United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016

or

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                     

Commission file number: 0-10653

 

UNITED STATIONERSESSENDANT INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

Delaware

 

36-3141189

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

One Parkway North Boulevard

Suite 100

Deerfield, Illinois 60015-2559

(847) 627-7000

(Address, Including Zip Code and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share

Name of Exchange on which registered:
NASDAQ Global Select Market

(Title of Class)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes   x    No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ¨    No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   x    No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 and Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes   x    No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See the definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

x

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes  ¨     No   x

The aggregate market value of the common stock of United Stationers Inc. held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2014 was approximately $1.468 billion.

On February 13, 2015, United Stationers Inc. had 38,563,203 shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Certain portions of United Stationers Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after the end of United Stationers Inc.’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III.


UNITED STATIONERS INC.

FORM 10-K

For The Year Ended December 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

Part I

Item 1.

Business

1

Executive Officers of the Registrant

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

6

Item 1B.

Unresolved Comment Letters

9

Item 2.

Properties

9

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

9

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosure

9

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

10

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

13

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

14

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

25

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

29

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

63

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

63

Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

64

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

64

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

64

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

64

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

64

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

65

Signatures

69

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

70


PART I

ITEM  1.

BUSINESS.

General

United Stationers Inc. is a leading national wholesale distributor of workplace essentials, with consolidated net sales of $5.3 billion. United stocks a broad assortment of over 160,000 products, including technology products, traditional office products, office furniture, janitorial and breakroom supplies, industrial supplies, and automotive aftermarket tools and equipment. The Company’s network of 77 distribution centers allows it to ship products to approximately 30,000 reseller customers, enabling the Company to ship most products overnight to more than 90% of the U.S. and next day delivery to major cities in Mexico and Canada. The Company also has operations in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Company also operates as an online retailer which sells direct to end consumers.

Our strategy is comprised of three key elements:

1) Strengthen our core office, janitorial, and breakroom business with a common operating and IT platform, an aligned customer care and sales team, and advanced digital services,

2) Win online by growing our business-to-business (B2B) sales with major e-commerce players and enabling the online success of our resellers by providing digital capabilities and tools to support them, and

3) Expand and diversify our business into higher growth and higher margin channels and categories.  

Execution on these priorities will allow us to become the fastest and most convenient solution for workplace essentials.

Except where otherwise noted, the terms “United” and “the Company” refer to United Stationers Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The parent holding company, United Stationers Inc. (USI), was incorporated in 1981 in Delaware. USI’s only direct wholly owned subsidiary—and its principal operating company—is United Stationers Supply Co. (USSC), incorporated in 1922 in Illinois.

Products

United stocks over 160,000 products in these categories:

Janitorial and Breakroom Supplies. United is a leading wholesaler of janitorial and breakroom supplies throughout the nation. The Company holds over 25,000 items in these lines: janitorial supplies (cleaners and cleaning accessories), breakroom items (food and beverage products), foodservice consumables (such as disposable cups, plates and utensils), safety and security items, and paper and packaging supplies. This product category provided about 27.2% of 2014’s net sales primarily from Lagasse, LLC (Lagasse), a wholly owned subsidiary of USSC.

Technology Products. The Company is a leading national wholesale distributor of computer supplies and peripherals. It stocks over 10,000 items, including imaging supplies, data storage, digital cameras, computer accessories and computer hardware items such as printers and other peripherals. United provides these products to value-added computer resellers, office products dealers, drug stores, grocery chains and e-commerce merchants. Technology products generated about 27.0% of the Company’s 2014 consolidated net sales.

Traditional Office Products. The Company is one of the largest national wholesale distributors of a broad range of office supplies. It carries approximately 23,000 brand-name and private label products, such as filing and record storage products, business machines, presentation products, writing instruments, paper products, shipping and mailing supplies, calendars and general office accessories. These products contributed approximately 25.0% of net sales during 2014.

Industrial Supplies. United is a leading wholesaler of industrial supplies in the United States and stocks over 100,000 items including hand and power tools, safety and security supplies, janitorial equipment and supplies, other various industrial MRO (maintenance, repair and operations) items and oil field and welding supplies. With the October 31st, 2014 acquisition of Liberty Bell Equipment Corp., a United States wholesaler of automotive aftermarket tools and supplies, and its affiliates (collectively, MEDCO) including G2S Equipment de Fabrication et d’Entretien ULC, a Canadian wholesaler, United now stocks automotive aftermarket tools and equipment. In 2014, the industrial category accounted for approximately 12.0% of the Company’s net sales.

Office Furniture. United is one of the largest office furniture wholesaler distributors in the nation. It stocks approximately 4,000 products including desks, filing and storage solutions, seating and systems furniture, along with a variety of products for niche markets such as education, government, healthcare and professional services. This product category represented approximately 5.8% of net sales for the year.


The remainder of the Company’s consolidated net sales came from freight, advertising and software related revenue.

United offers private brand products within each of its product categories to help resellers provide quality value-priced items to their customers. These include Innovera® technology products, Universal® office products, Windsoft® paper products, Boardwalk® and UniSan® janitorial and sanitation products, Alera® office furniture, and Anchor Brand® and Best Welds® welding, industrial, safety and oil field pipeline products.

During 2014, private brand products accounted for approximately 16.0% of United’s net sales.

Customers

United serves a diverse group of approximately 30,000 reseller customers. They include independent office products dealers; contract stationers; office products superstores; computer products resellers; office furniture dealers; mass merchandisers; mail order companies; sanitary supply, paper and foodservice distributors; drug and grocery store chains; healthcare distributors; e-commerce merchants; oil field, welding supply and industrial/MRO distributors; automotive aftermarket dealers and wholesalers; and other independent distributors.  One customer, W.B. Mason Co., Inc., accounted for approximately 12% of its 2014 consolidated net sales. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of 2014 consolidated net sales.

Sales to independent resellers contributed 88% of consolidated net sales. The Company provides its reseller customers with value-added services designed to help them market their products and services while improving operating efficiencies and reducing costs. National accounts comprised 12% of the Company’s 2014 consolidated net sales.

Many of our resellers have online capabilities. The Company also operates as an online retailer which sells direct to end consumers.

Marketing and Customer Support

United’s marketing and customer care capabilities provide value-added services to resellers. The Company provides comprehensive printed catalogs for easy shopping and reference guides to more promotional materials. Extensive digital content and capabilities are provided to better position resellers on the internet. This ranges from a content database digitized for e-commerce to advanced eBusiness capabilities, website development, analytics and digital promotional campaigns. An important component of the value proposition is that the Company produces the printed and digital items on behalf of resellers and collects fees and/or advertising revenue from resellers in return.

United also provides specific services that enable resellers to improve their business model. These services include primary research efforts, brand strategy and development, campaign development, customer segmentation and cost management, and training programs designed to help resellers improve their sales and marketing techniques.

Distribution

United’s distribution network enables the Company to ship most products on an overnight basis to more than 90% of the U.S. and next day delivery to major cities in Mexico and Canada, with an average line fill rate of approximately 97%. United’s domestic operations generated approximately $5.1 billion of its approximate $5.3 billion in 2014 consolidated net sales, with its international operations contributing another $0.2 billion to 2014 net sales. Efficient order processing resulted in a 99.7% order accuracy rate for the year.

The Company’s network of 77 distribution centers are spread across the nation to facilitate delivery. United has a dedicated fleet of approximately 475 trucks. This enables United to make direct deliveries to resellers from regional distribution centers and local distribution points.

The “Wrap and Label” program is another important service for resellers. It gives resellers the option to receive individually packaged orders ready to be delivered to their end consumers. For example, when a reseller places orders for several individual consumers, United can pick and pack the items separately, placing a label on each package with the consumer’s name, ready for delivery to the end consumer by the reseller. Resellers benefit from the “Wrap and Label” program because it eliminates the need to break down bulk shipments and repackage orders before delivering them to consumers.

In addition to providing value-adding programs for resellers, United also remains committed to reducing its operating costs. These activities include process improvement and work simplification activities that help increase efficiency throughout the business and improve customer satisfaction.


Purchasing and Merchandising

As a leading wholesale distributor of workplace essentials, United leverages its broad product selection as a key merchandising strategy. The Company orders products from approximately 1,600 manufacturers. Based on United’s purchasing volume it receives substantial supplier allowances and can realize significant economies of scale in its logistics and distribution activities. In 2014, the Company’s largest supplier was Hewlett-Packard Company, which represented approximately 16% of the Company’s total purchases.

The Company’s merchandising department is responsible for selecting merchandise and for managing the entire supplier relationship. Product selection is based on three factors: end-consumer acceptance; anticipated demand for the product; and the manufacturer’s total service, price and product quality.

Competition

The markets in which the Company competes are highly competitive. The Company competes with other wholesale distributors and with the manufacturers of the products the Company sells. In addition, the Company competes with warehouse clubs and the business-to-business sales divisions of national business products resellers. United competes primarily on the basis of breadth of product lines, availability of products, speed of delivery, order fill rates, net pricing to customers, and the quality of marketing and other value-added services.

Seasonality

United’s sales generally are relatively steady throughout the year. However, sales also reflect seasonal buying patterns for consumers of traditional office products. In particular, the Company’s sales of traditional office products usually are higher than average during January, when many businesses begin operating under new annual budgets and release previously deferred purchase orders. Janitorial and breakroom supplies and industrial supplies sales are somewhat higher in the summer months.

Employees

As of February 13, 2015, United employed approximately 6,500 people.

Management believes it has good relations with its associates. Approximately 539 of the shipping, warehouse and maintenance associates at certain of the Company’s Baltimore, Los Angeles and New Jersey distribution centers are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The bargaining agreements in the Los Angeles and New Jersey distribution centers were renegotiated in 2014. The bargaining agreement in Baltimore is scheduled to be renegotiated in August 2015. Additionally, the Company’s warehouse employees in Mexico are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.


Executive Officers Of The Registrant

The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

Name, Age and
Position with the Company

Business Experience

P. Cody Phipps
  53, President and Chief Executive Officer

P. Cody Phipps was promoted to Chief Executive Officer in May 2011. Prior to that time he served as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer from September 2010 and as the Company’s President, United Stationers Supply from October 2006 to September 2010. He joined the Company in August 2003 as its Senior Vice President, Operations. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Phipps was a partner at McKinsey & Company, Inc., a global management consulting firm where he led the firm’s North American Operations Effectiveness Practice and co-founded and led its Service Strategy and Operations Initiative. Prior to joining McKinsey, Mr. Phipps worked as a consultant with The Information Consulting Group, a systems consulting firm, and as an IBM account marketing representative.

Todd A. Shelton
  48, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Todd A. Shelton was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in August 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Shelton served as President, United Stationers Supply from September 2010 and President of Lagasse, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Stationers Supply Co. Mr. Shelton previously held the position of Chief Operating Officer of Lagasse after joining in 2001 as Vice President, Finance and has held various leadership roles in sales, customer service, operations, and procurement. Before joining Lagasse, Mr. Shelton was a Partner and Vice President at a privately-held manufacturer of retail and medical products. He began his career at Baxter Healthcare with roles in finance, IT, sales and marketing.

Eric A. Blanchard
  58, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Eric A. Blanchard has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January 2006. From November 2002 until December 2005, he served as the Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Tennant Company. Previously Mr. Blanchard was with Dean Foods Company where he held the positions of Chief Operating Officer, Dairy Division from January 2002 to October 2002, Vice President and President, Dairy Division from 1999 to 2002 and General Counsel and Secretary from 1988 to 1999.

Timothy P. Connolly
  51, President, Business Transformation and Supply Chain

Timothy P. Connolly was named as the Company’s President, Business Transformation and Supply Chain in October 2013. Prior to this position he served as President, Operations and Logistics Services from January 2011 to October 2013. He also previously served as Senior Vice President, Operations from December 2006 until January 2011. From February 2006 to December 2006, Mr. Connolly was Vice President, Field Operations Support and Facility Engineering. He joined the Company in August 2003 as Region Vice President Operations, Midwest. Before joining the Company, Mr. Connolly was the Regional Vice President, Midwest Region for Cardinal Health where he directed operations, sales, human resources, finance, and customer service for one of Cardinal’s largest pharmaceutical distribution centers.

Carole Tomko
  60, Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

Carole W. Tomko has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since May 2014. Previously Ms. Tomko was a partner in The Woodmansee Group, an executive search consultancy and human resources consulting firm.  Prior to launching her consulting practice, Ms. Tomko held a variety of critical Human Resource leadership positions with Federated Department Stores, The Standard Register Company, The Chemlawn Corporation and Cardinal Health where she led the human resources function.


Name, Age and
Position with the Company

Business Experience

Paul Barrett

  56, Chief Operating Officer, Industrial

Paul Barrett was appointed Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the Company’s Industrial business (including ORS and MEDCO) in August 2014.  Mr. Barrett joined USI’s Lagasse business in April of 2007 as Vice President, Sales & Customer Service.  In October 2010, he was promoted to President of Lagasse.  Prior to joining Lagasse, Mr. Barrett served from May 2003 to March 2007 as Senior Vice President & General Manager of Socrates Media, a venture capital owned multi-media print and internet business. Prior to joining Socrates Media, Mr. Barrett was Group Vice President Marketing and Strategy for APAC Customer Services. Prior to joining APAC, Mr. Barrett spent over seventeen years in positions of increasing responsibility in Sales, Marketing and General management with ACCO World Corporation, the Office Products division of Fortune Brands.

Joseph G. Hartsig

  51, Senior Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer

Joseph G. Hartsig joined the Company in November 2013 as Senior Vice President, Merchandising. Prior to joining United Stationers, he was General Merchandising Manager at Sam’s Club, the wholesale club division of Wal-mart, Inc. Prior to joining Sam’s Club, Mr. Hartsig was a Vice President at Motorola, where he spent eight years in consumer technology product management and sales capacities in Illinois and overseas. Previous to Motorola, Mr. Hartsig held various management and marketing positions with  Conagra Foods, Inc., Pillsbury, and S.C. Johnson.

Richard D. Phillips,

  44, President, Online and New Channels

Richard D. Phillips joined the Company in January 2013 as President, Online and New Channels. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Phillips spent 14 years at McKinsey & Company, where he was elected Partner in 2005. Prior to joining McKinsey, he spent six years at Baxter Healthcare in finance and sales.

Executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors. Except as required by individual employment agreements between executive officers and the Company, there exists no arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which such executive officer was elected. Each executive officer serves until his or her successor is appointed and qualified or until his or her earlier removal or resignation.

Availability of the Company’s Reports

The Company’s principal Web site address is www.unitedstationers.com. This site provides United’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments and exhibits to those reports filed or furnished under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) for free as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, copies of these filings (excluding exhibits) may be requested at no cost by contacting the Investor Relations Department:

United Stationers Inc.

Attn: Investor Relations Department

One Parkway North Boulevard

Suite 100

Deerfield, Illinois 60015-2559

(847) 627-7000

(Address, Including Zip Code and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share

Name of Exchange on which registered:
NASDAQ Global Select Market

(Title of Class)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 and Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes       No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See the definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes        No  

The aggregate market value of the common stock of Essendant Inc. held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $0.68 billion.

On February 21, 2017, Essendant Inc. had 37,472,971 shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Certain portions of Essendant Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after the end of Essendant Inc.’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III.


ESSENDANT INC.

FORM 10-K

For The Year Ended December 31, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

Part I

Item 1.

Business

1

Executive Officers of the Registrant

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

7

Item 1B.

Unresolved Comment Letters

7

Item 2.

Properties

11

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

11

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosure

11

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

12

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

14

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

15

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

27

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

28

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

66

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

66

Item 9B.

Other Information

66

Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

68

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

68

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

68

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

68

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

68

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

69

Signatures

73

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

74


PART I

ITEM  1.

BUSINESS.

General

Essendant Inc. (formerly known as United Stationers, Inc.) is a leading national wholesale distributor of workplace items including janitorial, foodservice and breakroom supplies (JanSan), technology products, traditional office products, industrial supplies, cut sheet paper products, automotive products and office furniture. Except where otherwise noted, the terms “Essendant” and “the Company” refer to Essendant Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The parent holding company, Essendant Inc. (ESND), was incorporated in 1981 in Delaware. ESND’s only direct wholly owned subsidiary and principal operating company is Essendant Co. (ECO) incorporated in 1922 in Illinois. Essendant has one reportable segment and operates principally within the United States, with additional operations in Canada and Dubai, United Arab Emirates (“UAE”).

Essendant’s goal is to power our partners to reach the modern workplace through smarter operations, business growth and category expansion. To achieve this goal, Essendant leverages its product portfolio, fulfillment network and industry specific sales, marketing, digital and strategic services.

The Company has begun implementing six actions to improve the value of our business, which include:

Merchandising excellence through supplier negotiation to reduce cost of goods sold, driving Essendant brand strategies and assortment optimization to increase profitability.

Alignment of pricing with cost to serve through the standardization of contracts and reevaluation of pricing.

Stabilization of the JanSan sales channel by improving the customer experience and comprehensive sales, marketing and care programs to regain lost sales.

Industrial growth through continued diversification and leveraging of the product set to a broader customer base and focus on online and governmental growth initiatives.

Additional cost reductions through network optimization, productivity improvements and in-bound freight management activities.

Reduce working capital through reductions in inventory and continued debt reductions through free cash flow generation.

Broad and Diverse Product Portfolio

Essendant sells over 190,000 products and is a leading national wholesale distributor in the following product categories:

Janitorial, Foodservice and Breakroom Supplies (“JanSan”). The Company provides access to over 22,000 items in these lines: janitorial supplies (cleaners and cleaning accessories), breakroom items (food and beverage products), foodservice consumables (such as disposable cups, plates and utensils), safety and security items, and paper and packaging supplies. This product category provided 26.7% of net sales in 2016.

Technology Products. The Company provides access to approximately 11,000 items, including imaging supplies, data storage, digital cameras, computer accessories and computer hardware items such as printers and other peripherals. Essendant provides these products to value-added computer resellers, office products dealers, drug stores, grocery chains and online merchants. The technology product category generated 25.1% of the Company’s 2016 consolidated net sales.

Traditional Office Products. The Company provides access to a broad range of office supplies. It carries over 20,000 brand-name and Essendant brand products, such as filing and record storage products, business machines, presentation products, writing instruments, shipping and mailing supplies, calendars and general office accessories. This product category contributed 16.0% of net sales during 2016.

Industrial Supplies. Essendant provides access to over 130,000 items including hand and power tools, safety and security supplies, janitorial equipment and supplies, other various industrial MRO (maintenance, repair and operations) items, oil field and welding supplies. In 2016, the industrial product category accounted for 10.4% of the Company’s net sales.

Cut Sheet Paper Products. Essendant provides access to a broad range of cut sheet paper products including brand-name and Essendant brand copy paper with a wide assortment of styles and types. In 2016, the cut sheet paper product category accounted for 7.4% of the Company’s net sales.

Automotive Products. The Company has a broad portfolio of automotive aftermarket tools and equipment. In 2016, this product category accounted for 5.9% of the Company’s net sales.

Office Furniture. Essendant provides access to approximately 4,000 products including desks, filing and storage solutions, seating and systems furniture, along with a variety of products for niche markets such as education, government, healthcare and professional services. This product category represented 5.6% of net sales for the year.

1


The remainder of the Company’s consolidated net sales came from freight, services, advertising and other revenues.

Essendant brand products within each of the Company’s product categories help resellers provide quality value-priced items to their customers. These include Universal® office products, Boardwalk® janitorial, foodservice and breakroom products, Alera® office furniture, Innovera® technology products, Windsoft® paper products, and Anchor Brand® and Best Welds® welding, industrial, safety and oil field pipeline products. Essendant also offers the following automotive brand products: Advanced Tool Design (ATD), Finish Pro, Painters Pride, Quipall, Nesco, Performance One, and AIM.

During 2016, Essendant brand products accounted for approximately 15.5% of Essendant’s net sales.

Extensive Fulfillment Network

Essendant’s fulfillment and distribution network enables the Company to ship most products on an overnight basis to more than 90% of the U.S. with an average line fill rate of approximately 97%. Essendant’s domestic operations generated approximately $5.3 billion of its $5.4 billion in 2016 consolidated net sales, with its international operations contributing an additional $0.1 billion to 2016 net sales.

The Company’s network of 70 distribution centers is spread across the nation to facilitate delivery. Essendant has a dedicated fleet of approximately 480 trucks. This enables Essendant to make direct deliveries to resellers from regional distribution centers and local distribution points.

In addition to providing a broad product selection that allows resellers to offer products to their customers that they do not physically stock, the company also offers the “Wrap and Label” program. “Wrap and Label” gives resellers the option to receive individually packaged orders ready to be delivered to their end consumers. For example, when a reseller places orders for several individual consumers, Essendant can pick and pack the items separately, placing a label on each package with the consumer’s name, ready for delivery to the end consumer by the reseller. Resellers benefit from the “Wrap and Label” program because it eliminates the need to break down bulk shipments and repackage orders before delivering them to consumers.

Sales, Marketing, Digital and Strategic Services

Essendant’s sales, marketing, digital and strategic services, including customer care capabilities, are key to its position as a value-add distributor. Essendant provides its resellers a variety of digital tools to enhance their ability to compete online. These tools include digitized product content, website development, digital analytics, and marketing and merchandising tools to drive the performance of resellers’ websites. An important component of the value proposition is that the Company produces integrated print and digital tools in return for a deeper commercial relationship with its resellers.

Essendant also provides specific services that enable resellers to improve their operating and strategic business models. These services include primary research efforts, brand strategy and development, campaign development, customer segmentation and cost management, and training programs designed to help resellers improve their sales and marketing techniques.

Customers

Essendant serves a diverse group of approximately 29,000 reseller customers. They include office and workplace dealers; facilities and maintenance distributors; technology, military, automotive aftermarket, national big-box retailers and healthcare and vertical suppliers; industrial distributors and internet retailers.

To help its customers, Essendant leverages its common operations and IT platform for JanSan, traditional office products, cut sheet paper products and office furniture. The Company offers an extensive national fulfillment and logistics network, enhanced digital solutions, integrated marketing tools, broad product portfolio, and the Company’s long-standing industry expertise and dedicated support team with intimate knowledge of what customers need. The Company also operates CPO Commerce which sells tools, do-it-yourself equipment and other items online to the consumer market.

During 2016 the Company’s net sales were to independent resellers (76% of consolidated net sales), national big-box retailers (9%) and internet retailers (15%). One customer, W.B. Mason Co., Inc., accounted for approximately 11% of its 2016 consolidated net sales. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of 2016 consolidated net sales.

2


Purchasing and Merchandising Strategy

As a leading wholesale distributor of workplace items, Essendant leverages its broad product selection as a key merchandising strategy. Based on Essendant’s purchasing volume it receives substantial supplier allowances and can realize significant economies of scale in its logistics and distribution activities. In 2016, the Company’s largest supplier was Hewlett-Packard Company, which represented approximately 20% of the Company’s total purchases.

The Company’s merchandising department is responsible for selecting merchandise and for managing the entire supplier relationship throughout each of the product categories. Product selection is based on three factors: end-consumer acceptance; anticipated demand for the product; and the manufacturer’s total service, price and product quality.

Competition

The markets in which the Company participates are highly competitive. Historically, the Company competed with other wholesale distributors, manufacturers of the products the Company sells, warehouse clubs and the business-to-business sales divisions of national business products resellers, but as the competitive landscape continues to evolve, the Company has experienced increased competition from internet retailers selling to the Company’s resellers, especially in the JanSan, technology and office product categories. Essendant competes primarily on the basis of diversity and breadth of category and product lines, reliability, variety and availability of products, nationwide next day delivery, product affordability, and the quality of industry specific sales support, marketing, digital and strategic services.

Employees

As of January 31, 2017, Essendant employed approximately 6,600 associates.

Approximately 660 of the shipping, warehouse and maintenance associates at certain of the Company’s Baltimore, Los Angeles and New Jersey distribution centers are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The bargaining agreements in the Los Angeles and New Jersey distribution centers were renegotiated in 2014. The bargaining agreement in Baltimore was renegotiated in August 2015.

3


Executive Officers Of The Registrant

The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

Name, Age and Position with the Company

Business Experience

Robert B. Aiken
  54, President, Chief Executive Officer

Robert B. Aiken, Jr. was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors in February 2015 and was then named interim CEO in May 2015, followed by CEO in July 2015. He previously served on the Company’s Board of Directors from December 2010 to May 2014, at which time he stepped down from the Board due to the demands of his position as the Chief Executive Officer of Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger relief organization. Mr. Aiken was appointed CEO of Feeding America in November 2012. Prior to this role, Mr. Aiken was the CEO of the food company portfolio at Bolder Capital, a private equity firm. Mr. Aiken previously served as Managing Director of Capwell Partners LLC, a private-equity firm focused on companies offering health and wellness products and services. Mr. Aiken was the President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Foodservice from 2007 to 2010, one of the country’s premier foodservice distributors. Mr. Aiken joined U.S. Foodservice in 2004 and held several senior executive positions including President and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Strategy and Governance. From 2000 until 2004, Mr. Aiken served as President and Principal of Milwaukee Sign Co., a privately-held manufacturing firm. From 1994 to 2000, Mr. Aiken was an executive with Specialty Foods Corporation, where he held several positions, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Metz Baking Company. Early in Mr. Aiken’s career, he worked as a business lawyer. Mr. Aiken also serves as a director of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers.

Earl C. Shanks
  60, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Earl C. Shanks was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2015. Prior to joining Essendant, Mr. Shanks served as the Chief Financial Officer at Convergys Corporation from 2003 to 2012, a global leader in relationship management solutions and a major provider of outsourced business services. Prior to that, Mr. Shanks was the Chief Financial Officer between 2001 and 2003, and held various other financial leadership roles from 1996 to 2001 with NCR Corporation. Mr. Shanks also serves as a director of Verint, a global leader in actionable intelligence solutions.  

Eric A. Blanchard
  60, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Eric A. Blanchard has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since 2006. From 2002 until 2005, he served as the Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Tennant Company. Previously Mr. Blanchard was with Dean Foods Company where he held the positions of Chief Operating Officer, Dairy Division in 2002, Vice President and President, Dairy Division from 1999 to 2002 and General Counsel and Secretary from 1988 to 1999.  

Elizabeth H. Meloy

  39, Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate      Development

Elizabeth H. Meloy was named Senior Vice President of Strategy & Corporate Development in August 2016. She joined Essendant in 2013 and served as Vice President of Strategy & Corporate Development as well as Director of Corporate Development. Prior to joining Essendant, Ms. Meloy had a career in investment banking. She reached the role of Executive Director at UBS, where she was employed from 2005 to 2013.

Richard D. Phillips

  46, President, Industrial

Richard D. Phillips was named President, Industrial (formerly ORS Industrial) in 2015.  Prior to this position he served as President, Online and New Channels. Prior to joining the Company in 2013, Mr. Phillips spent 14 years at McKinsey & Company, where he was elected Partner in 2005. Prior to joining McKinsey, he spent six years at Baxter Healthcare in finance and sales.

4


Name, Age and Position with the Company

Business Experience

Harry A. Dochelli

  57, President, Office and Facilities

Harry A. Dochelli was named as the Company’s President, Office and Facilities (formerly Business & Facility Essentials) in August 2016. Previously, from 2013 to 2016, Mr. Dochelli served as Vice President IDC Sales and Senior Vice President Sales and Customer Care. Prior to joining Essendant, Mr. Dochelli held multiple roles over five years with Lawson Products, most recently serving as EVP and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Lawson Products, Mr. Dochelli spent more than 20 years in various management positions in sales and operations at Boise Cascade Corporation (now known as OfficeMax/Office Depot, Inc.), most recently serving as Executive Vice President of North America Contract Sales. Mr. Dochelli has recently been elected to the International Sanitary Supply Association Board (“ISSA”), as a Distributor Director for a three-year term commencing in October 2016.

Keith J. Dougherty

  46, Senior Vice President, Merchandising, Inventory and Pricing

Keith J. Dougherty joined Essendant in August 2016 as Senior Vice President, Merchandising, Inventory and Pricing. Before joining Essendant, Mr. Dougherty served in various roles during a 17 year tenure with U.S. Foods, most recently as Senior Vice President, Category Management, Indirect Spend and National Accounts. Prior to US Foods, Mr. Dougherty spent seven years with the investment banks Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers. 

Kirk Armstrong

  52, Senior Vice President, Distribution Operations and Logistics

Kirk Armstrong has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Distribution Operations and Logistics since 2011. From 2003 until 2011, he served as Vice President of Operations for the East Region. Prior to joining Essendant, Mr. Armstrong spent 13 years at W.W. Grainger, lastly serving as Regional Vice President, Distribution Operations.

Carole Tomko
  62, Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

Carole Tomko has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since 2014. Before joining Essendent, Ms. Tomko was a partner in an executive search and human resources consulting firm.  Prior to launching her consulting practice, Ms. Tomko held the role of Senior Vice President, Human Resources for Cardinal Health where she led the function for nine years. Additionally, Ms. Tomko has held Human Resources leadership positions for The Chemlawn Corporation, The Standard Register Company and Federated Department Stores. Ms. Tomko has also served in leadership positions on several non-profit boards over the last twenty years.

Janet Zelenka

  58, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer

Janet Zelenka was named SVP and CIO in April 2015. Ms. Zelenka joined Essendant in 2006 and has held leadership positions in business integration, finance, and pricing. Before joining Essendant, she held a variety of executive positions at SBC/Ameritech (now AT&T) including Chief Financial Officer of the IT division and Vice President of IT, as well as leadership roles in several areas including customer care, operations, financial planning/analytics, activity-based management, and internal audit. Ms. Zelenka has also served as President of the Essendant Charitable Foundation since January 2016.

Executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors. Except as required by individual employment agreements between executive officers and the Company, there exists no arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which such executive officer was elected. Each executive officer serves until his or her successor is appointed and qualified or until his or her earlier removal or resignation.

5


Availability of the Company’s Reports

The Company’s principal website address is www.Essendant.com. This site provides Essendant’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments and exhibits to those reports filed or furnished under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) for free as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, copies of these filings (excluding exhibits) may be requested at no cost by contacting the Investor Relations Department:

Essendant Inc.

Attn: Investor Relations Department

One Parkway North Boulevard

Suite 100

Deerfield, IL 60015-2559

Telephone: (847) 627-7000

E-mail: IR@ussco.comIR@essendant.com

 

 

 


6


ITEM  1A.  RISK FACTORS.

RISK FACTORS.

Any of the risks described below could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. These risks are not the only risks facing United;Essendant; the Company’s business operations could also be materially adversely affected by risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to UnitedEssendant or that UnitedEssendant currently deems immaterial.

Demand for office products may continue to decline.

The overall demand for certain office products may continue to weaken as consumers increasingly create, share, and store documents electronically, without printing or filing them. If demand continues to decline and United is unable to offset lower aggregate demand by increasing market share for these products, finding new markets for these products, increasing sales of products in other categories, and reducing expenses, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The loss of one or more significant customers could significantly reduce United’sEssendant’s revenues and profitability.

In 2014 United’s2016, Essendant’s largest customer accounted for approximately 12.0%11% of net sales and United’s topEssendant’s five largest customers accounted for approximately 28.1%25% of net sales. Several of United’sEssendant’s current and potential customers were involved in business combinations in 20142016 and 2015 and the Company expects increased customer consolidation in the future. In February 2015 two of United’s five largest customers announced they intend to merge. Following business combinations, the surviving companies often conduct “requests for proposal” or engage in other supplier reviews,review their supply chain and sourcing options, which can result in the companies altering their sourcing relationships. The Company generally does not have long-term contracts with its customers, which are typically free to reduce or terminate their purchases from the Company on little or no notice. Increasing direct purchases by major customers from manufacturers, as well as the loss of one or more key customers, changes in the sales mix or sales volume to key customers, or a significant downturn in the business or financial condition of any of them could significantly reduce United’sEssendant’s sales and profitability.

United’s operating results depend on employment rates

Price transparency, customer consolidation, and the strength of the general economy.changes in product sales mix may result in lower margins.

The customers that United serves are affected by changes in economic conditions outside the Company’s control, including national, regional,Company faces price and local slowdowns in general economic activity and job markets. Demand for the products and services the Company offers, particularly in the office product, technology, and furniture categories, is affected by themargin pressure due to a number of white collarfactors, including:

Increased price transparency, driven by online resellers;

Customer consolidation resulting in some customers increasing their buying power and other workers employed byseeking economic concessions from the businesses United’s customers serve. The persistent high unemployment rates over the last several years have adversely affected United’s resultsCompany;

Shift in customer mix from higher to lower margin channels and vertical markets;

Shift in category mix to a larger share of operations. lower margin categories;

Secular decline in office products categories leading to unfavorable product mix; and

Supplier consolidation.

If employment rates decline, do notEssendant is unable to reduce expenses, grow or continue to grow at a slow rate, demand for the products the Company sells could be adversely affected.

United may not achieve its growth, cost-reduction, and margin enhancement goals.

United has set goals to improve its profitability over time by reducing expenses, growing sales to existing and new customers, and increasingincrease sales of higher margin products as a percentage of total sales. There can be no assurance that United will achieve its enhanced profitability goals. Factors that could have a significant effect on the Company’s efforts to achieve these goals include the following:

·

Failure to achieve the Company’s revenue and margin growth objectives in its sales, channels and product categories;

·

Impact on sales and margins from competitive pricing pressures and customer consolidation;

·

Failure to maintain or improve the Company’s sales mix of higher margin products;

·

Inability to pass along cost increases from United’s suppliers to its customers;

·

Failure to increase sales of United’s private brand products; and

·

Failure of customers to adopt the Company’s product pricing and marketing programs.

United’s repositioning and restructuring activities may result in disruptions with suppliers and customers.

United is in the process of combining its United Stationers Supply division business and its Lagasse, LLC business onto a common platform with common systems and processes. United also is commencing a repositioning and restructuring initiative that includes rebranding United and its major operating businesses, exiting non-strategic channels, reducing its workforce and consolidating some of its distribution facilities. United is implementing these changes to its structure, corporate brand, organization, business processes, and technology systems to address evolving customer and end-user preferences and needs. These activities could disrupt United’s relationships with customers and suppliers or could impair the Company’s ability to timely and accurately record transactions, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.condition may be adversely affected.


United’sFor example, during 2016, despite the Company’s success at converting customers, profitability was adversely affected by margin pressure resulting from a shift in customer mix to lower margin customers and in product category mix to lower margin products. The transparency of pricing online also caused margin pressure.

Essendant relies on independent resellers for a significant percentage of its net sales.

Sales to independent resellers account for a significant portion of Essendant’s net sales. Independent resellers compete with national distributors and retailers that have substantially greater financial resources and technical and marketing capabilities. Financial, technical, and commercial constraints are challenging as business increasingly shifts online. Over the years, several of the Company’s independent reseller customers have been acquired by competitors or have ceased operation, and the Company expects independent reseller customers to continue to consolidate. If Essendant’s customer base of independent resellers declines and the Company is not able to replace resulting sales declines, the Company’s business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Essendant’s reliance on supplier allowances and promotional incentives could impact profitability.

Supplier allowances and promotional incentives that are often based on the volume of Company product purchases contribute significantly to United’sEssendant’s profitability. If UnitedEssendant does not comply with suppliers’ terms and conditions, or does not make requisite purchases to achieve certain volume hurdles, UnitedEssendant may not earn certain allowances and promotional incentives. For example, in 2016, as the Company executed its strategy to improve cash flow in part through lower inventory balances, a reduction in purchases from suppliers resulted in lower supplier allowances and promotional incentives, which contributed to unfavorable gross margin changes. Additionally, suppliers may reduce the allowances they pay UnitedEssendant if they conclude that the value UnitedEssendant creates does not justify the allowances. If United’sEssendant’s suppliers reduce or otherwise alter their allowances or promotional incentives, United’sEssendant’s profit margin for the sale of the products it purchases from those suppliers may decline. The loss or diminution of supplier allowances and promotional support could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

United relies on independent resellers for a significant percentage of its net sales.

Sales to independent resellers account for a significant portion of United’s net sales. Independent resellers compete with national distributors and retailers that have substantially greater financial resources and technical and marketing capabilities. Financial and technical constraints are increasingly challenging as business increasingly shifts online. Over the years, several As part of the Company’s independent reseller customers have been acquired by competitorsmulti-year transformation program, the Company has undertaken merchandising and sourcing initiatives to more effectively leverage supply relationships and enhance profitability. Failure to complete the process, incomplete attainment or have ceased operation. If United’s customer baseineffective management of independent resellersthe initiatives could cause declines the Company’s businessin profitability and results of operations may be adversely affected.operations.

United operates in a competitive environment.

The Company operates in a competitive environment. The Company competes with other wholesale distributors and with the manufacturers of the products the Company sells. In addition, the Company competes with warehouse clubs and the business-to-business sales divisions of national business products resellers. Competition is based largely upon service capabilities and price, as the Company’s competitors generally offer products that are the same as or similar to the products the Company offers to the same customers or potential customers. These competitive pressures are exacerbated by the ongoing decline in the overall demand for office products. The competitive arena is also increasingly shifting online. The Company’s financial condition and results of operations depend on its ability to compete effectively on price, product selection and availability, marketing support, logistics, and other ancillary services; diversify its product offering; and provide services and capabilities that enable its customers to succeed online.7


Supply chain disruptions or changes in key suppliers’ distribution strategies could decrease United’s revenues and profitability.

United believes its ability to offer a combination of well-known brand name products, competitively priced private brand products, and support services is an important factor in attracting and retaining customers. The Company’s ability to offer a wide range of products and services is dependent on obtaining adequate product supply and services from manufacturers or other suppliers. United’s agreements with its suppliers are generally terminable by either party on limited notice. The loss of, or a substantial decrease in the availability of products or services from key suppliers at competitive prices could cause the Company’s revenues and profitability to decrease. In addition, supply interruptions could arise due to transportation disruptions, labor disputes or other factors beyond United’s control. Disruptions in United’s supply chain could result in a decrease in revenues and profitability.

Some manufacturers refuse to sell their products to wholesalers like United. Other manufacturers only allow United to sell their products to specified customers. If changes in key suppliers’ distribution strategies or practices reduce the breadth of products the Company is able to purchase or the number of customers to whom United can sell key products, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Many of the Company’s independent resellers use third party technology vendors (“3PVs”) to automate their business operations. The 3PVs play an important role in the independent dealer channel, as most purchase orders, order confirmations, stock availability checks, invoices, and advanced shipping notices are exchanged between United and its independent resellers over 3PV networks. The 3PVs also provide e-commerce portals that United’s customers use to transact online business with their customers. If United is unable to transact business with its customers through one or more 3PVs on terms that are acceptable to United, or if a 3PV fails to provide quality services to United’s customers, United’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

A significant disruption or failure of the Company’s information technology systems or in its design, implementation or support of the information technology systems and e-commerce services it provides to customers could disrupt United’s business, result in increased costs and decreased revenues, harm the Company’s reputation, and expose the Company to liability.

The Company relies on information technology in all aspects of its business, including managing and replenishing inventory, filling and shipping customer orders, and coordinating sales and marketing activities. Several of the Company’s software applications are legacy systems which the Company must periodically update, enhance, and replace. A significant disruption or failure of the Company’s existing information technology systems or in the Company’s development and implementation of new systems could put it at a competitive disadvantage and could adversely affect its results of operations.


UnitedEssendant is exposed to the credit risk of its customers.

UnitedEssendant extends credit to its customers. The failure of a significant customer or a significant group of customers to timely pay all amounts due UnitedEssendant could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s trade receivables are generally unsecured or subordinated to other lenders, and many of the Company’s customers are highly leveraged. The extension of credit involves considerable judgment and is based on management’s evaluation of a variety of factors, including customers’ financial condition and payment history, the availability of collateral to secure customers’ receivables, and customers’ prospects for maintaining or increasing their sales revenues. There can be no assurance that UnitedEssendant has assessed and will continue to assess the creditworthiness of its existing or future customers accurately.

UnitedFor example, as of December 31, 2016, the Company recognized a $13.3 million allowance on prepaid rebates and receivables from one customer. This customer has timely paid all amounts due to Essendant; however, the collectability of the receivables over the long-term is in doubt. As of February 21, 2017, the Company had further exposure to this customer related to 2017 activity totaling approximately $18.0 million.

Essendant operates in a changing competitive environment.

The Company operates in a competitive and changing environment. Historically, the Company has competed with other wholesale distributors, manufacturers of the products the Company sells, warehouse clubs, the business-to-business sales divisions of national business products resellers. The Company is also increasingly competing with internet retailers that are selling to resellers, putting price and margin pressures on the Company. If the Company is unable to compete effectively with internet retailers and others in a changing market, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Supply chain disruptions or changes in key suppliers’ distribution strategies could decrease Essendant’s revenues and profitability.

Essendant believes its ability to offer a combination of well-known brand name products, competitively priced Essendant brand products, and support services is an important factor in attracting and retaining customers. The Company’s ability to offer a wide range of products and services is dependent on obtaining adequate product supply and services from manufacturers or other suppliers. Essendant’s agreements with its suppliers are generally terminable by either party on limited notice. The loss of, or a substantial decrease in the availability of products or services from key suppliers (in particular a large supplier, for example, the Hewlett Packard Company which represents approximately 20% of the Company’s total purchases in 2016) at competitive prices could cause the Company’s revenues and profitability to decrease. In addition, supply interruptions could arise due to transportation disruptions, labor disputes or other factors beyond Essendant’s control. Disruptions in Essendant’s supply chain could result in a decrease in revenues and profitability.

Some manufacturers refuse to sell their products to wholesalers like Essendant. Other manufacturers only allow Essendant to sell their products to specified customers. If changes in key suppliers’ distribution strategies or practices reduce the breadth of products the Company is able to purchase or the number of customers to whom Essendant can sell products, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Many of the Company’s independent resellers use third party technology vendors (“3PVs”) to automate their business operations. The 3PVs play an important role in the independent dealer channel, as most purchase orders, order confirmations, stock availability checks, invoices, and advanced shipping notices are exchanged between Essendant and its independent resellers over 3PV networks. The 3PVs also provide e-commerce portals that Essendant’s customers use to transact online business with their customers. If Essendant is unable to transact business with its customers through one or more 3PVs on terms that are acceptable to Essendant, or if a 3PV fails to provide quality services to Essendant’s customers, Essendant’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Demand for office products is expected to continue to decline.

The overall demand for certain office products has weakened and is expected to continue to decline as consumers increasingly create, share, and store documents electronically, without printing or filing them. Furthermore, many of the products that have experienced increased demand in recent years have lower margins than the products for which demand has declined. If demand continues to decline and Essendant is unable to offset lower aggregate demand by increasing market share for these products, finding new markets for these products, increasing sales of products in other product categories, and reducing expenses, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

8


Essendant may experience financial cycles related to broad economic factors due to secular consumer demand, recession or other events.

Sales of Essendant’s products have been affected by secular market pressures and are subject to cyclical fluctuations of material economic factors. Cyclical effects have been particularly notable in Industrial and Automotive. For example, in 2015, challenges in the oil and gas industries impacted the Company’s oilfield and welding sectors within its Industrial business, and these industries have not yet fully recovered. Cyclical changes in demand for the products the Company sells have affected and could continue to detrimentally affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Essendant may not be successful in implementing strategic objectives.

The Company is undertaking a comprehensive, multi-year transformation program that includes enhancements in merchandising, closer alignment of pricing with the cost to serve, stabilization of the JanSan sales channel, Industrial growth, additional cost reductions and reductions in working capital and debt. If Essendant is unable to efficiently, effectively and timely implement the program, the Company could experience diminished operating results as a result of the diversion of management’s time, attention and resources from managing the Company’s continuing operations, the incurrence of additional costs in connection with the program, disruption to customers and suppliers, or other factors. In addition, the Company’s merchandising efforts may result in changes in the product assortment offered by the Company and changes in or termination of relationships with certain suppliers. Suppliers adversely affected by the Company’s merchandising efforts may increase their direct sales to the Company’s customers or take other actions that adversely affect the Company. In addition, certain of our customers have preferences for products from suppliers whose products may not be part of our future core supply chain and merchandising strategy. If we are not able to, or choose not to, offer products from the suppliers our customers prefer, we may lose customer business, which could adversely impact our results of operation. The Company’s efforts to align pricing with the cost to serve may result in decreased sales to some customers.  

Essendant must manage inventory effectively while minimizing excess and obsolete inventory.

To maximize supplier allowances and minimize excess and obsolete inventory, UnitedEssendant must project end-consumer demand for over 160,000 items in stock.approximately 190,000 items. If UnitedEssendant underestimates demand for a particular manufacturer’s products, the Company will lose sales, reduce customer satisfaction, and earn a lower level of allowances from that manufacturer. If UnitedEssendant overestimates demand, it may have to liquidate excess or obsolete inventory at a price that would produce a lower margin, no margin, or a loss.

UnitedEssendant is focusing on increasing its sales of privateEssendant brand products. These products can present unique inventory challenges. UnitedEssendant sources some of its privateEssendant brand products overseas, resulting in longer order-lead times than for comparable products sourced domestically. These longer lead-times make it more difficult to forecast demand accurately and require larger inventory investments to support high service levels.

United

The Company relies heavily on the ability to recruit, retain, and develop high-performing managers and the lack of execution in these areas could harm the Company’s ability to carry out its business strategy.

Essendant’s ability to implement its business strategy depends largely on the efforts, skills, abilities, and judgment of the Company’s executive management team. Essendant’s success also depends to a significant degree on its ability to recruit and retain sales and marketing, operations, and other senior managers. For the last several years, the Company’s incentive compensation plans have paid out substantially below target. Our compensation arrangements, such as our management incentive plans, long-term incentive plans, and other compensatory arrangements, may not be successful in identifying, consummating,retaining and integrating future acquisitions.

Historically, part of United’s growthmotivating our existing employees and expansion intoattracting new product categoriesemployees or markets has come from targeted acquisitions. Going forward, Unitedthe Company may not be ableneed to identify attractive acquisition candidates or completetake more costly actions to attract and retain the acquisition of any identified candidates at favorable prices and upon advantageous terms. Furthermore, competition for attractive acquisition candidates may limit the number of acquisition candidates or increase the overall costs of making acquisitions. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including difficulties integrating acquired business systems and personnel with United’s business; the potential loss of key employees, customers or suppliers; the assumption of liabilities and exposuretalent needed to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; the difficulties in achieving target synergies; and the diversion of management attention and resources from existing operations. Difficulties in identifying, completing or integrating acquisitions could impede United’s revenues, profitability, and net worth. In addition, some oflead the Company’s acquisitions have included foreign operations, and future acquisitions may increase United’s international presence. International operations present a variety of unique risks, including the costs and difficulties of managing foreign enterprises, limitations on the repatriation and investment of funds, currency fluctuations, cultural differences that affect customer preferences and business practices, and unstable political or economic conditions.transformation plan.

The security of private information United’s customers provide could be compromised.

Through United’s sales, marketing, and e-commerce activities, the Company collects and stores personally identifiable information and credit card data that customers provide when they buy products or services, enroll in promotional programs, or otherwise communicate with United. United also gathers and retains information about its employees in the normal course of business. United uses vendors to assist with certain aspects of United’s business and, to enable the vendors to perform services for United, the Company shares some of the information provided by customers and employees. Similarly, to enable United to provide goods and services to its customers, United’s customers share with United information their customers provide to them. Loss or breaches in security that result in disclosure of customer or business information by United or its vendors could disrupt the Company’s operations and expose United to claims from customers, financial institutions, regulators, payment card associations, and other persons, any of which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, compliance with more stringent privacy and information security laws and standards may result in significant expense due to increased investment in technology and the development of new operational processes.

The Company is subject to costs and risks associated with laws, regulations, and industry standards affecting United’sEssendant’s business.

UnitedEssendant is subject to a wide range of state, federal, and foreign laws and industry standards, including laws and standards regarding labor and employment, government contracting, product liability, the storage and transportation of hazardous materials, privacy and data security, imports and exports, tax, and intellectual property, as well as laws relating to the Company’s international operations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and foreign tax laws. These laws, regulations, and standards may change, sometimes significantly, as a result of political or economic events. The complex legal and regulatory environment exposes UnitedEssendant to compliance and litigation costs and risks that could materially affect United’sEssendant’s operations and financial results.


United’s

For example, the Company has been named as a defendant in two lawsuits alleging that the Company sent unsolicited fax advertisements to certain named plaintiffs, as well as other persons and entities, in violation of various consumer protection acts. Although the Company is vigorously contesting and denies that any violations occurred, the Company’s ultimate liability may be material. See Part II, Item 8, Note 18 – “Legal Matters.”

9


A significant disruption or failure of the Company’s information technology systems could disrupt Essendant’s business, result in increased costs and decreased revenues, harm the Company’s reputation, and expose the Company to liability.

The Company relies on information technology in all aspects of its business, including managing and replenishing inventory, filling and shipping customer orders, and coordinating sales and marketing activities. The Company regularly refreshes, enhances and adds information technology systems and infrastructure, and any such changes create a possibility for disruption or failure of the Company’s existing information technology, which could put the Company at a competitive disadvantage and could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations. Additionally, further efforts to align portions of its business on common platforms, systems and processes could result in unforeseen interruptions, increased costs, decreased revenues, diminished Company reputation to its customers and suppliers, increased liability and other negative effects.

A breach of the Company’s information technology systems could result in costly enforcement actions and litigation and could harm the Company’s reputation and relationships.

Through Essendant’s sales, marketing, and e-commerce activities, the Company collects and stores personally identifiable information and credit card data that customers provide when they buy products or services, enroll in promotional programs, or otherwise communicate with Essendant. Essendant also gathers and retains information about its employees in the normal course of business. Essendant uses suppliers to assist with certain aspects of Essendant’s business and, to enable the suppliers to perform services for Essendant, the Company shares some of the information provided by customers and employees. Similarly, to enable Essendant to provide goods and services customer information is shared. Essendant has, from time to time, experienced attempts to breach its systems, and these attempts are expected to continue. Any loss, unauthorized access to or misuse of the Company’s information technology systems could disrupt the Company’s operations, expose Essendant to claims from customers, financial institutions, regulators, payment card associations, and other persons, and damage the Company’s reputation. In addition, compliance with more stringent privacy and information security laws and standards may result in significant expense due to increased investment in technology and the development of new operational processes.  

Essendant’s financial condition and results of operations depend on the availability of financing sources to meet its business needs.

The Company depends on various external financing sources to fund its operating, investing, and financing activities. The Company’s financing agreements include covenants bymaximum revolving borrowings at any time under the 2017 Credit Agreement (defined below) is the lesser of the lenders’ revolving commitments thereunder or the value of the Company’s borrowing base. The borrowing base for the revolving commitments is comprised of a certain percentage of eligible accounts receivables, real estate and equipment, plus a certain percentage of eligible inventory, minus reserves and the borrowing base for the term loan commitments is comprised of a certain percentage of eligible real property and equipment. If borrowing availability under the 2017 Credit Agreement falls below a certain threshold, the Company to maintain certain financial ratios andmust comply with other obligations. certain obligations and restrictions, including additional restrictions on the Company’s ability to make acquisitions and investments, dispose of assets, repurchase shares of the Company’s stock, and pay dividends.

If the Company violates a covenant or otherwise defaults on its obligations under a financing agreement, the Company’s lenders may refuse to extend additional credit, demand repayment of outstanding indebtedness, and terminate the financing agreements.agreements, and exercise their rights and remedies including, with respect to the lenders under the 2017 Credit Agreement, their rights as secured creditors. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” included below under Item 7.

The Company’s primary external financing sources terminate or mature in three to six years. If the Company defaults on its obligations under a financing agreement or is unable to obtain or renew financing sources on commercially reasonable terms, its business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

The Company relies heavily on the ability to recruit, retain, and develop high-performing managers and the lack of execution in these areas could harm the Company’s ability to carry out its business strategy.

United’s ability to implement its business strategy depends largely on the efforts, skills, abilities, and judgment of the Company’s executive management team. United’s success also depends to a significant degree on its ability to recruit and retain sales and marketing, operations, and other senior managers. The CompanyEssendant may not be successful in attractingidentifying or consummating future acquisitions.

Historically, part of Essendant’s growth and retaining these employees, whichexpansion into new product categories or markets has come from targeted acquisitions. Essendant may in turnnot be able to identify attractive acquisition candidates or complete the acquisition of any identified candidates at favorable prices and upon advantageous terms. In addition, some of the Company’s acquisitions have an adverse effectincluded foreign operations, and future acquisitions or other strategic alternatives may increase Essendant’s international presence. International operations present a variety of unique risks, including the costs and difficulties of managing foreign enterprises, limitations on the Company’s resultsrepatriation and investment of operationsfunds, currency fluctuations, cultural differences that affect customer preferences and financial condition.business practices, and unstable political or economic conditions.

Unexpected events could disrupt normal business operations, which might result in increased costs and decreased revenues.

Unexpected events, such as hurricanes, fire, war, terrorism, and other natural or man-made disruptions, may adversely impact United’sEssendant’s ability to serve its customers and increase the cost of doing business or otherwise impact United’sEssendant’s financial performance. In addition, damage to or loss of use of significant aspects of the Company’s infrastructure due to such events could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

 

 

10


ITEMITEM  1B.

UNRESOLVED COMMENT LETTERS.

None.

 

ITEMITEM  2.

PROPERTIES.

The Company considers its properties to be suitable with adequate capacity for their intended uses. The Company evaluates its properties on an ongoing basis to improve efficiency and customer service and leverage potential economies of scale. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company’s properties consisted of the following:

Offices. The Company leases approximately 205,000200,000 square feet for its corporate headquarters in Deerfield, Illinois. Additionally, the Company owns 49,000 square feet of office space in Orchard Park, New York andYork; leases 58,00038,000 square feet of office space in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and 10,000Oklahoma; leases 12,000 square feet in Pasadena, California.California; and leases 11,000 square feet in Atlanta, Georgia.

Distribution Centers. The Company utilizes 7770 distribution centers totaling approximately 12.713.1 million square feet of warehouse space. Of the 12.7 million square feetspace, of distribution center space, 2.1which 2.0 million square feet are owned and 10.611.1 million square feet are leased.

 

 

ITEMITEM  3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is involved inFor information regarding legal proceedings, arising in the ordinary course of or incidental to its business. The Company has established reserves, which are not material, for potential losses that are probable and reasonably estimable that may result from those proceedings. In many cases, however, it is difficult to determine whether a loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, particularly where proceedings may be in relatively early stages or where plaintiffs are seeking substantial or indeterminate damages. Matters frequently need to be more developed before a loss or range of loss can reasonably be estimated. The Company believes that pending legal proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect upon its financial condition or results of operations.see Part II, Item 8, Note 18 - “Legal Matters.”

 

 

ITEMITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE.

Not applicable.


 

 



PART II

 

 

ITEMITEM  5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Common Stock Information

USI’sESND’s common stock is quoted through the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol USTR.ESND. The following table shows the high and low closing sale prices per share for USI’sESND’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ:

 

High

 

 

Low

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

$

45.88

 

 

$

39.56

 

Second Quarter

42.18

 

 

 

37.00

 

Third Quarter

42.49

 

 

37.57

 

Fourth Quarter

43.05

 

 

36.72

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

$

39.15

 

 

$

31.86

 

Second Quarter

38.74

 

 

 

31.50

 

Third Quarter

 

43.90

 

 

 

34.50

 

Fourth Quarter

46.02

 

 

42.24

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 1 - March 31

$

32.18

 

 

$

25.60

 

 

$

44.16

 

 

$

38.82

 

April 1 - June 30

 

34.56

 

 

 

29.01

 

 

42.47

 

 

 

38.50

 

July 1 - September 30

32.49

 

 

18.84

 

 

39.38

 

 

31.83

 

October 1 - December 31

21.67

 

 

15.05

 

 

36.64

 

 

31.48

 

On February 13, 2015,21, 2017, the closing sale price of Company’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ was $44.16$21.74 per share. For the period from January 1, 2017 to February 21, 2017, the high closing sale price during the period was $21.74, while the low closing sale price during the period was $19.86. On February 13, 2015,21, 2017, there were approximately 698436 holders of record of common stock. A greater number of holders of USIESND common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held ofon record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.


Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the performance of the Company’s common stock over a five-year period with the cumulative total returns of (1) The NASDAQ Stock MarketRussell 2000 Index (U.S. companies), and (2) a group of companies included within Value Line’s Office Equipment Industry Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 20092011 in the Company’s common stock and in each of the indices and assumes reinvestment of all dividends (if any) at the date of payment. The following stock price performance graph is presented pursuant to SEC rules and is not meant to be an indication of future performance.

 

 

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Stationers (USTR)

 

$

100.00

 

$

112.18

 

$

116.38

 

$

112.88

 

$

169.62

 

$

157.98

 

NASDAQ (U.S. Companies)

 

$

100.00

 

$

117.55

 

$

117.91

 

$

137.29

 

$

183.25

 

$

206.09

 

Value Line Office Equipment

 

$

100.00

 

$

116.15

 

$

87.43

 

$

82.49

 

$

140.04

 

$

175.83

 

12


Common Stock Repurchases

During 2014,2016, the Company repurchased 1.30.2 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $50.6$6.8 million. During 2013,2015, the Company repurchased 1.71.8 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $62.1$67.4 million. On February 11, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase an additional $100 million of common stock. As of February 13, 2015,21, 2017, the Company had approximately $136.4$68.2 million remaining under share repurchase authorizations from its Board of Directors.

Purchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market, and business conditions and other factors, the Company may continue or suspend purchasing its common stock at any time without notice.

Acquired shares are included in the issued shares of the Company and treasury stock, but are not included in average shares outstanding when calculating earnings per share data.


The following table reports purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 20142016 by the Company and any affiliated purchasers pursuant to SEC rules, including any treasury shares withheld to satisfy employee withholding obligations upon vesting of restricted stock and the execution of stock option exercises.

 

Period

 

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

 

 

Average Price

Paid per Share

 

 

Total Number of

Shares Purchased as

Part of a Publicly

Announced Program

 

 

Approximate Dollar

Value of Shares that

May Yet Be

Purchased Under

the Program

 

October 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

68,160,702

 

November 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

68,160,702

 

December 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

68,160,702

 

         Total Fourth Quarter

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

68,160,702

 

 

Period

 

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

 

 

Average Price

Paid per Share

 

 

Total Number of

Shares Purchased as

Part of a Publicly

Announced Program

 

 

Approximate Dollar

Value of Shares that

May Yet Be

Purchased Under

the Program

 

October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

50,000,029

 

November 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014

 

 

72,867

 

 

 

42.24

 

 

 

72,867

 

 

 

46,921,899

 

December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

 

 

108,264

 

 

 

41.35

 

 

 

108,264

 

 

 

42,445,422

 

         Total Fourth Quarter

 

 

181,131

 

 

$

41.71

 

 

 

181,131

 

 

$

42,445,422

 

Stock and Cash Dividends

The Company declares and pays dividends on a quarterly basis. During 20132016 and 2014,2015, the Company declared and paid a dividend of $0.14 per share per quarter. In the aggregate, the Company declared dividends of $21.8M$20.6 million and $22.4M$21.1 million in 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. On February 22, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.14 to be paid on April 14, 2017 to shareholders of record as of March 15, 2017. See Part II, Item 8, Note 11 – “Debt” for restrictions on the Company’s ability to repurchase stock or issue dividends.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K (Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans) is included in Item 12 of this Annual Report.

 

13



ITEMITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected consolidated financial data of the Company for the years ended December 31, 20102012 through 20142016 have been derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The adoption of new accounting pronouncements, changes in certain accounting policies, and reclassifications are reflected in the financial information presented below. The selected consolidated financial data below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included in Items 7 and 8, respectively, of this Annual Report. Except for per share data, all amounts presented are in thousands:

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2010(4)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

$

5,327,205

 

 

$

5,085,293

 

 

$

5,080,106

 

 

$

5,005,501

 

 

$

4,832,237

 

$

5,369,022

 

 

$

5,363,046

 

 

$

5,327,205

 

 

$

5,085,293

 

 

$

5,080,106

 

Cost of goods sold

 

4,516,704

 

 

 

4,295,715

 

 

 

4,305,502

 

 

 

4,265,422

 

 

 

4,101,682

 

 

4,609,161

 

 

 

4,526,551

 

 

 

4,524,676

 

 

 

4,297,952

 

 

 

4,303,778

 

Gross profit(1)

 

810,501

 

 

 

789,578

 

 

 

774,604

 

 

 

740,079

 

 

 

730,555

 

 

759,861

 

 

 

836,495

 

 

 

802,529

 

 

 

787,341

 

 

 

776,328

 

Operating expenses(1)(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses

 

592,050

 

 

 

580,428

 

 

 

573,693

 

 

 

541,752

 

 

 

520,754

 

 

629,825

 

 

 

675,913

 

 

 

595,673

 

 

 

578,958

 

 

 

573,645

 

Loss on disposition of business

 

8,234

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Defined benefit plan settlement loss

 

12,510

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Impairments of goodwill and intangible assets

 

-

 

 

 

129,338

 

 

 

9,034

 

 

 

1,183

 

 

 

-

 

Loss (gain) on disposition of business

 

-

 

 

 

1,461

 

 

 

(800

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Operating income

 

210,217

 

 

 

209,150

 

 

 

200,911

 

 

 

198,327

 

 

 

209,801

 

 

117,526

 

 

 

29,783

 

 

 

198,622

 

 

 

207,200

 

 

 

202,683

 

Interest expense

 

16,234

 

 

 

12,233

 

 

 

23,619

 

 

 

27,592

 

 

 

26,229

 

 

24,143

 

 

 

20,580

 

 

 

16,234

 

 

 

12,233

 

 

 

23,619

 

Interest income

 

(500

)

 

 

(593

)

 

 

(343

)

 

 

(223

)

 

 

(237

)

 

(1,272

)

 

 

(996

)

 

 

(500

)

 

 

(593

)

 

 

(343

)

Other (income) expense, net(2)

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,918

)

 

 

809

 

Income before income taxes

 

194,483

 

 

 

197,510

 

 

 

177,635

 

 

 

172,876

 

 

 

183,000

 

 

94,655

 

 

 

10,199

 

 

 

182,888

 

 

 

195,560

 

 

 

179,407

 

Income tax expense

 

75,285

 

 

 

74,340

 

 

 

65,805

 

 

 

63,880

 

 

 

70,243

 

Net income

$

119,198

 

 

$

123,170

 

 

$

111,830

 

 

$

108,996

 

 

$

112,757

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share—basic

$

3.08

 

 

$

3.11

 

 

$

2.77

 

 

$

2.49

 

 

$

2.43

 

Net income per common share—diluted

$

3.05

 

 

$

3.06

 

 

$

2.73

 

 

$

2.42

 

 

$

2.34

 

Income tax expense(3)

 

30,803

 

 

 

54,541

 

 

 

70,773

 

 

 

73,507

 

 

 

66,526

 

Net income (loss)

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

 

$

122,053

 

 

$

112,881

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share—basic

$

1.75

 

 

$

(1.18

)

 

$

2.90

 

 

$

3.08

 

 

$

2.80

 

Net income (loss) per common share—diluted

$

1.73

 

 

$

(1.18

)

 

$

2.87

 

 

$

3.03

 

 

$

2.75

 

Cash dividends declared per share

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.53

 

 

$

0.52

 

 

$

-

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.53

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

$

981,344

 

 

$

835,285

 

 

$

755,578

 

 

$

767,761

 

 

$

750,653

 

$

904,715

 

 

$

956,588

 

 

$

968,894

 

 

$

829,917

 

 

$

751,327

 

Total assets

 

2,370,217

 

 

 

2,116,194

 

 

 

2,075,204

 

 

 

1,994,882

 

 

 

1,908,663

 

 

2,163,506

 

 

 

2,262,859

 

 

 

2,347,368

 

 

 

2,104,019

 

 

 

2,065,847

 

Total debt(3)

 

713,909

 

 

 

533,697

 

 

 

524,376

 

 

 

496,757

 

 

 

441,800

 

Total debt(4)

 

608,969

 

 

 

716,315

 

 

 

710,768

 

 

 

530,306

 

 

 

521,853

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

856,118

 

 

 

825,514

 

 

 

738,092

 

 

 

704,679

 

 

 

759,598

 

 

781,106

 

 

 

723,734

 

 

 

843,667

 

 

 

820,146

 

 

 

733,841

 

Statement of Cash Flows Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

77,133

 

 

$

74,737

 

 

$

189,814

 

 

$

130,363

 

 

$

114,823

 

$

130,942

 

 

$

162,734

 

 

$

77,133

 

 

$

74,737

 

 

$

189,814

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(183,633

)

 

 

(30,273

)

 

 

(107,266

)

 

 

(27,918

)

 

 

(42,745

)

 

(3,769

)

 

 

(67,929

)

 

 

(183,633

)

 

 

(30,273

)

 

 

(107,266

)

Net cash used in provided by financing activities

 

105,968

 

 

 

(53,060

)

 

 

(63,457

)

 

 

(111,929

)

 

 

(69,355

)

 

(135,964

)

 

 

(84,990

)

 

 

105,968

 

 

 

(53,060

)

 

 

(63,457

)

(1) 20142015 $8.2 Includes $4.9 million related to Industrial obsolescence reserve.

(2) 2016 — Includes $20.5 million gain on sale of City of Industry facility, $12.5 million charge related to defined benefit plan settlement, $4.0 million charge related to litigation reserve, $1.2 million charge related to severance costs for operating leadership, $0.9 million reversal of 2015 restructuring expenses partially offset by 2016 facility charges and a $0.6 million reserve related to uncertain tax positions taken in the prior year.

      2015 — $115.8 million charge related to Industrial impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, $18.6 million charge related to workforce reductions and facility consolidations, a $17.0 million loss on sale and related costs of our Mexican subsidiary, $12.0 million intangible asset impairment charge related to rebranding and accelerated amortization related to rebranding efforts, and $10.7 million impairment of seller notes receivable related to the Company’s prior year sale of a software service provider.

     2014 — $8.2 million loss on disposition of business.a software service provider.

     2013 2013$13.0 $13.0 million charge for a workforce reduction and facility closures and a $1.2 million asset impairment charge.

     2012 2012$6.2 $6.2 million charge for a distribution network optimization and cost reduction program.  2011—$0.7

(3) Includes $1.7 million reversalrelated to tax effect of a chargedividend from a foreign subsidiary in 2016 and the tax effects for early retirement/workforce realignment, $4.4 million chargeitems noted above for a transition agreement with the company’s former Chief Executive Officer, and a $1.6 million asset impairment charge. 2010—$11.9 million liability reversal for vacation pay policy change, $8.8 million liability reversal for Retiree Medical Plan termination, and $9.1 million charge for early retirement/workforce realignment.each respective year.

(2) 2011—a reversal of prior acquisition earn-out and deferred payment liabilities. 2010—an accounting charge to bring prior acquisition earn-out liabilities to fair value.

(3)(4) Total debt includes current maturities where applicable.

(4) 2010 share and per share amounts reflect a two-for-one stock split in May 2011.14



FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “will”, “is likely”, “scheduled”, “positioned to”, “continue”, “forecast”, “predicting”, “projection”, “potential” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include references to goals, plans, strategies, objectives, projected costs or savings, anticipated future performance, results or events and other statements that are not strictly historical in nature. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, forecasts and assumptions. This means they involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied here. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, those set forth abovein Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors.”

Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The forward-looking information herein is given as of this date only, and the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update it.

 

ITEMITEM  7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with both the information at the end of Item 6 ofincluded in this Annual Report on Form 10-K appearing under the caption, “Forward Looking Information”,in Part I, Item 1 – Description of Business, Item 6 – Selected Financial Data and the Company’s Consolidatedin Item 8 – Financial Statements and related notes contained in Item 8Supplementary Data. Please see the reconciliation of this Annual Report.Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below for information concerning the reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP financial measures.

Company Overview

The Company is a leading supplier of workplace essentials, with 2014 net sales of approximately $5.3 billion. The Company sells its products through a national distribution network of 77 distribution centers to over 30,000 resellers, who in turn sell directly to end consumers.

Our strategy is comprised of three key elements:

1) Strengthen our core office, janitorial, and breakroom business with a common operating and IT platform, an aligned customer care and sales team, and advanced digital services;

2) Win online by growing our business-to-business (B2B) sales with major e-commerce players, and by enabling the online success of our resellers by providing digital capabilities and tools to support them; and

3) Expand and diversify our business into higher growth and higher margin channels and categories.

Execution on these priorities will help us achieve our goal of becoming the fastest and most convenient solution for workplace essentials.

Key Trends and Recent Results

The following isResults for 2016 were negatively affected by a summaryshift in customer mix to lower margin customers and in product category mix to lower margin products. Results were also adversely impacted by lower volumes of selectedinventory purchases, which resulted in lower supplier allowances and promotional incentives, as well as by the recognition of an allowance on prepaid rebates and receivables from one customer. We are implementing strategies to address these market trends, events or uncertainties thatbut we expect the Company believes may havetrends will continue to impact our liquidity, capital resources and results of operations in subsequent periods, with 2017 net sales expected to be flat to down 4% compared to 2016. We expect net sales in 2017 to be adversely affected by the decision of a significant impact onlarge national big-box retailer to shift its future performance.purchases of JanSan products to other sources and by Staples’ acquisition of a large regional customer.

Recent Results

·

Diluted earnings per share for 2014 were $3.05 compared to $3.06 in 2013. Adjusted earnings per share in 2014 was $3.26 compared to adjusted earnings per share of $3.29 in 2013. Refer to the Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share table included later in this section for more detail on the adjustments.

Diluted earnings (loss) per share for 2016 were $1.73 compared to $(1.18) in 2015, including impacts of the Actions discussed below. Non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share in 2016 were $1.54 compared to adjusted earnings per share of $3.08 in 2015. Refer to the Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted Operating Expenses, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow table (the “Non-GAAP table”) included later in this section for more detail on the Actions.

·

Sales increased 4.8% to $5.3 billion comprised of organic sales representing 2.9% and the acquisitions of CPO and MEDCO adding 1.9% of the increase. This included 23.4% growth in the industrial supplies product category, with our 2014 acquisitions of CPO and MEDCO accounting for almost 19.0% of the growth. The janitorial and breakroom supplies category sales also grew by over 8.0% versus 2013. Sales in the traditional office product category were up 1.0% over 2013.  These results were impacted by softening market conditions but aided by continued implementation of strategic initiatives including expanding market coverage and growing wholesale penetration in these categories. This growth was partially offset by a decline in technology products of nearly 2.0%. The furniture category sales were down approximately 1.0% compared with the prior year.

Sales decreased 0.3%, workday adjusted, to $5.4 billion, driven by reduced sales in JanSan, industrial supplies, office furniture and technology products, partly offset by growth in the cut-sheet paper product and automotive product categories.

·

Gross margin as a percent of sales for 2014 was 15.2% versus 15.5% in 2013. Gross margin included a favorable 10 basis points from acquisitions. Excluding the acquisitions, gross margin declined due to a shift in customer and product mix and higher net freight costs.

Gross margin as a percent of sales for 2016 was 14.2% versus 15.6% in 2015, including impacts of the Actions discussed below. Gross margin was primarily impacted by customer mix and higher freight costs. Adjusted gross margin was $759.9 million or 14.2% of sales in 2016 as compared to $841.4 million or 15.7% of sales in 2015.

Operating expenses in 2016 totaled $642.3 million or 12.0% of sales compared with $806.7 or 15.0% of sales in 2015, including impacts of the Actions discussed below. Adjusted operating expenses in 2016 increased to $645.4 million or 12.0% of sales compared to $632.6 million or 11.8% of sales in 2015, principally driven by the recognition of an allowance totaling $13.3 million on prepaid rebates and receivables from one customer.

Operating income in 2016 was $117.5 million or 2.2% of sales, compared with $29.8 million or 0.6% of sales in the prior year, including impacts of the Actions discussed below. Adjusted operating income in 2016 was $114.4 million or 2.1% of sales, compared with $208.8 million or 3.9% of sales in 2015, resulting from reduced gross margin in the current year.

Operating cash flows for 2016 were $130.9 million versus $162.7 million in 2015. The 2016 reduction was primarily attributable to reduced gross margin generated from sales and reduced accounts payable balances, partially offset by reduced accounts receivable and inventory balances.

Cash flow used in investing activities was $3.8 million in 2016 as compared to $67.9 million in the prior year, due primarily to acquisitions consummated in 2015 and the proceeds from the sale of the City of Industry facility in 2016.

Cash outflows from financing activities increased $51.0 million due primarily to credit facility repayments during 2016, partially offset by reduced share repurchase activity as compared to 2015.

During 2016, the Company repurchased 0.2 million shares for $6.8 million and also paid $20.5 million in dividends.

In February 2017, the Company replaced two of its financing agreements with a new credit agreement to provide enhanced liquidity and increase debt availability.


·

Actions impacting comparability of results (the “Actions”)

Operating expenses in 2014 totaled $600.3 million or 11.3% of sales compared with $580.4 or 11.4% of sales in 2013. Adjusted operating expenses in 2014 were $592.0 million or 11.1% of sales, excluding the effects of an $8.2 million charge related to a loss on disposition of MBS Dev. Adjusted operating expenses in 2013 were $566.3 million or 11.1% of sales, which excluded a $13.0 million charge related to workforce reduction and facility closures, and a $1.2 million non-tax deductible asset impairment charge.

·

Operating income in 2014 was $210.2 million or 3.9% of sales, compared with $209.1 million or 4.1% of sales in the prior year. Adjusted operating income was $218.5 million or 4.1% of sales, compared with $223.3 million or 4.4% of sales in 2013, reflecting the lower gross margin rate in 2014.

·

Operating cash flows for 2014 were $77.1 million versus $74.7 million in 2013. 2014 operating cash flows were impacted by increased inventory levels, lower accounts payable and higher accounts receivable. Cash flow used in investing activities for capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, totaled $25.0 million in 2014 compared with $33.8 million in 2013. Net of cash acquired, we used $161.4 million in 2014 to acquire CPO and MEDCO.

·

During 2014, the Company repurchased 1.3 million shares for $50.6 million and also paid $21.8 million in dividends during the year.

·

The Company had approximately $1.05 billion of total committed debt capacity at December 31, 2014. Outstanding debt at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $713.9 million and $533.7 million, respectively. Debt-to-total capitalization at the end of 2014 increased to 45.5% from 39.3% for the prior year due to the acquisition of MEDCO in the fourth quarter of 2014.

 

RepositioningIn 2016, the Company entered into a two-year operating lease agreement in connection with the disposition of its City of Industry facility. The sale of the facility resulted in a $20.5 million gain. Refer to Item 8, Note 12 – “Leases, Contractual Obligations and Contingencies” for Sustained Successfurther details of this transaction.

2014

·

On May 30, 2014, we acquired CPO, a leading e-retailer of brand name power tools and equipment.  The purchase price was $37.4 million, which includes $5.1 million related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration which will be paid, to the extent earned based on sales conditions, by the end of the three year earn-out period.  The earn-out payment will be between zero and $10.0 million.  This transaction significantly expanded United’s digital resources and capabilities to support resellers as they transition to an increasingly online environment.  CPO’s expertise will strengthen United’s ability to deliver such features as improved product content, real-time access to inventory and pricing, and digital marketing and merchandising.  CPO also provides an enhanced digital platform to our manufacturing partners.  In 2014, CPO profitability was neutral to earnings per share and operating income.  During the first year of ownership, we expect this acquisition to positively impact gross margin as a percent of sales and to have a slightly accretive impact on earnings per share.

·

On October 31, 2014, we acquired Liberty Bell Equipment Corp, a United States wholesaler of automotive aftermarket tools and supplies, and its affiliates (collectively MEDCO) including G2S Equipment de Fabrication et d'Entretien ULC, a Canadian wholesaler.  The purchase price was $150.0 million, which includes $4.8 million related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration which will be paid, to the extent earned based on sales and margin conditions, by the end of the three year earn-out period. The earn-out payment will be between zero and $10.0 million. MEDCO advances a key pillar of our strategy, diversification into higher growth and margin channels and categories. In 2014, MEDCO was accretive to earnings per share.  During the first year of ownership, we expect this acquisition to add over $250.0 million in revenue, $13.0 million to $15.0 million of operating income, and be accretive to earnings per share.

A voluntary lump-sum pension offering was completed in the second quarter of 2016 and resulted in a significant reduction of interest rate, mortality and investment risk of the Essendant Pension Plan. Due to this offer, a settlement and remeasurement of the Essendant Pension Plan was required, resulting in a defined benefit plan settlement loss of $12.5 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to Item 8, Note 13 - “Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”, for further information on the remeasurement and voluntary lump sum program.

·

In 2016, the Company recognized an accrual of $4.0 million related to ongoing Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) litigation. Refer to Item 8, Note 18 – “Legal Matters” for further details.

On December 16, 2014, we sold MBS Dev, a subsidiary focused on software solutions for distribution companies.  In conjunction with this sale, we recognized an $8.2 million loss on the disposition of the business. This consisted of a $9.0 million goodwill impairment and a $0.8 million gain on disposal as the carrying value of the entity was less than the total value of the consideration received.

2015

·

Our initiative to combine the office products and janitorial operating platforms will help us become the fastest most convenient solution for our customers’ workplace essentials through our nationwide distribution network and logistics capabilities, order efficiency with enhanced ecommerce capabilities, broad product portfolio, superior product category knowledge and commercial expertise. Implementation will begin in mid-2015 and will cascade into the first half of 2016. This initiative had a cost of approximately $4.0 million in 2014 and is expected to be approximately $15.0 million in 2015.  Upon completion, we expect operating cost savings through continued network consolidation and reduced expenses of $15.0 to $20.0 million on an annual basis beginning in 2016.

·

Restructuring actions will be taken in 2015 to improve our operational utilization, labor spend and inventory performance.  This will include workforce reductions and facility consolidations, cascading over five quarters beginning in the first quarter of 2015.  The estimated expense impact is approximately $7.0 million in the first quarter of 2015 and approximately $9.0 million for the full year of 2015. We expect these actions will produce cost savings of approximately $6.0 million, for a net cost of $3.0 million, in 2015 and approximately $10.0 million in savings in 2016.

In 2016, the Company recognized the tax impact of settlement of a dividend from a foreign subsidiary of $1.7 million.

·

Exiting non-strategic channels and categories will continue during 2015 to further align our portfolio of product categories and channels with our strategies. In the first quarter of 2015, we began active sales efforts for a non-strategic subsidiary.  We currently are estimating a $12.0 to $16.0 million non-cash charge in the first quarter of 2015 relating to

In 2016, the Company incurred charges of $1.2 million related to severance costs for two members of the Company’s operating leadership team.


In 2016, the Company recognized a $0.6 million reserve related to discrete prior year uncertain tax positions. Refer to Item 8, Note 15 – “Income taxes” for further details of associated reserves.

classifying the entity as held-for-sale, with possible additional impacts during 2015 related to transaction costs and foreign exchange volatility.  This subsidiary had sales of $104.0 million in 2014 and had no impact on earnings per share.

Charges totaling $120.7 million relating to the Industrial business unit were incurred in the fourth quarter of 2015. These charges were comprised of an impairment of goodwill and intangibles totaling $115.8 million and an increase in reserves for obsolete inventory of $4.9 million. These impacts are the result of the macroeconomic environment in the oilfield and energy sectors.

·

We will change our Company name and brand to consistently communicate our purpose and vision.  The non-cash impairment is expected to be approximately $10.0 million in the first quarter of 2015 and $12.0 million for the full year of 2015.

Restructuring actions were taken in 2015 to improve our operational utilization, labor spend, inventory performance and functional alignment of the organization. This included workforce reductions and facility consolidations with an unfavorable impact of $18.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the impact of these actions was favorable, including a $1.2 million reversal of restructuring expenses due to the release of severance accruals, partially offset by a $0.3 million facility consolidation charge.

·

As we accelerate our strategy by executing these repositioning actions, we expect the percentage growth of earnings per share to be in the low single-digits in 2015.

In 2015 we sold Azerty de Mexico, our operations in Mexico. The total charges in 2015 related to the disposition of this subsidiary were $17.0 million. In 2015, this subsidiary had net sales of $50.1 million and operating loss of $5.0 million, excluding the charges previously mentioned.

In 2015, we officially rebranded the Company to Essendant Inc. to communicate the Company’s strategy in a consistent manner. When we announced in the first quarter of 2015 our decision to rebrand the company, the ORS Nasco trademark and certain OKI brands were determined to be impaired. Pre-tax, non-cash, impairment charges and accelerated amortization totaling $12.0 million were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2015.

In 2014, the Company sold its subsidiary that provided software services in exchange for a combination of cash and convertible and non-convertible notes. In conjunction with this sale, in 2014 the Company recognized an $8.2 million loss on the disposition of the business. This consisted of a $9.0 million goodwill impairment and a $0.8 million gain on disposal as the carrying value of the entity was less than the total value of the consideration received. Based upon subsequent information, the Company determined it will not be able to collect the note amounts or other receivables due from the acquirer. As such, the Company fully impaired the receivables and recorded a loss of $10.7 million during 2015.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

The Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. As described in Item 8, Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

The Company’s critical accounting policies are those which are most significant to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require especially difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates by management. In most cases, critical accounting policies require management to make estimates on matters that are uncertain at the time the estimate is made. The basis for the estimates is historical experience, terms of existing contracts, observance of industry trends, information provided by customers or vendors,suppliers, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. These critical accounting policies include the following:

16


Supplier Allowances

Supplier allowances are common practice in the business products industry and have a significant impact on the Company’s overall gross margin. Receivables related to supplier allowances totaled $124.4$86.9 million and $103.2$111.0 million as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

The majority of the Company’s annual supplier allowances and incentives are variable, based solely on the volume and mix of the Company’s product purchases from suppliers. These variable allowances are recorded based on the Company’s annual inventory purchase volumes and product mix and are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as a reduction to cost of goods sold, thereby reflecting the net inventory purchase cost. The potential amount of variable supplier allowances often differs based on purchase volumes by supplier and product category. Changes in the Company’s sales volume (which can increase or reduce inventory purchase requirements), changes in product sales mix (especially because higher-margin products often benefit from higher supplier allowance rates), or changes in the amount of purchases UnitedEssendant makes to attain supplier allowances can create fluctuations in future results.

Customer Rebates

Customer rebates and discounts are common practice in the business products industry and have a significant impact on the Company’s overall sales and gross margin. AccruedPrepaid customer rebates were $63.2$47.9 million and $52.6$36.3 million, while accrued customer rebates were $65.3 million and $63.6 million as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

Customer rebates include volume rebates, sales growth incentives, advertising allowances, participation in promotions and other miscellaneous discount programs. Estimates for volume rebates and growth incentives are based on estimated annual sales volume to the Company’s customers. The aggregate amount of customer rebates depends on product sales mix and customer mix changes. Reported results reflect management’s current estimate of such rebates. Changes in estimates of sales volumes, product mix, customer mix or sales patterns, or actual results that vary from such estimates may impact future results.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts, which addresses the collectability of trade accounts receivable. This allowance adjusts gross trade accounts receivable downward to its estimated collectible or net realizable value. To determine the allowance for doubtful accounts, management reviews specific customer risks and the Company’s trade accounts receivable aging. Uncollectible trade receivable balances are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is determined that the trade receivable balance is uncollectible. Allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $19.7$18.2 million and $20.6$17.8 million as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1 and whenever events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate, loss of key personnel or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit. Determining whether an impairment has occurred requires valuationa comparison of the respectivecarrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit which the Company estimates using forecasted future results and a discounted cash flow method. When available and as appropriate, comparative market multiples are used to corroborate discounted cash flow results.

Prior to the completion of the annual goodwill impairment test for MBS Dev, the Company began negotiating the sale of MBS Dev with third parties and concluded that this change in strategy for MBS Dev was an interim indicator of impairment that necessitated an interim test for goodwill impairment. The Company completed a goodwill impairment test as of the date the assets were classified as held for sale, and used a market approach to determine the fair value of the MBS Devrespective reporting unit. The Company estimates fair value of the MBS Dev reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value, requiring the Company to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss by valuing the entity’s assets and liabilities at fair value and comparing the fair value of the implied goodwill to the carrying value of goodwill. Upon completion of this calculation, the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of that goodwill, resulting in a goodwill impairment of $9.0 million. The goodwill impairment was partially offset by the fair value of the consideration received for MBS Dev being in excess of the carrying value, leading to a total loss on disposition of MBS Dev of $8.2 million. The recognized and unrecognized intangible assets were valued using the cost method and return on royalty approach using estimatesdiscounted cash flows of forecasted future revenues.results, comparable public company multiples and merger and acquisition (M&A) valuations involving comparable companies.  

Intangible

Assumptions used in the discounted cash flow methodology include a discount rate, which is based upon the Company’s current weighted average cost of capital, and a projection of sales, gross margin, EBIT margin, capital expenditures and working capital for three future years and a terminal growth rate. The assumptions used for future projections are determined based upon the Company’s long-range strategic plan. These assumptions are inherently uncertain as they relate to future events and circumstances. Loss of customers due to customer consolidation or other factors, decline in demand for the products the Company sells, a shift in customer buying trends to lower margin products, a decline in supplier allowances and promotional incentives due to reductions in inventory purchases, or other events or circumstances could have a material, negative impact on future results.  

The Company determined public company multiples based on a group of comparable public companies and determined M&A valuations based on M&A transactions involving comparable companies. While the companies used in both the public company analysis and the M&A analysis are comparable, they are not identical to the Company’s reporting units and they may have exposure to customer or supplier trends or other business factors that are materially different than what the Company may experience.  

Acquired intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair market values determined on quoted market prices in active markets, if available, or recognized valuation models. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. Intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment or

17


whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company makes an annual impairment assessment of its intangibles.

As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected $398.0$297.9 million and $356.8$299.4 million of goodwill, and $112.0$83.7 million and $65.5$96.4 million in net intangible assets, respectively. As of October 1, 2016 and 2015, the percentage by which the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value is shown in the following table. As discussed above, the assumptions that were used to calculate these fair values include a degree of uncertainty.

Reporting Unit

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Office & Facilities (formerly Business & Facility Essentials)

 

 

8

%

 

 

129

%

Industrial (formerly ORS Industrial)

 

 

17

%

 

N/A

 

Automotive

 

 

9

%

 

 

10

%

CPO

 

 

11

%

 

 

77

%

Inventory Reserves

The Company also records adjustments to inventory that is obsolete, damaged, defective or slow moving. Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market. These adjustments are determined using historical trends such as age of inventory, market demands, customer commitments, and new products introduced to the market. The reserves are further adjusted, if necessary, as new information becomes available; however, based on historical experience, the Company does not believe the estimates and assumptions will have a material impact on the financial statements.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with the accounting guidance for income taxes. The Company estimates actual current tax expense and assesses temporary differences that exist due to differing treatments of items for tax and financial statement purposes. These temporary differences result in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. A provision has not been made for deferred U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as these earnings have historically been permanently invested except to the extent a liability was recorded in purchase accounting for the undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries of OKI as of the date of the acquisition.invested. It is not practicable to determine the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability for such unremitted foreign earnings. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.

Pension Benefits

To select the appropriate actuarial assumptions when determining pension benefit obligations, the Company relied on current market conditions, historical information and consultation with and input from the Company’s outside actuaries. These actuarial assumptions include discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, and rateslife expectancy of increase in compensation and healthcare costs.plan participants. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption is based on historical returns and the future expectation of returns for each asset category, as well as the target asset allocation of the asset portfolio. There was no rate of compensation increase in each of the past three fiscal years.

Pension expense for 20142016 was $3.6$17.6 million, compared to $4.5$5.4 million in 20132015 and $5.7$3.6 million in 2012. A2014. 2016 pension expense includes a settlement charge of $12.5 million related to a lump-sum offering. Refer to Item 8, Note 13 – “Pension Plans and Defined Contribution Plan” for further information. To better understand the impact of changes in pension expense based on certain circumstances the company performed a sensitivity analysis, noting that a one percentage point decrease or increase in the assumed discount rate would have resulted in an increase or decrease in pension expense for 20142016 of approximately $2.4$2.9 million and increasedincrease or decrease in the year-end projected benefit obligation by $41.1$27.4 million. Additionally, a one percentage point decrease or increase in the expected


rate of return assumption would have resulted in an increase or decrease, respectively in the net periodic benefit cost for 20142016 of approximately $1.6$1.7 million. See Item 8, Note 1113 - “Pension Plans and Defined Contribution Plan” for more information.

18


Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014

The following table presents the Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of net sales:Operations results (in thousands):

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Revenue

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Revenue

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Revenue

 

Net sales: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Janitorial, foodservice and breakroom supplies (JanSan)

$

 

1,435,476

 

 

 

26.7

%

 

$

 

1,457,993

 

 

 

27.2

%

 

$

 

1,443,242

 

 

 

27.1

%

Technology products

 

 

1,347,652

 

 

 

25.1

%

 

 

 

1,363,146

 

 

 

25.4

%

 

 

 

1,447,661

 

 

 

27.2

%

Traditional office products

 

 

860,324

 

 

 

16.0

%

 

 

 

860,024

 

 

 

16.0

%

 

 

 

861,649

 

 

 

16.2

%

Industrial supplies

 

 

560,682

 

 

 

10.4

%

 

 

 

586,580

 

 

 

10.9

%

 

 

 

601,937

 

 

 

11.3

%

Cut sheet paper

 

 

394,650

 

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

 

343,604

 

 

 

6.4

%

 

 

 

465,400

 

 

 

8.7

%

Automotive

 

 

316,546

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

 

279,966

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

 

33,709

 

 

 

0.6

%

Office furniture

 

 

298,655

 

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

 

318,870

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

 

312,203

 

 

 

5.9

%

Freight and other

 

 

155,037

 

 

 

2.9

%

 

 

 

152,863

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

 

161,404

 

 

 

3.0

%

Total net sales

 

 

5,369,022

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

5,363,046

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

5,327,205

 

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of goods sold

 

 

4,609,161

 

 

 

85.8

%

 

 

 

4,526,551

 

 

 

84.4

%

 

 

 

4,524,676

 

 

 

84.9

%

Total gross profit

$

 

759,861

 

 

 

14.2

%

 

$

 

836,495

 

 

 

15.6

%

 

$

 

802,529

 

 

 

15.1

%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses

 

 

629,825

 

 

 

11.7

%

 

 

 

675,913

 

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

 

595,673

 

 

 

11.2

%

Defined benefit plan settlement

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.0

%

Impairments of goodwill and intangible assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

129,338

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

 

9,034

 

 

 

0.2

%

Loss (gain) on disposition of business

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

1,461

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

(800

)

 

 

0.0

%

Total operating expenses

 

 

642,335

 

 

 

12.0

%

 

 

 

806,712

 

 

 

15.0

%

 

 

 

603,907

 

 

 

11.3

%

Total operating income

$

 

117,526

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

$

 

29,783

 

 

 

0.6

%

 

$

 

198,622

 

 

 

3.7

%

Interest expense

 

 

24,143

 

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

 

20,580

 

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

 

16,234

 

 

 

0.3

%

Interest income

 

 

(1,272

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

(996

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

(500

)

 

 

0.0

%

Interest expense, net

 

 

22,871

 

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

 

19,584

 

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

 

15,734

 

 

 

0.3

%

Income before income taxes

 

 

94,655

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

 

10,199

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

182,888

 

 

 

3.4

%

Income tax expense

 

 

30,803

 

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

 

54,541

 

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

 

70,773

 

 

 

1.3

%

Net income (loss)

$

 

63,852

 

 

 

1.2

%

 

$

 

(44,342

)

 

 

-0.8

%

 

$

 

112,115

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such changes include reclassification of specific products to different product categories and did not impact the Consolidated Statements of Operations. All presentations described below are based on the reclassified amounts.

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net sales

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of goods sold

 

84.8

 

 

 

84.5

 

 

 

84.8

 

Gross margin

 

15.2

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

15.2

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses

 

11.3

 

 

 

11.4

 

 

 

11.3

 

Operating income

 

3.9

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

4.0

 

Interest expense, net

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.5

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

3.6

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

3.5

 

Income tax expense

 

1.4

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.3

 

Net income

 

2.2

%

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

2.2

%


Adjusted Operating Income and Diluted Earnings Per Share

The following table presents Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except share data). The 2014 results exclude the effect of an $8.2 million loss on disposition of business. This loss was not fully recognizable for tax purposes in 2014.  The 2013 results exclude the effects of a $13.0 million charge related to workforce reductions and facility closures and a $1.2 million non-tax deductible asset impairment charge. The 2012 results exclude the effect of a $6.2 million charge related to workforce reductions and facility closures. See “Comparison of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013” and “Comparison of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012” below for more detail. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles require that the effects of these items be included in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company believes that excluding these items is an appropriate comparison of its ongoing operating results and to the results of the prior year and that it is helpful to provide readers of its financial statements with a reconciliation of these items to its Consolidated Statements of Income reported in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

% to

 

 

 

 

 

 

% to

 

 

 

 

 

 

% to

 

 

Amount

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

Amount

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

Amount

 

 

Net Sales

 

Net Sales

$

5,327,205

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

5,085,293

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

5,080,106

 

 

 

100.0

%

Gross profit

$

810,501

 

 

 

15.2

%

 

$

789,578

 

 

 

15.5

%

 

$

774,604

 

 

 

15.2

%

Operating expenses

$

600,284

 

 

 

11.3

%

 

$

580,428

 

 

 

11.4

%

 

$

573,693

 

 

 

11.3

%

Workforce reduction and facility closure charge

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(12,975

)

 

 

(0.3

%)

 

 

(6,247

)

 

 

(0.1

%)

Asset impairment charge

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,183

)

 

 

(0.0

%)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Loss on disposition of business

 

(8,234

)

 

 

(0.2

%)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Adjusted operating expenses

$

592,050

 

 

 

11.1

%

 

$

566,270

 

 

 

11.1

%

 

$

567,446

 

 

 

11.2

%

Operating income

$

210,217

 

 

 

3.9

%

 

$

209,150

 

 

 

4.1

%

 

$

200,911

 

 

 

4.0

%

Operating expense item noted above

 

8,234

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

14,158

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

6,247

 

 

 

0.1

%

Adjusted operating income

$

218,451

 

 

 

4.1

%

 

$

223,308

 

 

 

4.4

%

 

$

207,158

 

 

 

4.1

%

Net income

$

119,198

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

123,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

111,830

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expense item noted above, net of tax

 

8,234

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,227

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,873

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted net income

$

127,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

132,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

115,703

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

$

3.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.73

 

 

 

 

 

Per share operating expense item noted above

 

0.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.09

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted diluted earnings per share

$

3.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.82

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares - diluted

 

39,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,236

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,991

 

 

 

 

 

Comparison of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 20142016 were approximately $5.3$5.4 billion, a 4.8% increaseworkday adjusted 0.3% decrease from $5.1 million$5.4 billion in sales during 2013. The following table shows net2015. Net sales by key product category for 20142016 and 20132015 included the following (in thousands):

 

JanSan sales decreased $22.5 million or 1.5% in 2016 compared to 2015. Sales decreased due to a decline in sales in the independent distributor channel of $14.7 million and declines in national big-box retailer of $12.1 million, partially offset by online growth of $12.4 million. As a percentage of total sales, JanSan represented 26.7% in 2016, a decrease from the 2015 percentage of total sales of 27.2%. This decrease was the result of reduced demand principally due to declines in customer experience and competitive actions from other wholesalers.

 

Years Ended December 31

 

 

2014 (1)

 

 

2013 (1)

 

Janitorial and breakroom supplies

$

1,448,528

 

 

$

1,336,182

 

Technology products

 

1,437,721

 

 

 

1,462,756

 

Traditional office products

 

1,331,797

 

 

 

1,314,456

 

Industrial supplies

 

638,752

 

 

 

517,810

 

Office furniture

 

309,003

 

 

 

311,403

 

Freight revenue

 

121,933

 

 

 

105,567

 

Other

 

39,471

 

 

 

37,119

 

Total net sales

$

5,327,205

 

 

$

5,085,293

 


(1)

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications include changes between several product categories due to several specific products being reclassified to different categories. These changes did not impact the Consolidated Statements of Income. All percentage changes described below are based on the reclassified amounts.

 

Technology products (primarily ink and toner) sales decreased $15.5 million or 1.1% in 2016 versus 2015. Excluding our 2015 Mexican subsidiary sales of $50.1 million, which was sold in the prior year, net sales in this category increased 2.6% compared to the prior year, which was primarily driven by increases in sales in the independent dealer channel of $70.4 million partially offset by declines in sales to national big-box retailer of $38.6 million. As a percentage of total sales, technology products represented 25.1% in 2016, a decrease from the 2015 percentage of total sales of 25.4% due to the sale of our Mexican subsidiary.

19


Traditional office product sales increased $0.3 million in 2016 versus 2015. This minor increase in the category was primarily driven by the buying patterns of national big-box retailers. As a percentage of total sales, traditional office products represented 16.0% in both 2016 and 2015.

Industrial supplies sales decreased $25.9 million or 4.4%. The decline was driven by weakness in the general industrial channel and consolidation in the welding channel. Sales in the janitorialgeneral industrial and breakroom supplies product category increased 8.4%welding channels declined by $22.9 million and $21.9 million, respectively. This was partially offset by growth in 2014 compared with 2013. For the first time, this category now represents the largestretail channel of $17.8 million. As a percentage of total sales, industrial supplies represented 10.4% in 2016, a decrease from the Company’s consolidated net2015 percentage of total sales accounting for 27.2% of net10.9%.

Cut sheet paper product sales increased $51.0 million or 14.9% in 2014. Growth2016 versus 2015. The increase in this category was primarily driven by increased sales to independent dealers of janitorial and breakroom products$50.0 million. As a percentage of total sales, cut sheet paper represented 7.4% in nearly all channels as enhanced2016, which increased from the 2015 percentage of total sales of 6.4%.

Automotive product lines were launched.  Incremental sales from becoming the primary supplier to Office Depot’s janitorial business beginningincreased $36.6 million or 13.1% in 2014 accounted for 2.0% of the2016 versus 2015. The increase in sales.

Salesthis category was primarily due to the acquisition of Nestor in the technology products category decreasedprior year which contributed an additional $64.9 million in 2014 by 1.7% versus 2013. This category accounted for 27.0% of net sales in 2014. Earlythe current year as compared to $27.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 our largest product line manufacturer adopted a new distribution policy that restricts wholesalers, including the Company, to resell its products only to certain authorized resellers.  In the fourth quarter of 2014, additional restrictions in this supplier’s distribution policy went into effect, again decreasing the amount of authorized resellers for their products. This new distribution policy resulted in a decline in our sales of the manufacturer’s products.  Offsetting these declines was increased business with certain large customers and the addition of new business.

Sales of traditional office products increased in 2014 by 1.3% versus 2013. Traditional office supplies represented 25.0% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2014. Within this category, higher sales of cut-sheet paper, continued double-digit growth in sales to e-tailers, and a rebound in government spending were partially offset by the continued effects of workplace digitization which is lowering overall consumption. In addition, there were lower sales due to being named the second-call office products supplier for Office Depot’s office products’ business in 2014, after being the primary supplier of a portion of its business in prior years. We estimate this impact, net of the incremental sales from janitorial products, to be a $0.14 to $0.22 reduction in earnings per share in 2015.

Industrial supplies sales in 2014 increased 23.4% compared with the prior year. SalesAs a percentage of industrial supplies accounted for 12.0%total sales, automotive products represented 5.9% in 2016, which increased from the 2015 percentage of total sales of 5.2% due to the impact of the Company’s net sales in 2014. Sales growth in industrial supplies was largely driven by the acquisitions of CPO in May of 2014 and MEDCO in October of 2014. Organic industrial sales grew 4.7% and were driven by the Company’s Value of Wholesale (VOW) initiatives.  Additionally in 2014, the Company became the exclusive distributor for a major safety buying group.acquisition.

Office furniture sales decreased $20.2 million or 6.3% in 20142016 compared to 2015. The decreased 0.8% compared with 2013. Office furniture accounted for 5.8%revenue was primarily the result of the Company’s 2014 consolidated net sales. Sales declines in this category were driven by lower sales to national big-box retailers of $13.9 million and independent dealers of $7.8 million. As a percentage of total sales, office furniture represented 5.6% in 2016, a decrease from the independent dealer channel and certain national accounts.2015 percentage of total sales of 5.9%.

The remainder of the Company’s consolidated 20142016 net sales was composed of freight and other revenues.

Gross Profit and Gross Margin Rate. Gross profit for 20142016 was $810.5$759.9 million, compared with $789.6to $836.5 million in 2013.2015. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (the gross margin rate) of 14.2% for 20142016 was 15.2%, as compared with 15.5% for 2013. Thedown 140 basis points (bps) from the prior-year period gross margin rate of 15.6%. This decrease was favorably impacted 10 bps from our acquisitions. Excluding the acquisitions, gross margin declined due to an unfavorable product margin (11(133 bps) including, primarily driven by an unfavorable productchange in category and customerchannel mix (107 bps), and higher net freight costs (20(21 bps). Our sales to larger resellers are generally lower margins than sales to our smaller resellers. Sales to new customers tend to be lower margin but improve over time. Lower margin category sales include cut-sheet paper products and technology products, while JanSan, traditional office products, furniture and industrial supplies are higher margin categories.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses in 2014for 2016 were $600.3$642.3 million or 11.3% as a percent12.0% of sales, for the year, compared with $580.4$806.7 million or 11.4%15.0% of sales in 2013. Operatingthe same period last year. Excluding the Actions in 2016 and 2015, adjusted operating expenses were unfavorably impacted 10 bps from our acquisitions. Excluding the acquisitions,$645.4 million or 12.0% of sales in 2016 compared to $632.6 million or 11.8% of sales in 2015. The increase in adjusted operating expense decreased due a declineexpenses in variable management2016 was principally driven by the recognition of an allowance on prepaid rebates and receivables from one customer totaling $13.3 million. As of February 21, 2017, the Company has further exposure to this customer related to 2017 activity totaling approximately $18.0 million. In 2017 the Company also expects to incur incentive compensation expense, from the prior year (10 bps) and a reductionapproximately $15 million greater than in health-care expenses (5 bps) offset by approximately $4.0 million in higher costs related to the Company’s initiative to combine our office product and janitorial/breakroom platforms.2016.

Interest Expense, net. Net interest expense for 20142016 was $15.7$22.9 million or 0.4% of total sales, compared with $11.6$19.6 million or 0.4% of total sales in 2013.2015. This increase was primarily driven by the increasehigher interest rates in outstanding debt over the prior year as well as the issuance of seven-year notes in January 2014 which replaced floating rate debt with long-term fixed rate debt.2016.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $75.3$30.8 million in 2014,2016, compared with $74.3$54.5 million in 2013.2015. The Company’s effective tax rate was 38.7%32.5% and 37.6%534.8% in 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. This increasedecrease was primarily driven by the prior year Actions, particularly the 2015 noncash impairment charges for goodwill which were nondeductible for tax impact ofpurposes and the 2015 capital loss resulting from the sale of MBS DevAzerty de Mexico which could not be recognized at that time and carried a full valuation allowance. Additional favorability in 2016 is attributed to the fourth quarterreduction of 2014.valuation allowances related to the gain on the sale of the City of Industry facility. The Company’s effective tax rate excluding these Actions would have been 37.7% and 39.1% in 2016 and 2015, respectively.  

Net Income.Income (Loss). Net income for 20142016 was $119.2$63.9 million and dilutedas compared to a net loss of $44.3 million in 2015. Diluted earnings per share were $3.05,$1.73 in 2016, compared to 2013 net income of $123.2 million and diluted earningsa loss per share of $3.06. Included$1.18 in 2015. Excluding the 2014 results are the effects of an $8.2 million charge related to loss on disposition of a business. This loss was not fully recognizable for taxActions in 2014.  Included in the 2013 results are a $13.0 million pre-tax charge related to a workforce reduction2016 and facility closure program and $1.2 million non-tax deductible asset impairment


charge. Excluding these non-operating items,2015, adjusted net income for 20142016 and 2013 were $127.42015 was $57.0 million and $132.4$116.4 million, respectively. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $3.26$1.54 and $3.29$3.08 for 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.


20


Comparison of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 20132015 and 20122014

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 20132015 were approximately $5.1$5.4 billion, even with 2012 sales. The following table shows neta workday adjusted 0.7% increase from $5.3 billion in sales during 2014. Net sales by product category for 20132015 and 2012 (in thousands):2014 included the following:

 

 

Years Ended December 31

 

 

2013 (1)

 

 

2012 (1)

 

Technology products

$

1,462,756

 

 

$

1,558,568

 

Janitorial and breakroom supplies

 

1,336,182

 

 

 

1,281,806

 

Traditional office products

 

1,314,456

 

 

 

1,373,399

 

Industrial supplies

 

517,810

 

 

 

409,266

 

Office furniture

 

311,403

 

 

 

323,390

 

Freight revenue

 

105,567

 

 

 

99,319

 

Other

 

37,119

 

 

 

34,358

 

Total net sales

$

5,085,293

 

 

$

5,080,106

 

(1)

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications include changes between several product categories due to several specific products being reclassified to different categories. These changes did not impact the Consolidated Statements of Income. All percentage changes described below are based on the reclassified amounts.

Janitorial, foodservice and breakroom supplies sales increased $14.8 million or 1.0% in 2015 compared to 2014. Sales in the technology products category decreased in 2013 by 6.1% versus 2012. This category represented the largest percentage of the Company’s consolidated net sales, accounting for 28.8% of net sales of 2013. Sales declinesgrowth in this category reflected the de-emphasiswas driven by increases in national big-box retailer sales of certain low profit portions of our$24.0 million, including being named the primary supplier for a large national big-box retailer’s janitorial business, as we executed our margin improvement initiatives. Additionally, earlyand growth in the fourth quarter of 2013 our largest product line manufacturer adopted a new distribution policy that allowed wholesalers like us to re-sell its products only to certain authorized resellers. This new distribution policy resulted ininternet retailers sales, totaling $7.7 million, partially offset by lower sales of the manufacturer’s products.

Sales$9.2 million in the janitorialindependent distributor channel. JanSan products represented 27.2% of total sales in 2015, which increased from the 2014 percentage of total sales of 27.1%.

Technology products (primarily ink and breakroom supplies product category increased 4.2%toner) sales decreased $84.5 million or 5.8% in 2013 compared2015 versus 2014. Sales declined $44.7 million due to the loss of business with 2012. This category accounted for 26.3%national big-box retailers and $53.8 million due to the divestiture of the Company’s 2013 consolidated net sales. ThisMexican subsidiary. The sales decline was partially offset by growth in internet retailers, totaling $9.4 million. Technology products represented 25.4% of total sales in 2015, which decreased from the 2014 percentage of total sales of 27.2%.

Traditional office products sales decreased $1.6 million or 0.2% in 2015 versus 2014. The reduction in this category was driven by increaseda $19.0 million decrease in national big-box retailers, including loss of first call supplier status with a large national big-box retailer, partially offset by growth in internet retailers, totaling $7.0 million. As a percentage of total sales, of janitorial and breakroom products in nearly all channels as existing customers leverage the Company’s broader offerings to expand their business.

Sales of traditional office products decreasedrepresented 16.0% in 2013 by 4.3% versus 2012. Traditional office supplies represented 25.8% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2013. Within this category, ongoing workplace digitization, slow job growth, a conservative outlook by small business owners, and softer demand2015, which decreased from the government and public sector negatively impacted consumption.2014 percentage of total sales of 16.2%.

Industrial supplies sales decreased $15.4 million or 2.6% in 20132015 compared to 2014. The decline was driven by weakness in general industrial and in the energy channel. The general industrial channel was down $30.0 million and the energy channel declined $25.0 million. This was partially offset by growth in the retail channel due to the prior year acquisition of CPO of $59.2 million. Industrial supplies represented 10.9% of total sales in 2015, which decreased from the 2014 percentage of total sales of 11.3%.

Cut sheet paper products sales decreased $121.8 million or 26.2% in 2015 versus 2014. The decrease in this category was due to declines totaling $119.2 million with independent dealers. As a percentage of total sales, cut sheet paper represented 6.4% in 2015, which decreased from the 2014 percentage of total sales of 8.7%.

Automotive products sales increased 26.5% compared with$246.3 million or 730.5% in 2015 versus 2014. The increase in this category was solely driven by the acquisitions consummated in the prior year. SalesAs a percentage of industrial supplies accounted for 10.2%total sales, automotive represented 5.2% in 2015, which increased from the 2014 percentage of the Company’s nettotal sales in 2013. Sales growth in industrial supplies was largely driven by the acquisition of OKI in November of 2012.0.6%.

Office furniture sales increased $6.7 million or 2.1% in 2013 decreased 3.7%2015 compared with 2012. Officeto 2014. The increase reflects growth in internet retailers and independent dealers of $4.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively. As a percentage of total sales, office furniture accounted for 6.1% of the Company’s 2013 consolidated net sales. Sales declinesproducts remained flat at 5.9% in this category were driven by lower sales to the independent dealer channel2015 and certain national accounts.2014.

The remainder of the Company’s consolidated 20132015 net sales was composed of freight and other revenues.

Gross Profit and Gross Margin Rate. Gross profit for 20132015 was $789.6$836.5 million, compared with $774.6to $802.5 million in 2012.2014. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (the gross margin rate)of 15.6% for 20132015 was 15.5%, as compared with 15.2% for 2012. Theup 50 bps from the prior-year period gross margin rate increasedof 15.1%. This increase was due to a favorable product categorymargin (41 bps) driven by favorable product mix (14 bps) and purchase driven inventory allowances (34 bps). Acquisitions added 28 bps of gross margin improvement initiatives (70during 2015. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, product margin increased 18 bps driven by favorable purchase driven inventory allowances (42 bps), including inventory-related supplier allowances, and cost saving initiatives executed in the year. These improvements were partiallypartly offset by lowerunfavorable impacts of product cost inflation (30 bps) and increased freight costs (20mix (24 bps).

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses in 2013for 2015 were $580.4$806.7 million or 11.4% as a percent15.0% of sales, for the year, compared with $573.7$603.9 million or 11.3% of sales in 2012.the same period last year. Excluding the non-operating items previously mentioned,Actions in 2015 and an $8.2 million loss on disposition of business in 2014, adjusted operating expenses were $566.3$632.6 million or 11.1%11.8% of sales in 2013,2015 compared with $567.4to $595.7 million or 11.2% of sales in 2014. The 2015 operating expenses were affected by acquisitions which added an incremental 23 bps, partly offset by reduced expenses including a variable management compensation reduction of 21 bps. We also incurred approximately $12.0 million of operating expense related to the prior year. This favorability was driven by our restructuring taken incommon platform initiative to combine the first quarter of 2013 as well as our continued focus on cost saving initiatives.Company’s office product and janitorial platforms.

Interest Expense, net. Net interest expense for 20132015 was $11.6$19.6 million, compared with $23.3$15.7 million in 2012.2014. This declineincrease was primarily due todriven by the maturing of interest rate swaps sinceincrease in outstanding debt over the prior year.year related to our acquisitions.


21


Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $74.3$54.5 million in 2013,2015, compared with $65.8$70.8 million in 2012.2014. The Company’s effective tax rate was 37.6%534.8% and 37.0%38.7% in 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively. ThisThe increase was driven by the non-deductible assetActions, particularly the noncash impairment chargecharges for goodwill which is nondeductible for tax purposes and the capital loss resulting from the sale of Azerty de Mexico which cannot be recognized at this time and carries a reduction of incomefull valuation allowance. The Company’s 2015 effective tax valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in 2012 which did not reoccur in 2013.rate excluding these Actions would have been 39.1%.  

Net Income.Income (Loss). Net incomeloss for 20132015 was $123.2$44.3 million and diluted earnings per share were $3.06,$(1.18), compared to 20122014 net income of $111.8$112.1 million and diluted earnings per share of $2.73. Included$2.87. Excluding the Actions in the 2013 results are a $13.02015 and $8.2 million pre-tax charge related to a workforce reduction and facility closure program and $1.2 million non-tax deductible asset impairment charge. Excluding these non-operating items,on disposition of business in 2014, adjusted net income for 2013 was $132.42015 and 2014 were $116.4 million and adjusted$120.3 million, respectively. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $3.29. Included in the 2012 results is a $6.2 million pre-tax charge related to distribution network optimization$3.08 for 2015 and cost reduction program. Excluding this charge, adjusted net income was $115.7 million and adjusted diluted earnings per share were $2.82 in 2012. Earnings per share growth was driven by higher operating income and a reduction in interest expense.2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

United’s

Essendant’s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing. The Company believes that its cash from operations and collections of receivables, coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand, are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements. These requirements include payments of interest and dividends, scheduled debt repayments, capital expenditures, working capital needs, restructuring activities, the funding of pension plans, and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions, if any. Due to our credit profile over the years, external funds have been available at an acceptable cost. We believeThe Company believes that current credit arrangementsits sources of borrowings are sound and that the strength of ourits balance sheet affords us the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions.

 

The Company’s outstanding debt consisted of the following amounts (in millions):

As of

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

2013 Credit Agreement

$

363.0

 

 

$

206.8

 

$

260.4

 

 

$

368.4

 

2013 Note Purchase Agreement

 

150.0

 

 

 

-

 

 

150.0

 

 

 

150.0

 

2007 Note Purchase Agreement (1)

 

-

 

 

 

135.0

 

Receivables Securitization Program

 

200.0

 

 

 

190.7

 

 

200.0

 

 

 

200.0

 

Mortgage & Capital Lease (2)

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.2

 

Debt

 

713.9

 

 

 

533.7

 

 

610.4

 

 

 

718.4

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

856.1

 

 

 

825.5

 

 

781.1

 

 

 

723.7

 

Total capitalization

$

1,570.0

 

 

$

1,359.2

 

$

1,391.5

 

 

$

1,442.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt-to-total capitalization ratio

 

45.5

%

 

 

39.3

%

 

43.9

%

 

 

49.8

%

(1) The parties to the 2007 Note Purchase Agreement have satisfied their obligations under that agreement. The Company will not issue any new debt under the 2007 Note Purchase Agreement

(2) As part of the acquisition of OKI in 2012, the Company acquired a mortgage on the headquarters of the Canadian subsidiary. This mortgage was paid in full on January 31, 2015.

 

This increasedecrease in the debt-to-capitalization ratio at December 31, 20142016, as compared to December 31, 2015 is due to the reduction in outstanding debt resulting from partial debt repayments in the year and the effect on equity related to the acquisitionincrease in retained earnings during the year.

As discussed further in Item 8, Note 11 – “Debt” in February 2017 the Company entered into the 2017 Credit Agreement. The maximum amount the Company is able to borrow under the 2017 Credit Agreement is determined based on the value of MEDCO in the fourth quarter of 2014.


Operating cash requirements and capital expenditures are funded from operating cash flow and available financing. Financing available from debt and the sale ofCompany’s accounts receivable, as of December 31, 2014, is summarized below (in millions):inventory, owned real estate and certain equipment.

Availability

Maximum financing available under:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Credit Agreement

$

700.0

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Note Purchase Agreement

 

150.0

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables Securitization Program (3)

 

200.0

 

 

 

 

 

Maximum financing available

 

 

 

 

$

1,050.0

 

Amounts utilized:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Credit Agreement

 

363.0

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Note Purchase Agreement

 

150.0

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables Securitization Program (3)

 

200.0

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding letters of credit

 

11.1

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing utilized

 

 

 

 

 

724.1

 

Available financing, before restrictions

 

 

 

 

 

325.9

 

Restrictive covenant limitation

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

Available financing as of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

$

325.9

 

(3)

The Receivables Securitization Program provides for maximum funding available of the lesser of $200.0 million or the total amount of eligible receivables less excess concentrations and applicable reserves.

The 20132017 Credit Agreement increased the 2013 Note Purchase AgreementCompany’s borrowing capacity by increasing the aggregate lender commitments and the Amendedeliminating debt-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement (each as defined in Note 9 “Debt”amortization (“EBITDA”) covenants in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) prohibit the Company from exceeding a Leverage Ratio of 3.50 to 1.00 (4.00 to 1.00 or 3.75 to 1.00 for the first four fiscal quarters following certain acquisitions). The 2013 Credit Agreement and the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement also impose limits onAgreement. In addition, in February 2017 the Company’s ability to repurchase stockCompany terminated the Receivable Securitization Program (see Item 8, Note 11 – “Debt” for definitions of “2013 Credit Agreement”, “2013 Note Purchase Agreement” and issue dividends when“Receivables Securitization Program”).

22


Availability of financing as of the Leverage Ratio is greater than 3.00 to 1.00. The Company was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants at December 31, 2014.

The 2013closing of the 2017 Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility with an aggregate committed principal amount of $700 million. The 2013 Credit Agreement also provides for the issuance of letters of credit. The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $11.1 million under the 2013 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.in February 2017, is summarized below (in millions):

The Company believes that its operating cash flow and financing capacity, as described, provide adequate liquidity for operating the business for the foreseeable future. Refer to Note 9 “Debt” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for further descriptions of the provisions of our financing facilities.

 

Aggregated Committed Principal

 

 

Borrowing Base Limitation

 

 

Total Utilization

 

 

Net Availability

 

2017 Credit Agreement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term Loan (1)

$

77.6

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Revolving Credit Facility (2)

 

1,000.0

 

 

 

900.4

 

 

 

572.5

 

 

 

327.9

 

First-in-Last-Out ("FILO")

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

-

 

Total all Funding Sources

$

1,177.6

 

 

$

1,000.4

 

 

$

672.5

 

 

$

327.9

 

(1)

The term loan may be funded in a single funding on or prior to April 21, 2017. The proceeds from the funding are expected to be used to pay down borrowings and increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility.

(1)

The 2017 Credit Agreement provides for the issuance of letters of credit up to $25.0 million, plus up to $165.0 million to be used as collateral for obligations under the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement. Letters of credit totaling approximately $177.5 million were outstanding after the February 2017 close on the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Disclosures About Contractual Obligations

The following table aggregates all contractual obligations that affect financial condition and liquidity as of December 31, 20142016 (in millions):

 

 

Payment due by period

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment due by period

 

 

 

 

 

Contractual obligations

 

2015

 

 

2016 & 2017

 

 

2018 & 2019

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

 

2017

 

 

2018 & 2019

 

 

 

 

2020 & 2021

 

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Debt(1)

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

563

 

 

$

150

 

 

$

713

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

460

 

 

$

150

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

610

 

Fixed interest payments on long-term debt(1)

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3

 

Fixed interest payments on long term debt

 

 

7

 

 

 

11

 

 

6

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

24

 

Operating leases

 

 

50

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

274

 

Purchase obligations

 

 

5

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14

 

Acquisition related future payments

 

 

-

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14

 

Total contractual cash obligations

 

$

56

 

 

$

90

 

 

$

613

 

 

$

179

 

 

$

938

 

 

$

80

 

 

$

569

 

 

 

$

215

 

 

 

 

$

72

 

 

$

936

 

 

(1)

The Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions on a portion of its long-term debt. The fixed interest payments noteddebt that was scheduled to mature in 2018 was effectively repaid in February 2017 with borrowings under the table are based on the notional amounts and fixed rates inherent in the swap transactions and related debt instruments. For more detail see Note 17, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.2017 Credit Agreement totaling $522.5 million due 2022.


  

On December 10, 2014,In February 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a $2 million cash contributioncontributions to the Company’s pension plans. In 2017, the Company expects to make cash contributions totaling $5.0 million to the Essendant Union pension plan which was funded in January 2015.Employees’ Pension Plan and $5.0 million to the Essendant Pension Plan. Additional fundings,contributions, if any, for 20152017 have not yet been determined.

In 2016, the Company offered lump sum distributions to eligible terminated, vested participants in the Essendant Pension Plan. As a result, the Company recognized a settlement loss of $12.5 million in 2016. Refer to Item 8, Note 13 - “Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”, for further information on the remeasurement and voluntary lump sum program.

At December 31, 2014,2016, the Company had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $3.2$3.8 million as discussed in Item 8, Note 13,15 - “Income Taxes”, and an accrual for the related interest, that are excluded from the Contractual Obligations table. Due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters, the Company is unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur.

Refer to Note 9, “Debt”, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for further descriptions of the provisions of our financing facilities.

Cash Flows

Cash flows for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

77,133

 

 

$

74,737

 

 

$

189,814

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(183,633

)

 

 

(30,273

)

 

 

(107,266

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

105,968

 

 

 

(53,060

)

 

 

(63,457

)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

130,942

 

 

$

162,734

 

 

$

77,133

 

Net cash (used in) investing activities

 

(3,769

)

 

 

(67,929

)

 

 

(183,633

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(135,964

)

 

 

(84,990

)

 

 

105,968

 


Cash Flows From Operations

NetThe 2016 decline in net cash provided by operating activities for 2014 totaled $77.1 million versus $74.7 millionwas principally the result of diminished operating results in 2013. Current period operating cash flows was impacted primarilythe current year and decreased accounts payable, partially offset by the timing of higher inventory levels related to strategic inventory purchases, a decreasereductions in accounts payable,receivable and higherinventory, consistent with the Company’s desire to reduce working capital. The 2015 improvement over the 2014 was principally the result of diminished accounts receivable.receivable and increases in accounts payable.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $183.6 million, $30.3 million, and $107.3 million, respectively. Gross capital spending for 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 was $25.0$37.7 million, $33.8$28.3 million and $32.8$25.0 million, respectively, which was used for various investments in fleet equipment, information technology systems, technology hardware, and distribution center equipment including several facility projects. During the current year the Company received $33.9 million from the disposition of the City of Industry facility. Additionally, cash used in 2015 and 2014 included $40.5 million and 2012 included $161.4 million $75.3 million, respectively, for acquisitions. We expect $30.0 million to $35.0 million in capital expenditures in 2015.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

The Company’s cash flow from financing activities is largely dependent on levels of borrowing under the Company’s credit agreements, the acquisition of businesses, the acquisition or issuance of treasury stock, and quarterly dividend payments that were initiated in 2011.payments.

Net cash provided by financing activities for 2014 totaled $106.0 million, compared to net cash used in financing activities for 2013 and 2012 totaling $53.1 million, and $63.5 million, respectively. Cash outflows from financing activities in 20142016 included the repurchasepartial debt repayment of $108.1 million in 2016 as compared to a prior year net borrowing of $4.6 million, partially offset by repurchases of shares at a cost of $50.0$6.8 million andin 2016 as compared to a prior year repurchases of $68.1 million. As of December 31, 2016 there was $68.2 million remaining on the payment of cash dividends of $21.8current share repurchase authorization.

The Company paid a $0.14 per share dividend on January 15, 2017, totaling $5.1 million. In February 2015,2017, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $100.0approved a dividend of $0.14 to be paid on April 14, 2017 to shareholders of record as of March 15, 2017. In the aggregate, the Company paid dividends of $20.5 million common stock repurchase program.and $21.2 million in 2016 and 2015.

Seasonality

See the information under the heading “Seasonality” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Inflation/Deflation and Changing Prices

The Company maintains substantial inventories to accommodate the prompt service and delivery requirements of its customers. Accordingly, the Company purchases its products on a regular basis in an effort to maintain its inventory at levels that it believes are sufficient to satisfy the anticipated needs of its customers, based upon historical buying practices and market conditions. Although the Company historically has been able to pass through manufacturers’ price increases to its customers on a timely basis, competitive conditions will influence how much of future price increases can be passed on to the Company’s customers. Conversely, when


manufacturers’ prices decline, lower sales prices could result in lower margins as the Company sells existing inventory. As a result, changes in the prices paid by the Company for its products could have a material effect on the Company’s net sales, gross margins and net income.  See the information under the heading “Comparison of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013” in Part I, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further analysis on these changes in prices in 2014.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014,For information about recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Item 8, Note 2 - “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.

Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted Operating Expenses, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow (the “Non-GAAP table”)

The Non-GAAP table below presents Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted Operating Expenses, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share, Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow for the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operationstwelve months ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. This ASU modifies2014. These non-GAAP measures exclude certain non-recurring items and exclude other items that do not reflect the definition of discontinued operations by limiting discontinued operations reporting to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’sCompany’s ongoing operations and are included to provide investors with useful information about the financial results.performance of our business. The update also requires additionalpresented non-GAAP financial statement disclosures about discontinuedmeasures should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for the comparable GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures do not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP, and these non-GAAP financial measures should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP financial measures.

In order to calculate the non-GAAP measures, management excludes the following items to facilitate the comparison of current and prior year results and ongoing operations, as management believes these items do not reflect the underlying cost structure of our business. These items can vary significantly in amount and frequency.

24


Restructuring charges. Workforce reduction and facility closure charges such as employee termination costs, facility closure and consolidation costs, and other costs directly associated with shifting business strategies or business conditions that are part of a restructuring program. 

The Company commenced two such restructuring programs during 2015 and incurred adjustments of the related accruals in 2016 (refer to Note 7).

Gain or loss on sale of assets or businesses. Sales of assets, such as buildings or equipment, and businesses can cause gains or losses. These transactions occur as the Company is repositioning its business and reviewing its cost structure.

The Company recognized a gain on the sale of its City of Industry facility in the third quarter of 2016 (refer to Note 12), a loss on the sale and related impairment of intangible assets of the operations in Mexico in 2015, and a loss on the sale and related impairment of intangible assets of its software subsidiary in 2014, recording an impairment of the seller notes in the third quarter of 2015.

Due to the sale of the City of Industry facility, the Company was able to utilize its capital loss carryforwards. This utilization resulted in the release of the valuation allowance previously established against the deferred tax asset. The $4.7 million tax benefit from the release of the valuation allowance reduced the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016, by 5.0%.

Severance costs for operating leadership.  Employee termination costs related to members of the Company’s operating leadership team are excluded as they are based upon individual agreements.

Two operating leaders were severed from the Company in the third quarter of 2016, which were not part of a restructuring program.

Asset impairments.  Changes in strategy or macroeconomic events may cause asset impairments.

The Company recorded impairment and accelerated amortization of its trademarks upon the announcement of its rebranding effort in 2015. The Company recorded impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, as well as disposalan increase in reserves for obsolete inventory, based on a strategic review of an individually significant componentthe Industrial business unit in 2015.

Other actions.  Actions, which may be non-recurring events, that result from the changing strategies and needs of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation. The updated guidance is effective prospectively for years beginning on or after December 15, 2014. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company elected to early adopt this guidance. This guidance was applied inand do not reflect the analysisunderlying expense of the accounting treatmenton-going business. These charges include items such as settlement charges related to the defined benefit plan settlement in 2016 (refer to Note 13), charges related to litigation (refer to Note 18), the tax impact of the dividend from a foreign subsidiary and reserves related to prior year uncertain tax positions (refer to Item 8, Note 15 – “Income Taxes”) in 2016.

Adjusted gross profit, adjusted operating expenses and adjusted operating income. Adjusted gross profit, adjusted operating expenses and adjusted operating income provide management and our investors with an understanding of the results from the primary operations of our fourth quarter 2014 divestiturebusiness by excluding the effects of MBS Dev.items described above that do not reflect the ordinary expenses and earnings of our operations. Adjusted operating expenses and adjusted operating income are used to evaluate our period-over-period operating performance as they are more comparable measures of our continuing business. These measures may be useful to an investor in evaluating the underlying operating performance of our business.

In May 2014,

Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share. Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share provide a more comparable view of our Company’s underlying performance and trends than the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers, that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customerscomparable GAAP measures. Net income and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The ASU is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approachdiluted earnings per share are adjusted for the adoptioneffect of items described above that do not reflect the new standard. This standardordinary earnings of our operations.

Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Adjusted EBITDA is effectivehelpful in evaluating our operating performance and is used by management for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016,various purposes, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period. The standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a measure of performance condition, and as a basis for strategic planning and forecasting. Net income is adjusted for the effect of interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation cost should be recognizedexpense. Management believes that adjusted EBITDA is also commonly used by investors to evaluate operating performance between competitors because it helps reduce variability caused by differences in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. This ASUcapital structures, income taxes, stock-based compensation accounting policies, and depreciation and amortization policies.  

Free cash flow. Free cash flow is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015,useful to management and for interim periods within those fiscal years. This new standard will not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsour investors as it is in alignment witha measure of the Company’s current accounting policies for equity based compensation.liquidity. It provides a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our cash flows than the comparable GAAP measure. Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities and net cash provided by (used in) investing activities are aggregated and adjusted to exclude acquisitions, net of cash acquired and divestitures.

25


 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

$

759,861

 

 

$

836,495

 

 

$

802,529

 

Industrial inventory obsolescence reserve

 

-

 

 

 

4,887

 

 

 

-

 

Adjusted Gross Profit

$

759,861

 

 

$

841,382

 

 

$

802,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

$

642,335

 

 

$

806,712

 

 

$

603,907

 

Gain on sale of City of Industry facility (Note 12)

 

20,541

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Settlement charge related to the defined benefit plan (Note 13)

 

(12,510

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Litigation reserve (Note 18)

 

(4,000

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Severance costs for operating leadership

 

(1,245

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

State income tax reserve adjustment

 

(642

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Impairment of Industrial goodwill and intangible assets

 

-

 

 

 

(115,825

)

 

 

-

 

Restructuring charges (Note 7)

 

956

 

 

 

(18,575

)

 

 

-

 

Loss on disposition of business and related costs

 

-

 

 

 

(16,999

)

 

 

(8,234

)

Impairment of assets and accelerated amortization related to rebranding

 

-

 

 

 

(11,981

)

 

 

-

 

Impairment of seller notes

 

-

 

 

 

(10,738

)

 

 

-

 

Adjusted operating expenses

$

645,435

 

 

$

632,594

 

 

$

595,673

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

$

117,526

 

 

$

29,783

 

 

$

198,622

 

Gross profit and operating expense adjustments noted above

 

(3,100

)

 

 

179,005

 

 

 

8,234

 

Adjusted operating income

$

114,426

 

 

$

208,788

 

 

$

206,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

Gross profit and operating expense adjustments noted above

 

(3,100

)

 

 

179,005

 

 

 

8,234

 

Non-GAAP tax provision on adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of City of Industry facility (Note 12)

 

1,138

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Settlement charge related to the defined benefit plan (Note 13)

 

(4,705

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Litigation reserve (Note 18)

 

(1,508

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Dividend from a foreign subsidiary

 

1,666

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Severance costs for operating leadership

 

(469

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

State income tax reserve adjustment

 

(225

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Impairment of Industrial goodwill and intangible assets

 

-

 

 

 

(2,636

)

 

 

-

 

Restructuring charges (Note 7)

 

357

 

 

 

(7,059

)

 

 

-

 

Loss on sale of business and related costs

 

-

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

-

 

Impairment of assets and accelerated amortization related to rebranding

 

-

 

 

 

(4,552

)

 

 

-

 

Impairment of seller notes

 

-

 

 

 

(4,080

)

 

 

-

 

Adjusted net income

$

57,006

 

 

$

116,385

 

 

$

120,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share (1)

$

1.73

 

 

$

(1.17

)

 

$

2.87

 

Per share gross profit and operating expense adjustments noted above

 

(0.08

)

 

 

4.78

 

 

 

0.21

 

Non-GAAP tax provision on adjustments

 

(0.11

)

 

 

(0.53

)

 

 

0.00

 

Adjusted diluted net income per share

$

1.54

 

 

$

3.08

 

 

$

3.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

Provision for income taxes

 

30,803

 

 

 

54,541

 

 

 

70,773

 

Interest expense, net

 

22,871

 

 

 

19,584

 

 

 

15,734

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

40,671

 

 

 

41,917

 

 

 

36,227

 

Equity compensation expense

 

10,202

 

 

 

7,895

 

 

 

8,195

 

Gross profit and operating expense adjustments noted above

 

(3,100

)

 

 

179,005

 

 

 

8,234

 

Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)

$

165,299

 

 

$

258,600

 

 

$

251,278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

130,942

 

 

$

162,734

 

 

$

77,133

 

Less: Net cash used in investing activities

 

(3,769

)

 

 

(67,929

)

 

 

(183,633

)

Add: Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

-

 

 

 

40,515

 

 

 

161,406

 

Less: Sale of equity investment

 

-

 

 

 

(612

)

 

 

-

 

Free cash flow

$

127,173

 

 

$

134,708

 

 

$

54,906

 

ITEM

(1)

Diluted earnings per share for 2015 under GAAP reflect an adjustment to the basic earnings per share due to the net loss. The diluted earnings per share shown here does not reflect this adjustment.

26


ITEM  7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The Company is subject to market risk associated principally with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is principally limited to the Company’s outstanding debt at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 of $713.9$609.0 million and $533.7$716.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Company had $563.0$460.4 and $532.5$568.4 million of outstanding debt with interest based on variable market rates. See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, and Note 17, “Derivative Financial Instruments”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the overall weighted average effective borrowing rate, excluding the impact of commitment fees, of the Company’s debt was 1.9%2.5% and 1.3%2.2%, respectively. A 50 basis point movement in interest rates, would result in a $2.1$1.5 million increase or decrease in annualized interest expense, on a pre-tax basis, and upon cash flows from operations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The Company’s foreign currency exchange rate risk is limited principally to the Mexican Peso, the Canadian Dollar and the Arab Emirate Dirham as well as product purchases from Asian countries valued and paiddue to its operations in U.S. Dollars.those countries. Many of the products the Company sells in Mexico and Canadathose countries are purchased in U.S. dollars, while the sale is invoiced in the local currency. The Company’s foreign currency exchange rate risk is not material to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. TheHowever, the Company has not previously hedged these transactions, but it maydoes enter into hedging transactions inforeign currency forward contracts from time to time to hedge the future.exposure to the Canadian Dollar.  

 



27


ITEMITEM  8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act to mean a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20142016 in relation to the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of elements such as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies and the Company’s overall control environment. That assessment was supported by testing and monitoring performed both by the Company’s Internal Audit organization and its Finance organization.

Based on that assessment, management concluded that as of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who audited and reported on the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as stated in their report which appears on page 2729 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

28



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of United StationersEssendant Inc.

We have audited United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying report, Management Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2016, and our report dated February 17, 2015,27, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 17, 201527, 2017

 

 

 


29


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of United StationersEssendant Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), United StationersEssendant Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 17, 201527, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 17, 201527, 2017

 

 

 


UNITED STATIONERS

30


ESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF INCOMEOPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

For the Years Ended December 31

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014 (Revised)*

 

Net sales

$

5,327,205

 

 

$

5,085,293

 

 

$

5,080,106

 

$

5,369,022

 

 

$

5,363,046

 

 

$

5,327,205

 

Cost of goods sold

 

4,516,704

 

 

 

4,295,715

 

 

 

4,305,502

 

 

4,609,161

��

 

 

4,526,551

 

 

 

4,524,676

 

Gross profit

 

810,501

 

 

 

789,578

 

 

 

774,604

 

 

759,861

 

 

 

836,495

 

 

 

802,529

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses

 

592,050

 

 

 

580,428

 

 

 

573,693

 

 

629,825

 

 

 

675,913

 

 

 

595,673

 

Loss on disposition of business

 

8,234

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Defined benefit plan settlement loss

 

12,510

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Impairments of goodwill and intangible assets

 

-

 

 

 

129,338

 

 

 

9,034

 

Loss (gain) on disposition of business

 

-

 

 

 

1,461

 

 

 

(800

)

Operating income

 

210,217

 

 

 

209,150

 

 

 

200,911

 

 

117,526

 

 

 

29,783

 

 

 

198,622

 

Interest expense

 

16,234

 

 

 

12,233

 

 

 

23,619

 

 

24,143

 

 

 

20,580

 

 

 

16,234

 

Interest income

 

(500

)

 

 

(593

)

 

 

(343

)

 

(1,272

)

 

 

(996

)

 

 

(500

)

Income before income taxes

 

194,483

 

 

 

197,510

 

 

 

177,635

 

 

94,655

 

 

 

10,199

 

 

 

182,888

 

Income tax expense

 

75,285

 

 

 

74,340

 

 

 

65,805

 

 

30,803

 

 

 

54,541

 

 

 

70,773

 

Net income

$

119,198

 

 

$

123,170

 

 

$

111,830

 

Net income per share - basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share - basic

$

3.08

 

 

$

3.11

 

 

$

2.77

 

Net income (loss)

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

Net income (loss) per share - basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share - basic

$

1.75

 

 

$

(1.18

)

 

$

2.90

 

Average number of common shares outstanding - basic

 

38,705

 

 

 

39,650

 

 

 

40,337

 

 

36,580

 

 

 

37,457

 

 

 

38,705

 

Net income per share - diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share - diluted

$

3.05

 

 

$

3.06

 

 

$

2.73

 

Net income (loss) per share - diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share - diluted

$

1.73

 

 

$

(1.18

)

 

$

2.87

 

Average number of common shares outstanding - diluted

 

39,130

 

 

 

40,236

 

 

 

40,991

 

 

36,918

 

 

 

37,457

 

 

 

39,130

 

Dividends declared per share

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.56

 

* Revised in 2015 for the impact of the changes in accounting principle related to inventory accounting.

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 


UNITED STATIONERS31


ESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net income

 

$

119,198

 

 

$

123,170

 

 

$

111,830

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Unrealized translation adjustment

 

 

(5,262

)

 

 

(901

)

 

 

1,567

 

       Minimum pension liability adjustments

 

 

(17,044

)

 

 

13,194

 

 

 

(4,645

)

       Unrealized interest rate swap adjustments

 

 

(597

)

 

 

1,584

 

 

 

5,719

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

(22,903

)

 

 

13,877

 

 

 

2,641

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

96,295

 

 

$

137,047

 

 

$

114,471

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014 (Revised)*

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Translation adjustments

 

 

1,427

 

 

 

(9,075

)

 

 

(5,262

)

       Translation loss realized through disposition of business

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,132

 

 

 

-

 

       Minimum pension liability adjustments

 

 

9,682

 

 

 

3,271

 

 

 

(17,044

)

       Cash flow hedge adjustments

 

 

26

 

 

 

(128

)

 

 

(597

)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

11,135

 

 

 

5,200

 

 

 

(22,903

)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

74,987

 

 

$

(39,142

)

 

$

89,212

 

* Revised in 2015 for the impact of the changes in accounting principle related to inventory accounting.

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 


UNITED STATIONERS32


ESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of  December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

20,812

 

 

$

22,326

 

$

21,329

 

 

$

29,983

 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $19,725 in 2014 and $20,608 in 2013

 

702,527

 

 

 

643,379

 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $18,196 in 2016 and $17,810 in 2015

 

678,184

 

 

 

716,537

 

Inventories

 

926,809

 

 

 

830,295

 

 

876,837

 

 

 

922,162

 

Other current assets

 

30,042

 

 

 

29,255

 

 

32,100

 

 

 

27,310

 

Total current assets

 

1,680,190

 

 

 

1,525,255

 

 

1,608,450

 

 

 

1,695,992

 

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

13,105

 

 

 

13,185

 

 

6,634

 

 

 

12,968

 

Buildings

 

62,370

 

 

 

62,235

 

 

50,622

 

 

 

61,777

 

Fixtures and equipment

 

331,163

 

 

 

318,013

 

 

353,362

 

 

 

342,339

 

Leasehold improvements

 

29,841

 

 

 

28,860

 

 

37,147

 

 

 

31,082

 

Capitalized software costs

 

91,624

 

 

 

83,026

 

 

97,010

 

 

 

98,873

 

Total property, plant and equipment

 

528,103

 

 

 

505,319

 

 

544,775

 

 

 

547,039

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

389,886

 

 

 

362,269

 

 

416,524

 

 

 

413,288

 

Net property, plant equipment

 

138,217

 

 

 

143,050

 

 

128,251

 

 

 

133,751

 

Intangible assets, net

 

111,958

 

 

 

65,502

 

 

83,690

 

 

 

96,413

 

Goodwill

 

398,042

 

 

 

356,811

 

 

297,906

 

 

 

299,355

 

Other long-term assets

 

41,810

 

 

 

25,576

 

 

45,209

 

 

 

37,348

 

Total assets

$

2,370,217

 

 

$

2,116,194

 

$

2,163,506

 

 

$

2,262,859

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

$

485,241

 

 

$

476,113

 

$

484,602

 

 

$

531,949

 

Accrued liabilities

 

192,792

 

 

 

191,531

 

 

197,804

 

 

 

177,472

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

851

 

 

 

373

 

 

28

 

 

 

51

 

Total current liabilities

 

678,884

 

 

 

668,017

 

 

682,434

 

 

 

709,472

 

Deferred income taxes

 

17,763

 

 

 

29,552

 

 

6,378

 

 

 

11,901

 

Long-term debt

 

713,058

 

 

 

533,324

 

 

608,941

 

 

 

716,264

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

104,394

 

 

 

59,787

 

 

84,647

 

 

 

101,488

 

Total liabilities

 

1,514,099

 

 

 

1,290,680

 

 

1,382,400

 

 

 

1,539,125

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.10 par value; authorized - 100,000,000 shares, issued - 74,435,628 shares in 2014 and 2013

 

7,444

 

 

 

7,444

 

Common stock, $0.10 par value; authorized - 100,000,000 shares, issued - 74,435,628 shares in 2016 and 2015

 

7,444

 

 

 

7,444

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

412,291

 

 

 

411,954

 

 

409,805

 

 

 

410,927

 

Treasury stock, at cost – 35,719,041 shares in 2014 and 34,714,083 shares in 2013

 

(1,042,501

)

 

 

(998,234

)

Treasury stock, at cost – 36,951,522 shares in 2016 and 37,178,394 shares in 2015

 

(1,096,744

)

 

 

(1,100,867

)

Retained earnings

 

1,541,675

 

 

 

1,444,238

 

 

1,507,057

 

 

 

1,463,821

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(62,791

)

 

 

(39,888

)

 

(46,456

)

 

 

(57,591

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

856,118

 

 

 

825,514

 

 

781,106

 

 

 

723,734

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

2,370,217

 

 

$

2,116,194

 

$

2,163,506

 

 

$

2,262,859

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

33



UNITED STATIONERSESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

Other

 

 

Retained

 

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

(Revised)*

 

 

(Revised)*

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

$

7,444

 

 

 

(34,714,083

)

 

$

(998,234

)

 

$

411,954

 

 

$

(39,888

)

 

$

1,438,870

 

 

$

820,146

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

112,115

 

 

 

112,115

 

Unrealized translation adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(5,262

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(5,262

)

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax expense of $10,853

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(17,044

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(17,044

)

Unrealized benefit on interest rate swaps, net of tax expense of $380

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(597

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(597

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(22,903

)

 

 

112,115

 

 

 

89,212

 

Cash dividend declared, $0.56 per share

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(21,761

)

 

 

(21,761

)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,255,705

)

 

 

(50,591

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(50,591

)

Stock compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

250,747

 

 

 

6,324

 

 

 

337

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,661

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

$

7,444

 

 

 

(35,719,041

)

 

$

(1,042,501

)

 

$

412,291

 

 

$

(62,791

)

 

$

1,529,224

 

 

$

843,667

 

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(44,342

)

 

 

(44,342

)

Unrealized translation adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(9,075

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(9,075

)

Translation loss realized through disposition of business

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,132

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,132

 

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax expense of $2,071

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,271

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,271

 

Unrealized loss on cashflow hedges, net of tax benefit of $135

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(128

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(128

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,200

 

 

 

(44,342

)

 

 

(39,142

)

Cash dividend declared, $0.56 per share

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(21,061

)

 

 

(21,061

)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,822,227

)

 

 

(67,446

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(67,446

)

Stock compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

362,874

 

 

 

9,080

 

 

 

(1,364

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,716

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

$

7,444

 

 

 

(37,178,394

)

 

$

(1,100,867

)

 

$

410,927

 

 

$

(57,591

)

 

$

1,463,821

 

 

$

723,734

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

63,852

 

 

 

63,852

 

Unrealized translation adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,427

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,427

 

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax expense of $6,135

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,682

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,682

 

Unrealized gain on cashflow hedges, net of tax expense of $52

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

26

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,135

 

 

 

63,852

 

 

 

74,987

 

Cash dividend declared, $0.56 per share

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(20,616

)

 

 

(20,616

)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(241,270

)

 

 

(6,839

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(6,839

)

Stock compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

468,142

 

 

 

10,962

 

 

 

(1,122

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,840

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

$

7,444

 

 

 

(36,951,522

)

 

$

(1,096,744

)

 

$

409,805

 

 

$

(46,456

)

 

$

1,507,057

 

 

$

781,106

 

* Revised in 2015 for the impact of the changes in accounting principle related to inventory accounting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Equity

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

 

7,444

 

 

 

(32,281,847

)

 

 

(908,667

)

 

 

409,190

 

 

 

(56,406

)

 

 

1,253,118

 

 

 

704,679

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

111,830

 

 

 

111,830

 

Unrealized translation adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,567

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,567

 

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax benefit of $2,847

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,645

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,645

)

Unrealized benefit on interest rate swaps, net of tax loss of $3,505

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,719

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,719

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,641

 

 

 

111,830

 

 

 

114,471

 

Cash dividend declared, $0.53 per share

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(21,511

)

 

 

(21,511

)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,454,037

)

 

 

(69,908

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(69,908

)

Stock compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

619,664

 

 

 

15,355

 

 

 

(4,994

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,361

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

 

7,444

 

 

 

(34,116,220

)

 

 

(963,220

)

 

 

404,196

 

 

 

(53,765

)

 

 

1,343,437

 

 

 

738,092

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

123,170

 

 

 

123,170

 

Unrealized translation adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(901

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(901

)

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax loss of $8,397

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

13,194

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

13,194

 

Unrealized benefit on interest rate swaps, net of tax loss of $1,008

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,584

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,584

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

13,877

 

 

 

123,170

 

 

 

137,047

 

Cash dividend declared, $0.56 per share

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(22,369

)

 

 

(22,369

)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,684,365

)

 

 

(62,056

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(62,056

)

Stock compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,086,502

 

 

 

27,042

 

 

 

7,758

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

34,800

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

 

7,444

 

 

 

(34,714,083

)

 

 

(998,234

)

 

 

411,954

 

 

 

(39,888

)

 

 

1,444,238

 

 

 

825,514

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

119,198

 

 

 

119,198

 

Unrealized translation adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(5,262

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(5,262

)

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax benefit of $10,853

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(17,044

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(17,044

)

Unrealized benefit on interest rate swaps, net of tax loss of $380

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(597

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(597

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(22,903

)

 

 

119,198

 

 

 

96,295

 

Cash dividend declared, $0.56 per share

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(21,761

)

 

 

(21,761

)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,255,705

)

 

 

(50,591

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(50,591

)

Stock compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

250,747

 

 

 

6,324

 

 

 

337

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,661

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

74,435,628

 

 

 

7,444

 

 

 

(35,719,041

)

 

 

(1,042,501

)

 

 

412,291

 

 

 

(62,791

)

 

 

1,541,675

 

 

 

856,118

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

34



UNITED STATIONERSESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014 (Revised)*

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

33,289

 

 

 

33,532

 

 

 

32,381

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

12,238

 

 

 

15,143

 

 

 

8,623

 

Share-based compensation

 

10,202

 

 

 

7,895

 

 

 

8,195

 

(Gain) loss on the disposition of property, plant and equipment

 

(20,965

)

 

 

1,959

 

 

 

1,155

 

Amortization of capitalized financing costs

 

681

 

 

 

875

 

 

 

859

 

Excess tax cost (benefit) related to share-based compensation

 

1,034

 

 

 

(479

)

 

 

(1,214

)

Loss on disposition of business

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8,234

 

Loss on sale of equity investment

 

-

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

-

 

Asset impairment charge

 

-

 

 

 

155,603

 

 

 

-

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(10,624

)

 

 

(23,162

)

 

 

(10,879

)

Pension settlement charge

 

12,510

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable, net

 

38,499

 

 

 

(9,986

)

 

 

(16,529

)

Decrease (increase) in inventory

 

47,148

 

 

 

(12,467

)

 

 

(18,724

)

Increase in other assets

 

(12,631

)

 

 

(5,313

)

 

 

(2,898

)

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable

 

(47,262

)

 

 

41,329

 

 

 

(40,725

)

Increase in accrued liabilities

 

17,534

 

 

 

1,077

 

 

 

1,276

 

(Decrease) increase in other liabilities

 

(14,563

)

 

 

1,037

 

 

 

(4,736

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

130,942

 

 

 

162,734

 

 

 

77,133

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(37,709

)

 

 

(28,325

)

 

 

(24,994

)

Proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment

 

33,940

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

2,767

 

Proceeds from the disposition of a subsidiary

 

-

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

-

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

-

 

 

 

(40,515

)

 

 

(161,406

)

Sale of equity investment

 

-

 

 

 

612

 

 

 

-

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(3,769

)

 

 

(67,929

)

 

 

(183,633

)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (repayment) borrowings under revolving credit facility

 

(108,052

)

 

 

4,577

 

 

 

155,911

 

Borrowings under Receivables Securitization Program

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,300

 

Repayment of debt

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(135,000

)

Proceeds from the issuance of debt

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

150,000

 

Net proceeds (disbursements) from share-based compensation arrangements

 

554

 

 

 

(770

)

 

 

(2,863

)

Acquisition of treasury stock, at cost

 

(6,839

)

 

 

(68,055

)

 

 

(49,982

)

Payment of cash dividends

 

(20,487

)

 

 

(21,185

)

 

 

(21,789

)

Excess tax (cost) benefits related to share-based compensation

 

(1,034

)

 

 

479

 

 

 

1,214

 

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

(106

)

 

 

(36

)

 

 

(823

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(135,964

)

 

 

(84,990

)

 

 

105,968

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

137

 

 

 

(644

)

 

 

(982

)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(8,654

)

 

 

9,171

 

 

 

(1,514

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

29,983

 

 

 

20,812

 

 

 

22,326

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$

21,329

 

 

$

29,983

 

 

$

20,812

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Paid During the Year For:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

22,901

 

 

 

19,275

 

 

 

12,822

 

Income tax payments, net

 

32,151

 

 

 

76,330

 

 

 

76,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

119,198

 

 

$

123,170

 

 

$

111,830

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

32,381

 

 

 

32,153

 

 

 

29,994

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

8,623

 

 

 

6,985

 

 

 

6,083

 

Share-based compensation

 

8,195

 

 

 

10,808

 

 

 

8,746

 

Loss (gain) on the disposition of property, plant and equipment

 

1,155

 

 

 

(57

)

 

 

122

 

Amortization of capitalized financing costs

 

859

 

 

 

1,021

 

 

 

995

 

Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation

 

(1,214

)

 

 

(3,977

)

 

 

(648

)

Loss on disposition of business

 

8,234

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Asset impairment charge

 

-

 

 

 

1,183

 

 

 

-

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(6,367

)

 

 

(3,921

)

 

 

(6,713

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net

 

(16,529

)

 

 

14,735

 

 

 

21,820

 

(Increase) decrease  in inventory

 

(30,319

)

 

 

(66,627

)

 

 

10,374

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

(2,898

)

 

 

(4,224

)

 

 

21,105

 

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable

 

(42,093

)

 

 

(40,634

)

 

 

16,264

 

Increase (decrease) in checks in-transit

 

1,368

 

 

 

21,348

 

 

 

(32,008

)

Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities

 

1,276

 

 

 

(3,648

)

 

 

276

 

(Decrease) increase in other liabilities

 

(4,736

)

 

 

(13,578

)

 

 

1,574

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

77,133

 

 

 

74,737

 

 

 

189,814

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(24,994

)

 

 

(33,789

)

 

 

(32,787

)

Proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment

 

2,767

 

 

 

3,516

 

 

 

775

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

(161,406

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(75,254

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(183,633

)

 

 

(30,273

)

 

 

(107,266

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving credit facility

 

155,911

 

 

 

(31,378

)

 

 

(123,633

)

Borrowings under Receivables Securitization Program

 

9,300

 

 

 

40,700

 

 

 

150,000

 

Repayment of debt

 

(135,000

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Proceeds from the issuance of debt

 

150,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Net (disbursements) proceeds from share-based compensation arrangements

 

(2,863

)

 

 

19,895

 

 

 

864

 

Acquisition of treasury stock, at cost

 

(49,982

)

 

 

(62,056

)

 

 

(69,908

)

Payment of cash dividends

 

(21,789

)

 

 

(22,309

)

 

 

(21,285

)

Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation

 

1,214

 

 

 

3,977

 

 

 

648

 

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

(823

)

 

 

(1,889

)

 

 

(143

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

105,968

 

 

 

(53,060

)

 

 

(63,457

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(982

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

45

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,514

)

 

 

(8,593

)

 

 

19,136

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

22,326

 

 

 

30,919

 

 

 

11,783

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$

20,812

 

 

$

22,326

 

 

$

30,919

 

* Revised in 2015 for the impact of the changes in accounting principle related to inventory accounting.

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

35



UNITED STATIONERSESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements represent United StationersEssendant Inc. (“USI”ESND”) with its wholly owned subsidiary United Stationers SupplyEssendant Co. (“USSC”ECO”), and USSC’sECO’s subsidiaries (collectively, “United”“Essendant” or the “Company”). The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and include the accounts of USIESND and its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company operates in a single reportable segment as a leading national wholesale distributor of workplace essentials,items, with net sales of approximately $5.3$5.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016. The Company stocks over 160,000provides access to approximately 190,000 items on a national basis from over 1,600 manufacturers.basis. These items include a broad spectrum of janitorial, foodservice and breakroom supplies, technology products, traditional office products, industrial supplies, cut sheet paper products, automotive products and office furniture, janitorial and breakroom supplies, and industrial supplies.furniture. The Company sells its products through a national distribution network of 7770 distribution centers to its approximately 30,00029,000 reseller customers, who in turn sell directly to end-consumers. The Company’s customers include independent office productsand workplace dealers; contract stationers; office products superstores; computer products resellers; office furniture dealers; mass merchandisers; mail order companies; sanitary supply, paperfacilities and foodservicemaintenance distributors; drugtechnology, military, automotive aftermarket, national big-box retailers and grocery store chains; healthcare distributors; e-commerce merchants; oil field, welding supply and industrial/MRO distributors; aftermarket automotive supplyvertical suppliers; industrial distributors and retailers; other independent distributors and end consumers.internet retailers. Many resellers have online capabilities. The Company also operates as an onlineinternet retailer which sells direct to end consumers.

Acquisition of O.K.I. Supply Co.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, USSC completed the acquisition of all of the capital stock of O.K.I. Supply Co. (OKI), a welding, safety and industrial products wholesaler. This acquisition was completed at a purchase price of $90.0 million. The purchase price included a $4.5 million indemnification reserve, which was paid in the fourth quarter of 2014. In total, the purchase price, net of cash acquired, was $79.8 million. The acquisition extends the Company’s position as the leading pure-wholesale industrial distributor in the United States and brings expanded categories and services to customers. The purchase was financed through the Company’s existing debt agreements.

OKI contributed $20.5 million to the Company’s 2012 net financial sales after its acquisition on November 1, 2012. Had the OKI acquisition been completed as of the beginning of 2012, the Company’s unaudited pro forma net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 would have been $5.2 billion and unaudited pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2012 would have been $112.6 million.

Acquisition of CPO Commerce, Inc.

On May 30, 2014, USSC completed the acquisition of CPO, a leading online retailer of brand name power tools and equipment. The acquisition of CPO significantly expanded the Company’s digital resources and capabilities to support resellers as they transition to an increasingly online environment. CPO’s expertise will strength United’s ability to offer features like improved product content, real-time access to inventory and pricing, digital marketing and merchandising, and an enhanced digital platform to our manufacturing partners.

The purchase price was $37.4 million, including $5.1 million related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration which is based upon the achievement of certain sales targets during a three-year period immediately following the acquisition date. The final payments related to the contingent consideration will be determined by actual achievement in the earn-out periods and will be between zero and $10 million. Any changes to the estimated fair value after the original purchase accounting is completed will be recorded in “warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses” in the period in which a change occurs. The Company financed the 100% stock acquisition with borrowings under the Company’s available committed bank facilities.

The Company has developed a preliminary estimate of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for purposes of allocating the purchase price. This estimate is subject to change as the valuation activities are completed. The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired were estimated using various valuation methods including estimated selling price, a market approach, and discounted cash flows using both an income and cost approach.


At December 31, 2014, the preliminary allocation of the purchase price is as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Purchase Price, net of cash acquired…………………..

 

 

 

 

$

31,825

 

Preliminary Allocation of Purchase Price:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable……………………………………

$

(2,658

)

 

 

 

 

Inventories……………………………………………..

 

(13,051

)

 

 

 

 

Other current assets…………………………………….

 

(307

)

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment…………………………

 

(488

)

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets………………………………………..

 

(12,800

)

 

 

 

 

Total assets acquired……………………………….

 

 

 

 

 

(29,304

)

Trade accounts payable………………………………..

 

17,124

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities……………………………………..

 

2,130

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred taxes…………………………………………

 

3,282

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities…………………………….

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed……………………………

 

 

 

 

 

22,587

 

Goodwill………………………………………………

 

 

 

 

$

25,108

 

The purchased identifiable intangible assets are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Total

 

 

Estimated Life

Customer relationships

$

5,200

 

 

3 years

Trademark

 

7,600

 

 

15 years

     Total

$

12,800

 

 

 

Any changes to the preliminary allocation of the purchase price, some of which may be material, will be allocated to residual goodwill.

The impact of CPO on the Company’s 2014 net financial sales was immaterial. Had the CPO acquisition been completed as of the beginning of 2012, the Company’s unaudited pro forma net sales and net income for the twelve-month periods ending December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 would not have been materially impacted.

Acquisition of MEDCO

On October 31, 2014, USSC completed the acquisition of all of the capital stock of Liberty Bell Equipment Corp., a United States wholesaler of automotive aftermarket tools and equipment, and its affiliates (collectively, MEDCO) including G2S Equipment de Fabrication et d’Entretien ULC, a Canadian wholesaler. MEDCO advances a key pillar of the Company’s strategy, diversification into higher growth and margin channels and categories. It also brings expanded categories and services to customers.

The purchase price was $150.0 million, including $4.8 million related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration which is based upon the achievements of certain sales and EBITDA targets over the next three years as well as $6.0 million reserved as a payable upon completion of an eighteen month indemnification period. The final payments related to the contingent consideration will be determined by actual achievement in the earn-out periods and will be between zero and $10 million. Any changes to the estimated fair value after the original purchase accounting is completed will be recorded in “warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses” in the period in which a change occurs. This acquisition was funded through a combination of cash on hand and cash available under the Company’s committed bank facility.

The Company has developed a preliminary estimate of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for purposes of allocating the purchase price. The estimate is subject to change as the valuation activities are completed. The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired were estimated using various valuation methods including estimated selling price, a market approach, and discounted cash flows using both an income and cost approach.


At December 31, 2014, the preliminary allocation of the purchase price is as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Purchase Price, net of cash acquired…………………..

 

 

 

 

$

145,471

 

Preliminary Allocation of Purchase Price:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable……………………………………

$

(44,732

)

 

 

 

 

Inventories……………………………………………..

 

(54,656

)

 

 

 

 

Other current assets…………………………………….

 

(1,299

)

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment…………………………

 

(4,408

)

 

 

 

 

Deferred Income tax assets…………………………….

 

(1,615

)

 

 

 

 

Other assets……………………………………………..

 

(442

)

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets………………………………………..

 

(44,070

)

 

 

 

 

Total assets acquired……………………………….

 

 

 

 

 

(151,222

)

Trade accounts payable………………………………..

 

32,383

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities……………………………………..

 

3,830

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities…………………………….

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed……………………………

 

 

 

 

 

36,265

 

Goodwill………………………………………………

 

 

 

 

$

30,514

 

The purchased identifiable intangible assets are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Total

 

 

Estimated Life

Customer relationships

$

40,030

 

 

4-15 years

Trademarks

 

4,040

 

 

3-15 years

     Total

$

44,070

 

 

 

Any changes to the preliminary allocation of the purchase price, some of which may be material, will be allocated to residual goodwill.

MEDCO contributed $36.3 million to the Company’s 2014 net sales after its acquisition on October 31, 2014. Had the MEDCO acquisition been completed as of the beginning of 2012, the Company’s unaudited pro forma net sales for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 would have been $5.5 billion, $5.3 billion, and $5.3 billion respectively and the Company’s unaudited pro forma net income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 would have been $125.0 million, $129.0 million, and $119.2 million, respectively.

Divestiture of MBS Dev, Inc.

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company completed the sale of MBS Dev, Inc. (“MBS Dev”), a software solutions provider to business products resellers which the Company had acquired in the first quarter of 2010. In conjunction with the sale, United recognized a loss on disposition of MBS Dev.  See Note 4 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” and Note 15 “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for further information.

Investments

In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company impaired the remaining investment of $1.2 million in its minority interest in the capital stock of a managed print services and technology solution business that was acquired in 2010. This charge and the Company’s share of the earnings and losses of this investment are included in the Operating Expenses section of the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For all acquisitions, account balances and results of operations are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements as of the date acquired.


Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Various assumptions and other factors underlie the determination of significant accounting estimates. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, and in some cases, actuarial techniques. The Company periodically reevaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate.

Supplier Allowances

Supplier allowances (fixed or variable) are common practice in the business products industry and have a significant impact on the Company’s overall gross margin. Receivables related to supplier allowances totaled $124.4 million and $103.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These receivables are included in “Accounts receivable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The majority of the Company’s annual supplier allowances and incentives are variable, based solely on the volume and mix of the Company’s product purchases from suppliers. These variable allowances are recorded based on the Company’s annual inventory purchase volumes and product mix and are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as a reduction to cost of goods sold, thereby reflecting the net inventory purchase cost. The remaining portion of the Company’s annual supplier allowances and incentives are fixed and are earned based primarily on supplier participation in specific Company advertising and marketing publications. Fixed allowances and incentives are taken to income through cost of goods sold as inventory is sold. Supplier allowances and incentives attributable to unsold inventory are carried as a component of net inventory cost.

Customer Rebates

Customer rebates and discounts are common practice in the business products industry and have a significant impact on the Company’s overall sales and gross margin. Customer rebates include volume rebates, sales growth incentives, advertising allowances, participation in promotions and other miscellaneous discount programs. These rebates are paid to customers monthly, quarterly and/or annually. Such rebates are reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a reduction of sales. Accrued customer rebates were $63.2 million and $52.6 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are included as a component of “Accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when a service is rendered or when title to the product has transferred to the customer. Management records an estimate for future product returns related to revenue recognized in the current period. This estimate is based on historical product return trends and the gross margin associated with those returns. Management also records customer rebates that are based on annual sales volume to the Company’s customers. Annual rebates earned by customers include growth components, volume hurdle components, and advertising allowances.

Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are treated as revenues and recognized at the time title to the product has transferred to the customer. Freight costs are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of cost of goods sold and are not netted against shipping and handling revenues. Net sales do not include sales tax charged to customers.

Additional revenue is generated fromCustomer Rebates

Customer rebates and discounts are common practice in the salebusiness products industry and have a significant impact on the Company’s overall sales and gross margin. Customer rebates include volume rebates, sales growth incentives, advertising allowances, participation in promotions and other miscellaneous discount programs. These rebates are paid to customers monthly, quarterly and/or annually. Such rebates are reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a reduction of software licenses, deliverysales. Prepaid customer rebates were $47.9 million and $36.3 million as of subscription services (includingDecember 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included as a component of “Other current assets” and “Other assets”. Accrued customer rebates were $65.3 million and $63.6 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included as a component of “Accrued liabilities” in the right to use software and software maintenance services), and professional services. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fees are fixed and determinable, and collection is considered probable. If collection is not considered probable, the Company recognizes revenue when the fees are collected. If fees are not fixed and determinable, the Company recognizes revenues when the fees become due from the customer.Consolidated Balance Sheets.

36


Share-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2014,2016, the Company had two active share-based employee compensation plans covering key associates and/or non-employee directors of the Company. See Note 35 - “Share-Based Compensation” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.


Accounts Receivable

In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to customers. Accounts receivable, as shown in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, include such trade accounts receivable and are net of allowances for doubtful accounts and anticipated discounts. The Company makes judgments as to the collectability of trade accounts receivable based on historical trends and future expectations. Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts, which addresses the collectability of trade accounts receivable. This allowance adjusts gross trade accounts receivable downward to its estimated collectible or net realizable value. To determine the allowance for doubtful accounts, management reviews specific customer risks and the Company’s trade accounts receivable aging. Uncollectible trade receivable balances are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is determined that the trade receivable balance is uncollectible.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is initially recorded based on the premium paid for acquisitions and is subsequently tested for impairment. See Note 4 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair market values determined on quoted market prices in active markets, if available, or recognized valuation models. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. Intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. See Note 4 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Insured Loss Liability Estimates

The Company is primarily responsible for retained liabilities related to workers’ compensation, vehicle, and certain employee health benefits. The Company records expense for paid and open claims and an expense for claims incurred but not reported based upon historical trends and certain assumptions about future events. The Company has an annual per-person maximum cap, provided by a third-party insurance company, on certain employee medical benefits. In addition, the Company has a per-occurrence maximum on workers’ compensation and auto claims.

Leases

The Company leases real estate and personal property under operating leases. Certain operating leases include incentives from landlords including, landlord “build-out” allowances, rent escalation clauses and rent holidays or periods in which rent is not payable for a certain amount of time. The Company accounts for landlord “build-out” allowances as deferred rent at the time of possession and amortizes this deferred rent on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

The Company also recognizes leasehold improvements associated with the “build-out” allowances and amortizes these improvements over the shorter of (1) the term of the lease or (2) the expected life of the respective improvements. The Company accounts for rent escalation and rent holidays as deferred rent at the time of possession and amortizes this deferred rent on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2014, any capital leases to which the Company is a party are immaterial to the Company’s financial statements.


Inventories

Approximately 74% and 76% of total inventory as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively has been valued under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) accounting method. LIFO results in a better matching of costs and revenues. The remaining inventory is valued under the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) accounting method. Inventory valued under the FIFO and LIFO accounting methods is recorded at the lower of cost or market. If the Company had valued its entire inventory under the lower of FIFO cost or market, inventory would have been $118.6 million and $112.4 million higher than reported as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The annual change in the LIFO reserve as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 resulted in a $6.2 million increase, a $4.6 million increase and an $11.7 million increase, respectively, in cost of goods sold.

The change in the LIFO reserve in 2014 included a LIFO liquidation relating to decrements in four of the Company’s five LIFO pools. These decrements resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases. This liquidation resulted in LIFO income of $6.0 million which was more than offset by LIFO expense of $12.2 million related to current inflation for an overall net increase in cost of sales of $6.2 million.

The change in the LIFO reserve in 2013 included a LIFO liquidation relating to a decrement in the Company’s technology LIFO pool. This decrement resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases. This liquidation resulted in LIFO income of $0.6 million which was more than offset by LIFO expense of $5.2 million related to current inflation for an overall net increase in cost of sales of $4.6 million.

The change in the LIFO reserve for 2012 included the LIFO liquidation impact relating to decrements in the Company’s office products and technology LIFO pools. These decrements resulted in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases. These liquidations resulted in LIFO income of $3.3 million which was more than offset by LIFO expense of $15.0 million related to current inflation for a net increase in cost of sales of $11.7 million.

The Company also records adjustments to inventory for shrinkage. Inventory that is obsolete, damaged, defective or slow moving is recorded at the lower of cost or market. These adjustments are determined using historical trends and are adjusted, if necessary, as new information becomes available. The Company charges certain warehousing and administrative expenses to inventory each period with $43.3 million and $38.0 million remaining in inventory as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Pension Benefits

Calculating the Company’s obligations and expenses related to its pension requires selection and use of certain actuarial assumptions. As more fully discussed in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, these actuarial assumptions include discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, mortality rates, and rates of increase in compensation and healthcare costs. To select the appropriate actuarial assumptions, management relies on current market conditions and historical information. Pension expense for 2014 was $3.6 million, compared to $4.5 million and $5.7 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Cash Equivalents

An unfunded check balance (payments in-transit) exists for the Company’s primary disbursement accounts. Under the Company’s cash management system, the Company utilizes available borrowings, on an as-needed basis, to fund the clearing of checks as they are presented for payment. As of December 31, 2014,2016, and 2013,2015, outstanding checks totaling $62.1$34.3 million and $60.8$46.0 million, respectively, were included in “Accounts payable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounts Receivable

In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to customers. Accounts receivable, as shown in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, include such trade accounts receivable and are net of allowances for doubtful accounts and anticipated discounts. The Company makes judgments as to the collectability of trade accounts receivable based on historical trends and future expectations. Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts, which addresses the collectability of trade accounts receivable. This allowance adjusts gross trade accounts receivable downward to its estimated collectible or net realizable value. To determine the allowance for doubtful accounts, management reviews specific customer risks and the Company’s trade accounts receivable aging. Uncollectible trade receivable balances are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is determined that the trade receivable balance is uncollectible.

Supplier Allowances

Supplier allowances (fixed or variable) are common practice in the business products industry and have a significant impact on the Company’s overall gross margin. Receivables related to supplier allowances totaled $86.9 million and $111.0 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These receivables are included in “Accounts receivable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The majority of the Company’s annual supplier allowances and incentives are variable, based solely on the volume and mix of the Company’s product purchases from suppliers. These allowances are recorded based on the Company’s annual inventory purchase volumes and product mix and are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as a reduction to cost of goods sold, thereby reflecting the net inventory purchase cost. The remaining portion of the Company’s annual supplier allowances and incentives are fixed and are earned based primarily on supplier participation in specific Company advertising and marketing publications. Fixed allowances and incentives are taken to income through cost of goods sold as inventory is sold. Supplier allowances and incentives attributable to unsold inventory are carried as a component of net inventory cost.

Inventories

Approximately 98.3% and 98.4% of total inventory as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, has been valued under the Last-In-First-Out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each fiscal year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs, and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. Inventory valued under the LIFO accounting method is recorded at the lower of cost or market. If the Company had valued its entire inventory under the lower of First-In-First-Out (“FIFO”) cost or market, inventory would have been $147.9 million (includes $1.5 million LIFO reserve reduction related to Nestor acquired in 2015) and $147.8 million higher than reported as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The change in the LIFO reserve in 2016 included a LIFO liquidation relating to decrements in five of the Company’s eight LIFO pools. These decrements resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases. This liquidation resulted in LIFO income of $0.8 million which was more than offset by LIFO expense of $2.4 million related to current inflation for an overall net increase in cost of sales of $1.6 million.

The change in the LIFO reserve in 2015 included a LIFO liquidation relating to decrements in three of the Company’s eight LIFO pools. These decrements resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases. This liquidation resulted in LIFO income of $1.1 million which was more than offset by LIFO expense of $7.8 million related to current inflation for an overall net increase in cost of sales of $6.7 million.


The change in the LIFO reserve in 2014 included a LIFO liquidation relating to decrements in three of the Company’s seven LIFO pools. These decrements resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases. This liquidation resulted in LIFO income of $0.9 million which was more than offset by LIFO expense of $18.3 million related to current inflation for an overall net increase in cost of sales of $17.4 million.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are determined by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful life assigned to fixtures and equipment is from two to ten years; the estimated useful life assigned to buildings does not exceed forty years; leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful lives or the term of the applicable lease. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.


Software Capitalization

The Company capitalizes internal use software development costs in accordance with guidance on accounting for costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the software, generally not to exceed ten years. Capitalized software amortization was $8.8 million, $8.5 million and $7.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Capitalized software is included in “Property, plant and equipment” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total net capitalized software development costs are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

As of December 31,

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Capitalized software development costs

$

91,624

 

 

$

83,026

 

$

97,010

 

 

$

98,873

 

Accumulated amortization

 

(65,951

)

 

 

(59,257

)

 

(71,617

)

 

 

(73,723

)

Net capitalized software development costs

$

25,673

 

 

$

23,769

 

$

25,393

 

 

$

25,150

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected $297.9 million and $299.4 million of goodwill, and $83.7 million and $96.4 million in net intangible assets, respectively. See Note 6 - “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” to the consolidated financial statements for more information.

Insured Loss Liability Estimates

The Company is primarily responsible for retained liabilities related to workers’ compensation, vehicle, and certain employee health benefits. The Company records expense for paid and open claims and an expense for claims incurred but not reported based upon historical trends and certain assumptions about future events. The Company has an annual per-person maximum cap, provided by a third-party insurance company, on certain employee medical benefits. In addition, the Company has a per-occurrence maximum on workers’ compensation and auto claims.

Leases

The Company leases real estate and personal property under operating leases. Certain operating leases include incentives from landlords including, landlord “build-out” allowances, rent escalation clauses and rent holidays or periods in which rent is not payable for a certain amount of time. The Company accounts for landlord “build-out” allowances as deferred rent at the time of possession and amortizes this deferred rent on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

The Company also recognizes leasehold improvements associated with the “build-out” allowances and amortizes these improvements over the shorter of the term of the lease or the expected life of the respective improvements. The Company accounts for rent escalation and rent holidays as deferred rent at the time of possession and amortizes this deferred rent on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2016, any capital leases to which the Company is a party are immaterial to the Company’s financial statements.

38


Pension Benefits

Calculating the Company’s obligations and expenses related to its union and non-union pension obligation requires selection and use of certain actuarial assumptions. As more fully discussed in Note 13 – “Pension Plans and Defined Contribution Plan”, these actuarial assumptions include discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, and life expectancy of plan participants. To select the appropriate actuarial assumptions, management relies on current market conditions and historical information. Pension expense for 2016 was $5.1 million, compared to $5.4 million and $3.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. In 2016, as a result of a lump sum offer, a settlement and remeasurement of the Essendant Pension Plan was performed and resulted in a settlement loss of $12.5 million, for an aggregate pension expense of $17.6 million in 2016. See Note 13 – “Pension Plans and Defined Contribution Plan” for more information.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable (net), foreign exchange hedge assets, accounts payable, debt, and long-term interest swap liability, approximates their net carrying values.  

The fair value of the foreign exchange hedge is estimated based upon quoted market rates and the fair value of the interest rate swaps is estimated based upon the amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements as of December 31 of each year. See Note 17 - “Fair Value Measurements”, for further information.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company’s risk management policies allow for the use of derivative financial instruments to prudently manage foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate exposure. The policies do not allow such derivative financial instruments to be used for speculative purposes. At this time, the Company uses interest rate swaps which areexposure subject to the management, direction and control of its financial officers. Risk management practices, including the use of all derivative financial instruments, are presented to the Board of Directors for approval.

The policies do not allow such derivative financial instruments to be used for speculative purposes. All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet date at their fair value.

The Company’s outstanding derivative at December 31, 2014 was in a net liability position and was included in “Other Long-Term Liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding derivative was in a net asset position and is included in “Other Long-Term Assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The interest rate swaps that the Company has entered into areswap is classified as a cash flow hedgeshedge in accordance with accounting guidance on derivative instruments and hedging activities as they areit is hedging a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow to be paid by the Company. The Company uses foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge certain of its foreign exchange rate exposures related to inventory purchases, and classifies the designation contracts as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is qualified, designated and highly effective as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, until earnings are affected by the forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow, and then are reported in current earnings.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges to specific forecasted transactions or variability of cash flow.

The Company formally assesses, at both the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flow of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively in accordance with accounting guidance on derivative instruments and hedging activities. This has not occurred as all cash flow hedges contain no ineffectiveness. See Note 17, “Derivative Financial Instruments”, for further detail.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with the accounting guidance for income taxes. The Company estimates actual current tax expense and assesses temporary differences that exist due to differing treatments of items for tax and financial statement purposes. These temporary differences result in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. A provision has not been made for deferred U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as these earnings have historically been permanently invested except to the extent a liability was recorded in purchase accounting for the undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries of OKIO.K.I. Supply Co. as of the date of the acquisition. It is not practicable to determine the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability for such unremitted foreign earnings.

39


The current and deferred tax balances and income tax expense recognized by the Company are based on management’s interpretation of the tax laws of multiple jurisdictions. Income tax expense also reflects the Company’s best estimates and assumptions regarding, among other things, the level of future taxable income, interpretation of tax laws, and tax planning. Future changes in tax laws, changes in projected levels of taxable income, and tax planning could impact the effective tax rate and current and deferred tax


balances recorded by the Company. Management’s estimates as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect its best judgment giving consideration to all currently available facts and circumstances. As such, these estimates may require adjustment in the future, as additional facts become known or as circumstances change. Further, in accordance with the accounting guidance on income taxes, the tax effects from uncertain tax positions are recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements, only if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. See Note 15 – “Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements for more information.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency for the Company’s foreign operations is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated into U.S. currency at the rates of exchange at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are included in other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Income and expense items are translated at average monthly rates of exchange. Realized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions were not material.included a $11.1 million loss related to the sale of the Mexican subsidiary in 2015.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In AprilMay 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. This ASU modifies the definition of discontinued operations by limiting discontinued operations reporting to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The update also requires additional financial statement disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation. The updated guidance is effective prospectively for years beginning on or after December 15, 2014. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company elected to early adopt this guidance. This guidance was applied in the analysis of the accounting treatment of our fourth quarter 2014 divestiture of MBS Dev.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU(“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue Fromfrom Contracts Withwith Customers,, that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The ASU is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.

Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. The Company currently anticipates adopting the standard using the modified retrospective approach, which will require the Company to recognize the cumulative effect of initial adoption of the standard for all contracts as of, and new contracts after, the date of initial application.

Based on the Company’s initial assessment and detailed inspection of the revenue streams of the organization, the impact of the application of the new standard will most likely result in recognition of financing components for certain rebate arrangements that have significant, implied terms and are expected to result in a reduction of net revenues related to implicit interest associated with the significant financing components of those rebate arrangements. The Company also expects other disclosure changes resulting from certain policy elections and practical expedient uses, or allowable divergences from authoritative guidance. The Company expects that revenue recognition related to the processing, fulfillment and shipment of various warehoused goods to remain substantially unchanged. While the Company has not completed the full assessment it will continue to monitor for modifications required by the standards throughout the year ended December 31, 2017.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), that requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all leases other than those that meet the definition of short-term leases. For short-term leases, lessees may elect an accounting policy by class of underlying asset under which these assets and liabilities are not recognized and lease payments are generally recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis. This standard iswill be effective for fiscal yearsannual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,2018, including interim periods within that reporting period.period, and early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

40


In June 2014,March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, 2016-09, Compensation—Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718):, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under the new guidance, when awards vest or are settled, companies are required to record excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement instead of in additional paid-in capital (APIC). This guidance will be applied prospectively. Furthermore, companies will present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity, which companies can elect to apply retrospectively or prospectively. Under the new guidance, companies will elect whether to account for Share-Based Payments Whenforfeitures of share-based payments by recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or estimate the Termsnumber of an Award Provide Thatawards expected to be forfeited, as is currently required. This guidance will be applied using a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period.modified retrospective transition method, with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. The standard requireswill be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that a performance target that affects vestingreporting period, and that could be achieved afterearly application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition,new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and compensation cost should be recognizedCash Payments. This standard amends and adjusts how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. This ASUstatement of cash flows and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015,2017, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Thisyears and will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless impracticable. If impracticable the Company would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date possible. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the new guidance will have on its statement of cash flows or financial statement disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which eliminates the second step of the two-step goodwill and indefinite lived intangible impairment test.  Specifically, the standard willrequires an entity to perform its interim or annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.  An impairment charge would be recognized for the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value; however, the loss recognized could not have an effectexceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  An entity still has the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and is to be applied prospectively. The Company notes that the new guidance would only be impactful on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the event that an interim or annual goodwill impairment is recognized.

3. Change in Accounting Principles

Change in Method of Accounting for Inventory Valuation

In 2015, the Company changed its method of inventory costing for certain inventory in its Office and Facilities (formerly known as Business and Facility Essentials and separately known as Supply and Lagasse) operating segment to the LIFO method from the FIFO accounting method.  Prior to the change, the Office and Facilities operating segment was comprised of two separate legal entities that each utilized different methods of inventory costing: LIFO for inventories related to office products which is comprised mainly of office product and breakroom categories and FIFO for inventories related to facility products which consists of the janitorial product category. The LIFO method is preferable because i) the Company was executing an initiative to combine the office products and janitorial categories onto a single information technology and operating platform, ii) it allows for consistency in financial reporting (all domestic inventories are on LIFO), and iii) it allows for better matching of costs and revenues as historical inflationary inventory acquisition prices are expected to continue in the future and the LIFO method uses the current acquisition cost to value cost of goods sold. The change was reported through retrospective application of the new accounting policy to all periods presented. The impact of the change in the method of inventory costing for certain inventory in 2015 was a $4.2 million decrease to cost of goods sold, $2.3 million increase to net income, and $0.06 increase in basic and diluted EPS.

41


(dollars in thousands)

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

Previous Method

 

As Reported

 

Effect of Change

 

Consolidated Statement of Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

4,516,704

 

$

4,524,676

 

$

7,972

 

Gross profit

 

 

810,501

 

 

802,529

 

 

(7,972

)

Warehousing, marketing, and administrative expenses

 

 

592,050

 

 

595,673

 

 

3,623

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

194,483

 

 

182,888

 

 

(11,595

)

Income tax expense

 

 

75,285

 

 

70,773

 

 

(4,512

)

Net income

 

 

119,198

 

 

112,115

 

 

(7,083

)

Net income per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

3.08

 

$

2.90

 

$

(0.18

)

Diluted

 

$

3.05

 

$

2.87

 

$

(0.18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

119,198

 

$

112,115

 

$

(7,083

)

Comprehensive income

 

 

96,295

 

 

89,212

 

 

(7,083

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

119,198

 

$

112,115

 

$

(7,083

)

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(6,367

)

 

(10,879

)

 

(4,512

)

Inventories

 

 

(30,319

)

 

(18,724

)

 

11,595

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

77,133

 

 

77,133

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained earnings at beginning of year

 

$

1,444,238

 

$

1,438,870

 

$

(5,368

)

Retained earnings at end of year

 

 

1,541,675

 

 

1,529,224

 

 

(12,451

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Acquisitions & Dispositions

CPO Commerce, Inc.

On May 30, 2014, Essendant Co. completed the acquisition of CPO Commerce, Inc. (“CPO”), a leading internet retailer of brand name power tools and equipment. The purchase price was $37.8 million, including $5.5 million related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration. The contingent consideration ultimately paid will be determined based on CPO’s sales during a three-year period immediately following the acquisition date, and will be between zero and $10 million. The Company has currently recorded a liability for contingent consideration of $9.7 million. Any changes to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration after the original purchase accounting is completed are recorded in alignment“warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses” in the period in which a change occurs. The Company financed the 100% stock acquisition with borrowings under the Company’s currentavailable committed bank facilities. Purchase accounting policies for equitythis transaction was completed as of May 30, 2015.

CPO contributed $135.8 million and $119.7 million to the Company’s 2016 and 2015 net sales, respectively. Had the CPO acquisition been completed as of the beginning of 2014, the Company’s unaudited pro forma net sales and net income for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2014 would not have been materially impacted.

42


MEDCO

On October 31, 2014, Essendant Co. completed the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Liberty Bell Equipment Corp., a United States wholesaler of automotive aftermarket tools and equipment, and its affiliates (collectively, MEDCO) including G2S Equipement de Fabrication et d’Entretien, a Canadian wholesaler. The purchase price was $150.4 million, including $4.7 million related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration. The contingent consideration ultimately paid will be determined based compensation.on MEDCO’s sales and EBITDA during a three-year period immediately following the acquisition date. The final payments related to the contingent consideration will be determined by actual achievement in the earn-out periods and will be between zero and $10 million. The Company paid approximately $1.7 million in 2016 and has a liability for contingent consideration of $3.2 million remaining. Any changes to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration after the original purchase accounting is completed are recorded in “warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses” in the period in which a change occurs. Additionally, $6.0 million was reserved as a payable upon completion of an eighteen-month indemnification period, which was paid during the second quarter of 2016. This acquisition was funded through a combination of cash on hand and cash available under the Company’s committed bank facilities. Purchase accounting for this transaction was completed as of October 31, 2015.  

MEDCO contributed $271.1 million and $270.8 million to the Company’s 2016 and 2015 net sales, respectively. Had the MEDCO acquisition been completed as of the beginning of 2014, the Company’s unaudited pro forma net sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 would have been $5.5 billion, and the Company’s unaudited pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 would have been $117.9 million.   

Nestor Sales LLC

On July 31, 2015, Essendant Co. completed the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Nestor Sales LLC (“Nestor”), a leading wholesaler and distributor of tools, equipment and supplies to the transportation industry. The purchase price was $41.8 million. This acquisition was funded through a combination of cash on hand and cash available under the Company’s revolving credit facility. Purchase accounting for this transaction was completed as of June 30, 2016.

Nestor contributed $64.9 million to the Company’s 2016 net sales. Had the Nestor acquisition been completed as of the beginning of 2014, the Company’s unaudited pro forma net sales and net income for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 would not have been materially impacted.

The final allocations of the purchase prices were as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

CPO

 

 

MEDCO

 

 

NESTOR

 

Purchase price, net of cash acquired

$

32,225

 

 

$

145,873

 

 

$

39,983

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(2,956

)

 

 

(44,815

)

 

 

(9,230

)

Inventories

 

(13,051

)

 

 

(55,491

)

 

 

(12,067

)

Other current assets

 

(269

)

 

 

(1,299

)

 

 

(339

)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

(488

)

 

 

(4,408

)

 

 

(1,251

)

Other assets

 

-

 

 

 

(650

)

 

 

(752

)

Intangible assets

 

(12,800

)

 

 

(40,000

)

 

 

(16,930

)

Total assets acquired

 

(29,564

)

 

 

(146,663

)

 

 

(40,569

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

16,911

 

 

 

32,383

 

 

 

4,992

 

Accrued liabilities

 

2,580

 

 

 

5,542

 

 

 

1,943

 

Deferred income taxes

 

3,453

 

 

 

2,167

 

 

 

3,287

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

90

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

76

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

23,034

 

 

 

40,144

 

 

 

10,298

 

     Goodwill

$

25,695

 

 

$

39,354

 

 

$

9,712

 

 

 

3.43


The purchased identifiable intangible assets were as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

CPO

 

MEDCO

 

NESTOR

 

Total

 

 

Estimated Life

 

Total

 

 

Estimated Life

 

Total

 

 

Estimated Life

Customer relationships

$

5,200

 

 

3 years

 

$

37,590

 

 

3-15 years

 

$

15,570

 

 

13 years

Trademark

 

7,600

 

 

15 years

 

 

2,410

 

 

1.5-15 years

 

 

1,360

 

 

2.5-15 years

     Total

$

12,800

 

 

 

 

$

40,000

 

 

 

 

$

16,930

 

 

 

Disposition of Azerty de Mexico

In September 2015, the Company completed the 100% stock-sale of its subsidiary, Azerty de Mexico, to the local general manager. The sale price was a combination of cash and a seller’s note, totaling $8.7 million.  Final payment on the seller’s note was received in 2016. When the decision to sell the subsidiary was approved, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360-10-45-9 Property, Plant, and Equipment, Azerty de Mexico met all of the criteria to be classified as a held-for-sale asset disposal group. In accordance with ASC 350-20-40, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, the Company allocated a proportionate share of the goodwill balance from the Office and Facilities reporting unit based on the subsidiary’s relative fair value to the reporting unit and performed an impairment test for the allocated goodwill utilizing the cost approach to value the subsidiary. Based upon the impairment test, the $3.3 million of goodwill allocated to the subsidiary was determined to be fully impaired. Additionally, in conjunction with classifying the subsidiary as a held-for-sale asset disposal group, the Company revalued the subsidiary to fair value using the cost-approach method less the estimated cost to sell. The carrying value of the disposal group, including a $10.1 million cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, was then compared to the fair value less the estimated cost to sell, resulting in a pre-tax impairment loss of $10.1 million. The goodwill impairment of $3.3 million, the held-for-sale impairment of $10.1 million, and the additional costs to sell of $3.6 million were recorded in 2015 within “warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses. The loss recorded upon the disposition of Azerty de Mexico was $1.5 million. The pre-tax loss, excluding the foreign currency translation adjustment noted above, attributable to Azerty de Mexico was $5.2 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Disposition of MBS Dev

On December 16, 2014, the Company sold MBS Dev, as subsidiary focused on software solutions for distribution companies. In conjunction with this sale, the Company recognized an $8.2 million loss on the disposition of the business. This consisted of a $9.0 million goodwill impairment and an $0.8 million gain on the disposal. See Note 6 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for further detail.

5. Share-Based Compensation

Overview

As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company has two active equity compensation plans. A description of these plans is as follows:

Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan

Pursuant to the United StationersEssendant Inc. Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, non-employee directors may defer receipt of all or a portion of their retainer and meeting fees. Fees deferred are credited quarterly to each participating director in the form of stock units, based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the quarterly deferral date. Each stock unit account generally is distributed and settled in whole shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, with a cash-out of any fractional stock unit interests, after the participant ceases to serve as a Company director. For each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company recorded compensation expense of $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million, respectively.million. As of


December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 the accumulated number of stock units outstanding under this plan was 43,082; 56,737;40,189, 41,051, and 62,421;43,082, respectively.

Amended and Restated 2004

2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)

In May 2011,2015, the Company’s shareholders approved the LTIP to, among other things, attract and retain managerial talent, further align the interest of key associates to those of the Company’s stockholders and provide competitive compensation to key associates. Award vehicles include, but are not limited to, stock options, restricted stock appreciation rights, full value awards, cash incentive awardsrestricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based awards. Key associatesAssociates and non-employee directors of the Company are eligible to become participants in the LTIP, except that non-employee directors may not be granted stock options.


Accounting For Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes the share-based compensation expense (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-tax expense

 

$

8,195

 

 

$

10,808

 

 

$

8,746

 

 

$

10,202

 

 

$

7,895

 

 

$

8,195

 

Tax effect

 

 

(3,114

)

 

 

(4,108

)

 

 

(3,323

)

 

 

(3,846

)

 

 

(3,000

)

 

 

(3,114

)

After tax expense

 

$

5,081

 

 

$

6,700

 

 

$

5,423

 

 

$

6,356

 

 

$

4,895

 

 

$

5,081

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic shares—Weighted average shares

 

 

38,705

 

 

 

39,650

 

 

 

40,337

 

 

 

36,580

 

 

 

37,457

 

 

 

38,705

 

Denominator for diluted shares—Adjusted weighted average shares and the effect of dilutive securities

 

 

39,130

 

 

 

40,236

 

 

 

40,991

 

 

 

36,918

 

 

 

37,457

 

 

 

39,130

 

Net expense per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net expense per share—basic

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

0.17

 

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

0.17

 

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

0.13

 

Net expense per share—diluted

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

0.17

 

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

0.17

 

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

0.13

 

The following tables summarize the intrinsic value of options outstanding, exercisable, and exercised for the applicable periods listed below:below (in thousands):


 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Exercisable

 

 

Exercised

 

2014

 

$

6,092

 

 

$

4,543

 

 

$

537

 

2013

 

 

9,897

 

 

 

6,262

 

 

 

13,676

 

2012

 

 

8,420

 

 

 

8,420

 

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Exercisable

 

 

Exercised

 

2016

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

535

 

2015

 

 

1,253

 

 

 

1,253

 

 

 

902

 

2014

 

 

6,092

 

 

 

4,543

 

 

 

537

 

 

The following tables summarize the intrinsic value of restricted shares outstanding and vested for the applicable periods listed below:below (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Vested

 

2014

 

$

45,928

 

 

$

10,976

 

2013

 

 

47,780

 

 

 

12,414

 

2012

 

 

40,222

 

 

 

8,812

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Vested

 

2016

 

$

29,056

 

 

$

4,705

 

2015

 

 

34,981

 

 

 

8,159

 

2014

 

 

45,928

 

 

 

10,976

 

45



The aggregate intrinsic values summarized in the tables above are based on the closing sale price per share for the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock on the last day of trading in each year which was $42.16, $45.89,$20.90, $32.51, and $30.99$42.16 per share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. Additionally, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable does not include the value of options for which the exercise price exceeds the stock price as of the last day of trading in each year.

Stock Options

The fair value of option awardsIn 2016 and modifications to option awards is estimated on the date of grant or modification using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses various assumptions including the expected2015, there were no stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, and expected life of the option. The expected term of options granted is derived from the historical forfeiture and exercise behavior and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected volatility of the price of the underlying shares is implied based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected dividends were based on the current dividend yield of the Company’s stock as of the date of the grant. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effecttherefore, at the time of grant. The assumptions used are shown in the following table.

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Weighted average expected term

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

 

5.6

 

Expected volatility

 

 

39.12

%

 

40.01 -

 

40.49

%

Weighted average volatility

 

 

39.12

%

 

 

 

40.48

%

Weighted average expected dividends

 

 

1.24

%

 

 

 

1.46

%

Risk-free rate

 

 

1.75

%

 

0.76 -

 

1.62

%

Stock options granted in 2014 and 2013 vest at the end of 2.25 years and 3 years, respectively, and have a term of 10 years. Previously issued stock options generally vested in annual increments over three years and have a term of 10 years. Compensation costs for all stock options are recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2014,2016, there was $2.5 million ofno unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards granted. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.25 years. In 2014, there were 5,538 stock options granted. In 2013, there were 585,189 stock options granted. There were no stock options granted during 2012.

The following table summarizes the transactions, excluding restricted stock, under the Company’s equity compensation plans for the last three years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

2014

 

 

Price

 

 

2013

 

 

Price

 

 

2012

 

 

Price

 

 

2016

 

 

Price

 

 

2015

 

 

Price

 

 

2014

 

 

Price

 

Options outstanding—January 1

 

 

812,160

 

 

$

33.70

 

 

 

1,371,850

 

 

$

24.86

 

 

 

1,715,380

 

 

$

24.62

 

 

 

448,687

 

 

$

33.31

 

 

 

727,378

 

 

$

33.81

 

 

 

812,160

 

 

$

33.70

 

Granted

 

 

5,538

 

 

 

45.89

 

 

 

585,189

 

 

 

38.71

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,538

 

 

 

45.89

 

Exercised

 

 

(32,610

)

 

 

24.43

 

 

 

(1,065,920

)

 

 

24.69

 

 

 

(217,634

)

 

 

18.69

 

 

 

(82,228

)

 

 

24.94

 

 

 

(77,918

)

 

 

24.11

 

 

 

(32,610

)

 

 

24.43

 

Cancelled

 

 

(57,710

)

 

 

38.74

 

 

 

(78,959

)

 

 

38.69

 

 

 

(125,896

)

 

 

32.35

 

 

 

(35,988

)

 

 

38.69

 

 

 

(200,773

)

 

 

38.71

 

 

 

(57,710

)

 

 

38.74

 

Expired

 

 

(100,938

)

 

 

31.13

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Options outstanding—December 31

 

 

727,378

 

 

$

33.81

 

 

 

812,160

 

 

$

33.70

 

 

 

1,371,850

 

 

$

24.86

 

 

 

229,533

 

 

$

36.42

 

 

 

448,687

 

 

$

33.31

 

 

 

727,378

 

 

$

33.81

 

Number of options exercisable

 

 

273,320

 

 

$

25.54

 

 

 

305,930

 

 

$

25.42

 

 

 

1,371,850

 

 

$

24.86

 

 

 

229,533

 

 

$

36.42

 

 

 

195,402

 

 

$

26.11

 

 

 

273,320

 

 

$

25.54

 

The following table summarizes proceeds related to option exercises and related tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from options exercised

 

2,097

 

 

 

1,939

 

 

 

814

 

Tax Benefit

 

199

 

 

 

340

 

 

 

203

 

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable options granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014:

2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise Prices

 

Outstanding

 

 

Life (Years)

 

 

Exercisable

 

20.00 - 25.00

 

 

178,382

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

178,382

 

25.01 - 30.00

 

 

92,692

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

92,692

 

30.01 - 35.00

 

 

2,246

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

2,246

 

35.01 - 40.00

 

 

448,520

 

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

-

 

40.01 - 50.00

 

 

5,538

 

 

 

9.0

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

 

727,378

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

273,320

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise Prices

 

Outstanding

 

 

Life (Years)

 

 

Exercisable

 

25.00-30.00

 

 

60,216

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

60,216

 

30.01-35.00

 

 

2,246

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

2,246

 

35.01-40.00

 

 

161,533

 

 

 

6.1

 

 

 

161,533

 

45.01-50.00

 

 

5,538

 

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

5,538

 

Total

 

 

229,533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

229,533

 

46


Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The Company granted 554,491 shares of restricted stock and 276,110 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) during 2016. During 2015, the Company granted 462,697 shares of restricted stock and 162,092 restricted stock units (“RSUs”). During 2014, the Company granted 253,042 shares of restricted stock and 176,717 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) during 2014. During 2013, the Company granted 181,916 shares of restricted stock and 166,348 RSUs. During 2012, the Company granted 461,512 shares of restricted stock and 245,737 RSUs. The restricted stock granted in each period generally vests in three equal annual installments on the anniversaries of the date of the grant. The majority of the RSUs granted in 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 vest in 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the majority of the RSUs granted in 2014 vest in three annual installments based on the terms of the agreements,agreements. The 2016 and 2015 RSUs vest to the extent earned based on the Company’s cumulative net income or economic profit performanceand cumulative working capital efficiency against target economic profit goals. Certain grants made in 2016 include total shareholder return as a metric for vesting as well. The 2014 RSUs are based on net income attainment each year of the vesting period. The performance-based RSUs granted in 20142016, 2015, and 20132014 have a minimum and maximum payout of zero to 200%. The performance-based RSUs granted in 2012 have a minimum and maximum payout of zero to 150%. Included in the 2014, 2013,2016, 2015, and 20122014 grants were 271,594, 194,517,383,196, 333,268, and 426,064271,594 shares of restricted stock and RSUs granted to employees who were not executive officers, as of December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. In addition, there were 20,664, 23,898,55,120, 30,778, and 41,05120,664 shares of restricted stock and RSUs granted to non-employee directors during the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012, respectively,2014, there were also 137,501, 129,849,392,285, 260,743, and 240,134137,501 shares of restricted stock and RSUs granted to executive officers.officers, respectively. The restricted stock granted to executive officers vests with respect to each officer in annual increments over three years, provided that the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the officer is still employed as of the anniversary date of the grant;grant, and (2) the Company’s cumulative diluted earnings per share for the four calendar quarters immediately preceding the vesting date exceed $0.50 per diluted share as defined in the officers’ restricted stock agreement. As of December 31, 2014,2016, there was $12.9$16.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock and RSUs granted. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.12.0 years. The following table summarizes restricted stock and RSU transactions for the last three years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

Restricted Stock and RSUs

 

2014

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

2013

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

2012

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

2016

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

2015

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

2014

 

 

Fair Value

 

Nonvested—January 1

 

 

1,041,189

 

 

$

31.24

 

 

 

1,297,906

 

 

$

28.61

 

 

 

1,002,125

 

 

$

26.42

 

 

 

1,076,000

 

 

$

36.13

 

 

 

1,089,374

 

 

$

31.23

 

 

 

1,041,189

 

 

$

31.24

 

Granted

 

 

429,759

 

 

 

40.52

 

 

 

348,264

 

 

 

38.28

 

 

 

707,249

 

 

 

27.84

 

 

 

830,601

 

 

 

24.34

 

 

 

624,789

 

 

 

36.79

 

 

 

429,759

 

 

 

40.52

 

Vested

 

 

(237,739

)

 

 

41.59

 

 

 

(323,159

)

 

 

37.02

 

 

 

(324,345

)

 

 

22.00

 

 

 

(196,394

)

 

 

37.32

 

 

 

(212,537

)

 

 

33.94

 

 

 

(237,739

)

 

 

41.59

 

Cancelled

 

 

(143,835

)

 

 

34.04

 

 

 

(281,822

)

 

 

30.04

 

 

 

(87,123

)

 

 

28.16

 

 

 

(319,965

)

 

 

36.31

 

 

 

(425,626

)

 

 

34.58

 

 

 

(143,835

)

 

 

34.04

 

Nonvested—December 31

 

 

1,089,374

 

 

$

31.23

 

 

 

1,041,189

 

 

$

31.24

 

 

 

1,297,906

 

 

$

28.61

 

 

 

1,390,242

 

 

$

28.88

 

 

 

1,076,000

 

 

$

36.13

 

 

 

1,089,374

 

 

$

31.23

 

 

 

4.6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested

The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basisannually as of October 1 as well as between annual tests if an event occursand whenever events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change that would more likely than not reducein the business climate, loss of key personnel or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit. Determining whether an impairment has occurred requires a comparison of the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit to the fair value of the respective reporting unit belowunit.  

Acquired intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair market values determined on quoted market prices in active markets, if available, or recognized valuation models. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. Intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company makes an annual impairment assessment of its carrying value. Based onintangibles.

During the 2016 annual impairment test, completed in 2014,conducted as of October 1, 2016, the Company concluded that the fair valuegoodwill and intangibles of each ofall the Company’s four reporting units excluding MBS Dev,were not impaired.

During the 2015 annual impairment test, it was in excess of the carrying value. The Company makes a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculatedetermined that the fair value of the Industrial reporting unit (formerly ORS Industrial) was below its carrying value. The fair value of the business was impacted by the macroeconomic environment in the oilfield and energy sectors that was projected to have a long-term downturn, causing a change in strategic direction for Industrial. Industrial, under new leadership, planned to diversify its offerings to lessen dependencies on the oilfield and energy sectors by revising its merchandising and sales strategy.  

The determination of fair value for the reporting unit.unit was based on a combination of prices and M&A transactions of comparable businesses and forecasted future discounted cash flows. The amount of the goodwill impairment was determined by valuing the entity’s assets and liabilities at fair value and comparing the fair value of the implied goodwill to its carrying value. Upon completion of this calculation, the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeded the implied fair value resulting in a goodwill impairment of $113.8 million.  

47


In addition, as part of this strategic review, the Company applied this qualitative approach to onedetermined a portion of its four reporting units. Twoinventory would no longer be offered and, therefore, was obsolete as of December 31, 2015. This determination resulted in an additional reserve of $4.9 million.

In connection with the other four reporting units were evaluated for impairment usingsale of Azerty de Mexico in 2015, the market based and/or the discounted cash flow approach to determine fair value. At the Company’s annualCompany performed an impairment test dateand determined that $3.3 million of October 1, 2014, the Company concluded for three of the four reporting units that goodwill was not impaired as prescribed by related accounting guidance.

Priorallocated to the completion ofsubsidiary was fully impaired. See Note 4, “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” for further detail.

During the annual goodwill2014 impairment test, for MBS Dev, the Company began negotiating the sale of MBS Dev with third parties and concluded that this change in strategy for MBS Dev was an interim indicator of impairment that necessitated an interim test for goodwill impairment. The Company completed a goodwill impairment test as of the date the assets were classified as held for sale, and used a market approach to determine the fair value of the MBS Dev reporting unit. The fair value of the MBS Dev reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value, requiring the Company to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss by valuing the entity’s assets and liabilities at fair value and comparing the fair value of the implied goodwill to the carrying value of goodwill. Upon completion of this calculation, the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of that goodwill, resulting in a goodwill impairment of $9.0 million. The goodwill impairment was partially offset by the fair value of the consideration received for MBS Dev being in excess of the carrying value, leading to a total loss on disposition of MBS Dev of $8.2 million.  The recognized and unrecognized intangible assets were valued using the cost method and relief from royalty approach using estimates of forecasted future revenues.


Indefinite lived intangible assetsImpairment losses are tested for impairment annually asreported in warehousing, marketing, and administrative expenses and inventory reserve is a component of October 1 or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Basedcost of goods sold on the testing completed in 2014 and no changes in circumstances in the fourth quarter of 2014, intangible values exceeded their book value. In the fourth quarter of 2012, it was determined that a trade name acquired in a past acquisition was no longer in use and therefore was fully impaired. The Company wrote off the value of this indefinite lived intangible, $0.7 million, in the fourth quarter of 2012 and included this amount within operating expenses in theCompany’s Consolidated Statement of Income and within depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.Operations.

As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected $398.0$297.9 million and $356.8$299.4 million of goodwill, and $112.0 million and $65.5 million in net intangible assets, respectively.

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are noted in the following table (in thousands):

Goodwill, balance as of December 31,  2013

$

356,811

 

Acquisition of CPO

 

25,108

 

Acquisition of MEDCO

 

30,514

 

Impairment of MBS Dev Goodwill

 

(9,034

)

MBS Dev divestiture

 

(4,599

)

Currency translation adjustment

 

(758

)

Goodwill, balance as of December 31, 2014

$

398,042

 

Goodwill, balance as of December 31, 2015

 

$

299,355

 

Purchase accounting adjustments

 

 

(1,858

)

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

409

 

Goodwill, balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

297,906

 

Net intangible assets consist primarily of customer lists, trademarks, and non-compete agreements purchased as part of past acquisitions. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected $83.7 million and $96.4 million in net intangible assets, respectively. The Company has no intention to renew or extend the terms of acquired intangible assets and accordingly, did not incur any related costs during 20142016 or 2013. Amortization2015. All of the Company’s intangible assets purchased as part of these acquisitionsare subject to amortization, which totaled $8.6$12.2 million, $7.0$15.1 million, and $6.1$8.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. Accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 totaled $45.2$72.1 million and $38.8$59.9 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the intangible assets of the Company by major class of intangible assets and the cost, accumulated amortization, net carrying amount, and weighted average life if applicable (in thousands):

 

December 31, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

December 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Useful

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Useful

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Useful

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Useful

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Life

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Life

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Life

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Life

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

(years)

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

(years)

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

(years)

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

(years)

Intangible assets subject to amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships and other intangibles

$

125,761

 

 

$

(41,123

)

 

$

84,638

 

 

16

 

$

84,470

 

 

$

(36,232

)

 

$

48,238

 

 

17

 

$

137,452

 

 

$

(62,235

)

 

$

75,217

 

 

16

 

$

137,938

 

 

$

(51,357

)

 

$

86,581

 

 

16

Non-compete agreements

 

4,672

 

 

 

(2,364

)

 

 

2,308

 

 

4

 

 

4,700

 

 

 

(1,952

)

 

 

2,748

 

 

4

 

 

4,649

 

 

 

(4,260

)

 

 

389

 

 

4

 

 

4,644

 

 

 

(4,260

)

 

 

384

 

 

4

Trademarks

 

14,428

 

 

 

(1,716

)

 

 

12,712

 

 

13

 

 

2,890

 

 

 

(674

)

 

 

2,216

 

 

5

 

 

13,704

 

 

 

(5,620

)

 

 

8,084

 

 

14

 

 

13,688

 

 

 

(4,240

)

 

 

9,448

 

 

14

Total

$

144,861

 

 

$

(45,203

)

 

$

99,658

 

 

 

 

$

92,060

 

 

$

(38,858

)

 

$

53,202

 

 

 

 

$

155,805

 

 

$

(72,115

)

 

$

83,690

 

 

 

 

$

156,270

 

 

$

(59,857

)

 

$

96,413

 

 

 

Intangible assets not subject to amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trademarks

 

12,300

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

12,300

 

 

n/a

 

 

12,300

 

 

-

 

 

 

12,300

 

 

n/a

Total

$

157,161

 

 

$

(45,203

)

 

$

111,958

 

 

 

 

$

104,360

 

 

$

(38,858

)

 

$

65,502

 

 

 

48


The following table summarizes the amortization expense expected to be incurred over the next five years on intangible assets (in thousands):

 

Year

Amounts

 

2015

$

13,943

 

2016

 

13,360

 

2017

 

11,296

 

2018

 

7,521

 

2019

 

5,749

 

The Company’s industry is changing rapidly and is being shaped by digitalization of work and office, the blurring of its traditional channels, a massive marketing shift to online away from brick and mortar stores, and the convergence of Business-to-Business and


Business-to-Consumer.  As a result, the Company is executing actions to reposition itself for success and to continue to give its customers what they need to succeed.  A key action in the repositioning was the approval of a rebranding plan in February 2015. This rebranding plan will be presented for stockholder approval in the proxy statement for the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. At December 31, 2014, the Company held approximately $12.0 million in intangible assets related to brand names; the Company expects to substantially reduce its use of these brand names as a result of the rebranding.  Accordingly, the Company anticipates in the first quarter of 2015 that certain indefinite lived intangible assets will become definite lived and there will be a reduction to the useful lives of certain other intangible assets.  The Company anticipates recording a non-cash impairment charge during the first quarter of 2015 of approximately $10.0 million and an impact of $12.0 million for the full year 2015 related to impairment and amortization of these intangibles.

The Company will also continue to exit non-strategic channels and categories during 2015 to further align with its strategies.  In February 2015, the Company approved a plan to sell a subsidiary in Mexico. The Company will actively market the entity as an asset sale and plans to dispose of the entity by the end of 2015.  In conjunction with the classification as held-for-sale, in accordance with ASC 205, the Company is currently estimating a non-cash loss related to the revaluation of these assets of $12.0 million to $16.0 million in the first quarter of 2015. The Company anticipates additional impacts during 2015 related to transaction expenses and foreign exchange volatility. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $9.4 million recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income related to the subsidiary’s deferred foreign exchange loss.  

As of December 31, 2014, the carrying amounts of the Mexican subsidiary by major classes of assets and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are as follows (in thousands):  

 

Amount

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

1,288

 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

 

9,355

 

Inventories

 

14,757

 

Other current assets

 

261

 

Total current assets

 

25,661

 

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

 

 

 

Fixtures and equipment

 

589

 

Capitalized software costs

 

109

 

Total property, plant and equipment

 

698

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

576

 

Net property, plant equipment

 

122

 

Goodwill

 

4,621

 

Other assets

 

658

 

Total assets

$

31,062

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

5,242

 

Accrued liabilities

 

1,651

 

Total current liabilities

 

6,893

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

7

 

Total liabilities

$

6,900

 

Year

 

Amounts

 

2017

 

$

10,777

 

2018

 

 

8,039

 

2019

 

 

6,922

 

2020

 

 

6,919

 

2021

 

 

6,919

 

 

 

5.7. Severance and Restructuring Charges

Commencing in the first quarter of 2015, and continuing through the first quarter of 2016, the Company plans to implement atook certain restructuring actions which included workforce reduction, facility closures and certain facility closures.actions to reduce costs through management delayering in order to achieve broader functional alignment of the organization. The Company is currently estimating the impact ofcharges associated with these activities to be approximately $7.0 millionactions were included in the first quarter of 2015“warehousing, marketing and an additional $2.0 million in the remainder of 2015 for a total 2015 expense of approximately $9.0 million.


During the first quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a $14.4 million pre-tax charge related to a workforce reduction and facility closures.administrative expenses”. These actions were substantially completed in 2013. 2016.

The pre-tax charge is comprised of certain OKI facility closure expenses, of $1.2 millioncash flows, and severance and workforce reduction-related expenses of $13.2 million which were included in operating expenses. Cash outflows for these actions occurred primarily during 2013 and 2014 and will continue into 2015. Cash outlaysaccrued liabilities associated with these charges were $3.9 million and $8.6 million during 2014 and 2013, respectively. During 2014 and 2013, the Company reversed a portion of these charges totaling $0.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had accrued liabilities for theserestructuring actions of $0.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company approved a distribution network optimization and cost reduction program. This program was substantially completeddescribed above are noted in the first quarter of 2012 and the Company recorded a $6.2 million pre-tax charge in that period in connection with these actions. The pre-tax charge is comprised of facility closure expenses of $2.6 million and severance and related expense of $3.6 million which were included in operating expenses. Cash outlays associated with facility closures and severance in 2014 were zero and $0.2 million, respectively. Cash outlays associated with facility closures and severance in 2013 were $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Cash outlays associated with facility closures and severance in 2012 were $2.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively. During 2012, the Company reversed a portion of these severance charges totaling $0.3 million. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had accrued liabilities for these actions of zero and $0.2 million, respectively.following table (in thousands):

 

Expenses

 

Cash flow

 

Accrued Liabilities

 

 

For the years ended

December 31,

 

For the years ended

December 31,

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter 2015 Action

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Workforce reduction

$

(700

)

 

$

11,863

 

 

 

$

8,954

 

 

$

785

 

 

 

$

1,424

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter 2015 Actions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Workforce reduction

$

(510

)

 

$

5,467

 

 

 

$

539

 

 

$

3,660

 

 

 

$

758

 

   Facility closure

 

254

 

 

 

1,245

 

 

 

 

686

 

 

 

813

 

 

 

 

-

 

Total

$

(256

)

 

$

6,712

 

 

 

$

1,225

 

 

$

4,473

 

 

 

$

758

 

 

 

6.8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossIncome (Loss)

The change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”) by component, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 20142016 is as follows:

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

 

Cash Flow Hedges

 

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

 

 

Total

 

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

 

Cash Flow Hedges

 

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

 

 

Total

 

AOCI, balance as of December 31, 2013

 

$

(6,661

)

 

$

871

 

 

$

(34,098

)

 

$

(39,888

)

AOCI, balance as of December 31, 2015

 

$

(9,866

)

 

$

146

 

 

$

(47,871

)

 

$

(57,591

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications

 

 

(5,262

)

 

 

(1,063

)

 

 

(19,400

)

 

 

(25,725

)

 

 

1,427

 

 

 

(565

)

 

 

(1,299

)

 

 

(437

)

Settlement loss reclassified from AOCI

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,666

 

 

 

7,666

 

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

-

 

 

 

466

 

 

 

2,356

 

 

 

2,822

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

591

 

 

 

3,315

 

 

 

3,906

 

Net other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(5,262

)

 

 

(597

)

 

 

(17,044

)

 

 

(22,903

)

 

 

1,427

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

9,682

 

 

 

11,135

 

AOCI, balance as of December 31, 2014

 

$

(11,923

)

 

$

274

 

 

$

(51,142

)

 

$

(62,791

)

AOCI, balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

(8,439

)

 

$

172

 

 

$

(38,189

)

 

$

(46,456

)


The following table details the amounts reclassified out of AOCI into the income statement during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2014 respectively:

2016 (in thousands):

 

 

Amount Reclassified From AOCI

 

 

 

 

 

For the Twelve

 

 

 

 

 

Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

Affected Line Item In The Statement

Details About AOCI Components

 

2014

 

 

Where Net Income is Presented

Gain on interest rate swap cash flow hedges, before tax

 

$

751

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

(285

)

 

Tax provision

 

 

$

466

 

 

Net of tax

Amortization of defined benefit pension plan items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

         Prior service cost and unrecognized loss

 

$

3,856

 

 

Warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses

 

 

 

(1,500

)

 

Tax provision

 

 

 

2,356

 

 

Net of tax

Total reclassifications for the period

 

$

2,822

 

 

Net of tax

 

 

Amount Reclassified From AOCI

 

 

 

 

 

For the Twelve Months

 

 

 

 

 

Ended December 31,

 

 

Affected Line Item In The Statement

Details About AOCI Components

 

2016

 

 

Where Net Income is Presented

Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on interest rate swap, before tax

 

$

1,007

 

 

Interest expense, net

Loss on foreign exchange hedges, before tax

 

 

(42

)

 

Cost of goods sold

Tax benefit

 

 

(374

)

 

Tax provision

 

 

$

591

 

 

Net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan items

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of prior service cost and unrecognized loss

 

$

5,429

 

 

Warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses

Settlement loss

 

 

12,510

 

 

Defined benefit plan settlement loss

Tax benefit

 

 

(6,958

)

 

Tax provision

 

 

 

10,981

 

 

Net of tax

Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax

 

$

11,572

 

 

 

 

7.9. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities were exercised into common stock. Stock options, restricted stock and deferred stock units are considered dilutive securities. Stock options to purchase 0.50.2 million,


0.5 0.3 million, and 0.5 million shares of common stock were outstanding at December 31, 2014, 2013,2016, 2015, and 2012,2014, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive. An additional 0.4 million shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2015 were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to the net loss. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

119,198

 

 

$

123,170

 

 

$

111,830

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

63,852

 

 

$

(44,342

)

 

$

112,115

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic earnings per share -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

weighted average shares

 

 

38,705

 

 

 

39,650

 

 

 

40,337

 

 

 

36,580

 

 

 

37,457

 

 

 

38,705

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee stock options and restricted units

 

 

425

 

 

 

586

 

 

 

654

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

425

 

Denominator for diluted earnings per share -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted weighted average shares and the effect of dilutive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

securities

 

 

39,130

 

 

 

40,236

 

 

 

40,991

 

 

 

36,918

 

 

 

37,457

 

 

 

39,130

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share - basic

 

$

3.08

 

 

$

3.11

 

 

$

2.77

 

Net income per share - diluted

 

$

3.05

 

 

$

3.06

 

 

$

2.73

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share - basic

 

$

1.75

 

 

$

(1.18

)

 

$

2.90

 

Net income (loss) per share - diluted(1)

 

$

1.73

 

 

$

(1.18

)

 

$

2.87

 

(1)

As a result of the net loss in the year ended December 31, 2015, the effect of potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive and have been omitted from the calculation of diluted earnings per share, consistent with GAAP.

50


Common Stock Repurchases

As of December 31, 2014 the Company had $42.4 million remaining on its current Board authorization to repurchase USI common stock. In February2016 and 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase an additional $100 million of common stock. In 2014 and 2013, the Company repurchased 1,255,705241,270 and 1,684,3651,822,227 shares of USI’sESND’s common stock at an aggregate cost of $50.6$6.8 million and $62.1$67.4 million, respectively. Depending on market and business conditions and other factors, the Company may continue or suspend purchasing its common stock at any time without notice. Acquired shares are included in the issued shares of the Company and treasury stock, but are not included in average shares outstanding when calculating earnings per share data. As of December 31, 2016 the Company had $68.2 million remaining on its current Board authorization to repurchase ESND common stock.

During 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company reissued 250,747, 1,086,502,468,142, 362,874, and 619,664250,747 shares, respectively, of treasury stock to fulfill its obligations under its equity incentive plans.

 

8.10. Segment Information

Management defines operating segments as individual operations that the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) (in the Company’s case, the Chief Executive Officer) reviews for the purpose of assessing performance and making operating decisions.allocating resources. When evaluating operating segments, management considers whether:

The operating segment engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses;

·

The component engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses;

The operating results of the operating segment are regularly reviewed by the enterprise’s CODM;

·

The operating results of the component are regularly reviewed by the enterprise’s CODM;

Discrete financial information is available about the operating segment; and

·

Other factors are present, such as management structure, presentation of information to the Board of Directors and the nature of the business activity of each operating segment.

Discrete financial information is available about the component; and

·

Other factors are present, such as management structure, presentation of information to the Board of Directors and the nature of the business activity of each component.

Based on the factors referenced above, management has determined that the Company has fivefour operating segments, Supply/Lagasse, ORS Nasco, CPO,Office and Facilities, Industrial, Automotive (comprised ofand CPO. Office and Facilities includes operations in the Company’s newly acquired entity, MEDCO)United States and MBS Dev. Supply/Lagasse also includesincluded operations in Mexico conducted through a USSC subsidiary, Azerty de Mexico, which has been consolidated into the operating segment. ORS Nascowas sold in 2015. Industrial includes operations in the United States, Canada and Dubai, UAE. The Automotive operating segment includes operations in the United States and Canada. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company’s net sales from its foreign operations totaled $151.3$69.4 million, $138.2$121.9 million and $112.5$147.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, 2013,2016, 2015, and 2012,2014, long-lived assets of the Company’s foreign operations totaled $30.9 million, $32.2 million, and $42.5 million, $13.8 million, and $13.1 million, respectively.

Management has also concluded that three of the Company’s operating segments (Supply/Lagasse, ORS Nasco,(Office and Facilities, Industrial, and Automotive) meet all of the aggregation criteria required by the accounting guidance. Such determination is based on company-wide similarities in (1) the nature of products and/or services provided, (2) customers served, (3) production processes and/or distribution methods used, (4) economic characteristics including margins and earnings before interest and taxes, and (5) regulatory environment. This aggregate presentation reflects management’s approach to assessing performance and allocating resources. MBS Dev and CPO dodoes not meet the materiality thresholds for reporting individual segments and have therefore beenwas combined with the other operating segments.


The Company’s product offerings may be divided into the following primary categories: (i) traditional office products, which include writing instruments, paper products, organizers(1) janitorial, foodservice and calendarsbreakroom supplies, including foodservice consumables, safety and various office accessories; (ii)security items; (2) technology products such as computer supplies and peripherals; (iii)(3) traditional office furniture, such as desks, filingproducts, including writing instruments, organizers and storage solutions, seatingcalendars and systems furniture, along with a variety of products for niche markets such as education government, healthcare and professional services; (iv) janitorial and breakroom supplies, which includes janitorial and breakroom supplies, foodservice consumables, safety and security items, and paper and packaging supplies; and (v)various office accessories; (4) industrial supplies, which includesincluding hand and power tools, safety and security supplies, janitorial equipment and supplies, welding products; (5) cut sheet paper products; (6) automotive products, and automotivesuch as aftermarket tools and equipment. In 2014, the Company’s largest supplier was Hewlett-Packard Company which represented approximately 16% of its total purchases. No other supplier accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total purchases.

The Company’s customers include independent office products dealersequipment; and contract stationers, office products mega-dealers, office products superstores, computer products resellers,(7) office furniture, dealers, mass merchandisers, mail order companies, sanitary supply distributors, drugincluding desks, filing and grocery store chains, e-commerce dealers, other independent distributorsstorage solutions, seating and end consumers. The Company had one customer, W.B. Mason Co., Inc., which constituted approximately 12% of its 2014 consolidated net sales. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the 2014 consolidated net sales. systems furniture.

51


The following table shows net sales by product category for 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 (in thousands):

 

Years Ended December 31

 

Years Ended December 31

 

2014 (1)

 

 

2013 (1)

 

 

2012 (1)

 

2016 (1)

 

 

2015 (1)

 

 

2014 (1)

 

Janitorial and breakroom supplies

$

1,448,528

 

 

$

1,336,182

 

 

$

1,281,806

 

Janitorial, foodservice and breakroom supplies (JanSan)

$

1,435,476

 

 

$

1,457,993

 

 

$

1,443,242

 

Technology products

 

1,437,721

 

 

 

1,462,756

 

 

 

1,558,568

 

 

1,347,652

 

 

 

1,363,146

 

 

 

1,447,661

 

Traditional office products

 

1,331,797

 

 

 

1,314,456

 

 

 

1,373,399

 

 

860,324

 

 

 

860,024

 

 

 

861,649

 

Industrial supplies

 

638,752

 

 

 

517,810

 

 

 

409,266

 

 

560,682

 

 

 

586,580

 

 

 

601,937

 

Cut sheet paper

 

394,650

 

 

 

343,604

 

 

 

465,400

 

Automotive

 

316,546

 

 

 

279,966

 

 

 

33,709

 

Office furniture

 

309,003

 

 

 

311,403

 

 

 

323,390

 

 

298,655

 

 

 

318,870

 

 

 

312,203

 

Freight revenue

 

121,933

 

 

 

105,567

 

 

 

99,319

 

Other

 

39,471

 

 

 

37,119

 

 

 

34,358

 

Freight and other

 

155,037

 

 

 

152,863

 

 

 

161,404

 

Total net sales

$

5,327,205

 

 

$

5,085,293

 

 

$

5,080,106

 

$

5,369,022

 

 

$

5,363,046

 

 

$

5,327,205

 

(1)

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassificationschanges include changes between severalreclassification of specific products to different product categories due to several specific products being reclassified to different categories. These changesand did not impact the Consolidated Statements of Income.Operations.

Supplier, Customer, and Product Concentration:

9.In 2016, the Company’s largest supplier was Hewlett-Packard Company which represented approximately 20% of its total purchases as compared to 14% and 16% of total purchases in the prior years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No other supplier accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total purchases in any of the years presented. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had purchases of $18.1 million and payables of $0.7 million to a buying group in which the Company participates through its equity ownership as compared to purchases of $13.8 million and payables of $1.4 million as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The Company’s customers include independent office and workplace dealers; facilities and maintenance distributors; technology, military, automotive aftermarket, national big-box retailers and healthcare and vertical suppliers; industrial distributors and internet retailers. The Company had one customer, W.B. Mason Co., Inc., which constituted approximately 11% of its 2016 consolidated net sales, 12% of its 2015 consolidated net sales and 12% of its 2014 consolidated net sales, respectively. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s 2016, 2015 or 2014 consolidated net sales. Further, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated accounts receivable as of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

No individual product from any product grouping represented 10% or more of our net sales in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2014.

11. Debt

USIESND is a holding company and, as a result, its primary sources of funds are cash generated from operating activities of its direct operating subsidiary, USSC,ECO, and from borrowings by USSC.ECO. The 2017 Credit Agreement, 2013 Credit Agreement, the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, the 2013 Credit Agreement, the 2007 Note Purchase Agreement, and the Receivables Securitization Program (each of which are defined below) contain restrictions on the use of cash transferred from USSCECO to USI.ESND.

Debt

On February 22, 2017, ESND, ECO, ECO’s United States subsidiaries (ESND, ECO and the subsidiaries collectively referred to as the “Loan Parties”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and certain lenders entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (“2017 Credit Agreement”). The 2017 Credit Agreement amended and restated the Fourth Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 9, 2013 (as amended prior to February 22, 2017, the “2013 Credit Agreement”). Also on February 22, 2017, ESND, ECO and the holders of ECO’s 3.75% senior secured notes due January 15, 2012, (the “Notes”) entered into Amendment No. 4 (“Amendment No. 4”) to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 25, 2013, (as amended prior to February 22, 2017, the “2013 Note Purchase Agreement”).

The 2017 Credit Agreement and Amendment No. 4 eliminated covenants in the 2013 Credit Agreement and the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement that prohibited the Company from exceeding a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 (or 4.0 to 1.0 following certain permitted acquisitions) and restricted the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock when the ratio was 3.0 to 1.0 or more. As a result, the Company is no longer subject to a debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

52


Proceeds from the 2017 Credit Facility were used to repay the balances of the 2013 Credit Agreement and the Receivables Securitization Program (as defined below).

The 2017 Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility (with an aggregated committed principal amount of $1.0 billion), a first-in-last-out (“FILO”) revolving credit facility (with an aggregated committed principal amount of $100 million), and a term loan (with an aggregated committed principal amount of $77.6 million). The term loan may be funded in a single funding on or prior to April 21, 2017, but was not funded at closing. Loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement must be extended to the Company first through the FILO facility. Based on the Company’s applicable asset balances, at closing the total availability under the 2017 Credit Agreement was approximately $1.0 billion. The 2017 Credit Agreement also provides for the issuance of letters of credit, up to $25.0 million, plus an additional $165.0 million as collateral for the Company’s obligations under the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement.

Borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement bear interest at LIBOR for specified interest periods, at the REVLIBOR30 Rate (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement) or at the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement), plus, in each case, a margin determined based on the Company’s average quarterly revolving availability. Depending on the Company’s average quarterly revolving availability, the margin on LIBOR-based loans and REVLIBOR30 Rate-based loans ranges from 1.25% to 1.75% for revolving and term loans and 2.00% to 2.50% for FILO loans, and on Alternate Base Rate loans ranges from 0.25% to 0.75% for revolving and term loans and 1.00% to 1.50% for FILO loans. As of closing to June 30, 2017, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans and REVLIBOR30 Rate-based loans is 1.50% for revolving and term loans and 2.25% for FILO loans, and for Alternate Base Rate loans is 0.50% for revolving and term loans and 1.25% for FILO loans. In addition, ECO is required to pay the lenders a commitment fee on the unutilized portion of the revolving and FILO commitments under the 2017 Credit Agreement at a rate per annum equal to 0.25%. The Company can borrow up to $100.0 million of swingline revolving loans on a revolving basis; swingline loans are considered to be unutilized for purposes of the commitment fee. Letters of credit issued pursuant to the 2017 Credit Agreement incur interest based on the applicable margin rate for LIBOR-based Loans, plus 0.125%. Utilization of the 2017 Credit Agreement, consisting of borrowings and letters of credit as of the February 22, 2017 closing of the agreement were approximately $672.5 million and applicable deferred financing fees associated with the transaction will be amortized over the life of the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Obligations of ECO under the 2017 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by ESND and ECO’s domestic subsidiaries. ECO’s obligations under these agreements and the guarantors’ obligations under the guaranty are secured by liens on substantially all Company assets. Availability of credit under the revolving facility will be subject to a revolving borrowing base calculation comprised of a certain percentage of the eligible accounts receivable, plus a certain percentage of the eligible inventory, less reserves. Similarly, availability under the FILO revolving credit facility is subject to a FILO borrowing base comprised primarily of 10% of the eligible accounts receivable, plus 10% multiplied by the net orderly liquidation value percentages of the eligible inventory, less reserves. The amount of the term loan will be determined based on the value of the Company’s owned real estate and certain equipment.

The 2017 Credit Agreement contains representations and warranties, covenants and events of default that are customary for facilities of this type, including covenants to deliver periodic certifications setting forth the revolving borrowing base and FILO borrowing base. So long as the Payment Conditions (as defined in the Credit Agreement) are satisfied, the Loan Parties may pay dividends, repurchase stock and engage in certain permitted acquisitions, investments and dispositions, in each case subject to the other terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement and the other loan documents.

Prior to the closing of the 2017 Credit Agreement noted above, debt consisted of the following amounts (in millions):

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Credit Agreement

$

363.0

 

 

$

206.8

 

$

260.4

 

 

$

368.4

 

2013 Note Purchase Agreement

 

150.0

 

 

 

-

 

 

150.0

 

 

 

150.0

 

2007 Note Purchase Agreement

 

-

 

 

 

135.0

 

Receivables Securitization Program

 

200.0

 

 

 

190.7

 

 

200.0

 

 

 

200.0

 

OKI Mortgage & Capital Lease

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.2

 

Capital Lease

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Transaction Costs

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(2.2

)

Total

$

713.9

 

 

$

533.7

 

$

609.0

 

 

$

716.3

 

As of December 31, 2014, 79.0%2016, 75.4% of the Company’s outstanding debt, excluding capital leases and transaction costs, was priced at variable interest rates based primarily on the applicable bank prime rate or London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). As of December 31, 2014,2016, the overall weighted average effective borrowing rate, excluding the impact of commitment fees, of the Company’s debt was 1.9%2.5%. At December 31, 2014, 58.0%2016, 50.9% of the Company’s debt was unhedged and variable rate and a 50 basis point movement in interest rates would result in a $2.1$1.5 million change in annualized interest expense, on a pre-tax basis, and upon cash flows from operations.


53


Receivables Securitization Program

The Company’s accounts receivable securitization program (“Receivables Securitization Program” or the “Program”) provideswas terminated when the Company entered into the 2017 Credit Agreement. The Program provided maximum financing of up to $200 million. The parties to the program are USI, USSC, United Stationers Receivables, LLC (“USR”), and United Stationers Financial Services (“USFS”) and PNC Bank, National Association and the Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd New York Branch (the “Investors”). The Program is governedmillion secured by the following agreements:

·

The Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement among USSC, USFS, USR, and the Investors;

·

The Receivables Sale Agreement between USSC and USFS;

·

The Receivables Purchase Agreement between USFS and USR; and

·

The Performance Guaranty executed by USI in favor of USR.

Pursuant to the Receivables Sale Agreement, USSC sells to USFS, on an on-going basis, all the customer accounts receivable and related rights originated by USSC. Pursuant to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, USFS sells to USR, on an on-going basis, all the accounts receivable and related rights purchased from USSC. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, USR then sells the receivables and related rights to the Investors. The Program provides for maximum funding available of the lesser of $200 million or the total amount of eligible receivables less excess concentrations and applicable reserves. USFS retains servicing responsibility over the receivables. USR is a wholly-owned, bankruptcy remote special purpose subsidiary of USFS. The assets of USR are not available to satisfy the creditors of any other person, including USFS, USSC or USI, until all amounts outstanding under the Program are repaid and the Program has been terminated.ECO.

The receivables sold to investors under the Investors remainProgram remained on USI’sESND’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, and amounts advanced to USRESR by the Investor or any successor Investors arewere recorded as debt on USI’sESND’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cost of such debt is recorded as interest expense on USI’sESND’s Consolidated Statements of Income.Operations. As of December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 2013, $360.32015, $500.3 million and $355.4$448.6 million, respectively, of receivables had been sold to the Investors. As of December 31, 2014, USR2016, the Company had $200.0 million outstanding under the Program. As of December 31, 2013, USR had $190.7 million outstanding under the Program.

Credit Agreement and Other Debt

On October 15, 2007, USI and USSC entered into a Master Note Purchase Agreement (the “2007 Note Purchase Agreement”) with several purchasers. Pursuant to the 2007 Note Purchase Agreement, USSC issued and sold $135 million of floating rate senior secured notes due October 15, 2014 at par in a private placement (the “Series 2007-A Notes”). Interest on the Series 2007-A Notes was payable quarterly in arrears at a rate per annum equal to three-month LIBOR plus 1.30%, beginning January 15, 2008. The parties to the 2007 Note Purchase Agreement have satisfied their obligations under that agreement. The Company will not issue any new debt under the 2007 Note Purchase Agreement.

On November 25, 2013, USIESND and USSC,ECO, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “2013 Note Purchase Agreement”) with the note purchasers identified therein (collectively, the “Note Purchasers”). Pursuant to the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, USSCon January 15, 2014, ECO issued and the Note Purchasers purchased an aggregate of $150 million of senior secured notes due January 15, 2021 (the “2014 Notes”). The issuance of the 2014 Notes occurred on January 15, 2014. USSC used the proceeds from the sale of the 2014 Notes to repay the Series 2007-A Notes and to reduce borrowings under the 2013 Credit Agreement, which is described below. Interest on the 2014 Notes is payable semi-annually at a rate per annum equal to 3.75%. At the time USSCECO priced the 2014 Notes, USSCECO terminated the June 2013 Swap Transaction (as described in Note 17 “Derivative Financial Instruments”).Transaction. After giving effect to the impact of terminating the June 2013 Swap Transaction, the effective per annum interest rate on the 2014 Notes is 3.66%. The full principal amount ofeffective interest rate on the 2014 Notes matures on January 15, 2021.increased to 4.285% from July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016 because the Company’s Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement) as of June 30, 2016, exceeded a specified threshold. In connection with the 2017 Credit Agreement, the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement was amended to remove provisions related to the Company’s Leverage Ratio. If USSCECO elects, or is required, to prepay some or all of the 2014 Notes prior to January 15, 2021, USSCECO will be obligated to pay a Make-Whole Amountmake-whole amount calculated as set forth in the Agreement. The Company’s obligations under the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement are secured by a $165.0 million letter of credit issued under the 2017 Credit Agreement.

On July 8, 2013, the Company and USSCECO entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement (the “2013 Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Agent, and the lenders identified therein. TheAs noted above, the 2013 Credit Agreement extended the maturity date of the loan agreement to July 6, 2018.was terminated in February 2017.

The 2013 Credit Agreement providesprovided for a revolving credit facility with an aggregate committed principal amount of $700 million. The 2013 Credit Agreement also providesprovided for the issuance of letters of credit. The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $11.1$12.5 million under the 2013 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. Subject to the terms and conditions of the 2013 Credit Agreement, USSC may seek additional commitments to increase the aggregate committed principal amount to a total amount of $1.05 billion.2016.

Borrowings under the 2013 Credit Agreement bearbore interest at LIBOR for specified interest periods or at the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the 2013 Credit Agreement), plus, in each case, a margin determined based on the Company’s debt to EBITDA ratio


calculated as providedLeverage Ratio (as defined in Section 6.20 of the 2013 Credit Agreement (the “Leverage Ratio”)Agreement). Depending on the Company’s Leverage Ratio, the margin on LIBOR-based loans rangesranged from 1.00% to 2.00% and on Alternate Base Rate loans rangesranged from 0.00% to 1.00%.

As of December 31, 2014,2016, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans was 1.25% and for Alternate Base Rate loans was 0.25%. In addition, USSC is required to pay the lenders a fee on the unutilized portion of the commitments under the 2013 Credit Agreement at a rate per annum between 0.15%was 1.50% for LIBOR-based loans and 0.35%, depending on the Company’s Leverage Ratio.was 0.5% for Alternate Base Rate loans.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the 2013 Credit Agreement, USSC is permitted to incur up to $300 million of indebtedness in addition to borrowings under the 2013 Credit Agreement plus up to $200 million under the Company’s Receivables Securitization Program and up to $135 million in replacement or refinancing of the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement.

USSCECO has entered into several interest rate swap transactions to mitigate its floating rate risk on a portion of its total long-term debt. See Note 17, “Derivative Financial Instruments”2, “Summary of Significant Accounting policies”, for further details on these swap transactions and their accounting treatment.

Obligations of USSCECO under the 2013 Credit Agreement and the 2014 Notes are guaranteed by USIESND and certain of USSC’sECO’s domestic subsidiaries. USSC’s obligations under these agreements and the guarantors’ obligations under the guaranty are secured by liens on substantially all Company assets other than real property and certain accounts receivable already collateralized as part of the Receivables Securitization Program.

The 2013 Credit Agreement, the 2014 Notes and the Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement prohibit the Company from exceeding a Leverage Ratio of 3.50 to 1.00 (3.75 to 1.00 or 4.00 to 1.00 for the first four fiscal quarters following certain acquisitions). The 20132017 Credit Agreement and the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement also impose limits on the Company’s ability to repurchase stock and issue dividends when the Leverage Ratio is greater than 3.00 to 1.00.

The 2013 Credit Agreement, the 2014 Notes, and the Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement contain additional representations and warranties, covenants and events of default that arewere customary for these types of agreements. The 20132017 Credit Agreement and the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, and the Transfer and Administration Agreement contain cross-default provisions. As a result, if a termination event occurs under anyeither of those agreements, the lenders under all of the agreements2017 Credit Agreement may cease to make additional loans and the lenders under both agreements may accelerate any loans then outstanding and/or terminate the agreements to which they are party.

54


Debt maturities as of December 31, 2014,2016, were as follows (in millions):

Year

Amount

 

2018(1)

$

460.4

 

2021

 

150.0

 

Total

$

610.4

 

 

Year

Amount

 

2015

$

0.9

 

2016

 

-

 

2017

 

-

 

2018

 

563.0

 

Thereafter

 

150.0

 

Total

$

713.9

 

(1)

The debt maturity in 2018 was effectively repaid in February 2017 with borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement totaling $522.5 million due 2022.

 

 

10.12. Leases, Contractual Obligations and Contingencies

The Company has entered into non-cancelable long-term leases for certain property and equipment. Future minimum lease payments under operating leases in effect as of December 31, 20142016 having initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):

 

Operating

 

Operating

 

Year

Leases

 

Leases

 

2015

$

49,778

 

2016

 

42,854

 

2017

 

33,693

 

$

50,747

 

2018

 

25,676

 

 

47,871

 

2019

 

22,178

 

 

44,229

 

2020

 

34,994

 

2021

 

24,290

 

Thereafter

 

29,469

 

 

72,113

 

Total required lease payments

 

203,648

 

$

274,244

 

Operating lease expense was approximately $51.0 million, $48.4 million, and $45.1 million $46.3in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Sale-Leaseback

In September 2016, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale and leaseback of its facility in City of Industry, CA. The agreement provided for the sale of the facility for a purchase price of $31.7 million and $48.5the subsequent leaseback for a two year period. The lease is classified as an operating lease. As a result, the Company recorded a gain of $20.5 million in 2014, 2013“warehousing, marketing and 2012, respectively.administrative expenses.” A deferred gain of approximately $2.8 million that is being amortized into income over the term of the lease was also recorded. As of December 31, 2016, $1.0 million of the deferred gain is reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet under “other long-term liabilities”, with $1.4 million included as a component of “other current liabilities”. The cash proceeds from the sale were used primarily to pay down long-term debt.

 

11.13. Pension Plans and Defined Contribution Plan

Pension Plans

As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company has pension plans covering approximately 2,6002,250 of its active associates. Non-contributory plansA non-contributory plan covering non-union associates provideprovides pension benefits that are based on years of credited service and a percentage of annual compensation. Beginning in 2009, benefits were frozen in the plansplan covering non-union employees. Non-contributory plansA non-contributory plan covering union members generally provideprovides benefits of stated amounts based on years of service. The Company funds the plans in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company uses December 31 as its measurement date to determine its pension obligations.

55


Change in Projected Benefit Obligation

The following table sets forth the plans’ changes in Projected Benefit Obligation for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 (in thousands):

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

183,069

 

 

$

196,521

 

 

$

211,389

 

 

$

224,086

 

Service cost—benefit earned during the period

 

 

1,069

 

 

 

1,479

 

 

 

1,269

 

 

 

1,495

 

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

 

 

8,960

 

 

 

8,379

 

 

 

8,073

 

 

 

8,997

 

Union plan amendments

 

 

1,736

 

 

 

-

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

35,054

 

 

 

(16,373

)

 

 

4,547

 

 

 

(16,846

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(5,802

)

 

 

(6,937

)

 

 

(2,952

)

 

 

(6,343

)

Settlements

 

 

(40,073

)

 

 

-

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

224,086

 

 

$

183,069

 

 

$

182,253

 

 

$

211,389

 

The increase in projected benefit obligation during 2014 relates to the use of newly issued mortality assumptions released by the Society of Actuaries (“RP-2014”) and a reduction in the assumed discount rate. The use of RP-2014 increased the projected benefit obligation by $8.6 million. The accumulated benefit obligation for the planplans as of December 31, 20142016 totaled $182.3 million.

The Company has taken several actions to mitigate the interest rate, mortality and 2013 totaled $224.1investment risks of the Essendant Pension Plan. These actions include a limited-time voluntary lump-sum pension offering to eligible, terminated, vested plan participants that was completed during the second quarter of 2016. As a result of the lump sum offer, a settlement and remeasurement of the Essendant Pension Plan was performed. The remeasurement and activity in 2016 had no cash impact to the Company since the payments were made by the Essendant Pension Trust, and was a component in a $7.1 million improvement to the net funded status of the plan, therefore reducing other long-term liabilities. However, the settlement caused a loss of $12.5 million, which was partially offset by the $14.9 million reduction in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income related to the unrecognized actuarial loss, for a net impact on shareholders’ equity of $2.4 million as of December 31, 2016 when compared to December 31, 2015. This offer also reduces future pension expense recognized by the Company and $183.1 million, respectively.volatility related to future obligations of the plan.

Plan Assets and Investment Policies and Strategies

The following table sets forth the change in the plans’ assets for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 (in thousands):

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

162,250

 

 

$

145,563

 

 

$

162,977

 

 

$

173,771

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

15,323

 

 

 

10,624

 

 

 

12,136

 

 

 

(6,451

)

Company contributions

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

13,000

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

2,000

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(5,802

)

 

 

(6,937

)

 

 

(2,952

)

 

 

(6,343

)

Settlements

 

 

(40,073

)

 

 

-

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

173,771

 

 

$

162,250

 

 

$

142,088

 

 

$

162,977

 

The Company’s pension plan investment allocations, as a percentage of the fair value of total plan assets, as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, by asset category are as follows:

 

Asset Category

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Cash

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

1.2

%

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

0.4

%

Equity securities

 

 

29.6

%

 

 

29.2

%

 

 

50.8

%

 

 

37.8

%

Fixed income

 

 

45.4

%

 

 

42.5

%

 

 

27.4

%

 

 

40.5

%

Real assets

 

 

13.6

%

 

 

16.6

%

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

10.8

%

Hedge funds

 

 

10.3

%

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

11.9

%

 

 

10.5

%

Master Limited Partnerships

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

-

 

Total

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

The investment policies and strategies for the Company’s pension plan assets are established with the goals of generating above-average investment returns over time, while containing risks within acceptable levels and providing adequate liquidity for the payment


of plan obligations. The Company recognizes that there typically are tradeoffs among these objectives, and strives to minimize risk associated with a given expected return.

56


The Company’s defined benefit plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are invested primarily in a diversified mix of fixed income investments and equity securities. The Company establishes target ranges for investment allocation and sets specific allocations. The target allocations for the non-union plan assets are 50.0%45.0% fixed income, 26.0%36.0% equity securities, 14.0%9.0% real assets, and 10.0% hedge funds. The target allocations for the union plan assets are 20.0%16.0% fixed income, 50.0%62.0% equity securities, 20.0%12.0% real assets and 10.0% hedge funds. Equity securities include investments in large cap and small cap corporations located in the U.S. and a mix of both international and emerging market corporations. Fixed Incomeincome securities include investment grade bonds and U.S. treasuries. Other types of investments include commodity futures, Real Estate Investment Trustsreal estate investment trusts (REITs) and hedge funds.

Fair values for equity and fixed income securities are primarily based on valuations for identical instruments in active markets.

The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 by asset category are as follows:

Fair Value Measurements at

December 31, 20142016 (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices In

 

 

Significant

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices In

 

 

Significant

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Cash

 

 

 

$

1,831

 

 

$

1,831

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

874

 

 

$

874

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Equity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Large Cap

 

(a)

 

 

18,612

 

 

 

18,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

27,779

 

 

 

27,779

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

International Large Value

 

(c)

 

 

16,791

 

 

 

16,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International

 

(b)

 

 

21,960

 

 

 

21,960

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Emerging Markets

 

(d)

 

 

9,653

 

 

 

9,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c)

 

 

12,504

 

 

 

12,504

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

U.S. Small Value Fund

 

(e)

 

 

5,274

 

 

 

5,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Small Growth Fund

 

(f)

 

 

1,123

 

 

 

1,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Small Cap

 

(d)

 

 

9,974

 

 

 

9,974

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Fixed Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Fixed Income

 

(g)

 

 

78,886

 

 

 

78,886

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(e)

 

 

36,778

 

 

 

36,778

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

U.S. Inflation Protected Bonds

 

(f)

 

 

403

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

High Yield Bonds

 

(g)

 

 

912

 

 

 

912

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

International Fixed Income

 

(h)

 

 

807

 

 

 

807

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Real Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic Real Estate

 

(h)

 

 

13,870

 

 

 

13,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(i)

 

 

4,204

 

 

 

4,204

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Commodities

 

(i)

 

 

9,789

 

 

 

9,789

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(j)

 

 

2,563

 

 

 

2,563

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Hedge Funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge Funds

 

(j)

 

 

17,941

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,941

 

 

 

 

 

 

(k)

 

 

16,962

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,962

 

 

 

-

 

Master Limited Partnerships

 

(l)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Master Limited Partnerships

 

 

 

 

6,368

 

 

 

6,368

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

 

 

$

173,770

 

 

$

155,829

 

 

$

17,941

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

$

142,088

 

 

$

125,126

 

 

$

16,962

 

 

$

-

 

Fair Value Measurements at(a) A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded, large capitalization companies domiciled predominantly in the U.S.

December 31, 2013 (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices In

 

 

Significant

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Cash

 

 

 

$

1,888

 

 

$

1,888

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Large Cap

 

(a)

 

 

17,380

 

 

 

17,380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Large Core

 

(b)

 

 

7,650

 

 

 

7,650

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Large Value

 

(c)

 

 

7,598

 

 

 

7,598

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emerging Markets

 

(d)

 

 

8,502

 

 

 

8,502

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Small Value Fund

 

(e)

 

 

5,058

 

 

 

5,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Small Growth Fund

 

(f)

 

 

1,211

 

 

 

1,211

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Fixed Income

 

(g)

 

 

69,070

 

 

 

69,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic Real Estate

 

(h)

 

 

11,638

 

 

 

11,638

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodities

 

(i)

 

 

15,246

 

 

 

15,246

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge Funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge Funds

 

(j)

 

 

17,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,009

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

162,250

 

 

$

145,241

 

 

$

17,009

 

 

$

-

 

(a)

A separately managed, diversified portfolio consisting of publically traded large cap stocks. The portfolio is predominately comprised of U.S. companies but may also hold international company stock.

(b)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. TheThis fund invests in publically tradedcommon stocks of companies domiciled in developed market countries outside of the U.S. and includes companies located in emerging market countries.

(c) A daily valued open-ended mutual fund. This fund invests in common stocks of companies domiciled in countries outside of the U.S.

(d)(c)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded companies domiciled in emerging market countries.

(e)(d)

Two daily mutual fund investments with different investment styles (one core, one value, one growth) that invest in publicly traded small capitalization companies. The majority of holdings are domiciled in the U.S. though the funds may hold international stocks.  

(e) Principally consists of a separately managed fixed income portfolio utilized to match the duration of plan liabilities. This liability-driven investment portfolio is comprised of Treasury securities including STRIPS and zero coupon bonds, as well as high quality corporate bonds. Also includes a daily valued mutual fund that invests in publically traded U.S. government, asset-backed, mortgage-backed and corporate fixed-income securities.

(f)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded small capitalization companies that are considered value in style. The majoritybonds backed by the full faith and credit of holdings are domiciled in the U.S. though the fund may hold international stocks.federal government and whose principal is adjusted quarterly based on inflation.

(f)(g)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded, small capitalization companies that are considered growth in style. The majority of holdings are domiciled in the U.S. though the fund may hold international stocks.higher-quality (top-tier BB and B rated) corporate high yield bonds.

(g)(h)

A separately manageddaily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded bonds of governments, agencies and companies domiciled in countries outside of the U.S.

(i)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded REITs. This is an index mutual fund that tracks the Morgan Stanley REIT Index. The fund normally invests at least 98% of assets that are included in the Morgan Stanley REIT Index.

(j)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. This fund combines a commodities position, typically through swap agreements, with a portfolio of inflation indexed bonds and other fixed income portfolio utilizedsecurities. The commodities position is constructed to matchtrack the durationperformance of the Plan’s liabilities. This liability driven investment portfolio is comprised of Treasury securities including STRIPS and zero coupon bonds as well as high quality corporate bonds.Bloomberg Commodity Index.

(h) A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded Real Estate Investment Trusts. This is an index mutual fund that tracks the Morgan Stanley REIT Index. The fund normally invests at least 98% of assets that are included in the Morgan Stanley REIT Index.57

(i) A daily valued mutual fund investment. This fund combines a commodities position, typically through swap agreements, with a portfolio of inflation indexed bonds and other fixed income securities. The commodities position is constructed to track the performance of the Dow Jones UBS Commodity Index.


(j)(k)

ATwo separately managed fundfunds of hedge funds. This fund seeksThese funds seek attractive risk-adjusted returns through investments in a well-diversified group of managers that employ a variety of unique investment strategies. It targetsThey target low volatility and low correlation to traditional asset classes. This fundThese funds may allocate itstheir assets among a select group of non-traditional portfolio managers that invest or trade in a wide range of securities and other instruments, including, but not limited to: equities and fixed income securities, currencies, commodities, futures contracts, options and other derivative instruments.  This

(l) A publically traded, managed fund of master limited partnerships that primarily derives revenue from energy infrastructure assets or activities.

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices In

 

 

Significant

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Cash

 

 

 

$

655

 

 

$

655

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Equity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Large Cap

 

(a)

 

 

23,072

 

 

 

23,072

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

International

 

(b)

 

 

18,211

 

 

 

18,211

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Emerging Markets

 

(c)

 

 

13,127

 

 

 

13,127

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

U.S. Small Cap

 

(d)

 

 

7,256

 

 

 

7,256

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Fixed Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Fixed Income

 

(e)

 

 

59,517

 

 

 

59,517

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

U.S. Inflation Protected Bonds

 

(f)

 

 

1,236

 

 

 

1,236

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

High Yield Bonds

 

(g)

 

 

2,295

 

 

 

2,295

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

International Fixed Income

 

(h)

 

 

2,900

 

 

 

2,900

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Real Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic Real Estate

 

(i)

 

 

10,464

 

 

 

10,464

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Commodities

 

(J)

 

 

7,089

 

 

 

7,089

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Hedge Funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge Funds

 

(k)

 

 

17,155

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

17,155

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

 

 

$

162,977

 

 

$

145,822

 

 

$

17,155

 

 

$

-

 

(a)

A daily valued mutual fund was sold prior to December 31, 2014 butinvestment. The fund invests in publically traded, large capitalization companies domiciled predominantly in the transaction did not settle until January 2015.U.S.


(b)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. This fund invests in common stocks of companies domiciled in developed market countries outside of the U.S.

(c)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded companies domiciled in emerging market countries.

(d)

Three daily mutual fund investments with different investment styles (one core, one value, one growth) that invest in publicly traded small capitalization companies. The majority of holdings are domiciled in the U.S. though the funds may hold international stocks.  

(e)

Principally consists of a separately managed fixed income portfolio utilized to match the duration of plan liabilities. This liability-driven investment portfolio is comprised of Treasury securities including STRIPS and zero coupon bonds, as well as high quality corporate bonds. Also includes a daily valued mutual fund that invests in publically traded U.S. government, asset-backed, mortgage-backed and corporate fixed-income securities.

(f)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded bonds backed by the full faith and credit of the federal government and whose principal is adjusted quarterly based on inflation.

(g)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded, higher-quality (top-tier BB and B rated) corporate high yield bonds.

(h)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded bonds of governments, agencies and companies domiciled in countries outside of the U.S.

(i)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. The fund invests in publically traded REITs. This is an index mutual fund that tracks the Morgan Stanley REIT Index. The fund normally invests at least 98% of assets that are included in the Morgan Stanley REIT Index.

(j)

A daily valued mutual fund investment. This fund combines a commodities position, typically through swap agreements, with a portfolio of inflation indexed bonds and other fixed income securities. The commodities position is constructed to track the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index.

(k)

Two separately managed funds of hedge funds. These funds seek attractive risk-adjusted returns through investments in a well-diversified group of managers that employ a variety of unique investment strategies. They target low volatility and low correlation to traditional asset classes. These funds may allocate their assets among a select group of non-traditional portfolio managers that invest or trade in a wide range of securities and other instruments.

58


Plan Funded Status

The following table sets forth the plans’ funded status as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 (in thousands):

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Funded status of the plan

 

$

(50,316

)

 

$

(20,820

)

 

$

(40,165

)

 

$

(48,412

)

Unrecognized prior service cost

 

 

3,166

 

 

 

1,613

 

 

 

2,574

 

 

 

2,869

 

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

 

 

79,502

 

 

 

53,158

 

 

 

58,957

 

 

 

74,461

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

32,352

 

 

$

33,951

 

 

$

21,366

 

 

$

28,918

 

Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Accrued benefit liability

 

$

(50,316

)

 

$

(20,820

)

 

$

(40,165

)

 

$

(48,412

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

82,668

 

 

 

54,771

 

 

 

61,531

 

 

 

77,330

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

32,352

 

 

$

33,951

 

 

$

21,366

 

 

$

28,918

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 for pension and supplemental benefit plans includes the following components (in thousands):

 

Pension Benefits

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Service cost - benefit earned during the period

 

$

1,069

 

 

$

1,479

 

 

$

962

 

 

$

1,269

 

 

$

1,495

 

 

$

1,069

 

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

 

 

8,960

 

 

 

8,379

 

 

 

8,417

 

 

 

8,073

 

 

 

8,997

 

 

 

8,960

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(10,286

)

 

 

(11,338

)

 

 

(10,005

)

 

 

(9,730

)

 

 

(11,217

)

 

 

(10,286

)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

182

 

 

 

192

 

 

 

176

 

 

 

295

 

 

 

296

 

 

 

182

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

3,674

 

 

 

5,741

 

 

 

6,194

 

 

 

5,134

 

 

 

5,862

 

 

 

3,674

 

Settlements

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Net periodic pension cost

 

$

3,599

 

 

$

4,453

 

 

$

5,744

 

 

$

17,551

 

 

$

5,433

 

 

$

3,599

 

The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into the net periodic benefit cost during 20152017 are approximately $5.8$4.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Assumptions Used

The following tables summarize the Company’s actuarial assumptions for discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, and rates of increase in compensation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:assets:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Pension plan assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assumed discount rate, general

 

 

4.09%

 

 

 

4.95%

 

 

 

4.30%

 

 

 

4.18%

 

 

 

4.52%

 

 

 

4.09%

 

Assumed discount rate, union

 

 

4.16%

 

 

 

5.10%

 

 

 

4.45%

 

 

 

4.22%

 

 

 

4.55%

 

 

 

4.16%

 

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, general

 

 

6.30%

 

 

 

7.30%

 

 

 

7.75%

 

 

 

6.30%

 

 

 

6.50%

 

 

 

6.30%

 

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, union

 

 

7.30%

 

 

 

7.75%

 

 

 

7.75%

 

 

 

6.20%

 

 

 

6.30%

 

 

 

7.30%

 

To select the appropriate actuarial assumptions, management relied on current market conditions, historical information and consultation with and input from the Company’s outside actuaries. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption is based on historical returns and the future expectation of returns for each asset category, as well as the target asset allocation of the asset portfolio. There was no rate of compensation increase in each of the past three fiscal years.

Contributions

On December 10, 2014In February 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a $2 million cash contributioncontributions to the Company’s pension plans, totaling $5.0 million to the Essendant Union pension plan which was funded in January 2015.Employee Pension Plan and $5.0 million to the Essendant Pension Plan. Additional fundings, if any, for 20152017 have not yet been determined.


59


Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The estimated future benefit payments under the Company’s pension plans, excluding the impact of future lump sum offerings, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Amounts

 

 

Amounts

 

2015

 

$

6,130

 

2016

 

 

7,376

 

2017

 

 

7,951

 

 

$

9,198

 

2018

 

 

8,117

 

 

 

7,984

 

2019

 

 

9,165

 

 

 

8,833

 

2020-2024

 

 

55,313

 

2020

 

 

9,292

 

2021

 

 

9,027

 

2022-2026

 

 

50,839

 

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company has a defined contribution plan. Salaried associates and non-union hourly paid associates are eligible to participate after completing six consecutive months of employment. The plan permits associates to have contributions made as 401(k) salary deferrals on their behalf, or as voluntary after-tax contributions, and provides for Company contributions, or contributions matching associates’ salary deferral contributions, at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Expense associated with the Company contributions to match associates’ contributions were approximately $7.1 million, $5.9 million and $5.5 million $5.3 millionin 2016, 2015 and $5.3 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

12.14. Preferred Stock

USI’sESND’s authorized capital shares include 15 million shares of preferred stock. The rights and preferences of preferred stock are established by USI’sESND’s Board of Directors upon issuance. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013, USI2015, ESND had no preferred stock outstanding and all 15 million shares are classified as undesignated preferred stock.

 

13.15. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Currently Payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

73,319

 

 

$

70,234

 

 

$

65,835

 

 

$

34,867

 

 

$

67,702

 

 

$

72,513

 

State

 

 

8,333

 

 

 

8,027

 

 

 

6,683

 

 

 

5,255

 

 

 

8,387

 

 

 

8,334

 

Foreign

 

 

1,305

 

 

 

1,614

 

 

 

805

 

Total currently payable

 

 

81,652

 

 

 

78,261

 

 

 

72,518

 

 

 

41,427

 

 

 

77,703

 

 

 

81,652

 

Deferred, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(5,736

)

 

 

(3,891

)

 

 

(5,790

)

 

 

(9,554

)

 

 

(20,929

)

 

 

(9,510

)

State

 

 

(631

)

 

 

(30

)

 

 

(923

)

 

 

(779

)

 

 

(1,778

)

 

 

(1,085

)

Foreign

 

 

(291

)

 

 

(455

)

 

 

(284

)

Total deferred, net

 

 

(6,367

)

 

 

(3,921

)

 

 

(6,713

)

 

 

(10,624

)

 

 

(23,162

)

 

 

(10,879

)

Provision for income taxes

 

$

75,285

 

 

$

74,340

 

 

$

65,805

 

 

$

30,803

 

 

$

54,541

 

 

$

70,773

 


The Company’s effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 varied from the statutory federal income tax rate as set forth in the following table (in thousands):

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Pre-tax Income

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Pre-tax Income

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Pre-tax Income

 

Tax provision based on the federal statutory rate

 

$

33,130

 

 

 

35.0

%

 

$

3,569

 

 

 

35.0

%

 

$

64,011

 

 

 

35.0

%

State and local income taxes—net of federal income tax benefit

 

 

2,639

 

 

 

2.8

%

 

 

374

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

4,362

 

 

 

2.4

%

Impairment of goodwill

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

47,468

 

 

 

465.5

%

 

 

(4

)

 

 

-

 

Valuation allowances

 

 

(4,265

)

 

 

-4.5

%

 

 

1,217

 

 

 

11.9

%

 

 

3,027

 

 

 

1.7

%

Tax effects of foreign dividend payments

 

 

1,756

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Research and Development tax credit

 

 

(1,237

)

 

 

-1.3

%

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Non-deductible and other

 

 

(1,220

)

 

 

-1.3

%

 

 

1,913

 

 

 

18.8

%

 

 

(623

)

 

 

-0.4

%

Provision for income taxes

 

$

30,803

 

 

 

32.5

%

 

$

54,541

 

 

 

534.8

%

 

$

70,773

 

 

 

38.7

%

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Pre-tax Income

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Pre-tax Income

 

 

Amount

 

 

% of Pre-tax Income

 

Tax provision based on the federal statutory rate

 

$

68,070

 

 

 

35.0

%

 

$

69,128

 

 

 

35.0

%

 

$

62,172

 

 

 

35.0

%

State and local income taxes—net of federal income tax benefit

 

 

4,816

 

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

5,292

 

 

 

2.6

%

 

 

3,464

 

 

 

2.0

%

Change in tax reserves and accrual adjustments

 

 

(115

)

 

 

(0.1

%)

 

 

(69

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(521

)

 

 

(0.4

%)

Non-deductible and other

 

 

2,514

 

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

(11

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

690

 

 

 

0.4

%

Provision for income taxes

 

$

75,285

 

 

 

38.7

%

 

$

74,340

 

 

 

37.6

%

 

$

65,805

 

 

 

37.0

%


61


The deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted from temporary differences in the recognition of certain items for financial and tax accounting purposes. The sources of these differences and the related tax effects were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Assets

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Assets

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Assets

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Assets

 

 

Liabilities

 

Accrued expenses

 

$

12,299

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

14,615

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

16,742

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

14,287

 

 

$

-

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

7,452

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,815

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

15,155

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,355

 

 

 

-

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

-

 

 

 

26,816

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

28,282

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20,643

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

24,362

 

Intangibles arising from acquisitions

 

 

-

 

 

 

22,184

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

23,689

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

22,600

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

25,034

 

Inventory reserves and adjustments

 

 

-

 

 

 

28,092

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

28,783

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

17,900

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16,086

 

Pension and post-retirement

 

 

18,797

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,319

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11,700

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,889

 

 

 

-

 

Interest rate swap

 

 

-

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

591

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

5,653

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,750

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,627

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,721

 

 

 

-

 

Income tax credits, capital losses, and net operating losses

 

 

12,550

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,539

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,790

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,462

 

 

 

-

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

273

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,930

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,288

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,442

 

 

 

-

 

Other

 

 

819

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

921

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,026

 

 

 

-

 

Total Deferred

 

 

57,843

 

 

 

77,303

 

 

 

43,344

 

 

 

81,345

 

 

 

63,223

 

 

 

61,143

 

 

 

66,182

 

 

 

65,482

 

Valuation Allowance

 

 

(7,397

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,791

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(5,035

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(9,189

)

 

 

-

 

Net Deferred

 

$

50,446

 

 

$

77,303

 

 

$

40,553

 

 

$

81,345

 

 

$

58,188

 

 

$

61,143

 

 

$

56,993

 

 

$

65,482

 

In the Consolidated Balance Sheets, these deferred assets and liabilities were classified on a net basis as current and non-current, based on the classification of the related asset or liability or the expected reversal date of the temporary difference.

Valuation allowances principally relate to federal capital loss carryovers, state tax credits, and net operating losses. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company has a capital loss carryforward of $10.2 million that expires in 2019.  The Company also has state tax credit carryforwards of $9.1$10.8 million that expire by 2019 and2021, state net operating loss carryforwards of $0.9$0.6 million that expire by 2033.2033, and acquired federal net operating losses of $5.8 million that expire by 2034.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

At December 31, 2014, the gross unrecognized tax benefits were $3.2 million. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had $3.1 million in gross unrecognized tax benefits. The following table shows the changes in gross unrecognized tax benefits, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 (in thousands):

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Beginning Balance, January 1

 

$

3,108

 

 

$

3,134

 

 

$

3,374

 

 

$

3,350

 

 

$

3,205

 

 

$

3,108

 

Additions based on tax positions taken during a prior period

 

 

123

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

713

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

123

 

Reductions based on tax positions taken during a prior period

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(11

)

Additions based on tax positions taken during the current period

 

 

382

 

 

 

389

 

 

 

451

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

425

 

 

 

382

 

Reductions related to settlement of tax matters

 

 

(70

)

 

 

(184

)

 

 

(490

)

 

 

(52

)

 

 

(46

)

 

 

(70

)

Reductions related to lapses of applicable statutes of limitation

 

 

(327

)

 

 

(395

)

 

 

(498

)

 

 

(252

)

 

 

(221

)

 

 

(327

)

Ending Balance, December 31

 

$

3,205

 

 

$

3,108

 

 

$

3,134

 

 

$

3,830

 

 

$

3,350

 

 

$

3,205

 

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate are $2.1$2.6 million, $2.0$2.2 million, and $2.0$2.1 million, respectively.

The Company recognizes net interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The gross amount of interest and penalties reflected in the Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 were zero, zero, and income of$0.3 million, $0.1 million, and zero, respectively. The Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 include $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, accrued for the potential payment of interest and penalties.

As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company’s U.S. Federal income tax returns for 20112013 and subsequent years remainremains subject to examination by tax authorities. In addition, the Company’s state income tax returns for the 20072008 and subsequent tax years remain subject to examinationsexamination by state and local income tax authorities. Although theThe Company is not currently under examination by the


IRS and a number of state and local examinations are currently ongoing. Due to the potential for resolution of ongoing examinations and the expiration of various statutes of limitation, it is reasonably possible that the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $1.0$1.3 million.

 

62


14. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

In addition to the information provided in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the following are supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

 

Years Ended December 31

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash Paid During the Year For:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

$

12,822

 

 

$

12,385

 

 

$

22,563

 

Income taxes, net

 

76,205

 

 

 

79,526

 

 

 

53,053

 

15. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments approximates their net carrying values. The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of  December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

20,812

 

 

$

20,812

 

 

$

22,326

 

 

$

22,326

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

702,527

 

 

 

702,527

 

 

 

643,379

 

 

 

643,379

 

Convertible note receivable

 

 

6,775

 

 

 

6,775

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Non-convertible note receivable

 

 

2,800

 

 

 

2,800

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Accounts payable

 

 

485,241

 

 

 

485,241

 

 

 

476,113

 

 

 

476,113

 

Debt

 

 

713,909

 

 

 

713,909

 

 

 

533,697

 

 

 

533,697

 

Long-term interest rate swap liability

 

 

253

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Long-term interest rate swap asset

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

599

 

 

 

599

 

The fair value of the interest rate swaps is estimated based upon the amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements as of December 31 of each year. See Note 17, “Derivative Financial Instruments”, for further information.

The convertible and non-convertible notes disclosed above were part of the consideration received in the sale of MBS Dev in the fourth quarter of 2014.  Both have maturity dates of December 16, 2019. The convertible note is convertible upon the discretion of the Company and can be converted into common units of a privately held company. Both notes are carried at fair market value. See Note 18 “Fair Value Measurements” for additional information.


16. Other Assets and Liabilities

Other assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of  December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Other Long-Term Assets, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Long-Term Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in deferred compensation

 

$

4,984

 

 

$

4,408

 

 

$

4,776

 

 

$

5,440

 

Long-term prepaid assets

 

 

19,055

 

 

 

14,063

 

 

 

34,307

 

 

 

26,291

 

Long-term convertible and non-convertible notes receivable

 

 

9,575

 

 

 

-

 

Capitalized financing costs

 

 

3,141

 

 

 

3,391

 

Long-term swap asset

 

 

-

 

 

 

599

 

Long-term income tax asset

 

 

2,881

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,423

 

 

 

3,412

 

Other

 

 

2,174

 

 

 

3,115

 

 

 

2,703

 

 

 

2,205

 

Total other long-term assets, net

 

$

41,810

 

 

$

25,576

 

Total other long-term assets

 

$

45,209

 

 

$

37,348

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued pension obligation

 

$

50,316

 

 

$

20,820

 

 

$

40,165

 

 

$

48,412

 

Deferred rent

 

 

16,241

 

 

 

18,654

 

 

 

22,561

 

 

 

18,948

 

Deferred directors compensation

 

 

5,016

 

 

 

4,412

 

 

 

4,786

 

 

 

5,453

 

Long-term swap liability

 

 

253

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

469

 

Long-term income tax liability

 

 

3,639

 

 

 

3,482

 

 

 

3,999

 

 

 

3,832

 

Long-term merger expenses

 

 

17,229

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

1,812

 

 

 

12,965

 

Long-term workers compensation liability

 

 

7,155

 

 

 

6,876

 

 

 

9,517

 

 

 

8,039

 

Other

 

 

4,545

 

 

 

5,345

 

 

 

1,602

 

 

 

3,370

 

Total other long-term liabilities

 

$

104,394

 

 

$

59,787

 

 

$

84,647

 

 

$

101,488

 

 

17. Derivative Financial Instruments

Interest rate movements create a degree of risk to the Company’s operations by affecting the amount of interest payments. Interest rate swap agreements are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate changes. The Company designates its floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the variability of future cash flows at the inception of the swap contract to support hedge accounting.

USSC has entered into swap transactions to mitigate USSC’s floating rate risk on the noted aggregate notional amount of LIBOR-based interest rate risk noted in the table below. These swap transactions occurred as follows:

·

On November 6, 2007, USSC entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the “November 2007 Swap Transaction”) with U.S. Bank National Association as the counterparty. This swap transaction matured on January 15, 2013.

·

On July 18, 2012, USSC entered into a two-year forward, three-year interest rate swap transaction (the “July 2012 Swap Transaction”) with U.S. Bank National Association as the counterparty. The swap transaction has an effective date of July 18, 2014 and a maturity date of July 18, 2017.

·

On June 11, 2013, USSC entered into a seven-month forward, seven-year interest rate swap transaction (the “June 2013 Swap Transaction”) with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank as the counterparty. The swap transaction has an effective date of January 15, 2014 and a maturity date of January 15, 2021. This swap was terminated in October 2013.

Approximately 42% of the Company’s current outstanding debt had its interest payments designated as the hedged forecasted transactions as of December 31, 2014.


The Company’s outstanding swap transaction is accounted for as cash flow hedge and is recorded at fair value on the statement of financial position as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. This hedge was as follows (in thousands):

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Net

 

As of December 31, 2014

Amount

 

 

Receive

 

Pay

 

 

Maturity Date

 

Liability (1)

 

July 2012 Swap Transaction

$

150,000

 

 

Floating 1-month LIBOR

 

 

1.05%

 

 

July 18, 2017

 

$

253

 

(1)

This interest rate derivative qualifies for hedge accounting and is in a net liability position. Therefore, the fair value of the interest rate derivative is included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Other Long-Term Liabilities”, with an offsetting component in “Stockholders’ Equity” as part of “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss”.

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Net

 

As of December 31, 2013

Amount

 

 

Receive

 

Pay

 

 

Maturity Date

 

Asset (1)

 

July 2012 Swap Transaction

$

150,000

 

 

Floating 1-month LIBOR

 

 

1.05%

 

 

July 18, 2017

 

$

599

 

(1)

This interest rate derivative qualifies for hedge accounting and is in a net asset position. Therefore, the fair value of the interest rate derivative included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Other Long-Term Assets” with an offsetting component in “Stockholders’ Equity” as part of “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss”.

Under the terms of the July 2012 Swap Transaction, USSC is required to make monthly fixed rate payments to the counterparty calculated based on the notional amounts noted in the table above at a fixed rate also noted in the table above, while the counterparty will be obligated to make monthly floating rate payments to USSC based on the one-month LIBOR on the same referenced notional amount.

The hedged transaction described above qualifies as a cash flow hedge in accordance with accounting guidance on derivative instruments. This guidance requires companies to recognize all of their derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position at fair value. The Company does not offset fair value amounts recognized for interest rate swaps executed with the same counterparty.

In connection with the pricing of the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement, discussed in Note 9 “Debt”, the Company terminated the June 2013 Swap Transaction. The gain of $0.9 million realized by the Company on the termination was recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and is being reclassified into earnings over the term of the 2014 Notes. During 2014, $0.1M was reclassified into earnings. Within the next 12 months, $0.1M will be recognized in earnings. This swap reduced the exposure to variability in interest rates between the date the Company entered into the hedge and the pricing of the 2014 Notes by the Company.

The July 2012 Swap Transaction effectively converts a portion of the Company’s future floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis. This swap transaction reduces the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. By using such derivative financial instruments, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to the interest rate swap (as noted above) will fail to perform under the terms of the agreement. The Company attempts to minimize the credit risk in these agreements by only entering into transactions with counterparties the Company determines are creditworthy. The market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a derivative financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates.

The Company’s agreement with its derivative counterparty provides that if an event of default occurs on any Company debt of $25 million or more, the counterparty can terminate the swap agreement. If an event of default had occurred and the counterparty had exercised their early termination right under the outstanding swap transaction as of December 31, 2014, the Company would have been obligated to pay the aggregate fair value net liability of $0.3 million plus accrued interest to the counterparty.

The swap transaction that was in effect as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 contained no ineffectiveness; therefore, all gains or losses on that derivative instrument were reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings as “interest expense” in the same period or periods during which they affected earnings. The following table depicts the effect of these derivative instruments on the statements of income and comprehensive income for years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.


 

Amount of Gain (Loss)

Recognized in

OCI on Derivative

(Effective Portion)

 

 

Location of Gain (Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated OCI into

Income (Effective

Portion)

 

Amount of Gain (Loss)

Reclassified

from Accumulated OCI into Income

(Effective Portion)

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

November 2007 Swap Transaction

$

-

 

 

$

(77

)

 

   Interest expense, net

 

$

-

 

 

$

(228

)

   July 2012 Swap Transaction

 

105

 

 

 

864

 

 

   Interest expense, net

 

 

625

 

 

 

-

 

June 2013 Swap Transaction

 

-

 

 

 

569

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

18. Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities, including interest rate swaps, at fair value on a recurring basis, including certain note receivables and interest rate swap liabilities related to interest rate swap derivatives based on the mark-to-market positionmarket rates of the Company’s interest rate swap positions and other observable interest rates (see Note 17, “Derivative Financial Instruments”, for more information on theserates. The fair value of the interest rate swaps).swaps is determined by using quoted market forward rates (level 2 inputs) and reflects the present value of the amount the Company would pay for contracts involving the same notional amount and maturity date.

FASB accountingAccounting guidance on fair value establishes a hierarchy for those instruments measured at fair value which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

·

Level 1—Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 1—Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

·

Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

·

Level 3—Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions developed by the Company which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions developed by the Company which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter.  The following table summarizes the financial instruments measured at fair value in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

 

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Market

Prices in Active

Markets for

Identical Assets  or

Liabilities

 

 

Significant Other

Observable

Inputs

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible note receivable

$

6,775

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

6,775

 

Non-convertible note receivable

 

2,800

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,800

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap liability

 

253

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

-

 

Total

$

9,828

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

253

 

 

$

9,575

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Market

Prices in Active

Markets for

Identical Assets  or

Liabilities

 

 

Significant Other

Observable

Inputs

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap asset

$

599

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

599

 

 

$

-

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Market

Prices in Active

Markets for

Identical Assets or

Liabilities

 

 

Significant Other

Observable

Inputs

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange hedge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- as of December 31, 2015

$

91

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

91

 

 

$

-

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- as of December 31, 2016

$

205

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

205

 

 

$

-

 

- as of December 31, 2015

$

469

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

469

 

 

$

-

 

 

63


The carrying amount of accounts receivable at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, including $360.3$500.3 million and $355.4$448.6 million, respectively, of receivables sold under the Current Receivables Securitization Program, approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of this item.


The notes above were obtained as part of the consideration received from the sale of MBS Dev in December 2014. Both have maturity dates of December 16, 2019. The convertible note can be converted into common units of a privately held company at the Company’s discretion. Both notes are carried at fair market value, which is revalued quarterly. The non-convertible promissory note was valued using a discounted cash flow analysis with a rate typical for investments in similar-sized companies.  The convertible subordinated promissory note was additionally valued using an option pricing model. This method values the conversion feature by using the price paid per share by the most recent, third-party investor.

FASB accounting guidance on fair value measurements requires separate disclosure of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as noted above, from those measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. As of December 31, 2014,2016, no assets or liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

 

18.  Legal Matters

The Company has been named as a defendant in two lawsuits alleging that the Company sent unsolicited fax advertisements to the named plaintiffs, as well as other persons and entities, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, as amended by the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005 ("TCPA"). One lawsuit was initially filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on May 1, 2015, and subsequently refiled in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The other lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on January 14, 2016. The two lawsuits have since been consolidated for discovery, and assigned to the same judge.  Plaintiffs in both lawsuits seek certification of a class of plaintiffs comprised of persons and entities who allegedly received fax advertisements from the Company. Under the TCPA, recipients of unsolicited fax advertisements can seek damages of $500 per fax for inadvertent violations and up to $1,500 per fax for knowing and willful violations.  Other reported TCPA lawsuits have resulted in a broad range of outcomes, with each case being dependent on its own unique set of facts and circumstances. In each lawsuit, the Company is vigorously contesting class certification and denies that any violations occurred.  

Litigation of this kind is likely to lead to settlement negotiations, including negotiations prompted by pre-trial civil court procedures.  Regardless of whether the lawsuits are resolved at trial or through settlement, the Company believes that a loss associated with resolution of pending claims is probable. The Company has recorded a $4.0 million, pre-tax reserve within the warehousing, marketing and administrative expenses line item in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company is continuing to evaluate its defenses based on its internal review and investigation of prior events, new information and future circumstances. Final disposition of the lawsuits, whether through settlement or through trial, may result in a loss materially in excess of the recorded amount. However, a range of reasonably possible losses is not estimable at this time.  

The Company is also involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of or incidental to its business. The Company has established reserves, which are not material, for potential losses that are probable and reasonably estimable that may result from those proceedings. In many cases, however, it is difficult to determine whether a loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, particularly where proceedings may be in relatively early stages or where plaintiffs are seeking substantial or indeterminate damages. Matters frequently need to be more developed before a loss or range of loss can reasonably be estimated. The Company believes that such ordinary course legal proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect upon its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

19. Selected Quarterly Financial Data—Unaudited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

Total(1)

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Year Ended December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,254,139

 

 

$

1,320,037

 

 

$

1,419,947

 

 

$

1,333,082

 

 

$

5,327,205

 

Gross profit

 

 

187,083

 

 

 

199,460

 

 

 

211,028

 

 

 

212,930

 

 

$

810,501

 

Net income(2)

 

 

21,857

 

 

 

33,331

 

 

 

38,169

 

 

 

25,841

 

 

$

119,198

 

Net income per share—basic

 

$

0.56

 

 

$

0.86

 

 

$

0.99

 

 

$

0.67

 

 

$

3.08

 

Net income per share—diluted

 

$

0.55

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

$

0.98

 

 

$

0.67

 

 

$

3.05

 

Year Ended December 31, 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,250,485

 

 

$

1,274,494

 

 

$

1,336,676

 

 

$

1,223,638

 

 

$

5,085,293

 

Gross profit

 

 

188,525

 

 

 

201,936

 

 

 

203,661

 

 

 

195,456

 

 

 

789,578

 

Net income(3)

 

 

13,874

 

 

 

34,670

 

 

 

40,501

 

 

 

34,125

 

 

 

123,170

 

Net income per share—basic

 

$

0.35

 

 

$

0.87

 

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

0.86

 

 

$

3.11

 

Net income per share—diluted

 

$

0.34

 

 

$

0.86

 

 

$

1.01

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

$

3.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

Total(1)

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,352,296

 

 

$

1,354,523

 

 

$

1,407,504

 

 

$

1,254,699

 

 

$

5,369,022

 

Gross profit

 

 

200,082

 

 

 

195,823

 

 

 

198,854

 

 

 

165,102

 

 

 

759,861

 

Net income (loss)(2)

 

 

16,530

 

 

 

12,933

 

 

 

36,742

 

 

 

(2,353

)

 

 

63,852

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

0.35

 

 

$

1.00

 

 

$

(0.06

)

 

$

1.75

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted(3)

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

0.35

 

 

$

0.99

 

 

$

(0.06

)

 

$

1.73

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,332,375

 

 

$

1,341,799

 

 

$

1,391,545

 

 

$

1,297,327

 

 

$

5,363,046

 

Gross profit

 

 

200,395

 

 

 

210,119

 

 

 

225,143

 

 

 

200,838

 

 

 

836,495

 

Net income (loss)(4)

 

 

(6,007

)

 

 

29,834

 

 

 

27,667

 

 

 

(95,836

)

 

 

(44,342

)

Net income (loss) per share—basic

 

$

(0.16

)

 

$

0.79

 

 

$

0.74

 

 

$

(2.61

)

 

$

(1.18

)

Net income (loss) per share—diluted(3)

 

$

(0.16

)

 

$

0.78

 

 

$

0.74

 

 

$

(2.61

)

 

$

(1.18

)

 

 

(1) As a result of changes in the number of common and common equivalent shares during the year, the sum of quarterly earnings per share will not necessarily equal earnings per share for the total year.

64


(2) 2014 results were impacted by a loss on disposition of MBS Dev totaling $8.2 million or $0.21 per diluted share in the fourth quarter. This loss was not fully recognizable for tax.

(3) 20132016 results were impacted by the effectsfollowing items, net of taxes:

 

 

2016 factors

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Gain on sale of City of Industry facility

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

(17,752

)

 

$

(1,651

)

 

$

(19,403

)

Settlement charge related to the defined benefit plan

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,328

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

216

 

 

 

7,805

 

Litigation reserve

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,492

 

 

 

2,492

 

Severance costs for operating leadership

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

776

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

776

 

State income tax reserve adjustment

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

417

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

155

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(754

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(599

)

Tax impact of a dividend from a foreign subsidiary

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,666

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,666

 

(3) As a $13.0 million or $0.20 per diluted share workforce reduction and facility closure chargeresult of the net loss in the first quarter,quarters ended December 31, 2016, March 31, 2015 and a non-tax deductible $1.2 million or $0.03December 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2015, the effect of potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive and have been omitted from the calculation of diluted earnings per diluted share, asset impairment charge inconsistent with GAAP.

(4) 2015 results were impacted by the fourth quarter.following items, net of taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Impairment of Industrial goodwill and intangible assets

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

118,076

 

 

$

118,076

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

3,989

 

 

 

(86

)

 

 

124

 

 

 

7,489

 

 

 

11,516

 

Loss on disposition of business and related costs

 

 

13,420

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

2,918

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

17,048

 

Impairment of assets and accelerated amortization related to rebranding

 

 

6,487

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

7,429

 

Impairment of seller notes

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,658

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,658

 

 

 

 


65


ITEMITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

The Registrant had no disagreements on accounting and financial disclosure of the type referred to in Item 304 of Regulation S-K.

 

ITEMITEM  9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Attached as exhibits to this Annual Report are certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act. This “Controls and Procedures” section includes information concerning the controls and controls evaluation referred to in such certifications. It should be read in conjunction with the reports of the Company’s management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the report thereon of Ernst & Young LLP referred to below.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon our evaluation, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with or submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act is made known to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the final quarter of 2014,2016, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Related Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, regarding its audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

ITEM   9B.   OTHER INFORMATION.

 


Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.

On February 22, 2017, ESND and ECO entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) among ESND, ECO, ECO’s United States’ subsidiaries as guarantors (ESND, ECO and the subsidiary guarantors collectively referred to as the “Loan Parties”), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other lenders identified therein.  The Credit Agreement amends and restates the Fourth Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 9, 2013 (as amended prior to February 22, 2017, the “Prior Agreement”). Also on February 22, 2017, ESND, ECO and the holders of ECO’s 3.75% senior secured notes due January 15, 2021, (the “Notes”) entered into Amendment No. 4 (“Amendment No. 4”) to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 25, 2013, (as amended prior to February 22, 2017, the “Note Purchase Agreement”).

The Credit Agreement and Amendment No. 4 eliminated covenants in the Prior Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement that prohibited the Company from exceeding a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 (or 4.0 to 1.0 following certain permitted acquisitions) and restricted the Company’s ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock when the ratio was 3.0 to 1.0 or more. As a result, the Company is no longer subject to a debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility with an aggregate committed principal amount of $1.0 billion, a FILO revolving (first-in-last-out) credit facility with an aggregate committed principal amount of $100.0 million, and a term loan with an aggregate committed principal amount of $77.6 million (which term loan may be funded in a single funding on or prior to April 21, 2017). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, ECO may seek additional commitments to increase the aggregate committed principal amount thereunder to a total amount of $1.678 billion.

Principal under the revolving and FILO credit facilities is due in full on February 22, 2022, compared to July 6, 2018 under the Prior Agreement.  Principal under the term loan (if drawn) is due in monthly installments, with any remaining principal due on February 22, 2022.

66


PARTThe Credit Agreement also provides for the issuance of letters of credit. The letters of credit governed by the Credit Agreement include a $165.0 million letter of credit as collateral support for obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement.  Pursuant to Amendment No. 4, the noteholders agreed to accept the $165.0 million letter of credit in exchange for the noteholders’ release of their liens on the Loan Parties’ assets and the removal of the debt-to-EBITDA ratio covenant from the Note Purchase Agreement. Letters of credit issued pursuant to the 2017 Credit Agreement incur interest based on the applicable margin rate for LIBOR-based loans, plus 0.125%. Based on the Company’s borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement as of February 22, 2017, the annual cost of the noteholders’ letter of credit will be approximately $2.7 million.

Amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Registrant and its U.S. subsidiaries, including owned real property.  Borrowings under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at LIBOR for specified interest periods, at the REVLIBOR30 Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) or at the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement), plus, in each case, a margin determined based on the average quarterly revolving availability calculated as provided in the Credit Agreement. Depending on such average quarterly revolving availability, the margin on LIBOR-based loans ranges from 1.25% to 1.75% for revolving and term loans and 2.00% to 2.50% for FILO loans, and the margin on Alternate Base Rate loans ranges from 0.25% to 0.75% for revolving and term loans and 1.00% to 1.50% for FILO loans. From the effective date of the Credit Agreement to but excluding July 1, 2017, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans is 1.50% for revolving and term loans and 2.25% for FILO loans, and the applicable margin for Alternate Base Rate loans is 0.50% for revolving and term loans and 1.25% for FILO loans.  In addition, ECO is required to pay the lenders a commitment fee on the unutilized portion of the revolving commitments and FILO commitments under the Credit Agreement at a rate per annum equal to 0.25%. The Company can borrow up to $100.0 million of swingline loans on a revolving basis; swingline loans are considered to be unutilized for purposes of the commitment fee.

Availability under the revolving credit facility is subject to a revolving borrowing base (calculated as set forth in the Credit Agreement) comprised of a certain percentage of the eligible accounts receivable of the Loan Parties, plus a certain percentage of the eligible inventory of the Loan Parties, minus reserves. Similarly, availability under the FILO revolving credit facility is subject to a FILO borrowing base (calculated as set forth in the Credit Agreement) comprised primarily of 10% of the eligible accounts receivable of the Loan Parties, plus 10% multiplied by the net orderly liquidation value percentages of the eligible inventory of the Loan Parties, minus reserves.

The 2017 Credit Agreement contains representations and warranties, covenants and events of default that are customary for facilities of this type, including covenants to deliver periodic certifications setting forth the revolving borrowing base and the FILO borrowing base. So long as the Payment Conditions (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement) are satisfied, the Loan Parties may pay dividends, repurchase stock and engage in certain permitted acquisitions, investments, dispositions and restricted payments, in each case subject to the other terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement and the other loan documents.

Also in connection with the Credit Agreement, the Loan Parties entered into a Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of February 22, 2017, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Security Agreement”), under which the Loan Parties granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets to secure the payment and performance of their obligations under the Credit Agreement. The Security Agreement amends and restates the Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of October 15, 2007.

The foregoing descriptions of the Credit Agreement, the Security Agreement and Amendment No. 4 are not complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Credit Agreement, the Security Agreement and Amendment No. 4, which the Registrant intends to file as exhibits to its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2017.

Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.

The information with respect to the Credit Agreement provided above is hereby incorporated by reference.

Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement.

In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, ECO repaid the indebtedness outstanding under the Transfer and Administration Agreement dated March 3, 2009, as amended, and terminated the Transfer and Administration Agreement, pursuant to which ECO had previously borrowed $200.0 million, secured by ECO’s accounts receivable.

67


PART III

 

 

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

For information about the Company’s executive officers, see “Executive Officers of the Registrant” included as Item 4Ain Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, the information contained under the captions “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” and “Voting Securities and Principal Holders—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in USI’sESND’s Proxy Statement for its 20152017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“20152017 Proxy Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required by Item 10 regarding the Audit Committee’s composition and the presence of an “audit committee financial expert” is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the captions “Governance and Board Matters—Board Committees—General” and “—Audit Committee” in USI’s 2014ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement. In addition, information regarding delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in USI’s 2015ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement.

The Company has adopted a code of ethics (its “Code of Business Conduct”) that applies to all directors, officers and associates, including the Company’s CEO, CFO and Controller, and other executive officers identified pursuant to this Item 10. A copy of this Code of Business Conduct is available on the Company’s Web sitewebsite at www.unitedstationers.comwww.Essendant.com. The Company intends to disclose any significant amendments to and waivers of its Code of Conduct by posting the required information at this Web sitewebsite within the required time periods.

 

 

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the captions “Director Compensation”, “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in USI’s 2015ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement.

 

 

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The beneficial ownership information required to be furnished pursuant to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the captions “Voting Securities and Principal Holders—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Voting Securities and Principal Holders—Security Ownership of Management” in USI’s 2014ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement. Information relating to securities authorized for issuance under United’sEssendant’s equity plans is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in USI’s 2015ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement.

 

 

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in USI’s 2015ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement.

 

 

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the captions “Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accountants—Accounting Firm—Fee Information” and “—Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy” in USI’s 2015ESND’s 2017 Proxy Statement.

 

 

 


68


PARTPART IV

 

 

ITEM  15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)

The following financial statements, schedules and exhibits are filed as part of this report:

 

 

 

 

Page No.

(1)

 

Financial Statements of the Company:

 

 

 

 

Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

2628

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

2729

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

2830

 

 

Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014

 

2931

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014

 

3032

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015

 

3133

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013
2016, 2015
and 20122014

 

3234

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014

 

3335

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

3436

(2)

 

Financial Statement Schedule:

 

 

 

 

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 

7074

 

 

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

 

 

(3)

 

Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

 

 

 

 

 


69


The Company is including as exhibits to this Annual Report certain documents that it has previously filed with the SEC as exhibits, and it is incorporating such documents as exhibits herein by reference from the respective filings identified in parentheses at the end of the exhibit descriptions. Except where otherwise indicated, the identified SEC filings from which such exhibits are incorporated by reference were made by the Company (under USI’sESND’s file number of 0-10653). The management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements required to be included as exhibits to this Annual Report pursuant to Item 15(b) are listed below as Exhibits 10.1910.24 through 10.37,10.52, and each of them is marked with a double asterisk at the end of the related exhibit description.

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

  2.1

Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 22, 2012, among the Stockholders of O.K.I. Supply Co. and United Stationers Supply Co. (“USSC”) (Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 25, 2012)

3.1

  

SecondThird Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United Stationers,Essendant Inc. (“USI”ESND” or the “Company”), dated as of March 19, 2002June 1, 2015 (Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q, filed on July 23,2015)

  3.2

  

Amended and Restated Bylaws of United StationersEssendant Inc., dated as of July 21, 2014December 13, 2016 (Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 24, 2014)December 16, 2016)

  4.1

  

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2013, among USI, USSC,ESND, Essendant Co. (ECO), and the note purchasers identified therein (the “2013 Note Purchase Agreement”) (Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 19, 2014 (the “2013 Form 10-K”))

  4.2

  

Amendment No. 2 to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2016, among ESND, ECO, and the note purchasers identified therein (Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)

  4.3

Parent Guaranty, dated as of November 25, 2013, by USIESND in favor of the holders of the promissory notes identified therein (Exhibit 4.5 to the 2013 Form 10-K)

  4.34.4

 

Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of November 25, 2013, by all of the domestic subsidiaries of USSCECO (Exhibit 4.6 to the 2013 Form 10-K)

10.1

  

Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of July 8, 2013, executed by USIESND and its subsidiaries United StationersEssendant Management Services LLC (“USMS”EMS”), United StationersEssendant Financial Services LLC (“USFS”EFS”), Lagasse, LLC (“Lagasse”), ORS Nasco,Essendant Industrial LLC (“ORS”EIN”), MBS Dev, Inc. (“MBS”), Oklahoma Rig, Inc. (“Rig”), Oklahoma Rig & Supply Co. Trans., Inc. (“Trans”), O.K.I. Supply, LLC (“OKI Supply”), O.K.I. Data, Inc. (“OKI Data”), and OKI Middle East Holding Co. (“OKI Holding”) in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Holders of Secured Obligations (as defined in the Intercreditor Agreement listed in Exhibit 10.3 (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2013)  

10.2

  

Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2007, by and among JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, in its capacity as agent and contractual representative, and the holders of the notes issued pursuant to the 2007Master Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2007, among ESND, ECO and the note purchasers identified therein (Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2007)

10.3

  

Joinder, dated as of January 15, 2014, to the Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 15, 2007, by and between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as collateral agent, and the holders of the notes issued pursuant to the 2013 Note Purchase Agreement (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s 2013 Form 10-K)

10.4

  

Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of October 15, 2007, among United Stationers Inc.ESND., USSC,ECO, Lagasse, Inc., USTSEMS and USFSEFS and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as collateral agent (Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2010)

10.5

  

Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2009, by and between USSC,ECO, as Originator, and USFS,EFS, as Purchaser (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 8, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2009”))

10.6

  

Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2009, by and between USFS,EFS, as Seller, and USR,Essendant Receivables LLC (“ESR”), as Purchaser (Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2010)

10.7

  

Performance Guarantee, dated as of March 3, 2009, among USI,ESND, as Performance Guarantee, and USR,ESR, as Recipient (Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2009)

10.8

 

Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2013, between United Stationers Supply Co., United Stationers Receivables, LLC, United Stationers Financial Services LLC,ECO, ESR, EFS, and PNC Bank, National Association (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2013)

10.9*10.9

 

Assignment and Assumption and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2013, by USR, USSC, USFS,ESR, ECO, EFS, PNC Bank, National Association and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch (Exhibit 10.9 to the 2014 Form 10-K)

10.10

 

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of January 23, 2014, by USR, USSC, USFS,ESR, ECO, EFS, PNC Bank, National Association and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on April 28, 2014 (the “Form 10-Q filed on April 28, 2014”))  2014)

10.11

 

Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2014, by USR, USSC, USFS,ESR, ECO, EFS, PNC Bank, National Association and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, filed on October 24, 2014 (the “Form 10-Q filed on October 24, 2014”) )


Exhibit
Number

Description2014)

10.12

 

Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2014, among USR, USSC, USFS,ESR, ECO, EFS, PNC Bank, National Association, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch (“BTMU”) (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2014)

70


Exhibit
Number

  

Description

10.13

Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2014, among ESR, ECO, EFS, PNC Bank, National Association, and BTMU (Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on April 20, 2016)

10.14*

Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2014, among ESR, ECO, EFS, PNC Bank, National Association, and BTMU

10.15

Consent Letter, dated January 22, 2016, by and between ESR, PNC Bank, National Association and BTMU (Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on April 20, 2016)

10.16

Consent Letter, dated August 30, 2016, by and between ESR, PNC Bank, National Association and BTMU (Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)

10.17

  

Reaffirmation, dated as of July 8, 2013, executed by USI, USSC, USMS, USFS,ESND, ECO, EMS, EFS, Lagasse, ORS,EIN, MBS, Rig, Trans, OKI Supply, OKI Data and OKI Holding (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2013)

10.1410.18

  

Fourth Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2013, among USSC,ECO, as borrower, USI,ESND, as a loan party, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, , as Agent, and the financial institutions listed on the signature pages thereto (the “Credit Agreement”) (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2013)

10.15†10.19

Amendment No. 1 to Fourth Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2013, among ECO, as borrower, ESND, as a loan party, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Agent, and the financial institutions listed on the signature pages thereto (the “Credit Agreement”) (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on April 20, 2016)

10.20

Amendment No. 2 to Fourth Amended and Restated Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2013, among ECO, as borrower, ESND, as a loan party, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Agent, and the financial institutions listed on the signature pages thereto (the “Credit Agreement”) (Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)

10.21†

  

First Omnibus Amendment to Receivables Sale Agreement, Receivables Purchase Agreement and Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2012, between USSC, USR, USFS,ECO, ESR, EFS, and Bank of America, National Association (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 26, 2012)

10.1610.22

  

Second Omnibus Amendment to Transaction Documents, dated as of January 18, 2013, between USSC, USR, USFS,ECO, ESR, EFS, Bank of America, National Association, and PNC Bank, National Association (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2013)

10.1710.23

  

Industrial/Commercial Single Tenant Lease—Net,Third Omnibus Amendment to Transaction Documents, dated November 4, 2004,as of July 24, 2015, between Cransud One, L.L.C.ESND, ECO, EFS, ESR and USSCBank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi JRJ, Ltd. New York Branch and PNC Bank, National Association (Exhibit 10.2710-1 to the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,From 8-K, filed March 16, 2005)on July 2 , 2015)

10.18

Lease, dated July 25, 2005, among USI, USSC and Carr Parkway North I, LLC (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2005)

10.1910.24

  

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between USIESND and (for purposes of one provision) USSCECO with directors and various executive officers of USIESND (Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s 2001 Form 10-K)**

10.2010.25

  

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by USIESND and (for purposes of one provision) USSCECO with directors and executive officers of USIESND (Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2002)**

10.2110.26

  

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by USIESND and (for purposes of one provision) USSCECO with P. Cody Phipps and other executive officers of USIESND (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed on August 6, 2004)**

10.2210.27

  

Form of grant letter used for grants of non-qualified options to non-employee directors under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 3, 2004 (the “September 3, 2004 Form 8-K”))**

10.2310.28

  

Form of grant letter used for grants of non-qualified stock options to employees under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2004 Form 8-K)2004)**

10.2410.29

  

United StationersEssendant Inc. Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan effective January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.33 to the 2008 Form 10-K)**

10.2510.30

  

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed on November 7, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2008”))**2008) **

10.2610.31

  

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2008)**

10.2710.32

  

United Stationers SupplyEssendant Co. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.26 to the 2009 Form 10-K)**

10.2810.33

  

United StationersEssendant Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan”) effective as of May 11, 2011 (Appendix A to the 2011 DEF 14-A Proxy Statement)**

10.29†

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated August 29, 2011, between the Registrant and P. Cody Phipps (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2011)**

10.30

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2012)**

10.31

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2012)**

10.32

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with EPS Minimum under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 30, 2012)**

10.3310.34

 

Form of Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2012 (Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K)**

10.34

Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2012, by and among USI, USSC and Paul Cody Phipps (Exhibit 10.46 to the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K)**

10.35

 

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter filed on April 30, 2013)**


Exhibit
Number

Description

10.36

 

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with EPS Minimum under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2013)**

10.37

 

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on April 28, 2014)**

71


10.38Exhibit
Number

  

United StationersDescription

10.38

Essendant Inc. Executive Severance Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to the form 10-Q filed on April 28, 2014)**

10.39

 

Essendant Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Appendix A to the Company’s 2015 Proxy Statement dated April 8, 2015)**

10.40

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed on April 23, 2015)**

10.41

Letter Agreement, dated June 4, 2015, by and among ESND, ECO and Robert B. Aiken, Jr. (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 9, 2015)**

10.42

Letter Agreement, dated June 22, 2015, by and among ESND, ECO, EMS and Robert B. Aiken, Jr. (Exhibit 10-1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2015)**

10.43

Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, by and among ESND, ECO, EMS and Robert B. Aiken, Jr. (Exhibit 10-1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 21, 2015)**

10.44

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, by and among ESND, ECO, EMS and Robert B. Aiken, Jr. (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)**

10.45

Letter Agreement, dated November 10, 2015, by and among ESND and Earl C. Shanks (Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 19, 2016) **

10.46

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed on April 20, 2016)**

10.47

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with EPS Minimum under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3

to the Company’ Form 10-Q filed on April 20, 2016)**

10.48†

2016 Cash Incentive Award Agreement with EPS Minimum, dated July 15, 2016, by and among Richard Philips and ESND (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)**

10.49

Form of Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)**

10.50

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with EPS Minimum under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.5

to the Company’ Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2016)**

10.51

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed on October 26, 2016)**

10.52

Essendant Inc. 2016 Annual Cash Incentive Award Plan for Section 16 Officers (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form

10-Q filed on April 20, 2016)**

10.53

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among USSC,ECO, SW Acquisition Corp. (“Merger Sub”), CPO Commerce, Inc. (“CPO”), certain security holders of CPO (“Principal Holders”) and Capstar Capital, LLC, as representative of the holders of CPO securities (“Representative”) dated May 28, 2014 (excluding schedules and exhibits, which the Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request). (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended June 30, 2014,  filed on July 25, 2014).

10.4010.54

 

Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2014, by USSC,ECO, Richard Bell, Lauren R. Bell, Alison R. Bell Keim, Andrew Keim, Chant Tobi, Donald R. Bernhardt, The Bell Family Trust for Lauren Bell, The Bell Family Trust for Alison (Bell) Keim, 6772731 Canada Inc., and Logistics Resource Group, L.P. (excluding schedules and exhibits, which the Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request). (Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed on October 24, 2014)

14.1*

 

Essendant Inc. Code of Business Conduct, effective as of December 13, 2016

21*

  

Subsidiaries of USIESND

23*

  

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1*

  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, dated as of February 17, 2015,27, 2017, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by P. Cody PhippsRobert B. Aiken

31.2*

  

Certification of Chief Financial Officer, dated as of February 17, 2015,27, 2017, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Todd A. SheltonEarl C. Shanks

32.1*

  

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, dated February 17, 2015,27, 2017, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 by P. Cody PhippsRobert B. Aiken and Todd A. SheltonEarl C. Shanks

101*

  

The following financial information from United StationersEssendant Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014,2016, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2015,27, 2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015, and 2012,2014, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income at(Loss) for the years ended December 31, 20142016, 2015, and 2013,2014, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015, and 2012,2014, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015, and 2012,2014, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

*

Filed herewith.

**

Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Confidential treatment has been requested for a portion of this document. Confidential portions have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

UNITED STATIONERSESSENDANT INC.

 

 

 

 

BY:

 

/s/ P. CODY PHIPPSROBERT B. AIKEN 

 

 

 

 

P. Cody PhippsRobert B. Aiken

 

 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: February 17, 201527, 2017

 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature

  

Capacity

  

Date

 

 

 

/s/ P. Cody PhippsROBERT B. AIKEN

  

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) and a Director

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

P. Cody PhippsRobert B. Aiken

 

 

 

/s/ Todd A. SheltonEARL C. SHANKS

  

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Todd A. SheltonEarl C. Shanks

 

 

 

/s/ ChristineCHRISTINE S. IeuterIEUTER

  

Vice President, Controller and

Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Christine S. Ieuter

 

 

 

/s/ CharlesCHARLES K. CrovitzCROVITZ

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Charles K. Crovitz

 

 

 

/s/ Paul s. williamsJEAN S. BLACKWELL

  

Director

  

February 17, 2015

Paul S. Williams

/s/ Jean S. Blackwell

Director

February 17, 201527, 2017

Jean S. Blackwell

 

 

 

/s/ RoyROY W. HaleyHALEY

  

Director

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Roy W. Haley

 

 

 

/ss/ / SusanDENNIS J. RileyMARTIN

 

Director

 

February 17, 201527, 2017

Dennis J. Martin

/s/ SUSAN J. RILEY

Director

February 27, 2017

Susan J. Riley

 

 

 

/s/ AlexALEX M. SchmelkinSCHMELKIN

  

Director

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Alex M. Schmelkin

 

 

 

/s/ STUART A. TAYLOR, II

Director

February 27, 2017

Stuart A. Taylor, II

/s/ PAUL S. WILLIAMS, II

  

Director

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Stuart A. Taylor, IIPaul S. Williams

 

 

 

/s/ AlexALEX D. ZoghlinZOGHLIN

  

Director

  

February 17, 201527, 2017

Alex D. Zoghlin

 

 

 


73


SCHEDULE II

UNITED STATIONERSESSENDANT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014

 

Description (in thousands)

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses

 

 

Deductions(1)

 

 

Reclassifications(2)

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts(3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$

20,608

 

 

$

4,898

 

 

$

(5,781

)

 

$

-

 

 

$

19,725

 

2013

 

 

22,716

 

 

 

4,888

 

 

 

(6,504

)

 

 

(492

)

 

 

20,608

 

2012

 

 

28,323

 

 

 

5,232

 

 

 

(8,490

)

 

 

(2,349

)

 

 

22,716

 

Description (in thousands)

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses

 

 

Deductions(1)

 

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

$

17,810

 

 

 

5,208

 

 

 

(4,822

)

 

 

$

18,196

 

2015

 

$

19,725

 

 

 

3,231

 

 

 

(5,146

)

 

 

$

17,810

 

2014

 

$

20,608

 

 

 

4,898

 

 

 

(5,781

)

 

 

$

19,725

 

 

(1)—net of any recoveries.

(2)—represents the reclassification of a valuation allowance for customer deductions which also offsets accounts receivable.

(3)—represents allowance for doubtful accounts related to the retained interest in receivables sold and accounts receivable, net.

 

7174