UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________________
FORM 10-K
_______________________
(Mark One)
|
| | | | |
x☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20182020
or
|
| | | | |
¨☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 1-35305
______________________
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_______________________
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Missouri | | | 45-3355106 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | | |
| 2503 S. Hanley Road | St. Louis Missouri | Missouri | 63144 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(314) 644-7600
_______________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $.01$0.01 par value | POST | New York Stock Exchange Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
_______________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x☒ Yes ¨☐ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨☐ Yes x☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x☒ Yes ¨☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). x☒ Yes ¨☐ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | | x☒ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer | | ¨☐ | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨☐ |
| | | | Emerging growth company | | ¨☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨☐ Yes x☒ No
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 31, 2018,2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $4,367,483,164.$4,680,868,433.
Number of shares of Common Stock, $.01$0.01 par value, outstanding as of November 12, 2018: 66,573,47016, 2020: 65,848,095
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 20192021 annual meeting of shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after September 30, 2018,2020, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| PART I |
| | |
| |
| | |
PART I |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| PART II |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| PART III |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| PART IV |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”), are made throughout this report.report, including statements regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and our continuing response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These forward-looking statements are sometimes identified from the use of forward-looking words such as “believe,” “should,” “could,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “intend,” “plan,” “forecast,” “target,” “is likely,” “will,” “can,” “may,”“may” or “would” or the negative of these terms or similar expressions elsewhere in this report. Our financial condition, results of operations financial condition and cash flows may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on management’s current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that could affect expected results. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
•the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including negative impacts on the global economy and capital markets, the health of our employees, our ability to manufacture and deliver our products, operating costs, demand for our foodservice and on-the-go products and our operations generally;
•our high leverage, our ability to obtain additional financing (including both secured and unsecured debt) and, our ability to service our outstanding debt (including covenants that restrict the operation of our business); and a downgrade or potential downgrade in our credit ratings;
•our ability to continue to compete in our product categories and our ability to retain our market position and favorable perceptions of our brands;
•our ability to anticipate and respond to changes in consumer and customer preferences and trendsbehaviors and introduce new products;
•changes in economic conditions, disruptions in the possibility that we may not be able to consummateUnited States (the “U.S.”) and global capital and credit markets, changes in interest rates, volatility in the initial public offeringmarket value of derivatives and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
•disruptions or inefficiencies in our supply chain, including as a result of our Active Nutrition businessreliance on third party suppliers or manufacturers for the expected timeline or at all, that we may not be able to create value in our Active Nutrition business through such transaction or that the pursuitmanufacturing of such transaction could be disruptive to us and our Active Nutrition business;
our ability to identify, complete and integrate acquisitions and manage our growth;
our ability to promptly and effectively realize the expected synergiesmany of our acquisitionproducts, pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Bob Evans”) within the expected timeframe or at all;contagious diseases, fires and evacuations related thereto, changes in weather conditions, natural disasters, agricultural diseases and pests and other events beyond our control;
higher freight costs, •significant volatility in the costscost or availability of certaininputs to our business (including freight, raw materials, commodities or packaging used to manufacture our products or higher energy costs;and other supplies);
impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles;
•our ability to successfully implement business strategieshire and retain talented personnel, the ability of our employees to reduce costs;safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness (such as COVID-19), employee absenteeism, labor strikes, work stoppages and unionization efforts;
•allegations that our products cause injury or illness, product recalls and withdrawals and product liability claims and other related litigation;
•our ability to identify, complete and integrate or otherwise effectively execute acquisitions or other strategic transactions and effectively manage our growth;
•our ability to promptly and effectively realize the strategic and financial benefits expected as a result of the initial public offering of a minority interest in our BellRing Brands business, which consists of our historical active nutrition business;
•impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles;
•our ability to successfully implement business strategies to reduce costs;
•legal and regulatory factors, such as compliance with existing laws and regulations, and changes to andas well as new laws and regulations and changes to existing laws and regulations and interpretations thereof, affecting our business, including current and future laws and regulations regarding food safety, advertising and labeling and animal feeding and housing operations;
•the loss of, a significant reduction of purchases by or the bankruptcy of a major customer;
•the failure or weakening of the ready-to-eat cereal category and consolidations in the retail and foodservice distribution channels;
losses incurred in the appraisal proceedings brought in connection with our acquisition of Bob Evans by former Bob Evans stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares;
•the ultimate impact litigation or other regulatory matters may have on us;
disruptions or inefficiencies in the supply chain, including as a result
•our ability to successfully collaborate with the private equity firm Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., whose affiliatesthird parties that have invested with us in 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”); and to effectively realize the strategic and financial benefits expected as a result of the separate capitalization of 8th Avenue;
•costs associated with Bob Evans’sEvans Farms, Inc.’s (“Bob Evans”) obligations in connection with the sale and separation of its restaurantrestaurants business in April 2017, which occurred prior to our acquisition of Bob Evans, including certain indemnification obligations under the restaurants sale agreement and Bob Evans’s payment and performance obligations as a guarantor for certain leases;
•our ability to protect our intellectual property and other assets and to continue to use third party intellectual property subject to intellectual property licenses;
•the ability of our and our customers’, and 8th Avenue’s and its customers’, private brand products to compete with nationally branded products;
our ability to successfully operate•risks associated with our international operations in compliance with applicable laws and regulations;businesses;
changes in economic conditions, disruptions in the United States and global capital and credit markets, changes in interest rates and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
•the impact of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union (commonly known as “Brexit”) on us and our operations;
changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments, including those based on tax reform;
loss of key employees, labor strikes, work stoppages or unionization efforts;
losses or increased funding and expenses related to our qualified pension or other postretirement plans;
•costs, business disruptions and reputational damage associated with information technology failures, cybersecurity incidents or information security breaches;
•changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments;
•losses or increased funding and expenses related to our ability to protect our intellectual property andqualified pension or other assets;postretirement plans;
•significant differences in our, and 8th Avenue’s and BellRing Brands, Inc.’s actual operating results from our guidance regarding our and 8th Avenue’s future performance and BellRing Brands, Inc.’s guidance regarding its future performance;
•our ability and BellRing Brands, Inc.’s ability to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; and
•other risks and uncertainties included under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.
RISK FACTORS SUMMARY
We are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including risks related to our business, risks related to our indebtedness, risks related to our common stock and certain general risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Risks that we deem material are described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Global health developments and economic uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted, and are expected to continue to impact, our financial and operational performance.
•We have substantial debt and high leverage, which could have a negative impact on our financing options and liquidity position and could adversely affect our business.
•Despite our current level of indebtedness, we may be able to incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks related to our debt and leverage.
•The agreements governing our debt, including the indentures governing our senior notes, contain, or may in future financings contain, various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions and also require us to meet financial maintenance tests, and failure to comply with these covenants could have a material adverse effect on us.
•We operate in categories with strong competition.
•We must identify changing consumer and customer preferences and behaviors and develop and offer products to meet these preferences and behaviors.
•Our results may be adversely impacted if consumers do not maintain favorable perceptions of our brands.
•Uncertain or unfavorable economic conditions, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could limit consumer and customer demand for our products or otherwise adversely affect us.
•Disruption of our supply chain, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and changes in weather conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•We are currently dependent upon third party suppliers and manufacturers for the manufacturing of many of our products. Our business could suffer as a result of a third party’s inability to supply materials for our products or produce our products for us on time or to our specifications.
•Increased input costs, including costs for freight, raw materials, energy and other supplies, or limited availability of such inputs could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•We may not be able to operate successfully if we are unable to recruit, hire, retain and develop key personnel and a qualified and diverse workforce. In addition, we are dependent upon our employees being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness (such as COVID-19).
•Our borrowing costs and access to capital and credit markets could be adversely affected by a downgrade or potential downgrade of our credit ratings.
•U.S. and global capital and credit market issues, including those that have arisen or may arise as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could negatively affect our liquidity, increase our costs of borrowing and disrupt the operations of our suppliers and customers.
•If our products become adulterated or contaminated, or if they are misbranded or mislabeled, we might need to recall or withdraw those items and may experience product liability claims if consumers are injured.
•Our business strategy depends upon us identifying and completing additional acquisitions and other strategic transactions. We may not be able to successfully consummate favorable strategic transactions in the future. Our corporate development activities also may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•We may experience difficulties in integrating acquired businesses, or acquisitions may not perform as expected.
•Impairment in the carrying value of intangible assets could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. If our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we will be required to record additional impairment charges, which may be significant.
•Violations of laws or regulations, as well as new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations or to interpretations thereof, could adversely affect our business.
•The loss of, a significant reduction of purchases by or the bankruptcy of a major customer may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•Our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments operate in the historically mature ready-to-eat cereal category, and the failure or weakening of this category could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•Consolidation in the retail and foodservice distribution channels, and competitive, economic and other pressures facing our customers, may hurt our profit margins.
•Pending and future litigation may impair our reputation or cause us to incur significant costs.
•Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products and brands.
•Our international operations subject us to additional risks, including, among others, unfavorable changes to tariffs, quotas, trade barriers, export or import restrictions or treaties; challenges with cross-border product distribution; increased exposure to general market conditions, political and economic uncertainty and other events outside of the U.S.; compliance with additional U.S. laws as well as laws outside of the U.S.; and the difficulty of conducting operations across diverse regions and employee bases.
•Technology failures, cybersecurity incidents or corruption of our data privacy protections could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.
•Agricultural diseases or pests could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•Actual operating results may differ significantly from our or BellRing Brands, Inc.’s guidance.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTIONIntroduction
Post Holdings, Inc. is a Missouri corporation incorporated on September 22, 2011. Our principal executive offices are located at 2503 S. Hanley Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63144. We are a consumer packaged goods holding company operating in the center-of-the-store, refrigerated, foodservice, food ingredient activeand convenient nutrition andfood categories. We also participate in the private brand food categories.category, including through our investment with third parties in 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”). Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, all references in this Form 10-K to “Post,” “the Company,” “us,” “our” or “we” mean Post Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, which includes 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”) and its subsidiaries when referencing a time period on or prior to September 30, 2018 and excludes 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries when referencing a time period after September 30, 2018.subsidiaries.
On February 3, 2012, Post completed its legal separation via a tax free spin-off from ourits former parent company. On February 6, 2012, Post common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “POST.” As of September 30, 2018, Post operated“POST”. We operate in five reportable segments:
•Post Consumer Brands: Includes branded and private label ready-to-eat (“RTE”) cereal operations of Post Foods, LLC, MOM Brands Company, LLC (“MOM Brands”), which Post acquired in May 2015, and Weetabix North America (“Weetabix NA”), which Post acquired as part of its acquisition of Latimer Newco 2 Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (“Latimer”), and all of Latimer’s direct and indirect subsidiaries at the time of acquisition, including Weetabix Limited (collectively, the “Weetabix Group”), in July 2017;
•Weetabix: Includes the businessesbusiness of Weetabix Limited, which produces and its direct subsidiaries (“Weetabix”), which produce and distributedistributes branded and private label RTE cereal, hot cereals and other cereal-based food products, breakfast drinks and muesli primarily outside of North America, which Post acquired as part of its acquisition of the Weetabix Group in July 2017;
Refrigerated Food•Foodservice: Includes primarily egg and potato products in the foodservice and food ingredient channels from the businesses of MFI Holding Corporation (“Michael Foods”), which Post acquired in June 2014, Willamette Egg Farms, LLC (“Willamette”), which Post acquired in October 2015, National Pasteurized Eggs, Inc. (“NPE”), which Post acquired in October 2016, and Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Bob Evans”) after its acquisition, which Post acquired in January 2018, and is comprised of2018;
•Refrigerated Retail: Provides refrigerated foodservice, primarily egg and potato, and refrigerated retail products, inclusive of side dishes, eggs and egg products, sausage, cheese and sausage;
other dairy and refrigerated products, from the businesses of Bob Evans, Michael Foods, including the business of Crystal Farms Dairy Company (“Crystal Farms”), which Post acquired as a part of its acquisition of Michael Foods in June 2014, Willamette and NPE; and•BellRing Brands (historically referred to as Active Nutrition): IncludesProvides products in the convenient nutrition category, including ready-to-drink (“RTD”) protein shakes, bars andother RTD beverages, powders and nutritional supplementnutrition bars, from the businesses of Premier Nutrition Corporation (“PNC”),Company, LLC, which Post acquired in September 2013, Dymatize Enterprises, LLC, (“Dymatize”), which Post acquired in February 2014, and the PowerBar brand, which Post acquired in October 2014, and includes Active Nutrition International;International GmbH, which manufactures and
sells convenient nutrition products in certain international markets.Private Brands: IncludedOn October 21, 2019, the businessesinitial public offering (the “IPO”) of Attune Foods, LLC, which is composeda minority interest in our historical active nutrition business was completed. As a result of the former businessIPO and certain other transactions completed in connection with the IPO (the “formation transactions”), BellRing Brands, Inc. (“BellRing”) is a holding company owning 28.8% of Attune Foods, Inc., acquired by Post in December 2012,the non-voting membership units (the “BellRing Brands, LLC units”) of BellRing Brands, LLC and the granola and snacks business of Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC, acquired by Post in an asset purchase in May 2013, Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (“Dakota Growers”a publicly-traded company whose Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), acquiredis traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “BRBR”. Post owns 71.2% of the BellRing Brands, LLC units and one share of BellRing’s Class B common stock, $0.01 par value per share, which, for so long as Post or its affiliates (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) directly own more than 50% of the BellRing Brands, LLC units, represents 67% of the combined voting power of the common stock of BellRing. BellRing Brands, LLC is the holding company for Post’s historical active nutrition business. Effective October 21, 2019, the financial results of BellRing and its subsidiaries are consolidated within the Company’s financial results and 28.8% of the consolidated net income (loss) and net assets of BellRing and its subsidiaries, representing the percentage of economic interest in BellRing Brands, LLC held by PostBellRing (and therefore indirectly held by the public stockholders of BellRing through their ownership of the Class A Common Stock), are allocated to noncontrolling interest. For additional information, refer to Notes 1 and 8 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in January 2014, and Golden Boy Foods Ltd. (“Golden Boy”), acquired by Post in February 2014, which collectively produce private label peanut and other nut butters, dried fruit and nuts, pasta products and premium natural and organic granola, cereals and snacks, as well as the businessItem 8 of American Blanching Company (“ABC”), acquired by Post in November 2014, which provides peanut blanching, granulation and roasting services for the commercial peanut industry.
this report.On October 1, 2018, Post, together with its subsidiary, 8th Avenue completed its previously announced transaction with affiliates of the private equity firm Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (collectively, “THL”), in whichwas separately capitalized by Post and THL separately capitalized 8th Avenue.third parties through a series of transactions, and 8th Avenue became the holding company for Post’s private brandsbrand food products business, which haswas historically been reported and is reported herein as Post’s Private Brands segment. After completion of the transaction,transactions, Post retained 60.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue,
which, effective October 1, 2018, is accounted for using the equity method and is no longer consolidated in the Company'sCompany’s financial statements, and thestatements. The private brands business iswas no longer considered a reportable segment of Post.
On November 15, 2018, Post announced its intentionas of October 1, 2018. For additional information, refer to pursue an initial public offeringNotes 6 and 8 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8 of its Active Nutrition business.
Additional information about us, including our Form 10, Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q, Forms 8-K, other securities filings (and amendments thereto), press releasesthis report. 8th Avenue primarily manufactures and distributes private label peanut and other important announcements, is available atnut butters, dried fruit and nut products, granola and pasta.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused and continues to cause global economic disruption and uncertainty, including in our website at www.postholdings.com orbusiness. We are closely monitoring the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) website at www.sec.gov (for securities filings only). These documents can be printed free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after their electronic filing with the SEC or their release, as applicable. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct and the chartersimpact of the AuditCOVID-19 pandemic and Corporate Governancedevelopments related thereto and
Compensation Committees are taking necessary actions to ensure our ability to safeguard the health of our Boardemployees, including their economic health, maintain the continuity of Directors also are availableour supply chain to serve customers and consumers and preserve financial liquidity to navigate the uncertainty caused by the pandemic. For discussion regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our website, where they can be printed freebusiness and financial results, see “Sales, Marketing and Distribution” below and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of charge. AllFinancial Condition and Results of these documents also are available to shareholders at no charge upon request sent to our corporate secretary (2503 S. Hanley Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63144-2503, Telephone: 314-644-7600). The information on our website is not partOperations” in Item 7 and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report.
Our Business Model
We operate a decentralized, adaptive business model, which provides us with flexibility to pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions. Since our formation, we have expanded and established new platforms through numerous acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy has focused on businesses with product offerings that can strengthen our current portfolio, enable us to expand into complementary categories, geographic regions or distribution channels or provide diversification of cash flows in similar channels. In addition to acquisitions, we also have pursued and completed other types of strategic transactions. For example, we separately capitalized 8th Avenue with third parties on October 1, 2018 and the IPO of BellRing was completed on October 21, 2019.
Our Businesses
Post Consumer Brands
Our Post Consumer Brands segment includes our North America cereal business which manufactures, markets and sells branded and private label RTE cereal and hot cereal products. The RTE cereal category is one of the most prominent categories in the food industry. According to Nielsen’s expanded All Outlets Combined (xAOC)(“xAOC”) information, the category was approximately $8.2$9.0 billion in sales for the 52-week period endingended October 27, 2018.24, 2020. We have leveraged the strength of our brands, category expertise and over a century of institutional knowledge to create a diverse portfolio of cereals. Post Consumer Brands is the third largest seller of RTE cereals in the United States (the “U.S.”) with a 20.1%19.6% branded share of retail dollar sales and a 22.7%22.1% branded share of retail pound sales for the 52-week period endingended October 27, 2018,24, 2020, based on Nielsen’s xAOC information. Nielsen’s xAOC is representative of food, drug and mass merchandisers (including Walmart), some club retailers (including Sam’s Club and BJs), some dollar retailers (including Dollar General Family Dollar and Fred’s SuperFamily Dollar) and military. OurBased on sales data for fiscal 2020, Post Consumer Brands’s core brands include the following RTE cereal brands: Honey Bunches of Oats, Pebbles, Great Grains, Grape-Nuts, Honeycomb and Malt-O-Meal branded cereals. Post Consumer Brands’s brand portfolio also includes, among others,the RTE cereal brands include Honey Bunches of Oats, Pebbles, Oreo O’sand Mom’s Best, Great Grains, Grape-Nuts, Post Shredded Wheat, Oh’s, Honeycomb, Golden Crisp, Post Raisin Bran, Alpha-Bits, Shreddies, Malt-O-Meal brandedbagged cerealand Mom’s Best. Ouras well as the hot cereal brands include of Malt-O-Meal Hot Wheathot wheat, CoCo Wheats, Coco Wheats, Better Oats and Mom’s Best Oatmealoatmeal.In addition, Post Consumer Brands also includes the natural and organic RTE cereal and snacking platform in both branded and private label of Weetabix NA, led by the Weetabix and Barbara’s brands, and the Puffins sub-brand, serving the natural and specialty channels and conventional retailers. The Post Consumer Brands business’sBrands’s products are primarily manufactured through a flexible production platform at tennine owned facilities in the United StatesU.S. and Canada.
Cereal and granola products sold by our Post Consumer Brands, Weetabix and the historical Private Brands segments together for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 contributed 37.6%, 37.6% and 36.6%, respectively, to our consolidated revenue.
Weetabix
Our Weetabix segment primarily markets and distributes branded and private label RTE cereal products. According to Nielsen’s ScanTrack data, the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) cereals and breakfast drinks category was approximately £1.5 billion in sales for the 52-week period ended October 31, 2020. Weetabix holds the number two overall position for branded manufacturers in the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) RTE cereal category. ItsU.K. cereals and breakfast drinks category according to Nielsen’s ScanTrack data for the 52-week period ended October 31, 2020. Based on sales data for fiscal 2020, the core brands in Weetabix’s portfolio includesinclude the Weetabix brand, which holds the number one brand position in the U.K. RTE cerealcereals and breakfast drinks category as well as based on Nielsen’s ScanTrack data for the 52-week period ended October 31, 2020, and the Alpen brand (the number one muesli brand in the U.K.) according to Nielsen’s ScanTrack data for the 52-week period ended October 31, 2020). Nielsen’s ScanTrack data is representative of grocery, health and beauty and beverage purchases, collating data from, among others, major grocery stores, independent grocery chains, convenience stores and gas stations. Other brands in Weetabix’s portfolio include Weetos, Weetos, Ready Brek and Weetabix On The Go. ItsWeetabix’s main markets are the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland, where Weetabix has deep relationships with all key retailers and key players in wholesale and foodservice. Weetabix also distributes products to multiple countries throughout the world, mainly through a network of third party distributors in the respective markets. Weetabix also
has a growing business in emerging markets, such as China and Hong Kong, through the eCommerce channel. Additionally, Weetabix has operations in Africa through two joint ventures.
Refrigerated FoodCereal and granola products sold by our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments together contributed 41.9% to our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2020. For additional information regarding our net sales by product, refer to Note 22 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8 of this report.
Foodservice
Through our Refrigerated FoodFoodservice segment, comprised of our legacy Michael Foods businesswe primarily produce and the Bob Evans business acquired in January 2018, we produce and/or distribute egg and potato products sausage, side dishes, cheesein the foodservice and other refrigerated products to retail and foodservice customers. Ourfood ingredient channels. We provide a broad portfolio of egg business produces and distributes numerous products under several brands, with the primary brands being Papetti’s, Easy Eggs, Table Ready, All Whites, Davidson’s Safest Choice, and Abbotsford Farms, Better’n Eggs and Emulsa potato products under several brands, among others. We operate thirteenwith the primary brand being Simply Potatoes; the primary brands were determined based on sales data for fiscal 2020. The Foodservice segment also manufactures certain meat products. Our operations include fourteen egg products production facilities in the United States,U.S., some of which are fully integrated, from the maintenance of laying flocks through the processing of egg products. For fiscal 2018, 2017products, potato processing facilities in Maine, Minnesota, Nevada and 2016, eggOhio, and meat products processing and production facilities in Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio and Texas. Several of these production facilities also produce products for our Refrigerated Retail segment.
Refrigerated Retail
Through our Refrigerated Retail segment, we produce and distribute side dishes, eggs and egg products, contributed 24.6%, 27.1%sausage, cheese and 28.1%, respectively,other dairy and refrigerated products to our consolidated revenue.retail customers. Our refrigerated side dish, potato and sausage products are marketedsold primarily under theBob Evans,Bob Evans Farms,and Simply Potatoes, Pineland Farms, Owens and Diner’s Choice brands; the Refrigerated Food segment maintains processing facilities for these products are located in Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Texas. Our egg products are chiefly sold under the Bob Evans Egg Whites brand, and are produced at facilities located in Minnesota Maine, Michigan, Ohio, Texas and Nevada.New Jersey, as well as several of our egg products production facilities that also produce products for our Foodservice segment. Our cheese and other dairy case products are marketedsold principally under the Crystal Farms brand, and other trademarks include Crescent Valley, Westfield Farms and David’s Deli. We brand. In addition to utilizing third party manufacturers, we operate a facility in Lake Mills, Wisconsin whichthat processes and packages various cheese products for theCrystal Farms brand and for private label customers.
Active NutritionEggs and egg products sold by our Foodservice and Refrigerated Retail segments together contributed 22.9% to our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2020. For additional information regarding our net sales by product, refer to Note 22 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8 of this report.
BellRing Brands
Our Active NutritionBellRing Brands segment markets and distributes ready-to-drinkRTD protein shakes, other RTD beverages, bars, powders and other nutritional supplements undernutrition bars in the convenient nutrition category. BellRing Brands’s primary brands based on fiscal 2020 sales data are Premier Protein, Dymatize,and PowerBar, Supreme Protein and Joint Juice brands.. TheActive NutritionBellRing Brands segment’s products are primarily manufactured under co-manufacturing agreements at various third party facilities located in the United StatesU.S. and Europe. WeBellRing Brands also ownowns a facility in Germany that manufactures bar productsbars and gels primarily for our Active Nutrition brandsthe European Union (the “E.U.”) and private label customers.the U.K. markets. Our Active NutritionBellRing Brands products are primarily sold in the club, food, drug and mass merchandise, grocery, drug,and eCommerce channels, as well as the specialty and convenience stores as well as online. For fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, protein-basedchannels.
Protein-based products and supplements contributed 13.2%, 13.6% and 11.4%, respectively,17.3% to our consolidated revenue.
Private Brands
Our historical Private Brands segment manufactures and distributes private label peanut and other nut butters, dried fruit and nuts, pasta products, premium natural and organic granola, cereals and snacks, withrevenue for fiscal 2020. For additional information regarding our net sales by product, refer to customersNote 22 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in the foodservice, retail and food ingredient channels primarily in the United States and Canada, and also in the European Union and the Middle East. The historical Private Brands business also co-manufactures peanut and other nut butters for national brands, private label retail markets and industrial markets. In addition, the historical Private Brands business provides peanut blanching, granulation and roasting services for the commercial peanut industry. Effective October 1, 2018,Item 8 of this business became an unconsolidated equity investment and is no longer a reportable segment of Post.report.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
Each of our businesses has developed marketing strategies specific to its product lines. For certain of our products, we have consumer-targeted marketing campaigns, which generally include television, digital and print advertisements, coupon offers, rebate programs, co-marketing arrangements with complementary consumer product and entertainment companies and joint advertising with select retail customers. We also generally use traditional outdoor, print and digital advertising and social media, as well as more targeted grass roots programs such as sampling events and business drops, in order to increase brand awareness and loyalty at both national and local levels. Our internet and social media efforts are used to educate consumers about the nutritional value and flavor profiles of our products and for product promotion and consumer entertainment.
Our Post Consumer Brands segment sells products primarily through an internal sales staff and broker organizations. We also sell Post Consumer Brands products to military, e-commerce and foodservice channels and may utilize distribution or similar arrangements for sales of Post Consumer Brands products. Our Weetabix segment services its key U.K. markets through a centralized commercial team which manages relationships with customers at the corporate level while a third party sales force operates at the store level to ensure maximum availability and compliance with agreed plans. Our Refrigerated Food segment aligns itsWeetabix has small sales and marketing efforts by distribution channel, with ateams in the growth markets of Spain, the United Arab Emirates and China, and it also services emerging markets, such as China and Hong Kong, through the eCommerce channel. Our Foodservice and Refrigerated Retail segments sell and market their products primarily through dedicated teamteams of internal
sales staff and broker organizations for each of the commercial and retail channels.organizations. Our Active NutritionBellRing Brands segment uses a flexible sales model that combines a national and international direct sales force, broker network and distributors. Our historical Private Brands segment primarily sells its products through internal sales staff and broker organizations, including a strong broker network that services the natural/specialty and conventional grocery channels.
Generally, our products are distributed through a network of third party common carriers. In addition, our Refrigerated Food segment has anRetail and Foodservice segments have internal fleetfleets that distributesdistribute certain of their products.
Demand for our products is impacted by changes in consumer behaviors and preferences. Since the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the actions of public health and other governmental officials in response to the pandemic, began to impact the categories in which we operate, our products sold through the food, drug and mass, club and eCommerce channels generally experienced an increase in sales as a result of consumer pantry loading in the second quarter of fiscal 2020 and increased at-home consumption that continued throughout the second half of fiscal 2020. However, our foodservice business has been negatively impacted by lower demand resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various channels, including full service restaurants, quick service restaurants, education and travel and lodging. In addition, during the second half of fiscal 2020, we experienced declines in sales of certain on-the-go products as a result of increased at-home consumption. For further discussion regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, refer to “COVID-19 Pandemic” above. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the RTE cereal category in which our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments operate had been experiencing relatively flat to declining demand. In general, our Foodservice business had been growing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our Refrigerated Retail business operates in a category that had been growing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, with such growth accelerating during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our BellRing Brands business operates primarily in the liquids sub-category of the convenient nutrition category, which had been growing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, experienced a brief slowdown early in the COVID-19 pandemic but has since returned to growth relatively in line with its refrigerated retail products.pre-pandemic growth rate. We continue to actively monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our businesses; however, we are unable to accurately predict the future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have due to various uncertainties, including the ultimate geographic spread of the virus, the severity of the virus, the duration of the outbreak, actions that may be taken by governmental authorities and changes in consumer behaviors and preferences.
Research and Development
Our research and development efforts span our business segments. These capabilities extend to ingredients, packaging technologies, product sizes and packaging technologies;delivery formats; new product and process development, as well as analytical support; bench-top and pilot plant capabilities; and research support to operations.
Raw Materials and Energy
Raw materials used in our businesses (purchased from local, regional and international suppliers) consist of ingredients and packaging materials. The principal ingredients for most of our businesses are agricultural commodities, including wheat, oats, rice, corn, other grain products, vegetable oils, drieddairy- and vegetable-based proteins, sugar and other sweeteners, fruit nuts, dairy and soy-based proteins, cocoa, corn syrup and sugar.nuts. Additionally, the principal ingredients for the Foodservice and Refrigerated Food businessRetail businesses are eggs, pork, pasta, potatoes, cheese, milk and butter. A portion of the segment’sour egg needs comes from Company-owned layer hens, and the balance is purchased under third party contracts and in the spot market. We also buy significant amounts of grain to feed layer hens. In addition, we procure live sows at prevailing market prices from terminals, local auctions, country markets and corporate and family farms in various United StatesU.S. locations. Each of our segments utilizeutilizes raw material sources that ensure that its products meet standards and certification requirements, where applicable, for example, non-GMO, organic, gluten-free and/or cage-free. The principal packaging materials used by the Companyour businesses are linerboardfolding cartons, corrugated boxes, plastic containers, flexible and rigid plastic film and containers, beverage packaging, cartonboard, and aseptic foil and plastic lined cartonboard.
Supply availability and prices paid for raw materials can fluctuate widely due to external factors, such as pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of contagious diseases, weather conditions, feed costs, labor disputes, governmentgovernmental programs, regulations and trade and tariff policies, and regulations, industry consolidation, economic climate, energy shortages, transportation delays, commodity market prices, currency fluctuations and other unforeseen circumstances, such as avian influenza and diseases affecting livestock, which could affect the domestic poultry industry and our egg supply and our sow supply, respectively. We continuously monitor worldwide supply and cost trends of these raw materials to enable us to take appropriate action to obtain ingredients and packaging needed for production. Although the prices of the principal raw materials can be expected to fluctuate, we believe such raw materials to be in adequate supply and generally available from numerousmultiple sources.
Cereal processing ovens and most of the Foodservice and Refrigerated FoodRetail production facilities generally are generally fueled by natural gas, or propane, which areis obtained from local utilities or other local suppliers. Electricity and steam (generated in on-site, gas-fired boilers) also are used in our processing facilities. Short-term standby propane storage exists at several plants for use in the event of an interruption
in natural gas supplies. Oil also may be used to fuel certain operations at various plants in the event of natural gas shortages or when its use presents economic advantages. In addition, considerable amounts of diesel fuel are used in connection with the distribution of our products.products, including in our internal fleet. Refrigerated Retail also uses large quantities of carbon dioxide as a cooling agent during its sausage production. Weetabix owns and operates its own combined heat and power generation unit,
which is capable of supplying the majority of the requirements of its main operation site with power and steam andwhich means the site can be operated using either electricity or natural gas or oil.gas.
Trademarks and Intellectual Property
We own or have long-term licenses to use a number of trademarks that are critical to the success of our businesses. Our Post Consumer Brands business’s key trademarks include Post®, Honey Bunches of Oats®, Great Grains®, Post® Bran Flakes, Post® Shredded Wheat, Spoon Size® Shredded Wheat, Golden Crisp®, Alpha-Bits®, Oh's Ohs!®, ShreddiesTM™, Post® Raisin Bran, Grape-Nuts®, Honeycomb®, Frosted Mini Spooners®, Golden Puffs®,Cinnamon Toasters®, Fruity Dyno-Bites®, Cocoa Dyno-Bites®, Berry Colossal Crunch®, Malt-O-Meal®, Farina®™, Dyno-Bites®, MOM’s Mom’s Best®, Better OatsTM®, CoCo WheatsTM®, Weetabix®, Barbara’s® and Puffins®, each of which we own, as well as several trademarks that we license from third parties for use in the United States,U.S., Canada and several other international markets, such as Pebbles™, Oreo O’s®, Nilla®, Nutter Butter®, Chips Ahoy!®, Honeymaid® and HoneymaidDunkin’®. Our Weetabix segment’s key trademarks include Weetabix®, Alpen®, Weetos™, Ready Brek™, Weetabix On The Go™ and Oatibix™®, each of which we own. The key trademarks for the Refrigerated FoodFoodservice business include Papetti’s®, Easy Eggs®, Table Ready®, All Whites®, Davidson’s Safest Choice®,Abbotsford Farms®, Better’n Eggs®, Emulsa®, Crystal Farms®, and Simply Potatoes®, Diner’s Choice®, Crescent Valley®, Westfield Farms®, David’s Deli®, Owens® and Country Creek Farm®, each of which we own, and Just®Egg, which we license for use in North America. The trademarks for the Refrigerated Retail business include Davidson’s Safest Choice®, Abbotsford Farms®, Better’n Eggs®, Crystal Farms®, Simply Potatoes®, Diner’s Choice®, Westfield Farms®, David’s Deli®, Crescent Valley®, Owens® and Country Creek Farm®, each of which we own, and Bob Evans®(which is used in brands such as Bob Evans®Egg Whites), Bob Evans Farms® and Pineland Farms®, which we license for worldwide use. Our Active NutritionBellRing Brands segment’s key trademarks include BellRing®, BellRing Brands®, Premier Protein®, Premier Nutrition®, Dymatize®, ISO.100®, PowerBar®, Joint Juice®, Dymatize®, ISO.100®, and Supreme Protein® and PowerBar®, each of which we own. The key trademarks of our historical Private Brands segment include Attune®, Golden Boy™, Nut ’n Better™, Willamette Valley Granola Company™, Dakota Growers Pasta Co.®, Dreamfields® and Golden Organics®, which, effective October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue directly or indirectly owns. Our owned trademarks are, in most cases, protected through registration in the United StatesU.S. or the U.K., as well as in many other countries where the related products are sold.
We also own several patents in North America and elsewhere. While our patent portfolio as a whole is material to our business, no one patent or group of related patents is material to our business. In addition, we have proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how processes and other intellectual property rights that are not registered.
We rely on a combination of trademark law, copyright law, trade secrets, non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements and provisions in other agreements and other measures to establish and protect our proprietary rights to our products, packaging, processes and intellectual property.
Seasonality
Demand for certain of our products may be influenced by holidays, changes in seasons or other events.events, which may impact customer and consumer spending patterns and the timing of promotional activities. For example, demand for our egg products, potatoes, sausage, side dishes, butter and cheese tends to increase during the Thanksgiving, Christmas, Easter and other holiday seasons, which may result in increased net sales during the first quarterand third quarters of our fiscal year. We also have experienced increased demand for the snacking and baking nuts manufactured and distributed through our historical Private Brands segment during the Thanksgiving, Christmas and holiday seasons. Demand for our Malt-O-Meal hot wheat, Better Oats oatmeal and Ready Brek hot oats cereals also tends to be seasonably skewed towards the colder winter season. Demand for various products in our BellRing Brands business tends to be lower during our first fiscal quarter as a result of the holiday season. However, on a consolidated basis our revenues and results of operations generally are distributed relatively evenly over the quarters of our fiscal year.
Working Capital
A description For a discussion of our working capital practices is included in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section under “Management’s Discussion and Analysisimpact of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report. Cash receipts from goods sold, supplemented as required by borrowings, providethe COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted demand trends for our operating expenses and working capital needs.fiscal 2020, refer to “COVID-19 Pandemic” above.
Customers
We sell Post Consumer Brands products primarily to grocery stores, mass merchandise customers, supercenters, club stores, natural/specialty stores and drug store customers. We also sell toPost Consumer Brands products in the military, e-commerceeCommerce and foodservice channels. Our Weetabix segment’s products are primarily sold to grocery stores, discounters, wholesalers and convenience stores.stores and through eCommerce. Our Refrigerated FoodFoodservice segment’s primary customers include foodservice distributors and national restaurant chains, retailchains. Our Refrigerated Retail segment’s primary customers include grocery stores, mass merchandise customers and major food manufacturers and processors. Our Active NutritionBellRing Brands segment’s customers are predominately club stores, food, drug and mass merchandise customers grocery stores, drug stores, convenience stores and online retailers, and also include specialty retailers, supplement and convenience stores and distributors. Our historical Private Brands segment’s products are sold primarily to the natural/specialty and conventional grocery stores, mass merchandise customers and discount stores and foodservice and food ingredient customers.
Our largest customer, Walmart, accounted for approximately 13%20.9% of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2018.2020. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our fiscal 20182020 consolidated net sales, but certain of our segments depend on sales to large customers. For example, the largest customer of our Post Consumer Brands segment, Walmart, accounted for approximately 29%31.4% of Post Consumer Brands’Brands’s net sales in fiscal 2018.2020. The largest customers of our Weetabix segment, Tesco, Asda, Morrison’sWalmart and Sainsbury’s, accounted for approximately 52%40.1% of Weetabix’s net sales in fiscal 2018.2020. The largest customers of our Foodservice segment, Sysco and US Foods, accounted for 35.8% of the segment’s net sales in fiscal 2020. Additionally, the largest customers of our Refrigerated FoodRetail segment, SyscoWalmart and US Foods,Kroger, accounted for approximately 27%31.7% of the segment’s net sales in fiscal 2018,
2020, and the largest customers of our Active Nutrition business,BellRing Brands segment, Costco and Sam’s Club,Walmart, accounted for approximately 59%67.3% of the Active Nutrition segment’s net sales in fiscal 2018. The largest customer2020. For purposes of our historical Private Brands segment, Whole Foods, accounted for approximately 16%this disclosure, “Walmart” refers to Walmart Inc. and its affiliates, which include Sam’s Club and Asda.
Competition
The consumer food and beverage sportsand convenient nutrition and sports supplement categories in which we operate are highly competitive and highly sensitive to both pricing and promotion. Many of our principal competitors in these categories may have substantially more financial, marketing and other resources. Competition is based on, among other things, brand recognition and loyalty, taste, nutritional value, ingredients, product quality, price, variety, innovation, distribution, packaging, convenience, effective promotional activities and the ability to identify and satisfy dynamic, emerging consumer preferences. Our principal strategies for competing in each of our segments include effective customer relationship management, category insights, superior product quality and food safety, product innovation, an efficient supply chain and competitive pricing. In addition, in many of our product categories, we compete not only with widely advertised branded products, but also with private label and store brand products. The industries in which we operate are expected to remain highly competitive for the foreseeable future.
Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters
We are subject to regulation by federal, state, local and foreign governmental entities and agencies. Our activities in Canada and Europe are subject to regulations similar to those applicable to our business in the United States.U.S. As a producer and distributor of goods for human consumption, our operations must comply with stringent production, storage, distribution, labeling and marketing standards administered by the applicable government entity, namely the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”(the “FDA”) and, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”), the Federal Trade Commission and state and local agencies in the United StatesU.S., as well as similar regulatory agencies in Canada, Mexico, the U.K., the E.U. and the European Union.elsewhere. Products that do not meet regulatory standards may be considered to be adulterated and/or misbranded and subject to recall. Additionally, following the recent adoption of the Food Safety Modernization Act in the U.S. and the Safe Foods for Canadians Act in Canada, the FDA isand the Canadian Food Inspection Agency are implementing additional regulations focused on prevention of food contamination, more frequent inspection of high-risk facilities, increased record-keeping and improved tracing of food.
Certain meategg and eggmeat products produced by our Foodservice and Refrigerated Food segmentRetail segments are under the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”)USDA and its regulations regarding quality, labeling and sanitary control, rather than FDA regulations. The Foodservice and Refrigerated FoodRetail egg processing plants that break eggs, and some of our other meat and egg-processing operations, are currently subject to continuous on-site USDA inspection.inspections and will be subject to newly issued USDA Egg Products Inspections Act regulations starting in 2021. Our other United StatesU.S. facilities are subject to periodic inspectioninspections by the USDA, the FDA and/or state regulatory authorities, such as state departments of agriculture. The pork product manufacturing operations of our Foodservice and Refrigerated Food segmentRetail segments are subject to the Packers &and Stockyards Act, which also is administered by the USDA and which regulates trade practices.
Our facilities, like those of similar businesses, are subject to certain safety regulations, including regulations issued pursuant to the United StatesU.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act and similar regulations in Canada, the U.K. and Germany. These regulations require us to comply with certain manufacturing safety standards to protect our employees from accidents.employees. Further, certain of our Foodservice and Refrigerated Retail operations are subject to laws that mandate specific housing requirements for layer hens and mandate specific space requirements for farm animal enclosures, including layer hens and pigs, which laws may vary on a state to state basis. As a company with international operations, we also are subject to laws, rules and regulations in the U.S. and other countries related to anti-corruption, antitrust and competition and economic sanctions. Additionally, some of the food commoditiesingredients on which our business reliesbusinesses rely are subject to governmental agricultural programs (e.g., subsidies and import/export regulations), which have substantial effects on prices and supplies of these commodities.raw materials.
In addition, our operations are subject to various federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding data privacy, including the European Union’sE.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation, and Privacy Shield, which applyapplies to certain of our businesses and dealdeals with the collection and use of personal information obtained from data subjectsof the European Union.E.U. Our operations also are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations with respect to environmental matters, including air quality, wastewater pretreatment and discharge, storm water, waste handling and disposal and other regulations intended to protect public health and the environment. In the United States,U.S., the laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.Act and California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65). Our foreign facilities are subject to local and national regulations similar to those applicable to us in the United States.U.S. Additionally, Foodservice and Refrigerated FoodRetail layer farms dispose of animal waste primarily by transferring it to farmers for use as fertilizer, and Foodservice and Refrigerated FoodRetail potato product facilities dispose of solid vegetable waste primarily by transferring it to processors who convert it tointo animal feed.
We have made, and will continue to make, expenditures to ensure and enhance environmental compliance. While the impact of compliance with laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently expect that our Refrigerated Retail and Foodservice segments will incur material capital expenditures in future fiscal years to comply with recently enacted state laws regulating housing and space requirements for layer hens.
Human Capital
The Company and its consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries have approximately 11,55010,200 employees as of November 1, 2018,2020, of which approximately 9,3008,380 are in the United States,U.S., approximately 1,0101,040 are in the U.K., approximately 835440 are in Canada and approximately 405340 are located in other jurisdictions. Currently,As of November 1, 2020, approximately 17%16% of such employees arewere unionized. We have entered into several collective bargaining agreements on terms that we believe are typical for the industries in which we operate. Most of the unionized workers at our facilities are represented under contracts which expire at various times throughout the next several years. AsIn general, as these agreements expire, we believe that the agreements can be renegotiated on terms satisfactory to us. Any new collective bargaining agreements could result in changes to our cost structure at the relevant facilities. We believe that overall we have good relationships with employees and their representative organizations. We are currently renegotiating our collective bargaining agreement at our Post Consumer Brands manufacturing plant in Battle Creek, Michigan, which, as of November 1, 2020, covered approximately 500 employees. There is no guarantee that we will reach an agreement in a timely manner, and if an agreement is not reached, there could be an interruption in production at that facility.
Our people are critical to our success. While each of our businesses generally operates autonomously to implement certain strategies with respect to its employees, our organization aligns to provide a safe, rewarding and respectful workplace where our people are provided with opportunities to pursue career paths based on their skills, performance and potential. We adhere to our Code of Conduct, which sets forth a commitment to our stakeholders, including our employees, to operate with integrity and mutual respect. We also incorporate safety principles into every aspect of our business. We have a well-developed environmental, health and safety program, which is reinforced through rigorous policies, education and engagement of our employees and internal and external periodic audits.
Executive OfficersWe strive to recruit, hire and retain a talented and diverse team of people. Our employees are supported with training and development opportunities to pursue their career paths and to ensure compliance with our policies. Our compensation and benefits teams strive to develop and implement policies and programs that support our business goals, maintain competitiveness, promote shared fiscal responsibility among the Company and our employees, strategically align talent within our organization and reward performance, while also managing the costs of such policies and programs. We provide our employees with competitive fixed and/or variable pay, and for eligible employees we currently provide access to medical, dental and life insurance benefits, disability coverage, 401(k) plans or programs and employee assistance programs, among other benefits, through our Total Rewards program.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, our commitment to our employees has been put into action. One of the Registrantprinciples that has guided and continues to guide our decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic is to safeguard the health of our employees, including their economic health. Steps we have taken include deep cleaning our facilities, providing personal protective equipment to our manufacturing employees, installing plexi-glass, where possible, in our manufacturing facilities, encouraging hygiene practices advised by health authorities, restricting business travel and site visitors and implementing remote working for certain office employees when practicable. We engaged third party service providers to provide on-the-ground nurses, testing and protection to our employees. We continue to enhance our practices to remain aligned with federal, state, local and international regulations and guidelines. In addition, we have paid special bonuses and incentives to many of our manufacturing employees across several of our businesses, in recognition of their outstanding service during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we extended COVID-19 protection pay for employees who were quarantined, sick or needed to provide care for their families. Further, despite the negative impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on our Foodservice business, we have not cut salaries or hourly rates for employees in the Foodservice business, we continued to maintain the shifts for our Foodservice hourly workers at thirty-two hours per week, ensuring that their benefits coverage would continue, and although we made the difficult decision to make necessary hour reductions and targeted furloughs at some points, all employees furloughed in fiscal 2020 have returned to full employment.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge, through our website (www.postholdings.com) reports we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our annual reports on Forms 10-K, quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q, current reports on Forms 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site containing these reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct and the charters of the Audit and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees of our Board of Directors also are available on our website, where they can be printed free of charge. All of these documents also are available to shareholders at no charge upon request sent to our corporate secretary (2503 S. Hanley Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63144, Telephone: 314-644-7600). The information and other content contained on our website are not part of (or incorporated by reference in) this report or any other document we file with the SEC.
Information about our Executive Officers
The section below provides information regarding our executive officers as of November 12, 2018:1, 2020:
Robert V. Vitale, age 52,54, has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2014 and serves as our principal executive officer. Mr. Vitale also has been a member of our Board of Directors since November 2014. Previously, Mr. Vitale served as our Chief Financial Officer from October 2011 until November 2014. He previouslyMr. Vitale served as Presidentpresident and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of AHM Financial Group, LLC, a diversified provider of insurance brokerage and wealth management services, from 2006 until 2011 and previously was a partner of Westgate Equity Partners, LLC, a consumer-oriented private equity firm. Mr. Vitale has been the executive chairman of BellRing, our publicly-traded subsidiary that manufactures products in the convenient nutrition category through its operating subsidiaries, since September 2019, and is a member of the board of directors of 8th Avenue. Mr. Vitale also serves on the board of directors of Energizer Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded manufacturer and distributor of primary batteries, portable lighting products and automotive appearance, performance, refrigerant and fragrance products.
Jeff A. Zadoks, age 53,55, has served as an Executive Vice President since November 2017 and as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2014, and serves as the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer.2014. Mr. Zadoks previously served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from November 2014 until November 2017. Mr. Zadoks served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from January 2014 until November 2014, and as our Corporate Controller from October 2011 until November 2014. Prior to joining Post, Mr. Zadoks served as Senior Vice Presidentsenior vice president and Chief Accounting Officerchief accounting officer at RehabCare Group, Inc., a leading provider of post-acute care in hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, from February 2010 to September 2011, and as Vice Presidentvice president and Corporate Controllercorporate controller of RehabCare Group from December 2003 until January 2010.
Howard A. Friedman, age 48,50, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer, Post Consumer Brands since July 2018. Mr. Friedman previously served as the Executive Vice Presidentexecutive vice president of the refrigerated meat and dairy business at The Kraft Heinz Company, a global food and beverage company, where he spent the majority of his more than twenty-year career.
Diedre J. Gray, age 40,42, has served as an Executive Vice President since November 2017 and as our General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer since November 2014. She has served as our Corporate Secretary since January 2012. Ms. Gray previously served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer from November 2014 until November 2017. Ms. Gray served as our Senior Vice President-Legal starting in December 2011 and was promoted to Senior Vice President, General Counsel in September 2012. Prior to joining Post, Ms. Gray served as Associate General Counselassociate general counsel and Assistant Secretaryassistant secretary at MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (now SunEdison, Inc.), a semiconductor and solar wafer manufacturing company, from 2010 to 2014.2011. Previously, Ms. Gray was an attorney at Bryan Cave LLP (now Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP) from 2003 to 2010.
Mark W. Westphal, age 53,55, has served as President, Foodservice (formerly known as Michael FoodsFoods) since January 2018. Mr. Westphal previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Michael Foods for nearly ten years. Prior to joining Michael Foods in 1995, Mr. Westphal worked for Grant Thornton LLP, an audit, tax and advisory firm.
We make available, free
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this report, the following risks and uncertainties, some of which have occurred and any of which may occur in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Business
Operating Risks
Global health developments and economic uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted, and are expected to continue to impact, our financial and operational performance.
The public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures being taken by governments, businesses, including us, and the public at large to limit the spread of COVID-19 have had, and we expect will continue to have, certain impacts on our financial and operational performance, including the following:
•Deteriorating economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, including economic slowdowns or recessions or significant disruptions in financial markets, could limit our ability to satisfy our debt obligations or impact the cost or availability of additional capital. As of September 30, 2020, we had $7,049.7 million in aggregate principal amount of debt and $1,187.9 million in cash and cash equivalents.
•We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, reduced demand for our foodservice and certain on-the-go products due to reduced consumer traffic in restaurants, schools and other locations resulting from permanent and temporary customer closures, shelter-in-place regulations or recommendations and changes in consumer behavior in response to the pandemic. Due to such reduced demand, during fiscal 2020, we temporarily idled certain of our facilities and delivered contract suspension notices to certain of our suppliers, invoking force majeure clauses, which have since been provisionally lifted, and we could become a party to litigation to enforce these force majeure clauses or otherwise enforce our rights under the Uniform Commercial Code. If the COVID-19 pandemic persists or intensifies, its negative impacts on demand for our foodservice or on-the-go products could be more prolonged and may become more severe, and we may in the future need to take similar or more aggressive actions.
•We have experienced, and could continue to experience, temporary workforce or other disruptions in our supply chain as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased employee absenteeism, which has negatively impacted and could continue to negatively impact our ability to deliver our products. We have implemented employee safety measures at our manufacturing facilities, but these measures may not be sufficient to prevent the spread of COVID-19 among our employees or protect against other impacts resulting from COVID-19. We have had, and may have future needs, to temporarily close individual production lines or entire manufacturing facilities either due to a widespread employee outbreak, sanitizings or related operational interruptions or for other reasons related to COVID-19.
•The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our and our third party manufacturers’ operations has included, and could in the future include, increases in the cost or reductions in the availability of ingredients, packaging and other materials used to manufacture our products and has resulted in, and could result in additional, interruptions in our supply chain.
•We have incurred, and may continue to incur, increased operating costs, including facility reconfiguration costs to enhance social distancing, purchases of equipment and supplies that are in high demand, costs to engage third party resources and costs for employee health screenings and facility sanitizings, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the evolving understanding of the science and best practices. In addition, we have incurred, and may continue to incur, additional expenses to comply with new requirements imposed by governmental authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
•Changes and volatility in consumer purchasing and consumption patterns may increase demand for our products in one quarter (such as occurred for certain of our retail products in the second quarter of fiscal 2020 and continued through the second half of fiscal 2020), which in certain cases has exceeded and could continue to exceed our production capacity or otherwise strain our supply chain. Further, while we experienced increased demand for certain of our retail products in the second quarter of fiscal 2020 that continued through the second half of fiscal 2020, this increase may moderate or reverse in future periods if consumers alter their purchasing habits. Consumer perceptions of our Company’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and any perceived quality or health concerns (whether or not valid) regarding our products, could affect our brand value.
•Significant policy changes in markets in which we manufacture, sell or distribute our products (including quarantines, import or export restrictions, price controls, governmental or regulatory actions, closures or other restrictions) could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
•Actions we have taken or may take, or decisions we have made or may make, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may result in investigations, legal claims or litigation against us.
•Continued business disruptions and uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic for a sustained period of time could result in additional delays or modifications to our strategic plans and other initiatives and hinder our ability to achieve anticipated cost savings and productivity initiatives on planned timelines.
These and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened, or in some cases manifested, other risks set forth below, any of which could have a material effect on us. This situation is changing rapidly and additional impacts may arise that we are not aware of as of the date hereof. The extent and potential short and long term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, which could be material, will depend on future developments, including the duration, severity and spread of the pandemic, actions that have and may be taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic, changing consumer behaviors and the impact on our supply chain, operations, workforce and the financial markets, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
We operate in categories with strong competition.
The consumer food and beverage sportsand convenient nutrition and sports supplement categories are highly competitive. Competition in these categories is based on, among other things, brand recognition and loyalty, taste, nutritional value, ingredients, product quality, price, product availability, variety, innovation, distribution, packaging, convenience, effective promotional activities and the ability to identify and satisfy dynamic, emerging consumer preferences. Our competitors may have substantial financial, marketing and other resources. Increased competition can reduce our sales due to loss of market share or the need to reduce prices to respond to competitive and customer pressures. Competitive and customer pressures, as well as industry supply and market demand, also may limit our ability to increase prices, including in response to cost increases. In most product categories, we compete not only with widely advertised branded products, but also with private label and store brand products. A strong competitive response from one or more of our competitors to our marketplace efforts, or a shift in consumer preferences to competitors’ products, could result in us reducing prices, increasing marketing or other expenditures or losing market share. Our profits could decrease if a reduction in prices or increased costs are not counterbalanced with increased sales volume. In addition, our competitors are increasingly using social media networks and digital platforms to advertise products. If we are unable to compete in this environment and use social media and digital platforms effectively, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We must identify changing consumer and customer preferences and behaviors and develop and offer products to meet these preferences.preferences and behaviors.
Consumer and customer preferences and behaviors evolve over time.time due to a variety of factors. The success of our productsbusiness depends on our ability to identify these changing preferences and behaviors and to continue to develop and offer products that appeal to consumers and customers.customers through the sales channels that they prefer. Consumer preference and behavior changes include dietary trends, attention to different nutritional aspects of foods and beverages, consumer at-home and on-the-go consumption patterns, preferences for certain sales channels, such as eCommerce, concerns regarding the health effects of certain foods and beverages, attention to sourcing practices relating to ingredients, and animal welfare concerns.concerns, environmental concerns regarding packaging and attention to other social and governance aspects of our Company and operations. Any significant changes in consumer or customer preferences orand behaviors and our inability to anticipate or react to such changes could result in reduced demand for our products, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
During the second quarter and continuing throughout the second half of fiscal 2020, our products sold through the food, drug and mass, club and eCommerce channels experienced an increase in sales as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, while our foodservice product sales were negatively impacted by lower demand resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various channels. In addition, during the second half of fiscal 2020, we experienced declines in sales of certain on-the-go products as a result of increased at-home consumption. If these trends continue into the future and we are unable to adapt our business in response to these consumer behaviors, or if these trends are temporary and we fail to quickly respond as they moderate or reverse, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely impacted. In addition, consumers are increasingly shopping through eCommerce websites and mobile commerce applications, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this trend is significantly altering the retail landscape in many of our markets. If we are unable to effectively compete in the expanding eCommerce market or develop the data analytics capabilities needed to generate actionable commercial insights, our business performance may be impacted, which may negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our Foodservice and Refrigerated Food business isRetail businesses are, and will continue to be, affected by changing preferences and requirements as to the housing of egg-laying hens.hens, as well as certain other farm animals. Many restaurant chains, foodservice companies and grocery chains have announced goals to transition to a cage-free egg supply, as well as goals for other farm animal initiatives, by specified future dates. Meeting anticipated customer demand has resulted, and will continue to result, in
additional operating and capital costs to procure cage-free eggs, to modify existing layer facilities and to construct new cage-free layer housing. In addition, several states have enacted, or are proposing, provisions providing for specific requirements for the housing of certain farm animals, which we expect will require us to incur additional operating and capital costs in the future. Also, our retail businesses are, and will continue to be, affected by changing preferences and requirements as to the environmental impact of food packaging. Several of our customers have announced goals to transition to recyclable, compostable or reusable packaging. These changing preferences alsoand requirements could require us to use specially sourced ingredients and packaging types that may be more difficult to source or entail a higher cost or incremental capital investment which we may not be able to pass on to customers.
Our results may be adversely impacted if consumers do not maintain favorable perceptions of our brands.
Maintaining and continually enhancing the value of our brands is critical to the success of our business. Brand value is based in large part on consumer perceptions. Success in promoting and enhancing brand value depends in large part on our ability to provide high-quality products. Brand value could diminish significantly due to a number of factors, including adverse publicity about us, our business practices, products, packaging or ingredients (whether or not valid), our failure to maintain the quality of our products, the failure of our products to deliver consistently positive consumer experiences, concerns about food safety, real or perceived health concerns regarding our products, our products becoming unavailable to consumers or consumer perception that we have acted in an irresponsible manner. In addition, negative perceptions of the food and beverage industry as a whole, or segments of the food and beverage industry in which we operate, may heighten attention from consumers, third parties, the media, governments, shareholders and other stakeholders to such factors and could adversely affect our brand image. Such pressures also could lead to stricter regulations, industry self-regulation that is unevenly adopted among companies and increased focus on food marketing practices. Consumer demand for our products also may be impacted by changes in the level of advertising or promotional support. The growing use of social and digital media by consumers, us and third parties increases the speed and extent that information or misinformation and opinions can be shared. Negative posts or comments about us, our business practices, brands, products, ingredients, packaging, suppliers or packagingthird party manufacturers or the food and beverage industry generally (whether or not valid) in the media, especially on social or digital media, could seriously damage our brands and reputation. Further, third parties may sell counterfeit or imitation versions of our products that are inferior or pose safety risks. If consumers confuse these counterfeit products for our products or have a bad experience with the counterfeit brand, they might refrain from purchasing our brands in the future, which could harm our brand image and sales. If we do not maintain favorable perceptions of our brands, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
We will be subject to a number of uncertainties while we pursue the initial public offering of our Active Nutrition business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.
While we have announced our intention to pursue an initial public offering of our Active Nutrition business, there is no assurance that we will be able to consummate such transaction on favorable termsUncertain or at all. If we are unable to consummate such transaction on favorable terms or at all, we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from our shareholders and employees. In addition, in the event that we are able to consummate such transaction, there is no assurance that we will realize the anticipated value from such transaction. In addition, we and our Active Nutrition business will be required to devote significant management and employee attention and resources to matters relating to the initial public offering. These matters have the potential to disrupt both us and the Active Nutrition business from conducting business operations and could adversely affect the business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of us and our Active Nutrition business. The Active Nutrition business also could lose key employeesunfavorable economic conditions, including as a result of the transaction.COVID-19 pandemic, could limit consumer and customer demand for our products or otherwise adversely affect us.
Our business strategyThe willingness of consumers to purchase our products depends in part on us identifyinggeneral or local economic conditions and completing additional acquisitions and other strategic transactions. Weconsumers’ discretionary spending habits. In periods of adverse or uncertain economic conditions, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers may notpurchase less of our products or may forgo certain purchases altogether. In addition, our customers may seek to reduce their inventories in response to those economic conditions. In those circumstances, we could experience a reduction in sales of our products. Also, as a result of economic conditions or competitive actions, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may be ableunable to successfully consummate favorable strategic transactions inraise our prices sufficiently to protect profit margins. Further, uncertain or unfavorable economic conditions, including as a result of the future. Our corporate development activities also mayCOVID-19 pandemic, could negatively impact the financial stability of our customers or suppliers, which could lead to increased uncollectible receivables or non-performance. Any of these events could have an adverse impacteffect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
AlthoughDisruption of our supply chain, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and changes in weather conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In coordination with our suppliers, business partners and third party manufacturers, our ability to make, move and sell products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our collective supply, manufacturing or distribution capabilities resulting from pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic) or other outbreaks of contagious diseases, governmental restrictions or mandates, border closures, weather, freight carrier availability, any potential effects of climate change, natural disasters, agricultural diseases, fires or evacuations related thereto, explosions, cyber-attacks, terrorism, strikes or other labor unrest, repairs or enhancements at our facilities or other reasons could impair our ability to source inputs or manufacture, sell or timely deliver our products. Changes in weather conditions, agricultural diseases and natural disasters also may affect the cost and supply of commodities and manufacturing materials, including grains, eggs, sows, potatoes, cheese, proteins and sugar and other sweeteners, or result in lower recoveries of usable raw materials. Competitors can be affected differently by any of these events depending on the location of their suppliers and operations. Failure to take adequate steps to reduce the likelihood or mitigate the potential impact of any of these events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a commodity or raw material is sourced from a single location, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and require additional resources to restore our supply chain.
In addition, the manufacturing capabilities for certain of our products are concentrated with certain third party manufacturers and at certain of our and our third party manufacturers’ facilities. If we continuously evaluate strategic transactions,had to close or limit production of all or part of the operations at one or more of such facilities for any reason, or if certain of our facilities or such third party manufacturers were unable to produce our desired quantities, we may be unable to identify suitable strategic transactionsincrease production at our other facilities or with other third party manufacturers in a timely manner, which could adversely affect our customer relationships, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As previously discussed, during fiscal 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted, and we expect will continue to impact, our operations, including temporary workforce disruptions and other disruptions in our supply chain. The increased demand for certain of our retail products during the COVID-19 pandemic has in certain cases exceeded our production capacity and could continue to do so in the future or otherwise strain our supply chain. We continue to actively monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our supply chain and operations; however, we are unable to accurately predict the future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have due to various uncertainties, including the ultimate geographic spread of the virus, the severity of the virus, the duration of the outbreak, actions that may be taken by governmental authorities and changes in consumer behaviors.
We are currently dependent upon third party suppliers and manufacturers for the manufacturing of many of our products. Our business could suffer as a result of a third party’s inability to supply materials for our products or produce our products for us on time or to our specifications.
Our business relies on independent third parties for the supply of materials for, and the manufacture of, many products, such as RTD protein shakes, protein bars and powders, nutritional supplements, breakfast drinks, certain cereal and granola products, shell eggs, dairy products, potatoes and certain refrigerated food products. Our business could be materially affected if we fail to develop or maintain our relationships with these third parties, if these third parties fail to comply with governmental regulations applicable to the manufacturing of our products or if any of these third parties ceases doing business with us or goes out of business. Additionally, we cannot be certain that we will not experience operational difficulties with these third parties, such as increases in costs, reductions in the availability of materials or production capacity, errors in complying with specifications, insufficient quality control and failures to meet production or shipment deadlines, including as a result of pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) or other outbreaks of contagious diseases. The inability of a third party supplier or manufacturer to ship orders in a timely manner or in desirable quantities or to meet our safety, quality and social compliance standards or regulatory requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Certain of our relationships with these third party manufacturers and suppliers are subject to minimum volume commitments, whereby the third party manufacturer has committed to produce, and we have committed to purchase, a minimum quantity of product and the third party supplier has committed to provide, and we have committed to purchase, a minimum quantity of materials, respectively. Despite these commitments, we may nonetheless experience situations where such third parties are unable to fulfill their obligations under our agreements or cannot produce or supply, as applicable, adequate amounts to allow us to meet customer demands. For example, due to a combination of better than expected volume growth for our Premier Protein RTD shakes in the second half of fiscal 2018 and delays in planned incremental production capacity by our third party contract manufacturer network, customer demand for Premier Protein RTD shakes exceeded available capacity and resulted in inventory of our Premier Protein RTD shakes below acceptable levels at September 30, 2018. Alternately, we could incur penalties if we do not purchase the minimum quantities provided under these commitments. In addition, certain of our relationships with these third party manufacturers and suppliers are not subject to supply commitments, and we may not be able to enter intoobtain such transactionscommitments in a timely manner or at favorable prices. Alternatively, we mayall. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our third party manufacturers’ operations combined with a lack of contractual commitments has resulted in the future enter into additional strategic transactions, and anycontinues to result in shortages in certain of our Crystal Farms products.
Increased input costs, including costs for freight, raw materials, energy and other supplies, or limited availability of such transactioninputs could happen at any time, could be material tonegatively impact our business, and could take any number of forms, including, for example, an acquisition, investment or merger, for cash or in exchange for our equity securities, or a divestiture.
Evaluating potential transactions, including divestitures, requires additional expenditures (including legal, accounting and due diligence expenses, higher administrative costs to support the acquired entities and information technology, personnel and other integration expenses) and may divert the attention of our management from ordinary operating matters.
Our corporate development activities also may present financial and operational risks and may have adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers. In addition, future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities and/or amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets and increased operating expenses, all of which could singly or collectively adversely affect ourcondition, results of operations financial condition and cash flows.
We may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of the Bob Evans acquisition.
The acquisition of Bob Evans has involved the combination of two companies that have historically operated independently. In order to realize the anticipated benefits of the Bob Evans acquisition, we have been and will continue to be required to devote significant management attention and resources to aligning the business practices, cultures and operations of each business. We may encounter difficulties as we continue align these businesses in a manner that permits us to achieve the synergies and other benefits anticipated to result from the acquisition. Accordingly, the contemplated benefits of the Bob Evans acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.
We may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of the Weetabix Group acquisition.
The acquisition of the Weetabix Group has involved the combination of two companies that have historically operated independently. In order to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, we will be required to continue to devote significant management attention and resources to aligning the business practices, cultures and operations of each business, in particular, our Post Consumer Brands business and Weetabix NA’s business operations. We may encounter difficulties as we continue align these businesses in a manner that permits us to achieve the synergies and other benefits anticipated to result from the acquisition. Accordingly, the contemplated benefits of the Weetabix Group acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.
We may experience difficulties in integrating acquired businesses, or acquisitions may not perform as expected.
We have acquired multiple businesses, and we may continue to acquire other businesses. The successful integration of these acquisitions depends on our ability to manage the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses. Integrating operations is complex and requires significant efforts and expenses on the part of both us and the acquired businesses. Potential difficulties we may encounter as part of the integration process include, but are not limited to, the following:
employees may voluntarily or involuntarily separate employment from us or the acquired businesses because of the acquisitions;
our management may have its attention diverted while trying to integrate the acquired businesses;
we may encounter obstacles when incorporating the acquired businesses into our operations and management, including integrating or separating personnel, financial systems, operating procedures, regulatory compliance programs, technology, networks and other assets in a seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies;
differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies;
integration may be more costly, more time consuming and complex or less effective than anticipated;
inability to maintain uniform standards, controls and procedures; and
we may discover previously undetected operational or other issues, such as fraud.
Any of these factors could adversely affect our and the acquired businesses’ ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies.
In addition, the success of these acquired businesses will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies through the successful integration of the businesses we acquire with our existing businesses. Even if we are successful in integrating acquired businesses, we cannot assure you that these integrations will result in the realization of the full benefit of any anticipated growth opportunities or cost synergies or that these benefits will be realized within the expected time frames. In addition, acquired businesses may have unanticipated liabilities or contingencies.
Higher freight costs, commodity price volatility and availability and higher energy costs could negatively impact profits.
Our freight costs may increase due to factors such as increased fuel costs, limited carrier availability, increased compliance costs associated with new or changing government regulations, pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of contagious diseases and inflation. The primary commoditiesingredients used by our businessesbusiness include wheat, oats, rice, corn, other grain products, eggs, sows,pork, pasta, potatoes, cheese, milk, butter, vegetable oils, drieddairy- and vegetable-based proteins, sugar and other sweeteners, fruit nuts, dairy and soy-based proteins, cocoa, corn syrup and sugar.nuts. The supply and price of these ingredients are subject to market conditions and are influencedimpacted by many factors beyond our control, including pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of contagious diseases, animal feed costs, weather patterns affecting ingredient production, governmental programs, regulations and regulations,trade and tariff policies, insects, plant diseases and inflation. Our primary packaging materials include linerboardfolding cartons, corrugated boxes, plastic containers, flexible and rigid plastic film and containers,beverage packaging, cartonboard, and aseptic foil and plastic lined cartonboard. In addition, our manufacturing operations use large quantities of natural gas, propane, electricity, carbon dioxide, sanitizing supplies and electricity.personal protective equipment. The cost of such commoditiesthese inputs may fluctuate widely, and we may experience shortages in commoditysuch items as a result of commodity availability, increased demand, pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of
contagious diseases, weather conditions and natural disasters, as well as other factors outside of our control. Higher prices for natural gas, propane, electricity and fuel also may increase our ingredient, production and delivery costs. The
During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced volatility in the prices chargedof raw materials, energy and other supplies. In addition, we have been experiencing shortages of carbon dioxide used by our Refrigerated Retail business as a cooling agent during sausage production, which has resulted in us paying increased costs for our products may not reflect changes in our freight, commoditythis input and energy costs at the time they occur or at all. Accordingly, changes in freight, commodity or energy costs may limitimpacted our ability to maintain existing marginsproduce products and could continue to do so in the future. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we also have incurred, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, resultscontinue to incur, additional costs, including costs for facility reconfigurations to enhance social distancing, personal protective equipment, employee health screenings and facility sanitizings and to secure sources of operations and cash flows. If we fail to hedge and prices subsequently increase, or if we institute a hedge and prices subsequently decrease, our costs may be greater than anticipated or greater than our competitors’ costs, and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.alternate supply for certain inputs.
Our Foodservice and Refrigerated Food segment’sRetail segments’ operating results are significantly affected by egg, sow, potato and cheese prices and the prices of corn and soybean meal, which are the primary grains fed to laying hens. Historically, the prices of these raw materials have fluctuated widely.widely, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, our Refrigerated FoodRetail segment’s cheese and butter products are affected by milk price supports established by the USDA.USDA or government inventory purchasing programs. Although steps can be taken to mitigate the effects of changes in raw material costs, fluctuations in prices are outside of our control, and changes in the price of such items may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Certain supply and demand disruptions, such as those resulting from diseases affecting livestock and those experienced with the 2013 PEDV swine outbreak and the 2015 avian influenza outbreak, could create an inability to keep selling prices in line with input costs and may result in significant fluctuations in operating profit margins.
Impairment in the carrying value of intangible assets could negatively impactThe prices charged for our financial condition and results of operations. If our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we will be required to record additional impairment charges, whichproducts may be significant.
Our balance sheet includes a significant amount of intangible assets, including goodwill, trademarks, trade names and other acquired intangibles. Intangibles and goodwill expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, but our management reviews them for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events orreflect changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may be impaired. Impairments to intangible assets may be caused by factors outside of our control, such as increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates,input costs at the time they occur or at all. Accordingly, changes in industry EBITDAinput costs may limit our ability to maintain existing margins and revenue multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest rates, etc.) or the bankruptcy of a significant customer. These factors, along with other internal and external factors, couldmay have a significant negative impactmaterial adverse effect on our fair value determination, which could then result in a material impairment charge in our results of operations. In fiscal 2018, we had an impairment of other intangible assets and no impairment of goodwill. In fiscal 2017, we had an impairment of goodwill and no impairment of other intangible assets. In fiscal 2016, we had no impairments of goodwill or other intangible assets. We could have additional impairments in the future. See further discussion of these impairments in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report and Notes 2 and 7 within the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in this report.
Unsuccessful implementation of business, strategies to reduce costs may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Many While we try to manage the impact of increases in certain of these costs by locking in prices on quantities required to meet our anticipated production requirements, if we fail, or are unable, to hedge and prices subsequently increase, or if we institute a hedge and prices subsequently decrease, our costs such as raw materials, energy and freight, are outside ofmay be greater than anticipated or greater than our control. Therefore, we must seek to reduce costs in other areas, such as through operating efficiency. If we are not able to complete projects designed to reducecompetitors’ costs, and increase operating efficiency on time or within budget, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows maycould be adversely impacted.affected.
We may not be able to operate successfully if we are unable to recruit, hire, retain and develop key personnel and a qualified and diverse workforce. In addition, we are dependent upon our employees being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness (such as COVID-19).
We depend upon the skills, working relationships and continued services of key personnel, including our senior management team. In addition, our ability to achieve our operating goals depends upon our ability to recruit, hire, retain and develop qualified and diverse personnel to operate and expand our business. We compete with other companies both within and outside of our industry for talented personnel. If we lose key personnel, or one or more members of our senior management team, and we fail to develop adequate succession plans, or if the cost-saving initiatives we have implemented, or any future cost-saving initiatives, do not generate the expected cost savingsfail to hire, retain and synergies,develop qualified and diverse employees, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows maycould be adversely affected.harmed.
Economic downturns could limit consumer demandOur business is dependent upon our employees being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness. If we experience periods where our products.
The willingness of consumersemployees are unable to purchase our products depends in part on general or local economic conditions. In periods of economic uncertainty, consumers may purchase less of our products or may forgo certain purchases altogether. In those circumstances, we could experience a reduction in sales of our products. In addition,perform their jobs for any reason, including as a result of economic conditions or competitive actions, we may be unable to raiseillness (such as COVID-19), our prices sufficiently to protect profit margins. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on ourbusiness, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.flows could be adversely affected. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have experienced temporary workforce disruptions and periods where we temporarily closed manufacturing lines or partial facilities. These events, or if similar events occur in the future, could have a material adverse impact on us in the future.
If our products become adulterated or contaminated, or if they are misbranded or mislabeled, or become contaminated, we might need to recall or withdraw those items and may experience product liability claims if consumers are injured.
Selling food products, beverages and nutritional supplements involves a number of legal and other risks, including contamination, spoilage, degradation, tampering, mislabeling or other adulteration. Additionally, many of the raw materialsingredients used to make certain of our products, particularly eggs, pork, nuts, raw potatoes grains and nuts,grains, are vulnerable to contamination by naturally occurring molds and pathogens, such as salmonella. These pathogens may survive in our products as a result of improper handling by customers or consumers. We do not have control over handling procedures once our products have been shipped for distribution. We may need to recall, withdraw or withdrawisolate some or all of our products if they become damaged, adulterated, mislabeled or misbranded, whether caused by us or someone in our supply chain. A recall or withdrawalSuch an incident could result in destruction of product ingredients and inventory, negative publicity, temporary plant closings, supply chain interruption, substantial costs of compliance or remediation, fines and increased scrutiny by federal, state and foreign regulatory agencies. New scientific discoveries regarding microbes and food manufacturing may bring additional risks and latent liability. Should consumption of any product cause injury, we may be liable for monetary damages as a result of a judgment against us. In addition, adverse publicity, including claims, whether or not valid, that our products or ingredients are unsafe or of poor quality, may discourage consumers or customers from buying our products or cause production and delivery disruptions. Any of these events, including a
significant product liability claim against us, could result in a loss of consumer or customer confidence in our food products.products and damage our brands. Although we have various insurance programs in place, any of these events and/or a loss of consumer or customer confidence could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Violations of laws or regulations, as well as new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations, could adversely affect our business.
The food industry is subject to a variety of federal, state and foreign laws and regulations, including requirements related to food safety, quality, manufacturing, processing, storage, marketing, advertising, labeling and distribution, as well as those related to worker health and workplace safety. Our activities, both inside and outside of the United States, are subject to extensive regulation. In the United States, we are regulated by, or our activities are affected by, among other federal and state authorities and regulations, the FDA, the USDA, the Federal Trade Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65). In Europe, we are regulated by, among other authorities, the U.K.’s Food Standards Agency, Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Environmental Health Officers and Trading Standards Officers and their equivalents in other European Union member states. We also are regulated by similar authorities elsewhere in the world. Governmental regulations also affect taxes and levies, healthcare costs, energy usage and immigration and labor issues, any or all of which may have a direct or indirect effect on our business or the businesses of our customers or suppliers. In addition, we could be the target of claims relating to alleged false or deceptive advertising under federal, state and foreign laws and regulations and may be subject to initiatives to limit or prohibit the marketing and advertising of our products to children.
The impact of current laws and regulations, changes in these laws or regulations or the introduction of new laws or regulations could increase the costs of doing business for us or our customers or suppliers, causing our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to be adversely affected. As specific examples, some states have passed laws that mandate specific housing requirements for layer hens and mandate specific space requirements for farm animal enclosures, including layer hens and pigs. Further, if we are found to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations in these areas, we could be subject to civil remedies, including fines, revocations of required licenses, injunctions or recalls, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We continue to examine the impact that the enacted tax reform legislation, commonly referred to as the United States Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, may have on our business or our future results of operations, profitability, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, the United States, Canada and Mexico have renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement. Impacts of the changes brought about by the new agreement, named the United States, Mexico, Canada Agreement (the “USMCA”), for which the language has not yet been finalized, are not currently known. However, given the integrated nature of our North American operations and supply chain, we continue to monitor closely the status and implementation of the USMCA.
Certain of our Active Nutrition and Refrigerated Food products are subject to a higher level of regulatory scrutiny, resulting in increased costs of operations and the potential for delays in product sales.
Some of our Active Nutrition products are regulated by the FDA as dietary supplements, which are subject to different FDA regulations and levels of regulatory scrutiny. Certain of our Refrigerated Food’s meat and egg products are subject to continuous on-site inspections by the USDA. It also is possible that federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take regulatory or enforcement action, which could result in significant fines or penalties. If we are found to be significantly out of compliance, an
enforcement authority could issue a warning letter and/or institute enforcement actions that could result in additional costs, substantial delays in production or even a temporary shutdown in manufacturing and product sales while the non-conformances are rectified. Also, we may have to recall product or otherwise remove product from the market, and temporarily cease its manufacture and distribution, which would increase our costs and reduce our revenues. Any product liability claims resulting from the failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations would be expensive to defend and could result in substantial damage awards against us or harm our reputation. Any of these events would negatively impact our revenues and costs of operations.
Lossloss of, a significant reduction of purchases by or the bankruptcy of a major customer may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A limited number of customer accounts represents a large percentage of our consolidated net sales. Our largest customer, Walmart, accounted for approximately 13%20.9% of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2018.2020. Walmart also is the largest customer of our Post Consumer Brands segment, accounting for approximately 29%31.4% of Post Consumer Brands’Brands’s net sales in fiscal 2018.2020. The largest customers of our Weetabix segment, Tesco, Asda, Morrison’sWalmart and Sainsbury’s, accounted for approximately 52%40.1% of Weetabix’s net sales in fiscal 2018.2020. The largest customers of our Foodservice segment, Sysco and US Foods, accounted for 35.8% of the segment’s net sales in fiscal 2020. Additionally, the largest customers of our Refrigerated FoodRetail segment, SyscoWalmart and US Foods,Kroger, accounted for approximately 27%31.7% of itsthe segment’s net sales in fiscal 2018,2020, and the largest customers of our Active NutritionBellRing Brands segment, Costco and Sam’s Club,Walmart, accounted for approximately 59%67.3% of the Active Nutrition segment’s net sales in fiscal 2018. The largest customer2020. For purposes of our historical Private Brands segment, Whole Foods, accounted for approximately 16% of Private Brands’ net sales in fiscal 2018.this risk factor, “Walmart” refers to Walmart Inc. and its affiliates, which include Sam’s Club and Asda.
The success of our businessesbusiness depends, in part, on our ability to maintain our level of sales and product distribution through high-volume food distributors, retailers, club stores, super centerssupercenters and mass merchandisers. The competition to supply products to these high-volume storescustomers is intense. Currently, we do not have long-term supply agreements with a substantial number of our retail customers, including our largest customers. These high-volume stores and mass merchandiserscustomers frequently reevaluate the products they carry. A decision by our major customers to decrease the amount of merchandiseproduct purchased from us, including in response to shifts in consumer purchasing or traffic trends attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, sell another national brand on an exclusive or priority basis or change the manner of doing business with us could reduce our revenues and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, our customers may offer branded and private label products that compete directly with our products for retail shelf space and consumer purchases. Accordingly, there is a risk that our customers may give higher priority to their own products or to the products of our competitors. In the event of a loss of any of our large customers, a significant reduction of purchases by any of our large customers or the bankruptcy or serious financial difficulty of any of our large customers, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
Our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments operate in the historically mature RTE cereal category, and the failure or weakening of this category could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments produce and distribute branded, licensed and private label RTE cereals and hot cereals, other cereal-based food products and muesli, selling products to grocery stores, discounters, big box retailers, foodservice distributors, wholesalers and convenience stores primarily across the U.S., Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, the U.K. and Ireland. While the RTE cereal category has experienced strong demand during the COVID-19 pandemic, the RTE cereal category had previously been experiencing weakness in recent years. Although we expect some of the benefit in the RTE cereal category experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic to be long-lasting, continuing weakness in the RTE cereal category, or the weakening of our major products competing in this category, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Consolidation in the retail and foodservice distribution channels, and competitive, economic and other pressures facing our customers, may hurt our profit margins.
Over the past several years, the retail and foodservice channels have undergone significant consolidations and mass merchandisers and non-traditional retailers are gaining market share. As this trend continues and such customers grow larger, they may seek to use their position to improve their profitability through improved efficiency, lower pricing, increased reliance on their own brand name products, increased emphasis on generic and other value brands and increased promotional programs. If we are unable to respond to these requirements, our profitability or volume growth could be negatively impacted. Additionally, if any of our existing retailer or distributor customers are consolidated with another entity and the surviving entity of any such consolidation is not a customer or decides to discontinue purchasing our products, we may lose significant amounts of our preexisting business with the acquired retailer or distributor. Further, the economic and competitive landscape for our customers is constantly changing, such as the emergencegrowth of online food retailers and new sales channels like e-commerce,market participants, and our customers’ responses to those changes could impact our businesses.business. The consolidation in the retail and foodservice channels also increases the risk that adverse changes to our customers’ business operations or financial performance, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, would have a corresponding material adverse effect on us.
We will be required to make a cash payment to former Bob Evans stockholders who demanded appraisal
In connection with our acquisition of Bob Evans, we have not paid any merger consideration to former holders of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares under Delaware law and have not withdrawn their demands. If such appraisal proceedings reach a verdict, such stockholders that are determined to have validly perfected their appraisal rights will be entitled to a cash payment equal to the fair value of their shares, plus statutory interest, as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery. The amounts that we may be required to pay to such stockholders in connection with the demands for appraisal and appraisal proceedings is uncertain at this time, but could be greater than the merger consideration to which such stockholders would have been entitled had they not demanded appraisal.
Pending and future litigation may impair our reputation or lead us to incur significant costs.
We are, or may become, party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business, which may include lawsuits or claims relating to contracts, intellectual property, product recalls, product liability, false or deceptive advertising, employment matters, environmental matters or other aspects of our business. Negative publicity resulting from allegations made
in lawsuits or claims asserted against us, whether or not valid, may adversely affect our reputation. In addition, we may be required to pay damage awards or settlements or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The outcome of litigation is often difficult to predict, and the outcome of pending or future litigation may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although we have various insurance programs in place, the potential liabilities associated with these litigation matters, or those that could arise in the future, could be excluded from coverage or, if covered, could exceed the coverage provided by such programs. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to rescind or deny coverage with respect to pending or future claims or lawsuits. If we do not have sufficient coverage under our policies, or if coverage is denied, we may be required to make material payments to settle litigation or satisfy any judgment. Any of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are currently dependent on third party manufacturers to manufacture many products for our business. Our business could suffer as a result of a third party manufacturer’s inability to produce our products for us on time or to our specifications.
Our business relies on independent third parties for the manufacture of many products, such as shakes, protein bars and powders, breakfast drinks, certain cereal and granola products and certain refrigerated food products. Our business could be materially affected if we fail to develop or maintain our relationships with these third parties, if these third parties fail to comply with governmental regulations applicable to the manufacturing of our products or if any of these third parties ceases doing business with us or goes out of business. Additionally, we cannot be certain that we will not experience operational difficulties with these third party manufacturers, such as increases in manufacturing costs, reductions in the availability of production capacity, errors in complying with merchandise specifications, insufficient quality control and failure to meet production deadlines. The inability of a third party manufacturer to ship orders in a timely manner, in desirable quantities or to meet our safety, quality and social compliance standards or regulatory requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business. While certain of our relationships with these third parties are subject to minimum volume commitments, whereby the third party manufacturer has committed to produce and we have committed to purchase a minimum quantity of product, we may nonetheless experience situations where such manufacturers are unable to fulfill their obligations under our agreements.
Our historical Private Brands business has been separately capitalized with an unaffiliated third party, over which we have less control.
As a result of the completion of the previously announced transaction involving our historical Private Brands business, we hold 6.05 million shares of 8th Avenue Class B common stock, and THL holds 3.95 million shares of 8th Avenue Class A common stock and 2.5 million shares of 8th Avenue Series A preferred stock. Although we hold a substantial majority of the voting power of 8th Avenue’s common stock and have the power to appoint a majority of the members of 8th Avenue’s board of directors, THL holds certain corporate governance and other rights with respect to 8th Avenue, and we cannot control the actions of THL. THL may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals. Differences in views among THL and us may result in delayed decisions or disputes. THL’s interest could be sold to a third party, or 8th Avenue or its subsidiaries could be disposed of, in whole or in part, to third parties. These factors could potentially adversely impact the business and operations of 8th Avenue and, in turn, our business and operations.
Our historical financial information may not be indicative of our future financial performance as a result of the transaction involving our historical Private Brands business. In addition, if our investment in 8th Avenue is not profitable, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
As of October 1, 2018, in connection with the transaction involving our historical Private Brands business, 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries were deconsolidated from our financial statements. As a result, our balance sheets and statements of operations following the deconsolidation will not be comparable to the balance sheets and statements of operations reflected in our historical financial statements for periods prior to deconsolidation.
In addition, as of October 1, 2018, we hold 60.5% of the common equity of 8th Avenue. The 60.5% retained interest in 8th Avenue is accounted for using the equity method, and the carrying value of the investment in 8th Avenue will be included on our balance sheet and returns from our investment in 8th Avenue will be included in our results of operations. If our investment in 8th Avenue is not profitable, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
We are subject to certain continuing obligations, including indemnification obligations and lease guarantor obligations, related to the sale of the Bob Evans restaurants business that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2017, prior to our acquisition of Bob Evans, Bob Evans completed the sale and separation of its restaurants business (the “Bob Evans Restaurants Transaction”) to Bob Evans Restaurants, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed by affiliates of Golden Gate Capital Opportunity Fund, L.P. (the “Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer”), pursuant to a sale agreement between Bob Evans and the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer (the “Restaurants Sale Agreement”). As a result of our acquisition of Bob Evans,
we have the obligation to indemnify the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer for certain breaches of the Restaurants Sale Agreement and certain other liabilities set forth in the Restaurants Sale Agreement.
In addition, in connection with the Bob Evans Restaurants Transaction, the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer assumed the lease obligations of the Bob Evans restaurants business. However, as part of a sale leaseback transaction of 143 of Bob Evans’s restaurant properties that Bob Evans completed in 2016, Bob Evans and one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into payment and performance guaranties relating to the leases on such restaurant properties, which remained in place after the completion of the Bob Evans Restaurants Transaction. Although the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer assumed responsibility for the payment and performance obligations under the leases on the sale leaseback properties, under the terms of the guaranties, we remain liable for payments due under these leases if the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer fails to satisfy its lease obligations. Any such unexpected expenses related to our obligations under the payment and performance guaranties or under the Restaurants Sale Agreement could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments operate in the mature RTE cereal category, and the failure or weakening of this category could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments together produce and distribute branded, licensed and private label RTE cereals and hot cereals, other cereal-based food products and muesli, selling products to grocery stores, discounters, big box retailers, foodservice distributors, wholesalers and convenience stores across the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, the U.K., Ireland and the rest of the world. The RTE cereal category has experienced weakness in recent years, and we expect this trend may continue. Although we expect to achieve synergies in connection with our acquisition of the Weetabix Group, continuing weakness in the RTE cereal category, or the weakening of our major products competing in this category, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our sales and profit growth isare dependent upon our ability to expand existing market penetration, and enter into new markets.markets and enhance our product portfolio with innovative and profitable products.
Successful growth depends in part onupon our ability to add new retail and foodservice customers, as well asenter into new markets, expand the number of products sold through existing retail customers.customers and enhance our product portfolio with new innovative and profitable products. This growth would include expanding the number of our items theyproducts our customers offer for sale and our product placement. The expansion of the business of our existing segments depends onupon our ability to obtain new, or expand our business with existing, large-account customers, such as grocery store chains, mass merchandisers and mass merchandisers.foodservice distributors. Our failure to obtainsuccessfully add new orcustomers, enter into new markets, expand our business with existing, large-account customers or enhance our product portfolio could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Termination For some of our material intellectual property licenses couldbusinesses, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our innovation and growth efforts as a result of reduced demand for certain products or as our customers have a material adverse effectmodified their shelf reset timings, reduced in store-displays and promotional activities and shifted their ordering patterns to focus on our business.
We market certain ofcore products for shipments, which could adversely impact our products in the United States, Canada, the U.K.sales and several other locations pursuant to intellectual property license agreements. These licenses give us the right to use certain names, characters and logos in connection with our products and to sell the products in certain regions. If we were to breach any material term of these license agreements and not timely cure the breach, the licensor could terminate the agreement. If the licensor were to terminate our rights to use the names, characters and logos for this reason or any other reason, or if a licensor decided not to renew a license agreement upon the expiration of the license term, the loss of such rights could have a material adverse effect on our business.profit growth.
Our or 8th Avenue’s private label products may not be able to compete successfully with nationally branded products.
Several of our segments produceWe participate in the private brand food category, producing and distributedistributing private label products.products, including through our investment in 8th Avenue. In many cases, competitors with nationally branded products have a competitive advantage over private label products due to name recognition. In addition, when branded competitors focus on price and promotion, the environment for private label producers and distributors becomes more challenging because the price differential between private label products and branded products may become less significant. Competitive pressures or promotions of branded products could cause us, 8th Avenue or our or 8th Avenue’s customers to lose sales, which may require us or 8th Avenue to lower prices or increase the use of our own discounting or promotional programs, each of which would adversely affect our or 8th Avenue’s margins, business, financial condition, results of operations, profitability and cash flows.
Disruption of our supply chain and changes in weather conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In coordination with our suppliers, business partners and contract manufacturers, our ability to make, move and sell products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our collective manufacturing or distribution capabilities resulting from weather, any potential effects of climate change, natural disaster, disease, fire, explosion, cyber-attacks, terrorism, pandemics, strikes, repairs or enhancements at our facilities or other reasons could impair our ability to manufacture, sell or timely deliver our products.
In addition, the manufacturing capabilities for certain of our products are concentrated at certain of our facilities and with certain third party manufacturers. If we had to close or limit production of all or part of the operations at one or more of such facilities for any reason, or if certain of these third party manufacturers were unable to produce our desired quantities, we may be unable to increase production at our other facilities or with other third party manufacturers in a timely manner, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Changes in weather conditions and natural disasters also may affect the cost and supply of commodities and raw materials, including grains, eggs, sows, potatoes, nuts, corn syrup and sugar. Additionally, these events can result in lower recoveries of usable raw materials. Competitors can be affected differently by weather conditions and natural disasters depending on the location of their suppliers and operations. Failure to take adequate steps to reduce the likelihood or mitigate the potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a commodity or raw material is sourced from a single location, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and/or require additional resources to restore our supply chain.
Our international operations subject us to additional risks.
We are subject to a number of risks related to doing business internationally, any of which could significantly harm our business. These risks include:
•restrictions on the transfer of funds to and from foreign countries, including potentially negative tax consequences;
•unfavorable changes in tariffs, quotas, trade barriers or other export or import restrictions;
•unfavorable foreign exchange controls and currency exchange rates;
•challenges associated with cross-border product distribution;
•an outbreak of a contagious disease, such as COVID-19, which may cause us or our distributors, third party manufacturers, vendors or customers to temporarily suspend our or their respective operations in the affected city or country;
•increased exposure to general market and economic conditions, outside of the United States;
political and economic uncertainty and volatility;volatility and other events, including social unrest, government shutdowns, terrorist activity, acts of war and travel restrictions, outside of the U.S.;
the potential for substantial penalties and litigation related to violations of a wide variety of•compliance with U.S. laws treaties and regulations affecting operations outside of the U.S., including anti-corruption regulations (including(such as the United StatesU.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices ActAct) and changes to such laws and regulations;
•compliance with treaties, antitrust and competition laws, data privacy laws (including the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation), anti-corruption laws (including the U.K. Bribery Act) and privacy, food safety laws and other regulatory requirements and a variety of other local, national and multi-national regulations (includingand laws in multiple jurisdictions and changes to such laws and regulations;
•changes in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation);mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws or their interpretations or tax audit implications;
•the potential difficulty of enforcing intellectual property and contractual rights;
•increased risk of uncollectible accounts and longer collection cycles;
•unfavorable changes in labor conditions and difficulties in staffing our operations;
•the difficulty and costs of designing and implementing an effective control environment across diverse regions and employee bases;
•the difficulty and costs of maintaining effective data security; and
•unfavorable and/or changing foreign tax treaties and policies.
Our financial performance on a United StatesU.S. dollar denominated basis is subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Our principal exposure is to the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar and the Euro.
United States and global capital and credit market issues could negatively affect our liquidity, increase our costs of borrowing and disrupt the operations of our suppliers and customers.
United States and global credit markets have, from time to time, experienced significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which caused the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive and in certain cases resulted in the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. Events affecting the credit markets also have had an adverse effect on other financial markets in the United States, which may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of common stock or other equity securities or refinance our existing debt, sell our assets or borrow more money, if necessary. Our business also could be negatively impacted if our suppliers or customers experience disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy. Any of these risks could impair our ability to fund our operations or limit our ability to expand our business or increase our interest expense, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Changing currency exchange rates may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We have operations and assets in the United States as well as foreign jurisdictions, and a portion of our contracts and revenues are denominated in foreign currencies. Our consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars. We therefore must translate our foreign assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses into United States dollars at applicable exchange rates. Consequently, fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies relative to the United States dollar may negatively affect the value of these items in our consolidated financial statements. To the extent we fail to manage our foreign currency exposure adequately, we may suffer losses in value of our net foreign currency investment, and our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
The uncertainty surrounding the implementation and effect of Brexit may cause increased regulatory complexity and economic volatility affectingand could result in tariffs, which could adversely affect our operations and business.
The results of the referendum relating to the membership of the U.K. in the European Union, advising for the exit of the U.K. from the European UnionE.U. (“Brexit”), may cause disruptions to and create has created uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our existing and future customers, suppliers and employees.business. The effects of Brexit will depend on any agreementsagreement the U.K. makes to retain access to European UnionE.U. markets either during a transitional period or more permanently.
The measures could potentially disrupt the markets we serve and may cause us to lose customers, suppliers and employees. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which European UnionE.U. laws to replace or replicate. Further, our business could be adversely impacted by tariffs on imports to the U.K. as well as exports from the U.K.
These developments may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets and may significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to capital, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, tariffs could impact the ability of our Weetabix business to continue to sell product in some of the markets where it currently does business.
Agricultural diseases or pests could harm our business.business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Many of our business activities are subject to a variety of agricultural risks, including diseases and pests, which can adversely affect the quality and quantity of the raw materials we use as well asand the products we produce and distribute.distribute (or have produced or distributed by third parties), as well as increase the costs of production. Any actual or potential contamination of our products could result in product recalls, market withdrawals, product detentions, safety alerts, cessation of manufacturing or distribution or, if we fail to comply with applicable FDA, USDA or other U.S. or international regulatory authority requirements, enforcement actions. We also could be subject to product liability claims or adverse publicity if any of our products are alleged to have caused illness or injury.
Avian influenza occasionally affects the domestic poultry industry, leading to hen deaths. In 2015, an avian influenza outbreak occurred in the midwestMidwest of the United StatesU.S., affecting a substantial portion of our owned and third party contracted flocks. Although we utilize biosecurity measures at our layer locations to protect against disease exposures, if our facilities are exposed to diseases and pests, such exposure could affect a substantial portion of our production facilities in any year and could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Diseases affecting livestock (including PEDV) occasionally impact sow supply, which also could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not be able to operate successfully if we lose key personnel, are unable to hire qualified additional personnel or experience turnover of our management team.
We are highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel to operate and expand our business. If we lose key personnel or one or more members of our senior management team, or if we fail to attract new employees, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be harmed.
Labor strikes or work stoppages by our employees could harm our business.
Some of our full-time production, maintenance and warehouse employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. A dispute with a union or employees represented by a union could result in production interruptions caused by work stoppages. If a strike or work stoppage were to occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. We are currently renegotiating our collective bargaining agreement at our Post Consumer Brands manufacturing plant in Battle Creek, Michigan, which, as of November 1, 2020, covered approximately 500 employees. There is no guarantee that we will reach an agreement in a timely manner, and if an agreement is not reached, there could be an interruption in production at that facility. In addition, we could be subject to unionization efforts at our non-union facilities. Increased unionization of our workforce could lead to disruptions in our business, increases in our operating costs and constraints on our operating flexibility.
In the event of a work stoppage, we have contingency plans in place to hire additional labor or manufacture products in other locations to mitigate disruption to our business. However, there are limitations inherent in any plan to mitigate disruption to our business in the event of a work stoppage, and particularly in the case of a prolonged work stoppage, there can be no assurance that it would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may experience losses or be subject to increased funding and expenses to our qualified pension and other postretirement plans, which could negatively impact profits.
We maintain qualified defined benefit plans in the United States, Canada and the U.K. primarily for our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix businesses, and we are obligated to ensure that these plans are funded or paid in accordance with applicable regulations. In the event the assets in which we invest do not perform according to expectations, or the valuation of the projected benefit obligation increases due to changes in interest rates or other factors, we may be required to make significant cash contributions to these plans and recognize increased expense on our financial statements.
Increases in costs of medical and other employee health and welfare benefits may reduce our profitability.
With approximately 9,790 employees as of November 1, 2018 (which excludes the employees of our unconsolidated subsidiaries), our profitability may be substantially affected by costs of medical and other health and welfare benefits for these employees as well as certain former employees. Although we try to control these costs, they can vary because of changes in health care laws and experience, which have the potential to increase the cost of providing medical and other employee health and welfare benefits. Any substantial increase could negatively affect our profitability.
Technology failures, cybersecurity incidents and corruption of our data privacy protections could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store operating and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business, processes and activities and to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. For example, our production and distribution facilities and inventory management utilize information technology to increase efficiencies and control costs. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between our personnel, customers and suppliers depends on information technology. Some of our information technology needs are outsourced to third parties. Our and our third party vendors’ information technology systems may be vulnerable to a variety of interruptions due to events beyond our or their control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, power outages, computer viruses and malware, hardware or software failures, cybersecurity incidents, hackers and other security issues. Such interruptions could negatively impact our business.
If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the related automated and manual control processes, or if one of our third party service providers fails to provide the services we require, we could be subject to billing and collection errors, business disruptions or damage resulting from such events, particularly material security breaches and cybersecurity incidents. If any of our significant information technology systems suffers severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, litigation and reputational damage from leaks of confidential or personal information. While we have insurance programs in place related to these matters, the potential liabilities associated with such events, or those that could arise in the future, could be excluded from coverage or, if covered, could exceed the coverage provided by such programs. Although we have not detected a material security breach or cybersecurity incident to date, we have been the target of events of this nature and expect them to continue.
We also are subject to an evolving body of federal, state and foreign laws, regulations, guidelines and principles regarding data privacy, data protection and data security. A data breach or inability on our part to comply with such laws, regulations, guidelines and principles, or to quickly adapt our practices to reflect them as they develop, could potentially subject us to significant liabilities and reputational harm. Several foreign governments, including the European Union, have laws and regulations dealing with the collection and use of personal information obtained from their data subjects, and we could incur substantial penalties or litigation related to violations of such laws and regulations. In addition, our efforts to comply with such laws and regulations may impose significant costs and challenges on us.
Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products and brands.
We consider our intellectual property rights, particularly our trademarks, but also our patents, trade secrets, copyrights and licenses, to be a significant and valuable asset of our business. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as exclusive and nonexclusive licensing agreements, third party nondisclosure, confidentiality and assignment agreements and the policing of third party misuses of our intellectual property. Our failure or inability to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights, or any change in law or other changes that serve to lessen or remove the current legal protections of intellectual property, may diminish our competitiveness and could materially harm our business. In addition, as certain of our trademarks and trade names are subject to nonexclusive licenses and are shared and used by third parties, negative events outside of our control could have an adverse impact on us, our results of operations, our financial condition and our cash flows.
We face the risk of claims that we have infringed third parties’ intellectual property rights. Any claims of intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could be expensive and time consuming to defend; cause us to cease making, licensing or using products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property; require us to redesign or rebrand our products or packaging, if feasible; divert management’s attention and resources; or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property. Any royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Additionally, a successful claim of infringement against us could require us to pay significant damages, enter into costly license or royalty agreements or stop the sale of certain products, any or all of which could have a negative impact on our operating profits and harm our future prospects.
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that can impose significant costs and expose us to potential financial liabilities.
We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment, including those limiting the discharge and release of pollutants into the environment and those regulating the transport, storage, disposal and remediation of, and exposure to, solid and hazardous wastes. In addition, our Refrigerated Food business is subject to particular federal and state requirements governing animal feeding operations and the management of animal waste. Certain environmental laws and regulations can impose joint and several liability without regard to fault on responsible
parties, including past and present owners and operators of sites, related to cleaning up sites at which hazardous materials were disposed of or released. Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations could result in severe fines and penalties by governments or courts of law. In addition, future laws may more stringently regulate the emission of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide and methane. We cannot predict the impact that such regulation may have, or that climate change may otherwise have, on our business.
Future events, such as new or more stringent environmental laws and regulations, new environmental claims, the discovery of currently unknown environmental conditions requiring response action or more vigorous interpretations or enforcement of existing environmental laws and regulations, might require us to incur additional costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Climate change, or legal or market measures to address climate change, may negatively affect our business and operations.
There is growing concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. If any of these climate changes has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commoditiesraw materials that are necessary for our products, including wheat, oats and other grain products, dairy-based proteins, eggs, potatoes and sows. In addition, increases in the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters may result in damage and disruptions to our manufacturing operations and distribution channels.channels or our third party manufacturers’
operations, particularly where a product is primarily sourced from a single location. Also, the impacts of these climate changes may cause unpredictable water availability or exacerbate water scarcity. Water is critical to our business, and the lack of available water of acceptable quality may lead to, among other things, adverse effects on our operations. The increasing concern over climate change and related environmental sustainability matters also may result in more federal, state, local and foreign legal requirements, including requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases.gases or conserve and replenish water. If such laws are enacted, we may experience significant increases in our costs of operation and delivery. Further, our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to effectively address increased concerns from the media, shareholders and other stakeholders on climate change and related environmental sustainability and governance matters. As a result, climate change could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and operations.cash flows.
Our actualActual operating results may differ significantly from our or BellRing’s guidance.
From time to time, we release guidance regarding our future performance, the future performance of some or all of our unconsolidated and consolidated subsidiaries or the expected future performance of companies or businesses that we have agreed to acquire. This guidance, which consists of forward-looking statements, is prepared by our management and is qualified by, and subject to, the assumptions and the other information contained or referred to in such release and thecertain factors described under “Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements” in our current and periodic reports filed with the SEC. Our guidance is not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compileshas audited, reviewed, examined, compiled or examinesapplied agreed upon procedures with respect to the guidance and, accordingly, no such person expresses any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The independent registered public accounting firm report included herein relates to our previously issued financial statements. It does not extend to any guidance and should not be read to do so.
Guidance is based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, although presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We generally state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal reason that we release this data is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such persons.
Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Actual results will vary from the guidance. Investors also should recognize that the reliability of any forecasted financial data diminishes the farther in the future that the data is forecast.forecasted. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged to put the guidance in context and not to place undue reliance on it.
Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of the risks or uncertainties set forth in this report could result in actual operating results being different than the guidance, and such differences may be adverse and material.
Similarly, BellRing, as a separate publicly-traded company whose financial results are consolidated into Post’s financial statements, releases guidance regarding its future performance, which consists of forward-looking statements. These statements are prepared by BellRing’s management, and we do not accept any responsibility for any such statements.
Risks Related to Our Strategy
Our business strategy depends upon us identifying and completing additional acquisitions and other strategic transactions. We may not be able to successfully consummate favorable strategic transactions in the future. Our corporate development activities also may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although we continuously evaluate strategic transactions, we may be unable to identify suitable strategic transactions in the future or may not be able to enter into such transactions at favorable prices or on terms that are favorable to us. Alternatively, we may in the future enter into additional strategic transactions, and any such transaction could happen at any time, could be material to our business and could take any number of forms, including, for example, an acquisition, investment or merger, for cash or in exchange for our equity securities, a divestiture or a joint venture.
Evaluating potential transactions, including divestitures and joint ventures, requires additional expenditures (including legal, accounting and due diligence expenses, higher administrative costs to support any acquired entities and information technology, personnel and other integration expenses) and may divert the attention of our management from ordinary operating matters.
Our corporate development activities also may present financial and operational risks and may have adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers. In addition, future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related to certain intangible
assets and increased operating expenses, all of which could, individually or collectively, adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a result of the IPO of a minority interest in our BellRing Brands business, which consists of our historical active nutrition business, we are subject to various risks and uncertainties, any of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a result of the IPO and the formation transactions, BellRing Brands, LLC is the holding company for our historical active nutrition business. Effective October 21, 2019, BellRing became a holding company owning 28.8% of the BellRing Brands, LLC units, and Post owns one share of BellRing’s Class B common stock and 71.2% of the BellRing Brands, LLC units. For so long as Post or its affiliates (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) directly own more than 50% of the BellRing Brands, LLC units, the share of Class B common stock represents 67% of the combined voting power of the common stock of BellRing.
We may not be able to achieve the anticipated strategic and financial benefits expected as a result of the IPO. In addition, as a result of the IPO and the formation transactions, we only benefit from a portion of any profits and growth of the BellRing Brands business, and our historical financial information prior to the IPO may not be comparable to or indicative of future results. Further, the BellRing Brands business is subject to additional costs as a result of being a standalone public company.
We may experience difficulties in integrating acquired businesses, or acquisitions may not perform as expected.
We have acquired multiple businesses, and we may continue to acquire other businesses. The successful integration of these acquisitions depends upon our ability to manage the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses. Integrating operations is complex and requires significant efforts and expenses on the part of both us and the acquired businesses. Potential difficulties we may encounter as part of the integration process include, but are not limited to, the following:
•employees may voluntarily or involuntarily separate employment from us or the acquired businesses because of the acquisitions;
•our management may have its attention diverted while trying to integrate the acquired businesses;
•we may encounter obstacles when incorporating the acquired businesses into our operations and management, including integrating or separating personnel, financial systems, operating procedures, regulatory compliance programs, technology, networks and other assets in a seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies;
•differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies;
•integration may be more costly, time-consuming or complex or less effective than anticipated;
•inability to maintain uniform standards, controls and procedures; and
•we may discover previously undetected operational or other issues, such as fraud.
Any of these factors could adversely affect our and the acquired businesses’ ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies.
In addition, the success of these acquired businesses will depend, in part, upon our ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies through the successful integration of the businesses we acquire with our existing businesses. Even if we are successful in integrating acquired businesses, we cannot assure you that these integrations will result in the realization of the full benefit of any anticipated growth opportunities or cost synergies or that these benefits will be realized within the expected time frames. In addition, acquired businesses may have unanticipated liabilities or contingencies.
Financial Risks
U.S. and global capital and credit market issues, including those that have arisen or may arise as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could negatively affect our liquidity, increase our costs of borrowing and disrupt the operations of our suppliers and customers.
U.S. and global credit markets have, from time to time, experienced significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which have caused the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive and in certain cases resulted in the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased, and may continue to increase, volatility and pricing in the capital markets. This and other events affecting the credit markets also have had an adverse effect on other financial markets in the U.S., which may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of common stock or other equity securities or refinance our existing debt, sell our assets or borrow money, if necessary. Our business also could be negatively impacted if our suppliers or customers experience disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy, whether resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise. Any of
these risks could impair our ability to fund our operations or limit our ability to expand our business or increase our interest expense, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Impairment in the carrying value of intangible assets could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. If our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we will be required to record additional impairment charges, which may be significant.
Our balance sheet includes a significant amount of intangible assets, including goodwill, trademarks, trade names and other acquired intangibles. Intangibles and goodwill expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, but our management reviews them for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may be impaired. Impairments to intangible assets may be caused by factors outside of our control, such as increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry EBITDA (which stands for earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and revenue multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest rates, etc.) or the bankruptcy of a significant customer. We also continue to evaluate the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the fair value of our intangible assets. These factors, along with other internal and external factors, could have a significant negative impact on our fair value determination, which could then result in a material impairment charge in our results of operations. In fiscal 2020, we had no impairments of goodwill or other intangible assets. In fiscal 2019, we had an impairment of both goodwill and other definite-lived intangible assets. In fiscal 2018, we had an impairment of other indefinite-lived intangible assets and no impairment of goodwill. See further discussion of these impairments in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report and Notes 2 and 7 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8 of this report.
Unsuccessful implementation of business strategies to reduce costs, or unintended consequences of the implementation of such strategies, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Many of our costs, such as freight, raw materials and energy, are outside of our control. Therefore, we must seek to reduce costs in other areas, such as through operating efficiency. If we are unablenot able to continuecomplete projects designed to satisfyreduce costs and increase operating efficiency on time or within budget, or if the requirementsimplementation of Section 404these projects results in unintended consequences, such as business disruptions, distraction of management and employees or reduced productivity, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted. The COVID-19 pandemic has, in certain instances, resulted in delays of certain cost-saving and productivity initiatives. Continued disruptions and uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic for a sustained period of time could result in additional delays or modifications to our strategic plans and other initiatives or impact our ability to complete projects to reduce costs or improve efficiency on planned timelines. In addition, if the cost-saving initiatives we have implemented, or any future cost-saving initiatives, do not generate the expected cost savings and synergies, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
As a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or our internaltransactions to separately capitalize 8th Avenue, we have less control over financial reporting is not effective, the reliabilityour historical private brands business, and certain of our historical financial statements may be questioned, and our stock price may suffer.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) requires any company subject to the reporting requirements of the United States securities laws to perform a comprehensive evaluation of its and its consolidated subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we are required to document and test our internal control procedures, our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to issue an opinion on its audit of our internal control over financial reporting.
The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards under the rules.
During the course of its testing, our management may identify material weaknesses or significant deficiencies whichinformation may not be remediedcomparable with our future financial performance. In addition, if our investment in 8th Avenue is not profitable, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Effective October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue, which became the holding company for our historical private brands business, was separately capitalized by us and third parties (the transactions to separately capitalize 8th Avenue are referred to as the “8th Avenue Transactions”). As a result of the 8th Avenue Transactions, we hold 6.05 million shares of 8th Avenue Class B common stock, and third parties and members of 8th Avenue’s management team together hold 3.95 million shares of 8th Avenue Class A common stock and 2.5 million shares of 8th Avenue Series A preferred stock. Although we hold a substantial majority of the voting power of 8th Avenue’s common stock and have the power to appoint a majority of the members of 8th Avenue’s board of directors, third parties hold certain corporate governance and other rights with respect to 8th Avenue, and we cannot control the actions of such third parties. Such third parties may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with each other and our business interests or goals. Differences in views among the owners of 8th Avenue may result in delayed decisions or disputes. In addition, such third parties could sell their interests in 8th Avenue, or 8th Avenue or its subsidiaries could be disposed of, in whole or in part, to other third parties with different views or economic or business interests or goals. These factors could potentially adversely impact the business and operations of 8th Avenue and, in turn, our business and operations.
In connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions, as of October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries were deconsolidated from our financial statements. As a result, our balance sheets and statements of operations following the deconsolidation are not and will not be comparable to the balance sheets and statements of operations reflected in our historical financial statements for periods prior to deconsolidation.
As of October 1, 2018, our 60.5% retained interest in 8th Avenue is accounted for using the equity method, and the carrying value of the investment in 8th Avenue is included on our balance sheet and returns from our investment in 8th Avenue are included in our results of operations. If our investment in 8th Avenue is not profitable, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Volatility in the market value of derivatives we use to manage exposures to fluctuations of our manufacturing costs will cause volatility in our margins and net earnings.
We utilize derivatives to manage price risk for some of our principal ingredient and energy costs. Changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded in earnings, resulting in volatility in our margins and net earnings. These gains and losses are reported in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and in unallocated corporate items outside of our segment operating results until we utilize the underlying input in our manufacturing process, at which time the gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating profit. We may experience volatile earnings as a result of these accounting treatments.
Changing currency exchange rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We have operations and assets in the U.S. as well as foreign jurisdictions, and a portion of our contracts and revenues are denominated in foreign currencies. Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. We therefore must translate our foreign assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses into U.S. dollars at applicable exchange rates. Consequently, fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar may negatively affect the value of these items in our consolidated financial statements. From time to meettime, we enter into agreements that are intended to reduce the annual deadline imposed by SOX. If our management cannot favorably assess the effectivenesseffects of our internalexposure to currency fluctuations, but these agreements may not be effective in significantly reducing our exposure. To the extent we fail to manage our foreign currency exposure adequately, we may suffer losses in value of our net foreign currency investment, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
We may experience losses or be subject to increased funding and expenses to our qualified pension and other postretirement plans, which could negatively impact profits.
We maintain and contribute to qualified defined benefit plans in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. primarily for our Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix businesses. With respect to those plans we maintain, we are obligated to ensure that these plans are funded or paid in accordance with applicable regulations. In the event the assets in which we invest do not perform according to expectations, or the valuation of the projected benefit obligation increases due to changes in interest rates or other factors, we may be required to make significant cash contributions to these plans and recognize increased expense on our financial statements.
Increases in labor-related costs, including the costs of medical and other employee health and welfare benefits, may reduce our profitability.
Inflationary pressures and any shortages in the labor market could increase labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. Labor costs also include the costs of providing medical and other health and welfare benefits to our employees as well as certain former employees. With approximately 10,200 employees as of November 1, 2020 (which excludes the employees of our unconsolidated subsidiaries), our profitability may be substantially affected by the costs of such benefits. Although we try to control over financial reportingthese costs, they can vary because of changes in health care laws and claims experience, which have the potential to increase the cost of providing medical and other employee health and welfare benefits. In addition, we continue to monitor the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these costs. Any substantial increase in these costs could negatively affect our profitability.
Legal, Regulatory and Technology Risks
Violations of laws or regulations, as well as new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations or to interpretations thereof, could adversely affect our business.
Our business is subject to a variety of laws and regulations administered by federal, state and local government authorities in the U.S., as well as government authorities outside of the U.S., including requirements related to food safety, quality, manufacturing, processing, storage, marketing, advertising, labeling and distribution, animal welfare, worker health and workplace safety. Our activities, both inside and outside of the U.S., are subject to extensive regulation. In the U.S., we are regulated by, and our activities are affected by, among other federal, state and local authorities and regulations, the FDA, the USDA, the Federal Trade Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65). In Europe, we are regulated by, among other authorities, the U.K.’s Food Standards Agency, Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Environmental Health, the Information Commissioners Office and the Trading Standards Office and their equivalents in E.U. member states. We also are regulated by similar authorities elsewhere in the world where our products are distributed or licensed. Governmental regulations also affect taxes and levies, tariffs, import and export restrictions, healthcare costs, energy usage, data privacy and immigration and labor issues, any or all of which may have a direct or indirect effect on our business or the businesses of our customers or suppliers. In addition, we could be the target of claims relating to alleged false or deceptive advertising under federal, state and foreign laws and regulations and may be subject to initiatives to limit or prohibit the marketing and advertising of our products to children.
The impact of current laws and regulations, changes in these laws or regulations or interpretations thereof or the introduction of new laws or regulations could increase the costs of doing business for us or our independent registered public accounting firm identifiescustomers, suppliers or third party manufacturers, causing our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to be adversely affected. As specific examples, Canada has enacted new food safety laws, and some states have passed laws that mandate specific housing requirements for layer hens and mandate specific space requirements for farm animal enclosures, including layer hens and pigs, which we expect will result in us incurring additional operating and capital costs in the future.
It also is possible that federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take regulatory or enforcement action, which could result in significant fines or penalties, revocations of required licenses or injunctions, as well as potential criminal sanctions. If we are found to be significantly out of compliance with applicable laws, regulations or permits, an enforcement authority could issue a warning letter and/or institute enforcement actions that could result in additional costs, product detentions, substantial delays in production or even a temporary shutdown in manufacturing and product sales while the non-conformances are rectified. Also, we may have to recall product or otherwise remove product from the market, and temporarily cease its manufacture and distribution, which would increase our costs and reduce our revenues. Any claims, such as product liability or labeling claims, resulting from the failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations would be expensive to defend and could result in substantial damage awards against us or harm our reputation. Any of these events would negatively impact our revenues and costs of operations. The limited availability of government inspectors due to a government shutdown, government restrictions, pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) or other outbreaks of contagious diseases or closed borders also could cause disruption to our manufacturing facilities.
We also may be impacted by changes to administrative policies, such as business restrictions, tariffs and trade agreements, in markets in which we manufacture, sell or distribute our products. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in quarantines, travel restrictions, product and equipment seizures, import and export restrictions, price controls, governmental and regulatory actions, mandatory business closures and other restrictions that could adversely impact our operations. The U.S., Canada and Mexico have renegotiated and replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) with the U.S., Mexico, Canada Agreement (“USMCA”). While we currently do not anticipate that the USMCA will have a material weaknessesimpact on our results, we continue to closely monitor the impact of USMCA on our consolidated and unconsolidated businesses.
Certain of our Foodservice, Refrigerated Retail and BellRing Brands products are subject to a higher level of regulatory scrutiny, resulting in increased costs of operations and the potential for delays in product sales.
Certain of our internal controls, investor confidenceFoodservice and Refrigerated Retail businesses’ meat and egg products are subject to continuous on-site inspections by the USDA. Some of our BellRing Brands products are regulated by the FDA as dietary supplements, which are subject to FDA regulations and levels of regulatory scrutiny that are different from those applicable to conventional food. Internationally, certain of our BellRing Brands products are regulated as food and dietary supplements and, in our financialsome cases, may be regulated as drug products. Such heightened regulatory scrutiny results may weaken,in increased costs of operations and our stock price may consequently suffer.the potential for delays in product sales. In addition, there is some risk that product classifications could be changed by the regulators, which could result in the event we do not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we might fail to timely preventsignificant fines, penalties, discontinued distribution and relabeling costs.
Pending and future litigation may impair our reputation or detect potential financial misstatements. As of September 30, 2018, management determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Actions of shareholders could cause us to incur significant costs.
We are, or may become, party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business, which may include lawsuits or claims relating to contracts, including as a result of the contract suspension notices delivered to certain of our suppliers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, intellectual property, product recalls, product liability, false or deceptive advertising, employment matters, environmental matters or other aspects of our business. There has been a recent increase in lawsuits filed against food and beverage companies alleging deceptive advertising and labeling. In addition, actions we have taken or may take, or decisions we have made or may make, as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, may result in legal claims or litigation against us. Negative publicity resulting from allegations made in lawsuits or claims asserted against us, whether or not valid, may adversely affect our reputation or brands. In addition, we may incur substantial costs divert management’s attention and resourcesfees in defending such actions or asserting our rights, be required to pay damage awards or settlements or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The outcome of litigation is often difficult to predict, and the outcome of pending or future litigation may have ana material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although we have various insurance programs in place, the potential liabilities associated with these litigation matters, or those that could arise in the future, could be excluded from coverage or, if covered, could exceed the coverage provided by such programs. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to rescind or deny coverage with respect to pending or future claims or lawsuits. If we do not have sufficient coverage under our policies, or if coverage is denied, we may be required to make material payments to settle litigation or satisfy any judgment. Any of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to certain continuing obligations, including indemnification obligations and lease guarantor obligations, related to the sale of the Bob Evans restaurants business that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2017, prior to our acquisition of Bob Evans, Bob Evans completed the sale and separation of its restaurants business (the “Bob Evans Restaurants Transaction”) to Bob Evans Restaurants, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed by affiliates of Golden Gate Capital Opportunity Fund, L.P. (the “Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer”), pursuant to a sale agreement between Bob Evans and the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer (the “Restaurants Sale Agreement”). As a result of our acquisition of Bob Evans, we have the obligation to indemnify the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer for certain breaches of the Restaurants Sale Agreement and certain other liabilities set forth in the Restaurants Sale Agreement.
In addition, in connection with the Bob Evans Restaurants Transaction, the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer assumed the lease obligations of the Bob Evans restaurants business. However, as part of a sale leaseback transaction of 143 of Bob Evans’s restaurant properties that Bob Evans completed in 2016, Bob Evans and one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into payment and performance guarantees relating to the leases on such restaurant properties, which remained in place after the completion of the Bob Evans Restaurants Transaction. Although the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer assumed responsibility for the payment and performance obligations under the leases on the sale leaseback properties, under the terms of the guarantees, we remain liable for payments due under these leases, subject in certain cases to certain early termination allowances, if the Bob Evans Restaurants Buyer fails to satisfy its lease obligations. Any such unexpected expenses related to our obligations under the payment and performance guarantees or under the Restaurants Sale Agreement could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Termination of our material intellectual property licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business.
From timeWe market certain of our products in the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and several other locations pursuant to time,intellectual property license agreements. These licenses give us the right to use certain names, characters and logos in connection with our products and to sell the products in certain regions. If we were to breach any material term of these license agreements and not timely cure the breach, the licensor could terminate the agreement. If the licensor were to terminate our rights to use the names, characters and logos for this reason or any other reason, or if a licensor decided not to renew a license agreement upon the expiration of the license term, the loss of such rights could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products and brands.
We consider our intellectual property rights, particularly our trademarks, but also our patents, trade secrets, know-how, copyrights and licenses, to be a significant and valuable asset of our business. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as exclusive and nonexclusive licensing agreements, third party nondisclosure, confidentiality and assignment agreements, confidentiality provisions in third party agreements and the policing of third party misuses of our intellectual property. Our failure or inability to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights, or any change in law or other changes that serve to lessen or remove the current legal protections of intellectual property, may diminish our competitiveness and could materially harm our business. In addition, as certain of our trademarks, trade names and trade secrets are subject to licenses and are shared and used by third parties, negative events outside of our control could have an adverse impact on us and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We face the risk of claims that we have infringed third parties’ intellectual property rights. Any claims of intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend; cause us to cease making, licensing or using products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property; require us to redesign or rebrand our products or packaging, if feasible; divert management’s attention and resources; or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property. Any royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Additionally, a successful claim of infringement against us could require us to pay significant damages, enter into costly license or royalty agreements or stop the sale of certain products, any or all of which could have a negative impact on our operating profits and harm our future prospects.
Technology failures, cybersecurity incidents or corruption of our data privacy protections could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store operating and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities, including production, and to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. For example, our production and distribution facilities and inventory management utilize information technology to increase efficiencies and control costs. We also depend upon our information technology infrastructure for digital marketing activities and for electronic communications among our locations, personnel, customers, third party manufacturers and suppliers. The importance of such networks and systems has increased due to many of our employees working remotely as a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our and our third party vendors’ information technology systems may be vulnerable to a variety of invasions, interruptions or malfunctions due to events beyond our or their control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, power outages, computer viruses, ransomware and malware, hardware or software failures, cybersecurity incidents, hackers and other causes. Such invasions, interruptions or malfunctions could negatively impact our business.
If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the related automated and manual control processes, or if one of our third party service providers fails to provide the services we require, we could be subject to, proposalsamong other things, billing and collection errors, business disruptions or damage resulting from such events, particularly material security breaches and cybersecurity incidents. Cyberattacks and other requestscyber incidents are occurring more frequently, are constantly evolving in nature, are becoming more sophisticated and are being made by individuals and groups (including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored institutions, terrorist organizations and individuals or groups participating in organized crime) with a wide range of expertise and motives (including monetization of corporate, payment or other internal or personal data, theft of trade secrets and intellectual property for competitive advantage and leverage for political, social, economic and environmental reasons).
If any of our significant information technology systems suffers severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, litigation and reputational damage from shareholders urgingleaks of confidential or personal information. While we have insurance programs in place related to these matters, the potential liabilities associated with such events, or those that could arise in the future, could be excluded from coverage or, if covered, could exceed the coverage provided by such programs. Although we have not detected a material security breach or cybersecurity incident to date, we have been the target of events of this nature and expect them to continue.
We also are subject to an evolving body of federal, state and foreign laws, regulations, guidelines and principles regarding personal information, data privacy, data protection and data security. Several foreign governments have laws and regulations dealing with the collection and use of personal information obtained from their data subjects, including the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation, and we could incur substantial penalties or litigation related to violations of such laws and regulations. The invalidation of the privacy shield transfer mechanism between the U.S. and the E.U. under E.U. law exposes us to take certain corporate actions,additional risks related to personal information obtained from E.U. data subjects.
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that can impose significant costs and expose us to potential financial liabilities.
We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment, including proposals seekingthose limiting the discharge and release of pollutants into the environment and those regulating the transport, storage, disposal and remediation of, and exposure to, influencesolid and hazardous wastes. In addition, our corporate policiesFoodservice and Refrigerated Retail businesses are subject to particular federal and state requirements governing animal housing and feeding operations and the management of animal waste, which we expect will result in us incurring additional operating and capital costs in the future. Certain environmental laws and regulations can impose joint and several liability without regard to fault on responsible parties, including past and present owners and operators of sites, related to cleaning up sites at which hazardous materials were disposed of or effectingreleased. Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations could result in severe fines and penalties by governments or courts of law. In addition, future laws may more stringently regulate the emission of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide and methane. We cannot predict the impact that such regulations may have, or that climate change may otherwise have, on our business.
Future events, such as new or more stringent environmental laws and regulations, new environmental claims, the discovery of currently unknown environmental conditions requiring response action or more vigorous interpretations or enforcement of existing environmental laws and regulations, might require us to incur additional costs that could have a change in our management. In the event of such shareholder proposals, particularly with respect to matters which our management and Board of Directors, in exercising their fiduciary duties, disagree with or have determined not to pursue,material adverse effect on our business, could be adversely affected because responding to actions and requestsfinancial condition, results of shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupting our operations and diverting the attention of management and our employees. Additionally, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction may result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel, business partners and customers.cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
We have substantial debt and high leverage, whichcould have a negative impact on our financing options and liquidity position and which could adversely affect our business.
We have a significant amount of debt. We had $7,917.4$7,049.7 million in aggregate principal amount of total debt as of September 30, 2018, which includes $625.0 million borrowed under a bridge loan facility that was assumed by 8th Avenue upon the closing of the transaction involving our historical Private Brands business on October 1, 2018 (the “Bridge Loan”) and was classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2018.2020.Additionally, our secured revolving credit facility hashad borrowing capacity of $781.5$731.2 million at September 30, 20182020 (all of which would be secured when drawn). BellRing Brands, LLC, a subsidiary of BellRing, had $703.7 million in aggregate principal amount of debt, which is included in our total debt amount referenced earlier in this paragraph, and borrowing capacity of $170.0 million under its secured revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2020. Post and its
subsidiaries (other than BellRing Brands, LLC and certain of its subsidiaries) are not obligors or guarantors under the BellRing Brands, LLC debt facilities.
Our overall leverage and the terms of our financing arrangements could:
•limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, for capital expenditures, for acquisitions, to fund growth or for general corporate purposes, even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity, particularly if any ratings assigned to our debt securities by rating organizations were revised downward;
•make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under the terms of our financing arrangements;
•trigger limitations on our ability to deduct interest paid on such indebtedness;
•limit our ability to refinance our indebtedness on terms acceptable to us or at all;
•limit our flexibility to plan for and to adjust to changing business and market conditions in the industries in which we operate and increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make interest and principal payments on our debt, thereby limiting the availability of our cash flow to fund future investments, capital expenditures, working capital, business activities and other general corporate requirements;
•increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions; and
•subject us to higher levels of indebtedness than our competitors, which may cause a competitive disadvantage and may reduce our flexibility in responding to increased competition.
Our ability to meet expenses and debt service obligations will depend onupon our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, including the impact of pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of contagious diseases, potential changes in consumer and customer preferences and behaviors, the success of product and marketing innovation and pressure from competitors. If we do not generate enough cash to pay our debt service obligations, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or raiseissue additional equity.
Despite our current level of indebtedness, we may be able to incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks described above.related to our debt and leverage.
We may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. Although the financing arrangements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. These restrictions also will not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness, as defined in the documents governing our indebtedness.
The agreements governing our debt, including the indentures governing our senior notes, contain, or may in future financings contain, various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions and also require us to meet financial maintenance tests, and failure to comply with these covenants could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our financing arrangements contain restrictions, covenants and events of default that, among other things, require us to satisfy certain financial tests and maintain certain financial ratios and restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness and to refinance our existing indebtedness. Financing arrangements which we enter into in the future could contain similar restrictions and could additionally require us to comply with similar, new or additional financial tests or to maintain similar, new or additional financial ratios. The terms of our financing arrangements, financing arrangements which we enter into in the future and any future indebtedness may impose various restrictions and covenants on us that could limit our ability to pay dividends, respond to market conditions, provide for capital investment needs or take advantage of business opportunities by limiting the amount of additional borrowings we may incur. These restrictions include compliance with, or maintenance of, certain financial tests and ratios and may limit or prohibit our ability to, among other things:
•borrow money or guarantee debt;
•create liens;
•pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase stock or other securities;
•make investments and acquisitions;
•enter into or permit to exist contractual limits on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us;
•enter into new lines of business;
•enter into transactions with affiliates; and
•sell assets or merge with other companies.
Various risks, uncertainties and events beyond our control, including the impact of pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of contagious diseases, could affect our ability to comply with these restrictions and covenants. Failure to comply with any of the restrictions and covenants in our existing or future financing arrangements could result in a default under those arrangements and under other arrangements containing cross-default provisions.
Our credit agreement contains customary financial covenants, including a covenant requiring us to maintain a senior secured net leverage ratio (as defined in our credit agreement) not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00, measured as of the last day of any fiscal quarter if, as of the last day of such fiscal quarter, the aggregate outstanding amount of all revolving credit loans, swing line loans and letter of credit obligations (subject to certain exceptions specified in our credit agreement) exceeds 30% of our revolving credit commitments. Our credit agreement permits us to incur other secured or unsecured debt, in all cases subject to certain exceptions, to incur additional unsecured debt only if, among other conditions our pro forma consolidated interest coverage ratio, calculatedand limitations on the amount as providedspecified in our credit agreement. BellRing Brands, LLC’s credit agreement would be greater than or equal(the “BellRing LLC credit agreement”) contains a financial covenant requiring BellRing Brands, LLC to 2.00maintain a total net leverage ratio (as defined in the BellRing LLC credit agreement) not to exceed 6.00 to 1.00, after giving effect to such new debt. The indenturesmeasured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, beginning with the fiscal quarter that govern our senior notes, subject to certain exceptions, contain a similar restriction.ended March 31, 2020.
A default would permit lenders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these arrangements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. Under these circumstances, we might not have sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all of our obligations, including our obligations under our indentures and credit agreement and convertible preferred stock.agreement. In addition, the limitations imposed by financing agreements on our ability to incur additional debt and to take other actions might significantly impair our ability to obtain other financing.
Certain of our subsidiaries mayare not be subject to the restrictive covenants in our debt.debt, and their financial resources and assets may not be available to us to pay our obligations on our indebtedness.
We have designated 8th Avenue and theits subsidiaries of 8th Avenueand BellRing and its subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries under our credit agreement and senior note indentures. Any subsidiary that is designated as unrestricted is not a guarantor under our credit agreement or under our senior note indentures, and the assets of our unrestricted subsidiaries do not secure our obligations under our credit agreement. 8th Avenue and BellRing Brands, LLC have entered into secured credit facilities that are separate from our credit agreement and senior note indentures and that restrict, among other matters, their ability to make distributions to us or engage in transactions with us. Accordingly, the financial resources and other assets of 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries and BellRing Brands, LLC and its subsidiaries may not be available to us to pay our obligations on our indebtedness until all of the liabilities of the unrestricted subsidiaries have been paid in full.or, if available, may be significantly limited.
To service our indebtedness and other cash needs, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends onupon many factors beyond our control.control, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations.
Our ability to pay interest on our outstanding senior notes, to satisfy our other debt obligations and to fund any planned capital expenditures, dividends and other cash needs will depend in part upon the future financial and operating performance of our subsidiaries and upon our ability to renew or refinance borrowings. Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the impact of pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) and other outbreaks of contagious diseases, will affect our ability to make these payments.
If we are unable to make payments or refinance our debt or obtain new financing under these circumstances, we may consider other options, including:
•sales of assets;
•sales of equity;
•reduction or delay of capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances; or
•negotiations with our lenders to restructure the applicable debt.
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may not be available to us in ana sufficient amount, sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, including the senior notes and our other debt obligations, or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our debt on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Increases in interest rates may negatively affect earnings.
As of September 30, 2018,2020, we did not have debt outstanding with exposure to interest rate risk. However, in the future, we may have debt outstanding with exposure to interest rate risk. In addition, the aggregate principal amount of ourBellRing Brands, LLC’s debt instruments with exposure to interest rate risk was $2,797.5$703.7 million based on the outstanding debt balanceas of our term loan and the $625.0 million Bridge Loan, which was classified as held for sale. As a result, higherSeptember 30, 2020. Higher interest rates
will increase the cost of servicing our and BellRing Brands, LLC’s financial instruments with exposure to interest rate risk and could materially reduce our profitability and cash flows. In May 2017, we entered into $1,000.0 million of long-term interest rate swap agreements to lock into a fixed LIBOR rate base, beginning on May 24, 2017 and ending on May 24, 2024. As of September 30, 2018,2020, each one hundred basis points change in LIBOR ratesLondon Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) would result in an approximate $18.0$4.0 million change in the annual cash interest expense, before any principal payment, on ourBellRing Brands, LLC’s financial instruments with exposure to interest rate risk, including the impact of the $1,000.0$350.0 million in interest rate swap agreements.agreements held by BellRing Brands, LLC and excluding the impact of any interest rate floors (as defined in the BellRing Brands, LLC credit agreement). At September 30, 2020, we held interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $2,371.0 million, excluding the interest rate swaps held by BellRing Brands, LLC, to lock into a fixed LIBOR rate for debt expected to be issued but not yet priced.
WithThe U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the closingend of 2021. Certain of BellRing Brands, LLC’s variable rate debt and our secured revolving credit facility use LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing interest rates. In addition, certain hedging transactions reference LIBOR as a benchmark rate in order to determine the applicable interest rate or payment amount. In the event LIBOR is discontinued, replaced or significantly changed, or ceases to be recognized as an acceptable benchmark, there may be uncertainty or differences in the calculation of the 8th Avenue transaction on October 1, 2018,applicable interest rate or payment amount depending upon the Company assigned the $625.0 million Bridge Loan to 8th Avenue, repaid approximately $863.0 millionterms of the Company’s term loangoverning instrument. This could result in different financial performance for existing transactions, require different hedging strategies and subsequently terminated $800.0 millionrequire renegotiation for existing instruments. In addition, the transition from LIBOR could have a significant impact on the overall interest rate environment. While we do not expect the transition from LIBOR and the risks related thereto to have a material adverse effect on us, it remains uncertain at this time.
Our borrowing costs and access to capital and credit markets could be adversely affected by a downgrade or potential downgrade of our credit ratings.
Rating agencies routinely evaluate us, and their ratings of our long-term and short-term debt are based upon a number of factors, including our cash generating capability, levels of indebtedness, policies with respect to shareholder distributions and financial strength generally, as well as factors beyond our control, such as the then-current state of the Company’s related long-term interest rate swap agreements. After giving effecteconomy and our industry generally. Any downgrade of our credit ratings by a credit rating agency, whether as a result of our actions or factors which are beyond our control, can increase our future borrowing costs, impair our ability to these transactions, each one hundred basis points change in LIBOR rates wouldaccess capital and credit markets on terms commercially acceptable to us or at all and result in an approximate $11.0 million changea reduction in the annual cash interest expense, before any principal payment,our liquidity. Our borrowing costs and access to capital markets also can be adversely affected if a credit rating agency announces that our ratings are under review for a potential downgrade. An increase in our borrowing costs, limitations on our ability to access the global capital and credit markets or a reduction in our liquidity can adversely affect our financial instruments with exposure to interest rate risk.condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Your percentage ownership in Post may be diluted in the future.
As with any publicly tradedpublicly-traded company, our shareholders’ percentage ownership in Post may be diluted in the future because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise, including equity awards that we expect will be granted to our directors, officers and employees and the accelerated vesting of otherthose equity awards. For a more detailed descriptionbrief discussion of our equity incentive plan, see “Executive Compensation”Note 20 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 118 of this report.
The market priceand trading volume of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including in response to the risks and uncertainties discussed in this report or for reasons unrelated to our performance, such as reports by industry analysts, investor perceptions or negative developments relating to our customers, competitors or suppliers, as well as general economic and industry conditions.
Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws and provisions of Missouri law may prevent or delay an acquisitionof the Company, which could decrease the trading price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated articles of incorporation (as amended, the “articles of incorporation”), our amended and restated bylaws (the “bylaws”) and Missouri law contain provisions intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive and incentivizing prospective acquirers to negotiate with our Board of Directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:
the•our Board of Directors is divided into three classes with staggered terms;
the•our Board of Directors fixes the number of members on the Board;
•elimination of the rights of our shareholders to act by written consent (except when such consent is unanimous) and to call shareholder meetings;
•rules regarding how shareholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at shareholder meetings;
•the right of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval;
•supermajority vote requirements for certain amendments to our articles of incorporation and bylaws;
•anti-takeover provisions of Missouri law which may prevent us from engaging in a business combination with an interested shareholder, or which may deter third parties from acquiring amounts of our common stock above certain thresholds; and
•limitations on the right of shareholders to remove directors.
General Risk Factors
The market priceand trading volume of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including in response to the risks and uncertainties discussed in this report, announcements we make about our business, variations in our quarterly results of operations and those of our competitors, market data that is available to subscribers, reports by industry analysts, whether or not we meet the financial estimates of analysts who follow us, industry or market trends, investor perceptions, actions by credit rating agencies, future sales of our common stock or negative developments relating to our customers, competitors or suppliers, as well as general economic and industry conditions, including those that result from the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a result of these factors, investors in our common stock may not be able to resell their shares at or above the price at which they purchase our common stock. In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of individual companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In addition, in the past, some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have been subject to class action or derivative lawsuits. The filing of a lawsuit against us, regardless of the outcome, could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as it could result in substantial legal costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
Changes in tax laws may adversely affect us, and the Internal Revenue Service or a court may disagree with our tax positions, which may result in adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
There can be no assurance that future tax law changes will not increase the rate of the corporate income tax significantly; impose new limitations on deductions, credits or other tax benefits; or make other changes that may adversely affect the performance of an investment in our stock. Furthermore, there is no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or a court will agree with the positions taken by us, in which case tax penalties and interest may be imposed that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If we are unable to continue to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned, and our stock price may suffer.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) requires any company subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws to perform a comprehensive evaluation of its and its consolidated subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we are required to document and test our internal control procedures, our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to issue an opinion on its audit of our internal control over financial reporting.
BellRing, as a publicly-traded company, also is separately subject to SOX. As an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, BellRing’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under SOX. However, if BellRing ceases to be an “emerging growth company,” it will be subject to this requirement under SOX. Further, if BellRing does not satisfy the requirements imposed by SOX, or if its internal control over financial reporting is not effective, it will impact our ability to satisfy our SOX requirements and could impair the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards under the rules. During the course of its testing, our management may identify material weaknesses or significant deficiencies which may not be remedied in time to meet the annual deadline imposed by SOX. If our management cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies material weaknesses in our internal controls, investor confidence in our financial results may weaken, and our stock price may consequently suffer. In addition, in the event that we do not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we might fail to timely prevent or detect potential financial misstatements. As of September 30, 2020, management determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Actions of shareholders could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources and have an adverse effect on our business.
From time to time, we may be subject to proposals and other requests from shareholders urging us to take certain corporate actions, including proposals seeking to influence our corporate policies or effecting a change in our management. In the event of such shareholder proposals, particularly with respect to matters which our management and Board of Directors, in exercising their fiduciary duties, disagree with or have determined not to pursue, our business could be adversely affected because responding to actions and requests of shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupting our operations and diverting the
attention of management and our employees. Additionally, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction may result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel, business partners and customers.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own our principal executive offices and lease corporate administrative offices in St. Louis, Missouri. The general offices and locationlocations of our principal operations for each of our businesses are set forth in the summary below. We also lease sales offices mainly in the United StatesU.S. and maintain a number of stand-alone distribution facilities. In addition, there is on-site warehouse space available at many of our manufacturing facilities. Utilizationfacilities, and in addition to the owned and leased warehouse space discussed below, we contract for the usage of manufacturing capacity varies by manufacturing plant based upon the type of products assigned and the level of demand for those products.additional warehouse space on an as needed basis, as appropriate.
We own many of our manufacturing facilities. Certain of our owned real properties are subject to mortgages or other applicable security interests pursuant to our financing arrangements. Management believes our facilities generally are in good operating condition and, taken as a whole and in conjunction with our arrangements with third party manufacturers, are suitable, adequate and adequate for the purposes for which they are used and are adequately maintained. We generally believe our facilities, with our announced plans for expansion, provide adequateof sufficient capacity for our current operations. Utilization of manufacturing capacity varies by manufacturing facility based upon the type of products assigned and anticipated future customer demand.the level of demand for those products.
Post Consumer Brands
The main administrative office for Post Consumer Brands, which we own, is located in Lakeville, Minnesota. Post Consumer Brands also leases administrative office space in Bentonville, ArkansasArkansas; Cincinnati, Ohio and Toronto, Canada.Ontario.
Post Consumer Brands has nineeight owned manufacturing facilities located in Asheboro, North Carolina; Battle Creek, Michigan; Clinton, Massachusetts; Jonesboro, Arkansas; Niagara Falls, Ontario; Northfield, Minnesota (which consists of two facilities and also includes warehouse space); St. Ansgar, Iowa;Iowa and Tremonton, Utah and two facilities, in addition to warehouse space, in Northfield, Minnesota.Utah. Post Consumer Brands also leases land for another owned manufacturing facility located in Cobourg, Ontario. Post Consumer Brands maintains approximately 4.44.5 million square feet of warehouse and distribution space throughout the United StatesU.S. and Canada, approximately 1.00.8 million of which is owned by us and approximately 3.43.7 million of which is leased by us.
Weetabix
Weetabix has fourthree owned manufacturing facilities in the U.K. in Burton Latimer, Corby and Ashton-under-Lyne.Ashton-under-Lyne, each of which includes warehousing space. In addition, Weetabix’s joint ventures in Kenya and South Africa each ownowns a manufacturing facility in those respective countries. Weetabix also leases office space in the United Arab Emirates, Spain and China, and leases warehouse space in China.
Refrigerated FoodFoodservice
The Refrigerated FoodFoodservice segment has leased administrative offices which are leased, in Minnetonka, Minnesota; New Albany, Ohio and Rogers, Arkansas. Refrigerated Food has eightMinnesota. Operations for our Foodservice segment include ten owned egg products production facilities in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska and Oregon, and leases facilities forfour leased egg products production facilities in Iowa, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and South Dakota. Additionally, theThe egg products business owns eight layer facilities in the United States.U.S. Operations for our Foodservice segment include two owned potato processing facilities in Mars Hill, Maine and Chaska, Minnesota, two owned meat products processing and production facilities in Norfolk, Nebraska and Ravenna, Nebraska, three owned facilities in Hillsdale, Michigan, Sulphur Springs, Texas and Xenia, Ohio discussed in Refrigerated FoodRetail below that also ownsare used for foodservice meat products processing and production, a leased potato processing facility in North Las Vegas, Nevada and one leased facility in Lima, Ohio discussed in Refrigerated Retail below that also is used for foodservice potato and side dish production.
Refrigerated Retail
The Refrigerated Retail segment has leased administrative offices in New Albany, Ohio and also uses some of the leased administrative office space in Minnetonka, Minnesota previously referenced in Foodservice above. In addition to certain of the egg products production facilities previously referenced for our Foodservice business, our Refrigerated Retail operations include owned sausage production plants in Hillsdale, Michigan and Xenia, Ohio. The Refrigerated Food business ownsIn addition to the facilities in Chaska, Minnesota and Mars Hill, Maine as well as leases a facility in North Las Vegas, Nevada,previously referenced for its refrigerated potato products business.our Foodservice business, our Refrigerated Food also leasesRetail operations include an owned manufacturing plantsplant in Sulphur Springs, Texas, which produces ready-to-eat products such as sandwiches, soups and gravies, and Lima, Ohio, which produces refrigerated mashed potatoes and other potato-based side dishes macaroni and cheeseprecooked sausage products, and other pastaa leased potato and side dishes. In addition,dish processing facility in Lima, Ohio. Refrigerated Food owns aRetail uses an owned transportation facility in Springfield, Ohio and leases a leased transportation facility in Sunnyvale, Texas. The Refrigerated FoodRetail segment alsoadditionally owns a cheese processing and packaging facility and warehouse in Lake Mills, Wisconsin for its cheese and other dairy-case products business.
BellRing Brands
The Active Nutrition segment’s PNCBellRing Brands segment leases research and development facilities and administrative offices which are leased, are located in Emeryville, California. PNC also leases officesCalifornia and a development kitchen in Boise, Idaho. The Dymatize business has a leasedDallas, Texas and an administrative office in Dallas, Texas. Additionally, Active Nutrition owns a manufacturing facility in Voerde, Germany and leasesRogers, Arkansas. The BellRing Brands business also uses administrative office space in Munich, Germany; Bern, SwitzerlandSt. Louis, Missouri pursuant to a master services agreement by and Manchesteramong Post, BellRing and BellRing Brands, LLC entered into in connection with the U.K.
PrivateIPO and the formation transactions. The BellRing Brands
Our historical Private Brands business owns manufacturing facilities in Fitzgerald, Georgia, which are used for peanut butter production and peanut blanching; in Carrington, North Dakota and New Hope, Minnesota, which are used for pasta production; and in Eugene, Oregon, which is used for granola production. Additionally, our historical Private Brands business leases manufacturing facilities in Blaine, Washington; Troy, Alabama; Markham, Ontario; Brampton, Ontario and Burnaby, British Columbia for nut butter and dried fruit and nut production. The historical Private Brands business also segment leases administrative offices in Eugene, Oregon; St. Louis, MissouriMunich, Germany and Burnaby, British Columbia. Effective October 1, 2018,Worb, Switzerland. In addition, the BellRing Brands segment leases warehouse space in connectionTagelswangen, Switzerland and, through third party logistics firms, a distribution center with the transactionwarehouse space in Kleve, Germany and warehouse space in Farmers Branch, Texas. The BellRing Brands business manufactures protein and energy bars and gels and conducts research and development through an owned facility in Voerde, Germany.
to separately capitalize 8th Avenue described under “Business” in Item 1 of this report, these properties are directly or indirectly owned or leased by 8th Avenue, of which Post owns 60.5% of the common equity.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Antitrust claims
In late 2008 and early 2009, some 22 class action lawsuits were filedFor information regarding our legal proceedings, refer to “Legal Proceedings” in various federal courts against Michael Foods, Inc. (“MFI”),Note 18 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference. For the disclosure of environmental proceedings with a wholly-owned subsidiarygovernmental entity as a party pursuant to Item 103(c)(3)(iii) of Regulation S-K, the Company and some 20 other defendants (producers of shell eggs and egg products, and egg industry organizations), alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws in connection withhas elected to disclose matters where the production and sale of shell eggs and egg products, and seeking unspecified damages. All cases were transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated and/or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
The case involved three plaintiff groups: (1) a nationwide class of direct purchasers of shell eggs (“direct purchaser class”); (2) individual companies (primarily large grocery chains and food companies that purchase considerable quantities of eggs) that opted out of various settlements and filed their own complaints related to their purchases of shell eggs and egg products (“opt-out plaintiffs”); and (3) indirect purchasers of shell eggs (“indirect purchaser plaintiffs”).
Resolution of claims: (1) In December 2016, MFI settled all claims asserted against it by the direct purchaser class for a payment of $75.0 million, which was approved by the district court in December 2017; (2) MFI settled all claims asserted against it by opt-out plaintiffs related to shell egg purchases on confidential terms in January 2017; and (3) in June 2018, MFI settled all claims asserted against it by indirect purchaser plaintiffs on confidential terms. MFI has at all times denied liability in this matter, and no settlement contains any admission of liability by MFI.
Remaining portion of the case: MFI remains a defendant only with respect to claims that seek damages based on purchases of egg products by opt-out plaintiffs. The district court had granted summary judgment precluding any claims for egg products purchases by opt-out plaintiffs, but the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded these claims for further pre-trial proceedings. Defendants have filed a second motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the claims, and that motion is currently pending.
Although the likelihood of a material adverse outcome in the egg antitrust litigation has been significantly reduced as a result of the MFI settlements described above, the remaining portion of the case could stillCompany reasonably believes such proceeding would result in a material adverse outcome.
Bob Evans Appraisal Proceedings
Prior to completionmonetary sanctions, exclusive of the Company’s acquisition of Bob Evans on January 12, 2018, Bob Evans received demands from certain stockholders demanding appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock. After the completion of the acquisition, several such former stockholders filed petitions in the Delaware Court of Chancery (Arbitrage Fund v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. filed on January 23, 2018; Blue Mountain Credit Alternatives Master Fund L.P., et al. v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. filed on April 30, 2018;interest and2017 Clarendon LLC, et al. v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. filed on April 30, 2018) seeking appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock pursuant to Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“Section 262”). The lawsuits seek appraisal for such shares, plus statutory interest, as well as the costs, of the proceedings and such other relief as appropriate. Under Section 262, persons who were stockholders at the time of the closing are entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and receive payment of the “fair value” of such shares (plus statutory interest) as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery so long as such persons comply with applicable procedural requirements. By virtue of these lawsuits, approximately 3.3$1.0 million shares of Bob Evans common stock (which were held by such former stockholders) are before the court for appraisal. As of completion of the acquisition, former Bob Evans stockholders can no longer submit new demands for appraisal. All other former stockholders have been paid for their shares at the $77.00 per share merger consideration amount. The Company intends to vigorously defend the cases.or more.
Other
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon the information presently known, the ultimate liability, if any, arising from such pending legal proceedings, as well as from asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims which are likely to be asserted, taking into account established accruals for estimated liabilities (if any), are not expected to be material individually or in the aggregate to the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. In addition, although it is difficult to estimate the potential financial impact of actions regarding expenditures for compliance with regulatory matters, in the opinion of management, based upon the information currently available, the ultimate liability arising from such compliance matters is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSUREDISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
| |
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for Common Stock and Dividends
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “POST.”“POST”. There were approximately 5,0504,730 shareholders of record on November 1, 2018.16, 2020. We did not pay any cash dividends on our common stock during the years ended September 30, 20182020 or 2017.2019. We have no plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, and the indentures governing our debt securities and our credit facilities restrict our ability to pay dividends. The information required under this Item 5 concerning equity compensation plan information is set out under Item 12 of this report and is incorporated herein by this reference.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There were no purchasesThe following table sets forth information with respect to shares of equity securities by the issuer or affiliated purchasersour common stock that we purchased during the fourthfiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share (a) | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (b) | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (a) (b) |
| July 1, 2020 - July 31, 2020 | 169,084 | | $88.40 | 169,084 | | $113,752,754 |
| August 1, 2020 - August 31, 2020 | 589,780 | | $87.70 | 589,780 | | $348,275,686 |
| September 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020 | 688,253 | | $85.41 | 688,253 | | $289,492,057 |
| Total | 1,447,117 | | $86.69 | 1,447,117 | | $289,492,057 |
(a)Does not include broker’s commissions.
(b)On December 5, 2019, our Board of fiscal 2018.Directors approved an authorization for the Company to repurchase up to $400,000,000 of shares of our common stock effective December 5, 2019 (the “Prior Authorization”), and the Company began repurchasing shares under the Prior Authorization on December 6, 2019. The Prior Authorization had an expiration date of December 5, 2021. On August 4, 2020, our Board of Directors terminated the Prior Authorization effective August 7, 2020 and approved a new authorization for the Company to repurchase up to $400,000,000 of shares of our common stock effective August 8, 2020 (the “New Authorization”). The New Authorization expires on August 8, 2022. Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, in private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic purchase transactions, or otherwise. As of August 7, 2020, the approximate dollar value of shares that could yet be repurchased under the Prior Authorization was $113,752,754.
Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the changes, for the period indicated, in the cumulative total value of $100 hypothetically invested in each of (a)(i) Post common stock, (b)stock; (ii) the Russell 1000 index,index; (iii) the S&P 1500 Packaged Foods & Meats Index; and (c)(iv) a peer group composed of 1211 United States-based public companies in the food and consumer packaged goods industries.industries (the “Fiscal 2019 Peer Group”).
The peer groupFiscal 2019 Peer Group companies are: B&G Foods, Inc.; Brown-Forman Corporation; Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Consolidated, Inc.; Cott Corporation; Darling InternationalIngredients Inc.; Flowers Foods, Inc.; The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.; J&J Snack Foods Corp.; Pinnacle Foods Inc.Primo Water Corporation (formerly Cott Corporation); Sanderson Farms, Inc.; SunoptaSunOpta Inc. and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. wasGoing forward, the Fiscal 2019 Peer Group will be replaced by the S&P 1500 Packaged Foods & Meats Index to provide a broader representation of our industry peers and will be removed from the peer group for the most recent period as it was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a publicly traded company.this performance graph.
This graph covers the period from September 30, 20132015 through September 28, 2018.30, 2020.
* $100 invested on 9/30/1315 in stock or index.
Performance Graph Data
| | | | | | | | | Post ($) | | Russell 1000 Index ($) | | S&P 1500 Packaged Foods & Meats Index ($) | | Fiscal 2019 Peer Group ($) |
| | Post ($) | | Russell 1000 Index ($) | | Peer Group ($) | |
| 9/30/2013 | 100.00 |
| | 100.00 |
| | 100.00 |
| |
| 9/30/2014 | 82.19 |
| | 116.70 |
| | 112.39 |
| |
| 9/30/2015 | 146.40 |
| | 113.73 |
| | 127.72 |
| 9/30/2015 | 100.00 | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 | |
| 9/30/2016 | 191.16 |
| | 127.97 |
| | 131.57 |
| 9/30/2016 | 130.58 | | | 114.92 | | | 119.76 | | | 97.16 | |
| 9/29/2017 | 218.65 |
| | 148.69 |
| | 150.27 |
| 9/29/2017 | 149.36 | | | 136.22 | | | 112.97 | | | 109.95 | |
| 9/28/2018 | 242.85 |
| | 171.85 |
| | 150.65 |
| 9/28/2018 | 165.89 | | | 160.40 | | | 110.78 | | | 103.03 | |
| 9/30/2019 | | 9/30/2019 | 179.09 | | | 166.61 | | | 126.32 | | | 117.74 | |
| 9/30/2020 | | 9/30/2020 | 145.52 | | | 193.27 | | | 131.41 | | | 134.34 | |
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
The information required under this Item 5 concerning equity compensation plan information is set out below under Item 12
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(in millions, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | | Year Ended September 30, | | 2020 (a) | | 2019 (a) | | 2018 (a) | | 2017 (a) | | 2016 (a) |
| (dollars in millions, except per share data) | | 2018 (a) | | 2017 (a) | | 2016 (a) | | 2015 (a) | | 2014 (a) | |
| Statements of Operations Data | | | | | | | | | | | Statements of Operations Data | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | | $ | 6,257.2 |
| | $ | 5,225.8 |
| | $ | 5,026.8 |
| | $ | 4,648.2 |
| | $ | 2,411.1 |
| |
| Cost of goods sold | | 4,390.4 |
| | 3,651.7 |
| | 3,479.4 |
| | 3,473.8 |
| | 1,789.9 |
| |
| Net sales (b) | | Net sales (b) | | $ | 5,698.7 | | | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 6,257.2 | | | $ | 5,225.8 | | | $ | 5,026.8 | |
| Cost of goods sold (c) | | Cost of goods sold (c) | | 3,911.3 | | | 3,889.0 | | | 4,403.2 | | | 3,655.0 | | | 3,476.3 | |
| Gross profit | | 1,866.8 |
| | 1,574.1 |
| | 1,547.4 |
| | 1,174.4 |
| | 621.2 |
| Gross profit | | 1,787.4 | | | 1,792.1 | | | 1,854.0 | | | 1,570.8 | | | 1,550.5 | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 975.2 |
| | 867.4 |
| | 839.7 |
| | 734.1 |
| | 459.5 |
| |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses (b)(c) | | Selling, general and administrative expenses (b)(c) | | 934.3 | | | 911.6 | | | 976.4 | | | 867.7 | | | 839.7 | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | | 177.4 |
| | 159.1 |
| | 152.6 |
| | 141.7 |
| | 70.8 |
| Amortization of intangible assets | | 160.3 | | | 161.3 | | | 177.4 | | | 159.1 | | | 152.6 | |
| Gain on sale of business (d) | | Gain on sale of business (d) | | — | | | (126.6) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets (b)(e) | | 124.9 |
| | 26.5 |
| | — |
| | 60.8 |
| | 295.6 |
| | — | | | 63.3 | | | 124.9 | | | 26.5 | | | — | |
| Other operating expenses, net | | 1.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 9.4 |
| | 25.1 |
| | 3.0 |
| |
| Operating profit (loss) | | 587.5 |
| | 520.3 |
| | 545.7 |
| | 212.7 |
| | (207.7 | ) | |
| Other operating (income) expenses, net (f) | | Other operating (income) expenses, net (f) | | (7.7) | | | 1.5 | | | 1.8 | | | 0.8 | | | 9.4 | |
| Operating profit | | Operating profit | | 700.5 | | | 781.0 | | | 573.5 | | | 516.7 | | | 548.8 | |
| Interest expense, net | | 387.3 |
| | 314.8 |
| | 306.5 |
| | 257.5 |
| | 183.7 |
| Interest expense, net | | 388.6 | | | 322.4 | | | 387.3 | | | 314.8 | | | 306.5 | |
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net (c)(g) | | 31.1 |
| | 222.9 |
| | 86.4 |
| | 30.0 |
| | — |
| | 72.9 | | | 6.1 | | | 31.1 | | | 222.9 | | | 86.4 | |
| (Income) expense on swaps, net (d) | | (95.6 | ) | | (91.8 | ) | | 182.9 |
| | 92.5 |
| | 35.5 |
| |
| Expense (income) on swaps, net (h) | | Expense (income) on swaps, net (h) | | 187.1 | | | 306.6 | | | (95.6) | | | (91.8) | | | 182.9 | |
| Other (income) expense, net (c) | | Other (income) expense, net (c) | | (11.5) | | | (13.2) | | | (14.0) | | | (3.6) | | | 3.1 | |
| Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity method loss | | 264.7 |
| | 74.4 |
| | (30.1 | ) | | (167.3 | ) | | (426.9 | ) | Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity method loss | | 63.4 | | | 159.1 | | | 264.7 | | | 74.4 | | | (30.1) | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense (e) | | (204.0 | ) | | 26.1 |
| | (26.8 | ) | | (52.0 | ) | | (83.7 | ) | |
| Equity method loss, net of tax (f) | | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Income tax expense (benefit) (i) | | Income tax expense (benefit) (i) | | 3.5 | | | (3.9) | | | (204.0) | | | 26.1 | | | (26.8) | |
| Equity method loss, net of tax (j) | | Equity method loss, net of tax (j) | | 30.9 | | | 37.0 | | | 0.3 | | | — | | | — | |
| Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interest | | 468.4 |
| | 48.3 |
| | (3.3 | ) | | (115.3 | ) | | (343.2 | ) | Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interest | | 29.0 | | | 126.0 | | | 468.4 | | | 48.3 | | | (3.3) | |
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest (f) | | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest (j) | | Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest (j) | | 28.2 | | | 1.3 | | | 1.1 | | | — | | | — | |
| Net earnings (loss) | | 467.3 |
| | 48.3 |
| | (3.3 | ) | | (115.3 | ) | | (343.2 | ) | Net earnings (loss) | | 0.8 | | | 124.7 | | | 467.3 | | | 48.3 | | | (3.3) | |
| Preferred stock dividends | | (10.0 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | (25.1 | ) | | (17.0 | ) | | (15.4 | ) | |
| Less: Preferred stock dividends | | Less: Preferred stock dividends | | — | | | 3.0 | | | 10.0 | | | 13.5 | | | 25.1 | |
| Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders | | $ | 457.3 |
| | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | (28.4 | ) | | $ | (132.3 | ) | | $ | (358.6 | ) | Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 121.7 | | | $ | 457.3 | | | $ | 34.8 | | | $ | (28.4) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | |
| Basic | | $ | 6.87 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | (0.41 | ) | | $ | (2.33 | ) | | $ | (9.03 | ) | Basic | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 1.72 | | | $ | 6.87 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | (0.41) | |
| Diluted | | $ | 6.16 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | (0.41 | ) | | $ | (2.33 | ) | | $ | (9.03 | ) | Diluted | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 1.66 | | | $ | 6.16 | | | $ | 0.50 | | | $ | (0.41) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Statements of Cash Flows Data | | | | | | | | | | | Statements of Cash Flows Data | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 398.4 |
| | $ | 323.1 |
| | $ | 302.8 |
| | $ | 272.8 |
| | $ | 155.8 |
| Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 370.3 | | | $ | 379.6 | | | $ | 398.4 | | | $ | 323.1 | | | $ | 302.8 | |
| Cash provided (used) by: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating activities | | $ | 719.3 |
| | $ | 386.7 |
| | $ | 502.4 |
| | $ | 451.6 |
| | $ | 163.0 |
| |
| Investing activities | | (1,676.9 | ) | | (2,090.8 | ) | | (196.1 | ) | | (1,248.7 | ) | | (3,793.6 | ) | |
| Cash provided by (used in): | | Cash provided by (used in): | |
| Operating activities (k) | | Operating activities (k) | | $ | 625.6 | | | $ | 688.0 | | | $ | 718.6 | | | $ | 386.7 | | | $ | 502.4 | |
| Investing activities (k) | | Investing activities (k) | | (218.5) | | | 26.7 | | | (1,675.6) | | | (2,095.0) | | | (206.5) | |
| Financing activities | | 423.4 |
| | 2,053.1 |
| | (4.5 | ) | | 1,372.4 |
| | 3,504.3 |
| Financing activities | | (272.0) | | | (652.4) | | | 423.4 | | | 2,053.1 | | | (4.5) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | | | | | | Balance Sheet Data | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 989.7 |
| | $ | 1,525.9 |
| | $ | 1,143.6 |
| | $ | 841.4 |
| | $ | 268.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,187.9 | | | $ | 1,050.7 | | | $ | 989.7 | | | $ | 1,525.9 | | | $ | 1,143.6 | |
| Working capital (excluding cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and current portion of long-term debt) | | 435.8 |
| | 403.5 |
| | 303.2 |
| | 317.6 |
| | 362.3 |
| |
| Total assets | | 13,057.5 |
| | 11,876.8 |
| | 9,360.6 |
| | 9,163.9 |
| | 7,669.0 |
| |
| Working capital (excluding cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and current portion of long-term debt) (l) | | Working capital (excluding cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and current portion of long-term debt) (l) | | 184.9 | | | 282.4 | | | 435.8 | | | 403.5 | | | 303.2 | |
| Total assets (l) | | Total assets (l) | | 12,146.7 | | | 11,951.6 | | | 13,057.5 | | | 11,876.8 | | | 9,360.6 | |
| Debt, including short-term portion and amounts held for sale | | 7,868.8 |
| | 7,171.2 |
| | 4,563.5 |
| | 4,470.9 |
| | 3,794.0 |
| Debt, including short-term portion and amounts held for sale | | 7,023.9 | | | 7,079.5 | | | 7,868.8 | | | 7,171.2 | | | 4,563.5 |
| Other liabilities | | 499.3 |
| | 327.8 |
| | 440.3 |
| | 290.2 |
| | 182.4 |
| |
| Other liabilities (l) | | Other liabilities (l) | | 599.8 | | | 456.9 | | | 499.3 | | | 327.8 | | | 440.3 |
| Total shareholders’ equity | | 3,060.5 |
| | 2,789.7 |
| | 3,008.6 |
| | 2,976.0 |
| | 2,283.2 |
| Total shareholders’ equity | | 2,829.0 | | | 2,937.3 | | | 3,060.5 | | | 2,789.7 | | | 3,008.6 | |
____________
| |
(a) | The data in these columns include results from acquisitions from the respective date of acquisition through September 30, 2018, as well as results from fiscal 2016 and 2015 divestitures from October 1, 2014 through the date of sale. For more information on our 2018, 2017 and 2016 acquisitions, see Note(a) The data in these columns include results from acquisitions from the respective date of acquisition through September 30, 2020, as well as results from divestitures through the date of sale or deconsolidation. For more information on our fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018 transactions, see Notes 4 and 6 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In fiscal 2017, the Company acquired Latimer Newco 2 Limited (“Latimer”), and all of Latimer’s direct and indirect subsidiaries at the time of acquisition, including Weetabix Limited, as well as National Pasteurized Eggs, Inc. In fiscal 2016, the Company acquired Willamette Egg Farms, LLC and sold certain assets of its Michael Foods Canadian egg business. In fiscal 2015, the Company acquired the PowerBar and Musashi brands, ABC and MOM Brands, and sold the PowerBar Australia assets and the Musashi trademark. In fiscal 2014, the Company acquired Dakota Growers, Dymatize, Golden Boy and Michael Foods. |
| |
(b) | For information about the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and Notes 2 and 7 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $57.0 million related to its Active Nutrition segment, as well as impairment losses of $3.7 million and $0.1 million related to the Grape-Nuts brand and the 100% Bran brand, respectively. In the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $181.3 million and $31.3 million related to its Post Consumer Brands and Active Nutrition segments, respectively, as well as impairment losses of $34.4 million for the Post brand, $23.0 million for the Honey Bunches of Oats brand, $17.2 million for the PostShredded Wheat brand and $8.4 million for the Grape-Nuts brand.
|
| |
(c) | For information about losses on extinguishment of debt, net for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, see Note 16 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company expensed $30.0 million of debt issuance costs and unamortized debt discount related to the repayment of a portion its prior term loan. |
| |
(d) | For information about (income) expense on swaps, net for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, Post recorded expense of $92.5 million and $35.5 million, respectively, related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments on its interest rate swaps. |
| |
(e) | In fiscal 2018, the effective tax rate was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017. For information about income tax (benefit) expense, see Note 9 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” |
| |
(f) | For information about equity method investments, see Note 8 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” |
(b) On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” using the modified retrospective method of adoption. Therefore, “Net sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” for the years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 are presented under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and “Net sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” for the years ended
September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are presented under ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.” For additional information about revenue recognition, see Note 2 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
| |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
(c) On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” using the retrospective method of adoption. For the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the adoption of ASU 2017-07 resulted in increases (decreases) in “Cost of goods sold” of $12.8, $3.3 and $(3.1), respectively, and increases in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” of $1.2, $0.3 and zero, respectively, and corresponding increases in other income of $14.0 and $3.6 for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and in other expense of $3.1 for the year ended September 30, 2016, which are reported in “Other (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(d) For information about “Gain on sale of business” for fiscal 2019, see Note 6 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
(e) For information about “Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets” for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, see “Critical Accounting Estimates” within “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report and Notes 2 and 7 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a charge of $26.5 for the impairment of goodwill related to the BellRing Brands segment (historically referred to as the Active Nutrition segment).
(f) In fiscal 2020, “Other operating (income) expenses, net” was impacted by the recognition of a gain on bargain purchase in connection with the acquisition of Henningsen Foods, Inc. For more information on the acquisition and the related gain on bargain purchase, see Note 4 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
(g) For information about “Loss on extinguishment of debt, net” for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, see Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company expensed $222.9, which included premiums and the write-offs of debt issuance costs, partially offset by the write-off of unamortized debt premiums. In the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company expensed $86.4, which included a premium paid and write-offs of debt issuance costs and unamortized debt discount, partially offset by the write-off of unamortized debt premium.
(h) For information about “Expense (income) on swaps, net” for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, see Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded income of $91.8 related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments on its interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps and foreign exchange forward contracts, as well as cash settlements on its interest rate swaps. In the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded expense of $182.9 related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments and cash settlements on its interest rate swaps.
(i) In fiscal 2020, the Company’s accounting for income taxes was impacted by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, which was enacted on March 27, 2020. In fiscal 2018, the effective tax rate was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017. For information about “Income tax expense (benefit),” see Note 9 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
(j) For information about equity interests, see Note 8 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
(k) On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” using the retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 resulted in a decrease in net cash provided by operating activities of $0.7 for the year ended September 30, 2018 and a (decrease) increase in net cash used by investing activities of $(1.3), $4.2 and $10.4 for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(l) On October 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.” At adoption, the Company recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of $158.1 and $168.2, respectively, on the balance sheet at October 1, 2019. For additional information about the adoption of these ASUs, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and Notes 2, 3 and 16within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the consolidated operating results, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources of Post Holdings, Inc. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements under Item 8 of this report and the “Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements” on page 1.1 of this report.
OVERVIEW
We are a consumer packaged goods holding company, operating in five reportable segments as of September 30, 2018:segments: Post Consumer Brands, Weetabix, Foodservice, Refrigerated Food, Active NutritionRetail and PrivateBellRing Brands. Our products are sold through a variety of channels, such asincluding grocery, club and drug stores, mass merchandisers, foodservice, food ingredient and e-commerce.eCommerce.
At September 30, 2020, our reportable segments were as follows:
•Post Consumer Brands: North American ready-to-eat (“RTE”) cereal;
•Weetabix: primarily United Kingdom RTE cereal and muesli;
•Foodservice: primarily egg and potato products;
•Refrigerated Retail: primarily side dish, egg, cheese and sausage products; and
•BellRing Brands: ready-to-drink (“RTD”) protein shakes, other RTD beverages, powders and nutrition bars.
Transactions
Initial Public Offering of BellRing Brands, Inc,
On October 21, 2019, BellRing Brands, Inc. (“BellRing”), our subsidiary, closed its initial public offering (the “IPO”) of 39.4 million shares of its Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class A Common Stock”). The IPO was completed at an offering price of $14.00 per share and BellRing received net proceeds from the IPO of $524.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. As a result of the IPO and certain other transactions completed in connection with the IPO (the “formation transactions”), BellRing is a publicly-traded company whose Class A Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “BRBR”. BellRing is a holding company of BellRing Brands, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“BellRing LLC”), owning 28.8% of its non-voting membership units (the “BellRing LLC units”). We own 71.2% of the BellRing LLC units and one share of BellRing’s Class B common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class B Common Stock” and, collectively with the Class A Common Stock, the “BellRing Common Stock”). The Class B Common Stock has voting rights but no rights to dividends or other economic rights. For so long as we and our affiliates (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) directly own more than 50% of the BellRing LLC units, the Class B Common Stock represents 67% of the combined voting power of the BellRing Common Stock. BellRing LLC is the holding company for our historical active nutrition business, reported herein as the BellRing Brands segment and reported historically as the Active Nutrition segment.
Effective October 21, 2019, the financial results of BellRing and its subsidiaries were consolidated within our financial results and 28.8% of the consolidated net income and net assets of BellRing and its subsidiaries, representing the percentage of economic interest in BellRing LLC held by BellRing (and therefore indirectly held by the public stockholders of BellRing through their ownership of the Class A Common Stock), was allocated to noncontrolling interest. The term “BellRing” as used herein generally refers to BellRing Brands, Inc.; however, in discussions related to debt facilities and interest rate swaps, the term “BellRing” refers to BellRing Brands, LLC. For additional information, see Notes 1, 8 and 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Capitalization of 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc.
On October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”) was separately capitalized by us and third parties through a series of transactions (the “8th Avenue Transactions”), and 8th Avenue became the holding company for our historical private brands business, reported historically as our Private Brands segment. We retained shares of common stock equal to 60.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue. 8th Avenue is no longer consolidated in our financial statements and the 60.5% common equity retained interest in 8th Avenue is accounted for using the equity method. For additional information, see Notes 6 and 8 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Acquisitions
We completed the following acquisitions during fiscal 2018, 2017the reporting period:
•Henningsen Foods, Inc. (“Henningsen”) acquired July 1, 2020 and 2016:reported in our Foodservice segment; and
•Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Bob Evans”), acquired January 12, 2018 and reported in our Foodservice and Refrigerated Food segment.Retail segments.
Fiscal 2017COVID-19
National Pasteurized Eggs, Inc. (“NPE”), acquired October 3, 2016The COVID-19 pandemic has caused and reportedcontinues to cause global economic disruption and uncertainty, including in our Refrigerated Food segment; and
Latimer Newco 2 Limited (“Latimer”), and all of Latimer’s direct and indirect subsidiaries atbusiness. We are closely monitoring the time of acquisition, including Weetabix Limited (collectively the “Weetabix Group”), acquired July 3, 2017. The resultsimpact of the Weetabix Group’s operations outsideCOVID-19 pandemic and developments related thereto and are taking necessary actions to ensure our ability to safeguard the health of North America (“Weetabix”) are reported as our Weetabix segmentemployees, including their economic health, maintain the continuity of our supply chain to serve customers and consumers and preserve financial liquidity to navigate the Weetabix Group’s North American operations (“Weetabix NA”) are reporteduncertainty caused by the pandemic. Examples of actions we have taken in our Post Consumer Brands segment.
Fiscal 2016
Willamette Egg Farms (“WEF”), acquired October 3, 2015 and reported in our Refrigerated Food segment.
Dueresponse to the levelpandemic include:
•reinforcing manufacturing facilities with additional protective supplies, staffing and support;
•enhancing facility safety measures and working closely with public health officials to follow additional health and safety guidelines;
•drawing $500.0 million of integrationour $750.0 million revolving credit facility and $65.0 million of BellRing’s revolving credit facility to further enhance liquidity in March 2020. Borrowings under both credit facilities were repaid prior to the end of fiscal 2020. For additional information, see Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”;
•temporarily suspending our share repurchase program, which we resumed in May 2020. For additional information, see Note 21 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities”in Item 5 of this report;
•actively managing our foodservice egg supply, including taking measures to reduce internal production, delivering contract suspension notices invoking force majeure clauses with respect to certain of our suppliers in the existing businesses,second quarter of fiscal 2020 (subsequently, these contract suspensions were provisionally lifted) and repurposing product into our retail channel; and
•within our foodservice business, where our results continue to be negatively impacted by lower away-from-home demand in various channels, approaching cost reduction in a restrained manner which has preserved our ability to respond quickly as demand resumes. We will manage costs more aggressively if the reduced demand for our foodservice products extends over a longer period.
Since the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the actions of public health and other governmental officials in response to the pandemic, began to impact the categories in which we operate, our products sold through the food, drug and mass, club and eCommerce channels generally experienced an increase in sales as a result of consumer pantry loading in the second quarter of fiscal 2020 and increased at-home consumption that continued throughout the second half of fiscal 2020. However, as a result of increased at-home consumption, we experienced declines in sales of certain discrete financial data for businesses acquiredon-the-go products. We expect some of the benefit of what amounts to a massive trial exercise (as consumers try products that they may not have been purchasing previously) to convert into an intermediate term improvement in category trends across the majority of our retail businesses. However, there is no guarantee that such increase in sales and/or intermediate term improvement in category trends will continue or be realized. Additionally, we have incurred increased expenses specifically attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased employee wages and paid absences, COVID-19 screening expenses, additional sanitizing costs and facility reconfiguration expenses. Our foodservice business has been negatively impacted by lower demand resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various channels, including full service restaurants, quick service restaurants, education and travel and lodging. From April lows, our foodservice volumes improved during the second half of fiscal 2018, 20172020 and 2016 is not available forlargely followed changes in the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017degree of restrictions on mobility and 2016.gatherings. For additional discussion, refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” within this section, as well as “Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements” on page 1 of this report and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report.
Transaction Subsequent to Period EndLease Accounting
On October 1, 2018,2019, we completedadopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.” At adoption, we recognized right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities of $158.1 million and $168.2 million, respectively, on the previously announced transactions (the “8th Avenue Transactions”) pursuant to the Transaction Agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”), dated as of August 2, 2018, among us, 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”) and an affiliate of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. Upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions, 8th Avenue became the holding company for our private brands food products business, and we received total proceeds of $875.0 million, retaining shares of common stock equal to 60.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue.balance sheet at October 1, 2019. For additional information regarding these ASUs, refer to Notes 4, 63 and 16 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”Statements."
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which superseded all previously existing revenue recognition guidance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). As a result of the adoption, we reclassified certain payments to customers from “Selling, general, and “Business”administrative expenses” to “Net Sales” and recognized revenue that was previously deferred in Item 1.
Segment Reorganization
During“Net Sales” in the second quarterConsolidated Statement of fiscal 2018,Operations for the Company reorganized its operating segments, which resulted in reorganized reportable segments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment Reporting.” Atyear ended September 30, 2018,2019. For additional information regarding ASU 2014-09, refer to Note 2 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” The following table presents the Company’s reportable segments were as follows:impact on net sales resulting from the adoption of ASU 2014-09 by segment.
Post Consumer Brands: North American ready-to-eat (“RTE”) cereal business; | | | | | |
| dollars in millions | Year Ended
September 30, 2019 |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | (7.6) | |
| Weetabix | — | |
| Foodservice | (5.2) | |
| Refrigerated Retail | (3.3) | |
| BellRing Brands | (8.8) | |
| $ | (24.9) | |
Weetabix: RTE cereal and the branded muesli business sold and distributed primarily outside of North America;
Refrigerated Food: refrigerated foodservice, primarily egg and potato, and refrigerated retail, inclusive of side dishes, egg, cheese and sausage;
Active Nutrition: protein shakes, bars and powders and nutritional supplements; and
Private Brands: peanut and other nut butters, dried fruit and nut products, granola and pasta.
All historical segment results reported herein have been reclassified to conform with the September 30, 2018 presentation.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 | | Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change | dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 6,257.2 |
| | $ | 5,225.8 |
| | $ | 1,031.4 |
| | 20 | % | | $ | 5,225.8 |
| | $ | 5,026.8 |
| | $ | 199.0 |
| | 4 | % | Net Sales | $ | 5,698.7 | | | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 17.6 | | | — | % | | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 6,257.2 | | | $ | (576.1) | | | (9) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Profit | $ | 587.5 |
| | $ | 520.3 |
| | $ | 67.2 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 520.3 |
| | $ | 545.7 |
| | $ | (25.4 | ) | | (5 | )% | Operating Profit | $ | 700.5 | | | $ | 781.0 | | | $ | (80.5) | | | (10) | % | | $ | 781.0 | | | $ | 573.5 | | | $ | 207.5 | | | 36 | % |
| Interest expense, net | 387.3 |
| | 314.8 |
| | (72.5 | ) | | (23 | )% | | 314.8 |
| | 306.5 |
| | (8.3 | ) | | (3 | )% | Interest expense, net | 388.6 | | | 322.4 | | | (66.2) | | | (21) | % | | 322.4 | | | 387.3 | | | 64.9 | | | 17 | % |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 31.1 |
| | 222.9 |
| | 191.8 |
| | 86 | % | | 222.9 |
| | 86.4 |
| | (136.5 | ) | | (158 | )% | Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 72.9 | | | 6.1 | | | (66.8) | | | (1,095) | % | | 6.1 | | | 31.1 | | | 25.0 | | | 80 | % |
| (Income) expense on swaps, net | (95.6 | ) | | (91.8 | ) | | 3.8 |
| | 4 | % | | (91.8 | ) | | 182.9 |
| | 274.7 |
| | 150 | % | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (204.0 | ) | | 26.1 |
| | 230.1 |
| | 882 | % | | 26.1 |
| | (26.8 | ) | | (52.9 | ) | | (197 | )% | |
| Expense (income) on swaps, net | | Expense (income) on swaps, net | 187.1 | | | 306.6 | | | 119.5 | | | 39 | % | | 306.6 | | | (95.6) | | | (402.2) | | | (421) | % |
| Other income, net | | Other income, net | (11.5) | | | (13.2) | | | (1.7) | | | (13) | % | | (13.2) | | | (14.0) | | | (0.8) | | | (6) | % |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | Income tax expense (benefit) | 3.5 | | | (3.9) | | | (7.4) | | | (190) | % | | (3.9) | | | (204.0) | | | (200.1) | | | (98) | % |
| Equity method loss, net of tax | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | | n/a |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | n/a |
| Equity method loss, net of tax | 30.9 | | | 37.0 | | | 6.1 | | | 16 | % | | 37.0 | | | 0.3 | | | (36.7) | | | (12,233) | % |
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | (1.1 | ) | | n/a |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | n/a |
| |
| Net Earnings (Loss) | $ | 467.3 |
| | $ | 48.3 |
| | $ | 419.0 |
| | 867 | % | | $ | 48.3 |
| | $ | (3.3 | ) | | $ | 51.6 |
| | 1,564 | % | |
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | | Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28.2 | | | 1.3 | | | (26.9) | | | (2,069) | % | | 1.3 | | | 1.1 | | | (0.2) | | | (18) | % |
| Net Earnings | | Net Earnings | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 124.7 | | | $ | (123.9) | | | (99) | % | | $ | 124.7 | | | $ | 467.3 | | | $ | (342.6) | | | (73) | % |
Net Sales
Fiscal 20182020 compared to 20172019
Net sales increased $1,031.4$17.6 million, or 20%less than 1%, during the year ended September 30, 2018.2020. This increase was primarily due to growth in our BellRing Brands, Post Consumer Brands, Refrigerated Retail and Weetabix segments, as well as the inclusion of incremental contributions from our current year acquisition of Bob Evans andHenningsen. These positive impacts were partially offset by a decline in our prior year acquisition ofFoodservice segment.
All segments were impacted by significant changes in consumer behavior in response to the Weetabix Group, combined with net sales growthCOVID-19 pandemic in all of our segments for the year ended September 30, 2018.2020. For further discussion, refer to “Segment Results” within this section.
Fiscal 20172019 compared to 20162018
Net sales increased $199.0decreased $576.1 million, or 4%9%, during the year ended September 30, 2017. These increases were2019. This decrease was primarily due to the absence of net sales in fiscal 2019 attributable to our historical Private Brands segment ($848.9 million in the year ended
September 30, 2018), which is no longer consolidated in our financial results and is accounted for using the equity method as a result of the 8th Avenue Transactions, partially offset by the inclusion of incremental contributions from fiscal 2017 and 2016 acquisitions and net sales growthfrom our fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans on January 12, 2018. Additionally, net sales grew in our Premier Protein branded products, as well as increased netFoodservice, Post Consumer Brands and BellRing Brands segments for the year ended September 30, 2019. Net sales in our Pebbles and Malt-O-Meal RTE cereal brands, our side dishes business and our traditional and organic peanut butter products. The net sales growth was partially offset by reduced net sales in our other RTE cereal brands, other protein powder and bar brands and egg, cheese, pasta, dried fruit and nut and tree nut butter products.Weetabix segment decreased during the year ended September 30, 2019. For further discussion, refer to “Segment Results” within this section.
Operating Profit
Fiscal 20182020 compared to 20172019
Operating profit increased $67.2decreased $80.5 million, or 13%10%, for the year ended September 30, 2018.2020. In the yearsyear ended September 30, 2018 and 2017,2019, operating profit was impacted by losses related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets of $124.9$63.3 million and $26.5 million, respectively, and provisions for legal settlementby a gain on sale of $17.3 million and $74.5 million, respectively. Additionally, the year ended September 30, 2017 was impacted by net foreign currency gainsbusiness of $30.0$126.6 million related to cash held in Pounds Sterling to fund the fiscal 2017 acquisition of the Weetabix Group.8th Avenue Transactions. Excluding these impacts in both years,the prior year, operating profit increased $138.4decreased $17.2 million, or 23%2%, primarily resulting from the inclusion of incremental segment profit contributions from our current year acquisition of Bob Evans and our prior year acquisition of the Weetabix Group, as well as increaseddue to lower segment profit within our Refrigerated Food, Active NutritionFoodservice and PrivateBellRing Brands segments, for the year ended September 30, 2018, partially offset by a decrease inincreased segment profit within our Post Consumer Brands, segment. GeneralRefrigerated Retail and Weetabix segments, as well as decreased general corporate expenses and other, excluding the previously described foreign currency gains, were higher in the year ended September 30, 2018.other. For further discussion, refer to “Segment Results” within this section.
Fiscal 20172019 compared to 20162018
Operating profit decreased $25.4increased $207.5 million, or 5%36%, for the year ended September 30, 2017. Operating2019. In the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, operating profit was impacted in the year ended September 30, 2017 by losses related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets of $26.5$63.3 million a provisionand $124.9 million, respectively, and provisions for legal settlement of $74.5$2.4 million (compared to $28.5and $17.3 million, respectively. Additionally, in the year ended September 30, 2016) in the Refrigerated Food segment and net foreign currency gains2019, operating profit was impacted by a gain on sale of $30.0business of $126.6 million related to cash held in Pounds Sterling to fund the fiscal 2017 acquisition of the Weetabix Group.8th Avenue Transactions. Excluding these impacts in both years, operating profit increased $17.1 million, or 3%,slightly, primarily resulting fromdue to the
inclusion of incremental segment profit contributionscontribution from our fiscal 2017 and 2016 acquisitions,2018 acquisition of Bob Evans, as well as increased segment profitorganic growth within our BellRing Brands, Foodservice, Weetabix and Post Consumer Brands and Active Nutrition segments for the year ended September 30, 2017, partiallysegments. These positive impacts were offset by a decrease inthe absence of segment profit withinin fiscal 2019 attributable to our Refrigerated Food andhistorical Private Brands segments. In addition, general corporate expenses and other, excluding the previously described foreign currency gains, were highersegment ($60.8 million in the year ended September 30, 2017.2018), which is no longer consolidated in our financial results and is accounted for using the equity method as a result of the 8th Avenue Transactions, and increased general corporate expenses and other in the year ended September 30, 2019. For further discussion, refer to “Segment Results” within this section.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense increased $72.5$66.2 million, or 23%21%, for the year ended September 30, 20182020, compared to the prior year. The increase was driven primarily by increased losses (compared to gains in the prior year period) of $41.0 million on our interest rate swap contracts. Additionally, interest expense increased from the impact of senior notes issued in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019 and debt entered into in connection with the IPO on October 21, 2019, partially offset by reduced interest expense of $56.6 million as a result of the repayment of our term loan in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. Our weighted-average interest rate on our total outstanding debt was 5.3% and 5.2% for the years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. This increase in our weighted-average interest rate was driven by a change in the mix of debt outstanding. During the year ended September 30, 2019, we recorded $5.9 million of interest expense related to amounts owed to former holders of shares of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock under Delaware law. No such interest expense was recorded during the year ended September 30, 2020.
Interest expense decreased $64.9 million, or 17%, for the year ended September 30, 2019, compared to the prior year. The decrease was partially due to increased gains of $28.7 million on our interest rate swap contracts, largely related to the termination of a portion of our interest rate swap contracts that were designated as hedging instruments. Additionally, interest expense was positively impacted by a decrease in the principal balance of debt outstanding fromdue to repayments and repurchases of certain debt issued in fiscal 2019 and 2018 and 2017,lower interest expense of $7.5 million related to amounts owed to former holders of shares of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock under Delaware law. These positive impacts were partially offset by a decreasean increase in our weighted-average interest rate resulting from a change in debt mix. Our weighted-average interest rate on our total outstanding debt was 5.0%5.2% and 5.5%5.0% for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively. We recorded $13.4 million of
For additional information on our interest expense in the year ended September 30, 2018, with respectrate swaps designated as hedging instruments, refer to the amounts owed to former holders of shares of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares under Delaware law and have not withdrawn their demands (see Note 414 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”). No such interest expense was incurred in the year ended September 30, 2017. Additionally, interest expense includes (gains) losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings of $(2.3) million and $0.7 million in the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to our interest rate swaps that are designated as hedging instruments.
Interest expense increased $8.3 million, or 3%, for the year ended September 30, 2017, compared to the prior year. The increase was driven primarily by the increase in the principal balance of debt outstanding from debt issued in fiscal 2017 and 2016, partially offset by a decrease in our weighted-average interest rate resulting from a change in debt mix. Our weighted-average interest rate on our total outstanding debt was 5.5% and 6.8% for the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, interest expense includes losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings of $0.7 million in the years ended September 30, 2017 related to our interest rate swaps that are designated as hedging instruments. There were no losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into interest expense during the year ended September 30, 2016.
Statements.” For additional information on our debt, refer to Note 1617 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Item 7A.7A of this report. For additional information on former holders of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock, refer to Notes 4 and 18 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, net
During the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, we recognized net losses of $31.1$72.9 million, $222.9$6.1 million and $86.4$31.1 million, respectively, related to the extinguishment of debt.
For the year ended September 30, 2020, the losses related to repayments of the outstanding principal balances of our 2020 bridge loan, our term loan, our 5.50% senior notes maturing in March 2025 and our 8.00% senior notes, as well as the amendment and restatement of our credit agreement. The loss included premiums paid of $49.8 million and write-offs of debt issuance costs of $23.1 million.
For the year ended September 30, 2019, the net loss related to the repayment of a portion of our term loan, the assumption of our 2018 bridge loan by 8th Avenue in connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions (the “2018 Bridge Loan”) and the repurchase and retirement of portions of the principal balances of our 5.75% senior notes, 5.625% senior notes and 5.00% senior notes. The net loss included write-offs of debt issuance costs of $10.8 million, partially offset by gains realized on debt repurchased at a discount of $4.0 million and the write-off of an unamortized debt premium of $0.7 million.
For the year ended September 30, 2018, the net loss related to the extinguishmentrepayment of the outstanding principal balance of our 6.00% senior notes, due in December 2022,the repurchase and retirement of portions of the principal balances of our 5.625% senior notes, due in January 2028, 5.75% senior notes, due in March 2027, 5.00% senior notes due in August 2026 and 8.00% senior notes due in July 2025 and the amendment of our term loan. The net loss included premiums and debt extinguishment costs paid of $33.7 million and the write-off of debt issuance costs of $9.7 million, partially offset by the write-off of an unamortized debt premium of $4.6 million and gains realized on debt repurchased at a discount of $7.7 million.
For the year ended September 30, 2017, the loss related to the extinguishment of the entire remaining principal balances of our 6.75% senior notes due in December 2021, 7.375% senior notes due in February 2022 and 7.75% senior notes due in March 2024 and a portion of the principal balance of our 8.00% senior notes due in July 2025. The loss included premiums of $219.8 million and the write-off of debt issuance costs of $18.6 million, partially offset by the write-off of unamortized debt premium of $15.5 million.
For the year ended September 30, 2016, the loss related to the extinguishment of a portion of our 7.375% senior notes due in February 2022 and the remaining balance of our prior term loan. The loss included a tender premium of $88.0 million and the write-off of debt issuance costs of $18.8 million, partially offset by the write-off of net unamortized debt premium and discount of $20.4 million.
For additional information on our debt, refer to Note 1617 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Expense (Income) Expense on Swaps, net
During the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, we recognized net losses (gains) losses of $(95.6)$187.1 million, $(91.8)$306.6 million and $182.9$(95.6) million, respectively, on our interest rate swaps and cross-currency foreign exchange contracts that were not designated as hedging instruments. Of the total net losses recognized in the year ended September 30, 2020, $117.4 million related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments and $69.7 million related to cash settlements paid. Of the total net losses recognized in the year ended September 30, 2019, $293.1 million related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments and $13.5 million related to cash settlements paid. Of the total net gains recognized in the year ended September 30, 2018, $(96.7) million related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments, which was offset by $1.1 million related to cash settlements both of which related to our interest rate swaps. Of the total gains recognized in the year ended September 30, 2017, $(93.6) million related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments on our interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps and foreign exchange forward contracts, which was offset by $1.8 million related to cash settlements on our interest rate swaps. Of the total losses recognized in the year ended
September 30, 2016, $182.4 million related to non-cash mark-to-market adjustments and $0.5 million related to cash settlements, both of which related to our interest rate swaps.paid. For additional information on our interest rate swaps, and cross-currency foreign exchange contracts, refer to Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Item 7A.7A of this report.
Income TaxesTax Expense (Benefit)
Our effective income tax rate for fiscal 20182020 was (77.1)%5.5% compared to 35.1%(2.5)% for fiscal 20172019 and 89.0%(77.1)% for fiscal 2016.2018. A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) expense with amounts computed at the statutory federal rate follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Computed tax (a) | $ | 13.3 | | | $ | 33.4 | | | $ | 64.9 | |
| Enacted tax law and changes, including the Tax Act (a) | (1.5) | | | (4.8) | | | (270.9) | |
| Non-deductible goodwill impairment loss | — | | | 6.9 | | | — | |
| Non-deductible compensation | 4.5 | | | 2.7 | | | 1.2 | |
| Transaction costs | (1.1) | | | 2.2 | | | 1.5 | |
| Domestic production activities deduction | — | | | — | | | (5.9) | |
| State income tax (benefit) expense, net of effect on federal tax | (4.3) | | | (0.7) | | | 5.6 | |
| Non-taxable interest income | — | | | — | | | (2.4) | |
| Valuation allowances | 5.0 | | | 6.6 | | | 4.1 | |
| Change in deferred tax rates | 11.1 | | | (4.6) | | | 0.3 | |
| Uncertain tax positions | 1.2 | | | (7.9) | | | 0.3 | |
| Net losses and basis difference attributable to equity method investment | (6.5) | | | 4.4 | | | — | |
| Income tax credits | (2.6) | | | (3.0) | | | (2.3) | |
| Rate differential on foreign income | (10.8) | | | (7.7) | | | (5.3) | |
| Excess tax benefits for share-based payments | (1.4) | | | (33.4) | | | (1.8) | |
| Gain on bargain purchase | (2.5) | | | — | | | — | |
| Enhanced deduction for food donation | (1.5) | | | (0.6) | | | (0.8) | |
| Return-to-provision | (1.5) | | | 0.6 | | | (1.0) | |
| Other, net (none in excess of 5% of statutory tax) | 2.1 | | | 2.0 | | | 8.5 | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 3.5 | | | $ | (3.9) | | | $ | (204.0) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| (dollars in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Computed tax (a) | $ | 64.9 |
| | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | (10.5 | ) |
| Enacted tax law and changes, including the Tax Act (a) | (270.9 | ) | | — |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Non-deductible goodwill impairment loss | — |
| | 7.2 |
| | — |
|
| Non-deductible compensation | 1.2 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| Non-deductible transaction costs | 1.5 |
| | 2.9 |
| | — |
|
| Domestic production activities deduction | (5.9 | ) | | — |
| | (4.3 | ) |
| State income taxes, net of effect on federal tax | 5.6 |
| | 0.8 |
| | (6.2 | ) |
| Non-taxable interest income | (2.4 | ) | | (3.4 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
| Valuation allowances | 4.1 |
| | 4.8 |
| | 3.8 |
|
| Change in deferred tax rates | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | (2.0 | ) |
| Uncertain tax positions | 0.3 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
| Sale and liquidation of Michael Foods Canadian egg business | — |
| | — |
| | (3.6 | ) |
| Income tax credits | (2.3 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | (1.5 | ) |
| Rate differential on foreign income | (5.3 | ) | | (6.8 | ) | | (1.8 | ) |
| Excess tax benefits for share-based payments | (1.8 | ) | | (6.2 | ) | | — |
|
| Other, net (none in excess of 5% of statutory tax) | 6.7 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (204.0 | ) | | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | (26.8 | ) |
| |
(a) | Fiscal 2018 federal income tax was computed using a blended U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 24.5%. The fiscal 2018 tax rate was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), as discussed below. Fiscal 2017 and 2016 federal income tax was computed at the federal statutory rate of 35%. |
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was enacted and signed into law. Certain provisions of the CARES Act impact our accounting for income taxes, such as modifications to the limitation of business interest expense deductibility for tax years beginning in 2019 and 2020, and have been accounted for within the year ended September 30, 2020. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on our financial statements and disclosures as its impact primarily related to immaterial short-term and long-term classifications on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and current and deferred income tax expense (benefit) classifications in Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
In fiscal 2018, the effective tax rate was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued interpretive guidance regarding the Tax Act, which was codified by Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-05 in March 2018. The Tax Act resulted in significant impacts to our accounting for income taxes with the most significant of these impacts relating to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate, a one-time transition tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings and full expensing of certain qualified depreciable assets placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023. The Tax Act enactsenacted a new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21% that will fully gowent into effect for our fiscal 2019 tax year and iswas prorated with the pre-December 22, 2017 U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 35% for our fiscal 2018 tax year. This proration resulted in a blended U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 24.5% for fiscal 2018. AtDuring the time these financial statements were issued,year ended September 30, 2018, we had not completed the accounting for the tax effects related to the enactment of the Tax Act. However, provisional estimates were made in the following instances: (i) we remeasured our existing deferred tax assets and liabilities considering both the fiscal 2018 blended rate and the 21% rate for future periods and recorded a provisional tax benefit of $281.2 million and (ii) we calculated the one-time transition tax and recorded provisional tax expense of $10.3 million. Full expensing of certain depreciable assets will resultresulted in a temporary differencedifferences, which were analyzed throughout fiscal 2018 as assets arewere placed in service.
The changes included During the year ended September 30, 2019, in connection with preparing our fiscal 2018 corporate income tax returns, we recorded tax benefits related to the Tax Act are broad(i) re-measurement of our existing deferred tax assets and complex,liabilities and as such,(ii) adjustment to the finalone-time transition impactstax of the Tax Act may differ from the above estimates, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in current accounting standards for$0.2 and $4.6, respectively. No income taxes ortax adjustments were made related interpretations in response to the Tax Act or any updates or changes to estimates we have utilized to calculateduring the transition impacts, including impacts resulting from changes to fiscal 2018 earnings estimates and foreign exchange rates. ASU 2018-05 allows for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of theended September 30, 2020. The Tax Act subjects U.S. corporations to finalizea tax on global low-taxed income, which we elected to recognize in the recordingperiod in which it is incurred.
SEGMENT RESULTS
We evaluate each segment’s performance based on its segment profit, which is its operating profitearnings before income taxes and equity method earnings/loss before impairment of property, goodwill and other intangible assets, facility closure related costs, restructuring expenses, (gains)/lossesgain/loss on assets and liabilities held for sale, (gains)/lossesgain/loss on salesales of plantbusinesses and facilities, gain on bargain purchase, interest expense and other unallocated corporate income and expenses.
Post Consumer Brands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 | | | | |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 1,949.1 | | | $ | 1,875.9 | | | $ | 73.2 | | | 4 | % | | $ | 1,875.9 | | | $ | 1,831.7 | | | $ | 44.2 | | | 2 | % | | | | |
| Segment Profit | $ | 393.5 | | | $ | 337.1 | | | $ | 56.4 | | | 17 | % | | $ | 337.1 | | | $ | 329.2 | | | $ | 7.9 | | | 2 | % | | |
| Segment Profit Margin | 20 | % | | 18 | % | | | | | | 18 | % | | 18 | % | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 1,831.7 |
| | $ | 1,742.5 |
| | $ | 89.2 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 1,742.5 |
| | $ | 1,728.2 |
| | $ | 14.3 |
| | 1 | % |
| Segment Profit | $ | 329.2 |
| | $ | 354.9 |
| | $ | (25.7 | ) | | (7 | )% | | $ | 354.9 |
| | $ | 290.4 |
| | $ | 64.5 |
| | 22 | % |
| Segment Profit Margin | 18 | % | | 20 | % | | | | | | 20 | % | | 17 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 20182020 compared to 20172019
Net sales for the Post Consumer Brands segment increased $89.2$73.2 million, or 4%, for the year ended September 30, 2020, primarily driven by 3% higher volume. This increase in volume was largely due to an increase in consumer purchases in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the product level, volume gains were primarily driven by gains in private label cereal, Pebbles, Malt-O-Meal bag cereal, Honey Bunches of Oats and adult and kid classic brands, partially offset by volume declines in natural and organic cereal, licensed products and government bid business. Average net selling prices increased when compared to the prior year period resulting from targeted price increases and a lower promotional trade rate.
Segment profit for the year ended September 30, 2020 increased $56.4 million, or 17%, compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher net sales, as previously discussed, lower manufacturing costs of $26.6 million (driven by manufacturing cost efficiencies and favorable fixed cost leverage on increased volumes, partially offset by increased COVID-19 related expenses), reduced freight costs of $13.1 million and decreased integration expenses of $6.6 million. These positive impacts were partially offset by increased employee-related expenses, higher product donations of $4.4 million, increased advertising and consumer spending of $3.5 million and higher warehousing costs of $2.6 million.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
Net sales for the Post Consumer Brands segment increased $44.2 million, or 2%, for the year ended September 30, 2019, primarily driven by higher average net selling prices resulting from targeted price increases and 1% higher volumes, partially offset by an unfavorable product mix. Volume increases were primarily due to increases in private label cereal, kid classic brands, Pebbles and licensed products. These increases were partially offset by declines in Malt-O-Meal bag cereal, Great Grains, Honey Bunches of Oats and adult classic brands.
Segment profit for the year ended September 30, 2019 increased $7.9 million, or 2%, compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher average net selling prices and increased volumes, as previously discussed, as well as lower advertising and consumer spending of $8.5 million and decreased integration costs of $1.2 million. These positive impacts were partially offset by higher raw material costs of $13.8 million, increased freight costs of $11.8 million (excluding volume-driven impacts), unfavorable manufacturing costs of $5.3 million, higher warehousing expense of $4.2 million and increased employee-related expenses.
Weetabix
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 440.4 | | | $ | 418.2 | | | $ | 22.2 | | | 5 | % | | $ | 418.2 | | | $ | 423.4 | | | $ | (5.2) | | | (1) | % |
| Segment Profit | $ | 112.3 | | | $ | 94.8 | | | $ | 17.5 | | | 18 | % | | $ | 94.8 | | | $ | 87.2 | | | $ | 7.6 | | | 9 | % |
| Segment Profit Margin | 25 | % | | 23 | % | | | | | | 23 | % | | 21 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019
Net sales for the Weetabix segment increased $22.2 million, or 5%, for the year ended September 30, 2020, due to improved average net selling prices and 2% higher volume. Average net selling prices increased primarily due to targeted price increases, reduced trade spending and a favorable product mix. Volume increases were largely due to an increase in consumer purchases in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily driven by gains in at-home consumption of biscuit cereal products,
partially offset by declines in consumption of Weetabix On The Go drinks and bars, as well as reduced extruded product volume due to the start-up of a new manufacturing line at our Corby, United Kingdom manufacturing facility in fiscal 2020.
Segment profit increased $17.5 million, or 18%, for the year ended September 30, 2020. This increase was driven by higher net sales, as previously discussed, and favorable manufacturing and raw materials costs of $7.4 million, partially offset by higher advertising and consumer spending of $5.9 million and increased employee-related expenses.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
Net sales for the Weetabix segment decreased $5.2 million, or 1%, for the year ended September 30, 2019, primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates. Excluding this impact, net sales increased approximately 4%, driven by improved average net selling prices, partially offset by lower volume. Volume was down 5%, driven by declines in non-biscuit branded RTE cereal products, WeetabixOn The Go drink products, exports and bars, partially offset by increases in private label products. Average net selling prices increased primarily due to targeted price increases and reduced promotional activity.
Segment profit increased $7.6 million, or 9%, for the year ended September 30, 2019. This increase was driven by improved average net selling prices, as previously discussed, partially offset by lower volumes, as previously discussed, increased advertising and consumer spending of $7.0 million, higher employee-related expenses, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and unfavorable raw material and manufacturing costs of $4.6 million. Segment profit was negatively impacted in fiscal 2018 by integration expenses of $2.3 million.
Foodservice
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 1,361.8 | | | $ | 1,627.4 | | | $ | (265.6) | | | (16) | % | | $ | 1,627.4 | | | $ | 1,548.2 | | | $ | 79.2 | | | 5 | % |
| Segment Profit | $ | 25.6 | | | $ | 198.4 | | | $ | (172.8) | | | (87) | % | | $ | 198.4 | | | $ | 157.6 | | | $ | 40.8 | | | 26 | % |
| Segment Profit Margin | 2 | % | | 12 | % | | | | | | 12 | % | | 10 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019
Net sales for the Foodservice segment decreased $265.6 million, or 16%, for the year ended September 30, 2020. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2020 were positively impacted by the inclusion of incremental net sales attributable to our current year acquisition of Henningsen. Excluding net sales attributable to Henningsen, net sales decreased $277.9 million, or 17%, driven by 17% lower volume. The volume decline was due to lower foodservice product demand as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Egg product sales were down $245.5 million, or 23%, with volume down 22%, driven by 21% lower volume in the foodservice channel and lower average net selling prices in the food ingredient channel, partially offset by 4% higher volume in the food ingredient channel. Food ingredient average net selling prices decreased primarily due to lower market-based raw and liquid egg prices and short-term price reductions used to move excess inventory created by lower product demand as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sales of side dishes were down $24.0 million, or 14%, with volume down 18%. Sausage sales were down $4.0 million, or 21%, with volume down 19%. Other product sales were down $4.4 million, or 20%, with volume down 20%.
Segment profit decreased $172.8 million, or 87%, for the year ended September 30, 2020, primarily due to lower foodservice volumes, as previously discussed, increased net product costs and other negative impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lower volume and short-term price reductions, as previously discussed, unfavorable fixed cost absorption as we reduced our egg supply and production in our plants to match lower demand and increased inventory write-offs of $12.3 million, mainly due to increased expense for donated and obsolete inventory on short-dated products, due to the decline in foodservice product demand, as well as increased expenses attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased employee wages and paid absences, COVID-19 screening expenses and additional sanitizing costs. Additionally, net product costs were negatively impacted by (i) start-up costs of $14.2 million related to our new precooked egg facility in Norwalk, Iowa, (ii) manufacturing inefficiencies at certain facilities, (iii) higher freight costs of $5.7 million despite lower volumes, due to load factor and other inefficiencies in our transportation network, (iv) increased losses related to commodity and energy hedges of $8.2 million, (v) a $2.5 million insurance deductible and $0.4 million of repair and clean-up expenses due to a fire at our Bloomfield, Nebraska laying facility in the second quarter of fiscal 2020 and (vi) $4.7 million of insurance proceeds received in fiscal 2019 in connection with a fire that occurred at our Klingerstown, Pennsylvania facility in the third quarter of fiscal 2018.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
Net sales for the Foodservice segment increased $79.2 million, or 5%, for the year ended September 30, 2019, partially due to the inclusion of incremental net sales attributable to our fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans. Excluding net sales attributable to Bob Evans in both years, net sales increased $59.7 million, or 4%, primarily due to increased volume and improved average net selling prices resulting from a favorable product mix. Egg product sales were up $50.9 million, or 4%, with volume up 4%. Volume increases were attributable to gains in the foodservice and food ingredient channels. Sales of side dishes were up $9.4 million, or 8%, with volume up 7%. Other product sales were down $0.4 million, or 6%, with volume down 12%.
Segment profit increased $40.8 million, or 26%, for the year ended September 30, 2019. Segment profit included profit of $3.2 million and $0.9 million in the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, attributable to our fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans. Excluding these amounts, segment profit increased $38.5 million, or 25%, primarily due to volume growth and improved margins on a favorable product and customer mix with a continued shift to higher value-added products. These favorable impacts were partially offset by increased warehousing costs of $7.9 million, unfavorable manufacturing costs of $5.0 million, higher freight costs of $3.3 million (excluding volume-driven impacts) and increased employee-related expenses. Additionally, segment profit was impacted by provisions for legal settlement of $1.6 million and $8.3 million in the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Refrigerated Retail
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 | | | | |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 961.2 | | | $ | 907.3 | | | $ | 53.9 | | | 6 | % | | $ | 907.3 | | | $ | 790.9 | | | $ | 116.4 | | | 15 | % | | | | |
| Segment Profit | $ | 125.6 | | | $ | 95.1 | | | $ | 30.5 | | | 32 | % | | $ | 95.1 | | | $ | 90.0 | | | $ | 5.1 | | | 6 | % | | |
| Segment Profit Margin | 13 | % | | 10 | % | | | | | | 10 | % | | 11 | % | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019
Net sales for the Refrigerated Retail segment increased $53.9 million, or 6%, for the year ended September 30, 2020. Sales of side dishes increased $41.1 million, or 12%, driven by increased average net selling prices and 3% higher volume. The increase in average net selling prices was primarily due to targeted price increases, a favorable product mix and lower trade spending. Volume increases were driven by higher branded dinner sides volume, partially offset by lower deli sides and private label dinner sides volume. Sausage sales increased $22.4 million, or 17%, driven by 12% higher volume and higher average net selling prices as a result of reduced trade spending. Cheese and other dairy case product sales were up $20.7 million, or 9%, with volume up 1%, primarily due to higher average net selling prices as a result of targeted price increases and lower trade spending. Branded dinner sides, sausage and cheese and other dairy case products volumes were positively impacted by an increase in consumer purchases in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Egg product sales were down $30.3 million, or 18%, with volume down 16%, due to declines in deli products resulting from deli closures as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decision to exit certain low-margin business, as well as losses in branded liquid egg product volume. Sales of other products were flat with volume down 11%.
Segment profit increased $30.5 million, or 32%, for the year ended September 30, 2020, primarily due to higher net sales, as previously discussed, and lower raw material costs of $6.7 million (primarily due to lower sow costs, partially offset by higher cheese input costs), partially offset by increased employee-related expenses, higher manufacturing costs of $9.5 million and higher freight costs of $3.4 million.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
Net sales for the Refrigerated Retail segment increased $116.4 million, or 15%, for the year ended September 30, 2019, with volume increasing 19%. Volume and net sales were impacted in fiscal 2019 and 2018 by the inclusion of results from our fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans. When compared to fiscal 2018 (partially pre-acquisition), overall volumes for the segment increased 2%. This increase was due to higher volumes of 8% in side dishes and 1% in egg products, partially offset by lower volumes of 5% in cheese and other dairy case products and 4% in sausage. Excluding the impact of the acquisition, volume for our legacy refrigerated retail businesses decreased 1%. Compared to fiscal 2018 (partially pre-acquisition), Bob Evans total retail volume increased 6%, driven by an 11% increase in side dish volumes.
Segment profit increased $5.1 million, or 6%, for the year ended September 30, 2019, primarily due to the inclusion of an additional ninethree months of results from our fiscal 2018 acquisition of the Weetabix NA businessBob Evans and lower integration costs of $7.0 million, partially offset by decreased volumes in our legacy refrigerated retail businesses, as previously discussed, unfavorable manufacturing cost performance and higher freight costs. During the year ended September 30, 2018, assegment profit was
negatively impacted by the recognition of an acquisition accounting-related inventory valuation adjustment of $4.1 million and acquisition-related costs of $2.4 million.
BellRing Brands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 | | | | |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 988.3 | | | $ | 854.4 | | | $ | 133.9 | | | 16 | % | | $ | 854.4 | | | $ | 827.5 | | | $ | 26.9 | | | 3 | % | | | | |
| Segment Profit | $ | 164.0 | | | $ | 175.1 | | | $ | (11.1) | | | (6) | % | | $ | 175.1 | | | $ | 124.4 | | | $ | 50.7 | | | 41 | % | | |
| Segment Profit Margin | 17 | % | | 20 | % | | | | | | 20 | % | | 15 | % | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019
Net sales for the BellRing Brands segment increased $133.9 million, or 16%, for the year ended September 30, 2020. Sales of Premier Protein products were up $148.2 million, or 22%, with volume up 23%. Volume increases were driven by higher RTD protein shake product volumes which primarily related to distribution gains, lapping short-term capacity constraints in the prior year period. Excluding this impact, net sales increased 1% on 1% higher volumes. Volume increases were primarily due to gains in licensed products, driven by new product introductions and expanded distribution, as well as increases in Honey Bunches of Oats and governmental bid business. These increases were partially offset by decreases in Malt-O-Meal bags and kid and adult classic brands. Average net selling prices decreased primarily due to higher trade spending, which included increased slotting fees related to new product introductions, partially offset by a favorable product mix.lower other RTD beverage volumes. Sales of Dymatize products were down $4.0 million, or 4%, with volume down 1%. Volumes decreased primarily due to lower international and specialty channel volumes, largely resulting from consumer reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by higher eCommerce volumes. Sales of PowerBar products were down $9.1 million, or 20%, with volume down 29%, driven by strategic sales reductions of low performing products within our North American portfolio and lower international channel volumes resulting from consumer reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic. Sales of all other products were down $1.2 million.
Segment profit decreased $11.1 million, or 6%, for the year ended September 30, 2017 decreased $25.7 million, or 7%, compared to the prior year. The2020. This decrease in segment profit was primarily due to unfavorable manufacturingdriven by higher net product costs of $20.1$17.4 million in part due to higher than expected conversion(driven by unfavorable raw materials costs, associated with new product introductions, which are expected to improve in future periods,partially offset by lower freight and manufacturing costs), increased co-manufacturing costs also associated with new product introductionsadvertising and unplanned downtime at twoconsumer spending of our facilities, which is not expected to be recurring. Segment profit was also negatively impacted by higher raw material$13.1 million, incremental public company costs of $8.9$8.4 million, higher employee-related expenses (including stock-based compensation expense of $6.5 million), higher warehousing costs of $3.7 million and higher freightincreased IPO-related transaction costs of $17.0 million (excluding volume-driven increases).$1.5 million. These negative impacts were partially offset by higher net sales, as previously discussed, lower advertising and consumer spending of $8.7 million and lower employee-related costs.discussed.
Fiscal 20172019 compared to 20162018
Net sales for the Post ConsumerBellRing Brands segment increased $14.3$26.9 million, or 1%3%, for the year ended September 30, 2017, primarily due to the inclusion2019. Sales of Weetabix NA, which was acquired in July 2017, in the Post Consumer Brands segment. Excluding this impact, net sales decreased $13.8Premier Protein products were up $43.8 million, or 1%. This decrease was primarilyof 7%, with volume up 5%, driven by 1% lower volumes. Volume declines were primarily due to reductions in government bid business,co-manufacturing, Honey Bunches of Oats and adult and kid classic brands, partially offset by increases in licensed products and Malt-O-Meal branded products. Averagehigher average net selling prices increased driven by a favorable sales mix as brandedvolumes increasedresulting from targeted price increases and lower margin co-manufacturing and governmental bid business volumes decreased,partially offset by higher trade spending.
Segment profit for the year ended September 30, 2017 increased $64.5 million, or 22%, compared to the prior year. The year ended September 30, 2017 included an operating loss of $6.4 million attributable to Weetabix NA. Excluding this impact, segment profit increased $70.9 million, or 24%, when compared to the prior year period. The increase in segment profit was primarily due to a 427 basis point improvement in segment profit margin, excluding Weetabix NA. This improvement was driven by reduced advertising and promotional spending of $30.2 million, lower material, manufacturing and freight costs of $26.8 million and $11.8 million lower integration costs in the year ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the prior year.
Weetabix
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 423.4 |
| | $ | 112.4 |
| | $ | 311.0 |
| | 277 | % |
| Segment Profit | $ | 87.2 |
| | $ | 14.5 |
| | $ | 72.7 |
| | 501 | % |
| Segment Profit Margin | 21 | % | | 13 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017
Net sales for the Weetabix segment increased $311.0 million, or 277%, for the year September 30, 2018. This increase is due to the inclusion of an additional nine months of results in the year ended September 30, 2018, as compared to the prior year period. Volumes declined as compared to the same period (partially pre-acquisition) in the prior year, driven by decreased branded RTE cereal and Weetabix On The Go drinkRTD protein shake product volumes, partially offset by increased private label RTE cereal volumes. Netlower sales benefited from higher average net selling pricesof nutrition bars. Sales of Dymatize products were up $4.3 million, or 4%, with volume up 3%, primarily due to distribution gains in the mass channel and a favorable foreign exchange translation rate compared toorganic growth in the prior year period. The increase in average net selling prices was driven by reduced trade spending,eCommerce channel, partially offset by an unfavorable product mix.declines in the domestic specialty channel. Sales of PowerBar products were down $15.6 million, or 26%, with volume down 29%, driven by distribution losses and strategic sales reductions of low performing products within the North American portfolio. Sales of all other products were down $5.6 million.
Segment profit increased $72.7$50.7 million, or 501%41%, for the year ended September 30, 2018. This increase was due to the inclusion of an additional nine months of results in the year ended September 30, 2018, as compared to the prior year period. Segment profit was positively impacted in the current year by increased average net selling prices, as previously discussed, as well as reduced advertising and consumer spending. These positive impacts were partially offset by decreased volumes and an unfavorable product mix, as previously discussed, inventory write-offs and higher depreciation and amortization expense resulting from acquisition-related valuation adjustments. Segment profit was negatively impacted in the prior year by an acquisition accounting related inventory valuation adjustment of $15.2 million, increased warehousing costs and start-up costs for a new sales office.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
For the year ended September 30, 2017, the Weetabix segment contributed $112.4 million of net sales and $14.5 million of segment profit. Weetabix experienced strong volume growth in its branded business compared to the same period (pre-acquisition) in the prior year, driven by higher volumes of branded RTE cereal and Weetabix On The Go drink products. Private label volumes were flat as compared to the same period (pre-acquisition) in the prior year. Segment profit was positively impacted in fiscal 2017 by increased volumes, as previously discussed, and negatively impacted by an acquisition accounting related inventory valuation adjustment of $15.2 million, increased warehousing costs and start-up costs for a new sales office.
Refrigerated Food
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 2,337.9 |
| | $ | 1,870.8 |
| | $ | 467.1 |
| | 25 | % | | $ | 1,870.8 |
| | $ | 1,917.4 |
| | $ | (46.6 | ) | | (2 | )% |
| Segment Profit | $ | 247.6 |
| | $ | 110.6 |
| | $ | 137.0 |
| | 124 | % | | $ | 110.6 |
| | $ | 245.7 |
| | $ | (135.1 | ) | | (55 | )% |
| Segment Profit Margin | 11 | % | | 6 | % | | | | | | 6 | % | | 13 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017
Net sales for the Refrigerated Food segment increased $467.1 million, or 25%, for the year ended September 30, 2018, primarily due to the inclusion of net sales from Bob Evans which was acquired in January 2018. Excluding this impact net sales increased $134.0 million, or 7%. Egg product sales were up $122.8 million, or 9%, with volume up 4%, due to increased volumes in the foodservice channel combined with higher average net selling prices resulting from higher market-based egg prices and improved product mix. Sales of side dishes were up $16.0 million, or 8%, with volume up 8%, due to volume gains in both the foodservice and retail channels. Cheese and other dairy case products sales were down $10.8 million, or 4%, with volume down 5%, primarily due to branded cheese distribution losses. Compared to the prior year (pre-acquisition) period, sales for our Bob Evans business were up, driven by increased refrigerated side dishes and sausage volumes, as well as the inclusion of incremental contribution from a prior year acquisition.
Segment profit increased $137.0 million, or 124%, for the year ended September 30, 2018. Segment profit was impacted in the current year period by the inclusion of operating profit of $14.5 million attributable to Bob Evans. Additionally, segment profit was impacted by provisions for legal settlement of $8.3 million and $74.5 million in the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively (for additional information, refer to “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 and Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”). Excluding these impacts, segment profit increased $56.3 million, or 30%, primarily due to increased volumes and higher average net selling prices, as previously discussed, partially offset by increased raw material and manufacturing costs, higher freight costs of $18.1 million (excluding volume-driven increases), increased employee-related expenses and higher integration costs of $4.8 million. Additionally, segment profit was negatively impacted by repair and clean-up expenses, lost revenue and corresponding lost margin related to modest service level issues resulting from a fire and municipal water boil order at two precooked egg facilities. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the total negative impact on segment profit for these items was $7.0 million. Segment profit for our Bob Evans business was negatively impacted in the year ended September 30, 2018 by integration costs of $7.9 million, an acquisition accounting-related inventory valuation adjustment of
$4.8 million and acquisition-related costs of $2.4 million. Excluding these impacts, Bob Evans contributed $29.6 million to segment profit for the year ended September 30, 2018.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
Net sales for the Refrigerated Food segment decreased $46.6 million, or 2%, for the year ended September 30, 2017. Egg product sales, including the impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisition of NPE, were up 1%, with volume up 10%. Volumes increased due to incremental volume from NPE, as well as the impact of egg supply returning to levels consistent with those prior to the outbreak of avian influenza (“AI”) in 2015. Egg revenues increased due to incremental sales from NPE, offset by lower selling prices resulting from the reversal of price increases taken in the prior year to offset higher costs incurred as a result of AI and lower market-based egg prices. Sales of side dishes were up 7%, with volume up 8%, primarily due to volume gains in the foodservice channel. Cheese and other dairy case products sales were down 21% on 21% lower volumes, primarily due to branded cheese distribution losses and losses within the low-margin private label cheese business. Net sales for the Refrigerated Food segment were also impacted in the year ended September 30, 2017 by the absence of sales from our Michael Foods Canadian egg business ($9.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2016), which was sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2016.
Segment profit decreased $135.1 million, or 55%, for the year ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in segment profit was primarily due to a provision for legal settlements of $74.5 million in the year ended September 30, 2017, compared to $28.5 million in the year ended September 30, 2016 (for additional information, refer to “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 and Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”). In addition, egg results decreased compared to fiscal 2016 due to lower net selling prices, as previously discussed. Cheese and dairy results decreased $9.5 million as a result of lost volume, as previously discussed. These decreases were partially offset by favorable side dishes results compared to the prior year.
Active Nutrition
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 827.5 |
| | $ | 713.2 |
| | $ | 114.3 |
| | 16 | % | | $ | 713.2 |
| | $ | 574.7 |
| | $ | 138.5 |
| | 24 | % |
| Segment Profit | $ | 124.4 |
| | $ | 96.4 |
| | $ | 28.0 |
| | 29 | % | | $ | 96.4 |
| | $ | 44.7 |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| | 116 | % |
| Segment Profit Margin | 15 | % | | 14 | % | | | | | | 14 | % | | 8 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017
Net sales for the Active Nutrition segment increased $114.3 million, or 16%, for the year ended September 30, 2018, primarily attributable to protein shake and other ready-to-drink (“RTD”) product volumes, which were up 26%, driven by increased consumption and distribution of shakes, as well as new product introductions. Volumes were down 10% for powders, primarily due to weakness in the domestic specialty and club channels, partially offset by distribution gains in the mass, grocery and e-commerce channels. Volumes were down 22% for bars, primarily due to lost distribution in North America.
Segment profit increased $28.0 million, or 29%, for the year ended September 30, 2018.2019. Segment profit in the year ended September 30, 2018 was impacted by a litigation settlement accrual of $9.0 million. Excluding this impact, segment profit increased $37.0$41.7 million, or 38%31%. This increase was primarily driven by higher volumes,net sales, as previously discussed, lower net product costs of $19.6 million, as favorable raw materials and lowerfreight costs were partially offset by increased manufacturing costs, and reduced advertising and consumer spending of $9.7 million, partially offset by higher raw material costs of $2.3 million, increased freight costs of $8.4 million (excluding volume-driven increases) and increased employee-related expenses to support growth.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
Net sales for the Active Nutrition segment increased $138.5 million, or 24%, for the year ended September 30, 2017, primarily attributable to protein shake and other RTD volumes, which were up 51%, fueled by increased consumption and distribution of protein shakes, as well as new product introductions. Volumes were down 6% for bars and down 1% for powders. Average net selling prices for the Active Nutrition segment were down primarily due to price reductions and higher trade spending in the year ended September 30, 2017.
Segment profit increased $51.7 million, or 116%, for the year ended September 30, 2017. This increase was driven by higher volumes, as previously described, and favorable input costs of $24.9 million, partially offset by $6.4 million higher advertising and consumer spending and increased employee-related expenses resulting from increased headcount to support growth.
Private Brands
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net Sales | $ | 848.9 |
| | $ | 791.2 |
| | $ | 57.7 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 791.2 |
| | $ | 811.1 |
| | $ | (19.9 | ) | | (2 | )% |
| Segment Profit | $ | 60.8 |
| | $ | 58.1 |
| | $ | 2.7 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 58.1 |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | (13.3 | ) | | (19 | )% |
| Segment Profit Margin | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | | | | | 7 | % | | 9 | % | | | | |
Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017
Net sales for the Private Brands segment increased $57.7 million, or 7%, for the year ended September 30, 2018. Nut butter sales increased 4%, with volume up 1%, combined with a favorable sales mix due to increases in higher-priced organic peanut butter and tree nut butter volumes. Dried fruit and nut sales increased 36%, with volume up 21%, primarily due to gains in the retail sales channel, combined with increased average net selling prices as higher raw material costs were passed through to customers. Cereal and granola sales decreased 6%, with volumes remaining flat, due to an unfavorable sales mix and reduced average net selling prices. Average net selling prices declined due to increased low-margin sales to the Post Consumer Brands segment as the private brands cereal business was fully transitioned to Post Consumer Brands during fiscal 2018, as well as a change in customer mix. Pasta sales increased 4%, with volume up 1%, primarily due to increased foodservice, co-manufacturing and governmental bid business volumes, combined with increased average net selling prices as higher raw material costs were passed through to customers.
Segment profit increased $2.7 million, or 5%, for the year ended September 30, 2018, primarily due to higher volumes, a favorable sales mix and improved net selling prices, as previously discussed, as well as improved gross margins resulting from the decision to exit certain low-margin business.$5.4 million. These positive impacts were partially offset by higher raw materialincreased brokerage and warehousing costs (largely durum wheat and traditional peanuts), increased freight costsof $2.2 million and higher employee costs related to increased headcount to support the reorganized segment. Segment profit for the year ended September 30, 2017 was negatively impacted by an inventory write-off related to a small oven fire, which occurred in May 2017.employee-related expenses.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
Net sales for the Private Brands segment decreased $19.9 million, or 2%, for the year ended September 30, 2017. Pasta sales decreased 8%, with volume down 4%, primarily due to lower ingredient and government bid business volumes combined with increased average net selling prices as higher raw material costs were passed through to customers. Dried fruit and nut sales decreased 5%, with volume down 11%, driven by the decision to exit certain low-revenue business. Cereal and granola sales decreased 2%, on 1% lower volumes. These decreases were partially offset by increased nut butter sales, which increased 3%, with volume up 1%. Volume increases were primarily due to increases in tree nut butter and traditional and organic peanut butter, partially offset by decreases in roasting and granulation.
Segment profit decreased $13.3 million, or 19%, for the year ended September 30, 2017, primarily resulting from unfavorable manufacturing costs and lost revenue due to delays in adding additional granola capacity, as well as lower net sales, as previously discussed. These negative impacts were partially offset by lower raw materials costs in the year ended September 30, 2017. Segment profit was negatively impacted in the year ended September 30, 2016 by lossesTable of $0.6 million on the disposal of fixed assets.ContentsOther Items
General Corporate Expenses and Other
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 | | |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | | | |
| General corporate expenses and other | $ | 109.0 | | | $ | 169.6 | | | $ | 60.6 | | | 36 | % | | $ | 169.6 | | | $ | 136.8 | | | $ | (32.8) | | | (24) | % | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| General corporate expenses and other | $ | 136.8 |
| | $ | 87.7 |
| | $ | (49.1 | ) | | (56 | )% | | $ | 87.7 |
| | $ | 106.5 |
| | $ | 18.8 |
| | 18 | % |
Fiscal 20182020 compared to 20172019
General corporate expenses and other decreased $60.6 million, or 36%, during the year ended September 30, 2020, primarily driven by decreased third party transaction costs of $20.7 million, lower restructuring and facility closure costs of $18.2 million (including lower accelerated depreciation of $12.3 million), increased gains (compared to losses in the prior year) related to mark-to-market adjustments on deferred compensation of $4.7 million and decreased losses on commodity and foreign currency hedges of $2.6 million. Additionally, general corporate expenses and other for the year ended September 30, 2020 were positively impacted by a gain on bargain purchase of $11.7 million related to the current year acquisition of Henningsen. These positive impacts were partially offset by higher stock-based compensation of $3.5 million and increased losses on assets held for sale (compared to gains in the prior year) of $3.3 million. General corporate expenses and other for the year ended September 30, 2019 were negatively impacted by costs of $1.3 million related to obtaining consents from holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 5.00% senior notes.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
General corporate expenses and other increased $49.1$32.8 million, or 56%24%, during the year ended September 30, 2018,2019, primarily duedriven by increased losses (compared to gains in the prior year netyear) related to mark-to-market adjustments on commodity and foreign currency gainshedges of $30.0$13.0 million, related to cash held in Pounds Sterling to fund theincreased restructuring and facility closure costs of $12.7 million (including increased accelerated depreciation of $8.3 million), higher stock compensation of $6.0 million, higher third party transaction costs of $1.4 million and increased employee-related expenses. Additionally, fiscal 2017 purchase of the Weetabix Group. Excluding this impact,2019 general corporate expenses and other increased $19.1were negatively impacted by costs of $1.3 million or 16%. The increase was primarily related to integrationobtaining consents from holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 5.00% senior notes. These negative impacts were partially offset by master services agreement and advisory income resulting from the 8th Avenue Transactions of $3.4 million recorded during the year ended September 30, 2019. Fiscal 2018 general corporate expenses and other were impacted by costs related to the integration planning for the acquisition of Bob Evans of $6.1 million, increased
restructuring and plant closure costs of $7.6 million (including accelerated depreciation of $3.9 million), higher stock-based compensation costs of $3.3 million and higher employee-related expenses to support growth. These negative impacts were partially offset by lower third party transaction costs of $6.6 million.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
General corporate expenses and other decreased $18.8 million, or 18%, duringFor additional information on the year ended September 30, 2017, primarily due to net foreign currency gainsconsents from holders of $30.0 million related to cash held in Pounds Sterling to fund the fiscal 2017 purchasea majority of the Weetabix Group, lower restructuring and plant closure costsaggregate principal amount of $6.5 million (including accelerated depreciation of $0.4 million) and lower outside professional services costs of $2.4 million. In addition, a gain on assets held for sale of $0.2 million was recorded in the year ended September 30, 2017our outstanding 5.00% senior notes, see Note 17 within “Notes to adjust the carrying value of the assets to reflect the final sales price compared to losses on assets held for sale of $9.3 million in the prior year. These decreases were partially offset by increased third party acquisition and divestiture related costs of $22.0 million, primarily related to success fees expensed in conjunction with the Weetabix Group acquisition, higher stock-based compensation of $6.5 million and decreased gains related to mark-to-market adjustments on commodity hedges of $0.5 million.Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Restructuring and PlantFacility Closure
The table below shows the amount of restructuring and plantfacility closure costs, including accelerated depreciation, attributable to each segment. These amounts are excluded from the measure of segment profit but are included in general corporate expenses and other. For additional information on restructuring costs, refer to Note 5 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | 13.4 | | | $ | 11.4 | | | | | $ | 13.4 | | | $ | 6.4 | | | $ | (7.0) | |
| Weetabix | 0.3 | | | 7.1 | | | 6.8 | | | | | 7.1 | | | 1.4 | | | (5.7) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $ | 2.3 | | | $ | 20.5 | | | $ | 18.2 | | | | | $ | 20.5 | | | $ | 7.8 | | | $ | (12.7) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 6.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (6.4 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
|
| Weetabix | 1.4 |
| | — |
| | (1.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Active Nutrition | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 4.8 |
|
| | $ | 7.8 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | (7.6 | ) | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 6.7 |
| | $ | 6.5 |
|
(Gain)/LossGain on Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
The table below shows the amount of net losses (gains) losses on assets and liabilities held for sale attributable to each segment. These amounts are excluded from the measure of segment profit but are included in general corporate expenses and other. In the year ended September 30, 2020, adjustments to the fair values of the Clinton, Massachusetts manufacturing facility and certain assets at our Asheboro, North Carolina manufacturing facility, which are both reported in the Post Consumer Brands segment, were recognized as a result of third party data. In the year ended September 30, 2020, the book value of certain assets at our Corby, United Kingdom manufacturing facility, which is reported in our Weetabix segment, were lower than fair value; therefore, no fair value adjustment was recorded at the time the assets were classified as held for sale. In the year ended September 30, 2019, final adjustments to the fair value a portion of the Clinton, Massachusetts manufacturing facility were recognized upon the partial sale of the facility. In the year ended September 30, 2018, the book values of the assets and liabilities for 8th Avenue, historically reported herein as theour Private Brands segment, and the Clinton, Massachusetts manufacturing facility, reported in theour Post Consumer Brands segment, were both lower than the estimated fair value,value; therefore, no fair value adjustment was recorded at the time the assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale. Any final adjustments to the fair values of 8th Avenue and the Clinton, Massachusetts manufacturing facility will be recognized upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions and the sale of the facility, respectively. For additional information on our assets and liabilities held for sale, refer to Note 6 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | favorable/(unfavorable) |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4.8 |
| | $ | 4.8 |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 2.7 | | | $ | (0.6) | | | $ | (3.3) | | | $ | (0.6) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.6 | |
| Active Nutrition | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | 4.5 |
| | 4.7 |
| |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 9.3 |
| | $ | 9.5 |
| |
|
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 | | Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018 | | |
| | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | | | favorable/(unfavorable) | | | | | | |
| dollars in millions | 2020 | | 2019 | | $ Change | | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | | | | | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | $ | — | | | $ | 63.3 | | | $ | 63.3 | | | | | $ | 63.3 | | | $ | 124.9 | | | $ | 61.6 | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2018 compared to 2017 | | Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016 |
| dollars in millions | 2018 | | 2017 | | $ Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | $ | 124.9 |
| | $ | 26.5 |
| | $ | (98.4 | ) | | $ | 26.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (26.5 | ) |
During the year ended September 30, 2019, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $63.3 million, of which $48.7 million related to the cheese reporting unit and $14.6 million related to the All Whites trademark, both of which are reported in our Refrigerated Retail segment.
During the year ended September 30, 2018, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $124.9 million related to the Weetabix trademark, which is included in our Weetabix segment.
For additional information on other intangible assets and goodwill, see Note 2 and Note 7, respectively, within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Gain on Sale of Business
During the year ended September 30, 2017,2019, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge totaling $26.5 million. The goodwill impairment chargegains of $126.6 million related to Dymatize,the 8th Avenue Transactions, which is reportedincluded foreign exchange losses previously recorded in the Active Nutrition segment.accumulated other comprehensive income of $42.1 million. For additional information on gain on sale of business, see Note 6 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In connection with completing the BellRing formation transactions and the 8th Avenue Transactions, funding acquisitions and managing our capital structure, we completed the following transactionsactivities (for additional information, see Notes 1, 4, 166, 17, and 21 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”):
Fiscal 20182020
•$1,650.0 million principal value issued of 4.625% senior notes, $22.0 million premium received;
•$1,000.0 million principal value repaid and $41.3 million premium payment made on the extinguishment of our 5.50% senior notes maturing in March 2025;
•$122.2 million principal value repaid and $8.5 million premium payment made on the extinguishment of our 8.00% senior notes;
•$1,309.5 million outstanding principal value repaid on our term loan;
•entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the “Second AR Credit Agreement”) providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”);
•$500.0 million borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility;
•$500.0 million outstanding principal value repaid on the Revolving Credit Facility;
•$524.4 million net proceeds received by BellRing from the IPO, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions;
•$1,225.0 million borrowed under our 2020 bridge facility agreement (the “2020 Bridge Loan”);
•$1,225.0 million principal value 2020 Bridge Loan assumed by BellRing in connection with the IPO, releasing us and our subsidiaries (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) from any material obligations thereunder while we retained the proceeds from the 2020 Bridge Loan;
•$1,225.0 million outstanding principal value repaid by BellRing on the 2020 Bridge Loan;
•BellRing entered into a credit agreement (the “BellRing Credit Agreement”) providing for debt facilities consisting of a $700.0 million term B loan facility (the “BellRing Term B Facility”) and a $200.0 million revolving credit facility (the “BellRing Revolving Credit Facility”);
•$700.0 million borrowed by BellRing under the BellRing Term B Facility;
•$195.0 million borrowed by BellRing under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility;
•$165.0 million outstanding principal value repaid by BellRing on the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility;
•$587.8 million paid (including broker’s commissions and amounts settled subsequent to fiscal 2020) for the repurchase of 6.1 million shares of our common stock;
•$46.4 million paid for share repurchase contracts that settle in November 2020 (subsequent to the end of the period) and will result in the receipt of either 0.6 million shares of our common stock or cash of $47.5 million; and
•our Revolving Credit Facility had outstanding letters of credit of $18.8 million, which reduced the available borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility to $731.2 million, at September 30, 2020.
Fiscal 2019
•$625.0 million principal value 2018 Bridge Loan assumed by 8th Avenue in connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions, releasing us and our subsidiaries (other than 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries) from any material obligations thereunder while we retained the proceeds from the 2018 Bridge Loan;
•$250.0 million received from a third party as part of the 8th Avenue Transactions;
•$863.0 million principal value paid on our existing term loan using the $875.0 million of proceeds received from the 8th Avenue Transactions, net of debt issuance costs paid related to the 2018 Bridge Loan and other transaction costs;
•$60.0 million outstanding principal value repurchased and retired of our 5.625% senior notes, 5.75% senior notes and 5.00% senior notes;
•$330.8 million paid (including broker’s commissions and amounts settled subsequent to fiscal 2019) for the repurchase of 3.3 million shares of our common stock;
•$750.0 million principal value issued of 5.50% senior notes maturing in December 2029; and
•$257.4 million of payments, excluding interest, made in December 2018 and October 2019 (subsequent to the end of fiscal 2019) to former holders of shares of Bob Evans common stock who had demanded appraisal of their shares under Delaware law and had not yet been paid for their shares.
Fiscal 2018
•$1,000.0 million principal value issued of 5.625% senior notes due in January 2028 issuednotes;
•$218.7 million paid (including broker’s commissions) for the repurchase of 2.8 million shares of the Company’sour common stockstock;
•$630.0 million principal payment and $30.8 million premium payment made on the extinguishment of theour 6.00% senior notes due in December 2022notes;
•$252.5 million principal payment made at a discount of $7.7 million to repurchase and retire portions of theour principal balances of theour 5.625% senior notes, due in January 2028, 5.75% senior notes due in March 2027 and 5.00% senior notes due in August 2026notes;
•$15.3 million principal payment and $2.0 million premium payment made to repurchase and retire portions of theour 8.00% senior notes due in July 2025notes;
Amended•amended our amended and restatedprior credit agreement and certain joinders thereto (as further amended and restated, the “Credit Agreement”) such thatto reduce by 25 basis points the interest rate margin for the term loan under our Credit Agreement was reduced by 25 basis points,prior credit agreement, such that a term loan that is a Eurodollar Rate Loan accrues interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.00% per annum and a term loan that is a Base Rate Loan accrues interest at the Base Rate plus 1.00% per annum (as such capitalized terms are defined in our Credit Agreement)prior credit agreement);
Credit Agreement currently has outstanding letters of•amended our prior credit of $18.5 million which reduced the available borrowing capacity to $781.5 million at September 30, 2018
Amended our Credit Agreementagreement to, among other things, permit us to designate each of 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries as an unrestricted subsidiary, permit the disposition of (and release of liens on) assets of and equity interests in the Company’sour unrestricted subsidiaries and release such unrestricted subsidiaries as guarantorsguarantors; and
•$625.0 million principal value bridge loan obtained on September 24, 2018. On October 1,borrowed under the 2018 subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we closed the 8th Avenue Transactions and the bridge loan was assumed by 8th Avenue, releasing us from any obligations thereunder while we retained the proceeds from the bridge loan. In addition to the bridge loan proceeds, we received $250.0 million from affiliates of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. as part of the 8th Avenue Transactions. The total $875.0 million of proceeds, net of debt issuance costs paid related to the bridge loan and other transaction costs, were used to pay down our existing term loan.
Fiscal 2017
$317.8 million paid for repurchase of 4.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock
$1,500.0 million principal value of 5.75% senior notes due in March 2027 issued, $41.2 million premium received
$1,000.0 million principal value of 5.50% senior notes due in March 2025 issued
$2,200.0 million principal value term loan issued
$2,070.5 million principal payment and $219.8 million premium payment made on extinguishment of the 6.75% senior notes due in December 2021, 7.375% senior notes due in February 2022 and 7.75% senior notes due in March 2024 and a portion of the 8.00% senior notes due in July 2025
Amended and restated our Credit Agreement, which provides for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate available principal amount of $800.0 million
Fiscal 2016
$1,750.0 million principal value of 5.00% senior notes due in August 2026 issued
$1,242.0 million principal payment and $88.0 million tender offer premium payment made on extinguishment of a portion of the 7.375% senior notes due in February 2022
$374.4 million term loan principal payoff
Bridge Loan.
The following table shows cash flow data for fiscal years2020, 2019 and 2018, 2017 and 2016, which is discussed below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended September 30, |
| (dollars in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 719.3 |
| | $ | 386.7 |
| | $ | 502.4 |
|
| Cash used in investing activities | (1,676.9 | ) | | (2,090.8 | ) | | (196.1 | ) |
| Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 423.4 |
| | 2,053.1 |
| | (4.5 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (2.0 | ) | | 33.3 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (536.2 | ) | | $ | 382.3 |
| | $ | 302.2 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| (dollars in millions) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash provided by (used in): | | | | | |
| Operating activities | $ | 625.6 | | | $ | 688.0 | | | $ | 718.6 | |
| Investing activities | (218.5) | | | 26.7 | | | (1,675.6) | |
| Financing activities | (272.0) | | | (652.4) | | | 423.4 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 3.8 | | | (2.3) | | | (2.0) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 138.9 | | | $ | 60.0 | | | $ | (535.6) | |
Historically, we have generated and expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from operations. We believe our cash on hand, cash flows from operations and current and possible future credit facilities will be sufficient to satisfy our future working capital requirements, interest payments, research and development activities, capital expenditures, pension contributions and other financing requirements for the foreseeable future. Our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations is dependent on general economic conditions, competitive pressures and other business risk factors. As a result of uncertainties in the near-term outlook for our business caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, we have taken steps across the organization to limit discretionary expenses and re-prioritize our capital projects and we continue to focus on cash flow generation. We temporarily suspended our share repurchase program and borrowed under our revolving credit facilities in order to increase our cash position and financial flexibility in the second quarter of fiscal 2020. As a result of our strong operating cash flows and our healthy liquidity position, in the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we were able to resume our share repurchase program in May 2020 and repaid such borrowings under our revolving credit facilities prior to the end of fiscal 2020. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and cash on hand to satisfy our cash needs. Additionally, we expect to generate positive cash flows from the operations of our diverse businesses; however, we continue to evaluate and take action, as necessary, to preserve adequate liquidity, navigate the uncertainty caused by the pandemic and ensure that our business can continue to operate during these uncertain times. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, or are otherwise unable to comply with the terms of our credit facilities, we may be required to seek additional financing alternatives, which may require waivers under our Second AR Credit Agreement and our indentures governing our senior notes, in order to generate additional cash. There can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain additional financing or any such waivers on terms acceptable to us or at all. For additional information on our debt, refer to Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Short-term financing needs primarily consist of working capital requirements and principal and interest payments on our long-term debt and dividend payments on our cumulative preferred stock.debt. Long-term financing needs will depend largely on potential growth opportunities, including acquisition activity and other strategic transactions and repayment or refinancing of our long-term debt obligations. We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases in open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally, we may seek to repurchase shares of our common stock. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
Obligations under the Second AR Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by our existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (other than immaterial domestic subsidiaries, certain excluded subsidiaries and subsidiaries we designate as unrestricted subsidiaries, which include 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries and
BellRing Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries) and are secured by security interests in substantially all of our assets and the assets of its subsidiary guarantors, but excluding, in each case, real property.
All of our senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by each of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries, other than immaterial subsidiaries, receivables finance subsidiaries and subsidiaries we designate as unrestricted subsidiaries, which include 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries and BellRing Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries. These guarantees are subject to release in certain circumstances.
BellRing Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries and 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries are not obligors or guarantors under the Company’s debt facilities or senior notes.
Obligations under the BellRing Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries of BellRing (other than immaterial subsidiaries, certain excluded subsidiaries and subsidiaries of BellRing it designates as unrestricted subsidiaries) and are secured by security interests in substantially all of the assets of BellRing and its subsidiary guarantors (other than real property), subject to limited exceptions. We and our subsidiaries (other than BellRing and certain of its subsidiaries) are not obligors or guarantors under the BellRing Credit Agreement.
Operating Activities
Fiscal 20182020 compared to 20172019
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2018 increased2020 decreased by $332.6$62.4 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2017,2019, primarily due to an increase in cash settlements and premiums paid (compared to cash settlements received in the prior year) of $110.7 million related to our interest rate swaps, lower segment profit driven by our Foodservice and BellRing Brands segments, increased payments of employee incentives, higher advertising and promotional spending and higher interest payments of $4.4 million. These negative impacts were partially offset by favorable changes in working capital of $15.1 million, primarily related to higher cash outflows for inventory in the prior year due to inventory builds in our BellRing Brands, Foodservice and Weetabix segments, partially offset by unfavorable fluctuations in the timing of purchases and payments of trade payables, as well as lower income tax payments (net of refunds) of $10.6 million.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2019 decreased by $30.6 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2018, driven by increased investment to build inventory levels in our BellRing Brands, Foodservice and Weetabix segments and the absence of cash flows in fiscal 2019 from our historical Private Brands segment, as well as higher income tax payments of $42.0 million and $10.4 million of legal settlements paid during the year ended September 30, 2019. These negative impacts were partially offset by increased cash proceeds received of $28.7 million related to settlements of our interest rate swaps that were designated as hedging instruments, as well as incremental cash flows from our currentprior year acquisition of Bob Evans and the prior year acquisition of the Weetabix Group and strong growth within our existing businesses, primarily in our Refrigerated Food and Active Nutrition segments.Evans. Additionally, cash provided by operating activities increased due towe made lower payments of advertising and consumer expenses and employee incentives, as well as lower payments for income taxes of $6.6 million, partially offset by increased interest payments of $40.3$29.5 million, primarily due to a decrease in the principal balance of outstanding debt resulting from debt being repaid and repurchased and retired during fiscal 2019 and 2018. Operating cash flows in the year ended September 30, 2018 were negatively impacted by an accelerated pension funding contribution of $29.6 million made to our qualified defined benefit plans in the United States. Operating cash flows in the year ended September 30, 2017 were negatively impacted by $103.0 million of legal settlements paid.U.S.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2017 decreased by $115.7 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2016. This decrease was driven by $103.0 million of legal settlements paid in the year ended September 30, 2017, increased payments of advertising and promotional expenses, increased employee incentive payments paid in the year ended September 30, 2017 on above target fiscal 2016 performance and increased interest payments of $24.0 million, partially offset by lower payments for income taxes of $43.8 million.
Investing Activities
Fiscal 20182020 compared to 20172019
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2018 decreased by $413.92020 was $218.5 million compared to cash provided by investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2017, driven by a decrease in2019 of $26.7 million. The cash paid for acquisitions of $460.8 million, partially offset by an increase in capital expenditures of $34.6 million, which was primarily related to the cage-free housing conversion at our Bloomfield, Nebraska egg facility. The prior year cash flow was also impacted by $10.3 million of proceeds received from the sale of our cereal plant located in Modesto, California and the sale of our Dymatize manufacturing facility located in Farmers Branch, Texas.
Fiscal 2017 compared to 2016
Cash used in investing activitiesoutflow during the year ended September 30, 2017 increased by $1,894.7 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2016. The increased cash outflow2020 was driven by an increase in cash paid for acquisitionscapital expenditures, purchases of $1,820.8equity securities of $29.2 million and an increase in capital expenditurescash payments of $68.9$19.9 million related to our acquisition of Henningsen. These negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in proceeds received of $21.0 million largely resulting from the sale
termination of property$448.7 million notional value of our cross-currency swaps that were designated as hedging instruments and assets held for sale of $8.5 million. Cash used in investing activities was also impacted in fiscal 2016 by netinsurance proceeds received from the sale of businesses of $7.3$10.0 million and changes in restricted cash related to pledged collateral fora fire at our commodityBloomfield, Nebraska layer facility. The cash inflow during the year ended September 30, 2019 was driven by proceeds received of $266.8 million related to the 8th Avenue Transactions and energy derivative contracts.an increase in proceeds received of $26.9 million related to settlements of our cross-currency swaps that were designated as hedging instruments.
Capital expenditures were $190.4$234.6 million and $121.5$273.9 million in the years ended September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The largest individual capital expenditure project in fiscal 2020 related to the purchase of a previously leased manufacturing plant in Sulphur Springs, Texas.
Fiscal 2019 compared to 2018
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2019 was $26.7 million compared to cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2018 of $1,675.6 million. The cash inflow during the year ended September 30, 2019 was driven by proceeds received of $266.8 million related to the 8th Avenue Transactions and an increase
in proceeds received of $26.9 million related to settlements of our cross-currency swaps that were designated as hedging instruments. The cash outflow during the year ended September 30, 2018 was primarily due to cash payments of $1,454.4 million related to our fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans.
Capital expenditures were $273.9 million and $225.0 million in the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase was primarily relateddue to the cage-free housing conversion at the Michael Foods Bloomfield, Nebraskaconstruction of a new precooked egg facility as well as capital expenditures related to businesses acquired in fiscal 2017.Norwalk, Iowa.
Financing Activities
Fiscal 2020
Cash used in financing activities was $272.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2020. BellRing Brands, Inc. received $524.4 million net proceeds from the IPO, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. We received proceeds of $1,650.0 million from the issuance of our 4.625% senior notes, borrowed $1,225.0 million under the 2020 Bridge Loan and borrowed $500.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility. BellRing borrowed $700.0 million under the BellRing Term B Facility, at a discount of $14.0 million, and borrowed $195.0 million under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility. These issuances and borrowings, combined with proceeds received of $2.2 million from a municipal bond, resulted in total proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $4,258.2 million. Additionally, we received a premium of $22.0 million related to the issuance of additional 4.625% senior notes in August 2020. In connection with the senior note issuances, borrowings and our entry into the Second AR Credit Agreement, we paid $45.3 million in debt issuance costs and deferred financing fees. We repaid the outstanding principal balances on our term loan, our 5.50% senior notes maturing in March 2025 and our 8.00% senior notes, repaid $500.0 million of outstanding principal borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility and made a principal payment on the municipal bond. BellRing repaid the outstanding principal balance on the 2020 Bridge Loan, repaid $165.0 million of outstanding principal borrowings on the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility and made principal payments on the BellRing Term B Facility, which resulted in total repayments of long-term debt of $4,349.1 million. We paid premiums of $49.8 million related to the early extinguishment of our 5.50% senior notes maturing in March 2025 and our 8.00% senior notes. In connection with the IPO, we were refunded $15.3 million of debt issuance costs paid in connection with the 2020 Bridge Loan. We paid $589.1 million, including broker’s commissions, for the repurchase of shares of our common stock, which included repurchases of our common stock that were accrued at September 30, 2019 and did not settle until fiscal 2020, as well as a premium of $46.4 million for share repurchase contracts that settle in November 2020.
Fiscal 2019
Cash used in financing activities was $652.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2019. During the year ended September 30, 2019, we received proceeds of $750.0 million from the issuance of our 5.50% senior notes maturing in December 2029. In connection with this senior notes issuance and the receipt of consents from holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 5.00% senior notes (see Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”), we paid $16.3 million in debt issuance and modification costs. We repaid $863.0 million outstanding principal value of our term loan, and we repurchased and retired $60.0 million principal value of our 5.625% senior notes, 5.75% senior notes and 5.00% senior notes, at a $4.0 million discount. These repayments and repurchases, combined with payments related to our capital lease, resulted in total net repayments of long-term debt of $919.1 million. Additionally, payments of $253.6 million, excluding interest, were made to former holders of shares of Bob Evans common stock who had demanded appraisal and, who at the time, had not yet been paid for their shares of Bob Evans common stock. We also paid $322.1 million, including broker’s commissions, for the repurchase of shares of our common stock and we received proceeds from the exercises of stock awards of $112.6 million.
Fiscal 2018
Cash provided by financing activities was $423.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2018. During the year ended September 30, 2018, we received proceeds of $1,625.0 million from the issuances of our 5.625% senior notes due in January 2028 and the bridge loan.2018 Bridge Loan. In connection with the senior notes and bridge loan2018 Bridge Loan issuances, the amendment of our Credit Agreementprior credit agreement in August 2018 and payments on prior year senior notes issuances, we paid $24.9 million in debt issuance costs and deferred financing fees.fees. We repaid therepurchased and retired $645.3 million outstanding principal balancevalue of our 6.00% senior notes due in December 2022, and 8.00% senior notes a portion of thend repurchased and retired $252.5 million principal balances of eachvalue of our 5.625% senior notes, due in January 2028, 5.75% senior notes due in March 2027,and 5.00% senior notes, due in August 2026at a discount of $7.7 million. These repayments and 8.00% senior notes due in July 2025 and maderepurchases, combined with quarterly principal payments on our term loan, which resulted in net payments of $912.1 million. We paid premiums and other expenses of $33.7$33.7 million related to the early extinguishment of theour 6.00% senior notes and our 8.00% senior notes and costs associated with the amendment of our Credit Agreement.prior credit agreement. We also repurchased 2.8 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $218.7 million, including brokers’broker’s commissions, during the year ended September 30, 2018.
Cash provided by financing activities was $2,053.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2017. During the year ended September 30, 2017, we received proceeds from the issuanceFiscal 2016
Cash used in financing activities was $4.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2016. During the year ended September 30, 2016, we completed a debt refinancing in which we issued $1,750.0 million principal value of 5.00% senior notes due in August 2026 and utilized the proceeds to fund a tender offer of our 7.375% senior notes due in February 2022, which resulted in a principal payment of $1,242.0 million. Additionally, we repaid the $374.4 million outstanding balance of our prior term loan. Related to the refinancing, we paid a tender premium of $88.0 million for the early extinguishment of the 7.375% senior notes due in February 2022. We also made a $10.9 million payment related to the December 2015 conversion of 0.9 million shares of our 3.75% Series B Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock.
Debt Covenants
Second AR Credit Agreement
Under the terms of our Second AR Credit Agreement, we are required to comply with a financial covenant consisting of a ratio for quarterly maximum senior secured net leverage ratio (as defined in the Second AR Credit Agreement) not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00, measured as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, if, as of the last day of such fiscal quarter, the aggregate outstanding amount of all revolving credit loans, swing line loans and letter of credit obligations (subject to certain exceptions specified in the Second AR Credit Agreement) exceeds 30% of our revolving credit commitments. As of September 30, 2018,2020, we were not required to comply with such financial covenant as the aggregate amount of the aforementioned obligations did not exceed 30%. of our revolving credit commitments. We do not believe non-compliance is reasonably likely in the foreseeable future.
Our Second AR Credit Agreement provides for incremental revolving and term loan facilities, and also permits us to incur additionalother secured or unsecured debt, if, among other conditions, our pro forma consolidated interest coveragecertain financial ratios are met, as defined and specified in the Second AR Credit Agreement.
BellRing Credit Agreement
Under the terms of the BellRing Credit Agreement, BellRing is required to comply with a financial covenant requiring BellRing to maintain a total net leverage ratio (as defined in the BellRing Credit Agreement) would be greater than or equalnot to 2.00exceed 6.00 to 1.00, after giving effect to such new debt. Asmeasured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The total net leverage ratio of BellRing did not exceed this threshold as of September 30, 2018, our pro forma consolidated interest coverage ratio exceeded this threshold.2020. We do not believe non-compliance is reasonably likely in the foreseeable future.
The BellRing Credit Agreement provides for incremental revolving and term facilities, and also permits other secured or unsecured debt, if, among other conditions, certain financial ratios are met, as defined and specified in the BellRing Credit Agreement.
Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts and commitments which obligate us to make payments in the future. The table below sets forth our significant future obligations by time period as of September 30, 2018.2020. For consideration of the table below, “Less Than 1 Year” refers to obligations due between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019, “1-3 Years” refers to obligations due between October 1, 20192020 and September 30, 2021, “3-5“1-3 Years” refers to obligations due between October 1, 2021 and September 30, 2023, “3-5 Years” refers to obligations due between October 1, 2023 and September 30, 2025 and “More Than 5 Years” refers to any obligations due after September 30, 2023.2025.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | Total (g) | | Less Than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | More Than 5 Years |
| Debt(a) | $ | 7,049.7 | | | $ | 64.9 | | | $ | 72.2 | | | $ | 572.2 | | | $ | 6,340.4 | |
| Interest obligations(b)(c) | 2,708.7 | | | 373.3 | | | 739.2 | | | 699.6 | | | 896.6 | |
| Purchase obligations(d) | 4,110.4 | | | 1,134.2 | | | 1,203.3 | | | 789.7 | | | 983.2 | |
| Deferred compensation obligations(e) | 29.7 | | | 0.5 | | | 4.3 | | | 7.5 | | | 17.4 | |
| Net benefit obligations(f) | 376.8 | | | 28.0 | | | 60.1 | | | 65.1 | | | 223.6 | |
| Total | $ | 14,275.3 | | | $ | 1,600.9 | | | $ | 2,079.1 | | | $ | 2,134.1 | | | $ | 8,461.2 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (dollars in millions) | Total (g) | | Less Than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | More Than 5 Years |
| Debt (a) | $ | 7,292.4 |
| | $ | 22.1 |
| | $ | 44.1 |
| | $ | 44.0 |
| | $ | 7,182.2 |
|
| Interest on long-term debt(b) | 2,776.7 |
| | 371.9 |
| | 741.1 |
| | 737.4 |
| | 926.3 |
|
| Operating lease obligations(c) | 209.5 |
| | 28.2 |
| | 51.0 |
| | 45.5 |
| | 84.8 |
|
| Purchase obligations(d) | 2,651.1 |
| | 1,009.3 |
| | 877.5 |
| | 399.1 |
| | 365.2 |
|
| Deferred compensation obligations(e) | 52.2 |
| | 24.7 |
| | 7.0 |
| | 5.4 |
| | 15.1 |
|
| Net benefit obligations(f) | 309.5 |
| | 25.4 |
| | 54.2 |
| | 59.0 |
| | 170.9 |
|
| Total | $ | 13,291.4 |
| | $ | 1,481.6 |
| | $ | 1,774.9 |
| | $ | 1,290.4 |
| | $ | 8,744.5 |
|
____________(a)Debt obligations include amounts owed by both us and BellRing. However, obligations under the BellRing Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries of BellRing (other than immaterial subsidiaries, certain excluded subsidiaries and subsidiaries of BellRing it designates as unrestricted subsidiaries) and are secured by security interests in substantially all of the assets of BellRing and its subsidiary guarantors (other than real property), subject to limited exceptions. We and our subsidiaries (other than BellRing and certain of its subsidiaries) are not obligors or guarantors under the BellRing debt facilities. Additionally, we have designated BellRing Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries, so they are not obligors or guarantors under our debt facilities.
| |
(a) | Debt obligations exclude the outstanding $625.0 million principal balance of our bridge loan outstanding, which was classified as held for sale at September 30, 2018, as 8th Avenue assumed all repayment obligations thereunder at the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions on October 1, 2018. On October 1, 2018, we made a principal payment of $863.0 million on our term loan in connection with the net proceeds received from the 8th Avenue Transactions. |
| |
(b) | The October 1, 2018 principal payment on our term loan, as explained in (a), reduced our total future interest payments by approximately $206 million. |
(b)Interest obligations include payments related to both our and BellRing’s debt and as noted in (a), neither party nor its respective subsidiaries are guarantors or obligors of the other’s debt. To the extent that the interest rate is variable and amounts borrowed under the Second AR Credit Agreement and BellRing Credit Agreement may fluctuate, payments included in this table represent estimated interest payments on the current outstanding balance based on interest rates at September 30, 2020. Amounts borrowed, including interest, under the Second AR Credit Agreement and the BellRing Credit Agreement must be repaid by March 2025 and October 2024, respectively.
(c)As of September 30, 2018,2020, we had interest rate swaps that require monthly or lump sum settlements with a notional value of $2,723.9$2,287.7 million consisting of:
•$74.671.7 million, which will result in monthly cash payments which began in July 2016 and will continue through May 2021;
•$750.01,666.0 million, which will result in four netnine lump sum settlements with the first occurring in July 20192021 and the last in July 2021;2026;
$899.3 million which will result in a net settlement in December 2019; and
•$1,000.0200.0 million that obligatesobligate us to pay a fixed rate and receive one-month LIBOR and requiresrequire monthly cash settlements through May 2024; and
•$350.0 million that began in June 2017obligates BellRing to pay a fixed rate and end in May 2024.receive one-month LIBOR and require monthly cash settlements through December 2022.
Those payments have been excluded from this table. For additional information on our interest rate swaps, refer to “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Item 7A of this report and Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
| |
(c) | Operating lease obligations consist of minimum rental(d)Purchase obligations are legally binding agreements to purchase goods, services or equipment that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased and/or penalties imposed for failing to meet contracted minimum purchase quantities (such as “take-or-pay” contracts); fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Estimates of future open market egg prices and feed costs were used to derive the amounts reported for our egg contracts. (e)Deferred compensation obligations were allocated to time periods based on existing payment plans for terminated and severed employees. The estimated timing of distributions to current employees and directors is based on age and expected service term and participants’ payout elections. We fund a portion of our deferred compensation obligations by investing in certain mutual funds in the same amounts as selected by the participating employees. At September 30, 2020, we had an investment balance of $12.8 million partially offsetting these liabilities. (f)Benefit obligations consist of future payments related to pension and other postretirement benefits as estimated by an actuarial valuation and shown in Note 19 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” (g)We have excluded from the table above: •$11.5 million, which includes interest, penalties and indemnification liabilities, under noncancelable operating leases, as shown in Note 17 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” |
| |
(d) | Purchase obligations are legally binding agreements to purchase goods, services or equipment that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased and/or penalties imposed for failing to meet contracted minimum purchase quantities; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Estimates of future open market egg prices and feed costs were used to derive the amounts reported for our egg contracts. |
| |
(e) | Deferred compensation obligations were allocated to time periods based on existing payment plans for terminated and severed employees, the estimated timing of distributions to current employees based on age and expected service term for members of our Board of Directors, and includes $24.1 million related to the termination of Bob Evans’s deferred compensation plans that we will pay within the next 12 months as a result of the acquisition of Bob Evans (see Note 4 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”). |
| |
(f) | Benefit obligations consist of future payments related to pension and other postretirement benefits as estimated by an actuarial valuation and shown in Note 18 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” |
| |
(g) | We have excluded from the table above: |
interest and penalties for certain provisions of Accounting Standards CodificationASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” of $3.5 million associated with liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of payments, if any; and
•payments for workers compensation, general liability and auto liability claim losses for which we had a liability recorded of $24.0$21.6 million at September 30, 2018,2020, of which $10.8$8.7 million was classified as current, due to the uncertainty of the amount and timing of payments; andpayments.
amounts owed to former holders of 3.3 million shares of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares under Delaware law and had not withdrawn their appraisal demands and had not been paid for their shares of Bob Evans common stock due to the uncertainty of the amount and timing of payments. Related to these shares, the Company accrued $267.0 million, all of which was classified as non-current at September 30, 2018, which is the number of shares of Bob Evans common stock for which former Bob Evans stockholders have demanded appraisal and not withdrawn their demands multiplied by the $77.00 per share merger consideration plus accrued interest at the Federal Reserve Discount Rate plus a spread of 5.00%.
COMMODITY TRENDS AND SEASONALITY
Our Company is exposed to price fluctuations primarily from purchases of raw materials, including ingredients and packaging materials, fuelenergy and energy.other inputs. Primary exposures include wheat, oats, rice, corn, other grain products, vegetable oils, eggs, pork,sows, pasta, potatoes, cheese, milk, butter, driedvegetable oils, dairy- and vegetable-based proteins, sugar and other sweeteners, fruit, nuts, dairy and soy-based proteins, cocoa, corn syrup and sugar, natural gas, propane, electricity, diesel fuel, linerboardcarbon dioxide, folding cartons, corrugated boxes, plastic containers, flexible and rigid plastic film and containers, beverage packaging, cartonboard, and aseptic foil and plastic lined cartonboard. These costs have been volatile in recent years, especially in fiscal 2020 due to the market impacts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, and future changes in such costs may cause our results of operations and our operating margins to fluctuate significantly. We manage the impact of cost increases, wherever possible, on commercially reasonable terms, by locking in prices on the quantities required to meet our anticipated production requirements. In addition, we may offset the effect of increased costs by raising prices to our customers. However, for competitive reasons, we may not be able to pass along the full effect of increases in raw materials and other input costs as we incur them. Inflationary pressures also can have an adverse effect on the Companyus through higher raw material and fuelenergy costs. We believe that inflation has not had a material adverse impact on our operations for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, but could have a material impact in the future if inflation rates were to significantly exceed our ability to achieve price increases.
Demand for certain of our products may be influenced by holidays, changes in seasons or other events.events, which may impact customer and consumer spending patterns and the timing of promotional activities. For example, demand for our egg products, potatoes, sausage, side dishes, butter and cheese tends to increase during the Thanksgiving, Christmas, Easter and other holiday seasons, which may result in increased net sales during the first quarterand third quarters of our fiscal year. We also have experienced increased demand for the snacking and baking nuts manufactured and distributed through our Private Brands segment during the Thanksgiving, Christmas and holiday seasons. Demand for our Malt-O-Meal hot wheat, Better Oats oatmeal and Ready Brek hot oats cereals also tends to be seasonably skewed towards the colder winter season. Demand for various products in our BellRing Brands segment tends to be lower during our first fiscal quarter as a result of the holiday season. However, on a consolidated basis our revenues and results of operations generally are distributed relatively evenly over the quarters of our fiscal year.
CURRENCY
Certain sales and costs of our foreign operations were denominated in Pounds Sterling, Canadian Dollars, Euros, South African Rand, Kenyan Shilling,Shillings, Mexican Peso,Pesos, Chinese Yuan and United Arab Emirates Dirham.Dirhams. Consequently, profits from these businesses can be impacted by fluctuations in the value of these currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of September 30, 20182020 and September 30, 2017,2019, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K that are likely to have a material impact on our financial positioncondition or results of operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesGAAP requires the use of judgment, estimates and assumptions. We make these subjective determinations after considering our historical performance, management’s experience, current economic trends and events and information from outside sources. Inherent in this process is the possibility that actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions for any particular period.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” Our critical accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations.
Revenue Recognition - RevenueWe recognize revenue when performance obligations have been satisfied by transferring control of our goods to customers. Control is recognized when titlegenerally transferred upon delivery of the goods is transferred to the customer. At the time of delivery, the customer is invoiced using previously agreed-upon credit terms. Shipping and/or handling costs that occur before the customer obtains control of the goods are deemed fulfillment activities and are accounted for as specified by the shipping terms. Net sales reflect gross sales, including amounts billed tofulfillment costs. Our contracts with customers for shippinggenerally contain one performance obligation.
Many of our contracts with customers include some form of variable consideration. The most common forms of variable consideration are trade promotions, rebates and handling, less sales discounts and trade allowances (including promotional price buy downs and new item promotional funding). Customer trade allowances are generally computeddiscounts. Variable consideration is treated as a percentagereduction of gross sales. Productsrevenue at the time product revenue is recognized. Depending on the nature of the variable consideration, we use either the “expected value” or the “most likely amount” method to determine variable consideration. We do not believe that there will be significant changes to our estimates of variable consideration when any uncertainties are generallyresolved with customers. We review and update estimates of variable consideration quarterly. Uncertainties related to the estimates of variable consideration are resolved in a short time frame and do not require any additional constraint on variable consideration.
Our products are sold with no right of return, except in the case of goods which do not meet product specifications or are damageddamaged. No services beyond this assurance-type warranty are provided to customers. Customer remedies include either a cash refund or an exchange of the product. As a result, the right of return and related reserves are maintainedrefund liability is estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue based on historical sales return history. If additional rights of return are granted, revenue recognition is deferred. Estimated reductions to revenue for customer incentive offerings are based upon customer redemption history.experience.
Business Combinations -We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Any excess of the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets over the purchase price is recorded as a gain on bargain purchase. Significant judgment is often required in estimating the fair value of assets acquired, particularly intangible assets. As a result, in the case of significant acquisitions we normally obtain the assistance of a third party valuation specialist in estimating fair values of tangible and intangible assets. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on expectations and assumptions about the future, considering the perspective of marketplace participants. While we believe those expectations and assumptions are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur, which could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.
Long-Lived Assets - We review long-lived assets, including leasehold improvements, property and equipment, and amortized intangible assets and ROU assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less the cost to sell. Recoverability of assets held for sale is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to theirits fair value less estimated costs to sell. Estimating future cash flows and calculating the fair value of assets requires significant estimates and assumptions by management.
At September 30, 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of $14.6 million for the All Whites trademark to adjust its carrying value to zero. The impairment charge for the All Whites trademark is the result of a strategic decision made by Refrigerated Retail management in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019 to discontinue use of the brand name. All products previously sold under the All Whites brand name are now being marketed and sold under the Bob Evans Egg Whites brand name. No impairments of long-lived assets were recorded in the years ended September 30, 2020 or 2018.
Indefinite Lived Assets - Trademarks with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year following the annual forecasting process, or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate the trademark may be impaired. In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform
the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
In fiscal 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, we elected not to perform a qualitative assessment and instead performed a quantitative impairment test. The estimated fair value is determined using an income-based approach (the relief-from-royalty method), which requires significant assumptions for each brand, including estimates regarding future revenue growth, discount rates and appropriate royalty rates. We estimated royalty rates based on consideration of several factors for each brand, including profit levels, research of external royalty rates by third party experts and the relative importance of each brand to the Company. Revenue growth assumptions are based on historical trends and management’s expectations for future growth by brand. The discount rates are based on a weighted-average cost of capital utilizing industry market data of similar companies.
AtFor the year ended September 30, 2018,2020, we recorded anconducted impairment chargereviews and concluded there was no impairment of $124.9 million for the Weetabix trademark to adjust its carrying value to its estimated fair value of $261.8 million. The impairment charge for the Weetabix trademark is a result of reduced branded cereal volumes related to our pricing reset and shifting consumer preferences to private label products.indefinite-lived intangible assets. Estimated fair value of all remaining indefinite-lived trademarks exceeded book value by 46%24% or greater at September 30, 2018, with the exception of the Honey Bunches of Oats trademark which exceeded book value by 17%, the Great Grains trademark which exceeded book value by 4% and the recently acquired Bob Evans trademark which exceeded book value by less than 1%.2020. Changes in the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets could result in additional impairment charges in future periods. Additionally, certain factors have the potential to create variances in the estimated fair values of the our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which also could result in incremental impairment charges. These factors include (i) failure to achieve forecasted revenue growth rates as a result of impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, among other impacts, (ii) increases in the discount rate or (iii) a significant change in profitability and the corresponding royalty rate.
For the yearsyear ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2019, we conducted impairment reviews and concluded there was no impairment of other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Estimated fair value of all indefinite-lived trademarks exceeded book value by 31% or greater at September 30, 2019, with the exception of the Bob Evans trademark, which had a book value of $400.0 million, which exceeded book value by 13%.
At September 30, 2018, we recorded an impairment charge of $124.9 million for the Weetabix trademark to adjust its carrying value to its estimated fair value of $261.8 million. The impairment charge for the Weetabix trademark was a result of reduced branded cereal volumes related to Weetabix’s pricing reset and shifting consumer preferences to private label products. Estimated fair value of all remaining indefinite-lived trademarks exceeded book value by 46% or greater at September 30, 2018, with the exception of the Honey Bunches of Oats trademark which exceeded book value by 17%, the Great Grains trademark which exceeded book value by 4% and the Bob Evans trademark which exceeded book value by less than 1%.
Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquired businesses over the fair market value of their identifiable net assets. We conduct a goodwill impairment qualitative assessment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year following the annual forecasting process, or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. The goodwill impairment qualitative assessment requires us to perform an assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of the business is less than its carrying amount. The qualitative assessment considers various factors, including the macroeconomic environment, industry and market specific conditions, financial performance, cost impacts and issues or events specific to the business. If adverse qualitative trends are identified that could negatively impact the fair value of the business, we perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test. In fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016,2020, we elected not to perform a qualitative assessment and instead performed a quantitative impairment test for all reporting units, except for BellRing Brands. We performed a qualitative test for the BellRing Brands reporting unit, and determined there were no adverse trends that could negatively impact the fair value of the business. In fiscal 2019 and 2018, we elected not to perform a qualitative assessment and instead performed a quantitative impairment test for all reporting units.
Under ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which we early adopted on a prospective basis in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, theThe quantitative goodwill impairment test requires an entity to compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.Theunit. The estimated fair values of each reporting unit were determined using a combined income and market approach with a greater weighting on the income approach (75% of the calculation for all reporting units). The income approach is based on discounted future cash flows and requires significant assumptions, including estimates regarding future revenue, profitability, capital requirements and capital requirements.discount rates. The market approach (25% of the calculation for all reporting units) is based on a market multiple (revenue and EBITDA“EBITDA,” which stands for earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and requires an estimate of appropriate multiples based on market data. Revenue growth assumptions (along with profitability and cash flow assumptions) were based on historical trends for the reporting units and management'smanagement’s expectations for future growth. The discount rates were based on a risk adjusted weighted-average cost of capital utilizing industry market
data of businesses similar to the reporting units and based upon management’s judgment. For the market approach, we used estimated EBITDA and revenue multiples based on industry market data.
PriorWe did not record a goodwill impairment charge at September 30, 2020, as all reporting units subjected to the adoptionquantitative test passed. At September 30, 2020, the estimated fair values of ASU 2017-04 in fiscal 2017,such reporting units exceeded their carrying values by at least 4% (the lowest of which was Foodservice, all others exceeded their carrying values by at least 13%). Variances between the impairment test required a two-step quantitative evaluation. Step oneactual performance of the evaluation involved comparingbusinesses and the assumptions that were used in developing the estimates of fair value could result
in impairment charges in future periods. Further, due to the low headroom in our Foodservice reporting unit, small changes in significant assumptions may have resulted in an impairment in the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill, consistent with as described above. Ifperiod. Factors that could create variances in the fair value of a reporting unit determined in step one of the evaluation was lower than its carrying value, we proceeded to step two, which compared the carrying value of goodwill to its implied fair value. In estimating the implied fair value of goodwill for a reporting unit, we assigned theestimated fair value of the reporting unit (as determinedunits include but are not limited to (i) fluctuations in the first step)forecasted sales volumes, which can be driven by external factors affecting demand such as changes in consumer preferences, including changes related to the assetsCOVID-19 pandemic, and liabilities associated withconsumer responses to marketing and pricing strategy, (ii) changes in product costs, including commodities, (iii) interest rate fluctuations and (iv) currency fluctuations.
For the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company recorded a charge of $48.7 million for the impairment of goodwill. The impairment charge related to the cheese reporting unit as ifwithin the Refrigerated Retail segment and was primarily related to lost distribution with customers and a shift in supplier and consumer preferences to private label cheese products and away from branded cheese products. At September 30, 2019, the estimated fair values of all other reporting unitunits exceeded their carrying values in all other cases by at least 11% (the lowest of which was Weetabix which had been acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the carryingbook value of goodwill of the reporting unit over its implied fair value was recorded as impairment.$850.7 million).
We did not record a goodwill impairment charge at September 30, 2018, as all reporting units passed the quantitative impairment test. At September 30, 2018, the estimated fair values of our reporting units exceeded their carrying values in all cases by at least 6% (the lowest of which was Weetabix after consideration of the impairment of the Weetabix trademark). As
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment - Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recorded whenever a decline in the value of an equity investment below its carrying amount is determined to be other than temporary. The Company determines whether a loss is other than temporary by considering the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the Weetabix reporting unit exceeded itsequity investment has been less than the carrying value by only 6%, variances betweenamount, the actual performancefinancial condition of the businessequity investment and the assumptions that were used in developingintent to retain the estimateinvestment for a period of fair value could result in impairment charges in future periods. Factors that could create variances in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit include but are not limitedtime is sufficient to (i) fluctuations in forecasted sales volumes, which can be driven by external factors affecting demand such as changes in consumer preferences and consumer responses to marketing and pricing strategy, (ii) changes in product costs, including commodities, (iii) interest rate fluctuations and (iv) currency fluctuations.
For the year ended September 30, 2017, we recorded a charge of $26.5 million for the impairment of goodwill. The impairment charge related to our Dymatize reporting unit, which is included in the Active Nutrition segment. In fiscal 2017, consistent with the prior year, the specialty sports nutrition category, in which Dymatize sold the majority of its products, continued to experience weak sales, which resulted in management lowering its long-term expectations for the Dymatize reporting unit. After conducting step one of the impairment analysis, it was determined that the carrying value of the Dymatize reporting unit exceeded its fair value by $76.6 million. As the application of ASU 2017-04 does not allow for step two of the analysis prescribed prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-04, we recorded an impairment charge of goodwill down to the fairany anticipated recovery in market value. At the time of the analysis, the Dymatize reporting unit had $26.5 million of remaining goodwill, and we therefore recorded an impairment charge for the entire goodwill balance of $26.5 million.
We did not record a goodwill impairment charge as of September 30, 2016. With the exception of Dymatize, all reporting units passed the first step of the impairment test. Dymatize failed step one and accordingly, we proceeded to perform step two of the analysis. Based on the results of step two, we determined that the fair value of the goodwill allocated to the Dymatize reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately $36.0 million and was therefore not impaired as of September 30, 2016.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Pension assets and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis and are affected by the estimated market-related value of plan assets, estimates of the expected return on plan assets, discount rates, future salary increases and other assumptions inherent in these valuations. We annually review the assumptions underlying the actuarial calculations and make changes to these assumptions, based on current market conditions and historical trends, as necessary. Differences between the actual returnreturns on plan assets and the expected returnreturns on plan assets and changes to projected future rates of return on plan assets will affect the amount of pension expense or income ultimately recognized. The other postretirement benefits liability (partially subsidized retiree health and life insurance) is also determined on an actuarial basis and is affected by assumptions including the discount raterates and expected trends in healthcare costs. Changes in the discount raterates and differences between actual and expected healthcare costs will affect the recorded amount of other postretirement benefits expense. For both pensions and other postretirement benefit calculations, the assumed discount rate isrates are determined by projecting the plans’ expected future benefit payments as defined for the projected benefit obligation or accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, discounting those expected payments using a theoretical zero-coupon spot yield curve derived from a universe of high-quality (rated AA or better by Moody’s Investor Service) corporate bonds as of the measurement date and solving for the single equivalent discount rate that results in the same present value. A 1% decrease in the assumed discount raterates (from 4.30%3.01% to 3.30%2.01% for U.S. pension; from 4.27%2.79% to 3.27%1.79% for U.S. other postretirement benefits; from 3.53%2.71% to 2.53%1.71% for Canadian pension; from 3.54%2.78% to 2.54%1.78% for Canadian other postretirement benefits and from 2.81%1.73% to 1.81%0.73% for other international pension) would have increased the recorded benefit obligations at September 30, 20182020 by approximately $165.6$212.0 million for pensions and approximately $8.2$10.7 million for other postretirement benefits. The expected return on plan assets was determined based on historical and expected future returns of the various asset classes, using the target allocations of the plans. A 1% decrease in the assumed return on plan assets (from 5.46%5.53% to 4.46%4.53% for U.S.; from 6.00%5.75% to 5.00%4.75% for Canadian and from 3.56%2.53% to 2.56%1.53% for other international) would have increased the net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans by approximately $9.7$11.0 million. We expect to contribute $5.5$0.2 million to the combined pension plans in fiscal 2019.2021. No contributions to our postretirement medical benefit plans are expected in fiscal 2019.2021. Contributions beyond fiscal 20192021 remain uncertain and will significantly depend on changes in actuarial assumptions, actual return on plan assets and any legislative or regulatory changes that may affect plan funding requirements.
See Note 1819 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for more information about pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions.
Gain on Sale of Business -In order to calculate the total recorded gain related to the 8th Avenue Transactions of $126.6 million during the year ended September 30, 2019, we were required to estimate the fair value of our equity method investment in 8th Avenue. In making this estimate, we used an approach combining the estimated implied value from the 8th Avenue Transactions, an income approach and a market approach, in which the greatest value was placed on the implied value from the 8th Avenue Transactions. In order to calculate the fair value implied by the 8th Avenue Transactions, we estimated the value of the 8th Avenue equity. In making this estimate, we used a lattice model, which required significant assumptions, including estimates for the term, credit spread, yield volatility and risk free rates associated with 8th Avenue’s preferred stock. The income approach was based on discounted future cash flows and required significant assumptions, including estimates
regarding future revenue, profitability and capital requirements. The market approach was based on a market multiple (revenue and EBITDA) and required an estimate of appropriate multiples based on the market data.
Income Tax - We estimate income tax expense based on taxes in each jurisdiction. We estimate current tax exposures together with temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We believe that sufficient income will be generated in the future to realize the benefit of most of our deferred tax assets. Where there is not sufficient evidence that such income is likely to be generated, we establish a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax assets. We are subject to periodic audits by governmental tax authorities of our income tax returns. These audits generally include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the amount and timing of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. We evaluate our exposures associated with our tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, and record reserves for estimated exposures.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted. The Tax Act resulted in significant impacts to our accounting for income taxes with the most significant of these impacts relating to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate, a one-time transition tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings and full expensing of certain qualified depreciable assets placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023. The Tax Act enacts a new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21% that will fully go into effect for our fiscal 2019 tax year and is prorated with the pre-December 22, 2017 U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 35% for our current tax year.
U.S. federal, U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions income tax returns for the tax years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are subject to examination by the tax authorities in each respective jurisdiction.
With respect to the Bob Evans acquisition, we assumed all income tax liabilities for those jurisdictions which remain subject to examination, primarily consisting of tax years ended April 2015 through the short tax year ended January 11, 2018, the date of acquisition. With respect to the fiscal 2017 acquisition of the Weetabix Group, we assumed substantially all income tax liabilities for those jurisdictions which remain subject to examination. We did not assume any pre-acquisition tax liabilities related to the fiscal 2016 acquisition of WEF. With respect to the NPE acquisition made in fiscal 2017 and acquisitions made in 2015, the seller generally retained responsibility for all income tax liabilities through the date of acquisition. With respect to the Michael Foods acquisition, we assumed all income tax liabilities for those certain jurisdictions which remain subject to examination, consisting primarily of the short tax year ended June 2, 2014, the date of acquisition.
See Note 9 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for more information about estimates affecting income taxes.
RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 3 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for a discussion regarding recently issued and adopted accounting standards.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant volatility and uncertainty in the markets in which the Company operates. At the time of this filing, the Company is unable to predict or determine the impacts that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on its exposure to market risk from commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, among others. For additional discussion, refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7 of this report, “Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements” on page 1 of this report and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report.
Commodity Price Risk
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to commodity price risks relating to the acquisitionpurchases of raw materials, energy and fuels.fuel and supplies. The Company may use futures contracts and options to manage certain of these exposures when it is practical to do so. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the market price of the Company’s principal hedged commodities, including natural gas, heating oil, soybean oil, corn, wheat and wheat,dairy, would have decreased the fair value of the Company’s commodity-related derivatives portfolio by approximately $10 approximately $11 million and $8 million as of both September 30, 20182020 and 2017.2019, respectively. This volatility analysis ignores changes in the exposures inherent in the underlying hedged transactions. Because the Company does not hold or trade derivatives for speculation or profit, all changes in derivative values are effectively offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures.
For more information regarding the Company’s commodity derivative contracts, refer to Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Foreign Currency Risk
Related to its foreign subsidiaries, the Company is exposed to risks of fluctuations in future cash flows and earnings due to changes in exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, the Company uses a combination of foreign exchange contracts, which may consist of options, forward contracts and currency swaps. As of September 30, 2018,2020, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the expected EURO-USDEuro-GBP and USD-GBP exchange rates would have reduced the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency related derivatives portfolio by an immaterial amount and approximately $3 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the expected GBP-USD exchange rates would have reduced the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency related derivatives portfolio by approximately $1 million and $79 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the expected EURO-USD exchange rates
and a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the expected GBP-USD exchange rates would have reduced the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency related derivatives portfolio by approximately $2 million and $65 million, respectively.$51 million.
For additional information regarding the Company’s foreign currency derivative contracts, refer to Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Interest Rate Risk
Long-term debt
As of September 30, 2018,2020, the Company has principal value of indebtedness of $7,917.4$7,049.7 million including amounts classified as held for sale, related to its senior notes, term loan, bridge loana municipal bond, BellRing’s Term B Facility and capital lease.BellRing’s Revolving Credit Facility. At September 30, 2020, Post’s Revolving Credit Facility and BellRing’s Revolving Credit Facility had available borrowing capacity of $731.2 million and $170.0 million, respectively. Of the total $7,917.4$7,049.7 million outstanding indebtedness, $5,119.9$6,337.5 million bears interest at a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.5%5.2%. As of September 30, 2017,2019, the Company had principal value of indebtedness of $7,212.2
$7,119.3 million related to its senior notes, term loan and capital lease. Of the total $7,212.2$7,119.3 million outstanding indebtedness, $5,017.7$5,809.8 million accrued interest at a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.5%.
As of September 30, 20182020 and September 30, 2017,2019, the fair value of the Company’s total debt including debt classified as held for sale, was $7,790.9$7,277.8 million and $7,343.4$7,412.0 million, respectively. Changes in interest rates impact fixed and variable rate debt differently. For fixed rate debt, a change in interest rates will only impact the fair value of the debt, whereas a change in the interest rates on variable rate debt will impact interest expense and cash flows. A hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates would have increased the fair value of the fixed rate debt by approximately $97$14 million and $72$30 million as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. Including the impact of interest rate swaps, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would have increased both interest expense and interest paid on variable rate debt by an immaterial amount during the year ended September 30, 2020 and by approximately $2$3 million during the year ended September 30, 2018 and by less than $1 million during the year ended September 30, 2017.2019.
For additional information regarding the Company’s debt, refer to Note 1617 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Interest rate swaps
As of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the Company had interest rate swaps with a notional value of $2,723.9$2,721.0 million and $2,725.4$1,804.1 million, respectively. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates would have decreased the fair value of the interest rate swaps by $66$19 million and $55$36 million as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
For additional information regarding the Company’s interest rate swap contracts, refer to Note 14 within “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
| | | | |
| Audited Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20182020 and 20172019 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 | |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Tothe Board of Directors and Shareholders of Post Holdings, Inc.:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Post Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2018,2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 20182020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in fiscal 2020.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded certain elements of the internal control over financial reporting of Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Bob Evans”) from its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination in the period ended September 30, 2018. Subsequent to the acquisition, certain elements of Bob Evans internal control over financial reporting and related processes were integrated into the Company’s existing systems and internal control over financial reporting. Those controls that were not integrated have been excluded from management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018. We have also excluded these elements of the internal control over financial reporting of Bob Evans from our audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The excluded elements represent controls over approximately 2% or $292.9 million of consolidated assets and 5% or $315.7 million of consolidated revenues of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2018.
Definitionand Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment– Foodservice Reporting Unit
As described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill balance was $4,438.6 million and the goodwill associated with the Foodservice Reporting Unit was $1,335.6 million as of September 30, 2020. Management conducts a goodwill impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year following the annual forecasting process, or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. As disclosed by management, the goodwill impairment assessment requires an entity to compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was determined using a combined income and market approach with a greater weighting on the income approach. The income approach is based on discounted future cash flows and requires significant assumptions, including estimates regarding future revenue, profitability, capital requirements and the discount rate. The market approach is based on a market multiple (revenue and earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, “EBITDA”) and requires an estimate of multiples based on market data.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment of the Foodservice reporting unit is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when determining the fair value measurement of the reporting unit, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to future revenue, future profitability, the discount rate, the revenue market multiple and the EBITDA market multiple, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the valuation of the Foodservice reporting unit. These procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for determining the fair value estimate of the reporting unit, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the approaches used for estimating fair value, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the approaches, and (iv) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management related to future revenue, future profitability, the discount rate, the revenue market multiple and the EBITDA market multiple. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to future revenue and future profitability involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the reporting unit, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s income approach and market approach, the discount rate, the revenue market multiple and the EBITDA market multiple.
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
November 16, 201820, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011.
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net Sales | $ | 6,257.2 |
| | $ | 5,225.8 |
| | $ | 5,026.8 |
| Net Sales | $ | 5,698.7 | | | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 6,257.2 | |
| Cost of goods sold | 4,390.4 |
| | 3,651.7 |
| | 3,479.4 |
| Cost of goods sold | 3,911.3 | | | 3,889.0 | | | 4,403.2 | |
| Gross Profit | 1,866.8 |
| | 1,574.1 |
| | 1,547.4 |
| Gross Profit | 1,787.4 | | | 1,792.1 | | | 1,854.0 | |
| | Selling, general and administrative expenses | 975.2 |
| | 867.4 |
| | 839.7 |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 934.3 | | | 911.6 | | | 976.4 | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 177.4 |
| | 159.1 |
| | 152.6 |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 160.3 | | | 161.3 | | | 177.4 | |
| Gain on sale of business | | Gain on sale of business | 0 | | | (126.6) | | | 0 | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 124.9 |
| | 26.5 |
| | — |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 0 | | | 63.3 | | | 124.9 | |
| Other operating expenses, net | 1.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 9.4 |
| |
| Other operating (income) expenses, net | | Other operating (income) expenses, net | (7.7) | | | 1.5 | | | 1.8 | |
| Operating Profit | 587.5 |
| | 520.3 |
| | 545.7 |
| Operating Profit | 700.5 | | | 781.0 | | | 573.5 | |
| | Interest expense, net | 387.3 |
| | 314.8 |
| | 306.5 |
| Interest expense, net | 388.6 | | | 322.4 | | | 387.3 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 31.1 |
| | 222.9 |
| | 86.4 |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 72.9 | | | 6.1 | | | 31.1 | |
| (Income) expense on swaps, net | (95.6 | ) | | (91.8 | ) | | 182.9 |
| |
| Earnings (Loss) before Income Taxes and Equity Method Loss | 264.7 |
| | 74.4 |
| | (30.1 | ) | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (204.0 | ) | | 26.1 |
| | (26.8 | ) | |
| Expense (income) on swaps, net | | Expense (income) on swaps, net | 187.1 | | | 306.6 | | | (95.6) | |
| Other income, net | | Other income, net | (11.5) | | | (13.2) | | | (14.0) | |
| Earnings before Income Taxes and Equity Method Loss | | Earnings before Income Taxes and Equity Method Loss | 63.4 | | | 159.1 | | | 264.7 | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | Income tax expense (benefit) | 3.5 | | | (3.9) | | | (204.0) | |
| Equity method loss, net of tax | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Equity method loss, net of tax | 30.9 | | | 37.0 | | | 0.3 | |
| Net Earnings (Loss) Including Noncontrolling Interest | 468.4 |
| | 48.3 |
| | (3.3 | ) | |
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Net Earnings (Loss) | 467.3 |
| | 48.3 |
| | (3.3 | ) | |
| Preferred stock dividends | (10.0 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | (25.1 | ) | |
| Net Earnings (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders | $ | 457.3 |
| | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | (28.4 | ) | |
| Net Earnings Including Noncontrolling Interests | | Net Earnings Including Noncontrolling Interests | 29.0 | | | 126.0 | | | 468.4 | |
| Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | | Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28.2 | | | 1.3 | | | 1.1 | |
| Net Earnings | | Net Earnings | 0.8 | | | 124.7 | | | 467.3 | |
| Less: Preferred stock dividends | | Less: Preferred stock dividends | 0 | | | 3.0 | | | 10.0 | |
| Net Earnings Available to Common Shareholders | | Net Earnings Available to Common Shareholders | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 121.7 | | | $ | 457.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings (Loss) per share: | | | | | | |
| Earnings per Common Share: | | Earnings per Common Share: | |
| Basic | $ | 6.87 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | (0.41 | ) | Basic | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 1.72 | | | $ | 6.87 | |
| Diluted | $ | 6.16 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | (0.41 | ) | Diluted | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 1.66 | | | $ | 6.16 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding: | | | | | | Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding: | |
| Basic | 66.6 |
| | 67.8 |
| | 68.8 |
| Basic | 68.9 | | | 70.8 | | | 66.6 | |
| Diluted | 75.9 |
| | 69.9 |
| | 68.8 |
| Diluted | 70.1 | | | 75.1 | | | 75.9 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net Earnings Including Noncontrolling Interest | $ | 29.0 | | | $ | 126.0 | | | $ | 468.4 | |
| Pension and postretirement benefits adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized pension and postretirement benefit obligations | (36.8) | | | (12.5) | | | 5.0 | |
| Reclassifications to net earnings | (2.2) | | | (3.1) | | | (3.2) | |
| | | | | |
| Hedging adjustments: | | | | | |
| Net gain on derivatives | 22.5 | | | 40.5 | | | 72.2 | |
| Reclassifications to net earnings | 8.2 | | | (31.0) | | | (3.6) | |
| Other reclassifications | 0 | | | 0 | | | (0.5) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments | 72.3 | | | (95.3) | | | (50.7) | |
| Reclassifications to net earnings (see Note 6) | 0 | | | 42.1 | | | 0 | |
| Tax benefit (expense) on other comprehensive income: | | | | | |
| Pension and postretirement benefits adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized pension and postretirement benefit obligations | 7.5 | | | 3.4 | | | (0.8) | |
| Reclassification to net earnings | 0.6 | | | 0.9 | | | 0.8 | |
| Adoption of accounting standards updates | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1.0 | |
| Hedging adjustments: | | | | | |
| Net gain on derivatives | (5.4) | | | (10.1) | | | (18.1) | |
| Reclassification to net earnings | (1.9) | | | 7.7 | | | 0.9 | |
| Adoption of accounting standards updates | 0 | | | 0 | | | (2.4) | |
| Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Including Noncontrolling Interests | $ | 64.8 | | | $ | (57.4) | | | $ | 0.6 | |
| Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 25.5 | | | 1.3 | | | 1.1 | |
| Total Comprehensive Income | $ | 68.3 | | | $ | 67.3 | | | $ | 467.9 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net Earnings (Loss) Including Noncontrolling Interest | $ | 468.4 |
| | $ | 48.3 |
| | $ | (3.3 | ) |
| Pension and postretirement benefits adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized pension and postretirement benefit obligations | 5.0 |
| | 47.8 |
| | 6.2 |
|
| Reclassifications to net earnings (loss) | (3.2 | ) | | (2.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on plan amendment (see Note 18) | — |
| | — |
| | 35.6 |
|
| Hedging adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized net gain (loss) on derivatives | 72.2 |
| | (18.8 | ) | | — |
|
| Reclassifications to net earnings (loss) | (3.6 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | — |
|
| Other reclassifications (see Note 14) | (0.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments | (51.3 | ) | | (5.7 | ) | | 5.5 |
|
| Reclassifications to net earnings (loss) (see Note 4) | — |
| | — |
| | (1.3 | ) |
| Tax benefit (expense) on other comprehensive income: | | | | | |
| Pension and postretirement benefits | 1.0 |
| | (8.3 | ) | | (16.5 | ) |
| Hedging | (19.6 | ) | | 7.0 |
| | — |
|
| Total Other Comprehensive Income | $ | — |
| | $ | 20.4 |
| | $ | 28.7 |
|
| Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 1.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total Comprehensive Income | $ | 466.7 |
| | $ | 68.7 |
| | $ | 25.4 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except par value)
| | | | September 30, | | September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
ASSETS | | Current Assets | | | | Current Assets | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 989.7 |
| | $ | 1,525.9 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,187.9 | | | $ | 1,050.7 | |
| Restricted cash | 4.8 |
| | 4.2 |
| Restricted cash | 5.5 | | | 3.8 | |
| Receivables, net | 462.3 |
| | 480.6 |
| Receivables, net | 441.6 | | | 445.1 | |
| Inventories | 484.2 |
| | 573.5 |
| Inventories | 599.4 | | | 579.8 | |
| Current assets held for sale | 195.0 |
| | — |
| |
| | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 64.3 |
| | 31.7 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 53.4 | | | 46.9 | |
| Total Current Assets | 2,200.3 |
| | 2,615.9 |
| Total Current Assets | 2,287.8 | | | 2,126.3 | |
| Property, net | 1,709.7 |
| | 1,690.7 |
| Property, net | 1,779.7 | | | 1,736.0 | |
| Goodwill | 4,499.6 |
| | 4,032.0 |
| Goodwill | 4,438.6 | | | 4,399.8 | |
| Other intangible assets, net | 3,539.3 |
| | 3,353.9 |
| Other intangible assets, net | 3,197.5 | | | 3,338.5 | |
| Other assets held for sale | 856.6 |
| | — |
| |
| | Equity method investments | | Equity method investments | 114.1 | | | 145.5 | |
| | Other assets | 252.0 |
| | 184.3 |
| Other assets | 329.0 | | | 205.5 | |
| Total Assets | $ | 13,057.5 |
| | $ | 11,876.8 |
| Total Assets | $ | 12,146.7 | | | $ | 11,951.6 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | Current Liabilities | | | | Current Liabilities | |
| Current portion of long-term debt | $ | 22.1 |
| | $ | 22.1 |
| Current portion of long-term debt | $ | 64.9 | | | $ | 13.5 | |
| Accounts payable | 365.1 |
| | 336.0 |
| Accounts payable | 367.9 | | | 395.6 | |
| Current liabilities held for sale | 65.6 |
| | — |
| |
| | Other current liabilities | 339.3 |
| | 346.3 |
| Other current liabilities | 541.6 | | | 393.8 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 792.1 |
| | 704.4 |
| Total Current Liabilities | 974.4 | | | 802.9 | |
| Long-term debt | 7,232.1 |
| | 7,149.1 |
| Long-term debt | 6,959.0 | | | 7,066.0 | |
| Deferred income taxes | 778.4 |
| | 905.8 |
| Deferred income taxes | 784.5 | | | 688.5 | |
| Other liabilities held for sale | 695.1 |
| | — |
| |
| | Other liabilities | 499.3 |
| | 327.8 |
| Other liabilities | 599.8 | | | 456.9 | |
| Total Liabilities | 9,997.0 |
| | 9,087.1 |
| Total Liabilities | 9,317.7 | | | 9,014.3 | |
| | | | | |
| Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 17) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 18) | | Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 18) | |
| | | | | |
| Shareholders’ Equity | | | | Shareholders’ Equity | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50.0 shares authorized | | | | |
| 3.75% Series B, zero and 1.5 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | — |
| | — |
| |
| 2.50% Series C, 3.2 shares issued and outstanding in each year | |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300.0 shares authorized, 66.7 and 66.1 shares outstanding, respectively | 0.8 |
| | 0.7 |
| |
| | Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50.0 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding in each year | | Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50.0 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding in each year | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300.0 shares authorized, 66.4 and 72.1 shares outstanding, respectively | | Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300.0 shares authorized, 66.4 and 72.1 shares outstanding, respectively | 0.8 | | | 0.8 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 3,590.9 |
| | 3,566.5 |
| Additional paid-in capital | 4,182.9 | | | 3,734.8 | |
| Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | 88.0 |
| | (376.0 | ) | |
| Retained earnings | | Retained earnings | 208.6 | | | 207.8 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (39.4 | ) | | (40.0 | ) | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (29.3) | | | (96.8) | |
| Treasury stock, at cost, 8.6 and 5.8 shares, respectively | (589.9 | ) | | (371.2 | ) | |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity Excluding Noncontrolling Interest | 3,050.4 |
| | 2,780.0 |
| |
| Noncontrolling interest | 10.1 |
| | 9.7 |
| |
| Treasury stock, at cost, 18.0 and 11.9 shares, respectively | | Treasury stock, at cost, 18.0 and 11.9 shares, respectively | (1,508.5) | | | (920.7) | |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity Excluding Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Shareholders’ Equity Excluding Noncontrolling Interests | 2,854.5 | | | 2,925.9 | |
| Noncontrolling interests | | Noncontrolling interests | (25.5) | | | 11.4 | |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity | 3,060.5 |
| | 2,789.7 |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity | 2,829.0 | | | 2,937.3 | |
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 13,057.5 |
| | $ | 11,876.8 |
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 12,146.7 | | | $ | 11,951.6 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
| | | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | | |
| Net earnings including noncontrolling interests | | Net earnings including noncontrolling interests | $ | 29.0 | | | $ | 126.0 | | | $ | 468.4 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities: | | Adjustments to reconcile net earnings including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | Depreciation and amortization | 370.3 | | | 379.6 | | | 398.4 | |
| | Gain on sale of business | | Gain on sale of business | 0 | | | (126.6) | | | 0 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | | Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 72.9 | | | 6.1 | | | 31.1 | |
| | Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | | Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 0 | | | 63.3 | | | 124.9 | |
| Unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate swaps and foreign exchange contracts, net | | Unrealized loss (gain) on interest rate swaps and foreign exchange contracts, net | 125.5 | | | 293.1 | | | (96.7) | |
| | Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | | Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | 49.7 | | | 38.9 | | | 30.9 | |
| Equity method loss, net of tax | | Equity method loss, net of tax | 30.9 | | | 37.0 | | | 0.3 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | Deferred income taxes | (43.6) | | | (80.3) | | | (256.5) | |
| Other, net | | Other, net | 1.4 | | | 8.7 | | | 9.2 | |
| Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions and held for sale assets and liabilities: | | Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions and held for sale assets and liabilities: | |
| Decrease (increase) in receivables | | Decrease (increase) in receivables | 20.3 | | | 19.3 | | | (6.0) | |
| (Increase) decrease in inventories | | (Increase) decrease in inventories | (4.6) | | | (97.9) | | | 3.6 | |
| (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets | | (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets | (27.3) | | | 20.7 | | | 7.2 | |
| Decrease (increase) in other assets | | Decrease (increase) in other assets | 5.0 | | | 0.2 | | | (24.0) | |
| (Decrease) increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities | | (Decrease) increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities | (26.8) | | | 4.4 | | | 29.4 | |
| Increase (decrease) in non-current liabilities | | Increase (decrease) in non-current liabilities | 22.9 | | | (4.5) | | | (1.6) | |
| Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 625.6 | | | 688.0 | | | 718.6 | |
| Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | | | | |
| Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (19.9) | | | 0 | | | (1,454.4) | |
| Additions to property | | Additions to property | (234.6) | | | (273.9) | | | (225.0) | |
| | Proceeds from sale of businesses | | Proceeds from sale of businesses | 0 | | | 266.8 | | | 0 | |
| | Cross-currency swap cash settlements | | Cross-currency swap cash settlements | 52.7 | | | 31.7 | | | 4.8 | |
| Purchases of equity securities | | Purchases of equity securities | (29.2) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Insurance proceeds on property losses | | Insurance proceeds on property losses | 10.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Other, net | | Other, net | 2.5 | | | 2.1 | | | (1.0) | |
| Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities | | Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities | (218.5) | | | 26.7 | | | (1,675.6) | |
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 4,258.2 | | | 750.0 | | | 1,625.0 | |
| | | | Year Ended September 30, | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | | | |
| Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interest | $ | 468.4 |
| | $ | 48.3 |
| | $ | (3.3 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interest to net cash flow provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 398.4 |
| | 323.1 |
| | 302.8 |
| |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 31.1 |
| | 222.9 |
| | 86.4 |
| |
| Loss (gain) on foreign currency | 0.7 |
| | (30.8 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 124.9 |
| | 26.5 |
| | — |
| |
| Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps, net | (96.7 | ) | | (93.6 | ) | | 182.4 |
| |
| Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | 30.9 |
| | 23.6 |
| | 17.2 |
| |
| Deferred income taxes | (256.5 | ) | | 17.4 |
| | (74.6 | ) | |
| Other, net | 8.8 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 12.9 |
| |
| Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions and held for sale assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Increase in receivables | (6.0 | ) | | (45.9 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | |
| Decrease (increase) in inventories | 3.6 |
| | (2.5 | ) | | (37.2 | ) | |
| Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets | 7.9 |
| | 3.7 |
| | (3.5 | ) | |
| Increase in other assets | (24.0 | ) | | (8.7 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | |
| Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities | 29.4 |
| | (109.0 | ) | | 18.8 |
| |
| (Decrease) increase in non-current liabilities | (1.6 | ) | | 5.0 |
| | 7.5 |
| |
| Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 719.3 |
| | 386.7 |
| | 502.4 |
| |
| Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | | | | | |
| Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (1,454.4 | ) | | (1,915.2 | ) | | (94.4 | ) | |
| Additions to property | (225.0 | ) | | (190.4 | ) | | (121.5 | ) | |
| Restricted cash | (1.3 | ) | | 4.2 |
| | 10.4 |
| |
| Proceeds from sale of property and assets held for sale | 0.2 |
| | 10.6 |
| | 2.1 |
| |
| Proceeds from sale of businesses | — |
| | — |
| | 7.3 |
| |
| Other, net | 3.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (1,676.9 | ) | | (2,090.8 | ) | | (196.1 | ) | |
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 1,625.0 |
| | 4,700.0 |
| | 1,750.0 |
| |
| Repayments of long-term debt | (912.1 | ) | | (2,088.4 | ) | | (1,632.2 | ) | Repayments of long-term debt | (4,349.1) | | | (919.1) | | | (912.1) | |
| Payments to appraisal rights holders | | Payments to appraisal rights holders | (3.8) | | | (253.6) | | | 0 | |
| Purchases of treasury stock | (218.7 | ) | | (317.8 | ) | | — |
| Purchases of treasury stock | (589.1) | | | (322.1) | | | (218.7) | |
| Payments of preferred stock dividends | (10.8 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | (14.4 | ) | Payments of preferred stock dividends | 0 | | | (4.0) | | | (10.8) | |
| Proceeds from initial public offering | | Proceeds from initial public offering | 524.4 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Premium from issuance of long-term debt | — |
| | 41.2 |
| | — |
| Premium from issuance of long-term debt | 22.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Preferred stock conversion | — |
| | — |
| | (10.9 | ) | |
| Payments of debt issuance costs and deferred financing fees | (24.9 | ) | | (59.0 | ) | | (24.3 | ) | |
| | Payments of debt issuance costs, financing fees and modification costs | | Payments of debt issuance costs, financing fees and modification costs | (45.3) | | | (16.3) | | | (24.9) | |
| Refund of debt issuance costs | | Refund of debt issuance costs | 15.3 | | | 7.8 | | | 0 | |
| Payments of debt extinguishment costs | (33.7 | ) | | (219.8 | ) | | (88.0 | ) | Payments of debt extinguishment costs | (49.8) | | | 0 | | | (33.7) | |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock awards | 5.7 |
| | 13.4 |
| | 6.6 |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock awards | 3.9 | | | 112.6 | | | 5.7 | |
| Net cash received from stock repurchase contracts | — |
| | — |
| | 1.1 |
| |
| Cash paid for share repurchase contracts | | Cash paid for share repurchase contracts | (46.4) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Distribution to noncontrolling interest | (1.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Distribution to noncontrolling interest | 0 | | | 0 | | | (1.4) | |
| Other, net | (5.7 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | | 7.6 |
| Other, net | (12.3) | | | (7.7) | | | (5.7) | |
| Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | 423.4 |
| | 2,053.1 |
| | (4.5 | ) | |
| Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents | (2.0 | ) | | 33.3 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (536.2 | ) | | 382.3 |
| | 302.2 |
| |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year | 1,525.9 |
| | 1,143.6 |
| | 841.4 |
| |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year | $ | 989.7 |
| | $ | 1,525.9 |
| | $ | 1,143.6 |
| |
| Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities | | Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities | (272.0) | | | (652.4) | | | 423.4 | |
| Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash | | Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash | 3.8 | | | (2.3) | | | (2.0) | |
| Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash | | Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash | 138.9 | | | 60.0 | | | (535.6) | |
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Year | | Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Year | 1,054.5 | | | 994.5 | | | 1,530.1 | |
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, End of Year | | Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, End of Year | $ | 1,193.4 | | | $ | 1,054.5 | | | $ | 994.5 | |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in millions)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Post Holdings, Inc. Shareholders’ | | | | |
| Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Retirement Benefit Adjustments, net of tax | | Hedging Adjustments, net of tax | | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | | Treasury Stock | | Non-Controlling Interests | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
| Balance, September 30, 2017 | 4.7 | | | $ | 0 | | | 66.1 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 3,566.5 | | | $ | (376.0) | | | $ | 35.1 | | | $ | (11.1) | | | $ | (64.0) | | | $ | (371.2) | | | $ | 9.7 | | | $ | 2,789.7 | |
| Net earnings | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 467.3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 467.3 | |
| Adoption of accounting standards updates | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1.4 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1.4 | |
| Preferred stock dividends declared | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (6.8) | | | (4.0) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (10.8) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock conversion | (1.5) | | | — | | | 3.1 | | | 0.1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 0.1 | |
| Activity under stock and deferred compensation plans | 0 | | | — | | | 0.3 | | | — | | | 0.3 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 0.3 | |
| Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 30.9 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 30.9 | |
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | | | — | | | (2.8) | | | — | | | 0 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (218.7) | | | — | | | (218.7) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1.1 | | | 1.1 | |
| Distribution to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (0.7) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (0.7) | | | (1.4) | |
| Net change in retirement benefits, net of tax | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2.8 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2.8 | |
| Net change in hedges, net of tax | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 48.5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 48.5 | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (50.7) | | | — | | | — | | | (50.7) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | 3.2 | | | $ | 0 | | | 66.7 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 3,590.9 | | | $ | 88.0 | | | $ | 37.9 | | | $ | 37.4 | | | $ | (114.7) | | | $ | (589.9) | | | $ | 10.1 | | | $ | 3,060.5 | |
| Net earnings | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 124.7 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 124.7 | |
| Adoption of accounting standards updates | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (0.9) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (0.9) | |
| Preferred stock dividends declared | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 0 | | | (4.0) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (4.0) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock conversion | (3.2) | | | 0 | | | 5.9 | | | 0 | | | (0.1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (0.1) | |
| Activity under stock and deferred compensation plans | 0 | | | — | | | 2.8 | | | — | | | 105.1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 105.1 | |
| Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 38.9 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 38.9 | |
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | | | — | | | (3.3) | | | — | | | 0 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (330.8) | | | — | | | (330.8) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Post Holdings, Inc. Shareholders’ | | | | |
| | Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) | | Retirement Benefit Adjustments, net of tax | | Hedging Adjustments, net of tax | | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | | Treasury Stock | | Non-Controlling Interest | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
| Balance, September 30, 2015 | 5.6 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | 62.1 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 3,538.8 |
| | $ | (421.0 | ) | | $ | (26.6 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (62.5 | ) | | $ | (53.4 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,976.0 |
|
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3.3 | ) |
| Preferred stock dividends declared | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14.4 | ) |
| Preferred stock conversion | (0.9 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | 2.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (10.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10.9 | ) |
| Activity under stock and deferred compensation plans | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 14.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14.2 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17.2 |
|
| Net cash received from stock repurchase contracts | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Tangible equity units conversion | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net change in retirement benefits, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 24.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 24.5 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.2 |
|
| Balance, September 30, 2016 | 4.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | 64.9 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 3,546.0 |
| | $ | (424.3 | ) | | $ | (2.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (58.3 | ) | | $ | (53.4 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,008.6 |
|
| Net earnings | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48.3 |
|
| Preferred stock dividends declared | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (13.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (13.5 | ) |
| Activity under stock and deferred compensation plans | — |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
| | — |
| | 10.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10.4 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23.6 |
|
| Purchases of treasury stock | — |
| | — |
| | (4.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (317.8 | ) | | — |
| | (317.8 | ) |
| Noncontrolling interest in acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9.7 |
| | 9.7 |
|
| Tangible equity units conversion | — |
| | — |
| | 4.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net change in retirement benefits, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 37.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 37.2 |
|
| Net change in hedges, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.1 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5.7 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2017 | 4.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | 66.1 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 3,566.5 |
| | $ | (376.0 | ) | | $ | 35.1 |
| | $ | (11.1 | ) | | $ | (64.0 | ) | | $ | (371.2 | ) | | $ | 9.7 |
| | $ | 2,789.7 |
|
| Net earnings | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 467.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 467.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1.3 | | | 1.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net change in retirement benefits, net of tax | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (11.3) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (11.3) | |
| Net change in hedges, net of tax | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7.1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7.1 | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (53.2) | | | — | | | — | | | (53.2) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2019 | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | 72.1 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 3,734.8 | | | $ | 207.8 | | | $ | 26.6 | | | $ | 44.5 | | | $ | (167.9) | | | $ | (920.7) | | | $ | 11.4 | | | $ | 2,937.3 | |
| Net earnings | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 0.8 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 0.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Activity under stock and deferred compensation plans | 0 | | | — | | | 0.4 | | | — | | | (8.3) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 0.1 | | | (8.2) | |
| Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 47.2 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2.5 | | | 49.7 | |
| Purchases of treasury stock | 0 | | | — | | | (6.1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (587.8) | | | — | | | (587.8) | |
| Initial public offering | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 455.6 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (65.0) | | | 390.6 | |
| Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 28.2 | | | 28.2 | |
| Cash paid for share repurchase contracts | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (46.4) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (46.4) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net change in retirement benefits, net of tax | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (30.9) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (30.9) | |
| Net change in hedges, net of tax | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 25.8 | | | — | | | — | | | (2.4) | | | 23.4 | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 72.6 | | | — | | | (0.3) | | | 72.3 | |
| Balance, September 30, 2020 | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | 66.4 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 4,182.9 | | | $ | 208.6 | | | $ | (4.3) | | | $ | 70.3 | | | $ | (95.3) | | | $ | (1,508.5) | | | $ | (25.5) | | | $ | 2,829.0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adoption of accounting standards update 2018-02 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.4 |
|
| Preferred stock dividends declared | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6.8 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10.8 | ) |
| Preferred stock conversion | (1.5 | ) | | — |
| | 3.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Activity under stock and deferred compensation plans | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30.9 |
|
| Purchases of treasury stock | — |
| | — |
| | (2.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (218.7 | ) | | — |
| | (218.7 | ) |
| Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.1 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Distribution to noncontrolling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.7 | ) | | (1.4 | ) |
| Net change in retirement benefits, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.8 |
|
| Net change in hedges, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48.5 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (50.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (50.7 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | 3.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | 66.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 3,590.9 |
| | $ | 88.0 |
| | $ | 37.9 |
| | $ | 37.4 |
| | $ | (114.7 | ) | | $ | (589.9 | ) | | $ | 10.1 |
| | $ | 3,060.5 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
POST HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions, except per share datainformation or where indicated otherwise)
NOTE 1 — BACKGROUND
Post Holdings, Inc. (“Post” or the “Company”) is a consumer packaged goods holding company operating in the center-of-the-store, refrigerated, foodservice, food ingredient activeand convenient nutrition andfood categories. The Company also participates in the private brand food categories.category, including through its investment with third parties in 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”). The Company’s products are sold through a variety of channels, such asincluding grocery, club and drug stores, mass merchandisers, foodservice, food ingredient and e-commerce.eCommerce. As of September 30, 2018,2020, Post operates in five reportable segments: Post Consumer Brands, Weetabix, Foodservice, Refrigerated Food, Active NutritionRetail and PrivateBellRing Brands. The Post Consumer Brands segment includes the North American ready-to-eat (“RTE”) cereal business; the Weetabix segment includes primarily the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) RTE cereal and branded muesli business sold and distributed primarily outside of North America;business; the Refrigerated FoodFoodservice segment includes refrigerated foodservice, primarily egg and potato and refrigerated retail, inclusive ofproducts; the Refrigerated Retail segment includes side dishes and egg, cheese and sausage;sausage products; and the BellRing Brands segment includes ready-to-drink (“RTD”) protein shakes and other RTD beverages, powders and nutrition bars.
On October 21, 2019, BellRing Brands, Inc. (“BellRing”), a subsidiary of the Company, closed its initial public offering (the “IPO”) of 39.4 shares of its Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class A Common Stock”). The IPO was completed at an offering price of $14.00 per share and BellRing received net proceeds from the IPO of $524.4, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. As a result of the IPO and certain other transactions completed in connection with the IPO (the “formation transactions”), BellRing is a publicly-traded company whose Class A Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “BRBR”. BellRing is a holding company of BellRing Brands, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“BellRing LLC”), owning 28.8% of its non-voting membership units (the “BellRing LLC units”). Post owns 71.2% of the BellRing LLC units and one share of BellRing’s Class B common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class B Common Stock” and, collectively with the Class A Common Stock, the “BellRing Common Stock”). The Class B Common Stock has voting rights but no rights to dividends or other economic rights. For so long as Post or its affiliates (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) directly own more than 50% of the BellRing LLC units, the Class B Common Stock represents 67% of the combined voting power of the BellRing Common Stock. BellRing LLC is the holding company for Post’s historical active nutrition business, reported herein as the BellRing Brands segment and reported historically as the Active Nutrition segment includes protein shakes, barssegment. In connection with the IPO, the Company incurred transaction-related expenses of $2.5 and powders$6.7 during the years ended September 30, 2020 and nutritional supplements;2019, respectively. These expenses generally included third party costs for due diligence, advisory services and government filing fees and were recorded as “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the PrivateConsolidated Statements of Operations. The Company did not incur transaction-related expenses in connection with the IPO during the year ended September 30, 2018.
Effective October 21, 2019, the financial results of BellRing and its subsidiaries were consolidated within Post’s financial results and 28.8% of the consolidated net income and net assets of BellRing and its subsidiaries, representing the percentage of economic interest in BellRing LLC held by BellRing (and therefore indirectly held by the public stockholders of BellRing through their ownership of the Class A Common Stock), is allocated to noncontrolling interest (“NCI”) (see Note 8). The term “BellRing” as used herein generally refers to BellRing Brands, segment includes peanut and other nut butters, dried fruit and nut products, granola and pasta.Inc.; however, in discussions related to debt facilities, the term “BellRing” refers to BellRing Brands, LLC.
Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”), dated as of August 2,On October 1, 2018, among Post, 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. (“8th Avenue”), and THL Equity Fund VIII Investors (PB), LLC, an affiliate of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P.,was separately capitalized by Post and affiliatesthird parties through a series of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (collectively, “THL”) separately capitalized 8th Avenuetransactions (the “8th Avenue Transactions”). Upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions,, and 8th Avenue became the holding company for Post’s historical private brands business, reported herein as Post’s Private Brands segment, andbusiness. Post received totalgross proceeds of $875.0, retainingas well as $16.8 related to final working capital adjustments, from the 8th Avenue Transactions, and the Company retained shares of common stock equal to 60.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue. Upon completion of theEffective October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue Transactions, 8th Avenue iswas no longer consolidated in the Company's financial statements and the 60.5% retained interest in 8th Avenue is accounted for using the equity method. At September 30, 2018, the assets and liabilities of the8th Avenue is reported historically herein as Post’s Private Brands segment were classified as held for sale.segment. For additional information, see Notes 4, 6, 8 and 16.17.
Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, all references in these financial statements and notes to “Post,” “the Company,” “us,” “our” or “we” mean Post Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated and non-consolidated subsidiaries. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2018fiscal 2020 presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on Net Earnings (Loss) or Shareholders’ Equity, as previously reported.
NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the operations of Post and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates and Allocations — The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which require certain elections as to accounting policy, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amount of net revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant accounting policy elections, estimates and assumptions include, among others, pension and benefit plan assumptions, valuation assumptions of goodwill and other intangible assets, marketing programs, self-insurance reserves and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Business Combinations — The Company uses the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, the Company’s financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Any excess of the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets over the purchase price is recorded as a gain on bargain purchase.
Cash Equivalents— Cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months.
Restricted Cash— Restricted cash includes items such as cash deposits which serve as collateral for certain commodity hedging contracts as well as the Company'sCompany’s high deductible workers’ compensation insurance program.
Receivables — Receivables are reported at net realizable value. This value includes appropriate allowances for doubtful accounts, cash discounts and other amounts which the Company does not ultimately expect to collect. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical losses as well as the economic status of and its relationship with its customers, especially those identified as “at risk.” A receivable is considered past due if payments have not been received within the agreed upon invoice terms. Receivables are written off against the allowance when the customer files for bankruptcy protection or are otherwise deemed to be uncollectible based upon the Company’s evaluation of the customer’s solvency. The Weetabix segment sells certain receivables to third party institutions without recourse. Receivables sold during the yearyears ended September 30, 20182020 and 2019 were $125.0 and $120.7, respectively.
were $137.3 and receivables sold in fiscal 2017 subsequent to July 3, 2017, the date of the Weetabix Group acquisition (as defined in Note 4), were $37.3.
Inventories — Inventories, other than flocks, are generally valued at the lower of average cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value (“NRV”). Reported amounts have been reduced by an allowance for obsolete product and packaging materials based on a review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. Flock inventory represents the cost of purchasing and raising chicken flocks to egg laying maturity. The costs included in our flock inventory include the costs of the chicks, the feed fed to the birds and the labor and overhead costs incurred to operate the pullet facilities until the birds are transferred into the laying facilities, at which time their cost is amortized to operations, as cost of goods sold, over their expected useful lives of one to two years.
Restructuring Expenses —Restructuring charges principally consist of severance, accelerated stock compensation and other employee separation costs and accelerated depreciation. The Company recognizes restructuring obligations and liabilities for exit and disposal activities at fair value in the period the liability is incurred. Employee severance costs are expensed when they become probable and reasonably estimable under established severance plans. Depreciation expense related to assets that will be disposed of or idled as a part of the restructuring activity is accelerated through the expected date of the asset shut down. See Note 5 for information about restructuring expenses.
Held for Sale Assets and Liabilities — Assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale if the Company has committed to a plan for selling the assets and liabilities, is actively and reasonably marketing them and sale is reasonably expected within one year. The carrying value of assets held for sale is included in “Current assets held for sale” and “Other assets held for sale” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of liabilities held for sale is included in “Current liabilities held for sale” and “Other liabilities held for sale” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 6 for information about assets and liabilities held for sale.
Property — Property is recorded at cost, and depreciation expense is generally provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the properties. Estimated useful lives range from 1 to 29 years for machinery and equipment; 1 to 4038 years for buildings, building improvements and leasehold improvements; and 1 to 7 years for software. Total depreciation expense was $221.0, $164.0$209.6, $218.3 and $150.2$221.0 in fiscal 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Any gains and losses incurred on the sale or disposal of assets are included in “Other operating expenses, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Repair and maintenance costs incurred in connection with on-goingongoing and planned major maintenance activities are accounted for under the direct expensing method. Property consisted of:
| | | | September 30, | | September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Land and land improvements | $ | 88.2 |
| | $ | 90.9 |
| Land and land improvements | $ | 93.1 | | | $ | 91.1 | |
| Buildings and leasehold improvements | 720.7 |
| | 699.4 |
| Buildings and leasehold improvements | 880.5 | | | 796.7 | |
| Machinery and equipment | 1,507.4 |
| | 1,439.3 |
| Machinery and equipment | 1,766.8 | | | 1,595.8 | |
| Software | 112.0 |
| | 64.5 |
| Software | 111.4 | | | 106.0 | |
| Construction in progress | 114.7 |
| | 100.0 |
| Construction in progress | 127.4 | | | 147.3 | |
| | 2,543.0 |
| | 2,394.1 |
| | 2,979.2 | | | 2,736.9 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | (833.3 | ) | | (703.4 | ) | Accumulated depreciation | (1,199.5) | | | (1,000.9) | |
| | $ | 1,709.7 |
| | $ | 1,690.7 |
| | $ | 1,779.7 | | | $ | 1,736.0 | |
Other Intangible Assets — Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationships, trademarks and trademarks/brands acquired in business combinations and include both indefinite and definite-lived assets. Amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets, which is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, was $177.4, $159.1$160.3, $161.3 and $152.6$177.4 in fiscal 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively. For the definite-lived intangible assets recorded as of September 30, 2018,2020, amortization expense of $159.2, $159.2, $159.2, $156.4$160.4, $160.4, $160.2, $159.0 and $159.0$157.7 is expected for fiscal 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2023,2025, respectively. Other intangible assets consisted of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| Carrying
Amount | | Accum.
Amort. | | Net
Amount | | Carrying
Amount | | Accum.
Amort. | | Net
Amount |
| Subject to amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships | $ | 2,304.8 | | | $ | (681.9) | | | $ | 1,622.9 | | | $ | 2,297.2 | | | $ | (562.2) | | | $ | 1,735.0 | |
| Trademarks and brands | 795.0 | | | (266.9) | | | 528.1 | | | 793.7 | | | (225.2) | | | 568.5 | |
| Other | 3.1 | | | (3.1) | | | 0 | | | 3.1 | | | (3.1) | | | 0 | |
| 3,102.9 | | | (951.9) | | | 2,151.0 | | | 3,094.0 | | | (790.5) | | | 2,303.5 | |
| Not subject to amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trademarks and brands | 1,046.5 | | | — | | | 1,046.5 | | | 1,035.0 | | | — | | | 1,035.0 | |
| $ | 4,149.4 | | | $ | (951.9) | | | $ | 3,197.5 | | | $ | 4,129.0 | | | $ | (790.5) | | | $ | 3,338.5 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2018 | | September 30, 2017 |
| | Carrying Amount | | Accum. Amort. | | Net Amount | | Carrying Amount | | Accum. Amort. | | Net Amount |
| Subject to amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships | $ | 2,307.0 |
| | $ | (444.4 | ) | | $ | 1,862.6 |
| | $ | 2,249.3 |
| | $ | (416.7 | ) | | $ | 1,832.6 |
|
| Trademarks and brands | 768.5 |
| | (188.2 | ) | | 580.3 |
| | 834.1 |
| | (162.9 | ) | | 671.2 |
|
| Other | 3.1 |
| | (3.1 | ) | | — |
| | 21.7 |
| | (9.8 | ) | | 11.9 |
|
| | 3,078.6 |
| | (635.7 | ) | | 2,442.9 |
| | 3,105.1 |
| | (589.4 | ) | | 2,515.7 |
|
| Not subject to amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trademarks and brands | 1,096.4 |
| | — |
| | 1,096.4 |
| | 838.2 |
| | — |
| | 838.2 |
|
| | $ | 4,175.0 |
| | $ | (635.7 | ) | | $ | 3,539.3 |
| | $ | 3,943.3 |
| | $ | (589.4 | ) | | $ | 3,353.9 |
|
Recoverability of Assets — The Company continually evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred which might impair the recoverability of the carrying value of its assets, including property, identifiable intangibles, goodwill and goodwill.right-of-use (“ROU”) assets. Trademarks with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year following the annual forecasting process, or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate the trademark may be impaired. The trademark impairment tests require usthe Company to estimate the fair value of the trademark and compare it to its carrying value. The estimated fair value is determined using an income-based approach (the relief-from-royalty method), which requires significant assumptions for each brand, including estimates regarding future revenue growth, discount rates and appropriate royalty rates. Assumptions are determined after consideration of several factors for each brand, including profit levels, research of external royalty rates by third party experts and the relative importance of each brand to the Company. Revenue growth assumptions are based on historical trends and management’s expectations for future growth by brand. The discount rate is based on a weighted-average cost of capital utilizing industry market data of similar companies.
In addition, definite-lived assets and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reassessed as needed when information becomes available that is believed to negatively impact the fair market value of an asset. In general, an asset is deemed impaired and written down to its fair value if estimated related future cash flows are less than its carrying amount. See Note 7 for information about goodwill impairments.
For the year ended September 30, 2020, the Company conducted impairment reviews and concluded there was no impairment of other intangible assets as of September 30, 2020.
At September 30, 2019, the Company recorded a definite-lived intangible impairment charge of $14.6 for the All Whites trademark in the Refrigerated Retail segment to adjust its carrying value to 0. The impairment charge for the All Whites trademark was the result of a strategic decision made by new Refrigerated Retail management in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019 to discontinue use of the brand name. All products previously sold under the All Whites brand name are now being marketed and sold under the Bob Evans Egg Whites brand name.
At September 30, 2018, the Company recorded an indefinite-lived intangible impairment charge of $124.9 for the Weetabix trademark to adjust its carrying value to its estimated fair value of $261.8. The impairment charge for the Weetabix trademark iswas a result of reduced branded cereal volumes related to Weetabix’s pricing reset and shifting consumer preferences to private label products.
For the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company conducted impairment reviews and concluded there was no impairment
These fair value measurements fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as described in Note 15. The trademark impairment losses are reported in “Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets” onin the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Deferred Compensation Investments — The Company funds a portion of its deferred compensation liability by investing in certain mutual funds or funds that employ a similar investment strategy, and are purchased in substantially the same amounts as selected by the participating employees. Because management’s intent is to invest in a manner that matches the deferral options chosen by the participants and those participants can elect to transfer amounts ininto or out of each of the designated deferral options at any time, these investments have been classified as trading assets and are stated at fair value in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 15). Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on these assets are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset the related change in the deferred compensation liability.
Derivative Financial Instruments — In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to commodity price risks relating to the acquisition of raw materials and supplies, interest rate risks relating to floating rate debt and foreign currency exchange rate risks. The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments, including (but not limited to) futures contracts, option contracts, forward contracts and swaps, to manage certain of these exposures by hedging when it is practical to do so. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
The Company’s derivative programs include strategies that qualify and strategies that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. To qualify for hedge accounting, the hedging relationship, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, is expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged risk during the period that the hedge is designated. All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative is designated as a hedge on the date in which the derivative contract is entered. A derivative could be designated as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability
(cash (cash flow hedge) or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Some derivatives may also be considered natural hedging instruments, where changes in their fair value act as economic offsets to changes in fair value of the underlying hedged item and are not designated for hedge accounting. The Company does not have any derivatives currently designated as fair value hedges.
The effective portion of gains and losses on cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. If the hedge is no longer effective, all changes in the fair value of the derivative are included in earnings for each period until the instrument matures. If a derivative is used as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, its changes in fair value, to the extent effective as a hedge, are recorded in OCI. The amounts recorded in OCI related to a net investment hedge would be recognized in earnings in the event the foreign operation is liquidated. Any ineffective portion of designated hedges areis recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not designated for hedge accounting are recognized in earnings. Cash flows from derivatives that are accounted for as hedges and cash flows on derivatives utilized as economic hedges are classified in the same category on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the item being hedged or on a basis consistent with the nature of the instrument.
Leases — In conjunction with the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,” on October 1, 2019, the policy for lease accounting was updated. See Note 16 for a summary of the updated policy.
Revenue — In conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” on October 1, 2018, the policy for recognizing revenue was updated. For fiscal 2020 and 2019, a summary of the policy for recognizing revenue was as follows:
The Company recognizes revenue when performance obligations have been satisfied by transferring control of the goods to customers. Control is generally transferred upon delivery of the goods to the customer. At the time of delivery, the customer is invoiced using previously agreed-upon credit terms. Shipping and/or handling costs that occur before the customer obtains control of the goods are deemed fulfillment activities and are accounted for as fulfillment costs. The Company’s contracts with customers generally contain one performance obligation.
Many of the Company’s contracts with customers include some form of variable consideration. The most common forms of variable consideration are trade promotions, rebates and discounts. Variable consideration is treated as a reduction of revenue at the time product revenue is recognized. Depending on the nature of the variable consideration, the Company uses either the “expected value” or the “most likely amount” method to determine variable consideration. The Company does not believe that there will be significant changes to its estimates of variable consideration when any uncertainties are resolved with customers. The Company reviews and updates estimates of variable consideration quarterly. Uncertainties related to the estimates of variable consideration are resolved in a short time frame and do not require any additional constraint on variable consideration.
The Company’s products are sold with no right of return, except in the case of goods which do not meet product specifications or are damaged. No services beyond this assurance-type warranty are provided to customers. Customer remedies
include either a cash refund or an exchange of the product. As a result, the right of return and related refund liability is estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue based on historical sales return experience.
For fiscal 2018, a summary of the policy for recognizing revenue was as follows:
Revenue is recognized when title of goods and risk of loss is transferred to the customer, as specified by the shipping terms. Net sales reflect gross sales, including amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling, less sales discounts and trade allowances (including promotional price buy downs and new item promotional funding). Customer trade allowances are generally computed as a percentage of gross sales. Products are generally sold with no right of return, except in the case of goods which do not meet product specifications or are damaged, and related reserves are maintained based on return history. If additional rights of return are granted, revenue recognition is deferred. Estimated reductions to revenue for customer incentive offerings are based upon customer redemption history.
The following table summarizes the impact of the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 on a modified retrospective basis in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2019, the year of adoption. As a result of the adoption, certain payments to customers totaling $26.1in the year ended September 30, 2019 previously classified in “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” were classified as “Net Sales” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. These payments to customers relate to trade advertisements that support the Company’s sales to customers. In accordance with ASC Topic 606, these payments were determined not to be distinct within the customer contracts and, as such, require classification within net sales. Additionally, in the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company recognized revenue of $1.2 that was deferred upon the adoption of ASC Topic 606 in accordance with the satisfaction of the related performance obligation. The recognition of unearned revenue is included in “Net Sales” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2019. No material changes to the balance sheet were required by the adoption of ASC Topic 606.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, 2019 |
| As Reported Under Topic 606 | | As Reported Under Prior Guidance | | Impact of Adoption |
| Net Sales | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 5,706.0 | | | $ | (24.9) | |
| Cost of goods sold | 3,889.0 | | | 3,889.0 | | | 0 | |
| Gross Profit | 1,792.1 | | | 1,817.0 | | | (24.9) | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 911.6 | | | 937.7 | | | (26.1) | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | 161.3 | | | 161.3 | | | 0 | |
| Gain on sale of business | (126.6) | | | (126.6) | | | 0 | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 63.3 | | | 63.3 | | | 0 | |
| Other operating expenses, net | 1.5 | | | 1.5 | | | 0 | |
| Operating Profit | $ | 781.0 | | | $ | 779.8 | | | $ | 1.2 | |
Cost of Goods Sold— Cost of goods sold includes, among other things, inbound and outbound freight costs (including the Company-owned fleet) and depreciation expense related to assets used in production, while storage and other warehousing costs are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Storage and other warehousing costs totaled $169.4, $142.9$177.8, $170.1 and $124.1$169.4 in fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Advertising— Advertising costs are expensed as incurred except for costs of producing media advertising, such as television commercials or magazine and online advertisements, which are deferred until the first time the advertising takes place and amortized to the statement of operations over the time the advertising takes place. The amounts reported as assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” were $1.9$1.3 and $1.3$3.9 as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Stock-based Compensation — The Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of equity awards and the fair market value at each quarterly reporting date for liability awards. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award — the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). Any forfeitures of stock-based awards are recorded as they occur. See Note 1920 for disclosures related to stock-based compensation.
Income Tax (Benefit) ExpenseTaxes — Income tax expense (benefit) expense is estimated based on income taxes in each jurisdiction and includes the effects of both current tax exposures and the temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is
established against the related deferred tax assets to the extent that it is more likely than not that the future benefits will not be realized. Reserves are recorded for estimated exposures associated with the Company’s tax filing positions, which are subject to periodic audits by governmental taxing authorities. Interest incurred due to an underpayment of income taxes is classified as income taxes. While theThe Company considers the undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested,invested, so no United States (the “U.S.”) taxes have been provided in relation to the Company recorded a one-time transition tax on such earnings during the year ended September 30, 2018Company’s investment in accordance with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”).its foreign subsidiaries. See Note 9 for disclosures related to income taxes.
NOTE 3 — RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Company has considered all new accounting pronouncements and has concluded there are no new pronouncements (other than the ones described below) that had or will have an impact on the results of operations, OCI, financial condition, cash flows, or shareholders’ equity or disclosures based on current information.
Recently Issued
In August 2018,March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”(the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” This standards update largely alignsASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The expedients and exceptions provided by this ASU do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022. This ASU is elective and effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020, the date this ASU was issued. An entity may elect to apply the amendments for contract modifications provided by this ASU as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020. Once elected, this ASU must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU as it relates to its debt and hedging relationships that reference LIBOR.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This ASU provides guidance on recognizing implementation coststhe measurement of credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. This ASU replaces the current incurred inloss impairment approach with a cloud computing arrangement that ismethodology to reflect expected credit losses and requires consideration of a service contract with that for implementation costs incurredbroader range of reasonable and supportable information to develop or obtain internal-use software, including hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license.explain credit loss estimates. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods therein (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2021), with early adoption permitted.. The Company has substantially completed its analysis of this ASU’s impact on its trade receivables. The Company will early adopt this
ASU on October 1, 20182020, and does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” This ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions for recognizing deferred taxes for investments, performing intra-period allocations and calculating income taxes in interim periods. The Company early adopted this ASU as of June 30, 2020 on a prospective basis, as permitted by the standard. This change is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.” This standards update removes, clarifies and adds certain disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. This ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2020 and interim periods therein (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2021), with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact and timing of adopting this standard.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” This standards update removes, modifies and adds certain disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods therein (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2021), with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact and timing of adopting this standard.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This standards update largely aligns the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees and nonemployees, whereby the existing employee guidance will apply to nonemployee share-based transactions (as long as the transaction is not effectively a form of financing), with the exception of specific guidance related to the attribution of compensation cost. The cost of nonemployee awards will continue to be recorded as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services, and the contractual term will be able to be used in lieu of an expected term in the option-pricing model for nonemployee awards. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2020). The Company will early adopt this ASU on October 1, 2018 on a prospective basis, as permitted by the standard. The Company had not issued any nonemployee share-based payment awards as of September 30, 2018, however, share-based payment awards granted to employees of 8th Avenue will be accounted for as nonemployee compensation beginning on October 1, 2018.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” This standards update requires an entity to report the service cost component of periodic net benefit cost as an operating expense in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. Other components of net benefit cost are to be presented outside of income from operations in the income statement separately from the service cost component. The amendments in this ASU also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. The Company will adopt this standard on October 1, 2018 and will use the retrospective method of adoption, as required by the standard.ASU. The adoption of this ASU will result in a change in operating profit and a corresponding change to other (income) expense, net to reflect the exclusion of all components of net benefit cost, with the exception of service cost, from operating profit. The reclassification would have resulted in a decrease in operating profit of $14.0 and $3.6 for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and an increase in operating profit of $3.1 for the year ended September 30, 2016. This ASU also permits an entity to capitalize the service cost component as part of an asset, such as inventory, on a prospective basis. This change isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This standards updateASU requires a company to recognize right-of-useROU assets and lease liabilities with terms greater than one year on its balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 offers specific accounting guidance for lessees, lessors and sale and leaseback transactions. Lessees and lessors are required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2020), with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this standard on October 1, 2019 and expects to use the modified retrospective method of adoption applied prospectively as of the adoption date. This ASU will result in a material increase in both assets and liabilities, however, the Company is unable to quantify the impact at this time. In addition, the Company expects expanded disclosures to present additional information related to its leasing arrangements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.” This standards update requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents, and therefore, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of year cash balance to the end of year cash balance as shown on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2019), with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this standard on October 1, 2018 and will use the retrospective method of adoption. The Company currently classifies changes in restricted cash as an investing activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, not as a component of cash and cash equivalents as required by this ASU. The change in restricted cash included in “Net Cash Used in Investing Activities”
on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows was $(1.3), $4.2 and $10.4 for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which will supersede all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. This ASU’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also calls for additional disclosures around the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017 (i.e., Post’s financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2019). The Company has completed its assessment of the impact this standard will have on its accounting policies, processes, system requirements, internal controls and disclosures. The Company will adopt this standard on October 1, 2018 and will use the modified retrospective transition method of adoption. The adoption will not have a material impact on its financial statements as the impact of this ASU will be limited to recognition timing and classification changes of immaterial amounts within the statement of operations and balance sheet.
Recently Adopted
In MarchJuly 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, “Income Taxes2018-11, “Leases (Topic 740)842): AmendmentsTargeted Improvements.” This ASU provides an additional transition method by allowing entities to initially apply the new lease standard at the date of adoption with a cumulative effect adjustment to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118,” which codifies the SEC’s interpretive guidance released on December 22, 2017, when the Tax Act was signed into law. See Note 9 for additional information regarding the adoptionopening balance of this standard.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” This standards update amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 220 “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income,” to allow a reclassification from accumulated OCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting fromin the Tax Act. In accordance with this standard, the Company early adopted this ASU during the second quarterperiod of fiscal 2018, which resulted in an adjustment to “Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)” and “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $1.4 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” This standards update requires most inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or NRV, thereby simplifying the previous guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market is defined as replacement cost, NRV or NRV less a normal profit margin.adoption. This ASU doesalso gives lessors the option of electing, as a practical expedient by class of underlying asset, not apply to inventory that is measured using eitherseparate the last-in, first-out method or the retail inventory method.lease and non-lease components of a contract when those lease contracts meet certain criteria. The Company adopted this ASU duringthese ASUs on October 1, 2019, as required by these ASUs, and utilized the first quartercumulative effect adjustment approach. At adoption, the Company recognized ROU assets and lease liabilities of fiscal 2018.$158.1 and $168.2, respectively, on the balance sheet at October 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASUthese ASUs did not have a materialmaterially impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements of operations or cash flows. In addition, the Company provides expanded disclosures related disclosures.to its leasing arrangements in accordance with these ASUs. For additional information, refer to Note 16.
NOTE 4 — BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND DIVESTITURES
The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting, whereby the results of operations are included in the financial statements from the date of acquisition. The purchase price is allocated to acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, and anyacquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is allocated torecorded as goodwill. Any excess of the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets over the purchase price is recorded as a gain on bargain purchase. Goodwill represents the value the Company expects to achieve through the implementation of operational synergies and the expansion of the business into new or growing segments of the industry.
Fiscal 20182020
AcquisitionsOn July 1, 2020, the Company completed its acquisition of Henningsen Foods, Inc. (“Henningsen”) from a subsidiary of Kewpie Corporation for $20.0, subject to working capital and other adjustments, resulting in a payment at closing of $22.7. The acquisition was completed using cash on hand. At September 30, 2020, the Company recorded an estimated working capital settlement receivable of $1.8, which was included in “Receivables, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Henningsen is a producer of egg and meat products and is reported in the Foodservice segment (see Note 22). Based upon the preliminary purchase price allocation, the Company identified and recorded $32.6 of net assets, including cash of $2.8, which exceeded the purchase price paid for Henningsen. As a result, the Company recorded a gain of $11.7, which was included in “Other operating (income) expenses, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2020.
Fiscal 2018
On January 12, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Bob Evans”), resulting in the Company owning all of the outstanding shares of Bob Evans common stock. The Company paid each holder of shares of Bob Evans common stock, other than holders who demanded appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock under Delaware law and had not withdrawn their demands as of the closing date, $77.00 per share, resulting in a payment at closing of $1,381.2 (which, in addition to the amounts paid to Bob Evans stockholders, includes amounts paid to retire certain debt and other obligations of Bob Evans). Any shares of Bob Evans common stock subject to appraisal as of the closing date were canceled and no longer outstanding after closing. The closing payment did not include any amounts due to former holders of approximately 4.35 shares of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal under Delaware law and had not withdrawn their demands as of the closing date. The
In December 2018, the Company estimates additionalmade payments of $342.4 will be made subsequent$257.6 to the closing date, which includes payments to former holders of shares of Bob Evans common stock who had exerciseddemanded appraisal rights, payments in connection with Bob Evans deferred compensation plans and payments to compensate Bob Evans employees due to the cancellation of their outstanding employee stock awards. At September 30, 2018, the former holders of 3.3 shares of Bob Evans common stock had not withdrawn their appraisal demands and had not been paid for their shares of Bob Evans common stock. RelatedThe payments constituted a settlement with one former stockholder as well as prepayments of the $77.00 per share merger consideration to the remaining former stockholders who had held 2.5 shares of Bob Evans common stock. In September 2019, the Company reached settlement terms on a confidential basis with the remaining former stockholders, and had an accrual of $19.1, which was recorded as “Other current liabilities,” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2019. The final payments were made by the Company on October 1, 2019. In connection with the fiscal 2019 settlements, the Company recorded expense of $9.7, which was included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2019. In the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded interest expense of $13.4 related to these shares, which was included in “Interest expense, net” in the Company accrued $267.0 atConsolidated Statement of Operations. No such accruals or expense were recorded for the year ended September 30, 2018, which is2020.
For additional information regarding the numberproceedings brought by former holders of Bob Evans common stock who demanded appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock for which former Bob Evans stockholders hadunder Delaware law, refer to Note 18.
demanded appraisal and not withdrawn their demands multiplied by the $77.00 per share merger consideration plus accrued interest at the Federal Reserve Discount Rate plus a spread of 5.00%. The liability is reported in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Bob Evans is a producer of refrigerated potato and pasta side dishes, pork sausage and a variety of refrigerated and frozen convenience food itemsitems. The acquisition strengthened the Company’s position in the foodservice and refrigerated retail channels. Bob Evans is reported in two reportable segments. The results of Bob Evans’s foodservice operations are reported in the Company’sFoodservice segment, and the results of Bob Evans’s retail operations are reported in the Refrigerated FoodRetail segment (see Note 22). Based upon the preliminary purchase price allocation, the Company recorded $376.0 of customer relationships to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 18 years, $6.0 of definite-lived trademarks to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 10 years and $400.0 of indefinite-lived trademarks. Net sales and operating profit for Bob Evans included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were $333.1 and $14.5, respectively, for the year ended September 30, 2018.
Certain preliminary values of the Bob Evans acquisition, including property, goodwill, other intangible assets and deferred taxes, are not yet finalized pending the final purchase price allocation and are subject to change once additional information is obtained.
The goodwill generated by the Company’s acquisition of Bob Evans willis not be deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes; however, $13.8 of goodwill generated by business combinations completed by Bob Evans in periods prior to its acquisition was transferred to Post and is expected to be tax deductible.
The following table provides the preliminaryfinal allocation of the purchase price related to the fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans based upon the fair value of assets and liabilities assumed, including the provisional amounts recognized related to the acquisition as of September 30, 2018. Measurement period adjustments have been made to the allocation of purchase price since the date of the Bob Evans acquisition.
|
| | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15.6 |
|
| Receivables | 58.5 |
|
| Inventories | 27.1 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 34.3 |
|
| Property | 184.3 |
|
| Goodwill | 898.3 |
|
| Other intangible assets | 782.0 |
|
| Other assets | 0.4 |
|
| Accounts payable | (18.2 | ) |
| Other current liabilities | (58.5 | ) |
| Deferred tax liability - long-term | (194.9 | ) |
| Other liabilities | (5.3 | ) |
| Total acquisition cost | $ | 1,723.6 |
|
Transactions Subsequent to Period End
On October 1, 2018, the Company completed the previously announced 8th Avenue Transactions pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2018, among Post, 8th Avenue and THL Equity Fund VIII Investors (PB), LLC in which Post and THL separately capitalized 8th Avenue. Upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions, 8th Avenue became the holding company for Post’s private brands business, reported herein as Post’s Private Brands segment, and Post received total gross proceeds of $875.0, retaining shares of common stock equal to 60.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue. Post’s gross proceeds consisted of (i) $250.0 from THL and (ii) $625.0 from a committed senior increasing rate bridge loan (the “Bridge Loan”), which was funded prior to the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions. 8th Avenue refinanced the Bridge Loan promptly after the time of the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions on October 1, 2018, with proceeds from permanent debt financings, which include two term loans and a revolving credit facility. Pursuant to the 8th Avenue Transactions, THL received 2.5 shares of 8th Avenue preferred stock with an 11% cumulative, quarterly compounding dividend and $100.00 per share liquidation value and 39.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue.
Effective October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue is no longer consolidated in the Company's financial statements and the 60.5% common equity retained interest in 8th Avenue is accounted for using the equity method. In determining the accounting treatment of the retained interest, management concluded that 8th Avenue is not a variable interest entity as defined by ASC Topic 810 “Consolidation,” and as such was evaluated under the voting interest model. Based on the terms of 8th Avenue's governing documents, management determined that the Company does not have a controlling voting interest in 8th Avenue but does retain significant influence and therefore the use of the equity method of accounting is required. At September 30, 2018, all of the Private Brands segment assets and liabilities, excluding cash, are classified as held for sale (see Note 6).
Fiscal 2017
Acquisitions
On July 3, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Latimer Newco 2 Limited (“Latimer”), and all of Latimer’s direct and indirect subsidiaries at the time of acquisition, including Weetabix Limited (collectively the “Weetabix Group”) for a purchase price of approximately £1,400.0 with a payment at closing of £1,454.1, excluding £48.0 of cash acquired (approximately $1,887.2, excluding $62.2 of cash acquired). The Weetabix Group is a packaged food company that primarily produces branded and private label RTE cereal and muesliproducts. The Weetabix Group is reported in two reportable segments. The results of the Weetabix operations outside of North America (“Weetabix”) are reported in the Weetabix segment, and the Weetabix North American operations (“Weetabix NA”) are reported in the Post Consumer Brands segment (see Note 22). Based on the purchase price allocation of Weetabix, the Company recorded $172.8 of customer relationships to be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately 20 years, $29.5 to definite-lived trademarks and brands to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 16 years and $385.1 of indefinite-lived trademarks. Based on the purchase price allocation of Weetabix NA, the Company recorded $13.6 of customer relationships to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 21 years.
The following table provides the allocation of the purchase price related to the fiscal 2017 acquisition of the Weetabix Group based upon the fair value of assets and liabilities assumed, including the provisional amounts recognized related to the acquisition as of September 30, 2017, as well as measurement period adjustments made during the year ended September 30, 2018.first quarter of fiscal 2019. The final fair valueallocation of goodwill related to the acquisitionpurchase price was finalized as of the Weetabix GroupDecember 31, 2018, and no additional adjustments have been or will not be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.made.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition Date Amounts Recognized as of September 30, 2018 (a) | | Adjustments During Fiscal 2019 | | Acquisition Date Amounts Recognized (as Adjusted) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15.6 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 15.6 | |
| | | | | |
| Receivables | 58.5 | | | 0 | | | 58.5 | |
| | | | | |
| Inventories | 27.1 | | | 0 | | | 27.1 | |
| | | | | |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 34.3 | | | 0 | | | 34.3 | |
| Property | 184.3 | | | 0 | | | 184.3 | |
| Goodwill | 898.3 | | | (0.7) | | | 897.6 | |
| Other intangible assets | 782.0 | | | 0 | | | 782.0 | |
| | | | | |
| Other assets | 0.4 | | | 0 | | | 0.4 | |
| | | | | |
| Accounts payable | (18.2) | | | 0 | | | (18.2) | |
| | | | | |
| Other current liabilities | (58.5) | | | 0 | | | (58.5) | |
| | | | | |
| Deferred tax liability - long-term | (194.9) | | | 0.7 | | | (194.2) | |
| Other liabilities | (5.3) | | | 0 | | | (5.3) | |
| | | | | |
Total acquisition cost (b) | $ | 1,723.6 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,723.6 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Acquisition Date Amounts Recognized as of September 30, 2017 (a) | | Adjustments During the Year Ended September 30, 2018 | | Acquisition Date Amounts Recognized (as Adjusted) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 62.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 62.2 |
|
| Receivables (c) | 39.7 |
| | (1.9 | ) | | 37.8 |
|
| Inventories (b), (c) | 63.4 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 63.2 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1.2 |
| | — |
| | 1.2 |
|
| Property (b) | 283.9 |
| | (3.0 | ) | | 280.9 |
|
| Goodwill (d) | 969.3 |
| | 11.5 |
| | 980.8 |
|
| Other intangible assets (b) | 608.4 |
| | (7.4 | ) | | 601.0 |
|
| Other assets | 112.0 |
| | — |
| | 112.0 |
|
| Accounts payable | (66.3 | ) | | — |
| | (66.3 | ) |
| Other current liabilities (c) | (28.4 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (28.5 | ) |
| Deferred tax liability - long-term (c) | (137.6 | ) | | 1.1 |
| | (136.5 | ) |
| Other liabilities | (10.9 | ) | | — |
| | (10.9 | ) |
| Noncontrolling interest | (9.7 | ) | | — |
| | (9.7 | ) |
| Total acquisition cost | $ | 1,887.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,887.2 |
|
(a)As previously reported in Post’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2018 filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 17, 2017.16, 2018.
(b) Adjustments reflect updated ASC 805 valuationTotal acquisition cost is comprised of tangible and intangible assets.
(c) Adjustments reflect other Weetabix Group purchase accounting adjustments.
(d) Adjustment reflects the change in goodwill as a result of the adjustments described in (b) and (c).
On October 3, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of National Pasteurized Eggs, Inc. (“NPE”) for $93.5, subject to working capital and other adjustments, resulting in a payment$1,381.2 paid at closing and additional payments of $97.0. In February 2017, a final settlement$342.4, which includes payments to former holders of net working capitalshares of Bob Evans common stock who exercised appraisal rights, payments in connection with Bob Evans deferred compensation plans and other adjustments was reached, resulting in an amount backpayments to compensate Bob Evans employees due to the Companycancellation of $1.2. NPE is a producer of pasteurized shell eggs, including cage-free eggs, and is reported in the Refrigerated Food segment (see Note 22). Based upon the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded $43.9 of customer relationships to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 16 years and $7.5 of trademarks and brands to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 20 years.their outstanding employee stock awards.
The following table provides the allocation of the purchase price related to the fiscal 2017 acquisition of NPE based upon the fair value of assets and liabilities assumed. The final fair value of goodwill related to the acquisition of NPE will not be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
|
| | | |
| | NPE |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5.6 |
|
| Receivables | 8.5 |
|
| Inventories | 2.1 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 0.4 |
|
| Property | 10.4 |
|
| Goodwill | 46.3 |
|
| Other intangible assets | 51.4 |
|
| Current portion of long-term debt | (0.1 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (6.3 | ) |
| Other current liabilities | (2.9 | ) |
| Long-term debt | (0.2 | ) |
| Deferred tax liability - long-term | (18.7 | ) |
| Total acquisition cost | $ | 96.5 |
|
Fiscal 2016
Acquisitions
On October 3, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Willamette Egg Farms (“WEF”) for $90.0, subject to working capital and other adjustments, resulting in a payment at closing of $109.0. In December 2015, a final settlement of net working capital and other adjustments was reached, resulting in an additional amount paid by the Company of $4.6. WEF is a producer, processor and wholesale distributor of eggs and egg products and is reported in the Refrigerated Food segment (see Note 22). Based upon the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded $12.7 of customer relationships to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 20 years and $2.5 to trademarks and brands to be amortized over a weighted-average period of 20 years.
The following table provides the allocation of the purchase price related to the fiscal 2016 acquisition of WEF based upon the fair value of assets and liabilities assumed. The final fair value of goodwill related to the acquisition of WEF will be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
|
| | | |
| | WEF |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 19.2 |
|
| Receivables | 11.1 |
|
| Inventories | 10.3 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 0.5 |
|
| Property | 56.2 |
|
| Goodwill | 4.2 |
|
| Other intangible assets | 15.2 |
|
| Other assets | 0.1 |
|
| Accounts payable | (2.2 | ) |
| Other current liabilities | (1.0 | ) |
| Total acquisition cost | $ | 113.6 |
|
Transaction-related expensesAcquisition-Related Expenses
The Company incurs transaction-related expenses in conjunction with both completed and contemplated acquisitions, divestitures and mergers.acquisitions. These expenses generally include third party costs for due diligence, advisory services and transaction success fees. During the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, the Company incurred transaction-related expenses of $35.8, $30.5$3.8, $8.9 and $8.5,$23.4, respectively, which were recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, transaction-related expenses included costs attributable to the 8th Avenue Transactions of $12.4 and $0.6, respectively. There were no transaction-related expenses related to the 8th Avenue Transactions incurred in the year ended September 30, 2016. In addition, during the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company
recorded net foreign currency gains of $30.0 related to cash held in Pounds Sterling to fund the acquisition of the Weetabix Group, which were recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Unaudited Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma information presents a summary of the combined results of operations of the Company and the aggregate results of all businesses acquired in fiscal 2018 2017 and 2016 for the periodsperiod presented as if the fiscal 2018 acquisition of Bob Evans had occurred on October 1, 2016, the fiscal 2017 acquisitions had occurred on October 1, 2015 and the fiscal 2016 acquisition had occurred on October 1, 2014, along with certain pro forma adjustments. Additionally, the divestiture of 8th Avenue is presented in the unaudited pro forma information as if it occurred on October 1, 2017.2016. These pro forma adjustments give effect to the amortization of certain definite-lived intangible assets, adjusted depreciation based upon fair value of assets acquired, interest expense related to the financing of the business combinations, inventory revaluation adjustments on acquired businesses, transaction and extinguished debtacquisition costs and related income taxes. The following unaudited pro forma information has been prepared for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as they would have been had the acquisitionsacquisition occurred on the assumed dates,date, nor is it necessarily an indication of future operating results.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Pro forma net sales | $ | 5,587.1 |
| | $ | 5,258.3 |
| | $ | 5,751.2 |
|
| Pro forma net earnings available to common shareholders | $ | 432.1 |
| | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
|
| Pro forma basic earnings per share | $ | 6.49 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
| Pro forma diluted earnings per share | $ | 5.83 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 2018 |
| Pro forma net sales | | | | | $ | 6,423.8 | |
| Pro forma net earnings available to common shareholders | | | | | $ | 486.4 | |
| Pro forma basic earnings per share | | | | | $ | 7.30 | |
| Pro forma diluted earnings per share | | | | | $ | 6.54 | |
NOTE 5 — RESTRUCTURING
In February 2018, the Company announced its plan to close its Post Consumer Brands RTE cereal manufacturing facility in Clinton, Massachusetts which manufactures certain Weetabix Group products distributed in North America.(the “Clinton Facility”). The transfer of production capabilities to other Post Consumer Brands facilities and the closure of the facility is expected to beClinton Facility was completed byat September 30, 2019.
In September 2015, the Company announced its plan to close its Dymatize manufacturing facility located in Farmers Branch, Texas and permanently transfered production to third party facilities under co-manufacturing agreements. Plant production ceased Final cash payments for employee-related costs were made in the fourthfirst quarter of 2015 and the facility was sold in December 2016.fiscal 2020. No additional restructuring costs were incurred in fiscal 2018 or 2017.
In May 2015, the Company announced its plan to consolidate its cereal business administrative offices into its Lakeville, Minnesota location. In connection with the consolidation, the Company closed its office located in Parsippany, New Jersey and relocated those functions as well as certain functions located in Battle Creek, Michigan2020. For additional information on assets held for sale related to the Lakeville office. The Parsippany office closure, was completed during fiscal 2016. No additional restructuring costs were incurred in fiscal 2018 or 2017.see Note 6.
Amounts related to the restructuring events are shown in the following table. All costs are recognized in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations with the exception of accelerated depreciation expense, incurred in the year ended September 30, 2018, which is included in “Cost of goods sold.” These expenses are not included in the measure of segment performance for any segment (see Note 22).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee-Related Costs | | | | Accelerated Depreciation | | Total |
| Balance, September 30, 2017 | $ | 0 | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Charge to expense | 2.7 | | | | | 2.5 | | | 5.2 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Non-cash charges | 0 | | | | | (2.5) | | | (2.5) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | $ | 2.7 | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 2.7 | |
| Charge to expense | 2.2 | | | | | 7.4 | | | 9.6 | |
| Cash payments | (4.8) | | | | | 0 | | | (4.8) | |
| Non-cash charges | 0 | | | | | (7.4) | | | (7.4) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2019 | $ | 0.1 | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0.1 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Cash payments | (0.1) | | | | | 0 | | | (0.1) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Balance, September 30, 2020 | $ | 0 | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total expected restructuring charge | $ | 4.9 | | | | | $ | 9.9 | | | $ | 14.8 | |
| Cumulative incurred to date | 4.9 | | | | | 9.9 | | | 14.8 | |
| Remaining expected restructuring charge | $ | 0 | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Employee-Related Costs | | Accelerated Depreciation | | Total |
| Balance, September 30, 2015 | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10.5 |
|
| Charge to expense | 2.1 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Cash payments | (10.6 | ) | | — |
| | (10.6 | ) |
| Non-cash charges | (0.9 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (1.3 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2016 | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.1 |
|
| Cash payments | (1.1 | ) | | — |
| | (1.1 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2017 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Charge to expense | 2.7 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 5.2 |
|
| Non-cash charges | — |
| | (2.5 | ) | | (2.5 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | $ | 2.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2.7 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Total expected restructuring charge | $ | 17.7 |
| | $ | 9.0 |
| | $ | 26.7 |
|
| Cumulative incurred to date | 15.3 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 20.3 |
|
| Remaining expected restructuring charge | $ | 2.4 |
| | $ | 4.0 |
| | $ | 6.4 |
|
NOTE 6 — ASSETSDIVESTITURES AND LIABILITIESAMOUNTS HELD FOR SALE
The major classesDivestiture
On October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue was separately capitalized through the 8th Avenue Transactions, and 8th Avenue became the holding company for Post’s historical private brands business. Post received gross proceeds of assets$875.0 from the 8th Avenue Transactions, as well as $16.8 related to final working capital adjustments, retaining shares of common stock equal to 60.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue. Post’s gross proceeds consisted of (i) $250.0 from a third party and liabilities comprising “Current assets held for sale,” “Other assets held for sale,” “Current liabilities held for sale ” and “Other liabilities held for sale” on(ii) $625.0 from a committed senior increasing rate bridge loan (the “2018 Bridge Loan”), which was funded in fiscal 2018 prior to the Consolidated Balance Sheet asclosing of September 30, 2018 are shown in the following table. There were no assets or liabilities held for sale at September 30, 2017.
|
| | | |
| Current assets held for sale | |
| Restricted cash | $ | 0.7 |
|
| Receivables, net | 79.8 |
|
| Inventories | 111.6 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1.5 |
|
| Property, net (a) | 1.4 |
|
| | $ | 195.0 |
|
| Other assets held for sale | |
| Property, net (a) | $ | 165.1 |
|
| Goodwill | 417.1 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | 270.4 |
|
| Other assets | 4.0 |
|
| | $ | 856.6 |
|
| Current liabilities held for sale | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 37.4 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 28.2 |
|
| | $ | 65.6 |
|
| Other liabilities held for sale | |
| Long-term debt | $ | 614.6 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 79.9 |
|
| Other liabilities | 0.6 |
|
| | $ | 695.1 |
|
| |
(a) | In accordance with ASC Topic 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” the building classified as held for sale related to the closure of the Company’s Post Consumer Brands cereal warehouse in Clinton, Massachusetts and the 8th Avenue property held for sale are classified as current and noncurrent, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
In connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions (see Note 4),17). A third party received 2.5 shares of 8th Avenue preferred stock with an 11% cumulative, quarterly compounding dividend and a $100.00 per share liquidation value and shares of common stock equal to 39.5% of the common equity in 8th Avenue. During the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company had assetsrecorded a gain of $126.6 related to the 8th Avenue Transactions, which was reported as “Gain on sale of business” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The gain included foreign exchange losses previously recorded in accumulated OCI of $42.1. Effective October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue was no longer consolidated in the Company’s financial statements and liabilities heldthe 60.5% common equity retained interest in 8th Avenue is accounted for sale at September 30, 2018.using the equity method. For additional information regarding the Company’s equity method investment in 8th Avenue, refer to Note 8. The Company recorded earnings before income taxes relatedincurred third party costs attributable to the 8th Avenue reported herein as the Private Brands segment,Transactions of $60.8, $58.1$9.9 and $71.4$12.4 in the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, 2017respectively, which were included in “Selling,
general and 2016,administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No third party costs attributable to the 8th Avenue Transactions were incurred by the Company during the year ended September 30, 2020.
In order to calculate the total recorded gain related to the 8th Avenue Transactions of $126.6, management was required to estimate the fair value of the Company’s equity method investment in 8th Avenue. In making this estimate, management used an approach combining the estimated implied value from the 8th Avenue Transactions, an income approach and a market approach, in which the greatest value was placed on the implied value from the 8th Avenue Transactions. In order to calculate the fair value implied by the 8th Avenue Transactions, management was required to estimate the value of the 8th Avenue equity. In making this estimate, management used a lattice model, which required significant assumptions, including estimates for the term, credit spread, yield volatility and risk-free rates associated with 8th Avenue’s preferred stock. The income approach was based on discounted future cash flows and required significant assumptions, including estimates regarding future revenue, profitability and capital requirements. The market approach was based on a market multiple (revenue and EBITDA, which stands for earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and required an estimate of appropriate multiples based on the market data.
Amounts Held For Sale
In connection with the closure of the Clinton Facility (see Note 5), the Company had a manufacturing plant (the “Clinton Plant”) classified as held for sale with a book value of $3.4 and $8.4 at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company sold a portion of the Clinton Plant in March 2020. Additionally, the Company had land and a building with a combined book value of $1.4 and $1.5 classified as held for sale at its Post Consumer Brands manufacturing facility in Asheboro, North Carolina (the “Asheboro Facility”) at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and land and a building with a book value of $2.5 classified as held for sale at one of its Weetabix manufacturing facilities in Corby, United Kingdom (the “Corby Facility”) at September 30, 2020. In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment,” these assets were classified as current and were reported as “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the year ended September 30, 2020, a loss on assets held for sale at September 30, 2018,of $2.7 was recorded consisting of losses of $2.6 and $0.1 related to the planned closureClinton Plant and Asheboro Facility, respectively, and was included in “Other operating (income) expenses, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In the year ended September 30, 2019, a held for sale net gain of $124.6 was recorded consisting of (i) a gain of $126.6, which was reported as “Gain on sale of business,” and a loss of $2.6, which was included in “Loss on extinguishment of debt, net,” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations related to the 8th Avenue Transactions and (ii) a gain of $0.6, which was recorded related to the sale of the Company’s Post Consumer Brands cereal warehouse at its Clinton Facility and was included in Clinton, Massachusetts (see Note 5).
Held for sale net (gains) losses of $(0.2) and $9.3 were recorded“Other operating (income) expenses, net” in the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.Consolidated Statement of Operations. There were no held for sale (gains)gains or losses recorded in the year ended September 30, 2018. The net gains and losses are reported as “Other operating expenses, net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In the year ended September 30, 2018,2020, there were no held for sale gains or losses recorded related to the Company’s Corby Facility as the book values of the assets and liabilities for 8th Avenue and the Clinton, Massachusetts manufacturing facility were both lower than fair value,value; therefore, no fair value adjustment wasadjustments were recorded at the time the assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale. Any final adjustments to the fair values
Table of 8th Avenue and the Clinton, Massachusetts manufacturing facility will be recognized upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions and the sale of the facility, respectively. In the year ended September 30, 2017, the gain related to the September 2015 closure of the Company’s Dymatize manufacturing facility located in Farmers Branch, Texas. In the year ended September 30, 2016, of the total $9.3 held for sale loss, $4.5 related to the September 2015 closure of the Company’s Dymatize manufacturing facility located in Farmers Branch, Texas and $4.8 related to the April 2013 closure of the Company’s cereal plant located in Modesto, California. These expenses are not included in the measure of segment performance for any segment (see Note 22).Contents NOTE 7 — GOODWILL
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment are noted in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Post Consumer Brands | | Weetabix | | Foodservice | | Refrigerated Retail | | BellRing Brands | | Total |
| | Post Consumer Brands | | Weetabix | | Refrigerated Food | | Active Nutrition | | Private Brands | | Total | |
| Balance, September 30, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill (gross) | $ | 1,994.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,185.3 |
| | $ | 180.7 |
| | $ | 417.1 |
| | $ | 3,777.1 |
| |
| Accumulated impairment losses | (609.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (88.3 | ) | | — |
| | (697.4 | ) | |
| Goodwill (net) | $ | 1,384.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,185.3 |
| | $ | 92.4 |
| | $ | 417.1 |
| | $ | 3,079.7 |
| |
| Goodwill acquired | 5.3 |
| | 964.0 |
| | 46.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,015.6 |
| |
| Impairment loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (26.5 | ) | | — |
| | (26.5 | ) | |
| Currency translation adjustment | 0.3 |
| | (37.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (36.8 | ) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill (gross) | $ | 1,999.6 |
| | $ | 926.9 |
| | $ | 1,231.6 |
| | $ | 180.7 |
| | $ | 417.1 |
| | $ | 4,755.9 |
| |
| Accumulated impairment losses | (609.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (114.8 | ) | | — |
| | (723.9 | ) | |
| Goodwill (net) | $ | 1,390.5 |
| | $ | 926.9 |
| | $ | 1,231.6 |
| | $ | 65.9 |
| | $ | 417.1 |
| | $ | 4,032.0 |
| |
| Goodwill acquired | — |
| | — |
| | 898.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 898.3 |
| |
| Acquisition related adjustment | 12.6 |
| | (1.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11.5 |
| |
| Held for sale assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (417.1 | ) | | (417.1 | ) | |
| Currency translation adjustment | (0.2 | ) | | (24.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (25.1 | ) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance, September 30, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill (gross) | $ | 2,012.0 |
| | $ | 900.9 |
| | $ | 2,129.9 |
| | $ | 180.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,223.5 |
| Goodwill (gross) | $ | 2,012.0 | | | $ | 900.9 | | | $ | 1,336.1 | | | $ | 793.8 | | | $ | 180.7 | | | $ | 5,223.5 | |
| Accumulated impairment losses | (609.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (114.8 | ) | | — |
| | (723.9 | ) | Accumulated impairment losses | (609.1) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (114.8) | | | (723.9) | |
| Goodwill (net) | $ | 1,402.9 |
| | $ | 900.9 |
| | $ | 2,129.9 |
| | $ | 65.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,499.6 |
| Goodwill (net) | $ | 1,402.9 | | | $ | 900.9 | | | $ | 1,336.1 | | | $ | 793.8 | | | $ | 65.9 | | | $ | 4,499.6 | |
| | Impairment loss | | Impairment loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (48.7) | | | — | | | (48.7) | |
| | Acquisition related adjustment | | Acquisition related adjustment | 0 | | | 0 | | | (0.5) | | | (0.2) | | | 0 | | | (0.7) | |
| | Currency translation adjustment | | Currency translation adjustment | (0.2) | | | (50.2) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (50.4) | |
| Balance, September 30, 2019 | | Balance, September 30, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill (gross) | | Goodwill (gross) | $ | 2,011.8 | | | $ | 850.7 | | | $ | 1,335.6 | | | $ | 793.6 | | | $ | 180.7 | | | $ | 5,172.4 | |
| Accumulated impairment losses | | Accumulated impairment losses | (609.1) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (48.7) | | | (114.8) | | | (772.6) | |
| Goodwill (net) | | Goodwill (net) | $ | 1,402.7 | | | $ | 850.7 | | | $ | 1,335.6 | | | $ | 744.9 | | | $ | 65.9 | | | $ | 4,399.8 | |
| | Currency translation adjustment | | Currency translation adjustment | 0 | | | 38.8 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 38.8 | |
| Balance, September 30, 2020 | | Balance, September 30, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill (gross) | | Goodwill (gross) | $ | 2,011.8 | | | $ | 889.5 | | | $ | 1,335.6 | | | $ | 793.6 | | | $ | 180.7 | | | $ | 5,211.2 | |
| Accumulated impairment losses | | Accumulated impairment losses | (609.1) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (48.7) | | | (114.8) | | | (772.6) | |
| Goodwill (net) | | Goodwill (net) | $ | 1,402.7 | | | $ | 889.5 | | | $ | 1,335.6 | | | $ | 744.9 | | | $ | 65.9 | | | $ | 4,438.6 | |
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquired businesses over the fair market value of their identifiable net assets. The Company conducts a goodwill impairment qualitative assessment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year following the annual forecasting process, or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. The goodwill impairment qualitative assessment requires an analysis to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of the business is less than its carrying amount. If adverse qualitative trends are identified that could negatively impact the fair value of the business, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed. In fiscal years2020, we elected not to perform a qualitative assessment and instead performed a quantitative impairment test for all reporting units, except for BellRing Brands. The Company performed a qualitative test for the BellRing Brands reporting unit, and determined there were no adverse trends that could negatively impact the fair value of the business. In fiscal 2019 and 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company elected not to perform a qualitative assessment and instead performed a quantitative impairment test for all reporting units.
The estimated fair value is determined using a combined income and market approach with a greater weighting on the income approach. The income approach is based on discounted future cash flows and requires significant assumptions, including estimates regarding future revenue, profitability, capital requirements and capital requirements.discount rates. The market approach is based on a market multiple (revenue and EBITDA which stands for earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization)EBITDA) and requires an estimate of appropriate multiples based on market data.
The Company did not record a goodwill impairment charge at September 30, 2020, as all reporting units subjected to the quantitative test passed. At September 30, 2020, the estimated fair values of all such reporting units exceeded their carrying values by at least 4% (the lowest of which was Foodservice, all others exceeded their carrying values by at least 13%). Variances between the actual performance of the businesses and the assumptions that were used in developing the estimates of fair value could result in impairment charges in future periods. Further, due to the low headroom in the Foodservice reporting unit, small changes in significant assumptions may have resulted in an impairment in the current period. Factors that could create variances in the estimated fair value of the reporting units include but are not limited to (i) fluctuations in forecasted sales volumes, which can be driven by external factors affecting demand such as changes in consumer preferences, including changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and consumer responses to marketing and pricing strategy, (ii) changes in product costs, including commodities, (iii) interest rate fluctuations and (iv) currency fluctuations.
For the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company recorded a charge of $48.7 for the impairment of goodwill. The impairment charge related to the Refrigerated Retail segment and was primarily related to lost distribution with customers and a shift in supplier and consumer preferences to private label cheese products and away from branded cheese products.
The Company did not record a goodwill impairment charge at September 30, 2018, as all reporting units passed the quantitative impairment test.
For the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a charge of $26.5 for the impairment of goodwill. The impairment charge related to the Dymatize reporting unit which is included in the Active Nutrition segment. In fiscal 2017, consistent with the prior year, the specialty sports nutrition category, in which Dymatize sold the majority of its products, continued to experience weak sales, which resulted in management lowering its long-term expectations for the Dymatize reporting unit. After conducting step one of the impairment analysis, it was determined that the carrying value of the Dymatize reporting unit exceeded its fair value by $76.6, and the Company recorded an impairment charge for goodwill down to the fair value. At the time of the analysis, the Dymatize reporting unit had $26.5 of remaining goodwill, and therefore an impairment charge for the entire goodwill balance of $26.5 was recorded.
For the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company concluded there was no impairment of goodwill. With the exception of Dymatize, all reporting units passed step one of the impairment test. Dymatize failed step one and accordingly, step two of the analysis was performed as was required prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” in fiscal 2017. Based on the results of step two, it was determined that the fair value of the goodwill allocated to the Dymatize reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately $36.0 and was therefore not impaired as of September 30, 2016.
These fair value measurements fell within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as described in(see Note 15.15). The goodwill impairment losses are aggregated with trademark impairment losses in “Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
NOTE 8 — NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS, EQUITY INTERESTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
BellRing
As a result of the IPO on October 21, 2019 (see Note 1), the Company (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) owned 71.2% of the BellRing LLC units and one share of Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock has voting rights but no rights to dividends or other economic rights. For so long as the Company (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) directly owns more than 50% of the BellRing LLC units, the Class B Common Stock represents 67% of the combined voting power of the BellRing Common Stock, which provides the Company control over BellRing’s board of directors and results in the full consolidation of BellRing and its subsidiaries into the Company’s financial statements. The remaining interest in BellRing’s consolidated net income and net assets will be allocated to NCI. The BellRing LLC units held by the Company include a redemption feature that allows the Company to, at BellRing LLC’s option (as determined by its board of managers), redeem BellRing LLC units for either (i) Class A Common Stock of BellRing or (ii) cash equal to the market value of the BellRing Class A Common Stock at the time of redemption.
In the event the Company (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries) holds 50% or less of the BellRing LLC units, the holder of the share of Class B Common Stock will be entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of BellRing LLC units held by all persons other than BellRing and its subsidiaries. In such situation, the Company, as the holder of the share of Class B Common Stock, will only be entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of BellRing LLC units held by the Company (other than BellRing and its subsidiaries). Also, in such situation, if any BellRing LLC units are held by persons other than the Company, then the Company, as the holder of the share of Class B Common Stock, will cast the remainder of votes to which the share of Class B Common Stock is entitled only in accordance with the instructions and directions from such other holders of the BellRing LLC units.
As of September 30, 2020, the Company owned 71.2% of the BellRing LLC units and the net income and net assets of BellRing and its subsidiaries were consolidated within the Company’s financial statements, and the remaining 28.8% of the consolidated net income and net assets of BellRing and its subsidiaries, representing the percentage of economic interest in BellRing LLC held by BellRing (and therefore indirectly held by the public stockholders of BellRing through their ownership of the Class A Common Stock), were allocated to NCI.
The following table summarizes the effects of changes in ownership of BellRing on the Company’s equity:
| | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended September 30, 2020 |
| | | |
| | | |
| Increase in additional paid-in capital related to net proceeds from IPO | | | $ | 524.4 | |
| Increase in additional paid-in capital related to establishment of noncontrolling interest | | | 65.0 | |
| Decrease in additional paid-in capital related to tax effects of IPO | | | (133.8) | |
| Net transfers from noncontrolling interest | | | $ | 455.6 | |
| | | |
8th Avenue
In connection with its acquisition of the Weetabix Group in July 20178th Avenue Transactions (see Note 4)6), the Company acquiredhas a 60.5% common equity retained interest in 8th Avenue that is accounted for using the equity method. In determining the accounting treatment of the retained interest, management concluded that 8th Avenue was not a variable interest entity as defined by ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” and as such, 8th Avenue was evaluated under the voting interest model. Based on the terms of 8th Avenue’s governing documents, management determined that the Company does not have a controlling voting interest in 8th Avenue due to substantive participating rights held by a third party associated with the governance of 8th Avenue. However, the Company does retain significant influence, and therefore, the use of the equity method of accounting is required.
The following table presents the calculation of the Company’s equity method loss attributable to 8th Avenue:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| 8th Avenue’s net loss available to 8th Avenue’s common shareholders | $ | (38.9) | | | $ | (46.7) | |
| 60.5 | % | | 60.5 | % |
| Equity method loss available to Post | $ | (23.5) | | | $ | (28.3) | |
| Less: Amortization of basis difference, net of tax (a) | 6.9 | | | 8.8 | |
| Equity method loss, net of tax | $ | (30.4) | | | $ | (37.1) | |
(a)The Company adjusted the historical basis of 8th Avenue’s assets and liabilities to fair value and recognized a total basis difference of $70.3. The basis difference related to inventory of $2.0, net of tax, was included in equity method loss in the year ended September 30, 2019. The basis difference related to property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets is being amortized over the weighted average useful lives of the assets. At September 30, 2020 and 2019, the remaining basis difference to be amortized was $54.6 and $61.5, respectively.
Summarized financial information of 8th Avenue is presented in the following tables.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Net sales | $ | 924.2 | | | $ | 838.5 | |
| Gross profit | $ | 160.0 | | | $ | 139.6 | |
| | | |
| Net loss | $ | (6.4) | | | $ | (17.6) | |
| Less: Preferred stock dividend | 32.5 | | | 29.1 | |
| Net Loss Available to 8th Avenue Common Shareholders | $ | (38.9) | | | $ | (46.7) | |
| | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Current assets | $ | 251.5 | | | $ | 209.2 | |
| Other assets | 830.1 | | | 826.2 | |
| Total Assets | $ | 1,081.6 | | | $ | 1,035.4 | |
| | | |
| Current portion of long-term debt | $ | 5.2 | | | $ | 5.2 | |
| Accounts payable and other current liabilities | 113.3 | | | 74.4 | |
| Long-term debt | 663.3 | | | 644.9 | |
| Other liabilities | 71.6 | | | 76.5 | |
| Total Liabilities | 853.4 | | | 801.0 | |
| Preferred stock | 61.6 | | | 29.1 | |
| Other shareholders’ equity | 166.6 | | | 205.3 | |
| Shareholders’ Equity | 228.2 | | | 234.4 | |
| Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 1,081.6 | | | $ | 1,035.4 | |
Prior to the 8th Avenue Transactions, Post’s historical private brands business used certain functions and services performed by the Company. These functions and services included information systems, sales and marketing, procurement, accounting shared services, legal, tax, human resources, payroll and cash management. After the completion of the 8th Avenue Transactions, the Company continues to provide many of these services to 8th Avenue under a master services agreement (the “MSA”). In addition, Post and a third party each provide certain advisory services to 8th Avenue for a fee. During the years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded MSA and advisory income of $3.9 and $4.1, respectively, which was recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No such income was recorded in the year ended September 30, 2018.
During the years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had net sales to 8th Avenue of $5.7 and $4.7, respectively, and purchases from and royalties paid to 8th Avenue of $9.9 and $9.4, respectively. Sales and purchases between the Company and 8th Avenue were all made at arm’s-length. The investment in 8th Avenue was $110.1 and $140.5 at
September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and was included in “Equity method investments” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had current receivables, current payables and a long-term liability with 8th Avenue of $3.2, $0.6 and $0.7, respectively, at September 30, 2020, and current receivables, current payables and a long-term liability of $5.1, $0.6 and $0.7, respectively, at September 30, 2019. The current receivables, current payables and long-term liability, which related to the separation of 8th Avenue from the Company, MSA fees, pass through charges owed by 8th Avenue to the Company and related party sales and purchases, were included in “Receivables, net,” “Accounts payable” and “Other liabilities,” respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Alpen and Weetabix East Africa
The Company holds an equity interest in two2 legal entities, Alpen Food Company South Africa (Pty) Limited (“Alpen”) and Weetabix East Africa Limited (“Weetabix East Africa”). Results of both entities are reported in the Weetabix segment (see Note 22).
Alpen is a South African basedAfrican-based company that produces RTE cereal and muesli. The Company owns 50% of Alpen’s common stock with no other indicators of control and, accordingly, the Company accounts for its investment in Alpen using the equity method. The Company’s equity method (loss) earnings, net of tax attributable to Alpen was $(0.5), $0.1 and $(0.3) for the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was included in “Equity method loss, net of tax” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The investment in Alpen was $5.2$4.0 and $4.5$5.0 at September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively, and iswas included in “Other assets”“Equity method investments” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had a note receivable balance with Alpen of $1.0$0.5 and $1.0$0.5 at September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively, which iswas included in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Weetabix East Africa is a Kenyan basedKenyan-based company that produces RTE cereal and muesli. The Company owns 50.1% of Weetabix East Africa and holds a controlling voting and financial interest through its appointment of management and representation on Weetabix East Africa’s board of directors. Accordingly, Weetabix East Africa is fully consolidated into the Company’s consolidated financial statements.statements and its assets and results from operations are reported in the Weetabix East Africa had a long-term payable with Pioneer Food Group Limited, the owner of the remaining 49.9% of the business, of $0.5 at September 30, 2017, which is included in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. No such payable existed at September 30, 2018.segment (see Note 22).
NOTE 9 — INCOME TAXES
The components of “Earnings before Income Taxes and Equity Method Loss” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and other summary information is presented in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Domestic | $ | (36.4) | | | $ | 80.4 | | | $ | 289.0 | |
| Foreign | 99.8 | | | 78.7 | | | (24.3) | |
| Earnings before Income Taxes and Equity Method Loss | $ | 63.4 | | | $ | 159.1 | | | $ | 264.7 | |
| | | | | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 3.5 | | | $ | (3.9) | | | $ | (204.0) | |
| Effective income tax rate | 5.5 | % | | (2.5) | % | | (77.1) | % |
The expense (benefit) expense for income taxes consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Current: | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 31.3 | | | $ | 61.5 | | | $ | 27.3 | |
| State | 7.1 | | | 2.6 | | | 5.2 | |
| Foreign | 8.7 | | | 12.3 | | | 20.0 | |
| 47.1 | | | 76.4 | | | 52.5 | |
| Deferred: | | | | | |
| Federal | (45.6) | | | (61.8) | | | (253.5) | |
| State | (14.5) | | | (15.2) | | | 21.4 | |
| Foreign | 16.5 | | | (3.3) | | | (24.4) | |
| (43.6) | | | (80.3) | | | (256.5) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 3.5 | | | $ | (3.9) | | | $ | (204.0) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Current: | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 27.3 |
| | $ | (5.8 | ) | | $ | 37.6 |
|
| State | 5.2 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 1.7 |
|
| Foreign | 20.0 |
| | 10.2 |
| | 8.5 |
|
| | 52.5 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 47.8 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | |
| Federal | (253.5 | ) | | 19.7 |
| | (64.8 | ) |
| State | 21.4 |
| | 2.7 |
| | (7.5 | ) |
| Foreign | (24.4 | ) | | (5.0 | ) | | (2.3 | ) |
| | (256.5 | ) | | 17.4 |
| | (74.6 | ) |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (204.0 | ) | | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | (26.8 | ) |
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2018 was (77.1)% compared to 35.1% for fiscal 2017 and 89.0% for fiscal 2016. A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) expense with amounts computed at the statutory federal rate follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Computed tax (a) | $ | 13.3 | | | $ | 33.4 | | | $ | 64.9 | |
| Enacted tax law and changes, including the Tax Act (a) | (1.5) | | | (4.8) | | | (270.9) | |
| Non-deductible goodwill impairment loss | 0 | | | 6.9 | | | 0 | |
| Non-deductible compensation | 4.5 | | | 2.7 | | | 1.2 | |
| Transaction costs | (1.1) | | | 2.2 | | | 1.5 | |
| Domestic production activities deduction | 0 | | | 0 | | | (5.9) | |
| State income tax (benefit) expense, net of effect on federal tax | (4.3) | | | (0.7) | | | 5.6 | |
| Non-taxable interest income | 0 | | | 0 | | | (2.4) | |
| Valuation allowances | 5.0 | | | 6.6 | | | 4.1 | |
| Change in deferred tax rates | 11.1 | | | (4.6) | | | 0.3 | |
| Uncertain tax positions | 1.2 | | | (7.9) | | | 0.3 | |
| Net losses and basis difference attributable to equity method investment | (6.5) | | | 4.4 | | | 0 | |
| Income tax credits | (2.6) | | | (3.0) | | | (2.3) | |
| Rate differential on foreign income | (10.8) | | | (7.7) | | | (5.3) | |
| Excess tax benefits for share-based payments | (1.4) | | | (33.4) | | | (1.8) | |
| Gain on bargain purchase | (2.5) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Enhanced deduction for food donation | (1.5) | | | (0.6) | | | (0.8) | |
| Return-to-provision | (1.5) | | | 0.6 | | | (1.0) | |
| Other, net (none in excess of 5% of statutory tax) | 2.1 | | | 2.0 | | | 8.5 | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 3.5 | | | $ | (3.9) | | | $ | (204.0) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Computed tax (a) | $ | 64.9 |
| | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | (10.5 | ) |
| Enacted tax law and changes, including the Tax Act (a) | (270.9 | ) | | — |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Non-deductible goodwill impairment loss | — |
| | 7.2 |
| | — |
|
| Non-deductible compensation | 1.2 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 2.6 |
|
| Non-deductible transaction costs | 1.5 |
| | 2.9 |
| | — |
|
| Domestic production activities deduction | (5.9 | ) | | — |
| | (4.3 | ) |
| State income taxes, net of effect on federal tax | 5.6 |
| | 0.8 |
| | (6.2 | ) |
| Non-taxable interest income | (2.4 | ) | | (3.4 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
| Valuation allowances | 4.1 |
| | 4.8 |
| | 3.8 |
|
| Change in deferred tax rates | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | (2.0 | ) |
| Uncertain tax positions | 0.3 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
| Sale and liquidation of Michael Foods Canadian egg business | — |
| | — |
| | (3.6 | ) |
| Income tax credits | (2.3 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | (1.5 | ) |
| Rate differential on foreign income | (5.3 | ) | | (6.8 | ) | | (1.8 | ) |
| Excess tax benefits for share-based payments | (1.8 | ) | | (6.2 | ) | | — |
|
| Other, net (none in excess of 5% of statutory tax) | 6.7 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 0.6 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
| $ | (204.0 | ) | | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | (26.8 | ) |
| |
(a) | Fiscal 2018 federal corporate income tax was computed using a blended U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 24.5%. The fiscal 2018 tax rate was impacted by the Tax Act, as discussed below. Fiscal 2017 and 2016 federal corporate income tax was computed at the federal statutory rate of 35%. |
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Deferred tax non-current assets (liabilities) were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| Assets | | Liabilities | | Net | | Assets | | Liabilities | | Net |
| Derivative mark-to-market adjustments | $ | 133.8 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 133.8 | | | $ | 98.5 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 98.5 | |
| Disallowed interest carryforwards | 36.0 | | | — | | | 36.0 | | | 29.7 | | | — | | | 29.7 | |
| Net operating loss and credit carryforwards | 33.7 | | | — | | | 33.7 | | | 30.8 | | | — | | | 30.8 | |
| Lease liabilities | 26.2 | | | — | | | 26.2 | | | 0 | | | — | | | 0 | |
| Stock-based and deferred compensation | 18.4 | | | — | | | 18.4 | | | 19.9 | | | — | | | 19.9 | |
| Accrued vacation, incentive and severance | 8.3 | | | — | | | 8.3 | | | 7.7 | | | — | | | 7.7 | |
| Accrued liabilities | 9.0 | | | — | | | 9.0 | | | 15.6 | | | — | | | 15.6 | |
| Inventory | 3.2 | | | — | | | 3.2 | | | 6.2 | | | — | | | 6.2 | |
| Intangible assets | — | | | (619.9) | | | (619.9) | | | — | | | (652.4) | | | (652.4) | |
| Property | — | | | (192.3) | | | (192.3) | | | — | | | (173.4) | | | (173.4) | |
| Investment in partnership (a) | — | | | (144.6) | | | (144.6) | | | — | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| ROU assets | — | | | (25.5) | | | (25.5) | | | — | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Basis difference attributable to equity method investment | — | | | (22.5) | | | (22.5) | | | — | | | (30.0) | | | (30.0) | |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | — | | | (10.1) | | | (10.1) | | | — | | | (11.2) | | | (11.2) | |
| Other items | 4.6 | | | (1.7) | | | 2.9 | | | 4.5 | | | (1.8) | | | 2.7 | |
| Total gross deferred income taxes | 273.2 | | | (1,016.6) | | | (743.4) | | | 212.9 | | | (868.8) | | | (655.9) | |
| Valuation allowance | (41.1) | | | — | | | (41.1) | | | (32.6) | | | — | | | (32.6) | |
| Total deferred taxes | $ | 232.1 | | | $ | (1,016.6) | | | $ | (784.5) | | | $ | 180.3 | | | $ | (868.8) | | | $ | (688.5) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2018 | | September 30, 2017 |
| | Assets | | Liabilities | | Net | | Assets | | Liabilities | | Net |
| Accrued vacation, incentive and severance | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | 16.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16.2 |
|
| Inventory | 4.0 |
| | — |
| | 4.0 |
| | 3.0 |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
|
| Accrued liabilities | 24.3 |
| | — |
| | 24.3 |
| | 16.6 |
| | — |
| | 16.6 |
|
| Property | — |
| | (161.7 | ) | | (161.7 | ) | | — |
| | (210.1 | ) | | (210.1 | ) |
| Intangible assets | — |
| | (688.3 | ) | | (688.3 | ) | | — |
| | (882.5 | ) | | (882.5 | ) |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | — |
| | (15.3 | ) | | (15.3 | ) | | 5.3 |
| | — |
| | 5.3 |
|
| Stock-based and deferred compensation | 27.5 |
| | — |
| | 27.5 |
| | 28.7 |
| | — |
| | 28.7 |
|
| Derivative mark-to-market adjustments | 18.1 |
| | — |
| | 18.1 |
| | 91.9 |
| | — |
| | 91.9 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 27.2 |
| | — |
| | 27.2 |
| | 38.7 |
| | — |
| | 38.7 |
|
| Other items | 4.7 |
| | (3.2 | ) | | 1.5 |
| | 6.5 |
| | (1.6 | ) | | 4.9 |
|
| Total gross deferred income taxes | 115.8 |
| | (868.5 | ) | | (752.7 | ) | | 206.9 |
| | (1,094.2 | ) | | (887.3 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | (25.7 | ) | | — |
| | (25.7 | ) | | (18.5 | ) | | — |
| | (18.5 | ) |
| Total deferred taxes | $ | 90.1 |
| | $ | (868.5 | ) | | $ | (778.4 | ) | | $ | 188.4 |
| | $ | (1,094.2 | ) | | $ | (905.8 | ) |
As of September 30, 2018,2020, the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards totaling approximately $57.1,$41.8, which have expiration dates beginning in fiscal 2022 and extending through fiscal 2034, as well as state NOL carryforwards totaling approximately $576.4, which have expiration dates beginning in fiscal 2021 and extending through fiscal 2038, as well as state NOL carryforwards totaling approximately $475.0, which have expiration dates beginning in fiscal 2019 and extending through fiscal 2037.2040. As of September 30, 2018, Post2020, the Company had NOL carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions of $8.3.$12.7.
As certain of these NOLs and carryforwards were acquired through acquisitions, made during fiscal 2013, 2014, 2017 and 2018 as a result of ownership changes, the deductibility of the NOLs is subject to limitation under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) and similar limitations under state tax law. Giving consideration to IRC section 382 and state limitations, the Company believes it will generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the U.S. federal and certain state NOLs before they
expire. Approximately $16.6As of September 30, 2020, approximately $23.4 of the deferred tax asset related to the state NOLs has been offset by a valuation allowance based on management’s judgment that it is more likely than not that the benefits of those deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future.
At September 30, 2018, the Company hadNo provision has been made for income taxes on undistributed earnings of consolidated foreign subsidiaries of $6.2, and$118.2 at September 30, 2020, as it is the Company intendsCompany’s intention to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. In accordance withIt is not practicable to estimate the Taxadditional income taxes and applicable foreign withholding taxes that would be payable on the remittance of such undistributed earnings.
CARES Act
On March 27, 2020, the Company recorded a one-time transitionCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was enacted and signed into law. Certain provisions of the CARES Act impacted the Company’s accounting for income taxes, such as modifications to the limitation of business interest expense deductibility for tax on such earnings duringyears beginning in 2019 and 2020, and have been accounted for within the year ended September 30, 2018,2020. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures as discussed below.
Forits impact primarily related to immaterial short-term and long-term classifications on the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017Consolidated Balance Sheet and 2016, foreign (loss)current and deferred income before income taxes was $(24.3), $24.7 and $29.6, respectively.tax expense (benefit) classifications in the above table.
Tax Act
In fiscal 2018, the effective tax rate was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which was enacted on December 22, 2017. The SEC issued interpretive guidance regarding the Tax Act, which was codified by ASU 2018-05 in March 2018. The Tax Act resulted in significant impacts to the Company’s accounting for income taxes with the most significant of these impacts relating to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate, a one-time transition tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings and full expensing of certain qualified depreciable assets placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023. The Tax Act enactsenacted a new U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 21% that will fully gowent into effect for the Company’s fiscal 2019 tax year and iswas prorated with the pre-December 22, 2017 U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 35% for the Company’s current2018 tax year. This proration resulted in a blended U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 24.5% for fiscal 2018. AtDuring the time these financial statements were issued,year ended September 30, 2018, the Company had not completed the accounting for the tax effects related to the enactment of the Tax Act. However, provisional estimates were made in the following instances: (i) the Company remeasured its existing deferred tax assets and liabilities considering both the current fiscal year2018 blended rate and the 21% rate for future periods and recorded a provisional tax benefit of $281.2 and (ii) the Company calculated the one-time transition tax and recorded provisional tax expense of $10.3. Full expensing of certain depreciable assets will result in a temporary difference and will be analyzed as assets are placed in service.
The changes included During the year ended September 30, 2019, in connection with preparing its fiscal 2018 corporate income tax returns, the Tax Act are broadCompany recorded tax benefits related to the (i) re-measurement of its existing deferred tax assets and complex,liabilities and as such,(ii) adjustment to the finalone-time transition impactstax of the Tax Act may differ from the above estimates, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in current accounting standards for$0.2 and $4.6, respectively. No income taxes ortax adjustments were made related interpretations in response to the Tax Act or any updates or changesduring the year ended September 30, 2020. The Tax Act subjects U.S. corporations to estimatesa tax on global low-taxed income, which the Company has utilizedelected to calculaterecognize in the transition impacts, including impacts resulting from changes to current year earnings estimates and foreign exchange rates. ASU 2018-05 allows for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the Tax Act to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. The Company currently anticipates finalizing and recording any resulting adjustments by December 31, 2018.in which it is incurred.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The Company recognizes the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The tax benefits recognized from such positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. To the extent the Company’s assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate will be recorded in the period in which the determination is made.
Unrecognized tax benefits activity for the years ended September 30, 20182020, 2019 and 20172018 is presented in the following table:table.
| | | | | | September 30, |
| Unrecognized tax benefits, September 30, 2016 | | $ | 9.3 |
| |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance, beginning of year | | Balance, beginning of year | $ | 8.6 | | | $ | 9.9 | | | $ | 8.6 | |
| Additions for tax positions taken in current year and acquisitions | | — |
| Additions for tax positions taken in current year and acquisitions | 1.7 | | | 0.1 | | | 2.0 | |
| Reductions for tax positions taken in prior years | | — |
| |
| Settlements with tax authorities/statute expirations | | (0.7 | ) | |
| Unrecognized tax benefits, September 30, 2017 | | $ | 8.6 |
| |
| Additions for tax positions taken in current year and acquisitions | | 2.0 |
| |
| Reductions for tax positions taken in prior years | | (0.1 | ) | |
| Additions (reductions) for tax positions taken in prior years | | Additions (reductions) for tax positions taken in prior years | 0 | | | 5.7 | | | (0.1) | |
| Held for sale liabilities | | (0.6 | ) | Held for sale liabilities | 0 | | | 0 | | | (0.6) | |
| Settlements with tax authorities/statute expirations | | — |
| Settlements with tax authorities/statute expirations | (0.5) | | | (7.1) | | | 0 | |
| Unrecognized tax benefits, September 30, 2018 | | $ | 9.9 |
| |
| Balance, end of year | | Balance, end of year | $ | 9.8 | | | $ | 8.6 | | | $ | 9.9 | |
The amount of the net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would directly affect the effective tax rate is $8.3was $9.6 at September 30, 2018.2020. The Company believes that, due to expiring statutes of limitations and settlements with tax authorities, it is reasonably possible that the total unrecognized tax benefits may decrease up to approximately $7.0$1.8 within twelve months of the reporting date.
The Company computes tax-related interest and penalties as the difference between the tax position recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amount previously taken on the Company’s tax returns and classifies these amounts as components of
income tax (benefit) expense. The Company recorded $0.8, $0.3(benefit) expense of 0, $(2.5) and $(0.1)$0.8 related to interest and penalties in the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, 2017 and 2016.respectively. The Company had accrued interest and penalties of $3.5$1.0 and $2.7$1.0 at September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The accrued interest and penalties are not included in the table above.
U.S. federal, U.S. state and foreign jurisdictionsjurisdiction income tax returns for the tax years ended September 30, 2017, 20162015 through September 30, 2019 are generally open and 2015 are subject to examination by the tax authorities in each respective jurisdiction. During the year ended September 30, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service initiated an examination of the Company’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 U.S. federal income tax returns. The Company does not expect the examination will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
With respect to the Bob Evans acquisition, the Company assumed all income tax liabilities for those jurisdictions which remain subject to examination, primarily consisting of tax years ended April 20152017 through the short tax year ended January 11, 2018, the date of acquisition. With respect to the fiscal 2017 acquisition of the Weetabix Group, the Company assumed substantially all income tax liabilities for those jurisdictions which remain subject to examination. The Company did not assume any pre-acquisition tax liabilities related to the fiscal 2016 acquisition of WEF. With respect to the NPE acquisition made in fiscal 2017 and acquisitions made in fiscal 2015, the seller generally retained responsibility for all income tax liabilities through the date of acquisition. With respect to the Michael Foods acquisition, the Company assumed all income tax liabilities for those certain jurisdictions which remain subject to examination, consisting primarily of the short tax year ended June 2, 2014, the date of acquisition.
NOTE 10 — EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the average number of shares of common sharesstock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the average number of shares used for the basic earnings (loss) per share calculation, adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units using the “treasury stock” method. The impact of potentially dilutive convertible preferred stock is calculated using the “if-converted” method. ForIn addition, “Net earnings for diluted earnings per share” in the periods outstanding,table below has been adjusted for the Company’s tangible equity units (“TEUs”) (see Note 20) were assumed to be settled at the minimum settlement amountshare of 1.7114 shares per TEUBellRing’s consolidated net earnings for weighted-average shares for basicdiluted earnings per share. For diluted earnings (loss) per share, the TEUs, to the extent dilutive,it is dilutive.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company completed the redemption of its 2.5% Series C Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”). Substantially all of the 3.2 shares of Series C Preferred outstanding as of January 10, 2019, the date the Series C Preferred redemption was announced, were assumed to be settled at a conversion factor based on the daily volume-weighted-average price per shareconverted into 5.9 shares of the Company’s common stock notpursuant to exceed 2.0964the conversion rights applicable to the Series C Preferred, and the remaining shares per TEU. All TEU purchase contractsof Series C Preferred were settled as of June 1, 2017.redeemed. In the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company completed the redemption of its 3.75% Series B Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”). Substantially all of the 1.5 shares of Series B Preferred outstanding as of January 10, 2018, the date the redemption was announced, were converted into 3.1 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the conversion rights applicable to the Series B Preferred, and the remaining shares of Series B Preferred were redeemed (seeredeemed. For additional information on the Series C Preferred and Series B Preferred conversions, see Note 21).21.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net earnings (loss) for basic loss per share | $ | 457.3 |
| | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | (28.4 | ) |
| Dilutive preferred stock dividends | 10.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net earnings (loss) for diluted loss per share | $ | 467.3 |
| | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | (28.4 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Weighted-average shares outstanding | 66.6 |
| | 65.2 |
| | 63.9 |
|
| Effect of TEUs on weighted-average shares for basic earnings (loss) per share | — |
| | 2.6 |
| | 4.9 |
|
| Weighted-average shares for basic earnings (loss) per share | 66.6 |
| | 67.8 |
| | 68.8 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
| Stock options | 1.8 |
| | 1.8 |
| | — |
|
| Stock appreciation rights | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Restricted stock awards | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
|
| Preferred shares conversion to common | 7.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total dilutive securities | 9.3 |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
|
| Weighted-average shares for diluted earnings (loss) per share | 75.9 |
| | 69.9 |
| | 68.8 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Basic earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 6.87 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | (0.41 | ) |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 6.16 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | (0.41 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net earnings for basic earnings per share | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 121.7 | | | $ | 457.3 | |
| Dilutive impact of BellRing net earnings | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Dilutive preferred stock dividends | 0 | | | 3.0 | | | 10.0 | |
| Net earnings for diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 124.7 | | | $ | 467.3 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Weighted-average shares for basic earnings per share | 68.9 | | | 70.8 | | | 66.6 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
| Stock options | 0.6 | | | 1.6 | | | 1.8 | |
| Stock appreciation rights | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |
| Restricted stock units | 0.4 | | | 0.5 | | | 0.4 | |
| Performance-based restricted stock units | 0.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Preferred shares conversion to common | 0 | | | 2.1 | | | 7.0 | |
| Total dilutive securities | 1.2 | | | 4.3 | | | 9.3 | |
| Weighted-average shares for diluted earnings per share | 70.1 | | | 75.1 | | | 75.9 | |
| | | | | |
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 1.72 | | | $ | 6.87 | |
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 1.66 | | | $ | 6.16 | |
The following table details the securities that have been excluded from the calculation of weighted-average shares for diluted earnings (loss) per share as they were anti-dilutive.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Stock options | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.6 | |
| | | | | |
| Restricted stock units | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.1 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Performance-based restricted stock units | 0.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Stock options | 0.6 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 4.3 |
|
| Stock appreciation rights | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Restricted stock awards | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Preferred shares conversion to common | — |
| | 9.1 |
| | 9.1 |
|
NOTE 11 — SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Advertising and promotion expenses (a) | $ | 146.0 | | | $ | 122.3 | | | $ | 153.4 | |
| Repair and maintenance expenses | 140.0 | | | 156.9 | | | 149.1 | |
| Research and development expenses | 28.5 | | | 25.0 | | | 25.1 | |
| | | | | |
| Interest income | (6.3) | | | (7.9) | | | (7.4) | |
| Interest paid | 348.8 | | | 344.4 | | | 373.9 | |
| Income taxes paid | 54.4 | | | 65.0 | | | 23.0 | |
| Accrued additions to property | 29.8 | | | 24.7 | | | 30.4 | |
(a)As a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-09, certain payments to customers totaling $23.7 in the year ended September 30, 2019 previously classified as advertising and promotion expenses were classified as net sales. For additional information, see Note 2.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Advertising and promotion expenses | $ | 153.4 |
| | $ | 159.7 |
| | $ | 184.2 |
|
| Repair and maintenance expenses | 149.1 |
| | 162.6 |
| | 141.6 |
|
| Research and development expenses | 25.1 |
| | 18.6 |
| | 16.3 |
|
| Rent expense | 41.3 |
| | 41.8 |
| | 32.0 |
|
| Interest income | (7.4 | ) | | (6.8 | ) | | (2.7 | ) |
| Interest paid | 373.9 |
| | 333.6 |
| | 309.6 |
|
| Income taxes paid | 23.0 |
| | 29.6 |
| | 73.4 |
|
| Accrued additions to property | 30.4 |
| | 21.0 |
| | 12.7 |
|
NOTE 12 — SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Receivables, net | | | |
| Trade | $ | 395.4 | | | $ | 407.8 | |
| Income tax receivable | 26.6 | | | 21.9 | |
| Related party | 3.2 | | | 5.1 | |
| Other | 19.8 | | | 12.3 | |
| 445.0 | | | 447.1 | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | (3.4) | | | (2.0) | |
| $ | 441.6 | | | $ | 445.1 | |
| Inventories | | | |
| Raw materials and supplies | $ | 118.1 | | | $ | 99.4 | |
| Work in process | 17.8 | | | 19.4 | |
| Finished products | 429.4 | | | 425.4 | |
| Flocks | 34.1 | | | 35.6 | |
| $ | 599.4 | | | $ | 579.8 | |
| Other Assets | | | |
| Pension asset | $ | 159.0 | | | $ | 166.7 | |
| Operating ROU Assets | 116.3 | | | 0 | |
| Equity securities | 27.9 | | | 0 | |
| | | |
| Other | 25.8 | | | 38.8 | |
| $ | 329.0 | | | $ | 205.5 | |
| Accounts Payable | | | |
| Trade | $ | 357.6 | | | $ | 349.6 | |
| Book cash overdrafts | 0.7 | | | 35.1 | |
| Other | 9.6 | | | 10.9 | |
| $ | 367.9 | | | $ | 395.6 | |
| Other Current Liabilities | | | |
| Advertising and promotion | $ | 44.9 | | | $ | 45.2 | |
| Accrued interest | 85.9 | | | 46.0 | |
| Accrued compensation | 98.5 | | | 85.3 | |
| Hedging liabilities | 187.9 | | | 87.6 | |
| Operating lease liabilities - current | 23.6 | | | — | |
| Accrued legal settlements | 13.2 | | | 16.1 | |
| | | |
| Accrued appraisal rights and related interest | 0 | | | 19.1 | |
| Other | 87.6 | | | 94.5 | |
| $ | 541.6 | | | $ | 393.8 | |
| Other Liabilities | | | |
| Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations | $ | 77.7 | | | $ | 66.0 | |
| Hedging liabilities - non-current | 355.2 | | | 330.5 | |
| Accrued compensation - non-current | 30.2 | | | 34.0 | |
| Operating lease liabilities - non-current | 103.0 | | | 0 | |
| Other | 33.7 | | | 26.4 | |
| $ | 599.8 | | | $ | 456.9 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Receivables, net | | | |
| Trade | $ | 412.8 |
| | $ | 421.6 |
|
| Income tax receivable | 41.5 |
| | 46.4 |
|
| Other | 10.3 |
| | 14.2 |
|
| | 464.6 |
| | 482.2 |
|
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | (2.3 | ) | | (1.6 | ) |
| | $ | 462.3 |
| | $ | 480.6 |
|
| Inventories | | | |
| Raw materials and supplies | $ | 107.8 |
| | $ | 129.8 |
|
| Work in process | 17.8 |
| | 16.9 |
|
| Finished products | 324.1 |
| | 395.6 |
|
| Flocks | 34.5 |
| | 31.2 |
|
| | $ | 484.2 |
| | $ | 573.5 |
|
| Other Assets | | | |
| Pension asset | $ | 167.0 |
| | $ | 154.6 |
|
| Hedging assets - non-current | 52.0 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Other | 33.0 |
| | 29.4 |
|
| | $ | 252.0 |
| | $ | 184.3 |
|
| Accounts Payable | | | |
| Trade | $ | 329.3 |
| | $ | 306.5 |
|
| Book cash overdrafts | 26.7 |
| | 17.8 |
|
| Other | 9.1 |
| | 11.7 |
|
| | $ | 365.1 |
| | $ | 336.0 |
|
| Other Current Liabilities | | | |
| Advertising and promotion | $ | 53.6 |
| | $ | 74.5 |
|
| Accrued interest | 38.5 |
| | 36.5 |
|
| Accrued compensation | 114.2 |
| | 89.9 |
|
| Hedging liabilities | 27.7 |
| | 54.6 |
|
| Accrued legal settlements | 23.9 |
| | 8.6 |
|
| Other | 81.4 |
| | 82.2 |
|
| | $ | 339.3 |
| | $ | 346.3 |
|
| Other Liabilities | | | |
| Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations | $ | 53.3 |
| | $ | 83.5 |
|
| Hedging liabilities - non-current | 113.7 |
| | 188.9 |
|
| Accrued compensation - non-current | 30.4 |
| | 29.2 |
|
| Accrued appraisal rights and related interest | 267.0 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 34.9 |
| | 26.2 |
|
| | $ | 499.3 |
| | $ | 327.8 |
|
NOTE 13 — ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS | | | | September 30, | | September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | 2.3 | | | $ | 1.6 | |
| Provision charged to expense | 0.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 1.2 |
| Provision charged to expense | 3.3 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |
| Write-offs, less recoveries | (1.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | Write-offs, less recoveries | (1.9) | | | (0.4) | | | (1.2) | |
| Held for sale assets | (0.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| Held for sale assets | 0 | | | 0 | | | (0.5) | |
| Other (a) | 2.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Other (a) | 0 | | | 0 | | | 2.3 | |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 2.3 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 3.4 | | | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | 2.3 | |
| |
(a) | Other items are primarily related to acquisitions. |
(a)Other items are primarily related to acquisitions.
NOTE 14 — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to commodity price risks relating to the acquisitionpurchases of raw materials, energy and fuel and supplies, interest rate risks relating to floating rate debt and foreign currency exchange rate risks. The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments, including (but not limited to) futures contracts, option contracts, forward contracts and swaps, to manage certain of these exposures by hedging when it is practical to do so. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
At September 30, 2018,2020, the Company’s derivative instruments, consisted of:
Notnone of which were designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” consisted of:
Commodity•commodity and energy futures, swaps and option contracts which relate to inputs that generally will be utilized within the next year;two years;
•foreign currency forward contracts maturing withinin the next year that have the effect of hedging currency fluctuations between the Euro and the Pound Sterling and the U.S. Dollar;Dollar and the Pound Sterling;
a pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swap maturing in May 2021 that requires monthly settlements and has the effect of hedging interest payments on debt expected to be issued but not yet priced; and
rate-lock •interest rate swaps that require five lump sum settlements with the first settlement occurring in July 2019 and the last in July 2021 and have the effect of hedging interest payments on debt expected to be issued but not yet priced.priced, including:
Designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815
Pay-fixed, receive-fixed cross-currency swaps with maturities in January 2021 and July 2022 that require quarterly cash settlements and are used as net investment hedges of the Company’s investment in the Weetabix Group, which is denominated in Pounds Sterling; and
a •pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swapswaps maturing in May 2021 and May 2024 that requiresrequire monthly settlements;
•rate-lock interest rate swaps that require nine lump sum settlements with the first settlement occurring in July 2021 and the last in July 2026; and
•interest rate swaps that mature in July 2021 and give the Company the option of pay-variable, receive-fixed lump sum settlements; and
•pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps maturing in December 2022 that require monthly settlements and is used ashave the effect of hedging forecasted interest payments on BellRing’s variable rate debt.
Interest rate swaps
Fiscal 2020
In the first quarter of fiscal 2020, contemporaneously with the repayment of its term loan, the Company changed the designation of one of its interest rate swap contracts from a cash flow hedge to a non-designated hedging instrument. In connection with the de-designation, the Company reclassified losses previously recorded in accumulated OCI of $7.2 to “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2020.
As of April 1, 2020, the Company changed the designation of its interest rate swap contracts that are used as hedges of forecasted interest payments on the Company’sBellRing’s variable rate debt from cash flow hedges to non-designated hedging instruments as the swaps were no longer effective (as defined by ASC Topic 815). In connection with the de-designation, the Company started reclassifying losses previously recorded in accumulated OCI to “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the term loan (see Note 16).of BellRing’s variable rate debt. Mark-to-market adjustments related to these swaps also will be included in “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At September 30, 2020, the remaining net loss before taxes to be amortized was $9.4.
AsFiscal 2019
In the first quarter of January 1,fiscal 2019, the Company terminated $800.0 notional value of its interest rate swap contracts that were designated as hedging instruments. In connection with the interest rate swap terminations, the Company received cash proceeds of $29.8, and reclassified previously recorded gains from accumulated OCI to “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2019.
Cross-currency swaps
The Company terminated $448.7 and $214.2 notional value of its cross-currency swap contracts that were designated as hedging instruments during the second quarter of fiscal 2020 and the first quarter of fiscal 2019, respectively. In connection with these terminations, the Company received cash proceeds of $50.3 during the year ended September 30, 2020 and $26.2 during the year ended September 30, 2019, both of which were recorded to accumulated OCI. Reclassification of amounts recorded in accumulated OCI into earnings will only occur in the event U.K.-based operations are substantially liquidated.
Foreign currency forward contracts
In the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company changed the designation of its foreign currency forward contracts from a cash flow hedge to a non-designated hedging instrument. In connection with the new designation, the Company reclassified gains previously recorded in accumulated OCI of $1.8, of which $1.3 was reclassified to “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2018 and $0.5 was reclassified to “Property, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2018.
As of July 1, 2017, the Company changed the designation of its cross-currency swap contracts from a non-designated hedging instrument to a net investment hedge. Prior to its designation as a net investment hedge, the Company had reported non-cash mark-to-market adjustments related to the cross-currency swaps in “(Income) expense on swaps, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table shows the notional amounts of derivative instruments held.
| | | | | September 30,
2018 | | September 30,
2017 | | September 30,
2020 | | September 30,
2019 |
| Not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815: | | | | | Not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815: | | | | |
| Commodity contracts | | $ | 64.3 |
| | $ | 53.8 |
| Commodity contracts | | $ | 24.7 | | | $ | 47.1 | |
| Energy contracts | | 20.8 |
| | 25.6 |
| Energy contracts | | 87.1 | | | 39.8 | |
| Foreign exchange contracts - Forward contracts | | 9.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| Foreign exchange contracts - Forward contracts | | 28.9 | | | 0 | |
| Interest rate swap | | 74.6 |
| | 76.1 |
| Interest rate swap | | 621.7 | | | 73.1 | |
| Interest rate swaps - Rate-lock swaps | | 1,649.3 |
| | 1,649.3 |
| Interest rate swaps - Rate-lock swaps | | 1,666.0 | | | 1,531.0 | |
| Interest rate swaps - Options | | Interest rate swaps - Options | | 433.3 | | | 0 | |
| Designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815: | | | | | Designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815: | |
| Foreign exchange contracts - Forward contracts | | — |
| | 20.9 |
| |
| | Foreign exchange contracts - Cross-currency swaps | | 662.9 |
| | 448.7 |
| Foreign exchange contracts - Cross-currency swaps | | 0 | | | 448.7 | |
| Interest rate swap | | 1,000.0 |
| | 1,000.0 |
| Interest rate swap | | 0 | | | 200.0 | |
The following tables presenttable presents the balance sheet location and fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments, on a gross and net basis as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, along with the portion designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815. The Company does not offset derivative assets and liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
| | | | | Fair Value | | Portion Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Fair Value | | Portion Designated as Hedging Instruments |
| | | Balance Sheet Location | | September 30,
2018 | | September 30,
2017 | | September 30,
2018 | | September 30,
2017 | | Balance Sheet Location | | September 30,
2020 | | September 30,
2019 | | September 30,
2020 | | September 30,
2019 |
| Asset Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | Asset Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commodity contracts | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 1.9 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Commodity contracts | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 5.0 | | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Energy contracts | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 4.9 |
| | 3.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Energy contracts | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 1.8 | | | 0.7 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Commodity contracts | | Other assets | | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Commodity contracts | | Other assets | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Energy contracts | | Other assets | | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Energy contracts | | Other assets | | 0.9 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 1.2 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 1.1 |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 0.1 | | | 1.3 | | | 0 | | | 1.3 | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Other assets | | 17.6 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 0.3 |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Other assets | | 0 | | | 19.2 | | | 0 | | | 19.2 | |
| Interest rate swaps | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 6.4 |
| | — |
| | 6.4 |
| | — |
| Interest rate swaps | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 6.8 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Interest rate swaps | | Other assets | | 33.9 |
| | — |
| | 30.6 |
| | — |
| |
| | | | $ | 66.4 |
| | $ | 5.9 |
| | $ | 55.7 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
| | $ | 14.7 | | | $ | 23.2 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 20.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Liability Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | Liability Derivatives: | |
| Commodity contracts | | Other current liabilities | | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 1.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Commodity contracts | | Other current liabilities | | $ | 1.4 | | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Energy contracts | | Other current liabilities | | 0.4 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| Energy contracts | | Other current liabilities | | 10.1 | | | 1.5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Other current liabilities | | 1.5 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 1.5 |
| |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Other liabilities | | 19.4 |
| | 23.6 |
| | 19.4 |
| | 23.6 |
| |
| Energy contracts | | Energy contracts | | Other liabilities | | 3.9 | | | 0.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | Interest rate swaps | | Other current liabilities | | 23.6 |
| | 50.9 |
| | — |
| | 0.7 |
| Interest rate swaps | | Other current liabilities | | 176.4 | | | 85.1 | | | 0 | | | 1.6 | |
| Interest rate swaps | | Other liabilities | | 94.3 |
| | 165.3 |
| | — |
| | 4.2 |
| Interest rate swaps | | Other liabilities | | 351.3 | | | 330.4 | | | 0 | | | 6.2 | |
| | | $ | 141.4 |
| | $ | 243.5 |
| | $ | 20.8 |
| | $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | 543.1 | | | $ | 418.1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 7.8 | |
The following tables present the effects of the Company’s derivative instruments on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) forIncome.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Statement of Operations Location | | Loss (Gain) Recognized in Statement of Operations |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Commodity contracts | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 3.8 | | | $ | 2.8 | | | $ | 4.0 | |
| Energy contracts | | Cost of goods sold | | 21.6 | | | 5.0 | | | (6.4) | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | (0.1) | | | 0 | | | 1.5 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate swaps | | Interest expense, net | | 3.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Interest rate swaps | | Expense (income) on swaps, net | | 187.1 | | | 306.6 | | | (95.6) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Loss (Gain) Recognized in OCI including NCI | | Loss (Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI including NCI into Earnings (a) | | Statement of Operations Location |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (0.2) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (1.3) | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| Interest rate swaps | | 9.7 | | | 13.8 | | | (44.2) | | | 8.2 | | | (31.0) | | | (2.3) | | | Interest expense, net |
| Cross-currency swaps | | (32.2) | | | (54.3) | | | (27.8) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | Expense (income) on swaps, net |
(a)For the yearsyear ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, this amount includes the reclassification of previously unrealized net losses on interest rate swaps that were de-designated as hedging instruments in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, as well as the amortization of previously unrealized losses on BellRing’s interest rate swaps that were de-designated as hedging instruments as of April 1, 2020.
The following table presents the components of the Company’s net hedging losses (gains) on interest rate swaps, which are included in “Interest expense, net” and 2016.“Expense on swaps, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Statement of Operations Location | | Loss (Gain) Recognized in Statement of Operations |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Commodity contracts | | Cost of goods sold | | $ | 4.0 |
| | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | 7.5 |
|
| Energy contracts | | Cost of goods sold | | (6.4 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | | 1.2 |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 1.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | | (Income) expense on swaps, net | | — |
| | 10.3 |
| | — |
|
| Interest rate swaps | | (Income) expense on swaps, net | | (95.6 | ) | | (102.1 | ) | | 182.9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended
September 30, | | Statement of Operations Location | | Mark-to-Market Loss (a) | | Cash Settlements Paid (Received), Net (b) | | Net Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI including NCI (c) |
| | Interest expense, net | | $ | (0.2) | | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 8.4 | |
| | Expense on swaps, net | | 117.4 | | | 69.7 | | | 0 | |
| 2020 | | Total | | $ | 117.2 | | | $ | 71.5 | | | $ | 8.4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Interest expense, net | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (31.0) | | | $ | 0 | |
| | Expense on swaps, net | | 293.1 | | | 13.5 | | | 0 | |
| 2019 | | Total | | $ | 293.1 | | | $ | (17.5) | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Interest expense, net | | $ | 0 | | | $ | (2.3) | | | $ | 0 | |
| | Expense on swaps, net | | (96.7) | | | 1.1 | | | 0 | |
| 2018 | | Total | | $ | (96.7) | | | $ | (1.2) | | | $ | 0 | |
(a)Includes non-cash adjustments related to interest rate swaps that were not designated as hedging instruments. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments | | (Gain) Loss Recognized in OCI | | (Gain) Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Earnings | | Statement of Operations Location |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (1.6 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1.3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| Interest rate swaps | | (44.2 | ) | | 5.6 |
| | — |
| | (2.3 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | — |
| | Interest expense, net |
| Cross-currency swaps | | (27.8 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (Income) expense on swaps, net |
(c)Includes the reclassification of previously unrealized losses on interest rate swaps that were de-designated as hedging instruments, as well as the amortization of previously unrealized losses on BellRing’s interest rate swaps over the term of the related debt that were de-designated as hedging instruments.
Accumulated OCI, including amounts reported as NCI, included a $50.0$90.2 net gain on hedging instruments before taxes ($37.467.9 after taxes) at September 30, 2018,2020, compared to a $18.1$59.5 net lossgain before taxes ($11.144.5 after taxes) at September 30, 2017.2019. Approximately $6.4$2.3 of the net cash flow hedge gainshedging losses reported in accumulated OCI at September 30, 2018 is2020 are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. ForAccumulated OCI included settlements of and previously unrealized gains or losses associatedon cross-currency swaps of $99.5 and $36.5 at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In connection with interest ratethe settlements and terminations of cross-currency swaps, the reclassification will occur over the term of the related debt. A reclassification ofCompany recognized gains and losses reported in accumulated OCI related toof $63.0, $31.7 and $4.8 during the cross-currency swapsyears ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Reclassification of amounts recorded in accumulated OCI into earnings will only occur in the event all United Kingdom-basedU.K.-based operations are substantially liquidated. At September 30, 2018, accumulated OCI included settlements of cross-currency swaps of $4.8. There were no settlements of cross-currency swaps included in accumulated OCI at September 30, 2017.
At September 30, 20182020 and September 30, 2017,2019, the Company had pledged collateral of $4.5$5.3 and $2.9,$3.7, respectively, related to its commodity and energy contracts. These amounts arewere classified as “Restricted cash” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 15 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table presents the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the basis for that measurement according to the levels in the fair value hierarchy in ASC Topic 820:820, “Fair Value Measurement.”
| | | | September 30, 2018 | | September 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred compensation investment | $ | 43.6 |
| | $ | 43.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15.4 |
| | $ | 15.4 |
| | $ | — |
| Deferred compensation investment | $ | 12.8 | | | $ | 12.8 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 11.2 | | | $ | 11.2 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Derivative assets | 66.4 |
| | — |
| | 66.4 |
| | 5.9 |
| | — |
| | 5.9 |
| Derivative assets | 14.7 | | | 0 | | | 14.7 | | | 23.2 | | | 0 | | | 23.2 | |
| Equity securities | | Equity securities | 27.9 | | | 27.9 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | $ | 110.0 |
| | $ | 43.6 |
| | $ | 66.4 |
| | $ | 21.3 |
| | $ | 15.4 |
| | $ | 5.9 |
| | $ | 55.4 | | | $ | 40.7 | | | $ | 14.7 | | | $ | 34.4 | | | $ | 11.2 | | | $ | 23.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities | |
| Deferred compensation liabilities | $ | 52.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 52.2 |
| | $ | 22.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 22.5 |
| Deferred compensation liabilities | $ | 29.7 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 29.7 | | | $ | 31.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 31.0 | |
| Derivative liabilities | 141.4 |
| | — |
| | 141.4 |
| | 243.5 |
| | — |
| | 243.5 |
| Derivative liabilities | 543.1 | | | 0 | | | 543.1 | | | 418.1 | | | 0 | | | 418.1 | |
| | $ | 193.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 193.6 |
| | $ | 266.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 266.0 |
| | $ | 572.8 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 572.8 | | | $ | 449.1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 449.1 | |
The deferred compensation investment isinvestments are primarily invested in mutual funds, and itsthe fair value is measured using the market approach. This investment isThese investments are in the same funds, or funds that employ a similar investment strategy, and are purchased in substantially the same amounts, as the
participants’ selected investment options (excluding Post common stock equivalents), which represent the underlying liabilities to participants in the Company’s deferred compensation plans. Deferred compensation liabilities are recorded at amounts due to participants in cash, based on the fair value of participants’ selected investment options (excluding certain Post common stock equivalents to be distributed in shares) using the market approach. In connection with the acquisition of Bob Evans (see Note 4), the Company expects to pay $24.1 related to the termination of Bob Evans’s deferred compensation plans within the next 12 months.
The Company utilizes the income approach to measure fair value for its commodity and energy derivatives. The income approach uses pricing models that rely on market observable inputs such as yield curves and forward prices. Foreign exchange contracts are valued using the spot rate less the forward rate multiplied by the notional amount. The Company’s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve. Refer to Note 14 for the classification of changes in fair value of derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company uses the market approach to measure the fair value of its equity securities.
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities also include cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable for which the carrying value approximates fair value due to their short maturities (less than 12 months). The Company does not record its short-termcurrent portion of long-term debt and long-term debt at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the outstanding borrowings under the municipal bond and BellRing’s Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 17) as of September 30, 2020 approximated its carrying value. Based on current market rates, the fair value of the Company’s debt, (Levelexcluding outstanding borrowings under the municipal bond and BellRing’s Revolving Credit Facility (both of which are categorized as Level 2), including amounts classified as held for sale, was $7,790.97,277.8 and $7,343.4$7,412.0 as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and assets held for sale, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
In the year ended September 30, 2020, no impairment charge was recorded for goodwill or definite-lived or indefinite-lived intangibles. In the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company recorded goodwill and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $63.3. In the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $124.9. In the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded goodwill impairment losses of $26.5. There were no such charges recorded in the year ended September 30, 2016. These losses were recorded as “Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets” in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations. For additional information on other intangiblesintangible assets and goodwill, see Note 2 and Note 7, respectively. There were no other fair value measurement losses recognized during the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.2020, 2019 or 2018.
As stated previously (see Note 6),At September 30, 2020, the Company had assetsland and liabilities held for sale related to the 8th Avenue Transactions and a building related to the planned closure of the Company’s Post Consumer Brands cereal warehouse in Clinton, Massachusettsbuildings classified as of September 30, 2018, and assets held for sale related to the September 2015 closureclosures of the Company’s Dymatize manufacturing facility located in Farmers Branch, TexasClinton Plant, Asheboro Facility and Corby Facility. At September 30, 2019, the April 2013 closureCompany had land and buildings classified as assets held for sale related to the closures of the Company’s cereal plant locatedClinton Plant and Asheboro Facility. The Company sold a portion of the Clinton Plant in Modesto, California as ofMarch 2020. The Clinton Plant and the Asheboro Facility are both reported in the Company’s Post Consumer Brands segment, and the Corby Facility is reported in the Company’s Weetabix segment. In the year ended September 30, 2016.2020, the book value of the land related to the Corby Facility was lower than fair value; therefore, no fair value adjustment was recorded to the assets that were classified as held for sale. On October 1, 2018, the Company completed the 8th Avenue Transactions, and in November 2018, the Post Consumer Brands cereal warehouse was sold in connection with the closure of its Clinton Facility. For additional information on assets and liabilities held for sale, see Note 6. The fair value of assets and liabilities held for sale werewas measured at fair value on a nonrecurringnon-recurring basis based on the lower of book value or third-party valuations.third party data. When applicable, the fair value is adjusted to reflect an offer to purchase the assets and liabilities. The fair value measurement was categorized as Level 3, as the fair values utilize significant unobservable inputs. The following table summarizes the Level 3 activity.
| | | | | |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | $ | 290.9 | |
| |
| Gains related to assets and liabilities held for sale | 124.6 | |
| Proceeds from the sale of assets and liabilities held for sale | (276.6) | |
| Investment in 8th Avenue, working capital and other adjustments | (138.9) | |
| |
| Transfers of assets into held for sale | 9.9 | |
| Balance, September 30, 2019 | $ | 9.9 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Losses related to assets held for sale | (2.7) | |
| Proceeds from the sale of assets held for sale | (2.4) | |
| |
| Transfer of assets into held for sale | 2.5 | |
| Balance, September 30, 2020 | $ | 7.3 | |
|
| | | |
| Balance, September 30, 2016 | $ | 10.1 |
|
| Gain on assets held for sale | 0.2 |
|
| Proceeds from the sale of assets held for sale | (10.3 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2017 | $ | — |
|
| Transfers of assets into held for sale | 1,051.6 |
|
| Transfers of liabilities into held for sale | (760.7 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2018 | $ | 290.9 |
|
NOTE 16 — LEASES
In conjunction with the adoption of ASUs 2016-02 and 2018-11 (see Note 3), the Company updated its policy for recognizing leases under ASC Topic 842. The Company assessed the impact of these ASUs by reviewing its lease portfolio, implementing lease accounting software, developing related business processes and implementing internal controls. A summary of the updated policy is included below. Prior to October 1, 2019, the Company accounted for leases under ASC Topic 840, “Leases.”
Lease Portfolio
The Company leases office space, certain warehouses and equipment primarily through operating lease agreements. The Company has no material finance lease agreements. Leases have remaining terms which range from 1 to 56 years and most leases provide the Company with the option to exercise one or more renewal terms.
Lease Policy
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at its inception. When the arrangements include lease and non-lease components, the Company accounts for them as a single lease component. Leases with an initial term of less than 12 months are not reported on the balance sheet, but rather are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Arrangements may include options to extend or terminate the lease arrangement. These options are included in the lease term used to establish ROU assets and lease liabilities when it is reasonably certain they will be exercised. The Company will reassess expected lease terms based on changes in circumstances that indicate options may be more or less likely to be exercised.
The Company has certain lease arrangements that include variable rental payments. The future variability of these payments and adjustments are unknown and therefore are not included in minimum rental payments used to determine ROU assets and lease liabilities. The Company has lease arrangements where it makes separate payments to the lessor based on the lessor’s common area maintenance expenses, property and casualty insurance costs, property taxes assessed on the property and other variable expenses. As the Company has elected the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components, these variable amounts are captured in operating lease expense in the period in which they are incurred. Variable rental payments are recognized in the period in which their associated obligation is incurred.
As most of the Company’s lease arrangements do not provide an implicit interest rate, an incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) is applied in determining the present value of future payments. The Company’s IBR is selected based upon information available at the lease commencement date.
ROU assets are recorded as “Other assets” and lease liabilities are recorded as “Other current liabilities” and “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in either “Cost of goods sold” or “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Costs associated with finance leases and lease income do not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Impact of Adoption
The Company utilized the cumulative effect adjustment method of adoption and, accordingly, recorded ROU assets and lease liabilities of $158.1 and $168.2, respectively, on the balance sheet at October 1, 2019. The Company elected the following practical expedients in accordance with ASC Topic 842:
•Reassessment elections — The Company elected the package of practical expedients, and did not reassess whether any existing contracts are or contain a lease, provided a lease analysis was conducted under ASC Topic 840. To the extent leases were identified under ASC Topic 840, the Company did not reassess the classification of those leases. Additionally, to the extent initial direct costs were capitalized under ASC Topic 840 and are not amortized as a result of the implementation of ASC Topic 842, they were not reassessed.
•Short-term lease election — ASC Topic 842 allows lessees an option to not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities arising from short-term leases. A short-term lease is defined as a lease with an initial term of 12 months or less. The Company elected to not recognize short-term leases as ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. All short-term leases which are not included on the Company’s balance sheet will be recognized within lease expense. Leases that have an initial term of 12 months or less with an option for renewal will need to be assessed in order to determine if the lease qualifies for the short-term lease exception. If the option is reasonably certain to be exercised, the lease does not qualify as a short-term lease.
•Lease vs non-lease components — The Company elected to combine lease and non-lease components as a single component and the total consideration for the arrangements was accounted for as a lease.
The following table presents the balance sheet location of the Company’s operating leases.
| | | | | |
| September 30, 2020 |
| ROU assets: | |
| Other assets | $ | 116.3 | |
| |
| Lease liabilities: | |
| Other current liabilities | $ | 23.6 | |
| Other liabilities | 103.0 | |
| Total lease liabilities | $ | 126.6 | |
The following table presents maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of September 30, 2020, presented under ASC Topic 842.
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2020 | | |
| Fiscal 2021 | $ | 28.7 | | | |
| Fiscal 2022 | 27.7 | | | |
| Fiscal 2023 | 24.4 | | | |
| Fiscal 2024 | 17.7 | | | |
| Fiscal 2025 | 11.9 | | | |
| Thereafter | 39.9 | | | |
| Total future minimum payments | $ | 150.3 | | | |
| Less: Implied interest | 23.7 | | | |
| Total lease liabilities | $ | 126.6 | | | |
The following table presents future minimum rental payments under the Company’s noncancelable operating lease agreements as of September 30, 2019, presented under ASC Topic 840.
| | | | | |
| September 30,
2019 |
| Fiscal 2020 | $ | 28.3 | |
| Fiscal 2021 | 29.0 | |
| Fiscal 2022 | 28.1 | |
| Fiscal 2023 | 25.4 | |
| Fiscal 2024 | 19.2 | |
| Thereafter | 77.3 | |
| Total future minimum payments (a) | $ | 207.3 | |
(a)Future minimum payments as of September 30, 2019 included $36.0 related to a real estate lease, consisting of land and a building, that was purchased by the Company in December 2019 and the Company de-recognized both a ROU asset and lease liability of $23.1 and recognized the assets as property on the balance sheet.
As reported under ASC Topic 842, operating lease expense for the year ended September 30, 2020 was $42.0. Of the total operating lease expense incurred during the year ended September 30, 2020, $5.1 related to variable lease costs and $7.5 related to short-term lease costs. As reported under ASC Topic 840, rent expense during the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $40.1 and $41.3, respectively. Operating cash flows for amounts included in the measurement of the Company’s operating lease liabilities for the year ended September 30, 2020 were $29.6. ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities during the year ended September 30, 2020 were $5.6. The weighted average remaining lease term of the Company’s operating leases as of September 30, 2020 was approximately 7 years and the weighted average IBR was 4.4% as of September 30, 2020.
NOTE 17 — LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt as of the dates indicated consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| 5.625% Senior Notes maturing January 2028 | $ | 960.9 |
| | $ | — |
|
| 5.50% Senior Notes maturing March 2025 | 1,000.0 |
| | 1,000.0 |
|
| 5.75% Senior Notes maturing March 2027 | 1,326.3 |
| | 1,500.0 |
|
| 5.00% Senior Notes maturing August 2026 | 1,710.3 |
| | 1,750.0 |
|
| 8.00% Senior Notes maturing July 2025 | 122.2 |
| | 137.5 |
|
| 6.00% Senior Notes maturing December 2022 | — |
| | 630.0 |
|
| Term Loan | 2,172.5 |
| | 2,194.5 |
|
| Bridge Loan (a) | — |
| | — |
|
| Capital leases | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| | 7,292.4 |
| | 7,212.2 |
|
| Less: Current Portion | (22.1 | ) | | (22.1 | ) |
| Debt issuance costs, net (a) | (71.2 | ) | | (81.8 | ) |
| Plus: Unamortized premium | 33.0 |
| | 40.8 |
|
| Total long-term debt | $ | 7,232.1 |
| | $ | 7,149.1 |
|
(a) In connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions, the Company classified its Bridge Loan and associated debt issuance costs as held for sale at September 30, 2018. See below for more information about the Bridge Loan. See Note 6 for information about assets and liabilities held for sale. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| 4.625% Senior Notes maturing April 2030 | $ | 1,650.0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| 5.50% Senior Notes maturing December 2029 | 750.0 | | | 750.0 | |
| 5.625% Senior Notes maturing January 2028 | 940.9 | | | 940.9 | |
| 5.50% Senior Notes maturing March 2025 | 0 | | | 1,000.0 | |
| 5.75% Senior Notes maturing March 2027 | 1,299.3 | | | 1,299.3 | |
| 5.00% Senior Notes maturing August 2026 | 1,697.3 | | | 1,697.3 | |
| | | |
| 8.00% Senior Notes maturing July 2025 | 0 | | | 122.2 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Term Loan | 0 | | | 1,309.5 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| BellRing Term B Facility | 673.7 | | | 0 | |
| BellRing Revolving Credit Facility | 30.0 | | | 0 | |
| Municipal bond | 8.5 | | | 0 | |
| Capital lease | 0 | | | 0.1 | |
| 7,049.7 | | | 7,119.3 | |
| Less: Current Portion | 64.9 | | | 13.5 | |
| Debt issuance costs, net | 62.6 | | | 69.0 | |
| Plus: Unamortized premium | 36.8 | | | 29.2 | |
| Total long-term debt | $ | 6,959.0 | | | $ | 7,066.0 | |
Senior Notes
On June 2, 2014, the Company issued $630.0 principal value of 6.00% senior notes due in December 2022. The 6.00% senior notes were issued at par, and the Company received $619.0 after paying related fees of $11.0, which were deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. The principal balance of these notes was repaid during the year ended September 30, 2018. Interest payments on the 6.00% senior notes were due semi-annually each June 15 and December 15.
On August 18, 2015, the Company issued $400.0 principal value of 8.00% senior notes duematuring in July 2025. The 8.00% senior notes were issued at par, and the Company received $396.0 after paying related fees of $4.0, which were deferred and were being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest payments on the 8.00% senior notes are due semi-annually each January 15 and July 15.
On August 3, 2016, the Company issued $1,750.0 principal value of 5.00% senior notes duematuring in August 2026. The 5.00% senior notes were issued at par, and the Company received $1,725.7 after paying related fees of $24.3, which were deferred and will be
are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest payments on the 5.00% senior notes are due semi-annually each February 15 and August 15. On February 8, 2019, the Company received consents (the “Requisite Consents”) from holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 5.00% senior notes to approve amendments to the indenture relating to the 5.00% senior notes (the “Indenture”). Following receipt of the Requisite Consents, the Company, its subsidiary guarantors and the trustee for the Indenture executed a supplemental indenture to give effect to the amendments. The supplemental indenture more closely aligned certain provisions of the Indenture with the comparable provisions included in the indentures for the Company’s other senior notes, specifically to (i) add an exception to the restricted payments covenant in the Indenture and (ii) revise the “Permitted Investments” definition in the Indenture to add an additional category of Permitted Investments under the Indenture. In connection with the required consents, the Company incurred $8.4 of debt modification costs during the year ended September 30, 2019, which were deferred and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the 5.00% senior notes, and recorded expense of $1.3 in the year ended September 30, 2019, which was included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
On February 14, 2017, the Company issued $1,000.0 principal value of 5.50% senior notes duematuring in March 2025 and $750.0 principal value of 5.75% senior notes duematuring in March 2027. The 5.50% senior notes maturing in March 2025 and the 5.75% senior notes were each issued at par, and the Company received $1,725.4 after paying related fees of $24.6, which were deferred and will beare being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. On August 10, 2017, the Company issued an additional $750.0 principal value of 5.75% senior notes duematuring in March 2027. The additional 5.75% senior notes were issued at 105.5% of par value, and the Company received $784.0 after paying investment banking and otherrelated fees of $7.2.$7.2, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the 5.75% senior notes. The premium related to the 5.75% senior notes was recorded as an unamortized premium, whichand is included in “Long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2018 and 2017 and will bebeing amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest payments on the 5.50% and 5.75% senior notes are due semi-annually each March 1 and September 1.
On December 1, 2017, the Company issued $1,000.0 principal value of 5.625% senior notes duematuring in January 2028. The 5.625% senior notes were issued at par, and the Company received $990.6 after paying investment banking and otherrelated fees of $9.4, which were
deferred and are being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest payments on the 5.625% senior notes are due semi-annually each January 15 and July 15.
On July 3, 2019, the Company issued $750.0 principal value of 5.50% senior notes maturing in December 2029. The 5.50% senior notes maturing in December 2029 were issued at par, and the Company received $743.0 after incurring investment banking and other fees and expenses of $7.0, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest payments on the 5.50% senior notes maturing in December 2029 are due semi-annually each June 15 and December 15.
On February 26, 2020, the Company issued $1,250.0 principal value of 4.625% senior notes maturing in April 2030. The 4.625% senior notes were issued at par, and the Company received $1,241.0 after incurring investment banking and other fees and expenses of $9.0, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest payments on the 4.625% senior notes are due semi-annually each April 15 and October 15, beginning on October 15, 2020. On August 14, 2020, the Company issued an additional $400.0 principal value of 4.625% senior notes maturing in April 2030. The additional 4.625% senior notes were issued at a price of 105.5% of the par value and the Company received $417.5 after incurring investment banking and other fees and expenses of $4.5 which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. The premium related to the 4.625% senior notes was recorded as an unamortized premium, and is being amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the term of the notes.
All of the Company’s senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries, other than immaterial subsidiaries, receivables finance subsidiaries and subsidiaries the Company designated as unrestricted subsidiaries, (the “Guarantors”). The Company’s foreignwhich such unrestricted subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior notes.includes 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries and BellRing Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries. These guarantees are subject to release in limited circumstances (only upon the occurrence of certain customary conditions).circumstances.
Credit Agreement
On March 28, 2017, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement and further amended(the “First AR Credit Agreement”). On March 18, 2020, the credit agreement on April 28, 2017, March 8, 2018 and August 17, 2018 (as furtherCompany entered into a second amended and restated the “Creditcredit agreement (the “Second AR Credit Agreement”). The Second AR Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $800.0$750.0 (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), with the commitments thereunder to be made available to the Company in U.S. Dollars, Canadian Dollars, Euros and Pounds Sterling. The issuance of lettersLetters of credit isare available under the Second AR Credit Agreement in an aggregate amount of up to $50.0.$75.0. The Company incurred $3.6 of issuance costs in connection with entering into the Second AR Credit Agreement, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Second AR Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Company recorded write-offs of debt issuance costs of $0.8 in the year ended September 30, 2020, which were included in “Loss on extinguishment of debt, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
During the year ended September 30, 2020, the Company borrowed $500.0 under the Revolving Credit Facility and repaid $500.0 on the Revolving Credit Facility. The proceeds under the Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital, general corporate or other purposes as permitted by the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility has outstanding letters of credit of $18.5,$18.8, which reduced the available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility to $781.5$731.2 atSeptember 30, 2018. The2020. Any outstanding amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility must be repaid on or before March 28, 2022. 18, 2025.
The Company incurred $4.2 and $4.6 of issuance costs in connection with theSecond AR Credit Agreement in the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which are included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Credit Agreement also provides for potential incremental revolving and term facilities at the request of the Company and at the discretion of the lenders or other persons providing such incremental facilities, in each case on terms to be determined, and also permits the Company to incur other secured or unsecured debt, in all cases subject to certain conditions to incur incremental equivalent debt, in an aggregate maximumand limitations on the amount not to exceed the greater of (1) $700.0 and (2) the maximum amount at which (A) the Company’s pro forma consolidated leverage ratio (as definedas specified in the Second AR Credit Agreement) would not exceed 6.50 to 1.00 and (B) the Company’s pro forma senior secured leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) would not exceed 3.00 to 1.00 as of the date such indebtedness is incurred. Additionally, the Agreement.
The Second AR Credit Agreement permits the Company to incur additional unsecured debt if, among other conditions, its consolidated interest coverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) would be greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 after giving effect to such new debt.
The Company entered into a third amendment to the Credit Agreement on August 17, 2018, which permits the Company, among other things, to designate certain of its subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries and once so designated, permits the disposition of (and authorizes the release of liens on) the assets of, and the equity interests in, the Company’ssuch unrestricted subsidiaries and permits the release of such unrestricted subsidiaries as guarantors.guarantors under the Second AR Credit Agreement. The Company’s obligations under the Second AR Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by its existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (other than immaterial domestic subsidiaries, certain excluded subsidiaries and subsidiaries the Company designates as unrestricted subsidiaries, which include 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries and BellRing Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries) and are secured by security interests in substantially all of the Company’s assets and the assets of its subsidiary guarantors, but excluding, in each case, real property.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest, at the option of the Company, at an annual rate equal to either (a) the Base Rate, Eurodollar Raterate or CDOR Rate (as such terms are defined(b) the base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum and (iii) the one-month Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% per annum, in the Credit Agreement)each case plus an applicable margin, ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%which initially were 1.50% for Eurodollar Rate-basedrate-based loans and CDOR Rate-based0.50% for base rate-based loans, and fromthereafter, will be determined by reference to the secured net leverage ratio (as defined in the Second AR Credit Agreement), with the applicable
margin for Eurodollar rate loans and base rate loans being (i) 2.00% and 1.00%, respectively, if the secured net leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 3.00:1.00, (ii) 1.75% and 0.75%, respectively, if the secured net leverage ratio is less than 3.00:1.00 and greater than or equal to 1.25% for Base Rate-based loans, depending in each case on1.50:1.00 or (iii) 1.50% and 0.50%, respectively, if the Company’s senior secured net leverage ratio.ratio is less than 1.50:1.00. Commitment fees on the daily unused amount of commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility initially accrued at the rate of 0.25%, and thereafter, will accrue at rates ranging from 0.250% toa rate of 0.375%, also depending on if the Company’s senior secured net leverage ratio.ratio is greater than 3.00:1.00, and will accrue at a rate of 0.25% if the Company’s secured net leverage ratio is less than or equal to 3.00:1.00.
The Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants customary for agreements of this type, including delivery of financial and other information, compliance with laws, maintenance of property, existence, insurance and books and records, inspection rights, obligation to provide collateral and guarantees by certain new subsidiaries, preparation of environmental reports, participation in an annual meeting with the agent and the lenders under the Credit Agreement, further assurances, limitations with respect to indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, restrictive agreements, use of proceeds, amendments of organization
documents, accounting changes, prepayments and amendments of certain indebtedness, dispositions of assets, acquisitions and other investments, sale leaseback transactions, conduct of business, transactions with affiliates, dividends and redemptions or repurchases of stock, and granting liens.
The Second AR Credit Agreement provides for customary events of default, including material breach of representations and warranties, failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to pay or default under certain other indebtedness in excess of $75.0,$100.0, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, inability to pay debts, the occurrence of one or more unstayed or undischarged judgments in excess of $75.0,$100.0, attachments issued against aall or any material part of the Company’s property, certain events under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), a change of control (as defined in control,the Second AR Credit Agreement), the invalidity of any loan document and the failure of the collateral documents to create a valid and perfected first priority lien and(subject to certain ERISA events.permitted liens). Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the maturity of the loans under the Second AR Credit Agreement may be acceleratedaccelerate and the agent and lenders under the Second AR Credit Agreement may exercise other rights and remedies available at law or under the loan documents, including with respect to the collateral and guarantees forof the Company’s obligations under the Second AR Credit Agreement.
2020 Bridge Loan
On October 11, 2019, in connection with the IPO and the formation transactions, the Company entered into a $1,225.0 bridge facility agreement (the “2020 Bridge Loan Facility”) and borrowed $1,225.0 under the 2020 Bridge Loan Facility (the “2020 Bridge Loan”). On October 21, 2019, BellRing entered into a borrower assignment and assumption agreement with the Company and the administrative agent under the 2020 Bridge Loan Facility, under which BellRing became the borrower under the 2020 Bridge Loan and assumed all interest of $2.2 thereunder, and the Company and its subsidiary guarantors (other than BellRing and its domestic subsidiaries) were released from all material obligations thereunder. The Company’sCompany retained the net cash proceeds of the 2020 Bridge Loan, and following the assumption by BellRing of the 2020 Bridge Loan Facility, used the cash proceeds of the 2020 Bridge Loan to repay a portion of the $1,309.5 outstanding principal balance of its Term Loan (as defined below). The domestic subsidiaries of BellRing continued to guarantee the 2020 Bridge Loan, and BellRing’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by each of the Guarantors. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are2020 Bridge Loan became secured by a first priority security interests oninterest in substantially all of the personal propertyassets (other than real property) of BellRing and in substantially all of the assets of its subsidiary guarantors. On October 21, 2019, the 2020 Bridge Loan was repaid in full by BellRing. In connection with the 2020 Bridge Loan Facility, the Company incurred issuance costs of $19.1, of which $15.3 were refunded to the Company at the closing of the IPO on October 21, 2019, and the Guarantorsremaining $3.8 of issuance costs were written off and are secured byincluded in “Loss on extinguishment of debt, net” in the material domestic real property assetsConsolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2020.
2018 Bridge Loan
On September 24, 2018, in connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions (see Note 6), the Company entered into a $625.0 bridge facility agreement (the “2018 Bridge Loan Facility”) and borrowed $625.0 under the Bridge Loan Facility (the 2018 Bridge Loan, as defined in Note 6). The 2018 Bridge Loan bore interest at a rate per annum equal to the Eurodollar Rate (as such term is defined in the 2018 Bridge Loan Facility) plus 450 basis points. In connection with the 2018 Bridge Loan Facility, the Company incurred issuance costs of $10.4, of which $7.8 were refunded to the Company at the closing of the Company8th Avenue Transactions on October 1, 2018, and the Guarantors.remaining $2.6 of issuance costs were written off and included in “Loss on extinguishment of debt, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2019 (see Note 6). Upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions on October 1, 2018, the 2018 Bridge Loan was assumed by 8th Avenue and the Company (other than 8th Avenue and its subsidiaries) was released from its repayment obligations thereunder while retaining the proceeds from the 2018 Bridge Loan.
Term Loans
On May 24, 2017, the Company entered into a Joinder Agreement No. 1 (“Joinder No. 1”). Joinder No.1 provided for an incremental term loan of $1,200.0 (the “ Joinder“Joinder No. 1 Term Loan”) under the First AR Credit Agreement. Pursuant to Joinder No. 1, the Company borrowed $1,200.0.$1,200.0 and used a portion of the proceeds to fund payments to holders of the Company’s then outstanding 8.00% senior notes and then outstanding 7.75% senior notes who tendered their notes in connection with the Company’s tender offer and whose notes were accepted for purchase and to pay related fees and expenses. On June 29, 2017, the Company entered into a Joinder Agreement No. 2 (“Joinder No. 2”). Joinder No. 2 provided for an incremental term loan of $1,000.0 (the “ Joinder No. 2 Term Loan”) under the First AR Credit Agreement. Pursuant to Joinder No. 2, the Company borrowed $1,000.0 and used the proceeds, together with cash on hand, to finance its fiscal 2017 acquisition of theLatimer Newco 2 Limited (“Latimer”), and all of Latimer’s direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Weetabix Group (see Note 4).Limited. The Joinder No. 2 Term Loan was combined with the outstanding amounts under the Joinder No.1 Term Loan (collectively the “Term Loan”). On
March 8, 2018, the Company entered into a second amendment to the First AR Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). Under the Second Amendment, the interest rate margin for the Term Loan was reduced by 25 basis points such that a Term Loan that is a Eurodollar Rate Loan accrues interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.00% per annum, and a Term Loan that is a Base Rate Loan accrues interest at the Base Rate plus 1.00% per annum (as such terms arewere defined in the First AR Credit Agreement). The maturity date for the Term Loan remains May 24, 2024, and allAll other material provisions of the Credit Agreement remainremained unchanged.
The Term Loan requires quarterly principal installments of $5.5, which began on September 30, 2017. The interest rate on the Term Loan was 4.22% and 3.49%4.04% at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company incurred $23.7 of issuance costs in2019.
Municipal Bond
In connection with the Term Loanongoing construction of a filtration system at the Company’s potato plant in Chaska, Minnesota, the Company continues to incur debt that guarantees the repayment of certain industrial revenue bonds used to finance the construction of the project. During the year ended September 30, 2017.
Bridge Loan
On September 24, 2018, in connection with the 8th Avenue Transactions (see Note 4),2020, the Company received $2.2 in proceeds related to the municipal bond and repaid $1.1 related to the municipal bond. Principal payments are due annually on March 1, and interest payments are due semi-annually each March 1 and September 1. The debt matures on March 1, 2028.
BellRing’s Credit Agreement and Senior Debt Facilities
On October 21, 2019, BellRing entered into a $625.0 bridge facilitycredit agreement (“Bridge Loan Facility”) and borrowed $625.0 under the Bridge Loan Facility (the Bridge Loan, as defined in Note 4). The Bridge Loan bore interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) with respect to the period commencing on September 24, 2018, and ending on October 1, 2018, the Eurodollar Rate (as such term is defined in the Bridge Loan Facility) plus 450 basis points “BellRing Credit Agreement”), (ii) with respect to the period commencing on October 1, 2018 and ending on October 8, 2018, the Eurodollar Rate plus 500 basis points, (iii) with respect to the period between October 8, 2018 and November 30, 2018, 12.00% and (iv) with respect to the period on or after November 30, 2018 through the maturity date, 12.25%. Payments of interest on the Bridge Loan were due on October 1, 2018, October 8, 2018, December 31, 2018 and the last day of each quarter thereafter. The Bridge Loan Facility would mature on August 23, 2024. In connection with the Bridge Loan Facility, the Company incurred issuance costs of $10.4, which are being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan. Of the total amount of debt issuance costs incurred, $7.8 were reimbursed to the Company at the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions on October 1, 2018.
Upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions on October 1, 2018, the Bridge Loan was assumed by 8th Avenue and the Company was released from its repayment obligations thereunder while retaining the proceeds from the Bridge Loan. Upon the assumption of the Bridge Loan by 8th Avenue, the Company was required under the Credit Agreement to use the net cash proceeds from the Bridge Loan and the cash proceeds received from THL under the Transaction Agreement to repay a portion of the Term Loan. Additionally, on October 1, 2018, 8th Avenue and its domestic subsidiaries (other than immaterial subsidiaries and other excluded subsidiaries) entered into (i) a First Lien Credit Agreement and (ii) a Second Lien Credit Agreement .The First Lien Credit Agreement provides for (i) a term B loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $525.0$700.0 (the “First Lien“BellRing Term LoanB Facility”) and (ii) a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $200.0 (the “BellRing Revolving Credit Facility”), with the commitments under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility to be made available to BellRing in U.S. Dollars, Euros and Pounds Sterling. Letters of credit are available under the BellRing Credit Agreement in an aggregate amount of up to $150.0 (the “First Lien$20.0.The outstanding amounts under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility”)Facility and BellRing Term B Facility must be repaid on or before October 21, 2024.
On October 21, 2019, BellRing borrowed the full amount under the BellRing Term B Facility and $100.0 under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility. The BellRing Term B Facility was issued at 98.0% of par and BellRing received $776.4 from the BellRing Term B Facility and BellRing Revolving Credit Facility after accounting for the original issue discount of $14.0 and paying investment banking and other fees of $9.6, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the terms of the loans. BellRing used the proceeds, together with the net proceeds of the IPO that were contributed to it by BellRing Brands, Inc., (i) to repay in full the $1,225.0 of borrowings under the 2020 Bridge Loan and all interest thereunder and related costs and expenses, (ii) to pay directly, or reimburse the Company for, as applicable, all fees and expenses incurred by BellRing Brands, Inc., BellRing or the Company in connection with the IPO and the formation transactions, (iii) to reimburse the Company for the amount of cash on BellRing’s balance sheet immediately prior to the completion of the IPO and (iv) for general corporate and working capital purposes, as well as to repay $20.0 of outstanding borrowings under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility.
During the year ended September 30, 2020, BellRing borrowed $195.0 under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility and repaid $165.0 on the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2020, the available borrowing capacity under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility was $170.0 and there were no outstanding letters of credit.
Borrowings under the BellRing Term B Facility bear interest, at the option of BellRing, at an annual rate equal to either (a) the Eurodollar rate or (b) the base rate determined by reference to the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% per annum and (iii) the one-month Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% per annum, in each case plus an applicable margin of 5.00% for Eurodollar rate-based loans and 4.00% for base rate-based loans. The BellRing Term B Facility requires quarterly scheduled amortization payments of $8.75, which began on March 31, 2020, with the balance to be paid at maturity on October 21, 2024. Interest was paid on each Interest Payment Date (as defined in the BellRing Credit Agreement) during the year ended September 30, 2020. The BellRing Term B Facility contains customary mandatory prepayment provisions, including provisions for mandatory prepayment (a) from the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales and (b) beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, of 75% of consolidated excess cash flow (as defined in the BellRing Credit Agreement) (which percentage will be reduced to 50% if the secured net leverage ratio (as defined in the BellRing Credit Agreement) is less than or equal to 3.35:1.00 as of a fiscal year end). The Second LienCompany classified $28.8 related to this mandatory prepayment of excess cash flow in “Current portion of long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2020. BellRing may prepay the BellRing Term B Facility at its option without penalty or premium. The interest rate on the BellRing Term B Facility was 6.00% at September 30, 2020.
Borrowings under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the option of BellRing, at an annual rate equal to either the Eurodollar rate or the base rate (determined as described above) plus a margin, which initially were 4.25% for Eurodollar rate-based loans and 3.25% for base rate-based loans, and thereafter, will be determined by reference to the secured net leverage ratio, with the applicable margin for Eurodollar rate-based loans and base rate-based loans being (i) 4.25% and 3.25%, respectively, if the secured net leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 3.50:1.00, (ii) 4.00% and 3.00%, respectively, if the secured net leverage ratio is less than 3.50:1.00 and greater than or equal to 2.50:1.00 or (iii) 3.75% and 2.75%, respectively, if the secured net leverage ratio is less than 2.50:1.00. Facility fees on the daily unused amount of commitments under the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility initially accrued at the rate of 0.50% per annum and thereafter, depending on
BellRing’s secured net leverage ratio, will accrue at rates ranging from 0.25% to 0.50% per annum. The interest rate on the drawn portion of the BellRing Revolving Credit Facility was 5.25% at September 30, 2020.
The BellRing Credit Agreement provides for incremental revolving and term facilities, and also permits other secured or unsecured debt, if, among other conditions, certain financial ratios are met, as defined and specified in the BellRing Credit Agreement.
The BellRing Credit Agreement provides for customary events of default, including material breach of representations and warranties, failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to pay or default under certain other material indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, inability to pay debts, the occurrence of one or more unstayed or undischarged judgments in excess of$65.0, certain events under ERISA, the invalidity of any loan document, a term loanchange in an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 (the “Second Lien Term Loan Facility”). 8th Avenue usedcontrol and the proceedsfailure of the First Lien Term Loan Facility,collateral documents to create a valid and perfected first priority lien. Upon the Second Lien Term Loan Facilityoccurrence and a portionduring the continuance of an event of default, the maturity of the First
Lien Revolving Credit Facility to repay the Bridge Loanloans under the Bridge FacilityBellRing Credit Agreement to pay certain feesmay accelerate and expenses relatedthe agent and lenders under the BellRing Credit Agreement may exercise other rights and remedies available at law or under the loan documents, including with respect to the 8th Avenue Transactionscollateral and for general corporate purposes.guarantees of BellRing’s obligations under the BellRing Credit Agreement.
Obligations under the BellRing Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries of BellRing (other than immaterial subsidiaries, certain excluded subsidiaries and subsidiaries of BellRing it designates as unrestricted subsidiaries) and are secured by security interests in substantially all of the assets of BellRing and the assets of its subsidiary guarantors (other than real estate), subject to limited exceptions. The Company and its subsidiaries (other than BellRing and certain of its subsidiaries) are not obligors or guarantors under the BellRing debt facilities.
Repayments of Long-Term Debt
The following table shows the Company’s repayments of long-term debt and associated gain or loss included in “Loss on extinguishment of debt” ondebt, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations forOperations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Repayments of Long-Term Debt | | Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, net |
Year Ended
September 30, | | Issuance | | Principal Amount Repaid | | Debt Repurchased at a Discount | | Premium and Debt Extinguishment Costs Paid | | Write-off of Debt Issuance Costs | | Write-off of Unamortized Premium |
| | Term Loan | | $ | 1,309.5 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 9.1 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | 2020 Bridge Loan | | 1,225.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 3.8 | | | 0 | |
| | 5.50% Senior Notes maturing in March 2025 | | 1,000.0 | | | 0 | | | 41.3 | | | 8.7 | | | 0 | |
| | Revolving Credit Facility | | 500.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | BellRing Revolving Credit Facility | | 165.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | 8.00% Senior Notes | | 122.2 | | | 0 | | | 8.5 | | | 0.7 | | | 0 | |
| | BellRing Term B Facility | | 26.3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | Municipal bond | | 1.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | Second AR Credit Agreement | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.8 | | | 0 | |
| 2020 | | Total | | $ | 4,349.1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 49.8 | | | $ | 23.1 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Term Loan | | $ | 863.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 7.6 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | 5.75% Senior Notes | | 27.0 | | | (1.5) | | | 0 | | | 0.3 | | | (0.7) | |
| | 5.625% Senior Notes | | 20.0 | | | (1.3) | | | 0 | | | 0.2 | | | 0 | |
| | 5.00% Senior Notes | | 13.0 | | | (1.2) | | | 0 | | | 0.1 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Capital lease | | 0.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | 2018 Bridge Loan (a) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 2.6 | | | 0 | |
| 2019 | | Total | | $ | 923.1 | | | $ | (4.0) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 10.8 | | | $ | (0.7) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 6.00% Senior Notes | | $ | 630.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 30.8 | | | $ | 6.5 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | 5.625% Senior Notes | | 39.1 | | | (2.1) | | | 0 | | | 0.4 | | | 0 | |
| | 5.75% Senior Notes | | 173.7 | | | (3.1) | | | 0 | | | 1.9 | | | (4.6) | |
| | 5.00% Senior Notes | | 39.7 | | | (2.5) | | | 0 | | | 0.4 | | | 0 | |
| | 8.00% Senior Notes | | 15.3 | | | 0 | | | 2.0 | | | 0.1 | | | 0 | |
| | Term Loan (b) | | 22.0 | | | 0 | | | 0.9 | | | 0.4 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | | Total | | $ | 919.8 | | | $ | (7.7) | | | $ | 33.7 | | | $ | 9.7 | | | $ | (4.6) | |
(a)In connection with the yearsassumption of the 2018 Bridge Loan by 8th Avenue discussed above, the Company recorded a write-off of debt issuance costs during the year ended September 30, 2019 for costs that were not refunded upon the closing of the 8th Avenue Transactions.
(b)In connection with the Second Amendment entered into on March 8, 2018, 2017the Company paid debt extinguishment costs and 2016.recorded a write-off of debt issuance costs.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Repayments of Long-Term Debt | | Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, net |
Year Ended
September 30, | | Issuance | | Principal Amount Repaid | | Debt Repurchased at a Discount | | Premium and Debt Extinguishment Costs Paid | | Write-offs of Debt Issuance Costs | | Write-off of Unamortized (Premium)/Discount |
| | | 6.00% Senior Notes | | $ | 630.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 30.8 |
| | $ | 6.5 |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | 5.625% Senior Notes | | 39.1 |
| | (2.1 | ) | | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
|
| | | 5.75% Senior Notes | | 173.7 |
| | (3.1 | ) | | — |
| | 1.9 |
| | (4.6 | ) |
| | | 5.00% Senior Notes | | 39.7 |
| | (2.5 | ) | | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
|
| | | 8.00% Senior Notes | | 15.3 |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
| | | Term Loan (a) | | 22.0 |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
|
| 2018 | | Total | | $ | 919.8 |
| | $ | (7.7 | ) | | $ | 33.7 |
| | $ | 9.7 |
| | $ | (4.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 6.75% Senior Notes | | $ | 875.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 63.0 |
| | $ | 8.9 |
| | $ | (13.4 | ) |
| | | 7.375% Senior Notes | | 133.0 |
| | — |
| | 4.9 |
| | 1.2 |
| | (2.1 | ) |
| | | 7.75% Senior Notes | | 800.0 |
| | — |
| | 108.6 |
| | 6.3 |
| | — |
|
| | | 8.00% Senior Notes | | 262.5 |
| | — |
| | 43.3 |
| | 2.2 |
| | — |
|
| | | Term Loan | | 5.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | TEUs | | 11.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | 4.57% 2012 Series Bond | | 1.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Capital lease | | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 2017 | | Total | | $ | 2,088.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 219.8 |
| | $ | 18.6 |
| | $ | (15.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 7.375% Senior Notes | | $ | 1,242.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 88.0 |
| | $ | 12.4 |
| | $ | (21.8 | ) |
| | | Term Loan | | 374.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.4 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| | | TEUs | | 14.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | 4.57% 2012 Series Bond | | 1.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | | Capital lease | | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 2016 | | Total | | $ | 1,632.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 88.0 |
| | $ | 18.8 |
| | $ | (20.4 | ) |
| |
(a) | In connection with the Second Amendment discussed above, the Company recorded a write-off of debt issuance costs and other expenses during the year ended September 30, 2018.
|
Debt Covenants
Second AR Credit Agreement
Under the terms of the Second AR Credit Agreement, the Company is required to comply with a financial covenant consisting of a ratio for quarterly maximum senior secured net leverage ratio (as defined in the Second AR Credit Agreement) not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00, measured as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, if, as of the last day of such fiscal quarter, the aggregate outstanding amount of all revolving credit loans, swing line loans and letter of credit obligations (subject to certain exceptions specified in the Second AR Credit Agreement) exceeds 30% of the Company’s revolving credit commitments. As of September 30, 2018,2020, the Company was not required to comply with such financial covenant as the aggregate amount of the aforementioned obligations did not exceed 30%. of the Company’s revolving credit commitments.
The Second AR Credit Agreement provides for incremental revolving and term loan facilities, and also permits the Company to incur additionalother secured or unsecured debt, if, among other conditions, the pro forma consolidated interest coverage ratio, calculatedcertain financial ratios are met, as provideddefined and specified in the Second AR Credit Agreement.
BellRing Credit Agreement
Under the terms of the BellRing Credit Agreement, would be greater than or equalBellRing is required to 2.00comply with a financial covenant requiring BellRing to maintain a total net leverage ratio (as defined in the BellRing Credit Agreement) not to exceed 6.00 to 1.00, after giving effect to such new debt. Asmeasured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The total net leverage ratio of BellRing did not exceed this threshold as of September 30, 2018,2020.
The BellRing Credit Agreement provides for incremental revolving and term facilities, and also permits other secured or unsecured debt, if, among other conditions, certain financial ratios are met, as defined and specified in the pro forma consolidated interest coverage ratio exceeded this threshold.BellRing Credit Agreement.
NOTE 1718 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
Antitrust claimsClaims
In late 2008 and early 2009, someapproximately 22 class action lawsuits were filed in various federal courts against Michael Foods, Inc. (“MFI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and someapproximately 20 other defendants (producers of shell eggs and egg products and egg industry organizations), alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws in connection with the production and sale of shell eggs and egg products, and seeking unspecified damages. All cases were transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated and/or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
The casecases involved three3 plaintiff groups: (1)(i) a nationwide class of direct purchasers of shell eggs (“direct(the “direct purchaser class”); (2)(ii) individual companies (primarily large grocery chains and food companies that purchase considerable quantities of eggs) that opted out of various settlements and filed their own complaints related to their purchases of shell eggs and egg products (“opt-out plaintiffs”); and (3)(iii) indirect purchasers of shell eggs (“indirect purchaser plaintiffs”).
Resolution of claims: (1) In To date, MFI has resolved the following claims, including all class claims: (i) in December 2016, MFI settled all claims asserted against it by the direct purchaser class for a payment of $75.0, which was approved by the district court in December 2017; (2)(ii) in January 2017, MFI settled all claims asserted against it by opt-out plaintiffs related to shell egg purchases on confidential terms in January 2017; and (3)terms; (iii) in June 2018, MFI settled all claims asserted against it by indirect purchaser plaintiffs on confidential terms.terms; and (iv) between June 2019 and September 2019, MFI individually settled on confidential terms egg product opt-out claims asserted against it by four separate opt-out plaintiffs. MFI has at all times denied liability in this matter, and no settlement contains any admission of liability by MFI.
Remaining portion of the case:cases: MFI remains a defendant only with respect to claims that seek damages based on purchases of egg products by three opt-out plaintiffs. The district court had granted summary judgment precluding any claims for egg products purchases by such opt-out plaintiffs, but the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded these claims for further pre-trial proceedings. Defendants have filed a second motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the claims, and that motion is currently pending.which was denied in June 2019. The remaining opt-out plaintiffs have not yet been assigned trial dates.
Although the likelihood of a material adverse outcome in the egg antitrust litigation has been significantly reduced as a result of the MFI settlements described above, the remaining portion of the casecases could still result in a material adverse outcome. At September 30, 2018,2020 and 2019, the Company had accrued $6.0$3.5 and $6.2, respectively, for this matter that was included in “Other current liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. There was no accrual for these matters at September 30, 2017.Sheets. The Company records reserves for litigation losses in accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.” Under ASC Topic 450, a loss contingency is recorded if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company records probable loss contingencies based on the best estimate of the loss. If a range of loss can be reasonably estimated, but no single amount within the range appears to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. These estimates are often initially developed earlier than when the ultimate loss is known, and the estimates are adjusted if additional information becomes known. Although the Company believes its accruals for this matter are appropriate, the final amounts required to resolve such matter could differ materially from recorded estimates and the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected.
During the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company expensed $8.3, $74.5$5.0 and $28.5$8.3 related to these settlements, respectively, which was included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No expense was recorded in the year ended September 30, 2020 related to these matters. Under current law, any
settlement paid, including the settlements with the direct purchaser plaintiffs, the opt-out plaintiffs and the indirect purchaser plaintiffs, is deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Bob Evans Appraisal Proceedings
Prior to completion of the Company’s acquisition of Bob Evans on January 12, 2018, Bob Evans received demands from certain stockholders demanding appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock. After the completion of the acquisition, several such former stockholders filed petitions in the Delaware Court of Chancery (Arbitrage Fund v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. filed on January 23, 2018; Blue Mountain Credit Alternatives Master Fund L.P., et al. v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. filed on April 30, 2018; and 2017 Clarendon LLC, et al. v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. filed on April 30, 2018) seeking appraisal of their shares of Bob Evans common stock pursuant to Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“Section 262”). The lawsuits seeksought appraisal for such shares, plus statutory interest, as well as the costs of the proceedings and such other relief as appropriate. Under Section 262, persons who were stockholders at the time of the closing arewere entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and receive payment of the “fair value” of such shares (plus statutory interest) as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery so long as such persons comply with applicable procedural requirements. By virtue of these lawsuits, approximately 3.3 shares of Bob Evans common stock (which were held by such former stockholders) are beforeChancery. In May 2018, the court for appraisal. As of completion ofconsolidated the acquisition, former Bob Evans stockholders can no longer submit new demands for appraisal. All other former stockholders have been paid for their shares atlawsuits into one action.
In December 2018, the Company settled with one petitioner, Arbitrage Fund, and Arbitrage Fund was dismissed with prejudice from the consolidated action. In addition, in December 2018, the Company pre-paid the $77.00 per share merger consideration to the Blue Mountain and 2017 Clarendon petitioners, effectively stopping the continued accrual of statutory interest on that amount. The Company intendsmade total payments of $257.6, inclusive of the aforementioned prepayment of $77.00 per share merger consideration, related to vigorously defendthese matters in fiscal 2019. In September 2019, the cases.Company reached settlement terms on a confidential basis with the remaining petitioners regarding their outstanding appraisal claims. The settlement was finalized and the remaining portion of the case was dismissed in October 2019. All former Bob Evans stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares were paid for their shares of Bob Evans common stock.
At September 30, 2018,2019, the Company had an accrual of $267.0 included$19.1, which was reported in “Other“Other current liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet forSheet. All remaining cash payments related to these matters which iswere made in October 2019 and there was no accrual reported on the number of shares of Bob Evans common stock for which former Bob Evans stockholders have demanded appraisal and have not withdrawn their demands multiplied by the $77.00 per share merger consideration, plus statutory interest (see Note 4). There were no accruals for these mattersConsolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017. While2020. During the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company believes its accrualexpensed $9.7 and $13.4, respectively, related to these matters. The expense was included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2019 and in “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2018. No expense was recorded in the year ended September 30, 2020 related to these matters is appropriate, the final amounts required to resolve such matters could differ materially and the Company’s results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected. Accordingly, the Company cannot predict what impact, if any, these matters and any results from such matters could have on the Company’s future results of operations or cash flows.matters.
Other
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon the information presently known, the ultimate liability, if any, arising from such pending legal proceedings, as well as from asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims which are likely to be asserted, taking into account established accruals for estimated liabilities (if any), are not expected to be material individually or in the aggregate to the consolidated financial position,condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. In addition, although it is difficult to estimate the potential financial impact of actions regarding expenditures for compliance with regulatory matters, in the opinion of management, based upon the information currently available, the ultimate liability arising from such compliance matters is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial position,condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Leases
Lease Commitments
Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases in effect as of September 30, 2018 were $28.2, $26.4, $24.6, $23.9, $21.6 and $84.8 for fiscal 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and thereafter, respectively.
Bob Evans Lease GuaranteeGuarantees
Historically, Bob Evans guaranteed certain payment and performance obligations associated with the leases for 143 properties (the "Guarantee"“Guarantees”) leased by the restaurant business formerly owned by Bob Evans (the “Bob Evans Restaurant Business”). The GuaranteeGuarantees remained in effect following the Company’s acquisition of Bob Evans. In the event the Bob Evans Restaurant Business fails to meet its payment and performance obligations under these leases, subject in certain cases to certain early termination allowances, the Company may be required to make rent and other payments to the landlord under the requirements of the Guarantee.Guarantees. Should the Company, as guarantor of the lease obligations, be required to make all lease payments due for the remaining term of the leases subsequent to September 30, 2018,2020, the maximum amount the Company may be required to pay is equal to the annual rent amount for the remainder of the lease terms. The current annual rent on these leases is $13.5$13.9 and will increase up to 1.5% annually based on indexed inflation. The lease terms for the majority of the leases extend for approximately 17 years from September 30, 2018,2020, and the GuaranteeGuarantees would remain in effect in the event the leases are extended for a renewal period. In the event the Company is obligated to make payments under any of the Guarantee,Guarantees, the Company believes its exposure is limited due to protections and recourse available in the leases associated with the leased properties, including a requirement of the landlord to mitigate damages by re-letting the properties in default. TheWhile the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the restaurants industry generally, including the Bob Evans Restaurant Business, the Bob Evans Restaurant Business was able to amend certain of its leases during fiscal 2020 in order to ensure that it continues to meet
its obligations under these leases, and there have beenis no eventsindication that would indicate the obligations will not continue to be met. As such, the Company believes the fair value of the GuaranteeGuarantees is immaterial as of September 30, 2018.2020.
NOTE 1819 — PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company maintains qualified defined benefit plans in the U.S., the United KingdomU.K. and Canada for certain employees primarily within its Post Consumer Brands and Weetabix segments. Certain of the Company’s employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s postretirement benefit plans (partially subsidized retiree health and life insurance). The following disclosures reflect amounts related to the Company’s employees based on separate actuarial valuations, projections and certain allocations. Amounts for the Canadian plans are included in the North America disclosures and are not disclosed separately because they do not constitute a significant portion of the combined amounts. With respect to defined benefits for Canadian Post Consumer Brands employees, eligibility is frozen to new entrants and benefit accrual is frozen for salaried employees. During the year ended September 30, 2018, certain U.S. defined benefit plans for Weetabix NA employees were merged into the Company defined benefit plan for U.S. employees. With respect to defined benefits for U.S. Post Consumer Brands employees, eligibility is frozen to new employees and the benefit accruals are frozen for all administrative employees and certain production employees. BenefitThe benefit accrual is frozen for salaried Weetabix NANorth America employees in the U.S. With respect to defined benefit plans for Weetabix employees in the United Kingdom,U.K participating in the executive and group schemes of the defined benefit pension plans, eligibility is frozen to new entrants and the benefit accrual is frozen with respect to participants in the executive scheme.participants.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the pension plans’ benefit obligations and fair value of assets over the two year period ended September 30, 2018,2020 and a statement of the funded status and amounts recognized on the combined balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20182020 and 2017.2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | Other International |
| Year Ended
September 30, | | Year Ended
September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Change in benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 121.5 | | | $ | 100.9 | | | $ | 780.5 | | | $ | 691.2 | |
| Service cost | 4.3 | | | 3.7 | | | 0 | | | 5.6 | |
| Interest cost | 3.7 | | | 4.1 | | | 14.7 | | | 18.9 | |
| Plan participants’ contributions | 0.5 | | | 0.5 | | | 0 | | | 2.2 | |
| Prior service cost (a) | 0 | | | 0 | | | 11.4 | | | 1.5 | |
| Actuarial loss | 6.6 | | | 17.3 | | | 17.6 | | | 126.6 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Benefits paid | (5.4) | | | (4.6) | | | (25.9) | | | (26.2) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Currency translation | (0.1) | | | (0.4) | | | 36.1 | | | (39.3) | |
| Benefit obligation at end of period | $ | 131.1 | | | $ | 121.5 | | | $ | 834.4 | | | $ | 780.5 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value of plan assets | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | $ | 119.7 | | | $ | 114.1 | | | $ | 946.9 | | | $ | 844.5 | |
| Actual return on plan assets | 6.4 | | | 9.8 | | | 28.1 | | | 169.9 | |
| Employer contributions | 0.4 | | | 0.3 | | | 0 | | | 4.8 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Plan participants’ contributions | 0.5 | | | 0.5 | | | 0 | | | 2.2 | |
| Benefits paid | (5.4) | | | (4.6) | | | (25.9) | | | (26.2) | |
| Currency translation | (0.1) | | | (0.4) | | | 44.1 | | | (48.3) | |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of period | 121.5 | | | 119.7 | | | 993.2 | | | 946.9 | |
| Funded status | $ | (9.6) | | | $ | (1.8) | | | $ | 158.8 | | | $ | 166.4 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Amounts recognized in assets or liabilities | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 158.8 | | | $ | 166.4 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Other liabilities | (9.8) | | | (2.1) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Net amount recognized | $ | (9.6) | | | $ | (1.8) | | | $ | 158.8 | | | $ | 166.4 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 28.2 | | | $ | 23.4 | | | $ | (32.3) | | | $ | (46.5) | |
| Prior service cost | 0.3 | | | 0.4 | | | 11.5 | | | 0.1 | |
| Total | $ | 28.5 | | | $ | 23.8 | | | $ | (20.8) | | | $ | (46.4) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 3.01 | % | | 3.32 | % | | n/a | | n/a |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 2.71 | % | | 2.84 | % | | n/a | | n/a |
| Discount rate — Other international plans | n/a | | n/a | | 1.73 | % | | 1.84 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — U.S. plans | 3.00 | % | | 3.00 | % | | n/a | | n/a |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % | | n/a | | n/a |
| Rate of compensation increase — Other international plans | n/a | | n/a | | 2.65 | % | | 2.55 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North America | | Other International |
| | Year Ended
September 30, | | Year Ended
September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Change in benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 100.6 |
| | $ | 71.2 |
| | $ | 723.6 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Service cost | 4.2 |
| | 4.1 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 1.7 |
|
| Interest cost | 3.6 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 19.6 |
| | 4.9 |
|
| Plan participants’ contributions | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Actuarial gain | (4.3 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (14.0 | ) | | (46.4 | ) |
| Business combinations | — |
| | 25.5 |
| | — |
| | 746.0 |
|
| Benefits paid | (3.4 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | | (27.6 | ) | | (6.2 | ) |
| Currency translation | (0.4 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | (19.5 | ) | | 23.0 |
|
| Benefit obligation at end of period | $ | 100.9 |
| | $ | 100.6 |
| | $ | 691.2 |
| | $ | 723.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Change in fair value of plan assets | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | $ | 80.9 |
| | $ | 54.3 |
| | $ | 876.7 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Actual return on plan assets | 3.9 |
| | 5.4 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Employer contributions | 32.6 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Business combinations | — |
| | 15.2 |
| | — |
| | 852.2 |
|
| Plan participants’ contributions | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Benefits paid | (3.4 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | | (27.6 | ) | | (6.2 | ) |
| Currency translation | (0.5 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | (23.8 | ) | | 27.4 |
|
| Fair value of plan assets at end of period | 114.1 |
| | 80.9 |
| | 844.5 |
| | 876.7 |
|
| Funded status | $ | 13.2 |
| | $ | (19.7 | ) | | $ | 153.3 |
| | $ | 153.1 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Amounts recognized in assets or liabilities | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | $ | 13.7 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 153.3 |
| | $ | 153.1 |
|
| Other liabilities | (0.5 | ) | | (21.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net amount recognized | $ | 13.2 |
| | $ | (19.7 | ) | | $ | 153.3 |
| | $ | 153.1 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | 14.3 |
| | $ | (32.0 | ) | | $ | (40.2 | ) |
| Prior service cost | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | 14.9 |
| | $ | (32.0 | ) | | $ | (40.2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 4.30 | % | | 3.86 | % | | n/a |
| | n/a |
|
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 3.53 | % | | 3.63 | % | | n/a |
| | n/a |
|
| Discount rate — Other international plans | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | 2.81 | % | | 2.72 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — U.S. plans | 3.00 | % | | 3.00 | % | | n/a |
| | n/a |
|
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.69 | % | | n/a |
| | n/a |
|
| Rate of compensation increase — Other international plans | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | 2.75 | % | | 2.70 | % |
The fair value of plan assets for(a)During the North American pension plans exceeded the accumulated benefit obligation atyear ended September 30, 2018, whereas2020, the Company recognized prior service cost as a result of an amendment to the benefit plan for Weetabix employees in the U.K. participating in the group scheme. During the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company recognized prior service cost as a result of U.K. high court rulings made in connection with the Guaranteed Minimum Pension (the “GMP”).
The accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of plan assets for the North American pension plans at September 30, 2017.2020, whereas the fair value of plan assets for the North American pension plans equaled the accumulated benefit obligation at September 30, 2019. The fair value of plan assets for the other international pension plans exceeded the
accumulated benefit obligation at September 30, 20182020 and September 30, 2017.2019. The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation for the North
American pension plans was $98.9$129.3 and $98.3$119.7 at September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation for the other international pension plans was $677.6$831.1 and $690.4$776.4 at September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans including amounts recognized in OCI.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North America |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 4.2 |
| | $ | 4.1 |
| | $ | 4.0 |
|
| Interest cost | 3.6 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | (4.4 | ) | | (3.2 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
| Recognized net actuarial loss | 1.1 |
| | 1.6 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Recognized prior service cost | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | 5.3 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost | | | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 3.86 | % | | 3.66 | % | | 4.55 | % |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 3.63 | % | | 3.18 | % | | 3.82 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — U.S. plans | 3.00 | % | | 2.99 | % | | 3.00 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.69 | % | | 2.50 | % | | 2.75 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets — U.S. plans | 5.46 | % | | 5.33 | % | | 5.20 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets — Canadian plans | 6.00 | % | | 6.00 | % | | 6.00 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Changes in benefit obligation recognized in Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| Net (gain) loss | $ | (3.7 | ) | | $ | (3.1 | ) | | $ | 5.1 |
|
| Recognized loss | (1.1 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | (1.1 | ) |
| Plan amendment (a) | — |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Recognized prior service cost | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
| Currency translation | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (before tax effects) | $ | (4.9 | ) | | $ | (5.0 | ) | | $ | 4.2 |
|
| |
(a) | In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company finalized a new collective bargaining agreement that resulted in an amendment to its North American pension plans. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Other International |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 6.7 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest cost | 19.6 |
| | 4.9 |
| | — |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | (31.7 | ) | | (7.5 | ) | | — |
|
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | (5.4 | ) | | $ | (0.9 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 2.72 | % | | 2.61 | % | | — | % |
| Rate of compensation increase | 2.70 | % | | 2.75 | % | | — | % |
| Expected return on plan assets | 3.56 | % | | 3.52 | % | | — | % |
| | | | | | |
| Changes in plan assets and benefit obligation recognized in Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| Net loss (gain) | $ | 8.2 |
| | $ | (39.3 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Currency translation | — |
| | (0.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (before tax effects) | $ | 8.2 |
| | $ | (40.2 | ) | | $ | — |
|
The estimated net actuarial loss For the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and prior2018, service cost expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI intowas reported in “Cost of goods sold” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and all other components of net periodic benefit cost duringwere reported in “Other income, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 4.3 | | | $ | 3.7 | | | $ | 4.2 | |
| Interest cost | 3.7 | | | 4.1 | | | 3.6 | |
| Expected return on plan assets | (6.4) | | | (6.4) | | | (4.4) | |
| Recognized net actuarial loss | 1.8 | | | 0 | | | 1.1 | |
| Recognized prior service cost | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |
| | | | | |
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 3.5 | | | $ | 1.5 | | | $ | 4.6 | |
| | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost | | | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 3.32 | % | | 4.30 | % | | 3.86 | % |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 2.84 | % | | 3.53 | % | | 3.63 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — U.S. plans | 3.00 | % | | 3.00 | % | | 3.00 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % | | 2.69 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets — U.S. plans | 5.53 | % | | 5.74 | % | | 5.46 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets — Canadian plans | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | 6.00 | % |
| | | | | |
| Changes in plan assets and benefit obligation recognized in Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| Net loss (gain) | $ | 6.6 | | | $ | 13.9 | | | $ | (3.7) | |
| Recognized loss | (1.8) | | | 0 | | | (1.1) | |
| | | | | |
| Recognized prior service cost | (0.1) | | | (0.1) | | | (0.1) | |
| | | | | |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (before tax effects) | $ | 4.7 | | | $ | 13.8 | | | $ | (4.9) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other International |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 0 | | | $ | 5.6 | | | $ | 6.7 | |
| Interest cost | 14.7 | | | 18.9 | | | 19.6 | |
| Expected return on plan assets | (24.6) | | | (28.8) | | | (31.7) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Recognized curtailment (a) | 0 | | | 1.5 | | | 0 | |
| Net periodic benefit income | $ | (9.9) | | | $ | (2.8) | | | $ | (5.4) | |
| | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 1.84 | % | | 2.81 | % | | 2.72 | % |
| | | | | |
| Rate of compensation increase | 2.55 | % | | 2.75 | % | | 2.70 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets | 2.53 | % | | 3.51 | % | | 3.56 | % |
| | | | | |
| Changes in plan assets and benefit obligation recognized in Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| Net loss (gain) | $ | 14.2 | | | $ | (14.4) | | | $ | 8.2 | |
| | | | | |
| Prior service cost (b) | 11.4 | | | 1.5 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
| Recognized curtailment (a) | 0 | | | (1.5) | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (before tax effects) | $ | 25.6 | | | $ | (14.4) | | | $ | 8.2 | |
(a)In September 2019, relatedthe Company signed an amendment to North Americanthe pension benefits are zerodeed to close the defined benefit plan for Weetabix employees in the U.K. participating in the group scheme. Eligibility is frozen to new entrants, and $0.1, respectively. There are no estimated net actuarial gain andthe benefit accrual is frozen with respect to current participants. Due to the closure of the group scheme plan, the prior service cost (credit) expected to be reclassified fromrecognized in accumulated OCI into net periodicin connection with the GMP high court rulings was reclassified to earnings during the year ended September 30, 2019.
(b)During the year ended September 30, 2020, the Company recognized prior service cost as a result of an amendment to the benefit plan for Weetabix employees in the U.K. participating in the group scheme. During the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company recognized prior service cost during 2019 related to other international pension benefits. as a result of U.K. high court rulings made in connection with the GMP.
The Company expects to make contributions of $0.5$0.2 and $5.00 to its defined benefit North American and other international pension plans, respectively, during fiscal 2019.2021.
The expected return on North American pension plan assets was determined based on historical and expected future returns of the various asset classes, using the target allocation. The broad target allocations are 51.0%55.6% equity securities, 34.5%40.8% fixed income 10.0% debt securities, 4.0%and bonds, 2.6% real assets and 0.5% cash.1.0% cash and cash equivalents. At September 30, 2018,2020, equity securities were 53.6%58.3%, fixed income was 33.2%, debt securitiesand bonds were 8.9%40.6%, real assets were 3.4%0.1% and cash was 0.9%and cash equivalents were 1.0% of the fair value of total plan assets, 99.6%99.5% of which was invested in passive index funds. At September 30, 2017,2019, equity securities were 58.3%46.4%, fixed income was 17.6%, debt securitiesand bonds were 19.4%47.3%, real assets were 3.7%5.3% and cash wasand cash equivalents were 1.0% of the fair value of total plan assets, 69.6%99.6% of which was invested in passive index funds. The allocation guidelines were established based on management’s determination of the appropriate risk posture and long-term objectives.
The expected return on other international pension plan assets was determined based on historical and expected future returns of the various asset classes, using the target allocation. The broad target allocations are 52.6% debt securities, 20.8%67.1% fixed income and bonds, 30.2% liability driven instruments, 20.8% fixed income, 3.6%investments, 2.5% real assets and 0.2% othercash and 2.0% cash.cash equivalents. At September 30, 2018, debt securities2020, fixed income and bonds were 57.3%69.6%, liability hedging instrumentsdriven investments were 23.8%27.2%, fixed income was 18.5%, other was 0.2%real assets were 1.3% and cash was 0.2%and cash equivalents were 1.9% of the fair value of total plan assets, 31.8%34.4% of which was invested in passive index funds. At September 30, 2017, debt securities2019, fixed income and bonds were 52.7%62.5%, liability hedging instrumentsdriven investments were 23.3%, fixed income was 23.2%30.1%, real assets were 0.4%, other was 0.1%1.7% and cash was 0.3%and cash equivalents were 5.7% of the fair value of total plan assets, 25.6%33.7% of which was invested in passive index funds. The allocation guidelines were established by the trustees of the plan based on management’stheir determination of the appropriate risk posture and long-term objectives.objectives after consulting with management.
The following tables present the North American and other international pension plans’ assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the basis for that measurement. The fair value of mutual funds is based on quoted net asset values of the shares held by the planplans at year end. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with fiscal 2020 presentation.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America |
| September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 |
| Equities | $ | 10.5 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 10.5 | | | $ | 9.9 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 9.9 | |
| Fixed income and bonds | 5.5 | | | 0 | | | 5.5 | | | 5.3 | | | 0 | | | 5.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1.3 | | | 1.3 | | | 0 | | | 1.2 | | | 1.2 | | | 0 | |
| Fair value of plan assets in the fair value hierarchy | 17.3 | | | 1.3 | | | 16.0 | | | 16.4 | | | 1.2 | | | 15.2 | |
| Equities | 60.3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 45.6 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed income and bonds | 43.8 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 51.3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Real assets | 0.1 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6.4 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Investments measured at net asset value (a) | 104.2 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 103.3 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total plan assets | $ | 121.5 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 16.0 | | | $ | 119.7 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | $ | 15.2 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North America |
| | September 30, 2018 | | September 30, 2017 |
| | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 |
| Equities | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | 16.4 |
| | $ | 7.8 |
| | $ | 8.6 |
|
| Bonds | 10.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 10.0 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 11.3 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 14.7 |
| | — |
| | 14.7 |
| | 4.6 |
| | — |
| | 4.6 |
|
| Real assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
|
| Cash | 1.1 |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
|
| Fair value of plan assets in the fair value hierarchy | 35.4 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 34.2 |
| | 34.0 |
| | 20.8 |
| | 13.2 |
|
| Equities | 51.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Pooled assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 23.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Real assets | 3.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Investments measured at net asset value (a) | 78.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total plan assets | $ | 114.1 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 34.2 |
| | $ | 80.9 |
| | $ | 20.8 |
| | $ | 13.2 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other International |
| September 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2019 |
| Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 |
| Fixed income and bonds | $ | 642.1 | | | $ | 642.1 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 554.8 | | | $ | 554.8 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Liability driven instruments | 241.6 | | | 241.6 | | | 0 | | | 258.6 | | | 258.6 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 16.1 | | | 16.1 | | | 0 | | | 51.3 | | | 51.3 | | | 0 | |
| Fair value of plan assets in the fair value hierarchy | 899.8 | | | 899.8 | | | 0 | | | 864.7 | | | 864.7 | | | 0 | |
| Fixed income and bonds | 49.2 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 37.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Liability driven instruments | 28.6 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 26.0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real assets | 12.8 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 16.5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2.8 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 2.7 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Investments measured at net asset value (a) | 93.4 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 82.2 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total plan assets | $ | 993.2 | | | $ | 899.8 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 946.9 | | | $ | 864.7 | | | $ | 0 | |
(a)In accordance with ASC Topic 820-10, certain investments were measured at net asset value per share (“NAV”). In cases where the fair value was measured at NAV using the practical expedient provided for in ASC Topic 820-10, the investments have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in these tables are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the tables above.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Other International |
| | September 30, 2018 | | September 30, 2017 |
| | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 |
| Bonds | $ | 439.5 |
| | $ | 416.6 |
| | $ | 22.9 |
| | $ | 461.7 |
| | $ | 441.1 |
| | $ | 20.6 |
|
| Liability driven instruments | 201.4 |
| | 201.4 |
| | — |
| | 204.2 |
| | 204.2 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 61.5 |
| | 61.5 |
| | — |
| | 108.3 |
| | 108.3 |
| | — |
|
| Cash | 1.6 |
| | 1.6 |
| | — |
| | 2.7 |
| | 2.7 |
| | — |
|
| Fair value of plan assets in the fair value hierarchy | 704.0 |
| | 681.1 |
| | 22.9 |
| | 776.9 |
| | 756.3 |
| | 20.6 |
|
| Bonds | 44.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 94.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 95.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Real assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | 1.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Investments measured at net asset value (a) | 140.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 99.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total plan assets | $ | 844.5 |
| | $ | 681.1 |
| | $ | 22.9 |
| | $ | 876.7 |
| | $ | 756.3 |
| | $ | 20.6 |
|
| |
(a) | In accordance with ASC Topic 820-10, certain investments were measured at net asset value per share (“NAV”). In cases where the fair value was measured at NAV using the practical expedient provided for in ASC Topic 820-10, the investments have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in these tables are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the tables above. |
Other Postretirement Benefits
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the North American other postretirement benefit obligations over the two year period ended September 30, 2018.2020. Besides the North American plans, the Company does not maintain any other postretirement benefit plans.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended
September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Change in benefit obligation | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 66.4 | | | $ | 55.2 | |
| Service cost | 0.6 | | | 0.4 | |
| Interest cost | 1.9 | | | 2.1 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Actuarial loss | 4.6 | | | 11.5 | |
| | | |
| Benefits paid | (2.7) | | | (2.6) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Currency translation | (0.1) | | | (0.2) | |
| Benefit obligation at end of period | $ | 70.7 | | | $ | 66.4 | |
| | | |
| Change in fair value of plan assets | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Employer contributions | 2.7 | | | 2.6 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Benefits paid | (2.7) | | | (2.6) | |
| | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of period | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Funded status | $ | (70.7) | | | $ | (66.4) | |
| | | |
| Amounts recognized in assets or liabilities | | | |
| | | |
| Other current liabilities | (2.8) | | | (2.5) | |
| Other liabilities | (67.9) | | | (63.9) | |
| Net amount recognized | $ | (70.7) | | | $ | (66.4) | |
| | | |
| Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | |
| Net actuarial loss | $ | 14.3 | | | $ | 10.3 | |
| Prior service credit | (14.7) | | | (19.4) | |
| Total | $ | (0.4) | | | $ | (9.1) | |
| | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 2.79 | % | | 3.20 | % |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 2.78 | % | | 2.86 | % |
| | | |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Change in benefit obligation | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 65.0 |
| | $ | 68.6 |
|
| Service cost | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Interest cost | 2.1 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Plan amendment | — |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Actuarial gain | (9.9 | ) | | (4.4 | ) |
| Benefits paid | (2.3 | ) | | (2.1 | ) |
| Currency translation | (0.2 | ) | | 0.4 |
|
| Benefit obligation at end of period | $ | 55.2 |
| | $ | 65.0 |
|
| | | | |
| Change in fair value of plan assets | | | |
| Employer contributions | 2.3 |
| | 2.1 |
|
| Benefits paid | (2.3 | ) | | (2.1 | ) |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of period | — |
| | — |
|
| Funded status | $ | (55.2 | ) | | $ | (65.0 | ) |
| | | | |
| Amounts recognized in assets or liabilities | | | |
| Other current liabilities | (2.4 | ) | | (2.7 | ) |
| Other liabilities | (52.8 | ) | | (62.3 | ) |
| Net amount recognized | $ | (55.2 | ) | | $ | (65.0 | ) |
| | | | |
| Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | |
| Net actuarial (gain) loss | $ | (1.2 | ) | | $ | 8.6 |
|
| Prior service credit | (24.1 | ) | | (28.8 | ) |
| Total | $ | (25.3 | ) | | $ | (20.2 | ) |
| | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 4.27 | % | | 3.77 | % |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 3.54 | % | | 3.69 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % |
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the other postretirement benefit plans including amounts recognized in OCI. For the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, service cost was reported in “Cost of goods sold” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and all other components of net periodic benefit cost were reported in “Other income, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 0.6 | | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.5 | |
| Interest cost | 1.9 | | | 2.1 | | | 2.1 | |
| Recognized net actuarial loss | 0.6 | | | 0 | | | 0.3 | |
| Recognized prior service credit | (4.7) | | | (4.7) | | | (4.7) | |
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | (1.6) | | | $ | (2.2) | | | $ | (1.8) | |
| | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans | 3.20 | % | | 4.27 | % | | 3.77 | % |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 2.86 | % | | 3.54 | % | | 3.69 | % |
| | | | | |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % |
| | | | | |
| Changes in benefit obligation recognized in Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| Net loss (gain) | $ | 4.6 | | | $ | 11.5 | | | $ | (9.9) | |
| Recognized net actuarial loss | (0.6) | | | 0 | | | (0.3) | |
| | | | | |
| Recognized prior service credit | 4.7 | | | 4.7 | | | 4.7 | |
| Currency translation | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.4 | |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (before tax effects) | $ | 8.7 | | | $ | 16.2 | | | $ | (5.1) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
| Interest cost | 2.1 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 4.0 |
|
| Recognized net actuarial loss | 0.3 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Recognized prior service credit | (4.7 | ) | | (4.8 | ) | | (3.8 | ) |
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | (1.8 | ) | | $ | (1.5 | ) | | $ | 2.8 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost | | | | | |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans (Prior to plan amendment) (a) | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | 4.60 | % |
| Discount rate — U.S. plans (Subsequent to plan amendment) (a) | 3.77 | % | | 3.54 | % | | 4.22 | % |
| Discount rate — Canadian plans | 3.69 | % | | 3.23 | % | | 3.91 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase — Canadian plans | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % | | 2.75 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Changes in plan assets and benefit obligation recognized in Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | |
| Net gain | $ | (9.9 | ) | | $ | (4.4 | ) | | $ | (11.3 | ) |
| Recognized loss | (0.3 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | (1.6 | ) |
| Plan amendment (a) | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (36.1 | ) |
| Recognized prior service credit | 4.7 |
| | 4.8 |
| | 3.8 |
|
| Currency translation | 0.4 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (before tax effects) | $ | (5.1 | ) | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | (45.3 | ) |
| |
(a) | In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company finalized a new collective bargaining agreement that resulted in an amendment to its other postretirement benefit plans. The plan was re-measured as of February 29, 2016. For fiscal 2016, the discount rate was 4.6% for the first five months of benefit cost and 4.22% for the last seven months of benefit cost. |
For September 30, 20182020 measurement purposes, the assumed annual rate of increase in the future per capita cost of covered health care benefits related to domestic plans for 20192021 was 6.5%6.1% for participants both under the age of 65 and over the age of 65, declining gradually to an ultimate rate of 5.0% for 2025 and beyond. For September 30, 20172019 measurement purposes, the assumed annual rate of increase in the future per capita cost of covered health care benefits related to domestic plans for 20182020 was 7.0% and 5.8%6.3% for participants both under the age of 65 and over the age of 65, respectively, declining gradually to an ultimate rate of 5.0% for 20222025 and beyond. For September 30, 20182020 and 20172019 measurement purposes, the assumed annual rate of increase in the future per capita cost of covered health care benefits related to Canadian plans for the following fiscal year was 6.0%5.0% and 6.5%5.5%, respectively, declining gradually to an ultimate rate of 4.5% for 2021 and beyond for the years ended September 30, 20182020 and 2017. A 1% change in assumed health care cost trend rates would result in the following changes in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and in the total service and interest cost components for fiscal 2018:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Increase | | Decrease |
| Effect on postretirement benefit obligation | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | (4.3 | ) |
| Effect on total service and interest cost | 0.3 |
| | (0.2 | ) |
The estimated net actuarial gain and prior service credit expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI into net periodic benefit cost during 2019 related to other postretirement benefits are $0.1 and $4.7, respectively.2019.
Additional Information
As of September 30, 2018,2020, expected future benefit payments and related federal subsidy receipts (Medicare Part D) in the next ten fiscal years were as follows:
| | | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024- 2028 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2025- 2029 |
| Pension benefits | $ | 23.0 |
| | $ | 23.9 |
| | $ | 24.9 |
| | $ | 26.0 |
| | $ | 27.1 |
| | $ | 155.5 |
| Pension benefits | $ | 25.2 | | | $ | 26.3 | | | $ | 27.3 | | | $ | 28.5 | | | $ | 29.8 | | | $ | 168.9 | |
| Other benefits | 2.4 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| Other benefits | 2.9 | | | 3.2 | | | 3.5 | | | 3.6 | | | 3.6 | | | 18.3 | |
| Subsidy receipts | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 1.1 |
| Subsidy receipts | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.2 | | | 0.2 | | | 1.0 | |
In addition to the defined benefit plans described above, the Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan under which it makes matching contributions. The Company expensed $19.6, $18.2$18.4, $17.9 and $15.6$19.6 for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively.
NOTE 1920 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company’s employees, including BellRing employees, participate in Post’s 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Post 2012 Plan”), Post’s 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Post 2016 Plan”) and Post’s 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Post 2019 Plan”) (collectively, the “Post Long-Term Incentive Plans”). Subsequent to the IPO, BellRing’s employees also began participating in Belling’s 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “BellRing 2019 Plan”).
Post Long-Term Incentive Plans
On February 3, 2012, the Company established the Post 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (the “2012 Plan”) which permitted the issuance of various stock-based compensation awards of up to 6.5 shares. On January 28, 2016, the Company establishedCompany’s shareholders approved the Post 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (the “2016 Plan”) which permitspermitted the issuance of stock-based compensation awards of up to 2.4 shares. Upon establishmentthe effectiveness of the Post 2016 Plan, all remaining shares available to be issued under the Post 2012 Plan were transferred to the Post 2016 Plan. On January 24, 2019, the Company’s shareholders approved the Post 2019 Plan, which permits the issuance of stock-based compensation awards of up to 1.2 shares, plus shares remaining to be issued under the Post 2016 Plan (including any shares assumed thereunder from the Post 2012 Plan) which were transferred to the Post 2019 Plan upon its effectiveness. Awards issued under the 2012 Plan and 2016 PlanPost Long-Term Incentive Plans have a maximum term of 10 years, provided, however, that the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors may, in its discretion, grant awards with a longer term to participants who are located outside of the United States.U.S.
The following disclosures reflect the details of Post’s Long-Term Incentive Plans, which includes BellRing employees who participate in such plans.
Total compensation cost for Post’s cash and non-cash stock-based compensation awards recognized in the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 2017was $47.1, $39.7 and 2016 was $33.8, $30.7 and $25.6, respectively, and the related recognized deferred tax benefit for each of those periods was approximately $7.8, $9.7$7.0, $6.6 and $8.0,$7.8, respectively. As of September 30, 2018,2020, the total compensation cost related to Post’s non-vested awards not yet recognized was $55.5,$59.7, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.11.7 years.
In connection with employee retirement and reorganization initiatives during fiscal 2015, the Company accelerated the vesting of unvested equity awards for 25 employees in the year ended September 30, 2016. As a result of this acceleration, the Company recorded $2.2 of incremental cash and stock-based compensation expense in the year ended September 30, 2016. No such expense was recorded in the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Post Stock Appreciation Rights (“SSAR”Post SSARs”)
Information about Post SSARs is summarized in the following table. Upon exercise of each Post SSAR, the holder will receive the number of shares of Post common stock equal in value to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value at the date of exercise, less all applicable taxes. The total intrinsic value of Post SSARs exercised was $0.1 $0.6 and $5.1 in$0.1 during the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020 and 2016,2018, respectively. There were no Post SSARs exercised during the year ended September 30, 2019.There were no Post SSARs granted during the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.2020, 2019 or 2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| in millions, except Post SSARs or where otherwise indicated | Post SSARs | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term in Years | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 136,031 | | | $ | 41.94 | | | | | |
| Granted | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Exercised | (1,031) | | | 18.10 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Expired | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 135,000 | | | 42.12 | | | 2.75 | | $ | 5.9 | |
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2020 | 135,000 | | | 42.12 | | | 2.75 | | 5.9 | |
| Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | 135,000 | | | 42.12 | | | 2.75 | | 5.9 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 137,831 |
| | $ | 41.63 |
| | | | |
| Granted | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (1,800 | ) | | 18.10 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Expired | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2018 | 136,031 |
| | 41.94 |
| | 4.73 | | $ | 7.6 |
|
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2018 | 136,031 |
| | 41.94 |
| | 4.73 | | 7.6 |
|
| Exercisable at September 30, 2018 | 136,031 |
| | 41.94 |
| | 4.73 | | 7.6 |
|
Post Cash Settled Stock Appreciation Rights (“SAR”Post SARs”)
Information about Post SARs is summarized in the following table. There were no Post SARs granted during the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.2020, 2019 or 2018. Cash used by the Company to settle Post SARs was $0.2 and $5.0 and $0.7 forduring the years ended September 30, 20182020 and 2016,2018, respectively. There were no cash settlements of Post SARs forduring the year ended September 30, 2017.2019.
| | | | Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 104,500 |
| | $ | 46.43 |
| | | | | |
| in millions, except Post SARs or where otherwise indicated | | in millions, except Post SARs or where otherwise indicated | Post SARs | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term in Years | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | | Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 2,500 | | | $ | 18.10 | | | | | |
| Granted | — |
| | — |
| | | Granted | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Exercised | (102,000 | ) | | 47.12 |
| | | Exercised | (2,500) | | | 18.10 | | |
| Forfeited | — |
| | — |
| | | Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Expired | — |
| | — |
| | | Expired | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2018 | 2,500 |
| | 18.10 |
| | 1.98 | | $ | 0.2 |
| |
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2018 | 2,500 |
| | 18.10 |
| | 1.98 | | 0.2 |
| |
| Exercisable at September 30, 2018 | 2,500 |
| | 18.10 |
| | 1.98 | | 0.2 |
| |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | | Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 0 | | | n/a | | n/a | | n/a |
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2020 | | Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2020 | 0 | | | n/a | | n/a | | n/a |
| Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | | Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | 0 | | | n/a | | n/a | | n/a |
The fair value of each Post SAR was estimated for each reporting period using the Black-Scholes Model. The expected term is estimated based on the award’s vesting period and contractual term, along with historical exercise behavior on similar awards. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility trends and other factors. The risk-free rate is the interpolated U.S. Treasury rate for a term equal to the expected term. The following table presents the assumptions used to remeasure the fair value of outstanding SARs at September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.Post SARs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Expected term (in years) | | | 0 | | 0.0 |
| Expected stock price volatility | | | 24.8% | | 21.5% |
| Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.8% | | 2.6% |
| Expected dividends | | | 0% | | 0% |
| Fair value (per Post SAR) | | | $87.84 | | $79.94 |
|
| | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Expected term | 0 | | 2.9 | | 3.8 |
| Expected stock price volatility | 21.5% | | 31.7% | | 32.4% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.6% | | 1.6% | | 1.0% |
| Expected dividends | 0% | | 0% | | 0% |
| Fair value (per right) | $79.94 | | $54.18 | | $44.44 |
Post Stock Options
| | | | Stock Options | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2017 | 4,198,500 |
| | $ | 45.36 |
| | | | | |
| in millions, except Post stock options or where otherwise indicated | | in millions, except Post stock options or where otherwise indicated | Post Stock Options | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term in Years | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | | Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 1,758,026 | | | $ | 58.03 | | | | | |
| Granted | 248,206 |
| | 80.04 |
| | | Granted | 30,504 | | | 106.51 | | |
| Exercised | (128,999 | ) | | 45.12 |
| | | Exercised | (89,250) | | | 44.11 | | |
| Forfeited | (6,667 | ) | | 71.32 |
| | | Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Expired | — |
| | — |
| | | Expired | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2018 | 4,311,040 |
| | 47.32 |
| | 5.63 | | $ | 218.6 |
| |
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2018 | 4,311,040 |
| | 47.32 |
| | 5.63 | | 218.6 |
| |
| Exercisable at September 30, 2018 | 3,647,330 |
| | 43.67 |
| | 5.24 | | 198.3 |
| |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | | Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 1,699,280 | | | 59.63 | | | 5.21 | | $ | 46.1 | |
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2020 | | Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2020 | 1,699,280 | | | 59.63 | | | 5.21 | | 46.1 | |
| Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | | Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | 1,509,246 | | | 55.91 | | | 4.88 | | 45.6 | |
The fair value of each Post stock option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Model. The Company uses the simplified method for estimating a Post stock option term as it does not have sufficient historical sharestock options exercise experience upon which to estimate an expected term. The expected term is estimated based on the award’s vesting period and contractual term. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility trends and other factors. The risk-free rate is the interpolated U.S. Treasury rate for a term equal to the expected term. The weighted-average assumptions and fair values for Post stock options granted are summarized in the table below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Expected term (in years) | 6.5 | | 6.5 | | 6.5 |
| Expected stock price volatility | 29.2% | | 29.7% | | 30.7% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.8% | | 3.1% | | 2.2% |
| Expected dividends | 0% | | 0% | | 0% |
| Fair value (per Post stock option) | $35.32 | | $33.82 | | $28.52 |
The total intrinsic value of Post stock options exercised was $5.5, $148.2 and $4.7 in the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company received proceeds from the exercise of Post stock options of $3.9, $112.6 and $5.7 during the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016 are summarized in the table below.
|
| | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Expected term | 6.5 | | 6.5 | | 6.5 |
| Expected stock price volatility | 30.7% | | 30.6% | | 29.1% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.2% | | 1.9% | | 1.9% |
| Expected dividends | 0% | | 0% | | 0% |
| Fair value (per option) | $28.52 | | $24.80 | | $20.22 |
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $4.7, $17.6 and $5.1 in the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Post Restricted Stock Units (“Post RSUs”)
| | | | Restricted Stock Units | | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2017 | 730,040 |
| | $ | 63.55 |
| |
| in millions, except Post RSUs or where otherwise indicated | | in millions, except Post RSUs or where otherwise indicated | Post RSUs | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2019 | | Nonvested at September 30, 2019 | 1,013,939 | | | $ | 81.27 | |
| Granted | 478,325 |
| | 80.19 |
| Granted | 351,786 | | | 103.97 | |
| Vested | (213,824 | ) | | 60.99 |
| Vested | (413,820) | | | 82.16 | |
| Forfeited | (52,673 | ) | | 75.01 |
| Forfeited | (21,972) | | | 95.08 | |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2018 | 941,868 |
| | 71.94 |
| |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2020 | | Nonvested at September 30, 2020 | 929,933 | | | 89.14 | |
The grant date fair value of each restricted stockPost RSU award was determined based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The weighted-average grant date fair value of nonvested Post RSUs was $89.14, $81.27 and $71.94 at September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The total vest date fair value of restricted stock unitsPost RSUs that vested during fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018 2017was $42.1, $24.9 and 2016 was $17.4, $10.5 and $32.0, respectively.
In fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016,11,400 of the Company13,300 Post RSUs granted 13,300, 10,200 and 15,000 restricted stock unitsby the Company to its non-management members of the Board of Directors respectively. Due to vesting provisions of these awards, the Company determined that 11,400, 8,500 and 12,500 of these awards granted in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, had subjective acceleration rights such that the Company expensed the grant date fair value upon issuance and recognized related expense of $0.9 in the year ended September 30, 2018 and $0.7 in each2018. None of the years ended September 30, 2017Post RSUs granted in fiscal 2020 and 2016.2019 to non-management members of the Board of Directors had subjective acceleration rights and those awards are being amortized over the terms of the awards.
Post Cash Settled Restricted Stock Units (“Post Cash RSUs”)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| in millions, except Post Cash RSUs or where otherwise indicated | Post Cash RSUs | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2019 | 49,000 | | | $ | 51.43 | |
| Granted | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Vested | (9,800) | | | 51.43 | |
| Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2020 | 39,200 | | | 51.43 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units | | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2017 | 100,119 |
| | $ | 49.47 |
|
| Granted | — |
| | — |
|
| Vested | (38,537 | ) | | 43.28 |
|
| Forfeited | (1,330 | ) | | 62.90 |
|
| Nonvested at September 30, 2018 | 60,252 |
| | 53.13 |
|
At September 30, 2020, the 39,200 nonvested Post Cash settled restricted stock awards are liability awards and as such, their fair value is based upon the closing price of the Company’s stock for each reporting period, with the exception of 49,000 cash settled restricted stock units that areRSUs were valued at the greater of the closing stock price or the grant price of $51.43.$51.43. Cash used by the Company to settle restricted stock unitsPost Cash RSUs was $3.2, $4.1$0.9, $1.1 and $5.9$3.2 for the years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Post Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (“PRSU”Post PRSUs”)
| | in millions, except Post PRSUs or where otherwise indicated | | in millions, except Post PRSUs or where otherwise indicated | Post PRSUs | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2019 | | Nonvested at September 30, 2019 | 82,871 | | | $ | 112.75 | |
| Granted | | Granted | 90,836 | | | 138.10 | |
| | | Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units | | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2017 | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Granted | 32,307 |
| | 97.74 |
| |
| Vested | — |
| | — |
| Vested | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Forfeited | — |
| | — |
| Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2018 | 32,307 |
| | 97.74 |
| |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2020 | | Nonvested at September 30, 2020 | 173,707 | | | 126.00 | |
During the yearyears ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company granted Post PRSUs to certain employees. These awards will be earned by comparing the Company’sPost’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) during a three year period to the respective TSRs of companies in a performance peer group. Based upon the Company’sPost’s ranking in its performance peer group when comparing TSRs, a recipient of the Post PRSU grant may earn a total award ranging from 0% to 200% of the target award. The fair value of each Post PRSU was estimated on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation. There were noThe assumptions for Post PRSUs granted during the years ended September 30, 20172020, 2019 and 2016. 2018 are summarized in the table below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Expected term (in years) | 3.0 | | 3.0 | | 3.0 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Expected stock price volatility | 22.2% | | 24.2% | | 31.8% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.6% | | 2.9% | | 1.8% |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Fair value (per Post PRSU) | $138.10 | | $122.34 | | $97.74 |
BellRing Long-Term Incentive Plan
On October 22, 2019, BellRing registered shares of its Class A Common Stock on a Form S-8 filed with the SEC, for issuance under the BellRing 2019 Plan, which permits the issuance of various stock-based compensation awards of up to 2.0 shares of BellRing’s Class A Common Stock. Awards issued under the BellRing 2019 Plan have a maximum term of 10 years, provided, however, that the corporate governance and compensation committee of BellRing’s board of directors may, in its discretion, grant awards with a longer term to participants who are located outside of the U.S.
Total compensation cost for BellRing’s non-cash stock-based compensation awards recognized in the year ended September 30, 2020 was $2.5, and the related recognized deferred tax benefit was $0.6. As of September 30, 2020, the total compensation cost related to BellRing’s non-vested awards not yet recognized was $5.7, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
BellRing Stock Options
Information about BellRing’s stock options is summarized in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| in millions, except BellRing stock options or where otherwise indicated | BellRing Stock Options | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per Share | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term in Years | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2019 | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | | | |
| Granted | 96,000 | | | 19.31 | | | | | |
| Exercised | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Expired | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Outstanding at September 30, 2020 | 96,000 | | | 19.31 | | | 9.15 | | $ | 0.1 | |
| Vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2020 | 96,000 | | | 19.31 | | | 9.15 | | 0.1 | |
| Exercisable at September 30, 2020 | 0 | | | n/a | | n/a | | n/a |
The fair value of each BellRing stock option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Model. BellRing uses the simplified method for estimating a BellRing stock option term as it does not have sufficient historical stock options exercise experience upon which to estimate an expected term. The expected term is estimated based on the award’s vesting period and contractual term. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility trends and other factors. The risk-free rate is
the interpolated U.S. Treasury rate for a term equal to the expected term. The weighted-average assumptions and fair values for PRSUsBellRing stock options granted during the year ended September 30, 20182020 are summarized in the table below.
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 | | | | |
| Expected term (in years) | 20186.5 | | | | |
Expected term | 3.0 |
| Expected stock price volatility | 31.8%38.5% | | | | |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.8%1.6% | | | | |
Expected dividend yielddividends | 0% | | | | |
| Fair value (per BellRing option) | $7.92 | | | | |
BellRing Restricted Stock Units (“BellRing RSUs”)
Information about BellRing’s RSUs is summarized in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| in millions, except BellRing RSUs or where otherwise indicated | BellRing RSUs | | Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2019 | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Granted | 395,232 | | | 19.39 | |
| Vested | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Forfeited | (10,000) | | | 19.31 | |
| Nonvested at September 30, 2020 | 385,232 | | | 19.39 | |
The grant date fair value of each BellRing RSU was determined based upon the closing price of BellRing’s Class A Common Stock on the date of grant.
Deferred Compensation
Post provides deferred compensation plans for directors and key employees through which eligible participants may elect to defer payment of all or a portion of their compensation, or with respect to key employee participants, all or a portion of their eligible annual bonus, until a later date based on the participant’s elections. Participant deferrals for employee participants may be notionally invested in Post common stock equivalents (Equity Option)(the “Equity Option”) or into a number of funds operated by The Vanguard Group Inc. with a variety of investment strategies and objectives (Vanguard Funds)(the “Vanguard Funds”). In order to receive a 33.3% matching contribution, deferrals for director participants must be made into Post common stock equivalents. Deferrals into the Equity Option are generally distributed in Post stock for employees and cash for directors, while deferrals into the Vanguard Funds are distributed in cash. There are no significant costs related to the administration of the deferred compensation plans. Post funds its deferred compensation liability (potential cash distributions) by investing in the Vanguard Funds in substantially the same amounts as selected by the participating employees. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on these investments are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset the related change in the deferred compensation liability. For additional information, refer to Note 15.
NOTE 20 — TANGIBLE EQUITY UNITS
In May 2014, the Company completed a public offering of 2.875 TEUs, each with a stated value of $100.00. Each TEU was comprised of a prepaid stock purchase contract and a senior amortizing note due June 1, 2017. The prepaid common stock purchase contracts were recorded as additional paid-in capital, net of issuance costs, and the senior notes were recorded as long-term debt. Issuance costs associated with the debt component were recorded as deferred financing costs within “Long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and were amortized using the effective interest rate method over the term of the instrument to June 1, 2017. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, there was no long-term debt related to TEUs recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Post allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the TEUs to equity and debt based on the relative fair values of the respective components of each TEU. The proceeds received in the offering were $278.6, which were net of financing fees of $8.9. The aggregate values assigned upon issuance of each component of the TEUs were as follows (amounts in millions except price per TEU):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Equity Component | | Debt Component | | TEUs Total |
| Price per TEU | $ | 85.48 |
| | $ | 14.52 |
| | $ | 100.00 |
|
| Gross proceeds | $ | 245.7 |
| | $ | 41.8 |
| | $ | 287.5 |
|
| Issuance costs | (7.6 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | | (8.9 | ) |
| Net proceeds | $ | 238.1 |
| | $ | 40.5 |
| | $ | 278.6 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Balance sheet impact (at issuance) | | | | | |
| Long-term debt (deferred financing fees) | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
|
| Current portion of long-term debt | — |
| | 13.3 |
| | 13.3 |
|
| Long-term debt | — |
| | 28.5 |
| | 28.5 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 238.1 |
| | — |
| | 238.1 |
|
The senior amortizing note componentHolders of TEUs, or their separated purchase contract components, settled 2.8 and 0.1 purchase contracts during the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for which the Company issued 4.7 and 0.2 shares of common stock during the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. All outstanding purchase contracts were settled as of September 30, 2017.
NOTE 21 — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had two classes of preferred stock, the 2.5% Series C Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred”) and the 3.75% Series B Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred”). There are 50.0 preferred shares authorized.
Series C Preferred
The Series C Preferred has a $0.01 par value per share and a $100.00 liquidation value per share. There were 3.2 shares outstanding at both September 30, 2018 and 2017. The Series C Preferred earns cumulative dividends at a rate of 2.5% per annum payable quarterly on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15. The Series C Preferred is non-voting and ranks senior tofollowing table summarizes the Company’s outstandingrepurchases of its common stock uponstock.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Shares repurchased | 6.1 | | | 3.3 | | | 2.8 | |
| Average share price | $ | 97.67 | | | $ | 98.78 | | | $ | 76.21 | |
| Total cost including broker’s commissions (a) | $ | 587.8 | | | $ | 330.8 | | | $ | 218.7 | |
(a)Of the Company’s dissolution or liquidation. The Series C Preferred has no maturity date; however, holders of the Series C Preferred may convert their stock at an initial conversion rate of 1.8477 shares of the Company’s common stock per share of convertible preferred stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $54.12 per share of common stock.
On or after February 15, 2019, the Company may redeem all or some of the Series C Preferred at a redemption price equal to 100% of the liquidation preference per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date if the closing sale price of our common stock has been at least 150% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days$587.8 total cost recorded during any 30 day trading day period ending on, and including, the trading day immediately preceding the date of the redemption notice.
Series B Preferred
The Series B Preferred had a $0.01 par value per share and a $100.00 liquidation value per share. There were zero and 1.5 shares outstanding at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Series B Preferred earned cumulative dividends at a rate of 3.75% per annum payable quarterly on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15. The Series B Preferred was non-voting and ranked senior to the Company’s outstanding common stock upon the Company’s dissolution or liquidation.
In December 2015, the Company and a holder of the Company’s Series B Preferred entered into an exchange agreement pursuant to which the shareholder agreed to deliver 0.9 shares of the Series B Preferred to the Company in exchange for 2.0 shares of common stock and $10.9 of cash. The number of shares of common stock exchanged in the transaction was based upon the current conversion rate, under the Certificate of Designation, Rights and Preferences for the Series B Preferred, of 2.1192 shares of common stock per share of Series B Preferred. For the year ended September 30, 2016, the cash paid increased “Preferred stock dividends”2020, $7.4 was not settled until October 2020 and was included in “Other current liabilities” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.Balance Sheet at September 30, 2020. Of the $330.8 total cost recorded during the year ended September 30, 2019, $8.7 was not settled until October 2019 and was included in “Other current liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2019.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2018,The Company may, from time to time, enter into common stock structured repurchase arrangements with financial institutions using general corporate funds. Under such arrangements, the Company completedpays a fixed sum of cash upon execution of each agreement in exchange for the redemptionright to receive either a predetermined amount of its Series B Preferred. Substantially all of the 1.5 shares of Series B Preferred outstanding as of January 10, 2018, the date the redemption was announced, were converted into 3.1 shares of the Company’scash or Post common stock. TheUpon expiration of each agreement, if the closing market price of Post’s common stock is above the predetermined price, the Company will have the initial investment returned with a premium in cash. If the closing market price of Post’s common stock is at or below the predetermined price, the Company will receive the number of shares of common stock exchangedspecified in the transaction was based upon the current conversion rate, under the Certificate of Designation, Rights and Preferences for the Series B Preferred, of 2.1192 shares of common stock per share of Series B Preferred. The remaining shares of Series B Preferred were redeemed.
Common Stock
agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company repurchased 2.8 shares of its common stock at an average share price of $76.21 per share for a total cost of $218.7, including brokers’ commissions. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company repurchased 4.0 shares of its common stock at an average share price of $79.53 per share for a total cost of $317.8, including brokers’ commissions. These share repurchases were recorded as “Treasury stock, at cost” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In March 2016,2020, the Company entered into a structured share repurchase arrangement which required cash payments totaling $28.3, including transaction-related fees$46.4, which were recorded as “Additional paid-in capital” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2020 and as “Cash paid for stock repurchase contracts” in the Consolidated Statement of $0.2. AtCash Flows for year ended September 30, 2020. This arrangement will settle in November 2020 (subsequent to the May 2016 expirationend of the agreement,period) and will result in the market pricereceipt of either 0.6 shares of Post’s common stock exceeded the pre-determined contract price, resulting inor cash payments to the Company of $29.4.$47.5.
NOTE 22 — SEGMENTS
During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company reorganized its operating segments, which resulted in reorganized reportable segments in accordance with ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting.” At September 30, 2018,2020, the Company’s reportable segments were as follows:
•Post Consumer Brands: North American RTE cereal business;cereal;
•Weetabix: primarily U.K. RTE cereal and the branded muesli business sold and distributed primarily outside of North America;muesli;
Refrigerated Food: refrigerated foodservice,•Foodservice: primarily egg and potato and refrigerated retail, inclusive ofproducts;
•Refrigerated Retail: primarily side dishes,dish, egg, cheese and sausage;sausage products; and
Active Nutrition:•BellRing Brands: RTD protein shakes, bars andother RTD beverages, powders and nutritional supplements;nutrition bars.
Due to the level of integration between the Foodservice and
Private Brands: peanut Refrigerated Retail segments, it is impracticable to present additions to property and other nut butters, dried fruitintangibles and nut products, granola and pasta.
All historical segment results reported herein havetotal assets separately for each segment. An allocation has been reclassified to conform withmade between the September 30, 2018 presentation.two segments for depreciation based on inventory costing.
Management evaluates each segment’s performance based on its segment profit, which is its operating profitearnings before income taxes and equity method earnings/loss before impairment of property, goodwill and other intangible assets, facility closure related costs, restructuring expenses, (gains)/lossesgain/loss on assets and liabilities held for sale, (gains)/lossesgain/loss on salesales of businesses and facilities, gain on bargain purchase, interest expense and other unallocated corporate income and expenses.
In fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, Post’s external revenues were primarily generated by sales within the United States;U.S.; foreign (primarily located in the United KingdomU.K. and Canada) sales were approximately 13%13.9%, 12.8% and 12.9% of total fiscal 2018 net sales.sales, respectively. Sales are attributed to individual countries based on the address to which the product is shipped.
As of September 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the majority of Post’s tangible long-lived assets were located in the United States;U.S.; the remainder arewere located primarily in the United KingdomU.K. and Canada which combined have a net carrying value of approximately $284.3$294.2 and $311.1,$279.0, respectively. Additionally, the Company had tangible long-lived assets located in Canada of $12.4, which were classified as held for sale at September 30, 2018.
In the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, one customer, including its affiliates, accounted for $784.6, $704.120.9%, 20.9% and $668.8,17.6%, respectively, or approximately 13%, of total net sales in each year.sales. All segments, except Weetabix, sellFoodservice, sold products to this major customer.customer or its affiliates.
The following tables present information about the Company’s reportable segments. In addition, the tables present net sales by product. The historical Private Brands segment manufactured and distributed private label peanut and other nut butters, dried fruit and nut products, granola and pasta. Net sales for the years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 are presented under ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and net sales for the year ended September 30, 2018 are presented under ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.” Note that “Additionsadditions to property and intangibles” excludesintangibles exclude additions through business acquisitions (see Note 4).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net Sales | | | | | |
| | Post Consumer Brands | $ | 1,831.7 |
| | $ | 1,742.5 |
| | $ | 1,728.2 |
|
| | Weetabix | 423.4 |
| | 112.4 |
| | — |
|
| | Refrigerated Food | 2,337.9 |
| | 1,870.8 |
| | 1,917.4 |
|
| | Active Nutrition | 827.5 |
| | 713.2 |
| | 574.7 |
|
| | Private Brands | 848.9 |
| | 791.2 |
| | 811.1 |
|
| | Eliminations | (12.2 | ) | | (4.3 | ) | | (4.6 | ) |
| | Total | $ | 6,257.2 |
| | $ | 5,225.8 |
| | $ | 5,026.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net Sales | | | | | |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 1,949.1 | | | $ | 1,875.9 | | | $ | 1,831.7 | |
| Weetabix | 440.4 | | | 418.2 | | | 423.4 | |
| Foodservice | 1,361.8 | | | 1,627.4 | | | 1,548.2 | |
| Refrigerated Retail | 961.2 | | | 907.3 | | | 790.9 | |
| BellRing Brands | 988.3 | | | 854.4 | | | 827.5 | |
| Private Brands | 0 | | | 0 | | | 848.9 | |
| Eliminations | (2.1) | | | (2.1) | | | (13.4) | |
| Total | $ | 5,698.7 | | | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 6,257.2 | |
| Segment Profit | | | | | |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 393.5 | | | $ | 337.1 | | | $ | 329.2 | |
| Weetabix | 112.3 | | | 94.8 | | | 87.2 | |
| Foodservice | 25.6 | | | 198.4 | | | 157.6 | |
| Refrigerated Retail | 125.6 | | | 95.1 | | | 90.0 | |
| BellRing Brands | 164.0 | | | 175.1 | | | 124.4 | |
| Private Brands | 0 | | | 0 | | | 60.8 | |
| Total segment profit | 821.0 | | | 900.5 | | | 849.2 | |
| General corporate expenses and other | 109.0 | | | 169.6 | | | 136.8 | |
| Gain on sale of business | 0 | | | (126.6) | | | 0 | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | 0 | | | 63.3 | | | 124.9 | |
| Interest expense, net | 388.6 | | | 322.4 | | | 387.3 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 72.9 | | | 6.1 | | | 31.1 | |
| Expense (income) on swaps, net | 187.1 | | | 306.6 | | | (95.6) | |
| Earnings before income taxes and equity method loss | $ | 63.4 | | | $ | 159.1 | | | $ | 264.7 | |
| Net sales by product | | | | | |
| Cereal and granola | $ | 2,388.7 | | | $ | 2,293.3 | | | $ | 2,351.2 | |
| Eggs and egg products | 1,307.8 | | | 1,578.4 | | | 1,542.8 | |
| Side dishes (including potato products) | 536.6 | | | 519.6 | | | 398.2 | |
| Cheese and dairy | 253.2 | | | 234.6 | | | 248.6 | |
| Sausage | 168.1 | | | 149.6 | | | 96.0 | |
| Protein-based products and supplements | 988.7 | | | 854.7 | | | 827.5 | |
| Nut butters and dried fruit and nut | 0 | | | 0 | | | 487.5 | |
| Pasta | 0 | | | 0 | | | 258.4 | |
| Other | 57.3 | | | 52.5 | | | 53.0 | |
| Eliminations | (1.7) | | | (1.6) | | | (6.0) | |
| Total | $ | 5,698.7 | | | $ | 5,681.1 | | | $ | 6,257.2 | |
| Additions to property and intangibles | | | | | |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 67.4 | | | $ | 62.1 | | | $ | 51.5 | |
| Weetabix | 24.6 | | | 37.7 | | | 26.3 | |
| Foodservice and Refrigerated Retail | 139.5 | | | 162.3 | | | 114.6 | |
| BellRing Brands | 2.1 | | | 3.2 | | | 5.0 | |
| Private Brands | 0 | | | 0 | | | 26.6 | |
| Corporate | 1.0 | | | 8.6 | | | 1.0 | |
| Total | $ | 234.6 | | | $ | 273.9 | | | $ | 225.0 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 112.4 | | | $ | 117.4 | | | $ | 122.0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Segment Profit | | | | | |
| | Post Consumer Brands | $ | 329.2 |
| | $ | 354.9 |
| | $ | 290.4 |
|
| | Weetabix | 87.2 |
| | 14.5 |
| | — |
|
| | Refrigerated Food | 247.6 |
| | 110.6 |
| | 245.7 |
|
| | Active Nutrition | 124.4 |
| | 96.4 |
| | 44.7 |
|
| | Private Brands | 60.8 |
| | 58.1 |
| | 71.4 |
|
| | Total segment profit | 849.2 |
| | 634.5 |
| | 652.2 |
|
| General corporate expenses and other | 136.8 |
| | 87.7 |
| | 106.5 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | 124.9 |
| | 26.5 |
| | — |
|
| Interest expense, net | 387.3 |
| | 314.8 |
| | 306.5 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 31.1 |
| | 222.9 |
| | 86.4 |
|
| (Income) expense on swaps, net | (95.6 | ) | | (91.8 | ) | | 182.9 |
|
| Earnings (loss) before income taxes and equity method loss | $ | 264.7 |
| | $ | 74.4 |
| | $ | (30.1 | ) |
| Net sales by product | | | | | |
| | Cereal and granola | $ | 2,351.2 |
| | $ | 1,963.9 |
| | $ | 1,838.5 |
|
| | Egg and egg products | 1,542.8 |
| | 1,419.1 |
| | 1,417.0 |
|
| | Cheese and dairy | 248.6 |
| | 259.4 |
| | 320.9 |
|
| | Side dishes | 398.2 |
| | 192.3 |
| | 179.5 |
|
| | Sausage | 96.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Pasta | 258.4 |
| | 249.4 |
| | 270.6 |
|
| | Protein-based products and supplements | 827.5 |
| | 713.2 |
| | 574.7 |
|
| | Nut butters and dried fruit and nut | 487.5 |
| | 432.5 |
| | 429.1 |
|
| | Other | 53.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| | Eliminations | (6.0 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | | (3.5 | ) |
| | Total | $ | 6,257.2 |
| | $ | 5,225.8 |
| | $ | 5,026.8 |
|
| Additions to property and intangibles | | | | | |
| | Post Consumer Brands | $ | 51.5 |
| | $ | 57.8 |
| | $ | 34.8 |
|
| | Weetabix | 26.3 |
| | 13.6 |
| | — |
|
| | Refrigerated Food | 114.6 |
| | 66.0 |
| | 51.6 |
|
| | Active Nutrition | 5.0 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 4.4 |
|
| | Private Brands | 26.6 |
| | 29.1 |
| | 23.5 |
|
| | Corporate | 1.0 |
| | 20.0 |
| | 7.2 |
|
| | Total | $ | 225.0 |
| | $ | 190.4 |
| | $ | 121.5 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | |
| | Post Consumer Brands | $ | 122.0 |
| | $ | 112.4 |
| | $ | 105.5 |
|
| | Weetabix | 38.1 |
| | 7.7 |
| | — |
|
| | Refrigerated Food | 163.3 |
| | 125.4 |
| | 119.9 |
|
| | Active Nutrition | 25.9 |
| | 25.3 |
| | 25.0 |
|
| | Private Brands | 40.9 |
| | 48.6 |
| | 46.4 |
|
| | | Total segment depreciation and amortization | 390.2 |
| | 319.4 |
| | 296.8 |
|
| | Corporate and accelerated depreciation | 8.2 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 6.0 |
|
| | Total | $ | 398.4 |
| | $ | 323.1 |
| | $ | 302.8 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | September 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Assets, end of year | | | | | |
| | Post Consumer Brands | $ | 3,391.7 |
| | $ | 3,440.5 |
| | $ | 3,387.0 |
|
| | Weetabix | 1,853.3 |
| | 2,048.9 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weetabix | 35.9 | | | 35.0 | | | 38.1 | |
| Foodservice | 119.6 | | | 111.8 | | | 105.4 | |
| Refrigerated Retail | 73.1 | | | 74.1 | | | 57.9 | |
| BellRing Brands | 25.3 | | | 25.3 | | | 25.9 | |
| Private Brands | 0 | | | 0 | | | 40.9 | |
| | Total segment depreciation and amortization | 366.3 | | | 363.6 | | | 390.2 | |
| Corporate and accelerated depreciation | 4.0 | | | 16.0 | | | 8.2 | |
| Total | $ | 370.3 | | | $ | 379.6 | | | $ | 398.4 | |
| | | | | |
| September 30, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Assets, end of year | | | | | |
| Post Consumer Brands | $ | 3,291.7 | | | $ | 3,296.3 | | | $ | 3,391.7 | |
| Weetabix | 1,864.5 | | | 1,779.1 | | | 1,853.3 | |
| Foodservice and Refrigerated Retail | 5,022.0 | | | 5,033.8 | | | 5,132.4 | |
| BellRing Brands | 653.5 | | | 594.0 | | | 559.3 | |
| Private Brands | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,055.3 | |
| Corporate | 1,315.0 | | | 1,248.4 | | | 1,065.5 | |
| Total | $ | 12,146.7 | | | $ | 11,951.6 | | | $ | 13,057.5 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Refrigerated Food | 5,132.4 |
| | 3,176.0 |
| | 3,099.3 |
|
| | Active Nutrition | 559.3 |
| | 581.3 |
| | 624.8 |
|
| | Private Brands | 1,055.3 |
| | 1,054.9 |
| | 1,054.7 |
|
| | Corporate | 1,065.5 |
| | 1,575.2 |
| | 1,194.8 |
|
| | Total | $ | 13,057.5 |
| | $ | 11,876.8 |
| | $ | 9,360.6 |
|
NOTE 23 — SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| Quarter | | Quarter | | Quarter | | Quarter |
| Fiscal 2020 | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 1,456.8 | | | $ | 1,494.2 | | | $ | 1,336.4 | | | $ | 1,411.3 | |
| Gross profit | 471.5 | | | 438.8 | | | 436.8 | | | 440.3 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net earnings (loss) | 99.2 | | | (191.4) | | | 36.0 | | | 57.0 | |
| Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders | 99.2 | | | (191.4) | | | 36.0 | | | 57.0 | |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 1.40 | | | $ | (2.76) | | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.85 | |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | (2.76) | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.83 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2019 | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 1,411.3 | | | $ | 1,387.8 | | | $ | 1,439.2 | | | $ | 1,442.8 | |
| Gross profit | 426.5 | | | 451.3 | | | 462.1 | | | 452.2 | |
| (Gain) loss on sale of business | (124.7) | | | (2.6) | | | 0 | | | 0.7 | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 63.3 | |
| Net earnings (loss) | 125.6 | | | 44.0 | | | 16.2 | | | (61.1) | |
| Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders | 123.6 | | | 43.0 | | | 16.2 | | | (61.1) | |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 1.85 | | | $ | 0.61 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | (0.84) | |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 1.67 | | | $ | 0.58 | | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | (0.84) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| | Quarter | | Quarter | | Quarter | | Quarter |
| Fiscal 2018 | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 1,433.1 |
| | $ | 1,586.1 |
| | $ | 1,608.1 |
| | $ | 1,629.9 |
|
| Gross profit | 451.7 |
| | 475.7 |
| | 461.4 |
| | 478.0 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 124.9 |
|
| Net earnings (loss) | 294.9 |
| | 91.5 |
| | 96.5 |
| | (15.6 | ) |
| Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders | 291.5 |
| | 88.9 |
| | 94.5 |
| | (17.6 | ) |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 4.42 |
| | $ | 1.33 |
| | $ | 1.41 |
| | $ | (0.26 | ) |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 3.82 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.29 |
| | $ | (0.26 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2017 | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 1,249.8 |
| | $ | 1,255.4 |
| | $ | 1,272.1 |
| | $ | 1,448.5 |
|
| Gross profit | 379.2 |
| | 364.1 |
| | 393.7 |
| | 437.1 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26.5 |
|
| Net earnings (loss) | 101.8 |
| | (2.1 | ) | | (59.4 | ) | | 8.0 |
|
| Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders | 98.4 |
| | (5.5 | ) | | (62.8 | ) | | 4.7 |
|
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.93 | ) | | $ | 0.07 |
|
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 1.27 |
| | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.93 | ) | | $ | 0.07 |
|
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with theour Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the Company,, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act)Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
In fiscal 2018, we completed the acquisition of Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Bob Evans”). We have excluded the portion of the Bob Evans business, which was a purchase business combination, that was not integrated into the existing Michael Foods business from our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Total assets excluding goodwill and intangible assets (which is included in control testing) for Bob Evans represent $292.9 million, or 2%, of consolidated assets as of September 30, 2018. Total third party revenues for Bob Evans represent $315.7 million, or 5%, of consolidated revenues for the year ended September 30, 2018.
As of September 30, 2018,2020, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based upon the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on management'smanagement’s assessment utilizing these criteria, our management concluded that, as of September 30, 2018,2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20182020 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report, which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We evaluated the changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 20182020 and concluded the followingthat no activity has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Bob Evans in fiscal 2018, management is in the process of analyzing, evaluating and, where necessary, implementing changes in controls and procedures. As a result, the process may result in additions or changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Bob Evans is excluded from management’s report on internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information regarding directorsrequired by this Item, appearing under the headings “Election of Directors – Information about the Current Directors and Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors,” “Corporate Governance – Board Meetings and Committees,” “Corporate Governance – Nomination Process for Election of Directors” and “Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders – Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” in the Company’s 2019 Noticedefinitive proxy statement for its 2021 annual meeting of Annual Meetingshareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after September 30, 2020 (the “2021 Proxy StatementStatement”), is hereby incorporated by reference. Information regarding executive officers of the Company is included inunder the “Executive Officers of the Registrant” section underheading “Information about our Executive Officers” in “Business” in Item 1 of this report.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics, our Code of Conduct, applicable to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, which sets forth the Company’s expectations for the conduct of business by our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.postholdings.com. In the event the Company modifies this documentamends the Code of Conduct or waivers of compliance are granted and it is determined that such amendments or waivers are subject to executive officers or directors,the disclosure provisions of Item 5.05 of Form 8-K, the Company will post such modificationsamendments or waivers on its website or in a report on Form 8-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
InformationThe information required by this Item, appearing under the headings “Compensation of Officers and Directors,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Report” in the Company’s 2019 Notice of Annual Meeting and2021 Proxy Statement, is hereby incorporated by reference.
| |
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS |
The discussioninformation contained in “Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Report” in the 2021 Proxy Statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to the liabilities of the security ownershipSecurities Exchange Act of certain beneficial owners and management1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item, appearing under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders”Shareholders – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,” “Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders – Security Ownership of Management” and equity compensation plan information under the heading “Compensation of Officers and Directors – Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Company’s 2019 Notice of Annual Meeting and2021 Proxy Statement, is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
InformationThe information required by this Item, appearing under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance – Director Independence and Role of the Independent Lead Director” in the Company’s 2019 Notice of Annual Meeting and2021 Proxy Statement, is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item, appearing under the heading “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Company’s 2019 Notice of Annual Meeting and2021 Proxy Statement, is hereby incorporated by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Documents filed as a part of this report:
| |
1. | Financial Statements. The following are filed as a part of this document under Item 8.
|
1.Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements of Post Holdings, Inc. are filed as a part of this document under Item 8.
•Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
•Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018
•Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018
•Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 20182020 and 20172019
•Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018
•Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018
•Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2.Financial Statement Schedules. None. Schedules not included have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
3.Exhibits.
| | | | | | | | |
2.Exhibit No. | | Description |
| 3.1 | | |
| 3.2 | | |
| 3.3 | | |
| 4.1 | | |
| 4.2 | | |
| 4.3 | | |
| 4.4 | | |
| 4.5 | | |
| 4.6 | | |
| 4.7 | | |
†10.1 | | |
†10.2 | | |
†10.3 | | |
†10.4 | | |
| †10.5 | | |
| †10.6 | | |
| †10.7 | | |
| †10.8 | | |
†10.9 | | |
†10.10 | | |
†10.11 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
3.Exhibit No. | | Description |
†10.12 | | |
†10.13 | | |
†10.14 | | |
†10.15 | | |
†10.16 | | |
†10.17 | | |
†10.18 | | |
†10.19 | | |
†10.20 | | |
†10.21 | | |
†10.22 | | |
†10.23 | | |
†10.24 | | |
| 10.25 | | |
†10.26 | | |
| 10.27 | | First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2018, by and among 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc., the Subsidiaries of 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, Barclays Bank PLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, CitiGroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint bookrunners, and Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch and SunTrust Bank, as documentation agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s second Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2018) |
| 10.28 | | Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2018, by and among 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc., the Subsidiaries of 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, Barclays Bank PLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, CitiGroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint bookrunners, and Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch and SunTrust Bank, as documentation agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s second Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2018) |
†10.29 | | |
| †10.30 | | |
| †10.31 | | |
| †10.32 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Description |
| †10.33 | | |
| †10.34 | | |
| †10.35 | | |
| 10.36 | | |
| †10.37 | | |
| †10.38 | | |
| †10.39 | | |
| 10.40 | | |
| 10.41 | | Bridge Facility Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2019, by and among Post Holdings, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Post Holdings, Inc., as guarantors, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as joint lead arrangers and joint physical bookrunners, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 11, 2019) |
| 10.42 | | |
| 10.43 | | |
| 10.44 | | Borrower Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2019, by and among Post Holdings, Inc., BellRing Brands, LLC and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Form 8-K filed by BellRing Brands, Inc. on October 21, 2019 (File No. 001-39093)) |
| 10.45 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2019, by and among BellRing Brands, LLC, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Barclays Bank PLC, Citibank, N.A., Goldman Sachs Bank USA and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch, Nomura Securities International, Inc., Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., UBS Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as co-managers, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Form 8-K filed by BellRing Brands, Inc. on October 21, 2019 (File No. 001-39093)) |
| †10.46 | | |
| †10.47 | | |
| 10.48 | | |
| 10.49 | | Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2020, by and among Post Holdings, Inc., as borrower, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, Barclays Bank PLC, BofA Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, BofA Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as syndication agents, and Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2020) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Description |
| 10.50 | | |
| 21.1 | | |
| 23.1 | | |
| 24.1 | | |
| 31.1 | | |
| 31.2 | | |
| 32.1 | | |
| 101.INS | | The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document |
| 101.SCH | | iXBRL (Inline XBRL) Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| 101.CAL | | iXBRL (Inline XBRL) Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF | | iXBRL (Inline XBRL) Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB | | iXBRL (Inline XBRL) Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| 101.PRE | | iXBRL (Inline XBRL) Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| 104 | | The cover page from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2020, formatted in iXBRL (Inline XBRL) and contained in Exhibit 101 |
| | | | | |
| † | These exhibits constitute management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements. |
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Post Holdings, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | POST HOLDINGS, INC. |
| | | | |
|
| | | POST HOLDINGS, INC. |
| By: | | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ Robert V. Vitale |
| | | | Robert V. Vitale |
| | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
November 16, 201820, 2020
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jeff A. Zadoks and Diedre J. Gray, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-factattorneys-in-fact and agent,agents, with full power of substitution and resolution,resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with any and all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
| /s/ Robert V. Vitale | | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) | | November 20, 2020 |
| Robert V. Vitale | | | |
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ Robert V. Vitale | | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
| | November 16, 2018 |
Robert V. Vitale | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Jeff A. Zadoks | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer) | | November 16, 201820, 2020 |
| Jeff A. Zadoks | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ William P. Stiritz | | Chairman of the Board | | November 16, 2018 |
William P. Stiritz | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Jay W. Brown | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
Jay W. Brown | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Edwin H. Callison | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
Edwin H. Callison | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Gregory L. Curl | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
Gregory L. Curl | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Robert E. Grote | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
Robert E. Grote | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Ellen F. Harshman | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
Ellen F. Harshman | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ David W. Kemper | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
David W. Kemper | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ David P. Skarie | | Director | | November 16, 2018 |
David P. Skarie | | | | |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
*‡2.1
/s/ Bradly A. Harper | | Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer) | | November 20, 2020 |
*‡2.2
Bradly A. Harper | | |
*‡2.3
| | |
*‡2.4
| | |
*3.1 | | |
*3.2 | | |
*3.3 | | |
*4.1 | |
|
*4.2 | | |
*4.3 | | |
*4.4 | | |
*4.5 | | |
*4.6 | | |
*4.7 | | |
*†10.1
| | |
*†10.2
| | |
*†10.3
| | |
*†10.4
| | |
*†10.5
| | |
*†10.6
| | |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
*†10.7
/s/ William P. Stiritz | | Board | | November 20, 2020 |
*†10.8
William P. Stiritz | | |
*†10.9 | | |
*†10.10 | | |
*†10.11 | | |
*†10.12 | | |
*10.13 | | |
*†10.14 | | |
*†10.15 | | |
*†10.16
| | |
*†10.17
| | |
*†10.18
| | |
*†10.19
| | |
*†10.20
| | |
*†10.21
| | |
*†10.22
| | |
*†10.23
| | |
*†10.24
| | |
*†10.25
| | |
*†10.26
| | |
*†10.27
| | |
*†10.28
| | |
*†10.29
| | |
*†10.30
| | |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
*10.31/s/ Jay W. Brown | | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2017, by and among Post Holdings, Inc.,the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, Barclays Bank PLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Syndication Agents, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Documentation Agents, and Barclays Bank, PLC as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2017) | | November 20, 2020 |
*10.32Jay W. Brown | | |
*10.33 | | |
*10.34 | | |
*†10.35
| | |
*†10.36
| | |
*†10.37
| | |
*†10.38
| | |
*†10.39
| | |
*†10.40
| | |
*10.41 | | |
*†10.42
| | |
*†10.43
| | |
*†10.44
| | |
*10.45 | | |
*10.46 | | Bridge Facility Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2018, by and among Post Holdings, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Post Holdings, Inc., as guarantors, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, Barclays Bank PLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Physical Bookrunners, and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2018) |
*10.47 | | |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
*10.48/s/ Dorothy M. Burwell | | First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2018, by and among 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc., the Subsidiaries of 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent, Barclays Bank PLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, CitiGroup Global Markets Inc., and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Bookrunners, and Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch and SunTrust Bank, as Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2018) | | November 20, 2020 |
*10.49Dorothy M. Burwell | | Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2018, by and among 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc., the Subsidiaries of 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent, Barclays Bank PLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, CitiGroup Global Markets Inc., and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Bookrunners, and Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch and SunTrust Bank, as Documentation Agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2018) |
**†10.50
| | |
**†10.51
| | |
**21.1 | | |
**23.1 | | |
**24.1 | | Power of Attorney (Included under Signatures) |
**31.1 | | |
**31.2 | | |
**32.1 | | |
**101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
**101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
**101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
**101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
**101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
**101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
| |
* | Incorporated by reference | |
**/s/ Edwin H. Callison | Furnished with this Form 10-K | Director | | November 20, 2020 |
†Edwin H. Callison | These exhibits constitute management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements. | | | |
‡ | Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company hereby undertakes to furnish copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
| | | |
| /s/ Gregory L. Curl | | Director | | November 20, 2020 |
| Gregory L. Curl | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Robert E. Grote | | Director | | November 20, 2020 |
| Robert E. Grote | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Ellen F. Harshman | | Director | | November 20, 2020 |
| Ellen F. Harshman | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ David W. Kemper | | Director | | November 20, 2020 |
| David W. Kemper | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ David P. Skarie | | Director | | November 20, 2020 |
| David P. Skarie | | | | |
