Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022

or

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-33288

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

06-118540006-1185400
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1020 West Park Avenue, Kokomo, Indiana
(Address of principal executive offices)

46904-901346904-9013
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (765) (765456-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $.001$0.001 per share

HAYN

The NASDAQ GlobalStock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownwell-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes     No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes     No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes     No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-TS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes     No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-acceleratedNon-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting Company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.   Yes     No

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-212b-2 of the Act). Yes No

As of March 31, 2017,2022, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant was $339,017,581$373,488,556 based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination forthat any such person is an affiliate of the registrant and there may be other purposes.persons who are affiliates.

12,509,75712,521,087 shares of Haynes International, Inc. common stock were outstanding as of November 16, 2017.14, 2022.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held February 28, 2018 have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

report.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

Part I

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

15

18

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

26

33

Item 2.

Properties

27

33

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

28

34

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

28

34

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

29

35

Item 6.6.

Selected Financial DataReserved

30

36

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

32

36

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

47

50

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

48

51

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

81

88

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

81

88

Item 9B.

Other Information

81

88

Part IIIItem 9C.

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

89

Item 10.Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

82

90

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

82

90

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

82

90

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

82

90

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

83

91

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

84

92

Index to ExhibitsItem 16.

85

Form 10-K Summary

94

Signatures

87

95

1


Table of Contents

This Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K contains statements that constitute “forward‑looking“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding market and industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position, made in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K are forward‑looking.forward-looking. In many cases, you can identify forward‑lookingforward-looking statements by terminology, such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. The forward‑lookingforward-looking information may include, among other information, statements concerning the Company’s outlook for fiscal year 20182023 and beyond, overall volume and pricing trends, cost reduction strategies and their anticipated results, market and industry trends, capital expenditures, and dividends.  There may also be other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Readers are cautioned that any such forward‑lookingforward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those risk factors set forth in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward‑lookingforward-looking statements as a result of various factors, risks and uncertainties many of which are beyond the Company’s control.

The Company has based these forward‑lookingforward-looking statements on its current expectations and projections about future events.  Although the Company believes that the assumptions on which the forward‑lookingforward-looking statements contained herein are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. As a result, the forward‑lookingforward-looking statements based upon those assumptions also could be incorrect. Risks and uncertainties may affect the accuracy of forward‑looking statements.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward‑lookingforward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.otherwise.

2


Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1.  BusinessBusiness

Overview

Haynes International, Inc. (“Haynes”, “the Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is one of the world’s largest developers, producers, of high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt‑based alloys in flat product form such as sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company is focused on developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributingdistributors of technologically advanced high‑performance alloys,high-performance nickel- and cobalt-based alloys.  The Company’s products, which are sold primarily ininto the aerospace, chemical processing and industrial gas turbine industries. The Company’s productsindustries, consist of high‑temperaturehigh-temperature resistant alloys, or HTA(“HTA”) products, and corrosion‑resistantcorrosion-resistant alloys, or CRA(“CRA”) products. HTA products are used by manufacturers of equipment that is subjected to extremely high temperatures, such as jet engines for the aerospace market, gas turbine engines used for power generation and waste incineration, and industrial heating equipment. CRA products are used in applications that require resistance to very corrosive media found in chemical processing, power plant emissions control and hazardous waste treatment. Management believes Haynes is one of the principal producers of high‑performancehigh-performance alloy flat productssales in sheet, coil and plate forms, and sales of these forms, in the aggregate, represented approximately 59%62% of net product revenues in fiscal 2017.2022. The Company also produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars, which represented approximately 13% of fiscal 2022 net product revenues and in wire form, which represented approximately 7% of fiscal 2022 net product revenues.  The Company also produces its products in slab, bar and billet form and wire forms.sales of these forms, in the aggregate, represented approximately 18% of fiscal 2022 net product revenues.

The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Arcadia, Louisiana; and Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Kokomo facility specializes in flat products, the Arcadia facility specializes in tubular products, and the Mountain Home facility specializes in wire products. The Company’s products are sold primarily through its direct sales organization, which includes 1311 service and/or sales centers in the United States, Europe and Asia. All of these centers are Company‑operated. During fiscal 2017, the lessor of the Company’s existing LaPorte, Indiana facility built an adjacent facility to the Company’s requirements and the Company announced that it is relocating its Lebanon, Indiana operations into the new LaPorte facility.Company-operated. In fiscal 2017,2022, approximately 76%74% of the Company’s net revenue was generated by its direct sales organization, and the remaining 24%26% was generated by a network of independent distributors, resellers and sales agents that supplement itsthe Company’s direct sales efforts primarily in the United States, Europe and Asia, some of whom have been associated with the Company for over 30 years.

A key strength of the Company is innovation through developing new alloys and developing new applications for its new and existing alloys.  This strength combined with our unique business model that utilizes both the mill and Company-owned service centers provides exceptional customer service with short lead times, smaller quantities and value-add cutting operations.  The Company has leveraged these strengths with a focused strategy of providing high-value differentiated products and services, and variable cost reductions.  This has resulted in a 25% reduction in our volume breakeven point, which is providing incremental margin strength as volumes rise.

Available Information

The address of the Company’s website is www.haynesintl.com. The Company provides a link to its reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on its website as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The filings available on the Company’s website date back to February 3, 2011. For all filings made prior to that date, the Company’s website includes a link to the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, where such filings are available. Information contained or referenced on the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into, and does not form a part of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K. For a statement of the Company’s profits and losses and total assets, please see the financial statements of the Company included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K.

Business Strategy

The Company’s strategy is pursued within the overarching goal is to grow its business by increasing revenues, profitability and cash flow while continuingof safety, which continues to be its customers’ provider of choice for high‑the Company’s core priority.  Our approach to safety includes providing leadership on safety awareness, communication, accountability, and process change.  In addition to our ongoing focus on safety, the Company, continues to improve our business performance, alloys and value-added processes. The Company pursues this goal by analyzing capital allocation alternatives while simultaneously taking advantage of its expert technical abilities in delivering innovativeincluding providing high-value differentiated products and services along with relentlessly pursuing reduced

3

Table of Contents

variable costs, with the result being expansion of our gross margin percentage and a significant reduction in our breakeven point.

Our business metrics improved significantly in fiscal 2022, including a 25% reduction in our volume breakeven point from roughly 5 million pounds shipped to 3.7 million pounds shipped per quarter with the current product mix.  This lower breakeven point has provided favorable incremental gross margin leverage with increasing volumes in the second half of fiscal 2022 and is anticipated to continue.  

While maintaining this improvement focus, the Company continues to evaluate new opportunities and applications combinedfor its products, particularly in its core markets of aerospace, chemical processing and industrial gas turbines, but also in the areas of renewable clean energy sources and other developing technologies relating to environmental and climate change issues. These opportunities include new generation jet engines with its niche manufacturingbetter fuel efficiency and value-added service capabilitiesfewer emissions, as well as the use or consideration for use of HAYNES® alloys in advanced ultra-supercritical power plants, concentrated solar power, fuel cells, molten salt, nuclear reactors, waste-to-energy, hydrogen production, and use of supercritical-CO2 power cycles for energy generation.  Innovation is a foundational strength of the Company.

The following provides further discussion on certain focus initiatives that are core to penetrate end markets.this strategy.

·

Ensure the Company is compensated for the high-value differentiated products and services it provides. The Company favorably adjusted pricing year-over-year; which is expected to continue as additional agreements are renewed. These price increases are in addition to raw material price increases and contribute to improving margins.  The Company is also focused on price increases to offset inflationary increases in the Company’s costs.

Optimize processes to reduce costs. The Company is pursuing operational improvements, which include specific variable cost reduction projects. This ongoing pursuit includes initiatives in many different areas such as material management, productivity enhancements, yield and efficiency improvements and process optimization.  These cost reductions are sustainable and expected to have a larger favorable impact with increasing volumes.
Increase revenues by inventing new alloys, developing new applications for existing alloys and expanding into new markets. The Company believes that it is thean industry leader in developinginventing new alloys designed to meet its customers’the specialized and demanding requirements.requirements of the markets we serve. The Company continues to work closely with customers and end users of its products to identify opportunities to develop and manufacture and test new high‑performancehigh-performance alloys. Since fiscal 2003, theThe Company’s technical programs have yielded ninemany new proprietary alloys with multiple applications, an accomplishment that the Company believes distinguishes it from its competitors. The Company expects continued emphasis on product innovation to yield similar future results.

3


Developing new applications for its new and existing alloys is also a key strength and strategy of the Company. The Company leverages its technical expertise to finddevelop unique applications for its products, especially proprietary and specialty alloys that can yield higher margins.

Developing additional markets is a key strategyThese new applications, including use in unique special projects and new programs, are an important part of the Company.  Company’s growth and profitability strategy.

Through development of new alloys and new applications, for existing alloys, the Company is seeking to developparticipate in additional markets which will generatewith new revenue streams beyond the core markets of aerospace, chemical processing and industrial gas turbine industries.turbines. The Company believes that synthetic natural gas, renewable energy (such as solar), fuel cells, clean-coal, waste-to-energy, oil and gas, flue‑gas desulfurization in China, automotive,medical/pharmaceutical, consumer electronics, heat treatment, medicalpetrochemical and emerging technologies such as renewable and clean energy, hydrogen production and next-generation nuclear industriespower generation all present possible significant growth opportunities for its products.

·

Increase revenues and provide additional product and service differentiation by providing value‑addedvalue-added processing services and leveraging ourthe Company’s global distribution network.The Company believes that its network of Company-owned service and sales centers throughout North America,the United States, Europe and Asia distinguishes it from its competitors, many of whom operate only mills. The Company’s service and sales centers enable it to develop close customer relationships through direct interaction with customers and to

4

respond to customer orders quickly, while also providing value‑addedvalue-added cutting services such as laser, plasma and water-jet cutting. These services allow the Company’s customers to minimize their processing costs and outsource non‑corenon-core activities.
Increasing market share by leveraging its unique business model. Haynes is both a mill and a service center.  This business model focuses on superior customer service and allows for mill flexibility and value-added services for the customer as described above.  The Company’s strategy leverages this differentiator to grow market share, as reflected by its above-average growth rates.    
Continue to expand the Company’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives. The Company is committed to a culture of openness, trust and integrity in all aspects of its business. These high standards governing business conduct are for the good of the Company, its employees, its shareholders and its customers.  The Company has a number of policies in place governing ethical conduct and believes that all people should be treated with respect in an inclusive and diverse environment.  In addition, the Company has always been conscious of its environmental impact and is actively working to lighten its carbon footprint. As part of our environmental impact reduction efforts, we completed a solar power project at our North Carolina facility that is providing over 50% of the electricity needed to power that facility.  Another important ESG consideration is the customers’ use of the Company’s rapid response timeproducts. Ever-increasing demand for more efficient, cleaner and enhanced processing servicesrenewable energy by businesses aligned with ESG principles has led to the development of several emerging technologies that require high-performance alloys for demanding operating conditions, making Haynes’ products shipped from its service and sales centers offers the opportunity for the Companyan integral part of many energy solutions designed to providebe more timely service to its customers.

environmentally friendly.

·

Capitalize on strategic equipment investment and optimize our processes with lean manufacturing improvements.  investment. The Company expects to continue to improve operations through ongoingreturn on investment from capital investmentinvested in manufacturing facilities and equipment including information technology and utilizing six sigma and lean manufacturing process improvements. Ongoing investment in equipment has significantly improved the Company’s operations by increasing capacity, reducing unplanned downtime and manufacturing costs, and improving product quality and working capital management.equipment. Management believes that the Company’s capital investments will enable it to continue to satisfy long‑term customer demand for value‑added products that meet increasingly precise specifications. For additional discussion of capital spending, see “Summary of Capital Spending” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

value-added products.

·

Expand product capabilityIncrease profitability through strategic acquisitions and alliances.The Company willintends to continue to examine opportunities that enable it to offer customers an enhanced and more competitive product line to complement its core flat products.enhance shareholder value. These opportunities may include product line enhancement andadditions, market expansion opportunities.opportunities or other commercial or cost synergies. The Company will also plans to continue to evaluate strategic relationships with third parties in the industry in order to enhance its competitive position and relationships with customers.

Focus on eliminating the U.S. Pension Liability.  The Company also established strategies to de-risk the U.S. pension plan and strive to decrease and eventually eliminate the associated liability, which was the largest liability on its balance sheet two years ago.  The U.S. Pension net liability was $105 million at the beginning of fiscal 2021 and decreased to $21 million at the end of fiscal 2022; a drop of $84 million over the two-year period.  This strategy included a lump-sum contribution of $15 million into the plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021 in addition to normal contributions of $6 million in fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022. A glide path was adopted in fiscal 2021 to help secure funding improvements including a customized Liability-driven investing (LDI) strategy designed to reduce interest rate risk and equity risk.  At the end of fiscal 2022, the plan’s funding percentage was approximately 91%.  

5

·

Continue to expand the maintenance, repair and overhaul business.  Optimize its allocation of capital.The Company believes that its maintenance, repairbest use of capital can differ significantly in times when the markets that we serve are in a high growth period as opposed to when those markets are soft or in decline.  We will focus on cash generation in times when the backlog is level or in decline and overhaul,allocate that capital towards debt reduction, pension funding or MRO, business serves ashare re-purchases.  Conversely, in periods of high growth expected over the following year, capital is allocated towards inventory builds to support the growing market and represents both an expanding and recurring revenue stream. Products usedbacklog.   The Company continues to reinvest in the Company’s end markets require periodic replacement duebusiness with capital expenditures as well as a consistent dividend returned to the extreme environments in which they are used, which drives demand for recurring MRO work. The Company intends to continue to leverage the capabilities of its service and sales centers to respond quickly to its customers’ time‑sensitive MRO needs to develop new and retain existing business opportunities.

shareholders.

Company History

The Company was founded in 1912 as Haynes Stellite Works by American inventor and entrepreneur Elwood Haynes in Kokomo, Indiana. Since its founding, the Company has continuously conducted its main operations in Kokomo, Indiana. The Company was owned for much of its history by corporate parents, including Union Carbide and Cabot Corporation, until purchased in 1989 and then again in 1997 by private equity firms. The debt incurred in the last leveraged buy‑out ultimately forced the Company into bankruptcy in March 2004, from which it emerged five months later in August 2004.

4


The Company began operations in its tubular facility in Arcadia, Louisiana over 30 years ago. This facility and the Company’s tubular product business have grown with additional investment over time. The Company operates service centers in the U.S. that include value-added operations with laser, water-jet and plasma cutting.  The Company also acquired a stainless steel and high‑temperature alloy wire company located in Mountain Home, North Carolina in 2005. The Company primarily produces high‑performance alloy wire at that facility.  Most recently, in January 2015, the Company acquired assets in LaPorte, Indiana enabling coil stretching, leveling, slitting and cut-to-length operations.  The Laporte operation also includes a toll processing business.  In addition, the Company has expanded globally with service center locations in the United Kingdom, Switzerland and China and other sales offices in France, Japan, Singapore and Italy.

In March 2007, the Company completed a public equity offering, and simultaneously the Company listed its common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market. The Company began paying a dividend in fiscal 2010 and raised the dividend at the beginning of fiscal 2012.

Products

The global specialty alloy market consists of three primary sectors:includes stainless steel, titanium alloys, general-purpose nickel alloys and high‑performance nickel‑high-performance nickel- and cobalt‑basedcobalt-based alloys. The Company believes that the high‑performancehigh-performance alloy sector represents less than 10% of the total alloy market. The Company competes primarily in the high‑performance nickel‑high-performance nickel- and cobalt‑basedcobalt-based alloy sectors, which includes HTA products and CRA products. In each year of fiscal 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, HTA products accounted for approximately 76%81%, 81%75% and 81%79% of the Company’s net revenues, respectively; and sales of the Company’s CRA products accounted for approximately 24%19%, 19%25% and 19%21% of the Company’s net revenues, respectively.revenues.  These percentages are based on data which include revenue associated with sales by the Company to its foreign subsidiaries, but exclude revenue associated with sales by foreign subsidiaries to their customers. Management believes, however, that the effect of including revenue data associated with sales by its foreign subsidiaries would not materially change the percentages presented in this section.

High‑temperatureHigh-temperature Resistant Alloys.  HTA products are used primarily in manufacturing components for the hot sections of gas turbine engines. Stringent safety and performance standards in the aerospace industry result in development lead times typically as long as eight to ten years in the introduction of new aerospace‑relatedaerospace-related market applications for HTA products. However, once a particular new alloy is shown to possess the properties required for a specific application in the aerospace market, it tends to remain in use for extended periods. HTA products are also used in gas turbine engines produced for use in applications such as naval and commercial vessels, electric power generation, power sources for offshore drilling platforms, gas pipeline booster stations and emergency standby power generators.  The following table

5


sets forth information with respect to the Company’s significant high‑temperature resistant alloys, applications and features (new HTA development is discussed below under “Patents and Trademarks”):

Alloy and Year Introduced

End Markets and Applications(1)

Features

HAYNES® HR‑160® alloy (1990)(2)

Waste incineration/CPI‑boiler tube shields

Good resistance to sulfidation at high temperatures

HAYNES 242® alloy (1990)

Aero‑seal rings

High strength, low expansion and good fabricability

HAYNES HR‑120® alloy (1990)

IGT‑cooling shrouds

Good strength‑to‑cost ratio as compared to competing alloys

HAYNES 230® alloy (1984)

Aero/IGT‑ducting, combustors

Excellent combination of strength, stability, oxidation-resistance and fabricability

HAYNES 214® alloy (1981)(2)

Aero‑honeycomb seals

Excellent combination of oxidation resistance and fabricability among nickel‑based alloys

HAYNES 188 alloy (1968)

Aero‑burner cans, after‑burner components

High strength, oxidation resistant cobalt‑based alloy

HAYNES 625 alloy (1964)

Aero/CPI‑ducting, tanks, vessels, weld overlays

Good fabricability and general corrosion resistance

HAYNES 617 alloy (1999)

Aero/IGT—ducting, combustors

Good combination of strength, stability, oxidation resistance and fabricability

HAYNES 263 alloy (1960)

Aero/IGT‑components for gas turbine hot gas exhaust pan

Good ductility and high strength at temperatures up to 1600°F

HAYNES 718 alloy (1955)

Aero‑ducting, vanes, nozzles

Weldable, high-strength alloy with good fabricability

HASTELLOY® X alloy (1954)

Aero/IGT‑burner cans, transition ducts

Good high-temperature strength at relatively low cost

HAYNES 25 alloy (1950)(2)

Aero‑gas turbine parts, bearings, and various industrial applications

Excellent strength, good oxidation resistance to 1800°F

HAYNES 282® alloy (2005)

Aero/IGT components

Excellent high temperature strength, weldability and fabricability

HAYNES 244®  alloy (2013)

Aero/IGT components

High strength to 1400°F and low thermal expansion


(1)

“Aero” refers to the aerospace industry; “IGT” refers to the industrial gas turbine industry; “CPI” refers to the chemical processing industry.

(2)

Represents a product which the Company believes has limited competition.

Corrosion‑resistant Alloys.  CRA products are used in a variety of applications, such as chemical processing, power plant emissions control, hazardous waste treatment, sour gas production and pharmaceutical vessels. Historically, the chemical processing market has represented the largest end‑user sector for CRA products. Due to maintenance, safety and environmental considerations, the Company believes this market continues to represent an area of potential long‑term growth. In addition to the use of the CRA products in the chemical and petrochemical processing industry, the Company has seen an increased demand for some of these alloys in applications such as gas-to-liquid and synthetic gas. For improved efficiency within relevant applications, higher operating temperatures and harsher environmental conditions are required and, as a consequence, high-temperature, corrosion-resistant alloys are used. Some of our HTA products offer excellent resistance to oxidation, sulfidation, metal dusting and other high-temperature degradation modes. The Company expects this area of the chemical and petrochemical industry to represent potential long-term growth opportunities for the HTA products.

Corrosion-resistant Alloys.  CRA products are used in a variety of applications, such as chemical and petrochemical processing, power plant emissions control, hazardous waste treatment, sour gas production and pharmaceutical vessels. Historically, the chemical processing market has represented the largest end-user sector for CRA products. Due to maintenance, safety and environmental considerations, the Company believes this market continues to represent an area of potential long-term growth. In addition to the use of CRA products in the chemical and petrochemical processing industry, the Company has seen an increased demand for some of these alloys in applications such as gas-to-liquid and synthetic gas operations. For improved efficiency within relevant applications, higher operating temperatures and harsher environmental conditions are required and, as a consequence, high-temperature, corrosion-resistant alloys are used.  Unlike aerospace applications within the HTA product market, the development of new market applications for CRA products generally does not require long lead times. The following table sets forth information with respect to certain

Material Resources

6


of the Company’s significant corrosion‑resistant alloys, applications and features (new CRA development is discussed below under “Patents and Trademarks”):

Alloy and Year Introduced

End Markets and Applications(1)

Features

HASTELLOY C‑2000® alloy (1995)(2)

CPI‑tanks, mixers, piping

Versatile alloy with good resistance to uniform corrosion

HASTELLOY B‑3® alloy (1994)(2)

CPI‑acetic acid plants

Better fabrication characteristics compared to other nickel‑molybdenum alloys

HASTELLOY D‑205® alloy (1993)(2)

CPI‑plate heat exchangers

Corrosion resistance to hot concentrated sulfuric acid

ULTIMET® alloy (1990)(2)

CPI‑pumps, valves

Wear and corrosion resistant nickel‑based alloy

HASTELLOY C‑22® alloy (1985)

CPI/FGD‑tanks, mixers, piping

Resistance to localized corrosion and pitting

HASTELLOY G‑30® alloy (1985)(2)

CPI‑tanks, mixers, piping

Alloy with good corrosion resistance in phosphoric acid

HASTELLOY G‑35® alloy (2004)(2)

CPI‑tanks, heat exchangers, piping

Improved corrosion resistance to phosphoric acid with excellent resistance to corrosion in highly oxidizing media

HASTELLOY C‑276 alloy (1968)

CPI/FGD/oil and gas tanks, mixers, piping

Broad resistance to many environments

HASTELLOY C‑22HS® alloy (2003)(3)

Oil & Gas/Marine tubular, shafts, fasteners

Combines very high strength with excellent corrosion resistance and toughness


(1)

“CPI” refers to the chemical processing industry; “FGD” refers to the flue gas desulfurization industry.

(2)

Represents a patented product or a product which the Company believes has limited or no significant competition.

(3)

Patent filing date.

Patents and Trademarks

The Company currently maintains a total of approximately 2420 published U.S. patents and applications and approximately 236272 foreign counterpart patents and applications targeted at countries with significant or potential markets for the patented products. Since fiscal 2003, the Company’s technical programs have yielded nine new proprietary alloys, six of which are currently commercially available and three of which are being scaled‑up to be brought to market.alloys. The alloys being commercialized saw significant further advancement in the process during fiscal 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017. HAYNES 282 alloy, which management believes2022. The Company will havecontinue to actively promote its new alloys through customer engineering visits, technical presentations and papers.

6

In the aerospace, industrial gas turbine and high temperature markets, one of the alloys that has already seen significant commercial potential for the Company in the long term,success is the subject of a U.S. patent issued in 2011. HAYNES® 282® alloy. This alloy has an excellent combination of high temperature strength, formability fabricability and forgeability. The commercial launch of HAYNES 282 alloy occurred in October 2005 and, since that time, therefabricability. There have been a significant number of customer tests and evaluations of this product for the hot sections of gas turbines in the aerospace and industrial gas turbine markets, as well asand for automotive and other high‑high temperature applications. The alloy has already been specified into major aerospace and industrial gas turbine components. The Companyapplications, as well as for certain high temperature components in the automotive and industrial applications.  ASME code case for this alloy was recently approved, which will continue to actively promote HAYNES 282 alloy through customer engineering visitshelp further expand the use for pressure vessel and technical presentations and papers.boiler applications requiring such approvals. Another new alloy for use in the aerospace and industrial gas turbine markets is HAYNES® 244 alloy (U.S. patent filed in 2012 and granted in 2013).® alloy. It combines high strength to 1400 degrees Fahrenheit with a low coefficient of thermal expansion.  Commercialization is ongoing for this alloy, and it has recently been specified into a majorcertain aerospace component.engine programs and is being evaluated on others.

In the chemical processing industry and corrosion resistance markets, customers have found extensive applications for HASTELLOY G‑35® G-35® alloy, particularly in wet phosphoric acid production. Management expects demand for this alloy will continue to grow. Commercialization of HASTELLOY C‑22HS alloy has also continued, and the alloy has already found applications in the oil and gas industry. Testing, evaluation and promotion of this alloy is ongoing with special emphasis on applications for

7


this industry. The Company believes that its alloys (particularly HAYNES 282 alloy) are being commercialized rapidly when compared to historical trends for other proprietary alloys introduced by the Company. Commercialization is also ongoing for HASTELLOY HYBRID‑BC1® alloy and HAYNES HR-224 HYBRID-BC1® alloy. HYBRID-BCIHYBRID-BC1® alloy is a CRA product with potential applications in the chemical processing industryand petrochemical industries that has demonstrated resistance to hydrochloric and sulfuric acid. HR-224acid as well as several organic acids. Most recently the alloy has found applications in agrichemical and refinery industries further expanding the use of the alloy. Management expects demand for these alloys will continue to grow in chemical processing and other markets.

In the oil and gas industry, HASTELLOY® C-22HS® alloy has found multiple applications. Commercialization of this alloy continues as is the testing, evaluation and promotion of this alloy with special emphasis on applications for this industry.

In addition to the successful commercialization of the above alloys, the Company continues to develop applications for four new alloys which are still being scaled up at the mill and are in the early stages of the commercialization process. HAYNES® NS-163® alloy is a nitride dispersion strengthened material that represents an entirely new metallurgical approach to achieving very high creep resistance at high temperatures. Technical process developments are still under investigation. HAYNES® HR-224® alloy is an HTA product with superior resistance to oxidation and excellent fabricability.

In addition to the commercialization of the above alloys, the Company continues to develop applications for new alloys not yet ready to begin the commercialization process. HAYNES NS‑163® alloy (U.S. patent grantedfabricability, and is being assessed in 2011) is in the scale‑up phase. This new material is believed to have significant, medium to long‑term commercial potential. HAYNES NS‑163 alloy is a new alloy with extraordinary high‑temperature strength in sheet form, which has applications in the aerospace, industrial gas turbinecertain current and automotive markets. Data generation and fabrication trials continued through 2017, with test marketing initiated in early 2009. HAYNES HR‑235TM was introduced in fiscal 2013. Thisemerging technology applications. HAYNES® HR-235® alloy has excellent resistance to metal dusting in carbonaceous high temperature carbonaceous environments. Potential uses includeGood progress in developing new applications infor the alloy for petrochemical production and syngas plants. Scale-up ofproduction applications has been made this alloy is well underway and material is currently being evaluated by certain key customers.past fiscal year. Most recently, HAYNES 233TMHAYNES® 233TM alloy was introduced. This alloy offersintroduced to provide excellent oxidation resistance coupled with superior creep strength at temperatures to 2100°F or higher coupled with superior clasp strength, ahigher. This combination of properties is believed not to have not been achieved previously in a readily fabricatedfabricable alloy. TheCommercialization for this alloy is currently being scaled-upongoing and introduced to key customers.significant progress has been made over the past year in developing applications for this new alloy in aerospace, industrial gas turbines, and other high temperature applications.

Patents or other proprietary rights are an important element of the Company’s business. The Company’s strategy is to file patent applications in the U.S. and any other country that represents an important potential commercial market to the Company. In addition, the Company seeks to protect technology that is important to the development of the Company’s business. The Company also relies upon trade secret rights to protect its technologies and its development of new processes, applications and alloys. The Company protects its trade secrets in part through confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with its customers.customers and employees. Trademarks on the names of many of the Company’s alloys have also been applied for or granted in the U.S. and certain foreign countries.

While the Company believes its patents are important to its competitive position, significant barriers to entry continue tomay exist beyond the expiration of any patent period. These barriers to entry include the unique equipment required to produce this materialthese materials and the exacting processprocesses required to achieve the desired metallurgical properties. These processing requirements include such items as specific annealing temperature,optimal melting and thermo-mechanical processing speeds and reduction per rolling pass.parameters for each alloy. Management believes that the current alloy development programprograms and these barriers to entry reduce the impact of patent expirations on the Company.

7

Raw Materials

Raw materials represented an estimated 41% of cost of sales in fiscal 2022. Nickel, a major component of many of the Company’s products, accounted for approximately 51% of raw material costs, or approximately 21% of total cost of sales in fiscal 2022.  Other raw materials include cobalt, chromium, molybdenum and tungsten. Melt materials consist of virgin raw material, purchased scrap and internally produced scrap.

The average nickel prices per pound for cash buyers for the 30-day period ended on September 30, 2020, 2021 and 2022, as reported by the London Metals Exchange, were $6.74, $8.80 and $10.28 respectively. Prices for certain other raw materials that are significant in the manufacture of the Company’s products, such as cobalt, chromium and molybdenum were higher in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021.

The Company’s business model includes mill manufacturing and global distribution facilities, which create a long working capital cycle and contribute to a long position as it relates to commodity price risk, especially for product sold out of distribution facility inventory at spot prices.  In addition, the type of high-performance products the Company produces require multiple production steps to create the final yielded product that is sold to the customer.  These refining steps generate high revert scrap pounds that are recycled back through the melt at metal value.  This scrap cycle also contributes to a long position as it relates to commodity price risk.

Although alternative sources of supply are available, the Company currently purchases nickel through an exclusive arrangement with a single supplier to ensure consistent quality and supply. The Company purchases raw materials through various arrangements including fixed-term contracts and spot purchases, which involve a variety of pricing mechanisms. In cases where the Company prices its products at the time of order placement, the Company attempts to establish selling prices with reference to known costs of materials, thereby reducing the risk associated with changes in the cost of raw materials. However, to the extent that the price of nickel fluctuates rapidly, there may be a favorable or unfavorable effect on the Company’s gross profit margins. The Company periodically purchases material forward with certain suppliers in connection with fixed price agreements with customers.

The Company values inventory utilizing the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) inventory costing methodology. Under the FIFO inventory costing method, the cost of materials included in cost of sales may be different from the current market price at the time of sale of finished product due to the length of time from the acquisition of the raw material to the sale of the finished product. In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation method normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first out method. Conversely, in a period of rising raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation method normally results in lower costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first out method.

End Markets

The global specialty alloy market consists ofincludes stainless steels, titanium alloys, general purpose nickel alloys and high‑performance nickel‑high-performance nickel- and cobalt‑basedcobalt-based alloys. Of this total market, the Company primarily competes in the high‑performance nickel‑high-performance nickel- and cobalt‑basedcobalt-based alloy sector, which demands diverse specialty alloys suitable for use in precision manufacturing. Given the technologically advanced nature of the products, strict requirements of the end users and higher‑growthhigher-growth end markets, in general the Company believes the high‑performancehigh-performance alloy sector provides greater growth potential, the opportunity for higher profit margins and greater opportunities for service, product and price differentiation as compared to the stainless steels and general-purpose nickel alloys markets. While stainless steel and general-purpose nickel alloys are generally sold in bulk through third‑partythird-party distributors, the Company’s products are sold in smaller‑sizedsmaller-sized orders which are customized and typically handled on a direct‑to‑customerdirect-to-customer basis.

The Company believes it is an industry leader in developing new alloys to meet its customers’ specialized and demanding requirements. The Company continues to work closely with customers and end users of its products to identify opportunities to develop and manufacture new high-performance alloys. The Company’s technical programs have yielded many new proprietary alloys with multiple applications, an accomplishment that the Company believes distinguishes it

8

from its competitors.

Developing new applications for its new and existing alloys is also a key strength and strategy of the Company. The Company leverages its technical expertise to develop unique applications for its products, especially proprietary and specialty alloys that can yield higher margins. These new applications, including use in unique special projects and new programs, are an important part of the Company’s growth and profitability strategy.

Aerospace.  The Company has manufactured HTA products for the aerospace market since the late 1930s and has developed numerous proprietary alloys for this market. Customers in the aerospace market tend to be the most demanding with respect to meeting specifications within veryspecification requirements, precise tolerances and achieving new product performance standards. Stringent safety standards and continuous efforts to reduce equipment weight, reduce emissions, and develop more fuel-efficient designs require close coordination betweenamong the Company, the aero-engine OEM’s, and itstheir customers in the selection and development of HTA products. As a result, sales to aerospace customers tend to be made through the Company’s direct sales force. Demand for the Company’s products in the aerospace market is based on the new and replacement market for jet engines and the maintenance needs of operators of commercial and military aircraft. The Company specializes in theCompany’s HTA products are used for static parts included

8


components in the hot sections of the jet engine.aero-engine. The hot sections are subjected to substantial wear and tear and accordingly require periodic maintenance, repair and overhaul. The Company views the maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) business as an area of continuing long‑termlong-term growth. Besides the commercial and military aircraft engine market, HTA products are also used in space technology applications. The company expects growth in this area as well.

Chemical Processing.  The chemical processing market represents a large base of customers with diverse CRA and HTA applications driven by demand forin key end-use markets such as automobiles, housing, health care, biopharmaceuticals, agriculture and metals production. Both CRA and HTA products supplied by the Company have been used in the chemical processing market since the early 1930s. Demand for the Company’s products in this market is driven by the level of MRO and expansion requirements of existing chemical processing facilities, as well as the construction of new facilities. The expansion of manufacturing of chemicals from natural gas liquids in North America is expected to be a driver of demand in this market. In addition, the Company believes the extensive worldwide network of Company‑ownedCompany-owned service and sales centers, as well as its network of independent distributors and sales agents who supplement the Company’s direct sales efforts outside of the U.S., provide a competitive advantage in marketing its CRA and HTA products in the chemical processing market.

Industrial gas turbine (formerly referred to as Land-based gas turbines).Gas Turbine.  Demand for the Company’s products in the industrial gas turbine market is driven primarily by the construction of cogeneration facilities such asutility-scale electricity generation, both for base load as well as for electric utilities or as backup sources to fossil fuel‑fired utilitiesgeneration during times of peak power demand.  Demand forThe benefit of these turbines are their relatively low cost, high efficiency, rapid response and reliability, especially as weather-controlled renewables have become major sources of electricity. An additional demand consideration is the Company’s alloys in the industrial gas turbine markets has also been driven by concerns regarding loweringdrive to lower emissions from coal-fired generating facilities, powered by fossil fuels. Industrialsince natural gas turbine generating facilities havehas gained acceptance as clean, low‑cost alternativesa cleaner, lower-cost alternative to fossil fuel‑fired electric generating facilities.coal.  Industrial gas turbines are also used for power and propulsion in power barges with mobilitycertain classes of ships and ferries, most commonly as temporary base‑load‑generating units for countries that have numerous islands and a large coastline.derivatives of popular aero turbine engines. Demand is also generated by mechanical drive units used for oil and gas production and pipeline transportation as well as microturbines that are used asand for back-up sources of power generation for hospitals and shopping malls. The Company also has a strong presence in micro turbine applications, which provide decentralized power and thermal heating for many key markets.  The Company’s products have allowed turbines to operate with higher temperatures and efficiencies for much longer service intervals.

Other Markets.  Other markets in which the Company sells its HTA products and CRA products include flue‑gasflue-gas desulfurization (FGD), oil and gas, waste incineration, industrial heat treating, automotive, thermocouples, sensors and instrumentation, biopharmaceuticals, solar and nuclear fuel. The FGD market has been driven by both legislated and self‑imposedself-imposed standards for lowering emissions from fossil fuel‑fuel fired electric generating facilities. This market has softened and is expected to continue to soften in the U.S. if the trend to switch from coal to natural gas for power plants continues.continues, but has continued potential in other regions of the world.  The Company also sells its products for use in the oil and gas market, primarily in connection with sour gas production. In addition, incineration of municipal, biological, industrial and hazardous waste products typically produces very corrosive conditions that demand high‑high performance alloys. The Company continues to look for opportunities to introduce and expand the use of its alloys in emerging technologies such as solar, fuel cells, ultra-supercritical steam and supercritical-CO2 power plants, and molten salt nuclear fuel reactor

9

applications. Markets capable of providing growth are being driven by increasing performance, reliability and service life requirements for products used in these markets, which could provide further applications for the Company’s products.

Through development of new alloys and new applications, the Company continues to seek to participate in additional markets with new revenue streams beyond the core markets of aerospace, chemical processing and industrial gas turbine industries. The Company believes that medical/pharmaceutical, consumer electronics, petrochemical and emerging technologies such as renewable and clean energy, hydrogen production, next-generation nuclear power generation and additive manufacturing all present possible significant growth opportunities for its products.

Sales and Marketing and Distribution

The Company sells its products primarily through its direct sales organization, which operates from 1714 total locations in the U.S., Europe and Asia, 1311 of which are service and/or sales centers. All of the Company’s service and/or sales centers are operated either directly by the Company or through its directlydirect or indirectly wholly‑ownedindirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. Approximately 76%74% of the Company’s net revenue in fiscal 20172022 was generated by the Company’s direct sales organization. The remaining 24%26% of the Company’s fiscal 20172022 net revenues was generated by a network of independent distributors and sales agents who supplement the Company’s direct sales in the U.S., Europe and Asia.  Going forward, the Company expects its direct sales force to continue to generate approximately 80%75% of its total net revenues.

Providing technical assistance to customers is an important part of the Company’s marketing strategy. The Company provides performance analyses of its products and those of its competitors for its customers. These analyses enable the Company to evaluate the performance of its products enabling the products to be included as part of the technical specifications used in the production of customers’ products. The Company’s market development professionals are assisted by its engineering and technology staff in directing the sales force to new opportunities. Management believes the Company’s combination of direct sales, technical marketing, engineering and customer support provides an advantage over other manufacturers in the high‑performancehigh-performance alloy industry. This framework allows the Company to obtain direct insight into customers’ alloy needs and to develop proprietary alloys that provide solutions to customers’ problems.

9


demanding applications.

The Company continues to focus on growing its business in foreign markets, operating from service and sales centers in Asia and Europe.Europe (particularly the U.K.).

While the Company is making concentrated efforts to expand foreign sales, the majority of its revenue continues to be provided by sales to U.S. customers. The Company’s domestic expansion effort includes, but is not limited to, capital investment in increased capacity, the continued expansion of ancillary product forms, the continued development of new high‑performancehigh-performance alloys, the addition of equipment in U.S. service and sales centers to improve the Company’s ability to provide a product closer to the form required by the customer the consolidation of the Company’s service centers in the Midwestern United States and the continued effort, through the technical expertise of the Company, to find solutions to customer challenges.

The following table sets forth the approximate percentage of the Company’s fiscal 20172022 net revenues generated through each of the Company’s distribution channels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

From

    

From

    

 

 

 

Domestic

 

Foreign

 

 

 

 

Locations

 

Locations

 

Total

 

    

From

    

From

    

 

Domestic

Foreign

 

Locations

Locations

Total

 

Company mill direct/service and sales centers

 

50

%  

26

%  

76

%  

 

50

%  

24

%  

74

%  

Independent distributors/sales agents

 

23

%  

 1

%  

24

%  

 

25

%  

1

%  

26

%  

Total

 

73

%  

27

%  

100

%  

 

75

%  

25

%  

100

%  

The Company’s top twenty customers accounted for approximately 40%43%, 41%34% and 38%39% of the Company’s net revenues in fiscal 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, respectively. No customer or group of affiliated customers of the Company accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net revenues in fiscal 2015, 20162020, 2021 or 2017.2022.

Net revenues in fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017 were generated primarily by the Company’s U.S. operations. Sales to domestic customers comprised approximately 59%, 58% and 60%10

The Company’s foreign and export sales were approximately $199.9 million, $172.8 million and $159.7 million for fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Additional information concerning foreign operations and export sales is set forth in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form��10‑K.

Manufacturing Process

High‑High performance alloys require a lengthier, more complex productionan extensive knowledge of both the specific alloy systems, as well as the process and are more difficultparameters required to manufacture than lower‑performance alloys, such as stainless steel. The alloying elements in high‑performance alloys must be highly refined during melting, and the manufacturing process must bedeliver a tightly controlled product to produce precise chemical properties.customer specifications. These products are tightly controlled from a chemistry standpoint, and require specialized equipment capable of delivering the physical and metallurgical properties that our customers require for their specialized applications. The resulting alloyed material isnumber of process steps are typically more difficult to process because, by design, it is more resistant to deformation. Consequently, high‑extensive for these high performance alloys require that a greater force be applied when hot or cold working and are less susceptible to reduction or thinning when rolling or forging. This results in more cycles of rolling, annealing and picklingalloy systems as compared to a lower‑performance alloy to achieve proper dimensions. Certain alloys may undergo fortywhat would be required for stainless or more distinct stages of melting, remelting, annealing, hot reduction, cold reduction, pickling and testing before they achieve the specifications required by a customer.carbon steel products. This longer production cycle contributes to slower inventory turns. The Company manufactures its high‑performancehigh-performance alloys in various forms, including sheet, coil, plate, billet/ingot, tubular, wire and other forms. The Company also performs value‑addedvalue-added cutting services to supply certain customers with product cut to their specification.

At the Kokomo, Indiana facility, the manufacturing process begins with raw materials being combined, melted and refined in a precise manner to produce the chemical composition specified for each high‑performancehigh-performance alloy. The Company’s primary melt facility utilizes two different melting processes. The argon oxygen decarburizationARC/AOD process utilizes electric melting and gas controlsrefinement to remove carbon and other undesirable elements, thereby allowing more tightly‑controlledtightly-controlled chemistries, which in turn produce more consistent properties in the high‑performancehigh-performance alloys. The other primary melt method utilizes vacuum induction melting, which involves the melting of raw materials through electromagnetic induction

10


while under vacuum conditions to produce the desired tightly‑controlledtightly-controlled chemistry. The control systems allow for statistical process control monitoring in real time to improve product quality. For most high‑performancehigh-performance alloys, this molten material is cast into electrodes and additionally refined through electroslag remelting. The resulting ingots are then forged or rolled to an intermediate shape and size depending upon the intended final product form. Intermediate shapes destined for flat products are then sent through a series of hot and cold rolling, annealing, pickling, leveling and shearing operations before being cut to final size.

The Company has a four‑highfour-high Steckel rolling mill for use in hot rolling high‑performancehigh-performance alloys, created specifically for that purpose. The four‑highfour-high Steckel rolling mill was installed in 1982 and is one of the most powerful four‑highfour-high Steckel rolling mills in the world. The mill is capable of generating approximatelyover 12.0 million pounds of separating force and rolling a plate up to 72 inches wide. The mill includes integrated computer controls (with automatic gaugegap control and programmed rolling schedules), two coiling Steckel furnaces and seven heating furnaces. Computer‑controlledComputer-controlled rolling schedules for each of the hundreds of combinations of product shapes and sizes the Company produces allow the mill to roll numerous widths and gauges to exact specifications without stoppages or changeovers.

The Company also operates a three‑highthree-high hot rolling mill and a two‑hightwo-high hot rolling mill, each of which is capable of custom processing much smaller quantities of material than the four‑highfour-high Steckel rolling mill. These mills provide the Company with significant flexibility in running smaller batches of varied products in response to customer requirements. The Company believes the flexibility provided by the three‑highthree-high and two‑hightwo-high mills provides the Company with an advantage over its major competitors in obtaining smaller specialty orders.

The coil and sheet operation includes the ability to cold roll to tight tolerances, bright anneal, oxidize anneal and pickle, along with finishing processes that slit and cut to size.  The Company recently madeIn recent years, the capital investment to redesign, rebuild, and operate a cold mill that has been shuttered for a decade, resulting in a significant increase in capacity in that area.  The Company has also invested installed, and begun to operate a new processing line for moresuccessfully brought on-line additional cold rolling capability, as well as annealing capacity to support the added rolling capacity. This added annealing capacity gives the Company the ability to offer either bright annealed finish or anneal and pickled finish that will be determined by specifications, application or type of alloy.

The Company also produces bar and billet product through a series of bar mills and a forge press operation that is located at the Kokomo, Indiana facility. 

The Arcadia, Louisiana facility uses nickel feedstock produced at the Kokomo facility to fabricatemanufacture welded and seamless nickel alloy pipe, and tubing and fittings, and purchases titanium extruded tube hollows to produce seamless titanium tubing. The manufacturing processes at Arcadia require cold pilger mills, weld mills, draw benches, annealing furnaces, pickling facilities, and pickling facilities.various finishing lines.  The Company recently completed a capital investment project that added capacityhas also invested in the above‑mentioned processes.specialized ultrasonic testing and eddy current testing equipment, including its own testing laboratory.

11

The Mountain Home, North Carolina facility primarily manufactures finished high‑performancehigh-performance alloy wire.wire and small diameter bar products. Finished wire, bar, and powder products are also warehoused at this facility.facility for quick delivery.  The facility has recently made an investment in a 1MW Solar Array to produce 50% of the facility’s electrical needs from the sun.

Backlog

The Company defines backlog to include firm commitments from customers for delivery of product at established prices.  There areAt any given time, approximately 50% of the orders in the backlog at any given time which include prices that are subject to adjustment based on changes in raw material costs, that can vary from approximately 30%-50% of the orders.costs.  Historically, approximately 75%70% of the Company’s backlog orders have shipped within six months and approximately 90% have shipped within 12 months. The backlog figures do not typically reflect that portion of the Company’s business conducted at its service and sales centers on a spot or “just‑in‑time”“just-in-time” basis. For additional discussion of backlog, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K.

Consolidated Backlog at Fiscal Quarter End

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

 

(in millions)

 

1st quarter

    

$

211.7

    

$

180.2

    

$

215.5

    

$

204.7

    

$

167.3

 

(in millions)

 

1st quarter

    

$

205.7

    

$

237.8

    

$

237.6

    

$

145.1

    

$

217.5

2nd quarter

 

 

207.0

 

 

202.3

 

 

220.4

 

 

193.5

 

 

170.8

 

 

212.3

 

253.0

 

204.7

 

140.9

 

280.7

3rd quarter

 

 

189.6

 

 

204.7

 

 

192.9

 

 

187.2

 

 

180.9

 

 

220.6

 

254.9

 

174.6

 

150.9

 

338.2

4th quarter

 

 

166.6

 

 

221.3

 

 

185.8

 

 

168.3

 

 

177.3

 

 

216.0

 

235.2

 

153.3

 

175.3

 

373.7

11


Raw Materials

Raw materials represented 36% of cost of sales in fiscal 2017. Nickel, a major component of many of the Company’s products, accounted for approximately 35% of raw material costs, or approximately 13% of total cost of sales in fiscal 2017.  Other raw materials include cobalt, chromium, molybdenum and tungsten. Melt materials consist of virgin raw material, purchased scrap and internally produced scrap.

The average nickel price per pound for cash buyers for the 30‑day period ended on September 30, 2015, 2016 and 2017, as reported by the London Metals Exchange, was $4.49, $4.63 and $5.10 respectively. Prices for certain other raw materials which are significant in the manufacture of the Company’s products, such as molybdenum and cobalt were higher in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, while the price for chromium was lower in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016.

Although alternative sources of supply are available, the Company currently purchases nickel through an exclusive arrangement with a single supplier to ensure consistent quality and supply. The Company purchases raw materials through various arrangements including fixed‑term contracts and spot purchases, which involve a variety of pricing mechanisms. In cases where the Company prices its products at the time of order placement, the Company attempts to establish selling prices with reference to known costs of materials, thereby reducing the risk associated with changes in the cost of raw materials. However, to the extent that the price of nickel fluctuates rapidly, there may be a favorable or unfavorable effect on the Company’s gross profit margins. The Company periodically purchases material forward with certain suppliers in connection with fixed price agreements with customers. In the event a customer fails to meet the expected volume levels or the consumption schedule deviates from the expected schedule, a rapid or prolonged decrease in the price of raw materials could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company values inventory utilizing the first‑in, first‑out (“FIFO”) inventory costing methodology. Under the FIFO inventory costing method, the cost of materials included in cost of sales may be different from the current market price at the time of sale of finished product due to the length of time from the acquisition of the raw material to the sale of the finished product. In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation method normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to last‑in, first out method. Conversely, in a period of rising raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation method normally results in lower costs of sales.

Research and Technical Support

The Company’s technology facilities are located at the Kokomo headquarters and consist of 19,000 square feet of offices and laboratories, as well as an additional 90,000 square feet of paved storage area. The Company has six fully equipped technology testing laboratories, including a mechanical and wear test lab, a metallographic lab, an electron microscopy lab, a corrosion lab, a high-temperature lab and a welding lab. These facilities also contain a reduced scale, fully equipped melt shop and process lab. As of September 30, 2017,2022, the technology, engineering and technological testing staff consisted of 2826 persons, 1513 of whom have engineering or science degrees, including 7 with doctoral degrees, with the majority of degrees in the field of metallurgical engineering or materials science.

Research and technical support costs primarily relate to efforts to develop new proprietary alloys and new applications for existing alloys. The Company spent approximately $3.6 million, $3.7 million and $3.9 million for research and technical support activities for fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

During fiscal 2017,2022, research and development projects were focused on new alloy development, new product form development, process modeling, supportive data generation, and new alloy concept validation, relating to products for the aerospace, industrial gas turbine, chemical processing and oil and gas industries. In addition, significant projects were conducted to generate technical data in support of major market application opportunities in areas such as renewable energy, fuel cell systems, biotechnology (including toxic waste incineration and pharmaceutical manufacturing) and power generation.

Competition

The high‑performancehigh-performance alloy market is a highly competitive market in which eight to ten major producers participate in various product forms. The Company’s primary competitors in flat rolled products include Special Metals

12


Corporation, a subsidiary of Precision Castparts Corp., Allegheny Technologies, Inc. and VDM Metals GmbH.GmbH, a subsidiary of Acerinox, S.A. The Company faces strong competition from domestic and foreign manufacturers of both high‑performancehigh-performance alloys (similar to those the Company produces) and other competing metals. The Company may face additional competition in the future to the extent new materials are developed, such as plastics, ceramics or additive manufacturing that may be substituted for the Company’s products. The Company also believes that it will face increased competition from non‑U.S.non-U.S. entities in the next five to tenfew years, especially from competitors located in Eastern Europe and Asia.  Additionally, in recentpast years, the Company’s domestic business has been challenged by a strong U.S. dollar, which makes the goods of foreign competitors less expensive to import into the U.S and makes the Company’s products more expensive to export outside the U.S.

12

In recentpast years, the Company experienced strong price competition from competitors who produce both stainless steel and high‑performance alloys due primarily to weakness in the stainless steel market. Increased competitionwhich requires the Company to price its products competitively, which pressures the Company’s gross profit margin and net income.competitively.  The Company continues to respond to this competition bythrough alloy and application development, increasing emphasis on service centers, offering value‑addedvalue-added services, improving its cost structure and striving to improve delivery times and reliability.

EmployeesHuman Capital Resources

The Company values its workforce as one of its most important assets.  Accordingly, the Company has adopted and maintains a number of programs and practices designed to attract and retain the best available personnel.

Succession and Recruitment

The Company has an organizational development and succession planning process in place for human capital strategic planning.  The strategic development process is continually updated and often consists of multi-year succession and development plans for individuals. Such succession plans have been utilized throughout the Company to prepare employees for future roles and leadership opportunities.  

The Company attempts to promote from within when opportunities occur, given employee growth and progression.  The Company also utilizes outside recruiters due to the challenging and competitive hiring environment.  In order to encourage development of a future workforce for the Company, the Company continues to sponsor a Ph.D. candidate and Senior Metallurgical Engineers Research Project from Purdue University, as well as providing internships in various departments and locations throughout the Company.

Retirement and Exit Programs

The Company also utilizes exit interviews and on-boarding interviews to provide feedback regarding turnover and employee desires for growth and development.  These interviews are also utilized to identify drivers of voluntary turnover and departures from the Company.  Employee turnover rate and reasons, including voluntary and involuntary departures, are monitored annually.  The global turnover rate in fiscal 2021 was 14%, compared to 13% in fiscal 2022.   Both voluntary and involuntary terminations, including retirements, are used to calculate the turnover rate.  

Compensation Equity

The Company conducts inflation-adjusted compensation analysis to promote competitive compensation.  This analysis takes into account ranges for the geographical area, education level and job title under consideration.  The Company’s Human Resources Department develops offers for new salaried employees and also develops and administers promotions to maintain the internal integrity of the compensation levels for comparable positions.  The Company works with managers to ensure that high potential employees and those individuals with unique talents are appropriately developed and compensated.  For example, the Board of Directors authorized a pool of restricted stock that can be used to compensate high potential employees and for retention purposes.  Further, bonus programs have been implemented at the LaPorte and Mountain Home facilities, as well as those in Europe and Asia, for retention and recognition purposes, and all salaried employees who are not eligible to participate in the Management Incentive Plan were given bonuses in fiscal 2022.  The Compensation Committee, with the approval of the full Board in the case of incentive compensation, determines annual salaries and other elements of compensation of the Company’s executive management team, taking into account similarly situated executives employed by a peer group of companies while also considering input of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.  

Diversity and Inclusion

The Company considers diversity as a criterion evaluated as a part of the attributes and qualifications a candidate possesses.  The Company construes the notion of diversity broadly, considering differences in viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills and other individual qualities, in addition to race, gender, age, ethnicity and cultural backgrounds as elements that contribute to a diverse Company.      

13

Management also considers similar broad concepts of diversity in its selection of vendors, contractors and other service providers.  As a federal government subcontractor, the Company follows applicable federal rules and regulations relating to diversity and other matters, including reporting requirements.  

Company Culture

The Company has controls in place relating to compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, including a requirement for annual employee certification of that code as well as an established whistleblower hotline and related procedures.  In addition, human capital management, and more specifically employee hiring and retention, are included within the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management program, which is subject to Board oversight through regular reporting.  

Community Involvement

The Company has used internships and partnerships with universities to enrich recruiting efforts, particularly for technical roles such as research, alloy development and engineering.  The Company has also utilized outreach and partnerships with local community resources at all major locations such as community and technical colleges, workforce development agencies, industry groups and other entities to strengthen the Company’s hiring process and expand the future workforce candidate pool.

Employee Engagement and Wellness

The Company has a long-standing tuition reimbursement program to assist employees with the continuation of their education.  In addition, Company-sponsored employee assistance programs offer counseling for emotional, financial and family issues.  Continuing financial planning education is provided by the Company’s 401(k) plan administrator to assist employees in financial and retirement planning.  For many years, the Company’s investment in human capital has involved commitments to worker training, apprenticeship programs and funding college scholarships.

Management and Board Oversight

Management is engaged in the Company’s efforts regarding management of human capital resources at all levels through regular informational meetings, the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management program and organized succession planning.  The Board oversees these activities through regular reports by senior management regarding new or altered programs and as part of the Enterprise Risk Management process.  In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board is actively engaged in monitoring and encouraging diversity at the Board level while the Compensation Committee also focuses on achieving and maintaining internal and external pay equity for the executive team and the Board members while overseeing incentive compensation more broadly throughout the organization.  In promoting pay equity, the Board and the Compensation Committee make use of peer comparisons and benchmarking measures.

Employee Statistics

As of September 30, 2017,2022, the Company employed 1,124 full‑time1,223 full-time employees and 32 part-time employees worldwide. All eligible hourly employees at the Kokomo, Indiana and Arcadia, Louisiana plants and the Lebanon, Indiana service center (579(637 in the aggregate) are covered by two collective bargaining agreements.

On July 1, 2013,2018, the Company entered into a new five-year collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America Local 2958, which covers eligible hourly employees at the Kokomo, Indiana plant and the Lebanon, Indiana service center.plant. This agreement will expire in June 2018.2023.

On December 21, 2015,2020, the Company entered into a new collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America Local 1505, which covers eligible hourly employees at the Company’s Arcadia, Louisiana plant. This agreement will expire in December 2020.2025.  

14

Management believes that current relations with the union are satisfactory.

Environmental MattersCompliance

The Company has an enterprise level environmental policy, which focuses on fostering a safe workplace, offering high quality products while protecting the environment, compliance with law and health and safety management systems, utilization of all available resources to improve the quality, environmental, health and safety management systems and setting, implementing and reviewing quality, environmental, health and safety objectives and targets.  This policy is communicated to contractors and vendors who provide services on site, and the Company periodically audits selected suppliers from an environmental compliance perspective.  The Company maintains an environmental management system certified to ISO 14001 standards and, for its Kokomo operations, ISO 50001 standards.  The Company maintains multiple policies designed to comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards and has ISO 45001 certification.  

The Company’s facilities and operations are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the environment and the storage, handling, use, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. In the U.S., such laws include, without limitation, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. As environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, it is likely the Company will be subject to increasingly stringent environmental standards in the future, particularly under air quality and water quality laws and standards related to climate change issues, such as reporting of greenhouse gas emissions. Violations of these laws and regulations can result in the imposition of substantial penalties and can require facility improvements. Expenses related to environmental compliance, which are primarily included in Cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, were approximately $2.4$3.1 million for fiscal 20172022 and are currently expected to be approximately $2.8$2.9 million for fiscal 2018.2023.  

The Company’s facilities are subject to periodic inspection by various regulatory authorities, who from time to time have issued findings of violations of governing laws, regulations and permits. In the past five years, the Company has paid administrative fines, none of which have had a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, for alleged violations relating to environmental matters, requirements relating to its Title V Air Permit and alleged violations of record keeping and notification requirements relating to industrial waste waterwastewater discharge. Capital expenditures of approximately $1.6$2.4 million were made for pollution control improvements during fiscal 2017,2022, with additional expenditures of approximately $2.2$3.8 million for similar improvements planned for fiscal 2018.2023.

The Company has received permits from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources to close and provide post‑closurepost-closure environmental monitoring and care for certain areas of its Kokomo and Mountain Home, North Carolina facilities, respectively.  

13


The Company is required among other things to monitor groundwater and to continue post‑closurepost-closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, the Company is aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater andon the Company’s property.  These levels are stable or decreasing, but additional testing and corrective action by the Company could be required.  The Company is unable to estimate the costs of any further corrective action at these sites, if required. Accordingly, the Company cannot assure that the costs of any future corrective action at these or any other current or former sites would not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company may also incur liability for alleged environmental damages associated with the off‑siteoff-site transportation and disposal of hazardous substances.  Generators of hazardous substances which are transported to disposal sites where environmental problems are alleged to exist are subject to claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA, and state counterparts. CERCLA imposes strict, joint and several liabilities for investigatory and cleanup costs upon hazardous substance generators, site owners and operators and other potentially responsible parties. The Company is currently named as a potentially responsible party at one site. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be named as a potentially responsible party at other sites in the future

15

or that the costs associated with those sites would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

On February 11, 2016,Legal Compliance

In addition to environmental laws and regulations, the Company voluntarily reportedmust comply with a wide variety of other laws and regulations, including, without limitation, federal and state securities laws, Delaware corporate law and safety laws and regulations.  The Company continues to engage in collaboration with key stakeholders, such as customers and regulators, to adapt to changing regulatory expectations.  Compliance with law and government regulations is not expected to have a material effect upon capital expenditures, earnings or the competitive position of the Company.  

Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

In addition to the Louisiana Departmentinformation set forth below, further information regarding the Company’s environmental, social and governance activities can be found under the Sustainability tab on the Company’s website at www.haynesintl.com/company-information/sustainability.

Governance and Social Matters

The Company is committed to a culture of Environmental Quality a leak that it discoveredopenness, trust and integrity in oneall aspects of its chemical cleaning operationsbusiness. It is critical that all employees, vendors and customers understand and accept that, in everything it does, the Company will conduct itself from the perspective of “doing the right thing for the right reason” at all times.

The Company has a number of policies in place governing social and ethical issues, including, without limitation:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Anti-Harassment Policy
Human Rights Policy
Human Trafficking Policy
Anti-Corruption Policy
Conflict Minerals Policy
Gift Policy
Supplier Code of Conduct

All Company employees must certify compliance with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics annually, and regular training is provided to employees regarding these and other policies. In addition, the Company maintains a whistleblower hotline with access available on an anonymous basis online or by telephone. 

16

Environmental Matters

At the end of fiscal 2022, the Company completed the installation of a 1MW solar fixed ground mount array system at its Arcadia, Louisianawire facility located in Mountain Home, North Carolina which helps the Company to reduce its dependence on nonrenewable energy sources.  This solar system is expected to provide over 50% of the electricity needs for that facility.  As

In addition, since fiscal year 2010, the Company has invested more than $2.0 million in energy conservation programs covering all of its facilities, and as a result, of the discovery, the Company now saves approximately $1.5 million in energy costs per year. The Company has specific targets in place for reducing electricity and natural gas consumption in its energy conservation programs.

The Company is conscious of its environmental impact and is actively working to lighten its carbon footprint including projects to measure greenhouse gas emissions and develop goals of reduction.  The ever-increasing demand for clean energy generation has led to the development of several emerging technologies that require high-temperature alloys for demanding operating conditions.

Since the invention of HASTELLOY® X alloy in 1954, the Company’s alloys have made it possible for aerospace engines to run at high temperatures for long periods of time.  This has been further enhanced with alloys used in new generation engines such as HAYNES 282®.  Engines being placed in service today reportedly consume 15% less fuel, produce 50% less pollutants and reduce the noise footprint near airports compared to the previous generation of airplane engines.  The environmental related improvements stem in part from the increased use of alloys, such as HASTELLOY® X, HAYNES® 188, 230®, 282®, 242®, 244® and other Haynes-invented alloys.  

In addition to the Company’s alloys for energy production and powering modern aircraft in a more environmentally friendly manner, the Company’s alloys are used in chemical plants that departmentproduce ecologically safe agrichemicals which help to determinefeed the extentworld’s growing population.  Company-invented HASTELLOY® G-35®, HYBRID-BC1® and C-276 alloys are commonly used in these applications. In addition, HASTELLOY® C-22®, C-2000® and B-3® alloys are used by the pharmaceutical companies for production of chemicals.

Renewable power generation offers the issuepromise of producing power from nature’s resources, such as wind, sun, rivers and appropriate remediation.oceans, with minimal depletion to the Earth’s resources and damage to the environment.  Many renewable energy technologies require the capture of energy at very high temperatures in extreme environments for which the Company’s alloys are well suited.  For example, the Company’s materials withstand intense heat in concentrated solar power plants to facilitate storable thermal power to generate electricity after the sun sets.

Safety Matters

Safety is the Company’s top priority.  Listed below are certain improvement efforts the Company has implemented in order to reduce occurrences of injuries, occupational diseases and work-related fatalities.

Each year, employees receive emergency preparedness training, and the Company conducts severe weather and fire drills periodically.
Employees attend refresher training annually. This training includes coverage of the following items: Lock Out Tag Out, Confined Spaces, First Aid and Blood borne Pathogens, Fire Prevention and Emergency Action Plan, Hearing Conservation, Hand Safety, Personal Protective Equipment requirements, Working Around Mobile Equipment and Walking and Working Surfaces.
All of the Company’s manufacturing sites have a volunteer Emergency Response Team (ERT). The ERT members are state-certified trained in first aid and HAZMAT response.
Company supervisors receive OSHA-10 Hour and Incident Investigation training.

17

The Company conducts routine departmental safety audits.

The Company extends its health and safety policies to suppliers, visitors and contractors. When suppliers, visitors and contractors come on site, they receive safety training. The training includes a review of relevant policies, required personal protection equipment, emergency procedures and specific hazards that may be encountered.

Information about our Executive Officers of the Company

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the persons who servedserve as executive officers of the Company as of September 30, 2017.2022.  Except as indicated in the following paragraphs, the principal occupations of these persons have not changed during the past five years.

Name

Age

Position with Haynes International, Inc.

Michael L. Shor

 

Name

Age

Position with Haynes International, Inc.

Mark M. Comerford

5563

 

President and Chief Executive Officer; DirectorOfficer

Daniel W. Maudlin

 

5156

 

Vice President—Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Janice W. Gunst

45

Vice President—General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

Venkat R. Ishwar

 

6570

 

Vice President—Marketing & Technology

Marlin C. Losch

 

5762

 

Vice President—Sales & Distribution

Jean C. Neel

58

Vice President—Corporate Affairs

Scott R. Pinkham

 

50

Vice President—Manufacturing

Gregory M. Spalding

6155

 

Vice President—Tube & Wire Products

David L. Strobel

61

Vice President—Operations

Gregory W. Tipton

61

Vice President & Chief Information Officer

David S. Van Bibber

 

4651

 

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Jeffrey L. Young

60

Vice President & Chief Information Officer

Mr. ComerfordShor was elected President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company in October 2008.September 2018.  Prior to that, he served as interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from May 2018 through September 2018 and Chairman of the Board of the Company from February 2017 through September 2018. Mr. Shor has been a director since 2012.

Mr. Maudlin has served as the Vice President‑FinancePresident-Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December 2012. Prior to that, he was Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company from September 2004 to December 2012.

Ms. Gunst has served as Vice President—General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company since August 2011.

Dr. Ishwar has served as Vice President—Marketing & Technology of the Company since January 2010.

Mr. Losch has served as Vice President—Sales & Distribution of the Company since January 2010.

Ms. NeelMr. Pinkham has served as Vice President—Corporate AffairsTube and Wire Products of the Company since April 2000.

14


Mr. Pinkham hasSeptember 2018.  Prior to that, he served as Vice President—Manufacturing of the Company since March 2008.

Mr. SpaldingStrobel has served as Vice President—Tube & Wire ProductsOperations of the Company since May 2009.September 2018.  Prior to that, he was a consultant to manufacturing companies through his company Silver Eagle Consulting after leaving Carpenter Technology Corporation in August 2016.  

Mr. Tipton has served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Company since January 2019.  Prior to that, he served as Chief Information Officer Americas for Dometic from August 2016 to December 2018 and as Director of Information Technology for Dometic from December 2012 to October 2016.

Mr. Van Bibber has served as Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company since December 2012.2012.

Mr. Young has served as Vice President & Chief Information Officer of the Company since November 2005.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The following risk factors should be considered carefully in addition to the other information contained in this filing.  

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face and represent risks that our management believes are material to investors regarding an investment in our Company and our business.  Additional risks and

18

uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem not material may also harm our business.  If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed.  

Risks Related to Our BusinessMarkets

Our revenues may fluctuate widely based upon changes in demand for our customers’ products.

Demand for our products is dependent upon and derived from the level of demand for the machinery, parts and equipment produced by our customers, which are principally manufacturers and fabricators of machinery, parts and equipment for highly specialized applications. Historically, certain of the markets in which we compete have experienced unpredictable, wide demand fluctuations.  Because of the comparatively high level of fixed costs associated with our manufacturing processes, significant declines in thoseour markets have had, and may continue to have, a disproportionately adverse impact on our operating results.

Since we became an independent company in 1987, weWe have, in several instances, experienced substantial year‑to‑yearyear-to-year declines in net revenues, primarily as a result of decreases in demand in the industries to which our products are sold.    InWe have, in several instances, experienced substantial year-to-year declines in net revenues, primarily as a result of decreases in demand in the industries to which our products are sold. For example, in fiscal 2002, 2003, 2009, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2020 and 2016,2021, our net revenues, when compared to the immediately preceding year, declined by approximately 10.3%, 21.2%, 31.1%, 13.0%, 16.7%, 16.6%, 22.4% and 16.6%11.3%, respectively.  We may experience similar fluctuations in our net revenues in the future. Additionally, demand is likely to continue to be subject to substantial year‑to‑yearyear-to-year fluctuations as a consequence of industry cyclicality, as well as other factors such as global economic uncertainty, and such fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Profitability in the high‑performancehigh-performance alloy industry is highly sensitive to changes in sales volumes.

The high‑performancehigh-performance alloy industry is characterized by high capital investment and high fixed costs. The cost of raw materials is the primary variable cost in the manufacture of our high‑performancehigh-performance alloys and, in fiscal 2017,2022, represented approximately 36%41% of our total cost of sales.  Other manufacturing costs, such as labor, energy, maintenance and supplies, often thought of as variable, have a significant fixed element. Profitability is, therefore, very sensitive to changes in volume, and relatively small changes in volume can result in significant variations in earnings. Our ability to effectively utilize our manufacturing assets depends greatly upon continuing demand in our end markets, successfully increasing our market share gains, and continued acceptance of our new products into the marketplace.    Any failure to effectively utilize our manufacturing assets may negatively impact our business.

We are subject to risks associated with global economic and political uncertainties.

We are susceptible to macroeconomic downturns in the United States and abroad that may affect the general economic climate and our performance and the demand of our customers. The continuing turmoil in the global economy has had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on our business and our financial condition. In addition to the impact that the global financial crisis has already had, we may face significant challenges if conditions in the global economy do not improve or if conditions worsen.

In addition, we are subject to various domestic and international risks and uncertainties, including changing social conditions and uncertainties relating to the current and future political climate. Changes in governmental policies (particularly those that would limit or reduce defense spending) could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and may reduce our customers’ demand for our products and/or depress pricing of those products used in the defense industry or which have other military applications, resulting in a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of operations, revenues and cash flows. Furthermore, any actual armed hostilities and any future terrorist attacks in the U.S. or abroad could also have an adverse impact on the U.S. economy, global financial markets and our business. The effects may include, among other things, a decrease in demand in the aerospace industry due to

15


reduced air travel, as well as reduced demand in the other industries we serve. Depending upon the severity, scope and duration of these effects, the impact on our business could be material.

We operate in cyclical markets.

A significant portion of our revenues areis derived from the highly cyclical aerospace, power generation and chemical processing markets. Our sales to the aerospace industry constituted 48.7%46.9% of our total sales in fiscal 2017.2022.  Our chemical processing and industrial gas turbine and chemical processing sales each constituted 15.6% and 17.8%, respectively,18.7% of our total sales in fiscal 2017.2022.  

The commercial aerospace industry is historically driven by demand from commercial airlines for new aircraft. The U.S. and international commercial aviation industries continue to face challenges arising from the global economic climate, competitive pressures and fuel costs. Demand for commercial aircraft is influenced by industry profitability, trends in airline passenger traffic, the state of U.S. and world economies, the ability of participants within the supply chain to access the necessary levels of staffing required to meet industry demand and the ability of aircraft purchasers to obtain required financing and numerous other factors, including the effects of terrorism and health and safety concerns.  Supply chain disruptions in this or any of our other markets could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.  

The military aerospace cycle is highly dependent on U.S. and foreign government funding; however, itfunding which is also driven by, among other factors, the effects of terrorism, a changing global political environment, U.S. foreign policy, military conflicts around the world and the retirement of older aircraft and technological improvements to new engines that increase reliability. Accordingly, the timing, duration and magnitude of cyclical upturns and downturns cannot be forecasted with certainty. Downturns or reductions in demand for our products sold into the aerospace market could have a material adverse effect on our business.

19

The industrial gas turbine market is also cyclical in nature. Demand for power generation products is global and is affected by the state of the U.S. and world economies, the availability of financing to power generation project sponsors, the increase in renewable energy and the political environments of numerous countries. The availability of fuels and related prices also have a large impact on demand. Reductions inDecreased demand for our products sold intoin the industrial gas turbine industry may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We also sell products into the chemical processing industry, which is also cyclical in nature. Customer demand for our products in this market may fluctuate widely depending on U.S. and world economic conditions, the availability and price of natural gas, the availability of financing, and the general economic strength of the end use customers in this market. Cyclical declines or sustained weakness in this market could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business depends, in part, on the success of new commercial aircraft programs and our ability to accelerate production levels to timely match order increases onin new or existing programs.

The success of our business will depend, in part, on the success of new and existing commercial aircraft programs.  We are currently under contract to supply components for a number of new commercial aircraft programs.  These newCancellations, reductions or delays of orders or contracts in any of these programs, as well as certain existingor regulatory or certification-related groundings which impact the production schedules for any aircraft programs are scheduled to have production increases over the next several years. Our failure to achieve production levels to timely match any related orders could have a material adverse effect on our business.  Cancellation, reductions or delays of orders or contracts by our customers on any of these programs, or regulatory or certification-related groundings or other delays or cancellations to any new aircraft programs or to the scheduled production increases for existing aircraft programs, could also have a material adverse effect on our business.

The competitive nature of our business resultscould result in pressure for price concessions to our customers and increased pressure to reduce our costs.

We are subject to substantial competition in all of the markets we serve, and we expect this competition to continue.serve. As a result, we have made significantmay make price concessions to our customers in the aerospace, chemical processing and power generation markets from time to time, and we expect customer pressure for further price concessions to continue.may occur. Maintenance of our market share will depend, in part, on our ability to sustain a cost structure that enables us to be cost‑competitive.cost-competitive. If we are unable to adjust our costs relative to our pricing and inflation, our profitability willcould suffer.  Our effectiveness in managing our cost structure and pricing for the value provided will be a key determinant of future profitability and competitiveness.

16


Reductions in government expenditures or changes in spending priorities could adversely affect our military aerospace business.

The budget for the U.S. Department of Defense may be reduced from current levels. In addition to debt reduction efforts already authorized, it is possible that the U.S. government could reduce or further delay its spending on, or reprioritize its spending away from, the military aerospace industry. Sequestration remains a long‑term concern, and we are unable to predict the outcome of future budget deliberations. Sequestration, or other budgetary cuts in lieu of sequestration, could negatively affect our business.

Aerospace demand is primarily dependent on two manufacturers.

A significant portion of our aerospace products are sold to fabricators and are ultimately used in the production of new commercial aircraft. There are only two primary manufacturers of large commercial aircraft in the world, The Boeing Company and Airbus.  A significant portion of our aerospace sales are dependent on the number of new aircraft built by these two manufacturers, which is in turn dependent on a number of factors over which we have little or no control. Those factors include demand for new aircraft from around the globe, utilization levels of commercial and military aircraft, success of new commercial and military aircraft programs and factors that impact manufacturing capabilities, such as the availability of raw materials and manufactured components, changes in highly exacting performance requirements and product specifications, U.S. and world economic conditions, changes in the regulatory environment and labor relations between the aircraft manufacturers and their work forces.  A significant interruption or slowdownSignificant interruptions and slowdowns in the number of new aircraft built by the aircraft manufacturers couldhas and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our operations are dependent on production levels at our Kokomo facility.

Our principal assets are located at our primary integrated production facility  Additionally, as growth in Kokomo, Indiana and at our production facilitiesairline travel is less concentrated in Arcadia, Louisiana and in Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Arcadia and Mountain Home plantsinternational flights, demand for new aircraft will be more weighted towards single aisle aircraft, as well as all of the domestic and foreign service centers relyopposed to double aisle aircraft, which utilizes a significant extent upon feedstock produced at the Kokomo facility. Any production failures, shutdowns or other significant problems at the Kokomo facility could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We maintain property damage insurance to provide for reconstruction of damaged equipment, as well as business interruption insurance to mitigate losses resulting from any production shutdown caused by an insured loss. Although we believe that our insurance is adequate to cover any such losses, that may not be the case. One or more significant uninsured losses at our Kokomo facility may have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, from time to time we schedule planned outages on the equipment at our Kokomo facility for maintenance and upgrades. These projects are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including a variety of market, operational and labor-related factors, many of which may be beyond our control. Should a planned shut down on a significant piece of equipment last substantially longer than originally planned, there could be a material adverse effect on our business.

Our production may be interrupted due to equipment failures, lack of critical spares, or other events affecting our factories.

Our manufacturing processes depend on certain sophisticated and high‑value equipment, some of which has been in operation for a long period of time for which there may be only limited or no production alternatives. Failures of this equipment, or the lack of critical spares to timely repair this equipment, could result in production delays, revenue loss and significant repair costs. In addition, our factories rely on the availability of electrical power and natural gas, transportation for raw materials and finished products and employee access to our workplace that are subject to interruption in the event of severe weather conditions or other natural or manmade events. While we maintain backup resources to the extent practicable, a severe or prolonged equipment outage, failure or other interruptive event affecting areas where we have significant manufacturing operations may result in loss of manufacturing or shipping days, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Natural or manmade events that interrupt significant manufacturing operationssmaller proportion of our customers also could have a material adverse effect on our business.material.    

17


A default under our agreements with Titanium Metals Corporation could require us to make significant payments and could disrupt our operations.

We are party to a Conversion Services Agreement and an Access and Security Agreement with Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET) that provide for the performance of certain titanium conversion services through November 2026. TIMET was acquired by Precision Castparts Corp. which owns Special Metals Corporation, a direct competitor of ours. Events of default under the Conversion Services Agreement include (a) a change in control in which the successor does not assume the agreement, (b) a violation by us of certain non‑compete obligations relating to the manufacture and conversion of titanium and (c) failure to meet agreed‑upon delivery and quality requirements. If an event of default under the Conversion Services Agreement occurs, TIMET could require us to repay the unearned portion of the $50.0 million fee paid to us by TIMET when the agreement was signed, plus liquidated damages of $25.0 million. Our obligations to pay these amounts to TIMET are secured by a security interest in our four‑high Steckel rolling mill, through which we process a substantial amount of our products. In addition, the Access and Security Agreement with TIMET includes, among other terms, an access right that would allow TIMET to use certain of our operating assets, including the four‑high mill, to perform titanium conversion services in the event of our bankruptcy or the acceleration of our indebtedness. Exercise by TIMET of its rights under its security interest following a default and non‑payment of the amounts provided in the Conversion Services Agreement or exercise of the access rights under the Access and Security Agreement could cause significant disruption in our Kokomo operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

During periods of lower demand in other alloy markets, some of our competitors may use their available capacity to produce higher volumes of high‑performancehigh-performance alloys, which leads to increased competition in the high‑performancehigh-performance alloy market.

We have experienced increased competition from competitors who produce both stainless steel and high‑performancehigh-performance alloys. Due to continued under‑utilization of capacity in the stainless steel market, we believe these competitors increased their production levels and sales activity in high‑performance alloys to keep capacity in their mills as full as possible, while offering very competitive prices and delivery times. If the stainless market does not improve, continued competition from stainless steel producers could negatively impact our average selling price and reduce our gross profit margin.

In addition, asAs a result of the competition in our markets, we have made significant price concessions to our customers from time to time, and we expect customer pressure for further price concessions to continue.typically on higher volume of more commodity type orders.  Maintenance of our market share will depend, in part, on our ability to sustain a cost structure that enables us to be cost‑competitive.cost-competitive. If we are unable to adjust

20

our costs relative to our pricing, inflation and raw material costs, our profitability will suffer. Our effectiveness in managing our cost structure through changing circumstances will be a key determinant of future profitability and competitiveness.

Periods of reduced demand and excess supply as well as the availability of substitute lower-cost materials can adversely affect our ability to price and sell our products at the profitability levels we require to be successful.

Additional worldwide capacity and reduced demand for our products could significantly impact future worldwide pricing, which would adversely impact our business.  In addition, continuedthe potential availability of lower-cost, substitute materials may also cause significant fluctuations in future results as our customers opt for a lower-cost alternative.

We change prices on our products as we deem necessary. In addition to the above general competitive impact, other market conditions and various economic factors beyond our control can adversely affect the timing of our pricing actions. The effects of any pricing actions may be delayed due to long manufacturing lead times or the terms of existing contracts. There is no guarantee that the pricing actions we implement will be effective in maintaining our profit margin levels.

Risks Related to Raw Materials

Rapid fluctuations in the priceprices of nickel, cobalt and other raw materials may materially adversely affect our business.

To the extent that we are unable to adjust to rapid fluctuations in the price of nickel, cobalt and other raw materials that we use in large quantities, there may be a negative effect on our gross profit margins. Additionally, increases in value added premiums charged by our commodity vendors, particularly nickel, could adversely impact our gross profit margins if those costs cannot be timely included in changes to selling prices.  In fiscal 2017,2022, nickel, a major component of many of our products, accounted for approximately 35%51% of our raw material costs, or approximately 13%21% of our total cost of sales. We enter into several different types of sales contracts with our customers, some of which allow us to pass on increases in nickel or other raw material prices to our customers. In other cases, we fix the nickel or other raw materials component of our prices for a period of time through the life of a long‑termlong-term contract. In yet other cases, we price our products at the time of order, which allows us to establish prices with reference

18


to known costs of our nickelraw material inventory, but which does not allow us to offset an unexpected rise in the price of nickel.raw materials.   We may not be able to successfully offset rapid increaseschanges in the price of nickel, cobalt or other raw materials in the future. In the event that raw material price increases occur that we are unable to pass on to our customers, our cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our business cycle is long, involving multiple steps.  These refining steps generate high revert scrap pounds that are recycled back through the melt at metal value.  This scrap cycle also contributes to a long position as it relates to commodity price risk.

Our results of operations may also be negatively impacted if both customer demand and nickelraw material prices rapidly fall at the same time. Because we value our inventory utilizing the first‑in, first‑outfirst-in, first-out inventory costing methodology, a rapid decrease in raw material costs has a negative effect on our operating results. In those circumstances, we recognize higher material cost in cost of sales relative to lower raw material market prices that drive the sales price.

In addition, we periodically enter into forward purchase agreements for our nickelraw material supply. If we enter into a forward purchase agreement in which isthe quantity purchased does not matchedmatch in a timely manner to the quantity sold in one or more customer contracts with fixed nickelraw material prices (including vendor premiums), a rapid or prolonged decrease in the price of nickelsignificant raw materials could adversely impact our business.

Our business is dependent on a number of raw materials that are subject to volatility in price and availability.may not be available.

We use a number of raw materials in our products which are found in only a few parts of the world and are available from a limited number of suppliers. The availability and costs of these materials may be influenced by private or government cartels, changes in world politics, trade sanctions as a result of geopolitical events such as war, additional regulation, labor relations between the materials producers and their work force, unstable governments in exporting

21

nations, inflation, general economic conditions and export quotas imposed by governments in nations with rare earth element supplies.  The ability of key material suppliers to meet quality and delivery requirements or to provide materials on price and other terms acceptable to us is beyond our control and can also impact our ability to meet commitments to customers. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected the availability of certain raw materials through its effects on the labor market, availability of transportation for materials and other factors.  Future shortages or price fluctuations in raw materials could result in decreased sales as well as decreased margins, or otherwise adversely affect our business. The enactment of new or increased import duties on raw materials imported by us could also increase the costs to usdecrease availability, thereby adversely affecting our business.  The implementation of obtaining thetrade sanctions could result in reduced availability of certain raw materials and might adversely affect our business.or result in the need for us to find alternative sources of supply at a higher cost.    

If suppliers increase the price of critical raw materials,are unable to meet our demands, we may not have alternative sources of supply. In some cases, we have entered into exclusive supply agreements with respect to raw materials, which could adversely affect our business if the exclusive supplier cannot meet quality and delivery requirements to provide materials on price and other terms acceptable to us. In addition, to the extent that we have quoted prices to customers and accepted customer orders for products prior to purchasing necessary raw materials, or have existing fixed‑price contracts, we may be unable to raise the price of products to cover all or part of the increased cost of the raw materials.

The manufacturing of the majority of our products is a complex process and requires long lead times. We may experience delays or shortages in the supply of raw materials. If we are unable to obtain adequate and timely deliveries of required raw materials, we may be unable to timely manufacture sufficient quantities of products. Thisproducts, which could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs, delay new product introductions or suffer harm to our reputation.

Risks Related to Our Production and Operations

Our operations are dependent on production levels at our Kokomo facility.

Our principal assets are located at our primary integrated production facility in Kokomo, Indiana and at our production facilities in Arcadia, Louisiana and in Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Arcadia and Mountain Home plants, as well as all of the domestic and foreign service centers, rely to a significant extent upon feedstock produced at the Kokomo facility.  We have also been affected by shortages of labor, transportation and other services and raw materials in our Kokomo and other production facilities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Any further production failures, shutdowns or other significant problems at the Kokomo facility could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We maintain property damage insurance to provide for reconstruction of damaged equipment, as well as business interruption insurance to mitigate losses resulting from any production shutdown caused by an insured loss. Although we believe that our insurance is adequate to cover any such losses, that may not be the case. Additionally, our insurance policies include deductibles that would require us to incur losses that could have an adverse effect on our financial results in the event a significant interruption occurs.  One or more significant uninsured losses at our Kokomo facility may have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, from time to time we schedule planned outages on the equipment at our Kokomo facility for maintenance and upgrades. These projects are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including a variety of market, operational and labor-related factors, many of which may be beyond our control. The COVID-19 pandemic made it necessary for us to shut down portions of our operations in fiscal 2020.  The pandemic, and its effect on our markets and our business, has also required us to temporarily or permanently lay off certain personnel.  Certain portions of our operations continue to be affected by personnel shortages.  Should a planned or unplanned shut down on a significant piece of equipment, or a significant decrease in personnel or lack of necessary new personnel, last substantially longer than originally planned, there could be a material adverse effect on our business.

Our production may be interrupted due to equipment failures, energy or personnel shortages, lack of critical spares, or other events affecting our factories.

Our manufacturing processes depend on certain sophisticated and high-value equipment, some of which has been in operation for a long period of time for which there may be only limited or no production alternatives. Failures of this equipment, possible significant unplanned delays in equipment upgrades, or the lack of critical spares or skilled personnel to timely repair this equipment, could result in production delays, revenue loss and significant repair costs. In addition, our factories rely on the availability of electrical power and natural gas, transportation for raw materials and finished products and employee access to our workplace that are subject to interruption in the event of severe weather conditions

22

or other natural or manmade events.  While we maintain backup resources to the extent practicable, a severe or prolonged equipment outage, failure or other interruptive event affecting areas where we have significant manufacturing operations may result in loss of manufacturing or shipping days, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Natural or manmade events that interrupt significant manufacturing operations of our customers also have had, and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our business.

Issues related to our agreements with Titanium Metals Corporation could require us to make significant payments and could disrupt our operations and materially affect our financial results.

We entered into a Conversion Services Agreement and an Access and Security Agreement with Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET) in November 2006 that provide for the performance of certain titanium conversion services through November 2026. In 2012, TIMET was acquired by Precision Castparts Corp. which owns Special Metals Corporation, a direct competitor of ours. Events of default under the Conversion Services Agreement include (a) a change in control in which the successor does not assume the agreement, (b) a violation by us of certain non-compete obligations relating to the manufacture and conversion of titanium and (c) failure to meet agreed-upon delivery and quality requirements. If an event of default under the Conversion Services Agreement occurs, TIMET could require us to repay the unearned portion of the $50.0 million fee paid to us by TIMET when the agreement was signed, plus liquidated damages of $25.0 million. Our obligations to pay these amounts to TIMET are secured by a security interest in our four-high Steckel rolling mill, through which we process a substantial amount of our products. In addition, the Access and Security Agreement with TIMET includes, among other terms, an access right that would allow TIMET to use certain of our operating assets, including the four-high mill, to perform titanium conversion services in the event of our bankruptcy or the acceleration of our indebtedness. Exercise by TIMET of its rights under its security interest following a default and non-payment of the amounts provided in the Conversion Services Agreement or exercise of the access rights under the Access and Security Agreement could cause significant disruption in our Kokomo operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, the Conversion Services Agreement contains a requirement that we reserve a significant amount of capacity exclusively for TIMET.  That agreement does not contain a volume commitment on TIMET’s part.  The agreement also severely limits our ability to manufacture titanium, using the 4 high rolling mill, for any customer other than TIMET.  Our levels of business with TIMET have fluctuated.  Should TIMET underutilize its reserved capacity, we would not be able to reallocate that capacity during the life of this contract, which could negatively impact our business.  

Our operations could result in injury to our workers or third parties.

Our manufacturing operations could result in harm to our workers or third parties in our facilities.  Our manufacturing processes involve the use of heavy equipment, vehicles and chemicals, among other matters, that could lead to harm, injury, death or illness.  In addition to harm to individuals, any such occurrences could result in reputational harm, adverse effects on employee morale, litigation and other costs, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business.  

Although collective bargaining agreements are in place for certain employees, union or labor disputes could still disrupt the manufacturing process.

Our operations rely heavily on our skilled employees. Any labor shortage, disruption or stoppage caused by any deterioration in employee relations or difficulties in the renegotiation of labor contracts could reduce our operating margins and income. Approximately 57% of our full-time U.S. employees are affiliated with unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Company entered into two collective bargaining agreements with the United Steel Workers of America which cover eligible hourly employees at the Company’s Arcadia, Louisiana and Kokomo, Indiana facilities. The bargaining agreement which covers eligible hourly employees in the Kokomo, Indiana operations will expire on June 30, 2023.  Failure to negotiate new labor agreements when required could result in a work stoppage at one or more of our facilities. In addition, other Company facilities could be subject to union organizing activity. Although we believe that our labor relations have generally been satisfactory, it is possible that we could become subject to additional work rules imposed by agreements with labor unions, or that work stoppages or other labor disturbances could occur in the future,

23

any of which could reduce our operating margins and income and place us at a disadvantage relative to non-union competitors.  

Product liability and product warranty risks could adversely affect our operating results.

We produce many critical products for commercial and military aircraft, industrial gas turbines, chemical processing plants and pharmaceutical production facilities.  Failure of our products could give rise to potential substantial product liability and other damage claims as well as reputational harm. We maintain insurance addressing this risk, but our insurance coverage may not be adequate or insurance may not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us.

Additionally, we manufacture our products to strict contractually-established specifications using complex manufacturing processes. If we fail to meet the contractual requirements for a product, we may be subject to warranty costs to repair or replace the product itself and additional costs related to customers’ damages or the investigation and inspection of non-complying products. These costs are generally not insured.

Risks Related to our Research and Technology Activities

Failure to successfully develop, commercialize, market and sell new applications and new products could adversely affect our business.

We believe that our proprietary alloys, technology, applications development, technical services and metallurgical manufacturing expertise provide us with a competitive advantage over other high-performance alloy producers. Our ability to maintain this competitive advantage depends on our ability to continue to offer products and technical services that have equal or better performance characteristics than competing products at competitive prices. Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to address the increasingly demanding needs of our customers by inventing new alloys, enhancing the properties of our existing alloys, timely developing new applications for our existing and new alloys, and timely developing, commercializing, marketing and selling new alloys and products. If we are not successful in these efforts, or if our new alloys/products and product enhancements do not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance, our business could be negatively affected.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

We rely on a combination of confidentiality, invention assignment and other types of agreements and trade secret, trademark and patent law to establish, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. Our efforts in regard to these measures may be inadequate, however, to prevent others from misappropriating our intellectual property rights. In addition, laws in some non-U.S. countries affecting intellectual property are uncertain in their application, which can affect the scope or enforceability of our intellectual property rights. Any of these events or factors could diminish or cause us to lose the competitive advantages associated with our intellectual property, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Our Cybersecurity Activities

We are subject to risks relating to our cybersecurity measures and to misappropriation of information generally.

We have put in place a number of systems, processes and practices designed to protect against intentional or unintentional misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operations including unauthorized access to our networks, servers and data, encryption of network access and the introduction of malware. Despite our cybersecurity efforts, we could be subject to breaches of security systems which may result in unauthorized access, misappropriation, corruption or disruption of the information we are trying to protect, in which case we could suffer material harm. For example, access to our proprietary information regarding new alloy formulations would allow our competitors to use that information in the development of competing products. Current employees have, and former employees may have, access to a significant amount of information regarding our Company which could be disclosed to our competitors or otherwise used to harm us. Any misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

24

Our information technology systems could be subject to attack.  

Our information technology systems could be subject to sabotage by employees or third parties, including attacks in which the systems could be shut down with a demand for payment of “ransom”, which could slow or stop production or otherwise adversely affect our business. Additionally, outside service providers could be subject to attack which could inhibit those providers’ abilities to provide necessary services to us.  Any such attack could disrupt our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We depend on our information technology infrastructure to support the current and future information requirements of our operations which exposes us to risk.

Management relies on our information technology infrastructure, including hardware, network, software, people and processes, to provide useful information to support assessments and conclusions about operating performance. Our inability to produce relevant or reliable measures of operating performance in an efficient, cost-effective and well-controlled fashion may have significant negative impacts on our business.  We continue to evaluate options to further upgrade our systems, including an implementation to a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system.  A transition to a critical system could result in disruptions which could have a significant adverse impact on our business.  

Risks Related to Our Finance Activities

We value our inventory using the FIFO method, which could put pressure on our margins.

The cost of our inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Under the FIFO inventory costing method, the cost of materials included in cost of sales may be different than the current market price at the time of sale of finished product due to the length of time from the acquisition of raw material to the sale of the finished product.  In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first-out method.  This could result in compression of the gross margin on our product sales.  

Changes in tax rules and regulations, or interpretations thereof, may adversely affect our effective tax rates.

We are a U.S. based company with customers and suppliers in foreign countries. We import various raw materials used in our production processes, and we export goods to our foreign customers. The United States, the European Commission, countries in the EU, including the United Kingdom, and other countries where we do business have been considering changes inmay change relevant tax, border tax, accounting and other laws, regulations and interpretations, that may unfavorably impact our effective tax rate

19


or result in other costs to us.  In addition, the Company has deferred tax assets on its balance sheet which could be subjected to a one time unfavorable impactimpacts if tax rates are reduced.reduced, such as those that occurred at the end of calendar year 2017.  

We could be required to make additional contributions to our defined benefit pension plans or recognize higher related expense in our statement of operations as a result of adverse changes in interest rates and the capital markets.

FailureOur estimates of liabilities and expenses for pension benefits incorporate significant assumptions, including the rate used to successfully develop, commercialize, marketdiscount the future estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and sell new applicationsseveral assumptions relating to the employee workforce (salary increases, retirement age and new productsmortality). We currently expect that we will be required to make future minimum contributions to our defined benefit pension plans. Many domestic and international competitors do not provide defined benefit plans and/or retiree health plans (which we do provide), and those competitors may have a resulting cost advantage.  A decline in the value of plan investments in the future, an increase in costs or liabilities, including those caused by the lowering of the rate used to discount future payouts, or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern pension plan funding could adversely affectmaterially change the timing and amount of required pension funding or the amount of related expense recognized in our business.

We believe that our proprietary alloys and metallurgical manufacturing expertise provide usstatement of operations. The Company mitigates this risk with a competitive advantage over other high‑performance alloy producers. Our abilityglide path strategy that utilized liability driven investing (LDI) which shifts a greater concentration towards fixed income securities as the funding percentage increases.  The LDI approach is designed to maintain this competitive advantage depends on our ability to continue to offer products that have equal or better performance characteristics than competing products at competitive prices. Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to addressmatch the increasingly demanding needs of our customers by enhancing the properties of our existing alloys, by timely developing new applications for our existing products,duration and by timely developing, commercializing, marketing and selling new products. If we are not successful in these efforts, or if our new products and product enhancements do not adequately meet the requirementsrisk of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance, our business could be negatively affected.

We are subject to risks relating to our cybersecurity measures and to misappropriation of information generally.

We have put in place a number of systems, processes and practices designed to protect against intentional or unintentional misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operations. These include, for example,fixed income securities within the appropriate encryption of network access. Despite such efforts, we are subject to breaches of security systems which may result in unauthorized access, misappropriation, corruption or disruptionU.S. pension plan with that of the information we are trying to protect,US pension benefit obligation.  Our mitigation strategies

25

may not be successful, in which case we could suffer material harm. Accessmay be required to our proprietary information regarding new alloy formulations would allow our competitorsfund additional contributions to use that informationthe plan.  A requirement to fund any deficit created in the development of competing products. Current employees have, and former employees may have, access to a significant amount of information regarding our operations which could be disclosed to our competitors or otherwise used to harm us. In addition, our systems could be subject to sabotage by employees or third parties, which could slow or stop production or otherwise adversely affect our business. Any misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operationsfuture could have a material adverse effect on our business.

An interruptionThe carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets may not be recoverable.

Goodwill and other intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. We review these assets at least annually for impairment. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in energy servicesperformance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations and a variety of other factors. A sustained downturn may cause manufacturing curtailmentsresult in the carrying value of our goodwill or shutdowns.other intangible assets exceeding their fair value, which may require us to recognize impairment to those assets.  Any future impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our business.  

We may not be able to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.

The strength of the global economy can have a significant impact on the availability of financing from capital markets.  Terms for borrowers could become significantly less favorable.  As a result of this and other issues, we may not be able to obtain needed financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Because we rely upon third partieson financing to fund our working capital requirements, higher finance costs or an inability to obtain financing could negatively impact our business and financial results.

Our working capital requirements may negatively affect our liquidity and capital resources.

Our working capital requirements can vary significantly, depending in part on the timing of our delivery obligations under various customer contracts and the payment terms with our customers and suppliers. In the past year, the Company experienced a significant increase in order entry and production lead times have been extended which has increased the length of time from the time that we accept a customer order to the time that cash is collected from the sale of material.  If our working capital needs exceed our cash flows from operations, we would look to our cash balances and availability for borrowings under our supplyexisting credit facility to satisfy those needs, as well as potential sources of additional capital, which may not be available on satisfactory terms and in adequate amounts, if at all.

Risks Related to Our Global Operations

Political and social turmoil including global war could adversely affect our business.

Political and social turmoil as well as war, could put pressure on economic conditions in the United States and worldwide. These political, social and economic conditions could make it difficult for us, our suppliers and our customers to forecast accurately and plan future business activities, and could adversely affect the financial condition of our suppliers and customers and affect customer decisions as to the amount and timing of purchases from us.  The Russian invasion of Ukraine has let to concerns of energy resources consumedand food shortages that could severely disrupt the economy in the manufacture ofregions that we engage in business.   As a result, our products. The prices for and availability of electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resourcesbusiness could be materially adversely affected.

We are subject to volatile market conditions. These market conditions oftenrisks associated with global trade matters

We are affected by politicalsubject to macroeconomic downturns and economic factors beyond our control. Disruptionsgeopolitical events in the United States and abroad that may affect the general economic climate, our performance and the demand of our customers.  The Russian invasion of Ukraine had resulted in trade restrictions with companies operating in Russia which forces us and other companies to source raw materials from other countries which can lead to insufficient supply of energyor higher prices for us. Transportation and logistics resources, could temporarily impair our ability to manufacture products for customers. Further, increasesincluding shipping and transportation services, have been in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors,short supply, which has had, and may continue to adversely affect our business. To the extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have, an adverse effect on our business. Further, any global trade wars or similar economic turmoil, including new or existing tariffs, could adversely affect our business.  In past years, the U.S. and China have imposed tariffs on large amounts of products imported into each of the countries from one another.  A “trade war” or other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements or policies has the potential to adversely impact demand for our products, our costs, customers, suppliers and/or the U.S. economy or certain sections thereof, and, thus, adversely affect our business.  

26

Our competitors outside of the United States may not be subject to these tariffs or other measures, and therefore, could have a significant competitive advantage over us in that respect. 

A global recession or disruption in global financial markets could adversely affect us.

A global recession or disruption in the global financial markets, including any significant tariff impositions or trade wars, presents risks and uncertainties that we cannot predict.  During recessionary economic conditions or financial market disruptions, we face risks that may include:

declines in revenues and profitability from reduced or delayed orders by our customers;
reductions in credit availability due to governmental regulations on banking institutions and other concerns; and
increases in corporate tax rates to finance government spending programs.

The risks inherent in our international operations may adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

We anticipate that we will continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from operations in international markets. As we continue to expand internationally, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel for our direct sales efforts and retain distributors and train their personnel in countries where language, cultural or regulatory impediments may exist. Distributors, regulators or government agencies may not continue to accept our products, services and business practices, and costs related to international trade have increased and may continue to increase. In addition, we purchase raw materials on the international market. The sale and shipment of our products and services across international borders, as well as the purchase of raw materials from international sources, subject us to the trade regulations of various jurisdictions, including tariffs and other possible punitive measures. The Russian invasion of Ukraine led us to cease voluntarily the procurement of nickel from Russia.  Compliance with such regulations is costly. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could impact us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our shipping, sales and service activities. Our international sales operations expose us and our representatives, agents and distributors to risks inherent in operating in foreign jurisdictions, any one or more of which may adversely affect our business, including:

our ability to obtain, and the costs associated with obtaining, U.S. export licenses and other required export or import licenses or approvals;
changes in duties and tariffs, quotas, taxes, trade restrictions, license obligations and other non-tariff barriers to trade;
policy changes affecting the market for our products;
burdens of complying with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations;
business practices or laws favoring local companies;
fluctuations in foreign currencies;
restrictive trade policies of foreign governments;
longer payment cycles and difficulties collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;

27

difficulties in enforcing or defending agreements and intellectual property rights; and
foreign political or economic conditions.

Any material decrease in our international revenues or inability to expand our international operations as a result of these or other factors would adversely impact our business.

Export sales could present risks to our business.

Export sales account for a significant percentage of our revenues, and we believe this will continue to be the case in the future. Risks associated with export sales include: political and economic instability, including weak conditions in the world’s economies; accounts receivable collection; export controls; changes in legal and regulatory requirements; policy changes affecting the markets for our products; changes in tax laws and tariffs; trade duties; and exchange rate fluctuations (which may affect sales to international customers and the value of profits earned on export sales when converted into dollars). Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Legal and Environmental Activities

We may be adversely affectedimpacted by costs related to environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, costs and other liabilities.

We are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the environment, the storage, handling, use, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the health and safety of our employees. Under these laws and regulations, we may be held liable for all costs arising out of any release of hazardous substances on, under or from any of our current or former properties or any off‑siteoff-site location to which we sent or arranged to be sent wastes for disposal or treatment, and such costs may be material. We could also be held liable for any and all consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or other hazardous substances that may be attributable to our products or other environmental damage. In addition, some of these laws and regulations require our facilities to operate under permits that are subject to renewal or modification. These laws, regulations and permits can require expensive pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment. Violations of these laws, regulations or permits can also result in the imposition of substantial penalties, permit revocations and/or facility shutdowns.

20


We have received permits from the environmental regulatory authorities in Indiana and North Carolina to close and to provide post‑closurepost-closure monitoring and care for certain areas of our Kokomo and Mountain Home facilities that were used for the storage and disposal of wastes, some of which are classified as hazardous under applicable regulations. We are required to monitor groundwater and to continue post‑closurepost-closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, we are aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater and additional corrective action could be required. Additionally, it is possible that we could be required to undertake other corrective action for any other solid waste management unit or other conditions existing or determined to exist at our facilities. We are unable to estimate the costs of any further corrective action, if required. However, the costs of future corrective action at these or any other current or former sites could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may also incur liability for alleged environmental damages associated with the off‑siteoff-site transportation and disposal of hazardous substances. Our operations generate hazardous substances, many of which we accumulate at our facilities for subsequent transportation and disposal or recycling by third parties off‑site.off-site. Generators of hazardous substances which are transported to disposal sites where environmental problems are alleged to exist are subject to liability under CERCLA and state counterparts. In addition, we may have generated hazardous substances disposed of at sites which are subject to CERCLA or equivalent state law remedial action. We have been named as a potentially responsible party at one site. CERCLA imposes strict, joint and several liabilities for investigatory and cleanup costs upon hazardous substance generators, site owners and operators and other potentially responsible parties regardless of fault. If we are named as a potentially responsible party at other sites in the future, the costs associated with those future sites could have a material adverse effect on our business.

28

Environmental laws are complex, change frequently and have tended to become increasingly stringent over time.time, including those relating to greenhouse gases. While we have budgeted for future capital and operating expenditures to comply with environmental laws, changes in any environmental law may directly or indirectly increase our costs of compliance and liabilities arising from any past or future releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances and may materially adversely affect our business. See “Business—Environmental Matters.”

Increased regulation of greenhouse gases or other environmental issues could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Regulation or some form of legislation aimed at regulating environmental issues is currently being considered globally.  As a high‑performance alloy manufacturer, we will be affected, both directly and indirectly, if environmental legislation, is enacted, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Government regulation is increasing and if we fail to comply with such increased regulation, we could be subject to fines, penalties and expenditures.

The United States Congress has adopted several significant pieces of legislation, such as the Sarbanes‑OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd‑FrankDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, including conflict minerals regulations, that affect our operation as well as those of other publicly traded companies. In addition, regulations relating to data protection and privacy law have become increasingly stringent.  We may be subject to significant fines and penalties if we failFailure to comply with these laws or their implementing regulations, and the increasingly stringentsuch regulations could require us to make additional unforeseen expenditures. Any suchresult in fines, penalties or expenditures which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Regulations related to conflict minerals could adversely impact our business.

The Dodd‑Frank Act and related SEC rules require disclosure of the use of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, known as conflict minerals, in products manufactured by public companies. These rules require a reasonable country of origin inquiry to determine whether such minerals originated from the Democratic Republic of Congo (the “DRC”) or an adjoining country and, under some circumstances, whether such minerals helped finance the armed conflict in the DRC. Conflict minerals disclosures are required to be filed annually. There are costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including costs to determine the origin of conflict minerals used in our products.  Also, we may face disqualification as a supplier for customers and reputational challenges if the procedures we implement do not satisfy

21


all concerned stakeholders. In addition, these rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in our products.

Our business is affected by federal rules, regulations and orders applicable to some of our customers who are government contractors.

A number of our products are manufactured and sold to customers who are parties to U.S. government contracts or subcontracts. Consequently, we are indirectly subject to various federal rules, regulations and orders applicable to government contractors. From time to time, we are also subject to government inquiries and investigations of our business practices due to our participation in government programs. These inquiries and investigations are costly and consumingconsume a substantial amount of internal resources.resources, and costs are expected to increase. Violations of applicable government rules and regulations could result in civil liability, in cancellation or suspension of existing contracts or in ineligibility for future contracts or subcontracts funded in whole or in part with federal funds, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected by climate change and related matters.

We analyze climate change risks in two separate categories: transition risks and physical risks.  Transition risks are those risks relating to the transition of the global economy to a focus on more climate-friendly technologies.  This transition could have adverse financial impacts on us in several ways.  For instance, more stringent environmental policies or regulations could lead to increased expenses relating to green-house gas emissions or other emissions that could increase our operating costs.  Enhanced emissions-reporting or shifting technology could require us to write off or impair assets or retire existing assets early. Increased environmental mandates could also increase our exposure to litigation.  We could be required to make additional contributionsincur increased costs and significant capital investment to transition to lower emissions technology.  In addition, overall market shifts could increase costs of our raw materials and cause unexpected shifts in energy costs.  Market shifts could also bring a prompt change in our overall revenue mix and sources, resulting in reduced demand in alloys and a decrease in revenues.  Focus on sustainability has increased, and the entire industry could be stigmatized as not friendly to the environment, which could adversely affect our reputation and our business, including due to difficulties in employee hiring and retention and our ability to access capital. Any of these matters could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Physical risks from climate change that could affect our business include acute weather events such as floods, tornadoes or other severe weather and ongoing changes such as rising temperatures or extreme variability in weather patterns. These events could lead to increased capital costs from damage to our defined benefit pension plans as a resultfacilities, increased insurance premiums or reduced revenue from decreased production capacity based on supply chain interruptions.   Any of adverse changes in interest rates and the capital markets.

Our estimates of liabilities and expenses for pension benefits incorporate significant assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future estimated liability, the long‑term rate of return on plan assets and several assumptions relating to the employee workforce (salary increases, retirement age and mortality). We currently expect that we will be required to make future minimum contributions to our defined benefit pension plans. A decline in the value of plan investments in the future, an increase in costs or liabilities or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern pension plan funding could materially change the timing and amount of required pension funding. A requirement to fund any deficit created in the futurethese events could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled and experienced personnel, our ability to effectively manage and expand our business, will be harmed.

Our success largely depends on the skills, experience and efforts of our officers and other key employees who may terminate their employment at any time. The loss of any of our senior management team could harm our business. The announcement of the loss of one of our key employees could negatively affect our stock price. Our ability to retain our skilled workforce and our success in attracting and hiring new skilled employees will be a critical factor in determining whether we will be successful in the future. We face challenges in hiring, training, managing and retaining employees in certain areas including metallurgical researchers, equipment technicians and sales and marketing staff. If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled employees, our new product and alloy development and commercialization could be delayed and our marketing and sales efforts could be hindered, which would adversely impact our business.

The risks inherent in our international operations may adversely impact our revenues,financial condition or results of operations and financial condition.operations.

We anticipate that we will continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from operations in international markets. As we continue to expand internationally, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel for our direct sales efforts and retain distributors and train their personnel in countries where language, cultural or regulatory impediments may exist. Distributors, regulators or government agencies may not continue to accept our products, services and business practices. In addition, we purchase raw materials on the international market. The sale and shipment of our products and services across international borders, as well as the purchase of raw materials from international sources, subject us to the trade regulations of various jurisdictions. Compliance with such regulations is costly. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could impact us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our shipping, sales and service activities.

22


Our international sales operations expose us and our representatives, agents and distributors to risks inherent in operating in foreign jurisdictions any one or more of which may adversely affect our business, including:

·

our ability to obtain, and the costs associated with obtaining, U.S. export licenses and other required export or import licenses or approvals;

·

changes in duties and tariffs, taxes, trade restrictions, license obligations and other non‑tariff barriers to trade;

·

burdens of complying with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations;

·

business practices or laws favoring local companies;

·

fluctuations in foreign currencies;

·

restrictive trade policies of foreign governments;

·

longer payment cycles and difficulties collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;

·

difficulties in enforcing or defending agreements and intellectual property rights; and

·

foreign political or economic conditions.

Any material decrease in our international revenues or inability to expand our international operations as a result of these or other factors would adversely impact our business.

Export sales could present risks to our business.

Export sales account for a significant percentage of our revenues, and we believe this will continue to be the case in the future. Risks associated with export sales include: political and economic instability, including weak conditions in the world’s economies; accounts receivable collection; export controls; changes in legal and regulatory requirements; policy changes affecting the markets for our products; changes in tax laws and tariffs; trade duties; and exchange rate fluctuations (which may affect sales to international customers and the value of profits earned on export sales when converted into dollars). Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our business.

Although collective bargaining agreements are in place for certain employees, union or labor disputes could still disrupt the manufacturing process.

Our operations rely heavily on our skilled employees. Any labor shortage, disruption or stoppage caused by any deterioration in employee relations or difficulties in the renegotiation of labor contracts could reduce our operating margins and income. Approximately 52% percent of our U.S. employees are affiliated with unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Company entered into two collective bargaining agreements with the United Steel Workers of America which cover eligible hourly employees at the Company’s Arcadia, Louisiana, Kokomo, Indiana and Lebanon, Indiana facilities. Failure to negotiate new labor agreements when required could result in a work stoppage at one or more of our facilities. Although we believe that our labor relations have generally been satisfactory, it is possible that we could become subject to additional work rules imposed by agreements with labor unions, or that work stoppages or other labor disturbances could occur in the future, any of which could reduce our operating margins and income and place us at a disadvantage relative to non‑union competitors.

Product liability and product warranty risks could adversely affect our operating results.

We produce many critical products for commercial and military aircraft and for industrial gas turbines. Failure of our products could give rise to substantial product liability and other damage claims. We maintain insurance addressing this risk, but there can be no assurance that the insurance coverage will be adequate or will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us.

Additionally, we manufacture our products to strict contractually‑established specifications using complex manufacturing processes. If we fail to meet the contractual requirements for a product, we may be subject to warranty costs

23


to repair or replace the product itself and additional costs related to customers’ damages or the investigation and inspection of non‑complying products. These costs are generally not insured.

Our business subjects us to risk of litigation claims, as a routine matter, and this risk increases the potential for a lossincluding those that might not be covered by insurance.

Litigation claims may relate to the conduct of our business, including claims pertaining to product liability, commercial disputes, employment actions, employee benefits, compliance with domestic and federal laws and personal injury. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, we might not prevail on claims made against us in the lawsuits that we

29

currently face, and additional claims may be made against us in the future. The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to us. The resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business.business, particularly in the event that adverse outcomes are not covered by insurance.  

Our insurance may not provide enough coverage.coverage or may not be available on terms that are acceptable to us.

We maintain various forms of insurance, including insurance covering claims related to our properties and risks associated with our operations. Our existing property and liability insurance coverages contain exclusions and limitations on coverage. From time-to-time, in connection with renewals of insurance, we have experienced additional exclusions and limitations on coverage, larger self-insured retentions and deductibles and significantly higher premiums. As a result, inIn the future, our insurance coverage may not cover claims to the extent that it has in the past and the costs that we incur to procure insurance may increase significantly, either of which could have an adverse effect on our business.

We depend on  Furthermore, the insurance industry, or our Information Technology (IT) infrastructurecarriers specifically, may continue to support the current and future information requirements of our operationsalter their business models in manners that are unfavorable to us, resulting in insufficient or more costly coverage, which exposes us to risk.

Management relies on IT infrastructure, including hardware, network, software, people and processes, to provide useful information to support assessments and conclusions about operating performance. We are in the process of implementing an IT system change. If we do not successfully or timely implement the new system or it does not operate as envisioned, our business could be harmed. Our inability to produce relevant or reliable measures of operating performance in an efficient, cost‑effective and well‑controlled fashion may have significant negative impacts on our business.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

General Risk Factors

Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows have been and may be adversely affected by pandemics, epidemics or other public health emergencies.  

Our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and stock price have been, and may be in the future, adversely affected by pandemics, epidemics or other public health emergencies, such as the global outbreak of COVID-19, and the responses of governmental authorities to those emergencies.  In March 2020, the World Health Organization characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic, and the President of the United States declared the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency. The outbreak resulted in governments around the world implementing increasingly stringent measures to help control the spread of the virus, including quarantines, “shelter in place” and “stay at home” orders, travel restrictions, business curtailments, school closures, and other measures. In addition, governments and central banks in several parts of the world have enacted fiscal and monetary stimulus measures to counteract the impacts of COVID-19.

An interruption in energy services may cause manufacturing curtailments or shutdowns.

We rely on a combinationupon third parties for our supply of confidentiality, invention assignment and other types of agreements and trade secret, trademark and patent law to establish, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. Our effortsenergy resources consumed in regard to these measures may be inadequate, however, to prevent others from misappropriating our intellectual property rights. In addition, laws in some non-U.S. countries affecting intellectual property are uncertain in their application, which can affect the scope or enforceabilitymanufacture of our intellectual property rights. Anyproducts. The potential for curtailment of these events or factors could diminish or cause us to lose the competitive advantages associated with our intellectual property,certain energy resources exists which could have a material adverse effect on our business.  The prices for and availability of electricity, natural gas, hydrogen, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions. These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors, weather issues and other factors, which may be beyond our control. Disruptions in the supply of energy resources could impair our ability to manufacture products for customers. Further, increases in energy costs, which are outside of our control, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, has and may continue to adversely affect our business. To the extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an adverse effect on our business.

If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled and experienced personnel, our ability to effectively manage and expand our business will be harmed.

Our success largely depends on the skills, experience and efforts of our officers and other key employees who may terminate their employment at any time. The loss of any of our senior management team could harm our business. Our ability to retain our skilled workforce and our success in attracting and hiring new skilled employees will be a critical factor in determining whether we will be successful in the future. We face challenges in hiring, training, managing and retaining employees in certain areas including metallurgical researchers, equipment technicians and sales and marketing staff as well as production and maintenance employees.  We also face hiring challenges relating to the location of our business.  If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled employees, our new product and alloy development and

30

commercialization could be delayed and our marketing and sales efforts could be hindered, which would adversely impact our business.

Healthcare costs, including those related to healthcare legislation, have and may continue to impact our business.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and other legislation relating to healthcare have increased our annual employee healthcare cost obligations.  In addition, costs associated with healthcare generally, including our retiree healthcare plans, are expected to continue to increase. We cannot predict the effect that healthcare legislation or regulation, and the costs of healthcare in general, will ultimately have on our business. However, each year as opportunities arise, programs are being implemented that are intended to drive savings and improve the health status of our population. The current project involves the transition to a new Third Party Administrator (TPA), with added support elements, which will become effective January 1, 2023.

Any significant delay or problems in the expansionany future upgrades of our operations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have undertaken, and may continue to undertake, significant capital projects in order to enhance, expand and/or upgrade our facilities and operational capabilities.capabilities, including rebuilding the A&K line and 4-HI rolling system upgrades. Our ability to achieve the anticipated increased revenues or otherwise realize acceptable returns on these investments or other strategic capital projects that we may undertake is subject to a number of risks, many of which are beyond our control, including the ability of management to ensure the necessary resources are in place to properly execute these projects on time and in accordance with planned costs, the ability of key suppliers to deliver the necessary equipment according to schedule, customer demand (which fluctuates as a result of the cyclical markets in which we operate, as well as other factors) and our ability to implement these projects with minimal impact to our existing operations. In addition, the cost to implement any given strategic capital project ultimately may prove to be greater than originally anticipated. If we are not able to achieve the anticipated results from the implementation of any of our strategic capital projects, or if we incur unanticipated implementation costs or delays, our business may be materially adversely affected.

24


We consider acquisition,acquisitions, joint ventures and other business combination opportunities, as well as possible business unit dispositions, as part of our overall business strategy, which opportunities and dispositions involve uncertainties and potential risks that we cannot predict or anticipate fully.

We intend to continue to strategically position our businesses in order to improve our ability to compete. Strategies we may employ include seeking new or expanding existing specialty market niches for our products, expanding our global presence, acquiring businesses complementary to existing strengths and continually evaluating the performance and strategic fit of our existing business units. From time to time, management of the Company holds discussions with management of other companies to explore acquisitions, joint ventures and other business combination opportunities as well as possible business unit dispositions.combination. As a result, the relative makeup of our business is subject to change. Acquisitions, joint ventures and other business combinations involve various inherent risks, such as: assessing accurately the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent and other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition or other transaction candidates; the potential loss of key personnel of an acquired business; integration of technological systems; our ability to achieve identified financial and operating synergies anticipated to result from an acquisition or other transaction; diversion of the attention of certain management personnel from their day-to-day duties; and unanticipated changes in business and economic conditions affecting an acquisition or other transaction. International acquisitions or business combinations could be affected by many additional factors, including, without limitation, export controls, exchange rate fluctuations, domestic and foreign political conditions and deterioration in domestic and foreign economic conditions.

A global recession or disruption in global financial markets could adversely affect us.

A global recession or disruption in the global financial markets presents risks and uncertainties that we cannot predict. During the recent recession, we saw a decline in demand for our products due to global economic conditions. During recessionary economic conditions or financial market disruptions, we face risks that may include:

·

declines in revenues and profitability from reduced or delayed orders by our customers;

·

supply problems associated with any financial constraints faced by our suppliers;

·

restrictions on our access to credit sources;

·

reductions to our banking group or to our committed credit availability due to combinations or failures of financial institutions; and

·

increases in corporate tax rates to finance government spending programs.

Political and social turmoil could adversely affect our business.

The war on terrorism, as well as political and social turmoil, could put pressure on economic conditions in the United States and worldwide. These political, social and economic conditions could make it difficult for us, our suppliers and our customers to forecast accurately and plan future business activities, and could adversely affect the financial condition of our suppliers and customers and affect customer decisions as to the amount and timing of purchases from us. As a result, our business could be materially adversely affected.

The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets may not be recoverable.

Goodwill and other intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. We review these assets at least annually for impairment. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations and a variety of other factors. Any future impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Healthcare legislation has and may continue to impact our business.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively the “Acts”), signed into law in 2010, have increased our annual employee healthcare cost obligations and are expected to continue to increase our annual employee healthcare cost obligations going forward.  We cannot predict the effect that this legislation, or any future state or federal healthcare legislation or regulation, will ultimately have on our business.

25


Our working capital requirements may negatively affect our liquidity and capital resources.

Our working capital requirements can vary significantly, depending in part on the timing of our delivery obligations under various customer contracts and the payment terms with our customers and suppliers. If our working capital needs exceed our cash flows from operations, we would look to our cash balances and availability for borrowings under our existing credit facility to satisfy those needs, as well as potential sources of additional capital, which may not be available on satisfactory terms and in adequate amounts, if at all.

Risks Related to Shares of Our Common Stock

Our stock price is subject to fluctuations that may not be related to our performance as a result of being traded on a public exchange.

The stock market can be highly volatile. The market price of our common stock is likely to be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their stock, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects.our prospective outlook of our business. The price of our common stock could be subject to

31

wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section and those listed below:

·

fluctuations in the market price of nickel (or other raw materials, such as cobalt, molybdenum or energy;

ferrochrome) or energy as well as increases in value added vendor premiums;

·

market conditions in the end markets into which our customers sell their products, principally aerospace, power generation and chemical processing;

·

implementation of barriers to free trade between the United States and other countries;

announcements of technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;

·

the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to us;

·

announcements by us of acquisitions, alliances, joint development efforts or corporate partnerships in the high‑temperaturehigh-temperature resistant alloy and corrosion‑resistantcorrosion-resistant alloy markets;

·

market conditions in the technology, manufacturing or other growth sectors; and

sectors

·

financial performance of our competitors; and

rumors relating to us or our competitors.

PaymentWe may not continue to pay dividends at the current rate or at all.

Any future payment of dividends, will depend on our future financial condition and performance.

Although our Board of Directors currently intends to continue the payment of regular quarterly cash dividends on shares of our common stock,including the timing and amount of future dividendsthereof, will depend onupon our Board of Director’s assessment of the Board’s assessment ofeconomic environment, our operations, financial condition, projected liabilities, compliance with contractual restrictions in our credit agreement and restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to declare dividends at the same or similar rates.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by‑lawsby-laws could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could deter or prevent a change in control.

Some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by‑laws,by-laws, as well as Delaware statutes, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control. These provisions, including those regulating the nomination of directors and those allowing the Board of Directors to issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval, may make it more difficult for other persons, without the approval of our Board of Directors, to launch takeover attempts that a stockholder might consider to be in his or her best interest. These provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Our business could be adversely affected by actions of proxy advisory firms, large institutional shareholders and activist shareholders in response to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters.

An organization’s reputation is built on its relationship with employees, customers, suppliers, investors and the community they operate within.  Companies across a variety of industries, including the metals industry, are experiencing an increase in shareholder activism, particularly shareholder proposals regarding environmental sustainability, diversity and inclusion, and governance matters. .  If we are required to respond to shareholder proposals (including the implementation of any proposals), proxy contents or other actions by activist shareholder, we could incur significant expense, disruptions to our operations and diversion of the attention of management and our employees.  Perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, strategy or leadership as a consequence of activist shareholders initiatives may result in reputational damage, which could negatively impact relationships with customers and strategic partners, impair our ability to attract and retain employees, and cause volatility in our stock price. 

32

In addition, both Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis, two primary proxy advisory firms, as well as large institutional investors, have emphasized the importance of disclosure regarding the environmental, social and governance actions taken by publicly traded companies.  If we are unable to achieve acceptable scores relating to these matters, our stock price and reputation may be affected.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff CommentsComments

There are no unresolved comments by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

26


Item 2.  PropertiesProperties

Manufacturing Facilities.  The Company owns manufacturing facilities in the following locations:

·

Kokomo, Indiana—manufactures and sells all product forms, other than tubular and wire goods;

·

Arcadia, Louisiana—manufactures and sells welded and seamless tubular goods; and

·

Mountain Home, North Carolina—manufactures and sells high‑performancehigh-performance alloy wire.

wire and small diameter bar.

The Kokomo plant, the Company’s primary production facility, is located on approximately 180 acres of industrial property and includes over 1.0 million square feet of building space. There are three sites consisting of (1) a headquarters and research laboratory; (2) primary and secondary melting, continuous annealing furnaces, forge press and several smaller hot mills; and (3) the Company’s four‑highfour-high Steckel rolling mill and sheet product cold working equipment, including two cold striprolling mills and two bright annealthree annealing furnaces.  All alloys and product forms other than tubular and wire goods are produced in Kokomo.

The Arcadia plant is located on approximately 42 acres of land and includes 202,500 square feet of buildings on a single site. Arcadia uses feedstock produced in Kokomo to fabricate welded and seamless high-performance alloy pipe and tubing and purchases extruded tube hollows to produce seamless titanium tubing. Manufacturing processes at Arcadia require cold pilger mills, weld mills, draw benches, annealing furnaces and pickling facilities.

The Mountain Home plant is located on approximately 29 acres of land and includes approximately 100,000 square feet of building space. The Mountain Home facility is primarily used to manufacture finished high‑performancehigh-performance alloy wire. Finished wire products are also warehoused at this facility.

The owned facilities located in the United States are subject to a mortgagenegative pledge which secures the Company’s obligations under its U.S. revolving credit facility with a group of lenders led by Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The credit agreement provides that no liens can encumber the owned real property other than certain permitted encumbrances.  For more information, see Note 78 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K.

Service and Sales Centers.  The service and sales centers, which stock and sell all product forms, contain equipment capable of precision laser and water jet processing services to cut and shape products to customers’ precise specifications.  The Company owns service and sales centers in the following locations:

·

Openshaw, England

·

Lenzburg, Switzerland

The Openshaw plant, located near Manchester, England, consists of approximately 5 acres of land and over 85,000 square feet of buildings on a single site.

33

In addition, the Company leases service and sales centers, which stock and sell all product forms, in the following locations:

·

LaPorte, Indiana

La Mirada, California

·

Houston, Texas

·

Lebanon, Indiana

Windsor, Connecticut

·

LaPorte, Indiana

Shanghai, China

·

Shanghai, China

·

Windsor, Connecticut

Sales Centers.  The Company leases sales centers, which sell all product forms, in the following locations:

·

Paris, France

27


·

Zurich, Switzerland

Singapore

·

Singapore

Milan, Italy

·

Milan, Italy

Tokyo, Japan

·

Tokyo, Japan

On January 1, 2015, the companyCompany entered into a capitalfinance lease agreement for the building that houses the assets and operations of LaPorte Custom Metal Processing (LCMP).  The capitalfinance asset and obligation are recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments.  The asset is included in Property, plant and equipment, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is depreciated over the 20 year lease term.  The long-term component of the capitalfinance lease obligation is included in Long-term obligations (See Note 18. Capital Lease Obligation)Long-term Obligations).

All owned and leased service and sales centers not described in detail above are single site locations and are less than 100,000 square feet, except for the LaPorte service center which is approximately 230,000 square feet.  The Company is currently in the process of modifying its facilities to meet its current and anticipated future business needs.  Consistent therewith, in May 2016, the Company announced the relocation of its Lebanon, Indiana service center operations to LaPorte, Indiana.

Item 3.  Legal ProceedingsProceedings

The Company is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations. Future developments and increasingly stringent regulations could require the Company to make additional unforeseen expenditures for these matters. The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations. Such litigation includes, without limitation, federal and state EEOC administrative and judicial actions, litigation of commercial matters, asbestos litigation and litigation and administrative actions relating to environmental matters. For more information, see “Item 1. Business—Environmental Matters.” Litigation and administrative actions may result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, and the level of future expenditures for legal matters cannot be determined with any degree of certainty.  Nonetheless, based on the facts presently known, management does not expect expenditures for pending legal proceedings to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company is currently, and has in the past been, subject to claims involving personal injuries allegedly relating to its products or processes. For example, the Company is presently involved in two actions involving welding rod‑related injuries, which were filed in California state court against numerous manufacturers, including the Company, in May 2006 and February 2007, respectively, alleging that the welding‑related products of the defendant manufacturers harmed the users of such products through the inhalation of welding fumes containing manganese. The Company is also involved in one action alleging that asbestos at the facilities of the defendant manufacturers harmed the plaintiff who worked in the facilities. The Company believes that it has defenses to these allegations and that, if the Company were found liable, the cases would not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

2834


Part

Part II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market (“NASDAQ”) and traded under the symbol “HAYN”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for the Company’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ as well as dividends declared.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

High

    

Low

    

Dividend

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended September 30, 2017

 

$

36.30

 

$

29.60

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended June 30, 2017

 

$

42.97

 

$

34.90

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended March 31, 2017

 

$

44.90

 

$

34.54

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended December 31, 2016

 

$

47.26

 

$

31.14

 

$

0.22

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended September 30, 2016

 

$

41.27

 

$

32.13

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended June 30, 2016

 

$

39.60

 

$

26.05

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended March 31, 2016

 

$

39.98

 

$

29.02

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended December 31, 2015

 

$

42.03

 

$

34.12

 

$

0.22

 

The range of the Company’s closing common stock price on NASDAQ from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 was $29.60 to $47.26. The closing price of the common stock was $35.91 on September 30, 2017.

As of November 1, 2017,2022, there were approximately 5354 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

Payment of quarterly dividends is permitted under the Company’s existing financing agreement, although the U.S. revolving credit facility requires prior notice to the agent, and limits the amount of such quarterly dividends to $20.0 million in any fiscal year if the availability of borrowings under the facility is less than 20% of the maximum amount available for borrowing thereunder. Additional restrictions apply to special dividends if availability under the credit agreement is less than 20% of the maximum available credit.  While it is the Company’s intention to continue to payThe Company has historically paid quarterly cash dividends for fiscal 2018 and beyond, anydividends.  Any decision to pay future cash dividends will be made by the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon ourthe Company’s earnings, financial condition, cash position and other factors.  The Company may pay quarterly cash dividends up to $3.5 million per fiscal quarter so long as the Company is not in default under its existing credit facility.

Set forth below is information regarding the Company’s stock repurchases during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, comprising shares repurchased by the Company from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations with respect to share-based compensation.

Period

Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased

Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit

Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value[000's]) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

July 1-31, 2022

    

    

$

    

    

$

    

August 1-31, 2022

50

43.90

September 1-30, 2022

11,538

38.68

Total

11,588

$

38.70

Cumulative Total Stockholder Return

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock to the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index, S&P MidCap 400 Index, and Peer GroupGroups for each of the last five fiscal years ended September 30. The cumulative total return assumes an investment of $100 on September 30, 20122017 and the reinvestment of any dividends during the period. The Russell 2000 is a broad‑basedbroad-based index that includes smaller market capitalization stocks. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is the most widely used index for mid‑sizedmid-sized companies. Management believes that the S&P MidCap 400 is representative of companies with similar market and economic characteristics to Haynes. Furthermore, wemanagement also believebelieves the Russell 2000 Index is representative of the Company’s current market capitalization status and this index is also provided on a comparable basis. The companies included in the Peer Group Index are:Index: Allegheny Technologies, Inc., Howmet Aerospace Inc.(formerly Arconic, Inc)., Carpenter Technology Corp., Commercial Metals, Inc.,  Insteel Industries, Inc., Kaiser Aluminum Corporation, Materion Corporation, Olympic Steel, Inc., and Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., A. M. Castle & Co. and Carpenter Technology Corp. Management believes that the companies included in the Peer Group,Groups, taken as a whole, provide a meaningful comparison in terms of competition, product offerings and other relevant factors. The total stockholder return for the peer groupgroups is weighted according to the respective issuer’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period.

2935


Graphic

    

2017

    

2018

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Haynes International, Inc.

 

100.00

101.16

105.00

51.90

116.57

112.43

Russell 2000

 

100.00

115.24

104.99

105.40

155.66

119.08

S&P MidCap 400

 

100.00

114.21

111.36

108.96

156.55

132.68

Peer Group

 

100.00

103.80

102.46

76.02

136.85

142.88

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Among Haynes, The Russell 2000 Index, The S&P MidCap 400

Index and our Peer Group


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2012

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Haynes International, Inc.

 

100.00

 

88.35

 

91.33

 

76.68

 

77.21

 

76.51

 

Russell 2000

 

100.00

 

130.06

 

135.17

 

136.85

 

158.02

 

190.80

 

S&P MidCap 400

 

100.00

 

127.68

 

142.77

 

144.76

 

166.95

 

196.19

 

Peer Group

 

100.00

 

105.09

 

103.69

 

50.49

 

67.31

 

84.94

 

Item 6.  Selected Financial DataReserved

This information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations

Please refer to page 2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information.

Overview of Business

The Company is one of the world’s largest producers of high-performance nickel- and cobalt-based alloys in flat product form, such as sheet, coil and plate. The Company is focused on developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing technologically advanced, high-performance alloys, which are used primarily in the aerospace, chemical processing and industrial gas turbine industries. The global specialty alloy market includes stainless steel, titanium alloys, general-purpose nickel alloys and high-performance nickel- and cobalt-based alloys. The Company competes primarily in the high-performance nickel- and cobalt-based alloy sector, which includes high-temperature resistant alloys, or HTA products, and corrosion-resistant alloys, or CRA products. The Company believes it is one of the principal producers of high-performance alloy flat products in sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company also produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars and in bar, billet and wire forms.

36

The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Arcadia, Louisiana; and Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Kokomo facility specializes in flat products, the Arcadia facility specializes in tubular products and the Mountain Home facility specializes in wire and small-diameter bar products. The Company distributes its products primarily through its direct sales organization, which includes 11 service and/or sales centers in the United States, Europe and Asia. All of these centers are Company-operated.

Financial Data Trends

The following table shows certain financial information of the Company for each year in the five-year period ending September 30, 2022.  This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

30


10-K.  Amounts below are in thousands, except backlog, which is in millions, share and per share information and average nickel price.

Year Ended September 30,

 

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

 

Statement of Operations Data:

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

Net revenues

$

435,326

$

490,215

$

380,530

$

337,661

$

490,461

Cost of sales

 

379,491

 

424,712

 

335,898

 

297,931

 

384,128

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

47,030

 

44,195

 

40,307

 

43,470

 

47,089

Research and technical expense

 

3,785

 

3,592

 

3,713

 

3,403

 

3,822

Operating income (loss)

 

5,020

 

17,716

 

612

 

(7,143)

 

55,422

Nonoperating retirement benefit expense

8,238

3,446

6,822

 

1,470

(4,655)

Interest expense (income), net

 

836

 

900

 

1,288

 

1,170

 

2,463

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

17,697

 

3,625

 

(1,020)

 

(1,100)

 

12,527

Net income (loss)

$

(21,751)

$

9,745

$

(6,478)

$

(8,683)

$

45,087

Net income (loss) per share:

Basic

$

(1.75)

$

0.78

$

(0.53)

$

(0.71)

$

3.62

Diluted

$

(1.75)

$

0.78

$

(0.53)

$

(0.71)

$

3.57

Dividends declared per common share

$

0.88

$

0.88

$

0.88

$

0.88

$

0.88

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic

 

12,419,564

 

12,445,212

 

12,470,664

 

12,499,609

 

12,346,025

Diluted

 

12,419,564

 

12,480,908

 

12,470,664

 

12,499,609

 

12,505,500

September 30,

 

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

 

Balance Sheet Data:

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

Working capital

$

304,151

$

311,793

$

313,320

$

287,393

$

383,543

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

179,400

 

169,966

 

159,819

 

147,248

 

142,772

Total assets

 

588,694

 

593,800

 

560,724

 

546,455

 

632,295

Total debt and other finance obligations

 

8,127

 

7,979

 

7,809

 

7,613

 

82,105

Long-term portion of debt and other finance obligations

 

7,980

 

7,809

 

7,614

 

7,385

 

81,839

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits(1)

 

170,180

 

215,741

 

199,223

 

109,722

 

85,222

Stockholders’ equity

 

333,220

 

296,275

 

301,501

 

343,321

 

375,488

Cash dividends paid

 

11,013

 

11,011

 

11,058

 

11,175

 

11,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

Statement of Operations Data:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Net revenues

 

$

482,746

 

$

455,410

 

$

487,635

 

$

406,359

 

$

395,209

 

Cost of sales

 

 

409,120

 

 

408,112

 

 

393,971

 

 

358,779

 

 

365,499

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

38,165

 

 

38,693

 

 

42,572

 

 

39,684

 

 

42,393

 

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,505

 

 

3,556

 

 

3,598

 

 

3,698

 

 

3,855

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

31,956

 

 

5,049

 

 

47,494

 

 

4,198

 

 

(16,538)

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

 

(42)

 

 

(71)

 

 

318

 

 

447

 

 

679

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

 

10,421

 

 

1,369

 

 

16,690

 

 

(1,269)

 

 

(7,027)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

21,577

 

$

3,751

 

$

30,486

 

$

5,020

 

$

(10,190)

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.75

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

$

0.40

 

$

(0.83)

 

Diluted

 

$

1.74

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

$

0.40

 

$

(0.83)

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,223,838

 

 

12,291,881

 

 

12,331,805

 

 

12,361,483

 

 

12,397,099

 

Diluted

 

 

12,265,630

 

 

12,321,700

 

 

12,344,209

 

 

12,366,197

 

 

12,397,099

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

Balance Sheet Data:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Working capital

 

$

347,210

 

$

322,591

 

$

332,015

 

$

310,872

 

$

300,468

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

152,764

 

 

174,083

 

 

185,351

 

 

199,182

 

 

192,556

 

Total assets

 

 

597,582

 

 

610,771

 

 

638,191

 

 

649,601

 

 

621,819

 

Total debt

 

 

767

 

 

745

 

 

4,574

 

 

8,256

 

 

7,896

 

Long-term portion of debt

 

 

767

 

 

745

 

 

4,574

 

 

8,256

 

 

7,896

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits(1)

 

 

167,177

 

 

177,797

 

 

217,837

 

 

255,346

 

 

208,476

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

355,803

 

 

346,730

 

 

341,989

 

 

311,299

 

 

333,772

 

Cash dividends paid

 

 

10,849

 

 

10,906

 

 

10,952

 

 

10,988

 

 

11,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Consolidated Backlog at Fiscal Quarter End(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st quarter

 

$

211.7

 

$

180.2

 

$

215.5

 

$

204.7

 

$

167.3

 

2nd quarter

 

 

207.0

 

 

202.3

 

 

220.4

 

 

193.5

 

 

170.8

 

3rd quarter

 

 

189.6

 

 

204.7

 

 

192.9

 

 

187.2

 

 

180.9

 

4th quarter

 

 

166.6

 

 

221.3

 

 

185.8

 

 

168.3

 

 

177.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

Average nickel price per pound(3)

    

$

6.25

    

$

8.20

    

$

4.49

    

$

4.63

    

$

5.10

 


(1)

(1)

Significant increasesvolatility in the pension and postretirement benefits liability has occurred in fiscal 2015, primarily due to a change to a new mortality table and in fiscal 2016, which was mostly due to reductionsmany factors such as changes in the discount rate used to value the future liability. Conversely, significant decreases occurred in fiscal 2017 primarily due to the increaseliability, variation in the discount rate used to valuereturn on assets and trends of postretirement health care expenses incurred by the future liability.  This hasCompany. These changes have been reflected actuarially as a change toin the Pension and Postretirement Benefits Liability and a corresponding change to the accumulated Other Comprehensive Lossother comprehensive loss account. OnDuring fiscal 2021 as a prospective basis, ifpart of a broader capital allocation strategy, the U.S. pension asset allocation was changed to 30% equity and 70% fixed income as a part of a customized liability driven investment (LDI) strategy designed to secure the improved funding percentage and reduce interest rates were to rise, this would causerate and equity risk.  In addition, a decreaselump sum funding of $15 million occurred in the liabilityfourth quarter of fiscal 2021.  During fiscal 2022, the pension asset allocation was further changed to 14% equity and accumulated other comprehensive loss.

86% fixed income in accordance with the Company’s customized LDI strategy.    

37

Overview of Markets

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

Year Ended September 30,

 

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

 

% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

 

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

 

Net Revenues

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

   

    

(dollars in millions)

Aerospace

$

226.9

 

52.1

%  

$

258.1

 

52.7

%  

$

192.0

 

50.5

%  

$

128.1

 

37.9

%  

$

230.0

 

46.9

%  

Chemical processing

 

79.2

 

18.2

 

89.7

 

18.3

 

63.1

 

16.6

 

63.1

 

18.7

 

91.7

 

18.7

Industrial gas turbine

 

52.4

 

12.0

 

59.4

 

12.1

 

56.6

 

14.9

 

66.8

 

19.8

 

91.9

 

18.7

Other markets

 

53.4

 

12.3

 

57.9

 

11.8

 

45.1

 

11.8

 

58.1

 

17.2

 

53.7

 

11.0

Total product

 

411.9

 

94.6

 

465.1

 

94.9

 

356.8

 

93.8

 

316.1

 

93.6

 

467.3

 

95.3

Other revenue(1)

 

23.4

 

5.4

 

25.1

 

5.1

 

23.7

 

6.2

 

21.6

 

6.4

 

23.2

 

4.7

Net revenues

$

435.3

 

100.0

%  

$

490.2

 

100.0

%  

$

380.5

 

100.0

%  

$

337.7

 

100.0

%  

$

490.5

 

100.0

%  

U.S.

$

258.3

 

59.3

%  

$

300.7

 

61.3

%  

$

230.8

 

60.7

%  

$

179.1

 

53.0

%  

$

278.5

 

56.8

%  

Foreign

$

177.0

 

40.7

%  

$

189.5

 

38.7

%  

$

149.7

 

39.3

%  

$

158.6

 

47.0

%  

$

212.0

 

43.2

%  

Shipments by Market (millions of pounds)

Aerospace

 

9.8

 

53.3

%  

 

10.3

 

51.5

%  

 

7.2

 

49.3

%  

 

5.0

 

35.7

%  

 

8.2

 

46.6

%  

Chemical processing

 

3.9

 

21.2

 

4.3

 

21.5

 

2.8

 

19.2

 

2.8

 

20.0

 

3.5

 

19.9

Industrial gas turbine

 

2.9

 

15.8

 

3.4

 

17.0

 

3.3

 

22.6

 

4.2

 

30.0

 

4.5

 

25.6

Other markets

 

1.8

 

9.8

 

2.0

 

10.0

 

1.3

 

8.9

 

2.0

 

14.3

 

1.4

 

7.9

Total Shipments

 

18.4

 

100.0

%  

 

20.0

 

100.0

%  

 

14.6

 

100.0

%  

 

14.0

 

100.0

%  

 

17.6

 

100.0

%  

Average Selling Price Per Pound

Aerospace

$

23.05

$

25.11

$

26.56

$

25.81

$

27.99

Chemical processing

 

20.54

 

20.80

 

22.21

 

22.40

 

26.44

Industrial gas turbine

 

18.27

 

17.44

 

16.96

 

15.95

 

20.21

Other markets

 

29.14

 

28.35

 

35.85

 

28.46

 

38.12

Total product(2)

 

22.38

 

23.21

 

24.33

 

22.56

 

26.49

Total average selling price

 

23.66

 

24.46

 

25.95

 

24.10

 

27.81

(1)Other revenue consists of toll conversion, royalty income, scrap sales and revenue recognized from the TIMET agreement (see Note 15 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Other revenue does not include associated shipment pounds.
(2)Total product price per pound excludes “Other Revenue”.

Aerospace demand was favorably impacted by the transition to new engine platforms that is driven by a desire for more fuel-efficiency and lower emissions. Fiscal 2018 aerospace volume hit record levels, and revenue in that market increased 17.9% in that year.  Growth continued in fiscal 2019, with further traction of the new generation engine platforms in spite of the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft.  One of the Company’s core focus initiatives was to be compensated for value provided, which contributed to the revenue increase.  Fiscal 2019 sales into the aerospace market represented a new record year in both volume and revenue.  Sales in the first half of fiscal 2020 were reduced with the continued grounding and subsequent production halt of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft.  Sales in the second half of fiscal 2020 were further severely impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic causing significant reductions in air travel, which impacted both new plane builds and aftermarket sales.  Sales into the aerospace market were also negatively affected by high inventory levels of metal in the supply chain, which take time to work through the inventory and slows order volume to the Company.  Volume shipped into the aerospace market declined 30.1% in fiscal 2020 compared to the prior year.  Volumes continued to decline in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 as sales in fiscal year 2021 were 50% of the fiscal year 2019 levels, then began to increase by the end of fiscal 2021.  Growth continued as the number of people flying and announced aircraft build rates have significantly increased.  Single-aisle aircraft build rates announced in the industry show significant growth expectations in both 2022 and 2023 and double-aisle build rate increases are expected to follow one to two years later.  Net sales to the aerospace industry increased over $100 million from fiscal year 2021 to 2022. The

38

Company expects volume levels in fiscal year 2023 to be back to 2019 levels with 2023 revenue exceeding 2019 due to price increases implemented.

Chemical processing revenue grew double digits from fiscal year 2018 to 2019.  The main driver of demand in this market is capital spending in the chemical processing sector, driven by end-user demand for housing, automotive, energy and agricultural products. The chemical processing market is sensitive to oil prices, currency fluctuations and fiscal policies as well as world economic conditions and GDP growth. Additional drivers of demand in this market include the increase in North American production of natural gas liquids and the further downstream processing of chemicals that may utilize equipment that requires high-performance alloys. Increased sales to the chemical processing industry in fiscal 2018 and 2019 were related to improvement in global spending in the chemical processing sector combined with the Company’s focus initiatives aimed at improving volumes.  Fiscal 2020 and 2021 volume and sales were significantly impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Volume shipped into the chemical processing industry market declined 34.9% in fiscal 2020 compared to the prior year and generally remained at that level across fiscal year 2021. Fiscal year 2022 volumes increased 23.0% combined with a higher value mix driving a 45.2% revenue increase.  Higher oil prices are fueling additional capital expenditures in the chemical industry.

Industrial gas turbines are beneficial in electricity generating facilities due to low capital cost at installation, fewer emissions than traditional fossil fuel-fired facilities and relative favorable natural gas prices in the U.S. provided by availability of non-conventional (shale) gas supplies.  Sales to the industrial gas turbine market declined in years leading up to fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2018 volumes represented less than half the volume of fiscal 2012 peak levels.  Reported significant overcapacity in large-frame turbines primarily used for electrical power generation combined with growth in renewable energy facilities had taken a toll on demand for large-frame gas turbines.  Sales and volume began to recover in fiscal 2019 and the first half of fiscal 2020.  The recovery included a market share gain for the Company which began to gain traction in fiscal 2020.  The global COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected this market, however sales declines were mitigated by the Company’s market share gains as well as restocking beginning to occur in the supply chain.  Sales declined only 4.7% in fiscal 2020 compared to the prior year, then increased 18.0% in fiscal 2021 and 37.6% in fiscal 2022 as the market share gain showed its full impact.  The Company’s strategy includes efforts to further increase market share going forward.

Other markets represent certain traditional businesses of oil and gas, flue-gas desulfurization, automotive and heat treating as well as new emerging technologies such as ultra-supercritical CO2, next-generation nuclear, fuel cells and other alternative energy applications.  The industries in the other markets category focus on upgrading overall product quality, improving product performance through increased efficiency, prolonging product life and lowering long-term costs. Companies in these industries are looking to achieve these goals through the use of “advanced materials” which support the increased use of high-performance alloys in an expanding number of applications. Sales into the other markets category improved in both fiscal 2018 and 2019.  Sales in fiscal 2020 were significantly impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic.  Sales in fiscal year 2021 increased 28.8% as the Company strategically sought increased mill volumes especially in the flue-gas desulphurization (FGD) industry to help improve fixed costs absorption challenges in the overall low volume environment in early fiscal year 2021.  In fiscal year 2022, as overall volumes improved, the Company reallocated capacity to higher value markets such as aerospace and de-emphasized certain low-value commodity grade alloys such as those going into the FGD industry. The Company continues to evaluate new opportunities and applications for its products, particularly in the areas of renewable clean energy sources and other developing technologies relating to environmental and climate change issues.

Other revenue consists primarily of toll conversion, but also includes royalty income, scrap sales and revenue recognized from the TIMET agreement. The demand for toll conversion includes TIMET conversion demand completed on the Company’s four-high Steckel hot rolling mill in Kokomo, Indiana, as well as conversion work completed through LaPorte Custom Metal Products.  Other revenue demand levels vary year-to-year based upon demand drivers in the respective markets of the Company’s tolling customers.  The global COVID-19 pandemic impacted tolling revenue, particularly revenue from those tolling customers that sell into the aerospace market.  In fiscal 2022, other revenue represented 4.7% of net sales.  Other revenue does not include associated shipment pounds because the metal is not owned by the Company.

39

Valuation of the Pension Plan and the Retiree Healthcare Plan

The actuarial valuation of the U.S. pension and retiree healthcare plans on September 30, 2022 included a favorable increase in the discount rates used to measure the plan liabilities along with continued favorable retiree health care spending.  The U.S. defined benefit pension net liabilities decreased $5.5 million from $26.1 million at the beginning of the year to $20.7 million at September 30, 2022.  The funding percentage of plan assets compared to benefit obligation was 90.8% as of September 30, 2022.  This funding percentage has held relatively steady even through significant market turmoil as the Company had previously implemented a glide path which includes a customized liability driven investment strategy designed to secure this funding percentage.  In addition, the post-retirement health care liability, which is unfunded, declined $19.0 million during fiscal 2022 from $83.0 million at September 30, 2021 to $64.0 million at September 30, 2022 driven by the higher discount rates. These amounts do not include the United Kingdom pension plan which is a $7.7 million net asset (shown in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet) or two small nonqualified pension plans with a liability of $0.5 million.  

Volumes and Pricing

Prior to the pandemic, the Company shipped 20.0 million pounds in fiscal 2019.  Subsequent to fiscal 2019, in the first half of fiscal 2020, volumes were negatively impacted by the grounding and subsequent production halt of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. The second half of fiscal 2020 was then significantly additionally impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic, which dramatically lowered volumes for fiscal 2020 to 14.6 million pounds and fiscal 2021 to 14.0 million pounds. During fiscal year 2022 volumes progressively improved for a total of 17.6 million pounds with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022 at 4.9 million pounds, a run rate near the pre-pandemic levels.        

Solid increases in volume and average selling price per pound were achieved in all three major markets in fiscal 2022. Fiscal 2022 aerospace volume increased 65.5% along with an 8.4% increase in aerospace average selling price resulting in a 79.6% or $101.9 million aerospace revenue increase compared to the prior year.  This increase is primarily driven by the single-aisle aircraft recovery with the double-aisle aircraft recovery expected to be delayed over fiscal 2023 and 2024. Volumes in the chemical processing industry (CPI) increased 23.0% along with an 18.0% increase in the CPI average selling price resulting in a 45.2% or $28.5 million CPI revenue increase compared to the prior year.  Industrial gas turbine (IGT) volumes were up 8.6% along with a 26.7% increase in the IGT average selling price resulting in a 37.6% or $25.1 million IGT revenue increase compared to the prior year.    

The product average selling price per pound in fiscal 2022 was $26.49, which is a 17.4% increase over last fiscal year.  This increase is driven by higher raw material costs as well as price increases, partially offset by a lower-value product mix.  

Gross Profit Margin Trend Performance

The following tables show net revenue, gross profit margin and gross profit margin percentage for fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022.

Trend of Gross Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2021

Quarter Ended

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

$

72,177

$

82,063

$

88,143

$

95,278

Gross Profit Margin

 

987

8,385

13,658

16,700

Gross Profit Margin %

 

1.4%

 

10.2%

 

15.5%

 

17.5%

40

Trend of Gross Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2022

Quarter Ended

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

$

99,430

$

117,056

$

130,165

$

143,810

Gross Profit Margin

 

17,777

23,413

33,222

31,921

Gross Profit Margin %

 

17.9%

 

20.0%

 

25.5%

 

22.2%

A significant strategic effort to improve gross margins has occurred over the past few years.  This effort was beginning to gain traction with gross margins as a percent of revenue hitting approximately 18% in the months preceding the pandemic.  The significant drop in volumes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic compressed margins significantly through fiscal 2021, especially in the first half of the fiscal year.  These low volume levels created a significant fixed cost absorption headwind which required a direct charge to cost of goods sold for excess fixed overhead per pound incurred due to abnormally low production levels that could not be capitalized into inventory.  In fiscal 2021, the direct charges each quarter were $5.9 million, $2.8 million, $2.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively. As volumes began the recovery, no direct charges were necessary in fiscal 2022 and margins strengthened across fiscal 2022 compared to the prior year.

As a result of this strategy, the Company reduced the volume breakeven point by over 25%. The Company previously struggled to be profitable at roughly 5.0 million pounds. Now, with the current product mix, the Company can generate profits at lower volumes as first demonstrated in the third quarter of fiscal 2021, producing a positive net income at only 3.7 million pounds shipped. As volume continued to rise during 2022, incremental profitability leverage helped improve gross margins significantly. Rising raw material costs, which resulted in increased revenue from certain customer contracts with raw material cost adjustments also contributed to the improving gross margin percentages, although excluding this estimated impact, gross margins remained above 21% in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2022.

The improving gross margin as a percentage of sales along with rising sales levels, provides a compounding effect on the gross margin dollars generated in fiscal 2022 compared to the prior year with gross margin dollars increasing $66.6 million or an improvement of 167.6%.    

Controllable Working Capital

Controllable working capital, which includes accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses, was $378.3 million at September 30, 2022, an increase of $139.6 million or 58.5% from $238.7 million at September 30, 2021.  The increase resulted primarily from inventory increasing by $109.1 million and accounts receivable increasing by $37.0 million during fiscal 2022, partially offset by accounts payable and accrued expenses increasing by $6.4 million during the same period.  Approximately 60% of the increase in inventory was attributable to a higher cost of inventory, primarily due to higher commodity prices, with the remaining increase due to a higher quantity of inventory.   The Company continued to build work-in-process inventory during fiscal 2022 in response to the rapidly growing backlog.

Dividends Declared

On November 17, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The dividend is payable December 19, 2022 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 5, 2022. The aggregate cash payout based on current shares outstanding will be approximately $2.7 million, or approximately $11.0 million on an annualized basis if current dividend levels are maintained.

41

Backlog

Set forth below is information relating to the Company’s backlog and the 30-day average nickel price per pound as reported by the London Metals Exchange.

    

2018

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Consolidated Backlog at Fiscal Quarter End(1):

1st quarter

$

205.7

$

237.8

$

237.6

$

145.1

$

217.5

2nd quarter

 

212.3

 

253.0

 

204.7

 

140.9

 

280.7

3rd quarter

 

220.6

 

254.9

 

174.6

 

150.9

 

338.2

4th quarter

 

216.0

 

235.2

 

153.3

 

175.3

 

373.7

Year Ended September 30,

 

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

 

Average nickel price per pound(2)

    

$

5.68

    

$

8.02

    

$

6.74

    

$

8.80

    

$

10.28

(2)(1)

The Company defines backlog to include firm commitments from customers for delivery of product at established prices. There are orders in the backlog at any given time which include prices that are subject to adjustment based on changes in raw material costs, which can vary from approximately 30%-50%but is roughly 50% of the orders.  Historically,

31


approximately 75%70% of the backlog orders have shipped within six months and approximately 90% have shipped within 12 months. The backlog figures do not typically reflect that portion of the business conducted at service and sales centers on a spot or “just‑in‑time”“just-in-time” basis.

(2)

(3)

Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Please refer to page 2 of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K for a cautionary statement regarding forward‑looking information.

Overview of Business

The Company is one of the world’s largest producers of high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt‑based alloys in flat product form, such as sheet, coil and plate. The Company is focused on developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing technologically advanced, high‑performance alloys, which are used primarily in the aerospace, chemical processing and industrial gas turbine industries. The global specialty alloy market consists of three primary sectors: stainless steel, general-purpose nickel alloys and high‑performance nickel- and cobalt‑based alloys. The Company competes primarily in the high‑performance nickel- and cobalt‑based alloy sector, which includes high‑temperature resistant alloys, or HTA products, and corrosion‑resistant alloys, or CRA products. The Company believes it is one of the principal producers of high‑performance alloy flat products in sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company also produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars and in bar, billet and wire forms.

The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Arcadia, Louisiana; and Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Kokomo facility specializes in flat products, the Arcadia facility specializes in tubular products and the Mountain Home facility specializes in wire products. The Company distributes its products primarily through its direct sales organization, which includes 13 service and/or sales centers in the United States, Europe and Asia. All of these centers are Company‑operated.

Quarter Ended

Quarter Ended

 

December 31, 

March 31, 

June 30, 

September 30, 

December 31, 

March 31, 

June 30,

September 30,

 

  

2020

  

2021

  

2021

  

2021

  

2021

  

2022

  

2022

  

2022

 

Backlog

    

    

Dollars (in thousands)

$

145,143

$

140,892

$

150,915

$

175,299

$

217,477

$

280,687

$

338,178

$

373,736

Pounds (in thousands)

 

5,607

 

5,622

 

6,642

 

7,084

 

8,931

 

10,654

 

12,125

 

12,798

Average selling price per pound

$

25.89

$

25.06

$

22.72

$

24.75

$

24.35

$

26.35

$

27.89

$

29.20

Average nickel price per pound

London Metals Exchange(1)

$

7.62

$

7.47

$

8.14

$

8.80

$

9.10

$

15.47

$

11.71

$

10.28

32


Overview of Markets

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Net Revenues

   

 

    

   

    

   

 

    

   

    

   

 

    

   

    

   

 

    

   

    

   

 

    

   

    

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

197.1

 

40.8

%  

$

195.2

 

42.9

%  

$

215.1

 

44.1

%  

$

197.4

 

48.6

%  

$

192.5

 

48.7

%  

Chemical processing

 

 

124.1

 

25.7

 

 

113.4

 

24.9

 

 

111.6

 

22.9

 

 

72.3

 

17.8

 

 

70.5

 

17.8

 

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

102.0

 

21.2

 

 

86.7

 

19.0

 

 

74.4

 

15.3

 

 

68.1

 

16.8

 

 

61.5

 

15.6

 

Other markets

 

 

48.9

 

10.1

 

 

44.4

 

9.8

 

 

59.8

 

12.2

 

 

45.0

 

11.0

 

 

43.2

 

10.9

 

Total product

 

 

472.1

 

97.8

 

 

439.7

 

 96.6

 

 

460.9

 

94.5

 

 

382.8

 

94.2

 

 

367.7

 

93.0

 

Other revenue(1)

 

 

10.6

 

2.2

 

 

15.7

 

3.4

 

 

26.7

 

5.5

 

 

23.6

 

5.8

 

 

27.5

 

7.0

 

Net revenues

 

$

482.7

 

100.0

%  

$

455.4

 

100.0

%  

$

487.6

 

100.0

%  

$

406.4

 

100.0

%  

$

395.2

 

100.0

%  

U.S.

 

$

268.0

 

55.5

%  

$

261.6

 

57.4

%  

$

287.7

 

59.0

%  

$

233.6

 

57.5

%  

$

235.5

 

59.6

%  

Foreign

 

$

214.7

 

44.5

%  

$

193.8

 

42.6

%  

$

199.9

 

41.0

%  

$

172.8

 

42.5

%  

$

159.7

 

40.4

%  

Shipments by Market (millions of pounds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

8.1

 

38.5

%  

 

8.8

 

40.7

%  

 

9.2

 

45.3

%  

 

8.7

 

48.3

%  

 

8.8

 

48.6

%  

Chemical processing

 

 

5.2

 

24.8

 

 

5.2

 

24.2

 

 

4.3

 

21.2

 

 

2.8

 

15.6

 

 

3.2

 

17.7

 

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

6.1

 

29.1

 

 

5.9

 

27.2

 

 

4.7

 

23.2

 

 

5.0

 

27.8

 

 

4.5

 

24.9

 

Other markets

 

 

1.6

 

7.6

 

 

1.7

 

7.9

 

 

2.1

 

10.3

 

 

1.5

 

8.3

 

 

1.6

 

8.8

 

Total Shipments

 

 

21.0

 

100.0

%  

 

21.7

 

100.0

%  

 

20.3

 

100.0

%  

 

18.0

 

100.0

%  

 

18.1

 

100.0

%  

Average Selling Price Per Pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

24.31

 

 

 

$

22.10

 

 

 

$

23.27

 

 

 

$

22.64

 

 

 

$

21.76

 

 

 

Chemical processing

 

 

23.79

 

 

 

 

21.63

 

 

 

 

25.97

 

 

 

 

25.68

 

 

 

 

22.28

 

 

 

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

16.66

 

 

 

 

14.74

 

 

 

 

15.99

 

 

 

 

13.71

 

 

 

 

13.77

 

 

 

Other markets

 

 

30.69

 

 

 

 

26.11

 

 

 

 

28.98

 

 

 

 

30.74

 

 

 

 

26.36

 

 

 

Total product(2)

 

 

22.44

 

 

 

 

20.30

 

 

 

 

22.75

 

 

 

 

21.31

 

 

 

 

20.30

 

 

 

Total average selling price

 

 

22.94

 

 

 

 

21.02

 

 

 

 

24.07

 

 

 

 

22.62

 

 

 

 

21.81

 

 

 


(1)

(1)

Other revenue consists of toll conversion, royalty income, scrap sales and revenue recognized from the TIMET agreement (see Note 15 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Other revenue does not include associated shipment pounds.

(2)

Total product price per pound excludes “Other Revenue”.

Aerospace demand in fiscal 2013 was at a low level as a result of the negative impact of customer destocking within the supply chain. This period of low demand began to recover in the latter half of fiscal 2014, and the recovery continued through fiscal 2015, which proved to be a record year in volume for the Company in aerospace shipments.  Aerospace demand moderated slightly in fiscal 2016 due to delays in the transition to new engine platforms combined with some softness in demand driven by lower oil and fuel costs.  As these issues normalized, pounds shipped increased slightly in fiscal 2017 although at a lower average selling price, resulting in a decline in aerospace revenues in fiscal 2017.   Underpinning demand for new engines is a desire for more fuel-efficiency and lower emissions, which has been tempered with recent decreased fuel prices. The Company considers the slight pull back in demand temporary because both Boeing and Airbus have reported sizeable backlog increases along with forecasted increases in production schedules and continued emphasis on accelerating production. Management also anticipates that the maintenance, repair and overhaul business will continue at a steady to increasing pace due to required maintenance schedules for the rising number of engines in use year‑over‑year.

Chemical processing industry demand declined each year from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2015 and took a sizable step down in fiscal 2016.  Sales into this market in fiscal 2015 and the second half of fiscal 2016 included some high-value special application projects with high average selling prices per pound, but overall base-volumes in this market were low in both fiscal 2015 and 2016 compared to prior years. Fiscal 2017 volume shipments increased but at a lower average price per pound, resulting in lower chemical processing revenue in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016.  Demand for large-volume orders has been at relatively low levels during the past several years. The main driver of demand in this market is

33


capital spending in the chemical processing sector driven by end‑user demand for housing, automotive, energy and agricultural products. The chemical processing market is sensitive to oil prices, currency fluctuations and fiscal policies as well as world economic conditions and GDP growth. Potential for increased sales to the chemical processing industry in fiscal 2018 will be dependent on improvement in global spending in the chemical processing sector. Another potential driver of demand in this market is the increase in North American production of natural gas liquids and the further downstream processing of those chemicals that may utilize equipment that requires high‑performance alloys.

Sales to the industrial gas turbine market peaked in fiscal 2012 and decreased over fiscal years 2013 to 2017.  However, fiscal 2012 and 2013 were two of the Company’s best years for industrial gas turbine sales volume.  The collapse of oil prices in 2014 had an adverse impact on small frame industrial gas turbines used as pipeline transportation systems for the oil industry.  As oil prices have moderately recovered, management expects demand to improve.  Subject to global economic conditions, management believes that long‑term demand in this market will increase due to higher activity in power generation and alternative power systems. Industrial gas turbines are favored in electric generating facilities due to low capital cost at installation, fewer emissions than traditional fossil fuel‑fired facilities and favorable natural gas prices provided by availability of non-conventional (shale) gas supplies. As governmental policy shifts away from coal‑fired facilities, demand for industrial gas turbines is expected to increase.

Volume shipped into the other markets category increased from fiscal 2013 to 2015, then moderated in fiscal 2016 and improved slightly in fiscal 2017.  Sales to this market in fiscal 2015 included some high-value special application projects with high average selling prices per pound.  The industries in this category focus on upgrading overall product quality, improving product performance through increased efficiency, prolonging product life and lowering long‑term costs. Companies in these industries are looking to achieve these goals through the use of “advanced materials” which support the increased use of high‑performance alloys in an expanding number of applications. In addition to supporting and expanding the traditional businesses of oil and gas, flue‑gas desulfurization in China, automotive and heat treating, the Company expects increased levels of activity overall in non‑traditional markets such as fuel cells and alternative energy applications in the long term.

Summary of Capital Spending

Over the past three years, the Company was capacity constrained at times in sheet production as it experienced higher demand for thin-gauge flat products from customers, driven by strong growth in the aerospace market.  In response to this heightened demand and the anticipation of future demand growth, the Company made investments of $22 million to increase capacity in the heat treating and cold rolling areas.  Entering fiscal 2018, the Company has completed this capacity expansion and is now positioned to increase manufacturing output to service anticipated growth in the aerospace market.  As utilization ramps up on this new capacity, the Company expects the associated volume increases will have immediate contributions to profitability. 

In May 2016, the Company announced the relocation of its Lebanon, Indiana service center operations to LaPorte, Indiana.  With this move, the Company is increasing its service center capacity and capabilities with new building improvements and equipment in the amount of approximately $9.8 million, of which approximately $8.7 million has been spent to date. 

Capital spending was $31.6 million and $15.0 million in fiscal 2016 and 2017, respectively, and the forecast for capital spending in fiscal 2018 is approximately $17.0 million.  Cumulative capital spending over the past five fiscal years has exceeded $170.0 million, which has increased manufacturing capacity in secondary melting, flat products rolling, annealing, value-added cutting, tubular production as well the implementation of a global information technology system.  These investments should enable the Company to keep pace with anticipated growth in the aerospace market.  The $17.0 million of planned capital spending in fiscal 2018 includes the completion of cold-finishing capacity expansion and completion of the LaPorte service center operations expansion, as well as the ongoing maintenance of existing manufacturing capacity.

Volumes, Competition and Pricing

Volumes dropped 11.3% in fiscal 2016 to 18.0 million pounds, then increased slightly to 18.1 million pounds in fiscal 2017.  Business conditions became increasingly challenging over fiscal 2016 and 2017 with falling nickel prices and continued headwinds related to foreign currency and lower oil and gas demand creating a spillover impact on the

34


Company’s chemical processing and industrial gas turbine businesses.  The second half of fiscal 2017 was unfavorably impacted by lower levels of specialty application projects.

Product average selling price per pound declined by $(1.01) or 4.7% in fiscal 2017 as compared to 2016.  A lower value product mix and pricing competition drove a decline of approximately $(1.78) per pound.  This decline was partially offset by an increase in raw material prices of approximately $0.77 per pound, with nickel prices accounting for approximately $0.19 per pound of the increase and cobalt prices accounting for approximately $0.52 per pound of the increase.  While the market price of cobalt has increased dramatically, cobalt usage in the Company’s overall shipments is estimated at below 10%.  Nickel usage in the Company products is more impactful at approximately 50%.  The average market price of nickel as reported by the London Metals Exchange in fiscal 2014 was $7.51 per pound, which declined 20.9% to $5.94 per pound for fiscal 2015, declined 30.3% further to $4.14 per pound in fiscal 2016, then increased moderately to $4.70 in fiscal 2017.  The London Metals Exchange price for the 30-days ending September 30, 2017 was $5.10 per pound.  The Company values inventory utilizing the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) inventory costing methodology. In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first out method.  Conversely, in a period of rising prices, the FIFO inventory valuation normally results in lower costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first out method.  

Gross Profit Margin Trend Performance

The following tables show net revenue, gross profit margin and gross profit margin percentage for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trend of Gross Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2016

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 

$

95,070

 

$

102,511

 

$

101,255

 

$

107,523

Gross Profit Margin

 

 

12,088

 

 

8,905

 

 

13,265

 

 

13,322

Gross Profit Margin %

 

 

12.7%

 

 

8.7%

 

 

13.1%

 

 

12.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trend of Gross Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2017

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 

$

93,355

 

$

103,112

 

$

97,977

 

$

100,765

Gross Profit Margin

 

 

10,487

 

 

9,788

 

 

3,662

 

 

5,773

Gross Profit Margin %

 

 

11.2%

 

 

9.5%

 

 

3.7%

 

 

5.7%

Gross margin dollars in the second half of fiscal 2016 improved due to higher levels of specialty application projects.  During the first half of fiscal 2017, gross margin dollars declined due to lower levels of specialty application projects as compared to fiscal 2016.  Gross margin dollars in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 continued to trend lower due, primarily, to a lower level of specialty application projects and an increase to the Company’s lower-of-cost-or-market and slow-moving reserve, resulting in a gross margin percentage of only 3.7%.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, gross margin improved due to higher overall volumes, lack of adjustments to inventory reserves and a more profitable product mix. 

Working Capital

Controllable working capital, which includes accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses, was $259.1 million at September 30, 2017, an increase of $3.8 million or 1.5% from $255.4 million at September 30, 2016. This increase of $3.8 million includes an increase in inventory of $7.9 million, partially offset by decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $4.1 million.

35


Dividends Declared

On November 16, 2017, the Company announced that the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The dividend is payable December 15, 2017 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 2017. The aggregate cash payout based on current shares outstanding will be approximately $2.7 million, or approximately $11.0 million on an annualized basis.

Backlog

Set forth below is information relating to the Company’s backlog and the 30‑day average nickel price per pound as reported by the London Metals Exchange. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the remainder of  “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

  

2015

  

2016

  

2016

  

2016

  

2016

  

2017

  

2017

  

2017

 

Backlog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

Dollars (in thousands)

 

$

204,713

 

$

193,538

 

$

187,215

 

$

168,340

 

$

167,286

 

$

170,848

 

$

180,922

 

$

177,300

 

Pounds (in thousands)

 

 

6,445

 

 

6,248

 

 

6,281

 

 

6,098

 

 

6,795

 

 

6,960

 

 

7,496

 

 

6,453

 

Average selling price per pound

 

$

31.76

 

$

30.98

 

$

29.81

 

$

27.61

 

$

24.62

 

$

24.55

 

$

24.14

 

$

27.48

 

Average nickel price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

London Metals Exchange(1)

 

$

3.94

 

$

3.95

 

$

4.04

 

$

4.63

 

$

5.00

 

$

4.64

 

$

4.05

 

$

5.10

 


(1)

Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

Backlog was $177.3 million at September 30, 2017, a decrease of approximately $3.6 million, or 2.0%, from $180.9 million at June 30, 2017. The backlog dollars decreasedincreased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20172022 due to a 13.9% decrease5.6% increase in backlog pounds partially offset bycombined with a 13.8%4.7% increase in backlog average selling price.  The primary driver for the reduction in backlog was lower order entry which is typical during the summer months.  The increase in average selling price isincrease was due to a higher-value product mix in the backlog.     mix.

During fiscal 2017, theThe backlog increased by $9.0 million, or 5.3%,increase from $168.3 million at September 30, 20162021 to $177.3 million at September 30, 20172022 was due to a 5.8%an 80.7% increase in backlog pounds partially offset by a 0.5% decreasecombined with an 18.0% increase in backlog average selling price.  The increase in backlog pounds was primarily driven by increases in demand across all markets, especially aerospace.  The increase in average selling price was due to a higher-value product mix in the aerospace market.   

backlog, along with higher raw material prices and higher prices for value provided.

3642


Revenues by geographic area

Net revenues in fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022 were generated primarily by the Company’s U.S. operations. Sales to domestic customers comprised approximately 61%, 53% and 57% of the Company’s net revenues in fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. In addition, the majority of the Company’s operating costs are incurred in the U.S., as all of its manufacturing facilities are located in the U.S. It is expected that net revenues will continue to be highly dependent on the Company’s domestic sales and manufacturing facilities in the U.S.

The Company’s foreign and export sales were approximately $149.8 million, $158.6 million and $212.0 million for fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Additional information concerning foreign operations and export sales is set forth in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Quarterly Market Information

Quarter Ended

Quarter Ended

December 31, 

March 31, 

June 30, 

September 30, 

December 31, 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

September 30, 

2020

2021

2021

2021

2021

2022

 

2022

2022

Net revenues (in thousands)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

Aerospace

$

24,555

$

30,601

$

33,950

$

38,966

$

48,455

$

52,918

$

60,981

$

67,647

Chemical processing

 

15,256

 

15,068

 

17,010

 

15,813

 

17,450

22,850

24,180

27,185

Industrial gas turbine

 

13,967

 

16,436

 

17,835

 

18,534

 

14,598

24,788

23,991

28,501

Other markets

 

12,779

 

15,546

 

13,709

 

16,056

 

14,487

9,755

14,518

14,946

Total product revenue

 

66,557

 

77,651

 

82,504

 

89,369

 

94,990

 

110,311

 

123,670

 

138,279

Other revenue

 

5,620

 

4,412

 

5,639

 

5,909

 

4,440

6,745

6,495

5,531

Net revenues

$

72,177

$

82,063

$

88,143

$

95,278

$

99,430

$

117,056

$

130,165

$

143,810

Shipments by markets (in thousands of pounds)

Aerospace

 

904

 

1,177

 

1,354

 

1,528

 

1,864

 

1,808

 

2,142

 

2,402

Chemical processing

 

601

 

682

 

814

 

722

 

794

 

870

 

882

 

921

Industrial gas turbine

 

798

 

1,064

 

1,147

 

1,178

 

799

 

1,416

 

1,090

 

1,242

Other markets

 

489

 

599

 

415

 

538

 

420

 

244

 

427

 

318

Total shipments

 

2,792

 

3,522

 

3,730

 

3,966

 

3,877

 

4,338

 

4,541

 

4,883

Average selling price per pound

Aerospace

$

27.16

$

26.00

$

25.07

$

25.50

$

26.00

$

29.27

$

28.47

$

28.16

Chemical processing

 

25.38

 

22.09

 

20.90

 

21.90

 

21.98

26.26

27.41

29.52

Industrial gas turbine

 

17.50

 

15.45

 

15.55

 

15.73

 

18.27

17.51

22.01

22.95

Other markets

 

26.13

 

25.95

 

33.03

 

29.84

 

34.49

39.98

34.00

47.00

Total average selling price (product only; excluding other revenue)

 

23.84

 

22.05

 

22.12

 

22.53

 

24.50

25.43

27.23

28.32

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 

25.85

 

23.30

 

23.63

 

24.02

 

25.65

26.98

28.66

29.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

 

2015

 

2016

 

2016

 

2016

 

2016

 

2017

 

2017

 

2017

Net revenues (in thousands)

 

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Aerospace

 

$

47,535

 

$

52,342

 

$

47,039

 

$

50,529

 

$

45,784

 

$

49,536

 

$

46,895

 

$

50,300

Chemical processing

 

 

16,200

 

 

13,108

 

 

20,469

 

 

22,539

 

 

19,128

 

 

18,081

 

 

15,017

 

 

18,241

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

16,997

 

 

18,960

 

 

16,117

 

 

15,989

 

 

14,593

 

 

17,827

 

 

14,731

 

 

14,372

Other markets

 

 

9,474

 

 

12,304

 

 

10,789

 

 

12,466

 

 

8,429

 

 

9,923

 

 

14,379

 

 

10,472

Total product revenue

 

 

90,206

 

 

96,714

 

 

94,414

 

 

101,523

 

 

87,934

 

 

95,367

 

 

91,022

 

 

93,385

Other revenue

 

 

4,864

 

 

5,797

 

 

6,841

 

 

6,000

 

 

5,421

 

 

7,745

 

 

6,955

 

 

7,380

Net revenues

 

$

95,070

 

$

102,511

 

$

101,255

 

$

107,523

 

$

93,355

 

$

103,112

 

$

97,977

 

$

100,765

Shipments by markets (in thousands of pounds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

2,064

 

 

2,314

 

 

2,042

 

 

2,300

 

 

2,017

 

 

2,322

 

 

2,207

 

 

2,301

Chemical processing

 

 

714

 

 

649

 

 

745

 

 

708

 

 

605

 

 

771

 

 

858

 

 

929

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

1,300

 

 

1,365

 

 

1,227

 

 

1,073

 

 

1,039

 

 

1,403

 

 

1,011

 

 

1,015

Other markets

 

 

308

 

 

431

 

 

365

 

 

361

 

 

316

 

 

350

 

 

501

 

 

472

Total shipments

 

 

4,386

 

 

4,759

 

 

4,379

 

 

4,442

 

 

3,977

 

 

4,846

 

 

4,577

 

 

4,717

Average selling price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

23.03

 

$

22.62

 

$

23.04

 

$

21.97

 

$

22.70

 

$

21.33

 

$

21.25

 

$

21.86

Chemical processing

 

 

22.69

 

 

20.20

 

 

27.48

 

 

31.83

 

 

31.62

 

 

23.45

 

 

17.50

 

 

19.64

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

13.07

 

 

13.89

 

 

13.14

 

 

14.90

 

 

14.05

 

 

12.71

 

 

14.57

 

 

14.16

Other markets

 

 

30.76

 

 

28.55

 

 

29.56

 

 

34.53

 

 

26.67

 

 

28.35

 

 

28.70

 

 

22.19

Total average selling price (product only; excluding other revenue)

 

 

20.57

 

 

20.32

 

 

21.56

 

 

22.86

 

 

22.11

 

 

19.68

 

 

19.89

 

 

19.80

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 

 

21.68

 

 

21.54

 

 

23.12

 

 

24.21

 

 

23.47

 

 

21.28

 

 

21.41

 

 

21.36

Results of Operations

This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2022 and 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021. For discussion related to 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020 that are not included in this Form 10-K, please refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2021 Form 10-K, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 2021.

43

Year Ended September 30, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 20162021

($ in thousands, except per share figures)

Year Ended September 30, 

Change

 

2021

    

2022

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues

    

$

337,661

    

100.0

%  

$

490,461

    

100.0

%  

$

152,800

    

45.3

%

Cost of sales

 

297,931

 

88.2

%  

 

384,128

 

78.3

%  

 

86,197

 

28.9

%

Gross profit

 

39,730

 

11.8

%  

 

106,333

 

21.7

%  

 

66,603

 

167.6

%

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

43,470

 

12.9

%  

 

47,089

 

9.6

%  

 

3,619

 

8.3

%

Research and technical expense

 

3,403

 

1.0

%  

 

3,822

 

0.8

%  

 

419

 

12.3

%

Operating income (loss)

 

(7,143)

 

(2.1)

%  

 

55,422

 

11.3

%  

 

62,565

 

(875.9)

%

Nonoperating retirement benefit expense (income)

1,470

0.4

%  

 

(4,655)

 

(0.9)

%  

 

(6,125)

 

(416.7)

%

Interest income

 

(16)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(18)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(2)

 

12.5

%

Interest expense

 

1,186

 

0.4

%  

 

2,481

 

0.5

%  

 

1,295

 

109.2

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

(9,783)

 

(2.9)

%  

 

57,614

 

11.7

%  

 

67,397

 

(688.9)

%

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

(1,100)

 

(0.3)

%  

 

12,527

 

2.6

%  

 

13,627

 

(1,238.8)

%

Net income (loss)

$

(8,683)

 

(2.6)

%  

$

45,087

 

9.2

%  

$

53,770

 

(619.3)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 

 

Change

 

 

 

2016

    

2017

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues

    

$

406,359

    

100.0

%  

$

395,209

    

100.0

%  

$

(11,150)

    

(2.7)

%

Cost of sales

 

 

358,779

 

88.3

%  

 

365,499

 

92.5

%  

 

6,720

 

1.9

%

Gross profit

 

 

47,580

 

11.7

%  

 

29,710

 

7.5

%  

 

(17,870)

 

(37.6)

%

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

39,684

 

9.8

%  

 

42,393

 

10.7

%  

 

2,709

 

6.8

%

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,698

 

0.9

%  

 

3,855

 

1.0

%  

 

157

 

4.2

%

Operating income (loss)

 

 

4,198

 

1.0

%  

 

(16,538)

 

(4.2)

%  

 

(20,736)

 

(493.9)

%

Interest income

 

 

(108)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(186)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(78)

 

72.2

%

Interest expense

 

 

555

 

0.1

%  

 

865

 

0.2

%  

 

310

 

55.9

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

3,751

 

0.9

%  

 

(17,217)

 

(4.4)

%  

 

(20,968)

 

(559.0)

%

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

 

(1,269)

 

(0.3)

%  

 

(7,027)

 

(1.8)

%  

 

(5,758)

 

453.7

%

Net income (loss)

 

$

5,020

 

1.2

%  

$

(10,190)

 

(2.6)

%  

$

(15,210)

 

(303.0)

%

37


The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

By market

Year Ended

 

September 30, 

Change

 

    

2021

    

2022

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues (dollars in thousands)

Aerospace

$

128,072

$

230,001

$

101,929

 

79.6

%

Chemical processing

 

63,147

 

91,665

 

28,518

 

45.2

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

66,772

 

91,878

 

25,106

 

37.6

%

Other markets

 

58,090

 

53,706

 

(4,384)

 

(7.5)

%

Total product revenue

 

316,081

 

467,250

 

151,169

 

47.8

%

Other revenue

 

21,580

 

23,211

 

1,631

 

7.6

%

Net revenues

$

337,661

$

490,461

$

152,800

 

45.3

%

Pounds by market (in thousands)

Aerospace

 

4,963

 

8,216

 

3,253

 

65.5

%

Chemical processing

 

2,819

 

3,467

 

648

 

23.0

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

4,187

 

4,547

 

360

 

8.6

%

Other markets

 

2,041

 

1,409

 

(632)

 

(31.0)

%

Total shipments

 

14,010

 

17,639

 

3,629

 

25.9

%

Average selling price per pound

Aerospace

$

25.81

$

27.99

$

2.18

 

8.4

%

Chemical processing

 

22.40

 

26.44

 

4.04

 

18.0

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

15.95

 

20.21

 

4.26

 

26.7

%

Other markets

 

28.46

 

38.12

 

9.66

 

33.9

%

Total product (excluding other revenue)

 

22.56

 

26.49

 

3.93

 

17.4

%

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

$

24.10

$

27.81

$

3.71

 

15.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

197,445

 

$

192,515

 

$

(4,930)

 

(2.5)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

72,316

 

 

70,467

 

 

(1,849)

 

(2.6)

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

68,063

 

 

61,523

 

 

(6,540)

 

(9.6)

%

Other markets

 

 

45,033

 

 

43,203

 

 

(1,830)

 

(4.1)

%

Total product revenue

 

 

382,857

 

 

367,708

 

 

(15,149)

 

(4.0)

%

Other revenue

 

 

23,502

 

 

27,501

 

 

3,999

 

17.0

%

Net revenues

 

$

406,359

 

$

395,209

 

$

(11,150)

 

(2.7)

%

Pounds by market (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

8,720

 

 

8,847

 

 

127

 

1.5

%

Chemical processing

 

 

2,816

 

 

3,163

 

 

347

 

12.3

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

4,965

 

 

4,468

 

 

(497)

 

(10.0)

%

Other markets

 

 

1,465

 

 

1,639

 

 

174

 

11.9

%

Total shipments

 

 

17,966

 

 

18,117

 

 

151

 

0.8

%

Average selling price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

22.64

 

$

21.76

 

$

(0.88)

 

(3.9)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

25.68

 

 

22.28

 

 

(3.40)

 

(13.2)

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

13.71

 

 

13.77

 

 

0.06

 

0.4

%

Other markets

 

 

30.74

 

 

26.36

 

 

(4.38)

 

(14.2)

%

Total product (excluding other revenue)

 

 

21.31

 

 

20.30

 

 

(1.01)

 

(4.7)

%

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 

$

22.62

 

$

21.81

 

$

(0.81)

 

(3.6)

%

44

Net Revenues.  Net revenues were $395.2$490.5 million in fiscal 2017, a decrease2022, an increase of 2.7%45.3% from $406.4$337.7 million in fiscal 2016,2021 due to a decreaseincreases in volume in key markets and average selling price per pound partially offset by anincreases in all markets.  The 25.9% increase in volume.pounds sold is due to the demand recovery and strong sales in the aerospace market as well as the chemical processing and industrial gas turbine markets as compared to fiscal 2021.  The product average product selling price was $20.30$26.49 in fiscal 2022, an increase of 17.4% from $22.56 per pound in fiscal 2017, a decrease of 4.7%, or $(1.01), from $21.31 per pound2021.  The increase in fiscal 2016. Volume was 18.1 million pounds in fiscal 2017, an increase of 0.8% from 18.0 million pounds in fiscal 2016 with increases in the aerospace, chemical processing and other markets. The average product selling price per pound decreased as a result of pricing competition and lower levels of specialty application projects, which decreased average selling price per pound by approximately $1.35 and a lower-value product mix, which decreased average selling price per pound by approximately $0.43, partially offset by higher raw material market prices, which increased average selling price by approximately $0.77 per pound.

Sales to the aerospace market were $192.5 million in fiscal 2017, a decrease of 2.5% from $197.4 million in fiscal 2016, due to a 3.9%, or $0.88, decrease in the average selling price per pound, partially offset by a 1.5% increase in volume.  The increase in volume2022 largely reflects solid aerospace demand especially in the new generation engines.  The average selling price per pound decrease reflects an increase in pricing competition and a change to a lower-value product mix, which decreased average selling price per pound by approximately $1.03 and $0.63, respectively, partially offset by a change inhigher market prices of raw materials, which increased average selling price per pound by approximately $0.78.  

Sales to the chemical processing market were $70.5 million in fiscal 2017, a decrease of 2.6% from $72.3 million in fiscal 2016, due to a 13.2%, or $3.40, decrease in the average selling$2.31, and price per pound, partially offset by a 12.3% increase in volume. Volumes increased in fiscal 2017 from very low levels, but the increase may suggest the beginning of a recovery in base business.  The decrease in the average selling price per pound reflects a change to a lower-value product mixincreases and increased pricing competition, which decreased average selling price per pound by approximately $2.69 and $1.16, respectively, partially offset by higher raw material market prices,other sales factors, which increased average selling price per pound by approximately $0.45

38


Sales to the industrial gas turbine market were $61.5 million in fiscal 2017, a decrease of 9.6% from $68.1 million in fiscal 2016, due to a 10.0% decrease in volume$1.70, partially offset by a 0.4%, or $0.06, increase in thelower-value product mix, which decreased average selling price per pound.  pound by $0.08.

The decreaseaerospace market has experienced increased demand as inventory throughout the aerospace supply chain continues to be replenished in volumeresponse to the expected increase in engine build rates. Additionally, demand in fiscal 2021 was due primarilydepressed by the COVID-19 pandemic that decreased demand for air travel resulting in decreased demand for new planes and maintenance parts.  The increase in average selling price per pound largely reflects higher market prices of raw materials, which increased average selling price per pound by approximately $2.26, and price increases and other sales factors, which increased average selling price per pound by approximately $1.58, partially offset by a lower-value product mix, which decreased average selling price per pound by $1.66.  

Volume to a decreased level of transactional businessthe chemical processing market was higher as industrial activity increased with economies continuing to reopen from pandemic shutdowns as well as increases in this market, along with a lower level of ingot orders shipped.oil prices resulting in expanded capital expenditures in the sector.  The increase in average selling price per pound reflects a change to a higher-value product mix and higher raw material market prices of raw materials, which increased average selling price per pound by approximately $1.04$2.28, and $0.84, respectively, partially offset by increased pricing competition, which decreased average selling price per pound by approximately $1.82. 

Sales toincreases and other markets were $43.2 million in fiscal 2017, a decrease of 4.1% from $45.0 million in fiscal 2016, due to a 14.2% decrease in average selling price per pound, partially offset by an 11.9% increase in volume. The increase in volume is due primarily to small increases in volume in the flue-gas desulfurization and oil and gas markets, along with small improvements in transactional orders in other markets.  The decrease in the average selling price reflects a change in product mix to lower‑value forms and alloys and increased pricing competition, which decreased average selling price per pound by approximately $3.31 and $2.23, respectively, partially offset by an increase in raw material market prices,sales factors, which increased average selling price per pound by approximately $1.15.

Other Revenue.  Other revenue was $27.5 million in fiscal 2017, an increase of 17.0% from $23.5 million in fiscal 2016. The increase in other revenue is primarily attributable to increased conversion services and miscellaneous revenue combined with adjustments to sales reserves.

Cost of Sales.  Cost of sales was $365.5 million, or 92.5% of net revenues, in fiscal 2017 compared to $358.8 million, or 88.3% of net revenues, in fiscal 2016. Cost of sales in fiscal 2017 increased by $6.7 million as compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to higher volume, higher raw material costs and increased pension expense,$2.00, partially offset by a lower-value product mix, sold.which decreased average selling price per pound by $0.24.

Gross Profit.  As

The higher volume to the industrial gas turbine market was a result of overall increased demand in the above factors, gross margin was $29.7 million for fiscal 2017, a decrease of $17.9 million from $47.6 million in fiscal 2016 driven by less favorable product mix as a result of less specialty application projects.  Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 7.5% in fiscal 2017 as compared to 11.7% in fiscal 2016.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense.  Selling, general and administrative expense was $42.4 million for fiscal 2017, an increase of $2.7 million, or 6.8%, from $39.7 million in fiscal 2016.market.  The increase in expense was primarily driven by fluctuations in foreign currencies of $2.1 million.  Higher pension expense and higher bad debt expense also contributed to the increased expense.  Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 10.7% for fiscal 2017, compared to 9.8% for fiscal 2016.

Research and Technical Expense.  Research and technical expense was $3.9 million, or 1.0% of revenue, for fiscal 2017, compared to $3.7 million, or 0.9% of net revenue, in fiscal 2016.

Operating Income/(Loss).  As a result of the above factors, operating loss in fiscal 2017 was $(16.5) million, compared to operating income of $4.2 million in fiscal 2016.

Income Taxes.  A benefit from income taxes of $7.0 million was incurred in fiscal 2017, a difference of $5.8 million from a tax benefit of $1.3 million in fiscal 2016. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2017 was 40.8%, compared to 33.8% in fiscal 2016.  The higher tax rate in fiscal 2017 was attributed to a higher proportion of net loss recorded in the higher-rate United States jurisdiction in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016.    

Net Income/(Loss).  As a result of the above factors, net loss for fiscal 2017 was $(10.2) million, a decrease of $15.2 million from net income of $5.0 million in fiscal 2016.

39


Year Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2015

($ in thousands, except per share figures)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 

 

Change

 

 

 

2015

    

2016

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues

    

$

487,635

    

100.0

%  

$

406,359

    

100.0

%  

$

(81,276)

    

(16.7)

%

Cost of sales

 

 

393,971

 

80.8

%  

 

358,779

 

88.3

%  

 

(35,192)

 

(8.9)

%

Gross profit

 

 

93,664

 

19.2

%  

 

47,580

 

11.7

%  

 

(46,084)

 

(49.2)

%

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

42,572

 

8.7

%  

 

39,684

 

9.8

%  

 

(2,888)

 

(6.8)

%

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,598

 

0.7

%  

 

3,698

 

0.9

%  

 

100

 

2.8

%

Operating income (loss)

 

 

47,494

 

9.7

%  

 

4,198

 

1.0

%  

 

(43,296)

 

(91.2)

%

Interest income

 

 

(94)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(108)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(14)

 

14.9

%

Interest expense

 

 

412

 

0.1

%  

 

555

 

0.1

%  

 

143

 

34.7

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

47,176

 

9.7

%  

 

3,751

 

0.9

%  

 

(43,425)

 

(92.0)

%

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

 

16,690

 

3.4

%  

 

(1,269)

 

(0.3)

%  

 

(17,959)

 

(107.6)

%

Net income (loss)

 

$

30,486

 

6.3

%  

$

5,020

 

1.2

%  

$

(25,466)

 

(83.5)

%

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.45

 

 

 

$

0.40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

$

2.45

 

 

 

$

0.40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,331,805

 

 

 

 

12,361,483

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

 

12,344,209

 

 

 

 

12,366,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

By market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

215,062

 

$

197,445

 

$

(17,617)

 

(8.2)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

111,599

 

 

72,316

 

 

(39,283)

 

(35.2)

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

74,456

 

 

68,063

 

 

(6,393)

 

(8.6)

%

Other markets

 

 

59,794

 

 

45,033

 

 

(14,761)

 

(24.7)

%

Total product revenue

 

 

460,911

 

 

382,857

 

 

(78,054)

 

(16.9)

%

Other revenue

 

 

26,724

 

 

23,502

 

 

(3,222)

 

(12.1)

%

Net revenues

 

$

487,635

 

$

406,359

 

$

(81,276)

 

(16.7)

%

Pounds by market (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

9,243

 

 

8,720

 

 

(523)

 

(5.7)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

4,298

 

 

2,816

 

 

(1,482)

 

(34.5)

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

4,657

 

 

4,965

 

 

308

 

6.6

%

Other markets

 

 

2,063

 

 

1,465

 

 

(598)

 

(29.0)

%

Total shipments

 

 

20,261

 

 

17,966

 

 

(2,295)

 

(11.3)

%

Average selling price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

23.27

 

$

22.64

 

$

(0.63)

 

(2.7)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

25.97

 

 

25.68

 

 

(0.29)

 

(1.1)

%

Industrial gas turbine

 

 

15.99

 

 

13.71

 

 

(2.28)

 

(14.3)

%

Other markets

 

 

28.98

 

 

30.74

 

 

1.76

 

6.1

%

Total product (excluding other revenue)

 

 

22.75

 

 

21.31

 

 

(1.44)

 

(6.3)

%

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 

$

24.07

 

$

22.62

 

$

(1.45)

 

(6.0)

%

40


Net Revenues.  Net revenues were $406.4 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 16.7% from $487.6 million in fiscal 2015, due to a decrease in average selling price per pound combined with a decrease in volume. The average product selling price was $21.31 per pound in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 6.3%, or $1.44, from $22.75 per pound in fiscal 2015. Volume was 18.0 million pounds in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 11.3% from 20.3 million pounds in fiscal 2015 with reductions in the aerospace, chemical processing and other markets. Average product selling price decreased due to a combination of the following factors: lower raw materialreflects higher market prices which decreased average selling price by approximately $1.29 per pound, and increased pricing competition, which decrease average selling price by approximately $0.50 per pound, partially offset by a change to a higher-value product mix,of raw materials, which increased average product selling price by approximately $0.35 per pound.

Sales to the aerospace market were $197.4 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 8.2% from $215.1 million in fiscal 2015, due to a 5.7% decrease in volume combined with a 2.7%, or $0.63, decrease in the average selling price per pound. The decrease in volume reflects supply chain adjustments as the transition to new generation engines progresses.  The average selling price per pound decreased primarily due to lower raw material market prices,by approximately $2.27, price increases and other sales factors, which represented approximately $1.32 of a decrease per pound, combined with increased pricing competition, which represented a decrease of approximately $0.60 per pound, partially offset by a higher-value product mix, which represented an increase of approximately $1.30 per pound. 

Sales to the chemical processing market were $72.3 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 35.2% from $111.6 million in fiscal 2015, due to a 34.5% decrease in volume, combined with a 1.1%, or $0.29, decrease in the average selling price per pound. Volumes decreased due to a lower level of base business, reflecting the impact of low oil prices on the chemical processing marketpound by approximately $1.65 and a lower level of project orders shipped, especially in the first half, compared to fiscal 2015.  The decrease in the average selling price reflects lower raw material market prices, which represented a decrease of approximately $1.27 per pound, partially offset by a higher-value product mix, which increased average selling price by approximately $0.46 per pound along with increased pricing, in the amount of approximately $0.52 per pound.by $0.34.

Sales to the industrial gas turbine market were $68.1 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 8.6% from $74.5 million in fiscal 2015, due to a 14.3%

The decrease in volume to other markets was primarily attributable to lower shipments into the flue-gas desulphurization market which also contributed to an improved product mix.  The average selling price per pound partially offset by an increase reflects higher market prices of 6.6% in volume.  The increase in volume is due primarily to anraw materials, which increased level of ingot and plate orders shipped in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015.  The decrease in average selling price per pound reflectsby approximately $2.83 as well as a change to a lower-valuehigher-value product mix and other pricing factors, which represented a decrease of approximately $0.32 per pound, increased pricing competition, which represented approximately $0.69 per pound of the decrease, combined with lower raw material market prices, which represented approximately $1.27 per pound of the decrease.

Sales to other markets were $45.0 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 24.7% from $59.8 million in fiscal 2015, due to a 29.0% decrease in volume, partially offset by a 6.1%, or $1.76, increase in average selling price per pound.pound by approximately $6.83.  

Other Revenue.  The 7.6% increase in other revenue was primarily due to increased sales of scrap material.  

Cost of Sales.  The decrease in volume is due to lower levelscost of specialty application project orders shipped in fiscal 2016.  The increase in the average selling price reflectssales as a change in product mix to higher‑value forms and alloys, which represented an increasepercentage of approximately $4.25 per pound, partially offset by price competition, which decreased average selling price by approximately $1.21 per pound, combined with lower raw material market prices, which decrease average selling price by approximately $1.28 per pound.

Other Revenue.  Other revenuerevenues was $23.5 million in fiscal 2016, a decrease of 12.1% from $26.7 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease in other revenue is primarily attributable to decreased conversion services and miscellaneous revenue combined with adjustmentsvariable cost saving measures that enable the Company mitigate the increase in costs in periods of higher net revenues.  Additionally, higher volumes sold during fiscal 2022 eliminated the need for fixed costs to sales reserves.

Cost of Sales.  Cost of salesbe directly expensed, as was $358.8 million, or 88.3% of net revenues,the case in fiscal 2016 compared2021, when $11.5 million of costs were directly expensed to $394.0 million, or 80.8%cost of net revenues, in fiscal 2015. Cost of sales in fiscal 2016 decreased by $35.2 million as compared to fiscal 2015 primarily due to lower volume, partially offset by a higher-value product mix sold.sales.  

Gross Profit.  As a result of the above factors, gross marginprofit was $47.6 million for fiscal 2016, a decrease of $46.1 million from $93.7$106.3 million in fiscal 2015.2022, an increase of $66.6 million from fiscal 2021. Gross marginprofit as a percentage of net revenue decreasedincreased to 11.7%21.7% in fiscal 20162022 as compared to 19.2%11.8% in fiscal 2015.  The decrease is primarily attributable2021 which continued to a less-profitable mix of products sold in fiscal 2016 related tobe impacted by the lower sales of specialty application projects and falling nickel prices.   Falling nickel prices created compression on gross margins due to pressure on selling prices from lower nickel prices, combined with higher cost of sales as the Company sold the higher-cost inventory melted in a prior period with higher nickel prices.COVID-19 pandemic.  

41


Selling, General and Administrative Expense.  Selling,  The decrease in selling, general and administrative expense was $39.7 million for fiscal 2016, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 6.8%, from $42.6 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease in expense was primarily driven by lower management incentive compensation expense in fiscal 2016.  Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues was largely driven by a 45.3% increase in net revenues.  Higher foreign exchange losses as well as general inflation were the primary drivers of the increased expense during fiscal 2022.  Additionally, some temporary cost containment initiatives that were in place during the first quarter of fiscal 2021, in response to 9.8% forthe COVID-19 pandemic, were subsequently ended, which contributed to higher expense in fiscal 2016,2022 as compared to 8.7% for fiscal 2015.2021.

45

Nonoperating retirement benefit expense.  The $6.1 million difference in nonoperating retirement benefit expense (income) was primarily driven by a favorable actuarial valuation of the U.S. pension plan liability as of September 30, 2021 caused by a higher-than-expected return on plan assets coupled with a higher discount rate.  The amortization of this favorable valuation is recorded as a benefit to nonoperating retirement benefit expense (income).  

Research and Technical Expense.  Research and technical

Income Taxes.  The $13.6 million difference in income tax expense was $3.7 million, or 0.9% of revenue, for fiscal 2016, compared to $3.6 million, or 0.7% of net revenue,driven primarily by a difference in fiscal 2015.

Operating Income.  As a result of the above factors, operating income in fiscal 2016 was $4.2 million, compared to operating income of $47.5 million in fiscal 2015.

Income Taxes.  A benefit from(loss) before income taxes of $1.3 million was incurred in fiscal 2016 compared to expense of $16.7 million in fiscal 2015, resulting in a difference of $18.0$67.4 million.  The tax benefit realized in fiscal 2016 is primarily attributable to an increase in deferred tax assets as a result of an increase in the Company’s blended state tax rate.  The increased state tax rate had an approximately $1.8 million benefit to income taxes.  Additionally, the Company recognized a research and development tax credit that had a $0.8 million tax benefit partially offset by an unfavorable tax adjustment of $0.3 million as a result of a federal tax law that was enacted during the year.  

Net Income.  As a result of the above factors, net income in fiscal 2016 was $5.0 million, a decrease of $25.5 million from net income of $30.5 million in fiscal 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Comparative cash flow analysis (2016(2021 to 2017)2022)

During fiscal 2017, the Company’s primary sources of cash were cash on‑hand and cash from operations, as detailed below. At September 30, 2017, theThe Company had cash and cash equivalents of $46.3$8.4 million compared to $59.3 million (excluding restricted cash of $5.4 million) at September 30, 2016. As2022, inclusive of September 30, 2017, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $13.4$7.4 million that was held by foreign subsidiaries in various currencies. currencies, compared to $47.7 million at September 30, 2021.  Additionally, the Company had $74.7 million of borrowings against the line of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2022.

Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2022 was $79.5 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities was $13.1of $23.3 million during fiscal 2021, a difference of $102.7 million.  Cash used in operating activities in fiscal 20172022 was driven by an increase in inventory of $116.8 million as compared to $54.0 millionrelatively flat inventory during fiscal 2021, and an increase in fiscal 2016. The lower cash provided in fiscal 2017 was largely driven by net losses of $10.2 million in fiscal 2017 compared to net income of $5.0 million in fiscal 2016 as well as changes in working capital, in particular, cash used from higher inventories of $7.0 million in fiscal 2017 compared to cash generated from lower inventories of $6.6 million in fiscal 2016 and cash generated from lower accounts receivable of $0.8$42.7 million induring fiscal 20172022 as compared to cash generated from loweran increase in accounts receivable of $11.0$6.2 million induring fiscal 2016.  Additionally, cash paid for income taxes was $2.3 million in fiscal 2017 compared to cash refunded of $6.5 million in fiscal 2016.2021. This was partially offset by cash provided from increases in accounts payable and accrued expensesnet income of $3.5$45.1 million in fiscal 20172022 as compared to cash used from decreases in accounts payable innet loss of $(8.7) million during fiscal 2016.      2021.  

Net cash used in investing activities was $15.1 million in fiscal 2017 of $15.0 million2022, which was lowerhigher than cash used in investing activities inof $5.9 million during fiscal 2016 of $31.6 million by $16.6 million as a result of lower additions2021 due to property, plant and equipment, as the Company’s capacity expansion in sheet manufacturing was completed.  

Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2017 of $11.4 million included $11.0 million of dividend payments and approximately $0.3 million of stock re-purchases made to satisfy taxes in relation to the vesting of restricted stock, which is comparable to the prior year.

Comparative cash flow analysis (2015 to 2016)

During fiscal 2016, the Company’s primary sources of cash were cash on‑hand and cash from operations, as detailed below. At September 30, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $59.3 million (excluding restricted cash of $5.4 million) compared to cash and cash equivalents of $49.0 million at September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $13.7 million that was held by foreign subsidiaries in various currencies. 

42


Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.0 million in fiscal 2016 compared to $48.4 million in fiscal 2015. The higher cash provided in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 was largely driven by changes in working capital, in particular, cash provided from accounts receivable of $11.0 million in fiscal 2016 compared to cash used from lower accounts receivable of $5.0 million in fiscal 2015.  Additionally, cash used from lower accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.8 million in fiscal 2016 was less than cash used from lower accounts payable and accrued expenses of $8.7 million in fiscal 2015, and cash provided from lower inventory of $6.6 million in fiscal 2016 was higher than cash provided from lower inventory of $4.1 million in fiscal 2015.  Other significant contributors to the higher cash provided by operating activities were income tax refunds of $6.5 million in fiscal 2016 compared to tax payments of $14.0 million in fiscal 2015 as well as the receipt of advance payments from customers (recorded as deferred revenue), which amounted to a favorable $5.0 million change.  Partially offsetting the above mentioned cash flow drivers was lower net income of $5.0 million in fiscal 2016 compared to $30.5 million fiscal 2015.    

Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2016 of $31.6 million was lower than cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2015 of $33.1 million by $1.5 million as a result of the acquisition of the Leveltek – LaPorte assets in the amount of $14.6 million that occurred in fiscal 2015, partially offset by higher additions to property, plant and equipmentequipment.  Capital spending in fiscal 2022 approached a more normal level of $13.1investment; however, below the rate of depreciation, after lower than historical levels of investment in fiscal 2021.  

Net cash provided by financing activities was $56.6 million in fiscal 2016.

Net2022, a difference of $74.0 million from cash used in financing activities of $17.4 million during fiscal 2021.  This difference was primarily driven by a net borrowing of $74.7 million against the revolving line of credit during fiscal 2022, partially offset by share repurchases of $7.2 million in fiscal 20162022 as compared to $5.0 million during fiscal 2021.  Dividends paid of $11.5$11.1 million included $11.0during fiscal 2022 were $0.1 million lower than dividends paid of dividend payments and approximately $0.3$11.2 million of stock re-purchases madeduring fiscal 2021 due to satisfy taxes in relation tofewer shares outstanding following the vesting of restricted stock, which is comparable to the prior year.Company’s share repurchases.  

Future sources of liquidity

The Company’s sources of liquidity for fiscal 2018the next twelve months are expected to consist primarily of cash generated from operations, cash on‑handon-hand and if needed, borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility.facility, the terms of which are described in Note 8 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements provided pursuant to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company had cash of $46.3$8.4 million, an outstanding balance of zero$74.7 million on the U.S. revolving credit facility andwith access to a total of approximately $120.0an additional $25.3 million, under the U.S. revolving credit facility, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves.  On October 7, 2022, the maximum availability under the U.S. revolving credit facility was increased from $100.0 million to $160.0 million to provide the Company with additional liquidity.  Management believes that the resources described above will be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures, any regular quarterly dividends declared and working capital requirements over the next twelve months.

U.S. revolving credit facility

The Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”) entered into a Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with certain other lenders with an effective date of July 14, 2011. On July 7, 2016, the Company amended the agreement to, among other things, extend the term through July 7, 2021 and reduce unused line fees and certain administrative fees. The maximum revolving loan amount under the Amended Agreement is $120.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves. The Amended Agreement permits an increase in the maximum revolving loan amount from $120.0 million up to an aggregate amount of $170.0 million at the request of the borrower. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either Wells Fargo’s “prime rate”, plus up to 0.75% per annum, or the adjusted Eurodollar rate used by the lender, plus up to 2.0% per annum.  As of September 30, 2017, the U.S. revolving credit facility had a zero balance.

The Company must pay monthly, in arrears, a commitment fee of 0.20% per annum on the unused amount of the U.S. revolving credit facility total commitment. For letters of credit, the Company must pay 1.5% per annum on the daily outstanding balance of all issued letters of credit, plus customary fees for issuance, amendments and processing.

The Company is subject to certain covenants as to fixed charge coverage ratios and other customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of indebtedness, the granting of liens and the sale of assets. The covenant pertaining to fixed charge coverage ratios is only effective in the event the amount of excess availability under the revolver is less than 10.0% of the maximum credit revolving loan amount. The Company is permitted to pay dividends and repurchase common stock if certain financial metrics are met (most of which do not apply in the case of regular quarterly dividends less than $20.0 million in the aggregate in a year and repurchases in connection with the vesting of shares of restricted stock). As of September 30, 2017, the most recent required measurement date under the Amended Agreement, management believes the Company was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants under the Amended

43


Agreement. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the U.S. assets of the Company, including the equity interests in its U.S. subsidiaries, but excluding the four-high Steckel rolling mill and related assets, which are pledged to Titanium Metals Corporation (“TIMET”) to secure the performance of the Company’s obligations under a Conversion Services Agreement with TIMET (see discussion of TIMET at Note 15 in the Company’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The U.S. revolving credit facility is also secured by a pledge of a 65% equity interest in each of the Company’s direct foreign subsidiaries.

Future uses of liquidity

The Company’s primary uses of cash over the next twelve months are expected to consist of expenditures related to:

·

Funding operations, including raw material purchases, labor costs, insurance, utilities, equipment maintenance;

Funding operations;

Capital spending, including for purchases of new plant and equipment;

46

·

Capital spending;

·

Dividends to stockholders; and

·

Pension and postretirement plan contributions.

contributions, including an anticipated contribution to the U.S. pension plan of $6 million during fiscal 2023.

Capital investment in fiscal 20172022 was $15.0$15.1 million, and the plan for capital spending in fiscal 20182023 is $17.0planned to be between $20.0 million and $24.0 million. See “Summary of Capital Spending” in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K for additional discussion of actual and planned capital spending.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth the Company’s contractual obligations for the periods indicated, as of September 30, 2017:2022.  Management believes cash from operations, cash on hand and borrowings under the U.S. Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet these obligations as they come due.

Payments Due by Period

 

Less than

More than

 

Contractual Obligations

Total

1 year

1-3 Years

3-5 Years

5 years

 

(in thousands)

 

Credit facility(1)

    

$

81,282

    

$

4,254

    

$

77,028

    

$

    

$

Operating lease obligations(2)

 

3,387

 

2,126

 

1,071

 

190

 

Finance lease obligations(3)

 

13,594

 

1,024

 

2,069

 

2,093

 

8,408

Raw material contracts(4)

 

40,230

 

40,230

 

 

 

Capital projects and other commitments

 

5,442

 

4,799

 

643

 

 

Pension plan(5)

 

20,655

 

6,000

 

12,000

 

2,655

 

Non-qualified pension plans

 

530

 

95

 

190

 

190

 

55

Other postretirement benefits(6)

 

64,037

 

3,276

 

9,113

 

8,046

 

43,602

Environmental post-closure monitoring

 

407

 

66

 

156

 

143

 

42

Total

$

229,564

$

61,870

$

102,270

$

13,317

$

52,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

1 year

 

1-3 Years

 

3-5 Years

 

5 years

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Credit facility fees(1)

    

$

1,070

    

$

280

    

$

560

    

$

230

    

$

 —

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

6,412

 

 

2,978

 

 

3,102

 

 

332

 

 

 —

 

Capital and finance lease obligations

 

 

18,711

 

 

1,015

 

 

2,004

 

 

2,013

 

 

13,679

 

Raw material contracts (primarily nickel)

 

 

23,006

 

 

23,006

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Capital projects and other commitments

 

 

10,780

 

 

10,780

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Pension plan(2)

 

 

90,276

 

 

6,000

 

 

16,900

 

 

28,100

 

 

39,276

 

Non-qualified pension plans

 

 

777

 

 

95

 

 

190

 

 

190

 

 

302

 

Other postretirement benefits(3)

 

 

50,000

 

 

5,000

 

 

10,000

 

 

10,000

 

 

25,000

 

Environmental post-closure monitoring

 

 

633

 

 

104

 

 

112

 

 

121

 

 

296

 

Total

 

$

201,665

 

$

49,258

 

$

32,868

 

$

40,986

 

$

78,553

 


(1)

(1)

As of September 30, 2017,2022, the revolver balance was zero, therefore no interest is due. However, the Company is obligated to the Bank for$74,721 which expires on April 19, 2024 (See Note 8. Debt).  Additionally, future unused line fees and quarterly management fees.

interest expense are estimated assuming current borrowings on the revolving credit facility and no extension of terms beyond the current maturity date.  

(2)

(2)

Represents multi-year obligation for all operating leases for certain land and buildings, plant equipment, vehicles, office and computer equipment, including short term lease obligations.   Typically, lease obligations on real estate are renewed upon expiration and lease obligations on equipment are replaced with new leases unless the Company makes a decision to purchase new equipment.
(3)

Represents payments for finance lease obligations of real property that are intended to be held for a long time.
(4)

Raw material purchase obligations consist primarily of commitments to purchase commodities, primarily nickel, cobalt, chromium or molybdenum as well as scrap alloys.  We believe the minimum required purchase quantities are lower than our current requirements for these metals.  Additionally, changes in the market price of these commodities along with changes in the Company’s production volumes will determine if future requirements beyond these commitments will differ from the current levels.

(5)The Company has a funding obligation to contribute $90,276$20,655 to the domestic pension plan. These payments will be tax deductible. All benefit payments under the domestic pension plan will come from the plan and not the Company.

(6)

(3)

Represents expected other postretirement benefits based upon anticipated timing of payments.

4447


Inflation or Deflation

While neitherThe Company may be favorably or unfavorably impacted by inflation noror deflation, has had, nor does the Company expect them to have,resulting in a material impact on its operating results, there can be no assurance that the Company’s business will not be affected by inflation or deflation in the future. Historically, theresults.  The Company has had the abilityattempts to pass on toonto customers both increases in consumable costs and material costs because of the value‑addedvalue-added contribution the material makes to the final product. Raw material comprises the most significant portion of the product, costs. Nickel, cobalt and molybdenum, the primary raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s products, all have experienced significant fluctuations in price. In the future,however, the Company may not be able to successfully offset a rapid increasesincrease in the price of nickel or other raw materials.material costs adjustments to customer selling prices.  In the event of raw material price declines, the Company’s customers may delay order placement, resulting in lower volumes. In the event thatof raw material price increases that the Company is unable to pass on to its customers, occur, the Company’s cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Overview

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on‑goingongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts,credit losses, inventories, income taxes, asset impairments, retirement benefits, matters related to product liability and other lawsuits and environmental matters. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, pension asset mix and, in some cases, actuarial techniques and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of this process form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The Company routinely reevaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company’s accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K. The Company has identified certain critical accounting policies, which are described below. The following listing of policies is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company’s accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when collectability is reasonably assured and when title passes to the customer which is generally at the time of shipment (F.O.B. shipping point or at a foreign port for certain export customers). Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a component of net revenues in the periods in which the related sales are recognized. Management determines this allowance based on historical experience. Should returns increase above historical experience, additional allowances may be required. Additionally, the Company recognizes revenue attributable to an up‑front fee received from Titanium Metals Corporation (“TIMET”) as a result of a twenty‑year agreement, entered into on November, 17, 2006 to provide conversion services to TIMET. See Note 15 Deferred Revenue for a description of accounting treatment relating to this up‑front fee.

45


Pension and Postretirement Benefits

The Company has defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering most of its current and former employees. Significant elements in determining the assets or liabilities and related income or expense for these plans are the expected return on plan assets (if any), the discount rate used to value future payment streams, expected trends in health care costs and other actuarial assumptions. Annually, the Company evaluates the significant assumptions to be used to value its pension and postretirement plan assets and liabilities based on current market conditions and expectations of future costs. If actual results are less favorable than those projected by management, additional expense may be required in future periods.

The selection of the U.S. pension plan’s (the Plan) assumption for the expected long‑termlong-term rate of return on plan assets is based upon the Plan’s target allocation of 60% equities and 40% bonds, and the expected rate of return for each equity/bond asset class. Based upon the target allocation and each asset class’s expected return, the Plan’s return on assets assumption of 7.25% is reasonable, and is reduced from last year’s assumption of 7.50%.allocation.  The return on assets is based on fair value of the plan assets and their investment allocation at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company also realizes that historical performance is no guarantee of future performance.

48

In the short term, substantial decreases in plan assets will result in higher plan funding contribution levels and higher pension expenses. A decrease of 25 basis points in the expected long‑termlong-term rate of return on plan assets would result in an increase in annual pension expense of about $501,000.$0.5 million. To the extent that the actual return on plan assets during the year exceeds or falls short of the assumed long‑termlong-term rate of return, an asset gain or loss is created. For funding purposes, gains and losses are generally amortized over a 7‑year6-year period. As an example, each $1.0 million in asset loss created by unfavorable investment performance results in seven annual payments (contributions) of approximately $170,000 depending upon the precise effective interest rate in the valuation and the timing of the contribution.

Decreases in discount rates used to value future payment streams will result in higher liabilities for pension and postretirement plans. A decrease of 25 basis points would result in $9.6$5.8 million higher liability for the U.S. pension plan and $5.2$2.2 million higher liability for the postretirement plan. This increase in liability would also increase the accumulated other comprehensive loss that would be amortized as higher pension and postretirement expense over an amortization period of approximately 7.06.0 and 7.910.7 years, respectively.

Salaried employees hired after December 31, 2005 and hourly employees hired after June 30, 2007 are not covered by the pension plan; however, they are eligible for an enhanced matching program of the defined contribution plan (401(k)). Effective December 31, 2007, the U.S. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for all non‑unionnon-union employees in the U.S. Effective September 30, 2009, the U.K. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for employees in the plan.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company offered a lump sum or annuity pension distribution option to terminated vested participants of the U.S. pension plan.  This option was accepted by 146 participants who received distributions totaling $8,688.  The individuals who accepted the lump sum option were no longer participants in the pension plan as of September 30, 2016.

Impairment of Long‑lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets

The Company reviews long‑lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long‑lived assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company reviews assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired on trademark and patent intangible assets.

46


Income Taxes

The Company accounts for deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence.

In its evaluationthe process of completing an assessment of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudentwe make judgements and estimates with respect to future operating results, feasible tax planning strategies. strategies, timing of the reversal of deferred tax assets and current market and industry factors.  In order to determine the effective tax rate to apply to interim periods, estimates and judgements are made (by taxable jurisdiction) as to the amount of taxable income that may be generated, the availability of deductions and credits expected and the availability of net operating loss carryforwards or other tax attributes to offset taxable income.  

The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income.  A change in our effective tax rate by 1% would have had an impact of approximately $0.6 million to Net income (loss) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022.  

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding New Accounting Standards.

49

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market RiskRisk

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. The Company is exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and the price of raw materials, particularly nickel.nickel and cobalt, as well as the costs of supplies.

Changes in interest rates affect the Company’s interest expense on variable rate debt. All of the Company’s revolver availability iswas at a variable rate at September 30, 20162021 and 2017.2022. The Company’s outstanding variable rate debt was zero at September 30, 20162021 and 2017.$74.7 million at September 30, 2022.  The Company has not entered into any derivative instruments to hedge the effects of changes in interest rates.

The foreign currency exchange risk exists primarily because the Company’s foreign subsidiaries maintain receivables and payables denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. TheForeign currency forward contracts are entered into as a means to partially offset the impact of cash transactions occurring at the foreign subsidiaries manage their own foreign currency exchange risk.affiliates in currencies other than the entities’ functional currency.  The U.S. operations transact their foreign sales in U.S. dollars, thereby avoiding fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Any exposure aggregating more than $500,000 requires approval from the Company’s Vice President of Finance. The Company is not currently party to any currency contracts.contracts as of September 30, 2022.

Fluctuations in the price of nickel the Company’s most significant raw material,and cobalt, subject the Company to commodity price risk. The Company manages its exposure to this market risk through internally established policies and procedures, including negotiating raw material escalators within product sales agreements and continually monitoring and revising customer quote amounts to reflect the fluctuations in market prices for nickel. The Company does not presently use derivative instruments to manage this market risk but may in the future. The Company monitors its underlying market risk exposure from a rapid change in nickel prices on an ongoing basis and believes that it can modify or adapt its strategies as necessary. The Company periodically purchases raw material forward with certain suppliers. However, there is a risk that the Company may not be able to successfully offset a rapid increase or decrease in the cost of raw material in the future.

4750


Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary DataData

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Haynes International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 20172021 and 20162022 and for the years ended September 30, 2017,2020, September 30, 20162021 and September 30, 20152022

4851


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Haynes International, Inc.

Kokomo, INOpinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Haynes International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 20172022 and 2016, and2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017.2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017,2022, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

52

Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matter

        InThe critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, referredtaken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to above present fairly, in all material respects,which it relates.

U.S. Pension and Postretirement Plans – Discount Rate - Refer to Notes 2 and 9 to the financial positionstatements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan (“pension”) and postretirement health care benefits (“OPEB”) in the U.S. covering most of Haynes International, Inc.its current and subsidiaries asformer employees.  As of September 30, 2017 and 2016,2022, the pension projected benefit obligation was $223.9 million and the resultsOPEB projected benefit obligation was $64.0 million. The actuarial determination of their operationsthe pension and OPEB projected benefit obligations on an annual basis requires management to make significant assumptions related to the selection of the discount rates used in the calculation of the net present value of future pension and OPEB benefits. The Company establishes the discount rates assumption for the U.S. pension and OPEB plans utilizing the FTSE Pension Discount Curve and projected benefit payments.

Given the significance of the U.S. pension and OPEB projected benefit obligations and their cash flows for eachsensitivity to a change in the discount rates, management was required to make significant assumptions related to the selection of the three yearsdiscount rates.  Therefore, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the discount rates selected by management for the U.S. pension and OPEB plansrequired a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our actuarial specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the period ended September 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted inAudit

Our audit procedures related to the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,discount rates for the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reportingU.S. pension and OPEB plans selected by management included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over the valuation of the U.S. pension and OPEB projected benefit obligations, including management's controls over selection of the discount rates.
With the assistance of our actuarial specialists:
oWe evaluated the methodology utilized to select the discount rates for conformity with applicable accounting guidance.
oWe tested the source information underlying the determination of the discount rates, including the methodology used to construct the yield curve and the mathematical accuracy of the calculation.
oWe evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s selection and use of the external published yield curve used by management to determine the discount rates.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Indianapolis, IN
November 17, 2022

We have served as of September 30, 2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Company's auditor since fiscal year 1998.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Indianapolis, IN

November 16, 2017

4953


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSSHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

    

September 30, 

    

September 30, 

 

2021

2022

 

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

47,726

$

8,440

Accounts receivable, less allowance for credit losses of $553 and $428 at September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022, respectively

 

57,964

 

94,912

Inventories

 

248,495

 

357,556

Income taxes receivable

 

1,292

 

Other current assets

 

6,129

 

3,514

Total current assets

 

361,606

 

464,422

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

147,248

 

142,772

Deferred income taxes

 

16,397

 

5,680

Other assets

 

10,829

 

9,723

Goodwill

4,789

4,789

Other intangible assets, net

 

5,586

 

4,909

Total assets

$

546,455

$

632,295

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

47,680

$

54,886

Accrued expenses

 

20,100

 

19,294

Income taxes payable

 

379

 

828

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 

3,554

 

3,371

Deferred revenue—current portion

 

2,500

 

2,500

Total current liabilities

 

74,213

 

80,879

Revolving credit facilities - Long-term

 

 

74,721

Long-term obligations (less current portion)

 

8,301

 

7,848

Deferred revenue (less current portion)

 

10,329

 

7,829

Deferred income taxes

3,459

3,103

Operating lease liabilities

664

576

Accrued pension benefits (less current portion)

 

26,663

 

21,090

Accrued postretirement benefits (less current portion)

79,505

60,761

Total liabilities

 

203,134

 

256,807

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

Common stock, $0.001 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized, 12,757,778 and 12,854,773 shares issued and 12,562,140 and 12,479,741 shares outstanding at September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022, respectively)

 

13

 

13

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value (20,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding)

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

262,057

 

266,193

Accumulated earnings

 

101,015

 

135,040

Treasury stock, 195,638 shares at September 30, 2021 and 375,032 shares at September 30, 2022

 

(7,423)

 

(14,666)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(12,341)

 

(11,092)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

343,321

 

375,488

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

546,455

$

632,295

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30, 

    

September 30, 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

59,297

 

$

46,328

 

Restricted cash (Note 21)

 

 

5,446

 

 

 —

 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $402 and $620 at September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2017, respectively

 

 

61,612

 

 

61,602

 

Inventories

 

 

236,558

 

 

244,457

 

Income taxes receivable

 

 

538

 

 

 —

 

Other current assets

 

 

2,809

 

 

2,781

 

Total current assets

 

 

366,260

 

 

355,168

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

199,182

 

 

192,556

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

71,010

 

 

58,133

 

Other assets

 

 

1,798

 

 

5,107

 

Goodwill

 

 

4,789

 

 

4,789

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

 

6,562

 

 

6,066

 

Total assets

 

$

649,601

 

$

621,819

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

29,925

 

$

32,802

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

12,880

 

 

14,108

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

 —

 

 

195

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 

 

5,095

 

 

5,095

 

Deferred revenue—current portion

 

 

7,488

 

 

2,500

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

55,388

 

 

54,700

 

Long-term obligations (less current portion) (Note 18)

 

 

8,256

 

 

7,896

 

Deferred revenue (less current portion)

 

 

22,829

 

 

20,329

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

1,578

 

 

1,741

 

Accrued pension benefits (less current portion)

 

 

130,134

 

 

90,957

 

Accrued postretirement benefits (less current portion)

 

 

120,117

 

 

112,424

 

Total liabilities

 

 

338,302

 

 

288,047

 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized, 12,520,308 and 12,544,933 shares issued and 12,491,149 and 12,509,757 outstanding at September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2017, respectively)

 

 

12

 

 

13

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value (20,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

246,625

 

 

248,733

 

Accumulated earnings

 

 

180,565

 

 

159,366

 

Treasury stock, 29,159 shares at September 30, 2016 and 35,176 shares at September 30, 2017

 

 

(1,380)

 

 

(1,646)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(114,523)

 

 

(72,694)

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

311,299

 

 

333,772

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

649,601

 

$

621,819

 

54

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

September 30,

September 30,

September 30,

 

    

2020

2021

2022

 

Net revenues

    

$

380,530

$

337,661

$

490,461

Cost of sales

 

335,898

 

297,931

 

384,128

Gross profit

 

44,632

 

39,730

 

106,333

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

40,307

 

43,470

 

47,089

Research and technical expense

 

3,713

 

3,403

 

3,822

Operating income (loss)

 

612

 

(7,143)

 

55,422

Nonoperating retirement benefit expense (income)

6,822

 

1,470

 

(4,655)

Interest income

 

(44)

 

(16)

 

(18)

Interest expense

 

1,332

 

1,186

 

2,481

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

(7,498)

 

(9,783)

 

57,614

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

(1,020)

 

(1,100)

 

12,527

Net income (loss)

$

(6,478)

$

(8,683)

$

45,087

Net income (loss) per share:

Basic

$

(0.53)

$

(0.71)

$

3.62

Diluted

$

(0.53)

$

(0.71)

$

3.57

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

Basic

12,471

12,500

12,346

Diluted

12,471

12,500

12,506

Dividends declared per common share

$

0.88

$

0.88

$

0.88

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5055


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except share and per share data)thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

Net revenues

    

$

487,635

 

$

406,359

 

$

395,209

 

Cost of sales

 

 

393,971

 

 

358,779

 

 

365,499

 

Gross profit

 

 

93,664

 

 

47,580

 

 

29,710

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

42,572

 

 

39,684

 

 

42,393

 

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,598

 

 

3,698

 

 

3,855

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

47,494

 

 

4,198

 

 

(16,538)

 

Interest income

 

 

(94)

 

 

(108)

 

 

(186)

 

Interest expense

 

 

412

 

 

555

 

 

865

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

47,176

 

 

3,751

 

 

(17,217)

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

 

16,690

 

 

(1,269)

 

 

(7,027)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

30,486

 

$

5,020

 

$

(10,190)

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.45

 

$

0.40

 

$

(0.83)

 

Diluted

 

$

2.45

 

$

0.40

 

$

(0.83)

 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,332

 

 

12,361

 

 

12,397

 

Diluted

 

 

12,344

 

 

12,366

 

 

12,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

September 30,

September 30,

September 30,

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Net income (loss)

$

(6,478)

$

(8,683)

$

45,087

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Pension and postretirement

 

15,630

 

59,006

 

13,066

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

3,690

 

3,254

 

(11,817)

Other comprehensive income

19,320

62,260

1,249

Comprehensive income

$

12,842

$

53,577

$

46,336

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5156


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

30,486

 

$

5,020

 

$

(10,190)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement

 

 

(21,958)

 

 

(19,569)

 

 

39,624

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

(7,001)

 

 

2,205

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(26,125)

 

 

(26,570)

 

 

41,829

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

4,361

 

$

(21,550)

 

$

31,639

 

Accumulated

 

Additional

Other

Total

 

Common Stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

Treasury

Comprehensive

Stockholders’

 

    

Shares

    

Par

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Stock

    

Income (Loss)

    

Equity

 

Balance October 1, 2019

 

12,513,500

$

13

$

253,843

$

125,296

$

(2,239)

$

(80,638)

$

296,275

Net income (loss)

(6,478)

 

(6,478)

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

(11,158)

 

(11,158)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

19,320

 

19,320

Exercise of stock options

 

12,400

422

 

422

Reclass due to adoption of ASU 2018-02

13,283

(13,283)

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

101,911

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(5,440)

(198)

 

(198)

Stock compensation

3,318

 

3,318

Balance September 30, 2020

 

12,622,371

$

13

$

257,583

$

120,943

$

(2,437)

$

(74,601)

$

301,501

Net income (loss)

(8,683)

 

(8,683)

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

(11,245)

 

(11,245)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

62,260

 

62,260

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

76,498

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(136,729)

(4,986)

 

(4,986)

Stock compensation

4,474

 

4,474

Balance September 30, 2021

 

12,562,140

$

13

$

262,057

$

101,015

$

(7,423)

$

(12,341)

$

343,321

Net income (loss)

45,087

 

45,087

Dividends paid and accrued ($0.88 per share)

(11,062)

 

(11,062)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

1,249

 

1,249

Exercise of stock options

 

14,558

537

 

537

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

82,437

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(179,394)

(7,243)

 

(7,243)

Stock compensation

3,599

 

3,599

Balance September 30, 2022

 

12,479,741

$

13

$

266,193

$

135,040

$

(14,666)

$

(11,092)

$

375,488

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5257


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYCASH FLOWS

(in thousands, except share data)thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Treasury

 

Comprehensive

 

Stockholders’

 

 

    

Shares

    

Par

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Stock

    

Income (Loss)

    

Equity

 

Balance September 30, 2014

 

12,418,471

 

$

12

 

$

242,387

 

$

166,999

 

$

(840)

 

$

(61,828)

 

$

346,730

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,486

 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,952)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,952)

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(26,125)

 

 

(26,125)

 

Tax impact of forfeited vested options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28)

 

Tax impact of dividends on restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55)

 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

32,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(5,221)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(251)

 

 

 

 

 

(251)

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,184

 

Balance September 30, 2015

 

12,446,000

 

$

12

 

$

244,488

 

$

186,533

 

$

(1,091)

 

$

(87,953)

 

$

341,989

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,020

 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,988)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,988)

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(26,570)

 

 

(26,570)

 

Exercise of stock options

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

310

 

Tax impact of forfeited vested options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(114)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(114)

 

Tax impact of dividends on restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(39)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(39)

 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

42,810

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(7,661)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(289)

 

 

 

 

 

(289)

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,980

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,980

 

Balance September 30, 2016

 

12,491,149

 

$

12

 

$

246,625

 

$

180,565

 

$

(1,380)

 

$

(114,523)

 

$

311,299

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,190)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,190)

 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,009)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,009)

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,829

 

 

41,829

 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

24,625

 

 

1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(6,017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(266)

 

 

 

 

 

(266)

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,109

 

Balance September 30, 2017

 

12,509,757

 

$

13

 

$

248,733

 

$

159,366

 

$

(1,646)

��

$

(72,694)

 

$

333,772

 

    

Year Ended September 30, 

    

2021

    

2022

    

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss)

$

(8,683)

$

45,087

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Depreciation

 

19,100

 

18,289

Amortization

 

467

 

780

Pension and post-retirement expense - U.S. and U.K.

 

8,100

 

1,898

Change in long-term obligations

 

9

 

(136)

Stock compensation expense

 

4,474

 

3,599

Deferred revenue

 

(2,500)

 

(2,500)

Deferred income taxes

 

(2,436)

 

6,442

Loss on disposition of property

 

173

 

18

Change in assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

 

(6,159)

 

(42,710)

Inventories

 

(777)

 

(116,780)

Other assets

 

(4,926)

 

3,464

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

33,869

 

10,696

Income taxes

 

2,859

 

1,780

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 

(20,305)

 

(9,408)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

23,265

 

(79,481)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

(5,949)

 

(15,114)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(5,949)

 

(15,114)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Revolving credit facility borrowings

 

115,528

Revolving credit facility repayments

 

(40,807)

Dividends paid

 

(11,175)

 

(11,072)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

537

Payment for purchase of treasury stock

 

(4,986)

 

(7,243)

Payment for debt issuance cost

 

(997)

 

(103)

Payments on long-term obligations

(285)

(278)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(17,443)

 

56,562

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 

615

 

(1,253)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:

 

488

 

(39,286)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Beginning of period

 

47,238

 

47,726

End of period

$

47,726

$

8,440

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Interest (net of capitalized interest)

$

855

$

1,206

Income taxes paid (refunded), net

$

(1,580)

$

3,671

Capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid

$

666

$

242

Dividends declared but not yet paid

$

210

$

199

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5358


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

30,486

 

$

5,020

 

$

(10,190)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

18,997

 

 

20,533

 

 

21,601

 

Amortization

 

 

511

 

 

503

 

 

496

 

Pension and post-retirement expense - U.S. and U.K.

 

 

12,592

 

 

19,048

 

 

23,435

 

Change in long-term obligations

 

 

(498)

 

 

73

 

 

(15)

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

2,184

 

 

1,980

 

 

2,109

 

Excess tax expense from restricted stock vesting

 

 

55

 

 

153

 

 

 —

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

(2,500)

 

 

2,488

 

 

(7,488)

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

2,810

 

 

1,428

 

 

(10,072)

 

Loss on disposition of property

 

 

399

 

 

438

 

 

612

 

Change in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash

 

 

 —

 

 

(5,446)

 

 

5,446

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(5,011)

 

 

10,965

 

 

755

 

Inventories

 

 

4,073

 

 

6,611

 

 

(6,982)

 

Other assets

 

 

117

 

 

237

 

 

287

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(8,685)

 

 

(1,782)

 

 

3,476

 

Income taxes

 

 

(99)

 

 

3,773

 

 

709

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 

 

(7,036)

 

 

(12,035)

 

 

(11,052)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

48,395

 

 

53,987

 

 

13,127

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

 

(18,546)

 

 

(31,633)

 

 

(15,006)

 

Acquisition of Leveltek - LaPorte assets

 

 

(14,600)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(33,146)

 

 

(31,633)

 

 

(15,006)

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(10,952)

 

 

(10,988)

 

 

(11,009)

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

 —

 

 

310

 

 

 —

 

Payment for purchase of treasury stock

 

 

(251)

 

 

(289)

 

 

(266)

 

Excess tax expense from restricted stock vesting

 

 

(55)

 

 

(153)

 

 

 —

 

Payment for debt issuance cost

 

 

 —

 

 

(291)

 

 

 —

 

Payments on long-term obligation

 

 

(173)

 

 

(91)

 

 

(166)

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(11,431)

 

 

(11,502)

 

 

(11,441)

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 

 

(644)

 

 

(600)

 

 

351

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

3,174

 

 

10,252

 

 

(12,969)

 

Cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of period

 

 

45,871

 

 

49,045

 

 

59,297

 

End of period

 

$

49,045

 

$

59,297

 

$

46,328

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest (net of capitalized interest)

 

$

347

 

$

486

 

$

807

 

Income taxes paid (refunded), net

 

$

14,017

 

$

(6,471)

 

$

2,335

 

Capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid

 

$

1,741

 

$

1,869

 

$

1,910

 

Lease obligation incurred

 

$

4,500

 

$

 —

 

$

4,100

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

54


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTATEMENTS

(in thousands, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)

Note 1.  Background and Organization

Description of Business

Haynes International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “Haynes”, “we”, “our” or “us”) develops, manufactures, markets and distributes technologically advanced, high-performance alloys primarily for use in the aerospace, industrial gas turbine and chemical processing industries. The Company’s products are high-temperature resistant alloys (“HTA”) and corrosion-resistant alloys (“CRA”). The Company’s HTA products are used by manufacturers of equipment that is subjected to extremely high temperatures, such as jet engines for the aerospace industry, gas turbine engines for power generation, waste incineration and industrial heating equipment. The Company’s CRA products are used in applications that require resistance to extreme corrosion, such as chemical processing, power plant emissions control and hazardous waste treatment. The Company produces its high-performance alloys primarily in sheet, coil and plate forms. In addition, the Company produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars, and in slab, bar, billets and wire forms.

High-performance alloys are characterized by highly engineered, often proprietary, metallurgical formulations primarily of nickel, cobalt and other metals with complex physical properties. The complexity of the manufacturing process for high-performance alloys is reflected in the Company’s relatively high average selling price per pound, compared to the average selling price of other metals, such as carbon steel sheet, stainless steel sheet and aluminum. The high-performance alloy industry has significant barriers to entry such as the combination of (i) demanding end-user specifications, (ii) a multi-stage manufacturing process and (iii) the technical sales, marketing and manufacturing expertise required to develop and sell new applications.

COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 related disruptionsnegatively impacted the Company’s financial and operating results in the second half of fiscal 2020 and the full year of fiscal 2021.  In particular, the pandemic negatively impacted the aerospace supply chain, however markets other than aerospace were also depressed during that time period.  

Note 22.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

A.Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations

A.

Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Haynes International, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated. The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Mountain Home, North Carolina; and Arcadia, Louisiana with service centers in Lebanon, Indiana; LaPorte, Indiana; LaMirada, California; Houston, Texas; Windsor, Connecticut; Openshaw, England; Lenzburg, Switzerland; Shanghai, China; and sales offices in Paris, France; Zurich, Switzerland; Singapore; Milan, Italy; and Tokyo, Japan.

B.Cash and Cash Equivalents

B.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments, including investments with original maturities of three months or less at acquisition, to be cash equivalents, the carrying value of which approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these investments.

C.Accounts Receivable

C.

Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accountscredit losses for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company markets its products to a diverse customer base, both in the United

59

States of America and overseas. Trade credit is extended based upon evaluation of each customer’s ability to perform its obligation, which is updated periodically. The Company purchases credit insurance for certain foreign trade receivables.

55


D.Revenue Recognition

D.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when collectability is reasonably assured andperformance obligations under the terms of customer contracts are satisfied which occurs when title passescontrol of the goods has been transferred to the customer which is generally at the time of shipment with freight terms of free on board (FOB) shipping point or at a foreign port for certain export customers.and services have been performed.  Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a component of net sales in the periods in which the related sales are recognized. The Company determines this allowance based on historical experience. Additionally, the Company recognizes revenue attributable to an up-front fee received from Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET) as a result of a twenty-year agreement entered into on November 17, 2006 to provide conversion services to TIMET. See Note 15, Deferred Revenue for a description of accounting treatment relating to this up-front fee.

E.Inventories

E.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. The cost of inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market or scrap value, if applicable, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions.

F.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

F.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company has goodwill, patents, trademarks, customer relationships and other intangibles.intangibles as of September 30, 2022. As the patents and customer relationships have a definite life, they are amortized over lives ranging from two to sixteenfifteen years. The Company reviews patents and customer relationships for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Goodwill and trademarks (indefinite lived) are tested for impairment at least annually as of January 31 for goodwill and August 31 for trademarks (the annual impairment testing dates), or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. If the carrying value of the trademarks exceeds the fair value (determined using an income approach, based upon a discounted cash flow of an assumed royalty rate), impairment of the trademark may exist resulting in a charge to earnings to the extent of the impairment. The impairment test for goodwill is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment loss in the event that the carrying amount is greater than the fair value.  Any goodwill impairment loss recognized would not exceed the total carrying amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  No impairment was recognized in the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 or 20172022 because the fair value exceeded the carrying values.

During fiscal 2017,2020, 2021 and 2022, there were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill.

Amortization of the patents, non-competes, customer relationships and other intangibles was $511, $503$228, $467 and $496$780 for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, respectively. The following represents a summary of intangible assets at September 30, 20162021 and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Gross

    

Accumulated

    

Carrying

 

September 30, 2016

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

Patents

 

$

4,030

 

$

(3,370)

 

$

660

 

Trademarks

 

 

3,800

 

 

 —

 

 

3,800

 

Customer relationships

 

 

2,100

 

 

(275)

 

 

1,825

 

Other

 

 

291

 

 

(14)

 

 

277

 

 

 

$

10,221

 

$

(3,659)

 

$

6,562

 

2022:

    

Gross

    

Accumulated

    

Carrying

 

September 30, 2021

Amount

Amortization

Amount

 

Trademarks

$

3,800

$

$

3,800

Customer relationships

2,100

(995)

1,105

Other

 

997

(316)

681

$

6,897

$

(1,311)

$

5,586

5660


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Gross

    

Accumulated

    

Carrying

 

September 30, 2017

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

Patents

 

$

4,030

 

$

(3,656)

 

$

374

 

Trademarks

 

 

3,800

 

 

 —

 

 

3,800

 

Customer relationships

 

 

2,100

 

 

(426)

 

 

1,674

 

Other

 

 

291

 

 

(73)

 

 

218

 

 

 

$

10,221

 

$

(4,155)

 

$

6,066

 

    

Gross

    

Accumulated

    

Carrying

 

September 30, 2022

Amount

Amortization

Amount

 

Trademarks

$

3,800

$

$

3,800

Customer relationships

2,100

(1,128)

972

Other

 

1,100

(963)

137

$

7,000

$

(2,091)

$

4,909

 

 

 

 

Estimated future Aggregate Amortization Expense:

    

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 

 

 

 

2018

$

527

 

2019

 

256

 

2020

 

198

 

2021

 

180

 

2022

 

133

 

Thereafter

 

972

 

Estimated future Aggregate Amortization Expense:

    

 

Year Ending September 30, 

2023

$

216

2024

 

176

2025

 

123

2026

 

120

2027

 

116

Thereafter

 

358

G.Property, Plant and Equipment

G.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost with depreciation calculated primarily by using the straight-line method based on estimated economic useful lives, which are generally as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

 

40

 years

Machinery and equipment

 

 5

14

 years

Land improvements

 

 

 

20

 years

Buildings and improvements

40

 years

Machinery and equipment

 

5

14

 years

Land improvements

 

20

 years

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs and minor renewals are charged to expense; major renewals are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale of assets, the cost of the disposed assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to operations.

The Company records capitalized interest for long-term construction projects to capture the cost of capital committed prior to the placed in service date as a part of the historical cost of acquiring the asset. Interest is not capitalized when the balance on the revolver is zero.

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The reviews are conducted at the lowest identifiable level of cash flows for the identified asset group.  Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and usedthe asset group is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.asset group. No impairment was recognized during the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 or 2017.2022.

H.Environmental Remediation

H.

Environmental Remediation

When it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset of the Company has been impaired, a loss is recognized assuming the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The measurement of environmental liabilities by the Company is based on currently available facts, present laws and regulations and current technology. Such estimates take into consideration the expected costs of post-closure monitoring based on historical experience.   Amounts accrued for post-closure monitoring are presented in Note 18, Long-term Obligations.  

I.Pension and Postretirement Benefits

I.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits

The Company has defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering most of its current and former employees. Significant elements in determining the assets or liabilities and related income or expense for these plans are the expected return on plan assets, the discount rate used to value future payment streams, expected trends in health care

61

costs and other actuarial assumptions. Annually, the Company evaluates the significant assumptions to be used to value

57


its pension and postretirement plan assets and liabilities based on current market conditions and expectations of future costs. If actual results are less favorable than those projected by management, additional expense may be required in future periods. Salaried employees hired after December 31, 2005 and hourly employees hired after June 30, 2007 are not covered by the pension plan; however, they are eligible for an enhanced matching program of the defined contribution plan (401(k)). Effective December 31, 2007, the U.S. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for all non-union employees in the U.S. Effective September 30, 2009, the U.K. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for employees in the plan. Effective January 1, 2007, a plan amendment of the postretirement medical plan caps the Company’s liability related to retiree health care costs at $5,000 annually.  Effective October 1, 2009, the U.S. postretirement plan was closed for all non-union employees.  

J.Foreign Currency Exchange

J.

Foreign Currency Exchange

The Company’s foreign operating entities’ financial statements are denominated in the functional currencies of each respective country, which are the local currencies. All assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of the year, and revenues and expenses are translated at the weighted average rate for the year. Translation gains or losses are recorded as a separate component of comprehensive income (loss) and transaction gains and losses are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.

K.ResearchGains and Technical Costslosses arising from the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on transactions in foreign currency are included in selling, general and administrative expense. The Company has entered into foreign currency forward contracts (See Note 20, Foreign Currency Forward Contracts) with the purpose to reduce income statement volatility resulting from transaction gains and losses.

K.

Research and Technical Costs

Research and technical costs related to the development of new products and processes are expensed as incurred. Research and technical costs for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 20172022 were $3,598, $3,698$3,713, $3,403 and $3,855,$3,822, respectively.

L.Income Taxes

L.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company utilizes prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. The Company records uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) it is determined whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority (See Note 6,7, Income Taxes).

M.Stock Based Compensation

M.

Stock-based Compensation

As described in Note 11,12, the Company has incentive compensation plans that provide for the issuance of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, stock options and stock appreciation rights to key employees and non-employee directors.  To date, the Company has only issued restricted stock, performance shares and stock options.  The stock-based compensation grants typically have a vesting period before the employee can take receipt of the stock or becomes eligible to exercises stock options.  Employees earn and receive dividends from the restricted stock during this vesting period and accumulated dividends related to performance shares are paid to the employees at the time that the shares are received by the employee after the end of the vesting period.  The Company recognizes compensation expense under the fair-value based method as a component of operating expenses.  

62

N.Financial Instruments and ConcentrationsTable of RiskContents

N.

Financial Instruments and Concentrations of Risk

The Company may periodically enter into forward currency exchange contracts to minimize the variability in the Company’s operating results arising from foreign exchange rate movements. The Company does not engage in foreign currency speculation. At September 30, 20162021 and 2017,2022, the Company had no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.  To date, all foreign currency contracts have been settled prior to the end of the month in which they were initiated.  

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. At September 30, 2017,2022, and periodically throughout the year, the Company has

58


maintained cash balances in excess of federally insured limits. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

During 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, the Company did not have sales to any group of affiliated customers that were greater than 10% of net revenues. The Company generally does not require collateral with the exception of letters of credit with certain foreign sales. Credit losses have been within management’s expectations. In addition, the Company purchases credit insurance for certain foreign trade receivables.amounted to $139, $74 and $171 in fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.  The Company does not believe it is significantly vulnerable to the risk of near-term severe impact from business concentrations with respect to customers, suppliers, products, markets or geographic areas.

O.Accounting Estimates

O.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts,credit losses, inventories, income taxes, asset impairment, incremental borrowing rates, retirement benefits and environmental matters. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, pension asset mix and in some cases, actuarial techniques, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The Company routinely reevaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

P.Earnings Per Share

P.

Earnings Per Share

The Company accounts for earnings per share using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation that determines net income per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to participation rights in undistributed earnings. Non-vested restricted stock awards that include non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities.  Per share amounts are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each period. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except the denominator is increased to

63

include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.

59


Basic and diluted net income per share were computed as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended September 30,

 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Numerator: Basic and Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

30,486

 

$

5,020

 

$

(10,190)

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(10,952)

 

 

(10,988)

 

 

(11,009)

 

Undistributed income (loss)

 

 

19,534

 

 

(5,968)

 

 

(21,199)

 

Percentage allocated to common shares (a)

 

 

99.1

%

 

99.0

%

 

100.0

%

Undistributed income (loss) allocated to common shares

 

 

19,358

 

 

(5,910)

 

 

(21,199)

 

Dividends paid on common shares outstanding

 

 

10,853

 

 

10,881

 

 

10,905

 

Net income (loss) available to common shares

 

 

30,211

 

 

4,971

 

 

(10,294)

 

Denominator: Basic and Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

12,331,805

 

 

12,361,483

 

 

12,397,099

 

Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares

 

 

12,404

 

 

4,714

 

 

 —

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted

 

 

12,344,209

 

 

12,366,197

 

 

12,397,099

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share

 

$

2.45

 

$

0.40

 

$

(0.83)

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share

 

$

2.45

 

$

0.40

 

$

(0.83)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of stock option shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

 

 

289,130

 

 

378,852

 

 

310,417

 

Number of restrictive stock shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

 

 

111,450

 

 

121,285

 

 

107,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Percentage allocated to common shares - weighted average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares outstanding

 

 

12,331,805

 

 

12,361,483

 

 

12,397,099

 

Unvested participating shares

 

 

112,275

 

 

121,185

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

12,444,080

 

 

12,482,668

 

 

12,397,099

 

Years ended September 30,

 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Numerator: Basic and Diluted

Net income (loss)

$

(6,478)

$

(8,683)

$

45,087

Dividends

 

(11,158)

 

(11,245)

 

(11,062)

Undistributed income (loss)

 

(17,636)

 

(19,928)

 

34,025

Percentage allocated to common shares (a)

 

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

 

99.0

%

Undistributed income (loss) allocated to common shares

(17,636)

(19,928)

33,699

Dividends paid on common shares outstanding

 

11,071

 

11,098

 

10,955

Net income (loss) available to common shares

(6,565)

(8,830)

44,654

Denominator: Basic and Diluted

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

12,470,664

 

12,499,609

 

12,346,025

Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares

 

 

 

159,475

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted

 

12,470,664

 

12,499,609

 

12,505,500

Basic net income (loss) per share

$

(0.53)

$

(0.71)

$

3.62

Diluted net income (loss) per share

$

(0.53)

$

(0.71)

$

3.57

Number of stock option shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

 

285,699

 

385,548

 

261,228

Number of restricted stock shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

 

96,999

 

165,794

 

50,415

Number of deferred restricted stock shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

34,498

 

30,529

 

2,791

Number of performance share awards excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

47,195

 

76,266

 

46,693

(a) Percentage allocated to common shares - weighted average

Common shares outstanding

 

12,470,664

 

12,499,609

 

12,346,025

Unvested participating shares

 

 

 

119,549

 

12,470,664

 

12,499,609

 

12,465,574

Q.Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Q.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The objective of the update is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2015-14 deferred the effective date of the update to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.

In May, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).   This update removes the requirements to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share. The amendment is effective for annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  Beginning in fiscal 2017, the Company has removed investments in which fair value is measured using net asset value from the fair value hierarchy table within the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements.   

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330).  The objective of this update was to simplify the measurement of inventory valuation at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation.  It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.  The adoption of these changes is not expected to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

60


In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of interest (Subtopic 835-30): The guidance requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.  In August 2015, the clarification was released (ASU 2015-15) to address presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements.  This amendment allows for the reporting entity to defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortize the debt issuance costs over the term of the line-of-credit agreement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement, including interim periods within that reporting period.  It was implemented in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and did not result in a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.

In FebruaryJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 842).  This326) which introduced the expected credit losses methodology for the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost basis, replacing the previous incurred loss methodology.  The new guidance will require thatcurrent expected credit loss (CECL) methodology does not have a lessee recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheetminimum threshold for all leases with a lease term of more than twelve months, with the result being the recognition of impairment losses, and entities will need to measure expected credit losses on assets that have a rightlow risk of use asset and a lease liability.  The new lease accounting requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 18, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements. 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and other (Topic 350).loss.  This new guidance simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill, which is currently required if a reporting unit with goodwill fails a Step 1 test comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value including goodwill.  Under this new guidance, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test using only the Step 1 test of comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.  Any goodwill impairment, representing the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, is determined using this Step 1 test.  Any goodwill impairment loss recognized would not exceed the total carrying amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  This new guidanceupdate is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted.2019.  The Company adopted this new guidance in 2017.  Adoption of this guidancestandard on October 1, 2020.  This standard did not result inhave a material impact toon the Company’s consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016,2020, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 718): Improvements848).  This new update provides optional expedients to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  The objectiveease the potential burden of this update was to simplify the accounting for share-based paymentthe effects of reference rate reform as it pertains to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions includingaffected by the income tax consequencesdiscontinuation of awards as either equitythe London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.  The new share-based compensation accounting requirementsby another reference rate expected to be discontinued.  These amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning afterimmediately and may be applied prospectively to modifications made or relationships entered into or evaluated on or before December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company adopted this new guidance in fiscal 2017, and the31, 2022.  This standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statementsCompany’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

64

Note 3.  Revenues from Contracts with Customers

The Company applies a five-step analysis to: (i) identify the contract with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and notes was immaterial. (v) recognize revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation.  The Company’s revenue from contracts with customers is generated primarily from providing high-performance alloys, manufactured to the specifications of its customers, along with conversion services to certain customers.  

Performance Obligations

In March 2017,Revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715).terms of contracts with the customer are satisfied, which occurs when control of the goods and services has been transferred to the customer.  This new guidance requires entities to (1) disaggregatepredominately occurs upon shipment or delivery of the product or when the service cost componentis performed. 

The Company may occasionally have customer agreements involving production and shipment of goods that would require revenue to be recognized over time due to there being no alternative use for the product without significant economic loss and an enforceable right to payment including a normal profit margin from the customer in the event of contract termination.  As of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022, the Company did not have any customer agreements that would require revenue to be recorded over time. 

Each customer purchase order or contract for goods transferred represents a single performance obligation for which revenue is recognized at either a point in time or over-time as described in the preceding paragraph. The standard terms and conditions of a customer purchase order include limited warranties and the right of customers to have products that do not meet specifications repaired or replaced, at the Company’s option.  Such warranties do not represent a separate performance obligation.

The customer agreement with Titanium Metals Corporation (“TIMET”) (See Note 15) includes the performance obligation to provide conversion services for up to ten million pounds of titanium metal annually over a twenty-year period which ends in fiscal 2027.  The transaction price under this contract included a $50,000 up-front fee as well as conversion service fees based upon the fulfillment of conversion services requested at the option of TIMET.  The $50,000 fee is allocated to the obligation to provide manufacturing capacity over time and, therefore, is recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the 20-year term of that agreement.  The fees for conversion services are based on quantity of service and are recognized as revenue at the time the service is performed. 

Transaction Price

Each customer purchase order or contract sets forth the transaction price for the products and services purchased under that arrangement.  Some customer arrangements may include variable consideration, such as volume rebates, which generally depend upon the Company’s customers meeting specified performance criteria, such as a purchasing level over a period of time.  The Company exercises judgment to estimate the most likely amount of variable consideration at each reporting date.

Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for the transfer of goods or services to customers. Revenue is derived from product sales or conversion services, and is reported net of sales discounts, rebates, incentives, returns and other componentsallowances offered to customers, if applicable.   Payment terms vary from customer to customer depending upon credit worthiness, prior payment history and other credit considerations.  

Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling activities to fulfill the Company’s promise to transfer of the goods are included in revenues and costs incurred by the Company for the delivery of goods and are classified as cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. Shipping terms may vary for products shipped outside the United States depending on the mode of transportation, the country where the material is shipped and any agreements made with the customers.

65

Contract Balances

As of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022, accounts receivable with customers were $58,517 and $95,340, respectively.  Allowance for credit losses as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022 were $553 and $428, respectively, and are presented within accounts receivable, less allowance for credit losses on the consolidated balance sheet.    

Contract liabilities are recognized when the Company has received consideration from a customer to transfer goods or services at a future point in time when the Company performs under the purchase order or contract.  As of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022, no contract liabilities have been recorded except for $12,829 and $10,329, respectively, for the TIMET agreement and $1,060 and $700 for accrued product returns, respectively. 

Practical Expedients

The Company has elected to use the practical expedient that permits the omission of disclosure for remaining performance obligations which are expected to be satisfied within one year or less.  Aside from the TIMET agreement, the Company does not have any remaining performance obligations in excess of one year or contracts that it does not have the right to invoice as of September 30, 2022.  The Company does not adjust for the time value of money as the majority of its contracts have an original expected duration of one year or less; contracts that are greater than one year are related to net revenues that are constrained until the subsequent sales occur.  

Disaggregation of Revenue

Revenue is disaggregated by end-use markets.  The following table includes a breakdown of net benefit cost and present it with other current compensation costsrevenues to the markets served by the Company for related employees in the income statement and (2) present the other components elsewhere in the income statement and outside of income from operations if that subtotal is presented.  In addition, the ASU requires entities to disclose the income statement lines that contain the other components if they are not presented on appropriately described separate lines.  This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.ended September 30, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Year Ended

September 30, 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

Net revenues (dollars in thousands)

Aerospace

$

191,980

$

128,072

$

230,001

Chemical processing

 

63,170

 

63,147

 

91,665

Industrial gas turbine

 

56,576

 

66,772

 

91,878

Other markets

 

45,099

 

58,090

 

53,706

Total product revenue

 

356,825

 

316,081

 

467,250

Other revenue

 

23,705

 

21,580

 

23,211

Net revenues

$

380,530

$

337,661

$

490,461

61


See Note 13 for revenue disaggregated by geography and product group.  

Note 3.4.  Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. The cost of inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. The following is a summary of the major classes of inventories:

September 30, 

September 30, 

 

    

2021

    

2022

    

 

Raw Materials

$

22,711

$

31,887

Work-in-process

 

138,609

 

226,572

Finished Goods

 

85,797

 

97,657

Other

 

1,378

 

1,440

$

248,495

$

357,556

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 

 

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

 

Raw Materials

 

$

21,587

 

$

18,731

 

 

Work-in-process

 

 

118,822

 

 

130,019

 

 

Finished Goods

 

 

94,772

 

 

94,331

 

 

Other

 

 

1,377

 

 

1,376

 

 

 

 

$

236,558

 

$

244,457

 

 

66

Note 4.5.  Property, Plant and Equipment

The following is a summary of the major classes of property, plant and equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

7,207

 

$

9,345

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

37,343

 

 

44,705

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

262,717

 

 

289,035

 

Construction in process

 

 

28,562

 

 

5,692

 

 

 

 

335,829

 

 

348,777

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(136,647)

 

 

(156,221)

 

 

 

$

199,182

 

$

192,556

 

September 30,

 

    

2021

    

2022

 

Land and land improvements

$

10,266

$

10,158

Buildings and improvements

 

46,241

 

45,872

Machinery and equipment

 

306,161

 

313,841

Construction in process

 

3,344

 

8,756

 

366,012

 

378,627

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(218,764)

 

(235,855)

$

147,248

$

142,772

As of September 30, 2017,2021 and 2022, the Company has $275had $145 and $132, respectively, of assets under a capitalfinance lease for equipment related to the service center operation in Shanghai, ChinaChina.  Additionally, the Company had $6,073 and $7,913$5,643 of assets under capital or finance leases for two buildings at the LaPorte, Indiana service center.center as of September 30, 2021 and 2022, respectively.

Note 5.6.  Accrued Expenses

The following is a summary of the major classes of accrued expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

Employee compensation

 

$

7,394

 

$

7,791

 

Taxes, other than income taxes

 

 

2,264

 

 

2,422

 

Utilities

 

 

992

 

 

909

 

Professional fees

 

 

615

 

 

746

 

Capital lease obligation, current

 

 

383

 

 

926

 

Other

 

 

1,232

 

 

1,314

 

 

 

$

12,880

 

$

14,108

 

September 30,

 

    

2021

    

2022

 

Employee compensation

$

9,424

$

7,734

Taxes, other than income taxes

 

2,798

 

2,897

Accrued product returns

1,060

700

Utilities

1,000

1,383

Professional fees

836

966

Finance lease obligation, current

228

265

Management incentive compensation

3,411

3,609

Other

 

1,343

 

1,740

$

20,100

$

19,294

6267


Note 6.7.  Income Taxes

The components of income (loss) before provision for income taxes and the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Income (loss) before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

36,327

 

$

(4,160)

 

$

(25,090)

 

Foreign

 

 

10,849

 

 

7,911

 

 

7,873

 

Total

 

$

47,176

 

$

3,751

 

$

(17,217)

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

$

11,207

 

$

(4,427)

 

$

933

 

Foreign

 

 

1,690

 

 

1,368

 

 

1,652

 

State

 

 

686

 

 

(141)

 

 

401

 

Total

 

 

13,583

 

 

(3,200)

 

 

2,986

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

 

(79)

 

 

4,582

 

 

(8,781)

 

Foreign

 

 

690

 

 

(105)

 

 

 —

 

State

 

 

2,368

 

 

(2,954)

 

 

(1,427)

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

128

 

 

408

 

 

195

 

Total

 

 

3,107

 

 

1,931

 

 

(10,013)

 

Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

$

16,690

 

$

(1,269)

 

$

(7,027)

 

Year Ended September 30,

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

Income (loss) before income taxes:

U.S.

$

(9,831)

$

(11,417)

$

38,864

Foreign

 

2,333

 

1,634

 

18,750

Total

$

(7,498)

$

(9,783)

$

57,614

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes:

Current:

U.S. Federal

$

(371)

$

741

$

2,031

Foreign

 

541

 

349

 

3,302

State

 

29

 

228

 

639

Total

 

199

 

1,318

 

5,972

Deferred:

U.S. Federal

 

(2,266)

 

(2,986)

 

5,931

Foreign

 

56

 

470

 

120

State

 

(810)

 

(317)

 

(300)

Valuation allowance

 

1,801

 

415

 

804

Total

 

(1,219)

 

(2,418)

 

6,555

Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes

$

(1,020)

$

(1,100)

$

12,527

The provision for income taxes applicable to results of operations differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Statutory federal tax rate

 

 

35

%  

 

35

%  

 

35

%  

Tax provision for income taxes at the statutory rate

 

$

16,512

 

$

1,313

 

$

(6,026)

 

Foreign tax rate differentials

 

 

(1,417)

 

 

(1,505)

 

 

(1,103)

 

Provision for state taxes, net of federal taxes

 

 

818

 

 

778

 

 

(371)

 

U.S. tax on distributed and undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries

 

 

419

 

 

523

 

 

452

 

Manufacturer’s deduction

 

 

(1,213)

 

 

(98)

 

 

 —

 

Tax credits

 

 

(240)

 

 

(1,198)

 

 

(409)

 

State tax rate change impact on deferred tax asset

 

 

1,565

 

 

(1,819)

 

 

192

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

128

 

 

408

 

 

195

 

Other, net

 

 

118

 

 

329

 

 

43

 

Provision for income taxes at effective tax rate

 

$

16,690

 

$

(1,269)

 

$

(7,027)

 

Effective tax rate

 

 

35.4

%  

 

(33.8)

%  

 

40.8

%  

Year Ended September 30,

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Statutory federal tax rate

 

21.00

%  

21.00

%  

21.00

%  

Tax provision for income taxes at the statutory rate

$

(1,575)

$

(2,054)

$

12,099

Foreign tax rate differentials

 

107

 

(59)

 

(307)

Provision for state taxes, net of federal taxes

 

(145)

 

(84)

 

974

U.S. tax on distributed and undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries

 

(289)

 

198

 

984

Foreign derived intangible income deduction

 

 

(966)

Tax credits

 

(1,058)

 

(691)

 

(702)

Federal and state tax rate change impact on deferred tax asset

 

(60)

 

790

 

(206)

Change in valuation allowance

 

1,801

 

415

 

804

Stock compensation

24

138

191

Other, net

 

175

 

247

 

(344)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes at effective tax rate

$

(1,020)

$

(1,100)

$

12,527

Effective tax rate

 

13.6

%  

 

11.2

%  

 

21.7

%  

During fiscal 2015,2020, the Company’s effective tax rate was lower than the federal statutory rate primarily due to an increased valuation allowance on tax credits that are not expected to be able to be utilized before they expire.  

During fiscal 2021, the Company’s effective tax rate was lower than the federal statutory rate primarily due to an increase in the UK tax rate and decreases in the state tax rates and apportionment, both of which resulted in a decrease in net deferred tax assets.

68

During fiscal 2022, the Company’s effective tax rate was higher than the federal statutory rate primarily due to a change in the Indianaprovision for state taxes, net of federal taxes and an increased valuation allowance on tax lawcredits that was enacted in May 2015, which decreased the deferred tax asset and increased tax expense. 

During fiscal 2016, the Company’s effective tax rate was negative relativeare not expected to the statutory rate, primarily duebe able to an increase in the value of the Company’s deferred tax assets driven by a higher state tax rate and research credits.  Additionally, the Company earned a greater proportion of profitability in foreign jurisdictions.

During fiscal 2017, the Company’s effective tax rate was higher than the statutory rate, primarily due to the Company incurring a pre-tax loss in the United States and pre-tax income in the United Kingdom which has a lower effective tax rate than the statutory rate.  When incurring a pre-tax loss, the effective tax rate of the Company will be higher

63


than the statutory rate if certain tax jurisdictions with lower tax rates incur pre-tax income as a partial offset to the pre-tax loss in the United States.utilized before they expire.  

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement benefits

 

$

93,238

 

$

74,602

 

TIMET Agreement

 

 

9,361

 

 

8,417

 

Inventories

 

 

3,405

 

 

2,080

 

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

 

2,264

 

 

2,107

 

Accrued expenses and other

 

 

3,132

 

 

5,277

 

Tax attributes

 

 

1,642

 

 

11,579

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(532)

 

 

(1,017)

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

$

112,510

 

$

103,045

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

(41,645)

 

$

(45,155)

 

Intangible and other

 

 

(1,433)

 

 

(1,498)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

$

(43,078)

 

$

(46,653)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 

$

69,432

 

$

56,392

 

September 30,

 

    

2021

    

2022

 

Deferred tax assets:

Pension and postretirement benefits

$

22,318

$

16,802

TIMET Agreement

 

2,976

 

2,396

Inventories

 

1,498

 

3,225

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

2,034

 

2,096

Accrued expenses and other

 

3,376

 

2,600

Tax attributes

 

11,638

 

5,625

Other assets

299

 

250

Valuation allowance

(3,891)

(4,695)

Total deferred tax assets

$

40,248

$

28,299

Deferred tax liabilities:

Property, plant and equipment, net

$

(25,669)

$

(24,081)

Intangible and other

 

(1,296)

 

(1,414)

Other liabilities

(345)

 

(227)

Total deferred tax liabilities

$

(27,310)

$

(25,722)

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

$

12,938

$

2,577

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $21,530, state tax net operating loss carryforwards of $11,666, tax credits of $3,205 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $2,249. As of September 30, 2016,2022, the Company had state tax net operating loss carryforwards of $3,453,$14,557, tax credits of $1,198$5,193 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $349.$2,392.  Certain state tax attributes and other tax credit attributes begin to expire in 2026 and 2024, respectively, and the foreign tax attributes begin to expire in 2025.  The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against the foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $1,539$598 and U.S.federal and state tax credits of $504$4,097 because management does not believe that it is more likely than not that net operating loss carryforwardsthe amounts will be realized prior to their expiration.realized.

Undistributed earnings of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $62,497$66,094 at September 30, 2017.2022. The Company considers most of those earnings reinvested indefinitely and, accordingly, aside from the one-time transition tax associated with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, no additional provision for U.S. income taxes has been provided. DeterminationWe note that with our foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom, Haynes International Ltd, as of September 30, 2022, we consider this subsidiary to be indefinitely reinvested except to the amount of unrecognized deferredextent there is previously tax earnings and profit (PTEP), in that case, we might decide to repatriate cash via a dividend to the U.S.  If such funds were to be repatriated, there could be minor currency gain/loss that would be subject to tax and any distribution could also be subject to applicable non-U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.and withholding taxes.

As of September 30, 2017,2022, the Company wasis open to examination in the U.S. federal income tax jurisdiction for the 20142017 through 20172021 tax years and in various foreign jurisdictions from 20122017 through 2017.2022. The Company is also open to examination in various states in the U.S., none of which were individually material.

As of September 30, 2021 and 2022, the Company had no uncertain tax positions.

Note 7.8.  Debt

U.S. revolving credit facility

TheOn October 19, 2020, the Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”)JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and related Pledge and Security Agreement with certain other lenders (the “Security Agreement”, and, together with the Credit Agreement, the “Credit Documents”).  The Credit Documents, which had a three-year term

69

expiring in October 2023, replaced the Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”)and related agreements, dated as of July 14, 2011, as amended, previously entered into between the Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC with certain other lenders with an effective date of July 14, 2011.lenders.  On July 7, 2016,August 30, 2022, the Company amended the agreementCredit Agreement to among other things, extend the term through Julymaturity of the agreement from October 19, 2023 to April 19, 2024 and switched from a LIBOR-based interest rate calculation to a SOFR-based interest rate calculation.  On October 7, 2021 and reduce unused line fees and certain administrative fees. The2022, the Company again amended the Credit Agreement to implement an accordion feature that increased the maximum revolving loanborrowing amount under the Amended Agreement is $120.0from $100.0 million to $160.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formulaand certain reserves.  

As of September 30, 2022, the Credit Agreement had a balance of $74.7 million which is classified as long-term on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  With the amendment executed on October 7, 2022, the Credit Agreement provides for revolving loans in the maximum amount of $160.0 million, subject to a borrowing base and certain reserves. The AmendedCredit Agreement has a remaining accordion which permits an increase in the maximum revolving loan amount from $120.0$160.0 million up to an aggregate amount of $170.0 million at the request of the borrower.borrower if certain conditions are met. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facilityCredit Agreement bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either Wells Fargo’sJPMorgan’s “prime rate,”rate”, plus up to 0.75%1.25% - 1.75% per annum, or the adjusted EurodollarSOFR rate used(SOFR plus 0.10%) by the lender, plus up to 2.0%2.25% - 2.75% per annum.  Asannum (with a SOFR floor of September 30, 2017, the U.S. revolving credit facility had a zero balance. In addition, the0.5%).    

The Company must pay monthly, in arrears, a commitment fee of 0.20%0.425% per annum on the unused amount of the U.S. revolving credit facility total commitment. For letters of credit, the Company must pay 1.5%a fronting fee of 0.125% per annum on the daily outstanding

64


balance of all issued letters of credit, plusas well as customary fees for issuance, amendments and processing.

The Company is subject to certain covenants such as to fixed charge coverage ratios and other customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of indebtedness, the granting of liens and the sale of assets. The covenant pertaining to fixed charge coverage ratios is only effective in the event the amount of excess availability under the revolver is less than 10.0%the greater of (i) 12.5% of the maximum credit revolving loan amount.amount and (ii) $12.5 million. The Company is permitted to pay dividends and repurchase common stock if certain financial metrics are met (which domet.  The Company may pay quarterly cash dividends up to $3.5 million per fiscal quarter so long as the Company is not apply in default under the case of regular quarterly dividends less than $20.0 million in the aggregate in a year and repurchases in connection with the vesting of shares of restricted stock).  Credit Documents.

Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facilityCredit Agreement are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the U.S. assets of the Company, including the equity interests in its U.S. subsidiaries, but excluding the four-high Steckel rolling mill and related assets, which are pledged to Titanium Metals Corporation (“TIMET”) to secure the performance of the Company’s obligations under a Conversion Services Agreement with TIMET (see discussion of TIMET at Note 15 in15).  Borrowings under the Company’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The U.S. revolving credit facility isCredit Agreement are also secured by a pledge of a 65%100% equity interest in each of the Company’s direct foreign subsidiaries.

The Company’s U.K. subsidiary (Haynes International Ltd.) has an overdraft facility of 1,7001,333 Pounds Sterling ($2,278)1,471), all of which was available on September 30, 2017.2022. The Company’s French subsidiary (Haynes International, S.A.R.L.) has an overdraft banking facility of 240 Euro ($283)234), all of which was available on September 30, 2017.2022.  The Company’s Swiss subsidiary (Haynes International AG) has an overdraft banking facility of 4001,020 Swiss Francs ($413)1,040), all of which was available on September 30, 2017.2022.

Note 8.9.  Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan (401(k)) for substantially all U.S. employees. The Company contributes an amount equal to 50% of an employee’s contribution to the plan up to a maximum contribution of 3% of the employee’s salary, except for all salaried employees and certain hourly employees (those hired after June 30, 2007 that are not eligible for the U.S. pension plan). The Company contributes an amount equal to 60% of an employee’s contribution to the plan up to a maximum contribution of 6% of the employee’s salary for these groups. Expenses associated with this plan for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 20172022 totaled $1,598, $1,652$1,950, $1,748 and $1,590,$2,016, respectively.

70

The Company sponsors certain profit sharing plans for the benefit of employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. There were no contributions to these plans for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017.2022.

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company has non-contributory defined benefit pension plans which cover mostcertain employees in the U.S. and the U.K.  

Benefits provided under the Company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plan are based on years of service and the employee’s final compensation. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute annually an amount deductible for federal income tax purposes based upon an actuarial cost method using actuarial and economic assumptions designed to achieve adequate funding of benefit obligations.  In fiscal 2021, the Company accelerated funding as part of its capital allocation strategy and continues to evaluate additional funding in future years as it strives to achieve a zero net liability.

The Company has non-qualified pensions for a few former executives of the Company. Non-qualified pension plan expense for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 20172022 was $140, $91$57, $37 and $19,$3, respectively. Accrued liabilities in the amount of $854$623 and $777$530 for these benefits are included in accrued pension and postretirement benefits liability at September 30, 20162021 and 2017,2022, respectively.

In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. SubstantiallyCertain employees, depending on date of hire, become eligible for health care, and substantially all domestic employees become eligible for these benefits,life insurance, if they reach normal retirement age while working for the Company.  The Company’s liability related to total retiree health care costs is limited to $5,000 annually.  

65


The Company made contributions of $1,500, $6,000, $21,000, and $6,000 to fund its domestic Company-sponsored pension plan for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, respectively. The Company’s U.K. subsidiary made contributions of $909, $778$517, $0 and $804$0 for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, respectively, to the U.K. pension plan.

During the fourth quarter71

The Company uses a September 30 measurement date for its plans. As of the September 30, 2022 measurement date, the Projected benefit obligation for the U.S pension plan and the U.K. pension plan was $223,871 and $7,404, respectively.  The status of employee pension benefit plans and other postretirement benefit plans is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

 

Postretirement

 

 

 

Pension Plans

 

 

Health Care Benefits

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

    

2016

    

2017

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

311,943

 

$

337,338

 

 

$

110,534

 

$

125,117

 

Service cost

 

 

4,080

 

 

6,282

 

 

 

232

 

 

350

 

Interest cost

 

 

12,050

 

 

10,577

 

 

 

4,595

 

 

4,292

 

Actuarial losses

 

 

32,370

 

 

(27,246)

 

 

 

15,283

 

 

(8,072)

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(23,105)

 

 

(14,682)

 

 

 

(5,527)

 

 

(4,263)

 

Administrative expenses

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,466)

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

337,338

 

$

310,803

 

 

$

125,117

 

$

117,424

 

Change in Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

205,498

 

$

207,963

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Actual return on assets

 

 

18,792

 

 

25,475

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Employer contributions

 

 

6,778

 

 

6,804

 

 

 

5,527

 

 

4,263

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(23,105)

 

 

(14,682)

 

 

 

(5,527)

 

 

(4,263)

 

Administrative expenses

 

 

-

 

 

(1,466)

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

207,963

 

$

224,094

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Funded Status of Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unfunded status

 

$

(129,375)

 

$

(86,709)

 

 

$

(125,117)

 

$

(117,424)

 

Defined Benefit

Postretirement

 

Pension Plans

Health Care Benefits

 

Year Ended

Year Ended

 

September 30,

September 30,

 

    

2021

    

2022

    

    

2021

    

2022

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

$

345,390

$

315,466

$

93,339

$

82,964

Service cost

 

5,795

 

4,728

 

1,095

 

1,825

Interest cost

 

7,481

 

7,936

 

2,292

 

2,234

Actuarial (gains) losses

 

(27,225)

 

(81,225)

 

(10,943)

 

(20,343)

Benefits paid

 

(14,965)

 

(15,223)

 

(2,819)

 

(2,643)

Administrative expenses

 

(1,010)

 

(407)

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

$

315,466

$

231,275

$

82,964

$

64,037

Change in Plan Assets:

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$

245,546

$

297,703

$

$

Actual return on assets

 

47,132

 

(69,752)

 

 

Employer contributions

 

21,000

 

6,000

 

2,819

 

2,643

Benefits paid

 

(14,965)

 

(15,223)

 

(2,819)

 

(2,643)

Administrative expenses

(1,010)

(407)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$

297,703

$

218,321

$

$

Funded Status of Plan:

Unfunded status

$

(17,763)

$

(12,954)

$

(82,964)

$

(64,037)

The actuarial gain incurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, for the Defined Benefit Pension Plan was driven by higher returns on pension assets than were expected and an increase in the discount rate which resulted in an increase in pension assets and a decrease in the defined benefit obligation.  The actuarial gain incurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 for the Defined Benefit Pension Plan was driven by an increase in the discount rate applied against future expected benefit payments which resulted in a decrease in the defined benefit obligation.  

66


The actuarial gain incurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 for the Postretirement Health Care Plan was primarily driven by reductions in healthcare costs incurred over the past three years. The actuarial gain incurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, for the Postretirement Health Care Plan was primarily driven by an increase in the discount rate applied against future expected health care benefit payments which resulted in a decrease in the defined benefit obligation.

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:

Defined Benefit

Postretirement

Non-Qualified

All Plans

 

Pension Plans

Health Care Benefits

Pension Plans

Combined

 

September 30,

September 30,

September 30,

September 30,

 

    

2021

    

2022

    

2021

    

2022

    

2021

    

2022

    

2021

    

2022

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits:

Current

$

$

$

(3,459)

$

(3,276)

$

(95)

$

(95)

$

(3,554)

$

(3,371)

Non-current

 

(17,763)

 

(12,954)

 

(79,505)

 

(60,761)

 

(528)

 

(435)

 

(97,796)

 

(74,150)

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

$

(17,763)

$

(12,954)

$

(82,964)

$

(64,037)

$

(623)

$

(530)

$

(101,350)

$

(77,521)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

Net income (loss)

 

19,150

 

22,496

 

(10,704)

 

(30,807)

 

 

 

8,446

 

(8,311)

Prior service cost

 

1,599

 

1,365

 

 

 

 

 

1,599

 

1,365

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

$

20,749

$

23,861

$

(10,704)

$

(30,807)

$

$

$

10,045

$

(6,946)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

Postretirement

 

Non-Qualified

 

All Plans

 

 

 

Pension Plans

 

Health Care Benefits

 

Pension Plans

 

Combined

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

2016

    

2017

    

2016

    

2017

    

2016

    

2017

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(5,000)

 

$

(5,000)

 

$

(95)

 

$

(95)

 

$

(5,095)

 

$

(5,095)

 

Non-current

 

 

(129,375)

 

 

(86,709)

 

 

(120,117)

 

 

(112,424)

 

 

(759)

 

 

(682)

 

 

(250,251)

 

 

(199,815)

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 

$

(129,375)

 

$

(86,709)

 

$

(125,117)

 

$

(117,424)

 

$

(854)

 

$

(777)

 

$

(255,346)

 

$

(204,910)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

116,388

 

 

66,819

 

 

47,636

 

 

35,286

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

164,024

 

 

102,105

 

Prior service cost

 

 

3,020

 

 

2,213

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,020

 

 

2,213

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$

119,408

 

$

69,032

 

$

47,636

 

$

35,286

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

167,044

 

$

104,318

 

Amounts expected to be recognized from AOCI into the statement of operations in the following year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of net loss

 

$

11,268

 

$

4,910

 

$

4,278

 

$

2,999

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

15,546

 

$

7,909

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

808

 

 

374

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

808

 

 

374

 

 

 

$

12,076

 

$

5,284

 

$

4,278

 

$

2,999

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

16,354

 

$

8,283

 

72

The non-current portion of the defined benefit pension plan portion of accrued pension and postretirement benefits amounts to $86,709$17,763 and $12,954 in fiscal 2017.  This amount comprises2021 and 2022, respectively.  These amounts include the UK pension plan net pension asset of $3,566$8,372 and $7,702, respectively, which is included in Other assets on the consolidated balance sheetsheets as well as the US pension plan accrued pension liability of $90,275$26,135 and $20,655, respectively, which isare recorded in accrued pension benefit (less current portion) on the consolidated balance sheet.  

The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $317,754$308,284 and $299,197$227,915 at September 30, 20162021 and 2017,2022, respectively.

The cost of the Company’s postretirement benefits is accrued over the years that employees provide service to the date of their full eligibility for such benefits. The Company’s policy is to fund the cost of claims on an annual basis.

The components of net periodic pension cost and postretirement health care benefit cost are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Service cost

 

$

3,898

 

$

4,080

 

$

6,282

 

Interest cost

 

 

11,203

 

 

12,050

 

 

10,577

 

Expected return on assets

 

 

(15,117)

 

 

(14,380)

 

 

(14,419)

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

808

 

 

808

 

 

808

 

Recognized actuarial loss

 

 

4,645

 

 

8,838

 

 

11,267

 

Net periodic cost

 

$

5,437

 

$

11,396

 

$

14,515

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement

 

 

Health Care Benefits

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Service cost

 

$

337

 

$

232

 

$

350

 

$

5,546

$

5,628

$

4,728

Interest cost

 

 

4,385

 

 

4,595

 

 

4,292

 

 

8,866

7,481

7,936

Expected return on assets

 

(15,061)

(16,356)

(14,818)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

228

239

233

Recognized actuarial loss

 

 

2,433

 

 

2,825

 

 

4,278

 

 

7,288

7,721

Net periodic cost

 

$

7,155

 

$

7,652

 

$

8,920

 

$

6,867

$

4,713

$

(1,921)

Postretirement

 

Health Care Benefits

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Service cost

$

1,416

$

1,095

$

1,825

Interest cost

 

3,493

2,292

2,234

Recognized actuarial loss

 

1,848

(240)

Net periodic cost

$

6,757

$

3,387

$

3,819

67


Assumptions

Assumptions

A 5.0% (5.0%-2016) annual rate of increase for the costs of covered health care benefits for ages under 65 and a 5.0% (5.0%-2016) annual rate of increase for ages over 65 were assumed for 20172021 and remained at 5.0%2022 and increased to 7.0% for the under 65 and over 65 age groups in 2023, 6.5% in 2024, 6.0% in 2025, 5.5% in 2026 and 5.0% in the years thereafter. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have no effect on the total

73

The actuarial present value of the projected pension benefit obligation and postretirement health care benefit obligation for the plans at September 30, 20162021 and 20172022 were determined based on the following assumptions:

    

September 30,

    

September 30,

 

2021

2022

 

Discount rate (postretirement health care)(1)

 

2.75

%  

5.13

%  

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)(1)

 

2.63

%  

5.13

%  

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

 

2.00

%  

5.90

%  

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

 

2.50

%  

2.50

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30,

    

September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

Discount rate (postretirement health care)

 

3.50

%  

3.75

%  

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)

 

3.25

%  

3.63

%  

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

 

2.30

%  

2.50

%  

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

 

3.50

%  

2.50

%  

(1)The discount rate for the Postretirement health care plan and the U.S. pension plan are derived using the FTSE Pension Discount Curve and projected benefit payments.

Defined Benefit

 

Pension and

 

Postretirement Health

 

Care Plans

 

Year Ended

 

September 30,

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Discount rate (postretirement health care plan)

 

3.13

%  

2.50

%  

2.75

%  

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)

 

2.88

%  

2.25

%  

2.63

%  

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

 

1.70

%  

1.50

%  

2.00

%  

Expected return on plan assets (U.S. pension plan)

 

7.25

%  

7.25

%  

5.25

%  

Expected return on plan assets (U.K. pension plan)

 

2.20

%  

2.00

%  

3.00

%  

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

 

2.50

%  

2.50

%  

2.50

%  

The net periodic pension and postretirement health care benefit costs for the plans were determined using the following assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

 

 

Pension and

 

 

 

Postretirement Health

 

 

 

Care Plans

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Discount rate (postretirement health care plan)

 

4.25

%  

4.25

%  

3.50

%  

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)

 

4.00

%  

4.00

%  

3.25

%  

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

 

3.90

%  

3.70

%  

2.30

%  

Expected return on plan assets (U.S. pension plan)

 

7.50

%  

7.50

%  

7.50

%  

Expected return on plan assets (U.K. pension plan)

 

4.40

%  

4.10

%  

2.70

%  

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

 

3.50

%  

3.50

%  

3.50

%  

Plan Assets and Investment Strategy

The Company’s pension plan assets by level within the fair value hierarchy at September 30, 20162021 and 2017,2022, are presented in the table below. The pension plan assets were accounted for at fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Investments in U.S and International equities, and Fixed Income are held in mutual funds and common / collective funds which are valued using net asset value (NAV) provided by the administrator of the fund.fund, and individual fixed income securities which consists of Level 1 and Level 2 assets.   As of September 30, 2022, the fixed income portfolio

74

consisted of 305 issuances of fixed income securities from 251 issuers.  For more information on a description of the fair value hierarchy, see Note 16.  The Company adopted the guidance included in ASU 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset

September 30, 2021

 

    

Level 1

    

    

    

 

Active

Level 2

 

Markets for

Other

 

Identical

Observable

 

Assets

Inputs

NAV

Total

 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

U.S. corporate and government bonds

$

23,654

$

169,953

$

$

193,607

U.S. common stock mutual funds

 

$

$

44,743

 

44,743

Common /collective funds

U.S. common stock

 

 

 

19,672

 

19,672

International equity

 

 

 

16,245

 

16,245

Total U.S.

$

23,654

$

169,953

$

80,660

$

274,267

U.K. Plan Assets:

Equities

$

$

$

8,202

$

8,202

Bonds

 

 

 

12,890

 

12,890

Other

 

 

 

2,344

 

2,344

Total U.K.

$

$

$

23,436

$

23,436

Total pension plan assets

$

23,654

$

169,953

$

104,096

$

297,703

68


September 30, 2022

 

    

Level 1

    

    

    

 

Active

Level 2

 

Markets for

Other

 

Identical

Observable

 

Assets

Inputs

NAV

Total

 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

U.S. corporate and government bonds

$

15,926

$

158,582

$

$

174,508

U.S. common stock mutual funds

16,471

16,471

Common /collective funds

Bonds

 

 

 

 

Short-term money market

 

 

 

 

U.S. common stock

 

 

 

6,847

 

6,847

International equity

 

 

 

5,390

 

5,390

Total U.S.

$

15,926

$

158,582

$

28,708

$

203,216

U.K. Plan Assets:

Equities

$

$

$

5,135

$

5,135

Bonds

 

 

 

8,006

 

8,006

Other

 

 

 

1,964

 

1,964

Total U.K.

$

$

$

15,105

$

15,105

Total pension plan assets

$

15,926

$

158,582

$

43,813

$

218,321

Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) which requires entities to remove investments in which fair value is measured using net asset value from the fair value hierarchy table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

    

Level 1

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Active

 

Level 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Inputs

 

NAV

 

Total

 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. common stock mutual funds

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

64,333

 

$

64,333

 

Common /collective funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

75,686

 

 

75,686

 

U.S. common stock

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

39,735

 

 

39,735

 

International equity

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,461

 

 

9,461

 

Total U.S.

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

189,215

 

$

189,215

 

U.K. Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

7,499

 

$

7,499

 

Bonds

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,187

 

 

9,187

 

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,062

 

 

2,062

 

Total U.K.

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

18,748

 

$

18,748

 

Total pension plan assets

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

207,963

 

$

207,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2017

 

 

    

Level 1

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Active

 

Level 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Inputs

 

NAV

 

Total

 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. common stock mutual funds

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

73,430

 

$

73,430

 

Common /collective funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

81,702

 

 

81,702

 

U.S. common stock

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

32,784

 

 

32,784

 

International equity

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

16,341

 

 

16,341

 

Total U.S.

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

204,257

 

$

204,257

 

U.K. Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

8,913

 

$

8,913

 

Bonds

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,750

 

 

7,750

 

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,174

 

 

3,174

 

Total U.K.

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

19,837

 

$

19,837

 

Total pension plan assets

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

224,094

 

$

224,094

 

The primary financial objectives of the plans are to minimize cash contributions overmaintain asset funding as a percentage of the long termbenefit obligations.  The U.S. Pension Plan utilized a customized liability driven investment (LDI) strategy which is designed to match the risk and preserve capital while maintaining a high degreeduration of liquidity. A secondary financial objective is, where possible, to avoid significant downside riskthe fixed income assets in the short run. The objective is based on a long-term investment horizon soportfolio with that interim fluctuations should be viewed with appropriate perspective.of the obligation.  

It is the policy of the U.S. pension plan to invest assets with an allocation to equities as shown below.below based on a matrix which determines the allocation between equities and fixed income based on the funding percentage of the plan. The balance of the assets is maintained in fixed income investments, and in cash holdings, to the extent permitted by the plan documents.

6975


AssetTarget asset classes as a percent of total assets:assets as of September 30, 2022:

Asset Class

Target(1)

Equity

 

6014

%  

Fixed Income

 

4086

%  

Real Estate and Other

 

%  


(1)

(1)

From time to time theThe Company may adjustadjusts the target allocation by an amount not to exceed 10%.

based on the fair value of pension assets as a percentage of the projected pension obligation.  

In determiningchoosing the assumption for the expected long-term rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets, the Company takes into account the plan’s target plan’sasset allocation at September 30, 2017 of 60% equities and 40% fixed income.as well as capital market assumptions relating to the asset classes. The Company assumes an approximately 3.00%believes that its assumption the long-term rate of return on plan assets is reasonable, and comparable to 4.00% equity risk premium above the broad bond market yieldsasset return assumptions of 5.00% to 7.00%.other companies, given the target allocation of the plan assets. Note that over very long historical periods, the realized risk premium has been higher. The Company believes that its assumption of a 7.5% long-term rate of return on plan assets is comparable to other companies, givenhas met or exceeded the target allocationexpected rate of return. Also note that in recognition of the plan assets; however,variability of future market returns, it is reasonable to consider a modest range around the expected future return, and there exists the potential for the use of a lower, rateor higher, expected rates of return in the future.

The U.K. pension plan assets follow a more conservative investment objective due to the higher funding status of the plan.

Contributions and Benefit Payments

The Company has not yet determined the amounts to contribute to its domestic pension plans, domestic other postretirement benefit plans and the U.K. pension plan in fiscal 2018.2023.

Pension and postretirement health care benefits, which include expected future service, are expected to be paid out of the respective plans as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Postretirement

 

Fiscal Year Ending September 30

 

Pension

 

Health Care

 

2018

 

$

15,358

 

$

5,000

 

2019

 

 

15,649

 

 

5,000

 

2020

 

 

16,161

 

 

5,000

 

2021

 

 

16,564

 

 

5,000

 

2022

 

 

17,120

 

 

5,000

 

2023 - 2027 (in total)

 

 

90,470

 

 

25,000

 

    

    

Postretirement

 

Fiscal Year Ending September 30

Pension

Health Care

 

2023

$

15,738

$

4,828

2024

 

16,081

 

4,841

2025

 

16,366

 

4,890

2026

 

16,573

 

5,068

2027

 

16,802

 

5,007

2028 - 2032 (in total)

 

83,895

 

25,956

Note 9.  Commitments

The Company leases certain transportation vehicles, warehouse facilities, office space and machinery and equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable leases, most of which expire within 10 years and may be renewed by the Company. Rent expense under such arrangements totaled $3,403, $3,726 and $4,082 for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Rent expense does not include income from sub-lease rentals totaling $105, $120 and $153 for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at September 30, 2017, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Operating

 

2018

 

$

2,978

 

2019

 

 

1,859

 

2020

 

 

1,243

 

2021

 

 

232

 

2022

 

 

100

 

2023 and thereafter

 

 

 —

 

 

 

$

6,412

 

70


Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases have not been reduced by minimum sub-lease rentals of $79 due in the future.

Note 10.  Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies

Legal

The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations, including environmental, commercial, asbestos, employment and federal and/or state Equal Employment Opportunity Commission administrative actions. Future expenditures for environmental, employment, intellectual property and other legal matters cannot be determined with any degree of certainty; however, based on the facts presently known, management does not believe that such costs will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.certainty.

The Company is currently, and has in the past been, subject to claims involving personal injuries allegedly relating to its products and processes. For example, the Company is presently involved in two actions involving welding rod-related injuries, which were filed in California state court against numerous manufacturers, including the Company, in May 2006 and February 2007, respectively, alleging that the welding-related products of the defendant manufacturers harmed the users of such products through the inhalation of welding fumes containing manganese. The Company (together with a number of other manufacturer defendants) is also involved in one action alleging that asbestos in its facilities harmed the plaintiffs. The Company believes that it has defenses to these allegations and that, if the Company were to be found liable, the cases would not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company expects to amend its Amended and Restated By-Laws effective upon receipt of the affirmative vote of a majority of its stockholders at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  The proposed amendment would remove the requirement that stockholders electing to remove a director must show cause in order to do so. This proposed amendment is in response to a recent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery

Environmental

The Company has received permits from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources to close and provide post‑closurepost-closure environmental monitoring and care for certain areas of its Kokomo, Indiana and Mountain Home, North Carolina facilities, respectively.  

76

The Company is required to, among other things, monitor groundwater and to continue post‑closurepost-closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, the Company is aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater, and additional testing and corrective action by the Company could be required.  The Company is unable to estimate the costs of any further corrective action at these sites, if required. Accordingly, the Company cannot assure that the costs of any future corrective action at these or any other current or former sites would not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

As of September 30, 2017,2022, the Company has accrued $633$407 for post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities, of which $531$341 is included in long-term obligations as it is not due within one year.  Accruals for these costs are calculated by estimating the cost to monitor and maintain each post-closure site and multiplying that amount by the number of years remaining in the post-closure monitoring.

71


Expected maturities of post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities (discounted) included in long-term obligations are as follows at September 30, 2017.2022.  

 

 

 

 

2019

$

54

 

2020

 

52

 

2021

 

60

 

2022

 

50

 

2023 and thereafter

 

315

 

 

$

531

 

Expected maturities of post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities (discounted)

    

 

Year Ending September 30,

2024

$

82

2025

 

60

2026

 

58

2027

62

2028 and thereafter

 

79

$

341

Note 11.  Stockholder’s Equity

Dividends

During fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022, the Company paid dividends of $11,058, $11,175 and $11,072, respectively.

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock activity for fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022 are as follows:

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

September 30,

September 30,

September 30,

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

Number of shares at beginning of year

53,469

58,909

195,638

Repurchases of common stock to satisfy employee payroll taxes

5,440

23,751

37,002

Repurchases of common stock from share repurchase plan

112,978

142,392

Number of shares at end of year

58,909

195,638

375,032

Share Repurchase Plan

On February 11, 2016,July 28, 2021, the Board of Directors authorized the use of up to $20 million of available cash to purchase shares of the Company's common stock through July 27, 2022.  The Board adopted the repurchase plan because it believed that repurchasing the Company’s stock at current market prices presented an attractive capital allocation strategy for the Company voluntarily reportedgiven the available options for the use of capital.  The authorization of the repurchase plan has expired and no new authorization has been put in place.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021, the Company repurchased 112,978 shares at an average price per share of $37.57 with an aggregate purchase price of $4,245 under the 10b5-1 agreement and in the first quarter of fiscal 2022, the

77

Company repurchased 142,392 shares at an average price per share of $40.09 with an aggregate purchase price of $5,709 under the 10b5-1 agreement.  

In addition to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality a leak that it discovered in one of its chemical cleaning operations at its Arcadia, Louisiana facility.  As a result of the discovery,above-mentioned share repurchase plan, the Company is workingrepurchased 37,002 shares in fiscal 2022 with that departmentan aggregate purchase price of $1,534 in order to determine the extent of the issue and appropriate remediation.satisfy payroll taxes related to employee stock-based compensation plans.

Note 11.12.  Stock-based Compensation

Restricted Stock Plan

On February 23, 2009, the Company adopted a restricted stock plan that reserved 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance.   Additionally, on March 1, 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan which provides for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares, among other rewards.awards.  Up to 275,000 shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares may be granted in the aggregate under this plan.  Coinciding withFollowing the adoption of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan, the Company is no longerceased granting awards from the 2009 restricted stock plan, although awards remain outstanding thereunder.  On January 24, 2020, the Company adopted the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan which provides for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares, among other awards.  Up to 250,000 shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares were authorized to be granted in the aggregate under this plan which was subsequently amended on February 25, 2022 to allow for an aggregate of 575,000 authorized shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares to be granted.  Following the adoption of the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, the Company ceased granting awards from the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan, although awards remain outstanding thereunder.

Grants of restricted stock may beare comprised of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to transfer restrictions, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may set vesting requirements based on the achievement of specific performance goals or the passage of time.

Employees earn and receive dividends from the restricted stock during this vesting period.  

Restricted shares are subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates prior to the vesting date or if any applicable performance goals are not met. The Company will assess, on an ongoing basis, the probability of whether relevantthe performance criteria will be achieved. The Company will recognize compensation expense over the performance period if it is deemed probable that the goals will be achieved. The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock is determined based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, which is determined based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading dateday immediately preceding the grant date. The plan providesCompany’s plans provide for the adjustment of the number of shares covered by an outstanding grant and the maximum number of shares for which restricted stock may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event.

The shares of time-based restricted stock granted to employees will vest on the third anniversary of their grant date if the recipient is still an employee of the Company on such date.  The shares of restricted stock granted to non-employee directors will vest on the earlier of (a) the first anniversary of the date of grant or (b) the failure of such non-employee director to be re-elected at an annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company as a result of such non-employee director being excluded from the nominations for any reason other than cause.

7278


The following table summarizes the activity under the 20092016 restricted stock plan and the 20162020 Incentive Compensation Plan with respect to restricted stock for the year ended September 30, 2017:2022:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average Fair

 

 

 

Number of

 

Value At

 

 

 

Shares

 

Grant Date

 

Unvested at September 30, 2016

 

121,010

 

$

44.51

 

Granted

 

37,275

 

$

40.86

 

Forfeited / Canceled

 

(12,650)

 

$

52.32

 

Vested

 

(38,425)

 

$

47.20

 

Unvested at September 30, 2017

 

107,210

 

$

41.36

 

Expected to vest

 

80,293

 

$

40.98

 

    

    

Weighted

 

Average Fair

 

Number of

Value At

 

Shares

Grant Date

 

Unvested at September 30, 2021

 

142,269

$

26.78

Granted

 

32,204

$

43.98

Forfeited / Canceled

 

(6,522)

$

28.79

Vested

 

(71,415)

$

25.63

Unvested at September 30, 2022

 

96,536

$

33.23

Expected to vest

 

96,536

$

33.23

Compensation expense related to restricted stock for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 20172022 was $1,650, $1,466,$1,160, $2,024, and $1,340,$1,474, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock at September 30, 20172022 was $1,266,$1,239, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.620.99 years. During fiscal 2017,2022, the Company repurchased 6,01725,386 shares of stock from employees at an average purchase price of $44.15$40.78 to satisfy required withholding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock-based compensation.

Performance Shares

Deferred Restricted Stock

On November 22,20, 2017, the Company adopted a deferred compensation plan that allows directors and officers the option to defer receipt of cash and stock compensation.  Beginning in fiscal 2018, the Company has granted shares of restricted stock from the 2016 and 2020 Incentive Compensation Plans with respect to which elections have been made by certain individuals to defer receipt to a future period.  Such shares vest in accordance with the parameters of the 2016 and 2020 Incentive Compensation Plans, however, receipt of the shares and any corresponding dividends are deferred until the end of the deferral period.  In the event the deferred shares are forfeited prior to the vesting date, deferred dividends pertaining to those shares will also be forfeited.  During the deferral period, the participants who elected to defer shares will not have voting rights with respect to those shares.  

The following table summarizes the activity under the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan with respect to deferred restricted stock for the year ended September 30, 2022.  

    

    

Weighted

 

Average Fair

 

Number of

Value At

 

Shares

Grant Date

 

Unvested and deferred at September 30, 2021

 

7,398

$

22.64

Granted

 

3,801

$

44.07

Vested and deferred

(7,398)

$

22.64

Unvested and deferred at September 30, 2022

 

3,801

$

44.07

Vested and deferred at September 30, 2022

 

20,050

$

29.23

Compensation expense related to deferred restricted stock for the year ended September 30, 2020, 2021 and 2022 was $271, $188 and $168, respectively.  The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock at September 30, 2022 was $28, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.17 years.

Performance Shares

In November 2019, the Company granted a target of 19,000 performance share awards to certain key employees.employees, target numbers of performance shares under the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan.  The number of performance shares that will ultimately be earned, as well as the number of shares that will be distributed in settling those earned performance shares, if any, will not be determined until the end of the performance period.   Performance shares earned will depend on the calculated total shareholder return of

79

the Company at the end of the three-year period ending September 30, 2019,commencing from the beginning of the fiscal year in which the award was granted as compared to the total shareholder return of the Company’s peer group, as defined by the Compensation Committee.Committee for this purpose.  The fair value of the performance shares is $60.09 per share, which is estimated as of the date of the grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model.  

The following table summarizes the activity under the 2016 and 2020 Incentive Compensation Plans with respect to performance shares for the twelve months ended September 30, 2022.  

    

    

Weighted

 

Average Fair

 

Number of

Value At

 

Shares

Grant Date

 

Unvested at September 30, 2021

 

87,193

$

37.24

Granted

 

21,520

$

61.04

Vested

(24,121)

$

43.42

Forfeited / Canceled

(8,172)

$

42.97

Unvested at September 30, 2022

 

76,420

$

41.37

Compensation expense related to the performance shares for the yearyears ended September 30, 20172020, 2021 and 2022 was $336. No performance share awards were outstanding prior to the year ended September 30, 2017.$849, $1,082 and $1,021, respectively.  The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to performance shares at September 30, 20172022 was $806,$1,242, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.001.54 years.

Stock Option Plans

The Company’s 20162020 Incentive Compensation Plan and its two previous stock option plans authorize, or formerly authorized, the granting of non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation rights to certain key employees and non-employee directors for the purchase of a maximum of 1,925,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The first option planFor the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, the maximum number of shares granted subject to options is 350,000 which was adoptedsubsequently amended on February 25, 2022 to allow for a maximum number of shares granted subject to options in August 2004 and provided for the grantamount of options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a second option plan that provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  Coinciding with400,000.  Following the adoption of the 20162020 Incentive Compensation Plan, the Company is no longerceased granting awards from these plans,its previous stock option plan, although awards remain outstanding thereunder.  On March 1, 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan which provides for grants of up to 425,000 stock options and stock appreciation rights.from previous plans.  Each plan provides for the adjustment of the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, options are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant and vest 331/3% per year over three years from the grant date.   The amount of compensation cost recognized in the financial statements is measured based upon the grant date fair value.

The fair value of option grants is estimated as of the date of the grant.The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rates and dividend yields. The volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected term of the stock option granted. The Company uses historical volatility because management believes such volatility is representative of prospective trends. The expected term of an

73


award is based on historical exercise data. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the awards.  The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectations regarding dividend payouts at the time of the grant. The following assumptions were used for grants in the first quarter ofduring fiscal 2017:2020, 2021 and 2022:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Fair

    

Dividend

    

Risk-free

    

Expected

    

Expected

 

Grant Date

 

Value

 

Yield

 

Interest Rate

 

Volatility

 

Life

 

November 22, 2016

 

$

11.50

 

2.15

%  

1.79

%  

37

%  

 5

years

 

November 24, 2015

 

$

8.37

 

2.33

%  

1.70

%  

30

%  

 5

years

 

November 25, 2014

 

$

8.17

 

1.90

%  

0.96

%  

28

%  

 3

years

 

    

Fair

    

Dividend

    

Risk-free

    

Expected

    

Expected

 

Grant Date

Value

Yield

Interest Rate

Volatility

Life

 

November 23, 2021

$

15.02

 

2.00

%  

1.22

%  

45

%  

5

years

November 24, 2020

$

5.91

 

3.89

%  

0.39

%  

43

%  

5

years

November 19, 2019

$

9.66

 

2.38

%  

1.65

%  

35

%  

5

years

The stock-based employee compensation expense for stock options for the years ended September 30, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 20172022 was $534, $514$1,038, $1,180 and $433,$937, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 20172022 was $827,$717, to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.981.03 years.

80

The following table summarizes the activity under the stock option plans for the year ended September 30, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

 

 

Number of

 

Value

 

Exercise

 

Contractual

 

 

 

Shares

 

(000s)

 

Prices

 

Life

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2016

 

428,401

 

 

 

 

$

48.47

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

47,925

 

 

 

 

$

40.86

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 —

 

 

 

 

$

0.00

 

 

 

 

Canceled

 

(51,000)

 

 

 

 

$

70.89

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2017

 

425,326

 

$

242

 

$

44.93

 

5.60

yrs.

 

Vested or expected to vest

 

391,469

 

$

242

 

$

44.94

 

5.49

yrs.

 

Exercisable at September 30, 2017

 

297,167

 

$

242

 

$

46.70

 

4.42

yrs.

 

2022:

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  The objective of this update was to simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.  As permitted, the Company early adopted this standard prospectively for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016.  Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

    

    

    

    

Weighted

 

Aggregate

Weighted

Average

 

Intrinsic

Average

Remaining

 

Number of

Value

Exercise

Contractual

 

Shares

(000s)

Prices

Life

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2021

 

702,576

$

34.68

Granted

 

42,080

$

44.07

Exercised

 

(14,558)

$

36.83

Forfeited/Canceled

 

(32,878)

$

44.36

Outstanding at September 30, 2022

 

697,220

$

2,281

$

34.75

 

6.17

yrs.

Vested or expected to vest

 

669,846

$

2,101

$

34.92

 

6.10

yrs.

Exercisable at September 30, 2022

 

534,296

$

1,103

$

36.07

 

5.55

yrs.

Note 12.  Quarterly Data (unaudited)

The unaudited quarterly results of operations of the Company for years ended September 30, 2016 and 2017 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 

$

95,070

 

$

102,511

 

$

101,255

 

$

107,523

Gross profit

 

 

12,088

 

 

8,905

 

 

13,265

 

 

13,322

Net income (loss)

 

 

228

 

 

(1,162)

 

 

2,792

 

 

3,162

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

$ 0.02

 

 

$ (0.09)

 

 

$ 0.22

 

 

$ 0.25

Diluted

 

 

$ 0.02

 

 

$ (0.09)

 

 

$ 0.22

 

 

$ 0.25

74


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 

$

93,355

 

$

103,112

 

$

97,977

 

$

100,765

Gross profit

 

 

10,487

 

 

9,788

 

 

3,662

 

 

5,773

Net income (loss)

 

 

(672)

 

 

(1,890)

 

 

(3,967)

 

 

(3,661)

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

$ (0.06)

 

 

$ (0.15)

 

 

$ (0.32)

 

 

$ (0.30)

Diluted

 

 

$ (0.06)

 

 

$ (0.15)

 

 

$ (0.32)

 

 

$ (0.30)

Note 13.  Segment Reporting

The Company operates in one business segment: the design, manufacture, marketing and distribution of technologically advanced, high-performance alloys for use in the aerospace, industrial gas turbine, chemical processing and other industries. The Company has operations in the United States, Europe and Asia,China, which are summarized below. Sales between geographic areas are made at negotiated selling prices. Revenues from external customers are attributed to the geographic areas presented based on the destination of product shipments.

Year Ended September 30,

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

 

Net Revenue by Geography:

United States

$

230,764

$

179,127

$

278,473

Europe

 

91,480

 

85,555

 

116,599

China

 

17,398

 

30,668

 

33,910

Other

 

40,888

 

42,311

 

61,479

Net Revenues

$

380,530

$

337,661

$

490,461

Net Revenue by Product Group:

High-temperature resistant alloys

$

308,229

$

253,246

$

387,464

Corrosive-resistant alloys

 

72,301

 

84,415

 

102,997

Net revenues

$

380,530

$

337,661

$

490,461

September 30,

 

    

2021

    

2022

 

Long-lived Assets by Geography

United States

$

140,263

$

135,698

Europe

 

6,834

 

6,921

China

 

151

 

153

Total long-lived assets

$

147,248

$

142,772

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Net Revenue by Geography:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

287,722

 

$

233,612

 

$

235,500

 

Europe

 

 

110,659

 

 

101,853

 

 

98,096

 

China

 

 

28,140

 

 

13,808

 

 

18,997

 

Other

 

 

61,114

 

 

57,086

 

 

42,616

 

Net Revenues

 

$

487,635

 

$

406,359

 

$

395,209

 

Net Revenue by Product Group:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High-temperature resistant alloys

 

$

370,603

 

$

329,151

 

$

320,119

 

Corrosive-resistant alloys

 

 

117,032

 

 

77,208

 

 

75,090

 

Net revenues

 

$

487,635

 

$

406,359

 

$

395,209

 

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

Long-lived Assets by Geography:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

191,915

 

$

185,413

 

Europe

 

 

6,935

 

 

6,879

 

China

 

 

332

 

 

264

 

Total long-lived assets

 

$

199,182

 

$

192,556

 

Note 14.  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

    

Balance at

    

Charges

    

    

Balance at

 

Beginning

(credits) to

End of

 

of Period

Expense

Deductions(1)

Period

 

Allowance for credit losses:

September 30, 2020

 

441

 

139

(35)

 

545

September 30, 2021

 

545

 

74

(66)

 

553

September 30, 2022

 

553

 

171

(296)

 

428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Balance at

    

Charges

    

 

    

Balance at

 

 

 

Beginning

 

(credits) to

 

 

 

End of

 

 

 

of Period

 

Expense

 

Deductions(1)

 

Period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2017

 

402

 

228

 

(10)

 

620

 

September 30, 2016

 

869

 

(156)

 

(311)

 

402

 

September 30, 2015

 

861

 

317

 

(309)

 

869

 


(1)

(1)

Uncollectible accounts written off net of recoveries.

75


Note 15.  Deferred Revenue

On November 17, 2006, the Company entered into a twenty-year agreement to provide conversion services to Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET) for up to ten million pounds of titanium metal annually. TIMET paid the Company a $50,000 up-front fee and will also pay the Company for its processing services during the term of the agreement (20 years)(20 years) at prices established by the terms of the agreement. TIMET may exercise an option to have ten million additional pounds of titanium converted annually, provided that it offers to loan up to $12,000 to the Company for certain capital expenditures which may be required to expand capacity. In addition to the volume commitment, the Company has granted TIMET a first priority security interest in its four-high Steckel rolling mill, along with rights of access if the Company enters into bankruptcy or defaults on any financing arrangements. The Company has agreed not to manufacture titanium products (other than cold reduced titanium tubing). The Company has also agreed not to provide titanium hot-rolling conversion services to any entity other than TIMET for the term of the Conversion Services Agreement. The agreement contains certain default provisions which could result in contract termination and damages, including liquidated damages of $25.0 million$25,000 and the Company being required to return the unearned portion of the up-front fee. The Company considered each provision and the likelihood of the occurrence of a default that would result in liquidated damages. Based on the nature of the events that could trigger the liquidated damages clause, and the availability of the cure periods set forth in the agreement, the Company determined and continues to believe that none of these circumstances are reasonably likely to occur. Therefore, events resulting in liquidated damages have not been factored in as a reduction to the amount of revenue recognized over the life of the contract. The cash received of $50,000 is recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the 20-year term of the agreement. If an event of default occurred and was not cured within any applicable grace period, the Company would recognize the impact of the liquidated damages in the period of default and re-evaluate revenue recognition under the contract for future periods. The portion of the up-front fee not recognized in income is shown as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet.Consolidated Balance Sheet.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had deferred revenue of $4,988 related to the receipt of advance payments from customers which was recorded as revenue in fiscal 2017 upon shipment.

Note 16.  Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value:

·

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

·

Level 2—Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and

·

Level 3—Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

When available, the Company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure fair value. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally-developed models that use, where possible, current market-based or independently-sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates. Items valued using internally-generated

82

models are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation.  The valuation model used depends on the specific asset or liability being valued.

Fixed income securities are held as individual bonds and are valued as either level 1 assets as they are quoted in active markets or level 2 assets.  U.S and International equities, Fixed Income, and Other Investments held in the Company’s pension plan are held as individual bonds or in mutual funds and common / collective funds which are valued using net asset value (NAV) provided by the administrator of the fund.  The NAV is based on the value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, and then divided by the number of shares outstanding.  These investments are not classified in the fair value hierarchy in accordance with guidance included in ASU 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).

76


The fair value of Cash and Cash Equivalents is determined using Level 1 information.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 20162021 and 2017:2022:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016 Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

at Reporting Date Using:

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

NAV

    

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension plan assets

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

207,963

 

$

207,963

 

Total fair value

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

207,963

 

$

207,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2017 Fair Value Measurements

 

 

at Reporting Date Using:

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

NAV

    

Total

 

September 30, 2021 Fair Value Measurements

 

at Reporting Date Using:

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

NAV

    

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension plan assets

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

224,094

 

$

224,094

 

$

23,654

$

169,953

$

$

104,096

$

297,703

Total fair value

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

224,094

 

$

224,094

 

$

23,654

$

169,953

$

$

104,096

$

297,703

September 30, 2022 Fair Value Measurements

 

at Reporting Date Using:

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

NAV

    

Total

 

Assets:

Pension plan assets

$

15,926

$

158,582

$

$

43,813

$

218,321

Total fair value

$

15,926

$

158,582

$

$

43,813

$

218,321

The Company had no Level 2 or Level 3other financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 20162021 or 2017.2022.

83

Note 17. Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component

Comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in equity that result from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) items, including pension and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax when applicable.

77


Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

    

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

    

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

30,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

5,020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(10,190)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain (loss) arising during period

 

$

(26,515)

 

$

9,595

 

 

(16,920)

 

 

$

(18,299)

 

$

6,609

 

 

(11,690)

 

 

$

46,401

 

$

(17,095)

 

 

29,306

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

(808)

 

 

298

 

 

(510)

 

 

 

(808)

 

 

299

 

 

(509)

 

 

 

808

 

 

(298)

 

 

510

 

Amortization of (gain) loss

 

 

(7,160)

 

 

2,632

 

 

(4,528)

 

 

 

(11,663)

 

 

4,293

 

 

(7,370)

 

 

 

15,517

 

 

(5,709)

 

 

9,808

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

 

(7,001)

 

 

 —

 

 

(7,001)

 

 

 

2,205

 

 

 —

 

 

2,205

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(38,650)

 

$

12,525

 

 

(26,125)

 

 

$

(37,771)

 

$

11,201

 

 

(26,570)

 

 

$

64,931

 

$

(23,102)

 

 

41,829

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,361

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(21,550)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

31,639

 

Year Ended September 30,

2020

2021

2022

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

    

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

    

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

Net income (loss)

$

(6,478)

$

(8,683)

$

45,087

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Pension and postretirement:

Net gain (loss) arising during period

$

11,121

(2,381)

 

8,740

$

68,941

(16,044)

 

52,897

$

16,991

(3,924)

 

13,067

Amortization of prior service cost

 

228

(58)

 

170

 

228

(52)

 

176

 

239

(56)

 

183

Amortization of (gain) loss

 

9,129

(2,409)

 

6,720

 

7,735

(1,802)

 

5,933

 

(240)

56

 

(184)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

3,690

 

 

3,690

 

3,254

 

 

3,254

 

(11,817)

 

 

(11,817)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

$

24,168

$

(4,848)

 

19,320

$

80,158

$

(17,898)

 

62,260

$

5,173

$

(3,924)

 

1,249

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

12,842

$

53,577

$

46,336

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Year Ended September 30, 2021

    

Pension

    

Postretirement

    

Foreign

    

Plan

Plan

Exchange

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2020

$

(65,393)

$

613

$

(9,821)

$

(74,601)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

44,493

 

8,404

 

3,254

 

56,151

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items (1)

228

228

Actuarial losses (1)

7,735

7,735

Tax benefit

(1,854)

(1,854)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

50,602

 

8,404

 

3,254

 

62,260

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2021

$

(14,791)

$

9,017

$

(6,567)

$

(12,341)

Year Ended September 30, 2022

    

Pension

    

Postretirement

    

Foreign

    

Plan

Plan

Exchange

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2021

$

(14,791)

$

9,017

$

(6,567)

$

(12,341)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

(2,557)

 

15,624

 

(11,817)

 

1,250

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items (1)

239

239

Actuarial losses (1)

(240)

(240)

Tax benefit

(56)

56

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(2,374)

 

15,440

 

(11,817)

 

1,249

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2022

$

(17,165)

$

24,457

$

(18,384)

$

(11,092)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 2016

 

    

Pension

    

Postretirement

    

Foreign

    

 

 

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Exchange

 

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2015

 

$

(62,985)

 

$

(21,773)

 

$

(3,195)

 

$

(87,953)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

(17,855)

 

 

(9,593)

 

 

(7,001)

 

 

(34,449)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items (a)

 

 

808

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

808

Actuarial losses (a)

 

 

8,838

 

 

2,825

 

 

 —

 

 

11,663

Tax benefit

 

 

(3,548)

 

 

(1,044)

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,592)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(11,757)

 

 

(7,812)

 

 

(7,001)

 

 

(26,570)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2016

 

$

(74,742)

 

$

(29,585)

 

$

(10,196)

 

$

(114,523)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 2017

 

    

Pension

    

Postretirement

    

Foreign

    

 

 

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Exchange

 

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2016

 

$

(74,742)

 

$

(29,585)

 

$

(10,196)

 

$

(114,523)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

24,109

 

 

5,197

 

 

2,205

 

 

31,511

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items (a)

 

 

808

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

808

Actuarial losses (a)

 

 

11,239

 

 

4,278

 

 

 —

 

 

15,517

Tax benefit

 

 

(4,426)

 

 

(1,581)

 

 

 —

 

 

(6,007)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

31,730

 

 

7,894

 

 

2,205

 

 

41,829

Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of September 30, 2017

 

$

(43,012)

 

$

(21,691)

 

$

(7,991)

 

$

(72,694)


84

(1)

(a)

These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.

Note 18. Long-term ObligationObligations

The following table sets for the components of Long-term obligations as of September 30, 2021 and 2022.

September 30, 

September 30, 

    

2021

    

2022

    

Finance lease obligations

$

7,613

$

7,384

Environmental post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities

566

407

Long-term disability

231

210

Deferred dividends

210

199

Less amounts due within one year

 

(319)

 

(352)

Long-term obligations (less current portion)

$

8,301

$

7,848

Note 19. Leases

On October 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).  This new guidance requires that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than twelve months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability.  The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-02 in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using the modified retrospective transition method, which did not require the Company to adjust comparative periods.  The Company’s right-of-use assets (“ROU”) and lease liabilities are recognized on the lease commencement date in an amount that represents the present value of future lease payments.  ROU assets are included in Other assets, and the related lease obligation is included in Operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

Nature of the Leases

The Company has operating and finance leases for buildings, equipment (e.g. trucks and forklifts), vehicles, and computer equipment. Leasing arrangements require fixed payments and also include an amount that is probable will be owed under residual value guarantees, if applicable. Some lease payments also include payments related to purchase or termination options when the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise the option or is not reasonably certain not to exercise the option, respectively.  The leases have remaining terms of 1 to 15 years.

For all leases with an initial expected term of more than 12 months, the Company recorded, at the adoption date of ASC 842 or lease commencement date for leases entered into after the adoption date, a lease liability, which is the lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or to control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company utilizes its collateralized incremental borrowing rate commensurate to the lease term as the discount rate for its leases, unless the Company can specifically determine the lessor’s implicit rate.

On January 1, 2015, the companyCompany entered into a capitalfinance lease agreement for the building that houses the assets and operations of LaPorte Custom Metal Processing (LCMP).  The capitalleased asset and obligation are recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments.  The asset is included in Property, plant and equipment, net on the Consolidated

78


Balance Sheet and is depreciated over the 20 year20-year lease term.  The long term component of the capitalfinance lease obligation is included in Long term obligations.

The Company entered into a twenty-year “build-to-suit” lease for a building that will househouses the assets and operations of the service center to be located in LaPorte, Indiana that is beingwas relocated from Lebanon, Indiana (See Note 20).Indiana.  During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company took occupancy of the building.  The Company retained substantially all of the construction risk and was deemed to be the owner of the facility for accounting purposes, even though it is not the legal owner.  Construction costs incurred relative to the buildout of the facility of approximately $4,100 are included in Property, plant and equipment,

85

net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be depreciated over the 20-year lease term.  The Company accounts for the related build-to-suit liability as a financing obligation.

Significant Judgments and Assumptions

As

Determination of Whether a Contract Contains a Lease

The Company determines whether a contract is or contains a lease at the inception of the contract. The contract is or contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified assets for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The Company generally must also have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the property, plant, and equipment and have the right to direct its use.

Practical Expedients (Policy Elections)

The Company elected certain practical expedients and transition relief, including the short-term lease recognition exemption, which excludes leases with a term of 12 months or less from recognition on the balance sheet, recognizing lease components and non-lease components together as a single lease component, and the transition relief package which, among other things, includes not reassessing the lease classification or whether a contract is or contains a lease. 

The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s lease cost for the year ended September 30, 2021 and 2022.

September 30,

September 30,

 

2021

2022

 

Finance lease cost:

Amortization of right of use asset

$

430

$

430

Interest on lease liabilities

806

784

Total finance lease cost

$

1,236

$

1,214

Operating lease cost

$

1,687

$

1,100

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

Operating cash flows from finance leases

806

784

Operating cash flows from operating leases

1,687

1,100

Financing cash flows from finance leases

195

228

Total cash paid for amounts included in measurement of lease liabilities

$

2,688

$

2,112

Lease costs associated with short term leases are not material.

The following table sets forth the Company’s right of use assets and lease liabilities as of September 30, 2017, future minimum2021 and 2022.

September 30,

September 30,

 

2021

2022

 

Finance lease assets (included in Property, plant and equipment, net)

$

6,218

$

5,643

Operating right of use lease assets (included in Other assets)

$

1,494

$

1,085

Finance lease liabilities

Accrued expenses

$

228

$

265

Long-term obligations (less current portion)

7,385

7,119

Total Finance lease liabilities

$

7,613

$

7,384

Operating lease liabilities

$

1,494

$

1,085

86

Operating lease rental payments applicable to the lease obligations were as follows.

 

 

 

 

 

2018

    

$

983

 

2019

 

 

988

 

2020

 

 

995

 

2021

 

 

1,000

 

2022

 

 

1,012

 

Thereafter

 

 

13,634

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

 

18,612

 

Less amounts representing interest

 

 

(10,320)

 

Present value of net minimum lease payments

 

 

8,292

 

Less current obligation

 

 

(926)

 

Total long-term lease obligation

 

$

7,366

 

The lease obligations is includeddue within one year are recorded in Long-term obligations (less current portion)Accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

Capital lease rental payments

 

$

4,331

 

$

4,275

 

Finance lease rental payments

 

 

3,700

 

 

4,017

 

Environmental post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities

 

 

683

 

 

633

 

Less amounts due within one year

 

 

(458)

 

 

(1,029)

 

Long-term obligations (less current portion)

 

$

8,256

 

$

7,896

 

September 30,

September 30, 

    

2021

2022

Weighted average lease term (Years)

Finance leases

14.1

13.1

Operating leases

2.5

3.0

Weighted average discount rate

Finance leases

10.32

%

10.32

%

Operating leases

5.25

%

5.25

%

Note 19. Acquisition

On January 7, 2015, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Leveltek Processing, LLC located in LaPorte, Indiana for $14,600 in cash.  The acquisition of the LaPorte assets provides the Company control of sheet stretching, leveling, slitting and cut-to-length operations that were previously outsourced functions. The acquired business is being operated by LaPorte Custom Metal Processing, LLC (LCMP), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

79


The following is a summarytable of the purchase price allocation in connection with the LCMP acquisition.  The determination of fair value for acquired assets includes the use of Level 3 inputs, such as the conditionfuture minimum lease payments during each fiscal year under operating and utilization of the property, plantfinance leases and equipment acquired, management’s projected financial results for LCMP and the discount rate used to determine the present value of anticipated future cash flows.the net minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2022.

Purchase Price

Allocation

Property, plant and equipment, net

7,563

Customer relationships

2,100

Inventory

148

Total identifiable net assets

9,811

Goodwill

4,789

Total purchase price

14,600

Finance

 

Operating

 

Future minimum lease payments

Leases

Leases

2023

$

1,024

$

507

2024

 

1,032

 

381

2025

 

1,037

 

154

2026

 

1,044

 

82

2027

 

1,049

 

62

Thereafter

 

8,408

 

Total minimum lease payments

13,594

1,186

Less: amount representing interest

(6,210)

(101)

Present value of net minimum lease payments

$

7,384

$

1,085

The goodwill recognized in connection with the Leveltek-LaPorte assets consists of the value associated with the addition of the stretching and leveling capabilities as well as increased capacity in slitting and cut-to-length operations to meet customer demand and is tax deductible.  The complementary asset capabilities are expected to lead to operating cost synergies as well as expand the Company’s commercial offerings.

Note 20. Expansion of LaPorte, Indiana Operations

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company announced on May 2, 2016 its decision to expand and streamline its distribution footprint by investing in new plant and equipment at its processing facility located in LaPorte, Indiana.  In connectionenters into foreign currency forward contracts with the expansion,purpose of reducing income statement volatility resulting from foreign currency denominated transactions. The Company has not designated the Company is relocating its service center operationscontacts as hedges; therefore, changes in Lebanon, Indiana to LaPorte.  The project beganfair value are recognized in the first quarterearnings.  All of fiscal 2017 and is expectedthese contracts are designed to be completed bysettled within the end of the secondsame fiscal quarter of fiscal 2018.

Costs associated with the projectthey are estimated to consist of approximately $1,800  to $2,500 relating to equipment relocationentered into and, approximately $500 to $1,100 in other costs, including one-time termination benefits, relocation expenses and lease termination costs, for a total of approximately $2,300 to $3,600 in total costs relating to the move.  Approximately $340 and $1,100 of these costs were expensed in fiscal 2016 and 2017, respectively.  The remainder is expected to be expensed over the remainder of the project period.

Note 21.  Restricted Cash

Asaccordingly, as of September 30, 2016,2020, 2021 and 2022, there are no contracts that remain unsettled.  As a result, there is no impact to the Company had cashbalance sheet as of $5,446 held in an account that was restricted from use awaitingSeptember 30, 2021 or September 30, 2022.  Foreign exchange contract gains and losses are recorded within Selling, General and Administrative expenses on the fulfillmentConsolidated Statements of a customer order.  The remaining obligations to ship were fulfilled during fiscal 2017 at which time the remaining funds were released from restriction.Operations along with foreign currency transactional gains and losses as follows.

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

September 30,

September 30,

September 30,

    

2020

2021

2022

Foreign currency transactional gain (loss)

    

$

(567)

$

(42)

$

4,393

Foreign exchange forward contract gain (loss)

    

(273)

(532)

(6,066)

Net gain (loss) included in selling, general and administrative expense

$

(840)

$

(574)

$

(1,673)

8087


Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and ProceduresProcedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pursuant to Rule 13a‑15(b)13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act the Company has performed, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2017.2022.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As ofThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company has not had any material changes2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to itsmaterially affect, our internal control over Financial Reporting.financial reporting.  

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Exchange Act rules 13a‑15(f)13a-15(f) and 15d‑15(f)15d-15(f)) for the Company. With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of The Treadway Commission (2013). Based on the Company’s assessment, management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2017,2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20172022 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its attestation report which is included herein.

Mark M. ComerfordMichael L. Shor

President & Chief Executive Officer

November 16, 201717, 2022

Daniel W. Maudlin
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
November 16, 2017

17, 2022

Item 9B.  Other InformationInformation

None.

8188


Item 9C.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

None.

89

Part IIIIII

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceGovernance

The information included under the caption “Business—Executive Officers of the Company” in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K,10-K, and under the captions “Election of Directors”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, “Corporate Governance—Code of Ethics”, “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Committee and Director Nominations”, “Corporate Governance—Board Committee Structure”, “Corporate Governance—Family Relationships” and “Corporate Governance—Independence of the Board of Directors and Committee Members” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the 2023 meeting of the Company’s stockholders on February 28, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive CompensationCompensation

The information included under the captions “Executive Compensation”, “Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Corporate Governance—Director Compensation Program” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the 2023 meeting of the Company’s stockholders on February 28, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersMatters

The information contained under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Management” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the 2023 meeting of the Company’s stockholders on February 28, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. For additional information regarding the Company’s stock option plans, please see Note 1112 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of September 30, 20172022 regarding shares of the Company’s common stock issuable pursuant to its stock option and restricted stock plans:

    

    

    

Number of securities

 

remaining available

 

for future

 

Number of

issuance under

 

securities to

equity

 

be issued upon

Weighted-average

compensation

 

exercise

exercise price of

plans (excluding

 

of outstanding

outstanding

securities reflected

 

options,

options,

in the

 

Plan Category

warrants and rights

warrants and rights

second column)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

 

697,220

$

34.75

 

578,889

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Number of securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

remaining available

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for future

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

issuance under

 

 

 

securities to

 

 

 

 

equity

 

 

 

be issued upon

 

Weighted-average

 

compensation

 

 

 

exercise

 

exercise price of

 

plans (excluding

 

 

 

of outstanding

 

outstanding

 

securities reflected

 

 

 

options,

 

options,

 

in the

 

Plan Category

 

warrants and rights

 

warrants and rights

 

second column)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

 

425,326

 

$

44.93

 

598,025

(2)


(1)

(1)

For a description of the Company’s equity compensation plans, see Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

(2)

(2)

Includes (i) 377,075216,105 shares of stock options or stock appreciation rights and (ii) 220,950362,784 shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceIndependence

The information contained under the caption “Corporate Governance—Independence of Board of Directors and Committee Members” and under “Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transactions” in the Proxy Statement to be issued

82


in connection with the 2023 meeting of the Company’s stockholders on February 28, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

90

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesServices

The information included under the caption “Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the 2023 meeting of the Company’s stockholders on February 28, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

8391


Part IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

(a)

Documents filed as part of this Report.

1.

Financial Statements:

The Consolidated Financial Statements of this Report.

1.Financial Statements:

The Financial StatementsHaynes International, Inc. and its subsidiaries are set forth under Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.10-K.

2.Financial Statement Schedules:

Financial Statement Schedules:

Financial Statement Schedules are omitted as they are not required, are not applicable or the information is shown in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

3.

Exhibits:

(b)Exhibits. SeeThe following Index to Exhibits which is incorporated herein by reference.

(c)Financial Statement Schedules: None

84


INDEX TO EXHIBITSEXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number

Description 

3.1

Exhibit
Number

Description 

3.1

Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1,S-1, Registration No. 333‑140194)333-140194).

3.2

Amended and Restated By‑lawsBy-laws of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration StatementQuarterly Report on Form S‑1, Registration No. 333‑140194)10-Q filed May 3, 2018).

4.1

Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Haynes International, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009)10-Q filed February 8, 2010).

4.2

Second Restated CertificateDescription of Incorporation of Haynes International, Inc.Registrant’s Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 hereof)4.2 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2021).

4.3

10.1+

Amended and Restated By‑laws of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 hereof).

10.1

Form of Termination Benefits Agreements by and between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its employees, conformed to give effect to all amendments thereto through September 30, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended September 30,10-K filed November 17, 2011).

10.2

10.2+

Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and among Haynes International, Inc., Haynes Wire Company, the Lenders (as defined therein), Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as agent for the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8‑K filed July 20, 2011).

10.3

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its directors named in the schedule to the Exhibit (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1,S-1, Registration No. 333‑140194)333-140194).

10.4

10.3

Conversion Services Agreement by and between the Company and Titanium Metals Corporation, dated November 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1,S-1, Registration No. 333‑140194)333-140194). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10.5

10.4

Access and Security Agreement by and between the Company and Titanium Metals Corporation, dated November 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1,S-1, Registration No. 333‑140194)333-140194).

10.6

10.5+

Haynes International, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors on January 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1, Registration No. 333‑140194).

10.7

Form of Non‑Qualified Stock Option Agreement to be used in conjunction with grants made pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1, Registration No. 333‑140194).

10.8

Second Amended and Restated Haynes International, Inc. Stock Option Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors on January 22, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1, Registration No. 333‑140194).

10.9

Form of Non‑Qualified Stock Option Agreements between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its executive officers and directors named in the schedule to the Exhibit pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S‑1, Registration No. 333‑140194).

10.10

Executive Employment Agreement by and between Haynes International, Inc. and Mark Comerford dated September 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008).

85


Exhibit
Number

Description 

10.11

Non‑Qualified Stock Option Agreement by and between Haynes International, Inc. and Mark Comerford, dated October 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Haynes International, Inc. Form 8‑K filed October 7, 2008).

10.12

Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement by and between Haynes International, Inc. and Mark Comerford, dated August 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 8‑K filed August 7, 2009).

10.13

Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Haynes International, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009).

10.14

Summary of 20172022 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the Haynes International, Inc. Form 8-K filed November 29, 2016)30, 2021).

10.15

10.6+

Amendment No.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011).

10.16

Amendment No. 2 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013).

10.17

Amendment No. 3 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014).

10.18

Amendment No. 4 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014).

10.19

Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and among Haynes International, Inc., Haynes Wire Company, the Lenders (as defined therein), Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as agent for the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8‑K filed September 20, 2013).

10.20

Amendment No. 2 to Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and among Haynes International, Inc., the Lenders (as defined therein), Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as agent for the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8‑K filed July 13, 2016).

10.21

Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 7, 2016).

10.22**10.7+

Form of Restricted Stock AwardsAward Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its directors, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 16, 2017).

92

Exhibit
Number

Description 

10.23**10.8+

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. of certain of its officers, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 16, 2017).

10.24**10.9+

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its officers, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 16, 2017).

10.25**10.10+

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its officers and other employees, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 16, 2017).

21.1**10.11+

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain of its officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 the Haynes International Annual Report on Form 10K filed November 15, 2018).

10.12+

Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 2018, by and between the Company and Michael L. Shor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 15, 2018).

10.13+

Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment  Agreement  between Haynes International, Inc. and Michael L. Shor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 13, 2022).

10.14+

Form of Amendment No 1 to Termination Benefits Agreements with the Company’s Named Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 13, 2022)

10.15+

Haynes International, Inc. 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 27, 2020).

10.16+

Amendment No. 1 to Haynes International, Inc. 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed January 21, 2022).

10.17+

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its directors, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2020 Incentive Compensation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2021).

10.18+

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its officers, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2021).

10.19+

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its officers, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2021).

10.20+

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its officers and other employees, issued pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 18, 2021).

10.21

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2020, by and among Haynes International, Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2020).

10.22

Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2022, by and among Haynes International, Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2022).

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K filed November 15, 2018).

23.1**

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

31.1**

Rule 13a‑14(a)13a-14(a)/15d‑4(a)15d-4(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2**

Rule 13a‑14(a)13a-14(a)/15d‑14(a)15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1**

Section 1350 Certifications

93

Exhibit
Number

Description 

101**

The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022 formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)(iXBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (11) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss); (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) related notes.

104

*

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)


*

Filed herewith.

**

Furnished herewith.

+

Denotes management contract or compensation plan, contract or arrangement.

**Filed herewith

Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary

None.

8694


SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Haynes International, Inc.

Haynes International, Inc.

By:

/s/ Mark M. Comerford Michael L. Shor

Mark M. ComerfordMichael L. Shor

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 16, 201717, 2022

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Mark M. ComerfordMichael L. Shor

Mark M. ComerfordMichael L. Shor

President and Chief Executive Officer; Director (Principal Executive Officer)

November 16, 2017

17, 2022

/s/ Daniel W. Maudlin

Daniel W. Maudlin

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

November 16, 2017

17, 2022

/s/ David S. Van Bibber

David S. Van Bibber

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

November 16, 2017

17, 2022

/s/ Michael L. ShorRobert H. Getz

Michael L. ShorRobert H. Getz

Chairman of the Board, Director

November 16, 2017

17, 2022

/s/ Donald C. Campion

Donald C. Campion

Director

November 16, 2017

17, 2022

/s/ John C. Corey

John C. Corey

Director

November 16, 2017

/s/ Robert H. Getz

Robert H. Getz

Director

November 16, 2017

/s/ Dawne S. Hickton

Dawne S. Hickton

Director

November 16, 2017

17, 2022

/s/ William P. Walllarry O. spencer

William P. WallLarry O. Spencer

Director

November 16, 201717, 2022

8795