UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K10-K/A

(Amendment No.1)

(Mark One)

x

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022, 2022

or

or

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 001-37394

Black Knight, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

81-5265638

Delaware

81-5265638

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida

32204

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(904) 854-5100

(904) 854-5100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

BKI

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesx No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨No     No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yesx No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

x

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

¨

Emerging growth company

¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. x

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the shares of Black Knight, Inc. common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2022 was $9,847,744,920$9,847,744,920 based on the closing price of $65.39 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

As of February 24,March 13, 2023, there were 155,923,950156,799,838 shares of Black Knight, Inc. common stock outstanding.

The information in Part III hereof

Auditor NameKPMG LLP
Auditor Firm ID185
Auditor LocationJacksonville, FL

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) on Form 10-K/A is incorporated by referencebeing filed with respect to certain information from the registrant’s definitive proxy statementRegistrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders. The registrant intends to file the proxy statement within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year that isended December 31, 2022 filed with the subjectSecurities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2023 (the “Form 10-K”). This Amendment updates Part III in its entirety to contain the information required therein. As a result of this Report.

amendment, the Company is filing as exhibits to this Form 10-K/A the certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Because no financial statements are contained within this Form 10-K/A, the Company is not including certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Except for the changes to Part III and the filing of related certifications added to the list of Exhibits in Part IV, this Amendment makes no changes to the Form 10-K. This Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Form 10-K or modify disclosures affected by subsequent events. Terms used but not otherwise defined in the Amendment have such meaning as ascribed to them in the Form 10-K.

Except where otherwise noted, all references to “we,” “us,” “our”, the “Company” or “Black Knight” are to Black Knight, Inc. and its subsidiaries.


Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC.


FORM 10-K10-K/A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Page
Number

PART I

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

15

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

34

Item 2.

Properties

34

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

34

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

34

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

35

Item 6.

[Reserved]

36

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

36

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

49

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

51

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

96

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

96

Item 9B.

Other Information

97

Item 9C.

Disclosures Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

97

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Registrant

97

Item 11.10.

Executive CompensationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

97

4

Item 12.11.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder MattersEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

97

8

Item 13.12.

Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director IndependenceSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

97

48

Item 14.13.

Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

97

50

Item 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

53

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

98

Item 16.15.

Form 10-K SummaryEXHIBITS

102

54


PART III

Item 10.DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Certain Information about our Directors

iCertain biographical information for our directors is below.

Table

NamePosition with Black KnightAge
Anthony M. JabbourExecutive Chairman55
Catherine L. BurkeMember of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee47
Thomas M. Hagerty*

Lead Independent Director

Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

60
David K. Hunt

Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Member of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Risk Committee

77
Joseph M. OttingChairman of the Audit Committee65
Ganesh B. RaoMember of the Risk Committee46
John D. Rood

Chairman of the Risk Committee

Member of the Audit Committee

68
Nancy L. ShanikMember of the Audit Committee68

*As previously announced, Thomas M. Hagerty will retire at the end of Contentshis term at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Anthony M. Jabbour has served as our Executive Chairman since June 2021 and as a director since April 2018. Mr. Jabbour served as our Chief Executive Officer from April 2018 until May 2022. Mr. Jabbour has served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (DNB) since February 2019. He also serves on the board of Paysafe Ltd. Prior to joining Black Knight, Mr. Jabbour served as Corporate Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) from December 2015 through December 2017.

Mr. Jabbour served as Corporate Executive Vice President of the Integrated Financial Solutions segment of FIS from February 2015 until December 2015. He served as Executive Vice President of the North America Financial Institutions division of FIS from February 2011 to February 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Jabbour held positions of increasing responsibility in operations and delivery from the time he joined FIS in 2004. Prior to joining FIS, Mr. Jabbour worked for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and for IBM’s Global Services group managing complex client projects and relationships.

Mr. Jabbour’s qualifications to serve on the Black Knight board of directors include his extensive experience in leadership roles with financial services and technology companies, resulting in his deep knowledge of our business and industry, as well as his strong leadership abilities.

Catherine (Katie) L. Burke has served on the board of Black Knight since October 2020. Ms. Burke is global Vice Chairman and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer at DJE Holdings, a portfolio of companies and divisions that provide communications, marketing, public affairs, government affairs, data and analytics, and advisory services across a variety of sectors and geographies. Mrs. Burke first joined Edelman – a division of DJE Holdings – in 2008 and served in a variety of roles at the firm including President, Practices and Sectors, Global Chairman of Public Affairs and Global Chief of Staff. Between 2015 and 2018 Mrs. Burke served as Executive Vice President of Marketing and Communications at Nielsen Holdings, Inc. and founded and managed a communications firm, Katie Burke Communications, until she returned to Edelman in 2018. She also serves as a director of NCR Corporation.


Ms. Burke’s qualifications include her extensive experience and senior leadership roles in marketing, communications strategy and execution, and operations; her domestic and international experience in these areas; her financial literacy; and her independence.

Thomas M. Hagerty has served on the board of Black Knight and its predecessors since January 2014. Mr. Hagerty is a Managing Director of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (THL), which he joined in 1988. Mr. Hagerty currently serves as a director of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF), FleetCor Technologies, Ceridian HCM Holding, Inc. and DNB. Mr. Hagerty formerly served on the boards of First Bancorp, MoneyGram International, FIS and Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp.

Mr. Hagerty’s qualifications to serve on our board of directors include his managerial and strategic expertise working with large growth-oriented companies as a Managing Director of THL, a leading private equity firm, and his experience in enhancing value at such companies, along with his expertise in corporate finance and as a long-time director of public companies. He also has a strong background in the mortgage industry from serving as a long-time director of FNF and a deep knowledge of our business gained from serving on our board and the board of FIS.

David K. Hunt has served on the board of directors of Black Knight and its predecessors since April 2014. In addition, Mr. Hunt served as a director of FIS from June 2001 until May 2020 and served as a director of Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS) from February 2010 until January 2014, when LPS was acquired by FNF. Since December 2005, Mr. Hunt has been a private investor.

Mr. Hunt’s qualifications to serve on our board of directors include his long familiarity with our business and industry that he acquired as a director of LPS and FIS, as well as Mr. Hunt’s prior service as chairman of LPS’ risk and compliance committee and his deep understanding of the regulatory environment and other challenges facing our industry.

Joseph M. Otting has served on the board of Black Knight since June 2020. Mr. Otting is the former Comptroller of the Currency, a position for which he was nominated in June 2017, confirmed by the U.S. Senate and sworn in during November 2017, and in which Mr. Otting served until May 29, 2020. Mr. Otting also served as Acting Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees the government-sponsored enterprises Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, from January 2020 through April 2020. Mr. Otting served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of OneWest Bank, N.A. from October 2010 until August 2015, at which time OneWest Bank was merged with CIT Group. Mr. Otting served as President of CIT Bank and Co- President of CIT Group from August 2015 to December 2015. Prior to joining OneWest Bank, Mr. Otting served in various roles at U.S. Bank, a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp, including as one of eight Vice Chairmen and as the head of the Commercial Banking Group. Mr. Otting also serves as a director of Blockchain.com Inc.

Mr. Otting’s qualifications to serve on our board of directors include his strong understanding of the risks, regulatory environment, and other challenges facing our business and industry that he gained as Comptroller of the Currency, his understanding of our clients that he gained in various leadership roles with OneWest Bank, CIT Group and U.S. Bank, and his experience running a complex and highly regulated business organization.

Ganesh B. Rao has served on the board of Black Knight and its predecessors since January 2014. Mr. Rao is a Managing Director of THL, which he joined in 2000. Prior to joining THL, Mr. Rao worked at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated in the Mergers & Acquisitions Department. Mr. Rao also worked at Greenlight Capital, a hedge fund. Mr. Rao is currently a director of DNB and Ceridian HCM Holding, Inc. In his capacity as Managing Director of THL, Mr. Rao also serves on the boards of the following privately held companies: AbacusNext, AmeriLife Group, Auction.com, Carpe Data, Hexure, Hightower Advisors, Insurance Technologies Corporation, Nextech, Odessa and as a board observer of Guaranteed Rate. Mr. Rao is a former director of Comdata, MoneyGram International, Inc. and Nielsen Holdings N.V.

Mr. Rao’s qualifications to serve on our board of directors include his managerial and strategic expertise working with large growth-oriented companies as a Managing Director of THL, and his experience with enhancing value at such companies, along with his expertise in corporate finance.


Statement Regarding Forward-LookingJohn D. Rood has served on the board of Black Knight and its predecessors since January 2014. Mr. Rood is the founder and Chairman of The Vestcor Companies, a real estate firm with more than 30 years of experience in multifamily development and investment. Mr. Rood also serves on the boards of FNF and F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Rood served as the US Ambassador to the Commonwealth of the Bahamas. Mr. Rood previously served on the board of Alico, Inc., and currently serves on several private boards. In 1999, he was appointed by Governor Jeb Bush to serve on the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission where he served until 2004. He was appointed by Governor Charlie Crist to the Florida Board of Governors, which oversees the State of Florida University System, where he served until 2013. Mr. Rood was appointed by Mayor Lenny Curry to the JAXPORT Board of Directors, where he served from October 2015 to July 2016. Governor Rick Scott appointed Mr. Rood to the Florida Prepaid College Board in July 2016, where he serves as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Rood served on the Enterprise Florida and Space Coast Florida board of directors from September 2016 until February 2019.

Mr. Rood’s qualifications to serve on our board of directors include his experience in the real estate industry, his leadership experience as a United States Ambassador, his financial literacy and his experience as a director on boards of both public and private companies. Mr. Rood has participated in numerous risk and audit training programs with KPMG, Booz Allen and the National Association of Corporate Directors, or NACD. He is a Board Leadership Fellow with NACD.

Nancy L. Shanik is a private investor and has served on our board since December 2019. Ms. Shanik served as Chief Risk Officer of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. from November 2010 until April 2016, where she oversaw the risk management organization within Citizens. Prior to joining Citizens, Ms. Shanik served as a Managing Director of Alvarez & Marsal, a professional services firm focused on turnaround management, corporate restructuring and operational performance improvement, from 2009 to 2010. Prior to that, Ms. Shanik spent 31 years with Citigroup Inc. where she was both a Managing Director and Senior Credit Officer and served as the Chief Credit Officer of Citigroup Inc.’s Global Commercial Markets business. Ms. Shanik also serves on the board of directors of RBC US Group Holdings, which owns the U.S. operations of the Royal Bank of Canada. She also serves on the board of directors of City National Bank, which is a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Canada.

Ms. Shanik’s qualifications to serve on our board of directors include her strong background in the financial services industry and oversight of risk enterprise management for a complex and highly regulated business organization, resulting in her deep understanding of the risks, regulatory environment and other challenges facing our business and industry.

Certain Information about our Executive Officers

The statements containedexecutive officers of the Company are set forth in the table below, together with biographical information, except for our Executive Chairman Mr. Jabbour, whose biographical information is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or10-K/A under the section titled “Certain Information about our Directors.”

NamePosition with Black KnightAge
Anthony M. JabbourExecutive Chairman55
Joseph M. NackashiChief Executive Officer59
Kirk T. LarsenPresident and Chief Financial Officer51
Michael L. GravelleExecutive Vice President and General Counsel61

Joseph M. Nackashi has served as Chief Executive Officer since May 2022. He previously served as our President from July 2017 until May 2022. Mr. Nackashi served as President of our Servicing Software division from January 2014 until July 2017 and as our Chief Information Officer from January 2014 until June 2015. Mr. Nackashi previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of LPS from July 2008 until LPS was acquired by FNF in January 2014.

Kirk T. Larsen has served as our other documents or in oral presentations or other statements made byPresident since May 2022 and as our management that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements withinChief Financial Officer since January 2014. From January 2014 to April 2015, Mr. Larsen also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ServiceLink, LLC, a national provider of loan transaction services to the meaningmortgage industry. Prior to joining Black Knight, Mr. Larsen served as the Corporate Executive Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of Section 27AFIS from July 2013 until December 2013 and as Senior Vice President and Treasurer from October 2009 until July 2013.


Michael L. Gravelle has served as the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Black Knight and its predecessors since January 2014 and served as Corporate Secretary of Black Knight from January 2014 until May 2018. Mr. Gravelle has also served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of FNF since January 2010, and as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Cannae Holdings, Inc. (Cannae) since April 2017. Mr. Gravelle also served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Securities Actfollowing special purpose acquisition companies: Austerlitz Acquisition Corporation I (from December 2020 to January 2023), Austerlitz Acquisition Corporation II (from January 2021 to January 2023), Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. (from April 2020 to July 2021) and Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II (from July 2020 to March 2021).

Code of 1933,Ethics and Business Conduct

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer (who also serves as amended,our principal accounting officer) and Section 21Eour Corporate Controller, and a Code of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), including statements regardingBusiness Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all our expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These statements relate to, among other things, future financialdirectors, officers and operating results of Black Knight. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "could," "potential" or "continue," or the negativeemployees. The purpose of these termscodes is to: (i) promote honest and other comparable terminology. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these statements as a resultethical conduct, including the ethical handling of a numberconflicts of factors,interest; (ii) promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure; (iii) promote compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations; (iv) ensure the protection of our legitimate business interests, including but not limitedcorporate opportunities, assets and confidential information; and (v) deter wrongdoing. Our codes of ethics were adopted to reinvigorate and renew our commitment to our longstanding standards for ethical business practices. Our reputation for integrity is one of our most important assets and each of our employees and directors is expected to contribute to the following:

the occurrence of any event, change, or other circumstances that could give rise to a right in favor of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”) or us to terminate the definitive merger agreement governing the terms and conditions of the proposed acquisition by ICE of Black Knight (the “ICE Transaction”);
the possibility that the proposed ICE Transaction does not close when expected or at all because required regulatory or other approvals and other conditions to closing are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect ICE or us or the expected benefits of the proposed ICE Transaction);
business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the ICE Transaction is pending, which could adversely affect our business and operations;
the diversion of management’s attention and time from ongoing business operations and opportunities on merger-related matters;
the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against us or ICE;
changes to our relationships with our top clients, whom we rely on for a significant portion of our revenues and profit;
limitation of our growth due to the time and expense associated with switching from competitors’ software and services;
our ability to meet our contractual commitments and to offer high-quality technical support services;
our ability to comply with or changes in laws, rules and regulations that affect our and our clients’ businesses;
consolidation in our end client market;
efforts by the government to address the mortgage market and economic environment;
our clients’ relationships with government-sponsored enterprises;
our ability to adapt our solutions to technological changes or evolving industry standards or to achieve our growth strategies;
our ability to compete effectively;
increase in the availability of free or relatively inexpensive information;
our ability to protect our proprietary software and information rights;
infringement on the proprietary rights of others by our applications or services;
our dependence on our ability to access data from external sources;
our international operations and third-party service providers;
system failures or service interruptions;
delays or difficulty in developing or implementing new, enhanced or existing software, data or hosting solutions;
changes in general economic, business, regulatory and political conditions, particularly as they affect the mortgage industry;
risks associated with the recruitment and retention of our skilled workforce;
impacts to our business operations caused by the occurrence of a catastrophe or global crisis;
our investment in Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. ("DNB");
security breaches against our information systems or breaches involving our third-party vendors;
the adequacy of our policies and procedures;
regulatory developments with respect to use of consumer data and public records;
our reliance on third parties;

1

Tablecare and preservation of Contents

restrictions on our abilitythat asset. Under our codes of ethics, an amendment to pursue potential business opportunities under a non-competition agreement with Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") that we entered in connection with the spin-off from FNF (the "Distribution");
our ability to successfully consummate, integrate and achieve the intended benefits of acquisitions;
our existing indebtedness and any additional significant debt we incur;
change in London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) reporting practices and the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate;
litigation, investigations or other actions against us;
our charter and bylaws and provisions of Delaware law may discourage or prevent strategic transactions;
changes in the strength of the economy and housing market generally;
the market price of our common stock may be volatile; and
our intention not to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

See "Risk Factors" for a further descriptionwaiver or modification of these and other factors. Forany ethics policy applicable to our directors or executive officers must be disclosed to the reasons described above, we caution you against relying on any forward-looking statements, which should also be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speaks only as of the date on which we make it. Factors extent required under SEC and/or events that could cause our actual resultsNYSE rules. We intend to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We are not under any obligation (and expressly disclaimdisclose any such obligation) to updateamendment or alterwaiver by posting it on the Investors page of our forward-looking statements, whether as a resultwebsite at www.BlackKnightInc.com.

Copies of new information, future events or otherwise. You should carefully consider the possibility that actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements.

2

TableCode of Contents

Part I

Item 1.           Business

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to "Black Knight," the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" are to Black Knight, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Conduct and its subsidiaries ("BKI").

Overview

Black Knight is a premier provider of integrated, innovative, mission-critical, high-performance software solutions, data and analytics to the U.S. mortgage and real estate markets. Our mission is to transform the markets we serve by delivering innovative solutions that are integrated across the homeownership lifecycle and that result in realized efficiencies, reduced risk and new opportunities for our clients to help them achieve greater levels of success.

We believe our clients leverage our robust, integrated solutions across the entire homeownership lifecycle to help retain existing customers, gain new customers, mitigate risk and operate more efficiently. Our clients rely on our proven, comprehensive and scalable solutionsEthics and our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional client support to achieve their strategic goals and better serve their customers.Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available for review on the Investors page of our website at www.BlackKnightInc.com.

Audit Committee

We have a focused strategystanding audit committee. The members of continuous innovation across our business, which is supported by acquisitions,audit committee are Joseph M. Otting (Chair), John D. Rood and even more importantly, the integration of those acquisitions and our innovations into our broader ecosystem. Our ability to effectively manage our business and maintain a strong client base allows us to continually invest in our business, both to meet ever-changing industry requirements and to maintain our position as a leading provider of platforms for the mortgage and real estate markets.

Deep business and regulatory expertise along with a holistic viewNancy L. Shanik. The board has determined that each of the markets we serve allow usaudit committee members is financially literate and independent as required by the privilege of being a trusted advisor to our clients, who range from the nation’s largest lenders and mortgage servicers to institutional portfolio managers and government entities, to individual real estate agents and mortgage brokers. Clients leverage our software ecosystem across a range of real estate and housing finance verticals through multiple digital channels, using our offerings to drive more business, reduce risk and deliver a best-in-class customer experience, all while operating more efficiently and cost-effectively.

We have long-standing relationships with our clients, a majority of whom enter into long-term contracts that include multiple, integrated products embedded into mission-critical processes. This speaks to the confidence our clients have in our solutions and our commitment to serve them. The contractual nature of our revenues and our client relationships make our revenues both highly visible and recurring in nature. Our scale and integrated ecosystem of solutions drive significant operating leverage and cross-sell opportunities, enabling our clients to continually benefit from new and greater operational efficiencies.

Overviewrules of the Markets We ServeSEC and NYSE, and that each of Mr. Otting, Mr. Rood and Ms. Shanik is an audit committee financial expert, as defined by the rules of the SEC.

The Black Knight ecosystem stretches across four core “pillar” verticals: mortgage loan servicing, mortgage loan origination, real estate and capital markets; with our data and analytics flowing throughout the interconnected ecosystem of solutions. As we integrate our innovations and acquired technologies, we are committed to continually improving the end consumer experience, driving further efficiencies for our clients and helping them to win new customers and retain existing customers.


Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Mortgage Loan ServicingCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND

Once mortgage loans have been originated, the loans are onboarded to a servicing platform where servicers manage the loan and can provide borrowers and investors with information about those loans. Mortgage servicers (and sub-servicers) operate within a highly regulated industry segment and are responsible for overseeing the ongoing loan maintenance, payment collection, application process, escrow management, investor management, tax and insurance payments, etc. for approximately 66 million active first and second lien mortgage loans and lines of credit in the U.S.

3

Table of ContentsANALYSIS AND EXECUTIVE AND

Mortgage servicing is typically a long-term relationship between the customer and the servicer; and, the customer’s servicing experience can have a direct impact on the servicer’s ability to retain loans in its portfolios.

The number of first lien mortgage loans being serviced in the U.S. remains relatively consistent even through housing and economic downturns and changes in interest rates. The number of second lien mortgage loans being serviced can fluctuate according to factors such as available, or “tappable,” equity levels, interest rates and individual portfolio appetite for such loans. Refer to the Business Trends and Conditions section of Item 7 - Management’sDIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following discussion and analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for market data estimates for active first and second lien mortgage loans.

In times of economic stress, a servicer’s ability to manage their workload is often tested by distressed mortgages, defaults, foreclosure and bankruptcy actions. In such periods, loss mitigation, default processing, bankruptcy and more mustcompensation arrangements should be contended with, along with an ever-changing slate of regulatory requirements. The mortgage default process is long and complex and involves multiple parties, a significant exchange of data and documentation and extensive regulatory requirements. Innovative and trusted technology is essential in navigating this process efficiently and effectively.

Mortgage Origination

Mortgage origination is a complex process with multiple stages involving various parties, all of which are under high levels of regulatory scrutiny. Historically, many aspects of this process have been managed manually by lenders and other parties involved in the process, increasing the cost and complexity to originate a loan. The shift of consumer expectations and demands in recent years, which was accelerated by the pandemic, has created an increased demand for innovative solutions and the acceptance of digital technologies to meet the needs of market participants.

The U.S. mortgage origination market consists of both purchase and refinance loans, including cash-out refinances, and, to a lesser extent, second lien, equity-centric products such as home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”). Participants in this market range from the largest U.S. banks, nonbanks and credit-union lenders; to independent and mid-sized banks; to wholesale and correspondent lenders; to mortgage brokerages and even the individual mortgage broker. Refer to the Business Trends and Conditions section of Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for market data estimates for the number of mortgage loans originated.

Real Estate

The consumer journey to homeownership starts with identifying a property to purchase. The marketing, sales and purchase of real estate in the U.S. involves many participants. Needs exist for digital workflow, seamless data transfer between multiple sources and parties, and marketing and communication tools at the agent, broker and multiple listing service (“MLS”) levels.

Black Knight supports all participants in this process with technology to increase efficiencies, create new opportunities and manage complex workflows for all involved.

Capital Markets

The mortgage capital markets, both primary and secondary, play a critical role as providers of funding and liquidity that enable lenders to make home loans to borrowers. Mortgage loans are made possible in large part by market participants buying, selling or holding mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and loan portfolios.

Preeminent among capital market participants are the government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), who, alongread with the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA” or “Ginnie Mae”), the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”)compensation tables and the Veterans Administration (“VA”), provide back-stop guarantees to support market stability and help minimize systemic risk.

Market oversight is performed by federal and state regulators with the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Federal Finance Housing Agency (“FHFA”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

4

Table of Contents

(“OCC”) and the Consumer Financial Protection Board (“CFPB”) all playing major roles in ensuring market transparency, financial institution safety and soundness and consumer protection.

The informed investment in and trading of mortgage loans and MBS is dependent upon reliable, quality data at both the pool and loan level, plus robust analytics and the tools to use them effectively. An incredible amount of information gathering and assessing goes into making these investment decisions. Dealing with pools or portfolios of real estate or mortgage-related assets requires even more information. Loan-level mortgage performance, real estate price trends and credit-risk data are valuable and necessary insights needed by capital market participants to make informed decisions.

In the age of “big data,” this level of detailed information equates to many terabytes of data points, which can be an overwhelming amount of data to sift through and analyze without the right tools and solutions; however,related disclosures that data can provide critical insights for those who can effectively decipher it.

Market Trends

Market trends that have spurred lenders and servicers to seek software, data and analytics solutions are as follows:

Lenders increasingly focused on core operations. As a result of a decline in origination volumes and the increasing cost to originate a mortgage loan, we believe lenders have become more focused on their core operations, including ways to reduce or eliminate certain costs. According to the MBA Quarterly Performance Report as of November 21, 2022, the cost to originate a loan has more than doubled since 2008 and increased 22% in 2022 compared to 2021. We believe lenders are increasingly shifting from in-house solutions to third-party solutions that provide a more comprehensive and efficient solution. Lenders require these providers to deliver best-in-class solutions and deep domain expertise and to assist them in maintaining regulatory compliance.

Integral role of technology in the U.S. mortgage market. Over the past decade, homebuyers’ processes have become more digital, and banks and other lenders and servicers have become increasingly focused on automation and workflow management to operate more efficiently and meet their regulatory requirements as well as using technology to enhance the consumer experience during the mortgage loan origination, closing, and servicing processes. Technology providers must be able to support the complexity and dynamic nature of the market, display extensive industry knowledge and possess the financial resources to make the necessary investments in technology and software to support lenders and servicers. This includes an enhanced digital experience along with the application of artificial intelligence, robotic process automation and adaptive learning.

Heightened demand for enhanced transparency and analytic insight. As the U.S. mortgage loan market participants work to minimize risk in lending, servicing and capital markets, they rely on the integration of data and analytics with solutions that enhance the decision-making process. These industry participants are eager for timely data and insights to help them plan and react to the changing environment.

Regulatory changes and oversight. Most U.S. mortgage loan market participants are subject to a high level of regulatory oversight and regulatory requirements as federal and state governments have enacted various new laws, rules and regulations. It is our experience that mortgage lenders and servicers have become more focused on minimizing the risk of non-compliance with regulatory requirements and look for solutions that assist them in complying with their regulatory requirements. We expect this trend to continue as additional governmental programs and regulations have been enacted to address the economic concerns resulting from the pandemic, and our clients have had to adapt their systems and processes in record time to the shifting landscape. In addition, our clients and our clients’ regulators have elevated their focus on privacy and data security in light of an increased level of cybersecurity incidents. We expect the industry focus on privacy and data security to continue to increase.

Solutions for the Markets We Serve

Our business is organized into two segments: Software Solutions and Data and Analytics. Together they represent an integrated ecosystem that spans the entirety of the real estate and mortgage continuum, from homebuying and selling to loan origination, through loan servicing and capital markets and back again.

5

Table of Contents

The Black Knight ecosystem lets clients access a comprehensive, integrated software and workflow management solution set via multiple segment-specific digital channels. Enhanced by large mortgage-specific datasets and robust proprietary analytics, our ecosystem helps our clients achieve greater levels of success from a trusted provider that continually delivers innovative technologies across our ecosystem.

Graphic

Software Solutions

Our Software Solutions segment includes proven and trusted platforms that facilitate, automate and enhance many mission-critical business processes across the mortgage loan lifecycle continuum. Our offerings help clients in this segment, primarily mortgage lenders, servicers and investors, reduce costs, improve operations and provide an exceptional customer experience. Our software solutions are developed to meet the current and future needs of the markets we serve. In developing and delivering our products and solutions, we leverage a combination of private cloud, public cloud, application programming interfaces (“APIs”) and a host of other technology-forward approaches to best meet the needs of our vast and strong client base.

As a result of our leadership, combined with our extensive knowledge of the mortgage industry and technology, we are uniquely positioned to drive innovation in this space and bring the digital revolution to mortgage servicing for both borrowers and servicers alike. While we relentlessly pursue the enhancement of the consumer experience throughout the real estate and mortgage continuum, we are equally focused on innovating on the back end for servicers as well.

Servicing Software Solutions

MSP® is a SaaS solution that supports first lien mortgages and home equity loans and lines of credit, on a single platform. This complete, scalable, end-to-end system is used by servicers and sub-servicers to manage all servicing processes, including loan setup and maintenance, escrow administration, investor reporting, regulatory requirements and more. MSP® helps servicers increase efficiency, reduce operating costs and improve risk mitigation for approximately 36 million active loans currently serviced on the system.follow.

MSP® serves as the core system of record and is enhanced with innovative digital solutions, all of which were developed using the most appropriate, forward-leaning technologies and are seamlessly integrated into the system of record. Servicing DigitalSM has seen tremendous adoption since its launch in 2018, with the majority of MSP® clients now offering the white-labeled, consumer facing application to their customers.

Servicing DigitalSM is an interactive, user-friendly web and mobile solution for consumers that provides easy access to customized, timely information about their mortgages. This powerful application supports deeper customer relationships for our clients and engagement by enabling their customers to make mortgage payments and explore opportunities for refinancing and more, all from the convenience of the web or a mobile device. By providing value-added services and information to borrowers, Servicing DigitalSM helps improve customer retention and serves as a direct communication channel between servicer and borrower.

6

Table of Contents

Servicing DigitalSM is integrated with our Customer ServiceSM solution, which allows our clients’ customer service representatives to have access to the same information and layout a customer sees to better facilitate successful interactions and outcomes, which is key to increasing borrower retention. We launched Developer PortalSM in January 2023, which provides clients, third-party providers and their developers access to our growing catalog of APIs across the mortgage life cycle. APIs expose business functionality and data that are packaged into reusable services that follow industry standard protocols and conventions to allow ease of integration. Clients can use our APIs to rapidly embed additional functionality within their applications, driving intuitive and frictionless experiences.

Our default servicing solutions help simplify the complex process for loans that move into default, while supporting servicers with their compliance requirements. As part of this suite, we offer an advanced Loss MitigationSM solution to facilitate more efficient loss mitigation processes. This feature-rich, web-based solution supports industry-standard retention and liquidation workouts to streamline the loss mitigation process and reduce risk. It is also available to consumers through Servicing DigitalSM and uses advanced rules and logic to guide users through processes step-by-step, including validation points throughout the workflow, to reduce missed steps and overlooked information. When loans move through the loss-mitigation process and become non-performing loans, our suite of innovative default servicing solutions help servicers reduce cycle times, decrease operating costs and improve efficiencies throughout the bankruptcy, foreclosure and claims stages.

We also offer advanced technology to support the bankruptcy and foreclosure process, and more efficiently manage claims related to properties in foreclosure, as well as tools to support loss analysis, helping servicers make the right decisions at the right time.

Origination Software Solutions

Our Empower® loan origination system (“LOS”) was developed to be hosted in a public or private cloud. The platform’s advanced automation capabilities, lights-out processing and seamless integrations with our other and third-party services help fulfill, streamline and improve upon the many pieces of the origination process. Integrated pipeline analytics, AI-powered underwriter efficiency tools, fee services, settlement services fulfillment, an advanced eClosing platform and more all combine to create a frictionless process that benefits both borrower and lender alike. In recognition of the dynamic nature of mortgage markets, Empower® offers maximum flexibility by giving lenders the ability to originate first lien mortgages, second lien mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit, and supporting retail, consumer‐direct, home equity, correspondent, wholesale and assumption channels on a single, unified platform.

We also offer product, pricing and eligibility (PPE) engines for brokers and lenders that allow lenders and brokers to provide borrowers with loan product and pricing options to meet the consumer’s needs. Our Optimal Blue PPE serves the retail market by providing lenders with access to hundreds of investors and the mortgage products they offer.

Our Borrower DigitalSM solution enables lenders to offer our AI-enhanced digital point of sale to walk their loan applicants through a friendly and intuitive prequalification/qualification Q&A, with seamless data transfer to lender systems. Customer engagement is active, immediate and targeted, and presents a smooth front end to a process that will carry the loan applicant, and a single source/repository of their data, all the way through to closing and beyond. We also drive the full origination and underwriting workflow for lenders of all sizes via our Empower® LOS.

Additionally, our digital loan officer technology makes the day-to-day lives of loan officers more productive through vastly simplified workflows while also helping them provide an exceptional level of service to loan applicants. With the same anytime, anywhere convenience provided by all of our consumer-facing digital products, Loan Officer DigitalSM facilitates seamless interaction between the loan officer and loan applicant throughout the entire process, from application to close. With the loan applicant engaged via the Borrower DigitalSM interface, Loan Officer DigitalSM enables loan officers to remain connected with their customers, providing timely updates and assistance when needed. Again, all data is captured and can be shared with our Empower® LOS.

After loan approval, loan applicants can view their loan status, review their closing package and eSign documents using our Expedite® Close solution. Loan applicants can also leverage our DocVerify® remote online notarization solution, making fully digital closings possible where legally permissible, with all activity tracked and logged for audit purposes.

7

Table of Contents

Recent trends show that consumers have been turning to mortgage brokers more often than before. Our LoanCatcher® cloud-based LOS, designed specifically for the needs of brokers, is both innovative and easy-to-use. It gives brokers affordable access to a robust software solution, integrated with the data and customer support solutions they need to provide exceptional levels of service to their customers.

In supportthis compensation discussion and analysis, we provide an overview of our focus on integration, LoanCatcher® is integrated withapproach to compensating our LoanSifter® PPEnamed executive officers in 2022, including the objectives of our compensation programs and is also designed to meet the very specific needs of the broker community by providing access to hundreds of investorsprinciples upon which our compensation programs and thousands of loan products. All of this combined with system-agnostic delivery to whatever LOS their wholesale lender partnersdecisions are using provides brokers with a truly end-to-end solution to manage and grow their businesses.based. In 2022, our named executive officers were:

Generating and fostering new leads is critical to growing a lender’s business. Creating customers for life is equally as important and becomes increasingly more important as interest rates rise. To help create long-term customers and earn repeat business, we offer lenders the SurefireSM

·Anthony M. Jabbour, Executive Chairman

 solution, which helps lenders close more loans by providing communications the lenders can send through an automated system to their customers throughout the mortgage process. The SurefireSM

·Joseph M. Nackashi, Chief Executive Officer

 system distributes leads, nurtures them to application, educates and informs borrowers throughout the application and funding process, and provides omni-channel outreach post-close designed to capture repeat business. We believe the key to cultivating lifelong clients is keeping in touch, and SurefireSM

·Kirk T. Larsen, President and Chief Financial Officer

’s milestone tracking allows users to reach customers with personalized, relevant content.

·Michael L. Gravelle, Executive Vice President and General Counsel
·Michele M. Meyers, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer (until March 12, 2022)

Our CompassEdge hedging and trading platform supports originators of every size by providing sophisticated pipeline risk management tools and analytics, as well as dynamic loan sale and mortgage servicing rights valuation functionality.

Data and Analytics

Our Data and Analytics segment is comprised of our extensive data offerings, proven credit and prepayment models, custom and proprietary analytics, valuation and MLS solutions and much more. In addition, the integration of data and insights from solutions in this segment informs, supports and enhances our other software solutions to help lenders and servicers make more informed decisions, improve performance, identify and predict risk and generate more qualified leads.Executive Leadership Transition

We have aggregated one of the largest residential real estate data sets currently available in the U.S. This data set is derived from both proprietary and public record sources. From nationwide MLS listings to our industry-leading McDash® loan-level mortgage loan performance data, to public property records covering more than 99.9% of the U.S. population, our datasets are indispensable for those working with housing assets.

Leveraging this data, subject to any applicable restrictions, alongside our long history and deep understanding of the housing market, we have created detailed data solutions that assist in portfolio management, valuations, property records, lead generation and improved risk analysis for all aspects of servicing, origination, real estate and capital markets. In addition, we deliver data and analytics to clients in real estate, title insurance, MLS and other verticals that rely on property data-centric solutions to make informed decisions and run their businesses.

We also offer a highly accurate behavioral model built on our datasets and other third-party sources that forecasts prepayments, default, delinquencies and losses on residential mortgage loans and securities. Used for portfolio analysis, our AFTSM solution can serve as a powerful risk mitigation tool as well as a key component of any data-driven retention efforts.

Accurate valuations are critical to any real-estate transaction. Our automated valuation models (“AVMs”) are built on the foundation of our property data, proprietary information, proven methodologies and advanced user and performance testing and deliver exceptionally reliable automated property valuations.

To better understand the housing market, we also leverage MLS and property data to provide near-real-time daily data views of the housing market, looking at home prices, inventory levels, days on market and other key indicators at the state, core based statistical areas and zip code levels.

8

Table of Contents

We also provide data solutions that enable our clients to analyze big data sets through the synergistic convenience of a single data science workspace. Our cloud-based enterprise data and analytics solution, RAP®, is an interactive data science platform that allows clients to quickly aggregate data from our extensive mortgage and housing data marketplace with their own data sources to execute both custom and proprietary queries.

Our real estate focused clients leverage our market-leading software solution for regional MLS associations to manage property listings. The platform also enables membership management, provides tools for collaboration with loan officers and other affiliates and marketing tools to effectively meet dynamic market challenges.

Focus on Value-Driven Innovation

The value our clients place on innovation can be seen in the adoption rates of the next-gen products we have delivered. When developing and delivering our products, we leverage a combination of private cloud, public cloud, APIs and a host of other technology-forward options that allow us to deliver innovative solutions to market quickly in response to address our clients’ biggest challenges.

Our solutions are designed to be scalable, secure, flexible, standards-based and web-connected for easy use. Further, we have a proven history of bringing solutions to market quickly due to investments we have made in integrating and streamlining our software and development processes.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe our competitive strengths include the following:

Market leadership with comprehensive and integrated solutions. We are a leading provider of comprehensive and integrated solutions for the markets we serve. This leadership position is the result of strong client relationships, our knowledgeable employees who are focused on delivering superior solutions and support and delivering innovative solutions.

We have used this insight to develop a comprehensive, integrated ecosystem of proprietary software, data and analytics solutions to automate many of the mortgage and real estate markets’ mission-critical business processes. These integrated solutions reduce manual processes, help improve organizational compliance and mitigate risk, and ultimately deliver significant cost savings to our clients.

Broad and deep client relationships with significant recurring revenues. We have long-standing, relationships with many of our clients. We frequently enter into long-term contracts with our software solutions clients that contain a base subscription fee with additional fees that are activity-based. Our products are typically embedded within our clients’ mission-critical workflow and decision-making processes across various parts of their organizations.

Extensive data assets and analytics capabilities. We develop and maintain large, accurate and comprehensive data sets on the real estate and mortgage markets that we believe are competitively differentiated. Our unique data sets provide a combination of public and proprietary data, and each of our data records features many attributes. Our data scientists bring comprehensive analytical capabilities to bear against these data sets, subject to any applicable use restrictions, to create highly customized reports. These reports include models of customer behavior for originators and servicers, portfolio analytics for capital markets and government agencies and proprietary market insights for real estate market participants. As mentioned, our data and analytics capabilities are also embedded into our software solutions and workflow products to provide actionable insights.

Scalable and cost-effective operating model. Our market position, hosted software solutions and large client base have allowed us to develop a highly attractive and scalable operating model that provides us with significant benefits. Our scale and operating leverage allow us to add clients to our existing platforms with limited incremental cost. By leveraging our scale and market position, we can make cost-effective investments in our software solutions to assist with complex regulatory and compliance requirements, which we believe increases our value proposition to clients.

9

Table of Contents

Our Strategy

Our comprehensive integrated solutions ecosystem; unique, robust data and analytic capabilities; differentiated business model; broad and deep client relationships; and other competitive strengths put us in a very strong position to pursue multiple avenues for growth opportunities. We intend to continue to expand and grow our business throughDuring 2022, the following key strategies:executive leadership transitions occurred effective May 16, 2022:

Win new clients. We intend to attract new clients by demonstrating the value proposition provided by our software and comprehensive solutions offering. In addition to top tier mortgage loan originators and servicers, where we have had and continue to have success, we believe there continues to be a significant opportunity to penetrate the mid-tier mortgage loan originators and servicers, as well as mortgage broker, markets. We believe these institutions can benefit from our proven solutions suite to address complex regulatory requirements and compete more effectively in the evolving mortgage loan market. We intend to continue to pursue all of these channels and benefit from the low incremental cost of adding new clients to our scalable applications and infrastructure.

Cross-sell existing products. The Black Knight ecosystem offers a wide variety of opportunities for existing clients to reap further benefits when they increase their use of our solutions across the real estate and mortgage continuum through integrations and seamless data sharing. It therefore also represents a substantial opportunity for growth as we seek to assist our clients in realizing the value of additional offerings and the benefits they provide. We intend to broaden and deepen existing client relationships through cross sales of solutions, data and analytics that reveal opportunity for client-side improvement of one form or another. We aim to help our clients see the true benefit of our fully integrated solutions ecosystem and the compound value of leveraging multiple solutions simultaneously. Helping our clients better focus on their core businesses and customers will put us in a better position to expand those existing relationships while adding value.

Solution development and innovation. Our long-term vision is to continue to lead through innovation and to maintain our leadership role in providing software, data and analytics to the mortgage and real estate markets. We intend to continue to innovate with urgency and integrate new solutions with our platforms in ways that bring the most value to our clients and their customers. We have a strong track record of introducing and developing new solutions that are tailored to specific industry trends and enhance our clients’ core operating functions. By working in partnership with key clients, we have been able to develop and market new and advanced solutions that meet the evolving demands of the mortgage and consumer loan, real estate and capital markets verticals. In addition, we will continue to develop and leverage insights from our large public and proprietary data assets to further improve our client value proposition.

Selectively pursue acquisitions. The core focus of our strategy is to grow organically. However, we may selectively evaluate acquisition opportunities that would allow us to expand our footprint, broaden our client base and deepen our product and service offerings. We believe there are meaningful benefits that result from acquiring companies that provide best-in-class single point solutions. Integrating and cross selling these point solutions into our broader client base and integrating acquisitions into our efficient operating environment would potentially result in revenues and cost synergies. Additionally, new directions for product development often materialize when acquired companies are integrated into the wider ecosystem.

Our Clients

We provide solutions to financial institutions, mortgage lenders and servicers, mortgage brokers, investors, attorneys, trustees and real estate professionals.

The U.S. mortgage loan industry is concentrated among the top 25 institutions, and our most significant and long-term relationships tend to follow the industry landscape. The number of solutions being used by each client in this category continues to grow, as the compounded value of multiple of our products becomes clearer over time. Because of the depth of these relationships, we derive a significant portion of our revenues from our largest clients.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, our five largest clients accounted for approximately 23% of our consolidated revenues and approximately 25% of our Software Solutions segment revenues. However, the revenues in each case are

10

Table of Contents

spread across a range of services and are subject to multiple, separate contracts. Although the diversity of the services we provide to each of these clients reduces the risk that we would lose all of the revenues associated with any of these clients, a significant deterioration in our relationships with or the loss of any one or more of these clients could have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition. See Item 1A. Risk Factors of Part I of this Report.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on generating new leads to both securing new clients in our target markets, as well as cross sell our integrated solutions ecosystem to existing clients.

Regardless of the market we are serving, our sales and marketing strategy remains the same: communicate how our solutions address the challenges facing a specific market and deliver those messages where the companies we serve are engaging. We establish relationships, deliver proven solutions and continually build trust. Our experienced sales personnel are subject matter experts in our services, the needs of our clients and the markets we serve.

We are able to effectively communicate the value of our ecosystem by developing and delivering solutions that move the needle by helping our clients achieve greater levels of success. We know that references from colleagues in the industry are one of the top reasons a provider is selected, so we remain committed to delivering powerful solutions that cultivate those references.

Our relationships with so many different companies across the real estate and mortgage sectors provide us with a unique opportunity to gain insight into trends and challenges facing the industry. We couple that with thoughtful analysis of our vast data assets to develop solutions and provide industry insights others cannot. We are also focused on sharing that thought leadership with our clients, the media, the public and our entire industry.

To understand what will help our various and disparate market segments succeed, we also conduct market research through conversations with clients and prospects, market surveys, industry reports and discussions with other industry leaders. Likewise, we also host client user groups and participate in user forums to understand the needs and concerns of the everyday users of our solutions.

We deliver our messages where the companies we serve are congregating, through tradeshows, events, publications, digital channels, etc., and engage them in conversations that highlight the many differentiators/competitive advantages we provide through our continual innovations. We engage with existing clients on a regular basis and continually focus on engaging with prospective clients. Given the broad range of solutions we offer, we have significant opportunity to expand our sales to our existing client base through cross-selling efforts.

We have a core team of account managers who cross-sell solutions to existing clients at the top-tier and mid-tier U.S. mortgage loan originators and servicers, as well as a number of other financial institutions, investors and real estate professionals. We engage in strategic account reviews, during which our executives share their knowledge of clients and the market to determine the best sales approach on a client-by-client basis. As a result, we believe we have created an effective cross-selling culture within our organization.

Research and Development

Our research and development activities are core to our corporate mission of transforming the industry through innovation. As such, they relate to the design, development, integration and enhancement of the software applications that make up our solution ecosystem. We expect to continue our practice of investing an appropriate level of resources to maintain, enhance and extend the functionality of our existing proprietary systems and software applications; to develop new and innovative systems and software applications in response to the needs of our clients as well as market and regulatory conditions and to enhance the capabilities of the ecosystem infrastructure. We work with our clients to determine the appropriate timing and approach to introducing technology or infrastructure changes to our applications and services.

11

Table of Contents

Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of contractual restrictions, internal security practices and copyright and trade secret laws to establish and protect our software, technology, data and expertise. Further, we have developed strong brand recognition, which has helped us accumulate goodwill in the marketplace, and we rely on the above to protect our rights in that area. We intend to continue our policy of taking all measures we deem necessary to protect our copyright, trade secret and trademark rights.

Competition

The multiple business verticals in which we engage are highly competitive. We believe that compounded benefits of our integrated ecosystem of software and data and analytics solutions represent a value proposition that is strong and wholly unique to us. Our economies of scale in the mortgage loan origination and servicing markets also provide us with a distinct competitive advantage in each of these categories. Based on our knowledge of the industry and competitors, we believe that no single competitor is capable of delivering the depth and breadth of solutions we are able to offer.

Competitive factors in processing businesses include the quality of the technology-based application or service, application features and functions, ease of delivery and integration, ability of the provider to maintain, enhance and support the applications or services and pricing.

Software Solutions. Our Software Solutions segment competes with our clients’ internal technology departments and other third-party providers of similar systems. Competitive factors include the quality of the technology-based application or service, application features and functions, ease of delivery and integration, ability of the provider to maintain, enhance and support the applications or services, client support and pricing. We believe that our ability to deliver proven and integrated software solutions, the adoption rate of our solutions, our focus on supporting our clients on a daily basis and the economies of scale we offer in the mortgage loan processing business provide us with a competitive advantage in each of these categories.

Data and Analytics. In our Data and Analytics segment, we compete primarily with third-party providers of similar data assets, including certain niche providers, and in-house capabilities. We compete based on the breadth and depth of our data; the exclusive nature of some of our key data sets; robust proprietary analytics and the capabilities to produce highly customized reports. We believe that the quality of the data we offer is distinguished by the broad range of our data sources, including non-public sources; the volume of records we maintain; our ability to integrate our data and analytics across our ecosystem; and the ability to leverage our market leading position in the mortgage loan origination and servicing industries.

Government Regulations

Various aspects of our businesses are subject to federal and state regulations. Our failure to comply with any applicable laws and regulations could result in restrictions on our ability to provide certain services, as well as the possible imposition of civil fines and criminal penalties.

As a provider of electronic data processing to financial institutions, such as banks and credit unions, we are subject to regulatory oversight and examination by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council ("FFIEC"), an interagency body of the Federal Reserve Board ("FRB"), the CFPB, the federal banking agencies and various other federal and state regulatory authorities. We also may be subject to possible review by state agencies that regulate banks in each state in which we conduct our electronic processing activities.

Our financial institution clients are required to comply with various privacy laws and regulations under state and federal law, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. These laws and regulations place restrictions on the use of non-public personal information. All financial institutions must disclose detailed privacy policies to their customers and offer them the opportunity to direct the financial institution not to share information with third parties. The regulations, however, permit financial institutions to share information with non-affiliated parties who perform services for the financial institutions. As a provider of services to financial institutions, we are required to comply with the same privacy regulations

12

Table of Contents

and are generally bound by the same limitations on disclosure of the information received from our clients as those that apply to the financial institutions themselves.

Many consumer advocates, privacy advocates and government regulators believe that existing laws and regulations do not adequately protect privacy or ensure the accuracy of consumer-related data. As a result, multiple consumer privacy laws have been implemented at the state level which regulate the acquisition, dissemination, and commercial use of personal information. These consumer privacy laws include the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), as modified by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) which was effective January 1, 2023; the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (“VCDPA”) which was effective January 1, 2023; the Colorado Privacy Act (“CPA”) which will be effective July 1, 2023; the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CTDPA”) which will be effective July 1, 2023; and the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (“UCPA”) which will be effective December 31, 2023. Generally, these laws seek to implement further restrictions on the acquisition, dissemination, and commercial use of personal information and also contemplate requirements relative to data accuracy, the ability of consumers to opt out of certain processing of personal information, the right to access personal information and to obtain a copy, and the right to delete personal information in certain circumstances. These laws are directly applicable to our clients as well as to us in certain circumstances and are applicable to us in a reduced capacity when we act as service providers to our clients.  

Laws such as the Vermont Act Relating to Data Brokers and Consumer Protection (the “Vermont Data Broker Law”) also place restrictions and requirements on the use of publicly available data, and laws such as the New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies (“NY DFS Cybersecurity Regulation”) provide for certain security requirements surrounding the collection and maintenance of certain business and consumer nonpublic personal information.

Increased scrutiny of all parties involved in the mortgage loan industry by governmental authorities has included federal and state government review of all aspects of the mortgage lending business, including an increased legislative and regulatory focus on consumer protection practices. Future legislative or regulatory changes are difficult to predict and new laws or regulations that may be implemented by the CFPB or other regulatory bodies may require us to change our business practices or cause us to incur increased costs to comply.

Information Technology and Security

We are highly dependent on information technology networks and systems to securely process, transmit and store electronic information. Attacks on information technology systems continue to grow in frequency, complexity and sophistication and we expect this trend to continue. Such attacks have become a point of focus for individuals, businesses and governmental entities. These attacks can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information of consumers and proprietary business information. Refer to the "Risks Related to Information Security" section of Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information.

We protect our data assets by providing centralized security solutions and enforcing a defense-in-depth, centralized model that includes deterring, detecting, preventing, analyzing and containing security incidents. We focus on all areas of cybersecurity including threat and vulnerability management, security monitoring, identity and access management, phishing awareness, risk oversight, third-party risk management, disaster recovery and continuity management. We make strategic investments in information security to protect our clients and our information systems. This includes both capital expenditures and operating expenses for hardware, software, personnel and consulting services.

As our primary solutions and services evolve, we apply a comprehensive approach to the mitigation of identified security risks. We have established policies, including those related to privacy, information security and cybersecurity, and we employ a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques.

Enterprise Risk Management: We maintain a comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") program that provides the framework to align our risk appetite and strategy to enhance management of enterprise risks, including information security risks. Through our ERM program, we analyze risks inherent to our products, services and businesses, and develop appropriate plans to mitigate those risks. Our executive-level Enterprise Risk and Compliance Committee convenes regularly to discuss matters relating to our enterprise risk position and·

13

Table of Contents

risk management, suchAnthony M. Jabbour, our former Chief Executive Officer, transitioned from his role as third-party risk, phishing, security incident response, application resiliency, environmental, socialCEO and governance responsibilities and external and internal vulnerabilities. The Risk Committeeassumed the role of our BoardExecutive Chairman of Directors oversees the ERM and Compliance programs through regular reports from our Chief Risk Officer, Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, and reports on these matters to our board of directors.
Compliance: Our Compliance function provides the standards and policies to mitigate identified risks, as well as training for our employees on applicable privacy, security, legal and regulatory requirements that provide ongoing enhancement of our security and risk culture.
Internal Audit: Our Internal Audit function provides independent and objective assurance services designed to improve the Company’s operations. Internal Audit focuses a significant portion of their time and resources to the audit of information technology and security. The Internal Audit department is established by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and it directly oversees its results and operations.

Human Capital Management

We power the markets we serve by delivering innovative, mission-critical solutions. Our employees are a key factor in our success. Our most important priorities are the health and safety of our employees and helping the communities where we work and live.

We are passionate about giving our employees the tools to equip them for success in their careers, providing the health and wellness benefits and other online resources needed for physical, mental and social well-being, and delivering on diversity and inclusion initiatives to let every employee know they are valued and respected.

We realize our individual differences are what strengthen us collectively. We are committed to supporting a culture that is representative of the unique values, opinions, cultures and needs of our employees, clients and communities. Through internal programs, including employee training and leadership development, affinity groups, comprehensive benefits and a hands-on leadership team, we support our employees throughout their career.

We strive to attract and retain the most talented employees in the industry by offering competitive compensation and investing in our employees to help them achieve goals inside and outside of the office.

As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately 6,100 employees. None of our workforce is unionized. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider our relations with employees to be good.

Recent Developments

Refer to the Recent Developments section in Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information on the proposed ICE Transaction as well as the February 2022 Optimal Blue transaction and the January 2023 TitlePoint transaction.

Additional Information

Our website address is www.blackknightinc.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). However, the information found on our website is not part of this or any other report.

14

Table of Contents

Item 1A.           Risk Factors

In addition to the normal risks of business, we are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those listed below and others described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the risks described herein could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Summary

The following summarizes some of the key risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect us. You should read this summary together with the more detailed description of each risk factor contained below.

Risk Related to the Proposed Merger with Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”)

Holders of our common stock cannot be certain of the market value of the consideration they will receive in the Merger.
The Merger will not be completed unless important conditions are satisfied or waived.
Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated.
The Merger Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms.
We are subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending.
Uncertainties associated with the Merger may cause a loss of our management personnel and other key employees.
Litigation related to the Merger could prevent or delay completion of the Merger or otherwise negatively affect ICE’s and our businesses and operations.
ICE and we are expected to incur significant costs related to the Merger.

Business and Industry

We rely on our top clients for a significant portion of our revenues and profits.
The time and expense associated with switching from our competitors’ software and services to ours may limit our growth.
We may fail to meet contractual commitments.
Our clients and we are subject to various governmental regulations.
There may be consolidation in our end-client market.
Participants in the mortgage loan industry are subject to efforts by the government to regulate the mortgage loan industry.
Our clients’ relationships with government-sponsored enterprises ("GSEs") are subject to change.
We may fail to adapt our solutions to technological changes or evolving industry standards and regulations.
We operate in a competitive business environment.
If the availability of free or relatively inexpensive information increases, the demand for some of our data and information solutions may decrease.
We rely upon proprietary technology and information rights.
Our applications, solutions, or services may be found to infringe the proprietary rights of others.
We depend on our ability to access data from external sources.
We have international operations and third-party service providers.
We may experience system failures or service interruptions.
We may experience delays or difficulty in developing or implementing new, enhanced or existing software, data or hosting solutions.
Our revenues are subject to changes in the mortgage lending industry affected by the strength of the economy and the housing market.

15

Table of Contents

We may fail to attract and retain enough qualified employees, including those with client relationships or support our technology and operations.
The extent to which health epidemics affect our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial conditions are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict.

Risks Related to Our Investment in DNB

Our investment in DNB may expose us to certain risks.

Risks Related to Cybersecurity and Data Privacy

We may be unable to protect our information systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches, including breaches involving third-party vendors, or we may be unable to provide adequate security in the electronic transmission of sensitive data.
Our cybersecurity policies and procedures may not be adequate.
We are subject to regulatory developments with respect to use of consumer data and public records.
We rely on third parties for our operations.

Risk Related to Our Structure

Certain executive officers and members of our Board of Directors have interests and positions that could present potential conflicts.
We are restricted from pursuing certain potential business opportunities under a non-competition agreement.

General Risk Factors

We may be unable to successfully consummate acquisitions or experience delays in integrating acquisitions.
We have substantial investments in recorded goodwill and other intangible assets.
Our indebtedness could have a negative effect on our financing options and liquidity position and could impose restrictions to us.
Our senior leadership team is critical to our continued success.
We are subject to current and future litigation, investigations or other actions against us.
Our charter and bylaws and provisions of Delaware law may discourage or prevent strategic transactions.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile.
We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

Risks Related to the Proposed Merger with ICE

Because the market price of ICE common stock may fluctuate, holders of our common stock cannot be certain of the market value of the consideration they will receive in the Merger.

Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 4, 2022 (the “Merger Agreement”) with ICE, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICE (“Sub”) will merge with and into Black Knight with Black Knight surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICE (the “Merger”). At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares of our common stock held by us as treasury stock, any of our subsidiaries (other than with respect to the Black Knight Employee Stock Purchase Plan), by ICE or any of ICE’s subsidiaries (including Sub), or by any holder who has properly exercised and perfected such holder’s demand for appraisal rights under Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and not effectively withdrawn or lost such holder’s rights to appraisal (collectively, “Excluded Shares”)) will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof, the following consideration (the “Merger Consideration”):

16

Table of Contents

an amount in cash equal to the sum, rounded to the nearest one tenth of a cent, of (x) $68.00 plus (y) the product, rounded to the nearest one tenth of a cent, of 0.1440 (the “Share Ratio”) multiplied by the average of the volume weighted averages of the trading prices of ICE common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on each of the ten consecutive trading days ending on (and including) the trading day that is three trading days prior to the date on which the Effective Time occurs (the “Average ICE Stock Price”) (such amount, the “Per Share Cash Consideration”);
a number of validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of ICE common stock as is equal to the quotient, rounded to the nearest one ten thousandth, of (x) the Per Share Cash Consideration divided by (y) the Average ICE Stock Price (such number of shares, the “Per Share Stock Consideration”); or
if no election is made by such holder, such Per Share Stock Consideration or Per Share Cash Consideration as is determined in accordance with the proration mechanism described below.

The election right for the holders of shares of our common stock will be subject to proration in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement such that (a) the total number of shares of our common stock to be converted into the right to receive the Per Share Cash Consideration will be equal to the quotient, rounded down to the nearest whole share, of $10,505,000,000 divided by the Per Share Cash Consideration and (b) all shares of our common stock not receiving the Per Share Cash Consideration (other than Excluded Shares) will be converted into the right to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration.

This Share Ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of either ICE common stock or our common stock. Changes in the price of ICE common stock prior to the Merger will affect the value that holders of our common stock will receive in the Merger. We and ICE are not permitted to terminate the Merger Agreement as a result, in and of itself, of any increase or decrease in the market price of ICE common stock or our common stock.

There is a time lapse between the date on which our stockholders voted to approve the Merger Agreement at the special meeting and the date on which our stockholders entitled to receive the Merger Consideration actually receive such consideration. The market value of ICE common stock may fluctuate during this period as a result of a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, regulatory considerations, including changes in U.S. monetary policy and its effect on global financial markets and on interest rates, changes in ICE’s or our business, operations and prospects, the global coronavirus pandemic and the related disruption to local, regional and global economic activity and financial markets, and the impact that any of the foregoing may have on ICE, us or the customers or other constituencies of ICE or us, many of which factors are beyond ICE’s or our control. Therefore, at the time our stockholders approved the Merger Agreement at the special meeting, they did not know the market value of the consideration to be received by holders of our common stock at the Effective Time of the Merger.

The Merger will not be completed unless important conditions are satisfied or waived.

Specified conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement must be satisfied or waived to complete the Merger. If the conditions are not satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived, the Merger will not occur or will be delayed, and we and ICE may lose some or all of the intended benefits of the Merger. The following conditions must be satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived before we and ICE are obligated to complete the Merger: (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting (this vote was obtained at the special meeting on September 21, 2022), (ii) the expiration or early termination of the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the Merger under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”), (iii) the absence of any law, injunction, order or other judgment, in each case whether temporary, preliminary or permanent, that is in effect and restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the Merger, (iv) the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-4 filed by ICE to register the shares of ICE common stock to be issued in the Merger (the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on August 19, 2022), (v) approval for listing on the NYSE of the shares of ICE common stock to be issued in the Merger, (vi) compliance by ICE and us in all material respects with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement that are required to be performed or complied with by the time of the closing and (vii) subject in most cases to exceptions that do not rise to the level of a Material Adverse Effect or a Parent Material Adverse Effect (each as defined in the Merger

17

Table of Contents

Agreement), the accuracy of representations and warranties made by us, respectively, in the Merger Agreement. The respective obligations of ICE and us to consummate the Merger are also subject to there not having occurred since the date of the Merger Agreement an event that has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect or a Material Adverse Effect, respectively.

If the Merger is not completed, each of ICE’s and our ongoing businesses, financial condition, financial results and stock price may be materially and adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Merger, ICE and we will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:

·Joseph M. Nackashi, our former President, assumed the market pricerole of our common stock or ICE common stock could decline to the extent the current market price reflects an assumption that the Merger will be completed;CEO.
ICE or we could owe a termination fee to the other party under certain circumstances;
if our Board of Directors seeks another business combination, our stockholders cannot be certain that we will be able to find a party willing to enter into a transaction on terms equivalent to or more attractive than the terms that ICE has agreed to in the Merger Agreement;
time and financial and other resources committed by ours and ICE’s management to matters relating to the Merger could otherwise have been devoted to pursing other beneficial opportunities;
ICE or we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets or from their customers, suppliers or employees;
ICE or our current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their roles following the completion of the Merger, which may have an adverse effect on ICE’s or our ability to attract or retain key management and other key personnel;
ICE and we will be required to pay costs relating to the Merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory, financing (including the redemption by ICE of $5 billion of its bonds at 101% of par value) and printing fees, whether or not the Merger is completed; and
ICE or we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against ICE or us to perform our respective obligations under the Merger Agreement.

Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated, that could have an adverse effect on ICE following the Merger or that are otherwise unacceptable to ICE.

Completion of the Merger is conditioned on, among other things, the expiration or early termination of the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act. There can be no assurance that this condition to the completion of the Merger will be satisfied on a timely basis or at all and there can be no assurance that, if regulatory approvals are granted, they will not result in the imposition of conditions, limitations, obligations or restrictions that have the effect of preventing the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, imposing additional material costs on or materially limiting the revenues of ICE following the Merger or otherwise reducing the anticipated benefits of the Merger, or result in the delay or abandonment of the Merger.

Under the Merger Agreement, ICE and we have agreed to use our respective reasonable best efforts to cause the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement to be consummated as soon as practicable and to obtain all approvals from any governmental entity or third party that are necessary, proper or advisable to consummate the Merger. In particular, each party has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to take promptly any and all steps necessary to avoid, eliminate or resolve each and every impediment and obtain all clearances, consents, approvals and waivers under U.S. antitrust laws so as to enable the parties to close the Merger as soon as practicable.

18

Table of Contents

The Merger Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger and may discourage other companies from trying to acquire us.

The Merger Agreement contains covenants that restrict our ability to, directly or indirectly, solicit, initiate, knowingly facilitate, knowingly encourage or knowingly induce any acquisition proposal, engage in any discussions or negotiations with any person relating to any takeover proposal, or provide any confidential or nonpublic information or data to any person relating to any takeover proposal, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, our Board of Directors was required to recommend that our stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay a termination fee of $398 million to ICE.

These provisions could discourage a potential third-party acquiror or merger partner that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of us or pursuing an alternative transaction from considering or proposing such a transaction.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated and we determine to seek another business combination, we may not be able to negotiate a transaction with another party on terms comparable to, or better than, the terms of the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the Merger may not be completed, which could negatively affect us.

The Merger Agreement is subject to a number of conditions that must be satisfied or waived in order to complete the Merger. These conditions to the closing of the Merger may not be satisfied in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the Merger may be delayed or may not be completed. In addition, if the Merger is not completed by the outside date, either ICE or we may choose not to proceed with the Merger, and the parties can mutually decide to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time. In addition, ICE or we may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement in certain other circumstances as set forth in the Merger Agreement.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated, there may be various consequences. For example, our business may have been impacted adversely by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the Merger. Additionally, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, the market price of our common stock could decline to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay a termination fee of $398 million to ICE.

We are subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending, which could adversely affect our business and operations.

In connection with the pendency of the Merger, we have seen that some customers, suppliers and other persons with whom we and/or ICE have a business relationship have delayed or deferred certain business decisions or may decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with ICE or us, as the case may be, as a result of the pending Merger or otherwise, which could negatively affect ICE’s or our respective revenues, earnings and/or cash flows, as well as the market price of ICE’s or our common stock, regardless of whether the Merger is completed.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to completing the Merger which may adversely affect our ability to execute certain of our business strategies, including the ability in certain cases to enter into or amend contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness or incur capital expenditures. Such limitations could adversely affect our business and operations and our ability to respond to changes in our business, the mortgage industry or broader economic conditions prior to the completion of the Merger.

Each of the risks described above may be exacerbated by delays or other adverse developments with respect to the completion of the Merger.

19

Table of Contents

In addition, subject to certain exceptions, we have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to carry on our business in the ordinary course and, to the extent consistent therewith, to use reasonable best efforts to preserve substantially intact our current business organizations, to keep available the services of our current officers and employees and to preserve our relationships with significant customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees, distributors, lessors and others having significant business dealings with us, in each case, during the period between the date of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger.

Uncertainties associated with the Merger may cause a loss of our management personnel and other key employees, which could adversely affect our business and operations.

ICE and we are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of our officers and other key employees to execute our business plans. Prior to completion of the Merger, current and prospective employees of ours and ICE may experience uncertainty about their roles within ICE following the completion of the Merger, which may have an adverse effect on ICE’s and our ability to attract or retain key management and other key personnel and could adversely affect our business and operations.

Litigation related to the Merger could prevent or delay completion of the Merger or otherwise negatively affect ICE’s and our businesses and operations.

ICE and we may incur costs in connection with the defense or settlement of any stockholder or other lawsuits filed in connection with the Merger. Such litigation could have an adverse effect on ICE’s and our financial condition and results of operations and could prevent or delay the completion of the Merger.

ICE and we are expected to incur significant costs related to the Merger and integration.

ICE and we have incurred and expect to incur substantial expenses in connection with the completion of the Merger. The substantial majority of these costs will be non-recurring expenses related to the Merger, including investment banking fees, legal fees and costs associated with financing the Merger, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees, severance/employee benefit-related costs, and other regulatory fees. ICE and we will also incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating integration plans for our combined mortgage services businesses. Some of these costs are payable regardless of whether the Merger is completed.

Risks Related to Our Business

We rely on our top clients for a significant portion of our revenues and profits, which makes us susceptible to the same macro-economic and regulatory factors that affect our clients. If these clients are negatively affected by economic or regulatory conditions or otherwise experience financial hardship or stress, or if we are unable to renew existing agreements or the terms of our relationships with these clients change, it could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our clients are in a relatively consolidated industry and, as a result, a small number of our clients have accounted for a significant portion of our revenues. We expect that a limited number of our clients will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. The significant portion of our revenues that a limited number of our clients currently represent may increase in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2022, our five largest clients accounted for approximately 23% of our consolidated revenues.

Many of our relationships with these clients are long-standing and are important to our business and results of operations, but there is no guarantee that we will be able to retain or renew existing agreements or maintain our relationships on acceptable terms or at all. Additionally, we rely on cross-selling our products and services to our existing clients as a source of growth. The deterioration in or termination of any of these relationships could significantly reduce our revenues and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, we may be disproportionately affected by declining revenues from, or loss of, a significant client. In addition, by virtue of their significant relationships with us, these clients may be able to exert pressure on us with respect to the pricing of our services.

20

Table of Contents

The time and expense associated with switching from our competitors’ software and services to ours may limit our growth.

The costs for a mortgage lender or servicer to switch providers of software, data and analytics solutions and services can be significant and the process can take 12 to 18 months, or longer, to complete. As a result, potential clients may decide that it is not worth the time and expense to begin using our solutions and services, even if we offer competitive and economic advantages. If we are unable to convince these prospective clients to switch to our software and services, our ability to increase market share will be limited, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth.

We typically provide service level commitments under our client contracts, including commitments to provide high-quality technical support services. If we fail to meet these contractual commitments, it may adversely affect our reputation and relationship with our clients or we could face contract terminations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our client agreements typically provide service level commitments measured on a daily and monthly basis. If we are unable to meet the stated service level commitments or suffer extended periods of unavailability for our applications, we may be contractually obligated to provide these clients with service credits or refunds or we could face contract terminations. If we suffer unscheduled downtime that exceeds the allowed downtimes under our agreements with our clients or if we experience any extended service outages, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our sales process is highly dependent on our applications and business reputation and on positive recommendations from our existing clients. Any failure to maintain high-quality technical support, or a market perception that we do not maintain high-quality support, could adversely affect our reputation and our ability to sell our applications to existing and prospective clients, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our clients and we are subject to various governmental regulations, and a failure to comply with governmental regulations or changes in these regulations, including changes that may result from changes in the political landscape, could result in penalties, restrict or limit our or our clients’ operations or make it more burdensome to conduct such operations.

Many of our clients’ and our businesses are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could restrict our ability to provide certain services or result in imposition of civil fines and criminal penalties, substantial regulatory and compliance costs, litigation expense, adverse publicity and loss of revenues.

As a provider of electronic data processing to financial institutions, such as banks and credit unions, we are subject to regulatory oversight and examination by the FFIEC, the CFPB, the federal banking agencies and various other federal and state regulatory authorities. We also may be subject to possible review by state agencies that regulate banks in each state in which we conduct our electronic processing activities.

In addition, our businesses are subject to an increased degree of compliance oversight by regulators and by our clients. Specifically, the CFPB has authority to write rules affecting the business of, supervise, conduct examinations of and enforce compliance with federal consumer financial laws and regulations with respect to certain "non-depository covered persons" determined by the CFPB to be "larger participants" that offer consumer financial products and services. The CFPB and the prudential financial institution regulators, such as the OCC, also have the authority to examine us in our role as a service provider to large financial institutions. In addition, we believe some of our largest bank clients’ regulators are requiring the banks to exercise greater oversight and perform more rigorous audits of their key service providers such as us.

The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") and related regulations generally prohibit the payment or receipt of fees or any other item of value for the referral of real estate-related settlement services. RESPA also prohibits fee shares or splits or unearned fees in connection with the provision of residential real estate settlement services, such as

21

Table of Contents

mortgage brokerage and real estate brokerage. Notwithstanding these prohibitions, RESPA permits payments for goods furnished or for services actually performed, so long as those payments bear a reasonable relationship to the market value of the goods or services provided. RESPA and related regulations may to some extent restrict our real estate-related businesses from entering into certain preferred alliance arrangements. The CFPB is responsible for enforcing RESPA.

Changes to laws and regulations and regulatory oversight of our clients and us, including those that may result from changes in the political landscape, may cause us to increase our prices in certain situations or decrease our prices in other situations, may restrict our ability to implement price increases or otherwise limit the manner in which we conduct our business. We may also incur additional expense in keeping our software solutions services up to date as laws and regulations change, and we may not be able to pass those additional costs on to our clients. In addition, in response to increased regulatory oversight, participants in the mortgage lending industry may develop policies pursuant to which they limit the extent to which they can rely on any one vendor or service provider. Conversely, in an environment with less stringent regulatory oversight, prospective clients may choose to retain their in-house platforms, or current service providers, or seek alternative service providers who provide services that are less compliance and quality oriented at a lower price point. If we are unable to adapt our products and services to conform to increased or evolving laws and regulations, or if these laws and regulations have a negative effect on our clients, we may experience client losses or increased operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There may be consolidation in our end client market, which could reduce the use of our services by our clients.

Consolidation among existing or potential clients could reduce the number of our clients and potential clients. If our clients merge with, are acquired by or sell their servicing portfolios to other entities that are not our clients, or that use fewer of our services, they may discontinue or reduce their use of our services. In addition, if potential clients merge, our ability to increase our client base may be adversely affected and the ability of our clients to exert pressure on our pricing may increase. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Participants in the mortgage loan industry are subject to efforts by the government to regulate the mortgage loan industry or address the mortgage loan market and current economic environment.

The mortgage loan industry is heavily regulated and continues to be subject to review by governmental authorities. Inquiries may include federal and state governmental review of all aspects of the mortgage lending business. Such efforts may include actions to address the housing market and the economy in general and to maintain rigorous mortgage loan servicing standards.

Additional state and federal government actions directed at housing and the mortgage loan industry may occur and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our clients’ relationships with government-sponsored enterprises ("GSEs") are subject to change.

Our clients have significant relationships with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are GSEs tasked with working with financial institutions to provide liquidity to the mortgage loan market. The GSEs do this by purchasing loans from the lenders either for cash or in exchange for mortgage-backed securities that are backed by those loans and that, for a fee, carry the GSEs’ guarantee of timely payment of interest and principal to investors of those mortgage-backed securities. Because our clients service the loans owned by GSEs, we provide solutions and services for many of those loans. As a result of these relationships, GSEs have been able to implement changes to our pricing structure on certain products and services we provide. GSEs or other governmental agencies may be able to exert similar pressure on the pricing of our solutions and services in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to adapt our solutions to technological changes or evolving industry standards and regulations, or if our ongoing efforts to upgrade, modernize or innovate our technology are not successful, we may not be able to achieve our growth strategies and we could lose clients and have difficulty attracting new clients for our solutions.

22

Table of Contents

The markets for our solutions are characterized by constant technological changes, frequent introductions of new products and services and evolving industry standards and regulations. Our growth strategies and future success will be significantly affected by our ability to successfully enhance our current solutions, and to develop and introduce new solutions and services that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our clients and their customers. These initiatives carry the risks associated with any new product or service development effort, including cost overruns, delays in delivery and performance issues. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing, marketing and selling new solutions and services that meet these changing demands, that we will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of these solutions and services or that our new solutions and services and their enhancements will adequately meet the demands of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance. If our efforts are unsuccessful, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a competitive business environment and, if we are unable to compete effectively, it could have a material adverse effect on us.

The markets for our solutions are intensely competitive. Our competitors vary in size and in the scope and breadth of the services they offer. Some of our competitors have substantial resources. In addition, we expect that the markets in which we compete will continue to attract new competitors and new technologies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that competitive pressures we face in the markets in which we operate will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, because many of our larger existing or potential clients have historically developed their key processing applications in-house, and therefore, view their system requirements from a make-versus-buy perspective, we often compete against our existing or potential clients’ in-house capabilities. As a result, gaining new clients in our servicing and origination software businesses can be difficult. For banks and other potential clients, switching from an internally-designed system to an outside vendor, or from one vendor of servicing and origination software services to a new vendor, is a significant undertaking. These potential clients worry about possible disadvantages such as loss of custom functionality, increased costs and business disruption. As a result, these potential clients often resist change. There can be no assurance that our strategies for overcoming potential clients’ reluctance to change will be successful, and if we are unsuccessful, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

To the extent the availability of free or relatively inexpensive information increases, the demand for some of our data and information solutions may decrease.

Public sources of free or relatively inexpensive information have become increasingly available, particularly through the Internet, and this trend is expected to continue. Governmental agencies in particular have increased the amount of information to which they provide free public access. Public sources of free or relatively inexpensive information may reduce demand for, or the price that clients are willing to pay for, our data and information solutions. To the extent that clients choose not to obtain data and information from us and instead rely on information obtained at little or no cost from these public sources, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely upon proprietary technology and information rights, and if we are unable to protect our rights, it could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our success depends, in part, upon our intellectual property rights. We rely primarily on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademark laws, nondisclosure and other contractual restrictions on copying, distribution and creation of derivative products to protect our proprietary technology and information. This protection is limited, and our intellectual property could be used by others without our consent. In addition, patents may not be issued with respect to our pending or future patent applications, and our patents may not be upheld as valid or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Any infringement, disclosure, loss, invalidity of or failure to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, litigation may be necessary to enforce or protect our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could be time-consuming, result in substantial costs

23

Table of Contents

and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our applications, solutions, including those that contain "open source" software, or services are found to infringe the proprietary rights of others or fail to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses, we may be required to change our business practices and may also become subject to significant costs and monetary penalties.

We use a limited amount of software licensed by its authors or other third parties under so-called “open source” licenses and may continue to use such software in the future. Some of these licenses contain requirements that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon the open source software, and that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of a particular open source license or other license granting third parties certain rights of further use. By the terms of certain open source licenses, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software if we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a certain manner. Additionally, the terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by the United States or other courts, and there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our solutions. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on origin of the software. We cannot be sure that all open source software is submitted for approval prior to use in our solutions. In addition, many of the risks associated with using open source software cannot be eliminated, and could, if not properly addressed, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As our information technology applications and services develop, we may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. Any such claims, whether with or without merit, could:

·be expensive and time-consuming to defend;Kirk T. Larsen, our Chief Financial Officer assumed the additional role of President.
cause us to cease providing solutions that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
require us to redesign our solutions, if feasible;
divert management’s attention and resources; and
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary technologies.

Any one or more of the foregoing outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally,

Merger with ICE

As we may be liable for damages for past infringement if a court determines that our software or technologies infringe upon a third party’s patent or other proprietary rights.

We depend on our ability to access data from external sources to maintain and grow our businesses. If we are unable to access needed data from these sources or if the prices charged for these services increase, the quality, pricing and availability of our solutions may be adversely affected.

We rely extensively upon data from a variety of external sources to maintain our proprietary and non-proprietary databases, including data from third-party suppliers, various government and public record sources and data contributed by our clients. Our data sources could cease providing or reduce the availability of their data to us, increase the price we pay for their data or limit our use of their data for a variety of reasons, including legislatively or judicially imposed restrictions on use. If a number of suppliers are no longer able or are unwilling to provide us with certain data, or if our public record sources of data become unavailable or too expensive, we may need to find alternative sources. If we are unable to identify and contract with suitable alternative data suppliers and efficiently and effectively integrate these data sources into our service offerings, we could experience service disruptions, increased costs and reduced quality of our services. Moreover, some of our data suppliers compete with us in certain product offerings, which may make us vulnerable to unpredictable price increases from them. Significant price increases could require us to seek other sources of data on more favorable economic terms, which may not be available at all. Loss of such access or the availability of data in the future on commercially reasonable terms or at all may reduce the quality and availability of our services and solutions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

24

Table of Contents

Our international operations and third-party service providers subject us to additional risks.

We have sought to reduce our costs by utilizing lower-cost labor outside the United States. Our international operations are based solely in India with approximately 1,800 employees. In addition, we have limited engagements with off-shore third-party service providers. Other countries may be subject to higher degrees of political and social instability than the United States and may lack the infrastructure to withstand political unrest, natural disasters or pandemics. Such disruptions, including supply chain disruptions, can affect our ability to deliver our solutions on a timely basis, if at all, and to a lesser extent can decrease efficiency and increase our costs. Weakness of the U.S. dollar in relation to the currency used and higher inflation rates experienced in other countries may also reduce anticipated savings. Furthermore, the practice of utilizing labor based in foreign countries has come under increased scrutiny in the United States and, as a result, many of our clients may require us to use labor based in the United States. We may not be able to pass on the increased costs of higher-priced United States-based labor to our clients, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, other countries could adopt new legislation or regulations that could make it difficult, more costly or impossible for us to continue our foreign activities as currently being conducted. In addition, in many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") or other local anti-corruption laws. Any violations of FCPA or local anti-corruption laws by us or our subsidiaries, could result in substantial financial and other penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience system failures or service interruptions that could harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability.

We depend heavily upon the computer systems and our existing technology infrastructure locateddiscussed in our data centers. Certain system interruptions or events beyond our control could interrupt or terminate the delivery of our solutions and services to our clients and may interfere with our suppliers’ ability to provide necessary data to us and our employees’ ability to perform their responsibilities.

These potential interruptions include, but are not limited to, damage or interruption from hurricanes, floods, fires, power losses, telecommunications outages, cyber-based attacks, ransomware attacks, terrorist attacks, acts of war, human errors and similar events. Our corporate offices and one of our data centers are located in Jacksonville, Florida, which is an area that is at high risk of hurricane and flood damage. Climate change is believed to be linked to severe weather events across the country and the potential for increases in the frequency or intensity of such events. In addition, acts of terrorism, which may be targeted at metropolitan areas that have higher population density than rural areas, could cause disruptions in our business or the economy as a whole. The servers that we use through various third-party service providers may also be vulnerable to similar disruptions, which could lead to interruptions, delays and loss of critical data. Such service providers may not have sufficient protection or recovery plans in certain circumstances, and our insurance may not be sufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur.

Defects in our software solutions, errors or delays in the processing of electronic transactions, or other difficulties could result in:

interruption of business operations;
delay in market acceptance;
us, or our clients, missing a regulatory deadline;
additional development and remediation costs;
diversion of technical and other resources;
loss of clients;
negative publicity; or
exposure to liability claims.

25

Table of Contents

Any one or more of the foregoing occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability through disclaimers and limitation-of-liability provisions in our client agreements, we cannot be certain that these measures will be successful in limiting our liability.

We may experience delays or difficulty in developing or implementing new, enhanced or existing software, data or hosting solutions, which may negatively affect our relationships with existing and potential clients, reduce or delay the generation of revenues or increase development and implementation costs.

Our future financial performance depends upon the successful development, implementation and client acceptance of new, existing and enhanced versions of our software and hosting solutions. We continually seek to develop enhancements to our solutions, including updates in response to changes in applicable laws, as well as new offerings to supplement our existing solutions. As a result, we are subject to the risks inherent in the development and integration of new technologies, including defects or undetected errors in our software solutions, difficulties in installing or integrating our technologies on platforms used by our clients or other unanticipated performance, stability and compatibility problems. Any of these problems could result in material delays in the introduction or acceptance of our solutions, increased costs, decreased client satisfaction, breach of contract claims, harm to our industry reputation and reduced or delayed revenues. If we are unable to implement existing solutions or deliver new solutions or upgrades or other enhancements to our existing solutions on a timely and cost-effective basis, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, as a significant focus of our sales efforts is on the top U.S. mortgage loan originators and servicers, larger clients may demand more complex integration, implementation services and features, which may result in implementations that take longer than we forecast or delays in these clients using our solutions. Furthermore, if implementations take longer than planned or these clients delay their use of our solutions, we may be required to delay revenue recognition on some of these transactions until the technical or implementation requirements have been met, and we may not generate revenues from these clients as quickly as we had forecast.

Because our revenues from clients in the mortgage lending industry are affected by the strength of the economy and the housing market generally, including the effect of interest rates, levels of inflation and the volume of real estate transactions, a change in any of these conditions could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our revenues are primarily generated from software and hosting solutions, professional services and data solutions we provide to the mortgage loan industry and, as a result, a weak economy or housing market may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The volume of mortgage loan origination and residential real estate transactions is highly variable and reductions in these transaction volumes could have a direct effect on the revenues we generate from our software solutions business and some of our data and analytics businesses.

The revenues we generate from our servicing software solutions primarily depend upon the total number of mortgage loans processed on MSP®, which tends to be comparatively consistent regardless of economic conditions. However, in the event that a difficult economy or other factors lead to a decline in levels of home ownership and a reduction in the number of mortgage loans outstanding and we are not able to counter the effect of those events with increased market share or higher fees, our MSP® revenues could be adversely affected.

In addition, some of our origination software solutions are exposed to variances in origination volumes, primarily related to refinance volumes due to the nature of the services provided. Our data and analytics solutions that are more sensitive to fluctuations in home buying activity and origination volumes primarily relate to services where we provide data necessary for tax data and other settlement service activities. Given the current interest rate environment and high levels of inflation, we have seen lower origination volumes as well as certain adverse effects on the performance and financial condition of some of our clients, which have had an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The recent sharp decline in origination volumes has led some clients to reduce the size of their mortgage loan workforce, exit certain mortgage operations or go out of business. Such conditions may continue and result in increased negative economic conditions, increased unemployment or a prolonged downturn in other general economic factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

26

Table of Contents

A weaker economy and housing market tend to increase the volume of consumer mortgage loan defaults, which can increase revenues from our applications focused on supporting default management functions. However, government regulation of the mortgage loan industry in general, and the default and foreclosure process in particular, has greatly slowed the processing of defaulted mortgage loans and has changed the way many of our clients address mortgage loans in default. A downturn in the origination market and a concurrent slowdown or change in the way mortgage loans in default are addressed could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may fail to attract and retain enough qualified employees, including those with client relationships or support our technology and operations, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to expand our business and service our clients.

Our business relies on large numbers of skilled employees, and our success depends on our ability to attract, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees. There has been more competition for talent, wage inflation, benefit offerings and higher levels of workforce mobility. If our attrition rate increases, our operating efficiency and productivity may decrease. We will need to increase our hiring and will incur additional expenses related to retention if we are not able to maintain our attrition rate through our current recruiting and retention policies. We compete for employees not only with other companies in our industry but also with companies in other industries, such as software services, engineering services and financial services companies, and there is a limited pool of employees who have the client relationships, skills and training needed to do our work. If our business continues to grow, the number of people we will need to hire may increase. Increased competition for employees could have a material adverse effect on our ability to expand our business and service our clients, as well as cause us to incur greater personnel expenses and training costs.

The extent to which health epidemics affect our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict.

Our business and operations could be adversely affected by health epidemics impacting the industries and communities in which we and our clients, suppliers and business partners operate. Such epidemics may result in authorities taking various steps to mitigate anticipated health and/or economic effects, but there can be no assurance that such steps will be effective or achieve their desired results in a timely fashion. We may experience financial impacts that are difficult to foresee or measure.

The spread of epidemics may cause us to modify our business practices, including restricting employee travel, developing social distancing plans for our employees and limiting physical participation in meetings, events and conferences, and we may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or as we determine are in the best interests of our employees, clients and business partners. We will be unable to predict the extent to which we will need to continue these practices or further modify our business practices to address future surges and variants. There is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by the epidemic or will otherwise be satisfactory to government authorities. The effects could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations even after the epidemic has subsided.

Risks Related to Our Investment in DNB

Our investment in DNB may expose us to certain risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2022, we owned approximately 18.5 million shares of DNB common stock for an ownership interest of approximately 4% of DNB’s common stock and the after-tax fair value of our investment was $211.0 million based on DNB’s closing stock price of $12.26 on December 31, 2022 and assuming a statutory tax rate of 25.5%. Market volatility or further decline in DNB’s stock price may result in us not realizing our expected return on investment, or a negative return on investment. Refer to Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our investment in DNB.

27

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Cybersecurity and Data Privacy

If we are unable to protect our information systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches, including breaches involving third-party vendors, or if we are unable to provide adequate security in the electronic transmission of sensitive data, it could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are highly dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to securely process, transmit and store electronic information. Security breaches of this infrastructure, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers and similar breaches, and the evolving threat landscape can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information, consumer data and proprietary business information. Cyber-based attacks, including ransomware attacks to extort payment in return for the release of sensitive information, are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Unauthorized access, including through use of fraudulent schemes such as "phishing" schemes, could jeopardize the security of information stored in our systems. In addition, malware or viruses could jeopardize the security of information stored or used in a user’s computer and other personal devices. If we are unable to prevent or detect such security or privacy breaches or our third-party vendors are unable to prevent or detect such breaches, our operations could be disrupted, or we may suffer loss of reputation, financial loss, lawsuits and regulatory-imposed restrictions and penalties because of lost or misappropriated information, including sensitive consumer data, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, our clients are increasingly imposing more stringent contractual obligations on us relating to our information security protections. If we are unable to maintain protections and processes at a level commensurate with that required by our large clients, it could negatively affect our relationships with those clients, increase our operating or litigation costs or subject us to liability under those contractual obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our policies and procedures, including those related to cybersecurity, may prove inadequate for the risks we face.

We have devoted significant resources to develop our policies and procedures, including those related to cybersecurity, and expect to continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, our strategies may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, including risks that are unidentified or unanticipated. If our solutions change and as the markets in which we operate evolve, our strategies may not always adapt to such changes. Some of our methods of managing risk are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior and management’s judgment. Other of our methods of managing risk depend on the evaluation of information regarding markets, customers, catastrophe occurrence or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to us. This information may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. As a result, these methods may not predict future risk exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures or available information indicate. In addition, management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record and verify large numbers of transactions and events, which may not be fully effective. While we employ a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques, those techniques and the judgments that accompany their application cannot anticipate every economic and financial outcome or the timing of such outcomes. If our efforts are ineffective, we could suffer losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we could be subject to litigation, particularly from our clients, and sanctions or fines from regulators.

Regulatory developments with respect to use of consumer data and public records could have a material adverse effect on us.

Because our databases include certain public and non-public personal information concerning consumers, we are subject to government regulation and potential adverse publicity concerning our use of consumer data. We acquire, store, use and provide many types of consumer data and related services that are subject to regulation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act and, to a lesser extent, various other federal, state and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are designed to protect the privacy of consumers and to prevent security breaches, cyber-based attacks, other unauthorized access and misuse of personal information in the marketplace. Our failure to comply with these laws, or any future laws or regulations of a similar nature, could result in

28

Table of Contents

substantial regulatory penalties, litigation expense and loss of revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, some of our data suppliers face similar regulatory requirements and, consequently, they may cease to be able to provide data to us or may substantially increase the fees they charge us for this data, which may make it financially burdensome or impossible for us to acquire data that is necessary to offer our products and services. Further, many consumer advocates, privacy advocates and government regulators believe that existing laws and regulations do not adequately protect privacy or ensure the accuracy of consumer-related data.

As a result, multiple consumer privacy laws have been implemented at the state level which regulate the acquisition, dissemination, and commercial use of personal information. These consumer privacy laws include the CCPA, as modified by the CPRA; the VCDPA; the CPA; the CTDPA; and the UCPA.  Generally, these laws seek to implement further regulations on the acquisition, dissemination, and commercial use of personal information and also contemplate requirements relative to data accuracy, the ability of consumers to opt out of certain processing of personal information, the right to access personal information and to obtain a copy, and the right to delete personal information in certain circumstances. These laws are directly applicable to our clients as well as to us in certain circumstances and are applicable to us in a reduced capacity when we act as service providers to our clients.  

Laws such as the Vermont Data Broker Law also place restrictions and requirements on the use of publicly available data, and laws such as the NY DFS Cybersecurity Regulation provide for certain security requirements surrounding the collection and maintenance of certain business and consumer nonpublic personal information. Complying with varying jurisdictional requirements could increase the cost and complexity of compliance. Any future laws, regulations or other restrictions limiting the dissemination or use of personal information may reduce the quality and availability of our solutions and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, violations of privacy laws can result in significant penalties and damage to our brand and business.

Our reliance on third parties subjects us to risk and may disrupt or adversely affect our operations. In addition, we may not realize the full benefit of our third-party arrangements, which may result in increased costs, or may adversely affect the service levels we are able to provide our clients.

We rely upon third parties for various business process and technology-related products and services, including cloud providers and cloud hosted software solutions. Although we have contractual provisions with our providers that specify performance requirements, we do not ultimately control their performance, which may make our operations vulnerable to their performance failures and supply chain constraints. In addition, our failure to adequately monitor and regulate the performance of our third-party vendors could subject us to additional risk. Reliance on third parties also makes us vulnerable to changes in our vendors’ businesses, including price increases related to the current levels of inflation, financial condition and other matters outside of our control, including their violations of laws or regulations, which could increase our exposure to liability or otherwise increase the costs associated with the operation of our business. If for any reason our relationship with any of these third parties, including cloud-based providers, were to end unexpectedly, it could require a significant amount of cost and time to transition to new third-party service providers. The failure of our providers to perform as expected or as contractually required could result in significant disruptions and costs to our operations and to the services we provide to our clients, or could result in loss of revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risk Related to Our Structure

Certain executive officers and members of our Board of Directors have interests and positions that could present potential conflicts.

Certain executive officers and members of our Board of Directors serve on the Board of Directors of other entities or are employed by other entities. As a result of the foregoing, there may be circumstances where such persons may be subject to conflicts of interest with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting us.

29

Table of Contents

We have in place a code of business conduct and ethics prescribing procedures for managing conflicts of interest and our chief compliance officer and audit committee are responsible for the review, approval or ratification of any potential conflicts of interest transactions. Additionally, we expect that interested directors will abstain from decisions with respect to conflicts of interest as a matter of practice. However, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective, that we will be able to resolve all potential conflicts or that the resolution of any such conflicts will be no less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated third party.

Refer to Note 6 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our related party relationships and transactions.

We are restricted from pursuing certain potential business opportunities under a non-competition agreement.

In connection with the Distribution, we entered into a non-competition agreement with FNF pursuant to which we agreed to certain restrictions on the scope of the business that we may conduct for the 10-year period following the Distribution, including that we are prohibited from (i) engaging in title generation/escrow services, appraisal or default and field services work (other than technology solutions for such settlement services) without the prior written consent of FNF (subject to an exception allowing us to acquire a business engaged in such restricted services if at least 90% of such business’ revenues is contributed by activities other than such restricted services) and (ii) engaging in certain transactions, such as a merger, sale of assets or sale of greater than 5% of its equity interests, with a buyer that derives 10% or more of its revenues from such restricted services. Although we do not presently engage in any of these restricted services and our current business is not restricted, as a result of these restrictions, we may have to forgo certain transactions that might have otherwise been advantageous in compliance with our obligations under the non-competition agreement.

In particular, the restriction on engaging in a merger, sale of assets or sale of greater than 5% of its equity interests with a buyer that derives 10% or more of its revenues from restricted services may discourage a third party engaged in such restricted services from pursuing such a transaction with us during the 10-year period following the Distribution.

General Risk Factors

If we are unable to successfully consummate acquisitions or experience delays in integrating acquisitions, it could have a material adverse effect on us.

One of our strategies to grow our business is to opportunistically acquire complementary businesses, technologies and services. This strategy will depend on our ability to find suitable acquisitions and may depend on financing them on acceptable terms. We may require additional debt or equity financing for future acquisitions and doing so may be made more difficult by our indebtedness. Raising additional capital for acquisitions through debt financing could result in increased interest expense and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional capital for acquisitions through equity financing, the ownership interests of existing shareholders will be diluted.

If we are unable to acquire suitable acquisition candidates, we may experience slower growth. Further, we may face challenges in integrating any acquired business. These challenges may include eliminating redundant operations, facilities and systems, coordinating management and personnel, retaining key employees, managing different corporate cultures, integrating relationships with clients, vendors and business partners while achieving revenue synergies, cost reductions and cross-selling opportunities. Acquisitions involve numerous operational, strategic, financial, accounting, legal, tax and other risks, including potential liabilities associated with acquired businesses. Difficulties in integrating acquisitions and our ability to manage the combined company may result in the combined company performing differently than expected, in operational challenges or in the delay or failure to realize anticipated revenue synergies and cost-related efficiencies and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Additionally, the acquisition and integration processes may disrupt our business and divert management attention and our resources. If we fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses, products, technologies and personnel, it could impair relationships with employees, clients and strategic partners, distract management attention from our core businesses, result in control failures and otherwise disrupt our ongoing business, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our

30

Table of Contents

business, financial condition and results of operations. The anticipated benefits and cost savings of an acquisition may not be realized fully or at all, may take longer to realize than expected or could have other adverse effects that we do not currently foresee. In addition, we may be required to record future charges for impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from such acquisitions.

We have substantial investments in recorded goodwill and other intangible assets, and an extended economic downturn or troubled mortgage market could cause these investments to become impaired.

Goodwill and other intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Factors that may indicate the carrying value of our intangible assets, including goodwill, may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future results of operations, a significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization, and negative industry or economic trends. However, if there is an extended economic downturn in the future, the carrying amount of our goodwill or other intangible assets may no longer be recoverable, and we may be required to record an impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our indebtedness could have a negative effect on our financing options and liquidity position, and certain of our financing arrangements subject us to various restrictions that could limit our operating flexibility.

As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately $2.7 billion of total debt outstanding.

Our indebtedness could have important consequences to us, including:

requiring us to use a portion of the money we earn to pay principal and interest on our debt, which could reduce the amount of money available to finance operations, acquisitions and other business activities;
exposing us to costs and risks associated with agreements limiting our exposure to higher interest rates, as such agreements may not offer complete protection from these risks, and subjecting us to the risk that one or more of the counterparties to these agreements may fail to satisfy their obligations under such agreements;
limiting our flexibility in planning for or responding to changing business and economic conditions, including increased competition, by causing us to have difficulty borrowing money in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes and possibly limiting our ability to pursue other business opportunities and implement certain business strategies;
imposing operating and financial restrictions on our activities, including compliance with, or maintenance of, certain financial tests and ratios, including a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio, and limit or prohibit our ability to, among other things, take advantage of financing, mergers and acquisitions and other corporate opportunities; and
exposing us to possible losses in connection with our interest rate swaps that are indexed in LIBOR as result of proposed changes to LIBOR reporting practices or the pending replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on or refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and holders of our outstanding debt could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. Risks associated with our indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

31

Table of Contents

Our senior leadership team is critical to our continued success, and the loss of such personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our future success substantially depends on the continued service and performance of the members of our senior leadership team. These personnel possess business and technical capabilities that are difficult to replace. We have attempted to mitigate this risk by entering into long-term (two to three year) employment contracts with the members of our senior leadership team and providing long-term incentive compensation with multi-year vesting provisions. If we lose key members of our senior leadership team, we may not be able to effectively manage our current operations or meet ongoing and future business challenges, and this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Current and future litigation, investigations or other actions against us could be costly and time consuming to defend.

We are from time to time subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, such as claims brought by our clients in connection with commercial disputes and employment claims made by our current or former employees.

On November 5, 2019, Black Knight Servicing Technologies, LLC (“BKST”), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Black Knight,Form 10-K, filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (the “Black Knight Complaint”) against PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (“PennyMac”). Shortly after the filing of the Black Knight Complaint, on November 6, 2019, PennyMac filed an Antitrust Complaint (the “PennyMac Complaint”) against Black Knight. Refer to Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to the PennyMac litigation matter.

Litigation can result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, we also receive requests for information from various state and federal regulatory authorities, some of which take the form of civil investigative demands or subpoenas. Some of these regulatory inquiries may result in the assessment of fines for violations of regulations or settlements with such authorities requiring a variety of remedies.

There can be no assurance that we will not incur additional material costs and expenses in connection with any potential future investigations or claims, including but not limited to fines or penalties and legal costs, or be subject to other remedies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Insurance may not cover or be sufficient for such investigations and claims and may not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. An investigation or claim brought against us that is uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated costs, management distraction or reputational harm, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our charter and bylaws and provisions of Delaware law may discourage or prevent strategic transactions, including a takeover of our company, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our shareholders.

Provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL") could delay or prevent us from entering into a strategic transaction with a third party, as applicable, even if such a transaction would benefit our shareholders. For example, our charter and bylaws:

authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that could be issued by us upon approval of our Board of Directors to increase the number of outstanding shares of capital stock, making a takeover more difficult and expensive;
provide that directors elected prior to 2020 may be removed from office only for cause and that any vacancy on our Board of Directors may only be filled by a majority of our directors then in office, which may make it difficult for other shareholders to reconstitute our Board of Directors;
provide that special meetings of the shareholders may be called only upon the request of a majority of our Board of Directors or by the chairman of the Board of Directors or our chief executive officer; and
require advance notice to be given by shareholders for any shareholder proposals or director nominees.

32

Table of Contents

By virtue of not opting out of Section 203 of the DGCL in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we are subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, which prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of three years after the time the shareholder became an interested stockholder, subject to certain exceptions, including if, prior to such time, the board of directors approved the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested stockholder. "Business combinations" include mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the "interested stockholder." Subject to various exceptions, an "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with his or her affiliates and associates, owns or within three years did own 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock. These restrictions generally prohibit or delay the accomplishment of mergers or other takeover or change of control attempts that are not approved by a company’s Board of Directors.

These restrictions and provisions could keep us from pursuing relationships with strategic partners and from raising additional capital, which could impede our ability to expand our business and strengthen our competitive position. These restrictions could also limit shareholder value by impeding a sale of us.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price at which your shares were acquired. Those fluctuations could be based on various factors, including those described above and the following:

the Merger Agreement may be terminated, the ICE Transaction may not be completed or regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated;
fluctuations in the market price of ICE’s common stock;
our operating performance and the performance of our competitors and fluctuations in our operating results;
the public’s reaction to our press releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by research analysts who follow us or other companies in our industry;
global, national or local economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance;
announcements of positive news by us or our competitors, such as announcements of new products, services, strategic investments or acquisitions;
announcements of negative news by us or our competitors, such as announcements of poorer than expected results of operations, data breaches or significant litigation;
actual or anticipated variations in our or our competitors’ operating results, and our and our competitors’ growth rates;
failure by us or our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance we or our competitors may give the market;
changes in laws or regulations, or new interpretations or applications of laws and regulations, that are applicable to our business;
the arrival or departure of key personnel;
the number of shares publicly traded;
future sales or issuances of our common stock, including sales, distributions or issuances by us, our officers or directors and our significant shareholders; and
other developments affecting us, our industry or our competitors.

In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions or interest rate changes, may cause declines in the market price of our common stock, and you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment.

33

Table of Contents

As we primarily operate in a single industry, we are especially vulnerable to these factors to the extent that they affect our industry or our products. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources and could also require us to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments or to settle litigation.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We may retain future earnings, if any, for future operations, expansion and debt repayment. We have not paid cash dividends to date and have no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. As a result of our current dividend policy, you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it. Any future determination to declare and pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Item 1B.           Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.           Properties

Our corporate headquarters is located in Jacksonville, Florida in an office building that we own. In addition, we own or lease other office space, data centers and other facilities in the United States and India.

Item 3.           Legal Proceedings

For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3.

Item 4.           Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

34

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.           Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Shares of our common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and trade under the symbol "BKI".

On January 31, 2023, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $60.59 per share. We had 5,877 holders of record of our common stock as of January 31, 2023. The actual number of shareholders is greater than this number of record holders, and includes shareholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year, we intend to file with the SEC a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which will include information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans and other matters required by Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this Report.

Performance Graph

The following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return for our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P North American Technology Sector Index from December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2022. The data for the S&P 500 Index and the S&P North American Technology Sector Index assumes reinvestment of dividends. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100, and the cumulative returns are based on the market price as of each year-end. Note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Graphic

*$100 invested on December 31, 2017 in Black Knight or each respective index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Copyright© 2022 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.

December 31,

    

2018

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

Black Knight

$

102

$

146

$

200

$

188

$

140

S&P 500 Index

$

96

$

126

$

149

$

192

$

157

S&P North American Technology Sector Index

$

103

$

147

$

213

$

269

$

174

35

Table of Contents

Item 6.            [Reserved]

Item 7.            Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The statements in the discussion and analysis regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding the performance of our business, our liquidity and capital resources and the other non-historical statements are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in "Risk Factors" and "Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information." Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by the forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with the sections entitled "Risk Factors," "Selected Historical Financial Data," "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to "Black Knight," the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" are to Black Knight, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries ("BKI").

Overview

Black Knight is a premier provider of integrated, innovative, mission-critical, high-performance software solutions, data and analytics to the U.S. mortgage and real estate markets. Our mission is to transform the markets we serve by delivering innovative solutions that are integrated across the homeownership lifecycle and that result in realized efficiencies, reduced risk and new opportunities for our clients to help them achieve greater levels of success.

We believe our clients leverage our robust, integrated solutions across the entire homeownership lifecycle to help retain existing customers, gain new customers, mitigate risk and operate more efficiently. Our clients rely on our proven, comprehensive and scalable solutions and our unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional client support to achieve their strategic goals and better serve their customers.

We have a focused strategy of continuous innovation across our business, which is supported by acquisitions, and even more importantly, the integration of those acquisitions and our innovations into our broader ecosystem. Our ability to effectively manage our business and maintain a strong client base allows us to continually invest in our business, both to meet ever-changing industry requirements and to maintain our position as a leading provider of platforms for the mortgage and real estate markets.

Deep business and regulatory expertise along with a holistic view of the markets we serve allow us the privilege of being a trusted advisor to our clients, who range from the nation’s largest lenders and mortgage servicers to institutional portfolio managers and government entities, to individual real estate agents and mortgage brokers. Clients leverage our software ecosystem across a range of real estate and housing finance verticals through multiple digital channels, using our offerings to drive more business, reduce risk and deliver a best-in-class customer experience, all while operating more efficiently and cost-effectively.

We have long-standing relationships with our clients, a majority of whom enter into long-term contracts that include multiple, integrated products embedded into mission-critical processes. This speaks to the confidence our clients have in our solutions and our commitment to serve them. The contractual nature of our revenues and our client relationships make our revenues both highly visible and recurring in nature. Our scale and integrated ecosystem of solutions drive significant operating leverage and cross-sell opportunities, enabling our clients to continually benefit from new and greater operational efficiencies.

Our Markets

The Black Knight ecosystem stretches across four core “pillar” verticals: mortgage loan servicing, mortgage loan origination, real estate and capital markets; with our data and analytics flowing throughout the interconnected ecosystem of solutions. As we integrate our innovations and acquired technologies, we are committed to continually improving the

36

Table of Contents

end consumer experience, driving further efficiencies for our clients and helping them to win new customers and retain existing customers.

Recent Developments

Optimal Blue Transaction

On February 15, 2022, we entered into a purchase agreement with Cannae Holdings, LLC (“Cannae”) and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (“THL”) and acquired all of their Class A units of Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC (“Optimal Blue Holdco”), in exchange for aggregate consideration of 36.4 million shares of Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (“DNB”) common stock valued at $722.5 million and $433.5 million in cash. The cash portion of the consideration was funded with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The aggregate consideration of $1.156 billion and number of shares of DNB common stock paid to Cannae and THL was based on the 20-day volume-weighted average trading price of DNB for the period ended on February 14, 2022. Since February 15, 2022, we own 100% of the Class A units of Optimal Blue Holdco. Refer to Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Merger Agreement

On28, 2023, on May 4, 2022, we entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”(ICE), (the Merger Agreement) a leading global provider of data, technology, and market infrastructure, in a transaction valued at approximately $13.1 billion, or $85 per share, based on ICE’s 10-day volume weighted average price as of May 2, 2022 of $118.09, with consideration in the form of a mix of cash (80%) and stock (20%) (the “ICE Transaction”ICE Merger). The aggregate cashOn March 7, 2023, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Merger Agreement (the Amendment), which provides for, among other things, a reduction in the merger consideration to $75.00 per share, with consideration in the ICE Transaction consistsform of a mix of approximately $10.5 billion$68.00 per share in cash and the aggregate stock consideration was valued at approximately $2.6 billionwith an exchange ratio of 0.0682 based on ICE’s 10-day volume weighted average priceVWAP as of May 2,March 3, 2023 of $102.62. In connection with the Amendment, ICE has also committed to litigate with the Federal Trade Commission, if necessary, to obtain approval of the ICE Merger. In connection with the ICE Merger and pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, our compensation committee approved certain compensation decisions, including with respect to severance arrangements and compensation adjustments, as discussed further below.

8

Executive Summary

Our Company had a solid year in 2022, despite a very challenging time for the markets we serve. A rapid rise in interest rates caused operational challenges for our clients and prospects and a heightened focus on expenses by clients and prospects as well as the proposed ICE Merger have elongated the sales cycle in the short term. Market conditions have also resulted in elevated originator consolidation and bankruptcies, resulting in associated client attrition. In the face of $118.09.that challenging market backdrop, our team remained focused and continued to execute against our strategic initiatives to deliver profitable growth over the long term.

Our financial results for 2022 demonstrated our high recurring revenue business model and resilience in a challenging market environment. While the operating environment has created some near-term headwinds to our financial performance, we remain positive about our long-term growth opportunities and are committed to creating value for all of our stakeholders.

Our sales results for 2022 reflect the value that lenders, servicers and other market participants see in our solutions. To that end, we signed 13 new MSP® loan servicing system clients, 29 new Empower® loan origination system (LOS) clients or additional channels to existing clients, and 129 new Optimal BlueSM product, pricing and eligibility (PPE) engine clients. We also had continued success in cross-selling solutions to our existing clients.

Recognizing the strategic importance of our acquisition of Optimal Blue, we completed the acquisition of the minority interests of Optimal Blue that were previously held by Cannae Holdings, Inc. (Cannae) and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (THL) on February 15, 2022. The ICE Transaction is expectedtransaction had a positive impact on our 2022 Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and simplified our organizational structure with Optimal Blue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Black Knight.

Looking ahead to close2023, we will continue to act with focus and urgency to execute on our long-term strategic initiatives to drive growth by signing new clients, cross-selling to existing clients and delivering innovative solutions.

9

Financial Highlights

* In 2022, the effect of our investment in DNB was an increase in Net earnings attributable to Black Knight of $306.7 million, or $1.97 per diluted share, including a gain of $305.4 million, net of tax, or $1.96 per diluted share, recognized in the first halfquarter of 2023, subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The ICE Transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of Black Knight and ICE, and Black Knight shareholders. Refer to Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

TitlePoint Transaction

On November 18, 2022 we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our TitlePoint line of business (“TitlePoint”) within our Data and Analytics reporting segment to an affiliate of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“FNF”) for $225 million in cash, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The TitlePoint transaction closed on January 1, 2023. Refer to Note 2 to the Notes of Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, Revenues, Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Operating income related to our TitlePoint line of business before intercompany allocated revenue and expenses were approximately $39 million, $24 million and $22 million, respectively.

Business Trends and Conditions

Market Trends

Market trends that have spurred lenders and servicers to seek software, data and analytics solutions are as follows:

Lenders increasingly focused on core operations. As a result of a decline in origination volumes and the increasing cost to originate a mortgage loan, we believe lenders have become more focused on their core operations, including ways to reduce or eliminate certain costs. According to the MBA Quarterly Performance Report as of November 21, 2022, the cost to originate a loan has more than doubled since 2008 and increased 22% in 2022 compared to 2021. We believe lenders are increasingly shifting from in-house solutions to third-party solutions that provide a more comprehensive and efficient solution. Lenders require these providers to deliver best-in-class solutions and deep domain expertise and to assist them in maintaining regulatory compliance.

37

Table of Contents

Integral role of technology in the U.S. mortgage market. Over the past decade, homebuyers’ processes have become more digital, and banks and other lenders and servicers have become increasingly focused on automation and workflow management to operate more efficiently and meet their regulatory requirements as well as using technology to enhance the consumer experience during the mortgage loan origination, closing, and servicing processes. Technology providers must be able to support the complexity and dynamic nature of the market, display extensive industry knowledge and possess the financial resources to make the necessary investments in technology and software to support lenders and servicers. This includes an enhanced digital experience along with the application of artificial intelligence, robotic process automation and adaptive learning.

Heightened demand for enhanced transparency and analytic insight. As the U.S. mortgage loan market participants work to minimize risk in lending, servicing and capital markets, they rely on the integration of data and analytics with solutions that enhance the decision-making process. These industry participants are eager for timely data and insights to help them plan and react to the changing environment.

Regulatory changes and oversight. Most U.S. mortgage loan market participants are subject to a high level of regulatory oversight and regulatory requirements as federal and state governments have enacted various new laws, rules and regulations. It is our experience that mortgage lenders and servicers have become more focused on minimizing the risk of non-compliance with regulatory requirements and look for solutions that assist them in complying with their regulatory requirements. We expect this trend to continue as additional governmental programs and regulations have been enacted to address the economic concerns resulting from the pandemic, and our clients have had to adapt their systems and processes in record time to the shifting landscape. In addition, our clients and our clients’ regulators have elevated their focus on privacy and data security in light of an increased level of cybersecurity incidents. We expect the industry focus on privacy and data security to continue to increase.

Our Business Segments

Our business is organized into two segments: Software Solutions and Data and Analytics.

Software Solutions

Our Software Solutions segment offers software solutions that support loan servicing, loan origination and settlement services. Our software solutions revenues were 86%, 85% and 84% of our consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The following table summarizes our software solutions revenues (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31, 

% of Segment Revenues

2022

    

2021

    

2020

    

2022

2021

2020

Servicing software solutions

$

883.8

$

838.9

$

777.7

 

66

%  

67

%

75

%

Origination software solutions

 

450.1

 

411.1

 

262.5

 

34

%  

33

%

25

%

Software Solutions

$

1,333.9

$

1,250.0

$

1,040.2

 

100

%  

100

%

100

%

Our servicing software solutions primarily include our core servicing software solution that automates loan servicing, including loan setup and ongoing processing, customer service, accounting, reporting to the secondary mortgage market and investors and web-based workflow information systems. Our servicing software solutions primarily generate revenues based on the number of active loans outstanding on our system, which has been very stable; however, we also generate revenues from foreclosure and bankruptcy volumes, which can fluctuate based on economic cycles and other factors.

38

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes active first and second lien mortgage loans on our mortgage loan servicing software solution and the related market data, reflecting our leadership in the mortgage loan servicing software solutions market (in millions):

First lien

Second lien

Total first and second lien

as of December 31, 

as of December 31, 

as of December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

    

2022

    

2021

2020

Active loans

 

32.8

 

  

33.4

 

  

32.4

 

  

3.1

 

  

3.2

 

  

3.5

 

  

35.9

 

  

36.6

 

35.9

Market size

 

52.5

(1)

51.8

(1)

51.7

(1)

13.0

(2)

12.2

(2)

12.6

(2)

65.5

 

64.0

 

64.3

Market share

 

63

%  

64

%  

63

%  

24

%  

26

%  

28

%  

55

%  

57

%  

56

%

Note: Amounts above may not recalculate due to rounding.

(1)Estimates according to the Black Knight First Look press release dated February 24, 2023 for U.S. first lien mortgage loans. These estimates are subject to change.
(2)Estimates according to the January 2023, 2022 and 2021 Equifax National Consumer Credit Trends Report: Portfolio for U.S. second lien mortgage loans. These estimates are subject to revision.

As a result of the effects of the broad-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen lower foreclosure-related transactional revenues due to the mortgage loan foreclosure moratorium and other measures that were in effect from 2020 through 2021. Additionally, low unemployment and historically low interest rates drove high home price appreciation, which also contributed to historically low foreclosure starts. In 2022, we had higher foreclosure-related transactional revenues compared to 2021 as a result of the expirationexchange of shares of DNB common stock as part of the federal foreclosure moratorium.

Although foreclosure starts were higherconsideration for acquiring the remaining 40% interest in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC in February 2022, compared to 2021, they were still an increase in Net earnings attributable to Black Knight of $2.6 million, or $0.02 per diluted share in 2021.

Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EPS are non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below levels priorfor a reconciliation of these measures to the pandemic. The table below shows pre-pandemicmost directly comparable GAAP measures.

Our Compensation Programs are Driven by Our Business Objectives

Our compensation committee takes great care to post-pandemic industry volumes for foreclosure starts accordingdevelop and refine an executive compensation program that recognizes our stewardship responsibility to the Black Knight First Look press release dated February 24, 2023 (in thousands):

2022

    

355.0

2021

 

84.0

2020

 

191.0

2019

 

538.0

2018

 

593.0

In addition to lower foreclosure-related transactional revenues, we also have seen increases in inactive loans in the prior year period due to the higher mortgage loan origination volumes, particularly refinance volumes. Elevated origination refinance volumes in prior years increased the numberour shareholders while our talent strategy supports a culture of inactive loans above historical levels. A mortgage loan becomes inactive on MSP® oncegrowth, innovation, and performance.

Our compensation committee believes it is paid offimportant to reward our executives for strong performance in an industry with significant operational and a servicer continuesregulatory challenges, and to keepincentivize them to deliver strong results for our investors by winning new clients, cross-selling to existing clients, innovating with urgency and executing acquisitions to further enhance our offerings.

At the loan on MSP® for reporting purposes. In 2022, the number of inactive loans declined duesame time, our compensation committee believes it is important to prior year originations, which resulted in lower usage-based revenues relateddiscourage our executives from taking unnecessary risks. The compensation committee believes that our compensation programs are structured to inactive loans on MSP®. Our origination software solutions primarily include our solutions that automate and facilitate the origination of mortgage loans and provide an interconnected network allowing the various parties and systems associated with lending transactions to exchange data quickly and efficiently.foster these goals.

10

39

The table below summarizesWe believe that our executive compensation programs are structured in a manner to support our Company and to achieve our business objectives. For 2022, our executive compensation approach was designed with the estimates of the number of loans in mortgage origination market (in millions):following goals:

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

    

2019

Mortgage loan originations (# of loans):

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Purchase

3.9

5.2

4.9

4.4

Refinance

2.0

8.3

8.8

3.4

Total - MBA(1)

5.9

13.5

13.7

7.8

Purchase

4.4

5.0

4.7

4.3

Refinance

2.4

8.6

8.7

3.6

Total - Black Knight(2)

6.8

13.6

13.4

7.9

Equifax(3)

14.1

13.9

8.2

Note: Amounts may not recalculate due to rounding.

(1)·Sound Program Design. We designed our compensation programs to fit with our Company, our strategy and our culture. There are many facets and considerations that enter into this equation, some of which are discussed below in “—Compensation Best Practices.” Consequently, we aim to deliver a sound compensation program, reflecting a comprehensive set of data points and supporting our success.

·Pay-for-Performance. We designed our compensation programs so that a substantial majority of our executives’ compensation is tied to our performance. We used pre-defined performance goals for our annual cash-incentives to make pay-for-performance the key driver of the cash compensation paid to our named executive officers. The U.S. mortgage loan origination marketperformance measures used for purchaseour 2022 annual incentive plan are Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EPS, Sales Annual Contract Value (ACV), and refinance originationsstrategic risk management objectives. The financial performance measures we use are key components in the way we and our investors view our operating success and are highly transparent and objectively determinable. The committee includes the strategic risk management objective in our annual incentive plan because it is estimatedreflective of the priority our board places on our executives’ oversight and management of the risks facing our business, including those related to cybersecurity in particular. To complement the annual incentives, we used performance-based restricted stock awards in 2022. These grants tie executives to our shareholder return and our operating performance over the long-term. Our performance-based long-term incentives are linked to our executive stock ownership guidelines, where together the grants and the guidelines strongly promote long-term stock ownership and provide direct alignment with our shareholders.
·Competitiveness. Total compensation is intended to be competitive in order to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified and effective executives who can build shareholder value over the long-term. The level of pay our compensation committee sets for each named executive officer is influenced by the February 2023 MBA Mortgage Finance Forecast. These estimates are subjectexecutive’s leadership abilities, scope of responsibilities, experience, effectiveness, and individual performance achievements, as well as a detailed assessment of the compensation paid by our peers.

·Incentive Pay Balance. We believe the portion of total compensation contingent on performance should increase with an executive’s level of responsibility. Annual and long-term incentive compensation opportunities should reward the appropriate balance of short- and long-term financial and strategic business results. In the case of promotions, we use time-based restricted stock awards to future revisions.bring our executives compensation to an acceptable range and to encourage retention. Our compensation committee believes long-term incentive compensation opportunities should significantly outweigh short-term cash-based opportunities. Annual objectives should be compatible with sustainable long-term performance.
(2)·Investor Alignment and Risk Assumption. We place a strong emphasis on delivering long-term results for our investors and clients and discourage excessive risk taking by our executive officers.

·Good Governance. Good compensation governance plays a prominent role in our approach to compensation. As discussed in the next section, our compensation committee reviews current trends in compensation governance and adopts policies that work for us.

We believe it is important to deliver strong results for our investors and clients, and we believe our practice of linking compensation with corporate performance will help us to accomplish that goal.

11

Compensation Best Practices

We take a proactive approach to compensation governance. Our compensation committee regularly reviews our compensation programs and makes adjustments that it believes are in the best interests of the Company and our investors. As part of this process, our compensation committee reviews compensation trends and considers current best practices and makes changes in our compensation programs when the committee deems it appropriate, all with the goal of continually improving our approach to executive compensation. Our 2022 compensation programs include the following notable best practices:

Things We Do:
Set a high ratio of performance-based compensation to total compensation, and a low ratio of non-performance-based compensation, including fixed benefits, perquisites and salary, to total compensation.
Maintain aggressive stock ownership guidelines that are linked to a holding period requirement for executives and directors who have not met the guidelines.
 ✓Clawback any overpayments of incentive-based or equity-based compensation that were attributable to restated financial results.
 ✓Our compensation committee sets maximum levels payable under our annual incentives, and our equity incentive plan has a limited award pool.
 ✓Our long-term equity incentive awards granted to our officers use a vesting schedule of at least three years, and awards granted under our omnibus incentive plan vest no sooner than one year after the grant date, except in the case of unanticipated, early vesting due to death, disability or a termination of employment in connection with a change in control, with a standard carveout for awards relating to no more than 5% of the plan’s share reserve. 
 ✓Generally, require achievement of a performance-based vesting goal in each year of the vesting term of our annual restricted stock awards to our officers.
 ✓Dividends and dividend equivalents would be paid only on equity awards that vest. 
 ✓Limit perquisites. 
 ✓Our compensation committee uses an independent compensation consultant who reports solely to the compensation committee. 
 ✓The U.S. mortgage loan origination market for purchase and refinance originationsdilution rate from our equity-based incentive awards is estimated by the Black Knight First Look press release dated February 24, 2023. These estimates are subject to future revisions.well below industry average. 
(3) ✓The U.S. mortgage loan origination market for total originationsBoard compensation is estimated by the January 2023 Equifax U.S. National Consumer Credit Trends Report: Originations. The 2022 number of loans is not included as the full year information is not yet available. The year-to-date October 2022 estimate is 6.1 million. These estimates are subject to future revisions.below peer group average. 

Our direct exposure

Things We Don’t Do:
XProvide tax gross-ups or reimbursement of taxes on perquisites. 
XPermit the repricing of stock options or any equivalent form of equity incentive. 
XHave multi-year guarantees for salary increases or guaranteed equity compensation in our executive employment agreements. 
XEmployment agreements do not allow tax gross-ups for compensation paid due to a change of control and do not contain single trigger severance payment arrangements related to a change of control. 
XSupplemental executive retirement plans, executive pensions or excessive retirement benefits. 

12

2022 Shareholder Engagement

We are committed to origination volumes is limited as our loan origination system revenues are based on closed loan volumes subjecthearing and responding to minimum base software subscription fees that are contractually obligated. Although we have revenues that are driven primarily from refinance loan applications, these revenues were approximately 2%the views of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022. Mostshareholders. In 2022, our officers met with investors on various occasions, both in group and one-on-one settings. The investors with whom we met in 2022 represented six of our secondary marketing technologies’ revenues are primarily subscription-based; however, some platforms are based on the numbertop 15 shareholders, who collectively owned more than 27% of loan officer seats. In 2022, we have seen a reduction in loan officer seats due to cost reduction actions from clients, including clients downsizing their mortgage origination workforce or exiting the origination market due to the current interest rate environment. According to the Q3 2022 Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (“NMLS”) Mortgage Industry Report, the number of active individual licensed mortgage loan officers has decreased from 123,622our shares as of December 31, 20212022. At these meetings, our officers discuss a variety of topics, including our operational and stock performance, ESG, corporate governance and executive compensation matters. We report and discuss these meetings with our board or applicable board committees, as appropriate.

Overview of Our Compensation Programs

Principal Components of Compensation

We link a significant portion of each named executive officer’s total annual compensation to 102,251 as of September 30, 2022. The reduction in seat counts during 2022 caused a reduction in usage-based revenues for our clients with licensesperformance goals that are seat-basedintended to deliver measurable results. Executives are generally rewarded only when and were previously above their contractual minimums.

Someif the pre-established performance goals are met or exceeded. We also believe that material ownership stakes for executives assist in aligning executives’ interests with those of shareholders and strongly motivate executives to build long-term value. We structure our compensation programs to assist in creating this link. The principal components of our origination software solutions are directly exposedexecutive compensation program for 2022 were base salaries, annual cash incentives, and long-term performance-based equity incentive awards. In connection, with certain leadership transitions discussed below, we also granted time-based restricted stock awards to variancesMessrs. Nackashi and Larsen under to our Amended and Rested 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Incentive Plan). In connection with the ICE Merger, our compensation committee also approved certain compensation decisions, including with respect to fine-tuning certain provisions of our named executive officers’ employment agreements and accelerating discretionary bonus and 2022 annual cash incentive payments and the vesting of certain equity awards to mitigate the potential impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on our executives and Black Knight.

13

The chart on the following page illustrates the principal elements of our named executive officer compensation program in origination volumes, primarily related2022:

Fixed CompensationShort-Term IncentivesLong-Term IncentivesBenefits
Base SalaryAnnual Cash
Incentive
Performance-based
Restricted Stock
Employee stock purchase plan; 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan; and limited perquisites.
Fixed cash component with annual merit increase opportunity based on responsibilities, individual performance results and other considerations.Annual cash award for profitability, growth, operating strength and risk oversight during the year.Annual restricted stock grants with service and performance-based vesting conditions tied to operating strength and efficiency. Our restricted stock awards also contain holding requirements tied to our stock ownership guidelines to promote significant long-term stock ownership.
Link to
Performance
Link to
Performance
Link to
Performance
Individual performanceAdjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EPS, sales annual contract value and strategic risk management objectivesAdjusted EBITDA and shareholder return

In 2022, our compensation committee placed heavy emphasis on the at-risk, performance-based components of performance-based cash incentives and performance-based equity incentive awards. The compensation committee determined the appropriate value of each component of compensation after considering each executive’s level of responsibility, the individual skills, experience and potential contribution of each executive, and the ability of each executive to refinance volumes, dueimpact Company-wide performance and create long-term value. As shown in the table on the following page, on average approximately 68% of total compensation of our named executive officers (other than Ms. Meyers, and excluding the one-time Discretionary Bonus paid to Mr. Jabbour in 2022 to mitigate the potential impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on Mr. Jabbour and Black Knight) was based on performance-based incentives and benefits comprised less than 3% of total compensation. The compensation committee believes a significant portion of an executive officer’s compensation should be allocated to compensation that effectively aligns the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our investors.

In particular, with respect to Mr. Nackashi, our compensation committee considered the increased responsibilities he would assume in connection with his transition from President to CEO, including the critical role he has played in the continued oversight and execution of our business strategy following the announcement of the ICE Merger. The committee also considered the below-market positioning of Mr. Nackashi’s base salary and determined to set his annual incentive at a higher level to drive performance and position his overall pay, including his long-term equity incentive, at an appropriate level. For Mr. Jabbour, the compensation committee considered the critical role he plays in our organization in shaping and providing continuity with respect to the natureCompany’s strategic vision and his continued mentorship of Mr. Nackashi. For the services provided. We have seen lower origination volumes in 2022 due to higher interest rates and record volumes in prior years. According tolast several years, Mr. Jabbour has led the February 2023 Mortgage Bankers Association Mortgage Finance Forecast, mortgage loan originations have declined 56% for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to 2021. The portionexecution of our originationstrategic vision, including organically growing our software, solutions revenues that are more sensitive to origination volumes were approximately 3% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022, and revenues related to these origination software solutions declined approximately 34% compared to 2021, representing a headwind of approximately $22.7 million.

Data and Analytics

Our Data and Analytics segment offers data and analytics businesses with urgency through selling our products to new clients, cross-selling additional services to existing clients, and innovating through the development of new solutions and refining our current offerings to provide better insight to our clients, and selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions, while maintaining an efficient cost structure to create the most value for our shareholders. In 2022, Mr. Jabbour also played significant role in the negotiation of the ICE Merger, the value of which represents a 27% premium to our stock price on March 3, 2023 and a 27% premium to our stock price on April 4, 2022, the last date before the publication of news reports relating to a potential acquisition of Black Knight (in each case based upon a merger consideration value of $75 per share).

14

Allocation of Total Compensation for 2022

The following tables show the allocation of 2022 total compensation paid to our named executive officers as reported in the Summary Compensation Table below. The compensation committee believed this allocation to be appropriate after considering the factors described above, including the new roles and responsibilities of our executives and Mr. Jabbour’s significant role in executing on our growth strategies and negotiating a significant premium for our stockholders in connection with the ICE Merger.

Name Salary  Performance-
Based Equity
Incentives
  Time-Based
Equity
Incentives
  Annual
Cash
Incentive
  Benefits
& Other
Compensation
  Discretionary
Bonus2
  Total
Compensation
  Performance-
Based
Compensation1
 
Anthony M. Jabbour  1.2%  14.9%  0.0%  1.2%  1.2%  81.5%  100%  16.1%
Joseph M. Nackashi  8.3%  41.9%  30.0%  9.0%  2.7%  8.1%  100%  50.9%
Kirk T. Larsen  10.0%  56.6%  16.5%  8.2%  1.4%  7.3%  100%  64.8%
Michael L. Gravelle  14.1%  71.4%  0.0%  7.1%  1.1%  6.3%  100%  78.5%
Michele M. Meyers  86.6%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  13.4%  0.0%  100%  0.0%

1.Calculated from Total Compensation, less the amounts included in “Salary”, “Time-Based Equity Incentives”, “Discretionary Bonus,” and “Benefits and Other Compensation”
2.Amounts include the amounts paid as annual performance-based cash incentives to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle with respect to adjustments made to the performance results to account for the impact of the pending ICE Merger as described under the section titled “Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive” below. With respect to Mr. Jabbour, the amount also includes a one-time $40,000,000 discretionary bonus paid with respect to the ICE Merger, which was paid in 2022 to mitigate the impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code following closing of the ICE Merger.

The following table reflects the allocation of Mr. Jabbour’s 2022 total compensation excluding the impact of a one-time discretionary bonus paid to Mr. Jabbour in connection with the ICE Merger (the Discretionary Bonus). The Discretionary Bonus was paid after consideration of Mr. Jabbour’s significant contributions to the mortgage, real estateCompany and capital markets verticals. These solutions include property ownership data, lien data, servicing data, automated valuation models, collateral risk scores, behavioral models,the critical role he plays in our organization in shaping and providing continuity with respect to the Company’s strategic vision. The Discretionary Bonus, which is contingent upon the successful closing of the ICE Merger, was paid to Mr. Jabbour in December 2022 in connection with certain tax-planning actions to mitigate the potential impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on Mr. Jabbour and Black Knight. In furtherance of the early payment of the Discretionary Bonus, the Company and Mr. Jabbour entered into a multiple listing service software solutionletter agreement that provides that (i) the after-tax proceeds of the Discretionary Bonus be placed into an escrow account, and other data solutions. (ii) if Mr. Jabbour is terminated by the Company for cause or Mr. Jabbour resigns his employment without good reason, in each case prior to consummation of the ICE Merger, or if the Merger Agreement is terminated without the consummation of the ICE Merger, Mr. Jabbour will be required to pay liquidated damages to Black Knight equal to the value of the after-tax proceeds of the Discretionary Bonus that would not have ultimately been paid absent the tax-planning actions described above (plus any tax refund he receives in respect of such payment).

Name Salary  Performance-
Based Equity
Incentives
  Time-Based
Equity
Incentives
  Annual
Cash
Incentive
  Benefits
& Other
Compensation
  Discretionary
Bonus
  Total
Compensation
  Performance-
Based
Compensation
 
Anthony M. Jabbour  5.9%  73.7%  0.0%  5.9%  5.6%  8.8%  100%  79.6%

15

 

* Excludes Mr. Jabbour's Discretionary Bonus. 

Analysis of Compensation Components

Note that the financial measures used as performance targets for our named executive officers described in this discussion are non-GAAP measures and differ from the comparable GAAP measures reported in our financial statements. We explain how we use these non-GAAP measures in our discussions about incentives below.

Base Salary

Base salaries reflect the fixed component of the compensation for an executive officer’s ongoing contribution to the operating performance of his or her area of responsibility. We provide our named executive officers with base salaries that are intended to provide them with a level of assured, regularly paid cash compensation that is competitive and reasonable.

Our data and analytics business is primarily based on longer-term strategic data licenses, other data licenses and subscription-based revenues. Our data and analytics revenues were 14%, 15% and 16%compensation committee reviews salary levels annually as part of our consolidated revenuesperformance review process, as well as in the event of promotions or other changes in our named executive officers’ positions or responsibilities. When establishing base salary levels, our compensation committee considered the peer compensation data provided by our independent compensation consultant, as well as a number of qualitative factors, including the named executive officer’s experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility and performance.

As discussed further below, Messrs. Nackashi’s and Larsen’s base salaries were adjusted in connection with the executive leadership transition.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive

In 2022, we awarded annual cash incentive opportunities to each named executive officer. We use the annual incentives to provide a form of at risk, performance-based pay that is focused on achievement of critical, objectively measurable, financial objectives. These financial objectives are tied to our annual budget and our strategic planning process, which provide the basis for communicating our performance expectations to the investment community. It is reviewed in detail and approved by our board. Consistent with prior years, ended December 31,the 2022 2021 and 2020, respectively. The portionannual cash incentives were conditioned upon the achievement of pre-defined objectives for fiscal year 2022, which were determined by our compensation committee. In 2022, 90% of our datanamed executive officers’ target annual incentives were tied to four objective financial metrics, with the remaining 10% tied to strategic risk management objectives. The performance measures were formulaic, established by the compensation committee in writing in February 2022, and, analytics solutions revenuesas applicable, final payment amounts were derived from our audited and reported financial results. In setting the performance measures, the committee generally seeks to set targets that are more sensitivehigher than the prior year results. In May 2022, the compensation committee determined to fluctuationsincrease Mr. Nackashi’s annual incentive target from 150% to 200% of his base salary in home buying activitylight of his increased responsibilities in connection with his transition to CEO and origination volumes primarily relate to services where we provide softwareencourage significant focus on execution of the Company’s strategic vision and data necessaryoperating performance.

16

Our annual cash incentives play an important role in our approach to total compensation. They motivate participants to work hard and proficiently toward improving our operating performance and achieving our business plan for tax dataa fiscal year. We believe that achieving our financial and other settlement service activities. Revenues from these solutions were approximately 2%risk objectives is a result of executing our business strategy, which is to drive growth by winning new clients, cross-selling to existing clients and innovating with urgency to further enhance our offerings, while successfully managing the financial and strategic risks of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022 and declined approximately 31% compared to 2021,

40

representing a headwind of approximately $16.5 million. TitlePoint revenues that were more sensitive to fluctuations in home buying and origination volumes were approximately 1.8%business. The execution of our consolidated revenuesbusiness strategy is important to delivering long-term value for the year ended December 31, 2022 and declined 22% compared to 2021, representing approximately $7.8 million of the headwind.

Regulatory Requirements

There continues to be a high level of legislative and regulatory focus on consumer protection practices. As a result, federal and state governments have enacted various new laws, rules and regulations. This has led banks and other lenders to seek software solutions that assist them in satisfying their regulatory compliance obligations in the face of a changing regulatory environment. We have developed solutions that target this need, which has resulted in additional revenues.

The CFPB has issued guidance that applies to "supervised service providers," which the CFPB has defined to include service providers, like us, to CFPB-supervised banks and non-banks.our stakeholders. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reformannual cash incentive program helps to attract and Consumer Protection Actretain a highly qualified workforce and to maintain a market competitive compensation program.

In the first quarter of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") contains2022, our compensation committee approved the Mortgage Reform2022 performance objectives and Anti-Predatory Lending Act that imposes additional requirements on lendersa target incentive opportunity for our named executive officers as well as the potential incentive opportunity range for threshold and servicers of residential mortgage loans. Future legislative or regulatory changes are difficultmaximum performance. No annual incentive payments were payable to predict,an executive officer if the pre-established, threshold performance levels were not met, and new laws or regulations that may be implemented by the CFPB or other regulatory bodies may require us to change our business practices or incur increased costs to comply.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon audited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures with respect to contingent liabilities and assetspayments were capped at the date ofmaximum performance payout level. The compensation committee had the consolidated financial statementsauthority to reduce (but not increase) an executive’s annual incentive award, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Certain of our accounting policies and estimates require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgmentsannual incentive awards are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our actual results may differ from those estimates. See Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional description of the significant accounting policies that have been followed in preparingrecoupment under our consolidated financial statements.clawback policy.

The accounting policies described below are those we consider to be the most critical to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations and that require the most complex and subjective management judgment.

Revenue Recognition

At times, revenue recognition requires significant judgment, especially for our complex arrangements that include multiple performance obligations, or deliverables, such as arrangements that include the implementation of several software solutions over a period of time as well as post-implementation subscription fees and support for those solutions. The amount of revenues we recognize in a particular periodthe annual incentives actually paid depends on the value we allocatelevel of achievement of the pre-established goals as follows:

·If threshold performance is not achieved, no incentive will be paid.

·If threshold performance is achieved, the incentive payout will equal 50% of the executive officer’s target incentive opportunity.

·If target performance is achieved, the incentive payout will equal 100% of the target incentive opportunity for Mr. Gravelle; and 150% for Mr. Larsen, and 200% for each of Messrs. Jabbour and Nackashi.

·If maximum performance is achieved, the incentive payout will equal 200% of the executive officer’s target incentive opportunity, except for Mr. Jabbour whose 2022 maximum incentive opportunity was equal to 300% of his target incentive opportunity.

·Between these levels, the payout is prorated.

Threshold performance levels were established to challenge our executive officers. Maximum performance levels were established to limit annual incentive awards so as to avoid excessive compensation while encouraging executives to reach for performance beyond the products and services delivered during that period. Our critical judgments for revenue recognition relate to (i) identifying performance obligations within the arrangement, including whether those obligations are distinct or should be combined; (ii) determining the standalone selling price ("SSP") for each performance obligation; and (iii) determining the effect of contract modifications.  

Deliverytarget levels. An important tenet of our primary software solutionspay for performance philosophy is oftento utilize our compensation programs to motivate our executives to achieve performance levels that reach beyond what is expected of us as a company.


Target performance levels are intended to be difficult to achieve, but not unrealistic. The performance targets were based on discussions between management and our compensation committee. In setting 2022 performance metrics, our compensation committee considered a distinct performance obligation; however, certain agreements that include complex, proprietary implementation-related professional services require judgment to determine if the software solutionour 2022 financial plan and related implementation professional services should be combined into one performance obligation.sales pipeline, management’s continued focus on managing risk, and prior year performance.

The SSP for many2022 financial performance metrics and weightings were consistent with the 2021 financial performance metrics and weightings except Sales Contract Value was replaced with Sales Annual Contract Value (Sales ACV). These performance metrics are among the most important measures in evaluating the financial performance of our solutionsbusiness, and services is basedthey can have a significant effect on observable selling prices. However, when observable selling prices are not available, judgment and analysis is required to establish an estimated SSP through consideration of all reasonably available information, including market conditions, demands, trends, our specific factors and information

41

about the client or class of client. The adjusted market approach is generally used when observable inputs are not available or limited.

Contract modifications require judgment to determine if the modification should be accounted for as (i) a separate contract, (ii) the termination of the original contract andlong-term value creation of a new contract or (iii) a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the original contract. When evaluating contract modifications, we must identify the performance obligations of the modified contract and determine both the allocation of revenues to the remaining performance obligations and the period of recognition for each identified performance obligation.

Purchase Accounting

We are required to allocateinvestment community’s expectations. In the purchase price of acquired businesses tofollowing table, we explain how we calculate or assess the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, with the excess recorded as goodwill. We generally engage third-party valuation specialists to assist us in making fair value determinations. The third-party valuation specialists generally use discounted cash flow models, which require internally-developed assumptions, to determine the acquisition fair value of client relationship intangible assets and developed technology software assets. Assumptions for client relationship asset valuations generally include forecasted revenue attributable to existing customer contracts and relationships, estimated annual attrition, forecasted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization margin and estimated weighted average cost of capital and discount rates. Assumptions for software asset valuations generally include forecasted revenue attributable to the software assets, obsolescence rates, estimated royalty rates and estimated weighted average cost of capital and discount rates. The forecasted financial performance used in the discounted cash flow models are critical accounting estimates in determining the fair value of customer relationshipsmeasures and software asset valuations as these estimates are influenced by many factors, including historical financial information and management’s expectation for future operating results as a combined company.why we use them.

If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period during which the combination took place, we are required to record provisional amounts in our consolidated financial statements for items for which the accounting has not been completed. Measurement period adjustments to provisional purchase price allocations are recognized in the period in which they are determined, with the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income resulting from such changes calculated as if the accounting had been completed on the acquisition date. Any new assets or liabilities identified during the measurement period are recognized as of the acquisition date. The measurement period ends the sooner of one year from the acquisition date or when we receive the information we were seeking about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date or learn that more information is not obtainable.

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of a reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. Goodwill impairment assessments require a significant amount of management judgement, and a meaningful change in one or more of the underlying forecasts, estimates or assumptions used in testing goodwill for impairment could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. Our impairment test may first consider qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Qualitative factors include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market changes, our overall financial performance, changes in share price and other events or changes in circumstances that could negatively affect us. If the results of a qualitative assessment indicate a potential for impairment, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed. The quantitative process of determining whether or not an asset, such as goodwill, is impaired or recoverable relies on a weighted average of multiple valuation methods, primarily a combination of an income approach and a market approach. The income approach includes the present value of estimated future cash flows, while the market approach uses earnings multiples of similar guideline public companies or of similar guideline transactions. The income approach used to assess goodwill for impairment is a critical estimate because the forecasted growth rate assumptions underlying the estimated future cash flows is subject to management's judgement based upon the best available market information, internal forecasts and operating plans. A deterioration in this assumption could adversely impact our results of operations and financial position.

42

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we performed a qualitative assessment for our annual goodwill impairment test, and we concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting units continued to exceed its respective carrying values.

Results of Operations

See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 25, 2022, for a discussion of our consolidated and segment results of operations for 2021 compared to 2020.

Key Performance Metrics

Revenues, EBITDA and EBITDA Margin for the Software Solutions and Data and Analytics segments are presented in conformity with ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting. These measures are reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segments and assessing their performance. For these reasons, these measures are excluded from the definition of non-GAAP financial measures under the SEC’s Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following tables present certain financial data for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

 

Revenues

$

1,551.9

$

1,475.2

$

1,238.5

Expenses:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Operating expenses

 

872.3

 

793.9

 

669.6

Depreciation and amortization

 

369.6

 

365.0

 

270.7

Transition and integration costs

 

31.8

 

13.3

 

31.4

Total expenses

 

1,273.7

 

1,172.2

 

971.7

Operating income

 

278.2

 

303.0

 

266.8

Operating margin

 

17.9

%

 

20.5

%

 

21.5

%

Interest expense, net

 

(100.6)

 

(83.6)

 

(62.9)

Other (expense) income, net

 

(11.9)

 

(6.4)

 

16.4

Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

165.7

 

213.0

 

220.3

Income tax expense

 

22.4

 

35.7

 

41.6

Earnings before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

143.3

 

177.3

 

178.7

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

306.7

 

2.6

 

67.1

Net earnings

 

450.0

 

179.9

 

245.8

Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

2.5

 

28.0

 

18.3

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

$

452.5

$

207.9

$

264.1

Net earnings per share attributable to Black Knight common shareholders:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Diluted

$

2.91

$

1.33

$

1.73

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Diluted

 

155.6

 

155.8

 

152.9

43

Segment Financial Results

Revenues

We generate revenues through contractual arrangements we enter into with our clients to provide products or services either individually or in combination with one another as part of an integrated offering of multiple services. These arrangements occasionally include offerings from more than one segment to the same client.

The following table sets forth revenues by segment for the periods presented (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31, 

Variance

    

2022

    

2021

    

$

%

Software Solutions

$

1,333.9

$

1,250.0

$

83.9

7

%

Data and Analytics

 

218.0

 

225.2

 

(7.2)

(3)

%

Total

$

1,551.9

$

1,475.2

$

76.7

5

%

Software Solutions

Our Software Solutions segment revenues are primarily derived from software solutions and professional services. Revenues from software solutions are typically volume-based agreements driven by factors such as the number of accounts processed, transactions processed and system resources utilized. The agreements typically have minimum volumes that results in high levels of recurring revenue. Professional services consist of pre-implementation and post-implementation support and services and are primarily billed on a time and materials basis. Professional services may also include dedicated teams provided as part of agreements with software solutions clients.

Revenues were $1,333.9 million in 2022 compared to $1,250.0 million in 2021, an increase of $83.9 million, or 7%. Our servicing software solutions revenues increased $44.9 million, or 5%, primarily driven by incremental revenues from new and existing clients, an increase of $21.6 million in foreclosure-related revenues and contract termination fees of $3.9 million, partially offset by headwinds from lower transactional revenues, including a decline in inactive loans, and attrition. Our origination software solutions revenues increased $39.0 million, or 9%, primarily driven by revenues from new and existing clients, revenues of $14.0 million related to an acquired business, an increase of $9.1 million in contract termination fees and an increase of $5.3 million in license fees, partially offset by a decrease of $22.7 million in revenues due to lower origination volumes and attrition.

Data and Analytics

Our Data and Analytics segment revenues are primarily derived from property ownership data, lien data, servicing data, automated valuation models, collateral risk scores, behavioral models, a multiple listing service software solution and other data solutions.

Revenues were $218.0 million in 2022 compared to $225.2 million in 2021, a decrease of $7.2 million, or 3%. The decrease was primarily driven by new sales that were more than offset by a decrease of $16.5 million related to the effect of lower origination volumes, lower revenues related to a reduction in scope for two long-term strategic data deal renewals and attrition.

44

EBITDA and EBITDA margin

The following tables set forth EBITDA (in millions) and EBITDA margin by segment for the periods presented:

 

Year ended December 31, 

Variance

    

2022

    

2021

    

$

%

Software Solutions

$

736.5

$

713.7

$

22.8

3

%

Data and Analytics

 

69.3

 

80.2

 

(10.9)

(14)

%

Year ended December 31, 

Variance

    

2022

2021

Basis points

Software Solutions

 

55.2

%  

57.1

%  

(190)

Data and Analytics

 

31.8

%  

35.6

%  

(380)

Software Solutions

EBITDA was $736.5 million in 2022 compared to $713.7 million in 2021, an increase of $22.8 million, or 3%, with an EBITDA margin of 55.2% compared to 57.1% in 2021. The EBITDA margin decrease was driven by revenue mix along with higher personnel costs, technology-related costs, including cloud costs and other software subscriptions, an increase in client credit loss expense primarily related to a client that is no longer in business, and sales and marketing costs.

Data and Analytics

EBITDA was $69.3 million in 2022 compared to $80.2 million in 2021, a decrease of $10.9 million, or 14%, with an EBITDA margin of 31.8% compared to 35.6% in 2021. The EBITDA margin decrease was primarily driven by revenue mix along with higher personnel costs, technology-related costs and sales and marketing costs.

Consolidated Financial Results

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses primarily include compensation costs, including equity-based compensation and benefits, hardware and software maintenance costs, software subscription costs, cloud computing costs, occupancy costs and professional services.

The following table sets forth operating expenses by segment for the periods presented (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31, 

Variance

    

2022

    

2021

    

$

%

Software Solutions

$

597.4

$

536.3

$

61.1

11

%

Data and Analytics

 

148.7

 

145.0

 

3.7

3

%

Corporate and Other(1)

 

126.2

 

112.6

 

13.6

12

%

Total

$

872.3

$

793.9

$

78.4

10

%

(1)Performance
Measure
Operating expensesWeightHow CalculatedReason for CorporateUse
Adjusted
revenues
20%We define Adjusted revenues as Revenues adjusted to include the revenues that we did not record during the respective period due to the deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustment recorded in accordance with GAAP. We also exclude the effect of in-year acquisitions and divestitures and the market and/or legislative effect on origination and foreclosure volumes.Adjusted revenues is an important measure of our performance as it reflects the execution of our growth strategy. Adjusted revenues is widely followed by the investment community.
Adjusted
EBITDA
20%We define Adjusted EBITDA as Net earnings attributable to Black Knight, with adjustments to reflect the addition or elimination of certain statement of earnings items including, but not limited to (i) Depreciation and amortization; (ii) Impairment charges; (iii) Interest expense, net; (iv) Income tax expense; (v) Other include(income) expense, net; (vi) Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax; (vii) (Gains) losses on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax; (viii) Net earnings (losses) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests; (ix) deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustment; (x) equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes,taxes; (xi) acquisition-related costs, including costs pursuant to purchase agreements; (xii) costs related to the ICE Transaction; and (xiii) costs associated with expense reduction initiatives. We also exclude the effect of $55.7 millionin-year acquisitions and $42.9 milliondivestitures and the market and/or legislative effect on origination and foreclosure volumes.Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure of our performance as it reflects growth and operational efficiency. Adjusted EBITDA is a common basis for enterprise valuation and widely followed by the investment community.
Adjusted EPS20%We define Adjusted EPS as Adjusted net earnings divided by the diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding. Adjusted net earnings is defined as Net earnings attributable to Black Knight, with adjustments to reflect the addition or elimination of certain statement of earnings items including, but not limited to: (i) equity in 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The increase in Operating Expenses in 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily driven by $37.5 million in higher net personnel expenses, including(earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax; (ii) (gains) losses on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax; (iii) the effect of wage inflation above our typical annual increases, $13.7 million in higher technology-related costs, $8.4 million in higher sales and marketing costs, including higher costs related to travel, and an increase of $8.2 million in client credit loss expense primarily related to a client that is no longer in business.

45

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense consists of our depreciation related to investments in property and equipment, including hardware, as well as amortization of purchased and developed software and other intangible assets, primarily client relationship assets recorded in connection with acquisitions. It also includes the amortization of deferred contract costs.

The following table sets forth Depreciation and amortization by segment for the periods presented (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31, 

Variance

    

2022

    

2021

    

$

%

Software Solutions

$

146.6

$

131.1

$

15.5

12

%

Data and Analytics

 

15.8

 

15.5

 

0.3

2

%

Corporate and Other(1)

 

207.2

 

218.4

 

(11.2)

(5)

%

Total

$

369.6

$

365.0

$

4.6

1

%

(1)Depreciation and amortization for Corporate and Other primarily represents net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting; (iv) deferred revenue purchase accounting recorded in accordanceadjustment; (v) equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes; (vi) costs associated with GAAP.debt and/ or equity offerings; (vii) acquisition-related costs, including costs pursuant to purchase agreements; (viii) costs related to the ICE Transaction; (ix) costs associated with expense reduction initiatives; (x) costs and settlement (gains) losses associated with significant legal matters; (x) adjustment for income tax expense primarily related to the tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments and a discrete income tax benefit related to the establishment of a deferred tax asset as a result of our reorganization of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries; and (xi) adjustment for redeemable non-controlling interests primarily related to the effect of the non-GAAP adjustments. We also exclude the effect of in-year acquisitions and divestitures and the market and/or legislative effect on origination and foreclosure volumes.Adjusted EPS is an important measure of our performance as it reflects growth and profitability as well as the effectiveness of our capital allocation. Adjusted EPS is a common basis for equity valuation and widely followed by the investment community.


Sales ACV30%We define Sales ACV as the total annualized value of a contract. ACV is calculated by taking the total incremental revenue from a new client contract and dividing it by the number of years in the term of such contract. An assumed term of three years is used for contracts that do not have a specified term. ACV for transactional service contracts without minimums is estimated using conservative pro forma models based on historical usage rates. ACV excludes professional services deals unless it’s a net new dedicated team under contract for at least 12 months or an implementation fee that will be recognized over the life of a software contract.Sales ACV is an important measure of our performance as it is a driver of future revenue growth. It rewards management for success at selling new products and services to our clients and gaining new clients. We believe this performance measure is a tangible indication of how well our executives’ immediate efforts will grow and impact Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS in future years.

Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted EPS are non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors in evaluating our overall financial performance. We believe these measures provide useful information about operating results and profitability, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision making.

Final calculations of our achievement of the performance measures are subject to certain adjustments as described above, including the effect of in-year acquisitions and divestitures and the market and/or legislative effect on origination and foreclosure volumes. These adjustments encourage our executives to focus on achieving strong financial performance and efficient operation of our continuing businesses during the year to achieve the performance measures. The adjustments also ensure that the achievement of the performance measures, as determined by the compensation committee at the end of the performance period, correlate with the budget and thereby serve as barometers of management’s performance in growing our business and operating the business effectively and efficiently irrespective of impacts, positive or negative, of legislative or market influences. The adjustments also encourage our executives to focus on the long-term benefit of acquisitions or divestitures regardless of whether they may have a positive or negative impact on our Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA or Adjusted EPS in the current year.

Since 2018, our named executive officer’s annual incentives have also included a qualitative risk-based performance criteria, reflecting the importance our board places on management’s actions to manage and mitigate risk across Black Knight. To emphasize the significance of cybersecurity risk and other risks to our organization and to focus our executives on effectively managing these risks, the committee determined to once again tie 10% of our executives’ annual incentive awards to the achievement of the Company’s risk objectives for 2022. The maximum payout for achievement of the risk objectives is 100%, although the compensation committee may determine that the objective has been achieved at a level below 100%.

Set forth below are the relative percentage weights of the 2022 performance metrics, the threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance metric and 2022 performance results. In February 2022, our compensation committee set the target levels for Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS targets for the 2022 incentives based on our 2022 financial plan, reflecting the committee’s commitment to using rigorous goals that incentivize and reward continued growth in these important measures. In February 2023, after consideration of the impact of the proposed ICE Merger on the achievement of the financial performance metrics under the annual incentive plan (as permitted by the Merger Agreement), including $7.7 million of Adjusted revenues, $11.7 million of Adjusted EBITDA, $0.09 of Adjusted EPS and $15.7 million of Sales ACV, the committee determined to make adjustments to the achievement of the performance results to account for the impact of the pending ICE Merger. For information on the ranges of possible annual incentive payments, see “—Grants of Plan Based Awards” under the column “Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards.” Dollar amounts are in millions.


Performance Metric Weight  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Performance
Result
Under Plan1
  Payout
Factor
Under Plan2
  Performance
Result after
Adjustment
for Impact
of ICE
Merger3
  Payout
Factor after
Adjustment
for Impact
of ICE
Merger2
 
Adjusted Revenues  20% $1,570.0  $1,602.0  $1,618.0  $1,577.1   61% $1,584.8   73%
Adjusted EBITDA  20% $768.6  $794.0  $806.7  $758.0   0% $769.7   52%
Adjusted EPS  20% $2.56  $2.68  $2.74  $2.46   0% $2.55   0%
Sales ACV  30% $112.5  $125.0  $137.5  $123.3   93% $139.0   200%
Strategic Risk Management Objectives4  10%           Achieved   100%      100%

1.Includes $25.2 million of Adjusted revenues, $22.7 million of Adjusted EBITDA, and $0.11 of Adjusted EPS related to legislative and market effect on origination and default volumes, as permitted under the 2022 annual incentive plan.

2.Payout factor reflects a target payout at 100% of the executives target incentive and a maximum payout of 200% of executive’s target incentive, except for Mr. Jabbour whose maximum payout is 300% of his target incentive.

3.In addition to the adjustments described in footnote 1 above, includes $7.7 million of Adjusted revenues, $11.7 million of Adjusted EBITDA, $0.09 of Adjusted EPS and $15.7 million of Sales ACV related to the estimated impact of the ICE Merger.
4.The compensation committee determined that the Company had achieved its risk management objectives based upon a report provided by our risk committee on the management of the Company’s overall risk profile and various risk-related achievements in 2022.

The increasetable below shows each named executive officer’s 2022 target incentive opportunity, and the annual incentive amounts actually paid with respect to 2022 performance and following adjustment for the impact of the ICE Merger. Performance was achieved at 50.2% of each executive’s target incentive opportunity under the annual incentive plan, and at 95.1% of Messrs. Nackashi’s, Larsen’s and Gravelle’s respective target incentive opportunities and 125.1% of Mr. Jabbour’s target incentive opportunity in Depreciationeach case following adjustment for the impact of the pending ICE Merger. Ms. Meyers’ 2022 annual incentive bonus was forfeited due to her departing the Company on March 12, 2022.

Name 

2022

Base
Salary

  

2022
Annual

Incentive
Target

  2022
Incentive
Pay Target
  Performance
Multiplier
Under Plan
  2022 Total
Incentive
Earned
Under Plan
  Performance
Multiplier
after
Adjustment
for Impact
of ICE
Merger
  2022 Total
Incentive
Earned
after
Adjustment
for Impact
of ICE
Merger
 
Anthony M. Jabbour $600,000   200% $1,200,000   50.2% $602,145   125.1% $1,500,602 
Joseph M. Nackashi $750,000   200% $1,500,000   50.2% $752,681   95.1% $1,425,753 
Kirk T. Larsen $575,000   150% $862,500   50.2% $432,792   95.1% $819,808 
Michael L. Gravelle $148,000   100% $148,000   50.2% $74,265   95.1% $140,674 
Michele M. Meyers $270,000   50% $135,000             

On December 20, 2022, to mitigate the potential impact of Sections 280G and amortization4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the compensation committee determined that the each of Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle would receive a 2022 annual cash incentive award equal to 75.0% of his target incentive opportunity, with such payment to be made no later than December 30, 2022. Subsequently, in February 2023, after consideration of the Company’s achievement of the performance metric objectives under the annual incentive plan, including adjustments for the impact of the pending ICE Merger, the Committee determined to that each executive would receive a supplemental annual cash incentive award equal to the difference between 95.1% (125.1% for Mr. Jabbour) of the executive’s target incentive opportunity and the 75% of the target incentive opportunity paid in December 2022.


Long-term Equity Incentives

Performance-based Restricted Stock

We typically approve our long-term equity incentive awards during the first quarter as the compensation committee sets our compensation strategy for the year. In March 2022, we used the Omnibus Incentive Plan to grant long-term incentive awards to our executive officers in the form of performance-based restricted stock, with both performance and service vesting requirements. The performance-based awards granted in 2022 comparedvest over three years based on continued employment with us. The performance vesting requirements must be met before the time-based vesting would apply.

For the performance-based vesting requirements, in response to 2021 is primarily relatedfeedback received from our shareholders in 2019, our compensation committee determined to higher software amortizationinclude three annual performance periods for the 2022 performance-based restricted stock awards. The first 1/3 of $11.8 million related to investments in internally developed software, primarily related to our origination software solutions, higher deferred contract costs amortizationthe award would vest only if the Company achieved Adjusted EBITDA of $10.8 million, including $5.9 million of accelerated amortization, partially offset by lower other intangibles assets amortization of $16.0 million, primarily related to acquired client relationship assets that are amortized using an accelerated method.

Transition and Integration Costs

Transition and integration costs were $31.8at least $724.2 million in 2022 compared(which was the 2021 Adjusted EBITDA); the second 1/3 of the award will vest only if the Company achieves Adjusted EBITDA in 2023 at least equal to $13.3the Adjusted EBITDA achieved in 2022; and the third 1/3 will vest only if the Company achieves Adjusted EBITDA in 2024 at least equal to the Adjusted EBITDA achieved in 2023. If we do not achieve the performance metric in any year, the portion of the award that was subject to achievement of that metric will be forfeited. In other words, there is no “catch-up” to allow a portion of an award to vest in a subsequent year if we fail to achieve the performance metric applicable to that year. We achieved Adjusted EBITDA of $758.0 million in 2021. Transitionfor the fiscal year 2022 performance period, including adjustments to exclude the negative effect of budgeted origination, foreclosure and integration costsbankruptcy volumes that were higher than actual volumes during 2022. For the time-based vesting requirements, 1/3 would vest per year and shall vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the Company’s achievement of the applicable adjusted EBITDA targets.

For 2022, Mr. Gravelle’s 2022 long-term incentive award was increased from $675,000 to $750,000. Ms. Meyers did not receive a long-term incentive award in 2022 primarily consisted of costs relateddue to her departing the Company on March 12, 2022.

In setting the performance target for our long-term incentive awards, our compensation committee seeks to set a goal for our executives that requires them to achieve results that are better than the prior year. However, due to the ICE Transaction. Transitionimportance of these awards in the retention of our executives and integration coststhe design of our long-term incentives so that the entire award is forfeited if the performance target is not achieved, the committee does not set the performance target at a level that it considers to be a stretch for our executives. The committee’s approach in 2022this respect is different than its approach in setting the goals for our annual cash-based incentive, where the committee sets the minimum, target and 2021maximum performance targets at levels that are intended to drive superior performance by our executives. Furthermore, after the restricted shares have vested and if those shares have not otherwise satisfied the executive stock ownership guidelines, Section 16 officers are required to hold 50% of the vested shares for 6 months.

The awards were designed with a primary objective of creating a long-term retention incentive, the value of which is tied to our stock price performance, and a secondary objective of requiring that management achieve Adjusted EBITDA results during each year of the award that are equal to or better than the prior year performance.

We selected Adjusted EBITDA because it is one of the most important measures in evaluating the combination of growth and operational efficiency. It also consisted of costs associated with acquisitions, including costs pursuantreflects our ability to purchase agreementsconvert revenue into operating profits for shareholders and expense reduction initiatives.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net consists primarily of interest expenseour progress toward achieving our long-term strategy. It is a key measure used by investors and has a significant effect on our borrowings, payments onlong-term stock price. For our interest rate swaps, amortization of our debt issuance costs and original issue discount, commitment fees on our revolving credit facility and administrative agent fees net of capitalized interest and interest income.

Interest expense, net was $100.6 million in 2022 compared to $83.6 million in 2021, an increase of $17.0 million, or 20%. The increase was driven by higher interest rates and higher average outstanding debt balances.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net was $11.9 million in 2022 compared to $6.4 million in 2021. The 2022 amountperformance-based restricted stock, Adjusted EBITDA is primarily related to legal fees. The 2021 amount is primarily related to legal fees and the debt refinancing.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $22.4 million in 2022 compared to $35.7 million in 2021. Our effective tax rate was 13.5% in 2022 compared to 16.8% in 2021. Refer to Note 18 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementscalculated as noted above under “Annual Performance-based Cash Incentive,” including adjustments for additional information.

46

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates, Net of Tax

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax primarily represents the effect of in-year acquisitions and divestitures and the market and/or legislative effect on origination and foreclosure volumes.


To the extent we were to pay dividends on our investment shares, credit for such dividends would be provided on unvested shares, but payment of those dividends would be subject to the same vesting requirements as the underlying shares—in DNB,other words, if the underlying shares do not vest, the dividends are forfeited. We have not paid any cash dividends to date and have no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

One-Time Restricted Stock Awards

As discussed further below, in connection with the executive leadership transition, on May 16, 2022, our compensation committee approved the grant of supplemental time-based restricted stock awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to each of Messrs. Nackashi and Larsen with grant date fair values of $2,500,000 and $875,000 respectively, in each case with an effective date of grant of May 16, 2022 and 1/3 of which would vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

Impact of ICE Merger on Outstanding Equity

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement with ICE, at the effective time of Closing of the ICE Merger each outstanding Black Knight restricted stock award, including those held by our named executive officers, will be automatically assumed and converted into a restricted stock award of ICE common stock based on the exchange ratio (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and will be subject to the same terms and conditions previously applicable to such Black Knight restricted stock award, except that each “performance restriction” will be deemed satisfied and a change of control will be deemed to have occurred.

Compensation Changes in Connection with Leadership Changes

In May 2022, the Company underwent an executive leadership transition. Mr. Jabbour transitioned from Chairman and CEO to Executive Chairman. In his role as Executive Chairman, Mr. Jabbour focuses on the strategic direction of Black Knight, capital allocation and works with the executive leadership team to extend the Company’s track record of success. Mr. Nackashi transitioned from President to CEO. In his role as CEO, Mr. Nackashi is accountedresponsible for oversight of the execution of our business strategies, including acting with urgency, treating each client like they are our only client, caring for our employees and delivering on our commitments to stakeholders. Mr. Larsen transitioned from CFO to President and CFO. In his expanded role, Mr. Larsen assumed responsibility for the compliance, enterprise risk management, human resources, legal and marketing functions and works closely with Messrs. Jabbour and Nackashi to achieve Black Knight’s strategic goals. Our board determined that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company and will allow our Executive Chairman, CEO, and President and CFO to focus on the responsibilities of their respective offices while creating a collaborative relationship that benefits our Company and stakeholders.

In connection with the foregoing leadership transition, the compensation committee approved several changes to executive compensation, as well as related amendments to our named executive officers’ employment agreements, which are discussed in more detail below.

For Messrs. Nackashi and Larsen, the compensation committee approved changes to their minimum base salaries and target annual incentive opportunities, as well as supplemental time-based restricted stock awards under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. The changes to Messrs. Nackashi’s and Larsen’s base salaries and target annual incentive opportunities and the supplement restricted stock awards were approved following discussion with the compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant in consideration of Messrs. Nackashi’s and Larsen’s total compensation levels relative to their respective experience, duties and responsibilities in their new roles, as well as peer and market data.

In consideration of his new role as CEO, Mr. Nackashi’s base salary increased from $600,000 to $750,000, his target long-term incentive opportunity increased from 150% to 200% of his base salary, with a maximum payout of 400%, and he received a supplemental restricted stock grant with a grant date value of $2,500,000. In connection with his expanded role as President and CFO, Mr. Larsen’s base salary increased from $450,000 to $575,000, his target long-term incentive opportunity increased from 100% to 150%, and he received a supplemental time-based restricted stock award with a grant date value of $875,000. One-third (1/3) of Messrs. Nackashi’s and Larsen’s supplemental time-based restricted stock awards vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, and they are otherwise subject to similar terms and conditions as our annual performance-based restricted stock awards.

22

Payments in Connection with ICE Merger

In connection with the entry into the Merger Agreement with ICE and consistent with the terms of Mr. Jabbour’s employment agreement, dated as of April 1, 2018 and as amended as of May 16, 2022, the compensation committee determined to award Mr. Jabbour a discretionary bonus of $40,000,000 contingent upon the closing of the ICE Merger (the Discretionary Bonus). The Discretionary Bonus was paid after consideration of Mr. Jabbour’s significant contributions to the Company and the critical role he plays in our organization in shaping and providing continuity with respect to the Company’s strategic vision. For the last several years, Mr. Jabbour has led the execution of our strategic vision, including organically growing our software, data and analytics businesses with urgency through selling our products to new clients, cross-selling additional services to existing clients, and innovating through the development of new solutions and refining our current offerings to provide better insight to our clients, and selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions, while maintaining an equity-method investment. Equityefficient cost structure to create the most value for our shareholders. In 2022, Mr. Jabbour played significant role in earningsthe negotiation of unconsolidated affiliates, netthe ICE Merger, the value of which represents a 27% premium to our stock price on March 3, 2023 and a 27% premium to our stock price on April 4, 2022, the last date before the publication of news reports relating to a potential acquisition of Black Knight (in each case based upon a merger consideration value of $75 per share).

In December 2022, in connection with certain tax-planning actions to mitigate the potential impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on Mr. Jabbour and Black Knight, the compensation committee determined that such bonus would be paid to Mr. Jabbour no later than December 28, 2022, rather than upon closing of the ICE Merger, but would be contingent upon successful consummation of the ICE Merger. In furtherance of the early payment of the Discretionary Bonus, the Company and Mr. Jabbour entered into a letter agreement that provides that if Mr. Jabbour is terminated by the Company for cause or Mr. Jabbour resigns his employment without good reason, in each case prior to consummation of the ICE Merger, or if the Merger Agreement is terminated without the consummation of the ICE Merger, he will be required to pay liquidated damages to Black Knight equal to the value of the after-tax proceeds of the Discretionary Bonus that would not have ultimately been paid absent the tax-planning actions described above (plus any tax refund he receives in respect of such payment), which amount will be deposited in an escrow account established by Mr. Jabbour as security for the liquidated damages.

In addition, on December 20, 2022, to further mitigate the potential impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on the applicable executive and Black Knight, the compensation committee determined that the outstanding equity awards granted to Mr. Jabbour that would otherwise have vested in the first quarter of 2023 would accelerate and vest, which were vested on December 20, 2022. The compensation committee further determined that each of Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle would receive a 2022 annual cash incentive award equal to 75.0% of his target incentive opportunity, with such payment to be made no later than December 30, 2022. For additional information concerning payments with respect to the 2022 annual cash incentive plan, see the section title “Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive.”

23

We Promote Long-term Stock Ownership for our Executives

We have formal stock ownership guidelines for all corporate officers, including our named executive officers and members of our board of directors. The guidelines were established to encourage such individuals to hold a multiple of their base salary (or annual retainer) in our common stock and thereby align a significant portion of their own economic interests with those of our shareholders. Further, the award agreements for our 2022 restricted stock awards provide that our executives who do not hold shares of our stock with a value sufficient to satisfy the applicable stock ownership guidelines must retain 50% of the shares acquired as a result of the lapse of vesting restrictions (excluding shares withheld in satisfaction of tax consistswithholding obligations) until the executive satisfies the applicable stock ownership guideline. The ownership levels are shown in the “Security Ownership of Management and Directors” table below. The guidelines call for the following (in millions):executive or director to reach the ownership multiple within four years. Shares of restricted stock count toward meeting the guidelines. The guidelines, including those applicable to non-employee directors, are as follows:

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

$

1.3

$

(7.3)

Gain related to DNB investment, net of tax

305.4

Non-cash gain related to DNB's issuance of common stock, net of tax

 

 

9.9

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

$

306.7

$

2.6

PositionMinimum Aggregate Value
Chairman of the Board7 × annual base salary
Chief Executive Officer7 × base salary
Other Executive Officers2 × base salary
Members of the Board5 × annual cash retainer

Refer to Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related toOur named executive officers and our investmentboard of directors maintain significant long-term investments in DNB.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Requirements

Our primary sources of liquidity are our existing cash balances, cash flows from operations and borrowings on our revolving credit facility.Company. As of December 31, 2022, each of our named executive officers and non-employee directors holdings of our stock significantly exceeded these stock ownership guidelines, other than Ms. Shanik who joined out board in December 2019 and Ms. Burke who joined our board in October 2020. Collectively, as reported in the table “Security Ownership of Management and Directors,” our named executive officers and directors beneficially own an aggregate of 2.1 million shares of our common stock as of March 13, 2023, which represents 1.3% of our outstanding common stock with a value of approximately $117.2 million based on the closing price of our common stock of $55.71 on that date. The fact that our executives and directors hold such a large investment in our shares is part of our culture and our compensation philosophy. Management’s sizable investment in our shares aligns their economic interests directly with the interests of our shareholders, and their wealth will rise and fall as our share price rises and falls. This promotes teamwork among our management team and strengthens the team’s focus on achieving long-term results and increasing shareholder return.

Benefit Plans

We provide retirement and other benefits to our U.S. employees under a number of compensation and benefit plans. Our named executive officers generally participate in the same compensation and benefit plans as our other executives and employees. In addition, our named executive officers are eligible to participate in broad-based health and welfare plans. We do not offer pensions or supplemental executive retirement plans for our named executive officers.

401(k) Plan. Our domestic employees, including our named executive officers, have the opportunity to participate in the Black Knight 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, or 401(k) Plan, our defined contribution savings plan that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Our 401(k) Plan contains a cash or deferred arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating employees can contribute up to 75% of their eligible compensation, but not more than statutory limits, generally $20,500 in 2022.

A participant could receive the value of his or her vested account balance upon termination of employment. A participant is always 100% vested in his or her voluntary contributions. Vesting in matching contributions, if any, occurs proportionally each year over the first three years based on continued employment.

24

Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We maintained an employee stock purchase plan, or ESPP, through which our executives and employees can purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions and through matching employer contributions. Participants in the ESPP could deduct up to 15% of their after-tax base pay. At the end of each calendar quarter, we would make a matching contribution to the account of each participant who has been continuously employed by us or a participating subsidiary for the last four calendar quarters if the participant has held the shares purchased in the quarter to which the matching contribution relates for at least one year. For those employees with 10 or more years of service or who were at the employee “Director” level or above, including our named executive officers, matching contributions were equal to 1/2 of the amount contributed during the quarter that is one year earlier than the quarter in which the matching contribution was made. The matching contributions, together with the employee deferrals, were used to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market.

For information regarding the matching contributions made to our named executive officers in 2022, see “—Summary Compensation Table” under the column “All Other Compensation” and the related footnote.

Health and Welfare Benefits. We sponsor various broad-based health and welfare benefit plans for our employees. We provide all our employees, including our named executive officers, with basic life insurance and the option for additional life insurance. The taxable portion of the premiums on this additional life insurance for our named executive officers is reflected under “—Summary Compensation Table” under the column “All Other Compensation” and related footnote.

Other Benefits. We provide few perquisites to our executives. In general, the perquisites provided are intended to help our executives be more productive and efficient and to protect us and the executive from certain business risks and potential threats. For example, our audit committee has adopted a policy that requires our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer to travel on the corporate aircraft whenever possible for safety reasons. The compensation committee regularly reviews the perquisites provided to our executive officers. Further detail regarding executive perquisites in 2022 can be found in the “— Summary Compensation Table” under the column “All Other Compensation” and the related footnote.

Employment and Other Agreements and Post-Termination Compensation and Benefits

We are party to employment agreements with our named executive officers. These agreements provide us and the named executive officers with certain rights and obligations following a termination of employment. We believe these agreements are necessary to protect our legitimate business interests, as well as to protect the named executive officers in the event of certain termination events. For a discussion of the material terms of these agreements, see the narrative following “—Grants of Plan Based Awards” and “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and Executive Officers

Our compensation committee is responsible for reviewing, approving and monitoring all compensation programs for our named executive officers. Our compensation committee is also responsible for administering our annual cash incentives, our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Optimal Blue 2020 Incentive Plan and approving individual grants and awards under those plans for our named executive officers.

In connection with our 2022 executive compensation programs, Mercer, as independent compensation consultant to our compensation committee, conducted an annual review of our compensation programs for our named executive officers and other key executives and our board of directors. Mercer was selected, and its fees and terms of engagement were approved, by our compensation committee in 2022. Mercer reports directly to the compensation committee and receives compensation only for services related to executive compensation issues. During 2022, the Company also engaged Mercer’s Health & Benefits business to provide consulting support in conjunction with Mercer’s role as broker of record for selected employee benefits and paid Mercer $292,431 in connection with such services. In April 2022, the compensation committee reviewed the independence of Mercer in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange regarding the independence of consultants to the compensation committee and affirmed the consultant’s independence and that no conflicts of interest existed.

25

In February 2022, our then Chief Executive Officer Mr. Jabbour made recommendations with respect to his direct reports. In addition, Colleen Haley, our Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary, coordinated with our compensation committee members and Mercer in preparing the committee’s meeting agendas and, at the direction of the committee, assisted Mercer in gathering our financial information and information on our executives’ existing compensation arrangements for inclusion in their reports to our compensation committee. Our executive officers do not make recommendations to our compensation committee with respect to their own compensation.

While our compensation committee carefully considers the information provided by, and the recommendations of, its independent compensation consultant and the individuals who participate in the compensation process, our compensation committee retains complete discretion to accept, reject or modify any compensation recommendations.

Establishing Executive Compensation Levels

We operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with our peers and competitors to attract and retain highly skilled executives within that industry. To attract and retain talented executives with the leadership abilities and skills necessary for building long-term value, motivate our executives to perform at a high level and reward outstanding achievement, our executives’ compensation levels are set at levels that our compensation committee believes to be appropriate and competitive based upon the considerations and factors described in this section.

When determining the amount of the various compensation components that each of our named executive officers would receive, our compensation committee considered a number of important qualitative and quantitative factors including:

·A strong focus on acquiring and retaining our clients and increasing shareholder value;

·The named executive officer’s experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility and potential to influence our Company’s performance;

·Business environment and our business objectives and strategy;

·The named executive officer’s ability to impact the Company’s achievement of the goals for which the compensation program was designed, including achieving the Company’s long-term financial goals and increasing shareholder value;

·Market compensation data provided by the compensation committee’s compensation consultant, with a focus on the 25th, 50th to 75th percentiles; and

·Other corporate governance and regulatory factors related to executive compensation, including discouraging our named executive officers from taking unnecessary risks.

Our compensation decisions are not formulaic, and the members of our compensation committee did not assign precise weights to the factors listed above. Our compensation committee utilized their individual and collective business judgment to review, assess and approve compensation for our named executive officers.

26

To assist our compensation committee, Mercer conducts marketplace reviews of the compensation we pay to our executive officers. It gathers marketplace compensation data on total compensation, which consists of annual salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, executive benefits, executive ownership levels, overhang and dilution from our Omnibus Incentive Plan, compensation levels as a percent of revenue, pay mix and other key statistics. This data is collected and analyzed twice during the year, once in the first quarter and again in the fourth quarter. The marketplace compensation data provides a point of reference for our compensation committee, but our compensation committee ultimately makes subjective compensation decisions based on all the factors described above.

For 2022, Mercer used two marketplace data sources: (1) general industry companies with revenues between $500 million and $3 billion and (2) compensation information for a group of companies, or the peer group. The primary factors used to select the peer group were revenue (with peer group companies’ revenue ranging from approximately 1.13 billion to 3.4 billion, compared to our projected 2022 revenue that at that time was estimated to be approximately $1.56 billion), market capitalization, EBITDA, industry focus, nature and complexity of operations, and competition for business and executive talent.

In addition to the compensation surveys, Mercer gathers compensation practices data from independent sources. That data is helpful to the compensation committee when reviewing our executive compensation practices.

The compensation committee reviewed and determined the Company’s peer group in October 2021 for purposes of 2022 compensation research. Companies may be removed from the peer group for reasons such as mergers and acquisitions, “going private” transactions, a material change in the business focus of a peer, or other reasons that materially change the business or results of a peer. Companies may be added to the peer group for reasons such as revenue growth (organic or due to merger or acquisition), an initial public offering, a change in business focus, or based upon our review of competitor peer groups. For the 2022 peer group, Mercer did not recommend any changes. The 2022 peer group consisted of the following 14 companies:

Verisk Analytics, Inc.ANSYS, Inc.
TransunionCoStar Group, Inc.
Envestnet, Inc.Fair Isaac Corporation
Paycom Software, Inc.PTC Inc.
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.Tyler Technologies, Inc.
WEX Inc.Ceridian HCM Holding, Inc.
MSCI Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.

In setting 2022 target compensation levels for our named executive officers, the compensation committee primarily focused on the 50th percentile of the market. In considering our compensation mix, the committee determined to set a high level of variable pay to provide our executives with the opportunity to achieve pay levels at the 75th percentile (or higher) for superior financial performance.

The marketplace compensation information in this discussion is not deemed filed or a part of this compensation discussion and analysis for certification purposes.

Hedging and Pledging Policy

In order to more closely align the interests of our directors and executive officers with those of our shareholders and to protect against inappropriate risk taking, we maintain a hedging and pledging policy, which prohibits our executive officers and directors from taking any of the following actions without obtaining approval from our board of directors: engaging in hedging or monetization transactions with respect to our securities, engaging in short-term or speculative transactions in our securities that could create heightened legal risk and/or the appearance of improper or inappropriate conduct or holding Black Knight securities in margin accounts or pledging them as collateral for loans.

27

Clawback Policy

We have a policy to clawback and recover incentive-based compensation paid to our executive officers if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements. Under the policy, in the event of such a restatement we will clawback any incentive-based compensation paid during the preceding three-year period to the extent it would have been lower had the compensation been based on the restated financial results. No clawbacks were made in 2022. We intend our policy to comply with the NYSE listing rules regarding recoupment of incentive compensation when those rules become effective.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Our compensation committee considers the impact of tax and accounting treatment when determining executive compensation.

In general, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount that can be deducted in any one year for compensation paid to certain executive officers. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer serving at any time during the taxable year, its three other most highly compensated executive officers employed at the end of the taxable year and any employee who was covered under Section 162(m) for any earlier tax year that began after December 31, 2016 will be covered by Section 162(m). While our compensation committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the compensation committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions, as noted above, and retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the awards are not deductible for tax purposes.

Our compensation committee also considers the accounting impact when structuring and approving awards. We account for share-based payments in accordance with ASC Topic 718, which governs the appropriate accounting treatment of share-based payments under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

2022 Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation

At our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, we held a non-binding advisory vote, also called a “say-on-pay” vote, on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the 2022 proxy statement. A substantial majority of our shareholders approved our “say-on-pay” proposal, with 93% of the votes cast in favor of the proposal. The compensation committee considered these results, as well as the feedback we received from investors prior to and following our 2022 annual meeting. For a description of the feedback we received from investors, see the section above titled “2022 Shareholder Engagement.”

Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management, and the compensation committee recommended to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Thomas M. Hagerty (Chair)

David K. Hunt

28

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table contains information concerning the cash and non-cash compensation awarded to or earned by our named executive officers for the years indicated.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation awarded to, earned by or paid for the year ended December 31, 2022 to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2022.

Name and
Principal Position1
  Fiscal
Year
  Salary ($)2  

 

Bonus ($)3

  Stock
Awards ($)4
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)5
  All Other
Compensation
($)6
  Total ($) 
Anthony M. Jabbour
Executive Chairman 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2022
2021
2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
600,000
600,000
600,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40,898,457
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,500,015
7,500,060
13,129,954
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
602,145
3,244,286
2,268,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
574,634
218,210
63,481
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50,175,251
11,562,556
16,061,435
 
 
 
Joseph M. Nackashi
Chief Executive Officer 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2022
2021
2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
694,521
600,000
600,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
673,072
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,000,097
3,500,028
6,200,674
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
752,681
1,666,607
1,251,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
224,949
95,910
51,800
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8,345,320
5,862,545
8,103,474
 
 
 
Kirk T. Larsen
President and Chief Financial Officer 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2022
2021
2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
528,767
450,000
450,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
387,016
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,875,069
3,000,024
4,803,329
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432,792
833,304
625,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
79,484
138,232
33,548
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,303,128
4,421,560
5,911,877
 
 
 
Michael L. Gravelle
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
 
 
 
 
 
 
2022
2021
2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
148,000
148,000
148,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
66,409
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
750,030
675,032
675,014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
74,265
274,064
206,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11,100
11,214
11,487
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,049,804
1,108,310
1,040,501
 
 
 
Michele M. Meyers
Former Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer7

 
 
 
2022
2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
57,115
267,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
-
425,068
 
 
 
 
 
 
-
249,992
 
 
 
 
 
 
8,837
26,329
 
 
 
 
 
 
65,952
968,889
 
 

1.

Mr. Nackashi served as CEO beginning in May 2022. Our former CEO, Mr. Jabbour, became Executive Chairman in May 2022.

2.

Amounts are not reduced to reflect the named executive officers’ elections, if any, to defer receipt of salary under our ESPP, or under our 401(k) plan.

3.

Amounts include the amounts paid as annual performance-based cash incentives to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle with respect to adjustments made to the performance results to account for the impact of the pending ICE Merger. With respect to Mr. Jabbour, the amount also includes the Discretionary Bonus paid with respect to the ICE Merger, which was paid in 2022 to mitigate the impact of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code following closing of the ICE Merger. The after-tax proceeds of the Discretionary Bonus are held by Mr. Jabbour in an escrow account and will be paid to the Company as liquidated damages (together with any tax refund he receives in respect of such payment) in the event that he is terminated for Cause or voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company prior to closing of the ICE Merger or in the event the Merger Agreement is terminated without consummation of the ICE Merger.

4.Represents the grant date fair value of performance-based restricted stock awards granted on March 10, 2022 based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions for performance-based awards. Also represents the grant date fair value of time-based restricted stock awards granted on May 16, 2022 to Messrs. Nackashi and Larsen. For Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle, 2021 and 2020 amounts include the grant date fair value of performance-based restricted stock awards granted on March 10, 2021 and February 18, 2020, respectively. For Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen, 2020 amounts also reflects the grant date fair value of the Optimal Blue profits interest awards. All amounts are computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, excluding forfeiture assumptions. See the Grants of Plan Based Awards table for details regarding the awards. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Footnote 16 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2023. Ms. Meyers did not receive a any restricted stock awards in 2022 due to her departing the Company on March 12, 2022.

29

5.Amounts shown for 2022 represent performance-based amounts earned as annual cash incentives. Amounts shown for 2022 reflect a performance multiplier of 50.2% for Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle. Ms. Meyers did not receive a 2022 annual cash incentive due to her departing the Company on March 12, 2022.

6.Amounts shown for 2022 include matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan and ESPP; life insurance premiums paid by us; personal use of corporate aircraft; employer contributions to a health savings account and accrued vacation payout. The amount of incremental cost for personal aircraft usage is determined by calculating the hourly variable costs (i.e., fuel, catering, aircraft maintenance, landing and parking fees, crew costs and other miscellaneous costs) for the aircraft, and then multiplying the result by the hours flown for personal use during the year.

2022 Jabbour ($)  Nackashi ($)  Larsen ($)  Gravelle ($)  Meyers($) 
401(k) Matching Contributions  6,863   5,265   6,173   -   195 
ESPP Matching Contributions  45,000   45,000   27,000   11,100   4,500 
Life Insurance Premiums  387   387   207   -   21 
Personal Airplane Use  521,584   173,497   45,504   -   - 
HSA contributions  800   800   600   -   123 
Accrued vacation payout  -   -   -   -   3,998 
Total  574,634   224,949   79,484   11,100   8,837 

7.Ms. Meyers voluntarily terminated her employment with the Company on March 12, 2022. As a result, she did not receive any stock awards or an annual cash incentive for 2022 and she forfeited all unvested portions of outstanding equity awards, including the unvested portion of her March 10, 2021 performance-based restricted stock award, upon her termination.

30

Grants of Plan Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning awards granted to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. Michele M. Meyers did not participate in the annual cash incentive plan or receive a 2022 restricted stock award due to her departing the Company on March 12, 2022.

      Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non Equity Incentive Plan Awards1
  (g)
Estimated
Future
  (h)    
(a)
Name
 (b)
Grant Date
 (c)
Award Type
 (d)
Threshold ($)
  (e)
Target ($)
  (f)
Maximum ($)
  Payments
under
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Target
(#)2
  All
other
stock
awards:
Number
of
Shares
(#)
  (i)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Restricted
Stock
Awards
($)3,4
 
Anthony M. Jabbour N/A Annual Incentive Plan  600,000   1,200,000   3,600,000          
 3/10/22 Performance-Based Restricted Stock           131,165      7,500,015 
Joseph M. Nackashi N/A Annual Incentive Plan  750,000   1,500,000   3,000,000          
 3/10/22 Performance-Based Restricted Stock           61,211      3,500,045 
 5/16/22 Time-Based Restricted Stock              35,761   2,500,052 
Kirk T. Larsen   N/A Annual Incentive Plan  431,250   862,500   1,725,000          
 3/10/22 Performance-Based Restricted Stock           52,466      3,000,006 
 5/16/22 Time-Based Restricted Stock              12,517   875,063 
Michael L. Gravelle   N/A Annual Incentive Plan  74,000   148,000   296,000          
 3/10/22 Performance-Based Restricted Stock           13,117      750,030 

1.Amounts reflect potential annual incentive payments for fiscal year 2022. The amounts shown in the Threshold column reflect the amount payable if the threshold level of performance is achieved, which is 50% of the target amount shown in the Target column. The amount shown in the Maximum column is 300% of such target amount for Mr. Jabbour and 200% for Messrs. Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle. Target annual incentive amounts, as a percentage of base salary, for each of our named executive officers are as follows: Mr. Jabbour 200%, Mr. Nackashi 200%, Mr. Larsen 150%, and Mr. Gravelle 100%.

2.The amounts shown as performance-based restricted stock in column (g) represent the number of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted on March 10, 2022 for each executive under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, which are subject to (1) time-based vesting over three years based on continued employment, and (2) our meeting an Adjusted EBITDA goal in each of 2022, 2023 and 2024 in order for the 1/3 scheduled to vest in 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, to vest.

3.Represents the grant date fair value of time-based restricted stock awards based upon a $69.91 per share grant date fair value for the awards granted on May 16, 2022.

4.Represents the grant date fair value of time-based restricted stock awards based upon a $57.18 per share grant date fair value for the awards granted on March 10, 2022.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers on December 31, 2022. Ms. Meyers forfeited all outstanding equity awards upon her departures from the Company and therefore does not have any outstanding equity awards at year-end.

Name Grant
Date1,2,3
  Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
that Have Not
Vested ($)4
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares That
Have Not
Vested (#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Value
of Unearned
Shares That
Have Not
Vested
($)4
 
Anthony M. Jabbour   3/10/2021         32,895   2,031,266 
 3/10/2022         87,443   5,399,605 
Joseph M. Nackashi 2/18/2020         15,574   961,695 
 3/10/2021         30,702   1,895,849 
 3/10/2022         61,211   3,779,779 
 5/16/2022   35,761   2,208,242       
Kirk T. Larsen 2/18/2020         13,349   824,301 
 3/10/2021         26,316   1,625,013 
 3/10/2022         52,466   3,239,776 
 5/16/2022   12,517   772,925       
Michael L. Gravelle   2/18/2020         3,003   185,435 
 3/10/2021         5,921   365,622 
 3/10/2022         13,117   809,975 

1.With respect to restricted stock awards granted on February 18, 2020, the awards vest over three years, subject to (i) our achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $583.4 million for the period of January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 (Adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for purposes of the awards, of $588.6 million was achieved for this period); our achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $609.9 million for the period January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for the second 1/3 of the award to vest (Adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for purposes of the awards, of $708.5 million was achieved for this period); and our achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $724.2 for the period January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 for final the 1/3 of the award to vest (Adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for purposes of the awards, of $758.0 million was achieved for this period); and (ii) the continued service of the award holder.

2.With respect to restricted stock awards granted on March 10, 2021, the awards vest over three years, subject to (i) our achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $609.9 million for the period January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for the first 1/3 of the award to vest (Adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for purposes of the awards, of $708.5 million was achieved for this period); our achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $724.2 million for the period January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 for the second 1/3 of the award to vest (Adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for purposes of the awards, of $758.0 million was achieved for this period); and our achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA goal in 2023 for final the 1/3 of the award scheduled to vest in 2024; and (ii) the continued service of the award holder.

3.With respect to restricted stock awards granted on March 10, 2022, the awards vest over three years, subject to (i) our achievement of Adjusted EBITDA of $724.2 million for the period January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 for the first 1/3 of the award to vest (Adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for purposes of the awards, of $758.0 million was achieved for this period), and our achievement of an Adjusted EBITDA goal in 2023 and 2024 for the second and third 1/3’s of the award scheduled to vest in 2024 and 2025, respectively; and (ii) the continued service of the award holder.
4.Market values are based on the December 30, 2022 closing price for our common stock of $61.75 per share.

Outstanding Optimal Blue Profits Interest Awards at Fiscal Year-End

Due to the strategic importance of the successful execution of our growth strategy for Optimal Blue, the compensation committee determined it was important that the interests of our executives with the most ability to impact our execution of that strategy be tied directly to the growth of Optimal Blue. In November 2020, in order to create a strong link between our executives’ interests and Optimal Blue’s long-term performance and growth, the committee granted equity incentives known as profits interests in Optimal Blue to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen. No profits interests were granted to our named executive officers in 2021 or 2022.

32

The profits interest awards are in the form of restricted Class B units of Optimal Blue. Optimal Blue is organized as a limited liability company and is taxed as a partnership under U.S. federal income tax laws. The Class B units are intended to qualify as profits interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The profits interests are equity interests in Optimal Blue but have value only following achievement of a specified equity threshold, or hurdle amount. The hurdle amount equals the value of the Optimal Blue on the date the awards are granted. Due to the proximity of the grants of profits interest awards to the closing of our acquisition of Optimal Blue in September 2020, the hurdle amount for the Optimal Blue profits interests granted to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen is $1.445 billion, which is based on the equity value of Optimal Blue at the time of acquisition. Thus, similar to a stock option, the Optimal Blue profits interest awards only have value to the extent the equity value of Optimal Blue increases above $1.445 billion. The committee also linked the Optimal Blue profits interest awards to our retention goals by providing that the profits interests vest 100% on the third anniversary of grant, subject to continued service. The Optimal Blue profits interests are subject to the terms and conditions of the Optimal Blue 2020 Incentive Plan and the limited liability company operating agreement.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding profits interest awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2022.

Name Grant Date Number of Class B
Units That Have Not
Vested (#)1
  Redemption Value
of Units that
Have Not Vested ($)2
 
Anthony M. Jabbour 11/24/2020  1,330   14,681,764 
Joseph M. Nackashi 11/24/2020  638   7,042,831 
Kirk T. Larsen 11/24/2020  426   4,702,580 

1.Optimal Blue profits interests vest 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant.

2.Based on a redemption value as of December 31, 2022 of $11,038.92 per unit, as determined using the fair value method of accounting under GAAP.

Stock Vested

The following table sets forth information concerning each vesting of restricted stock (on an aggregated basis) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 for each of the named executive officers:

  Stock Vested Restricted
Stock Awards
 
Name  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
 
Anthony M. Jabbour  223,988   13,205,243 
Joseph M. Nackashi  53,199   3,169,985 
Kirk T. Larsen  42,418   2,515,312 
Michael L. Gravelle  9,211   544,812 
Michele M. Meyers  5,221   309,438 

As discussed above, on December 20, 2022, to further mitigate the potential impact of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code on the applicable executive and Black Knight, the compensation committee determined to accelerate the settlement and vesting of the outstanding equity awards granted to Mr. Jabbour that would otherwise vest in the first quarter of 2023, which were vested on December 20, 2022.

33

Employment Agreements

In 2022, we were party to employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. The material terms of these agreements are summarized below. Additional information regarding post termination benefits provided under our continuing executive officer’s employment agreements can be found under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below. As described above, in connection with the leadership transition, our compensation committee, approved several changes executive compensation, as well as related amendments to our named executive officers’ employment agreements, including the following:

·For Messrs. Nackashi and Larsen, changes to their minimum base salaries and target annual incentive opportunities, in each case to be consistent with changes to their base salaries and target annual incentive opportunity following discussion with the committee’s independent compensation consultant in consideration of Messrs. Nackashi’s and Larsen’s total compensation levels relative to their respective experience, duties and responsibilities in their new roles, as well as peer and market data.

·For Messrs. Nackashi and Larsen, to increase the lump sum the executive would receive in the event of a termination by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive for “Good Reason”, from 200% to 250% of the executive’s base salary and target annual incentive opportunity in effect for the year in which the date of termination occurs.

·For Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle, amendments to the definition of “Good Reason” to include a material diminution in the executive’s duties or responsibilities upon or within 24 months following a Change in Control of the Company or receipt of notice that the term of the executive’s employment agreement will not be renewed such that the agreement would expire prior to the two-year anniversary of the closing of the ICE Merger, in each case upon or within 24 months after a Change in Control of the Company.

·For Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle, that all outstanding equity awards granted to our executives by the Company or our affiliates will become immediately vested upon a termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive for “Good Reason”.

·For Messrs. Jabbour and Larsen, amended certain non-competition provisions.

For each of our named executive officers their employment agreement provides that, if any payments or benefits to be paid to the executive pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement or otherwise would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then the executive may elect for such payments to be reduced to one dollar less than the amount that would constitute a “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code; and that if the executive does not elect to have such payments so reduced, he or she is responsible for payment of any excise tax resulting from such payments and shall not be entitled to a gross up payment under his employment agreement.

Anthony M. Jabbour

We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Jabbour, effective as of April 1, 2018, to serve as our Chief Executive Officer, with a provision for automatic annual extensions unless either party provides timely notice that the term should not be extended. In light of Mr. Jabbour role as Executive Chairman, we amended Mr. Jabbour’s employment agreement, effective as of May 16, 2022, to reflect his new title and compensation. Mr. Jabbour’s employment agreement provides that he will receive a minimum annual base salary of $600,000 and is eligible for an annual incentive bonus opportunity, with amounts payable depending on performance relative to targeted results. Mr. Jabbour’s target bonus is set at 200% of his base salary, with a maximum of up to 600% of his target bonus.

34

Mr. Jabbour’s employment agreement provides that, in the event the Company is sold during the employment term and/or outperforms its financial projections in any calendar year, he is eligible to receive a discretionary bonus in an amount determined by the compensation committee. Mr. Jabbour is entitled to the benefits we provide to our other employees generally.

Joseph M. Nackashi

In light of Mr. Nackashi’s new role of Chief Executive Officer, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Nackashi’s employment agreement to reflect his new title and compensation, effective March 16, 2022. As amended, the employment agreement provides a provision for automatic annual extensions unless either party provides timely notice that the term should not be extended. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Nackashi’s minimum annual base salary is $750,000, and Mr. Nackashi is eligible for an annual incentive bonus opportunity, with amounts payable depending on performance relative to targeted results. Mr. Nackashi’s target bonus was increased to 200% (from 100%) of his base salary, with a maximum of up to 400% (increased from 200%) of his base salary. Mr. Nackashi is entitled to the benefits we provide to our other employees generally.

Kirk T. Larsen

In light of Mr. Larsen’s new role of President and Chief Financial Officer, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Larsen’s employment agreement effective March 16, 2022. As amended, the employment agreement provides that Mr. Larsen will serve as our Chief Financial Officer for a three-year term, with a provision for automatic annual extensions unless either party provides timely notice that the term should not be extended. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Larsen’s minimum annual base salary was increased $575,000 (from $435,000) and Mr. Larsen is eligible for an annual incentive bonus opportunity, with amounts payable depending on performance relative to targeted results. Mr. Larsen’s target bonus was increased to 150% (from 100%) of his base salary, with a maximum of up to 300% of his base salary. Mr. Larsen is entitled to the benefits we provide to our other employees generally.

Michael L. Gravelle

We entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Gravelle, effective March 1, 2015, as amended on April 30, 2016, November 1, 2019, and May 16, 2022 to serve as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The agreement provides for a three-year term with automatic annual extensions unless either party provides timely notice that the term should not be extended. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Gravelle is eligible for an annual incentive bonus opportunity, with amounts payable depending on performance relative to targeted results. Mr. Gravelle’s target bonus is set at 100% of his base salary, with a maximum of up to 200% of his base salary. Mr. Gravelle is entitled to the benefits we provide to our other employees generally.

Michele M. Meyers

From March 1, 2021 until March 12, 2022, we were party to a severance agreement with Ms. Meyers. Under the terms of the agreement, Ms. Meyers’ minimum annual base salary was $260,000 and Ms. Meyers was eligible for a target annual incentive opportunity equal to 50% of her base salary, with the amount to be paid under the annual incentive opportunity to be determined in the discretion of the compensation committee or the Chief Executive Officer.

35

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

In this section, we discuss the nature and estimated value of payments and benefits we would provide to our named executive officers in the event of termination of employment or a change of control. The amounts described in this section reflect amounts that would have been payable under (i) our plans, and (ii) where applicable with respect to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle, their employment agreements, if their employment had terminated on December 31, 2022. We do not provide any information in this section regarding amounts payable to Ms. Meyers because she voluntarily terminated her employment with the Company on March 12, 2022 and did not receive any cash payments or accelerated vesting with respect to her outstanding equity awards in connection with her termination.

The types of termination situations include a voluntary termination by the executive, with or without good reason, a termination by us either for cause or not for cause and termination in the event of disability or death. We also describe the estimated payments and benefits that would be provided upon a change in control without a termination of employment. The actual payments and benefits that would be provided upon a termination of employment would be based on the named executive officers’ compensation and benefit levels at the time of the termination of employment and the value of accelerated vesting of share-based awards would be dependent on the value of the underlying stock.

For any termination of employment, our named executive officers would be entitled to benefits that are available generally to our domestic salaried employees, such as distributions under our 401(k) savings plan, certain disability benefits and accrued vacation. We have not described or provided an estimate of the value of any payments or benefits under plans or arrangements that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of a named executive officer and that are generally available to all salaried employees.

Potential Payments Under Employment or Severance Agreements

As discussed above, we have entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle. The agreements contain provisions for the payment of severance benefits following certain termination events. On May 16, 2022, the compensation committee approved amendments to Messrs. Jabbour’s, Nackashi’s, Larsen’s and Gravelle’s employment agreements in order to reflect the changes to their respective roles, to modify the terms of the “Good Reason” definition, to clarify the treatment of outstanding equity incentive awards, including Class B Units of Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC, in the event of a termination by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive for “Good Reason.” In the cases of Mr. Nackashi and Mr. Larsen, the amended employment agreements also adjusted from 200% to 250% the lump sum payment each of them would receive in the event of a termination by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive for “Good Reason”. Below is a summary of the payments and benefits that Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle would receive in connection with various employment or service termination scenarios on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of our fiscal year end. Ms. Meyers severance agreement terminated in connection with her voluntary termination of employment on March 12, 2022. She did not receive any payments under her severance agreement in connection with her voluntary termination of employment.

36

Termination PaymentWithout
Cause
or by the
Executive
for Good
Reason
Death or
Disability
For Cause
or Without
Good
Reason
Accrued obligations (earned unpaid base salary, annual bonus payments relating to the prior year, and any unpaid expense reimbursements)
Prorated Annual Bonus based on the actual incentive the named executive officer would have earned for the year of termination1X
Lump Sum Payment equal to a percentage, of the sum of the executive’s (a) annual base salary and (b) the target bonus opportunity in the year in which the termination of employment occurs2XX
Right to convert any life insurance provided by us into an individual policy, plus a lump sum cash payment equal to thirty-six months of premiumsXX
COBRA coverage (so long as the executive pays the premiums) for a period of three years or, if earlier, until eligible for comparable benefits from another employer, plus a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of thirty-six monthly COBRA premium payments3XX
Vesting of all stock option, restricted stock and other equity-based incentive awards, including the Optimal Blue Class B unitsX

1.The prorated annual bonus is based on the following:

·In the event of a termination without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, the actual incentive the named executive officer would have earned for the year of termination and the fraction of the year the executive was employed by us.
·In the event of a termination for death or disability, the target annual bonus opportunity in the year in which the termination occurs or the prior year if no target annual bonus opportunity has yet been determined and (b) for Mr. Jabbour, the fraction of the year the executive was employed, and for Messrs. Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle, based on the amount of their respective accrued annual bonuses as contained on the internal books of the Company for the month in which the termination occurs.

2.The percentage for the lump sum payment for each executive is as follows: Mr. Jabbour (250%), Mr. Nackashi (250%), Mr. Larsen (250%) and Mr. Gravelle (200%).

3.Mr. Nackashi’s agreement does not include this provision with respect to a termination without Cause or by Mr. Nackashi for Good Reason.

Definition: Cause. The table below shows the reasons that the Company may terminate each named executive officer’s employment for “Cause.”

Definition of “Cause” includes:JabbourNackashiLarsenGravelle
Persistent failure to perform duties consistent with a commercially reasonable standard of care
Willful neglect of duties
Conviction of, or pleading nolo contendere to, criminal or other illegal activities involving dishonesty or moral turpitude
Material breach of the employment agreement
Impeding or failing to materially cooperate with an investigation authorized by our board of directors
Material breach of the Company’s business policies, accounting practices or standards of ethics
Material breach of any applicable non-competition, non-solicitation, trade secrets, confidentiality or similar restrictive covenant

37

Definition: Good Reason. The following table shows for each of the named executive officers the reasons that each executive may terminate his employment for “Good Reason.”

Definition of “Good Reason” includes:JabbourNackashiLarsenGravelle
Material diminution in executive’s duties or responsibilities
Receipt of notice of non-renewal of employment agreement prior to the two-year anniversary of the closing of the ICE Merger
Material change in the geographic location of the executive’s principal working location
Material diminution of the executive’s title, base salary or annual bonus opportunity
Material breach of any of our obligations under the employment agreement

Potential Payments under Omnibus Incentive Plan

In addition to the post termination rights and obligations set forth in the employment and award agreements, our Omnibus Incentive Plan provides for the potential acceleration of vesting and/or payment of equity awards in connection with a change in control.

Under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, except as otherwise provided in a participant’s award agreement, upon the occurrence of a change in control any and all outstanding options and stock appreciation rights will become immediately exercisable, any restriction imposed on restricted stock, restricted stock units and other awards will lapse, and any and all performance shares, performance units and other awards with performance conditions will be deemed earned at the target level, or, if no target level is specified, the maximum level.

Our performance-based restricted stock award agreements (and for Messrs. Nackashi and Larsen, their May 2022 time-based restricted stock award agreements) provide that the awards will vest in connection with a change in control only if the executive’s employment with the Company is terminated in the six months preceding, or at any time following the change in control that is prior the vesting of the award.

For purposes of our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the term “change in control” is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events:

·An acquisition by an individual, entity or group of 50% or more of our voting power (except for acquisitions by us or any of our employee benefit plans),

·During any period of two consecutive years, a change in the majority of our board, unless the change is approved by 2/3 of the directors then in office,

·A reorganization, merger, share exchange, consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets; excluding, however, a transaction pursuant to which we retain specified levels of stock ownership and board seats, or

·Our shareholders approve a plan or proposal for our liquidation or dissolution.

In 2022, the compensation committee approved changes to the employment agreements of each of Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi, Larsen and Gravelle to provide that all outstanding equity awards granted by the Company or our affiliates will become immediately vested upon a termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive for “Good Reason”.

Potential Payments Under Optimal Blue 2020 Incentive Plan

In addition, Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen may be entitled to receive potential acceleration of vesting in connection with a sale of Optimal Blue under the Optimal Blue 2020 Incentive Plan. According to their profits interest award agreements, 100% of the Class B units granted to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen will become vested upon the consummation of a sale of Optimal Blue.

38

A sale of Optimal Blue for purposes of the Optimal Blue 2020 Incentive Plan generally means the consummation of a transaction or in a series of related transactions with any other person on an arm’s-length basis other than an affiliate of Cannae or THL, pursuant to which such party or parties:

·acquire (whether by merger, Unit purchase, recapitalization, reorganization, redemption, issuance of Units or otherwise) more than 50% of the voting units of Optimal Blue, or

·acquire assets constituting all or substantially all of the assets of Optimal Blue and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Changing the form of organization or the organizational structure of Optimal Blue or its subsidiaries, contributing securities to entities controlled by Optimal Blue and a public offering of Optimal Blue do not constitute a sale of Optimal Blue. Black Knight’s acquisition on February 15, 2022 of the minority interests in Optimal Blue previously held by Cannae and THL did not constitute a sale of Optimal Blue.

In addition, in the event of a change in control of Black Knight, profits interest holders, including Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen, have the right to require Optimal Blue to redeem all, but not less than all, of their Class B units (whether vested or unvested). The redemption price for the Class B units held by any profits interest holder who elects to require redemption of their units would be the fair market value of the units as determined based upon an appraisal process conducted by a nationally recognized valuation or investment banking firm.

In connection with the amendments to Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen’s employment agreements described above, in the event of termination by the Company for a reason other than Cause, death or disability or in the event of a termination by the executive for Good Reason, the Class B units outstanding as of the date of termination would become immediately vested and/or payable.

Potential Payments Upon Change of Control

Except with respect to Mr. Jabbour’s Discretionary Bonus, none of our named executive officers’ agreements provide for a payment or a benefit upon a change of control without termination.

Estimated Cash Payments Upon Termination of Employment

The following table includes the cash severance amounts that would have been payable to each named executive officer in the event of a termination of employment by us not for Cause or a termination by the executive for Good Reason. Our estimate of the cash severance amounts that would be provided to each individual assumes that their employment terminated on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. The severance amounts do not include a prorated 2022 annual incentive since the named executive officers would have been paid based on their service through the end of the year and therefore would have received the annual incentive whether or not the termination occurred, and excludes Mr. Jabbour’s Discretionary Bonus, which was paid on December 20, 2022, subject to the terms and conditions described above.

Reason for Termination Payment: Jabbour  Nackashi  Larsen  Gravelle 
Termination by Company Without Cause  4,605,168   5,625,000   3,667,614   592,000 
Termination by Employee for Good Reason  4,605,168   5,625,000   3,667,614   592,000 
Death            
Disability            

39

Estimated Equity Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

The table below includes the estimated values of the Black Knight restricted stock awards and, in the case of Messrs. Jabbour, Nackashi and Larsen, the Optimal Blue Class B units held by our named executive officers that would vest upon a change of control, upon the termination of their employment due to death or disability, or upon a termination without Cause by the Company or by the executive for Good Reason, in each case assuming such event occurred on December 31, 2022. The amounts below were determined based upon the number of unvested restricted shares held by each executive as of December 30, 2022 (as set forth in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table above), multiplied by $61.75 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022). For Messrs. Jabbour, Larsen and Nackashi, the amounts reflected for a termination without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason also include the value of the Optimal Blue Class B units held by each executive as of December 31, 2022 (as set forth in the Outstanding Optimal Blue Profits Interest Awards at Fiscal Year-End table above), multiplied by a redemption value of $11,038.92 per unit, as determined using the fair value method of accounting under GAAP. As discussed above, on December 20, 2022, to further mitigate the potential impact of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, the compensation committee determined to accelerate the settlement and vesting of the outstanding equity awards granted to Mr. Jabbour that would otherwise have vested in the first quarter of 2023, and therefore such awards are not included in the values below.

Estimated Value of Restricted Stock Awards that Would Vest Jabbour  Nackashi  Larsen  Gravelle 
Termination Without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason  22,112,635   15,888,395   11,164,594   1,361,032 
Death  22,112,635   15,888,395   11,164,594   1,361,032 
Disability  22,112,635   15,888,395   11,164,594   1,361,032 
Change in Control            

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The compensation committee is currently composed of Thomas M. Hagerty (Chair) and David K. Hunt. During 2022, no member of the compensation committee was a former or current officer or employee of Black Knight or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, during 2022, none of our executive officers served (i) as a member of the compensation committee or board of directors of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our compensation committee, or (ii) as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our board.

Discussion of Our Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to Risk Management

We reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all employees including our named executive officers and determined that our compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. In conducting the analysis, we reviewed the structure of our executive, non-executive, sales commission and performance-based restricted stock award incentive programs and the internal controls and risk mitigation processes that are in place for each program. We also reviewed data compiled across our Software Solutions, Data and Analytics and corporate operations relative to Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, compensation expense and incentive program expenses (including as a percentage of both Adjusted revenues and compensation expense).

We believe that several design features of our compensation programs mitigate risk. We set base salaries at levels that provide our employees with assured cash compensation that is appropriate to their job duties and level of responsibility and that, when taken together with incentive awards, motivate them to perform at a high level without encouraging inappropriate risk taking to achieve a reasonable level of secure compensation.

40

With respect to our executives’ incentive opportunities, we believe that our use of measurable corporate financial performance goals, multiple performance levels and minimum, target and maximum achievable payouts, together with the compensation committee’s discretion to reduce awards, serve to mitigate excessive risk taking. The risk of overstatement of financial figures to which incentives are tied is mitigated by our compensation committee’s review and approval of the awards and internal and external review of our financial results. We also believe that our use of restricted stock awards and multi-year vesting schedules in our long-term incentive awards, as well as our executive stock ownership guidelines that strongly promote long-term stock ownership, encourage our executives to deliver incremental value to our shareholders and align their interests with our sustainable long-term performance, thereby mitigating risk.

2022 CEO Pay Ratio

As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our CEO and the annual total compensation of our employees for 2022, which we refer to as our CEO pay ratio. Our CEO pay ratio information is a reasonable good faith estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

The ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, calculated as described above, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees for 2022 was 85 to 1. This ratio was based on the following:

·The annual total compensation of our CEO, determined as described below was $8,400,799; and

·The median of the annual total compensation of all employees (other than our CEO), determined in accordance with SEC rules, was $98,734.

Annual Total Compensation of Chief Executive Officer. We are providing the following information about the relationship of the median annual total compensation of our employees and the total compensation of Mr. Joseph Nackashi, our Chief Executive Officer as of May 16, 2022, pursuant to the SEC’s pay ratio disclosure rules set forth in Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. Because we had cashtwo CEOs during 2022, SEC rules allow us the option of calculating the compensation provided to each CEO during 2022 for the time each served as CEO and cash equivalentscombine those amounts, or for the CEO serving in that position on the date we selected to identify the median employee and annualize that CEO’s compensation. Accordingly, and because Mr. Nackashi is our current CEO, we determined it was appropriate to annualize the compensation Mr. Nackashi received during his role as Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio is calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC’s pay ratio disclosure rules.

Methodology for Determining Our Median Employee. For purposes of $12.2 million, outstanding debt principal of $2,671.2 million and available capacity of $455.0 millionthe above CEO pay ratio disclosure, we are required to identify a median employee based on our revolving credit facility.worldwide workforce, without regard to their location, compensation arrangements, or employment status (full-time versus part-time). The median employee is determined by identifying the employee whose compensation is at the median of the compensation of our employee population (other than our CEO). Accordingly, to identify the median of the compensation of our employee population, the methodology and the material assumptions and estimates that we used were as follows:

Employee Population. We determined that, as of November 30, 2020, the date we selected to identify the median employee, our total global employee population consisted of approximately 5,700 individuals.

41

Compensation Measure Used to Identify the Median Employee. Given the geographical distribution of our employee population, we use a variety of pay elements to structure the compensation arrangements of our employees. Consequently, for purposes of measuring the compensation of our employees to identify the median employee, rather than using annual total compensation, we selected base salary/wages and overtime pay, plus actual annual cash incentive compensation (annual bonus) and allowances paid through November 30, 2020 as the compensation measure.

·We annualized the compensation of employees to cover the full calendar year, and also annualized any new hires in 2020 as if they were hired at the beginning of the fiscal year, as permitted by SEC rules, in identifying the median employee.

·We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the median employee.

·Using this methodology, we estimated that the median employee was an employee with base salary/wages and overtime pay plus actual annual bonuses and allowances paid for the year ended December 31, 2022 of $98,734.

Annual Total Compensation of Median Employee. In order to determine the annual total compensation of the median employee, we identified and calculated the elements of that employee’s compensation for 2022 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation in the amount of $98,734.

Director Compensation

As an executive of the Company, Mr. Jabbour receives no additional compensation for services as a director. In 2022, all non-executive directors received an annual retainer of $75,000, payable quarterly. The chair and each member of the Audit Committee received an additional annual retainer (payable in quarterly installments) of $40,000 and $30,000, respectively, for their service on the Audit Committee. The chairs and each member of the Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Risk Committees received an additional annual retainer (payable in quarterly installments) of $21,000 and $16,000, respectively, for their service on such committees. In addition, Mr. Hagerty received an annual retainer of $30,000 (payable in quarterly installments) for his service as our independent Lead Director.

Each non-executive director also received an equity-based award with a grant date fair value of $225,000, which the Compensation Committee determined to increase from $150,000. In 2022, we offered our non-employee directors the opportunity to elect to receive their annual director equity award in the form of restricted shares or restricted stock units (RSUs). In the case of the RSUs, the award will not settle until the director’s separation of service from the board. All restricted shares and RSUs granted to our directors in 2022 were granted under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, vest in their entirety on the first anniversary of the grant date and are not subject to any performance restriction.

We also reimburse each of our directors for all reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings, as well as with any director education programs, they attend relating to their service on our board of directors. Each non-employee director is eligible to participate in our deferred compensation plan to the extent he or she elects to defer any board or committee fees. Mr. Rao deferred the fees he earned in 2022 for his service on the board and the committees on which he serves.

42

2022 Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:

Name Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)1
  Stock
Awards ($)2
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total ($) 
Catherine L. Burke  91,000   225,003      316,003 
Thomas M. Hagerty  142,000   225,003      367,003 
David K. Hunt  128,000   225,003      353,003 
Joseph M. Otting  115,000   225,003      340,003 
Ganesh B. Rao  91,000   225,003      316,003 
John D. Rood  126,000   225,003      351,003 
Nancy L. Shanik  105,000   225,003      330,003 

1.Amounts include the cash portion of annual board and committee retainers earned for services as a director in 2022. Amounts shown are not reduced to reflect directors’ elections, if any, to defer receipt of retainers into our deferred compensation plan.
2.Amounts shown for all directors represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted in 2022, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For Ms. Burke, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Otting and Ms. Shanik, these awards consisted of 3,383 restricted stock units granted in June 2022. For Mr. Hunt, Mr. Rao and Mr. Rood, these awards consisted of 3,383 restricted shares of common stock. All of the restricted stock unit and restricted stock awards granted to our directors in 2022 vest on the first anniversary of the grant date subject to continued service on our board. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 16 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2023. The grant date fair values of the awards granted in 2022 are based on a per share grant date fair value of $66.51, which is equal to the closing price of our common stock on June 10, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, awards outstanding for each director were as follows: Ms. Burke 3,383 restricted stock units; Mr. Hagerty 3,383 restricted stock units; Mr. Hunt 3,383 restricted shares; Mr. Otting 3,383 restricted stock units; Mr. Rao 3,383 restricted shares; Mr. Rood 3,383 restricted shares; and Ms. Shanik 3,383 restricted stock units.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, upon closing of the ICE Merger, each outstanding restricted stock award held by a non-employee director will vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the merger consideration, and each restricted stock unit award held by a non-employee director will vest in full and be deemed settled for a number of shares of Black Knight common stock equal to the number of shares underlying the restricted stock unit award, which will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the merger consideration.

43

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This Form 10-K/A contains non-GAAP financial measures, including Adjusted revenues, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EPS. These are important financial measures for us but are not financial measures as defined by generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation of or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe these measures provide useful information about operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision making, including determining a portion of executive compensation. We also present these non-GAAP financial measures because we believe investors, analysts and rating agencies consider them useful in measuring our ability to meet our debt service obligations. By disclosing these non-GAAP financial measures, we believe we offer investors a greater understanding of, and an enhanced level of transparency into, the means by which our management operates the company.

These non-GAAP financial measures are not measures presented in accordance with GAAP, and our use of these terms may vary from that of others in our industry. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to revenues, operating income, operating margin, net earnings, net earnings per share, net earnings margin or any other measures derived in accordance with GAAP as measures of operating performance or liquidity. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are presented in the attached schedules.

Adjusted revenues - We define Adjusted revenues as Revenues adjusted to include the revenues that we did not record during the respective period due to the deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustment recorded in accordance with GAAP. We also exclude the effect of in-year acquisitions and divestitures and the market and/or legislative effect on origination and foreclosure volumes.

Adjusted EBITDA - We define Adjusted EBITDA as Net earnings attributable to Black Knight, with adjustments to reflect the addition or elimination of certain statement of earnings items including, but not limited to:

·Depreciation and amortization;

·Impairment charges;

·Interest expense, net;

·Income tax expense;

·Other expense, net;

·Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax;

·(Gains) losses related to investments in unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax;

·Net earnings (losses) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests;

·equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes;

·acquisition-related costs, including costs pursuant to purchase agreements;

·costs related to the ICE Transaction; and

·costs associated with expense reduction initiatives.

These adjustments are reflected in Corporate and Other.


Adjusted net earnings - We define Adjusted net earnings as Net earnings attributable to Black Knight with adjustments to reflect the addition or elimination of certain statement of earnings items including, but not limited to:

·equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax;

·(gains) losses related to investments in unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax;

·(gain) related to the TitlePoint Transaction;

·the net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting;

·equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes;

·costs associated with debt and/or equity offerings;

·acquisition-related costs, including costs pursuant to purchase agreements;

·costs related to the ICE Transaction;

·costs associated with expense reduction initiatives;

·costs and settlement (gains) losses associated with significant legal matters;

·adjustment for income tax expense primarily related to the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments and a discrete income tax benefit related to the establishment of a deferred tax asset as a result of our reorganization of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries; and

·adjustment for redeemable noncontrolling interests primarily related to the effect of the non-GAAP adjustments.

Adjusted EPS - Adjusted EPS is calculated by dividing Adjusted net earnings by the diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding.


BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures

(In millions)

(Unaudited)

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted EBITDA

  Year ended December 31, 
  2022  2021 
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight $452.5  $207.9 
Depreciation and amortization  369.6   365.0 
Interest expense, net  100.6   83.6 
Income tax expense  22.4   35.7 
Other expense, net  11.9   6.4 
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax  (1.3)  7.3 
Gain related to investment in unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax  (305.4)  (9.9)
Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests  (2.5)  (28.0)
EBITDA  647.8   668.0 
Equity-based compensation  55.7   42.9 
Acquisition-related costs  7.3   8.0 
ICE Transaction-related costs  22.3    
Expense reduction initiatives  2.2   5.3 
Adjusted EBITDA $735.3  $724.2 


BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures (Continued)

(In millions, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Net Earnings

  Year ended December 31, 
  2022  2021 
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight $452.5  $207.9 
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax  (1.3)  7.3 
Gain related to investment in unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax  (305.4)  (9.9)
Depreciation and amortization purchase accounting adjustment  207.5   219.0 
Equity-based compensation  55.7   42.9 
Debt and/or equity offering expenses     2.3 
Acquisition-related costs  7.3   8.0 
ICE Transaction-related costs  22.3    
Expense reduction initiatives  2.0   5.3 
Legal matters  12.4   4.2 
Income tax expense adjustment  (82.3)  (67.4)
Redeemable noncontrolling interests adjustment  (5.8)  (48.1)
Adjusted net earnings $364.9  $371.5 
         
Adjusted EPS $2.35  $2.38 
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted  155.6   155.8 


Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by each shareholder who is known by the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of such class. Percentages in the table reflect the percent of common shares held by each shareholder.

Name Shares
Beneficially Owned1
  Percent of
Total Class2
 
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
  14,119,015   9.0%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202
  13,813,507   8.8%

Massachusetts Financial Services Co.

111 Huntington Avenue, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02199

  12,322,028   7.9%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
  11,534,993   7.4%

1.Amounts are based on information publicly filed with the SEC.

2.Applicable percentages based on 156,799,838 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 13, 2023.

Security Ownership of Management and Directors

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

·Each of our directors and nominees for director;

·Each of the named executive officers as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC; and

·All of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Percentages in the following table reflect the percent of our common shares outstanding as of March 13, 2023. The mailing address of each director and executive officer shown in the table below is c/o Black Knight, Inc., 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204.


Name Number of Shares  Percent of Shares1 
Catherine L. Burke  6,760   * 
Michael L. Gravelle  112,260   * 
Thomas M. Hagerty2  53,560   * 
David K. Hunt  65,045   * 
Anthony M. Jabbour3  785,414   * 
Kirk T. Larsen4  538,451   * 
Joseph M. Nackashi  418,960   * 
Joseph M. Otting5  16,734   * 
Ganesh B. Rao  16,862   * 
John D. Rood  81,487   * 
Nancy L. Shanik  8,024   * 
Michele M. Meyers6  18,980   * 
All directors and officers (11 persons)7  2,103,557   1.3%

* Represents less than 1% of our common stock.

1.Applicable percentages based on 156,799,838 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 13, 2023.
2.Includes 14,476 shares of our common stock held by trust.
3.Includes 41,300 shares of our common stock held by Anthony M. Jabbour 2021 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust and 413,410 shares of our common stock held by the Anthony M. Jabbour 2022 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust.
4.Includes 154,895 shares of our common stock held by the Kirk Larsen Revocable Trust.
5.Includes 5,605 shares of our common stock held by the Otting Family Trust.
6.Reflects Ms. Meyers, ownership as of March 12, 2022, the date she departed the Company.
7.Excludes Ms. Meyers, who departed the Company on March 12, 2022.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2022 about our common stock which may be issued under our equity compensation plans:

Plan CategoryNumber of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights (a)

Weighted

Average
Exercise Price

of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights (b)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a))(c)
1
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders6,126,892
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total6,126,892

1.In addition to being available for future issuance upon exercise of options and stock appreciation rights, under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, shares of our common stock may be issued in connection with awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or other equity-based awards.


Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

Our nominating and corporate governance committee evaluates our relationships with each director and nominee and makes a recommendation to our board of directors as to whether to make an affirmative determination that such director or nominee is independent. Under our corporate governance guidelines, an “independent” director is one who meets the qualification requirements for being independent under applicable laws and the corporate governance listing standards of NYSE.

Our board of directors determined that Catherine L. Burke, Thomas M. Hagerty, David K. Hunt, Joseph M. Otting, Ganesh B. Rao, John D. Rood and Nancy L. Shanik are independent. The board of directors also determined that Messrs. Hagerty and Hunt are independent for purposes of service on our compensation committee.

In determining independence, the board of directors considered all relationships that might bear on our directors’ independence from Black Knight. The board of directors determined that Anthony M. Jabbour is not independent because he is the Executive Chairman of Black Knight.

In considering the independence of our directors, the board of directors considered the following factors:

·Mr. Hagerty and Mr. Rao are each Managing Directors of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (THL). On February 15, 2022, we purchased THL’s 20% interest in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC (Optimal Blue) for aggregate consideration of (y) $289 million in cash and (z) 14,550,544 shares of common stock of DNB owned by Black Knight. For further discussion of our purchase of the minority interests in Optimal Blue, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.

·Prior to our purchase of the minority interests in Optimal Blue, we owned approximately 13% of the outstanding common stock of DNB. THL owned approximately 11% of DNB’s common stock, and Messrs. Hagerty and Rao each serve on the board of directors of DNB. We, THL and certain other investors in DNB are party to a letter agreement regarding voting pursuant to which the parties agreed to vote their shares in DNB as a group on all matters relating to the election of directors to the DNB board, including the election of Messrs. Hagerty and Rao, for a period of three years following DNB’s initial public offering.

Following consideration of these matters, the board of directors determined that these relationships were not of a nature that would impair Mr. Hagerty’s or Mr. Rao’s independence.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Investment in Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. and Related Agreements

As of December 31, 2022, we owned 18.5 million shares of DNB common stock forheld an ownership interest in DNB of approximately 4% in DNB and our Executive Chairman Anthony M. Jabbour also serves as CEO and a director of DNB’s outstanding common stock.DNB. In addition, two of our other directors, Mr. Hagerty and Mr. Rao, also serve on the board of directors of DNB. We received quarterly cash dividends totaling $1.8 million from DNB in the year ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31,30, 2022, DNB’s closing share price was $12.26 and the fair value of our investment in DNB was $226.5 million before tax. Assuming a statutory tax rate of 25.5%, the estimated after-tax value of our investment in DNB was $211.0 million. Refer to Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Our primary cash requirements include operating expenses, debt service payments (principal and interest), capital expenditures (including software development, equipment and property related expenditures) and tax-related payments and may include business acquisitions and share repurchases.

We believe that our cash flows from operations and available cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs, including the repayment of our outstanding debt, for at least the next 12 months. We anticipate that to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through borrowings on our revolving credit facility, the incurrence of other indebtedness, the sale of DNB common stock, equity issuance or a combination thereof. The loss of the largest lender on our revolving credit facility would reduce our borrowing capacity by $90.0 million. Additionally, our liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations and fund our capital requirements are also dependent on our future financial performance, which is subject to general economic, financial and other factors that are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot be assured that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available from additional indebtedness or otherwise to meet our liquidity needs. Although we have no specific current plans to do so, if we decide to pursue one or more significant acquisitions, we may incur additional debt or sell additional equity to finance such acquisitions.


47

Cash Flows

The following table provides a summary of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

Variance

Cash flows provided by operating activities

$

251.7

$

449.9

$

(198.2)

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

(124.3)

 

(429.8)

 

305.5

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(192.3)

 

22.3

 

(214.6)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

$

(64.9)

$

42.4

$

(107.3)

Operating Activities

The $198.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2022 compared to 2021 is primarily related to higher income tax payments of $112.4 million, including approximately $75 million of income tax payments related to the DNB gain we recognized as part of the February 2022 Optimal Blue transaction and approximately $32 million related to the effect of the change in timing of deducting certain software development costs under Internal Revenue Code Section 174, as well as payments of approximately $43 million made in connection with certain tax-planning actions to mitigate the potential impact of Internal Revenue Code Section 280G related to the proposed ICE Transaction.

Investing Activities

The $305.5 million decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2022 compared to 2021 is primarily related to business acquisitions in 2021.

Financing Activities

The $214.6 million increase in cash used in financing activities in 2022 compared to 2021 is primarily related to the cash paid in February 2022 as part of the aggregate purchase consideration for acquiring the remaining outstanding Class A Units of Optimal Blue from Cannae and THL, partially offset by share repurchases in 2021.

Financing

For a description of our financing arrangements, see Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contractual Obligations

Our long-term contractual obligations generally include our debt and related interest payments, software subscription, cloud computing and hardware and software maintenance commitments and operating and finance lease payments for our offices, data centers, property and equipment. These long-term contractual obligations extend through 2028.

48

Payments due by period

    

Total

    

2023

    

2024

    

2025

    

2026

    

2027

    

Thereafter

Debt

$

2,671.2

$

33.7

$

57.5

$

57.5

$

1,522.5

$

$

1,000.0

Interest on debt(1)

 

521.3

 

133.0

 

132.9

 

129.2

 

53.6

 

36.3

 

36.3

Software subscription, cloud computing and hardware and software maintenance agreements

86.7

61.7

17.7

3.9

3.4

Operating lease payments

27.2

8.8

7.8

3.0

2.8

2.6

2.2

Other(2)

4.8

1.3

1.3

1.3

0.5

0.3

0.1

Total

$

3,311.2

$

238.5

$

217.2

$

194.9

$

1,582.8

$

39.2

$

1,038.6

(1)These calculations include the effect of our interest rate swaps that expire in 2023 and assume that (a) applicable margins remain constant; (b) our term A loan and revolving credit facility variable rate debt is priced at the one-month LIBOR in effect as of December 31, 2022; (c) only mandatory debt repayments are made; and (d) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity.
(2)Other includes commitment fees on our revolving credit facility and rating agencies fees.

Our interest rate swaps represent our material off-balance sheet arrangements. Refer to Note 11 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Indemnifications and Warranties

We often agree to indemnify our clients against damages and costs resulting from claims of patent, copyright, trademark infringement or breaches of confidentiality associated with use of our software through software licensing agreements. Historically, we have not made any payments under such indemnifications, but continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the indemnifications to identify whether a loss has occurred that is both probable and estimable that would require recognition. In addition, we warrant to clients that our software operates substantially in accordance with the software specifications. Historically, no costs have been incurred related to software warranties and none are expected in the future, and as such, no accruals for warranty costs have been made.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A.           Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are routinely subject to a variety of risks, as described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of Part I of this Report and in our other filings with the SEC.

The risks related to our business also include certain market risks that may affect our debt and other financial instruments. At present, we face the market risks primarily associated with interest rate movements on our outstanding debt.

Market Risk

We regularly assess market risks and have established policies and business practices designed to protect against the adverse effects of these exposures. We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates. We use interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk. We do not use interest rate swaps for trading purposes, to generate income or to engage in speculative activity.

Interest Rate Risk

In addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities, we use fixed and variable rate debt to finance our operations.

49

Our Senior Notes represent our fixed-rate long-term debt. Refer to Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The carrying value of our Senior Notes was $991.1 million, net of original issue discount and debt issuance costs, as of December 31, 2022. The fair value of our Senior Notes was approximately $870.0 million as of December 31, 2022. The potential reduction in fair value of the Senior Notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of debt.

We enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge forecasted monthly interest rate payments on our variable rate debt. We are exposed to interest rate risk on our debt obligations and related interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2022, we had $1,666.2 million in long-term debt principal outstanding from our Facilities, all of which is variable rate debt, as described in Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of December 31, 2022, the Facilities represent our long-term debt obligations exposed to interest rate risk. We performed a sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of debt as of December 31, 2022, as well as the effect of our interest rate swaps. Further, in this sensitivity analysis, the change in interest rates is assumed to be applicable for an entire year. An increase or decrease of 100 basis points in the applicable interest rate would cause an increase or decrease in interest expense of $16.7 million on an annual basis ($15.6 million including the effect of our current interest rate swaps) as the 1-week and 1-month LIBOR were approximately 4.32% and 4.38%, respectively, as of December 31, 2022.

As of December 31, 2022, we have the following interest rate swaps agreements (collectively, the "Swap Agreements") (in millions):

Effective dates

    

Notional amount

    

Fixed rates

April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023

$

250.0

 

2.61

%

January 31, 2019 through January 31, 2023

$

300.0

 

2.65

%

Under the terms of the Swap Agreements, we receive payments based on the 1-month LIBOR (approximately 4.38% as of December 31, 2022).

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the following interest rate swap agreement expired (in millions):

Effective dates

    

Notional amount

    

Fixed rate

March 31, 2017 through March 31, 2022

$

200.0

 

2.08

%

The Swap Agreements were designated as cash flow hedging instruments. A portion of the amount included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss is reclassified into Interest expense, net as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the hedged debt. The inputs used to determine the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps are Level 2 inputs. We considered our own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparties when determining the fair value of our Swap Agreements.

50

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Black Knight, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Black Knight, Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 28, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
February 28, 2023

52

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Black Knight, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Black Knight, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Acquisition of Optimal Blue, LLC

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired Optimal Blue, LLC on September 15, 2020.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Assessment of revenue recognition for contracts with multiple performance obligations

As discussed in Notes 2 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is often party to multiple concurrent contracts or contracts in which a customer may purchase a combination of products and services. For contracts with customers that contain various combinations of products and services, the Company must evaluate

53

whether the promises within the contract are capable of being distinct and are distinct in the context of the contract. Distinct products or services are accounted for as separate performance obligations, while non-distinct products or services are combined with others to form a single performance obligation. Given the nature of the Company’s product and service offerings, there is complexity in determining whether the promises are separate performance obligations or a combined performance obligation. The identification of performance obligations, specifically for revenue contracts with professional services, influence the amount and timing of revenue recognition.

We identified the assessment of revenue recognition for contracts with multiple performance obligations as a critical audit matter. Specifically, the critical audit matter related to the Company’s identification of performance obligations for revenue contracts with professional services and the resulting accounting treatment. This was due to the extensive audit effort and complex auditor judgment required to evaluate the Company’s contracts in these circumstances.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the revenue recognition process. This included controls over the Company’s review of customer contracts for the identification of performance obligations. For selected new and modified revenue arrangements, we assessed the Company’s identification of performance obligations by evaluating the Company’s analysis of the revenue arrangements as compared to the revenue recognition standard and the underlying contracts and/or statements of work. In addition, for a sample of professional services revenue transactions, we assessed the Company’s identification of distinct and non-distinct performance obligations by evaluating the Company’s analysis through comparison to contract source documents and correspondence or through involvement of information technology professionals with specialized skills and knowledge in discussions with the Company’s product and service technicians.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

Jacksonville, Florida

February 28, 2023

54

BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In millions, except share data)

    

December 31, 

2022

2021

ASSETS

Current assets:

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

$

12.2

$

77.1

Trade receivables, net

 

193.5

 

191.8

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

132.1

 

83.0

Receivables from related parties

 

0.1

 

0.2

Current assets held for sale

5.8

 

Total current assets

 

343.7

 

352.1

Property and equipment, net

 

143.0

 

154.5

Software, net

 

443.7

 

497.0

Other intangible assets, net

 

470.1

 

613.2

Goodwill

 

3,747.8

 

3,817.3

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

 

171.0

 

490.5

Deferred contract costs, net

 

192.6

 

196.0

Other non-current assets

 

246.2

 

230.3

Non-current assets held for sale

73.5

Total assets

$

5,831.6

$

6,350.9

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

  

 

  

Current liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities

$

66.5

$

64.5

Income taxes payable

28.4

11.8

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

82.8

 

91.4

Current portion of debt

 

33.6

 

32.5

Deferred revenues

 

59.9

 

64.6

Total current liabilities

 

271.2

 

264.8

Deferred revenues

 

42.4

 

81.5

Deferred income taxes

 

227.5

 

284.1

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

2,621.7

 

2,362.6

Other non-current liabilities

 

47.9

 

78.7

Total liabilities

 

3,210.7

 

3,071.7

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

 

  

 

  

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

47.6

 

1,188.8

Equity:

 

  

 

  

Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 550,000,000 shares authorized; 160,040,598 shares issued and 155,930,399 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2022, and 160,040,598 shares issued and 155,357,705 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021

 

 

Preferred stock; $0.0001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding, none as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,398.2

 

1,410.9

Retained earnings

 

1,417.1

 

968.2

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(6.3)

 

(17.5)

Treasury stock, at cost, 4,110,199 shares as of December 31, 2022 and 4,682,893 shares as of December 31, 2021

 

(235.7)

 

(271.2)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

2,573.3

 

2,090.4

Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and shareholders’ equity

$

5,831.6

$

6,350.9

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

55

BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings

(In millions, except per share data)

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

    

2020

Revenues

$

1,551.9

$

1,475.2

$

1,238.5

Expenses:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Operating expenses

 

872.3

 

793.9

 

669.6

Depreciation and amortization

 

369.6

 

365.0

 

270.7

Transition and integration costs

 

31.8

 

13.3

 

31.4

Total expenses

 

1,273.7

 

1,172.2

 

971.7

Operating income

 

278.2

 

303.0

 

266.8

Other income and expense:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Interest expense, net

 

(100.6)

 

(83.6)

 

(62.9)

Other (expense) income, net

 

(11.9)

 

(6.4)

 

16.4

Total other expense, net

 

(112.5)

 

(90.0)

 

(46.5)

Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

165.7

 

213.0

 

220.3

Income tax expense

 

22.4

 

35.7

 

41.6

Earnings before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

143.3

 

177.3

 

178.7

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

306.7

 

2.6

 

67.1

Net earnings

 

450.0

 

179.9

 

245.8

Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

2.5

 

28.0

 

18.3

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

$

452.5

$

207.9

$

264.1

Other comprehensive earnings (losses):

 

  

 

  

 

  

Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax(1)

 

8.2

 

1.7

 

(23.9)

Reclassification adjustments for losses included in net earnings, net of tax(2)

 

4.5

 

15.3

 

12.2

Total unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps, net of tax

 

12.7

 

17.0

 

(11.7)

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax (3)

 

(1.2)

 

(0.4)

 

(0.1)

Unrealized (losses) gains on investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax(4)

 

(0.3)

 

4.7

 

(6.8)

Other comprehensive earnings (loss)

 

11.2

 

21.3

 

(18.6)

Comprehensive earnings

 

461.2

 

201.2

 

227.2

Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

2.5

 

28.0

 

18.3

Comprehensive earnings attributable to Black Knight

$

463.7

$

229.2

$

245.5

Net earnings per share attributable to Black Knight common shareholders:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Basic

$

2.93

$

1.34

$

1.74

Diluted

$

2.91

$

1.33

$

1.73

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding (see Note 5):

 

  

 

  

 

  

Basic

 

154.4

 

155.1

 

152.0

Diluted

 

155.6

 

155.8

 

152.9

(1)Net of income tax expense of $2.8 million and $0.6 million and income tax benefit of $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2)Amounts reclassified to net earnings relate to losses on interest rate swaps and are included in Interest expense, net above. Amounts are net of income tax benefit of $1.6 million, $5.2 million and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(3)Net of income tax benefit of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and less than $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(4)Net of income tax benefit of $0.1 million, income tax expense of $1.6 million and income tax benefit of $2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

56

BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Equity

(In millions)

Accumulated

Additional

other

Total

Redeemable

Common stock

paid-in

Retained

comprehensive

Treasury stock

Shareholders'

noncontrolling

 

Shares

   

$

   

capital

   

earnings

   

loss

   

Shares

   

$

   

equity

   

interests

Balance, December 31, 2019

    

153.1

$

$

1,586.8

$

490.6

$

(20.2)

3.4

$

(158.7)

$

1,898.5

$

Effect of ASU 2016-13 adoption (Note 2)

 

 

 

 

(1.1)

 

 

 

 

(1.1)

 

Adjusted balance, January 1, 2020

 

153.1

 

 

1,586.8

 

489.5

 

(20.2)

 

3.4

 

(158.7)

 

1,897.4

 

Issuance of common stock, net of underwriters' discount and issuance costs

 

7.1

484.2

484.2

Grant of restricted shares of common stock

 

 

 

(24.9)

 

 

 

(0.5)

 

24.9

 

 

Forfeitures of restricted shares of common stock

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

(0.6)

 

 

Tax withholding payments for restricted share vesting

 

(0.1)

 

 

(22.4)

 

 

 

 

 

(22.4)

 

Vesting of restricted shares granted from treasury stock

 

 

 

10.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

(10.2)

 

 

Equity-based compensation expense

 

 

 

39.4

 

 

 

 

 

39.4

 

Contributions received for redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC

 

578.0

Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC

 

(18.3)

(18.3)

18.3

Deferred income taxes recognized related to the contribution of Compass Analytics to Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC

(1.9)

(1.9)

Net earnings (loss)

 

 

 

 

264.1

 

 

 

 

264.1

 

(18.3)

Equity-based compensation expense of unconsolidated affiliates

 

3.8

3.8

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

 

(0.1)

 

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, net

 

 

 

 

 

(11.7)

 

 

 

(11.7)

 

Other comprehensive loss on investments in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

(6.8)

 

 

 

(6.8)

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

160.1

2,053.7

757.4

(38.8)

 

3.1

(144.6)

2,627.7

578.0

Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC

 

 

 

(638.8)

 

 

 

 

 

(638.8)

 

638.8

Grant of restricted shares of common stock

 

 

 

(35.3)

 

 

 

(0.7)

 

35.3

 

 

Forfeitures of restricted shares of common stock

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

 

(3.0)

 

 

Tax withholding payments for restricted share vesting

 

(0.1)

 

 

(25.6)

 

 

 

 

 

(25.6)

 

Vesting of restricted shares granted from treasury stock

 

 

 

12.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

(12.2)

 

 

Equity-based compensation expense

 

 

41.7

 

 

 

 

 

41.7

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

 

 

207.9

 

 

 

 

207.9

 

(28.0)

Equity-based compensation expense of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

2.0

(146.7)

(146.7)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

(0.4)

 

 

 

(0.4)

 

Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps, net

 

 

 

 

 

17.0

 

 

 

17.0

 

Other comprehensive gains on investments in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

4.7

 

Balance, December 31, 2021

 

160.0

$

$

1,410.9

$

968.2

$

(17.5)

 

4.7

$

(271.2)

$

2,090.4

$

1,188.8

57

BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Equity - (Continued)

(In millions)

Accumulated

Additional

other

Total

Redeemable

Common stock

paid-in

Retained

comprehensive

Treasury stock

shareholders'

noncontrolling

    

Shares

   

$

   

capital

   

earnings

   

loss

   

Shares

   

$

   

equity

   

interests

Balance, December 31, 2021

 

160.0

$

$

1,410.9

$

968.2

$

(17.5)

 

4.7

$

(271.2)

$

2,090.4

$

1,188.8

Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC

 

 

 

(17.3)

 

 

 

 

 

(17.3)

 

17.3

Acquisition of remaining redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,156.0)

Grant of restricted shares of common stock

 

 

 

(52.1)

 

 

 

(0.9)

 

52.1

 

 

Forfeitures of restricted shares of common stock

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

 

(2.4)

 

 

Tax withholding payments for restricted share vesting

 

 

 

(17.8)

 

 

 

 

 

(17.8)

 

Vesting of restricted shares granted from treasury stock

 

 

 

14.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

(14.2)

 

 

Equity-based compensation expense

 

 

 

54.9

 

 

 

 

 

54.9

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

 

 

 

452.5

 

 

 

 

452.5

 

(2.5)

Equity-based compensation expense of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

 

 

(3.6)

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

(1.2)

 

 

 

(1.2)

 

Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps, net

 

 

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

12.7

 

Other comprehensive loss on investments in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

 

(0.3)

 

Other

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

 

 

3.0

 

Balance, December 31, 2022

 

160.0

$

$

1,398.2

$

1,417.1

$

(6.3)

 

4.1

$

(235.7)

$

2,573.3

$

47.6

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

58

BLACK KNIGHT, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In millions)

    

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

2020

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

  

 

  

Net earnings

$

450.0

$

179.9

$

245.8

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

  

 

  

Depreciation and amortization

 

369.6

365.0

 

270.7

Amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount

 

3.8

3.9

 

3.4

Loss on extinguishment of debt

2.5

Deferred income taxes, net

 

(160.0)

(17.0)

 

(20.6)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

(306.7)

(2.6)

 

(67.1)

Equity-based compensation

 

54.9

41.7

 

39.4

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities:

 

 

Trade receivables, including receivables from related parties

 

(7.6)

(5.9)

 

6.0

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(64.0)

(42.5)

 

(3.6)

Deferred contract costs

 

(42.3)

(57.9)

 

(46.9)

Deferred revenues

 

(43.8)

(3.9)

 

(20.7)

Trade accounts payable and other liabilities

 

(2.2)

(13.3)

 

9.0

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

251.7

449.9

 

415.4

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

  

  

 

  

Additions to property and equipment

 

(27.2)

(28.5)

 

(23.9)

Additions to software

 

(93.1)

(85.1)

 

(89.3)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

(302.6)

 

(1,869.4)

Investment in Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. ("DNB")

 

 

(100.0)

Asset acquisitions

 

(10.0)

 

(15.0)

Other investing activities

(4.0)

(3.6)

8.4

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(124.3)

(429.8)

 

(2,089.2)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

  

  

 

  

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock, before offering expenses

484.6

Costs directly associated with issuance of common stock

(0.4)

Issuance of senior unsecured notes, net of original issue discount

990.0

Revolver borrowings

 

750.6

660.4

 

600.6

Revolver payments

 

(461.6)

(452.1)

 

(862.9)

Term loan borrowings

1.6

Term loan payments

 

(28.8)

 

(54.7)

(Payments made) contributions received for redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

(433.5)

 

578.0

Purchases of treasury stock

 

(146.7)

 

Tax withholding payments for restricted share vesting

 

(17.8)

(25.6)

 

(22.4)

Finance lease payments

 

(0.8)

(3.6)

 

(13.0)

Debt issuance costs paid

 

(7.7)

(2.4)

Other financing activities

 

(0.4)

(4.0)

 

(4.3)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(192.3)

22.3

 

1,693.1

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(64.9)

42.4

 

19.3

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

77.1

34.7

 

15.4

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$

12.2

$

77.1

$

34.7

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

  

  

 

  

Interest paid, net

$

(97.0)

$

(80.4)

$

(46.8)

Income taxes paid, net

$

(165.1)

$

(52.7)

$

(52.5)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

59

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to "Black Knight," the "Company”, "we," "us" or "our" are to Black Knight, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("BKI"), and its subsidiaries.

(1)Basis of Presentation

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Description of Business

We are a premier provider of integrated, innovative, mission-critical, high-performance software solutions, data and analytics to the U.S. mortgage and real estate markets. Our mission is to transform the markets we serve by delivering innovative solutions that are integrated across the homeownership lifecycle and that result in realized efficiencies, reduced risk and new opportunities for our clients to help them achieve greater levels of success.

Reporting Segments

We conduct our operations through two reporting segments, (1) Software Solutions and (2) Data and Analytics. See further discussion in Note 19 — Segment Information.

Merger Agreement

On May 4, 2022, we entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”), a leading global provider of data, technology, and market infrastructure, in a transaction valued at approximately $13.1 billion, or $85 per share, with consideration in the form of a mix of cash (80%) and stock (20%) (the “ICE Transaction”). The aggregate cash consideration in the ICE Transaction consists of approximately $10.5 billion and the aggregate stock consideration is valued at approximately $2.6 billion based on ICE’s 10-day volume weighted average price as of May 2, 2022 of $118.09. Black Knight shareholders can elect to receive either cash or stock, subject to proration, with the value of the cash election and the stock election equalized at closing. The ICE Transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2023, subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The ICE Transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of Black Knight and ICE. On September 21, 2022, we held a special meeting of our shareholders and the ICE Transaction was approved by our shareholders.

Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act’) and related rules, the ICE Transaction may not be completed until notifications have been given and information furnished to the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (the “Antitrust Division”) and the United States Federal Trade Commission, (the “FTC”) and all statutory waiting period requirements have been satisfied. Completion of the ICE Transaction is subject to the expiration or earlier termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act. ICE and Black Knight each filed their respective HSR Act notification forms on May 18, 2022. On June 17, 2022, the parties each received a Request for Additional Information and Documentary Material (the “Second Request”) from the FTC with respect to the ICE Transaction. Accordingly, the HSR waiting period will expire 30 days after ICE and Black Knight each certify their substantial compliance with the Second Request, unless earlier terminated by the FTC or extended by agreement of the parties or court order.

TitlePoint Transaction

On November 18, 2022, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our TitlePoint line of business (“TitlePoint”) within our Data and Analytics reporting segment to an affiliate of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“FNF”) for $225 million in cash, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. In connection with the contribution of Property Insight, LLC, which included TitlePoint, by affiliates of FNF to an affiliate of Black Knight in 2014, FNF had the right to repurchase TitlePoint in the event of a change in control of Black Knight. In connection with the proposed ICE Transaction, FNF notified us of its desire to repurchase TitlePoint. The TitlePoint transaction closed on January 1, 2023. Assets sold as part of the transaction are classified as assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies for additional information.

60

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(2)Significant Accounting Policies

The following describes our significant accounting policies that have been followed in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BKI, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and non-wholly owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest either through voting rights or means other than voting rights. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Where our ownership interest in a consolidated subsidiary is less than 100%, the noncontrolling interests’ share of these non-wholly owned subsidiaries is reported in our consolidated balance sheets as a separate component of equity or within temporary equity. The noncontrolling interests’ share of the net earnings (loss) of these non-wholly owned subsidiaries is reported in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings as an adjustment to our net earnings to arrive at Net earnings attributable to Black Knight.

We consolidate variable interest entities (“VIEs”) if we are considered the primary beneficiary because we have (a) the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. For VIEs where we are not the primary beneficiary and do not control the VIE, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over the VIE, we use the equity method of accounting to report their results. The determination of the primary beneficiary involves judgment. Refer to the “Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” section below for additional information related to our equity method investments. Refer to the “Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests” section below and Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information related to our acquisition of Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC (“Optimal Blue Holdco”).

Management Estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are invested with high credit quality financial institutions and consist of short-term investments, such as demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, money market funds and time deposits. The carrying amounts of these instruments reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate their fair value because of their immediate or short-term maturities.

Cash and cash equivalents are unrestricted and consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

    

2021

Cash

$

4.3

$

24.0

Cash equivalents

 

7.9

 

53.1

Cash and cash equivalents

$

12.2

$

77.1

61

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Trade Receivables, Net

A summary of Trade receivables, net of allowance for credit losses is as follows (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

    

2021

Trade receivables — billed

$

150.4

$

147.4

Trade receivables — unbilled

 

48.0

 

47.1

Trade receivables

 

198.4

 

194.5

Allowance for credit losses

 

(4.9)

 

(2.7)

Trade receivables, net

$

193.5

$

191.8

Allowance for Credit Losses

We record our billed and unbilled trade receivables and contract assets at their amortized cost less an allowance for estimated credit losses that are not expected to be recovered over the assets’ remaining lifetime based on management’s expectation of collectibility. We base our estimate on multiple factors including historical experience with bad debts, our relationship with our clients and their credit quality, the aging of respective asset balances, current macroeconomic conditions and management’s expectations of conditions in the future. Our allowance for expected credit losses is based on management’s assessment of the collectibility of assets with similar risk characteristics. We pool our respective asset balances based on risk characteristics primarily related to financial asset type, extent of client relationship, product/solution, business division and delinquency status.

Subsequent changes in the allowance are recorded in Operating expenses. We write off trade receivables in the period when the likelihood of collection of a trade receivable balance is considered remote.

The rollforward of allowance for credit losses for Trade receivables, net is as follows (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Beginning balance

$

(2.7)

$

(2.1)

$

(1.3)

Effect of ASU 2016-13 adoption(1)

 

 

 

(0.5)

Bad debt expense

 

(3.8)

 

(1.2)

 

(1.2)

Write-offs, net of recoveries

 

0.9

 

0.6

 

0.9

Assets held for sale reclassification(2)

0.7

Ending balance

$

(4.9)

$

(2.7)

$

(2.1)

(1)On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses, as well as several other related updates. Refer to section "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" below for details.
(2)Trade receivables and the related allowance for credit losses related to TitlePoint were reclassified to Assets held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022. Refer to the Assets held for sale section below.

62

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

    

2021

Prepaid expenses

$

83.0

$

44.7

Contract assets, net

 

24.8

 

23.0

Income tax receivables

12.5

6.5

Other current assets

 

11.8

 

8.8

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

$

132.1

$

83.0

Contract Assets

A contract asset represents our expectation of receiving consideration in exchange for products or services that we have provided to our client but invoicing is contingent on our completion of other performance obligations or contractual milestones, primarily related to our loan origination system solutions. Contract assets and liabilities, or deferred revenues, are determined and presented on a net basis at the contract level since the rights and obligations in a contract with a client are interdependent. In contrast, a receivable is our right to consideration that is unconditional except for the passage of time required before payment of that consideration is due. The difference in timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, unbilled receivables, contract assets and deferred revenues from client advances and deposits. We assess contract assets for impairment. Our short-term contract assets are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and includes an allowance for estimated credit losses of $0.3 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our long-term contract assets are included in Other non-current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to the section titled “Other Non-Current Assets” section below.

Assets Held for Sale

As noted in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation, on November 18, 2022 we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our TitlePoint line of business within our Data and Analytics reporting segment to an affiliate of FNF and the transaction was completed on January 1, 2023. The assets sold as part of the transaction meet the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and were measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. There were no impairment charges for the assets held for sale. The sale does not represent a strategic shift for us and does not qualify for reporting as a discontinued operation for financial statement purposes.

The major classes of assets included in Assets held for sale consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 2022

Trade receivables, net

$

5.7

Software, net

3.2

Goodwill

 

69.4

Other current and non-current assets

 

1.0

Total assets held for sale

$

79.3

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives of the related assets: 30 years for buildings and 3 to 7 years for furniture, fixtures and computer equipment. Leasehold improvements

63

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the initial term of the respective lease or the estimated useful life of such asset.

Software, Net

Software, net includes internally developed software, purchased software, software acquired in business combinations and asset acquisitions, less accumulated amortization. Software acquired in business combinations is recorded at its fair value and amortized using the straight-line method over its remaining estimated useful life. Purchased software is recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life. The useful life of software acquired in business combinations and purchased software ranges from 3 to 10 years.

Internal development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 985, Software, Subtopic 20, Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed, or ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, Subtopic 40, Internal-Use Software. Judgment is required in determining the classification of our development costs under these two topics, especially for development of new software products in which marketing strategies may still be in development. We may rely on past practice in cases where that provides the best evidence.

For software products to be sold, leased or marketed, all costs incurred to establish technological feasibility are research and development costs and are expensed as they are incurred. Costs incurred subsequent to establishing technological feasibility, such as developers’ salaries, related payroll costs and costs of independent contractors, are capitalized and amortized on a product-by-product basis commencing on the date of general release to clients. We do not capitalize any costs once the product is available for general release to clients. Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established. The timing of when various research and development projects become technologically feasible or ready for release can cause fluctuations in the amount of research and development costs that are expensed or capitalized in any given period. Generally, we amortize capitalized costs on a straight-line basis. However, we use an accelerated amortization method equal to the ratio of revenues generated by the software solution in the current year as a percentage of the estimated current and future revenues over its estimated useful life if that ratio is greater than the percentage to be amortized using the straight-line method.

For internal-use software products, internal and external costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as they are incurred. Internal and external costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized commencing on the date the product is ready for its intended use. We do not capitalize any costs once the software is ready for its intended use.

Amortization expense for software is recorded using the straight-line method over the software’s estimated useful life, generally ranging from 5 to 10 years. In January 2023, we completed an assessment of the useful lives of certain origination software solutions. Due to investments in the software and changes in technology, we determined we should increase the estimated useful lives of certain origination software solutions from 5 years to 7 years. This change in accounting estimate will be effective as of January 1, 2023.

Other Intangible Assets, Net

Other intangible assets, net consist primarily of client relationships that are recorded in connection with acquisitions at their fair value based on the results of a valuation analysis, less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets, other than those with indefinite lives, are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years from the acquisition date using either a straight-line or accelerated method. Client relationships are amortized using an accelerated method that takes into consideration expected client attrition rates over a period of up to 10 years from the acquisition date.

Our property records database, which is an intangible asset not subject to amortization, is reviewed for impairment at least annually and is included in Other non-current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to section“Other Non-Current Assets” below.

64

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Impairment Testing

Long-lived assets, including property and equipment, software and other intangible assets with definite useful lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. We did not have any events or circumstances indicating impairment of our long-lived assets for the years presented.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. In evaluating the recoverability of goodwill, we consider the amount of excess fair value over the carrying value of each reporting unit, the period of time since a reporting unit’s last quantitative test, and other factors to determine whether to perform a qualitative test. When performing an annual goodwill impairment analysis based on a review of qualitative factors, we evaluate if events and circumstances exist that lead to a determination that the fair value of each reporting unit is more likely than not greater than its carrying amount. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a quantitative impairment test. The quantitative test includes determining the fair value of a reporting unit based on a weighted average of multiple valuation methods, primarily a combination of an income approach and a market approach, which are Level 3 and Level 2 inputs, respectively. The income approach includes the present value of estimated future cash flows, while the market approach uses earnings multiples of similar guideline public companies or of similar guideline industry transactions. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired and further testing is not required. We did not have any events or circumstances indicating impairment of our goodwill during the years presented.

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

Investments in entities that we have the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are recorded at the initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and our share of earnings or losses and distributions. We record our share of equity-based compensation expense of unconsolidated affiliates as an adjustment to our investment with a related adjustment to our equity. We determined that cash dividends received from our equity method investment represent a return on investment and are recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of our investment and classified as cash flows from operating activities on our Consolidated Statements of Cash flows.

On July 6, 2020, our investment in Star Parent, L.P. (“Star Parent”), a former non-wholly owned subsidiary (and former parent of Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (“DNB”)) was exchanged for an investment in DNB in conjunction with their initial public offering (“DNB IPO”). We own less than 20% of DNB but are considered to have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, primarily through our investment in DNB and an agreement with certain other DNB investors pursuant to which we agreed to collectively vote together on matters related to the election of DNB directors for a period of three years following the DNB IPO. For these reasons, we continue to account for our investment using the equity method of accounting. Our investment in DNB is recorded within Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and related earnings and losses, including the related earnings and losses of our investment in Star Parent for the year ended December 31, 2020, are recorded in Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings. Refer to Note 4 – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates for additional information.

65

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Deferred Contract Costs, Net

We capitalize incremental contract acquisition costs that relate directly to an existing contract or a specific anticipated contract and are expected to be recovered. Costs that would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained are expensed as incurred. As a practical expedient, we expense incremental costs of obtaining a contract if the amortization period of the asset would be one year or less.

We also consider whether to capitalize costs to fulfill a contract that may be incurred before we commence performance on an obligation. These costs represent incremental, recoverable external costs and certain internal costs that are directly related to the contract and are primarily associated with costs of resources involved in installation of systems, processes and data conversion.

Deferred contract costs are amortized on a systematic basis consistent with the transfer to the client of the solutions or services to which the asset relates. We consider the explicit term of the contract with the client, expected renewals and the rate of change related to our solutions in determining the amortization period, which ranges from 5 to 10 years.

In the event indications exist that a deferred contract cost asset related to a particular contract may not be recoverable, undiscounted estimated cash flows of the total period over which economic benefits for providing the related products or services are expected to be received are projected and compared to the unamortized deferred contract cost balance. If the projected cash flows and any unrecognized revenues are not adequate to recover the unamortized cost, an impairment charge would be recorded to reduce the carrying amount to the contract’s net realizable value, including any termination fees provided for under the contract, in the period such a determination is made.

Amortization expense for deferred contract costs is included in Depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings. Refer to the "Depreciation and Amortization" section below.

Leases

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments according to the arrangement. Operating and finance lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized as of the lease commencement date based on the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. We use the implicit rate when it is readily determinable. Otherwise, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available as of the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The lease term we use for the valuation of our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise those options. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. From time to time, we may abandon one or more of our leased assets. Upon abandonment, we accelerate the amortization of right-of-use assets within lease expense.

Right-of-use assets for our operating leases are included in Other non-current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to the “Other Non-Current Assets” section below. Right-of-use assets for our finance leases are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7 — Property and Equipment. For discussion of our operating and finance lease liabilities refer to Note 11 — Long-Term Debt and Note 14 — Leases.

66

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Other Non-Current Assets

Other non-current assets consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

    

2021

Contract assets, net

$

107.9

$

80.2

Property records database

60.5

60.6

Right-of-use assets

 

24.8

 

32.9

Deferred compensation plan related assets

 

23.4

 

25.2

Contract credits

 

23.2

 

23.6

Prepaid expenses

 

4.4

 

4.5

Other

 

2.0

 

3.3

Other non-current assets

$

246.2

$

230.3

Non-current contract assets, net includes an allowance for estimated credit losses of $6.6 million and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Trade Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities

Trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

    

2021

Trade accounts payable

$

11.0

$

7.9

Lease liabilities, current

8.7

10.8

Other taxes payable and accrued

 

6.1

 

4.8

Accrued interest

 

12.6

 

12.3

Accrued client liabilities

2.6

3.8

Other

 

25.5

 

24.9

Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

66.5

$

64.5

Deferred Revenues

Deferred revenues, or contract liabilities, represent our obligation to transfer products or services to our clients for which we have received consideration, or an amount of consideration is due, from the client. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, revenues recognized related to the amount included in the Deferred revenues balance at the beginning of each year were $78.4 million, $48.9 million and $49.5 million, respectively.

Other Non-Current Liabilities

Other non-current liabilities consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

    

2021

Lease liabilities, non-current (Note 14)

$

17.4

$

26.4

Deferred compensation plan

21.4

24.4

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps (Note 11)

13.9

Other

9.1

14.0

Other non-current liabilities

$

47.9

$

78.7

67

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Loss Contingencies

ASC Topic 450, Contingencies, requires that we accrue for loss contingencies associated with outstanding litigation, claims and assessments, as well as unasserted claims for which management has determined it is probable that a loss contingency exists and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Refer to Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies. Legal fees are expensed as incurred.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

Prior to February 15, 2022, Optimal Blue Holdco was a non-wholly owned subsidiary and considered a VIE. We were the primary beneficiary of Optimal Blue Holdco through our controlling interest and our rights under the Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Optimal Blue Holdco dated November 24, 2020 (the “OB Holdco LLC Agreement”). As such, we controlled Optimal Blue Holdco and its subsidiaries, and we consolidated its financial position and results of operations. Prior to February 15, 2022, we owned 60% of Optimal Blue Holdco. Redeemable noncontrolling interests primarily represented the collective 40% equity interest in Optimal Blue Holdco owned by Cannae Holdings, LLC ("Cannae") and affiliates of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. ("THL"). As these redeemable noncontrolling interests provided for redemption features not solely within our control, they were presented outside of shareholders' equity.

On February 15, 2022 we entered into a purchasean agreement with Cannae and THL and acquired all of their issued and outstanding Class A units of Optimal Blue Holdco through Optimal Blue I, LLC (“Optimal Blue I”), a Delaware limited liability company and our wholly-owned subsidiary, in exchange for aggregate consideration of 36.4 millionCannae pursuant to which we exchanged 36,376,360 shares of DNB common stock valued at $722.5 millionas partial consideration for THL’s and $433.5 million in cash. The cash portion of the consideration is included as a financing cash outflow on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and was funded with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The aggregate consideration of $1.156 billion and number of shares of DNB common stock paid to Cannae and THL was based on the 20-day volume-weighted average trading price of DNB for the period ended on February 14, 2022. Since February 15, 2022, we own 100% of the Class A units of Optimal Blue Holdco.

Treasury Shares

Shares held in treasury are at cost. We charge the cost in excess of par value to Retained earnings when we cancel or retire treasury shares.

Revenues

We recognize revenues primarily relating to software and hosting solutions, professional services and data solutions. We are often party to multiple concurrent contracts or contracts that combine multiple solutions and services. These situations require judgment to determine if multiple contracts should be combined and accounted for as a single arrangement. In making this determination, we consider (i) the economics of each individual contract and whether or not it was negotiated on a standalone basis and (ii) if multiple promises represent a single performance obligation. Many times these arrangements include offerings from more than one segment to the same client.

At contract inception, we assess the performance obligations, or deliverables, we have agreed to provide in the contract and determine if they are individually distinct or if they should be combined with other performance obligations. We combine performance obligations when an individual performance obligation does not have standalone value to our client. For example, we typically combine the delivery of complex, proprietary implementation-related professional services with the delivery of the related software solution.

Contract modifications require judgment to determine if the modification should be accounted for as (i) a separate contract, (ii) the termination of the original contract and creation of a new contract or (iii) a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the original contract. When evaluating contract modifications, we must identify the performance obligations of the

68

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

modified contract and determine both the allocation of revenues to the remaining performance obligations and the period of recognition for each identified performance obligation.

We include any fixed consideration within our contracts as part of the total transaction price. Generally, we include an estimate of the variable amount within the total transaction price and update our assumptions over the duration of the contract. We do not include taxes collected from clients and remitted to governmental authorities. The transaction price is allocated to our performance obligations in proportion to their relative standalone selling prices (“SSP”). SSP is the price for which we would sell a distinct solution or service separately to a client and is determined at contract inception. For a majority of our revenues, we have observable selling prices for our related solutions and services. However, if observable selling prices are not available, establishing SSP requires significant judgment. The estimated SSP considers all reasonably available information, including market conditions, demands, trends, our specific factors and information about the client or class of client. The adjusted market approach is generally used for new solutions and services or when observable inputs are limited or not available.

The following describes the nature of our primary sources of revenue and the related revenue recognition policies:

Software Solutions Revenues

Software solutions revenues are primarily comprised of software as a service (“SaaS”) offerings for various platforms that perform processing and workflow management as well as provide data and analytics. To a lesser extent, we sell software licenses where hosting services may or may not be included in the arrangement. Contracts for software and hosting solutions typically span five to seven years.

For our SaaS offerings, we promise our clients to stand ready to provide continuous access to our processing platforms and perform an unspecified quantity of processing services for a specified term. For this reason, processing services are generally viewed as a stand-ready performance obligation comprised of a series of distinct daily services. We typically satisfy these performance obligations over time as the services are provided. A time-elapsed output method is used to measure progress because our efforts are expended evenly throughout the period given the nature of the promise is a stand-ready service. We evaluate our variable payment terms related to these revenues, and they generally meet the criteria for allocating variable consideration entirely to one or more, but not all, performance obligations in a contract. Accordingly, when the criteria are met, variable amounts based on the number and type of services performed during a period are allocated to and recognized on the day in which we perform the related services. Fixed fees for processing services are generally recognized ratably over the contract period.

Our software licenses generally have significant standalone functionality to our clients upon delivery. Our software licenses are generally considered distinct performance obligations, and revenue allocated to the software license is typically recognized at a point in time upon delivery of the license.

In conjunction with software licenses, we commonly provide our clients with additional services such as maintenance as well as associated implementation and other professional services related to the software license. Maintenance is typically comprised of technical support and unspecified updates and upgrades. We generally satisfy these performance obligations evenly using a time-elapsed output method over the contract term given there is no discernible pattern of performance. When a software license contract also includes professional services that provide significant modification or customization of the software license, we combine the software license and professional services into a single performance obligation, and revenues for the combined performance obligation are recognized as the professional services are provided consistent with the methods described below for professional services revenues.

We have contracts where the licensed software is offered in conjunction with hosting services. The licensed software may be considered a separate performance obligation from the hosting services if the client can take possession of the software during the contractual term without incurring a significant penalty and if it is feasible for the client to run the software on its own infrastructure or hire a third party to host the software. If the licensed software and hosting services are separately identifiable, license revenue is recognized when the hosting services commence and it is within the client’s

69

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

control to obtain a copy of the software, and hosting revenue is recognized using the time-elapsed output method as the service is provided. If the software license is not separately identifiable from the hosting service, then the related revenues for the combined performance obligation is recognized ratably over the hosting period.

Professional Services Revenues

Professional services revenues are generally comprised of implementation, conversion, programming, training and consulting services associated with our SaaS and licensed software agreements. Professional services such as training, dedicated teams and consulting services are generally distinct. Distinct professional services revenues are primarily billed on a time and materials basis, and revenues are recognized over time as the services are performed. A portion of our professional services revenues are derived from contracts for dedicated personnel resources who are often working full-time at a client site and under the client’s direction. These revenues generally recur as contracts are renewed.

In assessing whether implementation services provided on SaaS or licensed software agreements are a distinct performance obligation, we consider whether the services are both capable of being distinct (i.e., the client can benefit from the services alone or in combination with other resources that are readily available to the client) and distinct within the context of the contract (i.e., separately identifiable from the other performance obligations in the contract). Professional services that are not distinct from an associated solution or offering are recognized over the common measure of progress for the overall performance obligation (typically a time-elapsed output measure that corresponds to the period over which the solution or offering is made available to the client).

Data Solutions Revenues

Revenues from data solutions are primarily from licenses for new and historical property ownership data and valuation-related analytical services and are generally distinct. License fees are recognized at a point in time upon delivery. Revenues allocated to data updates are recognized ratably over the period the updates are provided. In addition, to the extent that we provide continuous access to data through a hosted software platform, we recognize revenues ratably over the contract term.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses include all costs, excluding depreciation and amortization, incurred by us to produce revenues. Operating expenses primarily include compensation costs, including equity-based compensation and benefits, software and hardware maintenance costs, professional services fees, rent-related costs, software subscription costs and cloud computing costs. Equity-based compensation is included within Corporate and Other in Note 19 — Segment Information.

General and administrative expenses, which are primarily included in Operating expenses within Corporate and Other in Note 19 — Segment Information, include compensation costs, including benefits and equity-based compensation, professional services fees, insurance, rent-related costs, software subscription costs and other costs associated with the enterprise risk, finance, human resources, marketing, legal and other support functions.

Equity-Based Compensation

We expense employee equity-based payments under ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, which requires compensation cost, measured using the grant date fair value of equity-based payments, to be recognized over the requisite service period, which generally equals the vesting period. For awards with a performance condition, we recognize compensation cost under the graded vesting method over the requisite service period of the award, which at times results in accelerated recognition of the cost. We do not recognize compensation cost if the performance condition is not considered probable of achievement. If at any point we determine that the performance condition is improbable of achievement, we reverse any previously recognized compensation cost for that award.

70

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The fair value of our restricted stock awards is measured based on the closing market price of our stock on the grant date. The fair value of the Optimal Blue Holdco profit interest units (“OB PIUs”) is measured using the Black-Scholes model. Income tax effects of awards are recordedCannae’s minority interests in our Consolidated Statementssubsidiary Optimal Blue. For additional information on this transaction, see “Purchase of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings when the awards vest or are settled. We account for forfeitures as they occur.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization includes the following (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

    

2020

Other intangible assets

$

143.1

$

159.1

$

86.6

Software

143.1

131.3

110.4

Property and equipment

 

38.4

 

40.4

 

39.8

Deferred contract costs

 

45.0

 

34.2

 

33.9

Total

$

369.6

$

365.0

$

270.7

Deferred contract costs amortization for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 includes accelerated amortization of $5.9 million, $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

Transition and Integration Costs

Transition and integration costs primarily consists of costs related to the ICE Transaction, costs associated with acquisitions including costs pursuant to purchase agreements and expense reduction initiatives.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net consists primarily of interest expense on our borrowings, amortization of our debt issuance costs and original issue discount, payments on our interest rate swaps, commitment fees on our revolving credit facility and administrative agent fees net of capitalized interest and interest income. Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the expected repayment period of the debt.

Income Taxes

Black Knight is treated asMinority Interests in Optimal Blue” below. As a corporation under applicable federal and state income tax laws. We are subject to income tax in the U.S. and certain state jurisdictions in which we operate and record the tax effects as a part of the tax accounting process of preparing the consolidated financial statements. Our India subsidiary is subject to income tax in India.

The tax accounting process involves calculating current tax expense together with assessing basis differences resulting from differing recognition of items for income tax and GAAP accounting purposes. These differences result in current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable earnings in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws in future periods, if any, is reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period enacted. We must then assess the likelihood that deferred income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable earnings and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. We believe that based on our historical pattern of taxable earnings, projections of future earnings, tax planning strategies, reversing taxable timing differences and other relevant evidence, we will produce sufficient earnings in the future to realize recorded deferred income tax assets. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase an allowance in a period, we would reflect the increase as expense within Income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.

71

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Determination of income tax expense requires estimates and can involve complex issues that may require an extended period to resolve. Further, the estimated level of annual earnings before income tax can cause the overall effective income tax rate to vary from period to period. We believe our tax positions comply with applicable tax law, and we adequately provide for any known tax contingencies. Final determination of prior-year tax liabilities, either by settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitations, could be materially different than estimates reflected in assets and liabilities and historical income tax expense. The outcome of these final determinations could have a material effect on our income tax expense, net earnings or cash flows in the period that determination is made.

We record interest and penalties related to income taxes, if any, as a component of Income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings. Refer to Note 18 — Income Taxes for additional information.

Earnings Per Share

Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing Net earnings attributable to Black Knight by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings per share includes the effect of unvested restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”) and OB PIUs. Refer to Note 5 — Earnings Per Share for more information.

Business Acquisitions

We include the results of operations of acquired businesses beginning on the respective acquisition dates. The purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date, with the excess recorded as goodwill. Measurement period adjustments to provisional purchase price allocations are recognized in the period in which they are determined, with the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income resulting from such changes calculated as if the accounting had been completed on the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.

The fair value of the acquired Software and Other intangible assets are primarily determined using a third-party valuation based on significant estimates and assumptions, including Level 3 inputs, which are judgmental in nature. These estimates and assumptions include the projected timing and amount of future cash flows and discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in the future cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Pronouncements

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial InstrumentsCredit Losses, as well as several other related updates, which were codified as ASC Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ("ASC 326"). The new standard requires companies to immediately recognize an estimate of credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of the financial assets included in the scope of this standard. Our financial assets that are included in the scope of these updates are primarily trade receivables and contract assets. The primary effect of adopting the new standard relates to the changes intransaction, our estimated credit losses and providing additional disclosures about our financial assets that are included in the scope of this new standard. We adopted ASC 326 on January 1, 2020 using a modified retrospective approach. The effect of this adoption was an adjustment of $1.1 million, net of tax, to our opening Retained earnings on our Consolidated Statements of Equity.

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers. This update requires contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in business combinations to be recognized and measured in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenues from Contracts with Customers. It is expected that an acquirer will generally recognize and measure acquired contract assets and contract liabilities in a manner consistent with how the acquiree recognized and measured them in its pre-acquisition

72

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

financial statements. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022 with early adoption permitted, including in an interim period. We early adopted this update in the fourth quarter of 2021 and applied its amendments to each of our 2021 acquisitions. This update did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

(3)Business Acquisitions

2021 Acquisitions

On March 16, 2021, we completed the acquisition of the technology assets and business of NexSpring Financial, LLC (“NexSpring”), which is reported within our Software Solutions segment, to broaden our ability to serve mortgage brokers.

On May 17, 2021, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity interests in eMBS, Inc. (“eMBS”), a leading data and analytics aggregator for residential mortgage-backed securities, which is reported within our Data & Analytics segment, to solidify and further expand our market leadership in solutions and data for agency-backed securities.

On July 7, 2021, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity interests in TOMN Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Top of Mind”), which is reported within our Software Solutions segment. Top of Mind is the developer of SurefireSM, a leading customer relationship management and marketing automation system for the mortgage industry.

2020 Acquisitions

On March 3, 2020, we completed the acquisition of Collateral Analytics, LLC (“Collateral Analytics”), which is reported within our Data and Analytics segment because it enhances our real estate solutions and automated valuation model offerings.

On August 27, 2020, we completed the acquisition of DocVerify®, which is reported within our Software Solutions segment and helps accelerate Black Knight’s goal of digitizing the entirety of the real estate and mortgage continuum as DocVerify®’s trusted and proven digital document verification capabilities are integrated with Expedite®Close, our digital closing platform.

On July 26, 2020, we entered into a definitive equity purchase agreement with affiliates of private equity firm GTCR, LLC, to purchase Optimal Blue, a leading provider of secondary market solutions and actionable data services. We also entered into forward purchase agreements with Cannae and affiliates of THL (collectively, the "FPAs"), whereby Cannae and affiliates of THL agreed to each acquire 20% of the equity interests of a newly formed entity, Optimal Blue Holdco, for a purchase price of $289.0 million. Optimal Blue Holdco was formed for the purpose of acquiring Optimal Blue.

On September 15, 2020, we completed a series of transactions and completed the acquisition of Optimal Blue. In connection with the acquisition of Optimal Blue, we contributed $762.0 million in cash and Compass Analytics, LLC ("Compass Analytics") to Optimal Blue Holdco. In addition, Black Knight InfoServ, LLC ("BKIS"), our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, provided $500.0 million in cash in exchange for a note with Optimal Blue Holdco (the "OB Holdco Note"). The OB Holdco Note bears interest at a rate of 6.125%, which is payable on a semi-annual basis beginning March 1, 2021, and matures on September 1, 2028. Immediately prior to the closing of the Optimal Blue acquisition, we, together with BKT, our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, Optimal Blue Holdco, Cannae and THL, entered into the initial OB Holdco LLC Agreement. As of December 31, 2021, we owned 60% of Optimal Blue Holdco.

Optimal Blue is reported within our Software Solutions segment because it enhances our robust set of software solutions and includes additional product, pricing and eligibility capabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a measurement period adjustment of $8.1 million primarily reducing deferred income taxes for certain book and tax basis differences as we completed the tax return filings for the pre-acquisition period. On February 15, 2022, we acquired the remaining outstanding Class A units in Optimal Blue Holdco. Refer to Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies for additional information.

73

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Total cash paid net of cash acquired for our 2020 acquisitions was $1,869.4 million.

Allocation of purchase price

The following table summarizes the total purchase price consideration and the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including the effect of measurement period adjustments (in millions):

2021

Acquisitions(1)

Cash paid

$

307.6

Contingent consideration(2)

4.4

Less: cash acquired

 

(5.0)

Total consideration, net

$

307.0

Software

$

34.9

Other intangible assets(3)

 

80.0

Goodwill

 

211.9

Other current and non-current assets

 

4.2

Total assets acquired

 

331.0

Deferred income taxes

 

15.6

Current and other non-current liabilities

 

8.4

Total liabilities assumed

 

24.0

Net assets acquired

$

307.0

(1)During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a measurement period adjustment of $0.1 million primarily related to deferred income taxes for certain book and tax basis differences as we completed the tax return filings for the pre-acquisition period.
(2)The NexSpring purchase agreement requires us to pay additional cash consideration based on NexSpring revenues recognized over the three-year period subsequent to the acquisition.
(3)Other intangible assets primarily consist of client relationships assets of $76.3 million.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we incurred direct transaction costs of $3.8 million and $15.0 million in connection with our 2021 acquisitions and the acquisition of Optimal Blue in 2020, respectively. Transaction costs are included in Transition and integration costs on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.

For the period September 15, 2020 through December 31, 2020, Optimal Blue’s revenues of $37.6 million and pre-tax loss of $19.0 million are included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.

Unaudited Pro Forma Results

Our 2021 and 2020 acquisitions, excluding Optimal Blue, were not material individually or in the aggregate to our consolidated financial statements.

Unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, assuming the Optimal Blue acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2020, are presented below (in millions, except per share amounts):

    

December 31, 2020

Revenues

$

1,320.0

Net earnings

$

200.6

74

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The unaudited pro forma results include certain pro forma adjustments that were directly attributable to the acquisition, assuming the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2020, including the following:

additional amortization expense that would have been recognized relating to the acquired intangible assets;
adjustments to interest expense to reflect the additional debt we incurred related to partially finance the acquisition; and
a reduction of expenses for acquisition-related transaction costs of $15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(4)Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

DNB Investment

DNB is a leading global provider of business decisioning data and analytics. On July 6, 2020, our investment in Star Parent was exchanged for an investment in DNB in conjunction with the DNB IPO. As of July 6, 2020, our ownership interest in DNB outstanding common stock was 13.0%.

On January 8, 2021, DNB completed its acquisition of Bisnode Business Information Group AB (the “Bisnode acquisition”). In connection with the Bisnode acquisition, DNB issued 6.2 million shares of common stock, which resulted in a decrease in our ownership interest in DNB to 12.8% at that time.

On February 15, 2022, we exchanged approximately 36.4 million shares of DNB common stock in connection with our acquisition of the remaining Class A units in Optimal Blue Holdco from Cannae and THL. The number of shares of DNB common stock was valued at $722.5 million based on the 20-day volume-weighted average trading price of DNB for the period ended February 14, 2022. We recognized a gain of $305.4 million, net of tax of $102.6 million, relatedreduced to this transaction. As of December 31, 2022, we owned 18.5 million18,473,610 shares of DNB common stock for an ownership interest ofor approximately 4% of DNB’s outstanding common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, we received quarterly cash dividends for a total of $1.8 million related to our ownership in DNB common stock. On February 9, 2023 DNB declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share payable on March 16, 2023 to DNB’s shareholders of record as of March 2, 2023.

As of December 31, 2022, DNB’s closing share price was $12.26, and the fair value of our investment in DNB was $226.5 million before tax. Assuming a statutory tax rate of 25.5%, the estimated after-tax value of our investment in DNB was $211.0 million.

Summarized consolidated financial information for DNB is presented below (in millions):

December 31, 

2022

2021

Current assets

$

703.9

$

718.0

Non-current assets

 

8,768.0

 

9,279.2

Total assets

$

9,471.9

$

9,997.2

Current liabilities, including short-term debt

$

1,102.6

$

1,004.9

Non-current liabilities

 

4,860.9

 

5,247.0

Total liabilities

 

5,963.5

 

6,251.9

Total equity

 

3,508.4

 

3,745.3

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

9,471.9

$

9,997.2

75

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

 

2020

Revenue

$

2,224.6

$

2,165.6

$

1,738.7

Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes and equity in net income of affiliates

$

(27.2)

$

(45.2)

$

(226.4)

Net income (loss)

$

4.1

$

(65.9)

$

(111.6)

Net loss attributable to DNB

$

(2.3)

$

(71.7)

$

(180.6)

The summarized consolidated financial information above was derived from DNB’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, DNB eliminated the one-month reporting lag for its subsidiaries outside North America and aligned the fiscal year-end for all its subsidiaries to December 31. DNB applied this change in their accounting policy retrospectively. The effect of this change in accounting policy did not have a material impact to our results of operations or financial condition and is included in our accounting for our investment in DNB for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax consists of the following (in millions):

Year ended December 31,

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

$

1.3

$

(7.3)

$

(26.1)

Gain related to DNB investment, net of tax

305.4

Non-cash gain related to DNB's issuance of common stock, net of tax

 

 

9.9

 

88.2

Sale of an equity method investment, net of tax(1)

5.0

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

$

306.7

$

2.6

$

67.1

(1)On May 15, 2020, we sold our interest in an equity method investment and recognized a gain of $5.0 million, net of tax, which is included in Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2020. In connection with the sale, we received $8.4 million in cash at closing and recorded a receivable of $1.8 million. In June 2021, we received the remaining $1.8 million. The original investment was not material to Black Knight.

(5)Earnings Per Share

Diluted net earnings per share include the effect of unvested restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”) and OB PIUs. In 2020, the outstanding OB PIUs were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations because the effect of their inclusion was antidilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except per share amounts):

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

    

2020

Basic:

  

 

  

 

  

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

$

452.5

$

207.9

$

264.1

Shares used for basic net earnings per share:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding

 

154.4

 

155.1

 

152.0

Basic net earnings per share

$

2.93

$

1.34

$

1.74

Diluted:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

$

452.5

$

207.9

$

264.1

Shares used for diluted net earnings per share:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding

 

154.4

 

155.1

 

152.0

Dilutive effect of unvested restricted shares of common stock and OB PIUs

 

1.2

 

0.7

 

0.9

Weighted average shares of common stock, diluted

 

155.6

 

155.8

 

152.9

Diluted net earnings per share

$

2.91

$

1.33

$

1.73

76

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

.

(6)Related Party Transactions

Our service arrangements with related parties are priced within the range of prices we offer to third parties. We believe the amounts earned from or charged by us under each of the following arrangements are fair and reasonable. However, the amounts we earned or that were charged under these arrangements were not negotiated at arm’s length and may not represent the terms that we might have obtained from an unrelated third party.

DNB

DNB is considered to be a related party primarily due to the combination of our investment in DNB and our Executive Chairman, who is also the Chief Executive Officer of DNB. Refer to Note 4 — Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates for additional details.

In June 2021, we entered into a five-year agreement with DNB to provide certain products and data over the term of the agreement, as well as professional services, for an aggregate fee of approximately $34 million over the term of the agreement. DuringFor the same period,year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized revenues of $7.4 million. As of December 31, 2022, related party deferred revenues related to this agreement were $6.2 million.

In June 2021, we also entered into an agreement with DNB for access to certain of their data assets for an aggregate fee of approximately $24 million over the term of the agreement. In addition, we will jointly market certain solutions and data.

In 2020, we entered into a services agreement with DNB. The agreement is cancellable upon mutual agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, we provide DNB certain support services in exchange for Related party prepaid fees in an amount of our cost plus a 10% markup.

The following is a summary of amounts related to agreements with DNB included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

    

December 31, 

2022

2021

Receivables from related parties

$

0.1

$

0.2

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

2.3

 

2.3

Deferred revenues (current)

6.2

6.2

Deferred revenues (non-current)

 

 

1.4

The following is a summarythis agreement were $2.3 million as of amounts related to agreements with DNB included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

Revenues

$

7.4

$

2.9

Operating expenses

 

4.7

 

2.3

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the amounts related to agreements with DNB included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings were less than $0.1 million.

During2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we received quarterly cash dividends totaling $1.8recognized expenses of $4.7 million from DNB. Referrelated to Note 4 – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates for additional details.

Trasimene

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we entered into a non-exclusive advisory services agreement with Trasimene Capital Management, LLC ("Trasimene") for services that may include evaluating, negotiating and closing

77

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

various acquisition, financing and strategic corporate transactions. Transaction fees for services provided are primarily based on the size of the transaction and do not exceed market rates.

Prior to June 16, 2021, Trasimene was considered a related party because the former Chairman of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) owns a controlling interest in Trasimene. As of June 16, 2021, our former Chairman retired from the Board and became our Chairman Emeritus, and Trasimene is no longer considered a related party.

During the period January 1, 2021 through June 16, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $0.5 million and $8.3 million in fees to Trasimene, respectively, for assistance with acquisitions, which are included in Transition and integration costs in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.

(7)Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, net consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Computer equipment

$

227.6

$

256.6

Buildings and improvements

 

93.4

 

90.5

Furniture, fixtures and other equipment

 

12.1

 

12.1

Land

11.9

11.9

Leasehold improvements

 

9.9

 

9.8

Property and equipment

 

354.9

 

380.9

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(211.9)

 

(226.4)

Property and equipment, net

$

143.0

$

154.5

this agreement.

(8)Software

Software, net consists of the following (in millions):

    

December 31, 

2022

2021

Internally developed software

$

1,182.9

$

1,123.6

Purchased software

 

96.3

 

94.3

Software

 

1,279.2

 

1,217.9

Accumulated amortization

 

(835.5)

 

(720.9)

Software, net

$

443.7

$

497.0

During the year ended December 31, 2020, software valued at $25.5 million was received related to agreements previously entered into in 2019 to acquire software in exchange for a combination of cash consideration and certain of our products and services. The transaction resulted in non-cash investing activity of $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

78

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Estimated amortization expense on software for the next five fiscal years is as follows (in millions):

2023(1)

    

$

136.9

2024

 

95.0

2025

 

79.1

2026

 

55.2

2027

 

40.9

(1)Assumes assets not in service as of December 31, 2022 are placed in service equally throughout the year.

(9)Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets consist of the following (in millions):

    

December 31, 2022

    

December 31, 2021

Gross carrying 

    

Accumulated 

    

Net carrying 

    

Gross carrying 

    

Accumulated 

    

Net carrying 

amount

amortization

amount

amount

amortization

amount

Client relationships

$

1,282.2

$

(819.1)

$

463.1

$

1,282.2

$

(680.6)

$

601.6

Other

 

22.5

 

(15.5)

 

7.0

 

22.5

 

(10.9)

 

11.6

Total intangible assets

$

1,304.7

$

(834.6)

$

470.1

$

1,304.7

$

(691.5)

$

613.2

Estimated amortization expense on other intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is as follows (in millions):

2023

    

$

118.5

2024

 

92.4

2025

 

77.8

2026

 

63.0

2027

 

49.2

(10)Goodwill

Goodwill consists of the following (in millions):

    

Software 

    

Data and 

    

Solutions

Analytics

Total

Balance, December 31, 2020

$

3,415.8

$

197.6

$

3,613.4

2021 acquisitions

194.7

17.3

212.0

2020 Optimal Blue acquisition

(8.1)

(8.1)

Balance, December 31, 2021

3,602.4

214.9

3,817.3

2021 Top of Mind acquisition

(0.1)

(0.1)

Assets held for sale

(69.4)

(69.4)

Balance, December 31, 2022

$

3,602.3

$

145.5

$

3,747.8

The decrease in goodwill duringFor the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily relateswe made payments of $0.1 million for other DNB solutions.

DNB Letter Agreement

In connection with DNB’s initial public offering (the DNB IPO) in July 2020, we entered into a letter agreement with the other members of the investment consortium, including Bilcar, LLC, Cannae and THL. Pursuant to the assets heldletter agreement, we have agreed for salea period of three years to vote all of our shares as a group in all matters related to the election of directors, including to elect five individuals to the DNB board of directors, including Messrs. Hagerty and Rao, as well as DNB directors William P. Foley, II, Chinh Chu and Richard Massey.

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the DNB IPO, we entered into a registration rights agreement with DNB and the other members of the investment consortium, including Bilcar, LLC, Cannae and THL. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we have the right to demand that DNB register the DNB shares of common stock that we own. The registration rights agreement also provides piggyback registration rights, subject to certain exceptions.

Purchase of Minority Interests in Optimal Blue

On February 15, 2022, we entered into a Purchase Agreement and completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of our Optimal Blue subsidiary owned by Cannae and certain investment entities affiliated with THL (the Optimal Blue Transaction), in exchange for aggregate consideration of (y) $433,500,000 in cash, funded with borrowings under our revolving credit facility and (z) 36,376,360 shares of DNB common stock owned by Black Knight. The aggregate consideration and number of shares of DNB common stock paid to Cannae and THL in connection with the transaction was based on the 20-day VWAP trading price of DNB for the TitlePointperiod ending on February 14, 2022. Following the consummation of the Transaction, Black Knight indirectly owns 100% of the issued and outstanding Class A Units of Optimal Blue Holdco. Pursuant to authority delegated by the board of directors, the Optimal Blue Transaction was considered and approved by a Special Committee of independent directors composed of Joseph M. Otting, David K. Hunt and Nancy L. Shanik.

Other Related Party Transactions

Noah Witte, the son-in-law of Mr. Nackashi, is employed by a subsidiary of Black Knight as a manager in our Servicing Technologies division. In 2022, Mr. Witte’s gross earnings were $133,193, which is consistent with other employees holding similar titles at the Company. He also received health and other benefits customarily provided to similarly situated employees.

Audit Committee Approval

Our audit committee has reviewed and approved each of the transactions described above in accordance with the terms of our Code of Conduct related to the approval of related party transactions.

51

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Pursuant to our codes of ethics, a “conflict of interest” occurs when an individual’s private interest interferes or appears to interfere with our interests, and can arise when a director, officer or employee takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her work objectively and effectively. Anything that would present a conflict for a director, officer or employee would also likely present a conflict if it is related to a member of his or her family. Our code of ethics states that clear conflict of interest situations involving directors, executive officers and other employees who occupy supervisory positions or who have discretionary authority in dealing with any third party specified below may include the following:

·Any significant ownership interest in any supplier or customer;

·Any consulting or employment relationship with any client, supplier or competitor; and

·Selling anything to us or buying anything from us, except on the same terms and conditions as comparable directors, officers or employees are permitted to so purchase or sell.

It is our policy to review all relationships and transactions in which we and our directors or executive officers (or their immediate family members) are participants in order to determine whether the director or officer in question has or may have a direct or indirect material interest. Our Chief Compliance Officer, together with our legal staff, is primarily responsible for developing and implementing procedures to obtain the necessary information from our directors and officers regarding transactions to/from related persons. Any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest must be discussed promptly with our Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer, together with our legal staff, then reviews the transaction or relationship, and considers the material terms of the transaction or relationship, including the importance of the transaction or relationship to us, the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction or relationship, whether the transaction or relationship would likely impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in our best interest, and any other factors such officer deems appropriate. After reviewing the facts and circumstances of each transaction, the Chief Compliance Officer, with assistance from the legal staff, determines whether the director or officer in question has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction and whether or not to approve the transaction in question.

With respect to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (who also serves as our principal accounting officer) and Corporate Controller, our codes of ethics require that each such officer must:

·Discuss any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest with our General Counsel;

·In the case of our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller, obtain the prior written approval of our General Counsel for all material transactions or relationships that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest; and

·In the case of our Chief Executive Officer, obtain the prior written approval of the audit committee for all material transactions that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest.

In the case of any material transactions or relationships involving our Chief Financial Officer or our Corporate Controller, the General Counsel must submit a list of any approved material transactions semiannually to the audit committee for its review.

Under SEC rules, certain transactions in which we are or will be a participant and in which our directors, executive officers, certain shareholders and certain other related persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest are required to be disclosed in this related person transactions section of our proxy statement. In addition to the procedures above, our audit committee reviews and approves or ratifies any such transactions that are required to be disclosed. The committee makes these decisions based on its consideration of all relevant factors. The review may be before or after the commencement of the transaction. Refer

If a transaction is reviewed and not approved or ratified, the committee may recommend a course of action to Note 1 – Basisbe taken.

52

Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The audit committee has appointed KPMG LLP to audit the consolidated financial statements of Presentationthe Company for the 2022 fiscal year. KPMG LLP has continuously acted as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company and Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies. The decrease in goodwill duringour predecessors commencing with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 related2007.

For services rendered to a measurement period adjustment primarily related to deferred income taxes related to the acquisition of Optimal Blue. Refer to Note 3 – Business Acquisitions.

79

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(11)Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions):

    

December 31, 

2022

2021

Term A Loan

$

1,121.2

$

1,150.0

Revolving Credit Facility

 

545.0

 

256.0

Senior Notes

 

1,000.0

 

1,000.0

Other

 

5.0

 

8.9

Total long-term debt principal

 

2,671.2

 

2,414.9

Less: current portion of long-term debt

 

(33.6)

 

(32.5)

Long-term debt before debt issuance costs and discount

 

2,637.6

 

2,382.4

Less: debt issuance costs and discount

 

(15.9)

 

(19.8)

Long-term debt, net of current portion

$

2,621.7

$

2,362.6

Principal Maturities of Debt

As of December 31, 2022, principal maturities are as follows (in millions):

2023

    

$

33.7

2024

57.5

2025

 

57.5

2026

 

1,522.5

Thereafter

 

1,000.0

Total

$

2,671.2

2021 Credit Agreement

On March 10, 2021, our indirect subsidiary BKIS entered into a second amended and restated credit and guaranty agreement (the “2021 Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, the guarantors party thereto, the other agents party thereto and the lenders party thereto. The 2021 Credit Agreement replaced the previous 2018 amended and restated credit and guaranty agreement that provided for (i) a $1,250.0 million term loan A facility and (ii) a $750.0 million revolving credit facility.

The 2021 Credit Agreement provides for (i) a $1,150.0 million term loan A facility (the “Term A Loan”) and (ii) a $1,000.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and, together with the Term A Loan, collectively, the “Facilities”), the proceeds of which were used to repay in full the indebtedness outstanding under the prior BKIS credit agreement. As a result of the refinancing, we recognized $2.5 million of expenseus during the year ended December 31, 2021 in Other expense, net on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.

The Facilities bear interest at rates based upon, at the option of BKIS, either (i) the base rate plus a margin of between 25 and 50 basis points depending on the total net leverage ratio of Black Knight Financial Services, LLC (“BKFS”), a Delaware limited liability company and the direct parent company of BKIS, and its restricted subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (the “Consolidated Leverage Ratio”) and (ii) the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of between 125 and 150 basis points depending on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio. In addition, BKIS pays an unused commitment fee of between 15 and 20 basis points on the undrawn commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility, also depending on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio. The 2021 Credit Agreement also provides us with an option to choose an alternative rate of interest on or before the cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) at our election.

80

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

As of December 31, 2022, the interest rate for the Facilities was based on the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 150 basis points. We had $455.0 million capacity on the Revolving Credit Facility, and the unused commitment fee was 20 basis points. The interest rates on the Term A Loan and the Revolving Credit Facility were 5.9% and 5.8%, respectively.

The Facilities are guaranteed by BKIS’s wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries, as defined by the 2021 Credit Agreement, and BKFS, and are secured by associated collateral agreements that pledge a lien on the majority of BKIS’s assets and the assets of the guarantors, in each case, subject to customary exceptions.

The Term A Loan is subject to amortization of principal, payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each fiscal quarter equal to the percentage set forth below of the initial aggregate principal amount of the term loans for such fiscal quarter:

Payment Dates

Percentage

Commencing on March 31, 2022 through and including December 31, 2023

0.625

%

Commencing on March 31, 2024 through and including December 31, 2025

1.250

%

The remaining principal balance of the Term A Loan and any outstanding loans under the Revolving Credit Facility are due upon maturity on March 10, 2026.

Senior Notes

On August 26, 2020, BKIS completed the issuance and sale of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.625% senior unsecured notes (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes have a coupon rate of 3.625% and mature on September 1, 2028. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on September 1 and March 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2021. The obligations under the Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured basis by the same guarantors that guarantee the 2021 Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Guarantors”). The Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to any obligations that are secured, including obligations under the 2021 Credit Agreement, to the extent of the value of the assets securing those obligations. The Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all liabilities of BKIS’ subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Senior Notes. The net proceeds of the offering, along with cash on hand and contributions from Cannae and THL, were used to partially finance the acquisition of Optimal Blue Holdco.

The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated as of August 26, 2020, between BKIS, the Guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. BKIS may redeem up to 40% of the Senior Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings completed before September 1, 2023 at a redemption price equal to 103.625% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but not including the redemption date. In addition, at any time prior to September 1, 2023, BKIS may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but not including, the redemption date, plus the “make-whole” premium. Thereafter, BKIS may redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but not including, the redemption date. Upon the occurrence of certain events constituting a change of control, BKIS may be required to make an offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but not including, the date of purchase.

The Senior Notes are subject to customary covenants, including among others, customary events of default.

Fair Value of Long-Term Debt

The fair values ofconnection with our Facilities and Senior Notes are based upon established market prices for the securities using Level 2 inputs. The fair value of our Facilities approximates their carrying value on December 31, 2022. The fair value of our Senior Notes as of December 31, 2022 was $870.0 million compared to its carrying value of $991.1 million, net of original issue discount and debt issuance costs.

81

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Interest Rate Swaps

We enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge forecasted monthly interest rate payments on our floating rate debt. As of December 31, 2022, we had the following interest rate swap agreements (collectively, the "Swap Agreements") (in millions):

Effective dates

    

Notional amount

    

Fixed rates

April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023

$

250.0

 

2.61

%

January 31, 2019 through January 31, 2023

$

300.0

 

2.65

%

Under the terms of the Swap Agreements, we receive payments based on the 1-month LIBOR (approximately 4.38% as of December 31, 2022). During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we were billed the following interest rate swap agreements expired (in millions):

Effective dates

    

Notional amount

    

Fixed rates

September 29, 2017 through September 30, 2021

$

200.0

1.69

%

March 31, 2017 through March 31, 2022

$

200.0

 

2.08

%

fees by KPMG LLP:

We entered into the Swap Agreements to convert a portion of the interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt from variable to fixed. We designated these Swap Agreements as cash flow hedges. A portion of the amount included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss will be reclassified into Interest expense, net as a yield adjustment as interest is either paid or received on the hedged debt. The fair value of our Swap Agreements is based upon Level 2 inputs. We have considered our own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparties when determining the fair value of our Swap Agreements.

It is our policy to execute such instruments with creditworthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. We believe our interest rate swap counterparties will be able to fulfill their obligations under our agreements, and we believe we will have debt outstanding through the various expiration dates of the swaps such that the occurrence of future cash flow hedges remains probable.

The estimated fair values of our Swap Agreements are as follows (in millions):

    

December 31, 

Balance sheet accounts

2022

2021

Other current assets

$

2.2

$

Other current liabilities

$

$

1.0

Other non-current liabilities

$

$

13.9

  2022  2021 
  (In thousands) 
Audit Fees $2,271  $2,076 
Audit Related Fees $1,107  $864 
Tax Fees $1,070  $532 
All Other Fees $47  $50 

A cumulative gain of $2.2 million ($1.6 million net of tax) and cumulative loss of $14.9 million ($11.1 million net of tax) is reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

82

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Below is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on amounts recognized in Other comprehensive loss ("OCE") on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

2022

2021

2020

    

Amount of loss 

    

    

Amount of loss 

    

    

Amount of loss

Amount of gain 

reclassified from 

Amount of gain 

reclassified from 

Amount of loss 

reclassified from 

recognized  

Accumulated OCE  

recognized  

Accumulated OCE  

recognized  

Accumulated OCE 

in OCE

into Net earnings

in OCE

into Net earnings

in OCE

 into Net earnings

Swap agreements

$

8.2

$

4.5

$

1.7

$

15.3

$

(23.9)

$

12.2

As of December 31, 2022, the remaining balance in Accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be reclassified into Interest expense, net over the remaining term (less than 1 year).

(12)Audit Fees. Fair Value Measurements

Fair ValueAudit fees consisted of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair value representsfees for the amount that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined using the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access.
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include:

quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;

quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets;

inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and

inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. We believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants. The use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

83

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The following table presents our fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):

    

December 31, 2022

    

December 31, 2021

    

Carrying 

    

Fair value

    

Carrying 

    

Fair value

amount

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

amount

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 2)

$

12.2

$

12.2

$

$

$

77.1

$

77.1

$

$

Interest rate swaps (Note 11)

2.2

2.2

Liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Interest rate swaps (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

14.9

 

 

14.9

 

Contingent consideration

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.7

 

4.9

 

 

 

4.9

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

47.6

 

 

 

47.6

 

1,188.8

 

 

 

1,188.8

The fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interests and contingent consideration was primarily determined based on significant estimates and assumptions, including Level 3 inputs. The estimates and assumptions include the projected timing and amount of future cash flows and discount rates reflecting the rate inherent in the future cash flows. Refer to Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information.

The following table presents a summary of the change in fair value of our Level 3 fair value measurements (in millions):

Beginning balance, December 31, 2021

    

$

1,193.7

Contingent consideration adjustments related to prior year acquisition(1)

(4.2)

Acquisition of remaining outstanding Class A redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco (Note 2)

(1,156.0)

Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests in Optimal Blue Holdco

14.8

Ending balance, December 31, 2022

$

48.3

(1)The adjustments to contingent consideration for prior year acquisitions are included in Transition and integration costs in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.

(13)Commitments and Contingencies

Legal and Regulatory Matters

In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened litigation and regulatory matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. Our ordinary course litigation may include class action lawsuits, which make allegations related to various aspects of our business. From time to time, we also receive requests for information from various state and federal regulatory authorities, some of which take the form of civil investigative demands or subpoenas. Some of these regulatory inquiries may result in the assessment of fines for violations of regulations or settlements with such authorities requiring a variety of remedies. We believe that none of these actions depart from customary litigation or regulatory inquiries incidental to our business.

We review lawsuitsaudits, registration statements and other legal and regulatory matters (collectively "legal proceedings") on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, management bases its decision on its assessment of the ultimate outcome assuming all appeals have been exhausted. For legal proceedings where it has been determined that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable, a liability based on known facts and which represents our best estimate has been recorded. Actual losses may materially differ from the amounts recorded, and the ultimate outcome of our pending cases is generally not yet determinable. While some of these matters could be material to our operating results or cash flows for any particular period if an unfavorable outcome results, at

84

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

present, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

PennyMac Litigation

On November 5, 2019, Black Knight Servicing Technologies, LLC (“BKST”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Black Knight, filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (the “Black Knight Complaint”) against PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (“PennyMac”) in the Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County, Florida. The Black Knight Complaint includes causes of action for breach of contract and misappropriation of MSP® System trade secrets in order to develop an imitation mortgage processing system intended to replace the MSP® System. The Black Knight Complaint seeks damages for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets, injunctive relief under the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act and declaratory judgment that BKST owns all intellectual property and software developed by or on behalf of PennyMac as a result of its wrongful use of and access to the MSP® System and related trade secret and confidential information. PennyMac filed a motion to compel arbitration of the action, and the trial court granted the motion on April 6, 2020. The trial court’s order compelling arbitration was confirmed by the Florida First District Court of Appeal on January 6, 2021.

Shortly after the filing of the Black Knight Complaint, on November 6, 2019, PennyMac filed an Antitrust Complaint (the “PennyMac Complaint”) against Black Knight in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The PennyMac Complaint included causes of action for alleged monopolization and attempted monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, violation of California’s Cartwright Act, violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law and common law unfair competition under California law. The PennyMac Complaint sought equitable remedies, damages and other monetary relief, including treble and punitive damages. Generally, PennyMac alleged that Black Knight relies on various anticompetitive, unfair and discriminatory practices to maintain and to enhance its dominance in the mortgage servicing platform market and in an attempt to monopolize the platform software applications market. Black Knight moved to dismiss the PennyMac Complaint or have the action transferred to Florida based upon a forum selection clause in the agreement with BKST. On February 13, 2020, the judge granted Black Knight's motion to transfer the case to Florida and denied as moot the motion to dismiss. On April 17, 2020, PennyMac filed a notice of dismissal of this action without prejudice and indicated that they intended to bring the claims raised in the dismissed PennyMac Complaint as defenses, third party claims and/or counterclaims in arbitration. On April 23, 2020, the court entered an order dismissing the action without prejudice and directing that the clerk close the case. On April 28, 2020, PennyMac submitted this matter to the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") for arbitration. The arbitrator was confirmed by the AAA on July 21, 2020. On February 17, 2022, PennyMac filed an amended arbitration demand and Black Knight filed an answering statement on March 2, 2022.

The final arbitration hearing on both Black Knight’s trade secret case and PennyMac’s antitrust case is now scheduled to begin on March 13, 2023.

As these cases continue to evolve, it is not possible to reasonably estimate the probability that we will ultimately prevail on our lawsuit or be held liable for the violations alleged in the PennyMac Complaint, nor is it possible to reasonably estimate the ultimate gain or loss, if any, or range of gain or loss that could result from these cases.

Other Legal Matter

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a one-time gain of $18.5 millionfilings related to the resolutionCompany’s 2022 and 2021 consolidated financial statements, and audits of a legacy legal matter of Lender Processing Services, Inc. ("LPS") in Other (expense) income, net in our Consolidated Statements of Earningsthe Company’s subsidiaries required for regulatory reporting and Comprehensive Earnings.

Indemnifications and Warranties

We often agree to indemnify our clients against damages and costs resulting from claims of patent, copyright, trademark infringement or breaches of confidentiality associated with use of our software through software licensing

85

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

agreements. Historically, we have not made any payments under such indemnifications, but continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the indemnifications to identify whether a loss has occurred that is both probable and estimable that would require recognition. In addition, we warrant to clients that our software operates substantially in accordance with the software specifications. Historically, no costs have been incurred related to software warranties and none are expected in the future, and as such, no accrualscontractual purposes, including billings for warranty costs have been made.

Indemnification Agreement

We are party to a cross-indemnity agreement dated December 22, 2014 with ServiceLink Holdings, LLC ("ServiceLink"). Pursuant to this agreement, ServiceLink indemnifies us from liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from the conduct of ServiceLink’s business or any action, suit or proceeding in which we or any of our subsidiaries are named by reason of being a successor to the business of LPS and the cause of such action, suit or proceeding relates to the business of ServiceLink. In return, we indemnify ServiceLink for liabilities relating to, arising out of, or resulting from the conduct of our business.

Software Subscription, Cloud Computing and Hardware and Software Maintenance Services Agreements

We have various software subscription, cloud computing and hardware and software maintenance services agreements with vendors, which are in effect through 2026. As of December 31, 2022, payment obligations for these agreements with initial or remaining terms greater than one year are as follows (in millions):

2023

    

$

61.7

2024

 

17.7

2025

 

3.9

2026

 

3.4

Total

$

86.7

out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Actual amounts could be more or less depending on various factors such as the introduction of significant new technologies or changes in our business needs.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements other than interest rate swaps. Refer to Note 11 – Long-Term Debt.

(14)Audit Related Fees. Leases

Operating Leases

We have operating leasesAudit related fees consisted of fees for corporate offices, data centers and certain equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms of up to six years, some of which include escalation clauses, renewal optionsService Organization Control (SOC) Attestations, including billings for up to five years or termination options within one year.

86

Table of Contentsout-of-pocket expenses incurred.

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Right-of-use assets are included in Other non-current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies. Operating lease liabilities are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows (in millions):

December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Operating lease liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities

$

8.7

$

10.7

Other non-current liabilities

 

17.4

 

26.4

Total operating lease liabilities

$

26.1

$

37.1

As of December 31, 2022, maturities of operating lease liabilities were as follows (in millions):

2023

    

$

8.8

2024

 

7.8

2025

 

3.0

2026

 

2.8

2027

 

2.6

Thereafter

 

2.2

Total

 

27.2

Less: imputed interest

 

(1.1)

Total

$

26.1

Supplemental information related to operating leases is as follows (in millions, except lease term and discount rate):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Operating lease cost (1)

$

11.3

$

18.5

$

18.1

Operating cash outflows related to lease liabilities

 

10.9

 

13.7

 

12.4

Non-cash additions for right-of-use assets, net of modifications

 

0.9

 

6.4

 

21.5

December 31, 

    

2022

2021

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)

 

4.2

 

4.7

Weighted average discount rate

 

2.17

%  

2.25

%

(1)Operating lease cost includes right-of-use asset amortization as well as short-term and variable lease costs. Accelerated right-of-use asset amortization included in operating lease cost was $0.5 million, $4.0 million and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

87

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(15)Revenues

Disaggregation of Revenues

The following tables summarize revenues from contracts with clients (in millions):

    

Year ended December 31, 2022

Servicing 

    

Origination 

    

Software 

    

Data and 

    

Software

Software

Solutions

Analytics

Total

Software solutions

$

810.4

$

377.4

$

1,187.8

$

39.3

$

1,227.1

Professional services

 

72.0

52.5

 

124.5

 

3.7

 

128.2

Data solutions

 

5.2

 

5.2

 

172.4

 

177.6

Other(1)

 

1.4

15.0

 

16.4

 

2.6

 

19.0

Revenues

$

883.8

$

450.1

$

1,333.9

$

218.0

$

1,551.9

    

Year ended December 31, 2021

Servicing 

    

Origination 

    

Software 

    

Data and

    

Software

Software

Solutions

 Analytics

Total

Software solutions

$

760.0

$

347.2

$

1,107.2

$

37.0

$

1,144.2

Professional services

 

78.9

51.9

 

130.8

 

1.5

 

132.3

Data solutions

 

2.7

 

2.7

 

184.2

 

186.9

Other

 

9.3

 

9.3

 

2.5

 

11.8

Revenues

$

838.9

$

411.1

$

1,250.0

$

225.2

$

1,475.2

    

Year ended December 31, 2020

Servicing 

    

Origination 

    

Software 

    

Data and

    

Corporate 

    

Software

Software

Solutions

 Analytics

and Other

Total

Software solutions

$

700.1

$

202.6

$

902.7

$

34.1

$

$

936.8

Professional services

 

77.6

45.8

 

123.4

 

0.7

 

(0.4)

(2)

 

123.7

Data solutions

 

1.2

 

1.2

 

161.4

 

 

162.6

Other

 

12.9

 

12.9

 

2.5

 

 

15.4

Revenues

$

777.7

$

262.5

$

1,040.2

$

198.7

$

(0.4)

$

1,238.5

(1)Other revenues includes termination fees of $6.2 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022.
(2)Revenues for Corporate and Other represents deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustments recorded in accordance with GAAP.

Our Software Solutions segment offers leading software and hosting solutions that facilitate and automate many of the mission-critical business processes across the homeownership lifecycle. These solutions primarily consist of processing and workflow management software applications. Our servicing software solutions primarily include our core servicing software solution that automates loan servicing, including loan setup and ongoing processing, customer service, accounting, reporting to the secondary mortgage market and investors and web-based workflow information systems. Our origination software solutions primarily include our solutions that automate and facilitate the origination of mortgage loans, offer product, pricing and eligibility capabilities, and provide an interconnected network allowing the various parties and systems associated with lending transactions to exchange data quickly and efficiently. Professional services consists of pre-implementation and post-implementation support and services and are primarily billed on a time and materials basis. Professional services may also include dedicated teams provided as part of agreements with software and hosting solutions clients.

Our Data and Analytics segment offers data and analytics solutions to the mortgage, real estate and capital markets verticals. These solutions include property ownership data, lien data, servicing data, automated valuation models, collateral risk scores, behavioral models, a multiple listing service software solution and other data solutions.

88

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Transaction Price Allocated to Future Performance Obligations

Our disclosure of transaction price allocated to these future performance obligations excludes the following:

Volume-based fees in excess of contractual minimums and other usage-based fees to the extent they are part of a single performance obligation and meet certain variable allocation criteria;
Performance obligations that are part of a contract with an original expected duration of one year or less; and
Transactional fees based on a fixed fee per transaction when we have the right to invoice once we have completed the performance obligation.

As of December 31, 2022, the aggregate amount of the transaction price that is allocated to our future performance obligations was approximately $2.8 billion and is expected to be recognized as follows: 25% by December 31, 2023, 63% by December 31, 2025, 86% by December 31, 2027 and the rest thereafter.

(16)Tax Fees. Equity

Share Repurchase Program

On February 12, 2020, our BoardTax fees primarily consisted of Directors approved a three-year share repurchase program (“2020 Repurchase Program”) authorizing us to repurchase up to 10.0 million shares of our outstanding common stock through February 12, 2023, through open market purchases, negotiated transactions or other means, in accordance with applicable securities lawstax compliance and other restrictions.

In 2021, we repurchased 2.0 million shares of our common stock under the 2020 Repurchase Program for an aggregate of $146.7 million, at an average price per share of $73.91. We did not repurchase any shares under the 2020 Repurchase Program during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2020. There were 8.0 million shares remaining under the 2020 Repurchase Program when it expired on February 12, 2023.

consulting services.

Common Stock Offering

On June 19, 2020, we issued and sold 7,130,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC. We received net proceeds of approximately $484.6 million after deducting the underwriters’ discount of $16.3 million. We also incurred costs directly related to the offering of $0.4 million.

Omnibus Incentive Plan

The Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Black Knight Omnibus Plan") provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, other cash and stock-based awards and dividend equivalents. The Black Knight Omnibus Plan is authorized to issue up to 18.5 million shares. As of December 31, 2022, 6.1 million shares were available for future issuances. Awards granted are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

89

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

A summary of restricted shares granted for the periods presented is as follows:

Number of shares

Grant date fair 

Vesting period

Dates

    

granted

    

value per share

    

(in years)

    

Vesting criteria

February 18, 2020(1)

487,096

$

74.91

3.0

Service and Performance

May 6, 2020(1)

3,101

72.57

3.0

Service and Performance

Various other 2020 dates

37,481

59.45 - 91.64

1.0 - 3.0

Service

March 10, 2021(2)

518,219

76.00

3.0

Service and Performance

Various other 2021 dates

188,499

69.84 - 78.44

1.0 - 5.0

Service

March 10, 2022(2)

809,166

57.18

3.0

Service and Performance

Various other 2022 dates

110,604

55.05 - 70.91

1.0 - 4.0

Service

(1)Performance condition for this award has been satisfied as of December 31, 2022.
(2)This award is subject to an independent performance target for each of the three consecutive 12-month measurement periods. Vesting of each tranche is independent of the satisfaction of the annual performance target for other tranches.

Activity related to restricted stock and RSUs for the periods presented are as follows:

Weighted average 

grant date

    

Shares

    

fair value

Balance December 31, 2019

2,014,983

    

$

46.99

Granted

 

527,678

74.62

Forfeited

 

(11,811)

63.12

Vested

 

(981,752)

44.50

Balance, December 31, 2020

 

1,549,098

57.86

Granted

 

706,718

76.12

Forfeited

 

(61,900)

72.72

Vested

 

(924,127)

53.06

Balance, December 31, 2021

1,269,789

    

70.79

Granted

 

919,770

58.43

Forfeited

 

(45,807)

70.56

Vested

 

(833,234)

66.88

Balance, December 31, 2022

 

1,310,518

64.61

Equity-based compensation expense related to restricted shares and RSUs was $46.3 million, $33.0 million and $38.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Equity-based compensation includes accelerated recognitionAll Other Services. All other fees consisted of $4.2 million, $2.9 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These expenses are included in Operating expenses in the Consolidated StatementsSOC diagnostic services.

Approval of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings.Accountants’ Services

As of December 31, 2022, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted shares of our common stock is $57.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years.

Profits Interests Units

On November 24, 2020, there were 6,292 OB PIUs granted to certain members of management, directors, and certain employees, which vest over 3 years, with 100% cliff vesting after the third year. The terms of the OB PIUs provide for the grantees to participate in the excess of Optimal Blue Holdco’s fair value over the initial hurdle amount, which was the fair value of the Optimal Blue Holdco’s Class A members’ initial contributions.

90

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

If no public offering has been consummated as of the third anniversary of the acquisition of Optimal Blue, holders of the OB PIUs have an option to put their profit interests to us once per quarter for the twelve months that begins six months after the OB PIU holder’s vesting date, and once per year thereafter. In accordance with the third amendedrequirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and restated limited liability company agreementaudit related work and all non-audit work performed by KPMG LLP is approved in advance by the audit committee, including the proposed fees for such work. Our pre-approval policy provides that, unless a type of Optimal Blue Holdco, a change in control of Black Knightservice to be provided by KPMG LLP has been generally pre-approved by the audit committee, it will require specific pre-approval by the audit committee. In addition, any proposed services exceeding pre-approved maximum fee amounts also require pre-approval by the audit committee. Our pre-approval policy provides that specific pre-approval authority is delegated to our audit committee chairman, provided that the estimated fee for the proposed service does not accelerate vesting ofexceed a pre-approved maximum amount set by the OB PIUs, but triggers certain redemption rights and gives each holder of OB PIUs the right to elect that Optimal Blue Holdco redeem all of the holder’s vested and unvested OB PIUs for a redemption price determined based on fair value as determined by an appraisal process.

The units may be settled in cash or Black Knight common stock or a combination of both at our election and will be settled at the current fair value at the time we receive notice of the put election. As the OB PIUs provide for redemption features not solely within our control, we classify the redemption value outside of permanent equity in redeemable noncontrolling interests. The redemption value is equal to the difference in the per unit fair value of the underlying member units and the hurdle amount, based upon the proportionate required service period rendered to date.

The hurdle rate as of the grant date was used to determine the per unit strike price for the calculation. The risk free interest rates used in the calculation of the fair value of the OB PIUs are the rates that correspond to the weighted average expected life of the OB PIUs. The volatility was estimated based on the historical volatility of the comparable public companies’ stock prices over a term equal to the weighted average expected life of the OB PIUs. We used a weighted average risk free interest rate of 0.31%, a volatility assumption of 37.0% and an expected life of 4 years, resulting in a grant date fair value of $4,233 per profits interests unit. The grant date fair value of the OB PIUs granted on November 24, 2020 was $26.6 million.

Activity related to OB PIUs for the periods presented are as follows:committee.

Weighted average 

grant date

    

Shares

    

fair value

Balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

Granted

 

6,292

4,233

Forfeited

 

Vested

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

 

6,292

4,233

Granted

 

70

4,233

Forfeited

 

(155)

4,233

Vested

 

Balance, December 31, 2021

6,207

    

4,233

Granted

 

Forfeited

 

(38)

4,233

Vested

 

Balance, December 31, 2022

 

6,169

4,233

Equity-based compensation expense related to the OB PIUs was $8.6 million, $8.7 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested OB PIUs is $7.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.9 years.

53

(17)PART IVEmployee Stock Purchase Plan and 401(k) Plan

Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP")

The Black Knight, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Black Knight ESPP") allows our eligible employees to voluntarily make after-tax contributions ranging from 3% to 15% of eligible earnings. We contribute varying matching

91

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

amounts as specified in the Black Knight ESPP. There is a one-year holding period for contributions to the Black Knight ESPP. During the holding period, ESPP purchased shares are not eligible for sale or broker transfer.

We recorded expense of $8.2 million, $8.7 million and $7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, relating to the participation of our employees in the Black Knight ESPP.

401(k) Profit Sharing Plan

Our employees participate in the Black Knight 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “Black Knight 401(k) Plan”), a qualified 401(k) plan sponsored by our indirect subsidiary BKIS. Under the terms of the plan, as amended, eligible employees may contribute up to 40% of their pretax annual compensation, up to the amount allowed pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"). We generally match 37.5% of each dollar of employee contribution up to 6% of the employee’s total eligible compensation.

We recorded expense of $9.8 million, $8.4 million and $7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, relating to the participation of our employees in the 401(k) plans.

(18)Income Taxes

Income tax expense consists of the following (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

Current:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Federal

$

61.4

$

37.1

$

41.5

State

 

18.9

 

13.1

 

11.6

Foreign

 

1.1

 

1.0

 

1.0

Total current

 

81.4

 

51.2

 

54.1

Deferred:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Federal

 

(47.0)

 

(11.5)

 

(10.6)

State

 

(12.0)

 

(4.0)

 

(1.9)

Total deferred

 

(59.0)

 

(15.5)

 

(12.5)

Total income tax expense

$

22.4

$

35.7

$

41.6

A reconciliation of our federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows:

    

Year ended December 31, 

 

    

2022

    

2021

    

2020

    

Federal statutory rate

21.0

%  

21.0

%  

21.0

%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

5.2

 

3.7

 

4.2

Non-deductible executive compensation

3.0

 

1.2

 

1.2

Effect of Optimal Blue acquisition and related transactions (1)

(7.9)

1.4

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

0.4

 

1.4

 

1.3

Tax credits

(9.4)

 

(6.2)

 

(4.6)

Restricted share vesting

(0.3)

 

(2.7)

 

(2.6)

Prior year return to provision adjustments

(2.8)

(5.0)

Unrecognized tax benefit

1.9

Other

1.5

 

1.2

 

0.1

Effective tax rate

13.5

%  

16.8

%  

18.9

%

(1)Includes the effect of a first quarter 2022 discrete income tax benefit of $14.1 million related to the establishment of a deferred tax asset as a result of our reorganization of certain wholly owned subsidiaries within the Optimal Blue partnership investment structure during the year ended December 31, 2022.

92

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following (in millions):

December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Deferred tax assets:

 

  

 

  

Equity method investments

$

0.9

$

2.6

Equity-based compensation

 

17.5

 

4.6

Deferred revenues

 

11.0

 

20.5

Interest rate swaps

 

 

3.8

Other

 

12.0

 

25.3

Total deferred tax assets

 

41.4

 

56.8

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Goodwill and other intangible assets

 

(134.8)

 

(183.4)

Deferred contract costs

 

(43.1)

 

(44.1)

Property, equipment and software

 

(24.9)

 

(30.2)

Partnership basis

 

(58.6)

 

(80.1)

Interest rate swaps

(0.6)

Other

 

(6.9)

 

(3.1)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(268.9)

 

(340.9)

Net deferred tax liability

$

(227.5)

$

(284.1)

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that any portion of deferred tax assets will be utilized. In making this assessment, management considers the projected future earnings, tax planning strategies, and reversal of deferred tax liabilities that will give rise to future taxable income. Based on this assessment, and the overall deferred tax liability position, management concluded that only an immaterial deferred tax asset related to certain state credits is subject to a valuation allowance. All other deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be utilized in future years, and therefore are not subject to valuation allowance.

Through acquisition, we have immaterial state net operating losses subject to various limitations and carryforward periods. The average carryforward period is approximately 20 years, with certain states having an indefinite carryforward period.

A reserve for uncertain tax positions is recorded as a result of certain items claimed in current and prior periods. We expect $2.3 million of the reserve to reverse in the following year due to the lapse in statute of limitations. If we were to prevail on our uncertain tax positions, the reversal of this reserve would also be a benefit to our effective tax rate. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

December 31, 

    

2022

    

2021

Balance, January 1

$

9.7

    

$

4.1

Additions based on tax positions of prior years

 

 

3.3

Additions based on tax positions of current year

 

2.9

 

2.3

Decreases based on tax positions of prior years

 

(1.7)

 

Balance, December 31

$

10.9

$

9.7

Our open tax years are 2019, 2020 and 2021 for federal income tax purposes. We have open tax years for state income tax purposes for up to six years based on each state’s laws.

(19)Segment Information

ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting ("ASC 280"), establishes standards for reporting information about segments and requires that a public business enterprise reports financial and descriptive information about its segments. Segments are

93

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM") in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief executive officer is identified as the CODM as defined by ASC 280. To align with the internal management of our business operations based on service offerings, our business is organized into two segments. Refer to Note 15 — Revenues for a description of our Software Solutions and Data and Analytics segments.

Separate discrete financial information is available for these two segments and the operating results of each segment are regularly evaluated by the CODM in order to assess performance and allocate resources. We use EBITDA as the primary profitability measure for making decisions regarding ongoing operations. EBITDA is earnings before Interest expense, net, Other (expense) income, net, Income tax expense and Depreciation and amortization. It also excludes Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. We do not allocate Interest expense, net, Other (expense) income, net, Income tax expense, equity-based compensation and certain other items, such as purchase accounting adjustments and acquisition-related costs to the segments, since these items are not considered in evaluating the segments’ overall operating performance.

Segment asset information is not included below because we do not use it to evaluate performance or allocate resources. Summarized financial information concerning our segments is shown in the tables below (in millions):

Year ended December 31, 2022

Software 

    

Data and 

Corporate and 

    

Solutions

Analytics

    

Other

    

Total

Revenues

$

1,333.9

  

$

218.0

$

$

1,551.9

Expenses:

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

Operating expenses

 

597.4

  

 

148.7

 

126.2

(2)

 

872.3

Transition and integration costs

 

  

 

 

31.8

(3)

 

31.8

EBITDA

 

736.5

 

69.3

 

(158.0)

 

647.8

Depreciation and amortization

 

146.6

  

 

15.8

 

207.2

(4)

 

369.6

Operating income (loss)

 

589.9

 

53.5

 

(365.2)

  

 

278.2

Interest expense, net

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

(100.6)

Other expense, net

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

(11.9)

Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

165.7

Income tax expense

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

22.4

Earnings before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

143.3

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

306.7

Net earnings

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

450.0

Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

2.5

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

$

452.5

Item 15.

94

Table of Contents

BLACK KNIGHT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Year ended December 31, 2021

Software 

Data and 

Corporate and 

    

    

Solutions

    

Analytics

    

Other

    

Total

Revenues

$

1,250.0

$

225.2

$

$

1,475.2

Expenses:

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

Operating expenses

 

536.3

 

145.0

 

112.6

(2)

 

793.9

Transition and integration costs

 

 

 

13.3

(3)

 

13.3

EBITDA

 

713.7

 

80.2

 

(125.9)

  

 

668.0

Depreciation and amortization

 

131.1

 

15.5

 

218.4

(4)

 

365.0

Operating income (loss)

 

582.6

 

64.7

 

(344.3)

  

 

303.0

Interest expense, net

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

(83.6)

Other expense, net

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

(6.4)

Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

213.0

Income tax expense

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

35.7

Earnings before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

177.3

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

2.6

Net earnings

179.9

Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

28.0

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

$

207.9

Year ended December 31, 2020

Software 

Data and 

Corporate and 

    

    

Solutions

    

Analytics

    

Other

    

Total

Revenues

$

1,040.2

$

198.7

$

(0.4)

(1)

$

1,238.5

Expenses:

 

  

 

  

Operating expenses

 

435.6

133.9

100.1

(2)

 

669.6

Transition and integration costs

 

31.4

(3)

 

31.4

EBITDA

 

604.6

 

64.8

 

(131.9)

  

 

537.5

Depreciation and amortization

 

120.9

15.1

134.7

(4)

 

270.7

Operating income (loss)

 

483.7

 

49.7

 

(266.6)

  

 

266.8

Interest expense, net

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

(62.9)

Other income, net

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

16.4

Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

220.3

Income tax expense

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

41.6

Earnings before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

178.7

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

67.1

Net earnings

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

245.8

Net losses attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

18.3

Net earnings attributable to Black Knight

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

$

264.1

(1)Revenues for Corporate and Other represents deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustments recorded in accordance with GAAP.
(2)Operating expenses for Corporate and Other includes equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes, of $55.7 million, $42.9 million and $40.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(3)Transition and integration costs primarily consists of costs related to the ICE Transaction and costs associated with acquisitions.
(4)Depreciation and amortization for Corporate and Other primarily represents net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting recorded in accordance with GAAP.EXHIBITS

95

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the year covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and proceduresAll other schedules are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has adopted the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Based on our evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

96

Item 9B.Other Information

None.

Item 9C.Disclosures Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

None.

Part III

Items 10-14.

Within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year, we intend to file with the SEC a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which will include the matters required by these items.

97

PART IV

Item 15.           Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements. The following is a list of the consolidated financial statements of Black Knight, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in Part II Item 8:

Page
Number

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP, Jacksonville, FL, Auditor Firm ID: 185)

52

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021

55

Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020

56

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020

57

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020

59

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

60

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is presentedincluded in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

(a)(3) Exhibits. Exhibits required(1) The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are set forth on pages to be filed by Item 601of Regulation S-K, and by Item 15(b) are included below:

this Form 10-K:

98

Exhibit
Number

HIDDEN_ROW

Description

Exhibit
Number

Description

2.1

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 8, 2017, by and among New BKH Corp., Black Knight Financial Services, Inc., Black Knight Holdco Corp., New BKH Merger Sub, Inc., BKFS Merger Sub, Inc. and Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on June 9, 2017 (No. 001-37394))

2.2*

Equity Purchase Agreement, dated July 26, 2020, by and among Black Knight, Inc., GTCR Fund XI/C LP, GTCR/OB Blocker Corp., GTCR/OB Splitter LP, OB Holdings I, LLC, OB Acquisition, LLC, and OB Holdings I, LLC, in its capacity as the Seller Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on July 28, 2020 (No. 001-37394))

2.3

Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2022, by and among Black Knight, Optimal Blue I, Cannae, THL, Optimal Blue Holdco and Black Knight Technologies (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 15, 2022 (No. 001-37394))

2.4*

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 4, 2022, among Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., Sand Merger Sub Corporation and Black Knight, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 5, 2022 (No. 001-37394)

3.1

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Black Knight, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on June 13, 2019 (No. 000-37394))

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Black Knight, Inc. as adopted on February 8, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 14, 2023 (No. 001-37494))

4.1

Description of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 28, 2020 (No. 001-37394))

4.2

Indenture among Black Knight InfoServ, LLC, the Guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated August 26, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 26, 2020 (No. 001-37394))

4.3

Form of 3.625% Senior Note due 2028 of Black Knight InfoServ, LLC.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 26, 2020 (No. 001-37394), which is included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 26, 2020 (No. 001-37394))

10.1

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Kirk T. Larsen and BKFS I Management, Inc. dated April 23, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 4 to the Form S-1 Registration Statement filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on May 4, 2015 (No. 333-201241)) (1)

54

Exhibit
Number
Description

10.2

Employment Agreement by and between BKFS I Management, Inc. and Michael L. Gravelle, effective as of March 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 3 to the Form S-1 Registration Statement filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on April 20, 2015 (No. 333-201241)) (1)

10.3

Black Knight, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective September 15, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 23, 2018 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.4

Cross-Indemnity Agreement by and between Black Knight Financial Services, LLC and ServiceLink Holdings, LLC dated as of December 22, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 2 to the Form S-1 Registration Statement filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on March 30, 2015 (No. 333-201241))

99

10.5

10.5First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Kirk T. Larsen and BKFS I Management, Inc. dated March 17, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on April 29, 2016 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.6

Second Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between BKFS I Management, Inc. and Kirk Larsen effective April 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on August 9, 2016 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.7

First Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between BKFS I Management, Inc. and Michael L. Gravelle effective April 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on August 9, 2016 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.8

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Joseph M. Nackashi and BKFS I Management, Inc. effective July 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc. on July 28, 2017 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.9

Employment Agreement by and between BKFS I Services, LLC and Anthony M. Jabbour, effective as of April 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 23, 2018 (No. 001-36394)) (1)

10.10

Second Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between BKFS I Services, LLC and Michael L. Gravelle effective as of November 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on November 7, 2019 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.11

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (2019) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 22, 2019 (No. 001-373394)) (1)

10.12

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Directors) (2020) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 5, 2020 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.13

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Award Amendment (2020) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 5, 2020 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.14

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Award Amendment (2021) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 6, 2021 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

55

10.15

10.15

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Directors) (2021) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 5, 2021 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.16

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Unit and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Directors) (2021) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 5, 2021 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.17

Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on October 2, 2017 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

100

10.18

Black Knight, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, amended and restated effective as of December 5, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 28, 2020 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.19

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 23, 2020, among Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. and Black Knight InfoServ, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on June 29, 2020 (No. 001-37394))

10.20

Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2021, by and among Black Knight InfoServ, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as the borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on March 12, 2021 (No. 001-37394))

10.21

Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC 2020 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 26, 2021 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.22

Optimal Blue Holdco, LLC Unit Grant Agreement (2020) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Form 10-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on February 26, 2021 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.23

First Amendment to Employment Agreement of Anthony M. Jabbour dated May 16, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 18, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.24

First Amendment to Employment Agreement of Joseph M. Nackashi dated May 16, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 18, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.25

Third Amendment to Employment Agreement of Kirk T. Larsen dated May 16, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 18, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.26

Third Amendment to Employment Agreement of Michael L. Gravelle dated May 16, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 18, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.27

Letter Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2022, by and between Anthony M. Jabbour and Black Knight, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Black Knight, Inc. on December 23, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.28

10.28Form of Notice of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (2022) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on May 9, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

56

10.29

10.29

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (May 2022) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 4, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.30

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Directors) (2022) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 4, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

10.31

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Unit and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Directors) (2022) under Black Knight, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q filed by Black Knight, Inc. on August 4, 2022 (No. 001-37394)) (1)

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant (2)

23.1

Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (2)

101

31.1

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)

32.1

31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2022

31.4Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2022
32.1Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (2)

32.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (2)

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101

(1)A management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.

*

(2)

Schedules omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedulePreviously filed, or furnished, as applicable, as an exhibit to the SEC upon request; provided, however, that we may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 ofCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any schedules or exhibits so furnished.fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

*             Schedules omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish     supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request; provided,     however, that we may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any schedules or exhibits so furnished.

**

The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags     are embedded within the inline XBRL documentdocument..

Item 16.           Form 10-K Summary

None.

57

102

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Black Knight, Inc.

By:

/s/ Joseph M Nackashi

Joseph M. Nackashi

Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 28, 2023

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Black Knight,Inc.

Signature

Title

Date

By:

/s/ Joseph M. Nackashi

Joseph M. Nackashi

Chief Executive Officer

February 28, 2023

Joseph M. Nackashi

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 24, 2023

/s/ Kirk T. Larsen

President and Chief Financial Officer

February 28, 2023

Kirk T. Larsen

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ Anthony M. Jabbour

Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 28, 2023

Anthony M. Jabbour

/s/ Catherine L. Burke

Director

February 28, 2023

Catherine L. Burke

/s/ Thomas M. Hagerty

Director

February 28, 2023

Thomas M. Hagerty

/s/ David K. Hunt

Director

February 28, 2023

David K. Hunt

/s/ Joseph M. Otting

Director

February 28, 2023

Joseph M. Otting

/s/ Ganesh B. Rao

Director

February 28, 2023

Ganesh B. Rao

/s/ John D. Rood

Director

February 28, 2023

John D. Rood

/s/ Nancy L. Shanik

Director

February 28, 2023

Nancy L. Shanik

58

103