Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10‑K10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020

 

or

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                          to                        

 

Commission file number 001‑15957001-15957

 

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

95‑418088395-4180883

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

21211 Nordhoff16640 Stagg Street,

 

 

Chatsworth,Van Nuys, California

 

9131191406

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(818) 734‑5300734-5300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

 

Name of exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $.001 per share

 

CPST

NASDAQ Capital Market

Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes    No 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes    No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes    No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑TS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes   No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S‑K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10‑K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer 

Accelerated filer 

Non‑accelerated filer 

Smaller reporting company 

Emerging growth company 

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes    No 

 

The aggregate market value of the shares of Common Stock of the registrant held by non‑affiliates on September 30, 20162019 was approximately $41.6$40.8 million.

 

As of June 6, 2017,24, 2020, there were 41,525,92310,984,783, shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s 20172020 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report to the extent described therein.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION

 

FORM 10‑K

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

Page

 

 

PART I

 

Item 1. 

 

Business

2

Item 1A. 

 

Risk Factors

1518

Item 1B. 

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

3240

Item 2. 

 

Properties

3240

Item 3. 

 

Legal Proceedings

3240

Item 4. 

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

3444

 

 

PART II

 

Item 5. 

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

3545

Item 6. 

 

Selected Financial Data

3645

Item 7. 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

3746

Item 7A. 

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

5464

Item 8. 

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

5464

Item 9. 

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

5465

Item 9A. 

 

Controls and Procedures

5565

Item 9B. 

 

Other Information

5666

 

 

PART III

 

Item 10. 

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

5666

Item 11. 

 

Executive Compensation

5666

Item 12. 

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

5666

Item 13. 

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

5666

Item 14. 

 

Principal Accounting Firm Fees and Services

5666

 

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. 

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

5767

Item 16. 

 

Form 10-K Summary

5767

 

 

 

 

 


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.  Business.

Overview

Capstone Turbine Corporation (“Capstone”, “We” or the “Company”) develops, manufactures, markets and services microturbine technology solutions for use in stationary distributed power generation and distribution networks applications, including energy efficient cogeneration (combinedcombined heat and power (“CHP”), integrated combined heat and power (“ICHP”), and combined cooling, heat and power (“CCHP”)), as well as renewable energy, natural resources, and critical power supply. In addition, our microturbines can be used as battery charging generators for hybrid electric vehiclesupply applications. Microturbines allow customers to produce power on siteon-site in parallel with the electric grid or stand-alone when no utility grid is available. Several technologies are used to provide “on site“on-site power generation” (also called “distributed generation”) such as reciprocating engines, solar photovoltaic power (“PV”), wind turbine systemsturbines and fuel cells. Our microturbines can be interconnected to other distributed energy resources to form “microgrids” (also called “distribution networks”) located within a specific geographic area and provide power to a group of buildings. For customers who do not have access to the electric utility grid, microturbines provide clean, on site power with fewer scheduled maintenance intervals and greater fuel flexibility than competing technologies. For customers with access to the electric grid, microturbines provide an additional source of continuous dutyon-site power generation, thereby providing additional reliability and potential cost savings.savings compared to the local utility. With our stand alonestand-alone feature, customers can produce their own energy in the event of a utility power outage and can use microturbines as their primary source of power for extended periods.periods of time unlike traditional diesel standby generator sets. Because our microturbines also produce clean, usable heat energy, they provide economic advantages to customers who can benefit from the use of hot water, chilled water, air conditioning and heating.steam. In addition, our microturbines have been used as battery charging generators for hybrid electric vehicles and to provide power to a vessel’s electrical loads in marine applications. Our microturbines are sold, installed and serviced primarily through our global distribution network. Together with our distributors, we offer new and remanufactured parts as well as a comprehensive Factory Protection Plan (“FPP”). through long-term service agreements ranging from 5 to 20 years.

As part of our long-term growth strategy, in January 2020, Capstone divided its sales and marketing team into two separate organizations. One stand-alone organization will remain focused on developing and managing the existing worldwide distribution channel and will lead all marketing and advertising activities as we continue building the Company into a strong and recognizable worldwide brand. The second stand-alone organization is responsible for growing the Company's national account business and long-term rental fleet. Additionally, this team will be responsible for business development, licensing, and new product partnerships. We will also continue to expand with new fuels, such as hydrogen and further growing our renewable market segment participation. We believe this new sales strategy, when combined with a positive adjusted EBITDA, will better enable us to capture more market share with large, global customers, where we see greater potential at dozens of their facilities worldwide. Our existing distribution network remains our worldwide feet-on-the-ground and our local presence, while the internal salesforce will build strong, long-term relationships with larger, more diverse customers.

We offer microturbines designed for commercial, industrial and utility usersonshore and offshore oil and gas applications with product offerings ranging from 30 kilowatts (“kW”) to one megawatt (“MW”) in electric power output.output, which can be deployed in arrays up to 10 MWs. Our microturbines combine patented air bearing technology, advanced combustion technology and sophisticated power electronics to form efficient and ultra-low emission electricity and cooling and heat production systems. Because of our air bearing technology, our microturbines do not require lube oil, grease, or coolant.traditional coolants. This means they do not require routine maintenance to change and dispose of lube oil, grease, or other liquid lubricants, as do the most common reciprocating engines. We also manufacture and supply controllers that provide complete automated system control, including load following and custom logic to protect against expensive local utility demand charges. These controllers include the legacy Capstone Logic Controllers (CLC) and the new Capstone PowerSync family of controllers.

Our microturbines can be fueled by various sources, including natural gas, propane, butane, various sour gas,gases, renewable fuels such as renewable natural gas, landfill gas, biogas or digester gas, kerosene, butane, diesel and biodiesel. Our

2

Table of Contents

microturbines are available with integrated unit mounted heat exchangers, making them easy to engineer and install in applications where hot water, chilled water, air conditioning and heatingsteam is used.desired.

We sell complete microturbine units, components, controllers and various accessories.accessories, as well as offer long-term microturbine rentals. We also remanufacture microturbine engines and provide new and remanufactured aftermarket spares parts, accessories, services, and services.comprehensive long-term service contracts from 5 to 20 years. Our microturbines are sold primarily through distributors and Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”). Distributors purchase our products for sale to end users and also provide service, application engineering and installation support. Distributors also provide a variety of additional services, including engineering, the applicationsapplication, and air permit support services in which the microturbines will be used, installation support of the products at the end users’ sites, commissioning the installed applications and providing post commissioning service, including a comprehensive FPP. Our distributors perform as independent value addedvalue-added resellers. OEMs integrate our products into their own product solutions.

This Annual Report on Form 10 K10-K (this “Form 10 K”10-K”) refers to our fiscal years ending March 31 as its “Fiscal” years.

Company Response to COVID-19

In March 2020, the Company began to monitor the global effects of “COVID-19,” an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) that was first detected in November 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China.

The subsequent spread of COVID-19 to the U.S. and many other parts of the world led the World Health Organization to characterize COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Thereafter, most U.S. states imposed “stay-at-home” orders on their populations to stem the spread of COVID-19. Of specific interest to the Company, stay-at-home orders were imposed in the state of California on March 20, 2020.

On March 23, 2020 the Company enacted a Business Continuity Plan in response to COVID-19. Beginning March 30, 2020, the Company furloughed approximately 52 employees, leaving behind only staff deemed essential for day-to-day administrative operations for a minimum period of 45 days. The Company’s Leadership Team volunteered to take a 25% temporary salary cut as well as the fiscal 2020 Executive Bonus in equity in lieu of cash if earned. In addition, approximately 25 other top company managers volunteered to take a similar 15% reduction in salary. Several employees returned to work June 1st, most with the 15% voluntary salary cuts, with others scheduled to return in a staggered manner through to the end of September. Additionally, in March 2020, the directors voted to take a temporary 25% reduction in base cash retainer in support of the Company’s Business Continuity Plan. As a result of the continued global economic slowdown due to COVID-19 and the associated decline in global crude oil prices, the Company eliminated 26 employees on June 1, 2020. During the period of March 30, 2020 to June 1, 2020, the Company had a limited production capability of new microturbine products, but had pre-built approximately 5.9 MW of microturbine finished goods during March 2020, for shipment during this period of suspended production. The Company continues to maintain a crew of essential operations employees to manufacture service engines, remanufacture spare parts and provide service spares in support of FPPs and global distributor spare parts orders. The Company’s vendor supply chain has been impacted by the pandemic, however it continues to be operational as of today. However, the Company is looking to minimize incoming inventory receipts to less than $6.0 million between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, in order to minimize cash burn, increase liquidity, and increase inventory turns with a goal of generating positive working capital during the first and second quarter of Fiscal 2021.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (the “CARES Act”), which, among other things, outlines the provisions of the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”). The Company determined that it met the criteria to be eligible to obtain a loan under the PPP because, among other reasons, in light of the COVID-19 outbreak and the uncertainty of economic conditions related thereto, the loan was necessary to support the Company’s ongoing operations. Under the PPP, the Company could obtain a U.S. Small Business Administration loan in an amount equal to the average of the Company’s monthly payroll costs (as defined under the PPP) for calendar 2019 multiplied by 2.5 (approximately 10 weeks of payroll costs). Section 1106 of the CARES Act contains provisions for the forgiveness of all or a portion of a PPP loan, subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements. The amount eligible for

3

Table of Contents

forgiveness is, subject to certain limitations, the sum of the Company’s payroll costs, rent and utilities paid by the Company during the eight-week period beginning on the funding date of the PPP loan.

On April 24, 2020, the Company closed on a PPP loan in the amount of $2,610,200, which was transferred by the Company into an account dedicated to allowable uses of the PPP loan proceeds. On May 13, 2020, the Company repaid $660,200 of the loan in accordance with the Fourth Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement between the Company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. 

The COVID-19 outbreak and the uncertainty of economic conditions relating thereto may negatively impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position; however, the overall financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Based on the operational and financial plans that management has developed, the Company expects to be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due over the next twelve months.

Products

Our 30 kW (“C30”) microturbine can produce enough electricity to power a small convenience store.store or cathodic protection for an oil or natural gas pipeline. The 65 kW (“C65”) microturbine can produce enough heat to provide hot water to a 100 room hotel while also providing about one third of its electrical requirements. Our 200 kW (“C200”) microturbine is well suited for larger hotels, office, commercial, and industrial buildings and wastewater treatment plants, among others. By packaging the C200 microturbine power modules into ansingle enclosures which are available in multiple sizes and are built in similar dimensions to a standard shipping container or International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) sized container,sizes, we have created aan upgradable family of microturbine offerings from 600400 kW up to one megawatt1000 kW or 1 MW in a compact footprint.footprint engineered to function as a single source of power. Our 600kW, 800kW400 kW, 600 kW, 800 kW and 1000 kW (“C1000C1000S Series”)

2


Table of Contents

microturbines are well suited for utility substations, larger commercial and industrial facilities and remote oil and gas applications. The 600 kW and 800 kW systems can be shipped in a five-bay configuration which allows the end-use customer to add one to two more 200 kW microturbines in the future to increase their total onsite power production from 600 kW to 1000 kW without any change to the existing site footprint, as their business power demands expand over time.

We began commercial sales of our C30 products in 1998, targeting the emerging distributed generation industry that was being driven by fundamental changes in power requirements. In September 2000, we shipped the first commercial unit of our 60 kW microturbine (“C60”), which was replaced by the C65 model during the quarter ended March 31, 2006. We began shipping the C60 ICHP solution in 2003. Our C60 microturbine was the first combustion power generation product to be certified by the CARBCalifornia Air Resources Board (“CARB”) as meeting its stringent distributed generation emissions standards that went into effect in 2003. The first commercial C200 microturbine was shipped on August 28, 2008. Our C1000 Series product was developed based on our C200 microturbine engine. The C1000 Series product can be configured into 1,000 kW, 800 kW, 600 kW and 600400 kW solutions in multiple sizes and are built in similar dimensions to a singlestandard shipping container or ISO sized container.sizes, and depending on the configuration, provides the opportunity for future expandability. The first commercial shipment of our C1000 Series product was on December 29, 2008. During Fiscal 2016, we unveiled our C1000 Signature (“C1000S’C1000S”) microturbine as part of our new C1000S microturbine energy systems which also includes an 800kW800 kW (“C800S”) or 600kW, a 600 kW (“C600S”), and a 400 kW (“C400S”) microturbine. The C1000S microturbine incorporates over 70 components, system and design upgrades intended to improve the overall product quality and enhance the microturbine ownership experience in all applications but specifically for CHP and CCHP applications. We began shipping the C200 and C1000 Signature Series ICHP solution in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

Our microturbines are compact, lightweight and environmentally friendly generators of electricity and heat compared to competing technologies. They operate on the same principle as a jet engine using a variety of commercially available fuels. For example, our microturbines can operate on low British Thermal Unit (“BTU”) gas, which is gas with lower energy content, and can also operate on gas with a high amount of sulfur, known in the industry as sour gas. Examples of these fuel sources include methane from facilities such as wastewater treatment plants, landfills and anaerobic digesters. Our microturbine’s multi fuelmicroturbines’ multi-fuel capability provides competitive advantages with respect to some of

4

Table of Contents

our selected vertical markets. The combustor system remains the same for all fuels except for the fuel injectors, which currently vary between liquid and multiple gaseous fuels.

Our microturbines incorporate four major design features: advanced combustion technology, patented air bearing technology, digital power electronics and proprietary remote monitoring systems.

Our advanced combustion technology allows our microturbines to achieve low emissions. Our natural gas fueled C65, C200S and C200C1000S series microturbines were certified by the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”)CARB as meeting its stringent 2007 emissions requirements—the same emissions standard used to certify fuel cells and the same emissions levels as a central power plant. Our C65 and C200 Landfill and Digester Gas systems were certified by the CARB as meeting its 2008 waste gas emissions requirements for landfill and digester gas applications. These low emission levels not only provide an environmentally friendly product, but also eliminate permitting requirements in several municipalities for continuously operated onsite power generation.

The patented air bearing system allows the microturbine’s single moving assembly to produce power without the need for typical petroleum basedpetroleum-based lubrication. Air bearings use a high pressure field of air rather than petroleum lubricants. This improves reliability and reduces maintenance such as oil changes.

The digital power electronics manage critical functions and monitor operations of the microturbine; our electronic controls manage the microturbine’s speed, temperature and fuel flow and communication with external networks and building management systems. The digital power electronics coordinate with the grid when the units are operated in a grid connect mode and with the onboard battery when equipped for standalone mode. The digital power electronics also include the functionality of seamless transfer capabilities, ensuring the end-users’ critical loads do not experience any interruption to their operation in the event of a utility power outage. All control functions are performed digitally. Performance is optimized, resulting in low emissions, high reliability and high efficiency over a variable power range.

Our proprietary Capstone Remote Monitoring Software (“CRMS”) allows end users to operate and manage the microturbine remotely. This remote capability can provide end users with power generation flexibility and cost savings.

Our electronic controls manage microturbines using our proprietary software and advanced algorithms. The controls start the turbogenerator and manage its load, coordinate the functioning of the microturbine with the grid,

3


Table of Contents

manage the speed, fuel flow and exhaust temperature of the microturbine, convert the variable frequency, up to a maximum of 1,600 Hertz and variable voltage power produced by the generator into a usable output of either 50 or 60 Hertz AC for stationary applications or DC for hybrid electric vehicle applications, and provide digital communications to externally maintain and control the equipment.

The electrical output of our units can be paralleled in multiple unit configurations through our Advanced Power Server product and a digital communications cable to serve larger installations requiring electrical loads up to ten megawatts. Our products can operate connected to the electric utility grid as a current source, on a standalone basis as a voltage source, multipacked to support larger loads as a “virtual single” unit and in dual mode, where the microturbine operates connected to the electric utility grid or operates independently.

We were the first microturbine manufacturer to achieve UL Class I, Division 2 certification and ATEX certification for operation in hazardous area oil and gas applications. These specially packaged systems are applied in oil and gas production areas with potentially explosive environments. Our C65, as well as our C200 and C1000 Signature Series grid connect and stand-alone microturbines are listed by Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”) as meeting the UL 2200 stationary engine generator standards and the UL 1741 utility interconnection requirements.

Our C30 and C60 microturbines are certified by the California Energy Commission and were the first products to comply with the requirements of its “Rule 21” grid interconnection standard. This standard streamlines the process for connecting distributed generation systems to the grid in California. The benefits of achieving this standard include avoiding both costly external equipment procurement requirements and extensive site by site and utility by utility

5

Table of Contents

analysis. Our protective relay functionality has also been recognized by the State of New York, which allows our microturbines to be connected to New York’s electric utility grid.

We offer various accessories for our products including rotary gas compressors with digital controls, integrated heat recovery modules for CHP applications, dual mode controllers that allow automatic transition between grid connect and stand-alone modes, batteries with digital controls for stand-alone or dual mode operations, power servers for large multipack installations, protocol converters for Internet access, packaging options and miscellaneous parts such as frames, exhaust ducting, backflow dampers and installation hardware.

Applications

Stationary power generation applications can vary greatly depending on load size and demand location. From small 2 kW back-up generators to several large 1,000 MW central generating facilities, stationary power systems can offer superior fuel efficiency for the customer while also meeting strict emissions regulations. Historically, power generation in developed countries such as the United States has been part of a regulated utility system. However, a number of developments related primarily to the deregulation of the utility industry as well as significant technology advances have helped to broaden the range of power supply options available to interested parties.

Our full line of microturbine energy solutions target multiple vertical markets worldwide, including energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural resources, critical power supply, transportationmicrogrid and marine.transportation. Within these vertical markets, we focus on applications that we believe have the greatest near termnear-term potential for the customer based on various different factors such as energy load demand, available fuels, economic payback and for some, government incentives. We also target smaller sub segments that fall within these vertical markets that may not otherwise be considered for on-site generation.

Energy Efficiency—CHP/CCHP

Energy efficiency refers to the proper utilization of both electrical and thermal energies in the power production process. In such applications, our microturbines are able to maximize the availability of usable energy which we believe provides a significant economic advantage to our customers while reducing their onsite emissions. CHP and CCHP can improve site economics by capturing the waste heat created from a single combustion process to increase the efficiency of the total system, from approximately 30 percent to 80approximately 85 percent for hot water and chilled water to as much as 90 percent or more.more for some steam and direct drying applications. Compared with more traditional, independent

4


Table of Contents

generation sources, the increase in operational efficiency also reduces greenhouse gas emissions through the displacement of other separate systems, which can also reduce operating costs.

When compared to onsite boilers, microturbines generally produce fewer commonly found air pollutants (“criteria pollutants”), such as nitrogen oxides (“NOx”), carbon monoxide (“CO”) and volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”). In fact, our CHP or CCHP system can displace local boiler emissions altogether. A high efficiency CHP or CCHP system can allow for reduced net utility costs for end users as well as improved fuel consumption. The most common uses for captured thermal energy include space heating and air conditioning, water heating and water chilling, direct-drying and steam for industrial applications. In CCHP applications, the microturbine exhaust drives an absorption chiller, which produces the chilled water necessary for air conditioning and local use. Organizations of all sizes have used the heat generated by our microturbines at the many different types of commercial and industrial applications they serve, including hotels and resorts, hospitals and medical centers, as well as office buildings and large retail facilities.

We offer fully integrated microturbine-powered CHP and CCHP solutions for installation in one of three modes: stand-alone, back-up and dual-mode. Each dual-mode microturbine can operate as a microgrid with the ability to run with or independent of a traditional grid or utility. The use of microgrids to serve local loads helps to reduce energy losses in transmission and distribution, further increasing the efficiency of the microgrid. Our microturbines have the ability to meet the needs of microgrid end-users by lowering their overall cost to operate and by providing a versatile technology that is fuel flexible and scalable enough to fit a wide variety of applications.

Renewable Energy

There is a growing transition to renewable energy sources and technologies on a global scale. Our microturbines run efficiently on renewable fuels such as methane and other biogases from landfills, wastewater treatment facilities and renewable natural gas.  They also run efficiently on other small biogas applications like food processing plants, livestock farms and agricultural green waste operations. Microturbines can burn these renewable fuels with minimal emissions, thereby, and in some cases, avoiding the imposition of penalties incurred for pollution while simultaneously producing electricity from this “free” renewable fuel source for use at the site or in the surrounding areas.

6

Table of Contents

Our microturbines have demonstrated effectiveness in these smaller applications and may outperform conventional combustion engines in some situations, including when the gas contains a high amount of sulfur.sulfur, as the sulfur can contaminate combustion engines lube oil leading to equipment breakdowns and higher lifecycle costs.

We introduced our C65 and C200 stand-alone digester products to the renewable energy market segment in 2007 and 2013, respectively. With these products, we are able to target many different types of renewable energy applications, including biogas producing facilities in third world countries and in remote locations that offer a valuable fuel source for the generation of electricity. The performance of our C65 digester gas system has been routinely evaluated to ensure that the combustion system is stable from 0 to 100 percent power output. Minor controls changes have been implemented to increase stability at low power levels. The ability to convert this low British Thermal Unit (“BTU”)BTU fuel to electricity along with the high reliability and low maintenance features of this product make it well suited for this market.

Natural Resources—Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Shale Gas & Mining

Our microturbines are installed in the natural resource market for use in both onshore and offshore applications, including oil and gas exploration, production, and at compression and transmission sites as a highly efficient and reliable source of prime power. In some cases, these oil and gas or mining operations have no electric utility grid and rely solely on power generated onsite. There are numerous locations, on a global scale, where the drilling, production, compression and transportation of natural resourcesoil and gas and other extraction and production processes create fuel byproducts, which are traditionally burned or released into the atmosphere. Our microturbines can turn these fuel byproducts, flare gas or associated gas, into a useable fuel to provide power to these remote oil and gas sites.

Major oil and gas companies are exploringdeveloping large shale reserves, or plays, in the United States. In 2010, we sold our firstWe have been shipping microturbines into the U.S. shale gas market at locations in the Eagle Ford and Marcellus shale plays.since 2010. The addressable market for our microturbines in this industry is significant. The shale gas market for microturbines may grow as demand for natural gas continues to rise and the U.S. as the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the

5


Table of Contents

Department of the Interior and other federal and state agencies work to reduce the emission of hazardous air pollutants associated with natural gas development. We have participated in several Natural Gas STAR workshopsdevelopment, including limitations on the flaring of excess gases. Our product sales in the United Statesnatural resources market is driven by our microturbines’ reliability, emissions profile and foreign markets to demonstrateease of installation. However, our growth in the emissions reductions its technology can provide.oil and gas sector within our natural resources market is primarily driven by oil prices. The company believes it will experience growth in this market when oil prices are sustained at or above $50.00 per barrel.

The C30, C65 and C200 microturbines can be configured to meet Class 1 Zone 2 hazardous location requirements for the natural resources market. Hazardous location requirements are met through package ventilation changes for purging and pressurizing package air to avoid potential flammable mixtures as well as controls for emergency disconnect of fuel and electrical sources. The package is upgraded to stainless steel construction to withstand the often corrosive offshore environments where these units are installed. Oil and gas customers often prefer power generation systems that offer low maintenance and high reliability in order to ensure continued production.

Critical Power Supply

Because of the potentially catastrophic consequences of system failure, momentary or otherwise, certain high demand power users, including high technology, health care and information systems facilities require higher levels of reliability in their power generation service. The majority of microturbine based distributed generation installations have powered through hurricanes with little or no downtime. To meet these customer requirements, traditional solutions utilize Uninterruptible Power Supplies (“UPS”) to protect critical loads from power disturbances along with back-up diesel generators for extended outages. We offer an alternative solution that can both meet customer reliability requirements and reduce operating costs. We have seen continued development in the critical market segment as it relates to heath care facilities.

We have developed the world’s only microturbine-powered UPS solutions that offer clean, IT grade power and can completely displace the need for traditional UPS and back-up diesel generators. We offer two UL listed microturbine powered UPS solutions: our UPSource microturbine powered solution, which provides a source for prime or emergency power; as well as our Hybrid UPS microturbine-powered solution, which provides power when dispatched in high

7

Table of Contents

efficiency, standard UPS and emergency power. Both critical power supply products offer eight nines of availability in an n+1 configuration when the product has at least one independent back-up source. This measurement of availability is used in the data center industry to refer to 99.999999% of reliability. These integrated solutions are idealwell suited for new facility construction or expansion and can be installed with absorption chillers or other heat recovery systems to obtain high efficiency levels while reducing operating costs, compared with traditional solutions.solutions and is a developing market segment for us.

Dual-mode units operating in a prime power configuration can support a 150 percent overload for up to 10 seconds during transient conditions. Dual-mode units operating in grid parallel mode can provide customers a back-up power system with an economic return. These systems offer high on-site energy efficiency when combined with a heat exchanger (CHP) to create hot water, or with a chiller (CCHP) for air conditioning at these facilities. This configuration, when combined with our Dual Mode Controller, can transition from the grid parallel mode to prime power mode in less than 10 seconds. Our microturbines can also be installed along with a rotary UPS to provide a complete line interactive continuous power solution. In this case, the microturbines remain in grid connect mode while the rotary UPS stabilizes the utility voltage and provides a seamless transfer from operation connected to the grid to operation isolated from the grid.

Microgrid

 A microgrid is a group of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources that acts as a single controllable energy entity with respect to the grid. Distributed energy resources typically include other dual-mode microturbines, reciprocating engines, PV, wind turbine, fuel cells and battery storage.  Microgrids can be connected to larger electricity grids; however, in the event of a widespread outage, the microgrid will disconnect from the main grid and continue to operate independently to maintain the electricity supply to the homes and businesses that are connected to the microgrid’s electricity network. Our microturbines have the ability to meet the needs of microgrid end-users by lowering their overall cost to operate and by providing a versatile dispatchable technology that is fuel flexible and scalable enough to fit a wide variety of applications.

Additionally, we have our own programmable logic control system and sensors, which interface with other building automation systems and these control systems are one of the key aspects of monitoring a microgrid. The use of microgrid to serve local loads helps to reduce energy losses in transmission and distribution, further increasing the efficiency of the microgrid. We have been a part of numerous successful microgrid installations worldwide ranging from a wind turbine manufacturer, ski resort, university, industrial farm, utility software company, brewery and an electrical distribution utility. Capstone microturbines functionality is to ensure energy availability for advanced microgrids before and during disasters, such as hurricanes. They may also help reduce electrical expenditures in the years following a disaster when electric utility rates may be increased to pay for the expenses for grid infrastructure repairs and improvements associated with these disasters. We have seen continued development in the microgrid market segment.

Transportation

Our technology also can be used in hybrid electric vehicle (“HEV”) applications. Our customers have applied our products in HEV applications such as transit buses and Class 7 and 8 work trucks. In these applications, the microturbine acts as an onboard battery charger to recharge the battery system as needed. The benefits of microturbine-powered HEV hybrids include extended range, fuel economy gains, quieter operation and reduced emissions when compared with traditional internal combustion engines. Internal combustion diesel engine manufacturers have been challenged for the last several years to develop technology improvements, prior to aftertreatment that reduce emissions to levels specified by the EPA and CARB 2007 and 2010 standards. Many manufacturers are incorporating aftertreatment that increases upfront equipment costs, vehicle weight and life cycle costs, which and may reduce overall engine efficiency.

68


Table of Contents

Marine

OurAdditionally, our technology canis also be used in marine applications. Our customers have applied our products in the commercial vessel and luxury yacht market segments. The most feasible application for our marine products is for use as a ship auxiliary generator set. In this application, the microturbines provide power to the vessel’s electrical loads and, in some cases, the vessel is able to utilize the exhaust energy to increase the overall efficiency of the application, reducing overall fuel consumption and emissions. Another feasible application is similar to our HEV application where the vessel is driven by an electric propulsion system and the microturbine serves as an on board battery charger and range extender. Our marine customers use both liquid fueled and natural gas microturbine products. Liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) is in its early stages as a marine fuel, and the number of vessels powered by LNG is forecasted to double every two years over the next decade. Vessel owners can receive the same benefits as users of stationary products: low emissions with no exhaust aftertreatment, long maintenance intervals, high reliability, low noise and no vibration. Transportation is a developing market segment for us. In Fiscal 2020, transportation products were only for customer demonstrations.

Sales and Marketing

We primarily sell and market our microturbine product, parts and service through our global network of authorized distributors and OEMs. a new direct sales team, which was formed in January 2020 to focus on OEMs and national accounts.

As part of our long-term growth strategy, in January 2020, Capstone divided its sales and marketing team into two separate organizations. One stand-alone organization will remain focused on developing and managing the existing worldwide distribution channel and will lead all marketing and advertising activities as we continue building the Company into a strong and recognizable worldwide brand. The second stand-alone organization is responsible for growing the Company's national account business and long-term rental fleet. Additionally, this team will be responsible for business development, licensing, and new product partnerships. We will also focus on new fuels, such as hydrogen and further growing our renewable market segment participation. We believe this new sales strategy, when combined with a positive adjusted EBITDA, will better enable us to capture more market share with large, global customers, where we see greater potential at dozens of their facilities worldwide. Our existing distribution network remains our worldwide feet-on-the-ground and our local presence, while the internal salesforce will build strong, long-term relationships with larger, more diverse customers.

Our worldwide distribution network was developed from the ground up and has become a valuable asset because we can reach end use customers globally. Each of our distributors is a strategically placed independent partner marketing, selling, and sellingproviding applications engineering support for our products and services on our behalf. In addition, distributors provide remote monitoring services, warranty support, local spare parts support, and customer training and long-term service support. Through our global distribution network, we offer a comprehensive FPP for a fixed annual fee to perform regularly scheduled and unscheduled maintenance as needed. We provide factory and onsite training to certify all personnel that perform sales, applications, commissioning and long-term service on our microturbines. Individuals who are certified are called Authorized Service Providers, and must be employed by a distributor or an end user in order to perform work pursuant to a FPP. The majority of our distributors provide these services. To assure proper application and installation of our microturbine systems, we offer an installer training and an application engineering certification program. We offer to assist all customers by reviewing their installation designs in relation to the technical requirements for proper operation of our products, such as electrical interconnections, load requirements, fuel type and pressure, cooling air flow and turbine exhaust routing. As part of the microturbine commissioning process, we also receive a checklist to confirm that the final installation adheres to our technical requirements before we accept anyour standard manufacturer warranty obligations. Our typical terms of sale include shipment of the products with title, care, custody and control transferring at our dock, payment terms ranging from full payment in advance of shipment to payment in 90 days, and warranty periods of approximately 15 to 24 months from shipment depending on the product type. We typically do not have customer acceptance provisions in our agreements.

Effective January 1, 2018, we launched our Distributor Support System (“DSS program”) to provide additional support for distributor business development activities, customer lead generation, brand awareness and tailored marketing services for each of our major geography and market vertical. This new program is funded by our distributors and was developed to provide improved worldwide distributor training, sales efficiency, website development, company branding and funding for increased strategic business-to-business marketing activities.

9

Table of Contents

During Fiscal 2016, we launched Capstone Energy Finance, a joint venture that provides financing options for the purchase of our microturbines. Capstone Energy Finance provides end users with the ability to purchase electricity generated by our microturbine at their facility with no upfront capital investment and expand access to clean and reliable onsite energy. A power purchase agreement from Capstone Energy Finance enables organizations to reduce operating expenses by allowing them to buy electricity at a rate that is lower than what they currently pay today. Customers can purchase all or a portion of their energy from Capstone Energy Finance and eliminate exposure to volatile utility rates by locking in a fixed rate for a period of ten to twenty years. Capstone Energy Finance monitors and maintains the system for the entire term of the agreement, and customers pay only for the energy they use. We believe financing solutions offered by Capstone Energy Finance willcan help reverse recent trends in our sales to the oil and gas industry by allowing new and existing end users who have been impacted by low oil pricesend-users evaluate their purchasing options and provide a solution to install systems which will immediately improve their bottom line without requiring capital investment in new equipment. We are developing accessThe adoption rate of the Capstone Energy Finance solution has been slower than we expected because our customers continue to a streamlinedutilize other financing solution can also be expected in the futureoptions or elect to improve the pace of growth in the CHP market.pay directly for our microturbines.

United States and Canada

We have distribution agreements with a number of companies throughout North America for the resale of our products. Many of these distributors serve multiple markets in their select geographic regions. The primary markets served in this region have been energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural resources, critical power, microgrid and mobiletransportation products. The energy efficiency and natural resources vertical markets are expected to grow as a result of an increased domestic production of hydrocarbons, the low downstream price of natural gas, as well as public and regulatory acceptance of distributed generation.

7


Table of Contents

In developing our sales opportunities we have identified the need to address various requirements present in our target localities. These requirements include electric grid interconnection standards, gas utility connection requirements, emissions standards, building and fire safety codes and various inspections and approvals. The costs and scheduling ramifications of these various approvals, in conjunction with normal bidding process requirements and construction delays, can be significant to the completion of an installation. Our goal is to work with the applicable regulating entities to establish compliant standards for the installation of our microturbines so that the costs and installation timelines are minimized for our customers.

Latin America

Our target markets in Latin America are energy efficiency, renewable energy and natural resources. Oil and gas production projects continue to be a growing market in Latin America.

Energy reform in Mexico, for example, has opened new market opportunities for us by allowing competition among multiple players and enabling power generation companies to sell directly to consumers instead of only to the state‑owned Federal Electricity Commission. Our strategy is to leverage our distribution network in Mexico across various market verticals.

South America constitutes a diverse group of markets that vary greatly in potential capture for us based on a number of factors, including availability of oil and gas production and transmission, energy pricing and political and investment climate. While we have distributors in nearly all South American countries, our management is focused on what we consider to be the top geographical markets, such as Colombia, Brazil, ChileBolivia, and Ecuador.Chile.

Asia and Australia

Our target markets in Asia and Australia are energy efficiency, renewable energy and natural resources. Our historical sales in Southeast Asia and Australia have primarily been in the energy efficiency and the oil and gas markets. Other areas in Asia and the Pacific Rim offer attractive opportunities as well. China is expected to see growth in the oil and gas market, while biogas recovery is showing signs of growth in Southeast Asia.

10

Table of Contents

Middle East and Africa

Our target market in the Middle East and Africa is primarily oil and gas. This includes flare gas to power projects which are a particularly attractive market opportunity given the volume of gas being flared and the acute and chronic need for stable power in the region. Our management has targeted distributors and customers involved in the capture and use of flare gas in the oil and gas market. However, the geopolitical environment in this region is still volatile, which can have an impact on our sales.

Europe and Russia

To address the European market, including Russia, we are strengthening our relationships with existing and new distributors and have increased local sales and service support. We have an office in Europe for the purpose of working with our local distributors on a daily basis to identify and understand growth opportunities. We have established a spare parts distribution centerrecently upgraded Integrated Remanufacturing Facility (IRF) in Europethe United Kingdom to make new and remanufactured parts readily available to our distributors. Europe has a history of extensive use of distributed generation technologies. We continue to diversify the company’s overall presence in Russia and the surrounding Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) as we explore new growth opportunities in these areas with multiple new distributors. The rebuilding of our business in Russia and the surrounding CIS area continues to evolve including the addition of our new Russia oil and gas distributor Arman Energo. Further, the continuation or escalation of the current geopolitical instability in Russia and Ukraine could continue to negatively impact our operations, sales, and future growth prospects in that region. For more information, see “Risk Factors” beginning on Page 1518 of this Form 10‑K.

Revenue

For geographic and segment revenue information, please see Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Segment Reporting in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

8


Table of Contents

Customers

Sales to E‑Finity Distributed Generation, LLC (“E‑Finity), one of our domestic distributors, accounted for 14% and 11% of our revenue for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Sales to Horizon Power Systems (“Horizon”Finity”), one of our domestic distributors, accounted for 11%12% and 15%13% of our revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Sales to DTC Soluciones Inmobiliarias S.A. de C.V.Cal Microturbine (“DTC”CAL”), one of our Mexicandomestic distributors, accounted for 10%12% of our revenue for the year ended March 31, 2016. Sales to Optimal Group Australia Pty Ltd (“Optimal”), one of our Australian distributors,2019. Additionally, E-Finity accounted for 10%14% of our revenue for the year endednet accounts receivable as of March 31, 2016. Additionally, E-Finity, DTC and2020. Reliable Secure Power Systems, (“RSP”), one of our domestic distributors, and E-Finity, accounted for 29%, 12%14% and 10%, respectively, of net accounts receivable as of March 31, 2017. DTC, Optimal, RSP,2019.

On October 13, 2017, we entered into an Accounts Receivable Assignment Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) and Regale Energy Zrt,Promissory Note (the “Note”) with Russian distributor Turbine International, LLC (“TI”). 

Pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, we agreed to assign to TI the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC Engineering, our Hungarianformer Russian distributor (“Regale”BPC”), accounted for 28%, 11%, 10% and 10%, respectively,upon TI’s payment to us of net accounts receivable$2.5 million in three payments by February 1, 2018. We received payments from TI of approximately $1.0 million under the Assignment Agreement during Fiscal 2018 which was recorded as bad debt recovery. The receivables owed to us from BPC had a balance of $4.8 million as of March 31, 2016.2019, and this balance was fully reserved.

On October 13, 2017, we and Hispania Petroleum, S.A. (the “Guarantor”), entered into a Guaranty Agreement (the “Guaranty Agreement”) whereby the Guarantor guarantees TI’s obligations under the Agreement and Note. However, due to our limited business relationship with TI and the missed payments on the Assignment Agreement, we deferred recognition of the Assignment Agreement and Note until collectability is reasonably assured.  

In connection with the terms of the Note, we granted TI the sole distribution rights for our products and services in the Russian oil and gas sector. As a result of this appointment, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 35 equal monthly installments starting in August 2018.

On June 5, 2018, we entered into an amendment to the Assignment Agreement (the “Amended Assignment Agreement”) and the Note (the “Amended Note”) with TI. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Assignment Agreement, the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC will be contingent upon TI’s payment to us of the remaining approximately $1.5 million in five payments by September 20, 2019. Under the terms of the Amended Note, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 13 equal quarterly installments starting on December

11

Table of Contents

20, 2019. The payments of $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million, due March 20, 2019, June 20, 2019, and September 20, 2019, respectively, under the Amended Assignment Agreement, have not been received at the time of this filing. In September 2019, we sent TI a notice to cure default with a deadline of October 31, 2019. TI failed to cure the noticed default and we have since terminated TI’s distributor agreement. As a result, the BPC accounts receivable and related accounts receivable reserve of $4.8 million were written off.

We recorded a net bad debt expense of approximately $0.4 million during Fiscal 2020 primarily due to the uncertainty of collections from certain distributors during the COVID-19 pandemic. We recorded a net bad debt recovery of approximately $0.3 million during Fiscal 2019. As of September 30, 2019, we collected cumulatively approximately $1.8 million from BPC on their previously reserved accounts receivable. Additionally, we collected cumulatively approximately $1.5 million during eachfrom TI, under the terms of Fiscal 2017the Assignment Agreement and 2016. During Fiscal 2015, we recorded approximately $7.1 million and $2.6 million with respect to the Amended Assignment Agreement. The BPC accounts receivable allowances from BPC Engineering (“BPC”), oneand related accounts receivable reserve of our Russian distributors and Electro Mecanique Industries (“EMI”), one$4.8 million were written off as of our distributors in the Middle East and Africa, respectively.March 31, 2020.

Competition

The market for our products is highly competitive. Our microturbines compete with existing technologies such as reciprocating engines and compete with emerging distributed generation technologies, including solar-powered systems, wind‑powered systems, fuel cells and other microturbines. Many potential customers rely on the utility grid for their electrical power. Many of our distributed generation competitors are large, well‑established companies that derive competitive advantages from production economies of scale, worldwide presence, brand recognition and greater resources which they can devote to product development or promotion.

Often power purchased from the electric utility grid can be less costly than power produced by distributed generation technologies. Utilities may also charge fees to interconnect to their power grids. However, we can provide economic benefits to end users in instances where the waste heat from our microturbine has value (CHP and CCHP), where fuel costs are low (renewable energy/renewable fuels), where the costs of connecting to the grid may be high or impractical (such as remote power applications), where reliability and power quality are of critical importance, or in situations where peak shaving could be economically advantageous because of highly variable electricity prices. Because our microturbines can provide a reliable source of power and can operate on multiple fuel sources, our management believes we offer a level of flexibility not currently offered by other technologies such as reciprocating engines.

Our reciprocating engine competitors have products and markets that are well developed and technologies that have been proven for some time. A reciprocating engine, also known as an internal combustion engine, is similar to those used in automotive applications. Reciprocating engines are popular for primary and back-up power applications despite higher levels of emissions, noise and maintenance. These technologies, which in many cases have a lower up front cost than microturbines, are currently produced by Caterpillar Inc., Cummins Inc. (which recently entered into a joint venture with Eaton), GEInnio who recently bought the General Electric Gas Engines (whichEngine business, which now includes Waukesha and Jenbacher),Jenbacher gas engines, MAN SE, and Tecogen, Inc. (which now includes American DG Energy Inc.), among others.

Our microturbines may also compete with other distributed generation technologies, including solar-powered systems, wind-powered systems, fuel cells and fly wheel. Solar and wind powered systems produce no emissions.emissions and benefit from above market contracts provided by state mandates. The main drawbacks to solar and wind powered systems areis that they may not be dispatchable because of their dependence on weather conditions, the utility grid andor high capital costs that can often make these systems uneconomical without government subsidies depending upon geographic locale and application of the technology. Although the market for fuel cells is still developing, a number of companiesfuel cell providers are also focused on markets similar to ours, including Active Power Inc. (a division of Piller Power Systems Inc.), Ballard Power Systems Inc., Bloom Energy Corporation, FuelCell Energy Inc., LG Fuel Cell Systems, a business unit of LG Electronics, and Plug Power Inc. Fuel cells have slightly lower levels of NOx, CO, VOCs and other criteria pollutant emissions than our microturbines. Fuel cells, like solar and wind powered systems, historically have received higher levels ofWith equivalent government incentives, microturbines would provide a better economic value to end users in most applications.

912


Table of Contents

incentives for the same type of applications as microturbines. Management believes that, absent these higher government incentives, microturbines provide a better value to end users in most applications.

We also compete with other companies who have microturbine products, including FlexEnergy and Turbec S.p.A.

Overall, we compete with end users’ other options for electrical power and heat generation on the basis of our microturbine’s ability to:

·

provide power when a utility grid is not available or goes out of service;

·

reduce total cost of purchasing electricity and fuel;

·

improve electric power availability and provide high power quality;

·

operate on multiple fuel types;

·

reduce emissions (both criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases);

·

simplify operation; and

·

control maintenance costs and associated disposal of hazardous materials.

Governmental and Regulatory Impact

Our markets can be positively or negatively impacted by the effects of governmental and regulatory matters. We have systems installed in 73 countries around the world, each of which has their own policy and regulatory framework, which are subject to change. We are affected not only by energy policy, laws, regulations and incentives of governments in the markets in which we sell, but also by rules, regulations and costs imposed by utilities. Utility companies or governmental entities may place barriers on the installation or interconnection of our product with the electric grid. Further, utility companies may charge additional fees to customers who install on‑site power generation; thereby reducing the electricity they take from the utility, or for having the capacity to use power from the grid for back‑up or standby purposes. These types of restrictions, fees or charges could hamper the ability to install or effectively use our product, or increase the cost to our potential customers for using our systems. This could make our systems less economical, thereby adversely affecting our revenue and profitability. In addition, utility rate reductions can make our products less competitive which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. These costs, incentives and rules are not always the same as those faced by technologies with which we compete. However, rules, regulations, laws and incentives could also provide an advantage to our distributed generation solutions as compared with competing technologies if we are able to achieve required compliance in a lower cost, more efficient manner. Additionally, reduced emissions and higher fuel efficiency could help our customers combat the effects of climate change. Accordingly, we may benefit from increased government regulations that impose tighter emission standards particularly on burning coal and fuel oil and fuel efficiency standards.as long as gas combustion technology solutions are not excluded.

We continue to engage with federal and state policymakers to develop government programs to promote the deployment of our low emission and energy efficient products. Government funding can impact the rate of development of new technologies or improvements to existing technologies. We continue to engage with federal and state policymakers to support government programs that promote the deployment of our low emission and energy efficient products. Competing new technologies have historically received larger incentives and development funding than do microturbines. TheHowever, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) has encouraged collaboration by U.S. small businesses with national lab researchers throughcontinues to fund the Small Business Vouchers pilot program. Wedevelopment of cost-effective, high efficiency CHP that is responsive to site demands and grid requirements. Flexible CHP could provide additional generating capacity when grid demand increases or renewable resources are one of 114 American small businesses participatingnot available as well as other grid services, like frequency regulation, to keep the grid stable. As more intermittent renewable resources are added to the electric grid, grid operators need access to additional dispatchable generation capacity to ensure an adequate and stable power supply. Capstone’s PowerSync controller could provide this automated response capability to allow for participation in this program, which provides assistance in identifying national lab research and development activities that align with our interests.grid services markets, where permitted.

TheIn the United States, a 10% Federal Investment Tax Credit (“ITC”) for certain clean energy technologies, including CHP and microturbines and fuel cells among others, expired atis available through the end of calendar year 2016.2021. In addition, bonus depreciation rules allow businesses to immediately deduct 100% of eligible

13

Table of Contents

property placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023. The deduction limit will phase down from 100% to 0% by 2027. As a result, we may see ana positive impact on our sales in the United States due to the lossavailability of this 10% tax credit.credit and bonus depreciation. However, other CHP and gas-firedgas-powered distributed

10


Table of Contents

energy technology-providers will facealso benefit from the same financial hurdlereturn of these tax incentives, and, the loss of the ITC would level the playing field with fuel cell technologies which had receivedwill receive a 30% ITC.ITC level with a phase down to 22% by 2022 and expiration in 2023. At the state level, slow approvals for natural gas pipeline infrastructure may impact gas availability in some areas, and efforts to incentivize building electrification over natural gas-fueled heat and power sources may inhibit sales. However, electricity demand spikes may also lead to higher electricity prices thereby improving project economics for on-site distributed power generation.

U.S. Government export promotion activities helpIn global markets, European governments continue to support exportsefficient CHP and are beginning to take action on reducing local air pollution through regulations like the EU’s Medium Combustion Plant and EcoDesign Directives. Our low emission systems’ ability to meet these programs’ requirements may have a positive impact on our sales as implementation progresses. In the oil and gas market, many producers have committed to reduce methane emissions from their operations. Our low maintenance, reliable systems and our ability to run on a range of American products to foreign markets. We participatefuels could fit their needs and result in one of the U.S. Department of Commerce export promotion activities, Single Company Promotions, which helps us enter new markets by facilitating interactions with foreign buyers and distributors.a positive impact on our sales.

Sourcing and Manufacturing

We are focused on continuously improving our supply chain effectiveness, strengthening our manufacturing processes and increasing operational efficiencies within our organization. Our manufacturing designs include the use of conventional technology, which has been proven in high volume automotive and turbocharger production for many years. Many components used in the manufacture of our products are readily fabricated from commonly available raw materials or off the shelf items available from multiple supply sources; however, certain items are custom made to meet our specifications that require longer lead time. We believe that in most cases, adequate capacity exists at our suppliers and that alternative sources of supply are available or could be developed within a reasonable period of time. However, single source suppliers with long lead times may be more challenging to transition to another supplier. We have an ongoing program to develop alternative back up suppliers for sole source parts wherever possible.possible, however this has been challenging with low production volumes and increased pricing. We regularly reassess the adequacy and abilities of our suppliers to meet our future needs. We continue to evaluate and implement new systems designed to provide improved quality, reliability, service, greater efficiency and lower supply chain costs.

During Fiscal 2020, we focused significant efforts on establishing additional long-term partnerships with several key vendors while consolidating and vertically integrating within our supply chain. We have located and qualified several new suppliers where previous single points of failure have occurred in past years. We have established and qualified dual source vendors for several critical long-lead time components which should mitigate the risks of supply chain interruptions in the future. Throughout the year, we have focused on several cost-reduction initiatives designed to reduce overall aftermarket and product costs to improve our operating cash position. Later in Fiscal 2020, we became aware of the COVID-19 pandemic and fully assessed our supply chain, determining that the sourcing controls and measures we put in place were adequate in helping prevent an interruption. While the COVID-19 situation remains fluid, we continue to put measures in place in the form of safety stocks and dual sourcing to prevent potential interruptions to the supply chain. 

During Fiscal 2019, we identified a defect in one of the component parts for microturbine systems from one of our single source suppliers. As a result of this defect we have identified several new suppliers with greater engineering expertise and robust quality management systems. The transition is complex, lengthy and may result in an interruption in our manufacturing process.  An interruption in our manufacturing process for this component part would adversely impact our results of operations. The efforts to qualify and dual source these components was completed in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019.

During Fiscal 2018, we received notification from one of our single source suppliers that they were at maximum capacity and would require prepayment and a significant increase in the price of multiple components in order to fulfill our supply requirements for Fiscal 2019. Due to their capacity issues, it is uncertain if we will experience an interruption in parts from this supplier or be able to fully offset or recover any resulting component price increases.

14

Table of Contents

During Fiscal 2019, we issued a prepayment of approximately $2.2 million to this single source supplier. A new supplier has been fully qualified and has taken over as the primary source of this commodity for Capstone.

We have substantially increased our focus on process controls and validations, supplier controls, distribution controls and providing our operations teams with the training and tools necessary to drive continuous improvement in product quality. In addition, we remain focused on examining our operations and general business activities to identify cost improvement opportunities in order to enhance our operational effectiveness and use lean manufacturing processes. Our ability to leverage these capabilities may be affected by the current variability in our demand volumes and forecasting. Our demand volumes and forecasting could continue to be negatively impacted by the volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar (making our products more expensive overseas), tariffs and/or import taxes, and ongoing global geopolitical tensions in Russia, North Africa and the Middle East.tensions. Our strategy is to identify primary and secondary sources for critical components, both domestic and international, for when available to minimize production line down time due to unavailability of such parts, which could affect our ability to meet manufacturing schedules on build or a linear basis. In April 2019, we executed multiple new Long Term Agreements (“LTA”) including a new 10-year LTA with a new supplier. The LTA from the new supplier will initially reduce annual direct material costs an estimated $2 million per year once the transition is completed. The strategy to reduce direct material costs is based on partnering with our supply base to drive collaborative cost improvements within its value chain which will enable the significant material cost reductions.

Solar Turbines Incorporated (“Solar”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc., was our sole supplier of recuperator cores prior to 2001. In 2000, we exercised an option to license Solar’s technology, which allows us to manufacture these cores ourselves and we began manufacturing them in June 2001. We are required to pay a per unit royalty fee over a seventeen-year periodfor the life of Capstone’s patents for cores manufactured and sold by us using the technology. Royalties of approximately $32,100$26,400 and $35,000$33,200 were earned by Solar for the fiscal yearsyear ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

In 2007, we entered into a Development and License Agreement (“Development Agreement”) with Carrier Corporation (“Carrier”) regarding the payment of royalties on the sale of each of our C200 microturbines. On July 25, 2018, we and Carrier entered into a Second Amendment whereby we agreed to pay Carrier approximately $3.0 million to conclude our current royalty obligation under the Development Agreement and release us from any future royalty payment obligations. The Second Amendment also removed non-compete provisions from the Development Agreement, allowing us to design, market or sell our C200 System in conjunction with any energy system and compete with Carrier products in the CCHP market. On September 19, 2018, we paid in full the negotiated royalty settlement agreement of $3.0 million to Carrier, as such there is no further royalty obligation to Carrier. Carrier earned $0.9 million and $1.2$0.4 million in royalties for C200 and C1000 Series system sales during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which will continue until the obsolescence of the C200 microturbine product line.2019.

We have a combined total ofan approximately 102,00042,300 square foot manufacturing footprint in our Van Nuys location in Southern California, running on a single shift in the San Fernando Valley area of Southern California. We assemble and test units our C30 and C65 microturbines at our facility in Chatsworth, California. Additionally, we assemble and test our C200 and C1000 Series products and manufacture recuperator cores at our facility in Van Nuys, California. We are in the process of consolidating our manufacturing processes into our Van Nuys location.shift. We believe that once this is complete we will have aour production capacity goal of approximately 2,000 units per year, depending on product mix. We believe wemix is well above our current production rates and will be able to support this production capacity levelachievable by adding additional shifts which wouldshifts. This may require an increase in working capital requirements and making some additional capital expenditures. Additionally, once the consolidation is complete we will be looking to sublet all or a portion of our facility in Chatsworth.

11


Table of Contents

expenditures when necessary.

Research and Development (“R&D”)

We have historically devoted substantial resources toOur engineering mission has been on supporting the developmentexpansion of newour existing suite of products, focusing on alternative fuels and technologies, maintaining relevance in the improvementglobal evolution of existing products. More recently, due to our cost reduction efforts, our focus is on expanding the existing products, includinggrid interconnection requirements, and the launch of our C1000 Signature Series microturbine in December 2015.the PowerSync Controller. We focus our engineering efforts on coordinating our product design and manufacturing processes to bring our products to market in a cost-effective and timely manner. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, R&D expenses were $5.4$3.6 million and $10.2 million, respectively,in each year, which amounts are equivalent to 7%5% and 12%4% of total revenue, respectively, for these fiscal years. R&D expenses are reported net of benefits from cost‑sharing programs, such as DOE grants. There were no benefits from cost-sharing programs for Fiscal 2017. Benefits from cost‑sharing programs were $0.2 million for Fiscal 2016. Our R&D activities enabled us to become one of the first companies to develop a commercially available microturbine that operates in parallel with the grid. We were the first company to successfully demonstrate a commercially available microturbine that operates on a stand‑alone basis.

During Fiscal 2017, we continued to make progress with our product development roadmap despite a 47% reduction in our R&D expenses compared to Fiscal 2016. Our product development activities during Fiscal 2017 included new-patented fuel injector2019 continued with the launch of the new family of PowerSync controllers used for Capstone microturbines. In Fiscal 2020 we completed the development and qualification of a new self-cleanable severe environment air filtration system for our Signature Series line of microturbine products.

15

Table of Contents

Capstone has also embarked upon a project to modernize control electronics, providing common functionality, minimizing near term obsolescence concerns, and enabling long term support.

Phoenix Contact and Capstone partnered in a joint effort to improve on-site controls and integration with end-use customer facilities. The main objectives of developing the new PowerSync controller line were to further increase system reliability, availability and make Capstone microturbines easier to use for both end-user customers as well as Capstone distribution partners. Fiscal 2019 marked the first substantial integration of the PowerSync at a number of customer sites.  From these integration and commissioning activities, Capstone and Phoenix Contact took feedback to make further improvements to software and hardware. The goal of such improvements is to make the whole process easier and more straightforward.

Our new self-cleanable severe environment air filtration system for our line of Signature Series microturbine products was launched during Fiscal 2019. During sand and dust storms common to most hot arid desert areas, particulate concentrations close to the ground can reach levels 20,000 times those in typical U.S. cities. Such dust and dirt loads can cripple conventional air filtration systems, cause massive maintenance expenditures and allow excessive dust concentrations to be ingested by the turbine. Capstone’s new cleanable severe environment units employ industry standard high-efficiency filters. The systems feature self-cleanable pulse actuation to extend life and service interval, critical for remote sites. In Fiscal 2020 we delivered two C600 systems with the self-cleanable filtration to a new customer in the Middle East.

Our C65, C200 and C1000 Series microturbines became UL 1741 Supplement A (SA) certified during Fiscal 2019. This testing standard was written in response to California Rule 21, and in response to the local increased presence of distributed generation and require interactive grid support functions.  Capstone benefitted substantially from previous certification successes for the German and Italian markets to expedite conformance to UL 1741 SA.  Certification standards are becoming increasingly commonplace globally, with localization of controls and requirements.  In Fiscal 2020, Capstone achieved Australian AS4777 certification for our C200 product line, and UK G99 Grid Interconnect type approval for C65 microturbine to applicable European Union medium voltage grid interconnection standards.and C200 product lines.  In addition, weGermany released VDE 4110 for Medium Voltage Grid Interconnection, to augment the BDEW certification.  Capstone achieved “Prototype Confirmation” for this new specification that enables continued our developmentoperability in our C200S ICHP microturbineGermany.

In Fiscal 2019, Capstone was issued two patents related to fuel injection and overall cost reductionemissions. The first patent issued is for our new Signature Series.

We developed a new-patented multi-staged lean pre-vaporizing, pre-mixing fuel injector providing ultra-low emissions that meet EPA Tier 4 requirements for power generation. Under this new program, exhaust emissions from these engines will be required to decrease by more than 90%. The second patent is for a multiple-fuel capable, pre-mixed, low emission injector for high flame speed fuel combustion.  This patent is the foundation for continued development in achieving high reliability and performance with hydrogen content fuels.

Our C65, C200 and C1000 Series microturbines became Verband der Elektrotechnik (“VDE”) and Bundesverband der Energie - und Wasserwirtschaft (“BDEW”) and Comitato Electtrotecnico Italiano (“CEI”) certified during Fiscal 2017. These new standards were attained following the development and implementation of new microturbine system software architecture.

The C200S microturbine incorporates numerous system and design upgrades intended to improve overall product quality, reliability, and performance. Our new C200S ICHP product further supports our effort to diversify our business into the CHP and CCHP energy efficiency markets, and the new roof mounted integrated CHP heat recovery modules designed specifically for our new Signature Series product we aim to add additional revenue opportunities.

We developed new partnershipspartnership with the DOE inprovided funding during Fiscal 2017 whereby, the DOE will provide funding in the amount of $335,000 for one year to Argonne National Laboratory to conduct hydrogen and synthetic fuel or syngas testing on our C65 and C200 microturbines. Hydrogen testing was on hold while the test facility implemented mechanisms for safe handling, detection, and delivery of the hydrogen gas. The newsafety challenges have been resolved and testing has begun. Despite a challenging federal budgetary environment, funding has been extended to the 2020 government fiscal year for completion of the testing.

Capstone Turbine continues support of the University of California, Irvine (“UCI”) through their Advanced Power and Energy Program, to evaluate Microturbine operation using hydrogen and natural gas fuel injection technology could enable our microturbines to run on an expanded range of fuels that are not currently widely used, but have the potentialblends.  The testing to be a sourceperformed in Fiscal 2021 is sponsored by the local gas authority as they evaluate the impacts of power generation with widely varying compositions, such as gasified industrial waste streams. In addition, we continued progress on our flexible fuels program, with recent successful testing on butane.gas grid hydrogen injection.  Capstone and UCI continue to be key partners in advancing academic research while enabling commercialization of technology.

We partnered with FGC Plasma Solutions to test a new plasma-assisted fuel injection technology in our C65 microturbine. We workworked together to develop a new combustion concept for improved turbine efficiency and emissions performance. The technology willcould enable more optimum operation of the engine as well as benefits from lower

16

Table of Contents

emissions, increased fuel flexibility and improved reliability. Testing willwas completed in early Fiscal 2020 and results were positive whereby the solution could be held atimplemented into our microturbine without adverse effects.

Capstone and Argonne National Laboratory.

During Fiscal 2016, we unveiled our C1000 Signature (“C1000S’)Laboratory are also partnering on a microturbine as partderivative utilizing Argonne’s high-efficiency, fast-charging, and fast discharging Thermal Energy Storage System.  This effort is funded through the Department of our new C1000S microturbine energy systems which also includes an 800kW (“C800S”) or 600kW (“C600S”) microturbine.Energy’s Technology Commercialization Fund. The C1000S microturbine incorporates over 70 components,thermal storage system and design upgrades intendedis expected to improve the microturbine’s overall product qualityefficiency increasing value to the customer. The Thermal Energy Storage System modeling and enhancesimulation was completed towards the microturbine ownership experience in all applications but specifically for CHPend of Fiscal 2020.  A review was conducted and CCHP applications. A fewthe design of a prototype, small scale, system was decided.  Fiscal 2021 will see the assembly of the key upgrades include integrated heat recovery for CHPsmall scale system and CCHP applications, two-stage air filtration system, improved enclosure, relocated engine exhaust stack and redesigned discharge for enclosure cooling air. The C1000S is one of the worlds most integrated and compact 1MW CHP solutions. The 8-foot wide by 30-foot long

12


Table of Contents

1MW power plant reaches approximately 82% total system efficiency and is significantly quieter than the original C1000 for installation in low-noise urban environments.model validation performed at Argonne using their C65 test system. 

In addition, we continue to work both cost reduction and performance enhancement activities to improve the value of our microturbine products for our customer base. Cost reduction activities are focused on leveraging the capabilities of our supply base and internal design lean manufacturing improvements. Product enhancements are focused on reducing the already very low maintenance requirements for our products, while at the same time improving operational efficiency, thereby reducing our customers’ total cost of ownership.

Because of our single moving assembly, manufacturers believe there is also the opportunity to produce a lower cost product in larger automotive volumes. Our focus is on a next generation product that would include existing components and a liquid‑liquid cooled set of electronics that are consistent with the size, cost and cooling strategies employed on vehicles today. Although we believe the hybrid electric bus and truck market has the potential to be a beneficial option for the bus and truck manufacturers, we temporarily suspended our development efforts with respect to C30 microturbines targeted at this market in response to our lower revenue. Management intends to continue with the next phase of development after we achieve profitability.

We are working with the Kenworth Truck Company to demonstrate a Class 7 series hybrid delivery truck with funding support from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. ThisThe Kenworth Class 7 hybrid truck will be operatedis retrofitted with a refrigerated box body, and a 65kW Capstone microturbine operating on CNG.  Emissions and fuel economy testing was completed at UC Riverside in 2018, including comparison testing of a similarly equipped traditional diesel truck. Results for the three tested drive cycles indicate the hybrid truck can provide 50 to 68% reduction in tailpipe NOx emissions, 19 to 27% reduction in overall CO2 emissions, and 26 to 32% reduction in operating cost.  The next step is to operate the truck on actual customer delivery routes in both air districts to quantify the performance, emissions, fuel economy, and other benefits of a microturbine‑microturbine based hybrid solution. The Kenworth Class 7 hybrid truck is retrofitted with a refrigerated box body and should be ready for track testing at Kenworth facilities in the second half of 2017. The truck will then be used in a demonstration phase to a large commercial customer within the San Joaquin Valley in California. We expect to collect and utilize information from the Kenworth Class 7 hybrid truck’s road testing and demonstration processes for future product developments and enhancements. A prototype or concept vehicle such as this may take several years to go into commercial production following completion of rigorous testing.

Our liquid fuel microturbines have demonstrated emissions levels which meet the CARB 2010 standards for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines (“HDDE”). The liquid fuel microturbine is able to meet these extremely low emissions requirements using its lean premix combustion technology with no exhaust aftertreatment. Competitive reciprocating engine technologies require aftertreatment components that increase system cost, require frequent maintenance, and impact engine efficiency. Our compressed natural gas (“CNG”) fueled microturbines also meet extremely low emission standards, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and CARB 2010 emissions requirements for On‑On Road HDDE for Urban Bus. Test emissions from our natural gas microturbines measured dramatically less than the emissions levels set forth by the CARB standard including NOx at 75% and CO at 96% less than the required levels.

Our marine products may behave been used to provide hybrid electric marine propulsion, “hotel power,” CHP, or CCHP. They may be ideal for small and mid-size commercial ships that travel inland waterways and emissions controlled areas (“ECAs”). Although we believe the marine sector has the potential to be a beneficial option for the vessel owners, we temporarily suspended our development efforts with respect to C30 microturbines targeted at this market in response to our lower revenue. We currently intend to continue with the next phase of development after we achieve profitability. In partnership with one of our long-term EMEA distributors, Capstone has developed a marine C65 for a private yacht manufacturer and in Fiscal 2020 we delivered the product and also received certification from Lloyd’s Register EMEA for Lloyd’s Register Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Special Service Craft 2018 - Part 6.

17

Table of Contents

Our C65 Hybrid UPS product line has been evolving over the years. After having received the 2011 NOVA Award from the Construction Innovation Forum for the C65 Hybrid UPS Microturbine at Syracuse University’s data center—labeled one of the greenest data centers in the world, our C65 Hybrid UPS system has continued development and has recent installations at Sempra in Monterey Park, California and our own data center in Chatsworth, California.Van Nuys, California as well as two Department of Homeland Security installations, among several others. The product utilizes our inverter electronics and controls technology to provide continuous power quality to meet the customer’s critical load. The load inverter is connected through a central power bus to provide power from one of three available power sources including the utility grid, battery storage system, or microturbine generator. Power to the critical load is synchronized to an available utility grid to allow direct bypass of the critical load to the utility grid. This redundant functionality is provided in a single integrated package that can be scaled to a larger seamless power unit through our multipack feature. These units can also be combined with a heat recovery module or an absorption chiller to provide higher total output efficiency. Unlike current UPS products combined with reciprocating engines for backup, our

13


Table of Contents

low emissions Hybrid UPS product allows for continuous operation year-round allowing customers the ability to receive a payback on their capital equipment investment. Although we believe the industrial UPS market has the potential to be a beneficial option for businesses that require constant supply of reliable energy, we temporarily suspended our development efforts with respect to C65 microturbines targeted at this market in response to our lower revenue. We currently intend to continue with the next phase of development after we achieve profitability.

We are working with the DOE on two next generation technology roadmap programs, including a High Efficiency Microturbine with integrated heat recovery and advanced Alumina Forming Austenitic (“AFA”) stainless steel material program in partnership with Oak Ridge National Laboratory (“ORNL”). The High Efficiency Microturbine with integrated heat recovery is focused on improving microturbine electrical efficiency and overall system efficiency utilizing heat recovery. In March 2013, we successfully completed proof‑of‑concept testing of the low pressure spool also known as the C250 that produced >270 kW as part of the first phase of development. This allowed us to proceed with high pressure spool development which was completed during Fiscal 2016. We also demonstrated an increased capability of the power electronics and electrical system required to support this higher power generator. We intend to continue with the next phase of development and commercialization after we achieve profitability. The next phase will be to continue development of the C250 product architecture as well as the associated power electronics and software controls required for successful commercialization. The final phase of the program will incorporate further engine efficiency improvements, resulting in a product design with a projected electrical efficiency of 42% and targeted power output of 370 kW. Improvements in efficiency are key to all markets as improved fuel efficiency benefits end users through lower operating costs. AFA stainless steel is a material that offers superior oxidation and creep resistance to commercial heat‑resistant steel alloys used in our microturbines at a significantly reduced cost. In Fiscal 2015, we successfully completed the first of two long term endurance tests and have engaged industry partners on commercialization viability.

Protecting our Intellectual Property Rights and Patents

We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright, “know how”, and trademark laws and nondisclosure agreements to establish and protect our intellectual property rights in our products. In this regard, we have obtained 9847 U.S. and 273 international patents (in certain cases covering the same technology in multiple jurisdictions). The patents we have obtained will expire between 2017calendar years 2020 and 2035.2037. We actively evaluate our patent portfolio and pursue new patent applications as we develop new technological innovations, as needed.

We believe that a policy of protecting intellectual property is one component of our strategy of being the leader in microturbine system technology and will provide us with a long term competitive advantage. In addition, we implement security procedures at our plants and facilities and have confidentiality agreements with our suppliers, distributors, employees and certain visitors to our facilities.

Organization and Employees

We were organized in 1988 in the State of California, ourCalifornia. Our company was reincorporated as Capstone Turbine Corporation on June 22, 2000 in the State of Delaware.

As of March 31, 2017,2020, we had 168100 full-time employees and 12 part time employees. No employees are covered by collective bargaining arrangements. We consider relations with our employees to be moderate to good after the Fiscal 2017 reductions in force.good.

Available Information

This Form 10‑K, as well as our quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8‑K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) are made available free of charge on our Internet website (http://www.capstoneturbine.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

14


Table of Contents

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.Factors

This document contains certain forward‑looking statements (as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Exchange Act) pertaining to, among other things,

·

the COVID-19 pandemic

18

Table of Contents

·

our results of operations;

·

profits and losses;

·

our ability to raise additional capital;

·

R&D activities;

·

sales expectations;

·

our ability to develop markets for our products;

·

sources for parts;

·

federal, state and local government regulations;

·

our relationship with our distributors;

·

industry and economic conditions applicable to us;

·

the efficiency, reliability and environmental advantages of our products and their need for maintenance;

·

our ability to be cost‑competitive and to outperform competition;

·

customer satisfaction;

·

the value of using our products;

·

our ability to achieve economies of scale;

·

market advantage;

·

return on investments;

·

issues with suppliers;

·

anticipation of product supply requirements;

·

listing requirements;

·

our microturbine technology;

·

the utilization of our products;

·

competition;

·

the introduction of new technologies;

15


Table of Contents

·

our production capacity;

·

international markets;

·

protection of intellectual property;

19

Table of Contents

·

cybersecurity threats;

·

the adequacy of our facilities;

·

dividends;

·

business strategy;

·

product development;

·

capital resources;

·

capital expenditures;

·

liquidity;

·

amortization expense of intangibles;

·

cost of warranties;

·

stock‑based compensation;

·

our NOL rights plan;

·

purchase and lease commitments;

·

current liabilities;

·

recently issued accounting standards;

·

market risk;

·

international sanctions risk;

·

the strength of the U.S. dollar;

·

interest rate sensitivity;

·

the effect of cost reductions on future business initiatives;

·

the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; and

·

growth of the shale gas market.

These statements are based largely on our current expectations, estimates and forecasts and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward‑looking statements. Factors that can cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those discussed below. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward‑looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The following factors should be considered in addition to the other information contained herein in evaluating us and our business. We assume no obligation to update any of the forward‑looking statements after the filing of this Form 10-K to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as may be required by law.

The following are risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward‑looking statements contained in this Form 10-K because these factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those

20

Table of Contents

projected in forward‑looking statements. Before you invest in our publicly traded securities, you should know that making such an investment involves some risks, including the risks described below. Additional risks of which we may

16


Table of Contents

not be aware or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations or our stock price. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow could be negatively affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In assessing these risks, investors should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q and other documents filed by us from time to time.

The ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

An infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) that was first detected in November 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China, known as COVID-19, resulted in an outbreak throughout the world. The subsequent spread of COVID-19 to the U.S. and many other parts of the world led the World Health Organization to characterize COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Thereafter, most U.S. states imposed “stay-at-home” orders on their populations to stem the spread of COVID-19. Of specific interest to the Company, stay-at-home orders were imposed in the state of California on March 20, 2020. Governments, public institutions, and other organizations in countries and localities throughout the world have taken and are continuing to take certain emergency measures to combat the spread of COVID-19, including implementation of restrictions on travel and orders that restrict the operations of institutions such as schools and businesses. We have already furloughed 47 employees in the U.S. and the remaining 100 employees continue to support essential business operations. These conditions will negatively impact all aspects of our business. Our business is also dependent on the continued health and productivity of our employees, including our manufacturing employees, sales staff and corporate management teams. While the full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and government response is not yet known, we have experienced initial impacts of this pandemic in the three months ended March 31, 2020 and it could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition in the future.

In addition, due to domestic and international governmental orders restricting certain activities in response to COVID-19, including in Van Nuys, California, where our corporate headquarters and many of our operations, including our principal manufacturing facility, are located, we have experienced, and may in the future experience, certain disruptions in our business, including changes to our on-site operations to reduce manufacturing capacity and implement social distancing, reductions in our suppliers’ ability to source, maintain inventory and ship raw materials in alignment with our demands, work stoppages, slowdowns and delays, including having most of our employees working outside of our offices, travel restrictions, reduced access to our customers for product training and case support, and cancellation of events, delays in product development efforts, and other negative impacts on our capacity to manufacture, our suppliers’ capacity to source and ship raw materials and our distributors’ ability to sell and support the use of our products.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also caused significant uncertainty and volatility in global financial markets. Due to such volatility, we may not be able to raise additional capital, if needed, on favorable terms, or at all. Further adverse economic events resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, including a recession, depression or other sustained economic downturn, could materially and adversely affect our business, access to capital markets and the value of our common stock.

As of April 24, 2020, we entered into a loan with Western Alliance Bank in an aggregate principal amount of $2,610,200 pursuant to PPP under the CARES Act. Forgiveness of this loan is only available for principal that is used for the limited purposes that qualify for forgiveness. While we intend to pursue the forgiveness of the PPP loan received in accordance with the requirements and limitations under the CARES Act, no assurance can be provided that forgiveness of any portion of the PPP loan will be obtained.

Additionally, our liquidity could be negatively impacted if these conditions continue for a significant period of time and we may be required to pursue additional sources of financing to obtain working capital, maintain appropriate inventory levels, and meet our financial obligations. Currently, capital and credit markets have been disrupted by the crisis and our ability to obtain any required financing is not guaranteed and largely dependent upon evolving market

21

Table of Contents

conditions and other factors. Depending on the continued impact of the crisis, further actions may be required to improve our cash position and capital structure.

The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of potential impacts on our business, healthcare systems, the medical device industry or the global economy as a whole. However, these effects could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Our operating history is characterized by net losses. We anticipate further losses and we may never become profitable.

Since inception, we have incurred annual operating losses. We expect this trend to continue until such time that we can sell a sufficient number of units and achieve a cost structure to become profitable. Our business is such that we have relatively few repeat end use customers and limited repeat business compared to our competitors. As a result, we may not maintain or increase revenue. We may not have adequate cash resources to reach the point of profitability, and we may never become profitable. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may be unable to increase our sales and sustain or increase our profitability in the future.

Future issuances or sales of our common stock or exercises by holders of our outstanding warrants could lower our stock price and dilute the interests of existing stockholders.

We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future. The issuance of a substantial amount of common stock could have the effect of substantially diluting the interests of our current stockholders. In addition, the sale of a substantial amount of common stock in the public market, either in the initial issuance or in a subsequent resale by investors who acquired such common stock in a private placement, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future public sales of our common stock or the availability of additional shares of our common stock for sale will have on the market and trading price of our common stock. In addition, we currently have warrants outstanding for the purchase of up to an aggregate of 1.5 million shares of our common stock and certain of our warrant holders also have the right to require us to register under the Securities Act the shares issuable upon exercise of their warrants. In addition, some of our outstanding warrants contain anti-dilution provisions that may, under certain circumstances, increase the number of shares issuable thereunder. To the extent the warrants outstanding are fully exercised, a significant number of shares of common stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of our shares of common stock and an increase in the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. If any of our existing stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or if the public perceives that such sales could occur, this could have an adverse impact on the market and trading price of our securities, even if there is no relationship between such sales and the performance of our business.

We may be unable to fund our future operating requirements, which could force us to curtail our operations.

To the extent that the funds we now have on hand are insufficient to fund our future operating requirements, we would need to raise additional funds, through further public or private equity or debt financings depending upon prevailing market conditions. These financings may not be available or, if available, may be on terms that are not favorable to us and could result in dilution to our stockholders and reduction of the trading price of our stock. The state of capital markets when we seek to raise additional capital could also impede our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms or at all. If adequate capital were not available to us, we likely would be required to significantly curtail our operations or possibly even cease our operations.

On June 2, 2017,February 4, 2019, we entered into twoa Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), by and among us, certain subsidiaries of us party thereto as guarantors, Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc. and any other purchasers party thereto from time to time (collectively, the “Purchaser”) and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc., as collateral agent, in connection with the sale of senior secured credit facilitiesnotes by us in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. Under the Note Purchase Agreement, we sold to the Purchaser $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (the “Bridge Bank Credit Agreements”“Notes”) with Western Alliance Bank through its Bridge Bank division (“Bridge Bank”), with credit support provided byand the Export-Import Bankentire principal amount of the United States through its working capital guarantee program.  Under the terms of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, we may borrow up to $12.0 millionNotes is due and payable on a revolving basis depending on, among other factors, the amount of our eligible inventory and accounts receivable.February 4, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”). The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements are for a two-year period ending June 2, 2019.

Total borrowings, letter of credit obligationsNotes do not amortize and the then aggregate committed amountentire principal balance is due in a single payment on the Maturity Date.

22

Table of cash management services under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements may not exceed 85% of the sum of unrestricted cash and the amount of cash collateral held at Bridge Bank. Contents

As a condition of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements,Note Purchase Agreement, we have restricted $5.0shall not permit consolidated liquidity on any date to be less than $12.0 million of cash equivalents as additional security for the credit facility.until February 4, 2020 and thereafter, $9.0 million. Borrowings under the Bridge Bank Credit AgreementsNote Purchase Agreement will bear interest at a rate of 13.0% per annum, interest atcomputed on the prime rate plus 1.5 percent,basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months, and payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year until maturity, subject to increase during the occurrence of an event of default. Obligations under the Bridge Bank Credit AgreementsNote Purchase Agreement are secured by all of our assets, including intellectual property and general intangibles.

The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements include affirmativeNote Purchase Agreement contains customary covenants, as well as negativeincluding, among others, covenants that prohibit a variety of actions without Bridge Bank’s consent, including covenants that limitrestrict our ability to (a) incur or guarantee debt, (b) creategrant liens, (c)make certain investments and acquisitions, pay dividends, repurchase equity interests, repay certain debt, amend certain contracts, enter into any merger, recapitalizationaffiliate transactions and asset sales or similar transaction or purchase all or substantially allmake certain equity issuances (including equity issuances that would cause an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the assets or stock of another entity, or (d) sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose ofInternal Revenue Code), and covenants that require us to, among other things, provide annual, quarterly and monthly financial statements, together with related compliance certificates, maintain our assets.property in good repair, maintain insurance and comply with applicable laws. 

The financial covenants  of the domestic credit agreement with Bridge Bank (the “Domestic Facility”) requires us not to exceed specified levels of losses relative to our financial model and the outstanding line of credit advances may not exceed 85% of  the sum of unrestricted cash and the amount of cash collateral held at Bridge Bank. The Domestic FacilityNote Purchase Agreement also defines an event of default to include a material adverse effect on our business.as, among other things, payment default, bankruptcy events, cross defaults, breaches of covenants and representations and warranties, changes of control, judgment defaults and an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. An event of default, for this or any other reason, if not waived, could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our obligations under the credit facilityNote Purchase Agreement could have important consequences, including the following:

·

We may have difficulty obtaining additional financing at favorable interest rates to meet our requirements for operations, capital expenditures, general corporate or other purposes.

17


Table of Contents

·

We will be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness,the Notes, which will reduce the amount of funds available for operations, capital expenditures and future acquisitions.

·

WeGoldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc., as collateral agent under the Note Purchase Agreement, may enforce any and all liens and security interests on the collateral we have used to secure the Notes and we may forfeit our right to such collateral.

·

In order to avoid breaches of the Note Purchase Agreement covenant relating to Section 382 changes of ownership, we may be required to repay our indebtedness immediately if we default on any of the numerous financial or other restrictive covenants containedlimited in the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements. It is not certain whetheramount of additional equity securities we will have, or will beare able to obtain, sufficient fundssell to make these accelerated payments. If any outstanding indebtedness under the credit facilityraise capital. Accordingly, our desire to preserve our federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive funding opportunities.

We may be required to repay the Notes immediately if we default on any of the numerous financial or other restrictive covenants contained in the Note Purchase Agreement. It is not certain whether we will have, or will be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make any such accelerated payments. If any outstanding indebtedness under the Notes is accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay such indebtedness.

If we are unable to either substantially improve our operating results or obtain additional financing, we may be unable to continue to operate at current levels.

We have experienced recurring operating losses and as of March 31, 2017,2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $850.9$900.9 million. On March 31, 2017,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $19.7$15.1 million, and working capital of $14.2$29.8 million. This compares to $827.0$878.9 million, $16.7$29.7 million and $18.1$42.0 million, respectively, on March 31, 2016.2019. As a condition of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, we have restricted $5.0Note Purchase Agreement with the Purchaser, our consolidated liquidity on any date may not be less than $12.0 million through the first anniversary date of cash equivalents as additional security for the credit facilityFebruary 4, 2020, and not available to us.$9.0 million thereafter.

Our business strategy is focused on profitability-oriented initiatives such as reducing operating expenses, diversifying and increasing revenue, and improving gross margin and utilizing our joint venture, Capstone Energy Finance to provide financing options for the purchase of Capstone microturbines.margin. We may not be able to execute the business strategy successfully and if we are unable to generate positive cash flow, potential customers may choose not to purchase our products.

23

Table of Contents

products or utilize our program. Moreover, the business strategy is based upon projections, which are in turn based upon estimates and assumptions. There can be no assurance as to the accuracy of the projections, estimates and assumptions which underlie the business strategy or as to our ability to execute the business strategy successfully.

Should we be unable to execute our plans to increase sales and margins while controlling costs, we may be unable to continue to operate at our current levels on a longer-term basis. In particular, we must generate positive cash flow from operations and net income and otherwise improve our results of operations substantially on a longer-term basis. Our available cash and proceeds from future financings, if any, that we may be able to obtain, may not be sufficient to fund our operating expenses, capital expenditures and other cash requirements. Any such lack of funds would affect our ability to continue to operate at current levels. These events and circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional capital and on the market value of our common stock and our ability to maintain our credit facility. Moreover, should we experience a cash shortage that requires us to curtail or cease our operations, or should we be unable to continue to operate at current levels, you could lose all or part of your investments in our securities.

SEC regulations limit the amount of funds we can raise during any 12-month period pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3.

SEC regulations limit the amount that companies with a public float of less than $75 million may raise during any 12-month period pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, or the Baby Shelf Rule. We are currently limited by the Baby Shelf Rule and are not able to use the remaining availability under our shelf registration statement to raise more than one-third of our public float. Furthermore, if we are required to file a new registration statement on another form, we may incur additional costs and be subject to delays due to review by the SEC staff.

Impairment charges on our long‑lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives would adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.

We evaluate the carrying value of long‑lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. To determine whether impairment has occurred, we compare the undiscounted cash flows of the long‑lived asset group with its carrying value. The estimation of future cash flows requires significant estimates of factors that include future sales growth, gross margin performance, including our estimates of reductions in our direct material costs, and reductions in operating expenses. If our sales growth, gross margin performance or other estimated operating results are not achieved at or above our forecasted level, or inflation exceeds our forecast, the carrying value of our asset group may prove to be unrecoverable and we may incur impairment charges in the future. In addition, significant and unanticipated changes in circumstances, such as significant adverse changes in business climate, unanticipated competition, loss of key customers or changes in technology or markets, could require a charge for impairment that can materially and adversely affect our reported net loss and our stockholders’ equity.

18


Table of Contents

A sustainable market for microturbines may never develop or may take longer to develop than we anticipate which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Our products represent an emerging market, and we do not know whether our targeted customers will accept our technology or will purchase our products in sufficient quantities to allow our business to grow. To succeed, demand for our products must increase significantly in existing markets, and there must be strong demand for products that we introduce in the future. In addition, as part of our business strategy, we are focusing our marketing efforts on the oil and gas,energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural resources, critical power, microgrid and combined heat and powertransportation markets. We may be unable to grow our business in these target markets. If a sustainable market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we anticipate, we may be unable to recover the losses we have incurred to develop our products, we may have further impairment of assets, and we may be unable to meet our operational expenses. The development of a sustainable market for our systems may be hindered by many factors, including some that are out of our control. Examples include:

·

consumer reluctance to try a new product;

24

Table of Contents

·

regulatory requirements;

·

the cost competitiveness of our microturbines;

·

costs associated with the installation and commissioning of our microturbines;

·

maintenance and repair costs associated with our microturbines;

·

the future costs and availability of fuels used by our microturbines;

·

economic downturns and reduction in capital spending;

·

consumer perceptions of our microturbines’ safety and quality;

·

the emergence of newer, more competitive technologies and products;

·

growth of the HEV market; and

·

decrease in domestic and international incentives.

We depend upon the development of new products and enhancements of existing products.

Our operating results depend on our ability to develop and introduce new products, enhance existing products and reduce the costs to produce our products. The success of our products is dependent on several factors, including proper product definition, product cost, timely completion and introduction of the products, differentiation of products from those of our competitors, meeting changing customer requirements, emerging industry standards and market acceptance of these products. The development of new, technologically advanced products and enhancements is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify new product opportunities, develop and bring new or enhanced products to market in a timely manner, successfully lower costs and achieve market acceptance of our products, or that products and technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or uncompetitive.

19


Table of Contents

Our operating results are dependent, in large part, upon the successful commercialization of our products. Failure to produce our products as scheduled and budgeted would materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We cannot be certain that we will deliver ordered products in a timely manner. We have limited production slots for our products. Any delays in production will increase our costs, reduce future production slots and could significantly impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may not be able to produce our products on a timely basis if we fail to correctly anticipate product supply requirements or if we suffer delays in production resulting from issues with our suppliers. Our suppliers may not supply us with a sufficient amount of components or components of adequate quality, or they may provide components at significantly increased prices.

Some of our components are currently available only from a single source or limited sources. We may experience delays in production if we fail to identify alternative suppliers, or if any parts supply is interrupted, each of which could materially adversely affect our business and operations. In order to reduce manufacturing lead times and ensure adequate component supply, we enter into agreements with certain suppliers that allow them to procure inventories based upon criteria defined by us. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, an oversupply of parts could result in excess or obsolete inventories, which could adversely affect our business. Additionally, if we fail to correctly anticipate our internal supply requirements, an undersupply of parts could limit our production capacity. Our inability to meet volume commitments with suppliers could affect the availability or pricing of our parts and components. A reduction or interruption in supply, a significant increase in price of one or more components or a

25

Table of Contents

decrease in demand of products could materially adversely affect our business and operations and could materially damage our customer relationships. Financial problems of suppliers on whom we rely could limit our supply of components or increase our costs. Also, we cannot guarantee that any of the parts or components that we purchase will be of adequate quality or that the prices we pay for the parts or components will not increase. Inadequate quality of products from suppliers could interrupt our ability to supply quality products to our customers in a timely manner. Additionally, defects in materials or products supplied by our suppliers that are not identified before our products are placed in service by our customers could result in higher warranty costs and damage to our reputation. We also outsource certain of our components internationally. As a result of outsourcing internationally, we may be subject to delays in delivery because of regulations associated with the import/export process, delays in transportation or regional instability.

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we identified a defect in one of the component parts for microturbine systems from one of our single source suppliers. As a result of this defect we have identified several new suppliers with greater engineering expertise and robust quality management systems. The transition is complex, lengthy and may result in an interruption in our manufacturing process. An interruption in our manufacturing process for this component part would adversely impact our results of operations. The efforts to qualify and dual source these components was completed in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019.

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2018, we received notification from one of our single source suppliers that they were at maximum capacity and would require prepayment and a significant increase in the price of multiple components in order to fulfill our supply requirements for Fiscal 2019. Capacity issues at a supplier could cause an interruption in parts and could result in component price increases. This could impact margins or sales in future quarters. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we issued a prepayment of approximately $2.2 million to this single source supplier. A new supplier has been fully qualified and has taken over as the primary source of this commodity for Capstone.

Commodity market factors impact our costs and availability of materials.

Our products contain a number of commodity materials from metals, which include steel, special high temperature alloys, copper, nickel and molybdenum, to computer components. The availability of these commodities could impact our ability to acquire the materials necessary to meet our production requirements. The cost of metals has historically fluctuated. The pricing could impact the costs to manufacture our products. If we are not able to acquire commodity materials at prices and on terms satisfactory to us or at all, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.

Adverse economic conditions may have an impact on our business and financial condition, including some effects we may not be able to predict.

Adverse economic conditions may prevent our customers from purchasing our products or delay their purchases, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our ability to access the capital markets may be severely restricted or made very expensive at a time when we need, or would like, to do so, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial resources. Certain industries in which our customers do business and certain geographic areas have been and could continue to be adversely affected by adverse economic conditions. Our revenue continues to be negatively impacted by the volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar (making our products more expensive overseas) and ongoing global geopolitical tensions in Russia, North Africa and the Middle East.

20


Table of Contents

tensions.

Product quality expectations may not be met, causing slower market acceptance or warranty cost exposure.

In order to achieve our goal of improving the quality and lowering the total costs of ownership of our products, we may require engineering changes. Such improvement initiatives may render existing inventories obsolete or excessive. Despite our continuous quality improvement initiatives, we may not meet customer expectations. Any significant quality issues with our products could have a material adverse effect on our rate of product adoption, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. Moreover, as we develop new configurations for our microturbines and as our customers place existing configurations in commercial use, our products may perform below expectations. Any

26

Table of Contents

significant performance below expectations could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and cash flow and affect the marketability of our products.

We sell our products with warranties. There can be no assurance that the provision for estimated product warranty will be sufficient to cover our warranty expenses in the future. We cannot ensure that our efforts to reduce our risk through warranty disclaimers will effectively limit our liability. Any significant incurrence of warranty expense in excess of estimates could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and cash flow. Further, we have at times undertaken programs to enhance the performance of units previously sold. For example, during Fiscal 2017, we recorded a one-time non-cash warranty provision of approximately $5.2 million to proactively retrofit select non-Signature Series C200 microturbines with the more robust new Signature Series generator components to improve product performance and reliability. Additionally, our warranty provision was negatively impacted in Fiscal 2019 because of a supplier defect that was identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019.

These enhancements have at times been provided at no cost or below our cost. If we choose to offer such programs again in the future, such actions could result in significant costs.

We operate in a highly competitive market among competitors who have significantly greater resources than we have and we may not be able to compete effectively.

We compete with several technologies, including reciprocating engines, fuel cells and solar power. Competing technologies may receive certain benefits, like governmental subsidies or promotion, or be able to offer consumer rebates or other incentives that we cannot receive or offer to the same extent. This could enhance our competitors’ abilities to fund research, penetrate markets or increase sales. We also compete with other manufacturers of microturbines.

Our competitors include several well‑known companies with histories of providing power solutions. They have substantially greater resources than we do and have established worldwide presence. Because of greater resources, some of our competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products than we can or lobby for governmental regulations and policies to create competitive advantages vis‑à‑vis our products. We believe that developing and maintaining a competitive advantage will require continued investment by us in product development and quality, as well as attention to product performance, our product prices, our conformance to industry standards, manufacturing capability and sales and marketing. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may in the future establish collaborative relationships among themselves or with third parties, including third parties with whom we have business relationships. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share.

Overall, the market for our products is highly competitive and is changing rapidly. We believe that the primary competitive factors affecting the market for our products, including some that are outside of our control, include:

·

name recognition, historical performance and market power of our competitors;

·

product quality and performance;

·

operating efficiency;

·

product price;

21


Table of Contents

·

availability, price and compatibility of fuel;

·

development of new products and features; and

·

emissions levels.

27

Table of Contents

There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete against either current or potential competitors or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flow. 

Our products involve a lengthy sales cycle, and we may not anticipate sales levels appropriately, which could impair our results of operations.

The sale of our products typically involves a significant commitment of capital by customers, which can result in the typical delays associated with large capital expenditures. For these and other reasons, the sales cycle associated with our products is typically lengthy and subject to a number of significant risks over which we have little or no control. We plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand, which is highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. If sales in any period fall significantly below anticipated levels, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow would suffer. If demand in any period increases well above anticipated levels, we may have difficulties in responding, incur greater costs to respond, or be unable to fulfill the demand in sufficient time to retain the order, which would negatively impact our operations. In addition, our operating expenses are based on anticipated sales levels, and a high percentage of our expenses are generally fixed in the short term. As a result of these factors, a small fluctuation in timing of sales can cause operating results to vary materially from period to period.

Net product orders for Fiscal 20172020 were $43.8$33.8 million and contributed to an ending backlog of $113.0$37.7 million at March 31, 2017.2020. The book-to-bill ratio was 1.1:1.4:1 for Fiscal 2017.2020. Book-to-bill ratio is the ratio of new orders we received to units shipped and billed during a period. However, because our backlog represents only the estimated amount of future product revenue to be recognized under negotiated contracts as shipments convert backlog to recognized revenue for accounting purposes, we may not be able to fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog, and our backlog may not be indicative of future revenues. A portion of our backlog is concentrated in the international oil and gas market which may impact the overall timing of shipments or the conversion of backlog to revenue. The timing of the backlog is based on the requirement date indicated by our customers. Based on historical experience, management expects that a significant portion of our backlog may not be shipped within the next 18 months. The timing of shipments is subject to change based on several variables (including customer deposits, payments, availability of credit and customer delivery schedule changes), most of which are not in our control and can affect the timing of our revenue. As a result, management believes the book-to-bill ratio demonstrates the current demand for our products in the given period.

DuringOn October 13, 2017, we entered into the second quarterAssignment Agreement and the Notes with TI. 

Pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, we agreed to assign to TI the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC Engineering, our fiscal yearformer Russian distributor (“BPC”), upon TI’s payment to us of $2.5 million in three payments by February 1, 2018. We received payments from TI of approximately $1.0 million under the Assignment Agreement during Fiscal 2018 which was recorded as bad debt recovery.

In connection with the terms of the Note, we granted TI the sole distribution rights for our products and services in the Russian oil and gas sector. As a result of this appointment, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 35 equal monthly installments starting in August 2018.

On October 13, 2017, we and Hispania Petroleum, S.A. (the “Guarantor”), entered into a Guaranty Agreement (the “Guaranty Agreement”) whereby the Guarantor guarantees TI’s obligations under the Agreement and Note. However, due to our limited business relationship with TI and the missed payments on the Assignment Agreement, we deferred recognition of the Assignment Agreement and Note until collectability is reasonably assured.   

On June 5, 2018, we entered into the Amended Assignment Agreement and the Amended Note with TI. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Assignment Agreement, the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC was contingent upon TI’s payment to us of the remaining approximately $1.5 million in five payments by September 20, 2019. The payments of $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million due March 20, 2019, June 20, 2019, and September 20, 2019, respectively, under the Amended Assignment Agreement, have not been received at the time of this filing. Under the terms of the Amended Note, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 13 equal quarterly installments starting on December 20, 2019. In September 2019, we sent TI a notice to cure default with a deadline of October 31, 2019. TI failed to cure the noticed default and we have since terminated TI’s distributor

28

Table of Contents

agreement. As a result, the BPC accounts receivable and related accounts receivable reserve of $4.8 million were written off.

As a result of the above amendments, during the three months ended March 31, 2016,2018 we removed product orders related to BPC from backlog for approximately $7.2 million. This removal was the result of product pricing that we no longer would honor. Additionally, for Fiscal 2019, we removed product orders related to BPC from backlog for approximately $20.7 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2019 we removed approximately $51.6 million, for 186 units, representing 63.8 megawatts, of backlog from BPC Engineering, one$4.6 million. These removals were the result of our Russian distributors. This removal alignedcontinuous review of BPC related backlog with TI which resulted in us no longer honoring the product pricing. Due to the cancellation of our distributor agreement with TI, we removed product orders related to BPC from backlog for approximately $15.8 million during the three months ended December 31, 2019. There are no remaining backlog related to our management’s expectations based on the global macroeconomic environment during our fiscal year endedBPC as of March 31, 2015, such as the volatility of the global oil and gas market, a strong U.S. dollar (making our products more expensive overseas) and on-going geopolitical tensions involving Russia. In addition, we removed a portion of our TA100 backlog of approximately $2.4 million, for 17 units representing 1.7 megawatts, from Calnetix Power Solutions, Inc. during the first quarter of our fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. This removal aligned our TA100 backlog with our management’s decision to limit future production of TA100 systems.2020.

If we do not effectively implement our sales, marketing and service plans, our sales will not grow and our results of operations will suffer.

Our sales and marketing efforts may not achieve intended results and, therefore, may not generate the revenue we anticipate. As a result of our corporate strategies, we have decided to focus our resources on selected vertical markets. We may change our focus to other markets or applications in the future. There can be no assurance that our focus or our near term plans will be successful. If we are not able to address markets for our products successfully, we may not be able to grow our business, compete effectively or achieve profitability.

22


Table of Contents

Our business and financial performance depends in part on the oil and natural gas industry, and a decline in prices for oil and natural gas may have an adverse effect on our revenue, cash flows, profitability and growth.

The significant decline in oil and natural gas prices beginning in late 2014 caused a reduction in our customers' spending and associated drilling and completion activities, which had an adverse effect on our revenue.revenue for multiple years. We experienced an improvement in revenue during Fiscal 2019 due to favorable oil prices, however revenue has decreased in Fiscal 2020 due to declining oil prices.  We continue to be impacted by the volatility of the global oil and gas industry. If prices were to remain low or decline further, we would expect to see similar declines in our customers' spending which would have an adverse effect on our revenue. In addition, a worsening of these conditions may result in a material adverse impact on certain of our customers' liquidity and financial position resulting in further spending reductions, delays in the collection of amounts owing to us and similar impactsimpacts.

Our sales and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted by risks inherent in international markets.

As we expand in international markets, customers may have difficulty or be unable to integrate our products into their existing systems or may have difficulty complying with foreign regulatory and commercial requirements. As a result, our products may require redesign. Any redesign of the product may delay sales or cause quality issues. In addition, we may be subject to a variety of other risks associated with international business, including import/export restrictions, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and economic or political instability. Our business in particular is also subject to risks relating to uncertainties and effects of the implementation of the United Kingdom’s referendum to withdraw membership from the EU (referred to as “Brexit”), including financial, legal, tax and trade implications. In addition, doing business internationally subjects us to risks relating to political or social unrest, as well as corruption and government regulation, including U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, that impose stringent requirements on how we conduct our foreign operations. If any of these events occur, our businesses may be adversely affected.

Changes to trade regulation, quotas, duties or tariffs, and sanctions caused by the changing U.S. and geopolitical environments or otherwise, may increase our costs or limit the amount of raw materials and products that we can import, or may otherwise adversely impact our business.

The current geopolitical instabilityU.S. administration has voiced strong concerns about imports from countries that it perceives as engaging in Russiaunfair trade practices, and Ukrainemay decide to impose import duties or other restrictions on products, components or raw materials sourced from those countries, which may include China, Mexico, and other countries from which we

29

Table of Contents

import components or raw materials. Any such duties or restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Moreover, these new tariffs, or other changes in U.S. trade policy, could trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries. Certain foreign governments have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on certain U.S. goods. Others are considering the imposition of sanctions that will deny U.S. companies access to critical raw materials. A “trade war” of this nature or other governmental action related sanctions byto tariffs or international trade agreements or policies has the potential to adversely impact demand for our products, our costs, customers, suppliers and/or the U.S. government againsteconomy or certain companiessectors thereof and, individuals may hinder our abilitythus, to conduct business with potential or existing customers and vendors in these countries.

We derived approximately 11% and 2% of our revenue from Russia during Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, respectively. The continuation or escalation of the current geopolitical instability in Russia and Ukraine could negativelyadversely impact our operations, sales, and future growth prospects in that region. businesses.

The U.S. government imposedimposes sanctions through several executive orders restricting U.S. companies from conducting certain oil and gas production related business activities with specified Russian and Ukrainian individuals and companies, such as in Russia and requiringthe Ukraine, and requires export licenses for certain of such activities. While we believe that the executive orders currently do not preclude us from conductinghave a material impact on our business, with our current customers in Russia, the sanctions imposed by the U.S. government could be expanded in the future to restrict us from engaging with them.future. If we are unable to conduct business with new or existing customers or pursue opportunities in Russia or Ukraine or elsewhere,with sanctioned countries, our business, including revenue, profitability and cash flows, could be materially adversely affected. If we are unable to conduct business with certain vendors, our operations in Russia and Ukraine could be materially adversely affected.

Our business may be impacted by international instability,, war, terrorism, and geopolitical events.

International political and economic instability or volatility, geopolitical regional conflicts, terrorist activity, political unrest, civil strife, acts of war, public corruption, expropriation and other economic or political uncertainties could interrupt and negatively affect the performance of our services, sale of our products or other business operations. A slowdown in economic growth in some emerging markets could result in long sales cycles, greater risk of uncollectible accounts and longer collection cycles. Fluctuations or devaluations in currency values, especially in emerging markets, could have an adverse effect on us, our suppliers, logistics providers and manufacturing vendors. All of these factors could result in increased costs or decreased revenues, and could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to retain or develop relationships with OEMs or distributors in our targeted markets, in which case our sales would not increase as expected.

In order to serve certain of our targeted markets, we believe that we must ally ourselves with companies that have particular expertise or better access to those markets. We believe that retaining or developing relationships with strong OEMs (which to date have typically resold our products under their own brands or packaged our products with other products as part of an integrated unit) or distributors in these targeted markets can improve the rate of adoption as well as reduce the direct financial burden of introducing a new technology and creating a new market. Because of OEMs’ and distributors’ relationships in their respective markets, the loss of an OEM or distributor could adversely

23


Table of Contents

impact the ability to penetrate our target markets. We offer our OEMs and distributors stated discounts from list price for the products they purchase. In the future, to attract and retain OEMs and distributors we may provide volume price discounts or otherwise incur significant costs that may reduce the potential revenue from these relationships. We may not be able to retain or develop appropriate OEMs and distributors on a timely basis, and we cannot provide assurance that the OEMs and distributors will focus adequate resources on selling our products or will be successful in selling them. In addition, some of the relationships may require that we grant exclusive distribution rights in defined territories. These exclusive distribution arrangements could result in our being unable to enter into other arrangements at a time when the OEM or distributor with whom we form a relationship is not successful in selling our products or has reduced its commitment to market our products. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to negotiate collaborative relationships on favorable terms or at all. Our inability to have appropriate distribution in our target markets may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

30

Table of Contents

If any of our distributor relationships is not successful, we may terminate or choose not to renew the related distributor agreement, which may result in interference with the wind down of the relationship or the transition of end-user service agreements, and could potentially negatively impact our distribution channel or result in litigation costs or other expenses.

Successfully managing our distribution channel in an effort to reach various potential customer segments for our products and services is a complex process. Each of our distributors is a strategically placed independent partner that provides for marketing and selling of our products and services on our behalf. If our distribution relationships are not successful, we may lose sales opportunities, customers, and revenues. Our agreements with our distribution partners require them to comply with performance conditions that are subject to interpretation, which could result in disagreements. At any given time, we may be in disputes with one or more distribution partners. Any such dispute could result in lengthy and costly litigation, even if the outcome is ultimately in our favor. We cannot predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation, the effect of any negative judgment against us or the amount of any settlement that we may enter into with such distribution partners. A contractual dispute with a distribution partner may result in our or our distribution partner seeking to terminate the related distribution agreement, even if such termination would be wrongful, which could harm our business, or interfere with a previously agreed  wind down of the relationship or transition of end-user service agreements. Any prolonged disruptions of our distribution channels that results from the termination of one or more of our distributions or our failure to renew our distribution agreements with our desired distributors, could negatively affect our ability to effectively sell our products and would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have substantial accounts receivable, and increased bad debt expense or delays in collecting accounts receivable could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations.

Our accounts receivable balance, net of allowances, was $17.0 million and $13.6$16.2 million as of March 31, 20172020 and March 31, 2016, respectively.2019. Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”) at the end of Fiscal 20172020 was 6885 days, compared with 6670 days at the end of Fiscal 2016.2019. We recorded net bad debt expense of approximately $0.4 million during Fiscal 2020, and net bad debt recovery of approximately $1.5$0.3 million during each of Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016.2019. No assurances can be given that future bad debt expense will not increase above current operating levels. Increased bad debt expense or delays in collecting accounts receivable could have a material adverse effect on cash flows and results of operations.

We may experience a delay in payment or may not collect on the Accounts Receivable Assignment Agreement or Promissory Note with Turbine International, LLC.

On October 13, 2017, we entered into the Assignment Agreement and the Notes with TI. 

Pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, we agreed to assign to TI the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC Engineering, our former Russian distributor (“BPC”), upon TI’s payment to us of $2.5 million in three payments by February 1, 2018. We received payments from TI of approximately $1.0 million under the Assignment Agreement during Fiscal 2018 which was recorded as bad debt recovery.

On October 13, 2017, we and Hispania Petroleum, S.A. (the “Guarantor”), entered into a Guaranty Agreement (the “Guaranty Agreement”) whereby the Guarantor guarantees TI’s obligations under the Agreement and Note. However, due to our limited business relationship with TI and the missed payments on the Assignment Agreement, we deferred recognition of the Assignment Agreement and Note until collectability is reasonably assured.  

In connection with the terms of the Note, we granted TI the sole distribution rights for our products and services in the Russian oil and gas sector. As a result of this appointment, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 35 equal monthly installments starting in August 2018.

On June 5, 2018, we entered into the Amended Assignment Agreement and the Amended Note with TI. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Assignment Agreement, the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC will be contingent upon TI’s payment to us of the remaining approximately $1.5 million in five payments by September 20, 2019. Under the terms of the Amended Note, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in

31

Table of Contents

13 equal quarterly installments starting on December 20, 2019. The payments of $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million, due March 20, 2019, June 20, 2019, and September 20, 2019, respectively, under the Amended Assignment Agreement, have not been received at the time of this filing. In September 2019, we sent TI a notice to cure default with a deadline of October 31, 2019. TI failed to cure the noticed default and we have since terminated TI’s distributor agreement. As a result, the BPC accounts receivable and related accounts receivable reserve of $4.8 million were written off.

Loss of a significant customer could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

E-Finity and Horizon accounted for approximately 14% and 11%, respectively,12% of our revenue for Fiscal 2017.2020. Additionally, E-Finity DTC and RSP, accounted for 29%, 12% and 10%, respectively,14% of net accounts receivable as of March 31, 2017.2020. The loss of E-Finity Horizon or any other significant customer could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to develop sufficiently trained applications engineering, installation and service support to serve our targeted markets.

Our ability to identify and develop business relationships with companies who can provide quality, cost‑effective application engineering, installation and service can significantly affect our success. The application engineering and proper installation of our microturbines, as well as proper maintenance and service, are critical to the performance of the units. Additionally, we need to reduce the total installed cost of our microturbines to enhance market opportunities. Our inability to improve the quality of applications, installation and service while reducing associated costs could affect the marketability of our products.

Changes in our product components may require us to replace parts held at distributors.

We have entered into agreements with some of our distributors requiring that if we render parts obsolete in inventories they own and hold in support of their obligations to serve fielded microturbines, we are required to replace the affected stock at no cost to the distributors. It is possible that future changes in our product technology could involve costs that have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow or financial position.

We operate in a highly regulated business environment, and changes in regulation could impose significant costs on us or make our products less economical, thereby affecting demand for our microturbines.

Our products are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations, governing, among other things, emissions and occupational health and safety. Regulatory agencies may impose special requirements for the implementation and operation of our products or that may significantly affect or even eliminate some of our target markets. We may incur material costs or liabilities in complying with government regulations. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with evolving environmental and health and safety laws,

24


Table of Contents

regulations and requirements that may be adopted or imposed in the future. Furthermore, our potential utility customers must comply with numerous laws and regulations. The deregulation of the utility industry may also create challenges for our marketing efforts. For example, as part of electric utility deregulation, federal, state and local governmental authorities may impose transitional charges or exit fees, which would make it less economical for some potential customers to switch to our products. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to obtain these approvals and changes in a timely manner, or at all. Non‑compliance with applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

The market for electricity and generation products is heavily influenced by federal and state government regulations and policies. The deregulation and restructuring of the electric industry in the United States and elsewhere may cause rule changes that may reduce or eliminate some of the advantages of such deregulation and restructuring. We cannot determine how any deregulation or restructuring of the electric utility industry may ultimately affect the market for our microturbines. Changes in regulatory standards or policies could reduce the level of investment in the research and development of alternative power sources, including microturbines. Any reduction or termination of such programs could increase the cost to our potential customers, making our systems less desirable, and thereby adversely affect our revenue and other operating results.

32

Table of Contents

Utility companies or governmental entities could place barriers to our entry into the marketplace, and we may not be able to effectively sell our products.

Utility companies or governmental entities could place barriers on the installation of our products or the interconnection of the products with the electric grid. Further, they may charge additional fees to customers who install on‑site generation or have the capacity to use power from the grid for back‑up or standby purposes. These types of restrictions, fees or charges could hamper the ability to install or effectively use our products or increase the cost to our potential customers for using our systems. This could make our systems less desirable, thereby adversely affecting our revenue and other operating results. In addition, utility rate reductions can make our products less competitive which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. The cost of electric power generation bears a close relationship to natural gas and other fuels. However, changes to electric utility tariffs often require lengthy regulatory approval and include a mix of fuel types as well as customer categories. Potential customers may perceive the resulting swings in natural gas and electric pricing as an increased risk of investing in on‑site generation.

We may not achieve production cost reductions necessary to competitively price our products, which would adversely affect our sales.

We believe that we will need to reduce the unit production cost of our products over time to maintain our ability to offer competitively priced products. Our ability to achieve cost reductions will depend on our ability to develop low cost design enhancements, to obtain necessary tooling and favorable supplier contracts and to increase sales volumes so we can achieve economies of scale. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve any such production cost reductions. Our failure to achieve such cost reductions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

During the second quarter ofWe have effected reductions in our fiscal year ended March 31, 2016,operating costs and, as a result, our ability to cut costs further and sustain our business initiatives may be limited.

Beginning in April 2015, we removed approximately $51.6 million, for 186 units, representing 63.8 megawatts, of backlog from BPC Engineering, one of our Russian distributors. This removal aligned the backloghave implemented various initiatives to our management’s expectations based on the global macroeconomic environment during our fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, such as the volatilityreduce operating costs across all functions of the global oilCompany and gas market,focus our business efforts on our most promising near-term product opportunities. As a strong U.S. dollar (makingresult of these cost-cutting initiatives, we may have a more limited ability to further reduce costs to increase our products more expensive overseas) and on-going geopolitical tensions involving Russia. In addition, we removedliquidity should such measures become necessary. Any further reductions may have a portion ofmaterially negative impact on our TA100 backlog of approximately $2.4 million, for 17 units representing 1.7 megawatts, from Calnetix Power Solutions, Inc. during the first quarter of our fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. This removal aligned our TA100 backlog with our management’s decision to limit future production of TA100 systems on a case-by-case basis for key customers.

25


Table of Contents

business.

Potential intellectual property, labor, product liability, stockholder or other litigation may adversely impact our business.

From time to time, we may face litigation relating to intellectual property, labor, product liability, stockholder and other matters. An adverse judgment could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations, the trading price of our common stock and our ability to obtain future financing on favorable terms or at all. Whether or not resolved in a manner adverse to us, any litigation could be costly, divert management attention or result in increased costs of doing business. Further, our insurance coverage is limited for these and other claims against us, and we may not have adequate insurance or financial resources to pay for our liabilities or losses from any such claims.

Our business could be negatively impacted if we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or if third parties claim that we are in violation of their intellectual property rights.

We view our intellectual property rights as important assets. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as licensing and confidentiality agreements. These protections may not be adequate to prevent third parties from using our intellectual property without our authorization, breaching any confidentiality agreements with us, copying or reverse engineering our products, or developing and marketing products that are substantially equivalent to or superior to our own. The unauthorized use of our intellectual property by others could reduce our competitive advantage and harm our business. If it became necessary for us to litigate to protect these rights, any proceedings could be burdensome and costly and we may not prevail. We cannot guarantee that any patents, issued or pending, will provide us with any competitive advantage or will not be challenged by third parties. Moreover, the expiration of our patents may lead to increased competition with respect to

33

Table of Contents

certain products. In addition, we cannot be certain that we do not or will not infringe third parties’ intellectual property rights. Any such claim, even if it is without merit, may be expensive and time‑consuming to defend, subject us to damages, cause us to cease making, using or selling certain products that incorporate the disputed intellectual property, require us to redesign our products, divert management time and attention and/or require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing arrangements.

Our results of operations could be materiallyWe face security and adversely affected bycybersecurity risks related to cyberour electronic processing of sensitive and confidential business and product data. If we are unable to protect our data or the data of our customers, a security threats.breach could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business.

As a manufacturer of high technology commercial products, we face security and cyber security threats, as well as the potential for business disruptions associated with information technology failures or cyber security attacks. We routinely experience cyber security threats, threats to our information technology infrastructure and attempts to gain access to our sensitive information. Because ofGiven the evolving nature of theseour business, we collect process and retain sensitive and confidential customer and associate data, in addition to proprietary business information. Our business, including our turbines and related energy assets may be vulnerable to a data compromise, computer viruses, physical and electronic break-ins and manipulations and similar disruptions, which may not be prevented by our efforts to secure our computer systems and assets, which include vulnerability scans and patching, network firewalls, identity and access management, data encryption, intrusion detection and prevention devices. Regular penetration tests of our networks are conducted by a third party service provider and we leverage any findings to further enhance our security. We also employ secure file transfer options to provide security threats,for processing, transmission and storage of confidential information. Our critical data is backed up to a separate secured data storage facility. However, our efforts may not be able to prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks and a successful breach of our computer systems could result in misappropriation of personal, payment or sensitive business information. In addition, we rely on associates, contractors and other third parties who may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to obtain such information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving such information. A security breach involving confidential and proprietary data or the impactfleet of any future incident cannot be predicted.turbines we have deployed across the globe for our customers could damage our reputation and our ability to retain existing customers or gain new customers. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect our results of operations, the services we provide to customers, the competitive advantages derived from our R&D efforts, the usefulness of our products and services, our reputation orand our stock price.price could be impacted.  In addition, we may incur material liabilities and remediation costs as a result of a security breach and, our insurance may not be sufficient to cover the impact to the business. Although we have developed mitigating security controls to reduce our cyber risk and protect our data and our products, our customers’ data and our customers’ turbines from a security breach, such measures cannot provide absolute security and accordingly any security breach may have a material adverse effect on our business.  Moreover, changing privacy laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, including the adoption by the European Union of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which became effective May 2018, creates new individual privacy rights and imposes increased obligations on companies handling personal data. Consequently, we may incur significant costs related to prevention and compliance with laws regarding the protection and unauthorized disclosure of personal information. A failure to comply with the stringent rules of the GDPR could result in fines of up to €20 million. Further, a greater number of our employees are working remotely in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related government actions, which could expose us to greater risks related to cybersecurity and our information technologies systems.

We may incur costs and liabilities as a result of product liability claims.

We face a risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products is alleged to have resulted in injury or other damage. Although we currently maintain product liability insurance coverage, we may not be able to obtain such insurance on acceptable terms in the future, if at all, or obtain insurance that will provide adequate coverage against potential claims. Product liability claims can be expensive to defend and can divert the attention of management and other personnel for long periods of time, regardless of the ultimate outcome. A significant unsuccessful product liability defense could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we believe our business depends on the strong brand reputation we have developed. If our reputation is damaged, we may face difficulty in maintaining our market share and pricing with respect to some of our products, which could reduce our sales and profitability.

34

Table of Contents

We have significant tax assets, usage of which may be subject to limitations in the future.

At March 31, 2017,2020, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $678$643.7 million and $160.2$162.0 million, respectively, which may be utilized to reduce future taxable income, subject to limitations under

26


Table of Contents

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. These deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. Any subsequent accumulations of common stock ownership leading to a change of control under Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including through sales of stock by large stockholders, all of which are outside of our control, could limit and defer our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards to offset future federal income tax liabilities.

Activities necessary to integrate any future acquisitions may result in costs in excess of current expectations or be less successful than anticipated.

We may acquire other businesses in the future and the success of these transactions will depend on, among other things, our ability to develop productive relationships with the corresponding distributors and to integrate assets and personnel, if any, acquired in these transactions and to apply our internal controls processes to these acquired businesses. The integration of any acquired businesses or significant assets may require significant attention from our management, and the diversion of management’s attention and resources could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manage our business. Furthermore, we may not realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipated when we first enter into these transactions. If actual integration costs are higher than amounts assumed, if we are unable to integrate the assets and personnel acquired in an acquisition as anticipated, or if we are unable to fully benefit from anticipated synergies, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Operational restructuring may result in asset impairment or other unanticipated charges.

As a result of our corporate strategy, we have identified opportunities to outsource to third‑party suppliers certain functions which we currently perform. We believe outsourcing can reduce product costs, improve product quality and increase operating efficiency. These actions may not yield the expected results, and outsourcing may result in production delays or lower quality products. Transitioning to outsourcing may cause certain of our affected employees to leave before the outsourcing is complete. This could result in a lack of the experienced in‑house talent necessary to successfully implement the outsourcing. Further, depending on the nature of operations outsourced and the structure of agreements we reach with suppliers to perform these functions, we may experience impairment in the value of manufacturing assets related to the outsourced functions or other unanticipated charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We may not be able to manage our growth effectively, expand our production capabilities or improve our operational, financial and management information systems, which would impair our results of operations.

If we are successful in executing our business plan, we will experience growth in our business that could place a significant strain on our business operations, management and other resources. Our ability to manage our growth will require us to expand our production capabilities, continue to improve our operational, financial and management information systems, and to motivate and effectively manage our employees. We cannot provide assurance that our systems, procedures and controls or financial resources will be adequate, or that our management will keep pace with this growth. We cannot provide assurance that our management will be able to manage this growth effectively.

Our success depends in significant part upon the continuing service of management and key employees.

Our success depends in significant part upon the continuing service of our executive officers, senior management and sales and technical personnel. The failure of our personnel to execute our strategy or our failure to retain management and personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our success will be dependent on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees. There can be no assurance that we can do so.

35

Table of Contents

Our internal control systems rely on employees trained in the execution of the controls. Loss of these employees or our inability to replace them with similarly skilled and trained individuals or new processes in a timely manner could adversely impact our internal control mechanisms.

27


Table of Contents

Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake and other events beyond our control.

Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake and other events beyond our control. Our executive offices, manufacturing facility, and manufacturing facilitiesauxiliary inventory storage facility are located in southern California. Because the southern California area is located in an earthquake‑sensitive area, we are particularly susceptible to the risk of damage to, or total destruction of, our facilities in southern California and the surrounding transportation infrastructure, which could affect our ability to make and transport our products. If an earthquake, fire or other natural disaster occurs at or near our facilities, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot be certain of the future effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we are unable to maintain effective internal controls over our financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in our ability to provide reliable and timely financial reports and the value of our common stock may decline.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to include in our annual reports on Form 10-K our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. This assessment includes disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal controls over financial reporting. Our management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of March 31, 2017.2020. We may in the future identify material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting that we have not discovered to date. If we cannot adequately maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, we might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC. Any such action could adversely affect our financial results and the market price of our securities.

We are subject to a number of pending lawsuits.

We and certain of our current and former officers are named as defendants in a shareholder class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, and in a separate but similar lawsuit brought by two individual shareholders in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Additionally, we and certain of our current and former officers and directors are named as defendants in various state and federal derivative suits. We may be named as defendants in future lawsuits. These current and future matters may result in significant liabilities and diversion of our management’s time, attention and resources. Given the uncertain nature of litigation generally, we are not able in all cases to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in these matters. In view of these uncertainties, the outcome of these matters may result in charges in excess of any established reserves and, to the extent available, liability insurance. Protracted litigation, including any adverse outcomes, may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, any significant judgment or settlement amount may require us to incur additional indebtedness, adversely affect our liquidity and ability to service our indebtedness, or require us to restructure or amend the terms of our indebtedness. See Item 3—Legal Proceedings of this Form 10-K for more information regarding currently pending legal proceedings.

If we continue to fail to meet all applicable Nasdaq Capital Market requirements and Nasdaq determines to delist our common stock, the delisting could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock, impair the value of your investment and adversely affect our ability to raise needed funds.

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements. On December 12, 2016,November 23, 2018, we received a notice from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) stating that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, preceding the notice date, the closing bid price for our common stock had been below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).  In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have beenwere provided 180 calendar days, or until June 12, 2017,May 22, 2019, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. On June 13, 2017May 23, 2019, we were affordedreceived notice that in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Listing

36

Table of Contents

Qualifications Department of Nasdaq had granted us an additional 180-day grace period180 days, or until November 18, 2019, to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement under Nasdaq Marketplace Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). The May 23, 2019 notification letter had no effect at that time on the listing of our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market or trading of our common stock. We provided written notice of our intention to cure the minimum bid price deficiency during this additional 180-day period by effecting a reverse stock split if necessary. On October 21, 2019, following votes of our board of directors and stockholders, we effected a one-for-ten (1:10) reverse stock split of our common stock. On November 5, 2019, we received written notification from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Staff indicating that the bid price for our common stock closed at or above $1.00 per share for at least 10 consecutive business days. Accordingly, we regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. In order to regain compliance, the bid price of our common stock must close at $1.00 per share or morerequirement for a minimum of ten consecutive business days, at which time Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department would provide written confirmation of our compliance. We may need to implement a reverse stock split to regain compliance withcontinued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market pursuant to Nasdaq Marketplace Listing Rules.Rule 5550(a)(2).

 

If we continue to fail to meet all applicable Nasdaq Capital Market requirements in the future and Nasdaq

28


Table of Contents

determines to delist our common stock, the delisting could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations. This delisting could also impair the value of your investment.

The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile and you could lose all or part of your investment in our securities.

An investment in our securities is risky, and stockholders could lose their investment in our securities or suffer significant losses and wide fluctuations in the market value of their investment. The market price of our common stock is highly volatile and is likely to continue to be highly volatile. Given the continued uncertainty surrounding many variables that may affect our business and the industry in which we operate, our ability to foresee results for future periods is limited. This variability could affect our operating results and thereby adversely affect our stock price. Many factors that contribute to this volatility are beyond our control and may cause the market price of our common stock to change, regardless of our operating performance. Factors that could cause fluctuation in our stock price may include, among other things:

·

actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;

·

market sentiment toward alternative energy stocks in general or toward us;

·

changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;

·

conditions or trends in our industry or the overall economy;

·

loss of one or more of our significant customers;

·

errors, omissions or failures by third parties in meeting commitments to us;

·

changes in the market valuations or earnings of our competitors or other technology companies;

·

the trading of options on our common stock;

·

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, divestitures, joint ventures or other strategic initiatives;

·

announcements of significant market events, such as power outages, regulatory changes or technology changes;

·

changes in the estimation of the future size and growth rate of our market;

·

future equity financings;

37

Table of Contents

·

the failure to produce our products on a timely basis in accordance with customer expectations;

·

the inability to obtain necessary components on time and at a reasonable cost;

·

litigation or disputes with customers or business partners;

·

capital commitments;

·

additions or departures of key personnel;

29


Table of Contents

·

sales or purchases of our common stock;

·

the trading volume of our common stock;

·

developments relating to litigation or governmental investigations; and

·

further decreases in or continued low levels of oil, natural gas and electricity prices.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the Nasdaq Capital Market and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies affected. The market prices of securities of technology companies and companies servicing the technology industries have been particularly volatile. These broad market and industry factors may cause a material decline in the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class–action litigation has often been instituted against that company. This type of litigation, regardless of whether we prevail on the underlying claim, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially harm our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of a proxy contest.

In March 2016, we received a letter from an owner of shares of our common stock giving notice of such stockholder’s intention to nominate nine director candidates for election to our board of directors at our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. We sent a response letter to the stockholder indicating that its notice letter was deficient because it did not meet the requirements prescribed under our bylaws. A proxy contest involving the stockholder or litigation regarding the stockholder’s eligibility to nominate director candidates at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders ultimately did not ensue, however, we could become engaged in a proxy contest with another activist stockholder in the future.

A proxy contest and any related litigation would require us to incur significant legal and advisory fees, proxy solicitation expenses and administrative and associated costs and require significant time and attention by management, our board of directors and employees, and would divert the attention of our board of directors and senior management from the pursuit of our business strategy, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and control, our ability to execute on our strategy, or changes to the composition of our board of directors or senior management team arising from a proxy contest could lead to the perception of a change in the direction of our business, instability or lack of continuity which may be exploited by our competitors and may result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to pursue our strategic initiatives or attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. We may choose to initiate, or may become subject to, litigation as a result of the proxy contest or matters arising from the proxy contest, which would serve as a further distraction to our board of directors, management and employees and would require us to incur significant additional costs. In addition, the market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the uncertainties described above or the outcome of a proxy contest or any related litigation.

Similarly, a future proxy contest with any other activist investor could result in the turnover of a majority of our board of directors. If such a change in the composition of our board of directors were to occur, it could trigger the change of control provisions of certain agreements and arrangements to which we are a party, including the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements,Note Purchase Agreement, our Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Pay Plan and, if followed by a qualifying termination of certain of our executive officers the Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement, as amended,Agreements, between us and Darren Jamison, our President and Chief Executive Officer.Officer and other executives.

38

Table of Contents

Under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements,Note Purchase Agreement, a change of control constitutes an event of default that would entitle Bridge BankGoldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc. to, among other remedies, declare all of our outstanding borrowings under the Bridge Bank Credit AgreementsNote Purchase Agreement immediately due and payable. Under the Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Plan and the Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement, as amended, following a change of control, upon the

30


Table of Contents

occurrence of a qualifying termination of Mr. Jamison or certain of our other executive officers and employees, we will be obligated to make specified severance payments to the terminated employee.

If such a change in our board composition were to occur, and if our board of directors were unable to take certain mitigating action to avoid triggering, or if we were unable to obtain a waiver of, these and other similar change of control provisions to which we are subject, the resulting payments and other obligations required of us could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and ability to conduct our business or could otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and our NOL rights plan, as well as Delaware law, may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition at a premium price.

Provisions of our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and our stockholder rights plan, as well as provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, could discourage, delay or prevent unsolicited proposals to merge with or acquire us, even though such proposals may be at a premium price or otherwise beneficial to you. These provisions include our board’s authorization to issue shares of preferred stock, on terms the board determines in its discretion, without stockholder approval, and the following provisions of Delaware law that restrict many business combinations.

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which could prevent us from engaging in a business combination with a 15% or greater stockholder for a period of three years from the date such stockholder acquired such status unless appropriate board or stockholder approvals are obtained.

On May 6, 2016,2019, we and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. successor-in-interest to Computershare Inc., as Rights Agent, entered into a Rights Agreement (the “NOL Rights Agreement”) designed to diminish the risk that our ability to use our net operating losses and certain other tax assets to reduce potential future federal income tax obligations would become subject to limitations by reason of us experiencing an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The NOL Rights Agreement replaces the Company’s Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2016, by and between the Company and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Computershare Inc., as rights agent (the “Original Rights Agreement”).  While this NOL Rights Agreement is intended to preserve our net operating losses, it effectively deters current and future purchasers from becoming 4.99% stockholders. The NOL Rights Agreement could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders.

The market price of our common stock may be adversely affected by market conditions affecting the stock markets in general, including price and trading fluctuations on Nasdaq.

Market conditions may result in volatility in the level of, and fluctuations in, market prices of stocks generally and, in turn, our common stock and sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the market, in each case being unrelated or disproportionate to changes in our operating performance. Concerns over global stability and economic conditions in the United States and abroad have contributed to the extreme volatility of the markets which may have an effect on the market price of our common stock.

Future issuances of our common stock could lower our stock price and dilute the interests of existing stockholders.

We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future. The issuance of a substantial amount of common stock could have the effect of substantially diluting the interests of our current stockholders. In addition, the sale of a substantial amount of common stock in the public market, either in the initial issuance or in a subsequent resale by investors who acquired such common stock in a private placement, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the

31


Table of Contents

analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our

39

Table of Contents

stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends. We have never paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, any gains from an investment in our securities will likely depend on whether the price of our common stock increases.

We have not paid dividends on any of our capital stock to date and we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. Consequently, in the foreseeable future, you will likely only experience a gain from your investment in our securities if the price of our common stock increases.

 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.  Properties.

During the third quarter of Fiscal 2018, we consolidated our operations and offices into our Van Nuys location in Southern California. Our principal corporate offices, administrative, sales and marketing, R&D and support facilities consist of approximately 98,00079,000 square feet of leased office space, warehouse space and assembly, and test space located at 21211 Nordhoff Street in Chatsworth, California. This lease expires in September 2019, and we have one five‑year option to extend the term of this lease. We also lease an approximately 79,000 square footmanufacturing facility for our recuperator cores located at 16640 Stagg Street in Van Nuys, California as an engineering test and manufacturing facility for our recuperator cores. On June 7, 2017 we entered into an amendment to extend the Van Nuys facility lease agreement.California. This lease will expire in February 2023 and we have one five‑year option to extend the term of this lease. We areAdditionally, we lease approximately 9,216 square feet of warehouse space at 16701 Stagg Street in the process of consolidating our manufacturing processes into our Van Nuys, location. OnceCalifornia. This lease will expire in June 2024 and we have one five-year option to extend the term of this is complete we will be looking to sublet all or a portion of our facility in Chatsworth.lease. Management believes ourthese facilities are adequate for our current needs. We also leased an approximately 98,000 square foot facility located at 21211 Nordhoff Street in Chatsworth, California. Our lease expired in September 2019, and we moved our inventory and other property from this facility and vacated the premises.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

Federal Securities Class Action

Two putative securities class action complaints were filed against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the following captions:  David Kinney, etc. v. Capstone Turbine, et al., No. 2:15-CV-08914 on November 16, 2015 (the “Kinney Complaint”) and Kevin M. Grooms, etc. v. Capstone Turbine, et al., No. 2:15-CV-09155 on December 18,November 25, 2015 (the “Grooms Complaint”).

The putative class in the Kinney Complaint is comprised of all purchasers of the Company’s securities between November 7, 2013 and November 5, 2015.  The Kinney Complaint allegesalleged material misrepresentations and omissions in public statements regarding BPC and the likelihood that BPC would not be able to fulfill many legal and financial obligations to the Company.us.  The Kinney Complaint also allegesalleged that the Company’sour financial statements were not appropriately adjusted in light of this situation and were not maintained in accordance with GAAP, and that the Companywe lacked adequate internal controls over accounting.  The Kinney Complaint allegesalleged that these public statements and accounting irregularities constituted violations by all named defendants of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by the individual defendants. The Grooms Complaint makesmade allegations and claims that arewere substantially identical to those in the Kinney Complaint, and both complaints seeksought compensatory damages of an undisclosed amount. On January 16, 2016, several shareholders filed motions to consolidate the Kinney and Grooms actions and for appointment as lead plaintiff.  On February 29, 2016, the Court granted the motions to consolidate, and appointed a lead plaintiff.  On May 6, 2016, a Consolidated Amended Complaint with allegations and claims substantially identical to those of the Kinney Complaint was filed in the consolidated action.  The putative class period in the Consolidated Amended Complaint iswas June 12, 2014 to November 5, 2015. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint on June 17, 2016.  On March 10,

32


Table of Contents

2017, the Court issued an order granting Defendants’defendants’ motion to dismiss in its entirety with leave to amend.  Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 28,

40

Table of Contents

2017.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed June 2, 2017.  Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the motion to dismiss on July 7, 2017, and defendants filed their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on July 28, 2017. The Company has not recorded any liability ascourt vacated the hearing that was scheduled for August 18, 2017.  On February 9, 2018, the Court issued an Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss.  On March 30, 2018, defendants filed an answer to the Consolidated Amended Complaint.  On May 17, 2018, the Court issued a scheduling order setting a trial date of March 31, 2017 since any potential loss is17, 2020.  On June 26, 2018, the Court entered an order vacating all deadlines through the end of October 2018 and temporarily staying formal discovery and other proceedings to allow the parties time to conduct a mediation.  The parties participated in mediation on September 24, 2018, which did not probable or reasonably estimable givenresult in a settlement.  On November 16, 2018, after further settlement discussions, the parties advised the Court that they had reached an agreement in principle to settle the action in its entirety.  The agreement in principle was subject to several conditions, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement that was satisfactory to all parties, and preliminary natureand final approval from the court, among other things.  Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking preliminary approval of the proceedings.proposed settlement on April 12, 2019, and filed supplementary declarations in support of the motion on May 2, 2019.  Preliminary approval of the settlement was granted on May 17, 2019.  On September 24, 2019, lead counsel for plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses.  On October 25, 2019, plaintiffs filed a motion for final approval of the settlement.  On November 15, 2019, the Court issued an order approving the settlement and the payment of attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and class representative payments, and entering final judgment in the action.  Our insurance carrier funded the settlement amount. 

Federal Individual Securities Action

An individual securities complaint was filed against us, our Chief Executive Officer, and additional unidentified defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the following caption:  FiveT Investment Management LTD, et al., v. Capstone Turbine, et al., No. 2:18-CV-03512 on April 25, 2018.  The lawsuit alleged material misrepresentations and omissions regarding our revenue, sales, and operations because of alleged improper revenue recognition and backlog calculations related to BPC.  The lawsuit alleged that these statements constituted violations by all named defendants of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by the individual defendants.  The complaint also asserted claims against all named defendants for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, violations of California Civil Code sections 1709 and 1710, and California Corporations Code sections 25400 and 25401.  Additionally, the complaint asserted a cause of action against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty.  It demanded compensatory damages for the amount of damages allegedly suffered, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and fees.

On June 29, 2018, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint for Common Law Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation.  The Amended Complaint asserted claims for common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation, against the Company, Mr. Jamison, and unidentified individual defendants.  The Amended Complaint demanded damages in an unspecified amount, plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and fees.  Defendants filed their answer to the Amended Complaint on August 17, 2018.  The parties participated in a mediation on September 24, 2018.  The mediation did not result in a settlement.  On October 12, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint, seeking to reinstate the cause of action for violation of California Civil Code section 25401.  On November 29, 2018, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend and plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint, which asserted claims for common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of California Civil Code section 25401 against the Company, Mr. Jamison, and unidentified individual defendants.  On December 20, 2018, defendants filed their answer to the Second Amended Complaint.  On June 6, 2019, the parties reached a confidential settlement of the action and the suit was dismissed with prejudice on July 1, 2019.  Our insurance carrier funded the settlement amount.

State Derivative Lawsuits — California

On February 18, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in the State of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors under the following caption:  Stesiak v. Jamison, et al., No. BC610782.  The lawsuit alleges that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants failed to timely adjust the Company’sour account receivables and backlog to reflect BPC’s inability to pay the Company.us.  The

41

Table of Contents

complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment, that the Companywe institute corporate governance reforms, and disgorgement from the individual defendants.  On May 5, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part.  On May 10, 2016, the Court entered that proposed order.  Given thatOn March 9, 2018, following the Court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in the federal securities class action, was dismissed with leavethe parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to amend,stay this case is still stayed.action until the close of fact discovery in the federal securities class action.  On March 20, 2018, the Court entered that proposed order.  A status conference is scheduled for September 20, 2017.July 1, 2020.

On June 8, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action entitled Velma Kilpatrick v. Simon, et al., No. BC623167, was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in the State of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors.  The complaint alleges that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants failed to timely adjust the Company’sour account receivables and backlog to reflect BPC’s inability to pay the Company.us.  The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties, and that the Companywe institute corporate governance reforms.  On August 23, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part.  Given thatOn March 9, 2018, following the Court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in the federal securities class action, was dismissed with leavethe parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to amend,stay this case is still stayed.action until the close of fact discovery in the federal securities class action.  On March 20, 2018 the Court entered that proposed order.  A status conference is scheduled for SeptemberJune 26, 2017.2020.

On December 27, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action entitled Andre Rosowsky v. Jamison, et al., No. 30-2016-00894859-CU-MC-CJC was filedThe parties in Orange County Superior Court in the State of California against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors. The complaint alleges that certainboth of the Company’s current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations toabove state derivative lawsuits participated in a mediation held on September 24, 2018.  On May 6, 2019, the Company, but allowed the Company to make false and misleading statementsparties reached an agreement in principle regarding BPC and the Company’s financial condition.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants failed to timely adjust the Company’s account receivables and backlog to reflect BPC’s inability to pay the Company.  The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Company as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties, that the Company institute corporate governance reforms to be implemented in settlement of the action.  The parties have not yet formalized a settlement, however, which is subject to several conditions, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement that is satisfactory to all parties and restitutionpreliminary and final approval from the individual defendants. On April 14, 2017,court, among other things.  Settlement discussions are ongoing.  We have not recorded any liability as of March 31, 2020 as our insurance carrier will fund the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On May 5, 2017, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his complaint without prejudice.settlement amount.

Federal Derivative Lawsuits

On March 7, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors under the following caption:  Haber v. Jamison, et al., No. CV16-01569-DMG (RAOx).  The lawsuit alleges that certain of the

33


Table of Contents

Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The complaint asserts a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties, and equitable relief, including that the Companywe institute appropriate corporate governance reforms.  On May 11, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part. On May 13, 2016, the Court entered that proposed order.  Given that the federal securities class action was dismissed with leave to amend, this case is still stayed.

On July 12, 2016 and July 18, 2016, respectively, two additional purported shareholder derivative actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors, under the caption Tuttle v. Atkinson, et al., No. CV16-05127, and Boll v. Jamison, et al., No. CV16-5282, respectively.  The lawsuits allege that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The Tuttle complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, and unjust enrichment, and the Boll complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets.  Both complaints demand damages sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breaches of fiduciary

42

Table of Contents

duties, and equitable relief, including that the Companywe institute appropriate corporate governance reforms.  The federal derivative actions have beenwere stayed until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part.  Given thatOn March 9, 2018, following the Court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in the federal securities class action, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until the close of fact discovery in the federal securities class action.  On March 13, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation.

The parties in the above federal derivative lawsuits participated in a mediation held on September 24, 2018.  On May 6, 2019, the parties reached an agreement in principle regarding corporate governance reforms to be implemented in settlement of the action.  The parties have not yet formalized a settlement, however, which is subject to several conditions, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement that is satisfactory to all parties and preliminary and final approval from the court, among other things.  Settlement discussions are ongoing.  We have not recorded any liability as of March 31, 2020 as our insurance carrier will fund the settlement amount.

Capstone Turbine Corporation v. Regatta Solutions, Inc.

On August 23, 2018, we initiated arbitration proceedings against its former distributor, Regatta Solutions, Inc. (“Regatta”), with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), under the following caption: Capstone Turbine Corp. v. Regatta Solutions, Inc., Case No. 01-18-0003-0860 (the “Capstone-Regatta Arbitration”). We have alleged claims against Regatta for breach of contract and unjust enrichment relating to the parties’ prior distributor relationship, which terminated at the end of March of 2018, and the related wind-down agreement between the parties. As remedies for these claims, we are seeking compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages, along with declaratory relief and attorney’s fees, interest, and costs.  

On October 18, 2018, Regatta filed its answer and cross-claims in the Capstone-Regatta Arbitration. In its cross-claims, Regatta asserted claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, fraud, and intentional interference with contractual relations, relating to the parties’ agreement to wind-down relations and Regatta’s purported sales efforts in California. As remedies for these alleged claims, Regatta sought no less than $1.5 million in general and compensatory damages, along with punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney’s fees and costs. We have filed and served an answering statement denying Regatta’s counterclaims and asserting several affirmative defenses.

Also on October 18, 2018, Regatta filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, alleging two counts of fraud, and one count of interference with contractual relations, individually against Mr. James Crouse, then Executive Vice President of Sales for the Company, arising out of the same allegations made in Regatta’s counterclaim. As remedies for these alleged claims, Regatta again sought no less than $1.5 million in general and compensatory damages, along with punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney’s fees and costs. The case was filed under the caption Regatta Solutions, Inc., v. Jim Crouse, et. al., Case No. 30-2018-01026571-CU-FR-CJC. On December 14, 2018, Regatta stipulated and agreed to arbitrate its claims against Mr. James Crouse and dismissed him from the Superior Court action.

On January 16, 2019, the parties participated in a mediation that did not resolve the dispute. The parties continued their settlement discussions and held a follow-on mediation on April 24, 2019 at which point the parties came to a resolution of the matter. Following initial compliance with the settlement terms, Regatta breached its obligations thereunder and the parties thereafter resolved the continuing dispute at a further mediation on January 29, 2020. As of March 31, 2020, Regatta met all of its material obligations under the settlement terms, and all matters related to the litigation were dismissed with leaveprejudice on April 10, 2020. The settlement did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Capstone Turbine Corporation v. Turbine International, LLC.

On February 3, 2020, Capstone Turbine Corporation filed suit against its former distributor, TI, in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles under the following caption: Capstone Turbine Corporation v. Turbine International, LLC; Case No. 20STCV04372 (“Capstone-Turbine Intl. Litigation”). We have alleged claims

43

Table of Contents

against Turbine Intl. for breach of contract and for injunctive relief relating to amend,the parties’ prior distributor relationship, which terminated at the end of March of 2018, and Turbine Intl.’s failure to satisfy its payment obligations under certain financial agreements, namely an accounts receivable agreement and promissory note in favor of Capstone. As remedies for these casesclaims, we are still stayed.seeking compensatory, consequential, along with injunctive relief and attorney’s fees, interest, and costs.  

On March 18, 2020, Turbine Intl. filed its answer and cross-claims in the Capstone-Turbine Intl. Litigation. In its cross-claims, Turbine Intl. has asserted claims against Capstone, and individually against Mr. James Crouse, Capstone’s Chief Revenue Officer, for breach of contract under the distributor agreement, accounts receivable agreement and promissory note, fraud, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, negligent misrepresentation, violation of the unfair practices act, violation of racketeer influenced corrupt organizations act, and conspiracy to commit fraud. As remedies for these alleged claims, Turbine Intl. are seeking compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages along with attorney’s fees, interest, and costs. Capstone answered the cross-claims on May 7, 2020. A case management conference is scheduled for August 19, 2020. We have not recorded any liability as of March 31, 2020, as no loss is expected.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

3444


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CPST”. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements. On December 12, 2016, we received a notice from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department stating that, for 30 consecutive business days preceding the notice date, the closing bid price for our common stock had been below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).  In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we were provided 180 calendar days, or until June 12, 2017, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. On June 13, 2017 we were afforded an additional 180-day grace period to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. In order to regain compliance, the bid price of our common stock must close at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of ten consecutive business days, at which time Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department would provide written confirmation of our compliance. We may need to implement a reverse stock split to regain compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules. 

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for each period indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

High

    

Low

 

Year Ended March 31, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

2.70

 

$

1.25

 

Second Quarter

 

$

1.97

 

$

1.31

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.48

 

$

0.66

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.93

 

$

0.67

 

Year Ended March 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

13.60

 

$

7.40

 

Second Quarter

 

$

8.80

 

$

6.00

 

Third Quarter

 

$

6.40

 

$

1.16

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

1.69

 

$

1.00

 

As of June 6, 2017, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market was $0.67 per share.

Stockholders

As of June 6, 2017,26, 2020, there were 238236 stockholders of record of our common stock. This does not include the number of persons whose stock is held in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers.

Dividend PolicyDividends

We currently intend to retain any earnings for use in our business and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. InWe currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings, if any, to fund the future, the decision to paydevelopment and expansion of our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will depend uponbe made at the discretion of our resultsboard of operations, financial condition, cash flow and capital expenditure plans, as well as such other factors as our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may consider relevant. Additionally, the consent of Bridge Bank would be necessary in order for us to declare and pay a dividend in accordance withdirectors. In addition, the terms of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements.our outstanding indebtedness restrict our ability to pay cash dividends, and any future indebtedness that we may incur could preclude us from paying cash dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan.

Information about our equity compensation plans in Item 11 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

ThereOn February 10, 2020, in connection with a sponsorship agreement involving an equity-based payment to a non-employee recipient, we issued $600,000 in unregistered shares of common stock of the Company to the recipient. This transaction was exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The recipient of restricted shares of our common stock in this transaction represented their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were no salesplaced upon the stock certificates issued in these transactions.

On February 26, 2020, in connection with a consulting agreement involving an equity-based payment to a non-employee recipient, we issued 100,000 unregistered shares of unregisteredcommon stock of the Company to the recipient. This transaction was exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The recipient of restricted shares of our common stock in this transaction represented their intentions to acquire the securities duringfor investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were placed upon the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2017.

35


Table of Contents

stock certificates issued in these transactions.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

There were no repurchases of shares of common stock made during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2020.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this Item.

3645


Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward‑looking statements. Factors that might cause a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A (Risk Factors) in this Form 10-K. The following section is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information, including our financial statements and the notes thereto, which appears elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Overview

We are the market leader in microturbines based on the number of microturbines sold. Generally, power purchased from the electric utility grid is less costly than power produced by distributed generation technologies. Utilities may also charge fees to interconnect to their power grids. However, we can provide economic benefits to end users in instances where the waste heat from our microturbine has value (combined heat(CHP) and power (“CHP”) and combined cooling, heat and power (“CCHP”))(CCHP), where fuel costs are low (renewable energy/renewable fuels), where the costs of connecting to the grid may be high or impractical (such as remote power applications), where reliability and power quality are of critical importance, or in situations where peak shaving could be economically advantageous because of highly variable electricity prices. Our microturbines can be interconnected to other distributed energy resources to form “microgrids” (also called “distribution networks”) located within a specific geographic area and provide power to a group of buildings. Because Capstoneour microturbines can provide a reliable source of power and can operate on multiple fuel sources, management believes they offer a level of flexibility not currently offered by other technologies such as reciprocating engines.

We continueOur goals for Fiscal 2020 were to execute onimprove cash flow, working capital, and our three-pronged business profitability plan to reduce operating expenses;balance sheet; grow revenue through accelerating global product sales; diversify into additional market verticals and geographies; and increase revenue; and improve gross margin.aftermarket sales absorption. During Fiscal 20172020 our net loss decreased by 5% to $23.9was $22.0 million and our basic and diluted loss per share improved by 46% to $0.75was $2.70 compared to $25.2$16.7 million and $1.39,$2.49, respectively, in the same period of the previous year. The improvementincrease in the net loss during Fiscal 20172020 was primarily the resultbecause of a reduction oflower revenue, higher operating expenses of approximately 30% from Fiscal 2016.costs and interest expense. The improvementdecrease in revenue was primarily due to weakness in the net loss per sharenatural resources market due to declining oil prices, as well as COVID-19 shutdowns and movement restrictions that resulted in delays in certain customers’ project timelines and product shipments in all of our global markets. Product revenue was lower primarily due to weakening in the United States natural resources market. Additionally, we build to a fixed number of production slots for our microturbines each quarter and during Fiscal 20172020, we allocated five C1000 Signature Series systems production slots to our long-term rental program, resulting in lower product revenue. The increase in operating expense was primarily attributable to higher marketing costs and bad debt expense recorded during Fiscal 2020. On February 4, 2019, we entered into a $30.0 million three-year term note with Goldman Sachs to replace the result of an increaseexisting $15.0 million revolving credit facility with Bridge Bank, which resulted in weighted average shares outstanding to 32.1 million forhigher interest expense during Fiscal 2017 from 18.2 million for Fiscal 2016. Our accessories, parts and service revenue increased 8% to a record high of $28.9 million or 37% of total revenue2020 compared to $26.8 million or 31%Fiscal 2019. Fiscal 2020 was characterized by growth of total revenue in Fiscal 2016 as global microturbine installations and factory protection plan revenue continued to expand. During Fiscal 2017, our aftermarket service business because of additional revenue from the Russian market was approximately 11% of revenueour FPP long-term service contracts and rental income from our factory rental program compared to 2% of revenueFiscal 2019. Additionally, the same period last year as we continue to rebuild our business in the Russian market by adding additional distributors in RussiaU.S. dollar has strengthened against other currencies and the Commonwealth of Independent States (“CIS”). Our revenue continues to be negatively impacted byan issue in select markets as the volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar (makingmakes our products more expensive overseas) and ongoing geopolitical tensions in Russia, North Africa and the Middle East.those markets, as we sell in U.S. dollars.

Our products continue to gain interest in all six of the major vertical markets (energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural resources, critical power supply, transportationmicrogrid and marine)transportation). In the energy efficiency market, we continue to expand our market presence in hotels, office buildings, hospitals, retail and industrial applications globally. The renewable energy market is fueled by landfill gas, biodiesel, and biogas from sources such as food processing, agricultural waste and cow, pig and chickenlivestock manure. Our product sales in the oil and gas and other natural resources market is driven by our microturbines’ reliability, emissions profile and ease of installation. Given the volatility of the oil and gas market, however, we have refocused our business strategy is to target projects within the energy efficiency and renewalrenewable energy markets. The actual shiftWe also continued to the energy efficiency market is reflected in the product shipment by vertical markets table on page 38. We have also seen increasedsee interest in critical power supply applications as customers want solutions that can handle both primary and backup power. Transportation is a developing market segment for us and currently transportation products were only for customer demonstrations.

46

Table of Contents

We continue to focus on improving our products based on customer input, building brand awareness and new channels to market by developing a diversified network of strategic distribution partners. Our focus is on products and solutions that provide near term opportunities to drive repeatable business rather than discrete projects for niche markets. In addition, management closely monitors operating expenses and strives to improve manufacturing efficiencies while simultaneously lowering direct material costs and increasing average selling prices. The key drivers to our success are

37


Table of Contents

revenue growth, higher average selling prices, lower direct material costs, positive new order flow and reduced cash usage.

An overview of our direction, targets and key initiatives follows:

1)

Focus on Vertical Markets  Within the distributed generation markets that we serve, we focus on vertical markets that we identify as having the greatest near-term potential. In our primary products and applications (energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural resources, critical power supply, microgrid and transportation products and marine)products), we identify specific targeted vertical market segments. Within each of these segments, we identify what we believe to be the critical factors to success and base our plans on those factors. Given the volatility of the oil and gas market, we have refocused our business strategy to target projects within the energy efficiency and renewable energy markets.

The following table summarizes our product shipments by vertical markets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

Year Ended

 

 

Ended March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

2017

    

 

2016

    

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Energy efficiency

 

59

%

 

53

%

 

    

54%

 

47%

 

Natural resources

 

34

%

 

37

%

 

 

32%

 

40%

 

Renewable energy

 

 7

%

 

10

%

 

 

14%

 

7%

 

Critical Power Supply

 

<1

%

 

 —

%

 

 

 —

 

3%

 

Microgrid

 

 —

 

3%

 

Energy Efficiency—CHP/CCHP

Energy efficiency refers to the proper utilization of both electrical and thermal energies in the power production process. In such applications, our microturbines are able to maximize the availability of usable energy to provide a significant economic advantage to customers while reducing their onsite emissions. CHP and CCHP can improve site economics by capturing the waste heat created from a single combustion process to increase the efficiency of the total system, from approximately 30 percent to 80 percent or more. Compared with more traditional, independent generation sources, the increase in operational efficiency also reduces greenhouse gas emissions through the displacement of other separate systems, which can also reduce operating costs.

Natural Resources—Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Shale Gas & Mining

Our microturbines are installed in the natural resource market for use in both onshore and offshore applications, including oil and gas exploration, production, and at compression and transmission sites as a highly efficient and reliable source of power.  In some cases, these oil and gas or mining operations have no electric utility grid and rely solely on power generated onsite. There are numerous locations, on a global scale, where the drilling, production, compression and transportation of natural resources and other extraction and production processes create fuel byproducts, which are traditionally burned or released into the atmosphere. Our microturbines can turn these fuel byproducts - flare gas, or associated gas, into a useable fuel to provide prime power to these sites.

47

Table of Contents

Renewable Energy

There is a growing transition to renewable energy sources and technologies happening on a global scale. Our microturbines run efficiently on renewable fuels such as methane and other biogases from landfills, wastewater treatment facilities and renewable natural gas.  They also run efficiently on other small biogas applications like food processing plants, livestock farms and agricultural green waste operations. Microturbines can burn these renewable fuels with minimal emissions, thereby, and in some cases, avoiding the imposition of penalties incurred for pollution while simultaneously producing electricity from this “free” renewable fuel source for use at the site or in the surrounding areas. Our microturbines have demonstrated effectiveness in these smaller

38


Table of Contents

applications and may outperform conventional combustion engines in some situations, including when the gas contains a high amount of sulfur.sulfur, as the sulfur can contaminate combustion engines lube oil leading to equipment breakdowns and higher lifecycle costs.

Critical Power Supply

Because of the potentially catastrophic consequences of system failure, momentary or otherwise, certain high demand power users, including high technology, health care and information systems facilities require higher levels of reliability in their power generation service. To meet these customer requirements, traditional solutions utilize UPS to protect critical loads from power disturbances along with back-up diesel generators for extended outages. We offer an alternative solution that can both meet customer reliability requirements and reduce operating costs. We have seen continued development in the critical market segment as it relates to heath care facilities.

Microgrid

Microgrid is a group of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources that acts as a single controllable energy entity with respect to the grid. Distributed energy resources typically include other dual-mode microturbines, reciprocating engines, solar photovoltaic (PV), wind turbine, fuel cells and battery storage.  Microgrids can be connected to larger electricity grids; however, in the event of a widespread outage, the microgrid will disconnect from the main grid and continue to operate independently to maintain the electricity supply to the homes and businesses that are connected to the microgrid’s electricity network. Our microturbines have the ability to meet the needs of microgrid end-users by lowering their overall cost to operate and by providing a versatile dispatchable technology that is fuel flexible and scalable enough to fit a wide variety of applications. We have seen continued development in the microgrid market segment.

Transportation

Our technology is also can be used in HEV applications. Our customers have applied our products in HEV applications such as transit buses and Class 7 and 8 work trucks. In these applications, the microturbine acts as an onboard battery charger to recharge the battery system as needed. The benefits of microturbine-powered HEV hybrids include extended range, fuel economy gains, quieter operation, reduced emissions and higher reliability when compared with traditional internal combustion engines. Internal combustion diesel engine manufacturers have been challenged for the last several years to develop

Additionally, our technology improvements, prior to aftertreatment that reduce emissions to levels specified by the EPA and CARB 2007 and 2010 standards. Many manufacturers are incorporating aftertreatment that increases upfront equipment costs, vehicle weight and life cycle costs, which and may reduce overall engine efficiency.

Marine

Our technology is also used in marine applications. Our customers have applied our products in the commercial vessel and luxury yacht market segments. The most feasible application for our marine products is for use as a ship auxiliary engine. In this application, the microturbines provide power to the vessel’s electrical loads and, in some cases, the vessel is able to utilize the exhaust energy to increase the overall efficiency of the application, thereby reducing overall fuel consumption and emissions. Another feasible application is similar to our HEV application where the vessel is driven by an electric propulsion system and the microturbine serves as an on board range extender. Transportation is a developing market segment for us. In Fiscal 2020, transportation products were only for customer demonstrations.

48

Table of Contents

Backlog

Net product orders were $43.8approximately $33.8 million and $53.9$46.2 million for Fiscal 20172020 and Fiscal 2016,2019, respectively. Ending backlog was $113.0approximately $37.7 million at March 31, 20172020 compared to $109.6$71.3 million at March 31, 2016.2019. Book-to-bill ratio was 1.1:1.4:1 and 1.0:1.1:1 for Fiscal 20172020 and Fiscal 2016,2019, respectively. Book-to-bill ratio is the ratio of new orders we received to units shipped and billed during a period.

During the second quarter of Fiscal 2020, we removed from product backlog orders related to Green Energy Sustainable Solutions, Inc. (“GESS”) of approximately $10.6 million. This removal was the result of Capstone’s findings following further review of GESS’s ability to meet its obligations under their national account agreement.

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we removed from product backlog orders related to Regatta Solutions, our former California distributor (“Regatta”) for approximately $3.8 million. This removal was the result of the reassignment of the California sales territory to Cal Microturbine, our new exclusive distribution partner in California.

On October 13, 2017, we entered into the Assignment Agreement and the Note with TI.

Pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, we agreed to assign to TI the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC Engineering, our former Russian distributor (“BPC”), upon TI’s payment to us of $2.5 million in three payments by February 1, 2018. We received payments from TI of approximately $1.0 million under the Assignment Agreement during Fiscal 2018 which was recorded as bad debt recovery.

In connection with the terms of the Note, we granted TI the sole distribution rights for our products and services in the Russian oil and gas sector. As a result of this appointment, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 35 equal monthly installments starting in August 2018.

On October 13, 2017, we and the Guarantor, entered into the Guaranty Agreement whereby the Guarantor guarantees TI’s obligations under the Agreement and Note. However, due to our limited business relationship with TI and the missed payments on the Assignment Agreement, we deferred recognition of the Assignment Agreement and Note until collectability is reasonably assured.

On June 5, 2018, we entered into the Amended Assignment Agreement and the Amended Note with TI. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Assignment Agreement, the right, title and interest to receivables owed to us from BPC was contingent upon TI’s payment to us of the remaining approximately $1.5 million in five payments by September 20, 2019. The payments of $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million due March 20, 2019, June 20, 2019, and September 20, 2019, respectively, under the Amended Assignment Agreement, have not been received at the time of this filing. Under the terms of the Amended Note, TI agreed to pay us $3.8 million over a three-year period in 13 equal quarterly installments starting on December 20, 2019. In September 2019, we sent TI a notice to cure default with a deadline of October 31, 2019. TI failed to cure the noticed default and we have since terminated TI’s distributor agreement. As a result, the BPC accounts receivable and related accounts receivable reserve of $4.8 million were written off.

As a result of the above amendments we removed product orders related to BPC from backlog of approximately $20.4 million and $20.7 million, for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively. These removals were the result of our continuous review of BPC related backlog with TI which resulted in us no longer honoring the product pricing, and the cancellation of our distributor agreement with TI. There are no remaining backlog related to BPC as of March 31, 2020.

49

Table of Contents

A portion of our backlog is concentrated in the international oil and gas market which may impact the overall timing of shipments or the conversion of backlog to revenue. The timing of the backlog is based on the requirement date indicated by our customers. However, based on historical experience, management expects that a significant portion of our backlog may not be shipped within the next 18 months. Additionally, the timing of shipments is subject to change based on several variables (including customer deposits, payments, availability of credit and customer delivery schedule changes), most of which are not in our control and can affect the timing of our revenue. As a result, management believes the book-to-bill ratio demonstrates the current demand for our products in the given period.

2)

Sales and Distribution Channels  We seek out distributors that have business experience and capabilities to support our growth plans in our targeted markets. A significant portion of our revenue is

39


Table of Contents

derived from sales to distributors who resell our products to end users. We have 92a total of 88 distributors, OEMs and Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”).national accounts. In the United States and Canada, we currently have 23 distributors, OEMs and OEMs.national accounts. Outside of the United States and Canada, we currently have 6965 distributors, OEMs and OEMs.national accounts. We continue to refine our distribution channels to address our specific targeted markets.

Effective January 1, 2018, we launched our Distributor Support System (“DSS program”) to provide additional support for distributor business development activities, customer lead generation, brand awareness and tailored marketing services for each of our major geography and market vertical. This new program is funded by our distributors and was developed to provide improved worldwide distributor training, sales efficiency, website development, company branding and provide funding for increased strategic marketing activities. See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional discussion of revenue recognition for this program.

3)

Service  We provide service primarily through our global distribution network. Together with our global distribution network we offer a comprehensive FPP for a fixed annual fee to perform regularly scheduled and unscheduled maintenance as needed. We provide factory and on-site training to certify all personnel that are allowed to perform service on our microturbines. FPPs are generally paid quarterly in advance. Our FPP backlog at the end of Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016 was $77.1 million and $66.5 million, respectively, which represents the value of the contractual agreement for FPP services that has not been earned and extends through Fiscal 2031. Additionally, we offer new and remanufactured parts through our global distribution network. Service revenue in Fiscal 2017 was approximately 18% of total revenue.

Our FPP backlog at the end of Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 was approximately $82.4 million and $78.9 million, respectively, which represents the value of the contractual agreement for FPP services that has not been earned and extends through Fiscal 2035. Additionally, we offer new and remanufactured parts through our global distribution network. Service revenue in Fiscal 2020 was approximately 30% of total revenue.

4)

Product Robustness and Life Cycle Maintenance Costs  We continue to invest in enhancements that relate to high performance and high reliability. An important element of our continued innovation and product strategy is to focus on the engineering of our product hardware and electronics to make them work together more effectively and deliver improved microturbine performance, reliability and low maintenance cost to our customers.

5)

New Product Development    Our new product development is targeted specifically to meet the needs of our selected vertical markets. We expect that our existing product platforms, the C30, C65, C200 and C1000 Series microturbines, will be our foundational product lines for the foreseeable future. Our research and development project portfolio is centered on enhancing the features of these base products. More recently, due to our cost reduction efforts, our focus is on expanding the existing products, including the launch of our C1000 Signature Series microturbine in December 2015.

Our product development activities duringDuring Fiscal 2017 included new-patented fuel injector2020, we introduced and certificationexpanded our PowerSync family of our C65 microturbine to applicable European Union medium voltage grid interconnection standards. In addition, we continued our development in our C200S ICHP microturbine and overall cost reductioncontrollers, easily customizable for our Signature Series. We developed a new-patented multi-staged lean pre-vaporizing, pre-mixing fuel injector providing ultra-low emissions that meet EPA Tier 4 requirements for power generation. Under this new program, exhaust emissions from these engines will be required to decrease by more than 90%. Our C65, C200 and C1000 Series microturbines became VDE, BDEW and CEI certified during Fiscal 2017. These new standards were attained following the development and implementation of new microturbine system software architecture. The C200S microturbine incorporates numerous system and design upgrades intended to improve overall product quality, reliability, and performance. Our new C200S ICHP product further supportssystems. Additionally, we delivered our effort to diversify our business into the CHP and CCHP energy efficiency markets, and the new roof mounted integrated CHP heat recovery modules designed specificallyfirst production self-cleanable severe environment air filtration system for our Signature Series line of microturbine products.

50

Table of Contents

We continued on a project to modernize electronics to today’s standards, providing common functionality and enabling long term support. To support our global fleet during Fiscal 2020, we achieved Australian AS4777 certification for our C200 product line, and UK G99 Grid Interconnect type approval for our C65 and C200 product lines.  In addition, Germany released VDE 4110 for Medium Voltage Grid Interconnection, to augment the BDEW certification.  We achieved “Prototype Confirmation” for this new specification that enables continued operability in Germany.

In partnership with one of our long-term EMEA distributors, we aim to add additional revenue opportunities.developed a marine C65 for a private yacht manufacturer and in Fiscal 2020 we delivered the product and also received certification from Lloyd’s Register EMEA for Lloyd’s Register Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Special Service Craft 2018 - Part 6.

We are also developing a more efficient microturbine CHP system with the support of the DOE, which awarded us a grant of $5.0 million in support of this development program, of which $4.2 million was allocated to us and was used through September 30, 2015. We successfully completed the first phase of the development program on September 30, 2015 and achieved 270 kW with a prototype C250 microturbine in our development test lab. Management intends to continue with the next phase of development and commercialization after we achieve profitability. The next phase will be to continue development of the C250 product architecture as well as the associated power electronics and software controls required for successful commercialization.

6)

Cost and Core Competencies  We believe that the core competencies of our products are air‑bearing technology, advanced combustion technology and sophisticated power electronics to form efficient and

40


Table of Contents

ultra‑low emission electricity and cooling and heat production systems. Our core intellectual property is contained within our air‑bearing technology. We continue to review avenues for cost reduction by sourcing to the best value supply chain option. In order to utilize manufacturing facilities and technology more effectively, we are focused on continuous improvements in manufacturing processes. Additionally, considerable effort is being directed to manufacturing cost reduction through process improvement, product design, advanced manufacturing technology, supply management and logistics. Management expects to be able to leverage our costs as product volumes increase.

Our manufacturing designs include the use of conventional technology, which has been proven in high volume automotive and turbocharger production for many years. Many components used in the manufacture of our products are readily fabricated from commonly available raw materials or off the shelf items available from multiple supply sources; however, certain items are custom made to meet our specifications that require longer lead time. We believe that in most cases, adequate capacity exists at our suppliers and that alternative sources of supply are available or could be developed within a reasonable period of time. However, single source suppliers with long lead times may be more challenging to transition to another supplier. We have an ongoing program to develop alternative back up suppliers for sole source parts wherever possible, however this has been challenging with low production volumes and increased pricing. We regularly reassess the adequacy and abilities of our suppliers to meet our future needs.

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we identified a defect in one of the component parts for microturbine systems from one of our single source suppliers. As a result of this defect, we have identified several new suppliers with greater engineering expertise and robust quality management systems. The transition is complex, lengthy and may result in an interruption in our manufacturing process. An interruption in our manufacturing process for this component part would adversely impact our results of operations. The efforts to qualify and dual source these components was completed in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019.

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2018, we received notification from one of our single source suppliers that they were at maximum capacity and would require prepayment and a significant increase in the price of multiple components in order to fulfill our supply requirements for Fiscal 2019. During

51

Table of Contents

the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, we issued a prepayment of approximately $2.2 million to this single source supplier. As of March 31, 2020, there were gradual improvement trends in the capacity issues at the supplier.  A new supplier has been fully qualified and has taken over as the primary source of this commodity for Capstone.

We believe that effective execution in each of these key areas will be necessary to leverage Capstone’s promising technology and early market leadership into achieving positive cash flow with growing market presence and improving financial performance. Based on

During the third quarter of Fiscal 2018, we consolidated our recent progressoperations and assuming achievement of targeted cost reductions and product mix, pricing and performance, our financial model indicates that we will achieve positive cash flow when we generate $25 million in quarterly revenue with a 25% gross margin. We are in the process of consolidating our manufacturing processesoffices into our Van Nuys location. Welocation and we believe that once this is complete we will have aour production capacity ofis approximately 2,000 units per year, depending on product mix. We believe we will be able to support this production capacity level by adding additional shifts, which would increase working capital requirements, and making some additional capital expenditures.expenditures when necessary.

Reverse Stock Split  At the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held on August 29, 2019, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio in the range of one-for-five (1:5) to one-for-ten (1:10). Pursuant to such authority granted by the stockholders, the Company’s board of directors approved a one-for-ten (1:10) reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the common stock and the filing of the Amendment. The certificate was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware, effective on October 21, 2019 and the Reverse Stock Split became effective as of that date as filed with the SEC under the Securities and Exchange Act. Accordingly, all references to numbers of common shares, including the number of common shares on an as-if-converted basis, per-share data and share prices and exercise prices in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent liabilities. On an on‑going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including but not limited to those related to long‑lived assets, including finite‑lived intangible assets and fixed assets, bad debts, inventories, warranty obligations, stock‑based compensation, income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

·

We evaluate the carrying value of long‑lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Factors that are considered important that could trigger an impairment review include a current‑period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses and a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses or insufficient income associated with the use of a long‑lived asset or asset group. Other factors include a significant change in the manner of the use of the asset or a significant negative industry or economic trend. This evaluation is performed based on undiscounted estimated future cash flows compared with the carrying value of the related assets. If the undiscounted estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized and the loss is measured by the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the asset group. The estimated fair value of the assets is determined using the best information available. On a quarterly basis, we assess whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that potentially indicate the carrying value of long‑lived assets may not be recoverable. Intangible assets include a

52

Table of Contents

manufacturing license, technology, backlog and customer relationships. We reevaluate the useful life determinations for these intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision in their remaining useful lives. We performed an analysis as of March 31, 20172020 and 2016 and as a result, approximately $17,000 and $0.1 million of purchased TA100 backlogdetermined that there was written off to align with management’s decision to limit the production of TA100 systems on a case-by-case basis for key customers.no impairment. See Note 5—Intangible Assets in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

41


Table of Contents

·

Our inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a first in first out (“FIFO”) basis and at the lower of costbasis) or market.net realizable value. We routinely evaluate the composition of our inventories and identify slow‑moving, excess, obsolete or otherwise impaired inventories. Inventories identified as impaired are evaluated to determine if write‑downs are required. Included in this assessment is a review for obsolescence as a result of engineering changes in our product. Future product enhancement and development may render certain inventories obsolete, resulting in additional write‑downs of inventories. In addition, inventories are classified as current or long‑term based on our sales forecast and also, in part, based on our projected usage for warranty claims and service. A change in forecast could impact the classification of inventories.

·

We provide for the estimated cost of warranties at the time revenue from sales is recognized. We also accrue the estimated costs to address reliability repairs on products no longer under warranty when, in our judgment, and in accordance with a specific plan developed by us, it is prudent to provide such repairs. We estimate warranty expenses based upon historical and projected product failure rates, estimated costs of parts, labor and shipping to repair or replace a unit and the number of units covered under the warranty period. While we engage in extensive quality programs and processes, our warranty obligation is affected by failure rates and service costs in correcting failures. As we have more units commissioned and longer periods of actual performance, additional data becomes available to assess future warranty costs. When we have sufficient evidence that product changes are altering the historical failure occurrence rates, the impact of such changes is then taken into account in estimating future warranty liabilities. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period that new information, such as design changes, cost of repair and product enhancements, becomes available. Should actual failure rates or service costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the warranty liability would be required and could be material to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

·

Our revenue consists of sales of products, parts, accessories and service, which includes FPPs, net of discounts. Our distributors purchase products, parts and FPPs for sale to end users and are also required to provide a variety of additional services, including application engineering, installation, commissioning and post‑commissioning service. Our standard terms of sales to distributors and direct end users include transfer of title, care, custody and control at the point of shipment, payment terms ranging from full payment in advance of shipment to payment in 90 days, no right of return or exchange, and no post‑shipment performance obligations by us except for warranties provided on the products and parts sold. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or service has been rendered, selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Service revenue derived from time and materials contracts is recognized as the service is performed. FPP contracts are agreements to perform certain agreed‑upon service to maintain a product for a specified period of time. Service revenue derived from FPP contracts is recognized on a straight‑line basis over the contract period. We occasionally enter into agreements that contain multiple elements, such as equipment, installation, engineering and/or service. Effective January 1, 2018, we launched our DSS program to fund additional support for distributor business development activities, customer lead generation, brand awareness and tailored marketing services for each of our major geography and market vertical. Service revenue derived from our DSS program began in March 2018 and is recognized on a pro rata basis as the distributors purchase our products.

·

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and typically non‑interest bearing. We maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments and other accounts receivable allowances. We evaluate all accounts aged over 60 days past payment terms. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates or if other conditions arise that

53

Table of Contents

result in an impairment of their ability or intention to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

·

We have a history of unprofitable operations. These losses generated significant federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards. We record a valuation allowance against the net deferred income tax assets associated with these NOLs if it is “more likely than not” that we will not be able to utilize them to offset future income taxes. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the timing of realizing the benefits of our favorable tax attributes in future income tax returns, a valuation allowance has been provided against all of our net deferred income tax assets. We currently provide for income taxes only to the extent that we expect to pay cash taxes, primarily foreign and state taxes. It is possible, however, that we could be profitable in the future at levels which could cause management to determine that it is more likely than not

42


Table of Contents

that we will realize all or a portion of the NOL carryforwards. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the amount of net deferred tax assets that are expected to be realized. Such adjustment would increase income in the period that the determination was made.

·

We recognize stock‑based compensation expense associated with stock options in the statement of operations. Determining the amount of stock‑based compensation to be recorded requires us to develop estimates to be used in calculating the grant‑date fair value of stock options. We calculate the grant‑date fair values using the Black‑Scholes valuation model.

The use of Black‑Scholes model requires us to make estimates of the following assumptions:

·

Expected volatility—The estimated stock price volatility was derived based upon our actual historic stock prices over the expected option life, which represents our best estimate of expected volatility.

·

Expected option life—The expected life, or term, of options granted was derived from historical exercise behavior and represents the period of time that stock option awards are expected to be outstanding.

·

Risk‑free interest rate—We used the yield on zero‑coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected life assumption as the risk‑free interest rate.

The amount of stock‑based compensation cost is recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting and established an accounting policy election to assume zero forfeiture for awards and account for forfeitures when they occur.

54

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Year Ended March 31, 20172020 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 20162019

The following table summarizes our revenue by geographic markets (amounts in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

2017

2016

 

 

2020

2019

 

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

United States and Canada

 

$

33.7

 

$

36.9

 

 

$

32.2

 

$

46.3

 

Europe and Russia

 

22.9

 

16.3

 

 

16.5

 

16.1

 

Latin America

 

8.6

 

15.0

 

 

9.1

 

9.6

 

Asia and Australia

 

10.0

 

16.3

 

 

8.6

 

9.1

 

Middle East and Africa

 

 

2.0

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

2.3

 

Total

 

$

77.2

 

$

85.2

 

 

$

68.9

 

$

83.4

 

Revenue Revenue for Fiscal 20172020 decreased $8.0$14.5 million, or 9%17%, to $77.2$68.9 million from $85.2$83.4 million for Fiscal 2016.2019. The change in revenue for Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 included decreases in revenue of $6.4 million from the Latin American market, $6.3 million from the Asian and Australian markets and $3.2$14.1 million from the United States and Canadian markets, $0.5 million from the Latin American markets, and $0.5 million from the Asian and Australian markets. These overall decreases in revenue were offset by increases in revenue of $6.6$0.4 million from the European and Russian markets and $1.3$0.2 million from the Middle East and African markets. The decrease in revenue in the Latin American marketUnited States and Canadian markets during Fiscal 20172020 compared to the same period the previous year was primarily because of decreases in product shipments into the result of a strong U.S. dollarnatural resources and reduced capitalenergy efficiency vertical markets, as well as lower accessories and operational spending, particularlyparts revenue. These decreases were primarily in the upstreamUnited States and midstream sectors ofwere due to weakness in the oil and gas markets.market as a result of a decline in oil prices, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected the timing of customer demand for our products. The decrease in revenue in the Latin American market was primarily because of a decrease in C1000 Signature Series systems shipments into the natural resources market during Fiscal 2020 compared to the same period last year. The decrease in revenue in the Asian and Australian markets was primarily the resultbecause of large non-recurring microturbinedecreases in product shipments for specific projects that had occurred during Fiscal 2016. The decrease in revenue ininto the United Statesenergy efficiency and Canadiannatural resources vertical markets during Fiscal 20172020 compared to the same period the previous year was primarily the result of the continued volatility in the global oil and gas market.last year.  The increase

43


Table of Contents

in revenue in the European and Russian markets during Fiscal 20172020 compared to the same period the previouslast year was primarily because of our strategic initiativethe European energy efficiency and natural resources vertical markets continue to improve the diversification of our revenue, the improvement of sales from BPC and additional revenue from new distributors in the Russian market.improve. The increase in revenue in the Middle East and African markets was primarily because of increases in accessories and parts revenue during Fiscal 20172020 compared to the same period in the previous year was primarily the result of our continued investment in key growth initiatives in those markets. Despite the increase in revenue in the Russian, Middle East and African markets, our revenue continues to be negatively impacted by the volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar (making our products more expensive overseas) and ongoing geopolitical tensions in Russia, North Africa and the Middle East.last year.

The following table summarizes our revenue (revenue amounts in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

    

Revenue

    

Megawatts

    

Units

    

Revenue

    

Megawatts

    

Units

 

    

Revenue

    

Megawatts

    

Units

    

Revenue

    

Megawatts

    

Units

 

Microturbine Product

 

$

48.3

 

49.3

 

269

 

$

58.4

 

60.0

 

281

 

 

$

33.8

 

33.2

 

214

 

$

51.4

 

51.0

 

270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accessories and Parts

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

 

 

Service

 

 

13.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.1

 

 

 

 

 

Total Accessories, Parts and Service

 

 

28.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.0

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

77.2

 

 

 

 

 

$

85.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

68.9

 

 

 

 

 

$

83.4

 

 

 

 

 

For Fiscal 2017,2020, revenue from microturbine products decreased $10.1$17.6 million, or 17%34%, to $48.3$33.8 million from $58.4$51.4 million for Fiscal 2016. Megawatts shipped during Fiscal 2017 decreased 10.7 megawatts, or 18%, to 49.3 megawatts from 60.0 megawatts during Fiscal 2016.2019. The decrease in revenue and megawatts shipped was becauseprimarily the result of delays of certain oil and gas projects, globally, resulting from the continued volatilityweakness in the oil and gas market.market due to a decline in oil prices, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected the timing of customer demand for our products compared to the same period last year. Megawatts shipped during Fiscal 2020 decreased 17.8 megawatts, or 35%, to 33.2 megawatts from 51.0 megawatts during Fiscal 2019. Average revenue per megawatt shipped was approximately $1.0 million in both Fiscal 2020 and 2019. The timing of shipments is subject to change based on several

55

Table of Contents

variables (including customer deposits, payments, availability of credit and delivery schedule changes), most of which are not within our control and can affect the timing of our revenue. Average revenue per megawatt shipped was approximately $1.0 million during each of Fiscal 2017 and 2016. 

For Fiscal 2017,2020, revenue from our accessories and parts increased $0.3decreased $0.5 million, or 2%3%, to $15.0$14.4 million from $14.7$14.9 million for Fiscal 2016.2019. The increasedecrease in revenue from accessories and parts was primarily because of an increaselower accessories and parts shipments as a result of the COVID-19 shutdowns and movement restrictions in sales of accessories. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we shipped tenall of our new roof mounted integrated CHP heat recovery modules designed for our C1000 Signature Series systems, which added approximately $0.4 million of new accessories revenue.global markets.

Service revenue for Fiscal 20172020 increased $1.8$3.6 million, or 15%21%, to $13.9$20.7 million from $12.1$17.1 million for Fiscal 2016.2019. The increase in service revenue was primarily the result of our growing installed base and an increasedue to increases in our energy efficiency customers purchasingrevenue from our FPP service agreements.agreements and microturbine rental program. FPP service revenue increased primarily because in Fiscal 2019 we did not recognize revenue on certain service contracts because of the reassignment of those service contracts from Capstone’s legacy California distributor to Cal Microturbine (“CAL”), one of our domestic distributors. Earned revenue from our DSS program for Fiscal 2020 and 2019 was $1.7 million in each year and is included under the caption “Service revenue” in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Sales to E-Finity, Distributed Generation, LLC (“E-Finity), one of our domestic distributors, accounted for 14%12% and 11%13% of our revenue for the years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016. Sales to Horizon Power Systems (“Horizon”), one of our domestic distributors, accounted for 11% and 15% of our revenue for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016,2019, respectively. Sales to Dtc Soluciones Inmobiliarias S.A. de C.V. (“DTC”), one of our Mexican distributors,CAL accounted for 10%12% of our revenue for the year ended March 31, 2016. Sales to Optimal Group Australia Pty Ltd (“Optimal”), one of our Australian distributors, accounted for 10% of our revenue for the year ended March 31, 2016.2019.

Gross Margin  Cost of goods sold includes direct material costs, production and service center labor and overhead, inventory charges and provision for estimated product warranty expenses. The grossGross margin was $1.8approximately $9.0 million, or 2%13% of revenue, for Fiscal 20172020, compared to a gross margin of $12.8$9.5 million, or 15%11% of revenue, for Fiscal 2016.2019. The decrease in gross margin of $11.0$0.5 million during Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 was primarily because of incremental warranty expensea $4.4 million decrease in our direct material costs margin and higher inventory charges of $6.9 million, lower volume of microturbines shipped and a shift in product mix of $6.0$0.2 million, offset by decreases in warranty expense of $1.6 million, royalty expense of $0.2 million, and lower production and service center labor and overhead expense of $0.9 million, inventory charges of $0.7 million and royalty expense of $0.3$2.3 million. In addition to consolidating our manufacturing processes into our Van Nuys location, managementManagement continues to implement initiatives to improve gross margin in Fiscal 20182021 by further reducing

44


Table of Contents

manufacturing overhead and fixed and direct material costs, and improving product performance as we work to achieve profitability.

Warranty expense is a combinationDirect material costs margin, calculated as total revenue less our direct material costs, decreased $4.4 million during Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019 primarily because of a standard warranty provision recorded at$4.4 million decrease in product direct material costs margin due to lower volume and a decrease of approximately $1.1 million in FPP direct material cost margin primarily due to higher than normal levels of unscheduled maintenance activities as a result of a supplier defect identified during the time revenue is recognizedfirst quarter of Fiscal 2019, which were partially offset by $1.1 million of rental, DSS, parts and changes, if any, in estimates for reliability repair programs. Reliability repair programs are based upon estimates that are recorded in the period that new information becomes available, including design changes, cost of repair and product enhancements, which can include both in-warranty and out-of-warranty systems. accessories direct material costs margin.

The increasedecrease in warranty expense of $6.9$1.6 million during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 was primarily because of a one-time non-cashlower standard warranty provision to retrofit proactively select non-Signature Series C200 microturbines withas a result of the more robust new Signature Series generator components to improve product performance, reliability and customer satisfaction. In addition,supplier defect identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019, which did not materially impact Fiscal 2020 warranty expense during Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016 reflects accommodations and timingas most affected units were out of claims in the current period and the result of a benefit in the same period last year related to the decrease in the number of units covered under warranty.warranty period. Management expects the warranty expense in Fiscal 20182021 to be lower than in line with Fiscal 2017 primarily as a result of a decrease in reliability repair programs.2020.

Production and service center labor and overhead expense decreased $0.9$2.3 million during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 2016 as a result2019 primarily because of decreases of approximately $0.7 million in salaries expense, of $1.0$0.7 million overhead allocated to finished goods inventory, $0.4 million in freight expense, $0.4 million in supplies expense, $0.2 million in consulting expense, and $0.2 million of business travelproduct certification expense, and $0.1 million of consulting expense. These decreases were primarily the result of our cost reduction program to lower labor and overhead expenses throughout the organization. These decreases were offset by an increase in manufacturing suppliesof $0.3 million of depreciation expense.

Royalty expense of $0.4decreased $0.2 million during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 primarily because of the closeout of purchasing agreements resulting from changes in product configuration and engineering changes.we concluded our royalty obligation with Carrier.

Inventory charges decreased $0.7increased $0.2 million during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 primarily as the result of a decrease in the provision for excess and obsolete inventory. During Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, we made an allowance

56

Table of approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for slow-moving inventory in relation to our TA100 product line.Contents

Royalty expense decreased $0.3 million during Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016 primarily as a result of lower sales of our C1000 Series systems.

The following table summarizes our gross margin (in millions except percentages):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Gross Margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product

 

$

(6.9)

 

$

5.6

 

 

$

(0.6)

 

$

0.2

 

As a percentage of product revenue

 

 

-14

%

 

10

%

 

(2)

%

 

 —

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accessories, parts and service

 

$

8.7

 

$

7.2

 

 

$

9.6

 

$

9.3

 

As a percentage of accessories, parts and service revenue

 

 

30

%

 

27

%

 

27

%

 

29

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Gross Margin

 

$

1.8

 

$

12.8

 

 

$

9.0

 

$

9.5

 

As a percentage of total revenue

 

 

2

%

 

15

%

 

13

%

 

11

%

ProductThe decrease in product gross margin decreased to a negative 14% during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 was primarily because of a one-time non-cash warranty provision, a decrease in volume of product shipments due to weakness in the oil and a shiftgas market from decline in product mix.oil prices, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected the timing of customer demand for our products compared to the same period last year. Accessories, parts and service gross margin increased to 30% during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019 primarily because of our growing installed base,due to an increase in energy efficiency customers purchasing our FPPhigh margin rental revenue, as well as lower revenue and higher costs in Fiscal 2019 associated with the reassignment of certain service agreements and timingcontracts from Capstone’s legacy California distributor to Cal Mircoturbine, partially offset by higher maintenance activities in Fiscal 2020 as a result of FPP services performed.a supplier defect identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019.

Research and Development Expenses (“R&D”)  R&D expenses for Fiscal 2017 decreased $4.8 million, or 47%, to $5.4 million from $10.2 million for Fiscal 2016. The overall decrease in R&D expenses of approximately $4.8 million resulted from decreases in salaries expense of approximately $2.5 million, supplies expense of $1.7 million, consulting expense of $0.7 million2020 and business travel expense of $0.12019 were each $3.6 million. These overall decreases were offset by a

45


Table of Contents

reduction in cost-sharing benefits of $0.2 million. As part of our initiatives to reduce operating expenses and achieve profitability, during Fiscal 2016, we reduced the number of active research projects, which included the development of the C250 microturbine. Management expects R&D expenses in Fiscal 20182021 to be lower than in Fiscal 20172020 as a result of the continued cost reduction initiatives.lower costs from our COVID-19 Business Continuity Plan.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses  SG&A expenses for Fiscal 2017 decreased $6.42020 increased $1.2 million, or 24%6%, to $20.7$22.2 million from $27.1$21.0 million for Fiscal 2016.2019. The net decreaseincrease in SG&A expenses was comprised of increases of approximately $0.5 million in marketing expense, $0.2 million in legal expense and $0.1 million in shareholder costs. In addition, the increase in SG&A expense resulted from higher bad debt expense of $0.8 million during Fiscal 2020 compared to the same period last year. These increases were offset by decreases of approximately $3.5$0.1 million in salaries expense $0.9 million in marketing expense, $0.8 million in professional services expense, including accounting expenses, $0.5and $0.3 million in business travel expense, $0.5 million in facilities expense and $0.4 million in consulting expense. These overall decreases were offset by an increase in supplies expense of $0.2 million. These decreases were primarily the result of our cost reduction program to lower operating expenses throughout the organization. Excluding bad debt recovery, managementManagement expects SG&A expenses in Fiscal 20182021 to be lower than in Fiscal 20172020 primarily as a result of lower costs from our continued initiatives to reduce operating expenses and achieve profitability.COVID-19 Business Continuity Plan.

Interest Expense  Interest expense decreased $0.1increased $3.7 million or 17%, to $0.5$5.2 million during Fiscal 20172020 from $0.6$1.5 million for Fiscal 2016.2019. Interest expense is primarily from the average balancesincreased because of higher debt outstanding under our former credit facility with Wells Fargo.and a higher interest rate. As of March 31, 2017,2020, we had total debt of $11.5$30.0 million outstanding underoutstanding. On February 4, 2019, we entered into a $30.0 million three-year term note with Goldman Sachs to replace the existing $15.0 million revolving credit facility.facility with Bridge Bank. See Liquidity and Capital Resources— Three-year Term Note below for additional discussion on our three-year term note with Goldman Sachs.

Income Tax Provision Income tax expense decreased $1,000,increased $4,000, or 5%50%, to $19,000$12,000 during Fiscal 20172020 from $20,000$8,000 during Fiscal 2016.2019. Income tax expense incurred was related to state and foreign taxes. The effective income tax rate of −0.1%-0.1% differs from the federal and state blended statutory rate of approximately 35%23.5% primarily as a result of recording taxable losses.maintaining a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets. At March 31, 2017,2020, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $678$643.7 million and $160.2$162.0 million, respectively, which may be utilized to reduce future taxable income, subject to limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. We provided a valuation allowance for 100% of our net deferred tax asset of $269.3$169.8 million at March 31, 20172020 because the realization of the benefits of these favorable tax attributes in future income tax returns is not deemed more likely than not. Similarly, at March 31, 2016,2019, the net deferred tax asset was fully reserved.

4657


Table of Contents

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial information. This information was prepared in accordance with GAAP, and, in the opinion of management, contains all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such quarterly information when read in conjunction with the financial statements included elsewhere herein. Our operating results for any prior quarters may not necessarily indicate the results for any future periods.

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2017

 

Year Ended March 31, 2016

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2020

 

Year Ended March 31, 2019

 

 

Fourth

 

Third

 

Second

 

First

 

Fourth

 

Third

 

Second

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

Third

 

Second

 

First

 

Fourth

 

Third

 

Second

 

First

 

(Unaudited)

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

 

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

    

Quarter

 

Revenue

    

$

22,921

    

$

20,185

    

$

14,998

    

$

19,065

    

$

18,867

    

$

21,459

    

$

17,905

    

$

26,980

 

    

$

11,560

    

$

17,383

    

$

20,740

    

$

19,244

    

$

22,019

    

$

18,030

    

$

22,174

    

$

21,189

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

20,802

 

 

24,184

 

 

14,328

 

 

16,066

 

 

16,764

 

 

17,408

 

 

15,977

 

 

22,295

 

 

 

11,102

 

 

14,755

 

 

17,659

 

 

16,379

 

 

18,665

 

 

15,790

 

 

20,137

 

 

19,367

 

Gross margin

 

 

2,119

 

 

(3,999)

 

 

670

 

 

2,999

 

 

2,103

 

 

4,051

 

 

1,928

 

 

4,685

 

 

 

458

 

 

2,628

 

 

3,081

 

 

2,865

 

 

3,354

 

 

2,240

 

 

2,037

 

 

1,822

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R&D

 

 

1,135

 

 

1,282

 

 

1,350

 

 

1,621

 

 

1,959

 

 

2,905

 

 

2,872

 

 

2,416

 

 

 

838

 

 

972

 

 

900

 

 

938

 

 

887

 

 

891

 

 

891

 

 

932

 

SG&A

 

 

5,021

 

 

4,848

 

 

5,036

 

 

5,746

 

 

5,310

 

 

7,002

 

 

6,705

 

 

8,089

 

 

 

5,195

 

 

5,280

 

 

5,499

 

 

6,237

 

 

5,424

 

 

4,574

 

 

5,308

 

 

5,651

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(4,037)

 

 

(10,129)

 

 

(5,716)

 

 

(4,368)

 

 

(5,166)

 

 

(5,856)

 

 

(7,649)

 

 

(5,820)

 

 

 

(5,575)

 

 

(3,624)

 

 

(3,318)

 

 

(4,310)

 

 

(2,957)

 

 

(3,225)

 

 

(4,162)

 

 

(4,761)

 

Net loss(1)

 

$

(4,631)

 

$

(8,909)

 

$

(5,865)

 

$

(4,516)

 

$

(5,319)

 

$

(6,015)

 

$

(7,882)

 

$

(5,975)

 

 

$

(6,950)

 

$

(4,907)

 

$

(4,448)

 

$

(5,593)

 

$

(3,954)

 

$

(3,450)

 

$

(4,357)

 

$

(4,897)

 

Net loss per common share—basic (1)

 

$

(0.13)

 

$

(0.26)

 

$

(0.19)

 

$

(0.17)

 

$

(0.25)

 

$

(0.34)

 

$

(0.48)

 

$

(0.36)

 

Net loss per common share—diluted (1)

 

$

(0.13)

 

$

(0.28)

 

$

(0.19)

 

$

(0.17)

 

$

(0.25)

 

$

(0.34)

 

$

(0.48)

 

$

(0.36)

 

Net loss per common share—basic and diluted (1)

 

$

(0.74)

 

$

(0.59)

 

$

(0.59)

 

$

(0.77)

 

$

(0.55)

 

$

(0.50)

 

$

(0.67)

 

$

(0.79)

 


(1)

Loss per-share amounts for each of the three months ended June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015,all periods has been retroactively adjusted to reflect our 1-for-20the Company’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split, which was effective November 6, 2015.October 21, 2019.

During the three months ended December 31, 2018, we received approximately $0.4 million under the Assignment Agreement with TI and it has been recorded as recovery of bad debts and included under SG&A. There was no payment received under the Amended Assignment Agreement with TI during the three months ended March 31, 2017, we recorded approximately $0.2 million in bad debt recovery with respect to the collection of cash for receivables from BPC previously reserved during Fiscal 2015.2019. During the three months ended March 31, 20172020 we made an allowance ofreserved approximately $0.5 million in cost of goods sold for slow-moving inventory in relation to our TA100 product line.

Duringcertain past due distributors because collections were uncertain given the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded approximately $1.4 million in bad debt recovery in SG&A with respect to the collection of cash for receivables from EMI previously reserved during Fiscal 2015. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 we made an allowance of approximately $0.7 million in cost of goods sold for slow-moving inventory in relation to our TA100 product line.COVID-19 pandemic business environment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash requirements depend on many factors, including the execution of our plan. We expect to continue to devote substantial capital resources to running our business and implementing the strategic changes summarized herein. Our planned capital expenditures for the year ending March 31, 20182021 include approximately $1.0$2.5 million for rental units and plant and equipment costs related to manufacturing and operations. We have invested our cash in institutional funds that invest in high quality short‑term money market instruments to provide liquidity for operations and for capital preservation.

Our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balances increased $3.0decreased $14.6 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, compared to a decreasean increase of $15.5$10.3 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2019. The overall improvementdecrease in cash, usedcash equivalents and restricted cash during Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 2016the increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash during the same period last year was primarily related to the result$30.0 million three-year term note with Goldman Sachs entered into during the fourth quarter of proceeds fromFiscal 2019 to replace the issuance of common stock and warrants and underwritten public offeringsexisting $15.0 million revolving credit facility with Bridge Bank as described below. Under the three-year term note with Goldman Sachs we are not permitted to allow our cash and cash equivalents to be less than $12.0 million through the first anniversary date of February 4, 2020, and $9.0 million thereafter.

On April 15, 2020, we applied for an unsecured loan in the principal amount of $2,610,200 under the PPP loan (the “PPP Loan”). On March 23, 2020 the Company enacted a Business Continuity Plan in response to COVID-19. Beginning March 30, 2020, the Company furloughed approximately 52 employees, leaving behind only staff deemed

4758


Table of Contents

essential for day-to-day administrative operations for a minimum period of 45 days. The Company’s Leadership Team volunteered to take a 25% temporary salary cut as well as the fiscal 2020 Executive Bonus in equity in lieu of cash if earned. In addition, approximately 25 other top company managers volunteered to take a similar 15% reduction in salary and the directors voted to take a temporary 25% reduction in base cash retainer.  We believe these programs will supplement our current and future available capital resources.

Operating Activities During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, we used $18.5$19.7 million in cash in our operating activities, which consisted of a net loss for the period of $23.9$21.9 million and cash used for working capital of $3.4$4.0 million, offset by non‑cash adjustments (primarily warranty provision, accounts receivable allowances, depreciation and amortization, stock based compensation and inventory provision) of $8.8$6.2 million. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016,2019, we used $22.5$17.7 million in cash in our operating activities, which consisted of a net loss for the period of $25.2$16.7 million and cash used for working capital of $2.4$6.1 million, offset by non‑cash adjustments of $5.1 million.

The following is a summary of the significant sources (uses) of cash from operating activities (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Net loss

    

$

(23,921)

    

$

(25,191)

 

    

$

(21,898)

    

$

(16,659)

 

Non-cash operating activities(1)

 

 

8,828

 

 

5,092

 

 

 

6,160

 

 

5,115

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(1,903)

 

 

1,021

 

 

 

(449)

 

 

91

 

Inventories

 

 

1,491

 

 

5,161

 

 

 

(1,499)

 

 

(5,850)

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

1,405

 

 

(8,317)

 

 

 

(2,567)

 

 

3,048

 

Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets

 

 

1,215

 

 

(3,813)

 

Other changes in operating assets and liabilities

 

 

(4,446)

 

 

(234)

 

 

 

(660)

 

 

365

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(18,546)

 

$

(22,468)

 

 

$

(19,698)

 

$

(17,703)

 


(1)

Represents warranty provision, change in fair value of warrant liability, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, inventory provision and accounts receivable allowances.

The change in non-cash operating activities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 compared to the same period the previous fiscal year was primarily because of the provision for warranty expenses during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 as a result of a supplier defect identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. Additionally, contributing to the change was the amortization of debt issuance costs from the Goldman Sachs term note payable during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.  The change in accounts receivable during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was primarily the result of a warranty provision to retrofit proactively select non-Signature Series C200 microturbines with the more robust new Signature Series generator components to improve product performance, reliability and customer satisfaction. In addition, non-cash operating activities includes the change in fair value of warrant liability for certain warrants issued in our October 2016 Offering (defined below) of common stock and warrants. The change in accounts receivable was the result of lower revenue in Fiscal 2020 and slowerdelayed collection of accounts receivable during thefrom certain customers, compared to fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 compared to the year ended March 31, 2016.2019. The change in inventory was primarily the result of a decrease in raw materials andpartially offset by an increase in finished goods during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 compared to an increase in raw materials partially offset by a decrease in finished goods during the same period the previous year.fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The change in accounts payable and accrued expenses was primarily the result of the level of inventory receipts and timing of payments made by us during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 compared to the same period the previous fiscal year. The change in prepaid expenses, other current assets and other liabilities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was primarily because of a negotiated royalty settlement to Carrier and a supplier prepayment obligation in Fiscal 2019, each described below, and a marketing demonstration unit accounted for as a deferred marketing cost in Fiscal 2020. The change in other operating assets and liabilities was primarily because of warranty payments forduring the proactive retrofit of certain non-Signature Series C200 microturbines during thefiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 compared to thefiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2019, was primarily the result of an increase in deferred revenue attributable to FPP contracts.

Investing Activities  Net cash used in investing activities of $0.2$4.2 million and $1.5$3.4 million during the yearsfiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 and 20162019, respectively, relates primarily to the acquisition of fixed assets.assets, rental units and leasehold improvements made to our Van Nuys location. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, we deployed approximately $3.2 million and $2.8 million of our C1000 Signature Series systems under our factory rental program, respectively.

59

Table of Contents

Financing Activities During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, we generated approximately $21.7$9.2 million in cash from financing activities compared to cash generated during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162019 of approximately $8.5$31.4 million. The funds generated from financing activities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 were primarily the result of proceeds from the October 2016 Offering of common stock and warrants described below, the April 2016 Offering (defined below),September 2019 registered direct offering and proceeds from the credit facility, offset by repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations.at-the-market offering program described below. The funds generated from financing activities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162019 were primarily the result of net proceeds from our three-year term note with Goldman Sachs and the at-the-market offering program, each described below, offset by net repayments under the credit facility and the repayment of notes payable and capital lease obligations.

On October 18, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to sell 3,600,000 shares of common stock, pre-funded Series B warrants to purchase up to 2,700,000 shares of common stock (“the October 2016 Offering”), and Series A warrants to purchase up to 6,300,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to a placement agent agreement, dated as of October 18, 2016, we engaged

48


Table of Contents

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as the lead placement agent for the offering and ROTH Capital Partners, LLC as co-placement agent for the offering. Each share of common stock was sold at a price of $1.20. Each Series B warrant was issued with an exercise price of $1.20 per share of common stock, $1.19 of which was pre-funded at closing and $0.01 of which is payable upon exercise. Each Series A warrant was issued with an initial exercise price of $1.34 per share of common stock. These Series A warrants contain anti-dilution provisions that reduce the exercise price of the warrants if certain dilutive issuances occur. The anti-dilution provisions of the Series A warrants are subject to approval by our stockholders. The Series A warrants are classified as liabilities under the caption “Warrant liability” in the accompanying balance sheets and recorded at estimated fair value with the corresponding charge under the caption “Change in fair value of warrant liability” in the accompanying statements of operations. See Part I, Item 1, Note 10—Fair Value Measurements for disclosure regarding the fair value of financial instruments. The net proceeds to us from this offering, after deducting the placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses, were approximately $6.8 million. The offering closed on October 21, 2016. 

On April 19, 2016, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as the sole book-running manager, and Rodman & Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, as the co-manager, related to public offering of 2.7 million shares of our common stock and pre-funded Series B warrants to purchase up to 5.5 million shares of common stock, which were offered in lieu of common stock to those purchasers whose purchase of common stock in the offering otherwise would result in the purchaser beneficially owning more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock following the completion of the offering (the “April 2016 Offering”). Also included in the offering were Series A warrants to purchase 4.1 million shares of common stock. Every two shares of common stock were sold with one Series A warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a collective negotiated price of $3.50. Every two Series B warrants were sold with one Series A warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a collective negotiated price of $3.48. The net proceeds to us from the sale of the common stock and warrants, after deducting fees and other offering expenses, were approximately $13.1 million. The offering closed on April 22, 2016.At-the-market offerings

Effective August 28, 2015, we entered into a sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC with respect to an at-the-market offering program pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time at itsour sole discretion, shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0 million. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, we issued 0.3 million shares of our common stock under the at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to us from the sale of our common stock were approximately $4.0 million after deducting commissions paid of approximately $0.1 million. As of March 31, 2019, 2.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock were cumulatively sold pursuant to the at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the common stock were approximately $28.6 million after deducting commissions paid of approximately $0.8 million. This at-the-market offering program expired on May 29, 2018.  

On June 7, 2018, we entered into a sales agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC with respect to an at-the-market offering program pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $25.0 million. We will set the parameters for sales of the shares, including the number to be sold, the time period during which sales are requested to be made, any limitation on the number that may be sold in one trading day and any minimum price below which sales may not be made. During the three monthsfiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, we issued 0.41.7 million shares of our common stock under thethis at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to us from the sale of our common stock were approximately $0.3$5.3 million after deducting commissions paid of approximately $8,800. As of March 31, 2017, 7.3 million shares of our common stock were sold pursuant to the at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to us from the sale of the common stock were approximately $12.8 million after deducting commissions paid of approximately $0.4$0.2 million. As of March 31, 2017,2020, approximately $12.2 million remained available for issuance with respect to thethis at-the-market offering program.

Warrants

On April 13, 2018, a warrant holder exercised its rights under the warrant agreement to exercise on a cashless basis 576,000 Series A warrants at an exercise price of $6.00 per share under the warrant agreement. In accordance with terms of the warrant agreement, after taking into account the shares withheld to satisfy the cashless exercise option, the Company issued 380,625 shares of common stock.

As of March 31, 2020, there were 271,875 Series A warrants outstanding and there are no Series B warrants outstanding. Of the total Series A warrants outstanding, 217,875 Series A warrants were issued with an exercise price of $25.50 per share of common stock, and have an expiration date of October 25, 2021, and 54,000 Series A warrants with anti-dilution provisions were issued with an initial exercise price of $13.40 per share of common stock, and have an expiration date of April 22, 2021. As of March 31, 2020, because of the anti-dilution provisions, these warrants had an adjusted exercise price of $1.15 per share of common stock.

On February 4, 2019, we sold to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (the “Holder”), a Purchase Warrant for Common Shares (the “Warrant”) pursuant to which the Holder may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Shares”) in an aggregate amount of up 404,634 shares (the “Warrant Shares”). The Warrant was sold to the Holder at a purchase price of $150,000, in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. The Warrant may be exercised by the Holder at any time after August 4, 2019 at an exercise price equal to $8.86 and will expire on February 4, 2024. The Warrant contains standard adjustment provisions in the event of additional stock issuances below the exercise price of the warrant, stock splits, combinations, rights offerings and similar transactions. The value of the Warrant was $2.3 million upon issuance, and has been classified as an equity instrument in additional paid in capital in our consolidated balance sheets. Our common stock and warrant transactions during Fiscal 2020 triggered certain anti-dilution provisions in the warrants outstanding, resulting in an additional 49,891 warrants issued, which were treated as a deemed dividend in the amount of $87,362.

60

Table of Contents

On December 9, 2019, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Purchase Warrant for Common shares (the “Amendment No. 1”) with Special Situations Investing Group II, LLC (as successor in interest to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC) (the “Warrant Holder”) that amends the Warrant. The Amendment No. 1 amends the first paragraph of the Warrant to increase the number of Warrant Shares issuable under the Warrant (on a post-reverse split basis) and to decrease the exercise price from $8.86 per share (on a post-reverse split basis) to $3.80 per share (the “Per Share Warrant Exercise Price”). The Amendment No. 1 also amends Section 2.1 of the Warrant such that the Per Share Anti-Dilution Price is equal to the Per Share Warrant Exercise Price.

On September 4, 2019, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional and accredited investors pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering (the “Registered Direct Offering”) an aggregate of 580,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share at a negotiated purchase price of $5.00 per share, and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 440,000 shares of our common stock at a negotiated purchase price of $5.00 per Pre-Funded Warrant, for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $5.1 million (580,000 shares of our common stock plus 440,000 pre-funded warrants at a $5.00 per share purchase price), before deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. Net proceeds from the offering were $4.6 million. The offering closed on September 9, 2019. On October 24, 2019, a warrant holder exercised its rights to the warrant agreement to exercise on a cash basis 440,000 pre-funded warrants at an exercise price of $0.001 per share under the warrant agreement.

In a concurrent private placement, we agreed to issue to the purchasers warrants to purchase 765,000 shares of Common Stock, which represent 75% of the number of shares of Common Stock and shares underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants purchased in the Registered Direct Offering, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement. The Common Warrants will be exercisable for shares of Common Stock at an initial exercise price of $6.12 per share for a period of five years, starting on April 2, 2020 and expiring on April 2, 2025. None of these warrants have been exercised as of the date of this report.

There were no stock options exercised during the years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Employee stock purchases, net of repurchases of shares of our common stock for employee taxes due on vesting of restricted stock units, resulted in approximately $16,000$0.1 million of net cash used during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, compared with $0.1 million of net cash used during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2019.

Former Credit Facility  We maintained two Credit Agreements,Upon closing with Wells Fargo, which providedthe Purchaser and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc., our existing credit facilities with Bridge Bank were paid off in full.

Three-year Term Note  On February 4, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), by and among us, with a linecertain subsidiaries of credit of up to $20.0 million in the aggregate (the “Credit Agreements”). The twelfth amendment to the Credit Agreements provided us the right, under certain circumstances, to increase the borrowing capacity available under our revolving lines of credit to an aggregate maximum of $20.0 million from an aggregate maximum of $15.0 million (the “Accordion Feature”). In addition, Wells Fargo provided us with a non-revolving capital expenditure line of credit up to $0.5 million to acquire additional eligible equipment for use in our business. Effective as of June 30, 2015, we exercised the Accordion Feature, thereby increasing the maximum borrowing capacity available to a maximum of $20.0 million. The amount actually available to us variedguarantors, Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc. and any other purchasers party thereto from time to time depending on, among other factors,(collectively, the “Purchaser”) and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc., as collateral agent, in connection with the sale of senior secured notes of us in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. Under the Note Purchase Agreement, we sold to the Purchaser $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of our eligible inventorysenior secured notes (the “Notes”), which bear interest at a rate of 13.0% per annum, computed on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months, and accounts receivable. As security forpayable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year until maturity. The first interest payment on the payment and performanceNotes will be on March 31, 2019. The entire principal amount of the credit facility, we grantedNotes is due and payable on February 4, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”). The Notes do not amortize and the entire principal balance is due in a security interest in favor of Wells Fargo in substantially all of our assets.single payment on the Maturity Date. As of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, $11.5 million and $9.52019, $30.0 million in borrowings were outstanding respectively, under the credit facility.three-year term note. Under the three-year term note with Goldman Sachs we are not permitted to allow our cash and cash equivalents to be less than $12.0 million through the first anniversary date of February 4, 2020, and $9.0 million thereafter. On December 9, 2019, we entered into a Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Note Purchase Agreement. Under the Second Amendment, Section 6.21 of the Note Purchase Agreement was amended to increase the Section 382 Ownership Shift threshold to not exceed 40.0%. In addition to the Note Purchase Agreement, on February 4, 2019, the Company sold the Warrant pursuant to which the Holder may purchase shares of the Company’s Common Shares. The Warrant was sold to the Holder at a purchase price of $150,000, in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. The Warrant may be exercised by the Holder at any time after August 4, 2019 at an exercise price equal to $8.86 and will expire on February 4, 2024. The Warrant contains standard adjustment provisions in the event of

4961


Table of Contents

The Credit Agreements included affirmative covenants as well as negative covenants that prohibit a variety of actions without Wells Fargo’s consent, including covenants that limit our ability to (a) incur or guarantee debt, (b) create liens, (c) enter into any merger, recapitalization or similar transaction or purchase all or substantially alladditional stock issuances below the exercise price of the assets orwarrant, stock splits, combinations, rights offerings and similar transactions. The value of another entity, (d) pay dividends on, or purchase, acquire, redeem or retire shares of,the Warrant was $2.3 million, and has been classified as an equity instrument in additional paid in capital in our capitalconsolidated balance sheets. Our common stock (e) sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, (f) change our accounting method or (g) enter into a different line of business. Furthermore,and warrant transactions during Fiscal 2020 triggered certain anti-dilution provisions in the Credit Agreements contained financial covenants, including (i) a requirement not to exceed specified levels of losses, (ii) a requirement to maintain a substantial minimum monthly cash balance towarrants outstanding, line of credit advances based upon our financial performance, and (iii) limitations on our annual capital expenditures.

Several times since entering into the Credit Agreements weresulting in an additional 49,891 warrants issued, which were not in compliance with certain covenants under the credit facility. In connection with each event of noncompliance, Wells Fargo waived the event of default and, on several occasions, we amended the Credit Agreements in response to the default and waiver.  On June 10, 2015, we received from Wells Fargo a waiver of one such event of noncompliance, andtreated as a condition of the amended Credit Agreements, we had restricted $5.0 million of cash equivalents as additional security for the credit facility. If we had not obtained the waivers and amended the Credit Agreements, we would not have been able to draw additional funds under the credit facility. In addition, we pledged our accounts receivables, inventories, equipment, patents and other assets as collateral for our Credit Agreements, which would be subject to seizure by Wells Fargo if we weredeemed dividend in default under the Credit Agreements and unable to repay the indebtedness. Wells Fargo also had the option to terminate the Credit Agreements or accelerate the indebtedness during a period of noncompliance. On February 7, 2017, we and Wells Fargo entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreements regarding the release of restricted cash and the exclusion of certain items from the financial covenant calculations. As of March 31, 2017, we were in compliance with the covenants contained in the amended Credit Agreements for Fiscal 2017. Upon closing with Bridge Bank, our existing credit facilities with Wells Fargo were paid off in full.

New Credit Facility  On June 2, 2017, we entered into two secured credit facilities (the “Bridge Bank Credit Agreements”) with Western Alliance Bank through its Bridge Bank division (“Bridge Bank”), with credit support provided by the Export-Import Bank of the United States through its working capital guarantee program.  Under the terms of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, we may borrow up to $12.0 million on a revolving basis depending on, among other factors, the amount of our eligible inventory and accounts receivable.$87,362. On December 9, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 with the Warrant Holder that amends the Warrant. The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements are for a two-year period ending June 2, 2019.

Total borrowings, letterAmendment No. 1 amends the first paragraph of credit obligations and the then aggregate committed amountWarrant to increase the number of cash management servicesWarrant Shares issuable under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements may not exceed 85%Warrant (on a post-reverse split basis) and to decrease the exercise price from $8.86 per share (on a post-reverse split basis) to the Per Share Warrant Exercise Price. The Amendment No. 1 also amends Section 2.1 of the sum of unrestricted cash andWarrant such that the amount of cash collateral held at Bridge Bank. As a condition ofPer Share Anti-Dilution Price is equal to the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, we have restricted $5.0 million of cash equivalents as additional security for the credit facility. Borrowings under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements will bear per annum interest at the prime rate plus 1.5 percent, subject to increase during the occurrence of an event of default. Obligations under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements are secured by all of our assets, including intellectual property and general intangibles.

The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements include affirmative covenants as well as negative covenants that prohibit a variety of actions without Bridge Bank’s consent, including covenants that limit our ability to (a) incur or guarantee debt, (b) create liens, (c) enter into any merger, recapitalization or similar transaction or purchase all or substantially all of the assets or stock of another entity, or (d) sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of our assets. 

The financial covenants  of the domestic credit agreement with Bridge Bank (the “Domestic Facility”) requires us not to exceed specified levels of losses relative to our financial model and the outstanding line of credit advances may not exceed 85% of  the sum of unrestricted cash and the amount of cash collateral held at Bridge Bank. The Domestic Facility also defines an event of default to include a material adverse effect on our business. An event of default for this or any other reason, if not waived, could have a material adverse effect on us.Per Share Warrant Exercise Price.

Working Capital Cash used in working capital was $3.4$4.0 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, an increase2020, a decrease of $1.0$2.2 million from the $2.4$6.2 million cash used during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2019. We attribute the increasedecrease in our working capital requirements primarily becauseto changes in inventory, as well as the negotiated royalty settlement agreement payment to Carrier and prepayments to one of higher warranty payments and accounts receivable,our single source suppliers during Fiscal 2019 with no such transactions during Fiscal 2020. These decreases in working capital requirements were offset by decreasesa decrease in

50


Table of Contents

inventory and accounts payable due to the timing of payments made by us. Additionally, we didn’t fully achieveto our planned number of product shipments during the year ended March 31, 2017, resulting in lower than expected revenue primarily in the oil and gas markets.

Based on our current operating plan, we anticipates that, given current working capital levels, current financial projections, the ability to borrow under our credit facility with Bridge Bank and the funds raised by selling additional securities through the at-the-market offering as of the date of issuance of our Fiscal 2017 financial statements. We believe we will be able to meet our financial obligations as they become due over the next twelve months from the date of issuance of our Fiscal 2017 financial statements. We believe we will be able to meet our financial obligations as they become due over the next twelve months from the date of issuance of our Fiscal 2017 financial statements.vendors.

Evaluation of Ability to Maintain Current Level of OperationsIn connection with preparing the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, management evaluated whether there were conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raised substantial doubt about our ability to meet our obligations as they became due for the next twelve months from the date of issuance of our Fiscal 20172020 financial statements. Management assessed that there were such conditions and events, including a history of recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from operating activities, the continued negative impact by the volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar (makingin certain markets making our products more expensive overseas)in such markets, the COVID-19 pandemic, and ongoing global geopolitical tensions in Russia, North Africa and Middle East. Our working capital requirements during Fiscal 2017 were higher than planned, primarily as a result of warranty claims related to the proactive retrofit for non-Signature Series C200 microturbines. Additionally, we did not fully achieve our planned number of product shipments during Fiscal 2017, resulting in lower than expected revenue.tensions. We incurred a net loss of $23.9$21.9 million and used cash in operating activities of $18.5$19.7 million for Fiscal 2017. In addition, atduring the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020. Our working capital requirements during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 were higher than management’s expectations due to a higher level of finished goods in inventory due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected the timing of customer demand for our products, as well as cash used for accounts payable due to timing of payments. Our net loss expanded during the year ended March 31, 2020 primarily because of a decrease in product volume and higher FPP scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities primarily as a result of a supplier defect identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. Additionally, operating expenses were higher in Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019 primarily due to the recording of a bad debt reserve for certain past due receivables because of uncertain collectability due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Fiscal 2020 and we received approximately $0.4 million under the Assignment Agreement with TI in Fiscal 2019. As of March 31, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $19.7$15.1 million, and outstanding borrowings under our credit facilitydebt of $11.5$30.0 million.

Management evaluated these conditions in relation to our ability to meet our obligations as they become due. Our ability to continue current operations and to execute on management’s plan is dependent on our ability to generate cash flows from operations. Management believes that we will continue to make progress on our path to profitability by continuing to lower our operating costs and to develop our geographical and vertical markets. We may seek to raise funds by selling additional securities (through the at-the-market offering or otherwise) to the public or to selected investors or by obtaining additional debt financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funds on commercially favorable terms or at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the fully diluted ownership percentages of existing stockholders will be reduced. In addition, any equity or debt securities that we would issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock.

Based on our current operating plan, management anticipates that, given current working capital levels, current financial projections, the ability to borrow under our new credit facilityterm note payable with Goldman Sachs and the funds raised by selling additional securities through the at-the-market offering as of the date of issuance of our Fiscal 20172020 financial statements, we will be able to meet our financial obligations as they become due over the next twelve months from the date of issuance of itsour Fiscal 20172020 financial statements.

62

Table of Contents

Depending on the timing of our future sales and collection of related receivables, managing inventory costs and the timing of inventory purchases and deliveries required to fulfill the backlog, our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now planned. The amount of capital that we will need in the future will require us to achieve significantly increased sales volume which is dependent on many factors, including:

·

the market acceptance of our products and services;

·

our business, product and capital expenditure plans;

·

capital improvements to new and existing facilities;

·

our competitors’ response to our products and services;

51


Table of Contents

·

our relationships with customers, distributors, dealers and project resellers; and

·

our customers’ ability to afford and/or finance our products.

Our accounts receivable balance, net of allowances, was $17.0 million and $13.6$16.2 million as of March 31, 20172020 and March 31, 2016,2019, respectively. Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable, (“DSO”), increased by two days to 6885 days as of March 31, 20172020 compared to 6670 days as of March 31, 2016.2019 due to delayed collections in all markets due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the weakening oil and gas markets. We recorded net bad debt expense of approximately $0.4 million and net bad debt recovery of approximately $1.5$0.3 million, for each of the years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016. During Fiscal 2015, we recorded approximately $7.1 million and $2.6 million with respect to the accounts receivable allowances from BPC and EMI,2019, respectively.

No assurances can be given that future bad debt expense will not increase above current operating levels. Increased bad debt expense or delays in collecting accounts receivable could have a material adverse effect on cash flows and results of operations. In addition, our ability to access the capital markets may be severely restricted or made very expensive at a time when we need, or would like, to do so, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial resources. Certain industries in which our customers do business and certain geographic areas have been and could continue to be adversely affected by the currentpreviously referenced economic environment.and geopolitical considerations.

Paycheck Protection Program Loan  On April 15, 2020, we applied for an unsecured loan in the principal amount of $2,610,200 under the PPP loan. The PPP was established under the recently congressionally approved CARES Act and is administered by the SBA. On April 24, 2020, we entered into a promissory note with Western Alliance Bank. The Company received the full amount of the Loan on April 24, 2020. In accordance with the requirements of the CARES Act, we intend to use proceeds from the PPP Loan to support fixed costs such as payroll costs, rent and utilities. On May 13, 2020, the Company repaid $660,200 of the loan in accordance with the Fourth Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement between the Company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. 

The advance under the Loan bears interest at a rate per annum of 1%. The PPP Loan matures on April 24, 2022.

Forgiveness of this loan is only available for principal that is used for the limited purposes that qualify for forgiveness. While we intend to pursue the forgiveness of the PPP Loan received in accordance with the requirements and limitations under the CARES Act, no assurance can be provided that forgiveness of any portion of the PPP Loan will be obtained.

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any material off‑balance sheet arrangements.

Inflation

Inflation did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. In an effort to offset the adverse impact of inflation on earnings, we have historically raised selling prices on all products, parts, accessories and services. However, any future adverse impact of inflation on our raw materials and energy costs may not be similarly recoverable through our selling price increases.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”), which amends guidance and presentation related to restricted cash in the statement of cash flows, including stating that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included within cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. We adopted ASU 2016-18 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and retrospectively applied ASU 2016-18 as required.

Prior to the adopting ASU No. 2016-18, our consolidated statements of cash flows reported changes in restricted cash as financing activities and excluded restricted cash from the beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents. The effect on prior periods of adopting the new guidance includes: (i) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balance as of March 31, 2016 to $16.7 million and (ii) increase of $5.0 million in cash flows used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported on the consolidated balance sheets that sum to amounts reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

14,191

 

$

11,704

 

Restricted cash

 

 

5,514

 

 

5,002

 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

$

19,705

 

$

16,706

 

5263


Table of Contents

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based PaymentImpact of Recently Issued Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 changes certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments to employees and involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Specifically, ASU 2016-09 requires that all income tax effects of share-based awards be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the reporting period in which they occur. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 amends existing guidance to allow forfeitures of share-based awards to be recognized as they occur. Previous guidance required that share-based compensation expense include an estimate of forfeitures. We have elected to early adopt ASU 2016-09 as of April 1, 2016 and made a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur.  As of March 31, 2016, the Company had $11.2 million of unrealized excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 the Company recognized these tax benefits as a credit to retained earnings and a debit to the deferred tax asset. See Note 8—Income Taxes for further discussion on changes as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09. Other than these reclassifications, the effect of excess tax benefits on the provision for income taxes, and the adjustment to retained earnings, we do not believe the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will materially impact our consolidated financial position and results of operations.Standards

Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), (“ASU 2016-02”). The purpose of ASU 2016-02 is to provide financial statement users a better understanding of the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result in the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most operating leases. New disclosure requirements include qualitative and quantitative information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842), which provides additional implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with lease terms greater than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the guidance is effective with the option to elect certain practical expedients. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluatingadopted ASU 2016-02 on April 1, 2019. See Note 13—Leases for additional discussion of the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.2016-02.

In July 2015,June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory2018-07, “Shared-Based Payment Arrangements with Nonemployees” (Topic 505), (“ASU 2015-11”2018-07”). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory that is recorded using2018-07 simplifies the first-in, first-out methodaccounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services. Under ASU 2018-07, most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees will be measured ataligned with the lowerrequirements for share-based payments granted to employees. Under the ASU 2018-07, the measurement of cost or net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 isequity-classified nonemployee share-based payments will be fixed on the grant date, as defined in ASC 718, and will use the term nonemployee vesting period, rather than requisite service period. The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We do not believe that the provisions of ASU 2015-11 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). The ASU was issued as part of FASB’s current plan to simplify overly complex standards. This ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. The update requires retrospective application to all prior period amounts presented. This update is effective for annual and2018, including interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015, with early applicationwithin those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted forif financial statements that have not yet been issued. We adopted ASU 2015-03 with no2018-07 on April 1, 2019 and it did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial positionstatements.

On August 17, 2018, the SEC issued Release No. 33-10532, “Disclosure Update and Simplification”, (“Release No. 33-10532”) which amends certain redundant, duplicative, outdated, superseded or resultsoverlapping disclosure requirements. The amendments in this rule are intended to facilitate the disclosure of operations.

In August 2014,information to investors and to simplify compliance without significantly impacting the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosuremix of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Abilityinformation provided to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires management to performinvestors. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements regarding the analysis of stockholders’ equity for interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements, are issued and provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. Certain disclosureswhich entities will be required to present a reconciliation for each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is required to be filed. The final rule became effective on November 5, 2018, however the SEC announced that it would not object if conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The amendmentsfiler’s first presentation of the changes in ASU 2014-15 are effectivestockholders’ equity were included in its Form 10-Q for the annual period endingquarter that begins after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. We adopted ASU 2014-15 with no impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Revenue Recognition Related ASUs:

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”).

53


Table of Contents

ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

In August 2015, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2014-09”), which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, using one of two retrospective application methods. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.

In March 2016, the FASB issued FASB ASUamendments. We adopted Release No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance33-10532 on principal versus agent considerations.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations1, 2019 and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”). ASU 2016-10 clarifies the implementation guidance for identifying performance obligations and determining when to recognize revenue on licensing agreements for intellectual property.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition and Derivatives and Hedging: Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (“ASU 2016-11”). ASU 2016-11 rescinds certain SEC staff comments previously made in regard to these ASU’s.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”) that provide guidance on assessing collectability, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration, and completed contracts and contract modifications at transition.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to ASU 2014-09. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affect narrow aspects of the guidance in ASU 2014-09, which isit did not yet effective. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 address loan guarantee fees, impairment testing of contract costs, provisions for losses on construction-type and production-type contracts, and various disclosures.

We are evaluating our existing revenue recognition policies and thehave a material impact of ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016- 10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20, if any, on our financial position and results of operations. Thedisclosures.

Not yet adopted

Other standards issued but not yet effective, date and transition requirements forwhich are not discussed, are not considered material to the amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2014-09. We will be required to adopt the revenue recognition standard in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (fiscal year ending March 31, 2019) and interim periods within those annual periods.Company.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this Item.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Our Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule included in this Form 10‑K beginning at page F‑1 are incorporated in this Item 8 by reference.

64

Table of Contents

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

54


Table of Contents

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

In connection with the preparation of this Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a‑15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 20172020 to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports we submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms prescribed by the SEC. Additionally, such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a‑15(f) or 15d‑15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:

·

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

·

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

·

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017.2020.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

5565


Table of Contents

Item 9B.  Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors

The information required by this Item will be included in the Company’s 20172020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“20172020 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

The information required regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance will be included in the Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation.

The information required by this Item will be included in the Company’s 20172020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this Item will be included in the Company’s 20172020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this Item will be included in the Company’s 20172020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Firm Fees and Services.

The information required by this Item will be included in the Company’s 20172020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

5666


Table of Contents

 

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)  1. and 2. Financial statements and financial statement schedule

The financial statements, notes and financial statement schedule are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F‑1 of this Report.

3. Exhibits

The exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-K are set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately followingpreceding the signatures of this Form 10-K. The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary.

Not applicable.

 

 

 

5767


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

    

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsFirm 

 

F-2

Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 

 

F-4F-3

For the years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations 

 

F-5F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity 

 

F-6F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 

 

F-7F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

 

F-8F-7

 

Financial statement schedules not included in this Form 10‑K have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

F-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholdersof

of Capstone Turbine Corporation Inc.:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Capstone Turbine Corporation (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the year then ended.  two years in the period ended March 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).  In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidatedthe Company's financial statements based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has retrospectively changed its method of reporting cash flows during the year ended March 31, 2017 due to the adoption of FASB ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Capstone Turbine Corporation, as of March 31, 2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP

We have also auditedserved as the adjustment to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016 to retrospectively apply the change in the method of reporting cash flows, as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, such adjustment is appropriate and has been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016 other than with respect to the adjustment and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016 taken as a whole.Company’s auditor since 2017.

(signed) Marcum LLP

Irvine,

Costa Mesa, California

June 13, 201726, 2020

F-2


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Capstone Turbine Corporation:

We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in note 2, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Capstone Turbine Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. The 2016 financial statements before the effects of the adjustments discussed in note 2 are not presented herein. The 2016 consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2016 financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in note 2, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Capstone Turbine Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2016, and the results of  their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in accounting described in note 2 and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by a successor auditor.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California

June 9, 2016

F-3


CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

    

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

    

March 31,

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

14,191

 

$

11,704

 

 

$

15,068

 

$

29,727

 

Restricted cash

 

 

5,514

 

 

5,002

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $6,845 at March 31, 2017 and $8,909 at March 31, 2016

 

 

17,003

 

 

13,575

 

Inventories

 

 

14,538

 

 

16,126

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $703 at March 31, 2020 and $5,298 at March 31, 2019

 

 

16,240

 

 

16,222

 

Inventories, net

 

 

21,460

 

 

20,343

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

3,073

 

 

2,636

 

 

 

3,987

 

 

3,818

 

Total current assets

 

 

54,319

 

 

49,043

 

 

 

56,755

 

 

70,110

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

2,115

 

 

3,537

 

Property, plant, equipment and rental assets, net

 

 

7,749

 

 

5,291

 

Non-current portion of inventories

 

 

961

 

 

2,143

 

 

 

1,221

 

 

1,403

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

651

 

 

941

 

 

 

 —

 

 

187

 

Other assets

 

 

225

 

 

228

 

 

 

8,230

 

 

2,972

 

Total assets

 

$

58,271

 

$

55,892

 

 

$

73,955

 

$

79,963

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

14,719

 

$

13,187

 

 

$

15,000

 

$

16,638

 

Accrued salaries and wages

 

 

1,819

 

 

1,880

 

 

 

1,644

 

 

1,637

 

Accrued warranty reserve

 

 

3,766

 

 

1,639

 

 

 

1,934

 

 

2,614

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

5,050

 

 

4,368

 

 

 

7,898

 

 

7,167

 

Revolving credit facility

 

 

11,533

 

 

9,459

 

Current portion of notes payable and capital lease obligations

 

 

302

 

 

361

 

Warrant liability

 

 

2,917

 

 

 —

 

Current portion of notes payable and lease obligations

 

 

477

 

 

31

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

40,106

 

 

30,894

 

 

 

26,953

 

 

28,087

 

Long-term portion of notes payable and capital lease obligations

 

 

26

 

 

74

 

Deferred revenue - non-current

 

 

944

 

 

1,069

 

Term note payable, net

 

 

27,963

 

 

27,099

 

Long-term portion of notes payable and lease obligations

 

 

5,074

 

 

212

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

158

 

 

184

 

 

 

 —

 

 

342

 

Total liabilities

 

 

40,290

 

 

31,152

 

 

 

60,934

 

 

56,809

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.001 par value; 515,000,000 shares authorized, 38,920,174 shares issued and 38,803,630 shares outstanding at March 31, 2017; 23,857,516 shares issued and 23,753,873 shares outstanding at March 31, 2016

 

 

39

 

 

24

 

Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Common stock, $.001 par value; 51,500,000 shares authorized, 10,286,366 shares issued and 10,228,789 shares outstanding at March 31, 2020; 7,216,910 shares issued and 7,190,671 shares outstanding at March 31, 2019

 

 

10

 

 

 7

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

870,457

 

 

853,288

 

 

 

915,755

 

 

903,803

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(850,876)

 

 

(826,955)

 

 

 

(900,869)

 

 

(878,884)

 

Treasury stock, at cost; 116,544 shares at March 31, 2017 and 103,643 shares at March 31, 2016

 

 

(1,639)

 

 

(1,617)

 

Treasury stock, at cost; 57,577 shares at March 31, 2020 and 26,239 shares at March 31, 2019

 

 

(1,875)

 

 

(1,772)

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

17,981

 

 

24,740

 

 

 

13,021

 

 

23,154

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

58,271

 

$

55,892

 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

$

73,955

 

$

79,963

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product, accessories and parts

 

$

48,143

    

$

66,303

 

Service

 

 

20,783

 

 

17,109

 

Total revenue

 

 

68,926

 

 

83,412

 

Cost of goods sold:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product, accessories and parts

 

 

42,273

 

 

60,149

 

Service

 

 

17,622

 

 

13,811

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

59,895

 

 

73,960

 

Gross margin

 

 

9,031

 

 

9,452

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

3,649

 

 

3,600

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

22,211

 

 

20,958

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

25,860

 

 

24,558

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(16,829)

 

 

(15,106)

 

Other income (expense)

 

 

133

 

 

(43)

 

Interest income

 

 

 8

 

 

 —

 

Interest expense

 

 

(5,198)

 

 

(1,502)

 

Loss before provision for income taxes

 

 

(21,886)

 

 

(16,651)

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

12

 

 

 8

 

Net loss

 

 

(21,898)

 

 

(16,659)

 

Less: Deemed dividend on purchase warrant for common shares

 

 

87

 

 

 —

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(21,985)

 

$

(16,659)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders—basic and diluted

 

$

(2.70)

 

$

(2.49)

 

Weighted average shares used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders

 

 

8,150

 

 

6,700

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSSTOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2017

    

2016

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product, accessories and parts

 

$

63,325

    

$

73,116

 

Service

 

 

13,844

 

 

12,095

 

Total revenue

 

 

77,169

 

 

85,211

 

Cost of goods sold:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product, accessories and parts

 

 

64,453

 

 

61,866

 

Service

 

 

10,927

 

 

10,578

 

Total cost of goods sold

 

 

75,380

 

 

72,444

 

Gross margin

 

 

1,789

 

 

12,767

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

5,388

 

 

10,152

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

20,651

 

 

27,106

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

26,039

 

 

37,258

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(24,250)

 

 

(24,491)

 

Other expense

 

 

(470)

 

 

(40)

 

Interest income

 

 

31

 

 

 —

 

Interest expense

 

 

(536)

 

 

(640)

 

Change in fair value of warrant liability

 

 

1,323

 

 

 —

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(23,902)

 

 

(25,171)

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

19

 

 

20

 

Net loss

 

$

(23,921)

 

$

(25,191)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share—basic and diluted

 

$

(0.75)

 

$

(1.39)

 

Weighted average shares used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per common share

 

 

32,074

 

 

18,162

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Treasury Stock

 

Stockholders’

 

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Capital

    

Deficit

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Equity

Balance, March 31, 2018

 

5,726,011

 

$

 5

 

$

889,650

 

$

(862,225)

 

14,596

 

$

(1,658)

 

$

25,772

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

11,643

 

 

(114)

 

 

(114)

Vested restricted stock awards

 

29,700

 

 

 —

 

 

113

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

113

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

907

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

907

Exercise of employee stock purchases

 

102

 

 

 —

 

 

 1

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 1

Stock awards to Board of Directors

 

45,719

 

 

 —

 

 

(70)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(70)

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

1,034,757

 

 

 1

 

 

10,934

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,935

Warrants exercised

 

380,621

 

 

 1

 

 

(4)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3)

Warrants issued

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,272

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,272

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(16,659)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(16,659)

Balance, March 31, 2019

 

7,216,910

 

$

 7

 

$

903,803

 

$

(878,884)

 

26,239

 

$

(1,772)

 

$

23,154

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

31,338

 

 

(103)

 

 

(103)

Vested restricted stock awards

 

73,983

 

 

 —

 

 

102

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

102

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

913

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

913

Exercise of employee stock purchases

 

522

 

 

 —

 

 

 3

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 3

Stock awards to Board of Directors

 

26,315

 

 

 —

 

 

(24)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(24)

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

2,528,636

 

 

 2

 

 

10,580

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,582

Warrants exercised

 

440,000

 

 

 1

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 1

Change in warrants valuation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

291

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

291

Deemed dividend on purchase warrant for common shares

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

87

 

 

(87)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(21,898)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(21,898)

Balance, March 31, 2020

 

10,286,366

 

$

10

 

$

915,755

 

$

(900,869)

 

57,577

 

$

(1,875)

 

$

13,021

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Treasury Stock

 

Stockholders’

 

 

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Capital

    

Deficit

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Equity

 

Balance, March 31, 2015

 

16,590,058

 

$

17

 

$

837,965

 

$

(801,764)

 

62,794

 

$

(1,514)

 

$

34,704

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

40,849

 

 

(103)

 

 

(103)

 

Vested restricted stock awards

 

250,735

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,406

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,406

 

Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases

 

5,658

 

 

 —

 

 

13

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13

 

Stock awards to Board of Directors

 

92,520

 

 

 —

 

 

164

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

164

 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

6,918,545

 

 

 7

 

 

12,740

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

12,747

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,191)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,191)

 

Balance, March 31, 2016

 

23,857,516

 

 

24

 

 

853,288

 

 

(826,955)

 

103,643

 

 

(1,617)

 

 

24,740

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

12,901

 

 

(22)

 

 

(22)

 

Vested restricted stock awards

 

96,111

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

706

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

706

 

Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases

 

10,063

 

 

 —

 

 

 9

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 9

 

Stock awards to Board of Directors

 

65,167

 

 

 —

 

 

104

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

104

 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

14,891,317

 

 

15

 

 

16,350

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

16,365

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(23,921)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(23,921)

 

Balance, March 31, 2017

 

38,920,174

 

$

39

 

$

870,457

 

$

(850,876)

 

116,544

 

$

(1,639)

 

$

17,981

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

2017

    

2016

 

 

2020

    

2019

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(23,921)

 

$

(25,191)

 

 

$

(21,898)

 

$

(16,659)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,577

 

 

1,746

 

 

 

1,616

 

 

1,261

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

173

 

 

172

 

Accounts receivable allowances

 

 

(1,525)

 

 

(1,459)

 

Amortization of financing costs and discounts

 

 

1,155

 

 

311

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

 

870

 

 

 —

 

Provision for (reduction in) accounts receivable allowances

 

 

431

 

 

(345)

 

Inventory provision

 

 

1,278

 

 

1,925

 

 

 

564

 

 

778

 

Provision for warranty expenses

 

 

7,052

 

 

111

 

 

 

594

 

 

2,200

 

Loss on disposal of equipment

 

 

365

 

 

27

 

(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment

 

 

17

 

 

 2

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

810

 

 

2,570

 

 

 

913

 

 

907

 

Change in fair value of warrant liability

 

 

(1,323)

 

 

 —

 

Warrant issuance expenses

 

 

421

 

 

 —

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(1,903)

 

 

1,021

 

 

 

(449)

 

 

91

 

Inventories

 

 

1,491

 

 

5,161

 

 

 

(1,499)

 

 

(5,850)

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(117)

 

 

314

 

Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets

 

 

1,215

 

 

(3,813)

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

1,405

 

 

(8,317)

 

 

 

(2,567)

 

 

3,049

 

Accrued salaries and wages and long term liabilities

 

 

(87)

 

 

(210)

 

 

 

 8

 

 

(6)

 

Accrued warranty reserve

 

 

(4,925)

 

 

(1,655)

 

 

 

(1,274)

 

 

(1,269)

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

683

 

 

1,317

 

 

 

606

 

 

1,640

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(18,546)

 

 

(22,468)

 

 

 

(19,698)

 

 

(17,703)

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenditures for property and equipment

 

 

(204)

 

 

(1,513)

 

Expenditures for property, equipment and rental assets

 

 

(4,207)

 

 

(3,360)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(204)

 

 

(1,513)

 

 

 

(4,207)

 

 

(3,360)

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from (repayments of) revolving credit facility

 

 

2,074

 

 

(3,494)

 

Repayment of notes payable and capital lease obligations

 

 

(497)

 

 

(697)

 

Repayment of revolving credit facility

 

 

 —

 

 

(8,527)

 

Net proceeds from term note payable

 

 

 —

 

 

29,262

 

Repayment of notes payable and lease obligations

 

 

(613)

 

 

(337)

 

Cash used in employee stock-based transactions

 

 

(16)

 

 

(91)

 

 

 

(100)

 

 

(114)

 

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants

 

 

20,188

 

 

12,748

 

 

 

9,959

 

 

11,098

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

21,749

 

 

8,466

 

 

 

9,246

 

 

31,382

 

Net increase (decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

 

 

2,999

 

 

(15,515)

 

 

 

(14,659)

 

 

10,319

 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Period

 

 

16,706

 

 

32,221

 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, End of Period

 

$

19,705

 

$

16,706

 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Year

 

 

29,727

 

 

19,408

 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, End of Year

 

$

15,068

 

$

29,727

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

363

 

$

473

 

 

$

3,603

 

$

453

 

Income taxes

 

$

24

 

$

24

 

 

$

17

 

$

 6

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property and equipment through accounts payable

 

$

45

 

$

28

 

 

$

72

 

$

 —

 

Renewal of insurance contracts which was financed by notes payable

 

$

503

 

$

477

 

Acquisition of property and equipment in consideration for the issuance of a note payable

 

$

 —

 

$

101

 

Issuance of common stock for services to be received

 

$

700

 

$

 —

 

Deemed dividend

 

$

87

 

$

 —

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

F-7F-6


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Description of the Company and Basis of Presentation

Capstone Turbine Corporation (the “Company”) develops, manufactures, markets and services microturbine technology solutions for use in stationary distributed power generation applications and distribution networks, including cogeneration (combined heat and power (“CHP”), integrated combined heat and power (“ICHP”), and combined cooling, heat and power (“CCHP”)), renewable energy, natural resources, and critical power supply. In addition, the Company’s microturbines can be used as battery charging generators for hybrid electric vehicle applications.The Company also remanufactures microturbine engines and provides aftermarket parts and services, which includes our Factory Protection Plan (“FPP”), Distributor Support System program (“DSS program”), and long-term microturbine rentals. The Company was organized in 1988 and has been commercially producing its microturbine generators since 1998.

This Annual Report on Form 10‑K (this “Form 10‑K”) refers to the Company’s fiscal years ended March 31 as its “Fiscal” years.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Capstone Turbine International, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary that was formed in June 2004, Capstone Turbine Singapore Pte., Ltd., its wholly owned subsidiary that was formed in February 2011, and Capstone Turbine Financial Services, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary that was formed in October 2015, after elimination of inter-company transactions. In connection with the Company’s strategic plan to reduceThe Company closed its operating expenses, the Company is in the process of dissolvingwholly owned subsidiary, Capstone Turbine Singapore Pte., Ltd.Ltd and the corporate structure related to this entity was dissolved in September 2018.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Cash Equivalents  The Company considers only those investments that are highly liquid and readily convertible to cash with original maturities of three months or less at date of purchase as cash equivalents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments  The carrying value of certain financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, revolving credit facility and notes payable approximate fair market value based on their short‑term nature. See Note 10—Fair Value Measurements, for disclosure regarding the fair value of other financial instruments.

Accounts Receivable  Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and are typically non‑interest bearing. The Company maintains allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments and other accounts receivable allowances. Changes in the accounts receivable allowances are as follows as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2015

 

$

11,041

 

Accounts receivable allowances

 

 

(1,459)

 

Deductions

 

 

(673)

 

Balance, March 31, 2016

 

 

8,909

 

Accounts receivable allowances

 

 

(1,525)

 

Deductions

 

 

(539)

 

Balance, March 31, 2017

 

$

6,845

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2018

 

$

5,744

 

Reductions charged to costs and expenses

 

 

(345)

 

Bad debt write-off

 

 

(101)

 

Balance, March 31, 2019

 

$

5,298

 

Additions charged to costs and expenses

 

 

431

 

Bad debt write-off

 

 

(5,026)

 

Balance, March 31, 2020

 

$

703

 

Inventories  The Company values inventories at the lower of cost (determined on a first in first out (“FIFO”) basis and lower of costbasis) or market.net realizable value. The composition of inventory is routinely evaluated to identify slow-moving, excess, obsolete or otherwise impaired inventories. Inventories identified as impaired are evaluated to determine if write-downs are required. Included in the assessment is a review for obsolescence as a result of engineering changes in the Company’s products. All inventories expected to be used in more than one year are classified as long-term. During Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, we recorded an allowance of approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for slow-moving inventory in relation to our TA100 product line.

F-8F-7


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Depreciation and Amortization  Depreciation and amortization are provided for using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from two to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method with the exception of the backlog of 100 kW microturbines (“TA100”) acquired from Calnetix Power Solutions, Inc. (“CPS”). Purchased backlog is amortized based on unit sales and presented as a component of cost of goods sold.method.

Long-Lived Assets  The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If the expected future cash flows from the use of such assets (undiscounted and without interest charges) are less than the carrying value, the Company may be required to record a write‑down, which is determined based on the difference between the carrying value of the assets and their estimated fair value. The Company performed an analysis as of March 31, 20172020 and 2016 and as a result, approximately $17,000 and $0.1 million of purchased TA100 backlogdetermined that no impairment was written off to align with management’s decision to limit the production of TA100 systems on a case-by-case basis for key customers. Intangible assets include a manufacturing license, trade name, technology, backlog and customer relationships.necessary. See Note 5—Intangible Assets.

Deferred Revenue  Deferred revenue consists of deferred product and service revenue and customer deposits. Deferred revenue will be recognized when earned in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. The Company has the right to retain all or part of customer deposits under certain conditions.

Revenue  On April 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new revenue standard ASU 2014-09 and applied it to all contracts using the modified retrospective method. The Company determined there was no change in applying the new revenue standard, therefore no adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit was needed.

The Company derives its revenues primarily from system sales, service contracts and professional services. Revenues are recognized when control of the systems and services is transferred to the Company’s customers in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to in exchange for those services.

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:

·

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

·

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

·

Determination of the transaction price

·

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

·

Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation

The Company recognizes revenue when performance obligations identified under the terms of contracts with its customers are satisfied, which generally occurs, for systems, upon the transfer of control in accordance with the contractual terms and conditions of the sale. The majority of the Company’s revenue consistsassociated with systems is recognized at a point in time when the system is shipped to the customer. Revenue from service contracts and post-shipment performance obligations is recognized when or as those obligations are satisfied. The Company primarily offers assurance-type standard warranties that do not represent separate performance obligations and will separately offer and price extended warranties that are separate performance obligations for which the associated revenue is recognized over-time based on the extended warranty period. The Company records amounts billed to customers for reimbursement of salesshipping and handling costs within revenue. Shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight after control over a system has transferred to a customer are accounted for as fulfillment costs and are included in cost of products, parts, accessoriesgoods sold. Sales taxes and service, which includes a comprehensiveother usage-based taxes are excluded from revenue.

Comprehensive Factory Protection Plan (“FPP”), net service contracts require payment at the beginning of discounts. Capstone’s distributors purchase products, parts and FPPs for sale to end usersthe contract period. Advance payments are not considered a significant financing component as they are typically received

F-8

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

less than one year before the related performance obligations are satisfied. These payments are treated as a contract liability and are also requiredclassified in deferred revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Once control transfers to provide a variety of additional services, including application engineering, installation, commissioning and post‑commissioning repair and maintenance service. The Company’s standard terms of sales to distributors and direct end‑users include transfer of title, care, custody and control at the point of shipment, payment terms ranging from full payment in advance of shipment to payment in 90 days, no right of return or exchange, and no post‑shipment performance obligations by Capstone except for warranties provided on the products and parts sold.

Revenue from the sale of products, parts and accessories is generally recognized and earned when all of the following criteria are satisfied: (a) persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists; (b) price is fixed or determinable; (c) collectability is reasonably assured; and (d) delivery has occurred. Delivery generally occurs when the titlecustomer and the risks and rewards of ownership have substantially transferred toCompany meets the customer. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria, have been met, if it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured,the deferred revenue will not be recognized until collectability is reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment. Management’s estimates regarding the collectability of a particular sale may impact the timing of actual revenue recognized each period.

Service performed by the Company has consisted primarily of time and materials based contracts. The time and materials contracts are usually related to out‑of‑warranty units. Service revenue derived from time and materials contracts is recognized asin the service is performed.Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company also provides maintenance service contractsdeferred revenue relating to customers of its existing installed base. The maintenance service contracts are agreements to perform certain services to maintain a product for a specified period of time. Service revenue derived fromthe annual maintenance service contracts is recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations on a straight‑straight line basis over the expected term of the contract.

Significant Judgments - Contracts with Multiple Performance Obligations

The Company enters into contracts with its customers that often include promises to transfer multiple products, parts, accessories, FPP and services. A performance obligation is a promise in a contract period.with a customer to transfer products or services that are distinct. Determining whether products and services are distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately or combined as one unit of accounting may require significant judgment.

Products, parts and accessories are distinct as such services are often sold separately. In determining whether FPP and service contracts are distinct, the Company considers the following factors for each FPP and services agreement: availability of the services from other vendors, the nature of the services, the timing of when the services contract was signed in comparison to the product delivery date and the contractual dependence of the product on the customer’s satisfaction with the professional services work. To date, the Company has concluded that all of the FPP and services contracts included in contracts with multiple performance obligations are distinct.

The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis. The SSP is the price at which the Company would sell a promised product or service separately to a customer. Judgment is required to determine the SSP for each distinct performance obligation.

The Company determines SSP by considering its overall pricing objectives and market conditions. Significant pricing practices taken into consideration include the Company’s discounting practices, the size and volume of the Company’s transactions, the customer demographic, the geographic area where systems and services are sold, price lists, its go-to-market strategy, historical sales and contract prices. The determination of SSP is made through consultation with and approval by the Company’s management, taking into consideration the go-to-market strategy. As the Company’s go-to-market strategies evolve, the Company may modify its pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to SSP.

In certain cases, the Company is able to establish SSP based on observable prices of products or services sold separately in comparable circumstances to similar customers. The Company uses a single amount to estimate SSP when it has observable prices.

If SSP is not directly observable, for example when pricing is highly variable, the Company uses a range of SSP. The Company determines the SSP range using information that may include market conditions or other observable inputs. The Company typically has more than one SSP for individual products and services due to the stratification of those products and services by customer size and geography.

Unsatisfied Performance Obligations

The Company has elected the practical expedient to disclose only the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected length greater than one year. The majority of the Company’s revenues resulted from sales of inventoried systems with short periods of manufacture and delivery and thus are excluded from this disclosure.

F-9

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

As of March 31, 2020, the FPP backlog was approximately $82.4 million, which represents the value of the contractual agreement for FPP services that has not been earned and extends through Fiscal 2035.

Practical Expedients

We apply a practical expedient to expense costs as incurred for costs to obtain a contract when the amortization period would have been one year or less. These costs are recorded within sales and marketing expenses.

Warranty  The Company provides for the estimated costs of warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold and geography of sale. The Company’s product warranties generally start from the delivery date and continue for up to twenty-four months. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty obligation include product failure rates, anticipated hours of product operations and costs of repair or replacement in correcting product failures. These factors are estimates that may change based on new information that becomes available each period. Similarly, the Company also accrues the estimated costs to address

F-9


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

reliability repairs on products no longer in warranty when, in the Company’s judgment, and in accordance with a specific plan developed by the Company, it is prudent to provide such repairs. The Company assesses the adequacy of recorded warranty liabilities quarterly and makes adjustments to the liability as necessary. When the Company has sufficient evidence that product changes are altering the historical failure occurrence rates, the impact of such changes is then taken into account in estimating future warranty liabilities.

Research and Development (“R&D”)  The Company accounts for grant distributions and development funding as offsets to R&D expenses and both are recorded as the related costs are incurred. There were no offsets to R&D during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. Total offset to R&D expenses was $0.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2020 and 2019.

Income Taxes  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the consolidated financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

ASC Topic 740-10, Income Taxes, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized. Income tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax potions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as interest and other expense, net in the statements of operations.

Contingencies  The Company records an estimated loss from a loss contingency when information available prior to issuance of its financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

Risk Concentrations  Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. At March 31, 2017,2020, the majority of our cash balances were held at financial institutions located in California. The accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to certain limits. Balances that exceed the insurance coverage aggregate to approximately $19.0$14.7 million as of March 31, 2017.2020. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality institutions. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains an allowance for potential credit losses.

F-10

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Sales to E‑Finity Distributed Generation, LLC (“E‑Finity), one of the Company’s domestic distributors, accounted for 14% and 11% of our revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Sales to Horizon Power Systems (“Horizon”Finity”), one of the Company’s domestic distributors, accounted for 11%,12% and 15%13% of ourthe Company’s revenue for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Sales to Dtc Soluciones Inmobiliarias S.A. de C.V.Cal Microturbine (“DTC”CAL”), one of the Company’s Mexican distributors, accounted for 10% of revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. Sales to Optimal Group Australia Pty Ltd (“Optimal”), one of the Company’s Australian distributors, accounted for 10% of revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. Additionally, E-Finity, DTC and Reliable Secure Power Systems, one of the Company’s domestic distributors, accounted for 12% of the Company’s revenue for the year ended March 31, 2019. Additionally, E-Finity accounted for 14% of net accounts receivable as of March 31, 2020. Reliable Secure Power Systems, (“RSP”), one of our domestic distributors and E-Finity, accounted for 29%, 12%14% and 10%, respectively, of net accounts receivable as of March 31, 2017. DTC, Optimal, RSP,2019.

On October 13, 2017, the Company entered into an Accounts Receivable Assignment Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) and Regale Energy Zrt,Promissory Note (the “Note”) with Turbine International, LLC (“TI”).  

Pursuant to the terms of the Assignment Agreement, the Company agreed to assign to TI the right, title and interest to receivables owed to the Company from BPC Engineering, its former Russian distributor (“BPC”), upon TI’s payment to the Company of $2.5 million in three payments by February 1, 2018. The Company received payments from TI of approximately $1.0 million under the Assignment Agreement during Fiscal 2018, which was recorded as bad debt recovery.

On October 13, 2017, the Company and Hispania Petroleum, S.A. (the “Guarantor”) entered into a Guaranty Agreement (the “Guaranty Agreement”) whereby the Guarantor guarantees TI’s obligations under the Agreement and Note. However, due to the Company’s Hungarianlimited business relationship with TI and the missed payments on the Assignment Agreement, the Company deferred recognition of the Assignment Agreement and Note until collectability is reasonably assured.

In connection with the terms of the Note, the Company granted TI the sole distribution rights for its products and services in the Russian oil and gas sector. As a result of this appointment, TI agreed to pay the Company $3.8 million over a three-year period in 35 equal monthly installments starting in August 2018.

On June 5, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the Assignment Agreement (the “Amended Assignment Agreement”) and the Note (the “Amended Note”) with TI. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Assignment Agreement, the right, title and interest to receivables owed to the Company from BPC was be contingent upon TI’s payment to the Company of the remaining approximately $1.5 million in five payments by September 20, 2019. Under the terms of the Amended Note, TI agreed to pay the Company $3.8 million over a three-year period in 13 equal quarterly installments starting on December 20, 2019. The payments of $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million, due March 20, 2019, June 20, 2019, and September 20, 2019, respectively, under the Amended Assignment Agreement, have not been received at the time of this filing. In September 2019, the Company sent TI a notice to cure default with a deadline of October 31, 2019. TI failed to cure the noticed default and the Company has since terminated TI’s distributor (“Regale”), accounted for 28%, 11%, 10% and 10%, respectively, of netagreement. As a result, the BPC accounts receivable asand related accounts receivable reserve of March 31, 2016.$4.8 million were written off.

The Company recorded net bad debt expense of $0.4 million and net bad debt recovery of approximately $1.5$0.3 million for each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016. During2019, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, the fiscal year endedCompany cumulatively collected approximately $1.8 million from BPC on their accounts receivable, which has been previously reserved. The Company cumulatively collected approximately $1.5 million from TI, under the terms of the Assignment Agreement and the Amended Assignment Agreement. The BPC accounts receivable and related accounts receivable reserve of $4.8 million were written off as of March 31, 2015, the Company recorded approximately $7.1 million and $2.6 million with respect to the accounts receivable allowances from BPC Engineering (“BPC”), one of the Company’s Russian distributors and Electro Mecanique Industries (“EMI”), one of the Company’s distributors in the Middle East and Africa, respectively.2020.

Certain components of the Company’s products are available from a limited number of suppliers. An interruption in supply could cause a delay in manufacturing, which would affect operating results adversely.

F-10


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Estimates and Assumptions  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that

F-11

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates include accounting for accounts receivable allowances, stock‑based compensation, inventory write‑downs, valuation of long‑lived assets including intangible assets with finite lives, product warranties, income taxes and other contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Net Loss Per Common Share  Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted‑average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is also computed without consideration to potentially dilutive instruments because the Company incurred losses which would make such instruments antidilutive. Outstanding stock options and restricted stock units at March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 were 0.3 million and 0.50.2 million, respectively. Outstanding restricted stock units at each of March 31, 2017 and 2016 were 0.3 million. As of March 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, the number of warrants excluded from diluted net loss per common share computations was approximately 10.4 million. As of March 31, 2016, the Company did not have any warrants outstanding.1.5 million and 0.7 million, respectively.

Stock‑Based Compensation  Options or stock awards are recorded at their estimated fair value at the measurement date. The Company recognizes compensation cost for options and stock awards that have a graded vesting schedule on a straight‑line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Leases  Effective April 1, 2019, the Company accounts for its leases under ASC 842, Leases. Under this guidance, arrangements meeting the definition of a lease are classified as operating or financing leases and are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as both a right of use asset and lease liability, calculated by discounting fixed lease payments over the lease term at the rate implicit in the lease or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Lease liabilities are increased by interest and reduced by payments each period, and the right of use asset is amortized over the lease term. For operating leases, interest on the lease liability and the amortization of the right of use asset result in straight-line rent expense over the lease term.

In calculating the right of use asset and lease liability, the Company elects to combine lease and non-lease components. The Company excludes short-term leases having initial terms of 12 months or less from the new guidance as an accounting policy election and recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company continues to account for leases in the prior period financial statements under ASC Topic 840.

Reverse Stock Split  At the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held on August 29, 2019, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio in the range of one-for-five (1:5) to one-for-ten (1:10). Pursuant to such authority granted by the stockholders, the Company’s board of directors approved a one-for-ten (1:10) reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the common stock and the filing of the Amendment. The certificate was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware, effective on October 21, 2019 and the Reverse Stock Split became effective as of that date as filed with the SEC under the Securities and Exchange Act. Accordingly, all references to numbers of common shares, including the number of common shares on an as-if-converted basis, per-share data and share prices and exercise prices in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive basis.

Evaluation of Ability to Maintain Current Level of Operations  In connection with preparing the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, management evaluated whether there were conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raised substantial doubt about the Company’sour ability to meet itsour obligations as they became due for the next twelve months from the date of issuance of itsour Fiscal 20172020 financial statements. Management assessed that there were such conditions and events, including a history of recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from operating activities, the continued negative impact caused by the volatility of the global oil and gas markets, a strong U.S. dollar (makingin certain markets making our products more expensive overseas)in such markets, the COVID-19 pandemic, and ongoing global geopolitical tensionstensions. We incurred a net loss of $21.9 million and used cash in Russia, North Africa andoperating activities of $19.7 million during the Middle East. The Company’sfiscal year ended March 31, 2020. Our working capital requirements during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017

F-12

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2020 were higher than planned,management’s expectations due to a higher level of finished goods in inventory due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected the timing of customer demand for our products, as well as cash used for accounts payable due to timing of payments. Our net loss expanded during the year ended March 31, 2020 primarily because of a decrease in product volume and higher FPP scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities primarily as a result of warranty claims relateda supplier defect identified during the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. Additionally, operating expenses were higher in Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019 primarily due to the proactive retrofitrecording of a bad debt reserve for non-Signature Series C200 microturbines. Additionally,certain past due receivables because of uncertain collectability due to the Company did not fully achieve its planned number of product shipments duringCOVID-19 pandemic in Fiscal 2020 whereas we received approximately $0.4 million under the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, resultingAssignment Agreement with TI in lower than expected revenue. The Company incurred a net loss of $23.9 million and used cash in operating activities of $18.5 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. In addition, asFiscal 2019. As of March 31, 2017, the Company2020, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $19.7$15.1 million, and outstanding borrowings under its credit facilitydebt of $11.5$30.0 million.

Management evaluated these conditions in relation to the Company’sour ability to meet itsour obligations as they become due. The Company’sOur ability to continue current operations and to execute on management’s plansmanagements plan is dependent on itsour ability to generate cash flows from operations. Management believes that the Companywe will continue to make progress on itsour path to profitability by continuing to lower itsour operating costs and to develop itsour geographical and vertical markets. The CompanyWe may seek to raise funds by selling additional securities (through the at-the-market offering or otherwise) to the public or to selected investors or by obtaining additional debt financing. There is no assurance that the Companywe will be able to obtain additional funds on commercially favorable terms or at all. If the Company raiseswe raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the fully diluted ownership percentages of existing stockholders will be reduced. In addition, any equity or debt securities that the Companywe would issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of itsour common stock.

On June 2, 2017, the Company, entered into two secured credit facilities (the “Bridge Bank Credit Agreements”) with Western Alliance Bank through its Bridge Bank division (“Bridge Bank”), with credit support provided by the Export-Import Bank of the United States through its working capital guarantee program. Under the terms of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, the Company may borrow up to $12.0 million on a revolving basis depending on, among other factors, the amount of its eligible inventory and accounts receivable. The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements are for a two-year period ending June 2, 2019. See Note 11—Revolving Credit Facility, for discussion of the

F-11


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

credit facilities with Bridge Bank.

The Company maintained two Credit and Security Agreements, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), which provided the Company with a credit facility up to $20.0 million in the aggregate. Upon closing with Bridge Bank the Company’s existing credit facilities with Wells Fargo, were paid off in full.

Based on the Company’sour current operating plan, management anticipates that, given current working capital levels, current financial projections,, the ability to borrow under its credit facilityterm note payable with Bridge BankGoldman Sachs and the funds raised by selling additional securities through the at-the-market offering as of the date of issuance of itsour Fiscal 20172020 financial statements,, the Company we will be able to meet itsour financial obligations as they become due over at least the next twelve months from the date of issuance of itsour Fiscal 20172020 financial statements.

 

Segment Reporting  The Company is considered to be a single reporting segment. The business activities of this reporting segment are the development, manufacture and sale of turbine generator sets and their related parts and service. Following is the geographic revenue information based on the primary operating location of the Company’s customers (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

United States

 

$

33,746

 

$

36,667

 

 

$

31,082

 

$

45,480

Mexico

 

 

2,777

 

 

11,598

 

 

 

2,361

 

 

5,005

All other North America

 

 

 —

 

 

318

 

 

 

1,145

 

 

791

Total North America

 

 

36,523

 

 

48,583

 

 

 

34,588

 

 

51,276

Russia

 

 

8,379

 

 

1,828

 

 

 

3,653

 

 

3,176

All other Europe

 

 

14,537

 

 

14,513

 

 

 

12,858

 

 

12,886

Total Europe

 

 

22,916

 

 

16,341

 

 

 

16,511

 

 

16,062

Asia

 

 

4,960

 

 

7,643

 

 

 

4,074

 

 

5,229

Australia

 

 

4,985

 

 

8,557

 

 

 

4,559

 

 

3,874

All other

 

 

7,785

 

 

4,087

 

 

 

9,194

 

 

6,971

Total Revenue

 

$

77,169

 

$

85,211

 

 

$

68,926

 

$

83,412

 

F-13

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s revenue by product (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

C30

 

$

2,608

 

$

1,815

 

 

$

1,518

 

$

1,810

C65

 

 

11,985

 

 

12,291

 

 

9,366

 

11,719

C200

 

 

1,878

 

 

3,884

 

 

3,880

 

5,218

C600

 

 

5,058

 

 

6,194

 

 

7,204

 

6,286

C800

 

 

4,615

 

 

8,058

 

 

3,253

 

5,846

C1000

 

 

21,537

 

 

25,877

 

 

8,340

 

20,538

Waste heat recovery generator

 

 

100

 

 

 —

 

Unit upgrades

 

 

512

 

 

281

 

 

 

229

 

 

 —

Total from Microturbine Products

 

 

48,293

 

 

58,400

 

Microturbine Products

 

$

33,790

 

$

51,417

Accessories and Parts

 

 

15,032

 

 

14,716

 

 

 

14,353

 

 

14,886

Total Product, Accessories and Parts

 

 

63,325

 

 

73,116

 

 

48,143

 

66,303

Service

 

 

13,844

 

 

12,095

 

 

 

20,783

 

 

17,109

Total Revenue

 

$

77,169

 

$

85,211

 

 

$

68,926

 

$

83,412

 

Substantially all of the Company’s operating assets are in the United States.

F-12


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements    In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”), which amends guidance and presentation related to restricted cash in the statement of cash flows, including stating that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included within cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and retrospectively applied ASU 2016-18 as required.

Prior to the adopting ASU No. 2016-18, the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows reported changes in restricted cash as financing activities and excluded restricted cash from the beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents. The effect on prior periods of adopting the new guidance includes: (i) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balance as of March 31, 2016 to $16.7 million and (ii) increase of $5.0 million in cash flows used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported on the consolidated balance sheets that sum to amounts reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

14,191

 

$

11,704

 

Restricted cash

 

 

5,514

 

 

5,002

 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

$

19,705

 

$

16,706

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 changes certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments to employees and involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Specifically, ASU 2016-09 requires that all income tax effects of share-based awards be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the reporting period in which they occur. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 amends existing guidance to allow forfeitures of share-based awards to be recognized as they occur. Previous guidance required that share-based compensation expense include an estimate of forfeitures. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2016-09 as of April 1, 2016 and made a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur.  As of March 31, 2016, the Company had $11.2 million of unrealized excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 the Company recognized these tax benefits as a credit to retained earnings and a debit to the deferred tax asset. See Note 8—Income Taxes for further discussion on changes as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09. Other than these reclassifications, the effect of excess tax benefits on the provision for income taxes, and the adjustment to retained earnings, the Company does not believe the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will materially impact its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), (“ASU 2016-02”). The purpose of ASU 2016-02 is to provide financial statement users a better understanding of the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result in the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most operating leases. New disclosure requirements include qualitative and quantitative information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842), which provides additional implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with lease terms greater than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the guidance is effective with the option to elect certain practical expedients. Early adoption is permitted. TheOn April 1, 2019, the Company is currently evaluatingadopted this standard. See Note 12—Leases for additional discussion of the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.2016-02.

In July 2015,June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory2018-07, “Share-Based Payment Arrangements with Nonemployees” (Topic 505), (“ASU 2015-11”2018-07”). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory that2018-07 simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services. Under ASU 2018-07, most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees will be aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. Under the ASU 2018-07, the measurement of equity-classified nonemployee share-based payments will be fixed on the grant date, as defined in ASC 718, and will use the term nonemployee vesting period, rather than requisite service period. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is recorded usingpermitted if financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 on April 1, 2019 and it did not have a material impact on the first-in, first-out methodCompany’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

On August 17, 2018, the SEC issued Release No. 33-10532, “Disclosure Update and Simplification”, (“Release No. 33-10532”) which amends certain redundant, duplicative, outdated, superseded or overlapping disclosure requirements. The amendments in this rule are intended to facilitate the disclosure of information to investors and to simplify compliance without significantly impacting the mix of information provided to investors. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements regarding the analysis of stockholders’ equity for interim financial statements, in which entities will be required to present a reconciliation for each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is required to be measured atfiled. The final rule became effective on November 5, 2018, however the lowerSEC announced that it would not object if a filer’s first presentation of costthe changes in stockholders’ equity were included in its Form 10-Q for the

F-13F-14


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

or net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company does not believe that the provisions of ASU 2015-11 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). The ASU was issued as part of FASB’s current plan to simplify overly complex standards. This ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. The update requires retrospective application to all prior period amounts presented. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015, with early application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The Company adopted ASU 2015-03 with no impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued and provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. Certain disclosures will be required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 with no impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Revenue Recognition Related ASUs:

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

In August 2015, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2014-09”), which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, using one of two retrospective application methods. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.

In March 2016, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”). ASU 2016-10 clarifies the implementation guidance for identifying performance obligations and determining when to recognize revenue on licensing agreements for intellectual property.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition and Derivatives and Hedging: Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (“ASU 2016-11”). ASU 2016-11 rescinds certain SEC staff comments previously made in regard to these ASU’s.

F-14


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”)quarter that provide guidance on assessing collectability, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration, and completed contracts and contract modifications at transition.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to ASU 2014-09. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affect narrow aspects of the guidance in ASU 2014-09, which is not yet effective. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 address loan guarantee fees, impairment testing of contract costs, provisions for losses on construction-type and production-type contracts, and various disclosures.

The Company is evaluating its existing revenue recognition policies and the impact of ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016- 10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20, if any, on its financial position and results of operations. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments are the same asbegins after the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2014-09.of the amendments. The Company will be required to adoptadopted Release No. 33-10532 on April 1, 2019 and it did not have a material impact on the revenue recognition standard in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (fiscal year ending March 31, 2019) and interim periods within those annual periods.Company’s financial disclosures.

3. Inventories

Inventories are valued on a FIFO basis andat the lower of cost (determined on a first in first out (“FIFO”) basis) or marketnet realizable value and consisted of the following as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Raw materials

 

$

15,035

 

$

16,539

 

 

$

20,672

 

$

24,426

 

Work in process

 

 

 —

 

 

554

 

 

 

 3

 

 

 —

 

Finished goods

 

 

464

 

 

1,176

 

 

 

4,820

 

 

1,207

 

Total

 

 

15,499

 

 

18,269

 

 

 

25,495

 

 

25,633

 

Less inventory reserve

 

 

(2,814)

 

 

(3,887)

 

Less non-current portion

 

 

(961)

 

 

(2,143)

 

 

 

(1,221)

 

 

(1,403)

 

Current portion

 

$

14,538

 

$

16,126

 

 

$

21,460

 

$

20,343

 

 

The non‑current portion of inventories represents that portion of the inventories in excess of amounts expected to be used in the next twelve months. The non‑current inventories are primarily comprised of repair parts for older generation products that are still in operation, but are not technologically compatible with current configurations. The weighted average age of the non‑current portion of inventories on hand as of March 31, 20172020 is 1.91.2 years. The Company expects to use the non‑current portion of the inventories on hand as of March 31, 20172020 over the periods presented in the following table (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current Inventory

 

 

 

Non-current Inventory

 

 

 

Balance Expected

 

 

 

Balance Expected

 

Expected Period of Use

    

 

to be Used

 

    

 

to be Used

 

13 to 24 months

 

$

716

 

 

$

687

 

25 to 36 months

 

 

198

 

 

 

534

 

37 to 48 months

 

 

47

 

Total

 

$

961

 

 

$

1,221

 

 

 

F-15


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Machinery, rental equipment, equipment, automobiles and furniture

 

$

17,657

 

$

19,016

 

Machinery, equipment, automobiles and furniture

 

$

15,115

 

$

15,344

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

9,870

 

 

9,855

 

 

 

7,857

 

 

11,074

 

Molds and tooling

 

 

2,866

 

 

2,824

 

 

 

3,101

 

 

2,893

 

Rental assets

 

 

5,986

 

 

2,818

 

 

 

30,393

 

 

31,695

 

 

 

32,059

 

 

32,129

 

Less, accumulated depreciation

 

 

(28,278)

 

 

(28,158)

 

 

 

(24,310)

 

 

(26,838)

 

Total property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

2,115

 

$

3,537

 

Total property, plant, equipment and rental assets, net

 

$

7,749

 

$

5,291

 

 

The Company regularly reassesses the useful lives of property and equipment and retires assets no longer in service. Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $1.3 million and $1.0 million for each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016.

5. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2017

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Intangible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

Assets,

 

Accumulated

 

Intangible

 

 

 

Period

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Assets, Net

 

Manufacturing license

    

17 years

    

$

3,700

    

$

3,684

    

$

16

 

Technology

 

10 years

 

 

2,240

 

 

1,605

 

 

635

 

Trade name & parts, service and TA100 customer relationships

 

1.2 to 5 years

 

 

1,766

 

 

1,766

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

 

 

$

7,706

 

$

7,055

 

$

651

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Intangible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

Assets,

 

Accumulated

 

Intangible

 

 

 

Period

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Assets, Net

 

Manufacturing license

    

17 years

    

$

3,700

    

$

3,635

    

$

65

 

Technology

 

10 years

 

 

2,240

 

 

1,381

 

 

859

 

Backlog

 

Various

 

 

490

 

 

473

 

 

17

 

Trade name & parts, service and TA100 customer relationships

 

1.2 to 5 years

 

 

1,766

 

 

1,766

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

 

 

$

8,196

 

$

7,255

 

$

941

 

Amortization expense for the intangible assets was $0.3 million and $0.4 million for each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. During the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately $17,000 and $0.1 million of purchased TA100 backlog was written off to align with management’s decision to limit the production of TA100 systems on a case-by-case basis for key customers.2019, respectively.

F-16F-15


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Expected future amortization5. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2020

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Intangible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

Assets,

 

Accumulated

 

Intangible

 

 

 

Period

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Assets, Net

 

Manufacturing license

    

17 years

   

$

3,700

  

$

3,700

  

$

 —

 

Technology

 

10 years

 

 

2,240

 

 

2,240

 

 

 —

 

Trade name & parts, service and TA100 customer relationships

 

1.2 to 5 years

 

 

1,766

 

 

1,766

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

 

 

$

7,706

 

$

7,706

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2019

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Intangible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

Assets,

 

Accumulated

 

Intangible

 

 

 

Period

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Assets, Net

 

Manufacturing license

    

17 years

    

$

3,700

    

$

3,700

    

$

 —

 

Technology

 

10 years

 

 

2,240

 

 

2,053

 

 

187

 

Trade name & parts, service and TA100 customer relationships

 

1.2 to 5 years

 

 

1,766

 

 

1,766

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

 

 

$

7,706

 

$

7,519

 

$

187

 

Amortization expense offor the intangible assets as ofwas $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

Year Ending March 31,

    

Expense

 

2018

 

 

240

 

2019

 

 

224

 

2020

 

 

187

 

Thereafter

 

 

 —

 

Total expected future amortization

 

$

651

 

2020 and 2019.

The manufacturing license provides the Company with the ability to manufacture recuperator cores previously purchased from Solar Turbines Incorporated (“Solar”). The Company is required to pay a per‑unit royalty fee over a seventeen-year periodfor the life of Capstone’s patents for cores manufactured and sold by the Company using the technology. Royalties of approximately $32,100$26,400 and $35,000$33,200 were earned by Solar for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Earned royalties of approximately $10,000$52,500 and $35,000$26,100 were unpaid as of March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, and are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets.

6. Accrued Warranty Reserve

DuringThe Company provides for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,estimated costs of warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the microturbine product sold and the geography of sale. The Company’s product warranties generally start from the delivery date and continue for up to twenty-four months. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty obligation include product failure rates, anticipated hours of product operations and costs of repair or replacement in correcting product failures. These factors are estimates that may change based on new information that becomes available each period. Similarly, the Company also accrues the estimated costs to address reliability repairs on products no longer in warranty when, in the Company’s judgment, and in accordance with a specific plan developed by the Company, it is prudent to provide such repairs. The Company assesses the adequacy of recorded a one-time non-cash warranty provisionliabilities quarterly and makes adjustments to the liability as necessary. When the Company has sufficient evidence that product changes are altering the historical failure occurrence rates, the impact of approximately $5.2 million to retrofit proactively selected non-Signature Series C200 microturbines with the more robust new Signature Series generator components to improve product performance and reliability. The balance

F-16

Table of this reliability repair program as of March 31, 2017 was $2.2 million.Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

such changes is then taken into account in estimating future warranty liabilities. Changes in the accrued warranty reserve are as follows as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

    

2016

 

 

2020

    

2019

Balance, beginning of the period

 

$

1,639

 

$

3,183

 

 

$

2,614

 

$

1,682

Standard warranty provision

 

 

1,944

 

 

127

 

 

 

594

 

 

2,200

Accrual related to reliability repair programs

 

 

5,108

 

 

(16)

 

Deductions for warranty claims

 

 

(4,925)

 

 

(1,655)

 

 

 

(1,274)

 

 

(1,268)

Balance, end of the period

 

$

3,766

 

$

1,639

 

 

$

1,934

 

$

2,614

 

 

 

7. Deferred Revenue Recognition

The following table presents disaggregated revenue by business group for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

    

March 31, 2020

Microturbine Products

 

$

33,790

Accessories and Parts

 

 

14,353

Total Product, Accessories and Parts

 

 

48,143

Service

 

 

20,783

Total Revenue

 

$

68,926

Following is the geographic revenue information based on the primary operating location of the Company’s customers for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

    

March 31, 2020

United States

 

$

31,082

Mexico

 

 

2,361

All other North America

 

 

1,145

Total North America

 

 

34,588

Russia

 

 

3,653

All other Europe

 

 

12,858

Total Europe

 

 

16,511

Asia

 

 

4,074

Australia

 

 

4,559

All other

 

 

9,194

Total Revenue

 

$

68,926

Contract Balances

Our contract liabilities consist of advance payments for systems as well as deferred revenue on service obligations and extended warranties. The current portion of deferred revenue is included in current liabilities under deferred revenue and the non-current portion of deferred revenue is included in other non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

As of March 31, 2020, the balance of deferred revenue was approximately $8.8 million compared to $8.2 million as of March 31, 2019. This overall increase in the balance of deferred revenue of $0.6 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was comprised of increases in deferred revenue attributable to FPP contracts of $0.5 million

F-17

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

and DSS program of $0.1 million. Changes in deferred revenue during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

2020

    

2019

FPP Balance, beginning of the period

 

$

2,929

 

$

2,491

 

 

$

4,882

 

$

3,549

FPP Billings

 

 

13,447

 

 

11,419

 

 

 

17,004

 

 

15,650

FPP Revenue recognized

 

 

(12,962)

 

 

(10,981)

 

 

 

(16,544)

 

 

(14,318)

Balance attributed to FPP contracts

 

 

3,414

 

 

2,929

 

 

 

5,342

 

 

4,881

DSS Program

 

 

1,831

 

 

1,689

Deposits

 

 

1,636

 

 

1,439

 

 

 

1,669

 

 

1,666

Deferred revenue balance, end of the period

 

$

5,050

 

$

4,368

 

 

$

8,842

 

$

8,236

 

Deferred revenue attributed to FPP contracts represents the unearned portion of our agreements. FPP agreements are generally paid quarterly in advance with revenue recognized on a straight line basis over the contract period. Deposits are primarily non-refundable cash payments from distributors for future orders.

F-17


TableAs of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

March 31, 2020, approximately $5.3 million of revenue is expected to be recognized from remaining performance obligations for FPP service contracts. The Company expects to recognize revenue on approximately $4.4 million of these remaining performance obligations over the next 12 months and the balance of $0.9 million will be recognized thereafter. Revenue from remaining performance obligations for professional services contracts as of March 31, 2020 was not material.

8. Income Taxes

Loss before provision for income taxes consisted of the following for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

United States

 

$

(21,920)

 

$

(16,678)

 

Foreign

    

 

34

    

 

27

 

Loss before provision for income taxes

 

$

(21,886)

 

$

(16,651)

 

Current income tax provision is the amount of income taxes reported or expected to be reported on our income tax return. The provision for current income taxes was $12,000 and $8,000 for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2017 was $19,000, which was2020 and March 31, 2019, respectively. The current income taxes were related to state income and foreign taxes. The Company did not have current federal income taxes for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2020.

F-18

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Actual income tax expense differed from the amount computed by applying statutory corporate income tax rates to loss from operations before income taxes. A reconciliation of income tax (benefit) expense to the federal statutory rate follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

 

Year Ended March 31,

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Federal income tax at the statutory rate

 

$

(8,127)

 

$

(8,558)

 

Federal income tax benefit at the statutory rate

 

$

(4,596)

 

$

(3,497)

 

State taxes, net of federal effect

    

 

(225)

    

 

(250)

 

    

 

(248)

    

 

(583)

 

Foreign taxes

 

 

31

 

 

109

 

 

 

 2

 

 

 3

 

R&D tax credit

 

 

(298)

 

 

(451)

 

Expiring NOLs and tax credits

 

 

6,273

 

 

6,137

 

Impact of state rate change

 

 

(270)

 

 

478

 

 

 

24

 

 

(67)

 

Warrant liability

 

 

(474)

 

 

 —

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

5,918

 

 

5,596

 

 

 

(1,792)

 

 

(2,135)

 

Shortfall in tax benefit—stock compensation

 

 

3,352

 

 

3,058

 

 

 

321

 

 

111

 

True-up

 

 

(2)

 

 

 2

 

Other

 

 

112

 

 

38

 

 

 

30

 

 

37

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

$

19

 

$

20

 

Income tax expense

 

$

12

 

$

 8

 

 

The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year Ended March 31,

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

2020

    

2019

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventories

 

$

2,921

 

$

2,903

 

 

$

1,536

 

$

1,842

Warranty reserve

 

 

1,383

 

 

616

 

 

 

454

 

 

630

Bad debt reserve

 

 

2,514

 

 

3,350

 

 

 

139

 

 

1,245

Deferred revenue

 

 

1,254

 

 

1,101

 

 

 

1,684

 

 

1,584

Net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards

 

 

244,874

 

 

226,007

 

 

 

146,503

 

 

145,835

Tax credit carryforwards

 

 

19,784

 

 

19,411

 

 

 

15,227

 

 

16,021

Depreciation, amortization and impairment loss

 

 

2,505

 

 

3,045

 

 

 

1,652

 

 

2,734

Lease liability

 

 

1,263

 

 

 —

Interest limitation

 

 

1,570

 

 

 —

Other

 

 

2,517

 

 

4,212

 

 

 

998

 

 

1,726

Deferred tax assets

 

 

277,752

 

 

260,645

 

 

 

171,026

 

 

171,617

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

 

 

(269,299)

 

 

(252,349)

 

 

 

(169,825)

 

 

(171,617)

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

 

8,453

 

 

8,296

 

 

 

1,201

 

 

 —

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal benefit of state taxes

 

 

(8,453)

 

 

(8,296)

 

Right of use assets

 

 

(1,201)

 

 

 —

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Because of the uncertainty surrounding the timing of realizing the benefits of favorable tax attributes in future income tax returns, the Company has placed a valuation allowance against its net deferred income tax assets. The change in valuation allowance for fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $17.0$1.8 million and $5.6$2.1 million, respectively. The $17.0 million change in valuation allowance for fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 includes a current year income tax expense of $5.9 million and recognition of previously unrecognized excess tax benefits of $11.2 million as a result of the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-09.

F-18F-19


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Company’s NOL and tax credit carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes at March 31, 20172020 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

    

Amount

    

Period

 

    

Amount

    

Period

 

Federal NOL

 

$

677,995

 

2018 - 2035

 

Federal NOL generated before April 1, 2018

 

$

604,959

 

2021 - 2038

 

Federal NOL generated after March 31, 2018

 

$

38,730

 

Indefinite

 

State NOL

 

$

160,223

 

2017 - 2035

 

 

$

162,008

 

2021 - 2039

 

Federal tax credit carryforwards

 

$

10,093

 

2018 - 2035

 

 

$

7,570

 

2021 - 2038

 

State tax credit carryforwards

 

$

9,692

 

Indefinite

 

 

$

9,692

 

Indefinite

 

 

The NOLs and federal and state tax credits can be carried forward to offset future taxable income, if any. Utilization of the NOLs and tax credits are subject to an annual limitation of approximately $57.3 million due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. The federal tax credit carryforward is a research and development credit, which may be carried forward. The state tax credits consist of a research and development credit can be carried forward indefinitely.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Based on management’s evaluation, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits related to research and development credits as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $2.8$2.3 million and $2.7$2.4 million, respectively. There were no interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 20172020 or March 31, 2016.2019. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate as of March 31, 20172020 and March 31, 20162019 was $2.8$2.3 million and $2.7$2.4 million, respectively. However, this impact would be offset by an equal increase in the deferred tax valuation allowance as the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets because of uncertainty as to future realization. The fully reserved recognized federal and state deferred tax assets related to research and development credits balance as of March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $10.2$7.6 million and $9.8$8.4 million, and $9.9$9.7 million and $9.5$9.0 million, respectively.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of total gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2015

 

$

2,564

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

 

$

2,467

 

Gross increase related to prior year tax positions

 

 

13

 

 

 

 —

 

Gross increase related to current year tax positions

 

 

124

 

 

 

 —

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(77)

 

Balance at March 31, 2016

 

$

2,701

 

Balance at March 31, 2019

 

$

2,390

 

Gross increase related to prior year tax positions

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

Gross increase related to current year tax positions

 

 

124

 

 

 

 —

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(118)

 

Balance at March 31, 2017

 

$

2,825

 

Balance at March 31, 2020

 

$

2,272

 

 

The Company does not expect a material change to its unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2012.2014. However, net operating loss carryforwards remain subject to examination to the extent they are carried forward and impact a year that is open to examination by tax authorities. The Company’sCompany's evaluation was performed for the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as

F-20

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

of March 31, 2017.2020. When applicable, the Company accounts for interest and penalties generated by tax contingencies as interest and other expense, net in the statements of operations.

F-19


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted on March 27, 2020 in the U.S. The CARES Act includes many measures to assist companies, including temporary changes to income and non-income-based tax laws. The Company currently does not expect the CARES Act to have a material impact on the Company’s financial results, including on the Company’s annual estimated effective tax rate. The Company will continue to monitor and assess the impact the CARES Act, and similar legislation in other countries, with respect to what impact they may have on the Company’s business and financial results.

9. Stockholders’ Equity

The following table summarizes, by statement of operations line item, stock-based compensation expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Ended March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

2017

    

2016

 

 

2020

    

2019

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

65

    

$

325

 

 

$

69

    

$

51

 

Research and development

 

 

29

 

 

74

 

 

 

44

 

 

32

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

716

 

 

2,171

 

 

 

800

 

 

824

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

$

810

 

$

2,570

 

 

$

913

 

$

907

 

 

2000 and 2017 Equity Incentive PlanPlans

In June 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (“2000 Plan”). The 2000 Plan provides for a total maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued of 1,849,000184,900 shares. In June 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted the Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) which was approved by the stockholders at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders on August 31, 2017 (the “2017 Annual Meeting”). The 20002017 Plan provides for awards of up to 300,000 shares of common stock. The 2017 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee designated by the Board of Directors.(the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee’s authority includes determining the number of incentive awards and vesting provisions. In August 2015,On June 5, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and the shareholders approved an amendment of the 2017 Plan to increase the 2000 Plan. The amendment includes an increaseaggregate number of 450,000 shares of common stock availableauthorized for issuance under the 2000 Plan.2017 Plan by 300,000 shares of common stock. The amendment of the 2017 Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders on August 30, 2018.

On August 29, 2019, at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting, the Registrant’s stockholders approved another amendment to the 2017 Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2017 Plan by 300,000 shares to 900,000 shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2017,2020, there were 136,555398,993 shares available for future grants under the 20002017 Plan.

Stock Options

The Company issued stock options under the 2000 Plan and issues stock options under the 20002017 Plan to employees, non-employee directors and consultants that vest and become exercisable over a four-year period and expire 10 years after the grant date. The Company uses a Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of the options at the grant date, and compensation cost is recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company established an accounting policy election to assume zero forfeiture for stock options and account for forfeitures when they occur. All options are subject to the following vesting provisions: one-fourth vest one year after the issuance date and 1/48th vest on the

F-21

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

first day of each full month thereafter, so that all options will be vested on the first day of the 48th month after the grant date. Information relating to stock options for fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

Remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Contractual

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

Term

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in years)

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at March 31, 2016

    

467,631

    

$

22.68

    

 

    

 

 

 

Granted

 

88,930

 

$

1.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited, cancelled or expired

 

(242,024)

 

$

24.32

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at March 31, 2017

 

314,537

 

$

15.48

 

5.4

 

 

 —

 

Options fully vested at March 31, 2017 and those expected to vest beyond March 31, 2017

 

314,537

 

$

15.48

 

5.4

 

 

 —

 

Options exercisable at March 31, 2017

 

225,607

 

$

20.92

 

3.8

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

Remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Contractual

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

Term

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in years)

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at March 31, 2019

    

17,499

    

$

209.36

    

 

    

 

 

 

Granted

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited, cancelled or expired

 

(6,250)

 

$

198.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at March 31, 2020

 

11,249

 

$

215.56

 

2.1

 

 

 —

 

Options fully vested at March 31, 2020 and those expected to vest beyond March 31, 2020

 

11,249

 

$

215.56

 

2.1

 

 

 —

 

Options exercisable at March 31, 2020

 

11,249

 

$

215.56

 

2.1

 

 

 —

 

 

F-20


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Black-Scholes Model Valuation Assumptions

The Company calculated the estimated fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using the Black Scholes valuation method and the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

March 31,

 

2017

2016

Risk-free interest rates

 

1.3

%

 

1.5

%

Expected lives (in years)

 

5.7

 

 

5.7

 

Dividend yield

 

 —

%

 

%

Expected volatility

 

133.9

%

 

59.0

%

Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the period

$

1.52

 

$

6.84

 

The Company’s computation of expected volatility for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was based on historical volatility. The expected life, or term, of options granted is derived from historical exercise behavior and represents the period of time that stock option awards are expected to be outstanding. Management has selected a risk-free rate based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury Securities with a maturity equivalent to the options’ expected term.

The Company recorded expense of approximately $20,000 and $1.2 million associated with itsThere were no stock options for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, there was approximately $0.1 million of total compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards that is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of 3.4 years. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, the Company’s executive management team voluntarily agreed to cancel and terminate a total of 65,508 unvested stock options that had been previously issued to them. There was approximately $0.7 million of total compensation cost related to the cancellation of these stock options recordedgranted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2020 or 2019. There was no expense associated with stock options during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 or 2019. There were no unvested stock option awards as of March 31, 2020.

Restricted Stock Units and Performance Restricted Stock Units

The Company issued restricted stock units under the 2000 Plan and issues restricted stock units under the 20002017 Plan to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The restricted stock units are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance, and compensation cost is recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Company established an accounting policy election to assume zero forfeiture for restricted stock units and account for forfeitures when they occur.occur through the adoption of ASU 2016-09. The restricted stock units vest in equal installments over a period of four years. For restricted stock units with four year vesting, one-fourth vest annually beginning one year after the issuance date. The restricted stock units issued to non-employee directors vest one year after the issuance date. The following table outlines the restricted stock unit and PRSUperformance restricted stock unit (“PRSU”) activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant

 

 

 

 

 

Date Fair

 

Restricted Stock and Performance Restricted Stock Units

 

Shares

 

Value

 

Nonvested restricted stock units outstanding at March 31, 2016

    

256,787

    

$

6.53

 

Granted

 

230,439

 

 

1.64

 

Vested and issued

 

(96,111)

 

 

8.35

 

Forfeited

 

(74,406)

 

 

4.65

 

Nonvested restricted stock units outstanding at March 31, 2017

 

316,709

 

 

2.85

 

Restricted stock units expected to vest beyond March 31, 2017

 

316,686

 

$

2.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant

 

 

 

 

 

Date Fair

 

Restricted Stock Units and Performance Restricted Stock Units

 

Shares

 

Value

 

Nonvested restricted stock units outstanding at March 31, 2019

    

221,778

    

$

10.20

 

Granted

 

262,370

 

 

4.74

 

Vested and issued

 

(100,296)

 

 

9.84

 

Forfeited

 

(53,022)

 

 

8.34

 

Nonvested restricted stock units outstanding at March 31, 2020

 

330,830

 

 

6.28

 

Restricted stock units expected to vest beyond March 31, 2020

 

330,830

 

$

6.28

 

F-21F-22


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table provides additional information on restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units for the Company’s fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

2017

    

2016

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Restricted stock compensation expense (in thousands)

 

$

686

    

$

891

 

 

    

$

913

    

$

907

 

Aggregate fair value of restricted stock units vested and issued (in thousands)

 

$

132

 

$

346

 

 

    

$

384

    

$

748

 

Weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the period

 

$

1.64

 

$

3.34

 

 

    

$

4.74

    

$

0.98

 

As of March 31, 2017,2020, there was approximately $0.5$1.2 million of total compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units that is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of 1.52.4 years.

The Company’s PRSU activity is included in the above restricted stock units tables. In May 2014,The PRSU program has a two-year or three-year performance measurement period. The performance measurement occurs in the second year (for a two-year grant) or third year (for a three-year grant) following the grant date. The program is intended to have overlapping performance measurement periods (e.g., a new three-year cycle begins each year on April 1), subject to Compensation Committee approval. At the end of each performance measurement period, the Compensation Committee ofwill determine the Company’s Board of Directors approvedachievement against the new Performance Restricted Stock Unit Program, which is applicable to certain senior employees. The Chief Executive Officer is the only participant for Fiscal 2017. For the first year of the program, the PRSU grant for the Chief Executive Officer is broken out into two performance measurement periods. The first performance measurement period began on April 1, 2015 and will end on March 31, 2017; the second performance measurement period has a three-year term that began on April 1, 2015 and will end on March 31, 2018. Any earned PRSU awards will vest 50% after the end of the applicable performance measurement period and 50% one year thereafter.objectives.

There were no PRSUs granted duringDuring the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. 2020, the Company granted 30,139 PRSUs with a third-year performance measurement and the criteria measured by the Company’s cash flow from operations and aftermarket sales absorption. The target PRSU awards for each participant, will be paid upon achievement of the target level of performance for cash flow from operations and aftermarket sale absorption, taking into account the applicable weighting for the individual metric. Achievement of a performance goal at the threshold level will result in a payment that is 50% of the target PRSU award. Achievement of a performance goal at the maximum level will result in a payment that is 150% of the target PRSU award. The Compensation Committee will use an interpolation table that weights performance between levels for determining the portion of the Target PRSU that is earned.

The weighted average per share grant date fair value of PRSUs granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016Fiscal 2020 was $15.50.$8.90. Based on ourthe Company’s assessment as of March 31, 2017,2020, the PRSU threshold for one of the first performance measurement likely will not bemeasurements on the 2-year vesting PRSU was met and as a result nowe recorded compensation expense was recorded or recognizedof approximately $0.1 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. Compensation2020. Such compensation expense if any, will beis recognized over the corresponding requisite service period and will be adjusted in subsequent reporting periods if the Company’s assessment of the probable level of achievement of the performance goals changes. The Company will continue to periodically assess the likelihood of the PRSU threshold being met until the end of the applicable performance period.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company issuesissued restricted stock awards under the 2000 Plan to employees and non-employee directors. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company grantedThere were no restricted stock awards to non-employee directors who elected to take payment of all or any part of the directors’ fees in stock in lieu of cash. Duringgranted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, the Company granted stock awards in lieu of cash to employees for variable compensation. The following table outlines the2020 or 2019. No expense was recorded associated with its restricted stock awards activity forduring the Company’s fiscal yearsyear ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

Ended March 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Restricted stock awards compensation expense (in thousands)

 

$

104

 

$

431

 

Restricted stock awards granted

 

 

65,167

 

 

305,725

 

Weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the period

 

$

1.59

 

$

1.41

 

2020 or 2019.

For each term of the Board of Directors (beginning on the date of an annual meeting of stockholders and ending on the date immediately preceding the next annual meeting of stockholders), a non-employee director may elect to

F-22


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

receive a stock award in lieu of all or any portion of their annual retainer or committee fee cash payment. The shares of stock were valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

2000

F-23

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In June 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”“ESPP”). The Purchase PlanESPP provides for the granting of rights to purchase common stock to regular full and part-time employees or officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. UnderIn June 2017, the Purchase Plan,Board unanimously approved an amendment and restatement to the ESPP which was approved by the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on August 31, 2017. Prior to the current amendment, 7,000 shares of the Company’s common stock had been reserved for issuance. As amended, the ESPP continued by its terms and the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available increased by 50,000 shares which reserved for issuance a total of 57,000 shares of common stock. Under the ESPP, shares of the Company’s common stock will beare issued upon exercise of the purchase rights. Under the Purchase Plan, an aggregate of 70,000 shares may be issued pursuant to the exercise of purchase rights. The Purchase PlanESPP will continue by its terms through June 30, 2020, unless terminated sooner. The maximum amount that an employee can contribute during a purchase right period is $25,000 or 15% of the employee’s regular compensation. Under the Purchase Plan,ESPP, the exercise price of a purchase right is 95% of the fair market value of such shares on the last day of the purchase right period. The fair market value of the stock is its closing price as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market on the day in question. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company issued a total of 10,063522 shares and 5,658101 shares of stock, respectively, to regular full and part-time employees or officers of the Company who elected to participate in the Purchase Plan.ESPP. As of March 31, 2017,2020, there were 4,75748,838 shares available for future grant under the Purchase Plan.

Grants outside of the 2000 Plan

As of March 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding 88,930 non-qualified common stock options and 14,820 restricted stock units issued outside of the 2000 Plan. The Company granted these stock options and restricted stock units during Fiscal 2017 as inducement grants to the new Vice President, Manufacturing of the Company, with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

Although the options and restricted stock units were not granted under the 2000 Plan, they are governed by terms and conditions identical to those under the 2000 Plan. All options are subject to the following vesting provisions: one-fourth vest one year after the issuance date and 1/48th vest on the first day of each full month thereafter, so that all options will be vested on the first day of the 48th month after the grant date. All outstanding options have a contractual term of ten years. The restricted stock units vest in equal installments over a period of four years.ESPP.

Stockholder Rights Plan

On May 6, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 5 (the “Amendment”) to the Rights Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 3, 2008, Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 9, 2011, Amendment No. 3, dated as of July 1, 2014 and Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 5, 2014, (the “Original Rights Agreement”) between the Company and Computershare Inc. 

The Amendment accelerated the expiration of the Company’s preferred share purchase rights (the “Original Rights”) from 5:00 p.m., California time, on the 30 day after the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders to 5:00 p.m., California time, on May 6, 2016, and had the effect of terminating the Original Rights Agreement on that date. At the time of the termination of the Original Rights Agreement, all of the Original Rights distributed to holders of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Original Rights Agreement expired.

On May 6, 2016, the Company entered into a rights agreement (the “NOL Rights Agreement”) with Computershare Inc., as rights agent. In connection with the NOL Rights Agreement,2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized and(the “Board”), declared a dividend distribution of one preferred stock purchase right (a “New Right”) for each share of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, authorized and outstanding.$0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”). The dividend will be paid to the stockholders of record at the close of business on May 16, 2019 (the “Record Date”). Each New Right entitles the registered holder, subject to the terms of the NOL Rights Agreement (as defined below), to purchase from the Company a unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of the Company’s Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock

F-23


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

par value $0.001 per share, (the “Preferred Stock”) at a purchase price of $8.76 per unit,$5.22 (the “Exercise Price”), subject to adjustment.certain adjustments. The description and terms of the New Rights are set forth in the Rights Agreement dated as of May 6, 2019 (the “NOL Rights Agreement”) between the Company and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).

The NOL Rights Agreement.Agreement replaces the Company’s Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2016, by and between the Company and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Computershare Inc., as rights agent (the “Original Rights Agreement”). The Original Rights Agreement, and the rights thereunder to purchase fractional shares of Preferred Stock, expired at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 6, 2019 and the NOL Rights Agreement was entered into immediately thereafter.

The purpose of the NOL Rights Agreement is to diminish the risk that the Company’s ability to use its net operating losses and certain other tax assets (collectively, “Tax Benefits”) to reduce potential future federal income tax obligations would become subject to limitations by reason of the Company’s experiencing an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”). A company generally experiences such an ownership change if the percentage of its stock owned by its “5-percent shareholders,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal RevenueTax Code, of 1986, increases by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. The NOL Rights Agreement is designed to reduce the likelihood that the Company will experience an ownership change under Section 382 of the Internal RevenueTax Code of 1986 by (i) discouraging any person or group from becoming a 4.99%4.9% shareholder and (ii) discouraging any existing 4.99%4.9% shareholder from acquiring additional shares of the Company’s stock.

The New Rights will not be exercisable until the earlier to occur of (i) the close of business on the tenth business day after a public announcement or filing that a person has, or group of affiliated or associated persons or persons acting in concert have, become an “Acquiring Person,” which is defined as a person or group of affiliated or associated persons or persons acting in concert who, at any time after the date of the NOL Rights Agreement, have acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 4.99%4.9% or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock,Common Stock, subject to certain exceptions or (ii) the close of

F-24

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

business on the tenth business day after the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to commence, a tender offer or exchange offer the consummation of which would result in any person becoming an Acquiring Person (the earlier of such dates being called the “Distribution Date”). Certain synthetic interests in securities created by derivative positions, whether or not such interests are considered to be ownership of the underlying common stockCommon Stock or are reportable for purposes of Regulation 13D of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are treated as beneficial ownership of the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock equivalent to the economic exposure created by the derivative position, to the extent actual shares of the common stockCommon Stock are directly or indirectly held by counterparties to the derivatives contracts.

With respect to certificates representing shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date, until the Distribution Date, the New Rights will be evidenced by such certificates for shares of Common Stock registered in the names of the holders thereof, and not by separate Rights Certificates, as described further below. With respect to book entry shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date, until the Distribution Date, the New Rights will be evidenced by the balances indicated in the book entry account system of the transfer agent for the Common Stock. Until the earlier of the Distribution Date and the Expiration Date, as described below, the transfer of any shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date will also constitute the transfer of the New Rights associated with such shares of Common Stock. As soon as practicable after the Distribution Date, separate certificates evidencing the New Rights (“Right Certificates”) will be mailed to holders of record of the Common Stock as of the close of business on the Distribution Date, and such Right Certificates alone will evidence the New Rights.

The New Rights, which are not exercisable until the Distribution Date, will expire prior to the earliest of (i) May 6, 20192022 or such later day as may be established by the Board of Directors prior to the expiration of the New Rights, provided that the extension is submitted to the Company’s stockholders for ratification at the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company succeeding such extension; (ii) the time at which the New Rights are redeemed pursuant to the NOL Rights Agreement; (iii) the time at which the New Rights are exchanged pursuant to the NOL Rights Agreement; (iv) the time at which the New Rights are terminated upon the occurrence of certain transactions; (v) the close of business on the first day after the Company’s 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders, if approval by the stockholders of the Company of the NOL Rights Agreement has not been obtained on or prior to the close of business on the first day after the Company’s 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders; (vi) the close of business on the effective date of the repeal of Section 382 of the Internal RevenueTax Code, of 1986, if the Board of Directors determines that the NOL Rights Agreement is no longer necessary or desirable for the preservation of Tax Benefits; and (vii) the close of business on the first day of a taxable year of the Company to which the Board of Directors determines that no Tax Benefits are available to be carried forward.forward, (the earliest of (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) and (vii) is referred to as the “Expiration Date”).

Each share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock will be entitled, when, as and if declared, to a preferential per share quarterly dividend payment equal to the greater of (i) $1.00 per share or (ii) an amount equal to 1,000 times the aggregate quarterly dividend declared per share of common stock.Common Stock since the immediately preceding quarterly dividend payment date for the Common Stock (or, with respect to the first quarterly dividend payment on the Common Stock, since the first issuance of the Preferred Stock). Each share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock will entitle the holder thereof to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company. In the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of common stockCommon Stock are converted or exchanged, each share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive 1,000 times the amount received per one share of Common Stock.

Offerings of Common Stock and Warrants and At-the-Market Offering Program

At-the-Market Offering

Effective August 28, 2015, the Company entered into a sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC with respect to an at-the-market offering program pursuant to which the Company offered and sold, from time to time at its sole discretion, shares of its common stock.

stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0 million. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, the Company issued 0.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock under this at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the Company’s common stock were

F-24F-25


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Offeringsapproximately $4.0 million after deducting commissions paid of Common Stock and Warrants and At-the-Market Offering Program

On October 18, 2016, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell 3.6approximately $0.1 million. As of March 31, 2019, 2.6 million shares of common stock, pre-funded Series B warrants to purchase up to 2.7 million shares of common stock, and Series A warrants to purchase up to 6.3 million shares of common stock. Pursuant to a placement agent agreement, dated as of October 18, 2016, the Company engaged Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as the lead placement agent for the offering and ROTH Capital Partners, LLC as co-placement agent for the offering. Each share of common stock was sold at a price of $1.20. Each Series B warrant was issued with an exercise price of $1.20 per share of common stock, $1.19 of which was pre-funded at closing and $0.01 of which is payable upon exercise. Each Series A warrant was issued with an initial exercise price of $1.34 per share of common stock. These Series A warrants contain anti-dilution provisions that reduce the exercise price of the warrants if certain dilutive issuances occur. The anti-dilution provisions of the Series A warrants are subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders. The Series A warrants are classified as liabilities under the caption “Warrant liability” in the accompanying balance sheets and recorded at estimated fair value with the corresponding charge under the caption “Change in fair value of warrant liability” in the accompanying statements of operations. See Note 10—Fair Value Measurements for disclosure regarding the fair value of financial instruments. The net proceeds to the Company from this offering, after deducting the placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses, were approximately $6.8 million. The offering closed on October 21, 2016.

On April 19, 2016, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as the sole book-running manager, and Rodman & Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, as the co-manager, related to the public offering of 2.7 million shares of our common stock and pre-funded Series B warrants to purchase up to 5.5 million shares of common stock, which were offered in lieu of common stock to those purchasers whose purchase of common stock in the offering otherwise would result in the purchaser beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding common stock following the completion of the offering. Also included in the offering were Series A warrants to purchase 4.1 million shares of common stock. Every two shares of common stock were cumulatively sold with one Series A warrantpursuant to purchase one share of common stock at a collective negotiated price of $3.50. Every two Series B warrants were sold with one Series A warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a collective negotiated price of $3.48. The Series A warrants are exercisable, subject to certain limitations, during the period commencing six months afterat-the-market offering program and the date of the issuance and expire five years after the first day they are exercisable. The pre-funded Series B warrants were exercisable, subject to certain limitations, upon issuance and expire nine months from the date of issuance, subject to extension under certain circumstances. The net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the common stock and warrants,were approximately $28.6 million after deducting fees and othercommissions paid of approximately $0.8 million. This at-the-market offering expenses, were approximately $13.1 million. The offering closedprogram expired on April 22, 2016.May 29, 2018.

The following table outlines the warrant activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A

 

Series B

 

 

    

Warrants

    

Warrants

 

Balance, March 31, 2016

 

 —

 

 —

 

Issuance of warrants

 

10,407,500

 

8,215,000

 

Warrants exercised

 

 —

 

(8,215,000)

 

Balance, March 31, 2017

 

10,407,500

 

 —

 

Effective August 28, 2015,On June 7, 2018, the Company entered into a sales agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC with respect to an at-the-market offering program pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion, shares of its common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0$25.0 million. The Company will set the parameters for sales of the shares, including the number to be sold, the time period during which sales are requested to be made, any limitation on the number that may be sold in one trading day and any minimum price below which sales may not be made. During the three monthsfiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we2020, the Company issued 0.41.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock

F-25


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

under the at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the Company’s common stock were approximately $0.3$5.3 million after deducting commissions paid of approximately $8,800. As of March 31, 2017, 7.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock were sold pursuant to the at-the-market offering program and the net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the common stock were approximately $12.8 million after deducting commissions paid of approximately $0.4$0.2 million. As of March 31, 2017,2020, approximately $12.2 million remained available for issuance with respect to thethis at-the-market offering program.

Warrants

On April 13, 2018, a warrant holder exercised its rights to the warrant agreement to exercise on a cashless basis 576,000 Series A warrants at an exercise price of $6.00 per share under the warrant agreement. In accordance with terms of the warrant agreement, after taking into account the shares withheld to satisfy the cashless exercise option, the Company issued 380,621 shares of common stock.

As of March 31, 2020, there were 271,875 Series A warrants outstanding and there are no Series B warrants outstanding. Of the total Series A warrants outstanding, 217,875 Series A warrants were issued with an exercise price of $25.50 per share of common stock, and have an expiration date of October 25, 2021, and 54,000 Series A warrants with anti-dilution provisions were issued with an initial exercise price of $13.40 per share of common stock, and have an expiration date of April 22, 2021. As of March 31, 2020, because of the anti-dilution provisions, these warrants had an adjusted exercise price of $1.15 per share of common stock.

On February 4, 2019, the Company sold to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (the “Holder”), a Purchase Warrant for Common Shares (the “Warrant”) pursuant to which the Holder may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Shares”) in an aggregate amount of up to 404,634 shares (the “Warrant Shares”). The Warrant was sold to the Holder at a purchase price of $150,000, in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act.

The Warrant may be exercised by the Holder at any time after August 4, 2019 at an exercise price equal to $8.86 and will expire on February 4, 2024. The Warrant contains standard adjustment provisions in the event of additional stock issuances below the exercise price of the warrant, stock splits, combinations, rights offerings and similar transactions. The value of the Warrant was $2.3 million, and has been classified as an equity instrument in additional paid in capital in our consolidated balance sheets. The value of the Warrant was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model using the following assumptions:

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31, 2019

Risk-free interest rate

2.5%

Contractual term

5 years

Expected volatility

76%

F-26

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Company’s common stock and warrant transactions during Fiscal 2020 triggered certain anti-dilution provisions in the warrants outstanding. As a result, the Company issued an additional 49,891 warrants and recorded a deemed dividend amounting to $87,362.

On December 9, 2019, the Company entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Purchase Warrant for Common shares (the “Amendment No. 1”) with Special Situations Investing Group II, LLC (as successor in interest to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC) (the “Warrant Holder”) that amends the Warrant. The Amendment No. 1 amends the first paragraph of the Warrant to increase the number of Warrant Shares issuable under the Warrant (on a post-reverse split basis) and to decrease the exercise price from $8.86 per share (on a post-reverse split basis) to $3.80 per share (the “Per Share Warrant Exercise Price”). The Amendment No. 1 also amends Section 2.1 of the Warrant such that the Per Share Anti-Dilution Price is equal to the Per Share Warrant Exercise Price. As a result of the decrease in exercise price, we recorded the change in valuation of $0.3 million as additional debt discount with a corresponding entry to additional paid in capital in the consolidated balance sheets.

On September 4, 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities  Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional and accredited investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering (the “Registered Direct Offering”) an aggregate of 580,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share at a negotiated purchase price of $5.00 per share, and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 440,000 shares of our common stock at a negotiated purchase price of $5.00 per Pre-Funded Warrant, for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $5.1 million (580,000 shares of our common stock plus 440,000 pre-funded warrants at a $5.00 per share purchase price), before deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. Net proceeds from the offering were $4.6 million. The offering closed on September 9, 2019. On October 24, 2019, a warrant holder exercised its rights to the warrant agreement to exercise on a cash basis 440,000 pre-funded warrants at an exercise price of $0.001 per share under the warrant agreement.

In a concurrent private placement, we agreed to issue to the purchasers warrants to purchase 765,000 shares of Common Stock, which represent 75% of the number of shares of Common Stock and shares underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants purchased in the Registered Direct Offering, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement. The Common Warrants will be exercisable for shares of Common Stock at an initial exercise price of $6.12 per share for a period of five years, starting on April 2, 2020 and expiring on April 2, 2025. None of these warrants have been exercised as of the date of this report.

Stock to Vendors

On February 10, 2020, the Company and Andretti Autosport 6, Inc. (“AA”), a race team participating in the IndyCar Series sanctioned by INDYCAR, LLC (the “Series”), entered into a Sponsorship Agreement (the “Sponsorship Agreement”) effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, whereby the Company agreed to sponsor AA’s Car #88 participation in the Series on a full-time basis. In exchange for AA’s participation in the Series, the Company agreed to a sponsorship fee in the total amount of approximately, $1.3 million of which $0.7 million will be paid in cash due and payable in four installments and $0.6 million in unregistered shares of common stock of the Company. 

During the term of the Sponsorship Agreement and any renewal or extension of the agreement, the Company has agreed that it shall exclusively sponsor the AA Group (as defined therein). The Sponsorship Agreement contains, among other provisions, certain representations and warranties by the parties, intellectual property protection covenants, certain indemnification rights in favor of each party and customary confidentiality provisions. 

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the IndyCar Series was delayed and did not begin until June 2020.  Cash paid under the Sponsorship Agreement was $0.3 million as of March 31, 2020 and stock in the amount of 229,886was issued as of February 10, 2020.  Both the cash and the value of the unregistered shares of common stock have been recorded as

F-27

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

a prepaid marketing cost and are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Stockholder’s Equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2020.

10. Fair Value Measurements

The FASB has established a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1.  Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2.  Inputs to the valuation methodology include:

·

Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets

·

Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets

·

Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability

·

Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means

If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3.  Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The asset or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

F-26


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The table below presents our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis during Fiscal 2017 and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

 

Significant Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Total

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Cash equivalents

    

$

7,520

    

$

7,520

    

$

 —

    

$

 —

 

Restricted cash

    

$

5,514

    

$

5,514

    

$

 —

    

$

 —

 

Warrant liability

    

$

(2,917)

    

$

 —

    

$

 —

    

$

(2,917)

 

Cash equivalents include cash held in money market and U.S. Treasury Funds at March 31, 2017.

The table below presents our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis during Fiscal 2016 and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

 

Significant Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Total

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Cash equivalents

    

$

3,002

    

$

3,002

    

$

 —

    

$

 —

 

Restricted cash

    

$

5,002

    

$

5,002

    

$

 —

    

$

 —

 

Cash equivalents include cash held in money market and U.S. Treasury Funds at March 31, 2016.

Basis for Valuation

The carrying values reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair values because of the immediate or short-term maturities of these financial instruments. As the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility areThe term note payable has been recorded net of a discount based on adjustable market interest rates, the Company has determined that the carrying value approximates the fair value.value of the associated warrant and capitalized debt issuance costs. The carrying values and estimated fair values of these obligations are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2017

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

 

    

Value

    

Fair Value

    

Value

    

Fair Value

 

Obligations under the credit facility

    

$

11,533

    

$

11,533

    

$

9,459

    

$

9,459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2020

 

March 31, 2019

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

 

    

Value

    

Fair Value

    

Value

    

Fair Value

 

Term note payable

 

$

27,963

    

$

30,000

 

$

27,099

    

$

30,000

 

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Company sold and issued additional warrants that provide certain anti-dilution protections for the Holders. See Note 9— Offerings of Common Stock and Warrants and At-the-Market Offering Program for further discussion. The fair value of the Series A warrants issued on October 21, 2016 was $4.2 million after giving effect to anti-dilution adjustments under the assumption that the anti-dilution mechanism contained in the Series A warrants was in effect. The change in the estimated fair value of the Series A warrants from the October 21, 2016 to March 31, 2017 was $1.3 million and has been recorded under the caption “Change in fair value of warrant liability” in the accompanying statement of operations. The Company will continue to adjust the warrant liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise of the warrants, modification of the warrants, or expiration of the warrants. Changes in the fair value of Series A warrants will be recorded in the statements of operations under the

F-27F-28


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

caption “Change

11. Term Note Payable

On February 4, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), by and among us, certain subsidiaries of us party thereto as guarantors, Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc. and any other purchasers party thereto from time to time (collectively, the “Purchaser”) and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc. Under the Note Purchase Agreement, we sold to the Purchaser $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (the “Notes”), which bear interest at a rate of 13.0% per annum and payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year until maturity. The first interest payment on the Notes will be on March 31, 2019. The entire principal amount of the Notes is due and payable on February 4, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”). The Notes do not amortize and the entire principal balance is due in fair valuea single payment on the Maturity Date. As of warrant liability.”March 31, 2019, $30.0 million in borrowings were outstanding under the three-year term note.

Obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement are secured by all of our assets, including intellectual property and general intangibles. The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary covenants, including, among others, covenants that restrict our ability to incur debt, grant liens, make certain investments and acquisitions, pay dividends, repurchase equity interests, repay certain debt, amend certain contracts, enter into affiliate transactions and asset sales or make certain equity issuances (including equity issuances that would cause an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code), and covenants that require us to, among other things, provide annual, quarterly and monthly financial statements, together with related compliance certificates, maintain its property in good repair, maintain insurance and comply with applicable laws.

On December 9, 2019, the Company entered into a Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Note Purchase Agreement. Under the Second Amendment, the parties agreed to amend Section 6.21 of the Note Purchase Agreement to increase the Section 382 Ownership Shift threshold to not exceed 40.0%.

The financial covenants of the Note Purchase Agreement require the Company not to exceed specified levels of Adjusted EBITDA losses relative to its financial model, beginning with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2020. Additionally, we shall not permit our minimum consolidated liquidity, which consists of our cash and cash equivalents, to be less than $12.0 million through February 4, 2020, and $9.0 million thereafter. As of March 31, 2020, the Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in the Note Purchase Agreement.

The three-year term note has been recorded net of a discount based on the fair value of the Company’s warrant liability (see Note 9— Offerings of Common Stock and Warrants and At-the-Market Offering Program) recorded in the Company’s financial statements was determined using the Monte Carlo simulation valuation method and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock in an active market, a Level 3 measurement. Volatility was based on the actual market activity of the Company’s stock. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the warrants, and the risk free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury Securities with a maturity equivalent to the warrants’ expected life.

The Company calculated the estimated fair value of warrants on the date of issuance and at each subsequent reporting date using the following assumptions:

Year Ended

March 31, 2017

Risk-free interest rate

1.9%

Contractual term

5.1 years

Expected volatility

67.6%

From time to time, the Company sellsassociated common stock warrants that are derivative instruments. The Company does not enter into speculative derivative agreements and does not enter into derivative agreementsdebt issuance costs totaling $2.0 million. Amortization of the debt discount and debt issuance costs was $1.2 million for the purpose of hedging risks.

As discussed above, the Company adopted authoritative guidance issued by the FASBfiscal year ended March 31, 2020, based on contracts in an entity’s own equity that requires the common stock warrants to be classifiedeffective interest rate, and has been recorded as liabilities at their estimated fair value with changes in fair value at each reporting date recognizedinterest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The table below provides a reconciliation of

Interest expense related to the beginning and ending balances forterm note payable during the warrant liabilityfiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was $5.2 million, which is measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

Balance, March 31, 2016

$

 —

Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses:

Income included in change in fair value of warrant liability

1,323

Issuances

(4,240)

Balance, March 31, 2017

$

(2,917)

11. Revolving Credit Facility

Former Credit Facility  The Company maintained two Credit and Security Agreements, as amended (the “Credit Agreements”), with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), which provided the Company with a line of credit of up to $20.0includes $1.2 million in amortization of debt issuance costs.

When we entered into the aggregate.Note Purchase Agreement the existing credit facility with Bridge Bank was paid in full. As previously disclosed, the twelfth amendmentsuch, there was no interest expense related to the Credit Agreements provided the Company the right, under certain circumstances, to increase the borrowing capacity available under the Company’s revolving lines of credit to an aggregate maximum of $20.0 million from an aggregate maximum of $15.0 million (the “Accordion Feature”). In addition, Wells Fargo provided the Company with a non‑revolving capital expenditure line of credit up to $0.5 million to acquire additional eligible equipment for use in the Company’s business. Effective as of June 30, 2015, the Company exercised the Accordion Feature, thereby increasing the maximum borrowing capacity available to a maximum of $20.0 million. The amount actually available to the Company varied from time to time depending on, among other factors, the amount of its eligible inventory and accounts receivable. As security for the payment and performance of the credit facility during the Company granted a security interestfiscal year ended March 31, 2020.   Interest expense related to the credit facility during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 was $0.7 million, which includes $0.1 million in favoramortization of Wells Fargo in substantially all of the assets of the Company.debt issuance costs.

F-28F-29


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Credit Agreements included affirmative covenants as well as negative covenants that prohibit a variety of actions without Wells Fargo’s consent, including covenants that limit the Company’s ability to (a) incur or guarantee debt, (b) create liens, (c) enter into any merger, recapitalization or similar transaction or purchase all or substantially all of the assets or stock of another entity, (d) pay dividends on, or purchase, acquire, redeem or retire shares of, the Company’s capital stock, (e) sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, (f) change the Company’s accounting method or (g) enter into a different line of business. Furthermore, the Credit Agreements contain financial covenants, including (i) a requirement not to exceed specified levels of losses, (ii) a requirement to maintain a substantial minimum cash balance relative to the outstanding line of credit advances, which was $9.8 million as of March 31, 2017, and (iii) limitations on the Company’s annual capital expenditures. The Credit Agreements also defined an event of default to include a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, as determined by Wells Fargo. An event of default for this or any other reason, if not waived, would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Several times since entering into the Credit Agreements the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants under the credit facility. In connection with each event of noncompliance, Wells Fargo waived the event of default and, on several occasions, the Company amended the Credit Agreements in response to the default and waiver.  On June 10, 2015, the Company received from Wells Fargo a waiver of one such event of noncompliance, and as a condition of the amended Credit Agreements, the Company had restricted $5.0 million of cash equivalents as additional security for the credit facility. If the Company had not obtained the waivers and amended the Credit Agreements, the Company would not have been able to draw additional funds under the credit facility. In addition, the Company has pledged its accounts receivable, inventories, equipment, patents and other assets as collateral for its Credit Agreements, which would be subject to seizure by Wells Fargo if the Company were in default under the Credit Agreements and unable to repay the indebtedness. Wells Fargo also has the option to terminate the Credit Agreements or accelerate the indebtedness during a period of noncompliance. As of March 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in the amended Credit Agreements for Fiscal 2017. On February 7, 2017, the Company and Wells Fargo entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreements regarding the release of restricted cash and the exclusion of certain items from the financial covenant calculations.

The Company is required to maintain a Wells Fargo collection account for cash receipts on all of its accounts receivable. These amounts are immediately applied to reduce the outstanding amount on the credit facility. The floating rate for line of credit advances is the sum of daily three month London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”), which interest rate shall change whenever daily three month LIBOR changes, plus applicable margin. Based on the revolving nature of the Company’s borrowings and payments, the Company classifies all outstanding amounts as current liabilities. The applicable margin varies based on net income and the minimum interest floor is set at $66,000 each calendar quarter. The Company’s borrowing rate was 4.9% and 4.4% at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

The Company is also required to pay an annual unused line fee of one‑quarter of one percent of the daily average of the maximum line amount and 1.5% interest with respect to each letter of credit issued by Wells Fargo. These amounts, if any, are also recorded as interest expense by the Company. As of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, $11.5 million and $9.5 million in borrowings were outstanding, respectively, under the credit facility. As of March 31, 2017, approximately $6.8 million was available for additional borrowing. Interest expense related to the credit facility during each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.5 million, which includes $0.2 million in amortization of deferred financing costs.

New Credit Facility   On June 2, 2017, the Company, entered into two secured credit facilities (the “Bridge Bank Credit Agreements”) with Western Alliance Bank through its Bridge Bank division (“Bridge Bank”), with credit support provided by the Export-Import Bank of the United States through its working capital guarantee program. Under the terms of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, the Company may borrow up to $12.0 million on a revolving basis depending on, among other factors, the amount of its eligible inventory and accounts receivable. The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements are for a two-year period ending June 2, 2019. Upon closing with Bridge Bank the Company’s existing credit facilities with Wells Fargo, were paid off in full.

F-29


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Total borrowings, letter of credit obligations and the then aggregate committed amount of cash management services under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements may not exceed 85% of the sum of unrestricted cash and the amount of cash collateral held at Bridge Bank. As a condition of the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements, the Company has restricted $5.0 million of cash equivalents as additional security for the credit facility. Borrowings under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements will bear per annum interest at the prime rate plus 1.5 percent, subject to increase during the occurrence of an event of default. Obligations under the Bridge Bank Credit Agreements are secured by all of the Company’s assets, including intellectual property and general intangibles.

The Bridge Bank Credit Agreements include affirmative covenants as well as negative covenants that prohibit a variety of actions without Bridge Bank’s consent, including covenants that limit the Company’s ability to (a) incur or guarantee debt, (b) create liens, (c) enter into any merger, recapitalization or similar transaction or purchase all or substantially all of the assets or stock of another entity, or (d) sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Company’s assets. 

The financial covenants  of the domestic credit agreement with Bridge Bank (the “Domestic Facility”) requires the Company not to exceed specified levels of losses relative to its financial model and the outstanding line of credit advances may not exceed 85% of  the sum of unrestricted cash and the amount of cash collateral held at Bridge Bank. The Domestic Facility also defines an event of default to include a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. An event of default for this or any other reason, if not waived, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments

As of March 31, 2017,2020, the Company had firm commitments to purchase inventories of approximately $32.1$28.5 million through Fiscal 2020.2023. Certain inventory delivery dates and related payments are not scheduled; therefore amounts under these firm purchase commitments will be payable upon the receipt of the related inventories.

Lease Commitments

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), to require lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet, while recognition on the statement of operations will remain similar to current lease accounting. The ASU requires lessees to recognize a liability for lease obligations, which represents the discounted obligation to make future lease payments, and a corresponding right-of-use (ROU) asset on the balance sheet. The guidance requires disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements that is intended to give financial statement users the ability to assess the amount, timing and potential uncertainty of cash flows related to leases. The ASU also eliminates real estate-specific provisions and modifies certain aspects of lessor accounting.

The Company adopted the new standard on April 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. The Company has elected to apply the transition method that allows companies to continue applying the guidance under the lease standard in effect at that time in the comparative periods presented in the consolidated financial statements and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on the date of adoption. The Company also elected the “package of practical expedients”; which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs; the use of hindsight in order to calculate the lease term of existing assets; the use of the portfolio approach on similar assets; and has elected not to separate lease and non-lease assets.

Results for reporting periods beginning after April 1, 2019 are presented under the new standard, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior period. Upon adoption of the new lease standard, on April 1, 2019, the Company recorded approximately $5.5 million of right-of-use assets, adjusted for the reclassification of deferred rent and lease incentive of approximately $0.3 million, and $5.8 million of operating lease liabilities, within the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets upon adoption. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations or cash flows and did not result in a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Financed leases are not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and are therefore not included in the disclosures.

In June 2019, the Company entered into a new lease of approximately 9,216 square feet of warehouse space at 16701 Stagg Street in Van Nuys, California. Upon the lease commencement date in July 2019, the Company recorded $0.5 million of right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities.

The Company leases offices and manufacturing facilities under various non‑cancelablenon-cancelable operating leases expiring at various times through the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020.Fiscal 2025. All of the leases require the Company to pay maintenance, insurance and property taxes. The lease agreements for primary office and manufacturing facilities provide for rent escalation over the

F-30

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

lease term and renewal options for five‑yearfive-year periods. RentLease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

The difference between rentcomponents of lease expense recorded andwere as follows for the amount paid is credited or charged to deferred rent, which is included in other long‑term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The balance of deferred rent was approximately $0.2 million as each ofyear ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Rent2020 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

March 31, 2020

Operating lease cost

$

1,532

Rental expense for operating leases classified under the previous accounting standard, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 840, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 was approximately $2.3 millionmillion.

Supplemental balance sheet information related to the leases was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

March 31, 2020

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

$

5,118

Total operating lease right-of-use assets

 

$

5,118

 

 

 

 

Operating lease liability, current

 

$

443

Operating lease liability, non-current

 

 

4,941

Total operating lease liabilities

 

$

5,384

The Company records its right-of-use assets within other assets (non-current) and $2.5 million forits operating lease liabilities within current and long-term portion of notes payable and lease obligations.

Supplemental cash flow information related to the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

On July 31, 2014, the Company and Northpark Industrial (“Northpark”) entered into a Third Amendment to Lease (the “Third Amendment”) to amend the Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease - Net, dated December 1, 1999,leases was as amended (the “Lease”), pursuant to which the Company leases the premises located at 21211 Nordhoff Street, Chatsworth, California for use as primary office space, engineering testing and manufacturing. The Third Amendment extended the termfollows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended
March 31, 2020

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

    

 

Operating cash flows from operating leases

 

$

1,609

Other supplemental operating lease information consists of the Lease for a period of two months commencing on August 1, 2014 and ending on September 30, 2014 and set the monthly base rent payable by the Company under the Lease at $81,001 per month.

On September 30, 2014, the Company and Northpark entered into a Fourth Amendment to Lease (the “Fourth Amendment”) to amend the Lease by extending the term of the Lease for a period of five years commencing on October 1, 2014 and ending on September 30, 2019. The Fourth Amendment also adjusts the monthly base rent payable by the

following:

Weighted average remaining lease life

7 years

Weighted average discount rate

13%

F-30


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Company under the Lease to the following: $39,500 per month from October 1, 2014 through November 30, 2014; $79,000 per month from December 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015; $81,225 per month from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016; $83,600 per month from October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017; $86,000 per month from October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018; and $88,500 per month from October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019.  The Fourth Amendment also provides the Company with an option to extend the Lease by an additional five-year term following the expiration of the term of the Lease as amended by the Fourth Amendment and provides that Northpark will perform certain capital improvements to the leased premises’ HVAC system.

On March 28, 2013, the Company and Prologis, L.P., formerly known as AMB Property, L.P., entered into a third amendment (the “Van Nuys Third Amendment”) to the Lease Agreement dated September 25, 2000, for leased premises used by the Company for engineering testing and manufacturing located in Van Nuys, California. The Van Nuys Third Amendment extends the term of the Lease Agreement from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017. The Van Nuys Third Amendment also adjusts the monthly base rent payable by the Company under the Lease Agreement to the following: $60,000 per month from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015 and $65,000 per month from July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.

On June 7, 2017 the Company and Prologis, L.P entered into a Fourth Amendment to Lease (the “Van Nuys Fourth Amendment”) to amend the Lease by extending the term of the Lease for a period of sixty-two (62) months commencing on December 31, 2017 to February 28, 2023. The Van Nuys Fourth Amendment also adjusts the monthly base rent payable by the Company under the Lease Agreement to the following: $0 per month from January 1, 2018 through February 28, 2018; $66,846 per month from March 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018; $68,852 per month from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019; $70,917 per month from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020; $73,045 per month from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021; $75,236 per month from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022; and $77,493 per month from January 1, 2023 through February 28, 2023. The Van Nuys Fourth Amendment also provides the Company with an option to extend the Lease by an additional five year term following the expiration of the term of the Lease as amended by the Lease Amendment and provides that Prologis, L.P. will contribute a tenant improvement allowance toward the Company’s approved alterations to the premises.

At March 31, 2017,2020, the Company’s minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating

 

 

Operating

Year Ending March 31,

    

Leases

 

    

Leases

2018

 

$

1,697

 

2019

 

 

1,143

 

2020

 

 

627

 

2021

 

 

96

 

 

$

1,116

2022

 

 

96

 

 

 

1,099

2023

 

 

1,125

2024

 

 

1,153

2025

 

 

1,077

Thereafter

 

 

310

 

 

 

3,002

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

3,969

 

Total lease payments

 

$

8,572

Less: imputed interest

 

 

(3,188)

Present value of operating lease liabilities

 

$

5,384

Other Commitments

In September 2010, the Company was awarded a grant from the DOE for the research, development and testing of a more efficient microturbine CHP system. Part of the improved efficiency will come from an improved microturbine design, with a projected electrical efficiency of 42% and power output of 370 kW. The contract was over a five-year period and was completed in September 2015. The project was estimated to cost approximately $11.7 million. The DOE will contribute $5.0 million toward the project, of which $4.2 million was allocated to the Company, and the Company will incur approximately $6.7 million in research and development expense. The Company billed the DOE under the contract for this project a cumulative amount of $4.2 million through September 30, 2015, the date on which the contract was completed.

F-31


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Other Commitments

The Company has agreements with certain of its distributors requiring that if the Company renders parts obsolete in inventories the distributors own and hold in support of their obligations to serve fielded microturbines, then the Company is required to replace the affected stock at no cost to the distributors. While the Company has never incurred costs or obligations for these types of replacements, it is possible that future changes in the Company’s product technology could result and yield costs to the Company if significant amounts of inventory are held at distributors. As of March 31, 2017,2020, no significant inventories were held at distributors.

Legal Matters

Federal Securities Class Action

Two putative securities class action complaints were filed against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the following captions:  David Kinney, etc. v. Capstone Turbine, et al., No. 2:15-CV-08914 on November 16, 2015 (the “Kinney Complaint”) and Kevin M. Grooms, etc. v. Capstone Turbine, et al., No. 2:15-CV-09155 on December 18,November 25, 2015 (the “Grooms Complaint”).

The putative class in the Kinney Complaint is comprised of all purchasers of the Company’s securities between November 7, 2013 and November 5, 2015.  The Kinney Complaint allegesalleged material misrepresentations and omissions in public statements regarding BPC and the likelihood that BPC would not be able to fulfill many legal and financial obligations to the Company.us.  The Kinney Complaint also allegesalleged that the Company’sour financial statements were not appropriately adjusted in light of this situation and were not maintained in accordance with GAAP, and that the Companywe lacked adequate internal controls over accounting.  The Kinney Complaint allegesalleged that these public statements and accounting irregularities constituted violations by all named defendants of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by the individual defendants. The Grooms Complaint makesmade allegations and claims that arewere substantially identical to those in the Kinney Complaint, and both complaints seeksought compensatory damages of an undisclosed amount. On January 16, 2016, several shareholders filed motions to consolidate the Kinney and Grooms actions and for appointment as lead plaintiff.  On February 29, 2016, the Court granted the motions to consolidate, and appointed a lead plaintiff.  On May 6, 2016, a Consolidated Amended Complaint with allegations and claims substantially identical to those of the Kinney Complaint was filed in the consolidated action.  The putative class period in the Consolidated Amended Complaint iswas June 12, 2014 to November 5, 2015. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint on June 17, 2016.  On March 10, 2017, the Court issued an order granting Defendants’defendants’ motion to dismiss in its entirety with leave to amend.  Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 28, 2017.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed June 2, 2017.  Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the motion to dismiss on July 7, 2017, and defendants filed their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on July 28, 2017. The Company has not recorded any liability ascourt vacated the hearing that was scheduled for August 18, 2017.  On February 9, 2018, the Court issued an Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss.  On March 30, 2018, defendants filed an answer to the Consolidated Amended Complaint.  On May 17, 2018, the Court issued a scheduling order setting a trial date of March 31, 2017 since any potential loss is17, 2020.  On June 26, 2018, the Court entered an order vacating all deadlines through the end of October 2018 and temporarily staying formal discovery and other proceedings to allow the parties time to conduct a mediation.  The parties participated in mediation on September 24, 2018, which did not probable or reasonably estimable givenresult in a settlement.  On November 16, 2018, after further settlement discussions, the parties advised the Court that they had reached an agreement in principle to settle the action in its entirety.  The agreement in principle was subject to several conditions, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement that was satisfactory to all parties, and preliminary natureand final approval from the court, among other things.  Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking preliminary approval of the proceedings.proposed settlement on April 12, 2019, and filed supplementary declarations in support of the motion on May 2, 2019.  Preliminary approval of the settlement was granted on May 17, 2019.  On September 24, 2019, lead counsel for plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses.  On October 25, 2019, plaintiffs filed a motion for final approval of the settlement.  On November 15, 2019, the Court issued an order

F-32

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

approving the settlement and the payment of attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and class representative payments, and entering final judgment in the action.  Our insurance carrier funded the settlement amount.

Federal Individual Securities Action

An individual securities complaint was filed against us, our Chief Executive Officer, and additional unidentified defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the following caption:  FiveT Investment Management LTD, et al., v. Capstone Turbine, et al., No. 2:18-CV-03512 on April 25, 2018.  The lawsuit alleged material misrepresentations and omissions regarding our revenue, sales, and operations because of alleged improper revenue recognition and backlog calculations related to BPC.  The lawsuit alleged that these statements constituted violations by all named defendants of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by the individual defendants.  The complaint also asserted claims against all named defendants for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, violations of California Civil Code sections 1709 and 1710, and California Corporations Code sections 25400 and 25401.  Additionally, the complaint asserted a cause of action against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty.  It demanded compensatory damages for the amount of damages allegedly suffered, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and fees.

On June 29, 2018, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint for Common Law Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation.  The Amended Complaint asserted claims for common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation, against the Company, Mr. Jamison, and unidentified individual defendants.  The Amended Complaint demanded damages in an unspecified amount, plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and fees.  Defendants filed their answer to the Amended Complaint on August 17, 2018.  The parties participated in a mediation on September 24, 2018.  The mediation did not result in a settlement.  On October 12, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint, seeking to reinstate the cause of action for violation of California Civil Code section 25401.  On November 29, 2018, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend and plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint, which asserted claims for common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of California Civil Code section 25401 against the Company, Mr. Jamison, and unidentified individual defendants.  On December 20, 2018, defendants filed their answer to the Second Amended Complaint.  On June 6, 2019, the parties reached a confidential settlement of the action and the suit was dismissed with prejudice on July 1, 2019.  Our insurance carrier funded the settlement amount.

State Derivative Lawsuits — California

On February 18, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in the State of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors under the following caption:  Stesiak v. Jamison, et al., No. BC610782.  The lawsuit alleges that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants failed to timely adjust the Company’sour account receivables and backlog to reflect BPC’s inability to pay the Company.us.  The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment, that the Companywe institute corporate governance reforms, and disgorgement from the individual defendants.  On May 5, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part.  On May 10, 2016, the Court entered that proposed order.  On March 9, 2018, following the Court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in the federal securities class action, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until the close of fact discovery in the federal securities class action.  On March 20, 2018, the Court entered that proposed order.  A status conference is scheduled for July 1, 2020.

F-32F-33


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

entered that proposed order. Given that the federal securities class action was dismissed with leave to amend, this case is still stayed. A status conference is scheduled for September 20, 2017.

On June 8, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action entitled Velma Kilpatrick v. Simon, et al., No. BC623167, was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in the State of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors.  The complaint alleges that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants failed to timely adjust the Company’sour account receivables and backlog to reflect BPC’s inability to pay the Company.us.  The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties, and that the Companywe institute corporate governance reforms.  On August 23, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part.  Given thatOn March 9, 2018, following the Court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in the federal securities class action, was dismissed with leavethe parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to amend,stay this case is still stayed.action until the close of fact discovery in the federal securities class action.  On March 20, 2018 the Court entered that proposed order.  A status conference is scheduled for SeptemberJune 26, 2017.2020.

On December 27, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action entitled Andre Rosowsky v. Jamison, et al., No. 30-2016-00894859-CU-MC-CJC was filedThe parties in Orange County Superior Court in the State of California against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors. The complaint alleges that certainboth of the Company’s current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations toabove state derivative lawsuits participated in a mediation held on September 24, 2018.  On May 6, 2019, the Company, but allowed the Company to make false and misleading statementsparties reached an agreement in principle regarding BPC and the Company’s financial condition.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants failed to timely adjust the Company’s account receivables and backlog to reflect BPC’s inability to pay the Company.  The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Company as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties, that the Company institute corporate governance reforms to be implemented in settlement of the action.  The parties have not yet formalized a settlement, however, which is subject to several conditions, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement that is satisfactory to all parties and restitutionpreliminary and final approval from the individual defendants. On April 14, 2017,court, among other things.  Settlement discussions are ongoing.  We have not recorded any liability as of March 31, 2020 as our insurance carrier will fund the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On May 5, 2017, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his complaint without prejudice.settlement amount.

Federal Derivative Lawsuits

On March 7, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors under the following caption:  Haber v. Jamison, et al., No. CV16-01569-DMG (RAOx).  The lawsuit alleges that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial condition.  The complaint asserts a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty.  It demands damages for the amount of damage sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duties, and equitable relief, including that the Companywe institute appropriate corporate governance reforms.  On May 11, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part. On May 13, 2016, the Court entered that proposed order.  Given that the federal securities class action was dismissed with leave to amend, this case is still stayed.

On July 12, 2016 and July 18, 2016, respectively, two additional purported shareholder derivative actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Companyus and certain of itsour current and former officers and directors, under the caption Tuttle v. Atkinson, et al., No. CV16-05127, and Boll v. Jamison, et al., No. CV16-5282, respectively.  The lawsuits allege that certain of the Company’sour current and former officers and directors knew or should have known that BPC would be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Company,us, but allowed the Companyus to make false and misleading statements regarding BPC and the Company’sour financial

F-33


Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

condition.  The Tuttle complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, and unjust enrichment, and the Boll complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets.  Both complaints demand damages sustained by the Companyus as a result of the individual defendants’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, and equitable relief, including that the Companywe institute appropriate corporate governance reforms.  The federal derivative actions have beenwere stayed until such time as the defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the federal securities class action arewere either granted with prejudice or denied in whole or in part.  Given thatOn March 9, 2018, following the Court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in the federal securities class action, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking to stay this action until the close of fact discovery in the federal securities class action.  On March 13, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation.

F-34

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The parties in the above federal derivative lawsuits participated in a mediation held on September 24, 2018.  On May 6, 2019, the parties reached an agreement in principle regarding corporate governance reforms to be implemented in settlement of the action.  The parties have not yet formalized a settlement, however, which is subject to several conditions, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement that is satisfactory to all parties and preliminary and final approval from the court, among other things.  Settlement discussions are ongoing.  We have not recorded any liability as of March 31, 2020 as our insurance carrier will fund the settlement amount.

Capstone Turbine Corporation v. Regatta Solutions, Inc.

On August 23, 2018, we initiated arbitration proceedings against its former distributor, Regatta Solutions, Inc. (“Regatta”), with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), under the following caption: Capstone Turbine Corp. v. Regatta Solutions, Inc., Case No. 01-18-0003-0860 (the “Capstone-Regatta Arbitration”). We have alleged claims against Regatta for breach of contract and unjust enrichment relating to the parties’ prior distributor relationship, which terminated at the end of March of 2018, and the related wind-down agreement between the parties. As remedies for these claims, we are seeking compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages, along with declaratory relief and attorney’s fees, interest, and costs.  

On October 18, 2018, Regatta filed its answer and cross-claims in the Capstone-Regatta Arbitration. In its cross-claims, Regatta asserted claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, fraud, and intentional interference with contractual relations, relating to the parties’ agreement to wind-down relations and Regatta’s purported sales efforts in California. As remedies for these alleged claims, Regatta sought no less than $1.5 million in general and compensatory damages, along with punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney’s fees and costs. We have filed and served an answering statement denying Regatta’s counterclaims and asserting several affirmative defenses.

Also on October 18, 2018, Regatta filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, alleging two counts of fraud, and one count of interference with contractual relations, individually against Mr. James Crouse, then Executive Vice President of Sales for the Company, arising out of the same allegations made in Regatta’s counterclaim. As remedies for these alleged claims, Regatta again sought no less than $1.5 million in general and compensatory damages, along with punitive and exemplary damages, as well as attorney’s fees and costs. The case was filed under the caption Regatta Solutions, Inc., v. Jim Crouse, et. al., Case No. 30-2018-01026571-CU-FR-CJC. On December 14, 2018, Regatta stipulated and agreed to arbitrate its claims against Mr. James Crouse and dismissed him from the Superior Court action.

On January 16, 2019, the parties participated in a mediation that did not resolve the dispute. The parties continued their settlement discussions and held a follow-on mediation on April 24, 2019 at which point the parties came to a resolution of the matter. Following initial compliance with the settlement terms, Regatta breached its obligations thereunder and the parties thereafter resolved the continuing dispute at a further mediation on January 29, 2020. As of March 31, 2020, Regatta met all of its material obligations under the settlement terms, and all matters related to the litigation were dismissed with leaveprejudice on April 10, 2020. The settlement did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Capstone Turbine Corporation v. Turbine International, LLC.

On February 3, 2020, Capstone Turbine Corporation filed suit against its former distributor, Turbine International, LLC (“Turbine Intl.”), in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles under the following caption: Capstone Turbine Corporation v. Turbine International, LLC; Case No. 20STCV04372 (“Capstone-Turbine Intl. Litigation”). We have alleged claims against Turbine Intl. for breach of contract and for injunctive relief relating to amend,the parties’ prior distributor relationship, which terminated at the end of March of 2018, and Turbine Intl.’s failure to satisfy its payment obligations under certain financial agreements, namely an accounts receivable agreement

F-35

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

and promissory note in favor of Capstone. As remedies for these casesclaims, we are still stayed.seeking compensatory, consequential, along with injunctive relief and attorney’s fees, interest, and costs. 

On March 18, 2020, Turbine Intl. filed its answer and cross-claims in the Capstone-Turbine Intl. Litigation. In its cross-claims, Turbine Intl. has asserted claims against Capstone, and individually against Mr. James Crouse, Capstone’s Chief Revenue Officer, for breach of contract under the distributor agreement, accounts receivable agreement and promissory note, fraud, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, negligent misrepresentation, violation of the unfair practices act, violation of racketeer influenced corrupt organizations act, and conspiracy to commit fraud. As remedies for these alleged claims, Turbine Intl. are seeking compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages along with attorney’s fees, interest, and costs. Capstone answered the cross-claims on May 7, 2020. A case management conference is scheduled for August 19, 2020. We have not recorded any liability as of March 31, 2020, as the matter is too early to estimate.

13. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) profit‑sharing plan in which all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to Internal Revenue Service annual limits or, if less, 90% of their eligible compensation. Employees are fully vested in their contributions to the plan. The plan also provides for both Company matching and discretionary contributions, which are determined by the Board of Directors. The Company has been matching 50 cents on the dollar up to 6% of the employee’s contributions since February 2019. Prior to that date, the Company had been matching 50 cents on the dollar up to 4% of the employee’s contributions since October 2006. Prior to that date,There were no Company contributions had been made sinceto the inception of the plan.plan prior to October 2006. The Company’s match vests 25% a year over four years starting from the employee’s hire date. The Company recorded expense of approximately $0.3 million for each of the fiscal yearsyear ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

14. Other Current LiabilitiesAssets

The Company iswas a party to a Development and License Agreement with Carrier Corporation (“Carrier”) regarding the payment of royalties on the sale of each of the Company’s 200 kilowatt (“C200”) microturbines. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we reached our repayment threshold level and the fixed rate royalty was reduced by 50%. On July 25, 2018, the Company and Carrier entered into a Second Amendment to the Development and License Agreement (“Second Amendment”) whereby the Company agreed to pay Carrier approximately $3.0 million to conclude the Company’s current royalty obligation under the Development and License Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2007, as amended (“Development Agreement”) and release the Company from any future royalty payment obligations. The Second Amendment also removed non-compete provisions from the Development Agreement, allowing the Company to design market or sell its C200 System in conjunction with any energy system and compete with Carrier products in the CCHP market. Carrier earned $0.9  millionzero and $1.2$0.4 million in royalties for C200 and C1000 Series system sales during each of the yearfiscal years ended March 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. EarnedThere were no unpaid, earned royalties of $0.3 million and $0.2 million were unpaid as of March 31, 20172020 and March 31, 2016, respectively,2019.

On September 19, 2018, the Company paid in full the negotiated royalty settlement of $3.0 million to Carrier, and are included in accruedas such, there is no further royalty obligation to Carrier. The prepaid royalty of $3.0 million has been recorded under the captions “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.sheets and will be amortized in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations over a 15-year amortization period through September 2033 using an effective royalty rate. A 15-year amortization period is the minimum expected life cycle of the current generation of product. The effective royalty rate is calculated as the prepaid royalty settlement divided by total projected C200 System units over the 15-year amortization period. On a quarterly basis, the Company will perform a re-forecast of C200 System unit shipments, to see if a change needs to be made to the effective royalty rate. Accordingly, if the Company’s future projections change, its effective royalty rates would change, which could affect the amount and timing of royalty expense the Company recognizes. If impairment exists, then the

F-36

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

prepaid royalty asset could be written down to fair value. Prepaid royalties are classified as current assets to the extent that such amounts will be recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations within the next 12 months. The current and long-term portions of prepaid royalties, included in other current assets and other assets, respectively, consisted of (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

    

2020

    

2019

 

Other current assets

 

$

124

 

$

124

 

Other assets

 

 

2,672

 

 

2,768

 

Royalty-related assets

 

$

2,796

 

$

2,892

 

15. Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through the filing date of this Form 10-K with the SEC, to ensure that this filing includes appropriate disclosure of events both recognized in the financial statements as of March 31, 2017,2020, and events which occurred subsequently but were not recognized in the financial statements. Except as described in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 11—Revolving Credit Facility and Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies, thereThere were no other subsequent events which required recognition, adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.statements other than disclosed in this note.

SBA Paycheck Protection Program Loan

On April 15, 2020, the Company submitted an application to its banking partner Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation (“Western Alliance”) under the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program enabled by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act of 2020 (the “CARES Act”). Western Alliance entered into a Note on April 24, 2020 (the “Note”) with the Company and agreed to make available to the Company a loan in the amount of $2,610,200 (the “Loan”). The Company received the full amount of the Loan on April 24, 2020 (the “Initial Disbursement Date) and currently plans to use the proceeds to support fixed costs such as payroll costs, rent and utilities in accordance with the relevant terms and conditions of the CARES Act. On May 13, 2020, the Company repaid $660,200 of the loan in accordance with the Fourth Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement between the Company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. 

The advance under the Loan bears interest at a rate per annum of 1%. The term of the Loan is two years, ending April 24, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”).

Beginning on the seventh month following the Initial Disbursement Date, the Company is required to pay monthly principal and interest payments, with each installment payment first to pay interest accrued since the Initial Disbursement Date, then to bring principal current. The Company may adjust the payment amount periodically to amortize the principal over the remaining term of the Note.

The Loan may be forgiven partially or fully if the funding received are used for payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities, provided that at least 75% of the forgiven amount has been used for payroll costs. Forgiveness is based on the Company maintaining, or quickly rehiring employees and maintaining applicable salary levels.

Forgiveness will be reduced if full-time headcount declines, or if salaries and wages decrease. Any forgiveness of the Loan shall be subject to approval of the SBA and will require the Company and Western Alliance to apply to the SBA for such treatment in the future.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its financial statements and the accounting will largely depend on the Company’s ability to have the loan forgiven.

F-37

Table of Contents

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note Purchase and Warrant Amendments

On April 24, 2020, the Company entered into a Third Amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to the Note Purchase Agreement. Under the Third Amendment, the parties agreed to amend the Note Purchase Agreement to, among other things, carve out the Loan pursuant to the CARES Act from the negative covenants restricting the Company from incurring certain debt and the related terms and conditions as a result of such Loan.

On May 13, 2020, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Note Purchase Agreement. Under the Fourth Amendment, the parties agreed to amend the Note Purchase Agreement to amend certain repayment language with respect to the Loan pursuant to the CARES Act.

On June 16, 2020, the Company entered into a Fifth Amendment (the “Fifth Amendment”) to the Note Purchase Agreement. Under the Fifth Amendment, the Parties agreed to amend Section 6.21 of the Note Purchase Agreement to increase the Section 382 Ownership Shift (as defined therein) threshold to not exceed 42.0% until April 1, 2021, and 40% thereafter. All other provisions, terms and conditions of the Note Purchase Agreement remain in effect.

On June 16, 2020, the Company entered into an Amendment No. 2 to the Purchase Warrant for Common Shares (“Amendment No. 2”) with Special Situations Investing Group II, LLC (as successor in interest to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC) (the “Warrant Holder”) that amends that certain Purchase Warrant for Common Shares originally issued by the Company to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, dated February 4, 2019 (the “Warrant”).

Amendment No. 2 amends the first paragraph of the Warrant to decrease the number of Warrant Shares (as defined therein) issuable under the Warrant and to decrease the exercise price from $3.80 per share to $2.61 per share (the “Per Share Warrant Exercise Price”). The Company would receive aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $1,186,312.86 if the outstanding Warrant is exercised at the new Per Share Warrant Exercise Price.

Amendment No. 2 also amends Section 2.1 of the Warrant such that the Per Share Anti-Dilution Price (as defined therein) is equal to the Per Share Warrant Exercise Price as provided in the Amendment No. 2 to the Warrant. All other terms and provisions in the Warrant remain in effect.

 

 

F-34F-38


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number

Description

3.1

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Capstone Turbine Corporation(a)

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Capstone Turbine Corporation, filed October 21, 2019(b)

3.3

Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Capstone Turbine Corporation(c)

3.4

Certificate of Elimination of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Capstone Turbine Corporation, dated May 9, 2016(d)

3.5

Certificate of Designations of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Capstone Turbine Corporation(d)

4.1

Specimen stock certificate(e)

4.2

NOL Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2019, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. successor-in-interest to Computershare Inc.(f)

4.3

Form of Series A Warrant issued to investors in the April 2016 public offering(g)

4.4

Form of Pre-Funded Series B Warrant issued to investors in the April 2016 public offering(g)

4.5

Form of Series A Warrant issued to investors in the October 2016 public offering(h)

4.6

Form of Pre-Funded Series B Warrant issued to investors in the October 2016 public offering(h)

4.7

Note Purchase Agreement, date as of February 4, 2019, by and among Capstone Turbine Corporation, certain of its subsidiaries party thereto as guarantors, Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc., as purchase and any other purchasers party thereto from time to time and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc. as collateral agent (i)

4.8

Purchase Warrant for Common Shares issued in favor of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, dated February 4, 2019 (i)

4.9

Rights Agreement by and between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., dated May 6, 2019 (f)

4.10

Form of Prefunded Series C Warrant issued to investors in the September 2019 public offering (j)

4.11

Form of Series D Warrant issued to investors in the September 2019 public offering (j)

4.12

Second Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2019, by and among Capstone Turbine Corporation, certain subsidiaries of the company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group L.P. (a successor in interest to Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc.) (k)

4.13

Amendment No. 1 to the Purchase Warrant for Common Shares issued in favor of Special Situations Investing Group II, LLC (a successor in interest to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC), dated December 9, 2019 (k)

4.14

Third Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2020, by and among Capstone Turbine Corporation, certain subsidiaries of the Company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. (as successor in interest to Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc.) (l)

4.15

Note between Western Alliance Bank and Capstone Turbine Corporation, effective as of April 24, 2020 (l)

4.16

Fourth Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2020, by and among Capstone Turbine Corporation, certain subsidiaries of the Company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. (m)

4.17

Fifth Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2020, by and among Capstone Turbine Corporation, certain subsidiaries of the Company and Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. (as successor in interest to Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Holdings, Inc.) (n)

4.18

Amendment No. 2 to the Purchase Warrant for Common Shares issued in favor of Special Situations Investing Group II, LLC (as successor in interest to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC), dated June 16, 2020 (n)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description

4.19

Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

10.1

Lease between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Prologis, L.P., formerly known as AMB Property, L.P., dated September 25, 2000, as amended, for leased premises at 16640 Stagg Street, Van Nuys, California(o)

10.2

Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated June 7, 2017, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Prologis, L.P., for leased premises at 16640 Stagg Street, Van Nuys, California(p)

10.3

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan effective August 30, 2017(q)

10.4

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective August 30, 2017(r)

10.5

*

Amended and Restated Capstone Turbine Corporation Change of Control Severance Plan(s)

10.6

Development and License Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Carrier Corporation, successor-in-interest to UTC Power Corporation, dated September 4, 2007(t)

10.7

Promissory Note between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Turbine International, LLC, dated October 13, 2017(u)

10.8

Guaranty between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Hispania Petroleum, S.A., dated October 13, 2017(u)

10.9

First Amendment to the Accounts Receivable Assignment Agreement and Promissory Note between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Turbine International, LLC, dated June 5, 2018 (v)

10.10

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Performance Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective August 29, 2013(w)

10.11

*

Amendment to the Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Performance Incentive Plan, dated June 9, 2014(x)

10.12

*

Form of Inducement Stock Option Agreement(y)

10.13

*

Form of Inducement Restricted Stock Unit Agreement(y)

10.14

*

Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement with Darren R. Jamison, dated June 14, 2012(z)

10.15

*

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement with Darren R. Jamison, effective June 14, 2015(aa)

10.16

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation Severance Pay Plan as amended and restated effective February 1, 2010(aa)

10.17

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement used in the September 2019 offering (j)

10.18

At the Market Offering Agreement, dated June 7, 2018, between Capstone and H.C. Wainright & Co., LLC (bb)

10.19

Second Amendment to the Development and License Agreement, dated July 25, 2018, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Carrier Corporation (cc)

10.20

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (dd)

10.21

*

Form of Change in Control Agreement (ee)

10.22

*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Company Employees under the Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Stock Option and Incentive Plan –Four Year Vesting Schedule

10.23

*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Company Employees under the Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Stock Option and Incentive Plan –Three Year Vesting Schedule

10.24

*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Company Employees under the Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Stock Option and Incentive Plan –Two Year Vesting Schedule

10.25

*

Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Company Employees under the Capstone Turbine Corporation 2017 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

14.1

Code of Business Conduct(ff)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description

14.2

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Chief Executive Officer(ff)

21

Subsidiary List

23

Consent of Marcum LLP

24

Power of Attorney (included on the signature page of this Form 10-K)

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document


*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

(a)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, dated May 8, 2000 (File No. 333-33024).

(b)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 21, 2019 (File No. 001-15957).

(c)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 1, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).

(d)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 9, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(e)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, dated June 21, 2000 (File No. 333-33024).

(f)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 6, 2019 (File No. 001-15957).

(g)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 21, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(h)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 18, 2016 (File No. 001-15957). 

(i)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 5, 2019 (File No. 001-15957).

(j)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 4, 2019 (File No. 001-15957).

(k)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2019 (File No. 001-15957).

(l)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 29, 2020 (File No. 001-15957).

Table of Contents

(m)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 15, 2020 (File No. 001-15957).

(n)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 17, 2020 (File No. 001-15957).

(o)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-15957).

(p)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).

(q)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on July 21, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).

(r)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on July 21, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).

(s)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-15957).

(t)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (File No. 001-15957).

(u)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 13, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).

(v)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on June 7, 2018 (File No. 001-15957)

(w)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 (File No. 001-15957).

(x)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on July 16, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(y)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated June 17, 2009 (File No. 333-160049).

(z)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2012 (File No. 001-15957).

(aa)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2015 (File No. 001-15957).

(bb)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 7, 2018 (File No. 001-15957).

(cc)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 26, 2018 (File No. 001-15957).

(dd)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed July 13, 2018 (File No. 001-15957).

(ee)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2018 (File No. 001-15957).

Table of Contents

(ff)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

 

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

Date: June 13, 201726, 2020

 

By:

 

/s/ Jayme L. BrooksFrederick S. Hencken III

 

    

 

 

Jayme L. Brooks
Frederick S. Hencken III
Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Capstone Turbine Corporation, hereby severally constitute Darren R. Jamison and Jayme L. Brooks,Frederick S. Hencken III, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, this Annual Report on Form 10‑K and any and all amendments to said Form 10‑K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Capstone Turbine Corporation to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10‑K and any and all amendments thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

    

Title

    

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Darren R. Jamison

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Darren R. Jamison

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Jayme L. BrooksFrederick S. Hencken III

 

Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Jayme L. BrooksFrederick S. Hencken III

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Holly A. Van Deursen

 

ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Holly A. Van Deursen

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Paul DeWeese

 

Director

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Paul DeWeese

/s/  Robert C. Flexon

Director

June 26, 2020

Robert C. Flexon

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Yon Y. Jorden

 

Director

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Yon Y. Jorden

/s/ Noam Lotan

Director

June 13, 2017

Noam Lotan

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Gary J. Mayo

 

Director

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Gary J. Mayo

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Eliot G. ProtschRobert F. Powelson

 

Director

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Eliot G. ProtschRobert F. Powelson

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Gary D. SimonDenise Wilson

 

Director

 

June 13, 201726, 2020

Gary D. SimonDenise Wilson

F-35


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

 

 

Exhibit
Number

Description

2.1

Asset Purchase Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Calnetix Power Solutions, Inc., dated February 1, 2010(a)

2.2

Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Calnetix Power Solutions, Inc., dated March 31, 2011(b)

2.3

Second Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Calnetix Power Solutions, Inc., dated April 28, 2011(b)

3.1

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Capstone Turbine Corporation(c)

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Capstone Turbine Corporation, filed November 6, 2015(d)

3.3

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Capstone Turbine Corporation(e)

3.4

Certificate of Elimination of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, dated May 9, 2016(f)

3.5

Certificate of Designations of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Capstone Turbine Corporation(f)

3.6

Specimen stock certificate(g)

3.7

Rights Agreement, dated July 7, 2005, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Mellon Investor Services LLC(n)

3.8

Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated July 3, 2008, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Mellon Investor Services LLC(i)

3.9

Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement, dated June 9, 2011, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Mellon Investor Services LLC(b)

4.1

Amendment No. 3 to Rights Agreement, dated July 1, 2014, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Computershare Inc. as successor-in-interest to Mellon Investor Services LLC(j)

4.2

Amendment No. 4 to Rights Agreement, dated August 5, 2014, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Computershare Inc. as successor-in-interest to Mellon Investor Services LLC(k)

4.3

Amendment No. 5 to Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2016, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Computershare Inc. as successor-in-interest to Mellon Investor Services LLC(m)

4.4

NOL Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2016, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Computershare Inc.(m)

4.5

Form of Series A Warrant issued to investors in the April 2016 public offering(l)

4.6

Form of Pre-Funded Series B Warrant issued to investors in the April 2016 public offering(l)

4.7

Form of Series A Warrant issued to investors in the October 2016 public offering(rr)

4.8

Form of Pre-Funded Series B Warrant issued to investors in the October 2016 public offering(rr)

10.1

Amended and Restated License Agreement, dated August 2, 2000, by and between Solar Turbines Incorporated and Capstone Turbine Corporation(m)

10.2

Transition Agreement, dated August 2, 2000, by and between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Solar Turbines Incorporated(m)

10.3

Lease between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Northpark Industrial—Leahy Division LLC, dated December 1, 1999, as amended, for leased premises at 21211 Nordhoff Street, Chatsworth, California(n)


Table of Contents

 

 

Exhibit
Number

Description

10.4

Third Amendment to Lease, dated July 31, 2014, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Northpark Industrial, for leased premises at 21211 Nordhoff Street, Chatsworth, California(k)

10.5

Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated September 30, 2014, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Northpark Industrial, for leased premises at 21211 Nordhoff Street, Chatsworth, California(o)

10.6

Lease between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Prologis, L.P., formerly known as AMB Property, L.P., dated September 25, 2000, as amended, for leased premises at 16640 Stagg Street, Van Nuys, California(p)

10.7

Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated June 7, 2017, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Prologis, L.P., for leased premises at 16640 Stagg Street, Van Nuys, California

10.8

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective August 30, 2012(q)

10.9

*

Amendment to the Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, effective August 27, 2015(r)

10.10

*

Form of Stock Option Agreement for Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan(s)

10.11

*

Form of Stock Bonus Agreement for Capstone Turbine Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan(t)

10.12

*

Amended and Restated Capstone Turbine Corporation Change of Control Severance Plan(u)

10.13

Development and License Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Carrier Corporation, successor-in-interest to UTC Power Corporation, dated September 4, 2007(v)

10.14

First Amendment to the Development and License Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Carrier Corporation, successor-in-interest to UTC Power Corporation, dated January 14, 2011(b)

10.15

Business Financing Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Western Alliance Bank, dated June 2, 2017(tt)

10.16

Export-Import Bank of the United States Working Capital Guarantee Program—Borrower Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Western Alliance Bank, dated June 2, 2017(tt)

10.17

Intellectual Property Security Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Western Alliance Bank, dated June 2, 2017(tt)

10.18

Credit and Security Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated February 9, 2009 (Domestic Facility)(w)

10.19

Credit and Security Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated February 9, 2009 (Ex-Im Subfacility)(w)

10.20

First Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 9, 2009(w)

10.21

Second Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated November 5, 2009(x)

10.19

Third Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 11, 2010(t)

10.20

Fourth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 29, 2010(y)

10.21

Fifth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated November 9, 2010(z)


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description

10.22

Sixth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated March 23, 2011(aa)

10.23

Seventh Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 9, 2011(b)

10.24

Eighth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated September 27, 2011(bb)

10.25

Ninth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated February 8, 2012(cc)

10.26

Tenth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 12, 2012(dd)

10.27

Eleventh Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 7, 2013(p)

10.28

Waiver of Defaults between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated April 25, 2014(ee)

10.29

Twelfth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 9, 2014(ff)

10.30

Letter Agreement, dated September 16, 2014, between by and between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA(gg)

10.31

Thirteenth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements and Waiver of Default between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated November 3, 2014(hh)

10.32

Fourteenth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements, Waiver of Default and Consent between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 10, 2015(ii)

10.33

Fifteenth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements, Waiver of Default and Consent between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated November 2, 2015(jj)

10.34

Sixteenth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated June 7, 2016(nn)

10.35

Seventeenth Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreements, between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, dated February 7, 2017(ss)

10.36

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Performance Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective August 29, 2013(kk)

10.37

*

Amendment to the Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Performance Incentive Plan, dated June 9, 2014(ll)

10.38

*

Letter Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Darren R. Jamison, dated December 1, 2006 (mm)

10.39

*

Amendment to Letter Agreement between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Darren R. Jamison, effective April 8, 2009(w)

10.40

*

Form of Inducement Stock Option Agreement(oo)

10.41

*

Form of Inducement Restricted Stock Unit Agreement(oo)

10.42

*

Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement with Darren R. Jamison, dated June 14, 2012(dd)

10.43

*

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement with Darren R. Jamison, effective June 14, 2015(ii)


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Description

10.44

Underwriting Agreement dated May 1, 2014 by and between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Cowen and Company, LLC, as representative of the several underwriters(pp)

10.45

*

Capstone Turbine Corporation Severance Pay Plan as amended and restated effective February 1, 2010(ii)

10.46

Sales Agreement, dated August 28, 2015, by and between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Cowen & Company, LLC(qq)

10.47

Underwriting Agreement dated April 19, 2016 by and between Capstone Turbine Corporation and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as representative of the several underwriters(l)

10.48

Placement Agent Agreement by and between the Company and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as representative of the placement agents named therein, dated October 18, 2016(rr)

10.49

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement used in the October 2016 offering (rr)

14.1

Code of Business Conduct(ee)

14.2

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Chief Executive Officer(ee)

21

Subsidiary List

23.1

Consent of Marcum LLP

23.2

Consent of KPMG LLP

24

Power of Attorney (included on the signature page of this Form 10-K)

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document


*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

(a)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 5, 2010 (File No. 001-15957).

(b)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (File No. 001-15957).

(c)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, dated May 8, 2000 (File No. 333-33024).

(d)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 6, 2015 (File No. 001-15957).

(e)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 13, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).

 


Table of Contents

(f)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 6, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(g)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, dated June 21, 2000 (File No. 333-33024).

(h)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 8, 2005 (File No. 001-15957).

(i)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 10, 2008 (File No. 001-15957).

(j)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 2, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(k)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 5, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(l)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 21, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(m)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 16, 2000 (File No. 001-15957). 

(n)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 2, 2009 (File No. 001-15957).

(o)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 6, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(p)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-15957).

(q)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on July 17, 2012 (File No. 001-15957).

(r)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on July 15, 2015 (File No. 001-15957).

(s)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 001-15957).

(t)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (File No. 001-15957).

(u)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 001-15957).

(v)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (File No. 001-15957).

(w)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (File No. 001-15957).


Table of Contents

(x)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (File No. 001-15957).

(y)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 1, 2010 (File No. 001-15957).

(z)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 12, 2010 (File No. 001-15957).

(aa)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 25, 2011 (File No. 001-15957).

(bb)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 3, 2011 (File No. 001-15957).

(cc)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-15957).

(dd)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2012 (File No. 001-15957).

(ee)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(ff)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 10, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(gg)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 19, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(hh)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(ii)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2015 (File No. 001-15957).

(jj)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015 (File No. 001-15957).

(kk)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 (File No. 001-15957).

(ll)

Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on July 16, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(mm)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 001-15957).

(nn)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(oo)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated June 17, 2009 (File No. 333-160049).


Table of Contents

(pp)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 1, 2014 (File No. 001-15957).

(qq)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 28, 2015 (File No. 001-15957).

(rr)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 18, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(ss)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016 (File No. 001-15957).

(tt)

Incorporated by reference to Capstone Turbine Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 7, 2017 (File No. 001-15957).