UNITED STATES

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 000-26533

MASTERMIND, INC.

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

o

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to


Commission File No. 000-26533

CoConnect, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

 

82-3807447

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3651 Lindell Road, Las Vegas, NV

 

89103

1450 W. Peachtree St. NW, Atlanta, Georgia

30309

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone numbernumber: (424) 256-8560(678) 420-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareAct:

Title of each class

Trading symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

MMND

OTCQB

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports).    Yeso  Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yesx      Noo

Indicate

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yeso     Nox

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    q

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act (Check one)Exchange Act. :

Large Accelerated Filer

oaccelerated filer ☐

Accelerated Filer

ofiler ☐

Non-accelerated Filer

ofiler ☒

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company ☐

o

Emerging growth company.    x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use to the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yesx Noo

As of December 31, 2017, there were 4,633,761 shares

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding. Aseffectiveness of June 30, 2017, the last business dayits internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the registrant’s most recent completed second quarter,Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 USC. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stockcommon stock held by non-affiliates on March 31, 2020 was $2,316,881 (computed using the closing price of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) was approximately $17,554,000 basedcommon stock on the last sale priceMarch 31, 2020 as reported by the Over-The-Counter-Bulletin-Board on such date.OTCQB).





As of February 18, 2021, 34,505,520 shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding.





COCONNECT,Mastermind, Inc.

FORM

Table of Contents

Form 10-K

FOR THE YEAR ENDEDDecember 31, 2016

INDEX

PART I

 

 

Page

Item 1.Part I

 

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

5

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

5

Item 2.

Properties

5

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

5

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

5

PART II

 

 

 

Item 5.1

Business

3

Item 1A

Risk Factors

10

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

10

Item 2

Properties

10

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

10

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

10

 

Part II

Item 5

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

611

Item 6.

6

Selected Financial Data

712

Item 7.

7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

712

Item 7A.

7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

1015

Item 8.

8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

1115

Item 9.

9

Changes Inin and Disagreements With AccountantsAccountant on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosures

1115

Item 9A.

9A

Controls and Procedures

1115

Item 9B.

9B

Other Information

1216

PART

Part III

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

1317

Item 11.

11

Executive Compensation

1418

Item 12.

12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

1519

Item 13.

13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

1619

Item 14.

14

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

1720

PART

Part IV

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

15

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

22

Item 16

18Form 10–K Summary

22

 

 

 

Signatures

 

23




- 2 -






PARTPart I

Item 1.      Business

Business

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) contains certainforward-looking statements in the sections captioned “Description of Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operations” and elsewhere. Any and all statements contained in this Report that are “forward-looking” within the meaningnot statements of the federal securities laws. Thesehistorical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements and other information are based on our beliefsstatements. Terms such as well as assumptions made by us using information currently available.

The words“may,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “project,” “estimate,” “pro-forma,” “predict,” “potential,” “strategy,” “anticipate,” “attempt,” “develop,” “plan,” “help,” “believe,” “estimate,“continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “intend,“future,“will,” “should” and terms of similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended toimport (including the negative of any of these terms) may identify forward-looking statements. SuchHowever, not all forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and are not guaranties of future performance. Shouldmay contain one or more of these risksidentifying terms. Forward-looking statements in this Report may include, without limitation, statements regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations, projections of income or uncertainties materialize,loss, earnings or shouldloss per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items, our future financial performance, including any such statement contained in a discussion and analysis of financial condition by management or in the results of operations included pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the assumptions underlying assumptions prove incorrect,or relating to any such statement.

The forward-looking statements are not meant to predict or guarantee actual results, performance, events or circumstances and may varynot be realized because they are based upon our current projections, plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, estimates and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other influences, many of which we have no control over. Actual results and the timing of certain events and circumstances may differ materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or using other similar expressions.We are making investors aware that suchby the forward-looking statements because they relateas a result of these risks and uncertainties. Factors that may influence or contribute to future events, are by their very nature subject to many important factors that couldthe accuracy of the forward-looking statements or cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Important factors that could cause actualexpected or desired results to differ from our predictionsmay include, those discussed under “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and “Business.” Although we have sought to identify the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized, nor can there be any assurance that we have identified all possible issues which we might face. For all of these reasons, the reader iswithout limitation:

Market acceptance of our products and services;

Competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;

The implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business and our products;

Estimates of our future revenue, expenses, capital requirements and our need for financing;

Our financial performance;

Current and future government regulations;

Developments relating to our competitors; and

Other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the section titled “Risk Factors.”

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only asbecause of the date hereof.risks and uncertainties related to them and to the risk factors. We assume no responsibilitydisclaim any obligation to update anythe forward-looking statements as a result ofcontained in this Report to reflect any new information or future events or circumstances or otherwise, except as required by law. We urge readers to review carefullyReaders should read this Report in conjunction with the risk factors describeddiscussion under the caption “Risk Factors,” our financial statements and the related notes thereto in this Annual Report, and other documents which we may file from time to time with the SEC.

General

Overview

Mastermind Involvement Marketing, a Georgia joint venture (the “Company” or “MIM”) was formed on January 1, 2012 by Mastermind Marketing, Inc, a Georgia Corporation (“MM Inc.”), the founding member, through a contribution of assets. The organization, as governed by the written operating agreement dated January 1, 2012, as amended, (the “Operating Agreement”) was formed for the purpose of engaging in the other documentsbusiness of conceiving, developing, selling, marketing, implementing and/or otherwise providing services, systems, platforms and products in the areas of mobile, social, digital and traditional marketing to and for businesses and organizations, and conducting services and functions incidental to the operation of such business.

We are an involvement marketing service agency that we filedesigns, creates and develops branding and marketing campaigns, primarily for large corporate clients with category-leading brands. We specialize in getting consumers and customers to take an action that leads to brand awareness, trial, loyalty, and ultimately advocacy (e.g. publicly “endorsing” the brand via digital/social media through reviews, likes, etc.). Our conversion initiatives facilitate the involvement of more of the “right customers” with the Securitiesbrands of our clients. Our programs can take on various forms, including creating and Exchange Commission. You can read these documents atmanaging digital content, designing campaign websites/landing pages, social media and viral campaigns, mobile marketing initiatives, and brand communications.

3

History

www.sec.govThe Business Combination

On February 14, 2018 (the “Closing Date”), we consummated the transactions contemplated by the Joint Venture Interest Contribution Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) made and entered into as of February 14, 2018 by and among (i) the Company; (ii) CoConnect Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“CoConnect”), and (iii) Mastermind Marketing, Inc, a Georgia Corporation (“MM Inc.”), Digital Advize, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Advize”), and Villanta Corporation, a Georgia Corporation (“Villanta”, together with Advize and MM Inc., the “Sellers”).

Where we say “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company”

Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement, the Sellers contributed, transferred, assigned and conveyed to CoConnect all right, title and interest in and to one hundred percent (100%) of such joint venture interest in the Company (the “Contributed Joint Venture Interest”), together with any and all rights, privileges, benefits, obligations and liabilities appertaining thereto, reserving unto such Seller no rights or “CoConnect,” we meaninterests therein whatsoever, and CoConnect Inc.

Corporate History

The Company was originally incorporated in Alabama in December 1997. Our original business plan was to take overaccepted the assets of businesses involved in reorganizations through bankruptcies.

In 1997, we acquired Mobile Limited Liability Company as partcontribution of the confirmationContributed Joint Venture Interest, and in consideration for such contribution the Sellers collectively were entitled to receive from CoConnect twenty-nine million two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred fifty-nine (29,236,759) shares of our Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11CoConnect ’s common stock, $.001 par value (the “CoConnect Common Stock”) representing eighty-five percent (85%) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code bytotal outstanding CoConnect Common Stock after the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. On August 6, 2000, we acquired allissuance of the assetsContribution Consideration (the “Contribution Consideration”) with each Seller receiving for its respective percentage of Digital Wireless Systems, Inc. as partContributed Joint Venture Interest that same percentage of the consummation of our confirmed Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 ofContribution Consideration (such transaction, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Lack of funding forced us to abandon plans to revive the operations of both of these companies.

In 2000, we acquired three operating subsidiaries: Daybreak Auto Recovery, Inc., Rap Group and Voltage Vehicles. In 2002, we rescinded these acquisitions, and in October 2004, we cancelled the common shares that were to be issued for the acquisitions, which shares had been held in escrow. During 2002 and 2003, we had no operations other than to continue our efforts to liquidate certain telecommunications licenses, our only assets, in order to pay creditors who had judgments arising out of the aforementioned bankruptcies.

In August 2004, we reincorporated from Alabama to Nevada and changed our name to Advanced Wireless Communications, Inc.

On October 5, 2004, we signed a definitive agreement with Heritage Communications, Inc. (“Heritage”“Business Combination”) and acquired an exclusive license for the marketing and distribution of products over Heritage’s proprietary high-speed wireless network.

On January 28, 2005, we executed a share exchange agreement with Heritage and its stockholders. The share exchange agreement closed on February 23, 2005 and superseded the exclusive license with Heritage by making Heritage our wholly owned subsidiary.

In February 2005, we changed our name to CoConnect, Inc.

On July 14, 2005, we rescinded the share exchange agreement with Heritage due to material omissions and misrepresentations that had been made by Heritage.. As a result of the rescission, we cancelledBusiness Combination, the 30,000,000 sharesSellers became the controlling shareholders of common stock previously issuedCoConnect and CoConnect became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

As used in this Report, unless otherwise stated or the context clearly indicates otherwise, the terms “Registrant,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the stockholders of Heritage.Company, giving effect to the Business Combination.

Contribution Agreement and Related Transactions

The Contribution Agreement

On December 21, 2005, through our newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Phoenix Asset Acquisition Corporation,February 14, 2018 (the “Closing Date”), we purchased selected assets of Phoenix Systems Corp. (“Phoenix”). The termsconsummated the transactions contemplated by that certain Contribution Agreement by and among the Company, CoConnect, and the Sellers.

Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement the Sellers contributed, transferred, assigned and conveyed to the Company all right, title and interest in and to the Contributed Joint Venture Interest, together with any and all rights, privileges, benefits, obligations and liabilities appertaining thereto, reserving unto such Seller no rights or interests therein whatsoever, and (ii) CoConnect accepted the contribution of the purchase includedContributed Joint Venture Interest, and in consideration for such contribution the issuanceSellers collectively received from CoConnect the Contribution Consideration and consisting of 8,000,000 sharesan aggregate of common stock, of which 2,000,000 shares were being held in escrow until certain performance measures were achieved, a $50,000 cash payment, and the assumption of approximately $374,000 of Phoenix liabilities and approximately $49,000 in obligations related to real property leases. Effective December 31, 2005, the Phoenix transaction was rescinded by mutual agreement.



- 3 -





On December 12, 2008, a majorityeighty-five percent (85%) of the holdersequity of our common shares voted to authorize a 1-for-12,000 reverse split of our common stock, which became effective on January 12, 2009.the Company after distribution. As a result of the reverse split, our trading symbol was changed to “CCON” effective March 10, 2009.

Change-in-Control Transaction

On May 1, 2014, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”), PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar company (“PacificWave”), acquired 2,307,767 shares of our outstanding common stock from our stockholders of record for $210,000 (approximately $0.09 per share), plus legal fees of $20,000. The 2,307,767 shares represented approximately 83.9% of our then outstanding shares of common stock. At closing, PacificWave also transferred a numberBusiness Combination, the Sellers became the controlling shareholders of the purchased shares to certain personsCompany and entities providing services in connection with the change-in-control transaction. At the conclusion of this transaction, PacificWave and Mr. Henrik Rouf, its Managing Director and sole owner, became the owners of an aggregate of 120,000 shares of our common stock, which constituted 4.4% of the outstanding shares of common stock at that time. We were not a party to these transactions.

Additional terms of the SPA provided for the surrender and cancellation ofreceived all of the outstanding shares of our Series B preferred stock, totaling 100,000 shares in the aggregate. The SPA also stipulated that eachassets and operations of the selling stockholders waive any outstanding liabilities, claims, damages or obligations, contingent or otherwise, owed by us to the selling stockholders. Accordingly, amounts owed by us to such stockholders totaling approximately $24,000 were recorded as a contribution to additional paid-in capital on May 1, 2014.Company.

Effective May 1, 2014, our sole officer and director at that time, Mr. York Chandler (who had been previously appointed on December 31, 2013), resigned, and Mr. Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointed as our sole director, President, Secretary and Treasurer.

In connection with the aforementioned transaction with PacificWave, Mr. Yankowitz purchased 461,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $42,000 (approximately $0.09 per share) from PacificWave on May 1, 2014, reflecting approximately 16.8%Business Combination, and as part of the outstandingContribution Agreement, PacificWave Partners and Bennet J. Yankowitz, stockholders of the Company and the “Piggyback Parties”, have been granted certain piggyback registration allowing the holder to include their shares in such registration, subject to certain marketing and other limitations. As a result, if, commencing one year from the Closing of our common stock at that time. The purchase price was evidenced bythe Contribution Agreement and ending two (2) years later, whenever we propose to file a promissory note due May 1, 2019 with interest at 3% per annum and secured byregistration statement under the purchased shares. We were not a party to this transaction. PacificWave and Mr. Yankowitz did not have any relationship with us prior to the aforementioned change-in-control transaction.

Mr. Rouf also serves as our Assistant Secretary. On July 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement with PacificWave to provide consulting and investment banking services to us, in particularSecurities Act, other than with respect to raising capital for us and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates.

Current Business Operations

We currently have no operations,a demand registration or a registration statement on Forms S-4 or S-8, the Piggyback Parties are entitled to notice of the registration and have been engagedthe right to include their shares in efforts to identify an operating company to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction. As our planned principal operations have not yet commenced, our activities arethe registration, subject to significant riskslimitations that the underwriters may impose on the number of shares included in the offering and uncertainties,only if their securities are then not tradable pursuant to rule 144.

In connection with the Business Combination, and as part of the Contribution Agreement, Advize and Villanta (each, a “Subject Party”) made certain covenants regarding non-competition and non-solicitation agreements (the “Non-Competition Covenants”), in favor of the Company, MM Inc., CoConnect, and their respective successors and subsidiaries (referred to as the “Covered Parties”). Under the Non-Competition Covenants, the Subject Party and its controlled affiliates will not, without the Company’s prior written consent, (a) solicit or attempt to solicit any customer of the Covered Parties, including actively sought prospective customers of Covered Parties’ as of the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.

Management is seeking to identify an operating company and engage in a merger or business combination of some kind, or acquire assets or shares of an entity actively engaged in a business that generates sustained revenues. We are considering several potential acquisitions and are investigating various candidates to determine whether they would have the potential to add valueClosing, for the benefitpurpose of our stockholders.

We do not intend to restrict our consideration to any particular business or industry segment, and we may consider, among other businesses, finance, brokerage, insurance, transportation, communications, services, natural resources, manufacturing, media or technology. Because we have limited resources, the scope and number of suitable candidates to merge with is relatively limited. Because we may participate in a business opportunity with a newly formed firm, a firm that is in the development stage, or a firm that is entering a new phase of growth, we may incur further risk due to the inability of the target’s management to have proven its abilities or effectiveness, or the lack of an established market for the target’sproviding products or services that are the same as or similar to the inabilityproducts or services offered or provided by any Covered Parties; (b) act as a director, manager, officer or employee of any business which is the same as or essentially the same as the business conducted by any Covered Parties; or (c) solicit or recruit or attempt to reach profitability in the next few years.

Any business combinationsolicit or transactionrecruit, directly or by assisting others, any employee of any Covered Parties, whether or not such employee is a full-time employee or a temporary employee of such Covered Parties, whether or not such employment is pursuant to a written agreement and whether or not such employment is for a determined period or is at will, likely result in a significant issuance of shares and substantial dilution to our present stockholders. As it is expectedcease working for such Protected Party; provided that the closingforegoing will not prevent the placement of any general solicitation for employment not specifically directed towards employees of any Covered Parties or hiring any such person as a transaction will result inthereof.

4

The Business Combination was treated as a change in control“reverse acquisition” of the Company such transaction is expected to be accounted for as a reverse merger, with the operating company beingfinancial accounting purposes, MIM JV was considered the legal acquiree and accounting acquirer, and the Company being considered the legal acquirer and the accounting acquiree. As a result, at and subsequent to closing of any such transaction, thehistorical financial statements of the operatingCompany before the Business Combination were replaced with the historical financial statements of MIM JV and its consolidated entities before the Business Combination in all future filings with the SEC.

The issuance of CoConnect Common Stock to the Sellers, in connection with the Business Combination have not been registered under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2), which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, and Regulation D and/or Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under that section. These shares may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The foregoing description of the Contribution Agreement does not purport to be complete. For further information, please refer to the copy of the Contribution Agreement that is filed with the SEC as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2018, as amended. There are representations and warranties contained in the Contribution Agreement that were made by the parties to each other as of specific dates. The assertions embodied in these representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the Contribution Agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating their terms. Moreover, some representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date because they are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that is different from certain standards generally applicable to shareholders or were used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. For these reasons, investors should not rely on the representations and warranties in the Contribution Agreement as statements of factual information.

The Lock-Up Agreements

Pursuant to the Business Combination certain individuals were required to enter into lock-up agreements substantially in the form of lock-up agreement that is filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, as amended, dated April 20, 2018.

The Assignment and Assumption Agreements

Pursuant to the Business Combination the Company, CoConnect and the Sellers entered into an assignment and assumption agreement (the “JV Assignment Agreement”), pursuant to which the Sellers assigned all of their Membership Interest in the Company to CoConnect, and CoConnect assumed all of the duties, obligation and liabilities of the Sellers and the Company. The foregoing description of the JV Assignment Agreement does not purport to be complete. For further information, please refer to the copy of the JV Assignment Agreement that is filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2018, as amended.

Pursuant to the Business Combination the Company, CoConnect and MM Inc., entered into an assignment and assumption agreement (the “LLC Assignment Agreement”), pursuant to which the Sellers assigned all of their Membership Interest in the Mastermind Involvement Marketing, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“MIM LLC”) to CoConnect, and CoConnect assumed all of the duties, obligation and liabilities of MM Inc., and MIM LLC. The foregoing description of the LLC Assignment Agreement does not purport to be complete. MIM LLC does not have any assets, liabilities or operations. For further information, please refer to the copy of the LLC Assignment Agreement that is filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, as amended, dated April 20, 2018.

Our Mission

Our mission is to become one of the most well-respected marketing service agencies in the industry capable of involving people with Fortune 500 brands.

Our Business

We are an involvement marketing service agency that designs, creates and develops branding and marketing campaigns, primarily for large corporate clients with category-leading brands. We specialize in getting consumers and customers to take an action that leads to brand awareness, trial, loyalty, and ultimately advocacy (e.g. publicly “endorsing” the brand via digital/social media through reviews, likes, etc.). Our conversion initiatives facilitate the involvement of more of the “right customers” with the brands of our clients. Our programs can take on various forms, including creating and managing digital content, designing campaign websites/landing pages, social media and viral campaigns, mobile marketing initiatives, and brand communications.

5

We deliver innovative, result-producing campaigns to meet the business objectives of each client through any number, or combination thereof, or cutting-edge marketing initiatives:

Content marketing;

Influencer marketing – earned, owned, and paid;

Digital marketing across all screens;

Social marketing;

Gamification;

Promotion marketing;

Social Channel Optimization; and

Digital Issue Management Communications.

Our most important assets in delivering the highest-quality involvement marketing services to our clients are our highly talented and experienced people made up of technologists, strategists, and creatives who work together and represent a cross-discipline of experts. We pride ourselves in a culture of mutually-shared support and teamwork. We ensure that our team is provided the best-in-class research, equipment, technology and training in all disciplines within our proven delivery process to deliver cutting-edge initiatives the get results. We believe we are very competitive and have a winning culture that is present throughout the work we do for our clients and their brands.

Our organization has been structured in a manner to ensure a broad range of thinking, facilitate work flow, and deliver unparalleled marketing initiatives and service to our clients. We have a strong and long-lasting relationships with our clients and tenure of our key executives. Mastermind is organized in 6 key groups:

Account management;

Creative and development services;

Content studio;

Strategy, analytics & research;

Technology & campaign management; and

Agency Management and administration.

Our Process

We have a proven, five-step cyclical approach to every client engagement that ensures learning from every campaign execution is used to optimize future campaigns. The process involves:

1.

Research and Testing. - data analysis, shopper journeys, AB/MV, eye-tracking

2.

Strategy and Planning - objectives, goals, analysis

3.

Creative- UX, mobile, digital, design thinking, branding

4.

Campaign Management - Optimization, Management, SEO, PPC & lead gen

5.

Analytics and Optimization - data analysis, ROI, reporting, dashboards

Mastermind process seeks to ensure that there is continual optimization to involve people with brands in ways that inspire them to take action – consideration, trial, loyalty, and advocacy.

Industry Background and Trends

We believe that the communications industry is going through a revolutionary evolution. Technology and big data are combining with creative and strategy across new platforms and communications. Things are moving quickly and Involvement Marketing is an opportunity for brands to reach their constituencies through a plethora of new ways to communicate with its key constituencies in ways that get them to take action. It is essential to understand target audiences and how they are consuming information. Creating brand preference and getting consumers to take an action is essential in growing share for a brand and will continue to be essential in 2021 and beyond.

6

Brands are expected to bring projects in-house or outsource to smaller digital agencies, and a definitive shift in brands choosing to bring creative projects in-house for more control over budgets and resources was seen in 2016. The other trend saw brands cutting ties with bigger agencies and outsourcing work to smaller digital agencies which could deliver more specialized campaigns. It was predicted that in 2017, brands would becomecontinue to move away from larger agencies that have in the past offered a one-stop-shop for their advertising needs. With tighter budgets, brands are seeing the cost-effectiveness of having their own studio team and paying salaries versus project-based fees. Likewise, outsourcing to specialized digital outfits for lower, one-off fees is proving more financially sound for brands.

The industry will ramp up its use of digital marketing and advertising tools to streamline marketing workflow. As brands and ad agencies continue to leverage multiple channels to capture new audiences, eliminating tedious administrative tasks is high on the agenda. With digital tools, marketers and creatives are managing approval workflow and resources with greater ease and transparency allowing them to stay on top of heavy workloads and multiple projects. Some of the digital tools that the industry is moving towards are:

marketing approval workflow software;

agency approval workflow software;

project management software;

social marketing tools and software;

online proofing tools; and

resource management software.

Not only do these tools cut out time-consuming administration, but they offer greater control and visibility over managing marketing projects as well as streamline marketing workflow.

More brands and ad agencies will move towards an agile methodology to enable them to be more flexible in responding to a rapidly changing marketplace. Agile project management was developed as an alternative to the hierarchical project management model, which favors processes and documentation, and longer-term development projection. Agile methodologies, on the other hand, utilize a self-organized team model with greater flexibility in scope, face-to-face collaboration and incremental planning to deliver projects on time and on budget. Experts are expecting to see more marketers and creatives to go agile to remain competitive.

To mitigate the risk of brands being called out by regulatory bodies for illegal or unethical practices and tarnishing the brand reputation, more brands will toe the line because their bottom line depends on it. With that said, marketing compliance will be high on the agenda again this year with marketers having to stay on top of compliance issues to mitigate the risk of regulatory violations. Digital tools that enable brands to audit their project work will go a long way in helping businesses to manage their market compliance.

While every brand and ad agency needs highly skilled individuals on board, there will be a return to focus on teams to propel businesses forward. Rather than focusing on individuals, it is believed that agency ROI’s could benefit by nurturing teams and their skillsets, setting processes that ease heavy workloads, delegating tasks evenly and ensuring morale remains positive. Experts are also warning that departments need to stop working in silos and implement processes and tools that offer greater transparency over the entire business.

Experts are also predicting a greater prevalence in native advertising. With ad blocking on the rise, brands need to stay visible in a way that doesn’t interrupt the online user experience. Native advertising is a paid advertising placement that is blended seamlessly into a platform’s content so that it doesn’t interrupt the readers flow. The increasing importance of video is also being heralded. Reports indicate a video can achieve customer conversion rates of up to 60%. The video medium is enjoyable, easy to access and requires little effort for engagement. Live streaming is also providing customers a real time brand experience enabling brands to capitalize on a new revenue stream. Being “mobile friendly” is also important as growing trends indicate that brands have to wedge themselves firmly in the mobile space to stay relevant.

Competitive Strengths

Since our inception, we have worked diligently to establish and leverage key strengths in our business model, including:

A culture of innovation and creativity. We believe the only way to survive and thrive in our rapidly changing world is to change ahead of it. We are in a state of constant evolution and re-invention. We have created a culture committed to innovation and creativity that challenges convention and breaks new ground. Our team members are protective and proud of our culture by applying its “humble, yet hungry” attitude to all facets of our business. Our people and their innovations ultimately provide us with our largest competitive advantage. For example:

First-user generated content campaign for UPS;

First YouTube Influencer marketing campaign for The Home Depot and Citi;

First YouTube Influencer Campaign for ExxonMobil; and

First omni-channel shopping journey studies for Macy’s, Best Buy, and Staples.

7

Exploitation of Technologic Innovations and Social Marketing Importance

Our success lies, in part, to our understanding of new technologies especially in the social marketing space, augmented reality, image recognition, virtual reality and the ability to leverage these technologies in ways that we believe achieve and exceed our clients’ objectives.

Experienced management team and advisors

Our management team not only includes highly experienced entrepreneurs and executives from the digital media, technology and entertainment industries, but also outstanding strategic and creative advisors who are experts in social media and integrated marketing campaigns. See “Management” for details.

Our Growth Strategy

After more than 34 years of experience by management in delivering innovative involvement marketing campaigns, including more than eight years since our formation in January 2012, we believe our business model is market tested and poised for growth. While executing on our business strategy, we believe we have assembled a diverse and experienced team of senior managers, account executives and creative and analytical directors; developed and executed on involvement marketing campaigns which we believe have added value to our clients; and created our own brand-recognition in the marketing service agency industry. Key elements of our strategy to accelerate revenue growth and continue penetration of the marketplace include:

Organic Growth

We seek to work with one of the top three brands in almost every industry with focus on Restaurants, Packaged Goods, Retail, Pharma/OTC, Fuel, Automotive, Healthcare, Grocery/Convenience, and Entertainment. We will continue to use a mix of digital, social, public relations, and personal outreach to facilitate our organic growth.

Strategic Partnerships

We seek to develop strategic partnerships and alliances with companies that can facilitate expansion of our services to Fortune 500 companies having strong and well-recognized brands.

Executive Team Recruitment

We seek to attract talented executives possessing key skills and also relationships with brands which can be accretive to our client portfolio.

Accretive Acquisitions

We seek to acquire companies having the following criteria to supplement our portfolio of clients with the objective of driving our additional near and long-term revenue.

Complementary companies in other major geographical markets; and

Companies that work with at least one of the top three brands in industries where we do not currently have a significant representative client.

Our Customers

We have experience with what we believe to be some of the industry’s most innovative companies possessing what we believe to be well-known brands. Our industry experience includes in the fields of or in respect to:

Sports and Entertainment;

Oil and Gas;

Automotive;

Retail;

Restaurant;

B2B;

Financial Services;

Hotel and Hospitality;

Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG);

Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals;

Technology; and

AgriChem.

8

We believe the client relationships established in these diverse industries provide us with a competitive edge over the broader market in the adoption of new strategies and leading technologies. Our services are provided pursuant to respective service agreements with a host of companies, and clients within them, including:

Citigroup Inc.;

Bayer Animal Health;

Bayer CropScience Ltd;

Bayer Drop U.S.;

Bayer Drop Global;

Elanco

Our Sales and Marketing

We have a business development team that identifies potential clients having well-known brands as well as leveraging relationships with brands with whom our team is familiar. In addition to identifying potential clients, our business development team is responsible for nurturing and maintaining existing relationships to ensure customer satisfaction and to promote follow-up campaign opportunities.

Our business development team is composed of industry innovators in the communications business with deep connections and experience in digital, social media, technology, promotions, mobile, analytics and campaign development, implementation and management. Our business development team is led by award-winning executives who are frequent contributors to all-things digital on television, radio, conferences and webinars.

Our Revenue Model

We derive revenues from our clients based on a project-by-project basis through statement of work pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, which is typically customized to each of our clients. Dependent upon the statement of work which is directed by our clients, projects can vary from small scale platform, infrastructure and application development for influencer channels to large campaign initiatives that are project-based. Fees charged to clients are typically based on project/campaign fees which include retainer- and ongoing-fees negotiated with our clients.

Our Competition

Mastermind competes with agencies owned by large communications holding companies like WPP plc, Omnicom Group, Inc., Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and Publicis Groupe SA., for leading brands in almost every category.

Contracts and Material Relationships

In the normal course of business, we have entered and will continue to enter into development, licensing and royalty agreements. In addition, we have certain customers that represent a significant component of our revenue. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, there were four clients individually representing 10% or more of our total revenues. Total gross margin for these clients for the year ended September 30, 2020, was $1,959,287. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019, there were three clients individually representing 10% or more of our total gross margin. Total gross margin for these three clients for the year ended September 30, 2019 were $1,344,737.

Government Regulation

We are subject to a number of U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet. These laws and regulations may involve privacy, data security, advertising, rights of publicity, data protection, content regulation, intellectual property, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, taxation or other subjects. Many of these laws and regulations are still evolving and being tested in courts and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. As a result, the application, interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate and may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices.

9

We are also subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and the protection of user data. Foreign data protection, privacy, consumer protection, content regulation and other laws and regulations are often more restrictive than those in the United States. There are also potential federal legislative proposals and various state legislative bodies and foreign governments concerning data protection, tracking, behavioral advertising and consumer protection that could affect us.

In recent years, social media companies, to resolve investigations into various incidents, have entered into settlement agreements and consent decrees with the Federal Trade Commission that, among other things, require them to establish an information security program designed to protect non-public consumer information and also require that they obtain periodic independent security assessments. Violation of any regulatory orders, settlements, or consent decrees into which we may be required to enter could subject us to substantial monetary fines and other penalties that could negatively affect our financial statements for all periods presented.condition and results of operations.

Backlog

Our backlog in the ordinary course of business was approximately $82,000 at September 30, 2020.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016,September 30, 2020, we had no employees. Mr. Yankowitz has served as28 contract and full-time employees at our sole officerleased facility in Atlanta, Georgia. None of these employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and director since May 1, 2014, and devotes approximately 10% of his time on an annual basismanagement considers its relations with its employees to managing our matters.be good.



- 4 -





Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

None.

Item 2.

Properties

None.

We do not own any properties. We lease our corporate facility in Atlanta, Georgia pursuant to a commercial lease agreement (the “Lease”) with 1450 West Peachtree, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Landlord”). The manager of the Landlord is also our chief executive officer. We believe our current leased facility space is adequate for our near-term needs.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

In May 2016, Investment Services V Devkom International, LLC (“Devkom”), one

We are not a party to any other legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, which we believe will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of our former controlling shareholders, filed a complaint in the Eighth Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada against us, PacificWave Partners Limited (“PWP”), PWP’s principal, Henrik Rouf, Bennett Yankowitz, our President and sole director, and Mr. Yankowitz’s former law firm. The complaint contained several claims for relief arising out of an alleged breach of a contract between Devkom and PWP for the purchase of a controlling interest in our stock in May 2014. The breach alleged was the failure of PWP to pay approximately $76,000 to Devkom under the terms of the contract. Other claims included breach of an implied escrow agreement, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. Devkom sought to recover general, exemplary and punitive damages. In August 2016, the Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice.operations.

In June 2017, Devkom filed a similar complaint against the same defendants in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. In June 2017, we and PWP filed a motion to quash the service of the summons and complaint in the action on the grounds that the Court has no jurisdiction over the Company or PWP and that service was defective. At the same time, Mr. Yankowitz and his former law firm filed demurrers to all of the causes of action specified in the complaint.

A hearing on the motion to quash and the demurrers was held on January 5, 2018. The Court made a tentative ruling upholding our motion to quash, which if finalized, will have the effect of dismissing us as a defendant in the suit. A further hearing is scheduled for February 2, 2018.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.applicable.



10

- 5 -





PARTPart II

Item 5.

Market Information for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common has beenstock is quoted on the Over-The-Counter-Bulletin BoardOTC Market under the symbol “CCON”“MMND”. There is very limited trading inof our common stock. The stock market in general has experienced extreme stock price fluctuations in the past few years. In some cases, these fluctuations have been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Many companies have experienced dramatic volatility in the market prices of their common stock. The following table sets forthWe believe that a number of factors, both within and outside our control, could cause the high and low bid quotations forprice of our common stock for each ofto fluctuate, perhaps substantially. Factors such as the last two fiscal years, as reportedfollowing could have a significant adverse impact on the OTCQB. Quotations from the OTC reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.market price of our common stock:


 

Year Ended 2016

 

High

 

Low

4th Quarter

$

5.00

 

$

4.00

3rd Quarter

5.00

 

3.00

2nd Quarter

4.90

 

3.00

1st Quarter

5.00

 

4.00

Our financial position and results of operations;

Any litigation against us;

Possible regulatory requirements on our business;

The issuance of new debt or equity securities pursuant to a future offering;

Our ability to obtain additional financing and the terms thereof;

Changes in interest rates;

Competitive developments;

Variations and fluctuations in our operating results;

Change in financial estimates by securities analysts;

The depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;

Investor perceptions of us; and

General economic and business conditions.


 

Year Ended 2015

 

High

 

Low

4th Quarter

$

5.01

 

$

5.00

3rd Quarter

5.00

 

2.00

2nd Quarter

4.26

 

3.25

1st Quarter

4.01

 

3.50

As of December 31. 2017, we hadFebruary, 17, 2021, there were approximately 4,7284,700 stockholders of record. The last sale price as reported onquoted by the OTCQB tier of The OTC Markets as of November 30, 2017,on February 18, 2021, was $5.40. We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock and do not anticipate the payment of cash dividends in the foreseeable future.$0.40 per share.

11

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans as of the End of Fiscal 2018 Equity Compensation Plan Information

We do not have any stock option or other equity compensation plans.

Plan Category

Number of

securities to be

issued upon

exercise of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rights

Weighted average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rights

Number of

securities

remaining

available for future

issuance

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

-(1)$-4,000,000

(1)

This total represents shares available to be issued pursuant to the Mastermind, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On February 3, 2015, we sold 20,000

In connection with the Contribution Agreement, CoConnect issued 29,236,759 shares to three entities, each controlled by our three executives: MM Inc. which is owned by Daniel A. Dodson; Villanta, which is owned by Michael Gelfond; and Advize, which is owned by Ricardo Rios. These shares represented approximately eighty-five percent (85%) of the outstanding shares of common stockCoConnect after the offering pursuant to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales priceexemption under Section 4(a)(2) of $20,000,the Securities Act.

Dividend Policy

Our dividend policy is determined by our Board of Directors and depends upon a number of factors, including our financial condition and performance, its cash needs and expansion plans, income tax consequences, and the restrictions that applicable laws and any credit or $1.00 per share. On March 25, 2015, we sold an aggregate of 40,000 shares of our common stock for $40,000, or $1.00 per share. Of these 40,000 shares, 20,000 shares were purchased by Richway Finance Ltd., a Hong Kong company and an approximate 4.5% stockholder, and 20,000 shares were purchased by Allan Kronborg, an approximate 14.8% stockholder.

On November 23, 2015, we sold 946,666 shares of common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales price of approximately $946,000, or $1.00 per share. In addition, an additional 333,333 shares ofother contractual arrangements may then impose. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and 114,334 shares ofat the current time we do not anticipate paying a cash dividend on our common stock were reserved for future issuance to PacificWave Partners Limited and Henrik Rouf,in the owner of PacificWave Partners Limiterd and our Assistant Secretary, respectively, for an aggregate price of approximately $447,000foreseeable future. We did not declare or $1.00 per share.

The aforementioned transactions for the sale ofpay any cash dividends on our common stock were completed in reliance onduring the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Rules 504, 505, 506 and 903 thereunder. The shares will not be registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws, and unless so registered, may not be reoffered or resold in the United States absent such registration or an applicable exemption therefrom, or in a transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act and other applicable securities laws.past two fiscal years.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Small Business Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we did not purchase any of our equity securities nor did any of our affiliates purchase our equity securities for themselves or on our behalf.




- 6 -





Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Not applicableApplicable.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperation

Overview

We currently have no operations,

Our company was formed on January 1, 2012 by MM Inc. the Founding Member, through a contribution of assets. The organization, as governed by the Written Operating Agreement dated January 1, 2012, was formed for the purpose of engaging in the business of conceiving, developing, selling, marketing, implementing and/or otherwise providing services, systems, platforms and have been engagedproducts in effortsthe areas of mobile, social, digital and traditional marketing to identify an operating companyand for businesses and organizations, and conducting services and functions incidental to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction. As our planned principal operations have not yet commenced, our activities are subjectthe operation of such business. Effective January 1, 2017 and March 1, 2017, we granted a thirty percent (30%) and ten percent (10%) interest to significant risksVillanta and uncertainties, including the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.

SalesDigital Advize, respectively, in consideration of Unregistered Securities

On February 3, 2015, we sold 20,000 shares of common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales price of $20,000, or $1.00 per share. On March 25, 2015, we sold an aggregate of 40,000 shares of our common stock for $40,000, or $1.00 per share. Of these 40,000 shares, 20,000 shares were purchased by Richway Finance Ltd., a Hong Kong company and an approximate 4.5% stockholder, and 20,000 shares were purchased by Allan Kronborg, an approximate 14.8% stockholder.On November 23, 2015, we sold 946,666 shares of common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales price of approximately $946,000, or $1.00 per share. In addition, an additional 500,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for future issuance to one or more consultants in connection with future services to be renderedprovided to us.

We are an involvement marketing service agency, whose mission is to become one of the most well-respected marketing service agencies in connectionthe industry capable of involving people with identifying, negotiatingFortune 500 brands that designs, creates and conducting due diligencedevelops branding and marketing campaigns, primarily for large corporate clients with respectcategory-leading brands. We specialize in getting consumers and customers to potential operating companies for acquisition by ustake an action that leads to brand awareness, trial, loyalty, and raising additional capital for us.ultimately advocacy. Our conversion initiatives facilitate the involvement of more of the “right customers” with the brands of our clients. Our programs can take on various forms, including creating and managing digital content, designing campaign websites/landing pages, social media and viral campaigns, mobile marketing initiatives, brand communications and search engine optimization. We deliver innovative, result-producing campaigns to meet the business objectives of each client through any number, or combination thereof, or cutting-edge marketing initiatives.

Going Concern

Our financial statementsmost important assets in delivering the highest-quality involvement marketing services to our clients are our highly talented and experienced people made up of technologists, strategists, account service, paid media and creatives who work together and represent a cross-discipline of experts. We pride ourselves in a culture of mutually-shared support and teamwork. We ensure that our team is provided the best-in-class research, equipment, technology and training in all disciplines within our proven delivery process to deliver cutting-edge initiatives the get results. We are very competitive and have a winning culture that is present throughout the work we do for our clients and their brands.

12

Our organization has been presentedstructured in a manner to ensure a broad range of thinking, facilitate work flow, and deliver unparalleled marketing initiatives and service to our clients. This is proven by strong and long-lasting relationships with our clients and tenure of our key executives. We have a proven, five-step cyclical approach to every client engagement that ensures learning from every campaign execution is used to optimize future campaigns.

After more than 34 years of experience in delivering innovative involvement marketing campaigns, including more than five years since our formation in January 2012, we believe our business model is market tested and poised for growth. While executing on the basis thatour business strategy, we arebelieve we have assembled a going concern,diverse and experienced team of senior managers, account executives and creative and analytical directors; developed and executed on involvement marketing campaigns which contemplates the realization of assetswe believe have added value to our clients; and satisfaction of liabilitiescreated our own brand-recognition in the normal coursemarketing service agency industry. Key elements of business. At December 31, 2016, we did not have any business operations. our strategy to accelerate revenue growth and continue penetration of the marketplace include organic growth, strategic partnerships, recruitment of talented executives, and accretive acquisitions.

We have experienced recurring operating lossesrelationships with what we believe to be some of the industry’s most innovative companies, including Fortune 500 companies, in a diverse spectrum of industries possessing what we believe to be well-known brands. We believe the client relationships established within these diverse industries provide us with a competitive edge over the broader market in the adoption of new strategies and negative operating cash flows, and have financedleading technologies. We generate revenues from project/campaign-based fees charged to our recent working capital requirements primarily throughclients pursuant to client-specific service agreements.

Through the issuanceefforts of debt and equity securities,our business development team, we identify potential clients having well-known brands as well as borrowings from related parties. Asleveraging relationships with brands with whom our team is familiar. In addition to identifying potential clients, our senior management team is responsible for nurturing and maintaining existing relationships to ensure customer satisfaction and to promote follow-up campaign opportunities. Our business development team is composed of December 31, 2016, we had a working capital deficiency of approximately $45,000industry innovators in the communications business with deep connections and an accumulated deficit of approximately $13,903,000. As a result, management believes that thereexperience in digital, social media, technology, promotions, mobile, analytics and campaign development, implementation and management. Our business development team is substantial doubt about our abilityled by award-winning executives who are frequent contributors to continue as a going concern.all-things digital on television, radio, conferences and webinars.

Fiscal Year

Our abilityfiscal year ends on September 30. Reference in this annual report on Form 10-K to continue as a going concernfiscal year is dependent uponreference to the fiscal year ended September 30. For example, references to “fiscal 2020” or our ability“2020 fiscal year” refer to raise additional capital and to ultimately acquire or develop a commercially viable business. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.fiscal year ended September 30, 2020.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are describedsummarized in Note 32 to theour financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Our discussion and analysisstatements. However, certain of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon these financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In the past, actual results have not been materially different from our estimates. However, results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We have identified the following as critical accounting policies based onrequire the application of significant judgment by our management, and such judgments and estimates usedare reflected in determining the amounts reported in our financial statements:

·

Income Taxes.  Significantstatements. In applying these policies, our management uses its judgment is requiredto determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assetsthe determination of $4,866,000 as of December 31, 2016, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize these assets. The valuation allowance isestimates. Those estimates are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our observance of market trends, information provided by our strategic partners and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimatescontained in future periods we may need to adjust our valuation allowance which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.statements.

·

Equity Transactions.  We evaluate the proper classification of our equity instruments that embody an unconditional obligation requiring the issuer to redeem it by transferring assets at a determinable date or that contain certain conditional obligations, typically classified as equity, be classified as a liability. We record



- 7 -





financing costs associated with our capital raising efforts in our statements of operations. These include amortization of debt issue costs such as cash, warrants and other securities issued to finders and placement agents, and amortization of preferred stock discount created by in-the-money conversion features on convertible debt and allocates the proceeds amongst the securities based on relative fair values or based upon the residual method. We based our estimates and assumptions on the best information available at the time of valuation, however, changes in these estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on the valuation of the underlying instruments.

·

Stock-Based Compensation. We account for stock-based compensation using the fair value method of accounting. Compensation cost arising from stock options to employees and non-employee is recognized using the straight-line method over the vesting period, which represents the requisite service or performance period. The calculation of stock-based compensation requires us to estimate several factors, most notably the term, volatility and forfeitures.  We estimate the option term using historical terms and estimate volatility based on historical volatility of our common stock over the option’s expected term. Expected forfeitures based on historical forfeitures in calculating the expense related to stock-based compensation associated with stock awards. Our estimates and assumptions are based on the best information available at the time of valuation; however, changes in these estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on the valuation of the underlying instruments.

Results of Operations

For the

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016September 30, 2020 vs. December 31, 2015September 30, 2019

Revenues

We had no revenue generating operations

Revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, were $3,638,503 as compared with $3,954,089 for the comparable prior year period, a decrease of $315,586 or 8.0%. The decrease is primarily attributable the effect of the Covid 19 Pandemic delaying some client projects until the effect of the pandemic on the clients’ business could be ascertained by the respective clients.  

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 was $2,498,789 or 68.7% of revenues, compared with $1,806,281 or 45.7% of revenues, for the comparable prior year period. The increase in gross profit and margin was a result of lower labor costs and lower direct costs associated with the revenues for the current fiscal year compared to the previous fiscal year. This decrease is due to the types of marketing projects completed during the years ended December 31, 2016current year and 2015.lower associated direct costs for items such as paid media. Gross margin will fluctuate from year to year based on the types of work assigned to the Company by its clients.

13

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016September 30, 2020, were $10,000$2,450,392 as compared with $1,899,000$2,429,158 for the comparable prior year period, an increase of $21,234 or 0,9%. Our general and administrative expenses increased primarily as a decreaseresult of $1,889,000.increased general and administrative expenses, of $78,937 offset by lower personnel costs of $57,703 required.

Other Income or Expense, Net

Other expense, net for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, was $12,247 as compared with other income, net of $5,328 for the comparable prior year period. The decrease isincrease in expense related to exploratory merger and acquisition costs incurred for the year ended September 30, 2020 that were not incurred in the comparable prior year.

Income taxes

Income tax benefit for the year ended September 30, 2020, was primarily a result of compensation in connection withincome tax refunds due the issuanceCompany of our commons stock in connection with services provided by our Assistant Secretary and stock-based compensation in connection with a stock option granted$117,710 compared to our CEO during our fiscalincome tax expense of $136,396 for the year ended December 31, 2015.September 30, 2019.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2016,September 30, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0. This represents no change as$807,262, an increase of $65,089 when compared towith a cash and cash equivalents balance of $0$742,173 as of December 31, 2015.September 30, 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we had net cash outflows of $2,000 from operating activities as compared with net cash outflows of $68,000 for the prior year.

Our uses of cash for operating activities have primarily consisted of salaries and wages for our employees; costs incurred in connection with performance on client projects; facility and facility-related costs, material and professional feesfees. The sources of our cash flows from operating activities have consisted primarily of payments received from clients in connection with the performance on contractually agreed-upon projects. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, we had net cash of $222,061 used by operating activities as compared with net cash of $110,342 for the comparable prior year period. Net cash flows from operating activities for the current year was a result of net income of $141,173 and insurance costs.depreciation expense of $27,053, offset by changes in assets and liabilities of $390,947.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2019, we had net cash of $110,342 used by operating activities as a result of our net loss of $753,945, offset by changes in assets and liabilities of $614,413 and depreciation expense of $29,190.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, we used $14,600 in investing activities as compared with net cash of $15,445 used in investing activities for the comparable prior year period. The net cash outflows during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 are a result of the purchase of computers and office equipment.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, we had net cash of $301,750 provided by financing activities as compared to net cash of $6,589 for the comparable prior year period. The net cash inflows from financing activities in the current year were related to the funding of $2,000 as compared toa Paycheck Protection Program loan. The net cash inflows of $62,000provided by financing activities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is a resultSeptember 30, 2019 related to the repayment of the issuance of 60,000 shares of our common stock to three investors for gross proceeds of $60,000 and an advance of $2,000 from PacificWave Partners Limited, which is owned by our Assistant Secretary, in our prior year.to a related party.

Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates

There were no options or warrants exercised during the realization of assetsfiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and satisfaction of liabilities2019.

The ability to attract additional capital investments in the normal coursefuture will depend on many factors, including the availability of business. Forcredit, rate of revenue growth, ability to acquire new client opportunities, the year ended December 31, 2016, we incurred a net losstiming of approximately $10,000, had negativenew product introductions and enhancements to existing products, and the opportunities to acquire complimentary businesses that may be made available to us from time-to-time. We believe that as of September 30, 2020, our cash position and cash flows from our fiscal 2021 operations of approximately $2,000 and had awill be sufficient to fund our working capital deficit of approximately $45,000. We have financed our recent working capital requirements primarily throughand planned strategic activities for at least the issuancenext twelve months.

Any potential future sale of equity securities. As aor debt securities may result management believes there is substantial doubt aboutin dilution to our abilitystockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to continue as a going concern.us, or at all. If we are required to raise additional financing, but are unable to obtain such financing, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more aspects of our operations or business development activities.

Commitments

The recently declared pandemic related to the coronavirus could adversely impact our liquidity and capital resources, especially if our customers are negatively impacted by the decrease in economic activity caused by the virus. If our customers fail to reach budgeted revenue projections and reduce their expenditures proportionally, we could experience lower than expected growth in revenue or lower overall revenue. We do not have any long-term commitments at December 31, 2016could also experience delays or declines in revenue and 2015.new business and or implementations of marketing campaigns if customers or potential customers delay or cancel their plans due to the economic slowdown caused by the virus. Additionally, our operations could be impacted, and we could experience higher costs if, despite our mitigation and prevention efforts, the virus spread prevents affected employees from performing key duties.

14

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2016 and 2015,

As of September 30, 2020, we did not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Wearrangements that have, evaluated all issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements and determined that, other than the following, theyor are either immaterialreasonably likely to have, a current or not relevant to us.

In May 2014, the Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers(“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition



- 8 -





requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605, “Revenue Recognition”. The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this updated guidanceis that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new rule also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impactfuture material effect on our financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12,Compensation-Stock Compensation. The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 to provide specific guidance on share-based payment awards that provide for achievement of a specific performance target that could be achieved after the requisite service period. ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 may be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this guidance should be recognized in the financial statements as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date.Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any significant impact on our financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance to U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This new rule requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, ASU 2014-15: (1) defines the term substantial doubt, (2) requires an evaluation of every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plan, (4) requires certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) requires an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) requires an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016.Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any significant impact on our financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued “ASU 2016-01,Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. This ASU affects public and private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and employee benefit plans that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. The new guidance makes targeted improvements to existing GAAP by: (i) requiring equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (ii) requiring public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (iii) requiring separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; (iv) eliminating the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for organizations that are not public business entities; (v) eliminating the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; and (vi) requiring a reporting organization to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk (also referred to as “own credit”) when the organization has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. The ASU on recognition and measurement will take effect for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and employee benefit plans, the standard becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The ASU permits early adoption of the own credit provision (referenced above). Additionally, it permits early adoption of the provision that exempts private companies and not-for-profit organizations from having to disclose fair value information about financial instruments measured at amortized cost. It is not anticipated that this guidance will have a material impact on ourcondition, results of operations, cash flowsliquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.



- 9 -





financial condition.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments. The ASU affects all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including; the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU simplifies two areas specific to private companies, with regards to the expected term and intrinsic value measurements. This ASU simplifies the following areas to private and public companies; (a) tax benefits and tax deficiencies with regards to the differences between book and tax deductions, (b) changes in the excess tax benefits classification in the statement of cash flows, (c) make an entity wide accounting policy election for accrual of vested awards verses individual awards, (d) changes in the amount qualifying as an equity award classification subject to statutory tax withholdings, (e) clarification in the classification of shares withheld for statutory tax withholdings on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for any organization in any interim or annual period. It is not anticipated that this guidance will have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016–10,Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this ASU clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606 identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. Topic 606 includes implementation guidance on (a) contracts with customers to transfer goods and services in exchange for consideration and (b) determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments in this ASU are intended to render more detailed implementation guidance with the expectation to reduce the degree of judgement necessary to comply with Topic 606. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09). ASU 2015-14,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. It is not anticipated that this updated guidance will have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, an amendment to ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU addressed several areas related to contracts with customers. This topic is not yet effective and will become effective with Topic 606. We are currently evaluating the impact this topic will have on our financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, an amendment to Topic 350,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. An entity no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Because these amendments eliminate Step 3 2 from the goodwill impairment test, they should reduce the cost and complexity of evaluating goodwill for impairment. An entity should apply the amendments in this ASU on a prospective basis. The amendments in this ASU are effective for goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial statements.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable.





- 10 -







Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following documentsConsolidated Financial Statements and related report of independent registered public accounting firm are filed as part ofincluded in this report on Form 10-K. The information required by Item 8 isand are incorporated by reference herein fromin Part II, Item 15, “Exhibits8 hereof. See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1 hereof.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Prager Metis CPAs LLC

Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2020, and Financial Statement Schedules”2019

Consolidated Statements of this report.Operations for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

Page

Report of Paritz and Co., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015

F-2

Statements of Operations and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

F-3

Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

F-4

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-6

Item 9.

Changes In and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

By letter dated April 13, 2016, we were informed by our independent registered public accounting firm, PLS CPA (“PLS”), that PLS was resigning as our independent registered public accounting firm.  PLS did not provide any reason for its resignation. Our board of directors did not recommend or approve the resignation.

The reports of PLS on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting principles, but did contain a paragraph referring to the uncertainty with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern. PLS did not issue a report on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.None.

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, and in the subsequent period through April 13, 2016, there were no disagreements with PLS on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which if not resolved to the satisfaction of PLS, would have caused PLS to make reference to the matter in its reports on our financial statements for such periods. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, and in the subsequent period through April 13, 2016, there were no reportable events of the types described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

On April 25, 2017, based on the decision of our board of directors, we approved the engagement of Paritz and Company, P.A. (“Paritz”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

The certificationscertificates of our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer,principal financial and accounting officer attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K include, in paragraph 4 of such certifications, information concerning our disclosure controls and procedures, and internal control over financial reporting. Such certifications should be read in conjunction with the information contained in this Item 9A for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by such certifications.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016. The term “disclosure controls and procedures”, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that any system of controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met and that management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our

As required by the SEC rules and regulations for the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial



- 11 -





reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). A company’s reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. InternalGAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our assets;company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the interim or annualconsolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.errors or misstatements in our consolidated financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree ofor compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, conducted an evaluation of Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based onat September 30, 2020. In making these assessments, management used the framework inInternal Control Integrated Frameworkissuedcriteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (2013 Framework) (COSO).

Based on our assessments and those criteria and on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act were not effective as of September 30, 2020, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on this assessment,evaluation, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015,September 30, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to (i) insufficient segregation of our duties in the finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel,personnel; and (ii) inadequate corporate governance policies. In the future, subject to working capital limitations, we intend to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make improvements to remediate these deficiencies.

15

This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management'sManagement’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit us to provide only management'smanagement’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Item 9B.

Other Information

None.



None.

- 12 -

16





PARTPart III

Item 10.

Director,   Directors, Executive OfficerOfficers and Corporate Governance

The following table

Directors and textExecutive Officers

Mastermind is currently comprised of one director. Our director and named executive officer, their ages and positions, as well as certain biographical information of these individuals, are set forth below. The ages of the name of our director and executive officerindividuals are provided as of December 31, 2016. The Board of Directors is comprised of only one class. Our director will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. There are no family relationships between or among our director, executive officer or person nominated or charged by us to become a director or executive officer. Our executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and is appointed to serve until the first Board of Directors meeting following the annual meeting of stockholders. The brief description of the business experience of our director and executive officer and an indication of directorships held by him in other companies subject to the reporting requirements under the Federal securities laws are provided herein below.February 18, 2021.

Our sole director and executive officer is as follows:

Name

 

Age

 

Positions Held with the Registrant

Bennett J. YankowitzDaniel A. Dodson

 

61

 

Director, Chief Executive Officer

Michael Gelfond

48

Executive Vice President Treasurer, Secretary and sole Director

Ricardo Rios

44

Senior Vice President

Biographies of Directors and Executive Officers

Bennett J. Yankowitz

Daniel A. Dodson. Mr. Dodson has served as chief executive officer and sole director of the Company since January 1, 2012, the date of our inception and is sole director of Mastermind, Inc. since February 14, 2018. In 1984, Mr. Dodson was the founder, sole owner and president of National Promotion Services which was subsequently renamed Mastermind Marketing, Inc. and continues to be its president and sole owner. Mr. Dodson is considered an involvement marketing expert with demonstrated ability to leverage social, mobile, digital and promotion to facilitate the engagement of people with well-known brands to achieve increased client revenues and delivery of measurable returns on marketing investments. Mr. Dodson has been published in numerous trade publications and has been an invited speaker on the subject of involvement marketing at conferences and trade shows around the world. Mr. Dodson received his BBA in Accounting from Georgia State University in 1982.

Our Board has concluded that Mr. Dodson is an appropriate person to represent management on our Board of Directors given his position as our Chief Executive Officer, his tenure with us, which dates back to 1984, his professional credentials, and his standing in the advertising and media community, including expertise in involvement marketing, financial and operational matters as they relate to leveraging social, mobile, digital and promotion to facilitate the engagement of people with well-known brands.

Michael Gelfond. Mr. Gelfond was appointed as our Executive Vice President Treasurer, Secretaryin February 2018. From July 2010 through February 2017, Mr. Gelfond was Executive Vice President and sole director onPartner at Mastermind Marketing, Inc. Prior to July 2010, Mr. Gelfond was one of the founders and Vice President of Creative Digital Group, which was formed in February 2002 and sold to Digtias/LBi, a major independent global interactive agency, in May 1, 2014.2007. From July 1995 to 2002, Mr. YankowitzGelfond was Sr. Account Manager with iXL, a global digital agency with over 3000 offices. Mr. Gelfond is an award-winning leader in the digital marketing industry with a proven track record of results with his clients. Since 2005, Mr. Gelfond has more than 30 yearsbeen a member of experience asthe Board of Directors Ian’s Friends Foundation, a corporate attorneypediatric brain cancer lab funding charity, and since 2016, a member of the Board of Directors of Read with leading law firms, specializing in securities, financial and merger and acquisition transactions, and hasMalcolm, which was founded by Malcolm Mitchell, a background in financial analysis and real estate investment and development. He ismember of counsel to the law firm Shumaker Mallory LLP, and was previously of counsel to its predecessor firm Parker Shumaker Mills LLP. He was previously counsel to Kaye Scholer LLP and a partner of Heenan Blaikie and Stroock & Stroock & Strook LLP. He is also Managing Partner of Hancock Ventures, LLC, a California-based manager of Single Oak Ventures, LP, private investment fund. From 2002 to 2014, he was a director of Proteus Energy Corporation, a California-based private oil and gas production and development company, and was its Chief Executive Officer from 2008 to 2014. From 1997 to 2003, he was a principal of SY Development Corporation, a Los Angeles-based real estate development company.New England Patriots football organization. Mr. Yankowitz earnedGelfond received his B.A. degree in Mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley (1977), his J.D.BA degree from the University of Southern California (1980), where heGeorgia in May 1995. Mr. Gelfond is an award-winning, conference speaker/contributor on radio and TV on all matters of digital marketing. A 2010 winner of Atlanta 40 Under 40 award, Mr. Gelfond has proven track record of results with his clients.

Ricardo Rios. Mr. Rios was an editorappointed as Senior Vice President of theSouthern California Law Review, Company in May 2016 and of CoConnect in February, 2018. From November 2010 through July 2015, Mr. Rios was Vice President of Digital Marketing for Citi Retail Services, a division of Citigroup. Prior to November 2010, Mr. Rios held various positions in the digital marketing and marketing agency industry. Mr. Rios received his LL.M.Bachelor’s degree (First Class Honours)in Business Administration with a major in Finance from the University of Cambridge (1981), where he was an Evan Lewis-Thomas Scholar at Sidney Sussex College. He is a memberArizona in December 1998.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of the California and New York bars. It is anticipated that once we have consummated the acquisition of an operating company, Mr. Yankowitz may resign some or all of his offices and his directorshipDirectors

Pursuant to procedures set forth in favor of members of the operating company’s management.

Audit Committee

We do not presently have an audit committee, nor do we have a financial expert serving onour bylaws, our Board of Directors.Directors will consider stockholder nominations for directors if we receive timely written notice, in proper form, of the intent to make a nomination at a meeting of stockholders. To be timely, the notice must be received within the time frame identified in our bylaws. To be in proper form, the notice must, among other matters, include each nominee’s written consent to serve as a director if elected, a description of all arrangements or understandings between the nominating stockholder and each nominee and information about the nominating stockholder and each nominee. These requirements are detailed in our bylaws, which were included in our previous filings with the SEC on Forms 10-K and 8-K. A copy of our bylaws will be provided upon written request to the Chief Executive Officer at Mastermind, Inc., 1450 W. Peachtree St. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30309.

Code of Ethics

We currently have not adopted a written code of ethics. We intend to implement a comprehensive corporate governance program, including adopting a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct authorizing the establishment of a committee to ensure that our disclosure controls and procedures remain effective. Our Code also defines the standard of conduct expected by our officers, directors and key employees. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct will be furnished without charge to any person upon written request. Requests should be sent to: Secretary, CoConnect, Inc., 3651 Lindell Road, Suite D565, Las Vegas, Nevada 89103.corporate governance program as working capital allows.

17

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance with

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Amended

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file various reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely on a review of copies of such forms submitted to us, we believe that all persons subject to the requirements of Section 16(a) filed such reports on a timely basis in fiscal 2020.

Corporate Governance and Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has long believed that good corporate governance is important to ensure that we manage our company for the long-term benefit of stockholders. During the past year, our Board of Directors has continued to review our governance practices in light of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and recently revised SEC concerning their holdings of,rules and transactions in, our securities. Copies of these filings must be furnishedregulations. The Company intends to us.implement internal corporate governance guidelines and practices, and will make such guidelines and practices available on its website at www.mastermindmarketing.com, when implemented as working capital allows.











- 13 -





Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

This section discusses the material components of the fiscal 2020 and 2019 executive compensation program for our named executive officers. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs.

The following table below summarizesprovides information regarding the total compensation paid for services in all capacitiesawarded to, our Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

 

Annual Compensation

 

Long-Term Compensation

Name and Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Bonus

 

Other Annual Compensation

 

Restricted Stock Awards ($)

 

Shares Underlying Options Granted ($)

 

All Other Compensation

Bennett J. Yankowitz (1)

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

 

2016

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

 

2015

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

433,000

 

$

-


(1)

On May 1, 2014, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Bennett J. Yankowitz as our President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director.

Option Grants in 2016 and 2015 - Named Executive Officer

There were no grants or stock options or issuances of warrants toearned by, our named executive officers infor fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019.

Named Executive Officer

 

Fiscal Year

 

Salary ($)

  

Bonus ($)

  

Stock

Awards ($)

  

Option

Awards ($)

  

All Other

Compensation

($) (1)

  

Total ($)

 

Daniel J. Dodson

 

2020

 $49,333  $-  $-  $-  $389,759  $439,092 

Chief Executive Officer

 

2019

  36,000   -   -   -   459,397   495,397 
                           

Michael Gelfond

 

2020

 $95,833  $-  $-  $-  $174,990  $270,823 

Executive Vice President

 

2019

  90,000   -   -   -   210,835   300,835 
                           

Ricardo Rios

 

2020

 $55,849  $-  $-  $-  $162,394  $218,243 

Senior Vice President

 

2019

  23,660   -   -   -   210,126   224,786 

(1)          All other compensation includes (i) consulting fees paid, pursuant to the year ended December 31, 2016

On November 20, 2015, our board of directors approved the grant to Mr. Yankowitz of a non-qualified stock option exercisable into 473,334 sharesterms of our common stock. The stock option was issued as compensation for services providedoperating agreement, to usMM Inc. which is owned by Daniel J. Dodson; Villanta, which is owned by Michael Gelfond; and to be provided through December 31, 2015. The stock option was immediately vestedAdvize, which is owned by Ricardo Rios; and (ii) health benefits paid on the date of grant and exercisable at $0.15 per share. In determining the fair valuebehalf of the stock option, we utilizednamed executive officers by us. All other compensation consists of the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions: i) stock option exercise price of $0.15; ii) grant date price of our common stock of $1.00; iii) expected term of option of 5 years; iv) expected volatility of our common stock of 100%; v) expected dividend rate of 0.0%;following:

a.

Daniel A. Dodson: Consulting fees of $373,333 and $444,000, and employee benefits of $16,425 and $15,397 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

b.

Michael Gelfond: Consulting fees of $174,167 and $210,000, and employee benefits of $823 and $835 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

c.

Ricardo Rios: Consulting fees of $157,972 and $197,240, and employee benefits of $4,422 and $3,886 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Employment Agreements and vi) risk-free interest rate of 0.0%. Accordingly, we recorded stock-based compensationOther Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

None. The Company is considering entering into agreements with key executives in general and administrative expenses of approximately $433,000 during thefiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2021.

Option Exercises in 2016 and 2015

Outstanding Equity Award During Fiscal 2020

None.

Employment Agreements; Compensation

We have not entered into any employment or compensation agreements or arrangements with our officers or directors.Option Exercises and Stock Vested During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 we did not have any full-time employees.Fiscal 2020

During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid compensation to Mr. Yankowitz in the amount of $0 and $0, respectively except as to stock options noted above.

Mr. Yankowitz is reimbursed for certain out-of-pocket expenses.None.

Any future compensation arrangements will be subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.




- 14 -


18



Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth asthe beneficial ownership of December 31, 2017, certain information regarding beneficial ownershipshares of our common stock, byas of February 18,. 2021, of (i) each person known by us to beneficially own five percent (5%) or entity who we know to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock,such shares; (ii) each of our directors and (iii) all directors andcurrent executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iii) our current executive officer and directors as a group. AsExcept as otherwise indicated, all shares are beneficially owned, and the persons named as owners hold investment and voting power.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of December 31, 2017, there were 4,633,761the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, shares of our commonCommon Stock which may be acquired upon exercise of stock issued and outstanding, andoptions or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days of the date of the applicable table below are deemed beneficially owned by the holders of such options and warrants and are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of any other person. Subject to purchase 525,667community property laws, where applicable, the persons or entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock, for a total of 5,159,428 shares of common stock beneficially owned. In computing the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by a person, shares of common stock that a person has a right to acquire within sixty (60) days of December 31, 2017 pursuant to options, warrants, convertible debt or preferred stock or other rights are counted as outstanding. This table is based upon information supplied by our directors, officers and principal stockholders and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

 

Percent of Class

Bennett J. Yankowitz (3), (4)

468 North Camden Drive, Suite 350

Beverly Hills, California 90210

 

986,667

 

19.1%

All officers and directors as a group (one person)

 

986,667

 

19.1%

 

 

 

 

 

SJ Corporate Finance ApS

Hvedevej 4

Smoerum 2765 Denmark

 

446,714

 

8.7%

Allan Kronborg (1)

Nellerodvej 65

3200 Helsinge Denmark

 

466,714

 

9.0%

Carsten Jensen

Tingskiftevej 5

2900 Hellerup, Denmark

 

358,722

 

7.0%

Henrik Rouf (5)
8, Boulevard Royal
L-2449 Luxembourg

 

1,249,681

 

24.2%

Henrik Oerbekker (2)

94 rue des Aubepines

L-1145 Luxembourg

 

944,430

 

18.3%

Advantage Luxembourg (6)

8, Boulevard Royal

L-2449 Luxembourg

 

558,000

 

10.8%

Devkom International, LLC Series V

c/o Brian Alexander, Esq.

5151 Shoreham Place, Suite 200

San Diego, California 92122

 

275,000

 

5.3%


(1) Includes 461,000 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Kronborg and 85,714 shares of common stock held in Mr. Kronborg’s pension account at BIL Bank, as to which Mr. Kronborg is the beneficial owner.

(2) Includes 156,097 shares of common stock held in the name of PW Europe, of which Mr. Oerbekker is a Director, 658,000 shares of common stock held in the name of Advantage Luxemburg S.A., of which Mr. Oerbekker is Director, and 61,000 shares acquired by Mr. Oerbekker and gifted to his children Frederikke Oerbekker (15,250 shares), Sascha Oerbekker (15,250 shares), Sandra Oerbekker (15,250 shares) and Sophie Oerbekker (15,250 shares), over all of which Mr. Oerbekker disclaims voting and dispositive power.

(3) Mr. Yankowitz purchased 461,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $42,000 (approximately $0.09 per share) from PacificWave on May 1, 2014 (see “ITEM 1. BUSINESS – Change-in-Control Transaction”). The purchase price was evidenced by a promissory note due May 1, 2019 with interest at 3% per annum and secured by the purchased shares. The Company was not a party to this transaction.  

(4) On November 20, 2015, we authorized the issuance of a stock option to purchase 473,334 shares of its



- 15 -





common stock to Mr. Yankowitz, its President and sole director. The stock option was issued as compensation for services provided to the Company and to be provided through December 31, 2015. The stock option has an exercise price of $0.15 per share, is immediately vested and will expire on November 20, 2020. On September 27, 2017, we authorized the issuance of a stock option to purchase 52,333 shares of our common stock to Mr. Yankowitz, our President and sole director. The stock option was issued as compensation for services provided and to be provided from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. The stock option, which is immediately vested, has an exercise price of $0.15 per share and expires September 27, 2022.

(5) Includes 460,000 shares held by PacificWave Partners Limited, of which Mr. Rouf is Managing Director and sole beneficial owner, and 558,000 shares of common stock held in the name of Advantage Luxemburg S.A., of which Mr. Rouf is a Director.

(6) Messrs. Rouf and Oerbekker are Directors of Advantage Luxembourg S.A. These shares are also includedCommon Stock indicated as beneficially owned by Messrs. Roufthem.

The business address of each person listed below is c/o Mastermind Marketing, Inc., 1450 W. Peachtree Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30309.

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and

Nature of

Beneficial

Ownership

  

Percent of

Class. (1)

 

Mastermind Marketing, Inc. (2)

  17,542,055   50.8

%

Digital Advize, LLC (3)

  2,923,676   8.5

%

Villanta Corporation (4)

  8,771,028   25.4

%

         

Total

  29,236,759   84.7

%

(1) Based on 34,505,520 shares of common stock issued and outstanding

(2) The principle of Mastermind Marketing Inc. is Daniel A. Dodson

(3) The principle of Digital Advize is Ricardo Rios

(4) The principle of Villanta Corporation is Michael Gelfond

Change of Control

As a result of the issuance of the shares pursuant to the Business Combination and Oerbekker.

Informationrelated transactions, a change in control of the Company occurred as of February 14, 2018. Except as described in this Report, no arrangements or understandings exist among present or former controlling shareholders with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is providedthe election of members of our Board and, to our knowledge, no other arrangements exist that might result in “ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.”a change of control of the Company.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Related Party Transactions

This section describesOn January 3, 2012, we entered into a perpetual license agreement (the “Perpetual License”) with Mastermind Marketing, Inc. (the “Licensor”), which provides for licenses of trademarks, internet domains, and certain intellectual property as defined in the material transactions that we have engaged in with persons who were directors, officers or affiliates before and at the time of the transaction, and persons known by us to be the beneficial owners of 5% or morePerpetual License. The Licensor is one of our common stock duringmajority shareholders and its chief executive officer is Daniel A. Dodson, our chief executive officer. The Perpetual License, which may be terminated at any time by either party, is effective January 3, 2012 and provides for aggregate payments of $2,100,000 over the calendar years from 2019 through 2039 with no further payments required after December 31, 2039. The Company has recorded expenses of $60,000 and $45,000 for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Included in prepaid expenses as of September 30, 2020, is $15,000 that will be expensed during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.2020.

Effective

On January 1, 2015,3, 2014, we entered into an office sublease arrangementa commercial lease agreement (the “Lease”) with Bamboo Holdings,1450 West Peachtree, LLC, (“Bamboo”a Georgia limited liability company (the “Landlord”). Bamboo, for the lease of our corporate facility in Atlanta, Georgia. The manager of the Landlord is ownedalso our chief executive officer. The term of the Lease is 10 years from the date of the agreement and provides for monthly rent and payment of operating expenses on a triple-net basis. The monthly rent terms of the Lease have been altered by Mr. Yankowitz. The sublease arrangement, which was terminated during 2015, required Bamboothe landlord due to pay us approximately $1,000 per month,another tenant occupying space the approximate fair market value for such space. Approximately $7,000 of sublease income was offset against our total rent expense of approximately $21,000 duringCompany verbally agreed to allow the landlord to remove from the space available to the Company. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015September 30, 2020, and is included2019, we made lease payments of $120,000 and $120,000, respectively, in general and administrative expenses.

On February 3, 2015, we sold 20,000 shares of common stock to PacificWave for an aggregate sales price of $20,000, or $1.00 per share. On March 25, 2015, we sold an aggregate of 40,000 sharessatisfaction of our common stock for $40,000, or $1.00 per share. Of these 40,000 shares, 20,000 shares were purchased by Richway Finance Ltd., a Hong Kong companyobligation pursuant to the Lease.

19

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and an approximate 4.5% stockholder, and 20,000 shares were purchased by Allan Kronborg, an approximate 14.8% stockholder.

On November 23, 2015,2019, we issued 946,666 sharesmade payments to our three executives pursuant to the terms of our common stock in lieu of cashoperating agreement, as amended, for services rendered to PacificWave Partners Limitedus. The total amount expensed to our three members during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019 aggregated $705,471 and $851,240, respectively. As of September 30, 2020, and 2019, we owed $100,000 and $-0- payable to our three members for an aggregate sales priceconsulting services

Independence of approximately $947,000.the Board of Directors

On March 16, 2015, PacificWave loaned us $5,000

We are not currently subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the Board be “independent” and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our Board comprised of a majority of “Independent Directors.”

Board Attendance

Our Board is comprised of one director who is also our chief executive officer. We did not convene any formal meetings of the Board of directors during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020.

Committees of the Board of Directors

We currently have no separate audit, compensation, or nominating committees. The entire Board oversees our (i) audits and auditing procedures; (ii) compensation philosophies and objectives, establishment of remuneration levels for working capital purposes pursuant to a short-term unsecured promissory note due March 31, 2015 with interest at 5%. The promissory note was repaid on March 23, 2015.

In addition, an additional 333,333 sharesour executive officers, and implementation of our common stockincentive programs; and 114,334 shares(iii) identification of individuals qualified to become Board members and recommendation to our common stock were reserved for future issuance to PacificWave Partners Limited and Henrik Rouf, the ownershareholders of PacificWave Partners Limiterd and our Assistant Secretary, respectively, for an aggregate price of approximately $447,000 or $1.00 per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, PacificWave Partners Limited provided us an advance of approximately $2,000 to pay certain regulatory fees and is included in our balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.

Mr. Henrik Rouf also serves as our Assistant Secretary. On July 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement with PacificWave to provide consulting and investment banking services to us, in particular with respect to raising capital for us and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. PacificWave and Mr. Rouf beneficially owned an aggregate of 1,005,833 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2015, constituting 24.0% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Mr. Rouf has the sole power to vote, direct the vote, dispose and direct the disposition of 465,833 of these shares and shared power to vote, direct the vote, dispose and direct the disposition of the remaining 540,000 shares.

Director Independence

We do not consider Mr. Yankowitzpersons to be an “independent director,”nominated for election as such term is defined by the NASDAQ Rules or Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.directors.



Director’s Compensation




None.

- 16 -





Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

PLS CPA, A Professional Corp. (“PLS”) acted as

The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by Prager Metis CPAs LLC, our independent registered public accounting firm, for the year ended December 31, 2014 andprofessional services rendered for the interim periods in such years. Paritz & Co. (“Paritz”) acted as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the interim periods in such years. The following table shows the fees that we incurred for audit and other services provided by Paritz and PLS for thefiscal years ended December 31, 2016September 30, 2020 and 2015, respectively.2019.

 

2016

 

2015

Audit Fees - Paritz

$

9,000

 

$

9,000

Audit-Related Fees

-

 

-

Tax Fees

-

 

-

All Other Fees

-

 

-

Total

$

9,000

 

$

9,000

  

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

 

Fee Category

 

2020

  

2019

 

Prager Metis CPAs LLC Audit fees

 $38,000  $35,500 

Other audit related fees

  -   - 

Tax fees

  -   - 

Total fees

 $38,000  $35,500 

Audit Fees.Fees Audit

This category consists of fees represent feesbilled for professional services provided in connection withrendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our financial statements included in our Form 10-Q quarterly reports and other professional services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings.

Audit-related Fees.Other Audit Related Fees Audit-related

This category consists of fees represent fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and not reported above under “Audit Fees.”

Tax Fees. Tax fees represent feesbilled for professional services related torendered for services other than those described herein as Audit Fees or Tax Fees.

20

Tax Fees

This category consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance and acquisitions.

All Other Fees. All other fees represent fees related to other than audit, audit-related,Pre-Approval Policies and tax fees.Procedures

All audit related services, tax services and other services rendered by Paritz and PLS were pre-approved by our Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors has adopted a pre-approval policythe authority to approve all audit and non-audit services that provides for the pre-approval of all servicesare to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm. Generally, we may not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by the Board of Directors.



21

- 17 -





PARTPart IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

The following are filed as part of this Form 10-K:

(1)

Financial Statements: For a list of financial statements which are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, see Page 11.

(2)

Exhibits


Exhibit No.

Description

3.131.1*

Articles of Incorporation, as filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange on June 29, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2

Bylaws, as filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.

23.1

Consent of PLS CPA, A Professional Corp., Independent Public Accounting Firm

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuantpursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002

31.231.2*

Certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuantpursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002

32.132.1*

Certification of the ChiefPrincipal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuantpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuantpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. **2002

101.INS

 

101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document.Document

101.SCH101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL101.CAL**

XBRL TaxomonyTaxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB101.DEF**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions

101.LAB**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE101.PRE**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

**       XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Item 16.   Form 10–K Summary

None.

22

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Mastermind, Inc.

101.DEFDate: February 22, 2021

By:

/s/ Daniel A. Dodson

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.Daniel A. Dodson

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature

Capacity

Date

*/s/ Daniel A. Dodson

     Daniel A. Dodson

Chairman of the Board, President,

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Filed herewith.February 22, 2021

23

MASTERMIND, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are submitted herewith in response to Item 8:

Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Prager Metis CPAs LLC

F-2

**Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2020, and 2019

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii)F-4

Consolidated Statements of Regulation S-K,Stockholders’ Equity for the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1years ended September 30, 2020, and 32.2 hereto are deemed2019

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019

F-6

Notes to accompany this Form 10-K and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.  Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7



F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



- 18 -







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


TheTo the Board of Directors and Stockholders of CoConnect,Mastermind, Inc.:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CoConnect,Mastermind, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016September 30, 2020 and 20152019 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiencyequity, and cash flowsflow for the years then ended. These financial statements areended (collectively referred to as the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)“financial statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of CoConnect, Inc.the Company as of December 31, 2016September 30, 2020 and 20152019 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements have been prepared assuming thatare the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company will continue as a going concern.  The abilityin accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the CompanySecurities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, its successful execution of its plan of operations and ability to raise additional financing. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise additional capital or sell any of its products or services at a profit.  As discussed in Note 2 toobtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements at December 31, 2016,are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we did not have any business operations. We have experienced recurring operating lossesengaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and negative operating cash flows,performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and have financed our recent working capital requirements primarily throughdisclosures in the issuance of debtfinancial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and equity securities,significant estimates made by management, as well as borrowings from related parties. Asevaluating the overall presentation of December 31, 2016,the financial statements. We believe that our working capital deficiency was approximately $45,000 andaudits provide a reasonable basis for our accumulated deficit was approximately $13,903,000. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.opinion.


/s/ Paritz & Company, P.A.Prager Metis CPA’s LLC

We have served as the Company’s auditors since 2018

Hackensack, New Jersey

January 23, 2018February 18, 2021



F-2

Mastermind, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  

As of September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 
         

ASSETS

        
Current assets:        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $807,262  $742,173 

Accounts receivable

  747,472   414,650 

Unbilled receivables

  40,019   51,976 

Income tax receivable

  117,710   - 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  173,424   186,087 

Total current assets

  1,885,887   1,394,886 

Property and equipment, net

  65,828   78,940 

Right-of-use asset, net

  364,714   - 

Total assets

 $2,316,429  $1,473,826 
         
LIABILITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 $123,216  $130,395 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, related

  100,000   - 

Unearned revenues

  82,450   169,820 

Deferred tax liabilities

  169,452   139,937 

Lease obligation, current

  102,499   - 

Total current liabilities

  577,617   440,152 

Lease obligation, net of current portion

  262,215   - 

Note payable - PPP Loan

  301,750   - 

Total liabilities

  1,141,582   440,152 
         
Stockholders' Equity:        

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020, and September 31, 2019

  -   - 

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized, 33,870,520 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020, and September 30, 2019

  33,871   33,871 

Retained earnings

  1,140,976   999,803 

Total stockholders’ equity

  1,174,847   1,033,674 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 $2,316,429  $1,473,826 







COCONNECT, INC.

Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

December 31,

 

2016

 

2015

ASSETS

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

  Cash

$

 

$

  Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

    Total current assets

 

 

 

 

 

Security deposit

 

        Total assets

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

  Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$

41 

 

$

33 

  Related party advances

 

    Total current liabilities and total liabilities

45 

 

35 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' deficit:

 

 

 

  Series B preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

 

  Common stock; $0.001 par value; 4,999,000,000 shares authorized; 4,186,094 shares issued; and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

 

  Common stock to be issued

 

  Additional paid-in capital

13,859 

 

13,859 

  Accumulated deficit

(13,903)

 

(13,893)

Total stockholders' deficit

(40)

 

(30)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit

$

 

$














The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements


F-3

Mastermind, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  

Years Ended September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 
         

Revenues

 $3,638,503  $3,954,089 

Cost of revenues

  1,139,713   2,147,808 

Gross Profit

  2,498,790   1,806,281 
         

Operating Expenses:

        

General and administrative

  2,450,392   2,429,158 

Total operating expenses

  2,450,392   2,429,158 

Income (loss) from operations

  48,938   (622,877

)

         

Other Income (Expense), Net:

        

Other expense

  (13,100

)

  - 

Loss on disposal

  (660

)

  - 

Interest income

  1,513   2,668 

Other income, net

  -   2,660 

Total other income (expense), net

  (12,247

)

  5,328 

Net income (loss) before provision for income taxes

  36,151   (617,549

)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  (105,022

)

  136,396 

Net income (loss)

 $141,173  $(753,945

)

         

Net income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic

 $(0.00

)

 $(0,02

)

Diluted

 $(0.00

)

 $(0.02

)

         

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

        

Basic

  33,870,520   33,870,520 

Diluted

  33,870,520   33,870,520 






COCONNECT, INC.

Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2016

 

2015

Revenues

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

  General and administrative

10 

 

1,899 

      Total expenses

10 

 

1,899 

Provision for income taxes

 

Net loss

$

(10)

 

$

(1,899)

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted

$

(0.00)

 

$

(0.57)

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

4,186,094 

 

3,327,157 

















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements


F-4

Mastermind, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

  

Common Stock

             
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Additional Paid-in Capital

  

Retained Earnings

  

Total Equity

 

Balance at September 30, 2018

  33,870,520  $33,871  $-  $1,753,748  $1,787,619 

Net loss

  -   -   -   (753,945

)

  (753,945

)

Balance at September 30, 2019

  33,870,520   33,871   -   999,803   1,033,674 

Net income

              141,173   141,173 

Balance at September 30, 2020

  33,870,520  $33,871  $-  $1,140,976  $1,174,847 







CoConnect, Inc.

Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit

For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

(In thousands except share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock

 

Common Stock

 

Common Stock to be Issued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Additional Paid-in Capital

 

Accumulated Deficit

 

Total Stockholders’ Deficit

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

-

 

$

-

 

3,179,428

 

$

3

 

-

 

$

-

 

$

11,973

 

$

(11,994)

 

$

(18)

Common stock issued in private placement

 

 

 

 

 

60,000

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

60 

Common stock issued for services

 

 

 

 

 

946,666

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

946

 

 

 

947 

Common stock to be issued for services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

447,667

 

-

 

447

 

 

 

447 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

433

 

 

 

433 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,899)

 

(1,899)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

-

 

-

 

4,186,094

 

4

 

447,667

 

-

 

13,859

 

(13,893)

 

(30)

Common stock issued in private placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock to be issued for services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10)

 

(10)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

-

 

$

-

 

4,186,094

 

$

4

 

447,667

 

$

-

 

$

13,859

 

$

(13,903)

 

$

(40)




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements





F-5


Mastermind, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  

Years Ended September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net income (loss)

 $141,173  $(753,945

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:

        

Depreciation

  27,053   29,190 

Loss on disposal of equipment

  660   - 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  (332,822

)

  401,566 

Unbilled receivables

  11,957   278,120 

Income tax receivable

  (117,710

)

  - 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  12,663   (162,476

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  (7,180

)

  6,533 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, related

  100,000   - 

Unearned revenues

  (87,370

)

  60,457 

Deferred tax liabilities

  29,515   30,213 

Net cash flows used in operating activities

  (222,061

)

  (110,342

)

         

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Purchases of property and equipment

  (14,600

)

  (15,445

)

Net cash flows used in investing activities

  (14,600

)

  (15,445

)

         

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Proceeds of PPP note payable

  301,750   - 

Collection of related party advance

  -   6,589 

Net cash flows provided by financing activities

  301,750   6,589 
         

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

  65.089   (119,198

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  742,173   861,371 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $807,262  $742,173 
         

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

        

Income taxes paid

 $-  $- 

Interest paid

 $-  $- 
         

Schedule of non-cash Investing or Financing Activity:

        

Operating lease right-of-use asset and liability

 $461,740  $- 


COCONNECT, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2016

 

2015

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

  Net loss

$

(10)

 

$

(1,899)

  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

    Stock-based compensation

 

433 

    Common stock issued for services

 

947 

    Common stock to be issued for services

 

447 

    Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

      Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

19 

      Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

(15)

        Net cash flows used in operating activities

(2)

 

(68)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

  Proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

60 

  Proceeds from related party advance

 

        Net cash flows provided by financing activities

 

62 

        Net change in cash

 

(6)

        Cash at beginning of year

 

        Cash at end of year

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

  Interest paid

$

 

$

  Income taxes paid

$

 

$




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




F-5



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


1.

Business Operations

Businessstatements

CoConnect,

F-6

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

1.

Business

Mastermind, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or the “organization”) is an involvement marketing service agency that designs, creates and develops branding and marketing campaigns, primarily for large corporate clients with well-known brands. We specialize in customer conversion initiatives that we believe facilitate the involvement of more of the “right customers” with the brands of our clients. We focus on converting prospects to customers. Our programs can take on various forms, including creating and managing content marketing, influencer marketing, social marketing/community management, digital issues management promotions, Augmented Reality Marketing, and UX Analytics & Digital Intelligence.

On February 14, 2018, we consummated a transactions pursuant to a Joint Venture Interest Contribution Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) made and entered into as of February 14, 2018 by and among (i) us, (ii) Mastermind Involvement Marketing, a Georgia joint venture (“MIM”), and (iii) Mastermind Marketing, Inc, a Georgia Corporation (“MM Inc.”), Digital Advize, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Advize”), and Villanta Corporation, a Georgia Corporation (“Villanta”, together with Advize and MM Inc., a Nevada corporation,the “Sellers” or “Majority Stockholders”).

Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement the Sellers contributed, transferred, assigned and conveyed to us all right, title and interest in and to one hundred percent (100%) of such joint venture interest in MIM (the “Company”“Contributed Joint Venture Interest”), currently hastogether with any and all rights, privileges, benefits, obligations and liabilities appertaining thereto, reserving unto such Seller no operations,rights or interests therein whatsoever, and has been engaged(ii) we accepted the contribution of the Contributed Joint Venture Interest, and in effortsconsideration for such contribution the Sellers collectively were entitled to identify an operating company to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction. Asreceive from us 29,236,759 of our planned principal operations have not yet commenced,common stock, $.001 par value (the “Common Stock”) representing 85% of our activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, includingtotal outstanding Common Stock after the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.

Any business combination or transaction will likely result in a significant issuance of shares and substantial dilution to our present stockholders. We expectthe Contribution Consideration (the “Contribution Consideration”) with each Seller receiving for its respective percentage of Contributed Joint Venture Interest that same percentage of the closing of such aContribution Consideration (such transaction, would result in a change in control and be accounted for as a reverse merger, whereby the operating company would be considered as the legal acquiree and accounting acquirer, and we would be considered the legal acquirer and the accounting acquiree.“Business Combination”). As a result atof the Business Combination, the Sellers became our controlling shareholders of and subsequent to closing of any such transaction,we became a wholly-owned subsidiary. The Business Combination was treated as a “reverse acquisition” for accounting purposes, whereby MIM is considered the acquirer for accounting purposes, and our historical financial statements before the Business Combination have been replaced with the historical financial statements of MIM and its consolidated entities before the operating company would becomeBusiness Combination in all future filings.

On April 19, 2018, our financial statements for all periods presented. AsBoard of December 31, 2016, there was no transaction.Directors took action by written consent to approve an amendment to our certificate of incorporation (the “Amended Certificate”) to change of our name from CoConnect, Inc. to Mastermind, Inc. (the “Name Change”), subject to stockholder approval. On April 27, 2018, in lieu of a meeting of our stockholders, and pursuant to Section 78.320 of the Nevada Revised Statutes of the State of Nevada, the Majority Stockholders, who represent 85% of our voting securities, approved the Amended Certificate, by written consent. On May 24, 2018, we filed the Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to change our name to Mastermind, Inc.

2.

Going ConcernFiscal Year

Our financial statements have been presentedfiscal year ends on September 30. References herein to fiscal 2020 and/or fiscal 2019 refer to the basis thatfiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and/or 2019, respectively.

The recently declared pandemic related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) could adversely impact our future results, especially if our customers are negatively impacted by the decrease in economic activity caused by the virus. If our customers fail to reach budgeted revenue projections and reduce their expenditures proportionally, we are a going concern, which contemplates the realizationcould experience lower than expected growth in revenue or lower overall revenue. We could also experience delays or declines in revenue and new business and or implementations of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2016, we did not have any business operations. We have experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows, and have financed our recent working capital requirements primarily through the issuance of debt and equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As of December 31, 2016, our working capital deficiency was approximately $45,000 and our accumulated deficit was approximately $13,903,000. As a result, management believes that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Management is seeking to identify an operating company and engage in a mergermarketing campaigns if customers or business combination of some kind,potential customers delay or acquire assets or shares of an entity actively engaged in a business that generates sustained revenues. We are considering several potential acquisitions and is investigating various candidates to determine whether they would have the potential to add value to us for the benefit of our stockholders.

We do not intend to restrict our consideration to any particular business or industry segment, and we may consider, among other businesses, finance, brokerage, insurance, transportation, communications, services, natural resources, manufacturing or technology. Because we have limited resources, the scope and number of suitable candidates to merge with is relatively limited. Because we may participate in a business opportunity with a newly formed firm, a firm that is in the development stage, or a firm that is entering a new phase of growth, we may incur further riskcancel their plans due to the inability ofeconomic slowdown caused by the target’s management to have proven its abilities or effectiveness, or the lack of an established market for the target’s products or services, or the inability to reach profitability in the next few years.

Any business combination or transaction will likely result in a significant issuance of shares and substantial dilution tovirus. Additionally, our present stockholders. As it is expected that the closing of such a transaction will result in a change in control, such transaction is expected tooperations could be accounted for as a reverse merger, with the operating company being considered the legal acquiree and accounting acquirer,impacted, and we would be consideredcould experience higher costs if, despite our mitigation and prevention efforts, the legal acquirer and the accounting acquiree. As a result, at and subsequent to closing of any such transaction, the financial statements of the operating company would become our financial statements for all periods presented.virus spread prevents affected employees from performing key duties.

3.

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of PresentationAccounting Principles

The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

Use of Accounting Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesrevenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management's estimates are based on the facts and circumstances available at the time estimates are made, past historical experience, risk of loss, general economic conditions and trends and management's assessments of the probable future outcome of these matters. Consequently, actualperiod. Actual results could differ from suchthose estimates.



F-7

F-6Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our

Cash includes cash on hand. Cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments, with a remaining maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less for which the risk of changes in value is considered to be insignificant.

Accounts Receivable

We perform various analyses to evaluate accounts receivable balances and specifically identify those accounts which may periodically exceed federally insured limits. Wepresent them as a risk with respect to collectability of the accounts such that the amounts would reflect estimated net realizable value. Account balances are charged off after significant collection efforts have been made and potential for recovery is not experienced a loss in such accounts to date. We maintainconsidered probable. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we did not record any bad debts. As of September 30, 2020, and 2019, we evaluated our accounts receivables and determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts was not required.

Unbilled Receivables

We perform various analyses to evaluate work performed that will give us future billings rights under current contracts with financial institutionscustomers on jobs in progress. Under our revenue recognition policy and proportional revenue recognition, we recognize the buildup of cost related to these jobs in progress as unbilled receivables.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated life of the lease at the time the improvement is put into service. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with high credit ratings.Customers (Topic 606) which amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 establishes principles for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted ASU 2014-09 as of October 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, and concluded that, consistent with prior reporting, our revenues are primarily generated from our involvement marketing services and contracts which are typically billed based on time and materials or at a fixed price. If billed at a fixed price, revenue is recognized on a proportional performance basis as the services specified in the arrangement are performed. The determination of proportional performance revenue recognition is dependent on the nature of the services specified in the arrangement. Advanced payments on services and contracts are deferred and recorded as unearned revenues on our balance sheet until the earnings process has been completed and revenue is then recognized. Similarly, advanced services are deferred as unbilled receivables on our balance sheet until the earnings process has been completed and payment has been received before revenues and related costs are recognized. In all cases, we evaluate involvement marketing contracts to determine that the time and amount of services reflects the consideration expected to be received for the performance obligations that have been provided in accordance with the five-step process to recognize revenues as defined in Topic 606. Topic 606 defines contracts as written, oral and through customary business practice. Under this definition, we consider contracts to be created at the time that an order to provide services is agreed upon regardless of whether or not there is a written contract. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented in accordance with Topic 606.

The Company recognizes revenues based on the following steps:

1.

contract with customer has been identified

2.

performance obligations of the company have been identified

3.

a transaction price has been determined

4.

the price has been allocated appropriately to the performance obligations

5.

performance obligations are satisfied.

F-8

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The authoritative guidance with respect to

We follow Accounting Standards Codification 820-10 (“ASC 820-10”), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” for fair value established ameasurements. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measureestablishes a framework for measuring fair value, into three levels, and requires that assets and liabilities carried atexpands disclosures about fair value be classified and disclosed in onemeasurements. The standard provides a consistent definition of three categories, as presented below. Disclosure as to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value, measurements,which focuses on an exit price, which is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard also required.prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based information over entity specific information and establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement based on the nature of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as

The hierarchy established under ASC 820-10 gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for an identical assetassets or liability that we haveliabilities (Level 1) and the abilitylowest priority to accessunobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below:

Level 1 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of the measurementreporting date. Financial assetsAs required by ASC 820-10, we do not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where we hold a large position and liabilities utilizing a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.

Level 12 - Pricing inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.

Level 2. Inputs, other thanare quoted prices included within Level 1, whichfor similar investments, or inputs that are directly observable, for the asset or liabilityeither directly or indirectly, observablefor substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 includes investments valued at quoted prices adjusted for legal or contractual restrictions specific to these investments.

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.

are unobservable for the investment, that is, inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is3 includes investments that are supported by little or no market dataactivity.

Leases

Effective October 1, 2019, the Company began accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02 (see Note 14), applying the package of practical expedients to leases that commenced before the effective date whereby the Company elected to not reassess the following: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. For contracts entered into on or after the effective date, at the inception of a contract the Company assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. Our assessment is based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether we obtain the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether we have the right to direct the use of the asset. We allocate the consideration in the contract to each lease component based on its relative stand-alone price to determine the lease payments.

Operating lease Right-of-use assets represent the right to use the leased asset for the asset or liability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assetslease term and operating lease liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are measured using present value pricing models.

We determine the level in the fair value hierarchy within which each fair value measurement falls in its entirety,recognized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fairpresent value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, we perform an analysis of the assets and liabilitiesfuture minimum lease payments over the lease term at each reporting period end.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes undercommencement date. As most leases do not provide an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities forimplicit rate, the expected impactCompany used an incremental borrowing rate of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

We are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. As our net operating losses have yet to be utilized, all previous tax years remain open to examination by Federal authorities and other jurisdictions in which we currently operate or have operated in the past.

We account for uncertainties in income tax law under a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns as prescribed by GAAP. The tax effects of a position are recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority as of the reporting date. If the tax position is not considered “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, then no benefits of the position are recognized. As of December 31, 2016, we had not recorded any liability for uncertain tax positions. In subsequent periods, any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense.

We are currently delinquent with respect to our U.S. federal income tax filings for the past several years.

Stock-Based Compensation

We periodically issue stock options and warrants to officers, directors and consultants for services rendered. Stock options and warrants vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.

We account for stock-based payments to officers and directors by measuring the cost of services received in



F-7



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


exchange for equity awards5.5%, based on the grantinformation available at the adoption date fairin determining the present value of the awards, with the costfuture payments. Operating lease expense is recognized as compensation expense in our financial statementspursuant to on a straight-line basis over the vesting periodlease term and is included in rent in the consolidated statements of operations.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the awards.

We account for stock-based payments to consultants by determining thecarrying value of the stock compensation based upon the measurement date at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

Optionsan asset may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and warrants granted to outside consultantsEquipment. For assets that are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense inheld and used, impairment is recognized when the respective period. Asestimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date andasset or group of assets is less than their carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded foras the difference between the carrying value already recorded and fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the then currentlower of carrying value onor estimated net realizable value. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 there has not been any impairment of long-lived assets.

Income Taxes

Prior to February 14, 2018, the effective date of vesting.

The valuation of employee stock options is an inherently subjective process,the Business Combination, no provision for income taxes was recorded since market values are generally not available for long-term, non-transferable employee stock options. Accordingly, an option pricing model is utilized to derive an estimated fair value. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In calculating the estimated fair value of our stock options we use the Black-Scholes pricing model, which requires the consideration of the following six variables for purposes of estimating fair value:

·

the stock option exercise price;

·

the expected term of the option;

·

the grant price of the our common stock, which is issuable upon exercise of the option;

·

the expected volatility of our common stock;

·

the expected dividends on our common stock; and

·

the risk free interest rate for the expected option term.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

Stock Option Exercise Price and Grant Date Price of Common Stock.  The closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.

Expected Term.  The expected term of options granted is calculated using our historical option exercise transactions and reflects the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.

Expected Volatility.  The expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which our stock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of options granted.  We determine the expected volatility solely based upon the historical volatility of our common stock over a period commensurate with the option’s expected term.  We do not believe that the future volatility of our common stock over an option’s expected term is likely to differ significantly from the past.

Expected Dividends.  We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on any of our capital stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.  Accordingly, we use an expected dividend yield of zero to calculate the grant-date fair value of a stock option.

Risk-Free Interest Rate.  The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the option’s expected term on the grant date.

We were also required to estimate the level of award forfeitures expected to occur and record compensation expense only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest.  This requirement applies to all awards that are not yet vested.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is based upon the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period plus additional weighted-average common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, the proceeds of which are then assumed to have been used to repurchase outstanding common stock using the



F-8



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


treasury stock method. In addition, the numerator is adjusted for any changes in income that would result from the assumed conversion of potential shares. At December 31, 2016 and 2015 there were no potentially dilutive shares which would have the effect of being antidilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-12,Compensation-Stock Compensation(“ASU 2014-12”). The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 to provide specific guidance on share-based payment awards that provide for achievement of a specific performance target that could be achieved after the requisite service period. ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. As such,partnership for income tax purposes and the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributableincome or loss was passed through to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year. Earlier adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 may be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this guidance should be recognized in the financial statements as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date.Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.members.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15,Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance to U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is a substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This new rule requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, ASU 2014-15 (1) defines the term substantial doubt, (2) requires an evaluation of every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plan, (4) requires certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) requires an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) requires an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year.Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-15,Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 states that Staff at the Securities and Exchange Commission would not object to an entity deferring or presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing deferred debt issuance cost ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there were outstanding borrowings under the arrangement. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance and do not expect any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03,Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs(“ASU 2015-03”).ASU 2015-03 was issued to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendment requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount under Concepts Statement 6. Debt issuance costs are similar to a debt discount and in effect reduce the proceeds of borrowing, thereby increasing the effective interest rate. This amendment improves consistency with IFRS. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years, which is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016, the first day of our 2017 fiscal year.  Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have any significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

4.

Income Taxes

We are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States. The preparation of these tax returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could



F-9



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


affect the amount of tax paid by us. In consultation with our tax advisors, we base our tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal and state taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions taken by us (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, may require us to pay additional taxes. As required under applicable accounting rules, we accrue an amount for our estimate of additional income tax liability, including interest and penalties, which we could incur as a result of the ultimate or effective resolution of the uncertain tax positions. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

We account for uncertain income

F-9

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

In assessing the realization of deferred tax positions by accruing for the estimated additional amount of taxes for the uncertain tax positions when the uncertain tax position does not meet theassets, management considers whether it is more likely than not standardthat some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period. The valuation of employee stock options is an inherently subjective process, since market values are generally not available for sustaininglong-term, non-transferable employee stock options. Accordingly, the position.Black-Scholes option pricing model is utilized to derive an estimated fair value. The Black-Scholes pricing model requires the consideration of the following six variables for purposes of estimating fair value:

the stock option exercise price;

the expected term of the option;

the grant date price of our common stock, which is issuable upon exercise of the option;

the expected volatility of our common stock;

the expected dividends on our common stock (we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future); and

the risk free interest rate for the expected option term.

Expected Dividends. We reviewhave never declared or paid any cash dividends on any of our capital stock and updatedo not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, we use an expected dividend yield of zero to calculate the grant-date fair value of a stock option.

Expected Volatility. The expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which our accrualstock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of options granted. We determine the expected volatility solely based upon the historical volatility of our common stock over a period commensurate with the option’s expected term. We do not believe that the future volatility of our common stock over an option’s expected term is likely to differ significantly from the past.

Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the option’s expected term on the grant date.

Expected Term. For option grants subsequent to the adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of the accounting standards, the expected life of stock options granted is based on the actual vesting date and the end of the contractual term.

Stock Option Exercise Price and Grant Date Price of Common Stock. The closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.

We are required to estimate the level of award forfeitures expected to occur and record compensation expense only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest. This requirement applies to all awards that are not yet vested. Due to the limited number of unvested options outstanding, the majority of which are held by executives and members of our Board of Directors, we have estimated a zero forfeiture rate. We will revisit this assumption periodically and as more definitive information becomeschanges in the composition of the option pool dictate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We have evaluated all issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements and determined that, other than the following, they are either immaterial or not relevant to us.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) related to the accounting for leases. This pronouncement requires lessees to record most leases on their balance sheet, while expense recognition on the income statement remains similar to current lease accounting guidance. The guidance also eliminates real estate-specific provisions and modifies certain aspects of lessor accounting. Under the new guidance, lease classification as either a finance lease or an operating lease will determine how lease-related revenue and expense are recognized. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.

F-10

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

3.

Related Party Transactions

On January 3, 2012, we entered into a perpetual license agreement (the “Perpetual License”) with Mastermind Marketing, Inc. (the “Licensor”), which provides for licenses of trademarks, internet domains, and certain intellectual property as defined in the Perpetual License. The Licensor is one of our members and its chief executive officer is also our chief executive officer. The Perpetual License, which may be terminated at any time by either party, is effective January 3, 2012 and provides for aggregate payments of $2,100,000 over the calendar years from 2019 through 2039 with no further payments required after December 31, 2039. The Company has recorded expenses of $60,000 and $45,000 for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Included in prepaid expenses as of September 30, 2020, is $15,000 that will be expensed during the quarter ended December 31, 2020.

On January 3, 2014, we entered into a commercial lease agreement (the “Lease”) with 1450 West Peachtree, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Landlord”), for the lease of our corporate facility in Atlanta, Georgia. The manager of the Landlord is also our chief executive officer. The term of the lease is 10 years from the date of the agreement and provides for monthly rent and payment of operating expenses on a triple-net basis. The monthly rent terms of the lease have been altered by the landlord due to another tenant occupying space the Company verbally agreed to allow the landlord to remove from the space available to the company. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we made lease payments of $120,000 and $120,000, respectively, in satisfaction of our obligation pursuant to the Lease.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we made payments to our three members pursuant to the terms of our operating agreement, as amended, for services rendered to us. The Company recorded expenses to our three members during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, aggregating $705,471 and $851,240, respectively. Due to Covid-19 pandemic (see Note 1), each of the officers agreed to accept lower consulting fees for the year ended September 30, 2020. As of September 30, 2020, and 2019, we owed $100,000 and $-0-, respectively, to our three members for consulting services.

See Note 5 regarding license agreement.

4.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at September 30,

  

2020

  

2019

 

Furniture, fixtures and office equipment

 $130,598  $146,932 

Leasehold improvements

  73,795   73,795 
   204,393   220,727 

Less: accumulated depreciation

  (138,565

)

  (141,787

)

  $65,828  $78,940 

Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, was 27,053 and $29,190, respectively.

5.

Licensing Agreements

On January 3, 2012, we entered into a perpetual license agreement (the “Perpetual License”) with Mastermind Marketing, Inc. (the “Licensor”), which provides for licenses of trademarks, internet domains, and certain intellectual property as defined in the Perpetual License. The Licensor is one of our members and its chief executive officer is also our chief executive officer. The Perpetual License, which may be terminated at any time by either party, is effective January 3, 2012 and provides for aggregate payments of $2,100,000 over the calendar years from 2019 through 2039 with no further payments required after December 31, 2039. The Company has recorded expenses of $60,000 and $45,000 for the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Included in prepaid expenses as of September 30, 2020, is $15,000 that will be expensed during the quarter ended December 31, 2020.

F-11

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

In consideration for the Perpetual License, we agreed to pay the following fees through fiscal year 2040 (calendar year 2039):

Fiscal Years Ending September 30,

    

2021

 $60,000 

2022

  60,000 

2023

  60,000 

2024

  60,000 

2025

  60,000 

Thereafter

  1,680,000 
  $1,980,000 

6.

Notes Payable - PPP Loan

In April 2020, the Company received a loan pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), as administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”). The loan in the principal amount of $301,750 (the “PPP Loan”).

The PPP Loan matures on the two-year anniversary of the funding date and bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.00% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments, less the amount of any potential forgiveness (discussed below), will commence after the six-month anniversary of the funding date. The Company did not provide any collateral or guarantees for the PPP Loan, nor did the Company pay any facility charge to obtain the PPP Loan. The Promissory Note provides for customary events of default, including, among others, those relating to failure to make payment, bankruptcy, breaches of representations and material adverse effects. The Company may prepay the principal of the PPP Loan at any time without incurring any prepayment charges. The Company believes it has met all requirements for forgiveness of its PPP Loan, and intends to apply for loan forgiveness under the Cares Act.

7.

Commitments

On January 3, 2014, we entered into a commercial lease agreement (the “Lease”) with 1450 West Peachtree, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Landlord”), for the lease of our corporate facility in Atlanta, Georgia. The manager of the Landlord is also our chief executive officer. The term of the lease is 10 years from the date of the agreement and provides for monthly rent and payment of operating expenses on a triple-net basis. The monthly rent terms of the lease have been altered by the landlord due to another tenant occupying space the Company verbally agreed to allow the landlord to remove from the space available to the company. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we made lease payments of $120,000 and $120,000, respectively, in satisfaction of our obligation pursuant to the Lease.

The Lease provides for the following total lease commitments pursuant to the Lease and we have also provided our expected portion of the lease commitments based on the updated verbal agreement with the landlord:

Fiscal Years Ending September 30,

 

Total Lease

Commitment

  

Expected Lease

Commitment

 

2021

 $348,000  $120,000 

2022

  363,000   120,000 

2023

  384,000   120,000 

2024

  97,500   30,000 
  $1,192,500  $390,000 

8.

Income Taxes

Prior to February 14, 2018, the effective date of the Business Combination, no provision for income taxes was made since we were treated as a partnership for income tax purposes and the income or loss was passed through to our members.

We are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States. The preparation of these tax returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by us. In consultation with our tax advisors, we base our tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal and state taxing authorities upon completionin the jurisdictions in which we file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax audits, upon expirationpositions taken by us (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, may require us to pay additional taxes. As required under applicable accounting rules, we accrue an amount for our estimate of statutesadditional income tax liability, including interest and penalties, which we could incur as a result of limitation,the ultimate or upon occurrenceeffective resolution of other events. This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items and the probability of sustaining uncertain tax positions. The benefits of uncertain tax positions are recorded in our consolidated financial statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability thatWe account for income taxes using the uncertain tax positions will withstand challenge, if any, from tax authorities. When factsasset and circumstances change, we reassess these probabilitiesliability method. Under the asset and record any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate.

Reconciliation between our effective tax rate and the United States statutory rate is as follows:

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2016

 

2015

Expected federal tax rate

(35.0%) 

 

(35.0%) 

Change in valuation allowance

35.0%

 

35.0%

Net loss  

0.0%

 

0.0%

Deferredliability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based onrecognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of theexisting assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rate in effectrates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which thethose temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to reverse.be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax asset as it is more likely than not, based upon our analysis of all available evidence, that the tax benefit of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Significant components of ourestablished when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consists of the following:

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2016

 

2015

Net operating loss carryforwards

$

4,866,000 

 

$

4,863,000 

Valuation allowance

(4,866,000)

 

(4,863,000)

Net deferred tax assets

$

 

$

A valuation allowance has been established for our tax assets as their use is dependent on the generation of sufficient future taxable income, which cannotto amounts expected to be predicted at this time.realized.

Potential 382 Limitation

Our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service. Our ability to utilize our net operating loss (“NOL”) and alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) may be substantially limited due to ownership changes that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as



F-10



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


required by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as well as similar state provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and AMT that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined in Section 382 of the Code, results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50% of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders or public groups.

We have not completed a study to assess whether one or more ownership changes have occurred since we became a loss corporation as defined in Section 382 of the Code, but we believe that it is likely that an ownership change has occurred. If we have experienced an ownership change, utilization of the NOL and AMT would be subject to an annual limitation, which is determined by first multiplying the value of our common stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term, tax-exempt rate, and then could be subject to additional adjustments, as required. Any such limitation may result in the expiration of a portion of the NOL and AMT before utilization. Until a study is completed and any limitation known, no amounts are being considered as an uncertain tax position or disclosed as an unrecognized tax benefit under ASC 740. Any carryforwards that expire prior to utilization as a result of such limitations will be removed from deferred tax assets with a corresponding adjustment to the valuation allowance. Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, it is not expected that any potential limitation will have a material impact on our operating results.

As of December 31, 2016, we had federal tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13,903,000. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2026 through 2035.

As of December 31, 2016,September 30, 2020, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required. No interest and penalties have been recognized by us

F-12

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to date.

Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended December 31, 2016Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2015, we provided for no taxes in our statement of operations as we have significant net loss carryforwards.2019

Our net operating loss carryforwards

Tax returns are subject to review and possible adjustmentexamination by the Internal Revenue Servicefederal and state taxing authorities for generally three years after filed. There are subject to certain limitationsno income tax examinations currently in process.

Reconciliation between our effective tax rate and the event of cumulative changes in the ownership interest of significant stockholders over a three-year period in excess of 50%.

5.

Commitments and Contingencies

We had no commitments or contingenciesUnited States statutory rate is as of andfollows for the year ended September 30, 2020:

Statutory federal tax rate

-21.0

%

State income tax rate

-4.7

%

Utilization of prior estimates

48.6

%

Permanent differences

-0.8

%

Effective tax rate

22.1

%

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Significant components of our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consist of the following at September 30,

  

2020

  

2019

 

Deferred Tax Assets:

        

Future net operating loss benefit

 $31,900  $7,523 

Current liabilities

  56,361   23,157 

Deferred tax assets

  88,261   30,680 

Deferred Tax Liabilities:

        

Current assets

  232,526   150,031 

Deferred depreciation

  25,187   20,586 

Deferred tax liabilities

  257,713   170,617 

Net deferred tax liabilities

 $169,452  $139,937 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2016.2017, the transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. We have estimated our provision for income taxes in accordance with the Tax Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing.

Effective January 1, 2015,

9.

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

As of September 30, 2020, and 2019, we entered into an office sublease arrangement with Bamboo Holdings, LLC (“Bamboo”). Bamboo is owned by Mr. Yankowitz. The sublease arrangement, which was terminated duringwere authorized to issue a total 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. There are no shares of Preferred Stock issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2020, and 2019.

Common Stock

As of September 30, 2020, and 2019, we were authorized to issue a total of 125,000,000 shares of common stock, and there were 33,870,520 shares issued and outstanding.

Pursuant to the three months ended June 30, 2015, required Bamboo to pay us approximately $1,000 per month, the approximate fair market value for such space. Approximately $7,000 of sublease income was offset against our total rent expense of approximately $21,000 during year ended December 31, 2015 and is includedContribution Agreement in general and administrative expenses.

6.

Related Party Transactions

Effective January 1, 2015,2018, we entered into an office sublease arrangement with Bamboo Holdings, LLC (“Bamboo”). Bamboo is owned by Mr. Yankowitz. The sublease arrangement, which was terminated during the three months ended June 30, 2015, required Bamboo to pay us approximately $1,000 per month, the approximate fair market value for such space. Approximately $7,000 of sublease income was offset against our total rent expense of approximately $21,000 during year ended December 31, 2015 and is included in general and administrative expenses.

On February 3, 2015, we sold 20,000issued 29,236,759 shares of our common stock, in the aggregate, to PacificWave Partners Limited, which is ownedMastermind Marketing, Inc, a Georgia Corporation, Digital Advize, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, and Villanta Corporation, a Georgia Corporation. These three entities are controlled by Daniel A. Dodson, Ricardo Rios, and Michael Gelfond; respectively. Messrs. Dodson, Rios and Gelfond were appointed as our Assistant Secretary, for an aggregate sales priceexecutive officers upon the consummation of $20,000.the Business Consummation.

On March 16, 2015, PacificWave Partners Limited loaned us $5,000 for working capital purposes pursuant

F-13

Mastermind, Inc.
Notes to a short-term unsecured promissory note due March 31, 2015 with interest at 5%. The promissory note was repaid on March 23, 2015.Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

On July 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement with PacificWave Partners Limited to provide consulting and investment banking services to us, in particular with respect to raising capital for us and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. Henrik Rouf, who is our Assistant Secretary, is the Managing Director of PacificWave Partners Limited.



F-11Dividends



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


During the yearfiscal years ended December 31, 2015, PacificWave Partners Limited provided us an advance of approximately $2,000 to pay certain regulatory feesSeptember 30, 2020, and is included in our balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.2019, there were no dividends declared or paid.

On May 21, 2014, we sold 429,428 shares of common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for gross cash proceeds of approximately $140,000. PacificWave resold these shares to five accredited investors who were non-U.S. residents in an exempt transaction.

On November 23, 2015, we sold 946,666 shares of common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales price of approximately $946,000, or $1.00 per share. In addition, an additional 333,333 shares of our common stock and 114,334 shares of our common stock were reserved for future issuance to PacificWave Partners Limited and Henrik Rouf, the owner of PacificWave Partners Limiterd and our Assistant Secretary, respectively, for an aggregate price of approximately $447,000 or $1.00 per share.

7.

Stockholders’ Deficit

Common Stock

On February 3, 2015, we sold 20,000 shares of our common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales price of $20,000. On March 25, 2015, we sold an additional 40,000 shares of our common stock to two significant stockholders for an aggregate amount of $40,000.

On November 23, 2015, we sold 946,666 shares of common stock to PacificWave Partners Limited for an aggregate sales price of approximately $946,000, or $1.00 per share. In addition, an additional 333,333 shares of our common stock and 114,334 shares of our common stock were reserved for future issuance to PacificWave Partners Limited and Henrik Rouf, the owner of PacificWave Partners Limiterd and our Assistant Secretary, respectively, for an aggregate price of approximately $447,000 or $1.00 per share.

The share sale transaction was completed in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Rules 504, 505, 506 and 903 thereunder. The shares will not be registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws, and unless so registered, may not be reoffered or resold in the United States absent such registration or an applicable exemption therefrom, or in a transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act and other applicable securities laws.

Common Stock Options

On November 20, 2015, our board of directors approved the grant to Mr. Yankowitz of

As a non-qualified stock option exercisable into 473,334 shares of our common stock. The stock option was issued as compensation for services provided to us and to be provided through December 31, 2015. The stock option was immediately vested on the date of grant and exercisable at $0.15 per share. In determining the fair valuepart of the stock option, we utilized the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions: i) stock option exercise price of $0.15; ii) grant date price of our common stock of $1.00; iii) expected term of option of 5 years; iv) expected volatility of our common stock of 100%; v) expected dividend rate of 0.0%; and vi) risk-free interest rate of 0.0%. Accordingly, we recorded stock-based compensation in general and administrative expenses of approximately $433,000merger transaction during the year ended December 31, 2015.September 30, 2018, 525,667 common stock options were issued to Mr. Bennett Yankowitz, our former chief executive officer and sole director. These options were issued fully-vested and exercisable at an exercise price of $0.15 per share with an expiration date of November 20, 2021. There were no stock options issued in 2016.exercised during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019. As of September 30, 2020, and 2019, there were 525,667 fully-vested, non-qualified common stock options exercisable, respectively, at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

8.

Legal Proceedings

10.

Contingencies

Other than as stated herein, weWe are not a party to any other legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, which we believe will not have a material affecteffect on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2016, Investment Services V Devkom International, LLC (“Devkom”)

11.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Major Customers and Suppliers

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 there were 12 revenue-producing clients. Revenue-producing clients are defined as those companies and divisions of such that have autonomous hiring/firing of marketing firms. Of these 12 clients, four represented over 10% of gross margin. Total gross margin for these four clients totaled $1,959,102.

12.

Operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities

Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at the present value of the future lease payments at the lease commencement date. The interest rate used to determine the present value is our incremental borrowing rate, estimated to be 5.5%, one of our former controlling shareholders, filed a complaint inas the Eighth Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada against us, PacificWave Partners Limited (“PWP”), PWP’s principal, Henrik Rouf, Bennett Yankowitz, our President and sole director, and Mr. Yankowitz’s former law firm. The complaint contained several claims for relief arising out of an alleged breach of a contract between Devkom and PWP for the purchase of a controlling interest rate implicit in our stock in May 2014. The breach alleged waslease is not readily determinable. Operating lease expense is recognized pursuant to ASC Topic 842. Leases (Topic 842) over the failurelease term. During the years ended September 30, 2020, and 2019, the Company recorded rent expense of PWP$120,000 and $120,000, respectively.

In adopting Topic 842, the Company has elected the ‘package of practical expedients’, which permit it not to pay approximately $76,000 to Devkomreassess under the new standard its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company did not elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements; the latter is not applicable to the Company. In addition, the Company elected not to apply ASC Topic 842 to arrangements with lease terms of 12 month or less. During the contract. Other claims included breachyear ended September 30, 2020, upon adoption of an implied escrow agreement, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. Devkom sought to recover general, exemplary and punitive damages. In August 2016, the Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice.



F-12



COCONNECT, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016


In June 2017, Devkom filed a similar complaint against the same defendants in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. In June 2017, we and PWP filed a motion to quash the service of the summons and complaint in the action on the grounds that the Court has no jurisdiction overASC Topic 842, the Company or PWPrecorded right-of-use assets and that service was defective. At the same time, Mr. Yankowitz and his former law firm filed demurrers to alllease liabilities of the causes$461,740.

Right-of- use assets are summarized below:

  

September 30, 2020

 

Office lease

 $461,740 

Less accumulated amortization

  (97,026

)

Right-of-us assets, net

 $364,714 

Operating lease liabilities are summarized as follows:

  

September 30, 2020

 

Lease liability

 $364,714 

Less current portion

  (102,499

)

Long term portion

 $262,215 

F-14

Maturity of action specified in the complaint.lease liabilities are as follows:

A hearing on the motion to quash and the demurrers was held on January 5, 2018.

  

Amount

 

For the year ending September 30, 2021

 $120,000 

For the year ending September 30, 2022

  120,000 

For the year ending September 30, 2023

  120,000 

For the four months ending January 31, 2024

  40,000 

Total

 $400,000 

Less: present value discount

  (35,286

)

Lease liability

 $364,714 

12.

Subsequent Events

The Court made a tentative ruling upholding our motion to quash, which if finalized, will have the effect of dismissing us as a defendant in the suit. A further hearing is scheduled for February 2, 2018.

9.

Subsequent Events

WeCompany has evaluated allsubsequent events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when we issued thesethe financial statements. Other than the legal proceedings discussed in Note 8, we did not have any material recognizable subsequentstatements were issued. The Company has determined that there are no other such events during this period.








SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13that warrant disclosure or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: January 23, 2018

CoConnect, Inc.

By:

/s/ Bennett J. Yankowitz

Bennett J. Yankowitz

President


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant andrecognition in the capacities and onfinancial statements, except as stated below.

On January 4, 2021, the dates indicated.Company issued in the aggregate 635,000 shares of restricted common stock to consultants for services. 


Dated: January 23, 2018

/s/ Bennett J. Yankowitz

Bennett J. Yankowitz

President







F-15