Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from          to         

 

Commission file number 1-13627

 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

DELAWARE

    

26-4413382

(State of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

350 Indiana Street, Suite 800

 

 

Golden, Colorado

 

80401

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(303) 839-5060

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

    

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

 

NYSE MKTAmerican

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

 

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer 

       Non accelerated filer  Smaller reporting company          Emerging growth company ☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐  No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒  No ☐

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20162018 was approximately $30,003,238,$17.9 million, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock of $0.65$0.34 per share on the NYSE MKTAmerican on June 30, 2016.2018. For the purpose of this calculation, the registrant has assumed that its affiliates as of June 30, 20162018 included all directors and officers and one shareholder that held approximately 47%43% of its outstanding common stock. The number of shares of common stock outstanding on February 24, 201727, 2019 was 89,658,910.96,399,391.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents

 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

FORM 10-K

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162018

 

INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

PAGE

PART I

 

ITEM 1 AND ITEM 2 

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

8

ITEM 1A 

RISK FACTORS

33 30

ITEM 1B 

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

46 42

ITEM 3 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

46 43

ITEM 4 

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

46 43

PART II

 

ITEM 5 

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

47 44

ITEM 6 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

48 44

ITEM 7 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

49 45

ITEM 8 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

61 53

ITEM 9 

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

61 54

ITEM 9A 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

61 54

ITEM 9B 

OTHER INFORMATION

62 54

PART III

 

ITEM 10 

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

63 55

ITEM 11 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

63 55

ITEM 12 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

63 55

ITEM 13 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

63 55

ITEM 14 

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

63 55

PART IV

 

ITEM 15 

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

64 56

ITEM 16 

PREPARATION OF STATEMENT OR REPORT

65 57

EXHIBITS

65 57

SIGNATURES 

69 62

 

 

 

2


 

Table of Contents

References to “Golden Minerals, the “Company,” “our,” “we,” or “us” mean Golden Minerals Company, its predecessors and consolidated subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context requires. Many of the terms used in our industry are technical in nature. We have included a glossary of some of these terms below.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Some information contained in or incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other applicable securities laws. We use the words “anticipate,” “continue,” “likely,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “project,” “should,” “believe” and similar expressions (including negative and grammatical variations) to identify forward-looking statements.  These statements include statementscomments relating to our plans, expectations regardingand assumptions concerning the Velardeña oxide plant lease, including its durationthe expected term, anticipated revenues, care and revenues, expectations related to ourmaintenance costs, and potential future tailings expansion; the El Quevar project, including assumptions and projections contained in the El Quevar PEA (including life of mine, grade and production expectations); the Santa Maria property, including the assumptions and Rodeo propertiesprojections contained in Mexico including planned explorationthe Santa Maria PEA (including life of mine, grade and production expectations), and other expectations regarding the project, including future drilling plans, timing of initial drill results, expansion potential for the existing deposit and general cost expectations; the Rodeo property, including our general evaluation workplans and costs, plannedcost expectations; the Yoquivo project, including future drilling plans and exploration activities and costs related toactivities; our other exploration properties,financial outlook in 2019, including anticipated 2017 income and expenditures during the year; expected need for external financing costs and expectations related to our El Quevar project, and statements concerning our financial condition, business strategies and business and legal risks. Although we believe the expectations and assumptions reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these expectations and assumptions will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors described in this annual report on Form 10-K, including:

Higher than anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties in Mexico or at El Quevar in Argentina; 

Lower revenue than anticipated from the oxide plant lease, which could result from delays or problems at the third party's mine or at the oxide plant, permitting problems at the third party's mine or the oxide plant, delays in constructing additional tailings capacity at the oxide plant, earlier than expected termination of the lease or other causes; 

 

·

Higher than anticipated care and maintenance costs at El Quevar in Argentina or the Velardeña Properties in Mexico; 

Continued decreasesDecreases or insufficient increases in silver and gold prices;

 

Whether we are able to raise the necessary capital required to continue our business on terms acceptable to us or at all, and the likely negative effect of continued low silver and gold prices or unfavorable exploration results;  

 

Unfavorable results from exploration at ourthe Santa Maria, Rodeo, Yoquivo, Navegantes or other exploration properties and whether we will be able to advance our Santa Maria and Rodeo propertiesthese or other exploration properties; 

 

Risks related to the El Quevar project in Argentina, including whether we will be able to fund further exploration ourselves or find a joint venture partner to advance the project,unfavorable results from our evaluation activities, the feasibility and economic viability and unexpected costs of maintaining the project, and whether we will be able to find a joint venture partner or secure adequate financing to further advance the project; 

 

3


Table of Contents

Variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that are or may be located at the Velardeña Properties or the Company'sour exploration properties, changes in interpretations of geological information, and unfavorable results of metallurgical and other tests; 

 

·

Whether we will be able to mine and sell minerals successfully or profitably at any of our current properties at current or future silver and gold prices and achieve our objective of becoming a mid-tier mining company; 

 

3


Table of Contents

Potential delays in our exploration activities or other activities to advance properties towards mining resulting from environmental consents or permitting delays or problems, accidents, problems with contractors, disputes under agreements related to exploration properties, unanticipated costs and other unexpected events; 

 

Our ability to retain key management and mining personnel necessary to successfully operate and grow our business;

 

Economic and political events affecting the market prices for gold, silver, zinc, lead and other minerals that may be found on our exploration properties; 

 

Political and economic instability in Argentina, Mexico Argentina, and other countries in which we conduct our business and future actions of any of these governments with respect to nationalization of natural resources or other changes in mining or taxation policies; 

 

·

Volatility in the market price of our common stock; and

 

The factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such expectations may prove to be materially incorrect due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. You should not unduly rely on any of our forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us and persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this section and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL

“Mineralized material” as used in this annual report on Form 10-K, although permissible under the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. We cannot be certain that any deposits at the Velardeña Properties, any part of the Yaxtché deposit at the El Quevar, projectSanta Maria or Rodeo properties or any deposits at our other exploration properties, will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the disclosed mineralized material estimates will ever be confirmed or converted into reserves or that mineralized material can be economically or legally extracted. In addition, in this annual report on Form 10-K we also modify our estimates made in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 to conform to SEC Industry Guide 7 for reporting in the United States. Mineralized material is substantially equivalent to measured and indicated mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) as disclosed for reporting purposes in Canada, except that the SEC only permits issuers to report “mineralized material” in tonnage and average grade without reference to contained ounces.

 

4


 

Table of Contents

CONVERSION TABLE

 

In this annual report on Form 10-K, figures are presented in both United States standard and metric measurements. Conversion rates from United States standard measurement systems to metric and metric to United States standard measurement systems are provided in the table below. All currency references in this annual report on Form 10-K are to United States dollars, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Unit

    

Metric Measure

    

Metric Unit

    

U.S. Measure

 

1 acre

 

0.4047 hectares

 

1 hectare

 

2.47 acres

 

1 foot

 

0.3048 meters

 

1 meter

 

3.28 feet

 

1 mile

 

1.609 kilometers

 

1 kilometer

 

0.62 miles

 

1  ounce (troy)

 

31.103 grams

 

1 gram

 

0.032 ounces (troy)

 

1 ton

 

0.907 tonnes

 

1 tonne

 

1.102 tons

 

 

 

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED MINING TERMS

 

Base Metal” means a classification of non-ferrous metals usually considered to be of low value and higher chemical activity when compared with the precious metals (gold, silver, platinum, etc.). This nonspecific term generally refers to the high-volume, low-value metals copper, lead, tin, and zinc.

 

Breccia” means rock consisting of fragments, more or less angular, in a matrix of finer-grained material or of cementing material.

 

Calcareous Clastic” means sedimentary rock composed of siliciclastic particles usually of conglomerate, sand, or silt-size and cemented by calcium carbonate in the form of calcite.

 

Claim” means a mining interest giving its holder the right to prospect, explore for and exploit minerals within a defined area.

 

Concentrates” means the clean product of ore or metal separated from its containing rock or earth by froth flotation or other methods of mineral separation.

 

Concession” means a grant or lease of a tract of land made by a government or other controlling authority in return for stipulated services or a promise that the land will be used for a specific purpose.

 

Core Drill” means a rotary type of rock drill that cuts a core of rock and is recovered in long cylindrical sections, usually two centimeters or more in diameter.

 

Deposit” means an informal term for an accumulation of minerals.

 

Development Stage” means a project with an established resource, not in production, engaged in the process of additional studies preparing for completion of a feasibility study or for commercial extraction.

 

Diorite” means a grey to dark grey intermediate intrusive igneous rock composed principally of plagioclase feldspar, (typically andesine), biotite, hornblende, and/or pyroxene.

Doré” means gold and silver bullion that remains in a cupelling furnace after the lead has been oxidized and skimmed off.

 

Epithermal Calcite-Quartz” means deposits, typically occurring in veins, of calcite-quartz from hydrothermal fluids at shallow depths under conditions in the lower ranges of temperature and pressure.

5


 

Table of Contents

 

Euhedral” means a well-developed degree of which mineral grains show external crystal faces (fully crystal-faced).faces.

 

Exploration Stage” means a project that is not yet in either the Development Stage or Production Stage.

 

Feasibility Study” means an engineering study designed to define the technical, economic, and legal viability of a mining project with a high degree of reliability.

 

Flotation” means the separating of finely crushed minerals from one another by causing some to float in a froth and others to remain in suspension in the pulp. Oils and various chemicals are used to activate, make floatable, or depress the minerals.

 

Formation” means a distinct layer of sedimentary or volcanic rock of similar composition.

 

Fracture System” means a set or group of contemporaneous fractures relatedformed by stress.a stress system.

 

Grade” means the metal content of ore, usually expressed in troy ounces per ton (2,000 pounds) or in grams per ton or metric tonnes, which contain 2,204.6 pounds or 1,000 kilograms.

Inferred Resource” means the part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

 

Laramide Orogeny” means a period of mountain building in western North America, which started in the Late Cretaceous age, 70 to 80 million years ago, and ended 35 to 55 million years ago.

 

Mineralization” means the concentration of metals within a body of rock.

 

Mineralized Material” means a mineralized body that has been defined by appropriate drilling and/or underground sampling to establish continuity and support an estimate of tonnage and an average grade of the selected metals.

 

Mining” means the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves or mineral deposits to produce a marketable metal or mineral product. Exploration continues during the mining process and, in many cases, mineral reserves or mineral deposits are expanded during the life of the mine activities as the exploration potential of the deposit is realized.

 

Monzodiorite” means coarse-grained igneous rock consisting of essential plagioclase feldspar, orthoclase feldspar, hornblende and biotite, with or without pyroxene, with plagioclase being the dominant feldspar making up 6% to 90% of the total feldspar and varying from oligoclase to andesine in composition. The presence of the orthoclase feldspar distinguishes this rock from a diorite.

 

National Instrument 43-101” or “NI 43-101” means the standards of disclosure for mineral projects prescribed by the Canadian Securities Administrators.

 

Net Smelter Return Royalty” means a defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, less a proportionate share of transportation, insurance, and processing costs.

 

Open Pit” means a mine working or excavation open to the surface.

 

6


Table of Contents

Ore” means material containing minerals that can be economically extracted.

 

Outcrop” means that part of a geologic formation or structure that appears at the surface of the earth.

 

Oxide” means mineralized rock in which some of the original minerals have been oxidized (i.e., combined with oxygen).

6


Table of Contents

 

Precious Metal” means any of several relatively scarce and valuable metals, such as gold, silver, and the platinum-group metals.

 

Preliminary Economic Assessment” or “PEA” means a study, other than a pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study, that includes an economic analysis of the potential viability of mineral resources.

 

Probable Mineral Reserves” means mineral reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for Proven Mineral Reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for Proven Mineral Reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

 

Production Stage” means a project that is actively engaged in the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves or mineral deposits to produce a marketable metal or mineral product.

 

Proven Mineral Reserves” means mineral reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established.

 

Reclamation” means the process of returning land to another use after mining is completed.

 

Recovery” means that portion of the metal contained in the ore that is successfully extracted by processing, expressed as a percentage.

 

Mineral Reserves” means that part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of mineral reserve determination.

 

Sampling” means selecting a fractional part of a mineral deposit for analysis.

 

Sediment” means solid fragmental material that originates from weathering of rocks and is transported or deposited by air, water, or ice, or that accumulates by other natural agents, such as chemical precipitation from solution or secretion by organisms, and that forms in layers on the earth’s surface at ordinary temperatures in a loose, unconsolidated form.

 

Sedimentary” means formed by the deposition of Sediment.

 

Silver Equivalent” means silver and gold only, with gold converted to silver equivalents at a 70 to 1specified ratio.

 

Skarn” means a coarse-grained metamorphic rock formed by the contact metamorphism of carbonate rock often containing garnet, pyroxene epodite and wollastonnite.

 

Stock” means discordant igneous intrusion having a surface exposure of less than 40 square miles.

 

Sulfide” means a compound of sulfur and some other element.metallic element or elements.

7


Table of Contents

 

Tailings Pond” means a low-lying depression used to confine tailings, the prime function of which is to allow enough time for heavy metalsprocessed minerals to settle out or for cyanide to be destroyed before water is discharged into the local watershed.

 

7


Table of Contents

Tertiary” means the first period of the Cenozoic Era (after the Cretaceous of the Mesozoic Era and before the Quaternary) thought to have covered the span of time between 2 to 3 million years ago and 65 million years ago.

 

Vein” means a fissure, fault or crack in a rock filled by minerals that have traveled upwards from some deep source.

 

Waste” means rock lacking sufficient grade and/or other characteristics of Ore.ore.

8


Table of Contents

PART I

 

ITEMS 1 AND 2:  BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

 

Overview

 

We are a mining company and we ownholding a 100% interest in the El Quevar advanced exploration silver property in the province of Salta, Argentina, a 100% interest in the Velardeña and Chicago precious metals mining properties and associated oxide and sulfide processing plants in the State of Durango, Mexico (the “Velardeña Properties”), the El Quevar advanced exploration silver property in the province of Salta, Argentina, and a diversified portfolio of precious metals and other mineral exploration properties located primarily in or near historical precious metals producing regions of Mexico. The Velardeña Properties and the El Quevar advanced exploration property and the Velardeña Properties are our only material properties.

        We remain focused on evaluation activities at our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina and on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America with near term prospects of mining, including properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants.  We are also focused and are continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 12 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico. Our management team is comprised of experienced mining professionals with extensive expertise in mineral exploration, mine construction and development, and mine operations. Our principal offices areoffice is located in Golden, Colorado at 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800, Golden, CO 80401, and our registered office is the Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. We also maintain an office at the Velardeña Properties in Mexico and exploration offices in Argentina and Mexico.

       None of our properties are currently in production.  We are primarily focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, and particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña Properties, including our Velardeña oxide and sulfide plants. The Company is also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico. The Company is continuing its exploration efforts on selected properties in its portfolio of approximately 10 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico. We continue to hold our El Quevar advanced exploration property in Argentina on care and maintenance until we can fund further exploration ourselves or find a partner to further advance the project.

 

No Proven or Probable Mineral Reserves/Exploration Stage Company

 

We are considered an exploration stage company under the SEC criteria since we have not demonstrated the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves at our Velardeña Properties or any of our other properties. In SEC Industry Guide 7, the SEC defines a “reserve” as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Proven or probable mineral reserves are those reserves for which (a) quantity is computed and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are spaced so closely that the geologic character is defined and size, shape and depth of mineral content can be established (proven) or the sites are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced but high enough to assume continuity between observation points (probable). Mineral Reservesreserves cannot be considered proven or probable unless and until they are supported by a feasibility study, indicating that the mineral reserves have had the requisite geologic, technical and economic work performed and are economically and legally extractable.

 

Prior to suspending mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties in November 2015, we had revenues from the sale of silver, gold, lead and zinc products from the Velardeña and Chicago mines. We have not completed a feasibility study with regard to all or a portion of any of our properties to date. Any mineralized material discovered or extracted by us should not be considered proven or probable mineral reserves. As of December 31, 2016,2018, none of our mineralized material met the definition of proven or probable mineral reserves. We expect to remain an exploration stage company for the foreseeable future, even though we were extracting and processing mineralized material.future. We will not exit the exploration stage until such time, if ever, that we demonstrate the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves that meet the guidelines under SEC Industry Guide 7.

 

8


Table of Contents

Company History

 

We were incorporated in Delaware under the Delaware General Corporation Law in March 2009. From March 2009 through September 2011, we focused on the advancement of our El Quevar silver project in Argentina. On

9


Table of Contents

September 2, 2011, we completed a business combination transaction with ECU Silver Mining Inc. (“ECU”) and now own, resulting in our ownership of the Velardeña and Chicago silver, gold and base metals mines located in the Velardeña mining district in the State of Durango, Mexico as further described below under “—Velardeña Properties”. Since the business combination with ECU, we have focused primarily on the further advancement and improvement of the Velardeña Properties, as well as identifying and establishing other mining opportunities with near term prospects.

 

Corporate Structure

 

Golden Minerals Company, headquartered in Golden, Colorado, is the operating entity through which we conduct our business.  Following our September 2, 2011 business combination, ECU became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Minerals, and two of ECU’s wholly-owned Mexican subsidiaries hold the assets and rights associated with the Velardeña Properties. We have a number of other wholly-owned subsidiaries organized throughout the world, including in Mexico, Central America, South America, the Caribbean and Europe. We generally hold our exploration rights and properties through subsidiaries organized in the countries in which our rights and properties are located.

 

Our Competitive Strengths and Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy is to establish Golden Minerals as a mid-tier precious metals mining company focused in Mexico.North America and Argentina. We also review strategic opportunities from time to time.

El Quevar Project.  We continue to advance our El Quevar project in Argentina and in September 2018 we completed an updated preliminary economic assessment (the “El Quevar PEA”).  The El Quevar PEA contemplates a six-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at a mine production rate of 1,200 tonnes per day using a post-pillar cut-and-fill mining method that will deliver approximately 2.45 million tonnes of diluted sulfide material at an average grade of 409 g/t silver. As contemplated in the PEA, the mined material would be processed using a conventional single product flotation mill that would produce a silver-rich bulk concentrate suitable for sale.  We remain open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration and development of the project.

Velardeña Properties.Due to continuing net operating losses, we suspended mining and sulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties during the first half of November 2015 in order to conserve the future value of the asset. We have placed the mine and sulfide processing plant on care and maintenance to enable a re-start of either the mine or the mill when we are able to develop mining and processing plans that at then current prices for silver and metals prices supportgold indicate a cashsustainable positive outlookoperating margin (defined as revenues less costs of sales) or we are able to locate, acquire and develop alternative mineral sources that could be economically mined and transported to the Velardeña Properties for the property.processing.  The Velardeña Properties include

a 300 tonne per day flotation sulfide mill, which includes three flotation circuits in which we can process sulfide material to make lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates.  The properties also include a conventional 550 tonne per day cyanide leach oxide mill with a Merrill-Crowe precipitation circuit and flotation circuit located adjacent to our Chicago mine.  In July 2015, we entered into a leasing agreement withleased the oxide plant to Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (“Hecla”), a Mexican corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company, to lease our Velardeña oxide plant for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. During the third quarter 2016 Hecla exercisedprocess its right to extend the initial 18-month term for six additional months until June 30, 2017, as permitted under the original lease agreement. As contemplated by the original agreement, the Company and Hecla also reached an agreement regarding an expansion of the tailings impoundment, at Hecla's cost, to accommodate Hecla's use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The agreed expansion is estimated to cost approximately $1.5 million, and we have obtained the necessary permits for such expansion. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed that Hecla has the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until December 31, 2018.

Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Hecla processed approximately 136,000 tonnes ofown material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $6.4 million, comprised of approximately $3.0 million for direct plant charges plus fixed fees and other net reimbursable costs totaling approximately $3.4 million. We incurred costs of approximately $2.0 million related to the services we provide under theplant.  The lease for a net margin of $4.4 million during 2016.with Hecla reached its intended processing throughput of approximately 400 tonnes per day during 2016 and, at this rate, net cash payments to us, net of reimbursable costs, should total approximately $0.4 million per month, including variable and fixed fees, or nearly $5.0 million annually.

El Quevar Project.has since been extended through December 31, 2020.  We continue to holdevaluate and search for other oxide and sulfide feed sources, focusing on sources within haulage distance of our El Quevar property on caresulfide and maintenance until we can fund further exploration ourselves or find oxide mills at the Velardeña partner to fund further exploration.Properties.

10


Table of Contents

Exploration Focus. We are focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with high precious metal grades and low development costs with near term prospects of mining, and particularly properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña Properties, which may includeprocessing plants. We are also continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 12 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico. During the last two years, we have continued to focus on the Santa Maria mine west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, and in October 2018 we completed a second preliminary economic assessment (the “Santa Maria PEA”) on the project. Our Rodeo

9


Table of Contents

property located west of the Velardeña Properties in Durango.

During the first two quartersalso remains an interesting asset and we have received confirmation of 2016 we mined approximately 4,500 tonnes of material from the Santa Maria mine as bulk samples with grades of approximately 235 grams per tonne (“gpt”) silver and 0.7 gpt gold. During February 2017, we completed a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) on the Santa Maria property. The PEA results reported by the engineering firm of Tetra Tech, Inc (“Tetra Tech”), based on an updated estimate of mineralized material, show a potentially profitable operation based on a 200 tonnes per day mining rate and processing at a local third party mill.  See “—Exploration Properties –Santa Maria” below for additional information regarding the Santa Maria Tetra Tech report.

In June 2016, we began a 2,080 meter core drilling program at the Rodeo property.  The results from the program showed agood gold and silver bearing epithermal vein and breccia system with encouraging gold and silver values over an approximate 50 to 70 meter true width. During January 2017, Tetra Tech completed an estimatemetallurgical recoveries for milled material in initial test work. Additionally, new discoveries of mineralized materialhigh-grade silver-gold assays at the Rodeo deposit, which presents two mineralized material estimates based on two different operating scenarios. See “—Exploration Properties—Rodeo” below for additional information regardingclaims in the Rodeo Tetra Tech report.

Yoquivo District of Chihauhua, Mexico have led us to consider a drill program in 2019. During 20172019 we plan to focus our exploration efforts primarily at our El Quevar silver project and on the Santa Maria mineexploration and exploration on certain otherevaluation activities at Yoquivo, Navegantes and several new properties including Rodeo.in Mexico recently acquired through staking. We expect our expenditures for the exploration program in 20172019 to be approximately $1.8 million.$ 3.3 million,  subject to the availability of sufficient funds.

 

Experienced Management Team.  We are led by a team of mining professionals with approximately 60 years of combined experience in exploration, project development, and operations management, primarily in the Americas. Our executive officers have held senior positions at various large mining companies including, among others, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, INCO Limited, Meridian Gold Company, Barrick Gold Exploration and Noranda Exploration.

 

El Quevar

Location and Access

Our El Quevar silver project is located in the San Antonio de los Cobres municipality, Salta Province, in the altiplano region of northwestern Argentina, approximately 300 kilometers by road northwest of the city of Salta, the capital city of the province. The project is also accessible by a 300 kilometer dirt and gravel road from the city of Calama in northern Chile. The small village of Pocitos, located about 20 kilometers to the west of El Quevar, is the nearest settlement. We have established a camp approximately 10 kilometers west of the project to house project workers. A high tension power line is located approximately 40 kilometers from the site, and a high pressure gas line devoted to the mining industry and subsidized by the Salta government is located within four kilometers of the El Quevar camp.

The El Quevar project is located near Nevado Peak with altitudes at the concessions ranging from 3,800 to 6,130 meters above sea level. The climate of the area is high mountain desert, with some precipitation in summer (such as snow) and little snow in winter.

10


Table of Contents

The following map shows the location of the El Quevar project.

Picture 4

Property History

Mining activity in and around the El Quevar project dates back at least 80 years. Between 1930 and 1950, there was lead and silver extraction of mineralized materials from small workings in the area, but we have no mining records from that period. The first organized exploration activities on the property occurred during the 1970s, although no data from that period remains. Over the last 30 years, several companies have carried out exploration activity in the area, including BHP Billiton, Industrias Peñoles, Mansfield Minerals and Hochschild Mining Group, consisting primarily of local sampling with some limited drilling programs.

Title and Ownership Rights

According to Argentine law, mineral resources are subject to regulation in the provinces where the resources are located. Each province has the authority to grant mining exploration permits and mining exploitation concession rights to applicants. The Federal Congress has enacted the National Mining Code and other substantive mining legislation, which is applicable throughout Argentina; however, each province has the authority to regulate the procedural aspects of the National Mining Code and to organize the enforcement authority within its own territory.

11


Table of Contents

In the province of Salta, where the El Quevar project is located, all mining concessions are granted by a judge in the Salta Mining Court. The El Quevar project is comprised of exploitation concessions. Exploitation concessions are subject to a canon payment fee (maintenance fee) which is paid in advance twice a year (before June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year). Each time a new mining concession is granted, concession holders are exempt from the canon payment fee for a period of three years from the concession grant date. However, this exemption does not apply to the grant of vacant exploitation concessions; only to the grant of new mining concessions.

The El Quevar project is currently comprised of 31 mining concessions that we hold directly. In total, the El Quevar project encompasses approximately 57,000 hectares. The area of most of our exploration activities at El Quevar is within the concessions that are owned by Silex Argentina S.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

We are required to pay a 1% net smelter return royalty on the value of all minerals extracted from the El Quevar II concession and a 1% net smelter return royalty on one-half of the minerals extracted from the Castor concession to the third party from whom we acquired these concessions.  We can purchase one half of the royalty for $1 million in the first two years of production.  The Yaxtché deposit is located primarily on the Castor concession. We may also be required to pay a 3% royalty to the Salta Province based on the net smelter value of minerals extracted from any of our concessions less costs of processing. To maintain all of the El Quevar concessions, we paid canon payment fees to the Argentine government of approximately $111,000 and $57,000 in 2017 and 2018, respectively. In 2019 we expect to pay approximately $60,000. 

The following El Quevar mine concessions are identified below by name and file number in the Salta Province Registry of Mines.

12


Table of Contents

Name of Mine Concession

Concession
File Number

Quevar II

17114

Quirincolo I

18036

Quirincolo II

18037

Castor

3902

Vince

1578

Armonia

1542

Quespejahuar

12222

Toro I

18332

Quevar Primera

19534

Quevar Novena

20215

Quevar Decimo Tercera

20501

Quevar Tercera

19557

Quevar Vigesimo Tercero

21043

Quevar 10

20219

Quevar Vigesimo Primera

20997

Quevar Vigesimo Septima

22403

Quevar IV

19558

Quevar Vigesimo Cuarto

21044

Quevar 11

20240

Quevar Quinta

19617

Quevar 12

20360

Quevar Decima Quinta

20445

Quevar Sexta

19992

Quevar 19

20706

Quevar Vigesimo Sexta

22087

Quevar Vigesimo Segundo

21042

Quevar Séptima

20319

Quevar Veinteava

20988

Mariana

15190

Arjona II

18080

Quevar Vigesimo Quinto

21054

The surface rights at El Quevar are controlled by the Salta Province. There are no private properties within the concession area. To date, no issues involving surface rights have impacted the project. Although we have unrestricted access to our facilities, we have been granted easements to further protect our access rights.

Geology and Mineralization

The geology of the El Quevar project is characterized by silver-rich veins and disseminations in Tertiary volcanic rocks that are part of an eroded stratovolcano. Silver mineralization at El Quevar is hosted within a broad, generally east-west-trending structural zone and occurs as a series of north-dipping parallel sheeted vein zones, breccias and mineralized faults situated within an envelope of pervasively silicified brecciated volcanic rocks. There are at least three sub-parallel structures that extend for an aggregate length of approximately 6.5 kilometers. Several volcanic domes (small intrusive bodies) have been identified and mineralization is also found in breccias associated with these domes, especially where

13


Table of Contents

they are intersected by the structures. The silver mineralization at the Yaxtché zone is of epithermal origin. The cross-cutting nature of the mineralization, the assemblage of sulfide and alteration minerals, and the presence of open spaces with euhedral minerals, all point to an origin at shallow to moderate depths (a few hundred meters below surface) from hydrothermal solutions.

Mineralized Material Estimate

During 2012, we released an estimate of mineralized material at our El Quevar project.  This estimate assumed mining of oxide material from an open pit on the east end of the Yaxtché deposit and sulfide material from both the open pit and an underground mine on the western portion of the Yaxtché deposit.  The estimate was based on results from 270 core drill holes. 

In 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler E&C Services, Inc., a Wood Group PLC company (“Wood”) undertook an analysis and re-modeling of the data utilized in the prior mineralized material estimate using updated geologic controls and a modeling method that optimizes grade. This resulted in an updated mineralized material estimate completed in February 2018.  The Wood estimate assumes mining would occur solely underground and would be optimized to maximize potential silver grades.  According to the Wood estimate, sulfide mineralized material in the Yaxtché zone, at a cut-off grade of 250 grams per tonne silver, and using a three-year average silver price of $16.62 per ounce, was 2.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 487 grams per tonne.

For further detail regarding mineralized material, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL”.

Exploration and Advancement of El Quevar

The Yaxtché deposit is the primary target currently identified at the El Quevar project. In September 2018, we completed the El Quevar PEA, which confirmed the potential for a profitable mining operation at Yaxtché with an estimated 5 million ounces annual silver production. The El Quevar PEA contemplates a six-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at a mine production rate of 1,200 tonnes per day using a post-pillar cut-and-fill mining method, delivering 2.45 million tonnes of diluted sulfide mineralized material at an average grade of 409 g/t  silver.  We have completed environmental baseline studies, and a further environmental impact assessment process would be required to support the permits necessary for construction and mining. If the El Quevar project proceeds to development and construction, we would be required to obtain numerous additional permits from national, provincial and municipal authorities in Argentina.

We spent approximately $1.3 million and $0.8 million at our El Quevar project on holding and maintenance costs in 2018 and 2017, respectively. The additional spending in 2018 was primarily related to the costs of preparing the technical reports and preparing for exploration drilling. From the inception of our exploration activities in 2004 through December 31, 2018 we have spent approximately $77.9 million on exploration and related activities at El Quevar, including amounts spent by our predecessor, Apex Silver Mines Limited. In 2019 we expect to spend approximately $1.3 million at our El Quevar project to fund ongoing exploration and evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs.

We have evaluated plans for further exploration drilling to increase the size of high grade silver resources near the Yaxtché deposit.  The Yaxtché deposit is open to the west and there are numerous drill intercepts with silver grades of economic interest in the nearby area that represent targets for further expansion.  During 2019, subject to the availability of sufficient funds, we plan to drill about fifteen core holes for a total of 3,000 meters to test extensions of mineralized material at Yaxtché, offsets to existing promising drill intercepts, and new drill targets based on reinterpreted IP (induced polarization) geophysics.

14


Table of Contents

Velardeña Properties

 

Location, Access and Facilities

 

The Velardeña Properties are comprised of two underground mines and two processing plants within the Velardeña mining district, which is located in the municipality of Cuencamé, in the northeast quadrant of the State of Durango, Mexico, approximately 65 kilometers southwest of the city of Torreón, Coahuila and approximately 140 kilometers northeast of the city of Durango, which is the capital of the State of Durango. The mines are reached by a seven kilometer road from the village of Velardeña which is reached by highway from Torreón and Durango. The Velardeña mining district is situated in a hot, semi-arid region.

 

Of the two underground mines comprising the Velardeña Properties, the Velardeña mine includes five different major vein systems including the Terneras, Roca Negra, San Mateo, Santa Juana and San Juanes systems. During 2015 we mined from the San Mateo, Terneras and Roca Negra vein systems as well as the Santa Juana vein system to augment grades as mining and processing rates ramped up.

 

We own a 300 tonne per day flotation sulfide mill situated near the town of Velardeña, which accounted for 100% of our revenue from saleable metals during 2015.a.  The mill includes lead, zinc and pyritethree flotation circuits in which we can process the sulfide material to make lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates.  Most of the silver and gold sold in 2015 was contained in the lead concentrate. During 2015 we processed all our mined material through the sulfide plant.

We also own a conventional 550 tonne per day cyanide leach oxide mill with a Merrill-Crowe precipitation circuit and flotation circuit located adjacent to our Chicago mine, which we previously used to process oxide and mixed sulfide/oxide material from the Velardeña Properties.mine.  In July 2015, we leased the oxide plant to a third partyHecla to process its

11


Table of Contents

own material through the plant for up to 42 months.plant.  See “-Velardeña Properties Activities” below.  The third party began processing material at the plant in lease with Hecla has since been extended through December 2015.  31, 2020.  We continue to evaluate and search for other oxide and sulfide feed sources, focusing on sources within haulage distance of our sulfide and oxide mills at the Velardeña Properties.

 

Prior to shutdown,shutting down production at the Velardeña mines in 2015, we trucked material from the Velardeña mines to the sulfide plant. In January 2012 we completed a tailings pond expansion at the sulfide plant, which is fully permitted and has capacity to treat tailings for approximately four additional years at the average processing rate of 285 tonnes per day.   At the oxide plant, we completed the first stage of a new tailings pond during May 2013. Additional tailings expansion workHecla is required to either leave unused at the oxide plant is planned for 2017 to accommodate tailings for the third party lessee, at the costend of the third party lessee.lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost.

 

Power for all of the mines and plants is provided through substations connected to the national grid. Water is provided for all of the mines by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently pumping from the three wells associated with the oxide plant which is more than sufficient for the third party lessee’sHecla’s processing operations.

 

15


Table of Contents

The following map shows the location of the Velardeña Properties (other than the El Mogote Fraccion concession, which is located southeastsouth of the identified properties).

 

Picture 3

 

12


Table of Contents

Property History

 

Exploration and mining in the Velardeña district extends back to at least the late 1500s or early 1600s, with large scale mining beginning in 1888 with the Velardeña Mining and Smelter Company. In 1902, the mining properties were acquired by ASARCO, who mined the property until 1926 when the mines were closed. For the next 35 years, the mines were operated from time to time by small companies and local miners. The property was nationalized in 1961, and in 1968 the sulfide processing plant was built by the Mexican government. In 1994, William Resources acquired the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties. In 1997, ECU Gold (the predecessor to ECU Silver Mining Inc.) purchased from William Resources the subsidiaries that owned the concessions and the oxide processing plant. The sulfide processing plant was acquired in 2004.

 

Title and Ownership Rights

 

We hold the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties through our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary Minera William S.A. de C.V. At present, a total of 30 mineral concessions comprise the Velardeña Properties. The Velardeña Properties encompass approximately 895 hectares. The mineral concessions vary in size, and the concessions comprising each mineral property are contiguous within each of the Velardeña and Chicago properties. We are required to

16


Table of Contents

pay annual concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to the Velardeña mining concessions. In 2016,2018, we made such payments totaling approximately $74,000$78,000 and expect to pay approximately $75,000$80,000 in 2017.2019.  We also own the surface rights to 144 hectares that contains the oxide plant, tailings area and access to the Chicago mine, along with surface lands that may be required for potential plant expansions.

 

The Velardeña Properties are subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities, or ejidos, surrounding our properties to obtain surface access rights needed in connection with our mining and exploration activities. We currently have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights for our Velardeña Properties with a total annual cost of approximately $25,000.$35,000. We have a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021, and a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties until 2038.

13


Table of Contents

The following Velardeña Properties exploitation concessions are identified below by name and number in the Federal government Public Registry of Mining.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17


Table of Contents

Mine/Area

    

Name of Exploitation
Concession

    

Concession
Number

 

Velardeña

 

AMPL. DEL ÁGUILA MEXICANA

 

85580

 

 

 

ÁGUILA MEXICANA

 

168290

 

 

 

LA CUBANA

 

168291

 

 

 

TORNASOL

 

168292

 

 

 

SAN MATEO NUEVO

 

171981

 

 

 

SAN MATEO

 

171982

 

 

 

RECUERDO

 

171983

 

 

 

SAN LUIS

 

171984

 

 

 

LA NUEVA ESPERANZA

 

171985

 

 

 

LA PEQUEÑA

 

171988

 

 

 

BUEN RETIRO

 

172014

 

 

 

UNIFICACIÓN SAN JUAN EVANGELISTA

 

172737

 

 

 

UNIFICACIÓN VIBORILLAS

 

185900

 

 

 

BUENAVENTURA No. 3

 

188507

 

 

 

EL PÁJARO AZÚL

 

188508

 

 

 

BUENAVENTURA 2

 

191305

 

 

 

BUENAVENTURA

 

192126

 

 

 

LOS DOS AMIGOS

 

193481

 

 

 

VIBORILLAS NO. 2

 

211544

 

 

 

KELLY

 

218681

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chicago

 

SANTA TERESA

 

171326

 

 

 

SAN JUAN

 

171332

 

 

 

LOS MUERTOS

 

171986

 

 

 

EL GAMBUSINO

 

171987

 

 

 

AMPLIACIÓN SAN JUAN

 

183883

 

 

 

MUÑEQUITA

 

196313

 

 

 

SAN AGUSTÍN

 

210764

 

 

 

EL PISTACHÓN

 

220407

 

 

 

LA CRUZ

 

189474

 

 

 

EL MOGOTE FRACCION I

 

221401

 

 

We hold water concessions in wells that provide water for the Velardeña Properties. In Mexico water concessions are granted by the National Commission of Water (“CNA”). Currently no new water concessions are being granted by the CNA; however, companies can acquire water concessions through purchase or lease from current concession holders. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are required to make annual payments to the CNA to maintain our rights to these wells.  In 20162018 we made such payments totaling approximately $25,000 and expect to pay approximately the same amount in 2017.2019. We are required to pay a fine to the CNA each year if we use

14


Table of Contents

too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. During 20162018 we did not incur any over usage or under usage fines.

 

18


Table of Contents

Geology and Mineralization

 

The Velardeña district is located at the easternmost limit of the Sierra Madre Occidental on the boundary between the Sierra Madre Oriental and the Mesa Central sub-provinces. Both of these terrains are underlain by Paleozoic and possibly Precambrian basement rocks.

 

The regional geology is characterized by a thick sequence of limestone and minor calcareous clastic sediments of Cretaceous age, intruded by Tertiary plutons of acidic to intermediate composition. During the Laramide Orogeny, the sediments were folded into symmetrical anticlines and synclines that were modified into a series of asymmetrical overturned folds by a later stage of compression.

 

A series of younger Tertiary stocks have intruded the older Cretaceous limestone over a distance of approximately 15 kilometers along a northeast to southwest trend. The various mineral deposits of the Velardeña mining district occur along the northeast southwest axis and are spatially associated with the intrusions and their related alteration.

 

An important northwest-southeast fracture system is associated with these intrusions and, in many cases, acts as the main focus of mineralization. The Velardeña Properties are underlain by a thick sequence of limestone that corresponds to rocks of the Aurora and Cuesta del Cura formations of Lower Cretaceous age.

 

Several types of Tertiary intrusive rocks are present in the Velardeña district. The largest of these rocks outcrops on the western flank of the Sierra San Lorenzo and underlies a portion of the Velardeña Properties. It is referred to as the Terneras pluton and forms a northeast oriented, slightly elongated body, considered to represent a diorite or monzodiorite that outcrops over a distance of about 2.5 kilometers. The adjacent limestone has been altered by contact metamorphism (exoskarn), and locally the intrusive has been metamorphosed (endoskarn).

 

The following is a description of the individual geological characteristics and mineralization found on each of the properties comprising the Velardeña and Chicago mines.

 

Velardeña Mine

 

The Santa Juana, Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo vein deposits on the Velardeña property are hosted by Aurora Formation limestone, the Terneras intrusion and related skarn. The limestone is intruded by a series of multiphase diorite or monzodiorite stocks (Terneras intrusion) and dikes of Tertiary age that outcrop over a strike length of approximately 2.5 kilometers.

 

Two main vein systems are present on the Velardeña property. The first is a northwest striking system as found in the Santa Juana deposit, while the second is east-west trending and is present in the Santa Juana, Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo deposits.

 

In the Santa Juana deposit, two main sets of vein trends are observed. The most significant is a steeply northeast dipping and northwest trending set that has acted as the main conduit for the mineralizing fluids in the Santa Juana deposit. This direction includes both linear and curved northwest vein sets.

trending.  The Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo veins all strike east-west and dip steeply north. The most extensive of these is the Terneras vein, which was mined in the past over a strike length of 1,100 meters. All of these veins are observed to have extensive strike lengths and vertical continuity for hundreds of meters. The mineralogy of the east west system is somewhat different in that it contains less arsenic than the northwest Santa Juana veins.

15


Table of Contents

Mineralization in the deposits located at the Velardeña mine belongs primarily to epithermal calcite quartz veins with associated lead, zinc, silver, gold and copper mineralization, typical of the polymetallic vein deposits of northern Mexico. The veins are usually thin, normally in the 0.2 meter to 0.5 meter range, but consistent along strike and down dip. Coxcomb and rhythmically banded textures are common.

 

19


Table of Contents

Chicago Mine

 

On the Chicago property, the oldest rocks outcropping are Cretaceous limestone of the Aurora Formation which are highly folded. This limestone is locally metamorphosed by the intrusion of the Tertiary dioritic stocks and dykes. The general geology of the Chicago property is very similar to the geology of the Velardeña property. The Chicago veins strike northeast and dip steeply southeast. Chicago ore tends to be higher in lead and zinc than the Santa Juana ore. Vein widths at Chicago are variable and tend to be narrower than at the Santa Juana deposit, especially in the skarn host.

 

2014 Technical Report

 

During the first quarter of 2015, the engineering firm of Tetra Tech, Inc. (“Tetra Tech”) completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties, set forth in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Silver

    

Gold

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

    

Silver

    

Gold

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

(Ag)

 

(Au)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Ag)

 

(Au)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grade

 

Grade

 

Lead

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grade

 

Grade

 

Lead

 

 

 

 

Tonnes

 

(Grams

 

(Grams

 

(Pb)

 

 

 

 

Tonnes

 

(Grams

 

(Grams

 

(Pb)

 

 

 

 

(in

 

per

 

per

 

Grade

 

Zinc (Zn)

 

 

(in

 

per

 

per

 

Grade

 

Zinc (Zn)

 

Mineralized Material

 

thousands)

 

tonne)

 

tonne)

 

%

 

Grade %

 

 

thousands)

 

tonne)

 

tonne)

 

%

 

Grade %

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

295

 

4.1

 

1.34

 

1.07

 

 

572

 

295

 

4.1

 

1.34

 

1.07

 

Sulfide

 

1,032

 

274

 

3.9

 

1.11

 

1.42

 

 

1,032

 

274

 

3.9

 

1.11

 

1.42

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

208

 

3.2

 

3.77

 

2.8

 

 

91

 

208

 

3.2

 

3.77

 

2.8

 

Sulfide

 

98

 

165

 

2.8

 

2.97

 

3.49

 

 

98

 

165

 

2.8

 

2.97

 

3.49

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

1,793

 

272

 

3.8

 

1.42

 

1.49

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2016

 

1,793

 

272

 

3.8

 

1.42

 

1.49

 


Note: Results may not tie precisely due to rounding.

 

The Tetra Tech mineralized material estimate assumed a silver price of $25 per troy ounce, a gold price of $1,446 per troy ounce, and a cutoff grade of a net smelter return (“NSR”) of $100 per tonne.

 

The following table shows the commodity prices and metallurgical recoveries used to determine the cutoff grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Sulfide

    

Oxide

    

Mixed

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metallurgical

 

Metallurgical

 

Metallurgical

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recovery

 

Recovery

 

Recovery

 

Metal

 

Metal Prices*

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

Silver

 

$

25 (oz)  

 

89

 

68

 

50

 

Gold

 

$

1,446 (oz)  

 

68

 

71

 

29

 

Lead

 

$

0.96 (lb)  

 

83

 

 —

 

25

 

Zinc

 

$

0.91 (lb)  

 

83

 

 —

 

37

 


* Amounts represent three-year average prices.

16


Table of Contents

The cutoff grade of $100 NSR per tonne of mineralized material was determined by adding the estimated average costs of mining ($53 per tonne), processing ($27 per tonne) and general and administration ($20 per tonne). The average cost estimates are the same for both the Velardeña and Chicago mines. The NSR value of mineralized material was determined for each type of mineralized material (sulfide, mixed, and oxide) by multiplying a fractional factor that

20


Table of Contents

represents an estimated combination of metallurgical recovery, treatment charges, penalties and payment terms by the unit value of each metal and then multiplying by the expected amount of that metal in each block of inventoried material.

 

The following table shows the reduction in mineralized material reported in the Tetra Tech report that resulted from extraction and processing of mineralized material in 2015. As a result of the shutdown of mining and processing in November 2015, there are no results for 2016.2016, 2017 or 2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

Silver

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

Silver

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

 

 

(Ag)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

 

 

(Ag)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Au)

 

 

 

Grade

 

Contained

 

Lead

 

Contained

 

 

 

Contained

 

 

 

 

(Au)

 

 

 

Grade

 

Contained

 

Lead

 

Contained

 

 

 

Contained

 

 

 

 

Grade

 

Contained

 

(Grams

 

Silver (Ag)

 

(Pb)

 

Lead (Pb)

 

Zinc

 

Zinc (Zn)

 

 

 

 

Grade

 

Contained

 

(Grams

 

Silver (Ag)

 

(Pb)

 

Lead (Pb)

 

Zinc

 

Zinc (Zn)

 

 

Tonnes

 

(Grams

 

Gold (Au)

 

per

 

oz.

 

Grade

 

lbs.

 

(Zn)

 

lbs.

 

 

Tonnes

 

(Grams

 

Gold (Au)

 

per

 

oz.

 

Grade

 

lbs.

 

(Zn)

 

lbs.

 

Mineralized Material

 

(in thousands)

 

per tonne)

 

oz.

 

tonne)

 

(in thousands)

 

%

 

(in thousands)

 

Grade %

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

per tonne)

 

oz.

 

tonne)

 

(in thousands)

 

%

 

(in thousands)

 

Grade %

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

4.1

 

74,780

 

295

 

5,425

 

1.34

 

16,898

 

1.07

 

13,493

 

 

572

 

4.1

 

74,780

 

295

 

5,425

 

1.34

 

16,898

 

1.07

 

13,493

 

Sulfide

 

1,032

 

3.9

 

127,741

 

274

 

9,101

 

1.11

 

25,254

 

1.42

 

32.307

 

 

1,032

 

3.9

 

127,741

 

274

 

9,101

 

1.11

 

25,254

 

1.42

 

32.307

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

3.2

 

9,362

 

208

 

609

 

3.77

 

7,563

 

2.8

 

5,617

 

 

91

 

3.2

 

9,362

 

208

 

609

 

3.77

 

7,563

 

2.8

 

5,617

 

Sulfide

 

98

 

2.8

 

8,822

 

165

 

520

 

2.97

 

6,417

 

3.49

 

7,540

 

 

98

 

2.8

 

8,822

 

165

 

520

 

2.97

 

6,417

 

3.49

 

7,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

1,793

 

3.8

 

220,406

 

272

 

15,655

 

1.42

 

56,132

 

1.49

 

58,958

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2017

 

1,793

 

3.8

 

220,406

 

272

 

15,655

 

1.42

 

56,132

 

1.49

 

58,958

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015 Extraction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018 Extraction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

Sulfide

 

76

 

2.6

 

6,371

 

156

 

383

 

0.8

 

1,343

 

1.09

 

1,839

 

 

76

 

2.6

 

6,371

 

156

 

383

 

0.8

 

1,343

 

1.09

 

1,839

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

Sulfide

 

5

 

1.9

 

310

 

117

 

19

 

2

 

220

 

2.82

 

311

 

 

 5

 

1.9

 

310

 

117

 

19

 

 2

 

220

 

2.82

 

311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Tonnes Extracted in 2015

 

81

 

2.6

 

6,681

 

154

 

401

 

0.87

 

1,564

 

1.2

 

2,150

 

Total Tonnes Extracted in 2018

 

81

 

2.6

 

6,681

 

154

 

401

 

0.87

 

1,564

 

1.2

 

2,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal loss adjustments during 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal loss adjustments during 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

Sulfide

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,063)

 

 —

 

(290)

 

 —

 

(522)

 

 —

 

(547)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,063)

 

 —

 

(290)

 

 —

 

(522)

 

 —

 

(547)

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

Sulfide

 

 —

 

 —

 

(140)

 

 —

 

(8)

 

 —

 

(107)

 

 —

 

(74)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(140)

 

 —

 

(8)

 

 —

 

(107)

 

 —

 

(74)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Tonnes Extracted in 2015

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,203)

 

 —

 

(297)

 

 —

 

(629)

 

 —

 

(621)

 

Total Tonnes Extracted in 2018

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,203)

 

 —

 

(297)

 

 —

 

(629)

 

 —

 

(621)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

4.1

 

74,780

 

295

 

5,425

 

1.34

 

16,898

 

1.07

 

13,493

 

 

572

 

4.1

 

74,780

 

295

 

5,425

 

1.34

 

16,898

 

1.07

 

13,493

 

Sulfide

 

956

 

3.9

 

118,308

 

274

 

8,429

 

1.11

 

23,389

 

1.42

 

29,921

 

 

956

 

3.9

 

118,308

 

274

 

8,429

 

1.11

 

23,389

 

1.42

 

29,921

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

3.2

 

9,362

 

208

 

609

 

3.77

 

7,563

 

2.8

 

5,617

 

 

91

 

3.2

 

9,362

 

208

 

609

 

3.77

 

7,563

 

2.8

 

5,617

 

Sulfide

 

93

 

2.8

 

8,372

 

165

 

493

 

2.97

 

6,089

 

3.49

 

7,155

 

 

93

 

2.8

 

8,372

 

165

 

493

 

2.97

 

6,089

 

3.49

 

7,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2015

 

1,712

 

3.8

 

210,522

 

272

 

14,956

 

1.43

 

53,940

 

1.49

 

56,187

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2018

 

1,712

 

3.8

 

210,522

 

272

 

14,956

 

1.43

 

53,940

 

1.49

 

56,187

 


Note: Results may not tie precisely due to rounding. Additionally, silver ounces, zinc pounds and leads pounds are rounded to the nearest thousand and gold ounces are rounded to the nearest ounce and tonnes. The variance in rounding different commodities and units is for convenience and does not reflect any differences in the level of accuracy of the calculated mineralized material estimate.

17


Table of Contents

For further detail regarding mineralized material, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL”.

 

21


Table of Contents

Velardeña Properties Activities

 

In 20162018 we incurred approximately $2.0$1.9 million in expenses related to shut down costs and maintenance at our Velardeña Properties as a result of the suspension of mining and processing activities in November 2015 and expect to incur approximately $0.4 million in quarterly holding costs for as long as mining and processing activities remain suspended.2015.  We retained a core group of employees, most assigned to operate the oxide plant that is leased to a third party and not affected by the shutdown. The retained employees also include an exploration group and an operations and administrative group to continue to advance our plans in Mexico, oversee corporate compliance activities, and to maintain and safeguard the longer term value of the Velardeña assets.

In July 2015 we entered into a leasing agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company to lease our Velardeña oxide plant for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. DuringThe lease agreement contained several lease extension options, and in the third quarter 2016, Hecla exercised its right to extend the initial 18-month term for six additional months untillease was extended through June 30, 2017, as permitted under the original lease agreement. As contemplated by the original agreement, the Company and Hecla also reached2017. The 2016 extension included an agreement regarding anunder which Hecla would construct, at its cost, certain tailings expansion of the tailings impoundment, at Hecla's cost,facilities to accommodate Hecla's increased use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount, while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The agreedtailings expansion is estimated to cost approximately $1.5 million, and we have obtained the necessary permits for such expansion.has since been completed. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed that Hecla hashad the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until December 31, 2018. On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease until December 31, 2018.

 

On August 2, 2017, we granted Hecla an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”).  In October 2018, Hecla exercised its option and extended the lease to December 31, 2020.  All of the fixed fees and throughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease.  Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease during the Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice.  Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for its our own purposes before December 31, 2020.

Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, Hecla processed approximately 136,000142,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $6.4$7.2 million, comprised of approximately $3.0$4.9 million for direct plant charges plusand fixed fees and approximately $2.3 million for other net reimbursable costs totaling approximately $3.4 million. We incurred costs of approximately $2.0 million related to the services we provide under the lease.  The $2.3 million of reimbursable costs are also reported as plant lease for acosts, resulting in net operating margin of $4.4approximately $4.9 million during 2016.for the year ended December 31, 2018. We expect Hecla reached itsto continue to process material near the intended processing throughput of approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2016 and, at this rate, net2019, which would generate cash payments to us, net of reimbursable costs, should totalof approximately $0.4$4.6 million per month, including variable and fixed fees, or nearly $5.0 million annually.during 2019. However, because Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on 120 days’ notice, there is no assurance that these amounts will be received.

 

Mining and Processing

 

ThereAside from some minor test mining and crushing activities, there were no mining or processing activities, other than the Hecla lease, at our Velardeña Properties in 20162017 or 2018 as a result of the shutdown of the mining and sulfide processing activities in November 2015. During 2015 the processing facilities generatedWe expect to incur approximately 465,000 payable silver equivalent ounces, including approximately 327,000 ounces of silver and 1,975 ounces of gold, and sold approximately 494,000 silver equivalent ounces.  Silver equivalent ounces include silver and gold but exclude lead and zinc and are calculated at a ratio of 70 silver ounces to 1 gold ounce. Also, during 2015 the processing facilities generated approximately 1.1$0.4 million pounds of payable lead and 1.2 million pounds of payable zinc. Full year 2015 cashin quarterly holding costs were $22.16 per payable silver ounce net of by-product credits.  “Cash costs per payable silver ounce, net of by-product credits” is a non-GAAP financial measure defined below in “Item 7 —Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.

The following table shows actual silver, gold and silver equivalent payables for 2015 until we suspended mining and sulfide processing in mid-November 2015. As a result of the shutdown ofas long as mining and processing in November 2015, there are no results for 2016.activities remain suspended.

18


Table of Contents

Payable Metal

2015

Silver (oz)

326,651

Gold (oz)

1,976

Silver equivalent (AgEq)(oz)(3)

464,971


Note: Equivalents calculated at 70:1 silver to gold.

19


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth the mining and processing statistics of our Velardeña Properties for 2015 until we suspended mining and sulfide processing in November 2015. As a result of the shutdown of mining and processing in November 2015, there are no results for 2016.

The Year Ended December 31,

2015

Tonnes Milled

(includes stockpiles)

Oxide plant

 —

Sulfide plant

80,736

80,736

Combined plant grades

(Grams per tonne)

Silver

160

Gold

2.63

Combined plant recovery (3)

Silver

78.7

%

Gold

28.9

%

Contained Metals (3)

(includes stockpiles)

Silver ounces

351,228

Gold ounces

2,270

Silver equivalent ounces (70:1)

510,128

Lead - pounds (000)

1,238

Zinc - pounds (000)

1,455

Payable Metals (3)

(includes stockpiles)

Silver ounces

326,651

Gold ounces

1,976

Silver equivalent ounces (70:1)

464,971

Lead - pounds (000)

1,107

Zinc - pounds (000)

1,216

Products sold

Doré - kilograms

 —

Precipitate - kilograms

45

Lead concentrates - tonnes

2,087

Zinc concentrates - tonnes

1,430

Pyrite concentrates - tonnes

633

Copper concentrates - tonnes

 —

Payable metals in products sold

Silver ounces

346,369

Gold ounces

2,114

Silver equivalent ounces (70:1)

494,349

Lead - pounds (000)

1,165

Zinc - pounds (000)

1,321


20


Table of Contents

Note:   Current payable metals and recoveries include final metal settlements pertaining to sales of previously reported payable metals.

The following table shows the recovery rates for silver, gold, lead and zinc at each of our processing facilities for 2015. As a result of the shutdown of mining and processing in November 2015, there are no results for 2016.

2015

Oxide plant recovery

Silver

—%

Gold

—%

Sulfide plant recovery

Silver

78.7%

Gold

28.9%

Lead

70.2%

Zinc

57.2%


 

Environmental Matters and Permitting

 

We hold environmental licenses and environmental impact assessments that allow us to run our mines, plants and tailing facilities at our Velardeña Properties. We are required to update our environmental licenses and environmental impact assessments for expansion of or modification to any of the existing two processing plants. The construction of new

22


Table of Contents

infrastructure beyond the current plant facilities also would require additional permitting, which could include environmental impact assessments and land use permits. We are currently finalizing obtaining all permits necessary for expansion of the tailings disposal facility at our oxide plant to accommodate additional capacity required for production by the plant lessee.

 

Certain Laws Affecting Mining in Mexico

 

Mexico, officially the United Mexican States, is a federal constitutional republic in North America and bordered by the United States of America, Belize and Guatemala. Mexico is a federal democratic republic with 31 states and one Federal District, which is Mexico City. Each state has its own constitution and its citizens elect a governor, as well as representatives, to their respective state congresses. The President of Mexico is the head of the executive federal government. Executive power is exercised by the President, while legislative power is vested in the two chambers of the Congress of the Union. The three constitutional powers are the Judiciary, the Executive and the Legislature which are independent of each other.

 

Legislation Affecting Mining

 

The Mining Law, originally published in 1992 and amended in 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2014, is the primary legislation governing mining activities in Mexico. Other significant legislation applicable to mining in Mexico includes the regulations to the Mining Law, the Federal Law of Waters, the Federal Labour Law, the Federal Law of Fire Arms and Explosives, the General Law on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection and regulations, the Federal Law of Duties and the Federal Law on Metrology and Standards.

 

The Concession System

 

Under Mexican law, mineral deposits are property of the Mexican republic, and a mining concession, granted by the executive branch of the federal government, is required for the exploration, exploitation and processing of mineral deposits. Mining concessions may only be granted to Mexican individuals domiciled in Mexico or companies incorporated and validly existing under the laws of Mexico. Mexican companies that have foreign shareholders must register with the

21


Table of Contents

National Registry of Foreign Investments and renew their registration on an annual basis. Mining concessions grant rights to explore and exploit mineral deposits but do not grant surface rights over the land where the concession is located. Mining concession holders are required to negotiate surface access with the land owner or holder (e.g., agrarian communities) or, should such negotiations prove unsuccessful, file an application with the corresponding administrative authority (Ministry of Economy or Ministry of Agrarian-Territorial-Urban Development) to obtain an easement, temporary occupancy, or expropriation of the land, as the case may be. An application for a concession must be filed with the Mining Agency or Mining Delegation located closest to the area to which the application relates.

 

Mining concessions have a term of 50 years from the date on which title is recorded in the Public Registry of Mining. Holders of mining concessions are required to comply with various obligations, including the payment of certain mining duties based on the number of hectares of the concession and the number of years the concession has been in effect. Failure to pay the mining duties can lead to cancellation of the relevant concession. Holders of mining concessions are also obliged to carry out and prove assessment works in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Mining Law and its regulations. The regulations to the Mining Law establish minimum amounts that must be spent or invested on mining activities. A report must be filed in May of each year regarding the assessment works carried out during the preceding year. The mining authorities may impose a fine on the mining concession holder if one or more proof of assessment work reports is not timely filed.

 

Pursuant to amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, effective January 2014, additional duties are imposed on mining concession holders; see “—Taxes in Mexico”.

 

Environmental Legislation

 

Mining projects in Mexico are subject to Mexican federal, state and municipal environmental laws and regulations for the protection of the environment. The principal legislation applicable to mining projects in Mexico is the federal

23


Table of Contents

General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection, which is enforced by the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection, commonly known as “PROFEPA”. PROFEPA is the federal entity in charge of carrying out environmental inspections and negotiating compliance agreements. Voluntary environmental audits, coordinated through PROFEPA, are encouraged under the federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection. PROFEPA monitors compliance with environmental legislation and enforces Mexican environmental laws, regulations and official standards. If warranted, PROFEPA may initiate administrative proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, which proceedings may result in the temporary or permanent closure of non-complying facilities, the revocation of operating licenses and/or other sanctions or fines. According to the Federal Criminal Code, PROFEPA must inform the relevant governmental authorities of any environmental crimes that are committed by a mining company in Mexico.

 

Concession holders under the exploration stage may submit themselves to comply with the Mexican Official Norm: NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997, which provides, among other things, that mining exploration activities to be carried out within certain areas must be conducted in accordance with the environmental standards set forth in NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997; otherwise, concession holders are required to file a preventive report or an environmental impact study prior to the commencement of the exploration, exploitation and processing of mineral resources. An environmental impact study is required for exploitation and processing of mineral resources activities.

 

In 2014 Mexico developed an Energy sectorenergy policy applicable to private investment companies whereby new mining concessions are now subject to prior approval from the Ministry of Energy. Current mining concessions forming the Velardeña Properties are not subject to or affected by this approval requirement, but any new mining concessions acquired will be subject to this additional approval.

 

22


Table of Contents

Taxes in Mexico

 

Mexico has a federal corporate income tax rate of 30%, and there are no state taxes on corporate net income. In determining their corporate income tax, entities are allowed to subtract from gross income various deductions permitted by law, and they are allowed a ten-year carry-forward of net operating losses. Pursuant to amendments to the federal tax laws effective January 1, 2014, a 10% withholding tax is charged on dividends distributed to shareholders, regardless of the tax residence of the recipient, out of after tax profits. However, in the case of nonresident shareholders the limitations and tax rates provided in the treaties to avoid double taxation will prevail. A foreign resident company is subject to income tax if it has a permanent establishment in Mexico. In general, a permanent establishment is a place of business where the activities of an enterprise are totally or partially carried out and includes, among others, offices, branches and mining sites.

 

Under the 2014 amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, titleholders of mining concessions are required to pay an annual special duty of 7.5% of their mining related profits. Titleholders of mining concessions also are required to pay a 0.5% special mining duty, or royalty, on an annual basis, on revenues obtained from the sale of silver, gold and platinum. Both the 7.5% annual special duty and the 0.5% duty are due at the end of March each year. The special duty of 7.5% is generally applicable to earnings before income tax, depreciation, depletion, amortization, and interest.  In calculating the special duty of 7.5%, there are no deductions related to depreciable costs from operational fixed assets, but exploration and prospecting depreciable costs are deductible when incurred.  Both duties are tax deductible for income tax purposes.

Mexico has several taxes in addition to income tax that are relevant to most business operations, including (i) the Value Added Tax (“VAT”); (ii) import duties; (iii) various payroll taxes; and (iv) statutorily entitled employee profit sharing (“PTU”); and (v) mining duties and royalties..  In addition, annual mining concession fees are charged by the government.

 

VAT in Mexico is charged upon alienation of goods, performance of independent services, grant of temporary use or exploitation of goods, or import of goods or services that occur within Mexico’s borders, at a rate of 16%. There is no VAT in the case of export of goods or services or for the sale of gold, jewelry, and gold metalwork with a minimum gold content of 80%, excluding retail sale to the general public. The sale of mining concessions is subject to VAT as

24


Table of Contents

concessions are not considered to be land. VAT paid by a business enterprise on its purchases and expenses may usually be credited against its liability for VAT collected from customers on its own sales.  In addition,This creditable VAT may also be directly refunded, or overpayments may be used tobut under new regulations beginning in January 2019, the creditable VAT can no longer offset tax liabilities arising from other Mexican federal taxes.

 

Import duties apply for goods and services entering the country, unless specifically exempted due to a free trade agreement or registered under specific programs like IMMEX, under which we are currently registered. Payroll taxes are payable in most states including Durango and Coahuila, and social security, housing and pension contributions must be made to the federal government when paying salaries.

 

Employees of Mexico entities are statutorily entitled to a portion of the employer’s pre-tax profits, called PTU. The rate of profit sharing is currently 10% of the employer’s taxable income as defined by the Income Tax law. A taxpayer may reduce its income tax base by an amount equal to the PTU. Certain companies are exempt from paying PTU, which include companies in the extractive industry (principally the mining industry) during the period of exploration.

 

Under the 2014 amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, titleholders of mining concessions are required to pay an annual special duty of 7.5% of their mining related profits, determined by deducting from mining related revenues certain specified types of cash expenditures. Payment of the special duty is due at the end of March each year.

Titleholders of mining concessions also are required to pay a 0.5% special mining duty, or royalty, on an annual basis, on revenues obtained from the sale of silver, gold and platinum. Similar to the 7.5% annual special duty, the 0.5% duty is due at the end of March each year.

El Quevar

Location and Access

Our El Quevar silver project is located in the San Antonio de los Cobres municipality, Salta Province, in the altiplano region of northwestern Argentina, approximately 300 kilometers by road northwest of the city of Salta, the capital city of the province. The project is also accessible by a 300 kilometer dirt and gravel road from the city of Calama in northern Chile. The small village of Pocitos, located about 20 kilometers to the west of El Quevar, is the nearest settlement. We have established a camp approximately 10 kilometers west of the project to house project workers. A high tension

23


Table of Contents

power line is located approximately 40 kilometers from the site, and a high pressure gas line devoted to the mining industry and subsidized by the Salta government is located within four kilometers of the El Quevar camp.

The El Quevar project is located near Nevado Peak with altitudes at the concessions ranging from 3,800 to 6,130 meters above sea level. The climate of the area is high mountain desert, with some precipitation in summer (such as snow) and little snow in winter.

The following map shows the location of the El Quevar project.

Property History

Mining activity in and around the El Quevar project dates back at least 80 years. Between 1930 and 1950, there was lead and silver extraction of mineralized materials from small workings in the area, but we have no mining records from that period. The first organized exploration activities on the property occurred during the 1970s, although no data from that period remains. Over the last 30 years, several companies have carried out exploration activity in the area, including BHP Billiton, Industrias Peñoles, Mansfield Minerals and Hochschild Mining Group, consisting primarily of local sampling with some limited drilling programs.

24


Table of Contents

Title and Ownership Rights

According to Argentine law, mineral resources are subject to regulation in the provinces where the resources are located. Each province has the authority to grant mining exploration permits and mining exploitation concession rights to applicants. The Federal Congress has enacted the National Mining Code and other substantive mining legislation, which is applicable throughout Argentina; however, each province has the authority to regulate the procedural aspects of the National Mining Code and to organize the enforcement authority within its own territory.

In the province of Salta, where the El Quevar project is located, all mining concessions are granted by a judge in the Salta Mining Court. The El Quevar project is comprised of exploitation concessions. Exploitation concessions are subject to a canon payment fee (maintenance fee) which is paid in advance twice a year (before June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year). Each time a new mining concession is granted, concession holders are exempt from the canon payment fee for a period of three years from the concession grant date. However, this exemption does not apply to the grant of vacant exploitation concessions; only to the grant of new mining concessions.

The El Quevar project is currently comprised of 31 mining concessions we hold directly. In total, the El Quevar project encompasses approximately 57,000 hectares. The area of most of our exploration activities at El Quevar is within the concessions that are owned by Silex Argentina S.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

We are required to pay a 1% net smelter return royalty on the value of all minerals extracted from the El Quevar II concession and a 1% net smelter return royalty on one-half of the minerals extracted from the Castor concession to the third party from whom we acquired these concessions.  We can purchase one half of the royalty for $1 million in the first two years of production.  The Yaxtché deposit is located primarily on the Castor concession. We are also required to pay a 3% royalty to the Salta Province based on the mine mouth value of minerals extracted from any of our concessions. To maintain all of the El Quevar concessions, we paid canon payment fees to the Argentine government of approximately $40,000 and $112,000 in 2015 and 2016, respectively. In 2017 we expect to pay approximately $115,000.

25


Table of Contents

The following El Quevar mine concessions are identified below by name and file number in the Salta Province Registry of Mines.

Name of Mine Concession

Concession
File Number

Quevar II

17114

Quirincolo I

18036

Quirincolo II

18037

Castor

3902

Vince

1578

Armonia

1542

Quespejahuar

12222

Toro I

18332

Quevar Primera

19534

Quevar Novena

20215

Quevar Decimo Tercera

20501

Quevar Tercera

19557

Quevar Vigesimo Tercero

21043

Quevar 10

20219

Quevar Vigesimo Primera

20997

Quevar Vigesimo Septima

22403

Quevar IV

19558

Quevar Vigesimo Cuarto

21044

Quevar 11

20240

Quevar Quinta

19617

Quevar 12

20360

Quevar Decima Quinta

20445

Quevar Sexta

19992

Quevar 19

20706

Quevar Vigesimo Sexta

22087

Quevar Vigesimo Segundo

21042

Quevar Séptima

20319

Quevar Veinteava

20988

MARIANA CANTERA

15190

Arjona

18080

Quevar Vigesimo Quinto

21054

The surface rights at El Quevar are controlled by the Salta Province. There are no private properties within the concession area. To date, no issues involving surface rights have impacted the project. Although we have unrestricted access to our facilities, we have been granted easements to further protect our access rights.

Geology and Mineralization

The geology of the El Quevar project is characterized by silver-rich veins and disseminations in Tertiary volcanic rocks that are part of an eroded stratovolcano. Silver mineralization at El Quevar is hosted within a broad, generally east-west-trending structural zone and occurs as a series of north-dipping parallel sheeted vein zones, breccias and mineralized

26


Table of Contents

faults situated within an envelope of pervasively silicified brecciated volcanic rocks. There are at least three sub-parallel structures that extend for an aggregate length of approximately 6.5 kilometers. Several volcanic domes (small intrusive bodies) have been identified and mineralization is also found in breccias associated with these domes, especially where they are intersected by the structures. The silver mineralization at the Yaxtché zone is of epithermal origin. The cross-cutting nature of the mineralization, the assemblage of sulfide and alteration minerals, and the presence of open spaces with euhedral minerals, all point to an origin at shallow to moderate depths (a few hundred meters below surface) from hydrothermal solutions.

2012 Technical Report

During 2012 RungePincockMinarco (“RPM”) completed an updated estimate of mineralized material at our El Quevar project. This SEC Industry Guide 7 estimate assumed mining of oxide material from an open pit on the east end of the Yaxtché deposit and sulfide material from both the open pit and an underground mine on the western portion of the Yaxtché deposit. According to the RPM estimate, based on results from 270 core drill holes, mineralized material in the Yaxtché zone, at a cut-off grade of 26 grams per tonne silver for the open pit and 100 grams per tonne silver for underground material, and using a three-year average silver price of $24.41 per ounce, was as follows:

 

 

 

 

Tonnes

    

Average silver

 

(000s)

 

grade (grams/tonne)

 

6,024

 

147.5

 

The RPM estimate includes a smaller tonnage of mineralized material in the possible open pit at a higher likely grade as compared to the technical report prepared by RPM pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (“43-101”). In the RPM report pursuant to 43-101, RPM used inferred resources beneficially to the possible operation in the optimization of a resource level open pit. When preparing its mineralized material estimate under Industry Guide 7, RPM did not use the inferred resources calculated pursuant to 43-101 to beneficially optimize the pit. As such, optimization without the benefit of inferred material yielded a smaller tonnage of mineralized material in the possible open pit at a higher likely grade as compared to the RPM report pursuant to 43-101.

For further detail regarding mineralized material, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL”.

Exploration and Advancement of El Quevar

The Yaxtché deposit is the primary target currently identified at the El Quevar project. We believe that the El Quevar deposit may be amenable to bulk mining, which could include an open pit on the eastern and central areas of the Yaxtché deposit and bulk underground mining in the western area. Our work indicates that the Yaxtché deposit is at least 2 kilometers in strike length and is continuous laterally and to depths of more than 300 meters below surface in the main area. More recent results also support a possible eastward extension of the Yaxtché deposit and recognize an emerging new mineralized trend five kilometers north of the Yaxtché deposit. We continue to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance until we can fund further exploration ourselves or find a partner to fund further exploration. We have completed environmental baseline studies, and a further environmental impact assessment process would be required to support the permits necessary for construction and mining. If the El Quevar project proceeds to development and construction, we would be required to obtain numerous additional permits from national, provincial and municipal authorities in Argentina.

We spent approximately $1.1 million and $0.5 million at our El Quevar project on holding and maintenance costs in 2015 and 2016, respectively. From the inception of our exploration activities in 2004 through December 31, 2016 we have spent approximately $75.8 million on exploration and related activities at El Quevar. In 2017 we expect to spend approximately $0.5 million at our El Quevar project on maintenance and holding costs.

27


Table of Contents

Exploration Properties

 

In addition to El Quevar, we currently control a portfolio of approximately 1012 exploration properties located primarily in certain traditional precious metals producing regions of Mexico. We do not consider any of our exploration properties to be individually material, including those noted below.

 

In 20172019 we plan to focus our exploration efforts primarily on the Santa Maria mine locatedexploration and evaluation activities at El Quevar, Yoquivo, Navegantes and other properties, primarily in the Parral District in Chihuahua State and the Rodeo property located west of the Velardeña Properties in Durango.North America. During 20172019 we expect our expenditures for the exploration program to total approximately $1.8$2.0 million, with approximately $0.3 million in property holding costs in Mexico and approximately $0.5 million in administrative and general reconnaissance costs in Mexico.

 

Santa Maria

Santa Maria

In August 2014, we entered into an option agreement giving us the right to acquire for $1.2 million the Santa Maria mine, a privately held property comprised of a single mining claim of 18 hectares west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua State, Mexico. During the first two quarters of 2016Since 2015, we mined approximately 4,500 tonnes of material as a bulk sample with gradeshave completed test mining and processing of approximately 235 gpt silver and 0.7 gpt gold. This material was substantially lower in grade than material mined in 20157,100 dry tonnes from the same vein. We processed the bulk sample through a toll milling facility, generating approximately 100 tonnesSanta Maria mine, with average grades of concentrates containing approximately 22,000 ounces of silver and 44 ounces of gold.  The concentrates were sold to a third party for approximately $300,000 during the first two quarters of 2016 consisting of approximately 21,000 payable ounces of silver and 40 payable ounces of gold, which offset exploration costs. The average grade of 7,500 tons mined and processed in bulk samples since 2015 is 338 gpt silver and 0.70.8 gpt gold.

In March 2017, a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) was completed on our behalf by the engineering firm Tetra Tech, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on an updated estimate of mineralized material.  The PEA presented a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit.  In September 2018, Tetra Tech completed a second PEA for the Santa Maria project that incorporates data accumulated since March 2017, including an additional 77 hectares of mineral tenure acquired in August 2017 that covers the on-strike and downdip extensions of the Santa Maria vein systems. The new PEA also incorporates information from a 22-hole, 4,800-meter drilling program begun in August 2017 and completed in April 2018.  Including the latest drill program, we have drilled 9,900 meters in 59 holes since acquiring the property.  Surface mapping and sampling has also identified additional high-grade veins on the adjacent eastern extension of the Santa Maria property and new veins to the north located outside of the mineralized material area as defined in the March 2017 PEA.

The option agreement requiresSeptember 2018 PEA shows improvement in projected cash flow, metal production and profitability compared to the previous study. The PEA estimates a 4.2-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at an additional approximately $0.9 millionaverage mine production rate of 218 tonnes per day, using a combination of cut-and-fill and sublevel stoping. It is currently envisioned that both mixed and sulfide materials will undergo toll-milling at a local third-party facility with sulfide flotation circuits. Oxide material will be cyanide leached at the same toll-milling facility. In the PEA, Santa Maria is estimated to be paiddeliver 150,000 tonnes of diluted sulfide material to the mill at an average grade of 378 g/t silver equivalent (“AgEq”, calculated by combining Ag and Au values where one g/t of Au equals 74 g/t of Ag),

25


Table of Contents

116,000 tonnes of diluted oxide material at an average grade of 428 g/t AgEq and 42,000 tonnes of diluted mixed material at an average grade of 278 g/t tonne AgEq. 

We have the right to acquire 100% of the Santa Maria property.  Minimumproperty under two separate option agreements representing the total concessions that comprise the property for additional payments of $0.1$1.0 million, are due every six monthspayable through April 2022. The first option agreement, covering concessions we acquired in April and October andAugust 2014, requires an additional approximately $0.4 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by continuing to make minimum payments for 2017 have already been paid to the property owner.  Untilof $0.2 million in 2019 and, $0.2 million in 2020.  In addition, until the total due under the first option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to 50% of any net profits from mining activities atfrom the property,concessions related to the option, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by the Companyus since April 2015, to the extent that such net profit payments exceed the minimum payments.  The second option agreement, covering concessions acquired in August 2017, requires an additional $0.6 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by making additional payments of $0.2 million in each of the years 2019 through 2021.

 

In February 2017 a PEA was completed on our behalf by Tetra Tech based on an updated estimate of mineralized material. The PEA presents a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit.  The PEA contemplates a 38-month underground mining operation at a mining rate of 200 tonnes per day using a combination of cut and fill and other mining techniques, and custom milling at a local third-party flotation mill.  Based on the assumptions in the PEA, we believe there may be potential to develop a small mining operation at Santa Maria.

In 2017 we plan to continue work related to optimizing mining plans for the project and obtaining permits for the potential mining operation as considered in the current PEA.  Permit applications have been submitted and are pending comment and acceptance.  We are also developing plans for additional exploration work to potentially expand the deposit.  However, no development decision has been made with respect to the project.

Rodeo

Rodeo

We acquired the Rodeo and Rodeo 2 claims comprising 1,866 hectares 80 kilometers west of the Velardeña Properties in Durango, Mexico where previous exploration by other companies has identified a gold-bearing epithermal system exposed at the surface. In JuneDuring 2016, we begancompleted a 2,080 meter core drilling program at the Rodeo property at a cost of approximately $0.4 million. The results from the program show a gold and silver bearing epithermal vein and breccia system with encouraging gold and silver values over an approximate 50 to 70 meter true width.  The system is exposed at the top of a northwesterly striking ridge and dips steeply to the northeast over about one kilometer of strike length.

28


Table of Contents

During January 2017, Tetra Tech completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Rodeo deposit, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on two different operating scenarios.  The first operating scenario reflects a smaller amount of higher grade material and estimated mineralized material of 0.4 million tonnes containing 3.3 gpt gold and 11 gpt silver. We believe this material, as currently identified, could provide additional mined material for our Velardeña oxide mill following the completion of the Hecla lease, currently set to expire no later than December 31, 2018. This scenario provides a potentially shorter time to processing with lower capital costs since we already own the mill, located within trucking distance of the Rodeo property.  The second operating scenario reflects a larger amount of lower grade material and estimated mineralized material of 3.6 million tonnes containing 0.8 gpt gold and 12 gpt silver.  The second mineralized material estimate envisions a standalone heap leach operation, depending on leachability of the material and development and operating costs.We believe this material, as currently identified, could provide additional mined material for ourVelardeña oxide mill following the completion of the Hecla lease, currently set to expire December 31, 2020.

In initial test work conducted in 2017, we received confirmation of good gold and silver metallurgical recoveries for milled material in initial test work. Bottle roll cyanide leach testing of the high-grade samples resulted in gold extractions of 80 to 86 percent. Silver extractions ranged from 72 to 76 percent for all tests. Test work also indicates that the material is not suitable for gold and silver recovery by heap leaching. 

Due to the extension of the lease period for the oxide mill, plans to advance the Rodeo project have been delayed until early 2020.

Yoquivo

 

In October 2017 we planacquired the right to continue work related to metallurgical studies, economic evaluationpurchase claims covering the Yoquivo District, Ocampo Municipality, Chihuahua, Mexico through an option agreement.  The Yoquivo District is a past producing, bonanza grade epithermal vein gold and potential resource expansion.

Celaya Farm-out

In August 2016, our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Global Holdings, L.P., a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to our Celaya exploration property in Mexico. We received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum has agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million within the first yearsilver district located 35 kilometers southeast of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program.  Electrum, at its option, can elect to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project after incurring exploration expenditures totaling $2.5 million during the first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as manager of the joint venture. If we elect not to contribute to additional exploration or development expenditures after the initial earn-in period, Electrum, at its option, wouldOcampo Mining District.  We have the right to earn an additional 20% interestpurchase six claims totaling 1,906 hectares for payment of $0.5 million over four years plus outstanding claim taxes totaling approximately $0.1 million.  No cash payments to the owner are due until the second anniversary of the agreement.  The owner retains a 2% net smelter return royalty capped at $2.0 million.

26


Table of Contents

In October 2018 we announced high-grade silver-gold assays from the Yoquivo project. Multiple silver-gold bearing epithermal veins were mapped and sampled, with the two most important veins being the San Francisco and Pertenencia veins. A new vein, the La Nina vein, was discovered in the Celaya project,northwest of the property where it splits off from the main San Francisco vein. We are focusing exploration efforts on the Pertenencia vein, which appears to be more silver-rich compared to the San Francisco vein. Sampling of the Pertenencia vein is still in progress as is surface work in preparation for identifying the best drill targets. We expect to begin a total interestdrill program in 2019 to test the most promising portions of 80%, by incurring an additional $2.5 million of exploration or development expenditures over a second three-year period. Following the second earn-in period we would have the right to maintain our 20% interest or our interest ultimately could be converted into a 10% net profits interest.veins.  A permit for drilling has been obtained.

 

The 6,200-hectareNavegantes

In November 2018, we acquired the Navegantes project in southern Chihuahua state, Mexico. Recent surface and underground sampling have returned high-grade silver and gold Celaya project containsvalues from a strongly developed alteration systemseries of epithermal silver-base metal veins outcropping on the main Mexico silver belt trend,property. The project consists of six concessions totaling 521 hectares and is located 10 kilometers east of Plata Latina’s Naranjillo silver and gold discovery and 45 kilometers southeast of and on trend with the historic Guanajuato District. We have conducted mapping and sampling activities at Celaya since 2012.  We completed a 2,000 meter, three-hole drilling program in 2015 that identified epithermal gold and silver mineralization beneath a portionapproximately 60km northwest of the widespread clay-silica alteration on the claims comprising the project.

Electrum Global Holdings’ Mexican subsidiary, Minera Adularia, has conducted extensive geologic mapping and sampling on the Celaya property.  New targets have been identified and exploration drilling to test these targets began in January 2017.San Francisco del Oro-Santa Barbara District where our Santa Maria project is located.

 

Farm-outs, Royalties and Other Dispositions

 

Exploration properties that we choose not to advance are evaluated for joint venture, sale of all or a partial interest and royalty potential. We currently have minority ownership interests and/or royalties in or have disposed of the following properties that were once part of our exploration portfolio:

·

Zacatecas. CelayaOn April 28, 2016,.  In 2018 we entered into an option agreement under which Santa Cruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santa Cruz”) may acquiresold our interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims locatedremaining interests in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas,Celaya exploration property in Mexico (the “Zacatecas Properties”)to a subsidiary of Electrum Group LLC in exchange for a series of payments totaling $1.5$4.0 million.  Santa Cruz paid the Company $0.2 million on signing the agreement and an additional $0.2 million in October 2016. In order to maintain its option and acquire the Zacatecas Properties, Santa Cruz is required to pay additional amounts of $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million due 12, 18 and 24 months after

29


Table of Contents

signing, respectively.  Santa Cruz has the right to terminate the option agreement at any time, and the agreement will terminate if Santa Cruz fails to make a payment when due.

·

San Luis del Cordero. We commenced a $0.6 million exploration drilling program in the first quarter 2016 at the Santa Rosa vein in the San Luis del Cordero project in Durango State, Mexico.  The 20 hole, 4,600 meter drilling program was completed in June 2016, and we received drill results from that program in July.  Based on our evaluation of those July results, we concluded that further work on this project was not likely to meet our near-term objectives and we terminated the farm-in arrangement for the property in August 2016.

 

·

San Diego Exploration Property.Zacatecas On August 2,.  In April 2016, we soldentered into an option agreement, which was later amended in February 2018, under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) has acquired our remaining 50% interest in the San Diego property in MexicoZacatecas Properties for a series of payments totaling approximately $1.5 million.  Payments of $249,000, $225,000 and $212,000 were paid to Golden Tag Resources, Ltd (“Golden Tag”), which heldus during the other 50% interest in the property, for approximately $379,000 in cashfirst, second and 2,500,000 common sharesthird quarters of Golden Tag. Pursuant to the sales agreement, Golden Tag will be required to pay us a 2.0% net smelter return royalty in respect to the San Diego property. We now hold 7,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag, representing approximately 10% of its outstanding common shares.

·

Sale of Mining Equipment. On August 8, 2016, we sold certain mining equipment to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of2018, respectively.  The Sentient Group (Sentient”), a related party, for $687,000. The equipment sold was excess equipment held at our Velardeña Properties that we did not expect to use. We received $69,000 or 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale, with the remaining $618,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10% to be due in February 2017. We expect to amend the original equipment sale in February 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000.   Upon execution of the amendment we expect to receive an additionalfinal payment of $100,000, and the remaining principal and interest balance as of February 2017 of $737,000, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, would be due$13,000 was received by us in August 2017. October 2018.

 

·

Zacatecas Royalty (Mexico)With respect to certain concessions in a portion of our Zacatecas project in Mexico sold to a subsidiary of Capstone Mining Corp. in 2009, we are entitled to a net smelter return of 1.5% on the first one million tonnes of production, and a 3% net smelter return on production in excess of one million tonnes.  The net smelter return on production in excess of one million tonnes escalates by 0.5% for each $0.50 increment in copper price above $3.00 per pound of copper. There is currently no production on these concessions.

·

Fortuna Royalty (Peru). We are entitled to a net smelter return of 2.5% from a mining claim in Peru we sold to Compañia Minera Fortuna in August 2012. There is currently no production related to this claimclaim..

 

Executive Officers of Golden Minerals

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

    

Age

    

Position

Warren M. Rehn

 

6264

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

Robert P. Vogels

 

5961

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Warren M. Rehn.  Mr. Rehn was appointed President of our company in May 2015 and appointed Chief Executive Officer and director in September 2015. Mr. Rehn previously served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist since December 2012 and served as Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist since February 2012. From 2006

27


Table of Contents

2007 until February 2012, Mr. Rehn held various positions at Barrick Gold Exploration, Inc., serving most recently as Chief Exploration Geologist for the Bald Mountain and Ruby Hill mining units. From 2005 until 2007, Mr. Rehn was a consulting geologist for Gerson Lehman Group, which provides consulting services to various industries, including geology and mining. Mr. Rehn served as a Consulting Senior Geologist at Placer Dome Exploration, Inc. in 2004 and as

30


Table of Contents

an independent consulting geologist throughout the Americas from 1994 until 2003. He served as a Senior Geologist at Noranda Exploration, Inc. from 1988 until 1994. Mr. Rehn holds an M.S. in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. in Geological Engineering from the University of Idaho.

 

Robert P. Vogels.  Mr. Vogels was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2009. Mr. Vogels served as Controller of Apex Silver from January 2005 to March 2009 and was named Vice President in January 2006. Prior to joining Apex Silver, Mr. Vogels served as corporate controller for Meridian Gold Company from January 2004 until December 2004. He served as the controller of INCO Limited’s Goro project in New Caledonia from October 2002 to January 2004. Prior to joining INCO, Mr. Vogels worked from 1985 through October 2002 for Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, which was acquired in 1999 by Phelps Dodge Corp. During that time, he served in several capacities, including as the controller for its El Abra copper mine in Chile from 1997 until March 2002. Mr. Vogels began his career in public accounting as a CPA. He holds a B.Sc. in accounting and an MBA degree from Colorado State University.

 

Board of Directors of Golden Minerals

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Occupation

Jeffrey G. Clevenger (2)

 

6769

 

Chairman

Warren M. Rehn

 

6264

 

President and Chief Executive Officer, Company

W. Durand Eppler (1),(3)

 

6365

 

Managing Director, Capstone Headwaters MB

Ian Masterton-Hume (2)

66

Corporate Director and Member, Sentient Business Council

Kevin R. Morano (2),(3)

 

6365

 

Managing Principal, KEM Capital LLC

Terry M. Palmer (1),(3)

 

7274

 

Retired Certified Public Accountant

Andrew N. Pullar

 

4546

 

Chief Executive OfficerManaging Partner and Director, The Sentient GroupEquity Partners

David H. Watkins (1),(2)

 

7274

 

Director, Commander Resources Ltd., Euro Resources S.A.

 


Committee Membership

(1)

Audit

(2)

Compensation

(3)

Corporate Governance and Nominating

 

Metals Market Overview

 

We are an emerging precious metals exploration company with silver and gold mining properties in Mexico and a large silver advanced exploration silver project in Argentina. Descriptions of the markets for these metals are provided below.

 

Silver Market

 

Silver has traditionally served as a medium of exchange, much like gold. Silver’s strength, malleability, ductility, thermal and electrical conductivity, sensitivity to light and ability to endure extreme changes in temperature combine to make it a widely used industrial metal. While silver continues to be used as a form of investment and a financial asset, the principal uses of silver are industrial, primarily in electrical and electronic components, photography, jewelry, silverware, batteries, computer chips, electrical contacts, and high technology printing. Silver’s anti-bacterial properties also make it valuable for use in medicine and in water purification. Additionally, the use of silver in the photovoltaic and solar panel industries is growing rapidly, and new uses of silver are being developed in connection with the use of superconductive wire and radio frequency identification devices.

3128


 

Table of Contents

Most silver product is obtained from mining in which silver is not the principal or primary product. The Silver Institute, an international silver industry association, noted that for 2014 only around 31% of output came from so-called primary silver mines, where silver is the main source of revenue.

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated on the London Fix high and low silver fixes in U.S. dollars per troy ounce. On February 24, 2017,26, 2019, the closing price of silver was $18.27$15.83 per troy ounce.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

Year

    

High

    

Low

 

2011

 

$

48.70

 

$

26.16

 

2012

 

$

37.23

 

$

26.67

 

2013

 

$

32.23

 

$

18.61

 

2014

 

$

22.05

 

$

15.28

 

2015

 

$

18.23

 

$

13.71

 

2016

 

$

20.71

 

$

13.58

 

2017

 

$

18.56

 

$

15.22

 

2018

 

$

17.52

 

$

14.13

 

2019*

 

$

16.08

 

$

15.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

Year

    

High

    

Low

 

2010

 

$

30.70

 

$

15.14

 

2011

 

$

48.70

 

$

26.16

 

2012

 

$

37.23

 

$

26.67

 

2013

 

$

32.23

 

$

18.61

 

2014

 

$

22.05

 

$

15.28

 

2015

 

$

18.23

 

$

13.71

 

2016

 

$

20.71

 

$

13.58

 

2017*

 

$

18.27

 

$

15.95

 


*Through February 24, 2017.26, 2019.

 

Gold Market

 

Gold has two main categories of use: fabrication and investment. Fabricated gold has a variety of end uses, including jewelry, electronics, dentistry, industrial and decorative uses, medals, medallions and official coins. Gold investors buy gold bullion, official coins and jewelry. The supply of gold consists of a combination of production from mining and the draw-down of existing stocks of gold held by governments, financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals.

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated on the London Fix PM high and low gold fixes in U.S. dollars per troy ounce. On February 24, 2017,26, 2019, the closing price of gold was $1,254$1,325 per troy ounce.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

Year

    

High

    

Low

 

2011

 

$

1,895

 

$

1,319

 

2012

 

$

1,792

 

$

1,540

 

2013

 

$

1,694

 

$

1,192

 

2014

 

$

1,385

 

$

1,142

 

2015

 

$

1,296

 

$

1,049

 

2016

 

$

1,366

 

$

1,077

 

2017

 

$

1,346

 

$

1,151

 

2018

 

$

1,355

 

$

1,178

 

2019*

 

$

1,344

 

$

1,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

Year

    

High

    

Low

 

2010

 

$

1,420

 

$

1,058

 

2011

 

$

1,895

 

$

1,319

 

2012

 

$

1,792

 

$

1,540

 

2013

 

$

1,694

 

$

1,192

 

2014

 

$

1,385

 

$

1,142

 

2015

 

$

1,296

 

$

1,049

 

2016

 

$

1,366

 

$

1,077

 

2017*

 

$

1,254

 

$

1,146

 


*     Through February 24, 2017.26, 2019.

 

29


Table of Contents

Employees

 

We currently have approximately 160178 employees, including sixseven in Golden, approximately 130164 in Torreón, Mexico or at the Velardeña Properties (including approximately 7090 assigned to the oxide plant which is leased to a third party), threesix in Argentina in connection with the El Quevar project, and approximately 21one in various foreign exploration offices.Peru.

 

32


Table of Contents

Competition

 

There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the acquisition of a limited number of mineral resource opportunities, and many of the mining companies with which we compete have greater financial and technical resources than we do. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on acquisitions of mineral properties of merit, as well as on exploration and advancement of their mineral properties. We also compete with other mining companies for the acquisition and retention of skilled mining engineers, mine and processing plant operators and mechanics, geologists, geophysicists and other experienced technical personnel. Our competitive position depends upon our ability to successfully and economically advance new and existing silver and gold properties. Failure to achieve and maintain a competitive position could adversely impact our ability to obtain the financing necessary for us to advance our mineral properties.

 

Available Information

 

We make available, free of charge through our website at www.goldenminerals.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website is not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K and is not a part of this report.  Additionally, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

 

ITEM 1A:RISK FACTORS

Investors in Golden Minerals should consider carefully, in addition to the other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors:

We have historically incurred operating losses and operating cash flow deficits and we expect to incur operating losses and operating cash flow deficits through 2017;2019; our potential profitability in the foreseeable future would depend on our ability to identify, acquire and mine properties to generate sufficient revenues to fund our continuing activities.

       We have a history of operating losses and we expect that we will continue to incur operating losses unless and until such time as our Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project, or another of our exploration properties, which may include the Santa Maria Mine or the Rodeo property, generates sufficient revenue to fund our continuing business activities. Although we have leased the oxide plant at the Velardeña Properties to a subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company, the cash that we expect will be generated from that lease will not be insufficientsufficient to fund all of our continuing business activities as currently conducted. In addition, the oxide plant lease may terminate sooner or produce less revenue than we anticipate. There is no assurance that we will develop additional sources of revenue.

        In addition, the potential profitability of mining and processing at any of our properties would be based on a number of assumptions. For example, profitability would depend on metal prices, costs of materials and supplies, costs at the mines and processing plants and the amounts and timing of expenditures, including expenditures to maintain our

30


Table of Contents

Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project and to continue exploration at other exploration properties, and potential strategic acquisitions or other transactions, in addition to other factors, many of which are and will be beyond our control. We cannot be certain we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from any source to achieve profitability and eliminate operating cash flow deficits, or to cease to require additional funding.

33


Table of Contents

We maywill require additional external financing to fund our continuing business activities in the future.

As of December 31, 2016,2018 we had approximately $2.6$3.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. With anticipated costs during 2017,2019, including costs related to shut down andexploration expenditures, care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties, exploration and evaluation expenditures and property holding costs at the El Quevar project, and general and administrative expenses, offset by anticipated revenue from the lease of the oxide plant and the sale of non-strategic exploration properties,$4.6 million, we expect our current cash and cash equivalent balance towill be depleted to approximately $1.5 millionzero by the end of 2017.2019, unless we are successful in raising additional capital or selling certain exploration assets. Even with thethese anticipated revenue from the Velardeña oxide lease and potential sale of non-strategic exploration propertiesrevenues throughout 2017,2019, our cash balance in 2017 might2019 will not be sufficient to provide adequate cash reserves in the event of an unexpected termination of the Hecla lease, variations from anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties and costs for continued exploration, project assessment and development at our other exploration properties, including Santa Maria and Rodeo, requiring us to seek additional funding from equity or debt or from monetization of non-core assets.

        Other than our ATM Program (discussed in more detail below) for which the amount of funds raised thereby is uncertain, weWe do not have a credit, off-take or other commercial financing arrangement in place that would finance our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future, and we believe that securing credit for these purposes may be difficult given our limited history and the continuing volatility in global credit and commodity markets. In addition, commercial financing arrangements may not be available on favorable terms or on terms that would not further restrict our flexibility and ongoing ability to meet our cash requirements over a reasonable period of time. Access to public financing has been negatively impacted by the volatility in the credit markets and metals prices, which may affect our ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, to do so on favorable terms. We also may not be able to obtain funding by monetizing additional non-core exploration or other assets at an acceptable price. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing to fund our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future on favorable terms or at all.

Although we may be able to access public equity markets, including through issuances under our At-the-Market program we entered into in December 2016 (the “ATM Program”) or the committed equity program with Lincoln Park Capital that we entered into in May 2018 (the “LPC Program”), significant issuances under those programs may be heavily dilutive to existing shareholders. 

Hecla may terminate the oxide plant lease.

In July 2015 we entered into a leasing agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company to lease our Velardeña oxide plant for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. During the third quarter 2016The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, which Hecla exercised, its right to extendextending the initial 18-monthcurrent lease for six additional months until June 30, 2017 and has the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until term through December 31, 2018.2020. Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant and during the year ended December 31, 2016, Hecla’s2018, Hecla's mining and processing activities resulted in a net margin of $4.4$4.9 million for the Company.  Although we intend the oxide plant lease to extend through December 2018, theus.  The lease may terminate sooner than we anticipatethe end of 2020 if Hecla experiences mining problems or delays at its nearby mine, if there are disputes between Hecla and us, or for other reasons. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on 120 days’ notice. Moreover, the lease payment from Hecla is based, in part, on the amount of ore processed at the plant, and we have no control over their production.  There is also no assurance that Hecla will exercise its right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months through December 31, 2018.

The issuance of a significant number of shares of common stock upon the conversion of approximately $5.1 million of the principal and accrued interest under the Sentient Note resulted in Sentient’s ownership increasing from approximately 27% to approximately 46% of the Company’s outstanding common stock which resulted in greater control of the Company.

        On October 27, 2015, the Company borrowed $5.0 million from Sentient, the Company's largest stockholder pursuant to the terms of a Senior Secured Convertible Note (the "Sentient Note") and a related loan agreement, with principal and accrued interest due on October 27, 2016. On February 11, 2016, Sentient converted approximately $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the

3431


 

Table of Contents

conversion date) pursuant to the Sentient Note into 23,355,000 shares

One of the Company'sour stockholders owns a significant percentage of our common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.172 per share, reflecting 90% of the 15-day volume weighted average price ("VWAP") immediately preceding the conversion date (the "February Conversion"). On June 10, 2016, Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1 million of principal and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) pursuantcould block decisions or transactions that could be beneficial to the Sentient Note into 4,011,740 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.289 per share, equal to 90% of the 15-day VWAP immediately preceding the loan's original issue date (the "June Conversion" and together with the February Conversion, the "Conversions").other stockholders.

       As a resultOne of the Conversions, Sentient's ownership increased fromour stockholders, Sentient, owns approximately 27% to approximately 46%44% of the Company's outstanding common stock. With this increasedlevel of ownership, Sentient could exert significant control over the Company,us, including over the election of directors, changes in the size or the composition of the board of directors, and mergers and other business combinations involving the Company. Through greater control of the board of directors and increased voting power, including the potential to prevent a quorum at stockholders meetings, Sentient could control certain decisions, including decisions regarding qualification and appointment of officers, operations of the business including acquisition or disposition of our assets or purchases and sales of mining or exploration properties, dividend policy, and access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of equity or debt securities).Sentient’s. Sentient’s large share ownership will also make it difficult, if not impossible, for the Companyus to enter into a change of control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial for the Company’sour other shareholders.

If we commence mining in Mexico, we will likely enter into a collective bargaining agreement with a union that, together with labor and employment regulations, could adversely affect our mining activities and financial condition.

As wasis the case at our Velardeña Properties, mine employees in Mexico are typically represented by a union, and our relationship with our employees was,is, and we expect in the future will be, governed by collective bargaining agreements. Any collective bargaining agreement that we enter into with a union is likely to restrict our mining flexibility in and impose additional costs on our mining activities. In addition, relations between us and our employees in Mexico may be affected by changes in regulations or labor union requirements regarding labor relations that may be introduced by the Mexican authorities or by labor unions. Changes in legislation or in the relationship between us and our employees may have a material adverse effect on our mining activities and financial condition.

We may not mine the VelardeñVeolardeña Properties again.

 

In mid-November 2015, we shut down the mines and sulfide processing plant at our Velardeña Properties and placed them on care and maintenance.  Commencing mining again is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including:

whether we are able to create mine plans or gold recovery improvements that can achieve sustainable cash positive results at current and future metals prices;

unexpected events, including difficulties in maintaining the properties on a care and maintenance basis, potential sabotage or damage to the assets related to the suspension of mining, and variations in ore grade and relative amounts, grades and metallurgical characteristics of oxide and sulfide ores;

continued decreases or insufficient increases in gold and silver prices to permit us to achieve sustainable cash positive results;

actual holding and care and maintenance costs resulting from the shutdown exceeding current estimates or including unanticipated costs;

loss of and inability to adequately replace skilled mining and management personnel;

·

whether we are able to create mine plans or gold recovery improvements that can achieve sustainable cash positive results at current and future metals prices;

·

unexpected events, including difficulties in maintaining the properties on a care and maintenance basis, potential sabotage or damage to the assets related to the suspension of mining, and variations in ore grade and relative amounts, grades and metallurgical characteristics of oxide and sulfide ores;

·

continued decreases or insufficient increases in gold and silver prices to permit us to achieve sustainable cash positive results;

·

actual holding and care and maintenance costs resulting from the shutdown exceeding current estimates or including unanticipated costs;

·

loss of and inability to adequately replace skilled mining and management personnel;

·

strikes or other labor problems; and

·

our ability to obtain additional funding for general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities as currently conducted and possibly for a potential restart of our Velardeña Properties.

3532


 

Table of Contents

strikes or other labor problems; and

our ability to obtain additional funding for general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities as currently conducted and possibly for a potential restart of our Velardeña Properties.

Based on these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will restart mining activities at the Velardeña Properties.

Our ability to successfully conduct mining and processing activities resulting in long-term cash flow and profitability will be affected by changes in prices of silver, gold and other metals.

 

Our ability to successfully conduct mining and processing activities in Mexico, Argentina or other countries, to establish reserves and advance our exploration properties, and to become profitable in the future, as well as our long-term viability, depend, in large part, on the market prices of silver, gold, zinc, copper and other metals. The market prices for these metals are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:

·

global or regional consumption patterns;

·

supply of, and demand for, silver, gold, zinc, lead, copper and other metals;

·

speculative activities and hedging activities;

·

expectations for inflation;

·

political and economic conditions; and

·

supply of, and demand for, consumables required for extraction and processing of metals.

global or regional consumption patterns;

supply of, and demand for, silver, gold, zinc, lead, copper and other metals;

speculative activities and hedging activities;

expectations for inflation;

political and economic conditions; and

supply of, and demand for, consumables required for extraction and processing of metals.

The declines in silver and gold prices in 2013, 2014 and 2015recent years have had a significant impact on our mining activities, resulting in shutdowns in 2013 and 2015a shutdown of mining at our Velardeña Properties in 2015, and negatively affect mining opportunities at our other properties. Additionally, future weakness in the global economy could increase volatility in metals prices or depress metals prices, which could also affect our mining and processing plans at our Velardeña Properties or make it uneconomic for us to engage in mining or exploration activities. Volatility or sustained price declines may also adversely affect our ability to build or continue our business.

If products are processed from our Velardeña Properties or other mines in the future, they could contain higher than expected contaminants, thereby negatively impacting our financial condition.

 

In 2015 we processed mined material to make gold and silver bearing lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. Concentrate treatment charges paid to smelters and refineries include penalties for certain elements, including arsenic and antimony that exceed contract limits. In the future, if we process material from our VelardeñaProperties or other mines, any such concentrates could include higher than expected contaminants, which would result in higher treatment expenses and penalty charges that could increase our costs and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. This could occur due to unexpected variations in the occurrence of these elements in the material mined, problems that occur during blending of material from various locations in the mine prior to processing and other unanticipated events.

 

36


Table of Contents

The El Quevar project, the Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project and our other properties may not contain mineral reserves.

We are considered an exploration stage company under SEC Industry Guide 7, and none of the properties at our Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project, our Velardeña Properties, or any of our other properties have been shown to contain proven or probable mineral reserves. Expenditures made in mining at the Velardeña Properties or the exploration and advancement of our El Quevar project or other properties may not result in positive cash flow or in discoveries of commercially recoverable quantities of ore. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits, and we cannot assure you that any mineral deposit we identify will qualify as an orebody that can be legally and economically exploited or that any particular level of recovery from discovered mineralization will in fact be realized.

33


Table of Contents

During 2012, we released an estimate of mineralized material at our El Quevar project and in 2018 Wood Group completed an analysis and re-modeling of the data utilized in the prior mineralized material estimate. Tetra Tech completed a technical reportreports on our Velardeña Properties which indicated the presence of mineralized material, and RungePincockMinarco completed a technical report on our El Quevar property,Santa Maria and Rodeo properties, which indicated the presence of mineralized material. Mineralized material figures based on estimates made by geologists are inherently imprecise and depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling that may prove to be unreliable or inaccurate. We cannot assure you that these estimates are accurate or that proven and probable mineral reserves will be identified at the El Quevar project, the Velardeña Properties, El Quevarthe Santa Maria and Rodeo properties, or any of our other properties. Even if the presence of reserves is established at a project, the economic viability of the project may not justify exploitation. We have spent significant amounts on the evaluation of El Quevar prior to establishing the economic viability of that project.

Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and mining costs also can be affected by factors such as governmental regulations and requirements, fluctuations in metals prices or costs of essential materials or supplies, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties and unusual or unexpected geological formations. In addition, the grades of ore or material ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results, sampling, feasibility studies or technical reports. Short-term factors relating to reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on mining and on the results of operations. Silver, gold or other minerals recovered in small-scale laboratory tests may not be duplicated in large-scale tests under on-site processing conditions.

The Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project and our other properties are subject to foreign environmental laws and regulations which could materially adversely affect our business.

We have conducted mining activities in Mexico and conduct mineral exploration activities primarily in Mexico. Mexico and Argentina, where ourthe El Quevar project is located, have laws and regulations that control the exploration and mining of mineral properties and their effects on the environment, including air and water quality, mine reclamation, waste generation, handling and disposal, the protection of different species of flora and fauna and the preservation of lands. These laws and regulations require us to acquire permits and other authorizations for conducting certain activities. In many countries, there is relatively new comprehensive environmental legislation, and the permitting and authorization process may not be established or predictable. We may not be able to acquire necessary permits or authorizations on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in acquiring any permit or authorization could increase the cost of our projects and could suspend or delay the commencement of extraction and processing of mineralized material.

Our Velardeña Properties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the environmental protection agency of Mexico. In order to permit new facilities at or expand existing facilities, regulations require that an environmental impact statement, known in Mexico as a Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental (the “Manifestación”), be prepared by a third-party contractor for submission to SEMARNAT. Studies required to support the Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental include a detailed analysis of soil, water, vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and socio-economic impacts. The Manifestación is then published on SEMARNAT’s web page and in its official gazette in a national and local newspaper. The Manifestación is discussed at various open hearings, including hearings in the local communities, at which third parties may voice their views. We would be required to provide proof of local community support of the Manifestación as a condition to final approval. We may not be able to obtain community support of future projects.

37


Table of Contents

Environmental legislation in Mexico is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. For example, in January 2011, Article 180 of the Mexican Federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection was amended. Among other things, this amendment extended the term during which an individual or entity having a legitimate interest may contest administrative acts, including environmental authorizations, permits or concessions granted, without the need to demonstrate the actual existence of harm to the environment, natural resources, flora, fauna or human health, making it sufficient to argue that harm may be caused. Further, the amendment permits the contesting party to

34


Table of Contents

challenge a Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental through a variety of administrative or court procedures. As a result of the amendment, more legal actions supported or sponsored by non-governmental groups interested in halting projects may be filed against companies operating in all industrial sectors, including the mining sector. Mexican operations are also subject to the environmental agreements entered into by Mexico, the United States and Canada in connection with the North American Free Trade Agreement. Further, in August 2011, certain amendments to the Civil Federal Procedures Code of Mexico (“CFPC”) were published in the Official Daily of the Federation. The amendments establish three categories of collective actions by which 30 or more people claiming injury resulting from, among other things, environmental harm, will be deemed to have a sufficient and legitimate interest in seeking, through a civil procedure, restitution, economic compensation or suspension of the activities from which the alleged injury derived. These amendments to the CFPC may result in more litigation by plaintiffs seeking remedies for alleged environmental harms, including suspension of the activities alleged to cause harm. Future changes in environmental regulation in the jurisdictions where the Velardeña Properties are located may adversely affect our business, make our business prohibitively expensive, or prohibit it altogether.

 

Environmental legislation in many other countries, in addition to Mexico, is evolving in a manner that will likely require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. We cannot predict what environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted or adopted in the future or how future laws and regulations will be administered or interpreted. For example, in September 2010, the Argentine National Congress passed legislation which prohibits mining activity in glacial and surrounding areas. Although we do not currently anticipate that this legislation will impact the El Quevar project, the legislation provides an example of the evolving environmental legislation in the areas in which we operate. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations, as well as potentially more vigorous enforcement policies or regulatory agencies or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may (i) necessitate significant capital outlays, (ii) cause us to delay, terminate or otherwise change our intended activities with respect to one or more projects, or (iii) materially adversely affect our future exploration activities.

The Velardeña Properties and many of our exploration properties are located in historic mining districts where prior owners, including ECU in the case of the Velardeña Properties, may have caused environmental damage that may not be known to us or to the regulators. At the Velardeña Properties and in most other cases, we have not sought complete environmental analyses of our mineral properties. We have not conducted comprehensive reviews of the environmental laws and regulations in every jurisdiction in which we own or control mineral properties. Insurance fully covering many environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and mining) is not generally available. To the extent environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which we currently hold interests, or may hold interests in the future, that are unknown to us at present and that have been caused by us, or previous owners or operators, or that may have occurred naturally, and to the extent we are subject to environmental requirements or liabilities, the cost of compliance with these requirements and satisfaction of these liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable to fully fund the cost of remediation of any environmental condition, we may be required to suspend activities or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remediation.

In addition, U.S. or international legislative or regulatory action to address concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could negatively impact our business.

38


Table of Contents

Title to the Velardeña Properties and our other properties and rights may be defective or may be challenged.

Our policy is to seek to confirm the validity of our rights to, title to, or contract rights with respect to, each mineral property in which we have a material interest. However, we cannot guarantee that title to our properties will not be challenged. Title insurance is not available for our mineral properties, and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure rights to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. Accordingly, the Velardeña Properties and our other mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims,

35


Table of Contents

and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, we may be unable to conduct activities on our properties as permitted or to enforce our rights with respect to our properties, and the title to our mineral properties may also be impacted by state action. We have not conducted surveys of all of the exploration properties in which we hold direct or indirect interests and, therefore, the precise area and location of these exploration properties may be in doubt.

In most of the countries in which we operate, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners. Any such loss, reduction or imposition of partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Under the laws of Mexico, mineral resources belong to the state, and government concessions are required to explore for or exploit mineral reserves. Mineral rights derive from concessions granted, on a discretionary basis, by the Ministry of Economy, pursuant to the Mexican mining law and regulations thereunder. We hold title to the Velardeña Properties and our other properties in Mexico through these government concessions, but there is no assurance that title to the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties and other properties will not be challenged or impaired. The Velardeña Properties and other properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, interests or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. There could be valid challenges to the title of any of the claims comprising the Velardeña Properties that, if successful, could impair mining with respect to such properties in the future. A defect could result in our losing all or a portion of our right, title, and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.

Our Velardeña Properties mining concessions and our other mining concessions in Mexico may be terminated if our obligations to maintain the concessions in good standing are not satisfied, including obligations to explore or exploit the relevant concession, to pay any relevant fees, to comply with all environmental and safety standards, to provide information to the Ministry of Economy and to allow inspections by the Ministry of Economy. In addition to termination, failure to make timely concession maintenance payments and otherwise comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in reduction or expropriation of entitlements. Additionally, in 2014, new mining concessions became subject to additional review and approval by the Mexico Ministry of Energy.

Mining concessions in Mexico give exclusive exploration and exploitation rights to the minerals located in the concessions but do not include surface rights to the real property, which requires that we negotiate the necessary agreements with surface landowners. Many of our mining properties are subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities surrounding the properties in order to obtain surface rights to land needed in connection with our mining exploration activities. In connection with our Velardeña Properties, we have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights with a total annual cost of approximately $25,000. The first contract is a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021. The second contract is a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido signed in March 2013, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties. Our inability to maintain and periodically renew or expand these surface rights on favorable terms or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

39


Table of Contents

Mining and processing activities are dependent on the availability of sufficient water supplies to support our mining activities.

Mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties, as at most mines, requires significant amounts of water. At the Velardeña Properties, our ability to have sufficient water is dependent on our ability to maintain our water rights and claims. Water is provided for all of the mines comprising our Velardeña Properties by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration

36


Table of Contents

to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently only using water from the three wells associated with the oxide plant and from two of the three wells associated with the sulfide plant. We are required to make annual payments to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to these wells. We are required to pay a fine to the Mexican Government each year if we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. In addition to these fines, the Mexican Government reserves the right to cancel our title to the wells for abuse of these rules.

We currently have a sufficient amount of water for the third partythird-party processing activities at the oxide plant. However, if we began processing material from both the sulfide and oxide plants in the future, we may face shortages in our water supply, and therefore will need to obtain water from outside sources at higher costs. The loss of some or all water rights for any of our wells, in whole or in part, or shortages of water to which we have rights would require us to seek water from outside sources at higher costs and could require us to curtail or shut down mining and processing in the future. Laws and regulations may be introduced in the future which could limit our access to sufficient water resources in mining activities, thus adversely affecting our business.

There are significant hazards involved in underground mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties, not all of which are fully covered by insurance. To the extent we must pay the costs associated with such risks, our business may be negatively affected.

The mining and processing of the underground mines at our Velardeña Properties, as well as the conduct of our exploration programs that frequently require rehabilitation of and drilling in underground mine workings, are subject to numerous risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, encountering unusual or unexpected geological formations, formation pressures, cave-ins, underground fires or floods, power outages, labor disruptions, seismic activity, rock bursts, accidents relating to historical workings, landslides and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or processing facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced extraction and processing and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although we maintain insurance against risks inherent in the conduct of our business in amounts that we consider reasonable, this insurance contains, as in the case of our Velardeña Properties, exclusions and limitations on coverage, and will not cover all potential risks associated with mining and exploration activities, and related liabilities might exceed policy limits. As a result of any or all of the forgoing, particularly if the facilities are older, we could incur significant liabilities and costs that could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.

Our Velardeña Properties and most of our exploration properties are located in Mexico and are subject to various levels of political, economic, legal and other risks.

Our Velardeña Properties are located in Mexico, and, as such, are exposed to various levels of political, economic, legal and other risks and uncertainties, including local acts of violence, such as violence from drug cartels; military repression; extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labor unrest; the risks of war or civil unrest; expropriation and nationalization; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; illegal mining; acts of political corruption; changes in taxation policies; restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions (including potential instability if the United States withdraws from or renegotiates the North American Free Trade Agreement), currency controls and governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Furthermore, given the uncertainties surrounding the policies of the new US Administration, the

40


Table of Contents

political relationship between the United States and Mexico may deteriorate, creating further political risk of doing business in Mexico.

37


Table of Contents

In the past, Mexico has been subject to political instability, changes and uncertainties, which have resulted in changes to existing governmental regulations affecting mineral exploration and mining activities. Mexico’s status as a developing country may make it more difficult for us to obtain any required funding for our Velardeña Properties or other projects in Mexico in the future.

Our Mexican properties are subject to a variety of governmental regulations governing health and worker safety, employment standards, waste disposal, protection of historic and archaeological sites, mine development, protection of endangered and protected species, purchase, storage and use of explosives and other matters. Specifically, our activities related to the Velardeña Properties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the ComisionComisión Nacional del Agua, which regulates water rights, and Mexican mining laws. Mexican regulators have broad authority to shut down and levy fines against facilities that do not comply with regulations or standards.

Our Velardeña Properties and mineral exploration activities in Mexico may be adversely affected in varying degrees by changing government regulations relating to the mining industry or shifts in political conditions that increase the costs related to our mining and exploration activities or the maintenance of our properties. For example, in January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholders of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profits and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum that were effective March 2015. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.

Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies, changes or increases in the legal rights of indigenous populations or in the difficulty or expense of obtaining rights from them that are necessary for our Velardeña Properties or shifts in political attitude may adversely affect our business and financial condition. Our mining and exploration activities may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on extraction, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income and other taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Restart of mining or use of both the oxide and sulfide plant may also require us to assure the availability of adequate supplies of water and power, which could be affected by government policy and competing businesses in the area. The occurrence of these various factors and uncertainties cannot be accurately predicted and could have an adverse effect on our mining and exploration activities and financial condition.

Future changes in applicable laws and regulations or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could negatively impact current or planned exploration or mining activities at our Velardeña Properties or in respect of any of our other projects in Mexico or projects with which we become involved in Mexico. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in the interruption of mining and exploration or material fines, penalties or other liabilities.

Most of our costs are subject to exchange control policies, the effects of inflation and currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso.

Our revenue and external funding are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. However, mining, processing, maintenance and exploration costs at the Velardeña Properties and most of our exploration properties are denominated principally in Mexican pesos. These costs principally include electricity, labor, water, maintenance, local contractors and fuel. When inflation in Mexico increases without a corresponding devaluation of the Mexican peso, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The annual average inflation rate in Mexico was 3.2%4.8% in 2016, 2.1%2018, 6.0 % in 20152017 and  4.1%2.8% in 2014.2016. At the same time, the peso has been subject to significant fluctuation, which may not have been proportionate to the inflation rate and may not be proportionate to the inflation rate in the future. The value of the peso decreased by 4.7% in 2018, increased by 5.0% in 2017, and decreased by 19% in 2016. In addition, fluctuations

4138


 

Table of Contents

peso decreased by 19% in 2016, decreased by 17% in 2015 and decreased by 13% in 2014. In addition, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on our financial results. There can be no assurance that the Mexican government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso’speso's value will not fluctuate significantly in the future. We cannot assure you that currency fluctuations, inflation and exchange control policies will not have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, earnings and cash flows.

If we are unable to obtain all of our required governmental permits or obtain property rights on favorable terms or at all, our business could be negatively impacted.

Future mining and current processing at our Velardeña Properties, the continued evaluation of the El Quevar project and other exploration activities will require additional permits from various governmental authorities. Our business is and will continue to be governed by laws and regulations governing mining, exploration, prospecting, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety, mining royalties and other matters. We may also be required to obtain certain property rights to access or use our properties. Obtaining or renewing licenses and permits, and acquiring property rights, can be complex and time-consuming processes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire all required licenses, permits or property rights on reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, and that such terms will not be adversely changed, that required extensions will be granted, or that the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged by third parties. Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain any licenses, permits or property rights or any required extensions; challenges to the issuance of licenses, permits or property rights, whether successful or unsuccessful; changes to the terms of licenses, permits or property rights; or a failure to comply with the terms of any licenses, permits or property rights that have been obtained could have a material adverse effect on our business by delaying, preventing or making future mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties and other continued processing activities economically unfeasible. U.S. or international legislative or regulatory action to address concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could also negatively impact our business. While we will continue to monitor and assess any new policies, legislation or regulations regarding such matters, we currently believe that the impact of such legislation on our business will not be significant.

We depend on the services of key executives.

 

Our business strategy is based on leveraging the experience and skill of our management team. We are dependent on the services of key executives, including Warren Rehn and Robert Vogels. Due to our relatively small size, the loss of any of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to manage and succeed in our mining and exploration activities.

The exploration of our mineral properties is highly speculative in nature, involves substantial expenditures and is frequently non-productive.

 

Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive. Substantial expenditures are required to:

establish mineral reserves through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques;

determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to process metal from the ore;

determine the feasibility of mine development and production; and

construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities.

·

establish mineral reserves through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques;

·

determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to process metal from the ore;

·

determine the feasibility of mine development and production; and

·

construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities.

If we discover a deposit or ore at a property, it usually takes several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of a project may change because of increased costs,

42


Table of Contents

lower metal prices or other factors. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not successfully acquire additional mineral

39


Table of Contents

rights, or our exploration programs may not result in proven and probable reserves at all or in sufficient quantities to justify developing the El Quevar project or any of our exploration properties.

The decisions about future advancement of exploration projects may be based on feasibility studies, which derive estimates of mineral reserves, operating costs and project economic returns. Estimates of economic returns are based, in part, on assumptions about future metal prices and estimates of average cash operating costs based upon, among other things:

anticipated tonnage, grades and metallurgical characteristics of ore to be mined and processed;

anticipated recovery rates of silver and other metals from the ore;

cash operating costs of comparable facilities and equipment; and

anticipated climatic conditions.

·

anticipated tonnage, grades and metallurgical characteristics of ore to be mined and processed;

·

anticipated recovery rates of silver and other metals from the ore;

·

cash operating costs of comparable facilities and equipment; and

·

anticipated climatic conditions.

Actual cash operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those anticipated by our studies and estimates.

Lack of infrastructure could forestall or prevent further exploration and advancement.

 

Exploration activities, as well as any advancement activities, depend on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources and water supply are important factors that affect capital and operating costs and the feasibility and economic viability of a project. Unanticipated or higher than expected costs and unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, or government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our exploration activities are in countries with developing economies and are subject to the risks of political and economic instability associated with these countries.

 

We currently conduct exploration activities almost exclusively in countries with developing economies, including Argentina and Mexico. These countries and other emerging markets in which we may conduct business have from time to time experienced economic or political instability. We may be materially adversely affected by risks associated with conducting exploration activities in countries with developing economies, including:

political instability and violence;

war and civil disturbance;

acts of terrorism or other criminal activity;

expropriation or nationalization;

changing fiscal, royalty and tax regimes;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

high rates of inflation;

·

political instability and violence;

·

war and civil disturbance;

·

acts of terrorism or other criminal activity;

·

expropriation or nationalization;

·

changing fiscal, royalty and tax regimes;

·

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

·

high rates of inflation;

·

uncertain or changing legal requirements respecting the ownership and maintenance of mineral properties, mines and mining activities, and inconsistent or arbitrary application of such legal requirements;

4340


 

Table of Contents

uncertain or changing legal requirements respecting the ownership and maintenance of mineral properties, mines and mining activities, and inconsistent or arbitrary application of such legal requirements;

underdeveloped industrial and economic infrastructure;

corruption; and

unenforceability of contractual rights.

·

underdeveloped industrial and economic infrastructure;

·

corruption; and

·

unenforceability of contractual rights.

Changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in the prevailing political climate in any of the countries in which we conduct exploration activities could adversely affect our business.

We conduct our business in countries that may be adversely affected by changes in the local government’s policies toward or laws governing the mining industry.

We have exploration activities primarily in Mexico and Argentina. In these regions there exist uncertainties regarding future changes in applicable law related to mining and exploration. For instance, in January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholders of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profits and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum that were effective March 2015. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.

Additionally, effective January 2015, the Argentina National Mining Code was amended, increasing the annual canon payment by approximately four times. In 20152017 and 2016,2018, our annual canon fees payable to the Argentine government was $40,000$113,000 and $112,000$57,000 respectively, and we expect to pay approximately $115,000$60,000 in 2017.

2019.

In addition to the risk of increased transaction costs, we do not maintain political risk insurance to cover losses that we may incur as a result of nationalization, expropriation or similar events in Mexico or Argentina where we explore or have mining and processing activities.

We compete against larger and more experienced companies.

The mining industry is intensely competitive. Many large mining companies are primarily makers of precious or base metals and may become interested in the types of deposits on which we are focused, which include silver, gold and other precious metals deposits or polymetallic deposits containing significant quantities of base metals, including zinc, lead and copper. Many of these companies have greater financial resources, experience and technical capabilities than we do. We may encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in our efforts to acquire mineral properties and hire experienced mining professionals. Increased competition in our business could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable mining properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

We are dependent on information technology systems, which are subject to certain risks, including cybersecurity risks and data leakage risks.

We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our business. Any significant breakdown, invasion, virus, cyber attack, security breach, destruction or interruption of these systems by employees, others with authorized access to our systems, or unauthorized persons could negatively impact our business. To the extent any invasion, cyber attack or security breach results in disruption to our business, loss or disclosure of, or damage to, our data or confidential information, our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our systems and insurance coverage for protecting against cyber security risks may not be sufficient.

44


Table of Contents

Although to date we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks, we may suffer such losses in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or

41


Table of Contents

measures. We also may be subject to investigatesignificant litigation, regulatory investigation and remediateremediation costs associated with any information security vulnerabilities.

vulnerabilities, cyber attacks or security breaches.

The existence of a significant number of warrants may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

In connection with our financing in May 2016, we issued five year warrants to acquire 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share expiring in MayNovember 2021. In connection with our financing in September 2014, we issued five year warrants to acquire 4,746,000 shares of our common stock at $1.21 per share expiring in September 2019. In connection with our financing in September 2012, we issued five year warrants to purchase 3,431,649 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.42 per share expiring September 2017. Pursuant to the anti-dilution clauses in the September 2012 and 2014 warrant agreements, the exercise price of the warrants has been adjusted downward as a result of the subsequent issuance of the Company'sour common stock in separate transactions, including pursuant to the Hecla Share Issuance (as defined herein), our ATM Program, the May 2016 financing, the September 2014 financing and the conversion of the Sentient Note.Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Sentient Note”) and the May 2018 issuances under the LPC Program. As a result of these transactions, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2012 warrants was increased from the original 3,431,649 shares to 6,150,963 shares (2,719,314 share increase) and the exercise price was reduced from the original $8.42 per share to $4.70 per share. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2014 warrants was increased from the original 4,746,000 shares to 5,460,6125,517,696 shares (714,612(771,696 share increase) and the exercise price was reduced from the original $1.21 per share to $0.87$0.85 per share. The existence of securities available for exercise and resale is referred to as an "overhang," and, particularly if the warrants are "in the money," the anticipation of potential sales could exert downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.

Failure to meet the maintenance criteria of the NYSE MKTAmerican may result in the delisting of our common stock, which could result in lower trading volumes and liquidity, lower prices of our common shares and make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT,American, and we are subject to its continued listing requirements, including maintaining certain share prices and a minimum amount of shareholders equity. The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuation. If we are unable to comply with the NYSE MKTAmerican continued listing requirements, including its trading price requirements, our common stock may be suspended from trading on and/or delisted from the NYSE MKT.  Alternatively, in order to avoid delisting by the NYSE MKT, we may be required to effect a reverse split of our common stock.American. Although we have not been notified of any delisting proceedings, there is no assurance that we will not receive such notice in the future or that we will be able to then comply with NYSE MKTAmerican listing standards. The delisting of our common stock from the NYSE MKTAmerican may materially impair our stockholders’stockholders' ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. In addition, the delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.

If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer could find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock in the secondary market.

If our common stock were removed from listing on the NYSE MKT,American, it may be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock on the secondary market. These factors could significantly negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital.

45


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 1B:  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

42


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 3:  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

None.

 

ITEM 4:  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

4643


 

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5:  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Our common stock began trading on the NYSE MKTAmerican under the symbol “AUMN” on March 19, 2010.  The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share and volume traded on the NYSE MKT from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traded

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

(shares)

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

0.67

 

$

0.39

 

6,947,400

 

Second Quarter

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.32

 

4,651,700

 

Third Quarter

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.23

 

5,637,700

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.41

 

$

0.19

 

6,150,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traded

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

(shares)

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

0.68

 

$

0.13

 

16,384,800

 

Second Quarter

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.31

 

45,674,400

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.16

 

$

0.66

 

53,664,500

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.84

 

$

0.58

 

27,452,000

 

Our common stock is also listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also referred to as the “TSX”, and trades under the symbol “AUMN”. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share expressed in Canadian dollars and volume traded on the TSX from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Traded

 

 

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(shares)

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

0.82

 

$

0.44

 

917,000

 

Second Quarter

 

$

0.64

 

$

0.36

 

249,900

 

Third Quarter

 

$

0.51

 

$

0.31

 

435,600

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.47

 

$

0.26

 

825,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Traded

 

 

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(shares)

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

0.93

 

$

0.19

 

1,543,600

 

Second Quarter

 

$

1.22

 

$

0.42

 

5,822,300

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.51

 

$

0.88

 

5,043,100

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

1.10

 

$

0.77

 

2,239,400

 


(1)

Prices are in Canadian dollars.

47


Table of Contents

As of February 24, 2017,27, 2019, we had 209185 record holders of our common stock of record based upon the stockholders list provided by our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

 

Dividends

 

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, to fund the growth of our business.

 

ITEM 6:  SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The selected consolidated financial data for all periods presented has been derived from our audited financial statements for that period. Our financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

 

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Statement of Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

6,400

 

$

8,071

 

$

235

 

$

10,680

 

$

26,086

 

 

$

7,217

 

$

6,691

 

$

6,400

 

$

8,071

 

$

235

 

Net Loss(1)

 

$

(10,659)

 

$

(25,383)

 

$

(18,823)

 

$

(240,380)

 

$

(92,025)

 

 

$

(1,945)

 

$

(3,892)

 

$

(10,659)

 

$

(25,383)

 

$

(18,823)

 

Net Loss per common share

 

$

(0.13)

 

$

(0.48)

 

$

(0.41)

 

$

(5.61)

 

$

(2.45)

 

 

$

(0.02)

 

$

(0.04)

 

$

(0.13)

 

$

(0.48)

 

$

(0.41)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

At December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

 

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

14,008

 

$

17,001

 

$

41,258

 

$

54,881

 

$

348,102

 

 

$

12,644

 

$

13,077

 

$

14,008

 

$

17,001

 

$

41,258

 

Long term liabilities

 

$

4,398

 

$

2,840

 

$

4,334

 

$

2,655

 

$

49,524

 

 

$

3,000

 

$

3,138

 

$

4,398

 

$

2,840

 

$

4,334

 

Dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 


(1)

The year ended December 31, 2015 includes a $13.2 million impairment of long-lived assets charge. The impairment charge is related to our Velardeña Properties in Mexico and is the result of the shutdown of mining and sulfide processing at the Velardeña Properties in November 2015, which was an event requiring an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties assets. There were no such charges during the year ended December 31, 2016. The year ended December 31, 2013 includes a $244.0 million impairment of long-lived assets charge and an $11.7 million impairment of goodwill charge. Both charges are related to our Velardeña Properties in Mexico and are the result of a significant decrease in metals prices during 2013 and the shutdown of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties at the endany of the second quarter 2013, which were events requiring an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties assets. The year ended December 31, 2012 includes a $58.5 million impairment of goodwill charge related to our Velardeña Properties in Mexico and is the result of an approximately 20% decrease in our forecast of future gold and silver prices and certain assumptions related to ore processing throughput rates and other aspects of the long-term mining plan.years presented.

 

4844


 

Table of Contents

ITEM 7:  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes beginning on page F-1 in this annual report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

Our Company

 

We were incorporated in Delaware under the Delaware General Corporation Law in March 2009, and are the successor to Apex Silver Mines Limited for purposes of reporting under the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, our only sources of income were revenues from the lease of our oxide plant, sales of non-core assets, and a tax refund received by a Mexicanan Argentine subsidiary. We incurred net operating losses for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017.

 

We remain focused on evaluation activities at our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina and on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, and particularly forincluding properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña Properties. processing plants.  We are also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarilyfocused and are continuing our exploration efforts on development or operatingselected properties in North America, includingour portfolio of approximately 12 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico.

 

20162018 Highlights

 

El Quevar

In 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler E&C Services, Inc., a Wood Group PLC company (“Wood”) undertook an analysis and re-modeling of data utilized in a 2012 mineralized material estimate for our El Quevar project, located in the Salta Province of Argentina, which was based on results from 270 core drill holes and assumed mining of oxide material from an open pit on the east end of the Yaxtché deposit and sulfide material from both the open pit and an underground mine on the western portion of the Yaxtché deposit.  The Wood estimate, which the Company announced in February 2018, used updated geologic controls and a modeling method that optimized silver grade assuming mining would occur solely underground.  According to the Wood estimate, sulfide mineralized material in the Yaxtché deposit, at a cut-off grade of 250 grams per tonne (“g/t”) silver and using a three-year average silver price of $16.62 per ounce, was 2.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 487 g/t.

In September 2018, we completed a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) that used the revised estimate of mineralized material for the Yaxtché deposit as a basis.  The PEA contemplates a six-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at a mine production rate of 1,200 tonnes per day using a post-pillar cut-and-fill mining method that will deliver 2.45 million tonnes of diluted sulfide material at an average grade of 409 g/t silver. As contemplated in the PEA, the mined material would be processed using a conventional single product flotation mill that would produce a silver-rich bulk concentrate suitable for sale.    

The Yaxtché deposit is open to the west and there are numerous drill intercepts with silver grades of economic interest in the nearby area that represent targets for further expansion.  In the first quarter 2019, we plan to initiate a 3,000 meter, approximately $0.6 million drilling program to further define the potential for additional mineralized material in the Yaxtché deposit and surrounding area.  We plan to continue to advance El Quevar as much as possible within the limits of our current exploration budget and remain open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration and development.

45


Table of Contents

Velardeña Oxide Plant Lease Agreement

 

In July 2015, we leased our Velardeña oxide plant toOn October 1, 2018, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. During the third quarter 2016 Hecla(together “Hecla”) exercised its rightoption, pursuant to an agreement entered into with us in August 2017, to extend the initial 18-month term for six additional monthslease of our Velardeña oxide plant until June 30, 2017, as permitted under the original lease agreement.  As contemplated by the original agreement, the Company and Hecla also reached agreement regarding an expansion of the tailings impoundment, at Hecla’s cost, to accommodate Hecla’s use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount, while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The agreed expansion is estimated to cost approximately $1.5 million, and Hecla has obtained the necessary permits for such expansion. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed thatDecember 31, 2020.  Hecla has the right to extendterminate the lease for an additional 18 monthsany reason with 120 days’ notice.  Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following June 30, 2017, or untila termination notice through December 31, 2018.2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for our own purposes before December 31, 2020.

 

Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, Hecla processed approximately 136,000142,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $6.4$7.2 million, comprised of approximately $3.0$4.9 million for direct plant charges plusand fixed fees and approximately $2.3 million for other net reimbursable costs totaling approximately $3.4 million. We incurred costs of approximately $2.0 million related to the services we provide under the lease.  The $2.3 million of reimbursable costs are also reported as plant lease for acosts, resulting in net operating margin of $4.4approximately $4.9 million during 2016.for the year ended December 31, 2018. We expect Hecla reached itsto continue to process material near the intended processing throughput of approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2016 and, at this rate,2019, which would generate a net cash paymentsoperating margin to us, net of reimbursable costs, should total approximately $0.4 million per month, including variable and fixed fees, or nearly $5.0 million annually.

Sentient Loan Financing

On October 27, 2015 the Company closed on and borrowed the entire amount available under a $5.0 million secured convertible loan (the “Sentient Loan”) from Sentient. The proceeds from the loan enabled us to fund the suspension

49


Table of Contents

of mining and processing activities at the Velardeña Properties and continue our long term business strategy into 2016. At a special meeting of the stockholders held on January 19, 2016 our stockholders approved the issuance of our common stock upon conversion of the Sentient Loan.

In February 2016 Sentient converted $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest under the Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Sentient Note”) into 23,355,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.172 per share, reflecting 90% of the 15-day VWAP immediately preceding the conversion date. In June 2016 Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1$4.6 million of principal and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) into 4,011,740 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.289 per share, equal to 90% of the 15day VWAP immediately preceding the loan’s original issue date. After the conversions, the Sentient Note is no longer outstanding and, following the sale of additional shares of our common stock in 2017 pursuant to the ATM Program (discussed below), Sentient holds approximately 46% of our 89.7 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock.

Offering and Private Placement

On May 6, 2016, we issued 8.0 million registered shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) resulting in gross proceeds of $4.0 million. We incurred costs and fees of approximately $0.4 million related to the Offering resulting in net proceeds of approximately $3.6 million.  In connection with the Offering, each investor received an unregistered warrant to purchase threequarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.75 per share and are exercisable beginning six months after the date of issuance and will expire five years from the initial exercise date.

At the Market Offering Program

On December 20, 2016, we entered into an at-the-market offering agreement (the “ATM Agreement”) with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright”), under which we may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of our common stock through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $5.0 million (the “ATM Program”) or a maximum 10 million shares.  The common stock will be distributed at the market prices prevailing at the time of sale. The ATM Agreement provides that Wainwright will be entitled to compensation for its services at a commission rate of 2.0% of the gross sales price per share of common stock sold.  The Company reimbursed certain legal expenses of Wainwright totaling $50,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $103,000 in connection with establishing the ATM Program.  At December 31, 2016 no offers or sales were made under the ATM Program. 

Subsequent to December 31, 2016 we sold an aggregate of approximately 640,000 common shares under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.74 per common share for gross proceeds of approximately $475,000 during the full year to date period ended February 24, 2017. We paid a 2% cash commission on the gross proceeds in the amount of approximately $10,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $2,000.

Santa Maria

At the Santa Maria mine west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, we have recently completed an underground drilling program of 2,200 meters in 24 drill holes. Assay results are complete. During the first two quarters of 2016 we mined approximately 4,500 tonnes of material as a bulk sample with grades of approximately 235 gpt silver and 0.7 gpt gold. This material was substantially lower in grade than material mined in 2015 from the same vein. We processed the bulk sample through a toll milling facility, generating approximately 100 tonnes of concentrates containing approximately 22,000 ounces of silver and 44 ounces of gold.  The concentrates were sold to a third party for approximately $300,000 during the first two quarters of 2016 consisting of approximately 21,000 payable ounces of silver and 40 payable ounces of gold, which offset exploration costs. The average grade of 7,500 tons mined and processed in bulk samples since 2015 is 338 gpt silver and 0.7 gpt gold. 

50


Table of Contents

We have2019.  However, because Hecla has the right to acquireterminate the Santa Maria property under an option agreement.  The option agreement requires an additional approximately $0.9 million to be paid to acquire 100% of the Santa Maria property.  Minimum payments of $0.1 million are due every six months in April and October and the minimum payments for 2017 have already been paid to the property owner. In addition, until the total due under the option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to 50% of any net profits from mining activities at the property, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by the Company since April 2015, to the extentlease with 120 days’ notice, there is no assurance that such net profit payments exceed the minimum payments.

In February 2017 a PEA was completed on our behalf by Tetra Tech based on an updated estimate of mineralized material. The PEA presents a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit.  The PEA contemplates a 38-month underground mining operation at a mining rate of 200 tonnes per day using a combination of cut and fill and other mining techniques, and custom milling at a local third-party flotation mill.  Based on the assumptions in the PEA, we believe there may be potential to develop a small mining operation at Santa Maria.

In 2017 we plan tothese amounts will continue work related to optimizing mining plans for the project and obtaining permits for the potential mining operation as considered in the current PEA.  Permit applications have been submitted and are pending comment and acceptance.  We are also developing plans for additional exploration work to potentially expand the deposit.  However, no development decision has been made with respect to the project.

Rodeo

In June 2016, we began a 2,080 meter core drilling program at the Rodeo property, approximately 80 kilometers west of the Velardeña Properties in Durango Mexico at a cost of approximately $0.4 million.through 2019 or beyond.The results from the program show a gold and silver bearing epithermal vein and breccia system with encouraging gold and silver values over an approximate 50 to 70 meter true width.  The system is exposed at the top of a northwesterly striking ridge and dips steeply to the northeast over about one kilometer of strike length. 

During January 2017, the engineering firm of Tetra Tech completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Rodeo deposit, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101.  Tetra Tech’s report presents two mineralized material estimates based on two different operating scenarios.  The first operating scenario reflects a smaller amount of higher grade material and estimated mineralized material of 0.4 million tonnes containing 3.3 gpt gold and 11 gpt silver.  We believe this material, as currently identified, could provide additional mined material for our Velardeña oxide mill following the completion of the Hecla lease, currently set to expire no later than December 31, 2018. This scenario provides a potentially shorter time to processing with lower capital costs since we already own the mill, located within trucking distance of the Rodeo property.  The second operating scenario reflects a larger amount of lower grade material and estimated mineralized material of 3.6 million tonnes containing 0.8 gpt gold and 12 gpt silver.  The second mineralized material estimate envisions a standalone heap leach operation, depending on leachability of the material and development and operating costs.

In 2017 we plan to continue work related to metallurgical studies, economic evaluation and potential resource expansion.

 

Celaya Farm-out

 

In August 2016,September 2018, our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary entered into a second and final amendment to an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Global Holdings, L.P.,Group LLC, a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to the farm-out of our Celaya exploration property in Mexico.  WePursuant to the second amendment, Electrum acquired 100% of our remaining interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $3.0 million, as set out in a definitive Assignment of Rights Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) containing customary terms and conditions.  The earn-in agreement was terminated upon entry into the Assignment Agreement.

The Celaya earn-in agreement with Electrum commenced in August 2016 when we received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum has agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million within the first year of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. Electrum at its option, can electinitially earned the right to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project afterby incurring exploration expenditures totaling at least $2.5 million during the initial first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as manager of the joint venture. Prior to the subsequent amendments to the agreement, we would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest in the Celaya project, following the initial earn-in period, by contributing our pro-rata share of an additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period. 

In February 2018, we amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an incremental 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $1.0 million.  Following the amendment, Electrum could have increased its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.5 million of additional expenditures required in the second three-year earn-in period.  Following the second earn-in period, and prior to entering into the Assignment Agreement, we could have maintained our 20% participating interest or our interest could ultimately have been converted into a carried 10% net profits interest if we elected not to participate as a joint venture owner.

We have previously expensed all of our costs associated with the Celaya property and accordingly recognized a gain of $1.0 million from the execution of the first amendment to the agreement and $3.0 million upon execution of the Assignment Agreement, for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018, included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

5146


 

Table of Contents

serve as manager

Santa Maria

Since 2015, we have completed test mining and processing of 7,100 dry tonnes from the Santa Maria mine west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, with average grades 338 g/t silver and 0.8 g/t gold.  In March 2017, a PEA was completed on our behalf by the engineering firm Tetra Tech, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on an updated estimate of mineralized material.  The PEA presented a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit.  In September 2018, Tetra Tech completed a second PEA for the Santa Maria project that incorporates data accumulated since March 2017, including an additional 77 hectares of mineral tenure acquired in August 2017 that covers the on-strike and downdip extensions of the joint venture. IfSanta Maria vein systems. The new PEA also incorporates information from a 22-hole, 4,800-meter drilling program begun in August 2017 and completed in April 2018.  Including the latest drill program, we elect nothave drilled 9,900 meters in 59 holes since acquiring the property.  Surface mapping and sampling has also identified additional high-grade veins on the adjacent eastern extension of the Santa Maria property and on new veins to contributethe north located outside of the mineralized material area as defined in the March 2017 PEA.

The September 2018 PEA shows improvement in projected cash flow, metal production and profitability compared to additional exploration orthe previous study. The PEA estimates a 4.2-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development expenditures afterat an average mine production rate of 218 tonnes per day, using a combination of cut-and-fill and sublevel stoping. It is currently envisioned that both mixed and sulfide materials will undergo toll-milling at a local third-party facility with sulfide flotation circuits. Oxide material will be cyanide leached at the initial earn-in period, Electrum,same toll-milling facility. In the PEA, Santa Maria is estimated to deliver 150k tonnes of diluted sulfide material to the mill at its option, wouldan average grade of 378 g/t silver equivalent (“AgEq”, calculated by combining Ag and Au values where one g/t of Au equals 74 g/t of Ag), 116k tonnes of diluted oxide material at an average grade of 428 g/t AgEq and 42k tonnes of diluted mixed material at an average grade of 278 g/t AgEq. 

We have the right to earnacquire 100% of the Santa Maria property under two separate option agreements representing the total concessions that comprise the property for additional payments of $1.0 million, payable through April 2022. The first option agreement covers concessions we acquired in August 2014 and requires an additional 20% interestapproximately $0.4 million be paid by continuing to make minimum payments of $0.2 million in 2019 and $0.2 million in 2020.  In addition, until the Celaya project, for a total interest of 80%, by incurring an additional $2.5 million of exploration or development expenditures over a second three-year period. Followingdue under the second earn-in period we wouldfirst option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to maintain our 20% interest or our interest ultimately could be converted into a 10%50% of any net profits interest.from mining activities from the concessions related to the option, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by us since April 2015, to the extent that such net profit payments exceed the minimum payments.  The second option agreement covers concessions recently acquired in August 2017 and requires an additional approximately $0.6 million be paid by making additional payments of $0.2 million in each of the years 2019 through 2021.

 

The 6,200-hectare silver and gold Celaya project contains a strongly developed alteration system on the main Mexico silver belt trend, located 10 kilometers east of Plata Latina’s Naranjillo silver and gold discovery and 45 kilometers southeast of and on trend with the historic Guanajuato District. We have conducted mapping and sampling activities at Celaya since 2012.  We completed a 2,000 meter, three-hole drilling program in 2015 that identified epithermal gold and silver mineralization beneath a portion of the widespread clay-silica alteration on the claims comprising the project.Zacatecas

 

Electrum Global Holdings’ Mexican subsidiary, Minera Adularia, has conducted extensive geologic mapping and sampling on the Celaya property.  New targets have been identified and exploration drilling to test these targets began in January 2017.

Sale of San Diego Exploration Property

On August 2, 2016, we sold our remaining 50% interest in the San Diego property in Mexico to Golden Tag Resources, Ltd, which held the other 50% interest in the property, for approximately $379,000 in cash and 2,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag. Pursuant to the sales agreement, Golden Tag will be required to pay us a 2% net smelter return royalty on production from the San Diego property. We now hold 7,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag, representing approximately 10% of its outstanding common shares.

Sale of Mining Equipment to a Related Party

On August 8, 2016, we sold certain mining equipment consisting of two haul trucks, two scoop trams and a compressor to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient, a related party, for $687,000. The equipment sold was excess equipment held at our Velardeña Properties that we did not expect to use. We used a third party consultant with experience in the used mining equipment market in Mexico to determine a fair value. We believe the price paid was at least equal to the fair market value of the equipment had it been sold through auction or in the open market. We received 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale in August, with the additional 90%, plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, due in February 2017.

With the approval of a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, we expect to amend the original equipment sale in February 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000.   Upon execution of the amendment we expect to receive an additional payment of $100,000, and the remaining principal and interest balance as of February 2017 of $737,000, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, would be due in August 2017.

El Quevar

We continue to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance until we can fund further exploration ourselves or find a partner to fund further exploration.

Other Exploration

OnIn April 28, 2016, we entered into an option agreement, which was later amended in February 2018, under which Santa CruzSantacruz Silver Mining Ltd. may acquire(“Santacruz”) has acquired our interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims located in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, MexicoProperties for a series of payments totaling approximately $1.5 million.  Santa CruzPayments of $249,000, $225,000 and $212,000 were paid to us during the Company $0.2 million on signingfirst, second and third quarters of 2018, respectively.  The final payment of $13,000 was received by us in October 2018.

We had previously expensed all of the costs associated with the Zacatecas Properties.  We recognized income, equal to the cash payments made, evenly over the period covered by each payment.  We have recognized approximately $748,000 of income under the agreement for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2018, there were no further performance obligations and we had taken all steps necessary for Santacruz to take title to the properties.

Other Exploration - Yoquivo

The Yoquivo property was acquired in 2017 and consists of 1,907 hectares in 6 claims that cover an additional $0.2 millionepithermal vein district hosted in October 2016. In order to maintain its option and acquire the Zacatecas Properties, Santa CruzTertiary andesitic volcanic rocks that is requiredexposed in an erosional window through Oligocene rhyolite

5247


 

Table of Contents

on the eastern margin of the Sierra Madre Occidental of northern Mexico.  The property is 200 km SW of Chihuahua city in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico.  Recent surface rock sampling has demonstrated gold and silver values of potential economic interest in several of the veins in the district.  We have an option to purchase the six concessions that comprise the Yoquivo property for payments totaling $0.5 million over four years subject to a 2% NSR royalty on production, capped at $2 million.

In October 2018 we announced high-grade silver-gold assays from the Yoquivo project. Multiple silver-gold bearing epithermal veins were mapped and sampled, with the two most important veins being the San Francisco and Pertenencia veins. A new vein, the La Nina vein, was discovered in the northwest of the property where it splits off from the main San Francisco vein. We are focusing exploration efforts on the Pertenencia vein, which appears to be more silver-rich compared to the San Francisco vein. Sampling of the Pertenencia vein is still in progress as is surface work in preparation for identifying the best drill targets. We expect to begin a drill program in 2019 to test the most promising portions of the veins.  A permit for drilling has been obtained.

Registered direct purchase agreement and commitment purchase agreement and registration rights agreement

On May 9, 2018 we entered into a registered direct purchase agreement (the “Registered Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“LPC”) pursuant to which LPC purchased 3,153,808 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.4122 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE American on May 8, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.3 million.  On the same day, we also entered into a commitment purchase agreement (the “Commitment Purchase Agreement” and together with the Registered Purchase Agreement, the “LPC Program”) pursuant to which we have the right for a period of three years, at our sole discretion, to sell up to an additional $10.0 million of our common stock to LPC, subject to certain limitations and conditions contained in the Commitment Purchase Agreement. 

Subject to the terms of the Commitment Purchase Agreement, we will control the timing and amount of any future sale of common stock to LPC. LPC has no right to require any sales by us under the Commitment Purchase Agreement but is obligated to make purchases at our sole direction, as governed by such agreement. There are no upper limits to the price LPC may be obligated to pay additional amountsto purchase common stock from us and the purchase price of $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million due 12, 18 and 24 months after signing respectively.  Santa Cruzthe shares will be based on the prevailing market prices of our shares at the time of each sale to LPC. LPC has agreed not to cause or engage in any manner whatsoever, any direct or indirect short selling or hedging of our shares of common stock.  We have the right to terminate the option agreementCommitment Purchase Agreement at any time, and the agreement will terminate if Santa Cruz fails to make a payment when due.  at our discretion, without any cost or penalty.

 

We commenced a $0.6 million exploration drilling program inAs of December 31, 2018, no additional common stock had been sold to LPC under the first quarter 2016LPC Program following the initial sale of common stock pursuant to the Registered Purchase Agreement.  Subsequent to December 31, 2018 we sold an aggregate of approximately 745,000 common shares under the Commitment Purchase Agreement at an average price of $0.31 per common share for total proceeds of approximately $230,000 during the Santa Rosa vein in the San Luis del Cordero project in Durango State, Mexico.  The 20 hole, 4,600 meter drilling program was completed in June 2016, and we received drill results from that program in July.  Based on our evaluation of those July results, we concluded that further work on this project was not likelyyear to meet our near-term objectives and we terminated the farm-in arrangement for the property in August 2016.date period ended February 27, 2019.  

 

Results of Operations

 

For the results of operations discussed below, we compare the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20162018 to the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

 

Revenue from oxide plant lease. In July 2015 a third party leased our inactive Velardeña oxide plant. We recorded revenue of $6.4$7.2 million and $0.6$6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015 respectively. 2017 respectively from the lease of our Velardeña oxide plant to Hecla.

 

Oxide plant lease costs. During the yearyears ended December 31, 20162018 and 2017 we recorded $2.0$2.3 and $2.2 million, respectively of costs related to the oxide plant lease consisting primarily of reimbursable labor and utility costs which for accounting purposes were also included in revenue from the oxide plant lease. We recorded $0.2 million for such costs for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

Revenue from the sale

48


Table of metals.  We recorded no revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the suspension of mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties beginning November 2015. We recorded $7.4 million in revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015, all from the sale of lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates from our Velardeña Properties in Mexico.Contents

Costs of metals sold.  We recorded no cost of metals sold during the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the suspension of mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties beginning November 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded $9.9 million of costs of metals sold.

Exploration Expense.    Our exploration expense, including drillingwork at the San Luis del Cordero, Santa Maria and Rodeoother properties, property holding costs and allocated administrative expenses, totaled $3.7$3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.  For2018. Our exploration expense, including work at the Santa Maria, Mogotes and other properties, totaled $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 exploration expense totaled $3.6 million, including drilling at the Velardeña Properties.2017.  Exploration expense for both years was incurred primarily in Mexico and includes property holding costs, costs incurred by our local exploration offices, and allocated corporate administrative expenses.

Velardeña Project Expense.  During  Exploration expenses were higher in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 we incurred nil and approximately $0.1 million of expenses. The 2015 expenses were primarily related2018 compared to the restart of mining and processingprior period due to increased exploration activities in 2015 and the construction of the San Mateo rampat our Santa Maria and other mine construction and engineering work.  In addition to amounts expensed, we incurred only a nominal amount of capital expenditures during both 2016 and 2015.Mexico properties.

 

Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs.  We recorded $2.0$1.9 million and $1.2$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, for expenses related to shut down and care and maintenance at our Velardeña Properties. We suspendedProperties as the result of the suspension of mining and processing activities at the Velardeña Properties in November 2015. The higher care and maintenance costs in 2018 are related to increased maintenance.

 

El Quevar Project Expense.    During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 20152018 we incurred $0.5$1.3 million and $1.0 million of expenses, respectively, primarily related to holding and evaluation costs for the Yaxtché deposit at our El Quevar project in Argentina.  During the year ended December 31, 2017 we recorded an expense of approximately $0.8 million primarily related to holding costs for the Yaxtché deposit at our El Quevar project in Argentina.  The decreaseadditional spending in expense for the 2016 period is2018 was primarily related to the reversalcosts of an accrualpreparing the technical reports and preparing for Argentina equity tax originally

53


Table of Contents

recorded in 2015, resulting from an audit of certain prior years.exploration drilling. For both years, additional nominal costs incurred in Argentina and not related to the El Quevar project are included in “—Exploration Expense”, discussed above.

 

Administrative Expense.  Administrative expenses totaled $3.9$3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20162018 compared to $4.2$3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. Administrative expenses, including costs associated with being a public company, are incurred primarily by our corporate activities in support of the Velardeña Properties, El Quevar project and our exploration portfolio.  The $3.9$3.4 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 20162018 is comprised of $1.4$1.6 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $1.3$0.9 million of professional fees and $1.2$0.9 million of insurance, travel expenses, rents, utilities and other office costs. The $4.2$3.5 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 20152017 is comprised of $2.0$1.6 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $1.0$0.8 million of professional fees and $1.2$1.1 million of insurance, rents, travel expenses, utilities and other office costs.

 

Stock based compensation.  During the year ended December 31, 20162018 we incurred expense related to stock basedstock-based compensation in the amount of $0.6$0.2 million compared to $0.5$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. Stock based compensation varies from period to period depending on the number and timing of shares granted, the type of grant, the market value of the shares on the date of grant and other variables. The 2016 stock based2018 and 2017 stock-based compensation amount includes $0.3amounts include a $0.1 million reduction of expense and $0.1 million of expense, respectively, related to KELTIP grants made to two officers and the related fair value adjustments to the KELTIP liability (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 10-K for a discussion of KELTIP grants).

 

Reclamation and accretion expense.  During each of the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 we incurred $0.2 million of reclamation expense related to the accretion of an asset retirement obligation at the Velardeña Properties.

 

Impairment of long lived assets and goodwill.  We assess the recoverability of our property, plant and equipment and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. The continued negative operating margin and the suspension of mining and sulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties in early November 2015 were events that required an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties asset group at September 30, 2015. We completed an impairment analysis at September 30, 2015 and determined that our mineral and exploration properties at the Velardeña Properties were impaired (see Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements). As a result we recorded a $13.2 million impairment charge related to long-lived assets.  There were no such charges during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Other Operating Income, Net.    We recorded $5.1 million of other operating income for the year ended December 31, 2018, consisting of $4.0 million related to an option payment and the ultimate sale of our Celaya property, $0.7 million from payments received on our Zacatecas Properties and $0.4 million related to the sale of two non-strategic Mexican subsidiaries. We recorded other operating income of $1.8$2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $0.52017, including $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The net amounts for both years consist primarily of net gains recorded on the sales of certain fixed assets and non-strategic exploration properties.properties in Mexico and a $1.1 million VAT tax refund in Argentina.

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization.  During the year ended December 31, 20162018 we incurred depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $1.5$1.2 million compared to $4.5$1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. The decreaseincrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization in 2016expense during the 2018 period is primarily the result of the suspension of mining and processing activitiesincreased depreciation at our Velardeña Properties during November 2015.

Interest expense.  During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 we recorded approximately $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of interest expense related to the Sentient Loan.  The remaining Sentient Loan was fully converted in June 2016 and at December 31, 2016 we had no outstanding debt.

Interest and Other Income.  During the year ended December 31, 2016 we recorded approximately $0.4 million of interest and other income which included a refund of previously paid social security taxes in Mexico of approximately $0.4 million.  During the year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded approximately $3.1 million of interest and other income which included a $2.1 million reduction of a loss contingency liability related to foreign withholding taxes that the government could have asserted were owed by the Company, acting as withholding agent, on certain interest payments made to a third party. Interest and other income for 2015 also includes a refund of previously paid social security taxes in Mexico of approximately $0.8 million.Properties.

5449


 

Table of Contents

 

WarrantInterest and Other Income, (Loss).net. ForDuring the year ended December 31, 20162018 we recorded approximately $1.7$0.1 million of lossinterest and other income primarily related to an increase in the fair value of the liability for warrants to acquire the Company’s stock.  Formark-to-market gains on short-term investments. During the year ended December 31, 20152017 we recorded approximately $1.3 milliononly a nominal amount of income related to a decrease in the fair value of the liability recorded for the warrants.  The warrant liability was recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2016interest and 2015 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation method is discussed in detail in Note 13 of our consolidated financial statements.

Derivative Income (Loss).  The beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note represented an embedded derivative as defined by ASC 815. ASC 815 provides that a derivative instrument’s fair value must be bifurcated from the host contract and separately recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The Company used a third party consultant to value the embedded derivative in the Sentient Note employing a Monte Carlo type probability analysis, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The valuation method is discussed in detail in Note 13 of our consolidated financial statements. The derivative was recorded at fair value with subsequent mark-to-market changes in the value of the derivative recorded as income or loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the year ended December 31, 2016 we recorded a $0.8 million loss related to the fair value adjustment to the embedded derivative. For the year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded a $0.6 million gain related to the fair value adjustment.other income.   

 

Gain (Loss) on Foreign Currency.  We recorded a $0.1 million foreign currency loss in each of the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017. Foreign currency gains and losses are primarily related to the effect of currency fluctuations on monetary assets net of liabilities held by our foreign subsidiaries that are denominated in currencies other than US dollars.

 

Income Taxes.  We recorded no income tax expense or benefit for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.2018. We recorded $13,000 of income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to a Mexican subsidiary. 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At December 31, 20162018, our aggregate cash and cash equivalents totaled $2.6$3.3 million, $1.5 million lower thanequal to the $4.1$3.3 million in similar assets held at December 31, 2015.2017. The reductionDecember 31, 2018 balance is due in part from the following expenditures totaling $11.0 million:and cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2018.  Expenditures totaled $10.8 million from the following:

 

·

$3.73.9 million in exploration expenditures, including costs related to drillingwork at the San Luis del Cordero, Santa Maria and Rodeoother properties;

 

·

$2.01.9 million in shutdown and care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties;

 

·

$0.51.3 million in evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs at the El Quevar project;

 

·

$3.93.4 million in general and administrative expenses; and

 

·

$0.90.3 million fromrelated to an increase in working capital primarily related to a decreasethe reduction of $0.3 million in deferred revenue from the lease ofincome related to the oxide plant.plant lease.

 

The foregoing expenditures were offset by cash inflows of $9.5$10.8 million from the following:

 

·

$4.44.9 million of net operating margin received pursuant to the oxide plant lease (defined as oxide plant lease revenue less oxide plant lease costs);

 

·

$3.60.8 million, net of net proceeds received in a registered directcommitment fees and other offering ofrelated costs, from the Company’s common stock (discussed in more detail below);LPC Program;

55


Table of Contents

 

·

$1.14.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of our interests in the Celaya property to Electrum;

·

$0.7 million from the farm out of certain nonstrategic exploration properties and mining equipment;mineral claims to Santacruz; and

 

·

$0.4 million from a refundthe sale of previously paid social security taxestwo inactive subsidiaries in Mexico.

 

On February 11, 2016, Sentient converted approximately $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) pursuant to the Sentient Note into 23,355,000 shares of our common stock. See Note 10 in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for a full discussion of the Sentient Note. On June 10, 2016 Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1 million and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest under the Sentient Note into 4,011,740 shares of our common stock.  At December 31, 2016 we had no outstanding debt.

On May 6, 2016, we issued 8.0 million registered shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share in a registered direct offering resulting in gross proceeds of $4.0 million. We incurred costs and fees of approximately $0.4 million related to the Offering resulting in net proceeds of approximately $3.6 million.  In connection with the Offering, each investor received an unregistered warrant to purchase threequarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.75 per share and are exercisable beginning six months after the date of issuance and will expire five years from the initial exercise date.

On December 20, 2016, we entered into an at-the-market offering agreement with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC,  under which we may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of our common stock through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $5.0 million.  The common stock will be distributed at the market prices prevailing at the time of sale. The ATM Agreement provides that Wainwright will be entitled to compensation for its services at a commission rate of 2.0% of the gross sales price per share of common stock sold.  We reimbursed certain legal expenses of Wainwright totaling $50,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $103,000 in connection with establishing the ATM Program.  At December 31, 2016 no offers or sales were made under the ATM Program. 

Subsequent to December 31, 2016 we sold an aggregate of approximately 640,000 common shares under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.74 per common share for gross proceeds of approximately $475,000 during the year to date period ended February 24, 2017. We paid a 2% cash commission on the gross proceeds in the amount of approximately $10,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $2,000.

In addition to our $2.6the $3.3 million cash balance at December 31, 2016, during 20172018, we expect to receive approximately $4.8$4.6 million in net operating margin from the lease of the oxide plant $0.8 million fromduring the final payment for the August 2016 sale of excess mining equipment and $0.6 million from the farm out of a non-strategic exploration property that occurred in 2016.next twelve-month period ending December 31, 2019.  In addition, subsequent to December 31, 20162018 we received $0.5approximately $0.2 million in net proceeds from the sale of our common stock

50


Table of Contents

under the ATMLPC Program.  If no additional sales of common stock under the ATM Program occur, we project we would end 2017 with a cash balance of $1.5 million based on the following forecastedOur currently budgeted expenditures during 2017.the twelve months ending December 31, 2019 are as follows:

 

·

Approximately $1.8$2.0 million on exploration activities and property holding costs related to our portfolio of exploration properties located primarily in Mexico, including project assessment and developmentevaluation costs relating to Santa Maria, Rodeo,Yoquivo and other properties;

 

·

Approximately $1.5 million at the Velardeña Properties for care and maintenance;

 

·

Approximately $0.5$1.2 million at the El Quevar project to fund ongoing exploration and evaluation activities, care and maintenance activities and property holding costs;

56


Table of Contents

·

Approximately $3.5 million on general and administrative costs; and

 

·

Approximately $0.5$3.1 million on other working capital, primarily related to a decrease in accounts payable during the year.general and administrative costs.

If we spend the amounts described above, we would end 2019 with a cash balance of approximately zero.  However, we do not intend to allow our cash balance to drop below acceptable levels.  Therefore, during 2019 we intend to take appropriate actions, which may include sales of certain of our nonstrategic exploration assets, reductions to our currently budgeted level of spending, and/or raising additional equity capital through sales under the ATM Program, LPC Program or otherwise.

 

The actual amount of cash that we spendreceive or the expenditures that we incur during 2017the year ended 2019 and the projected yearend cash balance at December 31, 2019 may vary significantly from the amounts specified above and will depend on a number of factors, including variations from anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties and costs for continued exploration, project assessment, and development at our other exploration properties, including Santa Maria and Rodeo.El Quevar.  Moreover, revenues from the oxide plant lease may be less than anticipated, which would require further actions on our part in order to maintain sufficient cash balances at year end.   

 

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, our continuing long-term operations are dependent upon our ability to secure sufficient funding and to generate future profitable operations.  The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as property, plant and equipment in our consolidated financial statements are dependent on our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations and to continue to fund exploration and development activities that would lead to profitable mining activities or to generate proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in generating future profitable operations or securing additional funding in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all.  

In our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, we reported that material uncertainties, including repayment of the Sentient Loan, may have cast significant doubt on our ability to continue as a going concern.  During 2016, the Sentient Loan was fully converted to our common stock and additional cash proceeds were raised through the sale of nonstrategic exploration properties and mining equipment and from an offering of our common stock.  We believe the foregoing transactions and the continuing cash flow from the lease of the oxide plant, use of the ATM Program and priorLPC Program, and the potential for additional asset dispositions make it probable that we will have sufficient cash to meet our financial obligations and continue our business strategy beyond one year from the filing of our consolidated financial statements for the yearperiod ended December 31, 2016. 2018.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely used in the mining industry. Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), there is no standardized definition of cash cost, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver, and therefore our forecasted cash costs may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies.

The full year 2015 cash costs of $22.16 for the Velardeña Properties include all direct and indirect costs associated with the physical activities that would generate concentrate products for sale to customers, including mining to gain access to mineralized materials, mining of mineralized materials and waste, milling, third-party related treatment, refining and transportation costs, on-site administrative costs and royalties. Cash costs do not include depreciation, depletion, amortization, exploration expenditures, reclamation and remediation costs, sustaining capital, financing costs, income taxes, or corporate general and administrative costs not directly or indirectly related to the Velardeña Properties. By-product credits include revenues from gold, lead and zinc contained in the products sold to customers during the period. Cash costs, after by-product credits, are divided by the number of payable silver ounces generated by the plant for the period to arrive at cash costs, after by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver.

57


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver calculation:

Cash Costs, Net of By-product Credits,

Per Payable Ounce of Silver (1)

(in thousands except per unit amounts)

Year Ended December 31, 2015

Cash costs

$

9,363

Silver treatment and refining charges (included in sale of metals above)

778

By-product credits (included in sale of metals above)

Gold

(2,195)

Lead

16

Zinc

(724)

Cash costs, net of by-product credits (1)

$

7,238

Cash cost per unit

Payable silver ounces generated

326,651

Cash costs

$

28.66

Treatment and refining charges

2.38

By-product credits

(8.89)

Cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver (1)

$

22.16


(1)Cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver is a non-GAAP financial measure defined below.

We provide cash costs, after by-product credits to provide additional information regarding the performance of the Velardeña Properties, and believe the use of this measure provides investors with useful information about the underlying costs of our mining activities. Cash costs, after by-product credits, is an important statistic that the Company uses to measure the Velardeña Properties’ performance. It also allows us to benchmark the performance of the Velardeña Properties against those operations of our competitors. The statistic is also useful in identifying acquisition and investment opportunities since it provides a common tool for measuring the financial performance of other mines with varying geologic, metallurgical and mining and processing characteristics. No cash costs, after by-product credits were reported for the year ended December 31, 2016 as the result of the shutdown of mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties in November 2015

Cost of sales is the most comparable financial measure, calculated in accordance with GAAP, to cash costs. As compared to cash costs, cost of sales includes adjustments for changes in inventory and excludes net revenue from by-products and third-party related treatment, refining and transportation costs, which are reported as part of revenue in accordance with GAAP.

58


Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation for the year ended December 31, 2015 between the non-GAAP measure of cash cost, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver, to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, cost of metals sold.

Reconciliation of Costs of Metals Sold (GAAP)

to Cash Costs (Non-GAAP)

(in thousands)

Year Ended December 31, 2015

Cash costs

$

9,363

Reconciliation to GAAP

Change in inventory (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization)

503

Cost of metals sold

$

9,866

   

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The selection and application of accounting policies is an important process that has developed as our business activities have evolved and as the accounting rules have changed. Accounting rules generally do not involve a selection among alternatives, but involve an implementation and interpretation of existing rules, and the use of judgment, to the specific set of circumstances existing in our business. Discussed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue or expense being reported.

 

51


Table of Contents

Mineral Reserves

 

When and if we determine that a mineral property has proven and probable reserves, subsequent development costs are capitalized to mineral properties. When mineral properties are developed and operations commence, capitalized costs are charged to operations using the units-of-production method over proven and probable reserves. “Mineralized material” as used in this annual report, although permissible under SEC’s Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards, and therefore all development costs incurred by us are expensed when incurred. The Company cannot be certain that any part of the deposits at the Velardeña Properties or the Yaxtché deposit at the El Quevar project will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations

 

We record asset retirement obligations in accordance with Auditing Standards Codification (“ASC”) 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“ASC 410”), which establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. According to ASC 410, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. An offsetting asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated, and depreciated over the useful life of the asset.

 

Long Lived Assets

 

Long lived assets are recorded at cost and per the guidance of ASC 360 the Company assesses the recoverability of its long lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  If the sum of estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related asset, impairment is considered to exist. The related impairment loss is measured by

59


Table of Contents

comparing estimated future net cash flows on a discounted basis or by comparing other market indicators to the carrying amount of the asset.

 

Table of Contractual ObligationsObligation

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2016:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

More

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

More

 

 

 

 

Less Than

 

1 - 3

 

3 - 5

 

Than

 

 

 

 

Less Than

 

1 - 3

 

3 - 5

 

Than

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

1 Year

 

Years

 

Years

 

5 Years

 

 

Total

 

1 Year

 

Years

 

Years

 

5 Years

 

 

(in thousands of $)

 

 

(in thousands of $)

 

Operating leases(1)

 

1,149

 

285

 

589

 

275

 

 —

 

 

1,024

 

224

 

317

 

329

 

154

 

El Quevar and Velardeña concession and rights payments (2)

 

1,125

 

225

 

450

 

450

 

(3)

El Quevar and Velardeña concession payments(2)

 

700

 

140

 

280

 

280

 

(3)


(1)

The operating lease obligations are related to our corporate headquarters office in Golden, Colorado, which expires November 30, 2019,2024, as well as another office lease associated with our Velardeña Properties.

 

(2)

WeIn 2019 and subsequent years, we expect to make annual maintenance payments of approximately $75,000$80,000 to the Mexico federal government to maintain the Velardeña Properties concessions and $25,000$35,000 to maintain related surface rights under a contract with the local community ejido.  In 20172019 and subsequent years, we expect to pay approximately $115,000$60,000 per year to the Argentina federal government.government in order to maintain our El Quevar concessions.

52


Table of Contents

 

(3)

We cannot currently estimate the life of the Velardeña Properties or the El Quevar project. This table assumes that no annual maintenance payments will be made more than five years after December 31, 2016.2018. If we have mining and processing activities atcontinue to hold the Velardeña Properties concessions beyond five years, we expect that we would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $75,000$80,000 per year for the life of the Velardeña mine.Properties concessions. If we continue to construct a mine athold the El Quevar project,concessions beyond five years, we expect that we would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $115,000$60,000 per year for the life of the El Quevar mine.concessions.

 

From time to time we enter into lease or option agreements related to exploration properties that are of interest to us. These agreements typically contain escalating payments required to maintain our exploration rights to the property. Such agreements are not included in the above table because exploration success is historically low and we have the right to terminate the agreements at any time.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off balanceoff-balance sheet arrangements.

 

ITEM 7A:  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

We invest substantially all of our excess cash with high credit-quality financial institutions or in U.S. government and debt securities rated “investment grade” or better. The rates received on such investments may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash, restricted cash, investments and restricted investment balances outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, a 1.0% decrease in interest rates would have resulted in a reduction in interest income for the period of less than approximately $0.1 million.

60


Table of Contents

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

 

Although most of our expenditures are in U.S. dollars, certain purchases of labor, supplies and capital assets are denominated in other currencies. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our mining and exploration activities. To reduce this risk, we maintain minimum cash balances in foreign currencies and complete most of our purchases in U.S. dollars.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

We are primarily engaged in the exploration and mining of properties containing silver, gold, zinc, lead and other minerals. As a result, decreases in the price of any of these metals have the potential to negatively impact our ability to establish reserves and mine on our properties. For further detail regarding the effect on our expected cash flow from fluctuations in silver and gold prices, see “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.

 

ITEM 8:  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The consolidated financial statements and supplementary information filed as part of this Item 8 are listed under Part IV, Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules” and contained in this annual report on Form 10-K at page F-1.

53


Table of Contents

ITEM 9:  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A:  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

The management of Golden Minerals Company has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016.2018.

 

Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2018, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective and designed to provide reasonable assurance that (i) information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

The management of Golden Minerals, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

 

Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation

61


Table of Contents

of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2018. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2018, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 20162018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B:  OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

6254


 

Table of Contents

PART III

 

ITEM 10:  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

For Information regarding our executive officers, see “Items 1 and 2: Business and Properties—Executive Officers of Golden Minerals” and “Items 1 and 2: Business and Properties—Board of Directors of Golden Minerals.”

 

Additional information is incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and those of our officers performing similar functions. The full text of our code of ethics can be found on the Corporate Governance page on our website. In the event our Board of Directors approves an amendment to or waiver from any provision of our code of ethics, we will disclose the required information pertaining to such amendment or waiver on our website.

 

ITEM 11:  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

ITEM 12:  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

ITEM 13:  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

ITEM 14:  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

6355


 

Table of Contents

PART IV

 

ITEM 15:  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

a.

Documents filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:

 

(1)

Our consolidated financial statements are listed on the “Index to Financial Statements” on Page F-1F-1 to this report.

 

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements or related notes).

 

(3)

The following exhibits are filed with this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

6456


 

Table of Contents

ITEM 16: PREPARATION OF STATEMENT OR REPORT

 

Not applicable

 

EXHIBITS

 

 

 

 

Exhibit
Number

    

Description

1.1 

Underwriting Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated as of September 13, 2012.(1)

1.2 

Underwriting Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Roth Capital Partners, LLC, dated as of September 5, 2014.(11)

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company.(2)

 

 

 

3.2

 

First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company.(3)

 

 

 

3.3

 

Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company. (17)

 

3.4

 

Bylaws of Golden Minerals Company.(2)

 

 

 

4.1

 

Specimen of Common Stock Certificate.(4)

 

 

 

4.2

 

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A. dated as of September 19, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of March 7, 2014, as further amended by Amendment No. 2 dated as of May 2, 2016.(1) (16)

4.3 

Warrant by and between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of September 19, 2012.(1)

4.4 

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A. dated as of September 10, 2014 (Public Offering). (11)

 

 

 

4.5 4.3

 

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A. dated as of September 10, 2014 (Sentient Private Placement), as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of May 2, 2016. (12) (16)

4.4

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A., dated as of May 6, 2016. (16)

 

 

 

10.1

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement.(2)

 

 

 

10.2

 

Form of Change of Control Agreement.(2)

 

 

 

10.3

 

Amendment No. 1 to Change of Control Agreement.(5)

65


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description

 

 

 

10.4

 

Golden Minerals Company Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(6)

 

 

 

10.5

 

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(7)

 

 

 

10.6

 

Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan.(7)

 

 

 

10.7

 

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(8)

57


Table of Contents

 

 

 

10.8

 

Registration Rights Agreement by and among Golden Minerals Company, Sentient Global Resources Fund III, L.P., SGRF III Parallel I, L.P. and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of October 7, 2011.(9)

 

 

 

10.9

 

Registration Rights Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of September 19, 2012.(1)

 

 

 

10.10

 

Subscription Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of September 10, 2014.(12)

 

 

 

10.11

 

Registration Rights Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of September 10, 2014.(11)

 

 

 

10.12

 

Golden Minerals Company 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan.(10)

 

 

 

10.13

 

Master Agreement and Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2015, by and between Minera William S.A de C.V. and Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V., as amended by the First Amendment to Master Agreement and Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2016.2016, as further amended by the Second Amendment to the Master Agreement and Lease Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2017. (13) (21) (23)

 

 

 

10.14

 

Contract of Mining Exploration and Exploitation, dated as of November 13, 2015, by and between Minera William S.A. de C.V. and Minera Fumarola, S.A. de C.V,C.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Prospero Silver Corp. (14)

 

 

 

10.15

 

Registration Rights Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of February 11, 2016.(15)

 

 

 

10.16

 

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A., dated as of May 6, 2016. (16)

10.17 

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and certain institutional investors, dated as of May 2, 2016. (16)

 

 

 

66


Table of Contents

10.17

 

Exhibit
Number

Description

10.18 

Registration Rights Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of June 10, 2016. (18)

 

 

 

10.19 10.18

 

Assignment of Rights Agreement between Minera William, S.A. de C.V. and Golden Tag de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. dated as of August 2, 2016. (19)

 

 

 

10.20 10.19

 

Form of Unit Agreement Pursuant to the 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan. (20)

 

 

 

10.21 10.20

 

At the Market Offering Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2016, between Golden Minerals Company and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, as amended by the Amendment dated November 23, 2018. (22) (24)

58


10.21

Option Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2017, between Golden Minerals Company and Hecla Mining Company. (23)

10.22

Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2018 between Golden Minerals Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (Registered Purchase Agreement). (25)

10.23

Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2018 between Golden Minerals Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (Commitment Purchase Agreement). (25)

10.24

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2018 between Golden Minerals Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC. (22)(25)

10.25

Contract of Assignment of Rights, dated as of August 30, 2018, among Minera de Cordilleras, S. de R.L. de C.V., and Minera Adularia Exploracion, S. de R.L. de C.V. (26)

10.26

Assignment of Rights Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2018, among Minera de Cordilleras, S. de R.L. de C.V., and Minera Adularia Exploracion, S. de R.L. de C.V. (26)

 

 

 

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the Company.*

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of EKS&H LLLP.*

 

 

 

23.2

 

Consent of Tetra Tech.Plante Moran LLLP.*

 

 

 

23.3

 

Consent of RungePincockMinarco.Tetra Tech.*

23.4

Consent of Wood Group PLC *

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).*

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).*

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certificate of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).**

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document*

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Definition Document*

59


 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*


(1)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 19, 2012.

 

(2)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 30, 2009.

67


 

(3)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 9, 2011.

 

(4)

Incorporated by reference to our Form S-1/A Registration Statement filed November 16, 2009.

 

(5)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 28, 2013.

 

(6)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2014.

 

(7)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2009.

 

(8)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2010.

 

(9)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2011.

 

(10)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2013.

 

(11)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2014.

 

(12)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2014.

 

(13)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 20, 2015.

 

(14)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 18, 2015.

 

(15)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016.

 

(16)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2016.

 

(17)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2016.

 

(18)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016.

 

(19)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2016.

 

(20)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2016.

 

(21)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2016.

 

(22)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2016.

 

(23)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2017

60


(24)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 23, 2018.

(25)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2018.

(26)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 6, 2018.

*     Filed herewith.

**   Furnished herewith.

 

6861


 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

Dated: February 28, 20172019

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

 

Registrant

 

 

 

By:

/s/ WARREN M. REHN

 

 

Warren M. Rehn

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signature

    

Title

    

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ WARREN M. REHN

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

February 28, 20172019

Warren M. Rehn

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ ROBERT P. VOGELS

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

February 28, 20172019

Robert P. Vogels

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

February 28, 20172019

Jeffrey G. Clevenger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ W. DURAND EPPLER

 

Director

 

February 28, 20172019

W. Durand Eppler

/s/ IAN MASTERTON-HUME

Director

February 28, 2017

Ian Masterton-Hume

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ KEVIN R. MORANO

 

Director

 

February 28, 20172019

Kevin R. Morano

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ TERRY M. PALMER

 

Director

 

February 28, 20172019

Terry M. Palmer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ ANDREW N. PULLAR

 

Director

 

February 28, 20172019

Andrew N. Pullar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ DAVID H. WATKINS

 

Director

 

February 28, 20172019

David H. Watkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6962


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX

 

 

 

 

F-1


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Stockholdersof

Golden Minerals Company

Golden, Colorado

OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Golden Minerals Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015,2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows, for eachthe year ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the years then ended. Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BASIS FOR OPINION

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

/s/ EKS&H LLLP

March 1, 2018

Denver, Colorado

F-2


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Golden Minerals Company

Golden, Colorado

OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Golden Minerals Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018, the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BASIS FOR OPINION

The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The companyCompany is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An

Our audit also includesincluded performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Golden Minerals Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

 

 

 

    

EKS&H LLLP/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

 

 

 

February 28, 20172019

 

 

Denver, Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

F-2F-3


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4)

 

$

2,588

 

$

4,077

 

Short-term investments (Note 4)

 

 

334

 

 

72

 

Trade receivables

 

 

380

 

 

546

 

Inventories (Note 6)

 

 

245

 

 

330

 

Value added tax receivable, net (Note 7)

 

 

5

 

 

400

 

Related party receivable (Note 23)

 

 

643

 

 

 —

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 5)

 

 

578

 

 

451

 

Total current assets

 

 

4,773

 

 

5,876

 

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 8)

 

 

9,235

 

 

11,125

 

Total assets

 

$

14,008

 

$

17,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 9)

 

$

1,224

 

$

1,144

 

Convertible note payable - related party, net (Note 10)

 

 

 —

 

 

3,702

 

Derivative liability - related party (Note 10)

 

 

 —

 

 

488

 

Deferred revenue (Note 16)

 

 

 —

 

 

500

 

Other current liabilities (Note 12)

 

 

24

 

 

556

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

1,248

 

 

6,390

 

Asset retirement and reclamation liabilities (Note 11)

 

 

2,434

 

 

2,546

 

Warrant liability - related party (Note 13)

 

 

976

 

 

117

 

Warrant liability (Note 13)

 

 

922

 

 

93

 

Other long term liabilities (Note 12)

 

 

66

 

 

84

 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,646

 

 

9,230

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 and 100,000,000 shares authorized; 89,020,041 and 53,335,333 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

889

 

 

534

 

Additional paid in capital

 

 

495,455

 

 

484,742

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(488,037)

 

 

(477,378)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

55

 

 

(127)

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

8,362

 

 

7,771

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

14,008

 

$

17,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 5)

 

$

3,293

 

$

3,250

 

Short-term investments (Note 5)

 

 

330

 

 

238

 

Lease receivables

 

 

481

 

 

314

 

Inventories, net (Note 7)

 

 

229

 

 

242

 

Value added tax receivable, net (Note 8)

 

 

14

 

 

148

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 6)

 

 

1,188

 

 

745

 

Total current assets

 

 

5,535

 

 

4,937

 

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 9)

 

 

7,109

 

 

8,140

 

Total assets

 

$

12,644

 

$

13,077

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 10)

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,556

 

Deferred revenue, current (Note 16)

 

 

293

 

 

293

 

Other current liabilities (Note 10)

 

 

12

 

 

 9

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

2,007

 

 

1,858

 

Asset retirement and reclamation liabilities (Note 11)

 

 

2,683

 

 

2,495

 

Deferred revenue, non-current (Note 16)

 

 

307

 

 

600

 

Other long term liabilities

 

 

10

 

 

43

 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,007

 

 

4,996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 95,620,796 and 91,929,709 shares issued and outstanding respectively

 

 

955

 

 

919

 

Additional paid in capital

 

 

517,806

 

 

516,284

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(511,124)

 

 

(509,082)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

 —

 

 

(40)

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

7,637

 

 

8,081

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

12,644

 

$

13,077

 

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3F-4


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

  

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands except per share data)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant lease (Note 16)

 

$

6,400

 

$

653

 

Sale of metals (Note 16)

 

 

 —

 

 

7,418

 

Total revenue

 

 

6,400

 

 

8,071

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant lease costs (Note 16)

 

 

(2,046)

 

 

(199)

 

Cost of metals sold (exclusive of depreciation shown below) (Note 17)

 

 

 —

 

 

(9,866)

 

Exploration expense

 

 

(3,718)

 

 

(3,634)

 

El Quevar project expense

 

 

(508)

 

 

(1,042)

 

Velardeña project expense

 

 

 —

 

 

(119)

 

Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs

 

 

(2,016)

 

 

(1,228)

 

Administrative expense

 

 

(3,890)

 

 

(4,242)

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

(593)

 

 

(453)

 

Reclamation expense

 

 

(192)

 

 

(256)

 

Impairment of long lived assets

 

 

 —

 

 

(13,181)

 

Other operating income, net (Note 8)

 

 

1,790

 

 

471

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

 

(1,548)

 

 

(4,480)

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

(12,721)

 

 

(38,229)

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(6,321)

 

 

(30,158)

 

Other income and (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense (Note 10)

 

 

(515)

 

 

(126)

 

Interest and other income (Note 17)

 

 

390

 

 

3,083

 

Warrant derivative (loss) gain (Note 18)

 

 

(1,688)

 

 

1,344

 

Derivative (loss) gain (Note 18)

 

 

(778)

 

 

553

 

Loss on debt extinguishment (Note 10)

 

 

(1,653)

 

 

 —

 

Loss on foreign currency

 

 

(94)

 

 

(79)

 

Total other (expense) income

 

 

(4,338)

 

 

4,775

 

Loss from operations before income taxes

 

 

(10,659)

 

 

(25,383)

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net loss

 

$

(10,659)

 

$

(25,383)

 

Comprehensive loss, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities

 

 

182

 

 

(127)

 

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(10,477)

 

$

(25,510)

 

Net loss per common share — basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss

 

$

(0.13)

 

$

(0.48)

 

Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic (1)

 

 

81,651,896

 

 

52,972,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

  

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands except per share data)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant lease (Note 16)

 

$

7,217

 

$

6,691

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant lease costs (Note 16)

 

 

(2,289)

 

 

(2,189)

 

Exploration expense

 

 

(3,909)

 

 

(3,091)

 

El Quevar project expense

 

 

(1,266)

 

 

(822)

 

Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs

 

 

(1,889)

 

 

(1,589)

 

Administrative expense

 

 

(3,355)

 

 

(3,512)

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

(226)

 

 

(296)

 

Reclamation expense

 

 

(210)

 

 

(196)

 

Other operating income, net (Notes 8 and 9)

 

 

5,138

 

 

2,093

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(1,171)

 

 

(952)

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

(9,177)

 

 

(10,554)

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

(1,960)

 

 

(3,863)

 

Other income and (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other (expense) income, net (Note 17)

 

 

112

 

 

37

 

Loss on foreign currency

 

 

(84)

 

 

(53)

 

Total other income (loss)

 

 

28

 

 

(16)

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

 

(1,932)

 

 

(3,879)

 

Income tax

 

 

(13)

 

 

(13)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,945)

 

$

(3,892)

 

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities (Note 5)

 

 

 —

 

 

(95)

 

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

$

(1,945)

 

$

(3,987)

 

Net income (loss) per common share — basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss

 

$

(0.02)

 

$

(0.04)

 

Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic (1)

 

 

94,003,165

 

 

90,468,606

 


(1)

Potentially dilutive shares have not been included because to do so would be anti-dilutive

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4F-5


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Comprehensive

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit

 

Income (loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

(in thousands except share data)

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

53,162,833

 

$

532

 

$

484,197

 

$

(451,995)

 

$

 —

 

$

32,734

 

Stock compensation accrued

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

453

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

453

 

KELTIP mark-to-market

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

40

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

40

 

KELTIP shares issued

 

172,500

 

 

2

 

 

52

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

54

 

Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities, net of tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(127)

 

 

(127)

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,383)

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,383)

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

53,335,333

 

$

534

 

$

484,742

 

$

(477,378)

 

$

(127)

 

$

7,771

 

Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards

 

317,968

 

 

2

 

 

250

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

252

 

Shares issued on conversion of Sentient Note (Note 10)

 

27,366,740

 

 

273

 

 

6,944

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,217

 

Registered offering common stock, net and warrants (Note 15)

 

8,000,000

 

 

80

 

 

3,519

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,599

 

Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities, net of tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

182

 

 

182

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(10,659)

 

 

 —

 

 

(10,659)

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

89,020,041

 

$

889

 

$

495,455

 

$

(488,037)

 

$

55

 

$

8,362

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Comprehensive

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit

 

Income (loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

(in thousands except share data)

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

89,020,041

 

$

889

 

$

495,455

 

$

(488,037)

 

$

55

 

$

8,362

 

Cumulative adjustment related to change in accounting principle (Note 4)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

19,046

 

 

(17,148)

 

 

 —

 

 

1,898

 

Adjusted balance at January 1, 2017

 

89,020,041

 

$

889

 

$

514,501

 

$

(505,185)

 

$

55

 

$

10,260

 

Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards

 

200,000

 

 

 1

 

 

196

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

197

 

Shares issued under the at-the-market offering agreement, net (Note 15)

 

1,024,392

 

 

10

 

 

671

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

681

 

Consideration shares sold to Hecla, net (Notes 15 and 16)

 

1,811,015

 

 

18

 

 

912

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

930

 

Cancellation of treasury shares (Note 15)

 

(125,739)

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Deemed dividend on warrants (Note 4)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 5

 

 

(5)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities, net of tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(95)

 

 

(95)

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,892)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,892)

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

91,929,709

 

$

919

 

$

516,284

 

$

(509,082)

 

$

(40)

 

$

8,081

 

Cumulative adjustment related to change in accounting principle (Note 4)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(89)

 

 

40

 

 

(49)

 

Adjusted balance at January 1, 2018

 

91,929,709

 

$

919

 

$

516,284

 

$

(509,171)

 

$

 —

 

$

8,032

 

Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards

 

537,279

 

 

 4

 

 

312

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

316

 

Registered direct purchase agreement, net (Note 15)

 

3,153,808

 

 

32

 

 

1,202

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,234

 

Deemed dividend on warrants (Note 4)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 8

 

 

(8)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,945)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,945)

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

95,620,796

 

$

955

 

$

517,806

 

$

(511,124)

 

$

 —

 

$

7,637

 

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5F-6


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities (Note 19)

 

$

(6,205)

 

$

(9,935)

 

Net cash used in operating activities (Note 18)

 

$

(5,711)

 

$

(1,630)

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

 

1,167

 

 

789

 

 

 

5,097

 

 

762

 

Capitalized costs and acquisitions of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(50)

 

 

(44)

 

Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(152)

 

 

(81)

 

Net cash from investing activities

 

$

1,117

 

$

745

 

 

$

4,945

 

$

681

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

3,599

 

 

 —

 

 

 

809

 

 

1,611

 

Proceeds from the issuance of convertible note

 

 

 —

 

 

5,000

 

Convertible note costs

 

 

 —

 

 

(312)

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

$

3,599

 

$

4,688

 

 

$

809

 

$

1,611

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(1,489)

 

 

(4,502)

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

43

 

 

662

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

4,077

 

 

8,579

 

 

 

3,250

 

 

2,588

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

2,588

 

$

4,077

 

 

$

3,293

 

$

3,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Non-cash transactions

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

F-6F-7


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

1.Nature of Operations

 

The Company is a mining company, holding a 100% interest in the Velardeña and Chicago precious metals mining properties and associated oxide and sulfide processing plants in Mexico (the “Velardeña Properties”).  During November 2015 the Company suspended mining and sulfide processing activities at its Velardeña Properties in order to conserve the asset until the Company is able to develop mining and processing plans that at then current prices for silver and gold indicate a sustainable positive operating margin (defined as revenues less costs of sales) or the Company is able to locate, acquire and develop alternative mineral sources that could be economically mined and transported to the Velardeña Properties for processing.  The Company has placed the mine and sulfide processing plant on care and maintenance to enable a re-start of either the mine or mill when mining and processing plans and metals prices support a cash positive outlook.  The Company incurred approximately $1.2$1.9 million in related shutdown costs for employee severance, net working capital obligations, and other shutdown expenditures to place the property on care and maintenance in the fourth quarter 2015 and $2.0$1.6 million in shutdown and care and maintenance costs for the yearyears ended December 30, 2018 and December 31, 2016 and2017, respectively.  On an ongoing basis, the Company expects to incur approximately $0.4 million in quarterly holdingcare and maintenance costs while mining and processing remain suspended.

The Company has retained a core group of employees at the Velardeña Properties, most of whom have been assigned to operate and provide administrative support for the oxide plant, which is leased to a third partysubsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (“Hecla”) and not affected by the shutdown.  The oxide plant began processing material for the third party in mid-December 2015, and the Company received net cash flow under the lease of approximately $4.4 million in 2016.  The third party has the right to extend the lease through December 31, 2018. The retained employees also include an exploration group and an operations and administrative group to continue to advance the Company’s plans in Mexico, oversee corporate compliance activities, and to maintain and safeguard the longer term value of the Velardeña Properties assets.

The Velardeña oxide plant began processing material for Hecla in mid-December 2015, and the Company recorded net operating margin under the lease of approximately $4.9 million in 2018.  On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease through December 31, 2018. On August 2, 2017, the Company granted Hecla an additional option, to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 in exchange for a $1.0 million cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock, issued at par at a price of $0.55 per share, based on an undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price (see Note 15).  On October 1, 2018, Hecla exercised this option to extend the lease through December 31, 2020. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease with 120 days’ notice.

 

The Company remains focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, and particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our processing plants at the Velardeña Properties. The Company is also focused on advancing our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina and on advancing selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 12 properties, located primarily in Mexico.  The Company is also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico. The Company is continuing its exploration efforts on selected properties in its portfolio of approximately 10 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico.  The Company also continues to hold its El Quevar advanced exploration property in Argentina on care and maintenance until it can fund further exploration or find a partner to further fund exploration.

 

The Company is considered an exploration stage company under the criteria set forth by the SEC as the Company has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves, as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7, at the Velardeña Properties, or any of the Company’s other properties.  As a result, and in accordance with GAAP for exploration stage companies, all expenditures for exploration and evaluation of the Company’s properties are expensed as incurred. As such, the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that do have proven and probable mineral reserves.  Such companies would typically capitalize certain development costs including infrastructure development and mining activities to access the ore. The capitalized costs would be amortized on a units-of-production basis as reserves are mined. The amortized costs are typically allocated to inventory and eventually to cost of sales as the inventories are sold.  As the Company does not have proven and probable reserves, substantially all expenditures at the Company’s Velardeña Properties for mine construction activity, as well as costs associated with the mill facilities, and for items that do not have a readily identifiable market value apart from the mineralized material, have

F-8


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

been expensed as incurred. Such costs are charged to cost of metals sold or project expense during the period depending on the nature of the costs. Certain of the costs may be reflected in inventories prior to the sale of the product. The term “mineralized material” as used herein, although permissible under SEC Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. The Company cannot be certain that any deposits at the Velardeña Properties or any other exploration property will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.

 

2. Liquidity

At December 31, 2018, the Company’s aggregate cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.3 million, equal to the $3.3 million in similar assets held at December 31, 2017. The December 31, 2018 balance is due in part from the following expenditures and cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2018.  Expenditures totaled $10.8 million from the following:

·

$3.9 million in exploration expenditures, including work at the Santa Maria and other properties;

·

$1.9 million in care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties;

·

$1.3 million in evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs at the El Quevar project;

·

$3.4 million in general and administrative expenses; and

·

$0.3 million related to an increase in working capital primarily related to the reduction of $0.3 million in deferred income related to the oxide plant lease.

The foregoing expenditures were offset by cash inflows of $10.8 million from the following:

·

$4.9 million of net operating margin received pursuant to the oxide plant lease (defined as oxide plant lease revenue less oxide plant lease costs);

·

$0.8 million, net of commitment fees and other offering related costs, from the LPC Program;

·

$4.0 million from the sale of our interests in the Celaya property to Electrum;

·

$0.7 million from the farm out of certain nonstrategic mineral claims to Santacruz; and

·

$0.4 million from the sale of two inactive subsidiaries in Mexico.

In addition to the $3.3 million cash balance at December 31, 2018, the Company expects to receive approximately $4.6 million in net operating margin from the lease of the oxide plant during the next twelve-month period ending December 31, 2019.  In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018 the Company received approximately $0.2 million

F-7F-9


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

2.Impairmentfrom the sale of Long Lived Assetsour common stock under the LPC Program.  The Company’s currently budgeted expenditures during the twelve months ending December 31, 2019 are as follows:

 

·

Approximately $2.0 million on exploration activities and property holding costs related to our portfolio of exploration properties located primarily in Mexico, including project assessment and evaluation costs relating to Yoquivo and other properties;

·

Approximately $1.5 million at the Velardeña Properties for care and maintenance;

·

Approximately $1.2 million at the El Quevar project to fund ongoing exploration and evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs; and

·

Approximately $3.1 million on general and administrative costs.

If the Company spends the amounts described above, it would end 2019 with a Properties Asset Groups – 2015 Impairmentcash balance of approximately zero.  However, the Company does not intend to allow its cash balance to drop below acceptable levels.  Therefore, during 2019 the Company intends to take appropriate actions, which may include sales of certain of the Company’s nonstrategic exploration assets, reductions to the Company’s currently budgeted level of spending, and/or raising additional equity capital through sales under the ATM Program, LPC Program or otherwise.

 

The Velardeña Properties consistsactual amount of two separate asset groups, one involvingcash that we receive or the oxide plant, which has been leased to a third party,expenditures that the Company incurs during the year ended 2019 and the other involvingprojected cash balance at December 31, 2019 may vary significantly from the mineralamounts specified above and exploration properties, sulfide plant,will depend on a number of factors, including variations from anticipated care and mining and other equipment and working capital related to the mining and processing activitiesmaintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties (the ”Mineral Properties Asset Group”). Perand costs for continued exploration, project assessment, and development at the guidanceCompanys’ other exploration properties, including El Quevar.  Moreover, revenues from the oxide plant lease may be less than anticipated, which would require further actions on the Company’s part in order to maintain sufficient cash balances at year end.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of ASC 360, “Property, Plantbusiness.  However, the Company’s continuing long-term operations are dependent upon its ability to secure sufficient funding and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), the Company assesses theto generate future profitable operations.  The underlying value and recoverability of its long-lived assets, includingthe amounts shown as property, plant and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  Mining and processing activities generated negative operating margin through September 30, 2015.  Ongoing efforts during 2015 to improve the grade of mined material delivered to the sulfide plant for processing by limiting dilution in the stopes did not improve grades to a level sufficientCompany’s consolidated financial statements are dependent on its ability to generate positive operating margins at 2015 metals prices.  As a result,cash flows from operations and to continue to fund exploration and development activities that would lead to profitable mining activities or to generate proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment.

There can be no assurance that the Company suspended mining and processing activities atwill be successful in generating future profitable operations or securing additional funding in the Velardeña mine and sulfide plant during November 2015 (see Note 1). 

The continued negative operating margin and the suspension of mining and sulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties during November 2015 were events that required an assessment of the recoverability of the Mineral Properties Asset Group at September 30, 2015. Per the guidance of ASC 360, recoverability of an asset group is not achieved if the projected undiscounted, pre-tax cash flows relatedfuture on terms acceptable to the asset group are less than its carrying amount. In its analysis of projected cash flows for the Mineral Properties Asset Group, the Company determined that the Mineral Properties Asset Group was impaired. As a result,or at September 30, 2015 the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $13.2 million to arrive at a remaining book value for the Mineral Properties Asset Group of $3.7 million at September 30, 2015, as shown in the table below.

To determine whether the Mineral Properties Asset Group was impaired at September 30, 2015 the Company used a cash flow valuation approach, which the Company deemed reasonable under the circumstances, that considered metals price projections using a greater weighting of current prices.  Based on the metals price projections and current operating experience for silver and gold grades, recoveries, and mining and processing costs, total projected net cash flow from mining and processing activities was negative, requiring that each of the individual components of the Mineral Properties Asset Group be written down to fair value.  

The Mineral Properties Asset Group includes the mineral and exploration properties associated with the mining and sulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties.  The discounted cash flow analysis performed by the Company implies a zero value for the mineral and exploration properties from mining and processing activities in the current economic environment, but the Company believes those properties have a residual value that could be realized from a sale to a third party.  With assistance from a third-party mining consulting and engineering firm, in reviewing comparable sales of similar properties in the region and considering the location of the Company’s properties to other active mining operations in close proximity to the Company’s properties, the Company concluded that the mineral and exploration properties included in the Mineral Properties Asset Group had a fair value of $1.4 million at September 30, 2015.

The tangible assets included in the Mineral Properties Asset Group, which includes buildings, plant and equipment, were separately analyzed by a third party valuation firm in 2013 using available market data to determine a fair value based on the net realizable value that could be received in a sale to a third party. The market data was derived by researching the secondary equipment market on sales and/or offers for sale of similar assets. The Mineral Properties Asset Group tangible assets were determined to have a fair value of approximately $6.0 million as of June 30, 2013, and have since been further depreciated, reflecting a current net book value of approximately $3.2 million as of September 30, 2015.all.  The Company believes the current net book value of the Mineral Properties Asset Group tangible assets did not

F-8


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

exceed fair value at September 30, 2015.  The assets continue to be used or held in condition for use to support future profitable operationscontinuing cash flow from the acquisition, exploration and development of other mineral sources located near the Velardeña Properties.

The following table details the components of the impairment of the Mineral Properties Asset Group:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Net Book Value

    

 

 

    

Net Book Value

    

 

 

Prior to

 

Sept. 30, 2015

 

After

 

 

 

Impairment at

 

Impairment

 

Impairment at

 

 

 

Sept. 30, 2015

 

Charges

 

Sept. 30, 2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral and exploration properties

 

$

13,660

 

$

12,306

 

$

1,354

 

Exploration properties

 

 

458

 

 

458

 

 

 —

 

Buildings, plant and equipment

 

 

3,236

 

 

 —

 

 

3,236

 

Asset retirement cost

 

 

417

 

 

417

 

 

 —

 

Other working capital, net

 

 

(872)

 

 

 —

 

 

(872)

 

 

 

$

16,899

 

$

13,181

 

$

3,718

 

Prior to assessing the recoverability of the assets comprising the Mineral Properties Asset Group, the Company also assessed the fair value of its material and supplies inventory at September 30, 2015, which is included in the Mineral Properties Asset Group.  Because of the suspension of mining and processing activities at the Velardeña Properties, as noted above, a portion of the material and supplies inventory is expected to be sold at a discount to its pre-shutdown book value or to decline in value prior to its use in future mining and processing activities.  As a result, the Company increased its reserve for obsolescence of the materials and supplies inventory and recorded a noncash charge to shut down costs of approximately $0.4 million at September 30, 2015. At December 31, 2015, the Company re-evaluated its material and supplies inventory taking into account consumption and purchases during the quarter and reduced the reserve for obsolescence by approximately $0.1 million.

Because of the close proximity of the asset group involving the oxide plant (the “Oxide Plant Asset Group”) the Company also assessed the recoverability of the Oxide Plant Asset Group at September 30, 2015.  The Oxide Plant Asset Group, which has been leased to a third party, consists primarilylease of the oxide plant, facilities with a carrying value at September 30, 2015use of $1.3 million.  The projected netthe ATM Program and LPC Program, and the potential for additional asset dispositions make it probable that the Company will have sufficient cash flowsto meet its financial obligations and continue its business strategy beyond one year from the lease are in excessfiling of the carrying value ofCompany’s consolidated financial statements for the Oxide Plant Asset Group and the Company therefore determined that the Oxide Plant Asset Group was not impaired.

The market approach used in the determination of fair value falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) (see Note 13) and relied upon a review of comparable sales of similar properties in the region and considered the location of the Company's properties to other active mining operations in close proximity to the Company's properties.

The Company evaluated its remaining long lived assets atperiod ended December 31, 2016 and determined that no further impairment was required.2018.

 

 

 

3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date

F-9F-10


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineralized material and related future metals prices that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of-productioncalculations; depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; environmental reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable metals in stockpiles; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets and the fair value of financial instruments. The Company based its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

The policies adopted, considered by management to be significant, are summarized as follows:

 

a.Basis of consolidation

 

All of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries are 100% owned and as such the Company does not have a noncontrolling interest in any of its subsidiaries.  All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated at consolidation.

 

b.Translation of foreign currencies

 

Substantially all expenditures and sales are made in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the Company and its subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional and reporting currency. 

 

c.Cash and cash equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

d.Inventories

Metals inventory at the Velardeña Properties consisted of marketable products including concentrates and precipitates.  Metals inventory was carried at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on spot and futures metals prices through estimated sale and settlement dates, less the estimated costs to complete processing and bring the product to sale. Costs included in metals inventory included direct and indirect costs of mining and processing, including depreciation. The Company had no metals inventories at December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively as the result of the suspension of operations at its Velardeña Properties during November 2015 (see Note 1).    

 

Materials and supplies inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Cost includes applicable taxes and freight. The Company routinely counts and evaluates its material and supplies to determine the existence of any obsolete stock that is subject to impairment (see Note 2).impairment.

 

e. Mining properties, exploration and development costs

 

The Company expenses general prospecting costs and the costs of acquiring and exploring unevaluated mineral properties. When a mineral property is determined to have proven and probable reserves, subsequent development costs are capitalized to mineral properties.  For acquired mineral properties with proven and probable reserves, the Company capitalizes acquisition costs and subsequent development costs.  When mineral properties are developed and operations

F-10


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

commence, capitalized costs are charged to operations using the units-of-production method over proven and probable reserves. Upon abandonment or sale of a mineral property, all capitalized costs relating to the specific property are written off in the period abandoned or sold and a gain or loss is recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

As discussed in Note 1, the Company is considered an exploration stage company under the criteria set forth by the SEC since it has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at the Velardeña Properties, or any of the Company’s other properties. As such, during the periods prior to November 2016 when the Company expensessuspended mining and processing activities, the

F-11


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Company expensed costs as incurred related to the extraction of mineralized material at itsthe Velardeña Properties. The Company established a cost basis for the mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties as a result of purchase accounting for the Company’s business combination transaction with ECU Silver Mining Inc. (“ECU”) in September 2011, the transaction pursuant to which the Company acquired the Velardeña Properties. Mineral properties acquired in the ECU merger were recorded at estimated fair market value based on valuations performed with the assistance of an independent appraisal firm and a minerals engineering company. Although the Company has not demonstrated the existence of proven and probable reserves, and the Company has not completed a pre-feasibility economic assessment, the Company had established the existence of mineralized material that was used in assigning value to mineral properties for purchase accounting purposes. The subsequent extraction of this mineralized material has provided a reasonable basis for the calculation of units-of-production depreciation for the cost basis in the mineral properties.

 

On a quarterly basis the Company evaluates its exploration properties to determine if they meet the Company’s minimum requirements for continued evaluation.  The rights to the properties that do not meet the minimum requirements are relinquished and the carrying values, if any, are written off and reflected in “Other operating income, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  Costs of exploration subsequent to the application of fresh start accounting have been and will continue to be expensed. 

 

f.Property, plant and equipment and long lived asset impairment

 

Buildings are depreciated using the straight–line method over the estimated useful lives of 30 to 40 years or the life of the mine whichever is shorter.  Mining equipment and machinery, excluding the plant, are depreciated using the straight-line method over useful lives of three to eight years or the lease period, whichever is shorter.  Mineral properties and the plant are depreciated using units of production based on estimated mineralized material.  Other furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to five years. Depreciation on plant and equipment used in the construction of an asset is capitalized to the constructed asset.

 

As discussed above, the Company does not have any properties with proven or probable reserves including the Velardeña Properties.reserves.

 

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and per the guidance of ASC 360 the Company assesses the recoverability of its property, plant and equipment, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  If the sum of estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related asset, impairment is considered to exist. The related impairment loss is measured by comparing estimated future net cash flows on a discounted basis or by comparing other market indicators to the carrying amount of the asset (see Notes 2 and 8).asset.

 

F-11


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)The Company evaluated its remaining long lived assets at December 31, 2017 and 2018, and determined that no impairment was required.

 

g.Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company records asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) in accordance with ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“ASC 410”), which establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. According to ASC 410, the fair value of an ARO is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. An offsetting asset retirement cost (“ARC”) is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated, and depreciated over the useful life of the asset (see Note 11).

 

The Company prepares estimates of the timing and amount of expected cash flows when an ARO is incurred. The fair value of the ARO is measured by discounting the expected cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the credit

F-12


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

adjusted risk-free rate of interest. The Company records the fair value of an ARO when it is incurred and layer adjustments of the ARO are recorded as an adjustment to the corresponding ARC. The ARO is adjusted to reflect the passage of time (accretion cost) calculated by applying the discount rate implicit in the initial fair value measurement to the beginning-of-period carrying amount of the ARO. The Company records accretion costs to expense as incurred.

 

h.Revenue Recognition

 

Following the guidance of ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605”), the Company recognizes “Revenue from the sale of metals” at the earliest point that both risk of loss and title transfer to the purchaser pursuant to the terms of the Company’s sales agreements. Prices for concentrate and precipitate sales are fixed according to terms included in the sales agreements, which generally call for final pricing based on average metals prices observed over specific periods that range from 10 days prior to the transfer of title to the month following the month the product is received by the purchaser.  Revenue is recorded based on estimated metals contained in the product from assay data and using either actual or projected prices for the pricing period specified in the sales agreement.  Upon final settlement revenue may be adjusted for changes in actual contained metals and final metals prices.

The Company recognizes oxide plant lease fees and reimbursements for labor, utility and other costs as "Revenue from Oxide plant lease" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss following the guidance of ASC 605606 regarding "income statement characterization of reimbursements received for "out-of-pocket" expenses incurred" and "reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent". ASC 605606 supports recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses in situations where the recipient is the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense. The actual costs incurred for the reimbursed labor, utility and other costs are reported as "Oxide plant lease costs" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company recognizes lease fees during the period theas fees are earned per the terms of the lease (see Note 16).

 

iStock compensation

 

Stock based compensation costs are recognized per the guidance of ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award (see Note 15).  Stock grants are valued at their grant date at fair value which in the case of options requires the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Per ASC 718 the grants may be classified as equity grants or liability grants depending on the terms of the grant.

 

F-12


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

j.Net income (loss) per Share of Common Stock

 

Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to holders of the Company’s Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue Common Stock were exercised or converted into Common Stock.

 

At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, all potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because to include them would have been anti-dilutive.

 

k.Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as all changes in equity (deficit), exclusive of transactions with stockholders, such as capital investments.  Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and changes in certain assets and liabilities that are reported directly in equity.  For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 20152017 Comprehensive loss included the change in the market value of available for sale securities and is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.Income (Loss).

 

As the result of a 2018 change in accounting principle, discussed in Note 4, the Company now records the changes in readily determinable fair values of equity investments through net income. Accordingly, no amounts were recorded to Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018. 

F-13


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

l.Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), on a tax jurisdictional basis.  The Company files United States and certain other foreign country income tax returns, and pays taxes reasonably determined to be due.  The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation.  The Company’s income tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved.  In accordance with ASC 740, the Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is a less than more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld when reviewed by the relevant taxing authority.  Such positions are deemed to be unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding liability is established on the balance sheet.

 

The Company classifies income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense.

 

m.Recently Adopted Standards

 

In April 2015,During the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, “Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”).  The purpose of the standard update is to simplify presentation of debt issuance costs. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Amortization of the discount or premium shall be reported as interest expense in the case of liabilities or as interest income in the case of assets. Amortization of debt issuance costs also shall be reported as interest expense. ASU No. 2015-03 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted andfirst quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU 2015-03 in 2015. The adoptionNo. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of this standard did notFinancial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”), which amended its accounting treatment for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of certain financial assets. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments that have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or resultsreadily determinable fair value to be measured at fair value through net income. Previously, entities would recognize changes in fair value of operations.

On August 27, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties aboutavailable-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income and would recognize in net income impairment losses that were other-than-temporary.  There will no longer be an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU

F-13


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressedavailable-for-sale classification (with changes in United States dollars)

2014‑15”).  ASU 2014-15 will require management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued on both an interim and annual basis. Management is required to provide certain footnote disclosures if it concludes that substantial doubt exists or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.fair value reported in other comprehensive income) for equity securities with readily determinable fair values.  The Company adoptedrecognized retrospectively the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-15 in 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014‑15 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2014 the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”)2016-01 (see Note 4). ASU 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations will be presented as discontinued operations. Additionally, ASU 2014-08 requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 became effective for the Company January 1, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2014‑08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

n.Recently Issued Pronouncements

In March 2016,During the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including accounting for income taxes and classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.  Forfirst quarter 2018 the Company ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company does not anticipate early adoption of ASU 2016-09. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09 to materially change its current accounting methods and therefore the Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issuedadopted ASU 2016-08,  “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies principal versus agent when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requires an entity to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (i.e., the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (i.e., the entity is an agent). For the Company, ASU 2016-08 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. As the Company’s current accounting practices per the guidance of ASC 605 are comparable to the requirementsThe adoption of ASU 2016-08 during the Company doesfirst quarter 2018, did not expect the adoption of this update to result in a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations or the requirement for retrospective reporting.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”), which will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases that are not short-term in nature. For a lessor, the accounting applied is also largely unchanged from previous guidance. The new rules will be effective for the Company inDuring the first quarter of 2019.2018 the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”) which was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in May 2014.  The Company does not anticipate early adoption.also adopted ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income (Subtopic 310-20)” (“ASU 2017-05”), which was issued by the FASB in February 2017 clarifying the scope of Subtopic 610-20, which was originally issued as part of ASU 2014-09.  ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In addition, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized and the related cash flows.  The Company does not expecthas elected the adoptionmodified retrospective method of adopting ASU 2016-02 to materially change its current accounting methods and therefore the Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.2014 (see Note 4).

 

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)  issued ASU 2017-11,  “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral

F-14


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Recognitionfor Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2016-01”2017-11”) which amended its standards related.  Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting.  Down round features are features of certain financial instruments. This amendment addresses certain aspectsequity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. The new rules will becomefuture equity offerings. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified as equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. ASU 2017-11 is effective for annual and interimreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-11 during the interim period ended September 30, 2017 (see Note 4).

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including accounting for income taxes and classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.  For the Company, ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2017 did not permitted. We are inmaterially change the process of evaluatingCompany’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the impact the amendment will have on ourCompany’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.operation.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company does not plan early adoption of this update and doesASU 2015-17 in 2017 did not expect the adoption of the update to materially change its currentthe Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore the Company doesdid not expect the adoption to have a material impact on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.operation.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015‑11”). ASU 2015-11 affects reporting entities that measure inventory using first-in, first-out or average cost. ASU 2015‑11 requires that inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.2016.  The Company does not plan early adoption of ASU 2015-11 in 2017 did not materially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and doestherefore did not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operationsoperation.

n.Recently Issued Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”).  ASU 2016-13 modifies the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. ASU 2016-13 will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2020. As the Company’s principle credit risk is related to its Lease Receivables the Company does not expect the adoption will not materially changeof this update to result in a material impact on its current accounting methods.consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

In MayFebruary 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”), which will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income

F-15


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

statement. For a lessor, the accounting applied is largely unchanged from previous guidance. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not anticipate early adoption. The Company currently leases administrative offices in the U.S. and in several foreign locations under lease agreements that typically exceed one year.  Depending on the number of years remaining under such lease agreements the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that the Company would record under ASU 2016-2 could be material.  In January 2019, the Company extended the office lease at its corporate headquarters in the U.S.  Lease payments for base rent and common area maintenance are estimated to be approximately $0.9M from January 2019 through December 2024.

4. Change in Accounting Principle

Warrant Liability

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11,  “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”).  Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting.  Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings.  An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities.  In the case where the exception from derivative accounting does not apply, warrants must be accounted for as a liability and recorded at fair value at the date of grant and re-valued at the end of each reporting period.

The September 2012 and 2014 FASBwarrants (see Note 15) include anti-dilution provisions characterized as down round features and were previously accounted for as liabilities, with the fair value of the warrant liabilities remeasured at each reporting date and the International Accounting Standards Board issuedchange in liabilities recorded as other non-operating income or loss.  The Company had recorded a warrant liability of $1.5 million as of September 30, 2017 and reported a warrant derivative loss of $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 relating to the September 2012 and 2014 warrants prior to the change in accounting principle.

In addition, for freestanding equity-classified financial instruments, ASU 2017-11 also requires entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered.  That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS.  Certain equity transactions following the issuance of the September 2012 and 2014 warrants have triggered anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements resulting in additional warrant shares and a reduction to the original strike price of the warrants.  ASU 2017-11 prescribes a method to measure the value of a deemed dividend related to a triggering event by computing the difference in fair value between two instruments that have terms consistent with the actual instrument but that do not have a down round feature, where the number of warrant shares and strike price of one instrument corresponds to the actual instrument before the triggering event and the number of warrant shares and strike price of the other instrument corresponds to the actual instrument immediately after the triggering event.  Following ASU 2017-11, for periods ending on or prior to December 31, 2016 the Company would have reduced its “Accumulated deficit” as reported on its Consolidated Balance Sheets by approximately $0.3 million related to prior triggering events.  During the nine-month period ending September 30, 2017 the Company would have reduced its accumulated deficit by approximately $3,000 related to triggering events. During the year ending December 31, 2018 the Company reduced its accumulated deficit by approximately $8,000 related to triggering events.

F-16


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Except for the down round features in the September 2012 and 2014 warrants, the warrants would have been classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 and therefore qualify for the scope exception in ASU 2017-11As permitted, the Company elected to adopt the accounting principles prescribed by ASU 2017-11 during the interim period ended September 30, 2017 and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment stemming from a change in accounting principle in its financial statements measured retrospectively to the beginning of 2017.  The cumulative effect adjustment appears at the beginning of 2017 in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity.  The results of operations for the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2017 reflect application of the change in accounting principle from the beginning of 2017.  As noted above, the Company had previously reported a warrant derivative gain of $0.4 million during the nine-month period ending September 30, 2017.  Because the Company has retroactively applied the change in accounting principle discussed above to the beginning of 2017, the Company is no longer reporting warrant derivative gains or losses for the September 2012 and 2014 warrants beginning in 2017.

Other Income Related to the Sale of Exploration Properties

During the first quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). which was issued by the FASB” in May 2014. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In addition, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized and the related cash flows.  The Company has elected the modified retrospective method of initially adopting ASU 2014-09. 

ASU 2014-09 is effective for interimrequires, in certain instances, that transactions covered by ASC Topic 610, “Other Income” (“Topic 610”) follow the recognition, measurement and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is not permitted.disclosure guidelines established by ASU 2014-09 was originally effective December 15, 2016 but ASU 2015-14 deferred the effective date by one year.2014-09.  The Company is evaluatinggenerally follows the financial statement implicationsguidance of adopting ASU 2014-09 but does not believeTopic 610 with respect to the recognition of income from the farm-out or sale of exploration properties.  As of the beginning of 2018, the Company had one open contract impacted by the adoption of ASU 2014-09, involving an option agreement under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) may acquire the Company’s interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims located in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Zacatecas Properties”) for a series of payments totaling $1.5 million (Note 9). In applying ASU 2014-09, approximately $49,000 of the income recognized from the Santacruz transaction in the fourth quarter of 2017 would have been recognized in the first quarter of 2018.  Accordingly, the Company has recognized retrospectively the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 by recording a negative adjustment to retained earnings of $49,000 at the beginning of 2018, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, and recording $49,000 in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the period ended December 31, 2018.  See Note 9 for a further description of the contract with Santacruz and the identification of performance obligations and other significant judgments used in applying the guidance of Topic 606 to the contract.

Available for Sale Securities

During the first quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-01, which amended its accounting treatment for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of certain financial assets. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments that have readily determinable fair values to be measured at fair value through net income. Previously, entities would recognize changes in fair value of available-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income and would recognize in net income impairment losses that were other-than-temporary.  There will have a material impactno longer be an available-for-sale classification (with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income) for equity securities with readily determinable fair values.  At December 31, 2017, the Company had equity securities classified as available-for-sale and

F-17


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

reported at fair value of $238,000, with cumulative unrealized losses of $40,000 recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on its consolidated financial position or resultsConsolidated Balance Sheets.  The Company has recognized the cumulative effect of operations.initially adopting ASU 2016-01 by recording a negative adjustment to retained earnings and other comprehensive income of $40,000 at the beginning of 2018, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, and has recorded a gain of approximately $51,000 in “Interest and other income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the period ended December 31, 2018.

 

4.Cash5.Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments include investments with maturities greater than three months, but not exceeding 12 months, or highly liquid investments with maturities greater than 12 months that the Company intends to liquidate during the next 12 months for working capital needs.

 

F-15


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The following tables summarize the Company's short-term investments at December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Estimated

    

Carrying

 

    

 

 

    

Estimated

    

Carrying

 

December 31, 2016

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Value

 

December 31, 2018

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale common stock

 

$

275

 

$

334

 

$

334

 

Total available for sale

 

 

275

 

 

334

 

 

334

 

Trading securities

 

$

275

 

$

330

 

$

330

 

Total trading securities

 

 

275

 

 

330

 

 

330

 

Total short term

 

$

275

 

$

334

 

$

334

 

 

$

275

 

$

330

 

$

330

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale common stock

 

$

199

 

$

72

 

$

72

 

 

$

275

 

$

238

 

$

238

 

Total available for sale

 

 

199

 

 

72

 

 

72

 

Total available for sale common stock

 

 

275

 

 

238

 

 

238

 

Total short term

 

$

199

 

$

72

 

$

72

 

 

$

275

 

$

238

 

$

238

 

 

Credit Risk

 

The Company invests substantially all of its excess cash with high credit-quality financial institutions or in U.S. government or debt securities.  Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a financial instrument. For cash and equivalents and investments, credit risk represents the carrying amount on the balance sheet. The Company mitigates credit risk for cash and equivalents and investments by placing its funds and investments with high credit-quality financial institutions, limiting the amount of exposure to each of the financial institutions, monitoring the financial condition of the financial institutions and investing only in government and corporate securities rated “investment grade” or better.  The Company invests with financial institutions that maintain a net worth of not less than $1 billion and are members in good standing of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.

 

5.Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Prepaid insurance

 

$

296

 

$

302

 

Prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances

 

 

 —

 

 

12

 

Deferred offering costs

 

 

153

 

 

 —

 

Recoupable deposits and other

 

 

129

 

 

137

 

 

 

$

578

 

$

451

 

The deferred offering costs are related to the ATM Program discussed in detail in Note 15.

F-16


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

6.Inventories

Inventories at the Velardeña Properties were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Material and supplies

 

$

245

 

$

330

 

 

 

$

245

 

$

330

 

The Company had no metals or in process inventories at December 31, 2016 and 2015 as the result of the suspension of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties (see Note 1). The material and supplies inventory at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is reduced by a $0.3 million obsolescence charge reflected in shutdown costs.

7.Value added tax receivable

The Company has recorded value added tax (“VAT”) paid in Mexico and related to the Velardeña Properties as a recoverable asset. Mexico law allows for certain VAT payments to be recovered through ongoing applications for refunds. At December 31, 2016 the Company had recorded only a nominal VAT receivable which it expects to recover within a one-year period. The VAT receivable at December 31, 2015 was fully recovered during 2016.

The Company has also paid VAT in Mexico as well as other countries, primarily related to exploration projects, which has been charged to expense as incurred because of the uncertainty of recoverability.

8.Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, net

The components of property, plant, and equipment, net were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral properties

 

$

9,352

 

$

9,630

 

Exploration properties

 

 

2,518

 

 

2,518

 

Royalty properties

 

 

200

 

 

200

 

Buildings

 

 

4,386

 

 

4,377

 

Mining equipment and machinery

 

 

16,351

 

 

16,998

 

Other furniture and equipment

 

 

952

 

 

841

 

Asset retirement cost

 

 

992

 

 

1,285

 

 

 

 

34,751

 

 

35,849

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(25,516)

 

 

(24,724)

 

 

 

$

9,235

 

$

11,125

 

On August 8, 2016, the Company sold certain mining equipment consisting of two haul trucks, two scoop trams and a compressor to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient, for $687,000 (see Note 23). The equipment sold was excess equipment held at the Company’s Velardeña Properties that the Company does not expect to use. The equipment

F-17


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

had a net book value of $27,000 resulting in a gain of $660,000. The gain is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company received $69,000 or 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale, with the remaining $618,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10% due in February 2017. At December 31, 2016 the Company had recorded a receivable of $643,000 related to the sale, including accrued interest.  The receivable amount is included in “Related party receivable” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company expects to amend the original equipment sale in February 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000.  Upon execution of the amendment the Company expects to receive an additional payment of $100,000, and the remaining principal and interest balance as of February 2017 of $737,000, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, would be due in August 2017.

On August 2, 2016, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its remaining 50% interest in the San Diego exploration property in Mexico to Golden Tag Resources ltd (“Golden Tag”), the company that held the other 50% interest in the property. As a result of the sale, the Company received approximately $379,000 in cash and 2,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag.  Pursuant to the agreement, Golden Tag will be required to pay the Company a 2.0% net smelter return royalty in respect to the San Diego property. The Company had previously written down the value of the San Diego property to approximately zero and accordingly recognized a gain of approximately $0.5 million on the sale. The gain is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Following this transaction, the Company now holds 7,500,000 common shares representing approximately 10% of the outstanding common shares of Golden Tag (see Note 4).

In the third quarter 2016, the Company, through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Global Holdings, L.P., a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to the Company’s Celaya exploration property in Mexico. The Company received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum has agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million in the first year of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. The Company has previously expensed all of its costs associated with the Celaya property and accordingly recognized a gain of $0.2 million from the farm-out of the property in the third quarter 2016. The gain is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

On April 28, 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement under which Santa Cruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santa Cruz”) may acquire the Company’s interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims located in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Zacatecas Properties”) for a series of payments totaling $1.5 million. Santa Cruz paid the Company $0.2 million on signing the agreement and an additional $0.2 million in October 2016. In order to maintain its option and acquire the Zacatecas Properties, Santa Cruz is required to pay additional amounts of $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million due 12, 18 and 24 months after signing respectively. Santa Cruz has the right to terminate the option agreement at any time, and the agreement will terminate if Santa Cruz fails to make a payment when due. The Company has previously expensed all of its costs associated with the Zacatecas Properties and accordingly recognized a gain of $0.4 million on the first two payments received which is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company received $0.3 million related to an option agreement on its Otuzco property in Peru. In addition, the Company sold certain non-strategic mining concessions and equipment for net proceeds of approximately $0.5 million and recorded a $0.2 million gain on the transactions. The net gains for the above transactions are reflected in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

F-18


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

6.Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31,

    

December 31,

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Prepaid insurance

 

$

358

 

$

362

 

Deferred offering costs

 

 

569

 

 

137

 

Recoupable deposits and other

 

 

261

 

 

246

 

 

 

$

1,188

 

$

745

 

 

The ARC is alldeferred offering costs are related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties. The decreaseATM Program and the LPC Program, discussed in the ARC during the period is related to an adjustment to the ARO (seedetail in Note 11) and to the impairment of the ARC, as discussed below.15.

 

At September 30, 2015

7.Inventories

Inventories at the Company determined that the recoverability of certain mineral propertyVelardeña Properties were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Material and supplies

 

$

229

 

$

242

 

 

 

$

229

 

$

242

 

The material and exploration property costssupplies inventory at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are related to the Velardeña Properties Mineral Properties Asset Group was impaired. and are reduced by a $0.2 million obsolescence reserve.

8.Value added tax receivable

The Company reduced the carryinghas recorded value ofadded tax (“VAT”) paid in Mexico and related to the Velardeña Properties mineralas a recoverable asset. Mexico law allows for VAT payments to be recovered from VAT collected from the sale of products or rendering of services. At December 31, 2018, the Company has also recorded approximately $30,000 of VAT receivable as a reduction to VAT payable in Mexico, which appears in “Accounts payable and exploration properties by $12.8other accrued liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During 2017 the Company received refunds of approximately $1.1 million from the government of Argentina for VAT payments made in that country during 2012 and 2013. Because of uncertainties relating to collectability of the ARC by $0.4 million andtaxes the Company had recorded a $13.2full valuation allowance against the VAT receivable at the time the taxes were paid. The Company reported the $1.1 million impairment chargeof VAT refunds received during the year ended December 31, 2017 in “Other operating income” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (see Note 2). The table below sets forthLoss. In February 2018, the detailCompany received an additional approximately $138,000 of VAT refunds. At December 31, 2017, the Company reversed $138,000 of the impairment chargesvaluation allowance and recorded toa VAT receivable of $138,000 with a corresponding gain in “Other operating income” on the VelardeñConsolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company has remaining Argentina VAT refund claims totaling approximately $0.1 million.  The Company cannot predict if or when it will receive these additional VAT refunds and accordingly has recorded a Properties property, plant and equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Value

 

Charge

 

Gross Value

 

 

    

Prior to

    

Minerals

    

After

 

 

 

Impairment at

 

Properties

 

Impairment at

 

 

 

Sept. 30, 2015

 

Asset Group

 

Sept. 30, 2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral properties

 

$

21,936

 

$

12,306

 

$

9,630

 

Exploration properties

 

 

3,001

 

 

458

 

 

2,543

 

Royalty properties

 

 

200

 

 

 —

 

 

200

 

Buildings

 

 

4,377

 

 

 —

 

 

4,377

 

Mining equipment and machinery

 

 

17,181

 

 

 —

 

 

17,181

 

Other furniture and equipment

 

 

841

 

 

 —

 

 

841

 

Asset retirement cost

 

 

1,702

 

 

417

 

 

1,285

 

 

 

$

49,238

 

$

13,181

 

$

36,057

 

The carrying value afterfull valuation allowance against the impairment at September 30, 2015 represents the fair value of the assets as discussed in Note 3.

9.Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities

The Company’s accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Accounts payable and accruals

 

$

344

 

$

599

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

 

 

880

 

 

545

 

 

 

$

1,224

 

$

1,144

 

December 31, 2016

Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2016 consist primarily of $0.1 million and $0.2 million due to contractors and suppliers related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and corporate administrative activities, respectively.  In the case of the Velardeña Properties, amounts due also includeremaining VAT payable that partially offset by a small VAT receivable.refund claims.  

 

F-19


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 2016 consist of $0.2 million of accrued vacation payable, $0.4 millionThe Company has also paid VAT in Mexico as well as other countries, primarily related to withholding taxesexploration projects, which has been charged to expense as incurred because of the uncertainty of recoverability.

9.Property, Plant and benefits payable,Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, net

The components of which $0.2 million is relatedproperty, plant, and equipment, net were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral properties

 

$

9,353

 

$

9,352

 

Exploration properties

 

 

2,518

 

 

2,518

 

Royalty properties

 

 

200

 

 

200

 

Buildings

 

 

4,278

 

 

4,246

 

Mining equipment and machinery

 

 

16,024

 

 

15,989

 

Other furniture and equipment

 

 

888

 

 

958

 

Asset retirement cost

 

 

866

 

 

865

 

 

 

 

34,127

 

 

34,128

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(27,018)

 

 

(25,988)

 

 

 

$

7,109

 

$

8,140

 

Equipment Related to activities at the Velardeña Properties, and $0.3 millionOxide Plant Lease

Certain assets of the Company are related to the Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan ("KELTIP")lease of the Velardeña oxide plant to Hecla (see Note 15)1).  The net book value of the equipment involved in the lease was $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

 

December 31, 2015Minera Indé Equipment Sale

 

Accounts payableIn August 2016, the Company sold certain mining equipment consisting of two haul trucks, two scoop trams and accrualsa compressor to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of The Sentient Group (“Sentient”), for $687,000 (see Note 22). The equipment sold was excess equipment held at December 31, 2015 consist primarily of $0.3 million and $0.3 million due to contractors and suppliers related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and corporate administrative activities, respectively.  Inthat the caseCompany did not expect to use.  The Company received $69,000 or 10% of the Velardeñsales price at the closing of the sale, with the remaining $618,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10% due in February 2017.  With the approval of a Properties, amounts due alsoSpecial Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company and Minera Indé amended the original equipment sale on March 31, 2017 to include VAT payable that is notthe sale of an offsetadditional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the VAT receivable.

Accrued employee compensationoriginal equipment sale.  Upon execution of the amendment the Company received an additional payment of $100,000. The remaining principal and benefitsinterest balance, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at December 31, 2015 consistan annual rate of $0.1 million10%, was amended to be due in August 2017.  The Company recorded a gain of accrued vacation payable, $0.4 million related$105,000 on the sale of the additional equipment, included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, equal to withholding taxes and benefits payable, of which $0.2 million is related to activities at the Velardeña Properties, and $0.1 milliongross proceeds less the remaining basis in the equipment.  On May 2, 2017, the Company received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the KELTIP) (see Note 15).

10.Convertible Note Payable – Related Party, Net

On October 27, 2015, the Company closed and borrowed the entire amount available under a $5.0 million secured convertible loan (the “Sentient Loan”) from The Sentient Group (“Sentient”) with principal and accruedequipment sale, including interest due on October 27, 2016. To comply with security regulations and stock exchange rules in the United States and Canada, the Company received stockholder approval on January 19, 2016 to allow principal and accrued interest under the Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Sentient Note”)  to be converted, solely at Sentient's option, into shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to the lowest of: 1) $0.29 , 90 percent of the 15-day volume weighted average price ("VWAP") for the period immediately preceding the loan closing date, 2) 90 percent of the 15-day VWAP for the period immediately preceding the Loan conversion date, or 3) an anti-dilution adjusted price based on the lowest price for which the Company has sold its stock following the Loan closing date. The Loan bore interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum, compounded monthly.

On February 11, 2016, Sentient converted approximately $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest under the Sentient Note (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) into 23,355,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.172 per share, equal to 90% of the 15-day VWAP immediately preceding the conversion date.  On June 10, 2016, Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1 million of principal and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) into 4,011,740 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.289 per share, equal to 90% of the 15day VWAP immediately preceding the loan’s original issuethrough that date.

 

The beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note represented an embedded derivative as defined by ASC 815 "Derivatives and Hedging" ("ASC 815"). ASC 815 provides that a derivative instrument's fair value must be bifurcated from the note and separately recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company used a third party consultant to value the embedded derivative in the Sentient Note employing a Monte Carlo type probability analysis, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 13). For purposes of valuing the embedded derivative as of the Sentient Loan closing date, at December 31, 2015, at February 11, 2016 (first partial conversion date), and at June 10, 2016 (the remaining conversion date), the valuation model took into account, among other items: 1) the probability of successfully achieving stockholder approval of the Sentient Note’s conversion feature, 2) future variations in the Company’s stock price, and 3) the probability of entering into an equity transaction prior to the Sentient loan maturity date that would lower the conversion price. It was determined that the embedded derivative had a fair value of approximately $1.1 million at October 27, 2015, the date the Company entered into the Sentient Loan.  Subsequent mark-to-market

F-20


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

changes

Celaya Farm-out

In August 2016, the Company, through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Group, LLC, a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to the Company’s Celaya exploration property in Mexico. The Company received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million in the valuefirst year of the derivative were recordedagreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program.  Electrum initially earned the right to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project by incurring exploration expenditures totaling at least $2.5 million during the initial first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as income or lossmanager of the joint venture. Prior to subsequent amendments to the agreement, the Company would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest in the Consolidated StatementsCelaya project, following the initial earn-in period, by contributing its pro-rata share of Operationsan additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period. 

In February 2018, the Company and Comprehensive Loss.  The Sentient Note was recorded netElectrum amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an incremental 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $1.0 million.  Following the amendment, Electrum could have increased its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the bifurcated embedded derivative at October 27, 2015 with$2.5 million of additional expenditures required in the $1.1 million difference betweensecond three-year earn-in period.  Following the face valuesecond earn-in period, and prior to the recorded valueCompany entering into a second and final amendment of the Note representingagreement, the Company could have maintained its 20% participating interest, or its interest could ultimately have been converted into a loan discount that was amortizedcarried 10% net profits interest if the Company elected not to interest expense overparticipate as a joint venture owner. 

In September 2018, the lifeCompany and Electrum entered into a second and final amendment of the loan using the interest rate method.

The Company incurred approximately $0.3 million in legal and other costs associated with the Sentient Loan. Per the guidance of ASU 2015-03 the loan costs were presented as a reductionCelaya earn-in agreement pursuant to the note payable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and were amortized to interest expense over the lifewhich Electrum acquired 100% of the Sentient note using theCompany’s remaining interest rate method (see Note 3).

The derivative was recorded at fair value with subsequent mark-to-market changes in the valueCelaya project in exchange for a payment of the derivative recorded as income or loss$3.0 million.  The transaction was set out in the Consolidated Statementsa definitive Assignment of OperationsRights Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) containing customary terms and Comprehensive Loss.  Itconditions. The earn-in agreement was determined that the embedded derivative had a fair value of approximately $1.1 million at October 27, 2015, the date the Company enteredterminated upon entry into the Sentient Loan.  At December 31, 2015 the embedded derivative had a fair value of approximately $0.5 million and the Company recorded a gain of approximately $0.6 million.

Because the Sentient Loan was recorded net of the bifurcated embedded derivative and loan costs, both of which were amortized to interest expense over the life of the loan, the effective rate of interest on the recorded loan obligation was higher than the stated nominal rate of interest. The effective interest rate on the Sentient Note was approximately 36%, compounded monthly, compared to the stated nominal rate of 9.0% per annum, compounded monthly.Assignment Agreement.

 

The Company adjustedhas previously expensed all its costs associated with the recorded valueCelaya property and accordingly recognized gains of $1.0 million from the execution of the Sentient Loan asfirst amendment to the agreement and $3.0 million upon execution of the conversion dates to reflect the amortization of the loan discount and loan costs, shown as “Interest expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a total noncash loss on debt extinguishment of $1.7 million reflecting the difference between the value of the shares issued to Sentient as a result of the two separate conversions and the recorded value of the Sentient Loan, including related loan costs, loan discount and embedded derivative eliminated at the conversion dates. The Company marked-to-market the embedded derivative at each of the conversion dates and recorded a total derivative loss of $0.8 millionAssignment Agreement, during the year ended December 31, 20162018, with the amounts included in “Other operating income, net in the Condensedaccompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

Zacatecas Farm-out

In April 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement, which was later amended in February 2018, under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) has acquired the Company’s interest in the Zacatecas Properties for a series of payments totaling approximately $1.5 million through October 2018, including $249,000, $225,000 and $212,000 paid to the Company during the first, second and third quarters of 2018, respectively.  The final payment due the Company of $13,000 was received in October 2018.   Upon receipt of each cash payment, the agreement imposed a performance obligation on the Company to provide Santacruz an exclusive right to the Zacatecas Properties to conduct exploration activities during the period from receipt of the payment until the next payment due date, with a final obligation, following receipt of the final payment, to formally acknowledge completion of the sale enabling Santacruz to register the title to the properties in their name  At December 31, 2016 the Sentient Note had been fully converted2018, there were no further performance obligations and the Company had no outstanding debt.taken all steps necessary for Santacruz to take title to the properties.

F-21


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The Company has previously expensed all its costs associated with the Zacatecas Properties.  The Company recognized income, equal to the cash payments made, evenly over the period covered by each payment.  The Company recognized approximately $748,000 of income under the agreement during the year ended December 31, 2018, which is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  

.

 

 

10.Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities

The Company’s accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Accounts payable and accruals

 

$

358

 

$

310

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1,344

 

 

1,246

 

 

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,556

 

December 31, 2018

Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2018 are primarily related to amounts due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.2 million related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and $0.2 million related to exploration and corporate administrative activities.  In the case of the Velardeña Properties, approximately $0.1 million is related to a net VAT payable.

Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 2018 consist of $0.2 million of accrued vacation payable and $0.4 million related to withholding taxes and benefits payable. Included in the $1.3 million of accrued employee compensation and benefits is $0.6 million related to activities at the Velardeña Properties and $0.4 million related to the Company’s 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “KELTIP”) (see Note 15).

December 31, 2017

Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2017 are primarily related to amounts due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.1 million related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and $0.2 million related to corporate adminis trative and exploration activities.  In the case of the Velardeña Properties, approximately $0.1 million is related to a net VAT payable.

Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 2017 consist of $0.2 million of accrued vacation payable and $0.6 million related to withholding taxes and benefits payable. Included in the $1.2 million of accrued employee compensation and benefits is $0.3 million related to activities at the Velardeña Properties and $0.4 million related to the KELTIP (see Note 15).

F-22


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

11.Asset Retirement and Reclamation Liabilities

 

The Company retained the services of a mining engineering firm to prepare a detailed closure plan for the Velardeña Properties. The plan was completed during the second quarter 2012 and indicated that the Company had an ARO and offsetting ARC of approximately $1.9 million.  The estimated $3.5 million ARO and ARC that was recorded at the time of the acquisition of the Velardeña Properties was adjusted accordingly.

 

The Company will continue to accrue additional estimated ARO amounts based on an asset retirement plan as activities requiring future reclamation and remediation occur.  During the year ended December 31, 20162018 the Company recognized approximately $0.2 million of accretion expense and approximately $33,000$2,000 of amortization expense related to the ARC.

 

F-21


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The following table summarizes activity in the Velardeña Properties ARO:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

2,480

 

$

2,582

 

 

$

2,448

 

$

2,380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in estimates, and other

 

 

(293)

 

 

(300)

 

 

 

 2

 

 

(128)

 

Accretion expense

 

 

193

 

 

198

 

 

 

210

 

 

196

 

Ending balance

 

$

2,380

 

$

2,480

 

 

$

2,660

 

$

2,448

 

 

The decrease in the ARO recorded during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 20152017 is the result of changes in assumptions related to inflation factors and discount rates used in the determination of future cash flows.

 

The ARO set forth on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 20152017 includes approximately $0.1 milliona nominal amount of reclamation liabilitiesliability related to activities at the El Quevar project in Argentina for each of the periods.Argentina.

 

12.Other Liabilities

 

The Company recorded nominal amounts of other current liabilities of approximately nil and $0.6 million at December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015 respectively.2017. The December 31, 2015 amount includes a net liability of approximately $0.4 millionamounts are primarily related to the Argentina tax on equity due for years 2009 through 2012 stemming from a tax audit of those years, including approximately $0.2 million of estimated interest and penalties.

During the first four months of 2016 the Company paid approximately $0.2 million of Argentine tax on equity leaving approximately $0.2 million of estimated interest and penalties awaiting a final assessment from the tax authorities.  During the third quarter 2016 the Argentine government adopted an amnesty program that the Company effectively used to eliminate the remaining $0.2 million of interest and penalties that had been accrued.  The reversal of the accrual reduced expenses incurred at the El Quevar project during the third quarter 2016.

The December 31, 2015 amount also includes $0.1 million of accrued interest on the Sentient Loan and $0.1 million as a loss contingency on a disputed contract with a third party contractor in Mexico.  The dispute was settled during the first quarter 2016 for the amount previously accrued.Company’s office lease. 

 

13.Fair Value Measurements

 

Financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring (annual) basis under a framework of a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  This hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  Further, financial assets and liabilities should be classified by level in their entirety based upon the lowest level of input that was significant to the fair value measurement.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820 are as follows:

 

Level 1:  Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.

F-22F-23


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

Level 2:  Quoted prices in inactive markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or other observable inputs either directly related to the asset or liability or derived principally from corroborated observable market data.

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs due to the fact that there is little or no market activity. This entails using assumptions in models which estimate what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 

The Company has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed in Notes 2, 10 and 15 in all periods presented.

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at fair value at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 by respective level of the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,588

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2,588

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

 

380

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

380

 

Short-term investments

 

 

334

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

334

 

 

 

$

3,302

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability - related party

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

976

 

$

976

 

Warrant liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

922

 

 

922

 

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1,898

 

$

1,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,077

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,077

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

 

546

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

546

 

Short-term investments

 

 

72

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

72

 

 

 

$

4,695

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,695

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability - related party

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

117

 

$

117

 

Warrant liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

93

 

 

93

 

Derivative liability - related party

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

488

 

 

488

 

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

698

 

$

698

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

At December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

3,293

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,293

 

Lease receivables

 

 

481

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

481

 

Short-term investments

 

 

330

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

330

 

 

 

$

4,104

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

3,250

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,250

 

Lease receivables

 

 

314

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

314

 

Short-term investments

 

 

238

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

238

 

 

 

$

3,802

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,802

 

 

The Company’s cash equivalents, comprised principally of U.S. treasury securities, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

F-23


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The Company’s trade accounts receivable are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and are related to the sale of metals at our Velardeña Properties and the oxide plant lease and are valued at published metals prices per the terms of the refining and smelting agreements and lease rates perestablished in the plant lease agreement.

 

The Company’s short-term investments consist of the common stock in Golden Tag and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 5)

At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017 the Company recorded a liability for warrants to acquire the Company’s stock as a result of anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements that could result in a resetting of the warrant exercise price in the event the Company were to issue additional shares of its common stock in a future transaction at a price lower than the current exercise price of the warrants (see Note 15). The Company assesses the fair value of its warrant liability at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the value recorded as “Warrant derivative (loss) gain” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate. The warrant liability has been recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which fallsdid not have any financial assets or liabilities classified within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise price of the warrants.

 

The beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note represents an embedded derivative as defined by ASC 815 (see Note 10). ASC 815 provides that a derivative instrument’s fair value must be bifurcated from the host contract and separately recorded on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2015 and at each of the conversion dates (see Note 10), the Company had recorded a derivative liability related to the beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note. On June 10, 2016, the remaining Sentient Note and related embedded derivative had been fully retired.  The Company assesses the fair value of the derivative liability at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the value recorded as “Derivative loss” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes inNon-recurring Fair Value Measurements

There were no non-recurring fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate. The derivative liability was recorded at fair value at December 31, 2015 and each of the conversion dates based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The valuation model takes into account, among other items: 1) the probability of successfully achieving stockholder approval of the loan’s conversion feature, 2) future variations in the Company’s stock price, and 3) the probability of entering into an equity transaction prior to the Loan maturity date that would lower the conversion price.2018 or December 31, 2017.

In addition to the warrant exercise prices (see Note 15) and Sentient Note conversion price (see Note 10) other significant inputs to the warrant valuation model and derivative valuation model included the following as applicable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31,

    

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Company's ending stock price

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.20

 

Company's stock volatility

 

 

110%

 

 

85%

 

Applicable risk free interest rate

 

 

1.39%

 

 

1.48%

 

 

F-24


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

An increase or decrease in the Company’s stock price, in isolation, would result in a relatively lower or higher fair value measurement respectively.  A decrease in the probability of the issuance of additional common stock at a lower price than the current warrant exercise price would result in a lower value for the warrants.  The table below highlights the change in fair value of the warrant liability and the derivative liability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

Using Significant Unobservable

 

 

 

Inputs (Level 3)

 

 

 

Warrant Liabilities

    

Derivative Liability

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance at January 1, 2015

 

$

1,554

 

$

 —

 

Sentient Note, October 27, 2015

 

 

 —

 

 

1,040

 

Change in estimated fair value

 

 

(1,344)

 

 

(552)

 

Ending balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

210

 

$

488

 

Conversion of Sentient Loan (see Note 10)

 

 

 —

 

 

(488)

 

Change in estimated fair value

 

 

1,688

 

 

 —

 

Ending balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

1,898

 

$

 —

 

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

There were no non-recurring fair value measurements at December 31, 2016.

The Company did conduct a fair value assessment of its mineral properties related to the Velardeña Properties at September 30, 2015 (see Note 2). The following table summarizes the Company’s non-recurring fair value measurements at September 30, 2015 by respective level of the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

At September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineral properties

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,354

 

$

1,354

 

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1,354

 

$

1,354

 

The Company assesses the fair value of its long lived assets if circumstances indicate a change in the fair value has occurred.  The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate.

 

To determine theNo fair value adjustments to long lived assets were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

14.Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of mineral properties the Company uses a discounted cash flow evaluation approach and reliedASC 740 on a third party mining consultingtax jurisdictional basis.  The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

    

2018

    

2017

CURRENT TAXES:

 

(in thousands)

   United States

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

   Other Countries

 

 

13

 

 

13

 

 

$

13

 

$

13

DEFERRED TAXES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

   United States

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

   Other Countries

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Total income tax provision

 

$

13

 

$

13

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes by country consists of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

United States

 

$

(1,930)

 

$

(7,197)

 

Other Countries

 

 

(2)

 

 

3,318

 

 

 

$

(1,932)

 

$

(3,879)

 

The Company recorded $13,000 and engineering firm to assist with$13,000 of current tax expense for the determinationyears ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, stemming from taxable income of a residual value forsubsidiary in Mexico.  No deferred taxes were recorded in 2018 or 2017, as any such tax expense or benefit incurred during the Velardeñyear has been offset against a mineral properties, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The discounted cash flow valuation approach relies upon assumptions for future metals prices and projected silver and gold grades, recoveries, and mining and processing costs related to the Velardeña Properties. In determining the residual value of the mineral properties the third-party mining consulting and engineering firm reviewed comparable sales of similar propertieschange in the region and considered the locationvaluation allowance of the Company’s properties to other active mining operationsvarious deferred tax assets in close proximity to the Company’s properties.  See Note 2 for further details related to the determination of fair value.each country.

 

F-25


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

14.Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, "Income Taxes" ("ASC 740") on a tax jurisdictional basis. 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes by country consists of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

United States

 

$

(11,732)

 

$

(6,484)

 

Other Countries

 

 

1,073

 

 

(18,899)

 

 

 

$

(10,659)

 

$

(25,383)

 

In 2016 and 2015 the Company recorded no current or deferred tax expense or benefit, as any tax expense or benefit incurred during the year has been offset against a change in the valuation allowance of various deferred tax assets in each country.

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes computed at the statutory rate to the provision for income taxes as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss is summarized below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Year Ended December 31,

 

 

For Year Ended December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Tax expense (benefit) at US rate of 34%

 

$

(3,624)

 

$

(8,630)

 

Tax expense (benefit) at US rate of 21%

 

$

(406)

 

$

(1,319)

 

Other adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rate differential of other jurisdictions

 

 

(98)

 

 

681

 

 

 

67

 

 

(70)

 

Effects of foreign earnings

 

 

(786)

 

 

(1,475)

 

 

 

(455)

 

 

310

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(4,690)

 

 

3,745

 

 

 

(16,142)

 

 

33,975

 

Provision to tax return true-ups

 

 

209

 

 

(10,533)

 

 

 

(2,012)

 

 

(33,720)

 

Exchange rate changes on deferred tax assets

 

 

8,802

 

 

15,772

 

 

 

5,891

 

 

(8,444)

 

Effect of a change in tax rates

 

 

(1,177)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 

11,516

 

Debt extinguishment loss

 

 

550

 

 

 —

 

Warrant liability loss

 

 

838

 

 

 —

 

Tax loss on sale of subsidiary

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,693)

 

Inflation adjustment on net operating losses

 

 

(550)

 

 

(2,491)

 

Expired net operating losses

 

 

13,669

 

 

1,931

 

Other

 

 

(24)

 

 

440

 

 

 

(49)

 

 

18

 

Income tax provision

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

$

13

 

$

13

 

 

F-26


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The components of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the  year ended

 

 

For the  year ended

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

$

96,038

 

$

98,571

 

 

$

117,665

 

$

131,866

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1,435

 

 

1,325

 

 

 

593

 

 

517

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

7,545

 

 

9,816

 

 

 

3,284

 

 

4,307

 

Other

 

 

1,016

 

 

1,139

 

 

 

2,809

 

 

3,274

 

 

 

106,034

 

 

110,851

 

 

 

124,351

 

 

139,964

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

 

(105,820)

 

 

(110,510)

 

 

 

(123,652)

 

 

(139,795)

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

214

 

 

341

 

 

 

699

 

 

169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

(195)

 

 

(189)

 

 

 

(699)

 

 

(169)

 

Other

 

 

(19)

 

 

(152)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(214)

 

 

(341)

 

 

 

(699)

 

 

(169)

 

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

In accordance with ASC 740, the Company presents deferred tax assets net of its deferred tax liabilities on a tax jurisdictional basis on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The net deferred tax liability as of December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 20152017 was zero. 

 

At the end of 2017 a new U.S. tax law was enacted, lowering the U.S. corporate tax rate beginning in 2018 to 21% from the top rate of 35%.  The tax rate change resulted in a reduction of the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets by $10.2 million.  The Company’s deferred tax assets are currently completely offset by a valuation allowance so the reduction

F-26


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

in U.S. deferred tax assets had no impact on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20162017.  In addition, the new tax law imposed a transition tax on the accumulated earnings and profits of controlled foreign corporations (“CFC’s).  None of the Company’s CFCs currently have accumulated earnings and profits and therefore the Company had no transition tax liability.  No other provisions of the new tax law had a material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2017. 

At December 31, 2018 the Company had net operating loss carryforwards in the U.S. and in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions totaling $315.5$434.9 million.  Of these, $77.8$79.8 million is related to the Velardeña Properties in Mexico and expires in future years through 2026. $21.02028, $12.5 million is related to other Mexico exploration activities and also expiresexpiring in future years through 2026. $132.42028, $89.6 million net operating losses existexists in Luxembourg and Spain and havehas no expiration date, while $18.2and $179.7 million existexists in other non-U.S. countries, which will expire in future years through 2026.2035.  In the U.S. there are $66.1$73.3 million of net operating loss carryforwards which will expire in future years through 2036.have no expiration.

 

The valuation allowance offsetting the net deferred tax assets of the Company of $105.8$123.7 million and $110.5$139.8 million at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, relates primarily to the uncertain utilization of certain deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards, in various tax jurisdictions.  The Company continually assesses both positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets can be realized prior to their expiration.

 

The Company, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries file tax returns in the United States and in various foreign jurisdictions.  The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation.  The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved.  In accordance with ASC 740, the Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is less than a more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld upon review by the relevant taxing authority.  Such positions are deemed to be “unrecognized tax benefits” which require additional disclosure and recognition of a liability within the financial statements.  If recognized, none of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.

F-27


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes any estimated penalties and interest on all identified unrecognized tax benefits.  The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 are completely offset by net deferred tax benefits and therefore do not appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period

 

$

937

 

$

1,163

 

 

$

586

 

$

740

 

Increases for tax positions taken during prior years

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

(197)

 

 

(226)

 

 

 

(213)

 

 

(154)

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of period

 

$

740

 

$

937

 

 

$

373

 

$

586

 

 

Tax years as early as 20112012 remain open and are subject to examination in the Company’s principal tax jurisdictions.  The Company does not expect a significant change to its net unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months.  No interest and penalties were recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 20162018 or 2015,2017, and there were no interest and penalties recognized in the statement of

F-27


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

financial position as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017.  The Company classifies income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense.

 

15.Equity

 

Registered direct purchase agreement and commitment purchase agreement and registration rights agreement

On May 9, 2018 the Company entered into a registered direct purchase agreement (the “Registered Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“LPC”) pursuant to which LPC purchased 3,153,808 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.4122 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American on May 8, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.3 million.

On May 9, 2018, the Company also entered into a commitment purchase agreement (the “Commitment Purchase Agreement” and together with the Registered Purchase Agreement, the “LPC Program”) and a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with LPC, pursuant to which the Company, at its sole discretion, has the right to sell  up to an additional $10.0 million of the Company’s common stock to LPC, subject to certain limitations and conditions contained in the Commitment Purchase Agreement.  The Company closed on the Commitment Purchase Agreement in July 2018.

On June 7, 2018, pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreements, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-225483) (the “Registration Statement”) registering the resale up to 15,222,941 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued to LPC pursuant to the terms of the Commitment Purchase Agreement. The Registration Statement was declared effective on June 28, 2018. Proceeds from the LPC Program will be used for general corporate purposes, including advancing the exploration program at the Company’s El Quevar property in Argentina. 

Subject to the terms of the Commitment Purchase Agreement, the Company will control the timing and amount of any future sale of the Company’s common stock to LPC. LPC has no right to require any sales by the Company under the Commitment Purchase Agreement but is obligated to make purchases at the Company’s sole direction, as governed by such agreement. There are no upper limits to the price LPC may be obligated to pay to purchase common stock from the Company and the purchase price of the shares will be based on the prevailing market prices of the Company’s shares at the time of each sale to LPC. LPC has agreed not to cause or engage in any manner whatsoever, any direct or indirect short selling or hedging of the Company’s shares of common stock. The Company has the right to terminate the Commitment Purchase Agreement at any time, at its discretion, without any cost or penalty.

In consideration for LPC’s commitment to purchase shares pursuant to the Commitment Purchase Agreement, the Company paid LPC a commitment fee of $300,000 and incurred an additional approximate $190,000 in stock exchange fees, legal and other associated costs in connection with the LPC Program.  The total costs for the LPC Program will be recorded as a reduction to equity as common stock is sold to LPC. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $58,000 of LPC Program costs had been amortized against $1.3 million in proceeds received, resulting in $432,000 of deferred LPC Program costs, recorded in “Prepaid expenses and other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of December 31, 2018, no additional common stock had been sold to LPC under the LPC Program following the initial sale of common stock pursuant to the Registered Purchase Agreement.  Subsequent to December 31, 2018 the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 745,000 common shares under the Commitment Purchase Agreement at an average price of $0.31 per common share for total proceeds of approximately $230,000 during the year to date period ended February 27, 2019.  

F-28


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Cancellation of Treasury Shares

Pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the Company and ECU, relating to the merger of the two companies on September 2, 2011, ECU shareholders had the right to receive 0.05 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of ECU common stock held. On the sixth anniversary following the merger any unconverted shares expired per the terms of the agreement. Accordingly, during December 2017, ECU shares being held for conversion, representing 125,739 shares of the Company, were returned to treasury and canceled. 

Consideration Shares

On August 2, 2017, the Company granted Hecla an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years (see Note 16).  As partial consideration for the option Hecla purchased $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of the Company’s common stock (the “Consideration Shares”), issued at a price of $0.55 per share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price. The Consideration Shares were offered and sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder.  Under the terms of the Option Agreement (defined in Note 16), the Company agreed to register with the SEC the resale of the Consideration Shares.  A resale registration statement with the SEC became effective in September 2017.  The $1.0 million received for the Consideration Shares, net of $71,000 in legal and stock exchange issuance fees, has been recorded as equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017.

At the Market Offering Agreement

 

OnIn December 20, 2016, the Company entered into an at-the-market offering agreement (the(as amended from time to time, the “ATM Agreement”) with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“WainwrightWainwright”), under which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of the Company’s common stock through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $5.0 million (the “ATM Program”) or a maximum of 10 million shares.  TheOn September 29, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the ATM Agreement will remain in full force and effectwith Wainwright to reflect a new registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-220461) under which shares of the Company’s common stock may be sold under the ATM Program.  On November 23, 2018 the Company entered into a second amendment of the ATM Agreement extending the agreement until the earlier of December 31, 2018,20, 2020, or the date that the ATM Agreement is terminated in accordance with the terms therein. Offers or sales of common shares under the ATM Program will be made only in the United States and no offers or sales of common shares under the ATM Agreement will be made in Canada. The common stock will be distributed at the market prices prevailing at the time of sale. As a result, prices of the common stock sold under the ATM Program may vary as between purchasers and during the period of distribution. The ATM Agreement provides that Wainwright will be entitled to compensation for its services at a commission rate of 2.0% of the gross sales price per share of common stock sold.

The Company reimbursed certain legal expenses of Wainwright totaling $50,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $103,000$109,000 in connection with establishing the ATM Program.  Such costs have been deferred and will be amortized to equity as sales are completed under the ATM Program. At December 31, 2016 the2018 and December 31, 2018, respectively, unamortized costs totaling $136,000 appear on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Prepaid expense and other assets”assets.”.  At December 31, 2016 no offers or sales had been made

The Company did not sell any stock under the ATM Program.

Program during the year ended December 31, 2018.  Subsequent to December 31, 20162018 the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 640,00034,000 common shares under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.74 per common share for gross proceeds of approximately $475,000 during the year to date period ended February 24, 2017. The Company paid a 2% cash commission on the gross proceeds

F-28F-29


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

in the amountCommitment Purchase Agreement at an average price of $0.34 per common share for total proceeds of approximately $10,000 and$11,000 during the year to date period ended February 27, 2019.  During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company incurred approximately $15,000 in additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs associated with the ATM Program that were included in “General and administrative costs” in the Consolidated Statement of approximately $2,000.

.

Sentient Note conversionOperations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

On February 11, 2016, Sentient converted approximately $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest (representingDuring the total amount of accrued interest atyear ended December 31, 2017 the conversion date) into 23,355,000 shares of the Company's common stock atCompany sold an exercise priceaggregate of approximately $0.172 per share, reflecting 90% of the 15-day VWAP immediately preceding the conversion date. On June 10, 2016, Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1 million of principal and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) pursuant to the Sentient Note into 4,011,7401,024,000 common shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.289 per share, equal to 90% of the 15day VWAP immediately preceding the loan’s original issue date (see Note 10).  At September 30, 2016 the Sentient Note had been fully converted and the Company had no further debt outstanding. After conversion, and following the sale of additional shares of the Company’s common stock in 2017 pursuant tounder the ATM Program (discussed above), Sentient holds approximately 46% of the Company’s 89.7 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock.

Offering and Private Placement

On May 6, 2016, the Company issued 8.0 million registered shares of common stock at a purchasean average price of $0.50$0.70 per common share in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) resulting infor gross proceeds of $4.0 million.approximately $720,000. The Company incurredpaid cash commissions and other nominal transaction fees to Wainwright totaling approximately $16,000 or 2.2% of the gross proceeds and amortized approximately $23,000 of deferred accounting, legal and regulatory costs and feesresulting in a net amount of approximately $0.4 million related to the Offering, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $3.6 million.  In connection with the Offering, each investor received in a private placement an unregistered warrant to purchase threequarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The 6.0 million warrants have an exercise price of $0.75 per share and are exercisable beginning six months after the date of issuance and will expire five years from the initial exercise date. 

The net proceeds of the Offering were$682,000 that has been recorded inas equity and appear as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. UsingBalance Sheets.  During the Black Scholes model, the fair value of the warrants issued was $3.6 million, considering the closing stock price on April 29, 2016 (the first business day preceding May 2, 2016, the dateyear ended December 31, 2017 the Company entered into a definitive agreement to issuealso incurred approximately $34,000 in additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs associated with the shares),ATM Program that were included in “General and administrative costs” in the exercise priceConsolidated Statement of Operations and exercise period of the warrants, the Company’s volatility rate of 105%, and the applicable risk free rate of 0.74%.Comprehensive Loss.

 

Equity Incentive Plans

 

In May 2014,Under the Company’s stockholders approved amendments to the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, adopting the Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), pursuant to which awards of the Company’s common stock may be made to officers, directors, employees, consultants and agents of the Company and its subsidiaries.  The Company recognizes stock-based compensation costs using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.

 

F-29


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s restricted stock grants issued under the Equity Plan at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 and changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

    

 

    

Weighted 

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

    

 

    

Weighted 

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant 

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant 

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

 Date Fair 

 

 

 

Grant Date 

 

 

 

 

 Date Fair 

 

 

 

Grant Date 

 

 

Number of 

 

 Value Per 

 

Number of 

 

Fair Value 

 

 

Number of 

 

 Value Per 

 

Number of 

 

Fair Value 

 

Restricted Stock Grants

 

Shares

 

 Share

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 Share

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

84,170

 

$

0.46

 

600,838

 

$

1.48

 

 

203,334

 

$

0.55

 

100,000

 

$

0.63

 

Granted during the period

 

100,000

 

 

0.63

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

280,000

 

 

0.37

 

200,000

 

 

0.53

 

Restrictions lifted during the period

 

(84,170)

 

 

0.46

 

(516,668)

 

 

1.64

 

 

(143,333)

 

 

0.44

 

(96,666)

 

 

0.60

 

Forfeited during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

100,000

 

$

0.63

 

84,170

 

$

0.46

 

 

340,001

 

$

0.45

 

203,334

 

$

0.55

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016 restricted stock grants were made to three employees. No restricted stock grants were made during the year ended December 31, 2015

Restrictions were lifted on 84,170 shares during the year ended December 31, 2016 on the anniversaries of grants made to two officers in prior years. Restrictions were lifted on 336,334 shares during the year ended December 31, 2015 on the anniversaries of grants made to officers and employees in prior years.  In addition, during 2015 restrictions were lifted on 163,334 shares related to the retirement of two officers during the year and restrictions were lifted on 12,000 shares during 2015 in connection with the termination of employment of two employees.  

For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recognized a nominal amount of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants. For the year ended December 31, 20152018 the Company recognized approximately $0.2$0.1 million of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants.  The Company expects to recognize additional compensation expense related to these awards of approximately $62,000$0.1 million over the next 24 months. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 280,000 shares were granted to six employees, with one third of the grants vesting on the grant date and the remaining shares vesting equally on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date.  In addition to the vesting of one third of the shares granted in 2018, restrictions were lifted on 50,000 shares granted to an employee in a prior year.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of compensation expense related to these grants over the next 36 months.

The following table summarizesrestricted stock grants.  During the status of the Company’s stock option grants issued under the Equity Plan atyear ended December 31, 20162017, 200,000 shares were granted to two employees, with 50,000 shares of one grant vesting on the grant date and 2015 and changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Number of 

 

Price Per 

 

Number of 

 

Price Per 

 

Equity Plan Options

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

245,810

 

$

3.47

 

245,810

 

$

3.47

 

Granted during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Restrictions lifted during period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired during period

 

(150,000)

 

 

0.56

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Exercised during period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

245,810

 

$

3.47

 

Exercisable at end of period

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

245,810

 

$

3.47

 

Granted and vested

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

245,810

 

$

3.47

 

remaining shares vesting equally on the

F-30


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

first and second anniversaries of the grant date. The remaining grant vests ratably over three years.  In addition, during 2017, restrictions were lifted on 46,666 shares granted to three employees in a prior year.

During

The following table summarizes the year endedstatus of the Company’s stock option grants issued under the Equity Plan at December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017 and changes during the Company recognized expense of less than $0.1 million related to the outstanding options. years then ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

    

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Number of 

 

Price Per 

 

Number of 

 

Price Per 

 

Equity Plan Options

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

 95,810

 

$

8.02

 

Granted during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Forfeited or expired during period

 

(10,000)

 

$

8.00

 

(55,500)

 

 

8.00

 

Exercised during period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

30,310

 

$

8.06

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

Exercisable at end of period

 

30,310

 

$

8.06

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

Granted and vested

 

30,310

 

$

8.06

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

The Company does not expect to record any additional expense related to these options.

 

Also, pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Non-Employee Director’s Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”).  Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan the non-employee directors receive a portion of their compensation in the form of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) issued under the Equity Plan. The RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant and each vested RSU entitles the director to receive one unrestricted share of common stock upon the termination of the director’s board service.

 

The following table summarizes the status of the RSU grants issued under the Deferred Compensation Plan at December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 and changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

    

 

    

Weighted 

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

    

 

    

Weighted 

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant 

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant 

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

 Date Fair 

 

 

 

Grant Date 

 

 

 

 

 Date Fair 

 

 

 

Grant Date 

 

 

Number of 

 

 Value Per 

 

Number of 

 

Fair Value 

 

 

Number of 

 

 Value Per 

 

Number of 

 

Fair Value 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

Shares

 

 Share

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 Share

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

1,245,285

 

$

1.66

 

935,285

 

$

2.97

2.08

 

1,887,317

 

$

1.16

 

1,607,317

 

$

1.28

 

Granted during the period

 

530,000

 

 

0.42

 

310,000

 

 

0.39

 

 

600,000

 

 

0.42

 

280,000

 

 

0.48

 

Restrictions lifted during the period

 

(167,968)

 

 

1.40

 

 

 

 

 

(257,279)

 

 

1.44

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Forfeited during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

1,607,317

 

$

1.28

 

1,245,285

 

$

1.66

 

 

2,230,038

 

$

0.93

 

1,887,317

 

$

1.16

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 the Company recognized approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million of compensation expense, respectively related to the RSU grantsgrants.  During 2018, 100,000 RSUs were granted to each year.  The Company expectsof the six board members.  During 2017, 40,000 RSUs were granted to recognize additional compensation expense related toeach of the seven board members.  Restrictions lifted on 257,279 RSU grants of less than $0.1 million over the next six months.

The restrictions liftedshares during 2016 all2018 relate to the retirement of Michael T. Mason froma member of the Company’s Board of Directors during the year.

Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan

Pursuant to the KELTIP (see Note 9), KELTIP Units may be granted to certain officers and key employees of the Company, which units will, once vested, entitle such officers and employees to receive an amount in cash or in Company common stock measured generally by the price of the Company's common stock on the settlement date. The KELTIP Units are recorded as a liability as discussed in Note 9.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company awarded 585,000 KELTIP Units to two officers of the Company and recorded approximately $0.2 million of compensation expense, included in “Stock based compensation” in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2016 the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of additional compensation expense. At December 31, 2016 585,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.

During 2015, the Company issued 172,500 shares of its common stock under the Equity Plan to settle the outstanding KELTIP Units due to a retiring officer of the Company. At December 31, 2015 there were no KELTIP Units outstanding.

F-31


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

the year. The Company expects to recognize additional compensation expense related to the RSU grants of less than $0.1 million over the next six months.

Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan

The KELTIP provides for the grant of units (“KELTIP Units”) to certain officers and key employees of the Company, which units will, once vested, entitle such officers and employees to receive an amount, in cash or in Company common stock issued pursuant to the Company’s Equity Plan, measured generally by the price of the Company’s common stock on the settlement date. KELTIP Units are not an actual equity interest in the Company and are solely unfunded and unsecured obligations of the Company that are not transferable and do not provide the holder with any stockholder rights. Payment of the settlement amount of vested KELTIP Units is deferred generally until the earlier of a change of control of the Company or the date the grantee ceases to serve as an officer or employee of the Company. The KELTIP Units are recorded as a liability, included in “Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (Note 10).

During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company awarded 600,000 KELTIP Units to two officers of the Company and recorded approximately $0.3 million of compensation expense, included in “Stock based compensation” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2018 the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately a $0.3 million reduction of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018.  At December 31, 2018 1,620,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company awarded 435,000 KELTIP Units to two officers of the Company and recorded approximately $0.2 million of compensation expense, included in “Stock based compensation” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2017, the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately a $0.1 million reduction of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017.  At December 31, 2017 1,020,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.

 

Common stock warrants

 

The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s common stock warrants at December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 20152017, and the changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

 

 

Weighted 

 

 

 

Weighted 

 

 

 

 

Weighted 

 

 

 

Weighted 

 

 

Number of 

 

Average Exercise 

 

Number of 

 

Average Exercise 

 

 

Number of

 

Average Exercise 

 

Number of

 

Average Exercise 

 

 

Underlying 

 

Price Per

 

Underlying 

 

Price Per

 

 

Underlying

 

Price Per

 

Underlying

 

Price Per

 

Common Stock Warrants

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Shares

 

Share

 

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

8,777,409

 

$

3.95

 

8,777,409

 

$

3.96

 

 

11,478,172

 

$

0.81

 

17,578,950

 

$

2.17

 

Granted during period

 

6,000,000

 

 

0.75

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Dilution adjustment

 

2,801,541

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

39,524

 

 

0.87

 

157,302

 

 

 —

 

Expired during period

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(6,258,080)

 

 

4.62

 

Exercised during period

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

17,578,950

 

$

2.17

 

8,777,409

 

$

3.95

 

 

11,517,696

 

$

0.81

 

11,478,172

 

$

0.81

 

 

The warrants relate to prior and current registered offerings and private placements of the Company’s stock.  In September 2012, the Company closed on both a registered public offering and concurrent private placement with Sentient in which it

F-32


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

sold units, consisting of one share of common stock and a five-year warrant to acquire one half of a share of common stock at an exercise price of $8.42 per share. A total of 3,431,649 warrant shares were issued and became exercisable on March 20, 2013 and will expireexpired on September 19, 2017, five years from the date of issuance.

 

In September 2014 the Company closed on both a registered public offering and concurrent private placement with Sentient in which it sold units, consisting of one share of common stock and a five-year warrant to acquire one half of a share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 per share.  A total of 4,746,000 warrant shares were issued that became exercisable on March 11, 2015 and will expire on September 10, 2019, five years from the date of issuance.

 

OnIn May 6, 2016, the Company closed onissued 8.0 million registered shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) resulting in gross proceeds of $4.0 million. In connection with the Offering, (discussed above) under which the investorseach investor received in a separate private placement an unregistered warrant to purchase threequarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The resulting 6,000,000 warrantswarrant shares have an exercise price of $0.75 per share, becomebecame exercisable six months after the date of issuanceon November 7, 2016 and will expire on November 6, 2021, five years from the initial exercise date.

 

The warrants issued in September 2012 and September 2014 are recorded as a liability on the balance sheet as a result ofwarrant agreements contain anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements that could result in a resetting of the warrant exercise price and the number of warrant shares outstanding in the event the Company were to issue additional shares of its common stock in a future transaction at an offering price lower than the current exercise price of the warrants.  The May 2, 2016 warrant agreement has no anti-dilution clause and the warrants are recorded as equity.

Pursuant to the anti-dilution clauses in the September 2012 and 2014 warrant agreements, the exercise price of the warrants has been adjusted downward asAs a result of the subsequent issuance of the Company’s common stock in separate transactions, including the September 2014 registered public offeringconversion of the Senior Secured Convertible Note which the Company entered into in October 2015 to borrow $5.0 million from Sentient, the Company’s largest stockholder, the May 2016 Offering and private placement, the conversionATM Program, the issuance of shares to Hecla in August 2017 and the Registered  Purchase Agreement with LPC (discussed above), the exercise price of the Sentient Note, the recent Offering (discussed above),2012 and the sale of additional shares of our common stock in 2017 pursuant to the ATM Program (discussed above).2014 warrants has been adjusted downward. As a result of these transactions, the number of shares of common stock

F-32


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

issuable upon exercise of the September 2012 Warrants haswarrants, prior to their expiration on September 19, 2017, had increased from the original 3,431,649 shares to 6,150,9636,258,080 shares (2,719,314(2,826,431 share increase) and the exercise price hashad been reduced from the original $8.42 per share to $4.70$4.62 per share. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2014 Warrantswarrants has increased from the original 4,746,000 shares to 5,460,6125,517,696 shares (714,612(771,696 share increase) and the exercise price has been reduced from the original $1.21 per share to $0.87$0.85 per share. Of

The May 2016 warrants are not subject to anti-dilution and the 6,120,573 and 5,458,377 issuable warrants related to theare recorded as equity.  The September 2012 warrants expired during 2017, and because of a change in accounting principle, the September 2014 warrants respectively, 1,217,992 and 2,900,000, respectively were issuable to Sentient.

Atrecorded in equity on the balance sheet at December 31, 2016 the total liability recorded for the September 20122018 and 2014 warrants was $1.9 million, consisting of $0.1 million for the September 2012 warrants and $1.8 million for the September 2014 warrants. The warrant liability has been recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2016 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy2017 (see Note 13)4). Of the $0.1 million and $1.8 million liability related to the September 2014 and September 2012 warrants, respectively, a nil amount and $1.0 million, respectively were related to warrants held by Sentient.  

The warrants issued during the period are related to the Offering and Private Placement of the Company’s securities completed on May 6, 2016 as discussed above.

 

 

16.Revenue, Deferred Revenue and Related Costs

 

Oxide Plant Lease and Oxide Plant Lease Costs

 

For the year ended December 31, 20162018 the Company recorded revenue of approximately $6.4$7.2 million and related costs of approximately $2.0$2.3 million associated with the lease of the Velardeña Properties oxide plant.  The Company recognizes oxide plant fixed and variable lease fees andas well as reimbursements for labor, utility and other costs as "Revenue: Oxide plant lease"lease in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss following the guidance of ASC 605606 regarding “incomethe income statement characterization of reimbursements received for "out-of-pocket"certain expenses incurred”incurred by the Company in performing its obligations under the lease and “reportingreporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent”.agent.  ASC 605606 supports recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses in situations where the recipient is the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense. The actual costs incurred for reimbursed direct labor and utility costs are reported as “Oxide plant lease costs” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company recognizes lease fees during the period the fees are earned per the terms of the lease.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 the company recorded revenue of approximately $0.7 million and related costs of approximately $0.2 million associated with the lease of the oxide plant. In addition, the Company received an advance payment of $0.5 million that was applied to the lease amounts due during the first four months of 2016. At December 31, 2015 the advance payment was recorded as “Deferred revenue” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Sale of Metals and Cost of Metals Sold

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company sold marketable concentrate products from its Velardeña Properties to three customers. Under the terms of the Company’s agreements with customers, title generally passes when a provisional payment is made, which occurs generally after the product is shipped and customary sales documents are completed.  Costs related to the sale of metals products include direct and indirect costs incurred to mine, process and market the products.  The Company had no metals or in-process inventories at December 31, 2015 as a result of the suspension of mining and processing at its Velardeña Properties (see Note 1).

F-33


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company recognizes lease fees during the period the fees are earned per the terms of the lease.  The oxide plant lease revenue includes a minimum fixed fee of $125,000 per month that is not dependent on tonnes processed.  The monthly fixed fee remains payable for as long as the lease is in effect.

On August 2, 2017, the Company granted Hecla an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”) in exchange for a $1.0 million upfront cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of the Company’s common stock, issued at par at a price of $0.55 per share, based on an undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price.  The option and lease extension were memorialized in (i) an Option Agreement dated August 2, 2017 among the Company and Hecla Mining Company (the “Option Agreement”), and (ii) a Second Amendment to Master Agreement and Lease Agreement dated August 2, 2017 among Minera William S.A. de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and Minera Hecla S.A.  de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (the “Second Amendment”). Under the Second Amendment, Hecla had an option to extend the lease to December 31, 2020 by exercising the option no later than October 3, 2018.  On October 1, 2018 Hecla exercised the Second Amendment option and extended the lease to December 31, 2020.  All of the fixed fees and throughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease.  Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility.  Pursuant to the Second Amendment, Hecla has the right to terminate the lease during the Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice.  Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if the Company decides to use the oxide plant for its own purposes before December 31, 2020.

The Company will recognize the $1.0 million of income from granting the option over the expected life of the lease from August 2, 2017 through December 31, 2020 on a straight-line basis, including such income in “Revenue: Oxide plant lease” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  During the year ended December 31, 2018 the company recognized approximately $0.3 million of amortized income related to the upfront cash payment, included in “Revenue: Oxide plant lease” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  As of December 31, 2018, the unamortized portion of the lease option totaled approximately $0.6 million recorded as short and long term “Deferred revenue” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 

For the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recorded revenue of approximately $6.7 million and related costs of approximately $2.2 million associated with the lease of the Velardeña Properties oxide plant.

.

 

17.Interest and Other Income

 

For the year ended December 31, 20162018 the Company reportedrecorded approximately $0.1 million of interest and other income, of $0.4 million, which includes approximately $0.4 millionprimarily related to a refund of previously paid social security taxes in Mexico.mark-to-market gains on short term investments Note 5.

 

For the year ended December 31, 20152017 the Company reportedhad only a nominal amount of interest and other income, of $3.1 million which includes a $2.3 million reduction and elimination of a loss contingency liabilityprimarily related to foreign withholding taxes thatinterest on amounts receivable from the government could have asserted were owed by the Company, actingsale of mining equipment as withholding agent, on certain interest payments made to a third party (seediscussed in Note 12). Also included in interest and other income for 2015 is approximately $0.8 million related to a refund of previously paid social security taxes in Mexico.9.

18.Derivative Income (Loss)

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded approximately $1.7 million of warrant derivative loss related to an increase in the fair value of the liability recorded for warrants to acquire the Company’s common stock (see Note 13).  During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company recorded approximately $1.3 million of derivative income related to a decrease in the fair value of the liability recorded for the warrants. The warrant liability has been recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise price of the warrants.  Significant inputs to the valuation model included prices for the warrants disclosed above, the probability of an additional issuance of the Company’s common stock at a lower price than the current warrant exercise price and the inputs in the table below for the respective periods.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded approximately $0.8 million of derivative loss related to an increase in the fair value of the derivative liability related to the Sentient Loan. During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company recorded approximately $0.6 million of derivative income related to a decrease in the fair value of the derivative liability related to the Sentient Loan (see Note 10).  The derivative liability was recorded at fair value at June 10, 2016, the date of the conversion of the remaining note (see Note 10), and at December 31, 2015 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 13).  Significant inputs to the valuation model included: 1) future variations in the Company’s stock price, and 2) the probability of entering into an equity transaction prior to the loan maturity date that would lower the conversion price.  

Additional inputs used in the valuation of derivatives related to both the warrants and the Sentient loan are summarized in the table below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

The Company's

    

2016

    

2015

 

Closing stock price

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.20

 

Volatility

 

 

110.00%

 

 

85.00%

 

Risk-free rate

 

 

1.39%

 

 

1.48%

 

 

 

F-34


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

19.Cash18.Cash flow information

 

The following table reconciles net income (loss)loss for the period to cash used in operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(10,659)

 

$

(25,383)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization and depreciation

 

 

1,548

 

 

4,480

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

 

193

 

 

198

 

Foreign currency gain on loss contingency

 

 

 —

 

 

(106)

 

Impairment of long lived assets

 

 

 —

 

 

13,181

 

Asset write off

 

 

24

 

 

27

 

Write off of loss contingency, net

 

 

(212)

 

 

(1,969)

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

 

(1,791)

 

 

(719)

 

Amortization of deferred loan costs

 

 

57

 

 

54

 

Warrant liability fair market adjustment

 

 

1,688

 

 

(1,344)

 

Derivative liability fair market adjustment

 

 

778

 

 

(553)

 

Accretion of loan discount

 

 

372

 

 

 —

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,653

 

 

 —

 

Stock compensation

��

 

593

 

 

453

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease (increase) in trade accounts receivable

 

 

166

 

 

(546)

 

(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

(152)

 

 

384

 

Decrease in inventories

 

 

85

 

 

861

 

Decrease in value added tax recoverable, net

 

 

346

 

 

916

 

Increase in accrued interest payable net of amounts capitalized

 

 

85

 

 

81

 

(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue

 

 

(500)

 

 

500

 

Decrease in reclamation liability

 

 

(11)

 

 

(37)

 

Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

(450)

 

 

(402)

 

Decrease in deferred leasehold payments

 

 

(18)

 

 

(11)

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(6,205)

 

$

(9,935)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,945)

 

$

(3,892)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,171

 

 

952

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

 

163

 

 

196

 

Gain on trading securities

 

 

(92)

 

 

 —

 

Asset write off

 

 

13

 

 

 —

 

Gain on reduction of asset retirement obligation

 

 

 —

 

 

(56)

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(5,144)

 

 

(608)

 

Stock compensation

 

 

226

 

 

296

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in lease receivable

 

 

(167)

 

 

683

 

Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

(10)

 

 

(142)

 

Decrease in inventories

 

 

13

 

 

 3

 

Decrease (increase) in value added tax recoverable, net

 

 

127

 

 

(149)

 

(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue

 

 

(292)

 

 

892

 

Increase (decrease) in reclamation liability

 

 

24

 

 

(8)

 

Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

236

 

 

226

 

Decrease in deferred leasehold payments

 

 

(34)

 

 

(23)

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(5,711)

 

$

(1,630)

 

 

The Company did not make any cash payments for interest or income taxes during the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017.

 

19.Commitments and Contingencies

Leases and Purchase Commitments

The Company has non-cancelable operating lease commitments as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

    

2023

    

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

El Quevar mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

60

 

$

60

 

$

60

 

$

60

 

$

60

 

$

 

Velardeña mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

80

 

$

80

 

$

80

 

$

80

 

$

80

 

$

 

Office space

 

$

224

 

$

157

 

$

160

 

$

163

 

$

166

 

$

154

 

The Company is required to make payments to the Argentine government to maintain its rights to the El Quevar mining concessions. The Company has made such payments totaling approximately $57,000 and $111,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

F-35


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

20.Commitments and Contingencies

Leases and Purchase Commitments

The Company has non-cancelable operating lease commitments as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2018

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

El Quevar mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

115

 

$

115

 

$

115

 

$

115

 

$

115

 

$

 

Velardeña mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

75

 

$

75

 

$

75

 

$

75

 

$

75

 

$

 

Office space

 

$

284

 

$

293

 

$

272

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 

The Company is required to make payments to the Argentine government to maintain its rights to the El Quevar mining concessions. The Company has made such payments totaling approximately $112,000 and $40,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

The Company is required to pay concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain its rights to the Velardeña Properties mining concessions. During the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 the Company made such payments totaling approximately $74,000$78,000 and $24,000$69,000 respectively, and annual payments under its surface right agreement with the local ejido of approximately $25,000.$33,000.

 

The Company has office leases for its corporate headquarters in Golden, Colorado, as well as for its Velardeña Properties offices in Mexico, and exploration offices in Mexico and Argentina.  The lease for the corporate headquarters office space was renegotiated and extended during the first quarter 2014.2019. The new lease reflects an approximately 46%45% reduction in space and an approximately 44%45% reduction in cost beginning MarchApril 1, 2014.2019. The new lease expires November 30, 2019.2024. Payments associated with the corporate headquarters lease were recorded to rent expense by the Company in the amounts of $224,000$237,000 and $227,000$226,000 for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

The Company cannot currently estimate the life of the Velardeña Properties or El Quevar project. The table above assumes that no annual maintenance payments will be made more than five years after December 31, 2016.2018. If the Company continues mining and processing or evaluations of restart at the Velardeña Properties beyond five years, the Company expects that it would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $75,000$80,000 per year for the life of the Velardeña mine. If the Company continues to evaluate development opportunities at the El Quevar project, the Company expects that it would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $115,000$60,000 per year for the life of the El Quevar mine.

 

Payments associated with other exploration concessions the Company owns are not included because the Company has not completed exploration work on these concessions. Exploration success is historically low and the Company has the right to terminate the payments and release the concessions at any time.

 

Contingencies

 

The Company has recordedNo loss contingencies of nil and approximately $0.4 millionwere recorded at December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015, respectively as discussed in Note 12.

F-36


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

2017.

 

21.20.Foreign Currency

 

The Company conducts exploration and mining activities primarily in Mexico and Argentina, and gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are related to those activities. The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar but certain transactions are conducted in the local currencies resulting in foreign currency transaction gains or losses.

 

22.Segment21.Segment Information

 

The Company’s sole activity is the mining, construction and exploration of mineral properties containing precious metals.  The Company’s reportable segments are based upon the Company’s revenue producing activities and cash consuming activities. The Company reports two segments, one for its Velardeña Properties in Mexico and the other comprised of non-revenue producing activities including exploration, construction and general and administrative activities.  Intercompany revenue and expense amounts have been eliminated within each segment in order to report on the basis that management uses internally for evaluating segment performance. The financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

Exploration, El

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quevar,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Depreciation,

 

Velardeña and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicable

 

Depletion and

 

Administrative

 

Pre-Tax

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

The Year ended December 31, 2016

 

Revenue

 

to Sales

 

Amortization

 

Expense

 

(Income)/Loss

 

Total Assets

 

Expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

6,400

 

$

2,046

 

$

1,116

 

$

2,507

 

$

(2,167)

 

$

7,821

 

$

35

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

432

 

 

7,598

 

 

12,826

 

 

6,187

 

 

15

 

 

 

$

6,400

 

$

2,046

 

$

1,548

 

$

10,105

 

$

10,659

 

$

14,008

 

$

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

8,071

 

$

10,065

 

$

3,826

 

$

1,347

 

$

17,346

 

$

8,988

 

$

28

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

654

 

 

8,918

 

 

8,037

 

 

8,013

 

 

16

 

 

 

$

8,071

 

$

10,065

 

$

4,480

 

$

10,265

 

$

25,383

 

$

17,001

 

$

44

 

All of the revenue for the two years presented was from the Company's Velardeña Properties in Mexico (see Note 16).  The revenue for 2016 was all attributable to the lease of the oxide plant.  The revenue for 2015 was attributable to both sales of precipitates and concentrates to three customers under varying agreements and the lease of the oxide plant. The Company suspended operations at its Velardeña properties in November, 2015 (see Note 1).

The 2015 Velardeña Properties pre-tax loss includes a $13.2 million impairment charge recorded at September 30, 2015 (see Note 2).  The impairment charge is also reflected in the reduction of the Velardeña Properties total assets for 2015.

23.Related Party Transactions

The following sets forth information regarding transactions between the Company (and its subsidiaries) and its officers, directors and significant stockholders. 

F-37F-36


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

the basis that management uses internally for evaluating segment performance. The financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

Exploration, El

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quevar,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Depreciation,

 

Velardeña and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicable

 

Depletion and

 

Administrative

 

Pre-Tax

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

The Year ended December 31, 2018

 

Revenue

 

to Sales

 

Amortization

 

Expense

 

(Income)/Loss

 

Total Assets

 

Expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

7,217

 

$

2,289

 

$

816

 

$

2,362

 

$

(1,320)

 

$

5,699

 

$

79

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

355

 

 

8,057

 

 

3,252

 

 

6,945

 

 

73

 

 

 

$

7,217

 

$

2,289

 

$

1,171

 

$

10,419

 

$

1,932

 

$

12,644

 

$

152

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

6,691

 

$

2,189

 

$

584

 

$

2,089

 

$

(3,330)

 

$

6,406

 

$

79

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

368

 

 

6,925

 

 

7,209

 

 

6,671

 

 

 2

 

 

 

$

6,691

 

$

2,189

 

$

952

 

$

9,014

 

$

3,879

 

$

13,077

 

$

81

 

All of the revenue for the two years presented was from the Company's Velardeña Properties in Mexico (see Note 16) and was all attributable to the lease of the oxide plant. 

22.Related Party Transactions

The following sets forth information regarding transactions between the Company (and its subsidiaries) and its officers, directors and significant stockholders. 

Sale of Equipment:

 

OnIn August 8, 2016, the Company sold certain mining equipment to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient, for $687,000 (see Note 8)9), in a transaction approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors. The equipment had a net book value of $27,000 resulting in a gain of $660,000. The gain is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  At the time of the sale and at December 31, 20162018, Sentient, heldthrough the Sentient executive funds, holds approximately 47%44% of the Company’s 88.995.6 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock. The equipment sold was excess equipment held at the Company’s Velardeña Properties that the Company doesdid not expect to use. The Company used a third party consultant with experience in the used mining equipment market in Mexico to determine a fair value. The Company believes the price paid was at least equal to the fair market value of the equipment had it been sold through auction or in the open market. The Company received $69,000 or 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale in August 2016, with the remaining $618,000remainder, plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, due in February 2017.  At December 31, 2016 the Company had recorded a receivable of $643,000 related to the sale, including accrued interest, included in “Related party receivable” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

With the approval of a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company expects to amendand Minera Indé amended the original equipment sale in Februaryon March 31, 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000.$185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the original equipment sale.  Upon execution of the amendment the Company expects to receivereceived an additional payment of $100,000, and the$100,000. The remaining principal and interest balance, as of February 2017 of $737,000, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, wouldwas amended to be due in August 2017. The Company recorded a gain of $105,000 on the sale of the additional equipment, included in “Other operating income” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, equal to the gross proceeds less the remaining basis in the equipment.  On May 2, 2017, the Company received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the equipment sale, including interest through that date.

 

F-37


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Administrative Services:

 

Beginning in August 2016, the Company began providing limited accounting and other administrative services to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient.  The services are provided locally in Mexico by the administrative staff at the Company’s Velardeña Properties. The Company charges Minera Indé $15,000 per month for the services, which provides reimbursement to the Company for its costs incurred plus a small profit margin. Amounts received under the arrangement reduce costs incurred for the care and maintenance of the Velardeña Properties and allows the Company to maintain a larger more experienced staff at the Velardeña Properties to support the oxide plant lease and potential future mining or processing activities. The Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee approved the agreement. For the periodyears ended December 31, 20162018 and 2017 the Company charged Minera Indé approximately $83,000$180,000 for services, offsetting costs that are recorded in “Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance” in the Consolidated Statements of OperationOperations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

Legal Services:

Since May, 2009 until her resignation on December 30, 2015, Deborah Friedman devoted approximately half of her time to serve as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and approximately half of her time to her legal practice at Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP (“DGS”) where she was a partner.  During 2015 the Company paid a monthly flat fee retainer of approximately $15,000 to DGS for approximately one half of Ms. Friedman’s time spent serving as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, which DGS subsequently remitted to Ms. Friedman, and the Company paid her customary hourly rate to DGS for any time spent by Ms. Friedman in excess of that threshold.  Although she was an executive officer of the Company for Section 16(a) reporting purposes under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ms. Friedman was not employed by the Company.  For the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company paid approximately $490,000 to DGS for legal services, including the amounts relating to Ms. Friedman described above, recorded in “Administrative expense” in the Company’s Consolidated

F-38


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Statements of Operation and Comprehensive Loss.  The Company has been advised by DGS that these amounts represented a de minimis amount of DGS’s total revenue for the year.  At December 31, 2015 the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets included in “Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities”  amounts owed to DGS of approximately $25,000.

24.Subsequent Events

Subsequent to December 31, 2016 the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 640,000 common shares under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.74 per common share for gross proceeds of approximately $475,000 during the year to date period ended February 24, 2017. The Company paid a 2% cash commission on the gross proceeds in the amount of approximately $10,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $2,000 (see Note 15).

F-39