASU 2014-13 (see Note 2)
 
 
 
 (120.8)
(4,211.1)

 (4,331.9) (2,838.3)
Net income (loss)
 
 6.4
 
 
 40.8
 (32.1) 15.1
 0.2
Currency translation adjustments
 
 
 0.7
 
 (51.5) (3.8) (54.6) 
Defined benefit plans, net
 
 
 (1.8) 
 
 (5.0) (6.8) 
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments
 
 
 0.5
 
 
 1.4
 1.9
 
Balance at December 31, 201684.6
 
 403.1
 (95.2) $
 277.8
 868.3
 1,454.0
 
Reallocation of ownership interests in Carlyle Holdings
 
 33.1
 (8.3) 
 
 (24.8) 
 
Exchange of Carlyle Holdings units for common units6.6
 
 41.0
 (6.5) 
 
 (34.5) 
 
Units repurchased
 
 (0.2) 
 
 
 
 (0.2) 
Equity issued in connection with preferred units
 387.5
 
 
 
 
 
 387.5
 
Deferred tax effects resulting from acquisition of interests in Carlyle Holdings

 
 8.0
 
 
 
 
 8.0
 
Equity-based compensation
 
 104.3
 
 
 
 254.3
 358.6
 
Net delivery of vested common units8.9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contributions
 
 
 
 
 119.2
 
 119.2
 
Distributions
 (6.0) (118.1) 
 
 (118.0) (295.6) (537.7) 
Net income
 6.0
 238.1
 
 
 72.5
 690.8
 1,007.4
 
Deconsolidation of a consolidated entity
 
 (4.3) 20.2
 
 17.6
 38.7
 72.2
 
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of ASU 2016-09
 
 (3.2) 
 
 
 (13.0) (16.2) 
Currency translation adjustments
 
 
 17.0
 
 35.6
 43.2
 95.8
 
Defined benefit plans, net
 
 
 0.1
 
 
 0.3
 0.4
 
Balance at December 31, 2017100.1
 $387.5
 $701.8
 $(72.7) $
 $404.7
 $1,527.7
 $2,949.0
 $















Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollars and shares in millions)
Common SharesCommon
Stock
Additional Paid-in CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit)Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesTotal
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2020353.5 $3.5 $2,546.2 $348.2 $(208.7)$241.0 $2,930.2 
Shares repurchased(3.2)  (161.8)  (161.8)
Equity-based compensation 0.1 166.6    166.7 
Shares issued for equity-based awards5.0       
Shares issued for performance allocations0.1  4.8    4.8 
Contributions     216.2 216.2 
Distributions   (355.8) (94.6)(450.4)
Net income   2,974.7  70.5 3,045.2 
Currency translation adjustments    (50.4)(5.9)(56.3)
Defined benefit plans, net    11.6  11.6 
Balance at December 31, 2021355.4 $3.6 $2,717.6 $2,805.3 $(247.5)$427.2 $5,706.2 
Shares repurchased(5.0)$ $ $(185.6)$ $ $(185.6)
Equity-based compensation  162.5    162.5 
Shares issued for equity-based awards6.2       
Shares issued for performance allocations0.9  38.9    38.9 
Shares issued related to the acquisition of CBAM4.2  194.5    194.5 
Shares issued related to the acquisition of Abingworth0.6  25.0    25.0 
Contributions     391.2 391.2 
Distributions   (443.6) (216.8)(660.4)
Net income   1,225.0  59.7 1,284.7 
Deconsolidation of a Consolidated Entity     (47.6)(47.6)
Non-controlling interests related to the acquisition of Abingworth     4.2 4.2 
Currency translation adjustments    (90.2)(17.6)(107.8)
Defined benefit plans, net    15.5  15.5 
Balance at December 31, 2022362.3 $3.6 $3,138.5 $3,401.1 $(322.2)$600.3 $6,821.3 
See accompanying notes.


188
177


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)

 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income$1,284.7 $3,045.2 $382.8 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization147.4 52.0 52.1 
Right-of-use asset impairment, net of broker fees— 24.8 — 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Non-cash performance allocations and incentive fees, net393.6 (1,670.7)(631.8)
Non-cash principal investment (income) loss(553.4)(618.5)534.4 
Other non-cash amounts(10.3)29.1 (2.9)
Consolidated Funds related:
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on investments of Consolidated Funds408.1 (76.6)29.1 
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss from loans payable of Consolidated Funds(366.6)74.1 (7.8)
Purchases of investments by Consolidated Funds(3,826.2)(5,407.0)(3,140.0)
Proceeds from sale and settlements of investments by Consolidated Funds2,860.4 4,888.7 2,013.8 
Non-cash interest income, net(12.1)(11.8)(8.1)
Change in cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds(61.0)30.3 13.9 
Change in other receivables held at Consolidated Funds19.3 (45.7)(5.4)
Change in other liabilities held at Consolidated Funds(336.8)115.6 220.9 
Other non-cash amounts of Consolidated Funds0.1 — 0.5 
Purchases of investments(629.9)(276.7)(271.3)
Purchase of investment in Fortitude Re— — (79.6)
Proceeds from the sale of investments474.9 668.4 307.5 
Payments of contingent consideration(5.7)(48.0)— 
Changes in deferred taxes, net(73.2)508.4 134.5 
Change in due from affiliates and other receivables(82.5)(25.7)1.9 
Change in deposits and other(11.8)(12.5)(2.0)
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(14.3)105.7 (4.0)
Change in accrued compensation and benefits(135.4)239.0 210.1 
Change in due to affiliates1.7 0.2 (29.2)
Change in lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities(8.8)4.5 (9.8)
Change in deferred revenue4.5 35.1 16.2 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(379.3)1,791.0 (169.2)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of corporate treasury investments(69.6)— — 
Proceeds from corporate treasury investments50.0 — — 
Purchases of fixed assets, net(40.6)(41.4)(61.2)
Purchase of Abingworth, net of cash acquired(150.2)— — 
Purchase of CBAM intangibles and investments(618.4)— — 
Proceeds from sale of MRE, net of cash sold— 5.9 — 
Proceeds from sale of Brazil management entity, net of cash sold— 3.3 — 
Net cash used in investing activities(828.8)(32.2)(61.2)
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings under credit facilities— 70.0 294.1 
Repayments under credit facilities— (70.0)(329.9)
Issuance of 4.625% subordinated notes due 2061, net of financing costs— 484.1 — 
Repurchase of 3.875% senior notes due 2023— (259.9)— 
Proceeds from CLO borrowings, net of financing costs73.2 111.7 20.5 
Payments on CLO borrowings(16.7)(232.5)(3.8)
Net borrowings on loans payable of Consolidated Funds624.2 182.9 704.1 
Payments of contingent consideration— (0.1)(0.3)
Dividends to common stockholders(443.6)(355.8)(351.3)
Payment of deferred consideration for Carlyle Holdings units(68.8)(68.8)(68.8)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders391.2 216.2 210.0 
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders(216.8)(94.6)(77.8)
Common shares issued for performance allocations38.9 4.8 — 
Common shares repurchased(185.6)(161.8)(26.4)
Change in due to/from affiliates financing activities(81.2)(68.7)0.7 
Change in due to/from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds— — (0.8)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities114.8 (242.5)370.3 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes(20.3)(30.8)21.7 
(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1,113.6)1,485.5 161.6 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period2,475.1 989.6 828.0 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Supplemental cash disclosures
Cash paid for interest$91.5 $92.7 $80.1 
Cash paid for income taxes$402.1 $402.6 $35.4 
Supplemental non-cash disclosures
Issuance of common shares related to the acquisition of CBAM and Abingworth$219.5 $— $— 
Tax effects from the conversion to a Corporation recorded in equity$— $— $40.1 
Net asset impact of deconsolidation of Consolidated Funds$(47.7)$(34.4)$(253.6)
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 $987.6 
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 2.0 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds$209.0 $147.8 $148.6 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities     
Net income$1,007.4
 $15.3
 $400.1
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment41.3
 72.0
 322.8
Equity-based compensation320.3
 334.6
 378.0
Excess tax benefits related to equity-based compensation
 
 (4.0)
Non-cash performance fees(626.8) 199.6
 455.1
Other non-cash amounts(74.6) (41.7) 12.7
Consolidated Funds related:     
Realized/unrealized gain on investments of Consolidated Funds(27.0) (51.7) (458.7)
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss from loans payable of Consolidated Funds(61.4) 40.5
 (436.5)
Purchases of investments by Consolidated Funds(2,875.0) (2,739.4) (10,472.1)
Proceeds from sale and settlements of investments by Consolidated Funds2,649.3
 1,282.9
 11,653.6
Non-cash interest (income) loss, net(5.3) (5.5) 3.3
Change in cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds383.9
 513.7
 1,281.8
Change in other receivables held at Consolidated Funds(16.7) 1.1
 534.6
Change in other liabilities held at Consolidated Funds(266.1) 268.9
 48.0
Other non-cash amounts of Consolidated Funds
 (17.5) 
Investment income(227.1) (154.6) (0.5)
Purchases of investments(888.5) (368.2) (91.9)
Proceeds from the sale of investments467.5
 299.5
 313.0
Payments of contingent consideration(22.6) (82.6) (17.8)
Deconsolidation of Claren Road (see Note 9)(23.3) 
 
Deconsolidation of Urbplan (see Note 15)14.0
 
 
Deconsolidation of ESG
 (34.5) 
Changes in deferred taxes, net93.4
 (4.4) (31.4)
Change in due from affiliates and other receivables0.3
 (10.9) (1.4)
Change in receivables and inventory of a real estate VIE(14.5) 29.0
 (57.5)
Change in deposits and other(2.0) 5.1
 (10.8)
Change in other assets of a real estate VIE1.6
 41.2
 (17.4)
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities50.5
 66.6
 62.5
Change in accrued compensation and benefits(13.7) 6.5
 (35.3)
Change in due to affiliates35.7
 (19.3) 21.0
Change in other liabilities of a real estate VIE47.9
 34.3
 101.6
Change in deferred revenue24.4
 18.9
 (50.0)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(7.1) (300.6) 3,902.8
Cash flows from investing activities     
Change in restricted cash(15.5) 5.3
 40.8
Purchases of fixed assets, net(34.0) (25.4) (62.3)
Net cash used in investing activities(49.5) (20.1) (21.5)
Cash flows from financing activities     
Borrowings under credit facility250.0
 
 
Repayments under credit facility(250.0) 
 
Proceeds from debt obligations265.6
 20.6
 
Payments on debt obligations(21.7) (9.0) 
Net payments on loans payable of a real estate VIE(14.3) (34.5) (65.3)
Net borrowings on loans payable of Consolidated Funds147.2
 594.2
 734.3
Payments of contingent consideration(0.6) (3.3) (8.1)
Distributions to common unitholders(118.1) (140.9) (251.0)
Distributions to preferred unitholders(6.0) 
 
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders in Carlyle Holdings(295.6) (422.6) (848.5)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units, net of offering costs
 
 209.9
Proceeds from issuance of preferred units, net of offering costs and expenses387.5
 
 
Excess tax benefits related to equity-based compensation
 
 4.0
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders119.2
 113.0
 2,376.6
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders(118.0) (109.4) (5,267.0)
Acquisition of non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings
 
 (209.9)
Common units repurchased(0.2) (58.9) 
Change in due to/from affiliates financing activities(26.4) 66.1
 (62.7)
Change in due to/from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds
 
 (623.5)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities318.6
 15.3
 (4,011.2)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes67.2
 (15.2) (120.6)
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents329.2
 (320.6) (250.5)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period670.9
 991.5
 1,242.0
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$1,000.1
 $670.9
 $991.5
Supplemental cash disclosures     
Cash paid for interest$59.5
 $59.0
 $56.0
Cash paid for income taxes$24.8
 $35.1
 $41.6
Supplemental non-cash disclosures     
Increase in partners’ capital related to reallocation of ownership interest in Carlyle Holdings$24.8
 $13.6
 $21.9
Initial consolidation of Consolidated Funds$
 $
 $63.8
Net asset impact of deconsolidation of Consolidated Funds$
 $(7,170.2) $
Non-cash contributions from non-controlling interest holders$
 $6.3
 $
Tax effect from acquisition of Carlyle Holdings partnership units:     
Deferred tax asset$38.7
 $3.0
 $59.6
Deferred tax liability$
 $
 $2.6
Tax receivable agreement liability$30.7
 $2.6
 $51.5
Total partners’ capital$8.0
 $0.4
 $5.5


See accompanying notes.

178
189


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
The    Carlyle Group L.P., together with its consolidated subsidiaries is one of the world’s largest global alternative asset managementinvestment firms that originates, structuresdeploys private capital across its business through three reportable segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and acts as lead equity investor in management-led buyouts, strategic minority equity investments, equity private placements, consolidations and buildups,Global Investment Solutions (see Note 17). In the Global Private Equity segment, Carlyle advises buyout, growth, capital financings, real estate, opportunities, bank loans, high-yield debt, distressedinfrastructure and natural resources funds. The primary areas of focus for the Global Credit segment are liquid credit, illiquid credit, real assets mezzanine debtcredit, and other investment opportunities.credit such as insurance solutions, loan syndication and capital markets. The Carlyle Group L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 18, 2011, which is managed and operated by its general partner, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., which is in turn wholly-owned and controlled by Carlyle’s founders and other senior Carlyle professionals. Except as otherwise indicated by the context, references to the “Partnership” or “Carlyle” refer to The Carlyle Group L.P., together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
CarlyleGlobal Investment Solutions segment provides investment management services to,opportunities and has transactions with, various private equity funds, real estate funds, private credit funds, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”),resources for investors and other investment products sponsored by the Partnership for the investmentclients through secondary purchases and financing of client assets in the normal course of business.existing portfolios, managed co-investment programs and primary fund investments. Carlyle typically serves as the general partner, investment manager or collateral manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of these products. Carlyle operates its business through four reportable segments: Corporate Private Equity, Real Assets, Global Credit (formerly known as Global Market Strategies) and Investment Solutions (see Note 16).
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the PartnershipCompany and its consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, certain Carlyle-affiliated funds, related co-investment entities and certain CLOs managed by the PartnershipCompany (collectively the “Consolidated Funds”) and a real estate development company have been consolidated in the accompanying financial statements pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), as described in Note 2. The accounts of the real estate development company were deconsolidated during 2017 (see Note 15).3. The consolidation of the Consolidated Funds generally has a gross-up effect on assets, liabilities and cash flows, and generally has no effect on the net income attributable to the Partnership.Company. The economic ownership interests of the other investors in the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (see Note 2)3).

2. Recent Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company completed several transactions as outlined below.
Acquisition of Abingworth LLP (See Note 4)
On August 1, 2022, the Company acquired Abingworth LLP (“Abingworth”), a life sciences investment firm for a base purchase price of $186.2 million, of which $25.0 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock. Consideration for Abingworth also includes up to $130 million in future incentive payments on the achievement of certain performance targets. The acquisition includes the rights to 15% of performance allocations generated by Abingworth’s two most recent active investment funds, Abingworth Bioventures 8 LP and Abingworth Clinical Co-Development Fund 2 LP.
Fortitude Capital Raise and Strategic Advisory Services Agreement (See Note 6)
In March 2022, the Company raised $2.0 billion in third-party equity capital from certain investors in Carlyle FRL and T&D and committed $100 million from the Company to Carlyle FRL for additional equity capital in Fortitude. In May 2022, Fortitude called $1.1 billion of the capital raise, with the remaining capital expected to be called in 2023. In connection with the capital raise and subsequent funding, the Company’s indirect ownership of Fortitude decreased from 19.9% to 13.5% and is expected to further decrease to 10.5% upon funding the remainder of the capital raise.
On April 1, 2022, the Company entered into a new strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude through a newly-formed investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C. (“CISM”). Under the agreement, CISM provides Fortitude with certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability.
Acquisition of CLO Management Contracts from CBAM Partners LLC (See Note 4)
On March 21, 2022, the Company acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”) for a purchase price of $812.9 million, of which $194.5 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the acquisition of the CLO management contracts, the Company acquired CLO senior and subordinated notes of $175.9 million, a portion of which is financed through term loans and other financing arrangements.
Acquisition of iStar Triple Net Lease Portfolio (See Note 6)
In March 2022, Carlyle Net Leasing Income, L.P., a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund, acquired a diversified portfolio of triple net leases for an enterprise value of $3 billion, which was funded using $2 billion in debt and $1 billion in equity. The investment fund is not consolidated by the Company and the debt is non-recourse to the Company. Carlyle, as general partner of the investment fund, contributed $200 million as a minority interest balance sheet investment, which is included in the Company’s Global Credit principal equity method investments.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The PartnershipCompany consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). On January 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted ASU 2015-2, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which provides a revised consolidation model for all reporting entities to use in evaluating whether to consolidate certain types of legal entities. As a result, the Partnership deconsolidated the majority of the Partnership's Consolidated Funds on January 1, 2016. Upon adoption, the Partnership deconsolidated approximately $23.2 billion in assets and approximately $16.1 billion in liabilities, and, using the modified retrospective method, recorded a $4.3 billion cumulative effect adjustment to partners' capital and $2.8 billion to redeemable non-controlling interests in consolidated entities. The adoption of the new consolidation guidance had no impact on net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings or to net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Prior period results were not restated upon adoption.
The PartnershipCompany evaluates (1) whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, (2) whether the entity is a VIE, and (3) whether the Partnership'sCompany’s involvement would make it the primary beneficiary. In evaluating whether the PartnershipCompany holds a variable interest, fees (including management fees, incentive fees and performance fees)allocations) that are customary and commensurate with the level of services provided, and where the PartnershipCompany does not hold other economic interests in the entity that would absorb more than an insignificant amount of the expected losses or returns of the entity, are not considered variable interests. The PartnershipCompany considers all economic interests, including indirect interests, to determine if a fee is considered a variable interest. For the funds the Partnership deconsolidated on January 1, 2016, the Partnership's fee arrangements were not considered to be variable interests.
For those entities where the PartnershipCompany holds a variable interest, the PartnershipCompany determines whether each of these entities qualifies as a VIE and, if so, whether or not the PartnershipCompany is the primary beneficiary. The assessment of whether the entity is a VIE is generally performed qualitatively, which requires judgment. These judgments include: (a) determining

190


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


whether the equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) evaluating whether the equity holders, as a group, can make decisions that have a significant effect on the economic performance of the entity, (c) determining whether two or more parties'parties’ equity interests should be aggregated, and (d) determining whether the equity investors have proportionate voting rights to their obligations to absorb losses or rights to receive returns from an entity.
For entities that are determined to be VIEs, the PartnershipCompany consolidates those entities where it has concluded it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined as the variable interest holder with (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In evaluating whether the PartnershipCompany is the primary beneficiary, the PartnershipCompany evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by the Partnership.Company.
As of December 31, 2017,2022, assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the consolidated balance sheets were $5.0$7.2 billion and $4.8$6.2 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the consolidated balance sheets were $6.9 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively. Except to the extent of the consolidated assets of the VIEs, the holders of the consolidated VIEs’ liabilities generally do not have recourse to the Partnership.Company.
Substantially all of ourThe Company’s Consolidated Funds are primarily CLOs, which are VIEs that issue loans payable that are backed by diversified collateral asset portfolios consisting primarily of loans or structured debt. In exchange for managing the collateral for the CLOs, the PartnershipCompany earns investment management fees, including in some cases subordinated management fees and contingent incentive fees. In cases where the PartnershipCompany consolidates the CLOs (primarily because of a retained interest that is significant to the CLO), those management fees and contingent incentive fees have been eliminated as intercompany transactions. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the PartnershipCompany held $220.6$110.6 million of investments in these CLOs which represents its maximum risk of loss. The Partnership’sCompany’s investments in these CLOs are generally subordinated to other interests in the entities and entitle the PartnershipCompany to receive a pro rata portion of the residual cash flows, if any, from the entities. Investors in the CLOs have no recourse against the PartnershipCompany for any losses sustained in the CLO structure. The Company’s Consolidated Funds also include certain investment funds in our Global Private Equity segment that are actively fundraising and are accounted for as consolidated VIEs due to the Company providing financing to bridge investment purchases. As of December 31, 2022, the Company held $374.6 million of notes receivable, including accrued interest, from these investment funds which represents its maximum risk of loss.
179

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Entities that do not qualify as VIEs are generally assessed for consolidation as voting interest entities. Under the voting interest entity model, the PartnershipCompany consolidates those entities it controls through a majority voting interest.
All significant inter-entity transactions and balances of entities consolidated have been eliminated.


Investments in Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The PartnershipCompany holds variable interests in certain VIEs that are not consolidated because the PartnershipCompany is not the primary beneficiary, including its investments in certain CLOs and certain AlpInvest vehicles, as well as its strategic investment in NGP Management Company, L.L.C. (“NGP Management” and, together with its affiliates, “NGP”). Refer to Note 56 for information on the strategic investment in NGP. The Partnership’sCompany’s involvement with such entities is in the form of direct or indirect equity interests and fee arrangements. The maximum exposure to loss represents the loss of assets recognized by the PartnershipCompany relating to its variable interests in these unconsolidated entities. The assets recognized in the Partnership’sCompany’s consolidated balance sheets related to the Partnership’sCompany’s variable interests in these non-consolidated VIEs andwere as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Investments$1,124.0 $901.9 
Accrued performance allocations406.0 368.7 
Management fee receivables49.6 27.2 
Total$1,579.6 $1,297.8 
These amounts represent the Partnership’sCompany’s maximum exposure to loss relatingrelated to the unconsolidated VIEs were as follows:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Investments$975.3
 $664.2
Due from affiliates, net0.1
 1.8
Maximum Exposure to Loss$975.4
 $666.0
Additionally, as of December 31, 2017, the Partnership had $62.0 million2022 and $11.7 million recognized in the consolidated balance sheet related to performance fee and management fee arrangements, respectively, related to the unconsolidated VIEs.2021.

191


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Basis of Accounting
The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management has determined that the Partnership’sCompany’s Funds are investment companies under U.S. GAAP for the purposes of financial reporting. U.S. GAAP for an investment company requires investments to be recorded at estimated fair value and the unrealized gains and/or losses in an investment’s fair value are recognized on a current basis in the statements of operations. Additionally, the Funds do not consolidate their majority-owned and controlled investments (the “Portfolio Companies”). In the preparation of these consolidated financial statements, the PartnershipCompany has retained the specialized accounting for the Funds.


All of the investments held and notes issued by the Consolidated Funds are presented at their estimated fair values in the Partnership’sCompany’s consolidated balance sheets. Interest and other income of the Consolidated Funds, as well as interest expense and other expenses of the Consolidated Funds, and net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds are included in the Partnership’sCompany’s consolidated statements of operations. Prior to January 1, 2016, the excess of the CLO assets over the CLO liabilities upon consolidation was reflected in the Partnership’s consolidated balance sheets as partners’ capital appropriated for Consolidated Funds. Net income attributable to the investors in the CLOs was included in net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the consolidated statements of operations and partners’ capital appropriated for Consolidated Funds in the consolidated balance sheets.

On January 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted ASU 2014-13, Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity. ASU 2014-13 relates to reporting entities that elect to measure all eligible financial assets and financial liabilities of a consolidated collateralized financing entity at fair value. The Partnership's consolidated CLOs are consolidated collateralized financing entities for which the Partnership has measured financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. ASU 2014-13 provides the option for a reporting entity to initially measure both the financial assets and financial liabilities using the fair value of either the financial assets or financial liabilities, whichever is more observable.  In adopting this guidance on January 1, 2016, the Partnership applied the modified retrospective method by recording a cumulative effect adjustment to appropriated partners' capital of $2.0 million as of January 1, 2016. As a result of applying this adoption method, prior periods have not been impacted. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on net income attributable to Carlyle Holdings or to net income attributable to the Partnership.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on historical experiences and other factors, including expectations of future events that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the Partnership’sCompany’s accounting policies. Assumptions and estimates regarding the valuation of investments and their resulting impact on performance allocations and incentive fees involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and these assumptions and estimates may be significant to the consolidated financial statements and the resulting impact on performance allocations and incentive fees. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.

    Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting, under which the purchase price of the acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration obligations that are elements of consideration transferred are
180

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
recognized as of the acquisition date as part of the fair value transferred in exchange for the acquired business. Acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.

Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Revenue is recognized when the Company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 includes a five-step framework that requires an entity to: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, which includes assessing the collectability of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services transferred to the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The Company accounts for performance allocations that represent a performance-based capital allocation from fund limited partners to the Company (commonly known as “carried interest”), as earnings from financial assets within the scope of ASC 323, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures, and therefore are not in the scope of ASC 606. In accordance with ASC 323, the Company records equity method income (losses) as a component of investment income based on the change in its proportionate claim on net assets of the investment fund, including performance allocations, assuming the investment fund was liquidated as of each reporting date pursuant to each fund’s governing agreements. See Note 6 for additional information on the components of investments and investment income. Performance fees that do not meet the definition of performance-based capital allocations are in the scope of ASC 606 and are included in incentive fees in the consolidated statements of operations. The calculation of unrealized performance revenues utilizes investment valuations of the funds’ underlying investments, which are derived using the policies, methodologies and templates prepared by the Company’s valuation group, as described in Note 5, Fair Value Measurement.
While the determination of who is the customer in a contractual arrangement will be made on a contract-by-contract basis, the customer will generally be the investment fund for the Company’s significant management and advisory contracts. The customer determination impacts the Company’s analysis of the accounting for contract costs.
Fund Management Fees
The PartnershipCompany provides management services to funds in which it holds a general partner interest or to funds or certain portfolio companies with which it has aan investment advisory or investment management agreement. The Company considers the performance obligations in its contracts with its funds to be the promise to provide (or to arrange for third parties to provide) investment management services related to the management, policies and operations of the funds.

As it relates to the Company’s performance obligation to provide investment management services, the Company typically satisfies this performance obligation over time as the services are rendered, since the funds simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided as the Company performs the service. The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised services to the funds. Management fees earned from each investment management contract over the contract life represent variable consideration because the consideration the Company is entitled to varies based on fluctuations in the basis for the management fee, for example fund net asset value (“NAV”) or assets under management (“AUM”). Given that the management fee basis is susceptible to market factors outside of the Company’s influence, management fees are constrained and, therefore, estimates of future period management fees are generally not included in the transaction price. Revenue recognized for the investment management services provided is generally the amount determined at the end of the period because that is when the uncertainty for that period is resolved.

For closed-end carry funds in the CorporateGlobal Private Equity Real Assets and Global Credit segments, management fees generally range from 1.0% to 2.0% of commitments during the fund'sfund’s investment period based on limited partners'partners’ capital commitments to the funds. Following the expiration or termination of the investment period, management fees generally are based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and the rate charged may also be reduced to between 0.6% and 2.0%. For certainreduced. These terms may vary for separately managed accounts, and longer-dated carry funds, with expected terms greater than ten years, management fees generally range from 0.2% to 1.0% based on contributions for unrealized investments or the current value of the investment.and other closed-end funds. The PartnershipCompany will receive management fees during a specified period of time, which is generally ten years from the initial closing date, or, in some instances, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances or later if extended for successive one year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Depending upon the contracted terms of investment advisory or investment management and related agreements, these fees are generally

192


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


called semi-annually in advance and are recognized as earned
181

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
over the subsequent six month period. For certain longer-dated carry funds and certain other closed-end funds, management fees are called quarterly over the life of the funds.

Within the Global Credit segment, for CLOs and other structured products, management fees generally range from 0.3%0.4% to 0.6%0.5% based on the total par amount of assets or the aggregate principal amount of the notes in the CLO and are due quarterly or semi-annuallyin arrears based on the terms and recognized over the respective period. Management fees for the CLOs and other structured products are governed by indentures and collateral management agreements. The PartnershipCompany will receive management fees for the CLOs until redemption of the securities issued by the CLOs, which is generally five to ten years after issuance. Management fees for the business development companies are due quarterly in arrears at annual rates that range from 0.25%1.0% of capital under management to 1.5% of gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents. Management fees for the Interval Fund are due monthly in arrears at the annual rate of 1.0% of the month-end value of the Interval Fund’s net assets. Carlyle Aviation Partners’ funds have varying management fee arrangements depending on the strategy of the particular fund. Under the
strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, the Company earns a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s
general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability and which is due
quarterly in arrears.

Management fees for the Partnership's private equity and real estateCompany’s carry fund vehicles in the Global Investment Solutions segment generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% onof the vehicle’s capital commitments during the commitment fee period of the relevant fund or the weighted-average investment period of the underlying funds.fund. Following the expiration of the commitment fee period, or weighted-average investment period of such funds, the management fees generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% on (i) the net invested capital; (ii) the lower of cost or fairnet asset value of the capital invested, (ii)or (iii) the net asset value for unrealized investments, or (iii) the contributions for unrealized investments; however, certain separately managed accounts earn management fees at all times on contributions for unrealized investments or on the initial commitment amount.investments. Management fees for the Global Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles are generally due quarterly in advance and recognized over the related quarter.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, management fee receivables, net of allowances for credit losses, were $236.9 million and $164.5 million, respectively, and are included in due from affiliates and other receivables, net, in the consolidated balance sheets.

The PartnershipCompany also provides transaction advisory and portfolio advisory services to the portfolio companies, and where covered by separate contractual agreements, recognizes fees for these services when the serviceperformance obligation has been providedsatisfied and collection is reasonably assured. The Company also recognizes underwriting fees from the Company’s loan syndication and capital markets business, Carlyle Global Capital Markets. Fund management fees includes transaction and portfolio advisory fees, as well as capital markets fees, of $43.6$106.2 million, $47.8$90.7 million and $25.2$50.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, net of any offsets as defined in the respective partnership agreements.

Fund management fees exclude the reimbursement of any partnership expenses paid by the PartnershipCompany on behalf of the Carlyle funds pursuant to the limited partnership agreements, including amounts related to the pursuit of actual, proposed, or unconsummated investments, professional fees, expenses associated with the acquisition, holding and disposition of investments, and other fund administrative expenses. For the professional fees that the Company arranges for the investment funds, the Company concluded that the nature of its promise is to arrange for the services to be provided and it does not control the services provided by third parties before they are transferred to the customer. Therefore, the Company concluded it is acting in the capacity of an agent. Accordingly, the reimbursement for these professional fees paid on behalf of the investment funds is presented on a net basis in general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company also incurs certain costs, primarily employee travel and entertainment costs, employee compensation and systems costs, for which it receives reimbursement from the investment funds in connection with its performance obligation to provide investment and management services. For reimbursable travel, compensation and systems costs, the Company concluded it controls the services provided by its employees and the resources used to develop applicable systems before they are transferred to the customer and therefore is a principal. Accordingly, the reimbursement for these costs incurred by the Company to manage the fund limited partnerships are presented on a gross basis in interest and other income in the consolidated statements of operations and the expense in general, administrative and other expenses or cash-based compensation and benefits expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Performance
Incentive Fees
PerformanceIn connection with management contracts from certain of its Global Credit funds, the Company is also entitled to receive performance-based incentive fees consist principallywhen the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, incentive fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been
182

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
achieved. Incentive fees are variable consideration because they are contingent upon the investment vehicle achieving stipulated investment return hurdles. Investment returns are highly susceptible to market factors outside of the performance-based capitalCompany’s influence. Accordingly, incentive fees are constrained until all uncertainty is resolved. Estimates of future period incentive fees are generally not included in the transaction price because these estimates are constrained. The transaction price for incentive fees is generally the amount determined at the end of each accounting period to which they relate because that is when the uncertainty for that period is resolved, as these fees are not subject to clawback.

Investment Income (Loss), including Performance Allocations
Investment income (loss) represents the unrealized and realized gains and losses resulting from the Company’s equity method investments, including any associated general partner performance allocations, and other principal investments, including CLOs.

General partner performance allocations consist of the allocation of profits from fund limited partnerscertain of the funds to which the PartnershipCompany is entitled (commonly known as "carried interest")carried interest).
For closed-end carry funds in the CorporateGlobal Private Equity Real Assets and Global Credit segments, the PartnershipCompany is generally entitled to a 20% allocation (or 10% to 20% on certain longer-dated carry funds, certain credit funds, and external co-investment vehicles, or approximately 2% to 10%12.5% for most of the recentGlobal Investment Solutions segment carry fund vehicles) of the net realized income or gain as a carried interest after returning the invested capital, the allocation of preferred returns of generally 7% to 9% (or 4% to 7% for certain longer-dated carry funds) and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement). These terms may vary on longer-dated funds, certain credit funds, and external co-investment vehicles. Carried interest is recognized upon appreciation of the funds’ investment values above certain return hurdles set forth in each respective partnership agreement. The PartnershipCompany recognizes revenues attributable to performance feesallocations based upon the amount that would be due pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were terminated at that date. Accordingly, the amount recognized as investment income for performance feesallocations reflects the Partnership’sCompany’s share of the gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. Because of the inherent uncertainty, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is reasonably possible that the difference could be material.
Carried interest is ultimately realized when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of, (ii) certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed, (iii) the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return and (iv) the PartnershipCompany has decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. Realized carried interest may be required to be returned by the PartnershipCompany in future periods if the funds’fund’s investment values decline below certain levels. When the fair value of a fund’s investments remains constant or falls below certain return hurdles, previously recognized performance feesallocations are reversed. In all cases, each fund is considered separately in this regard, and for a given fund, performance feesallocations can never be negative over the life of a fund. If upon a hypothetical liquidation of a fund’s investments at their then current fair values, previously recognized and distributed carried interest would be required to be returned, a liability is established for the potential giveback obligation. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the PartnershipCompany has recognized $66.8accrued $40.9 million and $160.8$30.2 million, respectively, for giveback obligations.

193


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The Partnership is also entitled to receive performance fees pursuant to management contracts from certain of its Global Credit funds when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, performance fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved, and are included in performance fees in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Investment Income (Loss)
Investment income (loss) represents the unrealized and realized gains and losses resulting from the Partnership’s equity method investments and other principal investments, including CLOs. Equity methodPrincipal investment income (loss) includes the related amortization of the basis difference between the Partnership’s carrying value of its investment and the Partnership’s share of underlying net assets of the investee, as well as the compensation expense associated with compensatory arrangements provided by the Partnership to employees of its equity method investee, as it relates to its investment in NGP (see Note 5). Investment income (loss) is realized when the PartnershipCompany redeems all or a portion of its investment or when the PartnershipCompany receives or is due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from the Company’s proportionate share of the investee’s unrealized earnings, including changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of unrealized gain (loss) at the time an investment is realized. Principal investment income (loss) also includes the Company’s allocation of earnings from its investment in Fortitude through June 2, 2020 (see Note 6). As it relates to the Company’s investments in NGP (see Note 6), principal investment income includes the related amortization of the basis difference between the Company’s carrying value of its investment and the Company’s share of underlying net assets of the investee, as well as the compensation expense associated with compensatory arrangements provided by the Company to employees of its equity method investee.

Interest Income
Interest income is recognized when earned. For debt securities representing non-investment grade beneficial interests in securitizations, the effective yield is determined based on the estimated cash flows of the security. Changes in the effective yield of these securities due to changes in estimated cash flows are recognized on a prospective basis as adjustments to interest income in future periods. Interest income earned by the PartnershipCompany is included in interest and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Interest income of the Consolidated Funds was $167.3$282.3 million, $140.4$231.3 million and $873.1
183

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
$211.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, and is included in interest and other income of Consolidated Funds in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Credit Losses

Under ASU 2016-13, the Company is required to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company assesses the collection risk characteristics of the outstanding amounts in its due from affiliates balance into the following pools of receivables:
Reimbursable fund expenses receivables,
Management fee receivables,
Incentive fee receivables,
Transaction fee receivables,
Portfolio fee receivables, and
Notes receivable.
The Company generally utilizes either historical credit loss information or discounted cash flows to calculate expected credit losses for each pool. The Company’s receivables are predominantly with its investment funds, which have low risk of credit loss based on the Company’s historical experience. Historical credit loss data may be adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including the Company’s expectation of near-term realization based on the liquidity of the affiliated investment funds.
Compensation and Benefits
BaseCash-based Compensation and BenefitsBaseCash-based compensation and benefits includes salaries, bonuses (discretionary awards and guaranteed amounts), performance payment arrangements and benefits paid and payable to Carlyle employees. Bonuses are accrued over the service period to which they relate.
Equity-Based Compensation – Compensation expense relating to the issuance of equity-based awards to Carlyle employees is measured at fair value on the grant date. The compensation expense for awards that vest over a future service period is recognized over the relevant service period on a straight-line basis. The compensation expense for awards that do not require future service is recognized immediately. Cash settled equity-based awards are classified as liabilities and are re-measured at the end of each reporting period. The compensation expense for awards that contain performance conditions is recognized when it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved; in certain instances, such compensation expense may be recognized prior to the grant date of the award. The compensation expense for awards that contain market conditions is based on a grant-date fair value that factors in the probability that the market conditions will be achieved and is recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis.
Equity-based awards issued to non-employees are generally recognized as general, administrative and other expenses, except to the extent they are recognized as part of ourthe Company’s equity method earnings because they are issued to employees of our equity method investees.
The grant-date fair value of equity-based awards granted to Carlyle’s non-employee directors is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The cost of services received in exchange for an equity-based award issued to non-employees who are not directors is measured at each vesting date, and is not measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award unless the award is vested at the grant date. Equity-based awards that require the satisfaction of future service criteria are recognized over the relevant service period based on the fair value of the award on each reporting date and adjusted for the actual fair value of the award at each vesting date. Accordingly, the measured value of the award will not be finalized until the vesting date.
On January 1, 2017, the Partnership adopted ASU 2016-9, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718). In accordance with ASU 2016-9, the Partnership elected to recognizeCompany recognizes equity-based award forfeitures in the period they occur as a reversal of previously recognized compensation expense. The reduction in compensation expense is determined based on the specific awards forfeited during that period. Furthermore, the Partnership is required to recognize prospectivelyCompany recognizes all excess tax benefits and deficiencies as income tax benefit or expense in the statementconsolidated statements of operations.

194


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Performance Allocations and Incentive Fee Related Compensation – A portion of the performance allocations and incentive fees earned is due to employees and advisors of the Partnership.Company. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the recognition of the related performance allocations and incentive fee revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Accordingly, upon a reversal of performance allocations or incentive fee revenue, the related compensation expense, if any, is also reversed. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the PartnershipCompany had recorded a liability of $1.9$3.6 billion and $1.3$4.1 billion, respectively, related to the portion of accrued performance allocations and incentive fees due to employees and advisors, respectively, which was included in accrued compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.balance sheets.
184

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In October 2021, the Company commenced a program under which, at the Company’s discretion, up to 20% of the realized performance allocation related compensation over a threshold amount may be distributed in fully vested newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares issued under the program are accounted for as performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation and do not result in incremental compensation expense. The Company has determined to pause the issuance of shares pursuant to this program.
Income Taxes
CertainThe Carlyle Group Inc. is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thus is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes. Prior to the Conversion, The Carlyle Group L.P. was generally organized as a series of pass-through entities and therefore generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes, with the exception of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Partnership and the Carlyle Holdings partnerships arewhich were subject to federal, state, local and foreign corporate income taxes at the entity level and the related tax provision attributable to the Partnership’s share of this income is reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Based on applicable federal, foreign, state and local tax laws, the Partnership records a provision for income taxes for certain entities.level. Tax positions taken by the PartnershipCompany are subject to periodic audit by U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxing authorities.
The PartnershipCompany accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the period in which the difference is expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period of the change in the provision for income taxes. For instance, in December 2017, new corporate federal income tax rates were enacted, which impacted the Partnership's deferred tax assets and liabilities. See Note 11 for more information on the newly enacted corporate federal income tax rates. Further, deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected realization of available net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is recorded on the Partnership’sCompany’s gross deferred tax assets when it is more“more likely than notnot” that such asset will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of the Partnership’sCompany’s deferred tax assets, all evidence, both positive and negative, is evaluated. Items considered in this analysis include the ability to carry back losses, the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and expectations of future earnings. The Company accounts for the valuation allowance assessment on its deferred tax assets and without regard to the Company’s potential future corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) status. Lastly, the Company accounts for the tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) as incurred and therefore has not recorded deferred taxes related to GILTI on its foreign subsidiaries.
 
Under U.S. GAAP for income taxes, the amount of tax benefit to be recognized is the amount of benefit that is more“more likely than notnot” to be sustained upon examination. The PartnershipCompany analyzes its tax filing positions in all of the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as for all open tax years in these jurisdictions. If, based on this analysis, the PartnershipCompany determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist, a liability is established, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. The PartnershipCompany recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in the provision for income taxes. If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax positions would be recorded as a reduction in the provision for income taxes.
Tax Receivable Agreement
Exchanges of Carlyle Holdings partnership units for the Partnership’s common units that are executed by the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships result in transfers of and increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Carlyle Holdings, primarily attributable to a portion of the goodwill inherent in the business. These transfers and increases in tax basis will increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization and therefore reduce the amount of tax that certain of the Partnership’s subsidiaries, including Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc., which are referred to as the “corporate taxpayers,” would otherwise be required to pay in the future. This increase in tax basis may also decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent tax basis is allocated to those capital assets. The Partnership has entered into a tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships whereby the corporate taxpayers have agreed to pay to the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships involved in any exchange transaction 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or foreign or franchise tax that the corporate taxpayers realize as a result of these increases in tax basis and, in limited cases, transfers or prior increases in tax basis. The corporate taxpayers expect to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash tax savings, if any, in income tax they realize. Payments under the tax receivable agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that the Partnership will determine. The corporate taxpayers will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement if a tax basis increase is successfully challenged by the Internal Revenue Service.

195


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The Partnership records an increase in deferred tax assets for the estimated income tax effects of the increases in tax basis based on enacted federal and state tax rates at the date of the exchange. To the extent that the Partnership estimates that the corporate taxpayers will not realize the full benefit represented by the deferred tax asset, based on an analysis that will consider, among other things, its expectation of future earnings, the Partnership will reduce the deferred tax asset with a valuation allowance and will assess the probability that the related liability owed under the tax receivable agreement will be paid. The Partnership records 85% of the estimated realizable tax benefit (which is the recorded deferred tax asset less any recorded valuation allowance) as an increase to the liability due under the tax receivable agreement, which is included in due to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The remaining 15% of the estimated realizable tax benefit is initially recorded as an increase to the Partnership’s partners’ capital.
All of the effects to the deferred tax asset of changes in any of the Partnership’s estimates after the tax year of the exchange will be reflected in the provision for income taxes. Similarly, the effect of subsequent changes in the enacted tax rates will be reflected in the provision for income taxes.
Non-controlling InterestsRecent Accounting Pronouncements
Non-controlling interestsWe discuss recent accounting pronouncements in Note 3 to the consolidated entities represent the component of equityfinancial statements included in consolidated entities held by third-party investors. These interests are adjusted forthis Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary exposure to market risk is related to our role as general partner or investment advisor to our investment funds and the sensitivities to movements in the fair value of their investments, including the effect on management fees, incentive fees, performance allocations and principal investment income.
Although our investment funds share many common themes, each of our asset management asset classes runs its own investment and risk management processes, subject to our overall risk tolerance and philosophy. The investment process of our investment funds involves a comprehensive due diligence approach, including review of reputation of shareholders and management, company size and sensitivity of cash flow generation, business sector and competitive risks, portfolio fit, exit risks and other key factors highlighted by subscriptionsthe deal team. Key investment decisions are subject to approval by both the fund-level managing directors, as well as the investment committee, which is generally comprised of one or more of the three founding partners, one “sector” head, one or more advisors and redemptionssenior investment professionals associated with that particular fund. Once an investment in hedgea portfolio company has been made, our fund teams closely monitor the performance of the portfolio company, generally through frequent contact with management and the receipt of financial and management reports.
Effect on Fund Management Fees
Management fees will only be directly affected by short-term changes in market conditions to the extent they are based on NAV or represent permanent impairments of value. These management fees will be increased (or reduced) in direct proportion to the effect of changes in the market value of our investments in the related funds. In addition, the terms of the governing agreements with respect to certain of our carry funds which occur duringprovide that the management fee base will be reduced when the aggregate fair market value of a fund’s investments is below its cost. The proportion of our management fees that are based on NAV is dependent on the number and types of investment funds in existence and the current stage of each fund’s life cycle.
Effect on Performance Allocations
Performance allocations reflect revenue primarily from carried interest on our carry funds. In our discussion of “Key Financial Measures” and “Critical Accounting Policies,” we disclose that performance allocations are recognized upon appreciation of the valuation of our funds’ investments above certain return hurdles and are based upon the amount that would be due to Carlyle at each reporting period. Anydate as if the funds were liquidated at their then-current fair values. Changes in the fair value of the funds’ investments may materially impact performance allocations depending upon the respective funds’ performance to date as compared to its hurdle rate and the related carry waterfall.

The following table summarizes the incremental impact, including our Consolidated Funds, of a 10% change in ownershiptotal remaining fair value by segment as of December 31, 2022 on our performance allocations revenue:
10% Increase
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
10% Decrease
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,913.5 $(2,113.9)
Global Credit191.9 (112.3)
Global Investment Solutions255.6 (248.3)
Total$2,361.0 $(2,474.5)
169


The following table summarizes the incremental impact of a subsidiary while10% change in Level III remaining fair value by segment as of December 31, 2022 on our performance allocations revenue:
10% Increase
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
10% Decrease
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,828.4 $(2,006.7)
Global Credit186.6 (110.8)
Global Investment Solutions247.8 (241.4)
Total$2,262.8 $(2,358.9)
The effect of the controlling financial interestvariability in performance allocations revenue would be in part offset by performance allocation related compensation.
Effect on Assets Under Management
Generally, our Fee-earning assets under management are not affected by changes in valuation. However, total assets under management is retained is accounted forimpacted by valuation changes to net asset value. The table below shows the remaining fair value and the percentage amount classified as an equity transactionLevel III investments as defined within the fair value standards of U.S. GAAP:
Remaining Fair ValuePercentage Amount
Classified as Level
III Investments
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$123,673 95 %
Global Credit$132,924 75 %
Global Investment Solutions$43,521 97 %
Exchange Rate Risk
Our investment funds hold investments that are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies that may be affected by movements in the rate of exchange between the controllingU.S. dollar and non-controlling interests. Transaction costs incurrednon-U.S. dollar currencies. Non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and the consolidated statements of operations accounts are translated at rates of exchange in connectioneffect throughout the year. Additionally, a portion of our management fees are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. We estimate that as of December 31, 2022, if there was a 10% decline in the rate of exchange of all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, the impact on our consolidated results of operations for the year then ended would be as follows: (a) fund management fees would decrease by $49.5 million, (b) performance allocations would decrease by $72.0 million and (c) principal investment income would remain flat.
Interest Rate Risk
We have obligations under our CLO term loans that accrue interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes may therefore affect the amount of interest payments, future earnings and cash flows. The CLO term loans incur interest at EURIBOR plus an applicable rate. We do not have any interest rate swaps in place for these borrowings.

Based on our debt obligations payable as of December 31, 2022, we estimate that interest expense relating to variable rates would increase by approximately $4.2 million on an annual basis in the event interest rates were to increase by one percentage point.
Credit Risk
Certain of our investment funds hold derivative instruments that contain an element of risk in the event that the counterparties are unable to meet the terms of such agreements. We minimize our risk exposure by limiting the counterparties with suchwhich we enter into contracts to banks and investment banks who meet established credit and capital guidelines. We do not expect any counterparty to default on its obligations and therefore do not expect to incur any loss due to counterparty default.

170


ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of The Carlyle Group Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Carlyle Group Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in ownershipequity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)and our report dated February 9, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a subsidiarypublic accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

171


Measurement of principal equity method investments, including accrued performance allocations
Description of the matterAt December 31, 2022, the carrying value of the Company’s investments totaled approximately $10.8 billion and included principal equity method investments in sponsored unconsolidated funds (collectively, the “funds” or each, a “fund”) of approximately $3.7 billion and accrued performance allocations of approximately $7.1 billion. As discussed in Notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, a significant input to the measurement of the Company’s principal equity method investments in the funds, including accrued performance allocations, is management’s estimate of the fair value of the investments held by each fund. Management estimates the fair value of the funds’ investments, including investments in the equity of private operating companies, real estate properties and certain debt positions, by applying the methodologies outlined in Notes 3 and 6 and using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions.
 
Auditing management’s estimates of the fair value of the funds’ investments, valued using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions, was complex and highly judgmental because these investments exhibit higher estimation uncertainty.

How we addressed the matter in our auditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the funds’ investment valuation process. This included management's review controls over the assessment of the methodologies, significant inputs and assumptions included in the fair value estimates, as well as management’s review around the completeness, accuracy and reasonableness of the data used in these estimates.
 
Our audit procedures related to valuations using significant unobservable inputs included, among others, assessing whether the valuation methodologies used were appropriate and testing the mathematical accuracy of the valuation models.

For a sample of investments, we obtained management’s valuation models and compared objective inputs used in the models to agreements or underlying source documents provided by the Company. We also assessed the appropriateness of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the fair value estimates by comparing them to underlying support or available market data and evaluating the appropriateness of any significant adjustments. Our procedures varied based on the nature of the fund investment selected for testing.

For example, for certain investments in the equity of private operating companies, we assessed the appropriateness of management’s determination of public market comparable companies and similar transactions. For these selected investments, we also evaluated significant adjustments applied to the selected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiple or discount rate derived from the comparable companies by considering investee specific and relevant market information.

For a sample of investments that were sold during the year, we performed procedures to assess the historical reasonableness of management’s estimates. We also reviewed management’s assessment of subsequent events and transactions and considered whether they corroborated or contradicted the year-end estimates.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
Tysons, VA

February 9, 2023


172


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of The Carlyle Group Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited The Carlyle Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The Carlyle Group Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and our report dated February 9, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as a direct chargenecessary to partners’ capital.
Non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings relate to the ownership interestspermit preparation of the other limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. The Partnership, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, is the sole general partner of Carlyle Holdings.  Accordingly, the Partnership consolidates Carlyle Holdings into its consolidated financial statements and the other ownership interests in Carlyle Holdings are reflected as non-controlling interests in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements. Any change to the Partnership’s ownership interest in Carlyle Holdings while it retains the controlling financial interest in Carlyle Holdings is accounted for as a transaction within partners’ capital as a reallocation of ownership interests in Carlyle Holdings.
Earnings Per Common Unit
The Partnership computes earnings per common unit in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”). Basic earnings per common unit is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the common unitsgenerally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership by the weighted-average numbercompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of common units outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common unit reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. Net income (loss) attributable to the common units excludes net income (loss)management and dividends attributable to any participating securities under the two-class method of ASC 260.

Investments
Investments include (i) the Partnership’s ownership interests (typically general partner interests) in the Funds, (ii) strategic investments made by the Partnership (both of which are accounted for as equity method investments), (iii) the investments held by the Consolidated Funds (which are presented at fair value in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements), and (iv) certain credit-oriented investments, including investments in the CLOs (which are accounted for as trading securities).
The valuation procedures utilized for investmentsdirectors of the Funds vary dependingcompany; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the naturefinancial statements.
Because of the investment. The fair valueits inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of investments in publicly-traded securities is based on the closing priceany evaluation of the security with adjustmentseffectiveness to reflect appropriate discounts if the securitiesfuture periods are subject to restrictions.the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tysons, VA
February 9, 2023
173


The fair valueCarlyle Group Inc.



Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions)
 December 31,
 20222021
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds209.0 147.8 
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 
Corporate treasury investments20.0 — 
Investments, including accrued performance allocations of $7,117.7 and $8,133.0 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively10,767.9 10,832.0 
Investments of Consolidated Funds6,894.4 6,661.0 
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net579.4 379.6 
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net101.9 138.8 
Fixed assets, net139.9 143.9 
Lease right-of-use assets, net337.0 361.1 
Deposits and other78.4 61.7 
Intangible assets, net897.8 34.9 
Deferred tax assets15.8 14.5 
Total assets$21,403.0 $21,250.4 
Liabilities and equity
Debt obligations$2,271.7 $2,071.6 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds5,905.2 5,890.0 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities369.2 379.7 
Accrued compensation and benefits4,320.9 4,955.0 
Due to affiliates362.5 388.1 
Deferred revenue126.4 120.8 
Deferred tax liabilities402.7 487.1 
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds279.3 683.9 
Lease liabilities502.9 537.8 
Accrued giveback obligations40.9 30.2 
Total liabilities14,581.7 15,544.2 
Commitments and contingencies
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000,000 shares authorized (362,298,650 and 355,367,876 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)3.6 3.6 
Additional paid-in capital3,138.5 2,717.6 
Retained earnings3,401.1 2,805.3 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(322.2)(247.5)
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities600.3 427.2 
Total equity6,821.3 5,706.2 
Total liabilities and equity$21,403.0 $21,250.4 
See accompanying notes.
174


The Carlyle Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of non-equity securities or other investments, which may include instruments that are not listed on an exchange, considers, among other factors, external pricing sources, such as dealer quotes or independent pricing services, recent trading activity or other information that,Operations
(Dollars in the opinionmillions, except share and per share data)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Revenues
Fund management fees$2,030.1 $1,667.5 $1,486.0 
Incentive fees63.7 48.8 37.0 
Investment income
Performance allocations1,327.5 6,084.6 1,635.9 
Principal investment income (loss)570.5 637.3 (540.7)
Total investment income1,898.0 6,721.9 1,095.2 
Interest and other income135.9 90.7 89.6 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds311.0 253.2 226.8 
Total revenues4,438.7 8,782.1 2,934.6 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits1,052.0 908.0 849.6 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation719.9 2,961.0 779.1 
Total compensation and benefits1,925.9 4,032.1 1,733.7 
General, administrative and other expenses575.8 431.7 349.3 
Interest110.4 113.3 94.0 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds211.6 178.5 163.5 
Other non-operating expenses (income)1.0 1.5 (7.2)
Total expenses2,824.7 4,757.1 2,333.3 
Other income (loss)
Net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds(41.5)2.5 (21.3)
Income before provision for income taxes1,572.5 4,027.5 580.0 
Provision for income taxes287.8 982.3 197.2 
Net income1,284.7 3,045.2 382.8 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities59.7 70.5 34.6 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. Common Stockholders$1,225.0 $2,974.7 $348.2 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. per common share (see Note 14)
Basic$3.39 $8.37 $0.99 
Diluted$3.35 $8.20 $0.97 
Weighted-average common shares
Basic361,278,064 355,241,653 350,464,315 
Diluted365,707,722 362,574,564 358,393,802 

Substantially all revenue is earned from affiliates of the Partnership, may not have been reflectedCompany. See accompanying notes.
175


The Carlyle Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in pricing obtained from external sources.millions)
When valuing private securities or assets without readily determinable market prices, the Partnership gives consideration to operating results, financial condition, economic and/or market events, recent sales prices and other pertinent information. These valuation procedures may vary by investment, but include such techniques as comparable public market

 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Net income$1,284.7 $3,045.2 $382.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(16.0), $1.2 and $(33.5) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively(107.8)(56.3)49.6 
Unrealized losses on Fortitude available-for-sale securities, net of income tax benefit of $(5.3) for the year ended December 31, 2020 — (20.0)
Defined benefit plans, net
Unrealized net income (loss) for the period, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $4.6, $2.9 and $(2.3) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively14.5 9.5 (9.0)
Less: reclassification adjustment for unrecognized gain during the period included in base compensation expense, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $0.3, $0.7 and $0.6 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively1.0 2.1 1.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(92.3)(44.7)22.4 
Comprehensive income1,192.4 3,000.5 405.2 
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities42.1 64.6 37.6 
Comprehensive income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.$1,150.3 $2,935.9 $367.6 
See accompanying notes.

196
176



The Carlyle Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollars and shares in millions)
Common
Units
Common SharesPartners’
Capital
Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit)Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesNon-
controlling
Interests in
Carlyle
Holdings
Total
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019117.8 — $703.8 $— $— $— $(85.2)$333.5 $2,017.5 $2,969.6 
Reclassification resulting from Conversion - Partners' Capital(117.8)117.8 (703.8)1.2 702.6 — — — — — 
Reclassification resulting from Conversion - Non-controlling Interest in Carlyle Holdings— 229.4 — 2.3 2,180.9 — (165.7)— (2,017.5)— 
Shares repurchased— (1.1)— — (26.4)— — — — (26.4)
Tax effects resulting from Conversion— — — — (62.9)— 22.8 — — (40.1)
Equity-based compensation— — — — 113.4 — — — — 113.4 
Shares issued for equity-based awards— 7.4 — — — — — — — — 
Contributions— — — — — — — 210.0 210.0 
Distributions— — — — (351.3)— — (77.8)— (429.1)
Net income— — — — — 348.2 — 34.6 — 382.8 
Deconsolidation of Consolidated Entities— — — — (10.1)— — (262.3)— (272.4)
Currency translation adjustments— — — — — — 46.6 3.0 — 49.6 
Unrealized loss on Fortitude available-for-sale securities— — — — — — (20.0)— — (20.0)
Defined benefit plans, net— — — — — — (7.2)— — (7.2)
Balance at December 31, 2020 353.5 $ $3.5 $2,546.2 $348.2 $(208.7)$241.0 $ $2,930.2 














Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollars and shares in millions)
Common SharesCommon
Stock
Additional Paid-in CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit)Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesTotal
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2020353.5 $3.5 $2,546.2 $348.2 $(208.7)$241.0 $2,930.2 
Shares repurchased(3.2)  (161.8)  (161.8)
Equity-based compensation 0.1 166.6    166.7 
Shares issued for equity-based awards5.0       
Shares issued for performance allocations0.1  4.8    4.8 
Contributions     216.2 216.2 
Distributions   (355.8) (94.6)(450.4)
Net income   2,974.7  70.5 3,045.2 
Currency translation adjustments    (50.4)(5.9)(56.3)
Defined benefit plans, net    11.6  11.6 
Balance at December 31, 2021355.4 $3.6 $2,717.6 $2,805.3 $(247.5)$427.2 $5,706.2 
Shares repurchased(5.0)$ $ $(185.6)$ $ $(185.6)
Equity-based compensation  162.5    162.5 
Shares issued for equity-based awards6.2       
Shares issued for performance allocations0.9  38.9    38.9 
Shares issued related to the acquisition of CBAM4.2  194.5    194.5 
Shares issued related to the acquisition of Abingworth0.6  25.0    25.0 
Contributions     391.2 391.2 
Distributions   (443.6) (216.8)(660.4)
Net income   1,225.0  59.7 1,284.7 
Deconsolidation of a Consolidated Entity     (47.6)(47.6)
Non-controlling interests related to the acquisition of Abingworth     4.2 4.2 
Currency translation adjustments    (90.2)(17.6)(107.8)
Defined benefit plans, net    15.5  15.5 
Balance at December 31, 2022362.3 $3.6 $3,138.5 $3,401.1 $(322.2)$600.3 $6,821.3 
See accompanying notes.

177

The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income$1,284.7 $3,045.2 $382.8 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization147.4 52.0 52.1 
Right-of-use asset impairment, net of broker fees— 24.8 — 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Non-cash performance allocations and incentive fees, net393.6 (1,670.7)(631.8)
Non-cash principal investment (income) loss(553.4)(618.5)534.4 
Other non-cash amounts(10.3)29.1 (2.9)
Consolidated Funds related:
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on investments of Consolidated Funds408.1 (76.6)29.1 
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss from loans payable of Consolidated Funds(366.6)74.1 (7.8)
Purchases of investments by Consolidated Funds(3,826.2)(5,407.0)(3,140.0)
Proceeds from sale and settlements of investments by Consolidated Funds2,860.4 4,888.7 2,013.8 
Non-cash interest income, net(12.1)(11.8)(8.1)
Change in cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds(61.0)30.3 13.9 
Change in other receivables held at Consolidated Funds19.3 (45.7)(5.4)
Change in other liabilities held at Consolidated Funds(336.8)115.6 220.9 
Other non-cash amounts of Consolidated Funds0.1 — 0.5 
Purchases of investments(629.9)(276.7)(271.3)
Purchase of investment in Fortitude Re— — (79.6)
Proceeds from the sale of investments474.9 668.4 307.5 
Payments of contingent consideration(5.7)(48.0)— 
Changes in deferred taxes, net(73.2)508.4 134.5 
Change in due from affiliates and other receivables(82.5)(25.7)1.9 
Change in deposits and other(11.8)(12.5)(2.0)
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(14.3)105.7 (4.0)
Change in accrued compensation and benefits(135.4)239.0 210.1 
Change in due to affiliates1.7 0.2 (29.2)
Change in lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities(8.8)4.5 (9.8)
Change in deferred revenue4.5 35.1 16.2 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(379.3)1,791.0 (169.2)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of corporate treasury investments(69.6)— — 
Proceeds from corporate treasury investments50.0 — — 
Purchases of fixed assets, net(40.6)(41.4)(61.2)
Purchase of Abingworth, net of cash acquired(150.2)— — 
Purchase of CBAM intangibles and investments(618.4)— — 
Proceeds from sale of MRE, net of cash sold— 5.9 — 
Proceeds from sale of Brazil management entity, net of cash sold— 3.3 — 
Net cash used in investing activities(828.8)(32.2)(61.2)
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings under credit facilities— 70.0 294.1 
Repayments under credit facilities— (70.0)(329.9)
Issuance of 4.625% subordinated notes due 2061, net of financing costs— 484.1 — 
Repurchase of 3.875% senior notes due 2023— (259.9)— 
Proceeds from CLO borrowings, net of financing costs73.2 111.7 20.5 
Payments on CLO borrowings(16.7)(232.5)(3.8)
Net borrowings on loans payable of Consolidated Funds624.2 182.9 704.1 
Payments of contingent consideration— (0.1)(0.3)
Dividends to common stockholders(443.6)(355.8)(351.3)
Payment of deferred consideration for Carlyle Holdings units(68.8)(68.8)(68.8)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders391.2 216.2 210.0 
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders(216.8)(94.6)(77.8)
Common shares issued for performance allocations38.9 4.8 — 
Common shares repurchased(185.6)(161.8)(26.4)
Change in due to/from affiliates financing activities(81.2)(68.7)0.7 
Change in due to/from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds— — (0.8)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities114.8 (242.5)370.3 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes(20.3)(30.8)21.7 
(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1,113.6)1,485.5 161.6 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period2,475.1 989.6 828.0 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Supplemental cash disclosures
Cash paid for interest$91.5 $92.7 $80.1 
Cash paid for income taxes$402.1 $402.6 $35.4 
Supplemental non-cash disclosures
Issuance of common shares related to the acquisition of CBAM and Abingworth$219.5 $— $— 
Tax effects from the conversion to a Corporation recorded in equity$— $— $40.1 
Net asset impact of deconsolidation of Consolidated Funds$(47.7)$(34.4)$(253.6)
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 $987.6 
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 2.0 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds$209.0 $147.8 $148.6 

See accompanying notes.
178

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
    Carlyle is one of the world’s largest global investment firms that deploys private capital across its business through three reportable segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions (see Note 17). In the Global Private Equity segment, Carlyle advises buyout, growth, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds. The primary areas of focus for the Global Credit segment are liquid credit, illiquid credit, real assets credit, and other credit such as insurance solutions, loan syndication and capital markets. The Global Investment Solutions segment provides investment opportunities and resources for investors and clients through secondary purchases and financing of existing portfolios, managed co-investment programs and primary fund investments. Carlyle typically serves as the general partner, investment manager or collateral manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of these products.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, certain Carlyle-affiliated funds, related co-investment entities and certain CLOs managed by the Company (collectively the “Consolidated Funds”) have been consolidated in the accompanying financial statements pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), as described in Note 3. The consolidation of the Consolidated Funds generally has a gross-up effect on assets, liabilities and cash flows, and generally has no effect on the net income attributable to the Company. The economic ownership interests of the other investors in the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (see Note 3).
2. Recent Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company completed several transactions as outlined below.
Acquisition of Abingworth LLP (See Note 4)
On August 1, 2022, the Company acquired Abingworth LLP (“Abingworth”), a life sciences investment firm for a base purchase price of $186.2 million, of which $25.0 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock. Consideration for Abingworth also includes up to $130 million in future incentive payments on the achievement of certain performance targets. The acquisition includes the rights to 15% of performance allocations generated by Abingworth’s two most recent active investment funds, Abingworth Bioventures 8 LP and Abingworth Clinical Co-Development Fund 2 LP.
Fortitude Capital Raise and Strategic Advisory Services Agreement (See Note 6)
In March 2022, the Company raised $2.0 billion in third-party equity capital from certain investors in Carlyle FRL and T&D and committed $100 million from the Company to Carlyle FRL for additional equity capital in Fortitude. In May 2022, Fortitude called $1.1 billion of the capital raise, with the remaining capital expected to be called in 2023. In connection with the capital raise and subsequent funding, the Company’s indirect ownership of Fortitude decreased from 19.9% to 13.5% and is expected to further decrease to 10.5% upon funding the remainder of the capital raise.
On April 1, 2022, the Company entered into a new strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude through a newly-formed investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C. (“CISM”). Under the agreement, CISM provides Fortitude with certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability.
Acquisition of CLO Management Contracts from CBAM Partners LLC (See Note 4)
On March 21, 2022, the Company acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”) for a purchase price of $812.9 million, of which $194.5 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the acquisition of the CLO management contracts, the Company acquired CLO senior and subordinated notes of $175.9 million, a portion of which is financed through term loans and other financing arrangements.
Acquisition of iStar Triple Net Lease Portfolio (See Note 6)
In March 2022, Carlyle Net Leasing Income, L.P., a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund, acquired a diversified portfolio of triple net leases for an enterprise value of $3 billion, which was funded using $2 billion in debt and $1 billion in equity. The investment fund is not consolidated by the Company and the debt is non-recourse to the Company. Carlyle, as general partner of the investment fund, contributed $200 million as a minority interest balance sheet investment, which is included in the Company’s Global Credit principal equity method investments.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The Company consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”).
The Company evaluates (1) whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, (2) whether the entity is a VIE, and (3) whether the Company’s involvement would make it the primary beneficiary. In evaluating whether the Company holds a variable interest, fees (including management fees, incentive fees and performance allocations) that are customary and commensurate with the level of services provided, and where the Company does not hold other economic interests in the entity that would absorb more than an insignificant amount of the expected losses or returns of the entity, are not considered variable interests. The Company considers all economic interests, including indirect interests, to determine if a fee is considered a variable interest.
For those entities where the Company holds a variable interest, the Company determines whether each of these entities qualifies as a VIE and, if so, whether or not the Company is the primary beneficiary. The assessment of whether the entity is a VIE is generally performed qualitatively, which requires judgment. These judgments include: (a) determining whether the equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) evaluating whether the equity holders, as a group, can make decisions that have a significant effect on the economic performance of the entity, (c) determining whether two or more parties’ equity interests should be aggregated, and (d) determining whether the equity investors have proportionate voting rights to their obligations to absorb losses or rights to receive returns from an entity.
For entities that are determined to be VIEs, the Company consolidates those entities where it has concluded it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined as the variable interest holder with (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In evaluating whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by the Company.
As of December 31, 2022, assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the consolidated balance sheets were $7.2 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the consolidated balance sheets were $6.9 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively. Except to the extent of the consolidated assets of the VIEs, the holders of the consolidated VIEs’ liabilities generally do not have recourse to the Company.
The Company’s Consolidated Funds are primarily CLOs, which are VIEs that issue loans payable that are backed by diversified collateral asset portfolios consisting primarily of loans or structured debt. In exchange for managing the collateral for the CLOs, the Company earns investment management fees, including in some cases subordinated management fees and contingent incentive fees. In cases where the Company consolidates the CLOs (primarily because of a retained interest that is significant to the CLO), those management fees and contingent incentive fees have been eliminated as intercompany transactions. As of December 31, 2022, the Company held $110.6 million of investments in these CLOs which represents its maximum risk of loss. The Company’s investments in these CLOs are generally subordinated to other interests in the entities and entitle the Company to receive a pro rata portion of the residual cash flows, if any, from the entities. Investors in the CLOs have no recourse against the Company for any losses sustained in the CLO structure. The Company’s Consolidated Funds also include certain investment funds in our Global Private Equity segment that are actively fundraising and are accounted for as consolidated VIEs due to the Company providing financing to bridge investment purchases. As of December 31, 2022, the Company held $374.6 million of notes receivable, including accrued interest, from these investment funds which represents its maximum risk of loss.
179

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Entities that do not qualify as VIEs are generally assessed for consolidation as voting interest entities. Under the voting interest entity model, the Company consolidates those entities it controls through a majority voting interest.
All significant inter-entity transactions and balances of entities consolidated have been eliminated.

Investments in Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Company holds variable interests in certain VIEs that are not consolidated because the Company is not the primary beneficiary, including its investments in certain CLOs and certain AlpInvest vehicles, as well as its strategic investment in NGP Management Company, L.L.C. (“NGP Management” and, together with its affiliates, “NGP”). Refer to Note 6 for information on the strategic investment in NGP. The Company’s involvement with such entities is in the form of direct or indirect equity interests and fee arrangements. The maximum exposure to loss represents the loss of assets recognized by the Company relating to its variable interests in these unconsolidated entities. The assets recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets related to the Company’s variable interests in these non-consolidated VIEs were as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Investments$1,124.0 $901.9 
Accrued performance allocations406.0 368.7 
Management fee receivables49.6 27.2 
Total$1,579.6 $1,297.8 
These amounts represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss related to the unconsolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Basis of Accounting
The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management has determined that the Company’s Funds are investment companies under U.S. GAAP for the purposes of financial reporting. U.S. GAAP for an investment company requires investments to be recorded at estimated fair value and the unrealized gains and/or losses in an investment’s fair value are recognized on a current basis in the statements of operations. Additionally, the Funds do not consolidate their majority-owned and controlled investments (the “Portfolio Companies”). In the preparation of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has retained the specialized accounting for the Funds.

All of the investments held and notes issued by the Consolidated Funds are presented at their estimated fair values in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Interest and other income of the Consolidated Funds, interest expense and other expenses of the Consolidated Funds, and net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on historical experiences and other factors, including expectations of future events that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Assumptions and estimates regarding the valuation comparableof investments and their resulting impact on performance allocations and incentive fees involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and these assumptions and estimates may be significant to the consolidated financial statements and the resulting impact on performance allocations and incentive fees. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.

    Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting, under which the purchase price of the acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration obligations that are elements of consideration transferred are
180

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
recognized as of the acquisition date as part of the fair value transferred in exchange for the acquired business. Acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.

    Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Revenue is recognized when the Company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 includes a five-step framework that requires an entity to: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, which includes assessing the collectability of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services transferred to the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The Company accounts for performance allocations that represent a performance-based capital allocation from fund limited partners to the Company (commonly known as “carried interest”), as earnings from financial assets within the scope of ASC 323, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures, and therefore are not in the scope of ASC 606. In accordance with ASC 323, the Company records equity method income (losses) as a component of investment income based on the change in its proportionate claim on net assets of the investment fund, including performance allocations, assuming the investment fund was liquidated as of each reporting date pursuant to each fund’s governing agreements. See Note 6 for additional information on the components of investments and investment income. Performance fees that do not meet the definition of performance-based capital allocations are in the scope of ASC 606 and are included in incentive fees in the consolidated statements of operations. The calculation of unrealized performance revenues utilizes investment valuations of the funds’ underlying investments, which are derived using the policies, methodologies and templates prepared by the Company’s valuation group, as described in Note 5, Fair Value Measurement.
While the determination of who is the customer in a contractual arrangement will be made on a contract-by-contract basis, the customer will generally be the investment fund for the Company’s significant management and discountedadvisory contracts. The customer determination impacts the Company’s analysis of the accounting for contract costs.
Fund Management Fees
The Company provides management services to funds in which it holds a general partner interest or to funds or certain portfolio companies with which it has an investment advisory or investment management agreement. The Company considers the performance obligations in its contracts with its funds to be the promise to provide (or to arrange for third parties to provide) investment management services related to the management, policies and operations of the funds.

As it relates to the Company’s performance obligation to provide investment management services, the Company typically satisfies this performance obligation over time as the services are rendered, since the funds simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided as the Company performs the service. The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised services to the funds. Management fees earned from each investment management contract over the contract life represent variable consideration because the consideration the Company is entitled to varies based on fluctuations in the basis for the management fee, for example fund net asset value (“NAV”) or assets under management (“AUM”). Given that the management fee basis is susceptible to market factors outside of the Company’s influence, management fees are constrained and, therefore, estimates of future period management fees are generally not included in the transaction price. Revenue recognized for the investment management services provided is generally the amount determined at the end of the period because that is when the uncertainty for that period is resolved.

For closed-end carry funds in the Global Private Equity and Global Credit segments, management fees generally range from 1.0% to 2.0% of commitments during the fund’s investment period based on limited partners’ capital commitments to the funds. Following the expiration or termination of the investment period, management fees generally are based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and the rate charged may also be reduced. These terms may vary for separately managed accounts, longer-dated carry funds, and other closed-end funds. The Company will receive management fees during a specified period of time, which is generally ten years from the initial closing date, or, in some instances, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances or later if extended for successive one year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Depending upon the contracted terms of investment advisory or investment management and related agreements, these fees are generally called semi-annually in advance and are recognized as earned
181

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
over the subsequent six month period. For certain longer-dated carry funds and certain other closed-end funds, management fees are called quarterly over the life of the funds.

Within the Global Credit segment, for CLOs and other structured products, management fees generally range from 0.4% to 0.5% based on the total par amount of assets or the aggregate principal amount of the notes in the CLO and are due quarterly in arrears based on the terms and recognized over the respective period. Management fees for the CLOs and other structured products are governed by indentures and collateral management agreements. The Company will receive management fees for the CLOs until redemption of the securities issued by the CLOs, which is generally five to ten years after issuance. Management fees for the business development companies are due quarterly in arrears at annual rates that range from 1.0% of capital under management to 1.5% of gross assets, excluding cash flow analysis.and cash equivalents. Management fees for the Interval Fund are due monthly in arrears at the annual rate of 1.0% of the month-end value of the Interval Fund’s net assets. Carlyle Aviation Partners’ funds have varying management fee arrangements depending on the strategy of the particular fund. Under the
strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, the Company earns a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s
general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability and which is due
quarterly in arrears.

Management fees for the Company’s carry fund vehicles in the Global Investment Solutions segment generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% of the vehicle’s capital commitments during the commitment fee period of the relevant fund. Following the expiration of the commitment fee period, the management fees generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% on (i) the net invested capital; (ii) the lower of cost or net asset value of the capital invested, or (iii) the net asset value for unrealized investments. Management fees for the Global Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles are generally due quarterly in advance and recognized over the related quarter.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, management fee receivables, net of allowances for credit losses, were $236.9 million and $164.5 million, respectively, and are included in due from affiliates and other receivables, net, in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company also provides transaction advisory and portfolio advisory services to the portfolio companies, and where covered by separate contractual agreements, recognizes fees for these services when the performance obligation has been satisfied and collection is reasonably assured. The Company also recognizes underwriting fees from the Company’s loan syndication and capital markets business, Carlyle Global Capital Markets. Fund management fees includes transaction and portfolio advisory fees, as well as capital markets fees, of $106.2 million, $90.7 million and $50.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, net of any offsets as defined in the respective partnership agreements.

Fund management fees exclude the reimbursement of any partnership expenses paid by the Company on behalf of the Carlyle funds pursuant to the limited partnership agreements, including amounts related to the pursuit of actual, proposed, or unconsummated investments, professional fees, expenses associated with the acquisition, holding and disposition of investments, and other fund administrative expenses. For the professional fees that the Company arranges for the investment funds, the Company concluded that the nature of its promise is to arrange for the services to be provided and it does not control the services provided by third parties before they are transferred to the customer. Therefore, the Company concluded it is acting in the capacity of an agent. Accordingly, the reimbursement for these professional fees paid on behalf of the investment funds is presented on a net basis in general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company also incurs certain costs, primarily employee travel and entertainment costs, employee compensation and systems costs, for which it receives reimbursement from the investment funds in connection with its performance obligation to provide investment and management services. For reimbursable travel, compensation and systems costs, the Company concluded it controls the services provided by its employees and the resources used to develop applicable systems before they are transferred to the customer and therefore is a principal. Accordingly, the reimbursement for these costs incurred by the Company to manage the fund limited partnerships are presented on a gross basis in interest and other income in the consolidated statements of operations and the expense in general, administrative and other expenses or cash-based compensation and benefits expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

Incentive Fees
In connection with management contracts from certain of its Global Credit funds, the Company is also entitled to receive performance-based incentive fees when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, incentive fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been
182

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
achieved. Incentive fees are variable consideration because they are contingent upon the investment vehicle achieving stipulated investment return hurdles. Investment returns are highly susceptible to market factors outside of the Company’s influence. Accordingly, incentive fees are constrained until all uncertainty is resolved. Estimates of future period incentive fees are generally not included in the transaction price because these estimates are constrained. The transaction price for incentive fees is generally the amount determined at the end of each accounting period to which they relate because that is when the uncertainty for that period is resolved, as these fees are not subject to clawback.

Investment Income (Loss), including Performance Allocations
Investment income (loss) represents the unrealized and realized gains and losses resulting from the Company’s equity method investments, including any associated general partner performance allocations, and other principal investments, including CLOs.

General partner performance allocations consist of the allocation of profits from certain of the funds to which the Company is entitled (commonly known as carried interest). For closed-end carry funds in the Global Private Equity and Global Credit segments, the Company is generally entitled to a 20% allocation (or approximately 2% to 12.5% for most of the Global Investment Solutions segment carry fund vehicles) of the net realized income or gain as a carried interest after returning the invested capital, the allocation of preferred returns of generally 7% to 9% and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement). These terms may vary on longer-dated funds, certain credit funds, and external co-investment vehicles. Carried interest is recognized upon appreciation of the funds’ investment values above certain return hurdles set forth in each respective partnership agreement. The Company recognizes revenues attributable to performance allocations based upon the amount that would be due pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were terminated at that date. Accordingly, the amount recognized as investment income for performance allocations reflects the Company’s share of the gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. Because of the inherent uncertainty, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is reasonably possible that the difference could be material. Furthermore, there
Carried interest is no assurance that, upon liquidation,ultimately realized when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of, (ii) certain costs borne by the Partnership will realizelimited partner investors have been reimbursed, (iii) the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return and (iv) the Company has decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. Realized carried interest may be required to be returned by the Company in future periods if the fund’s investment values presented herein.
Upondecline below certain levels. When the salefair value of a securityfund’s investments remains constant or otherfalls below certain return hurdles, previously recognized performance allocations are reversed. In all cases, each fund is considered separately in this regard, and for a given fund, performance allocations can never be negative over the life of a fund. If upon a hypothetical liquidation of a fund’s investments at their then current fair values, previously recognized and distributed carried interest would be required to be returned, a liability is established for the potential giveback obligation. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company has accrued $40.9 million and $30.2 million, respectively, for giveback obligations.
Principal investment income (loss) is realized when the realized net gainCompany redeems all or lossa portion of its investment or when the Company receives or is computed on a weighted average cost basis, withdue cash income, such as dividends or distributions. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from the exceptionCompany’s proportionate share of the investments held by the CLOs, which compute the realized net gain or loss on a first in, first out basis. Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.
Equity-Method Investments
The Partnership accounts for all investments in which it has or is otherwise presumed to have significant influence,investee’s unrealized earnings, including investments in the unconsolidated Funds and strategic investments, using the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of equity-method investments is determined based on amounts invested by the Partnership, adjusted for the equity in earnings or losses of the investee allocated based on the respective partnership agreement, less distributions received. The Partnership evaluates its equity-method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held at banks and cash held for distributions, including temporary investments with original maturities of less than three months when purchased.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Held at Consolidated Funds
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds consists of cash and cash equivalents held by the Consolidated Funds, which, although not legally restricted, is not available to fund the general liquidity needs of the Partnership.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily represents cash held by the Partnership's foreign subsidiaries due to certain government regulatory capital requirements as well as certain amounts held on behalf of Carlyle funds.
Corporate Treasury Investments
Corporate treasury investments represent investments in U.S. Treasury and government agency obligations, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, other investment grade securities and other investments with original maturities of greater than three months when purchased. These investments are accounted for as trading securities in which changes in the fair value of eachthe underlying investment, are recorded throughas well as the reversal of unrealized gain (loss) at the time an investment is realized. Principal investment income (loss) also includes the Company’s allocation of earnings from its investment in Fortitude through June 2, 2020 (see Note 6). AnyAs it relates to the Company’s investments in NGP (see Note 6), principal investment income includes the related amortization of the basis difference between the Company’s carrying value of its investment and the Company’s share of underlying net assets of the investee, as well as the compensation expense associated with compensatory arrangements provided by the Company to employees of its equity method investee.

Interest Income
Interest income is recognized when earned. For debt securities representing non-investment grade beneficial interests in securitizations, the effective yield is determined based on the estimated cash flows of the security. Changes in the effective yield of these securities due to changes in estimated cash flows are recognized on a prospective basis as adjustments to interest income in future periods. Interest income earned on debt investmentsby the Company is recorded throughincluded in interest and other income.
Derivative Instruments
The Partnership uses derivative instruments primarily to reduce its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair valueincome in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in fair value recognized in theaccompanying consolidated statements of operations for all derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets consist of furniture, fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements, and computer hardware and software and are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements are the lesseroperations. Interest income of the lease terms or the life of the asset,Consolidated Funds was $282.3 million, $231.3 million and three to seven years for other fixed assets. Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Partnership’s intangible assets consist of acquired contractual rights to earn future fee income, including management and advisory fees, customer relationships, and acquired trademarks. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized

197
183


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to ten years, and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired and is recorded in the functional currency of the acquired entity. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1st and between annual tests when events and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents management fees and other revenue received prior to the balance sheet date, which has not yet been earned.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Partnership’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments and gains and losses on defined benefit plans sponsored by AlpInvest. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Currency translation adjustments$(68.8) $(91.7)
Unrealized losses on defined benefit plans(3.9) (3.5)
Total$(72.7) $(95.2)
Foreign Currency Translation
Non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are translated at period-end rates of exchange, and the consolidated statements of operations are translated at rates of exchange in effect throughout the period. Foreign currency (gains) losses resulting from transactions outside of the functional currency of an entity of $(3.9) million, $(26.3) million and $2.5$211.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, areand is included in interest and other income of Consolidated Funds in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Credit Losses
Under ASU 2016-13, the Company is required to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company assesses the collection risk characteristics of the outstanding amounts in its due from affiliates balance into the following pools of receivables:
Reimbursable fund expenses receivables,
Management fee receivables,
Incentive fee receivables,
Transaction fee receivables,
Portfolio fee receivables, and
Notes receivable.
The Company generally utilizes either historical credit loss information or discounted cash flows to calculate expected credit losses for each pool. The Company’s receivables are predominantly with its investment funds, which have low risk of credit loss based on the Company’s historical experience. Historical credit loss data may be adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including the Company’s expectation of near-term realization based on the liquidity of the affiliated investment funds.
Compensation and Benefits
Cash-based Compensation and Benefits – Cash-based compensation and benefits includes salaries, bonuses (discretionary awards and guaranteed amounts), performance payment arrangements and benefits paid and payable to Carlyle employees. Bonuses are accrued over the service period to which they relate.
Equity-Based Compensation – Compensation expense relating to the issuance of equity-based awards is measured at fair value on the grant date. The compensation expense for awards that vest over a future service period is recognized over the relevant service period on a straight-line basis. The compensation expense for awards that do not require future service is recognized immediately. Cash settled equity-based awards are classified as liabilities and are re-measured at the end of each reporting period. The compensation expense for awards that contain performance conditions is recognized when it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved; in certain instances, such compensation expense may be recognized prior to the grant date of the award. The compensation expense for awards that contain market conditions is based on a grant-date fair value that factors in the probability that the market conditions will be achieved and is recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis.
Equity-based awards issued to non-employees are generally recognized as general, administrative and other expenses, except to the extent they are recognized as part of the Company’s equity method earnings because they are issued to employees of equity method investees.
The Company recognizes equity-based award forfeitures in the period they occur as a reversal of previously recognized compensation expense. The reduction in compensation expense is determined based on the specific awards forfeited during that period. Furthermore, the Company recognizes all excess tax benefits and deficiencies as income tax benefit or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Performance Allocations and Incentive Fee Related Compensation – A portion of the performance allocations and incentive fees earned is due to employees and advisors of the Company. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the recognition of the related performance allocations and incentive fee revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Accordingly, upon a reversal of performance allocations or incentive fee revenue, the related compensation expense, if any, is also reversed. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had recorded a liability of $3.6 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, related to the portion of accrued performance allocations and incentive fees due to employees and advisors, respectively, which was included in accrued compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
184

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In October 2021, the Company commenced a program under which, at the Company’s discretion, up to 20% of the realized performance allocation related compensation over a threshold amount may be distributed in fully vested newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares issued under the program are accounted for as performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation and do not result in incremental compensation expense. The Company has determined to pause the issuance of shares pursuant to this program.
Income Taxes
The Carlyle Group Inc. is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thus is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes. Prior to the Conversion, The Carlyle Group L.P. was generally organized as a series of pass-through entities and therefore generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes, with the exception of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries which were subject to federal, state, local and foreign corporate income taxes at the entity level. Tax positions taken by the Company are subject to periodic audit by U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxing authorities.
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the period in which the difference is expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period of the change in the provision for income taxes. Further, deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected realization of available net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is recorded on the Company’s gross deferred tax assets when it is “more likely than not” that such asset will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, all evidence, both positive and negative, is evaluated. Items considered in this analysis include the ability to carry back losses, the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and expectations of future earnings. The Company accounts for the valuation allowance assessment on its deferred tax assets and without regard to the Company’s potential future corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) status. Lastly, the Company accounts for the tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) as incurred and therefore has not recorded deferred taxes related to GILTI on its foreign subsidiaries.
    Under U.S. GAAP for income taxes, the amount of tax benefit to be recognized is the amount of benefit that is “more likely than not” to be sustained upon examination. The Company analyzes its tax filing positions in all of the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as for all open tax years in these jurisdictions. If, based on this analysis, the Company determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist, a liability is established, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in the provision for income taxes. If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax positions would be recorded as a reduction in the provision for income taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We discuss recent accounting pronouncements in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In August 2017,
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary exposure to market risk is related to our role as general partner or investment advisor to our investment funds and the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivativessensitivities to movements in the fair value of their investments, including the effect on management fees, incentive fees, performance allocations and Hedging (Topic 815) - Targeted Improvementsprincipal investment income.
Although our investment funds share many common themes, each of our asset management asset classes runs its own investment and risk management processes, subject to Accounting for Hedging Activities. ASU 2017-12, amongour overall risk tolerance and philosophy. The investment process of our investment funds involves a comprehensive due diligence approach, including review of reputation of shareholders and management, company size and sensitivity of cash flow generation, business sector and competitive risks, portfolio fit, exit risks and other things, permits hedge accounting for risk componentskey factors highlighted by the deal team. Key investment decisions are subject to approval by both the fund-level managing directors, as well as the investment committee, which is generally comprised of one or more of the three founding partners, one “sector” head, one or more advisors and senior investment professionals associated with that particular fund. Once an investment in hedging relationshipsa portfolio company has been made, our fund teams closely monitor the performance of the portfolio company, generally through frequent contact with management and the receipt of financial and management reports.
Effect on Fund Management Fees
Management fees will only be directly affected by short-term changes in market conditions to now involve nonfinancial risk components and requires an entitythe extent they are based on NAV or represent permanent impairments of value. These management fees will be increased (or reduced) in direct proportion to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrumentchanges in the same income statement line itemmarket value of our investments in which the earnings effectrelated funds. In addition, the terms of the hedge itemgoverning agreements with respect to certain of our carry funds provide that the management fee base will be reduced when the aggregate fair market value of a fund’s investments is reported.below its cost. The guidanceproportion of our management fees that are based on NAV is effective fordependent on the Partnershipnumber and types of investment funds in existence and the current stage of each fund’s life cycle.
Effect on January 1, 2019Performance Allocations
Performance allocations reflect revenue primarily from carried interest on our carry funds. In our discussion of “Key Financial Measures” and requires cash flow hedges and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption to apply a cumulative effect adjustment to eliminate the measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of partners’ capital as“Critical Accounting Policies,” we disclose that performance allocations are recognized upon appreciation of the beginningvaluation of our funds’ investments above certain return hurdles and are based upon the fiscal yearamount that an entity adoptswould be due to Carlyle at each reporting date as if the guidance. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. While the Partnership is still assessing the guidancefunds were liquidated at their then-current fair values. Changes in ASU 2017-12, it does not expect the impact of this guidance to be material.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-1, Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business. ASU 2017-01 changes the criteria for determining whether a group of assets acquired is a business. Specifically, when substantially all of the fair value of the grossfunds’ investments may materially impact performance allocations depending upon the respective funds’ performance to date as compared to its hurdle rate and the related carry waterfall.

The following table summarizes the incremental impact, including our Consolidated Funds, of a 10% change in total remaining fair value by segment as of December 31, 2022 on our performance allocations revenue:
10% Increase
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
10% Decrease
in Total
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,913.5 $(2,113.9)
Global Credit191.9 (112.3)
Global Investment Solutions255.6 (248.3)
Total$2,361.0 $(2,474.5)
169


The following table summarizes the incremental impact of a 10% change in Level III remaining fair value by segment as of December 31, 2022 on our performance allocations revenue:
10% Increase
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
10% Decrease
in Level III
Remaining
Fair Value
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,828.4 $(2,006.7)
Global Credit186.6 (110.8)
Global Investment Solutions247.8 (241.4)
Total$2,262.8 $(2,358.9)
The effect of the variability in performance allocations revenue would be in part offset by performance allocation related compensation.
Effect on Assets Under Management
Generally, our Fee-earning assets acquiredunder management are not affected by changes in valuation. However, total assets under management is concentratedimpacted by valuation changes to net asset value. The table below shows the remaining fair value and the percentage amount classified as Level III investments as defined within the fair value standards of U.S. GAAP:
Remaining Fair ValuePercentage Amount
Classified as Level
III Investments
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$123,673 95 %
Global Credit$132,924 75 %
Global Investment Solutions$43,521 97 %
Exchange Rate Risk
Our investment funds hold investments that are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies that may be affected by movements in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar currencies. Non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and the consolidated statements of operations accounts are translated at rates of exchange in effect throughout the year. Additionally, a single identifiable asset or groupportion of similar identifiable assets,our management fees are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. We estimate that as of December 31, 2022, if there was a 10% decline in the assets acquired would not be considered a business. The guidance is effectiverate of exchange of all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, the impact on our consolidated results of operations for the Partnershipyear then ended would be as follows: (a) fund management fees would decrease by $49.5 million, (b) performance allocations would decrease by $72.0 million and (c) principal investment income would remain flat.
Interest Rate Risk
We have obligations under our CLO term loans that accrue interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes may therefore affect the amount of interest payments, future earnings and cash flows. The CLO term loans incur interest at EURIBOR plus an applicable rate. We do not have any interest rate swaps in place for these borrowings.

Based on January 1, 2018our debt obligations payable as of December 31, 2022, we estimate that interest expense relating to variable rates would increase by approximately $4.2 million on an annual basis in the event interest rates were to increase by one percentage point.
Credit Risk
Certain of our investment funds hold derivative instruments that contain an element of risk in the event that the counterparties are unable to meet the terms of such agreements. We minimize our risk exposure by limiting the counterparties with which we enter into contracts to banks and investment banks who meet established credit and capital guidelines. We do not expect any counterparty to default on its obligations and therefore do not expect to incur any loss due to counterparty default.

170


ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of The Carlyle Group Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Carlyle Group Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)and our report dated February 9, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be applied prospectively, however, early adoption is permitted. This guidance will impactindependent with respect to the Partnership's analysisCompany in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any future acquisitions occurring afterway our opinion on the date of adoption.consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-4, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 simplifies an entity’s annual goodwill test for impairment by eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill, and instead an entity should compare the fair value of a reporting


198
171



Measurement of principal equity method investments, including accrued performance allocations
Description of the matterAt December 31, 2022, the carrying value of the Company’s investments totaled approximately $10.8 billion and included principal equity method investments in sponsored unconsolidated funds (collectively, the “funds” or each, a “fund”) of approximately $3.7 billion and accrued performance allocations of approximately $7.1 billion. As discussed in Notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, a significant input to the measurement of the Company’s principal equity method investments in the funds, including accrued performance allocations, is management’s estimate of the fair value of the investments held by each fund. Management estimates the fair value of the funds’ investments, including investments in the equity of private operating companies, real estate properties and certain debt positions, by applying the methodologies outlined in Notes 3 and 6 and using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions.
 
Auditing management’s estimates of the fair value of the funds’ investments, valued using significant unobservable inputs and assumptions, was complex and highly judgmental because these investments exhibit higher estimation uncertainty.

How we addressed the matter in our auditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the funds’ investment valuation process. This included management's review controls over the assessment of the methodologies, significant inputs and assumptions included in the fair value estimates, as well as management’s review around the completeness, accuracy and reasonableness of the data used in these estimates.
 
Our audit procedures related to valuations using significant unobservable inputs included, among others, assessing whether the valuation methodologies used were appropriate and testing the mathematical accuracy of the valuation models.

For a sample of investments, we obtained management’s valuation models and compared objective inputs used in the models to agreements or underlying source documents provided by the Company. We also assessed the appropriateness of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the fair value estimates by comparing them to underlying support or available market data and evaluating the appropriateness of any significant adjustments. Our procedures varied based on the nature of the fund investment selected for testing.

For example, for certain investments in the equity of private operating companies, we assessed the appropriateness of management’s determination of public market comparable companies and similar transactions. For these selected investments, we also evaluated significant adjustments applied to the selected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiple or discount rate derived from the comparable companies by considering investee specific and relevant market information.

For a sample of investments that were sold during the year, we performed procedures to assess the historical reasonableness of management’s estimates. We also reviewed management’s assessment of subsequent events and transactions and considered whether they corroborated or contradicted the year-end estimates.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
Tysons, VA

February 9, 2023


172


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of The Carlyle Group Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited The Carlyle Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The Carlyle Group Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and our report dated February 9, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tysons, VA
February 9, 2023
173


The Carlyle Group Inc.



Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions)
 December 31,
 20222021
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds209.0 147.8 
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 
Corporate treasury investments20.0 — 
Investments, including accrued performance allocations of $7,117.7 and $8,133.0 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively10,767.9 10,832.0 
Investments of Consolidated Funds6,894.4 6,661.0 
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net579.4 379.6 
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net101.9 138.8 
Fixed assets, net139.9 143.9 
Lease right-of-use assets, net337.0 361.1 
Deposits and other78.4 61.7 
Intangible assets, net897.8 34.9 
Deferred tax assets15.8 14.5 
Total assets$21,403.0 $21,250.4 
Liabilities and equity
Debt obligations$2,271.7 $2,071.6 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds5,905.2 5,890.0 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities369.2 379.7 
Accrued compensation and benefits4,320.9 4,955.0 
Due to affiliates362.5 388.1 
Deferred revenue126.4 120.8 
Deferred tax liabilities402.7 487.1 
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds279.3 683.9 
Lease liabilities502.9 537.8 
Accrued giveback obligations40.9 30.2 
Total liabilities14,581.7 15,544.2 
Commitments and contingencies
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000,000 shares authorized (362,298,650 and 355,367,876 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)3.6 3.6 
Additional paid-in capital3,138.5 2,717.6 
Retained earnings3,401.1 2,805.3 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(322.2)(247.5)
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities600.3 427.2 
Total equity6,821.3 5,706.2 
Total liabilities and equity$21,403.0 $21,250.4 
See accompanying notes.
174


The Carlyle Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Revenues
Fund management fees$2,030.1 $1,667.5 $1,486.0 
Incentive fees63.7 48.8 37.0 
Investment income
Performance allocations1,327.5 6,084.6 1,635.9 
Principal investment income (loss)570.5 637.3 (540.7)
Total investment income1,898.0 6,721.9 1,095.2 
Interest and other income135.9 90.7 89.6 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds311.0 253.2 226.8 
Total revenues4,438.7 8,782.1 2,934.6 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits1,052.0 908.0 849.6 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation719.9 2,961.0 779.1 
Total compensation and benefits1,925.9 4,032.1 1,733.7 
General, administrative and other expenses575.8 431.7 349.3 
Interest110.4 113.3 94.0 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds211.6 178.5 163.5 
Other non-operating expenses (income)1.0 1.5 (7.2)
Total expenses2,824.7 4,757.1 2,333.3 
Other income (loss)
Net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds(41.5)2.5 (21.3)
Income before provision for income taxes1,572.5 4,027.5 580.0 
Provision for income taxes287.8 982.3 197.2 
Net income1,284.7 3,045.2 382.8 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities59.7 70.5 34.6 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. Common Stockholders$1,225.0 $2,974.7 $348.2 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. per common share (see Note 14)
Basic$3.39 $8.37 $0.99 
Diluted$3.35 $8.20 $0.97 
Weighted-average common shares
Basic361,278,064 355,241,653 350,464,315 
Diluted365,707,722 362,574,564 358,393,802 

Substantially all revenue is earned from affiliates of the Company. See accompanying notes.
175


The Carlyle Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Net income$1,284.7 $3,045.2 $382.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(16.0), $1.2 and $(33.5) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively(107.8)(56.3)49.6 
Unrealized losses on Fortitude available-for-sale securities, net of income tax benefit of $(5.3) for the year ended December 31, 2020 — (20.0)
Defined benefit plans, net
Unrealized net income (loss) for the period, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $4.6, $2.9 and $(2.3) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively14.5 9.5 (9.0)
Less: reclassification adjustment for unrecognized gain during the period included in base compensation expense, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $0.3, $0.7 and $0.6 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively1.0 2.1 1.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(92.3)(44.7)22.4 
Comprehensive income1,192.4 3,000.5 405.2 
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities42.1 64.6 37.6 
Comprehensive income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.$1,150.3 $2,935.9 $367.6 
See accompanying notes.

176


The Carlyle Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollars and shares in millions)
Common
Units
Common SharesPartners’
Capital
Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit)Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesNon-
controlling
Interests in
Carlyle
Holdings
Total
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019117.8 — $703.8 $— $— $— $(85.2)$333.5 $2,017.5 $2,969.6 
Reclassification resulting from Conversion - Partners' Capital(117.8)117.8 (703.8)1.2 702.6 — — — — — 
Reclassification resulting from Conversion - Non-controlling Interest in Carlyle Holdings— 229.4 — 2.3 2,180.9 — (165.7)— (2,017.5)— 
Shares repurchased— (1.1)— — (26.4)— — — — (26.4)
Tax effects resulting from Conversion— — — — (62.9)— 22.8 — — (40.1)
Equity-based compensation— — — — 113.4 — — — — 113.4 
Shares issued for equity-based awards— 7.4 — — — — — — — — 
Contributions— — — — — — — 210.0 210.0 
Distributions— — — — (351.3)— — (77.8)— (429.1)
Net income— — — — — 348.2 — 34.6 — 382.8 
Deconsolidation of Consolidated Entities— — — — (10.1)— — (262.3)— (272.4)
Currency translation adjustments— — — — — — 46.6 3.0 — 49.6 
Unrealized loss on Fortitude available-for-sale securities— — — — — — (20.0)— — (20.0)
Defined benefit plans, net— — — — — — (7.2)— — (7.2)
Balance at December 31, 2020 353.5 $ $3.5 $2,546.2 $348.2 $(208.7)$241.0 $ $2,930.2 














Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollars and shares in millions)
Common SharesCommon
Stock
Additional Paid-in CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit)Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated EntitiesTotal
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2020353.5 $3.5 $2,546.2 $348.2 $(208.7)$241.0 $2,930.2 
Shares repurchased(3.2)  (161.8)  (161.8)
Equity-based compensation 0.1 166.6    166.7 
Shares issued for equity-based awards5.0       
Shares issued for performance allocations0.1  4.8    4.8 
Contributions     216.2 216.2 
Distributions   (355.8) (94.6)(450.4)
Net income   2,974.7  70.5 3,045.2 
Currency translation adjustments    (50.4)(5.9)(56.3)
Defined benefit plans, net    11.6  11.6 
Balance at December 31, 2021355.4 $3.6 $2,717.6 $2,805.3 $(247.5)$427.2 $5,706.2 
Shares repurchased(5.0)$ $ $(185.6)$ $ $(185.6)
Equity-based compensation  162.5    162.5 
Shares issued for equity-based awards6.2       
Shares issued for performance allocations0.9  38.9    38.9 
Shares issued related to the acquisition of CBAM4.2  194.5    194.5 
Shares issued related to the acquisition of Abingworth0.6  25.0    25.0 
Contributions     391.2 391.2 
Distributions   (443.6) (216.8)(660.4)
Net income   1,225.0  59.7 1,284.7 
Deconsolidation of a Consolidated Entity     (47.6)(47.6)
Non-controlling interests related to the acquisition of Abingworth     4.2 4.2 
Currency translation adjustments    (90.2)(17.6)(107.8)
Defined benefit plans, net    15.5  15.5 
Balance at December 31, 2022362.3 $3.6 $3,138.5 $3,401.1 $(322.2)$600.3 $6,821.3 
See accompanying notes.

177

The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income$1,284.7 $3,045.2 $382.8 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization147.4 52.0 52.1 
Right-of-use asset impairment, net of broker fees— 24.8 — 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Non-cash performance allocations and incentive fees, net393.6 (1,670.7)(631.8)
Non-cash principal investment (income) loss(553.4)(618.5)534.4 
Other non-cash amounts(10.3)29.1 (2.9)
Consolidated Funds related:
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on investments of Consolidated Funds408.1 (76.6)29.1 
Realized/unrealized (gain) loss from loans payable of Consolidated Funds(366.6)74.1 (7.8)
Purchases of investments by Consolidated Funds(3,826.2)(5,407.0)(3,140.0)
Proceeds from sale and settlements of investments by Consolidated Funds2,860.4 4,888.7 2,013.8 
Non-cash interest income, net(12.1)(11.8)(8.1)
Change in cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds(61.0)30.3 13.9 
Change in other receivables held at Consolidated Funds19.3 (45.7)(5.4)
Change in other liabilities held at Consolidated Funds(336.8)115.6 220.9 
Other non-cash amounts of Consolidated Funds0.1 — 0.5 
Purchases of investments(629.9)(276.7)(271.3)
Purchase of investment in Fortitude Re— — (79.6)
Proceeds from the sale of investments474.9 668.4 307.5 
Payments of contingent consideration(5.7)(48.0)— 
Changes in deferred taxes, net(73.2)508.4 134.5 
Change in due from affiliates and other receivables(82.5)(25.7)1.9 
Change in deposits and other(11.8)(12.5)(2.0)
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(14.3)105.7 (4.0)
Change in accrued compensation and benefits(135.4)239.0 210.1 
Change in due to affiliates1.7 0.2 (29.2)
Change in lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities(8.8)4.5 (9.8)
Change in deferred revenue4.5 35.1 16.2 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(379.3)1,791.0 (169.2)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of corporate treasury investments(69.6)— — 
Proceeds from corporate treasury investments50.0 — — 
Purchases of fixed assets, net(40.6)(41.4)(61.2)
Purchase of Abingworth, net of cash acquired(150.2)— — 
Purchase of CBAM intangibles and investments(618.4)— — 
Proceeds from sale of MRE, net of cash sold— 5.9 — 
Proceeds from sale of Brazil management entity, net of cash sold— 3.3 — 
Net cash used in investing activities(828.8)(32.2)(61.2)
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings under credit facilities— 70.0 294.1 
Repayments under credit facilities— (70.0)(329.9)
Issuance of 4.625% subordinated notes due 2061, net of financing costs— 484.1 — 
Repurchase of 3.875% senior notes due 2023— (259.9)— 
Proceeds from CLO borrowings, net of financing costs73.2 111.7 20.5 
Payments on CLO borrowings(16.7)(232.5)(3.8)
Net borrowings on loans payable of Consolidated Funds624.2 182.9 704.1 
Payments of contingent consideration— (0.1)(0.3)
Dividends to common stockholders(443.6)(355.8)(351.3)
Payment of deferred consideration for Carlyle Holdings units(68.8)(68.8)(68.8)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders391.2 216.2 210.0 
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders(216.8)(94.6)(77.8)
Common shares issued for performance allocations38.9 4.8 — 
Common shares repurchased(185.6)(161.8)(26.4)
Change in due to/from affiliates financing activities(81.2)(68.7)0.7 
Change in due to/from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds— — (0.8)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities114.8 (242.5)370.3 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes(20.3)(30.8)21.7 
(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1,113.6)1,485.5 161.6 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period2,475.1 989.6 828.0 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Supplemental cash disclosures
Cash paid for interest$91.5 $92.7 $80.1 
Cash paid for income taxes$402.1 $402.6 $35.4 
Supplemental non-cash disclosures
Issuance of common shares related to the acquisition of CBAM and Abingworth$219.5 $— $— 
Tax effects from the conversion to a Corporation recorded in equity$— $— $40.1 
Net asset impact of deconsolidation of Consolidated Funds$(47.7)$(34.4)$(253.6)
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 $987.6 
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 2.0 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds$209.0 $147.8 $148.6 

See accompanying notes.
178

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
unit with    Carlyle is one of the world’s largest global investment firms that deploys private capital across its carrying amount.business through three reportable segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions (see Note 17). In the Global Private Equity segment, Carlyle advises buyout, growth, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds. The impairment charge will then beprimary areas of focus for the amountGlobal Credit segment are liquid credit, illiquid credit, real assets credit, and other credit such as insurance solutions, loan syndication and capital markets. The Global Investment Solutions segment provides investment opportunities and resources for investors and clients through secondary purchases and financing of existing portfolios, managed co-investment programs and primary fund investments. Carlyle typically serves as the general partner, investment manager or collateral manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of these products.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, certain Carlyle-affiliated funds, related co-investment entities and certain CLOs managed by which the carrying amount exceedsCompany (collectively the reporting unit’s fair value. An entity would still“Consolidated Funds”) have been consolidated in the optionaccompanying financial statements pursuant to performaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), as described in Note 3. The consolidation of the Consolidated Funds generally has a qualitative assessmentgross-up effect on assets, liabilities and cash flows, and generally has no effect on the net income attributable to the Company. The economic ownership interests of the other investors in the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (see Note 3).
2. Recent Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company completed several transactions as outlined below.
Acquisition of Abingworth LLP (See Note 4)
On August 1, 2022, the Company acquired Abingworth LLP (“Abingworth”), a life sciences investment firm for a reporting unitbase purchase price of $186.2 million, of which $25.0 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock. Consideration for Abingworth also includes up to $130 million in future incentive payments on the achievement of certain performance targets. The acquisition includes the rights to 15% of performance allocations generated by Abingworth’s two most recent active investment funds, Abingworth Bioventures 8 LP and Abingworth Clinical Co-Development Fund 2 LP.
Fortitude Capital Raise and Strategic Advisory Services Agreement (See Note 6)
In March 2022, the Company raised $2.0 billion in third-party equity capital from certain investors in Carlyle FRL and T&D and committed $100 million from the Company to Carlyle FRL for additional equity capital in Fortitude. In May 2022, Fortitude called $1.1 billion of the capital raise, with the remaining capital expected to be called in 2023. In connection with the capital raise and subsequent funding, the Company’s indirect ownership of Fortitude decreased from 19.9% to 13.5% and is expected to further decrease to 10.5% upon funding the remainder of the capital raise.
On April 1, 2022, the Company entered into a new strategic advisory services agreement with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude through a newly-formed investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C. (“CISM”). Under the agreement, CISM provides Fortitude with certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability.
Acquisition of CLO Management Contracts from CBAM Partners LLC (See Note 4)
On March 21, 2022, the Company acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”) for a purchase price of $812.9 million, of which $194.5 million was settled in newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the acquisition of the CLO management contracts, the Company acquired CLO senior and subordinated notes of $175.9 million, a portion of which is financed through term loans and other financing arrangements.
Acquisition of iStar Triple Net Lease Portfolio (See Note 6)
In March 2022, Carlyle Net Leasing Income, L.P., a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund, acquired a diversified portfolio of triple net leases for an enterprise value of $3 billion, which was funded using $2 billion in debt and $1 billion in equity. The investment fund is not consolidated by the Company and the debt is non-recourse to the Company. Carlyle, as general partner of the investment fund, contributed $200 million as a minority interest balance sheet investment, which is included in the Company’s Global Credit principal equity method investments.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The Company consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”).
The Company evaluates (1) whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, (2) whether the entity is a VIE, and (3) whether the Company’s involvement would make it the primary beneficiary. In evaluating whether the Company holds a variable interest, fees (including management fees, incentive fees and performance allocations) that are customary and commensurate with the level of services provided, and where the Company does not hold other economic interests in the entity that would absorb more than an insignificant amount of the expected losses or returns of the entity, are not considered variable interests. The Company considers all economic interests, including indirect interests, to determine if a fee is considered a variable interest.
For those entities where the quantitative impairment testCompany holds a variable interest, the Company determines whether each of these entities qualifies as a VIE and, if so, whether or not the Company is necessary.the primary beneficiary. The guidanceassessment of whether the entity is effectivea VIE is generally performed qualitatively, which requires judgment. These judgments include: (a) determining whether the equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) evaluating whether the equity holders, as a group, can make decisions that have a significant effect on the economic performance of the entity, (c) determining whether two or more parties’ equity interests should be aggregated, and (d) determining whether the equity investors have proportionate voting rights to their obligations to absorb losses or rights to receive returns from an entity.
For entities that are determined to be VIEs, the Company consolidates those entities where it has concluded it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined as the variable interest holder with (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In evaluating whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by the Company.
As of December 31, 2022, assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the consolidated balance sheets were $7.2 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, assets and liabilities of the consolidated VIEs reflected in the consolidated balance sheets were $6.9 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively. Except to the extent of the consolidated assets of the VIEs, the holders of the consolidated VIEs’ liabilities generally do not have recourse to the Company.
The Company’s Consolidated Funds are primarily CLOs, which are VIEs that issue loans payable that are backed by diversified collateral asset portfolios consisting primarily of loans or structured debt. In exchange for managing the collateral for the Partnership on January 1, 2020CLOs, the Company earns investment management fees, including in some cases subordinated management fees and requirescontingent incentive fees. In cases where the guidanceCompany consolidates the CLOs (primarily because of a retained interest that is significant to be applied using a prospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted.the CLO), those management fees and contingent incentive fees have been eliminated as intercompany transactions. As of December 31, 2022, the Company held $110.6 million of investments in these CLOs which represents its maximum risk of loss. The Partnership does not expect the impact of this guidanceCompany’s investments in these CLOs are generally subordinated to be material.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 clarifies the presentation of restricted cashother interests in the statemententities and entitle the Company to receive a pro rata portion of the residual cash flows, by requiringif any, from the amounts describedentities. Investors in the CLOs have no recourse against the Company for any losses sustained in the CLO structure. The Company’s Consolidated Funds also include certain investment funds in our Global Private Equity segment that are actively fundraising and are accounted for as restricted cash be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. If cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are presented separately on the statement of financial position, a reconciliation of these separate line itemsconsolidated VIEs due to the total cash amount included inCompany providing financing to bridge investment purchases. As of December 31, 2022, the statementCompany held $374.6 million of cash flows will be required either in the footnotes or on the facenotes receivable, including accrued interest, from these investment funds which represents its maximum risk of the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2018 and ASU 2016-18 requires the guidance to be applied using a retrospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted; however, the Partnership will reflect this change in presentation of restricted cash in its first quarter 2018 consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the classification of several discrete cash flow issues, including the treatment of cash distributions from equity method investments. The guidance is effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2018 and ASU 2016-15 requires the guidance to be applied using a retrospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted, provided that all of the amendments for all of the topics are adopted in the same period. The Partnership does not expect the impact of this guidance to its consolidated statements of cash flows to be material.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Accounting for Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326). ASU 2016-13    requires an organization to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Currently, GAAP requires an "incurred loss" methodology that delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Under the new standard, the allowance for credit losses must be deducted from the amortized cost of the financial asset to present the net amount expected to be collected. The income statement will reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. This provision of the guidance requires a modified retrospective transition method and will result in a cumulative-effect adjustment in retained earnings upon adoption. This guidance is effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Partnership is currently assessing the potential impact of this guidance.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-9, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-9 changes certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments to employees. ASU 2016-9 requires the income tax effects of awards to be recognized through the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. Previously, an entity was required to determine for each award whether the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes resulted in either an excess tax benefit or a tax deficiency. Excess tax benefits were recognized in partners’ capital, while tax deficiencies were recognized as an offset to accumulated excess tax benefits or in the income statement. Under ASU 2016-9, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies are required to be recognized as income tax benefit or expense in the income statement. This provision of the guidance is required to be applied prospectively. Additionally, ASU 2016-9 allows an employer to withhold employee shares upon vest up to maximum statutory tax rates without causing an award to be classified as a liability. This provision of the guidance requires a modified retrospective transition method. Finally, the previous equity-based compensation guidance required cost to be measured based on the number of awards that are expected to vest. Under ASU 2016-9, an accounting policy election can be made to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. This guidance was effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2017. The Partnership adopted this guidance on that date by recording an adjustment for the cumulative effect of adoption in partners' capital on January 1, 2017. The impact of the adjustment was not material to total partners' capital.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-2 requires lessees to recognize virtually all of their leases on the balance sheet, by recording a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. The lease liability will be measured at the present value of lease payments and the right-of-use asset will be based on the lease liability value, subject to adjustments. Leases can be classified as either operating leases or finance leases. Operating leases will result in straight-line lease expense, while finance leases will result in front-loaded expense. This guidance is effective for the Partnership on

loss.
199
179


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Entities that do not qualify as VIEs are generally assessed for consolidation as voting interest entities. Under the voting interest entity model, the Company consolidates those entities it controls through a majority voting interest.
January 1, 2019All significant inter-entity transactions and ASU 2016-2balances of entities consolidated have been eliminated.

Investments in Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Company holds variable interests in certain VIEs that are not consolidated because the Company is not the primary beneficiary, including its investments in certain CLOs and certain AlpInvest vehicles, as well as its strategic investment in NGP Management Company, L.L.C. (“NGP Management” and, together with its affiliates, “NGP”). Refer to Note 6 for information on the strategic investment in NGP. The Company’s involvement with such entities is in the form of direct or indirect equity interests and fee arrangements. The maximum exposure to loss represents the loss of assets recognized by the Company relating to its variable interests in these unconsolidated entities. The assets recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets related to the Company’s variable interests in these non-consolidated VIEs were as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Investments$1,124.0 $901.9 
Accrued performance allocations406.0 368.7 
Management fee receivables49.6 27.2 
Total$1,579.6 $1,297.8 
These amounts represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss related to the unconsolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Basis of Accounting
The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management has determined that the Company’s Funds are investment companies under U.S. GAAP for the purposes of financial reporting. U.S. GAAP for an investment company requires the guidanceinvestments to be applied usingrecorded at estimated fair value and the unrealized gains and/or losses in an investment’s fair value are recognized on a modified retrospective method. Early adoption is permitted. current basis in the statements of operations. Additionally, the Funds do not consolidate their majority-owned and controlled investments (the “Portfolio Companies”). In the preparation of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has retained the specialized accounting for the Funds.

All of the investments held and notes issued by the Consolidated Funds are presented at their estimated fair values in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Interest and other income of the Consolidated Funds, interest expense and other expenses of the Consolidated Funds, and net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Use of Estimates
The Partnership is currently assessingpreparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the potential impactreported amounts of this guidance, however, the Partnership's total assets and total liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on itshistorical experiences and other factors, including expectations of future events that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Assumptions and estimates regarding the valuation of investments and their resulting impact on performance allocations and incentive fees involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and these assumptions and estimates may be significant to the consolidated balance sheet will increase upon adoptionfinancial statements and the resulting impact on performance allocations and incentive fees. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.

    Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of this guidance.accounting, under which the purchase price of the acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration obligations that are elements of consideration transferred are
180

The FASB issued ASU 2014-9, Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
recognized as of the acquisition date as part of the fair value transferred in exchange for the acquired business. Acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.

    Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-9”) in May 2014 and subsequently issued several amendments to the standard. ASU 2014-9, and related amendments, provide comprehensive guidance for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. Entities will be able to recognize revenue. Revenue is recognized when the entityCompany transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entityCompany expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidanceASC 606 includes a five-step framework that requires an entity to: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, which includes assessing the collectability of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services transferred to the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The guidance in ASU 2014-9, and the related amendments, is effectiveCompany accounts for the Partnership beginning on January 1, 2018, and the Partnership adopted this guidance on that date.
Upon adoption of ASU 2014-9, performance feesallocations that represent a performance-based capital allocation from fund limited partners to the PartnershipCompany (commonly known as “carried interest”), which comprised over 90% of the Partnership's performance fee revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015) will be accounted for as earnings from financial assets within the scope of ASC 323,Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures, and therefore willare not be in the scope of ASU 2014-9.ASC 606. In accordance with ASC 323, the Partnership will recordCompany records equity method income (losses) as a component of investment income based on the change in ourits proportionate claim on net assets of the investment fund, including performance-based capitalperformance allocations, assuming the investment fund was liquidated as of each reporting date pursuant to each fund'sfund’s governing agreements. The Partnership will apply this changeSee Note 6 for additional information on the components of investments and investment income. Performance fees that do not meet the definition of performance-based capital allocations are in accounting on a full retrospective basis. This change in accounting will result in a reclassification from performance fee revenues to investment income (losses).
The Partnership is currently in the process of implementing ASU 2014-9 and its related amendments. The Partnership does not expect significant changes to our historical pattern of recognizing revenue for management fees and performance fees (both for arrangements within the scope of ASC 323606 and arrangements withinare included in incentive fees in the scopeconsolidated statements of ASU 2014-9). Additionally, whileoperations. The calculation of unrealized performance revenues utilizes investment valuations of the funds’ underlying investments, which are derived using the policies, methodologies and templates prepared by the Company’s valuation group, as described in Note 5, Fair Value Measurement.
While the determination of who is the customer in a contractual arrangement will be made on a contract-by-contract basis, the Partnership expects that the customer will generally be the investment fund for ourthe Company’s significant management and advisory contracts. Also,The customer determination impacts the Company’s analysis of the accounting for contract costs.
Fund Management Fees
The Company provides management services to funds in which it holds a general partner interest or to funds or certain costs incurredportfolio companies with which it has an investment advisory or investment management agreement. The Company considers the performance obligations in its contracts with its funds to be the promise to provide (or to arrange for third parties to provide) investment management services related to the management, policies and operations of the funds.

As it relates to the Company’s performance obligation to provide investment management services, the Company typically satisfies this performance obligation over time as the services are rendered, since the funds simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided as the Company performs the service. The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised services to the funds. Management fees earned from each investment management contract over the contract life represent variable consideration because the consideration the Company is entitled to varies based on fluctuations in the basis for the management fee, for example fund net asset value (“NAV”) or assets under management (“AUM”). Given that the management fee basis is susceptible to market factors outside of the Company’s influence, management fees are constrained and, therefore, estimates of future period management fees are generally not included in the transaction price. Revenue recognized for the investment management services provided is generally the amount determined at the end of the period because that is when the uncertainty for that period is resolved.

For closed-end carry funds in the Global Private Equity and Global Credit segments, management fees generally range from 1.0% to 2.0% of commitments during the fund’s investment period based on limited partners’ capital commitments to the funds. Following the expiration or termination of the investment period, management fees generally are based on the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital and the rate charged may also be reduced. These terms may vary for separately managed accounts, longer-dated carry funds, and other closed-end funds. The Company will receive management fees during a specified period of time, which is generally ten years from the initial closing date, or, in some instances, from the final closing date, but such termination date may be earlier in certain limited circumstances or later if extended for successive one year periods, typically up to a maximum of two years. Depending upon the contracted terms of investment advisory or investment management and related agreements, these fees are generally called semi-annually in advance and are recognized as earned
181

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
over the subsequent six month period. For certain longer-dated carry funds and certain other closed-end funds, management fees are called quarterly over the life of the funds.

Within the Global Credit segment, for CLOs and other structured products, management fees generally range from 0.4% to 0.5% based on the total par amount of assets or the aggregate principal amount of the notes in the CLO and are due quarterly in arrears based on the terms and recognized over the respective period. Management fees for the CLOs and other structured products are governed by indentures and collateral management agreements. The Company will receive management fees for the CLOs until redemption of the securities issued by the CLOs, which is generally five to ten years after issuance. Management fees for the business development companies are due quarterly in arrears at annual rates that range from 1.0% of capital under management to 1.5% of gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents. Management fees for the Interval Fund are due monthly in arrears at the annual rate of 1.0% of the month-end value of the Interval Fund’s net assets. Carlyle Aviation Partners’ funds have varying management fee arrangements depending on the strategy of the particular fund. Under the
strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, the Company earns a recurring management fee based on Fortitude’s
general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability and which is due
quarterly in arrears.

Management fees for the Company’s carry fund vehicles in the Global Investment Solutions segment generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% of the vehicle’s capital commitments during the commitment fee period of the relevant fund. Following the expiration of the commitment fee period, the management fees generally range from 0.25% to 1.0% on (i) the net invested capital; (ii) the lower of cost or net asset value of the capital invested, or (iii) the net asset value for unrealized investments. Management fees for the Global Investment Solutions carry fund vehicles are generally due quarterly in advance and recognized over the related quarter.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, management fee receivables, net of allowances for credit losses, were $236.9 million and $164.5 million, respectively, and are included in due from affiliates and other receivables, net, in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company also provides transaction advisory and portfolio advisory services to the portfolio companies, and where covered by separate contractual agreements, recognizes fees for these services when the performance obligation has been satisfied and collection is reasonably assured. The Company also recognizes underwriting fees from the Company’s loan syndication and capital markets business, Carlyle Global Capital Markets. Fund management fees includes transaction and portfolio advisory fees, as well as capital markets fees, of $106.2 million, $90.7 million and $50.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, net of any offsets as defined in the respective partnership agreements.

Fund management fees exclude the reimbursement of any partnership expenses paid by the Company on behalf of the Carlyle funds pursuant to the limited partnership agreements, including amounts related to the pursuit of actual, proposed, or unconsummated investments, professional fees, expenses associated with the acquisition, holding and disposition of investments, and other fund administrative expenses. For the professional fees that the Company arranges for the investment funds, the Company concluded that the nature of its promise is to arrange for the services to be provided and it does not control the services provided by third parties before they are transferred to the customer. Therefore, the Company concluded it is acting in the capacity of an agent. Accordingly, the reimbursement for these professional fees paid on behalf of the investment funds is presented on a net basis in general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company also incurs certain costs, primarily employee travel and entertainment costs, that were previouslyemployee compensation and systems costs, for which it receives reimbursement from the investment funds in connection with its performance obligation to provide investment and management services. For reimbursable travel, compensation and systems costs, the Company concluded it controls the services provided by its employees and the resources used to develop applicable systems before they are transferred to the customer and therefore is a principal. Accordingly, the reimbursement for these costs incurred by the Company to manage the fund limited partnerships are presented neton a gross basis in ourinterest and other income in the consolidated statements of operations and the expense in general, administrative and other expenses or cash-based compensation and benefits expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

Incentive Fees
In connection with management contracts from certain of its Global Credit funds, the Company is also entitled to receive performance-based incentive fees when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, incentive fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been
182

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
achieved. Incentive fees are variable consideration because they are contingent upon the investment vehicle achieving stipulated investment return hurdles. Investment returns are highly susceptible to market factors outside of the Company’s influence. Accordingly, incentive fees are constrained until all uncertainty is resolved. Estimates of future period incentive fees are generally not included in the transaction price because these estimates are constrained. The transaction price for incentive fees is generally the amount determined at the end of each accounting period to which they relate because that is when the uncertainty for that period is resolved, as these fees are not subject to clawback.

Investment Income (Loss), including Performance Allocations
Investment income (loss) represents the unrealized and realized gains and losses resulting from the Company’s equity method investments, including any associated general partner performance allocations, and other principal investments, including CLOs.

General partner performance allocations consist of the allocation of profits from certain of the funds to which the Company is entitled (commonly known as carried interest). For closed-end carry funds in the Global Private Equity and Global Credit segments, the Company is generally entitled to a 20% allocation (or approximately 2% to 12.5% for most of the Global Investment Solutions segment carry fund vehicles) of the net realized income or gain as a carried interest after returning the invested capital, the allocation of preferred returns of generally 7% to 9% and return of certain fund costs (generally subject to catch-up provisions as set forth in the fund limited partnership agreement). These terms may vary on longer-dated funds, certain credit funds, and external co-investment vehicles. Carried interest is recognized upon appreciation of the funds’ investment values above certain return hurdles set forth in each respective partnership agreement. The Company recognizes revenues attributable to performance allocations based upon the amount that would be due pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were terminated at that date. Accordingly, the amount recognized as investment income for performance allocations reflects the Company’s share of the gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. Because of the inherent uncertainty, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is reasonably possible that the difference could be material.
Carried interest is ultimately realized when: (i) an underlying investment is profitably disposed of, (ii) certain costs borne by the limited partner investors have been reimbursed, (iii) the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return and (iv) the Company has decided to collect carry rather than return additional capital to limited partner investors. Realized carried interest may be required to be returned by the Company in future periods if the fund’s investment values decline below certain levels. When the fair value of a fund’s investments remains constant or falls below certain return hurdles, previously recognized performance allocations are reversed. In all cases, each fund is considered separately in this regard, and for a given fund, performance allocations can never be negative over the life of a fund. If upon a hypothetical liquidation of a fund’s investments at their then current fair values, previously recognized and distributed carried interest would be required to be returned, a liability is established for the potential giveback obligation. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company has accrued $40.9 million and $30.2 million, respectively, for giveback obligations.
Principal investment income (loss) is realized when the Company redeems all or a portion of its investment or when the Company receives or is due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from the Company’s proportionate share of the investee’s unrealized earnings, including changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of unrealized gain (loss) at the time an investment is realized. Principal investment income (loss) also includes the Company’s allocation of earnings from its investment in Fortitude through June 2, 2020 (see Note 6). As it relates to the Company’s investments in NGP (see Note 6), principal investment income includes the related amortization of the basis difference between the Company’s carrying value of its investment and the Company’s share of underlying net assets of the investee, as well as the compensation expense associated with compensatory arrangements provided by the Company to employees of its equity method investee.

Interest Income
Interest income is recognized when earned. For debt securities representing non-investment grade beneficial interests in securitizations, the effective yield is determined based on the estimated cash flows of the security. Changes in the effective yield of these securities due to changes in estimated cash flows are recognized on a prospective basis as adjustments to interest income in future periods. Interest income earned by the Company is included in interest and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Interest income of the Consolidated Funds was $282.3 million, $231.3 million and
183

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
$211.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and is included in interest and other income of Consolidated Funds in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Credit Losses
Under ASU 2016-13, the Company is required to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company assesses the collection risk characteristics of the outstanding amounts in its due from affiliates balance into the following pools of receivables:
Reimbursable fund expenses receivables,
Management fee receivables,
Incentive fee receivables,
Transaction fee receivables,
Portfolio fee receivables, and
Notes receivable.
The Company generally utilizes either historical credit loss information or discounted cash flows to calculate expected credit losses for each pool. The Company’s receivables are predominantly with its investment funds, which have low risk of credit loss based on the Company’s historical experience. Historical credit loss data may be adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including the Company’s expectation of near-term realization based on the liquidity of the affiliated investment funds.
Compensation and Benefits
Cash-based Compensation and Benefits – Cash-based compensation and benefits includes salaries, bonuses (discretionary awards and guaranteed amounts), performance payment arrangements and benefits paid and payable to Carlyle employees. Bonuses are accrued over the service period to which they relate.
Equity-Based Compensation – Compensation expense relating to the issuance of equity-based awards is measured at fair value on the grant date. The compensation expense for awards that vest over a future service period is recognized over the relevant service period on a straight-line basis. The compensation expense for awards that do not require future service is recognized immediately. Cash settled equity-based awards are classified as liabilities and are re-measured at the end of each reporting period. The compensation expense for awards that contain performance conditions is recognized when it is probable that the performance conditions will be presentedachieved; in certain instances, such compensation expense may be recognized prior to the grant date of the award. The compensation expense for awards that contain market conditions is based on a grant-date fair value that factors in the probability that the market conditions will be achieved and is recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis.
Equity-based awards issued to non-employees are generally recognized as general, administrative and other expenses, except to the extent they are recognized as part of the Company’s equity method earnings because they are issued to employees of equity method investees.
The Company recognizes equity-based award forfeitures in the period they occur as a reversal of previously recognized compensation expense. The reduction in compensation expense is determined based on the specific awards forfeited during that period. Furthermore, the Company recognizes all excess tax benefits and deficiencies as income tax benefit or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Performance Allocations and Incentive Fee Related Compensation – A portion of the performance allocations and incentive fees earned is due to employees and advisors of the Company. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the recognition of the related performance allocations and incentive fee revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Accordingly, upon a reversal of performance allocations or incentive fee revenue, the related compensation expense, if any, is also reversed. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had recorded a liability of $3.6 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, related to the portion of accrued performance allocations and incentive fees due to employees and advisors, respectively, which was included in accrued compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
184

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In October 2021, the Company commenced a program under which, at the Company’s discretion, up to 20% of the realized performance allocation related compensation over a threshold amount may be distributed in fully vested newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares issued under the program are accounted for as performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation and do not result in incremental compensation expense. The Company has determined to pause the issuance of shares pursuant to this program.
Income Taxes
The Carlyle Group Inc. is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thus is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes. Prior to the Conversion, The Carlyle Group L.P. was generally organized as a series of pass-through entities and therefore generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes, with the exception of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries which were subject to federal, state, local and foreign corporate income taxes at the entity level. Tax positions taken by the Company are subject to periodic audit by U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxing authorities.
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the period in which the difference is expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period of the change in the provision for income taxes. Further, deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected realization of available net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is recorded on the Company’s gross beginning January 1, 2018. Finally,deferred tax assets when it is “more likely than not” that such asset will not be realized. When evaluating the Partnership will applyrealizability of the modified retrospectiveCompany’s deferred tax assets, all evidence, both positive and negative, is evaluated. Items considered in this analysis include the ability to carry back losses, the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and expectations of future earnings. The Company accounts for the valuation allowance assessment on its deferred tax assets and without regard to the Company’s potential future corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) status. Lastly, the Company accounts for the tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) as incurred and therefore has not recorded deferred taxes related to GILTI on its foreign subsidiaries.
    Under U.S. GAAP for income taxes, the amount of tax benefit to be recognized is the amount of benefit that is “more likely than not” to be sustained upon examination. The Company analyzes its tax filing positions in all of the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as for all open tax years in these jurisdictions. If, based on this analysis, the Company determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist, a liability is established, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in the provision for income taxes. If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax positions would be recorded as a reduction in the provision for income taxes.
Non-controlling Interests
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities represent the component of equity in consolidated entities held by third-party investors. These interests are adjusted for general partner allocations which occur during the reporting period. Any change in ownership of a subsidiary while the controlling financial interest is retained is accounted for as an equity transaction between the controlling and non-controlling interests. Transaction costs incurred in connection with such changes in ownership of a subsidiary are recorded as a direct charge to equity.

Earnings Per Common Share
The Company computes earnings per common share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the common shares of the Company by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. The Company applies the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive weighted-average common shares outstanding for adopting ASU 2014-9 and its related amendments.certain equity-based compensation awards. For certain equity-based compensation awards that contain performance or market conditions, the number of contingently issuable common shares is included in diluted earnings per common share based on the number of common shares, if any, that would be issuable under the terms of the awards if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period, if the result is dilutive.
185

The Carlyle Group Inc.


3. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair Value Measurementof Financial Instruments
The underlying entities that the Company manages and invests in (and in certain cases, consolidates) are primarily investment companies which account for their investments at estimated fair value.
The fair value measurement accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”), establishes a hierarchalhierarchical disclosure framework which ranks the observability of market price inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, the characteristics specific to the financial instrument and the state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices, or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets, will generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.

Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed based on the observability of inputs used in the determination of fair values, as follows:

Level I – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices available in active markets for identical instruments as of the reporting date. The type of financial instruments included in Level Ithis category include unrestricted securities, includingsuch as equities and derivatives, listed in active markets. The PartnershipCompany does not adjust the quoted price for these instruments, even in situations where the PartnershipCompany holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level II – inputs to the valuation methodology are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The typetypes of financial instruments in this category includesinclude less liquid and restricted securities listed in active markets, securities traded in other than active markets, government and agency securities, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on observable inputs.
Level III – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to overall fair value measurement. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. FinancialThe types of financial instruments

200


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


that are included in this category include investments in privately-held entities, non-investment grade residual interests in securitizations, collateralized loan obligations, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given financial instrument is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Partnership’sCompany’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.
In certain cases, debt and equity securities (including corporate treasury investments) are valued on the basis of prices from an orderly transaction between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices, market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments.
The following table summarizes the Partnership’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2017:
(Dollars in millions)Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
Assets       
Investments of Consolidated Funds:       
Equity securities$
 $
 $7.9
 $7.9
Bonds
 
 413.4
 413.4
Loans
 
 4,112.7
 4,112.7
Other
 
 0.3
 0.3
 
 
 4,534.3
 4,534.3
Investments in CLOs and other
 
 405.4
 405.4
Corporate treasury investments       
Bonds
 194.1
 
 194.1
Commercial paper and other
 182.2
 
 182.2
 
 376.3
 
 376.3
Foreign currency forward contracts
 0.4
 
 0.4
Total$
 $376.7
 $4,939.7
 $5,316.4
Liabilities       
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(1)
$
 $
 $4,303.8
 $4,303.8
Contingent consideration
 
 1.0
 1.0
Foreign currency forward contracts
 1.2
 
 1.2
Total$
 $1.2
 $4,304.8
 $4,306.0
(1)Senior and subordinated notes issued by CLO vehicles are classified based on the more observable fair value of the CLO financial assets, less (i) the fair value of any beneficial interests held by the Partnership and (ii) the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services.


201


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The following table summarizes the Partnership’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2016:
(Dollars in millions)Level I Level II Level III Total
Assets       
Investments of Consolidated Funds:       
Equity securities$
 $
 $10.3
 $10.3
Bonds
 
 396.4
 396.4
Loans
 
 3,485.6
 3,485.6
Other
 
 1.4
 1.4
 
 
 3,893.7
 3,893.7
Investments in CLOs and other
 
 152.6
 152.6
Corporate treasury investments

 

 

 

Bonds
 91.3
 
 91.3
Commercial paper and other
 98.9
 
 98.9
 
 190.2
 
 190.2
Foreign currency forward contracts
 2.5
 
 2.5
Total$
 $192.7
 $4,046.3
 $4,239.0
Liabilities       
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(1)
$
 $
 $3,866.3
 $3,866.3
Contingent consideration
 
 1.5
 1.5
Loans payable of a real estate VIE
 
 79.4
 79.4
Foreign currency forward contracts
 10.0
 
 10.0
Total$
 $10.0
 $3,947.2
 $3,957.2
(1)Senior and subordinated notes issued by CLO vehicles are classified based on the more observable fair value of the CLO financial assets, less (i) the fair value of any beneficial interests held by the Partnership and (ii) the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services.
There were no transfers from Level II to Level I during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Investment professionals with responsibility for the underlying investments are responsible for preparing the investment valuations pursuant to the policies, methodologies and templates prepared by the Partnership’s valuation group, which is a team made up of dedicated valuation professionals reporting to the Partnership’s chief accounting officer. The valuation group is responsible for maintaining the Partnership’s valuation policy and related guidance, templates and systems that are designed to be consistent with the guidance found in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. These valuations, inputs and preliminary conclusions are reviewed by the fund accounting teams. The valuations are then reviewed and approved by the respective fund valuation subcommittees, which are comprised of the respective fund head(s), segment head, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer, as well as members of the valuation group. The valuation group compiles the aggregate results and significant matters and presents them for review and approval by the global valuation committee, which is comprised of the Partnership’s co-executive chairman of the board, chairman emeritus, co-chief executive officers, chief risk officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, co-chief investment officer, the business segment heads, and observed by the chief compliance officer, the director of internal audit and the Partnership’s audit committee. Additionally, each quarter a sample of valuations are reviewed by external valuation firms.
In the absence of observable market prices, the PartnershipCompany values its investments and its funds’ investments using valuation methodologies applied on a consistent basis. For some investments little market activity may exist. Management’s determination of fair value is then based on the best information available in the circumstances and may incorporate management’s own assumptions and involvesinvolve a significant degree of judgment, taking into consideration a combination of internal and external factors, including the appropriate risk adjustments for non-performance and liquidity risks. Investments for which market prices are not observable include private

202


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


investments in the equity and debt of operating companies and real estate properties,assets, CLO investments and certain debt positions.CLO loans payable and fund investments. The valuation technique for each of these investments is described below:
Private EquityInvestments in Operating Companies and Real Estate InvestmentsAssets – The fair values of private equity investments in operating companies and real assets are generally determined by reference to the income approach (including the discounted cash flow method and the income capitalization method) and the market approach (including the comparable publicly traded company method and the comparable transaction method). Valuations under these approaches are typically derived by
186

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
reference to investment-specific inputs (such as projected net earnings,cash flows, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), the discounted cash flow method, public market or private transactions, valuations for comparable companies or sales of comparable assets, and other measures which, innet operating income) combined with market-based inputs (such as discount rates, EBITDA multiples and capitalization rates). In many cases the investment-specific inputs are unaudited at the time received. The methods usedManagement may also adjust the market-based inputs to estimate the fair value of real estate investments include the discounted cash flow method and/or capitalization rate (“cap rate”) analysis. Valuations may be derived by reference to observable valuation measures for comparable companies or transactions (e.g., applying a key performance metric of the investment such as EBITDA or net operating income to a relevant valuation multiple or cap rate observed in the range of comparable companies or transactions), adjusted by managementaccount for differences between the subject investment and the referenced comparables, and in some instances by referencecompanies, asset or investments used to option pricing models or other similar models.derive the market-based inputs. Adjustments to observable valuation measures are frequently made upon the initial investment to calibrate the initial investment valuation to industry observable inputs. Such adjustments are made to align the investment to observable industry inputs for differences in size, profitability, projected growth rates, geography, and capital structure, ifand other factors as applicable. The adjustments are then reviewed with each subsequent valuation to assess how the investment has evolved relative to the observable inputs. Additionally, the investment may be subject to certain specific risks and/or development milestones which are also taken into account in the valuation assessment. Option pricing models and similar tools may also be considered but do not currently drive a significant portion of private equityoperating company or real estateasset valuations and are used primarily to value warrants, derivatives, certain restrictions and other atypical investment instruments.
Credit-Oriented Investments – The fair values of credit-oriented investments (including corporate treasury investments) are generally determined on the basis of prices between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices, market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments. Specifically, for investments in distressed debt and corporate loans and bonds, the fair values are generally determined by valuations of comparable investments. In some instances, the PartnershipCompany may utilize other valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method.
CLO Investments and CLO Loans Payable – The PartnershipCompany measures the financial liabilities of its consolidated CLOs based on the fair value of the financial assets of its consolidated CLOs, as the PartnershipCompany believes the fair value of the financial assets are more observable. The fair values of the CLO loan and bond assets are primarily based on quotations from reputable dealers or relevant pricing services. In situations where valuation quotations are unavailable, the assets are valued based on similar securities, market index changes, and other factors. The Partnership corroboratesCompany performs certain procedures to ensure the reliability of the quotations from pricing services eitherfor its CLO assets and CLO structured asset positions, which generally includes corroborating prices with other available pricing data or with its own models.a discounted cash flow analysis. Generally, the loan and bond assets of the CLOs are not activelypublicly traded and are classified as Level III. The fair values of the CLO structured asset positions are determined based on both discounted cash flow analyses and third party quotes. Those analyses consider the position size, liquidity, current financial condition of the CLOs, the third party financing environment, reinvestment rates, recovery lags, discount rates and default forecasts and are compared to broker quotations from market makers and third party dealers.
The PartnershipCompany measures the CLO loan payables held by third party beneficial interest holders on the basis of the fair value of the financial assets of the CLO and the beneficial interests held by the Partnership.Company. The PartnershipCompany continues to measure the CLO loans payable that it holds at fair value based on bothrelevant pricing services or discounted cash flow analyses, and third party quotes, as described above.
Loans Payable of a Real Estate VIE – Prior to September 30, 2017, the Partnership elected the fair value option to measure the loans payable of a real estate VIE at fair value. The fair values of the loans were primarily based on discounted cash flow analyses, which considered the liquidity and current financial condition of the real estate VIE. These loans were classified as Level III.
Fund Investments – The Partnership’sCompany’s primary and secondary investments in external funds are valued based on its proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. The terms of the investments generally preclude the ability to redeem the investment. Distributions from these investments will be received as the underlying assets in the funds are liquidated, the timing of which cannot be readily determined.

Investment professionals with responsibility for the underlying investments are responsible for preparing the investment valuations pursuant to the policies, methodologies and templates prepared by the Company’s valuation group, which is a team made up of dedicated valuation professionals reporting to the Company’s chief accounting officer. The valuation group is responsible for maintaining the Company’s valuation policy and related guidance, templates and systems that are designed to be consistent with the guidance found in ASC 820. These valuations, inputs and preliminary conclusions are reviewed by the fund accounting teams. The valuations are then reviewed and approved by the respective fund valuation subcommittees, which include the respective fund head(s), segment head, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer, as well as members of the valuation group. The valuation group compiles the aggregate results and significant matters and presents them for review and approval by the global valuation committee, which includes the Company’s chief executive officer, chief risk officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, and the business segment heads, and observed by the
203
187


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

chief compliance officer, the director of internal audit, the Company’s audit committee and others. Additionally, each quarter a sample of valuations are reviewed by external valuation firms. Valuations of the funds’ investments are used in the calculation of accrued performance allocations, or “carried interest.”
Investments, at Fair Value
Investments include (i) the Company’s ownership interests (typically general partner interests) in the Funds, (ii) strategic investments in Fortitude and NGP made by the Company (both of which are accounted for as equity method investments), (iii) the investments held by the Consolidated Funds (which are presented at fair value in the Company’s consolidated financial statements), and (iv) certain credit-oriented investments, including investments in the CLOs and the preferred securities of Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (“CSL,” formerly known as “TCG BDC, Inc.,” the preferred securities of which are referred to as the “BDC Preferred Shares”) (which are accounted for as trading securities).

Upon the sale of a security or other investment, the realized net gain or loss is computed on a weighted average cost basis, with the exception of the investments held by the CLOs, which compute the realized net gain or loss on a first in, first out basis. Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.

Equity Method Investments
The Company accounts for all investments in which it has or is otherwise presumed to have significant influence, including investments in the unconsolidated Funds and strategic investments, using the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of equity method investments is determined based on amounts invested by the Company, adjusted for the equity in earnings or losses of the investee (including performance allocations) allocated based on the respective partnership agreement, less distributions received. The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held at banks and cash held for distributions, including investments with original maturities of less than three months when purchased.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Held at Consolidated Funds
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds consists of cash and cash equivalents held by the Consolidated Funds, which, although not legally restricted, is not available to fund the general liquidity needs of the Company.

Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily represents cash held by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries due to certain government regulatory capital requirements as well as certain amounts held on behalf of Carlyle funds.
Corporate Treasury Investments
Corporate treasury investments represent investments in U.S. Treasury and government agency obligations,
commercial paper, certificates of deposit, other investment grade securities and other investments with original maturities of
greater than three months when purchased. These investments are accounted for as trading securities in which changes in the
fair value of each investment are recorded through investment income (loss). Any interest earned on debt investments is
recorded through interest and other income.
Derivative Instruments
    The Company uses derivative instruments primarily to reduce its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for all derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
As it relates to certain European CLOs sponsored by the Company, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions. The Company provides securities to counterparties to collateralize amounts borrowed under repurchase agreements on terms that permit the counterparties to
188

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

repledge or resell the securities to others. As of December 31, 2022, $284.4 million of securities were transferred to counterparties under repurchase agreements and are included within investments in the consolidated balance sheets. Cash received under repurchase agreements is recognized as a liability within debt obligations in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 for additional information.

Fixed Assets
Fixed assets consist of furniture, fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements, and computer hardware and software and are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements are the lesser of the lease terms or the life of the asset, and three to seven years for other fixed assets. Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Leases
The Company accounts for its leases in accordance with ASU 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842), and recognizes a lease liability and right-of-use asset in the consolidated balance sheet for contracts that it determines are leases or contain a lease. The Company’s leases primarily consist of operating leases for office space in various countries around the world. The Company also has operating leases for office equipment and vehicles, which are not significant. The Company does not separate non-lease components from lease components for its office space and equipment operating leases and instead accounts for each separate lease component and its associated non-lease component as a single lease component. Right-of-use assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the leases. The Company’s right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Lease right-of-use assets include initial direct costs incurred by the Company and are presented net of deferred rent and lease incentives. Absent an implicit interest rate in the lease, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate, adjusted for the effects of collateralization, based on the information available at commencement in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise those options. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease right-of-use assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
The Company does not recognize a lease liability or right-of-use asset on the balance sheet for short-term leases. Instead, the Company recognizes short-term lease payments as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. A short-term lease is defined as a lease that, at the commencement date, has a lease term of 12 months or less and does not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. When determining whether a lease qualifies as a short-term lease, the Company evaluates the lease term and the purchase option in the same manner as all other leases.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Company’s intangible assets consist of acquired contractual rights to earn future fee income, including management and advisory fees, customer relationships, and acquired trademarks. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from four to eight years, and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired and is recorded in the functional currency of the acquired entity. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and between annual tests when events and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents management fees and other revenue received prior to the balance sheet date, which has not yet been earned. Deferred revenue also includes transaction and portfolio advisory fees received by the Company that are
required to offset fund management fees pursuant to the related fund agreements. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the balance was primarily comprised of transaction and portfolio advisory fees required to offset fund management fees.
189

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments and gains and losses on defined benefit plans sponsored by AlpInvest. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Currency translation adjustments$(322.0)$(231.8)
Unrealized losses on defined benefit plans(0.2)(15.7)
Total$(322.2)$(247.5)
Foreign Currency Translation
Non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are translated at period-end rates of exchange, and the consolidated statements of operations are translated at rates of exchange in effect throughout the period. Foreign currency gains (losses) resulting from transactions outside of the functional currency of an entity of $25.2 million, $(13.5) million and $8.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, are included in general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all accounting standard updates (“ASU”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or expected to have minimal impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.The amendments in this update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope, to clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of reference rate reform. An entity may elect to adopt the amendments in ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01 at any time after March 12, 2020 but no later than December 31, 2022. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging transactions as of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The Company does not expect this guidance to impact its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, which modifies ASC 805 to require an acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606. At the acquisition date, an acquirer should account for the related revenue contracts in accordance with Topic 606 as if it had originated the contracts. Under current GAAP, an acquirer generally recognizes such items at fair value on the acquisition date. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance on July 1, 2022, and applied the guidance prospectively to business combinations that occurred after this date. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions. The amendments in this update clarify the guidance in Topic 820 when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to contractual sale restrictions and introduce new disclosure requirements related to such equity securities. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the impact of this guidance to be material to its consolidated financial statements.
190

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
4. Acquisitions
Abingworth Acquisition
On August 1, 2022, the Company acquired 100% of the equity interests in Abingworth, a London-based life sciences investment firm. Abingworth has $2 billion in assets under management and is included in the Company’s Global Private Equity business segment. The purchase price consisted of $161.2 million in cash and approximately 0.6 million newly issued, fully vested common shares ($25.0 million based on the value of the shares at closing). The transaction also included an earn-out of up to $130.0 million that is payable upon the achievement of certain revenue and earnings performance targets during 2023 through 2028, which will be accounted for as compensation expense. The Company consolidated the financial position and results of operations of Abingworth effective August 1, 2022 and accounted for this transaction as a business combination. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $7.7 million of acquisition costs that are reflected in general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date are as follows (Dollars in millions):
Acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred
Cash$161.2 
Shares of common stock (see Note 15)25.0 
Total consideration transferred$186.2 
Estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Cash and receivables$11.0 
Investments in Abingworth funds3.8 
Lease right-of-use assets, fixed assets, and other assets, net3.7 
Deferred tax assets6.4 
Finite-lived intangible assets88.0 
Goodwill91.1 
Lease liabilities(2.7)
Accrued expenses, accrued compensation and benefits, and other liabilities(10.9)
Non-controlling interests in Abingworth entities(1)
(4.2)
Total$186.2 
(1)    Represents assets held by Abingworth entities which are consolidated VIEs. These assets are attributable to employees and are therefore reflected as non-controlling interests, and include investments in funds in which the Company did not acquire direct economic interests, which are presented as investments in Abingworth funds above.
The finite-lived intangible assets, which related to management contracts and customer relationships, are amortized using the straight-line method over a period ranging from five to eight years.
The amount of revenue and earnings of Abingworth since the acquisition date and the pro forma impact to the Company’s consolidated financial results for the year ended December 31, 2021 as if the acquisition had been consummated as of January 1, 2021, was not significant.
Acquisition of CLO Management Contracts from CBAM Partners LLC
On March 21, 2022, the Company acquired the management contracts related to a portfolio of assets primarily comprised of U.S. and European CLOs as well as other assets across private credit from CBAM Partners LLC (“CBAM”). The purchase price of $812.9 million consisted of a combination of $618.4 million in cash, including approximately $3.4 million of acquisition costs incurred by the Company in connection with the transaction, and approximately 4.2 million newly issued, fully vested common shares ($194.5 million based on the value of the shares at closing).
In connection with the acquisition of the CLO management contracts, the Company acquired CLO senior and subordinated notes of $175.9 million. A portion of these CLO investments is financed through term loans and other financing arrangements with financial institutions, which are secured by the Company’s investments in the respective CLO, have a general unsecured interest in the Carlyle entity that manages the CLO, and generally do not have recourse to any other Carlyle entity (see Note 8).
191

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
This transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition and the acquired contractual rights of $794.3 million are finite-lived intangible assets. The finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of primarily seven years, which reflects the Company’s assumptions regarding resets of the CLOs and extension of the CLO management contracts.
The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred and the allocation of cost to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date are as follows (Dollars in millions):
Acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred
Cash$618.4 
Shares of common stock (see Note 15)194.5 
Total consideration transferred$812.9 
Allocation of cost to assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Acquired contractual rights$794.3 
Acquired CLO senior and subordinated notes175.9 
Assumed CLO borrowings outstanding (see Note 8)(157.3)
Total cost of assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed$812.9 

5. Fair Value Measurement
The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the fair value hierarchy levels disclosed in Note 3 as of December 31, 2022:
Level ILevel IILevel IIITotal
Assets(Dollars in millions)
Investments of Consolidated Funds:
Equity securities(1)
$ $ $430.6 $430.6 
Bonds  594.9 594.9 
Loans  5,352.9 5,352.9 
  6,378.4 6,378.4 
Investments in CLOs  526.1 526.1 
Other investments(2)
1.6 41.6 79.4 122.6 
Corporate treasury investments:
Commercial paper and other 20.0  20.0 
 20.0  20.0 
Foreign currency forward contracts 2.2  2.2 
Subtotal$1.6 $63.8 $6,983.9 $7,049.3 
Investments measured at net asset value(3)
528.5 
Total$7,577.8 
Liabilities
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(4)
$ $ $5,491.6 $5,491.6 
Foreign currency forward contracts 3.2  3.2 
Total(5)
$ $3.2 $5,491.6 $5,494.8 
(1)This balance includes $377.4 million related to investments that have been bridged by the Company to investment funds that are actively fundraising and are accounted for as consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2022.
(2)The Level III balance excludes $58.2 million related to two corporate investments in equity securities which the Company has elected to account for under the measurement alternative for equity securities without readily determinable fair values pursuant to ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities. As a non-recurring fair value measurement, the fair value of these equity securities is excluded from the tabular Level III rollforward disclosures.
(3)Balance represents Fund Investments that the Company reports based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days, of which $516.0 million relates to investments of Consolidated Funds.
192

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(4)Senior and subordinated notes issued by CLO vehicles are valued based on the more observable fair value of the CLO financial assets, less (i) the fair value of any beneficial interest held by the Company and (ii) the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services.
(5)Total liabilities balance excludes $235.6 million of senior notes measured at amortized cost and a $178.0 million revolving credit balance, both related to loans payable of Consolidated Funds.
The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2021:
Level ILevel IILevel IIITotal
Assets(Dollars in millions)
Investments of Consolidated Funds:
Equity securities$— $— $17.9 $17.9 
Bonds— — 599.5 599.5 
Loans— — 5,898.1 5,898.1 
— — 6,515.5 6,515.5 
Investments in CLOs— — 361.1 361.1 
Other investments(1)
1.5 45.6 78.7 125.8 
Foreign currency forward contracts— 1.4 — 1.4 
Subtotal$1.5 $47.0 $6,955.3 $7,003.8 
Investments measured at net asset value(2)
161.7 
Total$7,165.5 
Liabilities
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds(3)
$— $— $5,811.0 $5,811.0 
Foreign currency forward contracts— 0.7 — 0.7 
Total(4)
$— $0.7 $5,811.0 $5,811.7 
 (1) The Level III balance excludes a corporate investment in equity securities which the Company has elected to account for under the measurement alternative for equity securities without readily determinable fair values pursuant to ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities. In December 2021, the Company remeasured this investment to a fair value of $54.9 million due to an observable price change. As a non-recurring fair value measurement, the fair value of these equity securities is excluded from the tabular Level III rollforward disclosures.
(2) Balance represents Fund Investments that the Company reports based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days, of which $145.5 million relates to investments of Consolidated Funds.
(3) Senior and subordinated notes issued by CLO vehicles are valued based on the more observable fair value of the CLO financial assets, less (i) the fair value of any beneficial interests held by the Company and (ii) the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services.
(4) Total liabilities balance excludes a $79.0 million revolving credit balance related to loans payable of Consolidated Funds.

193

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The changes in financial instruments measured at fair value for which the PartnershipCompany has used Level III inputs to determine fair value are as follows (Dollars in millions):
 Financial Assets Year Ended December 31, 2022
Investments of Consolidated FundsInvestments in CLOsTotal
Equity
securities
BondsLoansOther investments
Balance, beginning of period$17.9 $599.5 $5,898.1 $361.1 $78.7 $6,955.3 
Deconsolidation/consolidation of funds (1)
(47.7)    (47.7)
Purchases486.5 515.4 2,485.0 263.4 0.9 3,751.2 
Sales and distributions(14.5)(419.6)(1,738.7)(41.9)(4.7)(2,219.4)
Settlements (1.6)(649.8)  (651.4)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses), net
Included in earnings(10.9)(60.5)(392.7)(25.6)4.5 (485.2)
Included in other comprehensive income(0.7)(38.3)(249.0)(30.9) (318.9)
Balance, end of period$430.6 $594.9 $5,352.9 $526.1 $79.4 $6,983.9 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings related to financial assets still held at the reporting date$(16.4)$(56.9)$(380.6)$(25.6)$1.0 $(478.5)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income related to financial assets still held at the reporting date$(0.6)$(16.5)$(162.5)$(30.9)$ $(210.5)

 Financial Assets Year Ended December 31, 2017
Investments of Consolidated Funds Investments in CLOs and other Total
Equity
securities
 Bonds Loans Other 
Balance, beginning of period$10.3
 $396.4
 $3,485.6
 $1.4
 $152.6
 $4,046.3
Purchases0.1
 280.6
 2,594.3
 
 255.8
 3,130.8
Sales and distributions(27.0) (310.9) (1,223.9) (3.0) (28.2) (1,593.0)
Settlements
 
 (1,084.1) 
 
 (1,084.1)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses), net           
Included in earnings23.5
 (7.5) 16.6
 1.7
 12.2
 46.5
Included in other comprehensive income1.0
 54.8
 324.2
 0.2
 13.0
 393.2
Balance, end of period$7.9
 $413.4
 $4,112.7
 $0.3
 $405.4
 $4,939.7
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings related to financial assets still held at the reporting date$6.7
 $(5.0) $18.5
 $
 $11.3
 $31.5

Financial Assets Year Ended December 31, 2016 Financial Assets Year Ended December 31, 2021
Investments of Consolidated Funds Investments in CLOs and other Restricted
securities of
Consolidated
Funds
 Total Investments of Consolidated FundsInvestments in CLOsTotal
Equity
securities
 Bonds Loans 
Partnership
and LLC
interests
(2)
 Other  Equity
securities
BondsLoansOther investments
Balance, beginning of period$575.3
 $1,180.9
 $15,686.7
 $59.6
 $5.0
 $1.4
 $8.7
 $17,517.6
Balance, beginning of period$9.4 $550.4 $5,497.1 $489.4 $81.4 $6,627.7 
Deconsolidation of funds(1)
(562.1) (890.7) (13,506.9) (74.3) (5.0) 123.8
 (8.7) (14,923.9)
Deconsolidation/consolidation of funds(2)
Deconsolidation/consolidation of funds(2)
5.7 — 314.2 23.1 — 343.0 
Purchases12.2
 268.8
 2,446.7
 12.4
 
 25.9
 
 2,766.0
Purchases0.5 729.6 4,530.6 102.4 0.7 5,363.8 
Sales and distributions(5.1) (152.0) (356.7) 
 
 (7.8) 
 (521.6)Sales and distributions(4.0)(629.1)(2,903.5)(250.9)(17.8)(3,805.3)
Settlements
 
 (771.1) 
 
 
 
 (771.1)Settlements— (3.8)(1,346.8)— — (1,350.6)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses), net               Realized and unrealized gains (losses), net
Included in earnings(9.7) 4.3
 52.7
 2.3
 1.5
 29.1
 
 80.2
Included in earnings7.0 (7.5)88.0 (0.8)14.4 101.1 
Included in other comprehensive(0.3) (14.9) (65.8) 
 (0.1) (19.8) 
 (100.9)Included in other comprehensive(0.7)(40.1)(281.5)(2.1)— (324.4)
Balance, end of period$10.3
 $396.4
 $3,485.6
 $
 $1.4
 $152.6
 $
 $4,046.3
Balance, end of period$17.9 $599.5 $5,898.1 $361.1 $78.7 $6,955.3 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings related to financial assets still held at the reporting date$(9.5) $2.8
 $41.2
 $
 $1.5
 $29.1
 $
 $65.1
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings related to financial assets still held at the reporting date$4.4 $(0.9)$30.1 $(1.2)$14.6 $47.0 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income related to financial assets still held at the reporting dateChanges in unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income related to financial assets still held at the reporting date$(0.4)$(13.9)$(155.7)$(2.1)$— $(172.1)
 
(1)As a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-2 and the deconsolidation of certain CLOs on January 1, 2016, $123.8 million of investments that the Partnership held in those CLOs were no longer eliminated in consolidation and were included in investments in CLOs and other for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(2)As a result of the retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-7, the beginning balance of Partnership and LLC interests that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share practical expedient have been revised to reflect their exclusion from the fair value hierarchy.

 (1) As a result of the deconsolidation of one fund during the year ended December 31, 2022.

(2) As a result of the consolidation of two CLOs during the year ended December 31, 2021, the investments that the Company held in these CLOs are now eliminated in consolidation and no longer included in investments in CLOs. As a result of the deconsolidation of one CLO during the year ended December 31, 2021, the investment that the Company held in that CLO is no longer eliminated in consolidation and is now included in investments in CLOs.



204
194


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


 Financial Liabilities Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Loans Payable
of Consolidated
Funds
 Contingent
Consideration
 Loans Payable of
a real estate VIE
 Total
Balance, beginning of period$3,866.3
 $1.5
 $79.4
 $3,947.2
Borrowings2,314.3
 
 
 2,314.3
Paydowns(2,167.1) (0.7) (14.3) (2,182.1)
Deconsolidation of a real estate VIE
 
 (72.6) (72.6)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses, net       
Included in earnings(61.5) 0.1
 3.3
 (58.1)
Included in other comprehensive income351.8
 0.1
 4.2
 356.1
Balance, end of period$4,303.8
 $1.0
 $
 $4,304.8
Changes in unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings related to financial liabilities still held at the reporting date$(57.0) $0.1
 $
 $(56.9)
Financial Liabilities
Loans Payable of Consolidated Funds
Financial Liabilities Year Ended December 31, 2016Year Ended December 31,
Loans Payable
of Consolidated
Funds
 Derivative
Instruments of
Consolidated
Funds
 Contingent
Consideration
 Loans Payable of
a consolidated
real estate VIE
 Total 20222021
Balance, beginning of period$17,046.7
 $29.1
 $20.8
 $75.4
 $17,172.0
Balance, beginning of period$5,811.0 $5,563.0 
Initial consolidation/deconsolidation of funds(13,742.6) (29.0) 
 
 (13,771.6)
Deconsolidation/consolidation of fundsDeconsolidation/consolidation of funds 360.8 
Borrowings1,336.7
 
 
 
 1,336.7
Borrowings1,603.1 3,197.9 
Paydowns(742.5) 
 (10.3) (34.5) (787.3)Paydowns(421.0)(2,223.2)
Sales
 (1.7) 
 
 (1.7)Sales(892.4)(870.9)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses, net         Realized and unrealized (gains) losses, net
Included in earnings40.4
 1.6
 (9.0) 19.8
 52.8
Included in earnings(366.6)74.1 
Included in other comprehensive income(72.4) 
 
 18.7
 (53.7)Included in other comprehensive income(242.5)(290.7)
Balance, end of period$3,866.3
 $
 $1.5
 $79.4
 $3,947.2
Balance, end of period$5,491.6 $5,811.0 
Changes in unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings related to financial liabilities still held at the reporting date$37.6
 $
 $(0.1) $19.8
 $57.3
Changes in unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings related to financial liabilities still held at the reporting date$(364.2)$66.7 
Changes in unrealized (gains) losses included in other comprehensive income related to financial liabilities still held at the reporting dateChanges in unrealized (gains) losses included in other comprehensive income related to financial liabilities still held at the reporting date$(239.6)$(270.6)
 
Realized and unrealized gains and losses included in earnings for Level III investments for investments in CLOs and other investments are included in investment income (loss), and such gains and losses for investments of Consolidated Funds and loans payable and derivative instruments of the CLOsConsolidated Funds are included in net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds in the consolidated statements of operations.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses included in earnings for Level III contingent consideration liabilities are included in other non-operating expense (income), and such gains and losses for loans payable of a real estate VIE are included in interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE in the consolidated statement of operations.
Gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for all Level III financial asset and liabilities are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and non-controlling interests in consolidated entities and non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings in the consolidated balance sheets.entities.


 



205
195


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




The following table summarizes quantitative information about the Partnership’sCompany’s Level III inputs as of December 31, 2017:2022:
Fair Value atRange
(Weighted
Average)
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2022Valuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input(s)
Assets
Investments of Consolidated Funds:
Equity securities$3.1Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes ($ per share)0.00 - 4.73 (0.18)
363.5Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rates10% - 10% (10%)
Terminal Growth Rate0% - 7% ((5%))
Comparable MultipleEBITDA Multiple12.7x - 12.7x (12.7x)
TCF Multiple23.8x - 23.8x (23.8x)
64.0
Other(1)
N/AN/A
Bonds594.9Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)46 - 105 (88)
Loans5,043.4Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)0 - 100 (91)
11.8Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rates0% - 9% (1%)
248.7Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rates7% - 10% (8%)
37.4Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)97% - 98% (97%)
11.1Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)91% - 91% (91%)
0.5
Other(1)
N/AN/A
6,378.4
Investments in CLOs and other
Senior secured notes462.1Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)67 - 100 (93)
Discount Margins (Basis Points)170 - 1,800 (386)
Default Rates2% - 3% (2%)
Recovery Rates50% - 70% (60%)
Subordinated notes and preferred shares64.0Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)0 - 82 (40)
Discount Rate15% - 25% (20%)
Default Rates2% - 3% (2%)
Recovery Rates50% - 70% (60%)
Other investments:
BDC preferred shares76.9Market Yield AnalysisMarket Yields11% - 11% (11%)
Aviation subordinated notes2.5Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rates21% - 21% (21%)
Total$6,983.9
Liabilities
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds:
Senior secured notes$5,303.3
Other(2)
N/AN/A
Subordinated notes and preferred shares188.3Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)21 - 96 (38)
Discount Rates15% - 25% (20%)
Default Rates2% - 3% (3%)
Recovery Rates50% - 70% (60%)
Total$5,491.6
 Fair Value at     Range
(Weighted
Average)
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2017 Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input(s) 
Assets       
Investments of Consolidated Funds:       
Equity securities$5.7
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rates 10% - 10% (10%)
 

 
 
 
 2.2
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes
($ per share)
 0 - 33 (30)
   
 
 
Bonds413.4
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 44 - 107 (98)
Loans4,112.7
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 64 - 103 (100)
Other0.3
 Counterparty Pricing Indicative Quotes
(% of Notional Amount)
 9 - 9 (9)
 4,534.3
 
 
 
Investments in CLOs and other  
 
 
Senior secured notes357.2
 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus Pricing Discount Rate 1% - 9% (3%)
   
 Default Rates 1% - 3% (2%)
   
 Recovery Rates 50% - 70% (60%)
   
 Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 98 - 104 (101)
Subordinated notes and preferred shares48.2
 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus Pricing Discount Rate 8% - 11% (9%)
   
 Default Rates 1% - 3% (2%)
   
 Recovery Rates 50% - 70% (60%)
   
 Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 63 - 97 (81)
Total$4,939.7
 
 
 
Liabilities  
 
 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds:  
 
 
Senior secured notes$4,100.5
 Other N/A N/A
Subordinated notes and preferred shares26.9
 Other N/A N/A
 176.4
 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus Pricing Discount Rates  8% - 11% (10%)
   
 Default Rates 1% - 3% (2%)
   
 Recovery Rates  50% - 70% (60%)
   
 Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 79 - 93 (86)
Contingent consideration1.0
 Other N/A N/A
Total$4,304.8
      


(1) Fair value approximates transaction price that was in close proximity to the reporting date.

(2) Senior and subordinated notes issued by CLO vehicles are classified based on the more observable fair value of the CLO financial assets, less (i) the fair value of any beneficial interests held by the Company and (ii) the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services.










206
196


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The following table summarizes quantitative information about the Partnership’sCompany’s Level III inputs as of December 31, 2016:2021:
(Dollars in millions)Fair Value at
December 31, 2016
 Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input(s) Range
(Weighted
Average)
Assets       
Investments of Consolidated Funds:       
Equity securities$9.6
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rates 9% - 10% (9%)
   
 Exit Cap Rate 7% - 9% (7%)
 0.7
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes
($ per share)
 10 - 10 (10)
   
 
 
Bonds396.4
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 74 - 108 (99)
Loans3,485.6
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 31 - 102 (99)
Other1.4
 Counterparty Pricing Indicative Quotes
(% of Notional Amount)
 6 - 8 (7)
 3,893.7
 
 
 
Senior secured notes115.9
 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus Pricing Discount Rate 1% - 11% (2%)
   
 Default Rates 1% - 3% (2%)
   
 Recovery Rates 50% - 74% (71%)
   
 Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 82 - 102 (99)
Subordinated notes and preferred shares35.4
 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus Pricing Discount Rate 9% - 14% (12%)
   
 Default Rates 1% - 10% (2%)
   
 Recovery Rates 50% - 74% (64%)
   
 Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 2 - 101 (96)
Other1.3
 Comparable Multiple LTM EBITDA Multiple 5.7x - 5.7x (5.7x)
Total$4,046.3
 
 
 
Liabilities  
 
 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds:  
 
 
Senior secured notes(1)
3,672.5
 Other N/A N/A
Subordinated notes and preferred shares(1)
26.9
 Other N/A N/A
 166.9
 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus Pricing Discount Rates 9% - 14% (12%)
   
 Default Rates  1% - 3% (2%)
   
 Recovery Rates  50% - 74% (66%)
   
 Indicative Quotes (% of Par) 7 - 90 (68)
Loans payable of a real estate VIE79.4
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount to Expected Payment 10% - 55% (37%)
   
 Discount Rate 20% - 30% (23%)
Contingent consideration1.5
 Other N/A N/A
Total$3,947.2
      
(1)Beginning on January 1, 2016, CLO loan payables held by third party beneficial interest holders are measured on the basisFair Value atRange
(Weighted
Average)
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2021Valuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input(s)
Assets
Investments of fair valueConsolidated Funds:
Equity securities$17.9 Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes
($ per share)
0.00 - 84.22 (0.63)
Bonds599.5 Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of the financial assetsPar)93 - 107 (99)
Loans5,766.0 Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of thePar)35 - 106 (98)
65.1 Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rates4% - 8% (5%)
67.0 Market Yield AnalysisMarket Yields3% - 8% (5%)
6,515.5 
Investments in CLOs and the beneficial interests held by the Partnership.other
Senior secured notes289.7 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)86 - 101 (99)
Discount Margins (Basis Points)50 - 1,330 (245)
Default Rates1% - 2% (1%)
Recovery Rates50% - 70% (60%)
Subordinated notes and preferred shares71.5 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)46 - 97 (63)
Discount Rates14% - 22% (19%)
Default Rates1% - 2% (1%)
Recovery Rates50% - 70% (60%)
BDC preferred shares72.5 Market Yield AnalysisMarket Yields7% - 7% (7%)
Aviation subordinated notes6.1 Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rates18% - 18% (18%)
Total$6,955.3 
Liabilities
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds:
Senior secured notes$5,561.1 
Other(1)
N/AN/A
Subordinated notes and preferred shares249.9 Discounted Cash Flow with Consensus PricingIndicative Quotes (% of Par)40 - 97 (61)
Discount Rates14% - 22% (19%)
Default Rates1% - 2% (1%)
Recovery Rates50% - 70% (60%)
Total$5,811.0 

(1) Senior and subordinated notes issued by CLO vehicles are classified based on the more observable fair value of the CLO financial assets, less (i) the fair value of any beneficial interests held by the Company and (ii) the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investments in equity securities include indicative quotes, discount rates and exit cap rates. Significant decreases in indicative quotes in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant increases in discount rates and exit cap rates in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

207


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investments in bonds and loansCompany’s consolidated funds are indicative quotes. Significant decreases in indicative quotes in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Partnership’sCompany’s investments in CLOs and other investments include EBITDA multiples,indicative quotes, discount margins, discount rates, default rates, and recovery rates and indicative quotes.rates. Significant
197

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
decreases in EBITDA multiples, recovery rates or indicative quotes in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant increases in discount margins, discount rates or default rates in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Partnership’sCompany’s loans payable of Consolidated Funds are discount rates, default rates, recovery rates and indicative quotes. Significant increases in discount rates or default rates in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement, while a significant increasemeasurement. Significant decreases in recovery rates andor indicative quotes in isolation would result in a significantly higherlower fair value.value measurement.


4.6. Investments
Investments consist of the following:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Accrued performance allocations$7,117.7 $8,133.0 
Principal equity method investments, excluding performance allocations2,922.0 2,128.6 
Principal investments in CLOs526.1 361.1 
Other investments202.1 209.3 
Total investments$10,767.9 $10,832.0 

    Accrued Performance FeesAllocations
The components of accrued performance feesallocations are as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$5,577.1 $6,412.8 
Global Credit193.9 300.3 
Global Investment Solutions(1)
1,346.7 1,419.9 
Total$7,117.7 $8,133.0 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$2,272.4
 $1,375.4
Real Assets657.5
 483.4
Global Credit56.1
 68.6
Investment Solutions684.6
 553.7
Total$3,670.6
 $2,481.1
(1) The Company’s primary and secondary investments in external funds are generally valued based on its proportionate share of the net assets provided by the third party general partners of the underlying fund partnerships based on the most recent available information which typically has a lag of up to 90 days. As a result, amounts presented may not include the impact of economic activity in the current quarter.
Approximately 19%13% of accrued performance feesallocations at December 31, 20172022 are related to Carlyle Partners VI, L.P., one of the Partnership’s CorporateCompany’s Global Private Equity funds.
Approximately 27%25% of accrued performance feesallocations at December 31, 20162021 are related to Carlyle Partners V, L.P. and Carlyle Asia Partners III,VI, L.P., twoone of the Partnership’s CorporateCompany’s Global Private Equity funds.
198

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Accrued performance feesallocations are shown gross of the Partnership’sCompany’s accrued performance allocations and incentive fee-related compensation (see Note 8)9), and accrued giveback obligations, which are separately presented in the consolidated balance sheets. The components of the accrued giveback obligations are as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$(18.4)$(18.4)
Global Credit(22.5)(11.8)
Total$(40.9)$(30.2)

Principal Equity-Method Investments, Excluding Performance Allocations
The Company’s principal equity method investments (excluding performance allocations) include its fund investments in Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Global Investment Solutions typically as general partner interests, and its strategic investments in Fortitude and iStar through Carlyle-affiliated funds (included within Global Credit) and NGP (included within Global Private Equity), which are not consolidated. Principal investments are related to the following segments:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity(1)
$1,853.5 $1,231.2 
Global Credit(2)
974.2 819.7 
Global Investment Solutions94.3 77.7 
Total$2,922.0 $2,128.6 
(1) The balance includes $1,015.7 million and $436.9 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, related to the Company’s equity method investments in NGP.
(2) As of December 31, 2022, the balance includes $646.0 million and $176.6 million related to the Company’s strategic investments in Fortitude and iStar, respectively, through Carlyle-affiliated investment funds. As of December 31, 2021, the balance includes $715.7 million related to the Company’s strategic investment in Fortitude.

The summarized financial information of the Company’s equity method investees from the date of initial investment is as follows (Dollars in millions):
 Global
Private Equity
 Global CreditGlobal Investment SolutionsAggregate Totals
For the Year Ended
December 31,
For the Year Ended
December 31,
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended
December 31,
 202220212020202220212020202220212020202220212020
Statement of operations information
Investment income$3,129.1 $1,736.4 $652.7 $1,803.9 $2,000.5 $1,012.2 $115.2 $107.2 $50.5 $5,048.2 $3,844.1 $1,715.4 
Expenses2,151.6 1,511.4 1,702.2 591.8 448.5 240.7 1,139.2 1,524.2 965.2 3,882.6 3,484.1 2,908.1 
Net investment income (loss)977.5 225.0 (1,049.5)1,212.1 1,552.0 771.5 (1,024.0)(1,417.0)(914.7)1,165.6 360.0 (1,192.7)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)10,643.7 26,875.3 7,889.4 (1.9)918.1 (682.5)2,876.1 10,593.0 4,039.7 13,517.9 38,386.4 11,246.6 
Net income (loss)$11,621.2 $27,100.3 $6,839.9 $1,210.2 $2,470.1 $89.0 $1,852.1 $9,176.0 $3,125.0 $14,683.5 $38,746.4 $10,053.9 
 
199
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$(8.7) $(3.9)
Real Assets(58.1) (156.9)
Total$(66.8) $(160.8)
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership paid $98.4 million to satisfy giveback obligations related to two of its Real Assets funds. Approximately $67.1 million of these obligations was paid by current and former senior Carlyle professionals and $31.3 million by Carlyle Holdings.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Partnership paid $47.3 million to satisfy a giveback obligation related to one of its Corporate Private Equity funds. Substantially all of the giveback obligation was paid by current and former senior Carlyle professionals.

208


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Global
Private Equity
Global CreditGlobal Investment SolutionsAggregate Totals
 As of December 31,As of December 31,As of December 31,As of December 31,
 20222021202220212022202120222021
Balance sheet information
Investments$115,130.1 $96,269.1 $24,555.6 $19,745.8 $32,326.2 $30,545.9 $172,011.9 $146,560.8 
Total assets$118,731.6 $103,063.3 $25,476.7 $21,135.4 $32,294.5 $30,517.0 $176,502.8 $154,715.7 
Debt$15,924.8 $10,552.6 $5,150.3 $5,186.6 $2,261.2 $1,841.1 $23,336.3 $17,580.3 
Other liabilities$1,338.3 $1,199.8 $418.0 $282.4 $825.6 $402.2 $2,581.9 $1,884.4 
Total liabilities$17,263.1 $11,752.4 $5,568.3 $5,469.0 $3,086.8 $2,243.3 $25,918.2 $19,464.7 
Partners’ capital$101,468.5 $91,310.9 $19,908.4 $15,666.4 $29,207.7 $28,273.7 $150,584.6 $135,251.0 
Performance Fees
Strategic Investment in Fortitude
On November 13, 2018, the Company acquired a 19.9% interest in Fortitude Group Holdings, LLC (“Fortitude Holdings”), a wholly owned subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) (“the Minority Transaction”), pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, AIG and Fortitude Holdings, dated as of July 31, 2018 (the “2018 MIPA”). Fortitude Holdings owns 100% of the outstanding common shares of Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd., a Bermuda domiciled reinsurer (“Fortitude Re,” f/k/a “DSA Re”) established to reinsure a portfolio of AIG’s legacy life, annuity and property and casualty liabilities.
The performance fees includedCompany paid $381 million in revenues are derivedcash at closing of the Minority Transaction (the “Initial Purchase Price”) and expects to pay up to $95 million in additional deferred consideration following December 31, 2023. In May 2020, the Initial Purchase Price was adjusted upward by $99.5 million in accordance with the 2018 MIPA as Fortitude Holdings chose not to distribute a planned non-pro rata dividend to AIG prior to May 13, 2020. The Company paid $79.6 million of such adjustment in May 2020 and will pay the remaining $19.9 million following December 31, 2023.
On June 2, 2020, Carlyle FRL, L.P. (“Carlyle FRL”), a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund, acquired a 51.6% ownership interest in Fortitude Holdings from AIG (the “Control Transaction”) and T&D United Capital Co., Ltd. (“T&D”), a subsidiary of T&D Holdings, Inc., purchased a 25.0% ownership interest as a strategic third-party investor pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, AIG, Carlyle FRL, and T&D, dated as of November 25, 2019 (the “2019 MIPA”). At closing, the Company contributed its existing 19.9% interest in Fortitude Holdings to Carlyle FRL, such that Carlyle FRL held a 71.5% interest in Fortitude Holdings. Taken together, Carlyle FRL and T&D had 96.5% ownership of Fortitude Holdings. On October 1, 2021, Carlyle FRL, T&D and AIG effected a restructuring of the ownership of Fortitude Holdings that interposed FGH Parent, L.P. (“FGH Parent”), as the direct parent company of Fortitude Holdings (the “Restructuring”). Each of Carlyle FRL, T&D and AIG contributed the entirety of their interest in Fortitude Holdings to FGH Parent in exchange for an equivalent ownership interest in FGH Parent. References to “Fortitude” prior to the Restructuring refer to Fortitude Holdings. For periods subsequent to the Restructuring, references to “Fortitude” refer to FGH Parent.
In March 2022, the Company raised $2.0 billion in third-party equity capital from certain investors in Carlyle FRL and T&D, and committed $100 million from the following segments:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$1,629.6
 $289.6
 $698.2
Global Credit56.6
 37.4
 (41.0)
Real Assets265.2
 321.1
 49.3
Investment Solutions142.5
 103.7
 118.4
Total$2,093.9
 $751.8
 $824.9
Approximately 61%Company for additional equity capital in Fortitude. In May 2022, Fortitude called $1.1 billion of the capital raise, with the remaining capital expected to be called in 2023. In connection with the capital raise and subsequent funding, the Company’s indirect ownership of Fortitude decreased from 19.9% to 13.5%. As a result of the dilution, the Company recorded a reduction in the carrying value of its equity method investment and corresponding loss of $176.9 million. At the time the remaining capital is called by Fortitude, the Company’s indirect ownership is expected to further decrease to 10.5%, or $1,273.2and the Company expects to record an additional reduction in the carrying value of its equity method investment and corresponding loss of approximately $121 million, of performance fees forbased on the year endedcarrying value as of December 31, 2017 are related2022, subject to change based on the following funds along with total revenue recognized (total revenue includes performance fees, fund management fees,timing of the dilution and investment income):
Carlyle Partners V, L.P. (Corporate Private Equity segment) - $335.1 million,
Carlyle Partners VI, L.P. (Corporate Private Equity segment) - $844.5 million, and
Carlyle Asia Partners IV, L.P. (Corporate Private Equity segment) - $381.8 million.
Approximately 28%, or $214.2 million,changes in the carrying value of performance fees for the year endedinvestment. As of December 31, 2016 are related2022, the carrying value of the Company’s investment in Carlyle FRL, which is an investment company that accounts for its investment in Fortitude at fair value, was $646.0 million, relative to its cost of $389.4 million.
The Company has a strategic asset management relationship with Fortitude pursuant to which Fortitude committed to allocate assets in asset management strategies and vehicles of the following funds along with total revenue recognized (total revenue includes performance fees, fund management fees,Company and investment income):
Carlyle Partners V, L.P. (Corporate Private Equity segment) - $194.4 million, and
Carlyle Realty Partners VII, L.P. (Real Assets segment) - $138.7 million.
Approximately 51%, or $422.1 million,its affiliates. As of performance fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 are related2022, Fortitude Holdings and certain Fortitude reinsurance counterparties have committed approximately $9.2 billion of capital to-date to various Carlyle strategies. On April 1, 2022, the following funds alongCompany entered into a new strategic advisory services agreement with total revenue recognized (total revenue includes performance fees, fund management fees, and investment income for the following funds):
Carlyle Europe Partners III, L.P. (Corporate Private Equity segment) - $273.4 million,
Carlyle Asia Partners III, L.P. (Corporate Private Equity segment) - $202.7 million,
Carlyle Realty Partners VI, L.P. (Real Assets segment) - $116.4 million, and
Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund III, L.P. (Real Assets segment) - $(102.6) million.

5. Investments
Investments consist of the following:
200
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Equity method investments, excluding accrued performance fees$1,218.4
 $950.9
Investments in CLOs and other405.9
 156.1
Total investments$1,624.3
 $1,107.0

209


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


certain subsidiaries of Fortitude through a newly-formed investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C.
(“CISM”). Under the agreement, CISM provides Fortitude with certain services, including business development and growth,
transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on
Fortitude’s general account assets, which adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability. Third party
investors who participated in the March 2022 capital raise also made a minority investment in CISM, which is reflected as a
non-controlling interest in consolidated entities in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Strategic Investment in NGP
In December 2012, the Partnership entered into an agreement with ECM Capital, L.P. (“ECM”) and Barclays Natural Resource Investments, a division of Barclays Bank PLC (“BNRI”), to make an investmentThe Company has equity interests in NGP Management Company, L.L.C. (“NGP Management”), the general partners of certain carry funds advised by NGP, and together withprincipal investments in certain NGP funds. The Company does not control NGP and accounts for its affiliates, “NGP”), an Irving, Texas-based energy investor. The agreement was amended in March 2017 to further align the interests of the Partnership and NGP. The Partnership’s equity interestsinvestments in NGP Managementunder the equity method of accounting, and includes these investments in the Global Private Equity segment. These interests entitle the PartnershipCompany to an allocation of income equal to 55.0% of the management fee-related revenues of the NGP entities that serveManagement which serves as the advisorsinvestment advisor to certain private equityNGP funds as well as 47.5% of the performance allocations received by certain current and future NGP fund general partners.
The Company’s investments in NGP as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are as follows:
As of December 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)
Investment in NGP Management$369.7 $371.8 
Investments in NGP general partners - accrued performance allocations564.5 3.8 
Principal investments in NGP funds81.5 61.3 
Total investments in NGP$1,015.7 $436.9 
Investment in NGP Management. The Company’s equity interests in the general partners of certain future carry funds advised by NGP thatManagement entitle the PartnershipCompany to an allocation of income equal to 47.5%55.0% of the carried interest received by such fund general partners.
In consideration for these interests, the Partnership paid an aggregate of $504.6 million in cash to ECM and BNRI, and issued 996,572 Carlyle Holdings partnership units to ECM that vest ratably through 2017. In January 2016, the Partnership also paid contingent consideration to BNRI of $183.0 million, of which $63.0 million was paid in cash and $120.0 million was paid by the Partnership by issuing a promissory note due in 2022 (see Note 7). The transaction also included contingent consideration payable to ECM of up to $45.0 million in cash (of which $22.5 million was paid in March 2017 with the balance paid in January 2018), together with an additional $15.0 million in cash, which was paid in January 2018, and 597,944 Carlyle Holdings partnership units that were issued in December 2012 and substantially vested upon the amendment in March 2017. The Partnership has also agreed to issue common units on each of February 1, 2018, 2019, and 2020, with a value of $10.0 million per year to an affiliatemanagement fee-related revenues of NGP Management, which serves as the investment advisor to the NGP Energy Funds. Management fees are generally calculated as 1.0% to 2.0% of the limited partners’ commitments during the fund’s investment period, and subsequent0.5% to 2020, to issue common units on an annual basis with a value not to exceed $10.0 million per year2.0% based on a prescribed formula, which will vest over a 42-monththe lower of cost or fair market value of invested capital following the expiration or termination of the investment period. The Partnership has the right to purchase the remaining equity interests inManagement fee-related revenues from NGP Management in specific remote situations designed to protectare primarily driven by NGP XII, NGP XI and NGP X during the Partnership's interest.years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
The Partnership accounts for its investments in NGP under the equity method of accounting. The Partnership recorded its investments in NGP initially at cost, excluding any elements in the transaction that were deemed to be compensatory arrangements to NGP personnel. The Carlyle Holdings partnership units issued in the transaction and the deferred restricted common units (which were granted in 2012 to certain NGP personnel) were deemed to be compensatory arrangements; these elements are recognized as an expense under applicable U.S. GAAP.
The PartnershipCompany records investment income (loss) for its equity income allocation from NGP management fees and performance fees,fee-related revenues and also records its share of any allocated expenses from NGP Management, expenses associated with the compensatory elements of the transaction,strategic investment, and the amortization of the basis differences related to the definitive-liveddefinite-lived identifiable intangible assets of NGP Management. The net investment earningsincome (loss) recognized in the Partnership’sCompany’s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Management fee-related revenues from NGP Management$71.0 $72.9 $73.9 
Expenses related to the investment in NGP Management(11.5)(10.8)(11.0)
Amortization of basis differences from the investment in NGP Management(1.4)(2.9)(4.3)
Net investment income from NGP Management$58.1 $59.2 $58.6 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Management fees$80.5
 $80.7
 $53.9
Performance fees98.4
 44.7
 (18.5)
Investment income (loss)12.1
 9.4
 (3.3)
Expenses(54.0) (16.0) (15.3)
Amortization of basis differences(8.5) (55.2) (56.6)
Net investment income (loss)$128.5
 $63.6
 $(39.8)


The difference between the Partnership’sCompany’s remaining carrying value of its investment and its share of the underlying net assets of the investee was $21.3 million, $29.8$1.4 million and $85.0$4.2 million as of December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively; these differences arewere amortized over a period of 10 years from the initial investment date.

date and were fully amortized as of December 31, 2022. The Company assesses the remaining carrying value of its equity method investment for impairment whenever events or
210
201


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, and considers factors including, but not limited to, expected cash flows from its interest in future management fees and NGP’s ability to raise new funds.
Equity-Method Investments
Investment in the General Partners of NGP Carry Funds. The Partnership’sCompany’s investment in the general partners of the NGP Carry Funds entitle it to 47.5% of the performance allocations received by certain current and future NGP fund general partners. The Company records its equity income allocation from NGP performance allocations in principal investment income (loss) from equity method investments includerather than performance allocations in its fundconsolidated statements of operations. The Company recognized net investment earnings (losses) related to these performance allocations in its consolidated statements of operations of $560.7 million and $3.8 million for years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. There were no net investment earnings (losses) related to these performance allocations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Principal Investments in NGP Funds. The Company also holds principal investments in Corporate Private Equity, Real Assets, Global Credit,the NGP Carry Funds. The Company recognized net investment earnings (losses) related to principal investment income in its consolidated statements of operations of $44.5 million, $20.1 million and Investment Solutions typically as general partner interests,$(12.0) million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and its strategic2020, respectively.

Principal Investments in CLOs and Other Investments
Principal investments in NGP (included within Real Assets), which are not consolidated. Investments are related toCLOs as of December 31, 2022 and 2021were $526.1 million and $361.1 million, respectively, and consisted of investments in CLO senior and subordinated notes. In connection with the following segments:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$369.5
 $282.4
Real Assets775.1
 622.8
Global Credit23.0
 20.1
Investment Solutions50.8
 25.6
Total$1,218.4
 $950.9
The summarized financial informationacquisition of the Partnership’s equity method investees fromCBAM CLO management contracts in March 2022, the dateCompany acquired investments in CLO senior and subordinated notes of initial$175.9 million (see Note 4). A portion of the Company’s principal investments in CLOs is collateral to CLO term loans (see Note 8). As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, other investments includes the Company’s investment is as follows (Dollars in millions):
 
Corporate
Private Equity

Real Assets  Global Credit
Investment Solutions Aggregate Totals

For the Year Ended
December 31,

For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,

For the Year Ended December 31, 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Statement of operations information                             
Investment income$630.8
 $532.2
 $380.7
 $230.4
 $679.5
 $441.2
 $267.7
 $167.4
 $193.6
 $78.6
 $107.2
 $118.6
 $1,207.5
 $1,486.3
 $1,134.1
Expenses553.3
 597.1
 613.8
 572.4
 544.3
 604.4
 118.8
 95.1
 45.7
 665.5
 493.0
 436.5
 1,910.0
 1,729.5
 1,700.4
Net investment income (loss)77.5
 (64.9) (233.1) (342.0) 135.2
 (163.2) 148.9
 72.3
 147.9
 (586.9) (385.8) (317.9) (702.5) (243.2) (566.3)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)9,587.4
 2,906.8
 4,831.6
 2,605.6
 2,184.2
 (3,047.6) (51.5) (504.6) (323.1) 2,676.3
 2,360.2
 2,511.1
 14,817.8
 6,946.6
 3,972.0
Net income (loss)$9,664.9
 $2,841.9
 $4,598.5
 $2,263.6
 $2,319.4
 $(3,210.8) $97.4
 $(432.3) $(175.2) $2,089.4
 $1,974.4
 $2,193.2
 $14,115.3
 $6,703.4
 $3,405.7

Corporate
Private Equity

Real Assets Global Credit
Investment Solutions Aggregate Totals
 As of December 31,
As of December 31, As of December 31,
As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Balance sheet information                   
Investments$42,129.8
 $31,427.7
 $24,352.0
 $21,460.2
 $3,873.5
 $2,240.8
 $16,155.4
 $13,312.6
 $86,510.7
 $68,441.3
Total assets$44,987.0
 $33,605.0
 $25,894.9
 $22,666.0
 $4,050.0
 $2,502.5
 $16,402.5
 $13,476.3
 $91,334.4
 $72,249.8
Debt$2,141.8
 $416.2
 $2,633.0
 $1,552.9
 $508.1
 $170.4
 $135.0
 $96.8
 $5,417.9
 $2,236.3
Other liabilities$693.2
 $607.2
 $239.6
 $384.1
 $128.7
 $94.3
 $379.5
 $304.1
 $1,441.0
 $1,389.7
Total liabilities$2,835.0
 $1,023.4
 $2,872.6
 $1,937.0
 $636.8
 $264.7
 $514.5
 $400.9
 $6,858.9
 $3,626.0
Partners’ capital$42,152.0
 $32,581.6
 $23,022.3
 $20,729.0
 $3,413.2
 $2,237.8
 $15,888.0
 $13,075.4
 $84,475.5
 $68,623.8

211


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


BDC Preferred Shares at fair value of $76.9 million and $72.5 million, respectively (see Note 11).
Investment Income (Loss)
The components of investment income (loss) are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance allocations
Realized$2,048.8 $2,956.7 $591.1 
Unrealized(721.3)3,127.9 1,044.8 
1,327.5 6,084.6 1,635.9 
Principal investment income (loss) from equity method investments (excluding performance allocations)
Realized73.1 266.2 135.5 
Unrealized546.4 290.8 (679.3)
619.5 557.0 (543.8)
Principal investment income (loss) from investments in CLOs and other investments
Realized5.0 1.9 0.3 
Unrealized(1)
(54.0)78.4 2.8 
(49.0)80.3 3.1 
Total$1,898.0 $6,721.9 $1,095.2 
(1) The year ended December 31, 2021 includes investment income of $49.8 million associated with the remeasurement of a corporate investment, which was previously carried at cost, resulting from observable price changes pursuant to ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities.
The performance allocations included in revenues are derived from the following segments:
202

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Income from equity investments$226.4
 $150.6
 $10.4
Income (loss) from investments in CLOs and other investments5.6
 9.6
 (1.7)
Other investment income
 0.3
 6.5
Total$232.0
 $160.5
 $15.2
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$1,098.3 $5,223.2 $1,440.5 
Global Credit24.0 156.6 21.5 
Global Investment Solutions205.2 704.8 173.9 
Total$1,327.5 $6,084.6 $1,635.9 
Approximately 19%, or $245.8 million, of performance allocations for the year ended December 31, 2022 are related to the following funds along with total revenue recognized (total revenue includes performance allocations, fund management fees, and principal investment income):
Carlyle Realty Partners VIII, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $260.8 million,
Carlyle Europe Partners V, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $259.3 million,
Carlyle Power Partners II, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $203.3 million,
Carlyle Europe Technology Partners IV, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $179.8 million,
Carlyle Partners VI, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $(436.9) million
Approximately 34%, or $2,045.3 million, of performance allocations for the year ended December 31, 2021 are related to the following funds along with total revenue recognized (total revenue includes performance allocations, fund management fees, and principal investment income):
Carlyle Partners VI, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $1,453.1 million,
Carlyle Partners VII, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $988.4 million
Approximately 89%, or $1,455.3 million, of performance allocations for the year ended December 31, 2020 are related to the following funds along with total revenue recognized (total revenue includes performance allocations, fund management fees, and principal investment income):
Carlyle Partners VI, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $1,251.5 million,
Carlyle Asia Partners IV, L.P. (Global Private Equity segment) – $374.1 million
Carlyle’s investment income (loss) from its equity-methodprincipal equity method investments is included in investment income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations and consists of:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Global Private Equity$744.8 $346.7 $137.1 
Global Credit(134.8)183.4 (690.4)
Global Investment Solutions9.5 26.9 9.5 
Total$619.5 $557.0 $(543.8)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Corporate Private Equity$64.8
 $51.8
 $28.9
Real Assets151.7
 101.2
 (18.6)
Global Credit1.7
 (3.8) (0.9)
Investment Solutions8.2
 1.4
 1.0
Total$226.4
 $150.6
 $10.4

Investments in CLOs and Other Investments
Investments in CLOs and other investments as ofPrincipal investment loss for Global Credit for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 primarily consisted2022 includes an investment loss of $405.9$176.9 million and $156.1on the Company’s equity method investment in Carlyle FRL related to the dilution of the Company’s indirect ownership in Fortitude from 19.9% to 13.5%. Principal investment loss for Global Credit for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes a loss of $620.7 million respectively,related to the contribution of investmentsthe Company’s investment in CLO senior and subordinated notes, derivative instruments, and corporate mezzanine securities and bonds.Fortitude Holdings to Carlyle FRL, as discussed above in “Strategic Investment in Fortitude.”
Investments of Consolidated Funds
The PartnershipCompany consolidates the financial positions and results of operations of certain CLOs in which it is the primary beneficiary. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, the Partnership formed sevenCompany did not form any new CLOs for which the PartnershipCompany is the primary beneficiary of two of those CLOs. Asbeneficiary. Investments in Consolidated Funds as of December 31, 2017, the total assets of these CLOs formed during the year and included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements were approximately $1.2 billion.


2022 also include $377.4 million related to
212
203


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


investments that have been bridged by the Company to investment funds that are actively fundraising and are accounted for as consolidated VIEs. During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company purchased $61.0 million of certain third-party interests in a Global Investment Solutions fund. The fund is consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022.

The following table presents a summary of the investments held by the Consolidated Funds. Investments held by the Consolidated Funds do not represent the investments of all Carlyle sponsored funds. The table below presents investments as a percentage of investments of Consolidated Funds:
 Fair ValuePercentage of Investments of
Consolidated Funds
Geographic Region/Instrument Type/ IndustryDecember 31,December 31,
Description or Investment Strategy2022202120222021
 (Dollars in millions)  
United States
Equity securities:
Infrastructure$413.4 — 6.00 %— %
Other13.9 — 0.20 %— %
Total equity securities (cost of $436.0 and $— at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)427.3 — 6.20 %— %
Partnership and LLC interests:
Fund Investments$515.9 $120.5 7.48 %1.81 %
Total Partnership and LLC interests (cost of $504.2 and $120.8 at
  December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)
515.9 120.5 7.48 %1.81 %
Loans:
Aerospace & Defense$10.9 $79.8 0.16 %1.20 %
Collateralized Debt Obligation11.6 — 0.17 %— %
Environmental Industries0.9 0.9 0.01 %0.01 %
Investment Company 51.3  %0.77 %
Other 25.0  %0.38 %
Total loans (cost of $26.4 and $157.1 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)23.4 157.0 0.34 %2.36 %
Assets of the CLOs:
Bonds$57.5 $40.2 0.83 %0.60 %
Equity1.3 8.5 0.02 %0.13 %
Loans2,717.9 2,629.4 39.42 %39.47 %
Total assets of the CLOs (cost of $2,974.2 and $2,697.9 at
  December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)
2,776.7 2,678.1 40.27 %40.20 %
Total United States$3,743.3 $2,955.6 54.29 %44.37 %
Europe
Assets of the CLOs:
Bonds$533.5 $557.6 7.74 %8.37 %
Equity2.1 9.4 0.03 %0.14 %
Loans2,527.2 3,058.8 36.66 %45.92 %
Total assets of the CLOs (cost of $3,334.0 and $3,649.0 at
   December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)
3,062.8 3,625.8 44.43 %54.43 %
Total Europe$3,062.8 $3,625.8 44.43 %54.43 %
Global
Assets of the CLOs:
Bonds$3.9 $1.7 0.06 %0.03 %
Loans84.4 77.9 1.22 %1.17 %
Total assets of the CLOs (cost of $96.7 and $80.5 at
  December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)
88.3 79.6 1.28 %1.20 %
Total Global$88.3 $79.6 1.28 %1.20 %
Total investments of Consolidated Funds (cost of $7,371.5 and $6,705.3 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)$6,894.4 $6,661.0 100.00 %100.00 %
204

  Fair Value Percentage of Investments of
Consolidated Funds
 
 Geographic Region/Instrument Type/ IndustryDecember 31, December 31,
 Description or Investment Strategy2017 2016 2017 2016
  (Dollars in millions)    
 United States       
 Assets of the CLOs:
 
 
 
 Bonds$36.6
 $12.5
 0.81% 0.32%
 Equity2.2
 0.7
 0.05% 0.02%
 Loans1,644.4
 1,941.7
 36.27% 49.87%
 Total assets of the CLOs (cost of $1,661.1 and $1,958.6 at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
1,683.2
 1,954.9
 37.13% 50.21%
 Total United States$1,683.2
 $1,954.9
 37.13% 50.21%
The Carlyle Group Inc.

Europe       
Equity securities:       
Other5.7
 $9.6
 0.13% 0.25%
Total equity securities (cost of $28.1 and $97.0 at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
5.7
 9.6
 0.13% 0.25%
Assets of the CLOs:
   
  
Bonds368.5
 377.7
 8.13% 9.70%
Loans2,369.9
 1,403.9
 52.26% 36.06%
Other0.3
 1.4
 % 0.03%
Total assets of the CLOs (cost of $2,745.1 and $1,777.0 at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
2,738.7
 1,783.0
 60.39% 45.79%
Total Europe$2,744.4
 $1,792.6
 60.52% 46.04%
Global
   
  
Assets of the CLOs:
   
  
Bonds$8.3
 $6.2
 0.18% 0.16%
Loans98.4
 140.0
 2.17% 3.59%
Total assets of the CLOs (cost of $107.7 and $147.9 at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)
106.7
 146.2
 2.35% 3.75%
Total Global$106.7
 $146.2
 2.35% 3.75%
Total investments of Consolidated Funds (cost of $4,542.0 and $3,980.5 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)$4,534.3
 $3,893.7
 100.00% 100.00%
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
There were no individual investments with a fair value greater than five percent of the Partnership’sCompany’s total assets for any period presented.


Interest and Other Income of Consolidated Funds
The components of interest and other income of Consolidated Funds are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Interest income from investments$167.3
 $140.4
 $873.1
Other income10.4
 26.5
 102.4
Total$177.7
 $166.9
 $975.5

213


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Interest income from investments$282.3 $231.3 $211.6 
Other income28.7 21.9 15.2 
Total$311.0 $253.2 $226.8 
Net Investment Gains (Losses) of Consolidated Funds
Net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds include net realized gains (losses) from sales of investments and unrealized gains (losses) resulting from changes in fair value of the Consolidated Funds’ investments. The components of net investment gains (losses) of Consolidated Funds are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31, 202220212020
2017 2016 2015 (Dollars in millions)
Gains (losses) from investments of Consolidated FundsGains (losses) from investments of Consolidated Funds$(408.1)$76.6 $(29.1)
Gains (losses) from liabilities of CLOsGains (losses) from liabilities of CLOs366.6 (74.1)7.8 
(Dollars in millions)
Gains from investments of Consolidated Funds$27.0
 $51.7
 $426.2
Gains (losses) from liabilities of CLOs61.4
 (40.5) 436.5
Gains on other assets of CLOs
 1.9
 1.7
Total$88.4
 $13.1
 $864.4
Total$(41.5)$2.5 $(21.3)
The following table presents realized and unrealized gains (losses) earned from investments of the Consolidated Funds:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Realized gains (losses)$(29.6)$9.6 $(91.3)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)(378.5)67.0 62.2 
Total$(408.1)$76.6 $(29.1)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Realized gains (losses)$(54.0) $(33.4) $1,114.7
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)81.0
 85.1
 (688.5)
Total$27.0
 $51.7
 $426.2

6.7. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The following table summarizes the carrying amount of intangible assets as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Acquired contractual rights$920.2 $48.0 
Accumulated amortization(126.3)(26.4)
Finite-lived intangible assets, net793.9 21.6 
Goodwill103.9 13.3 
Intangible assets, net$897.8 $34.9 

    
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Acquired contractual rights(1)
$81.4
 $74.1
Acquired trademarks(1)
1.2
 1.0
Accumulated amortization(57.8) (43.2)
Finite-lived intangible assets, net24.8
 31.9
Goodwill(1)
11.1
 10.1
Intangible assets, net$35.9
 $42.0

(1) Changes in the carrying amounts of acquired contractual rights, acquired trademarks, and goodwill are due to foreign currency translation.

As of December 31, 2017, all2022, goodwill included $91.1 million related to the Company’s Global Private Equity segment in connection with the acquisition of Abingworth. The remaining balance as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 consisted of $5.5
205

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the remaining finite-lived intangible assets, net, areConsolidated Financial Statements
million and $5.5 million associated with the Partnership'sCompany’s Global Credit segment, respectively, and $7.3 million and $7.8 million associated with the Company’s Global Investment Solutions segment.segment, respectively.
    
As discussed in Note 2,3, the PartnershipCompany reviews its intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $4.0 million on certain acquired contractual rights related to Carlyle Aviation Partners as a result of impaired income streams from aircraft under lease in Russia. No impairment losses were recorded during the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Partnership evaluated for indicators of impairment certain definite-lived intangible assets associated with acquired contractual rights for fee income. These intangible assets are included in the Global Credit and Investment Solutions segments. The Partnership recorded impairment losses, primarily as a result of the redemptions received on the open-ended credit hedge funds in the Global Credit segment and with the open-ended fund of hedge funds in the Investment Solutions segment, of $186.6 million and $15.0 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, the Partnership recorded a $7.0 million goodwill impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2015 as a result of the Partnership's decision to restructure the Investment Solutions segment. Finally, the Partnership recorded an additional impairment loss of $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to reduce the carrying value of other Global Credit intangible assets to their estimated fair value. 2020.

214


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The fair value determinations were based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. These fair value measurements were based on significant inputs not observable in the market (primarily discount rates ranging from 10% to 20%) and thus represented Level III measurements as defined in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. The impairment losses were included in general, administrative and other expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Intangible asset amortization expense excluding impairment losses, was $10.1$103.9 million, $42.5$10.2 million and $76.1$14.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, and is included in general, administrative, and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes the expected amortization expense for 20182023 through 20222027 and thereafter (Dollars in millions):
2023$131.2 
2024131.3 
2025131.2 
2026131.1 
2027121.0 
Thereafter148.1 
$793.9 

  
2018$9.8
20196.0
20206.0
20213.0
 $24.8
7.8. Borrowings
The PartnershipCompany borrows and enters into credit agreements for its general operating and investment purposes. The Partnership’sCompany’s debt obligations consist of the following (Dollars in millions):following:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 Borrowing
Outstanding
 Carrying
Value
 Borrowing
Outstanding
 Carrying
Value
Senior Credit Facility Term Loan Due 5/05/2020$25.0
 $24.8
 $25.0
 $24.7
CLO Term Loans (See below)294.5
 294.5
 33.8
 33.8
3.875% Senior Notes Due 2/01/2023500.0
 497.6
 500.0
 497.2
5.625% Senior Notes Due 3/30/2043600.0
 600.7
 600.0
 600.7
Promissory Note Due 1/01/2022108.8
 108.8
 108.8
 108.8
Promissory Notes Due 7/15/201947.2
 47.2
 
 
Total debt obligations$1,575.5
 $1,573.6
 $1,267.6
 $1,265.2
 As of December 31,
 20222021
Borrowing
Outstanding
Carrying
Value
Borrowing
Outstanding
Carrying
Value
(Dollars in millions)
CLO Borrowings (See below)$421.7 $418.1 $222.6 $219.0 
5.625% Senior Notes Due 3/30/2043600.0 600.6 600.0 600.6 
5.650% Senior Notes Due 9/15/2048350.0 346.3 350.0 346.1 
3.500% Senior Notes Due 9/19/2029425.0 422.0 425.0 421.6 
4.625% Subordinated Notes Due 5/15/2061500.0 484.7 500.0 484.3 
Total debt obligations$2,296.7 $2,271.7 $2,097.6 $2,071.6 
 
Senior Credit Facility
As of December 31, 2017,2022, the senior credit facility, which was amended on April 29, 2022, included $25.0 million in a term loan and $750.0 million$1.0 billion in a revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2017, the term loan andThe revolving credit facility wereis scheduled to mature on May 5, 2020. PrincipalApril 29, 2027, and principal amounts outstanding under the term loan and revolving credit facility accrue interest, at the option of the borrowers, either (a) at an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin not to exceed 0.75%0.50%, or (b) at SOFR (or similar benchmark for non-U.S. dollar borrowings) plus a 0.10% adjustment and an applicable margin not to exceed 1.50% (at December 31, 2022, the interest rate was 5.46%). Prior to the April 2022 amendment, the size of the revolving credit facility was $775.0 million, which was scheduled to mature February 11, 2024, and accrued interest either (a) at an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin not to exceed 0.50%, or (b) at LIBOR plus an applicable margin not to exceed 1.75% (at December 31, 2017, the interest rate was 2.60%)1.50%. There was no amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility atas of December 31, 2017.2022. The Company made no borrowings under the revolving credit facility during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company borrowed and repaid in full
206

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
$250.0 million under the revolving credit facility. Interest expense under the senior credit facility was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015. The fair value2020.
    Global Credit Revolving Credit Facility
On December 17, 2018, certain subsidiaries of the Company established a revolving line of credit, primarily intended to support certain lending activities within the Global Credit segment. The credit facility, which was amended in December 2020 and September 2021, is scheduled to mature in September 2024, and has a capacity of $250.0 million. Principal amounts outstanding balancesunder the facility accrue interest, at the option of the term loan and revolvingborrowers, either (a) at an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin not to exceed 1.00%, or (b) at the Eurocurrency rate plus an applicable margin, not to exceed 2.00%.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company made no borrowings under the credit facility atand there was no balance outstanding as of December 31, 20172022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company borrowed $70.0 million and 2016 approximated par value based on current market ratesrepaid $70.0 million under the credit facility, and there was no borrowing outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company borrowed $44.1 million and repaid $79.9 million under the credit facility, and there was no borrowing outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2020. Interest expense was not significant for similar debt instrumentsthe years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and are classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy.
On April 6, 2017, the Partnership borrowed $250.0 million against the $750.0 million revolving credit facility. This amount was repaid in full on June 2, 2017.

215


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


2020.
CLO Term LoansBorrowings
For certain of ourthe Company’s CLOs, the PartnershipCompany finances a portion of its investment in the CLOs through the proceeds received from term loans and other financing arrangements with financial institutions. The Partnership'sCompany’s outstanding CLO term loansborrowings consist of the following (Dollars in millions):
Formation Date Borrowing
Outstanding
December 31, 2017
  Borrowing Outstanding December 31, 2016 Maturity Date (1) Interest Rate as of December 31, 2017 
October 3, 2013 $
(2) $13.2
(2)September 28, 2018 NA(3)
June 7, 2016 20.6
  20.6
 July 15, 2027 3.16%(4)
February 28, 2017 74.3
  
 September 21, 2029 2.33%(5)
April 19, 2017 22.8
  
 April 22, 2031 3.29%(6) (15)
June 28, 2017 23.1
  
 July 22, 2031 3.29%(7) (15)
July 20, 2017 24.4
  
 April 21, 2027 2.90%(8) (15)
August 2, 2017 22.8
  
 July 23, 2029 3.17%(9) (15)
August 2, 2017 20.9
  
 August 3, 2022 1.75%(10)
August 14, 2017 22.6
  
 August 15, 2030 3.26%(11) (15)
November 30, 2017 22.7
  
 January 16, 2030 3.12%(12) (15)
December 6, 2017 19.1
  
 October 16, 2030 3.01%(13) (15)
December 7, 2017 21.2
  
 January 19, 2029 2.73%(14) (15)
  $294.5
  $33.8
     
Formation Date
Borrowing
Outstanding
December 31, 2022
Borrowing Outstanding December 31, 2021
Maturity Date(1)
Interest Rate as of December 31, 2022
February 28, 2017$38.7 $51.3 November 17, 20312.40%(2)
June 29, 201754.8 — July 20, 20305.89%(4),(6)
December 6, 201743.8 — January 15, 20315.45%(5),(6)
March 15, 20191.8 1.9 March 15, 203210.15%(3)
August 20, 20193.9 4.1 August 15, 20326.53%(3)
September 15, 202019.1 20.3 April 15, 20332.96%(3)
January 8, 202119.9 21.3 January 15, 20343.87%(3)
March 9, 202119.1 20.3 August 15, 20303.17%(3)
March 30, 202118.0 19.1 March 15, 20323.75%(3)
April 21, 20213.4 3.7 April 15, 20337.23%(3)
May 21, 202115.0 15.9 November 17, 20313.16%(3)
June 4, 202120.0 21.3 January 16, 20343.66%(3)
June 10, 20211.3 1.4 November 17, 20314.65%(3)
July 15, 202115.0 — July 15, 20343.67%(3),(6)
July 20, 202120.0 — July 20, 20313.73%(3),(6)
August 4, 202116.2 17.2 August 15, 20323.54%(3)
October 27, 202123.3 24.8 October 15, 20353.78%(3)
November 5, 202113.8 — January 14, 20343.46%(3),(6)
January 6, 202220.1 — February 15, 20354.18%(3)
February 22, 202220.1 — November 10, 20354.24%(3)
July 13, 202216.9 — January 13, 20353.61%(3)
October 25, 202217.5 — October 25, 20355.62%(3)
$421.7 $222.6 
    
207

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(1)     Maturity date is earlier of date indicated or the date that the CLO is dissolved.
(2)    OriginalOutstanding borrowing of €12.6 million.€36.1 million; incurs interest at EURIBOR plus applicable margins as defined in the agreement.
(3)    Note paid off in 2017.Incurs interest at the average effective interest rate of each class of purchased securities plus 0.50% spread percentage.
(4)    Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.65%.
(5)    Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.37%.
(6)    The respective CLO assets were purchased in connection with the weighted average rateasset acquisition from CBAM in March 2022 (see Note 4). The formation date listed is the original formation date of the underlying senior notes.related CLO.
(5)Original borrowing of €61.8 million; incurs interest at EURIBOR plus applicable margins as defined in the agreement.
(6)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.932%.
(7)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.923%.
(8)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.536%.
(9)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.808%.
(10)Original borrowing of €17.4 million; incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% and has full recourse to the Partnership.
(11)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.848%.
(12)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.7312%.
(13)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.647%.
(14)Incurs interest at LIBOR plus 1.365%.
(15)Term loan issued under master credit agreement.


The CLO term loans are secured by the Partnership'sCompany’s investments in the respective CLO, have a general unsecured interest in the Carlyle entity that manages the CLO, and generally do not have recourse to any other Carlyle entity. Interest expense on these term loans was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020 was $10.7 million, $5.6 million, and $8.5 million, respectively. The fair value of the outstanding balance of the CLO term loans at December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 approximated par value based on current market rates for similar debt instruments. These CLO term loans are classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy.


European CLO Financing - February 28, 2017

On February 28, 2017, a subsidiary of the PartnershipCompany entered into a financing agreement with several financial institutions under which these financial institutions provided a €61.8€36.1 million term loan ($74.338.7 million at December 31, 2017)2022) to the Partnership.Company. This term loan is secured by the Partnership’sCompany’s investments in the retained notes in certain European CLOs that were formed in 2014 and 2015. This term loan will mature on the earlier of September 21, 2029November 17, 2031 or the date that the certain European CLO retained notes have been redeemed. The PartnershipCompany may prepay the term loan in whole or in part at any time after the third anniversary of the date of issuance without penalty. Prepayment of the term loan within the first three years will

216


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


incur a penalty based on the prepayment amount.time. Interest on this term loan accrues at EURIBOR plus applicable margins (2.33%(2.40% at December 31, 2017)2022).


Master Credit Agreement - Term Loans

In January 2017, the PartnershipCompany entered into a master credit agreement with a financial institution under which the financial institution expects to provideprovided term loans to the PartnershipCompany for the purchase of eligible interests in CLOs. This agreement will terminate in January 2020. Any term loanTerm loans issued under this master credit agreement iswere secured by the Partnership’sCompany’s investment in the respective CLO as well as any senior management fee and subordinated management fee payable by each CLO. Any term loan bearsTerm loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread over LIBOR on the CLO notes and an applicable margin. Interestmargin, which is due quarterly. CLO Indentures for the respective CLO borrowings entered on November 30, 2017 and after provide for an alternative rate framework determined at the Company’s discretion upon a trigger event of LIBOR. This agreement terminated in January 2020. All outstanding CLO term loans under this agreement were fully repaid in 2021.

The Company assumed liabilities under master credit agreements previously entered into by CBAM under which a financial institution provided term loans to CBAM for the purchase of eligible interests in CLOs (see Note 4). Term loans issued under these master credit agreements are secured by the Company’s investment in the respective CLO as well as any senior management fee and subordinated management fee payable by each CLO. Term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread over LIBOR on the CLO notes, which is due quarterly. As of December 31, 2022, term loans under these agreements had $98.6 million outstanding. The master credit agreements mature in July 2030 and January 2031, respectively.
3.875%        CLO Repurchase Agreements
    On February 5, 2019, the Company entered into a master credit facility agreement (the “Carlyle CLO Financing Facility”) to finance a portion of the risk retention investments in certain European CLOs managed by the Company. The initial maximum facility amount is €100.0 million, which has been, and may further be, expanded on such terms agreed upon by the Company and the counterparty subject to the terms and conditions of the Carlyle CLO Financing Facility. Each transaction entered into under the Carlyle CLO Financing Facility will bear interest at a rate based on the weighted average effective interest rate of each class of securities that have been sold plus a spread to be agreed upon by the parties. As of December 31, 2022, €203.6 million ($218.0 million) was outstanding under the Carlyle CLO Financing Facility.
The Company assumed liabilities under a master credit facility agreement previously entered into by CBAM (the “CBAM CLO Financing Facility,” together with the Carlyle CLO Financing Facility, the “CLO Financing Facilities”) to finance a portion of the risk retention investments in certain European CLOs managed by CBAM (see Note 4). The maximum facility amount is €100.0 million, but may be expanded on such terms agreed upon by the Company and the counterparty subject to the terms and conditions of the CBAM CLO Financing Facility. Each transaction entered into under the CBAM CLO Financing Facility will bear interest at a rate based on the weighted average effective interest rate of each class of securities that
208

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
have been sold plus a spread to be agreed upon by the parties. As of December 31, 2022, €61.9 million ($66.3 million) was outstanding under the CBAM CLO Financing Facility.
        Each transaction entered into under the CLO Financing Facility provides for payment netting and, in the case of a default or similar event with respect to the counterparty to the CLO Financing Facility, provides for netting across transactions. Generally, upon a counterparty default, the Company can terminate all transactions under the CLO Financing Facility and offset amounts it owes in respect of any one transaction against collateral, if any, or other amounts it has received in respect of any other transactions under the CLO Financing Facility; provided, however, that in the case of certain defaults, the Company may only be able to terminate and offset solely with respect to the transaction affected by the default. During the term of a transaction entered into under the CLO Financing Facility, the Company will deliver cash or additional securities acceptable to the counterparty if the securities sold are in default. Upon termination of a transaction, the Company will repurchase the previously sold securities from the counterparty at a previously determined repurchase price. The CLO Financing Facility may be terminated at any time upon certain defaults or circumstances agreed upon by the parties.
    The repurchase agreements may result in credit exposure in the event the counterparty to the transaction is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations. The Company minimizes the credit risk associated with these activities by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral values. Other than margin requirements, the Company is not subject to additional terms or contingencies which would expose the Company to additional obligations based upon the performance of the securities pledged as collateral.
    Senior Notes
In    Certain indirect subsidiaries of the Company have issued long term borrowings in the form of senior notes, on which interest is payable semi-annually in arrears. The following table provides information regarding these senior notes (Dollars in millions):
Aggregate Principal AmountInterest Expense
Fair Value(1)
As of December 31,
For The Years Ended December 31,
20222021202220212020
3.875% Senior Notes Due 2/1/2023 (2)
$— $— $— $— $8.9 $9.9 
5.625% Senior Notes Due 3/30/2043 (3)
600.0 545.8 795.5 33.7 33.7 33.8 
5.650% Senior Notes Due 9/15/2048 (4)
350.0 322.2 484.7 19.9 19.9 19.9 
3.500% Senior Notes Due 9/19/2029 (5)
425.0 364.1 457.4 15.3 15.3 15.3 
$68.9 $77.8 $78.9 

(1) Including accrued interest. Fair value is based on indicative quotes and the notes are classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy.
(2) Issued in January 2013 an indirect finance subsidiaryat 99.966% of par. In November 2021, the Partnership issued $500.0Company completed the redemption of these notes, as discussed below.
(3) Issued $400.0 million in aggregate principal amountat 99.583% of 3.875%par in March 2013. An additional $200.0 million in aggregate principal was issued at 104.315% of par in March 2014, and is treated as a single class with the outstanding $400.0 million in senior notes due February 1, 2023previously issued.
(4) Issued in September 2018 at 99.966%99.914% of par. Interest is payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1, beginning August 1, 2013. This subsidiary
(5) Issued in September 2019 at 99.841% of par.
    The issuers may redeem the senior notes, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on any notes being redeemed discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annualsemiannual basis at the Treasury rateRate plus 3040 basis points (30 basis points in the case of the 3.875% and 3.500% senior notes), plus in each case accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amounts being redeemed. In November 2021, the Company redeemed to the redemption date.
Interest expense on the notes was $19.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of the notes, including accrued interest, was approximately $520.4 million and $512.8 million, respectively, based on indicative quotes. The notes are classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy.
5.625% Senior Notes
In March 2013, an indirect finance subsidiary of the Partnership issued $400.0 million inremaining aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior$250.0 million in 3.875% Senior Notes at the make-whole redemption price as set forth in the notes, and recognized $10.1 million of costs in interest expense upon early extinguishment of the debt.
209

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Subordinated Notes
In May 2021, an indirect subsidiary of the Company issued $435.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625% Subordinated Notes due March 30, 2043 at 99.583% of par. InterestMay 15, 2061 (the “Subordinated Notes”), on which interest is payable semi-annuallyquarterly accruing from May 11, 2021. In June 2021, an additional $65.0 million aggregate principal amount of these Subordinated Notes were issued and are treated as a single series with the already outstanding $435.0 million aggregate principal amount. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured and subordinated obligations of the issuer, and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantees”), jointly and severally, on March 30a subordinated basis, by the Company, each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, and September 30, beginning September 30, 2013. ThisCG Subsidiary Holdings L.L.C., an indirect subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the “Guarantors”). The Consolidated Funds are not guarantors, and as such, the assets of the Consolidated Funds are not available to service the Subordinated Notes under the Guarantee. The Subordinated Notes may redeembe redeemed at the senior notesissuer’s option in whole at any time or in part from time to time on or after June 15, 2026 at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the greaterdate of 100%redemption. If interest due on the Subordinated Notes is deemed no longer to be deductible in the U.S., a “Tax Redemption Event,” the Subordinated Notes may be redeemed, in whole, but not in part, within 120 days of the occurrence of such event at a redemption price equal to their principal amount of the notes being redeemed and the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on any notes being redeemed discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury rate plus 40 basis points plus accrued and unpaid interest onto, but excluding, the principal amounts beingdate of redemption. In addition, the Subordinated Notes may be redeemed, in whole, but not in part, at any time prior to May 15, 2026, within 90 days of the rating agencies determining that the Subordinated Notes should no longer receive partial equity treatment pursuant to the rating agency’s criteria, a “rating agency event,” at a redemption date.
In March 2014, an indirect finance subsidiaryprice equal to 102% of the Partnership issued $200.0 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due March 30, 2043 at 104.315% of par. These notes were issued as additional 5.625% Senior Notes and will be treated as a single class with the already outstanding $400.0 million aggregatetheir principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of these senior notes.redemption.
Interest expense on the notes was $33.7 million for the years endedAs of December 31, 2017, 20162022 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016,2021, the fair value of the notes, including accrued interest,Subordinated Notes was approximately $696.3$323.8 million and $603.1$506.0 million, respectively,respectively. Fair value is based on indicative quotes. Theactive market quotes and the notes are classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy.
Promissory Notes
Promissory Note Due January 1, 2022
On January 1, 2016, the Partnership issued a $120.0 million promissory note to BNRI as a result of a contingent consideration arrangement entered into in 2012 between the Partnership and BNRI as part of the Partnership's strategic investment in NGP (see Note 5). Interest on the promissory note accrues at the three month LIBOR plus 2.50% (4.19% at December 31, 2017). The Partnership may prepay the promissory note in whole or in part at any time without penalty. The promissory note is scheduled to mature on January 1, 2022. Interest expense on the promissory note was not significant for For the year ended December 31, 2017. The fair value2022, the Company incurred $23.5 million of interest expense on the outstanding balance ofSubordinated Notes. For the promissory note atperiod from May 11, 2021 through December 31, 2017 approximated par value based on current market rates for similar debt instruments and is classified as Level III within2021, the fair value hierarchy.
In December 2016, the Partnership repurchased $11.2Company incurred $14.8 million of the promissory note for a purchase price of approximately $9.0 million. Approximately $108.8 million of the promissory note is outstanding at December 31, 2017.

217


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Promissory Notes Due July 15, 2019

In June 2017, as part of the settlement with investors in two commodities investment vehicles managed by an affiliate of the Partnership (disclosed in Note 9), the Partnership issued a series of promissory notes, aggregating to $53.9 million, to the investors of these commodities investment vehicles. Interest on these promissory notes accrues at the three month LIBOR plus 2% (3.36% at December 31, 2017). The Partnership may prepay these promissory notes in whole or in part at any time without penalty. In October 2017, the Partnership repaid $6.7 million of these promissory notes. Accordingly, $47.2 million of these promissory notes are outstanding at December 31, 2017. These promissory notes are scheduled to mature on July 15, 2019. Interestinterest expense on these promissory notes was not significant for the year ended December 31, 2017. The fair value of the outstanding balance of these promissory notes at December 31, 2017 approximated par value based on current market rates for similar debt instruments and is classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy.Subordinated Notes.
Debt Covenants
The PartnershipCompany is subject to various financial covenants under its loan agreements including, among other items, maintenance of a minimum amount of management fee-earning assets. The PartnershipCompany is also subject to various non-financial covenants under its loan agreements and the indentures governing its senior notes. The PartnershipCompany was in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants under its various loan agreements as of December 31, 2017.2022.


Loans Payable of Consolidated Funds
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds primarily represent amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by the CLOs. Several of the CLOs issued preferred shares representing the most subordinated interest, however these tranches are mandatorily redeemable upon the maturity dates of the senior secured loans payable, and as a result have been classified as liabilities and are included in loans payable of Consolidated Funds in the consolidated balance sheets.
As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the following borrowings were outstanding which includes preferred shares classified as liabilities (Dollars in millions):
 As of December 31, 2017
 Borrowing
Outstanding
 Fair Value Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Maturity in
Years
Senior secured notes$4,128.3
 $4,100.5
 2.16% 
 11.44
Subordinated notes, preferred shares, and other195.2
 203.3
 N/A
 (a) 9.85
Total$4,323.5
 $4,303.8
      
 As of December 31, 2022
 Borrowing
Outstanding
Fair ValueWeighted
Average
Interest Rate
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Maturity in
Years
Senior secured notes (1)
$5,849.2 $5,303.3 3.97 %9.48
Subordinated notes234.0 188.3 N/A(2)9.69
Total$6,083.2 $5,491.6 
 
 As of December 31, 2021
 Borrowing
Outstanding
Fair ValueWeighted
Average
Interest Rate
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Maturity in
Years
Senior secured notes$5,585.4 $5,561.1 1.68 %10.25
Subordinated notes317.6 249.9 N/A(2)10.41
Total$5,903.0 $5,811.0 
210

 As of December 31, 2016
 Borrowing
Outstanding
 Fair Value Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Maturity in
Years
Senior secured notes$3,681.0
 $3,672.5
 2.45% 
 10.22
Subordinated notes, preferred shares, and other195.6
 193.8
 N/A
 (a) 9.26
Total$3,876.6
 $3,866.3
      
The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
(a)The subordinated notes and preferred shares do not have contractual interest rates, but instead receive distributions from the excess cash flows of the CLOs.
(1)Borrowing Outstanding as of December 31, 2022 includes $235.6 million of senior secured notes that are carried at par value. The fair value of these senior secured notes at December 31, 2022 approximated par value based on current market rates for similar debt instruments. These senior secured notes are classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy.
(2)The subordinated notes do not have contractual interest rates, but instead receive distributions from the excess cash flows of the CLOs.
Loans payable of the CLOs are collateralized by the assets held by the CLOs and the assets of one CLO may not be used to satisfy the liabilities of another. This collateral consisted of cash and cash equivalents, corporate loans, corporate bonds and other securities. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the fair value of the CLO assets was $4.9$6.2 billion and $4.7$6.7 billion, respectively.


218


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


8.9. Accrued Compensation and Benefits
Accrued compensation and benefits consist of the following:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Accrued performance allocations and incentive fee-related compensation$3,625.3 $4,087.8 
Accrued bonuses466.6 521.4 
Employment-based contingent cash consideration(1)
76.5 6.3 
Accrued pension liability9.5 27.4 
Other(2)
143.0 312.1 
Total$4,320.9 $4,955.0 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Accrued performance fee-related compensation$1,894.8
 $1,307.4
Accrued bonuses202.6
 177.2
Other125.2
 177.2
Total$2,222.6
 $1,661.8
(1) The acquisition of the Carlyle Aviation Partners, Ltd. (“Carlyle Aviation Partners,” formerly known as Apollo Aviation Group) in December 2018 included an earn-out of up to $150.0 million that is payable upon the achievement of certain revenue and earnings performance targets during 2020 through 2025, which is accounted for as compensation expense. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on the Carlyle Aviation Partners acquisition. The Abingworth acquisition included an earn-out of up to $130.0 million. See Note 4 for additional information.
(2) Includes $26.7 million and $207.0 million of realized performance allocations and incentive fee-related compensation not yet paid to participants as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The following table presents realized and unrealized performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation:
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Realized$1,026.4 $1,414.5 $337.2 
Unrealized(306.5)1,546.5 441.9 
Total$719.9 $2,961.0 $779.1 
Certain employees of AlpInvest are covered by defined benefit pension plans sponsored by AlpInvest. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the benefit obligation of those pension plans totaled approximately $73.4$60.6 million and $61.9$96.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the fair value of the plans’ assets was approximately $56.3$51.1 million and $46.3$68.9 million, respectively. At December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the PartnershipCompany recognized a liability of $17.1$9.5 million and $15.6$27.4 million, respectively, representing the funded status of the plans, which was included in accrued compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the net periodic benefit cost recognized was $4.2$4.1 million, $2.5$6.1 million and $2.8$5.5 million, respectively, which is included in basecash-based compensation and benefits expense (for the service cost component) and other non-operating expenses (for non-service cost components) in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. No other employees of the PartnershipCompany are covered by defined benefit pension plans.
211


The Carlyle Group Inc.
9.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Capital Commitments
The PartnershipCompany and its unconsolidated affiliates have unfunded commitments to entities within the following segments as of December 31, 20172022 (Dollars in millions):
 Unfunded
 Commitments
Corporate Private Equity$2,354.2
Real Assets812.0
Global Credit526.0
Investment Solutions146.5
Total$3,838.7
Unfunded
Commitments
Global Private Equity$3,300.0 
Global Credit389.0 
Global Investment Solutions260.9 
Total$3,949.9 
Of the $3.8$3.9 billion of unfunded commitments, approximately $3.4$3.2 billion is subscribed individually by senior Carlyle professionals, advisors and other professionals, with the balance funded directly by the Partnership.Company. In addition to these unfunded commitments, the PartnershipCompany may from time to time exercise its right to purchase additional interests in its investment funds that become available in the ordinary course of their operations.
Guaranteed Loans
On August 4, 2001,Under the Partnership entered into an agreement with a financial institution pursuant to which the Partnership is the guarantor on a credit facility for eligible employees investing in Carlyle sponsored funds. This credit facility renews on an annual basis, allowing for annual incremental borrowings up to an aggregate of $11.3 million, and accrues interest at the lowerGlobal Capital Markets platform, certain subsidiaries of the prime rate,Company may act as defined,an underwriter, syndicator or three-month LIBOR plus 3%, reset quarterly (4.34% weighted-average rate at December 31, 2017).placement agent for security offerings and loan originations. The Company earns fees in connection with these activities and bears the risk of the sale of such securities and placement of such loans, which may be longer dated. As of December 31, 20172022, certain subsidiaries of the Company had €20.0 million ($21.4 million) in commitments related to the origination and 2016, approximately $13.3 millionsyndication of loans and $9.6 million, respectively, were outstandingsecurities under the Carlyle Global Capital Markets platform, which were extinguished in January 2023.
Guaranteed Loans
    From time to time, the Company or its subsidiaries may enter into agreements to guarantee certain obligations of the investment funds related to, for example, credit facility and payable by the employees. The amount funded by the Partnership under this guarantee as of December 31, 2017 was not material. The Partnership believes the likelihood of any material funding under this guarantee to be remote. The fair value of this guarantee is not significant to the consolidated financial statements.

facilities or equity commitments. Certain consolidated subsidiaries of the PartnershipCompany are the guarantorguarantors of revolving credit facilities for certain funds in the Global Investment Solutions segment. The guarantee is limited to the lesser of the total amount drawn under the credit facilities or

219


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


the NAVnet asset value of the guarantor subsidiaries, which was approximately $7.3$4.5 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. The outstanding balances are secured by uncalled capital commitments from the underlying funds and the PartnershipCompany believes the likelihood of any material funding under this guarantee to be remote.
Contingent Obligations (Giveback)
A liability for potential repayment of previously received performance feesallocations of $66.8$40.9 million at December 31, 2017,2022, is shown as accrued giveback obligations in the consolidated balance sheets, representing the giveback obligation that would need to be paid if the funds were liquidated at their current fair values at December 31, 2017.2022. However, the ultimate giveback obligation, if any, generally is not paid until the end of a fund’s life or earlier if the giveback becomes fixed and early payment is agreed upon by the fund'sfund’s partners (see Note 2)3). The PartnershipCompany has recorded $5.1$10.4 million and $5.6 million of unbilled receivables from former and current employees and senior Carlyle professionals as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively,2022 related to giveback obligations, which are included in due from affiliates and other receivables, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Theobligations. There were no such amounts receivable as of December 31, 2021. Any such receivables are collateralized by investments made by individual senior Carlyle professionals and employees in Carlyle-sponsored funds. In addition, $247.6$135.9 million and $356.9$153.3 million have been withheld from distributions of carried interest to senior Carlyle professionals and employees for potential giveback obligations as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Such amounts are held on behalf of the respective current and former Carlyle employees to satisfy any givebacks they may owe and are held by entities not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Current and former senior Carlyle professionals and employees are personally responsible for their giveback obligations. As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately $37.9$18.9 million of the Partnership'sCompany’s accrued giveback obligation is the responsibility of various current and former senior Carlyle professionals and other former limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, and the net accrued giveback obligation attributable to Carlyle Holdingsthe Company is $28.9$22.0 million.
If, at December 31, 2017,2022, all of the investments held by the Partnership’sCompany’s Funds were deemed worthless, a possibility that management views as remote, the amount of realized and distributed carried interest subject to potential giveback would be $0.7
212

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
$1.5 billion, on an after-tax basis where applicable.applicable, of which approximately $0.7 billion would be the responsibility of current and former senior Carlyle professionals.
Leases
The PartnershipCompany’s leases primarily consist of operating leases for office space in various countries around the world, and maintainsincluding its headquarterslargest offices in Washington, D.C., where itNew York City, London and Hong Kong. These leases have remaining lease terms of one year to 14 years, some of which include options to extend for up to 5 years and some of which include an option to terminate the leases within one year. The Company also has operating leases for office equipment and vehicles, which are not significant.
The Company assesses its primarylease right-of-use assets for impairment consistent with its impairment assessment of other long-lived assets. In connection with the April 1, 2021 sale of Metropolitan Real Estate, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for a portion of its existing office space underin New York. As a non-cancelableresult of the sublease transaction, the Company recorded a lease agreement expiring on Julyimpairment charge of $26.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2026. Office2021, which was the excess of the carrying value of the associated lease right-of-use asset over its estimated fair value. The Company estimated the fair value using discounted cash flows from the estimated net sublease rental income. The impairment charge is included in general, administrative, and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes the Company’s lease cost, cash flows and other supplemental information related to its operating leases (Dollars in other locations expiremillions):
Year Ended December 31,
20222021
Operating lease cost$56.3 $55.5 
Sublease income(6.0)(3.5)
   Total operating lease cost$50.3 $52.0 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities$64.1 $50.8 
Weighted-average remaining lease term10.812.0
Weighted-average discount rate4.2 %4.1 %

Maturities of lease liabilities related to operating leases were as follows (Dollars in various years from 2018 through 2032. These leases are accounted for as operating leases. millions):
Year ending December 31,
2023$68.1 
202464.5 
202560.5 
202658.3 
202759.0 
Thereafter339.2 
Total lease payments$649.6 
Less payments for leases that have not yet commenced(28.4)
Less imputed interest(118.3)
Total lease liabilities$502.9 

Rent expense was approximately $56.6$56.3 million, $55.0$55.5 million and $56.3$47.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, and is included in general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The future minimum commitments for the leases are as follows (Dollars in millions):
213
  
2018$47.9
201948.9
202048.4
202144.1
202241.0
Thereafter295.7
 $526.0
The Partnership records contractual escalating minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Deferred rent payable under the leases was $62.9 million and $60.3 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

220


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Legal Matters
In the ordinary course of business, the PartnershipCompany is a party to litigation, investigations, inquiries, employment-related matters, disputes and other potential claims. Certain of these matters are described below. The PartnershipCompany is not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible amount of loss or range of loss, in excess of amounts accrued, for the matters that have not been resolved. The PartnershipCompany does not believe it is probable that the outcome of any existing litigation, investigations, disputes or other potential claims will materially affect the PartnershipCompany or these financial statements in excess of amounts accrued. The PartnershipCompany believes that the claims assertedalleged against the Partnershipit in the pending litigation matters described below are without meritmerit.
The Authentix Matter
Authentix, Inc. (“Authentix”) was a majority-owned portfolio company in one of the Company’s investment funds, Carlyle U.S. Growth Fund III, L.P. (“CGF III”). When Authentix was owned by CGF III, two of the Company’s employees served on Authentix’s board of directors. After a lengthy sale process, Authentix was sold for an aggregate sale price of $87.5 million. On August 7, 2020, certain of the former minority shareholders in Authentix filed suit in Delaware Chancery Court, alleging that the Authentix board of directors, CGF III, and intendsthe Company breached various fiduciary duties by agreeing to vigorouslya sale of Authentix at an inopportune time and at a price that was too low. Plaintiffs seek damages for a portion of the lost profits from the sale—the difference between the actual sale price and the purported maximum amount for which Authentix could have sold, multiplied by Plaintiff’s ownership percentage. Plaintiffs also seek disgorgement of any profits received by the Company stemming from the sale. A trial is scheduled to begin in Delaware in October 2023. The former directors of Authentix are covered by indemnification from Authentix and an Authentix insurance policy. The defendants intend to contest such allegations.the claims vigorously.
Along with many other companies and individualsThe Tax Receivable Agreement Matter
The Company came into existence on January 1, 2020, when its predecessor, The Carlyle Group, L.P. (the “PTP”), converted from a partnership into a corporation (the “Conversion”). On July 29, 2022, an alleged stockholder of the Company, the City of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Municipal Trust Fund (the “Plaintiff”), filed suit in the financial sector,Delaware Court of Chancery, alleging a direct claim against the PartnershipCompany for breach of its certificate of incorporation and Carlyle Mezzanine Partners, L.P. (“CMP”) are named as defendants in Foy v. Austin Capital, a case filed in June 2009 in state court in New Mexico, which purports to be a qui tam suitderivative claim on behalf of the State of New Mexico under the state Fraud Against Taxpayers Act (“FATA”). The suit alleges that investment decisions by New Mexico public investment funds were improperly influenced by campaign contributionsCompany against certain current and payments to politically connected placement agents. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, actual damages for lost income, rescissionformer officers and directors of the investment transactions described inCompany. Plaintiff challenges the complaintreceipt, by certain officers of the PTP and disgorgement of all fees received. In September 2017, the Court dismissed the lawsuit and the plaintiffs then filed an appeal seeking to reverse that decision. The Attorney General may also pursue its own recovery from the defendants in the action.
Carlyle Capital Corporation Limited (“CCC”) was a fund sponsored by the Partnership that invested in AAA-rated residential mortgage backed securities on a highly leveraged basis. In March of 2008, amidst turmoil throughout the mortgage markets and money markets, CCC filed for insolvency protection in Guernsey. The Guernsey liquidators who took control of CCC in March 2008 filed a suit on July 7, 2010 against the Partnership, certain of its affiliates and the former directors of CCC in the Royal Court of Guernsey seeking more than $1.0 billion in damages in a case styled Carlyle Capital Corporation Limited v. Conway et al. On September 4, 2017, the Royal Court of Guernsey ruled that the Partnership and Directors of CCC acted reasonably and appropriately in the management and governance of CCC and that nonegeneral partner of the Partnership, its affiliates or former directorsPTP, of CCC had any liability. In December 2017,a right to cash payments associated with the plaintiff filedelimination of a notice of appeal oftax receivable agreement in connection with the trial court decision and the PartnershipConversion. Plaintiff is preparing its response. The Partnership may be entitled to receive additional amounts from the plaintiff as reimbursement of legal fees and expenses incurred to defend against the claims. In December 2017, the Partnership received approximately $29.8 million from the plaintiff as a deposit towards its obligations to reimburse the Partnership for such expenses, but such amount is subject to repayment pending a final determination of the correct reimbursement amount and the ultimate outcome of the appeal process.
Cobalt International Energy, Inc. ("Cobalt") was a portfolio company owned by two of our Legacy Energy funds and funds advised by certain other private equity sponsors.  Cobalt filed for bankruptcy protection on December 14, 2017.  A federal securities class action against Cobalt (In re Cobalt International Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation) was filed in November 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, seeking monetary damages, restitution, and alleging that Cobalt and its directors made misrepresentations in certain of Cobalt’s securities offering filings relating to:  (i)an injunction preventing the value of oil reserves in Angola for which Cobalt had acquired drilling concessions, and (ii) its compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act regarding its operations in Angola and a U.S. government investigation regarding the same.  The securities class action also named as co-defendants certain securities underwriters and the five private equity sponsors of Cobalt, including Riverstone and the Partnership.  The class action alleged that the Partnership has liability as a "control person"Company from making any future cash payments for the alleged misrepresentations in Cobalt's securities offerings as well as insider trading liability.  The federal court dismissed the insider trading claim against the Partnership.  In addition to the class action in federal court, a class action claim was also filed in Texas state court in Houston (Ira Gaines v. Joseph Bryant, et al.) on similar grounds, alleging derivative claims that Cobalt and the private equity sponsors breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in insider trading. No Partnership employee served as a director or executive of Cobalt, and we vigorously contest all allegations made against the Partnership.
From 2007 to 2009, a Luxembourg subsidiary of CEREP I, a real estate fund, received proceeds from the sale of real estate located in Paris, France. Based on a provision in the Luxembourg-France tax treaty, it did not report or pay tax in France on gain from the sale. The French tax authorities asserted that CEREP I was ineligible to claim exemptions from French tax under the tax treaty, and issued a tax assessment seeking to collect taxes, interest and penalties. In April 2015, the French tax court issued an opinion in this matter that was adverse to CEREP I, holding the Luxembourg property company liable for approximately €105 million (including interest accrued since the beginningelimination of the tax dispute). CEREP I paid approximately €30 millionreceivable agreement in connection with the Conversion. By virtue of the tax obligationsderivative nature of the primary claims (i.e., that the claims are aimed primarily at certain officers and directors), it is remote that the Partnership paidCompany itself will pay material damage awards based on the remaining approximately €75 millionPlaintiff’s claims, although the Company is expected to incur legal defense fees to the extent not covered by insurance. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 28, 2022. The Plaintiff amended its complaint on January 31, 2023. The officer and director defendants intend to contest the claims vigorously.
SEC Investigation
As part of a sweep investigation of financial services and investment advisory firms, in its capacity asOctober 2022, the Company received from the SEC a guarantor.request for information related to the preservation of certain types of electronic business communications (e.g., text messages and messages on WhatsApp, WeChat, and similar applications). The Partnership disagreedCompany intends to cooperate fully with the outcome and filed a petition of appeal. In December 2017, the Partnership was successful on its appeal, with the French appellate court reversing the earlier tax court opinion and awarding the Partnership a

221


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


refund of the full €105 million of tax and penalties (inclusive of amounts paid by CEREP I) and awarding interest on the refund (which is estimated to be approximately €12.5 million, before tax). The appellate decision remains subject to the possibility of a further appeal, but the French tax authorities have not given notice as to whether they will pursue such a further appeal. Pending receipt of the refund and a final determination on any further appeal, the Partnership has not recognized income in respect of the refund as of December 31, 2017.

SEC’s inquiry.
The PartnershipCompany currently is and expects to continue to be, from time to time, subject to examinations, formal and informal inquiries and investigations by various U.S. and non-U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, including but not limited to, the SEC, Department of Justice, state attorneys general, FINRA, National Futures Association and the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority. The PartnershipCompany routinely cooperates with such examinations, inquiries and investigations, and they may result in the commencement of civil, criminal, or administrative or other proceedings against the PartnershipCompany or its personnel. For example, among various other requests for information, the SEC has requested information about: (i) the Partnership's historical practices relating to the acceleration of monitoring fees received from certain of the Partnership's funds' portfolio companies, and (ii) the Partnership's relationship with a third-party investment adviser to a registered investment company that has invested in various investment funds sponsored by the Partnership. The Partnership is cooperating fully with the SEC's inquiries.

During the year, the Partnership entered into settlement and purchase agreements with investors in a hedge fund and two structured finance vehicles managed by Vermillion related to investments of approximately $400 million in petroleum commodities that the Partnership believes were misappropriated by third parties outside the U.S.  In total, the Partnership paid $265 million ($165 million of which was paid in 2017 with the remaining $100 million paid in 2016) to fully resolve all claims related to these matters and issued promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $54 million to repurchase the investors' interests in the two structured finance vehicles. In connection with these settlements, the Partnership also acquired certain rights to receive a portion of any proceeds obtained from marine cargo insurance policies and other efforts to pursue reimbursement for the misappropriation of petroleum. In the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership recognized $177 million, net of related recovery costs, in general liability insurance proceeds related to these settlements.
It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of all pending investigations and legal proceedings and employment-related matters, and some of the matters discussed above involve claims for potentially large and/or indeterminate amounts of damages. Based on information known by management, management does not believe that as of the date of this filing the final resolutions of the matters above will have a material effect upon the Partnership’s condensedCompany’s consolidated financial statements. However, given the potentially large and/or indeterminate amounts of damages sought in certain of these matters and the inherent
214

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
unpredictability of investigations and litigations, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material effect on the Partnership'sCompany’s financial results in any particular period.
The PartnershipCompany accrues an estimated loss contingency liability when it is probable that such a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the PartnershipCompany had recorded liabilities aggregating to approximately $35 million for litigation-related contingencies, regulatory examinations and inquiries, and other matters. The PartnershipCompany evaluates its outstanding legal and regulatory proceedings and other matters each quarter to assess its loss contingency accruals, and makes adjustments in such accruals, upward or downward, as appropriate, based on management'smanagement’s best judgment after consultation with counsel. There is no assurance that the Partnership'sCompany’s accruals for loss contingencies will not need to be adjusted in the future or that, in light of the uncertainties involved in such matters, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the accruals that the PartnershipCompany has recorded.

Transaction with Claren Road
On December 12, 2016, the Partnership signed an agreement with the founders of Claren Road Asset Management, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Claren Road”) to transfer all of the Partnership's 63% ownership interest in Claren Road to its founders. As a result of the transaction, the Partnership is also relieved of all of its obligations under the 2010 acquisition agreement, including any potential future obligations thereunder. This transaction closed on January 31, 2017. The Partnership recorded additional base compensation expense of approximately $25.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 associated with the transfer of the interests to Claren Road in addition to the disposition of approximately $4.4 million of intangible assets and approximately $10.8 million of potential future obligations. The remaining income before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 was not material. Claren Road was part of the Partnership's Global Credit segment.

222


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements



Transaction with ESG

On October 31, 2016, the Partnership closed a transaction with the founders of Emerging Sovereign Group and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively,“ESG”) and transferred the Partnership's 55% ownership interest in ESG to its founders. Prior to the transaction closing, the carrying value of the contingent consideration liability for the Partnership's obligation to purchase the 45% ownership interest in 2020 (or after) was $49.5 million (substantially all of which was included in accrued compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet) and the Partnership also had $22.4 million of intangible assets and $28.0 million of goodwill related to its 2011 acquisition of its 55% ownership interest in ESG as of October 31, 2016, all of which was disposed of upon the transaction closing. ESG's income before provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 was not material to the Partnership's consolidated financial statements. There was no material gain or loss associated with the transfer of the interests to ESG. ESG was part of the Partnership's Global Credit segment.
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the PartnershipCompany and its subsidiaries enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide general indemnifications. The Partnership’sCompany’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the PartnershipCompany that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the PartnershipCompany believes the risk of material loss to be remote.
In connection with the sale of the Company’s interest in its local Brazilian management entity in August 2021, the Company provided a guarantee to the acquiring company of up to BRL 100.0 million ($18.9 million as of December 31, 2022) for liabilities arising from tax-related indemnifications. This guarantee, which will expire in August 2027, would only come into effect after all alternative remedies have been exhausted. The Company believes the likelihood of any material funding under this guarantee to be remote.
Risks and Uncertainties
Carlyle’s funds seek investment opportunities that offer the possibility of attaining substantial capital appreciation. Certain events particular to each industry in which the underlying investees conduct their operations, as well as general economic, political, regulatory and public health conditions, may have a significant negative impact on the Partnership’sCompany’s investments and profitability. The funds managed by the Company may also experience a slowdown in the deployment of capital, which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital for new or successor funds and could also impact the management fees the Company earns on its carry funds and managed accounts. Such events are beyond the Partnership’sCompany’s control, and the likelihood that they may occur and the effect on the PartnershipCompany cannot be predicted.
Furthermore, certain of the funds’ investments are made in private companies and there are generally no public markets for the underlying securities at the current time. The funds’ ability to liquidate their publicly-traded investments are often subject to limitations, including discounts that may be required to be taken on quoted prices due to the number of shares being sold. The funds’ ability to liquidate their investments and realize value is subject to significant limitations and uncertainties, including among others currency fluctuations and natural disasters.
The PartnershipCompany and the funds make investments outside of the United States. Investments outside the United States may be subject to less developed bankruptcy, corporate, partnership and other laws (which may have the effect of disregarding or otherwise circumventing the limited liability structures potentially causing the actions or liabilities of one fund or a portfolio company to adversely impact the PartnershipCompany or an unrelated fund or portfolio company). Non-U.S. investments are subject to the same risks associated with the Partnership’sCompany’s U.S. investments as well as additional risks, such as fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, heightened risk of political and economic instability, difficulties in managing non-U.S. investments, potentially adverse tax consequences and the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
Furthermore, Carlyle is exposed to economic risk concentrations related to certain large investments as well as concentrations of investments in certain industries and geographies.
Additionally, the PartnershipCompany encounters credit risk. Credit risk is the risk of default by a counterparty in the Partnership’sCompany’s investments in debt securities, loans, leases and derivatives that result from a borrower’s, lessee’s or derivative counterparty’s inability or unwillingness to make required or expected payments.
215

The PartnershipCarlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company considers cash, cash equivalents, securities, receivables, principal equity method investments, accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities, loans, senior notes, assets and liabilities of Consolidated Funds and contingent and other consideration for acquisitions to be its financial instruments. Except for the senior notes and subordinated notes, the carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for these financial instruments equal or closely approximate their fair values. The fair value of the senior and subordinated notes is disclosed in Note 7.8.


223


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


10.11. Related Party Transactions

Due from Affiliates and Other Receivables, Net
The PartnershipCompany had the following due from affiliates and other receivables at December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Accrued incentive fees$16.4 $12.2 
Unbilled receivable for giveback obligations from current and former employees10.4 — 
Notes receivable and accrued interest from affiliates41.5 25.3 
Management fee, reimbursable expenses and other receivables from unconsolidated funds and affiliates, net511.1 342.1 
Total$579.4 $379.6 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Unbilled receivable for giveback obligations from current and former employees$5.1
 $5.6
Notes receivable and accrued interest from affiliates22.8
 37.6
Other receivables from unconsolidated funds and affiliates, net229.2
 184.0
Total$257.1
 $227.2
Notes receivable represent loans that the Partnership has provided to certain unconsolidated funds to meet short-term obligations to purchase investments. OtherReimbursable expenses and other receivables from certain of the unconsolidated funds and portfolio companies relate to management fees receivable from limited partners, advisory fees receivable and expenses paid on behalf of these entities. These costs represent costs related to the pursuit of actual or proposed investments, professional fees and expenses associated with the acquisition, holding and disposition of the investments. The affiliates are obligated at the discretion of the PartnershipCompany to reimburse the expenses. Based on management’s determination, the PartnershipCompany accrues and charges interest on amounts due from affiliate accounts at interest rates ranging up to 7.07%7.02% as of December 31, 2017.2022. The accrued and charged interest to the affiliates was not significant for any period presented.
Notes receivable includes loans that the Company has provided to certain unconsolidated funds to meet short-term obligations to purchase investments. Notes receivable as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 also include interest-bearing loans of $23.2 million and $18.2 million, respectively, to certain eligible Carlyle employees, which excludes Section 16 officers and other members of senior management, to finance their investments in certain Carlyle sponsored funds. These advances accrue interest at the WSJ Prime Rate minus 1.00% floating with a floor rate of 3.50% (6.50% as of December 31, 2022) and are collateralized by each borrower’s interest in the Carlyle sponsored funds.
These receivables are assessed regularly for collectability and amounts determined to be uncollectible are charged directly to general, administrative and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. A corresponding allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded and such amounts were not significant for any period presented.
    
Due to Affiliates
The PartnershipCompany had the following due to affiliates balances at December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
 As of December 31,
 20222021
 (Dollars in millions)
Due to affiliates of Consolidated Funds$16.4 $— 
Due to non-consolidated affiliates87.1 60.5 
Amounts owed under the tax receivable agreement100.0 101.9 
Deferred consideration for Carlyle Holdings units134.4 200.5 
Other24.6 25.2 
Total$362.5 $388.1 
216

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Due to affiliates of Consolidated Funds$
 $0.2
Due to non-consolidated affiliates75.7
 29.7
Performance-based contingent cash consideration related to acquisitions37.5
 36.1
Amounts owed under the tax receivable agreement94.0
 137.8
Other22.7
 19.8
Total$229.9
 $223.6
The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The PartnershipCompany has recorded obligations for amounts due to certain of its affiliates. The PartnershipCompany periodically offsets expenses it has paid on behalf of its affiliates against these obligations. The amount owed under the tax receivable agreement is related primarily
Deferred consideration for Carlyle Holdings units relates to the acquisition byremaining obligation to the Partnershipholders of Carlyle Holdings partnership units in June 2015 and March 2014, respectively, the exchange in May 2012 by CalPERS of itswho will receive cash payments aggregating to $1.50 per Carlyle Holdings partnership unit exchanged in connection with the Conversion, payable in five annual installments of $0.30. The first four annual installment payments occurred in January in each of 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023. The obligation was initially recorded at fair value, net of a discount of $11.3 million and measured using Level III inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
In connection with the Company’s initial public offering, the Company entered into a tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships whereby certain subsidiaries of the Partnership agreed to pay to the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships involved in any exchange transaction 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax realized as a result of increases in tax basis resulting from exchanges of Carlyle Holdings Partnership units for Partnership common units as well as certain unit exchanges by seniorof The Carlyle professionals which began in 2017 (see Note 14).Group L.P.
Other Related Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, the PartnershipCompany has made use of aircraft owned by entities controlled by senior Carlyle professionals. The senior Carlyle professionals paid for their purchases of the aircraft and bear all operating, personnel and maintenance costs associated with their operation for personal use. Payment by the PartnershipCompany for the business use of these aircraft by senior Carlyle professionals and other employees which iswas made at market rates totaled $5.4 million, $4.8 million

224


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notesthroughout the year based on budgeted business usage. When actual business use exceeded budgeted aircraft use, the Company made additional payments to the Consolidated Financial Statements


aircraft owner and/or the aircraft management company, as appropriate. Similarly, when the aggregate amount paid for budgeted aircraft use exceeded the calculated costs of actual business use, or results in rates which exceed market aircraft charter rates, the Company receives reimbursement of such excess payments from the aircraft owner and/or the aircraft management company, as appropriate. These adjustments were calculated annually and $4.4 million forpayments or reimbursements were generally made after year-end. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, respectively. These2020 the Company made net payments of $0.7 million, received net reimbursements of $1.1 million and made net payments of $4.8 million, respectively, related to these aircraft lease agreements. The accrual of aircraft fees areis included in general, administrative, and other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company terminated its remaining aircraft lease agreement, and as of December 31, 2022, the Company had no active aircraft lease agreements. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had a reimbursement receivable of $0.4 million related to actual business usage and market rate adjustments, which was received in January 2023.
On May 5, 2020, the Company purchased 2,000,000 of the BDC Preferred Shares from CSL in a private placement at a price of $25 per share. Dividends are payable on a quarterly basis in an initial amount equal to 7.0% per annum payable in cash, or, at CSL’s option, 9.0% per annual payable in additional BDC Preferred Shares. The BDC Preferred Shares are convertible at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, into the number of shares of common stock equal to $25 per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends divided by an initial conversion price of $9.50 per share, subject to certain adjustments. At any time after May 5, 2023 and with the approval of its board of directors, CSL will have the option to redeem the BDC Preferred Shares, in whole or in part. In such case, the Company has the right to convert its shares, in whole or in part, prior to the date of redemption. The Company recorded dividend income of $3.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Dividend income from the BDC Preferred Shares is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s investment in the BDC Preferred Shares, which is recorded at fair value, is $76.9 million and $72.5 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and included in investments, including accrued performance allocations, in the consolidated balance sheets.
Senior Carlyle professionals and employees are permitted to participate in co-investment entities that invest in Carlyle funds or alongside Carlyle funds. In many cases, participation is limited by law to individuals who qualify under applicable legal requirements. These co-investment entities generally do not require senior Carlyle professionals and employees to pay management or performance fees,allocations, however, Carlyle professionals and employees are required to pay their portion of partnership expenses.
Carried interest income from thecertain funds can be distributed to senior Carlyle professionals and employees on a current basis, but is subject to repayment by the subsidiary of the PartnershipCompany that acts as general partner of the fund in the event that certain specified return thresholds are not ultimately achieved. The senior Carlyle professionals and certain other
217

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
investment professionals have personally guaranteed, subject to certain limitations, the obligation of these subsidiaries in respect of this general partner obligation. Such guarantees are several and not joint and are limited to a particular individual’s distributions received.
The PartnershipCompany does business with some of its portfolio companies; all such arrangements are on a negotiated basis.
Substantially all revenue is earned from affiliates of Carlyle.


11.12. Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted. The Act includes numerous changes in existing tax law, including a permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The rate reduction takes effect on January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate, the Partnership revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 using the newly enacted rate. The revaluation resulted in the recognition of additionalbefore provision for income taxes of approximately $113.0 million. In addition, the Partnership's tax receivable agreement liability was reduced by approximately $71.5 million due to the reduction in expected future benefits owed to the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings resulting from the decrease in the federal corporate income tax rate. The reduction in the tax receivable agreement liability resulting from the Act is included in other non-operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The SEC Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) in December 2017, which allows for reporting provisional amounts during a measurement period until the evaluation is complete. The Partnership assessed the potential impactconsists of the Act on its consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2017 and believes the material provisions have been properly considered. The Partnership will continue to evaluate the provisions of the Act and the impact of any future authoritative guidance.following:

Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
U.S. domestic income$1,402.9 $3,816.2 $439.5 
Foreign income169.6 211.3 140.5 
Total income before provision for income taxes$1,572.5 $4,027.5 $580.0 
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Current
Federal income tax$263.6 $351.3 $0.3 
State and local income tax30.4 59.6 3.6 
Foreign income tax55.6 56.5 50.2 
Total current349.6 467.4 54.1 
Deferred
Federal income tax(25.1)450.7 127.2 
State and local income tax(3.3)48.9 15.8 
Foreign income tax(33.4)15.3 0.1 
Total deferred(61.8)514.9 143.1 
Total provision for income taxes$287.8 $982.3 $197.2 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Current     
Federal income tax$(6.2) $0.4
 $0.7
State and local income tax(0.2) (0.4) 4.9
Foreign income tax38.8
 34.9
 27.4
Subtotal32.4
 34.9
 33.0
Deferred     
Federal income tax106.2
 (9.8) (36.7)
State and local income tax(2.7) (1.3) (2.6)
Foreign income tax(11.0) 6.2
 8.4
Subtotal92.5
 (4.9) (30.9)
Total provision for income taxes$124.9
 $30.0
 $2.1
The following table summarizes the effective income tax rate:

Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Income before provision for income taxes$1,572.5 $4,027.5 $580.0 
Provision for income taxes$287.8 $982.3 $197.2 
Effective income tax rate18.30 %24.39 %34.00 %
The effective tax rate is impacted by a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in the sources of income or loss during the period and whether such income or loss is taxable to the Company and its subsidiaries. The following table reconciles the effective income tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate:
225
218


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate21.00 %21.00 %21.00 %
State and local income taxes0.83 %2.35 %2.08 %
Foreign income taxes(1)
(1.75)%0.64 %4.76 %
Income passed through to common unitholders and non-controlling interest holders(2)
(0.67)%(0.07)%(2.02)%
Equity-based compensation(0.67)%(0.60)%(3.09)%
Valuation allowance0.30 %0.79 %(2.25)%
Impact of change in tax status due to Conversion(3)
 %— %14.59 %
Unrecognized tax benefits0.01 %0.02 %1.64 %
Other adjustments(4)
(0.75)%0.26 %(2.71)%
Effective income tax rate18.30 %24.39 %34.00 %
(1)2022 includes a tax benefit due to restructuring the ownership of its foreign Global Investment Solutions business and the impact of amending the Company's 2020 tax return to claim a foreign tax credit rather than the original filing position claiming a foreign tax deduction. In addition, 2022 and 2021 include the impact of claiming foreign tax credits while 2020 includes the deduction of foreign taxes.
(2)Includes income that is not taxable to the Company and its subsidiaries.
(3)Refer to Note 11 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for more information on the tax impacts of the Company's Corporate Conversion completed January 1, 2020.
(4)2020 includes a benefit of (2.64)% related to the disposal of certain foreign subsidiaries, which resulted in the recognition of long-term capital losses.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences that may exist between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
A summary of
219

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes the tax effects of the temporary differences is as follows:differences:
As of December 31, As of December 31,
2017
2016 20222021
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
Deferred tax assets
 
Deferred tax assets
Federal foreign tax credit$11.9
 $12.8
Federal net operating loss carry forward22.8
 12.1
State net operating loss carry forwards11.8
 4.3
Federal foreign tax credit carryforwardFederal foreign tax credit carryforward$37.3 $22.0 
State net operating loss carryforwardsState net operating loss carryforwards5.9 5.9 
Tax basis goodwill and intangibles98.2
 149.8
Tax basis goodwill and intangibles259.8 290.9 
Depreciation and amortization16.6
 25.3
Depreciation and amortization25.4 18.9 
Deferred restricted common unit compensation9.4
 12.1
Deferred restricted stock unit compensationDeferred restricted stock unit compensation24.7 31.4 
Lease liabilitiesLease liabilities119.0 113.4 
Accrued compensation31.0
 25.0
Accrued compensation781.3 883.6 
Basis difference in investments24.4
 34.0
Basis difference in investments 22.9 
Other24.3
 25.5
Other140.4 118.2 
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance250.4
 300.9
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance1,393.8 1,507.2 
Valuation allowance(27.3) (21.8)Valuation allowance(56.7)(46.8)
Total deferred tax assets$223.1
 $279.1
Total deferred tax assets$1,337.1 $1,460.4 
Deferred tax liabilities (1)

 
Deferred tax liabilities(1)
Intangible assets$4.8
 $5.5
Unrealized appreciation on investments121.0
 111.0
Unrealized appreciation on investments$1,558.0 $1,804.9 
Lease right-of-use assetsLease right-of-use assets89.2 85.0 
Basis difference in investmentsBasis difference in investments47.9 — 
Other2.5
 4.8
Other28.9 43.1 
Total deferred tax liabilities$128.3
 $121.3
Total deferred tax liabilities$1,724.0 $1,933.0 
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$94.8
 $157.8
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$(386.9)$(472.6)
 
(1)As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $52.7 million and $44.7 million, respectively, of deferred tax liabilities were offset and presented as a single deferred tax asset amount on the Partnership’s balance sheet as these deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same jurisdiction.
(1)As of December 31, 2017, the Partnership has a federal net operating loss carry forward of approximately $108.62022 and 2021, $1,321.3 million and cumulative net operating loss carry forwards$1,445.9 million, respectively, of approximately $197.1 million for separate statedeferred tax jurisdictions, which will be availableassets were offset and presented as a single deferred tax liability amount on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as these deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to offset future taxable income. If not used, a portion of the federal and state carry forwards will expire in 2035 and years forward and 2020 and years forward, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the Partnership had a federal foreign tax credit (“FTC”) carryforward of $11.9 million. The FTCs are related to taxes paid in various foreign jurisdictions and if not utilized a portion will expire in 2023 and years forward.
same jurisdiction.
The PartnershipCompany had $170.4$15.8 million and $234.4$14.5 million in deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively. These2021, respectively, which are offset with deferred tax liabilities where those assets and liabilities relate to the same tax jurisdiction. In both years, the deferred tax assets resulted primarily from future amortizationthe carryforward of federal and state tax basis intangible assets generated from exchanges coveredattributes, offset by the Tax Receivable Agreement (see Note 2) and acquisitions by the Partnershipa valuation allowance, and temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of depreciation on fixed assets and accrued compensation on lower-tier partnerships.liabilities at the Company’s foreign sub-advisor entities. The realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent on the Partnership’sCompany’s future taxable income before deductions related to the establishment of its deferred tax assets. The deferred tax asset balance is comprised of a portion that would be realized in connection with future ordinary income and a portion that would be realized in connection with future capital gains.

The PartnershipCompany evaluated various sources of evidence in determining the ultimate realizability of its deferred tax assets including the character and timing of projected future taxable income. During 2017income and 2016,the Company’s ability to claim a Partnership entity subjectforeign tax credit (“FTC”). The Company continues to entity level income tax inmaintain a valuation allowance on certain states incurred a significant tax loss. Management evaluated specific factors associated with the realizability of itsstate net operating losses andfor a corporate subsidiary with entity level state net operating losses that cannot be utilized by other group members. In addition, the entity’s deferred tax assets and determined that it is more likely than not that

226


The Carlyle Group L.P.

NotesCompany continues to the Consolidated Financial Statements


the Partnership will not realize these tax assets. Additionally, the Partnership determined thatmaintain a portion ofvaluation allowance on the US federal FTC carryforward earnedgenerated in 20132014 and forward willand other unused FTCs in 2022 that are not ultimatelyexpected to be realized due to federal limitations on FTCits utilization. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Partnership hasCompany established a valuation allowance of $27.3$56.7 million and $21.8$46.8 million, respectively, for these items.with the net increase primarily due to the FTC carryforward and related deferred tax assets offset by a release of the valuation allowance on tax attribute carryforwards that were utilized or written off in 2022 as well as certain foreign net operating losses that are not expected to be realized. For all other deferred tax assets, the PartnershipCompany has concluded it is more likely than not that they will be realized and that a valuation allowance is not needed at December 31, 2017.2022.
The Partnership hadCompany has deferred tax liabilities of $75.6$402.7 million and $76.6$487.1 million atas of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, which primarilyare offset with deferred tax assets where those assets and liabilities relate to unrealized appreciation on the Partnership’s investments insame tax jurisdiction. These
220

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the U.S. and in the Netherlands. Deferred tax liabilities related to unrealized appreciation were also recorded for outside tax basis differences as a result of the Partnership’s investment in Carlyle Holdings (see Note 1). The Consolidated Financial Statements
deferred tax liabilities primarily resulted from temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of accrued performance allocations. These deferred tax liabilities are net of related tocompensation and offset by step-up in tax basis resulting from Conversion and future amortization of tax basis intangible assets were recorded as partgenerated from exchanges covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement (see Note 3).
As of December 31, 2022, the Company has cumulative state pre-tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $69.6 million ($5.8 million tax-effected), which will be available to offset future taxable income. If unused, a portion of the Partnership’s business acquisitions.state carryforwards will begin to expire in 2023. The Company recorded a valuation allowance on $2.1 million of the state tax-effected net operating loss carryforwards which it believes will not be realized. In addition, the Company has a FTC carryforward of $37.3 million, which relates to taxes paid in foreign jurisdictions. If unused, a portion will expire in 2024 and years forward. Therefore, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance of $37.3 million on the FTC carryforward.
The Partnership’sCompany files its tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal and certain state, local and foreign tax regulators. With a few exceptions, as of December 31, 2022, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax expense was $124.9 million, $30.0 million and $2.1 millionreturns for the years ended December 31,2019 through 2021 are open under the normal three years statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination. State and local tax returns are generally subject to audit from 2017 2016to 2021. Foreign tax returns are generally subject to audit from 2011 to 2021. Certain of the Company’s affiliates are currently under audit by federal, state and 2015, respectively.foreign tax authorities. The following table reconcilesCompany does not believe that the provision for income taxesoutcome of the audits will require it to record unrecognized tax benefits or that the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate:outcome will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate35.00 % 35.00 % 35.00 %
Income passed through to common unitholders and non-controlling interest holders(1)
(31.55)% (40.00)% (40.64)%
Reduction in U.S. corporate tax rate7.77 %  %  %
Unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units and other compensation1.45 % 36.74 % 1.87 %
Foreign income taxes0.12 % 28.75 % 1.61 %
State and local income taxes(0.19)% (6.70)% 4.13 %
Valuation allowance impacting provision for income taxes0.07 % 16.84 % (3.88)%
Other adjustments(1.64)% (4.40)% 2.43 %
Effective income tax rate(2)
11.03 % 66.23 % 0.52 %
(1)The Partnership is organized as a series of pass through entities pursuant to the United States Internal Revenue Code. As such, the Partnership is not responsible for the tax liability due on certain income earned during the year. Such income is taxed at the unitholder and non-controlling interest holder level, and any income tax is the responsibility of the unitholders and is paid at that level.

(2)The effective income tax rate is calculated on income before provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate is impacted by a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in the sources of income or loss during the period and whether such income or loss is attributable to the Partnership's taxable subsidiaries.
Under U.S. GAAP for income taxes, the amount of tax benefit to be recognized is the amount of benefit that is “more likely than not” to be sustained upon examination. The PartnershipCompany has recorded a liability for uncertainunrecognized tax positionsbenefits of $12.3$39.3 million and $19.0$30.4 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, which is reflected in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These balances include $3.4$13.1 million and $6.0$9.8 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, related to interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. If recognized, $12.3$27.1 million of uncertain tax positions would be recorded as a reduction in the provision for income taxes.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of penalties and interest, is as follows:
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Balance at January 1$13.0
 $13.1
 $13.8
Additions for tax positions of prior years1.6
 1.3
 (0.7)
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations(5.7) (1.4) 
Balance at December 31$8.9
 $13.0
 $13.1

227


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


In the normal course of business, the Partnership is subject to examination by federal and certain state, local and foreign tax regulators. With a few exceptions, as of December 31, 2017, the Partnership’s U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2014 through 2016 are open under the normal three years statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination. State and local tax returns are generally subject to audit from 2013 to 2016. Foreign tax returns are generally subject to audit from 2010 to 2016. Certain of the Partnership’s affiliates are currently under audit by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. Currently. the Internal Revenue Service is examining the tax returns of certain subsidiaries for the 2013, 2014, and 2015 years.
 As of December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Balance at January 1$20.6 $17.2 $10.1 
Additions based on tax positions related to current year2.4 1.3 8.7 
Additions for tax positions of prior years5.3 2.6 — 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(1.6)(0.5)(0.1)
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations(0.5)— (0.6)
Reductions due to settlements — (0.9)
Balance at December 31$26.2 $20.6 $17.2 
The Partnership does not believe that the outcome of these audits will require it to record reserves for uncertain tax positions or that the outcome will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. The PartnershipCompany does not believe that it has any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.


On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) was signed into law. The IRA enacted a 15% alternative minimum tax on the “adjusted financial statement income” of certain large corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain actual and deemed stock repurchases, both of which become effective in 2023. While the IRA has no effect on the 2022 financial statements, the Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the IRA on its financial statements as further information becomes available.
12.

221

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
13. Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities

The components of the Partnership’sCompany’s non-controlling interests in consolidated entities are as follows:
As of December 31, As of December 31,
2017 2016 20222021
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
Non-Carlyle interests in Consolidated Funds$13.3
 $13.5
Non-Carlyle interests in Consolidated Funds$412.0 $180.1 
Non-Carlyle interests in majority-owned subsidiaries386.5
 331.7
Non-Carlyle interests in majority-owned subsidiaries186.9 234.4 
Non-controlling interest in carried interest, giveback obligations and cash held for carried interest distributions4.9
 (67.4)Non-controlling interest in carried interest, giveback obligations and cash held for carried interest distributions1.4 12.7 
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities$404.7
 $277.8
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities$600.3 $427.2 
 
The components of the Partnership’sCompany’s non-controlling interests in income of consolidated entities are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Non-Carlyle interests in Consolidated Funds$36.1 $2.7 $8.1 
Non-Carlyle interests in majority-owned subsidiaries20.7 55.1 16.5 
Non-controlling interest in carried interest, giveback obligations and cash held for carried interest distributions2.9 12.7 10.0 
Non-controlling interests in income of consolidated entities$59.7 $70.5 $34.6 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Non-Carlyle interests in Consolidated Funds$12.0
 $17.1
 $876.6
Non-Carlyle interests in majority-owned subsidiaries41.3
 (8.6) (20.6)
Non-controlling interest in carried interest, giveback obligations and cash held for carried interest distributions19.2
 32.3
 (78.3)
Net income attributable to other non-controlling interests in consolidated entities72.5
 40.8
 777.7
Net loss attributable to partners’ capital appropriated for CLOs
 
 (54.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in consolidated entities
 0.2
 (185.4)
Non-controlling interests in income of consolidated entities$72.5
 $41.0
 $537.9



228


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


13.14. Earnings Per Common UnitShare
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common unitshare are calculated as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders$238,100,000
 $238,100,000
 $6,400,000
 $6,400,000
 $(18,400,000) $(18,400,000)
Dilution of earnings due to participating securities with distribution rights
 
 
 
 167,000
 (1,743,000)
Incremental net income (loss) from assumed exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership units
 
 
 (32,100,000) 
 (69,300,000)
Net income (loss) attributable to common units$238,100,000
 $238,100,000
 $6,400,000
 $(25,700,000) $(18,233,000) $(89,443,000)
Weighted-average common units outstanding92,136,959
 100,082,548
 82,714,178
 308,522,990
 74,523,935
 298,739,382
Net income (loss) per common unit$2.58
 $2.38
 $0.08
 $(0.08) $(0.24) $(0.30)
 Year Ended December 31, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2020
 BasicDilutedBasicDilutedBasicDiluted
Net income attributable to common shares$1,225,000,000 $1,225,000,000 $2,974,700,000 $2,974,700,000 $348,200,000 $348,200,000 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding361,278,064 365,707,722 355,241,653 362,574,564 350,464,315 358,393,802 
Net income per common share$3.39 $3.35 $8.37 $8.20 $0.99 $0.97 
The weighted-average common unitsshares outstanding, basic and diluted, are calculated as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted
The Carlyle Group L.P. weighted-average common units outstanding92,136,959
 92,136,959
 82,714,178
 82,714,178
 74,523,935
 74,523,935
Unvested deferred restricted common units
 7,347,645
 
 3,331,282
 
 
Contingently issuable Carlyle Holdings partnership units and common units
 597,944
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average vested Carlyle Holdings partnership units
 
 
 222,183,911
 
 216,943,053
Unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units
 
 
 293,619
 
 7,272,394
Weighted-average common units outstanding92,136,959
 100,082,548
 82,714,178
 308,522,990
 74,523,935
 298,739,382
 Year Ended December 31, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2020
 BasicDilutedBasicDilutedBasicDiluted
The Carlyle Group Inc. weighted-average common shares outstanding361,278,064 361,278,064 355,241,653 355,241,653 350,464,315 350,464,315 
Unvested restricted stock units 2,394,372 — 4,713,277 — 5,545,150 
Issuable common shares and performance-vesting restricted stock units 2,035,286 — 2,619,634 — 2,384,337 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding361,278,064 365,707,722 355,241,653 362,574,564 350,464,315 358,393,802 
The Carlyle Group L.P. weighted-average common units outstanding includes vested deferred restricted common units and common units associated with acquisitions that have been earned for which issuance of the related common units is deferred until future periods.
The PartnershipCompany applies the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive weighted-average common unitsshares represented by the unvested deferred restricted commonstock units. Also included in the determination of dilutive weighted-average common unitsshares are issuable and contingently issuable Carlyle Holdings partnership units and common unitsshares associated with the Partnership'sCompany’s acquisitions, strategic investment in NGP, performance-vesting restricted stock units and strategic investmentsissuable common shares associated with a program under which the Company may distribute realized performance allocation related compensation in NGP. For purposes of determining the dilutive weighted-average common units, it is assumed that December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 represent the end of the contingency period.
The Partnership applies the “if-converted” methodfully vested, newly issued shares (see Note 15 to the vested Carlyle Holdings partnership units to determine the dilutive weighted-average common units outstanding. The Partnership applies the treasury stock method to the unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units and the “if-converted” method on the resulting number of additional Carlyle Holdings partnership units to determine the dilutive weighted-average common units represented by the unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units.consolidated financial statements).
In computing the dilutive effect that the exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership units would have on earnings per common unit, the Partnership considered that net income available to holders of common units would decrease due to the elimination of non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings (including any tax impact). Based on these calculations, 227,275,453 of vested Carlyle Holdings partnership units and 2,579,831 of unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units for the year ended December 31, 2017 were antidilutive, and therefore have been excluded.


229
222


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


15. Equity
ForShares Issued for Performance Allocation Related Compensation
In October 2021, the Company commenced a program under which, at the Company’s discretion, up to 20% of realized performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation over a certain threshold amount may be distributed in fully vested, newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 222,183,911 of vested Carlyle Holdings partnership units2022 and 293,619 of unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units for the year endedperiod from October 1, 2021 through December 31, 2016 were dilutive. As a result,2021, the net lossCompany distributed 850,110 and 86,317, fully vested, newly issued common shares, respectively, related to previously accrued performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation of non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings associated with this assumed exchange$38.9 million and $4.8 million, respectively. The Company has determined to pause the issuance of $(32.1) million for the year ended December 31, 2016 has been included in net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. for purposes of the dilutive earnings per common unit calculation.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, 216,943,053 of vested Carlyle Holdings partnership units and 7,272,394 of unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units were dilutive. As a result, the net loss of non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings associated with this assumed exchange of $69.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 has been included in net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. for purposes of the dilutive earnings per common unit calculation. However, for the year ended December 31, 2015, 3,978,436 of unvested deferred restricted common units were antidilutive, and therefore have been excluded.
On August 1, 2013, as part of acquiring the remaining 40% equity interests in AlpInvest, the Partnership issued 914,087 common units that are subject to vesting conditions. As of December 31, 2017, 7,782 common units remain unvested. The common units participate immediately in any Partnership distributions. Under ASC 260, these common units are considered participating securities and are required to be included in the computation of earnings per common unitshares pursuant to the two-class method.

14.Equity and Equity-Based Compensation

Preferred Unit Issuancethis program.
    Stock Repurchase Program
On September 13, 2017, the Partnership issued 16,000,000 of 5.875% Series A Preferred Units (the “Preferred Units”) for gross proceeds of $400.0 million, or $387.5 million, net of issuance costs and expenses. The Partnership plans to use the net proceeds from the sale of the Preferred Units for general corporate purposes, including to fund investments.

Distributions on the Preferred Units will be payable quarterly on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2017, when, as and if declared byIn October 2021, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership, at a rate per annum of 5.875%. Distributions on the Preferred Units are discretionary and non-cumulative.

Subject to certain exceptions, unless distributions have been declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment on the Preferred Units for a quarterly distribution period, during the remainder of that distribution period, the Partnership may not repurchase any common units or any other units that are junior in rank to the Preferred Units and the Partnership may not declare or pay or set apart payment for distributions on any common or junior units for the remainder of that distribution period, other than (i) distributions of tax distribution amounts received from Carlyle Holdings in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships as in effect on the date the Preferred Units were first issued, (ii) the net unit settlement of equity-based awards granted under The Carlyle Group L.P. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) (or any successor or any similar plan) in order to satisfy associated tax obligations, or (iii) distributions paid in junior units or options, warrants or rights to subscribe for or purchase other units or with proceeds from the substantially concurrent sale of junior units. These restrictions are not applicable during the period from original issue date to, but excluding, December 15, 2017.

The Preferred Units may be redeemed at the Partnership’s option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after September 15, 2022 at a price of $25.00 per Preferred Unit, plus declared and unpaid distributions to, but excluding, the redemption date, without payment of any undeclared distributions. Holders of the Preferred Units have no right to require the redemption of the Preferred Units and there is no maturity date.

If a change of control event or tax redemption event occurs prior to September 15, 2022, the Partnership may, at its option, redeem the Preferred Units, in whole but not in part, upon at least 30 days’ notice, within 60 days of the occurrence of such change in control event or such tax redemption event, as applicable, at a price of $25.25 per Preferred Unit, plus declared and unpaid distributions to, but excluding, the redemption date, without payment of any undeclared distributions. If (i) a change of control event occurs (whether before, on or after September 15, 2022) and (ii) the Partnership does not give notice prior to the 31st day following the change in control event to redeem all the outstanding Preferred Units, the distribution rate per annum on the Preferred Units will increase by 5.00%, beginning on the 31st day following such change in control event.


230


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


If a rating agency event occurs prior to September 15, 2022, the Partnership may, at its option, redeem the Preferred Units, in whole but not in part, upon at least 30 days’ notice, within 60 days of the occurrence of such rating agency event, as applicable, at a price of $25.50 per Preferred Unit, plus declared and unpaid distributions to, but excluding, the redemption date, without payment of any undeclared distributions.

The Preferred Units are not convertible into common units or any other class or series of interests or any other security. Holders of the Preferred Units will generally have no voting rights and have none of the voting rights given to holders of the Partnership’s common units, except as otherwise provided in the Partnership's limited partnership agreement.
Unit Repurchase Program

In February 2016, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the PartnershipCompany authorized the repurchase of up to $200$400 million of common units and/or Carlyle Holdings units.stock, which replaced an authorization provided in February 2021 effective January 1, 2022. Under this unit repurchase program, unitsshares of common stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The Partnership expects that the majority of repurchases under this program will be done via open market transactions. No units will be repurchased from the Partnership's executive officers under this program.otherwise, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans. The timing and actual number of shares of common units and/or Carlyle Holdings unitsstock repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements, price, and economic and market conditions. This unit repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, the PartnershipCompany paid an aggregate of $0.2$185.6 million to repurchase and retire 14,190 units5.0 million shares with all of the repurchases done via open market and brokered transactions. Since inceptionAs of thisDecember 31, 2022, $214.3 million of repurchase capacity remained under the program. In February 2023, the Board of Directors replenished the repurchase program and expanded the Partnership haslimit to $500 million of common stock in aggregate, effective March 31, 2023.
Shares Issued in Connection with Acquisitions
In August 2022, the Company issued 0.6 million shares of common stock, which represented $25.0 million of the purchase price paid an aggregate of $59.1 million to repurchase and retire 3.7 million units.

Quarterly Unit Exchange Program

Beginning in the second quarteracquisition of 2017, currentAbingworth. In March 2022, the Company issued 4.2 million shares of common stock, which represented $194.5 million of the purchase price paid in the acquisition of management contracts related to a portfolio of assets from CBAM. See Note 4 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a further description of these acquisitions.
Dividends
The table below presents information regarding the quarterly dividends on the common shares, which were made at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Dividend Record DateDividend Payment DateDividend per Common ShareDividend to Common Stockholders
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
May 11, 2021May 19, 2021$0.25 $88.7 
August 10, 2021August 17, 20210.25 89.3 
November 9, 2021November 17, 20210.25 89.1 
February 15, 2022February 23, 20220.25 89.5 
Total 2021 Dividend Year$1.00 $356.6 
May 10, 2022May 17, 2022$0.325 $117.6 
August 9, 2022August 16, 20220.325 118.3 
November 18, 2022November 25, 20220.325 118.2 
February 22, 2023March 1, 20230.325 118.4 
Total 2022 Dividend Year$1.30 $472.5 

The Board of Directors will take into account general economic and former seniorbusiness conditions, as well as the Company’s strategic plans and prospects, business and investment opportunities, financial condition and obligations, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, other constraints on the payment of dividends by the Company to its common stockholders or by
223

The Carlyle professionals are ableGroup Inc.

Notes to exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units on a quarterly basis, subjectthe Consolidated Financial Statements
subsidiaries to the Company, and other such factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, the terms of the Exchange Agreement. DuringCompany’s credit facility provide certain limits on the year ended December 31, 2017, current and former senior Carlyle professionals exchanged 6,430,383 Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units, resulting in a reallocation of capital of $33.9 million from non-controlling interests in Carlyle HoldingsCompany’s ability to partners' capital and accumulated other comprehensive loss. None of Carlyle's named executive officers participated in the quarterly unit exchange.pay dividends.


16. Equity-Based Compensation
In May 2012, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., the general partner of the Partnership, adopted Thethe Equity Incentive Plan. The Equity Incentive Plan, which was amended on January 1, 2020 in connection with the Conversion to reflect shares of the Company’s common stock, is a source of equity-based awards permitting the PartnershipCompany to grant to Carlyle employees, directors of the Partnership’s general partner and consultants non-qualified options, unitshare appreciation rights, common units,shares, restricted common units, deferred restricted common units, phantom restricted commonstock units and other awards based on the Partnership’sCompany’s common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units.shares. The total number of the Partnership’sCompany’s common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership unitsshares which were initially available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan was 30,450,000. ThePrior to June 1, 2021, the Equity Incentive Plan containscontained a provision which automatically increasesincreased the number of the Partnership’sCompany’s common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership unitsshares available for grant based on a pre-determined formula; this increase occursoccurred annually on January 1. As of January 1, 2018,2021, pursuant to the formula, the total number of the Partnership’sCompany’s common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership unitsshares available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan was 32,645,874.
Unvested Partnership Common Units
35,352,057. On AugustJune 1, 2013,2021, the Partnership acquired the remaining 40% equity interest in AlpInvest. As partshareholders of the transaction,Company approved an amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan that removed the Partnership issued 914,087provision providing for the automatic increase and reset the total number of shares of common unitsstock available for grant to AlpInvest sellers who are employees16,000,000 for awards granted under the plan after June 1, 2021. An increase in the number of shares available for grant under the plan would require shareholder approval. As of December 31, 2022, the total number of the Partnership that are subjectCompany’s common shares available for grant under the amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan was 12,861,371. This amount does not reflect 9.9 million restricted stock units granted under the amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan in February 2023.
Common Shares
In connection with its strategic investment in NGP, the Company agreed to vesting conditions. Thesegrant common units were unvested atshares on each of February 1, 2019 and 2020 with a value of $10.0 million per year to an affiliate of NGP Management, and subsequent to 2020, to grant andcommon shares on an annual basis with a value not to exceed based $10.0 million based on a prescribed formula, which will vest over a period42-month period. Because the Company accounts for its investment in NGP under the equity method of up to five years. The unvested common units are accounted for as equity-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The grant-dateaccounting, the fair value of the unvested common unitsshares is chargedrecognized as a reduction to equity-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the required service period. Forprincipal investment income. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the Partnership recorded $0.2Company recognized $8.4 million, $1.6$9.2 million and $9.0$8.8 million, in equity-based compensation expense associated with these awards, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, the total unrecognized equity-based compensation expense related to unvested common units was not material and is expected to be recognized within the next year.

231


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Unvested Carlyle Holdings Partnership Units
Unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units are held by senior Carlyle professionals and other individuals engaged in Carlyle’s business and generally vest ratably over a six-year period. The unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units are accounted for as equity-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718. The grant-date fair value of the unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units are charged to equity-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the required service period. The Partnership recorded equity-based compensation expense associated with these awards of $166.4 million, $183.7 million and $191.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. No tax benefits have been recorded related to the unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units, as the vesting of these units does not result in a tax deduction to the corporate taxpayers.
In connection with the Partnership’s investment in NGP Management in December 2012, the Partnership issued 996,572 Carlyle Holdings partnership units to ECM Capital, L.P. which vest ratably over a period of five years. The Partnership also issued 597,944 Carlyle Holdings partnership units to ECM Capital, L.P. that were issued at closing but vest upon the achievement of performance conditions. As disclosed in Note 5, the performance condition was removed as part of the March 2017 agreement with NGP. The fair value of these units will be recognizedrespectively, as a reduction to the Partnership’sprincipal investment income in NGP Management over the relevant service or performance period, based on the fair value of the units on each reporting date and adjusted for the actual fair value of the units at each vesting date. For the periods prior to 2017 for Carlyle Holdings partnership units that vest based on the achievement of performance conditions, the Partnership uses the minimum number of partnership units within the range of potential values for measurement and recognition purposes.
As of December 31, 2017, the total unrecognized equity-based compensation expense related to unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units is $55.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average term of 0.3 yearsthese shares.
Deferred Restricted CommonStock Units
The deferred restricted commonstock units are unvested when granted and vest ratably over a service period, which generally ranges upfrom six months to sixfour years. The grant-date fair value of the deferred restricted commonstock units granted to Carlyle’s employees is charged to equity-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the required service period. Additionally, the calculation of the expense assumes a per unit discount that generally ranges upfrom 0% to 40.0%20.0%, as these unvested awards do not participate in any Partnership distributions.dividends. Equity-based compensation expense generates deferred tax assets, which are realized when the units vest. The PartnershipCompany recorded compensation expense of $153.7$154.0 million, $149.2$163.1 million and $176.2$105.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, with $13.6$28.7 million, $17.2$33.4 million and $16.4$26.0 million of corresponding deferred tax benefits, respectively. A portion of the accumulated deferred tax asset associated with equity-based compensation expense was reclassified as a current tax benefit due to units vesting during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015. Equity-based compensation expense generates deferred tax assets, which are realized when the units vest.2020. The net impact of additionalthe addition/(reduction) in deferred tax assets due to the equity-based compensation expense recorded during the period less the reduction to the deferred tax assetsdeduction for units that vested was not significant for the year ended December 31 2017, and was $4.8$(3.2) million, $10.0 million and $2.9$(4.8) million for the years ended December 31, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. In addition, the deferred tax asset related to equity-based compensation increased by $15.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of the exchange of Carlyle Holdings units in the Conversion, as equity-based compensation previously attributable to non-controlling interests is now attributable to the Company (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for information regarding the impact of the Conversion). As of December 31, 2017,2022, the total unrecognized equity-based compensation expense related to unvested deferred restricted commonstock units is $154.7$238.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average term of 1.92.0 years.
Equity-based awards issued to non-employees, including non-employee directors and consultants, are recognized as general, administrative and other expenses. The expense associated with the deferred restricted common units granted to NGP personnel by the Partnership are recognized as a reduction of the Partnership’s investment income in NGP Management. The grant-date fair value of deferred restricted commonstock units granted to Carlyle’s non-employee directorsnon-employees is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The cost of services received in exchange for an equity-based award issued to consultants is measured at each vesting date. Equity-based awards that require the satisfaction of future service criteria are recognized over the relevant service period, adjusted for estimated forfeitures of awards not expected to vest, based on the fair value of the award on each reporting date and adjusted for the actual fair value of the award at each vesting date.period. The expense for equity-based awards issued to non-employees was not significant$5.0 million, $5.2 million and $6.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020, respectively.
224

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The vesting of deferred restricted commonstock units creates taxable income for the Partnership'sCompany’s employees in certain jurisdictions. Accordingly, the employees may elect to engage the Partnership'sCompany’s equity plan service provider to sell sufficient common unitsshares and generate proceeds to cover their minimum tax obligations.

232


The Carlyle Group L.P.

NotesDuring 2021, the Company granted 7.1 million long-term, strategic restricted stock units to certain senior professionals, the Consolidated Financial Statements


In February 2018,majority of which are eligible to vest based on the Partnership granted approximately 13.7 million deferred restricted common unitsachievement of annual performance targets over four years across a significant number of the Partnership'sCompany’s employees. The total estimated grant-date fair value of these awards was approximately $283 million. The awards vest generallyCompensation cost will be recognized over athe requisite service period of 12 to 60 months.if it is probable that the performance condition will be satisfied.
A summary of the status of the Partnership’sCompany’s non-vested equity-based awards as of December 31, 20172022 and a summary of changes from December 31, 20142019 through December 31, 2017,2022, are presented below:
 The Carlyle Group, Inc.
 Equity Settled Awards
Unvested SharesRestricted
Stock
Units
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Unvested
Common
Shares
(1)
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Balance, December 31, 201914,622,159 $17.09 788,290 $20.30 
Granted3,450,355 $29.40 299,401 $33.40 
Vested7,112,767 $17.36 339,347 $20.63 
Forfeited2,436,665 $19.03 — $— 
Balance, December 31, 20208,523,082 $21.70 748,344 $25.39 
Granted (2)
11,207,062 $31.64 291,396 $32.93 
Vested4,625,457 $22.64 404,310 $24.73 
Forfeited329,036 $31.02 — $— 
Balance, December 31, 202114,775,651 $30.70 635,430 $29.27 
Granted4,216,827 $40.35 188,223 $49.06 
Vested5,805,437 $28.15 370,773 $26.54 
Forfeited2,321,793 $30.84 — $— 
Balance, December 31, 202210,865,248 $35.78 452,880 $39.73 
 Carlyle Holdings The Carlyle Group, L.P.
     Equity Settled Awards Cash Settled Awards
Unvested UnitsPartnership
Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Deferred
Restricted
Common
Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Unvested
Common
Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Phantom
Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Balance, December 31, 201435,997,415
 $22.16
 18,929,270
 $26.12
 809,797
 $27.19
 104,070
 $23.40
Granted
 $
 6,770,420
 $22.39
 
 $
 
 $
Vested8,733,826
 $22.11
 5,452,961
 $26.91
 31,132
 $21.53
 93,109
 $22.52
Forfeited444,477
 $22.00
 1,826,295
 $24.98
 11,674
 $27.99
 4,220
 $24.80
Balance, December 31, 201526,819,112
 $22.18
 18,420,434
 $24.62
 766,991
 $27.41
 6,741
 $34.58
Granted
 $
 6,730,159
 $11.30
 
 $
 
 $
Vested8,830,325
 $22.11
 7,007,857
 $25.14
 728,080
 $27.71
 3,480
 $34.45
Forfeited748,787
 $22.00
 1,436,816
 $22.91
 
 $
 741
 $34.39
Balance, December 31, 201617,240,000
 $22.22
 16,705,920
 $19.21
 38,911
 $21.67
 2,520
 $34.81
Granted
 $
 8,260,455
 $14.17
 
 $
 
 $
Vested8,707,671
 $22.40
 8,864,747
 $19.63
 31,129
 $21.53
 2,520
 $34.81
Forfeited437,314
 $22.00
 582,037
 $19.62
 
 $
 
 $
Balance, December 31, 20178,095,015
 $22.03
 15,519,591
 $16.25
 7,782
 $22.22
 
 $

15.Deconsolidation of a Real Estate Development Company
The Partnership, indirectly through certain Carlyle real estate investment funds, had an(1) Includes shares issued in connection with the Company’s strategic investment in Urbplan Desenvolvimento Urbano S.A. (“Urbplan”),NGP.
(2) Includes 7.1 million long-term, strategic restricted stock units to certain senior professionals, the majority of which are eligible to vest based on the achievement of annual performance targets over four years across a Brazilian residential subdivision and land development company. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership disposed of its interests in Urbplan in a transaction with a third party. The third party acquired operational control and allnumber of the economic interests in Urbplan in the transaction. Since the Partnership is no longer the primary beneficiary of Urbplan, Urbplan was deconsolidated from the Partnership's financial results. The Partnership recorded a pre-tax loss upon deconsolidation of $65 million during the third quarter of 2017, which includes the impact of deconsolidation, the terms of the transaction with the third party and related reserves. The loss is recorded in interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation in the consolidated statements of operations. Excluding the effect of this transaction, Urbplan's income before provision for income taxes prior to the transaction was not material to the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.Company’s employees.
The Partnership concluded that Urbplan was a VIE as of September 30, 2013 because Urbplan's equity investment at risk was not sufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional financial support. The Partnership also concluded that it was the primary beneficiary of Urbplan. As such, the Partnership began consolidating Urbplan into its consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2013. Due to the timing and availability of financial information from Urbplan, the Partnership consolidated the financial position and results of operations of Urbplan on a financial reporting lag of 90 days. The assets and liabilities of Urbplan were held in legal entities separate from the Partnership; the Partnership did not guarantee or assume any obligation for repayment of Urbplan’s liabilities nor were the assets of Urbplan available to meet the liquidity requirements of the Partnership.
Urbplan is party to various litigation, government investigations and proceedings, including disputes with creditors and customers. The Partnership does not believe it is probable that the outcome of any Urbplan litigation, disputes or other potential claims will materially affect the Partnership or these consolidated financial statements.

233


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The assets and liabilities recognized in the Partnership’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 related to Urbplan were as follows:
 As of December 31,
 2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Receivables and inventory of a real estate VIE: 
Customer and other receivables$99.4
Inventory costs in excess of billings and advances46.0

$145.4
Other assets of a real estate VIE:
Restricted investments$12.7
Fixed assets, net0.2
Deferred tax assets9.1
Other assets9.5

$31.5
Loans payable of a real estate VIE, at fair value (principal amount of $144.4 million as of December 31, 2016)$79.4
Other liabilities of a real estate VIE:
Accounts payable$14.6
Other liabilities109.9

$124.5
The revenues and expenses recognized in the Partnership’s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, related to Urbplan were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenue of a real estate VIE:     
Land development services$104.6
 $69.3
 $80.0
Investment income4.4
 25.8
 6.8

$109.0
 $95.1
 $86.8


 
  
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation:
 
  
Costs of products sold and services rendered$64.4
 $31.3
 $48.5
Interest expense18.5
 51.4
 40.9
Change in fair value of loans payable(6.6) (17.6) 9.2
Compensation and benefits2.8
 8.5
 10.7
G&A and other expenses58.9
 134.0
 35.3
Loss on deconsolidation64.5
 



$202.5
 $207.6
 $144.6
The following is a summary of the significant classifications of revenues and expenses of Urbplan:
Revenue of a real estate VIE – This balance consisted primarily of amounts earned for land development services using the completed contract method and investment income earned on Urbplan’s investments. Under the completed contract method of accounting, revenue was not recorded until the period in which the land development services contract is completed.
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation – This balance consisted primarily of interest expense on Urbplan’s borrowings, general and administrative expenses, compensation and benefits, costs associated

234


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


with land development services, and the loss incurred upon the deconsolidation of Urbplan in the third quarter of 2017. Also included in this caption was the change in the Partnership’s estimate of the fair value of Urbplan’s loans payable during the period. Interest expense was recorded on Urbplan’s borrowings at variable rates as defined. Costs related to Urbplan’s land development services activities were capitalized until the services are complete. Costs associated with advertising, marketing and other selling activities were expensed when incurred.
16.17. Segment Reporting
Carlyle conducts its operations through fourthree reportable segments:
CorporateGlobal Private Equity – The CorporateGlobal Private Equity segment is comprised of the Partnership’sCompany’s operations that advise a diverse group of funds that invest in buyout, middle market and growth capital, transactions that focus on either a particular geography or a particular industry.
Real Assets – The Real Assets segment is comprised of the Partnership’s operations that advise U.S. and international funds focused on real estate, infrastructure energy and renewable energynatural resources transactions.
Global Credit – The Global Credit segment advises a group of fundsproducts that pursue investment opportunities across various types of credit, equitiesincluding loans and alternative instruments,structured credit, direct lending, opportunistic credit, aircraft finance, infrastructure debt, insurance solutions and (as regards certain macroeconomic strategies) currencies, and interest rate products and their derivatives. We have now completed the exit of our hedge fund investment advisory and commodities investment advisory businesses.global capital markets solutions.
Global Investment Solutions – The Global Investment Solutions segment advises global private equity fund of funds programs and related co-investment, secondary and secondaryportfolio finance investments activities through AlpInvest. This segment also includesincluded Metropolitan Real Estate (“MRE”), a global manager of real estate fund of funds and related co-investment and secondary activities, and, through the first quarter of 2016, Diversified Global Asset Management (“DGAM”). The Partnership wound down of the operations of DGAM throughout 2016.prior to its sale on April 1, 2021.


The Partnership’sCompany’s reportable business segments are differentiated by their various investment focuses and strategies. Overhead costs are generally allocated based on direct basecash-based compensation and benefits expense for each segment. The Partnership includes adjustments to reflect the Partnership’s economic interests in Claren Road (through January 2017) and ESG (through June 2016). Effective January 1, 2016, the Partnership's economic interest in Claren Road increased from 55% to 63% as a result of reallocation of interest from a departing founder. On January 31, 2017, the Partnership transferred all of its economic interests in Claren Road to its founders (see Note 9). The Partnership'sCompany’s earnings from its investment in NGP are presented in the respective operating captions within the Real AssetsGlobal Private Equity segment.

225

The net income or loss from Urbplan allocableCarlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Partnership (after consideration of amounts allocable to non-controlling interests)Consolidated Financial Statements
Distributable Earnings. Distributable Earnings, or “DE,” is presented within investment incomea key performance benchmark used in the Real Assets segment until the third quarter of 2017 when Urbplan was deconsolidated from the Partnership's financial results (see Note 15).

Economic Income (“EI”)Company’s industry and its components are key performance measures usedis evaluated regularly by management to make operatingin making resource deployment and compensation decisions and assess thein assessing performance of the Partnership’sCompany’s three reportable segments. EI was formerly defined as “Economic Net Income.” There has been no changeManagement also uses DE in budgeting, forecasting, and the overall management of the Company’s segments. Management believes that reporting DE is helpful to understanding the computationCompany’s business and that investors should review the same supplemental financial measure that management uses to analyze the Company’s segment performance. DE is intended to show the amount of this measure. EInet realized earnings without the effects of the consolidation of the Consolidated Funds. DE is derived from the Company’s segment reported results and is used to assess performance.
Distributable Earnings differs from income (loss) before provision for income taxes computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP in that it includes certain tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance fees,revenues (comprised of performance allocations and incentive fees), and does not include unrealized performance allocations and related compensation expense, unrealized principal investment income, equity-based compensation expense, net income (loss) attributable to non-Carlyle interests in consolidated entities, or charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items. Charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items include: charges (credits) associated with equity-based compensation that was issued in the initial public offering in May 2012 or is issued in acquisitions, dispositions or strategic investments, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, amortization and any impairment charges associated with acquired intangible assets, transaction costs associated with acquisitions and dispositions, charges associated with earnouts and contingent consideration including gains and losses associated with the estimated fair value of contingent considerationconsiderations issued in conjunction with acquisitions or strategic investments, impairment charges associated with lease right-of-use assets, gains and losses from the retirement of debt, charges associated with contract terminations and employee severance. Management believes the inclusion or exclusion of these items provides investors with a meaningful indication of the Company’s core operating performance.

Fee Related Earnings. Fee Related Earnings, (“FRE”) is a component of EI andor “FRE,” is used to assess the ability of the business to cover direct base compensation and operating expenses from total fee revenues. FRE differs from income (loss) before provision for income taxes computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP in that it adjusts for the items included in the calculation of EIDE and also adjusts EIDE to exclude net realized performance fees,revenues, realized principal investment income, from investments in Carlyle funds, equity-based compensation, net interest (interest income less interest expense), and certain general, administrative and other expenses when the timing of any future payment is uncertain. AsIn 2022, the Company began to disclose fee related performance revenues as a separate line item in its segment results. Fee related performance revenues are the realized portion of December 31, 2017,performance revenues that are measured and received on a recurring basis, are not dependent on the Partnership updateddisposition of investments, and which are not at risk of giveback. Previously, these amounts were included as a component of fund management fees. Beginning in 2022, the definition of FRECompany’s Core plus real estate fund, CPI, began to excluderealize recurring performance revenues. Realized net interest

performance revenues for CPI were immaterial in prior periods.
235
226


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


(interest income less interest expense) in our segment results. FRE for all prior periods presented has been recast to reflect the updated definition.

Distributable Earnings (“DE”) is FRE plus realized net performance fees, realized investment income, and net interest, and is used to assess performance and amounts potentially available for distribution. DE is used by management primarily in making resource deployment and compensation decisions across the Partnership’s four reportable segments. Management also uses Distributable Earnings in our budgeting, forecasting, and the overall management of our segments. Management makes operating decisions and assesses the performance of each of the Partnership’s business segments based on financial and operating metrics and data that is presented without the consolidation of any of the Consolidated Funds. Consequently, the key performance measures discussed above and all segment data exclude the assets, liabilities and operating results related to the Consolidated Funds.

236


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The following tables present the financial data for the Partnership’s fourCompany’s three reportable segments as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 December 31, 2017 and the Year Then Ended
 Corporate
Private
Equity
 Real Assets Global Credit Investment
Solutions
 Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues         
Fund level fee revenues         
Fund management fees$471.0
 $263.6
 $191.5
 $154.9
 $1,081.0
Portfolio advisory fees, net15.2
 0.8
 0.7
 
 16.7
Transaction fees, net22.4
 4.5
 
 
 26.9
Total fund level fee revenues508.6
 268.9
 192.2
 154.9
 1,124.6
Performance fees         
Realized831.5
 92.0
 75.4
 86.4
 1,085.3
Unrealized781.6
 268.3
 (16.3) 56.0
 1,089.6
Total performance fees1,613.1
 360.3
 59.1
 142.4
 2,174.9
Investment income (loss)         
Realized25.4
 (63.2) 11.9
 0.1
 (25.8)
Unrealized37.0
 26.7
 5.4
 3.9
 73.0
Total investment income (loss)62.4
 (36.5) 17.3
 4.0
 47.2
Interest income5.5
 3.0
 7.1
 1.1
 16.7
Other income6.0
 2.2
 6.8
 0.4
 15.4
Total revenues2,195.6
 597.9
 282.5
 302.8
 3,378.8
Segment Expenses         
Compensation and benefits         
Direct base compensation235.7
 77.6
 79.2
 72.0
 464.5
Indirect base compensation105.0
 50.5
 25.3
 12.7
 193.5
Equity-based compensation60.5
 34.9
 20.7
 7.8
 123.9
Performance fee related         
Realized372.9
 41.6
 35.0
 83.2
 532.7
Unrealized362.6
 75.3
 (7.3) 33.8
 464.4
Total compensation and benefits1,136.7
 279.9
 152.9
 209.5
 1,779.0
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses119.8
 78.5
 3.3
 32.3
 233.9
Depreciation and amortization expense15.3
 7.1
 5.1
 3.6
 31.1
Interest expense27.9
 17.0
 14.5
 6.1
 65.5
Total expenses1,299.7
 382.5
 175.8
 251.5
 2,109.5
Economic Income$895.9
 $215.4
 $106.7
 $51.3
 $1,269.3
(-) Net Performance Fees877.6
 243.4
 31.4
 25.4
 1,177.8
(-) Investment Income (Loss)62.4
 (36.5) 17.3
 4.0
 47.2
(+) Equity-based Compensation60.5
 34.9
 20.7
 7.8
 123.9
(+) Net Interest22.4
 14.0
 7.4
 5.0
 48.8
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies(12.5) (5.8) (4.1) (2.6) (25.0)
(=) Fee Related Earnings$26.3
 $51.6
 $82.0
 $32.1
 $192.0
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees458.6
 50.4
 40.4
 3.2
 552.6
(+) Realized Investment Income (Loss)25.4
 (63.2) 11.9
 0.1
 (25.8)
(+) Net Interest(22.4) (14.0) (7.4) (5.0) (48.8)
(=) Distributable Earnings$487.9
 $24.8
 $126.9
 $30.4
 $670.0
Segment assets as of December 31, 2017$3,644.6
 $1,946.3
 $881.0
 $1,071.2
 $7,543.1
2022:

 December 31, 2022 and the Year Then Ended
 Global
Private
Equity
Global
Credit
Global
Investment
Solutions
Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$1,300.9 $473.1 $222.9 $1,996.9 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other29.5 81.6 — 111.1 
Fee related performance revenues69.4 59.9 — 129.3 
Total fund level fee revenues1,399.8 614.6 222.9 2,237.3 
Realized performance revenues1,656.6 131.5 192.6 1,980.7 
Realized principal investment income108.7 38.1 3.8 150.6 
Interest income14.9 15.3 2.6 32.8 
Total revenues3,180.0 799.5 421.9 4,401.4 
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits598.3 284.2 111.7 994.2 
Realized performance revenues related compensation751.5 61.3 169.4 982.2 
Total compensation and benefits1,349.8 345.5 281.1 1,976.4 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses235.3 97.7 36.8 369.8 
Depreciation and amortization expense25.6 8.2 5.1 38.9 
Interest expense63.7 32.6 11.0 107.3 
Total expenses1,674.4 484.0 334.0 2,492.4 
Distributable Earnings$1,505.6 $315.5 $87.9 $1,909.0 
(-) Realized net performance revenues905.1 70.2 23.2 998.5 
(-) Realized principal investment income108.7 38.1 3.8 150.6 
(+) Net interest48.8 17.3 8.4 74.5 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$540.6 $224.5 $69.3 $834.4 
Segment assets as of December 31, 2022$9,790.8 $3,141.6 $1,860.4 $14,792.8 
237
227


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The following tables present the financial data for the Partnership’s fourCompany’s three reportable segments as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016:2021:
 
 December 31, 2016 and the Year Then Ended
 Corporate
Private
Equity
 Real Assets Global Credit
Investment
Solutions

Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
 
  


 
Fund level fee revenues
 
 




Fund management fees$498.9
 $251.1
 $195.5
 $140.3

$1,085.8
Portfolio advisory fees, net14.5
 0.2
 1.1

0.8

16.6
Transaction fees, net31.2
 
 



31.2
Total fund level fee revenues544.6
 251.3
 196.6
 141.1

1,133.6
Performance fees
     
 
Realized1,060.5
 53.1
 36.6
 65.6

1,215.8
Unrealized(777.5) 274.0
 1.2
 38.2

(464.1)
Total performance fees283.0
 327.1
 37.8

103.8

751.7
Investment income (loss)
     


Realized60.3
 (20.6) 5.1

0.1

44.9
Unrealized(11.0) 1.4
 15.3

(0.3)
5.4
Total investment income (loss)49.3
 (19.2) 20.4
 (0.2)
50.3
Interest income3.4
 1.7
 4.7
 0.4
 10.2
Other income6.0
 1.6
 4.7
 0.5
 12.8
Total revenues886.3
 562.5
 264.2
 245.6

1,958.6
Segment Expenses
     
  
Compensation and benefits
     


Direct base compensation210.8
 72.1
 87.4
 66.8

437.1
Indirect base compensation78.8
 39.1
 32.6

13.7

164.2
Equity-based compensation69.3
 26.3
 17.6

6.4

119.6
Performance fee related
     


Realized472.1
 37.6
 17.6

63.2
 590.5
Unrealized(342.6) 81.9
 0.6
 27.6

(232.5)
Total compensation and benefits488.4
 257.0
 155.8

177.7

1,078.9
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses131.9
 67.1
 250.0

34.5

483.5
Depreciation and amortization expense13.6
 5.9
 6.2
 3.3

29.0
Interest expense28.2
 16.0
 11.3
 5.8
 61.3
Total expenses662.1
 346.0
 423.3

221.3

1,652.7
Economic Income (Loss)$224.2
 $216.5
 $(159.1) $24.3
 $305.9
(-) Net Performance Fees153.5
 207.6
 19.6
 13.0
 393.7
(-) Investment Income (Loss)49.3
 (19.2) 20.4

(0.2)
50.3
(+) Equity-based Compensation69.3
 26.3
 17.6

6.4

119.6
(+) Net Interest24.8
 14.3
 6.6
 5.4
 51.1
(=) Fee Related Earnings$115.5
 $68.7
 $(174.9)
$23.3
 $32.6
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees588.4
 15.5
 19.0

2.4

625.3
(+) Realized Investment Income (Loss)60.3
 (20.6) 5.1

0.1

44.9
(+) Net Interest(24.8) (14.3) (6.6) (5.4) (51.1)
(=) Distributable Earnings$739.4
 $49.3
 $(157.4) $20.4

$651.7
Segment assets as of December 31, 2016$2,435.8
 $1,515.0
 $656.4

$850.1
 $5,457.3

 December 31, 2021 and the Year Then Ended
 
Global
Private
Equity(1)
Global
Credit
Global
Investment
Solutions(2)
Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$1,111.8 $314.4 $228.4 $1,654.6 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other34.3 62.2 0.5 97.0 
Fee related performance revenues— 43.2 — 43.2 
Total fund level fee revenues1,146.1 419.8 228.9 1,794.8 
Realized performance revenues2,757.8 (6.0)186.8 2,938.6 
Realized principal investment income167.8 31.9 9.8 209.5 
Interest income1.4 5.6 0.2 7.2 
Total revenues4,073.1 451.3 425.7 4,950.1 
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits546.2 237.1 108.2 891.5 
Realized performance revenues related compensation1,243.6 (2.7)168.1 1,409.0 
Total compensation and benefits1,789.8 234.4 276.3 2,300.5 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses172.5 63.1 32.0 267.6 
Depreciation and amortization expense25.1 8.0 4.5 37.6 
Interest expense63.8 26.1 10.8 100.7 
Total expenses2,051.2 331.6 323.6 2,706.4 
Distributable Earnings$2,021.9 $119.7 $102.1 $2,243.7 
(-) Realized net performance revenues1,514.2 (3.3)18.7 1,529.6 
(-) Realized principal investment income167.8 31.9 9.8 209.5 
(+) Net interest62.4 20.5 10.6 93.5 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$402.3 $111.6 $84.2 $598.1 
Segment assets as of December 31, 2021$10,282.4 $2,206.6 $2,009.2 $14,498.2 

(1) On August 31, 2021, the Company sold 100% of its interest in its local Brazilian management entity and entered into a sub-advisory agreement with the acquiring company, which will provide advisory services with respect to Carlyle’s Brazilian portfolio. The Company recorded a loss on the sale and related transaction costs of $4.7 million, which is included in other non-operating expenses (income) on the consolidated statements of operations, as well as a foreign currency translation loss of $14.7 million related to amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is primarily included in general, administrative and other expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. These amounts are excluded from the Company’s segment reporting.
(2) On April 1, 2021, the Company sold 100% of its interest in Metropolitan Real Estate (“MRE”) and recorded a $5 million gain on the sale, which is included in other non-operating expenses (income) on the consolidated statements of operations. This amount is excluded from the Company’s segment reporting. The Company retained its existing investments in and commitments to the MRE funds, as well as its interest in the net accrued performance allocations in existing funds.


238
228


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The following tables present the financial data for the Partnership’s fourCompany’s three reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2015:
2020:
 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Corporate
Private
Equity
 Real Assets Global Credit Investment
Solutions
 Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues         
Fund level fee revenues         
Fund management fees$577.4
 $255.9
 $210.7
 $153.9
 $1,197.9
Portfolio advisory fees, net14.3
 0.4
 0.7
 
 15.4
Transaction fees, net7.7
 2.1
 
 
 9.8
Total fund level fee revenues599.4
 258.4
 211.4
 153.9
 1,223.1
Performance fees         
Realized1,209.5
 163.2
 38.0
 24.1
 1,434.8
Unrealized(523.1) (42.5) (63.1) 103.6
 (525.1)
Total performance fees686.4
 120.7
 (25.1) 127.7
 909.7
Investment income (loss)         
Realized23.3
 (93.6) 5.4
 0.1
 (64.8)
Unrealized(5.2) 63.1
 (15.7) 0.2
 42.4
Total investment income (loss)18.1
 (30.5) (10.3) 0.3
 (22.4)
Interest income1.5
 0.3
 2.8
 0.2
 4.8
Other income9.8
 2.6
 3.9
 0.9
 17.2
Total revenues1,315.2
 351.5
 182.7
 283.0
 2,132.4
Segment Expenses         
Compensation and benefits         
Direct base compensation224.2
 70.0
 101.2
 82.3
 477.7
Indirect base compensation91.5
 39.3
 28.3
 13.0
 172.1
Equity-based compensation65.1
 25.0
 19.0
 12.4
 121.5
Performance fee related         
Realized540.9
 68.5
 16.6
 20.3
 646.3
Unrealized(221.7) 26.3
 (27.7) 94.8
 (128.3)
Total compensation and benefits700.0
 229.1
 137.4
 222.8
 1,289.3
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses172.4
 74.6
 69.8
 46.0
 362.8
Depreciation and amortization expense12.5
 4.3
 5.0
 3.8
 25.6
Interest expense30.8
 10.6
 10.8
 5.9
 58.1
Total expenses915.7
 318.6
 223.0
 278.5
 1,735.8
Economic Income (Loss)$399.5
 $32.9
 $(40.3) $4.5
 $396.6
(-) Net Performance Fees367.2
 25.9
 (14.0) 12.6
 391.7
(-) Investment Income (Loss)18.1
 (30.5) (10.3) 0.3
 (22.4)
(+) Equity-based Compensation65.1
 25.0
 19.0
 12.4
 121.5
(+) Net Interest29.3
 10.3
 8.0
 5.7
 53.3
(+) Reserve for Litigation and Contingencies26.8
 9.2
 9.0
 5.0
 50.0
(=) Fee Related Earnings$135.4
 $82.0
 $20.0
 $14.7
 $252.1
(+) Realized Net Performance Fees668.6
 94.7
 21.4
 3.8
 788.5
(+) Realized Investment Income (loss)23.3
 (93.6) 5.4
 0.1
 (64.8)
(+) Net Interest(29.3) (10.3) (8.0) (5.7) (53.3)
(=) Distributable Earnings$798.0
 $72.8
 $38.8
 $12.9
 $922.5

 Year Ended December 31, 2020
 Global
Private
Equity
Global
Credit
Global
Investment
Solutions
Total
 (Dollars in millions)
Segment Revenues
Fund level fee revenues
Fund management fees$1,042.0 $288.3 $193.0 $1,523.3 
Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other22.8 34.0 0.1 56.9 
Fee related performance revenues— 35.9 — 35.9 
Total fund level fee revenues1,064.8 358.2 193.1 1,616.1 
Realized performance revenues404.5 26.5 155.1 586.1 
Realized principal investment income52.0 18.7 2.3 73.0 
Interest income3.3 10.4 0.6 14.3 
Total revenues1,524.6 413.8 351.1 2,289.5 
Segment Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits501.9 206.1 113.5 821.5 
Realized performance revenues related compensation183.0 12.2 144.6 339.8 
Total compensation and benefits684.9 218.3 258.1 1,161.3 
General, administrative, and other indirect expenses157.9 45.7 37.8 241.4 
Depreciation and amortization expense22.0 7.0 4.5 33.5 
Interest expense55.3 26.6 9.3 91.2 
Total expenses920.1 297.6 309.7 1,527.4 
Distributable Earnings$604.5 $116.2 $41.4 $762.1 
(-) Realized net performance revenues221.5 14.3 10.5 246.3 
(-) Realized principal investment income52.0 18.7 2.3 73.0 
(+) Net interest52.0 16.2 8.7 76.9 
(=) Fee Related Earnings$383.0 $99.4 $37.3 $519.7 
 



















239
229


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




The following tables reconcile the Total Segments to the Partnership’sCompany’s Total Assets and Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes as of and for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
December 31, 2017 and the Year then Ended December 31, 2022 and the Year then Ended
Total Reportable
Segments
 Consolidated
Funds
 Reconciling
Items
   Carlyle
Consolidated
Total Reportable
Segments
Consolidated
Funds
Reconciling
Items
 Carlyle
Consolidated
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
Revenues$3,378.8
 $177.7
 $119.7
 (a)  $3,676.2
Revenues$4,401.4 $311.0 $(273.7)(a) $4,438.7 
Expenses$2,109.5
 $240.4
 $282.4
 (b)  $2,632.3
Expenses$2,492.4 $255.3 $77.0 (b) $2,824.7 
Other income$
 $123.5
 $(35.1) (c)  $88.4
Economic income$1,269.3
 $60.8
 $(197.8) (d)  $1,132.3
Other lossOther loss$ $(41.5)$ (c) $(41.5)
Distributable earningsDistributable earnings$1,909.0 $14.2 $(350.7)(d) $1,572.5 
Total assets$7,543.1
 $4,962.7
 $(225.2) (e)  $12,280.6
Total assets$14,792.8 $7,213.3 $(603.1)(e) $21,403.0 
 
December 31, 2016 and the Year then Ended December 31, 2021 and the Year then Ended
Total Reportable
Segments
 Consolidated
Funds
 Reconciling
Items
   Carlyle
Consolidated
Total Reportable
Segments
Consolidated
Funds
Reconciling
Items
 Carlyle
Consolidated
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
Revenues$1,958.6
 $166.9
 $148.8
 (a)  $2,274.3
Revenues$4,950.1 $253.2 $3,578.8 (a) $8,782.1 
Expenses$1,652.7
 $153.1
 $436.3
 (b)  $2,242.1
Expenses$2,706.4 $217.8 $1,832.9 (b) $4,757.1 
Other income$
 $13.1
 $
 (c)  $13.1
Other income$— $2.5 $— (c) $2.5 
Economic income$305.9
 $26.9
 $(287.5) (d)  $45.3
Distributable earningsDistributable earnings$2,243.7 $37.9 $1,745.9 (d) $4,027.5 
Total assets$5,457.3
 $4,684.7
 $(169.0) (e)  $9,973.0
Total assets$14,498.2 $6,948.0 $(195.8)(e) $21,250.4 
The following table reconciles the Total Segments to the Partnership’sCompany’s Income Before Provision for Income Taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015:2020:
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2020
Total Reportable
Segments
 Consolidated
Funds
 Reconciling
Items
   Carlyle
Consolidated
Total Reportable
Segments
Consolidated
Funds
Reconciling
Items
 Carlyle
Consolidated
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
Revenues$2,132.4
 $975.5
 $(101.7) (a)  $3,006.2
Revenues$2,289.5 $226.8 $418.3 (a) $2,934.6 
Expenses$1,735.8
 $1,258.8
 $473.8
 (b)  $3,468.4
Expenses$1,527.4 $206.2 $599.7 (b) $2,333.3 
Other income$
 $886.9
 $(22.5) (c)  $864.4
Economic income$396.6
 $603.6
 $(598.0) (d)  $402.2
Other lossOther loss$— $(21.3)$— (c) $(21.3)
Distributable earningsDistributable earnings$762.1 $(0.7)$(181.4)(d) $580.0 
 
(a)The Revenues adjustment principally represents fund management and performance fees earned from the Consolidated Funds that were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Partnership’s total revenues, adjustments for amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, adjustments related to expenses associated with the investments in NGP Management and its affiliates that are included in operating captions or are excluded from the segment results, adjustments to reflect the Partnership’s share of Urbplan’s net losses as a component of investment income until Urbplan was deconsolidated during the third quarter of 2017, the inclusion of tax expenses associated with certain performance fees, and adjustments to reflect the Partnership’s ownership interests in Claren Road (through January 2017) and ESG (through June 2016) that were included in Revenues in the Partnership’s segment reporting.

(a)The Revenues adjustment principally represents unrealized performance revenues, unrealized principal investment income (loss) (including Fortitude), the principal investment loss from dilution of the indirect investment in Fortitude, revenues earned from the Consolidated Funds which were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Company’s total revenues, adjustments for amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, adjustments related to expenses associated with the investments in NGP Management and its affiliates that are included in operating captions or are excluded from the segment results, adjustments to reflect the reimbursement of certain costs incurred on behalf of Carlyle funds on a net basis, and the inclusion of tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance revenues, as detailed below:
240
230


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Unrealized performance revenues$(142.5)$3,155.6 $1,031.0 
Unrealized principal investment income(38.3)351.8 (556.2)
Principal investment loss from dilution of indirect investment in Fortitude(176.9)— — 
Adjusted unrealized principal investment income from direct investment in Fortitude — (104.4)
Adjustments related to expenses associated with investments in NGP Management and its affiliates(12.9)(13.7)(15.3)
Tax expense associated with certain foreign performance revenues0.1 0.2 0.5 
Non-controlling interests and other adjustments to present certain costs on a net basis119.0 159.6 96.6 
Elimination of revenues of Consolidated Funds(22.2)(74.7)(33.9)
$(273.7)$3,578.8 $418.3 

(b)The Expenses adjustment represents the elimination of intercompany expenses of the Consolidated Funds payable to the Partnership, the inclusion of certain tax expenses associated with performance fee compensation, adjustments related to expenses associated with the investment in NGP Management that are included in operating captions, adjustments to reflect the Partnership’s share of Urbplan’s net losses as a component of investment income until Urbplan was deconsolidated during the third quarter of 2017, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, charges and credits associated with Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items and adjustments to reflect the Partnership’s economic interests in Claren Road (through January 2017) and ESG (through June 2016) as detailed below (Dollars in millions):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Equity-based compensation issued in conjunction with the initial public offering, acquisitions and strategic investments$241.2
 $223.4
 $259.8
Acquisition related charges and amortization of intangibles and impairment35.7
 94.2
 288.8
Other non-operating (income) expense(71.4) (11.2) (7.4)
Tax provision associated with performance fees(9.2) (15.1) (14.9)
Non-Carlyle economic interests in acquired business115.7
 159.0
 160.3
Severance and other adjustments13.2
 10.6
 6.7
Elimination of expenses of Consolidated Funds(42.8) (24.6) (219.5)
 $282.4
 $436.3
 $473.8
The following table reconciles the total segments fund level fee revenue to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, the Company’s consolidated fund management fees, for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
Year Ended December 31,
202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Total Reportable Segments - Fund level fee revenues$2,237.3 $1,794.8 $1,616.1 
Adjustments(1)
(207.2)(127.3)(130.1)
Carlyle Consolidated - Fund management fees$2,030.1 $1,667.5 $1,486.0 

(1) Adjustments represent the reclassification of NGP management fees from principal investment income, the
reclassification of fee related performance revenues from business development companies and other products, management fees earned from consolidated CLOs which were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Company’s fund management fees, the reclassification of a $12.7 million loss related to the purchase of investor interests in a Global Investment Solutions product from fund management fees to principal investment income (loss), and the reclassification of certain amounts included in portfolio advisory fees, net and other in the segment results that are included in interest and other income in the U.S. GAAP results.
    
(c)The Other Income (Loss) adjustment results from the Consolidated Funds which were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Partnership’s total Other Income (Loss).

(d)The following table is a reconciliation of Income Before Provision for Income Taxes to Economic Income, to Fee Related Earnings, and to Distributable Earnings (Dollars in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Income before provision for income taxes$1,132.3
 $45.3
 $402.2
Adjustments:     
Equity-based compensation issued in conjunction with the initial public offering, acquisitions and strategic investments241.2
 223.4
 259.8
Acquisition related charges and amortization of intangibles and impairment35.7
 94.2
 288.8
Other non-operating (income) expense(1)
(71.4) (11.2) (7.4)
Tax provision associated with performance fees(9.2) (15.1) (14.9)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in Consolidated entities(72.5) (41.0) (537.9)
Severance and other adjustments13.2
 10.3
 6.0
Economic Income$1,269.3
 $305.9
 $396.6
Net performance fees(2)
1,177.8
 393.7
 391.7
Investment income (loss)(2)
47.2
 50.3
 (22.4)
Equity-based compensation123.9
 119.6
 121.5
Net Interest48.8
 51.1
 53.3
Reserve for litigation and contingencies(25.0) 
 50.0
Fee Related Earnings$192.0
 $32.6
 $252.1
Realized performance fees, net of related compensation552.6
 625.3
 788.5
Realized investment income (loss)(2)
(25.8) 44.9
 (64.8)
Net Interest(48.8) (51.1) (53.3)
Distributable Earnings$670.0
 $651.7
 $922.5

(b)The Expenses adjustment represents the elimination of intercompany expenses of the Consolidated Funds payable to the Company, the inclusion of equity-based compensation, certain tax expenses associated with realized performance revenues related compensation, and unrealized performance revenues related compensation, adjustments related to expenses associated with the investment in NGP Management that are included in operating captions, adjustments to reflect the reimbursement of certain costs incurred on behalf of Carlyle funds on a net basis, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, and charges and credits associated with Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items, as detailed below:
241
231


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Unrealized performance and fee related performance revenue related compensation expense$(326.2)$1,549.4 $432.3 
Equity-based compensation161.9 172.9 116.6 
Acquisition or disposition-related charges and amortization of intangibles and impairment187.4 37.7 38.1 
Tax expense associated with certain foreign performance revenues related compensation2.9 (17.3)(8.4)
Non-controlling interests and other adjustments to present certain costs on a net basis82.7 78.5 55.8 
Debt extinguishment costs 10.2 — 
Right-of-use asset impairment 26.8 — 
Other adjustments, including severance and C-Corp. conversion costs in 202012.4 14.2 8.0 
Elimination of expenses of Consolidated Funds(44.1)(39.5)(42.7)
$77.0 $1,832.9 $599.7 
(c)    The Other Income (Loss) adjustment results from the Consolidated Funds which were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Company’s total Other Income (Loss).

(d)    The following table is a reconciliation of Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes to Distributable Earnings and to Fee Related Earnings:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(Dollars in millions)
Income before provision for income taxes$1,572.5 $4,027.5 $580.0 
Adjustments:
Net unrealized performance and fee related performance revenues(183.7)(1,606.2)(598.7)
Unrealized principal investment (income) loss(1)
38.3 (351.8)556.2 
Principal investment loss from dilution of indirect investment in Fortitude176.9 — — 
Adjusted unrealized principal investment (income) loss from direct investment in Fortitude(2)
 — 104.4 
Equity-based compensation(3)
161.9 172.9 116.6 
Acquisition or disposition-related charges, including amortization of intangibles and impairment187.4 37.7 38.1 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(59.7)(70.5)(34.6)
Tax expense associated with certain foreign performance revenues3.0 (17.1)(7.9)
Debt extinguishment costs 10.2 — 
Right-of-use impairment 26.8 — 
Other adjustments including severance and C-Corp. conversion costs in 202012.4 14.2 8.0 
Distributable Earnings$1,909.0 $2,243.7 $762.1 
Realized performance revenues, net of related compensation(4)
998.5 1,529.6 246.3 
Realized principal investment income(4)
150.6 209.5 73.0 
Net interest74.5 93.5 76.9 
Fee Related Earnings$834.4 $598.1 $519.7 
 
(1) Included in other non-operating (income) expense forAdjustments to unrealized principal investment income (loss) during the year ended December 31, 20172020 are inclusive of $211.8 million of unrealized gains, resulting from changes in the fair value of embedded derivatives related to certain reinsurance contracts included in Fortitude’s U.S. GAAP financial statements prior to the contribution of the Company’s investment in Fortitude to Carlyle FRL on June 2, 2020. At the time of the contribution of the Company’s investment to Carlyle FRL, the Company began accounting for its investment under the equity method based on its net asset value in the fund, which is a $71.5 million adjustmentan investment company that accounts for its investment in Fortitude at fair value.
232

The Carlyle Group Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Adjusted unrealized principal investment income (loss) from the direct investment in Fortitude represents 19.9% of Fortitude’s estimated net income (loss), excluding the unrealized gains (losses) related to embedded derivatives, prior to the contribution of the Company’s investment in Fortitude to Carlyle FRL on June 2, 2020.
(3) Equity-based compensation for the revaluationyears ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 includes amounts that are presented in principal investment income and general, administrative and other expenses in the Company’s U.S. GAAP consolidated statements of the tax receivable agreement liability as result of the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.operations.
    
(2)(4)    See reconciliation to most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure below:
 Year Ended December 31, 2022
 Carlyle
Consolidated
Adjustments(3)
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance revenues$1,327.5 $653.2 $1,980.7 
Performance revenues related compensation expense719.9 262.3 982.2 
Net performance revenues$607.6 $390.9 $998.5 
Principal investment income (loss)$570.5 $(419.9)$150.6 
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Carlyle
Consolidated
 
Adjustments(3)
 Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance fees     
Realized$1,097.3
 $(12.0) $1,085.3
Unrealized996.6
 93.0
 1,089.6
Total performance fees2,093.9
 81.0
 2,174.9
Performance fee related compensation expense     
Realized520.7
 12.0
 532.7
Unrealized467.6
 (3.2) 464.4
Total performance fee related compensation expense988.3
 8.8
 997.1
Net performance fees     
Realized576.6
 (24.0) 552.6
Unrealized529.0
 96.2
 625.2
Total net performance fees$1,105.6
 $72.2
 $1,177.8
Investment income (loss)     
Realized$70.4
 $(96.2) $(25.8)
Unrealized161.6
 (88.6) 73.0
Total investment income (loss)$232.0
 $(184.8) $47.2


 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Carlyle
Consolidated
 
Adjustments(3)
 Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance fees     
Realized$1,129.5
 $86.3
 $1,215.8
Unrealized(377.7) (86.4) (464.1)
Total performance fees751.8
 (0.1) 751.7
Performance fee related compensation expense     
Realized580.5
 10.0
 590.5
Unrealized(227.4) (5.1) (232.5)
Total performance fee related compensation expense353.1
 4.9
 358.0
Net performance fees     
Realized549.0
 76.3
 625.3
Unrealized(150.3) (81.3) (231.6)
Total net performance fees$398.7
 $(5.0) $393.7
Investment income (loss)     
Realized$112.9
 $(68.0) $44.9
Unrealized47.6
 (42.2) 5.4
Total investment income (loss)$160.5
 $(110.2) $50.3
 Year Ended December 31, 2021
 Carlyle
Consolidated
Adjustments(3)
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance revenues$6,084.6 $(3,146.0)$2,938.6 
Performance revenues related compensation expense2,961.0 (1,552.0)1,409.0 
Net performance revenues$3,123.6 $(1,594.0)$1,529.6 
Principal investment income (loss)$637.3 $(427.8)$209.5 
 

 Year Ended December 31, 2020
 Carlyle
Consolidated
Adjustments(3)
Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance revenues$1,635.9 $(1,049.8)$586.1 
Performance revenues related compensation expense779.1 (439.3)339.8 
Net performance revenues$856.8 $(610.5)$246.3 
Principal investment income (loss)$(540.7)$613.7 $73.0 
(3)Adjustments to performance revenues and principal investment income (loss) relate to (i) unrealized performance allocations net of related compensation expense and unrealized principal investment income, which are excluded from the segment results, (ii) amounts earned from the Consolidated Funds, which were eliminated in the U.S. GAAP consolidation but were included in the segment results, (iii) amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, which were excluded from the segment results, (iv) the reclassification of NGP performance revenues, which are included in principal investment income in the U.S. GAAP financial statements, (v) the reclassification of fee related performance revenues, which are included in fund level fee revenues in the segment results, and (vi) the reclassification of tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance revenues. Adjustments to principal investment income (loss) also include the reclassification of earnings for the investments in NGP Management and its affiliates to the appropriate operating captions for the segment results, and the exclusion of charges associated with the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates that are excluded from the segment results and the exclusion of the principal investment loss from dilution of the indirect investment in Fortitude.

(e)The Total Assets adjustment represents the addition of the assets of the Consolidated Funds that were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Company’s total assets.
242
233


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements



 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Carlyle
Consolidated
 
Adjustments(3)
 Total
Reportable
Segments
 (Dollars in millions)
Performance fees     
Realized$1,441.9
 $(7.1) $1,434.8
Unrealized(617.0) 91.9
 (525.1)
Total performance fees824.9
 84.8
 909.7
Performance fee related compensation expense     
Realized650.5
 (4.2) 646.3
Unrealized(139.6) 11.3
 (128.3)
Total performance fee related compensation expense510.9
 7.1
 518.0
Net performance fees     
Realized791.4
 (2.9) 788.5
Unrealized(477.4) 80.6
 (396.8)
Total net performance fees$314.0
 $77.7
 $391.7
Investment income     
Realized$32.9
 $(97.7) $(64.8)
Unrealized(17.7) 60.1
 42.4
Total investment income$15.2
 $(37.6) $(22.4)
(3)Adjustments to performance fees and investment income (loss) relate to (i) amounts earned from the Consolidated Funds, which were eliminated in the U.S. GAAP consolidation but were included in the segment results, (ii) amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, which were excluded from the segment results and (iii) the reclassification of NGP performance fees, which are included in investment income in the U.S. GAAP financial statements, and (iv) the reclassification of certain tax expenses associated with performance fees. Adjustments to investment income (loss) also include the reclassification of earnings for the investments in NGP Management and its affiliates to the appropriate operating captions for the segment results, the exclusion of charges associated with the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates that are excluded from the segment results, and adjustments to reflect the Partnership’s share of Urbplan’s net losses as investment losses for the segment results until Urbplan was deconsolidated during the third quarter of 2017. Adjustments are also included in these financial statement captions to reflect the Partnership’s economic interest in Claren Road (through January 2017) and ESG (through June 2016).

(e)The Total Assets adjustment represents the addition of the assets of the Consolidated Funds that were eliminated in consolidation to arrive at the Partnership’s total assets.

243


The Carlyle Group L.P.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Information by Geographic Location
Carlyle primarily transacts business in the United States and a significant amount of its revenues are generated domestically. The PartnershipCompany has established investment vehicles whose primary focus is making investments in specified geographical locations. The tables below present consolidated revenues and assets based on the geographical focus of the associated investment vehicle.
 
 Total RevenuesTotal Assets
 Share%Share%
 (Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Americas(1)
$2,560.0 58 %$11,662.8 55 %
EMEA(2)
1,603.8 36 %8,632.9 40 %
Asia-Pacific(3)
274.9 6 %1,107.3 5 %
Total$4,438.7 100 %$21,403.0 100 %
Total RevenuesTotal Assets
Total Revenues Total Assets Share%Share%
Share % Share % (Dollars in millions)
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2017       
Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2021
Americas(1)
$2,299.0
 62% $5,033.5
 41%
Americas(1)
$5,434.6 62 %$10,874.2 51 %
EMEA(2)
837.6
 23% 6,085.6
 50%
EMEA(2)
2,629.3 30 %8,920.4 42 %
Asia-Pacific(3)
539.6
 15% 1,161.5
 9%
Asia-Pacific(3)
718.2 %1,455.8 %
Total$3,676.2
 100% $12,280.6
 100%Total$8,782.1 100 %$21,250.4 100 %
 Total RevenuesTotal Assets
 Share%Share%
 (Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Americas(1)
$1,787.7 61 %$7,758.8 50 %
EMEA(2)
622.3 21 %6,807.0 43 %
Asia-Pacific(3)
524.6 18 %1,079.0 %
Total$2,934.6 100 %$15,644.8 100 %
(1)Relates to investment vehicles whose primary focus is the United States, Mexico or South America.
(2)Relates to investment vehicles whose primary focus is Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
(3)Relates to investment vehicles whose primary focus is Asia, including China, Japan, India and Australia.
 
234
 Total Revenues Total Assets
 Share % Share %
 (Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2016       
Americas(1)
$1,473.5
 65% $5,048.7
 50%
EMEA(2)
615.1
 27% 4,245.1
 43%
Asia-Pacific(3)
185.7
 8% 679.2
 7%
Total$2,274.3
 100% $9,973.0
 100%
 Total Revenues Total Assets
 Share % Share %
 (Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2015       
Americas(1)
$1,518.7
 51% $19,049.3
 59%
EMEA(2)
1,090.1
 36% 12,369.1
 39%
Asia-Pacific(3)
397.4
 13% 763.2
 2%
Total$3,006.2
 100% $32,181.6
 100%
(1)Relates to investment vehicles whose primary focus is the United States, Mexico or South America.
(2)Relates to investment vehicles whose primary focus is Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
(3)Relates to investment vehicles whose primary focus is Asia, including China, Japan, India and Australia.

244


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


17.Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Unaudited quarterly information for each of the three months in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below.
 Three Months Ended

March 31,
2017
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2017
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues$1,120.1
 $908.4
 $639.9
 $1,007.8
Expenses809.5
 705.4
 492.6
 624.8
Other income17.1
 40.7
 18.6
 12.0
Income before provision for income taxes$327.7
 $243.7
 $165.9
 $395.0
Net income$321.9
 $230.5
 $167.2
 $287.8
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders$83.0
 $57.6
 $44.6
 $52.9
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. per common unit(1)

 
 
 
Basic$0.97
 $0.65
 $0.47
 $0.53
Diluted$0.90
 $0.59
 $0.43
 $0.49
Distributions declared per common unit(2)
$0.16
 $0.10
 $0.42
 $0.56
 Three Months Ended

March 31,
2016
 June 30,
2016
 September 30,
2016
 December 31,
2016
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues$483.1
 $608.0
 $607.3
 $575.9
Expenses459.4
 546.9
 661.8
 574.0
Other income (loss)(8.4) 6.7
 4.8
 10.0
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes$15.3
 $67.8
 $(49.7) $11.9
Net income (loss)$7.9
 $43.5
 $(50.7) $14.6
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. common unitholders$8.4
 $6.1
 $0.8
 $(8.9)
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. per common unit(1)

 
 
 
Basic$0.10
 $0.07
 $0.01
 $(0.11)
Diluted$0.01
 $0.07
 $(0.02) $(0.16)
Distributions declared per common unit(2)
$0.29
 $0.26
 $0.63
 $0.50
(1)The sum of the quarterly earnings per common unit amounts may not equal the total for the year due to the effects of rounding and dilution.
(2)Distributions declared reflects the calendar date of the declaration of each distribution.
18.Subsequent Events
In February 2018,2023, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership declared a distributiondividend of $0.33$0.325 per common unitshare to common unitholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2018,22, 2023, payable on March 1, 2023.
On February 27, 2018.
In February 2018,6, 2023, the Company announced that the Board of Directors of the general partnerCompany has appointed Harvey M. Schwartz as Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership declaredCompany and a distribution formember of the first quarterBoard of 2018Directors, effective February 15, 2023 (the “Commencement Date”). On the Commencement Date, Mr. Schwartz will receive inducement equity awards with a combined grant date value of $0.367188$180 million, of which $108 million will be granted in the form of performance-based restricted stock units which will be eligible to vest in five equal tranches and $72 million will be granted in the form of time-based restricted stock units which will be eligible to vest ratably in four equal installments. The number of shares of common stock underlying the performance-based award will be determined by dividing the $108 million grant value by the per preferred unit to preferred unitholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2018, payable on March 15, 2018. See Note 14 for more informationshare accounting fair value on the preferred units.Commencement Date, while the number of shares of common stock underlying the time-based award will be determined by dividing the $72 million grant value by the per share closing stock price on the Commencement Date.


245
235


The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


19.Supplemental Financial Information
The following supplemental financial information illustrates the consolidating effects of the Consolidated Funds on the Partnership’sCompany’s financial position as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020. The supplemental statement of cash flows is presented without effects of the Consolidated Funds.
 As of December 31, 2022
 Consolidated
Operating
Entities
Consolidated
Funds
EliminationsConsolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $— $— $1,360.7 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds— 209.0 — 209.0 
Restricted cash0.8 — — 0.8 
Corporate treasury investments20.0 — — 20.0 
Accrued performance fees— — — — 
Investments, including performance allocations of $7,117.710,989.9 — (222.0)10,767.9 
Investments of Consolidated Funds— 6,894.4 — 6,894.4 
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net960.5 — (381.1)579.4 
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net— 101.9 — 101.9 
Fixed assets, net139.9 — — 139.9 
Lease right-of-use assets, net337.0 — — 337.0 
Deposits and other70.4 8.0 — 78.4 
Intangible assets, net897.8 — — 897.8 
Deferred tax assets15.8 — — 15.8 
Total assets$14,792.8 $7,213.3 $(603.1)$21,403.0 
Liabilities and equity
Debt obligations$2,271.7 $— $— $2,271.7 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds— 6,279.7 (374.5)5,905.2 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities369.2 — — 369.2 
Accrued compensation and benefits4,320.9 — — 4,320.9 
Due to affiliates346.1 16.5 (0.1)362.5 
Deferred revenue126.4 — — 126.4 
Deferred tax liabilities402.7 — — 402.7 
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds— 279.7 (0.4)279.3 
Lease liabilities502.9 — — 502.9 
Accrued giveback obligations40.9 — — 40.9 
Total liabilities8,380.8 6,575.9 (375.0)14,581.7 
Common stock3.6 — — 3.6 
Additional paid-in capital3,138.5 238.7 (238.7)3,138.5 
Retained earnings3,401.1 — — 3,401.1 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(319.5)(13.3)10.6 (322.2)
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities188.3 412.0 — 600.3 
Total equity6,412.0 637.4 (228.1)6,821.3 
Total liabilities and equity$14,792.8 $7,213.3 $(603.1)$21,403.0 
As of December 31, 2017As of December 31, 2021
Consolidated
Operating
Entities
 Consolidated
Funds
 Eliminations Consolidated Consolidated
Operating
Entities
Consolidated
Funds
EliminationsConsolidated
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
Assets       Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,000.1
 $
 $
 $1,000.1
Cash and cash equivalents$2,469.5 $— $— $2,469.5 
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds
 377.6
 
 377.6
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds— 147.8 — 147.8 
Restricted cash28.7
 
 
 28.7
Restricted cash5.6 — — 5.6 
Corporate treasury investments376.3
 
 
 376.3
Accrued performance fees3,670.6
 
 
 3,670.6
Investments1,844.2
 
 (219.9) 1,624.3
Investments, including performance allocations of $8,133.0 millionInvestments, including performance allocations of $8,133.0 million11,022.5 — (190.5)10,832.0 
Investments of Consolidated Funds
 4,534.3
 
 4,534.3
Investments of Consolidated Funds— 6,661.0 — 6,661.0 
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net262.4
 
 (5.3) 257.1
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net384.9 — (5.3)379.6 
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net
 50.8
 
 50.8
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net— 138.8 — 138.8 
Fixed assets, net100.4
 
 
 100.4
Fixed assets, net143.9 — — 143.9 
Lease right-of-use assets, netLease right-of-use assets, net361.1 — — 361.1 
Deposits and other54.1
 
 
 54.1
Deposits and other61.3 0.4 — 61.7 
Intangible assets, net35.9
 
 
 35.9
Intangible assets, net34.9 — — 34.9 
Deferred tax assets170.4
 
 
 170.4
Deferred tax assets14.5 — — 14.5 
Total assets$7,543.1
 $4,962.7
 $(225.2) $12,280.6
Total assets$14,498.2 $6,948.0 $(195.8)$21,250.4 
Liabilities and partners’ capital       
Liabilities and equityLiabilities and equity
Debt obligations$1,573.6
 $
 $
 $1,573.6
Debt obligations$2,071.6 $— $— $2,071.6 
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds
 4,303.8
 
 4,303.8
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds— 5,890.0 — 5,890.0 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities355.1
 
 
 355.1
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities379.7 — — 379.7 
Accrued compensation and benefits2,222.6
 
 
 2,222.6
Accrued compensation and benefits4,955.0 — — 4,955.0 
Due to affiliates229.9
 
 
 229.9
Due to affiliates388.1 — — 388.1 
Deferred revenue82.1
 
 
 82.1
Deferred revenue120.8 — — 120.8 
Deferred tax liabilities75.6
 
 
 75.6
Deferred tax liabilities487.1 — — 487.1 
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds
 422.1
 
 422.1
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds— 684.0 (0.1)683.9 
Lease liabilitiesLease liabilities537.8 — — 537.8 
Accrued giveback obligations66.8
 
 
 66.8
Accrued giveback obligations30.2 — — 30.2 
Total liabilities4,605.7
 4,725.9
 
 9,331.6
Total liabilities8,970.3 6,574.0 (0.1)15,544.2 
Series A preferred units387.5
 
 
 387.5
Partners’ capital701.8
 62.8
 (62.8) 701.8
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(72.2) 4.1
 (4.6) (72.7)
Common stockCommon stock3.6 — — 3.6 
Additional paid-in capitalAdditional paid-in capital2,717.6 198.6 (198.6)2,717.6 
Retained earningsRetained earnings2,805.3 — — 2,805.3 
Accumulated other comprehensive lossAccumulated other comprehensive loss(245.7)(4.7)2.9 (247.5)
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities391.4
 13.3
 
 404.7
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities247.1 180.1 — 427.2 
Non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings1,528.9
 156.6
 (157.8) 1,527.7
Total partners’ capital2,937.4
 236.8
 (225.2) 2,949.0
Total liabilities and partners’ capital$7,543.1
 $4,962.7
 $(225.2) $12,280.6
Total equityTotal equity5,527.9 374.0 (195.7)5,706.2 
Total liabilities and equityTotal liabilities and equity$14,498.2 $6,948.0 $(195.8)$21,250.4 

 As of December 31, 2016
 Consolidated
Operating
Entities
 Consolidated
Funds
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents$670.9
 $
 $
 $670.9
Cash and cash equivalents held at Consolidated Funds
 761.5
 
 761.5
Restricted cash13.1
 
 
 13.1
Corporate treasury investments190.2
 
 
 190.2
Accrued performance fees2,481.1
 
 
 2,481.1
Investments1,272.2
 
 (165.2) 1,107.0
Investments of Consolidated Funds
 3,893.7
 
 3,893.7
Due from affiliates and other receivables, net231.0
 
 (3.8) 227.2
Due from affiliates and other receivables of Consolidated Funds, net
 29.5
 
 29.5
Receivables and inventory of a real estate VIE145.4
 
 
 145.4
Fixed assets, net106.1
 
 
 106.1
Deposits and other39.4
 
 
 39.4
Other assets of a real estate VIE31.5
 
 
 31.5
Intangible assets, net42.0
 
 
 42.0
Deferred tax assets234.4
 
 
 234.4
Total assets$5,457.3
 $4,684.7
 $(169.0) $9,973.0
Liabilities and partners’ capital       
Debt obligations$1,265.2
 $
 $
 $1,265.2
Loans payable of Consolidated Funds
 3,866.3
 
 3,866.3
Loans payable of a real estate VIE at fair value (principal amount of $144.4 million)79.4
 
 
 79.4
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities369.8
 
 
 369.8
Accrued compensation and benefits1,661.8
 
 
 1,661.8
Due to affiliates223.4
 0.2
 
 223.6
Deferred revenue54.0
 
 
 54.0
Deferred tax liabilities76.6
 
 
 76.6
Other liabilities of Consolidated Funds
 669.0
 (32.0) 637.0
Other liabilities of a real estate VIE124.5
 
 
 124.5
Accrued giveback obligations160.8
 
 
 160.8
Total liabilities4,015.5
 4,535.5
 (32.0) 8,519.0
Partners’ capital403.1
 36.7
 (36.7) 403.1
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(94.9) (1.5) 1.2
 (95.2)
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities264.3
 13.5
 
 277.8
Non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings869.3
 100.5
 (101.5) 868.3
Total partners’ capital1,441.8
 149.2
 (137.0) 1,454.0
Total liabilities and partners’ capital$5,457.3
 $4,684.7
 $(169.0) $9,973.0


 





 Year Ended December 31, 2022
 Consolidated
Operating
Entities
Consolidated
Funds
EliminationsConsolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues
Fund management fees$2,056.7 $— $(26.6)$2,030.1 
Incentive fees63.8 — (0.1)63.7 
Investment income
Performance allocations1,332.8 — (5.3)1,327.5 
Principal investment income542.5 — 28.0 570.5 
Total investment income1,875.3 — 22.7 1,898.0 
Interest and other income154.1 — (18.2)135.9 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds— 311.0 — 311.0 
Total revenues4,149.9 311.0 (22.2)4,438.7 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits1,052.0 — — 1,052.0 
Equity-based compensation154.0 — — 154.0 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation719.9 — — 719.9 
Total compensation and benefits1,925.9 — — 1,925.9 
General, administrative and other expenses576.2 — (0.4)575.8 
Interest110.4 — — 110.4 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds— 255.3 (43.7)211.6 
Other non-operating expenses1.0 — — 1.0 
Total expenses2,613.5 255.3 (44.1)2,824.7 
Other income (loss)
Net investment losses of Consolidated Funds— (41.5)— (41.5)
Income before provision for income taxes1,536.4 14.2 21.9 1,572.5 
Provision for income taxes287.8 — — 287.8 
Net income1,248.6 14.2 21.9 1,284.7 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities23.6 — 36.1 59.7 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.$1,225.0 $14.2 $(14.2)$1,225.0 

 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Consolidated
Operating
Entities
 Consolidated
Funds
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues       
Fund management fees$1,045.4
 $
 $(18.5) $1,026.9
Performance fees       
Realized1,099.7
 
 (2.4) 1,097.3
Unrealized996.6
 
 
 996.6
Total performance fees2,096.3
 
 (2.4) 2,093.9
Investment income       
Realized77.5
 
 (7.1) 70.4
Unrealized166.3
 
 (4.7) 161.6
Total investment income243.8
 
 (11.8) 232.0
Interest and other income60.5
 
 (23.8) 36.7
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds
 177.7
 
 177.7
Revenue of a real estate VIE109.0
 
 
 109.0
Total revenues3,555.0
 177.7
 (56.5) 3,676.2
Expenses       
Compensation and benefits       
Base compensation652.7
 
 
 652.7
Equity-based compensation320.3
 
 
 320.3
Performance fee related       
Realized520.7
 
 
 520.7
Unrealized467.6
 
 
 467.6
Total compensation and benefits1,961.3
 
 
 1,961.3
General, administrative and other expenses276.8
 
 
 276.8
Interest65.5
 
 
 65.5
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds
 240.4
 (42.8) 197.6
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE and loss on deconsolidation202.5
 
 
 202.5
Other non-operating income(71.4) 
 
 (71.4)
Total expenses2,434.7
 240.4
 (42.8) 2,632.3
Other income       
Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds
 123.5
 (35.1) 88.4
Income before provision for income taxes1,120.3
 60.8
 (48.8) 1,132.3
Provision for income taxes124.9
 
 
 124.9
Net income995.4
 60.8
 (48.8) 1,007.4
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities60.5
 
 12.0
 72.5
Net income attributable to Carlyle Holdings934.9
 60.8
 (60.8) 934.9
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings690.8
 
 
 690.8
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.244.1
 60.8
 (60.8) 244.1
Net income attributable to Series A Preferred Unitholders6.0
 
 
 6.0
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. Common Unitholders$238.1
 $60.8
 $(60.8) $238.1


 Year Ended December 31, 2021
 Consolidated
Operating
Entities
Consolidated
Funds
EliminationsConsolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues
Fund management fees$1,691.5 $— $(24.0)$1,667.5 
Incentive fees48.8 — — 48.8 
Investment income
Performance allocations6,084.6 — — 6,084.6 
Principal investment income666.0 — (28.7)637.3 
Total investment income6,750.6 — (28.7)6,721.9 
Interest and other income112.7 — (22.0)90.7 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds— 253.2 — 253.2 
Total revenues8,603.6 253.2 (74.7)8,782.1 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits908.0 — — 908.0 
Equity-based compensation163.1 — — 163.1 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation2,961.0 — — 2,961.0 
Total compensation and benefits4,032.1 — — 4,032.1 
General, administrative and other expenses431.9 — (0.2)431.7 
Interest113.3 — — 113.3 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds— 217.8 (39.3)178.5 
Other non-operating expenses1.5 — — 1.5 
Total expenses4,578.8 217.8 (39.5)4,757.1 
Other income
Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds— 2.5 — 2.5 
Income before provision for income taxes4,024.8 37.9 (35.2)4,027.5 
Provision for income taxes982.3 — — 982.3 
Net income3,042.5 37.9 (35.2)3,045.2 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities67.8 — 2.7 70.5 
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.2,974.7 37.9 (37.9)2,974.7 


 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Consolidated
Operating
Entities
 
Consolidated
Funds
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues       
Fund management fees$1,090.3
 $
 $(14.2) $1,076.1
Performance fees       
Realized1,129.7
 
 (0.2) 1,129.5
Unrealized(377.7) 
 
 (377.7)
Total performance fees752.0
 
 (0.2) 751.8
Investment income       
Realized115.5
 
 (2.6) 112.9
Unrealized50.0
 
 (2.4) 47.6
Total investment income165.5
 
 (5.0) 160.5
Interest and other income38.9
 
 (15.0) 23.9
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds
 166.9
 
 166.9
Revenue of a real estate VIE95.1
 
 
 95.1
Total revenues2,141.8
 166.9
 (34.4) 2,274.3
Expenses       
Compensation and benefits       
Base compensation647.1
 
 
 647.1
Equity-based compensation334.6
 
 
 334.6
Performance fee related       
Realized580.5
 
 
 580.5
Unrealized(227.4) 
 
 (227.4)
Total compensation and benefits1,334.8
 
 
 1,334.8
General, administrative and other expenses521.1
 
 
 521.1
Interest61.3
 
 
 61.3
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds
 153.1
 (24.6) 128.5
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE207.6
 
 
 207.6
Other non-operating income(11.2) 
 
 (11.2)
Total expenses2,113.6
 153.1
 (24.6) 2,242.1
Other income       
Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds
 13.1
 
 13.1
Income before provision for income taxes28.2
 26.9
 (9.8) 45.3
Provision for income taxes30.0
 
 
 30.0
Net income (loss)(1.8) 26.9
 (9.8) 15.3
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities23.9
 
 17.1
 41.0
Net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings(25.7) 26.9
 (26.9) (25.7)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings(32.1) 
 
 (32.1)
Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.$6.4
 $26.9
 $(26.9) $6.4


 
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
 Consolidated
Operating
Entities
Consolidated
Funds
EliminationsConsolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues
Fund management fees$1,513.6 $— $(27.6)$1,486.0 
Incentive fees37.0 — — 37.0 
Investment income
Performance allocations1,635.9 — — 1,635.9 
Principal investment loss(546.4)— 5.7 (540.7)
Total investment income1,089.5 — 5.7 1,095.2 
Interest and other income101.6 — (12.0)89.6 
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds— 226.8 — 226.8 
Total revenues2,741.7 226.8 (33.9)2,934.6 
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
Cash-based compensation and benefits849.6 — — 849.6 
Equity-based compensation105.0 — — 105.0 
Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation779.1 — — 779.1 
Total compensation and benefits1,733.7 — — 1,733.7 
General, administrative and other expenses349.3 — — 349.3 
Interest94.0 — — 94.0 
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds— 206.2 (42.7)163.5 
Other non-operating income(7.2)— — (7.2)
Total expenses2,169.8 206.2 (42.7)2,333.3 
Other income (loss)
Net investment losses of Consolidated Funds— (21.3)— (21.3)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes571.9 (0.7)8.8 580.0 
Provision for income taxes197.2 — — 197.2 
Net income (loss)374.7 (0.7)8.8 382.8 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities26.5 — 8.1 34.6 
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc.348.2 (0.7)0.7 348.2 
 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Consolidated
Operating
Entities
 
Consolidated
Funds
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (Dollars in millions)
Revenues       
Fund management fees$1,239.1
 $
 $(153.9) $1,085.2
Performance fees       
Realized1,460.3
 
 (18.4) 1,441.9
Unrealized(602.0) 
 (15.0) (617.0)
Total performance fees858.3
 
 (33.4) 824.9
Investment income (loss)       
Realized(35.4) 
 68.3
 32.9
Unrealized23.3
 
 (41.0) (17.7)
Total investment income (loss)(12.1) 
 27.3
 15.2
Interest and other income22.9
 
 (4.3) 18.6
Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds
 975.5
 
 975.5
Revenue of a real estate VIE86.8
 
 
 86.8
Total revenues2,195.0
 975.5
 (164.3) 3,006.2
Expenses       
Compensation and benefits       
Base compensation632.2
 
 
 632.2
Equity-based compensation378.0
 
 
 378.0
Performance fee related       
Realized650.5
 
 
 650.5
Unrealized(139.6) 
 
 (139.6)
Total compensation and benefits1,521.1
 
 
 1,521.1
General, administrative and other expenses712.8
 
 
 712.8
Interest58.0
 
 
 58.0
Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds
 1,258.8
 (219.5) 1,039.3
Interest and other expenses of a real estate VIE144.6
 
 
 144.6
Other non-operating income(7.4) 
 
 (7.4)
Total expenses2,429.1
 1,258.8
 (219.5) 3,468.4
Other income       
Net investment gains of Consolidated Funds
 886.9
 (22.5) 864.4
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes(234.1) 603.6
 32.7
 402.2
Provision for income taxes2.1
 
 
 2.1
Net income (loss)(236.2) 603.6
 32.7
 400.1
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities(98.4) 
 636.3
 537.9
Net income (loss) attributable to Carlyle Holdings(137.8) 603.6
 (603.6) (137.8)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings(119.4) 
 
 (119.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P.$(18.4) $603.6
 $(603.6) $(18.4)


 




 Year Ended December 31,
 202220212020
 (Dollars in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income$1,248.6 $3,042.5 $374.7 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization147.4 52.0 52.1 
Equity-based compensation154.0 163.1 105.0 
Right-of-use asset impairment, net of broker fees— 24.8 — 
Non-cash performance allocations and incentive fees, net387.5 (1,670.7)(631.8)
Non-cash principal investment income(501.5)(628.9)568.0 
Other non-cash amounts(10.3)29.1 (2.9)
Purchases of investments(737.7)(384.5)(397.4)
Proceeds from the sale of investments498.0 708.3 332.1 
Payments of contingent consideration(5.7)(48.0)— 
Change in deferred taxes, net(73.2)508.4 134.5 
Change in due from affiliates and other receivables(82.3)(25.1)1.2 
Change in deposits and other(11.8)(12.5)(2.0)
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities(14.3)105.7 (4.0)
Change in accrued compensation and benefits(135.4)239.0 210.1 
Change in due to affiliates1.7 0.2 (29.2)
Change in lease right-of-use asset and lease liability(8.8)4.5 (9.8)
Change in deferred revenue4.5 35.1 16.2 
Net cash provided by operating activities860.7 2,143.0 716.8 
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of corporate treasury investments(69.6)— — 
Proceeds from corporate treasury investments50.0 — — 
Purchases of fixed assets, net(40.6)(41.4)(61.2)
Purchase of Abingworth, net of cash acquired(150.2)— — 
Purchase of CBAM intangibles and investments(618.4)— — 
Proceeds from sale of MRE, net of cash sold— 5.9 — 
Proceeds from sale of Brazil management entity, net of cash sold— 3.3 — 
Net cash used in investing activities(828.8)(32.2)(61.2)
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings under credit facilities— 70.0 294.1 
Repayments under credit facilities— (70.0)(329.9)
Issuance of 4.625% subordinated notes due 2061, net of financing costs— 484.1 — 
Repurchase of 3.875% senior notes due 2023— (259.9)— 
Proceeds from CLO borrowings, net of financing costs73.2 111.7 20.5 
Payments on CLO borrowings(16.7)(232.5)(3.8)
Payments of contingent consideration— (0.1)(0.3)
Dividends to common stockholders(443.6)(355.8)(351.3)
Payment of deferred consideration for Carlyle Holdings units(68.8)(68.8)(68.8)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders9.2 19.4 31.0 
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders(78.7)(74.5)(76.8)
Common shares issued for performance allocations38.9 4.8 — 
Common shares repurchased(185.6)(161.8)(26.4)
Change in due to/from affiliates financing activities(456.2)(68.7)0.7 
Net cash used in financing activities(1,128.3)(602.1)(511.0)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes(17.2)(23.2)17.0 
(Decrease) Increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1,113.6)1,485.5 161.6 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period2,475.1 989.6 828.0 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
Supplemental non-cash disclosure
Issuance of common shares related to the acquisition of CBAM and Abingworth$219.5 $— $— 
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,360.7 $2,469.5 $987.6 
Restricted cash0.8 5.6 2.0 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$1,361.5 $2,475.1 $989.6 
236
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (Dollars in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities     
Net income (loss)$995.4
 $(1.8) $(236.2)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment41.3
 72.0
 322.8
Equity-based compensation320.3
 334.6
 378.0
Excess tax benefits related to equity-based compensation
 
 (4.0)
Non-cash performance fees, net(626.8) 199.6
 437.4
Other non-cash amounts(79.8) (55.8) 12.7
Investment (income) loss(222.8) (159.5) 26.7
Purchases of investments(938.6) (458.3) (174.5)
Proceeds from the sale of investments477.6
 325.1
 349.6
Payments of contingent consideration(22.6) (82.6) (17.8)
Change in deferred taxes, net93.4
 (4.4) (31.4)
Change in due from affiliates and other receivables(1.1) (12.4) (1.4)
Change in receivables and inventory of a real estate VIE(14.5) 29.0
 (57.5)
Change in deposits and other(2.0) 6.1
 (9.0)
Change in other assets of a real estate VIE1.6
 41.2
 (17.4)
Deconsolidation of Claren Road (see Note 9)(23.3) 
 
Deconsolidation of Urbplan (see Note 15)14.0
 
 
Deconsolidation of ESG
 (34.5) 
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities50.5
 66.6
 (20.3)
Change in accrued compensation and benefits(13.7) 6.5
 (35.3)
Change in due to affiliates35.7
 (19.3) 21.0
Change in other liabilities of a real estate VIE47.9
 34.3
 101.6
Change in deferred revenue24.4
 18.9
 (50.0)
Net cash provided by operating activities156.9
 305.3
 995.0
Cash flows from investing activities     
Change in restricted cash(15.5) 5.3
 40.8
Purchases of fixed assets, net(34.0) (25.4) (62.3)
Net cash used in investing activities(49.5) (20.1) (21.5)
Cash flows from financing activities     
Borrowings under credit facility250.0
 
 
Repayments under credit facility(250.0) 
 
Proceeds from debt obligations265.6
 20.6
 
Payments on debt obligations(21.7) (9.0) 
Net payments on loans payable of a real estate VIE(14.3) (34.5) (65.3)
Payments of contingent consideration(0.6) (3.3) (8.1)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units, net of offering costs
 
 209.9
Proceeds from issuance of preferred units387.5
 
 
Excess tax benefits related to equity-based compensation
 
 4.0
Distributions to common unitholders(118.1) (140.9) (251.0)
Distributions to preferred unitholders(6.0) 
 
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders in Carlyle Holdings(295.6) (422.6) (848.5)
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders119.2
 113.0
 168.5
Distributions to non-controlling interest holders(100.8) (104.2) (110.8)
Acquisition of non-controlling interests in Carlyle Holdings
 
 (209.9)
Units repurchased(0.2) (58.9) 
Change in due to/from affiliates financing activities(26.4) 53.6
 (62.7)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities188.6
 (586.2) (1,173.9)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes33.2
 (19.6) (50.1)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents329.2
 (320.6) (250.5)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period670.9
 991.5
 1,242.0
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$1,000.1
 $670.9
 $991.5

246







ITEM 9.    CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
 
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our co-principalprincipal executive officersofficer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our co-principalprincipal executive officersofficer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our co-principalprincipal executive officersofficer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to accomplish their objectives at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20172022 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of The Carlyle Group L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Partnership”)the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of its co-principalprincipal executive and principal financial officersofficer and effected by the Partnership’sCompany’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of its consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The Partnership’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of the Partnership’sCompany’s assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the PartnershipCompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Partnership’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172022 based on the framework established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Partnership’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172022 was effective.

247
237







Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Partnership’sCompany’s consolidated financial statements included in this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K and issued its report on the effectiveness of the Partnership’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, which is included herein.
 
ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
None.


ITEM 9C.    DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
238


PART III.
 


ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of theInformation about our directors, andincluding our audit committee, executive officers of our general partner, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C.
NameAgePosition
William E. Conway, Jr.68Founder, Co-Executive Chairman, Co-Chief Investment Officer and Director
Daniel A. D’Aniello71Founder, Chairman Emeritus and Director
David M. Rubenstein68Founder, Co-Executive Chairman and Director
Kewsong Lee52Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director
Glenn A. Youngkin51Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director
Lawton W. Fitt64Director
James H. Hance, Jr.73Operating Executive and Director
Janet Hill70Director
Dr. Thomas S. Robertson75Director
William J. Shaw72Director
Anthony Welters62Director
Curtis L. Buser54Chief Financial Officer
Peter J. Clare52Co-Chief Investment Officer and Director
Jeffrey W. Ferguson52General Counsel
William E. Conway, Jr. Mr. Conway is a founder and Co-Chief Executive Chairman, Co-Chief Investment Officer and director of Carlyle. Mr. Conway was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective July 18, 2011. Previously, Mr. Conway served as our Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Conway also serves on Carlyle's Executive Group. Prior to forming Carlyle in 1987, Mr. Conway was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MCI Communications Corporation (“MCI”). Mr. Conway was a Vice President and Treasurer of MCI from 1981 to 1984. Mr. Conway is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Johns Hopkins Medical Center and the Board of Trustees of the Catholic University of America. He previously served as chairman and/or director of several public and private companies in which Carlyle had significant investment interests. Mr. Conway received his BA from Dartmouth College and his MBA. in finance from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
Daniel A. D’Aniello. Mr. D’Aniello is a founder and Chairman Emeritus of Carlyle and was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective July 18, 2011. Previously, Mr. D'Aniello served as Chairman of Carlyle. Mr. D'Aniello also serves on Carlyle's Executive Group. Prior to forming Carlyle in 1987, Mr. D’Aniello was the Vice President for Finance and Development at Marriott Corporation for eight years. Before joining Marriott, Mr. D’Aniello was a financial officer at PepsiCo, Inc. and Trans World Airlines. Mr. D'Aniello served in the United States Navy from 1969 through 1971 during which time he was a Distinguished Naval Graduate of Officer Candidate School, Newport R.I.; a Supply Officer (LTJG) aboard the USS Wasp (CVS 18); and in 2016, Mr. D'Aniello was awarded the designation of Lone Sailor by the U.S. Navy Memorial Foundation. Mr. D’Aniello is Co-Chairman of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Research; Co-Chairman of the Institute for Veterans and Military Families; Chairman of the Wolf Trap Foundation of the Performing Arts; a member of the U.S.–China CEO and Former Senior Officials’ Dialogue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; an Advisor to the John Templeton Foundation; a founding Trustee of the Lumen Institute; and a Lifetime Member of the Board of Trustees of Syracuse University, a member of the Chancellor’s Council and a member of the Corporate Advisory Council to the Martin J. Whitman School of Management. Mr. D’Aniello previously served as chairman and/or director of several private companies in which

248






Carlyle had significant investment interests. Mr. D’Aniello is a 1968 magna cum laude graduate of Syracuse University, where he was a member of Beta Gamma Sigma, and a 1974 graduate of the Harvard Business School, where he was a Teagle Foundation Fellow.
David M. Rubenstein. Mr. Rubenstein is a founder and Co-Executive Chairman of Carlyle. He was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective July 18, 2011. Previously, Mr. Rubenstein served as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle. Mr. Rubenstein also serves on Carlyle's Executive Group. Prior to forming Carlyle in 1987, Mr. Rubenstein practiced law in Washington, D.C. with Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge LLP (now Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP). From 1977 to 1981 Mr. Rubenstein was Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy. From 1975 to 1976, he served as Chief Counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments. From 1973 to 1975, Mr. Rubenstein practiced law in New York with Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. Among other philanthropic endeavors, Mr. Rubenstein is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Council on Foreign Relations and serves on the Board of Directors or Trustees of Johns Hopkins Medicine, University of Chicago, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts and the Institute for Advanced Study. Mr. Rubenstein serves as Fellow of the Harvard Corporation and as President of the Economic Club of Washington. Mr. Rubenstein is Vice Chairman of the Board of the Brookings Institution, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Business Council, Chairman of the Harvard Global Advisory Council, Chairman of the Madison Council of the Library of Congress, a member of the Board of Dean’s Advisors of the Business School at Harvard, a member of the Advisory Board of the School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University, and Board of the World Economic Forum Global Shapers Community. Mr. Rubenstein is a magna cum laude graduate of Duke University, where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa. Following Duke, Mr. Rubenstein graduated from The University of Chicago Law School.
Kewsong Lee. Mr. Lee is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Mr. Lee was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective January 1, 2018. Mr. Lee currently serves as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle. Mr. Lee is Chairman of Carlyle’s Executive Group. Previously, Mr. Lee served as Deputy CIO for the Partnership’s CPE segment and Head of our Global Credit segment. Prior to joining Carlyle in 2013, Mr. Lee was a partner at Warburg Pincus and a member of the firm’s Executive Management Group. During his 21 years at the firm, he led the Consumer, Industrial and Services group, and was actively involved in the firm’s financial services efforts, capital markets group and the development of the firm’s buyout practice. Mr. Lee serves as President of the Board of the Lincoln Center Theater and serves on Harvard’s Global Advisory Council and the University Campaign Steering Committee. Mr. Lee served as the lead director of Arch Capital Group from 2009 to 2017, and has served on numerous corporate boards including Transdigm, Aramark and Neiman Marcus. He earned his AB in applied mathematics in economics at Harvard College and his MBA from Harvard Business School.
Glenn A. Youngkin. Mr. Youngkin is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Mr. Youngkin was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective January 1, 2018. Mr. Youngkin currently serves as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle. Mr. Youngkin also serves on Carlyle's Executive Group. Previously, Mr. Youngkin served as President and Chief Operating Officer from May 2015 to December 2017. From June 2014 to May 2015, Mr. Youngkin served as Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer. From March 2011 until June 2014, Mr. Youngkin served as Chief Operating Officer. From October 2010 until March 2011, Mr. Youngkin served as Carlyle's interim principal financial officer. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Youngkin was the Global Head of the Industrial Sector investment team. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Youngkin led Carlyle's buyout activities in the United Kingdom and from 1995 to 2000, he was a member of the U.S. buyout team. Prior to joining Carlyle in 1995, Mr. Youngkin was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company and he also previously worked in the investment banking group at CS First Boston. Mr. Youngkin previously served on the Board of Directors of numerous Carlyle portfolio companies. Mr. Youngkin also serves on the Board of Governors of the National Cathedral School, the Dean's Advisory Board at Harvard Business School, the Board of Directors of Meadowkirk, Inc., the Museum of the Bible, the Rice Management Company and as Church Warden for the Vestry of Holy Trinity Church. Mr. Youngkin received a B.S. in mechanical engineering and a BA in managerial studies from Rice University and an MBA from the Harvard Business School, where he was a Baker Scholar.
Lawton W. Fitt. Ms. Fitt is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Ms. Fitt was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective May 2, 2012. Ms. Fitt served as Secretary (CEO) of the Royal Academy of Arts in London from October 2002 to March 2005. Prior to that, Ms. Fitt was an investment banker with Goldman Sachs & Co., where she became a partner in 1994 and a managing director in 1996. She retired from Goldman Sachs in 2002. Ms. Fitt is currently a director of Ciena Corporation (where she serves as chair of the audit committee), Micro Focus International (where she serves on the audit committee and nominating committee) and The Progressive Corporation (where she serves as the lead independent director, and serves on the Executive committee, as chair of the investment and capital committee and on the nominating and governance committee). Ms. Fitt is a former director of ARM Holdings PLC and Thomson Reuters. She is also a trustee or director of several not-for-profit organizations, including the Goldman Sachs Foundation and the Thomson

249






Reuters Foundation. Ms. Fitt received her bachelor's degree from Brown University and her MBA from the Darden School of the University of Virginia.
James H. Hance, Jr. Mr. Hance is an Operating Executive of Carlyle and a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Mr. Hance was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective May 2, 2012. Mr. Hance joined Carlyle in November 2005 and has worked primarily in our Global Credit segment and the financial services sector. Prior to joining Carlyle in 2005, Mr. Hance served as Vice Chairman of Bank of America from 1993 until his retirement on January 31, 2005 and served as Chief Financial Officer from 1988 to 2004. Prior to joining Bank of America, Mr. Hance spent 17 years with Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP). Mr. Hance is currently a director of Acuity Brands Inc. Mr. Hance is a former director of Ford Motor Company, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Morgan Stanley, Duke Energy Corporation, Cousins Properties and Parkway, Inc. Mr. Hance serves as Emeritus Trustee on the Board of Trustees at Washington University in St. Louis and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Johnson & Wales University in Providence, RI. Mr. Hance graduated from Westminster College and received an MBA from Washington University in St. Louis. He is a certified public accountant.
Janet Hill. Ms. Hill is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Ms. Hill was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective May 2, 2012. Ms. Hill serves as Principal at Hill Family Advisors. From 1981 until her retirement in 2010, Ms. Hill served as Vice President of Alexander & Associates, Inc., a corporate consulting firm which she co-owned in Washington, D.C. Ms. Hill is currently a director of Dean Foods Company and Esquire Bank. Ms. Hill is a former director of Wendy’s/Arby’s Group, Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation and The Wendy's Company. She also serves on the Board of Trustees at Duke University, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics, and the Wolf Trap Foundation. Ms. Hill graduated from Wellesley College with a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics and received a Master of Arts in Teaching Mathematics from the Graduate School of the University of Chicago.
Dr. Thomas S. Robertson. Dr. Robertson is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Dr. Robertson was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective May 2, 2012. Dr. Robertson is the Joshua J. Harris Professor of Marketing at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Prior to rejoining Wharton in 2007, Dr. Robertson was special assistant to Emory University’s president on issues of international strategy and a founding director of the Institute for Developing Nations established jointly by Emory University and The Carter Center in fall 2006. From 1998 until 2007, Dr. Robertson was Dean of Emory University’s Goizueta Business School and, from 1994 until 1998, he was the Sainsbury Professor at, and the Chair of Marketing and Deputy Dean of, the London Business School. From 1971 to 1994, Dr. Robertson was a member of the faculty at the Wharton School, and from 2007 to 2014, was the Dean of the Wharton School. He is a former director of CRA International, Inc. and PRGX Global, Inc. Dr. Robertson graduated from Wayne State University and received his M.A. and Ph.D. in marketing from Northwestern University.

William J. Shaw. Mr. Shaw is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Mr. Shaw was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective May 2, 2012. Mr. Shaw was the Vice Chairman of Marriott International, Inc. until his retirement in March 2011. Prior to becoming Vice Chairman of Marriott, Mr. Shaw served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Marriott from 1997 until 2009. Mr. Shaw joined Marriott in 1974 and held various positions, including Corporate Controller, Corporate Vice President, Senior Vice President-Finance, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and President of Marriott Service Group. Prior to joining Marriott, Mr. Shaw worked at Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Shaw is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, a Director of DiamondRock Hospitality (where he serves on the audit committee) and is a former member of the Board of Trustees of three funds in the American Family of mutual funds from 2009 to 2015. Mr. Shaw also serves on the Board of Trustees of the University of Notre Dame and the Board of Trustees of Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. Mr. Shaw graduated from the University of Notre Dame and received an MBA from Washington University in St. Louis.

Anthony Welters. Mr. Welters is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Mr. Welters was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective October 27, 2015. Mr. Welters is Executive Chairman of the Black Ivy Group, LLC. He recently retired as Senior Adviser to the Office of the CEO of UnitedHealth Group having served in such position since April 2014. Prior to this appointment, he was Executive Vice President and a Member of the Office of the CEO of UnitedHealth Group from November 2006 until April 2014. Mr. Welters previously led UHG's Public and Senior Markets Group. Mr. Welters joined UHG in June 2002 upon its acquisition of AmeriChoice, a health care company he founded in 1989. Mr. Welters is currently a director of Loews Corporation, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (where he serves on the Nominating and Governance committee) and C.R. Bard, Inc. (where he is a member of the compensation, regulatory and governance committees). Mr. Welters previously served as a director West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. from 1997 to 2016. He is Trustee Emeritus of the Morehouse School of Medicine Board of Trustees, Chairman of the Board of New York University School of Law, as well as Vice Chairman of the Board of New York University, a Trustee of NYU Langone Medical Center, a trustee of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, where he is Chairman of the finance committee, as well as on the Board of the Horatio Alger Association. Mr. Welters is a founding member of the National Museum of African

250






American History and Culture. Mr. Welters is a graduate of Manhattanville College and received his law degree from New York University School of Law.
Curtis L. Buser.  Mr. Buser is the Chief Financial Officer of Carlyle and has served in such capacity since December 2014.  Mr. Buser also serves on Carlyle’s Executive Group. From May 2014 until December 2014, Mr. Buser served as Carlyle’s Interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Buser joined Carlyle in 2004 as a managing director and served as the firm’s Chief Accounting Officer until May 2014. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Buser was an audit partner with Ernst & Young, LLP.  He began his career with Arthur Andersen in 1985 and was admitted to the partnership in 1997. Mr. Buser graduated from Georgetown University.
Peter J. Clare. Mr. Clare is a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Mr. Clare was elected to the Board of Directors of our general partner effective January 1, 2018. Mr. Clare is the Co-Chief Investment Officer of Carlyle and is Co-Head of the U.S. buyout group. Mr. Clare also serves on Carlyle's Executive Group. Mr. Clare previously served as Deputy CIO of the Partnership’s CPE segment. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Clare was based in Hong Kong and was a founding member of the Carlyle Asia Buyout team and continues to serve on the Carlyle Asia Buyout Investment Committee. In 2001 and 2002, Mr. Clare launched Carlyle’s initial investments in distressed debt, which led to the creation of Carlyle Strategic Partners. From 2004 to 2011, Mr. Clare served as the Global Head of the Aerospace, Defense & Government Services sector team. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Clare was with First City Capital Corporation, a private equity group that invested in buyouts, public equities, distressed bonds and restructurings. Prior to joining First City Capital, he was with the Merchant Banking Group of Prudential-Bache. Mr. Clare is currently a member of the Boards of Directors of Booz Allen Hamilton and Signode Industrial. Mr. Clare has previously served on the boards of CommScope, Inc. and Pharmaceutical Product Development (PPD). Mr. Clare also serves on the Board of Directors of Georgetown University. Mr. Clare is a magna cum laude graduate of Georgetown University and received his MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey W. Ferguson. Mr. Ferguson is the General Counsel of Carlyle and has served in such capacity since 1999. Mr. Ferguson also serves on Carlyle’s Executive Group. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Ferguson was an associate with the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP. Mr. Ferguson received a BA from the University of Virginia, where he was a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He also received his law degree from the University of Virginia, and is admitted to the bars of the District of Columbia and Virginia.
There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of our general partner.
Composition of the Board of Directors
The limited liability company agreement of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. establishes a Board of Directors that is responsible for the oversight of our business and operations. Our common unitholders have no right to elect the directors of our general partner unless, as determined on January 31 of each year, the total voting power held by holders of the special voting units in The Carlyle Group L.P. (including voting units held by our general partner and its affiliates) in their capacity as such, or otherwise held by then-current or former Carlyle personnel (treating voting units deliverable to such persons pursuant to outstanding equity awards as being held by them), collectively, constitutes less than 10% of the voting power of the outstanding voting units of The Carlyle Group L.P. Unless and until the foregoing voting power condition is satisfied, our general partner’s Board of Directors is elected in accordance with its limited liability company agreement, which provides that directors may be appointed and removed by members of our general partner holding a majority in interest of the voting power of the members, which voting power is allocated to each member ratably according to his or her aggregate ownership of our common units and partnership units.
The Carlyle Group L.P. is a limited partnership that is advised by our general partner. As a limited partnership, we are excepted from certain governance rules, which eliminate the requirements that we have a majority of independent directors on our Board of Directors and that we have independent director oversight of executive officer compensation and director nominations. In addition, we are not required to hold annual meetings of our common unitholders.
Director Qualifications
When determining that each of our directors is particularly well-suited to serve on the Board of Directors of our general partner and that each has the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable our Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively, we considered the experience and qualifications of each described above under “— Directors and Executive Officers.”

251






With regard to:
Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello and Rubenstein — We considered that these three individuals are the original founders of our firm, that each has played an integral role in our firm’s successful growth since its founding in 1987, and that each has developed a unique and unparalleled understanding of our business. Finally, we also noted that these three individuals are our largest equity owners and, as a consequence of such alignment of interest with our other equity owners, each has additional motivation to diligently fulfill his oversight responsibilities as a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner.
Mr. Lee — We considered his business acumen, creative ideas and leadership experience in a variety of senior roles at financial institutions.
Mr. Youngkin — We considered his leadership and extensive knowledge of our business and operations gained through his years of service at our firm.
Ms. Fitt — We considered her extensive financial background and experience in a distinguished career at Goldman Sachs in the areas of investment banking and risk analysis, including her unique insights into the operation of global capital markets.
Mr. Hance — We considered his invaluable perspective owing to his experience in various senior leadership roles in the financial services industry, including his role as the Chief Financial Officer of Bank of America Corporation, which included responsibility for financial and accounting matters, as well as his familiarity with our business and operations as an Operating Executive of Carlyle.
Ms. Hill — We considered her insights into the operations of public companies owing to her experience as a consultant, as well as her familiarity with board responsibilities, oversight and control resulting from her significant experience serving on the boards of directors of various public companies.
Dr. Robertson — We considered his distinguished career as a professor and Dean of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and his extensive knowledge and expertise in finance and business administration.
Mr. Shaw — We considered his extensive financial background and public company operating and management experience resulting from his distinguished career in various senior leadership roles at Marriott.
Mr. Welters — We considered his business acumen and entrepreneurial experience, extensive operating expertise as well as his familiarity with board responsibilities, oversight and control resulting from his significant experience serving on the boards of directors of various public companies.
Mr. Clare — We considered his extensive investment and leadership experience as a co-head of our U.S. buyout business and as Co-Deputy CIO of our CPE segment.
Director Independence
Because we are a publicly traded limited partnership, the NASDAQ rules do not require our general partner’s board to be made up of a majority of independent directors. However, our general partner’s board has five directors who satisfy the independence and financial literacy requirements of the NASDAQ and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These directors are Ms. Fitt, Ms. Hill, Dr. Robertson, Mr. Shaw and Mr. Welters. Based on all the relevant facts and circumstances, the Board of Directors determined that the independent directors have no relationship with us or our general partner that would impair their independence as it is defined in the NASDAQ rules and The Carlyle Group L.P. Governance Policy. To assist it in making its independence determinations, the Board of Directors of our general partner adheres to the following standards in determining independence:
Under any circumstances, a director is not independent if:
the director is, or has been within the preceding three years, employed by a Carlyle Entity. A Carlyle Entity means the general partner, us and any parent or subsidiary that the general partner or we control and consolidate into the general partner’s or our financial statements, respectively, filed with the SEC, (but not if the general partner or we reflect such entity solely as an investment in these financial statements);


252






the director, or an immediate family member of that director, accepted any compensation from a Carlyle Entity in excess of $120,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than (i) compensation for director or committee service, (ii) compensation paid to an immediate family member who is an employee (other than an executive officer) of a Carlyle Entity and (iii) benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation;

the director is an immediate family member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by us as an executive officer;

the director is, or has an immediate family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of any organization to which a Carlyle Entity made, or from which a Carlyle Entity received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed five percent (5%) of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than the following:

payments arising solely from investments in a Carlyle Entity’s securities; or

payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs

the director is, or has an immediate family member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of a Carlyle Entity serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

the director is, or has an immediate family member who is, a current partner of a Carlyle Entity’s outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of a Carlyle Entity’s outside auditor who worked on a Carlyle Entity’s audit at any time during any of the past three years.
The following commercial or charitable relationships will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair a director’s independence:
if the director or an immediate family member of that director serves as an executive officer, director or trustee of a charitable organization, and our annual charitable contributions to that organization (excluding contributions by us under any established matching gift program) are less than the greater of $200,000 or five percent (5%) of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues in its most recent fiscal year, provided, however, that in calculating such amount (i) payments arising solely from investments in the Carlyle Entity’s securities and (ii) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs shall be excluded; and

if the director or an immediate family member of that director (or a company for which the director serves as a director or executive officer) invests in or alongside of one or more investment funds or investment companies managed by us or any of our subsidiaries, whether or not fees or other incentive arrangements for us or our subsidiaries are borne by the investing person.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has five standing committees: the audit committee, the conflicts committee, the compensation committee, the executive committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee.
Audit committee. Our audit committee consistswill be in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Messrs. Shaw (Chairman) and Robertson and Ms. Fitt. The purpose ofShareholders, which is expected to be filed no later than 120 days after the audit committee of the Board of Directors of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. is to provide assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations with respect to matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions, including, without limitation, assisting the board of director’s oversight of (1) the quality and integrityend of our financial statements, (2) our compliance with legalfiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2023 Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Corporate Governance,” “Election of Directors” and regulatory requirements, (3) our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit function, and directly appointing, retaining, reviewing and terminating our independent registered public accounting firm. The members of our audit committee meet the independence standards and financial literacy requirements for service on an audit committee of a Board of Directors pursuant to the federal securities laws and NASDAQ Marketplace rules relating to corporate governance matters. The Board of Directors of our general partner has

253






determined that Mr. Shaw is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. The audit committee has a charter which is available on our internet website at http://ir.carlyle.com.
Conflicts committee. The conflicts committee consists of Ms. Fitt and Ms. Hill, Dr. Robertson and Messrs. Shaw and Welters“Executive Officers” and is responsible for reviewing specific matters that our general partner’s Board of Directors believes may involve conflicts of interest. The conflicts committee determines if the resolution of any conflict of interest submitted to it is fair and reasonable to us. Any matters approvedincorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by the conflicts committee are conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us and not a breach by us of any duties we may owe to our common unitholders. In addition, the conflicts committee may review and approve any related person transactions, other than those that are approved pursuant to our related person policy, as described under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions and Director Independence — Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons,” and may establish guidelines or rules to cover specific categories of transactions. The members of the conflicts committee meet the independence standards for service on an audit committee of a Board of Directors pursuant to federal and NASDAQ Global Select Market rules relating to corporate governance matters.reference.

Compensation committee. In December 2017, the Board of Directors formed a compensation committee. Our compensation committee is responsible for, among other duties and responsibilities, reviewing and approving all forms of compensation to be provided to, and employment agreements with, our Co-Chief Executive Officers, establishing and reviewing the overall compensation philosophy of the Partnership, and reviewing, approving, and overseeing the administration of the our Equity Incentive Plan. The members of our compensation committee are Messrs. Welters (Chairman), Conway, D’Aniello and Rubenstein and Ms. Fitt.
Executive committee. The executive committee of the Board of Directors of Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. consists of Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello and Rubenstein. The Board of Directors has generally delegated all of the power and authority of the full Board of Directors to the executive committee to act when the Board of Directors is not in session.

Nominating & Corporate Governance committee. In December 2017, the Board of Directors formed a nominating and corporate governance committee. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among its other duties and responsibilities, identifying candidates qualified to serve on our Board of Directors, reviewing the composition of the Board of Directors and its committees, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles that are applicable to the Partnership, and overseeing the evolution of the Board of Directors. The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Ms. Hill (Chairman), Mr. D’Aniello, Ms. Fitt and Mr. Hance.
Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals
We have a Code of Conduct and a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, which apply to our principal executive officers,officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Each of these codes is available on our website at http://ir.carlyle.com. We intend to disclose any amendment to or waiver of the Code of Conduct and any waiver of our Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals on behalf of an executive officer or director either on our website or in a Form 8-K filing.

Governance PolicyITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors ofInformation relating to our general partner has a governance policy, which addresses matters such as the Board of Directors’ responsibilitiesexecutive officer and dutiesdirector compensation and the Board of Directors’ composition and compensation. The governance policy is available on our website at http://ir.carlyle.com.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the executive officers and directors of our general partner, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Partnership’s equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC and to furnish the Partnership with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us or written representations from such persons that they were not required to file a Form 5 to report previously unreported ownership or changes in ownership, we believe that, with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, such persons complied with all such filing requirements.


254






ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Philosophy
Our business as an alternative asset management firm is dependent on the services of our named executive officers and other key employees. Among other things, we rely on our executive officers to set the strategy for our business and to allocate resources to manage our complex global operations.  In addition, we depend on our personnel's ability to find, select and execute investments, oversee and improve portfolio company operations to create value for our investors, find and develop relationships with fund investors and other sources of capital and provide other services that are essential to our success by supporting our investment teams, LP relations group and the corporate infrastructure of our firm.  Therefore, it is important that our named executive officers and other key employees are compensated in a manner that motivates them to excel and encourages them to remain with our firm.
Our compensation policy has several primary objectives: (1) establish a clear relationship between performance and compensation, (2) align short-term and long-term incentives with our fund investors and common unitholders, and (3) provide competitive incentive opportunities, with an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term incentives that induce our named executive officers and other key employees to work to achieve the firm's goals and design and execute its strategic plan. We believe that the key to achieving these objectives is an organized, unbiased approach that is well understood, responsive to changes in the industry and the general labor market and, above all, flexible and timely.
Our senior Carlyle professionals (including our named executive officers) and other key employees invest a significant amount of their own capital in or alongside the funds we advise. In addition, certain of these individuals may be allocated a portion of the carried interest or incentive fees payable in respect of our investment funds. We believe that this approach of seeking to align the interests of our named executive officers and other key employees with those of the investors in our funds has been a key contributor to our strong performance and growth. We also believe that significant equity ownership by our named executive officers and other key employees results in the alignment of their interests with those of our common unitholders.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, our founders, Daniel A. D’Aniello, William E. Conway, Jr. and David M. Rubenstein, served as our co-principal executive officers. We refer to our co-principal executive officers during 2017, together with Glenn A. Youngkin, who served as President and Chief Operating Officer during 2017, Curtis L. Buser, our Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer, and Jeffrey W. Ferguson, our General Counsel, as our “named executive officers.”
Appointment of New Co-Chief Executive Officers and Directors

In 2017, our Board of Directors undertook a project to identify a new CEO or CEOs and to determine the employment and compensation arrangements for such individual or individuals.  Our founders, together with a subcommittee of the Board comprised of Lawton Fitt, Tony Welters and Janet Hill, lead a search process to identify possible internal and external candidates.  The Board of Directors retained Russell Reynolds to assist in the evaluation and assessment of the skills and characteristics of possible internal CEO candidates and other members of the executive management team. The Board subcommittee met on numerous occasions to discuss the candidates, possible leadership structures and future roles, including the future roles of our founders, both with Russell Reynolds and among themselves. They also met frequently with the founders and reported to the full Board of Directors.  Once Messrs. Lee and Youngkin were identified, these directors and our founders held further meetings to discuss the new Co-CEO employment and compensation arrangements.  The Board of Directors engaged Korn Ferry Hay Group as its compensation consultant to assist with the determination of the new arrangements for the Co-CEOs.  Korn Ferry Hay Group provided market compensation data in order to provide a general understanding of current compensation practices, information on best practices and trends and modeling of various alternative compensation structures to our Board of Directors. They also worked closely with the Board of Directors on determining an appropriate selection of metrics to be used in measuring performance under the new incentive plan arrangements.

Effective January 1, 2018, Kewsong Lee and Glenn Youngkin were appointed as our new Co-Chief Executive Officers and also became members of our Board of Directors. In connection with their appointments, effective January 1, 2018, Messrs. Conway and Rubenstein transitioned from their prior roles as Co-Chief Executive Officers and became Co-Executive Chairmen of our Board and Mr. D’Aniello became Chairman Emeritus of our Board. Each of Messrs. Conway, D'Aniello and Rubenstein continue to serve as members of our Executive Group.

255







Effective on January 1, 2018, in connection with their respective new appointments, our Board of Directors approved new compensation arrangements for Messrs. Lee and Youngkin and, on October 23, 2017, we entered into new employment agreements with each of Messrs. Lee and Youngkin related to their service as our Co-Chief Executive Officers. The compensation arrangements for the Co-CEOs were designed to further align their interests with our investors.

The employment agreements each provide for a five-year term commencing on January 1, 2018 and continuing until December 31, 2022 or until such employment agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with its terms (the “Term”). Under the employment agreements, each Co-CEO will receive a base salary of $275,000, which may be increased from time to time by our Board of Directors. In addition, during the Term, each Co-CEO will be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus equal to the distributions per common unit of the Partnership paid with respect to the applicable calendar year multiplied by 2,500,000 (subject to equitable adjustment by our Board of Directors in order to account for distributions, splits, reorganizations, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations, spin-offs, combinations, exchanges or other similar events; and, following a Change of Control (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Partnership, dated as of September 13, 2017), the parties must negotiate and agree to an adjustment such that after the Change of Control the bonus opportunity is no less favorable to the Co-CEO than prior to the Change of Control). The employment agreements also provided for the payment by us of legal fees incurred by the Co-CEOs in connection with the negotiation of the employment agreements. The employment agreements also contain specified severance provisions and restrictive covenants that are described below in the section entitled “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement and as approved by the Co-CEO Award Committee of our Board of Directors in February 2018, each of our Co-Chief Executive Officers also received a one-time grant of time-vesting deferred restricted common units (“DRUs”) with respect to 1,250,000 common units of the Partnership and a one-time performance-vesting DRU award with respect to a target of 1,250,000 common units of the Partnership, in each case under The Carlyle Group L.P. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”). The time-vesting DRUs were granted on February 1, 2018 and the performance-vesting DRUs were granted on February 6, 2018. The time-vesting DRUs generally will vest in equal installments over five years, subject to the continued employment of the Co-CEO. The performance-vesting DRUs generally will vest and settle annually in five equal target installments, subject to the continued employment of the Co-CEO, with the opportunity to earn between 0% and 200% of the target amount of the performance-vesting DRUs based on the level of achievement of specified performance metrics that will be set by our Board of Directors at the beginning of each performance year. For the fiscal 2018 performance year, the first installment of the performance-vesting DRUs will vest and settle at the end of the one-year performance period based on the Partnership’s level of achievement against the Fee Related Earnings, Distributable Earnings and Fee-Earning Assets Under Management Raised targets established by our of Board of Directors. Of the total target number of performance DRUs awarded for the fiscal 2018 performance year, 75% will vest subject to achievement against the Fee Related Earnings target, 15% will vest subject to achievement against the Distributable Earnings target and 10% will vest subject to achievement against Fee-Earning Assets Under Management Raised ("FEAUM Raised") target. Fee Related Earnings is described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Key Financial Measures-Non-GAAP Financial Measures-Fee Related Earnings.” Distributable Earnings is described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Key Financial Measures-Non-GAAP Financial Measures-Distributable Earnings.” FEAUM Raised represents fee earning capital raised from limited partners and excludes capital commitments made by the firm or through our internal coinvestment program. Any performance-vesting DRUs earned will vest upon certification by our Board of Directors of the performance of the Partnership against the applicable target performance metrics for the prior year. When assessing performance against the applicable prior year target performance metrics, our Board of Directors reserves the ability to adjust the actual fiscal year results to exclude the effects of extraordinary, unusual or infrequently occurring events. Following a Change of Control, the parties must agree on performance measures that provide for a threshold, target and maximum opportunity that is substantially similar to the opportunity in place prior to the Change of Control. See “—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below for a description of the potential vesting that each of the Co-Chief Executive Officers may be entitled to in connection with a Change in Control or certain terminations of employment.

Compensation Committee

Executive compensation decisions for 2017 and prior years were made by our founders. In December 2017, in connection with the appointment of our new Co-Chief Executive Officers, we formed a compensation committee that will assume responsibility for approving all forms of compensation to be provided to, and employment agreements with, our Co-Chief Executive Officers, establishing and reviewing our general compensation philosophy, and reviewing, approving and overseeing the administration of our Equity Incentive Plan. Our Co-Chief Executive Officers will review and approve, or recommend to the compensation committee, compensation for our other executive officers.

256






Compensation Elements
The primary elements of our compensation program for our named executive officers are base salary, annual cash bonuses and long-term incentives, including the ownership of Carlyle Holdings partnership units, DRUs and, for certain of our named executive officers, carried interest, equity pool or key executive incentive plan ("KEIP") interests. We believe that the elements of compensation for our named executive officers serve the primary objectives of our compensation program. We periodically review the compensation of our key employees, including our named executive officers, and, from time to time, we may implement new plans or programs or otherwise make changes to the compensation structure relating to current or future key employees, including our named executive officers. In 2017, compensation decisions and decisions regarding the allocation of carried interest and KEIP interests to our named executive officers, senior Carlyle professionals and other employees were made by our founders and other senior Carlyle professionals and not by our independent directors.
Base Salary. For 2017, each of our named executive officers was paid an annual salary of $275,000. We believe that the base salary of our named executive officers typically should not be the most significant component of total compensation. Our founders determined that this amount was a sufficient minimum base salary for our named executive officers and decided that it should be the same for all named executive officers.
Annual Discretionary Bonuses. For 2017, our named executive officers were awarded bonuses, with the exception of our founders. The aggregate amounts of the bonuses were $1,500,000 for Mr. Youngkin, $1,500,000 for Mr. Buser and $1,500,000 for Mr. Ferguson. We paid 90% of each named executive officer's bonus in cash in December 2017 and paid the balance by granting an amount of DRUs that was equal to the remaining 10% of the total bonus amount in February 2018. The DRUs granted as part of the discretionary bonus for services provided in 2017 for the remaining 10% of the total bonus amount vest on August 1, 2019, 18 months after the grant date of February 1, 2018. These DRUs will be included in the Summary Compensation Table in our Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2018.
The discretionary bonuses for each of our named executive officers were recommended by Mr. D’Aniello and were approved by all three of our founders. The specific factors considered in determining the discretionary bonuses for Messrs. Youngkin, Buser and Ferguson are discussed below. Our founders determined that they would not accept an annual bonus for 2017 in order to further align their interests with our unitholders.
The subjective factors that contributed to the determination of the bonus amounts included an assessment of the performance of Carlyle and the investments of the funds that we advise, the individual performance and contributions of the named executive officer to our business during 2017, the named executive officer’s potential to enhance investment returns and contribute to the long-term value of our common units and the named executive officer's tenure at his level. An overview of the main factors that were considered in determining the annual cash bonuses for 2017 include:
Achieving strong investment fund performance to create value for our investors;
Strategically expanding the firm's product offerings for our fund investors;
Raising approximately $43 billion in new commitments across our platform during 2017;
Managing our business through a continuing period of intense regulatory scrutiny of our industry;
Resolving certain historical legacy liabilities;
Continuing to enhance and grow our Global Credit business and develop additional ancillary Global Credit investment products;
Driving and overseeing the development of new or improved processes to further enhance the capabilities of our our investor services teams;
Maintaining disciplined cost control management and accountability for meeting or exceeding our firm operating budget.
Each of our named executive officers provided critical and significant contributions to Carlyle’s achievements in 2017. In assessing Mr. Youngkin’s performance and individual contribution, we considered his overall leadership role, including in evaluating new products and business strategies and in investor outreach, and his operational oversight of our business on a global basis. In assessing Mr. Buser’s performance, we considered his oversight of our accounting, finance and treasury functions and his leadership role in managing our preferred unit offering that closed in September 2017, driving and overseeing the development of new or improved processes to further enhance the capabilities of our investor services teams and maintaining disciplined cost control management and accountability for meeting or exceeding our firm operating budget across our global business. In assessing Mr. Ferguson’s performance, we considered his oversight of our global legal and compliance

257






team, his role in managing our litigation and his efforts to address legal and regulatory considerations applicable to our investment advisory business and to our firm as a public company, including his role in the successful resolution of certain historical legacy liabilities.
Carried Interest and Incentive Fees. The general partners of our carry funds typically receive a special residual allocation of income, which we refer to as a carried interest, from our investment funds if investors in such funds achieve a specified threshold return. Similarly, the collateral managers of our structured credit funds are entitled to receive incentive fees from our credit funds if investors in such funds achieve a specified threshold return. While the Carlyle Holdings partnerships own controlling equity interests in these collateral managers and fund general partners, our senior Carlyle professionals and other personnel who work in these operations directly own a portion of the carried interest in these entities or are allocated a portion of the incentive fees, in order to better align their interests with our own and with those of the investors in these funds. We generally seek to concentrate the direct ownership of carried interest in respect of each carry fund and the incentive fees in our structured credit funds among those of our professionals who directly work with that fund so as to align their interests with those of our fund investors and of our firm. Our founders and Mr. Buser do not currently receive allocations of direct carried interest ownership or incentive fees at the fund level. Mr. Youngkin and Mr. Ferguson previously received allocations of direct carried interest ownership at the fund level in respect of certain corporate private equity funds, but neither continues to receive such allocations for subsequent funds.
Carried interest, if any, in respect of any particular investment, is only paid in cash when the underlying investment is realized. To the extent any “giveback” obligation is triggered, carried interest previously distributed by the fund would need to be returned to such fund. Our professionals who receive direct allocations of carried interest at the fund level are personally subject to the “giveback” obligation, pursuant to which they may be required to repay carried interest previously distributed to them, thereby reducing the amount of cash received by such recipients for any such year. There is no "giveback" obligation with respect to incentive fees. Because the amount of carried interest and incentive fees payable is directly tied to the realized performance of the underlying investments, we believe this fosters a strong alignment of interests among the investors in those funds and the professionals who are allocated direct carried interest, which also indirectly benefits our unitholders.
The percentage of carried interest owned at the fund level by individual professionals varies by year, by investment fund and, with respect to each carry fund, by investment. Ownership of carried interest by senior Carlyle professionals and other personnel at the fund level getting carry is also subject to a range of vesting schedules. Vesting is tied to continued employment over specified periods of time, which fosters employment retention and enhances the alignment of interests between our professionals who receive carried interest allocations, the firm and our fund investors.
Equity Pool Program. Prior to our initial public offering in 2012, we facilitated employees sharing in the future potential value of all our investment activities through our equity pool program, which gave participants equity pool units that represented an economic stake in all the investments made in that calendar year. The last equity pool was formed in 2011, prior to our IPO. The equity pool was structured so that in a given year, the equity pool receives a portion of any carried interest proceeds Carlyle earns from all investments made during the respective calendar year. On a semi-annual basis, participants receive cash distributions equivalent to the equity pool unit value times their number of equity pool units. We anticipate that distributions from the equity pools will decline over the next few years as we exit investments in the respective equity pools. Of our named executive officers, only Mr. Youngkin, Mr. Buser and Mr. Ferguson previously received equity pool units and only Messrs. Buser and Ferguson received equity pool distributions in 2017.
Key Executive Incentive Program (KEIP). In March 2014, we adopted a new methodology for determining potential future grants to certain key executives of DRUs and/or common units of the Partnership under the Equity Incentive Plan. The KEIP is intended to be an incentive to participants to align their economic interests with those of our fund investors and our common unitholders, as well as with Carlyle’s overall performance. Under the terms of the KEIP, for each applicable calendar year commencing with 2014, when we began the program, we calculate the number of DRUs to be issued to the participating executives based on the carried interest generated by the investment pool composed of the portfolio investments acquired during the calendar year by any of our carry funds. On a semi-annual basis, based on the amount of carried interest distributed during that period (less any funds escrowed to secure giveback obligations during that period) in the investment pool and the participating executive’s participation percentage, we calculate a number of DRUs to be granted to such executive for that period by reference to that executive’s interest in the investment pool for that period divided by the fair market value of our common units on the relevant grant date. The grant of such DRUs is anticipated to be made on November 1 of each year for carry distributed during the first and second quarters of the calendar year and on May 1 of the following year for carry distributed during the third and fourth quarters of the calendar year, subject in each case to a minimum grant threshold value of $100,000 for each six-month period. Each DRU grant will vest six months from the grant date.

258






Mr. Youngkin received participation percentages in the KEIP for 2014, 2015 and 2016. From time to time, additional key executives may be eligible to participate in the KEIP at our discretion. We did not allocate any participation percentages in the KEIP for 2017. On May 1, 2017, we granted Mr. Youngkin 6,470 DRUs, which represented his accrued but unpaid KEIP distributions in the 2014, 2015 and 2016 KEIP as of December 31, 2016. These DRUs vested on November 1, 2017. We anticipate that in May 2018, Mr. Youngkin will be granted DRUs with a value equivalent to $120,646, which represents his accrued but unpaid KEIP distributions in the 2014, 2015 and 2016 KEIP as of December 31, 2017.

Other Equity Grants.
Carlyle Holdings Partnership Units. At the time of the initial public offering, our pre-IPO owners contributed to the Carlyle Holdings partnerships equity interests in our business in exchange for partnership units of Carlyle Holdings. All of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units received by our founders as part of the reorganization were fully vested upon receipt. A portion of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units received by employees other than our founders in exchange for their contribution of interests in the Parent Entities and other interests are subject to vesting, as are certain additional Carlyle Holdings partnership units we have issued subsequent to our IPO in connection with certain acquisitions. As of December 31, 2017, of the portion of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units that are subject to vesting, only one tranche, representing one sixth of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units subject to vesting, remains unvested and will vest on May 2, 2018.
Bonus Holdback DRU Grants. As part of the annual bonuses awarded to our named executive officers (other than the founders, who do not receive bonuses), we paid a portion of such bonuses in Bonus Holdback DRUs. On February 1, 2017, Messrs. Buser, Youngkin and Ferguson each were granted 7,559, 8,721 and 7,559 Bonus Holdback DRUs, respectively. These Bonus Holdback DRUs represented 10% of the total bonus amount awarded to each respective named executive officer for services provided in 2016. These Bonus Holdback DRUs will vest on August 1, 2018, 18 months after the grant date. These Bonus Holdback DRUs are reflected as stock awards for 2017 in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017 table.
On February 1, 2018, Messrs. Buser, Youngkin and Ferguson each were granted 5,803 Bonus Holdback DRUs. These Bonus Holdback DRUs represented 10% of the total bonus amount awarded to each respective named executive officer for services provided in 2017. These Bonus Holdback DRUs will be reflected as stock awards for 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018 table in our Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2018. Because the value of these Bonus Holdback DRUs is directly tied to the performance of the Partnership, we believe this fosters a strong alignment of interests between our named executive officers and our unitholders.
Annual Discretionary DRU Grants. As part of our year-end compensation program, on February 1, 2017, we awarded discretionary DRU grants to Messrs. Buser and Ferguson, based on their 2016 performance, leadership, overall responsibilities and expected future contribution to the firm’s success. The size of each DRU grant was approved by our Equity Plan Administrator, which for 2016 was comprised of our three founders. On February 1, 2017, Mr. Buser received a grant of 174,194 DRUs and Mr. Ferguson received a grant of 96,775 DRUs. These DRU grants vest 40% on August 1, 2018, 30% on August 1, 2019 and 30% on August 1, 2020. These DRUs are reflected as stock awards for 2017 in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017 table.
As part of our year-end compensation program, on February 1, 2018, we awarded discretionary DRU grants to Messrs. Youngkin, Buser and Ferguson based on their 2017 performance, leadership, overall responsibilities and expected future contribution to the firm's success. The size of each grant was approved by our Equity Plan Administrator, which for 2017 was comprised of our three founders.
Time-Vested DRU Grants. On February 1, 2018, Mr. Youngkin received a grant of 100,000 time-vesting DRUs, Mr. Buser received a grant of 113,379 time-vesting DRUs and Mr. Ferguson received a grant of 68,028 time-vesting DRUs. These time-vesting DRU grants vest 40% on August 1, 2019, 30% on August 1, 2020 and 30% on August 1, 2021. Mr. Youngkin received this grant due to his overall leadership role, including in evaluating new products and business strategies and in investor outreach, and his operational oversight of our business on a global basis. Mr. Buser received this grant due to his strong performance during 2017 as our Chief Financial Officer, including his oversight of our accounting, finance and treasury functions and his leadership role in managing our preferred unit offering that closed in September 2017, driving and overseeing the development of new or improved processes to further enhance the capabilities of our investor services teams and maintaining disciplined cost control management and accountability for meeting or exceeding our firm operating budget across our global business. Mr. Ferguson received this grant due to his oversight of our global legal and compliance team, his role in managing our litigation and his efforts to address legal and regulatory considerations applicable to our

259






investment advisory business and to our firm as a public company, including his role in the successful resolution of certain historical legacy liabilities. These DRUs will be reflected as stock awards for 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018 table in our Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2018.
Performance DRU Grants. On February 6, 2018, Mr. Buser received a performance-vesting DRU award with respect to a target of 45,352 performance-vesting DRUs. Mr. Buser will have the opportunity to earn between 0% and 200% of the target amount of performance-vesting DRUs based on the level of achievement against the performance targets, subject to Mr. Buser's continued employment by the Partnership. Mr. Buser's performance-vesting DRUs will vest subject to the Partnership's achievement of the same performance targets and weighting as is applicable to our Co-CEOs which are described above under "—Appointment of New Co-Chief Executive Officers and Directors." Mr. Buser received this DRU grant due to his strong performance during 2017 as our Chief Financial Officer, including his oversight of our accounting, finance and treasury functions and his leadership role in managing our preferred unit offering that closed in September 2017, driving and overseeing the development of new or improved processes to further enhance the capabilities of our investor services teams and maintaining disciplined cost control management and accountability for meeting or exceeding our firm operating budget across our global business. These DRUs will be reflected as stock awards for 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018 table in our Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2018.
Our founders do not receive DRU awards.
Compensation Committee Report
In December 2017, we formed a compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The compensation committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on such review and discussion, has determined that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis shouldwill be included in this annual report.
Anthony Welters (Chairman)
William E. Conway, Jr.
Daniel A. D'Aniello
David M. Rubenstein
Lawton W. Fitt

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Executive compensation decisions for 2017 and prior years were made by our founders. In December 2017, our Board of Directors formed a compensation committee consisting of Messrs. Welters (Chairman), Conway, D'Aniello and Rubenstein and Ms. Fitt. Our founders served as co-principal executive officers during 2017 and continue to serve as executive officers of the Partnership following the appointments of Messrs. Youngkin and Lee as our new Co-Chief Executive Officers. For a description of certain transactions between us and the members of our compensation committee, see “Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence.”

260






Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents summary information concerning compensation of our named executive officers during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. For our named executive officers who own direct carried interest allocations or allocations of incentive fees at the fund level or who participate in the equity pool program, we have reported in the "All Other Compensation" column amounts that reflect the actual cash distributions received by our named executive officers in respect of such allocations during the relevant year. The Principal Positions referenced below are as of January 1, 2018.
Name and Principal PositionYear Salary ($) 
Cash Bonus
($)(1)
 
Stock Awards
($)(2)
 
All Other
Compensation
($)
 
Total
($)
William E. Conway, Jr.2017 275,000 
 
 6,750
(3)281,750
Founder, Co-Executive Chairman and Co-Chief Investment Officer2016 275,000 
 
 6,625
(3)281,625
(co-principal executive officer)2015 275,000  
 
  6,625
(3)281,625
Daniel A. D'Aniello2017 275,000 
   6,750
(4)281,750
Founder and Chairman Emeritus2016 275,000 
   6,625
(3)281,625
(co-principal executive officer)2015 275,000  
 
  6,625
(3)281,625
David M. Rubenstein2017 275,000 
 
 6,750
(3)281,750
Founder and Co-Executive Chairman2016 275,000 
 
 6,625
(3)281,625
(co-principal executive officer)2015 275,000  
 
  6,625
(3)281,625
Curtis L. Buser2017 275,000 1,350,000
 2,510,672
 132,800
(4)4,268,472
Chief Financial Officer2016 275,000 1,170,000
 987,741
 132,892
(4)2,565,633
(principal financial officer)2015 275,000  1,350,000
 992,522
  247,476
(4)2,864,998
Glenn A. Youngkin2017 275,000 1,350,000
 246,094
 3,704,275
(5)5,575,369
Co-Chief Executive Officer2016 275,000 1,350,000
 196,927
 3,389,484
(5)5,211,411
 2015 275,000 2,025,000
 2,077,513
 1,360,033
(5)5,737,546
Jeffrey W. Ferguson2017 275,000  1,350,000
 1,445,387
  8,880
(6)3,079,267
General Counsel2016 275,000  1,170,000
 122,533
  213,395
(6)1,780,928
 2015 275,000 1,260,000
 1,029,524
 621,690
(6)3,186,214
(1)
For each year shown, the amount shown represents the cash portion of the year-end bonus paid in December of that year, but excludes the portion paid in Bonus Holdback DRUs in February of the following year. As part of the discretionary bonuses for services provided in 2017, 2016 and 2015, each of our named executive officers (other than our founders) received 10% of his bonus in a grant of DRUs.
(2)This amount represents the grant-date fair value of DRUs granted in for the year shown, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP pertaining to equity-based compensation. For additional information regarding the determination of grant-date fair value see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Amounts reported for 2017 reflect the portion of the 2016 year-end bonus paid in Bonus Holdback DRU awards, which were granted to Messrs. Buser, Youngkin and Ferguson on February 1, 2017. The grant-date fair value of the Bonus Holdback DRU awards is computed in accordance with GAAP and differs from the dollar amount of the portion of the 2016 year-end bonus that was held back. Amounts reported also reflect a DRU award granted to Mr. Youngkin on May 1, 2017 with respect to his accrued KEIP distributions through December 31, 2016 and the annual discretionary DRU awards that were granted to Messrs. Buser and Ferguson on February 1, 2017.
(3)This amount represents our 401(k) matching contributions.
(4)This amount represents cash distributions of $126,050, $126,267 and $240,851 received by Mr. Buser in respect of his equity pool interest for 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively, and also includes $6,750, $6,625, and $6,625 in 401(k) matching contributions for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(5)This amount represents actual cash distributions received by Mr. Youngkin in respect of direct carried interest allocations at the fund level of $3,697,525, $3,382,859 and $1,353,408 for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively; and also includes $6,750, $6,625 and $6,625 in 401(k) matching contributions for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(6)This amount represents actual cash distributions received by Mr. Ferguson in respect of direct carried interest allocations at the fund level of $0, $206,770 and $615,065 for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This amount also includes $6,750, $6,625 and $6,625 in 401(k) matching contributions for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $2,130 received by Mr. Ferguson in respect of his equity pool interest for 2017.


261






Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017
The number of DRUs shown2023 Proxy Statement under the column heading “All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units” in the table below represents the aggregate number of unvested DRUs that were granted to the relevant named executive officers in 2017. The dollar amounts shown under the column heading “Grant Date Fair Value of Stockcaption “Compensation Matters” and Option Awards” in the table below were calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For additional information regarding the determination of grant date fair value, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements includedis incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K by reference.
   
Stock Awards(1)
Name
Grant
Date
 
All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock
or Units (#)
   
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
William E. Conway, Jr.
 
   $
Daniel A. D’Aniello
 
   $
David M. Rubenstein
 
   $
Curtis L. Buser2/1/2017
 174,194
 (2) $2,396,909
 2/1/2017
 7,559
 (3) $113,763
Glenn A. Youngkin2/1/2017
 8,721
 (3) $131,251
 5/1/2017
 6,470
 (4) $114,843
Jeffrey W. Ferguson2/1/2017
 96,775
 (2) $1,331,624
 2/1/2017
 7,559
 (3) $113,763
(1)The references to “stock,” “shares” or “units” in this table refer to DRUs.
(2)Represents discretionary DRU grants awarded to Messrs. Buser and Ferguson. These DRU grants will vest 40% on August 1, 2018; 30% on August 1, 2019; and 30% on August 1, 2020.
(3)Represents Bonus Holdback DRUs awarded to Messrs. Buser, Youngkin and Ferguson, all of which will vest on August 1, 2018.
(4)Represents a DRU grant with respect to Mr. Youngkin's accrued KEIP distributions through December 31, 2016. These DRUs vested on November 1, 2017.
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017
Terms of Carlyle Holdings Partnership Units
Our pre-IPO owners, including certain of our named executive officers, received Carlyle Holdings partnership units in the reorganization in exchange for the contribution of their equity interests in the former Parent Entities and a portion of the equity interests they owned in certain of our operating subsidiaries. Each holder of our Carlyle Holdings partnership units who is employed by us will generally be required to hold at least 25% of such units until one year following the termination of active service with us. A holder who is our employee generally will forfeit all unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units once he or she is no longer providing services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon the death or permanent disability of a holder of all of his or her unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units held at that time will vest immediately. In addition, all vested and unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by a holder who is employed by us will be immediately forfeited in the event his or her service is terminated for cause, or if such person materially breaches the non-solicitation provisions of the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnership agreements.
Transfer Restrictions. As of May 2, 2017, the fifth anniversary of our initial public filing, employee holders of our Carlyle Holdings partnership units, including our founders and our other senior Carlyle professionals, are permitted to transfer or exchange any such units without our consent. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Exchange Agreement."
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
In connection with our initial public offering, the firm adopted the Equity Incentive Plan, which is a source of new equity-based awards and permits us to grant to our senior Carlyle professionals, employees, directors of our general partner and consultants non-qualified options, unit appreciation rights, common units, restricted common units, DRUs, phantom restricted common units and other awards based on our common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units. Unvested DRUs granted

262






to our named executive officers under the Equity Incentive Plan generally will be forfeited upon termination of employment. For a description of the potential vesting that the named executive officers may be entitled to with respect to their DRUs in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan) or certain terminations of employment see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below. In addition, all vested and unvested DRUs will be immediately forfeited in the event the holder is terminated for cause, or if such person materially breaches any applicable restrictive covenant. For more information regarding the DRUs granted to our named executive officers under the Equity Incentive Plan, including the vesting criteria, see the sections entitled “Key Executive Incentive Program (KEIP)” and “Other Equity Awards” above.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal-Year End
The following table provides information regarding outstanding unvested equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017. Some of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units received by certain of our named executive officers as a part of the reorganization we effected prior to our initial public offering are subject to vesting; however, all of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units received by our founders as part of the reorganization were fully vested at issuance. The dollar amounts shown under the column heading “Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” in the table below were calculated by multiplying the number of unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units and unvested DRUs held by the named executive officer by the closing market price of $22.90 per Carlyle common unit on December 29, 2017, the last trading day of 2017.
 
Stock Awards(1)
 
Number of Shares or Units
of Stock That Have Not
Vested (#)
 
Market Value of Shares or
Units of Stock That Have Not
Vested ($)
William E. Conway, Jr.  
Daniel A. D’Aniello
 
David M. Rubenstein
 
Curtis L. Buser (2)316,864
 $7,256,186
Glenn A. Youngkin (3)724,824
 $16,598,470
Jeffrey W. Ferguson (4)216,055
 $4,947,660
(1)The references to “stock,” “shares” or “units” in this table refer to Carlyle Holdings partnership units and DRUs.
(2)Mr. Buser's 316,864 units are composed of 32,588 unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units, all of which will vest on May 2, 2018; 276,717 discretionary DRUs of which 105,097 will vest on August 1, 2018, 119,362 will vest on August 1, 2019, 52,258 will vest on August 1, 2020; and 7,559 Bonus Holdback DRUs, all of which will vest on August 1, 2018.
(3)Mr. Youngkin’s 724,824 units are composed of 650,199 unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units, all of which will vest on May 2, 2018; 65,904 discretionary DRUs of which 22,813 will vest on August 1, 2018 and 43,091 will vest on August 1, 2019; and 8,721 Bonus Holdback DRUs, all of which will vest on August 1, 2018.
(4)Mr. Ferguson's 216,055 units are composed of 85,951 unvested Carlyle Holdings partnership units, all of which will vest on May 2, 2018; 122,545 discretionary DRUs, of which 50,116 will vest on August 1, 2018; 43,397 will vest on August 1, 2019; and 29,032 will vest on August 1, 2020; and 7,559 Bonus Holdback DRUs, all of which will vest on August 1, 2018.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2017
As we have never issued any options, our named executive officers had no option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2017. Some of our named executive officers had equity awards vest during the year ended December 31, 2017.
 
Stock Awards(1)
 Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) Value Realized on Vesting ($) (5)
William E. Conway, Jr.
 
Daniel A. D’Aniello
 
David M. Rubenstein
 
Curtis L. Buser (2)91,533
 $1,787,193
Glenn A. Youngkin (3)739,393
 $13,168,833
Jeffrey W. Ferguson (4)122,186
 $2,245,612
(1)The references to “stock”, “shares” or “units” in this table refer to Carlyle Holdings partnership units and Carlyle common units.

263






(2)The value for Mr. Buser is based on the value of 32,588 Carlyle Holdings partnership units that vested on May 2, 2017 and 58,945 common units received upon the vesting of DRUs on August 1, 2017.
(3)The value for Mr. Youngkin is based on the value of 650,200 Carlyle Holdings partnership units that vested on May 2, 2017 and 82,723 common units received upon the vesting of DRUs on August 1, 2017 and 6,470 common units received upon vesting of DRUs on November 1, 2017.
(4)The value for Mr. Ferguson is based on the value of 85,951 Carlyle Holdings partnership units that vested on May 2, 2017 and 36,235 common units received upon the vesting of DRUs on August 1, 2017.
(5)For both Carlyle Holdings partnership units and common units, the value realized on vesting was calculated by multiplying the number of Carlyle Holdings partnership units and the number of common units received upon vesting by the closing market price per common unit on the applicable vesting date.

Pension Benefits for 2017

We do not provide pension benefits to our named executive officers.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2017
We do not provide defined contribution plans for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Other than as described below, none of our named executive officers are entitled to any additional payments or benefits upon termination of employment, upon a change in control of our company or upon retirement, death or disability.
Upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan) or a termination of employment because of death or disability, any unvested DRUs held by any of our named executive officers will automatically be deemed vested as of immediately prior to such occurrence of such change of control or such termination of employment. Had such a change of control or such a termination of employment occurred on December 29, 2017, the last business day of 2017, each of our named executive officers would have vested in the following numbers of DRUs, having the following values based on our closing market price of $22.90 per Carlyle common unit on December 29, 2017: Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello and Rubenstein had no outstanding unvested DRUs at December 29, 2017; Mr. Buser – 284,276 DRUs with an aggregate value of $6,509,920; Mr. Youngkin – 74,625 DRUs with an aggregate value of $1,708,913 and Mr. Ferguson – 130,104 DRUs with an aggregate value of $2,979,382.

Co-Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreements

Severance Arrangements. The Co-Chief Executive Officer employment agreements provide that, upon a termination of employment by a Co-CEO for Good Reason or by Carlyle without Cause, such Co-CEO is entitled to receive cash severance, subject to the execution of a release and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, payable over the 12-month severance period (or, if shorter, through the end of the Term) of a monthly amount equal to annual base salary, Average Annual Bonus (as defined in the employment agreements; the Average Annual Bonus is payable in a lump sum in the later of February 2019 or the end of the severance period if termination occurs in the first year of the Term rather than over a 12-month period) and 12-months of COBRA premiums divided by the number of months in the severance period. Upon a termination of employment by a Co-CEO for Good Reason or by Carlyle without Cause or in the case of the death or disability of a Co-CEO, such Co-CEO is also entitled to a prorated portion of his annual bonus for the portion of the year of termination during which the Co-CEO was employed and, if terminated after the end of a calendar year and before payment of the annual bonus for such year, the annual bonus for the prior year. If a Co-CEO is terminated for any reason other than Cause after the end of the Term, any annual bonus payment for the fifth year of the Term that has not yet been paid will be paid.

Equity Awards. The Co-Chief Executive Officer employment agreements provide that, upon a termination of employment by a Co-CEO for Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreements) or by us without Cause (as defined in the employment agreements), subject to the execution of a release and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, a portion of such Co-CEO’s time-vesting and performance-vesting DRUs will vest (at target with respect to performance-vesting DRUs) on the next scheduled vesting date following the date of such termination, in an amount equal to: (i) the amount that would have vested on such vesting date had such Co-CEO remained employed through such date plus (ii) if such termination occurs in the first four years of the Term, a pro rata portion of the DRUs related to the portion of the year of termination prior to termination (or, if such termination occurs in the January or February prior to the scheduled vesting date in such year, 12 months). If such a termination occurs following a Change of Control during the Term, a Co-CEO will vest in an additional year of DRUs (both time-vesting DRUs and performance-vesting DRUs (at target with respect to performance-vesting DRUs)), but in a maximum amount that is not more than the total number of DRUs granted. Upon the death or disability of a Co-CEO, the time-vesting and performance-vesting DRUs that were granted to such Co-CEO will vest in full (with vesting to occur at the target amount

264






with respect to the performance-vesting DRUs) to the extent not yet vested. Upon a termination of employment of a Co-CEO for Cause, all vested and unvested time-vesting and performance-vesting DRUs of such Co-CEO will be automatically forfeited.If a Co-CEO is terminated for any reason other than Cause after the end of the Term, any time-vesting or performance-vesting DRUs that are not yet vested will continue to vest (based on actual performance for the performance-vesting DRUs).

Restrictive Covenants. The Co-Chief Executive Officer employment agreements also include restrictive covenants limiting the Co-CEO’s ability to solicit employees of Carlyle for 12 months following the termination of employment (but not past the occurrence of a Change of Control) or compete with Carlyle or solicit its investors for 12 months following a termination of employment (but not past the earlier of the end of the Term or the occurrence of a Change of Control). The Co-CEOs are also subject to confidentiality covenants and may not disclose publicly or discuss our fundraising efforts or the name of any fund vehicle that has not had a final closing with any member of the press. The Co-CEOs and Carlyle are subject to certain cooperation covenants and, during a Co-CEOs employment and for five years following a termination, non-disparagement obligations.

Founders’ Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreements
The following is a description of the material terms of the non-competition agreements we have with each of our founders.
Non-Competition. Each founder agreed that during the period he is a controlling partner (as defined in the non-competition agreement) and for the period of three years thereafter (the “Restricted Period”), he will not engage in any business or activity that is competitive with our business.
Non-Solicitation of Carlyle Employees. Each founder agreed that during the Restricted Period, he will not solicit any of our employees, or employees of our subsidiaries, to leave their employment with us or otherwise terminate or cease or materially modify their relationship with us, or employ or engage any such employee.
Non-Solicitation of Clients. In addition, during the Restricted Period, each founder will not solicit any of the investors of the funds we advise to invest in any funds or activities that are competitive with our businesses.
Confidentiality. During the Restricted Period, each founder is required to protect and only use “proprietary information” that relates to our business in accordance with strict restrictions placed by us on its use and disclosure. Each founder agreed that during the Restricted Period he will not disclose any of the proprietary information, except (1) as required by his duties on behalf of Carlyle or with our consent or (2) as required by virtue of subpoena, court or governmental agency order or as otherwise required by law or (3) to a court, mediator or arbitrator in connection with any dispute between such founder and us.
Investment Activities. During the Restricted Period, each founder has agreed that he will not pursue or otherwise seek to develop any investment opportunities under active consideration by Carlyle.
Specific Performance. In the case of any breach of the non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and investment activity limitation provisions, each founder agrees that we will be entitled to seek equitable relief in the form of specific performance and injunctive relief.
Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the ratio of the total annual compensation for each of our co-principal executive officers to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (other than our co-principal executive officers) (the “CEO Pay Ratio”). For 2017, our co-principal executive officers were Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello and Rubenstein. Our CEO Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u). However, due to the flexibility afforded by Item 402(u) in calculating the CEO Pay Ratio, our CEO Pay Ratio may not be comparable to the CEO pay ratios presented by other companies.

As of December 31, 2017, we employed more than 1,600 individuals, including 654 investment professionals, located in 31 offices across six continents. We identified our median employee using our global employee population as of October 31, 2017. To identify our median employee, we used annual base salary and bonuses earned (guaranteed and discretionary) in

265






2017. Application of our consistently applied compensation measure identified eight employees with the same total annual base salary and bonus earned in 2017. Therefore, in order to identify our median employee, we calculated the annual total compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table for all eight employees and identified the two middle employees from the even-numbered group. We then selected our median employee from among the two middle employees by reviewing the components of their annual total compensation and selecting the employee whose compensation characteristics more accurately reflected the compensation of a typical employee.

For 2017, the annual total compensation for each of our co-principal executive officers was $281,750, respectively, and our median employee’s annual total compensation was $201,315. Accordingly, our CEO Pay Ratio for 2017 for each of our co-principal executive officers was 1.4:1.

Going forward, we expect that our CEO Pay Ratio will differ substantially from our 2017 CEO Pay Ratio as a result of the appointments of Messrs. Lee and Youngkin as our new Co-CEOs, effective January 1, 2018. While historically the annual total compensation received by our former co-principal executive officers has been limited solely to an annual base salary and 401(k) matching contributions in light of their unique status as founders of our firm, the employment agreements entered into with our new Co-CEOs provide for additional significant elements of compensation.

Director Compensation

No additional remuneration is paid to our employees or advisors for service as a director or on committees of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Certain of the directors of our general partner are employees or advisors to Carlyle and have received compensation or other payments in respect of their services in such capacities. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Other Transactions.” In addition, each director is reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such service.

In 2017, each director who was not an employee of or advisor to Carlyle received an annual retainer of $225,004, $125,000 of which was paid in cash and $100,004 of which was paid in the form of a grant of DRUs on May 1, 2017. These DRUs will vest on May 1, 2018, the first anniversary of the grant date. We paid an additional $25,000 annual cash retainer to Mr. Shaw, the Chairman of the audit committee for 2017.
At the end of 2017, our Board of Directors reviewed our non-employee director compensation, which has remained unchanged since 2014, and determined it was appropriate to make a moderate increase in the annual compensation payable to non-employee directors of the Company. Beginning in 2018, each director that is not an employee of or advisor to Carlyle will receive an annual retainer of $250,000, $130,000 of which is payable in cash and $120,000 of which is payable in the form of an annual deferred restricted common unit award that will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. In addition and in connection with the above review, our Board of Directors also determined it was appropriate to pay our lead independent director and the Chair of our newly formed compensation and nominating & corporate governance committees the same additional $25,000 annual cash retainer that is paid to the Chair of our audit committee. These changes in the Company’s non-employee director compensation policy are effective as of the beginning of 2018.

Director Compensation in 2017

The following table provides the director compensation for Mr. Hance and Mr. Mathias and our non-employee directors for 2017:
Name
Fees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
 
Stock
Awards(1)
 Total
Lawton W. Fitt$125,000
 $100,004
 $225,004
James H. Hance, Jr. (2)
$
 $
 $
Janet Hill$125,000
 $100,004
 $225,004
Edward J. Mathias (2)(3)
$
 $
 $
Dr. Thomas S. Robertson$125,000
 $100,004
 $225,004
William J. Shaw$150,000
 $100,004
 $250,004
Anthony Welters$125,000
 $100,004
 $225,004
(1)The reference to “stock” in this table refers to DRUs. Amounts represent the grant date fair value of the DRU awards granted on May 1, 2017 to each director who is not an employee of or advisor to the Partnership, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP pertaining to equity-based compensation. For

266






additional information regarding the computation of grant date fair value, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)As Mr. Hance is an Operating Executive and Mr. Mathias is an employee, no additional remuneration is paid to them as directors of our general partner. Mr. Hance and Mr. Mathias’ compensation is discussed in “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
(3)Mr. Mathias resigned as a director of our general partner effective December 31, 2017.
The following table provides information regarding outstanding unvested equity awards held by our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2017:
 Stock Awards (1)
Name
Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
 
Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have Not
Vested (2)
Lawton W. Fitt5,634
 $129,019
Janet Hill5,634
 $129,019
Dr. Thomas S. Robertson5,634
 $129,019
William J. Shaw5,634
 $129,019
Anthony Welters5,634
 $129,019
(1)The references to “stock” or “shares” in this table refer to our DRUs.
(2)The dollar amounts shown under this column were calculated by multiplying the number of unvested DRUs held by the director by the closing market price of $22.90 per Carlyle common unit on December 29, 2017, the last trading day of 2017.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficialInformation relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, security ownership of The Carlyle Group L.P. common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units as of February 9, 2018 by each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of the outstanding voting securities of The Carlyle Group L.P., each of the directors and named executive officerscertain beneficial owners of our general partnercommon stock and all directors and executive officersinformation relating to the security ownership of our general partner as a group. None ofmanagement will be in the directors or executive officers of our general partner hold any preferred units of The Carlyle Group L.P. We are managed by our general partner, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., and the limited partners of The Carlyle Group L.P. do not presently have the right to elect or remove our general partner or its directors. Accordingly, we do not believe that the common units or the preferred units are “voting securities” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-22023 Proxy Statement under the Exchange Act.
 
Common Units
Beneficially Owned
 
Carlyle Holdings
Partnership Units
Beneficially Owned (1)
Name of Beneficial Owner (2)Number 
% of
Class
 Number 
% of
Class
William E. Conway, Jr.
 
 44,499,644
 19.0%
Daniel A. D’Aniello (3)
 
 44,499,644
 19.0%
David M. Rubenstein
 
 46,999,644
 20.0%
Kewsong Lee329,472
 *
 
 
Glenn A. Youngkin (3)389,293
 *
 5,671,088
 2.4%
Lawton W. Fitt25,220
 *
 
 
James H. Hance, Jr.12,285
 *
 251,380
 *
Janet Hill25,220
 *
 
 
Thomas S. Robertson25,220
 *
 
 
William J. Shaw25,220
 *
 
 
Anthony Welters33,643
 *
 
 
Curtis L. Buser70,334
 *
 260,708
 *
Peter J. Clare (3)18,660
 *
 4,611,030
 2.0%
Jeffrey W. Ferguson31,852
 *
 627,816
 *
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)986,419
 *
 147,420,954
 62.8%

267






*Less than 1%
(1)Subject to certain requirements and restrictions, the partnership units of Carlyle Holdings are exchangeable for common units of The Carlyle Group L.P. on a one-for-one basis (subject to the terms of the exchange agreement). A Carlyle Holdings limited partner must exchange one partnership unit in each of the three Carlyle Holdings partnerships to effect an exchange for a common unit. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Exchange Agreement.” Beneficial ownership of Carlyle Holdings partnership units reflected in this table is presented separately from the beneficial ownership of the common units of The Carlyle Group L.P. for which such partnership units may be exchanged.
(2)TCG Carlyle Global Partners L.L.C., an entity wholly owned by our senior Carlyle professionals, holds a special voting unit of The Carlyle Group L.P. that entitles it, on those few matters that may be submitted for a vote of the common unitholders of The Carlyle Group L.P., to participate in the vote on the same basis as the common unitholders and provides it with a number of votes that is equal to the aggregate number of vested and unvested partnership units in Carlyle Holdings held by the limited partners of Carlyle Holdings on the relevant record date.
(3)The Carlyle Holdings partnership units shown in the table above for the named executive officers and directors include the following units held for the benefit of family members with respect to which such person disclaims beneficial ownership: Mr. D’Aniello – 285,714 units held in a trust for which Mr. D’Aniello is the investment trustee; Mr. Youngkin – 142,857 units held in a trust for which Mr. Youngkin is the investment trustee; and Mr. Clare – 273,632 units held in a trust for which Mr. Clare is the investment trustee.

Securitiescaptions “Beneficial Ownership” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation PlansPlans” and is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
The table set forth below provides information concerning
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be in the awards that may2023 Proxy Statement under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Director Independence” and is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services will be issuedin the 2023 Proxy Statement under The Carlyle Group L.P. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”)the caption “Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as of December 31, 2017:our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2023” and is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
239


PART IV.
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as part of this report
1. Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All financial schedules have been omitted because the required information is either presented in the consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or the notes thereto or is not applicable or required.
3. Exhibits
        A list of exhibits required to be filed or furnished as part of this report is set forth in the Exhibit Index below.
(c)    Separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated and fifty percent or less owned persons
    Under Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, we are required to file separate financial statements of FGH Parent, L.P. (“FGH Parent”) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. These separate financial statements are required to be audited only for periods in which FGH Parent is significant based on the applicable significance tests set forth in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the separate financial statements of FGH Parent will contain unaudited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 and audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. We expect to file those financial statements by amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before March 31, 2023 as permitted by Item 3-09(b)(1) of Regulation S-X.
Plan category
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(1)
Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column)
(2)
Exhibit Index
Equity compensation plans approved by security holdersExhibit
No.
15,470,416


Description
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders3.1


Total15,470,416


(1)Reflects the outstanding number of our deferred restricted common units granted under the Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2017.
(2)The aggregate number of our common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units covered by the Equity Incentive Plan is increased on the first day of each fiscal year during its term by a number of units equal to the positive difference, if any, of (a) 10% of the aggregate number of our common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year (excluding Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by The Carlyle Group L.P. or its wholly owned subsidiaries) minus (b) the aggregate number of our common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units which were available for the issuance of future awards under the Equity Plan as of such last day (unless the administrator of the Equity Incentive Plan should decide to increase the number of our common units and Carlyle Holdings partnership units available for future grants under the plan by a lesser amount). As of January 1, 2018, pursuant to this formula, 33,491,450 units were available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. We have filed a registration statement and intend to file additional registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register common units covered by the Equity Incentive Plan (including pursuant to automatic annual increases). Any such Form S-8 registration statement will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, common units registered under such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Tax Receivable Agreement
Limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, may, subject to the terms of the exchange agreement and the Carlyle Holdings partnership agreements, exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for The Carlyle Group L.P.

268






common units on a one-for-one basis. A Carlyle Holdings limited partner must exchange one partnership unit in each of the three Carlyle Holdings partnerships to effect an exchange for a common unit. Carlyle Holdings I L.P. has made an election under Section 754 of the Code effective for each taxable year in which an exchange of partnership units for common units occurred and will do so for all future tax years in which an exchange occurs. The election has resulted in increases to the tax basis of the assets of Carlyle Holdings at the time of an exchange of partnership units and future exchanges are expected to result in similar increases in future tax years. These increases in tax basis have reduced the amount of tax that certain of our subsidiaries, including Carlyle Holdings I GP Inc., which we refer to as, together with any successors thereto, the “corporate taxpayers,” would otherwise be required to pay in current period as well as in the future. These increases in tax basis may also decrease gains (or increase losses) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent tax basis was and is allocated to those capital assets. The IRS may challenge all or part of the tax basis increase and increased deductions, and a court could sustain such a challenge.
We have entered into a tax receivable agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships that provides for the payment by the corporate taxpayers to such owners of 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or foreign or franchise tax that the corporate taxpayers realize (or are deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by the corporate taxpayers or a change in control, as discussed below) as a result of increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to our entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement. This payment obligation is an obligation of the corporate taxpayers and not of Carlyle Holdings. The corporate taxpayers expect to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash tax savings, if any, in income tax they realize. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, the cash tax savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the actual income tax liability of the corporate taxpayers (calculated with certain assumptions) to the amount of such taxes that the corporate taxpayers would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of Carlyle Holdings as a result of the exchanges and had the corporate taxpayers not entered into the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement commenced upon consummation of our initial public offering and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless the corporate taxpayers exercise their right to terminate the tax receivable agreement for an amount based on the agreed payments remaining to be made under the agreement (as described in more detail below) or the corporate taxpayers breach any of their material obligations under the tax receivable agreement in which case all obligations generally will be accelerated and due as if the corporate taxpayers had exercised their right to terminate the tax receivable agreement. We expect that as a result of the size of the increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Carlyle Holdings, the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement will be substantial. There may be a material negative effect on our liquidity if, as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise, the payments under the tax receivable agreement exceed the actual cash tax savings that the corporate taxpayers realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement and/or distributions to the corporate taxpayers by Carlyle Holdings are not sufficient to permit the corporate taxpayers to make payments under the tax receivable agreement after they have paid taxes. Late payments under the tax receivable agreement generally will accrue interest at an uncapped rate equal to LIBOR plus 500 basis points. The payments under the tax receivable agreement are not conditioned upon the continued ownership of us by the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we made payments totaling $2,673,251 pursuant to the tax receivable agreement. Those payments included $251,165 to Mr. Conway; $250,561 to Mr. D'Aniello; $0 to Mr. Rubenstein; $0 to Mr. Youngkin; $0 to Mr. Hance; $0 to Mr. Buser; $89,943 to Mr. Clare; $11,536 to Mr. Ferguson; and $10,080 to Mr. Mathias. None of our independent directors nor Mr. Lee are limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships and hence, they are not eligible to receive any payments under the tax receivable agreement.
In addition, the tax receivable agreement provides that upon certain changes of control, the corporate taxpayers’ (or their successors’) obligations with respect to exchanged or acquired units (whether exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that the corporate taxpayers would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement. Furthermore, the corporate taxpayers may elect to terminate the tax receivable agreement early by making an immediate payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future cash tax savings. In determining such anticipated future cash tax savings, the tax receivable agreement includes several assumptions, including (i) that any Carlyle Holdings partnership units that have not been exchanged are deemed exchanged for the market value of the common units at the time of termination, (ii) the corporate taxpayers will have sufficient taxable income in each future taxable year to fully realize all potential tax savings, (iii) the tax rates for future years will be those specified in the law as in effect at the time of termination and (iv) certain non-amortizable assets are deemed disposed of within specified time periods. In addition, the present value of such anticipated future cash tax savings are discounted at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 basis points.

269






As a result of the change in control provisions and the early termination right, the corporate taxpayers could be required to make payments under the tax receivable agreement that are greater than or less than the specified percentage of the actual cash tax savings that the corporate taxpayers realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement. In these situations, our obligations under the tax receivable agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity.
Decisions we make in the course of running our business may influence the timing and amount of payments that are received by an exchanging or selling limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships under the tax receivable agreement. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction generally will accelerate payments under the tax receivable agreement and increase the present value of such payments, and the disposition of assets before an exchange or acquisition transaction will increase the tax liability of a limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships without giving rise to any rights of a limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships to receive payments under the tax receivable agreement.
Payments under the tax receivable agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we will determine. The corporate taxpayers will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement if a tax basis increase is successfully challenged by the IRS. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the tax receivable agreement in excess of the corporate taxpayers’ cash tax savings.
In the event that The Carlyle Group L.P. or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries become taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, these entities will also be obligated to make payments under the tax receivable agreement on the same basis and to the same extent as the corporate taxpayers.
Registration Rights Agreements
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships who are our personnel, including our inside directors and executive officers, pursuant to which we granted them, their affiliates and certain of their transferees the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions, to require us to register under the Securities Act common units delivered in exchange for Carlyle Holdings partnership units or common units (and other securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our common units) otherwise held by them. Under the registration rights agreement, we agreed to register the exchange of Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units by the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, including certain of our directors and officers. In addition, TCG Carlyle Global Partners L.L.C., an entity wholly-owned by our senior Carlyle professionals, has the right to request that we register the sale of common units held by such persons an unlimited number of times and may require us to make available shelf registration statements permitting sales of common units into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, TCG Carlyle Global Partners L.L.C. has the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in respect of common units held by our pre-IPO owners in connection with registered offerings requested by other registration rights holders or initiated by us.
In addition, in accordance with the terms of the subscription agreement which governs its investment in our business, we entered into a registration rights agreements with Mubadala.
Carlyle Holdings Partnership Agreements
The Carlyle Group L.P. is a holding partnership and, through wholly owned subsidiaries, holds equity interests in Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P. and Carlyle Holdings III L.P., which we refer to collectively as “Carlyle Holdings.” Wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P. are the sole general partner of each of the three Carlyle Holdings partnerships. Accordingly, The Carlyle Group L.P. operates and controls all of the business and affairs of Carlyle Holdings and, through Carlyle Holdings and its operating entity subsidiaries, conducts our business. Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Carlyle Group L.P. has unilateral control over all of the affairs and decision making of Carlyle Holdings. Furthermore, the wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P. cannot be removed as the general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships without their approval. Because our general partner, Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., operates and controls the business of The Carlyle Group L.P., the Board of Directors and officers of our general partner are responsible for all operational and administrative decisions of Carlyle Holdings and the day-to-day management of Carlyle Holdings’ business.
Pursuant to the partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, the wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P. which are the general partners of those partnerships, have the right to determine when distributions will be made to the partners of Carlyle Holdings and the amount of any such distributions. If a distribution is authorized, such

270






distribution will be made to the partners of Carlyle Holdings pro rata in accordance with the percentages of their respective partnership interests.
Each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships has an identical number of partnership units outstanding, and we use the terms “Carlyle Holdings partnership unit” or “partnership unit in/of Carlyle Holdings” to refer, collectively, to a partnership unit in each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. The holders of partnership units in Carlyle Holdings, including The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries, incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on their proportionate share of any net taxable income of Carlyle Holdings. Net profits and net losses of Carlyle Holdings generally will be allocated to its partners (including The Carlyle Group L.P.’s wholly owned subsidiaries) pro rata in accordance with the percentages of their respective partnership interests. The partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships provide for cash distributions, which we refer to as “tax distributions,” to the partners of such partnerships if the wholly owned subsidiaries of The Carlyle Group L.P. which are the general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships determine that the taxable income of the relevant partnership will give rise to taxable income for its partners. Generally, these tax distributions are computed based on our estimate of the net taxable income of the relevant partnership allocable to a partner multiplied by an assumed tax rate equal to the highest effective marginal combined U.S. federal, state and local income tax rate prescribed for an individual or corporate resident in New York, New York (taking into account the non-deductibility of certain expenses and the character of our income). Tax distributions are made only to the extent all distributions from such partnerships for the relevant year are insufficient to cover such tax liabilities.
The partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships contain non-solicitation provisions that provide that during the term of his or her employment and for a period of one year after the effective date of his or her withdrawal, resignation or expulsion, each limited partner of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships that is employed by us shall not, directly or indirectly, whether alone or in concert with other persons, solicit any person employed by us or our affiliates to abandon such employment, hire any person who is, or within the prior year was, employed by us or solicit any Carlyle fund investor for the purpose of obtaining funds or inducing such fund investor to make an investment which is sponsored or promoted by such person.
The partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships also provide that substantially all of our expenses, including substantially all expenses solely incurred by or attributable to The Carlyle Group L.P. such as expenses incurred in connection with our initial public offering but not including obligations incurred under the tax receivable agreement by The Carlyle Group L.P. or its wholly owned subsidiaries, income tax expenses of The Carlyle Group L.P. or its wholly owned subsidiaries and payments on indebtedness incurred by The Carlyle Group L.P. or its wholly owned subsidiaries, are borne by Carlyle Holdings.
On September 13, 2017, in connection with the issuance of the Series A Preferred Units, the limited partnership agreements of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships were amended to provide for preferred units with economic terms designed to mirror those of the Series A Preferred Units, which we refer to as the Mirror Units. The Carlyle Group L.P., directly or through its wholly owned subsidiaries, holds all of the issued and outstanding Mirror Units.
Exchange Agreement
We have entered into an exchange agreement with the limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. Under the exchange agreement, which includes applicable remaining vesting and minimum retained ownership requirements and other applicable transfer restrictions, each holder and certain transferees of Carlyle Holdings partnership units may exchange these partnership units for The Carlyle Group L.P. common units on a one-for-one basis up to four times per year, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for splits, unit distributions and reclassifications. Following such exchanges, the common units typically will be immediately sold.
As of December 31, 2017, limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships owned an aggregate of 234,813,858 Carlyle Holdings partnership units (including the Holdings Units held by Mubadala). All of the Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by our founders and Mubadala are fully vested. Of the outstanding Carlyle Holdings partnership units held by our other senior Carlyle professionals, 89% are vested and 11% are unvested as of December 31, 2017. The remaining unvested Carlyle Holdings units generally will vest in one remaining installment on May 2, 2018. Commencing in the second quarter of 2017, senior Carlyle professionals were able to exchange their Carlyle Holdings partnership units for common units on a quarterly basis, subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement. We facilitate an orderly exchange process to seek to minimize the impact on the trading price of our common units.

271






In addition, Mubadala is generally entitled to exchange Carlyle Holdings partnerships units for common units at any time. Under the exchange agreement, to effect an exchange a holder of partnership units in Carlyle Holdings must simultaneously exchange one partnership unit in each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. The Carlyle Group L.P. will hold, through wholly owned subsidiaries, a number of Carlyle Holdings partnership units equal to the number of common units that The Carlyle Group L.P. has issued. As a holder exchanges its Carlyle Holdings partnership units, The Carlyle Group L.P.’s indirect interest in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships will be correspondingly increased.
Firm Use of Our Executive Officers' Private Aircraft
In the normal course of business, our personnel have made use of aircraft owned by entities controlled by Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello, Rubenstein and Lee. Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello, Rubenstein and Lee paid for their purchases of the aircraft and bear all operating, personnel and maintenance costs associated with their operation for personal use. Payment by us for the business use of these aircraft by Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello, Rubenstein and Lee and other of our personnel is made at market rates, which during 2017 totaled $8,700 for Mr. Conway, $232,065 for Mr. D’Aniello, $436,385 for Mr. Rubenstein and $66,499 for Mr. Lee. We also made payments for services and supplies relating to business use flight operations to managers of the aircrafts of Messrs. D’Aniello, Conway, Rubenstein and Lee, which during 2017 aggregated $470,886 in the case of Mr. Conway’s aircraft, $972,397 in the case of Mr. D’Aniello’s aircraft, $2,897,308 in the case of Mr. Rubenstein’s aircraft and $178,613 in the case of Mr. Lee's aircraft. Consistent with the terms of our agreement with a third party administrator (the "Aircraft Administrator"), in 2017, we received payments from and made payments to the Aircraft Administrator to adjust the estimated annual costs of operating the aircraft related to 2016 flight operations. In 2017, we made payments to the Aircraft Administrator in the amount of $18,170 related to Mr. Conway's aircraft, and received payments from the Aircraft Administrator in the amounts of $65,606 and $73,182 related to Mr. D'Aniello's and Mr. Rubenstein's aircraft, respectively.
Investments In and Alongside Carlyle Funds
Our directors and executive officers are permitted to co-invest their own capital in and alongside our investment funds. The opportunity to invest in and alongside our investment funds is also available to all of our senior Carlyle professionals and to those of our employees whom we have determined have a status that reasonably permits us to offer them these types of investments in compliance with applicable laws. We encourage our eligible professionals to invest in and alongside our investment funds because we believe that such investing further aligns the interests of our professionals with those of our fund investors and our firm. Our directors and officers may also purchase outstanding interests in our investment funds, whereupon the interests may no longer be subject to management fees or carried interest in some cases.
Co-investments are investments in investment vehicles or other assets on the same terms and conditions as those available to the applicable fund, except that these co-investments generally are not subject to management fees, incentive fees or carried interest. These co-investments are funded with our professionals’ own “after tax” cash and not with deferral of management or incentive fees. Co-investors are responsible for their pro-rata share of partnership and other general and administrative fees and expenses. In addition, our directors and executive officers are permitted to invest their own capital directly in investment funds we advise, in most instances not subject to management fees, incentive fees or carried interest. We intend to continue our co-investment program and we expect that our eligible professionals, including our senior Carlyle professionals and our executive officers and directors collectively will continue to invest significant amounts of their own capital in and alongside the investment funds that we advise or manage.
Certain members of the Board of Directors of our general partner are employees of Carlyle (Messrs. Conway, D’Aniello, Rubenstein, Lee, Youngkin and Clare) and one member of the Board of Directors of our general partner is an operating executive of Carlyle (Mr. Hance) and each also own investments in and alongside our investment funds. The amount invested in and alongside our investment funds during 2017 by certain of our directors and by our executive officers (and their family members and investment vehicles), including amounts funded pursuant to third party capital commitments assumed by such persons, was $161,847,726 for Mr. Conway; $123,535,882 for Mr. D’Aniello; $120,123,945 for Mr. Rubenstein; $4,576,722 for Mr. Lee; $17,774,580 for Mr. Youngkin; $987,669 for Mr. Hance; $600,546 for Mr. Shaw; $1,947,335 for Mr. Welters; $681,986 for Mr. Buser; $24,686,514 for Mr. Clare; $804,499 for Mr. Ferguson; and $28,925 for Mr. Mathias. None of Ms. Fitt, Ms. Hill or Mr. Robertson made any co-investments in 2017.
Certain of our directors and our executive officers (and their family members and investment vehicles) also made additional commitments to our investment funds during 2017. In the aggregate, our directors and executive officers (and their family members and investment vehicles) made commitments to our investment funds during 2017 of approximately $752.4 million, and the total unfunded commitments of our directors and executive officers (and their family members and investment vehicles) to our investment funds as of December 31, 2017 was $291,888,653 for Mr. Conway; $271,593,388 for

272






Mr. D’Aniello; $291,147,571 for Mr. Rubenstein; $13,632,202 for Mr. Lee; $65,748,239 for Mr. Youngkin; $3,553,074 for Mr. Hance; $2,489,327 for Mr. Shaw; $24,272,617 for Mr. Welters; $2,794,298 for Mr. Buser; $70,583,251 for Mr. Clare; $2,105,645 for Mr. Ferguson and $105,039 for Mr. Mathias. None of Ms. Fitt, Ms. Hill or Mr. Robertson has any unfunded commitments to our investment funds as of December 31, 2017.
Other Transactions
Mr. Hance, a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner, is an Operating Executive of Carlyle and received, for the year ended December 31, 2017, an operating executive fee in respect of his service in such capacity of $250,000 and, on May 1, 2017, a grant of 5,634 deferred restricted common units. Mr. Hance was also previously allocated direct carried interest ownership at the fund level in respect of certain corporate private equity funds. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Mr. Hance received distributions of $7,241 in respect of such carried interest.
Mr. Mathias, who resigned as a member of the Board of Directors of our general partner on December 31, 2017, is a Managing Director of Carlyle and received, for the year ended December 31, 2017, total cash compensation in respect of his service in such capacity of $865,381. Mr. Mathias received a salary of $250,000. Of Mr. Mathias’ $500,000 discretionary bonus, $450,000 was paid in cash and the balance was mandatorily granted in deferred restricted common units in February 2018. These deferred restricted common units will vest on August 1, 2019. Mr. Mathias was also previously allocated interests in the firm’s equity pool, as well as direct carried interest ownership at the fund level in respect of certain corporate private equity funds. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Mr. Mathias received distributions of $2,130 in respect of such equity pool and of $163,251 in respect of such carried interest.
Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons
The Board of Directors of our general partner has adopted a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related persons, which we refer to as our “related person policy.” Our related person policy requires that a “related person” (as defined in paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K) must promptly disclose to the General Counsel of our general partner any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. The General Counsel will then promptly communicate that information to our conflicts committee or another independent body of the Board of Directors of our general partner. No related person transaction will be executed without the approval or ratification of our conflicts committee or another independent body of the Board of Directors of our general partner. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote of a related person transaction in which they have an interest.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Under our partnership agreement we generally will indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses (including legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, penalties, interest, settlements or other amounts on an after tax basis: our general partner, any departing general partner, any person who is or was a tax matters partner, officer or director of our general partner or any departing general partner, any officer or director of our general partner or any departing general partner who is or was serving at the request of our general partner or any departing general partner as an officer, director, employee, member, partner, tax matters partner, agent, fiduciary or trustee of another person, any person who is named in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as being or about to become a director or a person performing similar functions of our general partner and any person our general partner in its sole discretion designates as an “indemnitee” for purposes of our partnership agreement. We have agreed to provide this indemnification unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that these persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct. We have also agreed to provide this indemnification for criminal proceedings. Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of our assets. The general partner will not be personally liable for, or have any obligation to contribute or loan funds or assets to us to enable it to effectuate, indemnification. We may purchase insurance against liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by persons for our activities, regardless of whether we would have the power to indemnify the person against liabilities under our partnership agreement.
In addition, we have entered into indemnification arrangements with each of our executive officers and directors. The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense

273






advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. We also indemnify such persons to the extent they serve at our request as directors, officers, employees or other agents of any other entity, such as an investment vehicle advised by us or its portfolio companies.
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in millions):
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Carlyle   Carlyle Funds   Total
Audit Fees$5.9
 (a)  $13.9
 (d)  $19.8
Audit-Related Fees$1.9
 (b)  $12.4
 (e)  $14.3
Tax Fees$1.0
 (c)  $0.3
 (d)  $1.3
All Other Fees$
    $
    $
Total$8.8
    $26.6
    $35.4
 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Carlyle   Carlyle Funds   Total
Audit Fees$6.2
 (a)  $13.4
 (d)  $19.6
Audit-Related Fees$0.1
 (b)  $10.1
 (e)  $10.2
Tax Fees$0.7
 (c)  $0.8
 (d)  $1.5
All Other Fees$
    $
    $
Total$7.0
    $24.3
    $31.3
(a)Audit Fees consisted of fees for (1) the audits of our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our internal controls over financial reporting, and services required by statute or regulation; (2) reviews of interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; (3) comfort letters, consents and other services related to SEC and other regulatory filings. This also includes fees for accounting consultation billed as audit services.
(b)Audit-Related Fees consisted of due diligence in connection with acquisitions, and other audit and attest services not required by statute or regulation.
(c)Tax Fees consisted of fees for services rendered for tax compliance and tax planning and advisory services. We also use other accounting firms to provide these services. Fees for tax compliance services were approximately $0.4 million and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(d)Ernst & Young also provided audit and tax services to certain investment funds managed by Carlyle in its capacity as the general partner or investment advisor. The tax services provided consist primarily of tax compliance and tax advisory services. We also use other accounting firms to provide these services. Fees for tax compliance services were approximately $0 and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(e)Audit-Related Fees included assurance, merger and acquisition due diligence services provided in connection with contemplated investments by Carlyle-sponsored investment funds and attest services not required by statute or regulation. In addition, Ernst & Young provided audit, audit-related, tax and other services to certain Carlyle fund portfolio companies, which are approved directly by the portfolio company’s management and are not included in the amounts presented here. We also use other accounting firms to provide these services.
Our audit committee charter, which is available on our website at www.carlyle.com under “Public Investors”, requires the audit committee to approve in advance all audit and non-audit related services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the audit and non-audit related services pre-approval policy. All services reported in the Audit, Audit-Related, and Tax categories above were approved by the audit committee.


274






PART IV.
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following is a list of all exhibits filed or furnished as part of this report:
Exhibit
No.
Description
3.1
3.2
4.13.2
3.3
4.2
4.34.1
4.4
4.54.2
240




4.6Exhibit
No.
Description

4.3
4.74.4
4.84.5
10.14.6
10.2
10.3
10.4

275






Exhibit
No.
4.7
Description
10.4.1
4.8
10.4.24.9
4.10
4.11


10.54.12

4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
241




Exhibit
No.
Description

10.1
10.610.2
10.3
10.710.4
10.8+10.5+
10.9+10.6+
10.10+10.7+
10.11+10.8+
10.1210.9+
10.10+
10.11+
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15

276






10.16.110.15
10.17
10.17.1
10.18
10.18.1
10.19*


10.20
242




10.21Exhibit
No.
Description

10.16
10.2210.17
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2011,February 11, 2019 among TC Group Investment Holdings, L.P., TC Group Investment Holdings, L.P., TC Group Cayman Investment Holdings, L.P., TC Group Cayman, L.P., and Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., as Borrowers, TC Group, L.L.C., Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.P. and Carlyle Holdings III L.P. as Parent Guarantor,Guarantors, the Lenders party hereto, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.Citibank N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Credit Suisse Funding LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC as Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019).
10.18
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2022 among TC Group Cayman, L.P., Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., and CG Subsidiary Holdings L.L.C., as Borrowers, TC Group, L.L.C., Carlyle Holdings I L.P., Carlyle Holdings II L.L.C., Carlyle Holdings III L.P. and Carlyle Finance Subsidiary L.L.C. as Guarantors, the Lenders Party Hereto, and Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, BofA Securities, (USA)Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Credit Suisse Securities (USA)Loan Funding LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents.Agents (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2410.22 to the Registrant’s Registration StatementRegistrants Quarterly Report on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-176685)10-Q filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012)July 28, 2022).
10.22.1

277






Exhibit
No.10.19+
Description
10.22.2
Amendment No. 2, dated asForm of May 5, 2015, to the CreditIndemnification Agreement dated as of December 13, 2011, among TC Group Investment Holdings, L.P., TC Group Cayman Investment Holdings, L.P., TC Group Cayman, L.P., Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., as Borrowers, TC Group, L.L.C., the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24.210.23 to the Registrant’s QuarterlyRegistrants Annual Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-35538)10-K filed with the SEC on May 7, 2015)February 12, 2020).
10.22.3
10.20+
10.23
10.24+*
10.25+*10.21+
10.22+
10.23*†+
10.26+*10.24*†+
10.25+
10.26+
10.27+
10.28+
10.27+10.29+
10.30+
10.31+
243




10.28+Exhibit
No.
Description

10.32+
12.1*10.33+
21.1*10.34+
21.1*
23.1*22*
23.1*
31.1*24.1*
31.1*
31.2*
31.3*
32.1*
32.2*
32.3*
99.1

101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH
Exhibit
No.
Description
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104The cover page from The Carlyle Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, formatted in Inline XBRL (included within the Exhibit 101 attachments).
*    Filed herewith

†    Certain schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Company undertakes to furnish supplemental copies of any of the omitted schedules to the SEC upon request.
278+    Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which directors and/or executive officers are eligible to participate.






*Filed herewith.
+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which directors and/or executive officers are eligible to participate.
The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
279
244







SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 15, 20189, 2023
 
The Carlyle Group L.P.Inc.
By: Carlyle Group Management L.L.C., its general partner
By:
By:/s/ Curtis L. Buser
Name: Curtis L. Buser
Title: Chief Financial Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints William E. Conway, Jr. and Curtis L. Buser, jointly and severally, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Carlyle Group Inc., and any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his, her or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 15th9th day of February 2018.2023.
 
245


SignatureTitle
/s/ William E. Conway, Jr.Jr
William E. Conway, Jr.
Co-Executive Chairman, Co-Chief InvestmentInterim Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder, Co-Chairman and Director
(principal executive officer)
/s/ Curtis L. Buser
Curtis L. Buser
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
/s/ Daniel A. D’Aniello
Daniel A. D’Aniello
Co-Founder, Chairman Emeritus and Director
/s/ David M. Rubenstein
David M. Rubenstein
Co-Executive ChairmanCo-Founder, Co-Chairman and Director
/s/ Kewsong LeePeter J. Clare
Kewsong LeePeter J. Clare
Co-Chief ExecutiveChief Investment Officer for Corporate Private Equity, Chairman of the Americas and Director
(co-principal executive officer)
/s/ Glenn A. YoungkinLinda H. Filler
Glenn A. YoungkinLinda H. Filler
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director
(co-principal executive officer)
/s/ Lawton W. Fitt
Lawton W. Fitt
Director
/s/ James H. Hance, Jr.
James H. Hance, Jr.
Director
/s/ Janet HillMark S. Ordan
Janet HillMark S. Ordan
Director
/s/ Derica W. Rice
Derica W. Rice
Director
/s/ Dr. Thomas S. Robertson
Dr. Thomas S. Robertson
Director
/s/ William J. Shaw
William J. Shaw
Director
/s/ Anthony Welters
Anthony Welters
Director
/s/ Curtis L. BuserCharles E. Andrews, Jr.
Curtis L. BuserCharles E. Andrews, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
/s/ Pamela L. Bentley
Pamela L. Bentley
Chief Accounting Officer

(principal accounting officer)
/s/ Peter J. Clare
Peter J. Clare
Co-Chief Investment Officer and Director



280

246