UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

ý

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016

December 31, 2017

Or

¨

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to             .

Commission file number: 1-10079

__________________________________________  
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

94-2885898

Delaware94-2885898
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

198 Champion Court, San Jose, California 95134

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 943-2600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $.01 par value

The NASDAQ Stock Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    ýx  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    ¨  Yes    ýx  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    ýx  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months ( or(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ýx  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “larger accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ýx    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No
ý  No

The market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the common stock on June 28, 2015July 2, 2017 as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was approximately $3.9$3.6 billion. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from the foregoing calculation in that such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 26, 2016, 314,558,61915, 2018, 354,988,171 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 are incorporated by reference in Items 10 - 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Item 1

Item 1A

18

Item 1B

29

Item 2

29

Item 3

29

Item 4

29

Item 5

30

Item 6

35

Item 7

36

Item 7A

57

Item 8

59

Item 9

110

Item 9A

110

Item 9B

111

Item 10

112

Item 11

112

Item 12

112

Item 13

112

Item 14

113

Item 15

114

Item 16

118

2




FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The discussion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that are not historical in nature, but are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, statements related to: our pursuit of long-term growth initiatives, including various long-term strategic corporate transformational initiatives, collectively referred to as our manufacturingCypress 3.0 strategy; the expected timingimprovements in margin and costs related to our integration with Spansion Inc. (“Spansion”) as a result of our recent merger; our ability to successfully execute on planned synergies relatedour margin improvement plan; our manufacturing strategy including our ability to efficiently manage our manufacturing facilities and achieve our cost goals emanating from our flexible manufacturing strategy; our ability to secure supply to meet customer demand, the merger;anticipated impact of our acquisitions, dispositions and restructuring activities; anticipated growth opportunities in the automotive, consumer and industrial markets; our expectations regarding dividends and stock repurchases; our expectations regarding future technology transfers and other licensing arrangements; our efforts to license and/or monetize our intellectual property portfolio; our expectations regarding the timing and cost of our restructuring liabilities; our expectations regarding our active litigation matters and our intent to defend ourselves in those matters; the competitive advantage we believe we have with our patents as well as our proprietary programmable technologies and programmable products; our plans for our products, pricing, and marketing efforts, including the potential impact on our customer base if we were to raise our prices; our backlog as an indicator of future performance; our ability to pay down our indebtedness and continue to meet the covenants set forth in our debt agreements; the risk associated with our yield investment agreements; our foreign currency exposure and the impact exchange rates could have on our operating margins; the adequacy of our cash and working capital positions; the value and liquidity of our investments;investments, including auction rate securities, and our other debt investments;investments, and investments in privately-held companies; the impact of U.S. tax reform efforts; our ability to recognize certain unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months as well as the resolution of agreements with various foreign tax authorities; our investment strategy; the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our investments; the volatility of our stock price; the impact of actions by stockholder activists; the size and composition of our Board of Directors; the adequacy of our real estate properties; the utility of our non-GAAP reporting; the adequacy of our audits; and the potential impact of our indemnification obligationsobligations; our plans to remediate the identified material weakness; and the impact of new accounting standards on our financial statements.statements and our ability to recognize revenue. We use words such as “may,” “will,”"may," "will," “should,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,”"plan," "anticipate," "believe," "expect," "future," "intend," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "continue," and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and are based on our current expectations, beliefs and intentions regarding future events or our financial performance and the information available to management as of the date hereof. In addition, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no responsibility to update any such forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those expected, discussed or projected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to,to: the state and future of the general economy and its impact on the markets and consumers we serve and our investments; our ability to execute on our Cypress 3.0 strategy and our margin improvement plan; our ability to effectively integrate our company with Spansion in a timely manner;companies and assets that we acquire; our ability to attract and retain key personnel; our ability to timely deliver our proprietary and programmable technologies and products; the current credit conditions; our ability to retain and expand our customer base;base, which may be adversely affected if we were to raise our prices; our ability to transform our business with a leading portfolio of programmable products; the number and nature of our competitors; the changing environment and/or cycles of the semiconductor industry; foreign currency exchange rates; our ability to efficiently manage our manufacturing facilities and achieve our cost goals emanating from our flexible manufacturing strategy; our ability to achieve our goals related to our restructuring activities; the uncertainty and expense of pending litigation matters; our successability to pay down our indebtedness and continue to meet the covenants set forth in our pending litigation matters;debt agreements; our ability to manage our investments and interest rate and exchange rate exposure; changes in the law including changes to tax and intellectual property law; the results of our pending tax examinations; our ability to achieve liquidity in our investments; the failure or success of the privately-held companies that we are invested in; our Emerging Technology division;ability to remediate any material weakness; and/or the materialization of one or more of the risks set forth above or under Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3





PART I
PART I

ITEM 1.

Business


General


Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress”) delivers high-performance, high-quality solutions at the heart of today’s mostmanufactures and sells advanced embedded systems, fromsystem solutions for automotive, industrial, home automation and networking platforms to highly interactiveappliances, consumer electronics and mobile devices. With a broad, differentiated product portfolio that includes NOR flash memories, SRAMmedical products. Cypress' microcontrollers, analog ICs, wireless and F-RAM™, Traveo™ microcontrollers, the industry’s only PSoC® programmable system-on-chip solutions, analog and PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive touch-sensing controllers, and Wireless BLE Bluetooth Low-Energy and USBwired connectivity solutions and memories help engineers design differentiated products and help with speed to market. Cypress is committed to providing its customers worldwide with consistent innovation, best-in-classquality support and exceptional system value. Cypress serves numerous major markets, including automotive, industrial, communications, consumer, computation, data communications, mobile handsets and military markets.

engineering resources. 


Cypress was incorporated in California in December 1982. The initial public offering took place in May 1986, at which time our common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ National Market. In February 1987, we were reincorporated in Delaware. Our stock is listed on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “CY”.


Our corporate headquarters are located at 198 Champion Court, San Jose, California 95134, and our main telephone number is (408) 943-2600. We maintain a website at www.cypress.com. The contents of our website are not incorporated into, or otherwise to be regarded as part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Our fiscal 2017 ended on December 31, 2017, fiscal 2016 ended on January 1, 2017, and fiscal 2015 ended on January 3, 2016, fiscal 2014 ended on December 28, 2014, and fiscal 2013 ended on December 29, 2013.

Business Segments

As of the end of fiscal 2015, our organization included the following business segments:

2016.

Business Segments

Description

PSD: Programmable Systems Division

PSD focuses on high-performance, programmable solutions. The programmable portfolio includes high-performance Traveo™automotive microcontrollers, PSoC® programmable system-on-chip products, ARM® Cortex®-M4, -M3, -M0+ microcontrollers and R4 CPUs, analog PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive-sensing controllers, TrueTouch® touchscreen and fingerprint reader products, and PSoC Bluetooth Low Energy solutions for the Internet of Things (“IoT”). Effective March 12, 2015, PSD added Spansion’s microcontroller and analog products.

MPD: Memory Products Division

MPD focuses on high-performance parallel and serial NOR flash memories, NAND flash memories, static random access memory (SRAM), and high-reliability F-RAM™ferroelectric memory devices. Its purpose is to enhance our position in these products and invent new products and derivatives. Effective March 12, 2015, MPD added Spansion’s Flash memory products.

DCD: Data Communications Division

DCD focuses on USB controllers, Bluetooth® Low Energy solutions that leverage Cypress’s PRoC™ programmable radio-on-chip technology, WirelessUSB™ solutions, module solutions such as trackpads and Bluetooth Low Energy modules, and controllers for the new USB Type-C standard, which enables data transmission and power delivery over a single cable with a slimmer plug. DCD focuses primarily on industrial, handset and consumer electronics markets and applications.

ETD: Emerging Technologies Division

Also known as our “startup” division, ETD includes subsidiaries AgigA, Tech Inc. and Deca Technologies Inc., as well as our foundry business and other development-stage activities.


For additional information on our segments, see Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

4


Recent Developments

Business Strategies

Cypress is committed to growing revenue in profitable and attractive markets, managing its expenses and to maintaining a strong balance sheet. We maintain many of our business operations in low-cost centers, including Malaysia, Thailand, India, the Philippines and China. In addition, we are using foundry partners to supplement our manufacturing needs.

In 2013, Cypress introduced the PSoC 4 programmable system-on-chip architecture and with a sophisticated 32-bit ARM® Cortex™-M0 processor and the high-performance analog and digital circuitry of PSoC 3 and PSoC 5LP, all in a small-footprint, low-power single-chip solution.

In 2014, Cypress introduced the CapSense MBR3 mechanical button replacement family and the industry’s most integrated one-chip Bluetooth Low Energy solutions for the IoT. The low-cost CapSense MBR3 capacitive touch-sensing controllers do not require coding, enabling designers to quickly implement sleek, reliable user interfaces for a broad range of markets. They offer leading noise immunity, proximity sensing and water tolerance. The new PSoC 4 BLE offers unprecedented ease-of-use and integration in a customizable solution for IoT applications, home automation, healthcare equipment, sports and fitness monitors, and other wearable devices. The PRoC™ BLE programmable radio-on-chip provides a cost-effective, turnkey solution for wireless human interface devices, remote controls and toys.

Acquisitions & Divestitures

In March 2015, Cypresswe completed thea merger (“Merger”("Merger") with Spansion Inc. ("Spansion") for a total consideration of approximately $2.8 billion. Spansion was a leading designer, manufacturer and developer of embedded systems semiconductors with flash memory, microcontrollers, analog and mixed-signal products. Spansion’s broad portfolio of Traveo™ automotive MCUs, NOR flash and HyperFlash™ memories, and automotive power management ICs (PMICs) combined with Cypress’s flexible PSoC® solutions, CapSense® capacitive-sensing solutions, TrueTouch® touchscreen solutions and nonvolatile ferroelectric-RAMs (F-RAMs) to make Cypress the No. 3 supplier of automotive MCUs and memories. Spansion’s portfolio of ARM®-based MCUs complemented Cypress’s ARM-based PSoC solutions, and Spansion’s NOR and NAND flash memories enhanced the Cypress SRAM and nonvolatile memory portfolio, creating a global leader in embedded systems.  


In August 2015, we completed the sale of the TrueTouch® mobile touchscreen business which is a business unit within our Programmable Systems Division, to Parade Technologies (“Parade”("Parade") for total cash proceeds of $98.6 million pursuant to the definitive agreement.million. Post-sale, Cypress will continuewe continued to provide TrueTouch® solutions to itsour automotive, industrial and home appliance customers.  


In July 2016, we completed the acquisition of certain assets primarily related to the Internet of Things ("IoT") wireless business of Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom") pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement with Broadcom dated April 28, 2016, for a total purchase consideration of $550 million.

In March 2017, we completed the sale of our wafer fabrication facility in Minnesota. We recorded a gain of $1.2 million in fiscal 2017 resulting from the change in the estimated costs to sell the assets.

Business Strategy

Our primary focus is profitable growth in our key markets. With the addition of the legacy Spansion business, weWe plan to capitalize on our expanded product portfolio and leadership positions in embedded processing and specialized memories to significantly extend our penetration of global markets such as the automotive, industrial, communications, consumer, computation, data communications and militarycomputation markets. Our revenue model is based on the following product and market strategies: (a) focus on providing customers with complete solutions, including multiple Cypress products where applicable, and supporting software, (b) growing revenue from our programmable solutions and derivatives including PSoC®, Traveo™ and other microcontrollers in the automotive and industrial markets, (c) increasing market shareour connectivity revenue through the introduction of new products such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth® and, Bluetooth Low Energy, USB-C and USB Power Delivery solutions and SuperSpeed USB 3.0 peripheral controllers and (d) increasing profitability in our memory products by leveraging our market position and expanding our portfolio with new and complementary products (b) growing revenue from our high-performance, programmable solutions and derivatives including PSoC programmable system-on-chip products and microcontrollers inprimarily targeted at the automotive and industrial markets, (c) increasing our DCD revenue through the introduction of new products such as USB Type-C solutions, SuperSpeed USB 3.0 peripheral controllers and Bluetooth® Low Energy solutions that leverage Cypress’s PRoC™ programmable radio-on-chip technology for the IoT and other applications, and (d) revenue growth from ETD, which includes our internal startup companies. For profitability, our focus is to integrate the acquired Spansion business successfully and realize the anticipated product cost and operational cost synergies. Our integration effort includes the re-focusing of portions of legacy Spansion business to higher-margin opportunities, particularly in the Flash memory business segment.markets. We monitor our operating expenses closely to improve our operating leverage as driven by various company-wide initiatives.

During fiscal 2016, we launched various long-term strategic corporate transformation initiatives, includingcollectively being referred to as Cypress 3.0 initiatives. Cypress 3.0 intends to increase our World Class Cost programfocus on becoming a solution-driven company, increase ease of doing business, redeploy personnel and resources to continuously reduce cost line items as well as a Human Resources efforttarget markets segments that are expected to reduce redundancygrow faster than the industry and improve efficiency across the company.

In order to achievestreamline our goals on revenue growth and profitability, Cypress will continue to pursue the following strategies:

·

Successfully integrate our business with Spansion. We are committed to integrating the business of Cypress and Spansion successfully to realize the anticipated cost synergies and improve the bottom line.

internal processes.

·

Cross-sell products from Cypress’s expanded product portfolio in the wake of the Spansion Merger. We will continue to take advantage of product and business synergies and grow our top-line revenue.


·

Focus on large and growing markets. We will continue to pursue business opportunities in large and growing markets, particularly the automotive and industrial markets.

5


·

Drive profitability. Cypress has implemented and maintained a tight, corporate wide focus on gross margin and operating expenses. We are committed to maintaining our current strong operating expense management without compromising our new product development and investments in our Emerging Technologies Division.

·

Drive programmable technologies, extend our leadership in programmable products and drive PSoC and microcontroller proliferation. We will continue to define, design and develop new programmable products and solutions that offer our customers increased flexibility and efficiency, higher performance, and higher levels of integration with a focus on analog functionality. We will continue to drive PSoC and microcontroller adoption in our key market segments.

·

Collaborate with customers to build system-level solutions. We work closely with our customers from initial product design through manufacturing and delivery to optimize their design efforts, help them achieve product differentiation, improve their time-to-market and help them to develop whole product solutions.

·

Leverage flexible manufacturing. Our manufacturing strategy combines capacity from leading foundries with output from our internal manufacturing facilities. This enables us to meet rapid swings in customer demand while reducing the burden of high fixed costs.

·

Identify and exit legacy or non-strategic, underperforming businesses. We will continue to monitor and, if necessary, to exit certain business units that are inconsistent with our future initiatives and long-term financial plans so that we can focus our resources and efforts on our core programmable and proprietary business model. The sale of our TrueTouch® mobile business to Parade Technologies, Ltd. during the third quarter of 2015 is an example of this business strategy.

·

Pursue complementary strategic relationships. We will continue to assess opportunities to develop strategic relationships through acquisitions, investments, licensing and joint development projects. We also will continue to make significant investments in current ventures as well as new ventures.

As we continue to implement our strategies, there are many internal and external factors that could impact our ability to meet any or all of our objectives. Some of these factors are discussed under Item 1A.

Product/Service Overview

Programmable Solutions1A Risk Factors.




Business Segments

We continuously evaluate our reportable business segments in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. The Company operates under two reportable business segments: Microcontroller and Connectivity Division (PSD):

The Programmable Solutions("MCD") and Memory Products Division designs and develops solutions for many("MPD"). 

Business SegmentsDescription
Microcontroller and Connectivity Division ("MCD")
MCD focuses on high-performance microcontroller (MCU), analog and wireless and wired connectivity solutions. The portfolio includes Traveo™automotive MCUs, PSoC® programmable MCUs and general-purpose MCUs with ARM® Cortex®-M4, -M3, -M0+ and R4 CPUs, analog PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive-sensing controllers, TrueTouch® touchscreen, Wi-Fi®, Bluetooth®, Bluetooth Low Energy and ZigBee® solutions and the WICED® development platform, and a broad line of USB controllers, including solutions for the USB-C and USB Power Delivery (PD) standards. MCD includes wireless connectivity solutions acquired from Broadcom effective July 5, 2016. This division also includes our intellectual property (IP) business. The historical results of MCD through July 29, 2016 include the results of Deca Technologies, Inc.
Memory Products Division ("MPD")
MPD focuses on specialized, high-performance parallel and serial NOR flash memories, NAND flash memories, static random access memory (SRAM), F-RAM™ferroelectric memory devices, non-volatile SRAM (nvSRAM), other specialty memories and timing solutions. This division also includes our subsidiary AgigA Tech Inc.

For additional information on our segments, see Note 21 of the world’s leading end-product manufacturers. PSD delivers high-performance, programmable solutions atNotes to the heart of today's most advanced embedded systems. The product portfolio includes high-performance Traveo™ automotive microcontrollers, the industry’s only PSoC® programmable system-on-chip solutions, ARM® Cortex®-M4, M3, M0+ microcontrollers and R4 CPUs, analog PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive touch-sensing controllers, TrueTouch® fingerprint readers, TrueTouch® touchscreen controllers and wireless BLE Bluetooth® Low-Energy devices. Our automotive business unit is part of PSD and is designed to offer complete solutions for systems such as instrument clusters, infotainment and body electronics. Cypress is committed to delivering best-in-class support, exceptional technical documentation and flexible, low-cost development kits for embedded system developers.

6


Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8.



Product Overview

The following table summarizes the markets and certain applications related to our products in thisthe MCD segment:


Products

Markets

Applications

ProductsMarketsApplications
Traveo™ MCUs, Flexible MCUs, PSoC® MCUs, CapSense® capacitive-sensing controllers and Flexible Microcontrollers

Automotive TrueTouch
® touchscreen controllers

Automotive, industrial, consumer, IoT, computation, white goods, communication

communications

Automotive instrument clusters, body electronics, batterypower management driver informationand infotainment systems, factory automation, machine-to-machine systems, building management systems, smart meters, printers, and many other applications.

PSoC® 1, PSoC 3, PSoC 4 and PSoC 5LP

Consumer, handsets, Industrial, medical, IoT, communications, automotive

IoT applications, industrial and automotive control applications, digital still and video cameras, smart home appliances, handheld devices and accessories, desktop and notebook computers, LCD monitors,PCs and peripherals, medical devices, mice, keyboards, toys, e-Bikeswhite goods and many other applications.

CapSense®

Handsets, consumer, industrial, IoT, computation, white goods, communication, automotive

Notebook computers and PCs, home appliances, handheld devices, wearables, automotive control pads/media centers, digital cameras, toys, consumer products and many other applications.

TrueTouch®

Automotive, industrial

Automotive infotainment systems, factory automation

Analog PMICs LED drivers and energy harvesting solutions

Automotive, industrial, consumer IoT

Instrument cluster systems, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), body control modules, instrument cluster systems, front lighting systems, factory automation, IoT beacons, wireless sensor nodes and many other applications.

Traveo™ MCUs and Flexible Microcontrollers. Our Traveo™ automotive MCU family offers high-performance Human Machine Interfaces for automotive dashboards. The microcontrollers integrate 2-D and 3-D graphic engines. This is a development where we are integrating our flash memory technologies with our microcontrollers and analog IP. This family also features our HyperBus memory interface. The combination of our HyperFlash memory with the HyperBus interface eliminates memory bottlenecks, increases performance, and extends the memory space for MCU and graphic engines without increasing the package pin count. Our Flexible Microcontroller (FM) portfolio, which is based on the ARM® Cortex®-M4, Cortex®-M3, Cortex®-M0+ CPUs, is a scalable platform for industrial and consumer applications.

PSoC Programmable System-on-Chip products. Our PSoC products are highly integrated, high-performance mixed-signal devices with an on-board microcontroller, programmable analog and digital blocks, SRAM and flash memory. They provide a low-cost, single-chip solution for a variety of consumer, industrial, medical, and system management applications. A single PSoC device can potentially integrate as many as 100 peripheral functions, saving customers design time, board space, power consumption and system costs. Because of its programmability, PSoC allows customers to make modifications at any point during the design cycle, providing unmatched flexibility.

Cypress’s PSoC 1 device offers performance, programmability and flexibility with a cost-optimized 8-bit M8 CPU subsystem. PSoC 3 uses an 8-bit, Intel® 8051-based microcontroller with 7.5 times more computing power than PSoC 1. The 32-bit, ARM® -Cortex™ M3-based PSoC 5LP has 25 times more computing power than PSoC 1. The analog-to-digital converters on PSoC 3 and PSoC 5LP are 256 times more accurate and 10 to 30 times faster than PSoC 1, and there are 10 times more programmable logic gates available. PSoC 4 is based on a 32-bit ARM Cortex-M0 processor combined with precision analog circuitry, high-performance digital blocks, fully-routable I/Os and our leading CapSense capacitive touch technology. Platform PSoC is supported by the unique PSoC Creator™ design tool that allows engineers to use intuitive schematic-based capture and dozens of PSoC Components™, free embedded ICs represented by icons that can be dragged and dropped into a design to integrate multiple ICs and system interfaces into one PSoC. PSoC 4 BLE, a Bluetooth Low Energy solution that integrates a Bluetooth Smart radio and balun into the PSoC 4 architecture, offers unprecedented ease-of-use and integration for IoT applications, home automation, healthcare equipment, sports and fitness monitors, and other wearable smart devices. Cypress has shipped more than two billion PSoC devices.

TrueTouch® Touchscreen solutions. TrueTouch® provides capacitive touchscreen solutions for automotive infotainment systems, industrial equipment and home appliances. The TrueTouch® family includes devices that perform traditional touchscreen functions including interpreting multitouch operation, single touches, and gestures such as tap, double-tap, pan, pinch, scroll and rotate. In 2015, Cypress introduced the Automotive TrueTouch® CYAT8168X controller family, which enables screen sizes up to 15-inches with industry-leading performance in harsh automotive environments. The controller uses Cypress’s proprietary AutoArmor™ technology for robust immunity to the strong electromagnetic interference (EMI) emissions found in cars, buses and trucks, and it provides liquid tolerance and tracking of fingers in gloves.

7


CapSense® solutions. Our CapSense capacitive touch-sensing solutions replace mechanical switches and buttons with simple, touch-sensitive controls by detecting the presence or absence of a conductive object (such as a finger) and measuring changes in capacitance. This technology lends itself equally well to buttons, sliders, touchpads, touchscreens and proximity sensors, taking industrial design possibilities to a much higher level. The CapSense portfolio supports all different ranges of general purpose inputs/outputs, buttons and slider devices. Cypress’s CapSense devices feature SmartSense™ technology, an automatic tuning solution that dynamically detects and adjusts a system’s capacitive-sensing parameters, eliminating the need for manual tuning. The low-cost CapSense MBR3 mechanical button replacement solution that does not require coding, enabling designers to quickly implement reliable user interfaces for a broad range of markets. MBR3 devices offer leading noise immunity, proximity sensing and water tolerance. CapSense has replaced more than 5 billion buttons, making Cypress the worldwide capacitive sensing market share leader.

Analog Semiconductors. Analog semiconductors measure, condition and regulate “real world” functions such as temperature, speed, sound and electrical current. Our lineup of power management integrated circuits (PMICs) includes DC/DC converters, voltage regulators and supervisors, and power monitoring and reset ICs. In addition, we offer a family of LED lighting driver ICs and energy harvesting solutions. These solutions target automotive and industrial applications, and our energy harvesting solutions are ideal for eliminating the need to replace batteries in IoT applications.

Memory Products Division (MPD):

Our Memory Products Division designs and manufactures the broadest portfolio of high-performance memories for embedded systems. Cypress has established itself as the marketshare leader in NOR Flash and SRAM memories that form the brains of today's most advanced embedded systems. The memory product portfolio includes the world's highest throughput QDR®-IV SRAMs, low-power MoBL® SRAMs, high-performance serial and parallel NOR Flash memories and high-reliability F-RAM™ ferroelectric memory devices that capture and protect the world's most-critical data. Cypress's industry-leading HyperFlash™ memories deliver 333 megabytes per second read throughput-more than five times faster than traditional Quad SPI flash, and one-third the number of pins of parallel NOR flash.

8


Our MPD Division also includes timing technology products and specialty memory offerings. The following table summarizes the markets and applications related to our products in this segment:

Products

Markets

Applications

Wi-Fi®, Bluetooth®, Bluetooth Low Energy and ZigBee®

NOR Flash and HyperFlash™

Automotive, industrial, consumer, white goods, PC peripherals

IoT applications, wearables, smart home appliances, industrial automation equipment, connected cars, mice, appliances, keyboards, wireless headsets, consumer

Automotive advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), automotive instrument cluster, automotive infotainment systems, networking routers and switches, high-definition televisions and set-top boxes, digital SLR cameras, electronics, gamepads, remote controls, toys, wearablespresenter tools and many other applications

applications.

NAND Flash

Industrial, IoT, consumer

Set-top boxes, point-of-sale systems, security systems, wearables, toys, smart home appliances

EZ-PD™ controllers for USB-C with Power Delivery
and many other applications.

HyperRAM™

Automotive, industrial, IoT

Automotive advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), automotive instrument cluster, automotive infotainment systems, digital cameras, projectors, factory automation, medical equipment, home automation and appliances, handhelds and many other applications.

Asynchronous SRAMs

Consumer, networking, industrial

Consumer electronics, switches and routers, test equipment, automotive and industrial electronics.

Synchronous SRAMs

Telecommunications, networking

Enterprise routers and switches, wireless base stations, high bandwidth applications and industrial and defense electronics.

nvSRAMs

Networking, industrial

Redundant array of independent disk (RAID) servers, point of sale terminals, set-top boxes, copiers, industrial automation, printers, single-board computers and gaming.

F-RAMs

Automotive, medical

Smart electric meters, aerospace, medical systems, automotive, industrial controls, electronic point-of-sale terminals, printers and wireless (RFID) memory.

Dual-port
Memories

Networking, telecommunication

Medical and instrumentation, storage, wireless infrastructure, military communications, image processors and base stations.

First-in, first-out (FIFO)
Memories

Video, data communications, telecommunications, networking

Video, data communications, telecommunications, and network switching/routing.

Programmable clocks

Communications, computation

Set-top boxes, copiers, printers, HDTV, Industrial automation, printers, single-board computers, IP phones, storage devices, servers and routers.

RoboClock® buffers

Communications

Base stations, high-end telecom equipment (switches, routers), servers and storage.

NOR Flash memories and HyperFlash™. Cypress offers the broadest portfolio of NOR flash memories for embedded systems. The portfolio features the highest-performance HyperFlash™ and Quad SPI NOR flash memories delivering up to 333MB/s read bandwidth, with the industry leading program and erase, and extended automotive temperature ranges (-40°C to 125°C). Our HyperBus™ interface is being implemented broadly by many of our partners. It is being designed across our industrial, automotive, and communication segments.

NAND Flash memories. Our NAND products add reliable, high-density data storage to our flash product line. Cypress applies its stringent process for qualification, testing, extended temperature support and packaging to its line of SLC NAND products. Our high-performance and high-reliability SLC NAND product portfolio is available in 1Gb - 16 Gb densities. There are two standard product families offering 1bit and 4bit ECC SLC NAND. We also offer SecureNAND™, which is an SLC NAND with enhanced security features.

9


HyperRAM. Our HyperRAM™ memory is the first companion device to our HyperFlash™ memory and the second device to operate on our 12-pin HyperBus interface. With a read throughput up to 333 megabytes-per-second, the HyperRAM devices are ideal for SoCs with limited RAM providing a scalable solution for extending fast read and write operations externally, allowing fast delivery of high-resolution graphics in the early part of the boot process for automotive, industrial and IoT applications.

Asynchronous SRAMs. We manufacture a wide selection of fast asynchronous and micropower SRAMs with densities ranging from 16 Kbits to 64 Mbits. These memories are available in many combinations of bus widths, packages and temperature ranges, and include offering for the automotive market. They are ideal for use in point-of-sale terminals, gaming machines, network switches and routers, IP phones, IC testers, DSLAM Cards and various automotive applications.

Synchronous SRAMs. Our high-speed synchronous SRAMs include standard synchronous pipelined, No Bus Latency (NoBL), Quad Data Rate (QDR®), and Double Data Rate (DDR) SRAMs, and are typically used in networking applications. NoBL synchronous SRAMs are optimized for high-speed applications that require maximum bus bandwidth up to 250 MHz, including those in the networking, instrumentation, video and simulation businesses. Double Data Rate SRAMs target network applications and servers that operate at data rates up to 633 MHz. Quad Data Rate products are targeted toward next-generation networking applications, particularly switches and routers that operate at data rates beyond 633 MHz, and offer twice the bus bandwidth of DDR SRAMs. Cypress introduced the industry’s first 65-nm QDR and DDR SRAMs. The 144-Mbit and 72-Mbit devices, developed with foundry partner UMC, feature the industry’s fastest clock speeds and operate at half the power of their 90-nm predecessors. They are ideal for networking, medical imaging and military signal processing. In 2014, Cypress introduced the industry’s first QDR-IV SRAM, which enables 100-400 Gigabit line card rates for next-generation routers and switches.

nvSRAMs. nvSRAMs are products that operate similar to standard asynchronous SRAM and reliably store data into an internal nonvolatile array during unanticipated power outages. The competitive advantage of an nvSRAM is infinite endurance and much faster read/write speed than a serial flash or EEPROM. Additionally, these high-speed nonvolatile SRAM devices can store data for more than 20 years without battery backup. These memories are ideal for redundant array of independent disks (“RAID”) storage arrays, metering applications, multifunction printers and other industrial applications, such as PLCs. Cypress offers parallel nvSRAMs with an integrated real-time clock, providing failsafe battery-free data backup in mission-critical applications.

F-RAMs. Cypress’s F-RAM memories offer extremely low power with the same non-volatility as nvSRAM products. F-RAM memory cells are immune to gamma radiation and EMI, making them well-suited to certain aerospace and medical systems. Other applications include automotive, smart electric meters, industrial controls, electronic point-of-sale terminals, printers and wireless (RFID) memory.

Dual-Port Memories. Dual ports, which can be accessed by two different processors or buses simultaneously, target shared-memory and switching applications, including networking switches and routers, cellular base stations, mass-storage devices and telecommunications equipment. We offer a portfolio of more than 250 synchronous and asynchronous dual-port interconnects ranging in densities from 8 Kbits to 36 Mbits with speeds of up to 250 MHz. Our dual ports are compelling solutions for interprocessor communication in a broad range of applications. For high-volume multiprocessor applications (wireless handsets, PDAs, consumer, etc.) we offer the MoBL™ (More Battery-Life™) dual port, providing a low cost, quick time-to-market interconnect solution with the industry’s lowest power-consumption.

FIFO Memories. FIFOs are used as a buffer between systems operating at different frequencies. Our high-performance FIFO products provide the ideal solution to interconnect problems such as flow control, rate matching, and bus matching. Our FIFO portfolio is comprised of more than 100 synchronous and asynchronous memories in a variety of speeds, bus widths, densities and packages. Using industry-standard pinouts, these products are easily integrated into new and existing designs. Unidirectional, bidirectional, tri-bus and double sync configurations are available with built-in expansion logic and message-passing capabilities for various markets including video, data communications, telecommunications and network switching/routing.

Programmable Clocks. Programmable timing solutions such as our InstaClock device combine high performance with the flexibility and fast time to market of field-programmable devices at a cost that is competitive against custom clocks at equivalent volumes. Working with our easy-to-use CyberClocks™ software, designers can optimize device parameters such as drive strength, phased-lock loop bandwidth and crystal input capacitive loading. Our programmable clocks are ideal for devices requiring multiple frequencies including Ethernet, PCI, USB, HDTV, and audio applications. Additionally, the FleXO™ family of high-performance clock generators can be instantly programmed in the factory or field to any frequency up to 650 MHz, accelerating time to market and improving manufacturing quality.

10


RoboClock™ Clock Buffers. Our RoboClock family of clock buffers features programmable output skew, programmable multiply/divide factor, and fault-tolerant, user-selectable, redundant reference clocks. Designers can control output skew and multiply and divide factors to help accommodate last-minute design changes. RoboClock offers a high-performance timing solution for designers of communications, computation and storage networking applications.

Data Communications Division (DCD):

The Data Communications Division delivers flexible connectivity solutions that form the nervous system within the most-advanced embedded systems. Today Cypress is enabling the world to migrate to SuperSpeed USB 3.0 with the flexible EZ-USB® FX3™ peripheral controller and SuperSpeed USB 3.0 hubs. Cypress is leading the industry with the world's first programmable USB Type-C and USB Power Delivery solutions, including the EZ-PD™ Type-C controllers. Cypress's PRoC™ BLE Bluetooth® Low-Energy wireless devices are enabling PC peripherals and smart remote control OEMs to upgrade to BLE. Additionally, Cypress offers certified BLE modules that streamline the design of IoT products and other wireless applications.

The following table summarizes the markets and applications related to our products in this segment:

Products

Markets

Applications

USB controllers

Industrial, handset, PC and peripherals, consumer electronics,

mobile devices, automotive

Printers, cameras, machine vision and other industrial equipment, mice, keyboards, handheld devices, gamepads and joysticks, VoIP phones, headsets, presenter tools, dongles, point of sale devices and bar code scanners.

EZ-PD™ controllers for USB-C with Power Delivery

PCscanners, PCs and peripherals consumer electronics, IoT

smartphones, USB-C power adapters, USB-C adapter cables, monitors, docking stations and many other applications

applications.




The following table summarizes the markets and applications related to our products in the MPD segment:

Bluetooth® Low EnergyProducts

MarketsApplications
NOR Flash and WirelessUSB™ solutions

HyperFlash™

IoT, PC peripherals

Automotive, industrial, consumer

Wearables, mice, keyboards, wireless headsets, consumer electronics, gamepads, remote controls, toys, presenter toolsAutomotive advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), automotive instrument cluster, automotive infotainment systems, security systems, industrial control and automation systems, networking routers and switches and many other applications.

Trackpad Solutions

NAND Flash

PCs,Automotive, industrial, consumer

Cypress has applied its capacitive sensing expertise to the trackpad market for laptop computers and consumer devices. Trackpads offer cursor

Automotive instrument cluster, automotive infotainment systems, set-top boxes, networking equipment, point-of-sale systems, security systems, industrial control and automation systems, smart home appliances and many other functions,applications.

HyperRAM™Automotive, industrialAutomotive instrument cluster, factory automation, industrial control and Cypress’s solution has been adopted by multiple PC manufacturers.

automation systems, home automation and appliances, handhelds and many other application.
Asynchronous SRAMsAutomotive, consumer, networking, industrialConsumer electronics, switches and routers, test equipment, automotive and industrial electronics.
Synchronous SRAMsTelecommunications, networkingEnterprise routers and switches, wireless base stations, high bandwidth applications and industrial and defense electronics.
nvSRAMsNetworking, industrial
Point of sale terminals, set-top boxes, copiers, industrial automation, printers, single- board computers Redundant array of independent disk (RAID) servers, and gaming.

F-RAMsAutomotive, medicalSmart meters, aerospace, medical systems, automotive, industrial controls, electronic point-of-sale terminals, printers and wireless (RFID) memory.
Specialty Memories and Clocks
Networking, telecommunication, video, data communications, computation

Medical and instrumentation, storage, wireless infrastructure, military communications, Video, data communications, telecommunications, and network switching/routing, set-top boxes, copiers, printers, HDTV, Industrial automation, printers, single-board computers, IP phones, image processors and base stations.


11


USB controllers. Cypress is a market leader in USB with more than one billion devices shipped. USB provides the primary connection between a PC and peripherals, including keyboards, mice, printers, joysticks, scanners and modems. It is also used to connect non-PC systems, such as smartphones, handheld games, digital still cameras and portable media players. The USB standard facilitates a “plug-and-play” architecture that enables instant recognition and interoperability when a USB-compatible peripheral is connected to a system. We offer a full range of USB solutions, including low-speed (1.5 Mbps), full-speed (12 Mbps), high-speed (480 Mbps) and now “SuperSpeed” (up to 5 Gbps) USB products. We also offer a variety of USB hubs, transceivers, serial interface engines and embedded-host products for a broad range of applications.

Bluetooth Low Energy and Wireless USB solutions. Designed for short-range wireless connectivity, WirelessUSB enables personal computer peripherals, gaming controllers, remote controls, toys, and other point-to-point or multipoint-to-point applications to “cut the cord” with a low-cost, 2.4-GHz wireless solution. The WirelessUSB system acts as a USB human interface device, so the connectivity is transparent to the designer at the operating system level. WirelessUSB also operates as a simple, cost-effective wireless link in a host of other applications including industrial, consumer, and medical markets.

Manufacturing

Our PRoC™ BLE (Programmable Radio-on-a-Chip Bluetooth Low Energy) solution"flexible manufacturing" strategy combines a Bluetooth Smart radio, an ARM Cortex-M0 processor and CapSense capacitive touch-sensing in a single chip. The highly-integrated PRoC BLE device provides a cost-effective, turnkey solution for wireless human interface devices, remote controls and toys. We also offer certified EZ-BLE PRoC and EZ-BLE PSoC modules that streamline wireless design even further.

Trackpad. We design and manufacture turnkey Trackpad sensor module solutions. By leveraging the flexibility and power of Cypress touch technologies, we provide solutions ranging from low power, two-finger gesture to feature-rich, true multi-touch solutions. Our design library contains solutions that can be used off-the-shelf; in addition, we offer custom product development for specific form factors and features based on customer requirements. These products are ideal for Windows laptop, Google Chromebook, PC peripheral, and remote control applications. Trackpad modules promote fast time-to-market and cost effective solutions for touch-enable end products.

Emerging Technologies and Other (ETD):

Cypress’s Emerging Technology Division consists of businesses outside our core semiconductor business. It includes majority-owned subsidiaries AgigA Tech, Inc., Deca Technologies Inc., foundry services, other development stage activities and certain corporate expenses.

AgigA Tech, Inc. AgigA Tech, a majority-owned and fully independent subsidiary of Cypress, is an industry pioneer in the development of high-speed, high-density, battery-free non-volatile memory solutions. Its flagship product, AGIGARAM®, merges NAND Flash, DRAM and an ultracapacitor power source into a highly reliable non-volatile memory subsystem, delivering unlimited read/write performance at RAM speeds, while also safely backing up all data when power is interrupted. The patent-pending approach couples innovations in power management, high-speed data movement and systems knowledge, while leveraging high-volume, readily available memory technologies to provide a unique non-volatile solution scalable to very high densities. AGIGARAM earned an Edison Award for innovation. Cypress sampled the industry’s first DDR4 Nonvolatile DIMM, which operates in the standard DIMM sockets of next-generation, Intel-based server platforms.

Deca Technologies Inc. (“Deca”). Deca is a majority-owned and fully independent subsidiary of Cypress. Headquartered in Tempe, AZ., with global capabilities, Deca has pioneered a breakthrough approach to wafer level packaging and interconnect technology inspired by SunPower Corporation’s unique solar wafer fabrication methodology. Deca’s initial product offering includes a series of wafer level chip scale packaging (WLCSP) solutions serving several of the top 25 semiconductor producers. Deca’s approach enables industry-leading cycle times, flexibility and value for WLCSP, which is one of the semiconductor industry’s fastest growing electronic interconnect technologies. Sunpower Corporation is a minority investor in Deca. Deca shipped its 100-millionth component in 2014.

Cypress Foundry Solutions. Cypress Foundry Solutions provides both custom and standard foundry services out of the Cypress wafer fabrication facility in Bloomington, MN. This eight-inch wafer fab manufactures in high volume down to the 90nm node. It offers process technologies that integrate Silicon Oxide Nitride Oxide Silicon (SONOS)-based nonvolatile memory and precision analog/mixed-signal capabilities. The facility has been accredited as a Category 1A Trusted Fab for fabrication, design, and testing of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Trusted Microelectronics. Additionally, customers get access to Cypress’s vast design and technology IP portfolio to enable fast time to market.

12


Mergers and Acquisitions

On March 12, 2015, we completed the merger with Spansion Inc. ("Spansion") pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, as of December 1, 2014 (the "merger agreement"), for a total consideration of approximately $2.8 billion. In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, Spansion shareholders received 2.457 Cypress shares for each Spansion share they owned. The merger has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Topic 805, Business Combinations, with Cypress treated as the accounting acquirer. Spansion was a leading designer, manufacturer and developer of embedded systems semiconductors with flash memory, microcontrollers, analog and mixed-signal products. Spansion’s broad portfolio of ARMTM-based microcontrollers complemented the flexible PSoC solutions from Cypress, and Spansion’s leadership in specialty memories enhanced the Cypress memory portfolio creating a global leader in embedded systems.

For additional information on this acquisition, see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

Divestitures

On August 1, 2015, we completed the sale of the TrueTouch® mobile touchscreen business, which is a business unit within our Programmable Systems Division, to Parade Technologies (“Parade”) for total cash proceeds of $98.6 million pursuant to the definitive agreement signed on June 11, 2015. Of the total cash proceeds, $10.0 million are held in an escrow account until January 2017 subject to any indemnity claims on post-closing adjustments, per the terms of the agreement. Post-sale, Cypress will continue to provide TrueTouch® solutions to its automotive, industrial and home appliance customers and to its mobile customers. In connection with the transaction, we sold certain assets associated with the disposed business mostly consisting of inventory with a net book value of $10.5 million and recognized a gain of $66.5 million in the third fiscal quarter of fiscal 2015. This gain has been presented as a separate line item "Gain on divestiture of TrueTouch® mobile business" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Also in connection with the transaction, we entered into a Manufacturing Service Agreement (MSA) in which we agreed to sell finished wafers and devices to Parade during the one-year period following the close of the transaction. The terms of the MSA indicated that we would sell finished products to Parade at agreed-upon prices that were considered below fair market value, indicating that there was an embedded fair value that would be realized by Parade through those terms. Accordingly, we have allocated $19.9 million from the $98.6 million proceeds to the fair value of the MSA based on the forecasted wafer sales to Parade for the subsequent one-year period. Such amount was deferred on our consolidated balance sheet initially and is being amortized to revenue as we sell products to Parade. During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016 we recognized $5.7 million of revenue from amortization of such deferred revenue.

For additional information on this divestiture, see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

Manufacturing

Our core manufacturing strategy-“flexible manufacturing”-combines capacity from external foundries with output from our internal manufacturing facilities. This initiativefacilities which allows us to meet rapid swings in customer demand while limiting capital expenditure requirements and lessening the burden of high fixed costs, a capability that is particularly important with our rapidly evolving product portfolio.

We currently manufacture approximately 50%


As of our semiconductor products at ourthe end of fiscal year 2017, we owned a wafer manufacturing facilitiesfabrication facility in Bloomington, Minnesota and Austin, Texas. External wafer foundries, mainly in Asia, manufactured the balanceapproximately 63% of our products and wewafers. We expect that purchase of wafers as a percentage of our total wafer consumption from our wafer foundry partners will continue to increase their manufacturing as a percentage of total output.

in 2018.


We conduct assembly and test operations at our back-end manufacturing facilities in theCavite, Philippines and Bangkok, Thailand.Thailand, manufacturing volume products and packages, which contribute to better leverage of


manufacturing cost. These facilities account for approximately 42%28% of the total assembly output and 52%38% of the total test output. Various subcontractors in Asia perform the balance of the assembly and test operations.

Our facilities in


We have manufacturing services agreements primarily with the Philippines and Bangkok, Thailand performfollowing partners:

Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. (“ASE”) - Agreements for assembly and test operations,services;
Deca Technologies Inc. - Agreement for manufacturing volume products and packages where our ability to leverage manufacturing costs is high. The Philippines facility has ten fully integrated, automated manufacturing lines enabling complete assembly and test operations (Autolines). These autolines require fewer people to run and have shorter manufacturing cycle times than conventional assembly/test operations, which enable us to respond more rapidly to changes in demand.

13


We have a strategic foundry partnership with HuaHong Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (“Grace”), located in Shanghai, China. Our agreement with them transferred certain proprietary process technologies and provided additional production capacity to augment output from our manufacturing facilities. Since 2007, when we completed the transfer of our 0.35-micron SONOS, 0.13-micron SRAM and LOGIC processes and 0.09-micron SRAM, we have been purchasing products from Grace that are manufactured using these processes. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 6.9 million ordinary shares of Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited (HHSL) for an aggregate price of $10.0 million in connection with their initial public offering. HHSL is the parent company of Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation.

We also have a strategic foundry partnership with United Microelectronics Corporation (“UMC”), located in Taiwan. We use UMC’s 65nm process to produce our leading edge SRAM products which we have been shipping since 2008. Since 2008, we have continuously introduced higher density SRAM products up to 144Mb. We have also utilized UMC’s 65nm baseline to create derivative processes and products including our USB3.0 controllers and Asynchronous SRAMs.  Additionally Cypress and UMC are collaborating on qualifying Cypress’s embedded non-volatile memory technology in UMC’s 55nm and 40nm flows under licensing agreement. These technologies will be used for Cypress’s future generation products and be offered as part of general foundry offering by UMC producing royalty revenue for Cypress.

As part of our acquisition of Ramtron, we acquired a commercial manufacturing agreement for F-RAM products with Texas Instruments (“TI”). Under that agreement, the Company provides certain design, testing and other activities associated with product development, and TI provides certain foundry and related services. As amended on November 30, 2012, the agreement provides for automatic renewals unless written notice of termination is given prior to the end of any renewal period. If notice of termination is given, the agreement terminates one year thereafter and the Company may place last orders and take delivery of product during the following year. The agreement contains various obligations of the parties, including our obligations regarding minimum orders and negotiated pricing of products we purchase.

As part of our merger with Spansion, we acquired agreements with

Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited (“FSL”), XMC and SK Hynix Inc. (“SK Hynix”).- Agreements with FSL include agreements for the supply of product wafer foundry services, sort services and assembly and test services relating to the microcontroller and analog businesses. These agreements are at competitive market rates and enable us to leverage FSL’s existing manufacturing capabilities and relationships with its partners spanning across various technologies, processes, geometries and wafer sizes in their wafer fabrication facilities and package solutions in their back-end manufacturing facilities, until such time that we can either move these internally to our fabrication and back-end facilities or find alternative solutions. For FSL, the fabrication facilities are all located in Japan, while the back-end facilities are in Japan and other Asian countries. The supply agreements do not callservices;
HuaHong Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation ("Grace") - Agreement for any minimum purchase commitments. The arrangement with XMC provides production supportfoundry services;
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation ("SMIC") - Agreements for advanced NOR technology products at 65, 45 and development of 32 nanometers. The arrangement with foundry services;
SK Hynix providesInc. (“SK Hynix”). - Agreements for the development and supply of SLC NAND products at the 4xcertain products;
Skywater Technologies Inc. - Agreement for foundry services;
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacture Company ("TSMC") - Agreement for foundry services;
United Microelectronics Corporation ("UMC") - Agreement for foundry services;
United Test and 3x nodes.

Assembly Center Ltd - Agreement for assembly and test services; and

Wuhan Xinxin Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation ("XMC") - Agreement for foundry services;

Research and Development

Research


Our research and development ("R&D") efforts are focused on the development and design of new semiconductor products, design methodologies, as well as the continued development of advanced software platforms primarily for our programmable solutions. Also included are the consolidated costs of research and development associated with our ETD division.platforms. Our goal is to increase efficiency in order to maintain our competitive advantage. Our research and developmentR&D organization works closely with our manufacturing facilities, suppliers and customers to improve our semiconductor designs and lower our manufacturing costs. During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, research and developmentR&D expenses totaled $281$357.0 million, $164.5$331.2 million and $190.9$274.8 million, respectively.

We have both central and division-specific design groups that focus on new product creation and improvement of design methodologies. These


Our R&D groups conduct ongoing efforts to reduce design cycle time and increase first pass yield through structured re-use of intellectual property blocks from a controlled intellectual property library, development of computer-aided design tools and improved design business processes. Design and related software development work primarily occurs at design centers located in the United States, Europe,Ireland, Germany, Israel, India, Japan and China.

Customers,


Sales and Marketing


We sell our semiconductor products through several channels: sales through global domestically-based distributors; sales through international distributors and manufacturing representative firms; and sales by our sales force directly to direct original equipment manufacturers and their suppliers. Our marketing and sales efforts are organized around five regions: North Americas, Europe, Japan, Korea and China.

14



Our marketing activities target customers, reference design houses and our potential partners; and include a combination of direct marketing activities, such as trade shows, events and marketingsponsored activities. We augment our sales effort with field application engineers, specialists in our products, technologies and services who work with customers to design our products into their systems. Field application engineers also help us identify emerging markets and new products.


Outstanding accounts receivable from threeFujitsu Electronics Inc., one of our distributors accounted for 42%, 11%28% of our consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017 and 9%24%, respectively, of our consolidated accounts receivable as of January 3, 2016. Outstanding accounts receivable from1, 2017.

Revenue generated through Fujitsu Electronics Inc. and Arrow Electronics, two of our distributors, accounted for 12%,20% and 11%13%, respectively, of our consolidated accounts receivable as of December 28, 2014 .

revenues for fiscal 2017. Revenue generated through Fujitsu Electronics Inc., Avnet, Inc., and Arrow electronics, threeone of our distributors, accounted for 25%, 10% and 7%, respectively,23% of our consolidated revenuerevenues for fiscal 2016 and 25% of our consolidated revenues for fiscal 2015. There were no end customers whose total purchases exceeded 10% of our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2015.

Revenue generated through Avnet, Inc., Weikeng Industrial Co. Ltd and Future, Inc., threeone of our distributors, accounted for 13%, 10% and 10%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2014. There were no end customers whose total purchases exceeded 10% of our consolidated revenuerevenues for fiscal 2014.

Revenue generated through Avnet, Inc. and Macnica Inc., two2015. No other distributors or customers accounts for 10% or more of our distributors, accounted for 11% and 10% respectively, of our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013. Samsung Electronics (“Samsung”), an end customer, purchased our products from our distributors and directly from Cypress and accounted for 12% of our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013.

revenue.




Backlog


Our sales typically rely upon standard purchase orders for delivery of products with relatively short delivery lead times. Customer relationships are generally not subject to long-term contracts. However,Although we have entered into long-term supply agreements with certain customers. These long-term supply agreements generally do not contain minimum purchase commitments. Productscustomers, products to be delivered and the related delivery schedulesschedule under these long-term contracts are frequently revised to reflect changes in customer needs.revised. Accordingly, our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily representative of actual sales for any succeeding period and we believe that our backlog is not a meaningful indicator of future revenues.


Competition


The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and continually evolving. This intense competition results in a challenging operating environment for most companies in this industry. This environment is characterized by the potential erosion of product sale prices over the life of each product, rapid technological change, limited product life cycles, greater brand recognition and strong domestic and foreign competition in many markets. Our ability to compete successfully depends on many factors, including:

·

our success in developing new products and manufacturing technologies;

·

delivery, performance, quality and price of our products;

our success in developing new products and manufacturing technologies;

·

diversity of our products and timeliness of new product introductions;

delivery, performance, quality and price of our products;

·

cost effectiveness of our design, development, manufacturing and marketing efforts;

diversity of our products and timeliness of new product introductions;

·

quality of our customer service, relationships and reputation;

cost effectiveness of our design, development, manufacturing and marketing efforts;

·

overall success with which our customers market their products and solutions that incorporate our products; and

quality of our customer service, relationships and reputation;

·

numberoverall success with which our customers market and sell their products and solutions that incorporate our products; and nature of our competitors and general economic conditions.

number and nature of our competitors and general economic conditions.

We face competition from domestic and foreign semiconductor manufacturers, many of which have advanced technological capabilities and have increased their participation in the markets in which we operate. We compete with a large number of companies primarily in the automotive, industrial, communications, consumer, computation, data communications mobile handsets and militarymobile markets. Companies that compete directly with our semiconductor businesses include, but are not limited to, Intel, Analog Devices, Atmel, NXP Semiconductors NV,Adesto, Everspin Technologies, Fujitsu, GigaDevice Semiconductor, GSI Technology, Hynix, Integrated Device Technology, Integrated Silicon Solution, Lattice Semiconductor, Linear Technology, Maxim Integrated Products,Macronix, Marvell, MediaTek, Microchip Technology, Micron Technology, Nordic Semiconductor, NXP Semiconductors NV, Qualcomm, Realtek, Renesas, Richtek, Semtech, Silicon Laboratories, ST Microelectronics, Synaptics, Texas Instruments, Toshiba, VIA Labs, and Xilinx.

15


Winbond.


Environmental Regulations


We use, generate and discharge hazardous chemicals and waste in our research and development and manufacturing activities. United States federal, state and local regulations, in addition to those of other foreign countries in which we operate, impose various environmental rules and obligations, which are becoming increasingly stringent over time, intended to protect the environment and in particular to regulate the management and disposal of hazardous substances. We also face increasing complexity in our product design as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the materials composition of our products, including the restrictions on lead and other hazardous substances that apply to specified electronic products put on the market in the European Union (Restriction on the Use of Hazardous Substances Directive 2002/95/EC, also known as the “RoHS Directive”) and similar legislation in China and California. We are committed to the continual improvement of our environmental systems and controls. However, we cannot provide assurance that we have been, or will at all times be, in complete compliance with all environmental laws and regulations. Other laws impose liability on owners and operators of real property for any contamination of the property even if they did not cause or know of the contamination. While to date we have not experienced any material adverse impact on our business from environmental regulations, we cannot provide assurance that environmental regulations will not impose expensive obligations on us in the future, or otherwise result in the incurrence of liabilityliabilities such as the following:

·

a requirement to increase capital or other costs to comply with such regulations or to restrict discharges;

·

liabilities to our employees and/or third parties; and

a requirement to increase capital or other costs to comply with such regulations or to restrict discharges;

·

business interruptions as a consequence of permit suspensions or revocations or as a consequence of the granting of injunctions requested by governmental agencies or private parties.

liabilities to our employees and/or third parties; and

business interruptions as a consequence of permit suspensions or revocations, or as a consequence of the granting of injunctions requested by governmental agencies or private parties.

Intellectual Property




We have an active program to obtain patent and other intellectual property protection for our proprietary technologies, products and other inventions that are aligned with our strategic initiatives. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks and proprietary information to maintain and enhance our competitive position in the domestic and international markets we serve. As of the end of fiscal 20152017, we had approximately 7,0003,600 issued patents and approximately 1,200700 additional patent applications on file domestically and internationally. In addition, in fiscal 20162018 we are preparing to file up to 9040 new patent applications in the United States and up to 70approximately 50 foreign applicationsapplication predominantly in countries such as China, Taiwan, Korea, Europe and India.Asia. The average remaining life of our domestic patent portfolio is approximately 108.5 years.


In addition to factors such as innovation, technological expertise and experienced personnel, we believe that patents are increasingly important to remain competitive in our industry, defend our position in existing markets and to facilitate the entry of our proprietary products such as PSoC ®, into new markets. As our technologies are deployed in new applications and we face new competitors, we will likely subject ourselves to new potential infringement claims and discover third partythird-party infringement of our intellectual property. Patent litigation, if and when instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources. We are committed to vigorously defending and protecting our investment in our intellectual property. Therefore, the strength of our intellectual property program, including the breadth and depth of our portfolio, will be critical to our success in the new markets we intend to pursue.


We perform an analysis of our intellectual property portfolio on an on-going basis to ensure we are deriving the full value of our assets. Accordingly, we continue to evaluate certain unaligned patents as well as other monetization models for our patent portfolio.

Financial Information about Segments In August 2016, we entered into a series of agreements to divest a large number of older, legacy patents that were not relevant to our current business. Divestiture of these patents will reduce our operating expenses (associated with our patent portfolio) and Geographic Areas

Financial information about segments and geographic area is incorporated herein by referencemay lead to Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

International revenues have historically accounted for a significant portion of our total revenues. Our manufacturing and certain finance operations in the Philippines and Malaysia, as well as our sales and support offices and design centers in other parts of the world, face risks frequently associated with foreign operations, including, but not limited to:

·

currency exchange fluctuations, including the weakening of the U.S. dollar;

future contingent revenue.

·

the devaluation of local currencies;


·

political instability;

Employees

·

labor issues;


·

changes in local economic conditions;

·

import and export controls;

16


·

potential shortage of electric power supply; and

·

changes in tax laws, tariffs and freight rates.

·

potential violations by our international employees or third party agents of international or U.S. laws relevant to foreign operations (such as FCPA) and.

·

access to capital or credit at competitive rates

To the extent any such risks materialize, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be seriously harmed.

Employees

As of January 3, 2016December 31, 2017, we had 6,2796,099 employees. Geographically, 2,1001,946 employees were located in the United States, 1,0411,025 employees were located in the Philippines, 989 in Thailand, 757 in Japan, 257910 employees were located in Malaysia, 472Philippines, 567 employees were located in India, 532 employees were located in Japan, 447 employees were located in Greater China, 244 employees were located in Europe, and 663428 employees were located in other countries. Of the total employees, 3,7153,405 employees were associated with manufacturing, 1,1491,537 employees were associated with research and development, and 1,157 employees were associated with selling, general and administrative functions and 1,415 employees were associated with research and development.

Approximately 475 employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced organized work stoppages.

functions.


Executive Officers of the Registrant as of March 1, 2016

December 31, 2017


Certain information regarding each of our executive officers is set forth below:

Name

Age

Position

T. J. Rodgers

67

NameAgePosition
Hassane El-Khoury38President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thad Trent

48

50

Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer

Dana C. Nazarian

Sudhir Gopalswamy

47

48

Executive Vice President, Microcontroller and Connectivity Division

Sam Geha52Executive Vice President, Memory Products Division

Hassane El-Khoury

Pamela Tondreau

35

58

Executive Vice President, Programmable Systems Division

Chief Legal and Human Resource Officer, Corporate Secretary

T.J. Rodgers

Hassane El-Khourywas named President, Chief Executive Officer and Director at the Company in August 2016. Mr. El-Khoury served as Executive Vice President, Programmable Systems Division, which is a foundernow part of Cypress and has been a Director and itsthe Microcontroller & Connectivity Division (MCD), from 2012 until his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer since 1982.Officer. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Rodgers sits on the board of directors of Cypress’s internal subsidiariesEl-Khoury served as well as Bloom Energy, a privately held fuel cell company. Mr. Rodgers was also a memberSenior Director of the BoardCompany’s Automotive Business Unit. Prior to joining the Company, from 1999 to 2007, Mr. El-Khoury served as Senior Design Engineer at Continental Automotive Designs, a German automotive manufacturing company specializing in tires, brake systems, interior electronics, automotive safety, powertrain and chassis components, tachographs, and other parts for the automotive and transportation industry. Mr. El-Khoury holds a Bachelor of TrusteesScience degree in Electrical Engineering


from Lawrence Technological University and a Master of Dartmouth College until June 2012.

Sciences degree in Engineering Management from Oakland University.


Thad Trenthas been the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance & Administration at Cypress Semiconductor Corporationthe Company since June 2014. Prior to his current position, Mr. Trent served as Cypress’sjoined Cypress in 2005 and had been Vice President of Finance.Finance since 2010. Prior to serving as the Chief Financial Officer at the Company, he led the strategic planning functions for the Company’s business units and worldwide operations and he managed the financial reporting, accounting, and planning and analysis functions for the Company. Before joining the Company, Mr. Trent is a 22-year veteran of the technology industry. He, held finance managementleadership roles at publicly traded companies Wind River Systems and Wyle Electronics, as well as two technology startups. He also serves as a director on AgigA Tech, Inc., a Company subsidiary, and Deca Technologies, Inc., a majority-owned Company subsidiary. Mr. Trent joined Cypressearned his Bachelor of Science in 2005Business Administration and served as Vice President of Finance since 2010. Most recently, he has led the finance activities for business units, sales and marketing, and distribution groups, and he has supervised financial reporting, accounting, and planning and analysis.  Mr. Trent sits on the board of directors of Cypress’s internal subsidiaries.at San Diego State University.

Dana C. Nazarian


Sudhir Gopalswamy was named Executive Vice President of Memory Productsthe Microcontroller and Connectivity Division (MCD) at the Company in February 2009. Mr. Nazarian started his career with Cypress in 1988. Prior to his current position, Mr. Nazarian held various management positions, which included oversight of significant operations in our former Round Rock, Texas facility and2018, having previously been named as the Senior Vice President of ourMCD in September 2016, for which he is responsible for all aspects of the MCD business. Mr. Gopalswamy joined the Company in 2008 and has managed a variety of business units, including the Timing Solutions Business Unit, the Synchronous SRAM business unit.Business Unit and most recently the MCU Business Unit, where he also served as a Senior Vice President. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gopalswamy worked at Conexant, where he was responsible for the cable set-top box product line. Before Conexant, he spent nine years at Intel Corporation, during which he held management and leadership roles of increasing responsibility, spanning the computing, communications/networking and consumer electronics segments. Mr. Gopalswamy holds a BSEE in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University and an MBA from Duke University.

Hassane El-Khoury


Sam Geha, Ph.D., was named Executive Vice presidentPresident of the Programmable SystemsMemory Product Division at the Company in February 2018, having previously been named as the Senior Vice President of the Memory Product Division in 2012.September 2016. Previously, he was named as the Senior Vice President of the Intellectual Property (IP) Business Unit in June 2015, having managed the IP Business Unit since June 2013, where he oversaw licensing of the Company’s various embedded nonvolatile memory technologies (SONOS and eCT) to foundries, including UMC, HLMC and HH-Grace, as well as licensing the Company’s 3D NAND technology to XMC. Prior to his current position,that, he was the Vice President of the Technology R&D organization since May 2007. He also serves as a board member of Enovix, a Silicon-based Lithium Ion battery start-up. Mr. El-KhouryGeha joined the Company in 1995 and has served as Cypress’s Automotive Business Unitthe senior director of technology development for SONOS and the director of technology development for MRAM and SRAM technologies. Prior to joining the Company, he worked in various technology development functions at Motorola and National Semiconductor. Mr. Geha holds a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering (BSEE), a master of science in electrical engineering (MSEE) and a philosophical doctorate in electrical engineering (Ph.D.) from the University of Arizona.

Pamela L. Tondreau was named Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Human Resources Officer, and Corporate Secretary at the Company in February 2018, having previously been named as the Chief Legal and Human Resources Officer in November 2017. Ms. Tondreau has continued to serve as the Corporate Secretary, having previously been named as the Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in September 2016. She joined the Company in 2014, and began serving as the Senior Director since 2010. After workingVice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in January 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Tondreau spent 13 years at Hewlett-Packard Company (now HP Inc.) in various roles, including Chief Intellectual Property Counsel and Deputy General Counsel to the Chief Technology Officer, HP Labs, HP Networking, IP Licensing, Strategic Initiatives and Global Alliances. In addition, she supported the Chief Marketing Officer, the Chief Information Officer and the Executive Vice President of Personal Systems, as well as serving as Corporate Secretary to the Technology Committee of Hewlett-Packard’s board of directors. Prior to her time at Hewlett-Packard, Ms. Tondreau was an engineerassociate at Continental Automotive Systems, he joined Cypress’s automotive business unitthe law firm of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges (now Thelen LLP), serving as both a litigation and expanded the Company’s presence in the Human-Machine Interfacecorporate attorney. Ms. Tondreau holds a bachelor’s degree from U.C. Berkeley and Body Electronics segmentsa J.D. from McGeorge School of the automotive marketplace.Law.


Available Information


We make available our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, free of charge on our website at www.cypress.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). By referring to our website, we do not incorporate such website or its contents into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Additionally, copies of materials filed by us with the SEC may be accessed at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 or at www.sec.gov. For information about the SEC’s Public Reference Room, contact 1-800-SEC-0330.

17



ITEM 1A.

RISKRISK FACTORS


Unfavorable economic and market conditions, domestically and internationally, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


We have significant customer sales both in the U.S. and internationally. We are also reliant upon U.S. and international suppliers, manufacturing partners and distributors. We are therefore susceptible to adverse U.S. and international economic and market conditions. If any of our manufacturing partners, customers, distributors or suppliers experience serious financial difficulties or cease operations, our business will be adversely affected. In addition, the adverse impact of an unfavorable economy on consumers, including high unemployment rates, may adversely impact consumer spending, which will adversely impact demand for consumer products such as certain end products in which our products are embedded. In addition, prices of certain commodities, including oil, metals, grains and other food products, are subject to fluctuations arising from changes in domestic and international supply and demand, labor costs, competition, market speculation, government regulations and periodic delays in delivery. High or volatile commodity prices increase the cost of doing business and adversely affect consumers’ discretionary spending. As a result of the difficulty that businesses (including our customers) may have in obtaining credit, the increasing and/or volatile costs of commodities and the decreased consumer spending that may result from weakness in the general global economy, global economic and market turmoil are likely to have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


The trading price of our common stock has been and will likely continue to be volatile due to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, and each of which could adversely affect our stockholders’ value.


The trading price of our common stock has been and will likely continue to be volatile due to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:

·

Revenue fluctuations due to unexpected shifts in customer orders;

·

Announcements about our earnings or the earnings of our competitors that are not in line with analyst expectations;

Revenue fluctuations due to unexpected shifts in customer demand;

·

Our ability to achieve the planned synergies in the recent merger with Spansion;

Announcements about our earnings or the earnings of our competitors that are not in line with analyst expectations;

·

Credit conditions and our ability to refinance our existing debt at commercially reasonable terms, which may limit the Company’s working capital;

Our ability to execute on our long term strategic corporate transformation initiatives, collectively known as our Cypress 3.0 initiatives, and our gross margin improvement plan;

·

Quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;

Credit conditions and our ability to refinance our existing debt at commercially reasonable terms, which may limit the Company’s working capital;

·

Announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, design wins, commercial relationships or capital commitments;

Quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;

·

The perceptions of general market conditions in the semiconductor industry and global market conditions;

Announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, design wins, commercial relationships or capital commitments;

·

Our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

The perceptions of general market conditions in the semiconductor industry (including recent trends toward consolidation in the semiconductor industry) and global market conditions;

·

Any major change in our board or senior management;

Our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

·

Changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory compliance that impact our business;

Any major change in our board or senior management;

·

Recommendations by securities analysts or changes in earnings estimates concerning us or our customers or competitors;

Changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory compliance that impact our business;

·

The volume of short sales, hedging and other derivative transactions on shares of our common stock;

Recommendations by securities analysts or changes in earnings estimates concerning us or our customers or competitors;

·

Economic conditions and growth expectations in the markets we serve;

The volume of short sales, hedging and other derivative transactions on shares of our common stock;

·

Changes in our policy regarding dividends or our ability to declare a dividend; and

Economic conditions and growth expectations in the markets we serve;

·

Our ability to execute our lean inventory initiative to reduce excess inventory, which could lead to a disruption in the supply of our products and adversely affect our business.

Changes in our policy regarding dividends or our ability to declare a dividend;

Changes in our policy regarding stock repurchases or our ability to repurchase shares of our common stock;
Supply disruption or price increases from third-party manufacturing partners;
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to repay debt and
Litigation, including any disputes or legal proceedings associated with activist investors.




Further, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources. Finally, our executive officers, who may hold a substantial number of shares of our common stock, may from time to time pledge all or a portion of their holdings as collateral or include such holdings in margin accounts. If our stock price were to drop suddenly, such margin accounts could be called and the shares in such accounts may be automatically sold by a third party in the open market, even during a blackout period.

18


We may in the future incur impairments in the value of our goodwill, intangibles and property, plant and equipment.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination.  We test goodwill for impairment annually, and more frequently when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.  Additionally, our other long-lived assets which include intangibles and property, plant and equipment are evaluated for impairments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Either of these situations may occur for various reasons, including changes in actual or expected income or cash.  We continue to evaluate current conditions to assess whether any impairment exists.   Impairments could occur in the future if any of the following occur: market or interest rate environments deteriorate, significant adverse changes in business climate, unanticipated competition, loss of key customers, changes in technology, expected future cash flows of our reporting units decline, or reporting unit carrying values change materially compared with changes in respective fair values.


We utilize debt financing and such indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and earnings per share and our abilityshare. We may be unable to meet our payment obligations.


We routinely incur indebtedness to finance our operations and from time to time we have significantsubstantial amounts of outstanding indebtedness and substantial debt service requirements. Our amended and restated senior secured credit facility with a group of lenders led by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., provides for a $540 million revolving credit facility and a $100 million term loan. The credit facility contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations and covenants under our indebtedness depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control. There is no assurance that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our existing or(or any amendedamended) credit facilities or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet payment obligations under any indebtedness we may under takeincur from time to time. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations or meet required debt covenants, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that we will be able to implement any of these alternatives on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under any indebtedness we owe. In addition, an inability to meet our payment obligations under any indebtedness may trigger a default, and possible acceleration of payment terms, under the applicable debt financing agreements.

Furthermore, the interest rate on certain of these instruments is tied to short term interest rate benchmarks including the Prime Rate and LIBOR.  Interest rates have remained at historically low levels for a prolonged period of time and we expect interest rates to rise in the future. If the rate of interest we pay on our borrowings increases it would increase our debt-related expenditures.  There is no assurance that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our existing (or any amended) credit facilities or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet payment obligations (including any increased interest payment obligations) under any indebtedness we may incur from time to time.

As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, our outstanding debt, included $449.0net of cost, primarily included:
$90.0 million related to our Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility $150 million of 2% Senior Exchange notes assumed from Spansion, $97.2
$495.4 million Term Loan A, net of costs, $7.2B
$131.4 million of capital leasesour 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes
$246.6 million of our 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes and $3.0
$20.4 million of equipment loans.  our 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes

See Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information onregarding our Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, 2.0% Senior Exchange notes assumed from Spansion and our Term Loan A and Note 19 on our capital leases.

debt obligations.


If we fail to compete successfully in our highly competitive industry and markets, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be seriously harmed.


The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive. This intense competition results in a difficult operating environment that is marked by erosion of average selling prices over the life of each product and rapid technological change resulting in limited product life cycles. In order to offset selling price decreases, we attempt to decrease the manufacturing costs of our products and to introduce new, higher priced products that incorporate advanced features. If these efforts are not successful or do not occur in a timely manner, or if our newly introduced products do not gain market acceptance, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.


Our ability to compete successfully in the rapidly evolving semiconductor industry depends on many factors, including:

·

our success in developing and marketing new products, software platforms and manufacturing technologies and bringing them to market on a timely basis;

·

the quality and price of our products;

our ability to successfully execute on our long term strategic corporate transformation initiatives, collectively known as our Cypress 3.0 initiatives;

·

the pace at which customers incorporate our products into their systems, as is sometimes evidenced by design wins;


·

the diversity of our product lines;


·

the cost effectiveness of our design, development, manufacturing, support and marketing efforts, especially as compared to our competitors;

our success in developing and marketing new products, software platforms and manufacturing technologies and bringing them to market on a timely basis;

·

our success in developing and introducing firmware in a timely manner;

the quality and price of our products, and our ability to meet the specification requirements of our customers;

·

our customer service and customer satisfaction;

the willingness of our customer base to absorb any increase in the price that we sell our products;

·

our ability to successfully execute our flexible manufacturing strategy;

the pace at which customers incorporate our products into their systems, as is sometimes evidenced by design wins;

·

the number, strength and nature of our competitors, the markets they target and the rate and success of their technological advances;

19


·

the success of certain of our development activity which is a part of our Emerging Technologies business segment;

the diversity of our product lines;

·

our ability to get competitive terms with our vendors, manufacturing partners and suppliers;

the cost effectiveness of our design, development, manufacturing, support and marketing efforts, especially as compared to our competitors;

·

general economic conditions; and

our success in developing and introducing firmware in a timely manner;

·

our access to and the availability of working capital.

our customer service and customer satisfaction;

our ability to successfully execute our flexible manufacturing strategy;
the number, strength and nature of our competitors, the markets they target and the rate and success of their technological advances;
the success of certain of our development activity including our investments in internal and external development stage startups;
our ability to get competitive terms with our vendors, manufacturing partners and suppliers;
general economic conditions;
the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry;
our ability to maintain supply of products from third party manufacturers; and
our access to and the availability of working capital.

Although we believe we currently compete effectively in the above areas to the extent they are within our control, given the pace of change in our industry (including recent trends toward consolidation in the industry), our current abilities are not guarantees of future success. If we are unable to compete successfully in this environment, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be seriously harmed.

We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of our acquisition of Spansion

On March 12, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Spansion. The success of the transaction will depend, in part, on our ability to achieve the anticipated cost synergies and other strategic benefits from combining the businesses of Cypress and Spansion. We expect to benefit from operational synergies resulting from the consolidation of capabilities and elimination of redundancies as well as greater efficiencies from increased scale, market integration and more automation. However, to realize these anticipated benefits, we must successfully combine the businesses of Cypress and Spansion. If we are not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated cost synergies and other strategic benefits of the transaction may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. We may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the transaction in the amounts and times projected for a number of reasons, including that the integration may take longer than anticipated or be more costly than anticipated.

The failure to integrate successfully the businesses and operations of Cypress and Spansion in the expected time frame may adversely affect our future results.

Prior to the completion of the transaction, Cypress and Spansion historically operated as independent companies. Our management may face significant challenges in consolidating the functions of Cypress and Spansion and their subsidiaries, integrating their technologies, organizations, ERP systems, procedures, policies and operations, as well as addressing differences in the business cultures of the two companies and retaining key personnel. In connection with the acquisition, we are integrating certain operations of Cypress and Spansion, including, among other things, back-office operations, information technology and regulatory compliance. The integration of the two companies will be complex and time consuming, and require substantial resources and effort. The integration process and other disruptions resulting from the transaction may disrupt each company’s ongoing businesses or cause inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our relationships with our members and other market participants, employees, regulators and others with whom we have business or other dealings. If we fail to manage the integration of these businesses effectively, our growth strategy and future profitability could be negatively affected, and we may fail to achieve the intended benefits of the transaction.

We have incurred costs in connection with our acquisition of Spansion and will continue to incur costs in connection with the transaction.

We have incurred significant costs associated with transaction fees, professional services and other costs related to the transaction and we will continue to incur additional costs, including restructuring costs, in connection with the integration of the business. Specifically, through January 3, 2016, we have incurred $84.6 million for costs in addition to restructuring and other items associated with the merger and integration. Although we expect that the realization of efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses will offset merger-related and restructuring costs over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all.


We face significant volatility in supply and demand conditions for our products, and this volatility, as well as any failure by us to accurately forecast future supply and demand conditions, could materially and negatively impact our business.


The semiconductor industry has historically been characterized by wide fluctuations in the demand for, and supply of, semiconductors. Demand for our products depends in large part on the continued growth of various electronics industries that use our products, including, but not limited to:

·

automotive applications including advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), instrument clusters, infotainment systems, body electronics, HVAC controls, event data recorders, powertrains and electric vehicle/hybrid-electric vehicle systems;

·

industrial systems including factory automation equipment, smart electric meters, aerospace, industrial controls, point-of-sale terminals and test equipment

automotive applications including advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), instrument clusters, infotainment systems, body electronics, connectivity, HVAC controls, event data recorders;

·

consumer electronics including wearable electronics, smartphones, gaming consoles, gamepads, remote controls, toys, presenter tools, TVs, set-top boxes and fitnessindustrial systems including factory automation equipment, smart electric meters, aerospace, industrial controls, point-of-sale terminals and test equipment;

·

wireless telecommunications equipment;

20


·

computers and computer-related peripherals;

Wireless products including smart home applications, health and fitness, audio, automotive, medical device and industrial devices;

·

medicalconsumer electronics including wearable electronics, smartphones and other mobile devices, gaming consoles, game-pads, remote controls, toys, presenter tools, TVs, set-top boxes and fitness equipment; and

·

networking equipment.

wireless telecommunications equipment;

computers and computer-related peripherals;
medical equipment; and
networking equipment.

Any downturn, shift in product launch schedule or reduction in the growth of these industries could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, our TrueTouch family of products is highly concentrated in consumer handset markets which are susceptible to changesFurther, pricing in the general economy, consumer acceptance, design wins, competitionsemiconductor industry is subject to significant volatility. As an example, pricing of memory products during fiscal 2017 was significantly impacted by industry conditions. We may be unable to anticipate or manage price volatility which may adversely impact our margins, market share, financial condition and price.

results of our operations.


We order materials and build our products based primarily on our internal forecasts, customer and distributor forecasts and secondarily on existing orders, which may be cancelledcanceled under many circumstances. Because our markets can be volatile, are based on consumer demand and subject to rapid technological and price changes, our forecasts may be inaccurate, causing us to make too many or too few of certain products.

Also, our




Our customers frequently place orders requesting product delivery almost immediately after the order is made, which makes forecasting customer demand even more difficult, particularly when supply is abundant. In addition, demand for our products could be materially different from our expectations due to changes in customer order patterns, including order deferrals or cancellations. If we experience inadequate demand, order cancellations, or a significant shift in the mix of product orders that makes our existing capacity and capability inadequate, our fixed costs per semiconductor produced will increase, which will harm our financial condition and results of operations.

Alternatively, if we should experience a sudden increase in demand, we will need to quickly ramp our inventory and/or manufacturing capacity to adequately respond to our customers. If we or our manufacturing partners are unable to ramp our inventory or manufacturing capacity in a timely manner or at all, we risk losing our customers’ business, which could have a negative impact on our financial performance and reputation.


If we fail to develop, introduce and sell new products or fail to develop and implement new technologies, our ability to compete in our end markets will suffer and our financial results could be adversely impacted.

Like many semiconductor companies, which operate in a highly competitive, quickly changing environment marked by rapid obsolescence of existing products, our future success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products that customers choose to buy. Our new products, for example PSoC®PSoC® products, BLE, USB-Type C, Traveoour wireless connectivity products, USB-C, and our ETD companiesTraveo™ microcontroller products, are an important strategic focus for us and therefore, they tend to consume a significant amount of our resources. The new products the market requires tend to be increasingly complex, incorporating more functions including software and security and operating at faster speeds than old products.

Increasing complexity generally requires smalleradditional features on a smaller chip. This makes manufacturing new generations of products substantially more difficult, more costly and more time consuming than prior generations.


Despite the significant amount of resources, we commit to new products, there can be no guarantee that such products will perform as expected or at all, be introduced on time to meet customer schedules or gain market acceptance. If we fail to introduce new product designs or technologies in a timely manner, or are unable to manufacture products according to thethese design requirements, of these designs, or if our customers do not successfully introduce new systems or products incorporating our products or if market demand for our new products does not materialize as anticipated, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.


The complex nature of our manufacturing activities, our broad product portfolio, and our increasing reliance on third-party manufacturers makes us highly susceptible to manufacturing problems and these problems can have a substantial negative impact on us if they occur.

Making


Manufacturing semiconductors is a highly complex and precise process, requiring production in a tightly controlled, clean environment.clean-room environments. Even very small impurities in our manufacturing materials, defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer or other problems in the wafer fabrication process can cause a substantial percentage of wafersproducts to be rejected or numerous chips on each wafer toand be non-functional. We and, similarly, our third partythird-party foundry partners, may experience problems in achieving an acceptable success rate in the manufacture of wafers and the likelihood of facing such difficulties is higher in connection with the transition to new manufacturing methods. The interruption of wafer fabrication, ora reduction in available wafer supply, the failure to achieve acceptable manufacturing yields, or the inability to achieve acceptable levels of quality and security in our products as expected by our customers, including our customers in the automotive industry, at any of our facilities, or the facilities of our third-party foundry partners, would seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. This risk may be exacerbated by our recent divestiture and future divestitures of any of our manufacturing facilities, as we would be increasing our reliance on third-party partners in that situation.

In March 2017, we completed the sale of our semiconductor wafer fabrication facility in Bloomington, Minnesota.
The purchaser intends to operate the fabrication facility as a stand-alone business that will manufacture wafers for Cypress and for other semiconductor manufacturers. Although this transaction allows us to reduce our manufacturing footprint, it will increase our reliance on third-party suppliers. Accordingly, if the new owner of our Bloomington fabrication facility is unable to effectively operate the facility, faces financial difficulty, or is otherwise unable to meet our product demands, our supply of components may be adversely affected. Such events could lead to difficulties in delivering products to our customers on time and have a negative impact on our revenue and financial results.



We may also experience manufacturing problems in our assembly and test operations (or the assembly and test operations of third-party partners) and in the introduction of new packaging materials.

21




We are increasingly dependent uponon third parties to manufacture products, distribute products, generate a significant portion of our product sales, fulfill our customer orders and transport our product.products. Problems in the performance or availability of these companies could seriously harm our financial performance.

Although many of our products are fabricated in our manufacturing facilities located in Minnesota, Austin, Malaysia and the Philippines, we


We rely to a significant extentsignificantly on independent contractors to manufacture, and assemblewhich includes assembly of, our products. In addition, ifin March 2017, we divested our manufacturing facility located in Minnesota, which reduces our internal manufacturing capacity.

If market demand for our products exceeds our internal manufacturing capacity and available capacity from our foundry partners, we may seek additional foundry manufacturing arrangements.


A shortage in foundry manufacturing capacity, which is more likely to occur at times of increasing demand, could hinder our ability to meet demand for our products and therefore adversely affect our operating results. Suppliers may extend lead times, limit supplies or increase prices due to commodity price increases, capacity constraints or other factors, which may lead to interruption of supply which could materially harm our results of operations. In addition, greater demand for wafers produced by any such foundries without an offsetting increase in foundry capacity raises the likelihood of potential wafer price increases. Our operations would be disrupted if any of our foundry partners terminates its relationship with us or hasexperiences financial issuesdifficulty and we are unable to arrange a satisfactory alternative to fulfill customer orders on a timely basis and in a cost-effective manner. There are also only a few foundry vendors that have the capabilities to manufacture our most advanced products. If we engage alternative sources of supply, we may encounter start-up difficulties, yield issues or incur additional costs. Shipments could be delayed significantly while these sources are qualified for volume production.


While a high percentagemany of our products are assembled, packaged and tested at our manufacturing facilities located in the Philippines and Malaysia,Thailand, we rely on independent subcontractors to assemble, package and test the balance of our products. We cannot be certain that these subcontractors will continue to assemble, package and test products for us on acceptable economic and quality terms or at all and it might be difficult for us to find alternatives if they do not do so.


Our foundry partners and assembly and test subcontractors have operations in locations that may suffer the impact of certain natural disasters and political risk, which could impact their ability to provide us with our products. We monitor these events closely, but if one of our third partythird-party manufacturing partners were to suffer significant damage to its operations as a result of a natural disaster or other catastrophic events, our ability to timely meet consumer demand would suffer which would materially harm our results of operations.


Our channel partners include distributors and resellers. We continue to expand and change our relationships with our distributors. Worldwide sales through our distributors accounted for approximately 71%73% of our net sales in fiscal year 2015.2017. We rely on many distributors to assist us in creating customer demand, providing technical support and other value-added services to our customers, filling customer orders and stocking our products. We face ongoing business risks due to our reliance on our channel partners to create and maintain customer relationships where we have a limited or no direct relationship. Should our relationships with our channel partners or their effectiveness decline, we face the risk of declining demand which could affect our revenue and results of operations. Our contracts with our distributors may be terminated by either party upon notice. The termination of a significant distributor or a reseller could (a) impact our revenue and limit our access to certain end-customers, (b) result in the return of a material amount of inventory held by the distributor or reseller that we may not be able to resell or have to resell at a loss, and (c) jeopardize our ability to collect accounts receivable originating through that distributor or reseller. In addition, our distributors are located all over the world and are of various sizes and financial conditions.strength. Any disruptions to our distributors’ operations such as lower sales, lower earnings, debt downgrades, the inability to access capital markets andand/or higher interest rates could have an adverse impact on our business.


We also rely on independent carriers and freight haulers to move our products between manufacturing plants and our customers’ facilities. Transport or delivery problems due to their error or because of unforeseen interruptions in their business due to factors such as strikes, political instability, terrorism, natural disasters or accidents could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations and ultimately impact our relationship with our customers.



We may not be able to consume minimum commitments under our “take or pay” agreements, which may have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

We have entered into agreements with certain vendors that include "take or pay" terms. Take or pay terms obligate us to purchase a minimum required amount of services or make specified payments in lieu of such purchase. We may not be able to consume minimum commitments under these take or pay terms, requiring payments to vendors, which may have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

Failures in our products or in the products of our customers including those resulting from security vulnerabilities, defects or errors, could harm our business.

The use of devices containing our products to access untrusted content create a risk of exposing the products into viral or malicious risks. While we continue to focus on this issue and are taking measures to safeguard our products from cybersecurity threats, device capabilities continue to evolve, enabling more data and processes, such as computing, and increasing the risk of security failures. Further, our products are inherently complex and may contain defects or errors that are detected only when the products are in use. The design process interface in new domains of technology and the migration to integrated circuit technologies with smaller geometric feature sizes are complex and add risk to manufacturing yields and reliability. Further, manufacturing, testing, marketing and use of our products and those of our customers entail the risk of product liability. Because our products and services are responsible for critical functions in our customers’ products, security failures, defects or errors in our products or services could have an adverse impact on us, on our customers and/or on the end users of our customers’ products. Such adverse impact could include product liability claims or recalls, write-offs of our inventories, property, plant and equipment and/or intangible assets; unfavorable purchase commitments; a shift of business to our competitors; a decrease in demand for our products; damage to our reputation and to our customer relationships; and other financial liability or harm to our business. Further, security failures, defects or errors in the products of our customers could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and/or cash flows due to a delay or decrease in demand for our products generally.

System security risks, data protection or privacy breaches, cyber-attacks and systems integration issues could disrupt our internal operations and/or harm the reputation of the Company, and any such disruption or harm could cause a reduction in our expected revenue, increase our expenses, negatively impact our results of operation or otherwise adversely affect our stock price.

Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential and proprietary information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions and delays that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions.

We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our business on the cloud. Breaches of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data about us, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our brand and reputation or otherwise harm our business. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of implementing further data protection measures could be significant.

Portions of our IT infrastructure also may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with systems integration or migration work that takes place from time to time. We may not be successful in implementing new systems and transitioning data, which could cause business disruptions and be more expensive, time consuming, disruptive and resource-intensive than originally anticipated. Such disruptions could adversely impact our ability to fulfill orders and interrupt other processes. Delayed sales, lower margins or lost customers resulting from these disruptions have adversely affected us in the past, and in the future, could adversely affect our financial results, stock price and reputation.




We are in the process of implementing our worldwide business application suite, and difficulties, distraction or disruption may interrupt our normal operations and adversely affect our business and operating results.

During fiscal year 2017, we devoted significant resources to the upgrade of our worldwide business application suite from Oracle's version 11i to Oracle's version R12. We plan to go live with the upgrade in Q1 fiscal 2018. As a result of our transition to the new business application suite, we may experience difficulties with our systems, lack of visibility into our business operations and results, and significant business disruptions. Difficulties with our systems may interrupt our normal operations, including our enterprise resource planning, forecasting, demand planning supply planning, inter-company processes, internal financial controls, pricing, and our ability to provide quotes, process orders, ship products, provide services and support to our customers, bill and track our customers, fulfill contractual obligations, and otherwise run and track our business. Any difficulty or disruption may adversely affect our business and operating results.

Changes in U.S. and international tax legislation and tax policy could materially impact our business.

A majority of our revenue is generated from customers located outside the U.S. and a substantial portion of our assets, including employees, are located outside the U.S. In the past, tax administrations globally have considered initiatives which could substantially eliminate utilization or reduce our ability to claim net operating losses and foreign tax credits, and eliminate various tax deductions. If any of these proposals are constituted into law, they could have a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

We are subject to income tax, and from time to time, examinations by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, U.S. local tax administrations, and similar proceedings in foreign jurisdictions in which we do business. As a result, we may incur additional costs and expenses, and owe additional taxes, interest and penalties which will negatively impact our operating results and cash flows. The results of these U.S. and certain foreign jurisdiction examinations may also decrease our current estimate of unrecognized tax benefits.

Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. The U.S. recently enacted significant tax reform. We are still evaluating the impact, but certain provisions such as the base erosion anti-abuse tax provision of the new law may adversely affect us. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, also recently released guidance covering various topics, including country-by-country reporting, definitional changes to permanent establishment and Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, or BEPS, an initiative that aims to standardize and modernize global tax policy. Depending on the final guidance, if any, there may be significant consequences for the Company due to the large scale of our international business activities.

If the tax incentive or tax holiday arrangements we have negotiated in Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand change or cease to be in effect or applicable, in part or in whole, for any reason, or if our assumptions and interpretations regarding tax laws and incentive or holiday arrangements prove to be incorrect, the amount of corporate income taxes we have to pay could significantly increase.

We have structured our operations to maximize the benefit from various tax incentives and tax holidays extended to the Company in various jurisdictions to encourage investment or employment. Each tax incentive is separate and distinct from the others, and may be granted, withheld, extended, modified, truncated, complied with or terminated independently without any effect on the other incentives. The tax incentives are presently scheduled to expire at various dates generally beginning in 2018, subject in certain cases to potential extensions, which we may or may not be able to obtain. Absent these tax incentives, the corporate income tax rate in these jurisdictions that would otherwise apply to us would be between 20% and 30%. The tax incentives that we have negotiated are also subject to our compliance with various operating and other conditions. If we cannot, or elect not to, comply with the operating conditions included in any particular tax incentive, we will lose the related tax benefits and we could be required to refund previously realized material tax benefits. Depending on the incentive at issue, we could also be required to modify our operational structure and tax strategy, which may not be as beneficial to us as the benefits provided under the present tax concession arrangements. Our interpretations and conclusions regarding the tax incentives are not binding on any taxing authority, and if our assumptions about tax and other laws are incorrect or if these tax incentives are substantially modified or rescinded we could suffer material adverse tax and other financial consequences, which could adversely affect our cash flows.




We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that, if not remediated, could adversely affect investor confidence and our business, results of operations and stock price.
As disclosed in Item 9A of this report, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 related to management’s controls over accounting for stock-based compensation, especially the controls over the accounting for our employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result of the material weakness identified, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2017. We are actively engaged in implementing a remediation plan designed to address this material weakness. However, we cannot provide any assurance that these remediation efforts will be successful or that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a result of these efforts. If our remediation measures are insufficient to address this material weakness, or if additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements, which could require us to restate our consolidated financial statements. Any restatement of our consolidated financial statements could negatively impact investor confidence and could lead to litigation against us, which could be time-consuming, costly or divert significant operational resources, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of our operations and stock price.

We may dispose of certain businesses, product lines or assets, which could adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

From time to time, we may divest certain businesses, product lines or assets, both acquired or otherwise, that are no longer strategically important, or we may exit minority investments, which could materially affect our cash flows and results of operations. If we decide to divest a business, product line or assets, we may encounter difficulty in finding or completing such divestiture opportunity (or alternative exit strategy) on acceptable terms or in a timely manner. These circumstances could delay the achievement of our strategic objectives or cause us to incur additional expenses with respect to the business, product line or assets that we seek to dispose. In addition, any delay in the timing of a divestiture transaction may negatively impact our business operations or liquidity for a period of time. Alternatively, we may dispose of businesses, product lines or assets at prices or on terms that are less favorable than we had anticipated. Even following a divestiture, we may be contractually obligated with respect to certain continuing obligations to customers, vendors, landlords or other third parties. Accordingly, we may be dependent on the new owner (of such business, product line or manufacturing facility) to fulfill our continuing obligations to our customers. We may also have continuing obligations for pre-existing liabilities related to the divested assets or businesses. Such obligations may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Any such dispositions could also result in disruption to other parts of our business, potential loss of employees or customers (especially if the new owner is unable or unwilling to assist us in fulfilling any continuing obligations to our customers), potential loss of revenue, negative impact on our margins, exposure to unanticipated liabilities or result in ongoing obligations and liabilities to us following any such divestiture. We may also incur significant costs associated with exit or disposal activities, related impairment charges, or both.

We cannot be assured that our restructuring initiatives will be successful.

From time to time, we have implemented restructuring plans to reduce our operating costs and/or shift our expenditures to different areas of our business. However, if we have not sufficiently reduced operating expenses or if revenues are below our expectations, we may be required to engage in additional restructuring activities, which could result in additional restructuring charges. These restructuring charges could harm our results of operations. Further, our restructuring plans could result in potential adverse effects on employee capabilities, on our ability to achieve design wins, and our ability to maintain and enhance our customer base. Such events could harm our efficiency and our ability to act quickly and effectively in the rapidly changing technology markets in which we sell our products. In addition, we may be unsuccessful in our efforts to realign our organizational structure and shift our investments and focus to our high-growth businesses.



Our financial results could be adversely impacted if privately-held companies (that we have invested in) fail to develop and successfully bring to market new and proprietary products.

We have made a financial commitment to certain investments in privately-held companies. Despite the significant amount of resources, we commit to these companies, there can be no guarantee that such businesses will perform as expected or at all, launch new products and solutions as expected or gain market acceptance. If these privately-held companies fail to introduce new products and solutions or successfully develop new technologies, or if customers do not successfully introduce new systems or products incorporating the products or solutions offered by these businesses or if market demand for the products or solutions offered by these businesses do not materialize as anticipated or if these privately-held companies are not able to raise capital to fund their operations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed as a result of impairment of the carrying value of our investments in such privately-held companies.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we incurred an other-than-temporary impairment charge for our investment in Enovix Corporation.

Acquisitions and investments could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other harmful consequences that may adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Acquisitions are an important element of our overall corporate strategy and use of capital. These transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. We expect to continue to evaluate and enter into discussions regarding a wide array of potential strategic transactions. The process of integrating an acquired company, business, or technology has created, and will continue to create, unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The areas where we face risks include, but are not limited to:
Diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to integration challenges;
Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization, and retention of employees from the businesses we acquire;
Successfully transitioning the current customer, supplier, foundry and other partnering relationships of the acquired company;
Implementation or remediation of controls, procedures, and policies at the acquired company;
Integration of the acquired company’s accounting, human resource, and other administrative systems, and coordination of product, engineering, and sales and marketing functions;
In the case of acquired companies with global operations, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific countries;
Failure to successfully further develop the acquired business or technology;
Liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including intellectual property infringement claims, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities, and other known and unknown liabilities; and
Pending litigation or other known or unknown claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims by stockholders for breach of fiduciary duties, terminated employees, customers, former stockholders, or other third parties.

Our failure to address these and other risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or current acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities, and harm our business generally. Current and future acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition or results. As a result, the anticipated benefit of any of our acquisitions may not be realized.

In 2016, we incurred a material impairment charge with respect to our goodwill, and we may in the future incur impairments in the value of our goodwill, intangibles and property, plant and equipment.


Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. We test goodwill for impairment annually, and more frequently when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. In 2016, we conducted impairment testing on the goodwill in our legacy Programmable Solutions Division ("PSD") and recorded an impairment charge of $488.5 million. In addition, our other long-lived assets which include intangibles and property, plant and equipment are evaluated for impairments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Either of these situations may occur for various reasons, including changes in actual or expected income or cash flow. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 we have reorganized our reportable segments as a result of which goodwill was reallocated to new segments. We continue to evaluate current conditions to assess whether any impairment exists. Additional impairments could occur in the future if any of the following occur: market or interest rate environments deteriorate, significant adverse changes in business climate, unanticipated competition, loss of key customers, changes in technology, expected future cash flows of our reporting units decline, or reporting unit carrying values change materially compared with changes in respective fair values.

We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of, or inability to attract, such personnel would harm us.

To a greater degree than most non-technology companies, we depend on the efforts and abilities of certain key members of management and technical personnel to execute on the strategic initiatives of our business. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to retain such personnel and to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, particularly product and process engineers. We compete for these individuals with certain of our competitors, other companies, academic institutions, government entities and other organizations. Competition for such personnel, particularly in the Silicon Valley, is intense and we may not be successful in hiring or retaining new or existing qualified personnel. Furthermore, changes in immigration and work permit laws and regulations or the administration or enforcement of such laws or regulations can also impair our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Equity awards are critical to our ability to hire and retain such key personnel, and any reduction in the price of our common stock (and accordingly the value of such equity awards) may reduce the willingness of key personnel to remain employed by the Company. In addition, we may also need to significantly increase our cash-based compensation to retain such personnel.

Our business may also be impacted if we lose members of our senior management team. Any disruption in management continuity could impact our results of operations and stock price and may make recruiting for future management positions more difficult. In addition, changes in key management positions may temporarily affect our financial performance and results of operations as new management becomes familiar with our business. The loss of any of our key officers or other employees, or our inability to attract, integrate and retain qualified employees, could require us to dedicate significant financial and other resources to such personnel matters, disrupt our operations and seriously harm our operations and business.

If we are unable to obtain stockholder approval of additional shares for our share-based compensation award programs in the future, we could be at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace for qualified personnel.

Our compensation program, which includes cash and share-based compensation award components, has been instrumental in attracting, hiring, motivating, and retaining qualified personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is extremely intense, particularly for engineering and other technical personnel. Our success depends on our continued ability to attract, hire, motivate, and retain qualified personnel and our share-based compensation award programs provide us with a competitive compensatory tool for this purpose. The continued use of our share-based compensation program is necessary for us to compete for engineering and other technical personnel and professional talent. In the future, if we are unable to obtain stockholder approval of additional shares for our share-based compensation award programs, we could be at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace for qualified personnel.

There can be no assurance we will continue to declare dividends.



Our Board of Directors previously adopted a policy pursuant to which the Company would pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. The declaration and payment of any dividend or distribution is subject to the approval of our Board and our dividend may be discontinued or reduced at any time. There can be no assurance that we will declare dividends or distributions in the future in any particular amounts, or at all. Future dividends or distributions, if any, and their timing and amount, may be affected by, among other factors, management’s views on potential future capital requirements for strategic transactions, including acquisitions; earnings levels; contractual restrictions; our cash position and overall financial condition; debt related payments and commitments, including restrictive covenants which may limit our ability to pay a dividend or distribution; changes in tax or corporate laws; our ability to repatriate cash into the United States; stock repurchase programs; the need to invest in research and development or other parts of our business operations; and changes to our business model. Accordingly, our dividend or other distribution payments may change from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends or other distributions in any particular amounts or at all. A reduction in our dividend payments or a change in the tax treatment of future dividends could have a negative effect on our stock price.

We may have fluctuations in the amount and frequency of our stock repurchases and there can be no assurance that we will continue to repurchase shares of our stock.

In October 2015, our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase plan pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in an aggregate amount not to exceed $450 million. Although our Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program, the share repurchase program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific dollar amount or number of shares. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will continue to repurchase shares of our stock in any particular amounts, or at all. The stock repurchase plan could affect the price of our stock and increase volatility and may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice and in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which may result in a decrease in the trading price of our common stock. Through the end the 2016 fiscal year, we repurchased a total of 29.5 million shares for a total cost of $239.2 million under the October 2015 stock repurchase plan. A substantial majority of these purchases were made prior to the start of our second quarter of 2016. In fiscal 2017, we did not repurchase any shares in open market under the stock repurchase plan.

Any guidance that we may provide about our business or expected future results may differ significantly from actual results.

From time to time we have shared our views in press releases or SEC filings, on public conference calls and in other contexts about current business conditions and our expectations as to our future results of operations. Correctly identifying the key factors affecting business conditions and predicting future events is inherently an uncertain process, especially in uncertain economic times. Given the complexity and volatility of our business, our analysis and forecasts have in the past and will likely in the future, prove to be incorrect. We offer no assurance that such predictions or analysis will ultimately be accurate, and investors should treat any such predictions or analysis with appropriate caution. Any analysis or forecast that we make which ultimately proves to be inaccurate may adversely affect our stock price.

Industry consolidation may lead to increased competition and may harm our operating results.

There has been a trend toward industry consolidation in our markets for several years. We expect this trend to continue as companies attempt to strengthen or hold their market positions in an evolving industry and as companies are acquired or are unable to continue operations. Industry consolidation may result in stronger companies that are better able to compete with us. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.



We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights adequately.

rights.


The protection of our intellectual property rights, as well as those of our subsidiaries, is essential to keeping others from copying the innovations that are critical to our existing and future products. It may be possible for an unauthorized third party to reverse-engineer or decompile our software products. The process of seeking patent protection can be long and expensive and we cannot be certain that any currently pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents, or that, even if patents are issued, they will be respected by third parties. Furthermore, our flexible fab initiative requires us to enter into technology transfer agreements with external partners, providing third party access to our intellectual property and resulting in additional risk. In some cases, these technology transfer and/or license agreements are with foreign companies and subject our intellectual property to regulation in foreign countries which may afford less protection and/or result in increased costs to enforce such agreements or intellectual property rights. We anticipate that we will continue to enter into these kinds of licensing arrangements in the future. Consequently, we may become involved in litigation, in the United States or abroad, to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets and know-how, to determine the validity or scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of invalidity. We aremay also from time to time be involved in litigation relating to alleged infringement by us of others’ patents or other intellectual property rights.

22



Moreover, a key element of our strategy is to enter new markets with our products. If we are successful in entering these new markets, we will likely be subject to additional risks of potential infringement claims against us as our technologies are deployed in new applications and face new competitors. We may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights, particularly in certain international markets, making misappropriation of our intellectual property more likely. Patent litigation, if necessary or if and when instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

In addition, in August 2016, we entered into a series of agreements to divest a large number of older, legacy patents. The divestiture of these patents may limit our ability to make certain legal claims, and to be successful, in future patent litigation.


We also rely on trade secret protection for our technology, in part through confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties. Through these and other written agreements, we attempt to control access to and distribution of our intellectual property documentation and other proprietary technology information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, former employees, consultants or third parties may, in an unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality as our technology. Policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights is difficult, and nearly impossible on a worldwide basis. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriation of our technology or intellectual property rights, particularly in foreign countries where we do business or where our technology is sold or used, where the laws may not protect proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States or where the enforcement of such laws is not common or effective.


We may be involved in intellectual property litigation and face significant expenses as a result of ongoing or future litigation.


Other companies or entities also have commenced, and may again commence, actions seeking to establish the invalidity of our patents. While we intend to defend these actions vigorously, there is no guarantee of success, and such effort takes significant financial and time resources from the Company. In the event that one or more of our patents are challenged, a court or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may invalidate the patent(s) or determine that the patent(s) is not enforceable, which could harm our competitive position. If our patents are invalidated, or if the scope of the claims in any of these patents is limited by a court or USPTO decision, we could be prevented from pursuing certain litigation matters or licensing the invalidated or limited portion of such patents. Such adverse decisions could negatively impact our future, expected revenue.


Intellectual property litigation is frequently expensive to both the winning party and the losing party and could take up significant amounts of management’s time and attention. In addition, if we lose such a lawsuit, a court could find that our intellectual property rights are invalid, enabling our competitors to use our technology, or require us to pay substantial damages and/or royalties or prohibit us from using essential technologies. In addition, in August 2016, we entered into a series of agreements to divest a large number of older, legacy patents. The divestiture of these patents may limit our ability to make certain legal claims, and to be successful, in future patent litigation. For these and other reasons, this type ofintellectual property litigation could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results


of operations. Also, although in certain instances we may seek to obtain a license under a third party’s intellectual property rights in order to bring an end to certain claims or actions asserted against us, we may not be ableunable to obtain such a license on reasonable terms or at all. We believe we have meritorious defenses and claims in our current litigation and we intend to defend and pursue such claims vigorously. Unfortunately, such litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties.

uncertainties and may negatively impact our business.


The accumulation of changes in our shares by “5-percent stockholders” could trigger an ownership change for U.S. income tax purposes, in which case our ability to utilize our net operating losses would be limited and therefore impact our future tax benefits. Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions by activist stockholders.

We are a publicly traded company and our stockholders can change on a daily basis. These changes are beyond our control. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code (Section 382) restricts a company’s ability to benefit from net operating losses if a “Section 382 Ownership Change” occurs. An ownership change for purposes of U.S. tax law Section 382 may result from ownership changes that increase the aggregate ownership of “5-percent stockholders,” by more than 50 percentage points over a testing period, generally three years (“Section 382 Ownership Change”). We experienced a Section 382 Ownership Change upon the merge with Spansion. The resulting limitations accompanying the ownership change are reflected in our deferred tax assets with no permanent limitation in our ability to utilize our tax attributes.

The actions of activist stockholders, including any related legal proceedings, could adversely affect our business. Specifically:
responding to common actions of an activist stockholder, such as public proposals and requests for special meetings, nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors, requests that certain executive officers or directors depart the Company, requests to make changes to internal business operations, requests to pursue a strategic combination or other transaction or other special requests, could disrupt our operations, be costly and time-consuming or divert the attention of our management and employees; 
perceived uncertainties as to our future direction in relation to the actions of an activist stockholder, including any perceived changes at the board or management level, may result in the loss of potential business opportunities or the perception that we are unstable and need to make changes, which may be exploited by our competitors and make it more difficult to attract and retain key personnel as well as consumers and service providers;
actions of an activist stockholder, especially any legal proceedings, may divert management time and attention away from execution on the Company’s business operations and cause the Company to incur significant costs, including expenses related to legal, public relations, investment banking, and/or proxy advisory services - these expenses could have a material adverse impact on our financial results;
the election to our Board of Directors of director candidates who are not supported by the Company, may create unnecessary conflict and instability on our board of directors; and
actions of an activist stockholder may cause fluctuations in our stock price based on speculative market perceptions, unflattering media coverage, or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.

We face additional problems and uncertainties associated with international operations that could seriously harm us.


International revenues historically accounted for a significant portion of our total revenues. Our manufacturing, assembly, and test operations and certain finance operations located in outside of the United States, as well as our international sales offices and design centers, face risks frequently associated with foreign operations including but not limited to:

·

currency exchange fluctuations;

·

the devaluation of local currencies;

currency exchange fluctuations;

·

political instability;

the devaluation of local currencies;

·

labor issues;

political instability, and the possibility of a deteriorating relationship with the United States;

·

the impact of natural disasters on local infrastructures and economies;

labor issues, including collective bargaining agreements;

·

changes in local economic conditions;

the impact of natural disasters on local infrastructures and economies;

·

import and export controls;

changes in local economic conditions;

·

potential shortage of electric power supply;

import and export controls;

·

potential violations by our international employees or third party agents of international or U.S. laws relevant to foreign operations (such as FCPA) and

potential shortage of power supply;

·

changes in tax laws, tariffspotential violations by our international employees or third party agents of international or U.S. laws relevant to foreign operations (such as FCPA); and freight rates.



changes in tax laws, tariffs and freight rates.

To the extent any such risks materialize, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be seriously harmed.

23


We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of, or inability to attract, such personnel would harm us.

To a greater degree than most non-technology companies, we depend on the efforts and abilities of certain key members of management and technical personnel to execute on the strategic initiatives of our business. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to retain such personnel and to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, particularly product and process engineers. We compete for these individuals with certain of our competitors, other companies, academic institutions, government entities and other organizations. Competition for such personnel is intense and we may not be successful in hiring or retaining new or existing qualified personnel. Equity awards are critical to our ability to hire and retain such key personnel. In addition, we may also need to significantly increase our cash based compensation to retain such personnel.

Our financial results could be adversely impacted if our Emerging Technologies businesses fail to develop and successfully bring to market new and proprietary products.

We have made a financial and personnel commitment to our Emerging Technologies businesses. Despite the significant amount of resources we commit to our Emerging Technologies businesses, there can be no guarantee that such Emerging Technologies businesses will perform as expected or at all, launch new products and solutions as expected or gain market acceptance. If our Emerging Technologies businesses’ fail to introduce new product and solutions or successfully develop new technologies, or if our customers do not successfully introduce new systems or products incorporating the products or solutions offered by our Emerging Technologies businesses or market demand for the products or solutions offered by our Emerging Technologies businesses do not materialize as anticipated, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.

Any guidance that we may provide about our business or expected future results may differ significantly from actual results.

From time to time we have shared our views in press releases or SEC filings, on public conference calls and in other contexts about current business conditions and our expectations as to our future results of operations. Correctly identifying the key factors affecting business conditions and predicting future events is inherently an uncertain process, especially in uncertain economic times. Given the complexity and volatility of our business, our analyses and forecasts have in the past and will likely in the future, prove to be materially incorrect. We offer no assurance that such predictions or analyses will ultimately be accurate, and investors should treat any such predictions or analyses with appropriate caution. Any analysis or forecast that we make which ultimately proves to be inaccurate may adversely affect our stock price.


We are subject to many different environmental, data privacy, health and safety laws, regulations and directives, and compliance with them may be costly.


We are subject to many different international, federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations related to, among other things, the storage, use, discharge and disposal of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in our manufacturing process, conflict mineral and data privacy legislation, as well as the health and safety regulations related to our employees. Compliance with these regulations can be costly. We cannot assure youThere can be no assurance that we have been, or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws and regulations. If we violate or fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by the regulators. Under certain environmental laws, we could be held responsible, without regard to fault, for all of the costs relating to any contamination at our or our predecessors’ past or present facilities and at third party waste disposal sites. We could also be held liable for any and all consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or other environmental damage.


Proposed or new legislation and regulations could also significantly affect our business. There currently are a number of proposals pending before federal, state, and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies. In addition, the new European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will take effect in May 2018 and will apply to many of our products and services that provide service in Europe. The GDPR will include operational requirements for companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the European Union that are different than those currently in place in the European Union. For example, we may be required to implement measures to change our service or limit access to our service for minors under the age of 16 for certain countries in Europe that maintain the minimum age of 16 under the GDPR. We may also be required to obtain consent and/or offer new controls to existing and new users in Europe before processing data for certain aspects of our service. In addition, the GDPR will include significant penalties for non-compliance. Similarly, there are a number of legislative proposals in the United States, at both the federal and state level, that could impose new obligations in areas affecting our business, such as liability for copyright infringement by third parties. In addition, some countries are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services.

Over the last several years, there has been increased public awareness of the potentially negative environmental impact of semiconductor manufacturing operations. This attention and other factors may lead to changes in environmental regulations that could force us to purchase additional equipment or comply with other potentially costly requirements. If we fail to control the use of, or to adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances under present or future regulations, we could face substantial liability or suspension of our manufacturing operations, which could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We face increasing complexity in our product design as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the material composition of our products, including the restrictions on lead and other hazardous substances that apply to specified electronic products put on the market in the European Union, China and California. Other countries, including at the federal and state levels in the United States, are also considering similar laws and regulations. Certain electronic products that we maintain in inventory may be rendered obsolete if they are not in compliance with such laws and regulations, which could negatively impact our ability to generate revenue from those products. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any such new laws and regulations, they will likely result in additional costs, or in the worst case decreased revenue, and could even require that we redesign or change how we manufacture our products. Such redesigns result in additional costs and possible delayed or lost revenue.

24


Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Our worldwide operations could be adversely affected if disrupted for any reason, including natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, telecommunication or information technology system failures, regulatory or political issues, power or water shortages, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics or pandemics or other man- made disasters or catastrophic events. While we maintain business interruption insurance for our primary foreign manufacturing operations, we are self-insured for any loss or damage to our primary manufacturing facility. As such, the occurrence of any of these business disruptions for us or our third party manufacturers, partners or customers could result in significant losses, seriously harm our revenue and financial condition, adversely affect our competitive position, increase our costs and expenses, and require substantial expenditures and recovery time in order to fully resume operations. Our corporate headquarters, and a portion of our research and development activities, are located in California, and other critical business operations and some of our suppliers are located in California and Asia, near major earthquake faults known for seismic activity. The manufacture of product components, the final assembly of our products and other critical operations are concentrated in certain geographic locations, including the Philippines, Malaysia, China and India. We also rely on major logistics hubs primarily in Asia to manufacture and distribute our products. The ultimate impact on us, our significant suppliers and our general infrastructure of being located near major earthquake faults and being consolidated in certain geographical areas is unknown. However in the event of a major earthquake or other natural disaster or catastrophic event, our revenue, profitability and financial condition could suffer.

System security risks, data protection or privacy breaches, cyber-attacks and systems integration issues could disrupt our internal operations and/or harm the reputation of the Company, and any such disruption or harm could cause a reduction in our expected revenue, increase our expenses, negatively impact our results of operation or otherwise adversely affect our stock price.

Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential and proprietary information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions and delays that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions.

We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our business on the cloud. Breaches of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data about us, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our brand and reputation or otherwise harm our business. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of implementing further data protection measures could be significant.

Portions of our IT infrastructure also may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with systems integration or migration work that takes place from time to time. We may not be successful in implementing new systems and transitioning data, which could cause business disruptions and be more expensive, time consuming, disruptive and resource-intensive. Such disruptions could adversely impact our ability to fulfill orders and interrupt other processes. Delayed sales, lower margins or lost customers resulting from these disruptions have adversely affected us in the past, and in the future could adversely affect our financial results, stock price and reputation.

We maintain self-insurance for certain indemnities we have made to our officers and directors, and if a significant payment were to arise out of such liabilities, it could harm our financial condition and results of operation.

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and indemnification agreements require us to indemnify our officers and directors for certain liabilities that may arise in the course of their service to us. We self-insure with respect to these indemnifiable claims. If we were required to pay a significant amount on account of these liabilities for which we self-insure, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.

25


New regulations


Regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.


On August 22, 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted new requirements for companies that use certain minerals and metals, known as conflict minerals, in their products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. These requirements require companies to doperform diligence, disclose and report whether or not such minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. We have undertaken the necessary diligence to


determine whether such minerals are used in the manufacture of our products. However, the implementation of these new requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of such minerals if they are found to be used in the manufacture of our products. In addition, regardless of our findings, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals and metals used in our products. Since our supply chain is complex, we may not be able to sufficiently verify the origins for these minerals and metals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. In such event, we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who require that all of the components of our products are certified as conflict mineral free. The next report is due on May 31, 2016

Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Our worldwide operations could be adversely affected if disrupted for any reason, including natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, telecommunication or information technology system failures, regulatory or political issues, power or water shortages, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics or pandemics or other man- made disasters or catastrophic events. While we maintain business interruption insurance for our primary foreign manufacturing operations, we are self-insured for any loss or damage to our primary manufacturing facility. As such, the 2015 calendar year.

Changesoccurrence of any of these business disruptions for us or our third-party manufacturers, partners or customers could result in U.S. and International tax legislation regarding our foreign earnings could materially impact our business.

A majority ofsignificant losses, seriously harm our revenue is generated from customers located outside the U.S.and financial condition, adversely affect our competitive position, increase our costs and expenses, and require substantial expenditures and recovery time in order to fully resume operations. Our corporate headquarters, and a substantial portion of our assets, including employees,research and development activities, are located outside the U.S. United States income tax has not been provided on a portion of earningsin California, and other critical business operations and some of our non-U.S. subsidiariessuppliers are located in California and Asia, near major earthquake faults known for seismic activity. The manufacture of product components, the final assembly of our products and other critical operations are concentrated in certain geographic locations, including the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, China and India. We also rely on major logistics hubs primarily in Asia to manufacture and distribute our products. The ultimate impact on us, our significant suppliers and our general infrastructure of being located near major earthquake faults and being consolidated in certain geographical areas is unknown. However, in the extent that such earnings are consideredevent of a major earthquake or other natural disaster or catastrophic event, our revenue, profitability and financial condition could suffer.


Changes to be indefinitely reinvested. In the past, the administration has considered initiatives which could substantially reduceBoard of Directors and senior management may disrupt our operations, our strategic focus or our ability to defer U.S. taxes including: limitations on deferral of U.S. taxation of foreign earnings eliminate utilization or substantially reducedrive stockholder value.

Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to claim foreign tax credits, and eliminate various tax deductions until foreign earnings are repatriated to the U.S. If anyretain key members of these proposals are constituted into law, they could have a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

We are subject to examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), and from time to time we are subject to income tax audits or similar proceedings in other jurisdictions in which we do business, and as a result we may incur additional costs and expenses or owe additional taxes, interest and penalties which will negatively impact our operating results.

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions,senior management team and our determinationBoard of Directors (the “Board”) and to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel for our tax liability is subject to review by applicable domesticBoard and foreign tax authorities. The results of these US and certain foreign jurisdiction examinationssenior management positions. Turnover may result in a decrease of our current estimate of unrecognized tax benefits or increase of actual tax liabilities which could negatively impact our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Tax bills are introduced from time to time to reform U.S. taxation of international business activities. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, also recently released guidance covering various topics, including country-by-country reporting, definitional changes to permanent establishment and Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, or BEPS, an initiative that aims to standardize and modernize global tax policy. Depending on the final guidance and legislation ultimately enacted, if any, there may be significant consequences for us due to the large scale of our international business activities.

In addition, policies regarding corporate income taxes in numerous jurisdictions are under heightened scrutiny. As a result, decisions by tax authorities regarding treatments and positions of corporate income taxes could be subject to legislative investigation and inquiry, which could result in changes in tax policies or prior tax rulings. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these investigations and inquiries. As such, the taxes we previously paid may be subject to change and our taxes may increase in the future, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and our corporate reputation.

26


If the tax incentive or tax holiday arrangements we have negotiated in Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand change or cease to be in effect or applicable, in part or in whole, for any reason, or if our assumptions and interpretations regarding tax laws and incentive or holiday arrangements prove to be incorrect, the amount of corporate income taxes we have to pay could significantly increase.

We have structureddisrupt our operations, to maximize the benefit from various tax incentives and tax holidays extended to us in various jurisdictions to encourage investmentour strategic focus or employment. Each such tax incentive is separate and distinct from the others, and may be granted, withheld, extended, modified, truncated, complied with or terminated independently without any effect on the other incentives. The tax incentives are presently scheduled to expire at various dates generally beginning in 2018, subject in certain cases to potential extensions, which we may or may not be able to obtain. Absent these tax incentives, the corporate income tax rate in these jurisdictions that would otherwise apply to us would be between 20% to 30%. The tax incentives that we have negotiated are also subject to our compliance with various operating and other conditions. If we cannot, or elect not to, comply with the operating conditions included in any particular tax incentive, we will lose the related tax benefits and we could be required to refund previously realized material tax benefits. Depending on the incentive at issue, we could also be required to modify our operational structure and tax strategy, which may not be as beneficial to us as the benefits provided under the present tax concession arrangements. Our interpretations and conclusions regarding the tax incentives are not binding on any taxing authority, and if our assumptions about tax and other laws are incorrect or if these tax incentives are substantially modified or rescinded we could suffer material adverse tax and other financial consequences, which would increase our expenses, reduce our profitability and adversely affect our cash flows.

The accumulation of changes in our shares by “5-percent stockholders” could trigger an ownership change for U.S. income tax purposes, in which case our ability to utilizedrive stockholder value. If we fail to attract new skilled personnel for our net operating losses would be limitedBoard and therefore impact our future tax benefits.

Cypress is a publicly traded company whose stockholders can change on a daily basis. These changes are beyond our control. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code (Section 382) restricts a company’s ability to benefit from net operating losses if a “Section 382 Ownership Change” occurs. An ownership change for purposes of U.S. tax law Section 382 may result from ownership changes that increase the aggregate ownership of “5-percent stockholders,” by more than 50 percentage points over a testing period, generally three years (“Section 382 Ownership Change”). We experienced a Section 382 Ownership Change upon the acquisition of Spansion. The resulting limitations accompanying the ownership change are reflected in our deferred tax assets with no permanent limitation in our ability to utilize our tax attributes.

Acquisition and investments could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other harmful consequences that may adversely impactsenior management positions, our business and results of operations.

Acquisitions are an important elementgrowth prospects could be adversely impacted.


We have made certain indemnities to our officers and directors for which we have purchased insurance. If material liabilities were to arise in excess of our overall corporate strategy and use of capital. These transactions could be material toinsurance coverage, our financial condition and results of operations. We expect to continue to evaluateoperations could be materially impacted.

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and enter into discussions regarding a wide array of potential strategic transactions. The process of integrating an acquired company, business, or technology has created, and will continue to create, unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The areas where we face risks include, but are not limited to:

·

Diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to integration challenges;

·

Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization, and retention of employees from the businesses we acquire;

·

Successfully transitioning the current customer, supplier, foundry and other partnering relationships of the acquired company;

·

Implementation or remediation of controls, procedures, and policies at the acquired company;

·

Integration of the acquired company’s accounting, human resource, and other administrative systems, and coordination of product, engineering, and sales and marketing functions;

·

In the case of acquired companies with global operations, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific countries;

·

Failure to successfully further develop the acquired business or technology;

·

Liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including intellectual property infringement claims, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities, and other known and unknown liabilities; and

·

Pending litigation or other known or unknown claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims by stockholders for breach of fiduciary duties, terminated employees, customers, former stockholders, or other third parties.

Our failure to address these and other risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or current acquisitions and investments could causeindemnification agreements require us to failindemnify our officers and directors for certain liabilities that may arise in the course of their service to realize the anticipated benefitsus. If we were required to pay a significant amount on account of these liabilities, or such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and harmwere not covered by insurance coverage, our business, generally. Current and future acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition or results. As a result, the anticipated benefitand results of many of our acquisitions may not be realized.

27


We invest in companies for strategic reasons and may not realize a return on our investments.

We make investments in companies to further our strategic objectives and support our key business initiatives. Such investments include equity instruments of private companies, and many of these instruments are non-marketable at the time of our initial investment. These companies range from early-stage companies that are often still defining their strategic direction to more mature companies with established revenue streams and business models. The success of these companies is dependent on product development, market acceptance, operational efficiency, and other key business factors as well as their ability to secure additional funding, obtain favorable investment terms for future financings, or participate in liquidity events such as public offerings, mergers, and private sales. If any of these companies fail, we could lose all or part of our investment in that company. If we determine that other-than-temporary decline in the fair value exists for an equity investment in a company in which we have invested, we write down the investment to its fair value and recognize the related write-down as an investment loss.

When the strategic objectives of an investment have been achieved, or if the investment or business diverges from our strategic objectives, we may decide to dispose of the investment. We may incur losses on the disposal of our investments. Additionally, for cases in which we are required under equity method accounting to recognize a proportionate share of another company's income or loss, such income or loss may impact our earnings. Gains or losses from equity securities could vary from expectations depending on gains or losses realized on the sale or exchange of securities, gains or losses from equity method investments, and impairment charges for equity and other investments.

We may have fluctuations in the amount and frequency of our stock repurchases.

On October 20, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase plan pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in an aggregate amount not to exceed $450 million. Although our Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program, the share repurchase program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific dollar amount or number of shares.  The stock repurchase could affect the price of our stock and increase volatility and may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice and in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which may result in a decrease in the trading price of our common stock.  

There can be no assurance we will continue to declare dividends and that our cash distributions on common stock will continue to be considered a return of capital.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors adopted a policy pursuant to which the Company would pay quarterly cash distributions on our common stock. We intend to continue to pay such distributions subject to capital availability and periodic determinations by our Board of Directors that cash distributions are in the best interest of our shareholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements of Cypress applicable to the declaration and payment of cash distributions. Based upon our lack of current earnings and profits, in the United States, prior to 2016, these distributions have been treated for income tax purposes as a return of capital.

Future distributions may be affected by, among other factors:

·

our views on potential future capital requirements for investments in acquisitions and the funding of our research and development;

·

stock repurchase programs;

·

changes in federal and state income tax laws or corporate laws;

·

changes to our business model; and

·

debt payments.

Our distribution payments may change from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare distributions in any particular amounts or at all. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that the cash distributions will continue to be treated for income tax purposes as a return of capital. A reduction in our distribution payments or a change in the tax treatment of future distributions could have a negative effect on our stock price.

28


If we are unable to obtain stockholder approval of additional shares for our share-based compensation award programs in the future, weoperations could be at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace for qualified personnel.

Our compensation program, which includes cash and share-based compensation award components, has been instrumental in attracting, hiring, motivating, and retaining qualified personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is extremely intense, particularly for engineering and other technical personnel. Our success depends on our continued ability to attract, hire, motivate, and retain qualified personnel and our share-based compensation award programs provide us with a competitive compensatory tool for this purpose. The continued use of our share-based compensation program is necessary for us to compete for engineering and other technical personnel and professional talent. In the future, if we are unable to obtain stockholder approval of additional shares for our share-based compensation award programs, we could be at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace for qualified personnel.

seriously harmed.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

None.




ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

Our executive offices are located in San Jose, California. The following tables summarize our primary properties as of the end of fiscal 2015:

2017:

Location

Square Footage

Primary Use

Owned:

Location

Square FootagePrimary Use
Owned:
United States:


Bloomington, Minnesota

337,000

Manufacturing, research and development

San Jose, California

171,000

171,370


Administrative offices, research and development

Austin, Texas

1,514,000

1,294,000


Manufacturing, research and development and administrative offices

Colorado Springs, Colorado

70,400

72,000


Administrative offices, research and development

Lynnwood, Washington

67,000


Administrative offices, research and development

Asia:


Cavite, Philippines

253,000

221,000


Manufacturing, research and development

Bangkok,

Thailand

253,000

253,300


Manufacturing, research and development

Penang, Malaysia

175,000

175,900


Manufacturing, research and development and administrative offices

We

In fiscal 2017, we have an additional 760,000added 105,300 square feet of leased space for research and development, administrative, sales offices and design centers located in the United States, Asia and Europe. We believe that our current properties are suitable and adequate for our foreseeable needs. We may need to exit facilities as we continue to evaluate our business model and cost structure.  

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information with respect to this item may be found in Note 1920 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

29





PART II

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information, Holders of Common Equity, Dividends and Performance Graph

On November 12, 2009, our common stock was listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “CY.” Prior to November 12, 2009, our common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth the high and low per share prices for our common stock:

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

Fiscal 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

8.11

 

 

$

10.96

 

Third quarter

 

$

8.55

 

 

$

12.46

 

Second quarter

 

$

11.65

 

 

$

14.46

 

First quarter

 

$

13.39

 

 

$

16.25

 

Fiscal 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

14.42

 

 

$

14.68

 

Third quarter

 

$

9.96

 

 

$

10.23

 

Second quarter

 

$

10.42

 

 

$

10.66

 

First quarter

 

$

10.00

 

 

$

10.27

 

Fiscal 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

8.97

 

 

$

10.34

 

Third quarter

 

$

9.05

 

 

$

13.10

 

Second quarter

 

$

9.60

 

 

$

11.55

 

First quarter

 

$

9.84

 

 

$

11.37

 

  Low High
Fiscal 2017:  
  
Fourth quarter $14.55
 $17.42
Third quarter $12.50
 $15.11
Second quarter $12.68
 $14.58
First quarter $10.99
 $14.98
Fiscal 2016:  
  
Fourth quarter $9.63
 $12.22
Third quarter $9.79
 $12.48
Second quarter $8.02
 $11.22
First quarter $6.30
 $9.73
Fiscal 2015:  
  
Fourth quarter $8.11
 $10.96
Third quarter $8.55
 $12.46
Second quarter $11.65
 $14.46
First quarter $13.39
 $16.25
As of February 26, 2016,15, 2018, there were approximately 1,5501,300 registered holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, we paid dividends of $144.7 million, $141.4 million and $128.0 million, respectively, at a rate of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in each quarter of the fiscal year.

During fiscal 2014, we paid dividends of $69.2 million, at a rate of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in each quarter of the fiscal year.

During fiscal 2013, we paid dividends of $64.8 million, at a rate of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in each quarter of the fiscal year.

30













The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock against the cumulative total return of the Standard and Poor (“S&P”) 500 Index and the S&P Semiconductors Index for the last five fiscal years:

*$100 $100 invested on 1/2/1112/30/12 in stock or 12/31/1029/12 in index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Indexes calculated on month-end basis. Indexes calculated on month-end basis.

 

January 1,

2012

December 30,

2012

December 29,

2013

December 28,

2014

January 3,

2016

    Cypress**

91.88

59.52

60.86

89.78

62.70

    S&P 500 Index

102.11

118.45

156.82

178.29

180.75

    S&P Semiconductors Index

102.24

98.75

134.24

181.05

182.64

    Peer Group

86.90

82.79

108.54

133.55

147.18

 **

All closing prices underlying this table have been adjusted for cash dividends, stock splits and stock dividends.

31


 
December 30,
2012
December 29,
2013
December 28,
2014
January 3,
2016
January 1, 2017December 31, 2017
Cypress**100.00
97.00
132.00
90.00
106.00
141.00
S&P 500 Index100.00
130.00
144.00
143.00
157.00
187.00
S&P Semiconductors Index100.00
136.00
177.00
194.00
249.00
310.00

**    All closing prices underlying this table have been adjusted for cash dividends, stock splits and stock dividends.






























Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Equity Compensation Plan Information:

The following table summarizes certain information with respect to our common stock that may be issued under the existing equity compensation plans as of January 3, 2016:

December 31, 2017:

Plan Category

Number of Securities to be Issued

Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

(a)

 

 

 

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

(b)

 

 

 

Number of Securities Remaining

Available for Future Issuance

Under Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities Reflected in

Column (a))

(c)

 

 

 

(In millions, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

16.8

 

(1)

 

$

10.4

 

(3)

 

 

26.7

 

(6)

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

11.1

 

(2)

 

$

5.6

 

(4)

 

 

10.1

 

(7)

Total

 

27.9

 

 

 

$

7.99

 

(5)

 

 

36.8

 

 

Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to be Issued
Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(a)
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(b)
 Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities Reflected in
Column (a))
(c)
 
 (In millions, except per-share amounts) 
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders9.8
(1)$12.8
(3)46.5
(6)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders6.8
(2)$6.7
(4)2.8
(7)
Total16.6
 $11.6
(5)49.3
 

(1)

(1)Includes 8.36.1 million shares of full value awards (restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and performance stock units)

granted.

(2)

(2)Includes 2.75.9 million shares of full value awards (restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and performance stock units)

granted.

(3)

(3)Excludes the impact of 8.36.1 million shares of full value awards (restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and performance stock units), which have no exercise price.

(4)

(4)Excludes the impact of 2.75.9 million shares of full value awards (restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and performance stock units), which have no exercise price.

(5)

(5)Excludes the impact of 11.112 million shares of full value awards (restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and performance stock units), which have no exercise price.

(6)

(6)Includes 2544.3 million shares available for future issuance under Cypress’sCypress’ 2013 Stock Plan and 1.72.2 million shares available for future issuance under Cypress’sCypress’ Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(7)

(7)Includes two thousand0.2 million shares available for future issuance under the assumed Ramtron Plan and 10.12.7 million shares available for future issuance under the assumed Spansion Plan.

See Note 89 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 for further discussion of Cypress’sCypress’ stock plans.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Stock Buyback Programs:

Approval of a New $450 Million Stock Buyback Program

On October 20, 2015, our Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved a new share repurchase plan pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in an aggregate amount not to exceed $450 million. In connection with the approval of thethis new share repurchase plan, the share repurchase plan previously approved in September 2011 was terminated.  The new share repurchase plan may be funded all or in part by term loans under the Amended Credit Facility. The share repurchase program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice and in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.  

32


The table below sets forth information with respect to repurchases of our common stock made during fiscal 2013, 20142015 and 20152016 under these programs:

programs. There were no repurchases of our common stock in fiscal 2017.

 

 

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

 

 

Average Price

Paid per Share

 

 

Total Number of

Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced

Programs

 

 

Total Dollar

Value of Shares

That May Yet Be

Purchase Under the

Plans or Programs

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Authorized fund under 2011 Repurchase program:

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

400,000

 

Repurchases in fiscal 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012—March 31, 2013

 

 

411

 

 

$

10.49

 

 

 

411

 

 

$

84,059

 

April 1, 2013—June 30, 2013

 

 

10

 

 

$

10.71

 

 

 

10

 

 

$

83,952

 

July 1, 2013—September 29, 2013

 

 

9

 

 

$

11.41

 

 

 

9

 

 

$

83,856

 

September 30, 2013—December 29, 2013

 

 

23

 

 

$

9.46

 

 

 

23

 

 

$

83,675

 

Total repurchases in fiscal 2013

 

 

453

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

453

 

 

$

83,675

 

Repurchases in fiscal 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 30, 2013—March 30, 2014

 

 

18

 

 

$

10.23

 

 

 

18

 

 

$

83,490

 

March 31, 2014—June 29, 2014

 

 

7

 

 

$

9.72

 

 

 

7

 

 

$

83,425

 

June 30, 2014—September 28, 2014

 

 

3

 

 

$

10.53

 

 

 

3

 

 

$

83,398

 

September 29, 2014—December 28, 2014

 

 

5

 

 

$

10.27

 

 

 

5

 

 

$

83,341

 

Total repurchases in fiscal 2014

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

$

83,341

 

Repurchases in fiscal 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29, 2014—March 29, 2015

 

 

6

 

 

$

14.66

 

 

 

6

 

 

$

83,252

 

March 30, 2015—June 28, 2015

 

 

818

 

 

$

12.75

 

 

 

818

 

 

$

72,672

 

June 29, 2015—September 27, 2015

 

 

2

 

 

$

10.62

 

 

 

2

 

 

$

72,648

 

Total repurchases in fiscal 2015

 

 

826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

826

 

 

$

72,648

 

Total repurchases under this program

 

 

1,312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,312

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized fund under 2015 Repurchase program:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

450,000

 

September 28, 2015—January 3, 2016

 

 

5,658

 

 

$

9.99

 

 

 

5,658

 

 

$

393,475

 

Total repurchases in fiscal 2015

 

 

5,658

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,658

 

 

$

393,475

 

Total repurchases under this program

 

 

5,658

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,658

 

 

 

 

 



 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 Average Price
Paid per Share
 Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs
 Total Dollar
Value of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchase Under the
Plans or Programs
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Authorized fund under 2011 Repurchase program:
 $
 
 $400,000
Repurchases in fiscal 2015: 
  
  
  
December 29, 2014—March 29, 20156
 $14.66
 6
 $83,252
March 30, 2015—June 28, 2015818
 $12.75
 818
 $72,672
June 29, 2015—September 27, 20152
 $10.62
 2
 $72,648
Total repurchases in fiscal 2015826
  
 826
 $72,648
Total repurchases under this program859
  
 1,312
  
Authorized fund under 2015 Repurchase program: 
  
  
 $450,000
September 28, 2015—January 3, 20165,658
 $9.99
 5,658
 $393,475
Total repurchases in fiscal 20155,658
  
 5,658
 $393,475
Repurchases in fiscal 2016:       
January 4, 2016—April 3, 201623,822
 $7.66
 23,822
 $210,968
April 4, 2016—July 3, 20164
 $9.74
 4
 $210,931
July 4, 2016—October 2, 20162
 $11.46
 2
 $210,913
October 3, 2016—January 1, 20177
 $10.59
 7
 $210,844
Total repurchases in fiscal 201623,835
   23,835
 $210,844
Total repurchases under this program29,493
   29,493
  
Yield Enhancement Program (“YEP”):

In fiscal 2009, the Audit Committee approved a yield enhancement strategy intended to improve the yield on our available cash. As part of this program, the Audit Committee authorized us to enter into short-term yield enhanced structured agreements, typically with maturities of 90 days or less, correlated to our stock price. Under the agreements we have entered into to date, we pay a fixed sum of cash upon execution of an agreement in exchange for the financial institution’s obligations to pay either a pre-determined amount of cash or shares of our common stock depending on the closing market price of our common stock on the expiration date of the agreement. Upon expiration of each agreement, if the closing market price of our common stock is above the pre-determined price, we will have our cash investment returned plus a yield substantially above the yield currently available for short-term cash investments. If the closing market price is at or below the pre-determined price, we will receive the number of shares specified at the agreement’s inception. As the outcome of these arrangements is based entirely on our stock price and does not require us to deliver either shares or cash, other than the original investment, the entire transaction is recorded in equity. The shares received upon the maturing of a yield enhancement structure are included in our “shares of common stock held in treasury” inon the Consolidated Balance Sheets under Item 8.

We have entered into various yield enhanced structured agreements based upon a comparison of the yields available in the financial markets for similar maturities against the expected yield to be realized per the structured agreement and the related risks associated with thisthese type of arrangement.arrangements. We believe the risk associated with these types of agreements is no different than alternative investments available to us with equivalent counterparty credit ratings. All counterparties to a yield enhancement program have a credit rating of at least Aa2 or A as rated by major independent rating agencies. For all such agreements that matured to date, the yields of the structured agreements were far superior to the yields available in the financial markets primarily due to the volatility of our stock price and the pre-payment aspect of the agreements. The counterparty iscounterparties are willing to pay a premium over the yields available in the financial markets due to the structure of the agreement.

33


The following table summarizes the activity of our settled yield enhanced structured agreements during fiscal 2015 and 2014:

2015:

Periods

 

Aggregate

Price

Paid

 

 

Total Cash

Proceeds

Received Upon

Maturity

 

 

Yield Realized

 

 

Total Number of

Shares Received Upon

Maturity

 

 

Average Price Paid

per Share

 

Fiscal 2015:

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settled through cash proceeds

 

$

28,966

 

 

$

29,353

 

 

$

387

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Settled through issuance of common stock

 

 

9,601

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

$

9.60

 

Total for fiscal 2015

 

$

38,567

 

 

$

29,353

 

 

$

387

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

9.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settled through cash proceeds

 

$

19,415

 

 

$

19,733

 

 

$

318

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Settled through issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total for fiscal 2014

 

$

19,415

 

 

$

19,733

 

 

$

318

 

 

 

 

 

$

 



PeriodsAggregate
Price
Paid
 Total Cash
Proceeds
Received Upon
Maturity
 Yield Realized Total Number of
Shares Received Upon
Maturity
 Average Price Paid
per Share
Fiscal 2015:(in thousands)  
  
Settled through cash proceeds$28,966
 $29,353
 $387
 
 $
Settled through issuance of common stock9,601
 
 
 1,000,000
 $9.60
Total for fiscal 2015$38,567
 $29,353
 $387
 1,000,000
 $9.60
There was no activity ofin our yield enhanced structured agreements during fiscal 2013.

34


2016 and 2017.


ITEM 6.

SELECTEDSELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016 (2)

 

 

December 28,

2014 (2)

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

December 30,

2012

 

 

January 1,

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,607,853

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

$

722,693

 

 

$

769,687

 

 

$

995,204

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

1,207,850

 

 

$

361,820

 

 

$

384,121

 

 

$

376,887

 

 

$

448,602

 

Operating income (loss)

 

$

(336,905

)

 

$

22,873

 

 

$

(58,195

)

 

$

(18,915

)

 

$

153,719

 

Income (loss) attributable to Cypress (3)

 

$

(378,867

)

 

$

17,936

 

 

$

(48,242

)

 

$

(23,444

)

 

$

167,839

 

Noncontrolling interest, net of income taxes

 

$

(2,271

)

 

$

(1,418

)

 

$

(1,845

)

 

$

(1,614

)

 

$

(882

)

Net income (loss) (3)

 

$

(381,138

)

 

$

16,518

 

 

$

(50,087

)

 

$

(25,058

)

 

$

166,957

 

Adjust for net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling

   interest

 

$

2,271

 

 

$

1,418

 

 

$

1,845

 

 

$

1,614

 

 

$

882

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress

 

$

(378,867

)

 

$

17,936

 

 

$

(48,242

)

 

$

(23,444

)

 

$

167,839

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

attributable to Cypress

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

 

$

(0.16

)

 

$

1.02

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

 

$

(0.16

)

 

$

1.02

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

attributable to Cypress

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

 

$

(0.16

)

 

$

0.90

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

 

$

(0.16

)

 

$

0.90

 

Dividends per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Declared

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.27

 

Paid

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.18

 

Shares used in per-share calculation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

159,031

 

 

 

148,558

 

 

 

149,266

 

 

 

164,495

 

Diluted

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

169,122

 

 

 

148,558

 

 

 

149,266

 

 

 

186,895

 

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

December 30,

2012

 

 

January 1,

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

 

$

227,561

 

 

$

118,812

 

 

$

104,462

 

 

$

117,210

 

 

$

166,330

 

Working capital (3)

 

$

322,376

 

 

$

37,479

 

 

$

13,871

 

 

$

20,060

 

 

$

79,190

 

Total assets (3)

 

$

4,004,261

 

 

$

743,281

 

 

$

762,884

 

 

$

830,554

 

 

$

810,090

 

Debt (1)

 

$

688,265

 

 

$

243,250

 

 

$

248,230

 

 

$

264,942

 

 

$

45,767

 

Stockholders’ equity (3)

 

$

2,712,685

 

 

$

201,865

 

 

$

175,683

 

 

$

175,786

 

 

$

397,842

 

    
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 (2) (4) January 3,
2016 (2) (4)
 December 28,
2014 (2)
 December 29,
2013
 (in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:     
  
  
Revenues$2,327,771
 $1,923,108
 $1,607,853
 $725,497
 $722,693
Cost of revenues1,370,309
 1,235,540
 1,204,196
 $361,820
 $384,121
Operating income (loss)78,093
 (608,738) (323,330) $22,873
 $(58,195)
Net income (loss) (3)(80,783) (683,877) (367,563) $16,518
 $(50,087)
Adjust for net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling
   interest
$(132) $643
 $2,271
 $1,418
 $1,845
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress$(80,915) $(683,234) $(365,292) $17,936
 $(48,242)

   
  
  
  
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress per share—basic$(0.24) $(2.14) $(1.21) $0.11
 $(0.32)
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress per share—diluted$(0.24) $(2.14) $(1.21) $0.11
 $(0.32)
    
  
  
  
Dividends per share:   
  
  
  
Declared$0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
Paid$0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
Shares used in per-share calculation:   
  
  
  
Basic333,451
 319,522
 302,036
 159,031
 148,558
Diluted333,451
 319,522
 302,036
 169,122
 148,558
          


 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 (4) January 3,
2016 (4)
 December 28,
2014
 December 29,
2013
 (in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:     
  
  
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments$151,596
 $121,144
 $227,561
 $118,812
 $104,462
Working capital (3)$147,854
 $191,486
 $326,114
 $37,479
 $13,871
Total assets (3)3,537,050
 $3,871,871
 4,004,261
 $743,281
 $762,884
Debt (1)$983,816
 $1,225,131
 $688,265
 $243,250
 $248,230
Stockholders’ equity (3)$1,817,592
 $1,892,752
 2,716,423
 $201,865
 $175,683

(1)

(1)
The debt, net of costs, in fiscal year 2017 primarily included $90 million related to our Senior Secured Revolving Credit facility, $495.4 million related to our Term Loan B, $131.4 million related to our 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes, $246.6 million related to our 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, and $20.4 million related to our 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes. The debt, net of costs, in fiscal year 2016 primarily included $332.0 million related to our Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, $95.0 million related to our Term Loan A, $444.4 million of Term Loan B, $287.5 million related to our 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, and $150.0 million related to our 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes. The debt, net of costs, in fiscal year 2015 primarily included $449.0 million related to our Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, $150$97.2 million of 2% Senior Exchange notes assumed from Spansion, $97.2 millionrelated to our Term Loan A, net of costs,$150 million related to our 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes, $7.2 million ofrelated to our capital leases and $3.0 million ofrelated to our equipment loans. The debt in fiscal year 2014, net of costs, primarily included $227.0 million related to our revolving credit facility,Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, $10.3 million ofrelated to our capital leases, and $5.9 million ofrelated to our equipment loans. The debt in fiscal year 2013 primarily included $227.0 million related to our revolving credit facility,Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, $12.5 million ofrelated to our capital leases, and $8.7 million of equipment loans. The debt in fiscal year 2012 included $232.0 million related to our revolving credit facility, $15.0 million of capital leases, $11.5 million of equipment loans, $3.3 million of a mortgage note related to Ramtron, and $3.1 million of advances received for the sale of certain of our auction rate securities.loans. See Note 14 for more information on revolving credit facility, equipment loansCredit Facility and mortgage note and Note 19 for more information on capital leases.

other debt.

(2)

(2)
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company changed from recognizing revenue for sales to certain distributors at the time of shipment, as compared to when resold by the distributor to the end customer, as it determined it could reliably estimate returns and pricing concessions on certain product families and with certain distributors. This change increased fiscal 2014 revenues by $12.3 million, net income by $6.2 million and net income per share, basic and diluted, by $0.04. The change increased 2015 revenue by $40.9 million and decreased net loss by $25$25.0 million and net income per share, basic and diluted, by $0.07.$0.08. The change increased 2016 revenue by $59.2 million and decreased net loss by $19.5 million and net income per share, basic and diluted, by $0.06. As at the end of fiscal 2016, 100% of the distribution revenue had been converted to sell-in basis of revenue recognition. See additional disclosures on this change in revenue recognition in FootnoteNote 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial results of legacy Spansion beginning March 12, 2015 and the financial results of the IoT business acquired from Broadcom beginning July 5, 2016. The comparability of our results for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016 to the same prior year periods is significantly impacted by these transactions.
(4)
The Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016, and the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016 have been revised, to reflect immaterial corrections primarily related to stock-based compensation expenses. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

statements for further discussion.

35


ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS    


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain("MD&A") should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The MD&A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that involve risks and uncertainties, which are discussed under Item 1A.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

General

Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress” or “the Company”) delivers high-performance, high-quality solutions at the heart of today’s mostmanufactures and sells advanced embedded systems, fromsystem solutions for automotive, industrial, home automation and networking platforms to highly interactiveappliances, consumer electronics and mobile devices. With a broad, differentiated product portfolio that includes NOR flash memories, F-RAM™medical products. Cypress’ microcontrollers, analog ICs, wireless and SRAM, Traveo™ microcontrollers, the industry’s only PSoC® programmable system-on-chip solutions, analog and PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive touch-sensing controllers, and Wireless BLE Bluetooth Low-Energy and USBwired connectivity solutions and memory products help engineers design differentiated products and help with speed to market. Cypress is committed to providing its customers worldwide with consistent innovation, best-in-classquality support and exceptional system value.

engineering resources.




Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestitures

Merger with Spansion


On March 12, 2015, we completed the merger (“Merger”) with Spansion Inc. (“Spansion”("Spansion") pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of December 1, 2014 (the “Merger Agreement”"Merger Agreement"), for a total consideration of approximately $2.8 billion. In accordance

Acquisition of Broadcom Corporation’s Internet of Things business (“IoT business”)

On July 5, 2016, we completed the acquisition of certain assets primarily related to the IoT business of Broadcom pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement with Broadcom Corporation, dated April 28, 2016, for a total consideration of $550 million. The following MD&A includes the financial results of the IoT business beginning July 5, 2016. The comparability of our results for the year ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 to the same periods in fiscal 2015 is significantly impacted by the acquisition. To date, we have incurred approximately $9.2 million of acquisition related costs, including professional fees and other costs associated with the terms of the Merger Agreement, Spansion shareholders received 2.457 Cypress shares for each Spansion share they owned. The Merger has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Topic 805, Business Combinations, with Cypress treated as the accounting acquirer. The post-Merger company is expected to realize more than $160 million in cost synergies on an annualized basis within two years, and create a leading global provider of microcontrollers and specialized memories needed in today's embedded systems.

acquisition.


The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMD&A includes the financial results of legacy Spansion beginning March 12, 2015.2015 and the financial results of the IoT business acquired from Broadcom beginning July 5, 2016. The comparability of our operating results for the year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 to the same period in fiscal 2014prior year periods is significantly impacted by our Merger. these transactions.

In our discussion and analysis of comparative periods, we have quantified the contribution of additional revenue or expense resulting from this transactionthese transactions wherever such amounts were material and identifiable. While identified amounts may provide indications of general trends, the analysis cannot completely address the effects attributable to integration efforts.


Divestiture of TrueTouch®TrueTouch® Business

On August 1, 2015, we completed


In connection with the sale of the TrueTouch® mobileTrueTouch® Mobile touchscreen business which is a business unit within our Programmable Systems Division, to Parade Technologies (“Parade”) for total cash proceeds of $98.6 million pursuant to the definitive agreement signed on June 11, 2015. Of the total cash proceeds, $10.0 million are held in an escrow account until January 2017 subject to any indemnity claims on post-closing adjustments, per the terms of the agreement.   Post-sale, Cypress will continue to provide TrueTouch® solutions to its automotive, industrial and home appliance customers and to its mobile customers. In connection with the transaction, we sold certain assets associated with the disposed business mostly consisting of inventory with a net book value of $10.5 million and recognized a gain of $66.5 million in the third fiscal quarter of fiscal 2015. This gain has been presented as a separate line item “Gain on divestiture of TrueTouch® mobile business” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Also in connection with the transaction,August 1, 2015, we entered into a Manufacturing Service Agreement (MSA)(“MSA”) in which we agreed to sell finished wafers and devices to Parade during the one-year period following the close of the transaction.Parade. The terms of the MSA indicatedprovide that we would sell finished products to Parade at agreed-upon prices that were considered below fair market value, indicating that there was an embedded fair value that would be realized by Parade through those terms. Accordingly, we havehad allocated approximately $19.9 million from the $98.6 million proceeds to the fair value of the MSA based on the forecasted wafer sales to Parade for the subsequent one-year period.  Suchperiods. That amount was deferred on our consolidated balance sheet initially and is beingwas amortized to revenue as we sellsold products to Parade. Such amount has been fully amortized in fiscal 2017. During the year ended January 3,1, 2017 and January 2, 2016, we recognized approximately $14.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively, of revenue from the amortization of suchthe deferred revenue.

36


As


Investment in Deca Technologies Inc.

On July 29, 2016, Deca Technologies Inc. ("Deca"), our majority owned subsidiary entered into a share purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), whereby certain third-party investors purchased 41.1% of the endshares outstanding at the said date for an aggregate consideration of fiscal 2015,approximately $111.4 million. Concurrently, Deca repurchased certain of its preferred shares from us.

After giving effect to the above transactions, our organization included the following business segments:

Business Segments

Description

PSD: Programmable Systems Division

PSD focuses on high-performance, programmable solutions. The programmable portfolio includes high-performance Traveo™automotive microcontrollers, PSoC® programmable system-on-chip products, ARM® Cortex®-M4, -M3, -M0+ microcontrollers and R4 CPUs, analog PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive-sensing controllers, TrueTouch® touchscreen and fingerprint reader products, and PSoC Bluetooth Low Energy solutions for the IoT. PSD added Spansion’s microcontroller and analog products starting March 12, 2015.

MPD: Memory Products Division

MPD focuses on high-performance parallel and serial NOR flash memories, NAND flash memories, static random access memory (SRAM), and high-reliability F-RAM™ferroelectric memory devices. Its purpose is to enhance our position in these products and invent new products and derivatives. MPD added Spansion’s Flash memory products starting March 12, 2015.

DCD: Data Communications Division

DCD focuses on USB controllers, Bluetooth® Low Energy solutions that leverage Cypress’s PRoC™ programmable radio-on-chip technology, WirelessUSB™ solutions, module solutions such as trackpads and Bluetooth Low Energy modules, and controllers for the new USB Type-C standard, which enables data transmission and power delivery over a single cable with a slimmer plug. DCD focuses primarily on industrial, handset and consumer electronics markets and applications.

ETD: Emerging Technologies Division

Also known as our “startup” division, ETD includes subsidiaries AgigA Tech Inc. and Deca Technologies Inc., as well as our foundry business and other development-stage activities.

Our primary focus is profitable growthownership in our key markets. With the additionDeca reduced to 52.2% as at July 29, 2016. As a consequence of the legacy Spansion business,substantive rights afforded to third-party new investors in the purchase agreement, including, among other things, participation on the Board of directors of Deca, approval of operating plans and approval of indebtedness, we plandetermined that we no longer have the power to capitalize on our expanded product portfoliodirect the activities of Deca that most significantly impacts Deca's economic performance. However, as we continue to have significant influence over Deca's financial and leadership positionsoperating policies, effective July 29, 2016, the investment in embedded processingDeca is being accounted for as an equity method investment and specialized memories to significantly extend our penetrationfinancial results of global markets such as automotive, industrial, communications, consumer, computation, data communications, mobile handsets and military. Our revenue model isDeca are no longer being consolidated. The carrying value of this equity method investment was determined based on the fair value of the equity in Deca, which the Company calculated to be $142.5 million. This represents our remaining investment in Deca immediately following product and market strategies: (a) increasing market share in our memory productsthe investments by leveraging our market position and expanding our portfolio with new and complementary products, (b) growing revenue from our high-performance, programmable solutions and derivatives including PSoC programmable system-on-chip products and microcontrollersthird-party investors. As a result of the change in the automotivemethod of accounting for our investment in Deca from consolidation to the equity method of accounting, the net carrying value of the assets and industrial markets, (c) increasing our DCD revenue throughliabilities related to Deca, and the introductionadjustments related to the recognition of new products suchthe initial fair value of the equity method



investment resulted in a gain of $112.8 million which has been reflected as USB Type-C solutions, SuperSpeed USB 3.0 peripheral controllers and Bluetooth® Low Energy solutions that leverage Cypress’s PRoC™ programmable radio-on-chip technology for the IoT and other applications, and (d) revenue growth from ETD, which includes our internal startup companies. For profitability, our focus is"Gain related to integrate the acquired Spansion business successfully and realize the anticipated product cost and operational cost synergies. Our integration effort includes the re-focusing of portions of legacy Spansion business to higher-margin opportunities, particularlyinvestment in Deca Technologies Inc." in the Flash memory business. Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Sale of CMI

In fiscal 2017, we completed the sale of our wafer fabrication facility in Minnesota for gross proceeds from the sale of $30.5 million.

Business Developments

Business Segments

We monitorcontinuously evaluate our operating expenses closelyreportable business segments in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. Pursuant to improve our operating leveragereorganization and internal reporting structure effective fourth quarter, the Company operates under two reportable business segments: MPD and MCD. Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company reported under four reportable business segments: MPD, Programmable Systems Division ("PSD"), Data Communications Division ("DCD") and Emerging Technologies Division ("ETD").

The prior reportable segments of PSD and DCD have been combined and are referred to as driven by various company-wide initiatives, including our World Class Cost program to continuously reduce cost line itemsMCD. Deca, previously included in ETD, and now accounted for as an equity method investment, has been reflected in MCD for historical results. The MPD segment comprises a substantial portion of the previous MPD segment, as well as certain portions of the previous PSD. AgigA Tech Inc., a Human Resources effort to reduce redundancy and improve efficiency across the company.

In order to achieve our goals on revenue growth and profitability, Cypress will continue to pursue the following strategies:

·

Successfully integrate our business with Spansion. We are committed to integrating the business of Cypress and Spansion successfully to realize the anticipated cost synergies and improve the bottom line.

subsidiary previously included in ETD has been combined with MPD.

·

Cross-sell products from Cypress’s expanded product portfolio in the wake of the Spansion Merger. We will continue to take advantage of product and business synergies and grow our top-line revenue.


·

Focus on large and growing markets. We will continue to pursue business opportunities in large and growing markets, particularly the automotive and industrial markets.

The prior periods herein reflect this change in segment information.

·

Drive profitability. Cypress has implemented and maintained a tight, corporate wide focus on gross margin and operating expenses. We are committed to maintaining our current strong operating expense management without compromising our new product development and investments in our Emerging Technologies Division.

·

Drive programmable technologies, extend our leadership in programmable products and drive PSoC and microcontroller proliferation. We will continue to define, design and develop new programmable products and solutions that offer our customers increased flexibility and efficiency, higher performance, and higher levels of integration with a focus on analog functionality. We will continue to drive PSoC and microcontroller adoption in our key market segments.

37


·

Collaborate with customers to build system-level solutions. We work closely with our customers from initial product design through manufacturing and delivery to optimize their design efforts, help them achieve product differentiation, improve their time-to-market and help them to develop whole product solutions.

·

Leverage flexible manufacturing. Our manufacturing strategy combines capacity from leading foundries with output from our internal manufacturing facilities. This enables us to meet rapid swings in customer demand while reducing the burden of high fixed costs.

·

Identify and exit legacy or non-strategic, underperforming businesses. We will continue to monitor and, if necessary, to exit certain business units that are inconsistent with our future initiatives and long-term financial plans so that we can focus our resources and efforts on our core programmable and proprietary business model. The sale of our TrueTouch® mobile touchscreen business to Parade Technologies, Ltd. during the third quarter of 2015 is an example of this business strategy.

·

Pursue complementary strategic relationships. We will continue to assess opportunities to develop strategic relationships through acquisitions, investments, licensing and joint development projects. We also will continue to make significant investments in current ventures as well as new ventures.

As we continue to implement our strategies, there are many internal and external factors that could impact our ability to meet any or all of our objectives. Some of these factors are discussed under Item 1A.

Manufacturing Strategy

Our core manufacturing strategy—”flexible manufacturing”—combines capacity from foundries with output from our internal manufacturing facilities. This strategy is intended to allow us to meet rapid swings in customer demand while lessening the burden of high fixed costs, a capability that is particularly important in high-volume consumer markets that we serve with our leading programmable product portfolio.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues

Our total revenues increased by $882.4$404.7 million, or 121.6%21.04%, to $1,607.9$2,327.8 million for the year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year. For the year ended January 3, 2016, $962.3 million ofDecember 31, 2017, the increase was primarily attributable to revenue contributionsincrease in sales of products in our microcontroller, automotive, IoT Wireless Connectivity and Wired families included in MCD.
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 benefited from the acquired Spansion business which is included in the PSD and MPD divisions. The overall increase was partially offset by decrease in revenue from TrueTouch® mobile business as a result of divestitureacquisition of the IoT business on August 1, 2015. The overall average selling price of our products, including Spansion products,Broadcom, as compared to the prior year which included such sales only for a partial period post acquisition.
Revenue for the year ended January 3, 2016 was $1.09. Excluding1, 2017 benefited from the Spansion products, our ASP for the year ended January 3, 2016 was $1.14, which increased by $0.05Merger, as compared with the same period into the prior year.

year which included such sales only for a partial period post merger, offset by the divestiture of the True Touch® business.

The Company operates on a 52 or 53 week53-week year ending on the Sunday nearest to December 31. Fiscal 20142017 and 20132016 were each 52 weeks and fiscal 2015 was a 53-week year, with the extra week in the fourth fiscal quarter. The additional week in fiscal 2015 did not materially affect the Company's results of operations or financial position.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, moderate pricing pressure in certain product lines, primarily due to competitive conditions. We have in the past been able to, and expect in the future to be able to, moderate average selling price declines in our product lines by introducing new products with more features and higher prices.  We may be unable to maintain average selling prices for our products as a result of increased pricing pressure in the future, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Consistent with our accounting policies and generally accepted accounting principles, prior to fiscal 2014 we have historically recognized a significant portion of revenue through distributors at the time the distributor resold the product to its end customer (also referred to as the sell-through basis of revenue recognition) given the difficulty, at the time in estimating the ultimate price of these product shipments and amount of potential returns. We continually reassess our ability to reliably estimate the ultimate price of these products and, over the past several years, we have made investments in our systems and processes around our distribution channel to improve the quality of the information we receive from our distributors. Given these ongoing investments, and based on the financial framework we use for estimating potential price adjustments, beginning inIn the fourth quarter of 2014, we concluded that we have become able to reasonably estimate returns and pricing concessionsthe Company began recognizing revenue on certain product families and with certain distributors and recognized revenue at the time we shipped these specific products to the identified distributors, less our(less its estimate of future price adjustments and returns. returns) upon shipment to the distributors (also referred to as the sell-in basis of revenue recognition).
During the year ended January 1, 2017, we recognized an incremental $59.2 million of revenue on new product families or distributors for which we recognized revenue on a sell-in basis. This change resulted in a decrease to the net loss of $19.5 million for the year ended January 1, 2017 or $0.06 per basic and diluted share. By the end of fiscal 2016, all our revenue from transactions with distributors was recognized on a sell-in basis of revenue recognition.


During the year ended January 3, 2016, we recognized an incremental $40.9 million of revenue on additional product families for which revenue was previously recognized on a sell-through basis as we determined that we could reasonably estimate returns and pricing concessions at the time of shipment to distributors. basis. This change resulted in a decrease to the net loss of $25.0 million for the year ended January 3, 2016 or $0.07$0.08 per basic and diluted share.

38


The following table summarizes our consolidated revenues by segments:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Programmable Systems Division

 

$

613,884

 

 

$

283,206

 

 

$

292,707

 

Memory Products Division

 

 

871,640

 

 

 

347,887

 

 

 

338,986

 

Data Communications Division

 

 

72,791

 

 

 

70,378

 

 

 

79,410

 

Emerging Technologies and Other

 

 

49,538

 

 

 

24,026

 

 

 

11,590

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,607,853

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

$

722,693

 

Programmable Systems

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands) 
MCD$1,409,265
 $994,482
 $731,279
MPD918,506
 928,626
 876,574
Total revenues$2,327,771
 $1,923,108
 $1,607,853

Microcontroller and Connectivity Division:

Revenues from the Programmable Systems Divisionrecorded by MCD increased in fiscal 2015 increased2017 by $330.7$414.8 million, or 116.8%41.7%, compared to fiscal 2014.2016. We acquired the IoT business acquired from Broadcom on July 5, 2016. Consequently, fiscal 2016 revenue included only a partial period for the results from the IoT business. Additionally MCD revenues increased in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016, due to increased revenue from our wired and wireless connectivity and PSoC products.

Revenues from MCD in fiscal 2016 increased by $263.2 million or 36.0%, compared to fiscal 2015. The increase in fiscal 20152016 was primarily driven by the acquisition of the IoT business from Broadcom. Additionally, MCD revenue benefited from increased revenue from the microcontrollers product family.

The overall average selling price of our products for MCD for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.99 which decreased from the prior-year. The decrease is primarily attributed to lower ASPs for wired and wireless IoT products. The overall average selling price of our products for MCD for the year ended January 1, 2017 was $1.02 which remained unchanged as compared to fiscal 2015.
Memory Products Division:
Revenues recorded by MPD decreased in fiscal 2017 by $10.1 million, or 1.1% compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the $402.3 million of revenue contribution from the Spansion microcontroller and analog business for fiscal 2015. Excluding the impact of Spansion revenues, PSD decreased by $71.6 million for fiscal 2015, or 25.3%, compared to the prior year primarily due to weakness in our end customers’ handset/mobile business demand, decreasedeclines in revenue from TrueTouch® mobile business as a result of divestiture of the business on August 1, 2015 and incrementalNAND products offset by strength in revenue from NOR products.

Revenues from MPD increased in fiscal 2014 as a result of the change in accounting for certain distributor revenues. The decrease was partially offset2016 by an increase in sales of PSD products to the automotive applications, where we experienced a ramp in volume from recent design wins.  

Revenues from the Programmable Systems Division in fiscal 2014 decreased by $9.5$52.1 million, or 3.2%5.9% compared to fiscal 2013. The revenue decrease in fiscal 2014 was primarily attributable to declines in sales of our TrueTouch® touchscreen products due to a decrease in revenue from our handset customers and lower average selling prices. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in sales of PSD products to industrial and automotive customers where we experienced a ramp in volume from new design wins. Fiscal 2014 revenue also included $8.2 million of incremental revenue as a result of the change in accounting for certain distributor revenues as discussed above.

Memory Products Division:

Revenues from the Memory Products Division increased in fiscal 2015 by $523.8 million or 150.6% compared to fiscal 2014.2015. The increase was primarily due to $560.0 million of revenue contribution from the Spansion flashFlash memory business for fiscal 2015. Excluding the impact of Spansion revenues, MPD decreased by $36.2 million or 10.4% in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior yearproducts which grew primarily driven by sales decrease in the communication market segment.

Revenues from the Memory Products Division in fiscal 2014 increased by $8.9 million or 2.6% as compared to fiscal 2013, primarily due to an increase in sales of nonvolatile products associated with our acquisition of Ramtron in fiscal 2012,automotive and consumer segments. This was partially offset by a decrease in revenue from SRAM products.


The overall average selling prices (ASPs) of our products drivenfor MPD for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1.39, which increased by a continuing$0.14, compared with the prior year. The increase is primarily attributed to the higher ASPs of certain products in the Flash memory products.

The overall ASPs of our products for MPD for the year ended January 1, 2017 was $1.25, which decreased by $0.10, compared to $1.35 in prior year. The decrease is primarily attributed to lower ASPs in demandthe overall memory segment, particularly in NAND and SRAM products.

Cost of Revenues
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
Cost of revenues$1,370,309
 $1,235,540
 $1,204,196
As a percentage of revenue58.9% 64.2% 74.9%


Our cost of revenue ratio improved from wireless and wireline end customers. Fiscal 2014 revenue also included $4.1 million of incremental revenue as a result64.2% in fiscal 2016 to 58.9% in fiscal 2017. One of the changeprimary drivers of the improvement in accounting for certain distributor revenuesthe cost of revenue ratio was lower Spansion acquisition-related expenses which declined $21.8 million as discussed above.

Data Communications Division:

Revenue for the Data Communication Division in fiscal 2015 increased by $2.4 million or 3.4% compared to fiscal 2014 due to increasing revenue in our super speed USB products, offset by a decline in our trackpad products..

Revenue for the Data Communication Division in fiscal 2014 decreased by $9.0 million or 11.4% compared to fiscal 2013 due to declining revenue in our legacy high-speed USB controllers, optical navigation and trackpad products.

Emerging Technologies and Other:

Revenues from the Emerging Technologies Division increased by $25.5 million or 106.2% in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year. Another major contributor in the improvement in the cost of revenue ratio was higher fab utilization which increased from 56% for the year primarilyended January 1, 2017 to 74% for the year ended December 31, 2017 and a reduction in the cost of certain products. Additionally, our cost of revenue ratio improved due to the overall increase in demand at allsale of our Emerging Technologies companies. The increase was also attributable to increase in our Foundry revenues as we began selling products to Parade Technologies in August 2015 under the Manufacturing Services Agreement, which was signed in connection with our disposition of TrueTouch® mobile business.

39


Revenue from the Emerging Technologies Divisionacquired IoT business, which have a lower cost of revenue ratio than the company average. This was partially offset by higher write downs of carrying value of inventory during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year. Write-down of inventories during fiscal 2017 was $34.5 million as compared to $25.3 million in fiscal 2014 increased by $12.4 million or 107.3% compared to fiscal 2013 due to increased revenue in all three business - Deca Tech, Agiga Tech and our foundry business. The increase is due to the overall increase in demand as certain of our Emerging Technologies companies begin to ramp production with new customer design wins.

Cost of Revenues/Gross Margin

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

1,207,850

 

 

$

361,820

 

 

$

384,121

 

Gross margin percentage

 

 

24.9

%

 

 

50.1

%

 

 

46.8

%

Gross margin consists of Revenues less Cost of revenues, and gross margin percentage is percentage of gross margin to revenue. Our gross margin can vary in any period depending on factors such as the mix of types of products sold and the impact of changes to inventory provisions, such as the write-down of inventory. Our gross margin is significantly impacted by the mix of products we sell, which is often difficult to estimate with accuracy. Therefore, if we achieve significant revenue growth in our lower margin product lines, or if we are unable to earn as much revenue as we expect from higher margin product lines, our gross margin may be negatively impacted.

Gross margin percentage declined to 24.9% in fiscal 2015 from 50.1% in fiscal 2014. The decrease in gross margin for fiscal 2015 was primarily due to impact of the merger with Spansion, which historically had lower gross margins than Cypress, and $133.0 million of additional inventory reserves which were recorded on inventory assumed as a part of the Merger. The additional reserves on inventory were recognized as part of our strategy to focus on high margin, profitable business as a combined company. Total charges to cost of sales for inventory provisions, including reserves on inventory assumed as part of the Merger, totaled $152.5 million for fiscal 2015 and $19.8 million for fiscal 2014, unfavorably impacting our gross margin by 9.5% and 3.0%, respectively. Sales2016. Sale of inventory that was previously written-off or written-down totaledaggregated to $31.6 million for fiscal 2017 as compared to $65.7 million in fiscal 2016.

Our cost of revenues ratio improved from 74.9% in fiscal 2015 to 64.2% in fiscal 2016. The primary driver of the improvement in the cost of revenue ratio was lower write downs of carrying value of inventory during fiscal 2016 as compared to the prior year and our on-going focus on gross margin expansion through cost reductions, price increases and synergies recognized from the merger. Included in the cost of revenues for fiscal 2015 was a $133.0 million write-down of carrying value of inventory assumed as a part of the Spansion Merger as well as a write down of $19.5 million of certain other inventories. In comparison, write-down of inventories during fiscal 2016 was $25.3 million. Sale of inventory that was previously written-off or written-down aggregated to $65.7 million for fiscal 2016 and $6.4 million for fiscal 2015, and $3.7 millionwhich favorably impacted our cost of revenues ratio in fiscal 2016. This impact was partially offset by lower fab utilization which was 56% for fiscal 2014, favorably impacting our gross margin by 0.4% and 1.0%, respectively. Our gross margin for fiscal 2015 was also impacted by $84.4 million of amortization of fair value adjustments, net of reserves, relating2016 as compared to acquired legacy Spansion inventory.

Gross margin percentage increased to 50.1%62% in fiscal 2014 from 46.8% in fiscal 2013 primarily driven by lower cost of revenue expenses associated with the inventory acquired in the Ramtron acquisition, higher factory absorption and product and customer mix. Charges to cost of revenue for inventory reserve provisions were $19.8 million during fiscal 2014 and $12.8 million for fiscal 2013, unfavorably impacting our gross margin by 3% and 2%, respectively. The benefit realized from sales of inventory previously reserved were $3.7 million and $5.1 million for fiscal year 2014 and fiscal 2013, favorably impacting our gross margin by 1% and 1%, respectively.

2015.

Research and Development (“R&D”)  

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

R&D expenses

 

$

281,391

 

 

$

164,560

 

 

$

190,906

 

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

17.5

%

 

 

22.7

%

 

 

26.4

%

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
R&D expenses$357,016
 $331,175
 $274,813
As a percentage of revenues15.3% 17.2% 17.1%
R&D expenditures increased by $116.8$25.8 million in fiscal 20152017 compared to fiscal 2014.the same prior-year period. The increase was mainly attributable to $108.3$40.3 million of additional expenses due to the Merger,IoT business acquisition, primarily comprised of $63.0$28.2 million of increase in labor costs due to increased headcount and an increase of $12.1 million in expensed assets. The above increases were partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense and a $13.1 million decrease in other R&D expenses, mainly due to lower labor cost due to Cypress 3.0 restructuring and project spending.

R&D expenditures increased by $56.4 million in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. The increase was mainly attributable to $36.8 million of expenses due to the IoT acquisition, primarily comprised of $22.6 million of increase in labor costs due to additional headcount $24.0and increase of $14.2 million in expensed assets. The remaining increase of $19.6 million in other R&D expense was primarily due to $16.3 million of building, repairs and other overhead expenses, $7.7 million of material costs on R&D projects, $8.5 million of professional services related to Information technology and other outside services and $9.5 million of increase in stock-based compensationstock-compensation expense.

R&D expenditures decreased by $26.3 million in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $9.9 million in stock-based compensation and a decrease of $1.0 million in deferred compensation expense. There was an additional decrease in consulting fees and other outside services of $2.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively, as a result of a worldwide cost cutting effort. As a percentage of revenues, R&D expenses were lower in fiscal 2014 driven by the decrease in total expense in the same period.

40


Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

SG&A expenses

 

$

323,570

 

 

$

170,741

 

 

$

182,671

 

 

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

20.1

%

 

 

23.5

%

 

 

25.3

%

 

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
SG&A expenses$303,651
 $317,362
 $320,227
As a percentage of revenues13.0% 16.5% 19.9%

SG&A expenses increaseddecreased by $152.8$13.7 million in fiscal 20152017 compared to fiscal 2014.2016. The increasedecrease was mainly due to $99.6lower acquisition cost of $15.4 million of expenses from the Merger, primarily comprised of $50.0 million of labor costs due to additional headcount, $39.0 million of building, supplies, repairs and other overhead expenses, and $15.0 million of professional services expense related to information technology, legal and finance. Additionally, we also incurred $17.4 million of costs for professional fees for legal and audit services related to the Merger integration activities, $5.0MIoT acquisition, a $5.0 million decrease due to executive severance costs incurred in fiscal 2016, and $10.0 million decrease in non-recurring costs, offset by higher labor costs of termination costs on legacy Spansion patent license agreement$8.2 million, an increase of $5.4 million related to IoT operating expenses, and $30.6an increase of $3.1 million of increase in stock-based compensation expense primarily related to the 2015 PARS grants.

expenses.




SG&A expenses decreased by $11.9$2.9 million in fiscal 2014 or 6.5%2016 compared to fiscal 2013.2015. The decrease was mainly due to lower acquisition expenses of $14.1 million primarily attributablerelated to merger of Spansion, a $5.7 million decrease in stock-based compensation of $13.4 million, a $7.9 million decrease in headcount related expenditures, a $2.0 million decrease in deferred compensation expense, a $1.6 million decrease in variable bonus-related expense,expenses, offset by $7.3 million of acquisition related expenditurescosts associated with our proposed merger with Spansion, an increasethe IoT acquisition of $2.7$8.9 million, in legal fees and $1.3IoT operating expenses of $9.8 million in accrued estimated legal settlements.

primarily related to labor.

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets

During fiscal 2015,2017, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets increased by $101.7$20.6 million compared to fiscal 2014.2016. The increase is primarilywas mainly due to the amortization onof the intangibles acquired in connection with the Merger.

IoT business acquisition as well as the amortization related to certain in-process research and development projects, which had reached technological feasibility and were transferred to developed technology, capitalized during 2017.

During fiscal 2014,2016, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets decreasedincreased by $1.1$66.4 million compared to fiscal 2013.2015. The decrease is primarilyincrease was mainly due to the amortization of the intangibles acquired in connection with the IoT business acquisition, Spansion Merger as well as certain in-process research and development projects capitalized during 2016.
Costs and settlement charges related to certainshareholder matter

During fiscal 2017, the Company incurred $14.3 million of shareholder litigation and proxy related expenses which includes $3.5 million in reimbursement charges incurred in connection with the cooperation and settlement agreement entered into with T.J. Rodgers.
Impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets acquired
During fiscal 2016, we recognized $33.9 million of impairment charges related to two IPR&D projects that were canceled due to certain changes in our long-term product portfolio strategy during fiscal 2012 that2016.
There were fully amortizedno impairment charges of acquisition-related intangibles during fiscal 2013.

2017 and fiscal 2015.

Gain related to investment in Deca Technologies Inc.
On July 29, 2016, Deca Technologies Inc. ("Deca"), our majority owned subsidiary entered into a share purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), whereby certain third-party investors purchased 41.1% of the shares outstanding at the said date for an aggregate consideration of $111.4 million. Concurrently, Deca repurchased certain of its preferred shares previously held by Cypress.
After giving effect to the above transactions, our ownership in Deca reduced to 52.2% as at July 29, 2016. As a consequence of the substantive rights afforded to third-party new investors in the purchase agreement, including, among other things, participation on the Board of directors of Deca, approval of operating plans, approval of indebtedness etc., we determined that we no longer have the power to direct the activities of Deca that most significantly impacts Deca's economic performance. However, as we continue to have significant influence over Deca's financial and operating policies, effective July 29, 2016, the investment in Deca is being accounted for as an equity method investment and Deca is no longer a consolidated subsidiary. The carrying value of this equity method investment was determined based on the fair value of the equity in Deca, which the Company calculated to be $142.5 million. This represents our remaining investment in Deca immediately following the investments by third-party investors. As a result of the change in the method of accounting for our investment in Deca from consolidation to the equity method of accounting, the net carrying value of the assets and liabilities related to Deca, and the adjustments related to the recognition of the initial fair value of the equity method investment resulted in a gain of $112.8 million which has been reflected as "Gain related to investment in Deca Technologies Inc." in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Impairment related to assets held for sale
During fiscal 2016, we committed to a plan to sell our wafer manufacturing facility located in Bloomington, Minnesota, as well as a building in Austin, Texas. The sale of these assets was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


We recorded an impairment charge of $37.2 million during fiscal 2016, to reflect the estimated fair value, net of cost to sell these assets. During fiscal 2017, we recorded a $1.2 million adjustment as a result of changes in certain estimates related to these assets, resulting in a reduction of operating expense.

Goodwill impairment charge
During fiscal 2016, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $488.5 million related to our former PSD reporting unit. The goodwill impairment charge resulted from a combination of factors including, (a) decreases in our forecasted operating results when compared with the expectations of the PSD reporting unit at the time of the Spansion Merger, primarily in consumer markets as the Company has subsequently increased its focus on the automotive and industrial end markets, (b) evaluation of business priorities due to recent changes in management at that time, and (c) certain market conditions which necessitated a quantitative impairment analysis for the carrying value of the goodwill related to PSD.
There were no goodwill impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2015.
Restructuring


2017 Restructuring Plan

In December 2017, the Company began implementation of a reduction in workforce ("2017 Plan") which will result in elimination of approximately 80 positions worldwide across various functions. The restructuring charge of $6.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 consists of personnel costs. The Company expects to incur costs and cash payments under this plan to be completed by the end of fiscal 2018. We will reinvest a substantial portion of the savings generated from the 2017 Restructuring Plan into certain business initiatives and opportunities. Consequently, we do not expect the 2017 Restructuring Plan to result in a material reduction in our operating expenses.

2016 Restructuring Plan

In September 2016, the Company began implementation of a reduction in workforce ("2016 Plan") resulting in the elimination of approximately 430 positions worldwide across various functions. The restructuring charge of $2.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 consists of personnel costs of $1.0 million and other charges related to the write-off of certain licenses and facilities related expenses of $1.6 million The personnel costs related to the 2016 Plan during the year ended January 1, 2017 were $26.3 million. The Company expects that the costs incurred under the 2016 Plan will be paid out in cash through first quarter of fiscal 2018.

We have reinvested a substantial portion of the savings generated from the 2016 Restructuring Plan into certain business initiatives and opportunities. Consequently, the 2016 Restructuring Plan did not result in a material reduction in our operating expenses.

Spansion Integration-Related Restructuring Plan

In March 2015, we began the implementation of planned cost reduction and restructuring activities in connection with the Merger. As part of this Spansion integration-related restructuring plan, we expect to eliminate approximately 1,000 positions from the combined workforce across all business and functional areas on a global basis. TheDuring fiscal 2015, restructuring charge of $90.1 million recorded for the year ended January 3, 2016 primarily consists of severance costs, lease termination costs and impairment of property, plant and equipment. The lease termination costs include approximately $18$18.0 million relating to the buildings Spansion had leased prior to the Merger, which we decided not to occupy in the post-Merger period. The initial term of the lease commenced on January 1, 2015 and will expire on December 31, 2026.

The following table summarizes the restructuring charges recorded in our Consolidated Statements During fiscal 2016, a release of Operations for the periods presented pursuant to the Spansion Integration-Related Restructuring Plan:

previously estimated personnel related liability of $0.1 million was recorded.

 

Year Ended

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Personnel costs

$

58,972

 

Lease termination costs and other related charges

 

18,016

 

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

 

12,531

 

Other

 

565

 

Total restructuring and other charges (benefit)

$

90,084

 


We anticipate that the remaining restructuring accrualliability balance will be paid out in cash through 2016 for employee terminations and over the remaining lease term through 2026 for the excess lease obligation.

41


In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we have realized approximately $137.7 million of synergy savings on an annualized basis from the restructuring actions taken. Upon completion of all of our actions, we anticipate our annualized synergy savings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 to be approximately $160 million. When complete, we estimate approximately 40% of the savings will impact cost of goods sold and the remaining 60% will impact operating expenses. There can be no assurance that we will achieve these anticipated savings.


Gain on Divestiture of TruTouch®TrueTouch® Mobile Business

In connection with the sale of the TrueTouch® mobile touchscreen business to Parade for total cash proceeds of $98.6 million, we sold certain assets associated with the disposed business mostly consisting of inventory with a net book value of $10.5 million and recognized a gain of $66.5 million in fiscal 2015, net of the amount of gain deferred


in connection with an ongoing manufacturing service agreement we entered into with Parade in connection with the divestiture.      

Interest expense

Interest expense for fiscal 2017 was $80.2 million and primarily represents interest payments due and amortization of debt discount and costs related to 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes, 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes, interest expense incurred on our Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan B and other debt. In addition, of the $80.2 million, $7.2 million was related to the debt extinguishment for 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes and Term Loan A.
Interest expense for fiscal 2016 was $55.2 million and represents interest payments due and amortization of debt discount and costs related to 4.50% Senior Exchangeable Notes, 2% Senior Exchangeable Notes, interest expense incurred on our revolving line of credit, Term Loan A, Term Loan B and other debt.
Interest expense for fiscal 2015 was $16.416.4 million and represents accretioninterest payments due and amortization of interest expense on 2.00%debt discount and costs related to 2% Senior Exchangeable Notes, interest expense incurred on our revolving line of credit, Term Loan A and other debt.

Interest expense for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 was $5.8 million and $8.1 million, respectively, and represents interest expense incurred on our revolving line of credit and other term debt.

Refer to Note 14 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 for more information about our credit facilities.

facilities and other debt.

Other Income (expense), Net

The following table summarizes the components of other income (expense), net:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

$

885

 

 

$

362

 

 

$

301

 

Changes in fair value of investments under the deferred

   compensation plan

 

 

(1,354

)

 

 

3,014

 

 

 

6,371

 

Impairment of investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net

 

 

744

 

 

 

1,382

 

 

 

2,791

 

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

 

 

(4,655

)

 

 

(1,495

)

 

 

 

Gain on sale of equity investments

 

 

276

 

 

 

 

 

 

908

 

Others

 

 

335

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

(59

)

Other income (expense), net

 

$

(3,769

)

 

$

3,303

 

 

$

10,337

 

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
Interest income$568
 $1,836
 $885
Changes in fair value of investments under the deferred compensation plan6,087
 2,326
 (1,354)
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities
 325
 (4,655)
Foreign currency exchange (losses) gains, net(1,838) (4,251) 744
(Loss) gain on sale of investments
 (265) 276
Other(549) 342
 335
Other income (expense), net$4,268
 $313
 $(3,769)
Employee Deferred Compensation Plan

We have a deferred compensation plan, which provides certain key employees, including our executive management, with the ability to defer the receipt of compensation in order to accumulate funds for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. We do not make contributions to the deferred compensation plan and we do not guarantee returns on the investments. Participant deferrals and investment gains and losses remain as our liabilities and the underlying assets are subject to claims of general creditors. In fiscal 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, we recognized changes in fair value of the assets under the deferred compensation plan in “Other income (expense), net” of $1.4$6.1 million, of interest expense, $3.0$2.3 million, and $6.4$(1.4) million, of interest income, respectively. The increase or decrease in the fair value of the investments relates to the increased or decreased performance of the portfolio on a year over year basis. Refer to Note 1718 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 for more information about our deferred compensation plan.

Gain on Sale of Investments in Marketable Equity Securities

In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we sold our investment in a certain marketable equity security for $2.2 million, which resulted in a realized gain of $1.1 million.

In connection with the acquisition of Ramtron, we recognized a gain of $1.7 million on our initial investment in Ramtron of $3.4 million. For more information about our acquisition, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

42


Unrealized (realized) loss on marketable securities

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 6.9 million ordinary shares of Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited (HHSL) for an aggregate price of $10.0 million in connection with their initial public offering. HHSL is the parent company of Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, which is


one of our strategic foundry partners.  We recorded an unrealized loss on our investment in HHSL’s ordinary shares of $4.7 million and $1.5 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, as a result of the decline in the fair market value of the investment.

Equity During 2016 the Company disposed the shares of HHSL and the realized gain was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

Share in Net Loss and Impairment of Equity Method Investee

During fiscal 2015, weInvestees

We have been making investments in Enovix Corporation ("Enovix"), a privately held development stage company. We invested an additional$5.6 million, $23.0 million and $28.0 million in a battery company. The additionalEnovix during 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively. Our investment in this company increased our ownership interest inholding comprised of 41.2%, 46.6% and 38.7% of Enovix's equity at the company’s outstanding stock from 26.2% asend of December 28,fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Since the fourth quarter of 2014 to 38.7% as of January 3, 2016.  Wewe have accountedbeen accounting for our investment in this entity underEnovix using the equity method of accounting sinceaccounting. During the fourth quarter of 2017, Enovix missed achieving certain key planned product development milestones. We considered various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the expectations of the investee's future cash flows and capital needs, the length of time the investee has been in a loss position, the ability to achieve milestones, and the near-term prospect of the investee and its exit strategy. Enovix’s estimated enterprise value is sensitive to its ability to achieve these milestones. Consequently, we believe our investment in Enovix has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment and we recorded a charge of $51.2 million.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, when2016, we changed from the cost methodbasis of accounting for our investment in Deca Technologies Inc. ("Deca") to the equity method of accounting. UnderAs at the equity methodend of accounting,fiscal year 2017 and 2016, our investment comprised 52.5% of Deca's equity.
During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, we are required to record our interest in the investee's reported net income or loss for each reporting period. Additionally, we are required to present our prior period financial results to reflect the equity method of accounting from the date of the initial investment in the company. Our results of operations include charges of $7.1recorded $8.7 million, $5.1$9.9 million and $1.9$7.1 million respectively for theour share of losses recorded by Enovix. During fiscal years ended 2015, 20142017 and 2013. Refer to Note 152016, we recorded $11.8 million and $8.2 million respectively for our share of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 for more detailed discussion.

losses recorded by Deca.

Income Taxes

Our income tax expense was $11.2 million and $2.6 million in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our income tax expense was $16.9 million in fiscal 2015. OurThe income tax benefit was $1.2 million and $7.8 million for fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. The tax expense for fiscal 20152017 was primarily a result ofattributable to non-U.S. income taxes on income earned in foreign jurisdictions.jurisdictions, and increase in tax reserves, primarily offset by tax benefits resulting from the recently passed tax legislation, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”). Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21%, the repeal of corporate alternative minimum taxes (AMT), the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. Based on the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing, the Company determined a provisional estimate of the impact of the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulative foreign subsidiary earnings. The Company estimates that the transition tax will result in the utilization of $46.0 million of net operating loss carryforwards against which the Company maintains a corresponding valuation allowance. As a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2017. The provisional amount related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax liabilities, based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, was a tax benefit inof $3.0 million. The provisional amount related to the repeal of corporate AMT was a tax benefit of $5.6 million as the prior year AMT credit will be refunded over 2018 - 2021. The income tax expense for fiscal 20142016 was primarily attributable to a release of previously accrued taxes of approximately $8.3 million related to settlements with taxing authorities and the lapsing of statutes of limitations, primarily offset by income taxes associated with our non-U.S. operations. The tax benefit in fiscal 2013 wasoperations, primarily attributable to aoffset by release of previously accrued taxes of approximately $13.8 million related to settlements with taxing authorities and the lapsing of statutes of limitation, primarily offset by income taxes associated with our non-U.S. operations.

limitation.


Our effective tax rate varies from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to earnings of foreign subsidiaries taxed at different rates and a full valuation allowance on net operating losses incurred in the U.S. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex global tax regulations. We regularly assess our tax positions in light of legislative, bilateral tax treaty, regulatory and judicial developments in the many countries in which we and our affiliates do business.

Non-U.S. tax authorities have completed their income tax examinations of our subsidiary in Israel for fiscal years 2008-2013 and our branch in Germany for fiscal years 2010 to 2013. Both Israel and Germany examinations did not result in material adjustments to our tax liabilities.


Income tax examinations of our Malaysian subsidiary for the fiscal years 2007 to 2012 and our ThailandPhilippine subsidiary for fiscal year 20102014 are in progress. We do not believe the ultimate outcome of these examinations will result in a material increase to our tax liability.

International revenues account for a significant portion of our total revenues, such that a material portion of our pretax income is earned and taxed outside the U.S. at rates ranging from 0% to 25%. The impact on our provision for income taxes of foreign income being taxed at rates different than the U.S. federal statutory rate was an


expense of approximately $67.7 million, an expense of $36.6 million, and expense of $22.4 million in 2017, 2016 and benefit of $37.5 million and $15.4 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates as compared to the U.S. statutory federal rate that had the most significant impact on our provision for foreign income taxes in the periods presented include the Cayman Islands, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand.

On July 27, 2015, in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, the U.S. Tax Court issued an opinion related to the treatment of stock-based compensation expense in an intercompany cost-sharing arrangement. On February 19, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service appealed the decision. A final decision has yet to be issued. At this time, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has not withdrawn the requirement to include stock-based compensation from its regulations. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the status of the current regulations, questions related to the scope of potential impact, and the risk of the Tax Court’s decision being overturned upon appeal, we have not recorded any impact related to this issue as of January 3, 2016.

43


December 31, 2017.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table summarizes our consolidated cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and working capital:

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

 

$

227,561

 

 

$

118,812

 

Working capital

 

$

322,376

 

 

$

37,479

 

 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments$151,596
 $121,144
 $227,561
Working capital, net$147,854
 $191,486
 $326,114
Key Components of Cash Flows

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

8,801

 

 

$

103,336

 

 

$

67,568

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

$

(79,087

)

 

$

(42,156

)

 

$

261

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

$

193,240

 

 

$

(43,453

)

 

$

(45,023

)

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities$403,487
 $217,419
 $8,801
Net cash used in investing activities$(14,429) $(613,439) $(79,087)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$(357,634) $289,502
 $193,240

Fiscal 2015:

2017:

Operating Activities

In fiscal 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was $8.8 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $103.3 million in fiscal 2014.  

Net cash provided by operating activities induring fiscal 20152017 was primarily due to a$403.5 million. The net loss of $378.9$80.8 million adjusted for aincluded net non-cash items of $293.6 million and a net$463.2 million. Net cash provided by changeoperating activities benefited from a $21.1 million decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $96.4 million.liabilities. The non-cash adjustmentsitems primarily consisted of of:
depreciation and amortization of $243.8$264.9 million,
stock based compensation expense of $93.5$91.6 million, non-cash restructuring charges
share in net loss and impairment of $8.6equity method investees of $71.8 million,
accretion of interest expense on 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes, 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, and 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes and amortization of debt and financing costs on other debt of $21.1 million, and gain on the sale
restructuring costs and other of our TrueTouch® mobile business of $66.5 million. $9.0 million,

The increase in net cash provided bydue to changes in operating assets and liabilities during fiscal 2017 of $21.1 million was primarily due to the following:

a decrease in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities of $59.0 million mainly due to timing of payments and payments related to restructuring activities;


an increase in price adjustments and other distributor related reserved of $19.1 million;
an increase in inventories of $228.3$14.3 million offset by to support increased expected demand for IoT and other MCD products;
an increase in other current and long-term assets of $9.6 million, primarily due to timing of payments for certain licenses; and
an increase in accounts receivables of $117.4$37.0 million mainly due to an increase in other assets of $6.0 million, decrease in accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities of $54.3 million and a decrease in deferred income of $14.2 million. The decrease in inventory was primarily due to $133.0 million of reserves recorded to write down inventory assumed from the Merger and was recognized as part of the Company's strategy to focus on high margin, profitable business as a combined company and to move away from the production and sale of inventory associated with non-strategic businesses.

revenue.


Investing Activities


In fiscal 2015,2017, we used $79.1approximately $14.4 million of cash in our investing activities compared to $42.2 million in fiscal 2014.  The cash we used in investing activities in fiscal 2015 was primarily due to $105.1to:

$35.5 million in netof cash paidreceived on the Merger as partsale of purchasethe wafer manufacturing facility located in Bloomington, Minnesota and a building in Austin, Texas,
receipt of $10.0 million of previously escrowed consideration $47.2from the divestiture of our TrueTouch® mobile touchscreen business,
$2.3 million of cash received on the sales of property and equipment
the above increases were offset by $54.3 million of cash used for property and equipment expenditures $28.0relating to purchases of certain tooling, laboratory and manufacturing facility equipment and $9.3 million cash paid forrelated to our equity investmentsmethod and $6.1 million paid for a cost method investment. These increases were partially offset by $17.4investments.

Financing Activities

In fiscal 2017, we used approximately $357.6 million of proceeds from the sales or maturities of investments and $98.6 million of cash proceeds from the sale of our TrueTouch® Mobile business, of the total cash proceeds received from the sale of our TrueTouch® mobile business, $10.0 million are held in an Escrow account until January 2017.

Financing Activities

In fiscal 2015, we generated $193.2 million of cash from our financing activities compared to $43.4 million in fiscal 2014.  The cash we used in our financing activities, in fiscal 2015 was primarily related our to:


$144.7 million dividend payments,
net borrowingsrepayments of $242.0 million on the revolving credit facilitySenior Secured Revolving Credit Facility,
$128.0 million repayment of $537.02% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes, and
$118.7 million borrowingsrepayment of $97.2 million on Term Loan A net of costs, proceeds from settlement of capped calls which were assumed as part of and Term Loan B.
the Merger of $25.3 million and net proceeds from the issuance of common shares under our employee stock plans of $52.3 million. The increasesabove payments were offset by $315.0 million repayment of line of credit facility, $128.0$91.3 million of dividend payments, $55.1borrowings under Term Loan B and $150.0 million of repurchase of treasury stock and $9.6 million cash used for yield enhanced structured agreements settled in common stock.

44


borrowing under 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes.


Fiscal 2014:

2016:

Operating Activities

In fiscal 2014, net


Net cash provided by operating activities of $217.4 million during fiscal 2016 was $103.3primarily due to a net loss of $683.9 million comparedoffset by net non-cash items of $877.3 million and a $24.0 million increase in cash due to $67.6changes in operating assets and liabilities. The non-cash items primarily consisted of:

depreciation and amortization of $265.9 million,
stock based compensation expense of $98.5 million,
restructuring costs and other of $27.2 million
accretion of interest expense on Senior Exchangeable Notes and amortization of debt and financing costs on other debt of $13.1 million,
Share in fiscal 2013. net loss of equity method investees of $17.6 million,
goodwill impairment charge of $488.5 million,
gain related to investment in Deca Technologies Inc. of $112.8 million,
impairment charge related to assets held for sale of $37.2 million, and
impairment charge for acquisition-related IPR&D of $33.9 million.

The increase in net cash due to changes in operating cash flows forassets and liabilities during fiscal 20142016 of $24.0 million, was primarily due to the following:

an increase in accounts receivable of $41.0 million due to an increase in net incomesales during fiscal 2016. The days sales outstanding for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 were 61 days;
an increase in inventories of $66.2$33.7 million compared to fiscal 2013. Our operating cash flow for 2014primarily as a result of $103.3the IoT acquisition;
an increase in other current and long-term assets of $12.2 million, was primarily due to our nettiming of payments for certain licenses;


an increase in accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities of $79.5 million due to timing of payments; and
a decrease in deferred income of $16.5$69.0 million net favorable non-cash adjustmentsdue to our netthe transition of additional product families to the sell-in basis of revenue recognition. The decrease in deferred income including stock-based compensationwas offset by an increase in price adjustment reserve for sale to distributors of $50.2$100.4 million and depreciation and amortization of $46.7 million, and a netdue to the change in working capitalrevenue recognition for certain product families in fiscal 2016 on a sell-in basis, which required us to record a reserve for distributor price adjustments based on our estimate of $15.7 million.

historical experience rates.


Investing Activities


In fiscal 2014, net2016, we used approximately $613.4 million of cash used in investing activities was $42.2 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $0.3 million in fiscal 2013. The net cash used in our investing activities in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to investment purchasesto:
$550.0 million for the acquisition of $23.4the IoT business,
$57.4 million purchases of cash used for property and equipment expenditures relating to purchases of $20.9certain tooling, laboratory and manufacturing facility equipment and
$27.1 million andcash paid for certain investments, madewhich included $23.0 million towards our investment in other entities accounted for under the cost or equity methodEnovix.
such uses of accounting of $18.4 million,cash were offset by the proceeds from salessale and maturities of investments of $16.6$85.9 million.


Financing Activities


In fiscal 2014, net2016, we generated approximately $289.5 million of cash used infrom financing activities, was $43.4primarily from
our borrowings on the 4.50% Senior Exchangeable Notes of $287.5 million, compared to $45.0
$450.0 million in fiscal 2013. borrowing on our Term Loan B and
proceeds of $43.9 million from employee equity awards.

The cash we used in our financing activities in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to payment of dividends of $69.2 million and the repayment of debt and obligations under capital leases of $6.3 million,above borrowings were offset by
the repurchase of stock in the amount of $175.7 million,
net proceedsrepayments of $32 million from the issuance of common shares under our employee stock plans.

Fiscal 2013:

Operating Activities

In fiscal 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $67.6 million compared to $135 million in fiscal 2012. The decrease in operating cash flows for fiscal 2013 was primarily due to an increase in net loss of $24.8 million compared to fiscal 2012. Our operating cash flow for fiscal 2013 of $67.6 million was primarily due to our net loss of $50.1 million, offset by net favorable non-cash adjustments to our net loss including stock-based compensation of $73.0 million, depreciation and amortization of $48.4 million, and a net change in working capital of $20.1 million.

Investing Activities

In fiscal 2013, net cash provided by investing activities was $0.3 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $113.0 million in fiscal 2012. The cash provided by our investing activities in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to sales of investments of $64.4 million offset by investment purchases of $23.1 million, and purchases of property and equipment of $36.6 million primarily for our Emerging Technologies Division.

Financing Activities

In fiscal 2013, net cash used in financing activities was $45.0 million compared to $58.5 million in fiscal 2012. The cash we used in our financing activities in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to payment of dividends of $64.8 million, repayment on our long term revolving credit facility (Credit facility) of $145.0 million and repayment of other debt of $17.1 million, partially offset by net proceeds of $38.7 million from the issuance of common shares under our employee stock plans, and borrowings of $140.0$312.0 million on our Credit facility.

45


Liquidity and Contractual obligations

Stock Repurchase Programs:

On October 20, 2015, our Board authorized a new $450 million stock buyback program. In connection with the approval of the new share repurchase plan, the share repurchase plan previously approved in September 2011 was terminated.  The program allows us to purchase our common stock or enter into equity derivative transactions related to our common stock. The timing and actual amount expended with the new authorized funds will depend on a variety of factors including the market price of our common stock, regulatory, legal, and contractual requirements, alternatives uses of cash, availability of on shore cash and other market factors. The program does not obligate us to repurchase any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at our discretion. From September 2011 through the termination of the program, we used $327.4 million from the program to repurchase 24.4 million shares at an average share price of $13.4. Under the new program authorized in October, 2015 through the end of fiscal 2015, we used $56.5 million to repurchase 5.7 million share at an average price of $10.0.

As of February 26, 2016, we repurchased a total of 29.3 million shares for a total cost of $237.8 million under the new program. As of February 26, 2016, the total dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program is approximately $212.2 million.

Yield Enhancement Program (“YEP”):

As discussed under Item 5 above and in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8, we have periodically entered into short term yield enhanced structured agreements since fiscal 2009.

In fiscal 2014, we entered into short-term yield enhanced structured agreements with maturities ranging from 30 to 45 days at an aggregate price of $19.4 million. Upon settlement of these agreements, we received $19.7 million in cash. In fiscal 2013 we didn’t enter into any short-term yield enhanced structured agreements.

In fiscal 2015, we entered into a short-term yield enhanced structured agreements with maturities ranging from 10 to 30 days at an aggregate price of $38.6 million. Upon settlement of these agreements, we received $29.4 million in cash and one million shares at an average price of $9.60.

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility

On October 17, 2013, we amended our credit facility to reduce the revolving commitments to $300 million. In connection with the reduction, certain financial covenants were amended. The amended financial covenants include the following conditions: 1) maximum senior secured leverage ratio of 2.50 to 1.00 through January 1, 2017 and 2.25 to 1.00 thereafter, 2) maximum total leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.00 through January 3, 2015, 3.5 to 1.00 through January 1, 2017 and 3.00 to 1.00 thereafter, 3) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00, and 4) minimum liquidity of at least $100 million. Borrowings are collateralized by substantially all assets of the company.

On March 12, 2015, we amended and restated our existing senior secured revolving credit facility, (“Credit Facility”)

$141.4 million dividend payments,
purchase of capped call for the 4.50% Senior Exchangeable Notes of $8.2 million and increased the size
repayments of the Credit Facility from $300 million to $450 million. The restated agreement also contains an option permitting us to arrange additional commitments of $250 million (“Incremental Availability”)capital leases and specifies that the proceeds of these loans may be used for working capital, acquisitions, stock repurchases and general corporate purposes. The borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest, at the Company's option, at an adjusted base rate plus a spread of 1.25%, or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread of 2.25%. The borrowings under the Credit Facility are collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. The financial covenants were amended to include the following conditions: 1) maximum total leverage ratio of 3.50 to 1.00 through January 1, 2017, and 3.00 to 1.00 thereafter, 2) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00. At January 3, 2016, the Company's outstanding borrowings of $449.0 million were recorded as part of long-term liabilities and are presented as “Long-term revolving credit facility and long term debt��� on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  We incurred financing costs of $2.3 million to the new lenders of the Credit Facility which has been capitalized and recognized in other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the life of the Credit Facility.

As per the terms of the Credit Facility, we entered into a Joinder Agreement on December 22, 2015 under which we borrowed an additional $97.2 million (“Term Loan A”), net of costs. Term Loan A of $10.6 million.

Liquidity and Contractual Obligations
Summary of our debt balances is subjectincluded below:
  December 31, 2017
  Principal amount outstanding Less: Unamortized discount and issuance costs Net carrying value outstanding
  (in thousand)
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility $90,000
 $
 $90,000
Term Loan B 511,924
 16,541
 495,383
2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes 21,990
 1,615
 20,375
4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes 287,500
 40,864
 246,636
2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes 150,000
 18,578
 131,422
Total Debt $1,061,414
 $77,598
 $983,816
Of the total principal amount outstanding, $27.3 million related to at the Company’s option, either an interest rate equal to (i) 3.25% over LIBOR or (ii) an interest rate equal to 2.25% over the greater of (x) the prime lending rate published by the Wall Street Journal, (y) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, and (z) the LIBOR rate for a one month interest period plus 1%. The Company paid a 1.00% upfront fee in connection with thetotal Term Loan A.  

46


B is classified as current liabilities as of December 31, 2017.



  January 1, 2017
  Principal amount outstanding Less: Unamortized discount and issuance costs Net carrying value outstanding
  (in thousand)
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility $332,000
 $
 $332,000
Term Loan B 444,375
 15,661
 428,714
Term Loan A 95,000
 2,662
 92,338
Capital lease obligations 40
 
 40
Equipment loans 112
 
 112
2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes 149,990
 14,589
 135,401
4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes 287,500
 50,974
 236,526
Total Debt $1,309,017
 $83,886
 $1,225,131
Of the total principal amount outstanding, $22.5 million related to Term Loan B, $7.5 million related to Term Loan A, $0.1 million related to Equipment loans, and $40 thousand related to Capital lease obligation, were classified as current liabilities as of January 1, 2017.
The Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, as amended, provides for a $540 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility of which $450 million revolving credit facilitywas undrawn as at December 31, 2017.
We believe that the liquidity provided by existing cash, cash equivalents and generally containsavailable-for-sale investments and our borrowing arrangements will provide sufficient capital to meet our requirements for at least the same representationsnext twelve months. However, should economic conditions and/or financial, business and warranties, covenants, and events of default that it contained prior toother factors beyond our control adversely affect the effectiveness of the Amendment. The Amendment did not change the interest rate or maturity applicable to the Credit Facility and the Credit Facility remains guaranteed by certain present and future wholly-owned material domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) and secured by a security interest in substantially allestimates of our assetsfuture cash requirements, we could be required to fund our cash requirements by alternative financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if needed, would be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. In addition, we may choose at any time to raise additional capital or debt to strengthen our financial position, facilitate growth, enter into strategic initiatives (including the acquisition of other companies) and the Guarantors.

On January 6, 2016, we entered into an Incremental Revolving Joinder Agreementprovide us with additional flexibility to our Credit Facility to increase the amounttake advantage of revolving commitments under our Credit Facility by an additional $90 million. The total aggregate amount of revolving commitments under the Credit Facility starting January 6, 2016 is $540 million.

The proceeds of the loans made under the Credit Facility may be used for working capital, acquisitions, stock repurchases and general corporate purposes.other business opportunities that arise. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, $449.5 million aggregate principal amount of loans and letters of credit are outstanding under the Credit Facility and none of the Incremental Availability has been used.

As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility.

Refer to Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 for more information on our senior secured revolving credit facility.

debt obligations.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of January 3, 2016:

December 31, 2017:

 

 

Total

 

 

2016

 

 

2017 and 2018

 

 

2019 and 2020

 

 

After 2020

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Purchase obligations (1)

 

$

167,415

 

 

$

160,532

 

 

$

6,883

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Equipment loan

 

 

3,003

 

 

 

3,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease commitments (2)

 

 

74,815

 

 

 

16,171

 

 

 

22,240

 

 

 

12,569

 

 

 

23,835

 

Capital lease commitments

 

 

7,314

 

 

 

6,715

 

 

 

599

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes

 

 

149,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

149,990

 

 

 

 

Term Loan A

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

 

Interest payments on debt

 

 

79,915

 

 

 

18,817

 

 

 

36,598

 

 

 

24,500

 

 

 

 

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

449,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

449,000

 

 

 

 

License fee commitments (3)

 

 

5,880

 

 

 

5,880

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

 

$

1,037,332

 

 

$

216,118

 

 

$

81,320

 

 

$

716,059

 

 

$

23,835

 

 Total 2018 2019 and 2020 2021 and 2022 After 2022
 (In thousands)
Purchase obligations (1)$455,075
 $200,421
 $247,957
 $6,697
 $
Operating lease commitments (2)66,392
 15,258
 21,764
 12,306
 17,064
2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes150,000
 
 
 
 150,000
4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes287,500
 
 
 287,500
 
2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes21,990
 
 21,990
 
 
Term Loan B511,924
 27,303
 71,669
 412,952
 
Interest payment on debt146,450
 39,436
 78,639
 28,120
 255
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility90,000
 
 90,000
 
 
Asset retirement obligations$5,693
 $223
 $3,274
 $1,857
 $339
Total contractual obligations$1,735,024
 $282,641
 $535,293
 $749,432
 $167,658


(1)

(1)Purchase obligations primarily include non-cancelable purchase orders for materials, services, manufacturing equipment, building improvements and supplies in the ordinary course of business. Purchase obligations are defined as enforceable agreements that are legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including quantity, price and timing.

timing, that have remaining terms in excess of one year.

(2)

(2)Operating leases includes payments relating to Spansion's lease for office space in San Jose for a new headquarters entered on May 22, 2014, which is no longer required. The lease is for a period of 12 years, with two options to extend for periods of five years each after the initial lease term. The term of the lease commenced on January1,January 1, 2015 and expires on December 31, 2026.

We do not plan to exercise the option to extend the lease beyond 2026.

(3)

On April 30, 2012, we entered into a patent license agreement whereby we paid a total patent license fee of $14.0 million in fiscal 2012 and committed to pay another $5.9 million on or before April 30, 2016 representing fees for future purchases of patents and patent related services. In June 2015, the Company paid an additional license fee of $18.5 million under the existing license agreement due to the merger with Spansion in March 2015.

As of January 3, 2016December 31, 2017, our unrecognized tax benefits were $28.4$28.9 million, which were classified as long-term liabilities. We believe it is possible that we may recognize approximately $7$0.2 million of our existing unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitations and the resolution of agreements with domestic and various foreign tax authorities.

47


Sale As of Spansion's Sunnyvale property

On January 23, 2014, Spansion sold its property in Sunnyvale, California, consistingDecember 31, 2017, we had long-term pension and other employee related liabilities of 24.5 acres of land with approximately 471,000 square feet of buildings that included its headquarters building and submicron development center, a Pacific Gas & Electric transmission facility and a warehouse building, for net consideration of $59.0 million. Spansion concurrently leased back approximately 170,000 square feet of the headquarters building on a month-to-month basis with the option to continue the lease for up to 24 months; thereafter either party could terminate the lease. The first six months of the lease$16.8 million, which were rent free; thereafter the rents were lower than the market rates. For accounting purposes, these rents were deemed to have been netted against the sale proceeds and represent prepaid rent. As such, the use of the property after its sale constituted continuing involvement, and recognition of the sale of the property was deferred until the lease period ended. In the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we terminated the lease on the Sunnyvale building and recognized an immaterial gain.

Equity Investment Commitments

As disclosed in Note 19 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we have committed to purchase additional preferred stock from a company that operates in the area of advanced battery storage. During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016, we purchased $28.0 million of preferred stock which was recordedclassified as part of our investments in non-marketable securities. Subject to the attainment of certain milestones, we may purchase additional preferred stock of this company.

long-term liabilities.

Capital Resources and Financial Condition

Our long-term strategy is to maintain a minimum amount of cash for operational purposes and to invest the remaining amount of our cash in interest-bearing and highly liquid cash equivalents and debt securities, repayment of debt, the purchase of our stock through our stock buyback program and payments of regularly scheduled cash dividends. In addition we may use excess cash to invest in our ETD, enter into strategic investments and partnerships and pursue acquisitions. Our investment policy defines three main objectives when buying investments: security of principal, liquidity, and maximization of after-tax yield. We invest excess cash in various financial securities subject to certain requirements including security type, duration, concentration limits, and credit rating profile.
As of January 3, 2016 in addition to $226.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, we had $0.9 million invested in short-term investments forDecember 31, 2017, a total cash and short-term investment position of $227.6$151.6 million that is available for use in current operations.

As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, approximately 63.0%20% of our cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments are held outside of the United States. While these amounts are primarily invested in U.S. dollars, a portion is held in foreign currencies. All offshore balances are exposed to local political, banking, currency control and other risks. In addition, these amounts, if repatriated may be subject to tax and other transfer restrictions.


On February 17, 2017, we amended our Credit Facility which includes the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loans. The amendment reduced the applicable margins on the Term Loan B and Term Loan A from 5.50% and 5.11%, respectively, to 3.75% effective February 17, 2017. Additionally, the amended financial covenants include the following conditions: 1) maximum total leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.00 through December 31, 2017 and 2) maximum total leverage ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 through July 1, 2018 and 3.75 to 1.00 thereafter. We incurred financing costs of $5.9 million to lenders of the Term Loans which were capitalized and recognized as a reduction of the Term Loan A and Term Loan B balances in “Credit Facility and long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs will be amortized over the life of the Term Loans and are recorded in “Interest Expense” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On April 7, 2017, we further amended our Credit Facility. The amendment reduced the applicable margins on our Term Loan A from 3.75% to 2.75% effective April 7, 2017. We incurred financing costs of $0.4 million to lenders of Term Loan A which were recognized as a reduction of the Term Loan A balance in “Long-term credit facility and long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On August 18, 2017, we amended our Credit Facility. As a result of the amendment, Term Loan A borrowing of $91.3 million was extinguished as a separate borrowing. Term Loan B was increased by $91.3 million to replace Term Loan A (the "Additional Incremental Term Loan"). Previously unamortized debt issuance costs of $3.0 million related to Term Loan A were written off and recorded as "Interest expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during fiscal 2017. The additional incremental term loan is subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement and the additional terms set forth in the amendment. The amendment also reduced the applicable margins on Term Loan B from 3.75% to 2.75% effective August 18, 2017. We incurred financing costs of $0.6 million to the lenders of the Term Loans which have been capitalized and recognized as a reduction of the Term Loan B balances in “Credit facility and long-term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the life of the Term Loans and are recorded in “Interest Expense” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.



On November 6, 2017, the Company entered into an indenture (the “Indenture”), by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), pursuant to which the Company issued a total of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 2.00% per year, payable in cash on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2018.  The Notes will mature on February 1, 2023, unless earlier repurchased or converted.

In December 2017, we entered into fixed-for-floating interest rate forward swap agreements (expiring July 2021) with two counterparties starting from April 2018, to swap variable interest payments on our debt for fixed interest payments. The aggregate notional amount of these interest rate swaps was $300 million.

On November 17, 2017, the Company entered into a privately negotiated agreement to induce the extinguishment of a portion of the Spansion Notes. The Company paid the holders of the Spansion Notes cash in the aggregate principal of $128 million and delivered 17.3 million shares of common stock for the conversion spread. The Company recorded $4.3 million in loss on extinguishment, which included $1.2 million paid in cash as an inducement premium and a reduction in additional paid-in capital of $290.6 million towards the deemed repurchase of the equity component of the notes. As of December 31, 2017, the remaining principal amount was $22.0 million. The Notes will mature on September 1, 2020 unless earlier repurchased or converted.
We believe that liquidity provided by existing cash, cash equivalents and investments, our cash from operations and our borrowing arrangements will provide sufficient capital to meet our requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, should prevailingif economic conditions deteriorate, debt covenants constraints,unexpectedly impact our business, and/or financial, business and other factors beyond our control adversely affect our estimates of our future cash requirements, we could be required to fund our cash requirements by alternative financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if needed, would be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. We may also choose at any time to raise additional capital or debt to strengthen our financial position, facilitate growth, enter into strategic initiatives including the acquisition of other companies, repurchases ofrepurchase shares of our stock, or increase our dividends or pay a special dividend and provide us with additional flexibility to take advantage of other business opportunities that arise.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement its consolidated financial results presented in accordance with GAAP, Cypress uses non-GAAP measures to assess the following financial measures which are adjusted from the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures:

·

Revenue

·

Gross margin

·

Research and development expenses

·

Selling, general and administrative expenses

·

Operating income (loss)

·

Net income (loss)

·

Diluted net income (loss) per share

48


The non-GAAP measures set forth above exclude charges primarily related to Spansion merger costs and related amortization, which represented approximately 83% of total adjustments for the year ended January 3, 2016 as well as stock-based compensation, restructuring charges, acquisition-related expenses and other adjustments. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional and useful way of viewing aspects of Cypress’s operations that, when viewed in conjunction with Cypress’s GAAP results, provide a more comprehensive understanding of the various factors and trends affecting Cypress’s business and operations. Management uses these non-GAAP measures for strategic and business decision-making, internal budgeting, forecasting and resource allocation processes. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate management’s internal comparisons to Cypress’s historical operating results and comparisons to competitors’ operating results. Pursuant to the requirements of Regulation G and to make clear to our investors the adjustments we make to GAAP measures, we have provided a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per shares amounts)

 

Non-GAAP revenue

 

$

1,626,603

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

$

722,693

 

Non-GAAP gross margin

 

$

573,518

 

 

$

381,716

 

 

$

377,261

 

Non-GAAP research and development expenses

 

$

252,244

 

 

$

147,098

 

 

$

161,764

 

Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses

 

$

231,198

 

 

$

137,858

 

 

$

143,071

 

Non-GAAP operating income

 

$

90,075

 

 

$

96,759

 

 

$

72,426

 

Non-GAAP pretax profit

 

$

78,213

 

 

$

91,187

 

 

$

66,013

 

Non-GAAP net income attributable to Cypress

 

$

70,532

 

 

$

87,291

 

 

$

63,221

 

Non-GAAP diluted net income per share attributable to

   Cypress

 

$

0.21

 

 

$

0.52

 

 

$

0.39

 

We believe that providing these Non-GAAP financial measures, in addition to the GAAP financial results, are useful to investors because they allow investors to see our results “through the eyes” of management as these Non-GAAP financial measures reflect our internal measurement processes. Management believes that these Non-GAAP financial measures enable investors to better assess changes in each key element of our operating results across different reporting periods on a consistent basis and provides investors with another method for assessing our operating results in a manner that is focused on the performance of our ongoing operations.

49


CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

(In thousands, except per-share data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

 

 

% of

 

 

December 28,

 

 

% of

 

 

December 29,

 

 

% of

 

 

 

2016

 

 

Revenue

 

 

2014

 

 

Revenue

 

 

2013

 

 

Revenue

 

GAAP Revenues

 

$

1,607,853

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

722,693

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue from intellectual property license (1)

 

 

18,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Revenues

 

$

1,626,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

722,693

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP gross margin

 

$

400,003

 

 

 

24.9

%

 

$

363,677

 

 

 

50.1

%

 

$

338,572

 

 

 

46.8

%

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

16,459

 

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

13,209

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

12,789

 

 

 

1.8

%

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

(37

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

427

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

854

 

 

 

0.1

%

Ramtron acquisition related expense

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(86

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

24,805

 

 

 

3.4

%

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

(687

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

4,489

 

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

241

 

 

 

0.0

%

Effect of Non-GAAP revenue from intellectual property license

 

 

18,750

 

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

139,030

 

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Non-GAAP gross margin

 

$

573,518

 

 

 

35.3

%

 

$

381,716

 

 

 

52.6

%

 

$

377,261

 

 

 

52.2

%

GAAP research and development expenses

 

$

281,391

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

164,560

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

190,906

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

(25,719

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,187

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(26,042

)

 

 

 

 

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(793

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,744

)

 

 

 

 

Ramtron acquisition related expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(252

)

 

 

 

 

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

(980

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(482

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,104

)

 

 

 

 

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

(2,681

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP research and development expenses

 

$

252,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

147,098

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

161,764

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses

 

$

295,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

176,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

182,671

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

(51,350

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20,774

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34,187

)

 

 

 

 

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

260

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,855

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,795

)

 

 

 

 

Ramtron acquisition related expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,330

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,168

)

 

 

 

 

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

(177

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(97

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(450

)

 

 

 

 

Legal and other

 

 

(1,198

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,330

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

(11,814

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses

 

$

231,198

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

137,858

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

143,071

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP operating income (loss)

 

$

(336,905

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

22,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(58,195

)

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

93,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,020

 

 

 

 

 

Gain from divestiture transaction

 

 

(66,472

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ramtron acquisition-related expense

 

 

5,220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,056

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

(531

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,393

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,152

 

 

 

 

 

Legal and other

 

 

1,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,330

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of Non-GAAP revenue from intellectual property license

 

 

18,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

374,852

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP operating income (loss)

 

$

90,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

96,759

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

72,426

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP pretax profit (loss)

 

$

(364,178

)

 

 

(22.6

)%

 

$

15,345

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

$

(57,847

)

 

 

(8.0

)%

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

93,527

 

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

50,170

 

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

73,020

 

 

 

10.1

%

Gain from divestiture transaction

 

 

(66,472

)

 

 

(4.1

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Ramtron acquisition-related expense

 

 

5,220

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

14,244

 

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

34,056

 

 

 

4.7

%

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

820

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

61

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

22

 

 

 

0.0

%

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

458

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

3,737

 

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

17,152

 

 

 

2.4

%

Legal and other

 

 

1,450

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

1,330

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Effect of Non-GAAP revenue from intellectual property license

 

 

18,291

 

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Investment related losses (gains)

 

 

4,058

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

1,495

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Tax-related, interest income, interest expense and

   other expenses

 

 

3,039

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

(263

)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

(2,267

)

 

 

(0.3

)%

Losses from equity method investment

 

 

7,148

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

5,068

 

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

1,877

 

 

 

0.3

%

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

374,852

 

 

 

23.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Non-GAAP pretax profit (loss)

 

$

78,213

 

 

 

4.8

%

 

$

91,187

 

 

 

12.6

%

 

$

66,013

 

 

 

9.2

%

50


 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

 

 

% of

 

 

December 28,

 

 

% of

 

 

December 29,

 

 

% of

 

 

 

2016

 

 

Revenue

 

 

2014

 

 

Revenue

 

 

2013

 

 

Revenue

 

GAAP net income (loss) attributable to Cypress

 

$

(378,867

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

17,936

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(48,242

)

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

93,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,020

 

 

 

 

 

Gain from divestiture transaction

 

 

(66,472

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

Ramtron acquisition-related expense

 

 

5,220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,056

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,737

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,151

 

 

 

 

 

Legal and other

 

 

1,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,330

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of Non-GAAP revenue from intellectual property license

 

 

18,291

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

Investment related losses (gains)

 

 

4,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,266

)

 

 

 

 

Tax-related, interest income, interest expense and other

   expenses

 

 

10,047

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,750

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12,398

)

 

 

 

 

Losses from equity method investment

 

 

7,148

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,878

 

 

 

 

 

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

374,852

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP net income attributable to Cypress

 

$

70,532

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

87,291

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

63,221

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP net income (loss) per share attributable to

   Cypress - diluted

 

$

(1.25

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.31

)

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

0.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.45

 

 

 

 

 

Gain from divestiture transaction

 

 

(0.22

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ramtron acquisition-related expense

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.21

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in value of deferred compensation plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of assets, restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of Non-GAAP revenue from intellectual property license

 

 

0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment related losses (gains)

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

Tax-related, interest income, interest expense and other

   expenses

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.04

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.08

)

 

 

 

 

Losses from equity method investment

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal and other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP share count adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

Spansion merger costs and related amortization

 

 

1.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP net income per share attributable to

   Cypress - diluted

 

$

0.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.39

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Non-GAAP revenue includes for the three and twelve months ended January 3, 2016 includes $6.25 million and $17.5 million of Samsung intellectual property licensing revenue, not included in GAAP revenue as a result of the effect of purchase accounting for the Spansion Merger.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the data used to prepare them. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and we are required to make estimates, judgments and assumptions in the course of such preparation. Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate our judgments and estimates including those related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, inventory valuation, valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and financial instruments, stock-based compensation, and settlement costs, and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, knowledge of current conditions and our beliefs of what could occur in the future considering available information. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies that are affected by significant estimates, assumptions and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are as follows:

Revenue Recognition:

We generate revenues by selling products to distributors, various types of manufacturers including original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and electronic manufacturing service providers (“EMSs”). We recognize revenue on sales to OEMs and EMSs provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title has transferred, collection of resulting receivables is reasonably assured, there are no customer acceptance requirements, and there are no remaining significant obligations.

51



Sales to certain distributors are made under agreements which provide the distributors with price protection, stock rotation and other allowances under certain circumstances. When we determine that the uncertainties associated with the rights given to these distributors, revenues and costs related to distributorThe Company typically recognizes revenue from sales are deferred untilof its products are sold by the distributors to the end customers. In those circumstances, revenues are recognized upon receiving notification from the distributors that products have been sold to the end customers. In these cases, at the time of shipment to distributors we record a trade receivableupon shipment. An allowance for the sellingestimated distributor credits covering price since thereadjustments is a legally enforceable right to receive payment, relieves inventory for the value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributors,recorded based on historical experience rates as well as economic conditions and defers the related margin and price adjustment as deferred income on sales to distributors on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.contractual terms. Any effects of change in estimates related to distributor price adjustments are recorded as a reductionan adjustment to deferred income at the time the distributors sell the productsrevenue.



Prior to the end customers and the distributor submits a valid claim for the price adjustment.

We have historically2014, we had recognized a significant portion of revenue through distributors at the time the distributor resold the product to its end customer (also referred to as the sell-through basis of revenue recognition) given the difficulty, at the time, in estimating the ultimate price of these product shipments and amount of potential returns. We continuously reassessesreassess our ability to reliably estimate the ultimate price of these products and, over the past several years, have made investments in our systems and processprocesses around ourits distribution channel to improve the quality of the information it receives from ourits distributors. Given these ongoing investments, and based on the financial framework we use for estimating potential price adjustments, beginningin the fourth quarter of 2014 we concluded that we were able to reasonable estimate returns and pricing concessionsbegan recognizing revenue on certain product families and with certain distributors and we recognized revenue at the time it shipped these specific products to the identified distributors, less(less its estimate of future price adjustments and returns. As a result of this change, we recognized an incremental $12.3 millionreturns) upon shipment to the distributors (also referred to as the sell-in basis of revenue during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The impact of this change resulted in an increase of $6.2 million to net income attributable to Cypress for fiscal 2014, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share. recognition).


During fiscal 2015, we recognized $40.9 million of incremental revenue from this change, which resulted in a decrease in net loss of $25.0 million or $0.07$0.08 per basic and diluted shares.

During fiscal 2015,2016, we recognized $780.8approximately $59.2 million of incremental revenue from this change in revenue recognition, which resulted in a reduction of our net loss of $19.5 million for fiscal 2016, or 68%$0.06 per basic and diluted share. By the end of distributionfiscal 2016, the Company had transitioned all revenue on afrom distributions from sell-through to the sell-in basis.

basis of revenue recognition.

We record as a reduction to revenues reserves for sales returns, price protection and allowances, based upon historical experience rates and for any specific known customer amounts. We also provide certain distributors and EMSs with volume-pricing discounts, such as rebates and incentives, which are recorded as a reduction to revenues at the time of sale. Historically these volume discounts have not been significant.

Our revenue reporting is highly dependent on receiving pertinent, accurate and timely data from our distributors. Distributors provide us periodic data regarding the product, price, quantity, and end customer when products are resold as well as the quantities of our products they still have in stock. Because the data set is large and complex and because there may be errors in the reported data, we must use estimates and apply judgments to reconcile distributors’ reported inventories to their activities. Actual results could vary materially from those estimates.

Business Combinations:

We apply the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), in the accounting for acquisitions. It requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Accounting for business combinations requires the Company's management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date including our estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed, restructuring liabilities, pre-acquisition contingencies and contingent consideration, where applicable. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates it has made have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include but are not limited to: future expected cash flows from product sales, customer contracts and acquired technologies, expected costs to develop in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed and discount rates. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.

52


Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Receivable:

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for losses that we estimate will arise from our customers’ inability to make required payments. We make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable by considering factors such as historical bad debt experience, specific customer creditworthiness, the age of the accounts receivable balances and current economic trends that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. If the data we use to calculate the allowance for doubtful accounts does not reflect the future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and our results of operations could be materially affected.

Valuation of Inventories:

Management periodically reviews the adequacy of our inventory reserves. We record a write-down for our inventories which have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or net realizable value. We perform a detailed review of inventories each quarter that considers multiple factors including demand forecasts,


product life cycle status, product development plans and current sales levels. Inventory reserves are not relieved until the related inventory has been sold or scrapped. Our inventories may be subject to rapid technological obsolescence and are sold in a highly competitive industry. If there were a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or if there were a higher incidence of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements, we could be required to record additional write-downs, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. In fiscal 2015, we recorded approximately $133 million of inventory reserves to write down inventory assumed as part of the merger.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets:

Our business requires heavy investment in manufacturing facilities and equipment that are technologically advanced but can quickly become significantly under-utilized or rendered obsolete by rapid changes in demand. In addition, we have recorded intangible assets with finite lives related to our acquisitions.

We evaluate our long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and purchased intangible assets with finite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could result in an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the assets or the strategy for our business, significant negative industry or economic trends, and a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time. Impairments are recognized based on the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value, and fair value is generally measured based on discounted cash flow analysis. If there is a significant adverse change in our business in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges on our long-lived assets.

Valuation of Goodwill:

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. We assess our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and,basis. Additionally, if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, we will also perform an impairment assessment on an interim basis. In accordance with ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, qualitative factors can be assessed to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test for goodwill impairment. If we believe, as a result of our qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required.

Cash Flow Hedges:
We have four reporting units of which two, Memory Products division (MPD)recognize derivative instruments from hedging activities as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and Programmable Systems Division (PSD), have goodwill. Determining the number of reporting unitsmeasure them at fair value. Gains and thelosses resulting from changes in fair value of a reporting unit requires us to make judgments and involvesare accounted for depending on the use of significant estimatesthe derivative and assumptions.whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. To receive hedge accounting treatment, all hedging relationships are formally documented at the inception of the hedge, and the hedges must be highly effective in offsetting changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions. We also make judgments and assumptions in allocating assets and liabilities to each of our reporting units. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are also unpredictable and inherently uncertain.

53


Therecord changes in the carrying amountintrinsic value of goodwill forthese cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the year ended January 3, 2016 were as follows:

 

 

MPD

 

 

PSD

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Goodwill as of December 28, 2014

 

$

33,860

 

 

$

31,836

 

 

$

65,696

 

Goodwill from merger with Spansion (1)

 

 

739,036

 

 

 

937,000

 

 

 

1,676,036

 

Measurement period adjustments

 

 

(2,850

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,850

)

Goodwill as of January 3, 2016

 

$

770,046

 

 

$

968,836

 

 

$

1,738,882

 

(1)

Refer Note 2 for further details.

OnConsolidated Balance Sheets, until the first day of our fourth quarter of fiscal 2015,forecasted transaction occurs. When the forecasted transaction occurs, we performed our annual goodwill impairment assessment usingreclassify the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first steprelated gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to the appropriate revenue or expense line of the quantitative goodwill impairment test isConsolidated Statements of Operations. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we will reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive loss to identify a potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination.  

We estimated the fair values of our reporting units using a combination of theother income and market approach.  These valuation approaches consider a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, forecasted financial information, growth rates, terminal or residual values, discount rates and comparable multiples from publicly traded companies(expense), net in our industry and require us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and the future profitabilityConsolidated Statements of our business.

The income approach utilizes estimates of discounted future cash flows. Key assumptions used in the market approach include the selection of appropriate benchmark companies and the selection of an appropriate market value multiple for each reporting unit based on a comparison of the reporting unit with the benchmark companies as of the impairment testing date.

In performing our 2015 assessment, we applied a weighting of 75% to the income approach and 25% to the market approach. GivenOperations at that the reporting units are transitioning out of a period of declining revenue and profit, we believe the income approach is a better indication of the going concern value of the reporting units as it better captures the expected improvement in revenue and profit. As such, we placed more weighing on the income approach.  Furthermore, as the market approach reflected general macroeconomic concerns that were evidenced in valuations for multiple publicly traded companies, the Company concluded this approach was not as relevant to the impairment calculation.

Based on our goodwill impairment testing, we determined that there was no impairment of our goodwill.  The fair value of our MPD reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 53% and the fair value of our PSD reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 9%.  As a result, if we applied a hypothetical 10% decrease to the fair value of each reporting unit, it would have resulted in the fair value of our PSD reporting unit being less than its carrying value. As an overall test of the reasonableness of estimated fair values of our two reporting units, we reconciled the combined fair value estimates of our reporting units to our market capitalization as of the valuation date. The reconciliation confirmed that the fair values were relatively representative of the market views when applying a reasonable control premium to the market capitalization. However, any significant reductions in the actual amount of future cash flows realized by our reporting units, reductions in the value of market comparables, or reductions in our market capitalization could impact future estimates of the fair values of our reporting units. Such events could ultimately result in a material charge to our results of operations in future periods due to the potential for a write-down of the goodwill associated with our reporting units.

54


Based on our testing, we determined that there was a risk of our PSD reporting unit failing the first step of goodwill impairment test in future periods.  For this reporting unit, the underlying assumptions we used in assessing fair value include, but are not limited to, declines in our stock price or our peers’ stock prices, relatively small declines in the future performance and cash flows of the reporting unit or small changes in other key assumptions, such as revenue growth rates and discount rates. Specifically, the income approach valuation for PSD included the following assumptions for 2015:

Year Ended

January 3, 2016

Discount rate

9%

Long-term growth rate

4%

Tax rate

28%

Risk free rate

4%

Peer company beta

0.97

Our PSD reporting unit is highly sensitive to management’s plans for increasing sales and gross margins by expanding PSOC 3/4/5 and the Automotive business as well as the achievement of our cost reduction initiatives.  If the actual revenue growth and profitability improvements forecasted for the PSD reporting unit do not achieve the levels we estimated in assessing the fair value of the PSD reporting unit, the fair value of the PSD reporting unit may decline.  A future decline in the fair value of the PSD reporting unit may result in the recognition of an impairment charge to our earnings as a result of a write-down of the value of the goodwill associated with that reporting unit.

Our next annual evaluation of the goodwill by reporting unit will be performed on the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist.  Such indicators include, but are not limited to, challenging economic conditions, such as a decline in our operating results, an unfavorable industry or macroeconomic environment, a substantial decline in our stock price, or any other adverse change in market conditions.  Such conditions could have the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates we use to calculate the fair value of our reporting units, which could result in a decrease in fair value and require us to record goodwill impairment charges.

In fiscal 2014, we elected to perform a qualitative analysis for impairment on goodwill rather than to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. We assessed qualitative factors to determine whether it was necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. After assessing many qualitative factors pertinent to our Company we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. In assessing the qualitative factors, we considered the impact of these key factors: 1) change in the industry and competitive environment, 2) market capitalization, 3) stock price and 4) overall financial performance. Based on the results of the testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized in fiscal 2014.

In fiscal 2013, we elected to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Based on the results of the testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized in 2013.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Our financial assets and financial liabilities that require recognition under the guidance generally include available-for-sale investments, employee deferred compensation plan and foreign currency derivatives. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. As such, fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

·

Level 1 includes instruments for which quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Our financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include U.S. treasuries, money market funds, marketable equity securities and our employee deferred compensation plan assets with the exception of our stable value funds which are considered Level 2 instruments.

55


·

Level 2 includes instruments for which the valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets consist of certain marketable debt instruments for which values are determined using inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Our Level 2 instruments include certain U.S. government securities, commercial paper, corporate notes and bonds, assets held-for-sale and our employee deferred compensation plan liabilities and our stable value funds included in our deferred compensation plan assets.

time.

·

Level 3 includes valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model. Financial assets utilizing Level 3 inputs primarily include auction rate securities. We do not have any financial assets or liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs.

Cash Flow Hedges:

The Company enters into cash flow hedges to protect non-functional currency revenues, inventory purchases and certain other operational expenses against variability in cash flows due to foreign currency fluctuations. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts that were designated as cash flow hedges have maturities between three and ninetwelve months. All hedging relationships are formally documented, and the hedges are designed to offset changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions at the inception of the hedge. The Company recognizes derivative instruments from hedging activities as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures them at fair value on a monthly basis. The Company records changes in the intrinsic value of its cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, until the forecasted transaction occurs. Interest charges or “forward points” on the forward contracts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are recorded in other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. When the forecasted transaction occurs, the Company reclassifies the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue or costs, depending on the risk hedged. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income to other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time.

The Company evaluates hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge prospectively as well as retrospectively and records any ineffective portion of the hedge in other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.  

The Company enters into interest rate swaps to manage the variability in cash flow due to interest rate fluctuations. The Company evaluates hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge prospectively as well as retrospectively and records any ineffective portion of the hedge in other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of


Operations. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps that have been designated as hedging instruments will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Refer Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 for further details on cash flow and balance sheet hedges.

Stock-Based

Share-Based Compensation:

Under the fair value recognition provisions of the guidance, we recognize stock-basedthe Company recognizes share-based compensation netbased on the grant date fair value of an estimated forfeiture ratethe award and only recognize compensation cost for those shares expected to vestis recognized over the requisite service period, ofwhich is usually the awards.vesting period. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including measurement of the level of achievement of performance milestones, the expected life of the share-based payment awards and stock price volatility. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. Through fiscal 2016, we estimated the expected forfeiture rate and only recognized the expense for those shares expected to vest. Beginning fiscal 2017, with the adoption of ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting," the Company elected to recognize forfeitures as they occurred and adopted these changes using a modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative adjustment recorded to opening accumulative deficit. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-basedshare-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, our future stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded.

Employee Benefit Plans:

In connection with the Merger, we assumed the Spansion Innovates Group Cash Balance Plan (a defined benefit pension plan) in Japan. A defined benefit pension plan is accounted for on an actuarial basis, which requires the selection of various assumptions such as turnover rates, discount rates and other factors. The discount rate assumption is determined by comparing the projected benefit payments to the Japanese corporate bonds yield curve as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year. The benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation (PBO), which represents the actuarial present value of benefits expected to be paid upon retirement. This liability is recorded in other long termlong-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net periodic pension cost is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and includes service cost. Service cost represents the actuarial present value of participant benefits earned in the current year. Interest cost represents the time value of money associated with the passage of time on the PBO. Gains or losses resulting from a change in the PBO if actual results differ from actuarial assumptions will be accumulated and amortized over the future life of the plan participants if they exceed 10% of the PBO, being the corridor amount. If the amount of a net gain or loss does not exceed the corridor amount, it will be recorded to other comprehensive income (loss). See Note 1718 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details of the pension plans.

56



Accounting for Income Taxes:

Our global operations involve manufacturing, research


On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and development and selling activities. Profits from non-U.S. activities are subjectJobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to local country taxesthe Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not subjectlimited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the repeal of corporate AMT for tax years, the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax until repatriatedsystem to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings. We have computed our provision for income taxes in accordance with the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing and as a result have recorded a tax benefit of $8.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. The provisional amount related to the U.S. United States income tax has not been provided on a portionremeasurement of earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the extent that such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. We record a valuation allowance to reduce ourcertain deferred tax assetsliabilities, based on the rates at which they are expected to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We consider historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. Should we determine that we would be able to realize deferred tax assetsreverse in the future, was a tax benefit of $3.0 million. The provisional amount related to the repeal of corporate AMT was a tax benefit of $5.6 million as the prior year AMT credit will be refunded over 2018 - 2021. Based on the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing, the Company determined a provisional estimate of the impact of the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulative foreign subsidiary earnings. The Company estimates that the transition tax will result in excessthe utilization of $46.0 million of net operating loss carryforwards against which the Company maintains a corresponding valuation allowance. As a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2017, which resulted in a decrease of the net recorded amount, we would record an adjustment to the deferred tax assetbalance and corresponding valuation allowance. This adjustment would increase income in the period such determination is made.

The calculationallowance balance of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in$158.7 million.




On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued to address the application of complex globalU.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax regulations. We recognizeeffects of the Act. In accordance with SAB 118, we have determined that there is no additional current tax expense required to be recorded in connection with the transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings and a reasonable estimate at December 31, 2017 as we believe we have sufficient tax attributes such as NOL and tax credits to offset any tax imposed on this income. Additional work is necessary for a more detailed analysis of our historical foreign earnings as well as potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extentcorrelative adjustments. Any subsequent adjustment to which, additional taxesthese amounts will be due. If payment of these amounts ultimately provesrecorded to be unnecessary, the reversalcurrent tax expense upon completion of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized inanalysis during the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary. If the estimatesubsequent quarters of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate tax assessment, a further charge to expense would result.

2018.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risks

Our investment portfolio consists of a variety of financial instruments that expose us to interest rate risk, including, but not limited to, money market funds, certificate of deposit and corporate securities. These investments are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our balance sheets at fair market value with their related unrealized gain or loss reflected as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Due to the relatively short-term nature of our investment portfolio, we do not believe that an immediate 10% increase in interest rates would have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio. Since
Our debt obligations consist of a variety of financial instruments that expose us to interest rate risk, including, but not limited to the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (expiring March 2020) and the Term Loan (expiring July 2021). Interest on our Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan is at a variable rate. The interest rate on each of these instruments is tied to short term interest rate benchmarks including the Prime Rate and LIBOR.
In December 2017, we believeentered into fixed-for-floating interest rate forward swap agreements (expiring July 2021) with two counterparties starting from April 2018, to swap variable interest payments on our debt for fixed interest payments; these agreements will expire on July 2021. The objective of the swap was to effectively fix the interest rate at current levels without having to refinance the outstanding term loan, thereby avoiding the incurrence of transaction costs. The interest rate on the variable debt will continue to float until it becomes fixed in April 2018. As of December 31, 2017, these swaps were not designated as hedging instruments. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate notional amount of these interest rate swaps was $300 million. The gross asset and liability at fair value as well as the net impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations was immaterial. Subsequent to year-end, on January 3, 2018, we have evaluated the ability to liquidate this portfolio, we do not expecthedge effectiveness of the interest rate swaps and have designated these swaps as hedging instruments. Upon designation as hedge instruments, future changes in fair value of these swaps will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

A one hundred basis point change in the contractual interest rates would change our interest expense for the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan by approximately $3.0 million annually.
Our long-term operating results orand cash flows tomay be materially affected to anya significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.

rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We operate and sell products in various global markets generating revenue primarily in USD and purchase capital equipment using foreignYen and incur costs denominated in many currencies including USD, Yen, Euro, Renminbi, Thai Baht, Philippine Peso, Indian Rupee, Malaysian Ringgit and several other non-material currencies but predominantly the U.S. dollar. Pursuant to our Merger, weWe are exposed to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates in all these non-U.S. locations.
Example of our foreign currency transactions including:
sales of our products to Japanese distributors are denominated in U.S. dollars, Japanese yen and Euros;
some of our manufacturing costs are denominated in Japanese yen, and other foreign currencies such as the Thai Baht, Philippine Peso and Malaysian Ringgit; and


some fixed asset purchases and sales are exposed todenominated in other foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

For example,

·

sales of our products to Fujitsu are denominated in U.S. dollars, Japanese yen and Euro;

currencies.

·

some of our manufacturing costs are denominated in Japanese yen, and other foreign currencies such as the Thai baht and Malaysian ringgit;

·

some of our operating expenses are denominated in Japanese yen and

·

some fixed asset purchases and sales are denominated in other foreign currencies.

Consequently, movements in exchange rates could cause our net salesrevenues and our expenses to fluctuate, affecting our profitability and cash flows. We use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce our foreign exchange exposure on our foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. We also hedge a percentage of our forecasted revenue and expenses denominated in Japanese yen with foreign currency forward contracts. The objective of these contracts is to mitigate impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements to our operating results on a short termshort-term basis. We do not use these contracts for speculative or trading purposes.

57


We recognize derivative instruments from hedging activities as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value are accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. To receive hedge accounting treatment, all hedging relationships are formally documented at the inception of the hedge, and the hedges must be highly effective in offsetting changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions. We record changes in the intrinsic value of these cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, until the forecasted transaction occurs. When the forecasted transaction occurs, we reclassify the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to the appropriate revenue or expense line of the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we will reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive loss to other income (expense), net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time.

We evaluate hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge prospectively as well as retrospectively and record any ineffective portion of the hedging instruments in other income (expense), net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We analyzed our foreign currency exposure, including our hedging strategies, to identify assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies. For those assets and liabilities, we evaluated the effects of a 10% shift in exchange rates between those currencies and the U.S. dollar. We have determined that there would be an immaterial effect on our results of operations from such a shift. Please see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 for details on the contracts.

58





ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Page

60



61



62



63



64



66



108



Supplemental Financial Data - Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

114

117


59





CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands, except

per-share amounts)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

226,690

 

 

$

103,736

 

Short-term investments

 

 

871

 

 

 

15,076

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

292,736

 

 

 

75,984

 

Inventories

 

 

243,595

 

 

 

88,227

 

Other current assets

 

 

86,880

 

 

 

29,288

 

Total current assets

 

 

850,772

 

 

 

312,311

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

425,003

 

 

 

237,763

 

Goodwill

 

 

1,738,882

 

 

 

65,696

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

789,195

 

 

 

33,918

 

Other long-term assets

 

 

200,409

 

 

 

93,593

 

Total assets

 

$

4,004,261

 

 

$

743,281

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

143,383

 

 

$

42,678

 

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

 

 

54,850

 

 

 

35,182

 

Deferred margin on sales to distributors

 

 

73,370

 

 

 

75,569

 

Dividends payable

 

 

36,520

 

 

 

17,931

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

3,262

 

 

 

2,710

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

14,606

 

 

 

6,143

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

202,405

 

 

 

94,619

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

528,396

 

 

 

274,832

 

Deferred income taxes and other tax liabilities

 

 

51,737

 

 

 

18,784

 

Revolving credit facility and long-term debt

 

 

673,659

 

 

 

237,107

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

37,784

 

 

 

10,693

 

Total liabilities

 

 

1,291,576

 

 

 

541,416

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 650,000 and 650,000 shares authorized; 481,912 and

   306,167 shares issued; 332,276 and 163,013 shares outstanding at January 3, 2016

   and December 28, 2014, respectively

 

 

4,637

 

 

 

3,039

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

 

5,623,411

 

 

 

2,675,170

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(227

)

 

 

(46

)

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(758,780

)

 

 

(379,913

)

Stockholders’ equity before treasury stock

 

 

4,869,041

 

 

 

2,298,250

 

Less: shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost; 149,636 and 143,154 shares

   at January 3, 2016 and  December 28, 2014, respectively

 

 

(2,148,193

)

 

 

(2,090,493

)

Total Cypress stockholders’ equity

 

 

2,720,848

 

 

 

207,757

 

Non-controlling interest

 

 

(8,163

)

 

 

(5,892

)

Total equity

 

 

2,712,685

 

 

 

201,865

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

4,004,261

 

 

$

743,281

 

 December 31,
2017
 January 1,
2017
ASSETS(In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$151,596
 $120,172
Accounts receivable, net295,991
 333,037
Inventories272,127
 287,776
Assets held for sale
 30,796
Other current assets103,637
 122,162
Total current assets823,351
 893,943
Property, plant and equipment, net289,554
 297,266
Goodwill1,439,472
 1,439,472
Intangible assets, net715,120
 904,561
Equity method investments122,514
 188,687
Other long-term assets147,039
 147,942
Total assets3,537,050
 3,871,871
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
  
Current liabilities: 
  
Accounts payable213,101
 241,424
Accrued compensation and employee benefits79,275
 60,552
Price adjustments and other distributor related reserves173,592
 154,525
Dividends payable38,741
 35,506
Current portion of long-term debt27,303
 30,152
Other current liabilities143,485
 180,298
Total current liabilities675,497
 702,457
Deferred income taxes and other tax liabilities52,006
 44,934
Credit facility and long-term debt956,513
 1,194,979
Other long-term liabilities35,442
 36,749
Total liabilities1,719,458
 1,979,119
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)
 
Stockholder's Equity: 
  
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $.01 par value, 650,000 and 650,000 shares authorized; 525,719 and 497,055 shares issued; 352,220 and 323,583 shares outstanding at December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, respectively4,936
 4,737
Additional paid-in-capital5,659,612
 5,659,644
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,362) (8,811)
Accumulated deficit(1,511,706) (1,428,441)
Stockholders’ equity before treasury stock4,151,480
 4,227,129
Less: shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost; 173,498 and 173,472 shares at December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, respectively(2,334,944) (2,335,301)
Total Cypress stockholders’ equity1,816,536
 1,891,828
Non-controlling interest1,056
 924
Total equity1,817,592
 1,892,752
Total liabilities and equity$3,537,050
 $3,871,871
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

60




CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Revenues

 

$

1,607,853

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

$

722,693

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

1,207,850

 

 

 

361,820

 

 

 

384,121

 

Research and development

 

 

281,391

 

 

 

164,560

 

 

 

190,906

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

323,570

 

 

 

170,741

 

 

 

182,671

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

 

 

108,335

 

 

 

6,683

 

 

 

7,833

 

Restructuring costs (benefit)

 

 

90,084

 

 

 

(1,180

)

 

 

15,357

 

Gain on divestiture of TrueTouch® Mobile business

 

 

(66,472

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses, net

 

 

1,944,758

 

 

 

702,624

 

 

 

780,888

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

(336,905

)

 

 

22,873

 

 

 

(58,195

)

Interest expense

 

 

(16,356

)

 

 

(5,763

)

 

 

(8,112

)

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(3,769

)

 

 

3,303

 

 

 

10,337

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest

 

 

(357,030

)

 

 

20,413

 

 

 

(55,970

)

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

 

(16,960

)

 

 

1,173

 

 

 

7,761

 

Equity in net loss of equity method investee

 

 

(7,148

)

 

 

(5,068

)

 

 

(1,878

)

Net Income (loss)

 

 

(381,138

)

 

 

16,518

 

 

 

(50,087

)

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest, net of taxes

 

 

2,271

 

 

 

1,418

 

 

 

1,845

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress

 

 

(378,867

)

 

 

17,936

 

 

 

(48,242

)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Cypress:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

Diluted

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

Cash dividends declared per share

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

 

$

0.44

 

Shares used in net income (loss) per share calculation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

159,031

 

 

 

148,558

 

Diluted

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

169,122

 

 

 

148,558

 


Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1,
2017
 January 3,
2016
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Revenues$2,327,771
 $1,923,108
 $1,607,853
Costs and expenses:     
Cost of revenues1,370,309
 1,235,540
 1,204,196
Research and development357,016
 331,175
 274,813
Selling, general and administrative303,651
 317,362
 320,227
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets195,304
 174,745
 108,335
Costs and settlement charges related to shareholder matter14,310
 
 
Impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets
 33,944
 
Impairment related to assets held for sale
 37,219
 
Goodwill impairment charge
 488,504
 
Restructuring costs9,088
 26,131
 90,084
(Gain) related to investment in Deca Technologies Inc.
 (112,774) 
(Gain) on divestiture of TrueTouch® Mobile business
 
 (66,472)
Total costs and expenses2,249,678
 2,531,846
 1,931,183
Operating income (loss)78,093
 (608,738) (323,330)
Interest expense(80,215) (55,192) (16,356)
Other income (expense), net4,268
 313
 (3,769)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest2,146
 (663,617) (343,455)
Income tax (provision)(11,157) (2,616) (16,960)
Share in net loss and impairment of equity method investees(71,772) (17,644) (7,148)
Net loss(80,783) (683,877) (367,563)
Net (gain) loss attributable to non-controlling interest, net of taxes(132) 643
 2,271
Net loss attributable to Cypress$(80,915) $(683,234) $(365,292)
Net loss per share attributable to Cypress: 
    
Basic$(0.24) $(2.14) $(1.21)
Diluted$(0.24) $(2.14) $(1.21)
Cash dividends declared per share$0.44
 $0.44
 $0.44
Shares used in net (loss) per share calculation:     
Basic333,451
 319,522
 302,036
Diluted333,451
 319,522
 302,036

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

61






CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(381,138

)

 

$

16,518

 

 

$

(50,087

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities

 

 

28

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

267

 

Reclassification of net realized (gains) losses on available-for-sale

   securities included in net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

885

 

Net unrecognized gain on the Defined Benefit Plan

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period

 

 

(1,651

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (gain) reclassified into earnings for revenue hedges

   (effective portion)

 

 

(1,678

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss reclassified into earnings for expense hedges

   (ineffective portion)

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss reclassified into earnings for expense hedges

   (effective portion)

 

 

3,014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges

 

 

(235

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive gain (loss)

 

 

(181

)

 

 

302

 

 

 

1,152

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(381,319

)

 

 

16,820

 

 

 

(48,935

)

Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

2,271

 

 

 

1,418

 

 

 

1,845

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cypress

 

$

(379,048

)

 

$

18,238

 

 

$

(47,090

)

 Twelve Months Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1,
2017
 January 3,
2016
 (In thousands)
Net loss(80,783) (683,877) (367,563)
Other comprehensive (loss) income: 
  
  
Net change in unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities
 
 28
Net unrecognized gain on defined benefit plan324
 (1,214) 26
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:
 
 
Net unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period511
 (5,186) (1,651)
Net loss reclassified into earnings for revenue hedges (effective portion)(4,634) 13,650
 (1,678)
Net loss reclassified into earnings for revenue hedges (ineffective portion)
 (173) 
Net loss reclassified into earnings from expense hedges (ineffective portion)
 
 80
Net loss (gain) reclassified into earnings for expense hedges (effective portion)10,586
 (15,661) 3,014
Provision for income tax662
 
 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges7,125
 (7,370) (235)
Other comprehensive gain (loss)7,449
 (8,584) (181)
Comprehensive income (loss)(73,334) (692,461) (367,744)
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest(132) 643
 2,271
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cypress$(73,466) $(691,818) $(365,473)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

62




CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional

Paid-In

 

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Interest

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balances at January 2, 2013

 

 

286,903

 

 

$

2,868

 

 

$

2,612,579

 

 

$

(444

)

 

$

(349,607

)

 

$

142,679

 

 

$

(2,085,570

)

 

$

(4,039

)

 

$

175,787

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Cypress

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(48,242

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(48,242

)

Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale

   investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

267

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

267

 

Issuance of common shares under employee

   stock plans

 

 

9,443

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

43,249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,344

 

Withholding of common shares for tax

   obligations on vested restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

453

 

 

 

(4,663

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,663

)

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,447

 

Dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(65,822

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(65,822

)

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(435

)

 

 

(435

)

Balances at December 29, 2013

 

 

296,346

 

 

$

2,963

 

 

$

2,665,453

 

 

$

(177

)

 

$

(397,849

)

 

$

143,132

 

 

$

(2,090,233

)

 

$

(4,474

)

 

$

175,683

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Cypress

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,936

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,936

 

Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale

   investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

Yield enhancement structured agreements, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

318

 

Issuance of common shares under employee

   stock plans

 

 

9,821

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

33,071

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,147

 

Withholding of common shares for tax

   obligations on vested restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

(260

)

 

 

 

 

 

(260

)

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,663

 

Dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(70,335

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(70,335

)

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,418

)

 

 

(1,418

)

Balances at December 28, 2014

 

 

306,167

 

 

$

3,039

 

 

$

2,675,170

 

 

$

(46

)

 

$

(379,913

)

 

 

143,154

 

 

$

(2,090,493

)

 

$

(5,892

)

 

$

201,865

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Cypress

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(378,867

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(378,867

)

Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale

   investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(181

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(181

)

Changes in employee deferred compensation

   plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(227

)

 

 

 

 

 

(227

)

Yield enhancement structured agreements, net

 

 

 

 

 

(96

)

 

 

(9,118

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,214

)

Assumption of stock options and awards

   related to Spansion Merger

 

 

163,932

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,666,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,666,865

 

Assumption of 2.00% Senior Exchangeable

   Notes related to Spansion Merger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

287,362

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

287,362

 

Issuance of common shares under employee

   stock plans

 

 

11,813

 

 

 

1,694

 

 

 

53,863

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,557

 

Withholding of common shares for tax

   obligations on vested restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

234

 

 

 

(2,455

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,455

)

Repurchase of common shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,248

 

 

 

(55,018

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55,018

)

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95,814

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95,814

 

Dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(146,545

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(146,545

)

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,271

)

 

 

(2,271

)

Balances at January 3, 2016

 

 

481,912

 

 

$

4,637

 

 

$

5,623,411

 

 

$

(227

)

 

$

(758,780

)

 

 

149,636

 

 

$

(2,148,193

)

 

$

(8,163

)

 

$

2,712,685

 


 Common Stock Additional
Paid-In
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
 Accumulated Treasury Stock Noncontrolling Total
 Shares Amount Capital Income (Loss) Deficit Shares Amount Interest Equity
 (in thousands, except share amounts)
Balances at December 28, 2014306,167 $3,039
 $2,675,170
 $(46) $(379,913) 143,154
 $(2,090,493) $(5,892) $201,865
Net loss attributable to Cypress
 
 
 
 (365,292) 
 
 
 (365,292)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 (181) 
 
 
 
 (181)
Changes in employee deferred compensation plan assets
 
 
 
 
 
 (227) 
 (227)
Yield enhancement structured agreements, net
 (96) (9,118) 
 
 1,000
 
 
 (9,214)
Assumption of stock options and awards related to Spansion Merger163,932
 
 2,666,865
 
 
 
 
 
 2,666,865
Assumption of 2.00% Spansion Exchangeable Notes related to Spansion Merger
 
 287,362
 
 
 
 
 
 287,362
Issuance of common shares under employee stock plans11,813
 1,694
 53,863
 
 
 
 
 
 55,557
Withholding of common shares for tax obligations on vested restricted shares
 
 
 
 
 234
 (2,455) 
 (2,455)
Repurchase of common shares
 
 
 
 
 5,248
 (55,018) 
 (55,018)
Stock-based compensation
 
 85,977
 
 
 
 
 
 85,977
Dividends
 
 (146,545) 
 
 
 
 
 (146,545)
Noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,271) (2,271)
Balances at January 3, 2016481,912
 $4,637

$5,613,574

$(227)
$(745,205)
149,636


$(2,148,193)
$(8,163)
$2,716,423

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Net loss attributable to Cypress
 
 
 
 (683,234) 
 
 
 (683,234)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 (7,344) (2)  
 
 
 (7,346)
Unrealized gain (loss) on defined benefit pension plan
 
 
 (1,240) 
 
 
 
 (1,240)
Changes in employee deferred compensation plan assets
 
 
 
 
 
 (94) 
 (94)
Issuance of common shares under employee stock plans15,143
 100
 48,166
 
 
 
 
 
 48,266
Withholding of common shares for tax obligations on vested restricted shares
 
 
 
 
 887
 (11,320) 
 (11,320)
Repurchase of common shares
 
 
 
 
 22,949
 (175,694) 
 (175,694)
Stock-based compensation
 
 98,781
 
 
 
 
 
 98,781
Issuance of 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes
 
 47,686
 
 
 
 
 
 47,686
Purchase of capped calls related to 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes
 
 (8,165) 
 
 
 
 
 (8,165)
Dividends
 
 (140,398) 
 
 
 
 
 (140,398)
Deconsolidation of Deca
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6,838
 6,838
Noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,249
 2,249
January 1, 2017497,055
 4,737
 5,659,644
 (8,811) (1,428,441) 173,472
 (2,335,301) 924
 $1,892,752

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Net loss attributable to Cypress
 
 
 
 (80,915) 
 
 
 (80,915)


Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale and other investments
 
 
 7,125
 
 
 
 
 7,125
Unrealized gain (loss) on defined benefit pension plan
 
 
 324
 
 


 
 324
Changes in employee deferred compensation plan assets
 
 
 
 
 
 477
 
 477
Adoption of ASU 2016-09  
 2,350
 
 (2,350)   
 
 
Issuance of common shares under employee stock plans11,316
 26
 47,245
 
 
 
 
 
 47,271
Issuance of common shares upon conversion of 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes17,348
 173
 283,634
 
 
 27
 
 
 283,807
Withholding of common shares for tax obligations on vested restricted shares
 
 
 
 
 
 (120) 
 (120)
Stock-based compensation
 
 90,261
 
 
 
 
 
 90,261
Issuance of 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes
 
 15,028
 
 
 
 
 
 15,028
Extinguishment of 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes
 
 (290,591) 
 
 
 
 
 (290,591)
Dividends
 
 (147,959) 
 
 
 
 
 (147,959)
Noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 132
 132
Balances at December 31, 2017525,719
 $4,936
 $5,659,612
 $(1,362) $(1,511,706) 173,498
 $(2,334,944) $1,056
 $1,817,592
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

63




CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(381,138

)

 

$

16,518

 

 

$

(50,087

)

Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to net cash provided by operating

   activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

93,527

 

 

 

50,170

 

 

 

73,020

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

241,584

 

 

 

46,734

 

 

 

48,393

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

8,581

 

 

 

(1,180

)

 

 

15,357

 

(Gain) loss on sale or retirement of property and equipment, net

 

 

424

 

 

 

(196

)

 

 

 

Gain on divestiture of TrueTouch® Mobile business

 

 

(66,472

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in loss of equity method investee

 

 

7,148

 

 

 

5,068

 

 

 

1,878

 

Accretion of interest expense on convertible notes

 

 

2,537

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss from trading securities

 

 

3,191

 

 

 

1,667

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

3,042

 

 

 

272

 

 

 

(718

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of an

   acquisition and divestiture:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(117,371

)

 

 

5,099

 

 

 

1,837

 

Inventories

 

 

288,264

 

 

 

9,140

 

 

 

29,419

 

Other current and long-term assets

 

 

(5,977

)

 

 

10,560

 

 

 

8,354

 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

 

 

(54,294

)

 

 

(13,126

)

 

 

(51,270

)

Deferred margin on sales to distributors

 

 

(14,245

)

 

 

(27,390

)

 

 

(8,615

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

8,801

 

 

 

103,336

 

 

 

67,568

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments

 

 

800

 

 

 

16,556

 

 

 

58,684

 

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments

 

 

16,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,730

 

Purchases of marketable securities

 

 

(1,530

)

 

 

(23,425

)

 

 

(23,137

)

Business acquisition, net of cash acquired

 

 

(105,130

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(47,206

)

 

 

(20,947

)

 

 

(36,627

)

Proceeds from divestiture

 

 

88,635

 

 

 

3,240

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of property and equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,661

 

Cash paid for cost and equity method investments

 

 

(34,126

)

 

 

(18,400

)

 

 

(11,961

)

Contributions to (distributions from) deferred compensation plan

 

 

1,511

 

 

 

(1,283

)

 

 

(1,247

)

Proceeds from sales of equity investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,158

 

Other

 

 

1,375

 

 

 

2,103

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

(79,087

)

 

 

(42,156

)

 

 

261

 

64


 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1,
2017
 January 3,
2016
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:   
  
Net loss$(80,783) $(683,877) $(367,563)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
Stock-based compensation expenses91,581
 98,513
 83,690
Depreciation and amortization264,905
 265,922
 241,584
Impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets
 33,944
 
Impairment related to assets held for sale
 37,219
 
Impairment of goodwill
 488,504
 
(Gain) on divestitures(1,245) 
 (66,472)
(Gain) related to investment in Deca Technologies
 (112,774) 
(Gain) loss on sale or retirement of property and equipment, net(1,165) 7,375
 424
Share in net loss and impairment of equity method investees71,772
 17,644
 7,148
Accretion of interest expense on Senior Exchangeable Notes and amortization of debt and financing costs on other debt
21,091
 13,139
 2,537
Loss on trading securities
 598
 3,191
Loss on extinguishment of debt7,246
 
 
Restructuring and other costs8,997
 27,235
 11,623
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestiture:     
Accounts receivable37,046
 (41,022) (117,371)
Inventories14,327
 (33,677) 288,264
Other current and long-term assets9,629
 (12,225) (5,977)
Price adjustments and other distributor related reserves19,067
 100,389
 31,705
Accounts payable and other liabilities(58,981) 79,476
 (89,737)
Deferred margin on sales to distributors
 (68,964) (14,245)
Net cash provided by operating activities403,487
 217,419
 8,801
Cash flows from investing activities: 
  
  
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
 (550,000) (105,130)
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments
 40,000
 800
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments
 45,904
 16,584
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
 (80,202) (1,530)
Contributions, net of distributions to deferred compensation plan
2,562
 (1,857) 1,511
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment(54,284) (57,398) (47,206)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment2,340
 
 
Investment in Deca Technologies Inc.
 17,627
 
Cash paid for equity and cost method investments(9,285) (27,149) (34,126)
Proceeds from divestitures45,500
 
 88,635
Other(1,262) (364) 1,375
Net cash used in investing activities(14,429) (613,439) (79,087)


CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase of treasury stock

 

 

(55,018

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common shares under employee stock plans

 

 

52,857

 

 

 

31,755

 

 

 

38,681

 

Yield enhancement structured agreements settled in cash, net

 

 

387

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

 

Yield enhancement structured agreements settled in common stock,

   net

 

 

(9,601

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments of dividends

 

 

(127,995

)

 

 

(69,248

)

 

 

(64,819

)

Proceeds from settlement of capped calls

 

 

25,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of equipment leases, loans and others

 

 

(9,420

)

 

 

(6,278

)

 

 

(8,880

)

Borrowings under revolving credit facility and line of credit

 

 

537,000

 

 

 

264,000

 

 

 

140,000

 

Borrowings under Term Loan A

 

 

97,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayments of revolving credit facility and line of credit loan

 

 

(315,000

)

 

 

(264,000

)

 

 

(145,000

)

Financing costs

 

 

(2,491

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,276

)

Repayments of other financing agreements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,140

)

Proceeds from sale of shares to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,411

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

193,240

 

 

 

(43,453

)

 

 

(45,023

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

122,954

 

 

 

17,727

 

 

 

22,806

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

 

103,736

 

 

 

86,009

 

 

 

63,203

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

226,690

 

 

$

103,736

 

 

$

86,009

 

Supplemental disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends payable

 

$

36,549

 

 

$

17,931

 

 

$

16,850

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

8,736

 

 

$

4,598

 

 

$

6,921

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

9,670

 

 

$

5,774

 

 

$

4,825

 

Unpaid purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

$

6,663

 

 

$

1,688

 

 

$

 

 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1,
2017
 January 3,
2016
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities: 
  
  
Repurchase of common stock
 (175,694) (55,018)
Proceeds from employee stock-based awards47,153
 43,850
 52,857
Yield enhancement structured agreements settled in cash, net
 
 387
Yield enhancement structured agreements settled in stock, net
 
 (9,601)
Payments of cash dividends(144,749) (141,410) (127,995)
Purchase of capped calls
 (8,165) 
Proceeds from settlement of capped calls
 
 25,293
Repayment of equipment leases, loans and other(112) (11,061) (9,420)
Borrowings under senior secured revolving credit facility190,000
 195,000
 537,000
Borrowings under Term Loans91,250
 450,000
 97,228
Repayments of senior secured revolving credit facility(432,000) (312,000) (315,000)
Repayment of Term Loans(118,701) (10,625) 
Financing costs related to debt(12,475) (27,893) (2,491)
Payment for extinguishment of 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes(128,000) 
 
Proceeds from issuance of Exchangeable Notes
150,000
 287,500
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(357,634) 289,502
 193,240
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents31,424
 (106,518) 122,954
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year120,172
 226,690
 103,736
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year151,596
 120,172
 226,690
Supplemental disclosures: 
  
  
Dividends payable$38,741
 $35,506
 $36,549
Cash paid for income taxes6,576
 8,288
 8,736
Cash paid for interest53,131
 32,625
 9,670
Unpaid purchases of property, plant and equipment14,291
 3,960
 6,663
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

65





CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Description of Business


Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress”("Cypress" or the “Company”"Company") designs, develops, manufactures and markets high-performance, high quality, mixed-signal, programmablesells advanced embedded system solutions that providefor automotive, industrial, home automation and appliances, consumer electronics and medical products. Cypress' microcontrollers, analog integrated circles ("ICs"), wireless and wired connectivity solutions and memories help engineers design differentiated products and help them with speed to market. Cypress is committed to providing customers with rapid time-to-marketsupport and exceptional system value. The Company’s offerings include the NOR flash memories, F-RAMTM and SRAM, TraveoTM microcontrollers, the industry’s only PSoC® programmable system-on-chip solutions, analog and PMIC Power Management ICs, Capsense® capacitive touch-sensing controllers, and Wireless BLE Bluetooth Low-Energy and universal serial bus (“USB”) connectivity solutions. The Company serves numerous markets including industrial, mobile handsets, consumer, computation, data communications, automotive, and military markets.

The Company’s operations outside of the United States include its assembly and test plants in Malaysia and the Philippines, and sales offices and design centers located in various parts of the world.

engineering resources. 


On March 12, 2015, the Company completed the merger (“Spansion Merger”) with Spansion Inc. ("Spansion"(“Spansion”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, as of December 1, 2014, (the "Merger Agreement"), for a total consideration of approximately $2.8 billion. In accordance

On July 5, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of certain assets primarily related to the Internet of Things business ("IoT business") of Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement with the termsBroadcom, dated April 28, 2016, for a total consideration of approximately $550 million.

On July 29, 2016, Deca Technologies Inc. ("Deca"), our majority-owned subsidiary, entered into a share purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), whereby certain third-party investors purchased 41.1% of the Merger Agreement, Spansion shareholders received 2.457 Cypress shares outstanding at the said date for each Spansion share they owned. The shareholdersan aggregate consideration of each company initially owned approximately 50%$111.4 million. Concurrently, Deca repurchased certain of its preferred shares from the post-merger company. The MergerCompany. As a result of these transactions, the Company has been accounted for underchanged the acquisition method of accounting for its investment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Topic 805, Business Combinations, with Cypress treated asDeca from consolidation to the accounting acquirer. See Note 2equity method of accounting.

The comparability of results for a detailed discussion of the Merger with Spansion. 

periods presented is significantly impacted by these transactions.


Basis of Preparation


The Company reports on a fiscal-year basis. The Company ends its quarters on the Sunday closest to the end of the applicable calendar quarter, except in a 53-week fiscal year, in which case the additional week falls into the fourth quarter of that fiscal year. Fiscal 2017 ended on December 31, 2017, fiscal 2016 ended on January 1, 2017 and fiscal 2015 ended on January 3, 2016. Fiscal years 2017 and 2016 Fiscal 2014 ended on December 28, 2014 and fiscal 2013 ended on December 29, 2013.each contained 52 weeks. Fiscal 2015 contained 53 weeks. Fiscal years 2014 and 2013 each contained 52 weeks.   The additional week in 2015 did not materially affect the Company's results of operations or financial position.


The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("(“U.S. GAAP"GAAP”) and include the accounts of Cypress and all of its subsidiaries. All significant inter-companyintercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The following reclassifications have been made in


Certain balances included on the presentation of Cypress’s Consolidated Balance Sheet asand in the Consolidated Statement of December 28, 2014Cash Flows for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year classification:

period presentation.

·$6.1 million reclassified from other current liabilities to current portion of long-term debt,


·$10.1 million reclassified from other long-term liabilities to revolving credit facility and long-term debt, and

·$19.6 million reclassified from deferred margin on sales to distributors to other current liabilities.

During fiscal 2014, the Company recorded out-of-period correcting adjustments to write off certain manufacturing and subcontractor costs that were capitalized within other current assets in previous periods. These corrections resulted in a decrease of net income of $2.6 million for the twelve months ended December 28, 2014. The Company recorded these corrections in the aggregate totaling $2.6 million in cost of revenues in the twelve months ended December 28, 2014. Management assessed the impact of these errors and concluded that the amounts were not material, either individually or in the aggregate, to any prior periods.

66


Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value due to the relatively short maturity of these items. See Note 5 for a detailed discussion of fair value measurements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents


Highly liquid investments with original or remaining maturities of ninety days or less at the date of purchase are considered cash equivalents.




Investments


All of the Company’s investments in equity securities in publicly traded companies are classified as trading securities. All of the Company’s investments in debt securities are classified as available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale debt securities with maturities greater than twelve months are classified as short-term when they are intended for use in current operations. Investments in available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” inon the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company also has minority equity investments in privately-held companies. Minority equity investments in which the Company’s ownership interest is less than 20% are carried at cost less any other than temporary impairment write-downs. Minority equity investments in which the Company’s ownership interest is 20% or greater are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company is required to record its interest in the investee's reported net income or loss(loss) for each reporting period. None of theThe Company’s equity investments are a variable interest entity. The Company’s minority equitymethod investments are included in “Other assets” in“Equity Method Investments” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


The Company monitors its investments for impairment periodically and records appropriate reductions in carrying values when the declines are determined to be other-than-temporary. See Note 5

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash equivalents, debt investments, interest rate swap obligations, trade accounts receivable and the capped calls. The Company’s investment policy requires cash investments to be placed with high-credit quality institutions and limits the amount of credit risk from any one issuer. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition whenever deemed necessary and generally does not require collateral. The Company mitigates its exposure to credit risk to the extent that its counterparties for a detailed discussionhedging transactions may be unable to meet the terms of the impairment losses recorded ontransactions. The Company mitigates this risk by limiting its counterparties to major financial institutions.

Outstanding accounts receivable from one of the Company’s investments.

distributors, accounted for 28% of the consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017. Outstanding accounts receivable from one of the Company's distributors, accounted for 24% of the consolidated accounts receivable as of January 1, 2017.


Revenue generated through two of Company's distributors, accounted for 20% and 13%, respectively, of Company's consolidated revenues for fiscal 2017.

Revenue generated through one of the Company’s distributors accounted for 23% of the consolidated revenues for fiscal 2016.

Revenue generated through two of the Company’s distributors, accounted for 25% and 10% respectively, of the consolidated revenues for fiscal 2015.

Inventories


Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Market is based on estimated net realizable value. The Company writes down its inventories which have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or net realizable value based upon assumptions about demand forecasts, product life cycle status, product development plans and current sales levels. Inventory reserves are not relieved until the related inventory has been sold or scrapped.


Long-Lived Assets


Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements and leasehold interests are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining term of the lease. Estimated useful lives are as follows:



Equipment

Equipment

3 to 10 years

Buildings and leasehold improvements

5 to 20 years

Furniture and fixtures

3 to 7 years

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could result in an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of assets, significant negative industry or economic trends, and a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time. Impairment is recognized based on the difference between the estimated fair value of the asset and its carrying value. Estimated fair value is generally measured based on quoted market prices, if available, appraisals or discounted cash flow analyses.

67


analysis.


Assets Held for Sale

The Company considers properties to be assets held for sale when management approves and commits to a plan to dispose of a property or group of properties. Assets held for sale are recorded initially at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Upon designation as an asset held for sale, the Company stops recording depreciation expense on such assets. Costs to sell a disposal group include incremental direct costs to transact the sale and represent the costs that result directly from and are essential to a sale transaction that would not have been incurred by the entity had the decision to sell not been made.

The properties that are held for sale prior to the sale date are classified as held for sale and are presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet. See Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets


Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable.


The Company assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter of our fiscal year and if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, on an interim basis. In accordance with ASU 2011-08,2011-8, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, qualitative factors canmay be assessed to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test for goodwill impairment. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.


Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment as discussed above. See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.


Acquisition related In-process Research and Development

Acquisition-related in-process research and development represents the fair value of incomplete research and development projects that have not reached technological feasibility as of the date of acquisition. Initially, these assets are not subject to amortization. The incomplete projects are reviewed each quarter for impairment related to cancellation, change in business plans as well as completion. Assets related to projects that have been completed are transferred to developed technology, which are subject to amortization.



Convertible debt

In accounting for each series of Senior Exchangeable Notes at issuance, the Company separated the Notes into debt and equity components according to accounting standards codification ("ASC") 470-20 for convertible debt instruments that may be fully or partially settled in cash upon conversion. The carrying amount of the debt component, which approximates its fair value, was estimated by using an interest rate for non-convertible debt, with terms similar to the Notes. The excess of the principal amount of the Notes over the fair value of the debt component was recorded as a debt discount and a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. The debt discount is accreted to the carrying value of the Notes over their term as interest expense using the effective interest method. In accounting for the transaction costs incurred relating to issuance of the Notes, the Company allocated the costs of the offering in proportion to the fair value of the debt and equity recognized in accordance with the accounting standards. The transaction costs allocated to the debt are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes.

The fair value of debt immediately prior to its derecognition is calculated based on the remaining expected life of the debt instrument and an updated current non-convertible debt rate assumption. The gain or loss on extinguishment equaling the difference between the calculated fair value of the debt immediately prior to its derecognition and the carrying amount of the debt components, including the remaining unamortized debt discount, is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The remainder of the consideration relates to the reacquisition of the equity component and as an adjustment to additional paid-in-capital.

In accounting for the cost of the capped call transaction entered in connection with the issuance of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, the Company included the cost as a net reduction to additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheet, in accordance with the guidance in ASC 815-40 Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity.  See Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Revenue Recognition


The Company generates revenues by selling products to distributors, various types of manufacturers including original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and electronic manufacturing service providers (“EMSs”). The Company recognizes revenues on sales to OEMs and EMSs upon shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, title has transferred, collection of resulting receivables is reasonably assured, there are no customer acceptance requirements, and there are no significant remaining obligations.


Sales to certain distributors are made under agreements which provide the distributors with price protection, stock rotation and other allowances under certain circumstances. When theThe Company determines that the uncertainties exist for the rights given to these distributors, revenues and costs related to distributortypically recognizes revenue from sales are deferred untilof its products are sold by the distributors to the end customers. In those circumstances, revenues are recognized upon receiving notification from the distributors that products have been sold to the end customers. In these cases, at the time of shipment to distributors the Company records a trade receivableupon shipment. An allowance for the sellingestimated distributor credits covering price since thereadjustments is a legally enforceable right to receive payment, relieves inventory for the value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributors,recorded based on historical experience rates as well as economic conditions and defers the related margin and price adjustment as deferred income on sales to distributors on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.contractual terms. Any effects of change in estimates related to distributor price adjustments are recorded as a reductionan adjustment to deferred income at the time the distributors sell the products to the end customers and the distributor submits a valid claim for the price adjustment.

revenue.


The Company hashad historically recognized a significant portion of revenue through distributors at the time the distributor resold the product to its end customer (also referred to as the sell-through basis of revenue recognition) given the difficulty in estimating the ultimate price of these product shipments and amount of potential returns.. The Company continuously reassesses its ability to reliably estimate the ultimate price of these products and, over the past several years, has made investments in its systems and processprocesses around theits distribution channel to improve the quality of the information it receives from its distributors. Given these ongoing investments, and based on the financial framework used for estimating potential price adjustments, beginningin the fourth quarter of 2014 the Company concluded that it was able to reasonably estimate returns and pricing concessionsbegan recognizing revenue on certain product families and with certain distributors and recognized revenue at the time it shipped these specific products to the identified distributors, less(less its estimate of future price adjustments and returns. As a resultreturns) upon shipment to the distributors (also referred to as the sell-in basis of this change,revenue recognition).

During fiscal 2016, the Company recognized an incremental $12.3$59.2 million of incremental revenue during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The impact offrom this change in revenue recognition, which resulted in an increasea reduction of $6.2the Company's net loss of $19.5 million to net income attributable to Cypress for fiscal 2014,2016, or $0.04$0.06 per basic and diluted share. As at the end of fiscal 2016, 100% of the distribution revenue had been converted to sell-in basis of revenue recognition.



During fiscal 2015, the Company recognized $40.9 million of incremental revenue from this change on additional product families, which resulted in a decrease to the net loss of $25.0 million or $0.07$0.08 per basic and diluted shares.

The Company records as a reduction to revenues reserves for sales returns, price protection and allowances, based upon historical experience rates and for any specific known customer amounts. The Company also provides certain distributors and EMSs with volume-pricing discounts, such as rebates and incentives, which are recorded as a reduction to revenues at the time of sale. Historically these volume discounts have not been significant.

68



Employee Benefit Plans

In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed the Spansion Innovates Group Cash Balance Plan (a defined benefit pension plan) in Japan.


A defined benefit pension plan is accounted for on an actuarial basis, which requires the selection of various assumptions such as turnover rates, discount rates and other factors. The discount rate assumption is determined by comparing the projected benefit payments to the Japanese corporate bonds yield curve as of end of the most recently completed fiscal year. The benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation (PBO), which represents the actuarial present value of benefits expected to be paid upon retirement. This liability is recorded in other long termlong-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net periodic pension cost is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and includes service cost. Service cost represents the actuarial present value of participant benefits earned in the current year. Interest cost represents the time value of money associated with the passage of time on the PBO. Gains or losses resulting from a change in the PBO if actual results differ from actuarial assumptions will be accumulated and amortized over the future life of the plan participants if they exceed 10% of the PBO, being the corridor amount. If the amount of a net gain or loss does not exceed the corridor amount, it will be recorded to other comprehensive income (loss). See Note 1718 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details of the pension plans.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value due to the relatively short maturity of these items. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of fair value measurements.

Cash Flow Hedges


The Company has an on-going cash flow hedge program and enters into cash flow hedges to protect non-functional currency revenue, inventory purchases and certain other operationaloperating expenses and has an on-going program of cash flow hedges to protect its non-functional currency revenues against variability in cash flows due tofrom foreign currency fluctuations.fluctuation. The Company does not enter into derivative securities for speculative purposes. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts that were designated as cash flow hedges have maturities between three and nine12 months. The maximum original duration of any contract allowable under the Company’s hedging policy is thirteen months. All hedging relationships are formally documented, and the hedges are designed to offset changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions at the inception of the hedge. The Company recognizes derivative instruments from hedging activities as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures them at fair value on a monthly basis. The Company records changes in the intrinsic value of its cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, until the forecasted transaction occurs. Interest charges or “forward points” on the forward contracts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are recorded in other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. When the forecasted transaction occurs, the Company reclassifies the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue or costs, depending on the risk hedged. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income to other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time.


The Company evaluates hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge prospectively as well as retrospectively and records any ineffective portion of the hedge in other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.


See Note 11 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details of the contracts.






Shipping and Handling Costs


The Company records costs related to shipping and handling of our products in cost of revenues.


Advertising Costs


Advertising costs consist of development and placement costs of the Company’s advertising campaigns and are charged to expense when incurred. Advertising expense was $5.0$3.2 million, $3.7$3.1 million and $2.9$5.0 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company uses the United States dollar as the functional currency for all of its foreign entities. Assets and liabilities of these entities are remeasured into the United States dollar using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, except for non-monetary assets and liabilities, such as property, plant and equipment, which are remeasured using historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are remeasured using average exchange rates in effect for the period, except for items related to assets and liabilities, such as depreciation, that are remeasured using historical exchange rates. The total gains (losses) from foreign currency re-measurement for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $0.7 million, $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively and are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For additional details related to items included in “Other income (expense), net,” see Note 13.

69


Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash equivalents, debt investments and trade accounts receivable. The Company’s investment policy requires cash investments to be placed with high-credit quality institutions and limits the amount of credit risk from any one issuer. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition whenever deemed necessary and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectability of all accounts receivable.

Outstanding accounts receivable from three of the Company’s distributors, accounted for 42%, 11% and 9%, respectively, of the consolidated accounts receivable as of January 3, 2016. Outstanding accounts receivable from three of the Company’s distributors, accounted for 12%, 11% and 9%, of the consolidated accounts receivable as of December 28, 2014.

Revenue generated through three of the Company’s distributors accounted for 25%, 10%, and 7%, respectively, of the consolidated revenue for fiscal 2015 . No end customer accounted for 10% of the consolidated revenue for fiscal 2015.

Revenue generated through three of the Company’s distributors, accounted for 13%, 10% and 10% respectively, of the consolidated revenue for fiscal 2014. No end customers accounted for 10% or more of the consolidated revenue for fiscal 2014.

Revenue generated through two of the Company’s distributors accounted for 11% and 10%, respectively, of the consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013. One end customer purchased the Company’s products both from the Company’s distributors and directly from the Company. Shipments to this end customer accounted for 12% of the consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013.



Income Taxes


The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when management cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be realized.


The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex global tax regulations. The Company recognizes potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when the Company determines the liabilities are no longer necessary. If the estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would result.


In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act"). The GILTI provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. The GILTI provision is effective for the Company beginning after December 31, 2017. The Company is currently analyzing the differences between book and tax basis amounts which could potentially reverse in future periods, resulting in an increase or decrease in GILTI in the period of reversal. Because of the complexity of the new provisions, the Company is continuing to evaluate the related accounting under U.S. GAAP, wherein companies are allowed to make an accounting policy election to either (i) account for GILTI as a component of tax expense in the period in which the tax is incurred (the “period cost method”), or (ii) account for GILTI in the Company’s measurement of deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). Currently, the Company has not elected a method and will only do so after its completion of the analysis of the GILTI provisions.  However, due to the valuation allowance position in the U.S., regardless of the method chosen, the Company does not expect to record a tax provision associated with the GILTI provisions until such time as the U.S. federal deferred taxes are more likely than not to be realized.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company uses the United States dollar as the functional currency for all of its foreign entities. Assets and liabilities of these entities are remeasured into the United States dollar using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, except for non-monetary assets and liabilities, such as property, plant and equipment, which are remeasured using historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are remeasured using average exchange rates in effect for the period, except for items related to assets and liabilities, such as depreciation, that are remeasured using historical exchange rates. The total gains (losses) from foreign currency re-measurement for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $(1.8) million, $(4.3) million and $0.7 million respectively and are included in "Other income (expense), net," in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For additional details related to items included in “Other income (expense), net,” see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.




Net loss per Share

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential of shares of common stock outstanding during the period including stock options or warrants, using the treasury stock method (by using the average stock price for the period to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants), and exchangeable notes, using the treasury stock method. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential of shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.


Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements


The following are the accounting pronouncements issued but not adopted that may materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements:

In February 2015,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”("FASB") issued an Accounting StandardsStandard Update (ASU) 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which is intended to improve upon and simplify the consolidation assessment required to evaluate whether organizations should consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have any material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued an ASU("ASU") on revenue from contracts with customers, ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This standard updateCustomers" ("ASC 606") which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customersrecognition model and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance.standards. The guidance isnew standard requires a company to recognize revenue as control of goods or services transfers to a customer at an amount that reflects the expected consideration to be received in exchange for those goods or services. It defines a five-step approach for recognizing revenue, which may require a company to use more judgment and make more estimates than under the current standard. The new standard will be effective for annual reportingthe Company starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Two methods of adoption are permitted: (a) full retrospective adoption, meaning this standard is applied to all periods including interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlypresented, or (b) modified retrospective adoption, is permitted for annual reporting periods including interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Asmeaning the cumulative effect of applying the new standard will supersede substantially all existing revenue guidance affectingis recognized as an adjustment to the Company under GAAP, it could impact revenue and cost recognition on sales across all the Company's business segments, in addition to its business processes and its information technology systems. opening retained earnings balance.


The Company is currently evaluatinghas selected the impact, if any,modified retrospective transition method. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

70


consolidated financial statements including the potential impact of the additional disclosure requirement primarily because the Company transitioned to the sell-in basis of revenue recognition by the end of 2016, as described in Note 1. The timing of revenue recognition of sale of custom products is also not expected to change as such custom products typically have an alternative use. The non-recurring engineering arrangements will require the Company to use an input method as the basis for recognizing revenue, however, the impact is not expected to be material upon adoption as there were no material open non-recurring engineering arrangements as of December 31, 2017. The Company is implementing changes to its accounting policies, internal controls, and disclosures to support the new standard; however, these changes will not be material.

In July 2015,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying2016-02, Leases, ("Topic 842"), which replaces most current lease guidance when it becomes effective. This standard update intends to increase the Measurementtransparency and improve comparability by requiring entities to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases, with certain exceptions. The new standard states that a lessee will recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset for the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of Inventory," which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling pricesexpense recognition in the ordinary courseconsolidated statements of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory that is measured using last-in, last-out ("LIFO"). This ASU isoperations. The new guidance will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with earlythe Company starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption permitted at the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period.is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impacteffect that the pronouncementnew guidance will have on the Company’sits consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.


In FebruaryOctober 2016, the FASB issued an ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).2016-16, “Intra- Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.The core principle of Topic 842For public entities, ASU 2016-16 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. All leases create an asset and a liability for the lessee in accordance with FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial Statements, and, therefore, recognition of those lease assets and lease liabilities represents an improvement over previous GAAP, which did not require lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized for most leases.  This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  Early adoption is permitted. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous GAAP.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures.

71


Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the financial statements. Under the ASU, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-03 for the fiscal year 2015 and presented the debt issuance costs related to the new Term Loan debt as a direct deduction from the related debt liability.

In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements — Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting”. FASB ASU No. 2015-15 amends subtopic 835-30 to include that the SEC would not object to the deferral and presentation of debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequent amortization of the deferred costs over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement.  The Company early adopted ASU 2015-15 for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.  The Company has chosen to continue presentation of debt issuance costs as an asset for its revolving line of credit borrowings.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” This ASU simplifies the treatment of adjustments to provisional amounts recognized in the period for items in a business combination for which the accounting is incomplete at the end of the reporting period. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 20152017, and for interim periods therein.within those fiscal years. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter fiscal 2018. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." The standard eliminates the second step in the goodwill impairment test which requires an entity to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill.  Instead, an entity should recognize an impairment loss if the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, with the impairment loss not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting


unit. The standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests conducted in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting." ASU 2017-09 amends the requirements in GAAP related to accounting for changes to stock compensation awards. The guidance in ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities." The amendments in ASU 2017-12 are intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting, and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. The guidance in ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 standard for2016-09 as of the first day of the 2017 fiscal year. The provisions of ASU 2016-09 related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements and forfeitures were adopted using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of January 2, 2017. The provisions of ASU 2016-09 related to the recognition of excess benefits in the income statement and classification in the statement of cash flows were adopted prospectively and the prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. The Company has elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur and adopted this change using a modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative adjustment recorded to opening accumulated deficit. The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to opening accumulated deficit of $2.3 million, with a commensurate increase in paid-in capital. The previously unrecognized tax benefits were recorded as deferred tax asset of $138.0 million, which was fully offset by a valuation allowance resulting in no impact to opening accumulated deficit. In addition, due to the full valuation allowance on the U.S. deferred tax assets, there was no impact to the income tax provision from excess tax benefits in fiscal 2017 as a result of this adoption.

Revision of Previously Issued Financial Statements

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, certain immaterial errors that originated in fiscal years ended January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016 were identified. The Company assessed the materiality of these errors in accordance with the SEC guidance on considering the effects of prior-period misstatements based on an analysis of quantitative and qualitative factors on both the annual and interim period financial statements. Based on this analysis, the Company determined that these errors were immaterial to each of the prior fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years. However, the Company has concluded that correcting these errors in its fiscal 2017 financial statements would materially understate the net loss for the year ending December 31, 2017. Accordingly, the Company has reflected the correction of these prior period errors in the periods in which they originated and revised its consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2017, and its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss), its consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity, and its consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016.

These errors consisted primarily of errors in certain assumptions and calculations used in the determination of non-cash stock-based compensation primarily relating to the Employee Share Purchase Program (“ESPP”). These errors resulted in an overstatement of expenses and net loss or understatement of net income, and did not impact cash generated from operations, related to the fiscal years ended January 3, 2016 and January 1, 2017 and the first three quarters in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The impact of these errors on internal controls over financial reporting has been included in Item 9A of this Form 10-K. In Novemberaddition, concurrent with the correction of the aforementioned items, the Company is also revising its previously issued financial statements for certain other


immaterial prior period errors that were previously corrected through out-of-period adjustments in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in reporting periods other than those in which these errors originated.
The effect of the immaterial corrections on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2017 are as follows:
 As of January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Revised Consolidated Balance Sheet Amounts:As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
Additional paid-in-capital$5,676,236
$(16,592)$5,659,644
Accumulated deficit$(1,445,033)$16,592
$(1,428,441)

The effect of the immaterial corrections on the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal years 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
 Year Ended January 1, 2017 Year Ended January 3, 2016
Revised Consolidated Statements of Operations AmountsAs previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Cost of revenues$1,237,974
$(2,434)$1,235,540
 $1,207,850
$(3,654)$1,204,196
Research and development331,737
(562)331,175
 281,391
(6,578)274,813
Selling, general and administrative317,383
(21)317,362
 323,570
(3,343)320,227
Total costs and expenses2,534,863
(3,017)2,531,846
 1,944,758
(13,575)1,931,183
Operating loss(611,755)3,017
(608,738) (336,905)13,575
(323,330)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest(666,634)3,017
(663,617) (357,030)13,575
(343,455)
Net loss(686,894)3,017
(683,877) (381,138)13,575
(367,563)
Net loss attributable to Cypress$(686,251)$3,017
$(683,234) $(378,867)$13,575
$(365,292)
Net loss per share attributable to Cypress:       
Basic$(2.15)$0.01
$(2.14) $(1.25)$0.04
$(1.21)
Diluted$(2.15)$0.01
$(2.14) $(1.25)$0.04
$(1.21)

The effect of the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classificationimmaterial corrections on the consolidated statements of Deferred Taxes, which simplifiescomprehensive income (loss) for the presentationfiscal years 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
 Year Ended January 1, 2017 Year Ended January 3, 2016
Revised Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
 (In thousands)
Net loss$(686,894)$3,017
$(683,877) $(381,138)$13,575
$(367,563)
Comprehensive loss(695,478)3,017
(692,461) (381,319)13,575
(367,744)
Comprehensive loss attributable for Cypress$(694,835)$3,017
$(691,818) $(379,048)$13,575
$(365,473)



The effect of deferred income taxes. This ASU requires thatthe immaterial corrections on the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity for the fiscal years 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
Revised Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity:

 Year Ended January 1, 2017

As previously reported Adjustments As revised
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit
 (In thousands)
Net loss attributable to Cypress$
 $(686,251) $
 $3,017
 $
 $(683,234)
Stock-based compensation$105,536
 $
 $(6,755) $
 $98,781
 $
            
Revised Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity:

 Year Ended January 3, 2016

As previously reported Adjustments As revised
 Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to Cypress$
 $(378,867) $
 $13,575
 $
 $(365,292)
Stock-based compensation$95,814
 $
 $(9,837) $
 $85,977
 $

The effect of the immaterial corrections on the consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
 Year ended January 1, 2017 Year ended January 3, 2016
Revised Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
 (In thousands)
Net (loss) income$(686,894)$3,017
$(683,877) $(381,138)$13,575
$(367,563)
Stock-based compensation expense105,268
(6,755)98,513
 93,527
(9,837)83,690
Changes in accounts payable and other liabilities76,699
2,777
79,476
 (86,960)(2,777)(89,737)
Changes in price adjustment reserve for sales to distributors99,428
961
100,389
 32,666
(961)31,705
Net cash provided by operating activities$217,419
$
$217,419
 $8,801
$
$8,801




The effect of the immaterial corrections on the disclosures related to stock-based compensation for the fiscal years 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
 Year Ended January 1, 2017 Year Ended January 3, 2016
Revised Stock-Based Compensation Footnote:As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
 (In thousands)
Cost of revenues$21,366
$(3,395)$17,971
 $16,459
$(2,693)$13,766
Research and development41,528
(3,339)38,189
 25,719
(3,801)21,918
Selling, general, and administrative42,374
(21)42,353
 51,349
(3,343)48,006
Total stock-based compensation expense$105,268
$(6,755)$98,513
 $93,527
$(9,837)$83,690
        
 Year Ended January 1, 2017 Year Ended January 3, 2016
Revised Stock-Based Compensation Footnote:As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
 (In thousands)
Stock options$700
$
$700
 $1,920
$
$1,920
Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards81,905
3,265
85,170
 74,897

74,897
ESPP22,663
(10,020)12,643
 16,710
(9,837)6,873
Total stock-based compensation expense$105,268
$(6,755)$98,513
 $93,527
$(9,837)$83,690

The effect of the immaterial corrections on the disclosures related to deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-currentat January 1, 2017 is as follows:
 Year Ended January 1, 2017
Revised income tax footnote disclosures:As previously reportedAdjustmentsAs revised
 (In thousands)
Credits and net operating loss carryovers$493,879
$2,569
$496,448
Reserves and accruals133,614
(13,161)120,453
Excess of book over tax depreciation35,886

35,886
Deferred income26,457

26,457
Total deferred tax assets689,836
(10,592)679,244
Less valuation allowance(458,674)13,644
(445,030)
Deferred tax assets, net231,162
3,052
234,214
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Foreign earnings and others(160,862)(3,052)(163,914)
Intangible assets arising from acquisitions(71,960)
(71,960)
Total deferred tax liabilities(232,822)(3,052)(235,874)
Net deferred tax assets$(1,660)$
$(1,660)








The accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements reflect the impact of the correction of the errors through the revision noted above.

NOTE 2. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Acquisition of IoT Business from Broadcom
On July 5, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of certain assets primarily related to the IoT business of Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 28, 2016. In connection with the closing of the transaction, the Company paid Broadcom $550 million in a statementcash. The results of financial position. The standardthe business acquired as part of this acquisition is effectivereported in the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,Company’s Microcontroller and Connectivity Division.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Approximately $9.2 million in expenses were incurred as acquisition expenses related to the IoT business and were recorded in Selling, general and administrative line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The table below represents the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets acquired based on their estimated fair values:
 Final allocation as of
January 1, 2017
  
Intangible assets$324,000
Property, plant and equipment16,270
Inventories11,655
Other current assets6,550
Other long-term assets4,203
Goodwill189,094
Total assets acquired$551,772
Other current liabilities(1,199)
Other long-term liabilities(573)
Total liabilities assumed(1,772)
Fair value of net assets acquired$550,000
The purchase price was allocated based on the estimated net tangible and intangible assets of the IoT business that existed on the date of the acquisition. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management at the time of the acquisition.


Identifiable intangible assets
The table below shows the valuation of the intangible assets acquired from Broadcom along with their estimated useful lives:
  Amount Estimated life
  (in thousands) (in years)
Existing Technology
$189,300
 4
In-Process Research and Development Technology Arrangement


88,900
 N/A
Backlog
13,500
 <1
Customer Relationships
20,000
 10
License Agreements
3,700
 1
Trademarks
8,600
 4
Total intangible assets
$324,000
  
In-process research and development ("IPR&D") consisted of six projects. Of these projects, three projects were completed in fiscal 2017 and the remaining three projects are expected to be completed during fiscal 2018. Early adoptionThe estimated remaining costs to complete the IPR&D projects were approximately $8.9 million as of the acquisition date. The acquired IPR&D will not be amortized until completion of the related products which is permitteddetermined by when the underlying projects reach technological feasibility and commence commercial production. Upon completion, each IPR&D project will be amortized over its useful life which are expected to be approximately 4 years.
Goodwill
The excess of the fair value of the purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized is primarily attributable to the assembled workforce, a reduction in costs and other synergies, and an increase in product development capabilities. Goodwill was initially allocated to the Company’s previous Data Communications Division and was reallocated to the new Microcontroller and Connectivity Division during the fourth quarter of 2016. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition is deductible for any interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 and prospectively applied ASU 2015-17 to fiscal year 2015.

NOTE 2. MERGER WITH SPANSION

tax purposes.


Spansion Merger

On March 12, 2015, Cypressthe Company completed itsthe merger (“Merger”) with Spansion ("the Merger"Inc. (“Spansion”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, as of December 1, 2014 ("the Merger Agreement"(the “Merger Agreement”), for a total purchase consideration of approximately $2.8 billion. In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, Spansion shareholders received 2.457 Cypress shares for each Spansion share they owned. The shareholders of each company initially owned approximately 50% of the post-merger company. The Merger has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, with Cypress treated as the accounting acquirer. The Company incurred $37.5 million in Merger costs for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016, which were recorded in the selling, general and administrative expense line of the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The total purchase consideration of approximately $2.8 billion consistsconsisted of the following:

 

 

Purchase

Consideration

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Fair value of Cypress common stock issued to Spansion shareholders

 

$

2,570,458

 

Fair value of partially vested Spansion equity awards assumed by Cypress

 

 

6,825

 

Fair value of vested Spansion options assumed by Cypress

 

 

89,582

 

Cash provided by Cypress to repay Spansion term loan

 

 

150,000

 

Total purchase consideration

 

$

2,816,865

 


72


 Amount
 (In thousands)
Fair value of Cypress common stock issued to Spansion shareholders$2,570,458
Fair value of partially vested Spansion equity awards assumed by Cypress6,825
Fair value of vested Spansion options assumed by Cypress89,582
Cash provided by Cypress to repay Spansion term loan150,000
Total purchase consideration$2,816,865

In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed stock options and RSUs originally granted by Spansion and converted them into Cypress stock options and RSUs. The fair value of the stock options assumed were determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model with market-based assumptions. The fair value of partially


vested Spansion equity awards iswas $15.68 per share, the Cypress closing stock price on March 12, 2015. The fair value of unvested equity awards relating to future services, and not yet earned, will beis being recorded as operating expenses over the remaining service periods. Option pricing models require the use of highly subjective market assumptions, including expected stock price volatility, which if changed can materially affect fair value estimates.

The table below represents the final allocation of the purchase price to the net assets acquired based on their estimated fair values asvalues:
  Final allocation as of January 3, 2016
   
Cash and cash equivalents $44,870
Short-term investments 1,433
Accounts receivable, net 99,387
Inventories 450,634
Other current assets 56,630
Property, plant and equipment, net 356,908
Intangible assets, net 860,700
Goodwill 1,673,186
Other long-term assets 63,497
Total assets acquired $3,607,245
Accounts payable (155,336)
Accrued compensation and benefits (44,669)
Income taxes payable (1,399)
Other current liabilities (158,113)
Deferred income taxes and other long term liabilities (18,202)
Other non current liabilities (21,477)
Long-term debt (1) (391,184)
Total liabilities assumed $(790,380)
Fair value of net assets acquired $2,816,865
(1) Includes the fair value of March 12, 2015.

 

 

Fair Values as of

March 12, 2015

 

 

Changes through

January 3, 2016

 

 

Final allocation as of

January 3, 2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

44,870

 

 

 

 

 

$

44,870

 

Short-term investments

 

 

1,433

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,433

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

99,977

 

 

 

(590

)

(2)

 

99,387

 

Inventories

 

 

450,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,634

 

Other current assets

 

 

58,959

 

 

 

(2,329

)

(3)

 

56,630

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

356,908

 

 

 

 

 

 

356,908

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

860,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

860,700

 

Goodwill (2)

 

 

1,676,036

 

 

 

(2,850

)

 

 

1,673,186

 

Other long-term assets

 

 

63,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,497

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

3,613,014

 

 

 

(5,769

)

 

 

3,607,245

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(155,336

)

 

 

 

 

 

(155,336

)

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

 

(44,669

)

 

 

 

 

 

(44,669

)

Income taxes payable

 

 

(1,399

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,399

)

Other current liabilities

 

 

(158,083

)

 

 

(30

)

(4)

 

(158,113

)

Deferred income taxes and other long term liabilities

 

 

(24,001

)

 

 

5,799

 

(5)

 

(18,202

)

Other non current liabilities

 

 

(21,477

)

 

 

 

 

 

(21,477

)

Long-term debt (1)

 

 

(391,184

)

 

 

 

 

 

(391,184

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(796,149

)

 

 

5,769

 

 

 

(790,380

)

Fair value of net assets acquired

 

$

2,816,865

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,816,865

 

(1)        Includes the fair value of the debt and equity components of Spansion's Exchangeable 2.00% Senior Notes assumed by the Company.

(2)       The Company determined that one customer account receivable balance that the Company assessed as collectible at the time of the Merger was determined uncollectible which led to a decrease of $0.6 million in the fair value of accounts receivables with a corresponding increase in goodwill.

(3)       The Company obtained new information regarding the valuation of other receivables as of the acquisition date which led to a decrease in the fair value of current assets of $2.3 million, and a corresponding increase in goodwill.

(4)       The Company obtained new information regarding the valuation of accrued liabilities as of the acquisition date which led to a net increase in the fair value of other current liabilities of $30 thousand, and a corresponding increase in goodwill.

(5)       The Company obtained additional information related to its deferred income taxes which led to an increase in the deferred income taxes and other long term liabilities and a corresponding decrease in goodwill.

The Company does not believe that the measurement period adjustments had a material impact on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, Balance Sheet or Cash Flows in any period previously reported and, therefore, no retrospective adjustment was made to the Company's previously issued Consolidated Financial Statements.

73


The table below shows the valuation of the intangible assets acquired from Spansion, Inc. along with their estimated remaining useful lives:.

 

 

As of March 12,

2015

 

 

 

Estimated

range of lives

(in years)

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Existing Technology

 

$

507,100

 

 

 

4 to 6

 

In-Process Research and Development Technology

 

 

212,300

 

 

 

N/A

 

Backlog

 

 

14,500

 

 

 

1

 

Customer/Distributor Relationships

 

 

97,300

 

 

 

9

 

License Agreements

 

 

9,400

 

 

 

3

 

Trade Name / Trademarks

 

 

20,100

 

 

 

10

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

860,700

 

 

 

 

 


In-process research and development ("IPR&D") consists of 21 projects, primarily relating to the development of process technologies to manufacture NOR, NAND, Analog, and MCU products. The projects are expected to be completed over the next 2 years. The estimated remaining costs to complete the IPR&D projects were $15.3 million as of the acquisition date. The acquired IPR&D will not be amortized until completion of the related products which is determined by when the underlying projects reach technological feasibility and commence commercial production. Upon completion, each IPR&D project will be amortized over its useful life; useful lives for IPR&D are expected to range between 4 years and 6 years.

As of January 3, 2016 five out of 21 projects originally identified, representing $36.2 million of the total capitalized IPR&D of $212.3 million, had reached technological feasibility and were transferred to developed technology. Refer to Note 4 for further details. No impairments have been identified as of January 3, 2016.

 Amount Estimated
range of lives
 (In thousands) (in years)
Existing Technology$507,100
 4 to 6
In-Process Research and Development Technology212,300
 N/A
Backlog14,500
 1
Customer/Distributor Relationships97,300
 9
License Agreements9,400
 3
Trade Name / Trademarks20,100
 10
Total intangible assets$860,700
  
The purchase price has beenwas allocated based on the estimated net tangible and intangible assets of Spansion that existed on the date of the Merger. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management at the time of the Merger. During the fourth quarter of 2015, as additional information became available, theThe Company finalized its purchase price allocation thatin the fourth quarter of 2015 when additional information became available, which resulted in change in values allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities.



Identifiable intangible assets

Developed technologies acquired primarily consistconsisted of Spansion's existing technologies related to embedded systems semiconductors, which include flash memory, microcontroller, mixed-signal and analog products. An income approach was used to value Spansion’s developed technologies. Using this approach, the estimated fair value was calculated using expected future cash flows from specific products discounted to their net present values at an appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return. A discount rate of 7.5% was used to discount the cash flows to the present value.

Customer relationships representrepresented the fair value of projected cash flows that will be derived from the sale of products to Spansion’s existing customers based on existing, in-process, and future versions of the existing technology. Customer relationships were valued utilizing a form of the income approach known as the “distributor” method since the primary income producing asset of the business was determined to be the technology assets. Under this premise, the margin a distributor owns is deemed to be the margin attributable to the customer relationships. This isolates the cash flows attributable to the customer relationships that a market participant would be willing to pay for.

IPR&D represents the estimated fair values of incomplete Spansion research and development projects that had not reached technological feasibility as of the date of Merger. In the future, the fair value of each project at the Merger date will be either amortized or impaired depending on whether the projects are completed or abandoned. The fair value of IPR&D was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method under the income approach. This method reflects the present value of the projected cash flows that are expected to be generated by the IPR&D less charges representing the contribution of other assets to those cash flows. A discount rate of 10.5% was used to discount the cash flows to the present value.

Trade names and trademarks are considered a type of guarantee of a certain level of quality or performance represented by the Spansion brand. Trade names and trademarks were valued using the “relief-from-royalty income” approach. This method is based on the assumption that in lieu of ownership, a market participant would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of this asset. A discount rate of 9.0% was used to discount the cash flows to the present value.

74


License agreements representrepresented the estimated fair value of Spansion’s existing license agreements under which Spansion generatesgenerated revenue by licensing its intellectual property to third parties and assists its customers in developing and prototyping their designs by providing software and hardware development tools, drivers and simulation models for system-level integration. License agreements were valued using a form of the income approach known as the of “multi-period excess earnings” approach. Under this approach, the expected cash flows associated with the License agreements were projected then discounted to present value at a rate of return that considers the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money.
In-process research and development ("IPR&D") represented the estimated fair values of incomplete Spansion research and development projects that had not reached technological feasibility as of the date of Merger. Fair value of each project at the Merger date is being either amortized or impaired depending on whether the projects are completed or abandoned. The fair value of IPR&D was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method under the income approach. This method reflects the present value of the projected cash flows that are expected to be generated by the IPR&D less charges representing the contribution of other assets to those cash flows. A discount rate of 5.0%10.5% was used to discount the cash flows to the present value.


IPR&D consisted of 21 projects, primarily relating to the development of process technologies to manufacture NOR, NAND, Analog, and MCU products. The acquired IPR&D is amortized until completion of the related products which is determined by when the underlying projects reach technological feasibility and commence commercial production. Upon completion, each IPR&D project will be amortized over its useful life; useful lives for IPR&D are expected to range between 4 years and 6 years.
As of December 31, 2017, 17 out of 21 projects originally identified, representing $97.1 million of the total capitalized IPR&D of $212.3 million, had reached technological feasibility and were transferred to developed technology. During fiscal 2016, the Company recognized a $33.9 million impairment charge related to two IPR&D projects that were canceled due to changes in the Company’s product portfolio strategy. The impairment charges are included in the “Impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There are two remaining IPR&D projects which are expected to be completed in fiscal 2018.
Goodwill

The excess of the fair value of the Merger consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized is primarily attributable to the assembled workforce, a reduction in costs and other synergies, and an increase in product development capabilities. The goodwill resulting from the Merger is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill has been allocated to the reporting units expected to benefit from the Merger.

Pro forma consolidated results of operations



The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operationsfinancial data for the fiscal yearyears ended January 3, 2016 and January 1, 2017 assume as ifthat the acquisitions of the IoT business and Spansion Merger had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2014.2016. The pro forma information includes adjustments to amortization and depreciation for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, adjustments to stock-based compensation expense, and interest expense for the incremental indebtedness incurred. The pro forma results for the year ended January 3, 2016 also include utilizationincurred, amortization of the net increase in the cost basisstep up to fair value of acquired inventory, acquisition related expenses and the Mergertax related expenses. The pro forma data are for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations of the combined business had the Mergeracquisition actually occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 20142015 or of the results of future operations of the combined business.businesses. Consequently, actual results will differ from the unaudited pro forma information presented below.

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Revenues

 

$

1,796,266

 

 

$

1,977,352

 

Net loss

 

$

(340,465

)

 

$

(597,980

)

Net loss per share attributable to Cypress

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.76

)

 

$

(2.72

)

Diluted

 

$

(0.76

)

 

$

(2.72

)

 Years Ended
 
January 1,
2017
 
January 3,
2016
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Revenues$2,018,124
 $1,982,824
Net loss$(722,342) $(491,969)
Net loss per share attributable to Cypress 
  
Basic$(2.26) $(1.63)
Diluted$(2.26) $(1.63)

NOTE 3. DIVESTITURES

Sale of TrueTouch® mobile touchscreen business

On August 1, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the TrueTouch® Mobile touchscreen business to Parade Technologies (“Parade”) for total cash proceeds of $98.6 million pursuant to the definitive agreement signed on June 11, 2015. Of the total cash proceeds, $10.0 million are held in an escrow account until January 2017GOODWILL


Annual impairment assessment
Goodwill is subject to any indemnity claims on post-closing adjustments, peran annual impairment test during the terms of the agreement. In connection with the transaction, the Company sold certain assets associated with the disposed business mostly consisting of inventory with a net book value of $10.5 million and recognized a total gain of $66.5 million in the third fiscalCompany’s fourth quarter of 2015. This gain has been presented aseach fiscal year, or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist, using either a separate line item "Gain on divestiture of TrueTouch® mobile business" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Also in connection with the transaction, the Company entered intoqualitative or a Manufacturing Service Agreement (MSA) in which the Company agreed to sell finished products and devices to Parade during the one-year period following the close of the transaction.quantitative assessment. The terms of the MSA indicated that the Company would sell finished wafers to Parade at agreed-upon prices that were considered below fair market value, indicating that there was an embedded fair value that would be realized by Parade through those terms. Accordingly, the Company has allocated $19.9 million out of the $98.6 million proceeds to the fair value of the MSA based on the forecasted wafer sales to Parade for the subsequent one-year period. Such amount was deferred on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet initially and is being amortized to revenue as the Company sells products to Parade. During the year ended January 3, 2016, the Company recognized $5.7 million of revenue from amortization of such deferred revenue.

75


The following table summarizes the components of the gain:

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash Proceeds (a)

 

$

98,635

 

Deferred Revenue

 

 

(19,867

)

Assets Sold:

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

(69

)

Inventories

 

 

(9,290

)

Prepaid Expenses

 

 

(1,115

)

Transaction and other costs

 

 

(1,822

)

Gain on Divestiture

 

$

66,472

 

(a)

Includes $10.0 million held in escrow account until January 2017 per the terms of the agreement.

NOTE 4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The Company’sCompany's impairment review process compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which the goodwill resides to its carrying value.  The Company has four reporting units of which two, Memory Products division (MPD) and Programmable Systems Division (PSD), have goodwill.  

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended January 3, 2016, are as follows:

 

 

MPD

 

 

PSD

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Goodwill as of December 28, 2014

 

$

33,860

 

 

$

31,836

 

 

$

65,696

 

Goodwill from merger with Spansion (1)

 

 

739,036

 

 

 

937,000

 

 

 

1,676,036

 

Measurement period adjustments

 

 

(2,850

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,850

)

Goodwill as of January 3, 2016

 

$

770,046

 

 

$

968,836

 

 

$

1,738,882

 

(1)

Refer Note 2 for further details.

In fiscal 2015,2017, the Company elected to perform a two-step quantitativequalitative analysis for impairment on goodwill based on which no goodwill impairment test for eachwas identified in fiscal 2017. In assessing the qualitative factors, the Company considered the impact of its reporting units.  The first stepthese key factors: 1) change in the industry and competitive environment, 2) market capitalization, 3) stock price and 4) overall financial performance.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, immediately prior to and immediately after the quantitative goodwill impairment test is to identify a potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair valuereallocation of goodwill is determined into the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. Based on this test,new reporting units, the Company determined that no impairment was indicated as the estimated fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value.performed a quantitative assessment to test goodwill for impairment. The Company estimated the fair values of its reporting units using a combination of the income and market approach. These valuation approaches consider a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, forecasted financial information, growth rates, terminal or residual values, discount rates and comparable multiples from publicly traded companies in the Company’s industry and require the Company to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and the future profitability of its’its business.

76


Based on the Company’sthis goodwill impairment testing,test, the Company determinedestimated that there was no impairment of goodwill.  The fair value of the MPD reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 53% and the fair value of PSDequity of all reporting unitunits exceeded itstheir carrying value by 9%.  Based onimmediately prior to and immediately after the Company’s testing, the Company determined that there is a risk of the PSD reporting unit failing the first step of goodwillreorganization. As such, no impairment test in future periods.  For this reporting unit, declines in the Company’s stock price or peers’ stock price, relatively small declines in the future performance and cash flows of the reporting unit or small changes in other key assumptions, such as revenue growth rates and discount rates, may result in the recognition of a material impairment charge to the Company’s earnings as a result of a write-down of the carrying value of goodwill was identified during the goodwill associated with that reporting unit. fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

The income approach valuations for PSD included the following assumptions for 2015:

Year Ended

January 3, 2016

Discount rate

9%

Long-term growth rate

4%

Tax rate

28%

Risk free rate

4%

Peer company beta

0.97

The Company’s next annual evaluation of the goodwill by reporting unit will be performed on the first day ofduring the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016,2018, or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, challenging economic conditions, such as a decline in the Company’sCompany's operating results, an unfavorable industry or macroeconomic environment, a substantial decline in the Company’sour stock price, or any other adverse change in market conditions. Such conditions could have the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates that the Company uses to calculate the fair value of its reporting units, which could result in a decrease in fair value and require it to record goodwill impairment charges.


Goodwill as at December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 was $1.4 billion, of which $782.9 million and $656.6 million was allocated to Microcontroller & Connectivity Division (“MCD”) and Memory Products Division (“MPD”) respectively.



Changes in carrying value and allocation of goodwill

During fiscal years 2014, 2015 and through the first three quarters of fiscal 2016, the Company to record a material goodwill impairment charge.

Inhad four reporting units - MPD, Programmable Solutions Division (“PSD”), Data Communications Division (“DCD”) and Emerging Technologies Division (“ETD”), of which MPD, PSD and DCD carried goodwill.


During the second quarter of fiscal 2014,2016, the Company electedconcluded that a combination of factors, including (a) decreases in its forecasted operating results when compared with the expectations of the PSD reporting unit at the time of the Spansion Merger, primarily in consumer markets as the Company has subsequently increased its focus on the automotive and industrial end markets, (b) evaluation of business priorities due to performrecent changes in management, and (c) certain market conditions necessitated a qualitativequantitative impairment analysis for impairment on goodwill rather than to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company assessed qualitative factors to determine whether it was necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. After assessing many qualitative factors pertinent to the Company, it determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. In assessing the qualitative factors, the Company considered the impact of these key factors: 1) change in the industry and competitive environment, 2) market capitalization, 3) stock price and 4) overall financial performance. Based on the results of the testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized in fiscal 2014.

In fiscal 2013, the Company elected to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of the quantitative goodwill impairment test is to identify a potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The second step compares the implied fair value of the Goodwill related to PSD which resulted in an impairment charge of $488.5 million.

As a result of the IoT business acquisition during the third quarter of fiscal 2016, the DCD reporting unit’sunit recorded $189.1 million in goodwill.
As a result of a reorganization in the operations of the Company, effective in the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company has two reporting units MPD and MCD. Upon the change of the reporting units, the carrying value of goodwill withwas reallocated to the new MPD and MCD reporting units based on relative fair values of the respective reporting units. Immediately prior to and following the reallocation, an analysis to assess the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill was carried out which did not indicate any impairment.
The changes in the carrying amount of that goodwill.goodwill by reportable segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 MPD PSD DCD MCD Total
 (in thousands)
Goodwill as of January 3, 2016 (1)$770,046
 $968,836
 $
 $
 $1,738,882
Goodwill impairment  (488,504)     (488,504)
Goodwill from acquisition of IoT Business
 
 217,726
 
 217,726
Measurement period adjustments
 
 (28,632) 
 (28,632)
Reallocation of goodwill(113,447) (480,332) (189,094) 782,873
 
Goodwill as of January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017(2)$656,599
 $
 $
 $782,873
 $1,439,472

(1) The implied fair valueCompany had previously recorded an impairment charge of goodwill is determined$351.3 million in the same manner asfourth quarter of fiscal
2008
(2) There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. Based on the results of the testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized in fiscal 2013.

Intangible Assets

from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017.


NOTE 4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following tables presenttable presents details of the Company’s total intangible assets:

 

 

As of January 3, 2016

 

 

As of December 28, 2014

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net (c)

 

 

Gross

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Acquisition-related intangible

   assets (a)

 

$

1,012,472

 

 

$

(226,417

)

 

$

786,055

 

 

$

151,773

 

 

$

(118,357

)

 

$

33,416

 

Non-acquisition related

   intangible assets (b)

 

 

13,368

 

 

 

(10,228

)

 

 

3,140

 

 

 

10,523

 

 

 

(10,021

)

 

 

502

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

1,025,840

 

 

$

(236,645

)

 

$

789,195

 

 

$

162,296

 

 

$

(128,378

)

 

$

33,918

 



 As of December 31, 2017 As of January 1, 2017
 Gross Accumulated
Amortization
 Net (a) Gross Accumulated
Amortization
 Net (a)
 (In thousands)
Developed technology and other intangible assets           
Acquisition-related intangible assets$1,072,824
 $(490,327) $582,497
 $1,021,244
 $(295,023) $726,221
Non-acquisition related intangible assets19,884
 (10,828) 9,056
 12,000
 (8,863) 3,137
Total developed technology and other intangible assets$1,092,708
 $(501,155) 591,553
 $1,033,244
 $(303,886) $729,358
In-process research and development123,567
 
 123,567
 175,203
 
 175,203
Total intangible assets$1,216,275
 $(501,155) $715,120
 $1,208,447
 $(303,886) $904,561

(a)

Refer Note 2 for details on valuation of

(a)Included in the intangible assets are in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) projects acquired from Spansion Inc.

(b)

The increase inas part of the Gross Carrying value relates to new license agreement entered into during fiscal 2015.

(c)

The Net Acquisition-related intangible assets contains $176.1 millionMerger and the acquisition of IPR&D which remain to attainthe IoT business, that had not attained technological feasibility and commercial production.

IPR&D assets are accounted for initially as indefinite-lived intangible assets until the completion of the associated research and development efforts. Upon completion, the carrying value of every related intangible asset will be amortized over the remaining estimated life of the asset beginning in the period in which the project is completed.

77


As

The below table presents details of January 3, 2016, $36.2the IPR&D assets as of December 31, 2017:
 (in thousands)
As of January 3, 2016$176,216
Intangibles acquired as part of IoT business (Note 2)88,900
Technological feasibility achieved(55,969)
Projects impaired(33,944)
As of January 1, 2017175,203
Technological feasibility achieved(51,636)
As of December 31, 2017$123,567

During fiscal 2017, five projects representing $51.6 million of the total capitalized IPR&D, with estimated useful lives of $212.3 million5 years, had reached technological feasibility and waswere transferred to developed technology,technology.
During fiscal 2016, the Company recognized a $33.9 million impairment charge related to be amortized overtwo IPR&D projects that were canceled due to changes in the estimated useful lifeCompany’s product portfolio strategy. The impairment charges are included in the “Impairment of 5 years and amortizationacquisition-related intangible assets” line in the Consolidated Statements of $2.6 million was recorded during the twelve months ended January 3, 2016 for these projects. Operations.
The Company expects the remaining IPR&D projects as of December 31, 2017 to attain technological feasibility and commence commercial production by the second half ofin fiscal 2016.

2018.

As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, the estimated future amortization expense ofrelated to developed technology and other intangible assets was as follows:

Fiscal Year

 

(In thousands)

 

2016

 

 

123,968

 

2017

 

 

120,966

 

2018

 

 

118,477

 

2019

 

 

111,249

 

2020 and future

 

 

138,319

 

Total future amortization expense

 

$

612,979

 

Fiscal Year (In thousands)
2018 $198,495
2019 190,114
2020 128,784
2021 34,499
2022 and future 39,661
Total future amortization expense $591,553



NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets/Liabilities MeasuredASSETS HELD FOR SALE

In fiscal 2016, the Company committed to a plan to sell its wafer manufacturing facility located in Bloomington, Minnesota, as well as a building in Austin, Texas. The carrying value of these assets held for sale as at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the Company’send of fiscal 2016 reflected the lower of the carrying value or fair value, hierarchy for its financial assetsnet of estimated costs to sell the assets. The Company performed an analysis and liabilities measured atestimated the fair value on a recurring basis as of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014:

 

 

As of January 3, 2016

 

 

As of December 28, 2014

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Financial Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported as cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

119

 

 

$

 

 

$

119

 

 

$

7,665

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,665

 

Total cash equivalents

 

 

119

 

 

 

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

7,665

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,665

 

Reported as short-term investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,993

 

Corporate notes and bonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,599

 

 

 

5,599

 

Federal agency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,615

 

 

 

3,615

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

 

 

 

869

 

 

 

869

 

Total short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

4,993

 

 

 

10,083

 

 

 

15,076

 

Reported as long-term investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketable equity securities

 

 

6,516

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,516

 

 

 

8,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,493

 

Total long-term investments

 

 

6,516

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,516

 

 

 

8,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,493

 

Employee deferred compensation

   plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

 

3,333

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,333

 

 

 

2,957

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,957

 

Mutual funds

 

 

22,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,023

 

 

 

24,114

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,114

 

Equity securities

 

 

8,624

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,624

 

 

 

9,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,352

 

Fixed income

 

 

 

 

 

3,227

 

 

 

3,227

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,798

 

 

 

3,798

 

Money market funds

 

 

4,042

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,042

 

 

 

3,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,895

 

Total employee deferred

   compensation plan assets

 

 

38,022

 

 

 

3,227

 

 

 

41,249

 

 

 

40,318

 

 

 

3,798

 

 

 

44,116

 

Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

966

 

 

 

966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financial assets

 

$

44,657

 

 

$

5,064

 

 

$

49,721

 

 

$

61,469

 

 

$

13,881

 

 

$

75,350

 

Financial Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

1,283

 

 

 

1,283

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee deferred compensation

   plan liability

 

 

 

 

 

41,457

 

 

 

41,457

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,452

 

 

 

43,452

 

Total financial liabilities

 

$

 

 

$

42,740

 

 

$

42,740

 

 

$

 

 

$

43,452

 

 

$

43,452

 

78


Valuation Techniques:

·

Level 1—includes instruments for which quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. The Company’s financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include U.S. treasuries, money market funds, marketable equity securities and our employee deferred compensation plan assets.

·

Level 2—includes instruments for which the valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level 2 instruments include certain U.S. government securities, commercial paper, corporate notes and bonds and our employee deferred compensation plan liabilities.  Foreign currency forward contracts are classified as Level 2 because the valuation inputs are based on observable market data of similar instruments. The Company principally executes its foreign currency contracts in the retail market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants and the Company’s counterparties are large money center banks and regional banks. The valuation inputs for the Company’s foreign currency contracts are based on observable market data from public data sources (specifically, forward points, LIBOR rates, volatilities and credit default rates at commonly quoted intervals) and do not involve management judgment.

·

Level 3—includes instruments for which the valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. As of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, the Company did not own any financial assets utilizing Level 3 inputs.

The Company determines the basis of the cost of a security sold orassets, less estimated selling costs, and determined the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings using the specific identification method.  

There were no material  transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value hierarchies during fiscal 2015 and 2014.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain of the Company’s assets, including intangible assets, goodwill and cost-method investments, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis if impairment is indicated.

As of January 3, 2016,was lower than the carrying value of the Company’s senior secured revolving lineassets. As a result, based on this analysis the Company recorded an impairment charge of credit was $449.0 million. The fair value of the Company’s line of credit approximates its fair value since it bears an interest rate that is similar$37.2 million during fiscal 2016 to existing market rates.

The Company's 2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes assumed as part of the Merger is traded in the market and is categorized as Level 2. The carrying value and thewrite these assets down to their estimated fair value, less selling costs.


The sales of the debt portionwafer fabrication facility in Minnesota and the sale of the Notes asbuilding in Austin were completed during the first quarter of January 3, 2016 is $131.8 million and $279.6 million respectively. See Note 14 for further details.

Investments in Equity Securities

Privately-held equity investments are accounted for underfiscal 2017. During the cost method ifyear ended December 31, 2017, the Company has less than 20 % ownership interest,recorded a gain of $1.2 million resulting from the change in the estimated costs to sell these assets. This gain was recorded in selling, general and it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operationsadministrative line item of the privately-held companies.Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s total investments in equity securities accounted for underCompany completed the cost method included long-term investments in non-marketable equity securities (investments in privately-held companies) are $9.2 millionsale of both of these asset groups during the year ended December 31, 2017 and $5.9 million, asreceived gross proceeds from the sales of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, respectively.

$35.5 million.


NOTE 6. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
Privately-held equity investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting if the Company has an ownership interest of 20% or greater or if it has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of such companies.  

The below table presents the privately-held companies.  The Company’s total investmentschanges in equity securities accounted for underthe carrying value of the equity method investments.

  As of December 31, 2017
  (In thousands)
  Deca Technologies Inc. ("Deca") Enovix Corporation ("Enovix") Total
Carrying value as of January 3, 2016 $
 $41,330
 $41,330
Fair value at change in basis of accounting 142,508
 
 142,508
Additional investment 
 23,000
 23,000
Equity in net loss of equity method investees (8,181) (9,970) (18,151)
Carrying value as of January 1, 2017 134,327
 54,360
 188,687
Additional investment 
 5,600
 5,600
Equity in net loss of equity method investees (11,813) (8,773) (20,586)
Impairment in investment 
 (51,187) (51,187)
Carrying value as of December 31, 2017 $122,514
 $
 $122,514

The following table presents summarized aggregate financial information derived from the respective consolidated financial statements of accounting are $41.3 millionDeca and $20.5 millionEnovix.



  Year Ended
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
  (in thousands)
Operating data:    
Revenue $15,500
 $15,529
Gross loss (8,964) (13,555)
Loss from operations (44,415) (44,401)
Net loss (43,589) (44,881)
Net loss attributable to Cypress $(20,586) $(18,151)

The following table represents the assets and liabilities held by Deca and Enovix as of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, respectively.

In February 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a company that designs, develops and manufactures products in the area of advanced battery storage for mobile consumer devices. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company has so far purchased $56.0 million of preferred voting stock from the company and has committed to purchase additional preferred stock in a series of subsequent closings subject to certain performance milestones that must be fulfilled within a defined and agreed-upon timeline. In fiscal 2016, the Company plans to make investments subject to the attainment of certain milestones and the timing of additional capital requests which could vary substantially. As of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, the Company owned 38.7 % and 26.2% respectively, of the company. Since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the company accounts for its investment in the company under the equity method of accounting.

79


The remaining privately-held equity investments are accounted for under the cost method and are periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary declines in fair value

During fiscal 2013, the Company sold its equity investment in one publicly traded company for $2.2 million and recognized a gain of $1.1 million in “Other income (expense), net”.

In fiscal 2014, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 6.9 million ordinary shares of Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited (HHSL) for an aggregate price of $10.0 million in connection with their initial public offering. HHSL is the parent company of Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, which is one of the Company’s strategic foundry partners.  The Company recorded an unrealized loss on its investment in HHSL’s ordinary shares of $4.7 million and $1.5 million in "Other income (expense), net" as a result of the decline in the fair market value of the investment as of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, respectively.

1, 2017.


 For the Year Ended
 December 31, 2017January 1, 2017
 (in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:  
    Current Assets$70,101
$90,842
    Long-term Assets$55,673
$45,686
    Current Liabilities$15,615
$10,764
    Long-term Liabilities$1,859
$2,906

The Company’s investments are periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary declines in fair value by considering available evidence, including general market conditions, financial condition, pricing in recent rounds of financing, if any, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance and any other readily available market data.

NOTE 6.  INVESTMENTS

Available-For-Sale Securities


Deca Technologies Inc.
On July 29, 2016, Deca, a majority owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a share purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), whereby certain third-party investors purchased 41.1% of the shares outstanding at the said date for an aggregate consideration of approximately $111.4 million. Concurrently, Deca repurchased certain of its preferred shares from Cypress.
After giving effect to the above transactions, the Company's ownership in Deca was reduced to 52.2% as of July 29, 2016. As a consequence of the substantive rights afforded to third-party new investors in the Purchase Agreement, including, among other things, participation on the Board of Directors of Deca, the approval of operating plans, approval of indebtedness, the Company determined that it no longer has the power to direct the activities of Deca that most significantly impact Deca's economic performance. However, since the Company continues to have significant influence over Deca's financial and Other Investments

operating policies, effective July 29, 2016, the investment in Deca is being accounted for as an equity method investment and is no longer a consolidated subsidiary. The carrying value of this equity method investment as of July 29, 2016 was determined based on the fair value of the equity in Deca, which was estimated to be $142.5 million. This represents the Company's remaining investment in Deca immediately following tables summarize the Company’s available-for-sale securitiesinvestments by the third-party investors. As a result of the change in the method of accounting for the Company's investment in Deca from consolidation to the equity method of accounting, the net carrying value of the assets and other investments:

liabilities related to Deca, and the adjustments related to the recognition of the initial fair value of the equity method investment resulted in a gain of $112.8 million which has been reflected as "Gain related to investment in Deca Technologies Inc." in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

 

As of January 3, 2016

 

 

As of December 28, 2014

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Reported as cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

119

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

119

 

 

$

7,665

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,665

 

Total cash equivalents

 

 

119

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

7,665

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,665

 

Reported as short-term investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate notes and bonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,616

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

5,599

 

Federal agency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

3,615

 

U.S. treasuries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,002

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

4,993

 

Commercial paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

871

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

869

 

Total short-term investments

 

 

871

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

15,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28

)

 

 

15,076

 

Total available-for-sale securities and

   other investments

 

$

990

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

990

 

 

$

22,769

 

 

$

 

 

$

(28

)

 

$

22,741

 


As

The Company held 52.5% of Deca's outstanding voting shares as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017.

Enovix Corporation



In 2017, the Company completed its investment commitment in Enovix of $85.1 million per the original agreement dated February 22, 2012. Certain third-party investors made additional investments in Enovix in 2017, as a result of which the Company's ownership in Enovix decreased from 46.6% as of January 3, 2016,1, 2017 to 41.2% as of December 31, 2017.

During the contractual maturitiesfourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company determined that its investment in Enovix, which is accounted for as an equity method investment, was other-than temporarily impaired as it did not achieve certain key planned product development milestones. The Company considered various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the expectations of the Company’s available-for-sale investmentsinvestee's future cash flows and certificatescapital needs, the length of deposit were as follows (the table below does not include our investmentstime the investee has been in marketablea loss position, the ability to achieve milestones, and the near-term prospect of the investee and its exit strategy. Enovix’s estimated enterprise value is sensitive to its ability to achieve these milestones. Consequently, the Company recognized a charge of $51.2 million in order to write down the carrying amount of the investment to zero. This amount was recorded in "Share in net loss and impairment of equity securities):

 

 

Cost

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Maturing within one year

 

$

990

 

 

$

990

 

Total

 

$

990

 

 

$

990

 

Realized gains and realized losses from salesmethod investees” in the Consolidated Statements of available-for-sale in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 were not material.

80


Operations.


NOTE 7. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Fixed Assets

During fiscal 2014,FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017:
 As of December 31, 2017 As of January 1, 2017
 Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total
 (In thousands)
Financial Assets 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash equivalents: 
  
  
  
  
  
Money market funds$20,477
 $
 $20,477
 $287
 $
 $287
Other current assets: 
  
  
  
  
  
Certificates of deposit
 972
 972
 
 972
 972
Total Cash equivalents and other current assets20,477
 972
 21,449
 287
 972
 1,259
Employee deferred compensation plan assets: 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash equivalents3,561
 
 3,561
 3,809
 
 3,809
Mutual funds27,321
 
 27,321
 22,658
 
 22,658
Equity securities12,994
 
 12,994
 11,974
 
 11,974
Fixed income3,415
 
 3,415
 4,088
 
 4,088
Stable Value Funds

 2,204
 2,204
 
 3,045
 3,045
Total employee deferred compensation plan assets47,291
 2,204
 49,495
 42,529
 3,045
 45,574
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
 1,197
 1,197
 
 6,605
 6,605
Total financial assets$67,768
 $4,373
 $72,141
 $42,816
 $10,622
 $53,438
Financial Liabilities 
  
  
  
  
  
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
 1,426
 1,426
 
 15,582
 15,582
Employee deferred compensation
   plan liability
48,425
 2,204
 50,629
 43,314
 3,045
 46,359
Total financial liabilities$48,425
 $3,630
 $52,055
 $43,314
 $18,627
 $61,941

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:


Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company's financial assets and financial liabilities that require recognition under the guidance generally include available-for-sale investments, employee deferred compensation plans and foreign currency derivatives. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company's assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. As such, fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

Level 1—includes instruments for which quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. The Company’s financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include U.S. treasuries, money market funds, marketable equity securities and our employee deferred compensation plan assets.
Level 2—includes instruments for which the valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level 2 instruments include certain equipment which had beenU.S. government securities, commercial paper, corporate notes and bonds and our employee deferred compensation plan liabilities.  Foreign currency forward contracts are classified as heldLevel 2 because the valuation inputs are based on observable market data of similar instruments. The Company principally executes its foreign currency contracts in the retail market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants and the Company’s counterparties are large money center banks and regional banks. The valuation inputs for salethe Company’s foreign currency contracts are based on observable market data from public data sources (specifically, forward points, LIBOR rates, volatilities and credit default rates at commonly quoted intervals) and do not involve management judgment.
Level 3—includes instruments for which the valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. As of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, the Company did not own any material financial assets utilizing Level 3 inputs on a recurring basis.

The Company determines the basis of the cost of a security sold or the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings using the specific identification method.  
There were no material transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value hierarchies during fiscal 2017 and 2016.
There were no unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities as of 2017, 2016 and 2015. Realized gains and realized losses from sales of available-for-sale in fiscal 20132017, 2016 and 2015 were not material.

As of December 31, 2017, the contractual maturities of the Company’s available-for-sale investments and certificates of deposit were less than a year.

In December 2017, the Company entered into fixed-for-floating interest rate forward swap agreements with two counter parties, to swap variable interest payments on certain debt for fixed interest payments. In fiscal 2017, the gross asset and liability at fair value was sold resulting in a gain of $0.6 million. During fiscal 2013, we incurred a $6.7 million restructuring charge to write down this equipmentand the net impact to the then currentConsolidated Statement of Operations was immaterial. See Note 11 of the Note to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail discussion.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain of the Company’s assets, including intangible assets, goodwill and cost-method investments, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis if impairment is indicated.


As of $2.3 million.

NOTE 8.EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company’s equity incentive plans are broad-based, long-term programs intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests.

The Company currently hasDecember 31, 2017, the following employee stock plans:

1999 Stock Option Plan (“1999 Plan”):

The 1999 Plan expired in March 2009. There are currently no shares available for grant under the 1999 Plan. Under the 1999 Plan 2.0 million shares are issued and outstanding. Any outstanding shares cancelled or forfeited under the 1999 Plan will not be available for any future grants since the 1999 Plan expired.

2013 Stock Option Plan (“2013 Plan”):

At the 2013 Annual Shareholders Meeting,carrying value of the Company’s shareholders approved the extensionSenior Secured Revolving Facility was $90.0 million (See Note 14). The carrying value of the 1994 Stock PlanCompany's Senior Secured Revolving Facility approximates its fair value since it bears an interest rate that is comparable to January 15, 2024rates on similar credit facilities and renamed the plan as the 2013 Stock Plan. is determined using Level 2 inputs.

The 2013 Plan provides for (1) the discretionary granting of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs"), Restricted Stock Awards ("RSAs") or Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") to Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors, which Options may be either Incentive Stock Options (for Employees only) or NonstatutoryStock Options, as determined by the Administrator at the time of grant; and (2) the grant of Nonstatutory Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock or RSUs to Outside Directors pursuant to an automatic, non-discretionary formula. Options or awards granted under the 2013 Stock Plan generally expire over terms not exceeding eight years from the date of grant, subject to earlier termination upon the cessation of employment or service of the recipients. The maximum aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2013 Stock Plan is 145.2 million shares. As of January 3, 2016, 25.0 million options or 13.3 million RSUs and RSAs were available for grant under the 2013 Stock Plan. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, in connection with the Merger, Cypress’ the shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares issuable under the Cypress 2013 Stock Plan by 29.3 million shares that could be issued as full value awards (such as restricted stock units (RSUs), and performance stock units (PSUs)), or as appreciation awards (such as stock options and/or stock appreciation rights)(if awards are granted only in the form of RSUs or other full value awards, this increase in shares would allow for the issuance of only up to 15.6 million shares, to a total of 31.0 million reserved but unissued shares under the 2013 Stock Plan).

2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan (“2010 Plan”)

In connection with the Company’s Merger withCompany's 2% 2020 Spansion itExchangeable Notes assumed their 2010 Plan, as amended, which reserves a total of 10.1 million shares of common stock for issuance under stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance awards, stock payments, dividend equivalents and deferred stock to its employees, consultants and non-employee members of its Board of Directors. The 2010 Plan provides that incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. All stock options expire if not exercised by the seventh anniversary of the grant date. Annual RSU awards granted generally vest over a period of two to four years. Options granted become exercisable in full or in installments pursuant to the terms of each agreement evidencing options granted. The exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock and restricted stock units is satisfied by issuing authorized common stock or treasury stock. Shares that are subject to or underlie awards that expire or for any reason are cancelled, terminated or forfeited, or fail to vest will again be available for grant under the 2010 Plan. Grants from this plan are limited to employees who joined Cypress as part of the Merger is traded in the secondary market and grants to new Cypress employees.  As of January 3, 2016, 10.1 million shares of stock options or RSUs and RSAs were available for grant under the 2010 Plan.

81


2012 Incentive Award Plan (“2012 Plan”):

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Ramtron in 2012, it assumed their 2012 Plan,is categorized as amended, which reserves a total of 1.2 million shares of common stock for issuance under stock option or restricted stock grants.Level 2. The exercise price of all non-qualified stock options must be no less than 100%principal of the fair market value on the effective date of the grant under the 2012 Plan,Notes and the maximum term of each grant is seven years. The 2012 Plan permits the issuance of incentive stock options, the issuance of restricted stock, and other types of awards. Restricted stock grants generally vest five years from the date of grant. Options granted become exercisable in full or in installments pursuant to the terms of each agreement evidencing options granted. The exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock and restricted stock units is satisfied by issuing authorized common stock or treasury stock. Grants from this plan are limited to employees who joined Cypress as part of the Ramtron acquisition and grants to new Cypress employees. As of January 3, 2016, 2 thousand shares of stock options or RSUs and RSAs were available for grant under the 2012 Plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) :

At the 2013 Annual Shareholders Meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved an extension of the ESPP Plan to May 10, 2023. The Company’s ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions. The ESPP contains consecutive 18 -month offering periods composed of three six -month exercise periods. The shares can be purchased at the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at the date of commencement of the offering period or at the last day of each six -month exercise period. Purchases are limited to 10% of an employee’s eligible compensation, subject to a maximum annual employee contribution limit of $21,250. As of January 3, 2016 1.7 million shares were available for future issuance under the ESPP.

Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense by line item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

16,459

 

 

$

13,209

 

 

$

12,789

 

Research and development

 

 

25,719

 

 

 

16,187

 

 

 

26,042

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

51,349

 

 

 

20,774

 

 

 

34,189

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

93,527

 

 

$

50,170

 

 

$

73,020

 

In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed stock options and full value awards originally granted by Spansion. Stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2015 included $21.6 million related to assumed Spansion stock options and RSUs respectively.

As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The accounting guidance requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Consolidated cash proceeds from the issuance of shares under the employee stock plans were $52.9 million, $32.0 million and $43.3 million for fiscal 2015, fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. No income tax benefit was realized from stock option exercises for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013. As of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014 stock-based compensation capitalized in inventories totaled $4.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

82


The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense by type of awards:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

$

1,920

 

 

$

4,717

 

 

$

8,747

 

Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards

 

 

74,897

 

 

 

37,837

 

 

 

54,359

 

ESPP

 

 

16,710

 

 

 

7,616

 

 

 

9,914

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

93,527

 

 

$

50,170

 

 

$

73,020

 

The following table summarizes the unrecognized stock-based compensation balance, net of estimated forfeitures, by type of awards as of January 3, 2016:

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-Average

Amortization

Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In years)

 

Stock options

 

$

2,631

 

 

 

1.27

 

Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards

 

 

82,087

 

 

 

1.57

 

ESPP

 

 

18,364

 

 

 

0.67

 

Total unrecognized stock-based compensation balance,

   net of estimated forfeitures

 

$

103,082

 

 

 

1.40

 

Valuation Assumptions

The Company estimates the fair value of its stock-based equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model were as follows:

Year Ended

January 3,

2016

December 28,

2014

December 29,

2013

Stock Option Plans:

Expected life

4.4-5.7 years

4.2-5.3 years

Volatility

39.7%-41.1%

38.2%-41.9%

Risk-free interest rate

0.26%-1.75%

0.93%-1.85%

Dividend yield

4.2%-4.4%

3.8%-4.5%

ESPP:

Expected life

0.5-1.5 years

0.5-1.5 years

0.5-1.5 years

Volatility

35.9%-46.6%

31.0%-36.1%

38.4%-46.3%

Risk-free interest rate

0.09%-0.86%

0.03%-0.35%

0.08%-0.32%

Dividend yield

4.5%-5.2%

4.2%-4.4%

3.8%-4.5%

Expected life: Expected life is based on historical exercise patterns, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the awards and vesting schedules. In addition, employees who display similar historical exercise behavior are grouped separately into two classes (executive officers and other employees) in determining the expected life.

Volatility: The Company determined that implied volatility of publicly traded call options and quotes from option traders is more reflective of market conditions and, therefore, can reasonably be a better indicator of expected volatility than historical volatility. Therefore, volatility is based on a blend of historical volatility of the Company’s common stock and implied volatility.

Risk-free interest rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

Dividend yield: The expected dividend is based on the Company’s history and expected dividend payouts.

83


Employee Equity Award Activities

As of January 3, 2016, 35.1 million stock options, or 23.4 million RSUs/PSUs, were available for grant under the 2013 Stock Plan, the 2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan (formerly the Spansion 2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan) and the 2012 Incentive Award Plan (formerly the Ramtron Plan).

Stock Options:

As a part of the Merger, Cypress assumed all outstanding Spansion options and these options were converted into options to purchase Cypress common stock at the agreed upon conversion ratio. The exercise price per share for each assumed Spansion option is equal to exercise price per share of Spansion option divided by 2.457.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activities:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3, 2016

 

 

December 28, 2014

 

 

December 29, 2013

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

per Share

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Options outstanding, beginning of year

 

 

14,463

 

 

$

9.24

 

 

 

19,060

 

 

$

8.33

 

 

 

22,760

 

 

$

7.25

 

Options assumed as a part of the Merger

 

 

8,976

 

 

$

12.86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

522

 

 

$

10.24

 

 

 

4,122

 

 

$

11.40

 

Exercised

 

 

(5,391

)

 

$

5.71

 

 

 

(4,027

)

 

$

4.47

 

 

 

(5,622

)

 

$

5.19

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(1,208

)

 

$

12.75

 

 

 

(1,092

)

 

$

11.59

 

 

 

(2,200

)

 

$

11.09

 

Options outstanding, end of year

 

 

16,840

 

 

$

7.99

 

 

 

14,463

 

 

$

9.24

 

 

 

19,060

 

 

$

8.33

 

Options exercisable, end of year

 

 

14,366

 

 

$

7.40

 

 

 

9,787

 

 

$

8.05

 

 

 

12,346

 

 

$

6.39

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $2.22 per share for options granted in fiscal 2014 and $2.63 per share in options granted during fiscal 2013.  The Company did not grant any new stock options during 2015.

The aggregate intrinsic value of the options outstanding and options exercisable as of January 3, 2016 was $48.1 and $47.9 million respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of January 3, 2016 and does not include substantial tax payments.

The aggregate intrinsic value of the options outstanding and options exercisable as of December 28, 2014 was $82.8 million and $68.0 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of December 28, 2014 and does not include substantial tax payments.

The aggregate pre-tax intrinsic value of option exercises, which represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of Cypress common stock at the time of exercise, was $41.8 million in fiscal 2015, $26.4 million in fiscal 2014 and $31.9 million in fiscal 2013.

The aggregate grant date fair value of the options which vested in fiscal 2015, fiscal 2014 and 2013 was $5.6 million $6.9principal as of December 31, 2017 is $22.0 million and $10.1$66.4 million respectively.

84


See Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

The following table summarizes information about options outstandingCompany’s 4.50% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes are traded in the secondary market and exercisableits fair value is determined using Level 2 inputs. The principal of the Notes and the estimated fair value as of January 3, 2016:

December 31, 2017, were $287.5 million and $378.1 million, respectively. See
Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise Price

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price per

Share

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price per

Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2.72-$3.99

 

 

1,821,541

 

 

 

0.81

 

 

$

3.57

 

 

 

1,812,477

 

 

$

3.57

 

$4.01-$4.09

 

 

1,815,277

 

 

 

3.01

 

 

$

4.09

 

 

 

1,815,277

 

 

$

4.09

 

$4.15-$4.22

 

 

173,644

 

 

 

0.51

 

 

$

4.17

 

 

 

173,644

 

 

$

4.17

 

$4.28-$4.28

 

 

1,981,218

 

 

 

1.35

��

 

$

4.28

 

 

 

1,981,218

 

 

$

4.28

 

$4.30-$6.17

 

 

2,162,508

 

 

 

2.80

 

 

$

5.44

 

 

 

2,150,857

 

 

$

5.44

 

$6.22-$8.10

 

 

2,112,745

 

 

 

2.11

 

 

$

7.61

 

 

 

2,112,745

 

 

$

7.61

 

$8.43-$10.92

 

 

1,133,060

 

 

 

4.38

 

 

$

9.97

 

 

 

697,698

 

 

$

9.90

 

$11.27-$11.27

 

 

1,812,686

 

 

 

4.87

 

 

$

11.27

 

 

 

1,072,597

 

 

$

11.27

 

$11.32-$11.40

 

 

181,205

 

 

 

3.02

 

 

$

11.33

 

 

 

167,965

 

 

$

11.33

 

$11.55-$23.23

 

 

3,645,837

 

 

 

4.54

 

 

$

13.67

 

 

 

2,381,600

 

 

$

14.50

 

 

 

 

16,839,721

 

 

 

3.04

 

 

$

7.99

 

 

 

14,366,078

 

 

$

7.40

 

The total numberCompany’s 2.00% 2023 Exchangeable Notes are traded in the secondary market and its fair value is determined using Level 2 inputs. The principal of exercisable in-the-money options was 8.4 million sharesthe Notes and the estimated fair value of the principal as of January, 2016.

As of January 3, 2016, stock options vestedDecember 31, 2017, were $150.0 million and expected to vest totaled  16.6$159.8 million, shares, with a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 3.0 years and a weighted-average exercise price of $7.95 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value was $48.0  million.

Restricted Stock Units, Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards:

The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit and restricted stock award activities:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3, 2016

 

 

December 28, 2014

 

 

December 29, 2013

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

per Share

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Non-vested, beginning of year

 

 

7,838

 

 

$

10.98

 

 

 

8,652

 

 

$

11.97

 

 

 

7,887

 

 

$

14.52

 

Granted and assumed

 

 

10,172

 

 

$

14.78

 

 

 

6,344

 

 

$

10.16

 

 

 

7,040

 

 

$

11.40

 

Released

 

 

(3,594

)

 

$

5.60

 

 

 

(4,363

)

 

$

11.58

 

 

 

(2,378

)

 

$

9.77

 

Forfeited

 

 

(3,363

)

 

$

11.66

 

 

 

(2,795

)

 

$

11.21

 

 

 

(3,897

)

 

$

14.74

 

Non-vested, end of year

 

 

11,053

 

 

$

13.43

 

 

 

7,838

 

 

$

10.98

 

 

 

8,652

 

 

$

11.97

 

Of the total awards granted and assumed in 2015, 3.2 million awards were performance-based units granted for the performance-based restricted stock program (PARS) for 2015, 1.6 million awards were service-based units granted under the 2015 PARS program, which employees are eligible to earn 100% if they remain an employeerespectively. See Note 14 of the Company through specified dates between fiscal 2016 and 2018, and 23 thousand awards were granted to individuals subjectNotes to the achievement of specific milestones. Of the total awards granted in 2014, 2.6 million awards were performance-based units grantedConsolidated Financial Statements for the 2014 PARS program, 0.6 million awards were service-based units granted under the 2014 PARS programfurther details.

NOTE 8. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
Accounts Receivable, net
 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Accounts receivable, gross$301,465
 $338,061
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns(5,474) (5,024)
Accounts receivable, net$295,991
 $333,037
Inventories

 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Raw materials$15,635
 $15,525
Work-in-process176,427
 208,525
Finished goods80,065
 63,726
Total inventories$272,127
 $287,776
Other Current Assets


 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Prepaid tooling$21,132
 $21,687
Restricted cash996
 4,206
Advance to suppliers15,968
 16,549
Prepaid royalty and licenses16,630
 17,769
Derivative assets1,197
 6,605
Value added tax receivable11,412
 11,625
Receivable from sale of TrueTouch®Mobile business

 10,000
Prepaid expenses17,737
 22,965
Withholding tax receivable and tax advance5,790
 3,384
Other current assets12,775
 7,372
Total other current assets$103,637
 $122,162
Property, Plant and 0.3 million awards were granted to individuals subject to the achievement of specific milestones.  Of the total awards granted in 2013, 4.6 million awards were performance-based units granted for the 2013 PARS program and 0.2 million awards were granted to individuals subject to the achievement of specific milestones.

85


Of the total awards released in 2015, 0.6 million and 0.5 million awards were released for the performance-based units and service-based units, respectively granted under the 2014 PARS program and 0.2 million shares were released to individuals who achieved the specific milestones set upon grant. Of the total awards released in 2014, 2.4 million awards were released for the performance-based units granted under the 2013 PARS program and 46 thousand shares were released to individuals who achieved the specific milestones set upon grant.  Of the total awards released in 2013, 1.0 million awards were released for the 2012 PARS program and 0.1 million shares were released to individuals who achieved the specific milestones set upon grant.  

A portion of the non-vested balance as of January 3, 2016 included 5.3 million units for the PARS programs.  These PARS were issued to certain senior-level employees in fiscal 2014 and 2015 and can be earned ratably over a period of one to three years, subject to the achievement of certain milestones that were set by the Compensation Committee in advance.  Any share not earned due to not achieving the full performance milestone are forfeited and returned to the pool.

The PSUs and RSUs under Cypress’s 2015 PARS Program were granted by the Company in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2015 with an extended measurement period of three years. These awards were issued to certain senior-level employees and the PSU portion of the award can be earned over a period of one to three years, subject to the achievement of certain performance milestones that were set by the Compensation Committee in advance. Each participating employee is given a target number of PSUs under each milestone, which can be earned independent of the outcomes of other milestones. Any portion of PSUs not earned due to not achieving the performance milestone is forfeited and returned to the pool. The following milestones for the 2015 PSUs were approved by the Compensation Committee:

·       Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Factor, for the applicable measurement period of one, two and three years as compared to a group of peer companies chosen by the Compensation Committee. If the Company ranks in the 65th percentile of peers, 100% of the target PSUs is earned by employees. If the Company exceeds a 65th percentile ranking, employees can earn as high as 200% of the target RSUs. If the Company ranks in the 25th percentile or less, no PSUs are earned by employees under this milestone. If TSR is negative for the measurement period, only 50% of target PSUs are earned.

·       Realization of an annualized target Merger synergy over the three year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2017. Employees are eligible to earn their target PSUs if the cost synergies associated with the Merger achieves the stated goal for each of the years between fiscal 2015 and 2017. The payouts under this milestone are adjusted on a linear scale between the 0% payout and the 100% payout and then between the 100% payout to 200% maximum payout, depending on the achievement of synergy savings target as specified in the grant agreement.

·Achievement of target non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS). Employees are eligible to earn their target PSUs if the Company achieves the target non-GAAP EPS for the specified periods. The payouts under this milestone are adjusted on a linear scale between the 0% payout and the 100% payout and then between the 100% payout to 200% maximum payout, depending on the achievement of this milestone. The measurement period will be for the Company’s reported non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2015 and 2016 as well as an annual non-GAAP EPS for fiscal 2017.

The three milestones for the 2014 PARS Program, as approved by the Compensation Committee, were as follows:

·

Milestone #1-our Chief Executive Officer’s annual goals, or CSFs. The CEO CSFs represent the action items that are most critical to the Company’s short- and long-term success. In order for a participant to earn 100% of the shares underlying Milestone #1, our CEO had to obtain 85 points or greater under the CEO CSFs and achievement then scaled down linearly to 0% of shares earned if the CEO CSF score was less than 60 points.

Equipment, Net

·

Milestone #2-required the Company to achieve a specific revenue amount during fiscal year 2015. In order for a participant to earn 100% of the RSUs underlying Milestone #2, the Company had to achieve a specific revenue amount level in fiscal year 2015 which scaled down linearly to 0% of the shares earned if the dollar value of the specific revenue amount was less than target.

·

Milestone #3-required the participant to remain employed through January 30, 2016. 75% of Milestone #3 targeted PARS vest on January 30, 2015 and the remaining 25% will vest on January 30, 2016.

 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Land$29,813
 $29,844
Equipment559,573
 493,498
Buildings, building and leasehold improvements174,559
 175,589
Construction in progress17,836
 36,066
Furniture and fixtures5,117
 6,728
Total property, plant and equipment, gross786,898
 741,725
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization(497,344) (444,459)
Total property, plant and equipment, net$289,554
 $297,266

Both Milestones #1 and #2 were multiplied by a Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Factor, for the applicable milestone performance period as compared to the performance of a Peer Group of Companies as detailed in our 2014 Proxy. The TSR factor which adjusted on a linear scale was .625 if Cypress was at the 10th or lower rank order percentile, 1.0 if Cypress was in the 40th and 60th rank percentile and 1.375 if Cypress was at the 90th or higher rank order percentile.

ESPP:

During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company issued 2.6 million, 1.5 million and 1.5 million shares under its ESPP with weighted-average price of $8.69, $8.93 and $9.21 per share, respectively.


Other Long-term Assets
 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Employee deferred compensation plan$49,495
 $45,574
Investments in cost method equity securities17,017
 13,331
Deferred tax assets4,293
 4,463
Long-term licenses8,654
 14,498
Advances to suppliers11,315
 25,207
Deposit - non-current9,830
 4,698
Pension - non-current8,026
 6,792
Prepaid tooling and other non-current assets38,409
 33,379
Total other long-term assets$147,039
 $147,942


Other Current Liabilities
 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Employee deferred compensation plan$50,629
 $46,359
Restructuring accrual - current portion (see Note 10)9,580
 24,029
Derivative liability2,033
 15,582
Accrued expenses47,789
 67,933
Accrued interest8,094
 10,422
Customer advances12,873
 332
Other current liabilities12,487
 15,641
Total other current liabilities$143,485
 $180,298
Other Long-Term Liabilities
 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Long-term pension and other employee-related liabilities$16,779
 $14,672
Restructuring accrual - non-current portion (see Note 10)8,596
 11,294
Asset retirement obligation5,693
 5,067
Other long-term liabilities4,374
 5,716
Total other long-term liabilities$35,442
 $36,749

NOTE 9. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Accounts Receivable, Net

EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Accounts receivable, gross

 

$

295,803

 

 

$

79,091

 

Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns

 

 

(3,067

)

 

 

(3,107

)

Accounts receivable, net

 

$

292,736

 

 

$

75,984

 

The Company’s equity incentive plans are broad-based, long-term programs intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests.

Inventories

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Raw materials

 

$

13,516

 

 

$

4,753

 

Work-in-process

 

 

192,245

 

 

 

64,003

 

Finished goods

 

 

37,834

 

 

 

19,471

 

Total inventories

 

$

243,595

 

 

$

88,227

 

The Company currently has the following employee stock plans:

Total inventories include gross inventory

1999 Stock Option Plan (“1999 Plan”):
The 1999 Plan expired in March 2009. There are currently no shares available for grant under the 1999 Plan. Under the 1999 Plan 0.6 million shares are issued and outstanding. Any outstanding shares cancelled or forfeited under the 1999 Plan will not be available for any future grants since the 1999 Plan has expired.
2013 Stock Option Plan (“2013 Plan”):
At the 2013 Annual Shareholders Meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved the extension of $385.2the 1994 Stock Plan to January 15, 2024 and renamed the plan as the 2013 Stock Plan. The 2013 Plan provides for (1) the discretionary granting of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs"), Restricted Stock Awards ("RSAs") or Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") to Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors, which Options may be either Incentive Stock Options (for Employees only) or Nonstatutory Stock Options, as determined by the Administrator at the time of grant; and (2) the grant of Nonstatutory Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock or RSUs to Outside Directors pursuant to an automatic, non-discretionary formula. Options or awards granted under the 2013 Stock Plan generally expire over terms not exceeding eight years from the date of grant, subject to earlier termination upon the cessation of employment or service of the recipients. The maximum aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2013 Stock Plan is 203.6 million shares. As of December 31, 2017, 44.3 million options or 23.6 million RSUs and RSAs were available for grant under the 2013 Stock Plan. At the annual shareholder meeting on June 20, 2017, Cypress' shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares


issuable under the Cypress 2013 Stock Plan by 29.1 million shares that could be issued as full value awards (such as restricted stock units (RSUs), and performance stock units (PSUs)), or an appreciation awards (such as stock options and/or stock appreciation rights) (if awards are granted only in the form of RSUs or other full value awards, this increase in shares would allow for the issuance of only up to 15.5 million shares, to a total of 31.0 million reserved but unissued shares under the 2013 Stock Plan.
2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan (“2010 Plan”)
In connection with the Company’s Merger with Spansion, it assumed their 2010 Plan, as amended, which reserves a total of 16.0 million shares of common stock for issuance under stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance awards, stock payments, dividend equivalents and deferred stock to its employees, consultants and non-employee members of its Board of Directors. The 2010 Plan provides that incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. All stock options expire if not exercised by the seventh anniversary of the grant date. Annual RSU awards granted generally vest over a period of two to four years. Options granted become exercisable in full or in installments pursuant to the terms of each agreement evidencing options granted. The exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock and restricted stock units is satisfied by issuing authorized common stock or treasury stock. Shares that are subject to or underlie awards that expire or for any reason are canceled, terminated or forfeited, or fail to vest will again be available for grant under the 2010 Plan. Grants from this plan are limited to employees who joined Cypress as part of the Merger and grants to new Cypress' employees.  As of December 31, 2017, 2.7 million shares of stock options or RSUs and RSAs were available for grant under the 2010 Plan.
2012 Incentive Award Plan (“2012 Plan”):
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Ramtron in 2012, it assumed their 2012 Plan, as amended, which reserves a total of 1.2 million shares of common stock for issuance under stock option or restricted stock grants. The exercise price of all non-qualified stock options must be no less than 100% of the fair market value on the effective date of the grant under the 2012 Plan, and the maximum term of each grant is seven years. The 2012 Plan permits the issuance of incentive stock options, the issuance of restricted stock, and other types of awards. Restricted stock grants generally vest five years from the date of grant. Options granted become exercisable in full or in installments pursuant to the terms of each agreement evidencing options granted. The exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock and restricted stock units is satisfied by issuing authorized common stock or treasury stock. Grants from this plan are limited to employees who joined Cypress as part of the Ramtron acquisition and grants to new Cypress employees. As of December 31, 2017, 154 thousand shares of stock options or 101 thousand RSUs and RSAs were available for grant under the 2012 Plan.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”):
At the 2013 Annual Shareholders Meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved an extension of the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP Plan”) to May 10, 2023. The Company’s amended and restated ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions. The ESPP contains consecutive 18 months offering periods composed of three six months exercise periods. The shares can be purchased at the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at the date of commencement of the offering period or at the last day of each six -month exercise period. Purchases are limited to 10% of an employee’s eligible compensation, subject to a maximum annual employee contribution limit of $21,250. Starting January 1, 2018, the Company is changing its offering period from 18 months to six months composed of one six-month exercise period. The employees currently enrolled in the ESPP program will have a transition period wherein their ESPP benefit will continue on the old plan. As of December 31, 2017, 2.2 million shares were available for future issuance under the ESPP.
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense by line item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations:


 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
Cost of revenues$15,606
 $17,971
 $13,766
Research and development36,803
 38,189
 21,918
Selling, general and administrative39,172
 42,353
 48,006
Total stock-based compensation expense$91,581
 $98,513
 $83,690
Aggregate cash proceeds from the issuance of shares under the employee stock plans were $47.2 million, $43.9 million and inventory provisions$52.9 million for fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. No income tax benefit was realized from stock option exercises for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015. As of $141.6 million as ofDecember 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016.  Total1, 2017 stock-based compensation capitalized in inventories include gross inventory of $121.8totaled $3.3 million and inventory provisions$4.6 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense by type of $33.5 millionawards:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
Stock options$163
 $700
 $1,920
Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards82,946
 85,170
 74,897
ESPP8,472
 12,643
 6,873
Total stock-based compensation expense$91,581
 $98,513
 $83,690
The following table summarizes the unrecognized stock-based compensation balance, net of estimated forfeitures, by type of awards as of December 28, 2014.  31, 2017:
(In thousands)  
Weighted-Average
Amortization
Period
   (In years)
Stock options$123
 0.60
Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards67,870
 1.47
ESPP4,104
 0.78
Total unrecognized stock-based compensation balance, net of estimated forfeitures$72,097
 1.43
During fiscal 2016, the Company, as part of the severance agreement executed with the former CEO and severance agreements with two other executives, accelerated the vesting of certain awards previously granted and modified the vesting conditions. Included in the stock-based compensation expense for the year ended January 3, 2016,1, 2017 is an amount of $4.3 million related to the impact of the said modifications.

Valuation Assumptions
The Company recorded $133 millionestimates the fair value of provisions to write down inventory assumedits stock-based equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model were as follows:


Year Ended
December 31,
2017
January 1,
2017
January 3,
2016
ESPP:
Expected life0.5-1.5 years0.5-1.5 years0.5-1.5 years
Volatility34.8%-38.1%36.9%-38.5%35.9%-46.6%
Risk-free interest rate0.65%-1.28%0.37%-0.61%0.09%-0.86%
Dividend yield3.22%-3.87%4.1%4.5%-5.2%
Expected life: The expected term represents the average term from the Mergerfirst day of the offering period to the purchase date.
Volatility: The Company determined that implied volatility of publicly traded call options and quotes from option traders on its common stock is more reflective of market conditions and, therefore, can reasonably be a better indicator of expected volatility than historical volatility. Therefore, volatility is based on a blend of historical volatility of the Company’s common stock and implied volatility.
Risk-free interest rate:The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Dividend yield:The expected dividend is based on the Company’s history, and expected dividend payouts.
Employee Equity Award Activities
As of December 31, 2017, 47.2 million stock options, or 26.4 million RSUs/PSUs, were recognized asavailable for grant under the 2013 Stock Plan, the 2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan (formerly the Spansion 2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan) and the 2012 Incentive Award Plan (formerly the Ramtron Plan).
Stock Options:
As a part of the Company's strategyMerger, Cypress assumed all outstanding Spansion options and these options were converted into options to focus on high margin, profitable business as a combined companypurchase Cypress common stock at the agreed upon conversion ratio. The exercise price per share for each assumed Spansion option is equal to exercise price per share of Spansion option divided by 2.457.
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activities:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Options outstanding, beginning of year7,947
 $10.70
 16,840
 $7.99
 14,463
 $9.24
Options assumed as a part of the Merger
 $
 
 $
 8,976
 $12.86
Exercised(2,898) $8.80
 (8,255) $5.03
 (5,391) $5.71
Forfeited or expired(422) $13.58
 (638) $12.54
 (1,208) $12.75
Options outstanding, end of year4,627
 $11.63
 7,947
 $10.70
 16,840
 $7.99
Options exercisable, end of year4,340
 $11.66
 6,736
 $10.62
 14,366
 $7.40

There were no options granted during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and to move away from the production and sale of inventory associated with non-strategic business.

Other Current Assets

2015.

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Prepaid tooling assets

 

$

19,379

 

 

$

3,880

 

Restricted cash relating to pension plan (see Note 17)

 

 

3,730

 

 

 

 

Foundry service prepayments - ST

 

 

5,753

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

30,934

 

 

 

17,897

 

Other current assets

 

 

27,084

 

 

 

7,511

 

Total other current assets

 

$

86,880

 

 

$

29,288

 

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Land

 

$

37,819

 

 

$

18,570

 

Equipment

 

 

1,191,469

 

 

 

1,017,121

 

Buildings, building and leasehold improvements

 

 

314,017

 

 

 

221,465

 

Construction in progress

 

 

28,050

 

 

 

12,093

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

 

12,946

 

 

 

6,902

 

Total property, plant and equipment, gross

 

 

1,584,301

 

 

 

1,276,151

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(1,159,298

)

 

 

(1,038,388

)

Total property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

425,003

 

 

$

237,763

 

87


Other Long-term Assets

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Employee deferred compensation plan

 

$

41,249

 

 

$

44,116

 

Investments in Equity securities

 

 

57,030

 

 

 

34,992

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

4,080

 

 

 

1,187

 

Long term license

 

 

24,079

 

 

 

4,633

 

Restricted cash relating to pension plan (see Note 17)

 

 

3,462

 

 

 

 

Long term receivable from sale of TrueTouch ®

   Mobile business (see Note 3)

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

Foundry service prepayments - LT

 

 

26,237

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

34,272

 

 

 

8,665

 

Total other long-term assets

 

$

200,409

 

 

$

93,593

 

Other Current Liabilities

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Employee deferred compensation plan

 

$

41,457

 

 

$

43,452

 

Restructuring accrual - ST (see Note 10)

 

 

7,270

 

 

 

1,177

 

License commitment

 

 

18,496

 

 

 

 

Deferred Revenue on sale of TrueTouch® mobile business

   (see Note 3)

 

 

15,295

 

 

 

 

Deferred liability - distributor price adjustments

 

 

52,712

 

 

 

19,618

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

67,175

 

 

 

30,372

 

Total other current liabilities

 

$

202,405

 

 

$

94,619

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Long-term pension liabilities

 

$

8,712

 

 

$

5,768

 

Restructuring accrual - LT (see Note 10)

 

 

14,217

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

14,855

 

 

 

4,925

 

Total other long-term liabilities

 

$

37,784

 

 

$

10,693

 

Sale of Spansion's Sunnyvale property

On January 23, 2014, Spansion sold its property in Sunnyvale, California, consisting of 24.5 acres of land with approximately 471,000 square feet of buildings that included its headquarters building and submicron development center, a Pacific Gas & Electric transmission facility and a warehouse building, for net consideration of $59.0 million. Spansion concurrently leased back approximately 170,000 square feetThe aggregate intrinsic value of the headquarters building on a month-to-month basis withoptions outstanding and options exercisable as of December 31, 2017 was $19.2 million and $18.0 million respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value



which would have been received by the option to continue the lease for up to 24 months; thereafter, either party could terminate the lease. holders had all option holders exercised their options as of December 31, 2017 and does not include substantial tax payments.
The first six monthsaggregate intrinsic value of the lease were rent free; thereafter,options outstanding and options exercisable as of January 1, 2017 was $12.9 million and $12.5 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the rents were lower than the market rates. For accounting purposes, these rents were deemed tototal pre-tax intrinsic value which would have been netted againstreceived by the sale proceedsoption holders had all option holders exercised their options as of January 1, 2017 and represent prepaid rent. As such,does not include substantial tax payments.
The aggregate pre-tax intrinsic value of option exercises, which represents the usedifference between the exercise price and the value of Cypress common stock at the time of exercise, was $16.2 million in fiscal 2017, $46.0 million in fiscal 2016 and $41.8 million in fiscal 2015.
The aggregate grant date fair value of the property after its sale constituted continuing involvementoptions which vested in fiscal 2017, 2016, and recognition2015 was $2.7 million, $3.5 million and $5.6 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2017:
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise PriceShares 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
 (in thousands) (In years)   (in thousands)  
$2.72-$11.553,583
 2.75 $10.12
 3,320
 $10.07
$11.58-$17.77695
 1.54 $15.39
 672
 $15.47
$18.86-$21.63299
 1.80 $19.06
 298
 $19.06
$22.88-$22.8842
 1.04 $22.88
 42
 $22.88
$23.23-$23.238
 1.52 $23.23
 8
 $23.23
 4,627
 2.49 $11.63
 4,340
 $11.66
The total number of exercisable in-the-money options was 3.6 million shares as of December 31, 2017.
Restricted Stock Units, Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards:
The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit, performance-based restricted awards and restricted stock award activities:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
per Share
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
per Share
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
per Share
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Non-vested, beginning of year13,780
 $11.83
 11,053
 $13.43
 7,838
 $10.98
Granted and assumed6,488
 $13.40
 11,318
 $11.19
 10,172
 $14.78
Released(6,248) $12.17
 (5,890) $13.36
 (3,594) $5.60
Forfeited(2,044) $12.22
 (2,701) $12.36
 (3,363) $11.66
Non-vested, end of year11,976
 $12.44
 13,780
 $11.83
 11,053
 $13.43
On March 16, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the saleCompany approved the issuance of service-based and performance-based restricted stock units under the property was deferred untilCompany's Performance Accelerated Restricted Stock Program ("PARS") to certain employees.


The milestones for the lease period ends. In2017 PARS grants include service and performance conditions including revenue growth, gross margin, profit before tax, debt leverage and strategic initiatives milestones.
The milestones for the third quarter2016 PARS Program, as approved by the Compensation Committee included service condition and performance conditions linked to the Company's total shareholder return (TSR) relative to its peers, achievement of Spansion merger synergies, achievement of non-GAAP earnings per share and margin and certain product development milestones.
The milestones for the 2015 PARS Program, as approved by the Compensation Committee included service condition and performance conditions related to the Company's TSR relative to its peers, achievement of Spansion merger synergies and achievement of non-GAAP earnings per share.
ESPP:
During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company terminated the lease on the Sunnyvale buildingissued 2.4 million, 1.2 million and recognized an immaterial gain.

88


2.6 million shares under its ESPP with weighted-average price of $8.48, $8.34 and $8.69 per share, respectively.


NOTE 10. RESTRUCTURING


2017 Restructuring Plan

In December 2017, the Company began implementation of a reduction in workforce ("2017 Plan") which will result in elimination of approximately 80 positions worldwide across various functions. The restructuring charge of $6.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 consists of personnel costs.

2016 Restructuring Plan

In September 2016, the Company began implementation of a reduction in workforce ("2016 Plan") which resulted in elimination of approximately 430 positions worldwide across various functions. The restructuring charge of $2.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 consists of personnel costs and facilities related charges. The personnel costs related to the 2016 plan during the year ended January 1, 2017 were $26.3 million.

Spansion Integration-Related Restructuring Plan


In March 2015, the Company began the implementation of plannedimplemented cost reduction and restructuring activities in connection with the Merger. As part of this plan, the Company expects to eliminate approximately 1,000 positions from the combined workforce across all business and functional areas on a global basis. The restructuring charge of $90.1 million recorded for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016 primarily consists of severance costs, lease termination costs and impairment of property, plant and equipment. The lease termination costs include approximately $18$18.0 million relating to the buildings Spansion had leased prior to the Merger, which the Company decided not to occupy in the post-merger period. The initial term of the lease commenced on January 1, 2015 and will expire on December 31, 2026.


During fiscal 2016, a release of previously estimated personnel related liability of $0.1 million was recorded. No charges were recorded during fiscal 2017 for the Spansion Integration Plan.



Summary of Restructuring Costs

The following table summarizes the restructuring charges recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations forOperations:
 Year Ended
 (In thousands)
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Personnel Costs$7,479
 26,131
 $58,972
Lease termination costs and other related charges540
 
 18,016
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
 
 12,531
Other1,069
 
 565
Total restructuring and other charges$9,088
 $26,131
 $90,084

All restructuring costs are included in the periods presented pursuant tooperating expenses under "Restructuring costs" in the Spansion Integration-Related Restructuring Plan:

Consolidated Statement of Operations.

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Personnel costs

 

$

58,972

 

Lease termination costs and other related charges

 

 

18,016

 

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

 

 

12,531

 

Other

 

 

565

 

Total restructuring and other charges

 

$

90,084

 


Roll-forward of the restructuring reserves

Restructuring activity under the Spansion Integration – Related Restructuring Plan during fiscal year ended January 3, 2016:

Company's various restructuring plan was as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Accrued restructuring balance as of December 28, 2014

 

$

 

Provision

 

 

81,041

 

Cash payments and other

 

 

(59,554

)

Accrued restructuring balance as of January 3, 2016

 

$

21,487

 


 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017
 (In thousands)
 2017 Plan 2016 Plan Spansion Integration plan Total
Provision$
 $
 $81,041
 $81,041
Cash payments and other adjustments
 
 (59,554) (59,554)
Accrued restructuring balance as of January 3, 2016
 
 21,487
 21,487
Provision
 26,261
 (130) 26,131
Cash payments and other adjustments
 (5,157) (7,138) (12,295)
Accrued restructuring balance as of January 1, 2017
 21,104
 14,219
 35,323
Provision6,464
 2,624
 
 9,088
Cash payments and other adjustments(325) (22,985) (2,922) (26,232)
Accrued restructuring balance as of December 31, 2017$6,139
 $743
 $11,297
 $18,179

The provision for restructuring expense in the table aboverecorded during fiscal 2015 does not include thea charge of $9.0 million related to write off certain leasehold improvements fromduring the first quarter of 2015, which totaled $9.0 million.

2015.


The Company anticipates that the remaining restructuring accrual balance will be paid out in cash through the first quarter of 2016fiscal 2018 for employee terminations and over the remaining lease term through 2026 for the excess lease obligation.

NOTE 11. FOREIGN CURRENCY AND INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES

The Company enters into multiple foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain operational exposures resulting from movementsfluctuations in Japanese yen and euroEuro exchange rates. The Company does not enter into derivative securities for speculative purposes. The Company’s hedging policy is designed to mitigate the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movementsfluctuations on its operating results. Some foreign currency forward contracts are considered to be economic hedges that arewere not designated as hedging instruments while others arewere designated as cash flow hedges. Whether designated or undesignated as cash flow hedges or not, these forward contracts protect the Company against the variability of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from revenues, expenses and net asset or liability positions designated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The maximum


original duration of any contract allowable under the Company’s hedging policy is thirteen months.

89


months for foreign currency hedging contracts.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company enters into cash flow hedges to protect non-functional currency revenues, inventory purchases and certain other operational expenses, in addition to its on-going program of cash flow hedges to protect its non-functional currency revenues against variability in cash flows due to foreign currency fluctuations. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts that were designated as cash flow hedges have maturities between three and nine months. All hedging relationships are formally documented, and the hedges are designed to offset changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions at the inception of the hedge. The Company recognizes derivative instruments from hedging activities as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures them at fair value on a monthly basis. The Company records changes in the intrinsic value of its cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, until the forecasted transaction occurs. Interest charges or “forward points” on the forward contracts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are recorded in other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. When the forecasted transaction occurs, the Company reclassifies the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue or costs, depending on the risk hedged. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income to other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations at that time.

The Company evaluates hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge prospectively as well as retrospectively and records any ineffective portion of the hedge in other income (expense), net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

At January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, the Company had net outstanding forward contracts to buy ¥2,690.0¥3,335 million for $22.7$298 million.

Non-designated hedges

Total notional amounts of net outstanding contracts were as summarized below.  The duration or each contract is approximately thirty days:

Buy / Sell

December 31, 2017

January 3, 2016

1, 2017

(in millions)

US dollar / Japanese Yen

$19.4 / ¥2,333

US dollar / EUR

$7.3/€6.8

7.4 / €8.8
$25.0 / €23.6
Japanese Yen / US dollar ¥3,046 / $27.2 ¥10,129 / $87.9

Interest rate swaps

In December 2017, the Company entered into fixed-for-floating interest rate forward swap agreements starting in April 2018 with two counterparties, to swap variable interest payments on certain debt for fixed interest payments; these agreements will expire in July 2021. The objective of the swaps was to effectively fix the interest rate at current levels without having to refinance the outstanding term loan, thereby avoiding the incurrence of transaction costs. The interest rate on the variable debt will continue to float until it becomes fixed in April 2018. As of December 31, 2017, these swaps were not designated as hedging instruments and the aggregate notional amount of these interest rate swaps was $300 million. The gross asset and liability at fair value was $0.6 million and the net impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations was immaterial. Subsequent to year-end, on January 3, 2018, the Company has evaluated the hedge effectiveness of the interest rate swaps and has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges of the debt. Upon designation as hedge instruments, future changes in fair value of these swaps will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The gross fair values of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 were as follows:


  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Balance Sheet location Derivatives designated as hedging instruments Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Derivatives designated as hedging instruments Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
  (in thousands)
Other Current Assets  
  
  
  
Derivative Asset $805
 $392
 $6,468
 $137
         
Non-current Assets        
Derivative Asset $
 $607
 $
 $
         
Other Current Liabilities  
  
  
  
Derivative Liability $775
 $1,258
 $14,391
 $1,191

NOTE 12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components of Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:

 

 

Accumulated net

unrealized losses on

available-for-sale

investments

 

 

Cumulative

translation

adjustment and

other

 

 

Unrecognized

Gain on the Defined Benefit Plan

 

 

Accumulated

other

comprehensive

loss (income)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance as of December 29, 2013

 

$

(183

)

 

$

6

 

 

$

 

 

$

(177

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before

   reclassification

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

Balance as of December 28, 2014

 

$

(52

)

 

$

6

 

 

$

 

 

$

(46

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before

   reclassification

 

 

(1,623

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,623

)

Amounts reclassified to earnings

 

 

1,416

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,416

 

Net unrecognized gain on the Defined

   Benefit Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

26

 

Balance as of January 3, 2016

 

$

(259

)

 

$

6

 

 

$

26

 

 

$

(227

)

90


 Accumulated net
unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
investments and other
 Unrecognized
Gain on the Defined Benefit Plan
 Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss (income)
 (in thousands)
Balance as of January 3, 2016$(253) $26
 $(227)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
   reclassification
(5,186) 
 (5,186)
Amounts reclassified to other income (expense), net(2,184) $
 (2,184)
Net unrecognized gain (loss) on the defined
   benefit plan

 (1,214) (1,214)
Balance as of January 1, 2017(7,623) (1,188) (8,811)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
   reclassification
511
 
 511
Amounts reclassified to other income (expense), net6,614
 
 6,614
Net unrecognized gain (loss) on the defined
   benefit plan

 324
 324
Balance as of December 31, 2017$(498) $(864) $(1,362)

NOTE 13.  OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

The following table summarizes the components of “other income (expense), net,” recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Interest income

 

$

885

 

 

$

362

 

 

$

301

 

Changes in fair value of investments under the

   deferred compensation plan

 

 

(1,354

)

 

 

3,014

 

 

 

6,371

 

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

 

 

(4,655

)

 

 

(1,495

)

 

 

 

Impairment of investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net

 

 

744

 

 

 

1,382

 

 

 

2,791

 

Gain on sale of equity investments

 

 

276

 

 

 

 

 

 

908

 

Other

 

 

335

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

(59

)

Other income (expense), net

 

$

(3,769

)

 

$

3,303

 

 

$

10,337

 



 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
Interest income$568
 $1,836
 $885
Changes in fair value of investments under the deferred compensation plan6,087
 2,326
 (1,354)
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities
 325
 (4,655)
Foreign currency exchange (losses) gains, net(1,838) (4,251) 744
(Loss) gain on sale of investments
 (265) 276
Other(549) 342
 335
Other income (expense), net$4,268
 $313
 $(3,769)
NOTE 14. DEBT AND EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

Debt is comprised of the following:

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital lease obligations

 

$

6,603

 

 

$

3,227

 

Equipment loans

 

 

3,003

 

 

 

2,916

 

Term Loan A

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

14,606

 

 

 

6,143

 

Revolving credit facility and long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit facility

 

 

449,000

 

 

 

227,000

 

Term Loan A

 

 

92,228

 

 

 

 

2% Senior Exchangeable Notes

 

 

131,845

 

 

 

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

586

 

 

 

7,105

 

Equipment loans

 

 

 

 

 

3,002

 

Revolving credit facility and long-term debt

 

 

673,659

 

 

 

237,107

 

Total debt

 

$

688,265

 

 

$

243,250

 

  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
  (in thousands)
Current portion of long-term debt  
Credit Facility:    
Term Loan A $
 $7,500
Term Loan B 27,303
 22,500
Equipment loans and capital lease obligations 
 152
Current portion of long-term debt 27,303
 30,152
Credit facility and long-term portion of debt  
  
Credit Facility    
Senior Revolving Credit Facility 90,000
 332,000
Term Loan A 
 84,838
Term Loan B 468,080
 406,214
2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes 20,375
 135,401
4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes 246,636
 236,526
2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes 131,422
 
Credit facility and long-term debt 956,513
 1,194,979
Total debt $983,816
 $1,225,131
2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes

On November 6, 2017, the Company, issued at face value, $150.0 million of Senior Exchangeable Notes due in 2023 (the “2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes”) in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes are governed by an Indenture (“2017 Indenture”), dated November 6, 2017, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. The 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes will mature on February 1, 2023 unless earlier repurchased or converted, and bear interest of 2% per year payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, commencing on February 1, 2018. The 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes may be due and payable immediately in certain events of default.
The 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable at an initial exchange rate of 46.7099 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price of approximately $21.41 per share) subject to adjustments for anti-dilutive issuances and make-whole adjustments upon a fundamental change. A fundamental change includes a change in control, delisting of the Company’s stock and liquidation, consolidation or merger of the Company. Prior to November 1, 2022, the 2% 2023 Exchangeable


Notes will be exchangeable under certain specified circumstances as described in the 2017 Indenture.  On or after November 1, 2022, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes will be convertible in multiples of $1,000 principal amount regardless of the foregoing circumstances.  
Upon conversion, the Company may pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, at its election. If the Company satisfies its conversion obligation solely in cash or through payment and delivery, as the case may be, of a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, the amount of cash and shares of common stock, if any, due upon conversion will be based on a pre-defined conversion value.
It is the Company’s intent that upon conversion, the Company would pay the holders of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes cash for an amount up to the aggregate principal amount of the Notes. If the conversion value exceeds the principal amount, the Company intends to deliver shares of its common stock in respect to the remainder of its conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount (“conversion spread”). Accordingly, for the purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, there would be no adjustment to the numerator in the net income per common share computation for the portion of the Notes that are intended to be cash settled. The conversion spread will be included in the denominator for the computation of diluted net income per common share, using the treasury stock method.
In accordance with ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the Company separated the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the estimated fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. Such amount was based on the contractual cash flows discounted at an appropriate market rate for non-convertible debt at the date of issuance, which was determined to be 89.7% of the par value of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes or $134.6 million. The carrying amount of the equity component of $15.5 million representing the conversion option was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the face value of the Exchangeable Notes as a whole. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount ("debt discount") is accreted to interest expense over the term of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes using the effective interest method. The equity component is not re-measured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.
The Company incurred transaction costs of approximately $4.1 million relating to the issuance of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes.  The transaction costs of $4.1 million include $3.4 million of financing fees paid to the initial purchasers of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes, and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. In accounting for these costs, the Company allocated the costs of the offering in proportion to the fair value of the debt and equity recognized in accordance with the accounting standards. The transaction costs allocated to the debt component of approximately $3.7 million are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes using the effective yield method. The transaction costs allocated to the equity component of approximately $0.4 million were recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.  
At the debt issuance date, the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes, net of issuance costs, consisted of the following (in thousands):
  November 6, 2017
Liability component  
Principal $134,550
Less: Issuance cost (3,678)
Net carrying amount $130,872
Equity component  
Allocated amount $15,450
Less: Issuance cost (422)
Net carrying amount $15,028
Exchangeable Notes, net of issuance costs $145,900



The following table includes total interest expense related to the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
  Year ended December 31, 2017
Contractual interest expense $452
Amortization of debt issuance costs 106
Accretion of debt discount 444
Total $1,002

The 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Equity component (1) $15,028
 $
Liability component:    
  Principal $150,000
 $
  Less debt discount and debt issuance costs, net (2) (18,578) 
    Net carrying amount $131,422
 $
(1) Included in the consolidated balance sheets within additional paid-in-capital
(2) Included in the consolidated balance sheets within Credit facility and long-term debt and is amortized over the remaining life of the 2% 2023 Exchangeable Notes.
4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes
On June 23, 2016, the Company, issued at face value, $287.5 million of Senior Exchangeable Notes due in 2022 (the “4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes”) in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes are governed by an Indenture (“2016 Indenture”), dated June 23, 2016, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. The 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes will mature on January 15, 2022, unless earlier repurchased or converted, and bear interest of 4.50% per year payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing on January 15, 2017. The 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes may be due and payable immediately in certain events of default.
The 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable for an initial exchange rate of 74.1372 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price of approximately $13.49 per share) subject to adjustments for anti-dilutive issuances and make-whole adjustments upon a fundamental change. A fundamental change includes a change in control, delisting of the Company’s stock and liquidation, consolidation or merger of the Company. Prior to October 15, 2021, the Notes will be exchangeable under certain specified circumstances as described in the 2016 Indenture.  On or after October 15, 2021, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes will be convertible in multiples of $1,000 principal amount regardless of the foregoing circumstances.  
Upon conversion, the Company may pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, at its election. If the Company satisfies its conversion obligation solely in cash or through payment and delivery, as the case may be, of a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, the amount of cash and shares of common stock, if any, due upon conversion will be based on a pre-defined conversion value.
It is the Company’s intent that upon conversion, the Company would pay the holders of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes cash for an amount up to the aggregate principal amount of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes. If the conversion value exceeds the principal amount, the Company intends to deliver shares of its common stock in respect to the remainder of its conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount (“conversion spread”). Accordingly, for the purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, there would be no adjustment to the numerator in the net income per common share computation for the portion of the 4.5%


2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes intended to be settled in cash. The conversion spread will be included in the denominator for the computation of diluted net income per common share, using the treasury stock method.

At the debt issuance date, the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, net of issuance costs, consisted of the following (in thousands):

 June 23, 2016
Liability component 
Principal$238,338
Less: Issuance cost(7,158)
Net carrying amount$231,180
Equity component 
Allocated amount$49,163
Less: Issuance cost(1,477)
Net carrying amount$47,686
Exchangeable Notes, net of issuance costs$278,866

The following table includes total interest expense related to the Notes recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
  Year ended
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Contractual interest expense $13,009
 $6,900
Amortization of debt issuance costs 1,289
 700
Accretion of debt discount 8,885
 4,646
Total $23,183
 $12,246

The 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes consisted of the following December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 (in thousands):
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Equity component (1) $47,686
 $47,686
Liability component:    
  Principal $287,500
 $287,500
  Less debt discount and debt issuance costs, net (2) (40,864) (50,974)
    Net carrying amount $246,636
 $236,526
(1) Included in the consolidated balance sheets within additional paid-in-capital
(2) Included in the consolidated balance sheets within Credit facility and long-term debt and is amortized over the remaining life of the 4.5% 2022 Exchangeable Notes.

Capped Calls, 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes
In connection with the issuance of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes, the Company entered into capped call transactions with certain bank counterparties to reduce the risk of potential dilution of the Company’s common stock upon the exchange of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes. The capped call transactions have an initial strike price of approximately $13.49 and an initial cap price of approximately $15.27, in each case, subject to adjustment. The capped calls are intended to reduce the potential dilution and/or offset any cash payments the Company is required to make upon conversion of the 4.5% 2022 Senior Exchangeable Notes if the market price of the Company's common stock is above the strike price of the capped calls. If, however, the market price of the Company’s common stock is greater than the cap price of the capped calls, there would be dilution and/or no offset


of such potential cash payments, as applicable, to the extent the market price of the common stock exceeds the cap price. The capped calls expire in January 2022.

2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes

Pursuant to the Merger, Cypress assumed 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes ("Spansion Notes") on March 12, 2015. The Spansion Notes are governed by a Supplemental Indenture, dated March 12, 2015, between the Company, Spansion and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. They are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company. The Spansion Notes will mature on September 1, 2020, unless earlier repurchased or converted, and bear interest of 2% per year payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1, commencing on March 1, 2014. The Spansion Notes may be due and payable immediately in certain events of default.

As of December 31, 2017, the Spansion Notes are exchangeable for 198.16 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Spansion Notes (equivalent to an exchange price of $5.05) subject to adjustments for dividends, anti-dilutive issuances and make-whole adjustments upon a fundamental change. A fundamental change includes a change in control, delisting of the Company’s stock and liquidation, consolidation or merger of the Company. According to the Indenture, a change in control occurs when a person or group becomes the beneficial owner directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Company’s common stock. In the case of a consolidation or merger, if the surviving entity continues to be listed, no change of control will be triggered. Prior to June 1, 2020, the Spansion Notes will be exchangeable under certain specified circumstances as described in the Indenture.

Upon conversion, the Company may pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, at its election. If the Company satisfies its conversion obligation solely in cash or through payment and delivery, as the case may be, of a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, the amount of cash and shares of common stock, if any, due upon conversion will be based on a pre-defined conversion value.

It is Company’s intent that upon conversion, the Company would pay the holders of the Spansion Notes cash for an amount up to the aggregate principal the Spansion Notes. If the conversion value exceeds the principal amount, the Company intends to deliver shares of its common stock in respect to the remainder of its conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount (“conversion spread”). Accordingly, for the purposes of calculation of diluted earnings per share, there would be no adjustment to the numerator in the net income per common share computation for the portion of the Notes intended to be settled in cash. The conversion spread, will be included in the denominator for the computation of diluted net income per common share, using the treasury stock method.

On November 1, 2017, the Company entered into a privately negotiated agreement to induce the extinguishment of a portion of the Spansion Notes. The Company paid the holders of the Spansion Notes cash for the aggregate principal of $128 million and delivered 17.3 million shares of common stock for the conversion spread. The Company recorded $4.3 million in loss on extinguishment, which included $1.2 million paid in cash as an inducement premium and a reduction in additional paid-in capital of $290.6 million towards the deemed repurchase of the equity component of the notes. The loss on extinguishment is recorded in "Interest Expense" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 13 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

The following table presents the interest expense recognized on the Spansion Notes during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017January 1, 2017
 (in thousands)
Contractual interest expense at 2% per annum$2,880
$2,989
Accretion of debt discount3,149
3,556
Total$6,029
$6,545


The 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 (in Thousands):
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Equity component (1) $42,130
 $287,362
Liability component:    
   Principal $21,990
 $149,990
   Less debt discount and debt issuance costs, net (2) (1,615) (14,589)
     Net carrying amount $20,375
 $135,401
(1) Included in the consolidated balance sheets within additional paid-in-capital
(2) Included in the consolidated balance sheets within Credit facility and long-term debt and is amortized over the remaining life of the 2% 2020 Exchangeable Notes.

Capped Calls, 2% 2020 Spansion Exchangeable Notes
In connection with the Spansion Notes, Spansion had entered into capped call transactions in fiscal 2013 with certain bank counterparties to reduce the potential dilution to their common stock upon exchange of the Spansion Notes. In March 2015, the Company and the counterparties agreed to terminate and unwind the capped calls and the Company received a cash settlement of $25.3 million which has been the fair value of the capped call assumed as a part of the Merger and recorded as an increase to additional paid-in-capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 3, 2016.

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility,

On March 12, 2015, the Company amended and restated its existing senior secured revolving credit facility ("Credit Facility") and increased the size of the Credit Facility from $300 million to $450 million. The restated agreement also contains an option permitting the Company to arrange additional commitments of $250 million (“Incremental Availability”) and specifies that the proceeds of these loans may be used for working capital, acquisitions, stock repurchases and general corporate purposes. The borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest, at the Company's option, at an adjusted base rate plus a spread of 1.25%, or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread of 2.25%. The borrowings under the Credit Facility are collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. The financial covenants were amended to include the following conditions: 1) maximum total leverage ratio of 3.50 to 1.00 through January 1, 2017, and 3.00 to 1.00 thereafter, 2) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00. At January 3, 2016, the Company's outstanding borrowings of $449.0 million were recorded as part of long-term liabilities and are presented as “Long-term revolving credit facility and long term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  The Company incurred financing costs of $2.3 million to the new lenders of the Credit Facility which has been capitalized and recognized in other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the life of the Credit Facility.

91


Term Loan A, Term Loan B


As per the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company entered into a Joinder Agreement on December 22, 2015 under which the Company borrowed an additional $100 million (“Term Loan A”). Term Loan A is subject to, at the Company’s option, either an interest rate equal to (i) 3.25% over LIBOR or (ii) an interest rate equal to 2.25% over the greater of (x) the prime lending rate published by the Wall Street Journal, (y) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, and (z) the LIBOR rate for a one month interest period plus 1%. The Company paid a 1.00% upfront fee in connection with the Term Loan A. Such Term Loan A is payable in quarterly installments equal to 1.25% per quarter for 2016, 1.875% per quarter for 2017 and 2018, and 2.50% per quarter thereafter, with the remaining outstanding principle amount due at final maturity on March 12, 2020. It may be voluntarily prepaid at the Company’s option and is subject to mandatory prepayments equal to (i) 50% of excess cash flow, as defined in the agreement, (stepping down to 25% and 0% based on a decrease in total leverage ratio over time) at the end of each fiscal year, (ii) the net cash proceeds from certain asset sales (subject to certain reinvestment rights) and (iii) the proceeds from any debt issuances not otherwise permitted under the Credit Agreement.  The Company incurred financing costs of $2.8 million to the lenders of Term Loan A which have been capitalized and recognized as a deduction of the Term Loan A balance in “Credit facility and long term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On January 6, 2016, subsequent to fiscal 2015, the Company entered into an Incremental Revolving Joinder Agreement to its existing Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility to increase the amount of revolving commitments under the Credit Facility by an additional $90 million. The total aggregate amount of revolving commitments under the Credit Facility starting January 6, 2016 is $540 million.
On April 27, 2016, the Company amended and restated the borrowings under the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company's option, at an adjusted base rate plus a spread of 1.25%, or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread of 2.25%. The borrowings under the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain present and future wholly-owned material domestic subsidiaries of the Company (the “Guarantors”) and are secured by a security interest in substantially all assets of the Company and the Guarantors. The financial covenants include the following conditions: 1) maximum total leverage ratio of 4.50x through October 2016, 4.25x until January 1, 2017, 4.00 x until April 2, 2017 and 3.75x thereafter, and 2) minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00x. The Company incurred financing costs of $2.6 million related to the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility which has been capitalized and recognized in other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the life of the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility and recorded in “Interest Expense” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

On July 5, 2016, the Company entered into a Joinder and Amendment Agreement with the guarantors' party thereto, the initial incremental term loan lenders party thereto and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative


agent and collateral agent. The Joinder Agreement supplements the Company’s existing Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2015, by and among the Company, the guarantors, the lenders, the Agent, and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as issuing bank and others.
The Joinder and Amendment Agreement provides for the incurrence by the Company of an incremental term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million (“Term Loan B”). The incurrence of Term Loan B is permitted as an incremental loan under the Credit Agreement and is subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement and to additional terms set forth in the Joinder and Amendment Agreement. Term Loan B will initially bear interest at (i) an adjusted LIBOR rate loan plus an applicable margin of 5.50% or (ii) an adjusted base rate loan plus an applicable margin of 4.50%. Following the delivery of the Compliance Certificate and the financial statements for the period ending the last day of the third Fiscal Quarter of 2016, Term Loan B shall bear interest, at the Company’s option, at (i) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of either 5.25% or 5.50%, or (ii) an adjusted base plus an applicable margin of either 4.25% or 4.50%, with the applicable margin in each case determined based on the Company’s total net leverage ratio for the trailing twelve month period ended as of the last day of the Company’s most recently ended fiscal quarter. The Company paid an upfront fee to the initial incremental lenders in an amount equal to 1.5% of the aggregate principal amount of the Incremental Term Loan funded. The Company is required to pay a prepayment premium of 1% of the principal amount prepaid if it prepays the Incremental Term Loan in certain circumstances prior to the date that is twelve months after the Closing Date. Term Loan B was fully funded on the Closing Date and matures on July 5, 2021.The Company incurred financing costs of $11.5 million to the lenders of Term Loan B which has been capitalized and recognized as a deduction of the Term Loan AB balance in “Long-term revolving credit facility and long term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the life of Term Loan A.

B and recorded in “Interest Expense” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

On February 17, 2017, the Company amended its Credit Facility. The amendment reduced the applicable margins on the Term Loan B and Term Loan A from 5.50% and 5.11%, respectively, to 3.75% effective February 17, 2017. Additionally, the amended financial covenants include the following conditions: 1) maximum total leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.00 through December 31, 2017 and 2) maximum total leverage ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 through July 1, 2018 and 3.75 to 1.00 thereafter. The Company incurred financing costs of $5.9 million to lenders of the Term Loans which were capitalized and recognized as a reduction of the Term Loan A and Term Loan B balances in “Credit facility and long term debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the life of the Term Loans and are recorded in “Interest Expense” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
On April 7, 2017, the Company amended its Credit Facility,Facility. The amendment reduced the applicable margins on the Company's Term Loan A from 3.75% to 2.75% effective April 7, 2017. The Company incurred financing costs of $0.4 million to lenders of Term Loan A which were recognized as amended, provides for a $450 million revolvingreduction of the Term Loan A balance in “Long-term credit facility and generally containslong term debt” on the same representationsConsolidated Balance Sheet.
On August 18, 2017, the Company amended its Credit Facility. As a result of the amendment, Term Loan A borrowing of $91.3 million was extinguished as a separate borrowing. Term Loan B was increased by $91.3 million to replace Term Loan A (the "Additional Incremental Term Loan"). Previously unamortized debt issuance costs of $3.0 million related to Term Loan A were written off and warranties, covenants, and eventsrecorded as "Interest expense" in the Consolidated Statements of default that it contained priorOperations in fiscal 2017. The additional incremental term loan is subject to the effectivenessterms of the Amendment.Credit Agreement and the additional terms set forth in the amendment. The Amendment did not changeamendment also reduced the interest rate or maturity applicable margins on Term Loan B from 3.75% to 2.75% effective August 18, 2017. The Company incurred financing costs of $0.6 million to the Credit Facility and the Credit Facility remains guaranteed by certain present and future wholly-owned material domestic subsidiarieslenders of the Company (the “Guarantors”)Term Loans which have been capitalized and secured byrecognized as a security interest in substantially all assetsreduction of the CompanyTerm Loan B balances in “Credit facility and long term debt” on the Guarantors.

On January 6, 2016, subsequent to fiscal 2015,Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will be amortized over the Company entered into an Incremental Revolving Joinder Agreement to its Credit Facility to increase the amount of revolving commitments under our Credit Facility by an additional $90 million. The total aggregate amount of revolving commitments under the Credit Facility starting January 6, 2016 is $540 million.

The proceedslife of the loans made underTerm Loans and are recorded in “Interest Expense” on the Credit Facility may be used for working capital, acquisitions, stock repurchases and general corporate purposes. Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As January 3, 2016, $549of December 31, 2017, $601.9 million aggregate principal amount of loans, includingloan, which is related to Term Loan A, and letters of credit areB, is outstanding under the Credit Facility and none of the Incremental Availability has been used.

Facility.

As of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the Credit Facility.

2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes

Pursuant to the Merger, Cypress assumed Spansion's 2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes (the Notes) on March 12, 2015. The Notes are governed by a Supplemental Indenture, dated March 12, 2015, between

Capital Leases and Equipment Loans
In 2011, the Company Spansionentered into capital lease agreements which allowed it to borrow up to $35.0 million to finance the acquisition of certain manufacturing equipment. Assets purchased under all capital leases are included in “Property, plant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. They are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company. The Notes will mature on September 1, 2020, unless earlier repurchased or converted, and bear interest of 2.00% per year payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1, commencing on March 1, 2014. The Notes may be due and payable immediately in certain events of default.

As of January 3, 2016, the Notes are exchangeable for 184.068 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes (equivalent to an exchange price of $5.43) subject to adjustments for dividends, anti-dilutive issuances and make-whole adjustments upon a fundamental change. A fundamental change includes a change in control, delisting of the Company’s stock and liquidation, consolidation or merger of the Company. According to the Indenture, a change in control occurs when a person or group becomes the beneficial owner directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Company’s common stock. In the case of a consolidation or merger, if the surviving entity continues to be listed, no change of control will be triggered. Prior to June 1, 2020, the Notes will be exchangeable under certain specified circumstances as described in the Indenture.

The Notes were valued as of March 12, 2015 as a part of the Merger and the Company separated the Notes into debt and equity components according to the accounting guidance for convertible debt instruments that may be fully or partially settled in cash upon conversion. The carrying amount of the debt component, which approximates its fair value, was estimated by using an interest rate for nonconvertible debt, with terms similar to the Notes. The excess of the principal amount of the Notes over the fair value of the debt component was recorded as a debt discount and a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. The debt discount is accreted to the carrying value of the Notes over their term as interest expense using the interest method. The amount recorded to additional paid-in capital will not to be remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. As of March 12, 2015, as a part of the Merger valuation, the Company recorded $129.3 million as debt and $287.3 million as additional paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity. On June 9, 2015, the Company settled ten of the Notes in both cash and shares owing to a receipt of notice of conversion in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

92


The net carrying amount of liability component of the Notes as of January 3, 2016 consists of the following:

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Principal amount

 

$

150,000

 

Settlement due to notice from bondholder

 

 

(10

)

Unamortized debt discount

 

 

(18,145

)

Net carrying value

 

$

131,845

 

The following table presents the interest expense recognizedequipment, net” on the Notes duringCompany's Consolidated Balance Sheet.




During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3, 2016

 

 

 

( in thousands)

 

Contractual interest expense at 2% per annum

 

$

2,441

 

Accretion of debt discount

 

 

2,700

 

Total

 

$

5,141

 

Capped Calls

In connection with1, 2017, the Notes, Spansion had entered into capped call transactions in fiscal 2013 with certain bank counterparties to reduce the potential dilution to their common stock upon exchange of the Notes. The fairCompany purchased previously leased manufacturing equipment having gross value and net book value of the capped call assumed as a part of the Merger was $25.3 million. In March 2015, the Company$18.8 million and the counterparties agreed to terminate and unwind the capped calls and the Company received a cash settlement of $25.3$9.4 million, which has been recorded as a credit to additional paid-in-capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 3, 2016.

Equipment Loans

respectively. As at December 31, 2017, there are no balances outstanding under these capital leases.


In December 2011, the Company obtained equipment loans from a certain financial institution for an aggregate amount of $14.1 million. These loansAs of December 31, 2017, there are collateralized by certain of the Company’s manufacturingno balances outstanding under these equipment and bear interest of 3.15% to 3.18% per annum and are payable in 60 equal installments which commenced in January 2012. leases.

Future Debt Payments

The related master loan agreement includes a variety of standard covenants. All offuture scheduled principal payments for the outstanding balanceCompany's debt as of January 3, 2016 was recordedDecember 31, 2017 were as part of “Other current liabilities.” At January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, the fair value of the equipment loans approximated the carrying value. The fair value was estimated using discounted cash flow analysis using relevant factors that might affect the fair value, such as present value factors and risk-free interest rates based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve.

The schedule of principal payments under equipment loans is as follows:

Fiscal Year

 

(In thousands)

 

2016

 

$

3,003

 

Total

 

$

3,003

 


Fiscal Year Total
   
2018 $27,303
2019 30,715
2020 152,944
2021 412,952
2022 and beyond 437,500
Total $1,061,414


NOTE 15. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
$450 million Stock Buyback Programs:

Program:

On October 20, 2015, the Company’s Board authorized a new $450 million stock buyback program. In connection with the approval of the new share repurchase plan, the share repurchase plan previously approved in September 2011 was terminated. The program allows the Company to purchase its common stock or enter into equity derivative transactions related to our common stock. The timing and actual amount expended with the new authorized funds will depend on a variety of factors including the market price of the Company’s common stock, regulatory, legal, and contractual requirements, alternativesalternative uses of cash, availability of on shore cash and other market factors. The program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at the Company’s discretion. From September 2011Under the program through the terminationend of the program,fiscal 2017, the Company used $327.4$239.2 million from the program to repurchase 24.429.5 million shares at an average share price of $13.4. Under the new program authorized in October, 2015 through the end of fiscal 2015, the Company used $56.5 million to repurchase 5.7 million share at an average price of $10.00.  

93


$8.11.  

Yield Enhancement Program:

In fiscal 2009, the Audit Committee approved a yield enhancement strategy intended to improve the yield on the Company’s available cash. As part of this program, the Audit Committee authorized the Company to enter into short-term yield enhanced structured agreements, typically with maturities of 90 days or less, correlated to the Company’s stock price. Under the agreements, the Company entered into to date, it pays a fixed sum of cash upon execution of an agreement in exchange for the financial institution’s obligations to pay either a pre-determined amount of cash or shares of the Company’s common stock depending on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the expiration date of the agreement. Upon expiration of each agreement, if the closing market price of the Company’s common stock is above the pre-determined price, the Company will have its cash investment returned plus a yield substantially above the yield currently available for short-term cash investments. If the closing market price is at or below the pre-determined price, the Company will receive the number of shares specified at the agreement’s inception. As the outcome of these arrangements is based entirely on the Company’s stock price and does not require the Company to deliver either shares or cash, other than the original investment, the entire transaction is recorded in equity.

The Company enters into a yield enhanced structured agreement based upon a comparison of the yields available in the financial markets for similar maturities against the expected yield to be realized per the structured agreement and the related risks associated with this type of arrangement. The Company believes the risk associated with these types of agreements is no different than alternative investments available to the Company with equivalent counterparty credit ratings. All counterparties to a yield enhancement program have a credit rating of at least Aa2 or A as rated by major independent rating agencies. For all such agreements that matured to date, the yields of the structured agreements were far superior to the yields available in the financial markets primarily due to the volatility of the Company’s stock price and the pre-payment aspect of the agreements. The counterparty is willing to pay a premium over the yields available in the financial markets due to the structure of the agreement.

The Company had no activity related to yield enhanced structured agreements during fiscal 2013.2016 and 2017. The following table summarizes the activity of the Company’s settled yield enhanced structured agreements during fiscal 20152015:


Periods
Aggregate
Price Paid
 
Total Cash Proceeds
Received Upon
Maturity
 
Cash Yield
Realized
 
Total Number of Shares
Received Upon
Maturity
 
Average Price Paid per
Share
Fiscal 2015:(in thousands)  
  
Settled through cash proceeds$28,966
 $29,353
 $387
 
 $
Settled through issuance of common stock9,601
 
 
 1,000,000
 9.6
Total for fiscal 2015$38,567
 $29,353
 $387
 1,000,000
 $9.6
.
Dividends
During fiscal 2017, the Company paid total cash dividends of $144.7 million consisting of dividends of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in all four quarters of the fiscal year. On November 7, 2017, the Company’s Board declared a cash dividend of $0.11 per share payable to holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business day on December 28, 2017. This cash dividend was paid on January 18, 2018 and 2014:

totaled $38.7 million.

Periods

 

Aggregate

Price Paid

 

 

Total Cash Proceeds

Received Upon

Maturity

 

 

Yield

Realized

 

 

Total Number of Shares

Received Upon

Maturity

 

 

Average Price Paid per

Share

 

Fiscal 2015:

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settled through cash proceeds

 

$

28,966

 

 

$

29,353

 

 

$

387

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Settled through issuance of common stock

 

 

9,601

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

9.6

 

Total for fiscal 2015

 

$

38,567

 

 

$

29,353

 

 

$

387

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

9.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settled through cash proceeds

 

$

19,415

 

 

$

19,733

 

 

$

318

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Settled through issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total for fiscal 2014

 

$

19,415

 

 

$

19,733

 

 

$

318

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

During fiscal 2016, the Company paid total cash dividends of $141.4 million, consisting of dividends of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in all four quarters of the fiscal year.

.

Dividends

During fiscal 2015, the Company paid total cash dividends of $128.0 million, consisting of dividends of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in all four quarters of the fiscal year. On November 9,

NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During fiscal years 2017, 2016 or 2015, in the Company’s Board declaredordinary course of business, the Company purchased from, or sold to, several entities, for which one of its directors or executive officers also serves or served as a cash dividend of $0.11 per share payable to holders of recorddirector or entities that are otherwise affiliated with one of the Company’s common stock atCompany's directors or executive officers.

The following table provides the closetransactions with these parties for the indicated periods for the time period such parties were a related party of business day onthe Company:
 Year ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016 
 (in thousands)
Total revenues$4,713
 $2,965
 $1,684
 
Total purchases$54,236
 $7,936
 $3,963
 

As of December 31, 2015. This cash dividend was paid on2017 and January 21, 2016 and1, 2017, total receivable balances with these parties totaled $36.5 million.

During fiscal 2014, the Company paid total cash dividends of $69.2 million, consisting of dividends of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in all four quarters of the fiscal year. On November 24, 2014 the Company’s Board declared a cash dividend of $0.11 per share payable to holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business day on December 26, 2014. This cash dividend was paid on January 15, 2015 and totaled $17.9 million.

During fiscal 2013, the Company paid total cash dividends of $64.8 million, consisting of dividends of $0.11 per share of common stock paid in all four quarters of the fiscal year. On November 1, 2013 the Company’s Board declared a cash dividend of $0.11 per share payable to holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business day on December 23, 2013. This cash dividend was paid on January 15, 2014 and totaled $16.9 million.

94


NOTE 15. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENT

During fiscal 2014, the Company invested an additional $15 million in a company that designs, develops and manufactures products in the area of advanced batter storage for mobile consumer devices. The additional investment in this company increased the Company’s ownership interest in the company’s outstanding stock from 17.6% to 26.2% as of December 28, 2014 and required the Company to change from the cost method of accounting to the equity method of accounting for this investment. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company is required to record its interest in the investee's reported net income or loss for each reporting period. Additionally, the Company is required to present its prior period financial results to reflect the equity method of accounting from the date of the initial investment in the company.

During fiscal 2015, the Company invested an additional $28.0 million, which increased its cumulative total investment to $41.3 million, representing 38.7% of such investee's outstanding voting shares as of January 3, 2016.

Cypress's results of operations include charges of $7.1 million, $5.1$4.8 million and $1.9$6.9 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended 2015, 2014 and 2013, for this investment which were recorded in "Equity in Net loss of equity method investee" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

total payable balances with these parties totaled $9.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

NOTE 16.17. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average common shares outstanding.outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average common shares outstanding and any dilutive potential common shares. Diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average common shares outstanding andoutstanding. This computation excludes all dilutive potential common shares when the Company is in a net loss position as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The Company’s dilutive securities primarily include stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock awards.

awards, and the exchangeable notes.



The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Net Income (Loss) per Share—Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress for basic

   computation

 

$

(378,867

)

 

$

17,936

 

 

$

(48,242

)

Weighted-average common shares for basic computation

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

159,031

 

 

 

148,558

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

Net Income (Loss) per Share—Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress for diluted

   computation

 

$

(378,867

)

 

$

17,936

 

 

$

(48,242

)

Weighted-average common shares for basic computation

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

159,031

 

 

 

148,558

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock

   awards and other

 

 

 

 

 

10,091

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares for diluted computation

 

 

302,036

 

 

 

169,122

 

 

 

148,558

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

 

$

(1.25

)

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

(0.32

)

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Net Income (Loss) per Share—Basic:   
  
Net (loss) attributable to Cypress for basic and diluted computation$(80,915) $(683,234) $(365,292)
Weighted-average common shares for basic computation333,451
 319,522
 302,036
Net (loss) per share—basic$(0.24) $(2.14) $(1.21)
Net (Loss) per Share—Diluted: 
  
  
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress for diluted computation$(80,915) $(683,234) $(365,292)
Weighted-average common shares for basic computation333,451
 319,522
 302,036
Effect of dilutive securities: 
  
  
Stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and other
 
 
Weighted-average common shares for diluted computation333,451
 319,522
 302,036
Net income (loss) per share—diluted$(0.24) $(2.14) $(1.21)
Anti-Dilutive Securities:

The following securities calculated on a weighted average basis were excluded from the computation of diluted Netnet income (loss) per share as their impact was anti-dilutive:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock

   awards

 

 

6,828

 

 

 

8,708

 

 

 

8,023

 


 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (in thousands) 
Stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards8,375
 6,226
 11,316
Exchangeable Notes17,732
 13,844
 15,210

NOTE 17.18.  EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Pension Plans

The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans covering employees in certain of its international locations. The Company does not have defined-benefit pension plans for its United States-based employees. Pension plan benefits are based primarily on participants’ compensation and years of service credited as specified under the terms of each country’s plan. The funding policy is consistent with the local requirements of each country.

As of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, projected benefit obligations totaled $8.4$10.7 million and $9.0$9.7 million, respectively, and the fair value of plan assets was $3.3 million and $3.4$3.2 million, respectively.

Spansion Innovates Group Cash balance planBalance Plan (Defined Benefit Plan)

In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed the Spansion Innovates Group Cash Balance Plan (a defined benefit pension plan) in Japan. Defined benefit pension plans are accounted for on an actuarial basis, which requires the selection of various assumptions such as turnover rates, discount rates and other factors. The discount rate assumption is determined by comparing the projected benefit payments to the Japanese corporate bonds yield curve as of end of the fiscal year. The benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation (PBO), which represents the actuarial present value of benefits expected to be paid upon retirement. This liability is recorded in other long term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net periodic pension cost is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and includes service cost. Service cost represents the actuarial present value of


participant benefits earned in the current year. Interest cost represents the time value of money associated with the passage of time on the PBO. Gains or losses resulting from a change in the PBO if actual results differ from actuarial assumptions will be accumulated and amortized over the future life of the plan participants if they exceed 10% of the PBO, being the corridor amount. If the amount of a net gain or loss does not exceed the corridor amount, they will be recorded in other comprehensive income.


Also in connection with the assumption of this pension plan liability, the Company assumed the restricted cash balance, which relates to the underfunded portion of the pension liability. The pension liability will bewas paid out byin fiscal 2017 in annual installments according to the employee's election. As of January 3, 2016 the Company has a pension liability of $3.9 million and $3.7 million recorded as a part of the accrued compensation and employee benefits, and other long-term liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of January 3, 2016, the Company has restricted cash of $3.7 million and $3.5 million recorded in other current assets and other long-term assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


The plan is unfunded as of January 3, 2016.December 31, 2017. This status is not indicative of the Company’s ability to pay ongoing pension benefits. The Company recorded a net periodic cost of $0.9$0.7 million and $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016.1, 2017, respectively. The Company has accrued a liability of $1.7$2.3 million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 20161, 2017, respectively, which has been recorded in other long term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company expects to contribute an immaterial amount towards the Cash Balance Plan for fiscal 2016.

Key Employee Bonus2017.


Cypress Incentive Plan (“KEBP”)


The Company has a keyan employee bonusincentive plan, which provides for cash incentive payments to certain key employees including all named executive officers except the Chief Executive Officer.officers. Payments under the plan are determined based uponup on certain performance measures, including the Company’s Non-GAAP actual PBT% compared to a targetrevenue and EPS as well as the achievement of strategic, operational and financial goals established for the company and for each key employee. The Company recorded total charges of $0.5approximately $61.0 million under the plan in fiscal 2015, $2.7 million under the plan in fiscal 2014 and $7.4 million in fiscal 2013.

Performance Bonus Plan

2017.

Deferred Compensation Plans
The Company has a performance bonus plan which provides for incentive payments to the Company’s CEO under a shareholder approved Plan. Payments under the plan are determined based upon the attainment and certification of certain objective performance criteria established by the Committee. Under the plan, the Company recorded total charges of less than $0.1 million for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013.

96


Performance Profit Sharing Plan (“PPSP”)

The Company has a performance profit sharing plan, which provides incentive payments to all of its employees. Payments under the plan are determined based upon the Company’s earnings per share and the employees’ percentage of success in achieving certain performance goals. The Company recorded total charges of $0.2 million under the plan in fiscal 2015, $1.1 million under the plan in fiscal 2014 and $2.7 million in fiscal 2013.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company has a deferred compensation plan,plans, which provides certain key employees, including its executive management, with the ability to defer the receipt of compensation in order to accumulate funds for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. The Company does not make contributions to the deferred compensation planplans or guarantee returns on the investments. Participant deferrals and investment gains and losses remain the Company’s assets and are subject to claims of general creditors.

Under the deferred compensation planplans the assets are recorded at fair value in each reporting period with the offset being recorded in “Other income (expense), net.” The liabilities are recorded at fair value in each reporting period with the offset being recorded as an operating expense or income. As of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, the fair value of the assets was $41.2$49.5 million and $44.1$45.6 million, respectively, and the fair value of the liabilities was $41.5$50.6 million and $43.5$46.4 million, respectively.

All non-cash expense and income recorded under the deferred compensation planplans were included in the following line items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Changes in fair value of assets recorded in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense), net

 

$

(1,353

)

 

$

3,014

 

 

$

6,371

 

Changes in fair value of liabilities recorded in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

38

 

 

 

427

 

 

 

(854

)

Research and development expenses

 

 

233

 

 

 

(793

)

 

 

(1,744

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

260

 

 

 

(1,855

)

 

 

(3,795

)

Total income (expense), net

 

$

(822

)

 

$

793

 

 

$

(22

)

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (in thousands)
Changes in fair value of assets recorded in:   
  
Other income (expense), net$6,087
 $2,326
 $(1,353)
Changes in fair value of liabilities recorded in: 
  
  
Cost of revenues(602) (288) 38
Research and development expenses(2,826) (884) 233
Selling, general and administrative expenses(3,936) (1,889) 260
Total income (expense), net$(1,277) $(735) $(822)
401(k) Plan



The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan which provides participating employees with an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement on a tax deferred basis. TheAs of December 31, 2017, the Company doesdid not make contributions to the 401(k) plan and all employee contributions are fully vested.

97


Effective January 1, 2018, Cypress has initiated an employer matching contribution equal to 50% of the first $2,000 that the employees contribute to the Plan for both pre-tax and Roth deferrals.


NOTE 18.19. INCOME TAXES

The geographic distribution of income (loss) before income taxes and the components of income tax benefit (provision) are summarized below:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

United States loss

 

$

(476,014

)

 

$

(109,307

)

 

$

(122,162

)

Foreign income

 

 

111,836

 

 

 

124,652

 

 

 

64,314

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

(364,178

)

 

 

15,345

 

 

 

(57,848

)

Income tax benefit (provision):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current tax benefit (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

219

 

 

 

5,551

 

 

 

12,026

 

State

 

 

55

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

(120

)

Foreign

 

 

(17,189

)

 

 

(4,732

)

 

 

(4,292

)

Total current tax benefit (expense)

 

 

(16,915

)

 

 

770

 

 

 

7,614

 

Deferred tax benefit (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(610

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

State

 

 

(155

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

720

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

147

 

Total deferred tax benefit (expense)

 

 

(45

)

 

 

403

 

 

 

147

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

$

(16,960

)

 

$

1,173

 

 

$

7,761

 

 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
United States loss$(108,146) $(786,610) $(460,168)
Foreign income38,388
 105,992
 111,836
Income (loss) before income taxes(69,758) (680,618) (348,332)
Income tax benefit (provision): 
  
  
Current tax benefit (expense): 
  
  
Federal(1,358) (1,144) 219
State(125) 204
 55
Foreign(15,081) (926) (17,189)
Total current tax benefit (expense)(16,564) (1,866) (16,915)
Deferred tax benefit (expense): 
  
  
Federal4,341
 (556) (610)
State(67) (31) (155)
Foreign1,133
 (163) 720
Total deferred tax benefit (expense)5,407
 (750) (45)
Income tax benefit (provision)$(11,157) $(2,616) $(16,960)
Income tax benefit (provision) differs from the amounts obtained by applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate to income (loss) before taxes as shown below:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit (provision) at U.S. statutory rate of 35%

 

$

127,462

 

 

$

(5,371

)

 

$

19,589

 

Foreign income at other than U.S. rates

 

 

(22,385

)

 

 

37,477

 

 

 

15,425

 

Future benefits not recognized

 

 

(126,846

)

 

 

(35,107

)

 

 

(41,797

)

Reversal of previously accrued taxes

 

 

10,939

 

 

 

8,286

 

 

 

13,872

 

Tax impact of acquisitions

 

 

(6,457

)

 

 

(2,538

)

 

 

1,061

 

Foreign withholding taxes

 

 

(243

)

 

 

(1,195

)

 

 

(535

)

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

(138

)

 

 

(49

)

 

 

93

 

Other, net

 

 

708

 

 

 

(330

)

 

 

53

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

$

(16,960

)

 

$

1,173

 

 

$

7,761

 

98


 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
   (In thousands)  
Benefit (provision) at U.S. statutory rate of 35%$24,415
 $238,216
 $121,916
Foreign income at other than U.S. rates(67,685) (36,552) (22,385)
Future benefits not recognized29,762
 (29,207) (121,300)
Goodwill impairment
 (181,987) 
Reversal of previously accrued taxes1,447
 13,371
 10,939
Tax impact of acquisitions
 
 (6,457)
Foreign withholding taxes(3,718) (2,018) (243)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(192) (87) (138)
Tax credit refund5,637
 
 
Other, net(823) (4,352) 708
Income tax benefit (provision)$(11,157) $(2,616) $(16,960)



The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credits and net operating loss carryovers

 

$

624,086

 

 

$

265,827

 

Reserves and accruals

 

 

160,804

 

 

 

55,678

 

Excess of book over tax depreciation

 

 

12,463

 

 

 

32,892

 

Deferred income

 

 

20,059

 

 

 

6,197

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

817,412

 

 

 

360,594

 

Less valuation allowance

 

 

(525,021

)

 

 

(358,424

)

Deferred tax assets, net

 

 

292,391

 

 

 

2,170

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign earnings

 

 

(184,671

)

 

 

 

Intangible assets arising from acquisitions

 

 

(108,784

)

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(293,455

)

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

(1,064

)

 

$

2,170

 

 As of
 December 31,
2017
 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
Deferred tax assets: 
  
Credits and net operating loss carryovers$460,329
 $496,448
Reserves and accruals92,655
 120,453
Excess of book over tax depreciation11,744
 35,886
Deferred income39,367
 26,457
Total deferred tax assets604,095
 679,244
Less valuation allowance(513,191) (445,030)
Deferred tax assets, net90,904
 234,214
Deferred tax liabilities: 
  
Foreign earnings and others(68,013) (163,914)
Intangible assets arising from acquisitions(24,477) (71,960)
Total deferred tax liabilities(92,490) (235,874)
Net deferred tax assets$(1,586) $(1,660)
The Company has the following tax loss and credit carryforwards available to offset future income tax liabilities:

Carryforward

Amount

Expiration Date

($ in millions)

Federal net operating loss carryforward

1,708

2020-2035

Federal research credit carryforward

136

2018-2035

International foreign tax credit carryforward

13

2016-2023

State research credit carryforward

105

Indefinite

State net operating loss carryforward

761

2016-2035

Carryforward Amount Expiration Date
  ($ in millions)  
Federal net operating loss carryforward $1,195
 2022-2037
Federal research credit carryforward $118
 2018-2037
International foreign tax credit carryforward $8
 2018-2023
State research credit carryforward $97
 Indefinite
State net operating loss carryforward $434
 2018-2036
The federal and state net operating loss carryforward is from acquired companies and the annual use of such loss is subject to significant limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Foreign tax credits may only be used to offset tax attributable to foreign source income.

As of January 3, 2016December 31, 2017, of the total deferred tax assets of $817.4$604.1 million, a valuation allowance of $525.0$513.2 million has been recorded for the portion whichthat is not more likely than not to be realized. As of December 28, 2014,January 1, 2017, of the total deferred tax assets of $360.6$679.2 million, a valuation allowance of $358.4$445.0 million has been recorded for the portion which is not more likely than not to be realized. The Company’s determination of the need for a valuation allowance each year is based on a jurisdictional assessment.

The Company received tax deductions from the gains realized by employees on the exercise of certain non-qualified stock options for which the benefit is recognized as a component of stockholders’ equity. When recognized, the tax benefit related to $648.3 million of the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards will be accounted for as an increase to additional paid-in capital rather than a reduction of the income tax provision.

The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act (“Act”) (H.R 2029) was signed into law on December 18, 2015.  The Act contains a number of provisions including, most notably, permanent extension of the United States federal research tax credit and extension of the refundable AMT credit in lieu of bonus depreciation.  The Act did not have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2015 due to the effect of the valuation allowance on the Company's deferred tax assets.

United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $339.1 million and $298.6 million of undistributed earnings for certain non-United States subsidiaries as of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014, respectively, because portion of such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits). It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if these earnings were to be distributed.

99


The Company’s global operations involve manufacturing, research and development, and selling activities. The Company’s operations outside the U.S. are in certain countries that impose a statutory tax rate both higher and lower than the U.S. The Company is subject to tax holidays in the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand where it manufactures and designs certain products. These tax holidays are scheduled to expire at varying times within the next sixfive years. The Company’s tax benefit of these tax holidays for the year ended January 3, 2016December 31, 2017 had an insignificant impact on earnings per share. Overall, the Company expects its foreign earnings to be taxed at rates lower than the statutory tax rate in the U.S.



Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The following table is a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Unrecognized tax benefits, as of December 30, 2012

 

$

31,466

 

Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

(9,216

)

Increase based on tax positions related to current year

 

 

962

 

Increase based on tax positions related to prior year

 

 

163

 

Decrease related to lapsing of statute of limitation

 

 

(4,762

)

Unrecognized tax benefits, as of December 29, 2013

 

$

18,613

 

Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

(6,361

)

Increase based on tax positions related to current year

 

 

993

 

Decrease related to lapsing of statute of limitation

 

 

(1,638

)

Unrecognized tax benefits, as of December 28, 2014

 

$

11,607

 

Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

(838

)

Decrease related to lapsing of statute of limitation

 

 

(818

)

Decrease based on tax positions related to prior year

 

 

(10,272

)

Increase based on tax positions related to current year

 

 

6,487

 

Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior

   periods (including those related to acquisitions made

   during the year)

 

 

108,677

 

Unrecognized tax benefits, as of January 3, 2016

 

$

114,843

 

 (In thousands)
Unrecognized tax benefits, as of December 28, 2014$11,607
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities(838)
Decrease related to lapsing of statute of limitation(818)
Decrease based on tax positions related to prior year(10,272)
Increase based on tax positions related to current year6,487
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior periods (including those related to acquisitions made during the year)108,677
Unrecognized tax benefits, as of January 3, 2016$114,843
Decrease related to lapsing of statute of limitation(7,190)
Decrease based on tax positions related to prior year
Increase based on tax positions related to current year5,639
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior periods33,032
Unrecognized tax benefits, as of January 1, 2017$146,324
Decrease related to lapsing of statute of limitation(1,108)
Decrease based on tax positions related to prior year
Increase based on tax positions related to current year4,475
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior periods1,631
Decrease in balances due to the Tax Reform corporate tax rate change from 35% to 21%(36,087)
Unrecognized tax benefits, as of December 31, 2017$115,235
Gross unrecognized tax benefits increaseddecreased by $103$31.1 million during fiscal year 2015,2017, resulting in gross unrecognized tax benefits of $115$115.2 million as of January 3, 2016. The increase in gross unrecognized tax benefits is primarily a result of our Merger with Spansion. Uncertain tax positions assumed in connection with merger and acquisitions are initially estimated as of the acquisition date.

December 31, 2017.

During fiscal year 2015,2017, the Company recognized $2$1.1 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits as a result of either the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain audit periods or settlement with taxing authorities.

The Company recognized interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognized approximately $6$2.2 million of expensebenefit related to interest and penalties in fiscal year 2015.2017. Accrued interest and penalties are included within other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, the combined amount of cumulative accrued interest and penalties was approximately $12$11.0 million and $3$8.5 million, respectively. The increase in cumulative accrued interest and penalties is primarily a result of the Merger with Spansion.

As of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, the amountsamount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate totaled $28.4$28.9 million and $12.9$24.3 million, respectively.

Management believes events that could occur in the next 12 months and cause a material change in unrecognized tax benefits include, but are not limited to, the following:

·

completion of examinations by the U.S. or foreign taxing authorities; and

·

expiration of statute of limitations on the Company’s tax returns.

completion of examinations by the U.S. or foreign taxing authorities; and

100


expiration of statute of limitations on the Company’s tax returns.
The calculation of unrecognized tax benefits involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex global tax regulations. The Company regularly assesses its tax positions in light of legislative, bilateral tax treaty, regulatory and judicial developments in the countries in which it does business. The Company believes it is reasonably possible that it may recognize up to approximately $7.0$0.2 million of its existing unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitations and the resolution of agreements with domestic and various foreign tax authorities.



Classification of Interest and Penalties

Our

The Company's policy is to classify interest expense and penalties, if any, as components of income tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, the amount of accrued interest and penalties totaled $12.0$11.0 million and $3.0$8.5 million, respectively. The Company recorded a charge or (benefit) from interest and penalties of $9.1$2.2 million, ($2.8)3.4) million and $1.9$9.1 million during fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Tax Examinations

The following table summarizes the Company’s major tax jurisdictions and the tax years that remain subject to examination by such jurisdictions as of January 3, 2016:

December 31, 2017:

Tax Jurisdictions

Tax Years

United States

2009 and onward

Philippines

Tax Jurisdictions

Tax Years

United States2010 and onward
Philippines2014 and onward
Israel2014 and onward
India2004 and onward
Thailand2011 and onward

Israel

Malaysia

20142007 and onward

India

Switzerland

20092008 and onward

Thailand

California

2011 and onward

Japan2010 and onward

Malaysia

2007 and onward

Switzerland

2008 and onward

California

2010 and onward

Non-U.S. tax authorities have completed their income tax examinations of the Company’s subsidiary in Israel for fiscal years 2008-2013 and its branch in Germany for fiscal years 2010 to 2013. Both Israel and Germany examinations did not result in material adjustments to the Company’s tax liabilities.

Income tax examinations of the Company’s Malaysian subsidiary for the fiscal years 2007 to 20122013 and its Thailandour Philippine subsidiary for fiscal year 20102014 are in progress. The Company does not believe the ultimate outcome of these examinations will result in a material increase to its tax liability.

liability
.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21%, the repeal of corporate AMT, the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. The Company has calculated a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Act in its year end income tax provision in accordance with its understanding of the Act and guidance available as of the date of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. As a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017, which resulted in a provisional decrease of deferred tax balance and corresponding valuation allowance balance of $158.7 million. The provisional amount related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax liabilities, based on the rates at which it is expected to reverse in the future, resulted in a tax benefit of $3.0 million. The provisional amount related to the repeal of corporate AMT was a tax benefit of $5.6 million as the prior year AMT credit will be refunded over 2018 - 2021. Based on the Act and guidance available as of the date of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements, the Company determined a provisional estimate of the impact of the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulative foreign subsidiary earnings. The Company estimates that the transition tax will result in the utilization of $46.0 million of net operating loss carryforwards against which the Company maintains a corresponding valuation allowance.
On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company has determined that there is no additional current tax expense required to be recorded in connection with the transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of net cumulative foreign earnings and a reasonable estimate at December 31, 2017 as the Company believes it has sufficient tax attributes such as net operating loss and tax credits to offset any tax imposed on this income. Additional work is necessary for a more detailed analysis of the Company's historical foreign earnings as well as potential correlative adjustments.


Any subsequent adjustment to these amounts will be recorded to current tax expense upon completion of the analysis during the subsequent quarters of 2018.

United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $361.3 million of undistributed earnings for non-United States subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017, because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested. The Company did not record a provision for additional United States income taxes caused by the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulative foreign subsidiary earnings as the Company has sufficient net operating loss carryforwards to offset the income. Withholding taxes associated with these undistributed earnings are not significant.  

The Company intends to continue maintaining a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. However, considering the Company's current assessment of the probability of maintaining profitability, there is a reasonable possibility that, within the next year, sufficient positive evidence may become available to reach a conclusion that a significant portion, or all, of the valuation allowance will no longer be needed. As such, the Company may release a significant portion, or all, of its valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets within the next 12 months. This release, if any, would result in the recognition of certain deferred tax assets and a decrease to income tax expense for the period such release is recorded.


NOTE 19.20.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Product Warranties


The Company warrants its products against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year and that product warranty is generally limited to a refund of the original purchase price of the product or a replacement part. The Company estimates warranty costs based on historical warranty claim experience. Warranty returns are recorded as an allowance for sales returns. The allowance for sales returns is reviewed quarterly to verify that it properly reflects the remaining obligations based on the anticipated returns over the balance of the obligation period.


The following table presents warranty reserve activities:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

2,370

 

 

$

2,628

 

 

$

3,360

 

Warranties assumed as part of the merger

 

 

1,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions

 

 

2,820

 

 

 

1,449

 

 

 

390

 

Settlements made

 

 

(2,348

)

 

 

(1,707

)

 

 

(1,122

)

Ending balance

 

$

4,096

 

 

$

2,370

 

 

$

2,628

 

101


 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
Beginning balance$3,996
 $4,096
 $2,370
Warranties assumed as part of the Spansion merger
 
 1,254
Provisions & prior warranty estimates2,947
 5,261
 2,820
Settlements made(2,498) (5,361) (2,348)
Ending balance$4,445
 $3,996
 $4,096




Patent License Agreement


In December 2015, the Company entered into a strategic Patent License Agreement (“Agreement”) with Round Rock LLC (“Round Rock”) under which the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries received a license to Round Rock’s substantial patent portfolio. This transaction allowed the Company and Round Rock to continue to develop its strategic relationship regarding patent monetization and litigation defense. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company paid a license fee of $6$6.0 million.  One of the benefits that the Company received from the Agreement was the avoidance of future litigation expenses as well as future customer disruption and based upon its analysis, it determined that a portion of the license fee that the Company will pay Round Rock represents the cumulative cost relating to prior years. As such,Consequently, the Company has recorded $2.2 million charge to cost of revenues in fiscal 2015. TheDuring fiscal 2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized $3.8 million on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of whichhas recorded $0.8 million, in Current assets, and $3.0 million in Long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheetrespectively, as part of January 3, 2016 and will amortize over the purchased lifecost of the patent portfolio.

revenues related to this arrangement.


On April 30, 2012, the Company entered into a strategic Patent License Agreement (“PLA”) with IV Global Licensing LLC (“IV”) under which the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries received a license to IV’s substantial patent portfolio. This transaction allowed the Company and IV to continue to develop their strategic relationship regarding patent monetization and litigation defense. Under the terms of the PLA, the Company paid a license fee of $14$14.0 million and to purchase certain litigation defense services from IV in the future. In addition, in a related agreement, IV is expected to make certain patent purchases from the Company in the near term. The exact terms and conditions of the PLA are subject to confidentiality provisions, and are the subject of an application for confidential treatment to be filed with the SEC. In June 2015, the Company paid an additional license fee of $18.5 million under the existing license agreement due to the merger with Spansion in March 2015.


One of the benefits that the Company received from the PLA was the avoidance of future litigation expenses as well as future customer disruption and based upon the Company’s analysis, using a relief from royalty method, the Company determined that a portion of the license fee that it will pay IV represents the cumulative cost relating to prior years. As such, the Company recorded, $7.1 million which was recorded as a charge to cost of revenues in fiscal 2012. The Company originally capitalized $6.9 million on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and an additional $18.518.5 million due to the acquisition of Spansion as discussed above and arealso paid $5.8 million in 2016 remaining from the original agreement. The Company is amortizing such costs over the remaining life of the patent portfolio. Amortization expense was $4.4$4.5 million, $0.8$5.9 million and $0.8$4.4 million in fiscal years December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013, respectively. The remaining capitalized balance of the PLA is $18.7$12.4 millionand $18.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, respectively. Of such capitalized balance, $6.4 million and $5.6$6.4 million is in current assets, and $6.0 million and $12.2 million in Current assets, and $13.2 million and $3.8 million in Long-termlong-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014,1, 2017, respectively.

Capital Leases

On July 19, 2011, we entered into a capital lease agreement which allows us to borrow up to $35.0 million to finance the acquisition of certain manufacturing equipment. We have the option of purchasing the tools from the lessor at specified intervals during the lease term. The master lease contains standard covenants. Assets purchased under the capital lease are included in “Property, plant and equipment, net” as manufacturing equipment and the amortization is included in depreciation. As of January 3, 2016 the gross value and net book value of manufacturing equipment purchased under capital lease was $20.5 million and $11.9 million, respectively. As of January 3, 2016, the total minimum lease payments under our capital leases amounted to $7.2 million.

Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under the capitalized lease consist of the following:

Fiscal Year

 

(In thousands)

 

2016

 

$

6,715

 

2017

 

 

599

 

2018

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

 

7,314

 

Less: amount representing interest

 

 

(125

)

Present value of net minimum lease payments

 

$

7,189

 


102


Operating Lease Commitments

We lease


The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements that expire at various dates through fiscal 2018.2026. Some leases include renewal options, which would permit extensions of the expiration dates at rates approximating fair market rental values.


As of January 3, 2016December 31, 2017, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows:

Fiscal Year

 

(In thousands)

 

2016

 

 

16,171

 

2017

 

 

13,076

 

2018

 

 

9,164

 

2019

 

 

6,541

 

2020

 

 

6,028

 

2021 and Thereafter

 

 

23,835

 

Total

 

$

74,815

 

Fiscal Year (In thousands)
2018 $15,258
2019 11,854
2020 9,910
2021 6,685
2022 5,621
2023 and Thereafter 17,064
Total $66,392
Rental expenses totaled $17.1$20.0 million, $6.8$15.0 million and $7.2$17.1 million in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively.



Restructuring accrual balances related to operating facility leases were $11.5 million and 2013,$14.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, respectively.

Equity Investment Commitments

We have committed


Contractual Obligations

The Company has entered into agreements with certain vendors that include "take or pay" terms. Take or pay terms obligate the Company to purchase additional preferred stock from a company that worksminimum required amount or services or make specified payments in lieu of such purchase. The Company may not be able to consume minimum commitments under these take or pay terms, requiring payments to vendors, which may have a material adverse impact on the area of advanced battery storage. In fiscal 2015, we invested $28.0 million in this company. Subject to the attainment of certain milestones, we intend to purchase additional preferred stock in this company.

Company's earnings.


Litigation and Asserted Claims


In August 15, 2016, a matter associated with Ramtron International Corporationpatent infringement lawsuit was filed by the California Institute of Technology (“Ramtron”Caltech”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cypress, bankruptcy proceedings are ongoing in Italy where the trustee for four bankrupt entities of Finmek S.pA. is seeking refunds of payments made by Finmek to Ramtron prior to Finmek’s bankruptcy in 2004. In November 2014, one of the courts presiding over these proceedings found that two payments should be refunded to Finmek, which currently total $0.5 million, including interest and fees. We believe this ruling was made in error and are appealing this decision. Due to the current stage of the proceedings and the appellate process, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of possible loss, if any.

In 2013, a former employee filed a grievance against the Company seeking back payin the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 16-cv-03714). The other co-defendants are Apple Inc., Avago Technologies Limited, Broadcom Corporation, and reinstatement or front pay. That matter was tried before an administrative law judge inBroadcom Limited. Caltech alleges that defendants infringe four patents. On July 2014. In December 2014,12, 2017, the administrative law judgeCourt issued a ruling in favorclaim construction order. Trial will not occur until at least the third quarter of the former employee for amounts totaling $1.3 million. We believe the ruling was erroneous and are currently appealing the decision. Due to the current stage of the proceedings2018, and the appellate process, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of possible loss, if any.

On May 6, 2015, the Company entered into a confidential settlement agreement with GSI Technology, Inc. under which all outstanding patent and antitrust disputes and actions between the companies were settled. As a part of the settlement, both companies agreed to dismiss with prejudice all pending litigation.  The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

In the LongPath Capital, LLC (“LongPath”) appraisal case, Petitioner LongPath sought an appraisal of the fair value of the shares of Ramtron common stock held by LongPath prior to the Company's acquisition of Ramtron in 2012. In June 2013, the Company paid the purchase price of $3.10 per share to LongPath, or $1.5 million, to cut off the accrual of statutory interest on the principal. As a result, the Company's potential exposure was limited to any premium on the purchase price that might be awarded by the court plus the interest accrued prior to June 2013. On June 30, 2015, the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that the fair value of Ramtron as of the merger date was $3.07 per share, $0.03 below the purchase price, rejecting LongPath's claim that Ramtron should have been valued at over $4.00 per share.  LongPath did not appeal the ruling and the case is now closed and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement, the Company’s six-patent infringement case against LG Electronics, Inc. (“LG”) (Case No. 13-cv-04034-SBA), which was filed in August 2013, and the six petitions filed by LG for inter partes review of the asserted patents were settled effective as of July 28, 2015. The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

103


The Company has reached a settlement in the pending class action claims in three Canadian provinces relating to the original SRAM class action case that was resolved in the United States in 2010. As with the case in the United States, the Company is confident that it did not engage in any antitrust activity, however given that it was the last remaining defendant and the cost of continued litigation would far exceed the cost of a nominal settlement, the Company agreed to settle the case. The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

After our announcement of the Merger in December 2014, two separate putative class action complaints (Walter Jeter v. Spansion Inc., et. al. (No. 114CV274635) and Shiva Y. Stein v. Spansion Inc., el. al. (No. 114CV274924)) were filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court, alleging claims of breach of fiduciary dutywill defend against the Spansion’s board of directors and naming Cypress as a defendant for aiding and abetting the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. While Cypress believes these lawsuits to be meritless, Spansion and Cypress entered into a memorandum of understanding with plaintiffs, the terms of which required additional disclosures by the Company and payment of nominal attorneys’ fees to the class counsel. Final resolution of these litigations will require court approval of a final settlement agreement.allegations accordingly.  Due to the current stage of the proceedings, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the loss or the range of possible loss,losses, if any.

In January 2017, matters related to two putative class action complaints filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court (Walter Jeter v. Spansion Inc., et. al. (No.114cv274635) and Shiva Y. Stein v. Spansion Inc., et. al. (No. 114CV274924)), were closed without materially adverse financial consequences for the Company.
On January 30, 2017, T.J. Rodgers, the former Chief Executive Officer and director of the Company, filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery captioned Rodgers v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., C.A. No. 2017-0070-AGB (Del. Ch.), seeking to inspect certain Company books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. On April 17, 2017, the Court ruled that Mr. Rodgers was entitled to certain books and records, which were provided by the Company to Mr. Rodgers.
On April 24, 2017, Mr. Rodgers filed a second lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery (C.A. No. 2017-0314-AGB), naming the Company’s directors as defendants and alleging breach of the fiduciary duty of candor. The Company is involved in various trademark opposition proceedingsparties subsequently entered into a settlement agreement, with an effective date of June 30, 2017, to resolve and dismiss with prejudice all ongoing litigation and claims relating to the subject matter of the Section 220 and breach of fiduciary duty actions. On July 26, 2017, the litigations were dismissed with prejudice. This matter was closed without materially adverse financial consequences for the Company.
During fiscal 2017, matters related to North Star Innovations, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 16-cv-368 and U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 16-cv-01721), Kingston Technology Corporation (“Kingston”) concerning Kingston’s “HYPERX” trademark(Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Proceeding Nos. 91218100, 91222728, and 92061796), and Standard Communications Pty Ltd. (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Case No. 2016/263578-002), were closed without materially adverse financial consequences for the Company’s “HYPERRAM trademark. These proceedings are inCompany.
In January 2018, matters related to a grievance filed by a former employee (United States Court of Appeals for the early stages, preventing an accurate assessment of potential outcomes.

Tenth Circuit, Case No. 16-9523 and District Court for El Paso County, Colorado, Case No. 2015-cv-30632), were closed without materially adverse financial consequences for the Company.

The Company is currently a party to various other legal proceedings, claims, disputes and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on its own investigations, the Company believes the ultimate outcome of the current legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position,condition, cash flows or results of operations. However, because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of the litigation, should the outcome of these actions be unfavorable, the Company's business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Indemnification Obligations

We are

The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which weit may be obligated to indemnify another partyother parties to such agreements with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise in the context of contracts we havethat the Company has entered into, under which wethe Company customarily agreeagrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations and covenants or terms and conditions related to such matters as the sale and/or delivery of ourits products, title to assets sold, certain intellectual property claims, defective


products, specified environmental matters and certain income taxes. In these circumstances, payment by usthe Company is customarily conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract, which procedures typically allow usthe Company to challenge the other party’s claims and vigorously defend ourselvesitself and the third party against such claims. Further, ourthe Company's obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time, amount or the scope of ourits responsibility and in some instances, wethe Company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made under these agreements.

It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these agreements due to the conditional nature of ourthe Company's obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments we havethe Company has made under these agreements have not had a material effect on ourthe Company’s business, financial condition cash flows or results of operations. We believeManagement believes that if wethe Company were to incur a loss in any of these matters, such loss would not have a material effect on ourits business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations, although there can be no assurance of this. As of January 3, 2016 weDecember 31, 2017, the Company had no reason to believe a loss exceeding amounts already recognized had been incurred.


NOTE 20.21. SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHICAL AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION

Segment Information

The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of high-performance solutions for embedded systems, from automotive, industrial and networking platforms to interactive consumer devices
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker ("CODM") is considered to be the chief executive officer.

In connection with the Merger, the Company has aligned Spansion's two major product groups with Cypress's existing business segments: legacy Spansion flash memory products are reported in the Company's Memory Products Division and legacy Spansion microcontroller and analog products are reported in the Company's Programmable Systems Division.

104


The Company operates in the following four reportable business segments:

Chief Executive Officer.

Business Segments

Description

PSD: Programmable Systems Division

PSD focuses on high-performance, programmable solutions. The programmable portfolio includes high-performance Traveo™automotive microcontrollers, PSoC® programmable system-on-chip products, ARM® Cortex®-M4, -M3, -M0+ microcontrollers and R4 CPUs, analog PMIC Power Management ICs, CapSense® capacitive-sensing controllers, TrueTouch® touchscreen and fingerprint reader products, and PSoC Bluetooth Low Energy solutions for the IoT. Effective March 12, 2015, PSD added Spansion’s microcontroller and analog products.

MPD: Memory Products Division

MPD focuses on high-performance parallel and serial NOR flash memories, NAND flash memories, static random access memory (SRAM), and high-reliability F-RAM™ferroelectric memory devices. Its purpose is to enhance our position in these products and invent new products and derivatives. Effective March 12, 2015, MPD added Spansion’s Flash memory products.

DCD: Data Communications Division

DCD focuses on USB controllers, Bluetooth® Low Energy solutions that leverage Cypress’s PRoC™ programmable radio-on-chip technology, WirelessUSB™ solutions, module solutions such as trackpads and Bluetooth Low Energy modules, and controllers for the new USB Type-C standard, which enables data transmission and power delivery over a single cable with a slimmer plug. DCD focuses primarily on industrial, handset and consumer electronics markets and applications.

ETD: Emerging Technologies Division

Also known as our “startup” division, ETD includes subsidiaries AgigA Tech Inc. and Deca Technologies Inc., as well as our foundry business and other development-stage activities.

The following tables set forth certain information relating to the reportable business segments:

Revenues:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Programmable Systems Division

 

$

613,884

 

 

$

283,206

 

 

$

292,707

 

Memory Products Division

 

 

871,640

 

 

 

347,887

 

 

 

338,986

 

Data Communications Division

 

 

72,791

 

 

 

70,378

 

 

 

79,410

 

Emerging Technologies and Other

 

 

49,538

 

 

 

24,026

 

 

 

11,590

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,607,853

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

$

722,693

 

105


 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
Microcontroller and Connectivity Division ("MCD")$1,409,265
 $994,482
 $731,279
Memory Products Division ("MPD")918,506
 928,626
 876,574
Total revenues$2,327,771
 $1,923,108
 $1,607,853

Income (Loss) from Operations before Income Taxes:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Programmable Systems Division

 

$

(70,644

)

 

$

(18,981

)

 

$

(20,105

)

Memory Products Division

 

 

105,940

 

 

 

134,283

 

 

 

111,667

 

Data Communications Division

 

 

(15,822

)

 

 

(10,130

)

 

 

(7,452

)

Emerging Technologies and Other

 

 

(7,730

)

 

 

(13,992

)

 

 

(20,860

)

Unallocated items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

(93,527

)

 

 

(50,170

)

 

 

(73,020

)

Restructuring (charges) benefit

 

 

(90,084

)

 

 

1,180

 

 

 

(15,357

)

Amortization of intangibles and other

   acquisition-related costs

 

 

(143,487

)

 

 

(13,955

)

 

 

(34,056

)

Impairment of assets and other

 

 

 

 

 

(7,760

)

 

 

(1,795

)

Gain on divestiture of TrueTouch® Mobile

   business

 

 

66,472

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in value of deferred compensation

   plan

 

 

(820

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impact of purchase accounting and other

 

 

(107,328

)

 

 

(62

)

 

 

5,008

 

Income (loss) from operations before income

   taxes

 

$

(357,030

)

 

$

20,413

 

 

$

(55,970

)

Depreciation:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Programmable Systems Division

 

$

10,484

 

 

$

13,613

 

 

$

14,642

 

Memory Products Division

 

 

89,156

 

 

 

15,998

 

 

 

16,332

 

Data Communications Division

 

 

1,946

 

 

 

3,234

 

 

 

3,851

 

Emerging Technologies and Other

 

 

24,910

 

 

 

6,960

 

 

 

4,680

 

Total depreciation

 

$

126,496

 

 

$

39,805

 

 

$

39,505

 



 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
Microcontroller and Connectivity Division$56,314
 $(12,674) $(67,572)
Memory Products Division279,129
 192,066
 83,054
Unallocated items:   
  
Stock-based compensation expense(91,581) (98,513) (83,690)
Restructuring (charges) benefit, including executive severance(9,088) (30,631) (90,084)
Reimbursement payment in connection with the cooperation
and settlement agreement
(3,500) 
 
Amortization of intangibles and other acquisition-related costs(204,448) (210,513) (143,487)
Impairment of assets and other
 (33,944) 
Impairment related to assets held for sale
 (37,219) 
Loss on extinguishment of debt(7,246) 
 
Gain on divestiture1,245
 
 66,472
Changes in value of deferred compensation plan(1,277) (735) (820)
Gain related to investment in Deca Technologies Inc.
 112,774
 
Goodwill impairment charge
 (488,504) 
Impact of purchase accounting and other(17,402) (55,724) (107,328)
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes$2,146
 $(663,617) $(343,455)
The Company does not allocate goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges, impact of purchase accounting, IPR&D, severance and retention costs, settlement agreements, acquisition-related costs, stock-based compensation, interest income and other, and interest expense to its segments. In addition, the Company does not allocate assets to its segments. The Company excludes these items consistent with the manner in which it internally evaluates its results of operations.

Geographical Information

The following table presents our total revenues by geographical locations:

locations

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

December 29,

2013

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

United States

 

$

181,913

 

 

$

89,521

 

 

$

75,052

 

Europe

 

 

181,663

 

 

 

100,510

 

 

 

61,003

 

Asia:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

China

 

 

414,299

 

 

 

294,655

 

 

 

254,993

 

South Korea

 

 

68,464

 

 

 

82,089

 

 

 

96,811

 

Japan

 

 

467,823

 

 

 

64,926

 

 

 

81,856

 

Rest of the world

 

 

293,691

 

 

 

93,796

 

 

 

152,978

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,607,853

 

 

$

725,497

 

 

$

722,693

 

106


 For The Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
 (In thousands)
United States$220,128
 $199,294
 $199,527
Europe291,948
 255,604
 208,525
Greater China (includes China, Taiwan and Hong Kong)980,670
 819,200
 525,274
Japan515,622
 420,869
 464,673
Rest of the World319,403
 228,141
 209,854
Total revenue$2,327,771
 $1,923,108
 $1,607,853


Property, plant and equipment, net, by geographic locations were as follows:    

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

December 28,

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

United States

 

$

269,304

 

 

$

128,544

 

Philippines

 

 

90,356

 

 

 

90,641

 

Thailand

 

 

34,233

 

 

 

 

Japan

 

 

9,537

 

 

 

67

 

Other

 

 

21,573

 

 

 

18,511

 

Total property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

425,003

 

 

$

237,763

 

We track our



 As of
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
 (In thousands)
United States$186,824
 $189,912
Philippines36,747
 37,790
Thailand29,151
 32,547
Japan12,211
 14,898
Other24,621
 22,119
Total property, plant and equipment, net$289,554
 $297,266
The Company tracks its assets by physical location. Although management reviews asset information on a corporate level and allocates depreciation expense by segment, our chief operating decision makerthe Company's CODM does not review asset information on a segment basis.

Customer Information

Outstanding accounts receivable from three of ourone the Company's distributors, accounted for 42%, 11%28% and 9% 24%, respectively, of our consolidated accounts receivable as of January 3, 2016 .Outstanding accounts receivable from three of our distributors, accounted for 12%, 11% and 9% , respectively, of ourCompany's consolidated accounts receivable as of December 28, 2014 .

31, 2017 and January 1, 2017.

Revenue generated through threetwo of ourCompany's distributors, accounted for 25%, 10%20% and 7%13%, respectively, of ourCompany's consolidated revenuerevenues for fiscal 2015.  No end customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenue for fiscal 2015.

2017.

Revenue generated through threeone of ourCompany's distributors, accounted for 13%, 10% and 10% respectively,23% of ourthe Company's consolidated revenuerevenues for fiscal 2014.

2016.

Revenue generated through two of our distributors accounted for 11%,25% and 10%, respectively, of ourthe Company's consolidated revenuerevenues for fiscal 2013. One end customer purchases our products both from our distributors and directly from us. Shipments to this end customer accounted for 12% of our consolidated revenue for fiscal 2013.

NOTE 21. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

Joinder Agreement

On January 6, 2016, we entered into an Incremental Revolving Joinder Agreement to our Credit Facility to increase the amount of revolving commitments under our Credit Facility by an additional $90 million. The total aggregate amount of revolving commitments under the Credit Facility starting January 6, 2016 is $540 million.

$450 million stock buyback program

From January 3, 2016 through February 26, 2016, the Company repurchased 23.7 million shares for a total cost of $181.3 million.

Under the new program authorized in October, 2015 through February 26, 2016, the Company repurchased a total of 29.3 million shares for a total cost of $237.8 million.  As of February 26, 2016, the total dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program is approximately $212.2 million.

107


2015.



Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm


To theBoard of Directors and Stockholders of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation:

In our opinion,


Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionbalance sheets of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”("the Company") atas of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 2016 and December 28, 20141, 2017, and the resultsrelated consolidated statements of their operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and January 3, 20161, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2016,December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the CommitteeCOSO because a material weaknessin internal control over financial reporting related to the calculation of Sponsoring Organizationsstock-based compensation expenseexisted as of that date.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Treadway Commission (COSO).annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness referred to above isdescribed inManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered this material weakness in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2017 consolidatedfinancial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidatedfinancial statements.
Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for certain elements of its employee share-based payments as of January 2, 2017.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.management's report referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidatedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of


the consolidatedfinancial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it has classified deferred taxes on its consolidated balance sheet as


Definition and Limitations of January 3, 2016.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, management has excluded Spansion Inc. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2016 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2015. We have also excluded Spansion Inc. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The total assets of this acquisition are 19% and total revenues represent 59% of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended January 3, 2016.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

March 1, 2016

108


February 26, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1982.


UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


Prior period information included in the tables below has been updated to reflect the impact of the revision. See Note 1 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for further discussion. The 2017 quarterly revisions will be effected in the 2018 unaudited interim financial statements filings on Form 10-Q.
Fiscal 2015

2017

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

January 3,

2016

 

 

September 27,

2015 (3)(5)

 

 

June 28,

2015

 

 

March 29,

2015 (4)

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Revenues

 

$

450,128

 

 

$

463,810

 

 

$

484,778

 

 

$

209,137

 

Gross margin

 

$

143,248

 

 

$

160,376

 

 

$

138,073

 

 

$

(35,652

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(72,797

)

 

$

29,791

 

 

$

(90,691

)

 

$

(247,441

)

Adjust for net loss attributable to non-controlling

   interest

 

$

467

 

 

$

521

 

 

$

640

 

 

$

643

 

Net income attributable to Cypress

 

$

(72,330

)

 

$

30,312

 

 

$

(90,051

)

 

$

(246,798

)

Net income per share–basic

 

$

(0.22

)

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

(0.27

)

 

$

(1.26

)

Net income per share–diluted

 

$

(0.22

)

 

$

0.08

 

 

$

(0.27

)

 

$

(1.26

)

  Three Months Ended December 31, 2017 (1) (3) Three Months Ended October 1, 2017
Revised Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Operations Amounts:   As previously reported Adjustments As revised
Revenues $597,547
 $604,574
 $
 $604,574
Gross Margin $266,900
 $252,605
 $436
 $253,041
Net income (loss) $(34,024) $11,047
 $1,983
 $13,030
Adjust for net loss attributable to non-controlling interest $12
 $(14) $
 $(14)
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress $(34,012) $11,033
 $1,983
 $13,016
Net income (loss) per share - basic $(0.10) $0.03
 $0.01
 $0.04
Net income (loss) per share - diluted $(0.10) $0.03
 $0.01
 $0.04

  Three Months Ended July 2, 2017 (1) (2) Three Months Ended April 2, 2017 (1)
Revised Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Operations Amounts: As previously reported Adjustments As revised As previously reported Adjustments As revised
Revenues $593,776
 $
 $593,776
 $531,874
 $
 $531,874
Gross Margin $236,182
 $833
 $237,015
 $199,060
 $1,446
 $200,506
Net income (loss) $(22.838) $5,984
 $(16,854) $(45,718) 2,783
 $(42,935)
Adjust for net loss attributable to non-controlling interest $(66) $
 $(66) $(64) $
 $(64)
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress $(22,904) $5,984
 $(16,920) $(45,782) $2,783
 $(42,999)
Net income (loss) per share - basic $(0.07) $0.02
 $(0.05) $(0.14) $
 $(0.13)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted $(0.07) $0.02
 $(0.05) $(0.14) $
 $(0.13)
Fiscal 2014

2016

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 28,

2014 (2)

 

 

September 28,

2014

 

 

June 29,

2014

 

 

March 30,

2014 (1)

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Revenues

 

$

184,097

 

 

$

187,516

 

 

$

183,601

 

 

$

170,283

 

Gross margin

 

$

93,702

 

 

$

96,883

 

 

$

95,370

 

 

$

77,723

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

3,076

 

 

$

12,554

 

 

$

9,157

 

 

$

(8,269

)

Adjust for net loss attributable to non-controlling

   interest

 

 

426

 

 

 

286

 

 

 

370

 

 

 

335

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress

 

$

3,502

 

 

$

12,840

 

 

$

9,527

 

 

$

(7,934

)

Net income (loss) per share–basic

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.08

 

 

$

0.06

 

 

$

(0.05

)

Net income (loss) per share–diluted

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.08

 

 

$

0.06

 

 

$

0.05

 

  Three Months Ended January 1, 2017 (7) (8) (9) Three Months Ended October 2, 2016 (7) (9)
Revised Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Operations Amounts: As previously reported Adjustments As revised As previously reported Adjustments As revised
Revenues $530,172
 $
 $530,172
 $523,845
 $
 $523,845
Gross Margin $201,952
 $1,204
 $203,156
 $198,620
 $7,880
 $206,500
Net income (loss) $(72,320) $1,512
 $(70,808) $9,235
 $6,649
 $15,884
Adjust for net loss attributable to non-controlling interest $(46) $
 $(46) $176
 $
 $176
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress $(72,366) $1,512
 $(70,854) $9,411
 $6,649
 $16,060
Net income (loss) per share - basic $(0.22) $
 $(0.22) $0.03
 $0.02
 $0.05
Net income (loss) per share - diluted $(0.22) $
 $(0.22) $0.03
 $0.02
 $0.05



  Three Months Ended July 3, 2016 (5) (6) (9) Three Months Ended April 3, 2016 (4) (9)
Revised Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Operations Amounts: As previously reported Adjustments As revised As previously reported Adjustments As revised
Revenues $450,127
 $
 $450,127
 $418,964
 $
 $418,964
Gross Margin $158,778
 $(3,522) $155,256
 $125,785
 $(3,128) $122,657
Net income (loss) $(519,655) $(2,925) $(522,580) $(104,154) $(2,219) $(106,373)
Adjust for net loss attributable to non-controlling interest $381
 $
 $381
 $132
 $
 $132
Net income (loss) attributable to Cypress $(519,274) $(2,925) $(522,199) $(104,022) $(2,219) $(106,241)
Net income (loss) per share - basic $(1.65) $(0.01) $(1.66) $(0.32) $(0.01) $(0.33)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted $(1.65) $(0.01) $(1.66) $(0.32) $(0.01) $(0.33)

(1)

In

(1)
During the first, quartersecond, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2014,2017, the Company changed the manner in which it accounted for onerecorded $2.5 million, $0.9 million, and $5.6 million, respectively, of its investments in an entity from the cost method of accounting to the equity method of accounting. The Company has restated is historical financial statements for all periods presented as if the Company had accounted for its investment in the entity under the equity method of accounting.restructuring charges. See Note 1510 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(2)

(2)In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company recorded $12.0 million of litigation and proxy related expenses in connection with a shareholder related matter.
(3)During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014,2017, the Company changed from recognizing revenue for sales to certain distributors at the timerecorded impairment charge of shipment, as compared to when resold by the distributor$51.2 million related to the end customer, as it determined it could reliably estimate returns and pricing concessions on certain product families and with certain distributors. This change increased revenuesinvestment in Enovix, a privately held company.
(4)During the fiscal fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2014 by $12.3 million, net income by $6.2 million and net income per share, basic and diluted, by $0.04.   The change increased 2015 revenue by $40.9 million and net income (loss) by $25 million and net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted, by $0.07. See additional disclosures on this change in revenue recognition in Footnote 1 to the consolidated financial statements.  

(3)

During the third quarter of fiscal 2015,2016, the impact from the change in methodology for recognizing revenue for sales to certain distributors at the time of shipment, was increase in revenue of $17.3$9.4 million, increasereduction in net incomeloss of $9.4$3.1 million or $0.03$0.01 per basic and diluted share.

(4)

(5)During the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2015,2016, the impact from the change in methodology for recognizing revenue for sales to certain distributors at the time of shipment, was increase in revenue of $33.5$24.2 million, increasereduction in net incomeloss of $17.5$6.8 million or $0.09$0.02 per basic and diluted share.

(5)

(6)
In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $488.5 million related to the Company's MCD reporting unit. See Note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
(7)
In the third quarter of fiscal 2015,2016, the Company completedhas changed the salemethod of accounting for its TrueTouch® Mobile businessinvestment in Deca Technologies Inc. ("Deca") from consolidation to Parade Technologies and recordedthe equity method of accounting. The change in the method of accounting resulted in a total gain of $66.5$112.8 million.

See
Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. In the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded $1.5 million and $6.7 million, respectively, in share in net loss of equity method investee relating to Deca.
(8)During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the impact from the change in methodology for recognizing revenue for sales to certain distributors at the time of shipment was an increase in revenue of $12.6 million and a reduction in net loss of $2.2 million, or $0.01 per basic and diluted share.
(9)
During the first, second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded $0.3 million, $0.7 million $8 million, and $17.2 million, respectively, of restructuring charges. See Note 10 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly basic and diluted per share information may not equal annual basic and diluted earnings per share.

109





ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTSACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure


Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.of December 31, 2017. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluatingIn addition, the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.


Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K and subject to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level.

level as a result of the material weakness related to stock-based compensation described in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting below.


Notwithstanding the identified material weakness, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K fairly represent in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows at and for the periods presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements andmisstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2016.December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment using thosethese criteria listed above, our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of January 3, 2016.

On March 12, 2015, we completed our merger with Spansion. In connection with the merger, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries merged with and into Spansion, and Spansion and its subsidiaries became part of our consolidated group of subsidiaries. Management considered the transaction materialDecember 31, 2017, due to the resultsexistence of operations, cash flows and financial position from the date of the merger through January 3, 2016 and believes that the internal controls and procedures of Spansion and its subsidiaries have a material effect on internal control over financial reporting. As a result of the merger with Spansion, certain systems and processes were integrated through January 3, 2016 and are included in the scope of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. Dueweakness related to the timingcalculation of the merger, certain systems and processes from Spansion were not integrated. As permitted by the SEC, management’s assessment asstock-based compensation expense. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of January 3, 2016 did not include thedeficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of Spansion, which is included in our consolidatedannual or interim financial statements ascould occur but will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.


The material weakness identified by management was due to internal controls not being designed at a precision level sufficient to detect errors in certain assumptions and calculations used in the determination of January 3, 2016. Spansion constituted approximately 19%non-cash stock-based compensation primarily relating to the Employee Share Purchase Program (“ESPP”). These errors resulted in an overstatement of our total assets atexpenses and net loss or understatement of net income, and did not impact cash generated from operations, related to the fiscal years ended January 3, 2016 and approximately 59%January 1, 2017 and the first three quarters in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

This control deficiency resulted in a revision of total revenuescertain balances and disclosures previously reported in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 3, 2016. SEC guidance provides that an assessment ofperiods indicated above. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a recently acquired business may be omitted in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting in the yearmisstatement of the acquisition.

Based on our assessment, which excluded an assessment of internal controls overaforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial reporting for Spansion, and using the criteria listed above,statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) concludedhas determined that our internalthis control over financial reporting was effective as of January 3, 2016.

110


deficiency constitutes a material weakness.




Our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has issued a report on our internal control over financial reporting. The report on the audit of internal control over financial reporting appears on page 108115 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Remediation Plan to Address Material Weakness

Management’s plan to remediate this material weakness includes redesigning controls over the evaluation of assumptions and detailed calculations relating to the ESPP and expanding its control activities to adequately reconcile and validate assumptions to the models used to determine non-cash stock-based compensation expense. In addition, effective January 1, 2018, management has changed the parameters of the ESPP, which is expected to reduce the number of inputs required to estimate the fair value of those awards.
The material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We expect the remediation of this material weakness to be completed prior to the end of fiscal 2018. 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20152017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION


None.

111


Joseph Rauschmayer, the Company's Executive Vice President of Manufacturing, a named executive officer, will retire February 28, 2018.

The Company's new Executive Vice President of Worldwide Manufacturing, Dr. Wei-Chung Wang, joined the Company in October 2017.





PART III

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We willintend to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and certain information included therein is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item concerning directors is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Proposal One―One - Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we intend to be filedfile with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016 (2016December 31, 2017 (the “2018 Proxy Statement)Statement”).

The information required by this item concerning delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the 20162018 Proxy Statement.

The information required by this item concerning executive officers is incorporated by reference from Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. We have made the code of ethics available, free of charge, on our website at www.cypress.com.

By referring to our website, we do not incorporate such website or its contents into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item concerning executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the sections titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation Tables” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

The information required by this item concerning compensation of directors is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Director Compensation” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

The information required by this item concerning our compensation committee is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the sections titled “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors” in our in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

Quarterly Executive Incentive Payments

There were no performance incentive payments earned by our executive officers in accordance with the terms of our Key Employee Bonus Plan (the “KEBP”) and the Performance Bonus Plan (the “PBP”) for the fourth quarter and the annual portion of fiscal 2015.


ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and executive officers is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

The information required by this item regarding our equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference from Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item concerning transactions with certain persons is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the sections titled “ Policies"Policies and Procedures with Respect to Related Person Transactions” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

112




The information required by this item concerning director independence is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Corporate Governance” in our 2018 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item concerning fees and services is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Proposal Two—Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

The information required by this item regarding the audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the section titled “Proposal Two—Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our 20162018 Proxy Statement.

113




PART IV

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


(a)

(a)The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

1.Financial Statements:

1.

Financial Statements:

Page

Page
Consolidated Balance Sheets

as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017

60

54

Consolidated Statements of Operations

for the year ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016

61

55

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

63

56

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

64

57

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

66

59


2.Financial Statement Schedule for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016:

2.

Financial Statement Schedule:

Page

Page
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

117

123

The exhibits listed below are required to be filed as exhibits to the Cypress Semiconductor’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2016.

December 31, 2017.
3.Exhibits:
See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 16.     FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not applicable.


SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
 Balance at
Beginning of
Period
 Additions Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts
 Deductions Credited to Expenses or Other Accounts
 Balance at
End of
Period
 (In thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable: 
  
  
  
Year ended December 31, 2017$1,028
 $
 $
 $1,028
Year ended January 1, 2017$1,189
 $490
 $(651) $1,028
Year ended January 3, 2016$738
 $576
 $(125) $1,189
Deferred tax valuation allowance 
  
  
  
Year ended December 31, 2017$445,030
 $68,161
(1),(2)$
 $513,191
Year ended January 1, 2017$512,975
 $

$(67,945)(1)$445,030
Year ended January 3, 2016$358,424
 $154,551
(1)$
 $512,975
(1)Represents the change in valuation allowance primarily related to federal and state deferred tax assets that management has determined not likely to be realized due, in part, to projections of future taxable income.
(2)Includes unrecognized tax benefits recorded as deferred tax asset of $138.0 million related to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

3.

Exhibits:

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Date: February 26, 2018By:
/ S / Thad Trent
Thad Trent
Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer



POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Hassane El-Khoury and Thad Trent, jointly and severally, his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/S/ HASSANE EL-KHOURY
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)February 26, 2018
Hassane El-Khoury
/S/ THAD TRENT
Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)February 26, 2018
 Thad Trent
/S/ W. STEVE ALBRECHT
Chairman of the Board of DirectorsFebruary 26, 2018
W. Steve Albrecht
/S/ OH CHUL KWON
DirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Oh Chul Kwon
/s/ CATHERINE P. LEGODirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Catherine P. Lego
/s/ CAMILLO MARTINODirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Camillo Martino
/S/ J. DANIEL MCCRANIE
DirectorFebruary 26, 2018
J. Daniel McCranie
/s/ JEFFREY J. OWENSDirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Jeffrey J. Owens
/s/ JEANNINE P. SARGENTDirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Jeannine P. Sargent
/S/ MICHAEL S. WISHART
DirectorFebruary 26, 2018
Michael S. Wishart
















EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

Filing Date/

Period

End Date

Filed

Herewith

2.1

1

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act.

2.1

8-K

12/1/2014

3.1

10-K

12/31/2000

3.2

3.1.1


8-K3/24/2017
3.2

8-K

10-Q

3/12/2015

8/9/2016

4.1

3.2.1


8-K3/24/2017
4.1

8-K(1)

8-K(1)

3/12/2015

10.1

4.2

8-K6/23/2016
4.3

8-K

6/23/2016

4.410-Q7/3/2016
4.5

8-K11/6/2017
4.6

8-K11/6/2017
10.1+Form of Indemnification Agreement.

S-1

S-1(2)

3/4/1987

10.210.2+

10-Q7/3/2016
10.3+10-Q7/3/2016
10.4 +

10-K

1/3/2016

X

10.310.48


8-K2/21/2017
10.49

8-K4/10/2017


114


Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

Filing Date/

Period

End Date

Filed

Herewith

10.10

10-Q

6/29/2003

10.11

10.1110-Q10/1/2006
10.1210-K12/31/2006
10.13

10-K

12/31/2006

10.12

10.14

10-Q

4/1/2007

10.13

10.15

10-Q

7/1/2007

10.14

10.16

10-Q

7/1/2007

10.15

10.17

10-K

12/30/2007

10.16

10.18

10-Q

3/30/2008

10.17 +

10.19

1999 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan,

S-8

10/24/2008

10.18 +

Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated.

X

10.19 +

Amended and Restated Cypress Semiconductor Corporation 2013 Stock Plan.

as Buyer dated as of April 28, 2016.

10-Q

9/27/2015

4/3/2016

10.20 +

10-Q4/3/2016
10.2110-Q7/3/2016
10.228-K7/5/2016
10.23+

10-Q

9/27/2015



10.21 +

10.24+

10-Q

6/28/2015

10.22 +

10.25+

S-8

12/12/2012

10.23 +

10.26+

S-8(1)

S-8(3)

5/10/2010

10.24 +

10.27+

8-K(1)

8-K(3)

5/14/2010

10.25

10.28+

S-810/24/2008
10.29+10-Q9/27/2015
10.30+10-K3/2/2016
10.31+
8-K

2/25/2016

10.32

8-K

12/1/2014

10.26

10.33

8-K

12/1/2014

10.27 +

10.34+

10-K

2/17/2015

10.28 +

10.37+

J. Daniel McCranie


10-K

10-Q

2/17/2015

7/3/2016

10.29+

10.39+

Separation Agreement with J. Daniel McCranie.

10-Q

8-K

3/29/2015

8/12/2016

10.30

10.41+

10-K1/1/2017
10.42+

8-K

3/12/2015

10.31

10.43+

8-K

8-K(1)

3/12/2015

10.32

10.44

Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2015, by and among Cypress Semiconductor Corporation and the other grantors from time to time party thereto, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as collateral agent.

8-K

3/12/2015

10.33

8-K

12/22/2015

1/11/2016

10.34

10.45

8-K

12/22/2015

1/11/2016

10.35

10.46

10-Q5/10/2016
10.4710-Q4/3/2016
10.4810-Q8/12/2003
10.49

10-Q(1)

10-Q(3)

5/20/29/2014

10.36+10.50++

10-Q

9/27/16/2015

21.1

10.51


X
21.1

X



115


Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

24.1

Exhibit Description

Form

Filing Date/

Period

End Date

Filed

Herewith

24.1

Power of Attorney (reference is made(incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).


X

31.1

X

31.2

X

32.1+++

X

32.2+++

X

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

X

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

X

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

X

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

X

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

X

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

X

+

+Identifies a management contract or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit.

++

Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to portions of this exhibit.

+++

Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibits be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise specifically stated in such filing.


(1)

(1)The agreement and description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amendment and Restatement Agreement, Restated Credit Agreement and the Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement, which are attached as Exhibits 10.1, Exhibit 10.2 and Exhibit 10.3, respectively, to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 12, 2015, and are incorporated herein by reference.
(2)There is no hyperlink available for this exhibit.
(3)Indicates a filing of Spansion Inc.


116


SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 

 

Balance at

Beginning of

Period

 

 

Charges (Releases)

to Expenses/Revenues

 

 

Deductions

 

 

Balance at

End of

Period

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended January 3, 2016

 

$

738

 

 

$

576

 

 

$

(125

)

 

$

1,189

 

Year ended December 28, 2014

 

$

719

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

(20

)

 

$

738

 

Year ended December 29, 2013

 

$

769

 

 

$

51

 

 

$

(101

)

 

$

719

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax valuation allowance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended January 3, 2016

 

$

358,424

 

 

$

166,597

 

(1)

$

 

 

$

525,021

 

Year ended December 28, 2014

 

$

334,671

 

 

$

23,753

 

(1)

$

 

 

$

358,424

 

Year ended December 29, 2013

 

$

307,199

 

 

$

27,472

 

(1)

$

 

 

$

334,671

 


(1)

Represents the change in valuation allowance primarily related to federal and state  deferred tax assets that management has determined not likely to be realized due, in part, to projections of future taxable income

130

117


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

Date: March 1, 2016

By:

/ S /  Thad Trent

Thad Trent

Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer

118


POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints T.J. Rodgers and Thad Trent, jointly and severally, his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/ S /    T. J. RODGERS   

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

March 1, 2016

      T. J. Rodgers

/ S /    THAD TRENT  

Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

March 1, 2016

      Thad Trent

/ S /    W. STEVE ALBRECHT  

Director

March 1, 2016

       W. Steve Albrecht

/ S /    ERIC A. BENHAMOU    

Director

March 1, 2016

    Eric A. Benhamou

/ S /    RAYMOND BINGHAM      

Chairman of the Board of Directors

March 1, 2016

   Raymond Bingham

/ S /    JOHN KISPERT

Director

March 1, 2016

        John Kispert

/ S /    O. C. KWON

Director

March 1, 2016

        O. C. Kwon

/ S /    WILBERT G.M. VAN DEN HOEK  

Director

March 1, 2016

      Wilbert G.M. Van Den Hoek

/ S /   MICHAELS. WISHART  

Director

March 1, 2016

      Michael S. Wishart

119