guarding our valuable reputation and creating long-term and sustainable value for our company through a robust business model and attentiveness to our many stakeholders. S|T|O|R|E is committed to playing an important role for middle-market and larger companies across the U.S. in order to help them succeed, while making a positive impact on our collective communities, both today and for future generations.

2021 Highlights

Our Target Market and Asset Class

We are a leader in providingprovide real estate financing solutions principally to middle-market and larger businesses that own single tenant profit-center real estate locations on which they conduct their businesses and generate revenues and profits, which we refer to as Single Tenant Operational Real Estate or “STORE Properties.” Our customers operate these STORE Properties and operate within the broad-based service, service-oriented retail and manufacturing sectors of the U.S. economy. We have designed our net-lease solutions to provide a long-term, lower-costcost efficient way to improve our customers’ capital structures and, thus, be a preferred alternative to real estate ownership. We estimate the market for STORE Properties to approximate $3.9 trillion in market value and to include more than 2.0 million properties.

We define middle-market companies as those having approximate annual gross revenues of between $10 million and $1.0 billion, although approximately 21% of our customers have annual revenues in excess of $1.0 billion. At December 31, 2021, the median annual revenues of our 556 customers was approximately $62 million and, on a weighted average basis, our average customer had revenues of approximately $1 billion. Most of our customers do not have credit ratings, although some have ratings from rating agencies that service insurance companies or fixed-income investors. Most of these non-rated companies either prefer to be unrated or are simply too small to issue debt rated by a nationally recognized rating agency in a cost-efficient manner.

The financing marketplace for STORE Properties is highly fragmented, with few participants addressing the long-term capital needs of middle-market and larger non-rated companies. While we believe our net-lease financing solutions can add value to a wide variety of companies, we believe the largest underserved market and, therefore, our greatest opportunity, is non-rated, bank-dependent, middle-market and larger companies that generally have less access to efficient sources of long-term capital.

4

Our customers typically have the choice either to own or to lease the real estate they use in their daily businesses. They choose to lease for various reasons, including the potential to lower their cost of capital, as leasing supplants traditional financing options that tie up the equity in their real estate. Leasing is also viewed as an attractive alternative to our customers because it generally locks in scheduled payments, at lower levels and for longer periods, than traditional financing options; these factors are viewed favorably relative to the amounts funded.

Whether companies elect toBecause STORE Properties are profit-center locations, payment of rent or ownunder our lease contracts is supported not only by the credit quality of the tenant and the residual value of the real estate, they use in their businesses is most often a financial decision. For the few highly capitalized large companies that possess investment-grade credit ratings, real estate leasing tends to be viewed as a substitute for corporate borrowings that they could otherwise access (so long as they remain highly ratedbut also and equitized). With real estate leases often bearing rental costs that exceed corporate term borrowing costs, such companies elect to rent for strategic reasons. Such reasons may include the long-term flexibility to vacate properties that are no longer strategic, the permanence of lease capital which lessens potential refinancing risk should corporate credit ratings deteriorate, the lack of corporate financial covenants associated with leasing and the ability to harness developers to effectively outsource their real estate development needs. The primary motivations for S|T|O|R|E’s middle-market and larger customers tend to be different. For such companies, real estate leasing solutions offer the potential to lower their cost of capital. In addition to this primary economic motivation, our tenants also seek lease assignability, property substitution rights, property closure rights and S|T|O|R|E’s assistance with property expansion and lease contract modification. Our real estate leasing solutions offer tenants such flexibility, which, in turn, offers the potential for further tenant wealth creation. We believe that our customers select us as their landlord of choice principally as a result of our service, comparative business flexibility and the tailored net-lease solutions we provide.

We believe the demand for our net-lease solutions has grown, in part, as a result of the current bank regulatory environment. In our view, the increased scrutiny and regulation of the banking industry in response to the collapse of the housing and mortgage industries from 2007 to 2009, particularly the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, and the Basel Accords issuedprimarily by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, have constrained real estate lending practices and limited desirable term debt real estate borrowing options. Real estate leasing today represents a highly desirable component of corporate capitalization strategies due, in part, to the unavailability of long-term, fixed rate commercial real estate mortgage financing with important features such as affordable prepayment and modification options or loan assignability.

S|T|O|R|E was formed to capitalize on a large market opportunity resulting from the widespread need amongst middle-market and larger companies for efficient corporate real estate capital solutions. We believe our opportunities include both gaining market share from the fragmented network of net-lease capital providers and growing the market by creating demand for our net-lease solutions that meet the long-term real estate capital needs of these companies.

The estimated $3.9 trillion market of STORE Properties is divided into three primary industry sectors and various industry sub-sectors. The primary sectors and their proportion of this market are service at 47%, retail at 42% and manufacturing at 11%. The sub-sectors included within each primary sector are summarized in the table below.

​

5

Within the sub-sectors, the market for STORE Properties is further subdivided into a wide variety of industries within the service, retail and manufacturing sectors, such as:

​

Although many of these industries are represented within our diverse property portfolio, S|T|O|R|E primarily targets service sector properties that represent a broad array of everyday services (such as restaurants and early childhood education facilities) that are not readily available online and that are located near customers targetedprofits produced by the business operating onoperations at the property. Although not our primary focus, the retail sector assetslocations we target are primarily located in retail corridors, also tend to be internet resistant and include a high experiential component, such as furniture and hunting and fishing stores. In the manufacturing sector, we typically target properties that represent a broad array of industries, are located in industrial parks near customers and suppliers, and are operated by businesses that produce everyday necessities. As of December 31, 2021, our portfolio of investments in STORE Properties was diversified across approximately 120 industries, of which 65% was in the service sector, 15% was in the retail sector and 20% was in the manufacturing sector, based on revenue.own (e.g. unit-level profitability).

Our Asset Class: STORE Properties

STORE Properties are a unique asset class that inspired the formation of S|T|O|R|E and our company name. STORE (Single Tenant Operational Real Estate) Properties are profit-center real estate locations on which our customers conduct their businesses and generate revenues and profits. The defining characteristic of STORE Properties is the number of sources that support the payment of our rent: STORE Properties have the following three sources, whereas all other commercial real estate assets have just two.

6

Creating Investment-GradeSuperior Lease Contracts

From our inception in 2011, we have emphasized and uniquely disclosed information regarding the net-lease contracts we create with our tenants. We believe that our net-lease contracts, and not simply tenant or real estate quality, are central to our potential to deliver superior long-term risk-adjusted rates of return to our stockholders.return. Contract quality embodies tenant and real estate characteristics, together with other investment attributes we believe are highly material. Contract attributes include the prices we pay for the real estate we own, inclusive of the prices relative to new construction cost. As of December 31, 2021, our average investment approximated 80% of replacement cost, a statistic that has been relatively stable since 2015. Other important contract attributes include the ability to receive unit-level financial statements, which allows us to evaluate unit-level cash flows relative to the rents we receive. As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average ability of the properties we own to cover our rents, which we refer to as the “4-wall coverage ratio,” approximated 4.6:1 (the median 4-wall coverage ratio approximated 3.1:1). In addition, we calculate a coverage ratio, inclusive of an allowance for indirect costs, for each of the properties we own which we refer to as the “unit fixed charge coverage ratio.” As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average unit fixed charge coverage ratio approximated 3.6:1 (the median unit fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.5:1). Likewise, over many years of providing real estate net-lease capital, we have determined that tenant alignments of interest are highly important. Such alignments of interest can include full parent company recourse, credit enhancements in the form of guarantees, cross default provisions and the use of master leases. Master leases, which comprise most of our multi-property net-lease contracts, are individual lease contracts that bind multiple properties and offer landlords greater security in the event of tenant insolvency and bankruptcy. Whereas individual property leases provide tenants with the opportunity to evaluate the desirability and viability of each individual property they rent in the event of a bankruptcy, master leases bind multiple properties, permitting landlords to benefit from aggregate property performance and limiting tenants’ ability to pick and choose which leases to retain. As of December 31, 2021, 94% of our multi-property net-lease contracts were in the form of master leases. Contract economic terms are also highly important because they can enhance margins of safety. During 2021, our weighted average initial lease rate was 7.5%, with annual contractual lease escalations averaging an added 1.9% of contract rents for new assets added during the year. We believe that our initial yields, on average, range from 10% to 15% above those expected by investors seeking real estate investment opportunities through the broker auction market, which provides us greater flexibility to preserve and enhance returns. Other important tenant contract considerations include contractual lease escalations, indemnification provisions, lease renewal rights, and the ability to sublease and assign leases, as well as qualitative considerations, such as alternative real estate use assessment and the composition of a tenant’s capitalization structure.

Since our November 2014 initial public offering, S|T|O|R|E’s extensive contract attribute disclosure has uniquely included a tenant credit quality distribution chart, employing computed implied credit ratings applied to regularly received tenant financial statements using Moody’s Analytics RiskCalc. Since tenant credit ratings are merely one component of contract risk, we developed a means to deliver a base quantitative contract quality estimate. Our approach was to modify risk of tenant insolvency, as estimated by the Moody’s algorithm, by our own estimate of the likelihood of property closure, based on the regularly monitored profitability of the properties bound by each lease contract we create. To accomplish this, we established a simple range of property closure likelihood ranging from 10% to 100% based upon property profitability ranges from breakeven to a computed ability to cover our rents twice over. Multiplying tenant estimated insolvency probability (Moody’s Analytics RiskCalc) by our estimate of the probability of property closure results in a contract risk measurement that we call the STORE Score and which we regularly and uniquely disclose.

Our Business and Growth Strategies

Our objective is to continue to create stockholder value through sustained investment and management activities designed to increase distributable cash flows and deliver attractive risk-adjusted rates of return from a growing, diverse portfolio of STORE Properties. To accomplish this, our principal business and growth strategies are as follows:

9

Beyond our regular engagement with our customers on business matters, in 2019, we initiated a tenant outreach program designed to gauge our tenants’ current sustainability practices, provide them with sustainability education and support resources, and encourage them to engage in sustainable practices, including reducing power usage, saving water, assessing building equipment, and implementing other energy-efficiency upgrades. We believe that effective encouragement of sustainability initiatives, particularly related to energy, water and indoor environmental quality, can lead to the adoption of practices that can drive business and real estate value appreciation, decrease operating costs and mitigate regulatory risks.  

Environmental Stewardship

We are committed to environmental sustainability and the mitigation of environmental risks in connection with the development of our property portfolio. This commitment reflects the fact that the properties we acquire are subject to both state and federal environmental regulations, but, more importantly, it aligns with our belief that being conscious of, and seeking to address and manage, environmental risks within our control, and supporting our customers to do the same in

10

their businesses, plays a role in building and sustaining successful enterprises; and, thus, is material to the success of our own business.

Our environmental initiatives and partnerships focus on energy savings and carbon footprint reduction in our customers’ facilities. As we are a triple-net lease REIT, without direct control of physical locations, our primary strategy includes educating ourselves and our customers on evolving environmental strategies, soliciting feedback, and gathering environmental data from our customers. This includes developing relationships between our customers and ESGenvironmental, social and governance (“ESG”) vendor partners, and supporting our tenants in the implementation of green programs including energy efficiency and carbon reduction programs.

As part of our attentiveness to environmental concerns, we:

Acquisition Process. Our commitment to environmental sustainability begins before we acquire a real estate asset and involves, among other factors, a consideration of the environmental risk associated with our tenants and with prior users of the real estate asset. We then analyze environmental matters in each step of our three-phase property acquisition process:

We may take additional actions in situations where a target property may be subject to risks associated with climate change, particularly as a result of being located in a geographic area susceptible to floods, hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes or other climate-related occurrences. These additional steps and actions may include: (i) maintaining comprehensive environmental insurance coverage for specified properties in our portfolio to ensure that there are financial resources available to conduct safe and timely remediation in the event of an unforeseen environmental issue; and (ii) preparing for climate-related natural disasters by requiring our tenants to carry insurance, including fire, wind/hail, earthquake, flood and other extended coverage where appropriate given the relative risk of loss, geographic location and industry best practices.

Building Sustainable Tenant Relationships. Despite owning our properties subject to triple-net leases, under which our tenants control all business operations at the properties, we strive to positively influence the sustainability practices of our tenants. We expect that such efforts will foster relationships with our tenants that effectively encourage sustainability initiatives, particularly related to energy, water and indoor environmental quality, which can lead to the adoption of

11

practices that should drive business and real estate value appreciation, decrease operating costs and mitigate regulatory risks.

Our primary strategy includes educating ourselves and our customers on evolving environmental strategies, soliciting feedback, and gathering environmental data from our customers. This includes developing relationships between our customers and ESG vendor partners, and supporting our tenants in the implementation of green programs including energy efficiency and carbon reduction programs. To advance this effort, we:

We supplement our annual property inspections with an annual tenant outreach survey from which we collect further data on sustainability features implemented by our participating tenants at their leased properties and assess our customers’ corporate responsibility priorities, progress and interest in partnering on projects. The data collected from our survey allows us to provide our tenants with education, ideas and support for property-level sustainability solutions, and provides us with a forum to encourage them to pursue sustainable practices and explore technological solutions. This survey has allowed us to engage directly with our tenants most interested in reducing their carbon footprint and related environmental impact and focus our discussions and consultant introductions to those that that best meet the needs and interests of those tenants.

In addition to the survey, we work with ESG vendors and consultants to identify real estate in our portfolio that meets requirements for select initiatives such as solar and electric car chargers. We then proactively reach out to targeted tenants to educate them about the benefits of the select initiative and to assess their interest in learning more and meeting with a consultant for a review of their options. We believe that ongoing tenant engagement and collaboration on environmentally focused property initiatives should create a long-term culture of sustainable tenant relationships.

Human Capital Management

We believe that to continue to deliverdelivering strong financial results, we must execute on a human capital strategy that prioritizes, among other things: (i) establishing a work environment that: attracts, develops, and retains top talent; (ii) affording our employees an engaging work experience that allows for career development and opportunities for meaningful civic involvement; (iii) evaluating compensation and benefits, and rewarding outstanding performance; (iv) engaging with, and obtaining feedback from, our employees on their workplace experiences; (v) enabling every employee at every level to be treated with dignity and respect, to be free from discrimination and harassment, and to devote their full attention and best efforts to performing their job to the best of their respective abilities; and (vi) communicating with our board of directors on key topics.

As part of our efforts to achieve these priorities:

and regulations and remediate or take other corrective action should any environmental issues arise. We believe the costs of capital expenditures related to environmental liabilities will not have a material impact on the results of our operations, as such costs are typically borne by the sellers, previous owners, and tenants of our properties.

About Us

We wereSTORE Capital Corporation was incorporated under the laws of Maryland on May 17, 2011. Since our initial public offering in November 2014, shares of our common stock have tradedSTORE Capital LLC was formed under the ticker symbol “STOR”laws of Delaware on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE.August 30, 2022. Our offices are located at 8377 E. Hartford Drive, Suite 100, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255. We currently lease approximately 27,80034,500 square feet of office space from an unaffiliated third party. Our telephone number is (480) 256-1100 and our website is www.storecapital.com.

Available Information

We electronically file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, our annual reports on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. You may obtain a free copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, on the day of filing with the SEC on our website, or by sending an email message to info@storecapital.com.

Actual or perceived threats associated with the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health crises could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our customers’ businesses.

There is substantial uncertainty with respect to the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and how it will impact real estate, businesses and global markets in the years to come. The continued spread of COVID-19 may impact states where our properties are located, and preventative measures that may be taken in response to current and future outbreaks of COVID-19, or other public health crises, including “shelter-in-place” or “stay-at-home” orders issued by local, state or federal authorities, may have a material adverse effect on our and our customers’ businesses, results of operations, liquidity and ability to access capital markets, and may affect our ability as a net-lease REIT to acquire properties or lease properties to our customers, who may be unable, as a result of economic downturns occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health crises, to make rental payments when due.

Contingent rent escalators may expose us to inflation risk and can hinder our growth and profitability.

A substantial portion of our leases contain variable-rate contingent rent escalators that periodically increase the base rent payable by the customer. Our leases with rent escalators indexed to future increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) primarily adjust over a one-year period but may adjust over multiple-year periods. Generally, these escalators increase rent at the lesser of (i) 1 to 1.25 times the change in the CPI over a specified period or (ii) a fixed percentage. Under this formula,As a result of these escalators, during periods of deflation or low inflation, small increases or decreases in the CPI may cause us to receive lower rental revenues than we would receive under leases with fixed-rate rent escalators. Conversely, when inflation is higher, contingent rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation. Higher inflation may also have an adverse impact on our customers if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in revenue, which may adversely affect our customers’ ability to satisfy their financial obligations to us.

The success of our business depends upon the success of our customers’ businesses, and bankruptcy laws will limit our remedies in the event of customer defaults.

We lease substantially all of our properties to customers who operate businesses at the leased properties. We underwrite and evaluate investment risk on the basis that the profitability of these businesses is the primary source that supports the payments on our leases and loans, which we refer to as “unit-level profitability.” We believe the success of our investments materially depends upon whether our customers generate unit level profitability at the locations we acquire and lease back or finance. Economic conditions are cyclical, and developments that discourage consumer spending or cause a downturn in the national economy, or the regional and local economies where our properties are located, could impair our customers’ ability to meet their lease obligations, resulting in customer defaults or non-renewals under their leases, and reduce demand for our net-lease solutions, forcing us to offer concessions or reduced rental rates when re-leasing these properties.

If any of our customers struggle financially, they may decline to extend or renew their leases, miss rental payments or declare bankruptcy. Claims for unpaid future rent are rarely paid in full and are subject to statutory limitations that would likely cause us to receive rental revenues substantially below the contractually specified rent. We are often

There can be no assurance that our customers’ businesses will remain competitive with e-commerce providers in the future; any failure to do so would impair their ability to meet their lease obligations to us and materially and adversely affect us.

Geographic, market sector or industry concentrations within our portfolio may negatively affect our financial results.

Our operating performance is impacted by the economic conditions affecting the specific locales, market sectors and industries in which we have concentrations of properties. Our target market is middle-market companies that operate their businesses out of one or more locations that generate unit level profitability for the business, and as of December 31, 2021, we derived the largest amount of our base rent and interest from the following five states: Texas (11.3%), Illinois (6.3%), California (5.9%), Georgia (5.5%) and Florida (5.3%). As a result of these concentrations, local economic, market sector, and industry conditions, changes in state or local governmental rules and regulations, acts of nature, epidemics, pandemics and public health crises and actions taken in response thereto, and other factors affecting those states, market sectors or industries could result in an adverse effect on our customers’ businesses and their ability to meet their obligations to us. Additionally, a failure to increase demand for our products by, among other ways, failing to convince middle-market and larger companies to sell and lease back their properties, or an increase in the availability of properties for rent, could materially and adversely affect us. In particular, as of December 31, 2021, properties representing 12.0% of the dollar amount of our investment portfolio were dedicated to, and also 12.0% of our base rent and interest was derived from, customers operating in the restaurant industry. As we continue to acquire properties, our portfolio may become more concentrated by customer, industry or geographic area. A less diverse portfolio could cause us to be more sensitive to the bankruptcy of fewer customers, changes in consumer trends of a particular industry and a general economic downturn in a particular geographic area.

Failure of our underwriting and risk management procedures to accurately evaluate a potential customer’s credit risk could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial position.

Our success depends in part on the creditworthiness of our middle-market and larger customers who generally are not rated by any nationally recognized rating agency. We analyze creditworthiness using Moody’s Analytics RiskCalc, our methodology of estimating probability of lease rejection and the STORE Score,our proprietary ‘Probability of Default’ model, each of which may fail to adequately assess a particular customer’s default risk. An expected default frequency (“EDF”) score from Moody’s Analytics RiskCalc lacks the extensive company participation required to obtain a credit rating published by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization such as Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global, Inc. (“S&P”), and may not be as indicative of creditworthiness. Substantially all of our customers are required to provide corporate-level financial information to us periodically or at our request. EDF scores and the financial ratios we calculate are based on unverified financial information from our customers, may reflect only a limited operating history and include various estimates and judgments made by the party preparing the financial information. The probability of lease rejection we assign to a particular investment may be inaccurate and may not incorporate significant risks of which we are unaware, which may cause us to invest in properties and lease them to customers who ultimately default, and we may be unable to recover our investment by re-leasing or selling the related property, on favorable terms, or at all.

We may be unable to identify and complete acquisitions of suitable properties, which may impede our growth.

Our ability to continue to acquire properties we believe to be suitable and compatible with our growth strategy may be constrained by numerous factors, including the following:

We typically acquire only a small percentage (approximately 10%) of all properties that we evaluate (which we refer to as our “pipeline”). To the extent any of the foregoing decreases our pipeline or otherwise impacts our ability to continue to acquire suitable properties, our ability to grow our business will be adversely affected.

We face significant competition for customers, which may negatively impact the occupancy and rental rates of our properties, reduce the number of acquisitions we are able to complete or increase the cost of these acquisitions.

We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of properties that often own similar properties in similar markets, and if our competitors offer lower rents than we are offering, we may be pressured to lower our rents or to offer more substantial rent abatements, customer improvements, early termination rights, below-market renewal options or other lease incentive payments in order to remain competitive. Competition for customers could negatively impact the occupancy and rental rates of ourSTORE properties.

We also face competition for acquisitions of real property from investors, including traded and non-traded public REITs, private equity investors and other institutional investment funds, as well as private wealth management advisory firms, some of which have greater financial resources, a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire properties, the ability to offer more attractive terms to prospective customers and the willingness to accept greater risk or lower returns than we can prudently manage. This competition may increase the demand for STORE Properties and, therefore, reduce the number of, or increase the price for, suitable acquisition opportunities, all of which could materially and adversely affect us.

As leases expire, we may be unable to renew those leases or re-lease the space on favorable terms or at all.

As of December 31, 2021, leases and loans representing approximately 23.3% of our base rent and interest will expire prior to 2032. We may not be able to renew leases or re-lease spaces without interruptions in rental revenue, at or above our current rental rates or without offering substantial rent abatements, customer improvement allowances, early termination rights or below market renewal options, and the terms of renewal, extension or re-lease may be less favorable to us than the prior lease. Because some of our properties are specifically designed for a particular customer’s business, we may be required to renovate the property, decrease the rent we charge or provide other concessions in order to lease the property to another prospective customer. If we need to sell such properties, we may have difficulty selling them to a third party due to the property’s unique design.

Some of our customers operate under franchise or license agreements, which, if terminated or not renewed prior to the expiration of their leases with us, would likely impair their ability to pay us rent.

ManySome of our customers operate their businesses under franchise or license agreements, which generally have terms that end earlier than the respective expiration dates of the related leases. In addition, a customer’s rights as a franchisee or licensee typically may be terminated by the franchisor and the customer may be precluded from competing with the franchisor or licensor upon termination. A franchisor’s or licensor’s termination or refusal to renew a franchise or license agreement would impact the customer’s ability to make payments under its lease or loan with us. We typically have no notice or cure rights with respect to such a termination and have no rights to assignment of any such agreement, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to mitigate losses arising from a default by a terminated franchisee on any of our leases or loans.

than evicting the customer, we might encounter delays and expenses in obtaining possession of the improvements, which in turn could delay our ability to promptly sell or re-lease the property.

Defaults by customers on mortgages we hold could lead to losses on our investments.

From time to time, we make or assume commercial mortgage loans. We have also made a limited number of investments on properties we own or finance in the form of loans secured by equipment or other fixtures owned by our customers. In the event of a default, we would not earn interest or receive a return of the principal of our loan and may also experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as lender. Foreclosure and other similar proceedings used to enforce payment of real estate loans are generally subject to principles of equity, which are designed to relieve the indebted party from the legal effect of that party’s default. Foreclosure and other similar laws may limit our right to obtain a deficiency judgment against the defaulting party after a foreclosure or sale, and may lead to a loss or delay in the payment on loans we hold. If we do have to foreclose on a property, we may receive less in the foreclosure sale than the amount the customer owes us or that is needed to cover the costs to foreclose, repossess and sell the property.

Some of our customers rely on government funding, and their failure to continue to qualify for such funding could adversely impact their ability to make timely lease payments to us.

Some of our customers operate businesses that depend on government funding or reimbursements, such as customers in the education, healthcare and childcare related industries, which may require them to satisfy certain licensure or certification requirements in order to qualify for these government payments. The amount and timing of these government payments depend on various factors that often are beyond our or our customers’ control. We will likely continue to invest in properties leased by customers operating in these industries and acquire other businesses in industries that rely significantly on government payments. If these customers fail to receive necessary government funding or fail to comply with related regulations, their cash flow could be materially affected, which may cause them to default on their leases and adversely impact our business.

Construction and renovation risks could adversely affect our profitability.

In certain instances, we provide financing to our customers for the construction and/or renovation of their properties. We are therefore subject to the risks that this construction or renovation may not be completed. Construction and renovation costs for a property may exceed a customer’s original estimates due to increased costs of materials or labor, or other unexpected costs. A customer may also be unable to complete construction or renovation of a property on schedule, which could result in increased debt service expenses or construction costs. These additional expenses may affect the ability of the customer to make payments to us.

Our ability to fully control the maintenance of our net-leased properties may be limited.

Because our customers are the tenants of our net-leased properties and are responsible for the day-to-day maintenance and management of our properties, after lease expiration, we may incur expenses for deferred maintenance or other liabilities if a property is not adequately maintained. We visit our properties periodically, but these visits are not comprehensive inspections and deferred maintenance items may go unnoticed. Our leases generally provide for recourse against a customer in these instances, but bankrupt or financially troubled customers may be more likely to defer maintenance, and it may be more difficult to enforce remedies against such customers. We may not always be able to ascertain the financial circumstances of a given customer or forestall deterioration in the condition of a property.

In addition, in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are generally required under the Code to, among other things, distribute annually at least 90% of our net REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, and we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gain. Because of these distribution requirements, without access to third-party sources of capital, we may not be able to acquire properties when strategic opportunities exist, meet the capital and operating needs of our existing properties, satisfy our debt service obligations or make the cash distributions to our stockholdersmembers necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Current market conditions, including increases in interest rates, could adversely affect our ability to refinance existing indebtedness or obtain additional financing for growth on acceptable terms or at all.

In periods during which credit markets experience significant price volatility, displacement and liquidity disruptions, liquidity in the financial markets can be impacted, making financing terms for customers less attractive, and in certain cases, rendering certain types of debt financing unavailable. In such periods, we may be unable to obtain debt financing on favorable terms, or at all, or fully refinance maturing indebtedness with new indebtedness. Furthermore, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to that refinanced indebtedness would increase, and the increased interest rates could cause our interest costs and overall costs of capital to increase.

Our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected if we or our subsidiaries are unable to make required payments on our debt.

Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness that we may incur, and weWe are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flows will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. If we are unable to make debt service payments as required on loans secured by properties we own, a lender could foreclose on the property or properties securing its debt. This could cause us to lose part or all of our investment. In addition, a significant portion of our investment portfolio consists of assets owned by our consolidated, bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity subsidiaries (“SPEs”) that have been pledged to secure the long-term borrowings of those SPEs. We or our other consolidated subsidiaries are the equity owners of our SPEs, which entitles us to the excess cash flows after debt service and all other required payments are made on the debt of our SPEs. If our SPEs fail to make the required payments on such indebtedness or fail to maintain the required debt service coverage ratios, distributions of excess cash flows to us may be reduced or suspended and the indebtedness may become immediately due and payable. If our SPEs are unable to pay the accelerated indebtedness, the pledged assets could be foreclosed upon and distributions of excess cash flows to us may be suspended or terminated, which could reduce the value of our portfolio and revenues available for distribution to our stockholders.members.

our SPEs, which issue multiple series of investment grade ABS notes from time to time as additional collateral is added to the collateral pool. Our CMBS debt is generally first mortgage debt incurred by other SPEs. Our ABS and CMBS debt is generally non-recourse, but there are customary limited exceptions to recourse for matters such as fraud, misrepresentation, gross negligence or willful misconduct, misapplication of payments, bankruptcy and environmental liabilities.

We have generally used the proceeds from these ABS and CMBS financings to repay debt and fund real estate acquisitions. Our obligations under these loans are generally secured by liens on certain of our properties. In the case of our STORE Master Funding program, subject to certain conditions and limitations, we may substitute real estate collateral for assets in the collateral pool from time to time. No assurance can be given that the ABS or the CMBS marketsmarket or financing facilities with similar flexibility to substitute collateral will be available to us in the future.

A disruption in the financial markets for ABS or CMBS debt may affect our ability to obtain long-term debt, which, in turn, may force us to acquire real estate assets at a lower than anticipated growth rate and negatively affect our return on equity. Furthermore, a reduction in the difference, or spread, between the rate we earn on our assets (primarily the lease rates we charge our customers) and the rate we pay on our liabilities (primarily the interest rates on our debt) could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition.

A downgrade in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The credit ratings assigned to us and our debt, which are subject to ongoing evaluation by the rating agencies who have published them, could change based upon, among other things, our historical and projected business, prospects, liquidity, results of operations and financial condition, or the real estate industry generally. If any credit rating agency downgrades or lowers our credit rating, places any such rating on a so-called “watch list” for a possible downgrading or lowering or otherwise indicates a negative outlook for that rating, it could materially adversely affect the market price of our debt securities, and our common stock, as well as our costs and availability of capital.

The agreements governing some of our indebtedness contain restrictions and covenants which may limit our ability to enter into or obtain funding for certain transactions, operate our business or make distributions to our common stockholders.members.

The agreements governing some of our indebtedness contain restrictions and covenants, including financial covenants, that limit or will limit our ability to operate our business. These covenants, as well as any additional covenants to which we may be subject in the future because of additional indebtedness, could cause us to forego investment opportunities, reduce or eliminate distributions to our common stockholdersmembers or obtain financing on less than favorable terms. The covenants and other restrictions under our debt agreements may affect our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens on assets, sell or substitute assets, modify certain terms of our leases, prepay debt with higher interest rates, manage our cash flows and make distributions to our common stockholders.members. Additionally, these restrictions may adversely affect our operating and financial flexibility and may limit our ability to respond to changes in our business or competitive environment, all of which may materially and adversely affect us.

the performance of our property portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service our debt and pay dividendsmake distributions to our stockholders.members.

The loss of a customer, either through lease expiration or customer bankruptcy, may require us to spend significant amounts of capital to renovate the property before it is suitable for a new customer and cause us to incur significant costs in the form of ongoing expenses for property maintenance, taxes, insurance and other expenses.

Uninsured losses relating to real property may adversely affect our returns.

Our contracts generally require our customers to maintain insurance customary for similar types of commercial property. Depending on the location of the property or nature of its use, losses of a catastrophic nature may be covered by insurance policies held by our customers with limitations, such as large deductibles or copayments, that a customer may not be able to meet. In addition, factors such as inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, public safety threats and others may result in insurance proceeds that are insufficient to repair or replace a damaged or destroyed property. In the event of a substantial or comprehensive loss of any of our properties, we may not be able to rebuild such property to its existing specifications without significant capital expenditures, which may exceed any amounts received under insurance policies, due to the upgrades needed to meet zoning and building code requirements. The loss of our capital investment in, or anticipated future returns from, our properties due to material uninsured losses could materially and adversely affect us.

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire, safety and other regulations may require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that could materially and adversely affect us.

Our properties are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), which requires public accommodations to meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with the ADA, or future legislation, could require us to modify the properties we own or may purchase to remove architectural and communication barriers and may restrict renovations on our properties. Failure to comply with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants, as well as costs to make modifications to attain compliance. Our customers are generally required to maintain and repair our properties in compliance with the ADA and other similar laws and regulations, but we could be held liable as the owner of the property in the event of a customer’s non-compliance. Any required modifications could involve greater expenditures than anticipated or the modifications might be made on a more accelerated basis than anticipated, either of which could adversely affect the ability of our customers to cover such costs.

Our properties are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to fire, safety and other regulations, and in some instances, common area obligations. Our customers have primary responsibility for compliance with these regulations but may not have the financial ability to fully maintain compliance, which may cause them to be unable to pay rent on time or default. If this were to occur, we would be required to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with these regulations, which we may not be able to recoup from our customers. We may also face owner liability for failure to comply with these regulations, which may lead to the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.

Environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

Our properties may be subject to known and unknown environmental liabilities under various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to human health and the environment, some of which may impose joint and several liability on certain statutory classes of persons, including owners or operators, for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties. These laws and regulations apply to past and present business operations on the properties, and the use, storage, handling and recycling or disposal of hazardous substances or wastes. We may be liable regardless of our knowledge of the contamination, the timing of the contamination, the cause of the contamination or the party responsible for the contamination. Our customers generally must indemnify us from all or most environmental compliance costs, but if a customer fails to, or cannot, comply, we may be required to pay such costs. These costs could be substantial, and because these potential environmental liabilities are generally uncapped, these costs could significantly exceed the property’s value. There can be no assurance that our environmental due diligence efforts will reveal all environmental conditions at the properties in our pipeline.

21

Under the laws of many states, contamination on a site may give rise to a lien on the site for clean-up costs. Several states will grant priority to a “super lien” for clean-up costs over all existing liens, including those of existing mortgages. If any of the properties on which we have a mortgage are or become contaminated and subject to a super lien, we may not be able to recover the full value of our investment.

Certain federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the use, removal and/or replacement of underground storage tanks in the event of a release on, or an upgrade or redevelopment of, certain properties. Such laws,

certain statutory provisions, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which we first failed to qualify as a REIT. The additional tax liability from such a failure would reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for investment or distribution to our common stockholders, which would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities and our ability to raise additional capital, and we would no longer be required to make distributions to our common stockholders.

Potential tax law changes could affect our ability to qualify as a REIT and could adversely affect our stockholders.

U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and other corporations and the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended at any time, potentially with retroactive effect. The federal government may enact significant reform of the Code, including significant changes to taxation of business entities, tax deferred exchanges and the deductibility of interest expense. There is a substantial lack of clarity around the likelihood, timing and details of any such tax reform and the impact of any potential tax reform on us or an investment in our securities. Future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or adversely affect our stockholders.

Even if we qualify as a REIT for purposes of the Code, we may be subject to other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our common stockholders.

As a REIT, we are subject to annual distribution requirements, which limit the amount of cash we may retain for other business purposes, including amounts to fund our growth. We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our net REIT taxable income to our stockholders, excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed earnings to not be subject to corporate income tax. Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. If we have net income from the sale of foreclosure property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we must pay a tax on that income at the corporate income tax rate. Further, if we sell an asset, other than foreclosure property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, our gain would be subject to the 100% “prohibited transaction” tax unless such sale were made by our wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary, or if we qualify for a safe harbor from such tax. We do not intend to engage in prohibited transactions. We cannot assure you, however, that we will only make sales that satisfy the requirements of the safe harbors or that the IRS will not successfully assert that one or more of such sales are prohibited transactions, as this determination is generally a question of the facts and circumstances regarding a particular transaction, and we have not sought, and do not intend to seek, a ruling from the IRS regarding any such dispositions.

We intend to make distributions to our common stockholders to comply with the requirements of the Code. However, differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets or borrow funds on a short-term or long-term basis in order to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code when the prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings.

Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.

In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends that constitute “qualified dividend income” paid to individuals, trusts and estates is 20%. Unlike dividends received from non-REIT corporations, our distributions are generally not eligible for reduced federal income tax rates, unless they are attributable to dividends received by the REIT from other corporations otherwise eligible for the reduced rate. Beginning in 2018 and for taxable years prior to 2026, non-corporate stockholders may generally deduct up to 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations, which would reduce the maximum marginal effective tax rate for individuals on the receipt of such ordinary dividends to 29.6%. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, investors who are individuals, trusts or estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

23

Recharacterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

The IRS may take the position that certain sale-leaseback transactions that we characterize as leases are not true leases for federal income tax purposes but are, instead, financing arrangements or loans. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the Code’s REIT asset tests, income tests or distribution requirements and consequently lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization unless we elect to make an additional distribution that subsequently enables us to maintain our REIT status. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be re-calculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the Code’s distribution requirements for a taxable year.

We could face possible state and local tax audits and adverse changes in state and local tax laws.

As a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but we are subject to certain state and local taxes, which change from time to time and may result in an increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which we own properties may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes in tax laws. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional state and local taxes. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and the amount of cash available for the payment of distributions to our common stockholders. In the ordinary course of business, our SPEs may also become subject to tax audits. If our SPEs become the subject of state or local tax audits, the ultimate result of such audits could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure

Our Board may change our investment or financing strategy, or leverage policies, without stockholder consent.

Our Board has the overall authority to oversee our operations and determine our major corporate policies. This authority includes significant flexibility. For example, our Board can, among other things: (i) change any of our strategies, policies or procedures with respect to property acquisitions and divestitures, including the creditworthiness standards with respect to our customers, subject to provisions in our charter; (ii) prevent the ownership, transfer and/or accumulation of shares in order to protect our status as a REIT or for any other reason deemed to be in the best interests of us and our stockholders; or (iii) determine that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. Any of these actions could increase our operating expenses, impact our ability to make distributions or reduce the value of our assets without the consent of our stockholders.

Our Board’s power to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of stock, classify and reclassify unissued stock and issue stock without stockholder approval may negatively impact our existing stockholders.

Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 375,000,000 shares of common stock and up to 125,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our charter authorizes our Board, without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we are authorized to issue, to authorize us to issue authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock into one or more classes or series of stock and to set the terms of such newly classified or reclassified shares. Accordingly, our Board could authorize the issuance of shares of capital stock that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us that our existing stockholders may view as favorable, with preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers or rights, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption that are senior to, or otherwise conflict with, the rights of our common stockholders. In addition, our Board may increase our authorized stock in order to issue additional shares in connection with future financings and other transactions. These additional issuances could dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders.

Limitations on share ownership and limitations on the ability of our stockholders to effect a change in control of us limit the transferability of our stock and may prevent takeovers that are beneficial to our stockholders.

To qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned by five or fewer individuals, including entities specified in the Code, during the last half of any taxable year, and this capital stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. To comply with these requirements, our charter contains stock ownership and

24

transfer restrictions such as, for example, a provision that generally limits ownership by any person of more than 9.8% (in value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock, unless our Board exempts the person from such ownership limitation, and transfers in violation of such limitation may be void. These restrictive provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control that does not threaten our REIT status, including those that involve a premium price for our stockholders or that might otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interests.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.

As permitted by Maryland law, our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to stockholders for monetary damages, except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services, or active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action adjudicated. As a result, we and our stockholders have limited rights against our directors and officers. Accordingly, if good faith actions taken by any of our directors or officers impede our performance, our ability and the ability of our stockholders to recover damages from such directors or officers will be limited. In addition, our charter authorizes us to obligate our company, and our bylaws require us, to indemnify our directors and officers for actions taken by them in those and certain other capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Changes in market conditions and volatility of stock prices could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our stock price experiences price and volume fluctuation, often without regard to our operating performance. As a result, investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our actual operating performance or prospects. A number of factors could negatively affect the price per share of our common stock, many of which are out of our control, including:

25

Increases in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on the value of our common stock if prospective purchasers of our common stock expect a higher dividend yield, and increased borrowing costs may decrease our funds available for distribution to our common stockholders.

The market price of our common stock will generally be influenced by the dividend yield on our common stock relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently relatively low, may lead prospective investors to expect a higher dividend yield. However, higher market interest rates would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease.

Future offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stock upon liquidation, or preferred equity securities, which may be senior to our common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In the future, we may issue debt or preferred equity securities. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock with a liquidation preference, and lenders with respect to other borrowings, will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or otherwise reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Our preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on distribution payments that could limit our ability to make distributions to holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk that future offerings may reduce the market price of our common stock and dilute their stock holdings in us.

A substantial portion of our total outstanding common stock may be sold into the market at any time, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well, and make it difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future.

The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of actual or anticipated sales of a large number of shares of our common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at times or prices that we deem appropriate. We filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register the offer and sale of up to 7,314,221 shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan and our 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, and recipients of those shares may generally freely resell them in the open market, subject to certain limitations governing our affiliates. In addition, as we continue to issue additional equity securities periodically to finance our growth, including through our “at the market” offering programs, these issuances will dilute the interests of our existing stockholders and could adversely affect the value of their investments. If our performance or prospects decline and we are unable to access the equity markets when needed in the future, our ability to grow our business will be adversely impacted.

We may change the dividend policy for our common stock in the future.

The decision to declare and pay dividends on our common stock, as well as the form, timing and amount of any such future dividends, is at our Board’s sole discretion and will depend on our earnings, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual prohibitions or other limitations governing our indebtedness, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, state law and other relevant factors. Any change in our dividend policy could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Other General Risks

We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems.

While we do not collect or maintain the types of information that are most often targeted in cyber-attacks, such as credit card data, bank account information, or sensitive personal information, we nevertheless face risks associated with

26

security breaches through cyber-attacks, malware, computer viruses and malicious codes, ransomware, unauthorized access attempts, denial of service attacks, phishing, social engineering, bad actors with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business, the availability and integrity of our data and our ability to perform day-to-day operations, and security breaches or system interruptions could result in misstated financial reports, violations of loan covenants, missed reporting deadlines, our inability to monitor our compliance with the rules and regulations regarding our qualification as a REIT, unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, the diversion of management attention and resources to remedy any resulting damages, liability for claims for

predict what governmental rules or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future rules or regulations will be administered or interpreted or how future rules or regulations will affect our or our customers’ businesses.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

​

Item 2. PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2021,2022, our total investment in real estate and loans approximated $10.7$12.0 billion, representing investments in 2,8663,084 property locations, substantially all of which are profit centers for our customers. These investments generate cash flows from approximately 775 contracts predominantly structured as net leases. The weighted average non-cancelable remaining term of our leases was approximately 13.413.1 years.

Our real estate portfolio is highly diversified. As of December 31, 2021, our 2,866 property locations were operated by 556 customers across the United States. Our customers are typically established regional and national operators, with approximately 50% of our base rent and interest coming from customers with over $200 million in annual revenues. Our largest customer represented approximately 3.0% of our portfolio at December 31, 2021, and our top ten largest customers represented 18.4% of base rent and interest. Our customers operate their businesses across approximately 855 brand names or business concepts in 120 industries.

The following tables summarize the diversification of our real estate portfolio based on the percentage of base rent and interest, annualized based on rates in effect on December 31, 2021, for all of our leases, loans and direct financing receivables in place as of that date.

​

Diversification by Customer

As of December 31, 2021, our property locations were operated by 556 customers and the following table identifies our ten largest customers:

​

Diversification by Industry

As of December 31, 2021 our customers’ business concepts were diversified across approximately 120 industries within the service, retail and manufacturing sectors of the U.S. economy. The following table summarizes those industries into 79 industry groups:

​

​

29

3014

32

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the “Business” section, as well as the consolidated financial statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this report,Annual Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategies for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should read “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and the “Forward-Looking Statements” sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements.

In 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2019-07, Codification Updates to SEC Sections-Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, which makes a number of changes meant to simplify certain disclosures in financial condition and results of operations, particularly by eliminating year-to-year comparisons between prior periods previously disclosed. In complying with the relevant aspects of the rule covering the current year annual report,Annual Report, we include disclosures on our cash flows and results of operations for fiscal year 20212022 versus 20202021 only. For discussion of our fiscal year 20202021 compared to our fiscal year 2019,2020, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2021.

​

somewhat in an inflationary economic environment.the lease contracts. As of December 31, 2021,2022, approximately 99% of our leases (based on base rent) were “triple-net” leases, which means that our customers are responsible for all the operating costs such as maintenance, insurance and property taxes associated with the properties they lease from us, including any increases in those costs that may occur as a result of inflation. The remaining leases have some landlord responsibilities, generally related to maintenance and structural component replacement that may be required on such properties in the future, although we do not currently anticipate incurring significant capital expenditures or property-level operating costs under such leases. Because our properties are single-tenant properties, almost all of which are under long-term leases, it is not necessary for us to perform any significant ongoing leasing activities on our properties. As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average remaining term of our leases (calculated based on base rent) was approximately 13.4 years, excluding renewal options, which are exercisable at the option of our tenants upon expiration of their base lease term. Leases approximating 99% of our base rent as of that date provide for tenant renewal options (generally two to four five-year options) and leases approximating 11% of our base rent provide our tenants the option, at their election, to purchase the property from us at a specified time or times (generally at the greater of the then fair market value or our cost, as defined in the lease contracts).

We have dedicated an internal team to review and analyze ongoing tenantcustomer financial performance, both at the corporate level and with respect to each property we own, in order to identify properties that may no longer be part of our long-term strategic plan. As part of that continuous active-management process,plan and as such, we may from time to time decide to sell properties where we believe the property no longer fits within our plan. Because generally we have been able to acquire assets and originate new leases at lease rates above the online commercial real estate auction marketplace, we have been able to sell these assets on both opportunistic and strategic bases, typically for a gain. This gain acts to partially offset any possible losses we may experience in the real estate portfolio.properties.

Our primary cash expenditures are the principal and interest payments we make on the debt we use to finance our real estate investment portfolio and the general and administrative expenses of managing the portfolio and operating our business. Since substantially all our leases are triple net, our tenants are generally responsible for the maintenance, insurance and property taxes associated with the properties they lease from us. When a property becomes vacant through a tenant default or expiration of the lease term with no tenant renewal, we incur the property costs not paid by the tenant, as well as those property costs accruing during the time it takes to locate a substitute tenant or sell the property. As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average remaining term of our leases was approximately 13.4 years and the contracts related to just 22 properties, representing 0.5% of our annual base rent and interest, are due to expire during 2022; 77% of our leases have ten years or more remaining in their base lease term. As of December 31, 2021, 15 of our 2,866 properties were vacant and not subject to a lease, which represents a 99.5% occupancy rate. We expect to incur some property-level operating costs from time to time in periods during which properties that become vacant are being remarketed. In addition, we may recognize an expense for certain property costs, such as real estate taxes billed in arrears, if we believe the tenant is likely to vacate the property before making payment on those obligations or may be unable to pay such costs in a timely manner. Property costs are generally not significant to our operations, but the amount of property costs can vary quarter to quarter based on the timing of property vacancies and the level of underperforming properties. We may advance certain property costs on behalf of our tenants but expect that the majority of these costs will be reimbursed by the tenant and do not anticipate that they will be significant to our operations.

We intend to continue to grow through additional real estate investments. To accomplish this objective, we must continue to identify real estate acquisitions that are consistent with our underwriting guidelines and raise future additional capital to make such acquisitions. We acquire real estate with a combination of debt and equity capital, proceeds from the sale of properties and cash from operations that is not otherwise distributed to our stockholdersmembers in the form of dividends. When we sell properties, we generally reinvest the cash proceeds from those sales in new property acquisitions.distributions. We also periodically commit to fund the construction of new properties for our customers or to provide them funds to improve and/or renovate properties we lease to them. These additional investments will generally result in increases to the rental revenue or interest income due under the related contracts. As of December 31, 2021, we had commitments to our customers to fund improvements to owned or mortgaged real estate properties totaling approximately $160.7 million, of which $143.5 million is expected to be funded in the next twelve months.

Financing Strategy

Our debt capital is initially provided on a short-term, temporary basis through a multi-year, variable-rate unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of banks. We manage our long-term leverage position through the strategic and economic issuance of long-term fixed-rate debt on both a secured and unsecured basis. By matching the expected cash inflows from our long-term real estate leases with the expected cash outflows of our long-term fixed-rate debt, we “lock in,”in”, for as long as is economically feasible, the expected positive difference between our scheduled cash inflows on the leases and the cash outflows on our debt payments. By locking in this difference, or spread, we seek to reduce the risk that increases in interest rates would adversely impact our profitability. In addition, we may use various financial instruments designed to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies such as interest rate swaps and caps, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. We also ladder our debt maturities in order to minimize the gap between our free cash flow (which we define as our cash from operations less dividendsdistributions plus proceeds from our sale of properties) and our annual debt maturities; we have no significant debt maturities until 2024.maturities.

As of December 31, 2021, all our long-term debt was fixed-rate debt and our weighted average debt maturity was 6.8 years. As part of our long-term debt strategy, we develop and maintain broad access to multiple debt sources. We believe that having access to multiple debt markets increases our financing flexibility because different debt markets may attract different kinds of investors, thus expanding our access to a larger pool of potential debt investors. Also, a particular debt market may be more competitive than another at any particular point in time.

The long-term debt we have issued to date is comprised of both secured non-recourse borrowings, the vast majority of which is investment-grade rated, and senior investment-grade unsecured borrowings. We are currently rated Baa2, BBB and BBB by Moody’s Investors Service, S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings, respectively. In October 2021, S&P Global Ratings raised its outlook on the Company to positive from stable and affirmed its BBB issuer credit rating. In conjunction with our investment-grade debt strategy, we target a level of debt net of cash and cash equivalents that

35

approximates 5½ to 6 times our estimated annualized amount of earnings (excluding gains or losses on sales of real estate and provisions for impairment) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (based on our current investment portfolio). Our leverage, expressed as the ratio of debt (net of cash and cash equivalents) to the cost of our investment portfolio, was approximately 40% at December 31, 2021.

Our secured non-recourse borrowings are obtained through multiple debt markets – primarily the asset-backed securities debt market. The vast majority of our secured non-recourse borrowings were made through an investment-grade-rated debt program we designed, which we call our Master Funding debt program. By design, this program provides flexibility not commonly found in most secured non-recourse debt and which is described in Non-recourse Secured Debt below. To a lesser extent, we may also obtain fixed-rate non-recourse mortgage financing through the commercial mortgage-backed securities debt market or from banks and insurance companies secured by specific properties we pledge as collateral.

Our goal is to employ a prudent blend of secured non-recourse debt through our flexible Master Funding debt program, paired with senior unsecured debt that uses our investment grade credit ratings. By balancing the mix of secured and unsecured debt, we can effectively leverage those properties subject to the secured debt in the range of 60%-70% and, at the same time, target a more conservative level of overall corporate leverage by maintaining a large pool of properties that are unencumbered. As of December 31, 2021, our secured non-recourse borrowings had a loan-to-cost ratio of approximately 63% and approximately 36% of our investment portfolio serves as collateral for this long-term debt. The remaining 64% of our portfolio properties, aggregating approximately $6.8 billion at December 31, 2021, are unencumbered and this unencumbered pool of properties provides us the flexibility to access long-term unsecured borrowings. The result is that our growing unencumbered pool of properties can provide higher levels of debt service coverage on the senior unsecured debt than would be the case if we employed only unsecured debt at our overall corporate leverage level. We believe this debt strategy can lead to a lower cost of capital for the Company, especially as we can issue AAA rated debt from our Master Funding debt program, as described further below.

The availability of debt to finance commercial real estate in the United States can, at times, be impacted by economic and other factors that are beyond our control. An example of adverse economic factors occurred during the recession of 2007 to 2009 when availability of debt capital for commercial real estate was significantly curtailed. We seek to reduce the risk that long-term debt capital may be unavailable to us by maintaining the flexibility to issue long-term debt in multiple debt capital markets, both secured and unsecured, and by limiting the period between the time we acquire our real estate and the time we finance our real estate with long-term debt. In addition, we have arranged our unsecured revolving credit facility to have a multi-year term with extension options in order to reduce the risk that short term real estate financing would not be available to us. As we continue to grow our real estate portfolio, we also intend to continue to manage our debt maturities to reduce the risk that a significant amount of our debt will mature in any single year in the future. Because our long-term secured debt generally requires monthly payments of principal, in addition to the monthly interest payments, the resulting principal amortization also reduces our refinancing risk upon maturity of the debt. As our outstanding debt matures, we may refinance the maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it using cash and cash equivalents or our unsecured revolving credit facility. For example, as part of our fourth issuance of senior unsecured public notes in November 2021, we prepaid, without penalty, $85.9 million of STORE Master Funding Series 2013-3 Class A-2 notes. Similar to this prepayment transaction, we may prepay other existing long-term debt in circumstances where we believe it would be economically advantageous to do so.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

Typically, we use our $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility to acquire our real estate properties, until those borrowings are sufficiently large to warrant the economic issuance of long-term fixed-rate debt, the proceeds from which we use to repay the amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2021,2022, we had $130.0$555.0 million outstanding under our previous unsecured revolving credit facility.

In June 2021, we recast this unsecured revolving credit facility to increase the accordion feature from $800 million to $1.0 billion, which now gives us a maximum borrowing capacity of $1.6 billion. The amended facility matures in June 2025 and includes two six-month extension options, subject to certain conditions. Borrowings under the previous facility requirerequired monthly payments of interest at a rate selected by us of either (1) LIBOR plus a credit spread ranging from 0.70% to 1.40%, or (2) the Base Rate, as defined in the credit agreement, plus a credit spread ranging from 0.00% to 0.40%. The credit spread used was based on our credit rating as defined in the credit agreement. We were also required to pay a facility fee on the total commitment amount ranging from 0.10% to 0.30%. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable credit spread for LIBOR-based borrowings was 0.85% and the facility fee was 0.20%.

time to time as additional collateral is added to the collateral pool and leverage can be added in incremental note issuances based on the value of the collateral pool.

To a lesser extent, we also may obtain debt in discrete transactions through other bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity subsidiaries, which debt is solely secured by specific real estate assets and is generally non-recourse to us (subject to certain customary limited exceptions). These discrete borrowings are generally in the form of traditional mortgage notes payable, with principal and interest payments due monthly and balloon payments due at their respective maturity dates, which typically range from seven to ten years from the date of issuance. Our secured borrowings contain various covenants customarily found in mortgage notes, including a limitation on the issuing entity’s ability to incur additional indebtedness on the underlying real estate. Certain of the notes also require the posting of cash reserves with the lender or trustee if specified coverage ratios are not maintained by the special purpose entity or the tenant.

The aggregate outstanding principal amount of our secured mortgage notes payable was $2.5$2.3 billion as of December 31, 20212022 and the scheduled maturities, including balloon payments, and scheduled interest payments on our aggregate secured mortgage notes payable are as follows (in thousands):