Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K10-K/A

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from                              to

Commission file number: 000-26408

WAYSIDE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

13-3136104

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

(IRS Employer Identification Number)

4 Industrial Way West, Suite 300 Eatontown, NJ

07724

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 389-0932

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

    

Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol

    

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

WSTG

The NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes  No  

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data fileFile required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or other information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer 

Accelerated filer 

Non-accelerated filer 

Smaller reporting company 

(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant computed by reference to the closing sale price for the Registrant’s Common Stock as of June 30, 2017,28, 2019, which was the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, as reported on The NASDAQ Global Market, was approximately $76,651,368$47,485,650 (In determining the market value of the Common Stock held by any non-affiliates, shares of Common Stock of the Registrant beneficially owned by directors, officers and holders of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Registrant have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes).

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of February 27, 201820, 2020 was 4,504,2034,562,444 shares.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions


EXPLANATORY NOTE

On March 4, 2020, Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (“Wayside”) filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Original Form 10-K”). Wayside is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K/A”) because it will not file its definitive proxy statement within 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. This Form 10-K/A amends and restates in its entirety Part III, Items 10 through 14 of the Registrant’sOriginal Form 10-K, to include information previously omitted from the Original Form 10-K in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. The reference on the cover page of the Original Form 10-K to the incorporation by reference of portions of Wayside’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed on or before May 1, 2018 are incorporated by referenceproxy statement into Part III of the Original Form 10-K is hereby deleted. In this Report.


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes “forward-looking statements” withinForm 10-K/A, unless the meaning of Section 21E ofcontext indicates otherwise, the Exchange Act. Statements in this report regarding future events or conditions, including but not limited to statements regarding industry prospects anddesignations “Wayside”, the Company’s expected financial position, business and financing plans, are forward-looking statements.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. We strongly urge current and prospective investors to carefully consider the cautionary statements and risks contained in this report, particularly the risks described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” herein. Such risks include, but are not limited to, the continued acceptance of the Company’s distribution channel by vendors and customers, the timely availability and acceptance of new products, contribution of key vendor relationships and support programs, as well as factors that affect the software industry generally.

The Company operates in a rapidly changing business, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. Management cannot predict every risk factor, nor can it assess the impact, if any, of all such risk factors on the Company’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The statements concerning future sales, future gross profit margin and future selling and administrative expenses are forward looking statements involving certain risks and uncertainties such as availability of products, product mix, pricing pressures, market conditions and other factors, which could result in a fluctuation of sales below recent experience.


PART I

Item 1 Business

General

Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company,” “us,” “we,” “our” or “our”) is an information technology (“IT”) channel company. The Company operates through two reportable operating segments.  The “Lifeboat Distribution” segment distributes technical software and hardware to corporate resellers, value added resellers (VARs), consultants and systems integrators worldwide.  The “TechXtend” segment is a value-added reseller of software, hardware and services for corporations, government organizations and academic institutions in the USA and Canada. We offer an extensive line of products from leading publishers of software and tools for virtualization/cloud computing, security, networking, storage and infrastructure management, application lifecycle management and other technically sophisticated domains as well as computer hardware.

The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1982. Our Common Stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “WSTG”. Our main web site address is www.waysidetechnology.com, and the other web sites maintained by our business include www.lifeboatdistribution.com, and www.techxtend.com.  Reference to these “uniform resource locators” or “URLs” is made as an inactive textual reference for informational purposes only. Information on our web sites should not be considered filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not, and should not be deemed to be, a part of this report.

In our Lifeboat segment, we distribute technology products from software developers, publishers or equipment manufacturers to resellers, and system integrators worldwide. We purchase software, maintenance/service agreements, networking/storage/security equipment and complementary products from our vendors and sell them to our reseller customers. Generally, a vendor authorizes a limited of number of companies to act as distributors of their product and sell to resellers of their product. Our reseller customers include value-added resellers, or VARs, corporate resellers, government resellers, system integrators, direct marketers, and national IT superstores. We combine our core strengths in customer service, marketing, distribution, credit and billing to allow our customers to achieve greater efficiencies in time to market in the IT channel in a cost effective manner.

Our Lifeboat Distribution business is characterized by low gross profit as a percentage of revenue, or gross margin, and price competition.   In our Lifeboat segment, we are highly dependent on the end-market demand for the products we sell, and on our partners’ strategic initiatives and business models. This end-market demand is influenced by many factors including the introduction of new products, replacement and renewal cycles for existing products, competitive products, overall economic growth and general business activity. A difficult and challenging economic environment may also lead to consolidation or decline in the industry and increased price-based competition. 

We also provide comprehensive IT solutions directly to end users through our TechXtend segment. Products in this segment are acquired directly from equipment manufacturers, software developers or distributors and sold to end users. We provide customer service, billing, sales and marketing support in this segment and also provide extended payment terms to facilitate sales.

Products

An essential part of our ongoing operations and growth plans is the continued recruitment of software publishers for which we become authorized distributors of their products. The Company offers a wide variety of technology products from a broad range of publishers and manufacturers, such as Bluebeam Software, Dell/Dell Software, erwin, Flexera Software, Hewlett Packard, Infragistics, Intel Software, Lenovo, Micro Focus Microsoft, Mindjet, Samsung, SmartBear Software, SolarWinds, Sophos, StorageCraft Technology, TechSmith, Unitrends, Veeam Software and VMware. On a continuous basis, we screen new products for inclusion in our direct sales portfolio, and web sites based on their features, quality, price, profit margins and warranties, as well as on current sales trends. The

1


Company predominantly sells software, software subscriptions, and maintenance. Sales of hardware and peripherals represented 7%, 10%,  and 10% of our overall net sales in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Marketing and Distribution

We market products through creative marketing communications, including our web sites, local and on-line seminars, webinars, and social media. We also use direct e-mail and printed material to introduce new products and upgrades, to cross-sell products to current customers, and to educate and inform existing and potential customers. We believe that our blend of electronic and traditional marketing and selling programs are important marketing vehicles for software publishers and manufacturers. These programs provide a cost-effective and service-oriented means to market and sell and fulfill software products and meet the needs of users.

The Company had two customers that each accounted for more than 10% of total sales for 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Software House International Corporation (“SHI”), and CDW Corporation (“CDW”) accounted for 23.0%, and 19.4%, respectively, of consolidated net sales and, as of December 31, 2017, 15.1% and 28.6%, respectively, of total net accounts receivable. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Software House International Corporation (“SHI”), and CDW Corporation (“CDW”) accounted for 19.6%, and 17.9%, respectively, of consolidated net sales,  and, as of December 31, 2016, 13.3%, and 23.2%, respectively, of total net accounts receivable. For the year ended December 31, 2015, SHI, and CDW Corporation accounted for 19.0%, and 17.9%, respectively, of consolidated net sales. Our top five customers accounted for 52%, 48%, and 52% of consolidated net sales in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company generally ships products within 48 hours of confirming a customer’s order. This results in minimum backlog in the business.

Sales to customers in Canada represented 7%, 7%, and 6% of our consolidated revenue in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Sales in Europe and the rest of the world represented 6%, 6%, and 6% of our consolidated revenue in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. For geographic financial information, please“us” refer to Note 9 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Customer Support

We believe that providing a high level of customer service is necessary to compete effectively, and is essential to continued sales and revenue growth. Our account representatives assist our customers with all aspects of purchasing decisions, order processing, and inquiries on order status, product pricing and availability. The account representatives are trained to answer all basic questions about the features and functionality of products.

Purchasing and Fulfillment

The Company’s success is dependent, in part, upon the ability of its suppliers to develop and market products that meet the changing requirements of the marketplace. The Company believes it enjoys good relationships with its vendors. The Company and its principal vendors have cooperated frequently in product introductions and in other marketing programs. As is customary in the industry, the Company has no long-term supply contracts with any of its suppliers. Substantially all of the Company’s contracts with its vendors are terminable upon 30 days’ notice or less. Moreover, the manner in which software products are distributed and sold is changing, and new methods of distribution and sale may emerge or expand. Software publishers have sold, and may intensify their efforts to sell, their products directly to end-users. The Company’s business and results of operations may be adversely affected if the terms and conditions of the Company’s authorizations with its vendors were to be significantly modified or if certain products become unavailable to the Company.

We believe that effective purchasing from a diverse vendor base is a key element of our business strategy. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Sophos and Solarwinds accounted for 26.4% and 14.7%, respectively of our consolidated purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Sophos and Solarwinds accounted for 23.1% and 10.8%, respectively, of our consolidated purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2015, Sophos was the only individual vendor from whom our purchases exceeded 10% of our total purchases and accounted for 24.2% of our total

2


purchases.  The loss of a key vendor or group of vendors could disrupt our product availability and otherwise have an adverse effect on the Company.

In 2017,  2016 and 2015 the Company purchased approximately 96% of its products directly from manufacturers and publishers and the balance from multiple distributors. Most suppliers or distributors will “drop ship” products directly to the customers, which reduces physical handling by the Company. Inventory management techniques, such as “drop shipping” allow the Company to offer a greater range of products without increased inventory requirements or associated risk.

Inventory levels may vary from period to period, due in part to increases or decreases in sales levels, the Company’s practice of making large-volume purchases when it deems the terms of such purchases to be attractive, and the addition of new suppliers and products. Moreover, the Company’s order fulfillment and inventory control systems allow the Company to order certain products just in time for next day shipping. The Company promotes the use of electronic data interchange (“EDI”) with its suppliers and customers, which helps reduce overhead and the use of paper in the ordering process. Although brand names and individual products are important to our business, we believe that competitive sources of supply are available for substantially all of the product categories we carry.

The Company operates a distribution facility in Eatontown, New Jersey.

Competition

The software market is highly competitive and characterized by aggressive pricing practices by both software distributors and resellers.  This has resulted in declining gross margins as a percentage of sales, which the Company expects to continue. The Company faces competition from a wide variety of sources competing principally on the basis of price, product availability, customer service and technical support. In the Lifeboat Distribution segment, we compete against much larger broad-line distributors, as well as specialty distributors and, in some cases, the direct sales teams of the vendors we represent, who also sell directly to the end-customers.  In the TechXtend segment, we compete against vendors who sell directly to customers, as well as software resellers, superstores, e-commerce vendors, and other direct marketers of software and hardware products. In both segments, some of our competitors are significantly larger and have substantially greater resources than the Company.

There can be no assurance that the Company can compete effectively against existing competitors or new competitors that may enter the market or that it can generate profit margins which represent a fair return to the Company. An increase in the amount of competition faced by the Company, or its failure to compete effectively against its competitors, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company competes with other distributors and resellers to become an authorized distributor or reseller of products from software developers and publishers. It also competes with distributors and resellers to attract prospective buyers, and to source new products from software developers and publishers, and to market its current product line to customers. The Company believes that its ability to offer software developers and IT professionals easy access to a wide selection of the desired IT products at reasonable prices with prompt delivery and high customer service levels, along with its good relationships with vendors and suppliers, allows it to compete effectively. The Company competes to gain distribution rights for new products primarily on the basis of its reputation for successfully bringing new products to market and the strength of and quality of its relationships with software publishers.

The market for the software products we sell is characterized by rapid changes in technology, user requirements, and customer specifications. The manner in which software products are distributed and sold is changing, and new methods of distribution and sale may emerge or expand. Software developers and publishers have sold, and may intensify their efforts to sell, their products directly to end-users. The continuing evolution of the Internet as a platform in which to conduct e-commerce business transactions has both lowered the barriers for competition and broadened customer access to products and information, increasing competition and reducing prices. From time to time, certain software developers and publishers have instituted programs for the direct sale of large order quantities of software to certain major corporate accounts. These types of programs may continue to be developed and used by

3


various developers and publishers. While some software developers and publishers currently sell new releases or upgrades directly to end users, they have not attempted to completely bypass the distribution and reseller channels. There can be no assurances, however, that software developers and publishers will continue using distributors and resellers to the same extent they currently do. Future efforts by software developers and publishers to bypass third-party sales channels could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business operations and financial conditions.

In addition, resellers and publishers may attempt to increase the volume of software products distributed electronically through ESD (Electronic Software Distribution) technology, through subscription services, and through on-line shopping services. Any of these competitive programs, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. For a description of additional risks relating to competition in our industry, please refer to “Item 1.A. Risk Factors”: “We rely on our suppliers for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing incentives and competitive products to sell”, and “The IT products and services industry is intensely competitive and actions of competitors, including manufacturers of products we sell, can negatively affect our business.”

Management Information Systems

The Company operates management information systems on Windows 2008 and Windows 2012 platforms that allow for centralized management of key functions, including inventory, accounts receivable, purchasing, sales and distribution. We are dependent on the accuracy and proper utilization of our information technology systems, including our telephone, websites, e-mail and fax systems.

The management information systems allow the Company to monitor sales trends, provide real-time product availability and order status information, track direct marketing campaign performance and to make marketing event driven purchasing decisions. In addition to the main system, the Company has systems of networked personal computers, as well as microcomputer-based desktop publishing systems, which facilitate data sharing and provide an automated office environment.

The Company recognizes the need to continually upgrade its management information systems to most effectively manage its operations and customer database. In that regard, the Company anticipates that it will, from time to time, require software and hardware upgrades for its present management information systems.

Trademarks

The Company conducts its business under various trademarks and service marks including Lifeboat Distribution, TechXtend and International Software Partners. The Company protects these trademarks and service marks and believes that they have significant value to us and are important factors in our marketing programs.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries had 138 full-time employeesSubsidiaries.

In addition, as required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), certifications by Wayside’s principal executive officer and 2 part-time employees. The Companyprincipal financial officer pursuant to Sections 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K/A. Because no financial statements have been included in this Form 10-K/A and this Form 10-K/A does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K, paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the certifications have been omitted. We are not including the certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as no financial statements are being filed with this Form 10-K/A.

Except as described above, this Form 10-K/A does not modify or update disclosure in, or exhibits to, the Original Form 10-K. Furthermore, this Form 10-K/A does not change any previously reported financial results, nor, except as otherwise indicated, does it reflect events occurring after the date of the Original Form 10-K. Information not affected by this Form 10-K/A remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time the Original Form 10-K was filed. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-K and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS

Set forth below is not a partycertain information, as of April 29, 2020, with respect to any collective bargaining agreements with its employees, has experienced no work stoppageseach of our directors and considers its relationships with its employees to be satisfactory.one nominee for election at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

Name

Age

Principal Occupation and Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills

Director
Since

Diana Kurty

66

Ms. Kurty has served as a director of the Company since December 2015. Ms. Kurty has served as  a principal with Lumina Partners, which provides business consulting, transaction advisory, valuation and other services primarily to small businesses in Western New York,  since 2004. She brings three decades of broad-based leadership in strategy and management, finance, operations, controls, treasury, investment management, mergers and acquisitions, human resources and facilities management. Ms. Kurty is a C.P.A. and previously held the positions of Vice President of Finance of Sutherland Global Services, Chief Financial Officer of IEC Electronics, Vice President and Corporate Controller of Goulds Pumps, as well as Senior Audit Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ms. Kurty is also currently a member of the Board of Trustees and Chair of the Audit Committee of the University of Rochester Medical Center, the largest employer in the Rochester area. She also currently serves as a member of the Board of Trustees and Chair of the Audit Committee of UR Medicine Home Care (VNS), a home health agency. The Board believes that Ms. Kurty’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her wealth of accounting and financial knowledge, as well as her public company and industry-specific experience.

December 2015

Jeffrey Geygan

58

Mr. Geygan has served as a director of the Company since February 2018, and as Board Chair since May 2018. Mr. Geygan has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of GVIC, an investment research and advisory services firm, since he founded it in 2007. Prior to founding GVIC, Mr. Geygan served as a Senior Portfolio Manager at UBS Financial Services. Mr. Geygan has taught undergraduate and graduate-level courses at IE University in Madrid, Spain, the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee Lubar School of Business, and the College of Charleston. He serves on the Advisory Board of the University of Wisconsin – Madison Department of Economics. The Board believes that his qualifications to serve on the Board and as Board Chair include his years of experience in the finance industry. 

February 2018

John McCarthy

56

Mr. McCarthy has served as a director of the Company since June 2019. On May 30, 2019, the Board of the Company appointed Mr. McCarthy as a director of the Company upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by an employee of the Company. Mr. McCarthy is President and Chief Executive Officer of Mainline Information Systems, a nationally recognized technology solution provider he joined in April 2009. Mr. McCarthy previously held executive management positions with EMC, StorageApps, CNT, MCData and Virtual Iron. Mr. McCarthy  served as a member of the board of directors of Nasuni Corporation until November 2019, and currently serves as a member of the Operating Board for Stripes Group, and a member of the Board of Trustees

June 2019

2


Name

Age

Principal Occupation and Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills

Director
Since

for Providence College. The Board believes that Mr. McCarthy’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his substantial industry and executive leadership experience.

Andy Bryant

64

Mr. Bryant has served as a director of the Company since July 2019. On July 9, 2019, the Board of the Company appointed Mr. Bryant as a director of the Company upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by a director of the Company. Mr. Bryant spent most of his career at Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Avnet, Inc., both Fortune 500 companies focused on supply chain services for electronic components and enterprise computing solutions globally. From April 2008 until his retirement in May 2016, Mr. Bryant held executive management positions with Arrow Electronics, Inc. Mr. Bryant was named President of the company’s Enterprise Computing Solutions business in 2008 and specified as an executive officer of the corporation. He served as the Chief Operating Officer of the company from May 2014 to May 2016. Prior to his tenure at Arrow, he served as President of Avnet’s global operating groups and as a Senior Vice President of Avnet, Inc. He was specified as a corporate officer of Avnet in 1996 and became an executive officer in 1999. Mr Bryant has been a director of Enavate Holdings, LLC, a company specializing in business consulting and industry-focused enterprise software solutions, since June 2017. The Board believes that his qualifications to serve on the Board include his years of experience in the technology distribution industry.

July 2019

Ross Crane

57

Mr. Crane has served as a director of the Company since December 2019. On December 11, 2019, the Board of the Company appointed Mr. Crane as a director of the Company upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by a director of the Company. From 2011 to 2019, Mr. Crane served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Nexeo Solutions, the third largest chemical and plastics distributor in the world with $4 billion in annual revenue. From 2008 to 2011, Crane served as Chief Financial Officer for Belkin International, a large manufacturer of consumer electronic products and accessories. He also served in a variety of senior finance and operational roles with Ingram Micro Inc. from 2005 to 2008 and Avnet Inc. from 1994 to 2005. The Board believes that his qualifications to serve on the Board include his years of extensive senior executive finance experience, as well as his public company and industry-specific experience.

December 2019

Dale Foster

56

Mr. Foster was appointed our Chief Executive Officer and elected to our Board in January 2020. On January 15, 2020, the Board appointed Mr. Foster as a director of the Company based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He previously held the positions of President of Lifeboat Distribution, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, from July 2019 to January 2020 and Executive Vice President of the Company from January 2018 to July 2019. From November 2012 until January 2018, Mr. Foster served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Promark Technology Inc. (“Promark”), which operated as a subsidiary of Ingram Micro Inc. From 1997 until Promark was acquired by Ingram Micro Inc. in 2012, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Promark, a value-added distributor with the core focus of distributing

January 2020

3


Name

Age

Principal Occupation and Experience, Qualifications, Attributes or Skills

Director
Since

emerging data storage and virtualization solutions. The Board believes that his qualifications to serve on the Board include his years of experience in the technology distribution industry.

Carol DiBattiste

68

On March 16, 2020, the Board nominated Ms. DiBattiste for election to the Board based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. She was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by an advisor to the Company. Ms. DiBattiste currently serves as the Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary at comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ:SCOR) (“comScore”), a media measurement company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises. She joined comScore in January 2017. From May 2016 to August 2016, she served as Senior Advisor for Appeals Modernization, Office of the Secretary and from August 2016 to January 2017 she served as Executive in Charge and Vice Chairman, Board of Veterans’ Appeals, both with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. From March 2013 to March 2016, Ms. DiBattiste served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal, Privacy, Security, and Administrative Officer with Education Management Corporation (OTC:EDMCQ). Prior to that, she held senior executive roles at multiple other public companies, including Geeknet, which was acquired by GameStop (NYSE:GME) and Reed Elsevier/Lexis Nexis and ChoicePoint, both owned by RELX PLC (OTC:RLXXF). She also held several senior leadership positions in the U.S. Government Departments of Defense, Justice, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs, including the Under Secretary of the U.S. Air Force, a Senate confirmed position. The Board believes that her qualifications to serve on the Board include her business strategy, corporate governance and cyber security expertise, as well as her public company and senior leadership experience in both the public and private sectors.

N/A

Mike Faith

55

Mr. Faith has served as a Director of the Company since April 2011. Mr. Faith is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Headsets.com in San Francisco, California since 1997. On March 9, 2020, Mike Faith notified the Board that he will not stand for re-election as a director at the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Faith’s decision to not stand for re-election was not due to any disagreement with the Company.

April 2011

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Role of the Board of Directors

In accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board. Although our non-employee directors are not involved in our day-to-day operating details, they are kept informed of our business through written reports and documents provided to them regularly, as well as by operating, financial and other reports presented by our officers at meetings of the Board and committees of the Board.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes it is currently appropriate to separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chair of our Board (“Board Chair”) as a result of the demands of and differences between each role. Jeffrey Geygan serves as the Board Chair. Effective with his appointment in January 2020, Dale Foster serves as our CEO and as a member of our Board. Our Board believes that this leadership structure provides the most efficient and effective leadership model for our

4


Table of Contents

Executive OfficersCompany by enhancing the ability of the CompanyBoard Chair and CEO to provide clear insight and direction of business strategies and plans to both the Board and management. Separating the CEO and Board Chair roles allows us to efficiently develop and implement corporate strategy that is consistent with the Board’s oversight role, while facilitating strong day-to-day leadership.

The duties and responsibilities of our Board Chair include: (i) chairing Board meetings, including presiding over all executive sessions of the Board (without management present) at every regularly scheduled Board meeting; (ii) consulting with the CEO on such other matters as are pertinent to the Board and the Company; (iii) working with management to determine the information and materials provided to Board members; (iv) approving Board meeting schedules, agenda and other information provided to the Board; (v) the authority to call meetings of the independent directors; (vi) serving as principal liaison between the independent directors and the CEO and between the independent directors and senior management; and (vii) being available for direct communication and consultation with stockholders upon request. Our CEO is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company, with guidance from the Board. The CEO is also responsible for the day-to- day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Board Chair provides guidance to the CEO, sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board.

Another key component of our leadership structure is our strong governance practices designed to ensure that the Board effectively carries out its responsibility for the oversight of management. All of our directors except Mr. Foster are independent, and all Board committees are comprised entirely of independent directors. Our independent directors meet at each Board meeting in regularly scheduled executive sessions (not less than twice per year) and may schedule additional executive sessions as appropriate. Members of management do not attend these executive sessions. The Board has full access to the management team at all times. In addition, the Board or any committee thereof may retain, on such terms as determined by the Board or such committee, as applicable, in its sole discretion, independent legal, financial and other consultants and advisors to assist the Board or committee, as applicable, in discharging its oversight responsibilities.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Our Board believes that overseeing how management manages the various risks we face is one of its most important responsibilities to the Company’s stakeholders. The Board believes that, in light of the interrelated nature of the Company’s risks, oversight of risk management is the responsibility of the full Board. In carrying out this critical duty, the Board meets at least annually with key members of management holding primary responsibility for management of risk in their respective areas. The Risk and Security Committee, established by the Board in February 2020, assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities with regard to the Company’s risk management framework and management’s identification, assessment and management of the Company’s key strategic, enterprise and other risks. Additionally, the Audit Committee has certain oversight functions, including discussing with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and steps that management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board met ten times in 2019. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of all meetings held by the Board and meetings of each committee of the Board on which such director served during 2019.

Communication with the Board of Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Stockholders may communicate with a member or members of the Board by addressing their correspondence to the Board member or members c/o the Corporate Secretary, Wayside Technology Group, Inc., 4 Industrial Way West, 3rd Floor, Eatontown, New Jersey 07724. Our Corporate Secretary will review the correspondence and forward it to the chair of the appropriate committee or to any individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed, unless the communication is unduly hostile, threatening and illegal, does not reasonably relate to the Company or our business, or is similarly inappropriate. Our Corporate Secretary has the authority to discard or disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.

5


Recognizing that director attendance at our annual meetings can provide our stockholders with a valuable opportunity to communicate with Board members about issues affecting our Company, we encourage our directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Messrs. McCarthy, Bryant, Crane and Foster were appointed to the Board subsequent to last year’s annual meeting. All of the directors then serving on the Board attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that the following directors are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards: Messrs. Faith, Geygan, McCarthy, Bryant and Crane and Ms. Kurty. The Board has also determined that Ms. DiBattiste, a director nominee not currently serving on the Board, would be considered independent under the NASDAQ listing standards if elected.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board has four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Risk and Security Committee (each, a “Committee” and collectively, the “Committees”).

During the past year, the composition of the Committees have been reorganized to better utilize the time and skills of each of our directors and focus on the important issues facing each Committee. The recent Board refreshment resulted in additional skills and talents being appointed to Committees where they are best utilized. Mr. Faith served as a member of the Audit Committee from June 2014 to the reorganization of committees in February 2020. Mr. Crane was appointed as a member of the Audit Committee on December 11, 2019. Ms. Kurty served as a member of the Compensation Committee from June 2016 to the reorganization of committees in February 2020. Mr. Geygan served as the Chair of the Compensation Committee from December 2018 to June 2019, and Mr. McCarthy has served as the Chair of the Compensation Committee since June 2019. Mr. Bryant was appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee on July 9, 2019, effective July 9, 2019. Ms. Kurty served as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from June 2016 to the reorganization of committees in February 2020. Mr. Faith served as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance committee from June 2012 until the reorganization of committees in February 2020. Mr. Geygan served as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from May 2018 to September 2019, and Mr. Bryant has served as the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since September 2019. The current members of each Committee are included below.

Audit Committee. The Board has an Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee: (i) monitors the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, financial reporting process and internal controls regarding finance, accounting and legal compliance; monitors the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm; (ii) provides an avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, and our outsourced internal auditors, and our Board; and (iii) monitors significant litigation and financial risk exposure. The current members of the Audit Committee are Ms. Kurty (Chair) and Messrs. Geygan and Crane, each of whom is independent as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules. The Board has determined that Ms. Kurty meets the criteria as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee met seven times during 2019.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of the charter is available on our website at http://www.waysidetechnology.com/ in the Committee Charters section under the Governance tab.

Compensation Committee. The Board has a Compensation Committee which: (i) reviews and monitors matters related to management development and succession; (ii) develops and implements executive compensation policies and pay for performance criteria for the Company; (iii) reviews and approves the initial and annual base salaries, annual incentive bonus and all long-term incentive awards of our Chief Executive Officer; (iv) reviews and approves such compensation arrangements for all executive officers and certain other key employees; (v) approves stock-related incentives under our stock incentive and executive compensation plans, and exercises all powers of the Board under those plans other than the power to amend or terminate those plans and other than those with respect to non-employee directors,

6


which determinations are subject to approval by the full Board; (vi) reviews and approves material matters concerning our employee compensation and benefit plans; and (vii) carries out such responsibilities as have been delegated to it under various compensation and benefit plans and such other responsibilities with respect to our compensation matters as may be referred to it by our Board or management. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees or, to the extent permitted under applicable laws, regulations and NASDAQ rules, to any other independent director, in each case to the extent the Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate. The Compensation Committee has the right to consult with or obtain input from management but, except as expressly provided in its charter, may not delegate any of its responsibilities to management. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. McCarthy (Chair), Bryant and Faith, each of whom is independent as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards. The Compensation Committee met one time during 2019.

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which is available on our website at http://www.waysidetechnology.com/ in the Committee Charters section under the Governance tab.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee which identifies individuals qualified to become Board members and recommends to the Board director nominees for election at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Currently, the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Bryant (Chair), Geygan and Faith, each of whom is independent as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met twice during 2019.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter is available in the Committee Charters section under the Governance tab of our website at http://www.waysidetechnology.com/.

Risk and Security Committee. The Board has a Risk and Security Committee which assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities with regard to the Company’s risk management framework and management’s identification, assessment and management of the Company’s key strategic, enterprise and other risks, including overseeing (i) the Company’s key strategic, enterprise and security risks, including, but not limited to, workplace and cybersecurity safety, (ii) privacy risk, including potential impact to the Company’s employees, customers and stakeholders, (iii) management’s implementation of risk policies and procedures, and (iv) the Company’s risk culture, i.e., the tone and culture within the Company regarding risk and the integration of risk management into the Company’s behaviors, decision making and processes. Currently, the members of the Risk and Security Committee are Messrs. Crane (Chair) and McCarthy and Ms. Kurty, each of whom is independent as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards. The Risk and Security Committee was established in February 2020. Mr. Crane has served as the Chair of the Risk and Security Committee since February 2020.

The Risk and Security Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The Risk and Security Committee charter is available in the Committee Charters section under the Governance tab of our website at http://www.waysidetechnology.com/.

Director Nominations

Nominees may be recommended by directors, members of management, or, in some cases, by a third-party firm. In identifying and considering candidates for nomination to the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, in addition to the requirements described below and set out in its charter, quality of experience, our needs and the range of knowledge, experience and diversity represented on the Board. Each director candidate will be evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee based on the same criteria and in the same manner, regardless of whether the candidate was recommended by a Company stockholder or by others. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will conduct the appropriate and necessary inquiries with respect to the backgrounds and qualifications of all director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also review the independence of each candidate and other qualifications of all director candidates, as well as consider questions of possible conflicts of interest between director nominees and our Company.

7


After the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has completed its review of a nominee’s qualifications and conducted the appropriate inquiries, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a determination whether to recommend the nominee for approval by the Board. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee decides to recommend the director nominee for approval by the Board and such recommendation is accepted by the Board, the form of our proxy solicitation will include the name of the director nominee.

In addition to the candidates nominated by the Board pursuant to the recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the manner set forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider recommendations for directorships submitted by our stockholders. Stockholders who wish the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider their recommendations for nominees for the position of director should submit their recommendations in writing to: Corporate Secretary, Wayside Technology Group, Inc., 4 Industrial Way West, 3rd Floor, Eatontown, New Jersey 07724.

In its assessment of each potential candidate, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review the nominee’s professional ethics, integrity and values, skills, judgment, experience, independence, commitment to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders, understanding of our Company’s or other related industries and such other factors as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines are pertinent in light of the current needs of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to identify candidates representing diverse experiences at policy-making levels in business, management, marketing, finance, human resources, communications and in other areas that are relevant to our activities. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also take into account the ability of a director to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities to our Company. After full consideration, the stockholder proponent will be notified of the decision of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Short-Selling, Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions

We do not permit our directors, executive officers or employees, or any of their designees, to speculate in Common Stock, which includes, without limitation, “short-selling” and/or buying publicly traded options. We also do not permit our directors, executives or employees, or any of their designees, to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise engage in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities (i) granted to the employee or director by the Company as part of his or her compensation or (ii) held, directly or indirectly, by the employee or director.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

In January 2004, we adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct, which was revised in December 2017. The full text of the Code of Ethical Conduct, as revised, which applies to all employees, officers and directors of the Company, including our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer is available at our website, http://www.waysidetechnology.com/site/content/code-of-ethics. The Company will disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethical Conduct that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller on our investor relations website.

Our Executives

Set forth below are the name, age, present title, principal occupation and certain biographical information for our executive officers as of February 1, 2018April 29, 2020, all of whom have been appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”).

our Board.

Name

    

Age

    

Name

Age

Position

Simon F. Nynens

46

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dale Foster

56 

54

Chief Executive Vice PresidentOfficer

Michael Vesey

58 

55

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Kevin ScullVito Legrottaglie

56 

52

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Vito Legrottaglie

53

VP of Operations and Chief Information Officer

Brian GilbertsonCharles Bass

55 

57

VP and General ManagerVice President of Alliances & Marketing, Lifeboat Distribution

Charles Bass

53

VP New Business Development

Simon F. Nynens8


Dale Foster was appointed our Chief Executive Officer and elected to our Board in January 2020. He previously held the positions of President of Lifeboat Distribution, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, from July 2019 to January 2020 and Executive Vice President of the Company from January 2018 to July 2019. From November 2012 until January 2018, Mr. Foster served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Promark, which operated as a subsidiary of Ingram Micro Inc. From 1997 until Promark was acquired by Ingram Micro Inc. in 2012, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2006.of Promark, a value-added distributor with the core focus of distributing emerging data storage and virtualization solutions. Mr. Nynens also serves on the Board of Directors and was named Chairman in June 2006. He previously held the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (June 2004 - January 2006) and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (January 2002 - June 2004). Prior to January 2002, Mr. Nynens served as the Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerFoster is a 1987 graduate of the Company’s European operations.

Dale Fosterwas appointed Executive Vice PresidentRochester Institute of Technology, where he earned a Bachelor’s of Technology in January 2018.Electrical Engineering. Mr. Foster Previously served as Executive Director and General Manager of Promark Technology Inc.also holds an Associate’s degree in Electrical Engineering from November 2012 until he joined the Company.   Prior to that he served as President and CEO of Promark prior to its acquisition by Ingram Micro.Alfred State University.

Michael Vesey was appointed Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in October 2016. He served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from June 6, 2019 to June 28, 2019. He served as Vice President of SEC Reporting for OTG Management, Inc., from January to September 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Vesey served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2011 to 2015, and Vice President Corporate Controller from 2006 to 2011, for Majesco Entertainment Company, a NASDAQ listed publisher and distributor of interactive entertainment software. Mr. Vesey is a certified public accountant and holds a Master of Finance degree from Penn State University. He began his career with the accounting firm KPMG.

Kevin Scull was appointed to the position of Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in February 2015, after having served as the Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer since February 2014. He previously held the position of Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from January 2006 to August 2012, after having served as Corporate Controller of the company since January 2003. Prior to joining Wayside Technology Group, Inc., Mr. Scull worked for Niksun Inc. as Accounting Manager from January 2001to January 2003 and, prior to that, he worked for Telcordia Inc. from December 2000 to January 2001, as Manager of Accounting Policies.

Vito Legrottaglie was appointed to the position of Vice President and Chief Information Officer in February 2015, after having served as Vice President of Operations and Information Systems since April 2007.June 2003. Mr. Legrottaglie rejoined the company in February 2003 having previously served as director of Information Systems and then vice presidentVice President of Information Systems from 1996-2000. Mr. Legrottaglie has also held the positions of chief technology officerChief Technology Officer at Swell Commerce Incorporated, vice presidentVice President of Operations for The Wine Enthusiast Companies, and directorDirector of Information Systems at Barnes and Noble. Mr. Legrottaglie holds an Associate’s Degree in Computer Science from Bergen Community College.

Charles Bass has served as Vice President of Alliances and Marketing at Lifeboat Distribution since January 2018. Prior to joining Lifeboat Distribution, he was the Vice President of Channel Sales at Blue Medora, an IT monitoring and integration company, from October 2016 to December 2017. Mr. Bass was the Vice President of Channel Sales at Tegile Systems, a high growth storage start-up that was acquired by Western Digital, from July 2015 to October 2016. Before joining Tegile Systems, he served as Promark Technology’s Vice President of Vendor Alliances and Marketing from November 2010 to July 2015. He joined the Board of Directors of Promark Technology in 2012 and was part of the management team that successfully executed Promark Technology’s acquisition by Ingram Micro in the fourth quarter of 2012. He also has experience at Hewlett Packard (NYSE: HPQ) and LeftHand Networks where he was responsible for channel sales in North America for StorageWorks and LeftHand Networks products respectively. Prior to Hewlett Packard and LeftHand Networks, he held various sales leadership positions at Brocade Communications Systems, McDATA Corporation, and IBM. Mr. Bass received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Vanderbilt University in 1987 and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Tennessee in 1990.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) under the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors and holders of more than ten percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and to furnish the Company with copies of these reports. Based solely upon a review of such reports, or on written representations from certain reporting persons that no reports were required for such persons, the Company believes that during 2019 all required events of its officers, directors and 10% stockholders required to be so reported, were timely filed except for (i) the late filing of a Form 3 for John McCarthy, due to delays in receipt of EDGAR codes, (ii) the inadvertent late filing of a Form 3 for Dale Foster, (iii) the inadvertent late filing of a Form 3 for Charles Bass, and (iv) the inadvertent late filing of a Form 5 for Michael Vesey, which included an aggregate of twelve small acquisitions eligible for deferred reporting pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 16a-6 that should have been filed on Form 5s for 2017, 2018, and 2019.

9


Item 11. Executive Compensation

Director Compensation and Arrangements

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation earned by or awarded to each director, who is not a named executive officer who served on the Board, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

    

Fees
Earned or
Paid In

    

Stock

    

    

 

Name

Cash ($)

Awards ($) (1)

Total ($)

Mike Faith

63,750 

28,200 

91,950 

Diana Kurty

80,000 

28,200 

108,200 

Jeffrey Geygan

106,667 

28,200 

134,867 

John McCarthy

43,750 

28,200 

71,950 

Andy Bryant

33,333 

28,200 

61,533 

Ross Crane

5,000 

— 

5,000 


(1)The amount included in “Stock Awards” is the aggregate grant date fair value associated with restricted stock awards granted to our outside directors in 2019, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The restricted stock awards vested in full on the date of grant. See Note 8, “Stockholder’s Equity and Stock Based Compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the assumptions made in determining stock award values.

During 2019, each outside director (i.e., non-employee) received $15,000 per quarter for serving on the Board (except for the Board Chair who received $25,000 per quarter), as well as reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with services as a director. The Chair of the Audit Committee received an annual fee of $20,000. The Chair of the Compensation Committee received an annual fee of $15,000. The Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an annual fee of $10,000. Steve DeWindt, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, served as a director until his resignation effective June 6, 2019, as President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board. Mr. DeWindt received no fees for serving on the Board while also serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, on August 6, 2019 each outside director received a grant of 2,500 shares of restricted stock, which vested in full on the date of grant.

Effective February 2020, Board compensation was adjusted such that the Chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $25,000, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000 and the Chair of the newly established Risk and Security Committee receives an annual fee of $20,000. The Chair of the Compensation Committee will continue to receive an annual fee of $15,000.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview and Named Executive Officers

The Company qualifies under SEC rules as a smaller reporting company (“SRC”). As such, the Company may elect to omit certain disclosures that are not required under the reporting requirements for SRCs. The Company, however, optionally included the Compensation Discussion and Analysis herein to provide more fulsome disclosure of changes made to its compensation practices in recent years. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis identifies the elements of

10


compensation and explains the compensation objectives and practices for the Company’s named executive officers. The Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 are:

Name

Principal Position

Dale Foster

Chief Executive Officer and former President of Lifeboat

Steve DeWindt

Former Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Michael Vesey

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Vito Legrottagglie

Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Brian Gilbertson

Former Vice President and General Manager, Lifeboat

Charles Bass

Vice President - New Business Development

The Compensation Committee is charged with the responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence to the Company’s compensation philosophy and ensuring that executives and key management personnel are appropriately compensated. The Compensation Committee also is responsible for reviewing and establishing the compensation of directors. The Compensation Committee generally meets annually to re-evaluate appropriate level of base compensation and incentive compensation for our executive officers.

BrianCompensation Philosophy and Objectives. The Compensation Committee seeks to structure each element of compensation to attract and retain the necessary executive talent, reward annual performance and provide incentives for both long-term strategic goal planning and achievement as well as short-term performance. The Compensation Committee’s policy for allocating between currently paid and long-term compensation is to ensure adequate base compensation to attract and retain personnel, while providing incentives to maximize long-term value for our stockholders.

Elements of Compensation. The total compensation program for the Company’s executive officers consists of the following:

Salary;
Cash incentive and bonus awards tied to the Company and each executive’s annual performance;
Equity incentive awards; and
Termination benefits.

Say On Pay Considerations and Say on Frequency Results. In accordance with SEC rules, the Company conducted a non-binding, advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation at its 2019 and 2018 annual meetings of stockholders. In 2018 the Company’s named executive officer compensation was approved with a favorable vote of 72%. In 2018, the Company reviewed its executive compensation practices, considering input from stockholders and results of proxy advisory service recommendations. As a result of that review and in light of market standards for good governance, the Company implemented the following changes to its executive compensation programs for 2019 and going forward.

Re-evaluated criteria for annual executive bonuses and, in order to more closely tie pay to performance, added a gross profit growth criterion to annual targets;
Amended the definition of a “change in control” for future grants under the 2012 Plan, to require consummation of a transaction rather than mere stockholder approval, and to make certain other changes (see Severance and Change in Control Agreements);

At the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s stockholders voted to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation with a favorable vote of 81% of the votes cast. Additionally, our stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, every year as the frequency of future advisory votes on our named executive officer compensation, with over 90% of the votes cast in favor of annual advisory votes.

11


Base Salary and Performance Cash Bonus Plan.

Total cash compensation for 2019 is divided into a base salary portion and a bonus. Many factors are considered in determining the base salaries for executive officers, including the value that each individual brings to the Company through experience, education and training, comparable positions and comparable responsibilities at similar organizations, the specific needs of the Company, and the individual’s past and expected future contributions to the Company’s success. Compensation for our executives includes both fixed and performance-based components, with an emphasis on performance-based elements to support the objectives listed below. The Company considers a component to be performance-based if the amount eventually earned or paid varies based on one or more elements of the Company’s financial performance (e.g., profit margins, operating income, etc.). Performance-based components are designed so that above-plan performance is rewarded with above-target payouts and vice versa.

After reviewing the base salaries of executive officers and upon recommendation by the Compensation Committee, on February 13, 2019, the Board approved adjustments to the annualized base salary for each named executive officer included in the table below to better align their compensation with the roles, responsibilities and expected operational activities. Mr. Foster’s annualized base salary was increased in January 2020 in connection with his engagement as our Chief Executive Officer, and such increase is discussed in more detail below under Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Vesey’s base salary was increased in connection with the re-alignment of his responsibilities with the Company and his contribution to the financial development of the Company. Mr. Legrottaglie’s base salary was increased in connection with the re-alignment of his responsibilities within the Company and his contributions to the technology, safety and cybersecurity development of the Company. The table below reflects these increases. Mr. Vesey’s base salary was reduced to $275,000 and Mr. Legrottaglie’s base salary was reduced to $225,000 effective January 31, 2020.

    

Base Salary
as of

    

Base Salary
as of

    

Percent of

 

Name

12/31/2018

12/31/2019

Increase

Dale Foster

$

250,000 

$

250,000 

— 

%

Michael Vesey

$

225,000 

$

300,000 

33 

%

Vito Legrottaglie

$

225,000 

$

250,000 

10 

%

Charles Bass

$

250,000 

$

250,000 

— 

%

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a performance bonus plan for 2019 (the “Performance Bonus Plan”) which was developed using the performance metrics approved by stockholder vote under the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan (the “Executive Plan”). Cash incentive payments under the Performance Bonus Plan depend upon the Company’s financial performance as measured by a variety of metrics included gross profit, operating profit, new business development and other metrics designed to improve profitability and earnings and actual annual performance having met or exceeded thresholds set in the Performance Bonus Plan.

Pursuant to the Performance Bonus Plan, which replaced the Executive Plan, the Company’s executive officers are eligible to receive cash incentive payments dependent on the same Company metrics listed above or the executive meeting or exceeding, in a specified performance period, pre-established, objectively determinable performance goals. Under the Performance Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee establishes the performance goals and the performance period at a time when the attainment of the applicable performance goals is substantially uncertain. The Compensation Committee established performance goals based on the metrics established in the Executive Plan for the Company’s 2019 fiscal year in February 2019. Because payments of cash awards under the Performance Bonus Plan would be determined by comparing actual performance to the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee, in accordance with criteria provided for in the Executive Plan, it is not possible to predict the amount of future benefits that will be paid under the Performance Bonus Plan for any future performance period. However, the maximum award an executive officer could receive under the Performance Bonus Plan for fiscal year 2019 was $380,000.

The principal targets in the Company’s 2019 performance bonus plan were gross profit, operating income, and new vendor development. Specific targets for each executive officer were determined by the Compensation Committee based on a review of the Company’s 2019 budget prepared by management and the factors described above. The targets

12


are set at levels that, upon achievement of 100% of the target performance, are likely to result in bonus payments that the Compensation Committee believes reflects the Company’s strategic plan designed to increase stockholder value. The following table shows, for fiscal year 2019, the potential range of bonus awards and the actual bonus awarded as a percentage of base salary, for each of the named executive officers who remained employed with the Company as of December 31, 2019. Bonuses for Messrs. Vesey and Legrottaglie are based on consolidated gross profit and operating income. Bonuses for Mr. Foster are based on the Lifeboat segment gross profit and the Lifeboat segment operating income and TechXtend segment operating income. Bonuses for Mr. Bass are based on the gross profit generated from new vendors within the Lifeboat segment and the Lifeboat segment operating income. The cash bonus paid to each named executive officer may not exceed their base salary.

    

2019 Gross

    

2019 Gross

    

2019 Operating

    

2019 Operating

    

2019 Cash

 

Profit

Profit

Income

Income

Bonus Total

Potential

Actual

Potential

Actual

Actual

Name

Payouts

Payouts

Payouts

Payouts

Payouts

Dale Foster

0-100 

%  

17 

%  

0-100 

%  

32 

%  

49 

%

Michael Vesey

0-100 

%  

%  

0-100 

%  

23 

%  

32 

%

Vito Legrottaglie

0-100 

%  

12 

%  

0-100 

%  

43 

%  

55 

%

Charles Bass

0-100 

%  

28 

%  

0-100 

%  

11 

%  

39 

%

Equity Incentive.

The Company’s executive officers are eligible to receive equity incentive awards under the Company’s equity incentive plan. The primary goal of the Company is to create long-term value for stockholders, and accordingly the Compensation Committee believes that equity incentive awards provide an additional incentive to executive officers to work towards maximizing stockholder value. The Compensation Committee views equity incentive awards as one of the more important components of the Company’s long-term, performance-based compensation philosophy. The grant of equity incentive awards to executive officers encourages equity ownership in the Company, and closely aligns executive officers’ interests to the interests of the stockholders.

Equity incentive awards may be provided through initial grants at or near the date of hire, through subsequent periodic grants and annual performance-based grants. Equity incentive awards granted by the Company to its executive officers and other employees have exercise prices not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant or award. Equity incentive awards vest and become exercisable at such time as determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee. The initial grant is designed for the level of skills required to fulfill the executive’s responsibilities and is designed to motivate the officer to make the kind of decisions and implement strategies and programs that will contribute to an increase in the Company’s stock price over time. Periodic additional equity incentive awards within the comparable range for the job are granted to reflect the executive’s ongoing contributions to the Company, to create an incentive to remain at the Company and to provide a long-term incentive to achieve or exceed the Company’s financial goals. Annual performance-based grants, if awarded, are based on the achievement of gross profit, operating profit and other performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee.

Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements. As stated above, the Compensation Committee believes that the interests of stockholders are best served by ensuring that the interests of our senior management are aligned with those of our stockholders. We believe that companies should provide reasonable severance benefits to executive officers due to the greater level of difficulty they face in finding comparable employment in a short period of time and greater risk of job loss or modification as a result of a change-in-control transaction than other employees. By reducing the risk of job loss or reduction in authority, the change-in-control provision helps ensure that our executive officers support potential change-in-control transactions that may be in the best interests of our stockholders, even though the transaction may create uncertainty in their personal employment situation, and such a provision is necessary, we believe, to ensuring that our total employment package for executives remains market competitive. Certain named executive officers are entitled to receive severance benefits under the terms of his or her individually negotiated employment agreement upon either termination by us without cause or, under certain circumstances for certain of our named executive officers, resignation by the executive for good reason. Other executive officers are entitled to receive accelerated vesting of their outstanding equity awards according to the terms of our 2012 Plan. For additional details on our severance and change-in-control arrangements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

13


Severance and change in control arrangements consist of cash payments, accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards, and benefits continuation. Based on a review of market standards for good governance, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s 2012 Plan and has made changes to the definition of a change in control, as outlined below, effective April 2019, which will be applicable to all future grants. The changes were made to bring such provisions in line with current market practice for good governance. The Compensation Committee may make further modifications to the plans as necessary. Changes to the 2012 Plan include the following:

The Company amended the 2012 Plan to require consummation of a change in control rather than mere stockholder approval of a transaction in order to trigger the change in control provisions, and to make certain other changes.

Change in Control. For purposes of the 2012 Plan, as most recently amended in April 2019, “Change in Control” means:

The acquisition of more than 50% beneficial ownership of the combined voting stock of the Company by any person or group other than the Company or its subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan of the Company or any person who was an officer or director of the Company on the effective date of the 2012 Plan;
Consummation by the Company of a reorganization, merger or consolidation in which all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners of the voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, following such reorganization, merger or consolidation, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, securities representing more than 50% of the voting power of then outstanding voting securities of the corporation resulting from such a reorganization, merger or consolidation, unless the transaction is structured as “merger of equals” and the Board determines that a change in control has not occurred;
The sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to a party which is not controlled by or under common control with the Company; or
During any 24 month period, individuals who, as of the beginning of such period, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, except that individuals whose election or nomination was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (other than in connection with an actual or threatened election contest) are treated as Incumbent Directors. A summary of the effects of the revised change in control provisions are below.

DeWindt and Gilbertson Resignations.

Both Mr. DeWindt and Mr. Gilbertson received separation payments in connection with their respective resignations during 2019. On May 24, 2019 the Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (the “DeWindt Separation Agreement”) with Mr. DeWindt in connection with his resignation as President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board effective June 6, 2019. The DeWindt Separation Agreement supersedes and replaces the Employment Agreement, dated October 5, 2018, between Mr. DeWindt and the Company. Under the DeWindt Separation Agreement, Mr. DeWindt was appointedentitled to receive a cash payment of $100,000, payable in six equal monthly installments, all of which were paid as of December 31, 2019. The Company satisfied and retired all contractual obligations owed to Mr. DeWindt regarding possible termination benefits.

On July 25, 2019, the Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (the “Gilbertson Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Gilbertson in connection with his resignation as Vice President and General Manager of Lifeboat Distribution (“Lifeboat”), a subsidiary of Wayside Technology Group, Inc., in May 2016.effective July 31, 2019. The Gilbertson Separation Agreement supersedes and replaces all previous letter agreements between Mr. Gilbertson joined Lifeboat in 2015 as Vice President, Business Development.  Since 2003,and the Company related to his employment. Under the Gilbertson Separation Agreement, Mr. Gilbertson has held leadership positionswas entitled to receive a cash payment of $125,000, payable semi-monthly in distribution and high-tech vendor companies.  Prior to joining Lifeboat, Mr. Gilbertson served asaccordance with the Senior DirectorCompany’s regularly scheduled payroll practices for Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions from November 2006 to February 2015.  While at Arrow, Mr. Gilbertson had responsibility fora period of six months following the P&L,separation date.

514


Table of ContentsOther Employee Benefits

developmentThe Company provides all employees, including executive officers, with group medical, dental and execution of strategic direction, and day to day operations.  Prior to Arrow, he serveddisability insurance on a non-discriminatory basis. The employee group as the Director of Sales for Alternative Technology July 2003 to November 2006. 

Charles Bass was appointed Vice President New Business Development, in January 2018.  Mr. Bass previously served as Vice President Worldwide Channel Sales at Blue Medora since October 2016 until he joined the Company. From August 2015 to October 2016 he served as Vice President Worldwide sales for Tegile Inc., and from November 2010 to August 2015 he served as Vice President, Alliances, Marketing and Western Sales for Promark Technology Inc.

Available Information

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Companya whole is required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information withcontribute approximately 20% of the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room.  The SEC maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.premium costs of such policies. The Company files electronically with the SEC. The Company makes available, free of charge, through its internet web site, its reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Qhas a 401(k) savings and 8-K, and amendmentsinvestment plan intended to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with the SEC. The following address for the Company’s web site includes a hyperlink to those reportsqualify under “Financials/SEC Filings”: http://www.waysidetechnology.com.

In  December 2017, we adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct. The full textSection 401(a) of the Code, of Ethical Conduct,for our domestic employees, which appliespermits employee salary reductions for tax-deferred savings purposes pursuant to all employees, officers and directorsSection 401(k) of the Code. The Company including ourmatches 50% of domestic employee contributions up to the first 6% of compensation. The Company’s total contributions for 2019 were approximately $262,000.

Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer

The factors considered by the Compensation Committee in determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, is available at our web site, http://www.waysidetechnology.com, under “Governance.” The Company intends to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethical Conduct that applies to its Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer on its web site under “Investor Information.”

Referencein addition to the “uniform resource locators” or “URLs” contained in this section is made as an inactive textual reference for informational purposes only. Information on our web sites should not be considered filed withcriteria discussed above, include the SecuritiesCompany’s operating and Exchange Commission, and is not, and should not be deemed to be part of this report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investors should carefully consider the risk factors set forth belowfinancial performance, as well as the other information contained in this report. Anyindividual’s leadership and establishment and implementation of the following risks could materiallystrategic direction for the Company. The Compensation Committee considered as part of its subjective evaluation, among other factors, such executive’s reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those currently viewed by us to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Changescontacts in the information technology industry and/or economic environment may reduce demand for the products and services we sell. Our results of operations are influenced by a variety of factors, including the conditionbusiness community. The compensation of the IT industry, general economic conditions, shiftsCompany’s Chief Executive Officer in demand2019 consisted of a base salary performance bonus and stock awards. The total compensation package was established considering compensation of peer chief executive officers with similar executive responsibilities. In May 2019, Steve DeWindt resigned as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer effective June 6, 2019. Mr. Vesey served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from June 6, 2019 to June 28, 2019. Mr. Foster was appointed President of Lifeboat Distribution, reporting directly to the Board effective July 1, 2019. Mr. Vesey served as the Principal Executive Officer of the Company from June 6, 2019 to January 15, 2020. Mr. Foster was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective January 20, 2020.

In connection with his appointment, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Foster. Mr. Foster is employed by the Company on an at-will basis and, therefore, either Mr. Foster or the Company may terminate Mr. Foster’s employment at any time for or availabilityany reason not prohibited by law. Mr. Foster’s current base salary is $325,000 per annum.

Mr. Foster is eligible to earn a cash bonus and equity compensation in amounts consistent with the annual compensation plan as adopted by the Compensation Committee of computer productsthe Board.

Risk Assessment and softwareMitigation Related to Compensation Policies

The Board has reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to our employees and IT servicesbelieves that our policies do not encourage excessive and industry introductionsunnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of new products, upgrades or methods of distribution. The information technology products industryrisk that they do encourage is characterized by abrupt changes in technology, rapid changes in customer preferences, short product life cycles and evolving industry standards. Net sales can be dependent on demand for specific product categories, and any change in demand for or supply of such products couldnot reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our net sales, and/or cause us to record write-downs of obsolete inventory, if we fail to react in a timely manner to such changes.

We rely on our suppliers for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing incentives and competitive products to sell. We acquire products for resale both directly from manufacturers and indirectly from distributors. The loss of a supplier could cause a disruption in the availability of products. Additionally, there is no assurance that as manufacturers continue to or increasingly sell directly to end users and through the distribution channel, that they will not limit or curtail the availability of their products to distributors/resellers like us. For example, resellers and publishers may attempt to increase the volume of software products distributed electronically through ESD (Electronic Software

6


Distribution) technology, through subscription services, and through on-line shopping services, and correspondingly, decrease the volume of products sold through us. Our inabilitymanagement team regularly assesses the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices. The team reviews and discusses the design features, characteristics, performance metrics at the company and segment levels and approval mechanisms of total compensation for all employees, including salaries, incentive plans, and equity-based compensation awards, to obtain a sufficient quantitydetermine whether any of products,these policies or an allocation of products from a manufacturer in a wayprograms could create risks that favors one of our competitors, or competing distribution channels, relativeare reasonably likely to us, could cause us to be unable to fill clients’ orders in a timely manner, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operationsus.

The Company’s compensation policies and financial condition. We also rely on our supplierspractices for its employees, including its executive compensation program described in Compensation Discussion and Analysis, aim to provide funds for us to market their products, including through our on-line marketing efforts, and to provide purchasing incentives to us.  If any of the suppliers that have historically provided these benefits to us decides to reduce such benefits, our expenses would increase, adversely affecting our results of operations.

General economic weakness may reduce our revenues and profits.   Generally, economic downturns, may cause some of our current and potential customers to delay or reduce technology purchases, resulting in longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. We may, therefore, experience a greater decline in demand for the products we sell, resulting in increased competition and pressure to reduce the cost of operations. Any benefits from cost reductions may take longer to realize and may not fully mitigate the impact of the reduced demand. In addition, weak financial and credit markets heighten the risk of customer bankruptcies and create a corresponding delay in collecting receivables from those customers and may also affect our vendors’ ability to supply products,risk-balanced compensation package which could disrupt our operations.  The realization of any or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We depend on having creditworthy customers to avoid an adverse impact to our operating results and financial condition.  We may require sufficient amounts of debt and/or equity capital to fund our transactions as we provide larger extended payment terms to certain of our customers. If the credit quality of our customer base materially decreases, or if we experience a material increaseis competitive in our credit losses, we may find it difficultmarket sectors and relevant to the individual executive. The Company expects to continue to obtainaward to certain executives and employees, upon satisfaction of applicable performance conditions and subject to future approval and grant by the required capital for our business,Compensation Committee, equity and our operating results and financial condition may be harmed. In addition tocash-based awards. Because the impact on our ability to attract capital, a material increase in our delinquency and default experience would itself have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, if any of our customers to whom we provide larger extended payment terms go elsewhere for financing, such loss of revenue could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The IT products and services industry is intensely competitive and actions of competitors, including manufacturers of products we sell, can negatively affect our business. Competition has been based primarily on price, product availability, speed of delivery, credit availability and quality and breadth of product lines and, increasingly, also is based on the ability to tailor specific solutions to client needs. We compete with manufacturers, including manufacturers of products we sell, as well as a large number and wide variety of marketers and resellers of IT products and services. In addition, manufacturers are increasing the volume of software products they distribute electronically directly to end-users and in the future, will likely pay lower referral fees for sales of certain software licensing agreements sold by us.  Generally, pricing is very aggressive in the industry, and we expect pricing pressures to continue. There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate prices as favorable as those negotiated by our competitors or that we will be able to offset the effects of price reductions with an increase in the number of clients, higher net sales, cost reductions, or greater sales of services, which service sales typically at higher gross margins, or otherwise. Price reductions by our competitors that we either cannot or choose not to match could result in an erosion of our market share and/or reduced sales or, to the extent we match such reductions, could result in reduced operating margins, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We operate on narrow margins. We operate in a very competitive business environment. Like other companies in the technology distribution industry, the Company’s business is continually under pricing pressure and characterized by narrow gross and operating margins. These narrow margins magnify the impact on the Company’s operating results attributed to variations in sales and operating costs and place a premium on our ability to leverage our infrastructure. Future gross and operating margins may be adversely affected by changes in product mix, vendor pricing actions and competitive and economic pressures. In addition, failure to attract new sources of business from expansion of products or services or entry into new markets may adversely affect future gross and operating margins.

If we lose several of our larger customers our earnings may be affected. Meeting our customers’ needs quickly and fairly is critical to our business success. Our contracts for the provision of products are generally non-

7


exclusive agreements that are terminable by either party upon 30 days’ notice. In addition, our agreements with these larger customers do notincentive plans provide for minimum purchase commitments.a blend of short-term and long-term goals, and include substantial vesting features, the Company believes that the structure of its compensation plans discourages short-term risk taking and aligns the interest of its executives and managers with those of its stockholders. The loss of several of our large customers, the failure of such customers to pay their accounts receivable on a timely basis, or a material reduction in the amount of purchases made by such customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, anything that negatively impacts our customer relations also can negatively impact our operating results.

Disruptions in our information technology and voice and data networks could affect our ability to service our clients and cause us to incur additional expenses. WeCompany does not believe that our success to date has been,risks arising from these practices, or its compensation policies and future results of operations likely will be, dependent in large part upon our ability to provide prompt and efficient service to clients. Our ability to provide such services is dependent largely on the accuracy, quality and utilization of the information generated by our IT systems, which affect our ability to manage our sales, client service, distribution, inventories and accounting systems and the reliability of our voice and data networks.

Failure to adequately maintain the security of our electronic and other confidential information could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.  We are dependent upon automated information technology processes. Privacy, security, and compliance concerns have continued to increase as technology has evolved to facilitate commerce and as cross-border commerce increases. As part of our normal business activities, we collect and store certain confidential information, including personal information of employees and information about partners and clients which may be entitled to protection under a number of regulatory regimes. In the course of normal and customary business practice, we may share some of this information with vendors who assist us with certain aspects of our business. Moreover, the success of our operations depends upon the secure transmission of confidential and personal data over public networks, including the use of cashless payments. Any failure on the part of us or our vendors to maintain the security of data we are required to protect, including via the penetration of our network security and the misappropriation of confidential and personal information, could result in business disruption, damage to our reputation, financial obligations to third parties, fines, penalties, regulatory proceedings and private litigation with potentially large costs, and also result in deterioration in our employees’, partners’ and clients’ confidence in us and other competitive disadvantages, and thus could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  During 2017 and 2016 we did not have any cybersecurity breaches.

We depend on certain key personnel. Our future success will be largely dependent on the efforts of key management personnel for strategic and operational guidance as well as relationships with our key vendors and customers. We also believe that our future success will be largely dependent on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified management, sales, service, finance and technical personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain such personnel. Further, we make a significant investment in the training of our sales account executives. Our inability to retain such personnel or to train them either rapidly enough to meet our expanding needs or in an effective manner for quickly changing market conditions could cause a decrease in the overall quality and efficiency of our sales staff, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks related to our common stock. The exercise of options or any other issuance of shares by us may dilute your ownership of our Common Stock. Our Common Stock is thinly traded, which may be exacerbated by our repurchases of our Common Stock. As a result of the thin trading market for our stock, its market price may fluctuate significantly more than the stock marketpractices considered as a whole, or of the stock prices of similar companies.  Without a larger float, our common stock will be less liquid than the stock of companies with broader public ownership, and, as a result, the trading prices for our Common Stock may be more volatile. Among other things, trading of a relatively small volume of our Common Stock may have a greater impact on the trading price of our stock than would be the case if our public float were larger.

Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market, and we therefore are subjectreasonably likely to continued listing requirements, including requirements with respect to the market value and number of publicly-held shares, number of stockholders, minimum bid price, number of market makers and either (i) stockholders’ equity or (ii) total market value of stock, total assets and total revenues. If we fail to satisfy one or more of the requirements, we may be delisted from The NASDAQ Global Market. If we do not qualify for listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market, and if we are not able

8


to list our common stock on another exchange, our common stock could be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or on the “pink sheets”. As a result, we could face significant adverse consequences including, among others, a limited availability of market quotations for our securities and a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

If the Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discovers material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting, it may not be able to report its financial results accurately or timely or detect fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on its business. An effective internal control environment is necessary for the Company to produce reliable financial reports and is an important part of its effort to prevent financial fraud. The Company is required to annually evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of its internal controls over financial reporting. Based on these evaluations, the Company may conclude that enhancements, modifications, or changes to internal controls are necessary or desirable. During 2017, the Company determined it had a material weakness in its internal controls as is reported in Item 9a., Controls and Procedures. While management evaluates the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls on a regular basis, these controls may not always be effective. There are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls, including collusion, management override, and failure in human judgment. In addition, control procedures are designed to reduce rather than eliminate financial statement risk. If the Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, or if management or the Company's independent registered public accounting firm discovers material weaknesses in the Company's internal controls, it may be unable to produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business. In addition, the Company may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, suchCompany.

15


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mike Faith, Diana Kurty, Jeffrey Geygan, John McCarthy, Andy Bryant, and Ross Crane served as the SEC or the NASDAQ. Any such actions could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliabilitymembers of the Company's financial statements, which could causeCompensation Committee during the market pricelast completed fiscal year. None of its common stock to declineMessrs. Faith, Geygan, McCarthy, Bryant, Crane, or limitMs. Kurty (i) was, during the Company's access to capital.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements. As described under Item 9a., Controls and Procedures, we have identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control. Under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a material weakness is a deficiency,last completed fiscal year, an officer or a combinationemployee of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We have initiated remediation measures, but these new and enhanced controls have not operated for a sufficient amount of time to conclude that the material weakness has been remediated. To implement these remediation measures, we may need to commit additional resources, hire additional staff, and provide additional management oversight. These activities may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Further, if our remediation measures are insufficient to address the material weakness, or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements, and we could be required to restate our financial results. In addition, if we are unable to successfully remediate this material weakness and if we are unable to produce accurate and timely financial statements, our stock price may be adversely affected and we may be unable to maintain compliance with applicable stock exchange listing requirements.

The Company may be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require payment of damages or licensing fees and could limit the company's ability to use certain technologies in the future. Certain of the Company's products and services include intellectual property owned primarily by the company's  

third- party suppliers. Substantial litigation and threats of litigation regarding intellectual property rights exist in the software and some service industries. From time to time, third parties (including certain companies in the business of acquiring patents not for the purpose of developing technology but with the intention of aggressively seeking licensing revenue from purported infringers) may assert patent, copyright and/or other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to the company's business. In some cases, depending on the nature of the claim, the company may be able to seek indemnification from its suppliers for itself and its customers against such claims, but there is no assurance

9


that it will be successful in obtaining such indemnification or that the company is fully protected against such claims. Any infringement claim brought against the company, regardless of the duration, outcome, or size of damage award, could:

·

result in substantial cost to the company;

·

divert management's attention and resources;

·

be time consuming to defend;

·

result in substantial damage awards; or

·

cause product shipment delays.

Additionally, if an infringement claim is successful the company may be required to pay damages or seek royalty or license arrangements, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. The payment of any such damages or royalties may significantly increase the company's operating expenses and harm the company's operating results and financial condition. Also, royalty or license arrangements may not be available at all. The company may have to stop selling certain products or using technologies, which could affect the company's ability to compete effectively.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

The Company leases approximately 20,000 square feet of space in Eatontown, New Jersey for its corporate headquarters under a lease expiring in March 2027.  Total annual rent expense for these premises is approximately $420,000. The Company also leases 7,800 square feet of warehouse space in Eatontown, New Jersey under a lease expiring in October 2020. Total annual rent expense is approximately $44,000.   The Company also leases 2,800 square feet of office space in Mesa, Arizona under a lease expiring in August 2018. Total annual rent expense is approximately $55,000.  Additionally, the Company leases approximately 3,700 square feet of office and warehouse space in Mississauga, Canada, under a lease which expires in November 30, 2019. Total annual rent expense for these premises is approximately $30,000.  The Company also leases office space in Amsterdam, Netherlands under a lease which expires June 30, 2018, at an annual rent of approximately $34,000. We believe that each of the properties is in good operating condition and such properties are adequate for the operation of the Company’s business as currently conducted.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

There are no material legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries, is a party(ii) was formerly an officer of the Company or of which any of their property isits subsidiaries, or (iii) had any relationship requiring disclosure by the subject.Company under any paragraph of Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Furthermore, no executive officer and no member of the Committee had a relationship that requires disclosure under Item 407(e)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

10


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.01, trade on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “WSTG”.  Following is the range of low and high closing sales prices for our Common Stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Market.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

High

    

Low

 

2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

18.85

 

$

16.60

 

Second Quarter

 

$

20.95

 

$

18.25

 

Third Quarter

 

$

19.35

 

$

13.35

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

17.10

 

$

13.40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

19.38

 

$

15.98

 

Second Quarter

 

$

18.94

 

$

16.50

 

Third Quarter

 

$

18.50

 

$

16.76

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

18.87

 

$

16.70

 

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2017, regarding securities authorized for issuance uponCompensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock under all of the Company’s equity compensation plans.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

(a)

    

(b)

    

 

 

 

 

Number of Securities to

 

Weighted

 

(c)

 

 

 

be Issued Upon Exercise

 

Average

 

Number of Securities Remaining Available

 

 

 

of Outstanding Options

 

Exercise Price

 

for Future Issuance Under Equity

 

 

 

and Vesting of Stock

 

of Outstanding

 

Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities

 

Plan Category

 

Awards

 

Options

 

Reflected in Column (a))

 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders (1)

 

161,818

 

$

15.98

 

245,846

 

Total

 

161,818

 

$

15.98

 

245,846

 


(1)

Includes the 2006 Plan and the 2012 Plan. For plan details, please refer to Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In each of 2017 and 2016, we declared quarterly dividends totaling $0.68 per share, respectively, on our Common Stock. There can be no assurance that we will continue to pay comparable cash dividends in the future.

During 2017, the Company granted a total of 87,076 shares of Restricted Stock to officers, and employees. These shares of Restricted Stock vest over time up to twenty equal quarterly installments.  In 2017, 22,694 shares of Restricted Stock were forfeited as a result of officers and employees terminating employment with the Company.

During 2016, the Company granted a total of 171,252 shares of Restricted Stock to officers, employees and directors. These shares of Restricted Stock vest over time up to twenty equal quarterly installments.  In 2016, 7,167 shares of Restricted Stock were forfeited as a result of directors and employees terminating employment with the Company.

The share issuances in all of the above transactions were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  The issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities

11


Act and/or Regulation D thereunder, as they were transactions by the issuer that did not involve public offerings of securities and/or involved issuances to accredited investors.

As of February 12, 2018, there were approximately 112 record holders of our Common Stock. This figure does not include an estimate of the number of beneficial holders whose shares are held of record by brokerage firms and clearing agencies.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, we repurchased shares of our Common Stock as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Number

 

 

 

 

Shares That

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Shares

 

 

 

 

May Yet Be

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased as

 

 

 

 

Purchased

 

 

 

Total

 

Average

 

Part of Publicly

 

Average

 

Under the

 

 

 

Number

 

Price Paid

 

Announced

 

Price Paid

 

 Plans or

 

 

 

of Shares

 

Per Share

 

Plans or

 

Per Share

 

Programs

 

Period

 

Purchased

 

(2)

 

Programs

 

(3)

 

(4)(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 1, 2017-  October 31, 2017

 

500

 

$

13.70

 

500

 

$

13.70

 

547,488

 

November 1, 2017- November 30, 2017

 

7,577

(1)

$

14.05

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

547,488

 

December 1, 2017- December 31, 2017

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

547,488

 

Total

 

8,077

 

$

14.03

 

500

 

$

13.70

 

547,488

 


(1)

Includes 7,577 shares surrendered to the Company by employees to satisfy individual tax withholding obligations upon vesting of previously issued shares of Restricted Stock. These shares are not included in the Common Stock repurchase program referred to in footnote (4) below.

(2)

Average price paid per share reflects the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the business date the shares were surrendered by the employee stockholder to satisfy individual tax withholding obligations upon vesting of Restricted Stock or the price of the Common Stock paid on the open market purchase, as applicable.

(3)

Average price paid per share reflects the price of the Company’s Common Stock purchased on the open market.

(4)

On December 3, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an increase of 500,000 shares of Common Stock to the number of shares of Common Stock available for repurchase under its repurchase plans. The Company expects to purchase shares of its Common Stock from time to time in the market or otherwise subject to market conditions. The Common Stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date.

(5)

On July 27, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved, and on September 1, 2016, the Company entered a written purchase plan intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Plan”). The Plan involved purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock commencing September 1, 2016, and was in effect until February 28, 2017.  Pursuant to the Plan, the Company’s broker could affect purchases of up to an aggregate of 325,000 shares of Common Stock. 

(6)

On February 2, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company approved, and on March 1, 2017, the Company entered a written purchase plan intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Plan”). The Plan involved purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock commencing March 1, 2017, and was in effect until September 30, 2017. Pursuant to the Plan, the Company’s broker could  affect purchases of up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of Common Stock.

12


STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s Common Stock with the cumulative total return of the S&P Midcap 400 Index and the S&P 500 Computer and Electronics Retail Index for the period commencing December 31, 2012 and ending December 31, 2017, assuming $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 and the reinvestment of dividends.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base

 

INDEXED RETURNS

 

 

 

Period

 

Year ended

 

Company / Index

    

Dec-12

    

Dec-13

    

Dec-14

    

Dec-15

    

Dec-16

    

Dec-17

 

Wayside Technology Group, Inc.

 

100

 

128.45

 

170.47

 

188.66

 

200.02

 

185.85

 

S&P MidCap 400 Index

 

100

 

133.50

 

146.54

 

143.35

 

173.08

 

201.20

 

S&P 500 Computer & Electronics Retail Index

 

100

 

275.33

 

250.14

 

206.62

 

307.61

 

505.99

 

13


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, selected consolidated financial and other data for Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and its Subsidiaries. You should read the selected consolidated financial and other data below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes in Part II, Item 8, and with “Item 7. Management’sCompensation Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditionset forth above with management. Based on the review and Results of Operations”discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the full Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included elsewhere in thisthe Company’s 2019 Form 10-K.

The Committee

Year Ended December 31,John McCarthy, Chair

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

    

2013

 

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

Net sales- (1)

 

$

449,379

 

$

418,131

 

$

382,090

 

$

340,758

 

$

300,390

 

Cost of sales

 

 

422,303

 

 

390,800

 

 

355,517

 

 

315,948

 

 

276,035

 

Gross profit

 

 

27,076

 

 

27,331

 

 

26,573

 

 

24,810

 

 

24,355

 

Selling, general and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

administrative expenses

 

 

19,263

 

 

18,715

 

 

18,063

 

 

16,513

 

 

15,505

 

Income from operations

 

 

7,813

 

 

8,616

 

 

8,510

 

 

8,297

 

 

8,850

 

Other income, net

 

 

740

 

 

317

 

 

348

 

 

461

 

 

562

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 

 

8,553

 

 

8,933

 

 

8,858

 

 

8,758

 

 

9,412

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

3,491

 

 

3,032

 

 

3,028

 

 

2,998

 

 

3,019

 

Net income

 

$

5,062

 

$

5,901

 

$

5,830

 

$

5,760

 

$

6,393

 

Net income per common share - (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

$

1.20

 

$

1.37

 

Diluted

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

$

1.20

 

$

1.37

 

Weighted average common

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

4,299

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 

 

4,661

 

 

4,454

 

Diluted

 

 

4,299

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 

 

4,661

 

 

4,454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andy Bryant

(1)

See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10K, for information related to the anticipated impact on revenue from the adoption of ASC 606 – Revenue From Contracts With Customers, effective January 1, 2018.

(2)

Reflects restated net income per common share as discussed further in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10K. 

.

.  

December 31,

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

    

2013

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

 

                

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

5,530

 

$

13,524

 

$

23,823

 

$

23,124

 

$

19,609

 

Working capital

 

 

29,078

 

 

24,477

 

 

30,568

 

 

31,161

 

 

24,016

 

Total assets

 

 

102,725

 

 

113,698

 

 

94,082

 

 

94,981

 

 

94,760

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

38,712

 

 

37,611

 

 

38,659

 

 

39,567

 

 

34,721

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mike Faith

14


Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.  This discussion and analysis contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Our Company is an IT channel company, primarily selling software and other third-party IT products and services through two reportable operating segments. Through our “Lifeboat Distribution” segment we sell products and services to corporate resellers, value added resellers (VARs), consultants and systems integrators worldwide, who in turn sell these products to end users. Through our “TechXtend Segment” we act as a value-added reseller, selling computer software and hardware developed by others and provide technical services directly to end user customers in the USA and Canada.  We offer an extensive line of products from leading publishers of software and tools for virtualization/cloud computing, security, networking, storage and infrastructure management, application lifecycle management and other technically sophisticated domains as well as computer hardware. We market these products through creative marketing communications, including our web sites, local and on-line seminars, webinars, social media, direct e-mail, and printed materials.

The Company has subsidiaries in the United States, Canada and the Netherlands,  through which its sales are made.

Factors Influencing Our Financial Results

We derive the majority of our net sales though the sale of third-party software licenses, maintenance and service agreements. In our Lifeboat distribution segment, sales are impacted by the number of product lines we distribute, and sales penetration of those products into the reseller channel, product lifecycle competitive, and demand characteristics of the products which we are authorized to distribute. In our TechXtend segment sales are generally driven by sales force effectiveness and success in providing superior customer service, competitive pricing, and flexible payment solutions to our customers. Our sales are also impacted by external factors such as levels of IT spending and customer demand for products we distribute.

We sell in a competitive environment where gross product margins have historically declined due to competition and changes in product mix towards products where no delivery of a physical product is required. To date, we have been able to implement cost efficiencies such as the use of drop shipments, electronic ordering (“EDI”) and other capabilities to be able to operate our business profitably as gross margins have declined.

Selling general and administrative expenses are comprised mainly of employee salaries, commissions and other employee related expenses, facility costs, costs to maintain our IT infrastructure, public company compliance costs and professional fees. We monitor our level of accounts payable, inventory turnover and accounts receivable turnover which are measures of how efficiently we utilize capital in our business.

The Company’s sales, gross profit and results of operations have fluctuated and are expected to continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis as a result of a number of factors, including but not limited to: the condition of the software industry in general, shifts in demand for software products, pricing, level of extended payment terms sales transactions, industry shipments of new software products or upgrades, fluctuations in merchandise returns, adverse weather conditions that affect response, distribution or shipping, shifts in the timing of holidays and changes in the Company’s product offerings. The Company’s operating expenditures are based on sales forecasts. If sales do not meet expectations in any given quarter, operating results may be materially adversely affected.

15


Dividend Policy and Share Repurchase Program. Historically we have sought to return value to investors through the payment of quarterly dividends and share repurchases. Total dividends paid and shares repurchased were $3.1 and $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively, and $3.2 million and $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,  respectively. The payment of future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and dependent on results of operations, projected capital requirements and other factors the Board of Directors may find relevant.

Stock Volatility. The technology sector of the United States stock markets is subject to substantial volatility. Numerous conditions which impact the technology sector or the stock market in general or the Company in particular, whether or not such events relate to or reflect upon the Company’s operating performance, could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s Common Stock. Furthermore, fluctuations in the Company’s operating results, announcements regarding litigation, the loss of a significant vendor or customer, increased competition, reduced vendor incentives and trade credit, higher operating expenses, and other developments, could have a significant impact on the market price of our Common Stock.

Financial Overview

Net sales increased 7%, or $31.2 million, to $449.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $418.1 million for the same period in 2016. Gross profit decreased 1%, or $0.3 million, to $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $27.3 million in the prior year.  Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased 3%, or $0.5 million, to $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $18.7 million in the prior year. Net income decreased 14%, or $0.8 million, to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $5.9 million in the prior year. Weighted Average diluted shares outstanding decreased by 4.5% from the prior year, primarily due to the Company’s share buyback program. Income per share diluted decreased 10.3% to $1.13 for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $1.25 for the same period in 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Revenues from the sales of hardware products, software products, licenses, maintenance and subscription agreements are recognized on a gross basis upon delivery or fulfillment, with the selling price to the customer recorded as sales and the acquisition cost of the product recorded as cost of sales.

On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to product returns, bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, stock-based compensation, contingencies and litigation.

The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements affect its more significant judgments and estimates.

Allowance for Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Management determines the estimate of the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable by considering a number of factors, including:  historical experience, aging of the accounts receivable, and specific information obtained by the Company on the financial condition and the current creditworthiness of its

16


customers. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. At the time of sale, we record an estimate for sales returns based on historical experience. If actual sales returns are greater than estimated by management, additional expense may be incurred.

Accounts Receivable – Long Term

The Company’s accounts receivable long-term are discounted to their present value at prevailing market rates at the time of sale. In doing so, the Company considers competitive market rates and other relevant factors.

Inventory Allowances

The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-offs may be required.

Income Taxes

The Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. In the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Share-Based Payments

Under the fair value recognition provision, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. We make certain assumptions in order to value and expense our various share-based payment awards. In connection with our restricted stock programs we record the forfeitures when they occur. We review our valuation assumptions periodically and, as a result, we may change our valuation assumptions used to value stock based awards granted in future periods. Such changes may lead to a significant change in the expense we recognize in connection with share-based payments.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. In March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued additional updates to the new accounting standard which provide supplemental adoption guidance and clarifications. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue in order to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard will also result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers.

The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, and early adoption as of January 1, 2017 is permitted.

The Company elected to adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method, which will require the Company to recast our historical financial information for the years 2017 and 2016 to be consistent with the standard. The most significant impact of adopting the standard relates to the determination of whether the Company is acting as a principal or an agent in the sale of third party security software and software that is highly interdependent

17


with support, as well as maintenance, support and other services. Historically, under the transfer of risk and rewards model of revenue recognition, the Company has accounted for primarily all of its sales on a gross basis. The new guidance requires the Company to identify performance obligations and assess transfer of control. While assessing its performance obligations for sales of security software and software subscriptions that are highly interdependent with support, the Company determined that the vendor has ongoing performance obligations with the end customer that are not separately identifiable from the software itself. The Company also determined that the vendor has ongoing performance obligation for sales of certain third-party maintenance, support and service contracts. In these instances, under the new guidance, the Company has determined that it does not have control and is acting as an agent in the sale. When acting as an agent in a transaction, the Company accounts for sales on a net basis, with the vendor cost associated with the sale recognized as a reduction of revenue. The change from gross sale to net reporting has no impact on gross profit, net income or cash flows.

The adoption of the standard is expected to result in a reduction of reported revenue of $288.8 million,  $253.5 million and $218.4 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, had the standard been adopted at the earliest period presented. The adoption is not expected to have any impact on income from operations or the Company’s balance sheet. For additional information on the expected impact to reported results please see note 2 of the consolidated financial statements in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330)", ("ASU 2015-11"). Topic 330, Inventory, currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market, with market value represented by replacement cost, net realizable value or net realizable value less a normal profit margin. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 require an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We adopted ASU 2015-11 during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09 related to the recognition of excess tax benefits in the income statement and classification in the statement of cash flows on a prospective basis and the prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures of share-based awards when they occur in determining compensation cost to be recognized each period. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease guidance under FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 840, Leases, resulting in the creation of FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize for all leases with terms longer than 12 months in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term for both finance and operating leases. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) ("ASU No. 2016-13"). ASU No. 2016-13 replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments requiring consideration for a broader range of information in determining timing of when such losses are recorded. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The company is currently evaluating the potential effects of adopting the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 on it consolidated financial statements.

18


In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-15”) ASU 2016-15 which reduces diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” This amendment is intended to improve accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. In accordance with this guidance, an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted in fiscal 2018 with modified retrospective application. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Scope of Modification Accounting”, to reduce diversity in practice and provide clarity regarding existing guidance in ASC 718, “Stock Compensation”. The amendments in this updated guidance clarify that an entity should apply modification accounting in response to a change in the terms and conditions of an entity’s share-based payment awards unless three newly specified criteria are met. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the potential impacts of this updated guidance, and it does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) –Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. The amendments in this update also make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current GAAP. ASU No. 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years; the ASU allows for early adoption in any interim period after issuance of the update. The company is currently assessing the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, a summary of the years indicatedannual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities of the percentage of net sales represented by selected items reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The year-to-year comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of future results:

named executive officers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Net sales

 

100

%  

100

%  

100

%

Cost of sales

 

94.0

 

93.5

 

93.1

 

Gross profit

 

6.0

 

6.5

 

6.9

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

4.3

 

4.5

 

4.7

 

Income from operations

 

1.7

 

2.0

 

2.2

 

Other income

 

0.2

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

Income before income taxes

 

1.9

 

2.1

 

2.3

 

Income tax provision

 

0.8

 

0.7

 

0.8

 

Net income

 

1.1

%  

1.4

%  

1.5

%

Name and Principal
Position

    

Year

    

Salary ($)

    

Bonus ($)

    

Stock
Awards

($) (1)

    

Non-Equity
Incentive
Compensation
($) (2)

    

All Other
Compensation
($) (7)

    

Total($)

 

Simon Nynens

Former Chair, President and

2018 

131,538 

— 

— 

— 

844,847 

976,385 

Chief Executive Officer

2017 

300,000 

— 

473,100 

400,989 

100,961 

1,275,050 

Steve DeWindt (3)

Former Director, President and

2019 

151,218 

— 

— 

— 

105,645 

256,863 

Chief Executive Officer

2018 

222,788��

— 

51,200 

— 

4,375 

278,363 

Dale Foster (4)

Director and Chief Executive

2019 

254,327 

— 

104,129 

123,370 

16,511 

498,337 

Officer and Former President of Lifeboat and Former Executive Vice President

2018 

248,077 

— 

288,000 

— 

11,945 

548,022 

Michael Vesey (5)

2019 

303,876 

— 

125,735 

95,340 

16,249 

541,200 

Vice President and Chief

2018 

225,000 

— 

64,000 

71,300 

15,835 

376,135 

Financial Officer

2017 

175,000 

— 

302,500 

51,330 

12,178 

541,008 

Vito Legrottaglie

2019 

247,917 

— 

126,505 

137,892 

13,951 

526,265 

Vice President Chief

2018 

225,000 

— 

64,000 

71,300 

15,473 

375,773 

Information Officer

2017 

200,000 

— 

124,500 

102,660 

15,232 

442,392 

Brian Gilbertson (5)

2019 

145,833 

— 

— 

— 

129,229 

275,062 

Former Vice President and

2018 

200,000 

— 

52,224 

110,000 

9,229 

371,453 

General Manager Lifeboat

2017 

175,000 

— 

132,800 

139,983 

4,296 

452,079 

Charles Bass (6)

2019 

254,327 

— 

82,090 

97,258 

10,351 

444,026 

Vice President New Business Development

2018 

248,097 

— 

144,000 

— 

10,192 

402,289 


(1)The amount included in “Stock Awards” is the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8, “Stockholder’s Equity and Stock Based Compensation” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the assumptions made in determining stock award values.
(2)Amounts for a given year in this column represent non-stock incentive compensation earned in that year, which were paid out in the subsequent year. For more information regarding the Performance Bonus Plan see Base Salary and Performance Cash Bonus Plan above.
(3)Mr. DeWindt served as President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2018 until his resignation in June 2019. Compensation presented for 2019 represents the period from January 2019 until his resignation in June 2019. Mr. DeWindt received certain separation payments discussed in “All Other Compensation” below.
(4)Mr. Foster was appointed Chief Executive Officer in January 2020, after having served as President of Lifeboat from July 2019 until January 2020 and served as Executive Vice President from January 2018 until July 2019. In connection with his appointment to Chief Executive Officer in January 2020, Mr. Foster will receive a base salary of $325,000 per annum. Compensation presented for 2018 represents the period from appointment to December 31, 2018.

1917


(5)Mr. Gilbertson served as Vice President and General Manager of Lifeboat from May 2016 until his resignation in July 2019. Mr. Gilbertson received certain separation payments discussed in all other compensation below.
(6)Mr. Bass was appointed Vice President New Business Development in January 2018.
(7)A detailed description of the items disclosed as “All Other Compensation” is set forth in the table below.

All Other Compensation

Name

    

    

    

401(k)
Matching
Contributions ($)

    

Dividend
Equivalents 

On Unvested 
Restricted
Stock

($)

    

Post-
Employment
Benefits ($)

    

Total ($)

 

Steve DeWindt

2019 

4,412 

1,233 

  

(1) 100,000

105,645 

2018 

4,375 

— 

— 

4,375 

Dale Foster

2019 

7,585 

8,926 

— 

16,511 

2018 

3,019 

8,926 

— 

11,945 

Michael Vesey

2019 

7,131 

9,118 

— 

16,249 

2018 

6,949 

8,886 

— 

15,835 

2017 

6,228 

5,950 

— 

12,178 

Vito Legrottaglie

2019 

6,369 

7,582 

— 

13,951 

2018 

7,035 

8,438 

— 

15,473 

2017 

7,727 

7,505 

— 

15,232 

Brian Gilbertson

2019 

— 

4,629 

  

(2) 124,600

129,229 

2018 

— 

9,229 

— 

9,229 

2017 

— 

4,296 

— 

4,296 

Charles Bass

2019 

5,888 

4,463 

— 

10,351 

2018 

5,708 

4,484 

— 

10,192 


(1)This amount reflects cash severance paid to Mr. DeWindt in connection with his resignation, which is described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—DeWindt and Gilbertson Resignation” above.
(2)This amount reflects cash severance paid to Mr. Gilbertson in connection with his resignation, which is described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—DeWindt and Gilbertson Resignation” above.

18


Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Net Sales

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased 7%, or $31.2 million, to $449.4 million, compared to $418.1 million for the same period in 2016. Net sales in our Lifeboat distribution segment increased $47.9 million, or 13% to $417.4 million when compared to the prior year, however the increase was offset by decreased extended payment term sales in our TechXtend segment (discussed below).  

Grant of Plan-Based Awards

The increase in our Lifeboat Distribution segment was primarily duefollowing table shows information regarding awards granted to growth in sales penetration for severaleach of our more significant product lines, as well as the addition of several new product lines. The increases were partially offset by turnover in some vendor and customer accounts due to competitive bid situations. We operate in a competitive market in which some sales agreements are subject to periodic competitive bidding processes, resulting in fluctuations from year to year based on the outcome.

  TechXtend segment net sales decreased $16.7 million or 34% to $32.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $48.6 million for the prior year.  The decrease in TechXtend was due primarily to lower large enterprise sales, including those soldnamed executive officers under extended payment terms. Large enterprise sales tend to fluctuate from period to period based on the timing of customer purchasing decisions for IT projects. The Company’s focus on extended payment sales is impacted by such timing, and internal capital allocation decisions.  During 2017, as significant amount of our working capital was invested in vendor prepayments and extended payment sales from the fourth quarter of 2016, reducing our  emphasis on this business2019 Performance Bonus Plan during 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we relied on two key customers for a total of 42.4% of our revenue. One major customer accounted for 23.0% and the other for 19.4%, of our total net sales during the year ended December 31, 2017.  These  same customers accounted for 15.1% and 28.6%, of total net accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased 1% or $0.3 million, to $27.1 million, compared to $27.3 million for the prior year. Lifeboat Distribution segment gross profit increased 4% to $23.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $22.3 million for the prior year. TechXtend segment gross profit decreased 22% to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $5.0 million for the prior year. Gross profit decreased primarily due to lower extended payment terms sales in our TechXtend segment described above and vendor competitive pressures on gross profit margins as discussed below, which were mitigated in part by the impact of increased sales in our Lifeboat segment.

Gross profit margin (gross profit as a percentage of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was 6.0% compared to 6.5% in 2016. Lifeboat Distribution segment gross profit margin was 5.6% for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 6.0%  in 2016. The decrease in gross profit margin for the Lifeboat Distribution segment was caused primarily by competitive pricing pressure and a change in product mix to a higher percentage of our sales being derived from the sale of third party software subscription and maintenance contracts. Gross profit as a percentage of sales generally is lower on subscription and maintenance contracts than on product sales. We operate in a competitive environment where the trend has been for gross profit margins as a percentage of net sales to decline for the past several years and may continue to decline in the future.  We have instituted operational efficiencies such as electronic ordering and distribution through the use of EDI and other automation that have increased our productivity and enabled us to maintain profitability while selling these services. TechXtend segment gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2017 was 12.2%, compared to 10.2%  in 2016. The increase in gross profit margin was due to a decrease in larger enterprise and public sector sales. Sales of large enterprise licenses and related equipment typically carry a lower gross profit margin as a percent of gross billings, and lower incremental selling and administrative costs as a percentage of revenue, than smaller account sales.

2019.

20

Estimated future payouts under 
non- equity incentive plan awards (1)

Estimated future payouts under
equity incentive plan awards (2)

All other 
Stock 
Awards
Number

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Threshold

Target

Maximum

of Shares

Awards

Name

Grant Date

($)

($)

($)

(#)

(#)

(#)

(#)

($)

Dale Foster

    

2/13/2019

    

— 

    

105,500 

    

211,000 

    

— 

    

10,000 

    

20,000 

    

— 

    

104,129 

(3)

Michael Vesey

2/13/2019

— 

105,500 

395,625 

— 

10,000 

37,500 

— 

125,735 

(3)

Vito Legrottaglie

2/13/2019

— 

105,500 

229,348 

— 

10,000 

21,739 

— 

126,505 

(3)

Charles Bass

2/13/2019

— 

105,500 

211,000 

— 

10,000 

20,000 

— 

82,090 

(3)


(1)These amounts represent threshold, target and maximum awards established under our 2019 performance bonus plan. The actual amount of each award authorized for payment by our Compensation Committee in February 2020 is included in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table above under the heading “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation.”
(2)These amounts represent threshold, target and maximum awards of Restricted Stock awards granted under our 2019 performance bonus plan.
(3)These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of each award of Restricted Stock granted during 2019. See Note 8, “Stockholder’s Equity and Stock Based Compensation” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the assumptions made in determining stock award values.

Vendor rebates and discounts for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $2.2 million compared to $2.0 million in the same period last year. Vendor rebates are dependent on reaching certain targets set by our vendors. The Company monitors vendor rebate levels, competitive pricing, and gross profit margins carefully. We anticipate that price competition in our market will continue in both of our business segments.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $0.5 million, or 3%,  to $19.3 million, compared to $18.7 million for the prior year. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to higher employee related and other expenses to support our growth and compliance as a public company. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 4.3% in 2017 compared to 4.5% in 2016.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The Company expects that its SG&A expenses, as a percentage of net sales, may vary depending on changes in sales volume, as well as the levels of continuing investments in key growth initiatives. We plan to continue to expand our investment in information technology and marketing, while monitoring SG&A expenses closely.

Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.5 million or 40.8% of income before taxes, compared to $3.0 million or 33.9% of income before taxes for 2016. The 2017 tax expense includes charges of $0.2 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred tax assets and transition tax for foreign unrepatriated earnings under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and approximately $0.4 million related to a provision for state taxes for states with economic nexus statutes and other adjustments. 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and introduces significant changes to the U.S. income tax law.  Effective in 2018, the Tax Act reduces U.S. statutory tax rates from 34% to 21%. Accordingly, we remeasured our deferred taxes as of December 31, 2017 to reflect the reduced rate that will apply in future periods when these deferred taxes are settled or realized.  

Due to the timing of the enactment and the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we have made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our financial statements as of December 31, 2017.  As we collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret the Tax Act and any additional guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and other standard-setting bodies, we may make adjustments to the provisional amounts.  Those adjustments may materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate in the period in which adjustments are made.  The accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act will be completed in 2018.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Net Sales

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased 9%, or $36.0 million, to $418.1 million, compared to $382.1 million for the same period in 2015. Net sales increased in both our Lifeboat Distribution segment and our TechXtend segment.

Lifeboat Distribution segment net sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $29.8 million, or 9%, to $369.5 million, compared to $339.7 million for the same period a year earlier. The increase was primarily due to increased penetration of existing products into new and existing distribution partner accounts, as well as the addition of several new product lines. The increases were partially offset by turnover in some vendor and distribution accounts due to competitive bid situations. We operate in a competitive market in which some sales agreements are subject to periodic competitive bidding processes, resulting in fluctuations from year to year based on the outcome.

TechXtend segment net sales increased $6.2 million, or 15% to $48.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $42.4 million for the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher sales to major accounts on extended payment terms, partially offset by the impact of a reduced number of sales people and lower revenues from

21


marketing services. We extend payment terms on some enterprise account sales, typically for periods of one to three years, to provide flexibility for our customers. We reduced our number of sales people late in 2015 to streamline and focus our operations on opportunities with the highest financial return.

Gross Profit

Gross Profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased 3%, or $0.8 million, to $27.3 million, compared to $26.6 million for the same period in 2015. Lifeboat Distribution segment gross profit increased 4% to $22.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,  compared to $21.5 million for the same period in the prior year. TechXtend segment gross profit remained flat at $5.0 million for each of 2016 and 2015. Gross profit amounts reflect increased sales volumes and competitive pressures on gross profit margins discussed below.

Gross profit margin (gross profit as a percentage of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 6.5% compared to 7.0% in 2015. Lifeboat Distribution segment gross profit margin was 6.0% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 6.3% in 2015. The decrease in gross profit margin for the Lifeboat Distribution segment was caused primarily by competitive pricing pressure and product mix. We operate in a competitive environment where the trend has been for gross profit margins to decline for the past several years. We attribute some of the decline to an increasing portion of our revenues coming from the sale of licenses, maintenance and service agreements that are not associated with a physical product. While our gross profit margin has declined on these products, we have been able to maintain our profitability through efficiencies gained in electronic ordering and distribution through the use of EDI and other automation. TechXtend segment gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 10.2% compared to 11.9% in 2015. The decrease in gross profit margin was due to competitive market pricing, particularly on larger enterprise sales. Sales of large enterprise licenses typically carry a lower gross profit margin, and lower incremental selling and administrative costs as a percentage of revenue, than smaller account sales.

Vendor rebates and discounts for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2.0 million. Vendor rebates are dependent on reaching certain targets set by our vendors. The Company monitors vendor rebate levels, competitive pricing, and gross profit margins carefully. We anticipate that price competition in our market will continue in both of our business segments.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $0.7 million or 4% to $18.7 million, compared to $18.1 million for the same period in 2015.  The increase is primarily due to increased stock based compensation and employee related expenses to support our increased sales volume, costs related to the relocation to our new offices in October 2016, and professional expenses related to public company compliance. SG&A  expenses were 4.5% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2016, and 4.7% for the same period in 2015.

The Company expects that its SG&A expenses, as a percentage of net sales, may vary depending on changes in sales volume, as well as the levels of continuing investments in key growth initiatives. We plan to continue to expand our investment in information technology and marketing, while monitoring our sales and general and administrative expenses closely.

Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.0 million which consists of a provision of $2.5 million for U.S. federal income taxes, as well as a $0.1 million provision for state taxes, and a provision for foreign taxes of $0.4 million.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a U.S. deferred tax asset of approximately $0.4 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.0 million which consists of a provision of $2.7 million for U.S. federal income taxes, as well as a $0.1 million provision for state taxes, and a provision for foreign taxes of $0.2 million.

22


As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a U.S. deferred tax asset of approximately $0.5 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $8.0 million to $5.5 million at December 31, 2017 from $13.5 million at December 31, 2016. The use of cash was primarily due to working capital investments to support the growth of our business, and utilization of cash for stock repurchases and dividends. The increase in working capital related to increased payment terms for certain accounts and vendor prepayments for inventory purchases.

Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $2.0 million, comprised of net income adjusted for non-cash items of $7.2 million, offset by cash used in changes in operating assets and liabilities of $9.3 million.

 The increase in cash used in changes in operating assets and liabilities in 2017 was primarily due to an increase in net working capital (accounts receivable, inventory, and vendor prepayments less accounts payable) required to support our business. The increased working capital requirement is primarily driven by increased sales levels and extended payment terms sales during the fourth quarter of 2016, and a vendor prepayment of approximately $8.0 million as part of a distribution agreement.  Our accounts receivable – long term increased by approximately $4.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2016 due to a higher level of extended payment term sales. The products related to these sales were paid for in the first quarter of 2017, while related sales proceeds will be collected over future periods.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $0.5 million, comprised of net income adjusted for non-cash items of $7.9 million, offset by cash used by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $8.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $8.2 million comprised of net income adjusted for non-cash items of $7.3 million and cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $0.9 million.

The increase in cash used in changes in operating assets and liabilities in 2016 was primarily due to increased accounts receivable, inventories and accounts receivable – long term, partially offset by increased accounts payable. The increase in accounts receivable and accounts payable was primarily due to higher fourth quarter 2016 sales activity when compared to the prior year, increased accounts receivable payment terms for a large reseller customer, and increased sales with extended payment terms. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 included approximately $9.5 million of accounts receivable related to two extended payment term sales from 2016 that were collected during the first two months of 2017.

In 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $0.4 million, compared to $1.0 million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to capital expenditures for equipment and leasehold improvements related to our new office in 2016. In October 2016, the Company moved into a new office, occupying approximately 20,000 square foot facility under a ten year lease with renewal options.

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $6.0 million was comprised of $3.1 million of dividend payments on our Common Stock, and $3.0 million for the purchases of treasury shares of our Common Stock.

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $8.5 million was comprised of $3.2 million of dividend payments on our Common Stock, and $5.4 million for the purchases of treasury shares of our Common Stock, offset by the tax benefit from share based compensation of $0.1 million.

On December 3, 2014, the Board of Directors approved an increase of 500,000 shares of Common Stock tofollowing table shows the number of shares of Common Stock available for repurchase under its repurchase plans. On February 2, 2017,covered by unvested Restricted Stock held by the Board of Directors approved an additional increase of 500,000Company’s named executive officers on December 31, 2019.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2019

Stock Awards

Number of

Market Value

Shares or

of Shares or

Units of Stock

Units of Stock

That Have

That Have

Not Vested

Not Vested

Name

(#)(1)

($)(2)

Steve DeWindt

    

— 

    

— 

 

Dale Foster

11,250 

180,338 

Michael Vesey

11,488 

184,153 

Vito Legrottaglie

8,912 

142,859 

Brian Gilbertson

— 

— 

Charles Bass

5,625 

90,169 


(1)In February 2019, Messrs. DeWindt, Vesey, Legrottaglie and Gilbertson were awarded 4,000, 5,000, 5,000 and 4,080 shares of Restricted Stock, respectively, based on achieving operating income goals under the 2018 bonus plan that vest over 16 equal quarterly installments. In May 2018, Messrs. Foster and Bass were awarded an initial employment grant of 20,000 and 10,000 shares of Restricted Stock, respectively, that vest over 16 equal quarterly installments. In February 2018, Messrs. Vesey, Legrottaglie, and Gilbertson were awarded 7,500, 7,500 and 8,000 shares of Restricted Stock, respectively, based on achieving operating income goals under the 2017 bonus plan that vest over 16 equal quarterly installments. In February 2017, Messrs. Legrottaglie and Gilbertson were awarded 5,700, and 7,500 shares of Restricted Stock, respectively, based on achieving operating income goals under the 2016 bonus plan that vest over 16 equal quarterly installments. In February 2017, Mr. Vesey was awarded an initial employment grant of 10,000 shares of Restricted Stock that vest over 20 equal quarterly installments. In February 2016, Mr. Legrottaglie was awarded 5,700 shares of Restricted Stock, respectively, based on achieving operating income goals under the 2015 bonus plan that vest over 16 equal quarterly installments. In February 2016, Mr. Gilbertson was awarded 5,000 shares of Restricted Stock that vest over 20 equal quarterly installments

19


(2)The market value is based on the closing stock price of the Common Stock of $16.03 on December 31, 2019, the last trading day of 2019.

Options Exercised and Stock toVested in 2019

The table below shows the number of shares of Common Stock available for repurchase under its repurchase plans.  A  totalacquired during 2019 upon the vesting of 2,963,525 sharesRestricted Stock.

Stock Awards

Number of

Shares

Value

Acquired On

Realized On

Name

    

Vesting (#)

    

Vesting ($)

Steve DeWindt

500 

5,663 

 

Dale Foster

5,000 

60,650 

Michael Vesey

5,128 

62,190 

Vito Legrottaglie

5,976 

72,477 

Brian Gilbertson

4,419 

50,303 

Charles Bass

2,500 

30,325 

Employment and Severance Agreements

Each of the named executive officers has entered into an agreement that includes a covenant not-to-compete and a confidentiality provision. The covenant not-to-compete prohibits the executive from engaging in a competing business for a period of one year after termination. Such covenant also prohibits the executive from directly or indirectly soliciting the Company’s Common Stock has been bought backcustomers or employees.

On January 15, 2020, the Company appointed Dale Foster to be its Chief Executive Officer and entered into a related employment agreement with Mr. Foster. The agreement provides for an initial base salary of $325,000 per annum, subject to increase at the discretion of the Board, or a committee thereof. Additionally, he will be eligible to participate in any and all standard benefit plans, programs and policies of the Company.

In the event of any termination of the Employment Agreement for any reason, the Company shall pay Mr. Foster within 30 days of such termination: (i) accrued and unpaid base salary; (ii) any unreimbursed expenses payable; (iii) any amounts payable under any of the benefit plans of the Company in which Mr. Foster was a participant in; and (iv) any accrued but unpaid bonus for any calendar year completed as of December 31, 2017, leaving 547,488 shares of Common Stock available thatthe termination date (collectively, the “Standard Termination Benefits”).

If Mr. Foster’s employment terminates by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Foster for Good Reason, and if Mr. Foster complies with the other provisions in the Employment Agreement, Mr. Foster will receive, in addition to the Standard Termination Benefits, (i) an amount equal to his then current base salary for twelve months (the “Severance Period”) paid in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices, (ii) if elected, reimbursement for continuation premiums under COBRA during the Severance Period, (iii) if the effective date for such termination of employment is on or after July 1st during any calendar year, a cash payment equal to (A) the cash bonus paid to Mr. Foster for the calendar year prior to the date of termination, multiplied by (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during such calendar year that Mr. Foster was employed by the Company, and the denominator of which is 365 ((i), (ii) and (iii), collectively, the “Severance Benefits”). The Severance Benefits will be paid in a lump sum on the 60th day following Mr. Foster’s Separation from Service (as defined in the Employment Agreement), subject to execution of a release of claims.

If Mr. Foster’s employment terminates by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Foster for Good Reason within twelve months following a change in control, in addition to the severance benefits described in the previous two paragraphs, Mr. Foster also receives a cash bonus equal to 100% of his bonus for the prior year, and full vesting of all outstanding equity awards, subject to execution of a release of claims.

2320


authorized to buy back in the future as of such date. The Company expects to purchase shares of its Common Stock from time to time in the market or otherwise subject to market conditions. The Common Stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. 

We intend to hold the repurchased shares in treasury for general corporate purposes, including issuances under various stock plans. As of December 31, 2017, we held 829,671 shares of our Common Stock in treasury at an average cost of $17.12 per share. As of December 31,In October 2016, we held 729,066 shares of our Common Stock in treasury at an average cost of $16.50 per share.

On November 15, 2017, the Company entered into a $20,000,000 revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”)severance agreement with Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) pursuant to a Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Loan Note (the “Note”), Second Amended and Restated Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) and Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement (the “Pledge Agreement”).  The Credit Facility, which will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, matures on August 31, 2020, at which time the Company must pay all outstanding principal of all outstanding loans plus all accrued and unpaid interest, and any interest, fees, costs and expenses, if any.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.  The Company incurred $0.1 million of interest expense, related to the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no interest expense for the years ended, 2016 and 2015.

Our current and anticipated use of cash and cash equivalents is to fund working capital, operational expenditures, the stock repurchase program and dividends, if any, declared by the Board of Directors.

Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2017

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment due by Period

    

Total

    

Less than 1 year

    

1-3 years

    

 

4-5 years

    

 

After 5 years

 

Operating Leases obligations (1)

 

$

4,260

 

$

508

 

$

1,303

 

$

877

 

$

1,572

 

Total Contractual Obligations

 

$

4,260

 

$

508

 

$

1,303

 

$

877

 

$

1,572

 


(1)

Operating leases relate primarily to the leases of the space used for our operations in Eatontown, New Jersey, Mesa, Arizona, Mississauga, Canada and Amsterdam, Netherlands. The commitments for operating leases include the minimum rent payments.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company is not committed by lines of credit or standby letters of credit, and has no standby repurchase obligations or other commercial commitments (see Note 5 - Credit Facility in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements).

Foreign Exchange

The Company’s foreign business is subject to changes in demand or pricing resulting from fluctuations in currency exchange rates or other factors. We are subject to fluctuations primarily in the Canadian and Euro Dollar-to-U.S. Dollar exchange rate.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303 (a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

24


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

In addition to its activities in the USA, 7%  and 6% of the Company’s 2017 sales were generated in Canada and Europe and the rest of the world, respectively. We are subject to general risks attendant to the conduct of business in Canada and other countries, including economic uncertainties and foreign government regulations. In addition, the Company’s foreign businesses are subject to changes in demand or pricing resulting from fluctuations in currency exchange rates or other factors.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company maintains its cash accounts primarily in financial institutions with global operations.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at Item 15(a).

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures”, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of various members of our management, including our Company’s President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer),Mr. Vesey, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, (principal financial officer)under which Mr. Vesey is entitled to severance payments for six months at the then applicable annual base salary if the Company terminates his employment for any reason other than for cause. Additionally, in the event that a change of control of the Company occurs (as described below), the Chief Financial Officer’s outstanding equity awards become immediately vested and he is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to 1.0 times his then current annual salary and actual incentive bonus earned in the year prior to such change in control.

On January 6, 2003, the Company entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Legrottaglie, Vice President and Chief AccountingInformation Officer, (principal accounting officer). Based uponunder which Mr. Legrottaglie is entitled to severance payments for six months at the then applicable annual base salary if the Company terminates his employment.

On January 2, 2018, the Company entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Bass, Vice President - New Business Development, under which Mr. Bass is entitled to severance payments for six months at the then applicable annual base salary and any outstanding equity awards become immediately vested if the Company terminates his employment for any reason other than for cause.

The payments triggered by such terminations pursuant to Mr. Foster, Mr. Vesey, Mr. Legrottaglie and Mr. Bass’ respective employment agreements, as well as those triggered by a change of control under the employment agreements of all named executive officers, are illustrated in tabular format under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table illustrates the payments that evaluation, wewould be due the named executive officers in the event they are terminated without cause. Severance payments are calculated in accordance with employment agreements in place on December 31, 2019, as if each employee was terminated without cause on December 31, 2019.

    

    

    

    

    

Accelerated

    

Accelerated

    

    

 

Payment

Vesting on

Vesting on

Based On

Restricted

Stock

Name

Salary ($)(2)

Bonus ($)

Stock ($)

Options ($)

Total ($)

Dale Foster (1)

125,000 

— 

180,338 

— 

305,338 

Michael Vesey

150,000 

— 

— 

— 

150,000 

Vito Legrottaglie

125,000 

— 

— 

— 

125,000 

Charles Bass (1)

125,000 

— 

90,169 

— 

215,169 


(1)Messrs. Foster and Bass are entitled to receive reimbursement for COBRA continuation premiums over twelve and six-month periods, respectively, subsequent to their termination.
(2)The base salaries for each of Messrs. Foster, Vesey and Legrottaglie changed after December 31, 2019 before the filing of this Form 10-K/A. As of the date of this filing, the numbers in this column would be as follows: for Mr. Foster, $325,000; for Mr. Vesey, $137,500; and for Mr. Legrottaglie, $112,500.

The severance payments disclosed above are to be made to Mr. Foster over twelve months paid in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices and to Messrs. Vesey, Legrottaglie and Bass in six equal monthly installments.

For purposes of Mr. Foster, “cause” is defined as his (i) an act of personal dishonesty in connection with his responsibilities as an employee of the Company that is intended to result in personal enrichment of his; (ii) a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, conviction of, or an indictment for a felony or other crime involving theft, fraud or moral turpitude, in each case in which the Board reasonably believes has had or will have identified a material weaknessdetrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business; (iii) a breach of any fiduciary duty owed to the Company that has, or is reasonably expected to have, a material detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business (except in our controls over financial reporting that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosedthe case of a personal disability) as determined in good faith by the CompanyBoard; (iv) serious neglect or misconduct in the reports it files performance of his duties for the Company

21


or submits underwillful or repeated failure or refusal to perform such duties; (v) the Exchange Actmaterial breach by him of any provision of Section 6 [Restrictive Covenants] of his employment agreement if (in the event such failure is recorded, processed, summarized and reported withinreasonably susceptible of cure) such failure continues uncured for ten (10) days after written notice specifying in reasonable detail such failure; or (vi) the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, andabuse by him of drugs or alcohol, if such abuse has or is accumulated and communicatedreasonably expected to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Basedhave a material adverse effect on the material weakness described below, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective asbusiness of the endCompany. For purposes of the period covered by this report. A material weaknessMr. Vesey and Mr. Bass, “cause” is a deficiency or a combinationdefined as (i) act of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The weaknesses we identified relate to several deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of controls over: 1) the application of technical accounting guidance regarding earnings per share calculations which were reported and remediated in the third quarter of 2017, 2) classification of certain balance sheet accounts, 3) management review and monitoring of  third-party service providers in regard to state income tax filing requirements and 4) lack of documented policies and procedures  with respect to certain intercompany accounts with foreign entities, that in the aggregate constitute a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. Management performed additional procedures to determine the impact of these issues and determined that any errors resulting from the deficiencies above were immaterial individually and in the aggregate, to the Company’s current and previously issued financial statements, however, we concluded that it is appropriate to re-state previously reported amounts for earnings per share using the two-class calculation method when presented on a comparative basis with the current period. We’ve also concluded that had these errors gone undetected, they could have resulted in a material misstatement in our financial statements.

25


Remediation plan: We have implemented several processes, including those outlined below, to remediate the deficiencies noted above. We currently are assessing and improving the operating effectiveness of these controls to ensure they will operate at an acceptable level of assurance.

·

Hire and train appropriate personnel sufficient to manage the complexity, timing, and ever changing nature of our business and financial reporting requirements.

·

Retain and evaluate the qualifications and performance of experts who are engaged to assist in the evaluation and adoption of accounting and tax matters where appropriate.

·

Ensure controls are properly designed to address risks and train key process owners and other relevant personnel to perform timely reconciliations with appropriate documentation and review procedures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Other than what’s been disclosed above for our remediation of the material weakness, there have been no additional change in our internal control over financial reporting identifiedpersonal dishonesty in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) underexecutive’s responsibilities as an employee of the Exchange Act,Company that occurred duringis intended to result in the quarter endedexecutive’s substantial personal enrichment, (ii) a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, or conviction of, a felony which the Board reasonably believes has had or will have a material detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business, (iii) a breach of any fiduciary duty owed to the Company that has a material detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business, or (iv) willful violations of the executive’s obligations to the Company.

In addition to the severance payments described above, the Company has entered into certain agreements that require the Company to provide compensation to the named executive officers in the event of a change in control or a termination of employment in conjunction with a change in control. The additional amount of compensation due to each named executive officer upon a change in control or termination of employment in conjunction with a change in control is listed in the tables below. The table reflects amounts calculated in accordance with employment agreements in place on December 31, 2017,2019, as if a change in control occurred on December 31, 2019.

Change in Control

Termination in conjunction
with a Change in Control

Accelerated

Accelerated

Payment

Payment

Vesting on

Payment

Payment

Vesting on

Based on

Based on

Restricted

Based on

Based on

Restricted

Name

    

Salary ($)

    

Bonus ($)

    

Stock ($)

    

Total ($)

    

Salary ($)

    

Bonus ($)

    

Stock ($)

    

Total ($)

Dale Foster

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

 

Michael Vesey

300,000 

95,340 

124,136 

519,476 

— 

— 

60,016 

60,016 

Vito Legrottaglie

— 

82,843 

82,843 

— 

— 

60,016 

60,016 

Charles Bass

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

The accelerated vesting on restricted stock amounts above include unvested restricted stock grants through December 31, 2019, valued at the closing stock price of $16.03 at December 31, 2019. The amounts exclude stock grants made in 2020 to the named executives.

Mr. Foster entered into a new employment agreement upon his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in January 2020. Under the terms of that has materially affected, oragreement, in the event that Mr. Foster’s employment is reasonably likelyterminated within 12 months following a change in control (as defined in the Employment Agreement), Mr. Foster will receive, in addition to materially affect,his severance, an amount in cash equal to the cash bonus paid to Mr. Foster for the year immediately prior to the year in which the termination in the event of Change in Control occurs.

In the event that a change of control of the Company occurs (as described in the employment agreement), Mr. Vesey’s outstanding equity awards become immediately vested and he is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to 1.0 times his then annual salary and the actual incentive bonus earned in the year prior to such change in control in addition to the severance payments noted above if also terminated. Mr. Vesey’s salary was decreased from $300,000 to $275,000 effective January 31, 2020.

Pay Ratio

Recent SEC rules require us to disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of our internal control over financial reporting.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, EisnerAmper LLP, has auditedChief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of our internal control over financial reportingother employees. In determining the median annual total compensation of our other employees, we prepared a list of all employees as of December 31, 2017. Their attestation report2019. The date December 31, 2019 was used to determine the median employee for administrative convenience. Consistent with applicable rules, we used reasonable estimates both in the methodology used to identify the median employee and in calculating the annual total compensation of employees other than the Chief Executive Officer. We determined our median employee based on the audittaxable wages of each of our internal control over financial reporting is included below.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors,employees (excluding the Chief Executive OfficersOfficer). We annualized the taxable wages of employees who joined the Company during 2019.

22


The annual total compensation of our median employee (other than those serving as the Chief Executive Officer) for 2019 was $57,628. Two individuals served as Chief Executive Office during 2019. Mr. DeWindt served as Chief Executive Officer from January 1, 2019 through his resignation on June 6, 2019. Mr. Vesey served as Principal Executive Officer from June 6, 2019 through December 31, 2019. For purposes of calculating this pay ratio, we have added together the total compensation paid to each of Messrs. DeWindt and Corporate Governance

The information required hereunder, withVesey during the exceptiontime each individual served as Principal Executive Officer during 2019. As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, the total annual compensation for those serving as Principal Executive Officer for 2019 was $407,952. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the information relatingratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the executive officersmedian of the Registrantannual total compensation of all other employees was approximately 7 to 1. Given the different methodologies that is presented in Part I undervarious public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the heading “Executive Officers of the Company,” and the information relating to the Company’s Code of Ethical Conduct that is presented in Part I under the heading “Available Information,” is incorporated by reference herein from our Definitive Proxy Statementestimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than May 1, 2018  (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) under the sections captioned “Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance” and “Section 16 (a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required hereunder is incorporated by reference herein from the Definitive Proxy Statement under the sections captioned “Executives and Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance.”

comparison between companies.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Stock Plans

2012 Plan. The Company’s 2012 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”) has been established by the Company to: (i) attract and retain skilled employees and directors; (ii) motivate participants, by means of appropriate incentives, to achieve long-range goals; and (iii) link participants’ interests with those of the Company’s stockholders through compensation that is based on the Common Stock, and thereby promote the continued growth and financial success of the Company. At the annual stockholder’s meeting held on June 6, 2012, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan was amended on June 5, 2018 to increase the number of shares available for grant under the 2012 Plan from 600,000 to 1,000,000. The 2012 Plan authorizes the grant of Stock Options, Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock, Stock Bonuses, and other equity-based awards. As of December 31, 2019, the number of shares of Common Stock available for future award grants to employees, officers and directors under the 2012 Plan is 555,207. In February 2020, an additional 41,560 shares of Common Stock were issued to officers for performance under the 2019 incentive compensation plan.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information, required hereunder is incorporated by reference herein fromas of December 31, 2019, regarding securities authorized for issuance upon the Definitive Proxy Statementexercise of stock options and vesting of Restricted Stock under all of the sections captioned “Equity Compensation Plan Information — Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”Company’s equity compensation plans.

Plan Category

    

(a) Number of 
Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options and
Vesting of Stock Awards

    

(b) Weighted
Average Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options

    

(c) Number of Securities
Remaining 
Available for Future
Issuance 
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected 
in Column (a))

 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders (1)

63,922 

$

14.94 

555,207 

Total

63,922 

$

14.94 

555,207 


(1)Includes the 2012 Plan.

2623


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of  April 24, 2020 by (i) each person who, to the knowledge of the Company, beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of the directors (including the nominees for director), (iii) the Company’s named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Except as indicated, each person listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such person’s name.

Name

    

Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned

    

Percent

 

Directors (including all nominees) and Named Executive Officers

Jeffrey Geygan (1)

145,093 

3.4 

%

Vito Legrottaglie (2)

50,204 

1.2 

%

Dale Foster (3)

47,370 

1.1 

%

Michael Vesey (4)

34,976 

*

Mike Faith (5)

20,000 

*

Charles Bass (6)

17,681 

*

Steve DeWindt (7)

9,500 

*

Diana Kurty (8)

8,504 

*

John McCarthy (9)

2,500 

*

Andy Bryant (10)

2,500 

*

Ross Crane (11)

— 

*

Carol DiBattiste (12)

— 

*

All Directors (including all nominees) and executive officers as a group (11 persons) (13)

328,828 

7.6 

%

Beneficial owners of more than 5% of Common Stock

FMR, LLC (14)

653,276 

15.2 

%

Survivor’s Trust u/a Eighth - E&M Shea Revocable Trust and Descendant’s Trust u/a Tenth - E&M Shea Revocable Trust (15)

292,191 

6.8 

%

Renaissance Technologies LLC (16)

286,796 

6.7 

%


*

Less than one percent

To the Company’s knowledge, except as set forth in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property laws, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned, which are set forth opposite such person’s name. Unless otherwise noted below, the information as to beneficial ownership is based upon statements furnished to the Company by the beneficial owners. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person named above, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, any security that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of calculation is deemed to be outstanding, but such security is not deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

The address for each director and executive officer of the Company is c/o Wayside Technology Group, Inc., 4 Industrial Way West, 3rd Floor, Eatontown, New Jersey 07724.

(1)Mr. Geygan is a member of our Board and our Board Chair. Mr. Geygan owns a total of 11,925 shares of Common Stock, individually. The remaining 133,168 shares are held by Global Value Investment Corp. (“GVIC”). Mr. Geygan is the President and Chief Executive Officer of GVIC and may exercise voting and dispositive power over all such shares held by GVIC. As a result, Mr. Geygan may be deemed to have a beneficial interest in such 133,168 shares held by GVIC.
(2)Includes 19,011 shares of unvested Restricted Stock. Mr. Legrottaglie is our Vice President and Chief Information Officer.

24


(3)Includes 37,990 shares of unvested Restricted Stock. Mr. Foster is a member of our Board and our Chief Executive Officer.
(4)Includes 21,368 shares of unvested Restricted Stock. Mr. Vesey is our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
(5)Includes 2,000 shares held in an Individual Retirement Account. Mr. Faith is a member of our Board.
(6)Includes 12,290 shares of unvested Restricted Stock. Mr. Bass is our Vice President of New Business Development.
(7)Based solely on information provided by Mr. DeWindt in a Form 4 filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019. Mr. DeWindt was formerly a member of our Board and left for personal health reasons effective June 6, 2019, as disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K the Company filed with the SEC on May 31, 2019.
(8)Ms. Kurty is a member of our Board.
(9)Mr. McCarthy is a member of our Board.
(10)Mr. Bryant is a member of our Board.
(11)Mr. Crane is a member of our Board.
(12)Ms. DiBattiste is a director nominee to our Board.
(13)Includes 90,659 shares of unvested Restricted Stock.
(14)Based solely on information provided by FMR LLC in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 7, 2020. The address for FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.
(15)Based on information provided in the most recent proxy questionnaire completed by John C. Morrissey, the trustee for E&M Shea Revocable Trusts. The Survivors u/a Eighth - E&M Shea Revocable Trust holds 146,096 shares with the balance of the shares held in the Descendant’s Trust u/a Tenth - E&M Shea Revocable Trust. The address for the E&M Revocable Trusts is 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, California 91789.
(16)Based solely on information provided by Renaissance Technologies LLC in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020. The address for Renaissance Technologies LLC is 800 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022.


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence

Transactions With Related Persons

The information required hereunderCompany has adopted a written policy whereby all transactions between the Company and each related person (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K) or in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest must be on terms no less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from unrelated third parties and require pre-approval by a majority of the disinterested members of the Board. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company made sales to a customer where John McCarthy is incorporated by reference hereinan executive. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, net sales to this customer totaled $0.1 million for each year, and amounts due from this customer as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled $0.1 million, respectively, which were settled in cash subsequent to each year end. These sales were on terms no less favorable to the Definitive Proxy StatementCompany than could be obtained from unrelated third parties.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that the following directors are independent under the sections captioned “ExecutivesNASDAQ listing standards: Messrs. Faith, Geygan, McCarthy, Bryant and Executive Compensation,” “Corporate Governance”Crane and “Transactions with Related Persons.”Ms. Kurty. The Board has also determined that Ms. DiBattiste, a director nominee not currently serving on the Board, would be considered independent under the NASDAQ listing standards if elected.

26


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Fees and Independence

Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees

The information required hereunderfollowing table sets forth the fees billed by BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 for the categories of services indicated.

Category

    

2019 

    

2018 

 

Audit Fees – (1)

$

240,000 

$

355,000 

Audit-Related Fees – (2)

$

27,224 

$

22,500 

Tax Fees – (3)

$

124,687 

$

97,469 


(1)Consists of fees billed for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, including registration statements and consents.
(2)Consist of services not directly related to the audit of the Company’s financial statements which includes audits of benefit plans.
(3)Consists of services for tax compliance and tax advice for 2019 and 2018.
(4)Includes additional fees billed for the 2018 audit of our annual financial statements that were billed subsequent to the filing of the 2019 proxy statement.

The following table sets forth the fees billed by EisnerAmper LLP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 for the categories of services indicated.

Category

2018 

Audit Fees – (1)

$

25,000 

Audit-Related Fees

$

— 

Tax Fees

$

— 


(1)Consists of fees billed for the review of interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first fiscal quarter of 2018.

The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of services by BDO described in the preceding paragraphs is incorporatedcompatible with maintaining BDO independence. All permissible audit and non-audit services provided by reference herein fromBDO in 2019 and 2018 were pre-approved by the Definitive Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”Audit Committee on a case-by-case basis.

27


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

The following exhibits are being filed herewith:

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

1.

Consolidated Financial Statements (See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report);

2.

Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

3.

Exhibits Required by Regulation S-K, Item 601:

Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

3.1

Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (1)

3.1(a)

Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (2)

3.2

Form of Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company. (1)

4.1

Specimen of Common Stock Certificate. (1)

10.1

Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Loan Agreement, dated November 15, 2017, by and among Wayside Technology Group, Inc., Lifeboat Distribution, Inc., Techxtend, Inc., Programmer’s Paradise, Inc., and ISP International Software Partners, Inc., as Co-Borrowers, and Citibank, N.A., as Lender. (14)

10.2

Second Amended and Restated Credit Loan Note, dated November 15, 2017, by and among Wayside Technology Group, Inc., Lifeboat Distribution, Inc., Techxtend, Inc., Programmer’s Paradise, Inc., and ISP International Software Partners, Inc., as Co-Borrowers, and Citibank, N.A., as Lender.  (14)

10.3

Second Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated November 15, 2017, by and among Wayside Technology Group, Inc., Lifeboat Distribution, Inc., Techxtend, Inc., Programmer’s Paradise, Inc., and ISP International Software Partners, Inc., as Debtors, and Citibank, N.A., as Lender. (14)

10.4

Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement, dated November 15, 2017, by and between Wayside Technology Group, Inc., as Grantor, and Citibank, N.A., as Secured Party. (14)

10.5          

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. (16)

10.6

Employment agreement dated January 3, 2018 between the Company and Dale Foster. (15)

10.7

Employment agreement dated January 2, 2018 between the Company and Charles Bass. (15)

10.8

1995 Stock Plan, as amended. (3)

28


Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

10.9

1995 Non-Employee Director Plan, as amended. (3)

10.9(a)

2006 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. (4)

10.9(b)

First Amendment to 2006 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. (5)

10.9(c)

Second Amendment to 2006 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. (5)

10.10

Form of Officer and Director Indemnification Agreement. (1)

10.11

2012 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (13)

10.13

Employment Agreement, dated January 12, 2006, between the Company and Simon F. Nynens. (6)

10.14

Offer Letter, dated January 6, 2003, from the Company to Vito Legrottaglie. (7)

10.17

Restricted Stock Letter, dated August 15, 2006, between Vito Legrottaglie and Wayside Technology Group, Inc (f/k/a Programmer’s Paradise Inc.). (5)

10.22

Restricted Stock Letter, dated August 15, 2006, between Duff Meyercord and Wayside Technology Group, Inc (f/k/a Programmer’s Paradise Inc.). (5)

10.23

Restricted Stock Letter, dated August 15, 2006, between Simon F. Nynens and Wayside Technology Group, Inc (f/k/a Programmer’s Paradise Inc.). (5)

10.24

Restricted Stock Letter, dated August 15, 2006, between Simon F. Nynens and Wayside Technology Group, Inc (f/k/a Programmer’s Paradise Inc.). (5)

10.25

Restricted Stock Letter, dated August 15, 2006, between Kevin Scull and Wayside Technology Group, Inc (f/k/a Programmer’s Paradise Inc.). (5)

10.28

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement. (5)

10.29

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 5, 2008, between Kevin Scull and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (8)

10.31

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 5, 2008, between Simon Nynens and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (8)

10.32

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 5, 2008, between Vito Legrottaglie and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (8)

10.38

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 5, 2008, between Duff Meyercord and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (8)

10.39

Restricted Stock Letter, dated May 5, 2009, between Simon Nynens and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (9)

10.40

Restricted Stock Letter, dated May 5, 2009, between Kevin Scull and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (9)

29


Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

10.44

Restricted Stock Letter, dated May 5, 2009, between Vito Legrottaglie and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (9)

10.45

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 9, 2010, between Kevin Scull and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (11)

10.47

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 9, 2010, between Simon Nynens and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (11)

10.48

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 9, 2010, between Vito Legrottaglie and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (11)

10.55

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 9, 2010, between Duff Meyercord and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (11)

10.56

Restricted Stock Letter, dated June 6, 2012, between Mike Faith and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (11)

10.59

Restricted Stock Letter, dated May 8, 2012, between Vito Legrottaglie and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (12)

10.61

Restricted Stock Letter, dated February 5, 2013, between Simon F. Nynens and Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (12)

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

23.1

Consent of EisnerAmper LLP

31.1

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of Simon F. Nynens,Dale Foster, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

31.2

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of Michael Vesey, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.Company.

31.3

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of Kevin T. Scull, the Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company.

32.1

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Simon F. Nynens, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. (15)

32.2

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Michael Vesey, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. (15)

32.3

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Kevin T. Scull, the Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company. (15)

30


Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

101

The following financial information from Wayside Technology Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) includes: (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (6) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


(1)

Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits of the same number to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 or amendments thereto (File No. 333-92810).

(2)

Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits of the same number to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on November 3, 2006.

(3)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively, to the Registrant’s Definitive Annual Meeting Proxy Statement filed on April 30, 1998.

(4)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Registrant’s Definitive Annual Meeting Proxy Statement filed on April 28, 2006.

(5)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on March 13, 2008.

(6)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed on May 12, 2006.

(7)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 filed on May 15, 2007.

(8)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended March 31, 2008 filed May 12, 2008.

(9)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended June 30, 2009 filed August 11, 2009.

(10)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended March 31, 2010 filed May 10, 2010.

(11)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Period Ended December 31, 2012 filed February 15, 2013.

(12)

Incorporated by reference to exhibits of the same number filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended March 31, 2013 filed May 1, 2013.

(13)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Registrant’s Definitive Annual Meeting Proxy Statement filed on April 24, 2012.

(14)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2017.

(15)

Furnished herewith.

(16)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2017.

(b)

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are reflected above in Section (a) 3. of this Item.

(c)

The financial statement schedule is included as reflected in Section (a) 2. of this Item.

3128


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized in Eatontown, New Jersey, on March 15, 2018.

April 29, 2020.

WAYSIDE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

By:

/s/ Simon NynensDale Foster

Simon F. Nynens, President and

Dale Foster, Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature

Title

Date

President, Chief Executive Officer and

March 15, 2018

/s/ Simon Nynens

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Simon F. Nynens

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Michael Vesey

Vice President and

March 15, 2018

Michael Vesey

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Kevin Scull

Vice President and

March 15, 2018

Kevin T. Scull

Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Mike Faith

Director

March 15, 2018

Mike Faith

/s/ Steve DeWindt

Director

March 15, 2018

Steve DeWindt

/s/ Diana Kurty

Director

March 15, 2018

Diana Kurty

3229


F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and schedule identified in Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).  In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework  (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 15, 2018 expressed an adverse opinion.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.  Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010

EISNERAMPER LLP

Iselin, New Jersey

March 15, 2018

F-2


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).  In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described in the following paragraph on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework  (2013) issued by COSO.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment. The Company identified several deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of controls which in the aggregate represent a material weakness.  This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of the audit tests applied in our audit of the December 31, 2017 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 15, 2018 on those financial statements.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidated balance sheets of Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and schedule and our report dated March  15, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A Controls and Procedures.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

An entity’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  An entity’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the

F-3


transactions and dispositions of the assets of the entity; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the entity are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the entity; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the entity’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

EISNERAMPER LLP

Iselin, New Jersey

March  15, 2018

F-4


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

5,530

 

$

13,524

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,102 and $2,293, respectively

 

 

76,937

 

 

83,768

 

Inventory, net

 

 

2,794

 

 

2,324

 

Vendor prepayments

 

 

6,837

 

 

 —

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

993

 

 

948

 

Total current assets

 

 

93,091

 

 

100,564

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment and leasehold improvements, net

 

 

1,828

 

 

1,937

 

Accounts receivable-long-term, net

 

 

7,437

 

 

10,668

 

Other assets

 

 

231

 

 

113

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

138

 

 

416

 

 

 

$

102,725

 

$

113,698

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

64,013

 

$

76,087

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

64,013

 

 

76,087

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,284,500 shares issued: 4,454,829 and 4,555,434 shares outstanding, respectively

 

 

53

 

 

53

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

31,257

 

 

30,683

 

Treasury stock, at cost, 829,671 and 729,066 shares, respectively

 

 

(14,207)

 

 

(12,029)

 

Retained earnings

 

 

22,522

 

 

20,515

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(913)

 

 

(1,611)

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

38,712

 

 

37,611

 

 

 

$

102,725

 

$

113,698

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

449,379

 

$

418,131

 

$

382,090

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

 

422,303

 

 

390,800

 

 

355,517

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

27,076

 

 

27,331

 

 

26,573

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

 

19,263

 

 

18,715

 

 

18,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

 

7,813

 

 

8,616

 

 

8,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest, net

 

 

699

 

 

318

 

 

368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)

 

 

41

 

 

(1)

 

 

(20)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 

 

8,553

 

 

8,933

 

 

8,858

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

3,491

 

 

3,032

 

 

3,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,062

 

$

5,901

 

$

5,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income per common share-Basic (Restated) Notes 1 and 2

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income per common share-Diluted (Restated) Notes 1 and 2 

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding — Basic (Restated) Notes 1 and 2

 

 

4,299

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding — Diluted (Restated) Notes 1 and 2

 

 

4,299

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid per common share

 

$

0.68

 

$

0.68

 

$

0.68

 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-6


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,062

 

$

5,901

 

$

5,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

698

 

 

(160)

 

 

(893)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

698

 

 

(160)

 

 

(893)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

5,760

 

$

5,741

 

$

4,937

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-In

 

Treasury

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

   

Shares

   

Amount

   

Capital

   

Shares

   

Amount

   

Earnings

   

(loss) income

   

Total

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

5,284,500

 

$

53

 

$

31,013

 

393,744

 

$

(6,166)

 

$

15,225

 

$

(558)

 

$

39,567

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,830

 

 

 

 

 

5,830

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(893)

 

 

(893)

 

Dividends paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,242)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,242)

 

Stock options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

298

 

(44,640)

 

 

276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

574

 

Share-based compensation Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,213

 

Tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

248

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

248

 

Restricted stock grants (net of forfeitures)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(232)

 

(39,535)

 

 

232

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Treasury shares repurchased

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

274,119

 

 

(4,638)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,638)

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

5,284,500

 

 

53

 

 

32,540

 

583,688

 

 

(10,296)

 

 

17,813

 

 

(1,451)

 

 

38,659

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,901

 

 

 

 

 

5,901

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

(160)

 

 

(160)

 

Dividends paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,199)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,199)

 

Share-based compensation Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,673

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,673

 

Tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

141

 

Restricted stock grants (net of forfeitures)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,671)

 

(164,085)

 

 

3,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Treasury shares repurchased

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

309,463

 

 

(5,404)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,404)

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

5,284,500

 

 

53

 

 

30,683

 

729,066

 

 

(12,029)

 

 

20,515

 

 

(1,611)

 

 

37,611

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,062

 

 

 

 

 

5,062

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

698

 

 

698

 

Dividends paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,055)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,055)

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,350

 

Restricted stock grants (net of forfeitures)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(776)

 

(64,382)

 

 

776

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Treasury shares repurchased

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

164,987

 

 

(2,954)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,954)

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

5,284,500

 

$

53

 

$

31,257

 

829,671

 

$

(14,207)

 

$

22,522

 

$

(913)

 

$

38,712

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

F-8


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,062

 

$

5,901

 

$

5,830

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

 

477

 

 

296

 

 

253

 

(Benefit) provision for doubtful accounts receivable

 

 

(95)

 

 

(73)

 

 

13

 

Deferred income tax expense

 

 

278

 

 

105

 

 

(43)

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

1,512

 

 

1,673

 

 

1,213

 

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

 

 

 —

 

 

12

 

 

 —

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

10,710

 

 

(27,939)

 

 

1,085

 

Inventory

 

 

(461)

 

 

(361)

 

 

(481)

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(35)

 

 

42

 

 

(72)

 

Vendor prepayments

 

 

(6,837)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(12,507)

 

 

19,862

 

 

322

 

Other assets

 

 

(125)

 

 

(34)

 

 

65

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 

 

(2,021)

 

 

(516)

 

 

8,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements

 

 

(359)

 

 

(1,040)

 

 

(200)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(359)

 

 

(1,040)

 

 

(200)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

(2,954)

 

 

(5,404)

 

 

(4,638)

 

Proceeds from stock option exercise

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

574

 

Tax benefit from share-based compensation

 

 

 —

 

 

141

 

 

213

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(3,055)

 

 

(3,199)

 

 

(3,242)

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(6,009)

 

 

(8,462)

 

 

(7,093)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash

 

 

395

 

 

(281)

 

 

(193)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(7,994)

 

 

(10,299)

 

 

699

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

13,524

 

 

23,823

 

 

23,124

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

5,530

 

$

13,524

 

$

23,823

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

2,437

 

$

2,559

 

$

3,191

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leasehold improvements funded by tenant allowance

 

$

-

 

$

840

 

$

-

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-9


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Note 1.  Description of Business

Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”), was incorporated in Delaware in 1982.  The Company distributes software developed by others to resellers who in turn sell to end customers worldwide. The Company also resells computer software and hardware developed by others and provides technical services directly to customers in the United States of America (“USA”) and Canada. The Company also operates a sales branch in Europe to serve our customers in this region of the world.  The Company offers an extensive line of products from leading publishers of software and tools for virtualization/cloud computing, security, networking, storage & infrastructure management, application lifecycle management and other technically sophisticated domains as well as computer hardware.

The Company is organized into two reportable operating segments. The “Lifeboat Distribution” segment distributes technical software to corporate resellers, value added resellers (VARs), consultants and systems integrators worldwide.  The “TechXtend” segment is a value-added reseller of software, hardware and services for corporations, government organizations and academic institutions in the USA and Canada.

Restatement of Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share two-class method

Earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 has been recalculated and restated using the two-class method and presented on a comparable basis with 2017. In 2017 the Company determined it should be reporting earnings per share using the two-class method in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC’) 260-10-45-60, which treats unvested restricted shares granted under our 2012 Stock-Based Compensation Plan that are entitled to receive non-forfeitable dividends as participating securities. While the Company has determined the impact of applying the two-class method does not have a material impact on previously issued financial statements, it is appropriate to recalculate and restate amounts presented on a comparative and consistent basis with current period results. The table below summarizes previously reported and restated amounts on a comparative basis. See footnote 2, Earnings Per Share for more detail on the impact of the two-class method calculation on previously reported earnings per share.

F-10


5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

    

December 31,

 

 

2016

 

2015

As Previously Reported:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income per common share - Basic

 

$

1.31

 

$

1.26

Income per common share - Diluted

 

$

1.31

 

$

1.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted

 

 

4,514

 

 

4,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As Restated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Income per common share - Basic

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 Income per common share - Diluted

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

Note 2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Operations

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires management to make extensive use of certain estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The significant areas of estimation include but are not limited to accounting for allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns, discount rates applicable to long term receivables, inventory obsolescence, income taxes, depreciation, contingencies and stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Net Income Per Common Share

Our basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method that determines net income per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to their participation rights in dividends and undistributed earnings or losses. Non-vested restricted stock awards that include non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities. Per share amounts are computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each period. Diluted and basic earnings per share are the same because the restricted shares are the only potentially dilutive security.

F-11


A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,062

 

$

5,901

 

$

5,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less distributed and undistributed income allocated to participating securities

 

 

222

 

 

251

 

 

159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders

 

 

4,840

 

 

5,650

 

 

5,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares (Basic)

 

 

4,299

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares including assumed conversions (Diluted)

 

 

4,299

 

 

4,503

 

 

4,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income per share -restated

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

Diluted net income per share-restated

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.22

 

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all liquid short-term investments with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable principally represents amounts collectible from our customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers but generally does not require collateral to support any outstanding obligation.

Allowance for Accounts Receivable

We provide allowances for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We take into consideration the overall quality and aging of the receivable portfolio along with specifically identified customer risks. If actual customer payment performance were to deteriorate to an extent not expected, additional allowances may be required.  At the time of sale, we record an estimate for sales returns based on historical experience. If actual sales returns are greater than estimated by management, additional expense may be incurred.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have been translated using the end of the reporting period exchange rates, and related revenues and expenses have been translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the period.  Cumulative translation adjustments have been classified within accumulated other comprehensive income, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity in accordance FASB ASC Topic No. 220, “Comprehensive Income”. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded as income or expenses as amounts are settled.

F-12


Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations in credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are deposited primarily in banking institutions with global operations.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, because of the relative short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s accounts receivable long-term is discounted to their present value at prevailing market rates at the time of sale which approximates fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Inventory

Inventory, consisting primarily of finished products held for resale, is stated at the lower of cost (weighted average) or market.

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Equipment depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms, whichever is shorter.

Accounts Receivable-Long-Term

Accounts receivable-long-term result from product sales with extended payment terms that are discounted to their present values at the prevailing market rates at the time of sale. In subsequent periods, the accounts receivable are increased to the amounts due and payable by the customers through the accretion of interest income on the unpaid accounts receivable due in future years. The amounts under these long-term accounts receivable due within one year are reclassified to the current portion of accounts receivable.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications and immaterial revisions have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current-year presentation.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income for the period and the impact of unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments. The foreign currency translation adjustments are not currently adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent investments in international subsidiaries.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue on product (software and hardware) and maintenance and subscription agreement sales are recognized once four criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) the price is fixed and determinable, (3) delivery (software and hardware) or fulfillment (maintenance and subscription) has occurred, and (4) there is

F-13


reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. Revenues from the sales of hardware products, software products and licenses, are recognized on a gross basis upon transfer of title with the selling price to the customer recorded as sales and the acquisition cost of the product recorded as cost of sales.

Product delivery to customers occur in a variety of ways, including (i) as physical product shipped from the Company’s warehouse, (ii) via drop-shipment by the vendor, or (iii) via electronic delivery for software licenses.  The Company leverages drop-ship arrangements with many of its vendors and suppliers to deliver products to customers without having to physically hold the inventory at its warehouse, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing costs.  The Company recognizes revenue for drop-ship arrangements on a gross basis.  Furthermore, in such drop-ship arrangements, the Company negotiates price with the customer, pays the supplier directly for the product shipped and bears credit risk of collecting payment from its customers. Maintenance and subscription agreements allow customers to access software and obtain technical support directly from the software publisher and to upgrade, at no additional cost, to the latest technology if new applications are introduced by the software publisher during the period that the maintenance and subscription agreement is in effect. The Company recognizes the sales and cost of sales of the product upon receiving notification from the vendor that the product has been shipped to the contract fulfilled.

Sales are recorded net of discounts, rebates, and returns.  Vendor rebates and price protection are recorded when earned as a reduction to cost of sales or merchandise inventory, as applicable.

Cooperative reimbursements from vendors, which are earned and available, are recorded in the period the related advertising expenditure is incurred. Cooperative reimbursements are recorded as a reduction of cost of sales in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-50 “Accounting by a Customer (including reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.”  Provisions for returns are estimated based on historical sales returns and credit memo analysis which are adjusted to actual on a periodic basis.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stockholder-approved stock incentive plans for employees and directors. Stock- based compensation is recognized based on the grant date fair value and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period.

Interest, net

Interest, net consists primarily of income from the amortization of the discount on accounts receivable long term, net of interest expense on the Company’s credit facility.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. This method also requires a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset if, based on the weighted available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense when assessed. The Company accounts for uncertainties in accordance with FASB ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. This standard clarified the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes. The standard prescribes criteria for recognition and measurement of tax positions. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and disclosures related to income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions. The Company classifies all deferred tax asset or liabilities as non-current on the balance sheet in accordance with ASU 2015-17 which the Company has adopted.

F-14


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. In March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued additional updates to the new accounting standard which provide supplemental adoption guidance and clarifications. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue in order to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard will also result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers.

The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, and early adoption as of January 1, 2017 is permitted.

The Company elected to adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method, which will require the Company to recast its historical financial information for 2017 and 2016 to be consistent with the standard. The most significant impact of adopting the standard relates to the determination of whether the Company is acting as a principal or an agent in the sale of third party security software and software that is highly interdependent with support, as well as maintenance, support and other services. Historically, under the transfer of risk and rewards model of revenue recognition, the Company has accounted for primarily all of its sales on a gross basis. The new guidance requires the Company to identify performance obligations and assess transfer of control. While assessing its performance obligations for sales of security software and software subscriptions that are highly interdependent with support, the Company determined that the vendor has ongoing performance obligations with the end customer that are not separately identifiable from the software itself. The Company also determined that the vendor has ongoing performance obligation for sales of certain third-party maintenance, support and service contracts. In these instances, under the new guidance, the Company has determined that it does not have control and is acting as an agent in the sale. When acting as an agent in a transaction, the Company accounts for sales on a net basis, with the vendor cost associated with the sale recognized as a reduction of revenue. The change from gross sale to net reporting has no impact on gross profit, net income or cash flows.  

The adoption of the standard is expected to result in a reduction of reported revenue of $288.8 million, $253.5 million and $218.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The adoption is not expected to have any impact on income from operations or the Company’s balance sheet.

F-15


The tables below present historical information adjusted as if the standard had been adopted on January 1, 2015 for all periods presented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

 

Adjusted

Net Sales

 

$

449,379

 

$

(288,812)

 

$

160,567

Cost of Sales

 

 

422,303

 

 

(288,812)

 

 

133,491

Gross profit

 

$

27,076

 

$

 —

 

$

27,076

Income from operations

 

$

7,813

 

$

 —

 

$

7,813

Net Income

 

$

5,062

 

$

 —

 

$

5,062

Basic and diluted income per common share

 

$

1.13

 

$

 —

 

$

1.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

Adjusted

Net Sales

 

$

418,131

 

$

(253,522)

 

$

164,609

Cost of Sales

 

 

390,800

 

 

(253,522)

 

 

137,278

Gross profit

 

$

27,331

 

$

 —

 

$

27,331

Income from operations

 

$

8,616

 

$

 —

 

$

8,616

Net Income

 

$

5,901

 

$

 —

 

$

5,901

Basic and diluted income per common share

 

$

1.25

 

$

 —

 

$

1.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

Adjusted

Net Sales

 

$

382,090

 

$

(218,356)

 

$

163,734

Cost of Sales

 

 

355,517

 

 

(218,356)

 

 

137,161

Gross profit

 

$

26,573

 

$

 —

 

$

26,573

Income from operations

 

$

8,510

 

$

 —

 

$

8,510

Net Income

 

$

5,830

 

$

 —

 

$

5,830

Basic and diluted income per common share

 

$

1.22

 

$

 —

 

$

1.22

Disaggregation of Revenue

The Company expects to report the following categories of revenue in its disaggregation of revenue disclosure under the new standard.

Hardware and software product — Hardware product consists of sales of hardware manufactured by third parties. Hardware product is delivered from our warehouse or drop shipped from the vendor. Revenue from our hardware products is recognized on a gross basis upon transfer of control to our customers as we control the product prior to delivery and are responsible for handling any returns of the product. Software product consists of sales of perpetual and term software licenses developed by third party vendors. Software licenses are delivered via electronic license keys provided by the vendor to the end user. Revenue from our software products is recognized on a gross basis

F-16


upon transfer of control to our customers as a functional product is delivered at that time, the Company controls the product prior to delivery and is responsible for handling any returns of the product.

Software - security and highly interdependent with support — Software - security software and software highly interdependent with support consists of sales of security subscriptions and other products whose functionality is highly interdependent on updates and support services delivered directly by the third-party vendor to the end user. Revenue from our software-security and highly interdependent with support products is recognized on a net basis upon fulfillment to our customers as the Company is not responsible for providing future updates that are critical to the functionality of the software and our performance obligation is complete at the time of delivery.

Maintenance, support and other services revenue— We generate our maintenance, support and other services revenue primarily from third-party post-contract support arrangements, and, to a lesser extent, from third-party professional services and software as a service subscription. The service period typically commences upon transfer of control of the corresponding products to our customer. Revenue from maintenance, support and other service revenues is recognized on a net basis upon fulfillment to our customers as the Company does not provide the services and our performance obligation is complete at that time.

Contracts with multiple performance obligations— Some of our contracts with customers contain multiple performance obligations. For these contracts, we account for individual performance obligations separately if they are distinct. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations based on relative standalone selling prices.

F-17


The expected impact to reported results, by disaggregated revenue category, as if adoption of .the new revenue recognition standard occurred on January 1, 2015 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

Adjusted

Hardware and software product

 

$

143,920

 

$

 -

 

$

143,920

Software - security & highly interdependent with support

 

 

120,806

 

 

(114,867)

 

 

5,939

Maintenance, support & other services

 

 

184,653

 

 

(173,945)

 

 

10,708

Net sales

 

 

449,379

 

 

(288,812)

 

 

160,567

Cost of sales

 

 

422,303

 

 

(288,812)

 

 

133,491

Gross profit

 

$

27,076

 

$

 -

 

 

27,076

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

Adjusted

Hardware and software product

 

$

148,949

 

$

0

 

$

148,949

Software - security & highly interdependent with support

 

 

95,438

 

 

(90,522)

 

 

4,916

Maintenance, support & other services

 

 

173,744

 

 

(163,000)

 

 

10,744

Net sales

 

 

418,131

 

 

(253,522)

 

 

164,609

Cost of sales

 

 

390,800

 

 

(253,522)

 

 

137,278

Gross profit

 

$

27,331

 

$

-

 

$

27,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

Adopted

Hardware and software product

 

$

148,444

 

$

 -

 

$

148,444

Software - security & highly interdependent with support

 

 

77,100

 

 

(73,192)

 

 

3,908

Maintenance, support & other services

 

 

156,546

 

 

(145,164)

 

 

11,382

Net sales

 

 

382,090

 

 

(218,356)

 

 

163,734

Cost of sales

 

 

355,517

 

 

(218,356)

 

 

137,161

Gross profit

 

$

26,573

 

$

 -

 

$

26,573

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330)", ("ASU 2015-11"). Topic 330, Inventory, currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market, with market value represented by replacement cost, net realizable value or net realizable value less a normal profit margin. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 require an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We adopted ASU 2015-11 during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for

F-18


share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09 related to the recognition of excess tax benefits in the income statement and classification in the statement of cash flows on a prospective basis and the prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures of share-based awards when they occur in determining compensation cost to be recognized each period. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease guidance under FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 840, Leases, resulting in the creation of FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize for all leases with terms longer than 12 months in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term for both finance and operating leases. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) ("ASU No. 2016-13"). ASU No. 2016-13 replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments requiring consideration for a broader range of information in determining timing of when such losses are recorded. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effects of adopting the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 on it consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-15”) ASU 2016-15 which reduces diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard will become effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” This amendment is intended to improve accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. In accordance with this guidance, an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted in fiscal 2018 with modified retrospective application. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Scope of Modification Accounting”, to reduce diversity in practice and provide clarity regarding existing guidance in ASC 718, “Stock Compensation”. The amendments in this updated guidance clarify that an entity should apply modification accounting in response to a change in the terms and conditions of an entity’s share-based payment awards unless three newly specified criteria are met. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the potential impacts of this updated guidance, and it does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) –Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. The amendments in this update also make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current GAAP. ASU No. 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years; the ASU allows for early adoption in any interim period after issuance of the update. The company is currently assessing the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

F-19


3.  Balance Sheet Detail

Equipment and leasehold improvements, net consist of the following as of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Equipment

 

$

1,988

 

$

1,638

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

1,335

 

 

1,317

 

 

 

 

3,323

 

 

2,955

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(1,495)

 

 

(1,018)

 

 

 

$

1,828

 

$

1,937

 

During 2016, the Company wrote off $2.4 million in fully depreciated leasehold improvements and equipment primarily used in our former corporate headquarters which we relocated from in October 2016.

Accounts receivable – long term, net consist of the following as of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Total amount due from customer

 

$

20,886

 

$

25,974

 

Less discount

 

 

(912)

 

 

(908)

 

Less current portion included in accounts receivable, current

 

 

(12,537)

 

 

(14,398)

 

 

 

$

7,437

 

$

10,668

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following as of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Trade accounts payable

 

$

60,131

 

$

72,093

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

3,882

 

 

3,994

 

 

 

$

64,013

 

$

76,087

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) consists of the following as of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

    

2016

    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

$

(913)

 

$

(1,611)

 

 

 

$

(913)

 

$

(1,611)

 

4.  Income Taxes

Deferred tax attributes resulting from differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accruals and reserves

 

$

331

 

$

546

 

Deferred rent credit

 

 

161

 

 

283

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(354)

 

 

(413)

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

$

138

 

$

416

 

F-20


The provision for income taxes is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

2,253

 

$

2,515

 

$

2,779

 

State

 

 

552

 

 

55

 

 

61

 

Foreign

 

 

408

 

 

357

 

 

231

 

 

 

 

3,213

 

 

2,927

 

 

3,071

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

273

 

 

102

 

 

(40)

 

State

 

 

 5

 

 

 3

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

278

 

 

105

 

 

(43)

 

 

 

$

3,491

 

$

3,032

 

$

3,028

 

Effective Tax Rate

 

 

40.8

%  

 

33.9

%  

 

34.2

%

The reasons for the difference between total tax expense and the amount computed by applying the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Statutory rate applied to pretax income

 

$

2,908

 

$

3,037

 

$

3,012

 

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

 

36

 

 

36

 

 

39

 

Potential state tax obligations, net of federal tax benefit

 

 

375

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Impact of new tax law

 

 

189

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Foreign income taxes under U.S. statutory rate

 

 

(70)

 

 

(64)

 

 

(44)

 

Other items

 

 

53

 

 

23

 

 

21

 

Income tax expense

 

$

3,491

 

$

3,032

 

$

3,028

 

The Company receives a tax deduction from the income realized by employees on the exercise of certain non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards for which the tax effect of the difference between the book and tax deduction is recognized as a component of current income tax.

The Company has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The Company has identified its federal consolidated tax return and its state tax return in New Jersey and its Canadian tax return as major tax jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s 2014 through 2016 Federal tax returns remain open for examination, as the Company recently concluded an Internal Revenue Service examination for the 2011 and 2012 tax years. This examination resulted in no change to the previously filed Federal corporate tax returns.  The Company’s New Jersey and Canadian tax returns are open for examination for the years 2014 through 2016. During 2017, the Company recorded an accrual of $0.4 million, net of federal tax benefit, for potential liabilities for state income taxes in states which have enacted economic nexus statutes and the Company has not filed income tax returns.  The Company’s policy is to recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and penalties as operating expenses. The Company believes that it has appropriate support for the income tax positions it takes and expects to take on its tax returns, and that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter.

F-21


For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes includes the following components:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

United States

 

$

6,929

 

$

7,514

 

$

7,937

 

Foreign

 

 

1,624

 

 

1,419

 

 

921

 

 

 

$

8,553

 

$

8,933

 

$

8,858

 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and introduces significant changes to the U.S. income tax law.  Effective in 2018, the Tax Act reduces U.S. statutory tax rates from 34% to 21%. Accordingly, we remeasured our deferred taxes as of December 31, 2017 to reflect the reduced rate that will apply in future periods when these deferred taxes are settled or realized, resulting in a one-time $0.1 million net tax expense in 2017.

Due to the timing of the enactment and the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we have made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our financial statements as of December 31, 2017.  As we collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret the Tax Act and any additional guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and other standard-setting bodies, we may make adjustments to the provisional amounts.  Those adjustments may materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate in the period in which adjustments are made.  The accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act will be completed in 2018.

5.  Credit Facility

On November 15, 2017, the Company entered into a $20,000,000 revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) pursuant to a Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Loan Note (the “Note”), Second Amended and Restated Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) and Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement (the “Pledge Agreement”).  The Credit Facility, which will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, matures on August 31, 2020, at which time the Company must pay all outstanding principal of all outstanding loans plus all accrued and unpaid interest, and any, fees, costs and expenses. In addition, the Company will pay regular monthly payments of all accrued and unpaid interest.  The interest rate for any borrowings under the Credit Facility is subject to change from time to time based on the changes in the LIBOR Rate, as defined in the Loan Agreement (the “Index”).  The Index was 1.56% at December 31, 2017. Interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Note will be calculated using a rate of 1.50 percentage points over the Index.  If the Index becomes unavailable during the term of the Credit Facility, interest will be based upon the Prime Rate (as defined in the Loan Agreement) after notifying the Company.  The Credit Facility is secured by the assets of the Company.

Among other affirmative covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement, the Company must maintain (i) a minimum Debt Service Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) of not less than 2.0 to 1.0, (ii) a maximum Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) of at least 2.5 to 1.0, and (iii) a minimum Collateral Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) of not less than 1.5 to 1.0.  Additionally, the Loan Agreement contains negative covenants prohibiting, among other things, the creation of certain liens, the alteration of the nature or character of the Company’s business, and transactions with the Company’s shareholders, directors, officers, subsidiaries and/or affiliates other than with respect to (i) the repurchase of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company from the stockholders of the Company  or (ii) the declaration and payment of dividends to the stockholders of the Company.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.  The Company incurred $ 0.1 million of interest expense, related to the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no interest expense for 2016 and 2015.

F-22


6.  Stockholders’ Equity and Stock Based Compensation

At the annual stockholder’s meeting held on June 14, 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2006 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan authorizes the grant of Stock Options, Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock, Stock Bonuses, and other equity-based awards. The number of shares of Common Stock initially available under the 2006 Plan was 800,000.  As of December 31, 2017, there are no shares of common stock available for future award grants to employees and directors under this plan.

At the annual stockholder’s meeting held on June 6, 2012, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2012 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”). The 2012 Plan authorizes the grant of Stock Options, Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock, Stock Bonuses and other equity-based awards. The total number of shares of Common Stock initially available for award under the 2012 Plan was 600,000.  As of December 31, 2017, the number of shares of Common stock available for future award grants to employees and directors under the 2012 Plan is 245,846.

During 2016, the Company granted a total of 171,252 shares of Restricted Stock to officers, directors and employees. These shares of Restricted Stock vest between twelve and twenty equal quarterly installments.  In 2016, a total of 7,167 shares of Restricted Stock were forfeited as a result of directors and employees terminating employment with the Company.

During 2017, the Company granted a total of 87,076 shares of Restricted Stock to officers, and employees. These shares of Restricted Stock vest between twelve and twenty equal quarterly installments.  In 2017, a total of 22,694 shares of Restricted Stock were forfeited as a result of directors and employees terminating employment with the Company.

Changes during 2016 and 2017 of options outstanding under the Company’s combined plans (i.e. the 2012 Plan, the 2006 Plan) were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

Number

 

Average

 

 

 

of

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Options

 

Price

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2016

 

50,640

 

 

12.85

 

Granted in 2016

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Canceled in 2016

 

6,000

 

 

12.85

 

Exercised in 2016

 

44,640

 

 

12.85

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Granted in 2017

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Canceled in 2017

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Exercised in 2017

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

There were no options exercisable at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Under the various plans, options that are cancelled can be reissued. At December 31, 2017, no options were reserved for future issuance.

F-23


A summary of nonvested shares of Restricted Stock awards outstanding under the Company’s 2006 Plan and 2012 Plan as of December 31, 2017, and 2016 and changes during the years ended December 31, 2017, and 2016 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant

 

 

 

 

 

Date

 

 

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

 

Nonvested shares at January 1, 2016

 

123,329

 

$

16.34

 

Granted in 2016

 

171,252

 

 

17.03

 

Vested in 2016

 

(101,333)

 

 

14.57

 

Forfeited in 2016

 

(7,167)

 

 

15.98

 

Nonvested shares at December 31, 2016

 

186,081

 

$

15.58

 

Granted in 2017

 

87,076

 

 

18.25

 

Vested in 2017

 

(88,645)

 

 

15.23

 

Forfeited in 2017

 

(22,694)

 

 

15.50

 

Nonvested shares at December 31, 2017

 

161,818

 

$

15.98

 

As of December 31, 2017, there was approximately $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized share-based compensation cost of approximately $1.5 million, $1.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.  The Company does not capitalize any share-based compensation cost.

7.  Defined Contribution Plan

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan covering substantially all domestic employees. Participating employees may make contributions to the plan, through payroll deductions. Matching contributions are made by the Company equal to 50% of the employee’s contribution to the extent such employee contribution did not exceed 6% of their compensation.  During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company expensed approximately $237 thousand, $211 thousand and $211 thousand, respectively, related to this plan.

8.  Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

Operating leases primarily relate to the lease of the space used for our operations in Eatontown, New Jersey, Mesa, Arizona, Mississauga, Canada and Amsterdam, Netherlands. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

2018

    

$

508

 

2019

 

 

460

 

2020

 

 

438

 

2021

 

 

405

 

2022

 

 

414

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,035

 

 

 

$

4,260

 

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $509 thousand, $455 thousand and $327 thousand, respectively.

F-24


Employment Agreements

In the event that Simon Nynens, President and Chief Executive officer, employment is terminated without cause or by the rendering of a non-renewal notification, he is entitled to receive a severance payment equal to twelve months cash compensation, immediate vesting of all outstanding equity awards, and to purchase the car used by him at the “buy-out” price of any lease or fair market value, as applicable. Additionally, in the event that a change of control of the Company occurs (as described in the employment agreement), Mr. Nynens’ outstanding equity awards become immediately vested and he is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to 2.9 times his then annual salary and actual incentive bonus earned in the year prior to such change in control.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with its Senior Vice President, Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Vice President New Business Development, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, under which they are entitled to a severance payment and severance payments, respectively for six months at the then applicable annual base salary if the Company terminates their respective employment for any reason other than for cause.

The Executive Vice President and Vice President New Business Development are also entitled to receive continuation of certain employee benefits and their outstanding equity awards become immediately vested if the Company terminates their respective employment for any reason other than for cause.

Additionally, in the event that a change of control of the Company occurs (as described in the employment agreement), the Chief Financial Officer’s outstanding equity awards become immediately vested and he is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to 1.0 times his then annual salary and actual incentive bonus earned in the year prior to such change in control.

Other

As of December 31, 2017, the Company has no standby letters of credit, has no standby repurchase obligations or other commercial commitments. The Company has a line of credit see Note 5 (Credit Facility). Other than employment arrangements and other management compensation arrangements, the Company is not engaged in any transactions with related parties.

9.  Industry, Segment and Geographic Information

The Company distributes software developed by others through resellers indirectly to customers worldwide.  We also resell computer software and hardware developed by others and provide technical services directly to customers in the USA and Canada.  We also operate a sales branch in Europe to serve our customers in this region of the world.

Geographic revenue and identifiable assets related to operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows. Revenue is allocated to a geographic area based on the location of the sale, which is generally the customer’s country of domicile.  No one country other than the USA represents more than 10% of net sales for 2017, 2016 or 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Net sales to Unaffiliated Customers:

 

 

              

 

 

              

 

 

              

 

USA

 

$

389,925

 

$

364,989

 

$

336,110

 

Canada

 

 

30,289

 

 

28,491

 

 

23,957

 

Rest of the world

 

 

29,165

 

 

24,651

 

 

22,023

 

Total

 

$

449,379

 

$

418,131

 

$

382,090

 

F-25


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Identifiable Assets by Geographic Areas at December 31,

 

 

               

 

 

               

 

 

               

 

USA

 

$

95,516

 

$

106,014

 

$

87,679

 

Canada

 

 

7,209

 

 

7,684

 

 

6,403

 

Total

 

$

102,725

 

$

113,698

 

$

94,082

 

FASB ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting,” requires that public companies report profits and losses and certain other information on their “reportable operating segments” in their annual and interim financial statements. The internal organization used by the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) to assess performance and allocate resources determines the basis for reportable operating segments. The Company’s CODM is the Chief Executive Officer.

The Company is organized into two reportable operating segments.  The “Lifeboat Distribution” segment distributes technical software to corporate resellers, value added resellers (VARs), consultants and systems integrators worldwide.  The “TechXtend” segment is a value-added reseller of software, hardware and services for corporations, government organizations and academic institutions in the USA and Canada.

As permitted by FASB ASC Topic 280, the Company has utilized the aggregation criteria in combining its operations in Canada with the domestic segments as they provide the same products and services to similar clients and are considered together when the CODM decides how to allocate resources.

Segment income is based on segment revenue less the respective segment’s cost of revenues as well as segment direct costs (including such items as payroll costs and payroll related costs, such as profit sharing, incentive awards and insurance) and excluding general and administrative expenses not attributed to a business unit. The Company only identifies accounts receivable and inventory by segment as shown below as “Selected Assets” by segment; it does not allocate its other assets, including capital expenditures by segment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  

2017

  

2016

  

2015

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lifeboat Distribution

 

$

417,427

 

$

369,519

 

$

339,708

TechXtend

 

 

31,952

 

 

48,612

 

 

42,382

 

 

 

449,379

 

 

418,131

 

 

382,090

Gross Profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lifeboat Distribution

 

$

23,183

 

$

22,349

 

$

21,530

TechXtend

 

 

3,893

 

 

4,982

 

 

5,043

 

 

 

27,076

 

 

27,331

 

 

26,573

Direct Costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lifeboat Distribution

 

$

7,952

 

$

7,478

 

$

7,719

TechXtend

 

 

1,879

 

 

2,098

 

 

2,269

 

 

 

9,831

 

 

9,576

 

 

9,988

Segment Income Before Taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lifeboat Distribution

 

$

15,231

 

$

14,871

 

$

13,811

TechXtend

 

 

2,014

 

 

2,884

 

 

2,774

Segment Income Before Taxes

 

 

17,245

 

 

17,755

 

 

16,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

$

9,432

 

$

9,139

 

$

8,075

Interest, net

 

 

699

 

 

318

 

 

368

Foreign currency translation

 

 

41

 

 

(1)

 

 

(20)

Income before taxes

 

$

8,553

 

$

8,933

 

$

8,858

F-26


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of 

    

As of 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

Selected Assets By Segment:

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lifeboat Distribution

 

$

72,806

 

$

64,558

 

TechXtend

 

 

21,200

 

 

32,202

 

Segment Select Assets

 

 

94,006

 

 

96,760

 

Corporate Assets

 

 

8,719

 

 

16,938

 

Total Assets

 

$

102,725

 

$

113,698

 

The Company had two customers that each accounted for more than 10% of total sales for 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Software House International Corporation (SHI”), and CDW Corporation (“CDW”) accounted for 23.0%, and 19.4%, respectively, of consolidated net sales and, as of December 31, 2017,  15.1% and 28.6%,  respectively, of total net accounts receivable. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Sophos and Solarwinds accounted for 26.4% and 14.7%, respectively of our consolidated purchases. 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, SHI, and CDW accounted for 19.6%, and 17.9%, respectively, of consolidated net sales. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Sophos and Solarwinds accounted for 23.1% and 10.8%, respectively of our consolidated purchases.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, SHI, and CDW accounted for 19.0%, and 17.9%, respectively, of consolidated net sales. For the year ended December 31, 2015, Sophos was the only individual vendor from whom our purchases exceeded 10% of our total purchases and accounted for 24.2% of our total purchases. 

 Our top five customers accounted for 52%, 48%, and 52% of consolidated net sales in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

10.  Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following table presents summarized quarterly results for 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

  

Net sales

 

$

112,795

 

$

102,982

 

$

106,646

 

$

126,956

 

Gross profit

 

 

6,758

 

 

6,572

 

 

6,244

 

 

7,502

 

Net income

 

 

1,319

 

 

1,273

 

 

1,341

 

 

1,128

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income per common share-(restated)

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.25

 

Diluted net income per common share-(restated)

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table presents summarized quarterly results for 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

  

Net sales

 

$

93,323

 

$

105,257

 

$

99,586

 

$

119,965

 

Gross profit

 

 

5,953

 

 

7,000

 

 

6,372

 

 

8,006

 

Net income

 

 

1,029

 

 

1,527

 

 

1,378

 

 

1,967

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income per common share-(restated)

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.43

 

Diluted net income per common share-(restated)

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.43

 

F-27


The  following table presents the expected quarterly impact on net sales of the adoption of ASC 606 Revenue From Contracts With Customers (See Note 2) for the year ended  December 31, 2017 and 2016, as if adoption of the  new standard  occurred on January 1, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended  December 31, 2017

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

 

Adjusted

Quarter:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

$

112,795

 

$

(74,704)

 

$

38,091

Second

 

 

102,982

 

 

(63,961)

 

 

39,021

Third

 

 

106,646

 

 

(67,627)

 

 

39,019

Fourth

 

 

126,956

 

 

(82,520)

 

 

44,436

Total net sales

 

$

449,379

 

$

(288,812)

 

$

160,567

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended  December 31, 2016

 

 

As

 

Expected Impact

 

As

 

 

Reported

 

of Adoption

 

 

Adjusted

Quarter:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

$

93,323

 

$

(58,141)

 

$

35,182

Second

 

 

105,257

 

 

(58,989)

 

 

46,268

Third

 

 

99,586

 

 

(60,981)

 

 

38,605

Fourth

 

 

119,965

 

 

(75,411)

 

 

44,554

Total net sales

 

$

418,131

 

$

(253,522)

 

$

164,609

F-28


Wayside Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Charged to 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Cost and 

 

 

 

 

Ending 

 

Description

 

Balance

 

Expense

 

Deductions

 

Balance

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowances for accounts receivable

 

$

1,819

 

$

(181)

 

$

(30)

 

$

1,668

 

Reserve for inventory obsolescence

 

$

10

 

$

13

 

$

 7

 

$

16

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowances for accounts receivable

 

$

1,668

 

$

644

 

$

19

 

$

2,293

 

Reserve for inventory obsolescence

 

$

16

 

$

 3

 

$

 4

 

$

15

 

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowances for accounts receivable

 

$

2,293

 

$

(178)

 

$

13

 

$

2,102

 

Reserve for inventory obsolescence

 

$

15

 

$

 —

 

$

 3

 

$

12

 

F-29